6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002). 1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
2) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
2) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
6.5.3) TREATMENT
A) SUPPORT 1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Correct any significant electrolyte abnormalities in patients with severe diarrhea. Neutropenia may occur. Monitor serial CBC with differential. For severe neutropenia, administer colony stimulating factor (eg; filgrastim, sargramostim).
B) MONITORING OF PATIENT 1) Plasma concentrations are not readily available or clinically useful in the management of overdose.
2) Monitor vital signs after significant overdose.
3) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant diarrhea.
4) Monitor CBC with differential following significant overdose.
5) Monitor liver enzymes for possible elevations in bilirubin following significant overdose.
6) Monitor creatine kinase levels following significant overdose.
C) NEUTROPENIA 1) There is little data on the use of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors to treat neutropenia after drug overdose or idiosyncratic reactions. These agents have been shown to shorten the duration of severe neutropenia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy (Hartman et al, 1997; Stull et al, 2005). They have also been used to treat agranulocytosis induced by nonchemotherapy drugs (Beauchesne & Shalansky, 1999). They may be considered in patients with severe neutropenia who have or are at significant risk for developing febrile neutropenia. a) Filgrastim: The usual starting dose in adults is 5 micrograms/kilogram/day by intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) injection, 2006).
b) Sargramostim: Usual dose is 250 micrograms/square meter/day infused IV over 4 hours (Prod Info LEUKINE(R) injection, 2006).
c) Monitor CBC with differential.
D) RHABDOMYOLYSIS 1) During clinical trials, creatine kinase elevations of more than 10 times ULN occurred in 1% of patients treated for 12 weeks with sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin and peginterferon alpha; less than 1% of patients treated for 24 weeks with peginterferon alpha/ribavirin; and in 2% of patients who received sofosbuvir/ribavirin for 12 weeks (Prod Info SOVALDI(TM) oral tablets, 2013).
2) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
3) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
4) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
5) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
6) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).
|