MOBILE VIEW  | 

THEOPHYLLINE-EPHEDRINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Theophylline-ephedrine combinations are bronchodilators for the management of asthma.

Specific Substances

    A) THEOPHYLLINE
    1) 1,3-Dimethylxanthine
    2) 3,7-Dihydro-1,3-Dimethylpurine 2,6(IH)-dione
    3) Anhydrous theophylline
    4) Teofilina
    5) Theocin
    EPHEDRINE
    1) (IR,25)-2-Methylamino-1-phenylpropan-1-ol
    2) hemihydrate
    3) Efedrina
    4) Ephedrina
    5) Ephedrinum
    6) Ephedrinum hydratum
    7) Hydrated ephedrine
    8) CAS 50906-05-3
    EPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
    1) Ephedrinae hydrochloridum
    2) Ephedrini hydrochloridum
    3) Ephedrinium chloratum
    4) CAS 50-98-6
    EPHEDRINE SULFATE
    1) Ephedrine sulphate
    2) CAS 134-72-5
    GENERAL TERMS
    1) Theophylline-Ephedrine Combinations

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Many brand names which often include other ingredients such as sedatives, glycerol guaiacolate, iodides, antihistamines, and others.
    2) Immediate release tablets and capsules contain 65 to 130 mg of theophylline and 16 to 25 mg of ephedrine.
    3) A sustained-release tablet is available, which contains theophylline 180 mg and ephedrine hydrochloride 48 mg.
    4) Do-Do tablets are an over-the-counter cough and cold remedy containing 222 mg ephedrine hydrochloride, 30 mg caffeine, and 50 mg theophylline sodium glycinate (51% anhydrous theophylline) (Loosmore & Armstrong, 1990). These tablets are not available in the United States.
    5) EPHEDRINE - is categorized as a Schedule V controlled substance in several states to help prevent abuse. In addition, to being abused as a stimulant, ephedrine can also be chemically manipulated to produce illicit designer drugs, such as methcathinone ("cat") and methamphetamine ("crank")(USPDI , 2001).
    a) Although ephedrine has been used as a bronchodilator, a nasal decongestant, and in the treatment of urinary incontinence, it has been generally replaced by safer and more effective medications (USPDI , 2001).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) Theophylline-ephedrine combinations may produce clinical effects similar to those seen with theophylline alone but at lower theophylline concentrations.
    B) ACUTE OVERDOSE - characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, mild metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia, leukocytosis, tachycardia. Severe effects (seizures, hypotension, significant dysrhythmias) generally do not develop unless serum concentrations are 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter or greater.
    C) CHRONIC OVERDOSE - Gastrointestinal symptoms may be mild or absent and metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia generally do not develop. Severe effects (seizures, significant dysrhythmias) are more common than with acute overdose, and may develop abruptly at serum concentrations of 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter or less.
    D) RISK FACTORS - Patients 60 years of age or older and those aged 3 years and younger are at increased risk for developing life threatening toxicity, as are patients with significant underlying medical conditions.
    E) SUSTAINED RELEASE PREPARATIONS - Overdose can result in delayed and prolonged (50 to 60 hours) CNS and cardiovascular toxicity and sustained toxic serum levels.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Sinus tachycardia is common. Other dysrhythmias including atrial fibrillation or flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, multifocal atrial tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, and cardiac arrest may occur, most often with chronic intoxication.
    B) Mild transient hypertension may develop. Hypotension may develop with severe overdose.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Tremors are common. Restlessness, agitation, hallucinations, and headache may occur. Seizures may develop abruptly, more commonly after chronic overdose, and may progress to status epilepticus.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea are common, particularly with acute intoxication. Sustained release formulations may form bezoars.
    0.2.11) ACID-BASE
    A) Mild metabolic acidosis is common with acute overdose. Acute theophylline overdose may also cause respiratory alkalosis. Severe metabolic acidosis may develop in patients with seizures or hypotension.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) Hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and acidosis may occur, especially after acute and acute-on-therapeutic overdoses.
    0.2.15) MUSCULOSKELETAL
    A) Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome are rare complications seen in patients with prolonged seizures.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Theophylline does cross the placenta, and adverse effects may be present in the newborn with peripheral blood levels considered to be therapeutic and nontoxic for adults.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Determine serial (every 1 to 2 hours) serum theophylline levels; peak level may not occur for many hours after overdose of a sustained release preparation.
    B) Monitor serum glucose and electrolytes.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) Induction of emesis is not recommended.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    1) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) Consider gastric lavage after ingestion of sustained release formulations even if delayed.
    E) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Repeated oral charcoal dosing may enhance total body clearance and elimination. Recommended in patients with moderate to severe poisoning or rising levels. Do not repeat charcoal if an ileus is present.
    F) Persistent vomiting may interfere with activated charcoal administration. Treat with ranitidine (50 mg iv), ondansetron (Adults: 8 mg iv), or metoclopramide (0.4 to 1 mg/kg iv).
    G) Whole bowel irrigation may be useful in patients who have ingested large quantities of sustained release preparations. Administer a polyethylene glycol balanced solution as a bowel prep at the following rate: ADULT 2 L initially followed by 1.5 to 2 L per hour; CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour; CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour orally or by nasogastric tube until rectal effluent is clear and theophylline levels decline. Protect airway as clinically indicated.
    H) SEIZURES - Administer diazepam IV bolus (DOSE: ADULT: 5 to 10 mg initially which may be repeated every 5 to 15 minutes as needed. CHILD: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg initially repeat every 5 minutes as needed) or lorazepam IV bolus (DOSE: ADULT: 4 to 8 mg; CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg). Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression and the need for endotracheal intubation.
    1) Administer intravenous phenobarbital (DOSE: ADULT: 10 to 20 mg/kg given at 25 to 60 mg/min. CHILD: 15 to 20 mg/kg given at 25 to 50 mg/min).
    I) HYPOTENSION - Administer 0.9% saline 10 to 20 ml/kg and place in Trendelenburg position. If pressors are required agents with predominantly alpha effects, such as phenylephrine or levarterenol, are preferred as patients with theophylline overdose have excessive beta adrenergic stimulation.
    J) If severe tachycardia results in hemodynamic compromise or ischemia, beta blocking agents may be used as a temporary measure until hemodialysis or hemoperfusion can be performed. A short acting cardioselective agent such as esmolol is preferred. Use with caution in patients with asthma or COPD.
    K) Begin intravenous hydration and replace electrolytes as indicated. Obtain serial theophylline levels every 1 to 2 hours initially, follow serum electrolytes, obtain an ECG and institute cardiac monitoring.
    L) Consider hemoperfusion or hemodialysis in patients with severe toxicity (significant dysrhythmias, hypotension, seizures), patients with serum levels greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter after acute overdose, and patients with levels greater than 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter after chronic overdose and age greater than 60 or less than 3 years.
    1) Newer dialysis membranes achieve theophylline clearance rates similar to those reported with hemoperfusion and should be considered an acceptable alternative to hemoperfusion.
    2) Exchange transfusion has been used in infants and young children when dialysis was not available.
    M) EPHEDRINE: Following overdose, treatment primarily includes protecting the patient's airway and supporting ventilation and perfusion. Hypertension or hypotension, tachydysrhythmias, and seizures may occur following acute exposure.
    1) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate hypertension without evidence of end organ damage, pharmacologic intervention is generally not necessary. Sedative agents such as benzodiazepines may be helpful in treating hypertension and tachycardia in agitated patients, especially if a sympathomimetic agent is involved in the poisoning.
    2) For hypertensive emergencies (severe hypertension with evidence of end organ injury (CNS, cardiac, renal), or emergent need to lower mean arterial pressure 20% to 25% within one hour), sodium nitroprusside is preferred. Nitroglycerin and phentolamine are possible alternatives.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) POTENTIALLY TOXIC DOSE - Ingestions of more than 10 mg/kg of theophylline, particularly in combination with ephedrine, should be considered potentially toxic.
    B) MONITORING - Patients with levels above 30 mcg/mL (166 mcmol/L) should be observed and monitored until the levels are therapeutic.
    C) ESTIMATED SERUM LEVEL - Approximate serum level of non-sustained release products by doubling the theophylline dose in mg/kg. The serum concentration is in mcg/mL (mcg/mL x 5.55 = mcmol/L).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) Theophylline-ephedrine combinations may produce clinical effects similar to those seen with theophylline alone but at lower theophylline concentrations.
    B) ACUTE OVERDOSE - characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, mild metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia, leukocytosis, tachycardia. Severe effects (seizures, hypotension, significant dysrhythmias) generally do not develop unless serum concentrations are 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter or greater.
    C) CHRONIC OVERDOSE - Gastrointestinal symptoms may be mild or absent and metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia generally do not develop. Severe effects (seizures, significant dysrhythmias) are more common than with acute overdose, and may develop abruptly at serum concentrations of 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter or less.
    D) RISK FACTORS - Patients 60 years of age or older and those aged 3 years and younger are at increased risk for developing life threatening toxicity, as are patients with significant underlying medical conditions.
    E) SUSTAINED RELEASE PREPARATIONS - Overdose can result in delayed and prolonged (50 to 60 hours) CNS and cardiovascular toxicity and sustained toxic serum levels.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) HYPERTHERMIA - Evidence of ongoing hypermetabolism and hyperthermia developed in a 22-year-old male following an ingestion of 17.5 grams of slow-release theophylline (Parr & Willatts, 1991).
    1) ADMINISTRATION OF DANTROLENE 1 mg/kg over 20 minutes followed by 2 mg/kg/hour for 4 hours was associated with reductions in temperature and minute volume (Parr & Willatts, 1991).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Sinus tachycardia is common. Other dysrhythmias including atrial fibrillation or flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, multifocal atrial tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, and cardiac arrest may occur, most often with chronic intoxication.
    B) Mild transient hypertension may develop. Hypotension may develop with severe overdose.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) Cardiac dysrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, sinus and supraventricular tachycardia (Olson et al, 1985; Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992), and ventricular tachycardia, as well as cardiac arrest (Russo, 1979), can be precipitated by theophylline overdose or by rapid IV administration.
    2) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS - Supraventricular ectopic beats and/or ventricular premature beats were observed in 7 of 16 patients who had a variety of medical problems and serum theophylline concentrations of 31 to 72 mg/L (Sessler & Cohen, 1990).
    B) DRUG INTERACTION
    1) THEOPHYLLINE-EPHEDRINE COMBINATION - Concomitant administration of ephedrine increases the risk of cardiotoxicity because of its synergistic effects (Nicklae & Balazs, 1986).
    C) CARDIOMYOPATHY
    1) CASE REPORT - Cardiomyopathy has been described after chronic excessive abuse of ephedrine, more than 400 mg/day for more than 14 years, in a 35-year-old man (Van Mieghem et al, 1978).
    D) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) CASE REPORT - Primary T-wave inversion was reported in a 33-year-old woman with an acute-on-chronic overdose of theophylline, and a plasma level of 50.4 mcg/mL (Kolander et al, 1989).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Tremors are common. Restlessness, agitation, hallucinations, and headache may occur. Seizures may develop abruptly, more commonly after chronic overdose, and may progress to status epilepticus.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FEELING NERVOUS
    1) Symptoms include insomnia, nervousness, irritability and severe headaches in some patients.
    B) HEADACHE
    1) Severe headaches also can occur at serum concentrations of theophylline above the therapeutic range (10 to 20 mcg/mL) (55 to 111 mcmol/L).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) More extreme CNS signs of toxicity include severe restlessness, agitation, and generalized seizures. Seizures may be refractory to standard anticonvulsant therapy.
    2) CASE SERIES - Among 5 pediatric patients who had seizures following theophylline overdose, the average age was 5.7 years and the mean peak theophylline level was 71 mcg/mL (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992). This group was significantly younger than those who were clinically stable (n=125). The incidence of seizures or dysrhythmias was 100% and patients with acute intoxications had these events at higher theophylline levels than those with chronic or acute-on-chronic poisonings.
    D) HALLUCINATIONS
    1) Hallucinations have been reported in children with a serum theophylline concentration greater than 30 mcg/mL (Baker, 1986).
    E) TREMOR
    1) Tremor is frequently associated with theophylline toxicity (Paloucek & Rodvold, 1988).
    F) SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE
    1) Subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral angitis has been reported in a 20-year-old male following the ingestion of ephedrine (Wooten et al, 1983).
    G) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) CASE REPORT - A 3.5-month-old and 12-month-old developed brain damage associated with an overdosage of theophylline (Noetzel, 1985; Bigler, 1991). A cause and effect relationship could not be established in either case due to multiple confounding factors.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea are common, particularly with acute intoxication. Sustained release formulations may form bezoars.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VOMITING
    1) Nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea can occur as the serum concentration of theophylline increases. Bloody emesis can also result from severe theophylline-ephedrine intoxication (Gardner et al, 1950).
    B) GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) Gastrointestinal hemorrhage may be associated with theophylline toxicity (Paloucek & Rodvold, 1988).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) CASE REPORT - Rhabdomyolysis producing acute renal failure has been described following overdose of theophylline in a 19-year-old woman (MacDonald et al, 1985), in a 22-year-old woman (Rumpf et al, 1985), in a 16-year-old girl (Wight et al, 1987), and in a 22-year-old male (Parr & Willatts, 1991).
    B) BLOOD IN URINE
    1) CASE REPORT - Prolonged microscopic hematuria in the absence of myoglobinuria or oliguria was seen in one patient (Anderson et al, 1991).
    C) SERUM CREATININE RAISED
    1) CASE REPORT - A 19-year-old asthmatic male developed elevation of serum creatinine (0.24 mmol/L) during the first 24 hours following an overdose of 6 grams of slow-release theophylline (Anderson et al, 1991).

Acid-Base

    3.11.1) SUMMARY
    A) Mild metabolic acidosis is common with acute overdose. Acute theophylline overdose may also cause respiratory alkalosis. Severe metabolic acidosis may develop in patients with seizures or hypotension.
    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) Mild metabolic acidosis is common with acute intoxication or acute intoxication on top of chronic therapeutic use (Shannon, 1993) Hagley et al, 1994). Severe metabolic acidosis has resulted from acute overdoses (Bernard, 1991) Ker & Newman, 1993).
    2) INCIDENCE - In a retrospective series of 19 patients with acute theophylline overdose who did not develop seizures, 15 (79%) developed mild metabolic acidosis (Olsen et al, 1985). In comparison, of 8 patients with chronic intoxication who did not develop seizures, 0 had a metabolic acidosis.
    3) CASE REPORT - A pure metabolic acidosis with elevated serum lactate levels was reported in an 18-year-old man who ingested 9 grams of sustained release theophylline (Leventhal et al, 1989).
    4) CASE REPORT - Bernard (1991) reported two cases in which the presentation of theophylline overdose included severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.67 and 6.63) due to lactic acidosis (24.5 mmol/L and 21 mmol/L).
    a) Administration of modest amounts of sodium bicarbonate was associated with resolution of the acidosis prior to institution of charcoal hemoperfusion.
    B) RESPIRATORY ALKALOSIS
    1) Respiratory alkalosis as well as metabolic acidosis may occur in acute overdose (Hall et al, 1984).
    C) KETOSIS
    1) NON-DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS - Ketones were detected in urine and in the patient's breath. Resolution of ketoacidosis coincided with resolution of theophylline intoxication (Ryan et al, 1989).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) CASE SERIES - An 86% incidence of neutrophil leukocytosis was noted in one series of 64 cases of theophylline poisoning (Parr et al, 1990).
    a) Acute, chronic, or acute-on-chronic poisoning was not addressed.
    b) The maximum leukocyte count ranged from 7.3 to 29 x 10(9)/L with a mean of 17.7 X 10(9)/L.
    2) CASE REPORT - Anderson et al (1991) reported a 19-year-old asthmatic male with marked leukocytosis of 47.8 x 10(-9)/L following an overdose of 6 grams slow-release theophylline. This patient had no signs of inflammation and fever was absent. The leukocytosis lasted 4 days.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.1) SUMMARY
    A) Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome are rare complications seen in patients with prolonged seizures.
    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMPARTMENT SYNDROME
    1) CASE REPORT - Compartmental hypertension of calves, measured by slit catheter technique, developed in a 41-year-old woman following an ingestion of an unknown amount of slow-release aminophylline (225 mg tablets) (Lloyd et al, 1990).
    2) CASE REPORT - Bilateral calf compartment syndrome requiring surgical decompression developed in a 22-year-old male following an ingestion of 17.5 grams of slow-release theophylline (Parr & Willatts, 1991).
    3) CASE REPORT - A 24-year-old male developed profound hypokalemia and seizures which led to rhabdomyolysis and acute lower and upper limb compartment syndrome (Titley & Williams, 1992). He had ingested 20 slow-release 400 mg theophylline tablets and did not survive despite hemoperfusion and bilateral decompression.

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) Hyperglycemia is a consistent finding in acute theophylline overdose (Biberstein et al, 1984; Tsiu et al, 1990; Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992).
    2) CASE SERIES - 72% incidence of hyperglycemia was noted in a series of 57 cases of theophylline poisoning (Parr et al, 1990).
    a) Acute, chronic, or acute-on-chronic poisoning was not addressed.
    b) Serum glucose concentrations ranged from 104 to 353 mg/dL (5.8 to 19.6 mmol/L) with a mean of 202 mg/dL (11.2 mmol/L).
    3) CASE SERIES - Hyperglycemia occurred in 89% of 125 pediatric patients (mean age 12 years, range 3 days to 20 years) with theophylline overdoses (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992). The mean glucose levels were 196 mg/dL in acute cases, 127 mg/dL in chronic cases, and 218 mg/dL in acute-on-chronic poisonings.

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Theophylline does cross the placenta, and adverse effects may be present in the newborn with peripheral blood levels considered to be therapeutic and nontoxic for adults.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Theophylline does cross the placenta, and adverse effects may be present in the newborn with peripheral blood levels considered to be therapeutic and nontoxic for adults.
    a) Toxic manifestations include vomiting, feeding difficulties, tachycardia, jitteriness, cardiac dysrhythmias, and transient hypoglycemia.
    b) Asthmatic mothers who were receiving theophylline preparations throughout their pregnancies and at time of delivery delivered infants with:
    1) Mean cord theophylline levels of 10.21 micrograms/mL (56.7 mcmol/L),
    2) Mean healstick theophylline levels of 9.84 micrograms/mL (54.6 mcmol/L).
    3) Three babies with levels of theophylline greater than 10 micrograms/mL (55.5 mcmol/L) were tachycardic and jittery (Labovitz & Spector, 1982).
    c) CASE REPORT - In one case report, a neonate with a serum theophylline concentration of 14 micrograms/mL at delivery did not demonstrate signs of theophylline toxicity (Arwood et al, 1979).
    B) OTHER NON-SPECIFIC
    1) Theophylline pharmacokinetics were recently studied in 5 women during and after pregnancy.
    a) PROTEIN BINDING was reduced to 11.1 +/- 4.7% and 13 +/- 5.9% during second and third trimester, respectively.
    b) DISTRIBUTION VOLUME AND ELIMINATION t1/2 were increased in the third trimester.
    c) Intrinsic nonrenal clearance was reduced while intrinsic renal clearance increased (Frederiksen et al, 1986).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Determine serial (every 1 to 2 hours) serum theophylline levels; peak level may not occur for many hours after overdose of a sustained release preparation.
    B) Monitor serum glucose and electrolytes.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Determine serial (every 1 to 2 hours) theophylline concentrations until there is a documented serial decline towards the therapeutic range. Levels should be followed serially even if the initial level is low, especially with the slow release preparations.
    2) MONITOR SERUM ELECTROLYTES especially potassium. Hypokalemia may occur and is common after overdoses.
    3) SUSTAINED-RELEASE - In overdose involving sustained release products, a single theophylline measurement is inadequate since levels can increase significantly over the subsequent hours and may not peak for 12 to 24 hours (Buckley et al, 1983).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINE
    1) Ephedrine may be qualitatively detected in urine by thin layer chromatography. This may be useful information as coingestion of ephedrine may lower the toxic dose of theophylline.

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) An EMIT(R) homogeneous enzyme immunoassay is available for measurement of theophylline in serum or plasma. The assay's range of quantitation is 2.5 to 40 mcg/mL for theophylline. Clinical studies show excellent correlation between this method and HPLC.
    B) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Several HPLC procedures for the determination of theophylline have been described. This method allows rapid measurement of theophylline in very small samples (ie, 0.5 mL of serum) (Anon, 1985).
    2) Ephedrine may be identified on urine screen by thin-layer chromatography in a qualitative manner.
    C) OTHER
    1) CITRIC ACID-induced saliva theophylline concentrations were found to correlate well with paired plasma theophylline concentrations.
    2) A citric acid crystal (5 mg) was placed on the tongue to stimulate saliva production for theophylline concentration measurements. This technique was painless and well tolerated in infants and children with asthma.
    3) Therapeutic range limits of this technique has not been established (Aviram et al, 1987).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Admit all patients with chronic intoxication, patients with acute ingestion of sustained release products and those with acute ingestions in whom serum theophylline levels are not falling. Patients with symptoms beyond mild tachycardia, nausea, vomiting and tremor and those whose symptoms do not resolve should be admitted. Patients with persistent symptoms or toxic serum theophylline levels should be admitted to the hospital.
    6.3.1.4) PATIENT TRANSFER/ORAL
    A) Patients who are at risk for developing life threatening toxicity (chronic overdose with serum theophylline levels greater than 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter and age greater than 60 or less than 3 years, acute overdose and serum level greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter) should be transferred to a facility where hemodialysis or hemoperfusion are available.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with acute ingestion of immediate release preparations who have only mild clinical effects (mild tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, tremor) can be observed in the ED with activated charcoal therapy, cardiac monitoring and serial theophylline levels.
    B) Patients may be discharged when they are asymptomatic and their serum theophylline levels fall below 20 micrograms/milliliter.
    C) Patients with persistent or worsening signs and symptoms or serum theophylline levels not declining towards the therapeutic range should be admitted to a monitored setting.

Monitoring

    A) Determine serial (every 1 to 2 hours) serum theophylline levels; peak level may not occur for many hours after overdose of a sustained release preparation.
    B) Monitor serum glucose and electrolytes.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Induction of emesis is not recommended.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Activated charcoal has been shown to effectively adsorb theophylline in vitro and to decrease theophylline absorption in human volunteer studies (Cooney, 1995; Minton et al, 1995; Minton et al, 1995).
    2) EPHEDRINE: Activated charcoal may decrease absorption from the gastrointestinal tract (USPDI , 2001).
    3) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    4) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Gastric lavage should be considered in substantial recent ingestions. It may be indicated after ingestion of sustained release formulations even if delayed, as these products may form bezoars.
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Multiple-dose activated charcoal should be considered after potentially severe or life threatening overdoses. It has been shown effective in enhancing the elimination of theophylline in the following settings:
    a) Therapeutic intravenous theophylline doses in healthy volunteers (Berlinger et al, 1983; Park et al, 1983; Park et al, 1984; Mahutte et al, 1983; Radomski et al, 1984; Chyka et al, 1995) and in patients with cirrhosis (Radomski et al, 1984).
    b) Therapeutic oral SR theophylline tablets in healthy children ages 8 to 18 (Lim et al, 1986).
    c) Intravenous overdoses in experimental animals (Brashear et al, 1985; Arimori & Nakano, 1985; Kulig et al, 1987; Huang, 1987).
    d) In case reports of patients with either a deliberate (Radomski et al, 1984; Hendeles & Weinberger, 1980; Sessler et al, 1987; Gal et al, 1984; Corser et al, 1985) or iatrogenic (Radomski et al, 1984; Hendeles & Weinberger, 1980; Sessler et al, 1987; True et al, 1984) overdose; treatment with multiple dose activated charcoal was associated with reduced theophylline half life.
    e) MDC therapy has been used successfully in a pregnant patient (Davis et al, 1985), a premature newborn (Strauss et al, 1985), in infants (Bronstein et al, 1984; Ginoza et al, 1987; Shannon et al, 1987), and in children (Lim et al, 1986).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Longdon & Henderson (1992) reported two cases (one fatal) of intestinal pseudo-obstruction following the use of enteral charcoal, sorbitol and mechanical ventilation with papaveretum sedation and neuromuscular blockade. Sympathomimetic stimulation by theophylline and reduced intestinal peristalsis from opioids probably contributed to this effect.
    b) A 45-year-old man with acute theophylline overdose developed intestinal pseudo-obstruction after treatment including 1000 grams of charcoal without cathartic, haloperidol, and mechanical ventilation (Brubacher et al, 1995).
    c) A 64-year-old woman developed small bowel obstruction after treatment with multiple dose activated charcoal for theophylline overdose (Goulbourne & Cisek, 1994). The presence of adhesions probably contributed.
    3) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    a) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dose not established. After an initial dose of 50 to 100 grams of activated charcoal, subsequent doses may be administered every 1, 2 or 4 hours at a dose equivalent to 12.5 grams/hour (Vale et al, 1999), do not exceed: 0.5 g/kg charcoal every 2 hours (Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013; Mauro et al, 1994). There is some evidence that smaller more frequent doses are more effective at enhancing drug elimination than larger less frequent doses (Park et al, 1983; Ilkhanipour et al, 1992). PEDIATRIC DOSE: Optimal dose not established. After an initial dose of 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) (Chyka & Seger, 1997), subsequent doses may be administered every 1, 2 or 4 hours (Vale et al, 1999) in a dose equivalent to 6.25 grams/hour in children 1 to 12 years old.
    b) Activated charcoal should be continued until the patient's clinical and laboratory parameters, including drug concentrations if available, are improving (Vale et al, 1999). The patient should be frequently assessed for the ability to protect the airway and evidence of decreased peristalsis or intestinal obstruction.
    c) Use of cathartics has not been shown to increase drug elimination and may increase the likelihood of vomiting. Routine coadministration of a cathartic is NOT recommended (Vale et al, 1999).
    d) AGENTS AMENABLE TO MDAC THERAPY: The following properties of a drug that are likely to allow MDAC therapy to be effective include: small volume of distribution, low protein binding, prolonged half-life, low intrinsic clearance, and a nonionized state at physiologic pH (Chyka, 1995; Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013).
    e) Vomiting is a common adverse effect; antiemetics may be necessary.
    f) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Absolute contraindications include an unprotected airway, intestinal obstruction, a gastrointestinal tract that is not intact and agents that may increase the risk of aspiration (eg, hydrocarbons). Relative contraindications include decreased peristalsis (eg, decreased bowel sounds, abdominal distention, ileus, severe constipation) (Vale et al, 1999; Mauro et al, 1994).
    g) COMPLICATIONS: Include constipation, intestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, appendicitis, charcoal bezoars, and aspiration which may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome or bronchiolitis obliterans (Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013; Ray et al, 1988; Atkinson et al, 1992; Gomez et al, 1994; Mizutani et al, 1991; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Mina et al, 2002; Harsch, 1986; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002).
    D) VOMITING
    1) Persistent vomiting may interfere with attempts to administer activated charcoal. In one series of 33 patients, 22% of activated charcoal doses were vomited; acutely toxic patients vomited all doses (Sessler et al, 1987).
    2) Ranitidine may be useful in controlling excess gastric secretions that may lead to the persistent vomiting (Amitai et al, 1986). Cimetidine may interfere with theophylline clearance.
    3) Several case reports suggest that ondansetron may be effective in intractable nausea and vomiting associated with theophylline toxicity (Sage et al, 1993; Brown & Prentice, 1992; Daly & Taylor, 1993; Roberts et al, 1993). Usual adult dose is 8 milligrams intravenously.
    4) Another effective antiemetic can include metoclopramide (0.4 to 1 milligram/kilogram). Phenothiazines should be avoided.
    E) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) INDICATIONS - Based on limited clinical data, whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte balanced solution (e.g., Golytely(R)) may be considered in cases of extremely large amounts of a SR theophylline preparation with rising serum levels (Tenenbein, 1987).
    2) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL INTERACTION - Hoffman et al (1989) and (1991) reported that polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution is able to displace aminophylline (theophylline) from activated charcoal in-vitro.
    3) Burkhart et al (1991) reported no additional benefit of whole bowel irrigation over activated charcoal alone in the treatment of sustained-release theophylline poisoning.
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SEIZURE
    1) SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS
    a) SUMMARY: Several studies have demonstrated that prophylaxis with phenobarbital prior to the onset of seizures in theophylline-toxic animals delays or prevents seizures and improves survival.
    b) Prospective clinical studies are not available. Consider phenobarbital prophylaxis in patients at high risk for developing seizures, where the potential benefits exceed the risks of therapy. Patients at high risk include:
    1) Those with serum theophylline level of 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter and age greater than 60 or less than 3 years following chronic overdose (Olson et al, 1985; Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992; Shannon, 1993).
    2) Those with serum level greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter following acute overdose (Olson et al, 1983; Gaudreault et al, 1983; Goldberg et al, 1986).
    c) Monitor carefully for respiratory depression and hypotension; be prepared to intubate and provide mechanical ventilation (Shaner et al, 1988). Use of a propylene glycol-free preparation may lessen the risk of hypotension (i.e., sodium phenobarbital, Lilly).
    2) TREATMENT
    a) SUMMARY: Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (diazepam or lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur administer phenobarbital. Based on animal and limited human data, phenytoin does not appear to be effective in theophylline-induced seizures.
    1) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and the need for endotracheal intubation.
    2) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or treat with intravenous dextrose ADULT: 100 milligrams IV, CHILD: 2 milliliters/kilogram 25% dextrose).
    b) EPHEDRINE - Seizures may occur following overdose; treat with diazepam, or phenobarbital (USPDI , 2001).
    c) DIAZEPAM
    1) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    3) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    d) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    1) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    e) LORAZEPAM
    1) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    2) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    f) PHENOBARBITAL
    1) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    5) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    6) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    g) OTHER AGENTS
    1) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    a) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    c) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    h) RECURRING SEIZURES
    1) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents:
    a) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    b) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
    2) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised.
    3) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003).
    3) STUDIES
    a) HUMAN
    1) In a retrospective review of 100 cases of theophylline-induced seizures, phenytoin was ineffective in 21 of 22 cases. In the patient who responded, diazepam was also given (Jacobs & Senior, 1974).
    b) ANIMAL
    1) RABBITS - Treatment with intravenous phenobarbital 20 milligrams/kilogram immediately following administration of 115 milligrams/kilogram of theophylline resulted in 50 percent mortality, compared to 80 percent in controls and 77 percent treated with phenytoin (Goldberg et al, 1986a).
    2) MICE - Czuczwar et al (1987) demonstrated that phenobarbital antagonized tonic-clonic seizures induced by theophylline, while phenytoin was totally ineffective against clonic seizures and did not prevent lethality.
    3) MICE - Pretreatment with phenobarbital (producing a mean serum level of 24.4 micrograms/milliliter) protected against seizures and delayed onset of seizures from 23.5 minutes to 44 minutes.
    a) A higher dose (mean serum level 44 micrograms/milliliter) further delayed onset to 64 minutes. Survival was improved in both phenobarbital dosage groups.
    b) In contrast, pretreatment with phenytoin actually shortened the time to onset of seizures (5.7 minutes with a mean serum level of 9 micrograms/milliliter) (Blake et al, 1988).
    4) Phenytoin was demonstrated to worsen the outcome compared to controls in some studies (Stone & Javid, 1980; Blake et al, 1988).
    B) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Patients with severe theophylline overdose generally have excessive beta adrenergic stimulation. In theory, agents with predominantly alpha agonist effects may be more effective for hypotension unresponsive to fluids. If hypotension is secondary to severe tachycardia, a short acting cardioselective beta antagonist such as esmolol may be indicated.
    2) EPHEDRINE - Marked hypotension may occur following overdose, use of intravenous fluids and inotropic vasopressors is indicated (USPDI , 2001).
    3) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    4) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    5) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    6) PHENYLEPHRINE
    a) Add 10 milligrams phenylephrine to 500 milliliters of normal saline and infuse at a rate of 100 to 180 micrograms/minute initially, then lower infusion to 40 to 60 micrograms/minute as tolerated (Prod Info Neo-Synephrine(R), phenylephrine, 1996).
    C) PROPRANOLOL
    1) Although propranolol has been used to treat theophylline-induced hypotension (Biberstein et al, 1984), its use cannot be routinely recommended.
    a) It may be hazardous in asthmatic patients.
    2) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) Administration of propranolol 0.6 milligram/kilogram intravenously following infusion of aminophylline delayed the onset of seizures (from 46 to 55 minutes) and increased the total dose of aminophylline tolerated in rats (from 385 to 473 milligrams/kilogram) (Schneider et al, 1987).
    b) In another study in mice, propranolol, in doses up to 20 milligrams/kilogram intraperitoneally, prevented tonic, but not clonic seizure activity (Czuczwar et al, 1987). Propranolol may be hazardous in asthmatic and COPD patients.
    D) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) MONITOR CARDIAC FUNCTION closely. Use standard anti-arrhythmic therapy as needed.
    2) VERAPAMIL: 3 milligrams of intravenous verapamil was associated with prolongation of the cycle length and termination of ventricular tachycardia following a ventricular premature beat that was unresponsive to lidocaine therapy in a patient treated with theophylline (58 micrograms/milliliter in plasma) (Taniguchi et al, 1989).
    E) ESMOLOL
    1) CASE REPORTS
    a) UNSTABLE SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA - Was successfully treated in a theophylline toxic patient (107.4 micrograms/milliliter) with a continuous esmolol infusion, 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute, after a 500 microgram/kilogram bolus.
    1) Initial treatment with carotid massage, valsalva, adenosine, verapamil, digoxin, and cardioversion was unsuccessful (Vanden Hoek et al, 1991).
    b) Tachycardia and hypotension, thought to be secondary to theophylline toxicity, responded immediately to administration of esmolol in a 28-year-old male who ingested 5,400 milligrams anhydrous theophylline 8 hours prior to admission (Seneff et al, 1990).
    1) OTHER DRUGS INGESTED - 12.5 milligrams flurazepam, 750 milligrams desipramine, 750 milligrams doxepin, and 60 milligrams lorazepam were ingested 24 hours prior to admission.
    2) ADULT DOSE/ADMINISTRATION - Prepare a solution containing 10 milligrams esmolol per milliliter of a compatible intravenous solution (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    a) CAUTION - Esmolol is a short-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent with negative inotropic effects. Esmolol may be hazardous in patients with bronchospastic disease (asthmatics, COPD) (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996) or myocardial depression (Gomez et al, 1992).
    b) LOADING DOSE - Infuse 500 micrograms/kilogram of body weight for 1 minute (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    c) MAINTENANCE DOSE - Follow loading dose with infusion of 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute for 4 minutes (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    d) EVALUATION OF RESPONSE - If inadequate response to initial loading dose and 4-minute maintenance dose, repeat loading dose (infuse 500 micrograms/kilogram for 1 minute) followed by a maintenance infusion of 100 micrograms/kilogram/minute for 4 minutes. Reevaluate therapeutic effect.
    1) If response is inadequate, repeat loading dose and increase the maintenance dose by increments of 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute, administered as above (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    2) Unlike propranolol, esmolol will not reverse theophylline-induced hypokalemia and other toxicities which appear to be beta-2 mediated.
    e) END-POINT OF THERAPY - When desired heart rate or safety end-point (blood pressure) is reached:
    1) Omit loading dose and reduce incremental dose in maintenance infusion from 25 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute or lower;
    2) Or increase interval between titration steps from 5 to 10 minutes (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    f) USUAL ADULT DOSAGE - 25 to 200 micrograms/kilogram/minute (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996)
    3) PEDIATRIC DOSE/ADMINISTRATION - Safety and effectiveness of esmolol has not been established in children (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    4) DISCONTINUATION - Taper dose prior to discontinuation. Follow manufacturer's recommendations for switching to oral agent if appropriate. Esmolol has been well tolerated for up to 48 hours of use (Prod Info Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride, 1996).
    5) A swine study compared the use of propranolol, esmolol, and methoxamine for the treatment of the hypotension and tachycardic effects associated with acute theophylline overdose. Only methoxamine demonstrated significant ability to reverse the hypotensive and tachycardic effects (Martin et al, 1991).
    F) ADENOSINE
    1) This short-acting agent is effective treatment for supraventricular tachycardias.
    2) Because theophylline's mechanism of pharmacologic and toxic effects may involve adenosine antagonism, this agent may be useful therapy in theophylline-induced supraventricular tachycardias.
    3) In a rat model of severe aminophylline intoxication, pretreatment with intracerebroventricular or intravenous adenosine increased the dose of aminophylline required to induce seizures and delayed the onset of seizures (Shannon & Maher, 1994; Shannon & Maher, 1994; Shannon & Maher, 1995).
    4) In a mouse model of severe aminophylline intoxication, treatment with adenosine 5 minutes after aminophylline infusion delayed the onset of seizures and death (Wang, 1994).
    G) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) EPHEDRINE - Hypertension may occur following acute overdose of ephedrine. Nitroprusside or phentolamine may be considered (USPDI , 2001).
    2) HYPERTENSION: Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension (no end organ damage), pharmacologic treatment is generally not necessary. Sedation with benzodiazepines may be helpful in agitated patients with hypertension and tachycardia. For severe hypertension sodium nitroprusside is preferred. Labetalol, nitroglycerin, and phentolamine are alternatives. See main treatment section for doses.
    3) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/INDICATIONS
    a) Useful for emergent treatment of severe hypertension secondary to poisonings. Sodium nitroprusside has a rapid onset of action, a short duration of action and a half-life of about 2 minutes (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007) that can allow accurate titration of blood pressure, as the hypertensive effects of drug overdoses are often short lived.
    4) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/DOSE
    a) ADULT: Begin intravenous infusion at 0.1 microgram/kilogram/minute and titrate to desired effect; up to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute may be required (American Heart Association, 2005). Frequent hemodynamic monitoring and administration by an infusion pump that ensures a precise flow rate is mandatory (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). PEDIATRIC: Initial: 0.5 to 1 microgram/kilogram/minute; titrate to effect up to 8 micrograms/kilogram/minute (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    5) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/SOLUTION PREPARATION
    a) The reconstituted 50 mg solution must be further diluted in 250 to 1000 mL D5W to desired concentration (recommended 50 to 200 mcg/mL) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection, 2004). Prepare fresh every 24 hours; wrap in aluminum foil. Discard discolored solution (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    6) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) Severe hypotension; headaches, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps; thiocyanate or cyanide toxicity (generally from prolonged, high dose infusion); methemoglobinemia; lactic acidosis; chest pain or dysrhythmias (high doses) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). The addition of 1 gram of sodium thiosulfate to each 100 milligrams of sodium nitroprusside for infusion may help to prevent cyanide toxicity in patients receiving prolonged or high dose infusions (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    7) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Monitor blood pressure every 30 to 60 seconds at onset of infusion; once stabilized, monitor every 5 minutes. Continuous blood pressure monitoring with an intra-arterial catheter is advised (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    8) PHENTOLAMINE/INDICATIONS
    a) Useful for severe hypertension, particularly if caused by agents with alpha adrenergic agonist effects usually induced by catecholamine excess (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    9) PHENTOLAMINE/ADULT DOSE
    a) BOLUS DOSE: 5 to 15 mg IV bolus repeated as needed (U.S. Departement of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 2004). Onset of action is 1 to 2 minutes with a duration of 10 to 30 minutes (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    b) CONTINUOUS INFUSION: 1 mg/hr, adjusted hourly to stabilize blood pressure. Prepared by adding 60 mg of phentolamine mesylate to 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection; continuous infusion ranging from 12 to 52 mg/hr over 4 days has been used in case reports (McMillian et al, 2011).
    10) PHENTOLAMINE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg/dose (maximum of 5 mg per dose) intravenously every 5 minutes until hypertension is controlled, then every 2 to 4 hours as needed (Singh et al, 2012; Koch-Weser, 1974).
    11) PHENTOLAMINE/ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Adverse events can include orthostatic or prolonged hypotension, tachycardia, dysrhythmias, angina, flushing, headache, nasal congestion, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009; Prod Info Phentolamine Mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard, 2005).
    12) CAUTION
    a) Phentolamine should be used with caution in patients with coronary artery disease because it may induce angina or myocardial infarction (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Charcoal hemoperfusion increases theophylline clearance in overdose and is associated with a theophylline half life of approximately 2 hours (Burgess & Sargious, 1995).
    2) INDICATIONS: Should be considered if the plasma theophylline concentration exceeds 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter in CHRONIC overdose (222 to 333 micromoles/liter) and/or significant signs of intoxication are present (Chang et al, 1980; Hendeles & Weinberger, 1980; Sahney et al, 1983).
    3) Other authors (Goldberg et al, 1986a; Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992) have suggested that hemoperfusion should be performed prophylactically if:
    a) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 80 micrograms/milliliter after acute overdose.
    b) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 60 micrograms/milliliter after chronic overdose, or
    c) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 50 micrograms/milliliter and the patient is 60 years of age or older or has significant liver disease or congestive heart failure, or the patient is unable to tolerate oral activated charcoal therapy.
    4) SEVERE SYMPTOMS (cardiac dysrhythmias, hemodynamic instability, seizures) generally occur at levels greater than 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter in CHRONIC intoxications and at levels greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter in ACUTE intoxications (Olson et al, 1983) Gaudrealt et al, 1983; (Shannon, 1993).
    a) Hemoperfusion may alter the course of major adverse events if performed early, ie, before seizure or dysrhythmia onset (Shannon & Woolf, 1992a).
    5) ENHANCED RECOVERY - Enhanced recovery without neurologic defects was seen in three pediatric patients with severe theophylline toxicity (theophylline levels of 60 to 180 micrograms/milliliter (333 to 999 micromoles/liter)) when hemoperfused early after seizure onset (Sahney et al, 1983).
    6) PEDIATRIC - Consider in pediatric patients who deteriorate despite conventional therapy or in those patients with serum concentrations greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter (444 to 555 micromoles/liter) (Gaudreault et al, 1983).
    7) SUSTAINED-RELEASE - HEMOPERFUSION (HP) may also be indicated following massive overdose with sustained-release theophylline products due to rising and sustained toxic plasma concentrations (Connell et al, 1982).
    8) REBOUND - Cessation of HP may lead to small (5 micrograms/milliliter) rebound toxic theophylline levels (Connell et al, 1982).
    9) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Associated with hemoperfusion utilizing a coated-charcoal cartridge included a transient decrease in platelets, calcium, and blood pressure and one case of possible hemolysis (Gallagher et al, 1987).
    10) CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMOPERFUSION -
    a) In one case of theophylline intoxication continuous arteriovenous hemoperfusion was associated with a theophylline clearance of 193 milliliters/minute (Lin & Jeng, 1995).
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis also has been reported to increase the elimination rate of theophylline with clearances of 33 milliliters/minute (Levy, 1977), 74 milliliters/minute (Snodgrass, 1980), 88 milliliters/minute (Lee, 1979), and 128 milliliters/minute (Bouffard et al, 1993) in several case reports.
    a) Newer dialysis membranes appear to provide theophylline clearance rates similar to those achieved with hemoperfusion (Bouffard et al, 1993; Nogue S, Munne P & Nadel P et al, 1994).
    2) INDICATIONS: Should be considered if the plasma theophylline concentration exceeds 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter in CHRONIC overdose (222 to 333 micromoles/liter) and/or significant signs of intoxication are present (Chang et al, 1980; Hendeles & Weinberger, 1980; Sahney et al, 1983).
    3) Other authors (Goldberg et al, 1986a; Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992) have suggested that hemodialysis should be performed prophylactically if:
    a) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 80 micrograms/milliliter after acute overdose.
    b) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 60 micrograms/milliliter after chronic overdose, or
    c) The serum theophylline concentration is greater than 50 micrograms/milliliter and the patient is 60 years of age or older or has significant liver disease or congestive heart failure, or the patient is unable to tolerate oral activated charcoal therapy.
    4) SEVERE SYMPTOMS (cardiac dysrhythmias, hemodynamic instability, seizures) generally occur at levels greater than 40 to 60 micrograms/milliliter in CHRONIC intoxications and at levels greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter in ACUTE intoxications (Olson et al, 1983) Gaudrealt et al, 1983; (Shannon, 1993).
    a) Hemodialysis may alter the course of major adverse events if performed early, i.e., before seizure or arrhythmia onset (Shannon & Woolf, 1992a).
    5) PEDIATRIC - Consider in pediatric patients who deteriorate despite conventional therapy or in those patients with serum concentrations greater than 80 to 100 micrograms/milliliter (444 to 555 micromoles/liter) (Gaudreault et al, 1983).
    6) SUSTAINED-RELEASE - Hemodialysis may also be indicated following massive overdose with sustained-release theophylline products due to rising and sustained toxic plasma concentrations (Connell et al, 1982).
    7) EPHEDRINE - It is NOT known whether ephedrine is removable by dialysis (USPDI , 2001).
    C) CLEARANCE RATES
    TABLE 1
    THEOPHYLLINE CLEARANCE WITH DIALYSIS
            AND HEMOPERFUSION
    

    1)
       HEMOPERFUSION          CLEARANCE
    
    Chang et al, 198090 mL/min
    Russo, 1979100 mL/min
    Lawyer et al, 1978225 mL/min
    Zwillich et al, 1975140 mL/min

    2)
      HEMODIALYSIS
    
    Levy et al, 197733 mL/min
    Lee et al, 197988 mL/min
    Snodgrass et al, 198074 mL/min
    Bouffard et al, 1993128 mL/min
    Nogue et al, 199492 to 137 mL/min

    3)
     CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMOPERFUSION
    
    Lin & Jeng, 1995           193 mL/min
    

    4)
      PERITONEAL DIALYSIS - NOT EFFECTIVE
    
    Miceli et al, 1980          5 mL/min
    Weinberger &         10 to 49 mL/min
     Hendeles, 1980
    

    5)
      ENDOGENOUS CLEARANCE
    

    1) Non-smoking Adult 40 mL/kg/hr
    2) Smoking Adult 65 mL/kg/hr
    6)
      ACTIVATED CHARCOAL, MULTIPLE DOSE
    
        95 to 145 mL/kg/hr
    

    D) COMBINED HEMOPERFUSION/HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Combined use of hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion, along with oral activated charcoal, for 7 hours was successful in decreasing the serum theophylline level from 1000 micromoles/liter to about 100 micromoles/liter (from 180 micrograms/milliliter to 18 micrograms/milliliter) (Stegmayr, 1988).
    2) Combined treatment cannot be expected to increase the total body clearance more than for hemoperfusion alone (Ahlmen et al, 1984).
    E) EXCHANGE TRANSFUSION
    1) Exchange transfusion is less effective in removing substantial amounts of drug, but may be useful in infants in whom hemodialysis and hemoperfusion is difficult.
    2) Several reports suggest single and triple volume exchange transfusions are a potentially useful alternative to hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, and repetitive oral charcoal in the critically ill newborn and premature neonate suffering from the theophylline overdose (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992; Henry et al, 1991; Barazarte et al, 1992) Osborn et al, 1993).
    3) CASE REPORT
    a) A newborn with a serum theophylline level of 93.3 micrograms/milliliter was treated with triple volume whole blood exchange transfusion (total exchange volume 600 milliliters) successfully.
    b) Pre-exchange elimination half-life of theophylline was 39 hours; postexchange was 9.2 hours. Serum theophylline concentration was decreased to 37.8 micrograms/milliliter (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992).
    F) PLASMAPHERESIS
    1) Plasmapheresis should not be used instead of hemoperfusion or hemodialysis in theophylline intoxication as it offers little compared with endogenous clearance (Bania et al, 1992).
    2) Laussen et al (1991) report a 14-year-old female treated with plasmapheresis (using a PF1000 plasmafilter and a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit), charcoal hemoperfusion, and multiple dose activated charcoal for severe theophylline toxicity.
    a) TREATMENT - The serum theophylline concentration fell from 100 to 64 milligrams/liter during the 3 hour procedure (Laussen et al, 1991). She subsequently underwent 6 hours of charcoal hemoperfusion.
    b) The serum theophylline concentration at the end of the charcoal hemoperfusion procedure was 17.5 milligrams/liter.
    c) Approximately 3 hours into the hemoperfusion, she was extubated and begun on 12.5 grams of activated charcoal and 7.5 grams of magnesium sulfate by nasogastric tube every hour until charcoal appeared in stool.
    d) ESTIMATED HALF-LIFE - The calculated elimination half-lives during plasmapheresis and hemoperfusion were 1.4 hours and 1.7 hours, respectively.
    G) DIURESIS
    1) Since only small amounts of unchanged theophylline are excreted by the kidneys, forced diuresis is ineffective in enhancing elimination.
    H) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    1) Peritoneal dialysis was ineffective, with theophylline clearances of 5 milliliters/minute (Miceli, 1980) and 10 to 49 milliliters/minute (Hendeles & Weinberger, 1980) being reported.
    I) PREGNANCY
    1) If the fetus develops severe distress, then hemoperfusion or hemodialysis of the mother should be considered.
    2) Prematurity and low birth weights in newborns, hypotension and vaginal bleeding in the mother, and premature contractions or labor during or immediately after hemodialysis have been reported.
    3) Hemodialysis in pregnant patients should include the use of isolated ultrafiltration for volume removal, the support of blood pressure with albumin, the use of a dialysate containing glucose and bicarbonate, and the use of low-dose heparin regimen (Nissenson, 1981).
    4) Hemodialysis performed on a 21-year-old pregnant woman resulted in mild uterine contractions immediately following dialysis which terminated spontaneously after four hours.
    a) Fetal heart tones were not audible during dialysis or for fourteen hours after dialysis but were heard again approximately 30 hours after admission.
    b) The patient delivered a normal, full-term viable baby four months later (Kurtz et al, 1966).

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) A 15-year-old girl ingested ephedrine 330 mg, theophylline 3600 mg, and phenobarbital 240 mg. Presenting symptoms included sweating, flushing, vomiting, sinus tachycardia, and hyperglysuria. Symptoms persisted for 18 hours (Jarrett, 1966).

Summary

    A) POTENTIALLY TOXIC DOSE - Ingestions of more than 10 mg/kg of theophylline, particularly in combination with ephedrine, should be considered potentially toxic.
    B) MONITORING - Patients with levels above 30 mcg/mL (166 mcmol/L) should be observed and monitored until the levels are therapeutic.
    C) ESTIMATED SERUM LEVEL - Approximate serum level of non-sustained release products by doubling the theophylline dose in mg/kg. The serum concentration is in mcg/mL (mcg/mL x 5.55 = mcmol/L).

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    1) THEOPHYLLINE
    a) VARIOUS FORMULATIONS
    1) LIQUID: Contains 150 mg theophylline/15 mL flavored based; bronchodilation is achieved through bowel absorption only. Liquid, generally given for an acute attack only. Adults - 40 mL (2.5 tablespoonfuls) for acute attack; maintenance therapy (for first 6 doses) - 25 mL (1.5 tablespoonfuls) before breakfast, at 3 pm and at bedtime. Remaining therapy should be at 15 mL doses at the same times (Prod Info Aerolate Liquid(R), 2001).
    2) EXTENDED RELEASE: It is used in patients with relatively continuous or recurring symptoms; NOT intended for acute episodes of bronchospasm (associated with asthma, chronic bronchitis, or emphysema). Also, requires patients that metabolize theophylline at a normal or slow rate for once daily dosing. INITIAL dosing: Adults and Children >45 kg: 300-400 milligrams/day once daily; then 400 to 600 milligrams/day once daily as needed. Doses greater than 600 mg should be titrated according to blood levels (Prod Info Theo-24(R), theophylline, anhydrous, 1998).
    a) Another extended release formulation is based on twice daily dosing. INITIAL dosing: Adults and Children >45 kg: 300 milligrams/day divided every 12 hours; if tolerated may increase to 400 milligrams/day divided every 12 hours; if tolerated for 3 days may increase to 600 milligrams/day divided every 12 hours. Serum monitoring is recommended (Prod Info Theo-Dur(R) extended release tablets (theophylline, anhydrous), 1997).
    3) CONTROLLED-RELEASE - available in 400 and 600 mg tablets (NOTE: scored tablets can be split) and can be taken once a day in the morning or evening. Should be taken with meals; do NOT chew or crush. Individual peak serum theophylline concentrations should guide therapy. INITIAL dosing: Adults and Children >45 kg: 300 to 400 milligrams/day; followed by 400 to 600 milligrams/day; titrate doses greater than 600 mg as needed (Prod Info Unicontin(R), controlled-release system (theophylline, anhydrous), 1998).
    2) EPHEDRINE
    a) NOTE: Ephedrine has been used as a bronchodilator; however, it has been generally replaced by safer and more effective medications in both adults and children (USPDI , 2001).
    b) Administer IM, IV bolus or subcutaneously; give undiluted injection. May also be given orally.
    c) IV, IM, or SC: 12.5 to 25 milligrams/dose repeated as indicated per patient response; NOT to exceed 150 milligrams/day (USPDI, 1999).
    d) ORAL: 25 to 50 milligrams every 3 to 4 hours as needed (USPDI, 1999).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) A fatality was reported in a 2-year-old girl with a history of ingestion of 200 milligrams ephedrine, 1000 milligrams (83 milligrams/kilogram) of theophylline, and 65 milligrams of phenobarbital in a combination product (Gardner et al, 1950).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) LIFE-THREATENING EVENTS -
    a) A prospective study of 144 cases of theophylline poisoning found a correlation with age, peak theophylline level, and life-threatening events (seizures and severe cardiac dysrhythmias) using a stepwise logistic regression technique (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1989).
    b) Peak theophylline level predicts life-threatening events (LTE) with acute (LTE 117.6 micrograms/milliliter vs no LTE 60.7 micrograms/milliliter, p<0.0001) but not chronic (LTE 48.1 micrograms/milliliter vs no LTE 48.6 micrograms/milliliter) theophylline intoxication in this model (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1989).
    c) Age was found to predict life-threatening events in patients with chronic (LTE 63.3 years vs no LTE 31.0 years, p<0.0001) but not acute (LTE 18.1 years vs no LTE 20.1 years) theophylline intoxication in this model (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1989).
    2) LIFE-THREATENING EVENTS AND ELEVATED LEVELS -
    a) The risk of toxicity appears greater in patients with theophylline concentrations above 25 micrograms/milliliter or with significant coincident risk factors (Emerman et al, 1990).
    b) RISK FACTORS INCLUDE - Age, congestive heart failure, ICU admission, prior seizures, or prior antiarrhythmic therapy.
    c) This information was derived from a retrospective study of 214 hospitalized patients with 558 episodes of elevated serum theophylline concentrations (Emerman et al, 1990).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) INFANTS - Can achieve serum concentrations compatible with toxicity from as few as 1 to 2 tablets of many of the common commercial preparations.
    b) LIFE-THREATENING TOXICITY LEVELS
    1) Toxicity of theophylline is only generally related to the serum concentration.
    2) Life-threatening toxicity was not predictable by serum levels in some studies (Aitken & Martin, 1987), but was predicted by levels of 117.6 micrograms/milliliter after acute overdose in another study (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1989a).
    3) A retrospective review of 20 inpatients with theophylline levels above 20 micrograms/milliliter found no correlation between the theophylline levels and the incidence of gastrointestinal, central nervous system, or metabolic abnormalities (Bertino & Walker, 1987).
    2) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    a) THERAPEUTIC SERUM LEVELS (Theophylline) -
    1) 10 to 20 micrograms/milliliter (55 to 111 micromoles/liter).
    2) Ingestions of more than 10 milligrams/kilogram of theophylline, particularly in combination with ephedrine, should be considered potentially toxic.
    b) TOXIC SERUM LEVELS (Theophylline) -
    1) At serum levels above 20 micrograms/milliliter (111 micromoles/liter), there is an increased risk of toxicity.
    2) Patients with levels above 30 micrograms/milliliter (166 micromoles/liter) should be observed at least until the level returns to the therapeutic range.
    3) Levels above 60 micrograms/milliliter (333 micromoles/liter) is felt by some authors to warrant hemoperfusion, especially in cases of chronic intoxication.
    3) CASE REPORTS
    a) AGE FACTORS
    1) A study of 28 cases of acute PEDIATRIC theophylline overdoses reports that children and young adults rarely develop seizures or life threatening dysrhythmias with theophylline serum concentrations less than 80 micrograms/milliliter (444 micromoles/liter) (Gaudreault et al, 1983).
    2) Among 125 pediatric patients with theophylline overdoses, 10% developed seizures or dysrhythmias (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1992). The mean peak theophylline levels were 100 micrograms/milliliter for acute cases and 42 micrograms/milliliter for chronic and acute-on-chronic cases.
    3) Seizures, tachycardia, hypokalemia, and hypotension were seen after "acute" overdoses with serum levels greater than 100 micrograms/milliliter, but patients with "chronic" accidental overdoses seized at levels greater than 40 micrograms/milliliter (Olson et al, 1983).
    4) Dean and Brown (1982) reported a case of a 58-year-old woman who survived a theophylline level of 203 micrograms/milliliter (1126 micromoles/liter) following ingestion of 12.8 grams of anhydrous theophylline without hemoperfusion.
    a) The patient experienced ventricular ectopy, supraventricular tachycardia, hypotension, two grand mal seizures, bradycardia, and loss of consciousness.
    b) SUSTAINED RELEASE
    1) Overdose with SUSTAINED RELEASE/ACTION preparations appear to result in severe and prolonged CNS and cardiovascular toxicity (Connell et al, 1982).
    2) A 62-year-old developed a peak theophylline level of 144 micrograms/milliliter following an ingestion of 12 grams of sustained release theophylline.
    a) Treatment included charcoal hemoperfusion. The level of theophylline decreased temporarily, then rebounded and remained relatively constant at greater than 80 micrograms/milliliter over 40 hours. This occurred despite multiple courses of hemoperfusion with an extraction ratio of 0.65. The patient expired 5 days postingestion with multiple organ failure (Amitai & Lovejoy, 1987).
    4) ANIMAL DATA
    a) Animal experiments in rats reveal that CFS concentrations correlate with the site of action responsible for theophylline-induced seizures, more closely than serum or homogenized brain (Razman & Levy, 1986).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Ephedrine-theophylline combinations have been used in the treatment of asthma since at least 1940.
    1) Additive bronchodilator effect was postulated and later rationalized by the independent actions on elevating cyclic 3'5' AMP, the probable mediator of beta-adrenergic activity in the lung.
    B) As early as 1941, however, synergism for toxicity was demonstrated in mice (Richards, 1941). This was confirmed in a later study reported in 1950 (Gardner et al, 1950).
    C) Additive protective effect from the effects of anaphylaxis in guinea pigs was demonstrable only when theophylline was used in suboptimal doses.
    D) A study in asthmatic children demonstrated no significant additive clinical effect from the fixed dose combination of ephedrine and theophylline while synergism for adverse medication effects was striking.
    E) The increased adverse medication effects occurred with the combination at the same serum concentration previously tolerated when theophylline was given alone.

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Ahlmen J, Heath A, & Herlitz H: Treatment of oral theophylline poisoning. Acta Med Scand 1984; 216:423-426.
    3) Aitken ML & Martin TR: Life-threatening theophylline toxicity is not predictable by serum levels. Chest 1987; 91:10-14.
    4) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    5) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    6) Amitai Y & Lovejoy FH Jr: Characteristics of vomiting associated with acute sustained release theophylline poisoning: implications for management with oral activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol 1987; 25:539-554.
    7) Amitai Y & Lovejoy FH Jr: Hypokalemia in acute theophylline poisoning. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:214-218.
    8) Amitai Y, Yeung A, & Moye J: Repetitive oral activated charcoal and control of emesis in severe theophylline toxicity. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105:386-387.
    9) Anderson W, Youl B, & Mackay IR: Acute theophylline intoxication. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:1143-1145.
    10) Anon: Theophylline profile. Report V of the Senate Commission for Clinical-Toxicological Analysis, VCH Publishers, Deerfield Beach, FL, 1985.
    11) Aranda JV, Sitar DS, & Parsons WD: Pharmacokinetic aspects of theophylline in premature newborns. N Engl J Med 1976; 295:413-416.
    12) Arimori K & Nakano M: Transport of theophylline from blood to the intestinal lumen following IV administration to rats. J Pharmacobiodyn 1985; 8:324-327.
    13) Arwood LL, Dasta JF, & Friedman C: Placental transfer of theophylline: two case reports. Pediatrics 1979; 63:844-846.
    14) Atkinson SW, Young Y, & Trotter GA: Treatment with activated charcoal complicated by gastrointestinal obstruction requiring surgery. Br Med J 1992; 305:563.
    15) Aviram M, Tal A, & Ben-Zvi Z: Monitoring theophylline therapy using citric acid-stimulated saliva in infants and children with asthma. Pediatrics 1987; 80:894-897.
    16) Baba S: Studies on the metabolism in man by use of 2H-labeled drug. Quantitative determination of the metabolites of 1-ephedrine (arom-2(5)) in man. J Pharm Soc Japan 1972; 92:1569.
    17) Baker MD: Theophylline toxicity in children. J Pediatr 1986; 109:538-542.
    18) Bania TC, Hoffman RS, & Howland MA: Plasmapheresis for theophylline intoxication (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:330.
    19) Barazarte V, Rodriguez Z, & Ceballos S: Exchange transfusion in a case of severe theophylline poisoning. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:524.
    20) Berlinger GW, Spector R, & Goldberg MJ: Enhancement of theophylline clearance by oral activated charcoal. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 33:351-354.
    21) Bernard S: Severe lactic acidosis following theophylline overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:1135-1137.
    22) Bertino JS & Walker JW Jr: Reassessment of theophylline toxicity. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:757-760.
    23) Biberstein MP, Ziegler MG, & Ward DM: Use of B-blockade and hemoperfusion for acute theophylline poisoning. West J Med 1984; 141:485-490.
    24) Bigler ED: Theophylline neurotoxicity resulting diffuse brain damage (letter). Dev Med Child Neurol 1991; 33:179-183.
    25) Blake KV, Massey KL, & Hendeles L: Relative efficacy of phenytoin and phenobarbital for the prevention of theophylline-induced seizures in mice. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:1024-1028.
    26) Bouffard J, Lardet G, & Tissot S: Theophylline intoxication: toxicokinetic evaluation of hemodialysis (letter). Intens Care Med 1993; 19:122-124.
    27) Brashear RE, Aronoff GR, & Brier RA: Activated charcoal in theophylline intoxication. J Lab Clin Med 1985; 106:242-245.
    28) Bronstein AC, Sawyer DR, & Rumack BH: Theophylline intoxication in a premature infant: multiple dose activated charcoal therapy (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1984; 26:404.
    29) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    30) Brown SGA & Prentice DA: Ondansetron in the treatment of theophylline overdose (letter). Med J Aust 1992; 156:512.
    31) Brubacher JR, Levine B, & DeRoos F: Intestinal pseudo-obstruction in severe theophylline toxicity treated with massive doses of activated charcoal (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:523.
    32) Buckley BM, Braithwaite RA, & Vale JA: Theophylline poisoning. Lancet 1983; 2:618.
    33) Burgess E & Sargious P: Charcoal hemoperfusion for theophylline overdose: case report and proposal for predicting treatment time. Pharmacotherapy 1995; 15:621-624.
    34) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    35) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    36) Chang TMS, Espinosa-Melendez E, & Fancoeur TE: Albumin-collodion activated charcoal hemoperfusion in the treatment of severe theophylline intoxication in a three year old child. Pediatrics 1980; 65:811-814.
    37) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    38) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    39) Chyka PA & Seger D: Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:721-741.
    40) Chyka PA, Holley JE, & Mandrell TD: Correlation of drug pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of multiple-dose activated charcoal therapy. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:356-362.
    41) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    42) Chyka PA: Multiple-dose activated charcoal and enhancement of systemic drug clearance: summary of studies in animals and human volunteers. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33(5):399-405.
    43) Connell JMC, McGeachie JF, & Knepil: Self-poisoning with sustained release aminophylline: secondary rise in serum theophylline concentration after charcoal hemoperfusion. Br Med J 1982; 284:943.
    44) Cooney DO: In vitro adsorption of phenobarbital, chlorpheniramine maleate, and theophylline by four commercially available activated charcoal suspensions. Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:213-217.
    45) Corser BC, Youngs C, & Baughman RP: Prolonged toxicity following massive ingestion of sustained-release theophylline preparation. Chest 1985; 88:749-750.
    46) Czuczwar SJ, Janusz W, & Wamil A: Inhibition of aminophylline-induced convulsions in mice by antiepileptic drugs and other agents. Eur J Pharmacol 1987; 144:309-315.
    47) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    48) Daly D & Taylor JN: Ondansetron in theophylline overdose (letter). Anaesth Intens Care 1993; 21:474-475.
    49) Davis R, Ellsworth A, & Justus RE: Reversal of theophylline toxicity using oral activated charcoal. J Fam Pract 1985; 20:73-75.
    50) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    51) Emerman CL, Devlin C, & Connors AF: Risk of toxicity in patients with elevated theophylline levels. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:643-648.
    52) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    53) Frederiksen MC, Ruo TI, & Chow MJ: Theophylline pharmacokinetics in pregnancy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1986; 40:321-328.
    54) Gal P, Miller A, & McCue JD: Oral activated charcoal to enhance theophylline elimination in an acute overdose. JAMA 1984; 251:3130-3131.
    55) Gallagher EJ, Howland MA, & Greenblatt H: Hemolysis following treatment of theophylline overdose with coated charcoal hemoperfusion. J Emerg Med 1987; 5:19-22.
    56) Gardner RA, Hansen AE, & Ewing PL: Unexpected fatality in a child from accidental consumption of antiasthmatic preparation containing ephedrine, theophylline and phenobarbital. Texas State J Med 1950; 516-520.
    57) Gaudreault P, Wason S, & Lovejoy FH: Acute pediatric theophylline overdose: a summary of 28 cases. J Pediatrics 1983; 102:474-476.
    58) Ghannoum M & Gosselin S: Enhanced poison elimination in critical care. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20(1):94-101.
    59) Giacoia G, Jusko WJ, & Menke J: Theophylline pharmacokinetics in premature infants with apnea. J Pediatr 1976; 89:829-832.
    60) Ginoza GW, Strauss AA, & Iskra MK: Potential treatment of theophylline toxicity by high surface area activated charcoal. J Pediatr 1987; 111:140-142.
    61) Goldberg MJ, Park GD, & Berlinger WG: Treatment of theophylline intoxication. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 78:811-817.
    62) Goldberg MJ, Spector R, & Miller G: Phenobarbital improves survival in theophylline-intoxicated rabbits. Clin Toxicol 1986a; 24:203-211.
    63) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    64) Gomez HF, Brent JA, & Munoz DC: Charcoal stercolith with intestinal perforation in a patient treated for amitriptyline ingestion. J Emerg Med 1994; 12:57-60.
    65) Gomez HF, Ziller A, & McKinney P: Negative inotropic effects of intravenous esmolol in a theophylline-toxic patient (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:331.
    66) Goulbourne B & Cisek JE: Small-bowel obstruction secondary to activated charcoal and adhesions. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24:108-110.
    67) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    68) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    69) Hall KW, Dobson KE, & Dalton JG: Metabolic abnormalities associated with intentional theophylline overdose. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101:457-462.
    70) Hansen CE: Psychoses in chronic ephedrine addiction. Nord Med 1968; 80:1545.
    71) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    72) Harsch HH: Aspiration of activated charcoal. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:318.
    73) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    74) Hendeles L & Weinberger M: Poisoning patients with intravenous theophylline. Am J Hosp Pharm 1980; 37:49-50.
    75) Henry GC, Wax PM, & Howland MA: Exchange transfusion for the treatment of a theophylline overdose in a premature neonate (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1991; 33:354.
    76) Herridge CF & A'Brook MF: Ephedrine psychosis. Br Med J 1968; 2:160.
    77) Huang JD: Kinetics of theophylline clearance in gastrointestinal dialysis with charcoal. J Pharm Sci 1987; 76:525-527.
    78) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    79) Ilkhanipour K, Yealy DM, & Krenzelok EP: The comparative efficacy of various multiple-dose activated charcoal regimens. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:298-300.
    80) Jacobs MH & Senior RM: Theophylline toxicity due to impaired theophylline degradation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 110:342-345.
    81) Jarrett PEM: Franol poisoning (letter). Lancet 1966; 2:1190.
    82) Kadlec GJ, Jarboe CH, & Pollard SJ: Acute theophylline intoxication: biphasic first order elimination kinetics in a child. Ann Allergy 1978; 41:337-339.
    83) Kane FJ Jr & Florenzano R: Psychosis accompanying use of bronchodilator compound (letter). JAMA 1971; 215:2116.
    84) Kearney TE, Manoguerra AS, & Curtis GP: Theophylline toxicity and the beta-adrenergic system. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:766-769.
    85) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    86) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    87) Koch-Weser J: Hypertensive emergencies. N Engl J Med 1974; 290:211.
    88) Kolander SA, Nydegger CC, & Porter RS: T wave inversion associated with severe theophylline toxicity. Chest 1989; 96:429-431.
    89) Kulig K, Bar-Or D, & Rumack BH: Intravenous theophylline poisoning and multiple dose charcoal in an animal model. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:842-846.
    90) Kurtz GG, Michael UF, & Morosi HJ: Hemodialysis during pregnancy. Arch Intern Med 1966; 118:30-32.
    91) Labovitz E & Spector S: Placental theophylline transfer in pregnant asthmatics. JAMA 1982; 247:786-788.
    92) Laussen P, Shann F, & Butt W: Use of plasmapheresis in acute theophylline toxicity. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:288-290.
    93) Leventhal LJ, Kochar G, & Feldman NH: Lactic acidosis in theophylline overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7:417-418.
    94) Lim DT, Singh P, & Nourtsis S: Absorption inhibition and enhancement of elimination of sustained-release theophylline tablets by oral activated charcoal. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1303-1307.
    95) Lin J-L & Jeng L-B: Critical, acutely poisoned patients treated with continuous arteriovenous hemoperfusion in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:75-80.
    96) Lloyd DM, Payne SPK, & Tomson CRV: Acute compartment syndrome secondary to theophylline overdose (letter). Lancet 1990; 2:312.
    97) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    98) Loosmore S & Armstrong D: Do-Do abuse. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157:278-281.
    99) MacDonald JB, Jones HM, & Cowan RA: Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure after theophylline overdose. Lancet 1985; 1:932-933.
    100) Mahutte CK, True RJ, & Michiels TM: Increased serum theophylline clearance with orally administered activated charcoal. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128:820-822.
    101) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    102) Mauro LS, Nawarskas JJ, & Mauro VF: Misadventures with activated charcoal and recommendations for safe use. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28(7-8):915-924.
    103) McMillian WD, Trombley BJ, Charash WE, et al: Phentolamine continuous infusion in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011; 68(2):130-134.
    104) Mina B, Dym JP, & Kuepper F: Fatal inhalational anthrax with unknown source of exposure in a 61-year-old woman in New York City. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 287:858-862.
    105) Minton NA, Glucksman E, & Henry JA: Prevention of drug absorption in simulated theophylline overdose. Hum & Exp Toxicol 1995; 14:170-174.
    106) Mizutani T, Naito H, & Oohashi N: Rectal ulcer with massive hemorrhage due to activated charcoal treatment in oral organophosphate poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:385-386.
    107) Nicot G, Charmes JP, & Lachatre G: Theophylline toxicity risks and chronic renal failure. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1989; 27:398-401.
    108) Nissenson AR: The use of hemodialysis to treat end-stage renal failure during pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94:670-671.
    109) Noetzel MJ: Theophylline neurotoxicity resulting in significant unilateral brain damage. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27:242-248.
    110) Nogue S, Munne P & Nadel P et al: The efficacy of haemodialysis in theophylline poisoning (abstract). EAPCCT XVI Int Congress Vienna, 1994.
    111) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    112) Olson KR, Benowitz N, & Woo O: Clinical features of acute and chronic theophylline intoxication (Abstract A-1). Vet Hum Toxicol 1983; 25(Suppl 1):53.
    113) Olson KR, Benowitz NL, & Woo OF: Theophylline overdose: acute single ingestion versus chronic repeated overmedication. Am J Emerg Med 1985; 3:386-394.
    114) Paloucek FP & Rodvold KA: Evaluation of theophylline overdoses and toxicities. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:135-144.
    115) Park GD, Radomski L, & Goldberg MJ: Effects of size and frequency of oral doses of charcoal on theophylline clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34:663-666.
    116) Park GD, Spector R, & Goldberg MJ: Effect of the surface area of activated charcoal on theophylline clearance. J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 24:289-292.
    117) Parr MJ, Anaes FC, & Day AC: Theophylline poisoning - a review of 64 cases. Intens Care Med 1990; 16:394-398.
    118) Parr MJA & Willatts SM: Fatal theophylline poisoning with rhabdomyolysis. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:557-559.
    119) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    120) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    121) Product Information: Brevibloc(R), esmolol hydrochloride. DuPont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware, 1996.
    122) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, Sodium Nitroprusside injection for IV infusion. Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL, 2007.
    123) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection, sodium nitroprusside injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    124) Product Information: Neo-Synephrine(R), phenylephrine. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, 1996.
    125) Product Information: Phentolamine Mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard, phentolamine mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard. Sandoz Canada (per manufacturer), Boucherville, QC, 2005.
    126) Product Information: Theo-24(R), theophylline, anhydrous. UCB Pharma, Inc, Smyrna, GA, 1998.
    127) Product Information: Theo-Dur(R) extended release tablets (theophylline, anhydrous). Key Pharmaceuticals Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, 1997.
    128) Product Information: Unicontin(R), controlled-release system (theophylline, anhydrous). Purdue Frederick Co, Stamford, CT, 1998.
    129) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    130) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    131) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    132) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    133) Radomski L, Park GD, & Goldberg MJ: Model for theophylline overdose treatment with oral activated charcoal. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984; 35:402-408.
    134) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    135) Ray MJ, Padin DR, & Condie JD: Charcoal bezoar. Small-bowel obstruction secondary to amitriptyline overdose therapy. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33:106-107.
    136) Razman I & Levy G: Kinetics of drug action in disease states. XVI. Pharmacodynamics of theophylline-induced seizures in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1986; 236:708-713.
    137) Rhoney D & Peacock WF: Intravenous therapy for hypertensive emergencies, part 1. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66(15):1343-1352.
    138) Richards RK: Toxicity of theophylline-ephedrine-barbiturate mixtures (Abstract). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1941; 72:33.
    139) Roberts JR, Carney S, & Boyle SM: Ondansetron quells drug-resistant emesis in theophylline poisoning. Am J Emerg Med 1993; 11:609-610.
    140) Rosen JP, Danish M, & Ragni MC: Theophylline pharmacokinetics in the young infant. Pediatr 1979; 64:248-251.
    141) Rumpf DW, Wagner H, & Criee CP: Rhabdomyolysis after theophylline overdose. Lancet 1985; 1:1451-1452.
    142) Russo ME: Management of theophylline intoxication with charcoal-column hemoperfusion. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:24-26.
    143) Ryan T, Coughlan G, & McGing P: Ketosis, a complication of theophylline toxicity. J Intern Med 1989; 226:277-278.
    144) Sage TA, Jones WN, & Clark RF: Ondansetron in the treatment of intractable nausea associated with theophylline toxicity. Ann Pharmacother 1993; 27:584-585.
    145) Sahney S, Abarzua J, & Sessums L: Hemoperfusion in theophylline neurotoxicity. Pediatrics 1983; 71:615-619.
    146) Sawyer WT, Caravati EM, & Ellison MJ: Hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, and acidosis after intentional theophylline overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1985; 3:408-411.
    147) Schneider SM, Borok Z, & Michelson EA: Beta-blockade for acute theophylline-induced seizures. Vet Hum Toxicol 1987; 26:451-453.
    148) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    149) Seneff M, Scott J, & Friedman B: Acute theophylline toxicity and the use of esmolol to reverse cardiovascular instability. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:671-673.
    150) Sessler CN & Cohen MD: Cardiac arrhythmias during theophylline toxicity: a prospective continuous electrocardiographic study. Chest 1990; 98:672-678.
    151) Sessler CN, Glauser FL, & Cooper KR: Treatment of theophylline toxicity with oral activated charcoal. Chest 1987; 87:325-329.
    152) Shaner DM, McCurdy SA, & Herring MO: Treatment of status epilepticus: a prospective comparison of diazepam and phenytoin versus phenobarbital and optional phenytoin. Neurology 1988; 38:202-207.
    153) Shannon M & Lovejoy FH Jr: Effect of acute versus chronic intoxication on clinical features of theophylline poisoning in children. J Pediatr 1992; 121:125-130.
    154) Shannon M & Lovejoy FH Jr: Hypokalemia after theophylline intoxication: the effects of acute vs chronic poisoning. Arch Intern Med 1989a; 149:2725-2729.
    155) Shannon M & Lovejoy FH Jr: Life-threatening events after theophylline intoxication: a prospective analysis of 144 cases (abstract 55). Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:446.
    156) Shannon M, Amitai Y, & Lovejoy FH Jr: Multiple dose activated charcoal for theophylline poisoning in young infants. Pediatrics 1987; 80:368-370.
    157) Shannon M: Predictors of major toxicity after theophylline overdose. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:1161-1167.
    158) Shannon MW & Maher TJ: Anticonvulsant effects of intracerebroventricular adenosine in theophylline-induced seizures (abstract48). Vet Hum Toxicol 1994.
    159) Shannon MW & Maher TJ: Anticonvulsant effects of intracerebroventricular adenosine in theophylline-induced seizures. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:723-724.
    160) Shannon MW & Woolf A: Does extracorporeal removal alter the course of major toxicity after theophylline intoxication (abstract)?. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992a; 34:325.
    161) Shaw LM, Fields L, & Mayock R: Factors influencing theophylline serum protein binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 32:490-496.
    162) Singh D, Akingbola O, Yosypiv I, et al: Emergency management of hypertension in children. Int J Nephrol 2012; 2012:420247.
    163) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    164) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    165) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    166) Stegmayr BG: On-line hemodialysis and hemoperfusion in a girl intoxicated by theophylline. Acta Med Scand 1988; 223:565-567.
    167) Stone WE & Javid MJ: Aminophylline and imidazole as convulsants. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 1980; 248:120-131.
    168) Strauss AA, Modanlou HD, & Komatsu G: Theophylline toxicity in a preterm infant: selected clinical aspects. Pediatr Pharmacol 1985; 5:209-212.
    169) Taniguchi A, Ohe T, & Shimorura K: Theophylline-induced ventricular tachycardia in a patient with chronic lung disease: sensitivity to verapamil (letter). Chest 1989; 96:958-959.
    170) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    171) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    172) Titley OG & Williams N: Theophylline toxicity causing rhabdomyolysis and acute compartment syndrome. Int Care Med 1992; 18:129-130.
    173) True RJ, Berman JM, & Mahutte CK: Treatment of theophylline toxicity with oral activated charcoal. Crit Care Med 1984; 12:113-114.
    174) Tsiu SJ, Self TH, & Burns R: Theophylline toxicity: update. Ann Allergy 1990; 64:241-257.
    175) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. As accessed 2012-06-20.
    176) USPDI : Drug Information for the Health Care Professional, (Internet version). US Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. Rockville, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    177) USPDI: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional, Vol 1, 19th Ed, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc, Rockville, MD, 1999.
    178) Uden DL, Schaber DE, & Wyat RA: Apparent inconsistent theophylline absorption from sustained release capsules. Clin Pediatr 1987; 26:285-287.
    179) Vale JA, Krenzelok EP, & Barceloux GD: Position statement and practice guidelines on the use of multi-dose activated charcoal in the treatment of acute poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:731-751.
    180) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    181) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    182) Van Mieghem W, Stevens E, & Cosemans J: Ephedrine-induced cardiopathy. Br Med J 1978; 1:816.
    183) Vanden Hoek T, Murphy C, & Aks S: The use of esmolol to reverse unstable supraventricular tachycardia in a theophylline toxic patient (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:390.
    184) Wang RY: Anticonvulsant effects of adenosine in aminophylline induced seizures (abstract 49). Vet Hum Toxicol 1994.
    185) Weinberger M & Ginchansky E: Dose-dependent kinetics of theophylline disposition in asthmatic children. J Ped 1977; 9:820-824.
    186) Welling PG: Urinary excretion of ephedrine in man without pH control following oral administration of three commercial ephedrine sulfate preparations. J Pharm Sci 1971; 60:1629.
    187) Whitehouse AM & Duncan JM: Ephedrine psychosis rediscovered. Br J Psychiatr 1987; 150:258-261.
    188) Wight JP, Laurence S, & Holt S: Rhabdomyolysis with hyperkalaemia after aminophylline overdose. Med Sci Law 1987; 27:103-105.
    189) Wilkinson GR & Beckett AH: Absorption, metabolism & excretion of the ephedrines in man. I. The influence of urinary pH and urine volume output. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968; 162:139.
    190) Wilkinson GR & Beckett AH: Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of the ephedrines in man. J Pharm Sci 1968a; 57:1933.
    191) Wooten MR, Khangure MS, & Murphy MJ: Intracerebral hemorrhage and vasculitis related to ephedrine abuse. Ann Neurol 1983; 13:337-340.