MOBILE VIEW  | 

SORAFENIB

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that prevents tumor growth by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis.

Specific Substances

    1) Sorafenib tosylate
    2) BAY 43-9006
    3) 2-Pyridinecarboxamide (9CI)
    4) CAS 284461-73-0
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C21-H16-Cl-F3-N4-O3 x C7-H8-O3-S (sorafenib tosylate) (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Sorafenib is available as 200 mg (equivalent to 274 mg of sorafenib tosylate) film-coated tablets (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) USES
    1) Sorafenib, a kinase inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, differentiated thyroid carcinoma refractory to radioactive iodine treatment (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Sorafenib is used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, differentiated thyroid carcinoma refractory to radioactive iodine treatment.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Sorafenib is a kinase inhibitor that decreases tumor cell proliferation in vitro.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure may occur.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Common adverse effects with sorafenib therapy include fatigue, hypertension, rash/desquamation, hand-foot skin reaction, hypophosphatemia, alopecia, gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), bleeding at all sites and sensory neuropathy.
    2) Other adverse effects that may occur with sorafenib therapy include weight loss, dry skin, constipation, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, joint pain and headache.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) OVERDOSE: Sorafenib overdose information is limited. Doses of 800 mg twice daily, given during clinical trials, have resulted in diarrhea and grade 3 hypertension, dyspnea and rash/desquamation.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Hypertension is a common occurrence with sorafenib therapy.
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Doses of 800 mg twice daily resulted in the development of grade 3 hypertension in one patient.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Sorafenib is classified as an FDA pregnancy category D. Based on the teratogenic and embryo-fetal toxicity observed in animals that received doses significantly below those recommended for humans, sorafenib may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Sorafenib was shown to be excreted in the milk of lactating rats. Although fertility studies have not been conducted in animals, degeneration of the epididymis, testicles, prostate, and seminal vesicles, central necrosis of the corpora lutea, arrested follicular development, tubular degeneration of the testes, and oligospermia were observed in animals in repeat-dose toxicity studies.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Serum sorafenib levels are not clinically useful in guiding management following overdose, or widely available in clinical practice.
    B) Hematologic effects, such as hemorrhage (including the gastrointestinal and/or respiratory tract), thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia are relatively common with sorafenib therapy. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    C) Monitor vital signs.
    D) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    E) Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of mucositis.
    F) Monitor serum amylase and lipase in patients with abdominal pain or as indicated.
    G) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    H) Monitor renal function and liver enzymes following a significant exposure or as indicated.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat persistent nausea and vomiting with antiemetics as needed. Correct any significant fluid and/or electrolyte abnormalities in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea. Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic treatment is generally not necessary. Sedation with benzodiazepines in agitated patients with hypertension and tachycardia. Consider administering colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) as these patients may be a risk to develop significant neutropenia. RASH: Use topical emollient of 2% ketoconazole or topical steroids in patients with facial erythematous rash. Onset is usually 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy and it typically fades or disappears with continued therapy.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Monitor vital signs regularly. For severe hypertension, nitroprusside is preferred. Labetalol, nitroglycerin and phentolamine are alternatives. Administer colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) in patients that appear to be at risk for severe neutropenia. An increased risk of bleeding has been associated with sorafenib therapy; bleeding from any site has been fatal in some cases. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Decontamination may not be necessary following a minor exposure. Consider activated charcoal if the ingestion is recent, the patient is not vomiting and they can maintain their airway.
    2) HOSPITAL: Administer activated charcoal following a significant recent ingestion and protect the airway as needed.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway management is unlikely to be necessary following a minor exposure. Ensure adequate ventilation and intubate the patient if they are unable to protect their airway or if unstable dysrhythmias.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Administer colony stimulating factors following a significant overdose as these patients are at risk for severe neutropenia. Filgrastim: 5 mcg/kg/day IV or subQ. Sargramostim: 250 mcg/m(2)/day IV over 4 hours OR 250 mcg/m(2)/day SubQ once daily. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count daily for evidence of bone marrow suppression until recovery has occurred. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage. Patients with severe neutropenia should be in protective isolation. Transfer to a bone marrow transplant center should be considered.
    G) NEUTROPENIA
    1) Prophylactic therapy with a fluoroquinolone should be considered in high risk patients with expected prolonged (more than 7 days), and profound neutropenia (ANC 100 cells/mm(3) or less).
    H) FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
    1) If fever (38.3 C) develops during the neutropenic phase (ANC 500 cells/mm(3) or less), cultures should be obtained and empiric antibiotics started. HIGH RISK PATIENT (anticipated neutropenia of 7 days or more; unstable; significant comorbidities): IV monotherapy with either piperacillin-tazobactam; a carbapenem (meropenem or imipenem-cilastatin); or an antipseudomonal beta-lactam agent (eg, ceftazidime or cefepime). LOW RISK PATIENT (anticipated neutropenia of less than 7 days; clinically stable; no comorbidities): oral ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate.
    I) STOMATITIS
    1) Treat mild mucositis with bland oral rinses with 0.9% saline, sodium bicarbonate, and water. For moderate cases with pain, consider adding a topical anesthetic (eg, lidocaine, benzocaine, dyclonine, diphenhydramine, or doxepin). Treat moderate to severe mucositis with topical anesthetics and systemic analgesics. Patients with mucositis and moderate xerostomia may receive sialagogues (eg, sugarless candy/mints, pilocarpine/cevimeline, or bethanechol) and topical fluorides to stimulate salivary gland function. Consider prophylactic antiviral and antifungal agents to prevent infections. Topical oral antimicrobial mouthwashes, rinses, pastilles, or lozenges may be used to decrease the risk of infection.
    J) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) There is no information regarding the effectiveness of hemodialysis or hemoperfusion for the removal of sorafenib from plasma; however, due to its high protein binding (99.5%), it is anticipated that hemodialysis would NOT be effective.
    K) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: An asymptomatic adult that has inadvertently taken an extra dose can be monitored at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with an inadvertent moderate exposure, symptomatic patients or children should be observed and treated until symptoms resolve. Outpatient laboratory analysis should be arranged until bone marrow recovery, if the patient is not admitted.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with an intentional or significant overdose should be closely monitored in an inpatient setting, with frequent monitoring of vital signs (every 4 hours for the first 24 hours), and daily monitoring of CBC with differential until bone marrow suppression is resolved.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult an oncologist, medical toxicologist and/or poison center for assistance in managing patients with an overdose.
    5) TRANSFER CRITERIA: Patients with large overdoses or severe neutropenia may benefit from early transfer to a cancer treatment or bone marrow transplant center.
    L) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Sorafenib is 99.5% bound to plasma proteins. Pyridine N-oxide is the primary metabolite found in the plasma and has in vitro potency similar to that of sorafenib. Following a 100 mg oral dose of sorafenib, 77% was excreted in the feces within 14 days and 19% was excreted in the urine as glucuronidated metabolites within 14 days. The mean terminal half-life of sorafenib ranges from 24 to 38 hours following single oral doses of 100, 200 and 400 mg.
    M) PITFALLS
    1) Symptoms may be delayed (particularly myelosuppression), so ongoing monitoring may be indicated. A patient receiving sorafenib may have significant co-morbidities that can also produce significant toxicity. Failure to recognize that an inadvertent exposure has occurred.
    N) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Other agents that may produce myelosuppression.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has not been established. Sorafenib doses of 800 mg given twice daily primarily resulted in diarrhea and dermatologic symptoms along with grade 3 hypertension and dyspnea.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: 400 mg orally twice daily. PEDIATRIC: The safety and efficacy of sorafenib in pediatric patients have not been established.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Sorafenib is used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, differentiated thyroid carcinoma refractory to radioactive iodine treatment.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Sorafenib is a kinase inhibitor that decreases tumor cell proliferation in vitro.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure may occur.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Common adverse effects with sorafenib therapy include fatigue, hypertension, rash/desquamation, hand-foot skin reaction, hypophosphatemia, alopecia, gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), bleeding at all sites and sensory neuropathy.
    2) Other adverse effects that may occur with sorafenib therapy include weight loss, dry skin, constipation, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, joint pain and headache.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) OVERDOSE: Sorafenib overdose information is limited. Doses of 800 mg twice daily, given during clinical trials, have resulted in diarrhea and grade 3 hypertension, dyspnea and rash/desquamation.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Hypertension is a common occurrence with sorafenib therapy.
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Doses of 800 mg twice daily resulted in the development of grade 3 hypertension in one patient.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Hypertension has been frequently reported with sorafenib therapy (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013; Ratain et al, 2005).
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Grade 3 hypertension was reported in one patient who received sorafenib, during a phase I clinical trial, at a dosage regimen of 800 mg twice daily (Clark et al, 2005).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hypertension occurred in 17% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 2% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 hypertension was reported in 3% of patients treated with sorafenib and in less than 1% of patients treated with placebo. One of these patients discontinued sorafenib because of hypertension. Hypertension was typically mild to moderate, occurred early in treatment, and was treated with standard antihypertensive agents (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Grade 3 or 4 hypertension was observed in 24% of patients (n=202) in a phase II trial (Ratain et al, 2005).
    c) Hypertension, observed in a phase II trial, responded to diuretics and/or beta-blockers (Ahmad & Eisen, 2004). In the preliminary results of another phase II trial, hypertension was reported to be manageable and reversible, and became less frequent with increased duration of administration (Eisen, 2005).
    d) Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) and 12 of 20 (60%) patients experienced 10 mmHg or greater and 20 mmHg or greater in their systolic blood pressure, respectively, as compared to their baseline values, after receiving sorafenib 400 mg twice daily for 3 weeks. In 12 of 17 assessable patients (71%), the systolic blood pressure remained elevated by at least 10 mmHg at week 18 (Veronese et al, 2006).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Grade 3 hypertension was reported in one patient who received sorafenib, during a phase I clinical trial, at a dosage regimen of 800 mg twice daily (Clark et al, 2005).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dyspnea occurred in 14% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 12% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea was reported in 3% of patients treated with sorafenib and 2% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Grade 3 dyspnea was reported in 1 patient who received sorafenib during a phase I clinical trial at a dosage regimen of 800 mg twice daily (Clark et al, 2005).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FATIGUE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Fatigue occurred in 37% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 28% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 fatigue was reported in 5% of patients treated with sorafenib and 3% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Grade 3 or 4 fatigue was observed in 9.5% of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a phase II study (n=137) (Anon, 2005).
    c) Fatigue was observed in 56% of patients (n=202) with advanced renal cell carcinoma in a phase II trial. Grade 3 or 4 fatigue was observed in 5% of the patients (Ratain et al, 2005).
    d) Fatigue, reported in the preliminary results of a phase II trial, was manageable and reversible, and became less frequent with subsequent dosing (Eisen, 2005).
    B) SENSORY NEUROPATHY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sensory neuropathy occurred in 13% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 6% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) HEADACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Headache occurred in 10% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 6% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea occurred in 23% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 19% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Vomiting occurred in 16% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 12% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Abdominal pain occurred in 11% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 9% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 abdominal pain was reported in 2% of patients in each group (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Diarrhea occurred in 43% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 13% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 diarrhea was reported in 2% of patients treated with sorafenib and less than 1% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was observed in 8% of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a phase II study (n=137) (Anon, 2005).
    c) Diarrhea, reported in the preliminary results of a phase II trial, was manageable and reversible, and became less frequent with increased duration of administration (Eisen, 2005).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Primarily diarrhea and dermatologic effects were reported in patients who received sorafenib therapy, 800 mg twice daily, during clinical trials (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    D) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation occurred in 15% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 11% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    E) PANCREATITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Clinical pancreatitis occurred in 3 patients (n=451; one Grade 2 and two Grade 4) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 1 patient (n=451; Grade 2) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) In a phase I trial, 3 of 69 patients experienced grade 3 pancreatitis, which did not appear to be dose-dependent. All 3 patients recovered within 10 to 14 days of sorafenib withdrawal (Strumberg et al, 2005).
    c) Elevated amylase occurred in 30% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 23% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 amylase elevations were reported in 1% of patients treated with sorafenib and 3% of patients treated with placebo. Amylase elevations were typically transient (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    d) Elevated lipase occurred in 41% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 30% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 lipase elevations were reported in 12% of patients treated with sorafenib and 7% of patients treated with placebo. Lipase elevations were typically transient (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    F) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Anorexia occurred in 16% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 13% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Anorexia, reported in the preliminary results of a phase II trial, was manageable and reversible, and became less frequent with increased duration of administration (Eisen, 2005).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a phase I trial, hepatic-related adverse events (the most frequent were abnormal AST, ALT, alkaline phosphate (ALP), and bilirubin levels) occurred in 61% of patients (n=44) treated with doses of oral sorafenib ranging from 50- to 800 mg twice daily over multiple cycles (21 days on/7days off) (Awada et al, 2005).
    B) TOXIC LIVER DISEASE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORTS: Six consecutive HIV infected patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with sorafenib. The patients were also receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) that included emtricitabine, tenofovir, fosamprenavir, ritonavir and atazanavir prescribed in various combinations. Each patient except one was started on a reduced dosage of 400 mg daily and 4 patients developed hepatotoxicity. Another patient developed hepatotoxicity, arterial hypertension and diarrhea while receiving 800 mg of sorafenib daily and died after 28 days from neoplastic disease progression. Median survival in this series of patients was 108 days. Due to the high incidence of sorafenib hepatotoxicity in HIV patients, the authors suggested a sorafenib-HAART interaction (Mancuso et al, 2015).
    C) HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a phase I trial, 3 of 69 patients experienced transient grade 3 elevation of conjugated bilirubin without concomitant elevation of other hepatic enzymes. Elevation of conjugated bilirubin, which did not appear to be dose-dependent, occurred on day 3 of treatment and resolved spontaneously by day 5 (Strumberg et al, 2005).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BLEEDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hemorrhage, including all sites, occurred in 15% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 8% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage was reported in 2% of patients treated with sorafenib and 1% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Subungual splinter hemorrhages have been reported with sorafenib therapy. The hemorrhages appear as straight black or red lines resembling wood splinters under the nails. The hemorrhages seem to be confined within the epidermis of the nail bed and are carried forward with nail growth. The subungual hemorrhages commonly occur with fingernails but are observed less frequently with toenails (Robert et al, 2005).
    B) LYMPHOCYTOPENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Lymphopenia occurred in 23% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 13% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia was reported in 13% of patients treated with sorafenib and 7% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) NEUTROPENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Neutropenia occurred in 18% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 10% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 5% of patients treated with sorafenib and 2% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    D) ANEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Anemia occurred in 44% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 49% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 anemia was reported in 2% of patients treated with sorafenib and 4% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    E) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Thrombocytopenia occurred in 12% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 5% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 1% of patients treated with sorafenib and 0% of patients treated with a placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACRAL ERYTHEMA DUE TO CYTOTOXIC THERAPY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hand-foot skin reaction (acral erythema) is typically Grade 1 or 2 and usually appears during the first 6 weeks of treatment. It generally manifests as painful, symmetrical erythematous and edematous areas on the palms of the hands and soles of the feet. It is commonly preceded or accompanied by paresthesias and may be exacerbated by a warm environment. Hyperkeratosis and desquamation may also commonly occur with the hand-foot skin reaction. Management may include topical treatment for symptomatic relief and temporary interruption and/or dose modification of sorafenib. In severe or persistent cases, permanent discontinuation of sorafenib may be necessary (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013; Robert et al, 2005).
    b) Hand-foot skin reaction occurred in 30% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 7% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction was reported in 6% of patients treated with sorafenib and 0% of patients treated with placebo. Three of 451 patients treated with sorafenib required permanent discontinuation of therapy because of acral erythema (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    c) Grade 3 or 4 hand-foot skin reaction was observed in 5% of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in an unpublished phase II study (n=137) (Anon, 2005). In a phase II trial in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (n=202), hand-foot skin reaction was observed in 61% of patients, while Grade 3 or 4 hand-foot skin reaction was observed in 13% of patients (Ratain et al, 2005).
    d) Hand-foot skin reaction particularly affected pressure points, and it was responsive to pyridoxine and topical emollients in a phase II trial (Ahmad & Eisen, 2004).
    B) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Pruritus occurred in 19% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 6% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Pruritus was reported in 4 of 19 patients who received sorafenib therapy during a phase I clinical trial. The pruritus appeared to be dose-dependent, increasing in severity and frequency at the 400 mg twice daily dose level and higher (Clark et al, 2005).
    C) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Rash and/or desquamation occurred in 40% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 16% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 rash and/or desquamation was reported in less than 1% of patients in each group. Rash is typically Grade 1 or 2 , usually appears during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and commonly occurs on the face or scalp. Facial erythema may be exacerbated by hot temperatures. Management may include topical treatment for symptomatic relief and temporary interruption and/or dose modification of sorafenib. In severe or persistent cases, permanent discontinuation of sorafenib may be necessary (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013; Robert et al, 2005).
    b) Rash was observed in 62% of patients (n=202) with advanced renal cell carcinoma in a phase II trial (Ratain et al, 2005). Hair loss was observed when rash involved the scalp in a phase II trial (Ahmad & Eisen, 2004).
    c) Grade 1 or 2 rash/desquamation was reported in 21% of patients (n=19), who received sorafenib during a phase I clinical trial. The rash/desquamation appeared to be dose-dependent with the severity and frequency increasing at the 400 mg twice daily dose level and higher (Clark et al, 2005).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Grade 3 rash/desquamation was reported in 2 patients who received sorafenib, during a phase I clinical trial at the dosage regimen of 800 mg twice daily (Clark et al, 2005).
    D) ALOPECIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Alopecia occurred in 27% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 3% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) Hair loss has been observed, particularly when rash has involved the scalp (Ahmad & Eisen, 2004).
    E) EXCESSIVE HAIR GROWTH
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a phase II trial, significant hair growth was observed, particularly when treatment duration was greater than 6 months (Ahmad & Eisen, 2004).
    F) DRY SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dry skin occurred in 11% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 4% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) JOINT PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Joint pain occurred in 10% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 6% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial. Grade 3 joint pain was reported in 2% of patients treated with sorafenib and less than 1% of patients treated with placebo (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) WEIGHT LOSS FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Weight loss occurred in 10% of patients (n=451) treated with sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to 6% of patients (n=451) who received placebo therapy in a phase III trial (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Sorafenib is classified as an FDA pregnancy category D. Based on the teratogenic and embryo-fetal toxicity observed in animals that received doses significantly below those recommended for humans, sorafenib may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Sorafenib was shown to be excreted in the milk of lactating rats. Although fertility studies have not been conducted in animals, degeneration of the epididymis, testicles, prostate, and seminal vesicles, central necrosis of the corpora lutea, arrested follicular development, tubular degeneration of the testes, and oligospermia were observed in animals in repeat-dose toxicity studies.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no human data were available to assess the teratogenic potential of sorafenib (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS, RABBITS: Studies conducted in rats and rabbits resulted in teratogenic toxicity at doses that were considerably below the recommended human dose of 400 mg twice daily (approximately 500 mg/m(2)/day on a body surface area basis). Doses of 1.2 mg/m(2)/day (0.2 mg/kg/day) or greater in rats and 3.6 mg/m(2)/day (0.3 mg/kg/day) in rabbits (approximately 0.008 times the AUC observed in humans at the recommended dose) during the period of organogenesis produced adverse intrauterine developmental effects that included skeletal retardations. Because lower doses were not studied, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was not determined in rats or rabbits for this study (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to sorafenib during pregnancy in humans (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    B) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified sorafenib as FDA pregnancy category D (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS, RABBITS: Studies conducted in rats and rabbits resulted in embryo-fetal toxicity at doses that were considerably below the recommended human dose of 400 mg twice daily (approximately 500 mg/m(2)/day on a body surface area basis). Doses of 1.2 mg/m(2)/day (0.2 mg/kg/day) or greater in rats and 3.6 mg/m(2)/day (0.3 mg/kg/day) in rabbits (approximately 0.008 times the AUC observed in humans at the recommended dose) during the period of organogenesis produced adverse intrauterine developmental effects that included increased post-implantation loss, resorptions, retarded fetal weight. Because lower doses were not studied, a no observed adverse effect level was not determined in rats or rabbits for this study (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to sorafenib during lactation in humans (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Following administration of radiolabeled sorafenib to lactating Wistar rats, 27% of the radioactivity was secreted into the milk with the milk to plasma AUC ratio of approximately 5 to 1 (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011)
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Specific studies evaluating fertility effects in animals have not been conducted; however, multiple adverse effects have been observed following repeat-dose toxicity studies, with rats being more susceptible than mice or dogs. The adverse effects observed in rats included testicular atrophy or degeneration, degeneration of the epididymis, prostate, and seminal vesicles, central necrosis of the corpora lutea, and arrested follicular development. The adverse effects occurred at daily oral doses of at least 30 mg/m(2) (approximately 0.5 times the AUC observed in humans at the recommended dose). In dogs, sorafenib administration at doses of 600 mg/m(2)/day (approximately 0.3 times the AUC observed in humans at the recommended dose) and 1200 mg/m(2)/day resulted in tubular degeneration of the testes and oligospermia, respectively (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2011).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, carcinogenicity studies with sorafenib have not been conducted (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Genotoxicity

    A) Sorafenib was clastogenic in the in-vitro Chinese Hamster Ovary cell assay with metabolic activation; however, it was not mutagenic in the in-vitro Ames bacterial cell assay nor clastogenic in the in-vivo mouse micronucleus assay (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Serum sorafenib levels are not clinically useful in guiding management following overdose, or widely available in clinical practice.
    B) Hematologic effects, such as hemorrhage (including the gastrointestinal and/or respiratory tract), thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia are relatively common with sorafenib therapy. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    C) Monitor vital signs.
    D) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    E) Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of mucositis.
    F) Monitor serum amylase and lipase in patients with abdominal pain or as indicated.
    G) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    H) Monitor renal function and liver enzymes following a significant exposure or as indicated.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with an intentional or significant overdose should be closely monitored in an inpatient setting, with frequent monitoring of vital signs (every 4 hours for the first 24 hours), and daily monitoring of CBC with differential until bone marrow suppression is resolved.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) An asymptomatic adult that has inadvertently taken an extra dose can be monitored at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult an oncologist, medical toxicologist and/or poison center for assistance in managing patients with an overdose.
    6.3.1.4) PATIENT TRANSFER/ORAL
    A) Patients with large overdoses or severe neutropenia may benefit from early transfer to a cancer treatment or bone marrow transplant center.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with an inadvertent, moderate exposure, symptomatic patients or children should be observed and treated until symptoms resolve. Outpatient laboratory monitoring should be arranged until bone marrow recovery, if the patient is not admitted.

Monitoring

    A) Serum sorafenib levels are not clinically useful in guiding management following overdose, or widely available in clinical practice.
    B) Hematologic effects, such as hemorrhage (including the gastrointestinal and/or respiratory tract), thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia are relatively common with sorafenib therapy. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    C) Monitor vital signs.
    D) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    E) Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of mucositis.
    F) Monitor serum amylase and lipase in patients with abdominal pain or as indicated.
    G) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    H) Monitor renal function and liver enzymes following a significant exposure or as indicated.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat persistent nausea and vomiting with antiemetics as needed. Correct any significant fluid and/or electrolyte abnormalities in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea. Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic treatment is generally not necessary. Sedation with benzodiazepines in agitated patients with hypertension and tachycardia. Consider administering colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) as these patients may be a risk to develop significant neutropenia. RASH: Use topical emollient of 2% ketoconazole or topical steroids in patients with facial erythematous rash. Onset is usually 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy and it typically fades or disappears with continued therapy.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Monitor vital signs regularly. For severe hypertension, nitroprusside is preferred. Labetalol, nitroglycerin and phentolamine are alternatives. Administer colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) in patients that appear to be at risk for severe neutropenia. An increased risk of bleeding has been associated with sorafenib therapy; bleeding from any site has been fatal in some cases. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Serum sorafenib levels are not clinically useful in guiding management following overdose, or widely available in clinical practice.
    2) Hematologic effects, such as hemorrhage (including the gastrointestinal and/or respiratory tract), thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia are relatively common with sorafenib therapy. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    3) Monitor vital signs.
    4) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    5) Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of mucositis.
    6) Monitor serum amylase and lipase in patients with abdominal pain or as indicated.
    7) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    8) Monitor renal function and liver enzymes following a significant exposure or as indicated.
    C) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate hypertension without evidence of end organ damage, pharmacologic intervention is generally not necessary. Sedative agents such as benzodiazepines may be helpful in treating hypertension and tachycardia in agitated patients, especially if a sympathomimetic agent is involved in the poisoning.
    2) For hypertensive emergencies (severe hypertension with evidence of end organ injury (CNS, cardiac, renal), or emergent need to lower mean arterial pressure 20% to 25% within one hour), sodium nitroprusside is preferred. Nitroglycerin and phentolamine are possible alternatives.
    3) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/INDICATIONS
    a) Useful for emergent treatment of severe hypertension secondary to poisonings. Sodium nitroprusside has a rapid onset of action, a short duration of action and a half-life of about 2 minutes (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007) that can allow accurate titration of blood pressure, as the hypertensive effects of drug overdoses are often short lived.
    4) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/DOSE
    a) ADULT: Begin intravenous infusion at 0.1 microgram/kilogram/minute and titrate to desired effect; up to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute may be required (American Heart Association, 2005). Frequent hemodynamic monitoring and administration by an infusion pump that ensures a precise flow rate is mandatory (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). PEDIATRIC: Initial: 0.5 to 1 microgram/kilogram/minute; titrate to effect up to 8 micrograms/kilogram/minute (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    5) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/SOLUTION PREPARATION
    a) The reconstituted 50 mg solution must be further diluted in 250 to 1000 mL D5W to desired concentration (recommended 50 to 200 mcg/mL) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection, 2004). Prepare fresh every 24 hours; wrap in aluminum foil. Discard discolored solution (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    6) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) Severe hypotension; headaches, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps; thiocyanate or cyanide toxicity (generally from prolonged, high dose infusion); methemoglobinemia; lactic acidosis; chest pain or dysrhythmias (high doses) (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007). The addition of 1 gram of sodium thiosulfate to each 100 milligrams of sodium nitroprusside for infusion may help to prevent cyanide toxicity in patients receiving prolonged or high dose infusions (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    7) SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Monitor blood pressure every 30 to 60 seconds at onset of infusion; once stabilized, monitor every 5 minutes. Continuous blood pressure monitoring with an intra-arterial catheter is advised (Prod Info NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, 2007).
    8) NITROGLYCERIN/INDICATIONS
    a) May be used to control hypertension, and is particularly useful in patients with acute coronary syndromes or acute pulmonary edema (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    9) NITROGLYCERIN/ADULT DOSE
    a) Begin infusion at 10 to 20 mcg/min and increase by 5 or 10 mcg/min every 5 to 10 minutes until the desired hemodynamic response is achieved (American Heart Association, 2005). Maximum rate 200 mcg/min (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    10) NITROGLYCERIN/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) Usual Dose: 29 days or Older: 1 to 5 mcg/kg/min continuous IV infusion. Maximum 60 mcg/kg/min (Laitinen et al, 1997; Nam et al, 1989; Rasch & Lancaster, 1987; Ilbawi et al, 1985; Friedman & George, 1985).
    11) PHENTOLAMINE/INDICATIONS
    a) Useful for severe hypertension, particularly if caused by agents with alpha adrenergic agonist effects usually induced by catecholamine excess (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    12) PHENTOLAMINE/ADULT DOSE
    a) BOLUS DOSE: 5 to 15 mg IV bolus repeated as needed (U.S. Departement of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 2004). Onset of action is 1 to 2 minutes with a duration of 10 to 30 minutes (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    b) CONTINUOUS INFUSION: 1 mg/hr, adjusted hourly to stabilize blood pressure. Prepared by adding 60 mg of phentolamine mesylate to 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection; continuous infusion ranging from 12 to 52 mg/hr over 4 days has been used in case reports (McMillian et al, 2011).
    13) PHENTOLAMINE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg/dose (maximum of 5 mg per dose) intravenously every 5 minutes until hypertension is controlled, then every 2 to 4 hours as needed (Singh et al, 2012; Koch-Weser, 1974).
    14) PHENTOLAMINE/ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Adverse events can include orthostatic or prolonged hypotension, tachycardia, dysrhythmias, angina, flushing, headache, nasal congestion, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009; Prod Info Phentolamine Mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard, 2005).
    15) CAUTION
    a) Phentolamine should be used with caution in patients with coronary artery disease because it may induce angina or myocardial infarction (Rhoney & Peacock, 2009).
    D) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Myelosuppression may occur following overdose.
    2) Monitor CBC with differential daily. If fever or infection develops during leukopenic phase, cultures should be obtained and appropriate antibiotics started. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage.
    3) Colony stimulating factors have been shown to shorten the duration of severe neutropenia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy (Stull et al, 2005; Hartman et al, 1997). They should be administered to any patient who receives a sorafenib overdose.
    4) Patients with severe neutropenia should be in protective isolation. Monitor CBC with differential daily. If fever or infection develops during leukopenic phase, cultures should be obtained and appropriate antibiotics started. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage.
    E) NEUTROPENIA
    1) COLONY STIMULATING FACTORS
    a) DOSING
    1) FILGRASTIM: The recommended starting dose for adults is 5 mcg/kg/day administered as a single daily subQ injection, by short IV infusion (15 to 30 minutes), or continuous IV infusion (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) subcutaneous injection, intravenous injection, 2015). According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), treatment should be continued until the ANC is at least 2 to 3 x 10(9)/L (Smith et al, 2006).
    2) SARGRAMOSTIM: The recommended dose is 250 mcg/m(2) day administered intravenously over a 4-hour period OR 250 mcg/m(2)/day SubQ once daily (Prod Info LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous injection liquid, intravenous injection liquid, subcutaneous injection lyophilized powder for solution, intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2013). Treatment should be continued until the ANC is at least 2 to 3 x 10(9)/L (Prod Info LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous injection liquid, intravenous injection liquid, subcutaneous injection lyophilized powder for solution, intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2013; Smith et al, 2006).
    2) HIGH-DOSE THERAPY
    a) Higher doses of filgrastim, such as those used for bone marrow transplant, may be indicated after overdose.
    b) FILGRASTIM: In patients receiving bone marrow transplant (BMT), the recommended dose of filgrastim is 10 mcg/kg/day given as an IV infusion no longer than 24 hours. The daily dose of filgrastim should be titrated based on neutrophil response (ie, absolute neutrophil count (ANC)) as follows (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) subcutaneous injection, intravenous injection, 2015):
    1) When ANC is greater than 1000/mm(3) for 3 consecutive days; reduce filgrastim to 5 mcg/kg/day.
    2) If ANC remains greater than 1000/mm(3) for 3 more consecutive days; discontinue filgrastim.
    3) If ANC decreases again to less than 1000/mm(3); resume filgrastim at 5 mcg/kg/day.
    c) In BMT studies, patients received up to 138 mcg/kg/day without toxic effects. However, a flattening of the dose response curve occurred at daily doses of greater than 10 mcg/kg/day (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) subcutaneous injection, intravenous injection, 2015).
    d) SARGRAMOSTIM: This agent has been indicated for the acceleration of myeloid recovery in patients after autologous or allogenic BMT. Usual dosing is 250 mcg/m(2)/day as a 2-hour IV infusion over a 2-hour period. Duration is based on neutrophil recovery (Prod Info LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous injection liquid, intravenous injection liquid, subcutaneous injection lyophilized powder for solution, intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2013).
    3) SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
    a) In pediatric patients, the use of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) can reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia. However, this therapy should be limited to patients at high risk due to the potential of developing a secondary myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome associated with the use of CSFs. Careful consideration is suggested in using CSFs in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) (Smith et al, 2006).
    4) ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS
    a) Treat high risk patients with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, if the patient is expected to have prolonged (more than 7 days), profound neutropenia (ANC 100 cells/mm(3) or less). This has been shown to decrease the relative risk of all cause mortality by 48% and or infection-related mortality by 62% in these patients (most patients in these studies had hematologic malignancies or received hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Low risk patients usually do not routinely require antibacterial prophylaxis (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    F) FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Due to the risk of potentially severe neutropenia following overdose with sorafenib, all patients should be monitored for the development of febrile neutropenia.
    2) CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    a) SUMMARY: The following are guidelines presented by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) to manage patients with cancer that may develop chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    b) DEFINITION: Patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated immediately with empiric antibiotic therapy; antibiotic therapy should broadly treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    c) CRITERIA: Fever (greater than or equal to 38.3 degrees C) AND neutropenia (an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than or equal to 500 cells/mm(3)). Profound neutropenia has been described as an ANC of less than or equal to 100 cells/mm(3) (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    d) ASSESSMENT: HIGH RISK PATIENT: Anticipated neutropenia of greater than 7 days, clinically unstable and significant comorbidities (ie, new onset of hypotension, pneumonia, abdominal pain, neurologic changes). LOW RISK PATIENT: Neutropenia anticipated to last less than 7 days, clinically stable with no comorbidities (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    e) LABORATORY ANALYSIS: CBC with differential leukocyte count and platelet count, hepatic and renal function, electrolytes, 2 sets of blood cultures with a least a set from a central and/or peripheral indwelling catheter site, if present. Urinalysis and urine culture (if urinalysis positive, urinary symptoms or indwelling urinary catheter). Chest x-ray, if patient has respiratory symptoms (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    f) EMPIRIC ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY: HIGH RISK patients should be admitted to the hospital for IV therapy. Any of the following can be used for empiric antibiotic monotherapy: piperacillin-tazobactam; a carbapenem (meropenem or imipenem-cilastatin); an antipseudomonal beta-lactam agent (eg, ceftazidime or cefepime). LOW RISK patients should be placed on an oral empiric antibiotic therapy (ie, ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate), if able to tolerate oral therapy and observed for 4 to 24 hours. IV therapy may be indicated, if patient poorly tolerating an oral regimen (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    1) ADJUST THERAPY: Adjust therapy based on culture results, clinical assessment (ie, hemodynamic instability or sepsis), catheter-related infections (ie, cellulitis, chills, rigors) and radiographic findings. Suggested therapies may include: vancomycin or linezolid for cellulitis or pneumonia; the addition of an aminoglycoside and switch to carbapenem for pneumonia or gram negative bacteremia; or metronidazole for abdominal symptoms or suspected C. difficile infection (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    2) DURATION OF THERAPY: Dependent on the particular organism(s), resolution of neutropenia (until ANC is equal or greater than 500 cells/mm(3)), and clinical evaluation. Ongoing symptoms may require further cultures and diagnostic evaluation, and review of antibiotic therapies. Consider the use of empiric antifungal therapy, broader antimicrobial coverage, if patient hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable and responding to therapy, it may be appropriate to switch to outpatient therapy (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    g) COMMON PATHOGENS frequently observed in neutropenic patients (Freifeld et al, 2011):
    1) GRAM-POSITIVE PATHOGENS: Coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus (including MRSA strains), Enterococcus species (including vancomycin-resistant strains), Viridans group streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyrogenes.
    2) GRAM NEGATIVE PATHOGENS: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Citrobacter species, Acinetobacter species, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
    h) HEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH FACTORS (G-CSF or GM-CSF): Prophylactic use of these agents should be considered in patients with an anticipated risk of fever and neutropenia of 20% or greater. In general, colony stimulating factors are not recommended for the treatment of established fever and neutropenia (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    G) STOMATITIS
    1) Treat mild mucositis with bland oral rinses with 0.9% saline, sodium bicarbonate, and water. For moderate cases with pain, consider adding a topical anesthetic (eg, lidocaine, benzocaine, dyclonine, diphenhydramine, or doxepin). Treat moderate to severe mucositis with topical anesthetics and systemic analgesics (eg, morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl). Patients with mucositis and moderate xerostomia may receive sialagogues (eg, sugarless candy/mints, pilocarpine/cevimeline, or bethanechol) and topical fluorides to stimulate salivary gland function. Patients who are receiving myelosuppressive therapy may receive prophylactic antiviral and antifungal agents to prevent infections. Topical oral antimicrobial mouthwashes, rinses, pastilles, or lozenges may be used to decrease the risk of infection (Bensinger et al, 2008).
    2) Total parenteral nutrition may provide nutritional requirements during the healing phase of drug-induced oral ulceration, mucositis, and esophagitis.
    H) ERUPTION
    1) A facial erythematous rash may commonly occur with sorafenib therapy. Onset is generally 1 to 2 weeks after beginning therapy, can be exacerbated with hot temperatures, and will typically fade or disappear with continued therapy. For those patients requesting treatment, topical emollient of 2% ketoconazole or topical steroids may be used (Robert et al, 2005).
    2) Treatment with colloidal oatmeal helped to control rash in 10 patients with acneiform eruptions induced from tyrosine-kinase inhibitor administration, including sorafenib (Alexandrescu et al, 2007).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There is no information regarding the effectiveness of hemodialysis or hemoperfusion for the removal of sorafenib from plasma; however, due to its high protein binding (99.5%), it is anticipated that hemodialysis would be ineffective (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013)

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has not been established. Sorafenib doses of 800 mg given twice daily primarily resulted in diarrhea and dermatologic symptoms along with grade 3 hypertension and dyspnea.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: 400 mg orally twice daily. PEDIATRIC: The safety and efficacy of sorafenib in pediatric patients have not been established.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) The recommended dosage of sorafenib tosylate for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, or differentiated thyroid carcinoma is 400 mg orally twice daily, at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating. Treatment should be continued until the patient no longer benefits or until unacceptable toxicity occurs (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) If dose reduction is necessary in the treatment of hepatocellular or renal cell carcinoma, the dose of sorafenib may be reduced to 400 mg orally once daily. If additional dose reduction is required, sorafenib may be reduced to 400 mg orally once every other day. For differentiated thyroid carcinoma, the dose of sorafenib may be reduced to 600 mg orally daily (400 mg and 200 mg twelve hours apart). If additional dose reduction is required, sorafenib may be reduced to 400 mg orally daily (200 mg twice daily) and subsequently, to 200 mg once daily (if needed) (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) The safety and efficacy of sorafenib administration in the pediatric population have not been established (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) A toxic dose has not been established.
    B) During clinical trials, sorafenib doses of 800 mg given twice daily primarily resulted in diarrhea and dermatologic symptoms along with grade 3 hypertension and dyspnea (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013; Clark et al, 2005).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Sorafenib is a multi-kinase enzyme inhibitor, decreasing tumor cell proliferation in vitro (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) Sorafenib blocks the enzyme Raf kinase; Raf kinases are serine/threonine protein kinases that are downstream effector molecules of Ras proteins (Wilhelm et al, 2004). Raf kinases activate the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway, which mediates cell proliferation, differentiation, and transformation (Awada et al, 2005; Strumberg et al, 2005). Specifically, sorafenib has been shown to inhibit Raf-1 (also termed c-Raf), and wild-type and mutant (V599E) B-Raf activity (Strumberg et al, 2005; Wilhelm et al, 2004).
    C) Sorafenib also inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Through inhibition of phosphorylation, it blocks the activation of several receptor tyrosine kinases involved in neovascularization and tumor progression, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, VEGFR-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFR-B), Flt3, c-KIT, and p38-alpha (Strumberg et al, 2005; Ahmad & Eisen, 2004). In addition, sorafenib inhibits the activity of Raf-1 and B-Raf, which are involved in the regulation of endothelial apoptosis, and therefore angiogenesis (Wilhelm et al, 2004; Awada et al, 2005).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Sorafenib tosylate is a white to yellowish or brownish solid. It is soluble in PEG 400, slightly soluble in ethanol, and practically insoluble in aqueous media (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Molecular Weight

    A) 637 g/mole (sorafenib tosylate) (Prod Info NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, 2013).

General Bibliography

    1) Ahmad T & Eisen T: Kinase inhibition with BAY 43-9006 in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10(suppl):6388s-6392s.
    2) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    3) Alexandrescu DT, Vaillant JG, & Dasanu CA: Effect of treatment with a colloidal oatmeal lotion on the acneform eruption induced by epidermal growth factor receptor and multiple tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32(1):71-74.
    4) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    5) Anon: Bayer/Onyx initiate phase III trial of BAY 43-9006 in advanced primary HCC. Espicom Business Intelligence, March 16, 2005.
    6) Awada A, Hendlisz A, Gil T, et al: Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY 43-9006 administered for 21 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. Br J Cancer 2005; 92(10):1855-1861.
    7) Bensinger W, Schubert M, Ang KK, et al: NCCN Task Force Report. prevention and management of mucositis in cancer care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008; 6 Suppl 1:S1-21.
    8) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    9) Clark JW, Eder JP, Ryan D, et al: Safety and pharmacokinetics of the dual action Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, BAY 43-9006, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11(15):5472-5480.
    10) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    11) Eisen T: Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006): preliminary antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a phase II randomized discontinuation trial (0.301). Ann Oncol 2005; 16(suppl 3):17.
    12) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    13) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    14) Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al: Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(4):e56-e93.
    15) Friedman WF & George BL : Treatment of congestive heart failure by altering loading conditions of the heart. J Pediatr 1985; 106(5):697-706.
    16) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    17) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    18) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    19) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    20) Hartman LC, Tschetter LK, Habermann TM, et al: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe chemotherapy-induced afebrile neutropenia.. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1776-1780.
    21) Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, DeLeon SY, et al: Hemodynamic effects of intravenous nitroglycerin in pediatric patients after heart surgery. Circulation 1985; 72(3 Pt 2):II101-II107.
    22) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    23) Koch-Weser J: Hypertensive emergencies. N Engl J Med 1974; 290:211.
    24) Laitinen P, Happonen JM, Sairanen H, et al: Amrinone versus dopamine-nitroglycerin after reconstructive surgery for complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11(7):870-874.
    25) Mancuso A, Mazzola A, Cabibbo G, et al: Survival of patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47(4):324-330.
    26) McMillian WD, Trombley BJ, Charash WE, et al: Phentolamine continuous infusion in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011; 68(2):130-134.
    27) Nam YT, Shin T, & Yoshitake J: Induced hypotension for surgical repair of congenital dislocation of the hip in children. J Anesth 1989; 3(1):58-64.
    28) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    29) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    30) Product Information: LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous injection liquid, intravenous injection liquid, subcutaneous injection lyophilized powder for solution, intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, sargramostim subcutaneous injection liquid, intravenous injection liquid, subcutaneous injection lyophilized powder for solution, intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution. sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC (per manufacturer), Bridgewater, NJ, 2013.
    31) Product Information: NEUPOGEN(R) subcutaneous injection, intravenous injection, filgrastim subcutaneous injection, intravenous injection. Amgen Inc. (per FDA), Thousand Oaks, CA, 2015.
    32) Product Information: NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, sorafenib oral tablets. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc (per manufacturer), Wayne, NJ, 2011.
    33) Product Information: NEXAVAR(R) oral tablets, sorafenib oral tablets. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (per FDA), Whippany, NJ, 2013.
    34) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection for IV infusion, Sodium Nitroprusside injection for IV infusion. Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL, 2007.
    35) Product Information: NITROPRESS(R) injection, sodium nitroprusside injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    36) Product Information: Phentolamine Mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard, phentolamine mesylate IM, IV injection Sandoz Standard. Sandoz Canada (per manufacturer), Boucherville, QC, 2005.
    37) Rasch DK & Lancaster L: Successful use of nitroglycerin to treat postoperative pulmonary hypertension. Crit Care Med 1987; 15(6):616-617.
    38) Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM, et al: Final findings from a phase II, placebo-controlled, randomized discontinuation trial (RDT) of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (4544). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(16 suppl):388s.
    39) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    40) Rhoney D & Peacock WF: Intravenous therapy for hypertensive emergencies, part 1. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66(15):1343-1352.
    41) Robert C, Soria JC, Spatz A, et al: Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6(7):491-500.
    42) Singh D, Akingbola O, Yosypiv I, et al: Emergency management of hypertension in children. Int J Nephrol 2012; 2012:420247.
    43) Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al: 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(19):3187-3205.
    44) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    45) Strumberg D, Richly H, Hilger RA, et al: Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the novel Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor BAY 43-9006 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(5):965-972.
    46) Stull DM, Bilmes R, Kim H, et al: Comparison of sargramostim and filgrastim in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62(1):83-87.
    47) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    48) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. As accessed 2012-06-20.
    49) Veronese ML, Mosenkis A, Flaherty KT, et al: Mechanisms of hypertension associated with BAY 43-9006. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(9):1363-1369.
    50) Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L, et al: BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2004; 64(19):7099-7109.