MOBILE VIEW  | 

ZIPEPROL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Zipeprol is a piperazine, non-opiate centrally-acting antitussive with anticholinergic peripheral action on bronchial spasm and mucolytic activity. At high doses, zipeprol is a weak opioid agonist.

Specific Substances

    1) 1-Piperazineethanol, 4-(2-methoxy-2-phenylethyl)
    2) -A-(methoxyphenyl-methyl)
    3) 4-(2-methoxy-2-phenylethyl)-A-(methoxyphenylmethyl)
    4) -1-piperazineethanol
    5) A-(A-methoxybenzyl)-4,-(B-methoxyphenethyl)-1-
    6) piperazineethanol
    7) 3024 CERM
    8) CERM-3024
    9) Molecular Formula: C23-H32-N2-O3.2HCl
    10) CAS 34758-83-3 (zipeprol)
    11) CAS 34758-84-4 (zipeprol hydrochloride)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C23H32N2O3

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Zipeprol is available internationally as 75 mg tablets, 50 mg and 150 mg suppositories, 15 mg/5 mL and 25 mg/5 mL syrup. The tablet form was withdrawn from the market in France in 1990 (pp 5-13).
    B) USES
    1) Zipeprol is used as a centrally acting cough suppressant (S Sweetman , 2001).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Acute and chronic overdose effects may consist of tachycardia, generalized seizures followed by coma, choreic movements, restlessness, somnolence, muscle weakness, ataxia, and toxic psychosis.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Warm red skin, decreased sweating, dry oral mucous membranes, and widely dilated pupils are common anticholinergic effects and may be seen following zipeprol overdoses.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachycardia and hypertension are common anticholinergic effects. Cutaneous vasodilation may occur. Life-threatening dysrhythmias and cardiorespiratory arrest have occurred rarely from anticholinergic poisoning, but have not been reported with zipeprol.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Respiratory depression and aspiration may occur in severe overdoses. Pulmonary edema has been reported following a fatal overdose.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Muscular weakness, ataxia, lethargy, choreiform movements, seizures, and coma may be noted. Seizures and dystonic reactions may occur at lower doses. Severe poisoning may produce coma, medullary paralysis, and death. Cerebral edema has been reported.
    2) Toxic psychosis (disorientation, delirium, hallucinations, and paranoia associated with anxiety, agitation, and hyperactivity) has been reported.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Decreased gastric motility, diminished bowel sounds, and paralytic ileus may occur as a result of anticholinergic toxicity.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Urinary retention may occur.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Warm red skin with decreased sweating is common.
    0.2.18) PSYCHIATRIC
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Personality disorders have been reported as a consequence of zipeprol abuse.
    2) Hallucinations as a result of toxic psychosis have occurred, especially with zipeprol chronic abuse.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Zipeprol may cross the placental barrier resulting in toxic effects on the neonate.
    0.2.22) OTHER
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Zipeprol has an abuse potential. A dependence and withdrawal syndrome may occur with chronic use.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) The value of plasma zipeprol monitoring has not been established. Due to extensive metabolism in the liver or gut wall before entering the general circulation, plasma concentrations are low.
    B) Monitor renal and liver function tests in patients with severe exposures. Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or seizures.
    C) Monitor ECG following significant exposures. Overdoses may be associated with tachycardia or severe arrhythmias.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    a) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    D) SEIZURES -
    1) SEIZURES: Administer a benzodiazepine; DIAZEPAM (ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed. CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed) or LORAZEPAM (ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist. CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue).
    a) Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures recur after diazepam 30 mg (adults) or 10 mg (children greater than 5 years).
    b) Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.
    E) DYSTONIC REACTIONS
    1) DYSTONIC REACTION: ADULT: BENZTROPINE: 1 to 4 mg once or twice daily IV or IM (max, 6 mg/day); 1 to 2 mg of the injection will usually provide quick relief in emergency situations, OR DIPHENHYDRAMINE: ADULT: 10 to 50 mg IV at a rate not exceeding 25 mg/minute or deep IM (max, 100 mg/dose; 400 mg/day). CHILDREN: Diphenhydramine: 5 mg/kg/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day IV divided into 4 doses at a rate not to exceed 25 mg/min, or deep IM (max,, 300 mg/day). Not recommended in premature infants and neonates.
    F) ANXIETY/AGITATION
    1) Intravenous benzodiazepines may be used to control agitation.
    G) HYPERTENSION
    1) HYPERTENSION: Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension (no end organ damage), pharmacologic treatment is generally not necessary. Sedation with benzodiazepines may be helpful in agitated patients with hypertension and tachycardia. For severe hypertension sodium nitroprusside is preferred. Labetalol, nitroglycerin, and phentolamine are alternatives. See main treatment section for doses.
    H) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    I) HYPERTHERMIA
    1) Hyperthermia should be managed with external cooling. Avoid phenothiazines.
    J) PHYSOSTIGMINE
    1) PHYSOSTIGMINE
    a) Physostigmine is indicated to reverse the CNS effects caused by clinical or toxic dosages of agents capable of producing anticholinergic syndrome; however, long lasting reversal of anticholinergic signs and symptoms is generally not achieved because of the relatively short duration of action of physostigmine (45 to 60 minutes). It is most often used diagnostically to distinguish anticholinergic delirium from other causes of altered mental status. CAUTION: If tricyclic antidepressants are coingested, physostigmine may precipitate seizures and dysrhythmias.
    b) ADULT: 2 mg IV at a slow controlled rate, no more than 1 mg/min. May repeat doses at intervals of 10 to 30 min if severe symptoms recur. For patients with prolonged anticholinergic delirium consider a continuous infusion, start at 2 mg/hr and titrate to effect. CHILD: 0.02 mg/kg by slow IV injection, at a rate no more than 0.5 mg/minute. Repeat dosage at 5 to 10 minute intervals as long as the toxic effect persists and there is no sign of cholinergic effects. MAXIMUM DOSAGE: 2 mg total.
    K) TACHYCARDIA
    1) Sinus tachyarrhythmias do not need to be routinely treated (slowed) unless the patient demonstrates signs and/or symptoms of hemodynamic instability. Tachyarrhythmias may respond to physostigmine or IV propranolol.
    L) DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) LIDOCAINE: ADULT: LOADING DOSE: 1 to 1.5 milligram/kilogram via IV push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram. Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest. INFUSION: Once circulation is restored begin an infusion of 1 to 4 mg/min. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute). PEDIATRIC: LOADING DOSE: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute. Monitor ECG continuously.
    M) FLUID/ELECTROLYTES -
    1) MONITOR FLUID AND ELECTROLYTES - carefully in symptomatic patients.
    N) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) MONITOR RENAL FUNCTION - tests in symptomatic patients.
    O) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) RHABDOMYOLYSIS: Administer sufficient 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) to maintain urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hr). Monitor input and output, serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function. Diuretics may be necessary to maintain urine output, but should only be considered if urine output is inadequate after volume status is restored. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    P) NALOXONE
    1) Naloxone precipitates withdrawal in zipeprol abusers and might reverse mental status depression in zipeprol overdose.
    2) ADULT AND PEDIATRIC DOSE - Administer an initial dose of 0.4 to 2.0 mg intravenously and repeat as needed to reverse signs and symptoms of toxicity.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) ADULTS - Toxic zipeprol dose is reported to be 800 mg, and a dose causing seizures is reported to be 750 to 1500 mg. Average overdoses in 7 fatalities were 1500 to 3000 mg.
    B) PEDIATRICS - Toxic zipeprol dose is reported to be 15 to 20 mg/kg, and doses resulting in seizures are reported to be greater than 25 mg/kg.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Decreased gastric motility, diminished bowel sounds, and paralytic ileus may occur as a result of anticholinergic toxicity.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DRUG-INDUCED ILEUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Decreased gastric motility and diminished bowel sounds commonly occur with zipeprol overdose or abuse (Janiri et al, 1991; Tempesta et al, 1990).
    b) Constipation was reported to occur in approximately 46% of zipeprol abusers (from 30 patients) (Janiri et al, 1991).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Urinary retention may occur.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Janiri et al (1991) report that 41.6% of zipeprol abusers (from 30 patients) experienced chronic urinary retention.

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Warm red skin with decreased sweating is common.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VASODILATATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Warm red skin with decreased sweating or dry skin is common and is a peripheral anticholinergic effect (Janiri et al, 1991).
    b) Janiri et al (1991) report approximately 71% of chronic zipeprol abusers (from 30 patients) experienced warm red skin.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anticholinergic toxicity has been associated with the development of rhabdomyolysis (Donovan & Britt, 1993). Although not yet reported with zipeprol, prolonged and untreated generalized seizures may result in the development of rhabdomyolysis.

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Zipeprol may cross the placental barrier resulting in toxic effects on the neonate.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME
    1) CASE REPORT - A 27-year-old female chronic zipeprol abuser, who ingested 1-2 grams daily throughout her pregnancy, gave birth to a small infant with no gross developmental defects. Within hours of birth the infant was noted to be irritable and by day 2 exhibited multiple signs of an abstinence syndrome (Slobodkin et al, 1992).
    a) Signs included irritability, high pitched cry, fist sucking, jitteriness, and a low-grade fever. A CT scan on day 3 revealed bilateral cerebral echogenic areas probably consistent with leukoencephelomalacia. A week later the scan was normal. At 4 weeks of age the infant was noted to have a soft systolic cardiac murmur. Hematocrit at that time was 31% and the infant was treated with oral iron supplements.
    b) Symptoms of drug withdrawal continued with minimal improvement into the 5th week of life. By age 6 months, the infant had gained weight poorly, probably due to several upper respiratory infections. Developmental performance was appropriate for age.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Acute and chronic overdose effects may consist of tachycardia, generalized seizures followed by coma, choreic movements, restlessness, somnolence, muscle weakness, ataxia, and toxic psychosis.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) HYPERTHERMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Janiri et al (1991) reported that 10 of 30 (33%) zipeprol abusers experienced hyperthermia.
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) TACHYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachycardia was reported in 26 of 30 (87%) patients abusing zipeprol (Tempesta et al, 1990; Janiri et al, 1991).

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Warm red skin, decreased sweating, dry oral mucous membranes, and widely dilated pupils are common anticholinergic effects and may be seen following zipeprol overdoses.
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) MIOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seventy-five percent of chronic zipeprol abusers in one study report miosis (Janiri et al, 1991).
    B) CONJUNCTIVITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Approximately 50% of zipeprol abusers have experienced conjunctival hyperemia (Janiri et al, 1991; Tempesta et al, 1990).
    C) NYSTAGMUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nystagmus has been reported with piperazine exposures and may occur with zipeprol (S Sweetman , 2001).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) SUMMARY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dry mouth may occur as a result of a decrease in secretions from salivary glands. A reduction of secretions in the pharynx, bronchi, and nasal passages may also be noted.
    B) DRY MOUTH
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tempesta et al (1990) reported that 29 of 30 (96%) of zipeprol abusers experienced dry mouth and throat.
    C) THIRST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Increased thirst was reported in 24 of 30 (79%) zipeprol abusers (Janiri et al, 1991; Tempesta et al, 1990).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachycardia and hypertension are common anticholinergic effects. Cutaneous vasodilation may occur. Life-threatening dysrhythmias and cardiorespiratory arrest have occurred rarely from anticholinergic poisoning, but have not been reported with zipeprol.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hypertension is a common anticholinergic effect and may be delayed in onset and cyclical (Weisman & Goldfrank, 1994).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) While zipeprol has some anticholinergic effects, hypertension has not yet been reported in overdose.
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tempesta et al (1990) reported that 26 of 30 (87%) of adult zipeprol abusers experienced mild to moderate tachycardia.
    b) A 21-year-old male who ingested 100 mg exhibited only drowsiness and tachycardia (Kintz et al, 1993).
    c) Supraventricular and ventricular tachydysrhythmias may occur in acute toxic ingestions of anticholinergics. Atrial and ventricular tachycardias are a result of peripheral anticholinergic actions (Weisman & Goldfrank, 1994). Although not yet reported, zipeprol has the potential to cause these effects based on its mechanisms of action.
    C) VASODILATATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Janiri et al (1991) reported that 21 of 30 (71%) of zipeprol abusers experienced cutaneous vasodilation and flushing.

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Respiratory depression and aspiration may occur in severe overdoses. Pulmonary edema has been reported following a fatal overdose.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT - A 25-year-old male was found to have non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema following a fatal overdose of zipeprol. No other morphological changes were noted (Kintz et al, 1994).
    B) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Overdoses in children have resulted in respiratory depression and coma (S Sweetman , 2001).
    b) CASE REPORT - Perraro & Beorchia (1984) report the need for mechanical ventilation in one case of overdose after evidence of seizures and cerebral edema.
    3.6.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION
    a) In dogs, continuous zipeprol infusions of 2mg/kg/min resulted in respiratory depression at toxic levels with death resulting from respiratory arrest (Rispat et al, 1976). The authors speculate this respiratory depressant effect to be due to the local anesthetic properties of zipeprol.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Piperazine, of which zipeprol is a derivative, can undergo mononitrosation in the stomach to produce N-mononitrosopiperazine, a potential carcinogen (Bellander et al, 1981). There is no direct proof of a causal role in the etiology of specific human disease (Tannenbaum, 1983).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Muscular weakness, ataxia, lethargy, choreiform movements, seizures, and coma may be noted. Seizures and dystonic reactions may occur at lower doses. Severe poisoning may produce coma, medullary paralysis, and death. Cerebral edema has been reported.
    2) Toxic psychosis (disorientation, delirium, hallucinations, and paranoia associated with anxiety, agitation, and hyperactivity) has been reported.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Generalized seizures and dystonic reactions are common clinical findings in zipeprol overdoses as well as in zipeprol abusers.
    b) CASE SERIES - In a series of 256 zipeprol overdoses, seizures were reported in 5.5% of the cases. Doses causing seizures in adults were reported to be 1.5 grams and doses causing seizures in children were greater than 25 mg/kg (pp 5-13).
    c) CASE REPORTS - Moroni et al (1984) report 11 adult cases of acute overdoses or accumulative effects of zipeprol abuse all presenting with generalized seizures leading to coma. Two EEGs were normal and 9 EEGs showed diffuse 6-7 Hz spikes, spike-wave bursts, and slow theta wave activity.
    d) CASE REPORT - A 7-year-old child experienced generalized seizures followed by choreic movements after receiving 1-2 mg/kg orally for 8 days (Moroni et al, 1984).
    e) CASE REPORT - Perraro & Beorchia (1984) report a case of a 17-year-old female who presented to the ED with a probable seizure crisis after ingestion of 975 mg zipeprol. Her EEG was normal and she was discharged following recovery.
    f) CASE REPORT - A 17-year-old male was transported to the ED following a grand mal seizure after ingestion of 750 mg zipeprol. He was a chronic zipeprol abuser. EEG revealed non-specific changes (Perraro & Beorchia, 1984).
    g) CASE SERIES - Ritchie et al (1996) report 15 patients presenting with symptoms, including seizures, related to zipeprol; all seizures were discrete and not recurrent.
    B) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT - Cerebral edema has been reported in an overdose of 750 mg in a 17-year-old male abuser of zipeprol. A CT scan showed an area of diffuse hypodensity in the right hemisphere. Treatment consisted of mechanical ventilation and dexamethasone. Eight days after admission a repeat CT scan of the brain was normal (Perraro & Beorchia, 1984).
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures leading to coma is a frequent effect of zipeprol overdose (Baselt, 2000). Severe and prolonged coma may be accompanied by medullary paralysis. Moroni et al (1984) report 11 adult patients admitted to the ED with coma following generalized seizures. CT scans were abnormal in 9 of these cases, but returned to normal after 3 to 6 months.
    D) DYSKINESIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHOREOATHETOSIS
    1) CASE REPORT - A 7-year-old child developed generalized seizures followed by choreic movements and forced right deviation of the head and eyes following zipeprol doses of 1-2 mg/kg for 8 days. EEG revealed left parietotemporal prevalence of paroxysmal activity (Moroni et al, 1984).
    b) GAIT ABNORMAL
    1) CASE REPORT - A 2-year-old child who ingested 154 mg/kg for 3 days presented with abnormalities of posture and gait. EEG revealed paroxysmal bilateral activity and CT scan was normal (Moroni et al, 1984).
    c) OPISTHOTONOS
    1) CASE REPORT - A 17-year-old male abuser of zipeprol presented to the ED with several opisthotonic crises after ingesting 750 mg zipeprol. He was unconscious with a diffuse hypertonus and positive Babinski sign prior to the opisthotonus. Cerebral edema was diagnosed following a CT scan. Recovery occurred after approximately 8 days (Perraro & Beorchia, 1984).
    E) ATAXIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Muscular weakness, ataxia and incoordination (dropping objects), vertigo, lethargy and paresthesias may be present following overdoses or chronic zipeprol abuse (Moroni et al, 1984; Janiri et al, 1991).
    b) Clinical effects of overdoses in children have included restlessness, somnolence, ataxia, and vertigo (Moroni et al, 1984; S Sweetman , 2001).
    c) Janiri et al (1991) report approximately 52% of chronic zipeprol abusers experience ataxia and 37% experience dizziness.
    F) PSYCHOTIC DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Toxic psychosis (disorientation, delirium, hallucinations, and paranoia associated with anxiety, agitation, and hyperactivity) has been reported with anticholinergic overdoses and may be expected to be seen with zipeprol intoxications (Baselt, 2000) Weisman & Goldfrank, 1994; (Janiri et al, 1991).
    b) Visual hallucinations have been reported in approximately 91% of zipeprol abusers, auditory hallucinations in 65% and tactile dysperceptions in 35% (Janiri et al, 1991).
    1) The visual hallucinations were described as vivid, clear and well defined. The visualized objects were mostly moving animals, especially cats and insects. The image was usually seen at a distance of 6 to 7 meters from the observer. Auditory hallucinations generally consisted of music and voices. Tactile perceptions included paresthesias and sensations of muscular stretching.
    c) CASE REPORT - Moroni et al (1984) report restlessness as the only adverse effect following an acute zipeprol overdose of 27 mg/kg in a 2-year-old child. EEG was normal.
    d) CASE REPORT - A 17-year-old female zipeprol abuser was admitted to the ED following a 900 mg overdose with a diagnosis of confusional state. EEG was normal. Following gastric lavage, full recovery occurred (Perraro & Beorchia, 1984).
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) SEIZURES
    a) RHESUS MONKEYS - Zipeprol induced tonic-clonic seizures in monkeys when administered subcutaneous doses of 10 to 18 mg/kg. Zipeprol probably has a small margin of safety since the recommended therapeutic daily dose in humans is 2 to 5 mg/kg orally (Acteo et al, 1996).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) The value of plasma zipeprol monitoring has not been established. Due to extensive metabolism in the liver or gut wall before entering the general circulation, plasma concentrations are low.
    B) Monitor renal and liver function tests in patients with severe exposures. Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or seizures.
    C) Monitor ECG following significant exposures. Overdoses may be associated with tachycardia or severe arrhythmias.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) The usefulness of therapeutic serum levels has not been established.
    2) Monitor creatine phosphokinase levels in patients with prolonged coma or seizures.
    3) Monitor serum renal function tests in severe exposures.
    4) Monitor serum liver function tests in severe exposures.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) OTHER
    1) Monitor urine myoglobin in patients with rhabdomyolysis.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Monitor ECG for signs of tachycardia or abnormal cardiac rhythms.

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Obtain a chest x-ray in patients with severe respiratory or CNS depression.

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Zipeprol can be analyzed in human tissues and fluids by GC/mass spectrometry with nitrogen-selective or mass spectrometric detection (Baselt, 2000; Kintz et al, 1993; Crippa et al, 1990).
    2) Kintz et al (1994) used a capillary gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method to quantify zipeprol in biological fluids and tissues in a death following a zipeprol overdose.
    3) Beckett & Achari (1977) describe a gas liquid chromatography method of determining zipeprol in urine and plasma.
    B) OTHER
    1) Hair analysis has been used to quantify zipeprol in order to determine drug intake of an addict over a period longer than 6 months (Kintz et al, 1994). This method is not effective in acute overdoses.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) The value of plasma zipeprol monitoring has not been established. Due to extensive metabolism in the liver or gut wall before entering the general circulation, plasma concentrations are low.
    B) Monitor renal and liver function tests in patients with severe exposures. Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or seizures.
    C) Monitor ECG following significant exposures. Overdoses may be associated with tachycardia or severe arrhythmias.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    2) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    3) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    4) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    B) DRUG-INDUCED DYSTONIA
    1) ADULT
    a) BENZTROPINE: 1 to 4 mg once or twice daily intravenously or intramuscularly; maximum dose: 6 mg/day; 1 to 2 mg of the injection will usually provide quick relief in emergency situations (Prod Info benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, 2009).
    b) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 10 to 50 mg intravenously at a rate not exceeding 25 mg/minute or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 100 mg/dose; 400 mg/day (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    2) CHILDREN
    a) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 5 mg/kg/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day intravenously divided into 4 doses at a rate not to exceed 25 mg/min, or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 300 mg/day. Not recommended in premature infants and neonates (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    C) PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION
    1) INDICATION
    a) If patient is severely agitated, sedate with IV benzodiazepines.
    2) DIAZEPAM DOSE
    a) ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially, repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    3) LORAZEPAM DOSE
    a) ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Manno, 2003).
    b) CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    4) Extremely large doses of benzodiazepines may be required in patients with severe intoxication in order to obtain adequate sedation. Titrate dose to clinical response and monitor for hypotension, CNS and respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation.
    5) Phenothiazines should be avoided due to possible hypotension.
    D) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate hypertension without evidence of end organ damage, pharmacologic intervention is generally not necessary. Sedative agents such as benzodiazepines may be helpful in treating hypertension and tachycardia in agitated patients, especially if a sympathomimetic agent is involved in the poisoning.
    2) For hypertensive emergencies (severe hypertension with evidence of end organ injury (CNS, cardiac, renal), or emergent need to lower mean arterial pressure 20% to 25% within one hour), sodium nitroprusside is preferred. Nitroglycerin and phentolamine are possible alternatives.
    3) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/INDICATIONS
    a) Useful for emergent treatment of severe hypertension secondary to poisonings. Sodium nitroprusside has a rapid onset of action, a short duration of action and a half-life of about 2 minutes (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007) that can allow accurate titration of blood pressure, as the hypertensive effects of drug overdoses are often short lived.
    4) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/DOSE
    a) ADULT: Begin intravenous infusion at 0.1 microgram/kilogram/minute and titrate to desired effect; up to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute may be required (American Heart Association, 2005). Frequent hemodynamic monitoring and administration by an infusion pump that ensures a precise flow rate is mandatory (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). PEDIATRIC: Initial: 0.5 to 1 microgram/kilogram/minute; titrate to effect up to 8 micrograms/kilogram/minute (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    5) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/SOLUTION PREPARATION
    a) The reconstituted 50 mg solution must be further diluted in 250 to 1000 mL D5W to desired concentration (recommended 50 to 200 mcg/mL) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection, 2004). Prepare fresh every 24 hours; wrap in aluminum foil. Discard discolored solution (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    6) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) Severe hypotension; headaches, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps; thiocyanate or cyanide toxicity (generally from prolonged, high dose infusion); methemoglobinemia; lactic acidosis; chest pain or dysrhythmias (high doses) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). The addition of 1 gram of sodium thiosulfate to each 100 milligrams of sodium nitroprusside for infusion may help to prevent cyanide toxicity in patients receiving prolonged or high dose infusions (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    7) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Monitor blood pressure every 30 to 60 seconds at onset of infusion; once stabilized, monitor every 5 minutes. Continuous blood pressure monitoring with an intra-arterial catheter is advised (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    8) NITROGLYCERIN/INDICATIONS
    a) May be used to control hypertension, and is particularly useful in patients with acute coronary syndromes or acute pulmonary edema (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    9) NITROGLYCERIN/ADULT DOSE
    a) Begin infusion at 10 to 20 mcg/min and increase by 5 or 10 mcg/min every 5 to 10 minutes until the desired hemodynamic response is achieved (American Heart Association, 2005). Maximum rate 200 mcg/min (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    10) NITROGLYCERIN/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) Usual Dose: 29 days or Older: 1 to 5 mcg/kg/min continuous IV infusion. Maximum 60 mcg/kg/min (Laitinen et al, 1997; Nam et al, 1989; Rasch & Lancaster, 1987; Ilbawi et al, 1985; Friedman & George, 1985).
    E) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    F) BODY TEMPERATURE ABOVE REFERENCE RANGE
    1) Hyperthermia should be managed with external cooling. Avoid phenothiazines.
    G) PHYSOSTIGMINE
    1) PHYSOSTIGMINE/INDICATIONS
    a) Physostigmine is indicated to reverse the CNS effects caused by clinical or toxic dosages of agents capable of producing anticholinergic syndrome; however, long lasting reversal of anticholinergic signs and symptoms is generally not achieved because of the relatively short duration of action of physostigmine (45 to 60 minutes) (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008). It is most often used diagnostically to distinguish anticholinergic delirium from other causes of altered mental status (Frascogna, 2007; Shannon, 1998).
    b) Physostigmine should not be used in patients with suspected tricyclic antidepressant overdose, or an ECG suggestive of tricyclic antidepressant overdose (eg, QRS widening). In the setting of tricyclic antidepressant overdose, use of physostigmine has precipitated seizures and intractable cardiac arrest (Stewart, 1979; Newton, 1975; Pentel & Peterson, 1980; Frascogna, 2007).
    2) DOSE
    a) ADULT: BOLUS: 2 mg IV at slow controlled rate, no more than 1 mg/min. May repeat doses at intervals of 10 to 30 min, if severe symptoms recur (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008). INFUSION: For patients with prolonged anticholinergic delirium, a continuous infusion of physostigmine may be considered. Starting dose is 2 mg/hr, titrate to effect (Eyer et al, 2008)
    b) CHILD: 0.02 mg/kg by slow IV injection, at a rate no more than 0.5 mg/minute. Repeat dosage at 5 to 10 minute intervals as long as the toxic effect persists and there is no sign of cholinergic effects. MAXIMUM DOSAGE: 2 mg total (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008).
    c) AVAILABILITY: Physostigmine salicylate is available in 2 mL ampules, each mL containing 1 mg of physostigmine salicylate in a vehicle containing sodium metabisulfite 0.1%, benzyl alcohol 2%, and water (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008).
    3) CAUTIONS
    a) Relative contraindications to the use of physostigmine are asthma, gangrene, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, intestinal or urogenital tract mechanical obstruction, peripheral vascular disease, cardiac conduction defects, atrioventricular block, and in patients receiving choline esters and depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (decamethonium, succinylcholine). It may cause anaphylactic symptoms and life-threatening or less severe asthmatic episodes in patients with sulfite sensitivity (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008).
    b) Too rapid IV administration of physostigmine has resulted in bradycardia, hypersalivation leading to respiratory difficulties, and possible seizures (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008).
    4) ATROPINE FOR PHYSOSTIGMINE TOXICITY
    a) Atropine should be available to reverse life-threatening physostigmine-induced, toxic cholinergic effects (Prod Info physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2008; Frascogna, 2007). Atropine may be given at half the dose of previously given physostigmine dose (Daunderer, 1980).
    H) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) Sinus tachyarrhythmias do not need to be routinely treated (slowed) unless the patient demonstrates signs and/or symptoms of hemodynamic instability. Tachyarrhythmias may respond to physostigmine or IV propranolol.
    I) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    a) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    1) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    2) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    J) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE BALANCE REGULATION
    1) MONITOR FLUID AND ELECTROLYTES - carefully in symptomatic patients.
    K) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) MONITOR RENAL FUNCTION - tests in symptomatic patients.
    L) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    2) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    3) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    4) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    5) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).
    6) MANNITOL/INDICATIONS
    a) Osmotic diuretic used in the management of rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria (Zimmerman & Shen, 2013).
    7) RHABDOMYOLYSIS/MYOGLOBINURIA
    a) ADULT: TEST DOSE: (for patients with marked oliguria or those with inadequate renal function) 0.2 g/kg IV as a 15% to 25% solution infused over 3 to 5 minutes to produce a urine flow of at least 30 to 50 mL/hr; a second test dose may be given if urine flow does not increase within 2 to 3 hours. The patient should be reevaluated if there is inadequate response following the second test dose (Prod Info MANNITOL intravenous injection, 2009). TREATMENT DOSE: 50 to 100 g IV as a 15% to 25% solution may be used. The rate should be adjusted to maintain urinary output at 30 to 50 mL/hour (Prod Info mannitol IV injection, urologic irrigation, 2006) OR 300 to 400 mg/kg or up to 100 g IV administered as a single dose (Prod Info MANNITOL intravenous injection, 2009).
    b) PEDIATRIC: Dosing has not been established in patients less than 12 years of age(Prod Info Mannitol intravenous injection, 2009). TEST DOSE (for patients with marked oliguria or those with inadequate renal function): 0.2 g/kg or 6 g/m(2) body surface area IV as a 15% to 25% solution infused over 3 to 5 minutes to produce a urine flow of at least 30 to 50 mL/hr; a second test dose may be given if urine flow does not increase; TREATMENT DOSE: 0.25 to 2 g/kg or 60 g/m(2) body surface area IV as a 15% to 20% solution over 2 to 6 hours; do not repeat dose for persistent oliguria (Prod Info MANNITOL intravenous injection, 2009).
    8) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Fluid and electrolyte imbalance, in particular sodium and potassium; expansion of the extracellular fluid volume leading to pulmonary edema or CHF exacerbations(Prod Info MANNITOL intravenous injection, 2009).
    9) PRECAUTION
    a) Contraindicated in well-established anuria or impaired renal function not responding to a test dose, pulmonary edema, CHF, severe dehydration; caution in progressive oliguria and azotemia; do not add to whole blood for transfusions(Prod Info Mannitol intravenous injection, 2009); enhanced neuromuscular blockade observed with tubocurarine(Miller et al, 1976).
    10) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Renal function, urine output, fluid balance, serum potassium, serum sodium, and serum osmolality (Prod Info Mannitol intravenous injection, 2009).
    M) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
    a) Cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may occur. Emergent management includes head elevation and administration of mannitol; hyperventilation should be performed if there is evidence of impending herniation.
    2) MONITORING
    a) Patients will usually require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Monitor intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow.
    3) TREATMENT
    a) Most information on the treatment of cerebral edema is derived from studies of traumatic brain injury.
    4) MANNITOL
    a) ADULT/PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.25 to 1 gram/kilogram intravenously over 10 to 15 minutes (None Listed, 2000).
    b) AVAILABLE FORMS: Mannitol injection (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%).
    c) MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS: Congestive heart failure, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, renal failure, pulmonary edema, and allergic reactions.
    d) PRECAUTIONS: Contraindicated in well-established anuria or impaired renal function not responding to a test dose, pulmonary edema, CHF, severe dehydration; caution in progressive oliguria and azotemia. Do not add to whole blood for transfusions; enhanced neuromuscular blockade has occurred with tubocurarine. Keep serum osmolarity below 320 mOsm.
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Renal function, urine output, fluid balance, serum potassium levels, serum osmolarity, and CVP.
    5) HYPERTONIC SALINE
    a) Preliminary studies suggest that hypertonic saline (7.5% saline/6% dextran) 100 ml reduced ICP more effectively than 200 mL of 20% mannitol in adults with elevated ICP after traumatic brain injury(Battison et al, 2005).
    6) ELEVATION
    a) Elevation of the head of the bed to approximately 30 degrees decreases ICP and improves cerebral perfusion pressure (Meixensberger et al, 1997; Schneider et al, 1993; Feldman et al, 1992).
    7) MECHANICAL DECOMPRESSION
    a) Early surgical decompression, ventriculostomy with CSF drainage, or craniectomy may be useful in patients with persistent elevation of ICP (Sahuquillo & Arikan, 2006; Sakai et al, 1998; Polin et al, 1997; Taylor et al, 2001). Most experience with these modalities has been in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    8) HYPERVENTILATION
    a) SUMMARY: Hyperventilation has been associated with adverse outcomes and should not be performed routinely (Muizelaar et al, 1991). It is indicated in patients who have clinical evidence of herniation or if there is intracranial hypertension refractory to sedation, paralysis, CSF drainage and osmotic diuretics (None Listed, 2000a).
    b) RECOMMENDATION:
    1) The PCO2 must be controlled in the range of 25 torr; further lowering of PCO2 may create undesirable effects secondary to local tissue hypoxia.
    2) End-tidal CO2 tension, correlated with an initial ABG measurement, provides a noninvasive means of monitoring PCO2 (Mackersie & Karagianes, 1990).
    3) Most authorities advise that hyperventilation should be considered a temporizing measure only; SUSTAINED hyperventilation should be avoided (Am Acad Neurol, 1997; Bullock et al, 1996; Kirkpatrick, 1997).
    N) NALOXONE
    1) Naloxone precipitates withdrawal in zipeprol abusers (Janiri et al, 1991) and might reverse mental status depression in zipeprol overdose.
    2) ADULT AND PEDIATRIC DOSE - Administer an initial dose of 0.4 to 2.0 mg intravenously and repeat as needed to reverse signs and symptoms of toxicity.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) EFFICACY
    1) Peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis have not been established as effective means of removal of zipeprol.

Summary

    A) ADULTS - Toxic zipeprol dose is reported to be 800 mg, and a dose causing seizures is reported to be 750 to 1500 mg. Average overdoses in 7 fatalities were 1500 to 3000 mg.
    B) PEDIATRICS - Toxic zipeprol dose is reported to be 15 to 20 mg/kg, and doses resulting in seizures are reported to be greater than 25 mg/kg.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) ORAL - The usual oral antitussive dose of zipeprol (tablets) in adults is 150 to 350 milligrams daily in divided doses (Schlesser, 1991; Baselt, 2000).
    2) RECTAL - The adult rectal antitussive dose of zipeprol for the treatment of cough is one 150 milligram suppository once or twice a day (Schlesser, 1991; S Sweetman , 2001).
    3) DOSAGE IN HEPATIC INSUFFICIENCY - Zipeprol is extensively metabolized; only 1% to 5% of a dose is excreted unchanged in the urine (Crippa et al, 1990; Constantin & Pognat, 1978). Although specific guidelines are not available, reduced doses or increased dosing intervals may be indicated in patients with significant hepatic dysfunction.
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) ORAL - The oral pediatric dose of zipeprol is 15 to 30 milligrams/day in divided doses, according to age (Schlesser, 1991), or, alternatively, 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram/day in divided doses for children under 14 years of age (Crippa et al, 1990).
    2) RECTAL - The usual rectal antitussive dose of zipeprol in children is 100 to 150 milligrams/day (suppositories) in divided doses (Schlesser, 1991).
    3) DOSAGE IN HEPATIC INSUFFICIENCY - Zipeprol is extensively metabolized; only 1 to 5% of a dose is excreted unchanged in the urine (Crippa et al, 1990; Constantin & Pognat, 1978). Although specific guidelines are not available, reduced doses or increased dosing intervals may be indicated in patients with significant hepatic dysfunction.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ADULT
    1) In 7 known fatalities due to zipeprol, acute overdosage averaged 1500 to 3000 milligrams (Baselt, 2000).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) CASE SERIES - 256 cases of acute zipeprol poisonings reported to the French Poisons Centres were evaluated for toxic and convulsant doses. Toxic dose in adults was reported to be 800 milligrams and convulsant dose was reported to be 1500 milligrams. Toxic pediatric dose was reported to be 15 to 20 milligrams/kilogram and convulsant dose was reported to be greater than 25 milligrams/kilogram (pp 5-13).
    2) CASE SERIES - Ritchie et al (1996) report doses of 750 to 1500 milligrams have caused seizures.
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT -
    a) A psychotoxic syndrome is manifested following oral doses of not less than 300 milligrams, although abusers of zipeprol may tolerate much higher doses, up to 2250 milligrams or more (Crippa et al, 1990).
    b) Moroni et al (1984) reported on 11 adults admitted to ED with generalized seizures, followed by coma, after ingestion of 11 to 28 milligrams/kilogram as a single dose or as repeated daily doses for 3 to 25 days. Nine of these patients had abnormal EEGs.
    c) Perraro & Beorchia (1984) described 2 zipeprol abusers presenting to ED with toxic syndromes, including seizures and cerebral edema, associated with doses in the range of 750 to 975 milligrams.
    2) PEDIATRIC -
    a) The clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity appear to be less severe in children than in adults. Moroni et al (1984) describe restlessness with a normal EEG in a 2-year-old following an oral dose of 27 milligrams/kilogram.
    b) Abnormal gait and posture were observed in another 2-year-old following an overdose of 154 milligrams/kilogram for 3 consecutive days (Moroni et al, 1984).
    c) Generalized seizures and choreic movements occurred in a 7-year-old following 8 days of 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram orally of zipeprol (Moroni et al, 1984).
    C) ANIMAL DATA
    1) Zipeprol induced tonic-clonic seizures in rhesus monkeys when administered subcutaneous doses of 10 to 18 mg/kg. Zipeprol probably has a small margin of safety since the recommended therapeutic daily dose in humans is 2 to 5 mg/kg orally (Acteo et al, 1996).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) GENERAL
    a) Maximum plasma concentrations of zipeprol in 2 adult males following a 175 milligram oral dose were 0.19 mcg/mL and 0.76 mcg/mL approximately 1 to 2 hours after the dose (Beckett & Achari, 1977).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CASE REPORTS
    a) In 2 adult cases of fatal zipeprol overdose, blood levels of 10.6 and 5.8 micrograms/ milliliter respectively, were measured at postmortem examination (Crippa et al, 1990).
    b) Yoo et al (1994) found blood zipeprol concentrations of 2.3 to 38.3 micrograms/milliliter in postmortem studies from 22 abusers of zipeprol.
    c) Yoo et al (1996) found blood zipeprol concentrations of 1.3 to 28.6 micrograms/milliliter in nine fatal cases of mixed zipeprol and dextromethorphan overdoses.
    d) Chung et al (1998), in a review of 69 zipeprol-related fatalities, found blood concentrations of zipeprol to range from 0.8 to 38.3 micrograms/milliliter in zipeprol and dextromethorphan cases.
    e) Postmortem tissue levels of zipeprol in 4 patients were reported as (Yoo et al, 1994):
    1) Blood: 2.3 to 31.1 mg/L
    2) Lung: 2.4 to 40.2 mg/kg
    3) Liver: 7.3 to 121.6 mg/kg
    4) Kidney: 3.2 to 44.4 mg/kg
    5) Heart: 4.5 to 47.8 mg/kg
    6) Brain: 2.5 to 53.9 mg/kg

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) ANIMAL DATA
    1) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 300 mg/kg (RTECS, 2001)
    2) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 435 mg/kg (RTECS, 2001)

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Zipeprol is a centrally acting antitussive agent with bronchospasmolytic and mycolytic activity; it reportedly also has antihistaminic, antiserotonin, anticholinergic, antibradykinin, antiarrhythmic, and anesthetic effects (Crippa et al, 1990; Janiri et al, 1991; Rispat et al, 1976). Although some sources have stated that the drug possesses pronounced antitussive properties without the adverse effects of the opiate (Constantin & Pognat, 1978), the drug has been abused for its narcotic properties (Crippa et al, 1990; Janiri et al, 1991; Moroni et al, 1984; Perraro & Beorchia, 1984; Slobodkin et al, 1992; Tempesta et al, 1990).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) ABUSE - In doses 5 to 10 times the therapeutic dose, zipeprol displaces 3H-labeled naloxone. In humans, therapeutic doses of zipeprol partially relieve symptoms of heroin withdrawal; conversely, high doses of naloxone (6 mg) partially antagonize the effects of zipeprol overdose. It has been speculated that zipeprol may have activity at the nonanalgesic mu and kappa opioid receptors (Slobodkin et al, 1992; Tempesta et al, 1990).
    B) SEIZURES - It has been speculated that overdose of zipeprol, a piperazine derivative, may cause inibition of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system, with an imbalance between glutamate and GABA responsible for seizures. When the inhibitory action of GABA on synaptic transmission is suppressed, a drop in cerebral levels of pyridoxal phosphate induces hyperexcitability, leading to seizures (pp 5-13).

Molecular Weight

    A) Zipeprol - 384.57(RTECS , 2001)
    B) Zipeprol Hydrochloride - 457.4 (S Sweetman , 2001)

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Acteo MD, Bowman E, & Butelman E: Zipeprol: preclinical assessment of abuse potential. Drug Alcohol Depend 1996; 42:93-104.
    3) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    4) Am Acad Neurol: Practice parameter: The management of concussion in sports (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Neurology 1997; 48:581-585.
    5) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    6) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    7) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    8) Battison C, Andrews PJ, Graham C, et al: Randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a 20% mannitol solution and a 7.5% saline/6% dextran solution on increased intracranial pressure after brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33(1):196-202.
    9) Bellander BT, Hagmar LE, & Osterdahl BG: Nitrosation of piperazine in the stomach (letter). Lancet 1981; 2:372.
    10) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    11) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    12) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    13) Bullock R, Chesnut RM, & Clifton G: Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Eur J Emerg Med 1996; 2:109-127.
    14) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    15) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    16) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    17) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    18) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    19) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    20) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    21) Constantin M & Pognat JF: Zipeprol metabolism in man and in the animal. Arzneimittel-Forschung (Drug Research) 1978; 28(1):64-72.
    22) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    23) Crippa O, Polettini A, & Avato FM: Lethal poisoning by zipeprol in drug addicts. J Forensic Sci 1990; 35:992-999.
    24) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    25) Daunderer M: Physostigmine salicylate as an antidote. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1980; 18(12):523-535.
    26) Donovan JW & Britt A: Incidence and risk factors of rhabdomyolysis in anticholinergic toxicity (3), , European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists Scientific Meeting, Birmingham, UK, 1993.
    27) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    28) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    29) Eyer F, Jetzinger E, Pfab R, et al: Withdrawal from high-dose tranylcypromine. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(3):261-263.
    30) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    31) Feldman Z, Kanter MJ, & Robertson CS: Effect of head elevation on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral blood flow in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 1992; 76:207-211.
    32) Frascogna N: Physostigmine: is there a role for this antidote in pediatric poisonings?. Curr Opin Pediatr 2007; 19(2):201-205.
    33) Friedman WF & George BL : Treatment of congestive heart failure by altering loading conditions of the heart. J Pediatr 1985; 106(5):697-706.
    34) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    35) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    36) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    37) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    38) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    39) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    40) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    41) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    42) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    43) Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, DeLeon SY, et al: Hemodynamic effects of intravenous nitroglycerin in pediatric patients after heart surgery. Circulation 1985; 72(3 Pt 2):II101-II107.
    44) Janiri L, Mannelli P, & Persico AM: Zipeprol is a newly abused antitussive with an opioid spectrum and hallucinogenic effects. Drug Alcohol Dependence 1991; 27:121-125.
    45) Jouglard J: Zipeprol abuse. An opportunity for assessment of its neurotoxicity. Newsletter of the Marseille Poison Centre, pp 5-13, 1991.
    46) Kintz P, Flesch F, & Jaeger A: GC-MS procedure for the analysis of zipeprol. J Pharm & Biomed Analysis 1993; 11(4-5):335-338.
    47) Kintz P, Tracqui A, & Potard D: An unusual death by zipeprol overdose. Forensic Science International 1994; 64:159-163.
    48) Kirkpatrick PJ: On guidelines for the management of the severe head injury (editorial). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1997; 62:109-111.
    49) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    50) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    51) Laitinen P, Happonen JM, Sairanen H, et al: Amrinone versus dopamine-nitroglycerin after reconstructive surgery for complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11(7):870-874.
    52) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    53) Mackersie RC & Karagianes TG: Use of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension for monitoring induced hypocapnia in head-injured patients. Crit Care Med 1990; 18:764-765.
    54) Mallaret MP, Lauby VL, & Cornier PH: Zipeprol: primary dependence in an unaddicted patient (letter). Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29:540.
    55) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    56) Meixensberger J, Baunach S, & Amschler J: Influence of body position on tissue-pO2, cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure in patients with acute brain injury. Neurol Res 1997; 19:249-253.
    57) Miller RD, Sohn YJ, & Matteo RS: Enhancement of d-tubocurarine neuromuscular blockade by diuretics in man. Anesthesiology 1976; 45:442-445.
    58) Moroni C, Cerchiari EL, & Gasparini M: Overdosage of zipeprol, a non-opioid antitussive agent (letter). Lancet 1984; 2:45.
    59) Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, Ward JD, et al: Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in patients with severe head injury: a randomized clinical trial.. J Neurosurg 1991; 75:731-739.
    60) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    61) Nam YT, Shin T, & Yoshitake J: Induced hypotension for surgical repair of congenital dislocation of the hip in children. J Anesth 1989; 3(1):58-64.
    62) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    63) Newton RW: Physostigmine salicylate in the treatment of tricyclic antidepressant overdosage. JAMA 1975; 231:941-943.
    64) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    65) None Listed: The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Hyperventilation. J Neurotrauma 2000a; 17(6-7):513-520.
    66) None Listed: The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Use of mannitol. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17(6-7):521-525.
    67) Pentel P & Peterson CD: Asystole complicating physostigmine treatment of tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1980; 9:588-590.
    68) Perraro F & Beorchia A: Convulsions and cerebral edema associated with zipeprol abuse (letter). Lancet 1984; 2:45-46.
    69) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    70) Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, & Bogaev CA: Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 1997; 41:84-92.
    71) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    72) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    73) Product Information: MANNITOL intravenous injection, mannitol intravenous injection. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2009.
    74) Product Information: Mannitol intravenous injection, mannitol intravenous injection. American Regent, Inc. (per DailyMed), Shirley, NY, 2009.
    75) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, Sodium Nitroprusside injection for IV infusion. Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL, 2007.
    76) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection, sodium nitroprusside injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    77) Product Information: benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp, Eatontown, NJ, 2009.
    78) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    79) Product Information: diphenhydramine hcl injection, diphenhydramine hcl injection. Bioniche Pharma USA,LLC, Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    80) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    81) Product Information: mannitol IV injection, urologic irrigation, mannitol IV injection, urologic irrigation. Abraxis Pharmaceutical Products, Schaumburg, IL, 2006.
    82) Product Information: physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, physostigmine salicylate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    83) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    84) Rasch DK & Lancaster L: Successful use of nitroglycerin to treat postoperative pulmonary hypertension. Crit Care Med 1987; 15(6):616-617.
    85) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    86) Rhoney D & Peacock WF: Intravenous therapy for hypertensive emergencies, part 1. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66(15):1343-1352.
    87) Rispat G, Burgi H, & Cosnier D: General pharmacological properties of a new non-opiate antitussive: zipeprol (3024 CERM). I. Action on respiratory function and acute toxicity. Arzneimittel Forschung (Drug Research) 1976; 26:523-530.
    88) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference (electronic version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    89) Sahuquillo J & Arikan F: Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006(1):CD003983-.
    90) Sakai K, Iwahashi K, & Terada K: Outcome after external decompression for massive cerebral infarction. Neurol Med Chir 1998; 38:131-136.
    91) Schlesser JL: Drugs Available Abroad, Gale Research Inc, Detroit, MI, 1991.
    92) Schneider GH, von Helden GH, & Franke R: Influence of body position on jugular venous oxygen saturation, intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Acta Neurochir 1993; 59(suppl):107-112.
    93) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    94) Shannon M: Toxicology reviews: physostigmine. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14(3):224-226.
    95) Slobodkin D, Thompson D, & Levin G: Habituation to zipeprol hydrochloride during pregnancy. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1992; 9:129-131.
    96) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    97) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    98) Stewart GO: Convulsions after physostigmine (letter). Anaesth Intens Care 1979; 7:283.
    99) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    100) Tannenbaum SR: N-nitroso compounds: a perspective on human exposure. Lancet 1983; 1:629-632.
    101) Taylor A, Butt W, & Rosenfeld J: A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17:154-162.
    102) Tempesta E, Janiri L, & Mannelli P: Clinical reports on recent abuse of an antitussive (letter). Br J Addiction 1990; 85:815-816.
    103) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    104) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    105) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    106) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    107) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    108) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    109) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    110) Yoo Y, Chung H, & Kim E: Postmortem distribution of zipeprol. J Analytical Tox 1994; 18(4):213-216.
    111) Zimmerman JL & Shen MC: Rhabdomyolysis. Chest 2013; 144(3):1058-1065.
    112) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.