MOBILE VIEW  | 

CHENOPODIUM OIL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Chenopodium oil is an essential oil derived from the fresh flowering and fruiting parts, excluding the roots, of Chenopodium ambrosioides (family, Chenopodiaceas) var anthelminticum. It has been used therapeutically as an anthelminthic.

Specific Substances

    1) Aetheroleum Chenopodii
    2) American Wormseed Oil
    3) Anthelminthicum Oil America
    4) Anthelmintici Etherum
    5) Baltimore Oil
    6) Chenopodium Ambrosioldes, Var.
    7) Esencia de Quenopodio Vermifuga
    8) Missouri Oil
    9) Oleum Chenopodii
    10) Oil of American Wormseed
    11) Oil of Chenopodium
    12) Wormseed Oil, America
    13) Wurmsamenol
    14) CAS 8006-99-3 (Chenopodium Oil)
    15) CAS 512-85-6 (Ascaridole)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Chenopodium oil is colorless or yellowish when first distilled. It becomes deeper yellow or brown following use. The odor is a penetrating and somewhat camphorous. Its taste is pungent and bitter ((Anon, 2001); (Grieve, 1995); Budavari, 1996). The chief constituent of the oil is ascaridole (60% to 70%), which is readily decomposed on heating.
    B) SOURCES
    1) Chenopodium oil is extracted via steam-distillation from the fresh flowering and fruiting parts, excluding the roots, of chenopodium ambroisioides variety anthelminticum. It contains not less than 65% w/v of ascaridol ((Anon, 2001); Osol & Farrar, 1955). Common names for this plant include American Wormseed and Jerusalem Oak (Budavari, 1996).
    C) USES
    1) Chenopodium oil was an anthelminthic used for treatment of roundworms (Ascaris) and hookworms (Sweetman, 2001; ((Grieve, 1995); Budavari, 1996). Since the 1940's, chenopodium oil has mostly been replaced with other more effective and safer antihelminthics ((Anon, 1998)).
    2) The use of chenopodium oil is NOT recommended as a flavoring agent. When heated, the oil may explode (Sweetman, 2001).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) Overdoses of this oil have caused fatalities in both man and animals. The active ingredient is ascaridol. The highest concentrations are in the seeds, followed by the leaves and stems of the plant, Chenopodium ambrosioides.
    B) Children, the elderly, and the malnourished are the most susceptible. Cumulative toxicity is possible.
    C) Symptoms generally start several hours after ingestion of the oil and include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache. These symptoms are soon followed by drowsiness, deafness, tinnitus, and in some cases, ataxia, coma, seizures, tachycardia, and death.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) Headache, facial flushing, impaired vision, and deafness have been reported after the topical and oral use of chenopodium oil.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Hypotension and tachycardia have been reported after exposure.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Respiratory depression and acute lung injury were reported after ingestions of greater than 3 mL.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Vertigo, ataxia, paresthesias, and drowsiness are common neurologic findings. Seizures have also been reported in both human and animal studies.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Gastroenteritis has been reported in human fatalities. Increased salivation has been seen in poisoned animals and humans.
    0.2.9) HEPATIC
    A) Changes in hepatic parenchyma have been reported in fatal cases.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Kidney damage, hematuria, and albuminuria have been reported in human cases.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported after the ingestion of chenopodium oil.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Chenopodium oil is contraindicated in pregnancy.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) No toxic serum levels have been established for chenopodium oil.
    B) Monitor renal and hepatic function following significant acute exposures.
    C) Monitor fluid status in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor neurological function following toxic exposures.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    1) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    C) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    D) Fluid and electrolyte replacement is indicated in cases where excessive vomiting and diarrhea have occurred.
    E) Aggressive supportive care should be used in those cases where CNS toxicity occurs.
    F) SEIZURES: Administer a benzodiazepine; DIAZEPAM (ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed. CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed) or LORAZEPAM (ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist. CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue).
    1) Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures recur after diazepam 30 mg (adults) or 10 mg (children greater than 5 years).
    2) Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    H) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) Severe poisoning has been seen after 2 doses of 0.62 mL 4 hours apart and death has occurred after 2 treatments of 3 mL within 1 week. The maximum therapeutic dose is said to be 3 mL. The usual adult dose is 0.6 to 1 mL.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) Overdoses of this oil have caused fatalities in both man and animals. The active ingredient is ascaridol. The highest concentrations are in the seeds, followed by the leaves and stems of the plant, Chenopodium ambrosioides.
    B) Children, the elderly, and the malnourished are the most susceptible. Cumulative toxicity is possible.
    C) Symptoms generally start several hours after ingestion of the oil and include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache. These symptoms are soon followed by drowsiness, deafness, tinnitus, and in some cases, ataxia, coma, seizures, tachycardia, and death.

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) Headache, facial flushing, impaired vision, and deafness have been reported after the topical and oral use of chenopodium oil.
    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) HEADACHE has been a frequently reported early symptom (Osol & Farrar, 1955).
    B) The face may be flushed after exposure (Sollmann, 1957).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IMPAIRED VISION, which is a temporary effect, has been reported with ingestions (usually greater than 3 mL) (Osol & Farrar, 1955; Grant & Schuman, 1993); this may be due to paralysis of the eye muscles (Sollman, 1957). Miosis has been reported (Levy, 1914).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) TINNITUS has been reported (Guyton, 1946; Levy, 1914).
    B) TEMPORARY DEAFNESS has been reported in several cases. This symptom may occur in 20% of patients. The effects may last several weeks to months but are seldom present after two years (Sollmann, 1957).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hypotension and tachycardia have been reported after exposure.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Hypotension may occur with ingestion (Osol & Farrar, 1955).
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) Tachycardia has been reported in both animal and human cases (Sollmann, 1957; Levy, 1914).
    3.5.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEART DISORDER
    a) Chenopodium Oil appears to have a direct cardio-toxic effect, and animals fatally poisoned were usually found to have edematous hearts (Salant & Nelson, 1915).
    2) HYPOTENSION
    a) Animals injected with 0.02 mL/kg of chenopodium oil frequently were reported to have 40% to 50% decreases in blood pressure (Salant, 1917).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Respiratory depression and acute lung injury were reported after ingestions of greater than 3 mL.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) Respiratory depression has been noted after administration of large doses in humans (Sollmann, 1957) and in animals (Salant & Nelson, 1915).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Acute lung injury (pulmonary edema) was a common finding in fatal cases (Guyton, 1946).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Vertigo, ataxia, paresthesias, and drowsiness are common neurologic findings. Seizures have also been reported in both human and animal studies.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DIZZINESS
    1) Vertigo has been reported (Sollmann, 1957) and may be severe.
    B) CEREBELLAR DISORDER
    1) Gait incoordination, ataxia, and CNS depression were reported in poisoned cats and dogs (Osol & Farrar, 1955); muscle spasms and incoordination with ataxia and gait abnormalities have been seen in both humans and animals (Salant & Nelson, 1915; Levy, 1914).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures, tremors, and muscle spasms have been reported in poisoned animals and humans (Osol & Farrar, 1955; Salant & Nelson, 1915; Levy, 1914). Without appropriate treatment, seizures may last from 24 to 48 hours (Anon, 1939).
    D) DROWSY
    1) Drowsiness occurs with mild cases, but serious exposures may lead to coma (Osol & Farrar, 1955; Levy, 1914). In fatal cases, death may follow two to three days of coma (Sollmann, 1957).
    E) PARESTHESIA
    1) Paresthesias have been reported even with therapeutic administration (Guyton, 1946; Levy, 1914). Paralysis is commonly reported in toxicity studies in animals (Salant & Nelson, 1915).
    F) DELIRIUM
    1) Delirium has been reported in fatal cases (Guyton, 1946).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Gastroenteritis has been reported in human fatalities. Increased salivation has been seen in poisoned animals and humans.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported (Grant & Schuman, 1993; Osol & Farrar, 1955; Levy, 1914). Diffuse hyperemia and gastritis were seen on autopsy in one human fatality (Guyton, 1946).
    B) EXCESSIVE SALIVATION
    1) Increased salivation has been reported in poisoned animals and humans (Osol & Farrar, 1955; Levy, 1914).
    3.8.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) GASTRITIS HEMORRHAGIC
    a) Salant & Nelson (1915) reported inflammation of the stomach and intestinal mucosa in animal studies following toxic doses of chenopodium oil. Hemorrhagic gastritis was also reported in some of the animals.

Hepatic

    3.9.1) SUMMARY
    A) Changes in hepatic parenchyma have been reported in fatal cases.
    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) Hepatic damage has been reported. The oil may potentiate pre-existing impaired liver function. Jaundice may occur following an ingestion (Osol & Farrar, 1955). Parenchymatous changes in the liver were a common finding in fatal cases (Guyton, 1946).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Kidney damage, hematuria, and albuminuria have been reported in human cases.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ABNORMAL RENAL FUNCTION
    1) Kidney damage may occur. The oil is contraindicated in patients with renal damage or impaired renal function (Osol & Farrar, 1955). Hematuria and albuminuria may occur after exposure (Osol & Farrar, 1955). Parenchymatous changes of the kidney were a common finding in fatal cases (Guyton, 1946).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ALBUMINURIA
    a) Salant (1917) reported frequent albuminuria and urinary casts when chenopodium oil was administered to rabbits.

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported after the ingestion of chenopodium oil.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LYELL'S TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS, SUBEPIDERMAL TYPE
    1) Toxic epidermal necrolysis was reported in one individual who was being treated with chenopodium oil (Potter et al, 1960).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Chenopodium oil is contraindicated in pregnancy.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Chenopodium oil is contraindicated in pregnancy.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) HEPATIC CARCINOMA
    1) TOADS - Hepatocellular carcinomas were induced in 19 out of 82 (23%) of Egyptian toads Bufo regularis when fed diets with oil of the chenopodium plant for 3 to 4 months (average latent period of tumor induction was 3.6 months). Six of the toads developed metastatic kidney tumors, with the same histologic appearance as that of the primary liver tumors (El-Mofty et al, 1992).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) No toxic serum levels have been established for chenopodium oil.
    B) Monitor renal and hepatic function following significant acute exposures.
    C) Monitor fluid status in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor neurological function following toxic exposures.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Toxic serum levels for chenopodium oil have not been established.
    2) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with severe vomiting or diarrhea.
    3) Monitor renal and hepatic function.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor urinary output and urinary albumin in symptomatic patients.
    b) Monitor neurological function following an acute exposure or in symptomatic patients.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) No toxic serum levels have been established for chenopodium oil.
    B) Monitor renal and hepatic function following significant acute exposures.
    C) Monitor fluid status in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor neurological function following toxic exposures.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED -
    1) Emesis is NOT recommended due to the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    2) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    3) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    4) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) There is no antidote for chenopodium oil toxicity. Treatment is primarily directed at support of cardiac, respiratory, CNS, liver, and kidney toxicity.
    B) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE BALANCE REGULATION
    1) Electrolyte and fluid replacement may be required if the patient is having extensive nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
    C) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    E) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    F) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) OILS -
    a) Cottonseed, olive, and castor oil decrease the toxicity when taken concomitantly (Anon, 1939). Animal studies in non-carnivorous animals showed a decreased general toxicity but an increased renal toxicity when chenopodium oil was administered with a fatty oil. This effect was not seen with carnivorous animals (Salant, 1917).
    b) Administration of 30 milliliters of fatty oil MAY reduce chenopodium toxicity, but has not yet been tried in humans.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) No studies have addressed the utilization of extracorporeal elimination techniques in poisoning with this agent.

Summary

    A) Severe poisoning has been seen after 2 doses of 0.62 mL 4 hours apart and death has occurred after 2 treatments of 3 mL within 1 week. The maximum therapeutic dose is said to be 3 mL. The usual adult dose is 0.6 to 1 mL.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) GENERAL
    1) 0.6 to 1 milliliter (in a capsule) is given on an empty stomach, which is then followed two hours later by an identical dose. Two hours after this second dose, a saline or oily cathartic is given ((Grieve, 1995)).
    2) Levy (1914) has reported giving doses of 16 drops of the oil on an empty stomach and repeated every 2 hours to a total of 3 doses. The last dose is followed by a cathartic.
    3) Chenopodium oil has been generally superceded by less toxic medications (Osol & Farrar, 1955; (Anon, 1998)). The margin of safety is very small (Anon, 1939).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) GENERAL
    1) 0.05 milliliter per year of age divided into two or three parts (Osol & Farrar, 1955).
    2) Levy (1914) reported pediatric doses of 5 to 10 minims, given orally 2 or 3 times daily for 2 days, then followed by a cathartic.
    3) Grieve (1995) suggests a pediatric dose of 5 to 10 minims, given on an empty stomach, and followed by a cathartic. Because the eggs are not destroyed, the dose is repeated 10 days later.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) PEDIATRIC
    1) Levy (1914) reported, from a survey of the literature, death in a 6-year-old following a dose of 8 drops given 3 times daily for 2 days, and 8 drops given on the third day. The child developed drowsiness, fever, nausea and vomiting, and coma, and died within 4 days.
    2) Levy (1914) reported a 1-year-old infant who died within 8 days of receiving chenopodium oil, 4 drops 3 times daily for 2 days and 4 drops on the third day. Drowsiness, fever, nausea and vomiting, seizures, and coma preceded death.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The plant contains 1 to 2 percent volatile oil. This oil is 45 to 70 percent ascaridol (Spoerke, 1980; Budavari, 1996; (Grieve, 1995)).
    B) ADULT
    1) Severe poisoning has been seen after two doses of 10 minims (0.62 milliliter) four hours apart, and death has occurred after two treatments of 3 milliliters within one week (Sollmann, 1957).
    2) The maximum therapeutic dose is said to be 3 milliliters (Anon, 1939).

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    1) 255 mg/kg (RTECS , 2001)

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Chenopodium paralyzes the worms, but does not kill them. The worms are then transported and emptied by the intestinal movements toward the large intestine. A cathartic is used to expel the paralyzed worms (Osol & Farrar, 1955).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) This oil is a strong local irritant, causing severe inflammation of mucous membranes (Salant, 1917). This oil is also a general depressant and has a depressant activity on the heart, lungs, uterus, and peristalsis (Salant, 1917).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Chenopodium oil is a colorless or pale yellow oily liquid with a characteristic unpleasant odor and a burning taste ((Anon, 2001); Budavari, 1996; Osol & Farrar, 1955).
    B) Ascaridol is a peroxide in chenopodium oil which may explode when heated (Sweetman, 2001; (Spoerke, 1980).

Molecular Weight

    A) Varies

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    3) Anon: Chenopodium ambrosioldes, var. anthelminthicum oil America. CoreComm. East Lansing, MI, USA. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.execpc.com/~goodscnt/data/es1068512.html. As accessed Accessed October 5, 2001.
    4) Anon: Conference on therapy. The use of anthelmintics. JAMA 1939; 113:410-415.
    5) Anon: Treating Livestock with Medicinal Plants: Beneficial or Toxic? Chenopodium ambrosioides. Cornell University Animal Science Department. Ithaca, NY, USA. 1998. Available from URL: http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/plants/medicinal/epazote.html. As accessed Accessed November 17, 1998.
    6) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    7) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    8) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    9) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996, pp 1165.
    10) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    11) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    12) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    13) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    14) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    15) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    16) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    17) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    18) El-Mofty MM, Khudoley VV, & Sakr SA: Induction of neoplasms in Egyptian toads Bufo regularis by oil of chenopodium. Oncology 1992; 49:253-255.
    19) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    20) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    21) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    22) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    23) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th edition, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    24) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    25) Guyton WL: Poisoning due to oil of chenopodium. JAMA 1946; 132:330-331.
    26) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    27) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    28) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    29) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    30) Kingsbury JM: Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.
    31) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    32) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    33) Levy RL: Oil of chenopodium in the treatment of hookworm infections. JAMA 1914; 63:1946-1949.
    34) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    35) M Grieve: A Modern Herbal: Wormseed, American. Botanical.com. St. Louis, MO, USA. 1995. Available from URL: http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/w/worame35.html. As accessed Accessed November 17, 1998.
    36) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    37) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    38) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    39) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    40) Osol A & Farrar GE: The Dispensatory of the United States of America, 25th ed, JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1955.
    41) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    42) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    43) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    44) Potter B, Auerbach R, & Lorincz AL: Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 1960; 82:903.
    45) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    46) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    47) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    48) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    49) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    50) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    51) Salant W & Nelson EK: The toxicity of oil of chenopodium. Am J Physiology 1915; 36:440-463.
    52) Salant W: The pharmacology of the oil of chenopodium. JAMA 1917; 69:2016-2017.
    53) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    54) Sollmann T: A Manual of Pharmacology, 8th ed. W.B, Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1957.
    55) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    56) Spoerke DG: Herbal Medications, Woodbridge Press, Santa Barbara, 1980.
    57) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    58) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    59) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    60) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    61) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    62) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    63) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.