6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
A) DILUTION - 1) Solutions greater than 5 percent phenol may damage the esophageal mucosa; dilution with water or milk has been recommended but is controversial since dilution may also enhance absorption of phenol. Even with solutions under 5 percent dilution may be of use, but the benefits need to be weighed against the possibility of further absorption.
B) EMESIS/ NOT RECOMMENDED - 1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for seizures.
C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL - 1) Activated charcoal is not recommended for prehospital management of camphor ingestions.
6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
A) DILUTION 1) Solutions greater than 5 percent phenol may damage the esophageal mucosa, and dilution with water or milk has been recommended, but is controversial since dilution may also enhance absorption of phenol. Even with solutions under 5 percent dilution may be of use, but the benefits need to be weighed against the possibility of further absorption.
B) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED 1) Since seizures may occur suddenly and without warning within a few minutes after ingestion (Gibson et al, 1989), emetics are not recommended.
C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) Because liquid preparations are rapidly absorbed and the benefit of activated charcoal decreases with time, activated charcoal is not routinely recommended (Manoguerra, 2006; Kuffner, 2002). It may be considered if there are significant coingestants involved. 2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
3) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
D) GASTRIC LAVAGE 1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes). a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
2) PRECAUTIONS: a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
3) LAVAGE FLUID: a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
4) COMPLICATIONS: a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
E) NOT RECOMMENDED 1) Giving castor oil to slow phenol absorption from the stomach IS NOT RECOMMENDED. Phenol is soluble in oil, oils may promote the absorption of camphor, and the benefit of treating with castor oil has not been documented by clinical studies.
6.5.3) TREATMENT
A) SEIZURE 1) SUMMARY a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
2) DIAZEPAM a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
4) LORAZEPAM a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
5) PHENOBARBITAL a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
6) OTHER AGENTS a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012): 1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
7) RECURRING SEIZURES a) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents: 1) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
2) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
3) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
4) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
b) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised. c) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003). B) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA 1) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
2) LIDOCAINE a) LIDOCAINE/INDICATIONS 1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek et al, 2010).
b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE 1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest. a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015). c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS 1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS 1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
3) AMIODARONE a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS 1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE 1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE 1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
d) ADVERSE EFFECTS 1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
4) PROCAINAMIDE a) PROCAINAMIDE/INDICATIONS 1) An alternative drug in the treatment of PVCs or recurrent ventricular tachycardia when lidocaine is contraindicated or not effective. It should be avoided when the ingestion involves agents with quinidine-like effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines, chloroquine, antidysrhythmics) and when the ECG reveals QRS widening or QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose(Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
b) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT LOADING DOSE 1) 20 to 50 milligrams/minute IV until dysrhythmia is suppressed or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%), or a total dose of 17 milligrams/kilogram is given (1.2 grams for a 70 kilogram person) (Neumar et al, 2010).
2) ALTERNATIVE DOSING: 100 mg every 5 minutes until dysrhythmia is controlled, or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%) or 17 mg/kg have been given (Neumar et al, 2010).
3) MAXIMUM DOSE: 17 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010).
c) PROCAINAMIDE/CONTROLLED INFUSION 1) In conscious patients, procainamide should be administered as a controlled infusion (20 milligrams/minute) because of the risk of QT prolongation and its hypotensive effects (Link et al, 2015)
d) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT MAINTENANCE DOSE 1) 1 to 4 milligrams/minute via an intravenous infusion (Neumar et al, 2010).
e) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE 1) 15 milligrams/kilogram IV/Intraosseously over 30 to 60 minutes; discontinue if hypotension develops or the QRS widens by 50% (Kleinman et al, 2010).
f) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAINTENANCE DOSE 1) Initiate at 20 mcg/kg/minute and increase in 10 mcg/kg/minute increments every 15 to 30 minutes until desired effect is achieved; up to 80 mcg/kg/minute (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
g) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAXIMUM DOSE 1) 2 grams/day (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
h) MONITORING PARAMETERS 1) ECG, blood pressure, and blood concentrations (Prod Info procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, 2011). Procainamide can produce hypotension and QT prolongation (Link et al, 2015).
i) AVOID 1) Avoid in patients with QT prolongation and CHF (Neumar et al, 2010).
C) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA 1) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA: Determine the methemoglobin concentration and evaluate the patient for clinical effects of methemoglobinemia (ie, dyspnea, headache, fatigue, CNS depression, tachycardia, metabolic acidosis). Treat patients with symptomatic methemoglobinemia with methylene blue (this usually occurs at methemoglobin concentrations above 20% to 30%, but may occur at lower methemoglobin concentrations in patients with anemia, or underlying pulmonary or cardiovascular disorders). Administer oxygen while preparing for methylene blue therapy.
2) METHYLENE BLUE: INITIAL DOSE/ADULT OR CHILD: 1 mg/kg IV over 5 to 30 minutes; a repeat dose of up to 1 mg/kg may be given 1 hour after the first dose if methemoglobin levels remain greater than 30% or if signs and symptoms persist. NOTE: Methylene blue is available as follows: 50 mg/10 mL (5 mg/mL or 0.5% solution) single-dose ampules and 10 mg/1 mL (1% solution) vials. Additional doses may sometimes be required. Improvement is usually noted shortly after administration if diagnosis is correct. Consider other diagnoses or treatment options if no improvement has been observed after several doses. If intravenous access cannot be established, methylene blue may also be given by intraosseous infusion. Methylene blue should not be given by subcutaneous or intrathecal injection. NEONATES: DOSE: 0.3 to 1 mg/kg.
3) Concomitant use of methylene blue with serotonergic drugs, including serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs), triptans, and ergot alkaloids may increase the risk of potentially fatal serotonin syndrome.
D) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE 1) There is little experience with the use of endoscopy, corticosteroids, or surgical therapy after ingestion of concentrated camphor/phenol. The following information is derived from ingestion of other caustic substances. 2) SUMMARY: Obtain consultation concerning endoscopy as soon as possible, and perform endoscopy within the first 24 hours when indicated. 3) INDICATIONS: Endoscopy should be performed in adults with a history of deliberate ingestion, adults with any signs or symptoms attributable to inadvertent ingestion, and in children with stridor, vomiting, or drooling after unintentional ingestion (Crain et al, 1984). Endoscopy should also be performed in children with dysphagia or refusal to swallow, significant oral burns, or abdominal pain after unintentional ingestion (Gaudreault et al, 1983; Nuutinen et al, 1994). Children and adults who are asymptomatic after accidental ingestion do not require endoscopy (Gupta et al, 2001; Lamireau et al, 2001; Gorman et al, 1992). 4) RISKS: Numerous large case series attest to the relative safety and utility of early endoscopy in the management of caustic ingestion. a) REFERENCES: (Dogan et al, 2006; Symbas et al, 1983; Crain et al, 1984a; Gaudreault et al, 1983a; Schild, 1985; Moazam et al, 1987; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989; Previtera et al, 1990; Zargar et al, 1991; Vergauwen et al, 1991; Gorman et al, 1992)
5) The risk of perforation during endoscopy is minimized by (Zargar et al, 1991): a) Advancing across the cricopharynx under direct vision
b) Gently advancing with minimal air insufflation
c) Never retroverting or retroflexing the endoscope
d) Using a pediatric flexible endoscope
e) Using extreme caution in advancing beyond burn lesion areas
f) Most authors recommend endoscopy within the first 24 hours of injury, not advancing the endoscope beyond areas of severe esophageal burns, and avoiding endoscopy during the subacute phase of healing when tissue slough increases the risk of perforation (5 to 15 days after ingestion) (Zargar et al, 1991).
6) GRADING a) Several scales for grading caustic injury exist. The likelihood of complications such as strictures, obstruction, bleeding, and perforation is related to the severity of the initial burn (Zargar et al, 1991):
b) Grade 0 - Normal examination
c) Grade 1 - Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa; strictures unlikely.
d) Grade 2A - Friability, hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, whitish membranes, exudates and superficial ulcerations; strictures unlikely.
e) Grade 2B - Grade 2A plus deep discreet or circumferential ulceration; strictures may develop.
f) Grade 3A - Multiple ulcerations and small scattered areas of necrosis; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
g) Grade 3B - Extensive necrosis through visceral wall; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation, or gastrointestinal bleeding are more likely than with 3A.
7) FOLLOW UP - If burns are found, follow 10 to 20 days later with barium swallow or esophagram. 8) SCINTIGRAPHY - Scans utilizing radioisotope labelled sucralfate (technetium 99m) were performed in 22 patients with caustic ingestion and compared with endoscopy for the detection of esophageal burns. Two patients had minimal residual isotope activity on scanning but normal endoscopy and two patients had normal activity on scan but very mild erythema on endoscopy. Overall the radiolabeled sucralfate scan had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 84% and negative predictive value of 100% for detecting clinically significant burns in this population (Millar et al, 2001). This may represent an alternative to endoscopy, particularly in young children, as no sedation is required for this procedure. Further study is required. 9) MINIPROBE ULTRASONOGRAPHY - was performed in 11 patients with corrosive ingestion . Findings were categorized as grade 0 (distinct muscular layers without thickening, grade I (distinct muscular layers with thickening), grade II (obscured muscular layers with indistinct margins) and grade III (muscular layers that could not be differentiated). Findings were further categorized as to whether the worst appearing image involved part of the circumference (type a) or the whole circumference (type b). Strictures did not develop in patients with grade 0 (5 patients) or grade I (4 patients) lesions. Transient stricture formation developed in the only patient with grade IIa lesions, and stricture requiring repeated dilatation developed in the only patient with grade IIIb lesions (Kamijo et al, 2004). E) CORTICOSTEROID 1) CORROSIVE INGESTION/SUMMARY: The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of caustic ingestion is controversial. Most animal studies have involved alkali-induced injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973). Most human studies have been retrospective and generally involve more alkali than acid-induced injury and small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury. 2) FIRST DEGREE BURNS: These burns generally heal well and rarely result in stricture formation (Zargar et al, 1989; Howell et al, 1992). Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in these patients (Howell et al, 1992). 3) SECOND DEGREE BURNS: Some authors recommend corticosteroid treatment to prevent stricture formation in patients with a second degree, deep-partial thickness burn (Howell et al, 1992). However, no well controlled human study has documented efficacy. Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in patients with a second degree, superficial-partial thickness burn (Caravati, 2004; Howell et al, 1992). 4) THIRD DEGREE BURNS: Some authors have recommended steroids in this group as well (Howell et al, 1992). A high percentage of patients with third degree burns go on to develop strictures with or without corticosteroid therapy and the risk of infection and perforation may be increased by corticosteroid use. Most authors feel that the risk outweighs any potential benefit and routine use is not recommended (Boukthir et al, 2004; Oakes et al, 1982; Pelclova & Navratil, 2005). 5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Include active gastrointestinal bleeding and evidence of gastric or esophageal perforation. Corticosteroids are thought to be ineffective if initiated more than 48 hours after a burn (Howell, 1987). 6) DOSE: Administer daily oral doses of 0.1 milligram/kilogram of dexamethasone or 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram of prednisone. Continue therapy for a total of 3 weeks and then taper (Haller et al, 1971; Marshall, 1979). An alternative regimen in children is intravenous prednisolone 2 milligrams/kilogram/day followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks then tapered (Anderson et al, 1990). 7) ANTIBIOTICS: Animal studies suggest that the addition of antibiotics can prevent the infectious complications associated with corticosteroid use in the setting of caustic burns. Antibiotics are recommended if corticosteroids are used or if perforation or infection is suspected. Agents that cover anaerobes and oral flora such as penicillin, ampicillin, or clindamycin are appropriate (Rosenberg et al, 1953). 8) STUDIES a) ANIMAL 1) Some animal studies have suggested that corticosteroid therapy may reduce the incidence of stricture formation after severe alkaline corrosive injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973a).
2) Animals treated with steroids and antibiotics appear to do better than animals treated with steroids alone (Haller & Bachman, 1964).
3) Other studies have shown no evidence of reduced stricture formation in steroid treated animals (Reyes et al, 1974). An increased rate of esophageal perforation related to steroid treatment has been found in animal studies (Knox et al, 1967).
b) HUMAN 1) Most human studies have been retrospective and/or uncontrolled and generally involve small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury. No study has proven a reduced incidence of stricture formation from steroid use in human caustic ingestions (Haller et al, 1971; Hawkins et al, 1980; Yarington & Heatly, 1963; Adam & Brick, 1982). 2) META ANALYSIS a) Howell et al (1992), analyzed reports concerning 361 patients with corrosive esophageal injury published in the English language literature since 1956 (10 retrospective and 3 prospective studies). No patients with first degree burns developed strictures. Of 228 patients with second or third degree burns treated with corticosteroids and antibiotics, 54 (24%) developed strictures. Of 25 patients with similar burn severity treated without steroids or antibiotics, 13 (52%) developed strictures (Howell et al, 1992).
b) Another meta-analysis of 10 studies found that in patients with second degree esophageal burns from caustics, the overall rate of stricture formation was 14.8% in patients who received corticosteroids compared with 36% in patients who did not receive corticosteroids (LoVecchio et al, 1996).
c) Another study combined results of 10 papers evaluating therapy for corrosive esophageal injury in humans published between January 1991 and June 2004. There were a total of 572 patients, all patients received corticosteroids in 6 studies, in 2 studies no patients received steroids, and in 2 studies, treatment with and without corticosteroids was compared. Of 109 patients with grade 2 esophageal burns who were treated with corticosteroids, 15 (13.8%) developed strictures, compared with 2 of 32 (6.3%) patients with second degree burns who did not receive steroids (Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
3) Smaller studies have questioned the value of steroids (Ferguson et al, 1989; Anderson et al, 1990), thus they should be used with caution. 4) Ferguson et al (1989) retrospectively compared 10 patients who did not receive antibiotics or steroids with 31 patients who received both antibiotics and steroids in a study of caustic ingestion and found no difference in the incidence of esophageal stricture between the two groups (Ferguson et al, 1989). 5) A randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial involving 60 children with lye or acid induced esophageal injury did not find an effect of corticosteroids on the incidence of stricture formation (Anderson et al, 1990). a) These 60 children were among 131 patients who were managed and followed-up for ingestion of caustic material from 1971 through 1988; 88% of them were between 1 and 3 years old (Anderson et al, 1990).
b) All patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy after being randomized to receive either no steroids or a course consisting initially of intravenous prednisolone (2 milligrams/kilogram per day) followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks prior to tapering and discontinuation (Anderson et al, 1990).
c) Six (19%), 15 (48%), and 10 (32%) of those in the treatment group had first, second and third degree esophageal burns, respectively. In contrast, 13 (45%), 5 (17%), and 11 (38%) of the control group had the same levels of injury (Anderson et al, 1990).
d) Ten (32%) of those receiving steroids and 11 (38%) of the control group developed strictures. Four (13%) of those receiving steroids and 7 (24%) of the control group required esophageal replacement. All but 1 of the 21 children who developed strictures had severe circumferential burns on initial esophagoscopy (Anderson et al, 1990).
e) Because of the small numbers of patients in this study, it lacked the power to reliably detect meaningful differences in outcome between the treatment groups (Anderson et al, 1990).
6) ADVERSE EFFECTS a) The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of caustic ingestion in humans has been associated with gastric perforation (Cleveland et al, 1963) and fatal pulmonary embolism (Aceto et al, 1970).
F) SURGICAL PROCEDURE 1) SUMMARY: Initially if severe esophageal burns are found a string may be placed in the stomach to facilitate later dilation. Insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube after confirmation of a circumferential burn may prevent strictures. Dilation is indicated after 2 to 4 weeks if strictures are confirmed. If dilation is unsuccessful colonic intraposition or gastric tube placement may be needed. Early laparotomy should be considered in patients with evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns on endoscopy. 2) STRING - If a second degree or circumferential burn of the esophagus is found a string may be placed in the stomach to avoid false channel and to provide a guide for later dilation procedures (Gandhi et al, 1989). 3) STENT - The insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube or stent immediately after endoscopically proven deep circumferential burns is preferred by some surgeons to prevent stricture formation (Mills et al, 1978; (Wijburg et al, 1985; Coln & Chang, 1986). a) STUDY - In a study of 11 children with deep circumferential esophageal burns after caustic ingestion, insertion of a silicone rubber nasogastric tube for 5 to 6 weeks without steroids or antibiotics was associated with stricture formation in only one case (Wijburg et al, 1989).
4) DILATION - Dilation should be performed at 1 to 4 week intervals when stricture is present(Gundogdu et al, 1992). Repeated dilation may be required over many months to years in some patients. Successful dilation of gastric antral strictures has also been reported (Hogan & Polter, 1986; Treem et al, 1987). 5) COLONIC REPLACEMENT - Intraposition of colon may be necessary if dilation fails to provide an adequate sized esophagus (Chiene et al, 1974; Little et al, 1988; Huy & Celerier, 1988). 6) LAPAROTOMY/LAPAROSCOPY - Several authors advocate laparotomy or laparoscopy in patients with endoscopic evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns to evaluate for the presence of transmural gastric or esophageal necrosis (Cattan et al, 2000; Estrera et al, 1986; Meredith et al, 1988; Wu & Lai, 1993). a) STUDY - In a retrospective study of patients with extensive transmural esophageal necrosis after caustic ingestion, all 4 patients treated in the conventional manner (esophagoscopy, steroids, antibiotics, and repeated evaluation for the occurrence of esophagogastric necrosis and perforation) died while all 3 patients treated with early laparotomy and immediate esophagogastric resection survived (Estrera et al, 1986).
|