MOBILE VIEW  | 

PROPOXYPHENE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Propoxyphene is an opioid analgesic with local anesthetic activity. It is a synthetic compound structurally related to methadone.

Specific Substances

    1) Dextropropoxyphene/d-propoxyphene
    2) Propoxyphene hydrochloride
    3) Propoxyphene napsylate
    4) NIOSH/RTECS EL 2900000
    5) CAS 469-62-5 (propoxyphene)
    6) CAS 1639-60-7 (dextropropoxyphene)

Available Forms Sources

    A) SOURCES
    1) Propoxyphene is one of four sterioisomers. Only the dextrorotatory isomer of the alpha racemate has analgesic activity. The levorotatory isomer, L-propoxyphene, however, has antitussive activity.
    2) These preparations contain either 32.5 or 65 mg of propoxyphene hydrochloride or 50 or 100 mg of propoxyphene napsylate.
    3) Some of these proprietary preparations contain active ingredients (eg, acetaminophen, aspirin, barbiturates, or caffeine, in addition to propoxyphene). Some are extended or slow-release formulations.
    4) WITHDRAWAL FROM MARKET
    a) In November 2010, the US FDA has recommended the removal of propoxyphene (brand name and generic formulations) from the market due to the risk of serious toxicity to the heart at therapeutic doses. Results of a study showed that therapeutic doses of propoxyphene produced alterations in ECG findings, including prolonged PR interval, widened QRS complex and prolonged QT interval, which may increase the risk for serious abnormal heart rhythms (US Food and Drug Administration, 2010).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Propoxyphene is a synthetic opioid used for the treatment of pain. Propoxyphene is sold in combination with acetaminophen or aspirin and as a single agent and is abused for euphoric effects. WITHDRAWAL FROM MARKET: In November 2010, the US FDA has recommended the removal of propoxyphene (brand name and generic formulations) from the market due to the risk of serious toxicity to the heart at therapeutic doses. Results of a study showed that therapeutic doses of propoxyphene produced alterations in ECG findings, including prolonged PR interval, widened QRS complex and prolonged QT interval, which may increase the risk for serious abnormal heart rhythms.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Propoxyphene binds Mu opioid receptors producing analgesia, sedation, euphoria, decreased GI motility, and pruritus. Propoxyphene is formulated to be taken orally. Absorption may be slowed due to decreased gastric motility.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Abusers may inject, snort or smoke as these routes achieve high serum levels rapidly, producing euphoria quickly. This puts them especially at risk for severe toxicity. Toxicology is an extension of the pharmacology (opioid effects). Norpropoxpyhene is the active metabolite of the drug. Unlike other opioids, both propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene have sodium channel blocking properties similar to type 1A antidysrhythmics. Cardiac sodium channel antagonism and CNS stimulation can cause cardiac dysrhythmias and seizures.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Propoxyphene exposures and severe toxicity were common in the past. However, as the use of propoxyphene has decreased, the frequency of severe exposures is decreasing.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, and vomiting may occur.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, and vomiting may occur. Pinpoint pupils, mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, hypotension, bradycardia, metabolic or respiratory acidosis, wide QRS complexes, ventricular dysrhythmias, or acute lung injury may develop. Patients may also be hypothermic. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia or from drug effect. Death may result from any of these complications.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Propoxyphene is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. A neonatal withdrawal syndrome has been reported in infants born to mothers taking high daily doses of propoxyphene.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) As combination products are common, measure serum salicylate and acetaminophen concentrations. Propoxyphene can delay gastric motility and thus delay peak acetaminophen or aspirin concentrations. However, the clinical significance of this is unclear.
    C) Propoxyphene plasma concentrations are not clinically useful or readily available. Screening urine toxicology immunoassays for opioids will likely not detect propoxyphene. No other specific lab work is needed in most patients but may be helpful in ruling out other causes of altered mental status if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    D) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in patients with moderate to severe toxicity with propoxyphene.
    E) Consider head CT and lumbar puncture to rule out intracranial mass, bleeding or infection.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may only need observation.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression not responsive to naloxone. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for severe toxicity. Administer benzodiazepines for seizures and hypertonic sodium bicarbonate for wide-complex dysrhythmias.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: GI decontamination should generally be avoided because of the risk of CNS depression or seizures and subsequent aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider decontamination if a patient presents shortly after an oral ingestion overdose and is not manifesting symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients that are manifesting signs of toxicity as they are at risk of coma or seizures and aspiration. If the airway is protected with orotracheal intubation, charcoal may be given. Gastric lavage is also not generally recommended as patients will generally do well with appropriate treatment.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Perform early in patients with severe intoxication (seizures, dysrhythmias, coma or respiratory depression not responsive to naloxone).
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) Naloxone is the specific antidote and is indicated for respiratory or CNS depression in the setting of opioid toxicity. It is an opioid antagonist. Naloxone can be given intravenously, intermuscularly, intranasally or nebulized. The dose is 0.4 to 2 mg IV. Dose may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg. Very high doses of naloxone may be necessary in propoxyphene overdoses. The duration of effect of naloxone is 1 to 2 hours. If the patient has prolonged effects, a naloxone infusion (1 to 2 mg/hr) may be necessary. Patients should be observed at least 3 to 4 hours after the last dose of naloxone to ensure that symptoms do not recur. Naloxone can potentiate withdrawal in opioid-dependent patients. Opioid withdrawal is not life threatening but is extremely uncomfortable for the patient.
    F) RESPIRATORY ARREST
    1) Respiratory depression is common and can be treated with opioid antagonists OR intubation and mechanical ventilation (see antidote treatment above).
    G) COMA
    1) Perform orotracheal intubation to protect airway if not responsive to naloxone. Consider other causes of altered mental status.
    H) DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) Sodium channel blockade with resultant QRS prolongation can occur in patients with propoxyphene intoxication. Treatment includes administering sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 mEq/kg) until the interval narrows (target arterial pH 7.45 to 7.55). Although unproven, lidocaine may be used for patients who do not respond to bicarbonate. Naloxone is not effective in the treatment of propoxyphene-induced dysrhythmias.
    I) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare but may be a result of hypoxia or due to properties of the drug. Treatment includes intravenous benzodiazepines; propofol or barbiturates should be used for seizures not controlled with benzodiazepines.
    J) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Treat with initial normal saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then if necessary, adrenergic vasopressors may be administered to raise mean arterial pressure.
    K) BRADYCARDIA
    1) Place the patient on cardiac monitor. Correct hypothermia, if present prior to initiating other treatment for bradycardia. Do not treat sinus bradycardia unless patient is symptomatic. Follow ACLS protocol including the use of atropine, epinephrine and, if necessary, external or internal cardiac pacing.
    L) HYPOTHERMIA
    1) Monitor core temperature with rectal or bladder probe. Initiate external rewarming with warm blankets, IV fluids and warm humidified oxygen until temperature greater than 32 degrees Celsius. For severe hypothermia, consider active rewarming; in very severe cases associated with cardiac arrest, perform rewarming with cardiopulmonary bypass.
    M) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of large volume of distribution for propoxyphene.
    N) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME MANAGEMENT: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above the therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a healthcare professional if they have received a higher than therapeutic dose, especially if they are opioid naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions or children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4-6 hours, as peak plasma levels and thus symptoms will likely develop within this time period.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with significant persistent CNS depression should be admitted to the hospital. Patients needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as they may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, or delirium or those needing a naloxone infusion or intubated patients should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    O) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Other causes of altered mental status, such as hypoxia or hypoglycemia, must be ruled out. CNS depression may persist for one or two days due to the long half-life of norpropoxyphene.
    P) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Propoxyphene is metabolized by the liver and eliminated in the urine. It has a large volume of distribution. Half-life of propoxyphene is 6 to 12 hours and of norpropoxyphene (active metabolite) is 30 to 36 hours
    Q) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) ONSET: of toxicity is usually within 30 to 60 minutes of ingestion.
    R) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) CNS infection, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ethanol/benzodiazepine/barbiturate, tricyclic antidepressant, antipsychotic or clonidine intoxication, hypoglycemia, hypoxia.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: In adults, ingestion of 10 mg/kg generally causes toxicity; severe toxicity with survival has been reported with ingestions of 6500 to 9000 mg. Some tolerance develops with chronic use/abuse. Adult fatalities have been reported after ingestions of 600 mg to more than 5000 mg. Ingestion of 20 mg/kg is considered potentially lethal. There is no established toxic dose for children.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Propoxyphene hydrochloride 65 mg orally every 4 hours as needed; MAX 390 mg/day; propoxyphene napsylate: 100 mg orally every 4 hours as needed; MAX 600 mg/day. PEDIATRIC: There is no pediatric dosing available for this drug.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Propoxyphene is a synthetic opioid used for the treatment of pain. Propoxyphene is sold in combination with acetaminophen or aspirin and as a single agent and is abused for euphoric effects. WITHDRAWAL FROM MARKET: In November 2010, the US FDA has recommended the removal of propoxyphene (brand name and generic formulations) from the market due to the risk of serious toxicity to the heart at therapeutic doses. Results of a study showed that therapeutic doses of propoxyphene produced alterations in ECG findings, including prolonged PR interval, widened QRS complex and prolonged QT interval, which may increase the risk for serious abnormal heart rhythms.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Propoxyphene binds Mu opioid receptors producing analgesia, sedation, euphoria, decreased GI motility, and pruritus. Propoxyphene is formulated to be taken orally. Absorption may be slowed due to decreased gastric motility.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Abusers may inject, snort or smoke as these routes achieve high serum levels rapidly, producing euphoria quickly. This puts them especially at risk for severe toxicity. Toxicology is an extension of the pharmacology (opioid effects). Norpropoxpyhene is the active metabolite of the drug. Unlike other opioids, both propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene have sodium channel blocking properties similar to type 1A antidysrhythmics. Cardiac sodium channel antagonism and CNS stimulation can cause cardiac dysrhythmias and seizures.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Propoxyphene exposures and severe toxicity were common in the past. However, as the use of propoxyphene has decreased, the frequency of severe exposures is decreasing.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, and vomiting may occur.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, and vomiting may occur. Pinpoint pupils, mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, hypotension, bradycardia, metabolic or respiratory acidosis, wide QRS complexes, ventricular dysrhythmias, or acute lung injury may develop. Patients may also be hypothermic. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia or from drug effect. Death may result from any of these complications.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) HYPOTHERMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild hypothermia (temperature less than 35 degrees C/95 degrees F but greater than 32 degrees C/88 degrees F) is common (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    B) HYPERTHERMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperthermia has also been reported (Heaney, 1983; Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPOTENSION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension is common in patients who are comatose (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Baselt, 1982).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HEART RATE: Tachycardia or bradycardia may occur (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Stork et al, 1995). Hypotension may not be accompanied by compensatory tachycardia (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) MIOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Miosis pupils are characteristic (Matthew & Lawson, 1979; Hantson et al, 1995).
    B) MYDRIASIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mydriasis has also been observed, particularly in patients who are hypoxic or who have had seizures (Mauer et al, 1975; Pond et al, 1982; Elonen & Neuvonen, 1984).
    C) BLURRED VISION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Blurred vision may occur.
    D) OPTIC ATROPHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Optic atrophy and blindness with disc edema and eventual pallor were noted in a patient with coma, apnea, and transient cardiac arrest following an overdose of propoxyphene in combination with aspirin and phenacetin (Weiss, 1982).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) RECOMMENDED WITHDRAWAL FROM MARKET: In November 2010, the US FDA has recommended the removal of propoxyphene (brand name and generic formulations) from the market due to the risk of serious toxicity to the heart at therapeutic doses. Results of a study showed that therapeutic doses of propoxyphene produced alterations in ECG findings, including prolonged PR interval, widened QRS complex and prolonged QT interval, which may increase the risk for serious abnormal heart rhythms (US Food and Drug Administration, 2010).
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Sinus tachycardia and sinus bradycardia may be noted (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    b) Nodal tachycardia has been reported (Krantz et al, 1986).
    C) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Ventricular extrasystoles, bigeminy, or ventricular tachycardia may be seen (McCarthy & Keenan, 1964; Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Mauer et al, 1975; Krantz et al, 1986).
    b) Ventricular fibrillation can occur (Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976).
    c) Pulseless idioventricular rhythm has been reported (Gary et al, 1968; Warren et al, 1974).
    d) Asystole may be noted (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    D) ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) First degree AV block may occur (Starkey & Larson, 1978) (Elonen & Neuvonen, 1984; Heaney, 1983).
    b) Third degree AV block has occurred (Krantz et al, 1986; Hantson et al, 1995).
    E) BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Right and left bundle branch blocks have been reported (Qureshi, 1964; Starkey & Lawson, 1978; Heaney, 1983).
    F) WIDE QRS COMPLEX
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Prolongation of the QRS interval may occur (Barraclough & Lowe, 1982; Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976; Whitcomb et al, 1989; Stork et al, 1995).
    b) A significantly prolonged QRS complex was observed in patients with co-proxamol (paracetamol 325 mg and dextropropoxyphene 32.5 mg) overdose (Afshari et al, 2005).
    G) PROLONGED QT INTERVAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Prolongation of the QTc interval may be noted (Elonen & Neuvonen, 1984; Stork et al, 1995).
    H) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities have been reported (Bogartz & Miller, 1971).
    I) HEART FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vagally mediated hypotension and bradycardia with a low central venous pressure may occur early in the course of poisoning (Strom, 1989).
    b) Hypotension with elevated central venous pulmonary artery pressures and decreased cardiac output may occur in severely poisoned patients (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Krantz et al, 1985; Krantz et al, 1986).
    c) Cardiovascular failure may occur in the absence of arrhythmias or ECG abnormalities (Strom, 1989).
    d) ONSET: Cardiovascular complications may not occur until late in the course of poisoning (Whitcomb et al, 1989; Strom, 1989).
    J) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension is common in patients who are comatose (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Baselt, 1982; Hantson et al, 1995).
    K) INJECTION SITE REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) VENOUS INJECTION: Propoxyphene can cause severe local injury in veins and soft tissue when injected intravenously. Use by this route may result in thrombophlebitis with severe sclerosis, as well as abscesses and cellulitis (Tennant, 1973).
    b) ARTERIAL INJECTION: The intra-arterial injection of propoxyphene has resulted in limb ischemia and gangrene requiring partial amputation of digits (Pearlman et al, 1970).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory depression is common, leading to respiratory acidosis, hypoxia, and cyanosis (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Stork et al, 1995; Hantson et al, 1995).
    b) Onset may be rapid, within 30 minutes to one hour after ingestion (Stork et al, 1995).
    B) PNEUMONITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pulmonary infiltrates frequently occur on chest x-rays of severely poisoned patients (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Krantz et al, 1986).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute lung injury with hypoxia, cyanosis, hypercarbia, rales, and frothy or bloody pulmonary secretions may occur following oral or intravenous overdose (Bogartz & Miller, 1971; Tennant, 1973; Young, 1972).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Onset of symptoms may occur as early as 1/2 hour after ingestion. Symptoms include drowsiness, confusion, dizziness, stupor, or coma.
    B) CENTRAL STIMULANT ADVERSE REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Anxiety, restlessness, tremors, hyperreflexia and clonus may occur with high therapeutic doses (Mattson et al, 1969; Woody et al, 1980).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anxiety, restlessness, tremors, hyperreflexia and clonus may occur with acute overdose (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Billig, 1968).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures may occur after overdose (Stork et al, 1995) or chronic abuse (Ng & Alvear, 1993).
    b) INCIDENCE: In a series of 73 patients with a history of dextropropoxyphene abuse, 53% reported generalized seizures while intoxicated (Ng & Alvear, 1993).
    D) MOOD SWINGS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Euphoria and dysphoria may be seen with therapeutic doses.
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Euphoria and dysphoria may be seen with toxic doses. Propoxyphene abusers report that benzodiazepines enhance the euphoria of propoxyphene.
    E) DYSKINESIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Involuntary flailing, and hemiballismic and athetoid movements have been reported (Billig, 1968).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting may occur with therapeutic doses.
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea and vomiting may occur toxic doses.
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Constipation may develop.
    C) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Abdominal pain may develop.
    D) DISORDER OF RECTUM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anorectal ulceration has been reported due to abuse of dextropropoxyphene and acetaminophen suppositories (Fenzy & Bogomoletz, 1987).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CHOLESTATIC HEPATITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hepatotoxicity that mimics biliary tract disease has occurred. Jaundice, upper abdominal pain, and rigors were reported in 3 patients after therapeutic doses of propoxyphene (Bassendine et al, 1986).
    b) Hepatomegaly, cholestatic jaundice, and cholestasis with portal tract inflammation on biopsy developed in 9 patients taking therapeutic doses of propoxyphene (Rosenberg et al, 1993).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RESPIRATORY ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory acidosis may result from decreased respirations or acute lung injury.
    B) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Metabolic acidosis may occur secondary to hypoxia, shock or seizures (Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976; Stork et al, 1995).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hemolytic anemia with increased indirect serum bilirubin and hemoglobinuria has been reported following intravenous use of propoxyphene (Tennant, 1973).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BULLOUS ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pressure point erythema, blisters, and skin necrosis may be noted in patients who have been deeply comatose.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis may occur following acute overdose (Pond et al, 1982).
    B) DRUG-INDUCED MYOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Myopathy with weakness, fatigue, and muscle pain was reported in a patient who was taking 600 to 2600 mg/day of propoxyphene napsylate.
    1) Serum creatine-kinase levels were markedly elevated (1,500 to 10,600 units), probably representing induction of mild rhabdomyolysis. A muscle biopsy was normal.
    2) Propoxyphene napsylate is a potentially myotoxic drug (Dalakas, 1986).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Propoxyphene is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. A neonatal withdrawal syndrome has been reported in infants born to mothers taking high daily doses of propoxyphene.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) CONGENITAL ANOMALY
    1) Propoxyphene administration to a pregnant woman may result in any of the following: Pierre-Robin syndrome or arthrogryposis (Barrow & Sonder, 1971), widely spaced cranial sutures, beaked nose, micrognathia, bifid uvula, and long, overlapping fourth and fifth left toes (Golden et al, 1982), prune perineum syndrome (Williams et al, 1983), absent forearm and fingers, hypoplastic femur, finger and toe syndactylism, omphalocele, diaphragm defect, sternal cleft, congenital heart disease, dysplastic hips (Ringrose, 1972), and anophthalmia (Golden & Perman, 1980).
    B) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) A large surveillance study did not find an excess of malformations in pregnant women taking propoxyphene (Heinonen et al, 1970).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS, RABBITS: Animal studies did not result in teratogenic effects in offspring of pregnant rats and rabbits that received propoxyphene doses approximately 10-fold and 4-fold the maximum recommended human dose during organogenesis, respectively (Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009).
    2) HAMSTER: POSITIVE STUDIES: Propoxyphene has been reported to be teratogenic in the hamster when given in subQ doses exceeding 200 mg/kg. Malformations included cranioschisis, exencephaly, micro- or anophthalmia, and spina bifida (Geber & Schramm, 1975).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Propoxyphene is classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009)
    B) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Acetaminophen, propoxyphene, and norpropoxyphene, a major metabolite, are known to cross the placental barrier, and as a result infants whose mothers have taken opiates during pregnancy may experience withdrawal symptoms or exhibit respiratory depression (Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009).
    C) WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME
    1) Infants born to mothers taking high doses of propoxyphene (300 mg or more daily) have experienced neonatal withdrawal syndrome (Tyson, 1974; Klein et al, 1975; Quillian & Dunn, 1976; Ente & Mehra, 1978; Golden et al, 1982; Briggs et al, 1998).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Acetaminophen, propoxyphene, and norpropoxyphene, a major metabolite, are excreted in breast milk. In a study with 6 women and their primarily breastfed infants, it was determined that an infant receives approximately 2% of the maternal weight adjusted dose. Since norpropoxyphene is renally excreted, and renal clearance is lower in neonates than adults, the long-term use of maternal propoxyphene may result in norpoxyphene accumulation in a breastfed infant. Caution is suggested. Breastfed infants need to be observed for signs of excessive CNS depression (ie, poor feeding, sedation, somnolence or respiratory depression) (Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009).
    2) Small amounts of propoxyphene and twice as much of its norpropoxyphene metabolite are excreted into breast milk (Kunka et al, 1984; Kunka et al, 1985).
    3) CASE REPORT: The concentration of propoxyphene in the breast milk of a nursing mother who took an overdose was 50% that of the plasma (Catz & Giacoia, 1972; Briggs et al, 1998).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) SEMEN ABNORMAL
    1) SPERM: Propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene inhibit sperm motility (Zaman et al, 1982).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) As combination products are common, measure serum salicylate and acetaminophen concentrations. Propoxyphene can delay gastric motility and thus delay peak acetaminophen or aspirin concentrations. However, the clinical significance of this is unclear.
    C) Propoxyphene plasma concentrations are not clinically useful or readily available. Screening urine toxicology immunoassays for opioids will likely not detect propoxyphene. No other specific lab work is needed in most patients but may be helpful in ruling out other causes of altered mental status if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    D) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in patients with moderate to severe toxicity with propoxyphene.
    E) Consider head CT and lumbar puncture to rule out intracranial mass, bleeding or infection.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor arterial or venous blood gases or oxygen saturation.
    2) ARTERIAL AND CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE MONITORING should be considered in patients with cardiovascular instability.
    B) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) THERAPEUTIC BLOOD LEVEL is less than 0.2 mcg/mL.
    2) Following CHRONIC USE, serum norpropoxyphene exceeds propoxyphene; if the opposite occurs, acute exposure should be suspected (Hartmann et al, 1988).
    3) PEAK PLASMA LEVELS range from 0.02 to 0.15 mcg/mL following a 65 mg dose of propoxyphene HCl (Wolen et al, 1971b; Rodda et al, 1971; Gram et al, 1979) and from 0.09 and 0.5 mcg/mL following a 130 mg dose (Verebely & Inturrisi, 1974; Gram et al, 1979; Inturrisi et al, 1982) Kankkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    a) Levels may be slightly higher following repeated dosing (Wolen et al, 1971b; Inturrisi et al, 1982), probably due to the ability of propoxyphene to inhibit its own metabolism (Peterson et al, 1979; Abernathy et al, 1982).
    b) Because of high first pass metabolism and the longer half-life of norpropoxyphene than propoxyphene, plasma concentrations of norpropoxyphene are usually greater than propoxyphene (Gram et al, 1979).
    c) Propoxyphene and d-propoxyphene levels are greater and norpropoxyphene concentrations are less in patients with cirrhosis (Giacomini et al, 1980).
    d) In 12 patients with cardiovascular failure due to propoxyphene overdose, initial plasma propoxyphene concentrations ranged from 0.7 to 2 mcg/mL and neither the propoxyphene or the propoxyphene plus norpropoxyphene concentration correlated with the clinical severity (Krantz et al, 1986).
    e) Mean postmortem blood propoxyphene concentration in suicide cases were reported to be 4.8 (greater than or equal to 3.6 mcg/mL) when ethanol was also ingested and 7.2 (greater than or equal to 3.9 mcg/mL) when ingested alone (Whittington & Barclay, 1981).
    1) Since propoxyphene is often taken with other drugs, drug concentrations in the blood must be interpreted in the context of the identification and quantitation of all agents ingested (Buckley & Vale, 1984).
    f) Blood propoxyphene and norporpoxyphene concentrations ranged from less than 0.1 to more than 20 mcg/mL in cases of intentional propoxyphene exposure (Finkle et al, 1976; Finkle et al, 1981; Finkle, 1984).
    g) Although one study found a rough correlation between plasma propoxyphene concentration and clinical severity (Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976), there is considerable overlap between blood concentrations seen with chronic therapeutic doses, nonfatal poisoning, and fatal poisoning (Buckley & Vale, 1984).
    h) Hence, blood levels are not helpful in predicting the severity of poisoning.
    i) In contrast to therapeutic dosing, the propoxyphene concentration is often higher than the norpropoxyphene concentration following acute poisoning (Caplan et al, 1977) Whittington & Barcley, 1981; (Finkle et al, 1981).
    j) Hence, the ratio of propoxyphene to norpropoxyphene may be helpful in distinguishing acute from chronic overdosage.
    k) Since propoxyphene liver concentrations are greater than those in serum, liver failure with hepatocellular autolysis may result in post-mortem blood propoxyphene concentrations which are higher than pre-mortem levels (Bednarczyk et al, 1981).
    4) Monitor serum electrolytes, glucose, and ECG in patients with CNS depression, hypotension, seizures, dysrhythmias, or respiratory abnormalities.

Methods

    A) SAMPLING
    1) BEST SAMPLE: While propoxyphene and its norpropoxyphene metabolite may be identified in gastric contents and blood, urine seems to be the optimal fluid for screening. These drugs can be qualitatively measured.
    B) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) Methods for the quantitative analysis of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene include:
    2) Ultraviolet spectrophotometry (McBay et al, 1974).
    3) Liquid chromatography (Angelo et al, 1985; Kunka et al, 1985; Rop et al, 1993).
    4) Mass fragmentography with mass spectrometry or a nitrogen sensitive detector (Wolen et al, 1975).
    5) Gas chromatography (Angelo & Christensen, 1977; Gram et al, 1979; Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    6) A semiquantitative EMIT(R) homogeneous enzyme immunoassay is available for urine. The detection limit (sensitivity) is 2.0 mcg/mL for propoxyphene.
    C) OTHER
    1) ACID-BASE STATUS: Since propoxyphene is a weak base, the urinary excretion of propoxyphene, and to some extent norpropoxyphene, is highly dependent on the pH of urine (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    2) Hence, the urine pH should be taken into consideration when evaluating urine drug testing.
    3) Since excretion is markedly decreased in alkaline urine (and increased in acid urine), a false negative test may result when the urine pH is high (ie, greater than or equal to 6).
    4) This factor, along with decreased renal blood flow, may explain why qualitative urine analysis may initially be negative in severely poisoned patients (Krantz et al, 1986).
    5) If propoxyphene poisoning is clinically suspected, a negative analysis should be repeated.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) SUMMARY: Patients with significant persistent CNS depression should be admitted to the hospital. Patients needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as they may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, or delirium or those needing a naloxone infusion or intubated patients should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    B) Symptomatic patients should be admitted to intensive care unit and closely monitored for 24 hours or until persistently alert, and vital signs and ECG have returned to normal or baseline.
    1) Sudden unpredictable deterioration may occur for up to 24 hours (Young, 1983; Segest, 1987).
    2) Relaxation of intensive monitoring may occur 8 to 12 hours after end of coma.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above the therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a healthcare professional if they have received a higher than therapeutic dose, especially if they are opioid naive.
    B) Patients who remain asymptomatic and have normal vital signs and ECG after a 6 to 8 hour observation period may be discharged. Patients who have ingested sustained-released preparations should be observed for the longer period of time.
    C) Patients should be evaluated and treated for possible coingestants prior to discharge.
    D) The passage of a charcoal stool prior to discharge should ensure that subsequent deterioration will not occur.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    B) Consultation with a cardiologist or internist skilled at invasive hemodynamic monitoring and pharmacological and mechanical cardiovascular therapy is advisable for patients with dysrhythmias or hypotension.
    C) Consultation with a psychiatrist, psychiatric therapist, or counselor is advisable prior to the discharge of any patient with an intentional overdose.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with deliberate ingestions or children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4-6 hours, as peak plasma levels and thus symptoms will likely develop within this time period.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) As combination products are common, measure serum salicylate and acetaminophen concentrations. Propoxyphene can delay gastric motility and thus delay peak acetaminophen or aspirin concentrations. However, the clinical significance of this is unclear.
    C) Propoxyphene plasma concentrations are not clinically useful or readily available. Screening urine toxicology immunoassays for opioids will likely not detect propoxyphene. No other specific lab work is needed in most patients but may be helpful in ruling out other causes of altered mental status if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    D) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in patients with moderate to severe toxicity with propoxyphene.
    E) Consider head CT and lumbar puncture to rule out intracranial mass, bleeding or infection.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) PREHOSPITAL: GI decontamination should generally be avoided because of the risk of CNS depression or seizures and subsequent aspiration.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Consider decontamination if a patient presents shortly after an oral ingestion overdose and is not manifesting symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients that are manifesting signs of toxicity as they are at risk of coma or seizures and aspiration. If the airway is protected with orotracheal intubation, charcoal may be given. Gastric lavage is also not generally recommended as patients will generally do well with appropriate treatment.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Activated charcoal effectively adsorbs propoxyphene in vitro; 5 grams of charcoal can adsorb 99% of a 320 mg (approximately equal to 10 tablets) dose and 70% of a 960 mg (approximately equal to 30 tablets) dose (Corby & Decker, 1968). At a charcoal to drug ratio of 10:1, 99% of propoxyphene is adsorbed to charcoal (Chernish, 1972).
    2) Activated charcoal prevents the absorption of propoxyphene in vivo; 4 grams of charcoal reduced the absorption of a 130 mg dose of drug by 50% (Chernish, 1972) and 50 grams of charcoal reduced the absorption of an identical dose of propoxyphene by 97% to 99% (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    3) The above data suggest that even when a large overdose of propoxyphene is ingested, a 50 gram dose of activated charcoal can adsorb 90% of the drug ingested (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    4) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    5) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) A study in human volunteers demonstrated enhanced elimination with multiple doses of activated charcoal (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985); however it has never been shown to affect patient outcome and routine use is NOT recommended.
    a) When given in repeated doses (50 grams followed by 12.5 grams every 6 hours for 48 hours) starting 6 hours after the ingestion of 130 mg propoxyphene HCl (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985):
    1) Activated charcoal significantly shortened the terminal half-life of propoxyphene from a mean of 31.1 hours to 21.2 hours.
    2) The same was true of norpropoxyphene; the mean half-life dropping from 34.4 hours to 19.8 hours.
    2) Multiple dose activated charcoal may be considered in patients with life threatening intoxication.
    a) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dose not established. After an initial dose of 50 to 100 grams of activated charcoal, subsequent doses may be administered every 1, 2 or 4 hours at a dose equivalent to 12.5 grams/hour (Vale et al, 1999), do not exceed: 0.5 g/kg charcoal every 2 hours (Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013; Mauro et al, 1994). There is some evidence that smaller more frequent doses are more effective at enhancing drug elimination than larger less frequent doses (Park et al, 1983; Ilkhanipour et al, 1992). PEDIATRIC DOSE: Optimal dose not established. After an initial dose of 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) (Chyka & Seger, 1997), subsequent doses may be administered every 1, 2 or 4 hours (Vale et al, 1999) in a dose equivalent to 6.25 grams/hour in children 1 to 12 years old.
    2) Activated charcoal should be continued until the patient's clinical and laboratory parameters, including drug concentrations if available, are improving (Vale et al, 1999). The patient should be frequently assessed for the ability to protect the airway and evidence of decreased peristalsis or intestinal obstruction.
    3) Use of cathartics has not been shown to increase drug elimination and may increase the likelihood of vomiting. Routine coadministration of a cathartic is NOT recommended (Vale et al, 1999).
    4) AGENTS AMENABLE TO MDAC THERAPY: The following properties of a drug that are likely to allow MDAC therapy to be effective include: small volume of distribution, low protein binding, prolonged half-life, low intrinsic clearance, and a nonionized state at physiologic pH (Chyka, 1995; Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013).
    5) Vomiting is a common adverse effect; antiemetics may be necessary.
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Absolute contraindications include an unprotected airway, intestinal obstruction, a gastrointestinal tract that is not intact and agents that may increase the risk of aspiration (eg, hydrocarbons). Relative contraindications include decreased peristalsis (eg, decreased bowel sounds, abdominal distention, ileus, severe constipation) (Vale et al, 1999; Mauro et al, 1994).
    7) COMPLICATIONS: Include constipation, intestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, appendicitis, charcoal bezoars, and aspiration which may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome or bronchiolitis obliterans (Ghannoum & Gosselin, 2013; Ray et al, 1988; Atkinson et al, 1992; Gomez et al, 1994; Mizutani et al, 1991; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Mina et al, 2002; Harsch, 1986; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    2) As combination products are common, measure serum salicylate and acetaminophen concentrations. Propoxyphene can delay gastric motility and thus delay peak acetaminophen or aspirin concentrations. However, the clinical significance of this is unclear.
    3) Propoxyphene plasma concentrations are not clinically useful or readily available. Screening urine toxicology immunoassays for opioids will likely not detect propoxyphene. No other specific lab work is needed in most patients but may be helpful in ruling out other causes of altered mental status if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    4) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in patients with moderate to severe toxicity with propoxyphene.
    5) Consider head CT and lumbar puncture to rule out intracranial mass, bleeding or infection.
    B) NALOXONE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) NALOXONE has been shown to antagonize the convulsive effects of propoxyphene in animals (Chapman & Walaszek, 1962; Fuit et al, 1966).
    a) Its efficacy in terminating seizures in cases of human poisoning is inconclusive. Since the use of naloxone avoids the potential additive respiratory depressant effects of anticonvulsants, naloxone use is a reasonable first choice (Lovejoy et al, 1974).
    b) DOSE
    1) INITIAL DOSE: ADULTS AND CHILD: An initial dose of 0.4 mg to 2 mg may be administered intravenously. Initial dose may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes to obtain desired degree of respiratory function.
    2) LARGER DOSES: There is evidence that larger than usual doses of naloxone may be required to reverse propoxyphene toxicity (Moore et al, 1980).
    3) NO EFFECT: If no response is observed after 10 mg has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced toxicity should be questioned.
    c) Relatively high doses of naloxone may be necessary to reverse the CNS toxicity of propoxyphene (Neil & Terenins, 1981, Moore et al, 1980).
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    3) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    4) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    5) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    6) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    7) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    D) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) HYPOTENSION secondary to opioid effects (i.e., due to hypoxia and respiratory acidosis resulting from coma with respiratory depression) may respond to naloxone (Hantson et al, 1995). See doses above.
    2) Hypotension due to direct cardiovascular effects of propoxyphene is unlikely to respond to naloxone (Starkley & Lawson, 1978; Krantz et al, 1989; (Barraclough & Lowe, 1982; Strom et al, 1985b).
    a) Active circulatory support is often necessary. Evaluation of cardiac function by Doppler ultrasound may be helpful (Lang-Jensen et al, 1988).
    b) Hemodynamic monitoring by central venous or pulmonary artery catheterization may be necessary (Strom, 1989).
    1) If the systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mmHg and the central venous pressure is less than 10 mmHg, administer isotonic saline, (initial dose 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram).
    2) If the systolic blood pressure is less than 90 mmHg and the central venous pressure is greater than 10 mmHg, begin dopamine or dobutamine.
    3) DOPAMINE
    a) DOPAMINE
    1) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    2) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) A dose dependent rise in systolic blood pressure and urine output and a fall in central venous pressure were noted in 12 patients with cardiovascular failure given dopamine infusions of 2 to 17 micrograms/kilogram/minute (Krantz et al, 1986).
    c) The beneficial hemodynamic effects of fluid or dopamine resuscitation may enhance the elimination of propoxyphene, an effect not produced by naloxone (Strom, 1989; Pederson et al, 1991).
    4) Isoproterenol (a non-selective beta agonist), prenalterol (a selective beta-1 agonist), and cardiac pacing are not as effective as dopamine in the treatment of cardiovascular failure (Haggmark et al, 1987; Strom et al, 1985b; Strom et al, 1985c).
    5) Cardiac pacing may be of value if combined with inotropic stimulation (i.e., dopamine) in cases of severe poisoning (Strom, 1989).
    6) Although not previously reported in this setting, the use of mechanical cardiovascular support systems such as intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation and cardiopulmonary bypass pumping, should be considered in patients with hemodynamic instability unresponsive to other measures.
    E) WIDE QRS COMPLEX
    1) Naloxone is unlikely to reverse propoxyphene induced dysrhythmias (Holland & Steinberg, 1979; Barraclough & Lowe, 1982; Strom et al, 1985b; Whitcomb et al, 1989).
    2) It is helpful to correct hypoxia and acid-base abnormalities.
    3) Dysrhythmias and conduction abnormalities often resolve with time and without specific treatment (Starkley & Lawson, 1978; (Barraclough & Lowe, 1982; Heaney, 1983; Elonen & Neuvonen, 1984).
    4) Although dysrhythmias and cardiac conduction abnormalities are likely to respond to conventional agents, treatment may not be necessary unless circulatory failure is also present.
    a) In one series, 6 patients who developed asystole were resuscitated and discharged without sequelae (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    5) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) Propoxyphene-induced QRS widening and dysrhythmias may respond to intravenous bicarbonate therapy. Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram bolus as needed to achieve a pH of 7.45 to 7.55.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman sustained a cardiac arrest with a wide complex tachycardia after ingesting 100 propoxyphene (65 mg) tablets (Stork et al, 1995). Acetaminophen, codeine, naproxen and fluoxetine may also have been ingested.
    1) She was treated with intubation, CPR, atropine, epinephrine, naloxone, diazepam, dopamine and norepinephrine and blood pressure improved to 40 mm Hg but the dysrhythmia continued. She converted to normal sinus rhythm with narrow QRS complexes after receiving 200 mEq sodium bicarbonate and blood pressure rose to 94/56.
    6) BRADYCARDIA
    a) Evaluate for hypoxia. Administer oxygen and naloxone and manage airway as clinically indicated.
    b) ATROPINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    a) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    7) LIDOCAINE
    a) Ventricular tachydysrhythmias can be successfully treated with lidocaine (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984; Whitcomb et al, 1989).
    b) Lidocaine is also effective in reversing propoxyphene induced QRS prolongation (Whitcomb et al, 1989). It appears that lidocaine competes with propoxyphene in blocking the inward sodium current in cardiac conducting cells. Because of differing binding kinetics, a paradoxical decline in block occurs when both agents are present.
    c) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    e) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    8) NOT RECOMMENDED
    a) Quinidine, disopyramide, and procainamide are contraindicated as their effects on myocardial conduction are similar to that of other sodium channel blockers including propoxyphene.
    F) AT RISK - FINDING
    1) The toxicities of concurrently ingested drugs such as compounds of propoxyphene and aspirin or acetaminophen must also be recognized and promptly treated.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) The use of morphine should be avoided.
    2) Naloxone alone will not reverse this complication.
    3) If the blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rhythm are within normal limits, positive pressure ventilation with PEEP is the treatment of choice.
    4) In patients who are hypotensive (systolic BP less than 90 mmHg) or who have a central venous pressure greater than 10 mmHg, administer dopamine or dobutamine (Krantz et al, 1986; Strom, 1989).
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    b) DOPAMINE
    1) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    2) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    c) Higher than usual doses of dopamine may be necessary (Krantz et al, 1986).
    H) SEROTONIN SYNDROME
    1) Propoxyphene is a weak serotonin re-uptake inhibitor which can theoretically produce serotonin syndrome and has been suggested in the literature to have produced serotonin toxicity (Gillman, 2005).
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of therapy. Cyproheptadine, a 5-HT antagonist, is also commonly used. Severe cases have been managed with benzodiazepine sedation and neuromuscular paralysis with non-depolarizing agents(Claassen & Gelissen, 2005).
    3) HYPERTHERMIA
    a) Control agitation and muscle activity. Undress patient and enhance evaporative heat loss by keeping skin damp and using cooling fans.
    b) MUSCLE ACTIVITY: Benzodiazepines are the drug of choice to control agitation and muscle activity. DIAZEPAM: ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, monitor for respiratory depression and need for intubation. CHILD: 0.25 mg/kg IV every 5 to 10 minutes; monitor for respiratory depression and need for intubation.
    c) Non-depolarizing paralytics may be used in severe cases.
    4) CYPROHEPTADINE
    a) Cyproheptadine is a non-specific 5-HT antagonist that has been shown to block development of serotonin syndrome in animals (Sternbach, 1991). Cyproheptadine has been used in the treatment of serotonin syndrome (Mills, 1997; Goldberg & Huk, 1992). There are no controlled human trials substantiating its efficacy.
    b) ADULT: 12 mg initially followed by 2 mg every 2 hours if symptoms persist, up to a maximum of 32 mg in 24 hours. Maintenance dose 8 mg orally repeated every 6 hours (Boyer & Shannon, 2005).
    c) CHILD: 0.25 mg/kg/day divided every 6 hours, maximum dose 12 mg/day (Mills, 1997).
    5) HYPERTENSION
    a) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic intervention is usually not necessary.
    6) HYPOTENSION
    a) Administer 10 to 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline bolus and place patient supine. Further fluid therapy should be guided by central venous pressure or right heart catheterization to avoid volume overload.
    b) Pressor agents with dopaminergic effects may theoretically worsen serotonin syndrome and should be used with caution. Direct acting agents (norepinephrine, epinephrine, phentolamine) are theoretically preferred.
    c) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: Add 4 mL of 0.1% solution to 1000 mL of dextrose 5% in water to produce 4 mcg/mL.
    2) INITIAL DOSE
    a) ADULT: 2 to 3 mL (8 to 12 mcg)/minute.
    b) ADULT or CHILD: 0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure.
    3) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    a) 0.5 to 1 mL (2 to 4 mcg)/minute.
    7) SEIZURES
    a) DIAZEPAM
    1) MAXIMUM RATE: Administer diazepam IV over 2 to 3 minutes (maximum rate: 5 mg/min).
    2) ADULT DIAZEPAM DOSE: 5 to 10 mg initially, repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed. Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after diazepam 30 milligrams.
    3) PEDIATRIC DIAZEPAM DOSE: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg, repeat every 5 minutes as needed. Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after diazepam 10 milligrams in children over 5 years or 5 milligrams in children under 5 years of age.
    4) RECTAL USE: If an intravenous line cannot be established, diazepam may be given per rectum (not FDA approved), or lorazepam may be given intramuscularly.
    b) LORAZEPAM
    1) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of IV administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Prod Info Ativan(R), 1991).
    2) ADULT LORAZEPAM DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV. Initial doses may be repeated in 10 to 15 minutes, if seizures persist (Prod Info ATIVAN(R) injection, 2003).
    3) PEDIATRIC LORAZEPAM DOSE: 0.1 mg/kg IV push (range: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg; maximum dose 4 mg); may repeat dose in 5 to 10 minutes if seizures continue. It has also been given rectally at the same dose in children with no IV access (Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008; Wheless, 2004; Qureshi et al, 2002; De Negri & Baglietto, 2001; Mitchell, 1996; Appleton, 1995; Giang & McBride, 1988).
    c) RECURRING SEIZURES
    1) If seizures cannot be controlled with diazepam or recur, give phenobarbital or propofol.
    d) PHENOBARBITAL
    1) SERUM LEVEL MONITORING: Monitor serum levels over next 12 to 24 hours for maintenance of therapeutic levels (15 to 25 mcg/mL).
    2) ADULT PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 600 to 1200 mg of phenobarbital IV initially (10 to 20 mg/kg) diluted in 60 mL of 0.9% saline given at 25 to 50 mg/minute.
    3) ADULT PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Additional doses of 120 to 240 mg may be given every 20 minutes.
    4) MAXIMUM SAFE ADULT PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: No maximum safe dose has been established. Patients in status epilepticus have received as much as 100 mg/min until seizure control was achieved or a total dose of 10 mg/kg.
    5) PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 15 to 20 mg/kg of phenobarbital intravenously at a rate of 25 to 50 mg/min.
    6) PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 10 mg/kg may be given every 20 minutes.
    7) MAXIMUM SAFE PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: No maximum safe dose has been established. Children in status epilepticus have received doses of 30 to 120 mg/kg within 24 hours. Vasopressors and mechanical ventilation were needed in some patients receiving these doses.
    8) NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 20 to 30 mg/kg IV at a rate of no more than 1 mg/kg/min in patients with no preexisting phenobarbital serum levels.
    9) NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Repeat doses of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours may be given; adjust dosage to maintain serum levels of 20 to 40 mcg/mL.
    10) MAXIMUM SAFE NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: Doses of up to 20 mg/kg/min up to a total of 30 mg/kg have been tolerated in neonates.
    11) CAUTION: Adequacy of ventilation must be continuously monitored in children and adults. Intubation may be necessary with increased doses.
    8) CHLORPROMAZINE
    a) Chlorpromazine is a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist that has been used to treat cases of serotonin syndrome (Graham, 1997; Gillman, 1996). Controlled human trial documenting its efficacy are lacking.
    b) ADULT: 25 to 100 mg intramuscularly repeated in 1 hour if necessary.
    c) CHILD: 0.5 to 1 mg/kg repeated as needed every 6 to 12 hours not to exceed 2 mg/kg/day.
    9) NOT RECOMMENDED
    a) BROMOCRIPTINE: It has been used in the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome but is NOT RECOMMENDED in the treatment of serotonin syndrome as it has serotonergic effects (Gillman, 1997). In one case the use of bromocriptine was associated with a fatal outcome (Kline et al, 1989).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Due to the large volume of distribution, serum concentrations of propoxyphene are low. Only about 1% of an ingested dose is present in circulating plasma.
    2) Clinical reports have confirmed that dialysis is neither pharmacokinetically nor clinically effective in treating propoxyphene intoxication (Thamdrup et al, 1986; Wetli & Bednarczyk, 1980).
    3) Hemodialysis removes propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene at a rate of approximately 50% of the BUN clearance; hence, their clearances are about half of the blood flow rate (Mauer et al, 1975).
    a) In one patient, 124 mg of propoxyphene (6.9% of the dose ingested) was recovered in the dialysate over a period of 16 hours (Gary et al, 1968). Clearances ranged from 70 to 470 milliliters/minute (4 to 22 mg/hour).
    b) In another patient, hemodialysis, at a flow rate of 32 milliliters/minute, removed 9.6 mg of propoxyphene and 16.5 mg of norpropoxyphene (4% and 7% of the ingested dose, respectively) during a 6-hour period (Mauer et al, 1975).
    B) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    1) Peritoneal dialysis removes only small amounts of propoxyphene from the bloodstream (Karliner, 1967; Gary et al, 1968).
    2) In one patient, peritoneal dialysis removed only 16 mg of propoxyphene in 3 days (Gary et al, 1968). The clearance of propoxyphene by peritoneal dialysis was found to be 8.8 milliliters/minute.
    C) DIURESIS
    1) Forced diuresis and manipulation of the urine pH have not been shown to be useful in the treatment of propoxyphene poisoning.
    2) Forced diuresis using mannitol removed 96 mg (5% of the ingested dose) of the propoxyphene in 62 hours (Gary et al, 1968). The clearance averaged 28 milliliters/minute.
    3) The urinary clearance and excretion of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene depend on the urine pH and flow rate; they increase with decreasing urine pH (i.e., urinary acidification) and with increased urine flow (Karkkainen & Neuvonen, 1985).
    4) However, the cumulative excretion of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene even into acid urine accounted for less then 25% of the dose during the 72 hours.
    5) Forced diuresis and administration of acid (i.e., ammonium chloride) may be dangerous in patients prone to acute lung injury, respiratory acidosis, and hypoxia or shock with metabolic acidosis.
    D) PLASMAPHERESIS
    1) Plasmapheresis using an arterio-venous shunt and a membrane type plasma separator has been reported to be effective in improving the level of consciousness in 5 of 6 patients with propoxyphene intoxication (Thamdrup et al, 1986).
    2) The response was slow (96 hours) in one patient and initially transient in 3 patients. The patients with transient responses awakened during plasmapheresis but lapsed back into coma 12 hours later.
    3) Pharmacokinetic data to support the use of plasmapheresis were not provided and the time course of poisoning resolution was not different from that reported in patients not treated with plasmapheresis.
    4) Since the same effect (improved level of consciousness) can be achieved with naloxone, plasmapheresis cannot be recommended for this purpose.

Case Reports

    A) INFANT
    1) A 19-month-old woman presented with lethargy, rigidity, staring, and miotic pupils 40 minutes after ingesting an unknown amount of propoxyphene HCl. Shortly thereafter a generalized seizure was followed by respiratory arrest (Lovejoy et al, 1974).
    2) A 10-month-old woman developed stupor with labored respirations followed by grand mal seizures and coma 1 hour after ingesting an unknown amount of propoxyphene HCl (Mauer et al, 1975). She was apneic with a pulse of 40 but no detectable blood pressure. The pupils were fixed and dilated. Although initially resuscitated, she died 2 days later of anoxic encephalopathy.
    B) ADULT
    1) A 21-year-old man vomited, began staring, and had a seizure approximately 30 minutes after ingesting 27 mg/kg propoxyphene HCl. He was dead by the time he reached the hospital 5 to 10 minutes later. Acute lung injury was noted on postmortem examination (Tennant, 1973).
    2) A 17-year-old woman was found apneic and pulseless with an idioventricular rhythm (at a rate of 20) one hour after ingesting an estimated 32 mg/kg of propoxyphene HCl (Gary et al, 1968).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: In adults, ingestion of 10 mg/kg generally causes toxicity; severe toxicity with survival has been reported with ingestions of 6500 to 9000 mg. Some tolerance develops with chronic use/abuse. Adult fatalities have been reported after ingestions of 600 mg to more than 5000 mg. Ingestion of 20 mg/kg is considered potentially lethal. There is no established toxic dose for children.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Propoxyphene hydrochloride 65 mg orally every 4 hours as needed; MAX 390 mg/day; propoxyphene napsylate: 100 mg orally every 4 hours as needed; MAX 600 mg/day. PEDIATRIC: There is no pediatric dosing available for this drug.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) PROPOXYPHENE
    1) One propoxyphene hydrochloride 65 mg capsule every 4 hours orally. MAX DOSE: 6 capsules per day (Prod Info DARVON(R) oral capsules, 2006).
    B) PROPOXYPHENE AND ACETAMINOPHEN
    1) The usual dosage is 1 tablet (propoxyphene napsylate 100 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg OR propoxyphene napsylate 100 mg and acetaminophen 650 mg OR propoxyphene hydrochloride 65 mg and acetaminophen 650 mg) every 4 hours orally. MAX DOSE: 6 tablets per day (Prod Info propoxyphene HCl acetaminophen oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009) OR 2 tablets (propoxyphene napsylate 50 mg and acetaminophen 325 mg) ever 4 hours orally. MAX DOSE: 12 tablets per day (Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) Safety and efficacy of propoxyphene have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info propoxyphene HCl acetaminophen oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, 2009; Prod Info DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, 2009).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) The minimum toxic dose is roughly 10 mg per kg, and 20 mg per kg is considered potentially lethal (Strom, 1989).
    2) The smallest dose reported to cause intoxication in an adult with a mixed ingestion was 390 mg (Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976).
    3) The lowest fatal dose, in an adult with cardiac disease, was 600 mg (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) SUMMARY OF CASE REPORTS
    a) Death has been reported following doses of: 1,280 mg (McCarthy & Keenan, 1964), 1,800 mg (Bogartz & Miller, 1971), 3,520 mg (Bogartz & Miller, 1971), and 2300 mg (Karliner, 1967)
    2) SUMMARY OF CASE SERIES
    a) Sturner & Garriott (1973) reported deaths due to propoxyphene in 41 patients, an average of 5,120 mg as a single dose (Sturner & Garriott, 1973).
    b) Carson & Carson (1977) reviewed 30 cases of fatal poisoning due to propoxyphene hydrochloride. The range of dosage was 20 to 50 tablets as a single dose (1300 to 3250 mg).
    c) Deaths have been reported following ingestion of 900 to 1300 mg of propoxyphene alone, and 800 to 1000 mg when coingested with alcohol (Shannon & Lovejoy, 1982; Finkle et al, 1981; Finkle, 1984).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) The largest reported acute ingestion in an adult who survived is 9,000 mg (Sloth-Madsen et al, 1984).
    b) A 54-year-old female survived an acute ingestion of 6500 mg of propoxyphene hydrochloride, in addition to possibly ingesting acetaminophen with codeine, naprosyn, and fluoxetine. She experienced cardiopulmonary arrest, grand mal seizures and wide QRS complex on ECG (Stork et al, 1995).
    c) A dose of 32 to 35 mg/kg of propoxyphene hydrochloride has resulted in cardiac and respiratory arrest (Bogartz & Miller, 1971; Gary et al, 1968).
    d) In a retrospective review of 14 acute overdoses in Chinese patients, it was found that symptoms were relatively mild, with doses ranging from 150 to 2000 mg (median 750 mg). Drowsiness was reported in 2 patients who had ingested 1000 to 2000 mg. The author suggests that Chinese subjects may tolerate higher doses (possible genetic influences) as compared to Caucasians (Chan, 1996).
    2) CHRONIC
    a) Tolerance develops with repeated doses. Doses of 1000 to 2000 mg may be ingested or injected with minimal signs of poisoning in chronic propoxyphene users and heroin users (Miller et al, 1970; Tennant, 1973; Woody et al, 1980; D'Abadie & Lenton, 1984).
    b) A 30-year-old heroin user survived a 22.5 gram ingestion of dextropropoxyphene. Irregular sinus rhythm was evident on ECG (rate 110 beats/minute). No QRS complex widening and no QTc interval prolongation was noted. The patient was given several doses of naloxone and treated symptomatically. He was subsequently discharged 2 days after admission (Hantson et al, 1995).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Serum propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene levels are not useful in predicting the severity of poisoning or directing treatment.
    b) Blood propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene levels have ranged from less than 0.1 mcg/mL to more than 20 mcg/mL in cases of fatal poisoning (Finkle et al, 1976; Finkle et al, 1981; Finkle, 1984).
    c) Due to the development of tolerance and the effects of coingested agents, there is considerable overlap between therapeutic, toxic, and fatal blood concentrations (Buckley & Vale, 1984; Hartmann et al, 1988).
    d) Peak propoxyphene concentrations following therapeutic doses range from 0.02 to 0.5 mcg/mL (Wolen et al, 1971a; Wolen et al, 1971b; Rodda et al, 1971; Verebely & Inturrisi, 1974; Gram et al, 1979).
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) In one fatal case, necropsy reports revealed a whole blood propoxyphene level of 614 nanograms/milliliter and norpropoxyphene level of 1100 nanograms/milliliter, both within a therapeutic range. In a second fatal case of an abuser of propoxyphene, whole blood propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene levels were 4330 and 3800 nanograms/milliliter respectively (Rop et al, 1993).
    b) In severe but nonfatal poisoning, peak plasma propoxyphene concentrations have ranged from 0.7 to 2 micrograms/milliliter (Krantz et al, 1986). Neither the propoxyphene not the propoxyphene plus norpropoxyphene level correlated with the severity of poisoning. In an earlier study, however, a reasonable correlation was found between propoxyphene blood concentration and clinical severity (Gustafson & Gustafson, 1976).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) OPIOID ACTIVITY
    1) Propoxyphene is an opioid analgesic related to methadone with an onset and duration of action similar to that of codeine, but with a slightly less potent analgesic effect. It possesses little antitussive activity and no antipyretic actions (Miller et al, 1970).
    2) Propoxyphene's analgesic, euphoric, respiratory depressant, and gastrointestinal side effects are due to its agonist activity at opioid u (mu or "morphine") receptors. Its affinity for this receptor, however, is about 200 times less than that of morphine and 50 times less than that of methadone (Hynes et al, 1985).
    a) Metabolites of propoxyphene have no measurable affinity for opioid receptors (Hynes et al, 1985).
    3) Propoxyphene is slightly less selective in its affinity for opioid receptors than morphine. It has relatively greater affinity for the opioid d (delta or "enkephalin") receptor. It has little activity at opioid sigma receptors, which mediate CNS stimulant activity (eg, dysphoria, hallucinations, irritability), or at opioid kappa receptors, which mediate apathetic sedation (Hynes et al, 1985).
    4) Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist which has a high affinity for opioid u (mu) receptors (about 60 times that of propoxyphene), is capable of reversing the opioid effects of propoxyphene (Nickander et al, 1984).
    5) Three times more naloxone was required to reverse propoxyphene analgesia than to reverse morphine analgesia (Neil & Terenius, 1981).
    6) Naloxone has also been found to antagonize the convulsant effects of propoxyphene in mice (Gilber & Martin, 1975).
    B) NONOPIOID EFFECTS
    1) LOCAL ANESTHETIC
    a) Both propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene have local anesthetic effects at concentrations about 10 times those necessary for opioid effects. Norpropoxyphene is more potent than propoxyphene and both are more potent than lidocaine in this respect (Nickander et al, 1984).
    2) CARDIAC
    a) Both propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene have direct cardiac effects which include decreased heart rate, decreased contractility, and decreased electrical conductivity (ie, increased PR, AH, HV, and QRS intervals). Norpropoxyphene is several times more potent than propoxyphene in this activity. These effects appear to be due to their local anesthetic activity and are not reversed by naloxone (Nickander et al, 1984; Bredgaard Sorensen et al, 1984; Strom et al, 1985b).
    3) SODIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER
    a) Both propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene are potent blockers of cardiac membrane sodium channels and are more potent than lidocaine, quinidine, and procainamide in this respect (Holland & Steinberg, 1979).
    b) They appear to have the characteristics of a Vaughn Williams Class IC antidysrhythmic.
    c) Lidocaine (and possibly phenytoin), by competing with propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene for receptor sites, can paradoxically decrease their cardiac effects (Whitcomb et al, 1989).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Excessive opioid receptor stimulation is responsible for the CNS depression, respiratory depression, miosis, and gastrointestinal effects seen in propoxyphene poisoning. It may also account for mood/thought altering effects. Local anesthetic activity appears to be responsible for the dysrhythmias and cardiovascular depression seen in propoxyphene poisoning (Strom et al, 1985b). Widening of the QRS complex appears to be a result of a quinidine-like effect of propoxyphene, and sodium bicarbonate therapy appears to have a positive direct effect on the QRS dysrhythmia (Stork et al, 1995).
    B) Seizures may result from either opioid or local anesthetic effects (Nickander et al, 1984).
    C) Acute lung injury may result from direct pulmonary toxicity, neurogenic/anoxic effects, or cardiovascular depression (Strom, 1989).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Propoxyphene is a white or slightly yellow, odorless or nearly odorless powder with a bitter taste.
    B) In equimolar doses, 65 mg of HCl equals 100 mg of napsylate.

Molecular Weight

    A) PROPOXYPHENE: 339
    B) PROPOXYPHENE HCL: 376
    C) PROPOXYPHENE NAPSYLATE: 565

Clinical Effects

    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) Clinical effects: The CNS and CVS effects in animals are qualitatively similar to those noted in humans and treatment is the same (Nickander et al, 1984).

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) DOG
    1) The LDLo of propoxyphene HCl in dogs is 29 mg/kg intravenously, 65 mg/kg intramuscularly, and 100 mg/kg orally (Sax & Lewis, 1989).
    B) SWINE
    1) The lethal dose of propoxyphene HCl in pigs is 10 to 40 mg/kg (Strom, 1989).
    C) RODENT
    1) The LD50 of propoxyphene HCl in mice and rats is 15 to 28 mg/kg by the intravenous route, 50 to 111 mg/kg when given intraperitoneally, 79 to 113 by the subcutaneous route, and 230 to 280 mg/kg orally.
    2) The LD50 of propoxyphene napsylate in rats is 990 mg/kg (Merck, 1990; (Sax & Lewis, 1989).
    3) The oral LDLo of propoxyphene HCl in rabbits is 82 mg/kg (Sax & Lewis, 1989).

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There was no specific information on absorption at the time of this review.
    11.5.3) METABOLISM
    A) GENERAL
    1) The major pathways involved in the biotransformation of propoxyphene, N-demethylation, aromatic hydroxylation, and ester hydrolysis, are the same in all species but their relative degree of activity varies from species to species (Nickander et al, 1984).

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    3) Abernathy DR, Greenblatt DJ, & Steel K: Impairment of hepatic drug oxidation by propoxyphene. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97:223-224.
    4) Afshari R, Maxwell S, & Bateman DN: ECG abnormalities in co-proxamol (paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene) poisoning. Clin Toxicol 2005; 43:255-259.
    5) Allen S: Cerebellar dysfunction following dextropropoxyphene-induced carbamazepine toxicity (Letter). Postgrad Med J 1994; 70:764-769.
    6) Angelo HR & Christensen JM: Gas chromatographic method for the determination of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in human plasma, serum, and urine. J Chromatogr 1977; 140:280-283.
    7) Angelo HR, Kranz T, & Strom J: High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in serum. J Chromatogr 1985; 345:413-418.
    8) Appleton R: Lorazepam vs diazepam in the acute treatment of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus.. Dev Med Child Neuro 1995; 37:682-688.
    9) Atkinson SW, Young Y, & Trotter GA: Treatment with activated charcoal complicated by gastrointestinal obstruction requiring surgery. Br Med J 1992; 305:563.
    10) Barraclough CJ & Lowe RA: Failure of naloxone to reverse the cardiotoxocity of Distalgesic overdose. Postgrad Med J 1982; 58:667-668.
    11) Barrow MV & Sonder DE: Propoxyphene and congenital malformations. JAMA 1971; 217:1551-1552.
    12) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 2nd ed, Biomedical Publications, Davis, CA, 1982, pp 670-674.
    13) Bassendine MF, Woodhouse KW, & Bennett M: Dextropropoxyphene-induced hepatotoxicity mimicking biliary tract disease. Gut 1986; 27:444-449.
    14) Bednarczyk LR, Wetli CV, & Balkon J: Respirator toxicology. J Forens Sci 1981; 26:373-380.
    15) Billig N: Propoxyphene hydrochloride (Darvon(R)) poisoning in a three year old child. Am J Dis Child 1968; 116:187.
    16) Bogartz LJ & Miller WC: Pulmonary edema associated with propoxyphene intoxication. JAMA 1971; 215:259-262.
    17) Boyer EW & Shannon M: The serotonin syndrome. N Eng J Med 2005; 352(11):1112-1120.
    18) Bredgaard Sorensen M, Strom J, & Sloth-Madsen P: Haemodynamic, electrocardiographic and cardiometabolic changes after overdose of propoxyphene: an experimental study in phenobarbitone-anaesthetized pigs. Human Toxicol 1984; 3:53S-59S.
    19) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    20) Briggs GG, Freeman RK, & Yaffe SJ: Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation. 5th ed, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1998.
    21) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    22) Buckley BM & Vale JA: Dextropropoxyphene poisoning: problems with interpretaion of analytical data. Human Toxicol 1984; 3:95S-101S.
    23) Caplan YH, Thompson BC, & Fisher RS: Propoxyphene fatalities: blood and tissue concentrations of propoxyphene and morpropoxyphene and a study of 115 medical examiner cases. J Anal Toxicol 1977; 1:27-35.
    24) Catz CS & Giacoia GP: Drugs and breast milk. Pediatr Clin North Am 1972; 19:151-156.
    25) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    26) Chan TYK: Propoxyphene overdose in Chinese subjects (letter). Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:251-252.
    27) Chapman JE & Walaszek EJ: Antagonism of some toxic effects of dextropropoxyphene by nalorphine. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1962; 4:752-759.
    28) Chernish SM: Adsorption of propoxyphene hydrochloride by activated charcoal. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1972; 5:317-329.
    29) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    30) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    31) Chyka PA & Seger D: Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:721-741.
    32) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    33) Chyka PA: Multiple-dose activated charcoal and enhancement of systemic drug clearance: summary of studies in animals and human volunteers. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33(5):399-405.
    34) Claassen JAHR & Gelissen HPMM: The serotonin syndrome (letter). N Eng J Med 2005; 352(23):2455.
    35) Corby DG & Decker WJ: An antidote for propoxyphene HCI. JAMA 1968; 203(12):1074.
    36) D'Abadie NB & Lenton JD: Propoxyphene dependence: problems in management. South Med J 1984; 77:299-301.
    37) Dalakas M: Subacute painful myopathy from chronic propoxyphene napsylate abuse. JAMA 1986; 255:1709.
    38) De Negri M & Baglietto MG: Treatment of status epilepticus in children. Paediatr Drugs 2001; 3(6):411-420.
    39) Due SL, Sullivan HR, & McMahon RE: Propoxyphene: pathways of metabolism in man and laboratory animals. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 1976; 3:217-225.
    40) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    41) Elonen E & Neuvonen PJ: Mixed dextropropoxyphene poisoning: concentration-effect relationships and effect of naloxone. Internat J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 22:16-19.
    42) Ente G & Mehra MC: Neonatal withdrawal from propoxyphene hydrochloride. State J Med 1978; 2084-2085.
    43) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    44) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    45) Fenzy A & Bogomoletz W: Anorectal ulceration due to abuse of dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol suppositories. J Roy Soc Med 1987; 80:62.
    46) Finkle BS, Caplan YH, & Garriot JC: Propoxyphene in postmortem toxicology 1976-1978. J Forens Sci 1981; 26:739-757.
    47) Finkle BS, McCloskey KL, & Kiplinger GF: A national assessment of propoxyphene in post mortem medicological investigation, 1972-1975. J Forens Sci 1976; 21:706-742.
    48) Finkle BS: Self-poisoning with dextropropoxyphene and dextropropoxyphene compounds: the USA experience. Human Toxicol 1984; 3:1155-1345.
    49) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    50) Fuit RE, Yicchioni AL, & Chin L: Antagonism of convulsive and lethal effects induced by propoxyphene. J Pharm Sci 1966; 55:1085-1087.
    51) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    52) Gary N, Maher JF, & DeMyttenaere MH: Acute propoxyphene hydrochloride intoxication. Arch Intern Med 1968; 121:453-457.
    53) Geber WF & Schramm LC: Congenital malformations of the central nervous system produced by narcotic analgesics in the hampster. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 123:705-713.
    54) Ghannoum M & Gosselin S: Enhanced poison elimination in critical care. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20(1):94-101.
    55) Giacomini KM, Giacomini JC, & Gibson TP: Propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene plasma concentrations after oral propoxyphene in cirrhotic patients with and without surgically constructed post caval shunts. Clin Pharm Ther 1980; 28:417-424.
    56) Giang DW & McBride MC : Lorazepam versus diazepam for the treatment of status epilepticus. Pediatr Neurol 1988; 4(6):358-361.
    57) Giannini AJ, Gregg LO, & Adriano JP: P's and Blues: potentiation of propoxyphene withdrawal by a variety of antihistamines. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1984; 22:397-402.
    58) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    59) Gilber PE & Martin WR: Antagonism of the convulsant effects of heroin, d-propoxyphene, meperidine, normeperidine, and thebaine by naloxone in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1975; 192:538-541.
    60) Gillman PK: Ecstasy, serotonin syndrome and the treatment of hyperpyrexia (letter). MJA 1997; 167:109-111.
    61) Gillman PK: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95(4):434-441.
    62) Gillman PK: Successful treatment of serotonin syndrome with chlorpromazine (letter). MJA 1996; 165:345.
    63) Goldberg RJ & Huk M: Serotonin syndrome from trazodone and buspirone (letter). Psychosomatics 1992; 33:235-236.
    64) Golden NL, King KC, & Sokol RJ: Propoxyphene and acetaminophen: posible effects on the fetus. Clin Pediatr 1982; 21:752-754.
    65) Golden SM & Perman KI: Bilateral clinical anophthalmia: drugs as potential factors. South Med J 1980; 73:1404-1407.
    66) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    67) Gomez HF, Brent JA, & Munoz DC: Charcoal stercolith with intestinal perforation in a patient treated for amitriptyline ingestion. J Emerg Med 1994; 12:57-60.
    68) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    69) Graham PM: Successful treatment of the toxic serotonin syndrome with chlorpromazine (letter). Med J Australia 1997; 166:166-167.
    70) Gram LF, Schmidt K, & Christensen FN: D-propoxyphene kinetics in man: significance of a deep third compartment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 26:749-752.
    71) Gram LF, Schom J, & Way WL: D-propoxyphene kinetics after single oral and intravenous doses in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 26:473-482.
    72) Green HM & Decker WJ: Intravenous self-administration of propoxyphene: case report and in-vitro studies. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:1099-1104.
    73) Gustafson A & Gustafson B: Acute poisoning with dextropropoxyphene. ACTA Med Scand 1976; 200:241-248.
    74) Haggmark S, Strom J, & Reiz S: Effects of prenalterol on central hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in experimental propoxyphene induced shock. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31:52-56.
    75) Hantson P, Evenepoel M, & Ziade D: Adverse cardiac manifestations following dextropropoxyphene overdose: can naloxone be helpful?. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:263-266.
    76) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    77) Harsch HH: Aspiration of activated charcoal. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:318.
    78) Hartmann B, Miyada DS, & Pirkle H: Serum propoxyphene concentrations in a cohort of opiate addicts on long term propoxyphene maintanance therapy. Evidence for drug tolerance in humans. J Anal Toxicol 1988; 12:25-29.
    79) Heaney RM: Left bundle branch block associated with propoxyphene hydrochloride poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1983; 12:780-782.
    80) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    81) Heinonen OP, Slone D, & Shapiro S: Birth Defects and Drugs in Pregnancy, Publishing Sciences Group, Littleton, MA, 1970.
    82) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    83) Holland DR & Steinberg MI: Electrophysiologic properties of propoxyphene and dextropropoxyphene in canine cardiac conducting tissues in vitro and in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 47:123-133.
    84) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    85) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    86) Hynes MD, Lochner MA, & Bemis KG: Fluoxetine, a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake, potentiates morphine analgesia without altering its discriminative stimulus properties or affinity for opioid receptors. Life Sci 1985; 36:2317-2323.
    87) Ilkhanipour K, Yealy DM, & Krenzelok EP: The comparative efficacy of various multiple-dose activated charcoal regimens. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:298-300.
    88) Inturrisi CE, Colburn WA, & Verebely K: Propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene kinetics after single and repeated doses of propoxyphene. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 31:157-167.
    89) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    90) Johnson DA & Bohan ME: Propoxyphene withdrawal with clonidine. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:1217-1218.
    91) Karkkainen S & Neuvonen PJ: Effects of oral charcoal and urine pH on dextropropoxyphene pharmacokinetics (Abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1985; 23:436.
    92) Karliner JS: Propoxyphene hydrochloride poisoning. Report of a case treated with peritoneal dialysis. JAMA 1967; 199:1006.
    93) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    94) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    95) Klein RB, Blatman S, & Little GA: Probable neonatal propoxyphene withdrawal: a case report. Pediatrics 1975; 55:882-884.
    96) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    97) Kline SS, Mauro LS, & Scala-Barnett DM: Serotonin syndrome versus neuroleptic malignant syndrome as a cause of death. Clin Pharmac 1989; 8:510-514.
    98) Krantz T, Thisted B, & Strom J: Severe acute propoxyphene overdose treated with dopamine. Clin Tox 1985; 23:347-352.
    99) Krantz T, Thisted B, & Strom J: Severe acute propoxyphene overdose: plasma concentrations of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene and the effect of dopamine on circulatory failure. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1986; 30:271-276.
    100) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    101) Kunka RL, Venkataramanan R, & Stern RM: Excretion of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in breast milk. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1984; 35:675-680.
    102) Kunka RL, Yong CL, & Ladik CF: Liquid chromatographic determination of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in plasma and breast milk. J Pharm Sci 1985; 74:103-104.
    103) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    104) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    105) Lovejoy FH, Mitchell AA, & Goldman P: The management of propoxyphene poisoning. J Pediatr 1974; 85:98-100.
    106) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    107) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    108) Matthew H & Lawson AAH: Treatment of common acute poisonings, 4th Ed, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1979.
    109) Mattson RH, Weisman GK, & Levy LL: Dependence and central nervous system toxicity associated with the use of propoxyphene hydrochloride. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1969; 94:229-232.
    110) Mauer SM, Paxson CL, & von Hartizsch B: Hemodialysis in an infant with propoxyphene intoxication. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975; 17:88-92.
    111) Mauro LS, Nawarskas JJ, & Mauro VF: Misadventures with activated charcoal and recommendations for safe use. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28(7-8):915-924.
    112) McBay AJ, Turk RF, & Corbelt BW: Determination of propoxyphene in biological materials. J Forens Sci 1974; 19:81-89.
    113) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    114) McCarthy WH & Keenan RL: Propoxyphene hydrochloride poisoning. JAMA 1964; 187:460-461.
    115) McMahon RE, Rodolfo AS, & Culp RW: The fate radiocarbon labelled propoxyphene in rat, dog, and human. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971; 19:427-444.
    116) McMahon RE, Sullivan HR, & Duel S: The metabolite pattern of d-propoxyphene in man: the use of heavy isotopes in drug disposition studies. Life Sci 1973; 12:463-474.
    117) Miller RR, Feingold A, & Paxinos J: Propoxyphene hydrochloride: a critical review. JAMA 1970; 213:996-1006.
    118) Mills KC: Serotonin syndrome: a clinical update. Med Toxicol 1997; 13:763-783.
    119) Mina B, Dym JP, & Kuepper F: Fatal inhalational anthrax with unknown source of exposure in a 61-year-old woman in New York City. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 287:858-862.
    120) Mitchell WG: Status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children, adolescents, and young adults: etiology, outcome, and treatment. Epilepsia 1996; 37(S1):S74-S80.
    121) Mizutani T, Naito H, & Oohashi N: Rectal ulcer with massive hemorrhage due to activated charcoal treatment in oral organophosphate poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:385-386.
    122) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    123) Moore RA, Rumack BH, & Conner CS: Naloxone: underdosage after narcotic poisoning. Am J Dis Child 1980; 134:156-158.
    124) Nash JF, Bennett IF, & Bopp RJ: Quantitation of propoxyphene and its major metabolites in heroin addict plasma after large dose administration of propoxyphene napsylate. J Pharm Sci 1975; 64:429-433.
    125) Neil A & Terenius L: D-propoxyphene acts differently from morphine on opioid receptor-effector mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol 1981; 69:33-39.
    126) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    127) Ng B & Alvear M: Detropropoxypnene addiction -- a drug of primary abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 12:153-158.
    128) Nickander RC, Emmerson JL, & Hynes MD: Pharmologic and toxic effects in animals of dextropropoxyphene and its major metabolite norpropoxyphene: a review. Human Toxicol 1984; 3:13S-36S.
    129) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    130) Park GD, Radomski L, & Goldberg MJ: Effects of size and frequency of oral doses of charcoal on theophylline clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34:663-666.
    131) Pearlman HS, Wollowick BS, & Alvarez EV: Intraarterial injection of propoxyphene into brachial artery. JAMA 1970; 214:2055.
    132) Pederson CB, Strom J, & Angelo HR: Dopamine and dobutamine reduce myocarial d-propoxyphene content in experimentally intoxicated rats. Human Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:109-112.
    133) Perrier D & Gibaldi M: Influence of first-pass effect on the systemic availability of propoxyphene. J Clin Pharmacol 1972; 12:449-452.
    134) Peterson GR, Hostetler RM, & Lehman T: Acute inhibition of oxidative drug metabolism by propoxyphene (Darvon). Biochem Pharmacol 1979; 28:1783-1789.
    135) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    136) Pond SM, Tong TG, & Kaysen GA: Massive intoxication with acetaminophen and propoxyphene: unexpected survival and unusual pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:1-16.
    137) Product Information: ATIVAN(R) injection, lorazepam injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 2003.
    138) Product Information: DARVOCET-N(R) 50, DARVOCET-N(R) 100 oral tablets, propoxyphene napsylate and acetaminophen oral tablets. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Newport, KY, 2009.
    139) Product Information: DARVON(R) oral capsules, propoxyphene hcl oral capsules. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc, Newport, KY, 2006.
    140) Product Information: Darvocet A500(R) oral tablets, propoxyphene napsylate and acetaminophen oral tablets. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc., Newport, KY, 2009.
    141) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    142) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    143) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    144) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    145) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    146) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    147) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    148) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    149) Product Information: propoxyphene HCl acetaminophen oral tablets, propoxyphene HCl acetaminophen oral tablets. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (per DailyMed), Morgantown, WV, 2009.
    150) Quillian WW & Dunn CA: Neonatal drug withdrawal from propoxyphene. JAMA 1976; 235:2128.
    151) Qureshi A, Wassmer E, Davies P, et al: Comparative audit of intravenous lorazepam and diazepam in the emergency treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. Seizure 2002; 11(3):141-144.
    152) Qureshi E: Propoxyphene hydrochloride poisoning. JAMA 1964; 185:470-471.
    153) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    154) Ray MJ, Padin DR, & Condie JD: Charcoal bezoar. Small-bowel obstruction secondary to amitriptyline overdose therapy. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33:106-107.
    155) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    156) Ringrose CAD: The hazard of neurotrophic drugs in the fertile years. Can Med Assoc J 1972; 106:1058.
    157) Rodda BE, Scholz NE, & Gruber CM: Evaluation of plasma concentrations of propoxyphene utilizing a hybrid principal component-analysis of variance technique. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971; 19:554-562.
    158) Rop PP, Grimaldi F, & Bresson M: Simultaneous determination of dextromoramide, propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in necropsic whole blood by liquid chromatography. J Chromatography 1993; 615:357-364.
    159) Rosenberg WM, Ryley NG, & Trowell JM: Dextropropoxyphene induced hepatotoxicity: a report of nine cases. J Hepatol 1993; 19:470-474.
    160) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 7th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, NY, 1989.
    161) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    162) Segest E: Poisoning with dextropropoxyphene in Denmark. Human Toxicol 1987; 6:203-207.
    163) Shannon MW & Lovejoy FH: Propoxyphene. Clin Toxicol Rev 1982; 5:1-2.
    164) Shou J, Angelo H, & Dann W: Pharmacodynamic ox dextroproxyphene in acute poisoning. Arch Toxicol 1978; (Suppl 1):343-346.
    165) Sloth-Madsen PS, Strom J, & Reiz S: Acute propoxyphene self-poisoning in 222 consecutive patients. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28:661-665.
    166) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    167) Starkey IR & Lawson AAH: Acute poisoning with distalgesic. Br Med J 1978; 2:1468.
    168) Sternbach H: The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatr 1991; 148:705-713.
    169) Stork CM, Redd JT, & Fine K: Propoxyphene-induced wide QRS complex dysrhythmia responsive to sodium bicarbonate -- a case report. Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:179-183.
    170) Strode S: Propoxyphene dependence and withdrawal. Am Fam Physician 1985; 32:105-108.
    171) Strom J, Haggmark S, & Nythman H: The effects of dopamine on central hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in experimental propoxyphene induced shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985a; 29:643-650.
    172) Strom J, Haggmark S, & Sloth-Madsen P: The effects of cardiac pacing on central hemodynamics in experimental propoxyphene induced cardiac failure. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1985c; 29:618-622.
    173) Strom J, Haggmark S, & Sloth-Madsen P: The effects of naloxone on central hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in experimental propoxyphene induced circulatory shock. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1985b; 29:693-697.
    174) Strom J: Acute propoxyphene self-poisoning with special reference to propoxyphene cardiotoxicity and treatment. Dan Med Bull 1989; 36:316-336.
    175) Sturner WQ & Garriott JC: Deaths involving propoxyphene: A study of 41 cases over a two year period. JAMA 1973; 223:1125-1130.
    176) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    177) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    178) Tennant FS: Complications of propoxyphene abuse. Arch Intern Med 1973; 132:191-194.
    179) Thamdrup B, Ostergaard OV, & Clausen E: Plasma exchange in the treatment of propoxyphene intoxications. Internat J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1986; 24:379-380.
    180) Tighe TV & Walter FG: Delayed toxic acetaminophen level after initial four hour nontoxic level. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:431-434.
    181) Tyson HK: Neonatal withdrawal symptoms associated with maternal use of propoxyphene hydrochloride (Darvon). J Pediatr 1974; 85:684-5.
    182) US Food and Drug Administration: FDA drug safety communication: FDA recommends against the continued use of propoxyphene. US Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring, MD. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm234338.htm. As accessed 2010-11-19.
    183) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    184) Vale JA, Krenzelok EP, & Barceloux GD: Position statement and practice guidelines on the use of multi-dose activated charcoal in the treatment of acute poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:731-751.
    185) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    186) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    187) Verebely K & Inturrisi CE: Disposition of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene in man after a single oral dose. Clin Pharm Ther 1974; 15:302-309.
    188) Wall R, Linford SM, & Akhter M: Addiction to distalgesic (dextropropoxyphene). Br Med J 1980; 1:1213-1214.
    189) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    190) Warren RD, Meyers DS, & Pape BA: Fatal overdose of propoxyphene, napsylate and aspirin. A case report with pathologic and toxicologic study. JAMA 1974; 230:259-60.
    191) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    192) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    193) Weiss IS: Optic atrophy after propoxyphene overdose. Ann Ophthalmol 1982; 14:586-587.
    194) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    195) Wetli CV & Bednarczyk LR: Deaths related to propoxyphene overdose; a ten year assessment. Southern Med J 1980; 73:1205-1209.
    196) Wheless JW : Treatment of status epilepticus in children. Pediatr Ann 2004; 33(6):376-383.
    197) Whitcomb DC, Gilliam FR, & Starmer CF: Marked QRS complex abnormalities and sodium channel blockade by propoxyphene reversed with lidocaine. J Clin Invest 1989; 84:1629-1636.
    198) Whittington RM & Barclay AD: The epidemiology of dextropropoxyphene (Distalgesic) overdose fatalities in Birmingham and the West Midlands. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1981; 6:251-257.
    199) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    200) Williams DA, Weiss T, & Wade E: Prune perineum syndrome: report of a second case. Teratology 1983; 28:145-148.
    201) Wolen RL, Gruber CM, & Kiplinger GF: Concentration of propoxyphene in human plasma following oral, intramuscular, and intravenous administration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971a; 19:480-492.
    202) Wolen RL, Gruber CM, & Kiplinger GF: Concentration of propoxyphene in human plasma following repeated oral doses. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971b; 19:493-497.
    203) Wolen RL, Ziege EA, & Gruber CM: Determination of propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene by chemical ionization mass fragmentography. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975; 17:15-20.
    204) Woody GE, McLellan AT, & O'Brien CP: Lack of toxicity of high dose propoxyphene napsylate when used for maintenance treatment of addiction. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1980; 16:473-478.
    205) Young DJ: Propoxyphene suicides. Arch Intern Med 1972; 129:62-66.
    206) Young RJ: Dextropropoxyphene overdose: pharmacological considerations and clinical management. Drugs 1983; 26:70-79.
    207) Zaman S, Pearson RM, & Lamb JM: Inhibition of sperm motility by opiate drugs. Brit J Clin Pharmacol (proceedings supplement) 1982.
    208) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    209) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.
    210) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.