MOBILE VIEW  | 

VERAPAMIL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, is a lipophilic, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances.

Specific Substances

    1) CP-16533-1 (verapamil)
    2) D-365 (verapamil)
    3) Iproveratril hydrochloride
    4) Verapamili chloridum
    5) Verapamil hydrochloride (synonym)
    6) CAS 52-53-9 (verapamil)
    7) CAS 152-11-4 (verapamil hydrochloride)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) VERAPAMIL HYDROCHLORIDE: C27H38N2O4.HCl (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info Verelan PM(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2010).

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE PRODUCTS
    a) Verapamil 40 mg (pink), 80 mg (peach), and 120 mg (brown) tablets (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) SUSTAINED-RELEASE PRODUCTS
    a) Verapamil 120 mg (light violet), 180 mg (light pink) and 240 mg (light green) caplets (Calan SR) (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    3) EXTENDED RELEASE PELLET FILLED CAPSULES
    a) Verapamil 100 mg, 200 mg and 300 mg hard gelatin capsules (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    B) USES
    1) Verapamil is a calcium ion influx inhibitor (slow-channel blocker or calcium ion antagonist), that is used to treat hypertension, angina (ie, angina at rest or chronic stable angina) and arrhythmias (ie, used with digitalis for the control of ventricular rate or prophylactic use for repetitive paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia) (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013; Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Verapamil is indicated for the treatment of essential hypertension, angina and in arrhythmias to control ventricular rate.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, is a lipophilic, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances. Binds to and antagonizes L-type calcium channels located on all types of muscle cells resulting in relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and arterial vasodilation as well as decreased force of cardiac contraction and decreased heart rate and conduction.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses cause depression of the SA node (bradycardia) and suppression of conduction through the AV node (heart blocks) as well as decreased contractility. Vasodilatory effects of verapamil overdose are intermediate between those caused by dihydropyridines (eg nifedipine) and benzothiapines (eg diltiazem).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Common overdose, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Minor gastrointestinal effects, headache, infection, flu-like syndrome and rash have been reported.
    2) OTHER EFFECTS: Dizziness, hypotension, bradycardia, congestive heart failure/pulmonary edema, fatigue and flushing have developed. Cardiac conduction defects (ie, AV blocks, complete heart block) have also occurred with therapy.
    3) RARE: Myoclonus and gynecomastia are unusual effects that have been reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Patients may have asymptomatic bradycardia or mild hypotension which may manifest as dizziness, fatigue, and/or lightheadedness and cardiac conduction defects (first-degree AV block).
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can cause profound bradycardia and dysrhythmias (including complete heart block and asystole), pulmonary edema and hypotension resulting in cardiogenic shock and end-organ dysfunction including lethargy, syncope, altered mental status, seizures, cerebral ischemia, bowel ischemia, hyperkalemia, renal failure, metabolic acidosis, coma, and death. Hyperglycemia generally develops in patients with severe poisoning. Rhabdomyolysis may occur in conjunction with acute renal failure follow prolonged hypotension.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Verapamil has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women. Verapamil does cross the placenta and can be excreted in breast milk. In animal studies, there was no evidence of teratogenicity; however, adverse maternal effects developed and resulted in embryocidal and retarded fetal growth and development.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant overdose monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. If significant hypotension develops monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum verapamil concentrations are not readily available and thus not immediately helpful.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion (calcium chloride is preferred) may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Because a verapamil overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated who have ingested sustained-release formulations; it can limit absorption from possible concretions. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Intubate patients with coma, mental status depression or significant hemodynamic instability.
    E) HYPOTENSION
    1) Treat initially with fluids (insert a central venous or pulmonary artery catheter to guide fluid therapy if hypotension persists). Consider inserting an arterial line in patients with refractory hypotension. Intravenous calcium, vasopressors, high dose insulin/dextrose, intravenous lipid emulsion, and glucagon may all be useful for refractory hypotension. Pacemakers (external or internal), intraaortic balloon pump, and cardiopulmonary bypass have been used in patients refractory to other modalities.
    2) CALCIUM
    a) Intravenous calcium infusions have been shown to be helpful, although response is often short lived. Optimal dosing is not established; start with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion starting with 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) and titrate as needed. Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration. Patients with severe overdose have tolerated significant hypercalcemia (up to twice the upper limit of normal) without developing clinical or ECG evidence of hypercalcemia.
    3) INSULIN
    a) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to titrate insulin infusion. Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued. Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium less than 2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    4) VASOPRESSORS
    a) Anecdotal reports suggest that epinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, or phenylephrine may occasionally be effective in patients who do not respond to dopamine or norepinephrine.
    5) FAT EMULSION
    a) Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Administer 1.5 mL/kg of 20% lipid emulsion over 2 to 3 minutes as an IV bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min. Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion. If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources. Where possible, lipid resuscitation therapy should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    6) GLUCAGON
    a) DOSE: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon.
    7) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    8) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) There are case reports where a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (inamrinone, enoximone) appeared to improve blood pressure in patients unresponsive to other modalities.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is likely not of value following a verapamil exposure, because of the high degree of protein binding (90%).
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: According to the AAPCC guidelines, a healthy, asymptomatic adult with a single inadvertent ingestion of verapamil 120 mg or less of immediate-release or a chewed sustained release tablet, or 480 mg or less of a sustained release formulation can be monitored at home. For children, ingestions of less than 2.5 mg/kg can be monitored at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a health care facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring. According to the AAPCC guidelines, a patient with an inadvertent single ingestion of verapamil greater than 120 mg immediate release or a chewed sustained-release, or greater than 480 mg sustained release formulation should be referred to a healthcare facility. For children, ingestion of greater than 2.5 mg/kg should be referred to a healthcare facility. Patients should be observed for at least 8 hours after ingestion of immediate release and 18 to 24 hours after ingestion of a sustained release formulation.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients who develop signs or symptoms of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Focus on antidote treatment should not be done in lieu of initially following standard ACLS protocols for treatment of bradycardia and hypotension. In severely poisoned patients, treatment should be aggressive, and the treatments and antidotes described above may need to be started simultaneously. Consider coingestants with other cardiopulmonary medications such as digoxin since these patients may be on multiple medications. Toxicity can be delayed and prolonged after overdose of modified release formulations.
    I) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) SUMMARY: Approximately 90% bound to plasma proteins. Norverapamil is the major metabolite of verapamil. Approximately 70% of a dose is excreted as metabolites in the urine and approximately 16% or more is excreted in the feces.
    2) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Peak plasma concentration is reached between 1 and 2 hours after oral administration. More than 90% of an oral dose is absorbed. Due to rapid biotransformation of verapamil during its first pass through portal circulation, bioavailability ranges from 20% to 35%. Mean elimination half-life in a single-dose study ranged from 2.8 to 7.4 hours. Following repetitive dosing, the half-life increased to a range from 4.5 to 12 hours.
    3) SUSTAINED RELEASE: In a crossover study, healthy volunteers given 240 mg of verapamil sustained release caplets, time to peak plasma verapamil concentration was 7.71 hours with food and 5.21 hours during a fasting state, respectively. Food did decrease bioavailability.
    4) EXTENDED RELEASE: Following administration these pellet filled capsules provide a 4 to 5 hour delay in drug delivery. Drug delivery is independent of pH, posture and food. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) occurs approximately 11 hours after dosing.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Chewing or crushing modified release formulations may result in rapid absorption of the entire dose and subsequent toxicity. Hypotension and bradycardia generally develop within 6 hours after overdose of regular release products. Toxicity can be delayed, in both immediate release and especially with overdoses of sustained release preparations. In one adult, peak plasma concentrations occurred 6 to 7 hours after overdose of 2.4 g of an immediate release verapamil product. Toxicity may occur as late as 15 to 22 hours after ingestion of sustained release formulations. In addition, duration of effect can be quite prolonged following overdose. Half-life can be prolonged in overdose and appears dose-dependent (eg, an overdose ingestion of 2.4 g of an immediate release formulation resulted in a half-life of 15 hours (parent compound) in an adult).
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Ingestion of other cardioactive drugs (especially beta-blockers and digoxin) should be considered in a patient who is bradycardic and hypotensive.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose is variable depending on the particular formulation of verapamil. The following doses are considered to be potentially toxic: ADULT DOSE: Greater than 120 mg immediate release or chewed sustained release or greater than 480 mg sustained release formulation. PEDIATRIC DOSE: Greater than 2.5 mg/kg. Single ingestions of therapeutic adult doses in children have resulted in death. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and the elderly tend to be more susceptible to the cardiac effects. In general, ingestions of phenylalkylamines (eg, verapamil) are more serious than ingestions of other calcium antagonists (ie, dihydropyridines (nifedipine)).
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Titrate to desired effect based on indication (range, 240 mg to 480 mg daily), dose should not exceed 480 mg/day. SUSTAINED RELEASE: Initial therapy: 180 mg daily. EXTENDED RELEASE: Typical dose is 200 mg daily at bedtime; maximum 400 mg daily. PEDIATRIC: Varies by indication. The pediatric maximum single therapeutic dose of verapamil is 2.5 mg/kg

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild metabolic acidosis (pH 7.2 to 7.3) is common in patients with hypotension (Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007; McMillan, 1988; da Silva et al, 1979; de Faire & Lundman, 1977) .
    b) CASE REPORT: Severe metabolic acidosis with pH 7.06 and lactic acid levels to 11.5 mEq/L were associated with electromechanical dissociation and death 30 hours after a 12 gram overdose of sustained release verapamil (Hofer et al, 1993).
    c) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 59-year-old man intentionally ingested 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil tablets and alcohol. Upon admission (2.5 hours after ingestion), his heart rate was 30 beats/min (complete heart block) with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. Despite pharmacologic support and transvenous pacing, hypotension persisted and about 5 hours after ingestion the patient had a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated but an hour later ventricular fibrillation occurred. Other complications included oliguria and metabolic acidosis (arterial blood gases: pH 6.9, PaO(2) 11 kPa, PaCO(2) 8.1 kPa, base excess -20). Inotropic support (ie, dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline) was needed for 3 days to maintain an adequate systolic pressure. The patient was extubated on day 5. He was discharged to home on day 11 completely recovered with no cardiac or neurologic deficits (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).
    d) SUSTAINED RELEASE/CASE REPORT: Lactic acidosis was reported in a 14-year-old boy who ingested 30 verapamil 180 mg sustained-release tablets. His arterial pH was 7.08 with a lactate level of 19.1 mEq/L. His lactic acidosis persisted for over 24 hours despite sodium bicarbonate therapy; however, with continued supportive therapy, the patient recovered and was subsequently transferred for psychiatric treatment (George, 2010).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Minor skin rashes are reported for most calcium channel agents (Sun et al, 1994).
    B) FLUSHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Flushing has been reported infrequently following verapamil therapy (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rarely, rhabdomyolysis may develop and may cause acute renal failure following overdose ingestions of calcium antagonists, including verapamil (Gokel et al, 2000; Quezado et al, 1991).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity.
    b) A retrospective analysis, involving the measurement of hyperglycemia in adult patients following overdose ingestions of diltiazem or verapamil, showed an increase in the median peak serum glucose concentrations in those patients who met the composite endpoints measuring the severity of the overdose (ie, in-hospital mortality, necessity of a temporary pacemaker, or vasopressor therapy), as compared with those patients who did not meet the composite endpoints (364 mg/dl vs 145 mg/dl). The median increase in blood glucose was also greater in the patients who met the composite endpoints as compared to those patients who did not (71.2% vs 0%). Based on these results, there appears to be a direct correlation between serum glucose concentrations and the severity of calcium antagonist overdose, and may be useful as a predictor of the severity of the intoxication (Levine et al, 2007).
    c) CASE REPORT: At presentation 2.5 hours after ingestion of 6.8 grams of immediate-release verapamil, serum glucose was 346 mg/dL (upper normal 109 mg/dL). As hemodynamics improved, the value returned to 126 mg/dL at 24 hours (McMillan, 1988).
    d) CASE REPORT: 22-year-old obese nondiabetic woman ingested 2400 mg of immediate-release verapamil. Blood pressure was 60 mmHg with heart rate of 30 beats/minute at admission. Dextrose in normal saline, used initially to maintain blood pressure, resulted in serum glucose of 832 mg/dL. Insulin infusions were used to return values to normal (Enyeart et al, 1983).
    e) CASE SERIES: In a series of 15 cases of calcium channel blocker overdose, 4 nondiabetic patients developed hyperglycemia (Howarth et al, 1994).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Verapamil is indicated for the treatment of essential hypertension, angina and in arrhythmias to control ventricular rate.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, is a lipophilic, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances. Binds to and antagonizes L-type calcium channels located on all types of muscle cells resulting in relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and arterial vasodilation as well as decreased force of cardiac contraction and decreased heart rate and conduction.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses cause depression of the SA node (bradycardia) and suppression of conduction through the AV node (heart blocks) as well as decreased contractility. Vasodilatory effects of verapamil overdose are intermediate between those caused by dihydropyridines (eg nifedipine) and benzothiapines (eg diltiazem).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Common overdose, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Minor gastrointestinal effects, headache, infection, flu-like syndrome and rash have been reported.
    2) OTHER EFFECTS: Dizziness, hypotension, bradycardia, congestive heart failure/pulmonary edema, fatigue and flushing have developed. Cardiac conduction defects (ie, AV blocks, complete heart block) have also occurred with therapy.
    3) RARE: Myoclonus and gynecomastia are unusual effects that have been reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Patients may have asymptomatic bradycardia or mild hypotension which may manifest as dizziness, fatigue, and/or lightheadedness and cardiac conduction defects (first-degree AV block).
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can cause profound bradycardia and dysrhythmias (including complete heart block and asystole), pulmonary edema and hypotension resulting in cardiogenic shock and end-organ dysfunction including lethargy, syncope, altered mental status, seizures, cerebral ischemia, bowel ischemia, hyperkalemia, renal failure, metabolic acidosis, coma, and death. Hyperglycemia generally develops in patients with severe poisoning. Rhabdomyolysis may occur in conjunction with acute renal failure follow prolonged hypotension.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ISCHEMIC OPTIC NEUROPATHY
    a) Two patients experienced vision loss approximately 3 days following overdose ingestions of verapamil and metoprolol (Senthilkumaran et al, 2011).
    1) CASE REPORT: The first patient, a 55-year-old woman, ingested 30 verapamil 40 mg tablets and 35 metoprolol 50 mg tablets. Three days postingestion, the patient was not able to see. Examination of the patient revealed a visual acuity of light perception in both eyes, dilated pupils that were nonreactive to light, and normal optic discs without disc swelling or evidence of pallor. A diagnosis of posterior ischemic optic neuropathy was made, believed to be secondary to hypoperfusion resulting from a combined beta-blocker and calcium antagonist overdose ingestion. With supportive therapy, including high-dose steroid administration, the patient's vision gradually improved, although a 6-month follow-up examination revealed that she continued to experience bilateral loss of the nasal half of the visual field.
    2) CASE REPORT: The second patient, a 25-year-old woman, ingested 25 verapamil 40 mg tablets and 20 metoprolol 50 mg tablets. Three to four days postingestion, the patient experienced vision loss. An ophthalmic examination revealed fixed and dilated pupils in both eyes with no light perception. Ocular motility, intraocular pressures, anterior segments, and fundoscopy were normal. The patient was diagnosed as having ischemic optic neuropathy. Two days later, with supportive care, the patient's vision gradually improved, although she continued to experience bilateral loss of the nasal half of the visual field at the 6 month follow-up visit.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Clinical experience with 4954 patients, primarily with immediate release verapamil, 2.5% developed hypotension and 1.7% of patients developed significant hypotension following administration of extended release verapamil (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 78-year-old woman with a history of biventricular heart failure developed cardiogenic shock and apnea within 4 hours after ingesting a single 80 mg dose of verapamil. The patient gradually recovered following artificial ventilation and vasopressor administration (Stajer et al, 2001).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old woman, who was on verapamil therapy for treatment of recurrent supraventricular dysrhythmias, developed cardiogenic shock within hours after adding atenolol, 25 mg daily, to the verapamil regimen. She became hypotensive, developed pulmonary congestion, loss of consciousness, and was subsequently mechanically ventilated. Arterial blood gases showed severe hypoxemia with metabolic acidosis. The patient recovered without neurological sequelae following IV administration of calcium chloride (Sakurai et al, 2000).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SIGNS/SYMPTOMS: Hypotension is common following significant overdose with verapamil. Hypotension may be quite severe and unresponsive to pressor agents. Syncopal episodes secondary to impaired perfusion may occur (SamiKarti et al, 2002; Vadlamudi & Wijdicks, 2002; Herbert et al, 2001; Meyer et al, 2001; Ori et al, 2000; Luscher et al, 1994; Welch et al, 1992).
    b) ONSET: Common within 1 to 5 hours postingestion, although delayed onset (more than 24 hours) and prolonged duration of symptoms can occur following sustained-release dosage forms (Tuka et al, 2009; Luscher et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1993; Quezado et al, 1991; Spiller et al, 1991; Krick et al, 1990; de Faire & Lundman, 1978) .
    c) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 60-year-old man with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus inadvertently ingested 5 tablets of Tarka(R) (trandolapril/verapamil extended release 4-240 mg daily) and presented about 8 hours after ingestion complaining of dizziness and a fall at home. Hypotension and bradycardia were present. Despite treatment with fluids, calcium chloride, activated charcoal and a modified dose of hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy and glucagon, hypotension persisted. The patient clinically improved once glucagon was stopped and dopamine was added. Significant vomiting developed and it was uncertain if it was related to glucagon therapy or verapamil toxicity. Seventeen hours after exposure, his heart rate and blood pressure were stable (Cohen et al, 2009).
    d) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 3.5 year-old girl presented with somnolence 7 hours after unintentionally ingesting 6 Tarka(R) tablets containing verapamil 240 mg (total dose, 1440 mg) and trandolapril 4 mg total dose, 24 mg) in each tablet. Initially, vital signs were stable and the child was normotensive (BP 80/60 mm Hg). Approximately 5 hours later, arterial pressure (BP 50/20 mm Hg) and heart rate (58 beats/min) declined and an ECG showed complete AV block. Treatment included fluid resuscitation, dopamine, adrenalin and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. A temporary pacemaker was added due to persistent bradycardia and hypotension. Within 8 hours of inserting the temporary pacemaker, dopamine and adrenalin infusions were gradually weaned and discontinued. Normal cardiac function was noted at 13 hours and the pacemaker was stopped. On day 3, the child was discharged completely recovered (Dogan et al, 2011).
    e) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 51-year-old man who was taking extended-release verapamil therapy, 1 240-mg tablet 3 times daily for treatment of cluster headaches, was given an unintentional substitution of immediate-release verapamil, 2 120-mg tablets 3 times daily. Approximately 30 minutes after ingesting the first dose of the immediate-release verapamil, the patient experienced severe hypotension (75/50 mmHg upon admission to the emergency department) and bradycardia, indicative of verapamil intoxication. The patient recovered following supportive care (Laberge et al, 2001).
    B) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AV BLOCK
    1) The effect of verapamil on AV conduction and the SA node can lead to asymptomatic first-degree AV block and occasionally transient bradycardia; however, high degrees of AV block were reported infrequently in patients receiving verapamil (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Electrophysiologic effects of calcium antagonists vary among these agents including verapamil (Mitchell et al, 1982). In overdose, all agents can cause rhythm disturbances and conduction defects. Bradycardia for example is twice as likely with verapamil and diltiazem. AV block, especially greater than first degree, is predominate finding with verapamil.
    b) AV BLOCK
    1) SUMMARY
    a) FINDINGS: ECG manifestations following verapamil intoxication include heart block, first-, second-, and third-degree AV block, junctional rhythm, QT interval prolongation, moderate S-T segment depression, low amplitude T-waves, prominent U-waves, and atrial fibrillation (Henrikson & Chandra-Strobos, 2003; SamiKarti et al, 2002; Schwab et al, 2002; Ori et al, 2000; De Cicco et al, 1999; Luscher et al, 1994; Quezado et al, 1991; McMillan, 1988; Moroni et al, 1980) .
    b) INCIDENCE: In one series, 28 (55%) verapamil cases experienced first or greater degree AV block compared with 10 (29%) diltiazem and 5 (18%) nifedipine patients (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    c) ONSET: AV block usually occurs 4 to 24 hours postexposure (Spiller et al, 1991; da Silva et al, 1979).
    d) DURATION: Cardiac disturbances commonly persist for 9 to 48 hours, but have been reported to last as long as 7 days (Quezado et al, 1991). In one series, 80% of cases were asymptomatic for all cardiovascular effects after 24 hours (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) CASE REPORT: Sinus arrest with asystole following IV verapamil has been reported in a digitalized patient (Kounis, 1980), and one day following a multiple agent ingestion including an unknown amount of sustained-release verapamil (MacDonald & Alguire, 1992).
    b) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 59-year-old man intentionally ingested 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil tablets and alcohol. Upon admission (2.5 hours after ingestion), his heart rate was 30 beats/min (complete heart block) with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. Immediate care included atropine, gastric lavage, activated charcoal, fluids and calcium gluconate. Transvenous pacing was added with minimal change in blood pressure. Hypotension persisted and about 5 hours after ingestion the patient had a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated and intubated and started on noradrenaline. An hour later, ventricular fibrillation occurred and he was successfully defibrillated. Persistent hypotension and oliguria along with metabolic acidosis was noted at this time. Hemofiltration was begun for renal insufficiency. Inotropic support (ie, dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline) was needed for 3 days to maintain an adequate systolic pressure. The patient was extubated on day 5. He was discharged to home on day 11 completely recovered with no neurologic or cardiac deficits (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).
    c) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 3.5 year-old girl presented with somnolence 7 hours after unintentionally ingesting 6 Tarka(R) tablets containing verapamil 240 mg (total dose, 1440 mg) and trandolapril 4 mg (total dose, 24 mg) in each tablet. Initially, vital signs were stable and the child was normotensive (BP 80/60 mm Hg). Approximately 5 hours later, arterial pressure (BP 50/20 mm Hg) and heart rate (58 beats/min) declined and an ECG showed complete AV block. Treatment included fluid resuscitation, dopamine, adrenalin and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. A temporary pacemaker was added due to persistent bradycardia and hypotension. Within 8 hours of inserting the temporary pacemaker, dopamine and adrenalin infusions were gradually weaned and discontinued. Normal cardiac function was noted at 13 hours and the pacemaker was stopped. On day 3, the child was discharged completely recovered (Dogan et al, 2011).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old girl presented to the emergency department several hours after ingesting 7.2 g of verapamil and 240 mg of paroxetine in a suicide attempt and, within minutes after presentation, developed cardiac arrest that lasted 65 minutes. The patient recovered following aggressive resuscitation with no apparent neurologic sequelae (Evans & Oram, 1999).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl ingested an unknown quantity of verapamil and presented to the hospital 1 to 2 hours later. Upon admission, the patient was unresponsive, with dilated pupils, cyanosis, and respiratory depression. Cardiac monitoring showed complete heart block and a narrow complex escape rhythm. The patient responded to resuscitation; however, asystole occurred 3 hours later. Despite aggressive resuscitative measures, the patient died 19 hours after admission (Orr et al, 1982).
    C) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) FINDINGS: Heart rates below 60 beats/min with accompanying hypotension at presentation are common (SamiKarti et al, 2002; Vadlamudi & Wijdicks, 2002; Meyer et al, 2001), but isolated bradycardia has also been noted (Krick et al, 1990).
    2) ONSET: Common within 1 to 5 hours postingestion, although delayed onset (more than 6 hours) can occur following sustained-release dosage forms (Barrow et al, 1994; Rodgers et al, 1989)
    3) DURATION: Bradycardia persisting for 36 to 52 hours after admission has been reported (Barrow et al, 1994; Howarth et al, 1994; Perkins, 1978). In one series, 80% of cases were asymptomatic for all cardiovascular effects after 24 hours (Ramoska et al, 1993). Ingestion of sustained-release verapamil products may result in prolonged or delayed effects (Barrow et al, 1994; Luscher et al, 1994).
    4) CASE REPORT
    a) EXTENDED RELEASE/CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old man who was taking extended-release verapamil therapy, 1 240-mg tablet 3 times daily for treatment of cluster headaches, was given an unintentional substitution of immediate-release verapamil, 2 120-mg tablets 3 times daily. Approximately 30 minutes after ingesting the first dose of the immediate-release verapamil, the patient experienced severe hypotension and bradycardia (60 beats/minute upon admission to the emergency department), indicative of verapamil intoxication. The patient recovered following supportive care (Laberge et al, 2001).
    b) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 3.5 year-old girl presented with somnolence 7 hours after unintentionally ingesting 6 Tarka(R) tablets containing verapamil 240 mg (total dose, 1440 mg) and trandolapril 4 mg total dose, 24 mg) in each tablet. Initially, vital signs were stable and the child was normotensive (BP 80/60 mm Hg). Approximately 5 hours later (12 hours after ingestion), arterial pressure (BP 50/20 mm Hg) and heart rate (58 beats/min) declined and an ECG showed complete AV block. Treatment included fluid resuscitation, dopamine, adrenalin and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. A temporary pacemaker was added due to persistent bradycardia and hypotension. Within 8 hours of inserting the temporary pacemaker, dopamine and adrenalin infusions were gradually weaned and discontinued. Normal cardiac function was noted at 13 hours and the pacemaker was stopped. On day 3, the child was discharged completely recovered (Dogan et al, 2011).
    D) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 59-year-old man intentionally ingested 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil tablets and alcohol. Upon admission (2.5 hours after ingestion), his heart rate was 30 beats/min (complete heart block) with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. Immediate care included atropine, gastric lavage, activated charcoal, fluids and calcium gluconate. Transvenous pacing was added with minimal change in blood pressure. Hypotension persisted and about 5 hours after ingestion the patient had a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated and intubated and started on noradrenaline. An hour later, ventricular fibrillation occurred and he was successfully defibrillated. Persistent hypotension and oliguria along with metabolic acidosis was noted at this time. Hemofiltration was begun for renal insufficiency. Inotropic support (ie, dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline) was needed for 3 days to maintain an adequate systolic pressure. The patient was extubated on day 5. He was discharged to home on day 11 completely recovered with no neurologic or cardiac deficits (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).
    E) HEART FAILURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Clinical experience with 4954 patients, primarily with immediate release verapamil, 87 (1.8%) developed congestive heart failure or pulmonary edema. Verapamil should be avoided in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011)
    F) MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) An adult took an unknown amount of several calcium channel blockers (eg, diltiazem, nifedipine, verapamil), and developed symptoms similar to an acute myocardial infarction (ie, diaphoresis, weakness and shortness of breath). ECG changes (new left bundle branch block) and a moderate rise in CK level (2820 International Units/L) and a slightly elevated troponin level (0.10 ng/ml; normal less than 0.09) were also reported. Coronary angiography did not suggest MI. He improved with aggressive supportive care, and later the patient admitted to taking an unspecified amount in likely escalating doses of the various CCBs to treat his lifelong history of intermittent SVT (Henrikson & Chandra-Strobos, 2003).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema has been observed infrequently following extended verapamil therapy (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema has been reported following verapamil overdose (Izdes et al, 2014; Siddiqi et al, 2013; Ori et al, 2000; Howarth et al, 1994; Leesar et al, 1994; Spurlock et al, 1991).
    b) RISK FACTORS: Fluid loading to maintain blood pressure and treat shock and oliguria secondary to hypotension may contribute (Barrow et al, 1994).
    c) MECHANISM: Not fully understood. It may be due to precapillary vasodilatation that results in excessive pulmonary capillary transudation. In addition, fluid therapy that is often used for refractory shock and hypotension may worsen symptoms (Siddiqi et al, 2013).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old man with a history of obesity, polysubstance abuse and major depression intentionally ingested 3.6 g of sustained release verapamil, fluoxetine 400 mg and sustained release carbamazepine 1800 mg and an unknown amount of alcohol and recovered following multiple therapies. He was found unconscious by his family about 3 hours postingestion. At presentation he was intoxicated and his initial vital signs were stable. Approximately 12 hours after ingestion he became hypotensive (blood pressure 65/32 mm Hg) and lethargic. Fluid therapy (5 liters of normal saline) and norepinephrine and epinephrine were started with little clinical improvement. Further therapies included an intralipid bolus (200 mL of a 20% solution), glucagon 5 mg and 10% calcium chloride IV (total dose 4 g) followed by an infusion of 0.2 mL/kg/hr. Intubation and mechanical ventilation were also required with known aspiration of abdominal contents at the time of intubation. Additional vasopressors were added (ie, phenylephrine, vasopressin) with all vasopressors at maximum doses. At this time, hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia (HIE therapy) was begun. Activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation were also started about 12 hours post ingestion. His hospital course was further complicated by oliguric kidney injury and metabolic acidosis. Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema was demonstrated by increasing oxygen requirements and radiographic studies. Diuresis was begun. By the morning of day 2, the patient was clinically improving and all vasopressors and glucagon were discontinued and by day 3 his calcium and insulin infusions were stopped. He was hemodynamically stable but developed alcohol and opiate withdrawal during his hospital stay. A comprehensive drug screen was positive for verapamil, ethanol, carbamazepine, oxycodone and another opiate (Siddiqi et al, 2013).
    e) CASE REPORT: Respiratory distress syndrome occurred in a 27-year-old man within 24 hours after ingesting approximately 24 g of sustained-release verapamil. The patient gradually improved following mechanical ventilation along with experimental partial liquid ventilation therapy using a fluorocarbon which theoretically improves ventilation, eases pulmonary toilet, and reduces potential lung injury secondary to lower ventilator settings (Szekely et al, 1999).
    f) CASE REPORTS: Two 19-year-old women developed noncardiogenic pulmonary edema following overdose ingestions of sustained-release verapamil in doses ranging from 6000 to 7200 mg. Both patients developed dyspnea and chest x-rays revealed diffuse patchy infiltrations bilaterally. Following supportive care, both patients gradually recovered (SamiKarti et al, 2002).
    B) RESPIRATORY ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/INFANT: Survival was reported in an 11-month-old female who ingested 400 mg of verapamil. Lethargy, respiratory arrest, bradycardia, hypotension, and tonic-clonic seizures were observed (Passal & Crespin, 1984).
    C) HYPERVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Kussmaul respiration was described 2 hours after ingestion of 2.4 g of verapamil (da Silva et al, 1979).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FINDINGS: Drowsiness, mental confusion, lethargy, and dizziness, lightheadedness are common (Cohen et al, 2009; Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007; Moroni et al, 1980; Candell et al, 1979; da Silva et al, 1979); circulatory collapse and/or coingestion complicate evaluation of mental status.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old man became comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale of 6 decreasing to 3) approximately 18 hours following an overdose ingestion of 6 to 7.2 g of sustained-release verapamil. On day 5, the patient gradually recovered with a spontaneous reaction to pain and response to verbal stimuli (Tuka et al, 2009).
    B) ISCHEMIC STROKE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Cerebral infarction may develop during supportive care following acute ingestion.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman who ingested 2280 mg of verapamil along with 120 mg propranolol and 40 mg opipramol developed left hemiparesis and a right temporoparietal cerebral infarction. Three months later, the patient exhibited mild right hemiparesis (Samniah & Schlaeffer, 1988).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman developed right arm, leg, and facial weakness, expressive dysphagia, cognitive, and language deficits on the second day following 7.2 g overdose of sustained-release verapamil. CAT scan ruled out hemorrhage (Shah & Passalacqua, 1992).
    C) LETHARGY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/INFANT: Survival was reported in an 11-month-old female who ingested 400 mg of verapamil. Lethargy, respiratory arrest, bradycardia, hypotension, and tonic-clonic seizures were observed (Passal & Crespin, 1984).
    D) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) RISK FACTORS: Seizure activity may result from cerebral ischemia, anoxia, or an existing predisposition.
    b) CASE REPORT/INFANT: Survival was reported in an 11-month-old female who ingested 400 mg of verapamil. Lethargy, respiratory arrest, bradycardia, hypotension, and tonic-clonic seizures were observed (Passal & Crespin, 1984).
    E) MYOCLONUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old woman presented to the ICU with profound hypotension, bradycardia, and multifocal myoclonus after ingesting approximately 7.2 g of sustained-release verapamil tablets. The myoclonus was present in the facial muscles, as well as, the extremities, and appeared to become exaggerated with action. Following supportive care, the patient completely recovered approximately 60 hours postingestion (Vadlamudi & Wijdicks, 2002).
    F) HEADACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Headache may develop with verapamil therapy (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013). It was the most frequent adverse event observed with extended verapamil therapy formulations (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea is reported infrequently with verapamil therapy (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea and vomiting can develop (Belson et al, 2000; Candell et al, 1979; de Faire & Lundman, 1977) .
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation can develop, but is usually mild and easy to manage with the therapeutic use of extended release verapamil (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    C) BEZOAR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Following overdose of sustained release verapamil, concretions have occasionally been reported within the stomach or intestines. They are often not visible on plain x-ray films of the abdomen; gastrointestinal emptying methods to remove the concretions have not been proven. Endoscopy may be necessary following severe toxicity or prolonged symptoms (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    b) Tablet concretions ranging in size from golf to tennis ball size developing from sustained-release dosage forms have been found at autopsy. Gastroscopy may be required for confirmation if suspected since these masses have not been apparent on abdominal films (Sporer & Manning, 1993).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old man presented 24 to 36 hours after ingesting sustained-release verapamil and died 20 hours later. Despite protracted vomiting, a golf ball sized lump of tablets was found at autopsy (Rankin & Edwards, 1990).
    D) VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY OF INTESTINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Bowel necrosis and mesenteric ischemia may occur in the absence of prolonged hypotension (Donovan et al, 1999).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) At autopsy following overdose of sustained-release verapamil, a 10 cm length of infarcted cecum was found. Concurrent cocaine abuse, hypotension, vasopressor use, and polyethylene glycol bowel irrigation may have been contributory (Sporer & Manning, 1993).
    E) DRUG-INDUCED ILEUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Verapamil can slow gastrointestinal transit time following overdose (Prod Info COVERA-HS(R) oral extended-release controlled-onset tablets, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old man ingested 4.8 g of sustained-release verapamil. Complications developing during his prolonged 7 day hospital stay included an ileus, ARDS and acute renal failure (Quezado et al, 1991).
    F) GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) A case control study suggested that therapeutic use of calcium channel blockers may be associated with a 2-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding as compared with users of beta-blockers (Kaplan et al, 2000).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Mild elevations in transaminase levels developed in 1 patient after prolonged hypotension following averapamil overdose ingestion of an unknown amount (Herbert et al, 2001).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Acute renal failure has been reported, usually in patients who develop prolonged hypotension and/or rhabdomyolysis after severe poisoning.
    b) CASE REPORT: Rhabdomyolysis, followed by acute renal failure, developed in a 23-year-old man after ingestion of 4.8 g of sustained-release verapamil (Quezado et al, 1991).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old woman developed acute oliguric renal failure several hours after ingesting approximately 7200 mg of sustained-release verapamil. The patient's serum creatinine and urea peaked at 4.8 mg/dL and 118 mg/dL, respectively. The renal failure resolved 3 days later, with a normalization of serum creatinine and urea levels (Ori et al, 2000).
    d) CASE REPORT: Acute renal failure with rhabdomyolysis was reported in a 28-year-old man following ingestion of 4 capsules, each containing 180 mg of verapamil and 2 mg trandolapril. Approximately 36 hours postingestion, the patient's serum creatinine and BUN peaked at 574 mcmol/L and 13.5 mmol/L, respectively. Approximately 1 week postingestion, the patient recovered with a normalization of serum creatinine and BUN levels (Gokel et al, 2000).
    B) OLIGURIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Transient oliguria is associated with prolonged hypotension (Barrow et al, 1994).
    b) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 59-year-old man intentionally ingested 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil tablets and alcohol. Upon admission (2.5 hours after ingestion), his heart rate was 30 beats/min (complete heart block) with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. Immediate care included atropine, gastric lavage, activated charcoal, fluids and calcium gluconate. Transvenous pacing was added with minimal change in blood pressure. Hypotension persisted and about 5 hours after ingestion the patient had a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated and intubated and started on noradrenaline. An hour later, ventricular fibrillation occurred and he was successfully defibrillated. Persistent hypotension and oliguria along with metabolic acidosis was noted at this time. Hemofiltration was begun for renal insufficiency. Inotropic support (ie, dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline) was needed for 3 days to maintain an adequate systolic pressure. The patient was extubated on day 5. He was discharged to home on day 11 completely recovered with no neurologic or cardiac deficits (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man took 6.8 g immediate-release verapamil. At presentation, blood pressure (60 mmHg) and heart rate (50 beats/min) were depressed. Urine output improved over 6 hours with restoration of hemodynamic stability (McMillan, 1988).
    C) GYNECOMASTIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Gynecomastia has been reported in postmarketing experience with verapamil (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Verapamil has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women. Verapamil does cross the placenta and can be excreted in breast milk. In animal studies, there was no evidence of teratogenicity; however, adverse maternal effects developed and resulted in embryocidal and retarded fetal growth and development.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) No evidence of teratogenicity has been observed in rabbits or rats receiving oral doses up to 9.5 (15 mg/kg/day) and 7.5 (60 mg/kg/day) times the human oral daily dose, respectively. However, rats given this multiple of the human dose was embryocidal and produced retarded fetal growth and development. These events were likely due to adverse maternal effects reflected in reduced weight gains of the dams. Hypotension can develop in rats (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There are no adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    B) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified verapamil as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013; Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    C) FETAL AND MATERNAL ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) CASE REPORT: As tocolytic therapy, verapamil plus ritodrine prolonged pregnancy by an average of 9 additional days compared with ritodrine alone (Rodrigues-Escudero et al, 1981).
    2) CASE REPORT: Verapamil is detectable in umbilical venous blood and has been shown to slow fetal tachycardia when given in combination with B-acetyldigoxin to the mother (Wolff et al, 1980).
    D) PLACENTAL TRANSFER
    1) Verapamil does cross the placenta an can be detected in umbilical vein blood at the time of delivery (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Verapamil is excreted into human milk. In cases where verapamil concentrations levels were calculated, the nursing infant dose ranged from less than 0.01% to 0.1% of the mother's dose (Prod Info Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant overdose monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. If significant hypotension develops monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum verapamil concentrations are not readily available and thus not immediately helpful.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Blood concentrations of calcium antagonists are not readily available. Blood concentrations generally do not predict toxicity or direct management, but may be of forensic or pharmacokinetic interest.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium) and renal function.
    3) Monitor serum glucose. Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity (Levine et al, 2007).
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor respiratory function with pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor cardiovascular status to include blood pressure, ECG, and urinary output.
    b) Monitor respiratory function as clinically indicated, pulmonary edema may occur.
    c) Monitor mental status; CNS depression due to direct drug effects, cardiovascular disruptions, and coingestion of CNS depressants is common. Seizures are rare but may occur.
    d) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning (Kamijo et al, 2006).

Radiographic Studies

    A) RADIOGRAPHIC-OTHER
    1) Current dosage forms, including sustained-release, are generally not radiopaque.
    2) CASE REPORT: A "tennis ball" sized concretion of sustained-release verapamil found at autopsy was not apparent on abdominal radiographs taken during supportive therapy (Sporer & Manning, 1993).
    3) CASE REPORT: Verapamil SR(R) was reported as radiopaque in vivo (Linowiecki et al, 1992).

Methods

    A) HPLC/MS
    1) High-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) was performed to determine repeated plasma levels of verapamil and its metabolite, norverapamil, in a 51-year-old man from the time of hospital admission to the time of death, approximately 40 hours later. The patient had intentionally ingested 30 240-mg verapamil SR tablets (total amount ingested 7200 mg) and subsequently died from multi-organ failure. The limits of detection for verapamil and norverapamil, using the HPLC/MS method, were 1 and 3 ng/mL, respectively. The limits of quantitation for both compounds was set at 10 ng/mL (Tracqui et al, 2003).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who show the following signs of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991):
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Hypotension or bradycardia; conduction system abnormalities; AV block; asystole; congestive heart failure
    2) RESPIRATORY: Pulmonary edema
    3) GASTROINTESTINAL: Nausea or vomiting
    4) GENITOURINARY: Renal insufficiency
    5) NEUROLOGICAL: Seizures; altered mental status
    B) All patients with a history of calcium antagonist ingestion should have a baseline electrocardiogram and be monitored for a minimum of 8 hours. Patients who have ingested modified release formulations should be monitored for up to 24 hours (Spiller et al, 1991).
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) According to the AAPCC guidelines, a healthy, asymptomatic adult with a single inadvertent ingestion of verapamil 120 mg or less of immediate-release or a chewed sustained release tablet, or 480 mg or less of a sustained release formulation can be monitored at home. For children, ingestions of less than 2.5 mg/kg can be monitored at home (Olson et al, 2005).
    B) A retrospective study was conducted of 161 patients who inadvertently ingested double their usual dose of calcium channel blocker or more. Of the 104 patients who ingested double their usual dose, 9 (9%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. Four of these symptomatic patients had ingested less than or equal to the maximum single dose for the drug, and another four had ingested a dose in between the maximum single dose and the maximum daily dose. Of the 57 patients who had ingested more than double their usual daily dose, 8 (14%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. All of these patients had ingested an amount equal to or greater than the maximal daily dose. The toxicity of calcium antagonists following a therapeutic overdose can be highly variable; this could be due to the broad range of therapeutic doses and the pre-existing conditions in these patients. Because of this variability, home management may be difficult; poison centers should be conservative in their evaluation of these cases (Cantrell et al, 2005).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a healthcare facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring.
    B) According to the AAPCC guidelines, patients with an inadvertent single ingestion of verapamil doses greater than 120 mg of immediate release or chewed sustained release or greater than 480 mg sustained release formulation should be referred to a healthcare facility. For children, ingestions of greater than 2.5 mg/kg should be referred to a healthcare facility (Olson et al, 2005).
    C) All patients with a history of calcium antagonist ingestion should have a baseline electrocardiogram and be monitored for a minimum of 8 hours. Patients who have ingested modified release formulations should be monitored for up to 24 hours (Spiller et al, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    D) CHILDREN LESS THAN 6 YEARS OF AGE: Based on 5 retrospective case reviews involving calcium channel blocker ingestions in children less than 6-years-old, patients should be observed in-hospital for 6 hours following ingestion of regular-release medications and for 12 to 24 hours following ingestion of sustained-release formulations (Ranniger & Roche, 2007). However, toxicity can be delayed following an overdose. Based on the Tmax of verapamil, all patients should be observed for at least 8 hours following an ingestion of immediate-release verapamil.
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Peak plasma concentrations occurred 6 to 7 hours after an intentional ingestion of 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil in a 59-year-old man who developed prolonged toxicity (ie, persistent hypotension over 3 or more days, cardiac arrest, metabolic acidosis and acute renal failure), despite aggressive care. He recovered completely (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant overdose monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. If significant hypotension develops monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum verapamil concentrations are not readily available and thus not immediately helpful.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Because verapamil overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated who have ingested sustained-release formulations; it can limit absorption from possible concretions. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    2) If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Single doses of activated charcoal are recommended. While not proven effective, administration of a second dose should be considered especially in the setting of sustained-release dosage form ingestion or coingestion of drugs or chemicals which could delay gastric emptying or slow intestinal motility (Krenzelok, 1991) .
    2) In a volunteer study, administration of activated charcoal 2 or 4 hours after ingestion of slow-release verapamil decreased absorption by 35% and 32% respectively (Laine et al, 1997a). Delayed administration of activated charcoal was not effective in reducing absorption of a conventional formulation of verapamil (Laine et al, 1997).
    3) In a randomized cross-over study, administration of activated charcoal 30 minutes after ingestion 80 mg verapamil reduced the peak plasma concentration of verapamil by 16% (Lapatto-Reiniluoto et al, 2000).
    4) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    5) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Gastric lavage, followed by administration of activated charcoal, is recommended in patients with significant ingestions. A large bore orogastric tube is preferred due to the large size of some sustained-release dosage forms.
    2) Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products.
    3) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    4) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    5) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    6) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    7) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) Consider whole bowel irrigation following activated charcoal to limit absorption from possible concretions and sustained release products. It should only be performed in patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated. Whole bowel irrigation should not be performed in patients that are hemodynamically unstable. Sustained-release formulations have produced concretions composed of alginate hydrocolloid matrix despite initial lavage (Rankin & Edwards, 1990; Sporer & Manning, 1993; Buckley et al, 1993; Hendren et al, 1989).
    2) Repeat charcoal following whole bowel irrigation since the PEG/electrolyte solution may desorb drug from charcoal. If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    E) ENDOSCOPY
    1) Following overdose of sustained release verapamil, concretions have occasionally been reported within the stomach or intestines. They are often not visible on plain x-ray films of the abdomen; gastrointestinal emptying methods to remove the concretions have not been proven. Endoscopy may be necessary following severe toxicity or prolonged symptoms (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    2) Tablet concretions ranging in size from golf to tennis ball size developing from sustained-release dosage forms have been found at autopsy. Gastroscopy and endoscopic removal may be required for confirmation if suspected since these masses have not been apparent on abdominal films (Sporer & Manning, 1993).
    3) As with other calcium channel blockers (eg, nifedipine), the formation of bezoars appear to be associated with acute overdose ingestion of extended-release tablets in a small number of cases. Treatment of the bezoar may be dependent on several factors, including the location, composition, and size of the bezoar, and patient symptoms. In the setting of acute overdose, endoscopic removal may be necessary. For symptomatic bezoars, surgery may be necessary if the bezoar cannot be removed endoscopically (Wells et al, 2006; Niezabitowski et al, 2000; Taylor et al, 1998).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion (calcium chloride is preferred) may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Serum verapamil concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    2) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    3) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    4) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    5) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    6) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    7) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning (Kamijo et al, 2006).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) FLUIDS
    a) INDICATION: Loss of systemic vascular resistance requires an increase in circulating volume. Complete response to fluids alone should not be expected, but volume replacement is a necessary component. Administer IV 0.9% NaCl at 10 to 20 mL/kg and place the patient in supine position. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    b) CAUTIONS: Monitor for signs of pulmonary edema (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    2) CALCIUM
    a) INDICATIONS: Calcium is used to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is non-competitive (DeRoos, 2011; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993), but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    b) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985); however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops(Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994). Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration.
    d) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    e) HYPERCALCEMIA: Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves within 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects (clinical or ECG) from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    1) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia with concentrations as high as 19.2 mg/dL (9.9 mg/dL upper limit of normal) secondary to treatment with calcium salts have been reported during aggressive therapy (Buckley et al, 1993) without adverse effects secondary to hypercalcemia. Such aggressive treatment with calcium salts may be necessary to reverse conduction defects (Howarth et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia (16.3 mg/dL) occurred following aggressive calcium chloride treatment in a 45-year-old woman following an overdose ingestion of sustained-release diltiazem. There were no ECG manifestations due to the hypercalcemia and the patient recovered uneventfully over the next 4 days (Hantsch et al, 1997).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    g) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Calcium chloride can cause tissue injury following extravasation; administer calcium chloride via central venous catheter. Hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia may also occur following repeat dosing or continuous infusion; monitor serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Nausea, vomiting, flushing, constipation, confusion, and angina have also been reported in patients receiving calcium (DeRoos, 2011).
    3) INSULIN/DEXTROSE
    a) DOSE
    1) Intravenous insulin infusion with supplemental dextrose, and potassium as needed, is recommended in patients with severe or persistent hypotension after a calcium channel blocker overdose (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004).
    2) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 units/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to determine the need for higher rates of insulin infusion (Lheureux et al, 2006). In some refractory cases, more aggressive high-dose insulin protocols have been suggested, starting with a 1 unit/kg insulin bolus, followed by a 1 unit/kg/hour continuous infusion. If there is no clinical improvement in the patient, the infusion rate may be increased by 2 units/kg/hour every 10 minutes, up to a maximum of 10 units/kg/hour (Engebretsen et al, 2011).
    3) Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued.
    4) Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium less than 2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    5) Monitor blood pressure, pulse, ECG, mental status, serum glucose and potassium, urine output, and if possible cardiac function by way of echocardiogram/ultrasound, right heart catheter.
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) SUMMARY: Insulin/dextrose infusions were administered to 5 patients who experienced severe circulatory shock following intentional calcium channel blocker overdose ingestions and who were unresponsive to conventional treatment. Blood pressures normalized within hours after receiving the infusions and all 5 patients recovered without sequelae. In 3 of the 4 patients, insulin and dextrose were administered as bolus doses, 10 units and 25 grams, respectively, with the subsequent administration of insulin infusion, the dose ranging from 0.1 units/kg/hr to 1.0 units/kg/hr, and dextrose (50% w/v) infusion, the dose ranging from 5 grams/hour to 15 grams/hr, via a central venous catheter. Each patient also received other supportive measures and inotropic agents (Yuan et al, 1999).
    2) Insulin infusions, with or without dextrose given concurrently, were administered to several hemodynamically unstable patients following calcium antagonist intoxication who were refractory to conventional therapy. Blood pressures in all patients normalized within hours after receiving the insulin (Agarwal et al, 2012; Azendour et al, 2010; Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007; Greene et al, 2007; Boyer et al, 2002).
    3) One study reviewed 13 case reports where high-dose insulin (10 to 20 units in 6 patients; 1 patient received 1000 units inadvertently; infusion rates 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr; duration either a single bolus dose or infusions for 5 to 96 hours) with supplemental dextrose and potassium (HDIDK) were used to treat calcium channel blockers overdose. These patients failed to respond clinically to other therapies. Twelve patients survived. HDIDK therapy was beneficial in seriously intoxicated patients with CCB-induced hypotension, hyperglycemia, and metabolic acidosis. However, this therapy did not consistently reverse bradycardia, heart block and intraventricular conduction delay (Shepherd & Klein-Schwartz, 2005).
    4) VASOPRESSOR AGENTS
    a) INDICATION: Direct acting alpha-agonists mediate vasoconstriction by mechanisms independent of calcium influx and are preferred (Jaeger et al, 1989), although normal vascular response cannot be expected. In case review series, dopamine is the most commonly cited agent, followed by epinephrine, isoproterenol, and norepinephrine (Watling et al, 1992; Erickson et al, 1991).
    b) RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: A retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a single tertiary care center for the treatment of verapamil or diltiazem overdose, confirmed by drug or urine drug screening, from 1987 through 2012 was conducted to evaluate the role of vasopressor therapy in the management and outcome of nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker overdoses. A total of 48 patients (median age 45 years, range 15 to 76 years) were included and 24 (50%) were verapamil ingestions; coingestions were also likely to occur (n=38 (79%)). A second group consisted of 12 patients that met inclusion criteria except for the absence of drug or urine testing. Vasopressors were given to 33 of 48 (69%) patients and most patients received multiple vasopressors (eg, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, isoproterenol, phenylephrine or norepinephrine). Of these patients, the median number of vasopressors needed to treat hypotension was 2 (range, 1 to 5); norepinephrine (n=25 (52%) and dopamine (n=19 (40%)) were the 2 most common vasopressors used. High doses of vasopressors were needed in many patients:
    1) Norepinephrine (n=25): 15 (8.4 to 24.5 mcg/min) mcg min; maximum infusion rate: 100 mcg/min
    2) Dopamine (n=19): 19 (12 to 20 mcg/kg/min; maximum infusion rate: 100 mcg/kg/min
    3) Epinephrine (n=13): 20 (10 to 26 mcg/min; maximum infusion rate: 150 mcg/min
    4) Isoproterenol (n=13): 11 (5 to 25) mcg/min; maximum infusion rate: 60 mcg/min
    5) Dobutamine (n=7): 10 (7 to 15) mcg/kg/min; maximum infusion rate 245 mcg/kg/min
    6) Phenylephrine (n=3): 100 (100 to 175 mcg/min; maximum infusion rate: 250 mcg/min
    1) Intravenous calcium (chloride or gluconate) was also administered to 38 (79%) patients with a median total dose of elemental calcium of 2 g. In addition, 26 patients received glucagon. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy was administered to 3 patients that also received multiple vasopressors. Of the 31 patients that developed bradycardia including various degrees of AV block, all rhythms responded to vasopressors or glucagon except one patient. Ischemic complications were noted in 5 (10%) patients, with most complications present prior to the initiation of vasopressor therapy. One death was reported and did not appear to be a direct result of a calcium channel blocker overdose. Seven patients did not develop significant bradycardia or hypotension and required no treatment (Levine et al, 2013).
    c) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed severe hypotension following calcium antagonist poisoning. Despite administration of fluids and vasopressor agents, hypotension persisted. SvO2 was continuously monitored in both patients, using a fiberoptic pulmonary catheter, in order to detect tissue hypoxia. The SvO2 remained between 71% and 85%, indicating adequate tissue oxygenation, and metabolic acidosis did not occur. Gradually, the hypotension of both patients resolved without more aggressive administration of vasopressor therapy, suggesting that higher infusion rates of vasopressor agents may not be necessary in patients with refractory hypotension, provided that tissue hypoxia can be excluded after volume resuscitation. Continuous SvO2 monitoring, using a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter, may be a useful index of tissue oxygenation (Kamijo et al, 2006).
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) Case reports have described the use of higher than conventional doses of dopamine (up to 40 to 50 mcg/kg/min) in patients with refractory hypotension after calcium antagonist overdose (Evans & Oram, 1999). Consider high rates of infusion in patients with refractory hypotension.
    7) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    2) DOSE
    a) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    b) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    8) EPINEPHRINE
    a) EPINEPHRINE
    1) ADULT
    a) BOLUS DOSE: 1 mg intravenously/intraosseously every 3 to 5 minutes to treat cardiac arrest (Link et al, 2015).
    b) INFUSION: Prepare by adding 1 mg (1 mL of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution) to 250 mL D5W, yielding a concentration of 4 mcg/mL, and infuse this solution IV at a rate of 1 mcg/min to 10 mcg/min (maximum rate) (Lieberman et al, 2010). Used primarily for severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure 70 mm Hg), or anaphylaxis associated with hemodynamic or respiratory compromise, may also be used for symptomatic bradycardia if atropine and transcutaneous pacing are unsuccessful or not immediately available (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: INTRAVENOUS/INTRAOSSEOUS: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.01 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution); maximum 1 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 3 to 5 minutes (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sorrentino, 2005). ENDOTRACHEAL: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.1 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution). Maximum 2.5 mg/dose (maximum total dose: 10 mg). May repeat every 3 to 5 minutes (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008). Follow ET administration with saline flush or dilute in isotonic saline (1 to 5 mL) based on the child's size (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    b) INFUSION: Used for the treatment of refractory hypotension, bradycardia, severe anaphylaxis. DOSE: 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min, titrate dose; start at lowest dose needed to reach desired clinical effects. Doses as high as 5 mcg/kg/min may sometimes be necessary. High dose epinephrine infusion may be useful in the setting of beta blocker poisoning (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    3) CAUTION
    a) Extravasation may cause severe local tissue ischemia (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008); infusion through a central venous catheter is advised.
    b) Epinephrine has been found to be useful in other cases of calcium channel blocker (ie, diltiazem, verapamil) overdose. However, multiple vasopressors are likely to be needed to maintain clinical improvement following a significant overdose (Levine et al, 2013)
    c) Large doses may be required (Levine et al, 2013).
    d) One-time bolus doses of 1 mg have been used in addition to bolus-infusion regimens (Erickson et al, 1991). Epinephrine 1 mg bolus followed by 0.2 to 0.6 mcg/kg/min improved both SBP and urine flow for 18 hours (Henderson et al, 1992). Infusion rates up to 100 mcg/min have been reported (Anthony et al, 1986).
    9) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    10) CAUTIONS: Normal vascular response may not be seen. Doses of isoproterenol, while beneficial to cardiac conduction (beta-1 effect), may worsen peripheral vascular resistance (beta-2 effects) (Krenzelok, 1991).
    11) PHENYLEPHRINE
    a) PHENYLEPHRINE
    1) MILD OR MODERATE HYPOTENSION
    a) INTRAVENOUS: ADULT: Usual dose: 0.2 mg; range: 0.1 mg to 0.5 mg. Maximum initial dose is 0.5 mg. A 0.5 mg IV dose can elevate the blood pressure for approximately 15 min (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011). PEDIATRIC: Usual bolus dose: 5 to 20 mcg/kg IV repeated every 10 to 15 min as needed (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    2) CONTINUOUS INFUSION
    a) PREPARATION: Add 10 mg (1 mL of a 1% solution) to 500 mL of normal saline or dextrose 5% in water to produce a final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.
    b) ADULT DOSE: To raise blood pressure rapidly; start an initial infusion of 100 to 180 mcg/min until blood pressure stabilizes; then reduce infusion to 40 to 60 mcg/min titrated to desired effect. If necessary, additional doses in increments of 10 mg or more may be added to the infusion solution and the rate of flow titrated to the desired effect (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Intravenous infusion should begin at 0.1 to 0.5 mcg/kg/min; titrate to the desired effect (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    3) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Headache, reflex bradycardia, excitability, restlessness and rarely dysrhythmias may develop (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    12) DOBUTAMINE
    a) DOBUTAMINE
    1) DOSE: ADULT: Infuse at 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV. PEDIATRIC: Infuse at 2 to 20 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV or intraosseous, titrated to desired effect (Peberdy et al, 2010; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate if ventricular ectopy develops (Prod Info dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, 2012).
    13) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    d) In a canine model of severe verapamil overdose glucagon (2.5 mg bolus followed by an infusion of 2.5 mg over 1 hour) increased cardiac output and heart rate and restored sinus rhythm without affecting mean arterial pressure or total peripheral resistance (Stone et al, 1995).
    14) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) INAMRINONE
    1) INAMRINONE
    a) PREPARATION: Dilute solution for infusion to a final concentration of 1 to 3 milligrams per milliliter in normal saline (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ADULT DOSE: Loading dose of 0.75 milligram/kilogram over 2 to 3 minutes followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram per minute titrate to hemodynamic response. Repeat initial loading dose after 30 minutes if necessary (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: The safety and effectiveness of inamrinone in the pediatric population has not been established (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    d) CAUTIONS: May cause hypotension and dysrhythmias (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ENOXIMONE
    1) CASE REPORT: After ingesting 2800 mg of atenolol and 1600 mg of verapamil, a 57-year-old man with a history of ischemic heart disease (2 previous acute myocardial infarctions) developed hypotension (BP 80/50 mmHg), and bradycardia (40 beats/min). An ECG revealed a sinus bradycardia with a first-degree heart block, previously absent. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, only a modest hemodynamic effect was observed. Following treatment with a bolus of enoximone 1 mg/kg and a continuous infusion at 0.5 mcg/kg/min for 5 days, his hemodynamic status improved. The authors suggested that enoximone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, may be an alternative agent to glucagon as they have an inotropic effect which is not mediated by a beta receptor (Sandroni et al, 2004).
    15) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    b) MECHANISM: Carnitine is synthesized in several human organs, including liver and kidneys. It is produced from amino acids lysine and methionine in 2 optical isomeric forms with only L-carnitine being the biological active isomer. It transports fatty acids from the cellular cytoplasm into the mitochondrial matrix by the carnitine shuttle. The fatty acids undergo beta-oxidation to form acetyl-CoA in the mitochondrial matrix. It then enters the Krebs cycle to produce cellular energy. In one animal study, it was proposed that verapamil toxicity changed the cardiac metabolism from free fatty acids to carbohydrate. It has been suggested that L-carnitine in combination with high-dose insulin can decrease insulin resistance, promote intracellular glucose transport, increase the uptake and hepatic beta-oxidation of fatty acids, and increase calcium channel sensitivity in patients with calcium channel blocker toxicity (Perez et al, 2011; St-Onge et al, 2013).
    c) ANIMAL STUDY: In a controlled, blinded animal study, 16 male rats were anesthetized and received a constant infusion of 5 mg/kg/hr of verapamil to produce severe verapamil toxicity. All animals received a bolus of 50 mg/kg of either L-carnitine or normal saline 5 minutes later. Mean arterial pressures (MAP) and heart rates of animals were recorded at baseline and at 15 and 30 minutes after the start of the experiment. The survival time was evaluated using the length of time (in minutes) from the initiation of verapamil until either the MAP had reached 10% of the baseline values or 150 minutes had passed without a suitable reduction in blood pressure. Animals in the L-carnitine group survived a median time of 140.75 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 98.6 to 150 minutes) as compared with 49.19 minutes (IQR = 39.2 to 70.97 minutes; p=0.0001) in the normal saline group. All animals in the L-carnitine group and one in the saline group survived over 90 minutes. Four animals in the L-carnitine group also survived the 150-minute protocol. At 15 minutes, a higher mean MAP was observed in the carnitine group (63 mm Hg; SD +/- 19.4 mmHg) as compared with the saline group (42.6 mmHg; SD +/_ 22.9 mmHg; p=0.047; a difference of 20.4 mmHg; 95% CI = 0.25 to 40.65 mmHg) (Perez et al, 2011).
    d) AMLODIPINE/METFORMIN OVERDOSE: A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type II diabetes, benign prostate hypertrophy, and chronic anemia, ingested 300 mg of amlodipine, 3500 mg of metformin, and ethanol in a suicide attempt. He presented pale, diaphoretic, and hemodynamically unstable (BP 56/42 mmHg, heart rate 77 beats/min). Laboratory results revealed a blood glucose concentration of 13 mmol/L, serum creatinine of 103 mcmol/L (normal, 50 to 100 mcmol/L), serum sodium of 126 mmol/L, and an increased CK of 871 mmol/L. The arterial blood gas analysis an hour later showed a pH of 7, pCO2 of 42, bicarbonate of 10 mmol/L, and lactate of 14.1 mmol/L (anion-gap of 22). Despite supportive therapy for 10 hours, including calcium, glucagon, vasopressors, high-dose insulin (HDI; even after more than 1 hour of infusion at 320 Units/hr), dextrose, lipid emulsion, and bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis, he remained in refractory shock (BP 110/50 mmHg, norepinephrine running at 80 mcg/min), hyperglycemic (33 mmol/L), oliguric, and acidotic. Continuous renal replacement therapy was not initiated because he was considered too unstable. About 11 hours after presentation, he received L-carnitine 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours. His condition began to improve about 30 minutes after L-carnitine loading dose and his norepinephrine requirement continued to decrease. Vasopressors were discontinued within 36 hours of initial presentation and he was extubated successfully within 4 days of presentation. His serum amlodipine concentration was 83 ng/mL (therapeutic: 3 to 11 ng/mL) on arrival and peaked at 160 ng/mL several hours later. His metformin concentration was 24 mcg/mL (therapeutic: 1 to 2 mcg/mL) at arrival (St-Onge et al, 2013).
    16) VASOPRESSIN
    a) VERAPAMIL/LACK OF IMPROVEMENT: A 41-year-old woman intentionally ingested 80 tablets of sustained release verapamil (total dose 19.2 g) and developed severe toxicity about 14 hours after exposure. She became hypotensive and bradycardic with third degree AV block. Initial treatment included calcium, fluids, dopamine and isoproterenol; norepinephrine, epinephrine and vasopressin were added with only temporary improvement of hypotension. Other treatments included intubation and transvenous pacing and hyperglycemia-euglycemia insulin therapy and glucagon. Acute renal failure developed and CVVH was started. On hospital day 4, lipid therapy was begun. Within 3 hours the norepinephrine dose was reduced and within 48 hours vasopressin was stopped. By day 6, transvenous pacing was no longer needed. Despite cardiac improvement, she developed further complications necessitating an urgent colectomy (Liang et al, 2011).
    b) AMLODIPINE AND DILTIAZEM: Two patients were given vasopressin infusions for the treatment of refractory hypotension following intentional ingestions of 800 mg amlodipine and 4800 mg sustained-release diltiazem, respectively. The vasopressin infusion, in the first patient, was initiated at a rate of 2.4 International Units (IU)/hour and titrated to 4.8 IU/hour over two hours. The second patient received a 20 IU bolus of vasopressin followed by a 4 IU/hour infusion. The hypotension resolved in both patients and they were subsequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (Kanagarajan et al, 2007).
    c) ANIMAL STUDY: In a porcine model, 18 anesthetized swine, each receiving a verapamil infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr until the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased to 70% of baseline, were divided into two groups: one group that received a vasopressin infusion of 0.01 units/kg/min (n=8) and the control group that received an equal volume of normal saline (n=10). MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output were then measured every 5 minutes until t=60 minutes. The results showed that there was no significant difference in MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output between the two groups. Four of 8 animals in the vasopressin group died as compared with 2 of 10 animals in the control group. Death appeared to be related to hypotension and low cardiac output. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that treatment with vasopressin actually decreased the survival of swine following verapamil intoxication as compared to the swine treated with normal saline alone (Barry et al, 2005).
    17) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) ANIMAL DATA: In a study involving swine to determine the efficacy of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate in treating hypotension associated with severe verapamil toxicity, it was determined that swine, treated with 4 mEq/kg of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate given intravenously over 4 minutes, experienced a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output as compared with animals in the control group, who were given 0.6% sodium chloride in 10% mannitol (Tanen et al, 2000).
    18) METARAMINOL
    a) AMLODIPINE: A 43-year-old man developed hypotension (BP 65/40 mmHg) after ingesting 560 mg of amlodipine. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, glucagon and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, there was no hemodynamic response. Following treatment with metaraminol (a loading bolus of 2 mg [equivalent to 25 mcg/kg] and intravenous infusion of 1 mcg/kg/min [83 mcg/min] for 36 hours), there was improvement in his blood pressure, cardiac output and urine output (Wood et al, 2005).
    19) TERLIPRESSIN
    a) FELODIPINE: A 61-year-old man developed hypotension (75/50 mmHg on admission) after ingesting 140 mg of felodipine. Despite administration of epinephrine and norepinephrine, the patient's hypotension persisted (mean arterial pressure 47 mmHg). A continuous infusion of 0.05 mcg/kg/min of terlipressin, a vasopressor, was initiated, resulting in the mean arterial pressure increasing from 47 to 95 mmHg; systemic vascular resistance and SvO2 also increased (Leone et al, 2005).
    D) FAT EMULSION
    1) SUMMARY: In a survey of medical directors at US Poison Control Centers, intravenous fat emulsion (IFE) therapy is recommended by Poison Control Centers with similar protocols and the same dosing recommendations as the American College of Medical Toxicology. In the setting of verapamil overdose, most would "always" or "often" recommend IFE therapy for overdose that resulted in cardiac arrest (36 of 45 directors; 80%) and would "always" or "often" recommend IFE in patients that develop shock (28 of 45 directors; 62%) secondary to verapamil overdose (Christian et al, 2013).
    2) Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been effective in reversing severe cardiovascular toxicity from local anesthetic overdose in animal studies and human case reports. Several animal studies and human case reports have also evaluated the use of ILE for patients following exposure to other drugs. Although the results of these studies are mixed, there is increasing evidence that it can rapidly reverse cardiovascular toxicity and improve mental function for a wide variety of lipid soluble drugs. It may be reasonable to consider ILE in patients with severe symptoms who are failing standard resuscitative measures (Lavonas et al, 2015).
    3) The American College of Medical Toxicology has issued the following guidelines for lipid resuscitation therapy (LRT) in the management of overdose in cases involving a highly lipid soluble xenobiotic where the patient is hemodynamically unstable, unresponsive to standard resuscitation measures (ie, fluid replacement, inotropes and pressors). The decision to use LRT is based on the judgement of the treating physician. When possible, it is recommended these therapies be administered with the consultation of a medical toxicologist (American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016; American College of Medical Toxicology, 2011):
    a) Initial intravenous bolus of 1.5 mL/kg 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid) over 2 to 3 minutes. Asystolic patients or patients with pulseless electrical activity may have a repeat dose, if there is no response to the initial bolus.
    b) Follow with an intravenous infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min of 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid). Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion.
    c) If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources.
    d) Where possible, LRT should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    4) CASE REPORTS
    a) CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT
    1) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old woman intentionally ingested 80 tablets of sustained release verapamil (total dose 19.2 g). She was decontaminated with multiple doses of activated charcoal. Fourteen hours after exposure, the patient suddenly became lethargic with a decrease in oxygen saturation requiring a 100% non-rebreather. She became hypotensive and bradycardic; a third degree AV block was noted on ECG. Initial treatment included calcium, fluids, dopamine and isoproterenol; norepinephrine, epinephrine and vasopressin were added with only temporary improvement of hypotension. Other treatments included intubation and transvenous pacing and hyperglycemia-euglycemia insulin therapy and glucagon. Acute renal failure developed and CVVH was started. On hospital day 4, lipid therapy (100 mL bolus of 20% intralipid followed by 0.5 mL/kg/h; total dose: 4200 mL over 7 days) was begun. Within 3 hours the norepinephrine dose was reduced and within 48 hours vasopressin was stopped. By day 6, transvenous pacing was no longer needed. Despite cardiac improvement, her clinical course was further complicated by the development of a pneumatosis intestinalis necessitating an urgent colectomy. On day 55, the patient was discharged to a skilled nursing facility (Liang et al, 2011).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man intentionally ingested large quantities of multiple medications, one of which was 13.44 g of verapamil. He was found 12 hours later to be poorly responsive with incoherent speech and hypotensive (69/26 mmHg) with a pulse of 55 beats/min. Fluids, pressors, calcium and glucagon were all administered, but he remained hypotensive with junctional bradycardia, metabolic acidosis and renal insufficiency. Then, upon transfer, 100 mL of 20% lipids was infused followed by a 0.5 mL/kg/hr infusion for 24 hours. Blood pressure improved within an hour of initiation of intravenous lipid emulsion, and he made a full recovery (Young et al, 2009).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with dyspnea, chest tightness, lethargy, diaphoresis, and hypotension (76/41 mmHg) after intentionally ingesting 17 240-mg tablets of extended release verapamil (total dose ingested 4.08 g). Despite treatment with IV fluids and norepinephrine therapy, the patient's hypotension persisted. Approximately 17 hours after presentation, the patient was switched to dopamine, without effect, and, approximately 15 hours later, the patient was given 100 mL of 20% lipids, administered intravenously over 20 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mL/kg/hour for the next 8 hours. During this time period, the patient's blood pressure improved and dopamine therapy was gradually discontinued (Franxman et al, 2011).
    b) CLINICAL COMPLICATION
    1) CASE REPORT/INTRAOSSEOUS ADMINISTRATION: A 24-year-old woman intentionally ingested approximately 30 tablets of 240-mg extended-release verapamil along with a smaller but unknown quantity of 80 mg immediate-release verapamil. The patient presented to the ED about 1 to 2 hours after ingestion. Hypotension (dropped to as low as 65/30 mm Hg) was persistently present. A central line was placed. She was initially treated with glucagon, high dose insulin (100 Units) and calcium gluconate with no clinical improvement. Vasopressors and 20% intralipid fat emulsion therapy were then added. At the time, ILE therapy was ready, the patient lost peripheral venous access with difficulty finding another peripheral site and the central line was being used for other drug therapies. A decision was made to use an intraosseous site (left proximal tibia using an EZ-IO system). Intralipids were started through the IO access, but decreased flow was noted during the bolus infusion. At this time, peripheral access was achieved and the intralipid infusion was restarted. Despite treatment, the patient died 2 days later. The authors suggested that IO access for intralipids may be a unique approach to administering intralipids when intravenous access is difficult. Possible complications of administration may be due to the viscosity of intralipids, but it has be given successfully in animals. This potential complication may be avoided by slowing down the rate of the bolus infusion (Sampson & Bedy, 2015).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old woman was admitted to the ED about 8 hours after intentionally ingesting 9.6 g of verapamil. Upon admission, she was hypotensive with a heart rate of 38 beats/min. Initial treatment included: noradrenaline, oxygen supplementation (6 L/min to maintain a 100% oxygen), a transvenous pacemaker and IV calcium and saline (2500 mL). Her blood pressure began to stabilize following high doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine and transvenous pacing but the patient developed anuria and persistent renal failure. Six hours after admission, she required endotracheal intubation due to a decrease in oxygen saturation. Approximately 18 hours after admission, an intralipid infusion was started with a 100 mL bolus of 20% followed by a continuous infusion at 0.2 mL/kg/min to improve hemodynamic instability. About 4 hours after the start of intralipid therapy, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developed. Both extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVH) were initiated. Triglyceridemia was also observed (102 mmol/L (normal range, less than 7 mmol/l)) about 30 hours after admission. Plasmapheresis was initiated after consult with a nephrologist and triglyceridemia normalized 3 days later. By day 4 of therapy, ECMO was successfully discontinued and the patient was extubated on day 9. By day 18, the patient was moved from the intensive care unit. At the time of discharge she was neurologically stable with a normal pulmonary function (Martin et al, 2014).
    5) ANIMAL DATA
    a) In a dog model of severe verapamil poisoning, dogs treated with 7 mg/kg 20% intravenous fat emulsion (after atropine and three doses of calcium chloride) had improved mean arterial pressure and 120 minute survival (100% vs 14%) compared with dogs treated with the same doses of atropine and calcium chloride, and 7 mg/kg 0.9% saline (Bania et al, 2007).
    b) In a rat model of lethal verapamil overdose, intralipid treatment prolonged survival (44 +/-21 vs 24 +/- 9 minutes; p=0.003) and doubled median lethal dose (25.7 mg/kg [95% CI = 24.7 to 26.7] vs 13.6 mg/kg [95% CI = 12.2 to 15]). In addition, during verapamil infusion, a less marked decrease in heart rate was noted in the Intralipid-treated group (6.8 bpm [95% CI=8.3 to 5.2] for intralipid vs 10.7 bpm [95% CI = 12.6 to 8.9] for saline; p=0.001) (Tebbutt et al, 2006).
    E) BRADYCARDIA
    1) INDICATIONS: Calcium is used to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is non-competitive (DeRoos, 2011; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993), but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    2) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985); however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011).
    3) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994). Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration.
    4) HYPERCALCEMIA: Some degree of hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves with in 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    5) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    6) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    7) CASE REPORT/HIGH DOSE ADMINISTRATION: A 40-year-old woman, with chronic renal insufficiency, developed hypotension and bradycardia after ingesting 30 mg of amlodipine. The patient's blood pressure and heart rate normalized following high-dose intravenous administration of calcium chloride, consisting of 4 grams given in the ED followed by 1.5 grams every 20 minutes (for a total of 13 grams given over 2 hours) (Hung & Olson, 2007).
    8) ATROPINE
    a) INDICATION: Bradydysrhythmia contributing to hypotension. May be more effective after calcium administration (Howarth et al, 1994).
    b) ATROPINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    a) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) Up to 2 mg has been administered without effect (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    d) PRECAUTIONS: Atropine primarily blocks vagal effects at the SA node while calcium antagonists affect AV conduction; marked improvements in rate may not be seen.
    9) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate in calcium antagonist intoxication.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    10) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) INDICATION: Predominant beta-1 effects stimulate discharge rate at SA node, increase heart rate, and improve contractility (Krenzelok, 1991).
    b) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    11) PACEMAKER
    a) INDICATION: Consider using a pacemaker device in severely symptomatic patients (Liang et al, 2011; Rodgers et al, 1989; Quezado et al, 1991; MacDonald & Alguire, 1992).
    12) INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP
    a) CASE REPORT: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was required in addition to pacing in a 17-year-old girl who had taken an unknown quantity of acebutolol 400 mg capsules in addition to 480 mg sustained-release verapamil (Welch et al, 1992). Other successful applications have been reported (Melanson et al, 1993; Williamson & Dunham, 1996).
    13) CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
    a) CASE REPORT: Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in a 25-month-old child after verapamil overdose. Serum verapamil concentrations fell during the procedure, allowing successful pacing, but rose again after discontinuation of the procedure, and he subsequently died (Hendren et al, 1989).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man ingested 4800 to 6400 mg of verapamil in a suicide attempt and developed cardiac arrest. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass was required 2.5 hours after cardiac arrest. Complete recovery was reported 6 months after exposure (Holzer et al, 1999).
    F) EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION
    1) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has not been used to treat a patient with significant hemodynamic instability following a verapamil overdose but has been used successfully in a few reports of severe calcium channel blocker toxicity with other agents.
    2) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old girl experienced multiple asystolic cardiac arrests with atrial standstill, refractory to therapy with high-dose epinephrine and transcutaneous cardiac pacing, after intentionally ingesting 12 grams of sustained-release diltiazem tablets. The patient's hemodynamic status significantly improved, with a return of brainstem reflexes, following a 48-hour period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Durward et al, 2003).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old man presented to the ED with decreased level of consciousness, dyspnea, hypoxemia (O2 sat 91%), and hypotension (80/40 mmHg) approximately 2 hours after intentionally ingesting 10 g atenolol and an unknown amount of nifedipine, lacidipine, fluoxetine, and sertraline. An ECG indicated prolonged QT interval and QRS widening. The patient rapidly deteriorated hemodynamically, developed cardiac arrest (successfully resuscitated), and persistent metabolic acidosis and shock with multiple organ failure despite aggressive decontamination and supportive therapies. ECMO was initiated 2 hours post-admission along with high-volume continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (HV-CVVH). Over the next 48 hours, the patient became hemodynamically stable and was weaned from ECMO; however, the patient's clinical course was complicated by the development of progressive neurologic impairment, resulting in a persistent reduction in motor skills, impaired coordination, gait ataxia, and mild aphasia (Rona et al, 2011).
    G) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    H) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    8) PARTIAL LIQUID VENTILATION
    a) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man, who ingested approximately 24 grams of sustained-release verapamil and subsequently developed hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation, was enrolled in a phase II clinical trial and was given partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with Perflubron(R), a fluorocarbon, administered intratracheally every 2 hours for 4 days. The patient's pulmonary function significantly improved within hours of PLV administration (Szekely et al, 1999).
    1) Theoretically, the dense fluorocarbon improves ventilation: perfusion by redistribution of blood to the anterior portions of the lungs, eases pulmonary toilet (aids in the removal of exudate), and reduces potential further lung injury secondary to lower ventilator settings.
    I) BEZOAR
    1) Following overdose of sustained release verapamil, concretions have occasionally been reported within the stomach or intestines. They are often not visible on plain x-ray films of the abdomen; gastrointestinal emptying methods to remove the concretions have not been proven. Endoscopy may be necessary following severe toxicity or prolonged symptoms (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    2) Tablet concretions ranging in size from golf to tennis ball size developing from sustained-release dosage forms have been found at autopsy. Gastroscopy may be required for confirmation if suspected since these masses have not been apparent on abdominal films (Sporer & Manning, 1993).
    3) As with other calcium channel blockers (eg, nifedipine), the formation of bezoars appear to be associated with acute overdose ingestion of extended-release tablets in a small number of cases. Treatment of the bezoar may be dependent on several factors, including the location, composition, and size of the bezoar, and patient symptoms. In the setting of acute overdose, endoscopic removal may be necessary. For symptomatic bezoars, surgery may be necessary if the bezoar cannot be removed endoscopically (Wells et al, 2006; Niezabitowski et al, 2000; Taylor et al, 1998).
    J) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) 4-AMINOPYRIDINE
    a) SUMMARY: Preliminary investigation suggests that 4-aminopyridine (a potassium channel inhibitor) may antagonize the effects of calcium channel blockers by facilitating inward calcium movement (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    1) Additional clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of 4-aminopyridine for treatment of calcium antagonist overdose.
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) Equivocal benefits were reported following 10 mg of 4-aminopyridine in a 67-year-old man poisoned with verapamil (ter Wee et al, 1985).
    b) A 47-year-old woman intentionally ingested 20 1-mg tablets of lorazepam and 40 5-mg tablets of amlodipine and presented to the emergency department 7 hours later with a blood pressure of 124/65 mmHg and a heart rate of 75 bpm. Despite activated charcoal administration, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate continued to decrease to 90/38 mmHg and 58 bpm, respectively. Following intravenous administration of 4-aminopyridine at a dosage regimen of 50 mcg/kg/hour over a 3-hour period, her blood pressure increased to 110/50 mmHg and her heart rate increased to 68 bpm (Wilffert et al, 2007).
    3) ANIMAL DATA
    a) The effectiveness of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and Bay K 8644 (calcium channel activator) were evaluated in verapamil-poisoned Wistar rats. Both agents were able to increase survival time with 70% of the animals surviving in the 4-AP-treated group and 50% surviving in the Bay K 8644-treated group. Average survival in the control groups was 20% for the calcium group and 40% for the adrenaline group, respectively.
    b) MECHANISM: 4-AP has an indirect effect on calcium channels and is able to block potassium K(1) channels on the cytoplasm side leading to depolarization and opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels resulting in improved blood pressure and heart rate. Bay K 644 evokes the release of calcium from endoplasmic reticulum and activation of the calcium ion influx to improve the contraction of the vascular smooth muscle and myocardium and electrical conduction in the heart.
    c) The authors concluded that despite its dose-dependent epileptogenic action (easily controlled in this study with antiepileptic therapy), 4-AP was the most effective therapy (Magdalan, 2003).
    d) 4-Aminopyridine reversed verapamil toxicity in artificially ventilated cats (Agoston et al, 1984).
    2) LEVOSIMENDAN
    a) CASE REPORTS: Two patients who overdosed on calcium antagonists and developed cardiovascular collapse, unresponsive to conventional therapies, improved and then recovered without sequelae following levosimendan infusions (Varpula et al, 2009).
    1) The first patient, a 47-year-old woman, became severely hypotensive and developed asystole, that required ventricular pacing, after ingesting 16 g of verapamil. Despite calcium, glucagon, epinephrine boluses, norepinephrine, continuous vasopressin infusion, insulin and glucose infusion, intra aortic balloon pump, her mean arterial pressure (MAP) could not be maintained above 50 mmHg. Levosimendan was then initiated at an initial loading dose of 2 mcg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.2 mcg/kg/hour that was continued for 30 hours. Within 2 hours of initiating levosimendan, MAP could be maintained at 60 mmHg without epinephrine boluses, and she eventually recovered with normal neurologic function.
    2) The second patient, a 38-year-old man, became comatose and acidotic, with an unmeasurable mean arterial pressure (MAP), after ingesting 630 mg amlodipine, 300 mg of zopiclone, and an unknown amount of citalopram and acetaminophen. Despite conventional treatment with glucagon, calcium, vasopressors, and insulin and glucose, the patient's condition deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, worsening acidosis, right ventricular dilation, and a left ventricle ejection fraction (LEVF) of 38%. Levosimendan was then initiated at an infusion rate of 0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Ninety minutes after initiation of therapy, the patient's LVEF improved to 72%. The patient gradually recovered and was discharged approximately 11 days postingestion.
    b) ANIMAL DATA: The efficacy of levosimendan, an inotropic agent, on cardiac output, blood pressure, and heart rate was assessed in rats following intoxication with verapamil, infused at 6 mg/kg/hr until mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 50% of baseline, then the infusion was reduced to 4 mg/kg/hr. There were 5 treatment groups evaluated: normal saline infusion (control), calcium chloride as a loading dose and infusion, levosimendan 24 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.6 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-24), levosimendan 6 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-6), and levosimendan 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion with calcium chloride loading dose and infusion (Levo + CaCl2). The results showed that although the Levo-6 and Levo-24 groups showed statistically significant improvement in blood pressure compared to the control group (p <0.05) from t=20 minutes, the rats continued to be hypotensive with no improvement in blood pressure from that observed at t=0 minutes (peak verapamil toxicity prior to treatment administration). Cardiac output was significantly higher in all treatment groups as compared with the control group from t=20 minutes, except for Levo-6, which showed a significant improvement from t=30 minutes, and heart rate was maintained at pre-toxicity levels in all treatment groups. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that further investigation is warranted in order to consider levosimendan as an effective agent for the treatment of verapamil poisoning (Graudins et al, 2008).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Verapamil is highly protein bound (90%) (Prod Info ISOPTIN(R) SR oral sustained-release tablets, 2011; Prod Info COVERA-HS(R) oral extended-release controlled-onset tablets, 2011). It is unlikely that hemodialysis would be beneficial following exposure.
    2) Case reports have shown very limited evidence that hemoperfusion (lowered blood concentration but the patient died), albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS) or plasmapheresis may be effective. Both of these methods can remove protein bound drugs, but definitive evidence is lacking that clinical improvement will occur.
    B) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) In general, the large volumes of distribution and high protein binding of all calcium channel blocking agents would suggest hemodialysis or hemoperfusion would have limited usefulness in removal of significant quantities of these drugs.
    2) Five hours of combined hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion was associated with a decline in verapamil concentration from 687 to 192 ng/mL in a 48-year-old with occult liver disease and anuric acute renal failure. However, hypotension and acidosis did not resolve and the patient died 8 hours after the completion of dialysis and hemoperfusion (Rosansky, 1991).
    C) PLASMAPHERESIS
    1) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed severe hypotension and bradycardia requiring resuscitation and transvenous pacing after ingesting 2.4 and 9.6 g of verapamil, respectively. Initial blood concentrations were 5180 and 1856 ng/mL, respectively. Plasmapheresis was begun within 4 hours of ingestion. In both cases, blood concentrations decreased markedly (from 5180 ng/mL to 1272 ng/mL after 4 hours in the first patient and from 1856 ng/mL to 485 ng/mL after 7 hours in the second patient). In the first patient, cardiovascular improvement was noted during therapy, however, the patient died 38 hours after exposure of multiorgan failure; verapamil blood concentration was below 500 ng/mL. The second patient survived with no permanent sequelae (Kuhlmann et al, 1999).
    D) ALBUMIN DIALYSIS
    1) Albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy was performed on 3 patients (a 55-year-old woman, a 13-year-old girl, and a 43-year-old man) who developed refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after ingesting 8.4 g sustained-release diltiazem, 4.2 g sustained-release diltiazem, and 14.4 g slow-release verapamil, respectively. Serum diltiazem concentrations in the 55-year-old and the 13-year-old were 2,658 mcg/L and 8,580 mcg/L, respectively, and the serum verapamil concentration was 2,200 mcg/L. Following dialysis, serum calcium antagonist concentrations decreased significantly in all 3 patients, with full recovery of myocardial function and normalization of renal function (Pichon et al, 2011).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose is variable depending on the particular formulation of verapamil. The following doses are considered to be potentially toxic: ADULT DOSE: Greater than 120 mg immediate release or chewed sustained release or greater than 480 mg sustained release formulation. PEDIATRIC DOSE: Greater than 2.5 mg/kg. Single ingestions of therapeutic adult doses in children have resulted in death. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and the elderly tend to be more susceptible to the cardiac effects. In general, ingestions of phenylalkylamines (eg, verapamil) are more serious than ingestions of other calcium antagonists (ie, dihydropyridines (nifedipine)).
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Titrate to desired effect based on indication (range, 240 mg to 480 mg daily), dose should not exceed 480 mg/day. SUSTAINED RELEASE: Initial therapy: 180 mg daily. EXTENDED RELEASE: Typical dose is 200 mg daily at bedtime; maximum 400 mg daily. PEDIATRIC: Varies by indication. The pediatric maximum single therapeutic dose of verapamil is 2.5 mg/kg

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE
    1) ORAL TABLETS
    a) ANGINA: 80 to 120 mg ORALLY 3 times daily; MAX: 480 mg/day (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) ARRHYTHMIAS: 240 to 320 mg ORALLY in 3 to 4 divided doses daily; MAX: 480 mg/day (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    c) HYPERTENSION: 80 mg 3 times daily; MAX: 480 mg/day (there is no evidence that dosages beyond 360 mg provided added benefit) (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) EXTENDED-RELEASE
    1) FILM-COATED TABLET
    a) INITIAL: 180 mg ORALLY daily in the morning; may be titrated up to 360 mg in 2 divided doses (Prod Info verapamil HCl oral film coated extended release tablets, 2014).
    2) CAPSULE
    a) INITIAL: 200 mg ORALLY once daily; may be titrated up to 400 mg (Prod Info Verelan PM extended-release oral capsules, 2014).
    b) ADMINISTRATION: Swallow whole or sprinkle capsule contents onto applesauce; DO NOT crush or chew (Prod Info Verelan PM extended-release oral capsules, 2014).
    3) SUSTAINED-RELEASE
    a) INITIAL: 180 mg ORALLY once daily; may be titrated up to 480 mg in 2 divided doses; MAX: 480 mg daily (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    b) Tablets should be swallowed whole and NOT chewed, broken or crushed (Prod Info ISOPTIN(R) SR oral sustained-release tablets, 2011).
    C) INTRAVENOUS
    1) SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYARRHYTHMIAS: INITIAL: 5 to 10 mg IV bolus over at least 2 minutes; may repeat 10 mg dose after 30 minutes if inadequate response (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    2) ADMINISTRATION: IV use only (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS AND CAPSULES
    1) The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established (Prod Info verapamil HCl oral film coated extended release tablets, 2014; Prod Info Verelan PM extended-release oral capsules, 2014).
    B) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE TABLETS
    1) The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYDYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) ACUTE TREATMENT
    a) UNDER 1 YEAR
    1) INTRAVENOUS: INITIAL: 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg body weight via IV bolus over at least 2 minutes: MAX: 2 mg/dose (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011; Paul et al, 2000; Porter et al, 1983; Shahar et al, 1981); may be repeated after 30 minutes (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011; Paul et al, 2000)
    2) ADMINISTRATION: IV use only (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    b) 1 TO 15 YEARS
    1) INTRAVENOUS: INITIAL: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg body weight via IV bolus over at least 2 minutes; MAX: 5 mg/dose (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011; Paul et al, 2000; Porter et al, 1983; Shahar et al, 1981); may be repeated after 30 minutes; MAX single dose: 10 mg (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    2) ADMINISTRATION: IV use only (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    c) 15 YEARS OR OLDER
    1) INTRAVENOUS: INITIAL: 5 to 10 mg IV bolus over at least 2 minutes; may be repeated with 10 mg after 30 minutes (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    2) ADMINISTRATION: IV use only (Prod Info CALAN(R) intravenous injection, 2011)
    2) CHRONIC TREATMENT
    a) Immediate-release formulation: 3 to 7 mg/kg/day orally in 3 divided doses (Sahney, 2006; Paul et al, 2000; Piovan et al, 1995; Shahar et al, 1990); MAX: 480 mg/day (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    D) HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
    1) Immediate-release formulation: 3 to 7 mg/kg/day orally in 3 divided doses (Sahney, 2006; Pacileo et al, 2000; Moran & Colan, 1998; Piovan et al, 1995; Spicer et al, 1984); MAX: 480 mg/day (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2011).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) SUMMARY: Six deaths occurred in a series of 30 published cases of verapamil toxicity. Doses were not reported for 3 of the 6 cases. The lowest lethal dose in an adult was 1.4 g, ingested over 3 days, in a patient with preexisting liver disease (Hofer et al, 1993).
    b) A 51-year-old man died from multi-organ failure approximately 40 hours after intentionally ingesting 30 240-mg verapamil SR tablets (total amount ingested 7200 mg) (Tracqui et al, 2003).
    c) A 22-year-old man died following ingestion of 7.2 to 9.6 g of sustained-release verapamil (MacDonald & Alguire, 1992).
    d) A 57-year-old woman, with mild chronic renal failure, died after ingesting up to 960 mg of sustained-release verapamil. Autopsy revealed mild myocardial fibrosis, bilateral pulmonary edema, atherosclerosis, and chronic pyelonephritis, and toxicologic analysis of the heart blood revealed a verapamil concentration of 6 mg/L. It is believed that the patient's renal insufficiency may have resulted in decreased clearance of the verapamil, thereby contributing to her death (Batalis et al, 2007).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) A fatality was reported in a 25-month-old boy who ingested 1.44 g (106.7 mg/kg) of sustained-release verapamil (Hendren et al, 1989).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Patients with the following inadvertent single substance ingestions are considered to have the potential to develop toxicity and should be referred to a healthcare facility (IR = immediate release, SR = sustained release, XR= extended release) (Olson et al, 2005):
    a) VERAPAMIL: ADULT: Greater than 120 mg IR or chewed SR, or greater than 480 mg SR; CHILD: greater than 2.5 mg/kg
    2) Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and the elderly tend to be more susceptible to the cardiac effects. Due to the wide variety of products available, toxicity may vary widely (Cohen et al, 2009).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) SUMMARY: In adults, survival has been reported following ingestion of as much as 16 g of standard release verapamil (Horowitz & Rhee, 1989) and up to 9.6 g of sustained-release (Tuka et al, 2009; Kozlowski et al, 1988).
    b) SUSTAINED RELEASE: Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema was reported in two 19-year-old women following overdose ingestions of sustained-release verapamil in doses ranging from 6000 to 7200 mg. Both patients recovered following supportive care (SamiKarti et al, 2002).
    c) SUSTAINED RELEASE: Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema developed in an adult following an intentional ingestion of 3.6 g of sustained release verapamil, fluoxetine 400 mg and sustained release carbamazepine 1800 mg and an unknown amount of alcohol. A comprehensive drug screen was also positive for oxycodone and another opiate. He recovered completely following intensive supportive care (Siddiqi et al, 2013).
    d) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: A 59-year-old man intentionally ingested 2.4 g of immediate release verapamil and alcohol. Upon admission (2.5 hours after ingestion), his heart rate was 30 beats/min (complete heart block) with a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg. Despite activated charcoal, gastric lavage, pharmacologic support, and transvenous pacing, hypotension persisted and about 5 hours after ingestion the patient had a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated but an hour later ventricular fibrillation occurred. Other complications included oliguria and metabolic acidosis. Inotropic support (ie, dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline) was needed for 3 days to maintain an adequate systolic pressure. The patient was extubated on day 5. He was discharged to home on day 11 completely recovered with no cardiac or neurologic deficits (Buckley & Aronson, 1995).
    e) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 60-year-old man with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus inadvertently ingested 5 tablets of Tarka(R) (trandolapril/verapamil extended release 4-240 mg daily) and presented about 8 hours after ingestion complaining of dizziness and a fall at home. Hypotension and bradycardia were present. Despite treatment with fluids, calcium chloride, activated charcoal and a modified dose of hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy and glucagon, hypotension persisted. The patient clinically improved once glucagon was stopped (significant vomiting occurred) and dopamine was added. Seventeen hours after exposure, his heart rate and blood pressure were stable (Cohen et al, 2009).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) Survival was reported in an 11-month-old female who ingested 400 mg of verapamil. Lethargy, respiratory arrest, bradycardia, hypotension, and tonic-clonic seizures were observed (Passal & Crespin, 1984).
    b) A 14-year-old boy developed lactic acidosis (pH 7.08, lactate concentration 19.1 mEq/L) after ingesting 30 180-mg sustained-release verapamil tablets. The patient recovered with supportive care (George, 2010).
    c) FIXED DOSE COMBINATION PRODUCT: A 3.5 year-old girl presented with somnolence 7 hours after unintentionally ingesting 6 Tarka(R) tablets containing verapamil 240 mg (total dose, 1440 mg) and trandolapril 4 mg (total dose, 24 mg) in each tablet. Initially, vital signs were stable and the child was normotensive (BP 80/60 mm Hg). Approximately 5 hours later, arterial pressure (BP 50/20 mm Hg) and heart rate (58 beats/min) declined and an ECG showed complete AV block. Treatment included fluid resuscitation, dopamine, adrenalin and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. A temporary pacemaker was added due to persistent bradycardia and hypotension. Within 8 hours of inserting the temporary pacemaker, dopamine and adrenalin had been discontinued following gradual weaning of the infusions. Normal cardiac function was noted at 13 hours and the pacemaker was stopped. On day 3, the child was discharged completely recovered (Dogan et al, 2011).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) Plasma/serum concentration considered therapeutic was stated to be 0.02 to 0.25 mcg/mL (Schulz & Schmoldt, 2003).
    2) SUSTAINED RELEASE: A maximum plasma concentration of 77 ng/mL occurred 9.8 hours after dosing with 240 mg of a sustained-release capsule (Prod Info Verelan(R), 1999).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) POSTMORTEM
    a) POTENTIALLY FATAL CONCENTRATIONS: In a review of 65 verapamil overdoses in 2 medical centers over 8 years, clinical and laboratory parameters were measured and verapamil blood concentrations of greater than 5 micromolar on admission was predictive of life-threatening toxicity (ie, cardiac arrest or extracorporeal life support) (Megarbane et al, 2010).
    b) LETHAL drug concentrations have ranged from 690 ng/mL in a 48-year-old man with preexisting liver failure who ingested 1.4 g over 3 days to 8800 nanograms/mL in a 40-year-old woman following an unknown ingestion (Hofer et al, 1993). Postmortem verapamil concentrations as low as 590 nanograms/mL have been associated with fatalities (Krenzelok, 1991).
    c) SUSTAINED RELEASE: Blood contained 7 mg/L of verapamil, 2 mg/L of butabarbital, and 0.2 mg/L of flurazepam on autopsy of a 70-year-old woman (Koepke & McBay, 1987).
    d) SUSTAINED RELEASE: Blood concentrations of greater than 2000 ng/mL at 26 and 31 hours after intentional ingestion of between 15 to 20 g of sustained-release verapamil were recorded; death occurred at 39 hours after ingestion. Autopsy blood concentrations of 2700 ng/mL and liver concentrations of 30 mg/kg were reported (Buckley et al, 1993).
    e) SUSTAINED RELEASE: Postmortem heart blood concentration of a 57-year-old woman, who ingested up to 960 mg of sustained-release verapamil, was 6 mg/L (Batalis et al, 2007).
    2) SURVIVAL
    a) SUMMARY: TOXIC concentrations associated with recovery range from 367 ng/mL approximately 1 hour after an unknown amount of verapamil was ingested to 4000 ng/mL approximately 5 hours after ingestion of 3200 mg (Watling et al, 1992; Kivisto et al, 1997).
    b) SUSTAINED RELEASE: A serum verapamil concentration of 800 ng/mL was reported in a 61-year-old woman following ingestion of approximately 7.2 g of sustained-release verapamil tablets. The patient developed no permanent sequelae (Vadlamudi & Wijdicks, 2002).
    c) SUSTAINED RELEASE: A serum verapamil concentration of 3600 nanograms/mL, in a 79-year-old man, was obtained approximately 1.5 hours following ingestion of 6 to 7.2 g of sustained-release verapamil. Following intensive supportive therapy, the patient recovered (Tuka et al, 2009).
    d) DELAYED RELEASE: A 43-year-old man developed refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after intentionally ingesting 14.4 g slow-release verapamil. The serum verapamil concentration was 2,200 mcg/L (therapeutic range, 30 to 170 mcg/L). Following treatment with albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy, serum verapamil concentration decreased significantly, with full recovery of myocardial function and normalization of renal function (Pichon et al, 2011).

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) VERAPAMIL

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) SUMMARY: Calcium antagonists selectively inhibit membrane transport of calcium during the slow inward excitation-contraction coupling phase in cardiac and vascular smooth muscle. Intracellular calcium ion outflow may also be speeded through stimulation of ATP dependent Ca and Na-K pumps.
    1) Negative inotropic (contractility) effects on the myocardium are usually compensated for by reflex sympathetic nervous system mechanisms.
    2) Antiarrhythmic effects are due to delayed antegrade conduction through the AV node, although direct SA node effects may also be involved.
    3) Dilation of coronary and peripheral arteries and arterioles decreases afterload and also prevents coronary arterial spasm; other protective cardiac effects unrelated to coronary blood flow have been proposed.
    4) Antiplatelet effects may also provide beneficial effects in ischemic heart disease (Ferrari & Visioli, 1991).
    B) CARDIOVASCULAR
    1) Calcium antagonists selectively inhibit membrane transport of calcium during the slow inward excitation-contraction coupling phase in smooth muscle leading to coronary and peripheral vasodilation. In general, they have a negative inotropic (contractility) effect on the myocardium (Singh et al, 1978) not usually manifested with therapeutic doses due to compensation of the sympathetic nervous system.
    2) Verapamil in a single 240 mg dose given to 18 patients with essential arterial hypertension resulted in no significant change in heart rate but prominently reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Most LV performance indices were depressed by a single large dose of verapamil (Ortiz et al, 1986). They depress the rate of sinus node discharge and inhibit conduction velocity through the AV node (Antman et al, 1980) to varying degrees.
    3) Verapamil decreases heart rate and afterload (Stone et al, 1980).
    4) Verapamil administration results in depression of AV conduction to a greater degree and greater vasodilation than the other agents commercially available, which may account for a greater number of deaths associated with verapamil (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS
    1) Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, is a lipophilic, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances (Siddiqi et al, 2013).
    2) Cardiovascular effects that occur in overdose, as related to the specific class of calcium channel blockers, are as follows (Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007):
    a) Vasodilation: Dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine) > phenylalkalamines (e.g., verapamil) > benzothiazepines (e.g., diltiazem)
    b) Chronotropic suppression (SA node): Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    c) Suppression of conduction (AV node): Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    d) Inotropy (contractility): Phenylalkalamines >>benzothiazepines>dihydropyridines
    B) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) In general, calcium channel antagonists decrease pancreatic insulin secretion and induce systemic insulin resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004). An in vitro study showed that dysregulation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, an insulin-dependent pathway, may contribute to the development of insulin resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia in the setting of calcium channel antagonist toxicity (Bechtel et al, 2008).
    2) It has been demonstrated in humans that insulin response to glucose is acutely inhibited by infusion of verapamil, apparently a result of interference with calcium entry into the pancreatic islets beta cell (De Marinis & Barbarino, 1980).
    C) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
    1) Decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance, and poor tissue perfusion and substrate delivery may be related to the occurrence of metabolic acidosis associated with calcium channel blocker (CCB) poisoning (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004). Another contributing factor may be the CCBs interference with glucose catabolism via inhibition of calcium-stimulated mitochondrial activity, thereby leading to lactate production and ATP hydrolysis.
    D) PSYCHOSIS
    1) Excessive dopaminergic influences may be responsible since calcium antagonism leads to stimulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in dopaminergic neurons (Kahn, 1986); however, confusion and disorientation due to hypoperfusion may be mistaken for psychosis.

Physical Characteristics

    A) VERAPAMIL HYDROCHLORIDE is an almost white crystalline powder which is practically odor free and has a bitter taste and is soluble in water, chloroform, and methanol (Prod Info CALAN(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info Verelan PM(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2010).

Molecular Weight

    A) VERAPAMIL HYDROCHLORIDE: 491.07 (Prod Info Verelan PM(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2010).

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Agarwal A, Yu SW, Rehman A, et al: Hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker overdose: a case report. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39(4):575-578.
    3) Agoston S, Maestrone E, & van Hezik EJ: Effective treatment of verapamil intoxication with 4-aminopyridine in the cat. J Clin Invest 1984; 73:1291-1296.
    4) American College of Medical Toxicology : ACMT Position Statement: Interim Guidance for the Use of Lipid Resuscitation Therapy. J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(1):81-82.
    5) American College of Medical Toxicology: ACMT position statement: guidance for the use of intravenous lipid emulsion. J Med Toxicol 2016; Epub:Epub-.
    6) Anderson P, Bondesson U, & Sylven C: Clinical pharmacokinetics of verapamil in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Clin Pharmacol 1982; 23:49-57.
    7) Anthony T, Jastremski M, & Elliot W: Charcoal hemoperfusion for the treatment of a combined diltiazem and metoprolol overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1344-1348.
    8) Antman EM, Stone PH, & Muller JE: Calcium channel blocking agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Part I: Basic and clinical electrophysiologic effects. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:875-885.
    9) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    10) Azendour H , Belyamani L , Atmani M , et al: Severe amlodipine intoxication treated by hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy. J Emerg Med 2010; 38(1):33-35.
    11) Bania TC, Chu J, Perez E, et al: Hemodynamic effects of intravenous fat emulsion in an animal model of severe verapamil toxicity resuscitated with atropine, calcium, and saline. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14(2):105-111.
    12) Barrow PM, Houston PL, & Wong DT: Overdose of sustained-release verapamil. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72:361-365.
    13) Barry JD, Durkovich D, Cantrell L, et al: Vasopressin treatment of verapamil toxicity in the porcine model. J Med Toxicol 2005; 1(1):3-10.
    14) Batalis NI, Harley RA, & Schandl CA: Verapamil toxicity: an unusual case report and review of the literature. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2007; 28(2):137-140.
    15) Bechtel LK, Haverstick DM, & Holstege CP: Verapamil toxicity dysregulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15(4):368-374.
    16) Belson MG, Gorman SE, & Sullivan K: Calcium channel blocker ingestions in children. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18:581-586.
    17) Boyer EW, Duic PA, & Evans A: Hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker poisoning. Ped Emerg Care 2002; 18:36-37.
    18) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    19) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    20) Buckley CD & Aronson JK: Prolonged half-life of verapamil in a case of overdose: implications for therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39(6):680-683.
    21) Buckley N, Dawson AH, & Howarth D: Slow-release verapamil poisoning: use of polyethylene glycol whole-bowel lavage and high-dose calcium. Med J Aust 1993; 158:202-204.
    22) Buckley NA, Whyte IM, & Dawson AH: Overdose with calcium channel blockers (letter). Br Med J 1994; 308:1639.
    23) Candell J, Valle V, & Soler M: Acute intoxication with verapamil. Chest 1979; 75:200-201.
    24) Cantrell FL, Clark RF, & Manoguerra AS: Determining triage guidelines for unintentional overdoses with calcium channel antagonists. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):849-853.
    25) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    26) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    27) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    28) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    29) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    30) Christian MR, Pallasch EM, Wahl M, et al: Lipid rescue 911: are poison centers recommending intravenous fat emulsion therapy for severe poisoning?. J Med Toxicol 2013; 9(3):231-234.
    31) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    32) Clark RF & Hanna TC: Calcium channel blocker toxicity. Top Emerg Med 1993; 15:15-26.
    33) Cohen V, Jellinek SP, Fancher L, et al: Tarka(R) (Trandolapril/Verapamil Hydrochloride Extended-Release) overdose. J Emerg Med 2009; Epub:--.
    34) De Cicco M, Macor F, & Robieux I: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of high-dose continuous intravenous verapamil infusion: Clinical experience in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:332-339.
    35) De Marinis L & Barbarino A: Calcium antagonists and hormone release. I. Effects of verapamil on insulin release in normal subjects and patients with islet-cell tumor. Metabolism 1980; 29:599-604.
    36) DeRoos FJ: Calcium Channel Blockers. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicological Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    37) DeWitt CR & Waksman JC: Pharmacology, pathophysiology and management of calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker toxicity. Toxicol Rev 2004; 23:223-238.
    38) Dogan M, Basaranoglu M, Peker E, et al: Tarka(R) overdose in a young child. Hum Exp Toxicol 2011; 30(9):1392-1398.
    39) Donovan JW, O'Donnell S, & Burkhart K: Calcium channel blocker overdose causing mesenteric ischemia (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:628.
    40) Doyon S & Roberts JR: The use of glucagon in a case of calcium channel blocker overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1229-1233.
    41) Durward A, Guerguerian AM, Lefebvre M, et al: Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care 2003; 4(3):372-376.
    42) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    43) Engebretsen KM, Kaczmarek KM, Morgan J, et al: High-dose insulin therapy in beta-blocker and calcium channel-blocker poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011; 49(4):277-283.
    44) Enyeart JJ, Price WA, & Hoffman DA: Profound hyperglycemia and metabolic acidosis after verapamil overdose. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2:1228-1231.
    45) Erickson FC, Ling LJ, & Grande GA: Diltiazem overdose: case report and review. J Emerg Med 1991; 9:357-366.
    46) Evans JSM & Oram MP: Neurological recovery after prolonged verapamil-induced cardiac arrest. Anaes Intens Care 1999; 27:653-655.
    47) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    48) Ferrari R & Visioli O: Calcium channel blockers and ischemic heart disease: theoretical expectations and clinical experience. Eur Heart J 1991; 12:18-24.
    49) Franxman TJ, Al-Nabhan M, Cavallazzi RS, et al: Lipid emulsion therapy for verapamil overdose. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154(4):292.
    50) Frierson J, Bailly D, & Shultz T: Refractory cardiogenic shock and complete heart block after suspected verapamil-SR and atenolol overdose. Clin Cardiol 1991; 14:933-935.
    51) George M: Severe lactic acidosis in a patient after calcium channel blocker toxicity. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010; 26(1):68.
    52) Gokel Y, Paydas S, & Duru M: High-dose verapamil-trandolapril induced rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18:738-739.
    53) Goldschmidt N, Azaz-Livshits T, & Gotsman I: Compound cardiac toxicity of oral erythromycin and verapamil. Ann Pharmacother 2001; 35:1396-1399.
    54) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    55) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    56) Graudins A, Najafi J, & Rur-SC MP: Treatment of experimental verapamil poisoning with levosimendan utilizing a rodent model of drug toxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(1):50-56.
    57) Greene SL, Gawarammana I, Wood DM, et al: Relative safety of hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of calcium channel blocker overdose: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33(11):2019-2024.
    58) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    59) Hantsch C, Seger D, & Meredith T: Calcium channel antagonist toxicity and hypercalcemia (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:495-496.
    60) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    61) Haynes RC, Murad F, & Gilman AG: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Macmillan Publishing Co, New York, NY, 1985, pp 1521.
    62) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    63) Henderson A, Stevenson N, & Hackett LP: Diltiazem overdose in an elderly patient: efficacy of adrenaline. Anesth Intens Care 1992; 20:507-510.
    64) Hendren WG, Schieber RS, & Garrettson LK: Extracorporeal bypass for the treatment of verapamil poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:984-987.
    65) Henrikson CA & Chandra-Strobos N: Calcium channel blocker overdose mimicking an acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation 2003; 59:361-364.
    66) Herbert JX, O'Malley C, & Tracey JA: Verapamil overdosage unresponsive to dextrose/insulin therapy (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:293-294.
    67) Hofer CA, Smith JK, & Tenholder MF: Verapamil intoxication: a literature review of overdoses and discussion of therapeutic options. Am J Med 1993; 95:431-438.
    68) Holzer M, Sterz F, & Schoerkhuber W: Successful resuscitation of a verapamil-intoxicated patient with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2818-2823.
    69) Horowitz BZ & Rhee KJ: Massive verapamil ingestion: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7:624-631.
    70) Howarth DM, Dawson AH, & Smith AJ: Calcium channel blocking drug overdose: am Australian series. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:161-166.
    71) Hung YM & Olson KR: Acute amlodipine overdose treated by high dose intravenous calcium in a patient with severe renal insufficiency. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(3):301-303.
    72) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    73) Izdes S, Altintas ND, & Soykut C: Acute respiratory distress syndrome after verapamil intoxication: case report and literature review. Acta Clin Belg 2014; 69(2):116-119.
    74) Jaeger A, Sauder P, & Kopferschmitt J: Diltiazem acute poisoning: hemodynamic and kinetic study (abstract 191). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    75) Kahn JK: Nifedipine-associated acute psychosis. Am J Med 1986; 81:705-706.
    76) Kamijo Y, Yoshida T, Ide A, et al: Mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring in calcium channel blocker poisoning: tissue hypoxia avoidance despite hypotension. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24(3):357-360.
    77) Kanagarajan K, Marraffa JM, Bouchard NC, et al: The use of vasopressin in the setting of recalcitrant hypotension due to calcium channel blocker overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(1):56-59.
    78) Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al: Use of calcium channel blockers and risk of hospitalized gastrointestinal tract bleeding.. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:1849-1855.
    79) Kates RE, Keefe DL, & Schwartz J: Verapamil disposition kinetics in chronic atrial fibrillation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30:44-51.
    80) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    81) Kivisto KT, Neuvonen PJ, & Tarssanen L: Pharmacokinetics of verapamil in overdose. Hum Experiment Toxicol 1997; 16:35-37.
    82) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    83) Koepke JF & McBay AJ: Fatal verapamil poisoning. J Foren Sci 1987; 32:1431-1434.
    84) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    85) Kounis NG: Asystole after verapamil and digoxin. Br J Clin Pract 1980; 34:57-58.
    86) Kozlowski JH, Kozlowski JA, & Schuller D: Poisoning with sustained-release verapamil. Am J Med 1988; 85:127.
    87) Krenzelok EP: Acute calcium channel blocker overdosage. Clin Tox Forum 1991; 3:1-6.
    88) Krick SE, Gums JG, & Grauer K: Severe verapamil (sustained-release) overdose. DICP Ann Pharmacother 1990; 24:705-706.
    89) Kuhlmann U, Schoenemann H, Muller TF, et al: Plasmapheresis in fatal overdose with verapamil. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25(12):1473-1473.
    90) Kuo MJ, Tseng YZ, & Chen TF: Verapamil overdose and severe hypocalcemia (letter). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1992; 30:309-311.
    91) Laberge P, Martineau P, & Sebajang H: Verapamil intoxication after substitution of immediate-release for extended-release verapamil. Am J Health- Syst Pharm 2001; 58:402-405.
    92) Laine K, Kivisto KT, & Neuvonen PJ: Effect of delayed administration of activated charcoal on the absorption of conventional and slow-release verapamil. Clin Toxicol 1997a; 35:263-268.
    93) Laine K, Kivisto KT, & Neuvonen PJ: Effect of delayed administration of activated charcoal on the absorption of conventional and slow-release verapamil. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:263-268.
    94) Lapatto-Reiniluoto O, Kivisto KT, & Neuvonen PJ: Efficacy of activated charcoal versus gastric lavage half an hour after ingestion of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56:285-288.
    95) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    96) Leesar MA, Martyn R, & Talley JD: Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema complicating massive verapamil overdose. Chest 1994; 105:606-607.
    97) Leone M, Charvet A, Delmas A, et al: Terlipressin: a new therapeutic for calcium-channel blockers overdose (letter). J Crit Care 2005; 20:114-115.
    98) Levine M, Boyer EW, Pozner CN, et al: Assessment of hyperglycemia after calcium channel blocker overdoses involving diltiazem or verapamil. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(9):2071-2075.
    99) Levine M, Curry SC, Padilla-Jones A, et al: Critical Care Management ofVerapamil and Diltiazem Overdose With a Focus on Vasopressors: A 25-Year Experience at a Single Center. Ann Emerg Med 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    100) Lheureux PE, Zahir S, Gris M, et al: Bench-to-bedside review: Hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of overdose of calcium-channel blockers. Crit Care (Lond) 2006; 10(3):212-.
    101) Liang CW, Diamond SJ, & Hagg DS: Lipid rescue of massive verapamil overdose: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2011; 5:399-399.
    102) Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, et al: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126(3):477-480.
    103) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    104) Linowiecki KA, Tillman DJ, & Ruggles D: Radiopacity of modified release cardiac medications: a case report and invitro analysis (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:350.
    105) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    106) Luscher TF, Noll G, & Sturmer T: Calcium gluconate in severe verapamil intoxication (letter). N Eng J Med 1994; 330:718-720.
    107) MacDonald D & Alguire PC: Case report: fatal overdose with sustained-release verapamil. Am J Med Sci 1992; 303:115-117.
    108) Magdalan J: New treatment methods in verapamil poisoning: experimental studies. Polish J Pharmacol 2003; 55:425-432.
    109) Mahr NC, Valdes A, & Lamas G: Use of glucagon for acute intravenous diltiazem toxicity. Amer J Cardiol 1997; 79:1570-1571.
    110) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    111) Martin C, Gonzalez H, Ruiz S, et al: Acute respiratory distress syndrome following verapamil overdose treated with intravenous lipid emulsion: a rare life-threatening complication. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2014; 33(6):e101-e102.
    112) McMillan R: Management of acute severe verapamil intoxication. J Emerg Med 1988; 6:193-196.
    113) Megarbane B, Karyo S, Abidi K, et al: Predictors of Mortality in Verapamil Overdose: Usefulness of Serum Verapamil Concentrations. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010; Epub:Epub.
    114) Melanson P, Shir RD, & DeRoos F: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in calcium channel blocker overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:345.
    115) Meyer M, Stremski E, & Scanlon M: Verapamil-induced hypotension reversed with dextrose-insulin (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:500.
    116) Minella RA & Schulman DS: Fatal verapamil toxicity and hypokalemia. Am Heart J 1991; 121:1810-1812.
    117) Mitchell LB, Schroeder JS, & Mason JW: Comparative clinical electrophysiologic effects of diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine: a review. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49:629-635.
    118) Moran AM & Colan SD : Verapamil therapy in infants with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Young 1998; 8(3):310-319.
    119) Moroni F, Mannaioni PF, & Dolara A: Calcium gluconate and hypertonic sodium chloride in a case of massive verapamil poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1980; 17:395-400.
    120) Morris DL & Goldschlager N: Calcium infusion for reversal of adverse effects of intravenous verapamil. JAMA 1983; 249:3212-3213.
    121) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    122) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    123) Niezabitowski LM, Nguyen BN, & Gums JG: Extended-release nifedipine bezoar identified one year after discontinuation. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34:862-864.
    124) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    125) Olson KR, Erdman AR, Woolf AD, et al: Calcium channel blocker ingestion: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):797-822.
    126) Ori Y, Korzets A, & Caneti M: Lymphocytic intracellular calcium in a patient with complicated verapamil overdose. Amer J Med Sci 2000; 319:63-67.
    127) Orr GM, Bodansky HJ, & Dymond DS: Fatal verapamil overdose. Lancet 1982; 2:1218-1219.
    128) Ortiz J, Matsumoto A, & Monaco CA: Left ventricular function after a single large dose of verapamil. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57:30D-34D.
    129) Pacileo G, De Cristofaro M, Russo MG, et al: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in pediatric patients: effect of verapamil on regional and global left ventricular diastolic function. Can J Cardiol 2000; 16(2):146-152.
    130) Papadopoulos J & O'Neil MG: Utilization of a glucagon infusion in the management of a massive nifedipine overdose. J Emerg Med 2000; 18:453-455.
    131) Passal DB & Crespin FH: Verapamil poisoning in an infant. Pediatrics 1984; 73:543-545.
    132) Paul T, Bertram H, Bokenkamp R, et al: Supraventricular tachycardia in infants, children and adolescents: diagnosis, and pharmacological and interventional therapy. Paediatr Drugs 2000; 2(3):171-181.
    133) Pearigen PD & Benowitz NL: Poisoning due to calcium antagonists. Experience with verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. Drug Safety 1991; 6:408-430.
    134) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    135) Perez E, Chu J, Bania T, et al: L-carnitine increases survival in a murine model of severe verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18(11):1135-1140.
    136) Perkins CM: Serious verapamil poisoning. Treatment with intravenous calcium gluconate. Br Med J 1978; 21:1127.
    137) Pichon N, Dugard A, Clavel M, et al: Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Three Cases of Acute Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning With Life-Threatening Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Ann Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub.
    138) Pillai U, Muzaffar J, Sen S, et al: Grapefruit juice and verapamil: a toxic cocktail. South Med J 2009; 102(3):308-309.
    139) Piovan D, Padrini R, Svalato Moreolo G, et al: Verapamil and norverapamil plasma levels in infants and children during chronic oral treatment. Ther Drug Monit 1995; 17(1):60-67.
    140) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    141) Porter CJ, Garson A, & Gillette PC: Verapamil: an effective calcium blocking agent for pediatric patients. Pediatrics 1983; 71:748-755.
    142) Price D, Radke J, & Albertson T: Hypocalcaemia after an occult calcium channel blocker overdose: a case report and literature review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2014; 114(2):217-221.
    143) Pritza DR, Bierman MH, & Hammeke MD: Acute toxic effects of sustained-release verapamil in chronic renal failure. Arch Int Med 1991; 151:2081-2084.
    144) Product Information: CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, verapamil HCl oral sustained release caplets. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.
    145) Product Information: CALAN(R) intravenous injection, verapamil HCl intravenous injection. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2011.
    146) Product Information: CALAN(R) oral tablets, verapamil HCl oral tablets. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2011.
    147) Product Information: CALAN(R) oral tablets, verapamil HCl oral tablets. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.
    148) Product Information: COVERA-HS(R) oral extended-release controlled-onset tablets, verapamil HCl oral extended-release controlled-onset tablets. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2011.
    149) Product Information: ISOPTIN(R) SR oral sustained-release tablets, verapamil HCl oral sustained-release tablets. Ranbaxy Laboratories Inc. (per FDA), Jacksonville, FL, 2011.
    150) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    151) Product Information: Verelan PM extended-release oral capsules, verapamil HCl extended-release oral capsules. Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc. (per FDA), Princeton, NJ, 2014.
    152) Product Information: Verelan PM(R) extended-release oral capsules, verapamil hydrochloride extended-release oral capsules. Schwarz Pharma, LLC, Smyrna, GA, 2010.
    153) Product Information: Verelan(R) PM oral extended-release capsules, verapamil HCl oral extended-release capsules. Schwarz Pharma, LLC (per FDA), Smyrna, GA, 2011.
    154) Product Information: Verelan(R), verapamil HCl. Schwarz Pharma, Milwaukee, WI, 1999.
    155) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    156) Product Information: dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (per DailyMed), Deerfield, IL, 2012.
    157) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    158) Product Information: inamrinone intravenous solution, inamrinone intravenous solution. Bedford Laboratories, Bedford, OH, 2002.
    159) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    160) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    161) Product Information: phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    162) Product Information: verapamil HCl oral film coated extended release tablets, verapamil HCl oral film coated extended release tablets. Glenmark Generics Inc.,USA (per DailyMed), Mahwah, NJ, 2014.
    163) Quezado Z, Lippmann M, & Wertheimer J: Severe cardiac, respiratory, and metabolic complications of massive verapamil overdose. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:436-438.
    164) Ramoska EA, Spiller HA, & Winter M: A one-year evaluation of calcium channel blocker overdoses: toxicity and treatment. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:196-200.
    165) Rankin RJ & Edwards IR: Overdose of sustained release verapamil (letter). NZ Med J 1990; 103:165.
    166) Ranniger C & Roche C: Are one or two dangerous? Calcium channel blocker exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 2007; 33(2):145-154.
    167) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    168) Rodgers GC, Al-Mahasneh QM, & White SL: Treatment of severe sustained release verapamil poisoning with cardiac pacing: a case report (abstract 190). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    169) Rona R, Cortinovis B, Marcolin R, et al: Extra-corporeal life support for near-fatal multi-drug intoxication: a case report. J Med Case Reports 2011; 5:231.
    170) Rosansky SJ: Verapamil toxicity-treatment with hemoperfusion (letter). Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:340-341.
    171) Sahney S: A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension. Paediatr Drugs 2006; 8(6):357-373.
    172) Sakurai H, Kei M, & Matsubara K: Cardiogenic shock triggered by verapamil and atenolol. A case report of therapeutic experience with intravenous calcium. Jpn Circ J 2000; 64:893-896.
    173) SamiKarti S, Ulusoy H, Yandi M, et al: Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema in the course of verapamil intoxication. Emerg Med J 2002; 19(5):458-459.
    174) Samniah N & Schlaeffer F: Cerebral infarction associated with oral verapamil overdose. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:365-369.
    175) Sampson CS & Bedy SM: Lipid emulsion therapy given intraosseously in massive verapamil overdose. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33(12):1844.
    176) Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Addario C, et al: Successful treatment with enoximone for severe poisoning with atenolol and verapamil: a case report. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48:790-792.
    177) Schulz M & Schmoldt A: Therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations of more than 800 drugs and other xenobiotics. Pharmazie 2003; 58(7):447-474.
    178) Schwab M, Oetzel C, & Morike K: Using trade names. A risk factor for accidental drug overdose. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:1065-1066.
    179) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    180) Senthilkumaran S, Balamurgan N, Sweni S, et al: Acute episode of reversible blindness after an overdose of beta blockers and calcium channel antagonist. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29(4):474.e5 – 474.e7.
    181) Shah AR & Passalacqua BR: Case report: sustained-release verapamil overdose causing stroke: an unusual complication. Am J Med Sci 1992; 304:357-359.
    182) Shahar E , Barzilay Z , & Frand M : Verapamil in the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in infants and children. J Pediatr 1981; 98(2):323-326.
    183) Shahar E , Sagy M , Koren G , et al: Calcium blocking agents in pediatric emergency care. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6(1):52-57.
    184) Shepherd G & Klein-Schwartz W: High-dose insulin therapy for calcium-channel blocker overdose. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39:923-930.
    185) Siddiqi TA, Hill J, Huckleberry Y, et al: Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema and life-threatening shock due to calcium channel blocker overdose and its management: a case report and a clinical review. Respir Care 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    186) Singh BN, Ellrodt G, & Peter CT: Verapamil: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 1978; 15:169-197.
    187) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    188) Sorrentino A: Update on pediatric resuscitation drugs: high dose, low dose, or no dose at all. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17(2):223-226.
    189) Spicer RL , Rocchini AP , Crowley DC , et al: Chronic verapamil therapy in pediatric and young adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53(11):1614-1619.
    190) Spiller HA, Meyers A, & Ziemba T: Delayed onset of cardiac arrhythmias from sustained-release verapamil. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:201-203.
    191) Sporer KA & Manning JJ: Massive ingestion of sustained-release verapamil with a concretion and bowel infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:603-605.
    192) Spurlock BW, Virani NA, & Henry CA: Verapamil overdose. West J Med 1991; 154:208-211.
    193) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    194) St-Onge M, Ajmo I, Poirier D, et al: L-Carnitine for the Treatment of a Calcium Channel Blocker and Metformin Poisoning. J Med Toxicol 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    195) Stajer D, Bervar M, & Horvat M: Cardiogenic shock following a single therapeutic oral dose of verapamil. Int J Clin Pract 2001; 55:69-70.
    196) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    197) Stone PH, Antman EM, & Muller JE: Calcium channel blocking agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Part II: Hemodynamic effects and clinical applications. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:886-904.
    198) Sun DK, Reiner D, & Frishman W: Adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 34:953-966.
    199) Szekely LA, Thompson BT, & Woolf A: Use of partial liquid ventilation to manage pulmonary complications of acute verapamil-sustained release poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:475-479.
    200) Takahashi h, Ohashi n, & Motokawa K: Poisoning caused by the combined ingestion of nifedipine and metoprolol. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:631-637.
    201) Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, & Kraus DM (Eds): Pediatric Dosage Handbook, 4th. Lexi-Comp, Inc, Cleveland, OH, 1997.
    202) Tanen DA, Ruha AM, & Curry SC: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is effective in the acute management of verapamil toxicity in a swine model. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36:547-553.
    203) Taylor JR, Streetman DS, & Castle SS: Medication Bezoars: a literature review and report of a case. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32:940-946.
    204) Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, et al: Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13(2):134-139.
    205) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    206) Tracqui A, Tournoud C, Kintz P, et al: HPLC/MS findings in a fatality involving sustained-release verapamil. Hum Exp Toxicol 2003; 22:515-521.
    207) Tuka V, Ricarova B, Janota T, et al: Surprisingly delayed escalation of severe verapamil poisoning. Eur J Emerg Med 2009; 16(2):100-102.
    208) Vadlamudi L & Wijdicks EFM: Multifocal myoclonus due to verapamil overdose. Neurol 2002; 58:984-985.
    209) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    210) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    211) Varpula T, Rapola J, Sallisalmi M, et al: Treatment of serious calcium channel blocker overdose with levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(3):790-792.
    212) Verbrugge LB & vanWezel HB: Pathophysiology of verapamil overdose: new insights in the role of insulin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21(3):406-409.
    213) Watling SM, Crain JL, & Edwards TD: Verapamil overdose: case report and review of the literature. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26:1373-1377.
    214) Welch CD, Knoerzer RE, & Lewis GS: Verapamil and acebutolol overdose results in asystole: intra-aortic balloon pump provides mechanical support. J Extra-Corporeal Tech 1992; 24:36-37.
    215) Wells CD, Luckritz TC, Rady MY, et al: Bezoar formation requiring endoscopic removal after intentional overdose of extended-release nifedipine. Pharmacotherapy 2006; 26(12):1802-1805.
    216) White RD, Goldsmith RS, & Rodrigues R: Plasma ionic calcium levels following injection of chloride, gluconate, and gluceptate salts of calcium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71:609-613.
    217) Wilffert B, Boskma RJ, vanderVoort PH, et al: 4-Aminopyridine (fampridine) effectively treats amlodipine poisoning: a case report. J Clin Pharm Ther 2007; 32(6):655-657.
    218) Wilimowska J, Piekoszewski W, Krzyanowska-Kierepka E, et al: Monitoring of verapamil enantiomers concentration in overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(2):169-171.
    219) Williamson KM & Dunham GD: Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in an overdose situation. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30:608-611.
    220) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    221) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    222) Wolff F, Breuker KH, & Schlensker KH: Prenatal diagnosis and therapy of fetal heart rate anomalies: with a contribution on the placental transfer of verapamil. J Perinat Med 1980; 8:203-208.
    223) Wood DM, Wright KD, Jones AL, et al: Metaraminol (Aramine(R)) in the management of a significant amlodipine overdose. Human Exp Toxicol 2005; 24:377-381.
    224) Young AC, Velez LI, & Kleinschmidt KC: Intravenous fat emulsion therapy for intentional sustained-release verapamil overdose. Resuscitation 2009; 80(5):591-593.
    225) Yuan TH, Kerns WP, & Tomaszewski CA: Insulin-glucose as adjunctive therapy for severe calcium channel antagonist poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:463-474.
    226) da Silva OA, de Melo RA, & Jorge Filho JP: Verapamil acute self-poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1979; 14:361-367.
    227) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    228) de Faire & Lundman T: Serious verapamil poisoning (letter). Br Med J 1978; 2:1574.
    229) de Faire U & Lundman T: Attempted suicide with verapamil. Eur J Cardiol 1977; 6:195-198.
    230) ter Wee PM, Kremer Hovinga TK, Uges DRA, et al: 4-Aminopyridine and haemodialysis in the treatment of verapamil intoxication. Human Toxicol 1985; 4:327-329.