MOBILE VIEW  | 

PROPYLENE GLYCOL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Propylene glycol is a dihydroxy alcohol and is one of the most commonly used vehicles for hydrophobic compounds. It is readily metabolized to lactate, and in toxic quantities may cause lactic acidosis and renal insufficiency. Characteristic toxic findings include seizures and cardiovascular collapse. Lactic acidosis and hyperosmolality have been reported in burn patients treated topically with propylene glycol-containing ointments.

Specific Substances

    1) 1,2-propanediol
    2) Methyl Glycol
    3) 1,2-dihydroxypropane
    4) Propane-1,2-diol
    5) CAS 57-55-6
    6) METHYL GLYCOL (CAS 57-55-6)
    7) PROPYLENE GLYCOL 150
    8) PROPYLENE GLYCOL METHYL ETHER (BETA ISOMER)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C3-H8-O2

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) It is a colorless and practically odorless viscous liquid. It has a slight acrid taste but practically tasteless (HSDB, 2003).
    2) It is available as industrial or pharmaceutical grade (Ashford, 2001).
    3) It is available in refined, technical, USP, FCC, and feed grades (Lewis, 2001).
    B) SOURCES
    1) Propylene glycol is prepared from propylene. Propylene is converted to chlorohydrin and then hydrolyzed to produce propylene oxide. Propylene oxide then reacts with water, at a molar ratio of 1 mole of propylene oxide to 15-20 moles of water. Lastly a distillation step is needed to separate propylene glycol from dipropylene glycol (10% of total product) and tripropylene glycol (1% of total product). The industrial-grade is of high-purity; it has at least 99.5% purity. An even higher purity grade is called "super-pure" or USP grade. The impurities include chlorides (1-10 ppm), iron (0.5-1 ppm), heavy metals (0-5 ppm), arsenic (0-3 ppm), sulfate (0-0.006% by weight), and water (0-0.2% by weight) (Bingham et al, 2001; HSDB, 2003).
    2) Propylene glycol is prepared from glycerol (HSDB, 2003).
    3) Levorotatory propylene glycol is prepared from hydroxyacetone by yeast reduction. Propylene glycol is produced by the non-catalytic liquid-phase hydration of propylene oxide at 100-200 degrees C (HSDB, 2003).
    C) USES
    1) MEDICINE
    a) The following parenteral medications may contain propylene glycol as solvent: Lorazepam, phenobarbital, diazepam, phenytoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, etomidate, and nitroglycerin (Pillai et al, 2014). The following list of medications has also been published (Smolinske et al, 1987):
    Trade NameAmount of Propylene Glycol (W/V-mg/mL)
    Amidate362.6 mg
    Apresoline103.6 mg
    Ativan40% v/v
    Bactrim414.4 mg
    Berocca PN259 mg
    Brevibloc25% v/v
    Dilantin414.4 mg
    Dramamine518 mg
    Dramocen518 mg
    Embolex460 mg
    Konakion207 mg
    Konakion208 mg
    Lanoxin414.4 mg
    Lanoxin Pediatric414.4 mg
    Librium207 mg
    Loxitane725.2 mg
    Luminal Sodium702.4 mg
    MVC9 Plus310.8 mg
    MVI-12 (multivitamins)310.8 mg
    Nitro-BID45 mg
    Nembutal414.4 mg
    Nitrostat310.8 mg
    Nitroglycerin518 mg
    Pentobarbital Sodium414.4 mg
    Phenobarbital Sodium702.4 mg
    Phenytoin Sodium310.8 mg
    Phenytoin Sodium414.4 mg
    Septra414.4 mg
    Tridil310.8 mg
    Valium414.4 mg

    b) It is used as a humectant, an emollient, a hydroscopic agent (in respiratory inhalants to reduce viscosity of bronchial secretions), and an osmotic agent (in eye ointments for treatment of cornea edema) (Baselt, 2000; HSDB, 2003).
    c) It is used as a preservative in medicine (Baselt, 2000).
    d) It is used as a solvent in eardrops at a concentration of less than 10% and in other pharmaceuticals, foods, cosmetics and inks(Bingham et al, 2001).
    e) It is used as a glycogenic to increase blood glucose levels in veterinary medicine (if taken orally by ruminants) (HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003).
    f) It is used as a cryoprotective agent in therapeutics (HSDB, 2003).
    g) It is used as a vehicle in dermatologic and intravenous formulations (it is isotonic at 2 %) (Baselt, 2000; HSDB, 2003).
    h) It can be used to treat X-linked ichthyosis and ichthyosis vulgaris (HSDB, 2003).
    2) CONSUMER PRODUCTS
    a) It is used in room deodorants, all-purpose cleaners and as a disinfectant at a concentration of 10.7-100 % by weight (HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003)
    b) It is used as a solvent in permanent hair colorant formulation for a medium brown shade and in food colors and flavors (HSDB, 2003).
    c) It is used as a humectant in tobacco and in dentifrices (HSDB, 2003).
    d) It is used as a preservative, texturing agent, humectant, and source of carbohydrates in soft-moist pet foods and animal feeds, in concentrations of 5 to 13 percent on a dry-weight basis (Christopher et al, 1989; Bingham et al, 2001).
    e) It is used as an emollient in cosmetic creams and suntan lotions(Harbison, 1998; Howard, 1990; HSDB, 2003; Lewis, 1998).
    f) It is used as a humectant and emulsifier in foods (HSDB, 2003).
    g) It is used in paint primers and varnishes at a concentration of 21.2-50.2 % by weight. It helps provide freeze-thaw stability in latex paints(HSDB, 2003).
    3) INDUSTRIES
    a) It is used as a lubricant or heat-transfer fluid (such as in dairy refrigeration equipment and in aircraft deicing fluids) (HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003).
    b) It is used in solution with corrosion inhibitor as a low-temperature protection (such as in fresh-water plumbing for recreational vehicles and boats) (HSDB, 2003).
    c) It is used as a raw material for plasticizers (such as polypropylene adipate which is the linear polyester of propylene glycol and adipic acid) to influence the rigidity or flexibility of the resin. It is a component of cellophane(Bingham et al, 2001; HSDB, 2003).
    d) It is used to produce 2-methylpiperazine (in a gas-phase reaction with ethylenediamine), hydroxylated polyesters, polyether polyols, and 1,2-propylene diamine (by reductive amination) (HSDB, 2003).
    e) Vapor form of propylene glycol is used as an air sterilizer (an inhibitor of fermentation and mold growth) in hospitals and public buildings. It has been shown that vapors of propylene glycol can protect animals against airborne bacteria and influenza virus under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity (Bingham et al, 2001; HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003).
    f) It is used in fogging machines in discotheques and theatre (Raffle et al, 1994).
    g) Propylene glycol can be used as a general-purpose resin at a concentration of 2.2% (Bingham et al, 2001; HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Propylene glycol has many uses. It is an ingredient in antifreeze and deicing fluids, foods, drugs, cosmetics, liquid detergents, paints and coatings, inks, and polyester resins. Some examples of medications that include propylene glycol as an intravenous diluent/solvent include: etomidate, lorazepam, diazepam, esmolol, phenytoin, nitroglycerin, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, hydrocortisone, digoxin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Most significant human toxicity results from exposure to large does of intravenous medications that contain propylene glycol as a solvent/diluent.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: In general, propylene glycol is considered nontoxic; however, patients receiving large doses (especially by intravenous administration) can become acidotic, as it is metabolized to lactic acid. Reported renal toxicity from chronic exposure is thought secondary to proximal renal tubular injury, with excessive dilation of the proximal renal tubules and disrupted brush borders.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Significant toxicity is extremely rare, with case reports described in the literature developing after rapid intravenous administration or prolonged intravenous infusion of drugs with propylene glycol as a diluent.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) No adverse effects are expected from propylene glycol when administered in therapeutic doses to healthy individuals.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Most exposures will be asymptomatic. In patients with chronic exposure secondary to medication administration, there are reports of metabolic acidosis, hyperosmolality, and hyperglycemia. There are also concerns of prolonged intravenous administration causing proximal renal tubular toxicity. Finally, otic suspensions in animal studies have been linked to hearing impairment.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Rapid administration of propylene glycol during intravenous phenytoin infusion has been reported to cause cardiotoxicity, including hypotension, bradycardia, increased QRS intervals, increased T wave amplitudes, and transient ST elevations, ventricular dysrhythmias, and even death. Severe metabolic acidosis, decreased level of consciousness, and seizures have been reported after large acute ingestions, prolonged intravenous infusion of high doses and rarely after prolonged ingestion or topical use of normal therapeutic doses. Intravenous infusion of drugs with high concentrations of propylene glycol (more than 30%) can cause hemolysis.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) Stinging and mild hyperemia have occurred with eye exposure.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Rapid intravenous injection may be associated with hypotension, circulatory collapse, ECG changes and cardiac dysrhythmias.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Stupor and unconsciousness occurred in one patient following administration of vitamin D in 60 mL of propylene glycol. Grand mal seizures were noted in one case of chronic administration.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Compromised renal function has been reported following intravenous propylene glycol administration.
    0.2.11) ACID-BASE
    A) Lactic acidosis occurred in patients with underlying uremic renal disease. D-lactic acid acidosis has also developed.
    0.2.13) HEMATOLOGIC
    A) Hemolysis has been reported following administration of high doses of intravenous phenytoin preserved with propylene glycol and diazepam.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Allergic contact dermatitis has been reported.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for propylene glycol in humans.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the potential carcinogenic activity of propylene glycol in humans.
    0.2.22) OTHER
    A) Propylene glycol can cause some drug interactions.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Propylene glycol concentrations are not readily available at most institutions (usually measured via liquid chromatography using the same column that measures ethylene glycol). The test can take 2 to 3 hours to complete.
    B) Obtain serum electrolytes, BUN, creatinine, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    C) Obtain serum lactate and pH in patients with acidosis. Propylene glycol increases the osmolar gap.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Toxicity is self-limited, if the exposure is stopped. Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Dialysis and alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors may be required. Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids, add vasopressors, if hypotension persists. Administer benzodiazepines for seizures.
    C) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    1) Wash skin with soap and water, remove contaminated clothing.
    D) PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    1) As long as the patient has adequate liver and renal function, good supportive care and cessation of propylene glycol administration should be sufficient. Massive amounts of propylene glycol, either acute or chronic exposure can lead to lactic acidosis. Both propylene glycol and lactic acid can be removed by dialysis. Alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors, may also be considered to prevent lactic acidosis formation.
    E) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Gastrointestinal decontamination is not warranted. Wash exposed skin and irrigate exposed eyes.
    2) HOSPITAL: Toxicity is primarily from parenteral administration, decontamination is unnecessary.
    F) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with severe toxicity and mental status depression should be intubated.
    G) ANTIDOTE
    1) There is no specific antidote for propylene glycol.
    H) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) For severe acidosis or extremely high levels of propylene glycol, dialysis is an option for treatment. One indication for hemodialysis would be renal failure, as 45% of absorbed propylene glycol is excreted unchanged by the kidneys. Liver failure may be another indication for hemodialysis. In addition, severely symptomatic patients with extremely high levels (more than 70 mg/dL) of propylene glycol may benefit clinically from hemodialysis.
    I) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Patients with minimal symptoms after inadvertent exposure may be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: If the patient develops significant symptoms or the exposure was a self-harm attempt, then the patient should be sent to a health care facility.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Severely symptomatic patients (eg, significant CNS depression, lactic acidosis) should be admitted to the ICU. Often times, these patients are already in an intensive care setting, as their propylene glycol toxicity is iatrogenic.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for cases with severe toxicity or if the diagnosis is uncertain. For patients with extremely high levels of propylene glycol (more than 70 mg/dL), significant lactic acidosis, and/or renal or liver failure, obtain a nephrology consult for possible dialysis.
    J) PITFALLS
    1) Pitfalls in management can include not considering the diagnosis of propylene glycol toxicity and making sure there are not other causes of symptoms before ascribing them to elevated propylene glycol levels, and failing to discontinue all medications that contain propylene glycol as a diluent.
    K) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Propylene glycol has a half-life of 2 to 5 hours and a volume of distribution of 0.5 to 0.8 L/kg. About 45% of absorbed propylene glycol is excreted unchanged by the kidneys, while the remainder is oxidized to lactate, pyruvate and acetate via hepatic enzymes. Half-life is 2 to 5 hours in adults, but can be prolonged to 16 to 19 hours in infants.
    L) PREDISPOSING CONDITIONS
    1) Patients with impaired renal or liver function may have trouble excreting (metabolizing) propylene glycol and hence may be more sensitive to toxicity. Infants may be predisposed due to decreased renal elimination.
    M) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Differential diagnosis includes other causes of CNS sedation, elevated osmolar gaps, and lactic acidosis, such as sepsis.
    0.4.6) PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. See ORAL EXPOSURE for further information.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Doses associated with toxicity can be quite variable, with reports of associated toxicity ranging from thousands of grams of propylene glycol over weeks to months. Most patients who develop propylene glycol toxicity have significant illness that leads to the use of large doses of a medication containing propylene glycol as a diluent. In this setting, it becomes difficult to distinguish between the effects of propylene glycol and the underlying comorbid conditions.
    B) DAILY ALLOWABLE INTAKE: The World Health Organization has set the daily allowable intake of propylene glycol at 25 mg/kg (an estimated 1.75 g/day in a 70 kg individual).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Propylene glycol has many uses. It is an ingredient in antifreeze and deicing fluids, foods, drugs, cosmetics, liquid detergents, paints and coatings, inks, and polyester resins. Some examples of medications that include propylene glycol as an intravenous diluent/solvent include: etomidate, lorazepam, diazepam, esmolol, phenytoin, nitroglycerin, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, hydrocortisone, digoxin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Most significant human toxicity results from exposure to large does of intravenous medications that contain propylene glycol as a solvent/diluent.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: In general, propylene glycol is considered nontoxic; however, patients receiving large doses (especially by intravenous administration) can become acidotic, as it is metabolized to lactic acid. Reported renal toxicity from chronic exposure is thought secondary to proximal renal tubular injury, with excessive dilation of the proximal renal tubules and disrupted brush borders.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Significant toxicity is extremely rare, with case reports described in the literature developing after rapid intravenous administration or prolonged intravenous infusion of drugs with propylene glycol as a diluent.
    D) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) No adverse effects are expected from propylene glycol when administered in therapeutic doses to healthy individuals.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Most exposures will be asymptomatic. In patients with chronic exposure secondary to medication administration, there are reports of metabolic acidosis, hyperosmolality, and hyperglycemia. There are also concerns of prolonged intravenous administration causing proximal renal tubular toxicity. Finally, otic suspensions in animal studies have been linked to hearing impairment.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Rapid administration of propylene glycol during intravenous phenytoin infusion has been reported to cause cardiotoxicity, including hypotension, bradycardia, increased QRS intervals, increased T wave amplitudes, and transient ST elevations, ventricular dysrhythmias, and even death. Severe metabolic acidosis, decreased level of consciousness, and seizures have been reported after large acute ingestions, prolonged intravenous infusion of high doses and rarely after prolonged ingestion or topical use of normal therapeutic doses. Intravenous infusion of drugs with high concentrations of propylene glycol (more than 30%) can cause hemolysis.

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) Stinging and mild hyperemia have occurred with eye exposure.
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IRRITATION: Stinging, blepharospasm, and lacrimation followed by mild hyperemia have occurred following eye exposure. Residual edema was not present (Reinhardt et al, 1978; Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Undiluted propylene glycol irrigation into rabbit eyes produced a moderate reaction, while a 50% solution showed no injury (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) OTOTOXICITY: Instillation of propylene glycol into the middle ear, such as in patients with tympanostomy tubes, may result in cochlear toxicity (Morizono et al, 1980).
    B) In chinchillas, treatment with an otic suspension (eg, neomycin, polymixin B, hydrocortisone with 10.5% propylene glycol) for 6 weeks produced middle ear adhesions, cholesteatoma, and serious effusions. Symptoms were not observed with an ophthalmic suspension containing 2% propylene glycol (Vassalli et al, 1988).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Rapid intravenous injection may be associated with hypotension, circulatory collapse, ECG changes and cardiac dysrhythmias.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Intravenous injection of propylene glycol may produce hypotension, bradycardia, and ECG changes including increased amplification of the QRS and T waves (Wilson et al, 2000; Seay et al, 1997; Louis et al, 1967).
    a) When propylene glycol was infused slowly, the effects were only minimal (Goldfrank, 2002).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease and medical history of hypertension, seizure disorder, multiple strokes, diastolic heart failure, and chronic hepatitis C, developed generalized tonic clonic seizures after undergoing right cranioplasty surgery. Despite treatment with phenytoin, levetiracetam, IV lacosamide, and propofol, she continued to experience seizures. She received phenobarbital infusion to induce barbiturate coma and continued to undergo regular dialysis 3 times weekly, but developed severe hypotension on day 8, requiring vasopressors. Laboratory analysis revealed a high anion gap metabolic acidosis (anion gap of 22) due to lactic acidosis (12 g/dL; reference range: 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL), and serum albumin of 3.5 g/dL (range 3.5 to 5 g/dL). After further investigation, it was determined that the cause of high lactic acid was propylene glycol in the phenobarbital product. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital, the patient underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), resulting in the resolution of lactic acidosis and normalization of anion gap. After developing seizures again, she received lower doses of phenobarbital, in addition to IV phenytoin and valproic acid, but she developed severe high anion gap lactic acidosis (lactic acid 15 g/dL; range, 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL) and hypotension 4 days later. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital and valproic acid and supportive care, including CRRT, her condition improved the next day and she became hemodynamically stable with the resolution of lactic acidosis. Overall, she received about 3900 mg of IV phenobarbital and 8900 mg of IV phenytoin over 7 days (Pillai et al, 2014).
    B) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) Rapid administration of Dilantin(R) in 40% propylene glycol was associated with cardiac arrest and death in 6 elderly patients treated for dysrhythmias; most also had digitalis toxicity (Gellerman & Martinez, 1967; Goldschlager & Karliner, 1967; Russell & Bousvaros, 1968; Unger & Sklaroff, 1967; Zoneraich et al, 1976; Voigt, 1968; Karliner, 1967).
    a) Rapid intravenous infusion of phenytoin in a propylene glycol vehicle at rates greater than 50 mg/min and at concentrations of greater than 6.7 mg/mL has been associated with hypotension, bradycardia, dysrhythmias, agitation, drowsiness, apnea, and cardiac arrest. Patients with underlying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are at increased risk, and should be given phenytoin at infusion rates of 25 mg/min or less (Donovan et al, 1991).
    C) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) Depression of the SA node, multifocal ventricular dysrhythmias, and asystole are possible effects of IV administration (Louis et al, 1967).
    D) MYOCARDITIS
    1) Intravenous administration of phenytoin in propylene glycol resulted in myocardial cell death and myocytolysis in a 17-year-old girl. The cytotoxic damage was possibly due to phenytoin and/or propylene glycol (Hitotsumatsu et al, 1995).
    E) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) Propylene glycol, when rapidly infused, can result in widening of the QRS interval, increased T waves with occasional inversions, and transient ST elevations (Nordt, 1998).
    3.5.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) DYSRHYTHMIA
    a) Rapid IV administration has been associated with circulatory collapse and dysrhythmias in calves (Gross et al, 1979).
    2) Pulmonary Hypertension
    a) In sheep, intravenous administration of propylene glycol (30% solution, 0.5 mL/kg) resulted in pulmonary hypertension and decreased cardiac output by 70% (Quinn et al, 1990; Pearl & Rice, 1989).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Stupor and unconsciousness occurred in one patient following administration of vitamin D in 60 mL of propylene glycol. Grand mal seizures were noted in one case of chronic administration.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Central nervous system depression, sometimes with coma, may occur following propylene glycol toxicity, particularly in younger children and infants (Peleg et al, 1998; Glover & Reed, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: Stupor and unconsciousness which lasted for several hours with complete recovery were reported in one patient following administration of vitamin D in 60 mL of propylene glycol (Martin & Finberg, 1970).
    c) CNS toxicity (stupor, drowsiness, dysarthria, confusion) has been reported in patients receiving oral phenytoin solutions containing propylene glycol, but not when the same subjects ingested phenytoin capsules. The dose of propylene glycol was 20.7 g every 8 hours or 41.4 g every 12 hours (Yu et al, 1985).
    d) CASE REPORT: Coma, preceded by metabolic acidosis, was reported in a premature infant due to transdermal absorption of propylene glycol from a dressing of nitrofurazone dissolved in propylene glycol 96.8% and applied to first- and second-degree burn sites. An excessive urinary excretion of propylene glycol was reported. Within hours of removing the dressing, clinical improvement was noted (Peleg et al, 1998).
    B) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) PEDIATRIC
    1) CASE REPORT : Grand mal seizures were reported in an 11-year-old boy after 13 months of treatment with medication dissolved in propylene glycol and ethanol (total amount 4 to 8 mL/day) (Arulanatham & Genel, 1978).
    b) INFANT
    1) Low birth weight infants who received 3 g/day of propylene glycol from intravenous multivitamin solutions had a significantly higher incidence of seizures than infants receiving 300 mg/day (MacDonald et al, 1987). Infants receiving the larger dose also had higher BUN and serum osmolality, but the bilirubin, creatinine, and SGPT were the same as in the low dose group.

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Compromised renal function has been reported following intravenous propylene glycol administration.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CREATININE CLEARANCE-GLOMERULAR FILTRATION ABNORMAL
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE SERIES: Three patients, all receiving IV etomidate in a propylene glycol diluent for control of refractory cerebral edema, developed renal compromise (mean creatinine clearance 41 mL/min, increased serum creatinine and BUN). The authors speculate that the renal compromise was related to the propylene glycol vehicle (Levy et al, 1995).
    b) Acute renal failure with vacuolization and swelling of proximal renal tubular cells occurred in a 16-year-old boy receiving large doses of both phenobarbital and Pentothal in propylene glycol-based intravenous formulations (Yorgin et al, 1997).
    B) RENAL FUNCTION TESTS ABNORMAL
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old boy receiving large IV doses of phenobarbital and pentobarbital, both solubilized with propylene glycol (PG), developed proximal renal tubular cellular injury. The maximum amount of PG infused in a 24-hour period was 90.3 g. His serum osmolal gap rose to at least 27.4 mOsm/kg. His renal function tests returned toward normal following dose reductions of his medications (Yorgin et al, 1997).
    b) LORAZEPAM INFUSION: Serum creatinine levels became elevated in several patients who received intravenous lorazepam, either as an infusion or as bolus doses, delivered in propylene glycol. The total amount of propylene glycol received in these patients following lorazepam administration ranged from 444 g to 4565 g. The serum creatinine levels normalized following discontinuation of the lorazepam and substitution with propylene glycol-free midazolam (Wilson et al, 2005).
    1) In a retrospective chart review of 128 patients that had received a continuous infusion of lorazepam (range: 2 to 28 mg/hr), 8 patients developed elevated creatinine concentrations during the continuous infusion of lorazepam. The mean cumulative dose of lorazepam was 4305 mg (range: 1200 to 10920 mg), and the mean propylene glycol concentration at the time of peak serum creatinine was 1103 mcg/mL (range: 186 to 3450 mcg/mL). Serum creatinine increased at a median of 9 days (range: 3 to 60 days), with most patients having a decrease in creatinine within 3 days of drug cessation. A weak-to-moderate correlation (r = 0.53) was observed between the degree of serum creatinine concentration rise and propylene glycol concentration. However, the degree of serum creatinine concentration rise correlated positively with both cumulative lorazepam dose and duration of therapy (r = 0.43 and 0.60, respectively). Although the exact mechanism that produces an alteration in serum creatinine concentration is unknown, it may result from proximal renal tubular cell injury. The authors also suggest that clinical markers useful in determining propylene glycol toxicity in patients receiving prolonged lorazepam therapy were serum osmolality and osmol gap (Yaucher et al, 2003).
    C) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old patient who was treated with high-dose lorazepam for sedation developed propylene glycol-associated acute tubular necrosis and renal failure when his drug regimen was changed to include IV trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole which significantly increased his propylene glycol exposure. Both the lorazepam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were discontinued and the patient remained on venovenous hemofiltration; however, the patient died from hypoxic respiratory failure. Renal biopsy revealed disturbed brush borders of the proximal renal tubules compatible with resolving acute tubular necrosis (Hayman et al, 2003).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IN-VITRO STUDIES
    a) Human cultured kidney cells, exposed to propylene glycol, developed toxicity after 15 minutes of exposure, possibly due to an effect on plasma membrane integrity. The concentration used was similar to the concentrations observed in human plasma during medication usage involving propylene glycol as a drug vehicle (Morshed et al, 1994).

Acid-Base

    3.11.1) SUMMARY
    A) Lactic acidosis occurred in patients with underlying uremic renal disease. D-lactic acid acidosis has also developed.
    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LACTIC ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ORAL: Increased lactate levels with lactic acidosis may occur following ingestion of a propylene glycol-containing product, such as antifreeze, styling hair gel or medication with propylene glycol solvent (Brooks et al, 2001; Glover & Reed, 1996).
    1) Lactic acidosis occurred in a patient with underlying uremic renal disease receiving medication dissolved in propylene glycol (Cate & Hedrick, 1980).
    2) After the acute ingestion of ethanol and automotive antifreeze containing propylene glycol (PG). Serum levels of PG and lactate were as follows (Brooks et al, 2001):
    Time (hrs)PG (mg/dL)Lactate (mmol/L)
    1------
    7470---
    114192.8 (13 hrs)
    183363.1
    251883.1
    2890---
    31---1.4
    5701.3

    3) D-LACTIC ACID ACIDOSIS: Twelve hours after a 72-year-old man ingested a large amount of propylene glycol he became comatose and was admitted to the intensive care unit. Laboratory findings included an anion gap (27 mEq/L) metabolic acidosis (arterial pH, 7.16) with an increased osmolal gap. Biochemical analysis indicated that very high amounts of D-lactic acid (up to 110 mmol/L) produced metabolic acidosis. Hemodialysis was initiated and resulted in a decline of the acidosis and D-lactic acid levels. He regained consciousness 10 hours after initiation of the hemodialysis, but required dialysis for an additional 16 days to normalize his renal function (Jorens et al, 2004).
    b) TOPICAL PRODUCT: Mild lactic acidosis was reported in an 8-month-old infant treated with topical silver sulfadiazine cream for burns (Fligner et al, 1985).
    c) INTRAVENOUS: Following high dose infusions containing propylene glycol, lactic acidosis with increased anion and osmolar gap may occur. After discontinuation of the infusion, lactic acid concentrations generally return to normal (Parker et al, 2002; Cawley, 2001; Arbour & Esparis, 2000; Wilson et al, 2000).
    1) NITROGLYCERIN: Lactic acidosis was associated with administration of 31 to 414 g/day of propylene glycol to patients with renal dysfunction receiving intravenous nitroglycerin (Demey et al, 1986). Most cases of elevated lactate could be explained by underlying conditions of hemodynamic instability and tissue hypoxia, but one case was unexplained (Demey et al, 1988).
    a) Lactic acidosis also occurred in a 72-year-old woman with impaired renal function following an intravenous infusion of 322 mL daily (in a nitroglycerin product) (Demey et al, 1984).
    2) PARENTERAL MEDICATIONS: Serum and CSF lactate concentrations correlated with propylene glycol concentrations in 5 patients with normal renal function receiving parenteral medications containing propylene glycol. The serum PG level ranged from 6 to 711 mg/L. A patient with a PG level of 304 mg/L 5 hours after receiving Dilantin(R) and Valium(R) (total PG dose 512 mg/kg/day) had an anion gap of 21 and serum lactate of 15.5 mEq/L (Kelner & Bailey, 1985).
    3) LORAZEPAM: In 6 critically ill adults, who received high-dose lorazepam (greater than or equal to 10 mg/hour) for 48 hours or more, PG accumulation, as evidenced by a high anion gap metabolic acidosis with elevated osmol gap, was observed. In these patients, there was a significant correlation between infusion rate and PG concentrations. The osmol gap was the strongest predictor of serum PG concentrations (Arroliga et al, 2004).
    a) CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old alcoholic man with community acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory failure was mechanically ventilated and received continuous high-dose lorazepam (10 mg/hr) sedation for 4 days, and developed high anion gap (26 mEq/L) metabolic acidosis, along with high plasma osmolal gap. The patient had a markedly elevated D-lactic acidosis of 11.8 mmol/L and a high propylene glycol concentration (382 mg/dL). Following drug cessation and an extended course of hemodialysis (approximately 8 h), the patient was stable with rapid correction of acid-base status (Tsao et al, 2008).
    4) CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease and medical history of hypertension, seizure disorder, multiple strokes, diastolic heart failure, and chronic hepatitis C, developed generalized tonic clonic seizures after undergoing right cranioplasty surgery. Despite treatment with phenytoin, levetiracetam, IV lacosamide, and propofol, she continued to experience seizures. She received phenobarbital infusion to induce barbiturate coma and continued to undergo regular dialysis 3 times weekly, but developed severe hypotension on day 8, requiring vasopressors. Laboratory analysis revealed a high anion gap metabolic acidosis (anion gap of 22) due to lactic acidosis (12 g/dL; reference range: 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL), and serum albumin of 3.5 g/dL (range 3.5 to 5 g/dL). After further investigation, it was determined that the cause of high lactic acid was propylene glycol in the phenobarbital product. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital, the patient underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), resulting in the resolution of lactic acidosis and normalization of anion gap. After developing seizures again, she received lower doses of phenobarbital, in addition to IV phenytoin and valproic acid, but she developed severe high anion gap lactic acidosis (lactic acid 15 g/dL; range, 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL) and hypotension 4 days later. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital and valproic acid and supportive care, including CRRT, her condition improved the next day and she became hemodynamically stable with the resolution of lactic acidosis. Overall, she received about 3900 mg of IV phenobarbital and 8900 mg of IV phenytoin over 7 days (Pillai et al, 2014).
    B) INCREASED ANION GAP
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Metabolic abnormalities, including an increased anion gap, decreased serum bicarbonate, hyperosmolality, lactic acidosis, and metabolic acidosis, occurred in several patients who received intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, either as an infusion or as bolus doses, delivered in propylene glycol. The total amount of propylene glycol received following lorazepam or diazepam administration ranged from 28 to 4565 g. Resolution of the metabolic abnormalities occurred following discontinuation of the lorazepam and diazepam and substitution with propylene glycol-free midazolam (Wilson et al, 2005).
    1) CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old alcoholic man with community acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory failure was mechanically ventilated and received continuous high-dose lorazepam (10 mg/h) sedation for 4 days, and developed high anion gap (26 mEq/L) metabolic acidosis along with high plasma osmolal gap. The patient had a markedly elevated D-lactic acidosis of 11.8 mmol/L and a high propylene glycol concentration (382 mg/dL). Following drug cessation and an extended course of hemodialysis (approximately 8 h), the patient was stable with rapid correction of acid-base status (Tsao et al, 2008)
    b) CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease and medical history of hypertension, seizure disorder, multiple strokes, diastolic heart failure, and chronic hepatitis C, developed generalized tonic clonic seizures after undergoing right cranioplasty surgery. Despite treatment with phenytoin, levetiracetam, IV lacosamide, and propofol, she continued to experience seizures. She received phenobarbital infusion to induce barbiturate coma and continued to undergo regular dialysis 3 times weekly, but developed severe hypotension on day 8, requiring vasopressors. Laboratory analysis revealed a high anion gap metabolic acidosis (anion gap of 22) due to lactic acidosis (12 g/dL; reference range: 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL), and serum albumin of 3.5 g/dL (range 3.5 to 5 g/dL). After further investigation, it was determined that the cause of high lactic acid was propylene glycol in the phenobarbital product. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital, the patient underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), resulting in the resolution of lactic acidosis and normalization of anion gap. After developing seizures again, she received lower doses of phenobarbital, in addition to IV phenytoin and valproic acid, but she developed severe high anion gap lactic acidosis (lactic acid 15 g/dL; range, 0.6 to 2.4 g/dL) and hypotension 4 days later. Following the discontinuation of phenobarbital and valproic acid and supportive care, including CRRT, her condition improved the next day and she became hemodynamically stable with the resolution of lactic acidosis. Overall, she received about 3900 mg of IV phenobarbital and 8900 mg of IV phenytoin over 7 days (Pillai et al, 2014).
    3.11.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Lactic Acidosis
    a) In cats, propylene glycol results in accumulation of D-lactate as opposed to the normally occurring L-lactate (Christopher et al, 1990). This suggests direct metabolism of propylene glycol to D-lactate rather than endogenous production of L-lactate due to the acidosis or hypoxia. The significance of this in humans is unknown.

Hematologic

    3.13.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hemolysis has been reported following administration of high doses of intravenous phenytoin preserved with propylene glycol and diazepam.
    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) IV injection can produce intravascular hemolysis in humans (Demey et al, 1986).
    b) CASE SERIES: Hemolysis occurred in 3 of 28 patients receiving an intravenous nitroglycerin preparation containing 27% to 50% propylene glycol. In one case, the drug was administered simultaneously with packed red blood cells (Demey et al, 1988).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old woman, treated with 870 mg diazepam containing 174 mL of 40% propylene glycol vehicle, over a 56-hour period, experienced a drop in hematocrit from 45 to 26. Additionally, drops in red blood cell count and hemoglobin were reported. Hemolysis due to propylene glycol and hemodilution were suspected to have caused the decreased hematocrit (Elko et al, 1997).
    d) Hemolysis is avoidable by limiting the propylene glycol content to 30% (v/v) and by avoiding concurrent red blood cell infusion through the same IV line (Randolph & Mallery, 1944).
    B) THROMBOPHLEBITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Intravenous injection of diazepam or etomidate in propylene glycol vehicles is associated with a high incidence of thrombophlebitis.
    1) CASE SERIES: In a study of 44 patients receiving diazepam, 23% developed venous complications by the third day and 39% by the tenth day (Hegarty & Dundee, 1977).
    2) CASE SERIES: In a study comparing the venous sequelae of diazepam in various solvents, the incidence was 48% with propylene glycol, 9% with Cremophor, and 6% with soybean oil (Schou Olesen & Huttel, 1980).
    3.13.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEMOLYSIS
    a) IV injection produces intravascular hemolysis in sheep (Potter, 1958).
    b) CATS fed diets containing 6% or 12% propylene glycol had dose-related increase in Heinz body formation within 2 weeks. Punctate reticulocytes were significantly increased in the cats fed 12% propylene glycol, and mean RBC survival decreased by 30% and 55% in cats fed 6% or 12% propylene glycol, respectively (Bauer et al, 1992) (Bauer et al, 1992b).
    c) RATS dosed once with either 73 or 294 mg of oral propylene glycol experienced a significant and progressive decrease in blood hemoglobin concentration, PCV and RBC counts for up to 2 days. Decreased MCV and increased MCHC were significant and PCV changes were accompanied by significant elevations in reticulocyte counts, plasma hemoglobin concentration, and spleen weights. Hemolysis was the most prominent change. All values returned to normal by day 8 following treatment (Saini et al, 1996).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Allergic contact dermatitis has been reported.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN IRRITATION
    1) Skin irritation is minimal; can be irritating to mucous membranes. When used under occlusive dressings it can be a primary irritant (Trancik & Maibach, 1982).
    B) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) Contact dermatitis may develop with topical preparations containing propylene glycol (El Sayed et al, 1995; Kim & Kim, 1994) (Fischer, 1977).
    2) Propylene glycol causes allergic contact dermatitis in up to 12.5% of tested individuals (Hannuksela & Forstrom, 1978; Adams & Maibach, 1985; Eun & Kim, 1989; Catanzaro & Smith, 1991). Patch test reactions can recur in hypersensitive patients given an oral propylene glycol challenge (Hannuksela & Forstrom, 1978).
    3) CASE REPORT: Systemic contact dermatitis occurred in a 36-year-old woman following IV injection of Valium(R) in a 40% propylene glycol diluent (Fisher, 1995). Previous exposure to K-Y Lubricating Jelly(R) (5% aqueous solution of propylene glycol) during a gynecological exam resulted in pruritic vulvitis.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ENZYMES/SPECIFIC PROTEIN LEVELS - FINDING
    1) Elevated CPK is common following intramuscular injection (Greenblatt et al, 1976).
    3.15.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HYPERTONIA
    a) MICE: Propylene glycol significantly increased the frequency and amplitude of the endplate potential in an in vitro mouse study of nerve-diaphragm preparations. Propylene glycol has an excitatory effect on both the pre- and postsynaptic membranes of the mouse neuromuscular junction (Hattori & Maehashi, 1995).
    b) FROG: Hattori & Maehashi (1993) demonstrated an increased frequency and amplitude of endplate potential leading to skeletal muscle excitation in frog nerve-muscle preparations treated with propylene glycol.
    2) MYOPATHY
    a) RABBITS: Propylene glycol was myotoxic, with cytotoxic calcium levels implicated in cell death of skeletal muscle cells following IM injections (Chu & Brazeau, 1994).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) CASE REPORT: Episodes of hypoglycemia were described in a 15-month-old boy who received ascorbic acid 750 mg/day in a propylene glycol vehicle (7.5 mL/day) for 8 days (Martin & Finberg, 1970).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) WHITE BLOOD CELL ABNORMALITY
    1) Propylene glycol is cytotoxic to natural killer cells in concentrations of 1% in vitro. Neutrophil function was decreased at concentrations of 0.5% and 1% in vitro. The significance of these effects for the human immune system is unknown (Denning & Webster, 1987).
    2) Propylene glycol suppresses oxidative burst in human neutrophils (Morisaki, 1989).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for propylene glycol in humans.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Propylene glycol is not teratogenic in rabbits (Schumacher et al, 1968; Hansen & Meyer, 1978), chickens (Gebhardt, 1968; McLaughlin, 1963), rats (p 8; Robertson, 1947), and monkeys (Robertson, 1947). When given at 30 percent in the diet, it affected reproduction in rats (Whitlock, 1944), but this may have been due to a nonspecific effect of nutritional insufficiency.
    2) Propylene glycol was fetotoxic and increased post-implantation mortality when injected intraperitoneally into mice (RTECS, 2003). This is at odds with the preponderance of the literature; propylene glycol has been used as a negative control in many reproductive studies. Administration of 0.2 mL of 10 percent propylene glycol to rats during the first 10 days of pregnancy produced no adverse fetal effects (El-Shabrawy & Arbid, 1988).
    3) Administration of propylene glycol to mice (1300 to 5600 mg/kg) during ovulation and fertilization increased the incidence of aneuploidy (Mailhes et al, 1997).
    4) Propylene glycol is widely used as a cryopreservative for ova used in animal and human in-vitro fertilization.
    5) Only the monomethyl ether acetate form of propylene glycol has been teratogenic in rabbits (Schardein, 2000).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS57-55-6 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the potential carcinogenic activity of propylene glycol in humans.
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Propylene glycol was not carcinogenic in experimental animals (Gaunt, 1972; Morris, 1942; Robertson, 1947; Stenback & Shubik, 1974; Iversen, 1984). It decreased the activity of other carcinogens when fed to rats and hamsters (Longnecker, no date).
    2) Two separate rodent studies where propylene glycol was given subcutaneously or applied to the skin in various strengths reported no evidence of tumors (Bingham et al, 2001).

Genotoxicity

    A) Propylene glycol was found to cause DNA inhibition and was positive in cytogenetic studies in mice and hamster fibroblasts. It has been found to cause mutations in fruit fly larvae and sperm cell chromosomal aberrations when injected into mice. It has been negative in the Ames salmonella assay.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Propylene glycol concentrations are not readily available at most institutions (usually measured via liquid chromatography using the same column that measures ethylene glycol). The test can take 2 to 3 hours to complete.
    B) Obtain serum electrolytes, BUN, creatinine, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    C) Obtain serum lactate and pH in patients with acidosis. Propylene glycol increases the osmolar gap.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Propylene glycol may cause an increased osmolar gap (Fligner et al, 1985; Lolin et al, 1988), however, a normal osmolar gap cannot be relied upon to exclude the diagnosis of propylene glycol intoxication.
    2) Monitor blood glucose and serum lactate in symptomatic patients.
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor arterial blood gases in all symptomatic patients.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Monitor ECG in symptomatic patients.

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Propylene glycol may be measured by gas-liquid chromatography with flame ionization detection (Velendzas & McKay, 1999; Yu & Sawchuk, 1983).
    2) Apple et al (1993) reported propylene glycol interference in gas chromatography assays of ethylene glycol. The authors cautioned against using propylene glycol as an internal standard for quantifying ethylene glycol (Apple et al, 1993).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Severely symptomatic patients (eg, significant CNS depression, lactic acidosis) should be admitted to the ICU. Often times, these patients are already in an intensive care setting, as their propylene glycol toxicity is iatrogenic.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with minimal symptoms after inadvertent exposure may be managed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for cases with severe toxicity or if the diagnosis is uncertain. For patients with extremely high levels of propylene glycol (more than 70 mg/dL), significant lactic acidosis, and/or renal or liver failure, obtain a nephrology consult for possible dialysis.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) If the patient develops significant symptoms or the exposure was a self-harm attempt, then the patient should be sent to a health care facility.

Monitoring

    A) Propylene glycol concentrations are not readily available at most institutions (usually measured via liquid chromatography using the same column that measures ethylene glycol). The test can take 2 to 3 hours to complete.
    B) Obtain serum electrolytes, BUN, creatinine, and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    C) Obtain serum lactate and pH in patients with acidosis. Propylene glycol increases the osmolar gap.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Acute toxicity after ingestion is unlikely. Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is generally unnecessary.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Significant toxicity is very unlikely after ingestion. Consider activated charcoal only after a very large ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Following acute ingestion, signs of toxicity are not as likely as following intravenous overdoses. Toxicity is self-limited, if the exposure is stopped. Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Dialysis and alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors may be required for severe toxicity. Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids, add vasopressors, if hypotension persists. Administer benzodiazepines for seizures.
    B) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    C) ACIDOSIS
    1) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS: Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with sodium bicarbonate, 1 to 2 mEq/kg is a reasonable starting dose(Kraut & Madias, 2010). Monitor serum electrolytes and arterial or venous blood gases to guide further therapy.
    D) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    E) BRADYCARDIA
    1) ATROPINE/DOSE
    a) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    1) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    2) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis was effective in removing propylene glycol in a patient with renal dysfunction (Demey et al, 1988).
    2) A 34-year-old female developed hyperosmolality with lactic metabolic acidosis following cumulative high-dose lorazepam infusions over 24 days. After stopping the infusion, serum osmolality and propylene glycol levels were measured at the start of hemodialysis, 2 hours after completion and 12 hours postdialysis. A significant reduction in the osmolar gap (97 predialysis and 27 2 hours postdialysis) and serum propylene glycol concentration (520 mg/dL predialysis and 170 mg/dL 2 hours postdialysis) was noted (Parker et al, 2002).
    3) In another case, a 62-year-old alcoholic man with acute respiratory failure developed high anion gap metabolic acidosis (anion gap, 26 mEq/L) and high plasma osmolal gap (81.4 mOsm/kg H2O) after receiving continuous high-dose lorazepam (10 mg/hr) sedation for 4 days. Lorazepam was stopped and replaced with midazolam. Serum propylene glycol concentration was 382 mg/dL predialysis, with a concentration of 0 approximately 8 hours after an extended course of hemodialysis. A rapid correction in acid-base status was also observed (Tsao et al, 2008).

Case Reports

    A) INFANT
    1) An 8-month-old infant with second- and third-degree burns over 8% of the total body surface was treated with topical silver sulfadiazine cream in a propylene glycol base for 6 days. On the tenth day, desquamation of the skin on 70% of the body surface area led to reinstitution of the cream covering 78% of his body surface area. On the twelfth day, cardiopulmonary arrest occurred one hour after a dressing change. The next day, the serum osmolality was elevated, with a peak osmolar gap of 130 mOsm/kg H2O, and the patient had a mild lactic acidosis. The total dose of propylene glycol was 9 g/kg for 24 hours (Fligner et al, 1985).
    B) ACUTE EFFECTS
    1) Martin & Finberg (1970) described sinus dysrhythmia, tachypnea, tachycardia, and brief unresponsiveness following oral administration of 7.5 mL/day for 8 days in a 15-month-old boy. Over the next 3 days several similar episodes occurred, each associated with hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels of 41 and 42 mg/dL).
    C) ADULT
    1) Administration of propylene glycol 322 mL/day intravenously in a nitroglycerin preparation for 3 days resulted in lactic acidosis, hyperosmolality, CNS depression (disorientation, stupor, coma), and hemolysis in a 72-year-old woman with impaired renal function. The plasma propylene glycol level was 9.1 g/L (910 mg/dL) (Demey et al, 1984).
    D) PEDIATRIC
    1) Arulanantham & Genel (1978) reported an 11-year-old boy who developed seizures following oral administration of vitamin D in a propylene glycol vehicle (2 to 4 mL twice daily) for 13 months. Seizures resolved following discontinuation.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Doses associated with toxicity can be quite variable, with reports of associated toxicity ranging from thousands of grams of propylene glycol over weeks to months. Most patients who develop propylene glycol toxicity have significant illness that leads to the use of large doses of a medication containing propylene glycol as a diluent. In this setting, it becomes difficult to distinguish between the effects of propylene glycol and the underlying comorbid conditions.
    B) DAILY ALLOWABLE INTAKE: The World Health Organization has set the daily allowable intake of propylene glycol at 25 mg/kg (an estimated 1.75 g/day in a 70 kg individual).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ADULT
    1) Propylene glycol is practically nontoxic. The oral lethal dose is over 15 g/kg; for a 70 kg (150 lb) person, more than 1 quart (2.2 lb) may be lethal (HSDB, 2003).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Serum propylene glycol levels up to 1000 mg/dL do not correlate well with clinical status (HSDB, 2003).
    2) Twenty-five mg/kg is the estimated acceptable daily intake as a food additive (Nordt SP & Vivero LE, 2002). It has been estimated that propylene glycol is one third as intoxicating as ethanol on a weight basis.
    B) ADULT
    1) It has been considered relatively nontoxic. It is used in intravenous medications at concentrations up to 80% by weight. There have been reports that its use in pharmaceuticals has produced seizures, lactic acidosis, and a decreased level of consciousness (Baselt, 2000). Based on studies in rats, it is estimated that a 70 kg person can tolerate a daily oral intake of up to 1.8 lb of propylene glycol (Bingham et al, 2001).
    2) Single oral doses of 1.5 g/kg have been used to treat glaucoma, with slight dizziness noted as a side effect (Goldsmith, 1978).
    3) A 60-year-old man developed a total propylene glycol load of 540 g following 5 days of lorazepam infusions (total lorazepam dose of 1302 mg). The patient developed an osmolar gap metabolic (lactic) acidosis. After discontinuation of lorazepam, the lactic acid concentration and anion and osmolar gaps returned to normal within 72 hours (Arbour & Esparis, 2000).
    C) INFANT
    1) Single doses of 60 mL of propylene glycol were reported to cause stupor in infants (Martin & Finberg, 1970).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CASE REPORTS
    a) INFANT
    1) Serum levels of 930 milligrams/deciliter were associated with hyperosmolality following administration of 3 grams/day in a premature infant (Glasgow et al, 1983).
    2) A serum level of 771 milligrams/deciliter was demonstrated in an 8-month-old infant with mild lactic acidosis due to topical administration of propylene glycol (Fligner et al, 1985).
    b) ADULT
    1) Lactic acidosis, coma, and hyperosmolality were reported in an elderly patient with a propylene glycol serum level of 910 milligrams/deciliter (Demey et al, 1984).
    2) Through least-squares regression analysis of data from 5 patients receiving propylene-glycol containing intravenous solutions in whom serial PG and lactate levels were obtained, serum PG concentrations greater than 177 milligrams/liter were required to increase the serum lactate level by 6 milliequivalents/liter and result in an elevated anion gap (Kelner & Bailey, 1985).
    3) Following 3 days of lorazepam infusions containing propylene glycol (PG), a 34-year-old woman was reported to have PG serum levels on day 3 of 12 milligrams/deciliter. Calculated doses of PG on days 1 through 3 were reported as 26,975, 129,895 and 126,575 milligrams, respectively. The patient developed anion gap metabolic acidosis with hyperlactacidemia, hyperosmolality, and increased osmolal gap, all of which improved on cessation of the lorazepam infusion (Cawley, 2001).
    4) A 60-year-old male developed PG serum level of 78 milligrams/deciliter following 5 days of lorazepam infusions, with a calculated PG load of 540 grams. The patient developed an osmolar gap metabolic (lactic) acidosis which returned to normal within 72 hours after stopping the lorazepam infusion (Arbour & Esparis, 2000).
    5) In 6 critically ill adults who received high-dose lorazepam (greater than or equal to 10 mg/hour) for 48 hours or more, PG accumulation, as evidenced by a high anion gap metabolic acidosis with elevated osmol gap, was observed. In these patients, the osmol gap was the strongest predictor of serum PG concentrations (Arroliga et al, 2004).
    6) A 46-year-old male was reported to have a serum PG level of 1300 milligrams/deciliter after receiving approximately 3000 milligrams intravenous diazepam over 24 hours. The patient developed osmolar gap lactic metabolic acidosis which improved following hemodialysis (Wilson et al, 2000).
    7) Serum PG levels were compared to total osmol gap in a patient receiving high-dose infusions of lorazepam and nitroglycerin (Velendzas & McKay, 1999):
    SAMPLETOTAL OSMOL GAPSERUM PG (mg/dL)
    12497.7
    232168.7
    353406.4
    455348.8

    8) Patients have been conscious with serum levels of 760 mg/dL (HSDB, 2003)

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS57-55-6 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS57-55-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS57-55-6 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Assessed under the IRIS program. ; Listed as: Propylene glycol
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS57-55-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: Budavari, 1996; CHRIS, 2003; Bingham et al, 2001; HSDB, 2003; OHM/TADS, 2003; RTECS, 2003
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 9718 mg/kg -- caused chronic pulmonary edema, affected tubules and glomeruli of the excretory system, and induced changes in spleen
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 0.5-5 g/kg (CHRIS, 2003)
    b) 22 g/kg (RTECS, 2003)
    c) 23.9-31.8 g/kg (HSDB, 2003)
    3) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 17,370 mg/kg -- caused cyanosis and changes in muscle activity
    4) LD50- (INTRAMUSCULAR)RAT:
    a) 14 g/kg
    5) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 6660 mg/kg
    6) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 25 mL/kg (Budavari, 1996)
    b) 20 g/kg (RTECS, 2003)
    c) 26,380 mg/kg for 14 D (OHM/TADS, 2003)
    d) 30 g/kg (HSDB, 2003)
    e) 21.0-33.7 g/kg
    7) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    a) 22,500 mg/kg
    8) TCLo- (INHALATION)RAT:
    a) 2180 mg/m(3) for 6H/90D-I -- affected food intake behavior, spleen weight, and dehydrogenases biochemistry

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) SKELETAL MUSCLE EXCITATION - Propylene glycol has been shown to have an excitatory effect on the skeletal muscle of the frog and mouse. Propylene glycol appears to increase the amplitude and frequency of the motor endplate potential. It facilitates neuromuscular transmission via acceleration of transmitter release from the nerve terminals and increases acetylcholine sensitivity of the endplates (Hattori & Maehashi, 1993; Hattori & Maehashi, 1995). The implications of the mechanism in reported human toxicity are unclear.

Physical Characteristics

    A) It is a colorless and practically odorless viscous liquid. It has a slight acrid taste, but it is considered practically tasteless (HSDB, 2005).

Molecular Weight

    A) 76.09

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) Odorless (CHRIS, 2005)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) The administration of propylene glycol 5 g/kg daily (20% of dietary intake) was associated with development of hemolytic anemia, reticulocytosis, and slight hyperbilirubinemia (Weil et al, 1971).
    11.1.5) EQUINE/HORSE
    A) Inadvertent administration of 3/4 gallon of propylene glycol to a filly resulted in ataxia and depression, with a fetid odor to the feces. Administration of 1/2 to 1 gallon to 3 horses resulted in identical symptoms within 15 to 30 minutes, with recovery within 3 days. Administration of 2 gallons to a 454 kg gelding resulted in death 3 days later (Myers & Usenik, 1969).
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) The administration of propylene glycol in concentrations found in commercial diets (1.6 g/kg; 12% of diet on dry weight) and at a higher concentration of 8 g/kg, produced a reproducible dose-dependent increase in Heinz body percentage by 28% in the low-dose and 92% in the high-dose group. Cats with higher food intakes, such as lactating mothers and nursing kittens, are at increased risk for developing propylene-glycol-induced hemolytic anemia (Christopher et al, 1989).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    15) Adams RM & Maibach HI: A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 13:1062-1069.
    16) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    17) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    18) Apple FS, Googins M, & Resen D: Propylene glycol interference in gas-chromatographic assay of ethylene glycol (Letter). Clin Chem 1993; 39:167.
    19) Arbour R & Esparis B: Osmolar gap metabolic acidosis in a 60-year-old man treated for hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest 2000; 118:545-546.
    20) Arroliga AC, Shehab N, & McCarthy K: Relationship of continuous infusion of lorazepam to serum propylene glycol concentration in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1709-1714.
    21) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 2001.
    22) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemical in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    23) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    24) Bauer MC, Weiss DJ, & Perman V: Hematological alterations in kittens induced by 6 and 12% dietary propylene glycol. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992b; 34:127-131.
    25) Bekeris L, Baker C, & Fenton J: Propylene glycol as a cause of an elevated serum osmolality. Am J Clin Pathol 1979; 72:633-636.
    26) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    27) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    28) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, Vol 4. 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001.
    29) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    30) Brooks DE, Wallace KL, & Katz K: Acute propylene glycol ingestion (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:482.
    31) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    32) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996, pp 1349.
    33) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    34) CHRIS: CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    35) CHRIS: CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2005; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    36) Calas E: Ann Dermatol Venereol 1978; 105:345-347.
    37) Catanzaro JM & Smith JG: Propylene glycol dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 24:90-95.
    38) Cate JC & Hedrick R: Propylene glycol intoxication and lactic acidosis. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:1237.
    39) Cawley MJ: Short-term lorazepam infusion and concern for propylene glycol toxicity: case report and review. Pharmacother 2001; 21:1140-1144.
    40) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    41) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    42) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    43) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    44) Christopher MM, Eckfield JH, & Eaton JW: Propylene glycol ingestion causes D-lactic acidosis. Lab Invest 1990; 62:114-118.
    45) Christopher MM, Perman V, & Eaton JW: Contribution of propylene glycol-induced Heinz body formation to anemia in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194:1045-1056.
    46) Chu A & Brazeau GA: Solvent-dependent influences on skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium uptake and release. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 125:142-148.
    47) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    48) Clark CR: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 51:529-535.
    49) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2E. Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    50) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    51) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    52) Commens CA: Topical propylene glycol and hyperosmolality. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122:77-80.
    53) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    54) Demey H, Daelemans R, & De Broe ME: Propylene glycol intoxication due to intravenous nitroglycerin. Lancet 1984; 1:1360.
    55) Demey H, Daelemans R, & Verpooten GA: Propylene glycol side effects during intravenous nitroglycerin therapy (Abstract). , XII International Congress of the European Association of Poison Control Centres (EAPCC), World Congress of the World Federation of Associates of Clinical Toxicology and Poison Control Centres, Brussels, Belgium, 1986.
    56) Demey HE, Daelemans RA, & Verpooten GA: Propylene glycol-induced side effects during intravenous nitroglycerin therapy. Intensive Care Med 1988; 14:221-226.
    57) Denning DW & Webster DB: Detrimental effect of propylene glycol on natural killer cell and neutrophil function. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987; 39:236-238.
    58) Donovan PJ, Adams N, & Cline D: Phenytoin administration by constant intravenous infusion: Selective rates of administration. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:139-142.
    59) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    60) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    61) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    62) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    63) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    64) El Sayed F, Bayle-Lebey P, & Marguery MC: Contact dermatitis from propylene glycol in Rifocine(R). Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33:127-128.
    65) El-Shabrawy OA & Arbid M: Evaluation of some drug solvents for teratological investigations in rats. Egypt J Vet Sci 1988; 24:143-152.
    66) Elko C, Burgess J, & Robertson W: Propylene glycol in intravenous diazepam preparations: a case report of possible hemolysis (abstract). J Tox Clin Tox 1997; 35:503.
    67) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    68) Eun HC & Kim YC: Propylene glycol allergy from ketoconazole cream. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21:274-275.
    69) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    70) Fisher AA: Systemic contact dermatitis due to intravenous valium in a person sensitive to propylene glycol. Cutis 1995; 55:327-328.
    71) Fligner CL, Jack R, & Twiggs GA: Hyperosmolality induced by propylene glycol: a complication of silver sulfadiazine therapy. JAMA 1985; 253:1606-1609.
    72) Gaunt IF: Food Cosmetic Toxicol 1972; 10:151-162.
    73) Gebhardt DOE: Teratology 1968; 1:153-162.
    74) Gellerman GL & Martinez C: Fatal ventricular fibrillation following intravenous sodium diphenylhydantoin therapy. JAMA 1967; 200:161-162.
    75) Glasgow AM, Boeckx RL, & Miller MK: Hyperosmolality in small infants due to propylene glycol. Pediatrics 1983; 72:353-355.
    76) Glover ML & Reed MD: Propylene glycol: the safe diluent that continues to cause harm. Pharmacother 1996; 16:690-693.
    77) Goldfrank LR: Goldfrank's Toxicological Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    78) Goldschlager AW & Karliner JS: Ventricular standstill after intravenous diphenylhydantoin. Am Heart J 1967; 74:410-412.
    79) Goldsmith LA: Propylene glycol. Internat J Dermatol 1978; 17:703-705.
    80) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    81) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    82) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    83) Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI, & Koch-Weser J: Serum creatine phosphokinase concentrations after intramuscular chlordiazepoxide and its solvent. J Clin Pharmacol 1976; 16:118-121.
    84) Gross DR, Kitzman JV, & Adams HR: Cardiovascular effects of intravenous administration of propylene glycol and of oxytetracycline in propylene glycol in calves. Am J Vet Res 1979; 40:783-791.
    85) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    86) Gulati DK et al: Govt Reports Announcements & Index (GRA&I); Issue 8. National Technical Information Service, 1986.
    87) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1/31/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    88) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    89) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2005; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    90) Hallesky DW: US Patent No 4247552 01/27/81, Syntex USA, Inc, Nutley, NJ, 1981.
    91) Hannuksela M & Forstrom L: Reactions to peroral propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4:41-45.
    92) Hansen E & Meyer O: Toxicology 1978; 10:195-201.
    93) Harbison RD: Hamilton & Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby-Year Books, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    94) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    95) Hattori T & Maehashi H: Facilitation of mouse neuromuscular transmission by propylene glycol. Res Comm Mol Pathol Pharmacol 1995; 88:237-240.
    96) Hattori T & Maehashi H: Propylene glycol-induced skeletal muscle excitation. Food Chem Toxicol 1993; 31:647-650.
    97) Hayman M, Seidl EC, & Ali M: Acute tubular necrosis associated with propylene glycol from concomitant administration of intravenous lorazepam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Pharmacotherapy 2003; 23(9):1190-1194.
    98) Hegarty JE & Dundee JW: Sequelae after the intravenous injection of three benzodiazepines -- diazepam, lorazepam and flunitrazepam. Br Med J 1977; 2:1384-1385.
    99) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    100) Hitotsumatsu T, Iwaki T, & Fukui M: Toxic myocardial damage due to intravenous phenytoin administration. Histopathol 1995; 26:479-480.
    101) Howard PH: Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals. Volume II: Solvents, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1990.
    102) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    103) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    104) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    105) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    106) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    107) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    108) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    109) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    110) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    111) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th ed, 1-4, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
    112) IRIS : Integrated Risk Information System, (CD-ROM Version). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    113) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    114) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    115) Iversen OH: Carcinogenesis (London) 1984; 5:911-915.
    116) Jorens PG, Demey HE, & Schepens PJ: Unusual D-lactic acid acidosis from propylene glycol metabolism in overdose. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:163-169.
    117) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    118) Karliner JS: Intravenous diphenylhydantoin sodium (Dilantin) in cardiac arrhythmias. Dis Chest 1967; 51:256-269.
    119) Kelner MJ & Bailey DN: Propylene glycol as a cause of lactic acidosis. J Anal Toxicol 1985; 9:40-42.
    120) Kennedy GL Jr: Toxicology 1975; 5:159-162.
    121) Kim YJ & Kim JH: Allergic contact dermatitis from propylene glycol in Zovirax cream. Cont Derm 1994; 30:119-120.
    122) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    123) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    124) Kolloffel WJ, Weekers LE, & Goldhoorn PB: Pharmacokinetics of propylene glycol after rectal administration. Pharm World Sci 1996; 18:109-113.
    125) Kraut JA & Madias NE: Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6(5):274-285.
    126) Kulick MI, Lewis NS, & Bansal V: Hyperosmolality in the burn patient: analysis of an osmolal discrepancy. J Trauma 1980; 20:223-228.
    127) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    128) Lake PE & Ravie O: Br Poult Sci 1984; 25:145-150.
    129) Levy ML, Aranda M, Zelman V, et al: Propylene glycol toxicity following continuous etomidate infusion for the control of refractory cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 1995; 37(2):363-369.
    130) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    131) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 1997.
    132) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001.
    133) Liedholm H, Wahlin-Boll E, & Melander A: Mechanisms and variations in the food effect on propranolol bioavailability. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 38:469-475.
    134) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    135) Lolin Y, Francis DA, & Flanagan RJ: Cerebral depression due to propylene glycol in a patient with chronic epilepsy -- the value of the plasma osmolal gap in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 1988; 64:610-613.
    136) Louis S, Kutt H, & McDowell F: The cardiocirculatory changes caused by intravenous Dilantin and its solvent. Am Heart J 1967; 74:523-529.
    137) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    138) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    139) MacDonald MG, Getson PR, & Glasgow AM: Propylene glycol: increased incidence of seizures in low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1987; 79:622-625.
    140) Mailhes JB, Young D, & London SN: 1,2-propanediol-induced premature centromere separation in mouse oocytes and aneuploidy in one-cell zygotes. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:92-98.
    141) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    142) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    143) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    144) Martin G & Finberg L: Propylene glycol: a potentially toxic vehicle in liquid dosage form. J Pediatr 1970; 77:877-878.
    145) McLaughlin J Jr: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1963; 5:760-771.
    146) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    147) Miller DN & Bazzano G: Propanediol metabolism and its relation to lactic acid metabolism. Ann Acad Sci 1965; 119:957-973.
    148) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    149) Morgott DA & Nolan RJ: Nonlinear kinetics of inhaled propylene glycol monomethyl ether in Fischer 344 rats following single and repeated exposures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1987; 89:19-28.
    150) Morisaki H: Inhibition of neutrophil function by solvent of injectable sedatives -- effects of propylene glycol, ethanol and benzyl alcohol. Masui 1989; 38:1588-1596.
    151) Morizono T, Paparella MM, & Juhn SK: Ototoxicity of propylene glycol in experimental animals. Am J Otolaryngol 1980; 1:393-399.
    152) Morris HJ: J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1942; 24:158.
    153) Morshed KM, Jain SK, & McMartin KE: Acute toxicity of propylene glycol: an assessment using cultured proximal tubule cells of human origin. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1994; 23:38-43.
    154) Morshed KM, Nagpaul JP, & Majumdar: Kinetics of propylene glycol elimination and metabolism in rat. Biochem Med Metab Biol 1988; 39:90-97.
    155) Myers VS Jr & Usenik EA: Propylene glycol intoxication of horses. J Am Vet Assoc 1969; 155:1841.
    156) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    157) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    158) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    159) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    160) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    161) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    234) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    235) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    236) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    237) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    238) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    239) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    240) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    241) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    242) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    243) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    244) Nordt SP & Vivero LE : Pharmaceutical Additives. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 7th ed, 7th. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002, pp 835-846.
    245) Nordt SP: Pharmaceutical additives: Propylene glycol, in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 6th ed, Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT, 1998.
    246) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    247) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    248) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1/31/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    249) OHM/TADS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    250) OHM/TADS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. (Internet Version). Edition expires 2005; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    251) Parker MG, Fraser GL, & Watson DM: Removal of propylene glycol and correction of increased osmolar gap by hemodialysis in a patient on high dose lorazepam infusion therapy. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:81-84.
    252) Pearl RG & Rice SA: Propylene glycol-induced pulmonary hypertension in sheep. Pharmacology 1989; 39:383-389.
    253) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    254) Peleg O, Bar-Oz B, & Arad I: Coma in a premature infant associated with the transdermal absorption of propylene glycol. Acta Paediatr 1998; 87:1195-1196.
    255) Pfeiffer EH & Dunkelberg H: Food Cosmet Toxicol 1980; 18:115-118.
    256) Pillai U, Hothi JC, & Bhat ZY: Severe propylene glycol toxicity secondary to use of anti-epileptics. Am J Ther 2014; 21(4):e106-e109.
    257) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    258) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    259) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    260) Potter BJ: Hemoglobinuria caused by propylene glycol in sheep. Br J Pharmacol 1958; 13:385.
    261) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    262) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    263) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    264) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    265) Quinn DA, Robinson D, & Hales CA: Intravenous injection of propylene glycol causes pulmonary hypertension in sheep. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68:1415-1420.
    266) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires Apr/31/1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    267) RTECS: Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    268) Raffle PAB, Adams PH, & Baxter PJ: Hunter's Diseases of Occupations, Little, Brown & Co, Boston, MA, 1994.
    269) Rapoport IA: Dok Acas Nauk Ssr 1948; 59:1183-1186.
    270) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    271) Razvi F: Arogya (Manipal, India) 1979; 5:60-62.
    272) Reinhardt CF, Foderaro J, & Sprout WL: Propylene glycol eye wash. J Occup Med 1978; 20:164.
    273) Renard JP & Babinet C: J Exp Zool 1984; 230:443-448.
    274) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    275) Robertson OH: J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1947; 91:52-76.
    276) Ruddick JA: Toxicology, metabolism, and biochemistry of 1,2-propanediol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1972; 21:102-111.
    277) Russell MA & Bousvaros G: Fatal results from diphenylhydantoin administered intravenously. JAMA 1968; 206:2118-2119.
    278) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    279) Saini M, Dash S, & Nagpaul JP: Hematological alterations in propylene glycol-dosed female rats are minimal. Vet Human Toxicol 1996; 38:81-85.
    280) Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects, 3rd ed, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, NY, 2000.
    281) Schou Olesen A & Huttel MS: Local reactions to IV diazepam in three different formulations. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52:609-611.
    282) Schumacher H, Blake DA, & Gurian JM: A comparison of the teratogenic activity of thalidomide in rabbits and rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968; 160:189-240.
    283) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    284) Seay RE, Graves PJ, & Wilkin MK: Comment: possible toxicity from propylene glycol in lorazepam infusion (letter). Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31:647-648.
    285) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    286) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    287) Smolinske SC, Vandenberg SA, & Spoerke DG: Propylene glycol content of parenteral medications (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:491.
    288) Speth PAJ, Vree TB, & Neilen NFM: Propylene glycol pharmacokinetics and effects after intravenous infusion in humans. Ther Drug Monit 1987; 9:255-258.
    289) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    290) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    291) Stenback F & Shubik P: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1974; 30:7-13.
    292) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    293) Trancik RJ & Maibach HI: Propylene glycol: irritation or sensitization?. Contact Dermatitis 1982; 8:185-189.
    294) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    295) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    296) Tsao YT, Tsai WC, & Yang SP: A life-threatening double gap metabolic acidosis. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26(3):385-386.
    297) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    298) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    299) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    300) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    301) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    302) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    303) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    304) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    305) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    306) Unger AH & Sklaroff HJ: Fatalities following intravenous use of sodium diphenylhydantoin for cardiac arrhythmias. JAMA 1967; 200:159-160.
    307) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    308) Urben PG: Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 5th ed, 1-2, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, England, 1995.
    309) Uter W & Schwanitz HJ: Contact dermatitis from propylene glycol in ECG electrode gel. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:230-231.
    310) Vaille C: Ann Pharm Fr 1971; 29:577-582.
    311) Vassalli L, Harris DM, & Gradini R: Inflammatory effects of topical antibiotic suspensions containing propylene glycol in chinchilla middle ears. Am J Otolaryngol 1988; 9:1-5.
    312) Velendzas D & McKay C: Intravenous medication additives: a refinement in the interpretation of the elevated osmol gas (abstract). Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:655.
    313) Voigt GC: Death following intravenous sodium diphenylhydantoin. John Hopkins Med J 1968; 123:153-157.
    314) Weil CS, Woodside MD, & Smyth HF: Results of feeding propylene glycol in the diet to dogs for two years. Food Cosmetic Toxicol 1971; 9:479-490.
    315) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    316) Whitlock GP: Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1944; 57:124-125.
    317) Wilson KC, Reardon C, & Farber HW: Propylene glycol toxicity in a patient receiving intravenous diazepam (letter). New Engl J Med 2000; 343:815.
    318) Wilson KC, Reardon C, Theodore AC, et al: Propylene glycol toxicity: a severe iatrogenic illness in ICU patients receiving IV benzodiazepines: a case series and prospective, observational pilot study. Chest 2005; 128(3):1674-1681.
    319) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    320) Woycik CL & Walker PC: Correction and comment: possible toxicity from propylene glycol in injectable drug preparations (letter). Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31:1413.
    321) Yaucher NE, Fish JT, Smith HW, et al: Propylene glycol-associated renal toxicity from lorazepam infusion. Pharmacotherapy 2003; 23(9):1094-1099.
    322) Yorgin PD, Theodorou AA, & Al-Uzri A: Propylene glycol-induced proximal renal tubular cell injury. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30:134-139.
    323) Yu DK & Sawchuk RJ: Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of propylene glycol in plasma and urine. Clin Chem 1983; 29:2088-2090.
    324) Yu DK & Sawchuk RJ: Pharmacokinetics of propylene glycol in the rabbit. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1987; 15:453-471.
    325) Yu DK, Elmquist WF, & Sawchuk RJ: Pharmacokinetics of propylene glycol in humans during multiple dosing regimens. J Pharm Sci 1985; 74:876-879.
    326) Zoneraich S, Zoneraich O, & Siegel J: Sudden death following intravenous sodium diphenylhydantoin. Am Heart J 1976; 91:375-377.
    327) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.