MOBILE VIEW  | 

SNAKES-ANTIVENOMS

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Snake antivenoms have been produced to treat envenomations made up of three families that comprise venomous front-fanged snakes (i.e., elapids, vipers, and sea snakes). (NOTE: Sea snakes are not discussed in this management. Please refer to the SEA SNAKE MANAGEMENT as appropriate).
    B) Snake antivenoms are produced by using the serum of animals immunized with venom, and are a specific treatment for snake envenomations. Antivenom is given to reverse systemic symptoms and minimize and control further local injury.
    C) In general, antivenoms are effective and are able to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, the benefits of antivenom use are dependent on proper dosing and timely administration.

Specific Substances

    A) CONSTITUENTS OF THE GROUP
    1) Antivenoms-Snakes
    2) Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine)
    3) European viper venom antiserum
    4) Snake antivenoms
    5) Snake antivenin

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) SUMMARY
    a) A wide variety of polyvalent and monovalent antivenoms are available to treat indigenous venomous species worldwide. To produce an effective antivenom, researchers have examined the effects of venom variability which may include such factors as geographical variation, seasonal variation, diet, habitat, age-dependent change, and sexual dimorphism that can alter venom. The manufacture of antivenom requires an understanding of this variability in venom to ensure representation of all venom types required for each antivenom produced (Chippaux et al, 1991). Lastly, lyophilized antisera are considered to be a more stable product (Warrell, 1995).
    b) Historically, crude serum was used for therapy, but antivenom is purified in a stepwise sequence to reduce anaphylactic reactions (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    2) IMMUNOGLOBULIN G (IgG) ANTIVENOMS
    a) In general, IgG (a Y shaped molecule with a molecular weight of approximately 150 kDa) antivenoms obtained from fractionating blood from horses that have been injected with extracted venom. These antivenoms are easy to produce, but have been historically associated with more acute hypersensitivity reactions. The Fc (constant) portion of the molecule has no therapeutic effect, rather it may contribute to the antivenoms adverse effects by binding to Fc receptors IgE on human basophil and mast cells leading to type l hypersensitivity reactions. More recently, improved purification methods have improved the overall safety of these antivenoms. Alteration in methods (caprylic acid precipitation compared to ammonium sulphate methods) produce fewer protein aggregates and result in a safer product (Lavonas, 2012).
    3) FAB ANTIVENOMS and F(ab)2 ANTIVENOMS
    a) Fab (molecular weight 50 kDa) and F(ab')2 (molecular weight 100 kDa) antivenoms use only the Fab fragments of the IgG antibody. They are usually safer than intact IgG based antivenoms because the Fc portion of the molecule has been removed. Of these agents, Fab products appear to have some advantages by having a single antigen binding site and have no hinge region. Since Fab molecules cannot cross link cell bound IgE antibodies on mast cells, there can be no release of histamine or other inflammatory mediators. In addition, Fab molecules can enter the tissues more rapidly which can result in less tissue damage (ie, necrosis) and neurologic toxicity. By contrast, the smaller Fab molecules have a shorter half-life than many venom components, resulting in more frequent recurrence of venom effects compared to F(ab')2 and IgG antivenoms (Lavonas, 2012).
    4) SELECT LIST OF AVAILABLE ANTIVENOMS
    a) Below is a select list of antivenoms:
    1) There is currently only ONE antivenom available for the treatment of crotaline snake envenomation in the US.
    2) CroFab(R), CROTALIDAE POLYVALENT IMMUNE FAB (OVINE), is approved for the treatment of patients with North American crotalid envenomation (crotalid is used to described the Crotalinae subfamily of venomous snakes which includes rattlesnakes, copperheads and cottonmouths/water moccasins (SEE: United States Snakes Crotalinae management for complete dosing information) (Prod Info CroFab(R) intravenous injection, 2012).
    3) ANTIVENIN (MICRURUS FULVIUS): According to the FDA, Wyeth Pharmaceutical NO longer manufacturers Antivenin (micrurus fulvius) (Equine). There is no alternative product licensed in the United States for coral snake envenomations. Lot 4030026 was labeled for use up until October 31, 2012.
    4) EUROPEAN VIPER VENOM ANTISERUM: Contains the specific antitoxic globulins that have the ability to neutralize the venom of one or more viper species (i.e., Vipera ammodytes, V. aspis, V. berus, or V. ursinii). The globulins are obtained by fractionation of the serum of animals immunized against the venom(s). It should be stored at 2 to 8 degrees C and not allowed to freeze (S Sweetman , 2001).
    5) ASNA ANTIVENOM C (AV-C): This antivenom was marketed for use in Ghana for the treatment of West African carpet viper (Echis ocellatus) envenomations and was found to be ineffective. An investigational study of the treatment of E. ocellatus snakebites found a higher mortality rate (12.1%; 8/66) among patients receiving AV-C as compared to 1.8% (5/278) in the FAV-Afrique anitvenom (FAV-A). The patients in both groups were similar as to age and gender, as well as, clinical evidence of envenomation and degree of severe anemia at the time of admission. Despite clinical similarities, the AV-C group required twice the number of doses of antivenom to treat coagulopathies, as compared to the FAV-A group. On average, the total number of antivenom ampules needed in the FAV-A and AV-C groups were 5.2 and 11.7 (p<0.01), respectively. Of the patients that died in the AV-C group, the cause of death was uncontrolled bleeding (ie, cerebral, gastrointestinal, urinary) in most cases (Visser et al, 2008).
    B) SOURCES
    1) The following is a list of countries that manufacture snake ANTIVENOMS that are available to treat venomous snake bites. The list is comprised of antivenoms that treat both Viperidae (i.e., crotalids {pit vipers} and viperids) and Elapidae (i.e., cobras, kraits, coral snakes, and mambas) species. Sea snakes are NOT listed in this management. The list is divided by continents and countries as appropriate.
    2) CONTINENT OF AFRICA
    a) ALGERIA
    1) Antiviperin: SPECIES: Cerastes cerastes cerastes, Vipera lebetina lebetina (Manufacturer: Institute Pasteur d'Algeria, Algeria)
    b) MOROCCO
    1) Serum Antiviperin: SPECIES: Cerastes cerastes cerastes, Vipera lebetina lebetina (Manufacturer: Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Morocco)
    c) SOUTH AFRICA
    1) Boomslang Antivenom: SPECIES: Dispholidus typus typus (Manufacturer: South African Vaccine Producers (Pty) Ltd., South Africa)
    2) SAIMR Echis Carinatus Antivenom: SPECIES: Cerastes, cerastes cerastes, Cerastes cerastes sp., Cerastes vipera, Echis coloratus (Manufacturer: South African Vaccine Producers (Pty) Ltd., South Africa)
    3) SAIMR Polyvalent Snake Antivenom: SPECIES: Bitis areitans somalica, B areitans areitans, B arietans sp., B gabonica gabonica, B gabonica sp., B nasicornis, Bitis sp., Dendroaspis angusticeps, D jamesoni jamesoni, D jamesoni sp., D polylepis polylepis, D viridis, Hemachatus hemachatus, Hemachatus sp., Naja annulifera anchietae, Naja atra, Naje haje haje, N kaouthia, N katiensis, Naja sp. (Manufacturer: South African Vaccine Producers (Pty) Ltd., South Africa)
    d) EGYPT
    1) Anti-Cerastes Cerastes: SPECIES: Cerastes cerastes cerastes, C vipera (Manufacturer: Al Algousa Sharea, Egypt)
    e) CONTINENT OF ASIA
    1) BURMA
    1) Anti-Cobra Venom Serum: SPECIES: Naja kaouthia (Manufacturer: Myanma Pharmaceutical Industries, Burma)
    2) Anti-Viper Venom: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: Myanma Pharmaceutical Industries, Burma)
    3) Bivalent Venom Serum: SPECIES: Naja kaouthia (Manufacturer: Myanma Pharmaceutical Industries, Burma)
    a) CHINA
    1) Monovalent Snorkle-nosed Viper Antivenom: SPECIES: Deinagkistrodon acutus (Manufacturer: Ministry of Public Health, China)
    2) Krait Antivenom: SPECIES: Ophisophagus hannah (Manufacturer: Ministry of Public Health, China)
    3) Mamushi Antivenom: SPECIES: Trimeresurus stejnegeri stejnegeri (Manufacturer: Ministry of Public Health, China)
    4) Cobra Antivenom: SPECIES: Naja naja (Manufacturer: Ministry of Public Health)
    b) INDONESIA
    1) Anti Snake-Venom Serum: SPECIES: Bungarus fasciatus, Calloselasma rhodostoma,Naja sputatrix (Manufacturer: Perum Bio Farma (Pasteur Institute), Indonesia)
    c) JAPAN
    1) Mamushi: SPECIES: No species identifed (Manufacturer: Chiba Serum Institute, Japan)
    2) Habu: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: Chiba Serum Institute, Japan)
    3) Mamushi Antivenom: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: The Chemo Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute, Japan)
    4) Mamushi Antivenom: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan)
    5) Mamushi: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases, Osaka, Japan)
    6) Mamushi: SPECIES: No species identified (Manufacturer: Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan)
    d) PHILIPPINES
    1) Cobra Antivenin: SPECIES: Naja philippinensis (Manufacturer: Biologicals Production Service (Dept of Health Compound, Alabang), Philippines)
    e) TAIWAN
    1) Monovalent Antivenin Snorkel Viper: SPECIES: Deinagkistrodon acutus (Manufacturer: National Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan)
    2) Bivalent Antivenin Elapid: SPECIES: Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus, Naja atra (Manufacturer: National Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan)
    3) Bivalent Antivenin Pit Viper: SPECIES: Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus T. gramineus (Manufacturer: National Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan)
    4) Agkistrodon Acutus: SPECIES: Deinagkistrodon acutus (Manufacturer: National Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan)
    5) Banded-Krait Antivenin: SPECIES: Bungarus fasciatus (Manufacturer: National Institute of Preventive Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan)
    f) THAILAND
    1) Malayan Pit Viper Antivenin: SPECIES: Calloselasma rhodostoma rhodostoma, Calloselasma (Manufacturer: The Government Pharmaceutical Organization, Thailand)
    2) Russell's Viper Antivenin: SPECIES: No species indicated (Manufacturer: The Government Pharmaceutical Organization, Thailand)
    3) Cobra Antivenin: SPECIES: Naja kaouthia (Manufacturer: The Government Pharmaceutical Organization, Thailand)
    4) QSMI-Cobra Antivenin: SPECIES: Naja kaouthia, N sputatrix (Manufacturer: Queen Savoabha Memorial Institute, Thailand)
    5) QSMI-Malayan Pit Antivenin: SPECIES: Calloselasma rhodostoma rhodostoma (Manufacturer: Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thailand)
    6) QSMI-King Cobra Antivenin: SPECIES: Ophiophagus hannah (Manufacturer: Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thailand)
    7) QSMI-Banded Krait Antivenin: SPECIES: Bungarus fasciatus, B. candidus (Manufacturer: Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thailand)
    8) QSMI-Green Pit Viper Antivenom: SPECIES: Trimeresurus albolabris albolabris, T macrops, T purpreomaculatus (Manufacturer: Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thailand)
    g) AUSTRALIA
    1) Black Snake Antivenom: SPECIES: Pseudechis australis, P butleri, P colletti (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia)
    2) Brown Snake Antivenom: SPECIES: Psudonaja affinis, P. nuchalis, P. textilis (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia)
    3) Death Adder Antivenom: SPECIES: Acanthophis antarctius, A pyrrhus, A praelongus, A wllsii (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia)
    4) Polyvalent Antivenom: SPECIES: Pseudechis papuanus, Pseudechis porphyriacus, Psuedonaja affinis, Psuedonaja nuchalis, Acanthopis antarcticus, Oxyuranus scutellatus, Notechis scutatus, Notechis ater humphreysi, Notechis ater serventyi (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia)
    5) Taipan: SPECIES: Oxyuranus scutellatus (common taipan), O scutellatus canni, O microlepidotus (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia)
    6) Tiger Snake: SPECIES: Austrelaps labialis, A ramsayi, A superbus, Hoplocephalus bitorquatus, H bungaroides, H stephensii, Notechis ater, N ater occidentalis, N scutatus and Tropidechis carinatus. It has also been used for Pseudechis guttatus (Spotted- or Blue-bellied black snake) or Pseudechis porphyriacus (Red-bellied Black snake) envenomation. (Manufacturer: CSL Limited, Australia).
    h) CENTRAL AMERICA
    1) COSTA RICA
    1) Anti-Coral Picado: SPECIES: Species: Micrurus nigrocinctus, M nigrocinctus sp., M carinicauda, M fulvius fitzingeri, M fulvius maculatus, M fulvius microgalbineus, M fulvius sp. (Manufacturer: Instituto Clodomiro Picado, Costa Rica).
    2) Polyvalent Antivenom: SPECIES: Acanthophis antarcticus, A antarcticus laevis, A antarcticus rugosus, Agkistrodon bilineatus bilineatus, A bilineatus sp., Bothriechis aurifer, B bicolor, B nigroviridis, Bothriopsis punctata, Bothrops asper, Crotalus durissus durissus, Lachesis muta, Porthidium godmani, other Porthidium species (Manufacturer: Instituto Clodomiro Picado, Costa Rica). (Does NOT cover South American rattlesnakes)
    2) EUROPE
    a) BULGARIA
    1) Monovalent Antivenom: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes (Manufacturer: Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology)
    b) FRANCE
    1) Serum Antivenimeux Lelong: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes, V aspis aspis, V berus berus (Manufacturer: Laboratoires Lelong, France)
    2) ViperFav Equine European Viper Antivenom: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes, V ammodytes sp., V aspis aspis, V aspis sp., V. berus berus, V berus sp., (Manufacturer: Aventis Pasteur S.A., France)
    3) Ipser Europe Pasteur: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes, V ammodytes sp., V aspis aspis, V aspis sp., V berus berus, V berus sp., (Manufacturer: Pasteur Merieux Connaught, France)
    4) Ipser Afrique Pasteur: SPECIES: Bitis arietans arietans, B. gabonica gabonica, B nasicornis, Dendroaspis jamesoni jamesoni, D polylepis polylepis, D virdis, Echis carinatus carinatus, Naja haje haje, N melanoleuca, N nigricollis nigricollis (Manufacturer: Pasteur Merieux Connaught, France)
    5) Antirept Pasteur: SPECIES: Bitis arietans arietans, Cerastes cerastes cerastes, C vipera, Echis carinatus carinatus, E pyramidum, E coloratus, Naje haje haje, Vipera lebetina lebetina, V palestinae (Manufacturer: Pasteur Merieux Connaught, France)
    c) GERMANY
    1) North and West Africa Polyvalent: SPECIES: Bitis gabonica gabonica, B arietans arietans, Cerastes cerastes, C. vipera, Echis carinatus carinatus, Naja haje haje, N. melanoleuca, N. nigricollis nigricollis, Vipera lebetina lebetina (Manufacturer: Chiron Behring Gmbh and Co., Germany)
    2) Central Africa Polyvalent: SPECIES: Bitis gabonica gabonica, B gabonica sp., B rhinoceros, B arietans somalica, B arietans arietans, B arietans sp., B nasicornis, Dendroaspis polylepis sp., D viridis, Naja haje, N melanoleuca, N nigricollis, Hemachatus haemachatus (Manufacturer: Chiron Behring Gmbh and Co., Germany)
    3) Near and Middle East Polyvalent: SPECIES : V. lebetina, V lebetina sp., V. xanthina (Manufacturer: Chiron Behring Gmbh and Co., Germany)
    4) Europe Polyvalent: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes, V. aspis apis, V. berus berus, V. lebetina lebetina, V. xanthina (Manufacturer: Chiron Behring Gmbh and Co., Germany)
    d) ITALY
    1) Antiviperin: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes (Manufacturer: Instituto Sieroterapico (e Vaccinogeno Toscano 'Sclavo', Italy)
    e) SWITERLAND
    1) Serum Antivenimeux Berna: SPECIES: Vipera ammodytes ammodytes, V aspis aspis, V. berus berus (Manufacturer: Institut Serotherapique et Vaccinal Suisse, Switerzland)
    f) INDIA
    1) Indian Krait Antivenom: SPECIES: Bungarus caeruleus (Manufacturer: Haffkine Bio- Pharmaceutical Corp Ltd., India)
    2) Polyvalent Snake Antivenom Serum: SPECIES: Bungarus caeruleus, Echis carinatus carinatus, Naja naja (Manufacturer: Bengal Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., India)
    3) Lyophilised Polyvalent: SPECIES: Bungarus caeruleus, Daboia russelli russelli, D russelli siamensis, D russelli sp., Echis carinatus carinatus, Echis carinatus sp., and Naja naja (Manufacturer: Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp Ltd., India)
    4) Indian Cobra Antivenom: SPECIES: Naja Naja (Manufacturer: Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp Ltd., India)
    5) Russell's Viper Antivenom: SPECIES: No species specified ( (Manufacturer: Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp Ltd., India)
    g) IRAN
    1) Cobra Antivenom: SPECIES: Naja oxiana (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    2) Echis Antivenom: SPECIES: Echis carinatus carinatus (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    3) Latifii Antivenom: SPECIES: Vipera latifii (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    4) Lebetina Antivenom: SPECIES: Vipera lebetina (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    5) Persica Antivenom: SPECIES: Pseudocerastes persicus fieldi, Pseudocerastes persicus sp. (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    6) Polyvalent Antivenom: SPECIES: Echis carinatus carinatus, Naja oxiana, Pseudocerastes persicus, Pseudocerastes persicus sp., V latifii, V lebetina (Manufacturer: Razi Institute, Iran)
    h) ISRAEL
    1) Arabian Echis Snake Antivenom: SPECIES: Echis coloratus (Manufacturer: Rogoff Medical Research Institute, Israel)
    2) Palestine Viper Snake Antivenom: SPECIES: Vipera palestinae (Manufacturer: Rogoff Medical Research Institute, Israel)
    3) NORTH AMERICA
    a) UNITED STATES
    1) There is currently only ONE antivenom available for the treatment of crotaline snake envenomation in the US.
    2) CroFab(R), CROTALIDAE POLYVALENT IMMUNE FAB (OVINE), is approved for the treatment of patients with North American crotalid envenomation (crotalid is used to described the Crotalinae subfamily of venomous snakes which includes rattlesnakes, copperheads and cottonmouths/water moccasins (Prod Info CroFab(R) intravenous injection, 2012).
    b) MEXICO
    1) Suero Antiviperino Polivalent Equino Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops asper, Crotalus basiliscus (Manufacturer: Secretaria de Salud (Gerencia General de Biologicos y Reactivos)
    2) Antivipmyn Polyvalent equine anti-viper serum: SPECIES: Agkistrodon sp., Agkistrodon billineatus, A contortrix, A piscivorus, Bothriopsis alboncarinata, B alticola, Bothriechis aurifer, Bothriechis bicolor, Bothriopsis billineatus sp., Bothrocophias sp., Bothrops sp. Crotalus sp., Lachesis sp., Orphryacus sp., Porthidium sp., Sistrurus sp. (Manufacturer: Bioclon, S.A.DE.C.V. Mexico)
    3) Antivipmyn Tri: SPECIES: Agkistrodon sp., Bothriopsis sp., Bothriechis sp. Bothrocophias sp., Bothrops sp., Crotalus sp., Lachesis sp., Orphryacus sp., Porthidium sp. (Manufacturer: Bioclon, S.A.DE.C.V. Mexico)
    c) PAKISTAN
    1) Monovalent Antivenom Serum: SPECIES: Bungarus sp, Echis carinatus carinatus (Manufacturer: Biological Production Division (National Institute of Health), Pakistan)
    2) Polyvalent Antivenom Serum: SPECIES: Bitis sp, Naja sp. Hemachatus sp., Dendroaspis sp., Echis carinatus carinatus (Manufacturer: South African Vaccine Producers (Pty) Ltd).
    d) SOUTH AMERICA
    1) ARGENTINA
    1) Bothrops Bi-Valent Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops alternatus, B neuwiedi neuwiedi, B ammodytoides (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Microbiologia)
    2) Tropical Trivalent Antivenom: SPECIES: B alternatus, B neuwiedi neuwiedi, Crotalus durissus terrificus (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Microbiologia)
    3) Bothrops Tetravalent Antivenom: SPECIES: B alternatus, B neuwiedi neuwiedi, B jararaca, B jararacussu (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Microbiologia)
    4) Antimicrurus Antivenom: SPECIES: Numerous Micrurus species including: M alleni, M averyi, M bernadi, M browni, M browni ssp., M corallinus, M frontalis, M fulvius microgalbineus (Manufacturer: Ejercito Argentino; Instituto Nacional de Microbiologia)
    5) Anticrotalus Antivenom: SPECIES: Crotalus d. terrificus (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Microbiologia)
    6) Antibothrops bivalente Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrop species (Manufacturer: Ejercito Argentino)
    2) BRAZIL
    1) Soro Anti-Bothropico Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops jararaca, B. juraracusu, B. cotiara, B. moojeni, B. alternatus, B. neuweidi (Manufacturer: Instituto Butantan)
    2) Soro Anti-Crotalico Antiveonm: SPECIES: Crotalus genus (Manufacturer: Instituto Butantan)
    3) Soro Anti-Bothropico Crotalico Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops and Crotalus genus (Manufacturer: Instituto Butantan)
    4) Soro Anti-Elapidico Antivenom: SPECIES: Micrurus genus (Manufacturer: Fundaco Ezequiel Dias)
    5) Soro Anti-Bothropico Laquetico Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops species, plus Lachesis muta (Manufacturer: Instituto Butantan)
    3) COLOMBIA
    1) Antiveneno Polivalente Antivenom: SPECIES: Lachesis muta, Bothrop columblanus, Crotalus durissus Terrificus (Manufacturer: Grupo de Suero)
    2) Anti-Bothrops Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops Asper (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Higiene)
    4) EUCADOR
    1) Anti-Bothrops Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrops Asper (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Higiene)
    5) PERU
    1) Suero Antilachesico Monovalente Antivenom: SPECIES: Lachesis muta (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Salud)
    2) Suero Anticrotalico Monovalente Antivenom: SPECIES: Crotalus durissus Terrificus (Manufacturer: Instituto Nacional de Salud)
    6) SPAIN
    1) Polyvalent Antivenom against vipers: SPECIES: Vipera genus, Cerastes sp. (Manufacturer: Centro de Estandardizacion de Venenenos y Antivenenos (C.E.V.A.)
    2) Vipera latasti Antivenom: SPECIES: V.l. latasti, V.l. monticola (Manufacturer: Centro de Estandardizacion de Venenenos y Antivenenos (C.E.V.A.)
    7) VENEZUELA
    1) Suero Antiofidico polyvalent Antivenom: SPECIES: Bothrop atrox, Crotalus d. cumanensis (Manufacturer: Universidad Central de Venezuela)
    3) REFERENCES: (American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 2009; Clinical Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital, 2001; Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital, 2001; Toxinology Department, Women & Children's Hospital, 2001; Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital, 2001; Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital, 2011; Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital, 2001).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USE: Antivenom therapy is the primary treatment of snake envenomation.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Antivenoms are effective based on their ability to complex an antigen with the appropriate antibody, thus neutralizing the antigen. Antivenom is produced through inoculation of the venom into an animal. Crude venom is generally poorly tolerated. Newer antivenoms are purified using multiple methods such as protein precipitation, digestion (to fragments such as Fab and Fab2) and affinity chromatography. A product can be designed to work against single venom (monovalent) or multiple venoms (polyvalent).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: The two primary risks associated with antivenom therapy are anaphylaxis and serum sickness. The likelihood of developing serum sickness is related to the amount of antivenom administered and the likelihood of developing anaphylaxis varies with the type of antivenom (intact IgG more immunogenic than Fab or Fab2 fragments).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Snake antivenoms are widely used in area of the world with indigenous venomous snakes.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Most adverse effects from antivenoms are secondary to immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Generalized urticaria, fever, itching, palpitations, nausea and vomiting can develop with an early anaphylactoid reaction. Severe anaphylaxis with bronchospasm, laryngeal edema and hypotension has occurred and can be fatal. Serum sickness can develop 5 days to 3 weeks after antivenom administration and is more common when larger amounts of antivenom are used. Clinical effects include fever, rash, myalgias, malaise, and in rare cases proteinuria and neuritis.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Antivenom plasma concentrations are not clinically useful nor readily available for most antivenoms.
    C) Monitor patients carefully (vital signs, skin exam, lung exam, pulse oximetry) for evidence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction during antivenom infusion.
    D) Monitor laboratory studies as appropriate for the type of envenomation being treated.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.6) PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Mild anaphylactoid reactions such as rash and urticaria often respond to further diluting the antivenom and administering it at a slower infusion rate, and administering antihistamines and corticosteroids.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treat anaphylaxis by immediately stopping antivenom infusion and administering antihistamines, corticosteroids and epinephrine. Endotracheal intubation and inhaled beta agonists may also be necessary. Treat bradycardia, asystole per ACLS guidelines.
    C) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Early endotracheal intubation should be considered in any patient with upper airway edema or severe respiratory distress.
    D) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    E) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Enhanced elimination is not useful.
    F) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: None.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients treated with snake antivenom are generally observed for recurrent symptoms.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with ongoing allergic or envenomation symptoms should be admitted to an ICU setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients who have allergic reactions or who do not respond to antivenom.
    G) PITFALLS
    1) Not carefully observing patients for the development of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions during antivenom infusion.
    H) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Antivenom directly binds components by venom-specific IgG contained in the antivenom. The composition of antivenom can vary depending on the degree of purification and the degree of antibody fragments [IgG, F(ab')2 or F(ab)]. In general, venom distributes mainly into the tissue compartments, while IgG and F(ab')2 has minimal distribution out of the plasma; therefore they are unable to neutralize venom within the tissue. F(ab')2 fragments have a volume of distribution that is approximately twice as high as plasma volume, which suggests a poor distribution into tissue. Fab fragments distribute more rapidly than whole IgG. IgG has a concentration peak that is reached in 6 hours in superficial tissue and 30 hours for deep tissue. The elimination half-life is based on the type of molecule. IgG elimination half-life is greater than 100 hours, F(ab')2 elimination half-life is around 60 hours, and F(ab) elimination half-life is around 10 hours. F(ab) is excreted via the kidneys.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXIC DOSE: Toxic doses have not been well established; however, the likelihood of serum sickness increases with higher doses of antivenom.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: The loading dose and maintenance doses vary by antivenom. Consult package insert for initial dosing and consult a poison control center for any questions.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USE: Antivenom therapy is the primary treatment of snake envenomation.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Antivenoms are effective based on their ability to complex an antigen with the appropriate antibody, thus neutralizing the antigen. Antivenom is produced through inoculation of the venom into an animal. Crude venom is generally poorly tolerated. Newer antivenoms are purified using multiple methods such as protein precipitation, digestion (to fragments such as Fab and Fab2) and affinity chromatography. A product can be designed to work against single venom (monovalent) or multiple venoms (polyvalent).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: The two primary risks associated with antivenom therapy are anaphylaxis and serum sickness. The likelihood of developing serum sickness is related to the amount of antivenom administered and the likelihood of developing anaphylaxis varies with the type of antivenom (intact IgG more immunogenic than Fab or Fab2 fragments).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Snake antivenoms are widely used in area of the world with indigenous venomous snakes.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Most adverse effects from antivenoms are secondary to immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Generalized urticaria, fever, itching, palpitations, nausea and vomiting can develop with an early anaphylactoid reaction. Severe anaphylaxis with bronchospasm, laryngeal edema and hypotension has occurred and can be fatal. Serum sickness can develop 5 days to 3 weeks after antivenom administration and is more common when larger amounts of antivenom are used. Clinical effects include fever, rash, myalgias, malaise, and in rare cases proteinuria and neuritis.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) PYROGENIC REACTION: A fever may develop in an individual receiving antivenom therapy due to contamination of the antivenin by endotoxin-like compounds. Initial effects are chills with cutaneous vasoconstriction, gooseflesh and shivering. Temperature rises slowly during rigors with intense vasodilation, widening pulse pressure and a drop in mean arterial pressure. Onset usually occurs within 1 to 2 hours of therapy (Otero et al, 1996; Ariaratnam et al, 2001; Singh et al, 2001).
    B) Febrile convulsions have been reported in children at the peak of fever (Warrell, 1995).
    C) In one study, pyrogens were detected in the antivenom (determined by animal testing) after patients developed a high incidence of fever and chills (Otero-Patino et al, 1998).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Hypotension can be mild to severe following antivenom administration. It is characteristic of anaphylactic shock, and can be a life threatening complication of antivenom therapy (Heard et al, 1999; Dart & McNally, 2001; Dart & McNally, 2001). It occurs as a result of vasodilatation and capillary leakage (Heard et al, 1999).
    1) Hypotension has been reported with the following antivenoms: SAIMR polyvalent snake antivenom, Haffkine Indian polyspecific antivenom, and Antivenom (Crotalidae) Wyeth Polyvalent (Moran et al, 1998; Heard et al, 1999; Ariaratnam et al, 2001), and is theoretically possible with any antivenom therapy.
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Tachycardia has been described as an early adverse response to antivenom therapy (Warrell, 1995; Otero et al, 1996).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Cough can occur as part of an early response (within minutes) to antivenom therapy (Warrell, 1995).
    b) Wheezing, dyspnea, or bronchospasm may develop as a result of an anaphylactoid response to antivenom therapy (Warrell, 1995; Weber & White, 1993; Otero et al, 1996; Moran et al, 1998; Heard et al, 1999; Dart & McNally, 2001).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) CASE REPORT: Acute lung injury associated with a severe anaphylactoid response was reported in an 11-year-old boy after being treated with a polyvalent anti-snake venom serum (i.e., CRI, Kasauli, India) for a cobra bite to the hand. Respiratory distress progressed and intubation and ventilation were required. The patient was weaned off the ventilator within 34 hours and was discharged to home on hospital day 7 with normal respiratory function (Singh et al, 2001).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NEURITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Neuritis is a rare complication of serum sickness from antivenom therapy (Heard et al, 1999).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA, VOMITING AND DIARRHEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Antivenom therapy has been associated with the development of an early anaphylactoid reaction, and can include the following gastrointestinal effects: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain (Otero et al, 1996).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ABNORMAL RENAL FUNCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Glomerulonephritis is a rare complication of serum sickness from antivenom therapy (Heard et al, 1999).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) URTICARIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Urticaria and intense itching (especially the scalp) are common early reactions to antivenom therapy. It has been reported in both whole IgG and refined immunoglobulin products such as F(ab')2 fragments and F(ab) fragments (Warrell, 1995; Moran et al, 1998; Heard et al, 1999; Singh et al, 2001).
    b) CASE SERIES: Of 17 patients receiving South African Institute for Medical Research (SAIMR) polyvalent snake antivenom (used for the 10 most venomous snakes in southern Africa), 13 (76%) developed early severe reactions with 12 patients developing urticaria (Moran et al, 1998).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANAPHYLACTOID REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Antivenom therapy can be associated with the development of an early anaphylactoid reaction (EAR), which occurs within minutes (10 to 60 minutes) of receiving therapy. It is usually due to complement activation by the antivenom, and not IgE mediated hypersensitivity (Warrell, 1995; Singh et al, 2001).
    2) COMMON SYMPTOMS: Generalized urticaria, fever, itching, palpitation, nausea and vomiting can develop with an early anaphylactoid reaction, and usually responds to epinephrine, antihistamines and steroids (Isbister et al, 2006; Singh et al, 2001).
    3) INCIDENCE: The incidence and severity of early reactions may be dose and rate related, but this has not been proven in prospective studies (Malasit et al, 1986).
    4) PRODUCT VARIATION: Manufacturers have attempted to reduce adverse reactions by developing methods to purify antivenoms using pepsin or papain digestion and chromatographic techniques to obtain F(ab')2 or Fab' preparations (Otero-Patino et al, 1998).
    a) EARs have been reported with many different types of antivenoms.
    b) SKIN TESTING TO DETECT POSSIBLE REACTIONS
    1) SKIN TESTING: Skin or conjunctival sensitivity testing has been shown to be unpredictable in detecting early reactions to antivenom therapy or to late serum sickness effects (Malasit et al, 1986; Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998; Singh et al, 2001).
    a) A negative test does not exclude a hypersensitivity reaction. In a test of a 100 patients treated with antivenin (crotalidae) polyvalent, 80% of patients that developed any type of reaction had a negative skin test (Heard et al, 1999).
    b) In one study, 4 (36%) of 11 children that had negative skin tests developed an adverse reaction to an equine polyvalent antivenom (Weber & White, 1993).
    c) SELECT ANTIVENOMS
    1) CROTALIDAE POLYVALENT IMMUNE FAB ANTIVENOM: An observational study was conducted to determine the incidence of possible hypersensitivity reactions in adults and children treated with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) (CroFab; FabAV) following envenomation by a North American rattlesnake. A total of 93 patients with a mean age of 34.5 years (range: 16 months to 91 years) received a mean dose of 12 vials of antivenom (range: 4 to 32 vials). Five (5.4%) patients developed acute hypersensitivity reactions. Of those 5 patients, only one patient developed a severe reaction requiring treatment with epinephrine, antihistamines and steroids with discontinuation of antivenom therapy. The remaining 4 patients developed relatively minor symptoms (treated effectively with antihistamine and/or steroid therapy), and were able to complete a full course of antivenom therapy (Cannon et al, 2008).
    2) SRI LANKA RUSSELL VIPER/COMPARATIVE TRIAL: Ariaratnam et al (2001) reported fewer adverse events among patients receiving an ovine Fab fragment antivenom (PolongaTAb{TM}) than an equine IgG antivenom purified with pepsin to produce F(ab')2 fragments to treat daboia russelii russelii (Russell's viper) envenomations (Ariaratnam et al, 2001).
    3) OVINE FAB: In one study, 4 (57%) of 7 patients developed early anaphylactoid reaction (EAR) after receiving ovine Fab antivenom (Meyer et al, 1997).
    4) EQUINE POLYVALENT: Fourteen (35.9%) of 39 patients developed EAR, with 9 patients developing effects within 2 hours of antivenom therapy. Urticaria was the most common symptom reported, followed by fever, chills, mild hypotension, generalized rash and nausea (Otero et al, 1996).
    5) TIGER SNAKE ANTIVENOM: During a 2 month multicenter study of snake bites in Australia, a high rate of early anaphylactoid reaction (EAR) were observed following the administration of tiger snake antivenom. Of the 14 patients that received tiger snake antivenom, 11 patients developed immediate hypersensitivity reaction which were mild in 5 patients, moderate in 3, and severe in 3 cases. Symptoms of anaphylaxis occurred in 6 patients and 9 patients were treated with epinephrine. In all patients, antivenom was restarted with 4 patients requiring a concomitant epinephrine infusion to complete antivenom therapy (Isbister et al, 2006).
    a) Its suggested that tiger snake antivenom may produce an increased risk of anaphylactoid reaction due to its ability to bind complement. To potentially avoid a reaction, adequate dilution of the antivenom (1:10 for adults and 1:5 in small children) should be done prior to infusion. Epinephrine (1:1000) should also be readily available (Leong, 2006).
    6) BOTHROP ANTIVENOMS: A randomized, blinded, comparative trial of one pepsin digested {F(ab')2} and two whole IgG antivenoms was conducted to determine overall safety and efficacy of each product. It was found that the whole IgG antivenom obtained by caprylic acid fractionation resulted in less early anaphylactoid reactions (11.1%) than the F(ab')2 product (36.7%) or the monovalent whole IgG antivenom (81.8%). The authors concluded that pepsin digested antivenoms do NOT produce the lowest incidence of EARs; further study of this method was suggested (Otero-Patino et al, 1998).
    B) ANAPHYLAXIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) COMMON EFFECTS: Severe systemic anaphylaxis can include the following: bronchospasm, hypotension or angioedema along with shock (Warrell, 1995; Heard et al, 1999).
    b) CASE SERIES/ANTIVENIN (CROTALIDAE) POLYVALENT/UNITED STATES: Nine of 23 patients treated with antivenom developed severe anaphylactic reactions with shock symptoms. Of those with advanced allergic reactions, the mean age was 34.5 years. The authors concluded that younger patients appeared to tolerate antivenom better even though they were generally more ill (White & Weber, 1991).
    C) TRANSFUSION REACTION DUE TO SERUM PROTEIN REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Serum sickness can occur between 5 to 24 days after antivenom therapy (Warrell, 1995; Singh et al, 2001). It is a type III hypersensitivity response, and develops due to the formation of antigen-antibody complexes (Heard et al, 1999). Cases usually present with fever, itching, urticaria, arthralgia and sometimes lymphadenopathy and albuminuria. Individuals usually respond to therapy with antihistamines, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and steroids (Singh et al, 2001). In severe cases, neurotoxic symptoms may be present (Warrell, 1995).
    b) MECHANISM: Late serum sickness type reactions are likely due to complement activation by immune complexes (aggregates) (Malasit et al, 1986).
    D) CASE REPORT
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) PIT VIPERS/UNITED STATES: In the US, Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (ACP), a horse serum derived antivenom, and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (FabAV) {approved for use in 2000} derived from sheep serum are used in the treatment of pit viper envenomations. Both therapies have produced serum sickness. It is a relatively common complication of ACP therapy and has been reported in both adults and children (Weber & White, 1993). Based on literature reports, the rate is variable, but dosing with 3 or more vials of ACP appears to increase the risk of developing serum sickness (Dart & McNally, 2001; Heard et al, 1999).
    1) In two trials, the overall rate was 16% (6/38 patients) for the sheep derived antivenom. Due to limited experience with FabAV, further studies are indicated (Dart & McNally, 2001).
    2) INCIDENCE RATE
    1) Polyvalent Crotalid Fab (CroTab(R)): Less than 10%
    2) Micrurus (coral snake) Antivenom: 10%
    b) VIPERA BERUS/EUROPE: In a comparison study, 30 patients received 2 ampules of viper venom antiserum containing equine F(ab')2 fragments. Ten percent (n=3) of the treated patients developed a reaction. Serum sickness developed in 2 patients, with exanthema, arthritis and albuminuria reported (Karlson-Stiber & Persson, 1994).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Antivenom plasma concentrations are not clinically useful nor readily available for most antivenoms.
    C) Monitor patients carefully (vital signs, skin exam, lung exam, pulse oximetry) for evidence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction during antivenom infusion.
    D) Monitor laboratory studies as appropriate for the type of envenomation being treated.

Methods

    A) ELISA STUDY
    1) SUMMARY: ELISA immunodiagnostic tests have been developed to identify the type of snake responsible for envenomation. ELISA tests can also be used to evaluate antivenom levels in patients, and determine the efficacy and adequacy of an antivenom dose (Choumet et al, 1996; Otero et al, 1996; Amaral et al, 1997; Meyer et al, 1997). This method allows for quantification of the circulating venom in the blood or body fluids at anytime during the course of illness, and antivenom concentrations can also be determined (Theakston, 1997).
    2) Based on these tests, a correlation between the quantity of circulating venom and the severity of clinical symptoms have been proposed (i.e., severity scores). Some authors have found that the amount of circulating venom (or rate of urinary venom) correlates with the severity of the clinical score indicating that the ELISA tests had good predictive value (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    B) OTHER
    1) Bedside venom detection kits (VDK) have been used widely in Australia, and are based on an enzyme immunoassay for the rapid confirmation or detection of the implicated species (Trevett et al, 1995; White, 1998).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.2) DISPOSITION/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.2.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) Patients with ongoing allergic or envenomation symptoms should be admitted to an ICU setting.
    6.3.2.2) HOME CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) None.
    6.3.2.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients who have allergic reactions or who do not respond to antivenom.
    6.3.2.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) Patients treated with snake antivenom are generally observed for recurrent symptoms.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Antivenom plasma concentrations are not clinically useful nor readily available for most antivenoms.
    C) Monitor patients carefully (vital signs, skin exam, lung exam, pulse oximetry) for evidence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction during antivenom infusion.
    D) Monitor laboratory studies as appropriate for the type of envenomation being treated.

Summary

    A) TOXIC DOSE: Toxic doses have not been well established; however, the likelihood of serum sickness increases with higher doses of antivenom.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: The loading dose and maintenance doses vary by antivenom. Consult package insert for initial dosing and consult a poison control center for any questions.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) GENERAL
    1) SUMMARY - The dose of antivenom used is dependent on the snake, the time between the bite and antivenom therapy, clinical symptoms (e.g., neurotoxicity, coagulopathies, cardiotoxicity, progressive rapid swelling, or bites on fingers or toes). Generally, a more specific antivenom is optimal (Warrell, 1995).
    2) The precise amount of antivenom is often unknown, but high doses may be necessary to effectively treat symptoms. Clinical response is generally used to guide dosing. In recent years, the use of ELISAs (enzyme linked immunosorbent assays) can provide objective information to guide antivenom dosing (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    3) In general, dosing has to be adapted to the quantity of inoculated venom as evaluated by biological tests (when possible), or according to the average glandular capacity of the snake and not based on the body weight of the patient (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998). Often the initial dose may not neutralize all the venom and further therapy is required (Warrell, 1995; White, 1995).
    4) Immunotherapy should be given as soon as possible. Even if a delay in treatment occurs, antivenom therapy should still be considered because of effects (e.g., DIC-like syndrome with Echis species) that can develop many hours after envenomation (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    5) The intravenous route is recommended because of rapid distribution and the bioavailability of the antivenom are higher than other routes. It is usually diluted in 0.9% saline and given by slow intravenous infusion. This method allows for easy control of adverse events. Intramuscular injection is considered less efficient, but does tend to minimize severe adverse effects. Avoid subcutaneous injections at the site of the bite, because it is ineffective, painful and may increase local complications (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    6) NOTE: Dosing information for monovalent and polyvalent antivenoms indigenous to species around the world is beyond the scope of this management. Refer to the manufacturer's recommendations for dosing and administration.
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) GENERAL
    1) Generally, antivenom dosing for children should be the same as an adult dose (Warrell, 1995). Refer to manufacture's information as indicated.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Severe anaphylactic shock is a rare complication of antivenom therapy and occurs in less than one in a thousand treatments (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    2) The two primary risks associated with antivenom therapy are anaphylaxis and serum sickness (Warrell, 1995; Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) SUMMARY -
    1) MECHANISM - Antivenoms are effective based on their ability to complex an antigen with the appropriate antibody. The antigen is neutralized (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    2) Antivenom is produced through inoculation of the venom into an animal and development is dependent on the toxicity and immunogenicity of the venom, the animal model used for immunization, and the quality of the immune response of the animal. The optimum dose for immunization is generally obtained by trail and error to acquire sufficient antibody titre. Horses are the preferred animal for immunization because of the large blood volume available, but other species have been used (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    3) Since crude venom is generally poorly tolerated by the animal, toxoids have been developed by biological detoxification of the venom which can preserve the immunogenicity of the venom. The usual toxoiding procedures are complexing with an aldehyde such as formalin or glutaraldehyde (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    4) Along with detoxification, the venom preparation that is used for immunization also contains an adjuvant. Although its exact role is not clearly understood, it is thought to act in a controlled manner by decreasing the rate of release of venom and thus stimulating further the immunological response. Bentonite, aluminium hydroxide and sodium alginate are commonly used adjuvants (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    5) Antivenoms are monospecific if only one venom is used. Polyspecific antivenom is developed by giving the immune animal a pool of venoms from several different species. Choosing either type is dependent on several factors (e.g., polyspecific may give better protection and a pool of venoms may act in some cases to synergistically induce the optimum immune response, monospecific may produce less reactions) (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    6) The purification of antivenom is done in successive steps to reduce the incidence of anaphylactic reactions. After elimination of cellular elements by centrifugation, non-immune proteins (especially albumin), are removed by precipitation with ammonium sulphate. The immunoglobulins are digested using either pepsin to produce F(ab)2 or papain to produce a smaller F(ab) fragment (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    7) Antivenoms remain stable for several years if they remain in the liquid form and are kept refrigerated (4 to 8 degrees C). Neutralizing properties remain intact for at least 5 years in the liquid form and for longer in the lyophilized form (Chippaux & Goyffon, 1998).
    B) SPECIFIC ANTIVENOMS
    1) ANTIVENIN (CROTALIDAE) POLYVALENT
    a) Consists of partially purified equine serum from horses immunized with crotalid snake venoms. It directly binds venom components by venom-specific IgG contained in the antivenom (Bogdan et al, 2000).

General Bibliography

    1) Amaral CFS, Campolina D, & Dias MB: Time factor in the detection of circulating whole venom and crotoxin and efficacy of antivenom therapy in patients envenomed by crotalus durissus. Toxicon 1997; 35:699-704.
    2) American Zoo and Aquarium Association: Antivenom Index. American Zoo and Aquarium Association. Silver Spring, MD. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.aza.org/ai/index.cfm. As accessed 2009-04-13.
    3) Ariaratnam CA, Sjostrom L, & Raziek Z: An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by sri lankan russell's viper (daboia russelii russelii). Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95:74-80.
    4) Bogdan GM, Dart RC, & Falbo SC: Recurrent coagulopathy after antivenom treatment of crotalid snakebite. So Med J 2000; 93:562-566.
    5) Cannon R , Ruha AM , & Kashani J : Acute hypersensitivity reactions associated with administration of crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab antivenom. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 51(4):407-411.
    6) Chippaux JP & Goyffon M: Review article: Venoms, antivenoms and immunotherapy. Toxicon 1998; 36:823-846.
    7) Chippaux JP, Williams V, & White J: Snake venom variability: methods of sutdy, results and interpretation. Toxicon 1991; 29:1279-1303.
    8) Choumet V, Audebert F, & Riviere G: New approaches in antivenom therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol 1996; 391:515-520.
    9) Clinical Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital: CSL Polyvalent Snake Antivenom. Clinical Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_polyvalen.html. As accessed 2012-10-10.
    10) Dart RC & McNally J: Efficacy, safety, and use of snake antivenoms in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37:181-188.
    11) Gillissen A, Theakston RDG, & Barth J: Neurotoxicity, haemostatic disturbances and haemolytic anaemia after a bite by a tunisian saw-scaled or carpet viper (Echis pyramidum complex): failure of antivenom treatment. Toxicon 1994; 32:937-944.
    12) Gomez HF & Dart RC: Clinical toxicology of snakebite in north america, in Meier J & White J (eds): Handbook of Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, pp 619-644.
    13) Habib AG : Effect of pre-medication on early adverse reactions following antivenom use in snakebite: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2011; 34(10):869-880.
    14) Heard K, O'Malley GF, & Dart RC: Antivenom therapy in the americas. Drugs 1999; 58:5-15.
    15) Isbister GK, Brown SG, MacDonald E, et al: Current use of Australian snake antivenoms and frequency of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. Med J Aust 2008; 188(8):473-476.
    16) Isbister GK, Tankel AS, White J, et al: High rate of immediate systemic hypersensitivity reactions to tiger snake antivenom. Med J Aust 2006; 184(8):419-420.
    17) Judge RK, Henry PJ, Mirtschin P, et al: Toxins not neutralized by brown snake antivenom. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2006; 213(2):117-125.
    18) Karlson-Stiber C & Persson H: Antivenom treatment in vipera berus envenoming - report of 30 cases. J Intern Med 1994; 235:57-61.
    19) Lavonas EJ : Antivenoms for snakebite: design, function, and controversies. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2012; 13(10):1980-1986.
    20) Leong J: High rate of immediate systemic hypersensitivity reactions to tiger snake antivenom. Comment. Med J Aust 2006; 184(8):420-.
    21) Lieberman P, Nicklas R, Randolph C, et al: Anaphylaxis-a practice parameter update 2015. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 115(5):341-384.
    22) Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, et al: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126(3):477-480.
    23) Malasit P, Warrell DA, & Chanthavanich P: Prediction, prevention, and mechanism of early (anaphylactic) antivenom reactions in victims of snake bites. Br Med J 1986; 292:17-20.
    24) Meyer WP, Habib AG, & Onayade AA: First clinical expereinces with a new ovidne fab echis ocellatus snake bite antivenom in nigeria: randomized comparative trial with institutute pasteur serum (ipser) africa antivenom. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997; 56:291-300.
    25) Moran NF, Newman WJ, & Theakston RDG: High incidence of early anaphylactoid reaction to SAIMR polyvalent snake antivenom. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92:69-70.
    26) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    27) Nowak RM & Macias CG : Anaphylaxis on the other front line: perspectives from the emergency department. Am J Med 2014; 127(1 Suppl):S34-S44.
    28) Nuchpraryoon I & Garner P: Interventions for preventing reactions to snake antivenom. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2000(2):1.
    29) Otero R, Gutierrez JM, & Nunez V: A randomized double-blind clinical trial of two antivenoms in patients bitten by bothrops atrox in Colombia. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med & Hyg 1996; 90:696-700.
    30) Otero-Patino R, Cardoso JLC, & Higashi HG: A randomized, blinded, comparative trial of one pepsin-digested and two whole IgG antivenoms for bothrops snake bites in uraba, colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58:183-189.
    31) Product Information: CroFab(R) intravenous injection, crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) intravenous injection. BTG International Inc. (per manufacturer), West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
    32) Product Information: diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution, diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    33) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic version. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    34) Seifert SA, Boyer LV, & Dart RC: Relationship of venom effects to venom antigen and antivenom serum concentrations in a patient with crotalus atrox envenomation treated with a fab antivenom. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30:49-53.
    35) Singh A, Biswal N, & Nalini P: Acute pulmonary edema as a complication of anti-snake venom therapy. Indian J Ped 2001; 68:81-82.
    36) Tanen DA, Ruha AM, & Graeme KA: Epidemiology and hospital course of rattlesnake envenomations cared for at a tertiary referral center in central arizona. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8:177-182.
    37) Theakston RDG: An objective approach to antivenom therapy and assessment of first-aid measures in snake bite. Ann Trop Med & Parasitol 1997; 91:857-865.
    38) Toxinology Department, Women & Children's Hospital: CSL Antivenom Handbook: CSL Taipan Antivenom. The University of Adelaide Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_taipan.html. As accessed 2012-12-18.
    39) Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital: CSL antivenom handbook: CSL Black Snake antivenom. Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2001a. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_black.html. As accessed 2012-05-08.
    40) Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital: CSL antivenom handbook: CSL Tiger Snake antivenom. Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2001b. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_tiger.html. As accessed 2012-05-08.
    41) Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital: CSL antivenom handbook: CSL brown snake antivenom. Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_brown.html#use. As accessed 2012-02-16.
    42) Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_deathader.html. Toxinology Department, Women's & Children's Hospital. Adelaide, Australia. 2011. Available from URL: http://www.toxinology.com/generic_static_files/cslavh_antivenom_deathader.html. As accessed 2012-10-10.
    43) Trevett AJ, Lalloo DG, & Nwokolo NC: Venom detection kits in the management of snakebite in central province, Papua, New Guinea. Toxicon 1995; 33:703-705.
    44) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    45) Visser LE, Kyei-Faried S, Belcher DW, et al: Failure of a new antivenom to treat echis ocellatus snake bite in rural Ghana: the importance of quality surveillance. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008; 102(5):445-450.
    46) Warrell DA: Clinical toxicology of snake bite in asia, in Meier J & White J (eds): Handbook of Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, pp 493-594.
    47) Weber RA & White RR: Crotalidae envenomation in children. Ann Plastic Surg 1993; 31:141-145.
    48) White J: Clinical toxicology of snakebite in australia and new guinea, in Meier J & White J (eds): Handbook of Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, pp 595-618.
    49) White J: Envenoming and antivenom use in Australia. Toxicon 1998; 36(11):1483-1492.
    50) Williams DJ, Jensen SD, Nimorakiotakis B, et al: Antivenom use, premedication and early adverse reactions in the management of snake bites in rural Papua New Guinea. Toxicon 2007; 49(6):780-792.
    51) de Silva HA, Pathmeswaran A, Ranasinha CD, et al: Low-dose adrenaline, promethazine, and hydrocortisone in the prevention of acute adverse reactions to antivenom following snakebite: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med 2011; 8(5):e1000435.