MOBILE VIEW  | 

BICALUTAMIDE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal androgen antagonist with no other known endocrine activity.

Specific Substances

    1) ICI 176,334
    2) CAS 90357-06-5

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Bicalutamide is available as 50 mg tablets (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) USES
    1) Bicalutamide is used in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Bicalutamide is used in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Bicalutamide, a non-steroidal antiandrogen, competitively binds to cytosol androgen receptors in the target tissue to inhibit the action of androgens.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is rare.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) In patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide in combination with a LHRH analogue, the predominant adverse effects were hot flashes, pain (including general, back, pelvic and abdominal), asthenia, constipation, infection, nausea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, diarrhea, hematuria, nocturia, and anemia. Other effects included chest pain, headache, flu syndrome, hypertension, elevated liver enzymes, dyspepsia, flatulence, anorexia, vomiting, hyperglycemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, bone pain, myasthenia, arthritis, paresthesia, insomnia, anxiety, depression, cough, pharyngitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, rhinitis, rash, increased sweating, urinary tract infection, gynecomastia, and urinary frequency/retention/incontinence. Reversible fulminant hepatic failure has been reported in one patient following one dose of bicalutamide and believed to be an idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity reaction.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Overdose data are limited. Overdose effects are anticipated to be an extension of adverse effects following therapeutic doses.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Bicalutamide is classified as FDA pregnancy category X and is not indicated for use in women. Embryo-fetal toxicity (ie, reduced anogenital distance and hypospadias) in male offspring has been reported in animal studies. Because bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen and has the potential for causing feminization of a male fetus, pregnant women should be warned of the possible risk to the male fetus.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Plasma concentrations are not readily available or clinically useful in the management of overdose.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status in symptomatic patients.
    C) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant diarrhea and/or vomiting.
    D) Monitor CBC, renal function, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat persistent diarrhea with antidiarrheals and treat nausea and/or vomiting with several antiemetics of different classes. Ensure adequate hydration and correct electrolyte abnormalities.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Severe nausea and vomiting may respond to a combination of agents from different drug classes.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and the airway can be protected.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and the airway can be protected.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway management is unlikely to be necessary following a minor exposure; monitor for dyspnea and wheezing following a significant exposure. Ensure adequate ventilation and perform endotracheal intubation early in patients with severe respiratory distress.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) Treat severe nausea and vomiting with agents from several different classes. Agents to consider: dopamine (D2) receptor antagonists (eg, metoclopramide), phenothiazines (eg, prochlorperazine, promethazine), 5-HT3 serotonin antagonists (eg, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron), benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam), corticosteroids (eg, dexamethasone), and antipsychotics (eg, haloperidol, olanzapine).
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is UNLIKELY to be of value because of the high degree of protein binding (96%).
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: A patient with an inadvertent exposure, that remains asymptomatic can be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with a deliberate overdose, and those who are symptomatic, need to be monitored until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with severe symptoms despite treatment should be admitted.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a regional poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) Symptoms of overdose are similar to reported side effects of the medication. Early symptoms of overdose may be delayed or not evident (ie, particularly myelosuppression), so reliable follow-up is imperative. Patients taking this agent may have severe co-morbidities and may be receiving other drugs that may produce synergistic effects (ie, myelosuppression).
    J) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Absorption: Well-absorbed following oral administration. Protein binding: Highly protein-bound (96%). Metabolism: Bicalutamide undergoes stereospecific metabolism, with the S-isomer being inactive. Excretion: Both parent and metabolites are excreted in the urine.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Includes other agents that may cause hepatotoxicity.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has NOT been established. Doses up to 200 mg/day have been well tolerated. THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: One 50 mg tablet orally once daily (morning or evening). PEDIATRIC: Safety and efficacy have not been established.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Bicalutamide is used in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Bicalutamide, a non-steroidal antiandrogen, competitively binds to cytosol androgen receptors in the target tissue to inhibit the action of androgens.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is rare.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) In patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide in combination with a LHRH analogue, the predominant adverse effects were hot flashes, pain (including general, back, pelvic and abdominal), asthenia, constipation, infection, nausea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, diarrhea, hematuria, nocturia, and anemia. Other effects included chest pain, headache, flu syndrome, hypertension, elevated liver enzymes, dyspepsia, flatulence, anorexia, vomiting, hyperglycemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, bone pain, myasthenia, arthritis, paresthesia, insomnia, anxiety, depression, cough, pharyngitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, rhinitis, rash, increased sweating, urinary tract infection, gynecomastia, and urinary frequency/retention/incontinence. Reversible fulminant hepatic failure has been reported in one patient following one dose of bicalutamide and believed to be an idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity reaction.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Overdose data are limited. Overdose effects are anticipated to be an extension of adverse effects following therapeutic doses.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Bicalutamide has NOT been associated with the light adaptation problems observed during nilutamide therapy.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, hypertension was reported in 8% (34 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (29 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) CHEST PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, chest pain was reported in 8% (34 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily and 8% (34 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, congestive heart failure was reported in 2% to less than 5% of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (n=401) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, myocardial infarction was reported in 2% to less than 5% of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (n=401) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) PERIPHERAL EDEMA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, peripheral edema was reported in 13% (53 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 10% (42 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, dyspnea was reported in 13% (51 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 8% (32 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) COUGH
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, increased cough was reported in 8% (33 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 6% (24 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) BRONCHITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, bronchitis was reported in 6% (24 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 3% (22 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) PHARYNGITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, pharyngitis was reported in 8% (32 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 6% (23 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) PNEUMONIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, pneumonia was reported in 4% (18 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 5% (19 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    F) RHINITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, rhinitis was reported in 4% (15 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 5% (22 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    G) INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) During postmarketing surveillance, interstitial lung disease, including interstitial pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, has been reported in patients who received bicalutamide therapy (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEADACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, headache was reported in 7% (29 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily and 7% (27 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) Dizziness, headache, fatigue or tiredness, and confusion have been reported occasionally during bicalutamide therapy (7% or less) (Kennealey & Furr, 1991; Newling, 1990).
    B) CLOUDED CONSCIOUSNESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, confusion was reported in 2% to less than 5% of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (n=401) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, dizziness was reported in 10% (41 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 9% (35 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) INSOMNIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, insomnia was reported in 7% (27 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 10% (39 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) PARESTHESIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, paresthesia was reported in 8% (31 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 10% (40 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    F) ASTHENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, asthenia was reported in 22% (89 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 21% (87 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    G) ANXIETY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, anxiety was reported in 5% (20 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 2% (9 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea (3% to 8%) and vomiting (4% to 7%) have been reported during monotherapy of prostate cancer with bicalutamide. No dose dependency was noted at doses exceeding 30 milligrams daily (Kennealey & Furr, 1991; Kaisary, 1994; Newling, 1990).
    b) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, vomiting was reported in 6% (24 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 8% (32 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Nausea was reported in 15% (62 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 14% (58 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation (0% to 7%) and diarrhea (2% to 3%) have been reported during monotherapy of prostate cancer with bicalutamide. No dose dependency was noted at doses exceeding 30 milligrams daily (Kennealey & Furr, 1991; Kaisary, 1994; Newling, 1990).
    b) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, constipation was reported in 22% (87 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 17% (69 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) INDIGESTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dyspepsia was reported in up to 2% of patients during monotherapy of prostate cancer (Kennealey & Furr, 1991).
    b) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, dyspepsia was reported in 7% (30 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 6% (23 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, abdominal pain was reported in 11% (46 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily and 11% (46 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, diarrhea was reported in 12% (49 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 26% (107 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    F) FLATULENCE/WIND
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, flatulence was reported in 6% (26 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 5% (22 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    G) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, anorexia was reported in 6% (25 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (29 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In controlled clinical trials, hepatitis or marked increases in liver enzymes resulting in therapy discontinuation were reported in approximately 1% of patients who received bicalutamide (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, an increased liver enzyme test was reported in 7% (30 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 11% (46 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) SERUM ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE RAISED
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, increased alkaline phosphatase was reported in 5% (22 of 401) of patients receiving bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 6% (24 of 407) of patients receiving flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) HEPATIC FAILURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man with prostate cancer developed fulminant hepatic failure following 4 doses of daily bicalutamide and subsequently died from multiorgan failure 8 days after bicalutamide initiation. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the prostate with neuroendocrine and small cell histologic features. He was successfully treated with leuprolide acetate and concomitant bicalutamide as well as a chemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin and etoposide, and radiation therapy. Multiple metastasis were found 5 months after completion of radiotherapy. Bicalutamide was restarted along with cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Upon treatment initiation, hepatic transaminases, total bilirubin, and abdominal computer tomographic (CT) scan were verified as normal. The patient presented to the emergency department 4 days later with complaints of right lower quadrant pain, abdominal distension, and diffuse abdominal tenderness. The patient was admitted to the hospital and bicalutamide was discontinued. Other concurrent medications included: oxycodone-acetaminophen, olmesartan, leuprolide acetate, oxybutynin, and docusate sodium. Acetaminophen levels were undetectable. Liver function panel revealed an AST level of 166 units/L and an ALT level of 111 units/L. The patient's condition continued to worsen despite discontinuation of bicalutamide (AST, 2026 units/L; ALT, 1400 units/L on hospital day 3). The patient died of multiorgan failure on hospital day 4 (8 days after bicalutamide initiation) (O'Bryant et al, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old male with prostate cancer developed fulminant hepatic failure following two doses (50 mg/daily) of bicalutamide. Bilirubin was 333 mmol/L (normal less than 20), AST 1527 IU/L, ALT 2690 IU/L, alkaline phosphatase 181 IU/L, and GGT 121 IU/L. Following supportive therapy the patient improved; hepatic enzymes returned to normal within 2 months. Its suggested that the effects may have been due to an idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity reaction (Dawson et al, 1997).
    1) Schellhammer (1997) refuted the conclusions of this report; the patient had received one month of cyproterone acetate and three months of flutamide therapy prior to beginning bicalutamide. Flutamide is known to cause severe hepatotoxicity and is a more likely etiology of this patients fulminant hepatic failure.

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) URINARY TRACT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, urinary tract infection was reported in 9% (35 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily and 9% (36 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) URINARY INCONTINENCE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, urinary incontinence was reported in 4% (15 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 8% (32 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, urinary retention was reported in 5% (20 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 3% (14 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) INCREASED FREQUENCY OF URINATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, urinary frequency was reported in 6% (23 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (29 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) DYSFUNCTIONAL VOIDING OF URINE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, impaired urinary function was reported in 5% (19 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 4% (15 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    F) NOCTURIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, nocturia was reported in 12% (49 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 14% (55 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    G) BLOOD IN URINE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, hematuria was reported in 12% (48 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 6% (26 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, anemia was reported in 11% (45 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 13% (53 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, rash was reported in 9% (35 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (30 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) Skin rash and/or pruritus have been reported during bicalutamide therapy in up to 6% of prostate cancer patients (Kennealey & Furr, 1991).
    B) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, pruritus was reported in 2% to less than 5% of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (n=401) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) FLUSHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, hot flashes were reported in 53% (211 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 53% (217 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) SWEATING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, sweating was reported in 6% (25 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 5% (20 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PAIN IN PELVIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, pelvic pain was reported in 21% (85 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 17% (70 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) Pelvic or back pain has been reported in 3.4% to 8.5% of prostate cancer patients during monotherapy with oral bicalutamide versus 17.6% of castration patients (Kaisary, 1994) Tyrrell, 1992).
    B) BACKACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, back pain was reported in 25% (102 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 26% (105 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) BONE PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, bone pain was reported in 9% (37 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 11% (43 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    D) ARTHRITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, arthritis was reported in 5% (21 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (29 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    E) MUSCLE WEAKNESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, myasthenia was reported in 7% (27 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 5% (19 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    F) PATHOLOGICAL FRACTURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, pathological fracture was reported in 4% (17 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 8% (32 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISORDER OF ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Breast tenderness (25 to 64%), gynecomastia (23 to 62%) and hot flashes (9 to 24%) were reported during monotherapy with bicalutamide in prostate cancer or benign prostatic hypertrophy patients (Kaisary, 1994; Kennealey & Furr, 1991) Tyrrell, 1992). These effects have, however, only rarely necessitated discontinuation of treatment.
    b) Testosterone and LH serum levels are elevated during monotherapy studies (Kennealey & Furr, 1991).
    B) GYNECOMASTIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, gynecomastia was reported in 9% (36 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (30 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) In clinical trials, gynecomastia has been reported in up to 38% of patients receiving bicalutamide 150 mg as a single agent for prostate cancer (unapproved use) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    C) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a multicenter, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer, hyperglycemia was reported in 6% (26 of 401) of patients who received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily compared with 7% (27 of 407) of patients who received flutamide 250 mg 3 times daily. Both bicalutamide and flutamide were given in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) During postmarketing surveillance, hypersensitivity reactions, including angioneurotic edema and urticaria, have been uncommonly reported in patients who received bicalutamide therapy (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Bicalutamide is classified as FDA pregnancy category X and is not indicated for use in women. Embryo-fetal toxicity (ie, reduced anogenital distance and hypospadias) in male offspring has been reported in animal studies. Because bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen and has the potential for causing feminization of a male fetus, pregnant women should be warned of the possible risk to the male fetus.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In reproductive toxicology studies, male offspring of rats receiving doses of bicalutamide of 10 mg/kg/day (plasma concentrations in rats equal to approximately 2/3 human therapeutic concentrations) and above were observed to have reduced anogenital distances and hypospadias (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    2) There were no other teratogenic effects observed in rabbits receiving doses up to 200 mg/kg/day (approximately 1/3 human therapeutic concentrations) or rats receiving doses up to 250 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times human therapeutic concentrations) (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified bicalutamide as FDA Pregnancy Category X (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    2) Bicalutamide is not indicated for use in women and may cause fetal harm if administered to a pregnant woman. Animal studies have demonstrated reduced anogenital distance and hypospadias in male offspring when administered during the gestational period. If bicalutamide is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking bicalutamide, she should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) No human or animal studies of bicalutamide use during lactation have been published, and there are no reports of inadvertent exposure during breastfeeding. Since bicalutamide has no indication for use in women (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015), well-controlled studies are not expected.
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) SPERMATOGENESIS
    1) The long-term effects of bicalutamide on male fertility have not been studied. The manufacturer states that there is the potential for inhibition of spermatogenesis with bicalutamide administration (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) LACK OF EFFECT: In male rats administered bicalutamide 250 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times human therapeutic concentrations), precoital interval and time to successful mating were increased in the first pairing, but there were no effects on fertility reported following successful mating. By 7 weeks after discontinuation of an 11-week bicalutamide dosing period, the effects were reversed (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    2) In female rats administered bicalutamide 10, 50 and 250 mg/kg/day (approximately 2/3, 1, and 2 times human therapeutic concentrations, respectively), no effects on the pregnant females or their female offspring were observed. However, at all dose levels of bicalutamide administered to the pregnant female rats resulted in feminization of the male offspring leading to hypospadias and impotence (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015)

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) NEOPLASM
    1) Leydig cell hyperplasia has been identified in 5 prostate cancer patients following prolonged administration of bicalutamide (50 milligrams once daily for at least 7 months). The ultrastructural appearance of the Leydig cells, however, in these patients were normal (Bjerklund Johansen et al, 1994).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) NEOPLASM
    1) Two-year oral carcinogenicity studies were conducted in both male and female rats and mice at doses of 5, 15 or 75 milligrams/kilogram/day of bicalutamide (Prod Info Casodex(R), bicalutamide, 1998).
    a) A variety of tumor target organ effects were identified and attributed to the antiandrogenicity of bicalutamide, namely, testicular benign interstitial (Leydig) cell tumors in male rats at all dose levels and uterine adenocarcinoma in female rats at 75 milligrams/kilogram/day (Prod Info Casodex(R), bicalutamide, 1998).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Plasma concentrations are not readily available or clinically useful in the management of overdose.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status in symptomatic patients.
    C) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant diarrhea and/or vomiting.
    D) Monitor CBC, renal function, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with severe symptoms despite treatment should be admitted.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) A patient with an inadvertent exposure, that remains asymptomatic can be managed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a regional poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with a deliberate overdose, and those who are symptomatic, need to be monitored until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.

Monitoring

    A) Plasma concentrations are not readily available or clinically useful in the management of overdose.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status in symptomatic patients.
    C) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant diarrhea and/or vomiting.
    D) Monitor CBC, renal function, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat persistent diarrhea with antidiarrheals and treat nausea and/or vomiting with several antiemetics of different classes. Ensure adequate hydration and correct electrolyte abnormalities.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Severe nausea and vomiting may respond to a combination of agents from different drug classes.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Plasma concentrations are not readily available or clinically useful in the management of overdose.
    2) Monitor vital signs and mental status in symptomatic patients.
    3) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant diarrhea and/or vomiting.
    4) Monitor CBC, renal function, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    5) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    C) VOMITING
    1) SUMMARY
    a) TREATMENT OF BREAKTHROUGH NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) Treat patients with high-dose dopamine (D2) receptor antagonists (eg, metoclopramide), phenothiazines (eg, prochlorperazine, promethazine), 5-HT3 serotonin antagonists (eg, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron), benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam), corticosteroids (eg, dexamethasone), and antipsychotics (eg, haloperidol); diphenhydramine may be required to prevent dystonic reactions from dopamine antagonists, phenothiazines, and antipsychotics. It may be necessary to treat with multiple concomitant agents, from different drug classes, using alternating schedules or alternating routes. In general, rectal medications should be avoided in patients with neutropenia.
    2) DOPAMINE RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS: Metoclopramide: Adults: 10 to 40 mg orally or IV and then every 4 or 6 hours, as needed. Dose of 2 mg/kg IV every 2 to 4 hours for 2 to 5 doses may also be given. Monitor for dystonic reactions; add diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg orally or IV every 4 to 6 hours as needed for dystonic reactions (None Listed, 1999). Children: 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg IV every 6 hours; MAXIMUM: 10 mg/dose (Dupuis & Nathan, 2003).
    3) PHENOTHIAZINES: Prochlorperazine: Adults: 25 mg suppository as needed every 12 hours or 10 mg orally or IV every 4 or 6 hours as needed; Children (2 yrs or older): 20 to 29 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 1 to 2 times daily (MAX 7.5 mg/day); 30 to 39 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 2 to 3 times daily (MAX 10 mg/day); 40 to 85 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 3 times daily or 5 mg orally twice daily (MAX 15 mg/day) OR 2 yrs or older and greater than 20 pounds: 0.06 mg/pound IM as a single dose (Prod Info COMPAZINE(R) tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup, 2004; Prod Info Compazine(R), 2002). Promethazine: Adults: 12.5 to 25 mg orally or IV every 4 hours; Children (2 yr and older) 12.5 to 25 mg OR 0.5 mg/pound orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed (Prod Info promethazine hcl rectal suppositories, 2007). Chlorpromazine: Children: greater than 6 months of age, 0.55 mg/kg orally every 4 to 6 hours, or IV every 6 to 8 hours; max of 40 mg per dose if age is less than 5 years or weight is less than 22 kg (None Listed, 1999).
    4) SEROTONIN 5-HT3 ANTAGONISTS: Dolasetron: Adults: 100 mg orally daily or 1.8 mg/kg IV or 100 mg IV. Granisetron: Adults: 1 to 2 mg orally daily or 1 mg orally twice daily or 0.01 mg/kg (maximum 1 mg) IV or transdermal patch containing 34.3 mg granisetron. Ondansetron: Adults: 16 mg orally or 8 mg IV daily (Kris et al, 2006; None Listed, 1999); Children (older than 3 years of age): 0.15 mg/kg IV 4 and 8 hours after chemotherapy (None Listed, 1999).
    5) BENZODIAZEPINES: Lorazepam: Adults: 1 to 2 mg orally or IM/IV every 6 hours; Children: 0.05 mg/kg, up to a maximum of 3 mg, orally or IV every 8 to 12 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).
    6) STEROIDS: Dexamethasone: Adults: 10 to 20 mg orally or IV every 4 to 6 hours; Children: 5 to 10 mg/m(2) orally or IV every 12 hours as needed; methylprednisolone: children: 0.5 to 1 mg/kg orally or IV every 12 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).
    7) ANTIPSYCHOTICS: Haloperidol: Adults: 1 to 4 mg orally or IM/IV every 6 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) As bicalutamide is protein bound and extensively metabolized, dialysis may not be useful as treatment for overdose (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has NOT been established. Doses up to 200 mg/day have been well tolerated. THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: One 50 mg tablet orally once daily (morning or evening). PEDIATRIC: Safety and efficacy have not been established.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER
    1) ADULT: The recommended dose for bicalutamide therapy in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog is one 50 mg tablet orally once daily (morning or evening) (Prod Info bicalutamide oral tablets, 2011)..
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER
    1) PEDIATRIC: Safety and efficacy have not been established (Prod Info bicalutamide oral tablets, 2011).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) Long-term clinical trials have been conducted with doses up to 200 mg daily being well tolerated (Prod Info CASODEX(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES

Physical Characteristics

    A) It is a fine white to off-white powder (Prod Info Casodex(R), bicalutamide, 1998)

Molecular Weight

    A) 430.37 (Prod Info Casodex(R), bicalutamide, 1998)

General Bibliography

    1) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    2) Bjerklund Johansen TE, Majak M, & Nesland JM: Testicular histology after treatment with the new antiandrogen Casodex for carcinoma of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1994; 28:67-70.
    3) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    4) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    5) Dawson LA, Chow E, & Morton G: Case Report: Fulminant hepatic failure associated with bicalutamide. Urology 1997; 49:283-284.
    6) Dupuis LL & Nathan PC: Options for the prevention and management of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children. Paediatr Drugs 2003; 5(9):597-613.
    7) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    8) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    9) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    10) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    11) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    12) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    13) Kaisary AV: Current clinical studies with a new nonsteroidal antiandrogen, Casodex. Prostate Suppl 1994; 5:27-33.
    14) Kennealey GT & Furr BJA: Use of the nonsteroidal anti-androgen Casodex in advanced prostatic carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1991; 18:99-110.
    15) Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(18):2932-2947.
    16) Newling DWW: The response of advanced prostatic cancer to a new non-steroidal antiandrogen: results of a multicenter open phase II study of Casodex. Eur Urol 1990; 18(suppl):18-21.
    17) None Listed: ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on the Pharmacologic Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Adult and Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy or Undergoing Surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56(8):729-764.
    18) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    19) O'Bryant CL, Flaig TW, & Utz KJ: Bicalutamide-associated fulminant hepatotoxicity. Pharmacotherapy 2008; 28(8):1071-1075.
    20) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    21) Product Information: CASODEX(R) oral tablets, bicalutamide oral tablets. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (per FDA), Wilmington, DE, 2015.
    22) Product Information: COMPAZINE(R) tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup, prochlorperazine tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
    23) Product Information: Casodex(R), bicalutamide. Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE, 1998.
    24) Product Information: Compazine(R), prochlorperazine maleate spansule. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
    25) Product Information: bicalutamide oral tablets, bicalutamide oral tablets. Northstar Rx LLC, Memphis, TN, 2011.
    26) Product Information: promethazine hcl rectal suppositories, promethazine hcl rectal suppositories. Perrigo, Allegan, MI, 2007.
    27) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    28) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    29) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Pharamaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    30) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    31) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.