MOBILE VIEW  | 

ANTIDEPRESSANTS, DIBENZOXAZEPINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Dibenzoxazepine compounds are structurally related to the tricyclic antidepressants.

Specific Substances

    A) AMOXAPINE
    1) CL-67772
    2) 2-Chloro-11-(piperazin-1-yl)dibenz [1,4]oxazepine
    3) Molecular Formula: C17-H16-Cl-N3-O
    4) CAS 14028-44-5
    LOXAPINE (Synonym)
    1) CL-62362
    2) Oxilapine
    3) SUM-3170
    4) 2-Chloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenz
    5) [1,4]oxazepine
    6) Molecular Formula: C18-H18-Cl-N3-O
    7) CAS 1977-10-2
    LOXAPINE SUCCINATE
    1) CL-71563
    2) Molecular Formula: C18-H18-Cl-N3-O,C4-H6-O4
    3) CAS 27833-64-3
    4) DIBENZOXAZEPINE ANTIDEPRESSANT

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) AMOXAPINE is available as 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg tablets (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    2) LOXAPINE SUCCINATE is available as 5 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg capsules (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    B) USES
    1) Amoxapine is used to treat different types of depression (eg, neurotic or reactive depressive disorders, endogenous and psychotic depression) (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    2) Loxapine is used to treat patients with schizophrenia (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    3) Dibenzoxazepine is also the main component of CR gas, a lacrimating agent used for crowd control (Beswick, 1983). Refer to "LACRIMATORS" document for information on CR gas.

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Dibenzoxazepine derivatives include amoxapine and loxapine. Amoxapine is used to treat different types of depression (eg, neurotic or reactive depressive disorders, endogenous and psychotic depression). Loxapine is used to treat patients with schizophrenia. Dibenzoxazepine is also the main component of CR gas, a lacrimating agent used for crowd control. Refer to "LACRIMATORS" document for information on CR gas.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Amoxapine is an antidepressant with mild sedative property and an unknown mechanism of action. It reduces norepinephrine and serotonin uptake and inhibits the response of dopamine receptors to dopamine. It is not an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. Although the exact mechanism of action of loxapine has not been completely established, loxapine is thought to improve psychotic conditions by blocking dopamine at postsynaptic receptor sites in the brain.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In overdose, anticholinergic and antihistamine effects cause CNS depression. Increased norepinephrine in the brain can lead to seizure activity. Dopaminergic blockade leads to extrapyramidal symptoms including tardive dyskinesia, delirium, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Amoxapine and loxapine use and therefore overdose has decreased in the last 20 years use with the advent of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and atypical antipsychotics. However, severe toxicity and deaths have been reported.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) AMOXAPINE: COMMON (up to 14%): Drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, and blurred vision. INFREQUENT: Nausea, anxiety, insomnia, restlessness, nervousness, palpitations, tremors, confusion, excitement, ataxia, dizziness, headache, fatigue, weakness, increased perspiration, edema, skin rash, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    2) LOXAPINE: COMMON: Extrapyramidal effects, akathisia, dystonia (eg, spasm of the neck muscles, tightness of the throat, swallowing difficulty, dyspnea, and/or protrusion of the tongue), parkinsonian-like symptoms (eg, tremor, rigidity, excessive salivation, and masked facies), tardive dyskinesia. INFREQUENT: Nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, drowsiness, dizziness, faintness, weakness, insomnia, agitation, tension, seizures, akinesia, slurred speech, numbness, confusion, tachycardia, hypotension, hypertension, lightheadedness, dermatitis, rash, neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: These agents can cause tachycardia, mild anticholinergic effects, and mild CNS depression.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: CNS depression and recurrent, prolonged seizures predominate. Complications of status epilepticus such as profound metabolic acidosis, respiratory failure, hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis with subsequent acute renal failure may develop if seizures are not rapidly controlled. Hypotension also develops with severe overdose. Dysrhythmias are not a predominant feature, but may develop in patients with severe acidosis or protracted seizures. Supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, premature ventricular contractions, nonspecific ST segment and T wave changes, QRS prolongation, bradycardia, and myocardial failure have been reported. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome has also been reported in a patient following amoxapine overdose.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Respiratory depression may occur rapidly. Tachycardia is common. Hyperthermia may occur in patients with prolonged seizures. Hypotension occurs in severe overdose.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of amoxapine or loxapine use in pregnant women; however, third-trimester antipsychotic drug exposure has been associated with extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms in neonates. Tricyclic antidepressants cross the placental barrier, but are not believed to be teratogens. Amoxapine and loxapine have been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Animal studies indicate amoxapine and loxapine are not teratogenic, but may cause embryotoxicity (intrauterine death, decreased birth weight, decreased postnatal survival, fetal resorptions, hydronephrosis with hydroureter, delayed ossification, and/or distended renal pelvis with reduced or absent papillae). Amoxapine is excreted in human breast milk, and loxapine and its metabolites have been found in the milk of lactating dogs.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, arterial blood gases, and CPK in patients with seizure or severe CNS depression.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    D) Serum drug concentrations are generally not useful in acute management.
    E) In general, cyclic antidepressant concentrations greater than 1000 ng/mL are associated with coma, seizures, and dysrhythmias. However, significant and life-threatening toxicity may occur at serum concentrations less than 1000 ng/mL.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Care is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Seizure should be treated aggressively with benzodiazepines. Seizures refractory to benzodiazepines should be treated with phenobarbital or propofol. If the above measures fail, treat with neuromuscular paralysis with continuous EEG monitoring. QRS widening should be treated with sodium bicarbonate and intubation/hyperventilation to achieve blood pH of 7.45 to 7.55. Early intubation is advised in any patient with CNS depression, seizures, QRS prolongation or ventricular dysrhythmia. Treat hyperthermia with control of seizures and external cooling measures. Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids, control of seizures and correction of severe acidosis. if hypotension persists, use vasopressors; norepinephrine is generally preferred to dopamine.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Gastrointestinal decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for abrupt onset of seizures and subsequent aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Activated charcoal and orogastric lavage may be of benefit even several hours after ingestion, due to the anticholinergic effects of these drugs in overdose. However, because of the potential for seizure and CNS depression, endotracheal intubation for airway protection should be strongly considered prior to decontamination.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Early intubation is advised in any patient with CNS depression, seizures, QRS prolongation or ventricular dysrhythmia.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) Hemodialysis is not effective in the removal of antidepressants from the body due to the high protein binding and large volume of drug distribution.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Inadvertent pediatric ingestions should be evaluated in a healthcare facility given the risk of seizures. Asymptomatic inadvertent ingestion of up to a double therapeutic dose in adults may be observed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Any pediatric ingestion, any adult ingesting more than a double a therapeutic dose, and any patient with a deliberate ingestion should be referred to a healthcare facility. Patients should received activated charcoal and be monitored for 6 hours. If asymptomatic after 6 hours, with normal vital signs and ECG, patients may be discharged or cleared for psychiatric evaluation as appropriate.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with CNS depression should be admitted and monitored for potential seizure activity. Patients should be admitted to an intensive care unit.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any patient with severe toxicity. Consult a neurologist for patients with status epilepticus and those requiring continuous EEG monitoring.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Failure to protect airway prior to decontamination. Failure to recognize high epileptogenic potential of these drugs. Failure to aggressively control seizures.
    I) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) AMOXAPINE: Bioavailability: 95% to 100%; Cmax: about 90 minutes after ingestion. Protein binding: approximately 90%. Hepatic metabolism with renal elimination of metabolites. Half-life: 8 hours. LOXAPINE: Cmax: about 1 hour after ingestion. Extensive hepatic metabolism. Half-life: 4 hours.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) In overdose, absorption and elimination may be prolonged due to an anticholinergic effect.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Other tricyclic antidepressant, anticholinergic toxicity, sympathomimetic toxicity, withdrawal from ethanol or benzodiazepine, atypical antipsychotic.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICOLOGY: Fatal poisonings have occurred in children following the ingestion of as little as 250 mg of amoxapine. Fatalities have been reported in adults after ingestions of 2 to 5 grams of amoxapine.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSES: ADULTS: AMOXAPINE: 50 to 600 mg daily in divided doses. LOXAPINE: 10 mg orally twice daily up to 100 mg/day; MAX: 250 mg/day. CHILDREN: Safety and efficacy of amoxapine and loxapine have not been established in pediatric patients.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Dibenzoxazepine derivatives include amoxapine and loxapine. Amoxapine is used to treat different types of depression (eg, neurotic or reactive depressive disorders, endogenous and psychotic depression). Loxapine is used to treat patients with schizophrenia. Dibenzoxazepine is also the main component of CR gas, a lacrimating agent used for crowd control. Refer to "LACRIMATORS" document for information on CR gas.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Amoxapine is an antidepressant with mild sedative property and an unknown mechanism of action. It reduces norepinephrine and serotonin uptake and inhibits the response of dopamine receptors to dopamine. It is not an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. Although the exact mechanism of action of loxapine has not been completely established, loxapine is thought to improve psychotic conditions by blocking dopamine at postsynaptic receptor sites in the brain.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In overdose, anticholinergic and antihistamine effects cause CNS depression. Increased norepinephrine in the brain can lead to seizure activity. Dopaminergic blockade leads to extrapyramidal symptoms including tardive dyskinesia, delirium, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Amoxapine and loxapine use and therefore overdose has decreased in the last 20 years use with the advent of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and atypical antipsychotics. However, severe toxicity and deaths have been reported.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) AMOXAPINE: COMMON (up to 14%): Drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, and blurred vision. INFREQUENT: Nausea, anxiety, insomnia, restlessness, nervousness, palpitations, tremors, confusion, excitement, ataxia, dizziness, headache, fatigue, weakness, increased perspiration, edema, skin rash, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    2) LOXAPINE: COMMON: Extrapyramidal effects, akathisia, dystonia (eg, spasm of the neck muscles, tightness of the throat, swallowing difficulty, dyspnea, and/or protrusion of the tongue), parkinsonian-like symptoms (eg, tremor, rigidity, excessive salivation, and masked facies), tardive dyskinesia. INFREQUENT: Nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, drowsiness, dizziness, faintness, weakness, insomnia, agitation, tension, seizures, akinesia, slurred speech, numbness, confusion, tachycardia, hypotension, hypertension, lightheadedness, dermatitis, rash, neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: These agents can cause tachycardia, mild anticholinergic effects, and mild CNS depression.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: CNS depression and recurrent, prolonged seizures predominate. Complications of status epilepticus such as profound metabolic acidosis, respiratory failure, hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis with subsequent acute renal failure may develop if seizures are not rapidly controlled. Hypotension also develops with severe overdose. Dysrhythmias are not a predominant feature, but may develop in patients with severe acidosis or protracted seizures. Supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, premature ventricular contractions, nonspecific ST segment and T wave changes, QRS prolongation, bradycardia, and myocardial failure have been reported. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome has also been reported in a patient following amoxapine overdose.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Respiratory depression may occur rapidly. Tachycardia is common. Hyperthermia may occur in patients with prolonged seizures. Hypotension occurs in severe overdose.
    3.3.2) RESPIRATIONS
    A) Respiratory depression may occur rapidly after overdose.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, drug fever was reported in less than 1% of patients receiving amoxapine therapy (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hyperthermia is common in patients with prolonged seizures; temperatures as high as 42.2 degrees C have been reported (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Browne et al, 1982; Goldberg & Spector, 1982; Peterson, 1981; Merigian et al, 1995).
    2) LOXAPINE: Hypothermia has been reported but is unusual (Peterson, 1981).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypotension may be seen in severe overdose. Hypertension may be seen initially, probably secondary to decreased norepinephrine reuptake. Early hypertension suggests drug effect and may be followed by significant hypotension (Peterson, 1981).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) AMOXAPINE: Tachycardia is common (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Kulig et al, 1982).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, one of the most common adverse reactions was blurred vision reported in 7% of patients (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    B) AMOXAPINE: Pupils may be dilated but usually respond to light; blurred vision may occur secondary to loss of accommodation reflexes (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Goldberg & Spector, 1982).
    C) AMOXAPINE: Miosis has been reported, usually in patients with seizures or CNS depression (Kulig et al, 1982; Miles et al, 1990).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) AMOXAPINE: Dry mouth may occur as an anticholinergic effect (Goldberg & Spector, 1982).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) LOXAPINE: Hypotension has rarely been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Hypotension occurs with severe overdose (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Wedin et al, 1986).
    b) INCIDENCE: Hypotension occurred in 3 of 23 (13%) patients with amoxapine overdoses in one study (Wedin et al, 1986) and 7 of 33 (21%) patients in another study (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    B) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) LOXAPINE: Hypertension has rarely been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Mild hypertension may develop early in the course of overdose. Hypertension may be an early indicator of drug effect and may be followed by hypotension and CNS toxicity (Peterson, 1981).
    C) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Life threatening dysrhythmias are not a prominent feature of dibenzoxazepine overdose. Sinus tachycardia is common. Supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, premature ventricular contractions, and nonspecific ST and T wave changes, QRS prolongation, QT prolongation, bradycardia, electromechanical dissociation and myocardial failure have been reported, usually in patients with severe neurologic toxicity.
    b) Premature ventricular contractions, premature atrial contractions, bradycardia, electromechanical dissociation, junctional rhythm, and AV dissociation have been reported but are not common. Most patients with significant dysrhythmias have had severe CNS toxicity.
    c) CASE SERIES: One case series reports that patients with amoxapine overdose had an incidence of dysrhythmias similar to that seen with traditional tricyclic antidepressant overdose (2 of 23 patients (8%)) (Wedin et al, 1986). The type and severity of dysrhythmias that occurred were not reported.
    d) CASE REPORT: Following ingestion of 5 grams of amoxapine, a 42-year-old developed sinus tachycardia that progressed to a junctional rhythm 3 hours after admission, then became a junctional rhythm with ventricular escape beats 1 hour later, followed by AV dissociation with multiple wide QRS complexes 3 hours after that, and ended with wide sine wave forms 9 hours after admission. The patient's status epilepticus did not respond to treatment with diazepam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, or thiopental. The patient was not paralyzed or given general anesthesia. The patient sustained a cardiac arrest when seizures finally stopped and was unable to be resuscitated (Genser & Marcus, 1987).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old woman developed sinus tachycardia, prolonged QTc (520 milliseconds), seizures, CNS depression, and agitation requiring neuromuscular paralysis for control after ingesting 2 grams of amoxapine and 500 milligrams of hydrochlorothiazide. Thirty hours after admission her QRS interval widened to 104 milliseconds and the QTc shortened to 470 milliseconds; there were no associated arrhythmias and electrolytes were normal. Thirty- three hours after admission she developed hypotension while being repositioned, followed by bradycardia and electromechanical dissociation from which she could not be resuscitated (Munger & Effron, 1988).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old man developed two episodes of atrial flutter, each lasting approximately 15 minutes, after ingesting 140 milligrams of loxapine and 600 milligrams of fluoxetine. He was otherwise asymptomatic except for mild lethargy (Roberge & Martin, 1994).
    D) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, the incidence of tachycardia was less than 1% in patients who received amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009). Tachycardia, which was not dose-related, has been reported during amoxapine therapy (Charalampous, 1972; Jue et al, 1982).
    b) LOXAPINE: Tachycardia has rarely been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT: An 85-year-old man with diabetes developed atrial flutter two days after beginning amoxapine 75 milligrams/day (Zavodnick, 1981).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Sinus tachycardia is common; paroxysmal atrial tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia have been reported (Shigemura et al, 2001; Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Peterson, 1981; Wedin et al, 1986; Merigian et al, 1995).
    b) INCIDENCE: Supraventricular tachycardia developed in 13 of 33 (39%) patients with amoxapine overdose in one study and 8 of 23 patients in another (Wedin et al, 1986).
    E) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild QRS and QT prolongation and right bundle branch block have been reported, but are not common (Peterson, 1981; Munger & Effron, 1988; Bock et al, 1982).
    b) CASE SERIES: In a series of 91 cases of amoxapine overdose reported to the manufacturer, no patient developed primary cardiac toxicity or a QRS interval greater than 100 milliseconds (Bishop & Kiltie, 1983).
    F) HEART FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 74-year-old woman with no history of cardiac disease developed confusion, sinus tachycardia, hypotension, and pulmonary edema following amoxapine overdose. On the third hospital day she developed atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response (120 to 170) and ventricular extrasystoles. By the fifth day hypotension resolved, she converted to sinus rhythm and only slight pulmonary congestion was noted (Sorensen, 1988).
    G) EDEMA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Edema has been reported following therapeutic use of amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Respiratory depression may occur rapidly after overdose (Shigemura et al, 2001; Mazzola et al, 2000; Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    b) AMOXAPINE: INCIDENCE: Respiratory depression developed in 7 of 33 patients (21%) with amoxapine overdose in one study (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    B) PNEUMONITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Aspiration pneumonitis may develop in patients with CNS depression or seizures (Thompson & Dempsey, 1983; Nosko et al, 1988).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Myocardial failure and pulmonary edema developed in a 74-year- old woman after amoxapine overdose (Sorensen, 1988).
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman developed status epilepticus after ingesting approximately 9.6 grams of amoxapine, 220 milligrams of fluphenazine, and 4.5 grams of diphenhydramine. Her clinical course was complicated by hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, ARDS and sepsis (Merigian et al, 1995).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, one of the most common adverse reactions was drowsiness reported in 14% of patients treated with amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) AMOXAPINE: Anxiety, insomnia, restlessness, nervousness, palpitations, tremors, confusion, excitement, ataxia, dizziness, headache, fatigue, and weakness have been reported following therapeutic use of amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    c) LOXAPINE: Extrapyramidal effects, akathisia, dystonia (eg, spasm of the neck muscles, tightness of the throat, swallowing difficulty, dyspnea, and/or protrusion of the tongue), parkinsonian-like symptoms (eg, tremor, rigidity, excessive salivation, and masked facies), tardive dyskinesia, drowsiness, dizziness, faintness, staggering gait, shuffling gait, muscle twitching, weakness, insomnia, agitation, tension, seizures, akinesia, slurred speech, numbness, lightheadedness, and confusion have been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CNS depression is common and may develop abruptly. Mild overdoses result in drowsiness, lethargy, dizziness, hallucinations, and confusion. Severe overdose may result in coma and seizures (Mazzola et al, 2000; Peterson, 1981; Kulig et al, 1982; Miles et al, 1990; Hepler et al, 1982).
    b) AMOXAPINE: INCIDENCE: Drowsiness, lethargy, or mild CNS depression developed in 7 of 23 patients (30%) with amoxapine overdose in one study (Wedin et al, 1986) and 16 of 33 patients (49%) in another (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983). Coma developed in 2 of 23 patients (9%) with amoxapine overdose in one study (Wedin et al, 1986) and 8 of 33 (24%) in another (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    c) DURATION: Most patients regain consciousness within 24 to 48 hours (Peterson, 1981; Kulig et al, 1982; Miles et al, 1990). Patients with prolonged seizures may require weeks or months to regain a normal level of consciousness (Thompson & Dempsey, 1983; Miller et al, 1990)
    d) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Deep coma with selective brainstem impairment (loss of oculocephalic, oculovestibular and pupillary light reflexes) was described in an amoxapine overdose (Nosko et al, 1988).
    e) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old woman developed lethargy and delirium with auditory and visual hallucinations lasting 24 hours after ingesting 750 milligrams of amoxapine and 225 milligrams of phenelzine (Weaver, 1985).
    f) LOXAPINE: CASE SERIES - In a series of 10 patients with loxapine overdose, 4 patients developed lethargy and agitation, 3 became stuporous with response to pain only, and 3 became comatose and unresponsive to pain (Peterson, 1981). All patients regained consciousness within 24 hours of admission.
    g) LOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: After ingesting an unknown amount of loxapine succinate (50-mg capsules), a 20-month-old child developed agitation, unsteady gait, which progressed to lethargy, pinpoint pupils, decreased muscle tone, decreased deep tendon reflexes, and truncal ataxia. In addition, she developed extrapyramidal symptoms (oculogyric movement, involuntary movement of the lower extremities). She was discharged following supportive therapy (Hepler et al, 1982).
    B) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Seizure has been reported in less than 1% of patients receiving amoxapine therapy in controlled trials in the United States (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) LOXAPINE: Seizures has been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    c) LOXAPINE: Three cases of generalized tonic-clonic seizures have been reported secondary to loxapine when given in doses of 10 to 146 mg daily in patients with destructive behavior. One patient developed status epilepticus (Varga & Simpson, 1971).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures are common, may develop abruptly, and may be extremely difficult to control. Prolonged uncontrolled seizures may result in permanent brain damage, hyperthermia, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, myoglobinuria and acute tubular necrosis (Shigemura et al, 2001; Mazzola et al, 2000; Merigian et al, 1995; Wedin et al, 1986; Rogol et al, 1984; Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    b) INCIDENCE: Seizures developed in 5 of 23 (22%) patients after amoxapine overdose in one study (Wedin et al, 1986) and 12 of 33 patients (36%) in another (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983). Seizures developed in 6 of 10 patients (60%) after loxapine overdose in one series (Peterson, 1981).
    c) DURATION: Repetitive isolated seizures are common. Sustained status epilepticus has been reported, lasting as long as 9 hours (Rogol et al, 1984; Shepard, 1983; Smith, 1982; Miller et al, 1990; Ereshefsky, 1983; Litovitz & Troutman, 1983; Merigian et al, 1995).
    d) THERAPEUTIC DOSES: Seizures have been reported in patients without a history of seizure disorder taking therapeutic doses of amoxapine (Jefferson, 1984; Koval et al, 1982; Giannini & Price, 1984).
    e) PEDIATRIC: Children may experience seizures with amoxapine overdose (Miles et al, 1990).
    f) CASE REPORTS/AMOXAPINE
    1) Status epilepticus, with resultant metabolic acidosis, associated with cerebral anoxia and cerebral dysfunction were reported in a 24-year-old female following acute amoxapine overdose (Browne et al, 1982).
    2) Seizures, coma, and metabolic acidosis that almost completely resolved in 10 hours with no noticeable sequelae, were reported in a 36-year-old woman who presented with an initial amoxapine level of 3230 ng/mL (Bock et al, 1982).
    3) Tonic-clonic seizures were reported in a 24-year-old man after taking 7000 mg of amoxapine in a suicide attempt. In addition, he experienced rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure hyperglycemia, sinus tachycardia, and severe acidosis. He recovered following continuous hemofiltration without any sequelae (Shigemura et al, 2001).
    g) CASE SERIES/LOXAPINE: Loxapine overdose complicated by multiple seizures, rhabdomyolysis, and acute renal failure has been reported (Delabranche et al, 2002; Tam et al, 1980; Peterson, 1981).
    C) NEUROPATHY
    1) Permanent neurologic injury has been reported in patients with prolonged seizures.
    2) CASE REPORTS/AMOXAPINE
    a) A 24-year-old woman developed status epileptics lasting 8 hours despite anticonvulsant therapy after ingesting 4 grams of amoxapine. Three months later she was able to speak in short phrases, with dysarthria, had poor judgment, severe memory deficits, and could not be cared for outside of an institution (Goldberg & Spector, 1982).
    b) A 24-year-old woman developed 10 hours of status epilepticus despite anticonvulsant therapy after ingesting 3.9 grams of amoxapine. She regained consciousness 21 days post ingestion and 206 days after ingestion was severely ataxic, had severe memory deficits, dysarthria, amnesia, and was not oriented to place or time (Browne et al, 1982).
    D) NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome has been reported in patients receiving antipsychotic drugs, including amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) LOXAPINE: Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome has been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    c) LOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome occurred in a 41-year-old schizophrenic woman treated with loxapine 75 mg twice daily and flupenthixol decanoate 350 mg weekly. Two previous cases of NMS due to loxapine had been reported (Chong & Abbott, 1991).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Neuroleptic malignant syndrome has been reported with both amoxapine and loxapine (Shigemura et al, 2001; Mazzola et al, 2000; Chong & Abbott, 1991a; Madakasira, 1989; Taylor & Schwartz, 1988; Blue et al, 1986).
    b) CASE REPORTS/AMOXAPINE
    1) Bradykinesia and rigidity followed by fever, leukocytosis, and greatly elevated CPK was reported in a 62-year-old woman treated with amoxapine 200 milligrams/day and benztropine 5 milligrams/day (Madakasira, 1989).
    2) Neuroleptic malignant syndrome developed in a 37-year-old woman after ingesting 875 milligrams of amoxapine and unknown amounts of triazolam and alprazolam. The patient also received haloperidol (13 milligrams over 48 hours) during hospitalization to control agitation (Taylor & Schwartz, 1988).
    c) CASE REPORTS/LOXAPINE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome developed in a 41-year-old woman treated with loxapine 150 milligrams/day and flupenthixol 350 milligrams/week (Chong & Abbott, 1991a), a 51-year-old woman treated with loxapine 50 milligrams/day and fluphenazine decanoate 50 milligrams/month (Blue et al, 1986), and a 42-year-old receiving loxapine 325 milligram/day, amantadine 300 milligrams/day, fluoxetine 20 milligrams/day and lorazepam 3 milligrams/day (Goeke et al, 1991).
    E) EXTRAPYRAMIDAL DISEASE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Extrapyramidal symptoms, including tardive dyskinesia, have been reported in less than 1% of patients receiving amoxapine therapy in controlled studies in the United States (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) LOXAPINE: Extrapyramidal effects, akathisia, dystonia (eg, spasm of the neck muscles, tightness of the throat, swallowing difficulty, dyspnea, and/or protrusion of the tongue), parkinsonian-like symptoms (eg, tremor, rigidity, excessive salivation, and masked facies), and tardive dyskinesia have been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonic reactions, tardive dyskinesia, choreoathetosis, cogwheel rigidity, tardive myoclonus, and lingual dyskinesia have been described in patients treated with loxapine and amoxapine (Mazzola et al, 2000; Little & Jankovic, 1987; Ereshefsky, 1983; Lapierre & Anderson, 1983; Madakasira, 1989; Gaffney & Tune, 1985).
    b) CASE REPORT/LOXAPINE: After ingesting an unknown amount of loxapine succinate (50-mg capsules), a 20-month-old child developed agitation, unsteady gait, which progressed to lethargy, pinpoint pupils, decreased muscle tone, decreased deep tendon reflexes, and truncal ataxia. In addition, she developed extrapyramidal symptoms (oculogyric movement, involuntary movement of the lower extremities). She was discharged following supportive therapy (Hepler et al, 1982).
    F) TREMOR
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Tremor has been reported with amoxapine therapy (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Amoxapine 200 to 300 mg/day was given to a 79-year-old woman for 8 months to treat her depressive state. Amoxapine treatment was discontinued and restarted in 1 month following a relapse of her depression. One month after reinitiating therapy, a right hand tremor developed. The amoxapine was discontinued and the tremor disappeared but panic attacks began. These panic attacks were successfully treated with alprazolam. Her depression increased and amoxapine was reinitiated and the tremor reappeared. After 3 months of treatment, sucking and chewing movements began, and the amoxapine was discontinued. The tremor improved after starting phenelzine 15 mg twice a day, but the sucking and chewing persisted. Treatment with phenelzine 15 mg twice a day for the next 5 months controlled her apparently reversible tardive dyskinesia features completely (Thornton & Stahl, 1984).
    G) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: A 14-year-old boy developed seizures lasting less than 30 minutes, rhabdomyolysis and renal failure after ingesting 1.9 grams of amoxapine. Six days later he developed agitation, confusion, incoherent speech, hyperthermia, transient cogwheel rigidity and flat affect and hypertension to 220/120. MRI showed increased intensity bilaterally in the parieto-occipital lobes. Symptoms resolved in one week and the MRI changes resolved in 2 months (Mancias et al, 1995).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) LOXAPINE: Nausea and vomiting have been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, one of the most common adverse reactions was constipation reported in 12% of patients who received amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    C) PANCREATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Pancreatitis was described in a 26-year-old woman after an overdose of amoxapine and procyclidine (Jeffries & Masson, 1985).
    D) APTYALISM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: In controlled clinical trials, one of the most common adverse reactions was dry mouth reported in 14% of patients who received amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) LOXAPINE: Dry mouth has been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010; Mazzola et al, 2000).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC HEPATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Amoxapine-induced cytolytic hepatitis was reported in a 29-year-old woman following therapy with amoxapine 100 mg per day for 18 days. The patient was also receiving benzodiazepine and meprobamate therapy. Elevated liver enzymes were observed, with AST peaking at 311 U/L and ALT peaking at 838 U/L. Histologic biopsy revealed cytolytic hepatic lesions. After discontinuation of loxapine and the benzodiazepine, liver function returned to normal 6 weeks later (Manapany et al, 1993).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Acute renal failure has been reported after overdose. Most patients have had documented repetitive seizures, myoglobinuria or rhabdomyolysis (Shigemura et al, 2001; Merigian et al, 1995; Pumariega et al, 1982; Chu et al, 1984; Frendin & Swainson, 1985; Abreo et al, 1982; Thompson & Dempsey, 1983; Tam et al, 1980).
    b) CASE SERIES: Reversible renal failure developed in 2 of 10 patients (20%) after loxapine overdose; both had multiple seizures, rhabdomyolysis, and myoglobinuria (Peterson, 1981).
    c) CASE SERIES: Of 111 cases of amoxapine overdose reported to the manufacturer, 12 developed acute renal failure (11%) (Jennings et al, 1983). Presumptive or definitive evidence of myoglobinuria or rhabdomyolysis was observed in 8 of these patients. Seizures were documented in 7 of the patients.
    d) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man presented 10 hours after ingestion of 2 to 3 grams of loxapine with anuria and renal insufficiency (creatinine 185 micromol/L, urea 7 mmol/L) and mild rhabdomyolysis (CK 501 IU/L). He did not develop seizures until 18 hours after ingestion. Peak CK was 12600 IU/L 88 hours after ingestion and he received two hemodialysis sessions 50 and 74 hours after ingestion for anuric renal failure, and was discharged 12 days later without sequelae. Since this patient presented with anuria and renal failure prior to the onset of seizures or severe rhabdomyolysis and without ever developing hypotension, the authors suggested that loxapine may exert a direct nephrotoxic effect, independent of hypotension, dehydration or rhabdomyolysis (Delabranche et al, 2002).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Profound lactic acidosis with blood pH below 7.0 has been reported in patients with repetitive seizures (Shigemura et al, 2001; Merigian et al, 1995; Miller et al, 1990; Cooper et al, 1985).
    b) AMOXAPINE: Hypoventilation may worsen acidemia in patients with status epilepticus (Browne et al, 1982; Goldberg & Spector, 1982; Shepard, 1983).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BLOOD COAGULATION PATHWAY FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORTS: Coagulopathy developed in 2 patients with amoxapine overdose, one of whom developed profuse hemorrhage. Both had repetitive seizures and one developed hyperthermia to 42.2 degrees C (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    B) AGRANULOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: In controlled studies of amoxapine, the incidence of agranulocytosis was less than 1% (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    b) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Agranulocytosis was reported in a 42-year-old woman after administration of amoxapine 50 mg daily for 10 weeks for a severe panic disorder, complicated by depression. After withdrawal of amoxapine, the patient's hospital course continued to deteriorate for 47 days. The agranulocytosis was complicated by septicemia and possibly endocarditis and other complications. This makes it difficult to definitely attribute the reaction to amoxapine (Christenson, 1983).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Agranulocytosis occurred in a 35-year-old woman after taking 18 grams of amoxapine over 57 days. Transient thrombocytosis (platelet count 999,000/mm3) developed during recovery (Sedlacek et al, 1986).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Skin rashes and itching have been reported with amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009; Charalampous, 1972; Ota et al, 1972).
    b) LOXAPINE: Dermatitis and rash have been reported in patients receiving loxapine (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    B) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Increased perspiration has been reported following therapeutic use of amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Rhabdomyolysis, which may induce acute tubular necrosis, is common in patients with prolonged seizures or coma (Shigemura et al, 2001; Merigian et al, 1995; Tam et al, 1980; Abreo et al, 1982; Frendin & Swainson, 1985; Chu et al, 1984).
    b) LOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man presented 10 hours after ingestion of 2 to 3 grams of loxapine with anuria and renal insufficiency (creatinine 185 micromol/L, urea 7 mmol/L) and mild rhabdomyolysis (CK 501 IU/L). He had a single brief seizure 18 hours after ingestion. Peak CK was 12600 IU/L 88 hours after ingestion and he received two hemodialysis sessions 50 and 74 hours after ingestion for anuric renal failure, and was discharged 12 days later without sequelae. Since this patient presented with anuria and renal failre prior to the onset of seizures or severe rhabdomyolysis and without ever developing hypotension, the authors suggested that loxapine may exert a direct nephrotoxic effect, independent of hypotension, dehydration or rhabdomyolysis (Delabranche et al, 2002).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Hyperglycemia has been reported in a 24-year-old man after taking 7000 mg of amoxapine in a suicide attempt. In addition, he experienced rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure tonic-clonic seizures, sinus tachycardia, and severe acidosis. He recovered following continuous hemofiltration without any sequelae (Shigemura et al, 2001).
    b) LOXAPINE: CASE REPORT: Nonketotic hyperglycemia (blood glucose 942 milligrams/deciliter) developed in a 49-year-old woman taking loxapine 150 milligrams/day and lithium 1500 milligrams/day. Hyperglycemia resolved with discontinuation of loxapine but recurred when she began taking amoxapine (Tollefson & Lesar, 1983).
    B) LACTATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) AMOXAPINE: Galactorrhea has been reported in patients taking therapeutic doses of amoxapine (Gelenberg et al, 1979; Jaffe & Zisook, 1978; Cooper et al, 1981).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of amoxapine or loxapine use in pregnant women; however, third-trimester antipsychotic drug exposure has been associated with extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms in neonates. Tricyclic antidepressants cross the placental barrier, but are not believed to be teratogens. Amoxapine and loxapine have been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Animal studies indicate amoxapine and loxapine are not teratogenic, but may cause embryotoxicity (intrauterine death, decreased birth weight, decreased postnatal survival, fetal resorptions, hydronephrosis with hydroureter, delayed ossification, and/or distended renal pelvis with reduced or absent papillae). Amoxapine is excreted in human breast milk, and loxapine and its metabolites have been found in the milk of lactating dogs.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Tricyclic antidepressants cross the placental barrier, but are not believed to be teratogens. No specific information on teratogenic effects of loxapine or amoxapine in humans could be found at the time of this review.
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) AMOXAPINE
    1) Embryotoxicity was seen in rats and rabbits given oral amoxapine doses approximating the human dose (200 to 300 mg/day), and intrauterine death, stillbirth, and decreased birth weight were noted with oral doses that were 3 to 10 times the human dose. Postnatal survival between days 0 to 4 was decreased in the offspring of rats that were given 5 to 10 times the human dose of amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a).
    b) LOXAPINE
    1) Animal studies indicated embryofetal toxicity that included increased fetal resorptions, reduced weights, and hydronephrosis with hydroureter, when rats were given oral loxapine 1 mg/kg/day (equivalent to maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 10 mg/day on mg/m(2) basis) during organogenesis. Increased prenatal death, decreased postnatal survival, reduced fetal weights, delayed ossification, and/or distended renal pelvis with reduced or absent papillae were observed in the offspring of rats that received oral loxapine 0.6 mg/kg or higher (approximately 0.5-fold the MRHD of 10 mg/day on mg/m(2) basis) from midpregnancy through weaning (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012).
    2) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) AMOXAPINE
    1) No evidence of teratogenic effects due to amoxapine were noted in mice, rats, and rabbits (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a).
    b) LOXAPINE
    1) There was no evidence of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity in pregnant rats, dogs, or rabbits administered loxapine at doses up to 2 times the maximum recommended human dose of 10 mg twice daily (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) EXTRAPYRAMIDAL AND/OR WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS
    1) Maternal use of antipsychotic drugs during the third trimester of pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of neonatal extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms (eg, agitation, hypertonia, hypotonia, tremor, somnolence, respiratory distress, and feeding disorders) following delivery. The severity of these adverse effects has ranged from cases that are self-limiting to cases that required prolonged periods of hospitalization and ICU care (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012; Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    B) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) AMOXAPINE has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a).
    2) LOXAPINE has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) AMOXAPINE
    1) Embryotoxicity was seen in rats and rabbits given oral amoxapine doses approximating the human dose (200 to 300 mg/day), and intrauterine death, stillbirth, and decreased birth weight were noted with oral doses that were 3 to 10 times the human dose. Postnatal survival between days 0 to 4 was decreased in the offspring of rats that were given 5 to 10 times the human dose of amoxapine (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a).
    b) LOXAPINE
    1) Animal studies indicated embryofetal toxicity that included increased fetal resorptions, reduced weights, and hydronephrosis with hydroureter, when rats were given oral loxapine 1 mg/kg/day (equivalent to maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 10 mg/day on mg/m(2) basis) during organogenesis. Increased prenatal death, decreased postnatal survival, reduced fetal weights, delayed ossification, and/or distended renal pelvis with reduced or absent papillae were observed in the offspring of rats that received oral loxapine 0.6 mg/kg or higher (approximately 0.5-fold the MRHD of 10 mg/day on mg/m(2) basis) from midpregnancy through weaning (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012).
    2) Perinatal studies have shown renal papillary abnormalities in the offspring of rats treated from midpregnancy with loxapine doses of 0.6 and 1.8 mg/kg (approximately equal to the usual human dose of 10 mg twice daily) (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    2) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) LOXAPINE
    1) There was no evidence of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity in pregnant rats, dogs, or rabbits administered loxapine at doses up to 2 times the maximum recommended human dose of 10 mg twice daily (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) AMOXAPINE
    a) Amoxapine is excreted in human breast milk (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a; Gelenberg et al, 1979; Briggs et al, 1998), and approximates 25% of maternal serum concentrations. It is not known whether these concentrations are enough to affect the infant.
    b) The American Academy of Pediatrics classifies the effects of amoxapine in nursing infants as unknown, but of potential concern (Anon, 2001; Briggs et al, 1998).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) LOXAPINE
    a) Loxapine and its metabolites have been found in the milk of lactating dogs (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012; Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) AMOXAPINE
    a) Male rats had a slight decrease in the number of fertile matings after receiving oral amoxapine doses that were 5 to 10 times the human dose. Female rats displayed a reversible increase in estrous cycle length after receiving oral doses within the therapeutic range (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009a).
    2) LOXAPINE
    a) No effects on fertility or early embryonic development were noted when oral loxapine was given to male rats or male and female rabbits. Female rats were in persistent diestrus, an expected pharmacologic effect, which caused decreased mating at doses that approximated 0.2- and 1-fold the maximum recommended human dose of 10 mg/day (based on mg/m(2)) (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, arterial blood gases, and CPK in patients with seizure or severe CNS depression.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    D) Serum drug concentrations are generally not useful in acute management.
    E) In general, cyclic antidepressant concentrations greater than 1000 ng/mL are associated with coma, seizures, and dysrhythmias. However, significant and life-threatening toxicity may occur at serum concentrations less than 1000 ng/mL.

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Obtain a chest X-ray in patients at risk for acute lung injury or aspiration (patients with seizures, persistent hypotension, or sustained dysrhythmias).

Methods

    A) OTHER
    1) Many laboratories can qualitatively detect the presence of cyclic antidepressants in the urine or gastric contents; however, this procedure will not differentiate between therapeutic and toxic amounts.
    2) Determination of plasma cyclic antidepressant levels is not available at all hospitals and is rarely available on a stat basis. Serum levels do not correlate well with the clinical severity of toxicity; therefore serum levels are not likely to be a factor in the initial assessment of the severity of the overdose.
    B) IMMUNOASSAY
    1) Amoxapine and loxapine are not detected by some assays used to qualitatively detect tricyclic antidepressants including Abbott's ADx(TM) and Syva's ETS(TM) systems (Meenan et al, 1990).
    C) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) HPLC methods for quantification of amoxapine and loxapine and their metabolites have been described (Cheung et al, 1991; Selinger et al, 1989; Kobayashi et al, 1985).
    2) Mass spectrometry (MS), gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) or electron capture detection after derivatization may be used to measure loxapine levels in biological samples (Mazzola et al, 2000).
    3) Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used to confirm loxapine ingestion in a 20-month-old child. To characterize TLC spots and obtain loxapine concentration in blood, GC was used (Hepler et al, 1982).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with CNS depression should be admitted and monitored for potential seizure activity. Patients should be admitted to an intensive care unit.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Inadvertent pediatric ingestions should be evaluated in a healthcare facility given the risk of seizures. Asymptomatic inadvertent ingestion of up to a double therapeutic dose in adults may be observed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any patient with severe toxicity. Consult a neurologist for patients with status epilepticus and those requiring continuous EEG monitoring.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any pediatric ingestion, any adult ingesting more than a double a therapeutic dose, and any patient with a deliberate ingestion should be referred to a healthcare facility. Patients should received activated charcoal and be monitored for 6 hours. If asymptomatic after 6 hours, with normal vital signs and ECG, patients may be discharged or cleared for psychiatric evaluation as appropriate.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, arterial blood gases, and CPK in patients with seizure or severe CNS depression.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    D) Serum drug concentrations are generally not useful in acute management.
    E) In general, cyclic antidepressant concentrations greater than 1000 ng/mL are associated with coma, seizures, and dysrhythmias. However, significant and life-threatening toxicity may occur at serum concentrations less than 1000 ng/mL.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Gastrointestinal decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for abrupt onset of seizures and subsequent aspiration.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Activated charcoal and orogastric lavage may be of benefit even several hours after ingestion, due to the anticholinergic effects of these drugs in overdose. However, because of the potential for seizure and CNS depression, endotracheal intubation for airway protection should be strongly considered prior to decontamination.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    2) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    3) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    4) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Care is symptomatic and supportive.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY: Seizure should be treated aggressively with benzodiazepines. Seizures refractory to benzodiazepines should be treated with phenobarbital or propofol. If the above measures fail, treat with neuromuscular paralysis with continuous EEG monitoring. QRS widening should be treated with sodium bicarbonate and intubation/hyperventilation to achieve blood pH of 7.45 to 7.55. Early intubation is advised in any patient with CNS depression, seizures, QRS prolongation or ventricular dysrhythmia. Treat hyperthermia with control of seizures and external cooling measures. Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids, control of seizures and correction of severe acidosis. if hypotension persists, use vasopressors; norepinephrine is generally preferred to dopamine.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, arterial blood gases, and CPK in patients with seizure or severe CNS depression.
    3) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    4) Serum drug concentrations are generally not useful in acute management.
    5) In general, cyclic antidepressant concentrations greater than 1000 ng/mL are associated with coma, seizures, and dysrhythmias. However, significant and life-threatening toxicity may occur at serum concentrations less than 1000 ng/mL.
    C) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures in the setting of TCA overdose have been associated with abrupt deterioration of hemodynamic status (Ellison & Pentel, 1989) and should be aggressively controlled. Because of animal studies showing increased duration and frequency in ventricular tachycardia following the use of phenytoin in the setting of amitriptyline overdose (Callaham et al, 1988), phenobarbital is preferable to phenytoin in treating seizures refractory to benzodiazepines.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    3) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    4) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    5) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    6) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    7) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    8) RECURRING SEIZURES
    a) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents:
    1) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    2) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
    b) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised.
    c) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003).
    9) PROPOFOL
    a) A 30-year-old woman developed status epilepticus unresponsive to 15 milligrams of diazepam, 20 milligrams of lorazepam and one gram of phenytoin after ingesting 9.6 grams of amoxapine, 220 milligrams of fluphenazine and 4.5 grams of diphenhydramine. Seizures stopped after she received propofol 2.5 milligrams/kilogram bolus followed by an infusion of 0.2 milligram/kilogram/minute (Merigian et al, 1995).
    D) WIDE QRS COMPLEX
    1) SUMMARY: Conduction defects and dysrhythmias are not common with amoxapine and loxapine overdoses. Recommended therapy is based on treatment of traditional tricyclic antidepressant overdoses. Serum alkalinization using intravenous boluses of sodium bicarbonate and intubation/hyperventilation is the treatment of choice.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) SUMMARY: Sodium bicarbonate administration appears to have a beneficial effect on TCA-induced conduction defects and dysrhythmias in humans and in animal models (Nattel et al, 1984; Nattel & Mittleman, 1984; Hedges et al, 1985; Hoffman et al, 1993). Animal studies and in vitro studies have suggested that this effect may be secondary to increased pH (Brown et al, 1973; Brown, 1976; Nattel & Mittleman, 1984), increased concentration of sodium ion (Pentel & Benowitz, 1984; Hoffman et al, 1993; McCabe et al, 1993), or both (Sasyniuk et al, 1986).
    1) Serum alkalinization to a pH of 7.45 to 7.55 should be achieved using intravenous boluses of sodium bicarbonate and intubation/hyperventilation as necessary. Simultaneous hyperventilation and bicarbonate administration may result in profound alkalemia (Wrenn et al, 1992) and should only be done with extreme caution and careful monitoring of pH.
    b) MECHANICAL HYPERVENTILATION: Induction of respiratory alkalosis by mechanical hyperventilation may be as effective as intravenous sodium bicarbonate. A pH greater than 7.60 or a pCO2 less than 20 mmHg is probably undesirable (Bessen et al, 1983; Bessen & Niemann, 1985-86).
    1) CASE REPORTS: Several case reports describe reversal of dysrhythmias and improvement in conduction delay in patients with severe TCA overdose treated with hyperventilation (Kingston, 1979; Bessen et al, 1983; Bessen & Niemann, 1985-86).
    2) ANIMAL DATA: In a dog model of amitriptyline overdose, treatment with either hyperventilation or sodium bicarbonate reduced dysrhythmias and conduction slowing, while infusion of isotonic or hypertonic sodium chloride did not (Nattel & Mittleman, 1984).
    3) IN VITRO: Alkalinization therapy may work by affecting plasma protein binding of tricyclics (Brown et al, 1973; Levitt et al, 1986).
    c) SODIUM BICARBONATE DOSE: 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram as needed to achieve a physiologic pH or slightly above (7.45 to 7.55) (Nattel et al, 1984). In some cases alkalinization of blood to a pH above physiologic may be necessary to reverse dysrhythmias (Sasyniuk et al, 1986).
    1) CASE REPORTS: Several case reports describe reversal of dysrhythmias and improvement in hemodynamic status in patients with severe TCA overdose treated with sodium bicarbonate (Hoffman & McElroy, 1981; Molloy et al, 1984).
    2) ANIMAL DATA: Hyperventilation, which increased arterial pH to above 7.50, did not cause QRS narrowing in a rat model of desipramine overdose. Injection of 3 to 6 milliequivalents/kilogram of NaCl or high doses of sodium bicarbonate (3 milliequivalents/kilogram) reduced cardiac toxicity in acidotic and normal animals. The beneficial effects of NaHCO3 may therefore be due to its sodium content, not in its ability to change pH (Pentel & Benowitz, 1984).
    E) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) Ventricular dysrhythmias (multifocal PVCs, ventricular tachycardia, flutter and fibrillation) may respond to serum alkalinization therapy to pH 7.45 to 7.55 by intravenous boluses of sodium bicarbonate and intubation/hyperventilation. Dysrhythmias unresponsive to this therapy may respond to lidocaine.
    2) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Quinidine, disopyramide, and procainamide are contraindicated as their effects on myocardial conduction are similar to that of the tricyclic antidepressants.
    3) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    F) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) If alkalinization and volume repletion are ineffective in reversing hypotension, consider the use of pressor or inotropic agents (Frommer et al, 1987). Hemodynamic interventions may be guided by right-sided heart catheterization (Frommer et al, 1987).
    b) Dopamine and norepinephrine are the most commonly used agents. Animal data support the use of either agent (Vernon et al, 1991).
    c) Intra-aortic balloons have been used successfully when pressors have failed (Frommer et al, 1987).
    d) SUMMARY
    1) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    e) DOPAMINE
    1) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    2) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    f) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    2) DOSE
    a) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    b) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) While there are reports of patients whose TCA-induced shock was refractory to dopamine, but not to other agents (Heath et al, 1984; Teba et al, 1988; Hagerman & Hanashiro, 1981), most patients respond adequately to dopamine. Animal studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the efficacy of dopamine for TCA-induced hypotension; dosages used and varying experimental conditions limit the usefulness of these studies.
    b) ANIMALS
    1) Vernon et al (1991), using a dog amitriptyline model, found that dosing with dopamine 30 micrograms/kilogram/minute or with norepinephrine 0.25 microgram/kilogram/minute significantly improved cardiac output, heart rate, peak left ventricular pressure change, mean arterial pressure, and mixed venous oxygen saturation. They concluded that both norepinephrine and dopamine were efficacious in this study (Vernon et al, 1991).
    2) Studies performed on a cat model of TCA toxicity showed minimal or even deleterious effects of dopamine (10 to 40 micrograms/kilogram/minute) and dobutamine (Jackson & Banner, 1981).
    3) Follmer & Lum (1982) refuted this finding; in a cat model, they compared several agents and found that dopamine (20 microgram/kilogram/minute) was superior to norepinephrine (0.2 to 0.4 microgram/kilogram/minute) in reversing hypotension and in preventing death (Follmer & Lum, 1982).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) Hypotension may be a result of antidepressant-induced depletion of norepinephrine due to inhibition of neuronal uptake. Theoretically, norepinephrine and phenylephrine may be more effective agents due to their alpha-stimulating effects (Frommer et al, 1987).
    b) Norepinephrine, in doses of 15 and 30 micrograms/minute for 5 and 24 hours respectively, was successful in reversing circulatory shock refractory to dopamine in two adults with tricyclic antidepressant overdose (Teba et al, 1988).
    c) Disadvantages of using norepinephrine include the need for continuous nursing supervision, a central venous line, and the tissue damage caused by extravasation.
    G) SUPRAVENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) TACHYCARDIA SUMMARY
    a) Evaluate patient to be sure that tachycardia is not a physiologic response to dehydration, anemia, hypotension, fever, sepsis, or hypoxia. Sinus tachycardia does not generally require treatment unless hemodynamic compromise develops.
    b) If therapy is required, a short acting, cardioselective agent such as esmolol is generally preferred (Prod Info BREVIBLOC(TM) intravenous injection, 2012).
    c) ESMOLOL/ADULT LOADING DOSE
    1) Infuse 500 micrograms/kilogram (0.5 mg/kg) IV over 1 minute (Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) ESMOLOL/ADULT MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Follow loading dose with infusion of 50 mcg/kg per minute (0.05 mg/kg per minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) EVALUATION OF RESPONSE: If response is inadequate, infuse second loading bolus of 0.5 mg/kg over 1 minute and increase the maintenance infusion to 100 mcg/kg (0.1 mg/kg) per minute. Reevaluate therapeutic effect, increase in the same manner if required to a maximum infusion rate of 300 mcg/kg (0.3 mg/kg) per minute (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) The manufacturer recommends that a maximum of 3 loading doses be used (Prod Info BREVIBLOC(TM) intravenous injection, 2012).
    4) END POINT OF THERAPY: As the desired heart rate or blood pressure is approached, omit loading dose and adjust maintenance infusion as required (Prod Info BREVIBLOC(TM) intravenous injection, 2012).
    e) CAUTION
    1) Esmolol is a short acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent with negative inotropic effects. Esmolol should be avoided in patients with asthma, obstructive airway disease, decompensated heart failure and pre-excited atrial fibrillation (wide complex irregular tachycardia) or atrial flutter (Neumar et al, 2010).
    H) PHYSOSTIGMINE
    1) Use of physostigmine in the setting of tricyclic antidepressant overdose has been associated with the development of seizures and fatal dysrhythmias. It is NOT recommended
    I) FLUMAZENIL
    1) CONTRAINDICATED: Flumazenil is NOT INDICATED even if benzodiazepines are known coingestants; use of flumazenil in the setting of tricyclic antidepressant overdose has been associated with the onset of seizures and ventricular dysrhythmias (Burr et al, 1989; Marchant et al, 1989; Mordel et al, 1992; Geller et al, 1991).
    2) ANIMAL STUDY: Dogs treated with flumazenil 0.2 milligram/kilogram after intoxication with amitriptyline and midazolam or amitriptyline alone developed worsening dysrhythmias whereas intoxicated dogs treated with normal saline did not (Lheureux et al, 1992). Two of the dogs treated with flumazenil died compared with none in the saline treated groups.
    J) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    2) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    3) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    4) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    5) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).
    K) ACIDOSIS
    1) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS: Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with sodium bicarbonate, 1 to 2 mEq/kg is a reasonable starting dose(Kraut & Madias, 2010). Monitor serum electrolytes and arterial or venous blood gases to guide further therapy.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Diuresis and hemodialysis are unlikely to be of benefit due to the high protein binding and large volume of drug distribution. Use of hemoperfusion for treatment of loxapine or amoxapine overdose has not been reported; hemoperfusion would not be expected to remove a significant percentage of ingested dose due to the large volume of drug distribution.
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis is not effective in the removal of antidepressants from the body due to the high protein binding and large volume of drug distribution.
    2) Although the quantitative amount of drug removed from the body is small (less than 1 to 3 percent of total body burden), clinical improvement has been reported following hemodialysis in patients that have rapid clinical deterioration accompanied by life-threatening hemodynamic and neurological complications following massive tricyclic overdose (Comstock et al, 1983; Heath et al, 1982).
    3) CASE REPORT: After the ingestion of 2 to 3 grams of loxapine, a 35-year-old man developed acute anuric renal failure without hypotension. In addition, he developed a generalized seizure and severe rhabdomyolysis. He required two 4-hours hemodialyses; the hemodialysis clearance during the first hemodialysis was 15.8 mL/min and only 501 mcg of loxapine were removed. At 10 and 89 hours postingestion, loxapine plasma levels were 374 mcg/L and 86 mcg/L, respectively (Delabranche et al, 2002).
    C) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Hemoperfusion would not be expected to remove a significant percentage of ingested dose due to the large volume of drug distribution.

Case Reports

    A) ACUTE EFFECTS
    1) INFANT
    a) AMOXAPINE: A 15-month-old male infant developed status seizures and hyperthermia, without cardiovascular toxicity after ingesting an estimated 250 mg of amoxapine. Seizures were refractory to phenobarbital, diazepam, phenytoin, naloxone, physostigmine, and paraldehyde. Seizure activity was eventually controlled eight hours after onset. Despite supportive care the child remained unresponsive to painful stimuli and died 144 hours after amoxapine ingestion. The serum amoxapine level was reported as 896 ng/mL with 68 mg/mL of 8-hydroxyamoxapine (Shepard, 1983).
    2) ADULT
    a) AMOXAPINE: Acute renal failure secondary to amoxapine overdose (at least 4 g; 60 mg/kg) was reported in a 17-year-old girl. Serum creatinine was 2.1 mg%, BUN 13 mg% and potassium 3.3 mEq/L nine hours post-admission. Creatinine increased to 2.3 and then 3.9 mg% and BUN rose to 18 mg% on the second day. Urine output decreased to 15 to 20 mL/hr despite administration of furosemide. BUN and creatinine continued to increase and responded to intensive diuresis with furosemide. Urine myoglobin levels remained normal throughout hospitalization (Pumariega et al, 1982).
    b) AMOXAPINE: Acute renal failure, hyperuricemia, elevated CPK, and generalized seizures occurred in a 24-year-old male after ingestion of 4 grams of amoxapine. The patient responded initially to physostigmine 1.5 mg IV, then relapsed into coma. The patient recovered following a prolonged stuporous state (Thompson & Dempsey, 1983).
    c) AMOXAPINE: A 24-year-old white female ingested 3.9 grams of amoxapine and 2 cans of beer. The patient lacked the anticholinergic and cardiotoxic effects associated with tricyclic antidepressant toxicity, but instead developed a serious neurotoxic reaction manifested by intractable seizures, coma, and acidosis (Browne et al, 1982).
    d) AMOXAPINE: A 31-year-old woman who reportedly ingested 2 grams of amoxapine was found semiconscious with a tonic convulsion. On arrival miosis and bibasilar rales were present, indicating possible aspiration. The initial amoxapine level was 1400 ng/mL. Thirty hours after admission the QRS duration was 104 ms with no evidence of ectopy or arrhythmias. Three hours later sudden hypotension and bradycardia, unresponsive to therapy, occurred during repositioning and the patient died one hour later. It was unclear whether the cardiac effects were related to amoxapine cardiotoxicity, or due to endotracheal tube dislodgement and hypoxia during repositioning (Munger & Effron, 1988).
    e) AMOXAPINE: A 40-year-old woman ingested an unknown amount of amoxapine with no other known coingestants. Repeated generalized seizures were followed by brainstem coma and absence of spontaneous respirations, corneal, or deep tendon reflexes. An ECG showed normal sinus rhythm, and aspiration pneumonia was present. Corneal reflexes returned 24 hours postingestion and were accompanied by upper limb myoclonus. Oculocephalic and oculovestibular reflexes returned in 36 to 48 hours. The patient recovered fully, with no apparent neurological sequelae (Nosko et al, 1988).

Summary

    A) TOXICOLOGY: Fatal poisonings have occurred in children following the ingestion of as little as 250 mg of amoxapine. Fatalities have been reported in adults after ingestions of 2 to 5 grams of amoxapine.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSES: ADULTS: AMOXAPINE: 50 to 600 mg daily in divided doses. LOXAPINE: 10 mg orally twice daily up to 100 mg/day; MAX: 250 mg/day. CHILDREN: Safety and efficacy of amoxapine and loxapine have not been established in pediatric patients.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) AMOXAPINE: 50 mg orally 2 or 3 times daily up to 600 mg daily in divided doses (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).
    B) LOXAPINE:
    1) ORAL: Initially, 10 mg orally twice daily; increase to maintenance of 60 to 100 mg/day; MAXIMUM: 250 mg/day (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2011).
    2) ORAL INHALATION: 10 mg by oral inhalation, administered by a healthcare professional only; limit of 10 mg/24 hours (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012)
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) The safety and efficacy of amoxapine and loxapine have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, 2012; Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2011; Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) CHILDREN: Fatal poisonings have occurred in children following the ingestion of as little as 250 milligrams of amoxapine (Linakis, 1988; Manoguerra, 1982).
    2) ADULTS: Fatalities have been reported after as little as 2 grams (Munger & Effron, 1988) and 5 grams (Genser & Marcus, 1987) of amoxapine in adults (Linakis, 1988).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old woman was found dead after an apparent suicide attempt with approximately 75 loxapine capsules (50-mg each). Postmortem blood concentrations of loxapine was 9.5 mg/L (Mazzola et al, 2000).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) PEDIATRIC
    1) An 8-year-old boy was accidentally given 375 mg loxapine instead of 15 mg loxapine. The child was given activated charcoal within 30 minutes. The patient developed episodes of drowsiness over the next 4 hours. Cardiovascular monitoring showed the heart rate not exceeding 101 bpm and the lowest blood pressure reading at 97/54 mmHg. The patient was discharged 20 hours postingestion (Tarricone, 1998).
    2) CASE REPORT/LOXAPINE: After ingesting an unknown amount of loxapine succinate (50-mg capsules), a 20-month-old child developed agitation, unsteady gait, which progressed to lethargy, pinpoint pupils, decreased muscle tone, decreased deep tendon reflexes, and truncal ataxia. In addition, she developed extrapyramidal symptoms (oculogyric movement, involuntary movement of the lower extremities). A loxapine concentration of 0.072 mg/dL was reported. She was discharged following supportive therapy (Hepler et al, 1982).
    B) ADULTS
    1) After the ingestion of 2 to 3 grams of loxapine, a 35-year-old man developed acute anuric renal failure without hypotension. In addition, he developed a generalized seizure and severe rhabdomyolysis. He required two 4-hours hemodialyses and was released 12 days later without sequelae. At 10 and 89 hours postingestion, loxapine plasma levels were 374 mcg/L and 86 mcg/L, respectively (Delabranche et al, 2002).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old man developed rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure after taking 7000 mg of amoxapine in a suicide attempt. In addition, he experienced tonic-clonic seizures, sinus tachycardia, severe acidosis and hyperglycemia. He recovered following continuous hemofiltration. Blood concentration of amoxapine was not obtained (Shigemura et al, 2001).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) GENERAL
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Usual therapeutic serum concentrations are 10 to 210 nanograms/milliliter.
    2) Serious toxicity has been reported with levels of 648 to 2509 nanograms/milliliter.
    3) Fatalities have been reported with levels of 261 to 7160 nanograms/milliliter.
    2) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    a) THERAPEUTIC LEVELS
    1) Usual therapeutic serum concentrations are 10 to 210 nanograms/milliliter (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    b) TOXIC LEVELS
    1) Serious toxicity with eventual recovery has been reported with amoxapine levels of 1820 to 2114 nanograms/milliliter (Kulig et al, 1982)
    2) Severe CNS toxicity with permanent neurologic deficits has been reported with levels of 648 to 2509 nanograms/milliliter (Goldberg & Spector, 1982).
    3) ACUTE
    a) FATALITIES/POSTMORTEM
    1) AMOXAPINE: Four deaths have been reported following intentional overdoses with amoxapine. The amoxapine blood levels were 261, 1300, 3042, and 6700 nanograms/milliliter. Usual therapeutic serum concentrations are 10 to 210 nanograms/milliliter (Litovitz & Troutman, 1983).
    a) In other published cases of fatality associated with amoxapine overdose the serum amoxapine concentrations have ranged from 1500 to 7160 nanograms/milliliter (Winek et al, 1984; Munger & Effron, 1988).
    2) LOXAPINE: In several fatality cases, postmortem blood concentrations of loxapine have ranged from 1.20 to 7.70 mg/L (Mazzola et al, 2000).
    a) CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old female was found dead after an apparent suicide attempt with approximately 75 loxapine capsules (50-mg each). Postmortem blood concentrations of loxapine was 9.5 mg/L (Mazzola et al, 2000).
    b) The respective levels of loxapine and amoxapine were as follows (Mazzola et al, 2000):
    1) Heart blood: 9.5 and 0.6 mg/L
    2) Bile: 28.8 and 4.7 mg/L
    3) Gastric: 278 mg/L and negative
    4) Vitreous: 1.5 mg/L and negative

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Amoxapine is an antidepressant with mild sedative property and an unknown mechanism of action. It reduces norepinephrine and serotonin uptake and inhibits the response of dopamine receptors to dopamine. It is not an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (Prod Info amoxapine oral tablets, 2009). Although the exact mechanism of action of loxapine has not been completely established, loxapine is thought to improve psychotic conditions by blocking dopamine at postsynaptic receptor sites in the brain (Prod Info loxapine oral capsules, 2010).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Cyclic antidepressants are structurally similar to the phenothiazines with similar anticholinergic, adrenergic, and alpha-blocking properties of the phenothiazines.
    B) Following absorption, these agents are extensively bound to plasma proteins and also bind to tissue and cellular sites, including the mitochondria (Frommer et al, 1987).
    C) Cyclic antidepressants block the neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine.
    1) Golden et al (1988) found that 6-hydroxymelatonin excretion increased following antidepressant treatment, and whole-body norepinephrine turnover was reduced.
    D) Therapeutic doses initially may cause drowsiness and difficulty concentrating and thinking; dulling of depressive ideation may explain the efficacy of these agents in depressive disorders. Hallucinations, excitement, and confusion have occurred in a small percentage of patients during antidepressant therapy.
    E) These agents also appear to have a slight alpha-adrenergic blocking effect. Cyclic antidepressants are very lipophilic and significantly bound to proteins; (the blood tissue ratio varies from 1:10 to 1:30) which explains the ineffectiveness of forced diuresis and dialysis techniques in removal of the drug (Frommer et al, 1987).
    F) It has been postulated that tricyclics exert their cardiovascular toxicity via a non-specific membrane-stabilizing effect, similar to other drugs such as dextropropoxyphene, chlorpromazine, and the beta-blockers (Henry & Cassidy, 1986).
    G) Loxapine has been shown to have structural and functional similarities, such as serotonin receptor 5-HT2 and dopamine D1, D2, and D4 binding characteristics, to the atypical antipsychotic agents, such as clozapine. (Singh et al, 1996; Glazer, 1999).

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Abreo K, Shelp WD, & Kosseff A: Amoxapine-associated rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure:case report. J Clin Psychiatry 1982; 43:426-427.
    3) Anon: American academy of pediatrics committee on drugs: transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 2001; 108(3):776-789.
    4) Bessen HA & Niemann JT: Improvement of cardiac conduction after hyperventilation in tricyclic antidepressant overdose. J Toxicol 1985-86; 23:537-546.
    5) Bessen HA, Niemann JT, & Haskell RJ: Effect of respiratory alkalosis in tricyclic antidepressnat overdose. West J Med 1983; 139:373-376.
    6) Beswick FW: Chemical agents used in riot control and warfare. Hum Toxicol 1983; 2:254-256.
    7) Bishop MP & Kiltie H: Neurotoxicity with amoxapine overdose: a more reasonable perspective. Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy 1983; 17:131-132.
    8) Blue MG, Schneider SM, & Noro S: Successful treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome with sodium nitroprusside. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:56-57.
    9) Bock JL, Cummings KC, & Jatlow PI: Amoxapine overdose: a case report. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139:1619-1620.
    10) Briggs GG, Freeman RK, & Yaffe SJ: Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation. 5th ed, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1998.
    11) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    12) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    13) Brown TCK, Barker GA, & Dunlop ME: Anesth Intes Care 1973; 1:203-210.
    14) Brown TCK: Tricyclic antidepressant overdosage: experimental studies on the management of circulatory complications. Clin Toxicol 1976; 9:255-272.
    15) Browne JL, Tsuang MT, & Perry PJ: Amoxapine neurotoxicity: a case report with long-term follow-up. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1982; 16:404-407.
    16) Burr W, Sandham P, & Judd A: Death after flumazenil. Br Med J 1989; 298:1713.
    17) Cailleux N, Marie I, & Noblet C: Pseudopheochromocytome induit par l'amoxapine a propos d'une observation. Rev Med Interne 1998; 19:139-141.
    18) Callaham M, Schamaker H, & Pentel P: Phenytoin prophylaxis of cardiotoxicity in experimental amitriptyline poisoning. Pharmacol Exp There 1988; 245:216-220.
    19) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    20) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    21) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    22) Charalampous KD: Amoxapine: a clinical evaluation in depressive syndromes. Curr Ther Res 1972; 14:657-663.
    23) Cheung SW, Tang SW, & Remington G: Simultaneous quantitation of loxapine, amoxapine and their 7-and 80hydroxy metabolites in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatography 1991; 564:213-221.
    24) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    25) Chong LS & Abbott PM: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome secodary to loxapine. Br J Psych 1991; 159:572-573.
    26) Chong LS & Abbott PM: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome secondary to loxapine. Br J Psychiatry 1991a; 159:572-573.
    27) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    28) Christenson BC: Agranulocytosis associated with amoxapine. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:921-922.
    29) Chu CC, Wadle CV, & Ruedrich SL: Acute renal failure associated with amoxapine overdose. Nebraska Med J 1984; 69:338-339.
    30) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    31) Comstock TJ, Watson WA, & Jennison TA: Severe amitriptyline intoxication and the use of charcoal hemoperfusion. Clin Pharm 1983; 2:85-88.
    32) Cooper DS, Gelenberg AJ, & Wojcik JC: The effect of amoxapine and imipramine on serum prolactin levels. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:1023-1025.
    33) Cooper GJS, Kletchko S, & Tebbutt K: Amoxapine overdosage and primary lactic acidosis (letter). N Z Med J 1985; 98:608-609.
    34) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    35) DeVane CL: Cyclic antidepressants. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ et al (eds): Applied pharmacokinetics. Principles of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2nd ed, Applied Therapeutics, Inc, Spokane, WA, 1986, pp 852-907.
    36) Delabranche X, Le Gourrier L, & Faye A: Does loxapine have a direct nephrotoxic effect? a case report (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(3):333-334.
    37) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    38) Ellison DW & Pentel PR: Clinical features and consequences of seizures due to cyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7(1):5-10.
    39) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    40) Ereshefsky L: Toxicities of amoxapine. Clinical Pharmacy 1983; 2:104-108.
    41) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    42) Follmer CH & Lum BKB: Protective action of diazepam and sympathomimetic amines against amitriptyline-induced toxicity. J Pharmacol Exp There 1982; 222:424.
    43) Frendin TJ & Swainson CP: Acute renal failure secondary to non-traumatic rhabdomyolysis following amoxapine overdose. N Z Med J 1985; 98:690-691.
    44) Frommer DA, Kulig KW, Marx JA, et al: Tricyclic antidepressant overdose. JAMA 1987; 257(4):521-526.
    45) Gaffney GR & Tune LE: Serum neuroleptic levels and extrapyramidal side effects in patients treated with amoxapine. J Clin Psychiatry 1985; 46:428-429.
    46) Gallant DM: Antidepressant overdose: symptoms and treatment. Psychopathology 1987; 20:75-81.
    47) Gelenberg AJ, Cooper DS, & Doller JC: Galactorrhea and hyperprolactinemia associated with amoxapine therapy. JAMA 1979; 242:1900-1901.
    48) Geller E, Crome P, & Schaller MD: Risks and benefits of therapy with flumazenil (Anexate) in mixed drug intoxications. Eur Neurol 1991; 31:241-250.
    49) Genser AS & Marcus SM: Progressive cardiac conduction defects due to amoxapine overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1987; 29:481.
    50) Giannini AJ & Price WA: Amoxapine-induced seizures: case reports. J Clin Psychiatry 1984; 45:358-359.
    51) Glazer WM: Does loxapine have "atypical" properties? clinical evidence. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60:42-46.
    52) Goeke JE, Hagan DS, & Goelzer SL: Lethal catatonia complicated by the development of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a middle-aged female. Critical Care Med 1991; 19:1445-1448.
    53) Gojer JAC: Possible manic side effects of loxapine (letter). Can J Psychiatry 1992; 37:669-670.
    54) Goldberg MJ & Spector R: Amoxapine overdose: report of two patients with severe neurologic damage. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96:463-464.
    55) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    56) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    57) Hagerman GA & Hanashiro PK: Reversal of tricyclic-antidepressant-induced cardiac conduction abnormalities by phenytoin. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:82-86.
    58) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    59) Heath A, Marin P, & Sjostrand I: Inotropic effect of prenalterol in amitriptyline poisoning. Int Care Med 1984; 10:209.
    60) Heath A, Wickstrom I, & Martenson E: Treatment of antidepressant poisoning with resin hemoperfusion. Human Toxicol 1982; 1:361-371.
    61) Hedges JR, Baker PB, & Tasset JJ: Bicarbonate therapy for the cardiovascular toxicity of amitriptyline in an animal model. J Emerg Med 1985; 3:253-260.
    62) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    63) Henry JA & Cassidy SL: Membrane stabilizing activity: a major cause of fatal poisoning. Lancet 1986; 1:1414-1417.
    64) Hepler BR, Solano R, & Weber JR: Acute loxapine intoxication in a child. J Anal Toxicol 1982; 6(5):258-259.
    65) Hoffman JR & McElroy CR: Bicarbonate therapy for hypotension in tricyclic antidepressant overdose. West J Med 1981; 134:60-64.
    66) Hoffman JR, Votey SR, & Bayer M: Effect of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate inthe treatment of moderate-to-severe cyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1993; 11:336-341.
    67) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    68) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    69) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    70) Jackson JE & Banner W: Tricyclic antidepressant overdose: cardiovascular responses to catecholamines (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1981; 23(Suppl 1):59.
    71) Jaffe K & Zisook S: Galactorrhea in a patient treated with amoxapine. J Clin Psychiatry 1978; 39:821.
    72) Jefferson JW: Convulsions associated with amoxapine (letter). JAMA 1984; 251:603.
    73) Jeffries JJ & Masson J: Pancreatitis following overdose with amoxapine and procyclidine. Can J Psychiatr 1985; 30:546-547.
    74) Jennings AE, Levey AD, & Harrington JT: Amoxapine-associated acute renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:1525-1527.
    75) Jue SG, Dawson GW, & Brogden RN: Amoxapine: a review of its pharmacology and efficacy in depressed states. Drugs 1982; 24:1-23.
    76) Kingston ME: Hyperventilation in tricyclic antidepressant poisoning. Crit Care Med 1979; 7:550-551.
    77) Kinney JL & Evans RL Jr: Evaluation of amoxapine. Clin Pharm 1982; 1:417-424.
    78) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    79) Kobayashi A, Sugita S, & Nakazawa K: Determination of amoxapine and its metabolites in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography. Neuropharmacology 1985; 24:1253-1256.
    80) Koval G, VanNuis C, & Davis TD: Seizures associated with amoxapine (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139:845.
    81) Kraut JA & Madias NE: Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6(5):274-285.
    82) Kulig K, Rumack BH, & Sullivan JB: Amoxapine overdose: coma and seizures without cardiotoxic effects. JAMA 1982; 248:1092-1094.
    83) Lapierre YD & Anderson K: Dyskinesia associated with amoxapine antidepressant therapy: a case report. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:493-494.
    84) Levitt MA, Sullivan JB, & Owens SM: Amitriptyline plasma protein binding: effect of plasma pH and relevance to clinical overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1986; 4:121-125.
    85) Lheureux P, Vranckx M, & Leduc D: Flumazenil in mixed benzodiazepine/tricyclic antidepressant overdose: a placebo-controlled study in the dog. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:184-138.
    86) Linakis JG: Amoxapine. Clin Tox Rev 1988; 10.
    87) Litovitz TL & Troutman WG: Amoxapine overdose. Seizures and fatalities. JAMA 1983; 250:1069-1071.
    88) Little JT & Jankovic J: Case report: tardive myoclonus. Movement Disorders 1987; 2:307-311.
    89) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    90) Madakasira S: Amoxapine-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome. DICP 1989; 23:50-55.
    91) Manapany M, Marchetti B, & Bertrand-Lepensec D: Hepatite cytolitique aigue a loxapine. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993; 17:405-406.
    92) Mancias P, Kramer L, & Butler IJ: Amoxapine overdose in a young man: a transient mitochondrial abnormality?. Pharmacotherapy 1995; 15:528-532.
    93) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    94) Manoguerra AS: Tricyclic antidepressants. Crit Care Quarterly 1982; 43-51.
    95) Marchant B, Wray R, & Leach A: Flumazenil causing convulsions and ventricular tachycardia. Br Med J 1989; 299:860.
    96) Mazzola CD, Miron S, & Jenkins AJ: Loxapine intoxication: case report and literature review. J Anal Toxicol 2000; 24:638-641.
    97) McCabe JL, Cobaugh DJ, & Menegazzi JJ: A comparison of hyperventilation in severe tricyclic antidepressant overdose in swine. Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:367.
    98) Meenan GM, Barlotta S, & Lehrer M: Urinary tricyclic antidepressant screening: comparison of results obtained with Abbott FPIA reagents and Syva EIA reagents. J Analyt Toxicol 1990; 14:273-276.
    99) Merigian KS, Browning BG, & Leeper KV: Successful treatment of amoxapine-induced refractory status epilepticus with propofol (Diprivan). Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2:128-133.
    100) Miles MV, Greenwood RS, & Hussey B: Diagnostic pitfalls associated with amoxapine overdose: a case report. Am J Emerg Med 1990; 8:335-337.
    101) Miller MT, Sleigh J, & Rawlinson F: Amoxapine overdose: recovery after severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.69) and status epilepticus. Anaesth Intensive Care 1990; 18:246-251.
    102) Molloy DW, Penner SB, & Rabson J: Use of sodium bicarbonate to treat tricyclic antidepressant-induced s in a patient with alkalosis. Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130:1457-1459.
    103) Mordel A, Winkler E, & Almog S: Seizures after flumazenil administration in a case of combined benzodiazepine and tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Crit Care Med 1992; 20:1733-1734.
    104) Munger MA & Effron BA: Amoxapine cardiotoxicity. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:274-278.
    105) Nattel S & Mittleman M: Treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias resulting from amitriptyline toxicity in dogs. J Pharmacoal Exp Ther 1984; 231(2):430-435.
    106) Nattel S, Keable H, & Sasyniuk BI: Experimental amitriptyline intoxication: electrophysiologic manifestations and management. J Cardiovas Pharmacol 1984; 5:83-89.
    107) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    108) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    109) Nosko MG, McLean DR, & Chin WDN: Loss of brainstem and pupillary reflexes in amoxapine overdose: a case report. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:117-122.
    110) Ota KY, Turek I, & Kurkland AA: Clinical trial of amoxapine (CL 37,772) with depressed patients. Curr Ther Res 1972; 14:381-389.
    111) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    112) Pentel P & Benowitz N: Efficacy and mechanism of actio of sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of desipramine toxicity in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984; 230:12-19.
    113) Peterson CD: Seizures induced by acute loxapine overdose. Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:1089-1091.
    114) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    115) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    116) Product Information: ADASUVE(TM) oral inhalation powder, loxapine oral inhalation powder. Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per manufacturer), Mountain View, CA, 2012.
    117) Product Information: BREVIBLOC(TM) intravenous injection, esmolol HCl intravenous injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (per FDA), Deerfield, IL, 2012.
    118) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    119) Product Information: amoxapine oral tablets, amoxapine oral tablets. Physicians Total Healthcare, Inc. (per Manufacturer), Tulsa, OK, 2009.
    120) Product Information: amoxapine oral tablets, amoxapine oral tablets. Watson Pharma, Inc. (per Daily Med), Corona, CA, 2009a.
    121) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    122) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    123) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    124) Product Information: loxapine oral capsules, loxapine oral capsules. Lannett Company, Inc. (per DailyMed), Philadelphia, PA, 2011.
    125) Product Information: loxapine oral capsules, loxapine oral capsules. Watson Pharma, Inc., Corona, CA, 2010.
    126) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    127) Pumariega AJ, Muller B, & Rivers-Bukleley N: Acute renal failure secondary to amoxapine overdose. JAMA 1982; 248:3141-3142.
    128) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    129) Roberge RJ & Martin TG: Mixed fluoxetine/loxapine overdose and atrial flutter. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23:586-590.
    130) Rogol AD, Schoumacher R, & Spyker DA: Generalized convulsions as the presenting sign of amoxapine intoxication. Clin Pediatr 1984; 23:235-237.
    131) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press (internet version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    132) Sasyniuk BI, Jhamandas V, & Valois M: Experimental amitriptyline intoxication: treatment of cardiac toxicity with sodium bicarbonate. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 1052-1059.
    133) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    134) Sedlacek SM, Rudolf PM, & Kaehny WD: Amoxapine-associated agranulocytosis with thrombocytosis occurring early during recovery. Am J Med 1986; 80:533-536.
    135) Selinger K, Leber G, & Hill HM: A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of amoxapine in human plasma. J Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis 1989; 7:1001-1007.
    136) Shepard FM: Amoxapine intoxication in an infant: seizures arrested with diazepam. South Med J 1983; 76:543-544.
    137) Shigemura J, Kuwahara T, & Nomura S: Successful treatment of rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure following amoxapine overdose. Int J Psych Clin Pract 2001; 5:287-290.
    138) Singh AN, Barlas C, & Singh S: A neurochemical basis for the antipsychotic activity of loxapine: interactions with dopamine D1, D2, D4, and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor subtypes. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1996; 21:29-35.
    139) Smith CA: Amoxapine overdose (letter). N Z Med J 1982; 95:720.
    140) Sorensen MR: Acute myocardial failure following amoxapine intoxication (letter). J Clin Psychopharmacol 1988; 8:75.
    141) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    142) Tam CW, Olin BR, & Ruiz AE: Loxapine-associated rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140:975-976.
    143) Tarricone NW: Loxitane overdose (letter). Pediatrics 1998; 101:496.
    144) Taylor NE & Schwartz HI: Single case study: neuroleptic malignant syndrome following amoxapine overdose. J Nervous Mental Dis 1988; 176:249-251.
    145) Teba L, Schiebel F, & Dedhia HV: Beneficial effect of norepinephrine in the treatment of circulatory shock caused by tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:566-568.
    146) Thompson M & Dempsey W: Hyperuricemia, renal failure, and elevated creatine phosphokinase after amoxapine overdose. Clin Pharm 1983; 2:579-581.
    147) Thornton JE & Stahl SM: Case report of tardive dyskinesia and parkinsonism associated with amoxapine therapy. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141:704-705.
    148) Tollefson G & Lesar T: Nonketotic hyperglycemia associated with loxapine and amoxapine: case report. J Clin Psychiatry 1983; 44:347-348.
    149) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    150) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    151) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    152) Varga E & Simpson GM: Loxapine succinate in the treatment of uncontrolled destructive behavior. Curr Ther Res 1971; 13:737.
    153) Vernon DD, Banner W Jr, & Garrett JS: Efficacy of dopamine and norepinephrine for treatment of hemodynamic compromise in amitriptyline intoxication. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:544-549.
    154) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    155) Weaver KEC: Amoxapine overdose (letter). J Clin Psychiatry 1985; 46:545.
    156) Wedin GP, Oderda GM, & Klein-Schwartz W: Relative toxicity of cyclic antidepressants. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:797-804.
    157) Winek CL, Wahba WW, & Rosin L: Amoxapine fatalities: three case studies. Forensic Sci International 1984; 26:33-38.
    158) Wrenn K, Smith BA, & Slovis CM: Profound alkalemia during treatment of tricyclic antidepressant overdose: a potential hazard of combined hyperventilation and intravenous bicarbonate. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:553-555.
    159) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.