MOBILE VIEW  | 

PLANTS-GELSEMIUM

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) This is a plant found commonly in the Southern United States. It is toxic to children in small amounts. Children have become intoxicated from chewing leaves or flowers, or drinking the flower nectar (Morton, 1958).
    B) Most intoxications have occurred after use of galenical products derived from the roots, that were used to treat neuralgia. Most of these poisonings occurred around 1900.

Specific Substances

    1) Gelsemium sempervirens
    2) Carolina jasmine
    3) Carolina jessamine
    4) Carolina Wild Woodbine
    5) Evening Trumpet Flower
    6) Madreselva
    7) Wood Vine
    8) Yellow False Jasmine
    9) Yellow Jessamine

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) HONEY: The honey made from the nectar of this plant is potentially toxic, and even honeybees have become intoxicated from the nectar (Gowanloch & Brown, 1943).
    2) ALKALOID DISTRIBUTION: The various alkaloids (sempervirine, gelsemine, gelsemicine) are distributed throughout the plant, but have their greatest concentration in the roots and flower nectar (Hardin & Arena, 1974).
    B) USES
    1) Various root and rhizome extracts have been used for pain relief, particularly in neuralgic conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia and migraine, as a treatment for fever, as an emetic, and as a CNS depressant (Krochmal & Krochmal, 1973; Lewis & Elvin-Lewis, 1977; Leung, 1980; JEF Reynolds , 2000).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) Effects of poisoning include headache, dizziness, dry mouth, sweating, muscular weakness or rigidity, seizures, dyspnea, and bradycardia.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) Mydriasis, ptosis (due to muscle weakness), diplopia, and visual loss may be seen with poisonings.
    B) Dry mouth and difficulty in swallowing and speaking may occur.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Bradycardia may occur.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Dyspnea may occur. Death is due to failure of respiratory musculature.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Dizziness and headaches may occur. In severe poisonings there may be a rare seizure.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Dermatitis has been reported after handling the leaves, flowers, and roots.
    0.2.15) MUSCULOSKELETAL
    A) Trismus and muscular rigidity may be seen, as may general muscular weakness.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during pregnancy or lactation.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the carcinogenic potential of this agent.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) No specific laboratory measures are indicated.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) Gastric decontamination is recommended. For large amounts, gastric lavage may be indicated. Activated charcoal should be given.
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    1) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    D) SEIZURES: Administer a benzodiazepine; DIAZEPAM (ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed. CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed) or LORAZEPAM (ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist. CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue).
    1) Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures recur after diazepam 30 mg (adults) or 10 mg (children greater than 5 years).
    2) Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.
    E) ATROPINE: ADULT DOSE: BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: 0.5 mg IV may repeat every 3 to 5 min. Maximum: 3 mg. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.02 mg/kg IV/IO (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg ET). Repeat once, if needed. Minimum dose: 0.1 mg. Maximum single dose: Child: 0.5 mg; Adolescent: 1 mg. Maximum total dose: Child: 1 mg; Adolescent: 2 mg.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Range Of Toxicity

    A) Minimum lethal human exposure is unknown.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) Effects of poisoning include headache, dizziness, dry mouth, sweating, muscular weakness or rigidity, seizures, dyspnea, and bradycardia.

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) Mydriasis, ptosis (due to muscle weakness), diplopia, and visual loss may be seen with poisonings.
    B) Dry mouth and difficulty in swallowing and speaking may occur.
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) MYDRIASIS has occurred (Ellis MD, 1975).
    B) PTOSIS has occurred (Lampe & Fagerstrom, 1968).
    C) DIPLOPIA has occurred (Westbrooks & Preacher, 1986).
    D) VISUAL LOSS - Dimness of vision has occurred. The various visual difficulties may persist for several days (Ellis MD, 1975).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) XEROSTOMIA - Dry mouth has been noted (Ellis MD, 1975).
    B) DYSPHAGIA - Difficulty in swallowing and speaking may occur (Ellis MD, 1975).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Bradycardia may occur.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BRADYCARDIA
    1) Bradycardia may occur (Lampe & Fagerstrom, 1968).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Dyspnea may occur. Death is due to failure of respiratory musculature.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) Dyspnea may be seen (Ellis MD, 1975).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Dizziness and headaches may occur. In severe poisonings there may be a rare seizure.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, in severe exposures (Lampe & McCann, 1985).
    B) DIZZINESS
    1) Dizziness has been reported (Ellis MD, 1975; Morton, 1982).
    C) HEADACHE
    1) Headache has been reported (Ellis MD, 1975; Kingsbury, 1964).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Dermatitis has been reported after handling the leaves, flowers, and roots.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DERMATITIS
    1) Dermatitis has been reported after handling leaves, flowers, and roots (Tampion, 1977) Westbrook & Preacher, 1986; (Mitchell & Rook, 1979).
    B) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) Profuse sweating may occur (Ellis MD, 1975).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.1) SUMMARY
    A) Trismus and muscular rigidity may be seen, as may general muscular weakness.
    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MUSCLE WEAKNESS
    1) Muscular weakness may occur. Some patients have found it difficult to close their mouths (Ellis MD, 1975).
    B) DYSTONIA
    1) Trismus and muscle rigidity has been reported (Ellis MD, 1975).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during pregnancy or lactation.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the teratogenic potential of this agent.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during pregnancy or lactation.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the carcinogenic potential of this agent.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the carcinogenic or mutagenic potential of this agent.

Genotoxicity

    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the mutagenic or genotoxic potential of this agent.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) No specific laboratory measures are indicated.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) A number of chemicals produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system, liver, and kidneys. Monitoring complete blood count, urinalysis, and liver and kidney function tests is suggested for patients with significant exposure.
    2) No specific measures are indicated.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) A number of chemicals produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system, liver, and kidneys. Monitoring urinalysis is suggested for patients with significant exposure.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) No specific laboratory measures are indicated.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) EMESIS/ NOT RECOMMENDED -
    1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for seizures.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for seizures.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Large ingestions should be lavaged. In other cases, the risk/benefit for lavage should be weighed against the potential for seizures.
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) There is no specific antidote. After gastric decontamination, patients should be observed for bradycardia, seizures, and respiratory failure. In severe cases, life support is especially important.
    B) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    C) BRADYCARDIA
    1) ATROPINE/DOSE
    a) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    1) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    2) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) No studies have addressed the utilization of extracorporeal elimination techniques in poisoning with this agent.

Case Reports

    A) SPECIFIC AGENT
    1) ORAL
    a) HONEY - Three persons reportedly died after eating contaminated honey. Although the deaths were blamed on Gelsemium-containing honey, the only evidence was symptoms consistent with the poisoning, and an abundance of flowers in the area used by the bees. The honey was not analyzed (Chestnut, 1898).
    B) PEDIATRIC
    1) A 3.5-year-old ate 5 blossoms. She was taken to an ED and given ipecac. It failed to induce vomiting in 10 minutes, so lavage was instituted, then activated charcoal. She vomited the charcoal. She was well at 10 hours postingestion (Blaw et al, 1979).

Summary

    A) Minimum lethal human exposure is unknown.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The minimum lethal human dose to this agent has not been delineated.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The maximum tolerated human exposure to this agent has not been delineated.
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) Chewing on 5 flowers made a 3-year-old ill (Blaw et al, 1979).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) The plant contains the indole alkaloids gelsemine, gelsemicine, sempervirine, and others (Perkins K & Payne W, 1978; Swan, 1967), which act on the central nervous system (Morton, 1982) Perkins & Payne, 1978).
    B) The primary effects are paralysis of the motor nerve endings which lead to respiratory arrest and a strychnine-like action on the spinal cord (Fuller & McClintock, 1986).

Clinical Effects

    11.1.1) AVIAN/BIRD
    A) Poultry fed the green leaves for two weeks died 5 to 11 days later and had symptoms 4 to 5 days before they expired (Kingsbury, 1964).
    11.1.2) BOVINE/CATTLE
    A) Animals first exhibit muscular weakness, staggering, mydriasis, and some convulsive motions. A few days later the animals become prostrate and die within 1 to 2 days. Animals generally die of respiratory failure (West & Emmel, 1952).

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    3) Blaw M, Adkisson M, & Garriott J: Poisoning with Carolina jessamine, Gelsemium sempervirens (L) Ait. J Pediatri 1979; 94:998-1001.
    4) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    5) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    6) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    7) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    8) Chestnut V: Principal Poisonous Plants of the United States. Bulletin No. 20, USDA, Division of Botany, Washington, DC, 1898.
    9) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    10) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    11) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    12) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    13) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    14) Ellis MD: Dangerous Plants, Snakes, Arthropods & Marine Life of Texas. US DHEW, 1975.
    15) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    16) Fuller TC & McClintock E: Poisonous Plants of California, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1986.
    17) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    18) Gowanloch JN & Brown CA: Poisonous Snakes, Plants, and Black Widow Spiders of Louisiana, Louisiana Dept Conservation, New Orleans, LA, 1943.
    19) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    20) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    21) Hardin JW & Arena JM: Human Poisonings from Native and Cultivated Plants, 2nd ed, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1974.
    22) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    23) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    24) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    25) JEF Reynolds : Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia (electronic version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    26) Kingsbury JM: Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.
    27) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    28) Krochmal A & Krochmal C: A Guide to the Medicinal Plants of the United States, Quadrange, New York Times Book Co, New York, NY, 1973.
    29) Lampe KF & Fagerstrom R: Plant Toxicity and Dermatitis, Williams and Wilkens Company, Baltimore, MD, 1968.
    30) Lampe KF & McCann MA: AMA Handbook of Poisonous and Injurious Plants, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1985.
    31) Leung A: Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients Used in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1980.
    32) Lewis W & Elvin-Lewis M: Medical Botany. Plants Affecting Man's Health, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1977.
    33) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    34) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    35) Mitchell J & Rook A: Botanical Dermatology, Greengrass, Vancouver, BC, 1979.
    36) Morton J: Plants Poisonous to People in Florida and Other Warm Areas, 2nd ed, Hurricane Press, Miami, FL, 1982.
    37) Morton JF: Ornamental plants with poisonous properties. Proc Florida State Hort Soc 1958; 71:372.
    38) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    39) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    40) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    41) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    42) Perkins K & Payne W: Guide to the Poisonous and Irritant Plants of Florida. University of Florida, Gainesville: Circular 441, Cooperative Extension Service, Inst Food and Agric Sci, 1978.
    43) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    44) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    45) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    46) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    47) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    48) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    49) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    50) Swan G: An Introduction to the Alkaloids, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1967.
    51) Tampion J: Dangerous Plants, Universe Books, New York, NY, 1977.
    52) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    53) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    54) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    55) West E & Emmel MW: Poisonous Plants in Florida. Florida Agr Expt Sta Bull 1952; 510.
    56) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.