MOBILE VIEW  | 

TAPENTADOL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Tapentadol is a centrally-acting synthetic opioid analgesic that exerts its analgesic effect by binding to mu-opioid receptors and inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake. It is subject to diversion and abuse.

Specific Substances

    1) BN-200
    2) CG-5503
    3) CAS 175591-23-8
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C14-H23-N-O-HCl (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Tapentadol is available as 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg tablets (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    B) USES
    1) Tapentadol is indicated for treatment of moderate to severe acute pain (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Tapentadol is used for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Tapentadol exerts its analgesic effect by binding to mu-opioid receptors and by inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake. It appears to be 18 times less potent than morphine in binding to the mu-opioid receptor.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: The exact mechanism of analgesic effect is unknown, but therapeutic and toxic effects are likely mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimetic. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Although rarely reported, overdose may occur and can be life-threatening.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: The most common adverse effects with therapeutic administration of tapentadol include dizziness, somnolence, nausea, and vomiting.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting, and pinpoint pupils.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Tapentadol is classified as pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of tapentadol in pregnant women. Neonatal withdrawal syndrome, which is life-threatening, may occur in infants born to mothers who chronically used tapentadol during pregnancy. Tapentadol is not recommended during and immediately prior to labor, as opioids cross the placenta and if used during labor, may produce respiratory depression and psychophysiologic effects in neonates. In animal studies, embryofetal toxicity (reduced fetal viability, skeletal delays) and malformations, including gastroschisis/thoracogastroschisis, amelia/phocomelia, cleft palate, ablepharia, encephalopathy, and spina bifida were observed in rabbits. However, no teratogenic effects in rats were observed in other animal studies.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Tapentadol plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may not detect synthetic opioids such as tapendatol and are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of tapentadol toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may only need observation.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for severe toxicity (respiratory or CNS depression). Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Tapentadol overdoses can be life-threatening. Activated charcoal should be considered early after a significant oral ingestion, if a patient can protect their airway and is without significant signs of toxicity. If a patient is displaying signs of moderate to severe toxicity, do NOT administer activated charcoal because of the risk of aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE, an opioid antagonist, is the specific antidote. Naloxone can be given intravascularly, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intranasally or endotracheally. The usual dose is 0.4 to 2 mg IV. In patients with suspected opioid dependence, incremental doses of 0.2 mg IV should be administered, titrated to reversal of respiratory depression and coma, to avoid precipitating acute opioid withdrawal. Doses may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg. Very high doses are rarely needed.
    2) Naloxone can precipitate withdrawal in an opioid-dependent patient, which is usually not life-threatening; however it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia. Treatment includes ensuring adequate oxygenation, and administering intravenous benzodiazepines; propofol or barbiturates may be indicated, if seizures persist.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Acute lung injury can develop in a small proportion of patients after an acute opioid overdose. The pathophysiology is unclear. Patients should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after overdose to evaluate for hypoxia and/or the development of acute lung injury.
    H) HYPOTENSION
    1) Hypotension is often reversed by naloxone. Initially, treat with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    I) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of the large volume of distribution.
    J) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above the therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, those with deliberate ingestions, and all children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility.
    a) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe patients for at least 4 hours (maximum serum concentrations are reached at 1.25 hours after therapeutic dose) as symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    b) EXTENDED RELEASE: Observe patients for at least 8 to 12 hours (maximum serum concentrations are reached between 3 and 6 hours after therapeutic dose) as symptoms will likely develop during this period.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Those with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a extended release formulation has likely been taken; additional doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting. EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients with even mild to moderate opioid effects, and those who require naloxone after ingestion of a extended release formulation should be admitted.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    K) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Naloxone's duration of effect may be much shorter than the duration of effect for tapentadol. Other causes of altered mental status must be ruled out, such as hypoxia or hypoglycemia.
    L) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) The mean absolute bioavailability following administration of a single dose of tapentadol under fasting conditions is approximately 32% due to extensive first-pass metabolism. Volume of distribution is 540 +/- 98 liters. Approximately 97% of tapentadol is metabolized with extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism occurring mainly via phase 2 pathways (conjugation with glucuronic acid). IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Maximum serum concentrations are reached at 1.25 hours. The mean terminal half-life is 4 hours. EXTENDED RELEASE: Maximum serum concentrations are reached between 3 and 6 hours. Terminal half-life is 5 hours.
    M) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Opioids slow GI motility, which may lead to prolonged absorption.
    N) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Overdose with other sedating agents (eg, ethanol, benzodiazepine/barbiturate, antipsychotics, other opioids); overdose with central alpha 2 agonists (eg, clonidine, tizanidine, imidazoline decongestants); CNS infection; intracranial hemorrhage; hypoglycemia or hypoxia.
    O) DRUG INTERACTIONS
    1) Coingestion of other CNS depressant drugs (eg, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ethanol) will increase the CNS and respiratory depressant effects.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Toxic dose is not established, and varies with the tolerance of the individual. PEDIATRIC: A 16-month-old girl ingested a reported 100 mg (2 tablets) of tapentadol and was admitted to an intensive care setting with dyspnea, drowsiness/lethargy, pallor, and vomiting; she recovered with oxygen therapy. Another infant, a 9-month old, ingested a reported 50 mg (1 tablet) and developed coma and respiratory depression requiring naloxone and IV fluids; the child recovered completely.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: The usual recommended dose is 50 to 100 mg every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain, with the second dose, on the first day of dosing, administered as early as one hour after the first dose if needed. Subsequent dosing is maintained at 4 to 6 hours. MAXIMUM: 700 mg on the first day of therapy, and 600 mg/day on subsequent days.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Tapentadol is used for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Tapentadol exerts its analgesic effect by binding to mu-opioid receptors and by inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake. It appears to be 18 times less potent than morphine in binding to the mu-opioid receptor.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: The exact mechanism of analgesic effect is unknown, but therapeutic and toxic effects are likely mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimetic. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Although rarely reported, overdose may occur and can be life-threatening.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: The most common adverse effects with therapeutic administration of tapentadol include dizziness, somnolence, nausea, and vomiting.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting, and pinpoint pupils.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MIOSIS may occur with tapentadol overdose in adults (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009) and pediatric patients inadvertently exposed to tapentadol (Borys et al, 2015).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RESPIRATORY ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) With tapentadol overdose, respiratory depression progressing to respiratory arrest may occur (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    B) DECREASED RESPIRATORY FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a retrospective observational study using data from the National Poison Data System from November 2008 to December 2013, 104 pediatric cases (17 years of age or less) of tapentadol (alone) ingestion were identified. Of the 104 cases, 93 were unintentional exposures. Most patients (n=80) were 6 years-old or younger and 2 year-olds were the most common (60.6%) age group. No clinical effects were reported in 62 (59.6%) patients; 34 (32.7%) had minor effects, 8 (7.7%) had moderate or major effects. No deaths occurred. Common clinical symptoms included drowsiness and lethargy, which occurred in 30 (28.8%) patients. Respiratory depression, coma, dyspnea, pallor, vomiting, edema, hives/welts, drowsiness, slurred speech, pruritus and hallucinations developed in patients that experienced moderate or major effects (Borys et al, 2015).
    1) In one case, an infant, a 9-month old, ingested a reported 50 mg (1 tablet) of tapentadol and developed coma and respiratory depression requiring naloxone and IV fluids. No permanent sequelae was reported (Borys et al, 2015).
    C) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a retrospective observational study using data from the National Poison Data System from November 2008 to December 2013, 104 pediatric cases (17 years of age or less) of tapentadol (alone) ingestion were identified. Of the 104 cases, 93 were unintentional exposures. Most patients (n=80) were 6 years-old or younger and 2 year-olds were the most common (60.6%) age group. No clinical effects were reported in 62 (59.6%) patients; 34 (32.7%) had minor effects, 8 (7.7%) had moderate or major effects. No deaths occurred. Common clinical symptoms included drowsiness and lethargy, which occurred in 30 (28.8%) patients. Respiratory depression, coma, dyspnea, pallor, vomiting, edema, hives/welts, drowsiness, slurred speech, pruritus and hallucinations developed in patients that experienced moderate or major effects (Borys et al, 2015).
    1) In one case, a 16-month-old girl ingested a reported 100 mg (2 tablets) of tapentadol and was admitted to an intensive care setting with dyspnea, drowsiness/lethargy, pallor, and vomiting; she recovered with oxygen therapy (Borys et al, 2015).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, dizziness was reported in 24% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 8% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    B) DROWSY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) ADULT: In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, somnolence was reported in 15% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 3% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    b) PEDIATRIC: In a retrospective observational study using data from the National Poison Data System from November 2008 to December 2013, 104 pediatric cases (17 years of age or less) of tapentadol (alone) ingestion were identified. Of the 104 cases, 93 were unintentional exposures. Most patients (n=80) were 6 years-old or younger and 2 year-olds were the most common (60.6%) age group. No clinical effects were reported in 62 (59.6%) patients; 34 (32.7%) had minor effects, 8 (7.7%) had moderate or major effects. No deaths occurred. Common clinical symptoms included drowsiness and lethargy, which occurred in 30 (28.8%) patients (Borys et al, 2015).
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Coma may occur following tapentadol overdose (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    b) PEDIATRIC/CASE SERIES: In a retrospective observational study using data from the National Poison Data System from November 2008 to December 2013, 104 pediatric cases (17 years of age or less) of tapentadol (alone) ingestion were identified. Of the 104 cases, 93 were unintentional exposures. Most patients (n=80) were 6 years-old or younger and 2 year-olds were the most common (60.6%) age group. No clinical effects were reported in 62 (59.6%) patients; 34 (32.7%) had minor effects, 8 (7.7%) had moderate or major effects. No deaths occurred. Respiratory depression, coma, dyspnea, pallor, vomiting, edema, hives/welts, drowsiness, slurred speech, pruritus and hallucinations developed in patients that experienced moderate or major effects (Borys et al, 2015)
    1) In one case, a 9-month old, ingested a reported 50 mg (1 tablet) of tapentadol and developed coma and respiratory depression requiring naloxone and IV fluids. No permanent sequelae was reported (Borys et al, 2015).
    D) INSOMNIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, insomnia was reported in 2% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with less than 1% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    E) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures may occur with tapentadol overdose (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting has occurred following overdose
    b) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, nausea was reported in 30% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 13% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    c) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, vomiting was reported in 18% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 4% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea and vomiting has occurred in pediatric patients exposed to tapentadol (Borys et al, 2015).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, constipation was reported in 8% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 3% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    C) APTYALISM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, dry mouth was reported in 4% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with less than 1% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    D) DECREASE IN APPETITE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, decreased appetite was reported in 2% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with none of the patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, pruritus was reported in 5% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with 1% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    B) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a pooled analysis of 9 phase 2/3 clinical studies in adults, hyperhidrosis was reported in 3% of patients who received tapentadol (n=2178) compared with less than 1% of patients who received placebo (n=619) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Tapentadol is classified as pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of tapentadol in pregnant women. Neonatal withdrawal syndrome, which is life-threatening, may occur in infants born to mothers who chronically used tapentadol during pregnancy. Tapentadol is not recommended during and immediately prior to labor, as opioids cross the placenta and if used during labor, may produce respiratory depression and psychophysiologic effects in neonates. In animal studies, embryofetal toxicity (reduced fetal viability, skeletal delays) and malformations, including gastroschisis/thoracogastroschisis, amelia/phocomelia, cleft palate, ablepharia, encephalopathy, and spina bifida were observed in rabbits. However, no teratogenic effects in rats were observed in other animal studies.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RABBITS: Studies of pregnant rabbits administered subQ doses of tapentadol at 4, 10, or 24 mg/kg/day (0.2, 0.6, and 1.85 times, respectively, the plasma exposure of immediate-release tapentadol and 0.3, 0.8, and 2.5 times, respectively, the plasma exposure of extended-release tapentadol at the maximum recommended human dose based AUC) showed embryofetal toxicity (reduced fetal viability, skeletal delays) and malformations, including gastroschisis/thoracogastroschisis, amelia/phocomelia, and cleft palate at doses equal to or greater than 10 mg/kg/day. Ablepharia, encephalopathy, and spina bifida were seen at a dose of 24 mg/kg/day (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    2) RATS: In animal studies, no teratogenic effects were observed when pregnant rats were administered tapentadol at subQ doses of 10, 20, or 40 mg/kg/day (up to 1 time and 1.36 times the plasma exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 700 mg/day of immediate-release tapentadol and 500 mg/day of extended-release (ER) tapentadol, respectively, based AUC) during embryofetal organogenesis (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified tapentadol (both immediate-release and extended-release) as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    2) There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of the effects of tapentadol in pregnant women. Life-threatening neonatal withdrawal syndrome may occur with prolonged use of tapentadol during pregnancy. Because opioids are known to cross the placental barrier, and may cause respiratory depression and psychophysiologic effects in neonates, along with prolonged labor, tapentadol use is not recommended immediately prior to or during labor. It is recommended that tapentadol only be used in pregnant women when the potential benefits to the mother justify the potential risks to the fetus. It is also recommended that infants who have been exposed to tapentadol be carefully monitored (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    B) NEONATAL WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME
    1) Prolonged use of tapentadol during pregnancy may result in neonatal withdrawal syndrome and dependence in the neonate shortly following birth. Symptoms of irritability, poor feeding, diarrhea, vomiting, failure to gain weight, hyperactivity, abnormal sleep patterns, high-pitched cry, rigidity, tremors, and seizures in the infant may occur. This condition may become life-threatening without early recognition, treatment, and management, and varies in terms of onset, duration, and severity based on the duration of use, dose of last maternal use, and rate of elimination of the drug by the newborn (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    C) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION
    1) Opioids, such as tapentadol, cross the placenta and if used immediately prior to or during labor, may produce respiratory depression and psychophysiologic effects in neonates (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    D) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: Embryofetal toxicity including transient delays in skeletal maturation (eg, reduced ossification) were observed at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day and was associated with significant maternal toxicity. Oral administration of tapentadol at doses of 20, 50, 150, or 300 mg/kg/day (up to 1.7 times and 2.28 times the plasma exposure of immediate-release and ER tapentadol, respectively, at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) in pregnant and lactating rats during the late gestation and early postnatal period, did not influence physical or reflex development, the outcome of neurobehavioral tests, or reproductive parameters. Development delays (incomplete ossification, significant weight reduction and weight gain in pups) at doses equal to or greater than 150 mg/kg/day were associated with maternal toxicity. In addition, postnatal pup mortality was seen in maternal doses equal to or greater than 150 mg/kg/day through day 4 (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) Data is limited/insufficient regarding the excretion of tapentadol in human or animal breast milk. However, based on physicochemical and pharmacodynamic/toxicological information on tapentadol, the excretion of breast milk and the risk to the child cannot be excluded (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Fertility was not altered with IV administration of tapentadol to male and female rats at doses of 3, 6, and 12 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.5 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human doses based on extrapolation from toxicokinetic analyses in a separate, 4-week, IV study in rats) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013a).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) MICE: There was no increase in the incidence of tumors in mice who were given tapentadol, via oral gavage, at dosages of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day over a 2-year period (up to 0.2 times the plasma exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD)) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).
    2) RATS: There was no increase in the incidence of tumors in rats who were given tapentadol, in their diet, at dosages of 10, 50, 125, and 250 mg/kg/day over a 2-year period (up to 0.2 times and 0.6 times in male and female rats, respectively, the plasma exposure at the MRHD) (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Genotoxicity

    A) Tapentadol is not mutagenic in bacteria. A chromosomal aberration test in V79 cells indicated that tapentadol was clastogenic with metabolic activation; however, a repeat test was negative in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Tapentadol plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may not detect synthetic opioids such as tapendatol and are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of tapentadol toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Methods

    A) IMMUNOASSAY
    1) In a study of 11 patients taking confirmed therapeutic doses of tapentadol (up to 600 mg/day; median dose 200 mg/kg), NO false-positive urine screening for methadone or opiate occurred using the Sylva EMIT II(R) immunoassay. In this study, the standard cutoff concentration of 300 ng/mL for methadone was used (Mullins et al, 2015).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Those with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a extended release formulation has likely been taken; additional doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    B) EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients with even mild to moderate opioid effects, and those who require naloxone after ingestion of a extended release formulation should be admitted.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above the therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid naive.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, those with deliberate ingestions, and all children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility.
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe patients for at least 4 hours (maximum serum concentrations are reached at 1.25 hours after therapeutic dose) as symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    2) EXTENDED RELEASE: Observe patients for at least 8 to 12 hours (maximum serum concentrations are reached between 3 and 6 hours after therapeutic dose (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER extended-release oral tablets, 2012)) as symptoms will likely develop during this period.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Tapentadol plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may not detect synthetic opioids such as tapendatol and are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of tapentadol toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) PREHOSPITAL: Tapentadol overdoses can be life-threatening. Activated charcoal should be considered early after a significant oral ingestion, if a patient can protect their airway and is without significant signs of toxicity. If a patient is displaying signs of moderate to severe toxicity, do NOT administer activated charcoal because of the risk of aspiration.
    B) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    1) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    2) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    3) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    4) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    C) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    1) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    a) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    2) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    a) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    3) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    a) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    b) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    4) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    a) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    b) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    c) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    5) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    a) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    b) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    c) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    d) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    6) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    a) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    b) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    c) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    d) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    e) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    1) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    2) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    3) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    4) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    f) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    g) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    7) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    a) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    b) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    c) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    d) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    e) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    8) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    a) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    D) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    B) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    1) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    C) CHARCOAL DOSE
    1) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    a) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    a) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    b) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    2) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    3) Tapentadol plasma concentrations are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may not detect synthetic opioids such as tapentadol, and are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    4) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of tapentadol toxicity is uncertain.
    5) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT and/or lumbar puncture to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.
    B) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    C) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    D) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Hypotension should initially be treated with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    3) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    4) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    E) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia. If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Administer intravenous, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or propofol if seizures persist.
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    F) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of the large volume of distribution.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Toxic dose is not established, and varies with the tolerance of the individual. PEDIATRIC: A 16-month-old girl ingested a reported 100 mg (2 tablets) of tapentadol and was admitted to an intensive care setting with dyspnea, drowsiness/lethargy, pallor, and vomiting; she recovered with oxygen therapy. Another infant, a 9-month old, ingested a reported 50 mg (1 tablet) and developed coma and respiratory depression requiring naloxone and IV fluids; the child recovered completely.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: The usual recommended dose is 50 to 100 mg every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain, with the second dose, on the first day of dosing, administered as early as one hour after the first dose if needed. Subsequent dosing is maintained at 4 to 6 hours. MAXIMUM: 700 mg on the first day of therapy, and 600 mg/day on subsequent days.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) SOLUTION
    1) 50 to 100 mg (2.5 to 5 mL) orally every 4 to 6 hours; on the first day of dosing, the second dose may be administered as early as 1 hour after the first dose, with subsequent dosing maintained every 4 to 6 hours; MAX: 700 mg on first day of therapy and 600 mg on subsequent days (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral solution, 2014).
    B) TABLETS
    1) EXTENDED-RELEASE
    a) OPIOID-NAIVE AND OPIOID-INTOLERANT: 50 mg orally twice daily (approximately every 12 hours); MAX: 500 mg/day (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    b) ADMINISTRATION: Take tablets whole; DO NOT crush, chew or dissolve (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    2) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE
    a) 50 to 100 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours; on the first day of dosing, the second dose may be administered as early as 1 hour after the first dose, with subsequent dosing maintained every 4 to 6 hours; MAX: 700 mg on the first day of therapy and 600 mg/day on subsequent days (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) Safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral solution, 2014; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, 2013; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, 2014).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) PEDIATRIC
    1) CASE SERIES: In a retrospective observational study using data from the National Poison Data System from November 2008 to December 2013, 104 pediatric cases (17 years of age or less) of tapentadol (alone) ingestion were identified. Of the 104 cases, 93 were unintentional exposures. Most patients (n=80) were 6 years-old or younger and 2 year-olds were the most common (60.6%) age group. No clinical effects were reported in 62 (59.6%) patients; 34 (32.7%) had minor effects, 8 (7.7%) had moderate or major effects. No deaths occurred. Common clinical symptoms included drowsiness and lethargy, which occurred in 30 (28.8%) patients. Other clinical findings included nausea, vomiting, miosis, tachycardia, respiratory depression, and dizziness/vertigo. Respiratory depression, coma, dyspnea, pallor, vomiting, edema, hives/welts, drowsiness, slurred speech, pruritus and hallucinations developed in patients that experienced moderate or major effects. Five children required observation only, 2 children received IV fluids, oxygen, naloxone and one child received antihistamines and steroids for an episode of edema and hives/welts. A 16-month-old girl ingested a reported 100 mg (2 tablets) of tapentadol and was admitted to an intensive care setting with dyspnea, drowsiness/lethargy, pallor, and vomiting; she recovered with oxygen therapy. Another infant, a 9-month old, ingested a reported 50 mg (1 tablet) and developed coma and respiratory depression requiring naloxone and IV fluids. No permanent sequelae was reported (Borys et al, 2015).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) A 40-year-old man with a history of depression and anxiety was found deceased following a suspected overdose of tapentadol. Heart blood was examined because urine and peripheral blood could not be obtained. Tapentadol concentration was 6600 ng/mL in heart blood which was more than 20 times the upper limit of the therapeutic range (5 to 300 ng/mL). Other results included an alkaline drug screen that was positive for diphenhydramine (0.6 mg/L), amitriptyline (1.1 mg/L), nortriptyline (less than 0.1 mg/L), and citalopram (0.3 mg/L). It was determined that the cause of death was due to tapentadol intoxication; the cause of death was undetermined (Franco et al, 2014).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Tapentadol exerts its analgesic activity by binding to mu-opioid receptors and inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake. It appears to be 18 times less potent than morphine in binding to the mu-opioid receptor (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info NUCYNTA(R) ER extended-release oral tablets, 2012).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) The exact mechanism of analgesic effect is unknown, but therapeutic and toxic effects are likely mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimetic. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects (Nelson, 2006; Jaffe & Martin, 1990).

Molecular Weight

    A) 257.80 (Prod Info NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, 2009)

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    3) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    4) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    5) Borys D, Stanton M, Gummin D, et al: Tapentadol toxicity in children. Pediatrics 2015; 135(2):e392-e396.
    6) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    7) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    8) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    9) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    10) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    11) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    12) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    13) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    14) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    15) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    16) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    17) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    18) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    19) Franco DM, Ali Z, Levine B, et al: Case report of a fatal intoxication by Nucynta. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2014; 35(4):234-236.
    20) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    21) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    22) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    23) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    24) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    25) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    26) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    27) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    28) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    29) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    30) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    31) Jaffe JH & Martin WR: Opioid analgesics and antagonists. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 8th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 485-521.
    32) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    33) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    34) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    35) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    36) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    37) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    38) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    39) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    40) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    41) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    42) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    43) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    44) Mullins ME, Hock K, & Scott MG: Does therapeutic use of tapentadol cause false-positive urine screens for methadone or opiates?. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(5):493-494.
    45) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    46) Nelson L: Opioids. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    47) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    48) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    49) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    50) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    51) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    52) Product Information: NUCYNTA(R) ER extended-release oral tablets, tapentadol extended-release oral tablets. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2012.
    53) Product Information: NUCYNTA(R) ER oral extended-release tablets, tapentadol oral extended-release tablets. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2014.
    54) Product Information: NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, tapentadol oral immediate-release tablets. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2013.
    55) Product Information: NUCYNTA(R) oral immediate-release tablets, tapentadol oral immediate-release tablets. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2013a.
    56) Product Information: NUCYNTA(R) oral solution, tapentadol oral solution. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2014.
    57) Product Information: NUCYNTA(TM) immediate-release oral tablets, tapentadol immediate-release oral tablets. PriCara, Raritan, NJ, 2009.
    58) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    59) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    60) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    61) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    62) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    63) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    64) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    65) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    66) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    67) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    68) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    69) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    70) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    71) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    72) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    73) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    74) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    75) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    76) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    77) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    78) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    79) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    80) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    81) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    82) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    83) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.