MOBILE VIEW  | 

ARSENIC TRICHLORIDE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Arsenic trichloride is a colorless or yellow oily liquid, which fumes in air and has an unpleasant acrid odor and sweetish, metallic taste.

Specific Substances

    A) No Synonyms were found in group or single elements
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) As-Cl3

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Arsenic trichloride is a colorless or yellow oily liquid, which fumes in air and has an unpleasant acrid odor and sweetish, metallic taste (AAR, 1998; (Budavari, 1996; Hathaway et al, 1996; ITI, 1995; Sittig, 1991; Lewis, 1998; Lewis, 1997).
    2) Arsenic trichloride releases ARSENIC and HYDROCHLORIC ACID upon contact with water or when heated to decomposition (AAR, 1998; (Lewis, 1996; EPA, 1985; OHM/TADS , 1991; HSDB , 2000). Its toxicity is determined by both of these components.
    B) USES
    1) It is used in the ceramics and metallurgy industries, in the production of organic arsenical pharmaceuticals, herbicides, and insecticides, and in the synthesis of chloro- derivatives of arsine (Budavari, 1996; ITI, 1995; Harbison, 1998; Hathaway et al, 1996; Lewis, 1997; HSDB , 2000).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) Arsenic trichloride is a colorless or yellow oily liquid with an unpleasant, acrid odor which fumes in air. On contact with water or when heated to decomposition, arsenic and hydrochloric acid are released. The fumes are very irritating to the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes.
    1) Ingestion can cause severe irritation of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach. Laryngeal or tracheal edema may occur and compromise the airway. Severe esophageal erosions may be seen in ingestions. Direct dermal exposure can cause irritation and blistering. Following inhalation, ingestion, or dermal exposure, arsenic is absorbed systemically and arsenic poisoning results.
    B) Arsenic trichloride is mutagenic in bacteria, hamster embryo cells, and human leukocytes.
    C) Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces symptoms within 30 to 60 minutes, but onset may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. A metallic or garlic taste, vomiting, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and profuse watery (rice-water-like) and sometimes bloody diarrhea may occur. Dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are common. Hypovolemia from capillary leaking ("third spacing" of fluids) is a common early event.
    D) Systemic arsenic poisoning from occupational exposure is uncommon. Arsenic workers have developed a hoarse voice, nasal irritation and possibly perforation of the nasal septum, irritation of eyes, skin, and mucous membranes, and rarely, cirrhosis of the liver. Nausea and vomiting are infrequent. Painful ulceration of the wrist and scrotal skin, lips, and nostrils may develop with dust exposure.
    E) The primary target organs initially are the gastrointestinal tract, heart, brain, and kidneys. Eventually, the skin, bone marrow, and peripheral nervous system may be significantly damaged. The peripheral neuropathy appears similar regardless of the route of exposure.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Patients may rapidly become hypotensive. Tachycardia may develop secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic or anxiety.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) Arsenic trichloride fumes are very irritating to the eyes, and can cause photophobia, and lacrimation. Conjunctivitis, dimness of vision, and diplopia may occur. A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath. Arsenic trichloride fumes are irritating to the mucous membranes of the nose and throat and edema may result.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Irritation of the respiratory tract may occur and could result in bronchospasm, chemical pneumonitis, or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute respiratory failure was seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning. Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are possible complications. Peripheral neuropathy is common.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Severe irritation of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach may be seen. Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery ("rice-water-like") diarrhea, pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin.
    0.2.9) HEPATIC
    A) Hepatocellular damage may occur, but is not common. A common post-mortem finding is mitotic activity of hepatocytes.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria, acute tubular necrosis, renal failure, and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described. Renal tubular necrosis has been seen in dogs acutely administered sodium arsenate.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) The dysrhythmias and EKG changes noted in acute arsenic poisoning may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium.
    0.2.13) HEMATOLOGIC
    A) Hemolysis, pancytopenia, isolated leukopenia, or anemia may occur.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) The fumes are very irritating to the skin; direct dermal exposure can cause irritation and blistering.
    B) Common skin findings in systemic arsenic poisoning may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation, and exfoliative dermatitis. Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen. Shingles (Herpes Zoster) may also be a complication.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) While arsenic is likely fetotoxic in humans, data are currently inadequate to determine whether or not such effects could occur in the absence of maternal toxicity.
    B) Arsenic can cross the placenta. Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans.
    C) Fertility does not seem to be affected by arsenic in animal studies. Systemic toxicity was present before any effects were noted on the testes.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) An IARC review linked arsenic to skin cancer and a greater risk of lung cancer. OSHA has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow. Bladder, kidney, prostate, and liver cancer have also been linked with arsenic exposure.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) DILUTION
    1) ADMINISTER MILK (preferred) OR WATER (one or two glassfuls) to dilute the hydrofluoric acid in the oropharynx, esophagus and stomach. Milk provides calcium ions which will bind the fluoride ion and decrease the penetrability.
    B) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Because of the corrosive effects of hydrofluoric acid released following contact with moisture, EMESIS should NOT be induced.
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Significant esophageal or gastrointestinal tract irritation or burns may occur following ingestion. The possible benefit of early removal of some ingested material by cautious gastric lavage must be weighed against potential complications of bleeding or perforation.
    2) There may be slow absorption of ingested arsenic trichloride and lavage may be effective even after several hours.
    3) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    a) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) NASOGASTRIC SUCTION
    1) Consider nasogastric suction or lavage with a soft tube in patients with significant ingestions who present within 90 minutes of exposure and have not spontaneously vomited. Calcium gluconate 10 percent may be added to the lavage fluid.
    a) The risk of systemic fluoride toxicity from absorption of fluoride in the stomach may outweigh the risk of gastric perforation secondary to the procedure.
    E) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) As there is little risk in using activated charcoal, it is recommended until further data are available.
    2) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    F) DEMULCENTS
    1) ADMINISTER MILK OF MAGNESIA after oral dilution with milk or water, for its soothing effect.
    G) EVALUATE BURNS
    1) Observe patients with ingestion carefully for the possible development of esophageal or gastrointestinal tract irritation or burns. If signs or symptoms of esophageal irritation or burns are present, consider endoscopy to determine the extent of injury.
    H) MONITORING PATIENT
    1) Monitor liver, renal and cardiac functions. Maintain high urine output.
    I) ALKALINIZATION OF THE URINE - May prevent deposition of
    1) red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in the renal tubules.
    J) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    1) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    2) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    K) Chelation therapy may be indicated at a urine arsenic level of 200 mcg/liter or higher. Dimercaprol (BAL), D-PENICILLAMINE and DMSA are effective arsenic chelators.
    1) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose and frequency used depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Dose dependent side effects may occur.
    2) D-PENICILLAMINE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day; adults may require larger doses (ie, up to 2 grams/day).
    3) DMSA - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug. It has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    4) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    5) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter.
    L) A MOBILIZATION TEST - has been suggested to aid the diagnosis of mild or chronic exposure. Its usefulness has been questioned because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic. Refer to TREATMENT/INHALATION EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    M) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    N) HEMODIALYSIS - should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure.
    O) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    P) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring, obtain an ECG, and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders. Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Because arsenic can cause torsades de pointes and QTc prolongation, amiodarone should only be used with extreme caution. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    Q) TORSADES DE POINTES
    1) Treat with magnesium; atrial overdrive pacing may also be necessary. Correct electrolyte abnormalities.
    R) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.
    S) X-RAY: Arsenic is radiopaque. Obtain abdominal film and repeat as necessary to insure that gastric emptying maneuvers have been effective.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    C) If bronchospasm and wheezing occur, consider treatment with inhaled sympathomimetic agents.
    D) Alkalinization of the urine may prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in renal tubular cells.
    1) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    a) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    b) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    E) Chelation therapy may be indicated at a urine arsenic level of 200 mcg/liter or higher. Dimercaprol (BAL), D-PENICILLAMINE and DMSA are effective arsenic chelators.
    1) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose and frequency used depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Dose dependent side effects may occur.
    2) D-PENICILLAMINE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day, adults may require larger doses (ie, up to 2 grams/day).
    3) DMSA - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug. It has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    4) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is not presently recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    5) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter.
    F) A MOBILIZATION TEST - has been suggested to aid the diagnosis of mild or chronic exposure. Its usefulness has been questioned because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic. Refer to TREATMENT/INHALATION EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    G) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    H) HEMODIALYSIS - should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure.
    I) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    B) No cases of systemic arsenic poisoning following only eye exposure have been reported.
    C) If significant eye irritation is present, prolonged initial flushing and early ophthalmologic consultation are advisable.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    2) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids or antihistamines.
    3) Treatment of CHEMICAL BURNS may be required. Refer to TREATMENT/DERMAL EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    4) Alkalinization of the urine may prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in renal tubular cells.
    a) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    1) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    2) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    5) Chelation therapy may be indicated at a urine arsenic level of 200 mcg/liter or higher. Dimercaprol (BAL), D-PENICILLAMINE and DMSA are effective arsenic chelators.
    a) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose and frequency used depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Dose dependent side effects may occur.
    b) D-PENICILLAMINE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day, adults may require larger doses (ie, up to 2 grams/day).
    c) DMSA - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug. It has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    d) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    e) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter.
    6) A MOBILIZATION TEST - has been suggested to aid the diagnosis of mild or chronic exposure. Its usefulness has been questioned because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic. Refer to TREATMENT/DERMAL EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    7) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    8) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    9) HEMODIALYSIS - should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure.
    10) Restriction from further exposure may be necessary for workers with significant arsenical dermatitis, ulcerations, or dermatoses.
    11) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) In experimental animals, a 5-minute inhalation exposure to 40,000 ppm results in death from laryngeal spasm. One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child. An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal.
    B) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity. Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from 1 milligram to 10 grams.
    C) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate). However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) Arsenic trichloride is a colorless or yellow oily liquid with an unpleasant, acrid odor which fumes in air. On contact with water or when heated to decomposition, arsenic and hydrochloric acid are released. The fumes are very irritating to the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes.
    1) Ingestion can cause severe irritation of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach. Laryngeal or tracheal edema may occur and compromise the airway. Severe esophageal erosions may be seen in ingestions. Direct dermal exposure can cause irritation and blistering. Following inhalation, ingestion, or dermal exposure, arsenic is absorbed systemically and arsenic poisoning results.
    B) Arsenic trichloride is mutagenic in bacteria, hamster embryo cells, and human leukocytes.
    C) Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces symptoms within 30 to 60 minutes, but onset may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. A metallic or garlic taste, vomiting, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and profuse watery (rice-water-like) and sometimes bloody diarrhea may occur. Dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are common. Hypovolemia from capillary leaking ("third spacing" of fluids) is a common early event.
    D) Systemic arsenic poisoning from occupational exposure is uncommon. Arsenic workers have developed a hoarse voice, nasal irritation and possibly perforation of the nasal septum, irritation of eyes, skin, and mucous membranes, and rarely, cirrhosis of the liver. Nausea and vomiting are infrequent. Painful ulceration of the wrist and scrotal skin, lips, and nostrils may develop with dust exposure.
    E) The primary target organs initially are the gastrointestinal tract, heart, brain, and kidneys. Eventually, the skin, bone marrow, and peripheral nervous system may be significantly damaged. The peripheral neuropathy appears similar regardless of the route of exposure.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Patients may rapidly become hypotensive. Tachycardia may develop secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic or anxiety.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPOTENSION - Patients may rapidly become hypotensive after acute arsenic poisoning from "third spacing" of fluids, diarrhea, or blood loss into the GI tract (Schoolmeester & White, 1980).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) TACHYCARDIA - Patients may become tachycardic secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic, or anxiety (Morgan, 1989).

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) Arsenic trichloride fumes are very irritating to the eyes, and can cause photophobia, and lacrimation. Conjunctivitis, dimness of vision, and diplopia may occur. A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath. Arsenic trichloride fumes are irritating to the mucous membranes of the nose and throat and edema may result.
    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) ALOPECIA - Hair loss may occur with chronic exposure (Finkel, 1983; ITI, 1995).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IRRITATION - Arsenic trichloride fumes are very irritating to the eyes, and can cause photophobia and lacrimation (AAR, 1998; (Sax & Lewis, 1987; CHRIS , 2000; EPA, 1985; Grant, 1993).
    B) CONJUNCTIVITIS - Photophobia, dimness of vision, diplopia, and lacrimation may occur following arsenic exposure (Heyman et al, 1956; Grant, 1993).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) IRRITATION - Arsenic trichloride fumes are irritating to the mucous membranes of the nose and throat (AAR, 1998; (HSDB , 2000; EPA, 1985).
    B) BURNING - A sensation of burning, dryness and constriction of the oral and nasal cavities may occur (Finkel, 1983; Hathaway et al, 1996). Perforation of the nasal septum may result from irritation (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) EDEMA - Laryngeal or tracheal edema may occur and compromise the airway (Delepine, 1923).
    B) IRRITATION - Arsenic trichloride fumes are irritating to the mucous membranes of the nose and throat (AAR, 1998; (HSDB , 2000; EPA, 1985).
    C) BREATH - A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath (Morgan, 1993).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) Particularly ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion (Peterson & Rumack, 1977; Goldsmith, 1980; St Peter et al, 1970).
    a) These dysrhythmias may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium (Sittig, 1991).
    B) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) ECG changes have included QT prolongation, left axis deviation, peaked T waves, and also deeply inverted T waves (Gousios & Adelson, 1959; Heyman et al, 1956).
    a) These ECG changes may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium (Sittig, 1991), although a direct, reversible effect on the myocardium has been postulated from animal experiments (Massmann & Opitz, 1954).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Irritation of the respiratory tract may occur and could result in bronchospasm, chemical pneumonitis, or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Acute respiratory failure was seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning. Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) EDEMA OF LARYNX
    1) Laryngeal or tracheal edema may occur and compromise the airway (Delepine, 1923).
    B) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Inhalation of arsenic trichloride fumes can cause irritation of the respiratory tract, and could result in bronchospasm, chemical pneumonitis, or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, as well as systemic arsenic poisoning (EPA, 1985; Sax & Lewis, 1987; AAR, 1987).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Either noncardiogenic from capillary leaking, or cardiogenic from myocardial depression, may occur and be life-threatening (Morgan, 1989).
    D) APNEA
    1) Acute respiratory failure, presumably from severe weakness of respiratory muscles, has been seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning (Greenberg et al, 1979). The condition progressed despite dimercaprol therapy and required ventilatory assistance for one month.
    E) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are possible complications. Peripheral neuropathy is common.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are complications of acute arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966).
    a) The encephalopathy may be permanent and result in cortical atrophy one to six months after exposure. Early institution of chelation therapy may not be successful in preventing arsenic encephalopathy (Fincher & Koerker, 1987).
    B) SECONDARY PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
    1) Peripheral neuropathy is common after acute arsenic poisoning. After acute exposure, it commonly begins one to 3 weeks later (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977; Heyman et al, 1956). It usually begins as paresthesias of the soles of the feet, then the hands, progressing proximally over the next few days (Heyman et al, 1956).
    2) Severe muscle weakness and wasting then develops, causing severe disability (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977). It may initially be confused with Guillain-Barre syndrome (Donofrio et al, 1987). The paresthesias may be painful and are frequently described as severe burning pain in a stocking and glove distribution (Harbison, 1998).
    3) PHYSICAL FINDINGS of arsenic neuropathy usually include prominently decreased sensation to touch, pinprick, and temperature, frequently in a stocking and glove distribution (Heyman et al, 1956). Loss of vibration sense is also common. Profound muscle weakness and wasting, distal more so than proximal, is also seen (Donofrio et al, 1987; Heyman et al, 1956). Wrist drop, foot drop, and fasciculations may be seen (Heyman et al, 1956).
    4) ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC STUDIES of arsenic neuropathy have shown a reduction of motor conduction velocity and marked abnormalities of sensory nerve action potentials (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    5) NERVE BIOPSY may demonstrate various stages of axonal degeneration without demyelination (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977) or with demyelination (Donofrio et al, 1987).
    6) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) does not seem to be able to reverse arsenic neuropathy (Donofrio et al, 1987; Heyman et al, 1956; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977); recovery is usually very slow and incomplete. However, it has been claimed that if BAL is administered within hours of ingestion, neuropathy may be prevented (Jenkins, 1966), although this may not always be true (Marcus, 1987).
    a) Early and prolonged chelation therapy with BAL followed by d-penicillamine did not prevent development of a mild peripheral neuropathy in a patient who injected sodium arsenite and potassium cyanide intravenously in a suicide attempt (DiNapoli et al, 1989).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Severe irritation of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach may be seen. Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery ("rice-water-like") diarrhea, pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROINTESTINAL IRRITATION
    1) Ingestion can cause severe irritation of the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach (CHRIS , 2000; EPA, 1985).
    B) GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) Severe esophageal erosions may be seen in ingestions (HSDB , 2000).
    C) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery diarrhea (sometimes described as "rice-water-like") (Gilman et al, 1985; Hathaway et al, 1996; Harbison, 1998), pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin (HSDB , 2000; Sittig, 1991).

Hepatic

    3.9.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hepatocellular damage may occur, but is not common. A common post-mortem finding is mitotic activity of hepatocytes.
    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) Hepatocellular damage may occur after acute arsenic poisoning, but is not common (Donofrio et al, 1987). Mitotic activity of hepatocytes may be a common post-mortem finding in arsenic poisoning (Mackell et al, 1985).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria, acute tubular necrosis, renal failure, and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described. Renal tubular necrosis has been seen in dogs acutely administered sodium arsenate.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980), acute tubular necrosis, renal failure (Giberson et al, 1976; Vaziri et al, 1980), and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described (Gerhardt et al, 1978).

Hematologic

    3.13.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hemolysis, pancytopenia, isolated leukopenia, or anemia may occur.
    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) Hemolysis may occur after acute arsenic poisoning (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    B) PANCYTOPENIA
    1) After either acute or chronic arsenic exposure, pancytopenia may be seen (Kyle & Pease, 1965; Kjeldsberg & Ward, 1972). However, isolated leukopenia or anemia may also be seen. The anemia is usually normochromic and normocytic, but may be hypochromic and microcytic (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    2) Bone marrow aspirate may demonstrate pronounced erythroid hyperplasia similar to that seen with pernicious anemia (Selzer & Ancel, 1983). Basophilic stippling and rouleau formation of red cells may also be seen (Kyle & Pease, 1965).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) The fumes are very irritating to the skin; direct dermal exposure can cause irritation and blistering.
    B) Common skin findings in systemic arsenic poisoning may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation, and exfoliative dermatitis. Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen. Shingles (Herpes Zoster) may also be a complication.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN IRRITATION
    1) The fumes are very irritating to the skin (AAR, 1987; Sax & Lewis, 1987; EPA, 1985; Grant, 1986; Sittig, 1991).
    B) BULLOUS ERUPTION
    1) Direct dermal exposure can cause irritation and blistering (EPA, 1985).
    C) POISONING
    1) Following inhalation, ingestion, or dermal exposure, arsenic is absorbed systemically and arsenic poisoning may occur (EPA, 1985; HSDB , 2000; Delepine, 1923).
    D) DERMATITIS
    1) Common skin findings after either acute or chronic arsenic poisoning may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation (Heyman et al, 1956), and exfoliative dermatitis (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Hutton & Christians, 1983).
    E) MEE'S LINE
    1) Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen after acute exposure. Mee's lines commonly take 5 weeks to appear above the cuticle and advance 1 mm per week afterwards, allowing an approximation of the time of acute exposure (Heyman et al, 1956).
    F) HERPES ZOSTER
    1) Shingles may also be a complication of arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966; HSDB , 2000).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) While arsenic is likely fetotoxic in humans, data are currently inadequate to determine whether or not such effects could occur in the absence of maternal toxicity.
    B) Arsenic can cross the placenta. Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans.
    C) Fertility does not seem to be affected by arsenic in animal studies. Systemic toxicity was present before any effects were noted on the testes.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) HUMANS
    1) There is little evidence supporting the teratogenic potential of arsenic compounds in humans (Schardein, 1993). While arsenic is likely fetotoxic in humans, data are currently inadequate to determine whether or not such effects could occur in the absence of maternal toxicity (Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985).
    2) One study revealed increased rates of spontaneous abortion and decreased birth weights of offspring in women living close to a smelter in Sweden that emitted arsenic, lead, and sulfur dioxide. In this study, there was no increased incidence of congenital malformations (Schardein, 1993).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Sodium arsenite has caused teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in the offspring of pregnant mice, rats, and hamsters when administered orally or parenterally (Schardein, 1993; Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985; Hood, 1972; Baxley et al, 1981). In some hamster experiments, no teratogenic effects were noted (Schardein, 1993; Hood & Harrison, 1982).
    2) The route of arsenic administration proved to have a significant influence on teratogenic effects in mice. An oral dose three times that of the intraperitoneal dose was required to induce the same fetal effects (HSDB , 2000).
    3) At doses of 10 or 12 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally to mice on days 7 through 12 of gestation, sodium arsenite caused increased fetal deaths, decreased fetal weights, and developmental abnormalities including exencephaly, micrognathia, open eyes, tail abnormalities, fused ribs, and fused or missing vertebral ossification centers (Hood, 1972).
    4) High doses of intravenous or intraperitoneal arsenic produced teratogenic effects including exencephaly, genitourinary system defects, and skeletal defects in hamsters, rats, and mice (Proctor et al, 1988; Hathaway et al, 1996; HSDB , 2000). At lower doses in drinking water, only minimal fetal effects have been seen (Proctor et al, 1988; Hathaway et al, 1996).
    5) In a cultured mouse embryo system sodium arsenate and arsenite were both teratogenic, resulting in abnormalities of cranial closure, abnormalities of the eye and optic nerve, and pharyngeal arch defects. The ED50 for arsenate was about threefold higher than that for arsenite (Tabocova et al, 1996)
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) HUMANS
    1) NEONATAL DEATH - Acute ingestion of arsenic in a female with a 30 week pregnancy has been reported to result in the death of the infant born 4 days after the poisoning (Lugo et al, 1969). The child apparently died of hyaline membrane disease, but did have elevated tissue levels of arsenic. It seems apparent that arsenic can cross the placenta.
    2) Six women developing arsenical encephalopathy during the fourth to eighth months of pregnancy delivered normal children (Schardein, 1993).
    3) In studies of a population in Argentina exposed to environmental arsenic (drinking water arsenic approximately 200 mcg/L), cord blood concentrations (median 9 mcg/L) were almost as high as maternal blood concentrations (median 11 mcg/L). Essentially all of the blood arsenic and about 90 percent of the urinary arsenic in both mothers and newborns was in the form of dimethylarsinic acid in comparison to 70 percent in the urine of non-pregnant women, suggesting that the methylation of arsenic may be up-regulated during pregnancy (Concha et al, 1998).
    4) Increased rates of spontaneous abortions and decreased birth weights in the offspring were found in a study of women living near a smelter in Sweden which emitted lead, sulfur dioxide, and arsenic. There was no increased incidence of congenital malformations in this group (Schardein, 1993). The significance of this study to pure chronic arsenic exposure during pregnancy is unclear.
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) There is evidence that some arsenic compounds cross the placenta in mammals (HSDB , 2000; Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans (HSDB , 2000; Barlow & Sullivan, 1982). Nursing infants exposed to arsenic in milk may encounter problems in later brain development (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Continuous dietary administration of up to 215 mg/kg of arsenic did not have adverse effects on fertility in female rats (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7784-34-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) An IARC review linked arsenic to skin cancer and a greater risk of lung cancer. OSHA has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow. Bladder, kidney, prostate, and liver cancer have also been linked with arsenic exposure.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) The EPA and IARC have classified inorganic arsenical compounds as Class A carcinogens based on sufficient human epidemiological evidence (EPA, 1988; Hathaway et al, 1996; HSDB , 2000). Although arsenic compounds are well-established as human carcinogens, few animal studies show such effects (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    a) An IARC review found that there is a causal relationship between medicinal, drinking water, or occupational heavy arsenic exposure and skin cancer. There is also a clearly increased risk of lung cancer in workers inhaling high levels of arsenic trioxide (IARC, 1973). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow (Anon, 1979).
    2) Chronic arsenic poisoning from arsenic trichloride produces cancerous skin changes, and an increased risk of lung cancer (Morgan, 1993; Lewis, 1996; Baselt, 2000; HSDB , 2000).
    3) There is consistent evidence linking excesses of respiratory cancers to occupational arsenic exposure (ACGIH, 1996). In occupational settings, lung cancer mortality has been related to intensity rather than duration of exposure to arsenic. In a large cohort study of workers involved in the production and use of arsenical pesticides, those workers with the highest estimated exposure levels had a ninefold increase in respiratory cancer mortality (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    4) Nonworker populations living near emission sources of arsenic to air may also have increases in lung cancer, but studies to date have not been definitive (HSDB , 2000).
    5) In additional, environmental exposure studies in various regions where arsenic exposure is endemic, recent epidemiologic studies have suggested possible relationships of arsenic exposure to cancers of the lung (Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1998; Smith et al, 1998), kidney (Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1998), and bladder (Smith et al, 1998; Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1996).
    6) Bone structure and lung cancers are the two primary sites observed as a result of arsenic exposure. Although tumors of the lung and face also predominate, other cancer sites include the scrotum, buttocks, abdomen, clavicle and lower chest (HSDB , 2000).
    7) A study of a population in Taiwan drinking high-arsenic concentration artesian well water found a dose-response relationship between the amount of arsenic in the water and the incidence of mortality from skin, lung, kidney, liver, prostate, and bladder cancers (HSDB , 2000) ACGIH, 1996; (Chen et al, 1988; Hathaway et al, 1996).
    8) One theory suggests that arsenic compounds are not direct carcinogens, but act instead as indirect, gene-inducing carcinogens that activate oncogenic virus in humans (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    9) SKIN CARCINOMA - Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin have been described after both acute (Renwick et al, 1981) and chronic (Jackson & Grainge, 1975; Wagner et al, 1979; HSDB , 2000) arsenic exposure. Two patients with arsenic-induced basal cell carcinomas of the skin also developed malignancies of other organs (breast and colon) (Jackson & Grainge, 1975).
    10) Skin cancer in humans is causally associated with exposure to inorganic arsenic compounds in drinking water, the occupational environment, and drugs (Sittig, 1991; Hathaway et al, 1996). Three distinct skin cancers, Bowen's disease, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma, have been associated with chronic exposure. These carcinomas are thought to develop secondary to arsenical keratoses, which manifest as small, cornlike lesions that are benign but may become precancerous (Harbison, 1998) Raffle, 1994).
    11) HEPATIC CARCINOMA - One worker who was exposed to arsenious oxide and sodium arsenite for 20 years developed cirrhosis of the liver and primary liver carcinoma (Finkel, 1983).

Genotoxicity

    A) Arsenic trichloride appears to be mutagenic.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) An arsenic blood level below 7 mcg/100 mL is considered in the normal range. Blood levels are highly variable and may be useful only after acute exposure to confirm the diagnosis; they may become undetectable following acute poisoning at times when urinary arsenic excretion remains substantial (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    2) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    3) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    4) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    5) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) 24-hour urine collections for total arsenic excretion or spot specimens measured as concentration of arsenic (in micrograms or milligrams) per gram of urinary creatinine are generally the preferred samples, as they balance out the effects of varying urine volume and concentration.
    2) A method for a quick urine spot test (Reinsch test) has been described (Grande et al, 1987) but its clinical utility is uncertain. Even with chelation, an unexposed individual should not have more than 100 mcg of arsenic per 24 hour total urine output. Urinary arsenic may be elevated up to 200 to 1700 mcg/L within 4 hours after eating some seafoods (Baselt, 2000; Baselt, 1988; Proctor et al, 1988).
    a) Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure (Proctor et al, 1988).
    b) Urine levels are generally below 100 mcg/gram of creatinine, and generally below 20 mcg/gram of creatinine in unexposed individuals (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) HAIR
    a) Arsenic has been found in hair and nails within hours after exposure (Lander et al, 1965). Normal concentration of arsenic in hair and nails is less than 1 mcg/gram (Baselt, 2000).
    1) However, many commercial laboratories performing hair analyses for consumers have not been shown to yield consistent and reliable results (Barrett, 1985), and such levels cannot be interpreted in individual patients. Hair or nail analysis is only useful in epidemiologic studies to distinguish potentially exposed from unexposed groups.

Radiographic Studies

    A) ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
    1) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected (Hilfer & Mendel, 1962; Gousios & Adelson, 1959).
    B) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Monitor the chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    2) In ingestions, release of hydrochloric acid may result in esophageal burns.
    a) Esophagrams in the acute and subacute phase demonstrate edema, hemorrhage, ulcerations, atony, and dilation. Strictures of the esophagus were present in the chronic phase. These radiographic findings are not different from those found in alkaline corrosive esophagitis (Muhletaler, 1980).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."

Oral Exposure

    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) DILUTION
    1) ADMINISTER MILK (preferred) OR WATER (one or two glassfuls) to dilute the hydrofluoric acid in the oropharynx, esophagus, and stomach. Milk provides calcium ions which will bind the fluoride ion and decrease the penetrability.
    B) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Because of the corrosive effects of hydrofluoric acid released following contact with moisture, EMESIS should NOT be induced.
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Significant esophageal or gastrointestinal tract irritation or burns may occur following ingestion. The possible benefit of early removal of some ingested material by cautious gastric lavage must be weighed against potential complications of bleeding or perforation.
    2) There may be slow absorption and lavage may be effective even after several hours.
    3) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    4) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    5) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    6) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    7) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) There are no reports of activated charcoal being used; however, as there is little risk in using activated charcoal, it is recommended until further data are available.
    2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    E) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION (WBI)
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Hypotension from acute arsenic ingestion is likely due to intravascular volume depletion from vomiting, diarrhea, or third spacing of fluids.
    2) The initial treatment should consist of adequate volume replacement with crystalloid or blood products. Placing the patient in Trendelenburg and using MAST trousers may also be useful.
    3) Aggressive monitoring of volume status should be undertaken even in the absence of hypotension initially. Bladder catheterization to monitor hourly urine output, a central venous catheter, or a Swan-Ganz catheter should be used as clinically warranted.
    4) Pressors should be used only if volume replacement does not reverse the hypotension.
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    B) TACHYCARDIA
    1) Tachycardia may be a response to hypovolemia and should be treated initially with fluid replacement as clinically warranted.
    C) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY
    a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    2) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/INDICATIONS
    1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek et al, 2010).
    b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    3) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    D) TORSADES DE POINTES
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Withdraw the causative agent. Hemodynamically unstable patients with Torsades de pointes (TdP) require electrical cardioversion. Emergent treatment with magnesium (first-line agent) or atrial overdrive pacing is indicated. Detect and correct underlying electrolyte abnormalities (ie, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia). Correct hypoxia, if present (Drew et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010; Keren et al, 1981; Smith & Gallagher, 1980).
    b) Polymorphic VT associated with acquired long QT syndrome may be treated with IV magnesium. Overdrive pacing or isoproterenol may be successful in terminating TdP, particularly when accompanied by bradycardia or if TdP appears to be precipitated by pauses in rhythm (Neumar et al, 2010). In patients with polymorphic VT with a normal QT interval, magnesium is unlikely to be effective (Link et al, 2015).
    2) MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    a) Magnesium is recommended (first-line agent) for the prevention and treatment of drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) even if the serum magnesium concentration is normal. QTc intervals greater than 500 milliseconds after a potential drug overdose may correlate with the development of TdP (Charlton et al, 2010; Drew et al, 2010). ADULT DOSE: No clearly established guidelines exist; an optimal dosing regimen has not been established. Administer 1 to 2 grams diluted in 10 milliliters D5W IV/IO over 15 minutes (Neumar et al, 2010). Followed if needed by a second 2 gram bolus and an infusion of 0.5 to 1 gram (4 to 8 mEq) per hour in patients not responding to the initial bolus or with recurrence of dysrhythmias (American Heart Association, 2005; Perticone et al, 1997). Rate of infusion may be increased if dysrhythmias recur. For persistent refractory dysrhythmias, a continuous infusion of up to 3 to 10 milligrams/minute in adults may be given (Charlton et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 25 to 50 milligrams/kilogram diluted to 10 milligrams/milliliter for intravenous infusion over 5 to 15 minutes up to 2 g (Charlton et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Use with caution in patients with renal insufficiency.
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: High doses may cause hypotension, respiratory depression, and CNS toxicity (Neumar et al, 2010). Toxicity may be observed at magnesium levels of 3.5 to 4.0 mEq/L or greater (Charlton et al, 2010).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respiratory rate, motor strength, deep tendon reflexes, serum magnesium, phosphorus, and calcium concentrations (Prod Info magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, 2009).
    3) OVERDRIVE PACING
    a) Institute electrical overdrive pacing at a rate of 130 to 150 beats per minute, and decrease as tolerated. Rates of 100 to 120 beats per minute may terminate torsades (American Heart Association, 2005). Pacing can be used to suppress self-limited runs of TdP that may progress to unstable or refractory TdP, or for override refractory, persistent TdP before the potential development of ventricular fibrillation (Charlton et al, 2010). In a case series overdrive pacing was successful in terminating TdP associated with bradycardia and drug-induced QT prolongation (Neumar et al, 2010).
    4) POTASSIUM REPLETION
    a) Potassium supplementation, even if serum potassium is normal, has been recommended by many experts (Charlton et al, 2010; American Heart Association, 2005). Supplementation to supratherapeutic potassium concentrations of 4.5 to 5 mmol/L has been suggested, although there is little evidence to determine the optimal range in dysrhythmia (Drew et al, 2010; Charlton et al, 2010).
    5) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) Isoproterenol has been successful in aborting torsades de pointes that was resistant to magnesium therapy in a patient in whom transvenous overdrive pacing was not an option (Charlton et al, 2010) and has been successfully used to treat torsades de pointes associated with bradycardia and drug induced QT prolongation (Keren et al, 1981; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol may have a limited role in pharmacologic overdrive pacing in select patients with drug-induced torsades de pointes and acquired long QT syndrome (Charlton et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol should be avoided in patients with polymorphic VT associated with familial long QT syndrome (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) DOSE: ADULT: 2 to 10 micrograms/minute via a continuous monitored intravenous infusion; titrate to heart rate and rhythm response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Correct hypovolemia before using; contraindicated in patients with acute cardiac ischemia (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    1) Contraindicated in patients with preexisting dysrhythmias; tachycardia or heart block due to digitalis toxicity; ventricular dysrhythmias that require inotropic therapy; and angina. Use with caution in patients with coronary insufficiency (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: Tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmias, palpitations, hypotension or hypertension, nervousness, headache, dizziness, and dyspnea (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respirations and central venous pressure to guide volume replacement (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    6) OTHER DRUGS
    a) Mexiletine, verapamil, propranolol, and labetalol have also been used to treat TdP, but results have been inconsistent (Khan & Gowda, 2004).
    7) AVOID
    a) Avoid class Ia antidysrhythmics (eg, quinidine, disopyramide, procainamide, aprindine), class Ic (eg, flecainide, encainide, propafenone) and most class III antidysrhythmics (eg, N-acetylprocainamide, sotalol) since they may further prolong the QT interval and have been associated with TdP.
    E) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    F) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) Begin chelation therapy in symptomatic patients. The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been recommended as 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) THERAPEUTIC ENDPOINT
    a) Repeat courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter (Goldfrank et al, 1986; AMA, 1986). Observation for return of symptoms is strongly recommended.
    3) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure:
    1) BASELINE COLLECTION - A 24-hour urine collection for baseline arsenic excretion (Normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) CHELATED COLLECTION - Following the baseline 24-hour collection, a second 24-hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Other chelators have been used in similar tests.
    3) INTERPRETATION - Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5 day course of D-penicillamine or another chelator. 24-hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended.
    b) SEAFOOD - During the mobilization test the patient should avoid seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989).
    c) SPOT SAMPLES - For diagnostic purposes, a spot urine arsenic, blood arsenic (normal less than 7 micrograms/deciliter), pubic hair arsenic (normal less than 1 microgram/gram), and nail arsenic (normal less than 1.7 micrograms/gram) may be helpful, but results must be carefully interpreted.
    G) DIMERCAPROL
    1) Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects.
    2) DOSE: The dose used is dependent on the severity of the patient's symptoms and the urinary arsenic levels.
    a) DIMERCAPROL/BAL IN OIL: INDICATIONS: Used for the treatment of mercury (inorganic and elemental), arsenic, and gold poisoning. It is also used in combination with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection to treat patients with severe lead poisoning (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Dimercaprol is contraindicated in methyl mercury poisoning (Howland, 2002; Clarkson, 1990).
    b) MILD ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 2.5 mg/kg 4 times daily for 2 days, 2 times on the third day, and once daily thereafter for 10 days. SEVERE ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 3 mg/kg every 4 hours for 2 days, 4 times on the third day, then twice daily thereafter for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    c) MERCURY POISONING: DOSE: 5 mg/kg initially, then 2.5 mg/kg 1 or 2 times daily for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    d) ACUTE LEAD ENCEPHALOPATHY: DOSE: 4 mg/kg is given alone in the first dose and thereafter at 4-hour intervals with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection administered at a separate site. For less severe poisoning, dimercaprol dose can be decreased to 3 mg/kg after the first dose. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only. Continue the treatment for 2 to 7 days depending on clinical response (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Therapy is generally switched to a less toxic oral chelator as soon as tolerated.
    e) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Common effects include pain at the injection site and fever (especially in children). Other effects include hypertension, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, headache, burning sensations of the mouth and throat, a sensation of constriction in the throat, chest, or hands, conjunctivitis, lacrimation, salivation, tingling of the extremities, diaphoresis, abdominal pain, and anxiety. Dimercaprol injection contains peanut oil. Avoid in patients with peanut allergy (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Adverse effects are dose related; they develop in 1% of patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, 14% of patients receiving 4 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours and 65% of patients receiving 5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours (Eagle & Magnuson, 1946).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: It is generally contraindicated in patients with hepatic insufficiency, with the exception of postarsenical jaundice (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). May cause hemolysis in G6PD deficient patients. BAL metal chelate disassociates in acid environment; urinary alkalinization is usually recommended. Do not administer with iron therapy as BAL iron complex may cause vomiting (Howland, 2002).
    3) EFFICACY
    a) CHILDREN: BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948). It has also been reported to effect complete recovery in a woman and her 20-week fetus after an acute ingestion of inorganic arsenic by the mother (Daya et al, 1989).
    b) ANIMALS: BAL has been shown to reduce the organ deposition of arsenic in a rabbit model using subcutaneous injections of Lewisite at the LD10 and LD40 and 4 doses of BAL of 35 mg/kg each (Snider et al, 1990).
    H) PENICILLAMINE
    1) DOSE: The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses may be required in adults.
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity, but this has not been reported when the drug is used short term for heavy metal chelation.
    3) EFFICACY
    a) CHILDREN
    1) D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977; Kuruvilla et al, 1975; Watson et al, 1981).
    b) ANIMAL DATA
    1) In an experimental animal model, mice and guinea pigs were injected subcutaneously with 8.4 milligrams/kilogram arsenic trioxide and 30 minutes later 0.7 millimole/kilogram (104.5 milligrams/kilogram) of d-penicillamine was administered. D-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in this model (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    c) DISADVANTAGES - It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex.
    d) It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    I) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY
    a) SUMMARY: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA, Succimer), is currently approved for the treatment of childhood lead poisoning. It appears to be an effective chelator of arsenic in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978) Hannemann et al, 1995) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988).
    1) DMSA has been shown to have a safety ratio of 20 times greater than BAL. The total dosage of BAL is limited by its intrinsic toxicity, and the greater safety ratio of DMSA allows for longer and more prolonged dosing of DMSA (Inns & Rice, 1993).
    2) In a double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenical disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1400 mg/day for one week followed by 1050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    b) DOSE: The recommended initial dose is 10 milligrams/kilogram or 350 milligrams/square meter every 8 hours for 5 days, followed by 10 milligrams/kilogram every 12 hours for 14 days (Prod Info, 1991).
    c) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) During clinical trials in children the following adverse reactions were reported (Prod Info, 1991):
    1) Transient LFT increase: 6 to 10%
    2) Mucosal vesicular eruptions: 1 case
    3) Rash, pruritus: 2.6%
    4) Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea: 12%
    5) Drowsiness, paresthesia: 1%
    6) Sore throat, rhinorrhea: 3.7%
    7) Thrombocytosis, eosinophilia: 0.5%
    2) Succimer has a sulfurous odor that may be evident in the patients' breath and urine (Prod Info, 1991a).
    d) CASE REPORT - In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal excretion of arsenic increased 1.5 fold (Fournier et al, 1988).
    e) DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    f) An intravenous preparation of DMSA was used to treat a 26-year-old man with multi organsystem failure after acute trivalent arsenic overdose (Hantson et al, 1995).
    1) A solution was prepared with 1.6 grams of DMSA diluted in 50 milliliters of sterile water and titrated with 10N NaOH to pH 7.2 to 7.4 and filtered through a 0.22 micron filter. The solution was administered in 500 milliliters of 0.9% saline solution as an infusion over 1 hour at a dose of 20 milligram/kilogram/day for 5 days followed by 10 milligram/kilogram/day. The DMSA solution was also given via peritoneal dialysis, 20 milligrams/liter of dialysate with 12 liters exchanged daily for 5 days.
    J) UNITHIOL
    1) EFFICACY
    a) SUMMARY: 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulphonic acid (DMPS) is used in Europe as a chelating agent for heavy metal poisonings. It appears to be an effective chelator of arsenic in experimental animals (Inns et al, 1990; Kreppel et al, 1990; Aposhian et al, 1984; Hsu et al, 1983; Aposhian et al, 1981) and man (Goebel et al, 1990; Kew et al, 1993).
    b) DOSE: DMPS has been given to adults in a dosage of 100 mg orally three times daily for 3 weeks (Kew et al, 1993) and up to 9 months (Goebel et al, 1990).
    K) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of mice poisoned with sodium arsenite (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, and so may become the only chelator which can be given intravenously for acute arsenic poisoning.
    2) METHYL GROUP DONORS - Sulfo-adenosyl-L-methionine (Samyr(R), Bio-research, Milan) has been proposed as an agent which may promote methylation and subsequent urinary elimination of arsenic (Mahieu et al, 1987).
    L) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    M) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) IMMUNOTHERAPY - Use of immunotherapy for the treatment of sodium arsenite toxicity is being investigated in animal models. Leikin et al (1991) demonstrated a protective effect of anti-arsenic reactive serum female balb/c mice. Applicability of immunotherapy to treatment of human poisonings has not been determined.
    2) 2,3-DITHIOERYTHRITOL - Is a synthesized derivative of BAL. Preliminary laboratory evidence indicates that it is less toxic than BAL or DMSA (Boyd et al, 1989).
    N) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) MELARSOPROL ENCEPHALOPATHY - Only 4 percent of those patients given corticosteroids (prednisolone, not more than 40 milligrams daily) developed melarsoprol encephalopathy compared to approximately 33 percent in those patients receiving no steroids in a prospective randomized trial involving 600 patients with parasitology-confirmed Trypanosoma brucei gambiense infections (Pepin et al, 1989).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Respiratory tract irritation, if severe, can progress to noncardiogenic pulmonary edema which may be delayed in onset up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) There are no controlled studies indicating that early administration of corticosteroids can prevent the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients with inhalation exposure to respiratory irritant substances, and long-term use may cause adverse effects (Boysen & Modell, 1989).
    a) However, based on anecdotal experience, some clinicians do recommend early administration of corticosteroids (such as methylprednisolone 1 gram intravenously as a single dose) in an attempt to prevent the later development of pulmonary edema.
    1) Anecdotal experience with dimethyl sulfate inhalation showed possible benefit of methylprednisolone in the TREATMENT of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema (Ip et al, 1989).
    3) Anecdotal experience also indicated that systemic corticosteroids may have possible efficacy in the TREATMENT of drug-induced noncardiogenic pulmonary edema (Zitnik & Cooper, 1990; Stentoft, 1990; Chudnofsky & Otten, 1989) or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema developing after cardiopulmonary bypass (Maggart & Stewart, 1987).
    4) It is not clear from the published literature that administration of systemic corticosteroids early following inhalation exposure to respiratory irritant substances can PREVENT the development of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. The decision to administer or withhold corticosteroids in this setting must currently be made on clinical grounds.
    B) BRONCHOSPASM
    1) If bronchospasm and wheezing occur, consider treatment with inhaled sympathomimetic agents.
    2) In rabbits, isoproterenol and aminophylline significantly reduced the increased pulmonary artery pressure, vascular permeability, and fluid-flux associated with hydrochloric acid lung injury (Mizus et al, 1985).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    D) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    E) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been said to be 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure, although some authorities doubt its usefulness because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic:
    1) Collect a 24 hour urine for baseline arsenic excretion (normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) Following the baseline 24 hour collection, a second 24 hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours, of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Cannot be given to patients allergic to penicillin.
    3) Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5 day course of D-penicillamine. 24 hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended. When urine arsenic falls below 50 micrograms/24 hours, chelation may be terminated. Observation for return of symptoms and a repeat of the mobilization test 1 to 2 weeks following initial therapy are strongly recommended.
    b) During the mobilization test, the patient should avoid eating seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    c) In epidemiologic studies, blood arsenic, pubic hair arsenic, and nail arsenic may be helpful to define potentially exposed versus unexposed populations, but such results cannot be interpreted in individual patients.
    F) DIMERCAPROL
    1) EFFICACY - Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator, but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects. BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Typical side effects which are dose related include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    3) DOSE - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose used is dependent on the severity of symptoms and urinary arsenic levels.
    G) PENICILLAMINE
    1) EFFICACY - D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977) Kuravilla et al, 1975; (Watson et al, 1981). It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex. It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity; these effects have not been reported when the drug is used for short-term heavy metal chelation (Gilman et al, 1985).
    3) DOSE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses (i.e., up to 2 grams/day) may be required in adults.
    4) In an experimental animal model, d-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in trivalent arsenic-poisoned mice and guinea pigs (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    H) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug which appears to be a very effective arsenic chelator in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988). In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long-term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal arsenic excretion increased 1.5 fold (Fournier et al, 1988). DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    2) In a double-blind, randomized crossover, placebo controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenical disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1400 mg/day for one week followed by 1050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    I) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) EFFICACY - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of sodium arsenite in mice (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, but has not been studied for this indication in humans and cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    2) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter (Goldfrank et al, 1986; AMA, 1986).
    J) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    2) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    K) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976). Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980). This may be greater than renal clearance in the presence of oliguria or renal failure.
    2) Hemodialysis was instituted 4-hours postadmission in a 30-year-old male who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing 1.5 percent arsenous oxide (equivalent to 2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic), although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988). Additional studies are needed to evaluate this regimen for safety and efficacy before it can be routinely recommended (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    L) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    M) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION
    1) SYSTEMIC TOXICITY - No cases of systemic arsenic poisoning following only eye exposure have been reported.
    2) CONSULTATION - If significant eye irritation is present, prolonged initial flushing and early ophthalmologic consultation are advisable.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids or antihistamines.
    B) BURN
    1) APPLICATION
    a) These recommendations apply to patients with MINOR chemical burns (FIRST DEGREE; SECOND DEGREE: less than 15% body surface area in adults; less than 10% body surface area in children; THIRD DEGREE: less than 2% body surface area). Consultation with a clinician experienced in burn therapy or a burn unit should be obtained if larger area or more severe burns are present. Neutralizing agents should NOT be used.
    2) DEBRIDEMENT
    a) After initial flushing with large volumes of water to remove any residual chemical material, clean wounds with a mild disinfectant soap and water.
    b) DEVITALIZED SKIN: Loose, nonviable tissue should be removed by gentle cleansing with surgical soap or formal skin debridement (Moylan, 1980; Haynes, 1981). Intravenous analgesia may be required (Roberts, 1988).
    c) BLISTERS: Removal and debridement of closed blisters is controversial. Current consensus is that intact blisters prevent pain and dehydration, promote healing, and allow motion; therefore, blisters should be left intact until they rupture spontaneously or healing is well underway, unless they are extremely large or inhibit motion (Roberts, 1988; Carvajal & Stewart, 1987).
    3) TREATMENT
    a) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS: Prophylactic topical antibiotic therapy with silver sulfadiazine is recommended for all burns except superficial partial thickness (first-degree) burns (Roberts, 1988). For first-degree burns bacitracin may be used, but effectiveness is not documented (Roberts, 1988).
    b) SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS: Systemic antibiotics are generally not indicated unless infection is present or the burn involves the hands, feet, or perineum.
    c) WOUND DRESSING:
    1) Depending on the site and area, the burn may be treated open (face, ears, or perineum) or covered with sterile nonstick porous gauze. The gauze dressing should be fluffy and thick enough to absorb all drainage.
    2) Alternatively, a petrolatum fine-mesh gauze dressing may be used alone on partial-thickness burns.
    d) DRESSING CHANGES:
    1) Daily dressing changes are indicated if a burn cream is used; changes every 3 to 4 days are adequate with a dry dressing.
    2) If dressing changes are to be done at home, the patient or caregiver should be instructed in proper techniques and given sufficient dressings and other necessary supplies.
    e) Analgesics such as acetaminophen with codeine may be used for pain relief if needed.
    4) TETANUS PROPHYLAXIS
    a) The patient's tetanus immunization status should be determined. Tetanus toxoid 0.5 milliliter intramuscularly or other indicated tetanus prophylaxis should be administered if required.
    C) SKIN ABSORPTION
    1) Systemic arsenic poisoning can occur following dermal exposure to arsenic trichloride (Delepine, 1923; HSDB , 1991).
    D) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    E) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been said to be 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure, although some authorities doubt its usefulness because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic:
    1) Collect a 24 hour urine for baseline arsenic excretion (normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) Following the baseline 24 hour collection, a second 24 hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours, of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Cannot be given to patients allergic to penicillin.
    3) Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5 day course of D-penicillamine. 24 hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended. When urine arsenic falls below 50 micrograms/24 hours, chelation may be terminated. Observation for return of symptoms and a repeat of the mobilization test 1 to 2 weeks following initial therapy are strongly recommended.
    b) During the mobilization test, the patient should avoid eating seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    c) In epidemiologic studies, blood arsenic, pubic hair arsenic, and nail arsenic may be helpful to define potentially exposed versus unexposed populations, but such results cannot be interpreted in individual patients.
    F) DIMERCAPROL
    1) EFFICACY - Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator, but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects. BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Typical side effects which are dose related include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    3) DOSE - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose used is dependent on the severity of symptoms and urinary arsenic levels.
    G) PENICILLAMINE
    1) EFFICACY - D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977) Kuravilla et al, 1975; (Watson et al, 1981). It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex. It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity; these effects have not been reported when the drug is used for short-term heavy metal chelation (Gilman et al, 1985).
    3) DOSE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses (ie, up to 2 grams/day) may be required in adults.
    4) In an experimental animal model, d-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in trivalent arsenic-poisoned mice and guinea pigs (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    H) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug which appears to be a very effective arsenic chelator in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988). In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long-term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal arsenic excretion increased 1.5 fold (Fournier et al, 1988). DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively nontoxic.
    2) In a double-blind, randomized crossover, placebo controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenical disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1400 mg/day for one week followed by 1050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    I) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) EFFICACY - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of sodium arsenite in mice (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, but has not been studied for this indication in humans and cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    J) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    2) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    K) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    L) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976). Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980). This may be greater than renal clearance in the presence of oliguria or renal failure.
    2) Hemodialysis was instituted 4-hours postadmission in a 30-year-old man who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing 1.5 percent arsenous oxide (equivalent to 2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic), although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988). Additional studies are needed to evaluate this regimen for safety and efficacy before it can be routinely recommended (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    M) SKIN ULCER
    1) SKIN ULCERATION - Workers with significant arsenical dermatitis, ulcerations, or dermatoses may be overexposed and may need to be precluded from further exposure.
    N) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    O) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976).
    2) Mathieu et al (1992) report the effect of hemodialysis and dimercaprol on arsenic kinetics following an ingestion of 10 grams of sodium arsenate (40 to 50 percent arsenic). During the 15 days of hospitalization, 235 milligrams of arsenic was eliminated in the urine.
    a) Instantaneous hemodialysis clearance was 85 +/- 75 milliliters/minute without previous BAL and 87.5 +/- 75 milliliters/minute with a previous 250 milligram BAL injection.
    b) BAL 250 milligrams was given one time only at approximately 20 hours postingestion.
    c) One month after discharge the patient was admitted to another hospital for a sensory and motor polyneuritis involving both upper and lower limbs. Arsenic concentrations in blood and urine were not detectable, however, BAL was administered for 8 days at this institution. All neurologic signs resolved over 3 months.
    3) Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980).
    4) Additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hemodialysis in the treatment of arsenic poisoning in the absence of renal insufficiency before it can be routinely recommended.
    a) Hemodialysis was instituted 4 hours postadmission in a 30-year-old male who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing arsenous oxide 1.5 percent (approximately 2,150 milligrams of metallic arsenic) although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988).

Summary

    A) In experimental animals, a 5-minute inhalation exposure to 40,000 ppm results in death from laryngeal spasm. One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child. An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal.
    B) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity. Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from 1 milligram to 10 grams.
    C) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate). However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INHALATION - In experimental animals, a 5 minute inhalation exposure to 40,000 ppm of arsenic trichloride results in death from laryngeal spasm (Delepine, 1923).
    2) DERMAL - Following direct dermal exposure with the liquid, tissue necrosis progresses rapidly with systemic arsenic absorption and poisoning (Delepine, 1923).
    3) ORAL - One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child (Woody & Komentani, 1948).
    a) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980).
    b) An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal (Finkel, 1983).
    4) FATAL DOSE - The fatal human dose is 70 to 180 mg depending on the weight of the victim (EPA, 1985).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from one milligram to 10 grams.
    2) Arsenic trioxide in a solubilized form becomes sodium arsenite, which is more toxic than in an un-solubilized form.
    a) Two hundred milligrams of arsenic trioxide ingestion by an adult may be lethal (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    b) Acute ingestion of 9 to 14 milligrams of arsenic trioxide by a 16-month-old child produced classic gastrointestinal signs and symptoms of arsenic poisoning (Watson et al, 1981).
    c) A 30-year-old man survived an ingestion of 6 ounces of "Blue Ball Rat Killer" containing 1.5% arsenous oxide (2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic per 6 ounces) with aggressive therapy (fluid resuscitation, chelation and hemodialysis) (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    3) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate) (Morgan, 1989).
    a) Significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans.
    b) Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vitro to trivalent arsenic.

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7784-34-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7784-34-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7784-34-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS7784-34-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: RTECS, 2000 EPA, 1985
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 48 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (SKIN)RAT:
    a) 80 mg/kg

Physical Characteristics

    A) Arsenic trichloride is a colorless to light yellow oily liquid with an acrid odor. On contact with moisture arsenic trichloride becomes acidic (EPA, 1985; HSDB , 2000).

Molecular Weight

    A) 181.28 (Budavari, 1996)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1987, pp 64.
    14) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 5th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1986, pp 37-38.
    15) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    16) AMA: American Medical Association: Drugs used in the treatment of poisoning, in: AMA Drug Evaluations, 6th ed, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1986, pp 1641-1643.
    17) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    18) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    19) Anon: Health hazards of inorganic arsenic, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, 1979.
    20) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    21) Barlow SM & Sullivan FM: Arsenic and its compounds, in: Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals, Academic Press, London, UK, 1982, pp 62-82.
    22) Barrett S: Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?. JAMA 1985; 254:1041-1045.
    23) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 3rd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, IL, 1989, pp 65-69.
    24) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, PSG Publishing Company, Littleton, MA, 1988, pp 28-34.
    25) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    26) Baxley MN, Hood RD, & Vedel GC: Prenatal toxicity of orally administered sodium arsenite in mice. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1981; 26:749-756.
    27) Boysen PG & Modell JH: Pulmonary edema, in: Textbook of Critical Care Medicine, 2nd ed. Shoemaker WC, Ayres S, Grenvik A et al (Eds), WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1989, pp 515-518.
    28) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    29) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 11th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1989, pp 127.
    30) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1996.
    31) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    32) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    33) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires October/31/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    34) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    35) Carvajal HF & Stewart CE: Emergency management of burn patients: the first few hours. Emerg Med Reports 1987; 8:129-136.
    36) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    37) Charlton NP , Lawrence DT , Brady WJ , et al: Termination of drug-induced torsades de pointes with overdrive pacing. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28(1):95-102.
    38) Chen CJ, Chiou HY, & Chiang MH: Dose-response relationship between ischemic heart disease mortality and long-term arsenic exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996; 16:504-510.
    39) Chen CJ, Kuo TL, & Wu MM: Arsenic and cancers (Letter). Lancet 1988; 1:414-415.
    40) Chudnofsky CR & Otten EJ: Acute pulmonary toxicity to nitrofurantoin. J Emerg Med 1989; 7:15-19.
    41) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    42) Clarkson TW: Mercury - an element of mystery (editorial). N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1137-1138.
    43) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Toxicology 4th ed, 2C, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    44) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2A, Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981, pp 1517-1528.
    45) Concha G, Vogler G, & Lezcano D: Exposure to inorganic arsenic metabolites during early human development. Toxicol Sci 1998; 44:185-190.
    46) Council on Scientific Affairs: Effects of Toxic Chemicals on the Reproductive System, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1985.
    47) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    48) Daya MR, Irwin R, & Parshley MC: Arsenic ingestion in pregnancy (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:347.
    49) Delepine S: Observations upon the effects of exposure to arsenic trichloride upon health. J Ind Hyg 1923; 4:346-464.
    50) DiNapoli J, Hall AH, & Drake R: Cyanide and arsenic poisoning by intravenous injection. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:308-311.
    51) Donofrio PD, Wilbourn AJ, & Albers JW: Acute arsenic intoxication presenting as Guillain-Barre-like syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1987; 10:114-120.
    52) Drew BJ, Ackerman MJ, Funk M, et al: Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(9):934-947.
    53) EPA: 40 CFR 302; CERCLA Hazardous Substances List; Reportable Quantities. 54 FR 3388, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1989.
    54) EPA: EPA chemical profile on arsenous trichloride, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1985.
    55) EPA: Pesticide Fact Handbook, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1988.
    56) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    57) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    58) Eagle H & Magnuson HJ: The systemic treatment of 227 cases of arsenic poisoning (encephalitis, dermatitis, blood dyscrasia, jaundice, fever) with 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). Am J Syph Gonor Ven Dis 1946; 30:420-441.
    59) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    60) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    61) Fesmire FM, Schauben JL, & Roberge RJ: Survival following massive arsenic ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:602-606.
    62) Fincher RME & Koerker RM: Long-term survival in acute arsenic encephalopathy. Follow-up using newer measures of electrophysiologic parameters. Am J Med 1987; 82:549-552.
    63) Finkel AJ: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wright, PSG Inc, Boston, MA, 1983, pp 17-24.
    64) Ford MD: Arsenic, in: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (Eds), Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 6th ed, Appleton & Lange, Stanford, CT, 1998, pp 1261-1273.
    65) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.
    66) Freeman JW & Couch JR: Prolonged encephalopathy with arsenic poisoning. Neurology 1978; 28:853-855.
    67) Gerhardsson L, Dahlgren E, & Eriksson A: Fatal arsenic poisoning -- a case report. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14:130-133.
    68) Gerhardt RE, Hudson JB, & Rao RN: Chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis induced by arsenic poisoning. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:1267-1269.
    69) Giberson A, Vaziri ND, & Mirahamadi K: Hemodialysis of acute arsenic intoxication with transient renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136:1303-1304.
    70) Gilman AG, Goodman LS, & Rall TW: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th ed, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1985, pp 1614-1617.
    71) Goldfrank LR, Howland MA, & Kirstein RH: Heavy Metals, in Golfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 3rd ed, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT, 1986, pp 609-618.
    72) Goldsmith S: Arsenic-induced atypical ventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:1096-1098.
    73) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    74) Gousios AG & Adelson L: Electrocardiographic and radiographic findings in acute arsenic poisoning. Am J Med 1959; 659-663.
    75) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    76) Grande GA, Rogers AA, & Ling LJ: Urine spot test as guide to treatment in acute pentavalent arsenic ingestion. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:73-74.
    77) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 115-119.
    78) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    79) Graziano JH, Cuccia D, & Friedheim E: The pharmacology of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid and its potential use in arsenic poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 207:1051-1055.
    80) Greenberg C, Davies S, & McGowan T: Acute respiratory failure following severe arsenic poisoning. Chest 1979; 76:596-598.
    81) Guha Mazumder DN, Ghoshal UC, & Saha J: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic-contaminated subsoil water. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:683-690.
    82) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    83) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires October/31/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    84) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    85) Harbison RM: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    86) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    87) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    88) Haynes BW Jr: Emergency department management of minor burns. Top Emerg Med 1981; 3:35-40.
    89) Hernandez-Zavala A, Del Razo LM, & Aguilar C: Alteration in bilirubin excretion in individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Toxicol Lett 1998; 99:79-84.
    90) Heyman A, Pfeiffer JB Jr, & Willett RW: Peripheral neuropathy caused by arsenical intoxication. A study of 41 cases with observations on the effects of BAL (2,3-dimercapto-propanol). N Engl J Med 1956; 254:401-409.
    91) Hilfer RJ & Mendel A: Acute arsenic intoxication diagnosed by roentgenograms. Report of a case with survival. N Engl J Med 1962; 266:663-664.
    92) Hood RD & Harrison WP: Effects of prenatal arsenite exposure in the hamster. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1982; 29:671-678.
    93) Hood RD: Effects of sodium arsenite on fetal development. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1972; 7:216-222.
    94) Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, & Fuchs A: Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiology 1996; 7:117-124.
    95) Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, & Smith AH: Lung and kidney cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Cordoba, Argentina. Int J Epidmiol 1998; 27:561-569.
    96) Howland MA: Dimercaprol (BAL), in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    97) Hutton JT & Christians BL: Sources, symptoms, and signs of arsenic poisoning. J Fam Pract 1983; 17:423-426.
    98) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    99) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    100) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    101) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    102) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    103) IARC: Arsenic and Inorganic Arsenic Compounds, in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, Vol 2., Some inorganic and organometallic compounds, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1973, pp 48-73.
    104) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    105) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    106) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1988, pp 51-52.
    107) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    108) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    109) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    110) Ip M, Wong K-L, & Wong K-F: Lung injury in dimethyl sulfate poisoning. J Occup Med 1989; 31:141-143.
    111) Jackson R & Grainge JW: Arsenic and cancer. Canad Med Assoc J 1975; 113:396-401.
    112) Jenkins RB: Inorganic arsenic and the nervous system. Brain 1966; 89:479-498.
    113) Keren A, Tzivoni D, & Gavish D: Etiology, warning signs and therapy of torsade de pointes: a study of 10 patients. Circulation 1981; 64:1167-1174.
    114) Kersjes MP, Maurer JR, & Trestrail JH: An analysis of arsenic exposures referred to the Blodgett Regional Poison Center. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:75-78.
    115) Khan IA & Gowda RM: Novel therapeutics for treatment of long-QT syndrome and torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol 2004; 95(1):1-6.
    116) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    117) Kjeldsberg & Ward: Leukemia in arsenic poisoning. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:935.
    118) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    119) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    120) Kosnett MJ & Becker CE: Dimercaptosuccinic acid as a treatment for arsenic poisoning. (Abstract, Presented at the AACT/AAPCC/ABMT/CAPCC Annual Scientific Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 1987.
    121) Kreppel H, Reichl FX, & Forth W: Lack of effectiveness of D-penicillamine in experimental arsenic poisoning. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:1-5.
    122) Kuruvilla A, Bergeson PS, & Done AK: Arsenic poisoning in childhood. An unusual case report with special notes on therapy with penicillamine. Clin Toxicol 1975; 8:535-540.
    123) Kyle RA & Pease GL: Hematologic aspects of arsenic intoxication. N Engl J Med 1965; 273:18-23.
    124) Lander H, Hodge PR, & Crisp CS: Arsenic in the hair and nails. Its significance in acute arsenical poisoning. J Forens Med 1965; 12:52-67.
    125) Le Quesne PM & McLeod JG: Peripheral neuropathy following a single exposure to arsenic. Clinical course in four patients with electrophysiological and histological studies. J Neurol Sci 1977; 32:437-451.
    126) Lenz K, Hruby K, & Druml W: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in human arsenic poisoning. Arch Toxicol 1981; 47:241-243.
    127) Lewis DR, Southwick JW, & Ouellet-Hellstrom R: Drinking water arsenic in Utah: A cohort mortality study. Environ Health Prospect 1999; 107:359-365.
    128) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    129) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 1997.
    130) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    131) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    132) Lugo, Cassaty, & Palmisano: Acute maternal arsenic intoxication. Am J Dis Child 1969; 117:328.
    133) Mackell MA, Poklis A, & Gantner GE: An unsuspected arsenic poisoning murder disclosed by forensic autopsy. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1985; 6:358-361.
    134) Maggart M & Stewart S: The mechanisms and management of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema following cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43:231-236.
    135) Marcus SM: Survival after massive arsenic trioxide ingestion (Abstract), AACT/AAPCC/ABMT/CAPCC Annual Scientific Meeting, Vancouver, BC, 1987.
    136) Massmann VW & Opitz H: Experimental investigations of EKG changes with chronic arsenic poisoning. Zeitschrift fur Kreislaufforschung 1954; 48:704-713.
    137) Mizus I, Summer W, & Farrukh I: Isoproterenol or aminophylline attenuate pulmonary edema after acid lung injury. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985; 131:256-259.
    138) Morgan DP: Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 4th ed, Global Professional Publications, Englewood, CO, 1993.
    139) Morgan DP: Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 4th ed. EPA-540/9-88-0015, US Environmental Protection Agency, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1989, pp 54-62.
    140) Moylan JA: Burn care after thermal injury. Top Emerg Med 1980; 2:39-52.
    141) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide on Hazardous Materials, 10th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Boston, MA, 1990.
    142) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    143) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    144) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    145) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    146) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    147) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    148) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    223) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    224) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    225) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    226) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    227) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    228) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    229) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    230) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    231) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    232) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    233) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    234) Perticone F, Ceravolo R, & Cuccurullo O: Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in acquired long QT syndrome. Clin Drug Inverst 1997; 13:229-236.
    235) Peterson RG & Rumack BH: D-penicillamine therapy of acute arsenic poisoning. J Pediatr 1977; 91:661.
    236) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    237) Proctor NH, Hughes JP, & Fischman ML: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 2nd ed, JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1988, pp 80-82.
    238) Product Information: BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, dimercaprol intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per manufacurer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    239) Product Information: Cordarone(R) oral tablets, amiodarone HCl oral tablets. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc (per FDA), Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
    240) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    241) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    242) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    243) Product Information: magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2009.
    244) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    245) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    246) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires October/31/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    247) Rahman M, Tondel M, & Ahmad SA: Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:198-203.
    248) Rahman M, Tondel M, & Ahmad SA: Hypertension and arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Hypertension 1999; 33:74-78.
    249) Rahman M, Wingren G, & Axelson O: Diabetes mellitus among Swedish art glass workers--an effect of arsenic exposure?. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996; 22:146-149.
    250) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    251) Renwick JH, Harrington JM, & Waldron HA: Long-term effects of acute arsenical poisoning. J Soc Occup Med 1981; 31:144-147.
    252) Roberts JR: Minor burns (Pt II). Emerg Med Ambulatory Care News 1988; 10:4-5.
    253) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1987, pp 99.
    254) Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY, 1993.
    255) Schoolmeester WL & White DR: Arsenic poisoning. South Med J 1980; 73:198-208.
    256) Selzer PM & Ancel MA: Chronic arsenic poisoning masquerading as pernicious anemia. West J Med 1983; 139:219-220.
    257) Shum S, Skarbovig J, & Habersang R: Acute lethal arsenite poisoning in mice: effect of treatment with N-acetylcysteine, D-penicillamine and dimercaprol on survival time. Vet Human Toxicol 1981; 23(Suppl 1):39-42.
    258) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985, pp 86-90.
    259) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    260) Smith AH, Goyolea M, & Haque R: Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of Northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147:660-669.
    261) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    262) Smith WM & Gallagher JJ: "Les torsades de pointes": an unusual ventricular arrhythmia. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:578-584.
    263) Snider TH, Wientjes MG, & Joiner RL: Arsenic distribution in rabbits after lewisite administration and treatment with British anti-lewisite (BAL). Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990; 14:262-272.
    264) St Peter J, Gross C, & Victoria BE: Ventricular fibrillation caused by arsenic poisoning. Am J Dis Child 1970; 120:367-371.
    265) Stentoft J: The toxicity of cytarabine. Drug Saf 1990; 5:7-27.
    266) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    267) Tabocova S, Hunter ES 3rd, & Gladen BC: Developmental toxicity of inorganic arsenic in whole embryo: culture oxidation state, dose, time, and gestational age dependence. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1996; 138:298-307.
    268) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    269) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    270) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    271) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    272) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    273) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    274) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    275) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    276) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    277) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    278) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    279) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    280) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    281) Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, et al: Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    282) Vaziri ND, Upham T, & Barton CH: Hemodialysis clearance of arsenic. Clin Toxicol 1980; 17:451-456.
    283) Wagner SL & Weswig P: Arsenic in blood and urine of forest workers as indices of exposure to cacodylic acid. Arch Environ Health 1974; 28:77-79.
    284) Wagner SL, Maliner JS, & Morton WE: Skin cancer and arsenical intoxication from well water. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115:1205-1207.
    285) Watson WA, Veltri JC, & Metcalf TJ: Acute arsenic exposure treated with oral D-penicillamine. Vet Human Toxicol 1981; 23:164-166.
    286) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    287) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    288) Woody NC & Kometani JT: BAL in the treatment of arsenic ingestion of children. Pediatr 1948; 1:372-378.
    289) Zaloga GP, Deal J, & Spurling T: Case report: unusual manifestations of arsenic intoxication. Am J Med Sci 1970; 289:210-214.
    290) Zitnik RJ & Cooper JA: Pulmonary disease due to antirheumatic agents. Clin Chest Med 1990; 11:139-150.
    291) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.