MOBILE VIEW  | 

PLANTS-TOXICODENDROL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Toxicodendrol is a phenolic oily resin found in Toxicodendron species (eg, poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac). Dermatitis from these plants affects 50% to 65% of the US population. Cross-sensitivity occurs between the Toxicodendron plants with the antigens being essentially identical.

Specific Substances

    1) Eastern Poison Oak
    2) Markweed
    3) Lobinol
    4) Plants-poison ivy
    5) Poison Ash
    6) Poison Dogwood
    7) Poison Elder
    8) Poison Ivy
    9) Poison Oak
    10) Poison Sumac
    11) Sumac (synonym for poison sumac)
    12) Thunderwood
    13) Toxicodendron pubescens
    14) Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze
    15) Toxicodendron vernix (L.) Kuntze
    16) Toxicodendrol
    17) Toxicodendron diversiloba
    18) Swamp Sumac
    19) Western Poison Oak

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Toxicodendrol contains urushiol, a mixture of antigenic catechols. Urushiol may be colorless or slightly yellow in its natural state. It oxidizes, polymerizes and becomes black when exposed to air. The oil is found in the roots, stems, skin and fruits of plants. It dries quickly and retains antigenic potential in the dry state indefinitely (Gladman, 2006).
    2) Toxicodendron plants include:
    1) Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
    2) Western poison oak (T. diversiloba)
    3) Eastern poison oak (T. pubescens)
    4) Poison sumac or poison dogwood (T. vernix)
    B) SOURCES
    1) CROSS-REACTING PLANTS
    a) Similar chemical compounds found in the Anacardiaceae family may cross-react with individuals sensitive to poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac (Tanner, 2000; Gladman, 2006).
    1) The following is a list of plants that can cross-react:
    1) Cashew nut tree (Anacardium occidentale): Found in the tropical Americas. Cross-reacting resoscinol is found in the oil between nutshell layers. Roasting is required to deactivate the compounds.
    2) Mango (Mangifera indica): Found in the tropics. Leaves, stems, skin and sap contain urushiol and resoscinol.
    3) Japanese lacquer tree (Toxicodendron verniciflua): Found in Japan and China and used for varnishing wood.
    4) Marking nut (Semecarpus anacardium): Found in Southeast Asia, Pacific Islands, and Australia. The black juice is mixed with aluminum to mark laundry.
    5) Rengas tree
    6) Brazilian pepper tree or Florida holly (Schinus terebinthifolius): Native to South America, but may be found in Florida and Hawaii. Contact with sap and crushed berries leads to contact dermatitis.
    2) Plants that may also cross-react, but are not part of the Anacardiaceae family, include:
    1) African poison ivy
    2) Gingko tree
    3) Grevillea plant
    b) In several phytotherapeutic ointments produced in Europe, rhus toxicodendron extract was found to be the active ingredient (Sasseville & Nguyen, 1995). The amount of urushiol is reportedly low, but may still cause reaction in sensitized individuals.

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) BACKGROUND: Toxicodendron is a species of plants which contain toxicodendrols, a phenolic resin. Common plants include poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), poison oak (Toxicodendron toxicarium, Toxicodendron diver-silobum), and poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Toxicodendrols can result in contact dermatitis, and cross-sensitivity occurs between the Toxicodendrol plants. After initial exposure, the antigens react with protein and the immune system forms antibodies. Upon subsequent exposures, inflammatory mediators are released resulting in symptoms.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: It is estimated that contact with these plants can result in dermatitis in more than half of the US population. Toxicodendrons are found in all parts of the United States and southern Canada.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Mild to moderate toxicity typically consist of localized pruritus, pain, erythema and swelling. ONSET: Dermatitis generally appears 24 to 48 hours after exposure or may be delayed from 8 hours to 2 weeks.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Severe toxicity includes more severe localized symptoms such as plaques and/or bullae. Rarely, more systemic symptoms include type 1 hypersensitivity reactions such as respiratory distress and other signs of anaphylaxis. Ingestion can result in gastroenteritis. Renal disease has been reported after ingestion, but is extremely rare. Inhalation of smoke from burning poison ivy caused fatal acute lung injury in an adult.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Ingestion may lead to skin flushing, as well as itching and burning of the lips.
    2) Eye contact may cause redness, lid swelling, photophobia and blepharospasm.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Routine laboratory studies are generally not needed.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Symptomatic and supportive care is the mainstay for toxicodendrol toxicity; remove contaminated clothing and wash skin thoroughly with soap and water. Antihistamines and topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment. Once vesicular stages develop, topical steroids are ineffective and systemic steroids can be given.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Support patient with IV fluids and pressor support if hemodynamic instability develops. Treat anaphylaxis with corticosteroids, antihistamines and epinephrine. Monitor fluid and electrolyte status. Maintain airway if significant compromise develops after oral exposure or anaphylaxis occurs
    3) DECONTAMINATION
    a) PREHOSPITAL: Remove contaminated clothing and wash skin thoroughly with soap and water.
    b) HOSPITAL: If no decontamination has occurred prior to arrival, remove contaminated clothing and wash skin thoroughly with soap and water.
    4) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    a) If there has been an oral exposure, inhalation of smoke from burned plant material, or anaphylaxis leading to airway compromise, intubation and ventilation may be needed. However, this is a rare complication.
    5) ANTIDOTE
    a) No antidote exists for toxicodendrol overdose.
    6) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    a) HOME CRITERIA: Most patients with toxicodendrol exposures can be treated at home with decontamination, topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.
    b) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Any patient who is persistently symptomatic, any systemic symptoms should be observed until symptoms improve and/or resolve.
    c) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients who have large body surface involvement, or systemic toxicity, should be considered for hospital admission for further evaluation.
    d) CONSULT CRITERIA: A toxicologist can be consulted after severe toxicity or large exposures. Dermatology can be consulted for severe dermatitis.
    7) PITFALLS
    a) Not recognizing signs and symptoms of toxicity from toxicodendrols, or possible systemic type 1 reactions after exposure. Also, use topical antihistamines such as benzocaine, zirconium which may act as sensitizers and exacerbate symptoms.
    8) TOXICOKINETICS
    a) Onset of symptoms after exposure to toxicodendrols typically occurs 24 to 48 hours after exposure.
    9) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    a) Other etiologies of allergic contact dermatitis including other urushiol oleoresins: Ginkgoaceae biloba, Macadamia integrifolia, Mangifera indica (mango), Pistacia vera (pistachio), anacardium occidentale (cashew), and Semecarpus anacardium (Bhilawanol).

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: TOXIC DOSE: Dermatitis may be caused by minute quantities of urushiol (eg, as small as 0.001 mg of pure urushiol). ONSET: Varies considerably but is usually 24 to 48 hours after exposure.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) BACKGROUND: Toxicodendron is a species of plants which contain toxicodendrols, a phenolic resin. Common plants include poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), poison oak (Toxicodendron toxicarium, Toxicodendron diver-silobum), and poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Toxicodendrols can result in contact dermatitis, and cross-sensitivity occurs between the Toxicodendrol plants. After initial exposure, the antigens react with protein and the immune system forms antibodies. Upon subsequent exposures, inflammatory mediators are released resulting in symptoms.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: It is estimated that contact with these plants can result in dermatitis in more than half of the US population. Toxicodendrons are found in all parts of the United States and southern Canada.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Mild to moderate toxicity typically consist of localized pruritus, pain, erythema and swelling. ONSET: Dermatitis generally appears 24 to 48 hours after exposure or may be delayed from 8 hours to 2 weeks.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Severe toxicity includes more severe localized symptoms such as plaques and/or bullae. Rarely, more systemic symptoms include type 1 hypersensitivity reactions such as respiratory distress and other signs of anaphylaxis. Ingestion can result in gastroenteritis. Renal disease has been reported after ingestion, but is extremely rare. Inhalation of smoke from burning poison ivy caused fatal acute lung injury in an adult.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Dermal exposure to toxicodendrol is typically not associated with a fever. It is unclear if an oral ingestion can lead to an elevated body temperature. If the patient has a fever following toxicodendrol exposure, evaluate for the presence of infection.
    2) CASE REPORT: FEVER was reported in an 11-year-old boy taking increasing (excessive) doses of tincture of Rhus toxicodendron for 7 weeks (Lowenburg, 1947).
    3) CASE SERIES: In a study of 106 patients, 71 developed a temperature between 98.8 to 100 degrees F; 8 patients had temperatures between 100 to 101 degrees F, and 2 patients developed a temperature between 101 to 102 degrees F (Templeton et al, 1947).

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Ingestion may lead to skin flushing, as well as itching and burning of the lips.
    2) Eye contact may cause redness, lid swelling, photophobia and blepharospasm.
    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Individuals may develop a flushed face after a toxicodendrol ingestion (McNair, 1921).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Dermal exposure may lead to corneal involvement, with pain, photophobia and blepharospasm. Limbal infiltrates have been observed (Grant, 1986).
    2) Dermal contact with the eye may cause redness and swelling of the lids and conjunctiva.
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Symptoms of burning and itching of the lips and mouth were seen within 24 hours of chewing young shoots of poison ivy (Connor, 1907).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old man developed fatal adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) 10 days after inhaling smoke from burning toxicodendron radicans (Gealt & Osterhoudt, 1995). It is speculated that the injury to the respiratory epithelium was due to the direct exposure to urushiol (Kollef, 1995).
    B) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anaphylactic shock with bronchospasm does NOT occur, primarily because the skin is the most sensitive tissue and the primary target organ (Stevens, 1945).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Headache may be seen after ingestion (McNair, 1921; Lowenburg, 1947).
    B) MALAISE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Malaise was observed after injection of 20 mg of pentadecylcatechol IM (Kligman, 1958(a)). CNS depression was seen within a few hours after 2 children (6 and 8 years old) ate approximately 1 pint of poison ivy fruit (Moorman, 1866).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) If ingested, the actual plant or oral hyposensitization treatment may cause severe gastroenteritis (DerMarderosian, 1977; Lowenburg, 1947).
    B) DRUG-INDUCED GASTROINTESTINAL DISTURBANCE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting were reported in patients ingesting Rhus (a lacquer used as a folk medicine to cure gastrointestinal disease) (Park et al, 2000). The delay to onset for systemic symptoms was approximately one day, with a range of 30 minutes to 7 days.

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANURIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anuria, severe acute glomerulonephritis, severe degeneration of the renal tubules and death have occurred (Rytand, 1948; Shaffer & Burgoon, 1951). Renal reactions may take place after the dermatitis has started to heal (Rytand, 1948).
    B) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Urinary retention due to edema of the prepuce has occurred (Fisher, 1996).
    C) GLOMERULONEPHRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Renal disease after ingestion of toxicodendrol is rare. Three types of lesions have been described following oral desensitization treatment; proliferative glomerulonephritis, arteritis, and membranous nephropathy (Devich et al, 1975).
    D) URETHRAL FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A man whose skin was exposure to poison oak while clearing brush developed intense pruritus, involving the anterior penile meatus with continuous urethral irritation (Watts, 1989).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMATOLOGY FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hematologic findings in toxicodendrol toxicity are very rare and are limited to a few case reports, both following injection of a toxicodendrol-containing substance.
    b) Dermal exposure or oral ingestion of a toxicodendrol does not typically lead to hematologic abnormalities.

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Unreacted urushiol may produce secondary lesions after eyelids, genitals, and other sensitive body parts came in contact with an affected an affected area (Anon, 1983).
    b) The allergen may be disseminated by scratching with antigen-contaminated fingernails. The antigen may remain under the fingernails for several days, unless deliberately removed by thorough cleansing.
    c) Various types of rash/dermatitis have occurred. The eruptions are usually asymmetric, characterized by streaks of erythema or papulovesicles in a linear arrangement, and may be associated with considerable edema, especially of the face and eyelids.
    1) The linear configuration of the eruption is a clue to the diagnosis and is produced by contact with vines or stems or by dissemination of the allergen by scratching with contaminated fingernails.
    2) Groups of fluid-filled lesions are also a characteristic finding.
    d) Eczematous eruptions were reported in another group of patients seen by Powell & Barrett (1986). Onset was 8 to 10 days after exposure.
    e) CASE REPORT: One patient exposed to the lacquer tree developed "peeling like a severe sunburn" (Powell & Barrett, 1986).
    f) CASE REPORT: Widespread dermatitis has been reported following topical application of 'Mother Tincture of Rhus toxicodendron', a homeopathic remedy, for treatment of vesicular herpes eruption (Cardinali et al, 2004).
    B) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) LACQUER dermatitis occurs due to the urushiol content of lacquer. In one survey, 81.5% of lacquer workers had experienced lacquer dermatitis (Kawai et al, 1991).
    b) An uncommon finding in poison ivy dermatis is a black spot which develops over a blister. The spot resembles black enamel, may be circular or linear and cannot be removed by washing with soap and water (Hurwitz et al, 1984).
    c) CASE SERIES: Five cases of black spot poison ivy, with an initial presentation of black lesions on the skin that were difficult to wash off, were also associated with pruritus, erythema, urticarial plaques or bullae (Kurlan & Lucky, 2001).
    d) Dark-skinned individuals are less susceptible than other individuals to toxicodendron dermatitis. Younger persons are also more susceptible to poison ivy than are elderly persons (Chapel, 1985).
    e) MANGO: The mango found in Asia, India, Hawaii, Florida, Mexico, and Central America contains oleoresins which cross-react with those of poison ivy causing contact dermatitis (Tucker & Swan, 1998). An adult developed symptoms following prolonged contact with the sap of the mango rind (Tanner, 2000).
    C) BULLOUS ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The fluid-filled blisters contain no antigen and cannot transmit dermatitis, unless they wash unreacted urushiol onto a new skin area (Gayer & Burnett, 1988).
    b) Vesiculation or acute bulbous formations are seen with some acute reactions (DerMarderosian, 1977).
    c) The speed with which an eruption heals depends on the severity and the extent of involvement. Mild cases often resolve within 7 to 10 days, but severe eruptions frequently require 3 weeks or more for resolution (Chapel, 1985).
    D) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dyshidrosis was a rare reaction to poison ivy hyposensitization treatment (Kligman, 1958).
    E) EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Marked edema and erythema may occur after exposure, usually at the peak of the reaction which is 4 to 5 days after exposure (Powell & Barrett, 1986; DerMarderosian, 1977).
    F) ERYTHEMA MULTIFORME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Erythema multiforme was a rare reaction to poison ivy hyposensitization therapy (Kligman, 1958(a)).
    b) CASE SERIES: Three cases of erythema multiforme developed during the resolution phase (approximately one week after exposure) of poison ivy exposure. Most lesions were limited to the upper extremities and primarily on the palmar surfaces, and occurred at the time of prednisone taper. Symptoms resolved following resumption of corticosteroids with a slow taper (Cohen & Cohen, 1998).
    c) CASE SERIES - Four patients developed erythema multiforme (pruritic, weeping, eczematous plaques on torso, extremities, palms, and soles, or erosions on the mucosal surface of upper lip) following severe allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to poison ivy. Three patients were receiving tapering courses of prednisone before the onset of erythema multiforme. Following supportive treatment, all patients recovered without further sequelae. The authors concluded that these cases of erythema multiforme probably represent a nonspecific reaction pattern to severe poison ivy contact dermatitis (Werchniak & Schwarzenberger, 2004).
    G) INJECTION SITE INFLAMMATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Injection of 20 mg of pentadecylcatechol IM caused severe inflammation at the injection site (Cronin, 1972).
    H) HYPERPIGMENTATION OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation may occur following poison ivy dermatitis, and is generally transient (Tanner, 2000). It can be a common manifestation in black skin and rare in white skin (Fisher, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: Volar black ('black spot poison ivy') and erythematous plaques with edema, vesicles and ulceration occurred in an adult following initial dermal exposure to poison ivy. Approximately 10 months after the first episode, the patient had an acute airborne exposure while driving and developed severe respiratory symptoms necessitating intubation. During her hospital stay the patient developed erythema, blistering, and black spots along exposed skin areas that were associated with the airborne distribution. The patient fully recovered following supportive care; however, significant scarring of the arms and face were noted from the previous dermal exposure (Schram et al, 2008).
    I) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Changes in skin pigmentation occurred as a reaction to poison ivy hyposensitization treatment (Kligman, 1958(a)).
    J) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The first symptoms of itching, burning, and redness may appear 30 minutes to 5 days after an exposure, depending upon the sensitivity of the exposed individual (Anon, 1983; Fisher, 1996). But the usual reaction occurs 24 to 48 hours after exposure (DerMarderosian, 1977).
    b) CASE SERIES: Fifty percent of patients treated for oral hyposensitization therapy developed pruritus (Kligman, 1958(a)).
    c) CASE SERIES/LACQUER: In a retrospective review of patients ingesting Rhus (a lacquer used as a folk medicine), all 31 patients experienced generalized or localized pruritus (Park et al, 2000). Symptoms resolved with corticosteroid and antihistamine therapy.

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: An adult female developed severe dermal complication, including volar spots and scarring after an exposure to poison ivy. Approximately 10 months after the first episode, the patient had an acute airborne exposure to poison ivy while driving (exposed to freshly cut plant material), and developed severe respiratory symptoms within minutes requiring self injection with epinephrine. On admission the patient was given another dose of epinephrine and intravenous steroids; however, persistent respiratory symptoms required intubation. The patient was intubated for 4 days. Following intravenous therapy with diphenhydramine, methyl prednisolone and cimetidine, the patient fully recovered (Schram et al, 2008).
    B) DISORDER OF IMMUNE FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Urushiol is a mixture of antigenic catechols (Dawson, 1954), which are haptens, that contact and penetrate the skin. The catechol portion of the molecule is necessary for antigenicity (Baer et al, 1967).
    C) ACUTE ALLERGIC REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Contact with one member of the plant family, Anacardiaceae, may produce cross-sensitivity with other members (Johnson, 1972).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Routine laboratory studies are generally not needed.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) Routine laboratory studies are generally not needed.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) OTHER
    a) Purulent lesions should be cultured.
    1) Brook et al (2000) reported that the predominant aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus and group A beta-hemoltyic streptococci, with the peptostreptococcus spp. being the most prevalent anaerobe found in secondarily infected individuals (Brook et al, 2000).
    2) An association was also made between the anatomical site of the lesion and bacterial flora present, with E. coli and B. fragilis group only recovered from lesions on the legs and buttocks (Brook et al, 2000).

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Urushiol fractions have been identified using GLC analysis (Craig et al, 1978). This technique is not often available, and is seldom necessary for identification.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.5) DISPOSITION/DERMAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.5.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/DERMAL
    A) Patients who have large body surface involvement, or systemic toxicity, should be considered for hospital admission for further evaluation.
    6.3.5.2) HOME CRITERIA/DERMAL
    A) SUMMARY: Most patients with toxicodendrol exposures can be treated at home with decontamination, topical corticosteroids and ora antihistamines.
    B) WASHING: The patient should be advised to wash the entire body with mild soap and water and to carefully clean their fingernails.
    C) CLOTHING: Because the allergenic resin readily impregnates objects, e.g., clothing, shoes, hunting and sporting equipment, tools, and animal fur, all suspect items should be thoroughly washed with soap and water to remove the allergen and prevent re-exposure (Chapel, 1985).
    D) Patients given systemic steroid therapy should schedule a follow-up visit with a dermatologist or family physician in 3 days.
    6.3.5.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/DERMAL
    A) A toxicologist can be consulted after severe toxicity or large exposures. Dermatology can be consulted for severe dermatitis.
    6.3.5.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/DERMAL
    A) Any patient who is persistently symptomatic, any systemic symptoms should be observed until symptoms improve and/or resolve.

Monitoring

    A) Routine laboratory studies are generally not needed.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) There have been few cases where large amounts of Toxicodendron species have been ingested. Activated charcoal would not be necessary for chewing on a stick or eating 1 or 2 berries. Activated charcoal may be beneficial in large toxicodendrol ingestions, although there is a paucity of clinical evidence.
    2) Patients at risk for seizures or CNS depression should NOT be administered activated charcoal due to the risk of aspiration.
    3) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    4) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) Corticosteroids have been used to treat renal toxicity seen with poison oak (Devich et al, 1975).
    2) There is very limited clinical evidence for both renal toxicity and for effectiveness of corticosteroid treatment.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) The symptoms of severe ocular involvement may be relieved by topical use of atropine and steroids (Grant, 1986). However, atropine may cause mydriasis and paralyze accommodation thus worsening the Toxicodendron species induced photophobia.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    2) Washing may only be useful if done in the first 5 minutes (Guin et al, 1989).
    3) ALLERGEN PERSISTENCE
    a) The allergen is oily and nonvolatile and readily impregnates objects. Persistence of allergen permits spread by contaminated fingers, clothing, shoes, tools, animals, and sports and hunting equipment.
    b) The oleoresins responsible for dermatitis quickly become tissue-bound and washing the affected area 10 to 15 minutes after contact does little to remove the antigen. This is probably due to the alkyl and alkenyl catechols of the sap which bind tightly to the skin, and will not wash off.
    c) Immediate soaking of the exposed area in water is recommended, but is not always possible in the woods. The oleoresins involved are not very water soluble.
    1) Immediate washing with soap and water, if possible, can reduce or eliminate the extent of exposure:
    TIME OF WASHING AFTER EXPOSUREEXTENT OF OIL REMOVAL
    Immediately100%
    10 minutes50%
    15 minutes25%
    30 minutes10%
    60 minutesNone

    a) Reference: Fisher, 1996
    d) Soap and water will eventually remove or degrade the material, so all clothes should be laundered several times before wearing.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Symptomatic and supportive care is the mainstay for toxicodendrol toxicity; remove contaminated clothing and wash skin thoroughly with soap and water. Antihistamines and topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment.
    2) Topical and external prophylactic measures have centered on three primary areas:
    1) Removal of the antigen by washing with soap and water or with organic solvents
    2) Use of barrier creams
    3) Detoxicants (oxidizing and complexing agents which may chemically inactivate the antigen)
    3) WASHING: Removal of the antigen by washing with soap and water has shown to be ineffective once the antigen has become fixed to the skin, usually within 10 to 15 minutes.
    4) AVOID topical antihistamines, benzocaine and zirconium, which may act as common sensitizers and cause exacerbation of symptoms (Lee & Arriola, 1999; Tanner, 2000).
    B) PROTECTANT, DERMATOLOGICAL
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Kligman (1958) tested 34 different preparations over a 2 year period on a group of poison ivy sensitive patients and concluded that all of these substances were incapable of preventing the occurrence of dermatitis (Kligman, 1958).
    b) However, it was found that a barrier cream containing organoclay had shown some benefit in preventing or limiting an allergic response (Marks et al, 1995).
    c) ORGANOCLAY: Epstein (1985) evaluated an organoclay made by United Catalyst Inc (Louisville) in a double-blind, randomized study, and found it gave a 95.3% protection, as compared to 29.6% for bentonite, 37.9% for kaolin, and 32.9% for silicone.
    1) CASE SERIES: In a single-blind, paired comparison randomized study of 211 individuals with a history of allergic contact dermatitis to poison ivy/oak, 5% quaternium-18 bentonite lotion significantly prevented or limited the production of an allergic response to experimentally produced urushiol (Marks et al, 1995). It is an organoclay material produced by reacting quaternium-18, a dimethyl dihydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium compound, with bentonite (a natural hydrated colloidal aluminum silicate clay). Although the mechanism of action remains unknown, it is assumed that it acts as a physical barrier to prevent absorption of the allergen.
    2) Quaternium-18 was found to be effective, nonirritating, nonsensitizing, and without toxic or allergic potential, but required the lotion be washed off then reapplied every 4 to 8 hours for ongoing protection (Tanner, 2000).
    2) OTHER PRODUCTS/GENERALLY INEFFECTIVE
    a) Barrier creams have been of little use (Hardin, 1974). Many substances have been tried including alkaline peroxides (Gisbold, 1941), sodium perborate (Shelmire, 1944), tyrosinase (Sizer & Prokesch, 1945), exchange resins (Thurmon et al, 1955), chloramide (Sulzberger et al, 1946) and zirconium salts (Kligman, 1958).
    b) Orchard et al (1986) tested several compounds as protectants. They found simple chemical nucleophiles and polyvinyl pyrrolidones (PBP) were not protective, but polyamine salts of linoleic acid dimers did have the ability to prevent dermatitis in some people (Orchard et al, 1987). The salts appeared to work as a barrier rather than as a chemical reactant. Further work needs to be done to evaluate the substances thoroughly.
    c) PROTECTANT JEFFAMINS: Various polyoxypropylene amines of linoleic acid dimer (called "Jeffamins") have been tested as protectants. Dermatitis was totally prevented in 50% to 73% of subjects exposed to poison ivy extract for 48 hours. If the skin were washed 8 to 12 hours after sequential application of the Jeffamin and the poison ivy extract, 75% to 100% of test subjects were protected (Orchard et al, 1987).
    d) ZIRCONIUM CONTAINING PRODUCTS/WITHDRAWN: Which usually also contain antihistamines were once thought to inactivate urushiol. Contradictory information concerning the efficacy of these agents and the documentation of zirconium sensitivity has led to withdrawal of these agents.
    e) CHEMICAL DETOXICANTS are generally ineffective, in that they are unavailable at the site of the exposure, and are useless after the antigen has combined with the skin.
    C) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Application of cool compresses to the affected areas reduces itching, removes heat from the inflamed surfaces, and provides topical anesthesia. Compresses are also used to help dry the lesions, particularly in the presence of weeping or oozing edematous areas or areas with broken vesicles or bullae (Chapel, 1985).
    a) SOAKING AGENTS: Although tap water alone is effective, astringents such as Burows's solution (aluminum acetate) offers enough advantages to merit its routine use (Simons, 1986). When the dermatitis is widespread, potassium permanganate baths may be prescribed. Starch or oatmeal baths are also soothing (Chapel, 1985).
    b) SOAPLESS SHOWERS: Several times a day may be effective in relieving itching. The water should be directed onto the affected areas until the resulting pleasant sensation subsides and any accumulated exudate has been washed away (Daniell, 1984). This treatment will decrease the risk of secondary infections by removing exudate which provides a culture medium for bacterial growth. Bathing with HOT water may mask symptoms but may increase the physiologic sequelae of vasodilation, erythema, and edema. Repeated exposure to very hot water may increase the itching (Tromovitch et al, 1984).
    D) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) CORTICOSTEROIDS: Are the mainstay of treatment. A topical steroid preparation is adequate for mild, localized cases while moderate to severe cases require treatment with a systemic steroid.
    a) TOPICAL: Mild dermatitis consisting of erythema, edema, and papules limited to a few anatomic regions can be banished with a topical steroid cream or lotion, e.g., hydrocortisone, triamcinolone, desoximetasone or fluocinonide (Chapel, 1985). Topical steroids are ineffective when used in the oozing, vesicular stages.
    1) FREQUENCY: One study (Kaidbeg & Kligman, 1976) demonstrated an advantage of 3 times a day administration over once a day application, but other clinicians failed to show a similar advantage in a 6 times a day application (Roberts, 1985).
    2) CREAM vs OINTMENT: Various studies have demonstrated that one form is better than another, but no consistent difference has been noted.
    3) HYDROCORTISONE CREAM: Apply to affected areas of face or intertriginous regions in a thin film three times a day. In children, apply sparingly because of the greater susceptibility for adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome. Brand names include Cort-Dome(R), Hytone(R), Synacort(R), and Cortaid(R). OTC creams with hydrocortisone in strengths of 0.5% or less may not offer significant benefit (Guin et al, 1989).
    4) DESOXIMETASONE: Used for mild dermatitis consisting of erythema, edema and papules limited to a few anatomic regions. For areas other than the face or intertriginous regions, a desoximetasone cream (0.25%) may be prescribed. It should be applied to the affected area in a thin film 3 times a day. Children should have this material applied sparingly because of greater susceptibility for adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome. Brand names include Topicort(R) and Topicort LP(R).
    5) FLUOCINONIDE: A 0.05% cream may be applied for mild dermatitis. This should be applied to affected areas in a thin film three times a day with the amounts used in children applied sparingly because of greater susceptibility to adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome. Available forms include Lidex(R) and Lidex-E(R).
    6) TRIAMCINOLONE: Another steroid cream that can be used is triamcinolone, in either a 0.025% or 0.1% concentration. It should be applied to the affected area in a thin film 3 times a day with the amount used in children reduced due to greater susceptibility to adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome. Available forms include Kenalog(R), Aristocort(R) and several generic preparations.
    b) SYSTEMIC: Systemic steroids are useful for generalized involvement and for relief of symptoms and associated edema. Most patients with significant poison ivy did not respond to topical steroids but usually respond dramatically to oral steroids.
    1) Indications for systemic steroids in the absence of contraindications, would be progressive lesions or pruritus unresponsive to topical therapy, intractable pruritus that interferes with sleep or daily activities, swelling of the face, genitalia, feet and/or ankles, widespread eruption described as greater than 25% of the body surface area, with patches of vesicles or bullae (Brodell & Williams, 1999).
    2) DOSAGE : The dosage is determined by the severity of the dermatitis and the phase of the skin lesions. Because most cases will reach peak severity after about 3 to 5 days, the required dose may be minimal if the patient is started on systemic steroids after this time; however, if a patient is seen early in the course, dermatitis severity may progress beyond the effectiveness of the original treatment, and a higher initial dose is required (Simons, 1986).
    3) DURATION OF THERAPY: Steroid therapy should be started and tapered over a period of at least 14 to 18 days. Shorter treatment periods, especially those under 1 week, often result in rebound flare of the hypersensitivity reaction, with eruption of new lesions when the drug is stopped (Simons, 1986). The patient should be instructed to complete the full course of medication even if the rash is completely subsided.
    4) PREDNISONE
    a) Two-week tapered course (Oral): 60 mg/day for days 1 through 4; 50 mg/day on days 5 and 6; 40 mg/day on days 7 and 8; 30 mg/day on days 9 and 10; 20 mg/day on days 11 and 12; and 10 mg/day on days 13 and 14 (Brodell & Williams, 1999). This dosing schedule eliminates the possibility of severe rebound exacerbation of rash and pruritus (Ives & Tepper, 1991; Brodell & Williams, 1999; Lee & Arriola, 1999).
    b) Three-week tapered course: 60 mg/day orally for the first week; 30 mg/day orally for the second week; 20 mg/day orally for the third week.
    5) METHYLPREDNISOLONE
    a) A 6 day tapering course of oral methylprednisolone is often prescribed for treatment. There have been several anecdotal reports about flare-ups of the dermatitis several days after completion of the 6 day course (Ives & Tepper, 1991).
    E) ANTIHISTAMINE
    1) Most patients require an oral antihistamine (ie, diphenhydramine or hydroxyzine) for relief of pruritus (Chapel, 1985).
    2) DIPHENHYDRAMINE
    a) ADULT: 25 to 50 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours; CHILD: 5 mg/kg/day orally in 4 divided doses with a maximum of 300 mg/day.
    3) HYDROXYZINE
    a) ADULT: 25 mg orally 3 times a day or 4 times a day; CHILD: 2 mg/kg/day orally in 4 divided doses.
    F) WOUND CARE
    1) Large bullae can be aspirated aseptically with the roofs left intact (Chapel, 1985).
    G) SECONDARY INFECTION
    1) Secondary infections are relatively common following toxicodendron dermatitis.
    2) Treat with antibiotics that have staphylococcus and streptococcus coverage.
    H) PSYCHOLOGIC DESENSITIZATION THERAPY
    1) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) SUMMARY: In general, hyposensitization is not considered an effective method based on its lengthy regimen, multiple side effects, and limited (6 to 10 months) effectiveness (Tanner, 2000).
    b) Oral hyposensitization has been tried with minimal success. Marks et al (1987) tried an orally administered mixture (1:1) of pentadecylcatechol and heptadecylcatechol diacetate without statistically significant hyposensitization. Most over-the-counter products have little or no active ingredients (Marks et al, 1987). This treatment is generally no longer recommended, and when used, is reserved for severely allergic cases of occupational exposure (Epstein, 1973; Block, 1973).
    c) DOSES: Prescription products must be ingested in large quantities over a period of time. Epstein et al (1981; 1974) showed hyposensitization could be done but it required oral doses of greater than 300 mg of urushiol ingested over a long period of time. It takes 3 to 6 months to develop a reduced sensitivity.
    d) SIDE EFFECTS: Pruritus and rashes may develop during treatment, as may other serious symptoms.
    e) DURATION: This hyposensitization immediately begins to deteriorate after the antigen is stopped.
    1) Cashew nuts are in the same family as poison ivy and share similar allergens. Nineteen adults working in a cashew nut shell oil processing plant tested positive to poison ivy allergens. After working for several months, only 3 remained test positive, 2 minimally. This implies that hyposensitization occurred after handling the cashew nut shells (Reginella et al, 1989).
    2) TOLERANCE INDUCTION
    a) Epstein et al (1981) tried to induce tolerance by giving IM injections of a poison ivy oil preparation weekly. Three to five years after the study, one-half of his group had become reactive even without being exposed to poison ivy. This method has not been very effective, and is currently not in use.
    b) Hyposensitization and desensitization does occur in lacquer workers exposed to urushiol. In one study where 81.5% of all workers became sensitized, 55.2% of these became hyposensitized and 12.9% became desensitized. This change in sensitization was noted after daily exposures of about 1 month (Kawai et al, 1991).
    3) POISON IVY EXTRACTS
    a) Should not be administered for treatment of the dermatitis. They are not considered useful and may actually exacerbate the irritation (Baer, 1990).
    4) In a randomized, double-blind, paired comparison study of 10 adult volunteers, the jewel weed plant (extract and juice applied to urushiol exposed sites) was not found to be any more beneficial in the resolution of symptoms when compared to the control - plain water (Long et al, 1997).
    I) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) In a small pilot study (n=10), pentoxifylline, an agent known to suppress irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, was found to be beneficial in limiting patch-test reactivity to urushiol (Rietschel, 1995).
    J) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) DERMATITIS: Typically a reaction will occur 24 to 48 hours after an exposure, but this may range from about 30 minutes to weeks. Often there will be a linear scratch mark before the actual dermatitis appears.
    b) Dermatitis may range from simple erythematous eruptions to weeping lesions to vesiculation or bulbous formations. The lesions usually ooze until a crust is formed. Often there is extensive erythema, edema and pruritus at the reaction site during the peak reactivity which is approximately 5 days after exposure.
    c) Much of the time there is marked delineation between the affected and unaffected skin. The dermatitis is usually self-limiting and will last 1 to 3 weeks without serious sequelae to the skin. Excessive scratching or infection may produce scar tissue (DerMarderosian, 1977).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: TOXIC DOSE: Dermatitis may be caused by minute quantities of urushiol (eg, as small as 0.001 mg of pure urushiol). ONSET: Varies considerably but is usually 24 to 48 hours after exposure.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) ONSET: Varies considerably but is usually 24 to 48 hours after exposure (DerMarderosian, 1977).
    2) AMOUNTS: Dermatitis may be caused by minute quantities, as small as 0.001 mg of pure urushiol (Tyler et al, 1981).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) GENERAL
    a) No toxic serum or blood concentrations have been established.

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) HAPTEN PROTEIN CONJUGATION
    1) The Toxicodendron antigens are haptens that contact and penetrate the skin and conjugate with skin proteins to make complete antigens or irreversibly conjugated proteins. Immunocompetent lymphocytes gather in the affected areas and carry the conjugated proteins to the reticuloendothelial system which then produces a particular antibody-like factor which is spread to the entire skin by the blood stream (DerMarderosian, 1977).
    B) TYPE IV CELL-MEDIATED REACTION
    1) Gayer & Burnett (1988) describe the mechanism for allergic contact as a Type IV cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reaction where the catechol molecules which enter the skin are bound to surface proteins in the Langerhans cells in the epidermis as well as dermis macrophages. These cells then transfer the antigen to T-4 inducer lymphocytes which expand into a clone of circulating activated T-effector and T-memory lymphocytes. When a patient is re-exposed, these lymphocytes produce a cell-mediated cytotoxic immune response (Gayer & Burnett, 1988). The catechol molecules which are bound to carrier proteins also stimulate T-8 suppressor cells (Epstein, 1987).
    C) QUINONE FORMATION
    1) It may be that the catechol is oxidized to a more reactive quinone by the skin, which then conjugates with body proteins producing the complete antigen (Byck & Dawson, 1968).
    D) NOT ABSORBED
    1) These antigens are not infective and do not enter the circulatory system (Anon, 1983).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Toxicodendron radicans
    1) The plant is odorless.
    2) The plant has an acrid, slightly astringent taste.

Molecular Weight

    A) Not applicable

General Bibliography

    1) Anon: Plant-related contact dermatitis. Pharmacy Times 1990; 56:62-66.
    2) Anon: Poison ivy - a problem for all seasons. Hospital Formulary (July), 1978.
    3) Anon: Poison ivy and related plants. Lawrence Rev of Nat Products 1983; 4:5-8.
    4) Baer H, Watkins RC, & Kurtz AP: Delayed contact sensitivity to catechols: III. The relationship of side-chain length to sensitizing potency of catechols chemically related to the active principles of poison ivy. J Immunol 1967; 99:370-375.
    5) Baer RL: Poison ivy dermatitis. Cutis 1990; 46:34-36.
    6) Block SH: Rhus hyposensitization dermatitis. JAMA 1973; 224:627.
    7) Brodell RT & Williams L: Taking the itch out of poison ivy. Are you prescribing the right medication?. Postgrad Med 1999; 106:69-70.
    8) Brook I, Frazier EH, & Yeager JK: Microbiology of infected poison ivy dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:943-946.
    9) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    10) Byck JS & Dawson CR: Assay of protein-quinone coupling involving compounds structurally related to the active principle of poison ivy. Anal Biochem 1968; 25:123-125.
    11) Cardinali C , Francalanci S , Giomi B , et al: Contact dermatitis from Rhus toxicodendron in a homeopathic remedy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50(1):150-151.
    12) Chapel TA: "Toxicodendron dermatitis (poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac)," in Tintinalli JE, Rothstein RJ & Krome RL (Ed): Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1985, pp 685-687.
    13) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    14) Cohen LM & Cohen JL: Erythema multiforme associated with contact dermatitis to poison ivy: three cases and a review of the literature.. Cutis 1998; 62:139-142.
    15) Craig JC, Waller CW, & Billets S: New GLC analysis of urushiol congeners in different plant parts of poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans. J Pharm Sci 1978; 67:483-485.
    16) Cronin E: Contact Dermatitis XVII. Reactions to contact allergens given orally or systematically. Br J Derm 1972; 86:104-107.
    17) Daniell HW: Treatment for Rhus dermatitis. West J Med 1984; 140:619-620.
    18) Dawson CR: Recent Chem Prog 1954; 15:39.
    19) DerMarderosian AH: Poison Ivy and related dermatitis. Drug Therapy 1977; 7:57-74.
    20) Devich KB, Lee JC, & Epstein WL: Renal lesions accompanying poison oak dermatitis. Clin Nephrol 1975; 3:106-113.
    21) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    22) Epstein WL: Plant-induced dermatitis. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:950-955.
    23) Epstein WL: Poison ivy and oak hyposensitization. JAMA 1973; 224:256.
    24) Epstein WL: The poison ivy picker of pennypack park: the continuing saga of poison ivy. J Invest Dermatol 1987a; 88:7S-11S.
    25) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    26) Fisher AA: Poison ivy/oak dermatitis. Part I: Prevention-soap and water, topical barriers, hyposensitization. Cutis 1996; 57:384-386.
    27) Fisher CM, Kistler JP, & Davis JM: Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning.. Neurosurgery 1980; 6:1-8.
    28) Gayer KD & Burnett JW: Toxicodendron dermatitis. Cutis 1988; 42:99-100.
    29) Gealt L & Osterhoudt KC: Adult respiratory distress syndrome after smoke inhalation from burning poison ivy (questions and answers). JAMA 1995; 274:358.
    30) Gladman AC : Toxicodendron dermatitis: poison ivy, oak, and sumac. Wilderness Environ Med 2006; 17(2):120-128.
    31) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    32) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    33) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986.
    34) Gross M: Urushiols of poisonous anacardiaceae. Phytochemistry 1975; 14:2263-2266.
    35) Guin JD, Kligman AM, & Maibach HI: Treating poison ivy, oak, and sumac. Patient Care 1989; 23:227-237.
    36) Hardin JW: Things you should know about poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac in North Carolina, Circular 577, North Carolina Agr. Extension Service North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC, 1974.
    37) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    38) Hurwitz RM, Rivera HP, & Guin JD: Black-spot poison ivy dermatitis. Am J Dermatopathol 1984; 6:319-322.
    39) Ives TJ & Tepper RS: Failure of a tapering dose of oral methylprednisolone to treat reactions to poison ivy. JAMA 1991; 266:1362.
    40) Kaidbeg K & Kligman A: Assay of topical corticosteroids: efficacy of suppression of experimental Rhus dermatitis in humans. Arch Derm 1976; 112:808.
    41) Kawai K, Nakagawa M, & Kawai K: Hyposensitization to urushiol among Japanese lacquer craftsmen. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:146-147.
    42) Kingsbury JM: Poison ivy, poison sumac and other rash-producing plants, State College of Agr and Life Sci, Cornell Univ, Extension Bulletin, Ithaca, NY, 1971, pp 154.
    43) Kligman AM: Hyposensitization against Rhus dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1958(a); 78:47-72.
    44) Kligman AM: Poison ivy (Rhus) dermatitis: an experimental study. Arch Dermatol 1958; 77:149-180.
    45) Kollef MH: Adult respiratory distress syndrome after smoke inhalation from burning poison ivy (questions and answers). JAMA 1995; 274:358-359.
    46) Kurlan JG & Lucky AW : Black spot poison ivy: A report of 5 cases and a review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45(2):246-249.
    47) Lampe KF & Fagerstrom R: Plant toxicity and dermatitis, William and Wilkens Company, Baltimore, 1968.
    48) Lee NP & Arriola ER: Poison ivy, oak, and sumac dermatitis. West J Med 1999; 171:354-355.
    49) Long D, Ballentine NH, & Marks JG: Treatment of poison ivy/oak allergic contact dermatitis with an extract of jewelweed. Am J Contact Derm 1997; 8:150-153.
    50) Lowenburg H Jr: Poisoning due to tincture of Rhus toxicodendron. JAMA 1947; 135:91-93.
    51) Marks JG, Fowler JF, & Sherertz EF: Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quaternium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 35:212-216.
    52) Marks JG, Trautlein JJ, & Epstein WL: Oral hyposensitization to poison ivy and poison oak. Arch Dermatol 1987; 123:476-478.
    53) McNair JB: Internal poisoning from Rhus. Arch Dermatol Syph 1921; 4:62-66.
    54) Menne T & Hjorth N: Reactions from systemic exposure to contact allergens. Sem Dermatol 1982; 1:15-24.
    55) Moorman JW: Poisoning by eating fruit of Rhus toxicodendron: recovery. Am J Med Sci 1866; 51:560.
    56) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    57) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    58) Orchard SM, Fellman JH, & Storrs FJ: Topical substances which prevent poison ivy allergic contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereal 1987; 134(Suppl):103-106.
    59) Park SD, Lee SW, & Chun JH: Clinical features of 31 patients with systemic contact dermatitis due to the ingestion of Rhus (lacquer). Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:937-942.
    60) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    61) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    62) Powell SM & Barrett DK: An outbreak of contact dermatitis from Rhus verniciflua (Toxicodendron vernicifluum). Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14:288-289.
    63) Ratner JH, Spencer SK, & Grainge JM: Cashew nut dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1974; 110:921-923.
    64) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    65) Reginella RF, Fairfield JC, & Marts JG Jr: Hypersensitization to poison ivy after working in a cashew nut shell oil processing factory. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20:274-279.
    66) Rietschel RL: A pilot study of pentoxifylline for the prevention of poison ivy/oak reactions. Contact Derm 1995; 32:365-366.
    67) Roberts JR: Poison ivy dermatitis: treatment. Emergency Dept News 1985.
    68) Rytand DA: Fatal anuria, the nephrotic syndrome and glomerular nephritis as sequela of the dermatitis of poison oak. Am J Med 1948; 5:548-560.
    69) Sasseville D & Nguyen KH: Allergic contact dermatitis from rhus toxicodendron in a phytotherapeutic preparation. Contact Derm 1995; 32:182-183.
    70) Schram SE, Willey A, Lee PK, et al: Black-spot poison ivy. Dermatitis 2008; 19(1):48-51.
    71) Shaffer B & Burgoon CF: Acute glomerulonephritis following administration of Rhus toxin. JAMA 1951; 146:1570-1572.
    72) Shelmire B: Sodium perborate ointment and poison ivy dermatitis. JAMA 1944; 116:681-683.
    73) Simons HM: "Dermatologic emergencies," in Schwartz GR, Sarar P, Stone JH, et al (Ed): Principles and Practice of Emergency Medicine, ed 2, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp 1256-1258.
    74) Sizer IW & Prokesch CE: The destruction by tyrosinase of the irritant principles of poison ivy and related toxicants. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1945; 4:363-374.
    75) Stevens FA: Status of poison ivy extracts. JAMA 1945; 127:912-921.
    76) Sulzberger MB, Baer RL, & Kanof A: Chloroamide-containing ointments in prevention of experimental poison ivy dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 1946; 7:145-146.
    77) Tanner TL: Rhus (toxicodendron) dermatitis. Dermatol 2000; 27:493-502.
    78) Templeton HJ, Lunsford CJ, & Allington HV: Poison oak dermatitis. Studies on hematologic, urinary and temperature changes. J Invest Dermatol 1947; 8:53-54.
    79) Tromovitch TA, Stegman SJ, & Glogau RG: Pruritus of poison oak dermatitis - other views. West J Med 1984; 141:111-112.
    80) Tucker MO & Swan CR: The mango-poison ivy connection - Images in Clinical Medicine. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:235.
    81) Tyler VE, Brady LR, & Robbers JE: Pharmacognosy, 8th ed, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1981.
    82) Werchniak AE & Schwarzenberger K: Poison ivy: An underreported cause of erythema multiforme. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:S87-S88.