MOBILE VIEW  | 

PLANTS-MITRAGYNA

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Summary Of Exposure

    A) BACKGROUND: Kratom refers to a group of tree-like plants native to countries in Southeast Asia (ie, Thailand, Malaysia, and Myanmar) and is part of the Rubiaceae family. Its leaves contain mitragynine and related alkaloids, which have psychoactive properties. It has more than 25 alkaloids, but mitragynine is the most abundant and produces the opioid-like effects. Kratom, known as Mitragyna speciosa Korth, has been produced as an herbal drug. Mitragynine is structurally similar to yohimbine.
    B) USES: Traditionally, the kratom leaves were used as a herbal stimulant by farmers in Southeast Asia. Kratom has also been used to treat hypertension, coughs and diarrhea. It has also been used as an opium substitute, psychoactive substance and an emerging drug of abuse. Kratom is available in the US via the Internet and smoke shops. It is available as an extract, capsules, pellets and gum and is often drunk as tea, chewed or smoked.
    C) PHARMACOLOGY: Mitragynine, an indole alkaloid, is active at the supraspinal opioid mu- and delta-receptors. Mitragynine may stimulate post-synaptic alpha-2 adrenergic receptors; alternatively it may block stimulation of 5-HT2A receptors.
    D) TOXICOLOGY: Mitragynine, at lower to moderate doses (1 to 5 g of raw leaves) can produce mild stimulant effects but can also produce anxiety and agitation; higher doses (5 to 15 g) can produce opioid-like effects (ie, sedation, euphoria, analgesia). Effects appear to be dose dependent. The alkaloids are 13 times more powerful than morphine. Kratom contains 7-hydroxymitragynine that is 4 times more powerful than mitragynine.
    E) EPIDEMIOLOGY: There have been some reports of deaths following kratom use and it has been banned in some countries in Europe and Asia. It is currently listed as a drug of concern in the US. Although there have been reports of increased kratom exposure, the number of cases remain relatively low.
    F) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ACUTE EFFECTS: Clinical effects with "therapeutic" use include mild euphoria and CNS stimulation. ONSET: Effects occur approximately 5 to 10 minutes after chewing the leaves. DURATION: 2 to 5 hours. Reversible intrahepatic cholestasis occurred after daily kratom use for 2 weeks in a young adult. Dermatitis has been reported after exposure to the wood of Mitragyna stipulosa.
    2) CHRONIC EFFECTS: Mitragyna can produce dry skin, emaciation, abdominal distention, anorexia and weight loss, constipation, darkened skin and lips, pallor, flushing, twitching, peripheral numbness, and cardiac abnormalities (unspecified) with chronic use. Frequent micturition may occur after chronic use.
    3) OCCUPATIONAL: Nasal irritation has resulted from occupational exposure to the sawdust of Mitragyna stipulosa.
    4) HABITUAL USE has been reported after chewing the leaves due to its "calming" effect.
    G) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) OVERDOSE: Acute overdose is not frequently reported. The effects of kratom is thought to be dose-dependent. Stimulant effects occur at lower doses while higher doses produce opiate effects. Single large doses may cause stupor, vertigo, nausea and vomiting.
    2) ACUTE TOXICITY: In one case series, common symptoms reported with acute kratom exposure include: palpitations, seizures, nausea and abdominal pain. Other symptoms included: alteration of consciousness, hallucinations, psychosis, confusion, agitation, respiratory depression, increased urination, headache, dizziness, syncope, myalgia, dry mouth, diaphoresis, high blood pressure, anorexia, weight loss and diarrhea. In a series of adults, 50 mg of pure mitragynine produced motor excitement, rombergism, giddiness and tremors of the face, extremities and tongue.
    3) WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME: Habitual users may develop a marked withdrawal syndrome with chronic use of kratom. Common presenting symptoms in a small case series of patients with withdrawal syndrome included: myalgia, insomnia, fatigue and chest discomfort. Addiction has also been reported with kratom use. RARE: In general, seizures have been reported rarely. Deaths have also been associated with kratom use.
    4) MISUSE: Kratom has been abused by teenagers in Asia and is often combined with a caffeinated drinks and cough suppressants (ie, codeine, dextromethorphan, or antihistamines).

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Alteration in blood pressure have been reported infrequently with kratom use.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Alteration in blood pressure have been reported infrequently with kratom use (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).

Heent

    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) DARKEN LIPS may occur after prolonged use (Emboden, 1980).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) ANIMAL DATA: Marked corneal irritation was observed in rabbit corneas after the instillation of 1% mitragynine. Haziness occurred at 15 minutes, however, there was no permanent damage. Lower concentrations of mitagynine produced proportionally less irritation (Grewal, 1932a).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) IRRITATION: Occupational exposure to the sawdust of Mitragyna stipulosa has been associated with the development of nasal irritation (Mitchell & Rook, 1979).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cardiac disorders (type unspecified) have been a concern in chronic users (Emboden, 1980).
    B) PALPITATIONS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a series of 40 cases of acute kratom exposure, 9 (22.5%) patients developed palpitations (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    3.5.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEART DISORDER
    a) Depressed cardiac contraction was noted in isolated heart preparations perfused with mitragynine (Grewal, 1932a).
    2) HEART BLOCK
    a) Heart block, PR interval prolongation and T-wave changes were observed in cats given intravenous doses of mitragynine (Grewal, 1932a).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Large doses may lead to stupor or coma (Nelsen et al, 2010; Wray, 1907b). Depressant effects similar to opium and marijuana have been described (Shellard & Houghton, 1975).
    b) Alterations in consciousness, dizziness, confusion and headache have been reported with acute exposure to kratom (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    c) In a series of 12 cases of withdrawal syndrome with kratom use, the following CNS effects were observed: insomnia, agitation, tremor, ataxia, and dystonia (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    B) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Seizure activity has been reported rarely with kratom use
    b) CASE SERIES: In a series of 40 cases of acute kratom exposure, 7 (17.5%) patients developed seizures (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old man developed a new onset of seizure activity and coma after self-reported use of "kratom" (an herbal drug that has activity at opioid receptors and used as an adjunct to chronic pain). He was found unconscious by his wife after drinking a tea containing kratom and Datura stramonium. On admission, his seizures had stopped and he had a Glasgow coma score of 6. One hour later, a second seizure was observed and the patient remained unresponsive. He was intubated and given lorazepam and phenytoin. Thirty hours after admission the patient was awake and successfully extubated. He reported using kratom for chronic pain. Laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of kratom in the urine, as well a positive urine drug screen for cannabinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and oxycodone. A serum tricyclic antidepressant concentration obtained shortly after admission was negative (lower limit of detection 50 ng/mL) (Nelsen et al, 2010).
    C) CENTRAL STIMULANT ADVERSE REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC USE: An effect similar to taking cocaine was described by Suwanlert (1975) in a study of 30 chronic kratom users. The onset of stimulation was between 5 and 10 minutes. Mitragynine excites the motor centers of the CNS similar to cocaine (Grewal, 1932a).
    D) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vertigo may occur after overdoses of mambog (Duke, 1985) and has been reported following chronic kratom use (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    E) NUMBNESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Peripheral numbness may occur with chronic use (Emboden, 1980; Grewal, 1932a).
    F) SPASMODIC MOVEMENT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Twitching is occasionally seen in habitual users (Duke, 1985; Emboden, 1980).
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CNS STIMULATION
    a) CATS given large doses experienced stimulatory effects different than those seen with opiates; specifically, increased exploratory behavior without the fear and rage complex observed with opiate use different than those seen with opiates (Macko et al, 1972).
    2) CNS DEPRESSION
    a) Animal and tissue studies using mitragynine have shown opiate-like depressant effects. Mitragynine was about 1/10th the potency of morphine in these studies (Watanabe et al, 1997).
    b) RATS treated with a methanol extract from Mitragyna africanus stembark exhibited CNS depression. No deaths were recorded, even with doses up to 6.4 grams/kilogram. Barbiturate sleeping time was enhanced, and the extract increased the time of onset of strychnine-induced convulsions, as well as, decreased the number of spasms (Aji et al, 2001).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vomiting may occur after acute overdose of mambog (Duke, 1985) and has been reported following kratom use (Forrester, 2013).
    B) NAUSEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea has been reported with kratom use (Forrester, 2013; Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    b) CASE SERIES: In a series of 40 cases of acute kratom exposure, 6 (15%) patients developed nausea (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    C) SWOLLEN ABDOMEN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC USE: Abdominal distention may occur with chronic usage (Duke, 1985).
    D) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a series of 40 cases of acute kratom exposure, 5 (12.5%) patients developed abdominal pain (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    E) APTYALISM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC USE: Dry mouth may occur with chronic use (Shellard & Houghton, 1975) and has been reported as a withdrawal symptom with kratom use (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013).
    F) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC USE: Constipation and small black or green feces may occur with chronic use (Shellard & Houghton, 1975) and has been reported with kratom use (Forrester, 2013).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CHOLESTASIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old man developed reversible intrahepatic cholestasis after ingesting "kratom" (mitragyna speciosa) daily for 2 weeks. He presented to the emergency department about 10 days after drug cessation with abdominal pain, jaundice and pruritus. The patient reportedly ingested 2 teaspoons (approximately 4.6 to 7.0 g) of kratom twice daily during the first week, and increased it to 4 to 6 teaspoons daily during the second week. The patient denied other drug use; a toxicology screen was negative. Laboratory studies included an elevated direct bilirubin of 28.6 mg/dL (reference value: less than 0.3 mg/dL), indirect bilirubin 2.3 mg/dL (reference value: less than 0.9 mg/dL), slightly elevated liver enzymes, and normal renal function. Serology studies for viral and autoimmune hepatitis were negative. Diagnostic studies showed evidence of steatosis of the liver, and a liver biopsy confirmed cholestatic injury without hepatocellular damage. Clinical and laboratory concentrations gradually improved with complete recovery (Kapp et al, 2011).
    B) CHOLECYSTITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old healthy man was admitted with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and dark urine. Approximately, 2 weeks prior to admission, he had ingested a large amount of alcohol (15 to 20 drinks over a 24 hour period) and 15 g of kratom while at a party. Two days later he noticed fever and constant RUQ pain that radiated to his shoulder and left flank. His initial laboratory studies included a total bilirubin of 2.3 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase of 171 Units/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 448 Units/L, and aminotransferase (AST) of 483 Units/L. An ultrasound of the gallbladder showed diffuse gallbladder wall thickening with pericholecystic fluid without cholelithiasis or sludge. Viral hepatitis titers were negative and an acetaminophen level was negative. Serum and urine mitragynine concentrations were positive for mitragynine. The patient was treated symptomatically and gradually improved. His liver enzymes peaked at an AST of 483 Units/L and ALT of 703 Units/L. The patient was discharged to home on day 3 with no further symptoms (Arens et al, 2015).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INCREASED FREQUENCY OF URINATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Frequent micturition was reported in chronic kratom users (Forrester, 2013; Shellard & Houghton, 1975).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DRY SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dry skin and an unhealthy complexion was noted in habitual users (Grewal, 1932b).
    B) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Darkened skin color even without sun exposure has been reported in habitual users (Grewal, 1932b).
    C) PALE COMPLEXION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pallor has been observed in habitual users (Emboden, 1980).
    D) FLUSHING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Flushed skin or blushing is a constant and notable effect after use (Grewal, 1932a).
    E) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE: Sawdust made from the wood of M. stipulosa has been shown to cause dermatitis and nasal irritation for some workers. In one such case of dermatitis, a positive patch test was found (Mitchell & Rook, 1979).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) At the time of this review no data were available to assess the effects of mitragyna alkaloids on reproduction.
    B) Condensates from wood smoke obtained from Mitragyna ciliata demonstrated mutagenicity in experimental tests.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the teratogenic potential of this agent.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during pregnancy or lactation.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the carcinogenic potential of this agent.

Genotoxicity

    A) Condensates from wood smoke obtained from Mitragyna ciliata were considered mutagenic using a Salmonella microsomal assay (Asita, 1991). The role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in inducing mutagenicity could not be determined.
    B) An alkaloid-rich extract from Mitragyna inermis did not exhibit mutagenic or genotoxic activities in mammalian cells. The extract did show a strong inhibition of protein synthesis (Traore et al, 2000).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Routine laboratory studies are not necessary in most patients. Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and diarrhea.
    B) Monitor neuro status and respiratory function following a significant exposure.
    C) Monitor liver enzymes in patients with abdominal pain or jaundice.
    D) The active constituents of these plants are not detected on routine urine toxicology screens.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) OTHER
    1) Routine laboratory studies are not necessary in most patients. Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and diarrhea.

Methods

    A) HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
    1) Mitragyna speciosa korth (also known as kratom) an herbal drug used for chronic pain was confirmed in the urine of an adult by using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to an electrospray tandem mass spectrometry to quantify mitragyna in the urine. The data revealed linear calibration for mitragynine in the range from 0.05 to 5.0 ng/mL and high precision intra-day and inter-day analysis. The lower limit of detection was 0.02 ng/mL (Nelsen et al, 2010).
    B) LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
    1) Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry quantified the alkaloids of Mitragyna speciosa in the serum and urine of a young adult following "kratom" use for 2 weeks. Concentrations were low and likely due to the relatively small amounts of mitragynine found in the samples (purchased via the internet) and the long interval between kratom use and presentation (Kapp et al, 2011).
    C) GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
    1) Samples of "kratom" (Mitragyna speciosa) purchased via the internet by a young adult were confirmed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The samples were sold as "Malaysian Green" and "Thai Pump" and both were found to contain mitragynine, the latter containing significantly more mitragynine. No synthetic adulterants or contaminants were detected (Kapp et al, 2011).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with significant persistent CNS system effects (ie, seizure activity, agitation), or other persistent clinical symptoms should be admitted. Patients with significant CNS depression or coma should be admitted to an intensive care unit.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Adults that are experiencing minimal symptoms may be monitored at home if a responsible, sober adult is present. Asymptomatic children with an inadvertent minor ingestion (eg, 1 capsule of kratom) can be monitored at home if a responsible adult is present and there are no issues of neglect.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a regional poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear. Patients with a history of chronic abuse should be referred for rehabilitation.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with more than minimal symptoms (ie, agitation, hallucinations) and symptomatic children should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and observation.

Monitoring

    A) Routine laboratory studies are not necessary in most patients. Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and diarrhea.
    B) Monitor neuro status and respiratory function following a significant exposure.
    C) Monitor liver enzymes in patients with abdominal pain or jaundice.
    D) The active constituents of these plants are not detected on routine urine toxicology screens.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Following a minor "taste" exposure to the plant, GI decontamination is generally not warranted. Patients may also develop nausea and vomiting following exposure to the plant. Due to the potential risk of CNS depression and possible seizure activity following exposure to kratom products (eg, teas, capsules or tablets that contain M. speciosa), prehospital GI decontamination is not indicated.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) There are infrequent reports of seizure activity following the ingestion of kratom products (eg, teas, capsules or tablets that contain M speciosa). Activated charcoal should only be considered after a large ingestion or if more toxic coingestants are involved, and the patient is awake and the airway is protected.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Limited case reports are available in the literature. A patient may only require observation. Benzodiazepines should be given for agitation as needed. Reassure the patient. Intravenous fluids may be indicated, if the patient develops significant vomiting and diarrhea.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY: Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Monitor CNS function. Repeat benzodiazepine therapy as necessary for agitation or possible seizure activity. Orotracheal intubation is indicated for airway protection in cases of severe agitation, coma or seizure activity.
    B) ANTIDOTE
    1) There is no specific antidote. In tests on experimental animals, the effects were NOT antagonized by nalorphine, but more recent studies have shown mitragynine acts at opioid mu and delta receptor subtypes. In tissue studies, the effects of mitragynine were reversed with naloxone, as well as, naloxonazine and naltrindole (Takayama et al, 2000; Yamamoto et al, 1999; Watanabe et al, 1997). It is therefore; unclear if the use of naloxone would be of benefit.
    2) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    3) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    C) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Routine laboratory studies are not necessary in most patients.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and diarrhea.
    3) Monitor airway. Monitor for CNS depression, seizure activity and/or respiratory insufficiency following a significant exposure.
    4) Monitor liver enzymes in patients with abdominal pain or jaundice.
    5) The active constituents of this plant are not detected on a routine urine toxicology screen.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Monitor airway. Significant CNS depression or seizure activity may require ventilatory support. Based on limited data, seizure activity has been reported following the use of kratom (ie, tea containing Mitragyna speciosa Korth) and other coingestants (Nelsen et al, 2010).
    E) SEIZURE
    1) Seizure activity has been reported infrequently following kratom use (Trakulsrichai et al, 2013; Nelsen et al, 2010).
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    3) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    4) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    5) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    6) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    7) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) There is no evidence that enhanced elimination procedures would be effective following an exposure.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: There is no well-defined toxic dose. Acute exposure to the plant material in children has not been reported. Mitragynine, at lower to moderate doses (1 to 5 g of raw leaves) can produce mild stimulant effects but can also produce anxiety and agitation; higher doses (5 to 15 g) can produce opioid-like effects (ie, sedation, euphoria, analgesia). Effects appear to be dose dependent. In adults, 50 mg of pure mitragynine produced motor excitement, rombergism, giddiness and tremors of the face, extremities and tongue. Seizures have been reported rarely. The leaves appear to be better tolerated than the pure mitragynine. Reversible intrahepatic cholestasis occurred after daily kratom (M. speciosa) use for 2 weeks in a young adult. FATALITY: Kratom use was associated with the death of teenager.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) A minimum lethal dose has not been established.
    B) CASE REPORT
    1) A 17-year-old teenager, with a history of heroin abuse and self medication with kratom for chronic back pain, was found unresponsive. He was pronounced dead by the EMS unit. Postmortem laboratory studies were negative for drugs of abuse and of the 4 therapeutic drugs found, all were within normal limits with the exception of a slightly elevated diphenhydramine concentration. The mitragynine level was 0.6 mg/L. The cause of death was suggestive of "possible kratom toxicity" (Neerman et al, 2013).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Mitragynine, at lower to moderate doses (1 to 5 g of raw leaves) can produce mild stimulant effects but can also produce anxiety and agitation; higher doses (5 to 15 g) can produce opioid-like effects (ie, sedation, euphoria, analgesia). Effects appear to be dose dependent (Prozialeck et al, 2012). The alkaloids are 13 times more powerful than morphine. Kratom contains 7-hydroxymitragynine that it is 4 times more powerful than mitragynine.
    2) In adults, 50 mg of pure mitragynine produced motor excitement, rombergism, giddiness, and tremors of the face extremities, and tongue (Grewal, 1932a). The leaves appear to be better tolerated than the pure mitragynine (Jansen & Prast, 1988a).
    3) Chronic users of the leaves may chew as often as 3 to 10 times/day (Shellard & Houghton, 1975).
    B) CASE REPORT
    1) CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old man developed reversible intrahepatic cholestasis after ingesting "kratom" (mitragyna speciosa) daily for 2 weeks. The patient reportedly ingested 2 teaspoons (approximately 4.6 to 7 g) of kratom twice daily during the first week, and increased it to 4 to 6 teaspoons daily during the second week. The patient denied other drug use; a toxicology screen was negative. Laboratory studies included an elevated direct bilirubin and indirect bilirubin, slightly elevated liver enzymes, and normal renal function. Serology studies for viral and autoimmune hepatitis were negative. Diagnostic studies showed evidence of steatosis of the liver and a liver biopsy confirmed cholestatic injury without hepatocellular damage. Clinical and laboratory levels gradually improved with complete recovery (Kapp et al, 2011).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old healthy man was admitted with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and dark urine. Approximately, 2 weeks prior to admission, he had ingested a large amount of alcohol (15 to 20 drinks over a 24 hour period) and 15 g of kratom while at a party. Two days later he noticed fever and constant RUQ pain that radiated to his shoulder and left flank. His initial laboratory studies included a total bilirubin of 2.3 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase of 171 Units/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 448 Units/L, and aminotransferase (AST) of 483 Units/L. An ultrasound of the gallbladder showed diffuse gallbladder wall thickening with pericholecystic fluid without cholelithiasis or sludge. Viral hepatitis titers were negative and an acetaminophen level was negative. Serum and urine mitragynine concentrations were positive for mitragynine. The patient was treated symptomatically and gradually improved. His liver enzymes peaked at an AST of 483 Units/L and ALT of 703 Units/L. The patient was discharged to home on day 3 with no further symptoms (Arens et al, 2015).
    C) ANIMAL DATA
    1) No toxic effects (such as seizures) were seen in mice after doses as high as 920 mg/kg (Macko et al, 1972).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) POSTMORTEM CONCENTRATION
    a) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old teenager, with a documented history of heroin abuse and chronic low back pain and purportedly self-medication with kratom (M speciosia), was found dead. A postmortem blood concentration of mitragynine was 0.6 mg/L. The cause of death was determined to be possibly due to kratom toxicity. Other drugs (eg, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, temazepam and 7-amino-clonazepam) were found, but considered to be noncontributory to death (Neerman et al, 2013).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) ALKALOIDS: The actions of Mitragyna species are due to their alkaloid content. Examples are:
    1) Corynantheidol: from M parvifolia (Shellard & Houghton, 1973).
    2) Dihydrocorynantheol: from M. parvifolia (Shellard & Houghton, 1973).
    3) Insoratundifoline: an oxindole alkaloid (FAO, 1986).
    4) Isorhynchophylline: an oxindole alkaloid (FAO, 1986).
    5) Mitraciliatine: an indole alkaloid (FAO, 1986).
    6) Mitragynine: Central nervous system stimulation effects similar to cocaine have been described in animal tissue studies (Grewal, 1932a). Mitragynine is structurally similar to indole psychadelics like psilocybin and lysergic acid amide; however, hallucinogenic effects have been described (Jansen & Prast, 1988) (Shellady, 1988). CNS depressant activities similar to the opiates have been reported in tissue and animal studies. These effects appeared to be about 1/10th the potency of morphine (Watanabe et al, 1997).
    7) (-)-Mitralactonine: an indole alkaloid (Takayama et al, 1999).
    8) Mitraphylline: local anesthetic, hypotensive, and CNS depressant (FAO, 1986).
    9) Mitraversine: local anesthetic, lowers arterial pressure, increases cardiac rhythm, disturbs the autonomous lymphatic cells of the intestine (FAO, 1986).
    10) Mitrinermine: local anesthetic, lowers arterial pressure, increases cardiac rhythm, disturbs the autonomous lymphatic cells of the intestine (FAO, 1986).
    11) Rotundifoline: an oxindole alkaloid (FAO, 1986).
    12) Rhychociline: an oxindole alkaloid (FAO, 1986).
    13) Rhynchophylline: antipyretic, hypotensive (FAO, 1986).
    14) Speciociliatine: an analgesic and antitussive, like codeine (Duke, 1985).
    15) An alkaloidal extract from M. inermis has shown antimalarial activity (Traore et al, 2000).
    B) ANALGESIA: When compared to codeine in experiments on dogs, Mitragyna was found to compare favorably. It did not cause emesis or dyspnea like codeine, was not antagonized by nalorphine, did not have a dependence syndrome, had little anticholinergic effect, and had less respiratory depression (Jansen & Prast, 1988a). Studies have shown that mitragynine, isolated from Mitragyna speciosa, exhibited potent opioid agonistic activity at opioid mu- and delta-subtype receptors. A derivative of mitragynine, mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, is a more potent analgesic than morphine (Takayama et al, 2000).
    1) Rabbits treated with a methanol extract from the stembark of Mitragyna africanus showed a significant local anesthetic effect equivalent to that of lidocaine (Aji et al, 2001).
    C) Non-alkaloid constituents include flavonoids, epicatechin, and ursolic acid (Said et al, 1991).
    D) ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY: An extract from Mitragyna stipulosa has shown antimicrobial activity against Vibrio cholerae (Akinsinde & Olukoya, 1995).
    E) Kratom refers to a group of tree-like plants native to countries in Southeast Asia (ie, Thailand, Malaysia, and Myanmar) and is part of the Rubiaceae family. Its leaves contain mitragynine and related alkaloids, which have psychoactive properties. It has more than 25 alkaloids, but mitragynine is the most abundant and produces the opioid-like effects. Kratom, known as Mitragyna speciosa Korth, has been produced as an herbal drug. Mitragynine is structurally similar to yohimbine (Prozialeck et al, 2012).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Mitragynine, at lower to moderate doses (1 to 5 g of raw leaves) can produce a mild stimulant effect but can also produce anxiety and agitation and higher doses (5 to 15 g) can produce opioid-like effects (ie, sedation, euphoria, analgesia). Effects appear to be dose dependent (Prozialeck et al, 2012). The alkaloids are 13 times more powerful than morphine. Kratom contains 7-hydroxymitragynine that it is 4 times more powerful than mitragynine.

Clinical Effects

    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) STIMULATION - Cats experienced stimulating effects qualitatively unlike those seen with opiates when given large doses. Increased exploratory behavior, without opiate "rages" were noted (Macko et al, 1972).

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) RODENT
    1) Mice given doses of up to 920 milligrams/kilogram did not experience toxic signs such as seizures or tremors (Jansen & Prast, 1988a).

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    3) Aji BM, Onyeyili PA, & Osunkwo UA: The central nervous effects of Mitragyna africanus (Willd) stembark extract in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2001; 77:143-149.
    4) Arens A, Gerona R, Meier K, et al: Acute Cholecystitis Associated With Kratom Abuse. Clin Toxicol 2015; 53(7):661-661.
    5) Beckett AH, Shellard EJ, & Phillipson JD: The Mitragyna species of Asia. Part IV: Oxindole alkaloids from the leaves of M. speciosa Korth. Planta Medica 1966; 14:266-276.
    6) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    7) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    8) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    9) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    10) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    11) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    12) Duke JA: Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1985, pp 314.
    13) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    14) Emboden W: Narcotic Plants, Collier Books, a division of MacMillian Publishing, New York, NY, 1980.
    15) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    16) FAO: Some Medicinal Forest Plants of Africa and Latin America, Forestry Paper 67 from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 1986.
    17) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    18) Field EJ: Mitragynine and mitraversine, two new alkaloids from species of Mitragyne. Transactions Chem Soc 1921; 119:887-891.
    19) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    20) Forrester MB: Kratom exposures reported to Texas poison centers. J Addict Dis 2013; 32(4):396-400.
    21) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    22) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    23) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    24) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    25) Grewal KS: Observations on the pharmacology of mitragynine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1932a; 46:251-271.
    26) Grewal KS: The effect of mitragynine on man. Br J Med Psychol 1932b; 12:41-58.
    27) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    28) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    29) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    30) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    31) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    32) Jansen KLR & Prast C: Ethnopharmacology of kratom and the Mitragyna alkaloids. J Ethnopharmacol 1988; 23:115-119.
    33) Jansen KLR & Prast CJ: Psychoactive properties of mitragynine (kratom). J Psychoactive Drugs 1988a; 20:455-457.
    34) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    35) Kapp FG, Maurer HH, Auwarter V, et al: Intrahepatic cholestasis following abuse of powdered kratom (Mitragyna speciosa). J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(3):227-231.
    36) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    37) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    38) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    39) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    40) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    41) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    42) Macko E, Weisbach JA, & Douglas B: Some observations on the pharmacology of mitragynine. Arch Internationales Pharmacodynamie Therapie 1972; 198:145-151.
    43) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    44) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    45) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    46) Mitchell J & Rook A: Botanical Dermatology, Greengrass Press, Vancouver, BC, 1979.
    47) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    48) Neerman MF, Frost RE, & Deking J: A drug fatality involving Kratom. J Forensic Sci 2013; 58 Suppl 1:S278-S279.
    49) Nelsen JL, Lapoint J, Hodgman MJ, et al: Seizure and coma following kratom (Mitragynina speciosa Korth) exposure. J Med Toxicol 2010; 6(4):424-426.
    50) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    51) Norakanphadung P: Pramuan Khuamru Ruang Yaseptit Hai Thot, Thanyarak Hospital, Bangkok, 1966.
    52) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    53) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    54) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    55) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    56) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    57) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    58) Prozialeck WC, Jivan JK, & Andurkar SV: Pharmacology of kratom: an emerging botanical agent with stimulant, analgesic and opioid-like effects. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2012; 112(12):792-799.
    59) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    60) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    61) Said IM, Chun NC, & Houghton PJ: Ursolic acid from Mitragyna speciosa. Planta Medica 1991; 57:398.
    62) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    63) Shellard EJ & Houghton PJ: The mitragyna species of Asia. XXIV. The isolation of dihydrocorynantheol and corynantheidol from the leaves of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth from Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Planta Med 1973; 24:13-17. .SK 1 Suwanlert S: A study of kratom eaters in Thailand. Bull Narcotics 1975; 27:21-27.
    64) Shellard EJ: The alkaloids of Mitragyna with special reference to those of M. speciosa Korth. Bull Narcotics 1974; 26:42-55.
    65) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    66) Takayama H, Aimi N, & Sakai S: Chemical studies on the analgesic indole alkaloids from the traditional medicine (Mitragyna speciosa) used for opium substitute (abstract). (Japanese). Yakugaku Zasshi 2000; 120:959-967.
    67) Takayama H, Kurihara M, & Kitajima M: Isolation and asymmetric total synthesis of a new Mitragyna indole alkaloid, (-)-mitralactonine. J Org Chem 1999; 64:1772-1773.
    68) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    69) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    70) Trakulsrichai S, Tongpo A, Sriapha C, et al: Kratom abuse in Ramathibodi Poison Center, Thailand: a five-year experience. J Psychoactive Drugs 2013; 45(5):404-408.
    71) Traore F, Gasquet M, & Laget M: Toxicity and genotoxicity of antimalarial alkaloid rich extracts derived from Mitragyna inermis O. Kuntze and Nauclea latifolia. Phytother Res 2000; 14:608-611.
    72) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    73) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    74) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    75) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    76) Watanabe K, Yano S, & Horie S: Inhibitory effect of mitragynine, an alkaloid with analgesic effect from Thai medicinal plant Mitragyna speciosa, on electrically stimulated contraction of isolated guinea-pig ileum through the opioid receptor. Life Sci 1997; 60:933-942.
    77) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    78) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    79) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    80) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    81) Wray L: "Biak": An opium subtitute. J Fed Malay States Museums 1907a; 2:53-56.
    82) Wray L: Notes on the anti-opium remedy. Pharm J 1907b; 78:453.
    83) Yamamoto LT, Horie S, & Takayama H: Opioid receptor agonistic characteristics of mitragynine pseudoindoxyl in comparison with mitragynine derived from Thai medicinal plant Mitragyna speciosa. Gen Pharmacol 1999; 33:73-81.
    84) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    85) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.