MOBILE VIEW  | 

ARSENIC

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Arsenic compounds are frequently used as pesticides, but are also found in a variety of occupations and as environmental contaminants. ELEMENTAL: Arsenic is rarely found in its isolated elemental form. More commonly, it is present in mineral species, in alloys, or as an oxide or other compound form. INORGANIC: As3+ (trivalent or arsenite) and As5+ (pentavalent or arsenate). METALLOID: Arsenic is a silver-gray or tin-white, shiny, brittle, crystalline and metallic-looking element. It can exist in three allotropic forms: yellow (alpha), black (beta), and gray (gamma). ORGANIC: Melarsoprol (trypanocidal), parasitic therapy (veterinary), seafood (arsenobetaine).
    B) GASEOUS: This management does NOT include recommendations for patients with ARSINE GAS exposure; refer to the document on ARSINE for more information.

Specific Substances

    1) Arsenate
    2) Arsenia
    3) Arsenicals
    4) Arsen (German,Polish)
    5) Arsenic Black
    6) Arsenic, Metallic
    7) Arsenic, Solid
    8) Arsenic-75
    9) Arsenik
    10) Arsenic Acid, Calcium Salt
    11) Arsenic Metal
    12) Arsenic Oxide (Pentoxide)
    13) Arsenic Oxide (Trioxide)
    14) Arsenic, White
    15) Arsenious Trichloride
    16) Arysodila
    17) Colloidal Arsenic
    18) Copper Acetoarsenite, Solid
    19) Dimethyl Arsinic Acid
    20) Dimethylarsinat Sodny (Polish)
    21) Dimethylarsinic Acid
    22) Disodium Arsenate, Heptahydrate
    23) DMAA (Cacodylic Acid)
    24) Emerald Green (Paris Green)
    25) Gray Arsenic
    26) Grey Arsenic
    27) Inorganic Arsenic
    28) Jones Ant Killer
    29) Kakodylan Dodny (Polish)
    30) Metallic Arsenic
    31) Sodium Metaarsenate
    32) Sodium Orthoarsenate
    33) Swedish Green (Paris Green)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) As

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) ELEMENTAL: Arsenic is rarely found in its isolated elemental form. More commonly, it is present in mineral species, in alloys, or as an oxide or other compound form (Budavari, 2000).
    2) INORGANIC: As3+ (trivalent or arsenite) and As5+ (pentavalent or arsenate) (Ford, 2006).
    3) GASEOUS: Refer to "ARSINE" document for more information.
    4) METALLOID: Arsenic is a silver-gray or tin-white, shiny, brittle, crystalline and metallic-looking element. It can exist in three allotropic forms: yellow (alpha), black (beta), and gray (gamma) (HSDB , 2001). The amorphous metalloid form (alpha-arsenic) will darken to black (beta-arsenic) and form arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in moist air. When arsenic vapor is cooled suddenly, a yellow type of arsenic which has no metallic properties is formed (Budavari, 2000; Hathaway et al, 1996; Lewis, 1996; NIOSH , 2001).
    5) ORGANIC: Melarsoprol (trypanocidal), parasitic therapy (veterinary), seafood (arsenobetaine) (Ford, 2006).
    6) Arsenic is available commercially in the following grades of purity: Technical, Crude (90-95%), Refined (99%) and Semiconductor (99.999%) (Lewis, 1997).
    B) SOURCES
    1) Arsenic is thought to occur throughout the universe. It is the twentieth most common element in the earth's crust, having a concentration of 1.8 ppm (Baselt, 1997; Bingham et al, 2001; Budavari, 2000; Zenz, 1994).
    2) Arsenic has been found:
    a) In a variety of Asian folk/homeopathic/herbal remedies from China, India, and Iran (Espinoza et al, 1995; Kew et al, 1993; Sheerin et al, 1994; p 5; Hall & Harruff, 1989; Kerr & Saryan, 1986).
    b) In groundwater and drinking water contamination (Endemic hydroarsenicism) in Chile, Taiwan, Mexico, Argentina, Thailand, and India (Mazumder et al, 2001; Rahman et al, 2001; Woollons & Russell-Jones, 1998).
    c) In a wine produced from grapes grown in vineyards treated with an arsenical pesticide (Houser & Vitek, 1979).
    d) In preservatives used by taxidermists (Jensen & Olsen, 1995).
    e) In opium (content as high as 74.1 mcg/100 g) (Datta, 1977).
    f) Contaminated moonshine (contains up to 415 mcg/L of arsenic) (Gerhardt et al, 1980).
    g) In art glass manufacturing (Apostoli et al, 1998).
    h) Sodium arsenic-containing ant poisons (banned by EPA) (Kuslikis et al, 1991).
    i) Seafood, especially shellfish (concentrations range from 2 mg/kg for freshwater fish up to 22 mg/kg for lobsters) (Buchet et al, 1994; Baselt, 2000).
    j) Chromium-copper-arsenate (CCA) used as a wood preservative (exposure to arsenic through airborne dust) (Jensen & Olsen, 1995; Nygren et al, 1992; Peters et al, 1984).
    C) USES
    1) Arsenic is used: in metallurgy for hardening copper, lead, and alloys; in the manufacture of certain types of glass; in pigment production; in pesticides (most often as arsenic trioxide), insecticides, fungicides, and rodenticides; in weed killer; in agriculture as a cotton desiccant; as a by-product in the smelting of copper ores; as a component of electrical devices, and as a dopant material in semiconductor manufacture (Bingham et al, 2001; Budavari, 2000; Hathaway et al, 1996; HSDB , 2001; Lewis, 1998; Zenz, 1994).
    2) ORGANIC: Organic arsenic (melarsoprol) is used to treat the meningoencephalitis stage of African Trypanosomiasis (Anon, 1993; Markell et al, 1992; Gilman et al, 1990; Pepin et al, 1992; Van Voorhis, 1990; Wellde et al, 1989).
    3) Historically, arsenic was used in a tonic known as "Fowler's solution," to treat a variety of illnesses, such as leukemia and psoriasis (Bingham et al, 2001; Harbison, 1998; Zenz, 1994).
    4) It has also been used as a radioactive tracer (an artificial isotope, As) in toxicology (HSDB , 2001).
    5) Arsenic, as arsenic sulfide, is also a component in certain types of hair removal products, known as corrosive arsenic-based depilatory agents (CABD) that have been traditionally used in Iran and India. In Iran, CABD is also referred to as "Vajebi" (Farzaneh et al, 2011).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Arsenic compounds are used as pesticides and in a variety of occupations (eg, glass/ceramic manufacturing, metallurgy, semiconductor manufacture). However, environmental contamination of groundwater accounts for the majority of modern exposures outside the United States. Organic arsenic (melarsoprol) is used to treat the meningoencephalitis stage of African Trypanosomiasis. Arsenic trioxide is used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia. Please refer to ARSENIC TRIOXIDE document for more information.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Inorganic arsenic reduces cellular apoptosis via damage of mitochondrial membranes and down-regulation of BCL2, a pro-survival protein. Arsenic is actively transported into Trypanosomes by a purine transporter resulting in inhibition of trypanothione production and subsequent parasite lysis.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Trivalent arsenic (As3+) disrupts oxidative phosphorylation, leading to free radical formation via inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which subsequently decreases gluconeogenesis due to lack of acetyl-CoA. Pentavalent arsenic may be transformed to arsenic or substitute for inorganic phosphate in glycolysis, leading to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and loss of ATP formation. Chronically, arsenic may cause DNA damage, mutation in the p-53 suppressor gene, and inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms leading to cancer. Arsenic-containing metals are considered nontoxic due to their low solubility. Organic arsenic has relatively low toxicity when compared to the inorganic trivalent and pentavalent forms.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Toxicity from arsenic is uncommon and major effects are rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ACUTE OVERDOSE: Arsenic compounds are mainly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, but some absorption may occur through intact skin or inhalation. Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces signs and symptoms within 30 minutes, but symptoms may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. Many arsenic compounds are severe irritants of the skin, eye, and mucous membranes; some may be corrosive. Contact produces local hyperemia, followed by vesicular or pustular eruptions. Trivalent compounds are particularly caustic. Acute inhalation exposures have resulted in irritation of the upper respiratory tract.
    2) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Gastrointestinal symptoms occur rapidly after acute ingestion. Initial signs and symptoms include burning lips, throat constriction, and dysphagia. Excruciating abdominal pain, severe nausea, vomiting, and profuse "rice water-like" diarrhea that may lead to hypovolemia follows these symptoms. In addition, hypovolemia from capillary leakage (third-spacing of fluids) is a common early effect. QTc prolongation may occur. Muscle cramps, facial edema, bronchitis, dyspnea, chest pain, dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are also common following significant exposures. A garlic-like odor of the breath and feces may also develop. Subacute toxicity can produce neuropathies, both motor and sensory, and can progress to a Guillain-Barre-like syndrome.
    3) SEVERE TOXICITY: Hypotension and tachycardia are common early signs of severe poisoning. Hypotension may be resistant to fluid resuscitation and multiorgan failure may ensue. Fever and tachypnea may occur. These patients can develop ventricular dysrhythmias, including torsade de pointes. Encephalopathy, seizures, and coma have been reported. Acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, rhabdomyolysis, and hepatitis may occur several days after ingestion.
    4) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Inhalation is the most common route of exposure in people who work in occupations that use arsenic. The sequence of chronic poisoning involves weakness, anorexia, hepatomegaly, jaundice, and gastrointestinal complaints, followed by conjunctivitis, irritation of the upper respiratory tract, hyperpigmentation, and eczematoid and allergic dermatitis. A hoarse voice and chronic upper respiratory septum is a common result after prolonged inhalation of white arsenic dust or fume. Peripheral nervous system symptoms may include numbness, burning, and tingling of the hands and feet; pain; paresthesias; muscle fasciculations; gross tremors; ataxia; discoloration; and mental confusion. Muscular weakness, limb tenderness, and difficulty walking may follow. The final phase consists of peripheral sensory neuropathy of the hands and feet. Associated motor neuropathy may occur as well. Certain arsenic compounds are known human carcinogens. Chronic exposure in either occupational settings or by drinking contaminated groundwater can cause poisoning and carries an increased risk of skin, lung, bladder, and possibly liver cancers.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Hypotension and tachycardia are common early signs. Fever and tachypnea may occur. Hypertension has been associated with chronic environmental arsenic exposure.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Inorganic arsenic crosses the placenta and may result in spontaneous abortion or stillbirth with either acute or chronic poisoning.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Chronic therapeutic, occupational, and environmental arsenic exposure have been associated with lung, bladder, skin, and other cancers in humans.
    B) Exposures as little as 1 gram per year have been associated with CANCER (HSDB).

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Testing must be correlated with the time of exposure and care must be taken to eliminate possible confounding factors such as food-derived arsenic (fish) or accumulated arsenic in those with chronic renal failure.
    B) Diagnosis is based on elevated urinary arsenic levels. A spot urine may be done as a screen prior to chelation but arsenic excretion is intermittent, therefore a 24-hour urine arsenic collection is necessary for definitive diagnosis. A 24-hour urinary arsenic collection exceeding 100 mcg is usually abnormal, even after chelation.
    C) Monitor CBC, serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, renal function tests, and a blood arsenic concentration in symptomatic patients.
    D) Serial ECGs should be obtained to follow the QTc interval and continuous cardiac monitoring should be instituted in symptomatic patients.
    E) Most arsenic compounds are radio-opaque, therefore abdominal X-rays may confirm acute ingestions and guide decontamination.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Fluid resuscitation should be initiated immediately, but care must be taken to recognize pulmonary and cerebral edema when present. When a significant acute ingestion is confirmed, chelation therapy should be initiated immediately prior to laboratory confirmation. This will minimize time delay to treatment associated with prolonged laboratory result turn around. In chronic toxicity, the decision to chelate must be based upon patient condition and laboratory evaluation.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Aggressive life support measures should be instituted immediately. Anti-arrhythmic medications that prolong the QTc should be avoided. In severely ill patients, combined therapy with both BAL and an oral agent should be considered. If renal failure exists, the dose of BAL should be decreased after the loading dose.
    2) INHALATION EXPOSURE: Inhalation is the most common exposure in arsenic workers. OSHA has set an "action level" of 5 mcg/m(3) of inorganic arsenic in the air over an 8-hour period. Initial treatment should be to remove the patient from the exposure and refer the patient to an occupational specialist for 24-hour urine collection. The decision to chelate will depend upon the patient's clinical status and urine arsenic concentration.
    3) DERMAL EXPOSURE: Occasionally arsenic can cause a contact dermatitis or an exfoliative rash. Wash the area thoroughly and avoid further dermal contact. Topical steroid creams may decrease inflammation in these cases.
    4) EYE EXPOSURE: Copious irrigation and ophthalmology follow-up.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Remove the contaminated clothing and wash the patient thoroughly.
    2) HOSPITAL: Activated charcoal does not bind arsenic well. Gastric lavage and whole bowel irrigation should be considered for confirmed significant ingestions.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Should be considered for patients with severe CNS depression at risk of aspiration.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) For patients with severe poisoning or a history of a large exposure, initial chelation should be with a parenteral chelator (intramuscular BAL or intravenous unithiol). When the patient is improving and able to tolerate oral medication, therapy can be switched to an oral chelator with no waiting period in between treatments. BAL is administered by deep intramuscular injection 3 to 5 mg/kg/dose IM every 4 to 6 hours. The dose and frequency depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Higher doses of BAL invariably cause adverse effects. SUCCIMER: Should be used as soon as the patient is improving and able to tolerate oral medication. DOSE: 10 mg/kg every 8 hours for 5 days, then decrease dosing to every 12 hours for 14 days. It may be more effective and causes fewer side effects than BAL. Chelation therapy should be stopped when the urinary arsenic level falls below 50 mcg per 24 hours. UNITHIOL (2,3-dimercaptopropanol-sulfonic acid, DMPS) is available in Europe and through compounding pharmacies in the United States. It is a water-soluble analog of BAL, and can be given orally or parenterally. Unithiol is dosed as follows: IV: Day one 250 mg/kg every 3 to 4 hours, day two 250 mg every 4 to 6 hours, day three 250 mg every 6 to 8 hours, day four 250 mg every 8 to 12 hours, days five and six: 250 mg every 8 to 24 hours. Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route after the fifth day: 100 to 300 mg 3 times daily. ORAL: Initially 1200 mg to 2400 mg every 24 hours divided (100 mg or 200 mg every 2 hours), reduce to 100 mg to 300 mg every 8 hours as tolerated. Patients should be treated for 14 days or until there is no arsenic detected in the urine.
    F) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring, obtain an ECG, and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders. Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Because arsenic can cause torsades de pointes and QTc prolongation, amiodarone should only be used with extreme caution. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    G) TORSADES DE POINTES
    1) Treat with magnesium; atrial overdrive pacing may also be indicated. Correct electrolyte abnormalities.
    H) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Arsenic is poorly dialyzable. Hemodialysis should only be considered for arsenic toxicity accompanied by renal failure.
    I) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) ADMISSION CRITERIA: All patients with acute arsenic toxicity should be admitted.
    2) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a medical toxicologist and/or poison center for all potentially significant arsenic exposures.
    J) PITFALLS
    1) Failure to consider arsenic poisoning in patients with prolonged gastrointestinal illness and cardiac conduction abnormalities. Failure to remove fish or other arsenic sources from the diet prior to testing urine arsenic levels.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Infectious gastroenteritis may have a similar clinical presentation, though arsenic toxicity usually lasts longer and has more multi-organ system involvement. Toxic plant and mushroom ingestion may lead to a severe gastritis though most lack the systemic toxicity seen with arsenic. Theophylline overdose may have a similar presentation though diarrhea is not as predominant a feature as it is with arsenic poisoning.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Inhalation is the most common exposure in arsenic workers. OSHA has set an "action level" of 5 mcg/m(3) of inorganic arsenic in the air over an 8-hour period. Initial treatment should be to remove the patient from the exposure and refer the patient to an occupational specialist for 24-hour urine collection. The decision to chelate will depend upon the patient's clinical status and urine arsenic concentration.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) Copious irrigation and ophthalmology follow-up.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) Occasionally arsenic can cause a contact dermatitis or an exfoliative rash. Wash the area thoroughly and avoid further dermal contact. Topical steroid creams may decrease inflammation in these cases.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic than pentavalent arsenic (arsenate). Acute ingestion of more than 100 mg of inorganic arsenic is likely to cause significant toxicity. Airborne concentrations of 5 mg As/m(3) are considered immediately dangerous to life and health.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Arsenic compounds are used as pesticides and in a variety of occupations (eg, glass/ceramic manufacturing, metallurgy, semiconductor manufacture). However, environmental contamination of groundwater accounts for the majority of modern exposures outside the United States. Organic arsenic (melarsoprol) is used to treat the meningoencephalitis stage of African Trypanosomiasis. Arsenic trioxide is used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia. Please refer to ARSENIC TRIOXIDE document for more information.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Inorganic arsenic reduces cellular apoptosis via damage of mitochondrial membranes and down-regulation of BCL2, a pro-survival protein. Arsenic is actively transported into Trypanosomes by a purine transporter resulting in inhibition of trypanothione production and subsequent parasite lysis.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Trivalent arsenic (As3+) disrupts oxidative phosphorylation, leading to free radical formation via inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which subsequently decreases gluconeogenesis due to lack of acetyl-CoA. Pentavalent arsenic may be transformed to arsenic or substitute for inorganic phosphate in glycolysis, leading to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and loss of ATP formation. Chronically, arsenic may cause DNA damage, mutation in the p-53 suppressor gene, and inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms leading to cancer. Arsenic-containing metals are considered nontoxic due to their low solubility. Organic arsenic has relatively low toxicity when compared to the inorganic trivalent and pentavalent forms.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Toxicity from arsenic is uncommon and major effects are rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ACUTE OVERDOSE: Arsenic compounds are mainly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, but some absorption may occur through intact skin or inhalation. Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces signs and symptoms within 30 minutes, but symptoms may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. Many arsenic compounds are severe irritants of the skin, eye, and mucous membranes; some may be corrosive. Contact produces local hyperemia, followed by vesicular or pustular eruptions. Trivalent compounds are particularly caustic. Acute inhalation exposures have resulted in irritation of the upper respiratory tract.
    2) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Gastrointestinal symptoms occur rapidly after acute ingestion. Initial signs and symptoms include burning lips, throat constriction, and dysphagia. Excruciating abdominal pain, severe nausea, vomiting, and profuse "rice water-like" diarrhea that may lead to hypovolemia follows these symptoms. In addition, hypovolemia from capillary leakage (third-spacing of fluids) is a common early effect. QTc prolongation may occur. Muscle cramps, facial edema, bronchitis, dyspnea, chest pain, dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are also common following significant exposures. A garlic-like odor of the breath and feces may also develop. Subacute toxicity can produce neuropathies, both motor and sensory, and can progress to a Guillain-Barre-like syndrome.
    3) SEVERE TOXICITY: Hypotension and tachycardia are common early signs of severe poisoning. Hypotension may be resistant to fluid resuscitation and multiorgan failure may ensue. Fever and tachypnea may occur. These patients can develop ventricular dysrhythmias, including torsade de pointes. Encephalopathy, seizures, and coma have been reported. Acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, rhabdomyolysis, and hepatitis may occur several days after ingestion.
    4) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Inhalation is the most common route of exposure in people who work in occupations that use arsenic. The sequence of chronic poisoning involves weakness, anorexia, hepatomegaly, jaundice, and gastrointestinal complaints, followed by conjunctivitis, irritation of the upper respiratory tract, hyperpigmentation, and eczematoid and allergic dermatitis. A hoarse voice and chronic upper respiratory septum is a common result after prolonged inhalation of white arsenic dust or fume. Peripheral nervous system symptoms may include numbness, burning, and tingling of the hands and feet; pain; paresthesias; muscle fasciculations; gross tremors; ataxia; discoloration; and mental confusion. Muscular weakness, limb tenderness, and difficulty walking may follow. The final phase consists of peripheral sensory neuropathy of the hands and feet. Associated motor neuropathy may occur as well. Certain arsenic compounds are known human carcinogens. Chronic exposure in either occupational settings or by drinking contaminated groundwater can cause poisoning and carries an increased risk of skin, lung, bladder, and possibly liver cancers.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hypotension and tachycardia are common early signs. Fever and tachypnea may occur. Hypertension has been associated with chronic environmental arsenic exposure.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) Less acute arsenic toxicity may cause subnormal body temperatures (Hayes, 1982).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPOTENSION: Patients may rapidly become hypotensive after acute arsenic poisoning from third spacing of fluids, diarrhea, or blood loss into the gastrointestinal tract (Schoolmeester & White, 1980).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) TACHYCARDIA: Patients may become tachycardic secondary to pain, hypovolemia, or cardiac effects of arsenic (Shum et al, 1995).

Heent

    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Facial edema has been observed after a 30-day IV infusion of arsenic for leukemia treatment (Tsuji et al, 2004).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) Conjunctivitis, photophobia, dimness of vision, diplopia, lacrimation, and sometimes hyperemia, chemosis, and conjunctival hemorrhage may occur (Uede & Furukawa, 2003; Grant, 1993; Heyman et al, 1956).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) A sensation of burning, dryness, and constriction of the oral and nasal cavities may occur.
    B) PERFORATION: Chronic exposure to trivalent arsenic compounds can cause perforation of the nasal septum (ACGIH, 1996a; OSHA, 1988).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath.
    B) Chronic laryngitis has been reported in India following widespread arsenic contamination in water (Rahman et al, 2001).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Ventricular tachycardia, ventricular bigeminy, and ventricular fibrillation have been described after acute arsenic ingestion (Lai et al, 2005; Brayer et al, 1997; Goldsmith, 1980; Peterson & Rumack, 1977; St Petery et al, 1970) .
    1) These dysrhythmias may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium (Sittig, 1985).
    b) QRS morphology of the ventricular dysrhythmia is often consistent with torsade de pointes (Lai et al, 2005; Beckman et al, 1991; Goldsmith, 1980; St Petery et al, 1970).
    c) Abrupt respiratory failure and asystole developed in a 21-year-old man who ingested 4 grams of arsenic (Moore et al, 1994a).
    d) CASE REPORT: Sinus tachycardia (114 bpm) was reported in a 3-year-old boy who ingested approximately 5 mL of an herbicide containing 47.6% monosodium methylarsonate (Roth et al, 2011).
    e) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients who ingested corrosive arsenic-based depilatory (CABD) agents, cardiac dysrhythmias were reported in 10% of the patients. Analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide (Farzaneh et al, 2011).
    B) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ECG changes have included QT prolongation, left axis deviations, peaked T waves, and also deeply inverted T waves (Lai et al, 2005; Gousios & Adelson, 1959; Heyman et al, 1956).
    b) Abnormal ECG changes, including ST elevation, flat T, and prolonged QT intervals, were reported in infants following consumption of dried milk powder contaminated with arsenic. Analysis of a sample of milk powder estimated the arsenic concentration to be 4 to 7 mg/L (Dakeishi et al, 2006).
    C) MYOCARDITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: Interstitial myocarditis resulting in fatal ventricular arrhythmias has been reported after chronic exposure to arsenic (Hall & Harruff, 1989).
    D) ISCHEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A study of Taiwan residents who drank artesian well water containing high amounts of arsenic found chronic arsenic exposure to be related to ischemic heart disease in a dose-dependent manner. Mortality attributed to ischemic heart disease gradually declined over 17 to 20 years following cessation of consumption of the well water (Chang et al, 2004).
    E) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension and tachycardia are common early signs (Shum et al, 1995; Schoolmeester & White, 1980).
    b) Hypotension from gastrointestinal fluid loss or myocardial depression may develop after acute ingestion (Lai et al, 2005; Moore et al, 1994a).
    c) CASE SERIES: Three patients, including a pregnant woman at 38 weeks gestation, developed hypotension (80 to 100/40 to 70 mmHg), respiratory distress, severe rash, blisters, oliguria, anuria, and leukopenia following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl solution that contained 30% arsenic instead of the prescribed 25% benzyl benzoate for treatment of scabies. Despite intensive supportive therapy, all of the patients died, including the fetus, within 72 hours post-application (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).
    d) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients who ingested corrosive arsenic-based depilatory (CABD) agents, hypotension was reported in 10% of the patients. Analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide (Farzaneh et al, 2011).
    F) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A dose-related increased incidence of hypertension was found in a Taiwanese population with chronic arsenic exposure in drinking water (Chen et al, 1995).
    b) A cross-sectional analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between arsenic exposure from drinking water and blood pressure using baseline data of 10,910 participants in the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study in Bangladesh (October 2000 to May 2002). Results suggested that the effect of low-level arsenic exposure on blood pressure is nonlinear and may be more pronounced in persons with lower intake of nutrients related to arsenic metabolism and cardiovascular health (Chen et al, 2007).
    c) A cross-sectional study involving 8790 postpartum women who were exposed to arsenic in drinking water showed that as arsenic concentrations increased from 21 to 50, 51 to 100, and greater than 100 mcg/L, systolic blood pressure also increased by 1.88 mmHg (95% CI, 1.03 to 2.73), 3.90 mmHg (95% CI, 2.52 to 5.29), and 6.84 mmHg (95% CI, 5.40 to 8.28), respectively as compared with women in the control group (drinking water arsenic concentration of 20 mcg/L or less). Diastolic blood pressure also increased with increasing drinking water arsenic concentrations, with a change of 2.10 mmHg (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.84), 2.72 mmHg (95% CI, 1.53 to 3.92), and 3.17 mmHg (95% CI, 1.92 to 4.41), respectively, as compared with women in the control group (Kwok et al, 2007).
    G) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC: Peripheral vascular function to cold stress, measured by finger systolic blood pressure before and after ice-water immersion, was significantly improved after a reduction in arsenic exposure from drinking water (Pi et al, 2005).
    H) MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A retrospective review of cases from 1950 to 2000, comparing patients from an arsenic-exposed region (region II) in Chile with a non-arsenic-exposed region (region V) in Chile showed that the mortality rates from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were significantly increased in region II during 1958 to 1970 (considered the peak exposure period, prior to installation of an arsenic removal plant), with a rate ratio (RR) in men of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.37 to 1.59) and a RR in women of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.4). From 1971 to 2000, the RR gradually decreased to a final recorded RR in men of 1.21 (95% CI, 1 to 1.47) and a RR in women of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.14). The RR for AMI, comparing region II and region V, varied according to gender and age. Within the peak exposure period of 1958 to 1970, the RR was the greatest in men and women aged 30 to 39 years, at 2.27 (95% CI, 1.61 to 3.20) and 2.51 (95% CI, 1.43 to 4.42), respectively. In comparison with lung and bladder cancer (2 prevalent cancers following arsenic exposure), excess deaths due to AMI were greater during the peak exposure period (1958 to 1970) with 452 in men and 129 deaths in women, as compared with 71 deaths in men and 19 in women for lung cancer and 17 deaths in men and 10 in women for bladder cancer (Yuan et al, 2007).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) APNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 45-year-old woman developed acute respiratory distress and multiorgan failure following an intentional ingestion of between 8 and 16 g of sodium arsenite. The patient gradually improved with dimercaprol therapy and supportive care; however, residual quadriplegia occurred (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    b) Acute respiratory failure presumably from severe weakness of respiratory muscles was reported in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning (Greenberg et al, 1979). The problem progressed despite dimercaprol therapy and required ventilatory assistance for 1 month.
    c) Breathlessness was associated with asymmetric bilateral phrenic nerve involvement secondary to arsenic poisoning from contaminated opium in a 35-year-old opium addict (Bansal et al, 1991).
    d) Abrupt respiratory failure and asystole developed in a 21-year-old man who ingested 4 grams of arsenic (Moore et al, 1994a).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pulmonary edema, either noncardiogenic from capillary leaking or cardiogenic from myocardial depression, may occur and be life-threatening.
    b) CASE REPORTS: Three patients developed respiratory distress, hypotension, and burns and blistering of the skin following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl alcohol solution containing arsenic 30% instead of the prescribed benzyl benzoate 25% for treatment of scabies. Despite intensive supportive therapy, all 3 patients continued to deteriorate clinically and subsequently died within 72 hours postapplication (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).
    c) Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported (Bollinger et al, 1992)(Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Zaloga et al, 1970).
    C) BRONCHITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute inhalation exposure may result in irritation of the upper respiratory tract (Hathaway et al, 1996; ACGIH, 1996a).
    b) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: Following chronic arsenic exposure through water contamination, asthmatic bronchitis (ie, cough, expectoration, breathlessness, restrictive asthma) has been reported in India. The causality is not well-defined (Rahman et al, 2001).
    D) INJURY OF RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chronic arsenic exposure due to ingestion of contaminated ground water was studied in 107 subjects. Twenty cases (68.9%) had an obstructive pattern of lung involvement (7 mild; 9 moderate; 4 severe), 8 cases (27.6%) had a mixed obstructive-restrictive pattern and 1 (3.5%) had only a restrictive pattern (Majumdar et al, 2004).
    E) BRONCHIECTASIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: Bronchiectasis, as identified by high-resolution computed tomography, was reported in individuals following chronic exposure to arsenic in drinking water (Mazumder et al, 2005).
    b) A retrospective study comparing the mortality rates in Antofagasta, Chile during a period of high arsenic exposure in the drinking water (1958 to 1971) with the rest of Chile found that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for bronchiectasis in patients born just before the period of exposure (1950 to 1957), and exposed during early childhood, was 12.4 (95% CI, 3.3 to 31.7). For those individuals born during the exposure period (1958 to 1970) and who were exposed in utero, the SMR was 46.2 (95% CI, 21.1 to 87.7), suggesting increased mortality in adults from bronchiectasis following chronic arsenic exposure from drinking water while in utero as compared with exposure during early childhood (Smith et al, 2006).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 3-year-old boy developed vomiting within 30 minutes of ingesting 3 Python brand "snakes" (fireworks) which contained arsenic and looked like candy. He became obtunded within 1 hour. Neurological exam was nonfocal, and pupils were 5 mm and reactive. Blood glucose was 125 mg/dL. The patient was provided supportive care and mentation began to clear within several hours. He returned to baseline within 10 hours of ingestion. No permanent sequelae was reported (Brayer et al, 1997).
    b) A 4-month-old developed vomiting within 10 minutes of ingesting arsenic. He was comatose within 6 hours of ingestion; he was unresponsive and died 36 hours after ingestion (Lai et al, 2005).
    c) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients who ingested corrosive arsenic-based depilatory (CABD) agents, an altered level of consciousness was reported in 13.5% of the patients. The consciousness levels ranged from grade I (awake, lethargic, or sleeping, but arousable) to grade IV (unresponsive to pain, flaccid paralysis, and absent brainstem reflexes and respirations). Analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide (Farzaneh et al, 2011).
    B) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are complications of significant acute (Duenas-Laita et al, 2005; Quatrehomme et al, 1992; Jenkins, 1966) and chronic (Morton & Caron, 1989; Freeman & Couch, 1978) arsenic poisoning. The encephalopathy may be permanent and result in cortical atrophy 1 to 6 months after exposure (Fincher & Koerker, 1987).
    b) PREVENTION: Early institution of chelation therapy may not be successful in preventing arsenic encephalopathy (Fincher & Koerker, 1987). However, British anti-lewisite has been reported to reverse the encephalopathy seen after chronic arsenic exposure (Beckett et al, 1986; Freeman & Couch, 1978).
    C) ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the possible influence of long-term arsenic exposure on the development of cognitive function in adolescents. Neurobehavioral tests included continuous performance test (CPT), symbol digit (SD), pattern memory (PM), and switching attention (SA). After adjusting for education and sex, pattern memory and switching attention were significantly affected by long-term arsenic exposure. The authors, however, state that the limitations of the study require replication to confirm this conclusion (Tsai et al, 2003).
    b) A follow-up study, conducted 14 years after 381 infants developed arsenic poisoning following consumption of dried milk powder contaminated with arsenic, showed that the children continued to have a variety of abnormal neurologic findings as compared with unexposed individuals of approximately the same age, including higher rates of severe mental retardation and an increase in the prevalence of epilepsy. Analysis of a sample of the dried milk determined that the arsenic concentration was 4 to 7 mg/L, with a total ingested dose of approximately 60 mg (Dakeishi et al, 2006).
    D) NEUROPATHY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A toxic polyneuropathy resulting in quadriparesis has been reported within 2 weeks of beginning use of an arsenic-containing homeopathic preparation (Chakraborti et al, 2003).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ONSET: Peripheral neuropathy is common after either acute or chronic arsenic poisoning (Duenas-Laita et al, 2005; Mukherjee et al, 2005; Tsuji et al, 2004; Nazmul Ahasan HAM, 2001; Guha Mazumder et al, 1992). After acute exposure peripheral neuropathy usually begins 1 to 3 weeks later (Hahn et al, 2000; Goebel et al, 1990; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977; Heyman et al, 1956).
    b) INITIAL SIGNS: Peripheral neuropathy usually begins as paresthesias of the soles of the feet, then the hands, progressing proximally over the next few days (Heyman et al, 1956). Severe muscle weakness and wasting then develops, causing severe disability (OSHA, 1988; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977). In a case of arsenic poisoning from burning pressure-treated wood, symptoms in an 11-year-old boy were limited to bilateral pain and tingling of the feet along with difficulty sleeping and walking secondary to the pain (Hahn et al, 2000).
    c) CASE REPORT: Paresthesias, generalized weakness, vomiting, and abdominal pain occurred in a 16-year-old girl following intentional ingestion of up to 240 mL of an herbicide containing monosodium methylarsonate 47%. The patient was administered a bolus dose of British anti-lewisite approximately 12 hours postingestion, followed by administration of Dimercaptosuccinic acid for 14 days. The patient's condition improved and she was transferred to a psychiatric institution; however, mild paresthesia in her hands and feet persisted at her 6-week follow-up (Roth et al, 2011).
    d) DIFFERENTIAL: The syndrome may initially be confused with Guillain-Barre (Kim et al, 2012; Gherardi et al, 1990; Donofrio et al, 1987a). Facial nerves are commonly involved in Guillain-Barre and almost never affected in arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966).
    e) PAIN: The paresthesias may be painful and are frequently described as severe burning pain in a stocking and glove distribution.
    f) Physical findings of arsenic neuropathy usually include prominently decreased sensation to touch, pinprick, and temperature, frequently in a stocking and glove distribution (Kelafant et al, 1993; Heyman et al, 1956); loss of vibration sense is also common; profound muscle weakness and wasting, distal more so than proximal, is also seen (Hahn et al, 2000; Donofrio et al, 1987a; Heyman et al, 1956); wrist drop, foot drop, and fasciculations may be seen (Heyman et al, 1956).
    1) Gait may be altered by toxicity resulting in high-stepping, ataxic, waddling, or hesitation due to hyperpathia following chronic exposure (Rahman et al, 2001).
    g) Electrodiagnostic studies of arsenic neuropathy have shown a reduction of motor conduction velocity and marked abnormalities of sensory nerve action potentials (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    1) Thirteen victims of arsenic toxicity with peripheral neuropathy were studied (Oh, 1991). Sensory and mixed nerve conduction was abnormal in all cases. Twelve of 13 had absent sural nerve potentials; 11 of 13 had absent median and ulnar nerve potentials. One of the cases reported suffered a steady worsening of nerve conduction until, 6 weeks later, no motor or sensory response could be found in any of the tested nerves.
    2) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A study involving adolescents who were chronically exposed to arsenic via contaminated drinking water demonstrated that cumulative arsenic exposure of greater than 100 mg resulted in a significant decrease in the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of the sural sensory action potential (SAP). The authors speculate that slow NCV of sural SAP may be an early marker for the development of peripheral neuropathy associated with chronic arsenic exposure (Tseng et al, 2006).
    3) A study of 43 arsenic exposed smelter workers found a negative correlation between estimated cumulative arsenic exposure and NCV (Lagerkvist & Zetterlund, 1994). Seven workers had NCVs below the normal range. Workers were not assessed clinically for evidence of neuropathy.
    h) Nerve biopsy may demonstrate various stages of axonal degeneration without demyelination (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977) or with demyelination (Donofrio et al, 1987a).
    i) Dimercaprol (BAL) does not seem to reverse arsenic neuropathy (Donofrio et al, 1987a; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977; Heyman et al, 1956); recovery is usually very slow and incomplete. It has been claimed that if BAL is administered within hours of ingestion, however, neuropathy may be prevented (Jenkins, 1966), although this is not true for all cases (Marcus, 1987).
    j) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man with acute arsenic neuropathy with asymmetric bilateral phrenic nerve involvement made a significant recovery with D-penicillamine (250 mg/3 times daily) therapy (Bansal et al, 1991).
    k) CASE REPORT: A patient with chronic exposure to an arsenical pesticide presented with peripheral neuropathy and macrocytosis but without anemia (Heaven et al, 1994).
    l) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman developed progressive weakness and peripheral neuropathy leading to quadriplegia and requiring mechanical ventilation following an unknown type of exposure to arsenic. Analysis of her serum and urine revealed elevated arsenic (As) concentrations (290 mcg/kg [normal less than 2 mcg/kg] and 2000 mcg/L [normal less than 10 mcg/L], respectively). The patient slowly improved clinically following chelating therapy with DMSA; however, 5 years following intoxication, the patient continued to have residual paresthesias and weakness in her hands and distal lower extremities (Stenehjem et al, 2007).
    m) CASE SERIES: In a large survey of arsenic poisoning from various water supplies in India, 37.3% (n=154 cases; total 413 subjects) of individuals developed clinical neuropathies. Of those cases, 80.5% (n=124 cases) had a sensory neuropathy and 30 cases had a motor component (Rahman et al, 2001).
    n) CASE SERIES: In a study of 137 subjects chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water, arsenic exposure was associated with elevated toe vibration threshold. Urinary arsenic and cumulative arsenic index were both significantly associated with elevated toe vibration threshold (Hafeman et al, 2005).
    o) CASE REPORTS: Numbness in all 4 extremities were reported in 3 patients (a 45-year-old woman, her 23-year-old son, and a 5-year-old child) following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl alcohol solution containing arsenic 30% instead of the prescribed benzyl benzoate 25% for treatment of scabies. The patients also experienced vomiting, pruritus, and blistering of the skin. With symptomatic and supportive therapy, all of the patients recovered and were discharged within 5 days postadmission; however, numbness of the extremities continued to persist (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).
    p) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients who ingested corrosive arsenic-based depilatory (CABD) agents, neuropathy was reported in 8.6% of the patients. Analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide (Farzaneh et al, 2011).
    q) CASE REPORT: A 74-year-old woman, with existing idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, presented to a neurology clinic with worsening of her peripheral neuropathy of her lower extremities. Prior to presentation, toxicologic analysis of her blood and urine indicated elevated concentrations of arsenic. Following a 5-day abstention of fish and shellfish, a repeat urinalysis reported elevated urine arsenic (622.1 nmol/L; reference range less than 534 nmol/L). Medication history of the patient revealed that she had been taking greater than the recommended dosages of gingko biloba, fish oil, omega-3, and glucosamine. After discontinuing all supplements, a repeat urinalysis, conducted 1 month later, showed that the arsenic concentration was 57.5 nmol/L. At five months follow-up, the patient reported improvement, with a return of sensation and recovery of some motor function (Barton & McLean, 2013).
    r) CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 5-day history of progressive quadriparesis. For 25 days prior to presentation, the patient had been taking an herbal medication to treat psoriasis. Five days after cessation of medication, he experienced bilateral arm weakness and hand paresthesia progressing to his lower extremities bilaterally. Electrodiagnostic studies indicated an acquired demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. An initial diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome was made; however, screening for heavy metals showed an elevated urinary arsenic concentration (240.7 mcg/L), suggesting arsenic-induced neuropathy, mimicking Guillain-Barre syndrome (Kim et al, 2012).
    E) CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: Among a Taiwanese population chronically exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water, there was an increased prevalence of cerebrovascular disease, particularly cerebral infarction (Chiou et al, 1997).
    F) TETRAPLEGIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman intentionally ingested between 8 and 16 g of sodium arsenite and developed multiorgan failure (ie, respiratory, renal, hepatic, and hematologic), along with neurological deterioration. During the first hospital day the patient was treated with dimercaprol (300 mg/3 times daily and increased to 200 mg every 4 hours) and received supportive care. The patient gradually improved, but permanent quadriplegia occurred (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman developed progressive weakness and peripheral neuropathy leading to quadriplegia and requiring mechanical ventilation following an unknown type of exposure to arsenic. Analysis of her serum and urine revealed elevated arsenic (As) concentrations (290 mcg/kg [normal less than 2 mcg/kg] and 2000 mcg/L [normal less than 10 mcg/L], respectively). The patient slowly improved clinically following chelating therapy with DMSA; however, 5 years following intoxication, the patient continued to have residual paresthesias and weakness in her hands and distal lower extremities (Stenehjem et al, 2007).
    G) NYSTAGMUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Upward gaze-evoked nystagmus was reported in 3 women following chronic exposure of diphenylarsinic acid, an organoarsenic compound, in the drinking water. Other neurologic signs and symptoms that developed included ataxia, myoclonus of the extremities with diffuse hyperreflexia, speech disturbances, and sleep disorders. The nystagmus spontaneously resolved following cessation of exposure to the contaminated water (Nakamagoe et al, 2006).
    H) IMPAIRED COGNITION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a cross-sectional study of 602 children (6 to 8 years of age) living within 3.5 km of a metallurgy smelter complex in the city of Torreon, Mexico, cognitive and neurobehavioral function was evaluated. Of these children, 591 had complete anthropometry, iron, and zinc status by biochemical measurements in serum, blood lead concentration (PbB), and arsenic in urine, and 557 completed several cognitive performance tests. Linear and logistic regression adjusted for hemoglobin concentration, PbB, and sociodemographic confounders showed a significant inverse association between urine arsenic concentration and Visual-Spatial Abilities with Figure Design, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the WISC-RM Digit Span subscale area, Visual Search, and Letter Sequencing Tests. It was concluded that arsenic contamination can affect children's cognitive development independent of any effect of lead (Rosado et al, 2007).
    I) DISTURBANCE IN THINKING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A decrease in intellectual function, as measured by a number of different neuropsychiatric tests including the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, the Primary Scale of Intelligence, and the Total Sentence Recall test, has been reported in children following recent exposures to arsenic in drinking water and in food (vonEhrenstein et al, 2007; Wasserman et al, 2007).
    J) AMNESIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman presented with worsening alopecia and memory loss. She also experienced diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, a erythematous rash bilaterally on her lower extremities, and onycholysis. A spot urine sample indicated an arsenic concentration of 83.6 mcg/g creatinine (normal less than 50 mcg/g creatinine). A review of the patient's medication history revealed that she had been taking kelp supplements for treatment of menopause (2 to 4 tablets/day for 1 year). Analysis of a kelp supplement sample showed an arsenic concentration of 8.5 mg/kg. Discontinuation of the supplements resulted in complete resolution of her symptoms. A repeat spot urine sample, obtained 2 months after the first urine sample, revealed an arsenic level of 25 mcg/L (normal 0 to 50 mcg/L) (Amster et al, 2007).
    K) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 5-year-old child experienced itching, severe erythema, blisters, vomiting, fever, and seizures following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl solution that contained arsenic 30% instead of the prescribed benzyl benzoate 25% for treatment of scabies. With symptomatic and supportive therapy, the patient recovered and was discharged 4 days postadmission (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Early symptoms within hours following significant exposure to arsenic include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery diarrhea (sometimes described as "rice water-like") (Cox & Orledge, 2011; Roth et al, 2011; Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007; Lai et al, 2005; Tsuji et al, 2004; Bartolome et al, 1999; Brayer et al, 1997; Moore et al, 1994a; Quatrehomme et al, 1992), pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin. A sensation of burning and dryness of the oral and nasal cavities may occur.
    b) Stool or emesis may have a garlic-like odor (Lee et al, 1995).
    c) Hematemesis may develop with severe poisoning (Lai et al, 2005).
    d) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients who ingested corrosive arsenic-based depilatory (CABD) agents, gastric pain, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea were reported in 64.5%, 27%, and 20% of the patients, respectively. Analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide (Farzaneh et al, 2011).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatocellular injury may occur after severe acute arsenic poisoning but is not common (Lai et al, 2005; ACGIH, 1991; Donofrio et al, 1987a). Mitotic activity of hepatocytes may be a common postmortem finding of arsenic poisoning (Mackell et al, 1985).
    1) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman developed toxic hepatitis with coagulopathy and multiorgan failure following an intentional ingestion of between 8 and 16 g of sodium arsenite. The patient gradually improved with dimercaprol therapy and supportive care; however, permanent neurological damage occurred (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    b) Hepatomegaly was reported in 61 infants who ingested dried milk powder contaminated with arsenic (Dakeishi et al, 2006).
    c) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    1) Hepatocellular damage after chronic arsenic exposure may be more common than after acute; autopsy data from patients in India known to have liver disease demonstrated higher hepatic arsenic levels than controls (Narang, 1987a):
    .NHEPATIC As
    Controls (adults)1950.032 ppm
    Cirrhosis890.747 ppm
    Fulminant Hepatitis150.849 ppm
    Indian Childhood Cirrhosis390.865 ppm
    Wilson Disease42.229 ppm

    2) Liver biopsies from patients with hepatomegaly thought secondary to arsenic in well water in India showed various degrees of fibrosis and expansion of the portal zone resembling noncirrhotic portal fibrosis (Rahman et al, 2001; Guha Mazumder et al, 1992; Mazumder et al, 1988).
    3) Noncirrhotic portal hypertension has been associated with chronic arsenic exposure (Duenas et al, 1998; Guha Mazumda & Das Gupta, 1991; Nevens et al, 1990; Guha Mazumder et al, 1988).
    a) Portal hypertension has been noted with the use of Fowler's solution for 3 years (Tsuji et al, 2004).
    4) VENOOCCLUSIVE DISEASE: Hepatic venoocclusive disease with severe sinusoidal dilatation mainly in the centrilobular areas and subsequent perisinusoidal fibrosis associated with arsenic poisoning was seen in a 38-year-old man with a long-standing daily alcohol intake of 80 g (Labadie et al, 1990). The authors suggest that hepatic damage associated with arsenic poisoning is secondary to vascular endothelial injury.
    B) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mildly elevated AST concentrations (64 to 238 units/L) were reported in 5 of 7 teenagers (ages ranging from 15 to 18 years) who unintentionally ingested an unknown amount of herbicide containing monosodium methylarsonate 24%, mistakenly used as cooking oil. The AST concentrations peaked 3 days postingestion and normalized within 2 weeks (Cox & Orledge, 2011).
    C) HEPATIC FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 4-year-old child presented with abdominal pain and vomiting after ingesting an unknown amount of a chromated copper arsenate wood preservative containing 13.3% chromium, 7.8% copper, and 11.3% arsenic. Severe chemical burns were observed with an upper esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy. Fulminant liver and kidney failure were reported the next day. Due to hepatic encephalopathy, intubation and mechanical ventilation were necessary. The patient's initial blood arsenic concentration, obtained 3 days post-ingestion, was 206 mcg/L. Sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate was administered intravenously in order to increase the urinary excretion of arsenic; however, liver transplantation was considered the only viable option. In order to extract as much as possible the amount of protein and erythrocyte-bound arsenic and minimize the risk of toxicity to the transplanted liver, plasmapheresis and erythrocyte apheresis were performed, however, the blood arsenic concentration could not be reduced by plasmapheresis and was only reduced by 11% with erythrocyte apheresis. Liver transplantation was successful and the patient recovered uneventfully (Breuer et al, 2015).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Oliguria, anuria, hematuria, proteinuria (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Zaloga et al, 1970), acute tubular necrosis, renal failure have occurred following acute arsenic exposure (Breuer et al, 2015; Lai et al, 2005; Bartolome et al, 1999; Moore et al, 1994a; Vaziri et al, 1980; Giberson et al, 1976), and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis has been described (Gerhardt et al, 1978).
    b) A prospective study, involving 100 arsenic-exposed subjects, showed an increased incidence in hematuria, urinary ketones, and urinary bilirubin in subjects exposed to arsenic concentration of 50 to 150 mcg/L as compared with those subjects exposed to arsenic concentrations less than 50 mcg/L. It is suggested that these urinary effect parameters may be useful as biomarkers of arsenic-induced renal injury; however further studies are warranted (Dalal et al, 2008).
    B) IMPOTENCE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A study was conducted to determine the association between arsenic exposure and erectile dysfunction and involved sending questionnaires to 2 groups of men. The first group consisted of 66 men who were at least 50 years of age and living in an arsenic-endemic area in Taiwan. The second group consisted of 111 men who were at least 50 years of age and living in a non-arsenic-endemic area. The questionnaire included standardized questions regarding demographics, lifestyle factors, and disease records, as well as an International Index of Erectile Function (ILEF-5) questionnaire used to measure the level of erectile function in each participant. The results of the study showed that the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) was greater in the arsenic-endemic area (83.3%) as compared with the non-arsenic-endemic area (66.7%). The odds ratio (OR) in the greater than 50 parts per billion (ppb) arsenic-exposed group was 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 10.3), indicating a significant risk of ED in those subjects as compared with those individuals with exposure to arsenic at a concentration of 50 ppb or less, and the risk of developing severe ED (ILEF of 7 or greater) was also significantly higher in the greater than 50 ppb group with an OR of 7.5 (95% CI, 1.8 to 30.9) after adjusting for free testosterone and other risk factors of ED (Hsieh et al, 2008).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute hemolysis may occur after acute arsenic poisoning (Kyle & Pease, 1965). It is usually Coombs negative; abnormalities of developing normoblasts are also common (Ringenberg et al, 1988).
    B) HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A 51-year-old woman developed severe Coombs-negative intravascular hemolytic anemia with hemosiderinuria after long-term ingestion of a traditional Chinese medicine containing arsenic. Urine arsenic level was elevated. She was treated with red cell exchange without sequelae (Lee et al, 2004).
    C) PANCYTOPENIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Arsenic can disturb erythropoiesis and myelopoiesis (OSHA, 1988). After either acute or chronic arsenic exposure, pancytopenia may be seen (Rezuke et al, 1991; Kyle & Pease, 1965; Kjeldsberg & Ward, 1972; Bartolome et al, 1999). However, isolated anemia may also be seen.
    b) The anemia is usually normochromic and normocytic but may be hypochromic and microcytic (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    c) Bone marrow aspirate may demonstrate pronounced erythroid hyperplasia similar to that seen with pernicious anemia (Selzer & Ancel, 1983).
    d) Basophilic stippling and rouleau formation of red cells may also be seen (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    D) ACUTE LEUKEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Aplastic anemia and acute myelogenous leukemia have been described after chronic arsenic exposure (Kjeldsberg & Ward, 1972).
    E) ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ACUTE: Decreases in the hemoglobin and hematocrit values were the only sequelae possibly associated with an acute ingestion of approximately 1.2 grams arsenic as sodium arsenate in a 44-year-old woman (Chan & Matthews, 1990).
    b) CHRONIC: Anemia has also been reported after chronic arsenic exposure (Rahman et al, 2001; Guha Mazumder et al, 1992).
    F) MACROCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A patient presented with macrocytosis and peripheral neuropathy but without anemia after chronic exposure to an arsenical pesticide (Heaven et al, 1994).
    G) LEUKOPENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia have been reported following use of an arsenic-containing homeopathic preparation (Chakraborti et al, 2003).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Leukopenia was reported in 3 patients following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl alcohol solution that contained arsenic 30% instead of the prescribed benzyl benzoate 25% for the treatment of scabies (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).
    H) DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 4-month-old developed evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation within 11.5 hours of ingesting arsenic. He died 36 hours after ingestion despite aggressive chelation and resuscitation(Lai et al, 2005).
    3.13.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) LYMPHOCYTES ATYPICAL
    a) IN VITRO: Tests of human whole blood lymphocytes exposed to arsenite and arsenate in concentrations similar to those found in the blood of exposed humans revealed a dose-related inhibition of proliferation (Gonsebatt et al, 1992).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GENERALIZED EXFOLIATIVE DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Skin findings after either acute or chronic arsenic poisoning may include flushing, diaphoresis, diffuse pigmentation, hyperkeratosis of palms and/or soles, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, leuko-melanoderma, brawny desquamation, and exfoliative dermatitis (Dakeishi et al, 2006; Tsuji et al, 2004; Ahasan, 2001; Huang et al, 1998a; Hutton & Christians, 1983; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Zaloga et al, 1970; Heyman et al, 1956) .
    1) ACUTE: A 45-year-old woman intentionally ingested between 8 and 16 g of sodium arsenite and developed multiorgan failure along with an erythroderma with vesicles and pustules. Skin biopsies showed multiple small pigment granules inside and outside the histiocytes. Prednisone was started on hospital day 12 with improvement of the cutaneous lesions. At 2 month follow-up, cutaneous lesions were absent (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    2) CHRONIC: In a small study of individuals chronically exposed to well water which contained arsenic, the duration of skin lesions lasted from 2 to 8 years (Ahasan, 2001).
    b) ENDEMIC ARSENISM: Outbreaks of arsenic poisoning from water are common in the West Bengal and Bangladesh countries, and it was found that clinical symptoms often did not manifest until 6 months to 10 years after exposure. The first signs and symptoms of chronic exposure were related to dermatologic changes. Arsenical skin lesions included melanokeratosis, diffuse melanosis, spotted melanosis (raindrop pigmentation), leukomelanosis, and keratosis. Minor dermatological changes included buccal mucous membrane pigmentation, nonpitting edema, and red eyes (without signs or symptoms of inflammation) (Mukherjee et al, 2005; Rahman et al, 2001).
    c) INCIDENCE: In a review of 648 cases of patients with cutaneous lesions, 17 (2.6%) had cutaneous lesions associated with long-term arsenic exposure. Of those, 15 patients (88%) had asthma, of whom 14 (93%) ingested Chinese proprietary medicines which contained inorganic arsenic and the remaining patients had a history of ingesting well water contaminated with arsenic (Wong et al, 1998).
    1) Bowen disease (precancerous dermatosis) and palmar arsenical keratoses were reported in all 17 patients; 14 (82%) had plantar arsenical keratoses, 4 (24%) had arsenical keratoses on the arms, and 4 (24%) had arsenical keratoses at other sites. Eleven patients had macular hypopigmentation; no patient developed hyperpigmentation.
    d) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman presented with worsening alopecia and memory loss. She also experienced diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, an erythematous rash bilaterally on her lower extremities, and onycholysis. A spot urine sample indicated an arsenic concentration of 83.6 mcg/g creatinine (normal less than 50 mcg/g creatinine). A review of the patient's medication history revealed that she had been taking kelp supplements for treatment of menopause (2 to 4 tablets/day for 1 year). Analysis of a kelp supplement sample showed an arsenic concentration of 8.5 mg/kg. Discontinuation of the supplements resulted in complete resolution of her symptoms. A repeat spot urine sample, obtained 2 months after the first urine sample, revealed an arsenic level of 25 mcg/L (normal 0 to 50 mcg/L) (Amster et al, 2007).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 73-year-old man, from Thailand, presented with several dermal lesions, including basal cell carcinoma at the lower abdomen, arsenical keratoses on his left forearm and knee, and punctate palmoplantar keratosis. Analysis of his pubic hair and nails revealed elevated arsenic concentrations of 4.76 and 3.29 mcg/g, respectively (normal less than 3 mcg/g). The lesions resolved following treatment with imiquimod 5% cream. A review of the patient's history revealed that he had long-term exposure to Thai proprietary medicines, presumably containing arsenic (Boonchai, 2006).
    B) SKIN FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Sixty-seven people became ill after eating arsenic-laced curry at a festival in Japan. Four of the victims died. During the acute stage of the poisoning, 56% of the patients developed dermatologic signs and symptoms. Conjunctival hemorrhage was observed in 15 patients, facial edema in 13 patients, acral desquamation in 11 patients, maculopapular eruptions in the intertriginous areas in 8 patients, transient flushing erythema in 5 patients, and herpesvirus infection in 3 patients. Histopathological examination of the maculopapular eruptions revealed moderate to marked perivascular infiltration with endothelial swelling (Uede & Furukawa, 2003).
    C) NEOPLASM OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: Basal cell and squamous cell cancers of the skin may also be seen years after exposure (Ahasan, 2001; Sass et al, 1993; Renwick et al, 1981; Wagner et al, 1979; Jackson & Grainge, 1975). Merkel cell carcinoma has also been associated with chronic arsenism in a small number of patients (Lien et al, 1999).
    1) LATENCY: The latency period is at least 10 years, and the carcinomas usually occur on unexposed areas of the body (Parish & Burnett, 1987) and are usually multifocal and randomly distributed (Shannon & Strayer, 1989).
    a) In 1 study, the mean age at presentation of skin cancer was 63.6 years with a latency period of 40.6 years (Wong et al, 1998).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 73-year-old man from Thailand presented with several dermal lesions, including basal cell carcinoma at the lower abdomen, arsenical keratoses on his left forearm and knee, and punctate palmoplantar keratosis. Analysis of his pubic hair and nails revealed elevated arsenic concentrations of 4.76 and 3.29 mcg/g, respectively (normal less than 3 mcg/g). The lesions resolved following treatment with imiquimod 5% cream. A review of the patient's history revealed that he had long-term exposure to Thai proprietary medicines, presumably containing arsenic (Boonchai, 2006).
    D) MELANOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Melanosis and keratosis have been reported following use of arsenic-containing homeopathic preparations (Chakraborti et al, 2003; Tsuji et al, 2004).
    E) MEE'S LINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Transverse white striae of the nails (Mees lines) may be seen after acute or chronic exposure (Duenas-Laita et al, 2005; Sass et al, 1993). Mees lines commonly take 5 weeks to appear above the cuticle and advance 1 mm per week afterwards, allowing the approximation of the time of acute exposure (Heyman et al, 1956).
    F) HERPES ZOSTER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Shingles have been reported following arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966).
    G) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SENSITIZATION: Arsenic pentoxide can cause contact dermatitis (OSHA, 1988).
    b) CASE REPORT: The organic arsenical pesticide cacodylic acid has caused airborne contact dermatitis (Bourrain et al, 1998).
    H) ALOPECIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman presented with worsening alopecia and memory loss. She also experienced diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, an erythematous rash bilaterally on her lower extremities, and onycholysis. A spot urine sample indicated an arsenic concentration of 83.6 mcg/g creatinine (normal less than 50 mcg/g creatinine). A review of the patient's medication history revealed that she had been taking kelp supplements for treatment of menopause (2 to 4 tablets/day for 1 year). Analysis of a kelp supplement sample showed an arsenic concentration of 8.5 mg/kg. Discontinuation of the supplements resulted in complete resolution of her symptoms. A repeat spot urine sample, obtained 2 months after the first urine sample, revealed an arsenic level of 25 mcg/L (normal 0 to 50 mcg/L) (Amster et al, 2007).
    I) BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Seven patients developed dermal toxicity, including pruritus, severe rash, burns, blisters, and bullae, following dermal application, from neck to toe, of an isopropyl solution containing arsenic 30% instead of the prescribed benzyl benzoate 25% for the treatment of scabies. Three patients, including a pregnant woman (38 weeks gestation) subsequently developed hypotension and respiratory distress and died within 72 hours following application of the solution. The other 4 patients received symptomatic and supportive therapy and were discharged 4 to 5 days postadmission (Majid Cheraghali et al, 2007).
    b) CASE REPORT: Severe chemical burns were reported, following an upper esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy, in a 4-year-old boy who ingested an unknown amount of a chromated copper arsenate (CCA) wood preservative, containing 13.3% chromium, 7.8% copper, and 11.3% arsenic (Breuer et al, 2015).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Disruption of the normal oxidative intermyofibrillar network (involving type I fibers), perifascicular hypercontracted fibers, increased vacuolization in approximately 30% of fibers, abnormally enlarged mitochondria with loss of cristae, and abundant lipid vacuoles separating the myofibrils has been found on muscle biopsy (Fernandez-Sola et al, 1991).
    b) CASE REPORT: Mild rhabdomyolysis (CPK 1200 units/L) developed in a 21-year-old man who ingested 4 grams of arsenic (Moore et al, 1994a).
    B) MUSCLE PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Myalgia and myopathy have been reported following chronic exposure and are considered rare events (Rahman et al, 2001).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DIABETES MELLITUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC EXPOSURE: A dose-related increase in prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been seen in residents of areas where arsenism is hyperendemic and in workers exposed to arsenic at a copper smelter (Coronado-Gonzalez et al, 2007; Rahman et al, 1998; Rahman & Axelson, 1995; Lai et al, 1994). However, there was no increased incidence of diabetes mellitus among Swedish art glass workers with chronic arsenic exposure (Rahman et al, 1996)
    1) Type 2 diabetes mellitus also appeared to be more prevalent following chronic arsenic exposure, according to a cross-sectional study of 788 adults who participated in the 2003 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The median urine concentrations of total arsenic and dimethylarsinate were 7.1 mcg/L and 3 mcg/L, respectively. Following adjustments for sociodemographic and diabetes risk factors, the participants with type 2 diabetes had a 26% higher total urine arsenic concentration and 10% higher dimethylarsinate concentration as compared with non-type 2 diabetic participants. Comparing participants in the 80th versus the 20th percentiles of total urine arsenic, the odds ratios for diabetes was 3.58 (95% CI, 1.18 to 10.83) after adjusting for biomarkers of seafood intake (Navas-Acien et al, 2008).
    b) RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS: Data from the Canadian Health Measures Survey was collected from 2007 to 2009 to evaluate the association between arsenic exposure (based on urinary arsenic concentration) and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in adults. The analysis included 3151 participants (ages 20 to 79 years) and were divided into 3 groups: prediabetes (n=831; fasting glucose level between 100 and 125 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7% and 6.4%), type 2 diabetes (n=225; fasting glucose level 126 mg/dL or greater or HbA1c 6.5% or greater), and the control group (n=2054; not diabetic or prediabetic). There was no data on 41 patients. According to urinary arsenic quartiles (less than 5.71 mcg/L, 5.71 to 11.20 mcg/L, 11.21 to 22.98 mcg/L, and 22.99 mcg/L and greater), there is a 1.8-fold higher risk for type 2 diabetes in patients at the highest urinary arsenic quartile (22.99 mcg/L or greater) than for those patients at the lowest urinary arsenic quartile (less than 5.71 mcg/L), after adjusting for age and gender, diabetes risk factors, urinary creatinine, and seafood consumption. Similarly, there is 2.1-fold higher risk for prediabetes in patients at the highest urinary arsenic quartile than for those patients at the lowest urinary arsenic quartile, indicating a positive association between arsenic exposure and the prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. However, causal inference is limited due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the absence of long-term assessment of arsenic exposure (Feseke et al, 2015).
    B) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hyperglycemia was observed following IV infusion of arsenic in the treatment of leukemia (Tsuji et al, 2004).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 4-month-old infant developed hyperglycemia (serum glucose 286 mg/dL 6 hours after ingestion) after a lethal arsenic ingestion (Lai et al, 2005).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Inorganic arsenic crosses the placenta and may result in spontaneous abortion or stillbirth with either acute or chronic poisoning.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) CONGENITAL ANOMALY
    1) Birth defects of the cardiovascular system tended to be elevated in areas with high levels of arsenic in the drinking water, as determined in a survey of 30 US counties from 1968 to 1984 (Engel & Smith, 1994).
    2) There is no evidence that adverse effects on human reproduction will occur at permissible exposure limits (Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985).
    3) From clinical experience there were five cases of arsenic poisoning during pregnancy which resulted in normal offspring (Kantor & Levin, 1948). Organic arsenicals have been used during pregnancy to treat congenital syphilis in the fetus with apparently no ill effect on the unborn (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).
    4) A critical analysis of literature concluded that in environmentally relevant exposure scenarios (such as 100 ppm in soil), inorganic arsenic is unlikely to pose a risk to pregnant women and their offspring (DeSesso et al, 1998).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CONGENITAL ANOMALY
    a) Arsenic (inorganic) is teratogenic in rodents at doses of 20 mg/kg or greater.
    b) In mice, the combination of maternal restraint stress and arsenic (in the form of sodium arsenate at 20 mg/kg IP on day 9) produced roughly twice the incidence of exencephaly than either agent alone (Rasco & Hood, 1994).
    c) There have been many studies on the reproductive effects of arsenic and its compounds in laboratory animals. Typically they can cause birth defects at high doses which may have been toxic to the mothers. Birth defects have been found in chickens (sodium ortho arsenate) (Ridgway & Karnofsky, 1952), in hamsters (disodium arsenate) (Ferm, 1971), in mice (sodium arsenate and sodium arsenite) (Baxley, 1981; Hood & Bishop, 1972), and in rats (sodium arsenate) (Beaudoin, 1974).
    d) IP injection of 40 mg/kg arsenate on days 7 and 8 of gestation induced 90 to 100 percent neural tube defects in the susceptible strain LM Bc of mice. Analysis of gene expression showed increased transcription of bcl-2 and p53 on day 9, compared with controls. This result suggests that arsenic induces neural tube defects in mice via inhibition of cell proliferation, rather than by inducing apoptosis. Whether or not arsenic can induce neural tube defects in humans is controversial (Wlodarczyk et al, 1996).
    e) Generally the maximum activity for inducing birth defects in animals was at doses which were equally toxic to the mothers (OTA, 1985). Arsenite was more active than arsenate, but both were less active orally than when injected (OTA, 1985).
    f) The teratogenicity of arsenate was antagonized by sodium selenite in hamsters (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982), a finding consistent with the general antagonism between these two families of compounds. Heat was synergistic with arsenic in hamsters. Chelating agents which are known to remove arsenic from the body, such as BAL (2,3-dimercaptopropanol), reduced the teratogenicity of sodium arsenate in mice (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) HUMANS
    1) PREGNANCY OUTCOMES
    a) An increased number of spontaneous abortions, preterm births, and low birth weight infants occurred in women who were exposed to arsenic in drinking water during pregnancy at concentrations ranging from 284 to 1474 mcg/L (Mukherjee et al, 2005).
    b) A systematic review and meta-analysis found that high levels of arsenic in the groundwater is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and infant mortality, as well as a significant reduction in birth weight; the association between arsenic exposure and preterm delivery was inconclusive. Analysis of data from 6 studies on spontaneous abortion showed that populations exposed to high arsenic concentrations (greater than 50 mcg/L) in groundwater had a significant nearly 2-fold increased risk of spontaneous abortion, while the findings for populations exposed to low to moderate levels of arsenic in groundwater or tap water were inconclusive. Analysis of data from 8 studies showed that populations exposed to high arsenic levels in groundwater had a significant 77% increased risk of stillbirth; 1 study conducted in a population with low-to-moderate arsenic exposure (less than 50 mcg/L) found a significant 4 times increased risk of stillbirth. Analysis of data from 5 studies examining neonatal mortality in populations exposed to high arsenic levels in groundwater found a significant 51% increased risk of neonatal mortality and 7 studies on infant mortality showed a significant 35% increased risk of infant mortality with high arsenic exposure. Analysis of data from 4 studies on birth weight showed that environmental arsenic exposure was associated with a significant reduction in birth weight of 53.2 g. The causal association between arsenic exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including infant mortality, is limited by the number of studies on dose response (Quansah et al, 2015).
    2) STILLBIRTH
    a) Acute ingestion of arsenic in a female with a 30-week pregnancy has been reported to result in the death of the infant born 4 days after the poisoning (Lugo et al, 1969). The child apparently died of hyaline membrane disease but did have elevated tissue levels of arsenic. It seems apparent that arsenic can cross the placenta.
    b) Associations between arsenic exposure in populations living near or working in smelters and an increased incidence of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths have been reported, but the studies are difficult to interpret because multiple chemical exposures were involved (Golub et al, 1998) Sholot et al, 1996).
    c) There was an increased incidence of stillbirths in an Hispanic population in central Texas where arsenical agricultural products had been produced for 60 years (Ihrig et al, 1998).
    d) Maternal exposure, during pregnancy, to drinking water contaminated with arsenic, has resulted in an increased risk of infant death and fetal loss. The risk of infant death, in particular, appeared to be significantly directly proportional to the amount of exposure to arsenic during pregnancy (Rahman et al, 2007).
    3) PREGNANCY DISORDER
    a) Early chelation therapy is thought to have abrogated the toxic effect of an acute arsenic ingestion in a woman and her 20-week fetus (Daya et al, 1989).
    4) LABORATORY TEST ABNORMAL
    a) In a study of women living near a copper smelter, placental arsenic levels increased with increasing arsenic levels in the environment (Tabacova et al, 1994). Higher levels of arsenic exposure were associated with a lower percentage of reduced compared with total glutathione levels in maternal and cord blood, suggesting reduced antioxidant protection.
    b) A similar study did not find increased arsenic body burdens in pregnant Swedish women (Jakobsson-Lagerkvist et al, 1993).
    5) ANEMIA
    a) A prospective cohort study was conducted, involving two groups of pregnant women. The first group was exposed to drinking water arsenic levels of 40 mcg/L and the second group was exposed to drinking water arsenic levels of less than 1 mcg/L . During the first trimester of pregnancy, anemia, as measured by at least one hemoglobin level, appeared to occur more frequently in the high arsenic level-exposed group as compared with the low arsenic level-exposed group (10.3% (n=242) versus 6.9% (n=248)) and also appeared to be more prevalent as the pregnancy progressed to the third trimester (46% (n=274) versus 17.5% (n=240)) (Hopenhayn et al, 2006). During pregnancy, the most common type of anemia is primarily due to iron or folate deficiency. In this study, analysis of 150 women demonstrated that serum transferrin receptor and folate measurements did not differ between the two groups; therefore, the differences in anemia rates between the two groups are most likely not a result of iron or folate deficiency, but may be associated with an increase in arsenic intake.
    6) LOW BIRTH WEIGHT
    a) A prospective cohort study, involving 52 pregnant women, was conducted to determine an association between arsenic exposure and birth weight. The women were recruited from a region within Bangladesh that was highly contaminated with arsenic. Maternal hair, toenails, and drinking water samples were collected at the first prenatal visit and within 2 weeks after birth. Comparison of maternal and newborn arsenic concentrations showed that there was a significant correlation between maternal hair samples taken at the first prenatal visit and newborn hair samples (0.32; p=0.04), although there was no significant correlation between maternal hair samples taken within 2 weeks after birth and newborn hair samples. There was also no significant correlation between maternal nail samples taken at the first prenatal visit or within 2 weeks after birth and newborn nail samples. However, linear regression analyses demonstrated a significant negative association between maternal hair arsenic concentrations at the first prenatal visit and newborn birth weight (-193.5 +/-90 g; p=0.04); for every 1 mcg/g increase in arsenic, the birthweight decreased by 194 grams (Huyck et al, 2007).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) HUMANS
    a) In a population of women living in an area of the Argentinean Andes where drinking water contains about 200 mcg/L of arsenic, the average breast milk arsenic concentration was 2.3 mcg/kg fresh weight (range: 0.83 to 7.6 mcg/kg). Urinary arsenic concentrations in 2 nursing infants were low (17 and 47 mcg/L), indicating that inorganic arsenic is not secreted to any significant extent in breast milk, as maternal blood and urine arsenic levels were 10 and 320 mcg/L, respectively (Concha et al, 1998).
    b) Arsenic is transferred across the placenta and into breast milk (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982). There may be some risk to nursing infants of mothers exposed to arsenic from evidence in Japanese children who drank arsenic-contaminated powdered milk and who may have suffered problems in later brain development (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7440-38-2 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 1
    1) The agent (mixture) is carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent (mixture) may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent (mixture) acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Chronic therapeutic, occupational, and environmental arsenic exposure have been associated with lung, bladder, skin, and other cancers in humans.
    B) Exposures as little as 1 gram per year have been associated with CANCER (HSDB).
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow (Anon, 1979).
    2) In a study of the inhabitants of the 3 hydro-geological regions of the Cordoba province in Argentina, arsenic content in drinking water from groundwater wells was associated with increased risk of colon cancer in women, and lung and bladder cancers in both genders, but there was no statistically significant association between arsenic content and breast cancer. As estimated by the Poisson multilevel model with arsenic content as a continuous covariate in the first level of the model, the arsenic incidence rate ratios (IRRs) in women and men, respectively, were as follows for each tumor site: colon, 12.21 (95% CI, 5.72 to 26.07; p less than 0.001), 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; p less than 0.001); lung, 56.03 (95% CI, 24.08 to 130.4; p less than 0.001), 9.61 (95% CI, 6.59 to 14; p less than 0.001); bladder, 12.66 (95% CI, 2.51 to 63.93; p less than 0.005), 13.8 (95% CI, 6.8 to 28; p less than 0.001); and breast, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.6; non-significant p value), women only. While cancer incidence in this region may partially be related to the arsenic content in drinking water, arsenic exposure from cropping activities, industrial pollution, and work sites may also affect the development of certain malignancies in populations of rural Cordoba (Aballay et al, 2012).
    3) A study of a population in Taiwan with high-arsenic artesian well water found a dose-response relationship between the amount of arsenic in the water and the incidence of mortality from bladder, kidney, skin, prostate, lung, and liver cancer (Chen et al, 1988) In an area with high-arsenic artesian well water and endemic to Blackfoot disease (dry gangrene postulated to be associated with chronic arsenic exposure), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for kidney cancer and prostate cancer gradually decreased in the population following installation of a tap water supply system that eliminated arsenic from the well water, suggesting a causal association between arsenic exposure and the development of kidney and prostate cancers (Yang et al, 2008; Yang et al, 2004). .
    a) Another study found a dose response relationship between the amount of arsenic in well water and the mortality rate from kidney, bladder, liver and lung cancer (Chen et al, 1992).
    b) Another study of populations in Taiwan exposed to high concentrations of arsenic in artesian well water found a dose response relationship between the estimated cumulative arsenic exposure and the incidence of lung and bladder cancers and of all cancers combined (Chiou et al, 1995). Patients with Blackfoot disease had an increased risk of cancer.
    4) CASE REPORTS: Epithelioid angiosarcoma of the adrenal gland was described in a 59-year-old vineyard cultivator who was exposed to arsenic-containing insecticides for 20 years and in a 60-year-old man treated with potassium arsenite for psoriasis for 10 years (Livaditou et al, 1991) Duenas et al, 1988).
    5) SINONASAL CANCER: Three cases of sinonasal cancer (adenocarcinoma, melanoma, squamocellular carcinoma) have been reported amongst arsenic-exposed art glass workers (Battista et al, 1996).
    6) An epidemiological study in Belgium of persons exposed to 0.3 nanograms/cubic meter or arsenic in air or 20 to 50 micrograms of arsenic per liter in drinking water did not find any increased cancer mortality, suggesting a non-linear dose-response relationship (Buchet & Lison, 1998).
    7) Arsenic is a known human carcinogen for lung and skin cancers (IARC, 1973; Hathaway et al, 1991) and possibly for angiosarcoma of the liver and stomach cancer (EOSH, 1982). Typically there is a 15 to 30 year latency before development of the cancers (EOSH, 1982).
    8) The association between arsenic and respiratory cancer was stronger after adjusting in various ways for the healthy worker effect (Arrighi & Hertzpicciotto, 1996).
    9) In a group of arsenic miners exposed to insoluble arsenic in the form of arsenopyrite, levels of arsenic in the lungs averaged 51.4 mcg/g dry tissue, and correlated with duration of exposure as well as incidence of lung cancer. Metabolites formed (arsenous acid, arsenic acid, methyl arsenate and dimethyl arsenate) were identical to those formed from arsenic trioxide. Arsenopyrite should therefore be considered a human carcinogen (Liu & Chen, 1996).
    10) Arsenic is one of the rare cases where the evidence in humans for its carcinogenic effects is much stronger than in animals. It has not produced cancer in animals except by implantation (RTECS). The role of ingested arsenic in cancers has been reviewed (Engel & Receveur, 1993).
    11) Critics have pointed out that both the Argentine and Taiwan studies show a dose-response relationship between inorganic arsenic exposure and mortality from bladder cancer, but neither study has sufficient data to allow specific risks to be related to specific exposures (Brown & Beck, 1996).
    12) The authors of the Taiwanese study have concluded that application of the cancer risk estimates from Taiwanese farmers may overestimate American risks from arsenic, because their diet of rice and yams contains high amounts of inorganic arsenic, and their daily intake of arsenic-contaminated water is higher than the US average (Slayton et al, 1996). Estimates of arsenic exposure and the role of arsenic methylation in cancer risk estimates from the Taiwanese study are controversial (Mushak & Crocetti, 1996).
    13) Arsenic is an INDIRECT CARCINOGEN. It induces cancer by a mechanism of generalized induction of genes (Appel et al, 1984), rather than inducing mutations in specific genes. The question of whether or not there is a threshold for induction of cancer by arsenic has been a matter of much debate. A recent review of the literature has concluded that the threshold for arsenic-induced cancer is the same as that for arsenical skin disease: 400 mcg per day; a further conclusion is that the development of hyperpigmentation may be a sensitive indicator of risk for subsequent development of cancer in the same individual (Stohrer, 1991).
    14) An epidemiologic study was conducted to determine the mortality of 1386 patients who developed arseniasis due to long-term exposure to indoor combustion of high arsenic coal. During the observation period (1992 to 2004) 106 patients died, with liver cirrhosis, non-melanotic skin cancer, lung cancer, and liver cancer being the most prevalent causes of death (70.8% of the total death cases). Although the mortality of all death causes combined appeared to be significantly less than the general Chinese population in 2001 (Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) = 0.76), the mortality rate of non-melanotic skin cancer in males was up to 128.66 per million, as compared to the Chinese population as a whole with a mortality rate of less than 1 per million. The SMRs in males for lung cancer and larynx cancer were also significant, with a ratio of 2.84 and 27.27, respectively (p<0.01) (Chen et al, 2007a).
    B) SKIN CARCINOMA
    1) Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin have been described after both acute (Renwick et al, 1981) and chronic (Jackson & Grainge, 1975; Wagner et al, 1979) Nazmul Ahasan, 2001) arsenic exposure.
    a) CASE SERIES: In a review of 648 patients with cutaneous lesions associated with long-term arsenic exposure, 7 patients developed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). One patient had a history of carcinoma of the larynx before skin lesions appeared. The authors observed the following risk factors: ingestion of arsenic at an older age and were more likely to have palmar arsenical keratoses compared with those without SCC (Wong et al, 1998).
    2) Two patients with arsenic-induced basal cell carcinomas of the skin also developed malignancies of other organs (breast and colon) (Jackson & Grainge, 1975).
    3) In a small study of patients who developed Merkel cell carcinoma an association with chronic arsenism was observed (Lien et al, 1999).
    C) BLADDER CARCINOMA
    1) In a cohort study of 478 patients treated with Fowler's solution (potassium arsenite) during the period 1945-1969, a significant excess of bladder cancer mortality occurred. It has been suggested that persons who have ingested arsenic may be at risk of developing bladder cancer and may be suitable for regular screening, especially if signs of arsenic exposure, such as palmar keratoses, are present (Cuzick et al, 1992).
    2) An historical cohort study of a Japanese population that consumed well water with high arsenic concentrations (>1 ppm) for five years found an excess mortality from kidney and bladder cancer (standardized mortality ratio 31.2) (Tsuda et al, 1995).
    3) A marked increased incidence of bladder cancer was found in a population in northern Chile chronically exposed by drinking groundwater with high arsenic levels (Smith et al, 1998).
    4) A Taiwanese population exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water had an increased incidence of bladder, kidney, ureter, and urethral cancers, although there was no increased incidence of some specific types (i.e., nephroblastomas, renal cell carcinomas, or bladder adenocarcinomas) (Guo et al, 1997).
    5) An Argentinean population with chronic arsenic exposure in drinking water had a dose-related increased incidence of bladder cancer(Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1996).
    6) Steinmaus et al (2003) studied the incidence of bladder cancer in 6 counties in western Nevada and 1 county in California. No clear association was found between bladder cancer risk and the exposures. There was some evidence of elevated relative risks for bladder cancer in smokers exposed to drinking water arsenic at levels near 200 mcg/day (Steinmaus et al, 2003).
    7) Findings in Argentinean (114 cases; 114 controls) and US (23 cases; 49 controls) study populations of urinary arsenic methylation revealed bladder cancer risk increased with increasing urinary levels of arsenic methylation products such as monomethylarsenate. Smokers experienced an increased risk over non-smokers (Steinmaus et al, 2006).
    8) Bladder cancer mortality rates were compared during a 50-year study (from 1950 to 2000) in two different regions in Chile, one region that experienced marked increases of arsenic in drinking water (region II) and one region whose water was not contaminated with arsenic (region V). Results of the study showed that the peak mortality rate ratio (RR) for men occurred from 1986 to 1988 at 6.10 (95% CI, 3.97 to 9.39), and the mortality rates per 100,000 persons per year, for the same time period, were 21 for region II as compared with 5 for region V. For women, the peak RR occurred from 1992 to 1994 at 13.8 (95% CI, 7.74 to 24.5), and the mortality rates per 100,000 persons per year, for the same time period, were 16 for region II as compared with 2 for region V (Marshall et al, 2007). In region II as compared with region V, the number of excess deaths due to bladder cancer peaked at 86 for men and 69 for women during the periods from 1991 to 1995 and 1996 to 2000, respectively (considered to be periods of low arsenic exposure) (Yuan et al, 2007).
    9) Another study evaluated the bladder cancer hospital discharge and mortality rates in recent decades from Antofagasta, Chile (region II), which was affected by significant arsenic contamination of drinking water in 1958 when arsenic concentrations increased from 90 to between 800 and 900 mcg/L (up to 17 times greater than WHO recommendations for arsenic levels between 1958 to 1971). As compared with the rest of Chile, the hospital discharge rates for bladder cancer were significantly higher in the affected region, where the incident rate ratio (IRR) from 2001 to 2007 was 4.4 (95% CI, 3.9 to 4.9) for women and 2.7 (95% CI, 2.5 to 2.9) for men. The mortality rate from bladder cancer peaked for men in Antofagasta in 1991 at 26.7 deaths per 100,000 habitants, while the mortality rate for men in the rest of Chile peaked in 2009 at 5.8 per 100,000. The mortality rate peaked for women in Antofagasta in 2001 at 18.6 per 100,000, while the mortality rate for women in the rest of Chile peaked in 2006 at 3.1 per 100,000. According to poison regression models, an increased mortality risk was shown for the studied region as compared with the rest of the country, with the IRR for the analyzed period of 1983 to 2009 being 7.8 (95% CI, 7 to 8.7) for women and 5.3 (95% CI, 4.8 to 5.8) for men. The mean age at death from bladder cancer was significantly lower in the exposed region as compared with the rest of Chile (69.6 years; 95% CI, 68.4 to 70.7 years vs 73.7 years; 95% CI, 73.3 to 74.2 years, p less than 0.001) (Fernandez et al, 2012).
    10) A meta-analysis of epidemiological studies was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship between the risk of bladder cancer and arsenic ingestion from drinking water. Based on the composite results of this meta-analysis and utilizing the most recent arsenic maximum contaminant level reported (ie, 10 mcg/L), the associated bladder cancer risk (lifetime excess probability) is 2.29 x 10(-5), which is considerably lower than the National Research Council's theoretical lifetime excess risk for bladder cancer in the United States of 1.2 x 10(-3) in women and 2.3 x 10 (-3) in men (Chu & Crawford-Brown, 2006).
    D) PULMONARY CARCINOMA
    1) Analysis of worker exposure to arsenic and the incidence of lung cancer has yielded conflicting results. In Sweden and China, a positive dose-response relationship has been found (Jarup & Pershagen, 1991; Jarup et al, 1989; Weiai, 1988) Liu & Chan, 1996); this has not confirmed in one study (Sobel et al, 1988), but was in agreement with two others (Enterline et al, 1987; Lee-Feldstein, 1989).
    2) The histologic types of lung cancer among smelter workers developing lung cancer does not appear to be different from that seen in smokers, even among workers who have never smoked (Pershagen et al, 1987). The incidence of lung cancer among women residing near a smelter was not different than for controls (Frost et al, 1987).
    3) Jarup & Pershagen (1991) reported lung cancer risks were positively related to cumulative arsenic exposure after control of smoking in a case-control study of 3,916 Swedish copper smelter workers (Jarup & Pershagen, 1991). An updated study of 2802 copper smelter workers found a positive relationship between airborne exposures and cancers of the respiratory tract, bone, and kidney (Enterline et al, 1995).
    4) An historical cohort study of a Japanese population that consumed well water with high arsenic concentrations (greater than 1 ppm) for five years found an excess mortality from lung cancer (standardized mortality ratio 15.7) and a synergistic effect from smoking (Tsuda et al, 1995). Bronchogenic carcinoma (one case) was also diagnosed in a study of individuals (n=11) exposed to well water in India which contained arsenic (Nazmul Ahasan HAM, 2001).
    5) A study of French workers in gold mines and refineries exposed to arsenic, radon and silica found an excess mortality from lung cancer (Simonato et al, 1994).
    6) A marked increased incidence of lung cancer was found in a population in northern Chile chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water (Smith et al, 1998).
    7) There seems to be a synergistic effect between occupational exposure to airborne arsenic and smoking (Hertz-Piccioto et al, 1992; (Tsuda et al, 1995; Jarup & Pershagen, 1991)
    8) Chronic arsenic exposure due to ingestion of contaminated ground water was studied in 107 subjects. A pulmonary malignancy was found in 4 subjects (12.1%); adenocarcinoma in 1, squamous cell in 2, and undifferentiated 1 (Majumdar et al, 2004).
    9) The incidence of lung cancer was studied in 10,591 residents in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan during an 8-year period. Exposure was from contaminated drinking water. During follow-up, there were 139 newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer. Compared with the lowest arsenic level, the relative risk for the highest arsenic level was 3.29 (95% CI, 1.60 to 6.78). After adjustment for other risk factors, including ingested arsenic exposure, current and past smokers had a 4-fold risk of lung cancer, compared with non-smokers (Chen et al, 2004).
    10) In a study of 3979 primary smelter workers, 46 respiratory malignancies were reported. Smoking and cumulative air arsenic exposure were identified as risk factors for the development of cancer (Lundstrom et al, 2006).
    11) A retrospective study, comparing the mortality rates in Antofagasta, Chile during a period of high arsenic exposure in the drinking water (1958-1971) with the rest of Chile, found that the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for lung cancer in patients born just before the period of exposure (1950-1957), and exposed during early childhood, was 7.0 (95% CI, 5.4-8.9; p<0.001). For those individuals, born during the exposure period (1958-1970), and who were exposed in utero, the SMR was 6.1 (95% CI, 3.5-9.9; p<0.001), suggesting that mortality in adults from lung cancer was similar following chronic arsenic exposure from drinking water during early childhood or in utero (Smith et al, 2006).
    12) Lung cancer mortality rates were compared during a 50-year study (from 1950 to 2000) in two different regions in Chile, one region that experienced marked increases of arsenic in drinking water (region II) and one region whose water was not contaminated with arsenic (region V). Results of the study showed that the peak mortality rate ratio (RR) for men occurred from 1992 to 1994 at 3.61 (95% CI, 3.13 to 4.16), and the mortality rates per 100,000 persons per year, for the same time period, were 130 for region II as compared with 47 for region V. For women, the peak RR occurred from 1989 to 1991 at 3.26 (95% CI, 2.50 to 4.23), and the mortality rates per 100,000 persons per year, for the same time period, were 38 for region II as compared with 15 for region V (Marshall et al, 2007). In region II as compared with region V, the number of excess deaths due to lung cancer peaked at 412 for men and 113 for women during the periods from 1991 to 1995 and 1996 to 2000, respectively (considered to be periods of low arsenic exposure) (Yuan et al, 2007)
    E) STOMACH CARCINOMA
    1) A cohort study of 58,677 miners employed at a uranium company in East Germany for at least 6 months between 1946 and 1989 found a non-linear increased risk of stomach cancer with arsenic exposure. After adjusting for cumulative absorbed dose from alpha and low-LET radiation and fine dust, a 2.1-fold higher RR (95% CI, 0.9 to 3.3) was present in the highest exposure category of greater than 500 dust-years compared with 0 dust-years. There was also a positive trend between exposure to low-linear energy transfer (low-LET) radiation and stomach cancer (excess relative risk/Gray (ERR/Gy)=1.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 2.78) and a statistically significant increased relative risk (RR) for the highest category of low-LET radiation cumulative dose greater than or equal to 250 milligray (mGy) compared with the reference category of 0 mGy (RR=1.73; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.36) based on 592 deaths from stomach cancer. However, after adjusting for cumulative fine dust exposure, alpha radiation, and arsenic dust, no statistically significant trend was observed for absorbed dose from low-LET radiation (ERR/Gy=0.30; 95% CI, -1.26 to 1.87), alpha radiation (ERR/Gy=22.5; 95% CI, -26.5 to 71.5), and fine dust (ERR/dust-year=0.0012; 95% CI, -0.0020 to 0.0043). Limitations of the study were the lack of data on potential confounders, including Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, smoking, socioeconomic status, and other occupational exposures (eg, asbestos, diesel engine exhaust), as well as an uncertainty in exposure assessment, such as from possibly drinking arsenic-containing water (Kreuzer et al, 2012).

Genotoxicity

    A) Arsenic induced DNA damage in human cells.
    B) Conflicting genetic effects have been found for arsenicals. Chromosome aberrations were elevated in the white blood cells of persons exposed to arsenic and possibly other substances (Nordenson, 1978) Burgdorf et al, 1977), but sister chromatid exchanges were not (Friberg et al, 1986). Sodium arsenite did induce sister chromatid exchanges in vitro, however (Friberg et al, 1986).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Testing must be correlated with the time of exposure and care must be taken to eliminate possible confounding factors such as food-derived arsenic (fish) or accumulated arsenic in those with chronic renal failure.
    B) Diagnosis is based on elevated urinary arsenic levels. A spot urine may be done as a screen prior to chelation but arsenic excretion is intermittent, therefore a 24-hour urine arsenic collection is necessary for definitive diagnosis. A 24-hour urinary arsenic collection exceeding 100 mcg is usually abnormal, even after chelation.
    C) Monitor CBC, serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, renal function tests, and a blood arsenic concentration in symptomatic patients.
    D) Serial ECGs should be obtained to follow the QTc interval and continuous cardiac monitoring should be instituted in symptomatic patients.
    E) Most arsenic compounds are radio-opaque, therefore abdominal X-rays may confirm acute ingestions and guide decontamination.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) ACUTE TOXICITY
    1) A blood level of arsenic less than 7 mcg/100 mL (70 mcg/L) is considered in the normal range. Blood levels are highly variable and may be useful only after acute exposure to confirm diagnosis (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    2) HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: were found to have highly elevated arsenic levels in serum and packed cells compared with age-matched historical controls: mean levels were 11.5 ng As/mL versus 0.38 ng/mL for serum and 9.5 ng As/g versus 3.17 ng/g for packed cells (DeKimpe et al, 1993).
    B) HEMATOLOGY
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY: The following findings were reported following chronic arsenic exposure: leucocytosis followed by leucopenia with depressed neutrophils; thrombocytopenia; rapidly decreasing hemoglobin indicating hemolytic anemia or GI bleed; aplastic anemia; basophilic stippling of erythrocytes; macrocytosis. Also, a reduction in hemoglobin concentration, reduction in total cell counts, and a rise of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and hemoglobin mass (MCH), indicating an alteration of heme biosynthetic pathways were present (Rahman et al, 2001).
    C) BIOCHEMISTRY
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Monitor hepatic and renal function. Elevated serum creatinine transaminases and bilirubin, and depressed haptoglobin levels have been reported following chronic arsenic exposure. Liver histology has shown cirrhosis and noncirrhotic portal fibrosis (Rahman et al, 2001).
    D) OTHER
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Obtain a skin biopsy as indicated. Carcinomatous changes or Bowen's disease have been described following chronic arsenic exposure (Rahman et al, 2001).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) 24-Hour Levels: Even with chelation an unexposed individual should not have more than 100 mcg per 24-hour total urine output.
    a) Concentrations of arsenic in 24-hour urine in a male agricultural worker exposed to arsenic from the immersion of his foot in a storage container of concentrated arsenic acid ranged from a high of 2,500 mcg to a low of 160 mcg (McWilliams, 1989).
    2) SEAFOOD: Urinary arsenic may be elevated up to 0.2 to 1.7 mg/L within 4 hours after eating some seafoods containing organoarsenical compounds (Baselt, 1997).
    a) Mussels gave significant elevations of urinary monomethyl- and dimethylarsonic acid, while ray, cod, and place did not (Buchet et al, 1994).
    b) In order to accurately determine urinary arsenic levels, patients should abstain from consuming seafood for 72 to 96 hours prior to urine collection. Also, with samples that contain elevated total arsenic concentrations, laboratories should perform speciation (determination of arsenic as organic or inorganic) prior to reporting results (Kales et al, 2006).
    3) VARIATION: In Michigan from 1985 to 1991, 7% of arsenic poisoned patients had some visible signs of arsenic poisoning. Sampled urine arsenic levels ranged from below detection to 198,000 mcg/L, with 36% having greater than 200 mcg/L (Kuslikis et al, 1991).
    4) PORPHYRIN EXCRETION: One study reported that no increase in urinary porphyrin excretion was found in a chronically arsenic exposed human population; however, the coproporphyrin/uroporphyrin ratio was observed to be reversed in most exposed individuals due to both an increase in uroporphyrin excretion and a decrease in coproporphyrin excretion. In a study of patients exposed to arsenic in drinking water (0.4 milligrams/liter), reduced coproporphyrin III excretion and increased uroporphyrin excretion were found as compared with subjects whose drinking water contained 0.020 milligrams/liter of arsenic (Garcia-Vargas et al, 1994).
    5) A study by the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in Lodz, Poland assessed the relationship between inhalation exposure and urinary excretion of total inorganic arsenic in copper smelting workers. According to the findings, daily exposure to arsenic concentrations of 10 mcg/m(3) and 50 mcg/m(3) led to concentrations of inorganic arsenic metabolites of about 30 mcg/L and 70 mcg/L, respectively (International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1998).
    6) CHRONIC TOXICITY: proteinuria, hematuria and pyuria have been reported following chronic arsenic exposure (Rahman et al, 2001).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) HAIR
    a) HAIR/NAIL: Arsenic has been demonstrated in hair and nails within hours after exposure (Lander et al, 1965). NOTE: Hair is continually exposed to the external environment and the presence of a chemical may not be indicative of inhalational or oral exposure.
    b) Normal concentration of arsenic in hair and nails is less than 1 mg/kg (Baselt, 1997).
    c) Many commercial laboratories performing hair analyses for consumers have not been shown to yield consistent and reliable results (Barrett, 1985).
    d) If hair is sent for arsenic quantitation, pubic hair instead of scalp hair should be sent because of the possibility of scalp hair being contaminated with arsenic from the environment (Jenkins, 1966).
    e) A comparison of the mean air arsenic concentrations of each occupational exposure group with corresponding arsenic levels in fingernails was highly correlated (Agahian et al, 1990).
    f) In a Finnish population, hair arsenic content correlated well with chronic or past exposure to arsenic in drinking water. Hair arsenic concentration increased 0.1 mg/kg for each increase of 10 mcg/L of arsenic in drinking water or 10 to 20 mcg/day of arsenic intake (Kurttio et al, 1998).
    2) EXFOLIATED BLADDER CELLS
    a) Persons exposed to high levels of arsenic in drinking water had a significantly increased presence of micronuclei in exfoliated bladder cells, even when exposures were near the USA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 50 mcg of arsenic per liter of water (or 100 mcg in a 24-hour urine) (Moore et al, 1997; Rahman et al, 2001).
    3) SWEAT CHLORIDE LEVEL
    a) A sweat chloride test is a diagnostic test for cystic fibrosis. An elevated sweat chloride level will indicate dysfunction of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which is a protein that acts as a chloride channel to regulate fluid transport in the lung and pancreas, as well as other organs. Cell culture studies have demonstrated that arsenic can also cause CFTR degradation.
    1) A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the association between measurement of sweat chloride levels and arsenic toxicity. The study evaluated 30 participants that were previously in the group with arsenic-related lesions that was part of a case-control study from 2001 to 2003 and 70 participants who were the control patients of that same case control study. Arsenic levels and sweat conductivity were measured in all patients. Of the 100 participants, 11 participants had sweat chloride levels that were diagnostic for cystic fibrosis, at 60 mmol/L or greater; however, none of the 11 participants had a genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis. Current arsenic levels in drinking water and in fingernails were significantly higher in the participants with sweat conductivity greater than 60 mmol/L than for the participants with normal or intermediate sweat conductivity (median, 11.9 mcg/L vs 2.7 mcg/L, p=0.01; and median 5.64 mcg/g vs 1.39 mcg/g, p=0.008, respectively), indicating that elevated sweat chloride levels can occur with arsenic exposure and in the absence of cystic fibrosis (Mazumdar et al, 2015).
    4) OTHER
    a) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Other diagnostic studies which may be beneficial (based on a patient's clinical presentation) include: ultrasonography of the abdomen, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, lung function tests, nerve conduction studies (Rahman et al, 2001).

Radiographic Studies

    A) ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
    1) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected (Hilfer & Mendel, 1962; Gousios & Adelson, 1959; Lee et al, 1995).

Methods

    A) OTHER
    1) Quantitative 24-hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning.
    2) Blood arsenic or spot urine arsenic levels have not correlated with chronic occupational exposure to cacodylic acid (dimethylarsenic acid) among forestry workers (Wagner & Weswig, 1974).
    3) A method for a quick spot test of the urine (Reinsch test) has been described (Grande et al, 1987) but its clinical utility is uncertain.
    4) One study reported a method of analyzing inorganic arsenic based on urinary concentration and speciation of arsenic. This technique can distinguish between occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic and dietary exposure to inert organoarsenicals in seafood (Farmer & Johnson, 1990).
    5) Arsenic can be measured in human urine by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method (Amarasiriwardena et al, 1998).
    6) A short-column liquid chromatography with hydride generation atomic fluorescence detection method can measure and speciate nanogram/mL quantities of arsenite, arsenate, monomethylarsonic acid, and dimethylarsinic acid within 3 minutes (Le & Ma, 1998).
    7) Arsenic can be speciated into inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonate, and dimethylarsenate in human urine with an hydride cold-trapping technique (Ng et al, 1998).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All patients with acute arsenic toxicity should be admitted.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a medical toxicologist and/or poison center for all potentially significant arsenic exposures.

Monitoring

    A) Testing must be correlated with the time of exposure and care must be taken to eliminate possible confounding factors such as food-derived arsenic (fish) or accumulated arsenic in those with chronic renal failure.
    B) Diagnosis is based on elevated urinary arsenic levels. A spot urine may be done as a screen prior to chelation but arsenic excretion is intermittent, therefore a 24-hour urine arsenic collection is necessary for definitive diagnosis. A 24-hour urinary arsenic collection exceeding 100 mcg is usually abnormal, even after chelation.
    C) Monitor CBC, serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, renal function tests, and a blood arsenic concentration in symptomatic patients.
    D) Serial ECGs should be obtained to follow the QTc interval and continuous cardiac monitoring should be instituted in symptomatic patients.
    E) Most arsenic compounds are radio-opaque, therefore abdominal X-rays may confirm acute ingestions and guide decontamination.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) PREHOSPITAL: Remove the contaminated clothing and wash the patient thoroughly.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Activated charcoal does not bind arsenic well. Gastric lavage and whole bowel irrigation should be considered for confirmed significant ingestions.
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Aggressive decontamination with gastric lavage is recommended. If X-ray demonstrates arsenic in the lower GI tract, whole bowel irrigation should be considered. Activated charcoal may not bind significant amounts, but is recommended until definitive quantitative data are available. Fluid repletion should be begun as soon as possible.
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION (WBI)
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    D) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Preliminary results suggest that activated charcoal may not be of therapeutic value in the treatment of acute arsenic poisoning (Al-Mahasneh QM & Rodgers GC, 1990).
    a) One study has reported no significant adsorption to activated charcoal, but specific quantities bound were not stated (Mitchell et al, 1989).
    b) Sodium arsenite (0.65 millimolar) and sodium arsenate (1.7 millimolar) were NOT adsorbed to activated charcoal (in a ratio of 1:10) to any measurable extent in an aqueous acidic solution (simulated gastric juice) that was incubated at 37 degrees C for 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes in an in vitro model (Al-Mahasneh QM & Rodgers GC, 1990).
    c) Solutions incubated for 120 and 240 minutes at pH 10 to 12 (simulated intestinal juices) showed adsorption of 75% to 80% (Al-Mahasneh QM & Rodgers GC, 1990).
    E) ENDOSCOPY
    1) Endoscopic removal of adherent arsenic was performed in an adult with acute arsenic poisoning. Attempts to remove arsenic from the stomach were unsuccessful, but colonoscopy was reported successful in removal of arsenic from the ascending colon(Duenas-Laita et al, 2005).
    F) GASTROTOMY
    1) Gastrotomy with manual removal of adherent arsenic was performed on a patient with persistent evidence of a radio-opaque mass in the stomach, despite gastric lavage and attempted endoscopic removal, after acute arsenic poisoning(Duenas-Laita et al, 2005). It is unclear how much arsenic was removed.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Testing must be correlated with the time of exposure and care must be taken to eliminate possible confounding factors such as food-derived arsenic (fish) or accumulated arsenic in those with chronic renal failure.
    2) Diagnosis is based on elevated urinary arsenic levels. A spot urine may be done as a screen prior to chelation but arsenic excretion is intermittent, therefore a 24-hour urine arsenic collection is necessary for definitive diagnosis. A 24-hour urinary arsenic collection exceeding 100 mcg is usually abnormal, even after chelation.
    3) Monitor CBC, serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, renal function tests, and a blood arsenic concentration in symptomatic patients.
    4) Serial ECGs should be obtained to follow the QTc interval and continuous cardiac monitoring should be instituted in symptomatic patients.
    5) Most arsenic compounds are radio-opaque, therefore abdominal X-rays may confirm acute ingestions and guide decontamination.
    B) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) The use of chelation therapy depends on the clinical condition of the patient and arsenic concentrations in urine, hair, or nails. Begin chelation therapy immediately in a severely ill patient with known or suspected acute arsenic poisoning (Ford, 2006).
    2) In general, parenteral chelation therapy should be initiated in patients with significant acute exposures (any patient with gastrointestinal symptoms after acute exposure or history of a deliberate or significant ingestion ingestion). Either intramuscular dimercaprol (BAL) or intravenous unithiol can be used, depending on availability. When the patient is able to tolerate oral medications, BAL can be replaced with succimer with no waiting period between treatments. If unithiol is used, therapy may be changed to the oral route after the fifth day if the patient's condition permits.
    3) END POINT: Repeat courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 mcg/L (Ford, 2006).
    C) DIMERCAPROL
    1) Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects.
    2) DOSE: The dose used is dependent on the severity of the patient's symptoms and the urinary arsenic levels.
    a) DIMERCAPROL/BAL IN OIL: INDICATIONS: Used for the treatment of mercury (inorganic and elemental), arsenic, and gold poisoning. It is also used in combination with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection to treat patients with severe lead poisoning (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Dimercaprol is contraindicated in methyl mercury poisoning (Howland, 2002; Clarkson, 1990).
    b) MILD ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 2.5 mg/kg 4 times daily for 2 days, 2 times on the third day, and once daily thereafter for 10 days. SEVERE ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 3 mg/kg every 4 hours for 2 days, 4 times on the third day, then twice daily thereafter for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    c) MERCURY POISONING: DOSE: 5 mg/kg initially, then 2.5 mg/kg 1 or 2 times daily for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    d) ACUTE LEAD ENCEPHALOPATHY: DOSE: 4 mg/kg is given alone in the first dose and thereafter at 4-hour intervals with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection administered at a separate site. For less severe poisoning, dimercaprol dose can be decreased to 3 mg/kg after the first dose. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only. Continue the treatment for 2 to 7 days depending on clinical response (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Therapy is generally switched to a less toxic oral chelator as soon as tolerated.
    e) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Common effects include pain at the injection site and fever (especially in children). Other effects include hypertension, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, headache, burning sensations of the mouth and throat, a sensation of constriction in the throat, chest, or hands, conjunctivitis, lacrimation, salivation, tingling of the extremities, diaphoresis, abdominal pain, and anxiety. Dimercaprol injection contains peanut oil. Avoid in patients with peanut allergy (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Adverse effects are dose related; they develop in 1% of patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, 14% of patients receiving 4 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours and 65% of patients receiving 5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours (Eagle & Magnuson, 1946).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: It is generally contraindicated in patients with hepatic insufficiency, with the exception of postarsenical jaundice (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). May cause hemolysis in G6PD deficient patients. BAL metal chelate disassociates in acid environment; urinary alkalinization is usually recommended. Do not administer with iron therapy as BAL iron complex may cause vomiting (Howland, 2002).
    3) EFFICACY
    a) CHILDREN: BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948). It has also been reported to effect complete recovery in a woman and her 20-week fetus after an acute ingestion of inorganic arsenic by the mother (Daya et al, 1989).
    b) ANIMALS: BAL has been shown to reduce the organ deposition of arsenic in a rabbit model using subcutaneous injections of Lewisite at the LD10 and LD40 and 4 doses of BAL of 35 mg/kg each (Snider et al, 1990).
    D) SUCCIMER
    1) INDICATIONS: Succimer is an orally administered chelator approved for use in children with lead poisoning (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2005). Succimer has been efficacious in children and adults with arsenic poisoning (Cullen et al, 1995; Fournier et al, 1988; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Lenz et al, 1981).
    2) SUCCIMER/DOSE/ADMINISTRATION
    a) PEDIATRIC: Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval is then increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless blood lead concentrations indicate the need for prompt retreatment.
    2) Succimer capsule contents may be administered mixed in a small amount of food (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) ADULT: Succimer is not FDA approved for use in adults, however it has been shown to be safe and effective when used to treat adults with poisoning from a variety of heavy metals (Fournier et al, 1988a). Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval then is increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless the patient's symptoms or blood concentrations indicate a need for more prompt treatment (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    3) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) The manufacturer recommends monitoring liver enzymes and complete blood count with differential and platelet count prior to the start of therapy and at least weekly during therapy (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) Succimer therapy did not worsen preexisting borderline abnormal liver enzyme levels in a prospective evaluation of 15 children with lead poisoning (Kuntzelman & Angle, 1992).
    4) SUCCIMER/ADVERSE EFFECTS: The following adverse events have occurred in children and adults during clinical trials: nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; transient liver enzyme elevations; rash, pruritus; drowsiness and paresthesia. Events reported infrequently include: sore throat, rhinorrhea, mucosal vesicular eruption, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia, and mild to moderate neutropenia (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    5) ODOR: Succimer has a sulfurous odor that may be evident in the patient's breath or urine (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2005).
    6) HYPERTHERMIA: One adult developed acute severe hyperthermia associated with hypotension; rechallenge resulted in hyperthermia with shaking chills and hypertension (Marcus et al, 1991).
    7) AVAILABLE FORMS: Succimer (Chemet (R)), 100 mg capsules (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    8) EFFICACY
    a) Succimer has been shown to have a safety ratio of 20 times greater than BAL. The total dosage of BAL is limited by its intrinsic toxicity, and the greater safety ratio of succimer allows for longer and more prolonged dosing of succimer (Inns & Rice, 1993).
    b) CHRONIC ENVIRONMENTAL ARSENIC POISONING: In a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, succimer was NOT EFFICACIOUS in improving a clinical scoring system, skin lesions, or various biochemical laboratory measurements when administered to patients in India with chronic arsenic poisoning from drinking contaminated groundwater (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    c) CASE REPORT: In a patient treated with succimer (30 mg/kg/day for 5 days) for long-term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal excretion of arsenic increased 1.5-fold (Fournier et al, 1988).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman developed progressive weakness and peripheral neuropathy leading to quadriplegia and requiring mechanical ventilation following an unknown type of exposure to arsenic. Analysis of her serum and urine revealed elevated arsenic (As) concentrations (290 mcg As/kg [normal less than 2 mcg/kg] and 2000 mcg As/L [normal less than 10 mcg/L], respectively). Despite succimer therapy, 10 mg/kg administered 3 times daily for a total of 33 days over a 45-day period, the patient only showed slow clinical improvement with continued residual paresthesias and weakness in her hands and distal lower extremities 5 years following intoxication(Stenehjem et al, 2007).
    e) CASE REPORT: An intravenous preparation of succimer was used to treat a 26-year-old man with multi organ system failure after acute trivalent arsenic overdose. A solution was prepared with 1.6 grams of succimer diluted in 50 mL of sterile water and titrated with 10 N NaOH to pH 7.2 to 7.4 and filtered through a 0.22 micron filter. The solution was administered in 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution as an infusion over 1 hour at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 5 days followed by 10 mg/kg/day. The succimer solution was also given via peritoneal dialysis, 20 milligrams/liter of dialysate with 12 L exchanged daily for 5 days (Hantson et al, 1995).
    E) PENICILLAMINE
    1) USUAL ADULT DOSE
    a) 1 to 1.5 g/day given orally in 4 divided doses (Nelson, 2011).
    2) USUAL PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 15 to 30 mg/kg/day in 3 to 4 divided doses. Initially, a small dose may be given to minimize side effects and then increased gradually (eg, 25% of the desired dose in week 1, 50% in week 2, and the full dose by week 3) (Caravati, 2004; Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    3) Patients allergic to penicillin products may have cross-sensitivity to penicillamine (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    4) Monitor for proteinuria and hematuria; heavy metals may also cause renal toxicity (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    5) Monitor CBC with differential, platelet count, and hepatic enzymes (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    6) COMMON SIDE EFFECTS/CHRONIC DOSING: Fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, proteinuria, and myalgia(Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    a) SERIOUS ADVERSE EFFECTS: Nephrotic syndrome, hypersensitivity reactions, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and various autoimmune responses (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009; Feehally et al, 1987; Kay, 1986).
    7) Penicillamine is considered FDA pregnancy category D(Prod Info CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, 2004); it should be avoided if possible in pregnant patients.
    8) Use of penicillamine throughout pregnancy has been associated with connective tissue abnormalities, hydrocephalus, cerebral palsy, cardiac and great vessel anomalies, webbing of fingers and toes, and arthrogryposis multipex (Linares et al, 1979; Solomon et al, 1977; Anon, 1981; Beck et al, 1981; Rosa, 1986). However, the teratogenic effect when used in low doses or for short periods of time, as in metal chelation, has yet to be determined.
    9) EFFICACY
    a) CHILDREN: D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977; Kuruvilla et al, 1975; Watson et al, 1981).
    b) ANIMALS: In an experimental animal model, mice and guinea pigs were injected subcutaneously with 8.4 milligrams/kilogram arsenic trioxide and 30 minutes later 0.7 millimole/kilogram (104.5 milligrams/kilogram) of d-penicillamine was administered. D-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in this model (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    F) UNITHIOL
    1) EFFICACY
    a) SUMMARY: Unithiol (DMPS) is used in Europe as a chelating agent for heavy metal poisonings (Kruszewska et al, 1996). It appears to be an effective chelator of arsenic in experimental animals (Inns et al, 1990; Kreppel et al, 1990; Aposhian et al, 1984; Hsu et al, 1983; Aposhian et al, 1981) and humans (Goebel et al, 1990; Kew et al, 1993; Moore et al, 1994a; Zilker et al, 1999).
    b) INTRAVENOUS DOSING: The dosing regimen depends on the severity of poisoning (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) IV, IM injection, 2004). See UNITHIOL MANAGEMENT for further information.
    c) DMPS/INDICATIONS: Chelating agent for heavy metal toxicities associated with arsenic, bismuth, copper, lead and mercury (Blanusa et al, 2005).
    d) DMPS/DOSING
    1) ACUTE TOXICITY
    a) ADULT ORAL DOSE:
    1) 1200 to 2400 mg/day in equally divided doses (100 to 200 mg 12 times daily) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    b) ADULT INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    1) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    2) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    3) First 24 hours: 250 mg intravenously every 3 to 4 hours (1500 to 2000 mg total).
    4) Day two: 250 mg intravenously every 4 to 6 hours (1000 to 1500 mg total).
    5) Day three: 250 mg intravenously every 6 to 8 hours (750 to 1000 mg total).
    6) Day four: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 12 hours (500 to 750 mg total).
    7) Subsequent days: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (250 to 750 mg total).
    8) Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route.
    c) PEDIATRIC ORAL DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005):
    1) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    2) Initial dose: 20 to 30 mg/kg/day orally in many equal divided doses.
    3) Maintenance dose: 1.5 to 15 mg/kg/day.
    d) PEDIATRIC INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    1) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    2) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    3) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    4) First 24 hours: 5 mg/kg intravenously every four hours (total 30 mg/kg).
    5) Day two: 5 mg/kg intravenously every six hours (total 20 mg/kg).
    6) Days three and four: 5 mg/kg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (total 5 to 15 mg/kg).
    2) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    a) ADULT DOSE
    1) 300 to 400 mg/day orally (in single doses of 100 to 200 mg). The dose may be increased in severe toxicity (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    3) DMPS/ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) Chills, fever, and allergic skin reactions such as itching, exanthema or maculopapular rash are possible (Hla et al, 1992; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). Cardiovascular effects such as hypotension, nausea, dizziness or weakness may occur with too rapid injection of DMPS. Hypotensive effects are irreversible at very high doses (300 mg/kg) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013).
    e) SOURCES
    1) DMPS is not FDA-approved, but is available outside of the US from Heyl Chem-pharm Fabrik in Germany (Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). In the US it may be obtained from some compounding pharmacies.
    f) CASE SERIES/CHRONIC TOXICITY: In a small (n=10) prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind study of untreated patients with chronic arsenicosis following groundwater contamination, unithiol treatment was found to improve some clinical parameters (i.e., weakness, pigmentation and lung disease), and to increase total urinary excretion of arsenic. The treatment dose was 100 mg unithiol (orally) given four times per day for 1 week and repeated in the 3rd, 5th and 7th week of the study (Mazumder et al, 2001).
    g) CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old woman developed arsenic poisoning as evidenced by a 1.5 year-history of peripheral neuropathy, pancytopenia, ventricular tachycardia, skin rash, and nail changes. Laboratory data revealed a blood arsenic concentration of 5.6 mcg/dL. Despite administration of succimer, the neuropathy continued to progress to facial paresis, severe weakness in all 4 extremities, and respiratory failure. Succimer was then discontinued, and unithiol was initiated at a dosage regimen of 250 mg IV every 4 hours. Twenty-four hours after beginning unithiol therapy, urinary excretion of arsenic increased to 300 mcg/L from a baseline of 101 mcg/L. Within 48 hours, the patient's neuropathy improved and, 10 days later, she was discharged in a wheelchair. At her 3-month follow-up, the patient continued to have residual paresthesias and weakness in her lower extremities, but she was able to walk without assistance, and by 1 year she was back at work with mild residual weakness and paresthesiae(Wax & Thornton, 2000a).
    G) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Hypotension from acute arsenic ingestion is likely due to intravascular volume depletion from vomiting, diarrhea, or third spacing of fluids.
    2) The initial treatment should consist of adequate volume replacement with crystalloid, with the addition of blood products in patients with significant gastrointestinal blood loss. Place the patient supine until hypotension is corrected.
    3) Aggressive monitoring of volume status should be undertaken even in the absence of hypotension initially. Bladder catheterization to monitor hourly urine output, a central venous catheter, or a Swan-Ganz catheter should be used as clinically warranted.
    4) Pressors should be used only if volume replacement does not reverse the hypotension.
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    H) TACHYCARDIA
    1) Tachycardia may be a response to hypovolemia and should be treated initially with fluid replacement as clinically warranted.
    I) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY
    a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    2) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/INDICATIONS
    1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek et al, 2010).
    b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    3) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    J) TORSADES DE POINTES
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Withdraw the causative agent. Hemodynamically unstable patients with Torsades de pointes (TdP) require electrical cardioversion. Emergent treatment with magnesium (first-line agent) or atrial overdrive pacing is indicated. Detect and correct underlying electrolyte abnormalities (ie, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia). Correct hypoxia, if present (Drew et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010; Keren et al, 1981; Smith & Gallagher, 1980).
    b) Polymorphic VT associated with acquired long QT syndrome may be treated with IV magnesium. Overdrive pacing or isoproterenol may be successful in terminating TdP, particularly when accompanied by bradycardia or if TdP appears to be precipitated by pauses in rhythm (Neumar et al, 2010). In patients with polymorphic VT with a normal QT interval, magnesium is unlikely to be effective (Link et al, 2015).
    2) MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    a) Magnesium is recommended (first-line agent) for the prevention and treatment of drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) even if the serum magnesium concentration is normal. QTc intervals greater than 500 milliseconds after a potential drug overdose may correlate with the development of TdP (Charlton et al, 2010; Drew et al, 2010). ADULT DOSE: No clearly established guidelines exist; an optimal dosing regimen has not been established. Administer 1 to 2 grams diluted in 10 milliliters D5W IV/IO over 15 minutes (Neumar et al, 2010). Followed if needed by a second 2 gram bolus and an infusion of 0.5 to 1 gram (4 to 8 mEq) per hour in patients not responding to the initial bolus or with recurrence of dysrhythmias (American Heart Association, 2005; Perticone et al, 1997). Rate of infusion may be increased if dysrhythmias recur. For persistent refractory dysrhythmias, a continuous infusion of up to 3 to 10 milligrams/minute in adults may be given (Charlton et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 25 to 50 milligrams/kilogram diluted to 10 milligrams/milliliter for intravenous infusion over 5 to 15 minutes up to 2 g (Charlton et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Use with caution in patients with renal insufficiency.
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: High doses may cause hypotension, respiratory depression, and CNS toxicity (Neumar et al, 2010). Toxicity may be observed at magnesium levels of 3.5 to 4.0 mEq/L or greater (Charlton et al, 2010).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respiratory rate, motor strength, deep tendon reflexes, serum magnesium, phosphorus, and calcium concentrations (Prod Info magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, 2009).
    3) OVERDRIVE PACING
    a) Institute electrical overdrive pacing at a rate of 130 to 150 beats per minute, and decrease as tolerated. Rates of 100 to 120 beats per minute may terminate torsades (American Heart Association, 2005). Pacing can be used to suppress self-limited runs of TdP that may progress to unstable or refractory TdP, or for override refractory, persistent TdP before the potential development of ventricular fibrillation (Charlton et al, 2010). In a case series overdrive pacing was successful in terminating TdP associated with bradycardia and drug-induced QT prolongation (Neumar et al, 2010).
    4) POTASSIUM REPLETION
    a) Potassium supplementation, even if serum potassium is normal, has been recommended by many experts (Charlton et al, 2010; American Heart Association, 2005). Supplementation to supratherapeutic potassium concentrations of 4.5 to 5 mmol/L has been suggested, although there is little evidence to determine the optimal range in dysrhythmia (Drew et al, 2010; Charlton et al, 2010).
    5) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) Isoproterenol has been successful in aborting torsades de pointes that was resistant to magnesium therapy in a patient in whom transvenous overdrive pacing was not an option (Charlton et al, 2010) and has been successfully used to treat torsades de pointes associated with bradycardia and drug induced QT prolongation (Keren et al, 1981; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol may have a limited role in pharmacologic overdrive pacing in select patients with drug-induced torsades de pointes and acquired long QT syndrome (Charlton et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol should be avoided in patients with polymorphic VT associated with familial long QT syndrome (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) DOSE: ADULT: 2 to 10 micrograms/minute via a continuous monitored intravenous infusion; titrate to heart rate and rhythm response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Correct hypovolemia before using; contraindicated in patients with acute cardiac ischemia (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    1) Contraindicated in patients with preexisting dysrhythmias; tachycardia or heart block due to digitalis toxicity; ventricular dysrhythmias that require inotropic therapy; and angina. Use with caution in patients with coronary insufficiency (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: Tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmias, palpitations, hypotension or hypertension, nervousness, headache, dizziness, and dyspnea (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respirations and central venous pressure to guide volume replacement (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    6) OTHER DRUGS
    a) Mexiletine, verapamil, propranolol, and labetalol have also been used to treat TdP, but results have been inconsistent (Khan & Gowda, 2004).
    7) AVOID
    a) Avoid class Ia antidysrhythmics (eg, quinidine, disopyramide, procainamide, aprindine), class Ic (eg, flecainide, encainide, propafenone) and most class III antidysrhythmics (eg, N-acetylprocainamide, sotalol) since they may further prolong the QT interval and have been associated with TdP.
    K) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    2) Unithiol (DMPS, dimercaptopropanesulfonic acid) may be superior in the treatment of neuropathy (Wax & Thornton, 2000; Moore et al, 1994)
    3) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    L) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) MELARSOPROL ENCEPHALOPATHY: Only 4 percent of those patients given corticosteroids (prednisolone, not more than 40 milligrams daily) developed melarsoprol encephalopathy compared to approximately 33 percent in those patients receiving no steroids in a prospective randomized trial involving 600 patients with parasitology-confirmed Trypanosoma brucei gambiense infections (Pepin et al, 1989).
    2) In one study, nonspecific edema and weight gain were common (86% of patients) using doses of 10 milligrams daily, and were frequently associated with pleural or pericardial effusion. The onset of edema was 4 to 24 days and it tended to correlate with leukocytosis. Dexamethasone was ineffective as treatment, and symptoms subsided with continuation of arsenic trioxide following reductions in white count (Huang et al, 1998).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    8) Refer to TREATMENT/ORAL EXPOSURE section for more information.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION
    1) SYSTEMIC TOXICITY: No cases of systemic arsenic poisoning following only eye exposure have been reported.
    2) CONSULTATION: If significant eye irritation is present, prolonged initial flushing and early ophthalmologic consultation are advisable.
    3) Refer to TREATMENT/ORAL EXPOSURE section for more information.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids or antihistamines.
    2) Workers with significant arsenical dermatitis, ulcerations, or dermatoses may be overexposed and may need to be precluded from further exposure.
    3) Refer to TREATMENT/ORAL EXPOSURE section for more information.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Arsenic is poorly dialyzable. Hemodialysis should only be considered for arsenic toxicity accompanied by renal failure (Giberson et al, 1976).
    2) Hemodialysis was ineffective in a fatal case of ingestion of 2 grams of arsenic trioxide 26 hours prior to receiving medical attention (Levin-Scherz et al, 1987). The maximum amount of arsenic possibly removed by hemodialysis in this case was 2.9 milligrams. In a second case where greater than 1000 mg of arsenic trioxide was ingested, two courses of hemodialysis removed only 3.5 and 1.8 mg of arsenic (Mahieu et al, 1981).
    3) CASE REPORTS: A 19-year-old woman and a 62-year-old man each ingested 1.8 g of arsenic trioxide. In the female patient, renal arsenic clearance was calculated at 21.5 L/hr with 94 mg total arsenic excretion over 72 hours. The male patient experienced severe renal failure requiring prolonged dialysis. Arsenic clearance was estimated at 0.9 L/hr by dialysis with 23 mg total arsenic excretion over 99 hours (Blythe & Joyce, 2001). In another study, arsenic clearance of 2.25 L/hr by hemodialysis was reported. These findings suggest that dialysis is unlikely to be beneficial in patients with normal renal function (Hantson et al, 2003).
    4) Mathieu et al (1992) report the effect of hemodialysis and dimercaprol on arsenic kinetics following an ingestion of 10 grams of sodium arsenate (40 to 50 percent arsenic) (Mathieu et al, 1992). During the 15 days of hospitalization, 235 milligrams of arsenic was eliminated in the urine.
    a) Instantaneous hemodialysis clearance was 85 +/- 75 milliliters/minute without previous BAL and 87.5 +/- 75 milliliters/minute with a previous 250 milligram BAL injection.
    b) BAL: 250 milligrams was given one time only at approximately 20 hours postingestion.
    c) One month after discharge the patient was admitted to another hospital for a sensory and motor polyneuritis involving both upper and lower limbs. Arsenic concentrations in blood and urine were not detectable, however, BAL was administered for 8 days at this institution. All neurologic signs resolved over 3 months.
    5) In another study, Zilker et al (1999) reported that hemodialysis and CAVHDF did not significantly alter arsenic kinetics in a 24-year-old man who had accidentally ingested arsenic residue with an initial serum arsenic level of 245.8 micrograms/liter (Zilker et al, 1999). Dimercaptopropane sulfonate (DMPS) 1.2 grams was also given during the first two days of enhanced elimination therapy. During the first 87 hours following admission, 89.67 mg of arsenic was recovered in the urine, while the first hemodialysis removed 0.168 mg of arsenic and 0.061 mg was found in the CAVHDF dialysate.
    a) Renal function remained normal throughout the period, and the authors suggested that unithiol was an effective therapy for arsenic poisoning when no kidney failure was present. One limitation of the study, however, was that no urinary levels were obtained prior to unithiol treatment.
    6) Dialysis clearance rates of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980).
    7) Hemodialysis was instituted 4 hours postadmission in a 30-year-old man who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing arsenous oxide 1.5 percent (approximately 2,150 milligrams of metallic arsenic) although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    8) Hemodialysis and continuous arterio-venous hemodiafiltration were found to remove negligible amounts of arsenic in an adult who maintained normal renal function after poisoning with arsenic (Zilker et al, 1999).
    B) PLASMAPHERESIS/ERYTHROCYTE APHERESIS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 4-year-old child presented with abdominal pain and vomiting after ingesting an unknown amount of a chromated copper arsenate wood preservative containing 13.3% chromium, 7.8% copper, and 11.3% arsenic. Fulminant liver and kidney failure were reported the next day. The patient's initial blood arsenic concentration, obtained 3 days post-ingestion, was 206 mcg/L. Sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate was administered intravenously in order to increase the urinary excretion of arsenic; however, liver transplantation was considered the only viable option. In order to extract as much as possible the amount of protein and erythrocyte-bound arsenic and minimize the risk of toxicity to the transplanted liver, plasmapheresis and erythrocyte apheresis were performed, however, the blood arsenic concentration could not be reduced by plasmapheresis and was only reduced by 11% with erythrocyte apheresis. Liver transplantation was successful and the patient recovered uneventfully (Breuer et al, 2015).

Case Reports

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INGESTION: A 30-year-old man survived an ingestion of 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing arsenous oxide 1.5% (equivalent to 2150 mg metallic arsenic) with aggressive fluid resuscitation, chelation therapy, and hemodialysis (instituted prior to evidence of renal insufficiency) (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    2) INGESTION: A 22-year-old woman in the 20th week of pregnancy ingested 340 mg of arsenic in a suicide attempt. She presented to the emergency room 2 hours postingestion and had vomited once. Treatment included ipecac, activated charcoal, cathartic, and chelation therapy with dimercaprol (BAL; 150 mg). Chelation therapy continued and was reduced slowly as the 24-hour urinary arsenic level fell from an initial 3030 mcg/L to less than 200 mcg/L. No clinical signs of neurological, gastrointestinal, or renal toxicity were observed and the remainder of the pregnancy was normal. The patient, with a 24-hour arsenic level of less than 50 mcg/L, delivered a normal baby (Daya et al, 1989).
    3) INGESTION: A 2-year-old girl ingested 1 ounce of sodium arsenate 2.27% with almost immediate onset of diarrhea and vomiting. The patient was lavaged. She was pale and lethargic and continued to have gastrointestinal symptoms. Sinus tachycardia was noted with heart rate up to 200. She received 2 mg/kg BAL. In 12 hours she was asymptomatic and was started on oral d-penicillamine. She was discharged on day 6 and continued d-penicillamine as an outpatient. Baseline urine arsenic level was 4880 mcg/L on day 1.
    a) Patient was re-admitted on day 9 with a urine arsenic level of 650 mcg/L and a rash. D-penicillamine was discontinued and DMSA therapy was initiated. After 4 more days her urine arsenic level had dropped to 96 mcg/L. Excretion half-life was 2.5 days. DMSA may be preferred therapy over d-penicillamine due to its efficacy and lower adverse events profile (Wolf et al, 1993).
    4) ROUTE OTHER (PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION): A study reported the case of acute arsenic poisoning in a 23-year-old agricultural worker whose foot was accidently immersed in concentrated arsenic acid. He continued to be in direct contact with the saturated clothing for 8 hours. The patient incurred second- to third-degree burns. Dense white lines in the subcutaneous tissue, thought to be metallic arsenic, were observed through x-ray. Over the 8 weeks following exposure, 24-hour urine levels ranged from 2500 mg to 160 mg. Acute encephalopathy was present at 5 days, and at 21 days after exposure a painful motor neuropathy developed. Dimercaprol (BAL) was administered once followed by penicillamine treatment for 2 months. Recovery was hampered by drug abuse (McWilliams, 1989).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic than pentavalent arsenic (arsenate). Acute ingestion of more than 100 mg of inorganic arsenic is likely to cause significant toxicity. Airborne concentrations of 5 mg As/m(3) are considered immediately dangerous to life and health.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) Different arsenic compounds may have differing lethal dosages.
    2) Arsine gas at a concentration of 25-50 ppm is believed to be lethal within thirty minutes (Baselt, 2000).
    3) The smallest recorded lethal dose of arsenic is approximately 130 mg (Bingham et al, 2001; OHM/TADS , 2001).
    4) As little as 20 mg of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity (Hutton & Christians, 1983; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Zaloga et al, 1970).
    5) RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW: According to a retrospective review of 155 patients with corrosive arsenic based depilatory (CABD) agent poisoning, 9 patients died following a mean ingestion of 213 +/- 141 g of the CABD powder. While the formulation of these products in not standardized, analysis of CABD has shown that it consists of approximately 25% arsenic sulfide and 65% calcium bicarbonate (Farzaneh et al, 2011).
    B) ADULT
    1) CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old man died from hypovolemia, acute circulatory failure and refractory ventricular dysrhythmias following the ingestion of a wood preservative which contained arsenic pentoxide (45%), chromium trioxide (35%), and cupric oxide (20%). The patient died within several hours of ingestion (Hay et al, 2000).
    C) CHILD
    1) CHILD: One mg/kg of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child (Alexander, 1964; Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 4-month-old ingested 190 mg (14.6 mg/kg) of arsenic and died 36 hours later despite aggressive resuscitation and chelation (Lai et al, 2005).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) AVERAGE DAILY HUMAN INTAKE OF ARSENIC: 0.025-0.033 mg/kg (in food and water) (Baselt, 2000).
    b) Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of arsenic compounds range from 1 mg to 10 g.
    c) As little as 10 ppm in water may be an acute health hazard (OHM/TADS , 2001).
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) ADULT
    1) A 30-year-old man survived an ingestion of 6 ounces of "Blue Ball Rat Killer" containing 1.5 percent arsenous oxide (2150 mg metallic arsenic per 6 ounces), ethanol, and intranasal cocaine use with aggressive therapy (fluid resuscitation, chelation therapy, and hemodialysis) (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    2) LACK OF EFFECT: A 32-year-old woman developed only epigastric discomfort and paresthesias in the lower extremities following ingestion of about 2 grams of sodium arsenate; urine arsenic level was 14 mg/L about 13 hours postingestion (Hernandez et al, 1998).
    3) A 45-year-old woman survived an ingestion of sodium arsenite between 8 and 16 g (serum arsenic concentration was 300 mcg/L on admission). Residual quadriplegia did occur (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    b) PEDIATRIC
    1) A 16-year-old girl developed vomiting, agitation, abdominal pain, generalized weakness, and paresthesias after intentionally ingesting up to 240 mL of an herbicide containing 47% monosodium methylarsonate. The patient's condition improved following chelation therapy; however, mild paresthesia in her hands and feet continued to persist at her 6-week follow-up (Roth et al, 2011).
    2) A 3-year-old boy experienced 3 episodes of vomiting after ingesting 5 mL of an herbicide containing 47.6% monosodium methylarsonate. An ECG demonstrated sinus tachycardia (114 bpm). He received dimercaptosuccinic acid for the next 15 days. Other than the initial episodes of vomiting, the patient remained asymptomatic throughout his hospital stay and at his follow-up exam 10 days post-discharge (Roth et al, 2011).
    B) CASE SERIES
    1) PEDIATRIC
    a) A group of Japanese infants (n=381) developed arsenic poisoning after consuming dried milk powder contaminated with arsenic, with the occurrence of a variety of clinical effects, including fever, diarrhea, vomiting, hepatomegaly, abnormal ECG findings, and skin manifestations, including pigmentation, rash, and desquamation, with long-term sequelae of mental retardation and epilepsy. Analysis of the dried milk powder determined that the arsenic concentration to be 4 to 7 mg/L. Based on data from patients whose diet consisted only of the dried milk, and estimating that the critical dose causing the toxicity was approximately 5 cans of milk powder (ie, 5 pounds of dried milk), the total ingested dose of arsenic was calculated to be approximately 60 mg (Dakeishi et al, 2006).
    C) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    1) PENTAVALENT ARSENIC
    a) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenates) by several orders of magnitude. However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.
    b) Of 149 cases of sodium arsenate-containing ant killer poisoning, 91 percent were exposed via the bait station. Most cases were children 3-years-old or younger. Symptoms of self-limiting episodes of vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 3 children (Kingston et al, 1989).
    c) Despite trivial or no symptoms (transient emesis) in children with a history of sodium arsenate ant killer ingestion, significant elevations in 24-hour urine arsenic levels occurred, in the range of 3500 to 5350 mcg/L (Scalzo et al, 1989).
    d) Decreases in the hemoglobin and hematocrit values were the only sequelae possibly associated with an acute ingestion of approximately 1.2 g of arsenic as sodium arsenate by a 44-year-old woman (Chan & Matthews, 1990).
    D) CHRONIC
    1) Subjects chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water at levels between 0.1 and 0.39 mg/L showed no difference in health effects as determined by questionnaire from subjects whose drinking water contained 0.001 mg/L of arsenic (Valentine et al, 1992).
    2) Prolonged ingestion of arsenicals at the rate of 0.04-0.09 mg/kg/day frequently produced mild poisoning (Hayes & Laws, 1991).
    3) The mountaineers of Styria were reported to ingest arsenic once or twice a week as a tonic, and consequently became tolerant of daily doses estimated at 400 mg or more (Hayes & Lawes, 1991).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) DISEASE STATE
    a) Hemodialysis patients had higher serum arsenic levels (2.3 to 79.8 ng/ml) than did normal subjects (0.132 to 4.783 ng/ml) in one study (Kimpe et al, 1993). Packed red blood cell arsenic levels were 2.1 to 68.4 ng/g and 0.51 to 14.44 ng/g for dialysis patients and controls respectively.
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Concentrations of arsenic in urine, blood, and gastric fluid after admission in a worker buried in arsenic trioxide for about 10 minutes were 1.9, 3.4, and 550 mg/L, respectively (Gerhardsson et al, 1988).
    b) Tissue concentrations in micrograms/gram wet weight of arsenic at autopsy of a worker who was buried for about 10 minutes in arsenic trioxide were brain (frontal cortex) 0.3, myocardium (left ventricle) 1.2, kidney (cortex) 1.4, lung (peripheral) 2.9, liver 3.8, and blood 2.3 (Gerhardsson et al, 1988).
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) A 3-year-old child had a blood arsenic concentration of 1.8 mg/L at 5.5 hours after accidental ingestion of approximately one mouthful of a 44% solution of sodium arsenite (Saady et al, 1989).
    b) A 25-year-old man who died after ingesting 8 g of di-arsenic-trioxide had a serum arsenic concentration of 0.15 mg/L the day of ingestion (Quatrehomme et al, 1992).
    c) A 45-year-old woman had an initial serum arsenic concentration of 300 mcg/L following an ingestion of sodium arsenite between 8 and 16 g. The patient survived with residual neurologic injury (i.e., quadriplegia) (Bartolome et al, 1999).
    d) A 54-year-old woman had a urine arsenic concentration of 83.6 mcg/g creatinine (normal <50 mcg/g creatinine) after chronically ingesting 2 to 4 kelp supplement tablets daily over a 1-year period (Amster et al, 2007).
    e) A 3-year-old boy ingested 5 mL of an herbicide containing 47.6% monosodium methylarsonate and had a blood arsenic concentration of 654.8 mcg/L, obtained 8 hours post-ingestion (Roth et al, 2011).
    f) Seven teenagers (ages ranging from 15 to 18 years) unintentionally ingested an unknown amount of herbicide containing 24% monosodium methanearsonate, mistakenly used as cooking oil. Their blood arsenic concentrations, obtained approximately 7 hours post-ingestion, ranged from 348 to 613 mcg/mL (Cox & Orledge, 2011).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7440-38-2 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Arsenic
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A1
    2) Codes: BEI
    3) Definitions:
    a) A1: Confirmed Human Carcinogen: The agent is carcinogenic to humans based on the weight of evidence from epidemiologic studies.
    b) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): Lung cancer
    d) Molecular Weight: 74.92
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    b) Adopted Value
    1) Arsenic and inorganic compounds, as As
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A1
    2) Codes: BEI
    3) Definitions:
    a) A1: Confirmed Human Carcinogen: The agent is carcinogenic to humans based on the weight of evidence from epidemiologic studies.
    b) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): Lung cancer
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7440-38-2 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Arsenic (inorganic compounds, as As)
    2) REL:
    a) TWA:
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling: 0.002 mg/m(3) [15-minute]
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Ca) NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s): See Appendix A,
    3) Listed as: Arsenic, organic compounds (as As)
    4) REL:
    a) TWA: none
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s):
    5) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 5 mg As/m3 (as As)
    b) Note(s): Ca
    1) Ca: NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A).

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7440-38-2 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A1 ; Listed as: Arsenic
    a) A1 :Confirmed Human Carcinogen: The agent is carcinogenic to humans based on the weight of evidence from epidemiologic studies.
    2) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A1 ; Listed as: Arsenic and inorganic compounds, as As
    a) A1 :Confirmed Human Carcinogen: The agent is carcinogenic to humans based on the weight of evidence from epidemiologic studies.
    3) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): A ; Listed as: Arsenic, inorganic
    a) A : Human Carcinogen.
    4) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 1 ; Listed as: Arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds
    a) 1 : The agent (mixture) is carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent (mixture) may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent (mixture) acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.
    5) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Ca ; Listed as: Arsenic (inorganic compounds, as As)
    a) Ca : NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    6) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Arsenic, organic compounds (as As)
    7) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 1 ; Listed as: Arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds: Metallic arsenic
    a) Category 1 : Substances that cause cancer in man and can be assumed to make a significant contribution to cancer risk. Epidemiological studies provide adequate evidence of a positive correlation between the exposure of humans and the occurence of cancer. Limited epidemiological data can be substantiated by evidence that the substance causes cancer by a mode of action that is relevant to man.
    8) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 1 ; Listed as: Arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds
    a) Category 1 : Substances that cause cancer in man and can be assumed to make a significant contribution to cancer risk. Epidemiological studies provide adequate evidence of a positive correlation between the exposure of humans and the occurence of cancer. Limited epidemiological data can be substantiated by evidence that the substance causes cancer by a mode of action that is relevant to man.
    9) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): K ; Listed as: Arsenic Compounds, Inorganic
    a) K : KNOWN = Known to be a human carcinogen

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS7440-38-2 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Arsenic, inorganic compounds (as As); see 29 CFR 1910.1018
    2) Table Z-1 for Arsenic, inorganic compounds (as As); see 29 CFR 1910.1018:
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    3) Listed as: Arsenic, organic compounds (as As)
    4) Table Z-1 for Arsenic, organic compounds (as As):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 0.5
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: ITI, 1995 OHM/TADS, 2001 RTECS, 2001
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 46,200 mcg/kg -- ataxia, gastrointestinal hypermotility, diarrhea
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 25-47 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    b) 145 mg/kg -- ataxia, gastrointestinal hypermotility, diarrhea
    3) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 13,390 mcg/kg
    4) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 15 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    b) 112 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    c) 763 mg/kg -- ataxia, gastrointestinal hypermotility, diarrhea

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Inorganic arsenic reduces cellular apoptosis via damage of mitochondrial membranes and down-regulation of BCL2, a pro-survival protein. Arsenic is actively transported into Trypanosomes by a purine transporter resulting in inhibition of trypanothione production and subsequent parasite lysis (Ford, 2006).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Trivalent arsenic disrupts oxidative phosphorylation, leading to free radical formation via inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which subsequently decreases gluconeogenesis due to lack of acetyl-CoA. Pentavalent arsenic may be transformed to arsenic or substitute for inorganic phosphate in glycolysis, leading to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and loss of ATP formation. Chronically, arsenic may cause DNA damage, mutation in the p-53 suppressor gene, and inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms leading to cancer. Arsenic-containing metals are considered non-toxic due to their low solubility. Organic arsenic has relatively low toxicity when compared to the inorganic trivalent and pentavalent forms (Ford, 2006).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Arsenic is a silver-gray or tin-white, shiny, brittle, crystalline and metallic-looking element. It can exist in three allotropic forms: yellow (alpha), black (beta), and gray (gamma) (HSDB , 2001).
    B) Rarely is arsenic found in its isolated, elemental form; more commonly, it is present in mineral species, in alloys, or as an oxide or other compound form (Budavari, 2000).
    C) The amorphous metalloid form (alpha-arsenic) will darken to black (beta-arsenic) and form arsenic trioxide (As203) in moist air. When arsenic vapor is cooled suddenly, a yellow modification of arsenic which has no metallic properties is formed. This yellow arsenic can be converted back to the gray arsenic with very short exposure to ultraviolet light (ACGIH, 1996; (Budavari, 2000; Hathaway et al, 1996; Lewis, 1992; Lewis, 1996; NIOSH , 2001).
    D) Arsenic has low thermal and electrical conductivity (ITI, 1995).
    E) It is essentially odorless and tasteless (HSDB , 2001).
    1) However, arsine gas is noted as having a garlic-like odor (Bingham et al, 2001).

Molecular Weight

    A) 74.92 (RTECS , 2001)

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) Currently not available (CHRIS , 2002)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) SIGNS - Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea, and abdominal pain.
    11.1.5) EQUINE/HORSE
    A) Onset of signs is usually sudden and severe. Digestive tract irritation, increased fluid content of the bowel, and increased digestive tract motility are the result of arsenic induced damage to the epithelial structures. Excessive fluid loss causes dehydration, hypotension, and shock (Oehme, 1987).
    B) Some horses show no signs of digestive tract irritation or diarrhea before they die of circulatory failure (Oehme, 1987).
    C) Liver and kidney damage may occur if the horse survives the acute effects of arsenic (Oehme, 1987).
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) SIGNS - Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea, and abdominal pain.

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) DOGS/CATS
    a) Induce emesis with Syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    b) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liters), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or milk of magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    c) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.
    d) Unabsorbed arsenic in the digestive tract of the horse will bind to orally administered sodium thiosulfate for eventual excretion in the feces (Oehme, 1987).
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) DOGS/CATS
    1) Dimercaprol (BAL) 3 mg/kg IM every 4 hours for 2 days, then four times daily on day 3, and then twice daily until day 10. Supportive fluid and electrolyte therapy.
    B) LARGE ANIMALS
    1) Prevent dehydration by administering fluid and electrolyte therapy.
    2) Dimercaprol (BAL): 3 mg/kg IM. Repeat every 4 hours for 2 days, then four times daily on 3rd day, and then twice daily until day 10. Supportive fluid and electrolyte therapy. d-Penicillamine: 11 mg/kg four times daily for 7 to 10 days orally.
    3) Thiotic acid appears beneficial at 50 mg/kg IM at 8-hour intervals to treat inorganic arsenical toxicosis (Howard, 1986).

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) HORSE
    1) The estimated lethal dose of arsenic in a horse ranges from 1 to 25 mg/kg of body weight (Oehme, 1987).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) DOGS/CATS
    a) Induce emesis with Syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    b) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liters), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or milk of magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    c) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.
    d) Unabsorbed arsenic in the digestive tract of the horse will bind to orally administered sodium thiosulfate for eventual excretion in the feces (Oehme, 1987).

Sources

    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) There are multiple sources of arsenic on farms. Arsenic will remain in the ash of burned arsenic-containing materials (Oehme, 1987).

Other

    A) OTHER
    1) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    a) LABORATORY
    1) POSTMORTEM - Liver and kidney tissues with arsenic concentrations of greater than 10 parts per million, on a wet weight basis, are diagnostic (Oehme, 1987).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 2000.
    14) ACGIH: 1996 Supplements to the Sixth Edition of the ACGIH Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1996a.
    15) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 5th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1986.
    16) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Vol 1, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    17) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    18) ATSDR: Toxicological Profile for Arsenic, TP 92/02, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
    19) Aballay LR, Diaz Mdel P, Francisca FM, et al: Cancer incidence and pattern of arsenic concentration in drinking water wells in Cordoba, Argentina. Int J Environ Health Res 2012; 22(3):220-231.
    20) Agahian B, Lee JS, & Nelson JH: Arsenic levels in fingernails as a biological indicator of exposure to arsenic. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1990; 51:646-651.
    21) Ahasan HA: Complications of chronic arsenic poisoning. Trop Doct 2001; 31:28-29.
    22) Al-Mahasneh QM & Rodgers GC: An in vitro study of efficacy of activated charcoal as an adsorbent for arsenical salts (Abstract). International Congress on Clinical Toxicology, Poison Control and Analytical Toxicology, LUXTOX 90, Programme and Abstracts (May 2-5) Luxembourg, 1990.
    23) Alexander RL: Acute arsenic poisoning in children. OK State Med Assoc J 1964; 57:98-99.
    24) Amarasiriwardena CJ, Lupoli N, & Potula V: Determination of the total arsenic concentration in human urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy: A comparison of the accuracy of three analytical methods. Analyst 1998; 123:441-445.
    25) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    26) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    27) Amster E, Tiwary A, & Schenker MB: Case report: potential arsenic toxicosis secondary to herbal kelp supplement. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115(4):606-608.
    28) Anon: Cutis laxa and other congenital defects with penicillamine, ADR Highlights (Division of drug experience), Rockville, MD, 1981, pp 1-4-81-21.
    29) Anon: Drugs for parasitic infections. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1993; 35:111-122.
    30) Anon: Health hazards of inorganic arsenic, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, 1979.
    31) Aposhian HV, Carter DE, & Hoover TD: DMSA, DMPS, and DMPA -- as arsenic antidotes. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1984; 4:S58-S70.
    32) Aposhian HV, Tadlock CH, & Moon TE: Protection of mice against the lethal effects of sodium arsenite -- a quantitative comparison of a number of chelating agents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1981; 61:385-392.
    33) Apostoli P, Guisti S, & Bartoli D: multiple exposure to arsenic, antimony, and other elements in art glass manufacturing. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34:65-72.
    34) Appel KE, Hildebrandt AG, & Bannasch P: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1984; 116:232-236.
    35) Arbeitsgruppe BGVV: Allgemeine und spezielle Massnahmen bei Vergiftungen und bei Drogennotfaellen. Empfehlungen der Kommission "Erkennung und Behandlung von Vergiftungen", Bundesinstituts fuer gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinaermedizin, Berlin, Germany, 1996.
    36) Arbouine MW & Wilson HK: The effect of seafood consumption on the assessment of occupational exposure to arsenic by urinary arsenic speciation measurements. J Trace Elem Electr Hlth Dis 1992; 6:153-160.
    37) Arrighi HM & Hertzpicciotto I: Controlling the healthy worker survivor effect -- an example of arsenic exposure and respiratory cancer. Occupat Environ Med 1996; 53:455-462.
    38) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    39) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 1994.
    40) Azcue JM & Nriagu JO: Arsenic forms in mine-polluted sediments of Moira-Lake, Ontario. Environ Internat 1993; 19:405-415.
    41) Balali-Mood M, Adel MH & Nassiri Z et al: Acute deliberate mixed arsenic and calcium hydroxide poisoning (Abstract). International Congress on Clinical Toxicology, Poison Control and Analytical Toxicology, LUXTOX 90, Programme and Abstracts (May 2-5), 1990.
    42) Bansal SK, Haldar N, & Dhand UK: Phrenic neuropathy in arsenic poisoning. Chest 1991; 100:878-880.
    43) Barrett S: Commercial hair analysis: science or scam?. JAMA 1985; 254:1041-1045.
    44) Bartolome B, Cordoba S, & Nieto S: Acute arsenic poisoning: clinical and histopathological features. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141:1106-1109.
    45) Barton A & McLean B: An unusual case of peripheral neuropathy possibly due to arsenic toxicity secondary to excessive intake of dietary supplements. Ann Clin Biochem 2013; 50(Pt 5):496-500.
    46) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 3rd ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 1997.
    47) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    48) Battista G, Bartoli D, & Iaia TE: Art glassware and sinuonasal cancers: Report of three cases. Am J Ind Med 1996; 30:31-35.
    49) Baxley MN: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1981; 26:749-756.
    50) Beaudoin AR: Teratology 1974; 10:153-158.
    51) Beck RB, Rosenbaum KN, & Byers PH: Ultrastructural findings in fetal penicillamine syndrome, 14th March of Dimes Ann Birth Defects Conf, San Diego, CA, 1981.
    52) Beckett WS, Moore JL, & Keogh JP: Acute encephalopathy due to occupational exposure to arsenic. Br J Ind Med 1986; 43:66-67.
    53) Beckman KJ, Bauman JL, & Pimental PA: Arsenic-induced torsade de pointes. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:290-292.
    54) Belluck DA, Benjamin SL, Baveye P, et al: Widespread arsenic contamination of soils in residential areas and public spaces: An emerging regulatory or medical crisis?. Int J Toxicol 2003; 22:109-128.
    55) Bingham E, Chorsson B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, Vol 2. 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001.
    56) Blanusa M, Varnai VM, Piasek M, et al: Chelators as antidotes of metal toxicity: therapeutic and experimental aspects. Curr Med Chem 2005; 12(23):2771-2794.
    57) Blythe D & Joyce DA: Clearance of arsenic by haemodialysis after acute poisoning with arsenic trioxide. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27(1):334-.
    58) Boonchai W: Treatment of precancerous and cancerous lesions of chronic arsenicism with 5% imiquimod cream. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142(4):531-532.
    59) Bourrain JL, Morin C, & Beani JC: Airborne contact dermatitis from cacodylic acid. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38:364-365.
    60) Brayer AF, Callahan CM, & Wax PM: Acute arsenic poisoning from ingestion of "snakes". Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:394-396.
    61) Breuer C, Oh J, Nolkemper D, et al: Successful detoxification and liver transplantation in a severe poisoning with a chemical wood preservative containing chromium, copper, and arsenic. Transplantation 2015; 99(4):e29-e30.
    62) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    63) Brown KG & Beck BD: Arsenic and bladder cancer mortality. Epidemiology 1996; 7:557-558.
    64) Buchet JP & Lison D: Mortality by cancer in groups of the Belgian population with a moderately increased intake of arsenic. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1998; 71:125-130.
    65) Buchet JP, Lison D, & Ruggeri M: Assessment of exposure to inorganic arsenic, a human carcinogen, due to the consumption of seafood. Arch Toxicol 1996; 70:773-778.
    66) Buchet JP, Pauwels J, & Lauwerys R: Assessment of exposure to inorganic arsenic following ingestion of marine organisms by volunteers. Environ Res 1994; 66:44-51.
    67) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed. on CD-ROM. Version 12:3a. Chapman & Hall/CRCnetBASE. Whitehouse Station, NJ. 2000.
    68) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    69) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    70) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    71) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    72) Caravati EM: D-Penicillamine. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    73) Carbonell-Barrachina A, Burlo F, & Valero D: Arsenic toxicity and accumulation in turnip as affected by arsenic chemical speciation. J Agric Food Chem 1999; 47:2288-2294.
    74) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    75) Chakraborti D, Mukherjee SC, Saha KC, et al: Arsenic toxicity from homeopathic treatment. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41:963-967.
    76) Chan KM & Matthews WS: Acute arsenic overdose. Lab Med 1990; 21:649-652.
    77) Chang CC, HO SC, Tsai SS, et al: Ischemic heart disease mortality reduction in an arseniasis-endemic area in southwestern Taiwan after a switch in the tap-water supply system. J Toxicol Environ Health 2004; 67:1353-1361.
    78) Charlton NP , Lawrence DT , Brady WJ , et al: Termination of drug-induced torsades de pointes with overdrive pacing. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28(1):95-102.
    79) Chen CJ, Chen CW, & Wu MM: Cancer potential in liver, lung, bladder and kidney due to ingested inorganic arsenic in drinking water. Br J Cancer 1992; 66:888-892.
    80) Chen CJ, Hsueh YM, & Lai MS: Increased prevalence of hypertension and long-term arsenic exposure. Hypertension 1995; 25:53-60.
    81) Chen CJ, Kuo TL, & Wu MM: Arsenic and cancers (Letter). Lancet 1988; 1:414-415.
    82) Chen CL, Hsu LI, Chiou HY, et al: Ingested arsenic, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk. JAMA 2004; 292:2984-2990.
    83) Chen JG , Chen YG , Zhou YS , et al: A follow-up study of mortality among the arseniasis patients exposed to indoor combustion of high arsenic coal in Southwest Guizhou Autonomous Prefecture, China. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2007a; 81(1):9-17.
    84) Chen Y, Factor-Litvak P, Howe GR, et al: Arsenic exposure from drinking water, dietary intakes of B vitamins and folate, and risk of high blood pressure in Bangladesh: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165(5):541-552.
    85) Chiou HY, Hsueh YM, & Liaw KF: Incidence of internal cancers and ingested inorganic arsenic: a seven-year follow-up study in Taiwan. Cancer Res 1995; 55:1296-1300.
    86) Chiou HY, Hyang WI, & Su CL: Dose-response relationship between prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and ingested inorganic arsenic. Stroke 1997; 28:1717-1723.
    87) Chu HA & Crawford-Brown DJ: Inorganic arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a meta-analysis for dose-response assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2006; 3(4):316-322.
    88) Clarkson TW: Mercury - an element of mystery (editorial). N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1137-1138.
    89) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Volume 2C, Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, pp 1913-1925.
    90) Concha G, Vogler G, & Nermell B: Low-level arsenic excretion in breast milk of native Andean women exposed to high levels of arsenic in the drinking water. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1998; 71:42-46.
    91) Coronado-Gonzalez JA, Del Razo,LM, Garcia-Vargas G, et al: Inorganic arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Environ Res 2007; 104(3):383-389.
    92) Council on Scientific Affairs: Effects of toxic chemicals on the reproductive system. JAMA 1985; 253:3431-3437.
    93) Cox RD & Orledge J: Inadvertent poisoning of seven teenagers with monosodium methanearsonate. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011; 49(3):167-170.
    94) Cullen NM, Wolf LR, & St Clair D: Pediatric arsenic ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13:432-435.
    95) Cuzick J, Sasieni P, & Evans S: Ingested arsenic, keratoses, and bladder cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136:417-421.
    96) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    97) Dakeishi M, Murata K, & Grandjean P: Long-term consequences of arsenic poisoning during infancy due to contaminated milk powder. Environ Health 2006; 5:31-.
    98) Dalal B, Gangopadhyay PK, Mukherjee AK, et al: Identification of indicators of arsenic induced nephrotoxicity in humans. Internet J Toxicol 2008; 5(2):1-.
    99) Das D, Chatterjee A, & Mandal BK: Arsenic in groundwater in six districts of West Bengal, India: The biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part 2. Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people. Analyst 1995; 120:917-924.
    100) Datta DV: Arsenic in opium (Letter). Lancet 1977; 1:484.
    101) Daya MR, Irwin R, & Parshley MC: Arsenic ingestion in pregnancy (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:347.
    102) DeKimpe J, Cornelis R, & Mees L: More than a tenfold increase of arsenic in serum and packed cells of chronic hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 1993; 13:429-434.
    103) DeSesso JM, Jacobson CF, & Scialli AR: An assessment of the developmental toxicity of inorganic arsenic. Reprod Toxicol 1998; 12:385-433.
    104) Dong JT & Luo XM: Arsenic-induced DNA-strand breaks associated with DNA protein crosslinks in human fetal lung fibroblasts. Mutat Res 1993; 302:97-102.
    105) Dong JT & Luo XM: Effects of arsenic on DNA damage and repair in human fetal lung fibroblasts. Mutat Res 1994; 315:11-15.
    106) Donofrio PD, Wilbourn AJ, & Albers JW: Acute arsenic intoxication presenting as Guillain-Barre'-like syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1987; 10:114-120.
    107) Donofrio PD, Wilbourn AJ, & Albers JW: Acute arsenic intoxication presenting as Guillain-Barre-like syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1987a; 10:114-120.
    108) Dragun J: The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, 1988.
    109) Drew BJ, Ackerman MJ, Funk M, et al: Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(9):934-947.
    110) Duenas C, Perez-Alverez JC, & Busteros JI: Idiopathic portal hypertension and angiosarcoma associated with arsenical salts therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998; 26:303-305.
    111) Duenas-Laita A, Perez-Miranda M, Gonzalez-Lopez MA, et al: Acute arsenic poisoning. Lancet 2005; 365:1982.
    112) Dulout FN, Grillo CA, & Seoane AI: Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes from native Andean women and children from Northwestern Argentina exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Mutat Res 1996; 370:151-158.
    113) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    114) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    115) Eagle H & Magnuson HJ: The systemic treatment of 227 cases of arsenic poisoning (encephalitis, dermatitis, blood dyscrasia, jaundice, fever) with 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). Am J Syph Gonor Ven Dis 1946; 30:420-441.
    116) Engel RR & Receveur O: Arsenic ingestion and internal cancers -- a review. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138:896-897.
    117) Engel RR & Smith AH: Arsenic in drinking water and mortality from vascular disease: an ecological analysis in 30 counties in the United States. Arch Environ Health 1994; 49:418-427.
    118) Enterline PE, Day R, & Marsh GM: Cancers related to exposure to arsenic at a copper smelter. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52:28-32.
    119) Enterline PE, Marsh GM, & Esmen NA: Some effects of cigarette smoking, arsenic, and SO2 on mortality among US copper smelter workers. J Occup Med 1987; 29:831-838.
    120) Espinoza EO, Mann MJ, & Bleasdell B: Arsenic and mercury in traditional chinese herbal balls (Letter). N Engl J Med 1995; 333:803-804.
    121) Farmer JG & Johnson LR: Assessment of occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic based on urinary concentrations and speciation of arsenic. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:342-348.
    122) Farzaneh E, Mostafazadeh B, Zamani N, et al: Depilatory Agents intoxication and factors contributing to its mortality: a 9-year review. Hum Exp Toxicol 2011; 30(10):1454-1457.
    123) Feehally J, Wheeler DC, Mackay EH, et al: Recurrent acute renal failure with interstitial nephritis due to D-penicillamine. Renal Failure 1987; 10:55-57.
    124) Ferm VH: Arch Environ Health 1971; 22:557-560.
    125) Fernandez MI, Lopez JF, Vivaldi B, et al: Long-term impact of arsenic in drinking water on bladder cancer health care and mortality rates 20 years after end of exposure. J Urol 2012; 187(3):856-861.
    126) Fernandez-Sola J, Nogue S, & Grau JM: Acute arsenical myopathy: morphological description. Clin Toxicol 1991; 29:131-136.
    127) Feseke SK, St-Laurent J, Anassour-Sidi E, et al: Arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 2015; 35(4):63-72.
    128) Fesmire FM, Schauben JL, & Roberge RJ: Survival following massive arsenic ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:602-606.
    129) Fincher RME & Koerker RM: Long-term survival in acute arsenic encephalopathy. Follow-up using newer measures of electrophysiologic parameters. Am J Med 1987; 82:549-552.
    130) Ford M: Arsenic. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, Hoffman RS, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 8th. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp 1251-1264.
    131) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.
    132) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988a; 3:499-504.
    133) Freeman HM: Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1998.
    134) Freeman JW & Couch JR: Prolonged encephalopathy with arsenic poisoning. Neurology 1978; 28:853-855.
    135) Friberg L, Norberg GF, & Vouk V: Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, end ed, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, NY, 1986.
    136) Frost F, Harter L, & Milham S: Lung cancer among women residing close to an arsenic emitting copper smelter. Arch Environ Health 1987; 42:148-152.
    137) Galbraith H, Lejune K, & Lipton J: Metal and arsenic impacts to soils, vegetation communities and wildlife habitat in southwest Montana uplands contaminated by smelter emissions: 1. Field evaluation. Environ Toxicol Chem 1995; 14:1895-1903.
    138) Garcia-Vargas GG, Del Razo LM, & Cebrian ME: Altered urinary porphyrin excretion in a human population chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:839-847.
    139) Garcia-Vargas GG, Garcia-Rangel A, & Aguilar-Romo M: A pilot study on the urinary excretion of porphyrins in human populations chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Human Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:189-193.
    140) Gerhardsson L, Dahlgren E, & Eriksson A: Fatal arsenic poisoning -- a case report. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14:130-133.
    141) Gerhardt RE, Crecelius EA, & Hudson JB: Moonshine-related arsenic poisoning. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140:211-213.
    142) Gerhardt RE, Hudson JB, & Rao RN: Chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis induced by arsenic poisoning. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:1267-1269.
    143) Germolec DR, Spalding J, & Yu HS: Arsenic enhancement of skin neoplasia by chronic stimulation of growth factors. Am J Pathol 1998; 153:1775-1785.
    144) Gherardi RK, Chariot P, & Vanderstigel M: Organic arsenic-induced guillain-barre-like syndrome due to melarsoprol: a clinical, electrophysiological, and pathological study. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13:637-645.
    145) Giberson A, Vaziri ND, & Mirahamadi K: Hemodialysis of acute arsenic intoxication with transient renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136:1303-1304.
    146) Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, et al (Eds): Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th. Permagon Press, New York, NY, 1990.
    147) Goebel HH, Schmidt PF, & Bohl J: Polyneuropathy due to acute arsenic intoxication: biopsy studies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1990; 49:137-149.
    148) Goldsmith S: Arsenic-induced atypical ventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:1096-1098.
    149) Golub MS, Macintosh MS, & Baumrind N: Developmental and reproductive toxicity of inorganic arsenic: Animal studies and human concerns. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B Crit Rev 1998; 1:199-241.
    150) Gonsebatt ME, Vega L, & Herrera LA: Inorganic arsenic effects on human lymphocyte stimulation and proliferation. Mutat Res 1992; 283:91-95.
    151) Gosselin RE, Smith RP, & Hodge HC: Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1984.
    152) Gousios AG & Adelson L: Electrocardiographic and radiographic findings in acute arsenic poisoning. Am J Med 1959; 659-663.
    153) Grande GA, Rogers AA, & Ling LJ: Urine spot test as guide to treatment in acute pentavalent arsenic ingestion. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:73-74.
    154) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    155) Greenberg C, Davies S, & McGowan T: Acute respiratory failure following severe arsenic poisoning. Chest 1979; 76:596-598.
    156) Guha Mazumda DN & Das Gupta J: Arsenic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. J Hepatol 1991; 13:376.
    157) Guha Mazumder DN, Chakraborty AK, & Ghosh A: Chronic arsenic toxicity from drinking tube well water in rural West Bengal. Bull World Health Organ 1988; 66:499-506.
    158) Guha Mazumder DN, Das Gupta J, & Chakraborty AK: Environmental pollution and chronic arsenicosis in South Calcutta. Bull World Health Organ 1992; 70:481-485.
    159) Guha Mazumder DN, Ghoshal UC, & Amal Santra A: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic-contaminated subsoil water. J Toxicol -- Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:683-690.
    160) Guo HR, Chiang HS, & Hu H: Arsenic in drinking water and incidence of urinary cancers. Epidemiol 1997; 8:545-550.
    161) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    162) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    163) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    164) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    165) Hafeman DM, Ahsan H, Louis ED, et al: Association between arsenic exposure and a measure of subclinical sensory neuropathy in Bangladesh. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47:778-784.
    166) Hahn I, Kline SA, & Howland MA: Chronic pediatric arsenic poisoning from pressure-treated wood burned in a fireplace (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:550-551.
    167) Hall JC & Harruff R: Fatal cardiac arrhythmia in a patient with interstitial myocarditis related to chronic arsenic poisoning. South Med J 1989; 82:1557-1560.
    168) Hanna CP, Tyson JF, & McIntosh S: Determination of inorganic arsenic and its organic metabolites in urine by flow-injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Clin Chem 1993; 39:1662-1667.
    169) Hantson P, Haufroid V, Buchet JP, et al: Acute arsenic poisoning treated by intravenous dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and combined extrarenal epuration techniques. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41(1):1-6.
    170) Hantson P, Mahieu P, & Lauwerys R: Tolerance of intravenous dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) therapy for acute arsenic poisoning (Abstract). Przegl Lek 1995; 52:175-176.
    171) Hantson P, Verellendumoulin C, & Libouton JM: Sister chromatid exchanges in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after ingestion of high doses of arsenicals. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1996; 68:342-344.
    172) Harbison RD: Hamilton & Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby-Year Books, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    173) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 3rd ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1991.
    174) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    175) Hay E, Derazon H, & Eisenberg Y: Suicide by ingestion of a CCA wood preservative. J Emerg Med 2000; 19:159-163.
    176) Hayes WJ & Lawes ER Jr: Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, Volume 1-3, Academic Press, Inc, Sand Deigo, CA, 1991.
    177) Hayes WJ Jr & Laws ER Jr: Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, 1-3, Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, 1991.
    178) Hayes WJ Jr: Pesticides Studied in Man, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1982.
    179) Heaven R, Duncan M, & Vukelja SJ: Arsenic intoxication presenting with macrocytosis and peripheral neuropathy, without anemia. ACTA Haematol 1994; 92:142-143.
    180) Hei TK, Liu SX, & Waldren C: Mutagenicity of arsenic in mammalian cells: Role of oxidative species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:8103-8107.
    181) Hemminki K: Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1980; 45:123-126.
    182) Hernandez AF, Schiaffino S, & Ballesteros JL: Lack of clinical symptoms in an acute arsenic poisoning: An unusual case. Vet Human Toxicol 1998; 40:344-345.
    183) Heyman A, Pfeiffer JB Jr, & Willett RW: Peripheral neuropathy caused by arsenical intoxication. A study of 41 cases with observations on the effects of BAL (2,3-dimercapto-propanol). N Engl J Med 1956; 254:401-409.
    184) Hilfer RJ & Mendel A: Acute arsenic intoxication diagnosed by roentgenograms. Report of a case with survival. N Engl J Med 1962; 266:663-664.
    185) Hiroki M & Yoshiwara Y: Arsenic fungi isolated from arsenic-polluted soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 1993; 39:237-243.
    186) Hla KK, Ashton CE, & Henry JA: Adverse effects from 2,3-dimercaptopropane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 13.
    187) Hood RD & Bishop SL: Arch Environ Health 1972; 24:62-65.
    188) Hopenhayn C, Bush HM, Bingcang A, et al: Association between arsenic exposure from drinking water and anemia during pregnancy. J Occup Environ Med 2006; 48(6):635-643.
    189) Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, & Fuchs A: Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiology 1996; 7:117-124.
    190) Hopenhaynrich C, Biggs ML, & Fuchs A: Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiol 1996; 7:117-124.
    191) Houser WC & Vitek RK: Arsenic intoxication with wine as likely source. Postgrad Med 1979; 66:225-226.
    192) Howard JL: Current Veterinary Therapy: Food Animal Practice 2, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
    193) Howland MA: Dimercaprol (BAL), in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    194) Hsieh FI, Hwang TS, Hsieh YC, et al: Risk of erectile dysfunction induced by arsenic exposure through well water consumption in Taiwan. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116(4):532-536.
    195) Hsu CA, Aposhian V, & Heydolph S: Optical isomers of 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonate: antidotal activity, in vitro and in vivo, against sodium arsenite. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 224:314-318.
    196) Huang S-Y, Chang C-S, Tang J-L, et al: Acute and chronic arsenic poisoning associated with treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1998; 103:1092-1095.
    197) Huang SY, Chang CS, & Tang JL: Acute and chronic arsenic poisoning associated with treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematology 1998a; 103:1092-1095.
    198) Huang YZ, Qian XC, & Wang GQ: Syndrome of endemic arsenism and fluorosis. Chin Med J 1992; 105:586-590.
    199) Hutton JT & Christians BL: Sources, symptoms, and signs of arsenic poisoning. J Fam Pract 1983; 17:423-426.
    200) Huyck KL, Kile ML, Mahiuddin G, et al: Maternal arsenic exposure associated with low birth weight in Bangladesh. J Occup Environ Med 2007; 49(10):1097-1104.
    201) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    202) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    203) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    204) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    205) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    206) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    207) IARC: Monograms on the Estimation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, 2, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1973, pp 48.
    208) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    209) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed, Vols 1 & 2, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
    210) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    211) Ihrig MM, Shalat SL, & Baynes C: A hospital-based acse-control study of stillbirths and environmental exposure to arsenic using an atmospheric dispersion model linked to a geographical information system. Epidemiol 1998; 9:290-294.
    212) Inns RH & Rice P: Efficacy of dimercapto chelating agents for the treatment of poisoning by percutaneously applied dichloro(2-chlorovinyl)arsine in rabbits. Human Exp Toxicol 1993; 12:241-246.
    213) Inns RH, Rice P, & Bright JE: Evaluation of the efficacy of dimercapto chelating agents for the treatment of systemic organic arsenic poisoning in rabbits. Hum Exp Toxicol 1990; 9:215-220.
    214) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    215) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    216) Jackson R & Grainge JW: Arsenic and cancer. Canad Med Assoc J 1975; 113:396-401.
    217) Jakobsson-Lagerkvist B, Soderberg H-A, & Nordberg GF: Biological monitoring of arsenic,, lead and cadmium in occupationally and environmentally exposed pregnant women. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19:50-53.
    218) James LF: Am J Vet Res 1966; 27:132-135.
    219) Jarup L & Pershagen G: Arsenic exposure, smoking and lung cancer in smelter workers -- a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134:545-551.
    220) Jarup L, Pershagen G, & Wall S: Cumulative arsenic exposure and lung cancer in smelter workers: a dose-response study. Am J Ind Med 1989; 15:31-41.
    221) Jenkins RB: Inorganic arsenic and the nervous system. Brain 1966; 89:479-498.
    222) Jensen GE & Olsen ILB: Occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic in woodworkers and taxidermists -- Air sampling and biological monitoring. J Environ Sci Part A Environ Sci Engineer Toxic Haz Substances Control 1995; A30:921-938.
    223) Kales S.N., Huyck K.L., & Goldman R.H.: Elevated urine arsenic: un-speciated results lead to unnecessary concern and further evaluations. J Anal Toxicol 2006; 30(2):80-85.
    224) Kantor HI & Levin PM: Am J Obstet Gynecol 1948; 56:370-374.
    225) Kapustka LA, Lipton J, & Galbraith H: Metal and arsenic impacts to soils, vegetation communities and wildlife habitat in southwest Montana uplands contaminated by smelter emissions: 2. Laboratory phytotoxicity studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 1995; 14:1905-1912.
    226) Kay A: European league against rheumatism study of adverse reactions to D-penicillamine. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25:193-198.
    227) Kelafant GA, Kasarskis EJ, & Horstman SW: Arsenic poisoning in central Kentucky -- a case report. Am J Ind Med 1993; 24:723-726.
    228) Keren A, Tzivoni D, & Gavish D: Etiology, warning signs and therapy of torsade de pointes: a study of 10 patients. Circulation 1981; 64:1167-1174.
    229) Kerr HD & Saryan LA: Arsenic content of homeopathic medicines. Clin Toxicol 1986; 24:451-459.
    230) Kew J, Morris C, & Aihie A: Arsenic and mercury intoxication due to Indian ethnic remedies. Br Med J 1993; 306:506-507.
    231) Khan IA & Gowda RM: Novel therapeutics for treatment of long-QT syndrome and torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol 2004; 95(1):1-6.
    232) Kim M & Nriagu J: Oxidation of arsenite in groundwater using ozone and oxygen. Sci Total Environ 2000; 247:71-79.
    233) Kim S, Takeuchi A, Kawasumi Y, et al: A Guillain-Barre syndrome-like neuropathy associated with arsenic exposure. J Occup Health 2012; 54(4):344-347.
    234) Kingston RL, Hall S, & Sioris L: Clinical observations and medical outcome in 149 cases of arsenate ant killer ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:581-591.
    235) Kingston RL, Hall SW, & Sioris LS: Clinical observation and medical outcome in 149 consecutive cases of ingestion of a sodium arsenate-containing ant killer (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:339.
    236) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    237) Kjeldsberg & Ward: Leukemia in arsenic poisoning. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:935.
    238) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    239) Kochhar TS, Howard W, & Hoffman S: Effect of trivalent and pentavalent arsenic in causing chromosome alterations in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Toxicol Lett 1996; 84:37-42.
    240) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    241) Kosnett MJ & Becker CE: Dimercaptosuccinic acid as a treatment for arsenic poisoning (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:462.
    242) Kreppel H, Reichl FX, & Forth W: Lack of effectiveness of D-penicillamine in experimental arsenic poisoning. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:1-5.
    243) Kreppel H, Reichl FX, & Szinicz L: Efficacy of various dithiol compounds in acute As2O3 poisoning in mice. Arch Toxicol 1990; 64:387-392.
    244) Kreuzer M, Straif K, Marsh JW, et al: Occupational dust and radiation exposure and mortality from stomach cancer among German uranium miners, 1946-2003. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69(3):217-223.
    245) Kruszewska S, Wiese M, & Kolacinski Z: The use of hemodialysis and 2,3-propanesulphonate (DMPS) to manage acute oral poisoning from a lethal dose of arsenic trioxide. Internat J Occup Environ Health 1996; 9:111-115.
    246) Kuntzelman DR & Angle CR: Abnormal liver function in childhood lead poisoning unaffected by DMSA (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:355.
    247) Kurttio P, Komulainen H, & Hakala E: Urinary excretion of arsenic species after exposure to arsenic present in drinking water. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1998; 34:297-305.
    248) Kuruvilla A, Bergeson PS, & Done AK: Arsenic poisoning in childhood. An unusual case report with special notes on therapy with penicillamine. Clin Toxicol 1975; 8:535-540.
    249) Kuslikis B, Maurer J, & Trestrail J: Acute human arsenate exposure in Michigan from 1985 to the present (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1991; 33:378.
    250) Kwok RK, Mendola P, Liu ZY, et al: Drinking water arsenic exposure and blood pressure in healthy women of reproductive age in Inner Mongolia, China. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007; 222(3):337-343.
    251) Kyle RA & Pease GL: Hematologic aspects of arsenic intoxication. N Engl J Med 1965; 273:18-23.
    252) Labadie H, Stoessel P, & Callard P: Hepatic venoocclusive disease and perisinusoidal fibrosis secondary to arsenic poisoning. Gastroenterology 1990; 99:1140-1143.
    253) Lagerkvist BJ & Zetterlund B: Assessment of exposure to arsenic among smelter workers: a five-year follow-up. Am J Ind Med 1994; 25:477-488.
    254) Lai MS, Hsueh YM, & Chen CJ: Ingested inorganic arsenic and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139:484-492.
    255) Lai MW, Boyer EW, Kleinman ME, et al: Acute arsenic poisoning in two siblings. Pediatrics 2005; 116:249-257.
    256) Lander H, Hodge PR, & Crisp CS: Arsenic in the hair and nails. Its significance in acute arsenical poisoning. J Forens Med 1965; 12:52-67.
    257) Le Quesne PM & McLeod JG: Peripheral neuropathy following a single exposure to arsenic. Clinical course in four patients with electrophysiological and histological studies. J Neurol Sci 1977; 32:437-451.
    258) Le XC & Ma M: Short-column liquid chromatography with hydride generation atomic fluorescence detection for the speciation of arsenic. Anal Chem 1998; 70:1926-1933.
    259) Lee DC, Roberts JR, & Kelly JJ: Whole-bowel irrigation as an adjunct in the treatment of radiopaque arsenic (Letter). Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13:244-245.
    260) Lee JJ, Kim YK, Cho SH, et al: Hemolytic anemia as a sequela of arsenic intoxication following long-term ingestion of traditional Chinese medicine. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19:127-129.
    261) Lee-Feldstein A: A comparison of several measures of exposure to arsenic. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129:112-124.
    262) Leechen SF, Gurr JR, & Lin IB: Arsenite enhances DNA double-strand breaks and cell killing of methyl methanesulfonate-treated cells by inhibiting the excision of alkali-labile sites. Mutat Res 1993; 294:21-28.
    263) Leist M, Casey R, & Caridi D: The management of arsenic wastes: problems and prospects. J Hazard Mater 2000; 76:125-138.
    264) Lenz K, Hruby K, & Druml W: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in human arsenic poisoning. Arch Toxicol 1981; 47:241-243.
    265) Lerda D: Sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) among individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Mutat Res 1994; 312:111-120.
    266) Levin-Scherz JK, Patrick JD, & Weber FH: Acute arsenic ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:702-704.
    267) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    268) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 1997.
    269) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed, 2, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 2000.
    270) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 8th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1992.
    271) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    272) Liao CM, Chen BC, Singh S, et al: Acute toxicity and bioaccumulation of arsenic in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) from a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Environ Toxicol 2003; 18(4):252-259.
    273) Lien HC, Tsai TF, & Lee YY: Merkel cell carcinoma and chronic arsenicism. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:641-643.
    274) Linares A, Zarranz JJ, & Rodrigues-Alarcon J: Reversible cutis laxa due to maternal d-penicillamine treatment. Lancet 1979; 2:43.
    275) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    276) Liou SH, Gu TL, & Chen CJ: Hypersensitivity to mitomycin C-induced sister chromatid exchange as a biomarker of past exposure to arsenic. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996; 5:103-107.
    277) Liu YT & Chen Z: A retrospective lung cancer mortality study of people exposed to insoluble arsenic and radon. Lung Cancer 1996; 14:S137-S148.
    278) Livaditou A, Alexiou G, & Floros D: Epithelioid angiosardcoma of the adrenal gland associated with chronic arsenical intoxication?. Path Res Pract 1991; 187:284-289.
    279) Lugo, Cassaty, & Palmisano: Acute maternal arsenic intoxication. Am J Dis Child 1969; 117:328.
    280) Lundstrom NG, Englyst V, Gerhardsson L, et al: Lung cancer development in primary smelter workers: a nested case-referent study. J Occup Environ Med 2006; 48(4):376-380.
    281) Lyytikainen M, Sormunun A, & Peraniemi S: Environmental fate and bioavailability of wood preservatives in freshwater sediments near an old sawmill site. Chemosphere 2001; 44:341-350.
    282) MMWR: Reduction of children's arsenic exposure following relocation - Mill Creek, Montana. MMWR: MMWR 1987; 36:505-507.
    283) Mackell MA, Poklis A, & Gantner GE: An unsuspected arsenic poisoning murder disclosed by forensic autopsy. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1985; 6:358-361.
    284) Mahieu P, Buchet JP, & Roels HA: The metabolism of arsenic in humans acutely intoxicated by As2O3. Its significance for the duration of BAL therapy. Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:1067-1075.
    285) Majid Cheraghali A, Haghqoo S, Shalviri G, et al: Fatalities following skin exposure to arsenic. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(8):965-967.
    286) Majumdar BK, Sen S, Guru S, et al: Pulmonary involvement in chronic arsenic poisoning from drinking contaminated ground-water. JAPI 2004; 52:395-400.
    287) Marcotrigiano GO & Storelli MM: Heavy metal, polychlorinated biphenyl and organochlorine pesticide residues in marine organisms: risk evaluation for consumers. Vet Res Commun 2003; 27 Suppl 1:183-195.
    288) Marcus S, Okose P, & Jennis T: Untoward effects of oral dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment for lead poisoning (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:376.
    289) Marcus SM: Survival after massive arsenic trioxide ingestion (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:481.
    290) Markell EK, Voge M & John DT: Medical Parasitology, 7th ed. WB Saunders Company, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.
    291) Marshall G, Ferreccio C, Yuan Y, et al: Fifty-year study of lung and bladder cancer mortality in Chile related to arsenic in drinking water. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99(12):920-928.
    292) Mathieu D, Mathieu-Nolf M, & Germain-Alonso M: Massive arsenic poisoning - effect of hemodialysis and dimercaprol on arsenic kinetics. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18:47-50.
    293) Mayer DR, Kosmus W, & Pogglitsch H: Essential trace elements in humans -- serum arsenic concentrations in hemodialysis patients in comparison to healthy controls. Biol Tr Elem Res 1993; 37:27-38.
    294) Mazumdar M, Christiani DC, Biswas SK, et al: Elevated sweat chloride levels due to arsenic toxicity. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(6):582-584.
    295) Mazumder DN, Das Gupta J, & Santra A: Chronic arsenic toxicity in West Bengal -- the worst calamity in the world. J Indian Med Assoc 1998; 96:4-7.
    296) Mazumder DN: Effect of drinking arsenic contaminated water in children. Indian Pediatr 2007; 44(12):925-927.
    297) Mazumder DNG, Chakraborty AK, & Ghose A: Chronic arsenic toxicity from drinking tubewell water in rural West Bengal. Bull World Health Organization 1988; 66:499-506.
    298) Mazumder DNG, De BK, & Santra A: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonate (DMPS) in therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic-contaminated water. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:665-674.
    299) Mazumder DNG, Steinmaus C, Bhattacharya P, et al: Bronchiectasis in persons with skin lesions resulting from arsenic in drinking water. Epidemiology 2005; 16(6):760-765.
    300) McDonald C, Hoque R, Huda N, et al: Risk of arsenic-related skin lesions in Bangladeshi villages at relatively low exposure: a report from Gonoshasthaya Kendra. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85(9):668-673.
    301) McWilliams ME: Accidental acute poisoning by a concentrated solution of arsenic acid from percutaneous absorption (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31(4):354.
    302) Meng ZQ: Effects of arsenic on DNA synthesis in human lymphocytes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1993; 25:525-528.
    303) Minamoto K, Mascie-Taylor CGN, Moji K, et al: Arsenic-contaminated water and extent of acute childhood malnutrition (wasting) in rural Bangladesh. Environ Sci 2005; 12(5):283-292.
    304) Mitchell RD, Walberg CB, & Gupta RC: In vitro adsorption properties of activated charcoal with selected inorganic compounds (Abstract). Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:444-445.
    305) Moore DF, O'Callaghan CA, & Berlyne G: Acute arsenic poisoning: absence of polyneuropathy after treatment with 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulphonate (DMPS). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994a; 57:1133-1135.
    306) Moore DF, O'Callaghan CA, Berlyne G, et al: Acute arsenic poisoning: absence of polyneuropathy after treatment with 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulphonate (DMPS). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57(9):1133-1135.
    307) Moore LE, Smith AH, & Hopenhayn-Rich: Micronuclei in exfoliated bladder cells among individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6:31-36.
    308) Moore LE, Warner ML, & Smith AH: Use of the fluorescent micronucleus assay to detect the genotoxic effects of radiation and arsenic exposure in exfoliated human epithelial cells. Environ Molec Mutagen 1996; 27:176-184.
    309) Morton WE & Caron GA: Encephalopathy: an uncommon manifestation of workplace arsenic poisoning?. Am J Ind Med 1989; 15:1-5.
    310) Mukherjee SC, Saha KC, Pati S, et al: Murshidabad--one of the nine groundwater arsenic-affected districts of West Bengal, India. Part II: dermatological, neurological, and obstetric findings. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):835-848.
    311) Mushak P & Crocetti AF: Response - accuracy, arsenic, and cancer. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104:1014-1018.
    312) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 12th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1997.
    313) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    314) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    315) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires Aug/31/2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    316) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    317) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    318) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    319) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    320) Nakamagoe K, Ishii K, Tamaoka A, et al: Upward gaze-evoked nystagmus with organoarsenic poisoning. Neurology 2006; 66(1):131-132.
    321) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    322) Narang APS: Arsenicosis in India. Clin Toxicol 1987a; 25:287-295.
    323) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    324) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    325) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    326) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    327) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    328) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    329) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    330) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    331) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    332) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    333) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    334) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    335) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    336) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    337) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    338) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    339) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    340) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    341) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    342) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    343) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    344) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    345) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    346) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    347) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    348) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    349) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    350) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    351) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    352) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    353) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    354) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    355) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    356) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    357) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    358) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    359) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    360) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    361) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    362) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    363) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    364) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    365) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    366) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    367) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    368) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    369) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    370) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    371) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    372) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    373) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    374) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    375) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    376) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    377) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    378) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    379) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    380) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    381) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    382) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    383) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    384) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    385) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    386) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    387) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    388) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    389) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    390) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    391) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    392) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    393) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    394) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    395) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    396) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    397) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    398) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    399) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    400) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    401) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    402) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    403) Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Pastor-Barriuso R, et al: Arsenic exposure and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in US adults. JAMA 2008; 300(7):814-822.
    404) Nazmul Ahasan HAM: Complications of chronic arsenic poisoning. Trop Doctor 2001; 31:28-29.
    405) Nelson LS: Copper. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1256-1265.
    406) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    407) Nevens F, Fevery J, & Van Steenbergen W: Arsenic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. A report of eight cases. J Hepatol 1990; 11:80-85.
    408) Ng JC, Johnson D, & Imray P: Speciation of arsenic metabolites in the urine of occupational workers and experimental rats using an optimised hydride cold-trapping method. Analyst 1998; 123:929-933.
    409) Nixon DE & Moyer TP: Arsenic analysis. 2. Rapid separation and quantification of inorganic arsenic plus metabolites and arsenobetaine from urine. Clin Chem 1992; 38:2479-2483.
    410) Nordenson I: Hereditas 1978; 88:47-50.
    411) Nordstrom S: Hereditas 1979; 90:297-302.
    412) Nygren O, Nilsson CA, & Lindahl R: Occupational exposure to chromium, copper and arsenic during work with impregnated wood in joinery shops. Ann Occup Hyg 1992; 36:509-517.
    413) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    414) OSHA: 29 CFR 1910.1018, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1988.
    415) OSHA: Personal Protective Equipment for General Industry. 59 FR 16334-16364, 59, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, 2000, pp 16334-16364.
    416) Oh SJ: Electrophysiological profile in arsenic neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1991; 54:1103-1105.
    417) Ori LV, Amacher MC, & Sedberry JE: Survey of the total arsenic content in soils in Louisiana. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 1993; 24:2321-2332.
    418) Ostrosky-Wegman P, Gonsebatt ME, & Montero R: Mutat Res 1991; 250:477-482.
    419) Oya-Ohta Y, Kaise T, & Ochi T: Induction of chromosomal aberrations in cultured human fibroblasts by inorganic and organic arsenic compounds and the different roles of glutathion in such induction. Mutat Res 1996; 357:123-129.
    420) Parish WR & Burnett JW: Arsenic exposure: the cutaneous manifestations. Cutis 1987; 40:401-402.
    421) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    422) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    423) Pepin J, Milord F, & Guern C: Trial of prednisolone for prevention of melarsoprol-induced encephalopathy in gambiense sleeping sickness. Lancet 1989; 1:1246-1250.
    424) Pepin J, Milord F, Meurice F, et al: High-dose nifurtimox for arseno-resistant Trypanosoma brucei gambiense sleeping sickness: an open trial in central Zaire. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1992; 86:254-256.
    425) Pershagen G, Bergman F, & Klominek J: Histological types of lung cancer among smelter workers exposed to arsenic. Br J Ind Med 1987; 44:454-458.
    426) Perticone F, Ceravolo R, & Cuccurullo O: Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in acquired long QT syndrome. Clin Drug Inverst 1997; 13:229-236.
    427) Peters HA, Croft WA, & Woolson EA: Seasonal arsenic exposure from burning chromium-copper-arsenate-treated wood. JAMA 1984; 251:2393-2396.
    428) Peterson & Rumack: D-penicillamine therapy of acute arsenic poisoning. J Ped 1977; 91:661.
    429) Pi J, Yamauchi H, Sun G, et al: Vascular dysfunction in patients with chronic arsenosis can be reversed by reduction of arsenic exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113(3):339-341.
    430) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1997.
    431) Product Information: BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, dimercaprol intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per manufacurer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    432) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Ovation Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Deerfield, IL, 2005.
    433) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Lundbeck Inc. (per Manufacturer), Deerfield, IL, 2011.
    434) Product Information: CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, penicillamine oral capsules. Merck & Co,Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2004.
    435) Product Information: Cordarone(R) oral tablets, amiodarone HCl oral tablets. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc (per FDA), Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
    436) Product Information: DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, penicillamine titratable oral tablets. Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Somerset, NJ, 2009.
    437) Product Information: DIMAVAL(R) IV, IM injection, (RS)-2,3-bis(sulphany)propane-1-sulphonic acid, sodium salt-Monohydrate IV IM injection. HEYL Chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH & Co., Berlin, Germany, 2004.
    438) Product Information: DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, (RS)-2,3-bis(sulphanyl)propane-1-sulphonic acid, sodium salt-monohydrate oral capsules. Heyl Chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH & Co., 2004.
    439) Product Information: Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)propane-1-sulfonic acid intravenous intramuscular injection solution. Heyl Chem.-pharm. Fabrik (per manufacturer), Berlin, Germany, 2013.
    440) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    441) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    442) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    443) Product Information: magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2009.
    444) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    445) Quansah R, Armah FA, Essumang DK, et al: Association of arsenic with adverse pregnancy outcomes/infant mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123(5):412-421.
    446) Quatrehomme G, Ricq O, & Lapalus P: Acute arsenic Intoxication: forensic and toxicologic aspects (an observation). J Forens Sci 1992; 37:1163-1171.
    447) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    448) Rahman A, Vahter M, Ekstrom EC, et al: Association of arsenic exposure during pregnancy with fetal loss and infant death: a cohort study in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165(12):1389-1396.
    449) Rahman M & Axelson O: Diabetes mellitus and arsenic exposure -- a second look at case-control data from a Swedish copper smelter. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52:773-774.
    450) Rahman M, Tondel M, & Ahmad SA: Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:198-203.
    451) Rahman M, Wingren G, & Axelson O: Diabetes mellitus among Swedish art glass workers -- an effect of arsenic exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996; 22:146-149.
    452) Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, & Mukherjee SC: Chronic arsenic toxicity in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India - A review and commentary. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:683-700.
    453) Rasco JF & Hood RD: Effects of maternal restraint stress and sodium arsenate in mice. Reprod Toxicol 1994; 8:49-54.
    454) Renwick JH, Harrington JM, & Waldron HA: Long-term effects of acute arsenical poisoning. J Soc Occup Med 1981; 31:144-147.
    455) Rezuke WN, Anderson C, & Pastuszak WT: Arsenic intoxication presenting as a myelodysplastic syndrome: a case report. Am J Hematol 1991; 36:291-293.
    456) Ridgway LP & Karnofsky DA: Ann Acad Sci 1952; 55:203-215.
    457) Ringenberg QS, Doll DC, & Patterson WP: Hematologic effects of heavy metal poisoning. South Med J 1988; 81:1132-1139.
    458) Rosa FW: Teratogen update: penicillamine. Teratology 1986; 33:127-131.
    459) Rosado JL, Ronquillo D, Kordas K, et al: Arsenic exposure and cognitive performance in Mexican schoolchildren. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115(9):1371-1375.
    460) Roth B, Schwarz E, Feng SY, et al: Good outcomes despite high urinary arsenic concentrations from overdose with crabgrass killer. J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(2):158-161.
    461) Ruokolainen M, Pantsar-Kallio M, & Haapa A: Leaching, runoff and speciation of arsenic in laboratory mesocosm. Sci Total Environ 2000; 258:339-347.
    462) Saady JJ, Blanke RV, & Poklis A: Estimation of the body burden of arsenic in a child fatally poisoned by arsenite weedkiller. J Anal Toxicol 1989; 13:310-312.
    463) Sass U, Grosshans E, & Simonart JM: Chronic Arsenicism: criminal poisoning or drug-intoxication?. Dermatology 1993; 186:303-305.
    464) Scalzo AJ, Thompson MW, & Peters DW: Asymptomatic presentation of pediatric arsenic ingestion from sodium arsenate ant killer (Abstract. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:340.
    465) Schaumloffel N & Gebel T: Heterogenicity of the DNA damage provoked by antimony and arsenic. Mutagenesis 1998; 13:281-286.
    466) Schoolmeester WL & White DR: Arsenic poisoning. South Med J 1980; 73:198-208.
    467) Selzer PM & Ancel MA: Chronic arsenic poisoning masquerading as pernicious anemia. West J Med 1983; 139:219-220.
    468) Shalat SL, Walker DB, & Finnell RH: Role of arsenic as a reproductive toxin with particular attention to neural tube defects. J Toxicol Environ Health 1996; 48:253-272.
    469) Shannon RL & Strayer DS: Arsenic-induced skin toxicity. Human Toxicol 1989; 8:99-104.
    470) Sheerin NS, Monk PN, & Aslam M: Simultaneous exposure to lead arsenic and mercury from indian ethnic remedies. Br J Clin Pract 1994; 48:332-333.
    471) Shum S, Whitehead J, & Vaughn L: Chelation of organoarsenate with dimercaptosuccinic acid. Vet Human Toxicol 1995; 37:239-242.
    472) Simonato L, Moulin JJ, & Javelaud B: A retrospective mortality study of workers exposed to arsenic in a gold mine and refinery in France. Am J Ind Med 1994; 25:625-633.
    473) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985, pp 86-90.
    474) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    475) Slayton TM, Beck BD, & Reynolds KA: Issues in arsenic cancer risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104:1012-1014.
    476) Smith AH, Goycolea M, & Hague R: Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147:660-669.
    477) Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y, et al: Increased mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis in young adults after exposure to arsenic in utero and in early childhood. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114(8):1293-1296.
    478) Smith MT, Warner ML, & Moore LE: Increased micronuclei in exfoliated bladder cells of individuals who chronically ingest arsenic-contaminated water in Nevada. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 1994; 3:583-590.
    479) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    480) Smith WM & Gallagher JJ: "Les torsades de pointes": an unusual ventricular arrhythmia. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:578-584.
    481) Snider TH, Wientjes MG, & Joiner RL: Arsenic distribution in rabbits after lewisite administration and treatment with British anti-lewisite (BAL). Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990; 14:262-272.
    482) Sobel W, Bond GG, & Baldwin CL: An update of respiratory cancer and occupational exposure to arsenicals. Am J Ind Med 1988; 13:263-270.
    483) Solomon L, Abrams G, & Dinner M: Neonatal abnormalities associated with d-penicillamine treatment during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:54.
    484) St Petery J, Gross C, & Victoria BE: Ventricular fibrillation caused by arsenic poisoning. Am J Dis Child 1970; 120:367-371.
    485) Steinmaus C, Bates MN, Yuan Y, et al: Arsenic methylation and bladder cancer risk in case-control studies in Argentina and the United States. J Occup Environ Med 2006; 48(5):478-488.
    486) Steinmaus C, Yuan Y, Bates MN, et al: Case-control study of bladder cancer and drinking water arsenic in the western United States. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:1193-1201.
    487) Stenehjem AE, Vahter M, Nermell B, et al: Slow recovery from severe inorganic arsenic poisoning despite treatment with DMSA (2.3-dimercaptosuccinic acid). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(4):424-428.
    488) Stohrer G: Arch Toxicol 1991; 65:525-531.
    489) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    490) Tabacova S, Baird DD, & Balabaeva L: Placental arsenic and cadmium in relation to lipid peroxides and glutathione levels in maternal-infant pairs from a copper smelter area. Placenta 1994; 15:873-881.
    491) Tamaki S & Frankenberger WT Jr: Environmental biochemistry of arsenic. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 1992; 124:79-110.
    492) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    493) Terasahde P, Pantsarkallio M, & Manninen PKG: Simultaneous determination of arsenic species by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 1996; 750:83-88.
    494) Tsai SY, Chou HY, The HW, et al: The effects of chronic arsenic exposure from drinking water on neurobehavioral development in adolescence. Neurotoxicology 2003; 24:747-753.
    495) Tseng HP, Wang YH, Wu MM, et al: Association between chronic exposure to arsenic and slow nerve conduction velocity among adolescents in Taiwan. J Health Popul.Nutr 2006; 24(2):182-189.
    496) Tsuda T, Babazono A, & Yamamoto E: Ingested arsenic and internal cancer: a historical cohort study followed for 33 years. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141:198-209.
    497) Tsuji JS, Benson R, & Schoof RA: Health effect levels for risk assessment of childhood exposure to arsenic. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004; 39:99-110.
    498) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    499) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    500) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    501) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    502) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    503) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    504) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    505) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    506) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    507) Uede K & Furukawa F: Skin manifestations in acute arsenic poisoning from the Wakayama curry-poisoning incident. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149:757-762.
    508) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    509) Vahter M: Environmental and occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic. ACTA Pharm Toxicol 1986; 59(Suppl 7):31-34.
    510) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    511) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    512) Valentine JL, Shan-Yuan He, & Reisbord LS: Health response by questionnaire in arsenic-exposed populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:487-494.
    513) Van Voorhis WC: Therapy and prophylaxis of systemic protozoan infections. Drugs 1990; 40:176-202.
    514) Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, et al: Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    515) Vaziri ND, Upham T, & Barton CH: Hemodialysis clearance of arsenic. Clin Toxicol 1980; 17:451-456.
    516) Wagner SL & Weswig P: Arsenic in blood and urine of forest workers as indices of exposure to cacodylic acid. Arch Environ Health 1974; 28:77-79.
    517) Wagner SL, Maliner JS, & Morton WE: Skin cancer and arsenical intoxication from well water. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115:1205-1207.
    518) Wasserman GA, Liu X, Parvez F, et al: Water arsenic exposure and intellectual function in 6-year-old children in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115(2):285-289.
    519) Watson WA, Veltri JC, & Metcalf TJ: Acute arsenic exposure treated with oral D-penicillamine. Vet Human Toxicol 1981; 23:164-166.
    520) Wax PM & Thornton CA: Recovery from severe arsenic-induced peripheral neuropathy with 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulphonic acid. Clin Toxicol 2000a; 38:777-780.
    521) Wax PM & Thornton CA: Recovery from severe arsenic-induced peripheral neuropathy with 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulphonic acid. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38(7):777-780.
    522) Weiai W: Occupational cancer epidemiology in the people's republic of China. J Occup Med 1988; 30:968-974.
    523) Wellde BT, Chumo DA, Reardon MJ, et al: Treatment of Rhodesian sleeping sickness in Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1989; 83(suppl):99-109.
    524) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    525) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    526) Wlodarczyk BJ, Bennett GD, & Calvin JA: Arsenic-induced neural tube defects in mice -- alterations in cell cycle gene expression. Reprod Toxicol 1996; 10:447-454.
    527) Wolf L, St Clair D, & Cullen N: A case report of pediatric arsenic. Vet Human Toxicol 1993; 35:356.
    528) Wong SS, Tan KC, & Goh CL: Cutaneous manifestations of chronic arsenicism: Review of seventeen cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38:179-185.
    529) Woody NC & Kometani JT: BAL in the treatment of arsenic ingestion of children. Pediatr 1948; 1:372-378.
    530) Woollons A & Russell-Jones R: Chronic endemic hydroarsenicism. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139:1092-1096.
    531) Yager JW & Wiencke JK: Enhancement of Chromosomal Damage by Arsenic -- Implications for Mechanism. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101(Suppl3):79-82.
    532) Yanez L, Garcia-Nieto E, Rojas E, et al: DNA damage in blood cells from children exposed to arsenic and lead in a mining area. Environ Res 2003; 93:231-240.
    533) Yang C, Chiu H, Wu T, et al: Reduction in kidney cancer mortality following installation of a tap water supply system in an arsenic-endemic area of Taiwan. Arch Environ Health 2004; 59(9):484-488.
    534) Yang CY , Chang CC , & Chiu HF : Does arsenic exposure increase the risk for prostate cancer?. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2008; 71(23):1559-1563.
    535) Yuan Y, Marshall G, Ferreccio C, et al: Acute myocardial infarction mortality in comparison with lung and bladder cancer mortality in arsenic-exposed region II of Chile from 1950 to 2000. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 166(12):1381-1391.
    536) Zaloga GP, Deal J, & Spurling T: Case report: unusual manifestations of arsenic intoxication. Am J Med Sci 1970; 289:210-214.
    537) Zenz C: Occupational Medicine, 3rd ed, Mosby-Year Books, St. Louis, MO, 1994.
    538) Zilker T, Felgenhauer N, & Pfab R: Little effect of haemodialysis and cavhdf on the elimination of arsenic compared to dmps treatment (abstract). J Tox - Clin Tox 1999; 37:400-401.
    539) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    540) vonEhrenstein OS, Poddar S, Yuan Y, et al: Children's intellectual function in relation to arsenic exposure. Epidemiology 2007; 18(1):44-51.