MOBILE VIEW  | 

PLANTS-CARDIAC GLYCOSIDES

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) These are glycosides of plant origin that specifically affect the heart.
    B) The venom of the cane toad (Bufo marinus) also contains large quantities of cardiac glycosides.
    C) Ingestion of a few seeds of yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) can cause severe toxicity or death. Refer to "Plants-Thevetia" document for information on exposures to Yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).

Specific Substances

    A) CONSTITUENTS OF THE GROUP
    1) Oleander (Nerium oleander)
    2) Wintersweet (Carissa spectabilis)
    3) Bushman's poison (Carissa acokanthera)
    4) Frangipani (Plumeria rubra)
    5) Sea-mango (Cerbera manghas)
    6) Lily of the valley (Convallaria majalis)
    7) Sea onion (Urginea maritima)
    8) Squill (Urginea maritima)
    9) Sea squill (Urginea maritima)
    10) Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea)
    11) Purple foxglove (Digitalis purpurea)
    12) Cerbera
    13) Odollam
    14) Cerbera odollam
    15) Cerbera manghas
    16) Cerbera venenifera
    17) Cardiac glycoside plants
    MEMBERS OF THE MILK WEED FAMILY
    1) Balloon cotton (Aesclepias fruiticosa)
    2) Redheaded cottonbush (Asclepias curassavica)
    3) Dogbanes (Apocynam species; Apocynum cannabinum)
    4) King's crown (Calotropis procera)
    5) Rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora)
    MEMBERS OF THE HELLEBORE FAMILY
    1) Cryptostegia grandiflora
    2) Adonis vernalisare
    3) Strophanthus (Strophanthus gratus)
    4) Erysimum cheiranthoides
    5) References: (Radford et al, 1986; Hollman, 1985; Lampe & McCann, 1985; Lei et al, 2002; Kamel et al, 2001)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) An estimated 400 different cardiac glycosides have been identified in plants (Fuller & McClintock, 1986). Cardiac glycosides are contained in digitalis leaf, foxglove (Digitalis purpurea), Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis), oleander (Nerium oleander), Yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana), Strophanthus seeds (kombe/gratis/gratus), and Squill (Urginea maritima/sea onion/Indica bulbs), Digitalis lanata, Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum), and Adonis vernalisare.
    2) Ingestion of a few seeds of yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) can cause severe toxicity or death. Refer to "Plants-Thevetia" document for information on exposures to yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).
    B) SOURCES
    1) ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE
    a) GEE'S LINCTUS COUGH is a pharmacy only cough mixture found throughout New Zealand that contains anhydrous morphine, squill (obtained from the Urginea maritima plant and contains several cardiac glycosides), and ethanol. There was a report of cardiac toxicity (AV conduction block) and proximal myopathy (severe muscle weakness) in an adult that ingested 200 mL of the cough syrup daily for over 4 months. No permanent effects were reported (Griffiths et al, 2009).
    2) TOPICAL PRODUCT
    a) COMMERCIAL PRODUCT: NeriumAD is a commercially available anti-wrinkle cream that contains 30% nerium oleander extract per bottle. It is available in a 30 mL bottle within an internal airless pump (Nerium SkinCare Inc., San Antonio, TX; phone: 210-822-7908).
    C) USES
    1) TRANSDERMAL USE OF NERIUM OLEANDER: A complete heart block developed in a man after the transdermal use of homemade lotion of Nerium oleander blooms and leaves (Wojtyna & Enseleit, 2004).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: An estimated 400 different cardiac glycosides have been identified in plants. Cardiac glycosides are contained in digitalis leaf, foxglove (Digitalis purpurea), Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis), oleander (Nerium oleander), Yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana), Strophanthus seeds (kombe/gratis/gratus), and Squill (Urginea maritima/sea onion/Indica bulbs), Digitalis lanata, Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum), and Adonis vernalisare. Refer to "Plants-Thevetia" document for information on exposures to yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Increased intracellular calcium leads to early afterdepolarization, cardiac irritability, and dysrhythmias. Increased vagal and decreased sympathetic tones lead to bradycardia and heart block. Inhibition of the sodium-potassium ATPase pump causes hyperkalemia.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Cardiac glycoside toxicity from plant exposures is rare, but severe toxicity and deaths may occur. Life-threatening poisoning has been reported after ingestion of plant extracts and teas, use of contaminated herbal products, and deliberate ingestion of substantial quantities of plant parts by adults.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Toxicity from cardiac glycosides can be acute (from single overdose due to accidental plant ingestion by a child or due to a self-harm attempt by an adult) or chronic toxicity (very rare from plant exposures). The manifestations and treatment are slightly different. The most common effects following acute ingestion are nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, lethargy, and bradycardia. With chronic toxicity, patients often present with bradycardia, malaise, nausea, anorexia, delirium, and vision changes. DERMAL: Toxicity is not anticipated after topical application of commercial preparations (ie, lotions, creams) that contain nerium oleander. INHALATION: Toxicity has been reported following inhalation of smoke from yellow oleander (thevetia peruviana) but not from other oleander species.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Patients with acute poisoning may develop severe bradycardia, heart block, vomiting, and shock. Hyperkalemia is a marker of severe acute toxicity and serum potassium is the best predictor of cardiac glycoside toxicity after acute overdose. Severe chronic toxicity causes ventricular dysrhythmias and varying degrees of heart block, but hyperkalemia is uncommon.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) For acute cardiac glycoside exposure, serum potassium is the best marker of toxicity. Serum potassium should be monitored every 60 minutes following any potentially significant acute exposure to a cardiac glycoside. Serum potassium is NOT predictive of toxicity for chronic cardiac glycoside toxicity.
    B) Monitor serial s serum electrolytes every hour, until patient is improved. Although non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may produce a detectable serum digoxin concentration, the quantitative results are not reliable; while a measurable digoxin concentration may confirm exposure, the quantitative concentration cannot be used to guide therapy.
    C) Monitor renal function.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECG's.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients who do not develop significant cardiac toxicity require only supportive care and monitoring. Patients with mild bradycardia and nonspecific symptoms from chronic poisoning should be monitored and rehydrated, but do not require specific therapy.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Following acute ingestion, patients with hyperkalemia (greater than 5 mEq/L), symptomatic bradycardia, ventricular ectopy, or dysrhythmias should be treated with digoxin immune Fab. Digoxin immune Fab is also indicated for patients with chronic toxicity with ventricular ectopy or symptomatic bradycardia. If digoxin immune Fab is not available, patients can be treated with atropine or cardiac pacing for bradycardia, and antidysrhythmics (lidocaine or amiodarone) for ventricular ectopy or dysrhythmias. Other treatments have been suggested. Phenytoin (100 mg to 300 mg IV bolus) and magnesium sulfate (2 g) have both been anecdotally reported to produce resolution of dysrhythmias from cardiac glycoside poisoning. Finally, cardiac pacing (at a rate that exceeds cardiac ectopy) can be used for patients who do not respond to medical management.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Emesis is not recommended for cardiac glycoside ingestion. Activated charcoal should be given to patients who can protect their airway and are not actively vomiting.
    2) HOSPITAL: Cardiac glycosides are well adsorbed by charcoal; administration of charcoal should be considered in all cases that present within 1 to 2 hours of ingestion.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway protection is mandatory in patients with altered mental status.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) The antidote for cardiac glycoside poisoning is digoxin immune Fab (digoxin immune antibody fragment) which rapidly reverses the effect of cardiac glycosides.
    2) INDICATIONS: Indications for digoxin immune Fab include manifestations of severe toxicity (ventricular dysrhythmias, progressive bradyarrhythmias, 2nd or 3rd degree heart block), refractory hypotension, hyperkalemia (greater than 5 mEq/L in acute overdose), or lack of response to conventional therapy.
    3) DOSE: Interpretation of serum digoxin concentrations after plant ingestions is difficult and they should not be used to guide therapy. The ideal dose for these patients in unknown, an initial dose of 2 vials is reasonable, titrate further doses to clinical condition. Administer 10 to 20 vials for critically ill patients or patients in cardiac arrest.
    4) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Allergic reactions are rare, but can happen, especially in patients with a history of asthma and/or allergy to antibiotics. Hypokalemia, worsening of heart failure, and loss of ventricular rate control can also occur.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis does not increase the clearance of digoxin. Multiple dose charcoal enhances digoxin clearance and may be considered in a patient who can protect their airway if digoxin immune Fab is not available.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients who have only GI symptoms can be discharged after a minimum of 8 hours of observation.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Admit all patients, who develop dysrhythmias, heart block, severe vomiting, or who require digoxin immune Fab treatment, to an ICU setting.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Digoxin has a slow redistribution phase, so high serum concentrations are expected for several hours following doses. A single high digoxin concentration in an otherwise asymptomatic patient is not an indication for treatment. Severe toxicity from cardiac glycosides is very difficult to treat if digoxin immune Fab is not available. Serum digoxin concentrations will rise after digoxin immune Fab treatment if the assay used does not distinguish free from bound digoxin. Non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may cross-react with antibodies found in most radioimmunoassay kits and result in digoxin being reported as present.
    I) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) The differential diagnosis should include other causes of bradycardia, heart block, altered mental status, and hypotension, including calcium channel antagonists, beta-blockers, clonidine, and medical causes such as acute myocardial infarction or hypoxia.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: There is a great variability in the response following the ingestion of cardiac glycoside containing plant material. Observation of the patient for clinical effects is probably most useful in estimating amount of material ingested. Life threatening toxicity is rare, and generally occurs only in adults after deliberate ingestions of large quantities of plant material, or in those who are using methods which can extract high concentrations of glycosides from plant materials (eg making decoctions, infusions or extracts).
    B) PEDIATRIC: Serious poisoning rarely develops after "taste" ingestions of whole plant material by children. Taste/exploratory ingestions of Lily of the valley or oleander (Nerium oleander) are unlikely to result in toxicity.
    1) A 5-year-old child only developed vomiting after ingesting 15 berries of Lily-of-the-valley.
    C) CERBERA ODOLLAM: Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel.
    D) Life threatening poisoning has been reported after ingestion of plant extracts and teas, use of contaminated herbal products, and deliberate ingestion of substantial quantities of plant parts by adults.
    1) DIGITALIS PURPUREA: An adult died approximately 5 hours after intentionally ingesting a whole digitalis purpurea plant.
    2) THEVETIA PERUVIANA: Ingestion of a few seeds of yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) can cause severe toxicity or death. Refer to PLANTS-THEVETIA document for information on exposures to yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: An estimated 400 different cardiac glycosides have been identified in plants. Cardiac glycosides are contained in digitalis leaf, foxglove (Digitalis purpurea), Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis), oleander (Nerium oleander), Yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana), Strophanthus seeds (kombe/gratis/gratus), and Squill (Urginea maritima/sea onion/Indica bulbs), Digitalis lanata, Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum), and Adonis vernalisare. Refer to "Plants-Thevetia" document for information on exposures to yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Increased intracellular calcium leads to early afterdepolarization, cardiac irritability, and dysrhythmias. Increased vagal and decreased sympathetic tones lead to bradycardia and heart block. Inhibition of the sodium-potassium ATPase pump causes hyperkalemia.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Cardiac glycoside toxicity from plant exposures is rare, but severe toxicity and deaths may occur. Life-threatening poisoning has been reported after ingestion of plant extracts and teas, use of contaminated herbal products, and deliberate ingestion of substantial quantities of plant parts by adults.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Toxicity from cardiac glycosides can be acute (from single overdose due to accidental plant ingestion by a child or due to a self-harm attempt by an adult) or chronic toxicity (very rare from plant exposures). The manifestations and treatment are slightly different. The most common effects following acute ingestion are nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, lethargy, and bradycardia. With chronic toxicity, patients often present with bradycardia, malaise, nausea, anorexia, delirium, and vision changes. DERMAL: Toxicity is not anticipated after topical application of commercial preparations (ie, lotions, creams) that contain nerium oleander. INHALATION: Toxicity has been reported following inhalation of smoke from yellow oleander (thevetia peruviana) but not from other oleander species.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Patients with acute poisoning may develop severe bradycardia, heart block, vomiting, and shock. Hyperkalemia is a marker of severe acute toxicity and serum potassium is the best predictor of cardiac glycoside toxicity after acute overdose. Severe chronic toxicity causes ventricular dysrhythmias and varying degrees of heart block, but hyperkalemia is uncommon.

Heent

    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) TONGUE: Numb tongue was reported in a fatal case of oleander tea (Nerium oleander) poisoning (Haynes et al, 1985).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) VISUAL DISTURBANCES, including blurred vision and what was described as "yellow scintillations", occurred in patients after ingestion of an herbal laxative adulterated with digitalis lantana and an oleander contaminated coffee (La Couteur & Fisher, 2002; LoVecchio et al, 1998; Slifman et al, 1998).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) A marked bradycardia with varying first, second, and third degree heart block is seen with these glycosides (Eddleston & Haggalla, 2008; Tsai et al, 2008; Pietsch et al, 2005; Lacassie et al, 2000; Porter et al, 1999; Graeme et al, 1998; Rich et al, 1993; Driggers et al, 1989). Ventricular dysrhythmias and asystole may also occur (Pearn, 1987; Graeme et al, 1998).
    b) CERBERA MANGHAS
    1) In Sri Lanka, a man died approximately 5 hours after ingestion of cerbera manghas fruit (also known as natchchukkai seeds in this region). Bradycardia (40 beats/minute), hypotension (100/60 mmHg) and drowsiness were observed upon admission. Atropine was administered along with performing gastric lavage. However, the patient developed severe bradycardia with third degree AV block followed by ventricular fibrillation, which did not respond to treatment (Eddleston & Haggalla, 2008).
    c) CERBERA ODOLLAM
    1) CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old woman developed severe bradycardia (heart rate: 30 beats/minute), hypotension (BP 90/60 mmHg) and an abnormal ECG (including atrial flutter with variable atrioventricular block, slow ventricular response, shortened QT interval and peaked T-waves) after intentionally ingesting an unknown amount of seeds from a Cerbera odollam ("Pong-pong") tree that was purchased via the Internet. Hyperkalemia (7.5 mmol/L) and an elevated creatinine (2.6 mg/dL) were found on laboratory exam. A digoxin level was undetectable (less than 0.3 ng/mL) and a toxicology screen was noncontributory. Supportive therapy included atropine, calcium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, glucose and insulin therapy. She also received 10 vials of digoxin immune Fab resulting in normal sinus rhythm with further improvement of other ECG findings. She received an additional 10 vials of digoxin immune Fab with complete resolution of ECG abnormalities within 24 hours. The patient recovered completely (Kassop et al, 2014).
    2) Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel (Gaillard et al, 2004).
    d) FOXGLOVE
    1) CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old woman developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and cardiovascular shock with sinus bradycardia (38 beats/minute) after ingesting a concoction of foxglove leaves in a suicide attempt; the apparent digitoxin level in serum was 162 nmol/L (124 mcg/L). Her health status improved after treatment with atropine, dimethicone, alginic acid and metoclopramide (Lacassie et al, 2000).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old Asian woman developed nausea, vomiting, lethargy, dizziness, and weakness after ingesting 4 large foxglove leaves 4 hours before admission. Her ECG revealed sinus and junctional bradycardia (transiently dipped into the 30s) with intermittent second degree AV block. Her digoxin and potassium levels were 0.8 ng/mL (normal levels 1.9 or less) and 4.5 mEq/L, respectively. She was treated with 2 vials of Digibind(R) approximately 24 hours post-ingestion. Since her bradycardia and AV block persisted and her digoxin level did not change, she was treated with 2 additional vials of Digibind(R) approximately 48 hours post-ingestion, without notable effect. She was discharged 2 days later with transient AV block. The authors believed that in the case of foxglove ingestion, the measured digitalis level does not necessarily reflect all of the cardiac alkaloids that are present in serum (Porter et al, 1999).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old woman presented with persistent nausea and vomiting. An ECG showed sinus bradycardia (36 beats/minute) with non-specific ST-T wave abnormalities. It was determined, through detailed questioning, that the patient had ingested foxglove that was mistakenly used in a salad. Laboratory analysis showed a serum digitoxin level of 43 ng/mL (therapeutic range 10 to 32 ng/mL), confirming the diagnosis of foxglove poisoning. With supportive care, the patient's bradycardia and gastrointestinal symptoms gradually resolved (Newman et al, 2004).
    e) OLEANDER
    1) NERIUM OLEANDER: A 13-month-old child developed episodes of first-degree heart block and bradycardia after ingestion of an unknown material. A serum sample from the patient 21 hours after the onset of symptoms showed an elevated digoxin level of 6.1 nmol/L. Reverse-phase HPLC was performed that identified the causative agent as Nerium oleander, a plant with cardiac glycoside activity (Gupta et al, 1997).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman ingested oleander leaves, prazepam, and flunitrazepam in a suicide attempt and subsequently developed sinus bradycardia. The patient recovered following vigorous decontamination procedures (Tracqui et al, 1998).
    3) TRANSDERMAL: A 59-year-old man with a history of psoriasis developed bradycardia (heart rate 26 bpm) after using homemade lotion which he made by boiling Nerium oleander blooms and leaves twice with water. The patient applied this lotion twice daily. ECG revealed a new third-degree AV block with a broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block (LBBB); a previous ECG showed a normal sinus rhythm with first-degree AV block and LBBB. A temporary pacemaker was implanted in the ICU. Because of persistent third-degree block, a definitive DDDR pacemaker was implanted 4 days later. He recovered and was discharged 4 days after the implantation. On follow-up exam, 3 months later, his ECG showed normal sinus rhythm with LBBB (Wojtyna & Enseleit, 2004).
    4) NERIUM OLEANDER: A 66-year-old woman developed severe bradycardia (20 beats/minute) with asystolic periods of 4 seconds and then spontaneously developed PAT (140 beats/minute) following ingestion of unprocessed nerium oleander leaves (Graeme et al, 1998).
    5) OLEANDER: Oleander smoke inhalation resulted in the development of sinus bradycardia without AV block in a 42-year-old female. A digoxin assay performed 48 hours postexposure was measured at 0.3 ng/mL (Khasigian et al, 1998).
    f) DIGITALIS LANATA
    1) CASE REPORT: An ECG revealed sinus bradycardia (52 beats/minute) in a patient who ingested approximately 4.2 grams three times daily of Chomper(R), an herbal laxative with plantain as the key ingredient, for 3 days prior to presentation to the ED. The patient's serum digitalis level was 5.2 ng/mL. Following supportive care, the patient was discharged 2 days later with a serum digitalis level of 1.3 ng/mL. An enzyme immunoassay technique identified that the Chomper(R) tablet contained digitalis lanata instead of plantain (LoVecchio et al, 1998).
    g) OTHER
    1) SQUILL (SCILLA SPECIES): A 55-year-old woman presented with lethargy and bradycardia two hours after a squill plant ingestion to treat arthritis. Nine hours after ingestion, the patient became comatose and developed complete AV block. The bradycardia was unresponsive to atropine and a temporary pacemaker was applied. Twenty-six hours after ingestion, the patient developed ventricular tachycardia that was unresponsive to lidocaine therapy. Despite aggressive supportive treatment, ventricular fibrillation developed and the patient died thirty hours after the squill ingestion. The patient's serum digoxin level, obtained by an enzyme immunoassay method, was 1.59 ng/mL. (Tuncok et al, 1995).
    2) STROPHANTUS TINCTURE: A 76-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and congestive heart failure, who had been on a homeopathic preparation of strophanthus tincture (15 drops daily) for many years, developed vomiting dyspnea and bradycardia (40 beats/minute) after ingesting the recently refilled preparation from a pharmacy. Her ECG revealed third-degree heart block, atrial fibrillation with many PVCs; digoxin level was 0.4 ng/mL. She was placed on an external pacemaker and was given 5 vials (200 mg) of intravenous Digibind(R). Within 30 minutes, ECG showed normal sinus rhythm without further ECG abnormalities. The authors suggested that Digibind(R) may be useful in the treatment of Strophanthus poisoning despite low digoxin levels (Ogunlana et al, 2000).
    B) ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CERBERA MANGHAS: A 50-year-old man intentionally ingested 3 cerebra manghas seeds and within approximately 2 hours he developed a heart rate of 22 beats/minute with complete atrioventricular block. The patient was hemodynamically stable and did not require atropine or temporary pacing. Following supportive care to treat hyperkalemia the patient fully recovered with no sequelae (Tsai et al, 2008).
    b) CERBERA MANGHAS: In Sri Lanka, a man died approximately 5 hours after ingestion of cerbera manghas fruit (also known as natchchukkai seeds in this region). Bradycardia (40 beats/minute), hypotension (100/60 mmHg) and drowsiness were observed upon admission. Atropine was administered. However, the patient developed severe bradycardia with third degree AV block followed by ventricular fibrillation, which did not respond to treatment (Eddleston & Haggalla, 2008).
    C) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) OLEANDRIN - A 49-year-old man with diabetes and coronary heart disease drank an infusion from leaves which he thought would treat his diabetes and developed complete heart block, ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest. Despite aggressive care, the patient died within a few hours. Postmortem blood analysis revealed the presence of oleandrin at a concentration of 10 ng/mL (Wasfi et al, 2008).
    b) DIGITALIS PURPUREA - A 64-year-old man intentionally ingested a whole digitalis purpurea (digitoxin) plant and was initially asymptomatic. On presentation, repeated doses of activated charcoal were given. ECG changes occurred about 5 hours after exposure, but the patient remained hemodynamically stable. Ten vials (the entire hospital supply) of Digibind were given at the onset of ECG changes. Within 30 minutes of developing bradycardia, followed by a sinus pause, the patient went into cardiac arrest, which did not respond to resuscitation (Ramlakhan & Fletcher, 2007). Significant amounts of plant material were found during postmortem exam.
    D) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension may result from the bradycardia or dysrhythmias (Eddleston & Haggalla, 2008; Newman et al, 2004; Haynes et al, 1985; Gupta et al, 1997; Tracqui et al, 1998).
    E) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild hypertension (149/85) was reported in a 42-year-old female who had been exposed to smoke from burning oleander prunings. The patient's hypertension resolved upon supportive care (Khasigian et al, 1998).
    F) ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ATRIAL FIBRILLATION with nonspecific ST segment changes and intraventricular conduction delays were seen more than 12 hours postingestion of an oleander tea (Driggers et al, 1989).
    b) STROPHANTUS TINCTURE - Chronic ingestion of a homeopathic preparation of strophanthus tincture resulted in third-degree heart block, atrial fibrillation with many PVCs in a 76-year-old female with a history of hypertension and congestive heart failure Within 30 minutes of receiving 5 vials of Digibind(R), ECG showed normal sinus rhythm without further ECG abnormalities (Ogunlana et al, 2000).
    G) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Decreased QRS-T interval, T wave flattening or inversion, an irregular ventricular rate, and an increased PR interval have been noted (Gupta et al, 1997; Rich et al, 1993; Driggers et al, 1989).
    b) DIGITALIS LANATA: Multiple ECG disturbances including complete heart block and ST and T wave changes were reported in two patients following ingestion for three days of an herbal supplement used as a laxative. One patient had an elevated serum digoxin level of 3.09 ng/mL. Subsequent analysis of the herbal supplement, labeled as plantain, showed that the actual ingredient was digitalis lanata (Slifman et al, 1998).
    c) NERIUM OLEANDER: A 66-year-old woman experienced profound bradycardia and multiple ECG abnormalities (brief PAT followed by AV block then a junctional escape rhythm with PVCs) following the ingestion of unprocessed Nerium oleander leaves. A second 26-year-old patient developed similar AV block with intermittent asystolic periods along with a junctional escape rhythm and nonspecific ST and T wave abnormalities (Graeme et al, 1998).
    d) NERIUM OLEANDER/TRANSDERMAL: A 59-year-old man with a history of psoriasis developed bradycardia (heart rate 26 beats/minute) after using homemade lotion which he made by boiling Nerium oleander blooms and leaves twice with water. The patient applied this lotion twice daily. ECG revealed a new third-degree AV block with a broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block (LBBB); a previous ECG showed a normal sinus rhythm with first-degree AV block and LBBB. A temporary pacemaker was implanted in the ICU. Because of persistent third-degree block, a definitive DDDR pacemaker was implanted 4 days later. He recovered and was discharged 4 days after the implantation. On follow-up exam, 3 months later, his ECG showed normal sinus rhythm with LBBB (Wojtyna & Enseleit, 2004).
    e) CERBERA ODOLLAM: Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel (Gaillard et al, 2004).
    f) FOXGLOVE: A 53-year-old woman presented with persistent nausea and vomiting. An ECG showed sinus bradycardia (36 beats/minute) with non-specific ST-T wave abnormalities. It was determined, through detailed questioning, that the patient had ingested foxglove that was mistakenly used in a salad. Laboratory analysis showed a serum digitoxin level of 43 ng/mL (therapeutic range 10 to 32 ng/mL), confirming the diagnosis of foxglove poisoning. With supportive care, the patient's bradycardia and gastrointestinal symptoms gradually resolved (Newman et al, 2004).
    g) LILY OF THE VALLEY: Significant conduction disturbances (Grade I-II atrioventricular block) have been reported in children following the ingestion of small amounts of Lily-of-the-valley (Haugen et al, 2001).
    1) CASE REPORT: After ingesting 8 to 10 flowers from Lily-of-the-valley, a 6-year-old boy was admitted to hospital. On admission, ECG revealed sinus rhythm with a PQ-time of 0.17 seconds and incomplete right branch block. After treatment with gastric lavage and activated charcoal, his PQ-time increased to 0.20 seconds without any dysrhythmias (Haugen et al, 2001).
    2) CASE REPORT: After ingesting 1 to 2 flowers from Lily-of-the-valley, a 6-year-old boy was admitted to hospital. On admission, ECG revealed sinus rhythm with 110 beats/min and a PQ-time of 0.18 seconds. After treatment with gastric lavage, his PQ-time increased to 0.40 seconds without dysrhythmias (Haugen et al, 2001).
    3) CASE REPORT: After chewing on a leaf from Lily-of-the-valley, a 4-year-old boy was treated with activated charcoal and admitted to hospital. He experienced 4 episodes of grade II AV-block (Haugen et al, 2001).
    H) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Three children developed tachycardia after ingesting Lily-of-the-valley (Bruneton, 1999).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INJURY OF UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) IRRITATION: Inhalation of plant dust composed of tiny leaf particles may be irritating to people while raking dried leaves.
    B) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) STROPHANTUS TINCTURE: Chronic ingestion of a homeopathic preparation of strophanthus tincture resulted in shortness of breath in a 76-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and congestive heart failure (Ogunlana et al, 2000).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FATIGUE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) WEAKNESS: Fatigue, lethargy, malaise, and confusion (particularly in elderly patients) are common (Porter et al, 1999; LoVecchio et al, 1998; Gupta et al, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old woman presented to the ED with malaise, lethargy, vomiting, and blurred vision. She had ingested approximately 2.8 g twice daily of Chomper(R), an herbal supplement with plantain as the key ingredient, for 3 days prior to presentation. An ECG revealed normal sinus rhythm with a "digitalis-effect" in the precordial leads. The patient's serum digitalis level was 4.2 ng/mL. Following supportive care, the patient was discharged 2 days later with a normal ECG and a serum digitalis level of 0.7 ng/mL. A subsequent enzyme immunoassay of a Chomper(R) tablet showed that digitalis lanata was the ingredient within the tablet, instead of plantain (LoVecchio et al, 1998).
    B) DROWSY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 13-month-old child was lethargic, pale, vomited and cried inconsolably after a possible ingestion of a material that was later identified as an oleander plant. The patient's level of consciousness deteriorated within minutes following presentation to the ED. The patient gradually recovered (Gupta et al, 1997).
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 55-year-old woman became comatose and developed complete AV block 9 hours after a squill plant ingestion. Despite aggressive supportive treatment, the patient died approximately 30 hours after ingestion (Tuncok et al, 1995).
    D) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Headache has been reported.
    E) DISTURBANCE IN SPEECH
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) DYSPHONIA: Slurred speech may be noted (La Couteur & Fisher, 2002; Haynes et al, 1985).
    F) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Toxic seizures were noted in a 96-year-old woman who ingested oleander leaves (Osterloh et al, 1982), and in a patient following a squill plant ingestion (Tuncok et al, 1995).
    G) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dizziness is common (La Couteur & Fisher, 2002; Porter et al, 1999; Khasigian et al, 1998).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman presented to the ED 2 days after developing severe dizziness that worsened upon movement. Upon admission to the ED, the patient also experienced a brief syncopal episode. The patient admitted to burning oleander prunings and was periodically exposed to the smoke. A digoxin assay performed 48 hours post-exposure measured at 0.3 ng/mL (Khasigian et al, 1998).
    H) PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) One child developed asthenia and agitation after ingesting Lily-of-the-valley (Bruneton, 1999).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Patients may develop vomiting, dry mouth, abdominal cramping shortly after ingestion which may continue for several hours preceding deterioration in myocardial contractility (Ogunlana et al, 2000; Porter et al, 1999; Lacassie et al, 2000; Bruneton, 1999; Shumaik et al, 1988; Gupta et al, 1997; Tracqui et al, 1998; Tuncok et al, 1995; Graeme et al, 1998).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman presented to the ED with a two-day history of nausea, continued vomiting, dizziness, and a brief syncopal episode. The patient's symptoms developed shortly after exposure to smoke from burning oleander prunings. Forty-eight hours post-exposure to the oleander smoke, a digoxin assay was measured at 0.3 ng/mL. The patient recovered following treatment with intravenous prochlorperazine and hydroxyzine given intramuscularly (Khasigian et al, 1998).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old woman ingested approximately 2.8 g twice daily for three days of Chomper(R), an herbal supplement with plantain as the key ingredient, and presented to the ED with complaints of emesis, malaise, lethargy, and blurred vision. The patient's serum digitalis level was 4.2 ng/mL. Subsequent analysis of the Chomper(R) tablet revealed that digitalis lanata was inadvertently substituted for plantain as the key ingredient (LoVecchio et al, 1998).
    d) Slifman et al (1998) described two patients who presented to the ED with complaints of nausea, vomiting, and cardiac disturbances. One of the patients had an elevated serum digoxin level of 3.09 ng/mL that was unresponsive to digoxin immune Fab therapy. The patient's serum digoxin level subsequently decreased (1.91 ng/mL) with cholestyramine treatment. Prior to administration, both patients had ingested an herbal supplement for a total of three days before discontinuing due to persistent vomiting.
    1) Subsequent analysis of the herbal supplement labeled as plantain showed that the actual ingredient was digitalis lanata (Slifman et al, 1998).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 5-year-old child developed vomiting after ingesting 15 berries of Lily-of-the-valley (Bruneton, 1999).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 2 month history of nausea, anorexia, colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, confusion, metallic taste, dry mouth, sore throat, dizziness, distal paresthesias, tremor, and episodes of slurred speech with blurred, yellow-orange vision. Police investigation revealed that the wife attempted to poison him by using water boiled with roots of Nerium oleander for making coffee over an eight-week period (La Couteur & Fisher, 2002).
    g) CASE REPORT (FOXGLOVE): A 53-year-old woman presented with persistent nausea and vomiting. Prior to admission, the patient had been vomiting approximately every hour for 18 hours. An ECG showed sinus bradycardia (36 bpm) with non-specific ST-T wave abnormalities. It was determined, through detailed questioning, that the patient had ingested foxglove that was mistakenly used in a salad. Laboratory analysis showed a serum digitoxin level of 43 ng/mL (therapeutic range 10 to 32 ng/mL), confirming the diagnosis of foxglove poisoning. With supportive care, the patient's bradycardia and gastrointestinal symptoms gradually resolved (Newman et al, 2004).
    h) CERBERA ODOLLAM: Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel (Gaillard et al, 2004).
    B) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/NERIUM OLEANDER: Profuse diarrhea and significant hypokalemia (2.7 mEq/L) occurred in a 52-year-old man with schizoaffective disorder who was seen ingesting the leaves of a bush one day prior to admission. Symptoms were severe enough to require placement of a rectal tube. His hospital course was complicated by aspiration pneumonia, but no long term sequelae was reported. The plant was later identified as white oleander (Nerium oleander) which the patient thought was an herb and had no intent to harm himself (Boswell et al, 2013).
    C) MELENA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A young Haitian woman received an oral and rectal concoction of oleander leaf extract and developed malaise and bloody stools (Blum & Rieders, 1987).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Contact dermatitis has been reported from skin contact with the leaves (Apted, 1983).
    B) ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Three children developed rash after ingesting Lily-of-the-valley (Bruneton, 1999).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) For acute cardiac glycoside exposure, serum potassium is the best marker of toxicity. Serum potassium should be monitored every 60 minutes following any potentially significant acute exposure to a cardiac glycoside. Serum potassium is NOT predictive of toxicity for chronic cardiac glycoside toxicity.
    B) Monitor serial s serum electrolytes every hour, until patient is improved. Although non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may produce a detectable serum digoxin concentration, the quantitative results are not reliable; while a measurable digoxin concentration may confirm exposure, the quantitative concentration cannot be used to guide therapy.
    C) Monitor renal function.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECG's.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) SERUM POTASSIUM: For acute cardiac glycoside exposure, serum potassium is the best marker of toxicity. Serum potassium should be monitored every 60 minutes following any potentially significant acute exposure to a cardiac glycoside. Serum potassium is NOT predictive of toxicity for chronic cardiac glycoside toxicity.
    a) Serum potassium has reached levels as high as 13.5 mEq/L at 4-1/2 hours after intravenous injection of digoxin. A peak level of 8.2 mEq/liter at 14 hours after ingestion has been survived.
    2) SERUM DIGOXIN: A measurable serum digoxin concentration may confirm exposure, but the quantitative result cannot be used to guide therapy. Although non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may produce a detectable serum digoxin concentration, the quantitative results are not reliable.
    3) Fab FRAGMENTS -
    a) Serum digoxin concentration can be clinically misleading when digoxin Fab fragments are present because the Fab fragments interfere with digitalis immunoassay measurements (Personal Communication, 1989).
    b) An evaluation of 28 assay methods showed 7 methods that could accurately measure free digoxin in the presence of Fab fragments. These assays were (Hansell, 1989):
    1) Abbott PEG
    2) Baxter Healthcare STRATUS
    3) Becton Dickinson ARIA HT
    4) Becton Dickinson ARIA II
    5) Becton Dickinson Solid Phase
    6) Leeco Diagnostics
    7) Nuclear Medical Laboratories
    c) Unbound, biologically active digoxin was accurately measured in the presence of Fab in serum obtained from a 19-month-old child by the Stratus(R) fluorometric enzyme immunoassay (Baxter) (Senecal et al, 1991).
    d) RENAL FAILURE: One case of a patient in renal failure whose free serum digoxin concentration rose fourfold 5 days after Fab administration has been reported. The authors attributed this rise to possible Fab fragment/digoxin complex dissociation after ruling out other possible causes. They suggest that patients with renal failure who are treated with Fab fragments should have free serum digoxin concentration monitored (Schneider et al, 1991).
    e) Hypoglycemia (43 mg/dL) was noted 13 hours after administration of digoxin immune Fab fragments in a one-week-old infant, despite intravenous glucose administration (42 mg/kg/min) (Kaufman et al, 1990).
    4) Monitor renal function.
    B) TOXICITY
    1) DIGITOXIN: Therapeutic range of DIGITOXIN OR DIGITALIS LEAF is 19.7 to 39.3 nmol/L. In a typical oleander poisoning, serum oleandrin concentrations may reach 174 mmol/L or more(Dasgupta & Hart, 1997).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECG's.

Methods

    A) IMMUNOASSAY
    1) GENERAL
    a) Estimations of cardiac glycosides are available in most hospitals by using immunoassays of varying specificity. Although the actual measurement does not correlate to clinical toxicity, a numeric result indicates the presence of a cardiac glycoside.
    b) TDx(R) (Abbott Laboratories) and DADE STRATUS(R) METHODS - Banner et al (1989) compared two immunoassays for digoxin in the presence of Fab fragments; the Abbott TDx(R) and the Dade Stratus(R) methods. Serum spiked with digoxin 0 to 50 ng/mL and Fab 0 to 3 mcg/mL was assayed by TDx with and without ultrafiltration, and by Stratus. TDx was found to accurately quantitate total serum digoxin concentrations (ie, both bound and non-bound by Fab), whereas Stratus measured only non-bound drug. After ultrafiltration, the TDx assay measured non-Fab-bound digoxin levels.
    2) HERBAL PRODUCTS
    a) HERBAL PRODUCT: In a case of poisoning from an herbal cleansing preparation, serum digoxin concentration measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbot TDx(R)) was 1.7 ng/mL. Further serum analysis with a more digoxin-specific immunoassay (Tina Quant digoxin assay) measured a concentration of 0.34 ng/mL, and an enzyme immunoassay for digitoxin revealed a concentration of 20 ng/mL. The use of a second digoxin immunoassay with different specificity allows the identification of non-digoxin cardiac glycosides because the reading on the two assays will be significantly different (Barrueto et al, 2003)
    3) DIGITALIS PURPUREA/FOXGLOVE
    a) DIGITALIS PURPUREA (FOXGLOVE): If a digitalis purpurea (purple foxglove) overdose is suspected, symptoms of intoxication will not likely correspond with serum digoxin levels (Ramlakhan & Fletcher, 2007). Because this plant contains no digoxin, only slight cross-reactivity may take place (Dickstein & Kunkel, 1980) between the digoxin assay and the cardiac glycosides present (mainly digitoxin and gitoxin).
    b) In a non-fatal case of intoxication with foxglove, Microparticule Enzyme Immuno-Assay was used to measure digitoxin level in serum (162 nmol/L (124 mcg/L)) (Lacassie et al, 2000).
    4) OLEANDER GLYCOSIDES
    a) Glycosides found in oleander may cross-react with antibodies found in most radioimmunoassay kits and result in digoxin being reported as present (Lacassie et al, 2000; Haynes et al, 1985; Shumaik et al, 1988). There is no correlation of the serum level in these cases to toxicity (Osterloh, 1988). The Abbott TDx analyzer used with Digoxin II reagents, may qualitatively identify other cardiac glycosides as well, but the concentration relationship is not linear (Cheung et al, 1989).
    1) Cross-reactivity of digoxin antibodies between oleander glycosides and digoxin in the radioimmunoassay has been demonstrated (Haynes et al, 1985; Shumaik et al, 1988). This assay will detect oleander glycosides and may be helpful in diagnosis of oleander ingestion, but serum levels and toxicity do not necessarily correlate (Osterloh et al, 1982).
    b) FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY (FPIA): The presence of cardiac toxins oleandrin and oleandrigenin were found to be detectable in blood by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for digitoxin. However, if a patient is receiving digoxin or digitoxin and then ingests Nerium oleander plant, serum digoxin or digitoxin concentrations are expected to be falsely elevated (Dasgupta & Emerson, 1998).
    c) DIGOXIN III (Abbott Laboratories) - A new immunoassay (Digoxin III), which uses a polyclonal rabbit antibody against digoxin, has been shown to detect oleander. It was found to be more sensitive than FPIA or Digoxin II assay(s) in detecting oleandrin in serum pools supplemented with pure oleandrin or oleander extract. A potential advantage of Digoxin III is that it requires no specimen pretreatment and results are usually obtained sooner than with FPIA (Dasgupta et al, 2008). The authors concluded that this assay may be useful for monitoring an oleander exposure.
    B) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) A method for measuring concentrations of oleandrin by thin-layer chromatography and fluorescence spectrophotometry was described by Blum & Rieders (1987).
    2) Various primary and secondary cardiac glycosides from Digitalis purpurea have been separated and quantitated using high-performance liquid chromatography (Wichtl et al, 1982).
    3) Reverse-phase HPLC and HPLC/MS methods were used to confirm the possibility of oleander poisoning (Pietsch et al, 2005; Gupta et al, 1997; Tracqui et al, 1998).
    4) In a non-fatal case of intoxication with foxglove, blood and urine were assayed for 17 cardiotonic hetorosides, using a highly specific liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). In addition, serum and urine specimens were analyzed by liquid chromatography-electrospray-mass spectrometry (LC-ES-MS) (Lacassie et al, 2000).
    C) OTHER
    1) A field test was developed to determine the cardenolide content of various Asclepias species, but can be used for other cardenolide-containing plant families.
    2) TNDP (2,2,4,4-tetranitrodiphenyl) is impregnated on Whatman Number 1 filter paper. A drop of fresh latex is placed on the paper. A drop of 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide is then added. Appearance of a blue color is a positive reaction (1 to 2 minutes). The color varies in intensity with total cardenolide content. The test is sensitive to 0.057% cardenolides (Sady & Seiber, 1991).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Admit all patients, who develop dysrhythmias, heart block, severe vomiting, or who require digoxin immune Fab treatment, to an ICU setting.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Healthy asymptomatic children with taste/exploratory ingestions of Lily of the valley or oleander (Nerium oleander) can be monitored at home with telephone follow up and referral to a health care facility of symptoms (nausea, vomiting, lethargy) develop.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who have only GI symptoms and a clearly decreasing serum digoxin concentration can be discharged after a minimum of 8 hours of observation.

Monitoring

    A) For acute cardiac glycoside exposure, serum potassium is the best marker of toxicity. Serum potassium should be monitored every 60 minutes following any potentially significant acute exposure to a cardiac glycoside. Serum potassium is NOT predictive of toxicity for chronic cardiac glycoside toxicity.
    B) Monitor serial s serum electrolytes every hour, until patient is improved. Although non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may produce a detectable serum digoxin concentration, the quantitative results are not reliable; while a measurable digoxin concentration may confirm exposure, the quantitative concentration cannot be used to guide therapy.
    C) Monitor renal function.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECG's.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION RECOMMENDATIONS
    1) Administration of activated charcoal and whole gut lavage may be preferable to emesis.
    B) CHILDREN
    1) Healthy asymptomatic children with a history of taste/exploratory ingestions of Lily of the valley or oleander (Nerium oleander) are unlikely to develop toxicity and do not require gastrointestinal decontamination (Haugen et al, 2001; Krenzelok et al, 1996). Children with more substantial ingestions or taste ingestions of more toxic species such as yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) should be referred to a health care facility. Refer to "Plants-Thevetia" document for information on exposures to Yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).
    C) ADULTS
    1) Adults with a history of ingestion of deliberate ingestion of a cardiac glycoside should be referred to a hospital for evaluation and treatment.
    D) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Emesis is not recommended for cardiac glycoside ingestion.
    E) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Patients with a history of a significant ingestion of a cardiac glycoside-containing plant should receive activated charcoal. Gastric lavage is of limited benefit in patients ingesting plant parts, particularly children, because the of the size of the plant parts relative to the lavage tube. Gastric lavage may worsen bradycardia secondary to vagal stimulation (Hobson & Zettner, 1973).
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    3) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    a) Experimental studies on the use of multiple dose activated charcoal to enhance elimination have demonstrated efficacy of this treatment and are summarized below. Routine use of this treatment is NOT recommended (Anon, 1999). Consider administration of a second dose of activated charcoal in patients with large ingestions, significant toxicity, or when anti-digoxin Fab is not available.
                    DIGOXIN
                 Type of Study
    Human Overdoses*   Human volunteers**
     Lake 1984  (1)     Park 1985    (2)
     Boldy 1985         Lalonde 1985
     Vicas 1987
    (1) patient in renal failure
    (2) enhanced digoxin clearance only in one
    renal failure patient
                    DIGITOXIN
                  Type of Study
    Human overdoses*   Human volunteers**
     Pond 1981          Park 1985
    *Includes deliberate and iatrogenic overdoses,
    orally and intravenous.
    **Includes oral and intravenous dosing.
    

    C) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) Whole gut lavage may be useful in removing plant material from the gastrointestinal tract after large ingestions.
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) For acute cardiac glycoside exposure, serum potassium is the best marker of toxicity. Serum potassium should be monitored every 60 minutes following any potentially significant acute exposure to a cardiac glycoside. Serum potassium is NOT predictive of toxicity for chronic cardiac glycoside toxicity.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes every hour, until patient is improved. Although non-digoxin glycosides (such as oleander) may produce a detectable serum digoxin concentration, the quantitative results are not reliable.
    a) There is a cross-reactivity of OLEANDER cardiac glycosides with various digoxin or digitoxin immunoassays(Osterloh et al, 1982; Shumaik et al, 1988; Dasgupta & Datta, 1998) and this assay may be helpful in the diagnosis of oleander ingestion.
    3) Monitor renal function.
    4) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECG's.
    B) DIGOXIN IMMUNE FAB (OVINE)
    1) EFFICACY
    a) CASE REPORT/OLEANDER: Fab fragments may have provided benefit in an adult who had asymptomatic sinus bradycardia secondary to a large ingestion of oleander leaves (Nerium oleander). The heart rate prior to administration of 5 vials of Digibind(R) was 30 to 45, after treatment the rate was 56 (Shumaik et al, 1988). More studies are needed to determine if FAB fragments are clinically useful in the treatment of oleander poisoning.
    b) They have also been effective in treating a patient with lanatoside C intoxication (Hess et al, 1979), and oleander poisoning (Shumaik et al, 1988), and have been shown to interact with a number of other plant extracts containing cardiac glycosides (Cheung et al, 1991).
    c) Specific antibodies have been successfully used in the management of severe acute digoxin and digitoxin poisoning in children (Zucker et al, 1982; Murphy et al, 1982; Rossi et al, 1984; Woolf et al, 1990), in premature infants with renal failure (Presti et al, 1985; Menget et al, 1989), and adults (Smith et al, 1976; Leikin et al, 1985; Schaumann et al, 1986; Smolarz et al, 1985; Spiegel & Marchlinski, 1985).
    d) Martin-Dupont et al (2000) reported that the efficacy of the Fab therapy is questionable because of the risk of cross-reactivity with a variety of plant cardiac glycosides and with compounds unrelated to digoxin and digitoxin(Lacassie et al, 2000).
    e) In a 36-year-old woman poisoned with an herbal preparation marketed for "internal cleansing" possibly contaminated with Digitalis lanata, an empiric 10 vials of digoxin-specific Fab were found to be beneficial in resolving the clinical symptoms (Barrueto et al, 2003).
    f) CERBERA ODOLLAM: A 51-year-old woman developed severe bradycardia (heart rate: 30 beats/minute), hypotension (BP 90/60 mmHg) and an abnormal ECG (including atrial flutter with variable atrioventricular block, slow ventricular response, shortened QT interval and peaked T-waves) after intentionally ingesting an unknown amount of seeds from a Cerbera odollam ("Pong-pong") tree that was purchased via the Internet. Hyperkalemia (7.5 mmol/L) and an elevated creatinine (2.6 mg/dL) were found on laboratory exam. A digoxin level was undetectable (less than 0.3 ng/mL) and a toxicology screen was noncontributory. Supportive therapy included atropine, calcium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, glucose and insulin therapy. She also received 10 vials of digoxin immune Fab resulting in normal sinus rhythm with further improvement of other ECG findings. She received an additional 10 vials of digoxin immune Fab with complete resolution of ECG abnormalities within 24 hours. The patient recovered completely (Kassop et al, 2014).
    g) FOXGLOVE: A 46-year-old Asian female developed nausea, vomiting, lethargy, dizziness, and weakness after ingesting 4 large foxglove leaves 4 hours previously. Her ECG revealed sinus and junctional bradycardia (transiently dipped into the 30s) with intermittent second degree AV block. Her digoxin and potassium levels were 0.8 ng/mL (normal levels 1.9 or less) and 4.5 mEq/L, respectively. She was treated with 2 vials of Digibind(R) approximately 24 hours postingestion. Since her bradycardia and AV block persisted and her digoxin level did not change, she was treated with 2 additional vials of Digibind(R) approximately 48 hours postingestion, without notable effect. She was discharged 2 days later with transient AV block. The authors believed that in the case of foxglove ingestion, the measured digitalis level does not necessarily reflect all of the cardiac alkaloids that are present in serum (Porter et al, 1999).
    h) A 22-year-old man presented to the emergency department after an intentional overdose of a homemade foxglove extract. Clinical symptoms with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia and ECG changes were consistent with cardiac glycoside poisoning. Treatment with digoxin-specific Fab fragments resulted in transient clinical and ECG improvement. The use of Fab did not result in a shortened clinical course in this episode of foxglove poisoning, as one would expect in the setting of commercial glycoside product poisoning (Rich et al, 1993)
    i) STROPHANTUS TINCTURE: A 76-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and congestive heart failure, who had been on a homeopathic preparation of strophanthus tincture (15 drops daily) for many years in Hungary, developed vomiting dyspnea and bradycardia (40 bpm) after ingesting the recently refilled preparation from a pharmacy. Her ECG revealed third-degree heart block, atrial fibrillation with many PVCs; digoxin level was 0.4 ng/mL. She was placed on an external pacemaker and was given 5 vials (200 mg) of intravenous Digibind. Within 30 minutes, ECG showed normal sinus rhythm without further ECG abnormalities. The authors suggested that Digibind may be useful in the treatment of Strophanthus poisoning despite low digoxin levels (Ogunlana et al, 2000).
    j) A dramatic and rapid reversal of advanced cardiac rhythm disturbances (accelerated AV junctional rhythm, AV junctional tachycardia, various severe ventricular dysrhythmias) and hyperkalemia was reported in 21 of 26 patients with advanced life threatening digitalis intoxication following the administration of Fab fragments of digoxin specific antibodies (Smith et al, 1982).
    k) In a multicenter study of 63 patients with digoxin or digitoxin toxicity, a positive, dramatic response from Fab fragments occurred in 53. Seven patients were excluded for various reasons. Diagnosis was uncertain in the 3 treatment failures. Response was usually within 30 minutes of administration (Wenger et al, 1985).
    l) ANIMALS: Digoxin specific antibodies have been shown to reverse toxicity and prevent mortality in animals given a lethal dose of digoxin (Schmidt & Butler, 1971; Hess et al, 1979; Hess et al, 1980; Ochs & Smith, 1977; Lechat et al, 1984); and oleander (Clark et al, 1991).
    1) In animals Fab fragments were faster and more efficacious than intact IgG in reversing dysrhythmias (Lloyd & Smith, 1978).
    2) INDICATIONS
    a) Treatment with Fab fragments should be considered in those severely intoxicated patients who fail to respond to immediately available conventional therapy as outlined below or in patients who meet the criteria listed below.
    b) Manifestations of severe toxicity might include severe ventricular dysrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), progressive bradydysrhythmias (severe sinus bradycardia), or second or third degree heart block not responsive to atropine (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    c) Digoxin Fab fragments are indicated if the potassium concentration exceeds the upper limit of the normal range (5.5 mEq/L in adults or 6 mEq/L in children) in association with severe digitalis intoxication (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    d) Patients taking digoxin therapeutically may become toxic with ingestions of smaller amounts.
    e) In symptomatic cases of poisoning by an unknown pharmacologically active cardiac glycoside, one study recommends the administration of an empiric 10 vials of digoxin-specific Fab (Barrueto et al, 2003).
    3) ADMINISTRATION/DOSE
    a) ADMINISTRATION: Administer intravenously over 30 minutes, infused through a 0.22 micron membrane filter. If cardiac arrest is imminent, a bolus injection can be given. Reconstitute each vial in 4 milliliters of sterile water for injection to provide a solution containing approximately 10 mg/mL of digoxin immune Fab (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    b) Intraosseous Fab fragments were ineffective in reversing digitalis toxicity in an animal model. This route of administration is not recommended.
    c) Interpretation of serum digoxin concentrations after plant ingestions is difficult and they should not be used to guide therapy. The ideal dose for these patients in unknown, an initial dose of 2 vials is reasonable, titrate further doses to clinical condition. Administer 10 to 20 vials for critically ill patients or patients in cardiac arrest (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    d) Fab fragments will not cross-react with the structurally related drugs spironolactone, testosterone, or cortisone (Zalcberg et al, 1983).
    4) PRECAUTIONS
    a) HYPOKALEMIA
    1) Serum potassium may drop precipitously after digoxin immune Fab (DigiFab(R)) administration and must be monitored frequently especially for several hours post administration (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    b) SERUM CONCENTRATIONS
    1) Serum digitalis levels will reflect both bound (inactivated) and unbound glycoside after digoxin immune Fab is given. Reliable levels may take several days or a week or longer in patients with renal failure (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    2) Serum digoxin concentration measurements may be clinically misleading until Fab fragments are eliminated from the body (Prod Info DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, 2012).
    c) APNEA: A neonate developed transient apnea during the Fab infusion (Antman et al, 1990).
    d) HYPOGLYCEMIA: Developed in a one-week-old infant 13 hours after administration of 40 milligrams of digoxin immune Fab fragments for treatment of an estimated overdose of 600 micrograms given over 7 days for treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, despite intravenous glucose administration (Kaufman et al, 1990).
    e) SKIN TESTING: May be appropriate for high risk patients (known allergy to sheep proteins or previous treatment with Digoxin Immune Fab (ovine)), but is not recommended in most cases.
    1) The skin test procedure consists of intradermal injection or the scratch technique using 1:100 dilution of reconstituted digoxin immune Fab in normal saline. This dilution is made by normal reconstitution (final concentration is 10 milligrams/milliliter). Add 0.1 milliliter of this solution to 10 milliliters of normal saline. A dose of 0.1 milliliter of the 1:100 solution is injected intradermally and read after 20 minutes.
    2) In the postmarketing surveillance study of 717 adults treated with Digibind(R), there were 6 patients that developed allergic reactions. Five of the 6 patients developed skin reactions. One patient developed angioneurotic edema that was controlled with diphenhydramine (Smith, 1989; (Hickey et al, 1991).
    3) In the postmarketing surveillance study 2 patients received a repeat dose without adverse reaction (Smith, 1989).
    f) CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE: May be precipitated in patients who require digitalis to maintain cardiac output who are then given Fab fragments (Antman et al, 1990).
    g) DISEASE STATE
    1) Concomitant diseases may alter the kinetics of digoxin Fab fragments. Nollet et al (1989) reported the presence of Fab fragments in the blood for 142 days after a single dose of 160 milligrams in a 4-year-old child with a complex form of a cyanotic congenital heart disease for a presumed accidental ingestion of her digoxin. The half-life of the Fab fragments was estimated to be 15.6 days. She also had concomitant liver disease, hepatitis A and B infections.
    h) RECRUDESCENT TOXICITY: Patients receiving less than the estimated adequate dose of Fab were more likely to experience recrudescent toxicity (Hickey et al, 1991).
    i) The incidence of recrudescent toxicity was 3 percent in a study of 77 adults.
    j) The onset of recrudescent toxicity was frequently within 3 days of the initial treatment of Fab. One case of recrudescent toxicity occurred as late as 11 days.
    5) RENAL FAILURE
    a) Dialysis is probably first-line therapy to restore potassium to normal levels in an anephric patient. Digoxin and the digoxin immune Fab complex are believed to be poorly dialyzable due to molecular weights in excess of 500 as well as due to extensive tissue binding of digoxin and the large volume of distribution of digoxin (Clifton et al, 1989).
    b) In an anephric patient, one might predict failure to clear the Fab/digoxin complex. The reticuloendothelial system has been suggested as a mechanism to eliminate the complex (Prod Info Digibind, 94). The elimination half-life will probably be delayed in these patients.
    c) The question of whether this delay in elimination would lead to release of newly unbound digoxin into the blood should also be a consideration in the use of digoxin Fab fragment therapy in functionally anephric patients (Prod Info DIGIBIND(R) IV injection, 2003).
    6) BINDING
    a) Digoxin binding to digoxin Fab fragment was observed to be virtually irreversible in a 2-year-old for 19 days postingestion (Hewett et al, 1989).
    b) Rebound of free digoxin levels has been frequently reported following Fab fragment administration (Sinclair et al, 1989; Hursting et al, 1987; Hewett et al, 1989). Peak rebound levels usually occur within 24 hours, but may be delayed. If the measurement of free digoxin is not available, the decision to administer additional Fab fragments should be made on clinical grounds.
    C) HYPERKALEMIA
    1) Hyperkalemia following acute overdose may be life threatening. Digitalis-induced hyperkalemia is an indication for Fab fragments, which will rapidly reverse the hyperkalemia.
    2) NOTE: Hyperkalemia from digitalis toxicity is secondary to movement of potassium out of cells. Total body potassium depletion can occur from excessive correction of hyperkalemia. Both Fab fragments and glucose, insulin, and bicarbonate should not be used simultaneously, as hypokalemia could occur.
    3) The emergency management of life-threatening hyperkalemia (potassium levels greater than 6.5 milliequivalents/liter), in the event digoxin immune Fab fragments are not readily available, includes intravenous administration of bicarbonate, glucose, and insulin (Bayer, 1991a) (DOSE: administer 0.2 unit/kilogram of regular insulin with 200 to 400 milligrams/kilogram glucose intravenously) (dextrose 50 percent in water). Concurrent administration of intravenous sodium bicarbonate (about 1 milliequivalent/kilogram up to 44 milliequivalents/dose in an adult) may be of additive value in rapidly lowering serum potassium levels.
    4) Monitor ECG while administering glucose, insulin, and sodium bicarbonate. This therapy should lower the serum potassium level for up to 12 hours.
    5) CALCIUM: The effects of cardiac glycosides on the myocardium are increased by elevated serum calcium levels. Administration of parenteral calcium to a digitalized patient should be accomplished with extreme caution, to avoid the possible precipitation of cardiac dysrhythmias. If necessary, calcium should be administered slowly and in small quantities (Hansten & Horn, 1989; Zucchero & Hogan, 1990).
    D) ANTIARRHYTHMIC
    1) ATROPINE
    a) Atropine is useful in the management of bradycardia, and varying degrees of heart block due to the digitalis-induced effects of enhanced vagal tone on SA node rhythmicity and on conduction through the AV node (Smith & Willerson, 1971; Duke, 1972).
    2) DOSE
    a) ATROPINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    a) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    E) ANTIARRHYTHMIC
    1) PHENYTOIN
    a) Phenytoin is useful in the management of digitalis induced ventricular dysrhythmias (PVCs, ventricular tachycardia and bigeminy) and improves conduction through the AV node (Damato et al, 1970; Helfant et al, 1967).
    b) Low dose phenytoin (ADULT: 25 milligrams/dose intravenously at 1 to 2 hour intervals; CHILD: 0.5 to 1 milligram/kilogram/dose intravenously at 1 to 2 hour intervals) appears to improve AV conduction (Rumack et al, 1974).
    c) Larger doses are needed for the management of ventricular dysrhythmias: LOADING DOSE FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN: Administer 15 mg/kg up to 1 gram IV not to exceed a rate of 0.5 mg/kg/min. MAINTENANCE DOSE: ADULT: Administer 2 mg/kg IV every 12 hours as needed; CHILD: Administer 2 mg/kg every 8 hours as needed.
    d) MONITOR SERUM PHENYTOIN LEVELS just prior to initiating and during maintenance therapy to assure therapeutic levels of 10 to 20 mcg/mL (39.64 to 79.28 nanomoles/liter). Monitor ECG carefully.
    F) ANTIARRHYTHMIC
    1) LIDOCAINE
    a) Lidocaine is useful in the management of ventricular tachydysrhythmias, PVCs, and bigeminy. Lidocaine does not improve conduction through the AV node.
    b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    G) ANTIARRHYTHMIC
    1) MAGNESIUM
    a) Magnesium has been reported to reverse digoxin induced dysrhythmias (French et al, 1984; Neff et al, 1972; Reisdorff et al, 1986; Kinlay & Buckley, 1995). It should be used extremely cautiously if at all in the presence of renal failure.
    b) DOSE: ADULT: 20 mL of 20% solution over 20 minutes by slow infusion. Infusion should be stopped if patient vomits, becomes hypotensive, develops worsening heart block, or loses deep tendon reflexes. Magnesium levels in serum should be followed.
    H) ANTIARRHYTHMIC
    1) AMIODARONE
    a) Ventricular fibrillation refractory to cardioversion and lidocaine was successfully treated with amiodarone 300 milligrams intravenously in a 26-year-old man who ingested 25 milligrams of digoxin (Maheswaran et al, 1983).
    b) Amiodarone was also successful in treating a 61-year-old man with digoxin toxicity resistant to lidocaine and phenytoin (Nicholls et al, 1985).
    I) EMERGENCY CARDIAC PACEMAKER
    1) Insertion of a pacemaker should be considered in those patients with severe bradycardia and/or slow ventricular rate due to second degree AV block who fail to respond to atropine and/or phenytoin drug therapy (Citrin et al, 1973; Bismuth et al, 1977; Schwartz, 1977).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) FORCED DIURESIS
    1) Furosemide-induced forced diuresis has been reported to enhance excretion by some authors (Rotmensch et al, 1978; Koren & Klein, 1988), while others have shown no effect (Semple et al, 1975; Brown et al, 1976).
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis is ineffective in removing cardiac glycosides but may assist in restoring serum potassium to normal levels.
    C) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Hemoperfusion removes less than 1 percent of the total ingested dose of digoxin (Warren & Fanestil, 1979). Mathiew et al (1983) treated 11 patients with an amberlite XAD 4 resin column and increased the spontaneous rate of digitoxin removal by 8.6 times with one column and 14 times with two. Serum level reduction was 32 percent with one column and 59 percent with two.
    2) CHARCOAL HEMOPERFUSION: The plasma half-life of digitoxin was reduced from 145 hours to 20 hours in a woman who ingested 10 milligrams (Gilfrich et al, 1979). During 8 hours of hemoperfusion 1.24 milligrams of the drug was removed and 0.87 milligram was removed by a second run. The authors estimated that the body burden at the time of hemoperfusion was 3.9 milligrams, thus 50% was removed by these procedures.
    a) Hemoperfusion has also been reported for digoxin toxicity (Smiley et al, 1978; Marbury et al, 1979; Gibson, 1980; Suzuki et al, 1988).
    b) The pharmacokinetic data obtained from two of the cases (Smiley et al, 1978), however, would seem to indicate that only small amounts of digoxin can be removed by hemoperfusion and the procedure may therefore not be useful (Freed et al, 1979).
    3) Hemoperfusion through small columns which contained antidigoxin antibodies bound to polyacrolein microspheres in agarose macrospheres (APAMB) reported effective treatment in 10 patients with moderate to severe adverse effects resulting from digitalis (Savin et al, 1987).
    a) The procedure was well tolerated and no adverse effects to formed blood elements were detected (Savin et al, 1987).
    b) Up to 130 milliliters/minute mean whole blood digoxin clearance was reported (Savin et al, 1987).
    c) Up to 87 milliliters/minute mean plasma digoxin clearance was reported (Savin et al, 1987).
    D) PLASMA EXCHANGE
    1) Multiple plasma exchange did not significantly alter digoxin kinetics and had a slight effect on digitoxin. The estimated fraction of the body burden removed by one exchange was 5.5 percent for digitoxin and 1.2 percent for digoxin (Keller et al, 1985).
    E) HEMOFILTRATION
    1) Hemofiltration was used to treat a patient with chronic renal failure who developed hyperkalemia and complete heart block associated with a digoxin level of 3.2 nanograms/milliliter (4.1 nanomoles/liter). Hyperkalemia corrected within 6 hours and heart block resolved 12 hours after continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (Lai et al, 1986).

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) NERIUM OLEANDER: A 30-year-old woman ingested a tea made from Nerium oleander leaves. Shortly after drinking the tea she developed nausea and a numb tongue and then vomiting. About 10 hours after ingestion she presented with bradycardia (30 bpm), tachypnea, and a nonpalpable blood pressure. Extensive resuscitative efforts were ineffective. Postmortem digoxin level was 6.4 ng/mL (Haynes et al, 1985).
    2) Oleander leaf extract given orally plus rectally produced a generalized malaise and bloody stools. The patient died despite 20 vials of Digibind(R) and supportive care (Blum & Rieders, 1987).
    3) Ingestion of 7 Nerium oleander seeds produced a serum digoxin level of 5.69 nmol/L about 8 hours postingestion. Symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and stomach cramps were seen. On admission her heart rate was 40 beats/min and she had depressed ST-segments and preterminal inverted T-waves. Treatment administered included atropine for bradycardia and cardiac monitoring. The patient was discharged, still with ST-depression, 5 days later (Romano & Mombelli, 1990).
    4) FOXGLOVE: An 85-year-old man ingested a tea from foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). It had a bitter taste and only one cup was consumed. Within a few hours he developed weakness, nausea, vomiting, and yellow halos around objects. On arrival in the ER he had a normal sinus rhythm with prolonged PR intervals and ST depression. He developed an initial ventricular tachycardia. On day 2, he developed a junctional rhythm with a heart rate of 40 beats/min and frequent PVC's. Serum digitoxin levels peaked at 59.0 on day three. He recovered fully with reversion to a normal sinus rhythm on day 6. Nausea and visual effects were gone by day 4 (Dickstein & Kunkel, 1980).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: There is a great variability in the response following the ingestion of cardiac glycoside containing plant material. Observation of the patient for clinical effects is probably most useful in estimating amount of material ingested. Life threatening toxicity is rare, and generally occurs only in adults after deliberate ingestions of large quantities of plant material, or in those who are using methods which can extract high concentrations of glycosides from plant materials (eg making decoctions, infusions or extracts).
    B) PEDIATRIC: Serious poisoning rarely develops after "taste" ingestions of whole plant material by children. Taste/exploratory ingestions of Lily of the valley or oleander (Nerium oleander) are unlikely to result in toxicity.
    1) A 5-year-old child only developed vomiting after ingesting 15 berries of Lily-of-the-valley.
    C) CERBERA ODOLLAM: Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel.
    D) Life threatening poisoning has been reported after ingestion of plant extracts and teas, use of contaminated herbal products, and deliberate ingestion of substantial quantities of plant parts by adults.
    1) DIGITALIS PURPUREA: An adult died approximately 5 hours after intentionally ingesting a whole digitalis purpurea plant.
    2) THEVETIA PERUVIANA: Ingestion of a few seeds of yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana) can cause severe toxicity or death. Refer to PLANTS-THEVETIA document for information on exposures to yellow oleander (Thevetia peruviana).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) There is marked variability in response following ingestion of cardiac glycoside containing plant leaves, stems, etc., depending upon the season, age of plant, humidity, etc. Observation of the patient for the clinical effects is probably the most useful since laboratory estimation will not be of much value.
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) DIGITALIS PURPUREA: A 64-year-old man intentionally ingested a whole digitalis purpurea (digitoxin) plant and was initially asymptomatic. On presentation, repeated doses of activated charcoal were given. ECG changes occurred about 5 hours after exposure, but the patient remained hemodynamically stable. A short time later the patient developed bradycardia which progressed to sinus pause and cardiac arrest within 30 minutes. Resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful (Ramlakhan & Fletcher, 2007).
    2) OLEANDER: In a fatal case where a Haitian woman in her 20's took an unknown amount of oleander leaf extract both orally and rectally, the concentration of oleandrin found in blood and tissues on autopsy ranged from 10 to 39 mcg/g (Blum & Rieders, 1987).
    3) SQUILL: A 55-year-old woman ingested 2 bulbs of a squill plant and, within 24 hours, became comatose and developed complete AV block and ventricular arrhythmias. Despite aggressive supportive treatment, patient died 30 hours after ingestion (Tuncok et al, 1995).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) SUMMARY: Seven leaves (size unknown) of Nerium oleander produced bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, and stomach cramps (Romano & Mombelli, 1990).
    2) HERBAL SUPPLEMENT: Two patients, a 31-year-old woman and her husband, ingested approximately 16.9 grams and 38 grams, respectively, of Chomper(R), an herbal bulk-forming laxative with the key ingredient of plantain, and subsequently developed vomiting, lethargy, and cardiac disturbances. The serum digoxin levels, of both patients, were elevated. An enzyme immunoassay method was performed on a Chomper(R) tablet which determined that digitalis lanata was mistakenly substituted for plantain (LoVecchio et al, 1998).
    3) NERIUM OLEANDER: Profuse diarrhea and significant hypokalemia (2.7 mEq/L) occurred in a 52-year-old man with schizoaffective disorder who was seen ingesting the leaves of a bush one day prior to admission. Symptoms were severe enough to require placement of a rectal tube. His hospital course was complicated by aspiration pneumonia, but no long term sequelae was reported. The plant was later identified as white oleander (Nerium oleander) which the patient thought was an herb and had no intent to harm himself (Boswell et al, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC: Serious poisoning rarely develops after "taste" ingestions of whole plant material by children. Taste/exploratory ingestions of Lily of the valley or oleander (Nerium oleander) are unlikely to result in toxicity (Haugen et al, 2001; Krenzelok et al, 1996). A 5-year-old child developed only vomiting after ingesting 15 berries of Lily-of-the-valley (Bruneton, 1999).
    5) CERBERA ODOLLAM: Sinus bradycardia, wandering pacemaker, second-degree SA block and nodal rhythm, nausea, retching and vomiting have occurred following the ingestion of half to one odollam kernel (Gaillard et al, 2004).
    6) FOXGLOVE: A 36-year-old woman developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and cardiovascular shock with sinus bradycardia (38 bpm) after ingesting a concoction of foxglove leaves in a suicide attempt (Lacassie et al, 2000).
    a) Using a Microparticule Enzyme Immuno-Assay, the apparent digitoxin level in serum was 162 nmol/L (124 mcg/L). At hour 30, the peak urine concentrations for gitaloxin and digitoxin were 91.3 and 69.9 ng/mL, respectively. The serum concentrations of digitalis glycosides were maximum on the first day (gitoxin 13.1 ng/mL, digitoxin 112.6 ng/mL, digitoxigenin 3.3 ng/mL, and digitoxigenin mono-digitoxoside 8.9 ng/mL) and decreased over the next five days. On the fifth day only, a peak gitaloxin level (112.6 ng/mL) was observed. Health status improved after treatment with atropine, dimeticone, alginic acid and metoclopramide (Lacassie et al, 2000).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) GENERAL
    a) The therapeutic reference range for digoxin is 0.9 to 2.0 ng/mL (Slifman et al, 1998).
    b) The therapeutic reference range for digitoxin is 10 to 32 ng/mL (Newman et al, 2004).
    1) Digoxin and digitoxin assays can only be used qualitatively in patients with exposures from cardiac glycoside-containing plants. As the cross reactivity of the various glycosides with the assays is not known, there is no reliable association with the measured digoxin or digitoxin concentration and the presence of clinical toxicity.
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) SURVIVORS
    a) A 23-year-old woman presented to the ED with persistent nausea and vomiting, lethargy, and irregular heartbeats. The patient had admitted to ingesting an herbal supplement, used as a laxative, for a total of 3 days but had discontinued its use due to persistent vomiting. The patient's serum digoxin level was 3.66 ng/mL. The herbal supplement was subsequently identified as containing digitalis lanata instead of the labeled ingredient of plantain (Slifman et al, 1998).
    b) The serum digoxin levels, in a 31-year-old woman and her husband, were 4.2 ng/mL and 5.2 ng/mL, respectively, after ingestion of an herbal laxative mistakenly containing digitalis lantana instead of plantain (LoVecchio et al, 1998).
    c) A 53-year-old woman presented with persistent nausea and vomiting. An ECG showed sinus bradycardia (36 bpm) with nonspecific ST-T wave abnormalities. It was determined, through detailed questioning, that the patient had ingested foxglove that was mistakenly used in a salad. Laboratory analysis showed a serum digitoxin level of 43 ng/mL (therapeutic range: 10 to 32 ng/mL), confirming the diagnosis of foxglove poisoning. With supportive care, the patient's bradycardia and gastrointestinal symptoms gradually resolved (Newman et al, 2004).
    2) FATALITIES
    a) A 49-year-old man with a history of diabetes ingested an infusion that contained oleander to aid with his diabetes. The patient died within a few hours of ingestion. Antemortem blood samples demonstrated the presence of oleandrin at a concentration of approximately 10 ng/mL (in a previously published nonfatal oleander poisoning a serum concentration of oleandrin was 1.6 ng/mL) (Wasfi et al, 2008).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Acute poisoning is much different from chronic exposure to cardiac glycosides such as digoxin and digitoxin. There is a marked high grade heart block with significant interference of the sodium-potassium pump mechanism mediated by ATP-ase.
    B) With the decrease in intracellular potassium, electrical conduction is interfered with and there are progressive electrical changes. There is a reduction in the normal resting membrane potential with the decreased ability of the myocardial cells to act as pacemakers and eventually a complete loss of normal myocardial electrical function with asystole occurs.
    C) Marked overdosage results in hyperkalemia and loss of excitability of cardiac tissue. There is significant difficulty managing severe overdose due to the inactivity of the myocardial muscle. The myocardium may even lose its ability to respond to electrical pacing.

Clinical Effects

    11.1.2) BOVINE/CATTLE
    A) Four cows developed anorexia, weakness, depression, diarrhea and arrhythnias (second degree AV block, AV dissociation, atrial fibrillation, PVCs and ventricular tachycardial) after consuming fodder containing large quantities of dried oleander leaves.
    B) The three-day-old calf of one of the cows developed second degree AV block, suggesting possible transfer of oleander glycosides through the milk or transplacentally (Rezakhani & Mahm, 1992).
    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) CONVALLARIA MAJALIS -
    1) A dog suspected of ingesting an undetermined amount of leaves of Convallaria majalis died in seizures. At necropsy severe, diffuse, hepatic congestion, and caudal vena cava distention were noted. The thymus was also congested and had disseminated petechial hemorrhages. Congestion was noted in the mesenteric and ileocecal lymph nodes and the serosa of the greater curvature of the stomach. The epicardium was mottled and had alternating band-like pale and congested areas in the ventricles. Gross and microscopic lesions seen indicated cardiac shock. Leaves of C. majalis were found in the middle part of the jejunum (Moxley et al, 1989).

Treatment

    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) CAT
    1) A case of oleander toxicity was successfully treated with dipotassium edetate (Burton et al, 1965).
    B) DOG
    1) Antidigoxin-Fab fragments appeared to be efficacious in treating the arrhythmias and hyperkalemia induced by Nerium oleander. The dose used was high, 1.5 vials of antidigoxin-Fab/kilogram (Clark et al, 1990).
    C) CATTLE
    1) Atropine 0.04 mg/kg subcutaneously was not effective in treating arrhythmias in four oleander poisoned cows. Ruminal acidification was begun with 1 to 2 liters of vinegar (diluted 2 to 3 times) twice a day with improvement in signs and symptoms after 2 days. Vinegar administration was continued once a day for 5 days (Rezakhani & Mahm, 1992).

General Bibliography

    1) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    2) Anon: Position statement and practice guidelines on the use of multi-dose activated charcoal in the treatment of acute poisoning. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37(6):731-751.
    3) Antman EM, Wenger TL, & Butler VP Jr: Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digitoxin-specific fab antibody fragments. Circulation 1990; 81:1744-1752.
    4) Apted J: Oleander dermatitis (letter). Contact Dermatitis 1983; 9:321.
    5) Bain RJI: Accidental digitalis poisoning due to drinking herbal tea. Br Med J 1985; 290:1624.
    6) Barrueto F, Jortani SA, Valdes R, et al: Cardioactive steroid poisoning from an herbal cleansing preparation. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 41:396-399.
    7) Bayer MJ: Recognition and management of digitalis intoxication: implications for emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med 1991a; 9:29-32.
    8) Bismuth C, Motte G, Conso F, et al: Acute digitoxin intoxication treated by intracardiac pacemaker: experience in sixty-eight patients. Clin Toxicol 1977; 10:443-456.
    9) Blum LM & Rieders F: Oleandrin distribution in a fatality from rectal and oral Nerium oleander extract administration. J Anal Toxicol 1987; 11:219-221.
    10) Boswell BR, Dorweiler MA, Erbs NC, et al: A case of Nerium oleander toxicity: a thorny predicament. Psychosomatics 2013; 54(4):379-381.
    11) Brown DB, Dormois JC, & Abraham GN: Effect of furosemide on the renal excretion of digoxin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1976; 20:395-400.
    12) Bruneton J: Toxic plants. Dangerous to humans and animals, Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France, 1999.
    13) Burton LE, Picchioni AL, & Chin L: Dipotassium edetate as an antidote in poisoning from oleander and its chief glycoside, oleandrin. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 1965; 158:202-211.
    14) Cheung K, Hinds JA, & Duffy P: Detection of poisoning by plant-origin cardiac glycosides with the Abbott TDx analyzer. Clin Chem 1989; 35:295-297.
    15) Cheung K, Urech R, & Taylor L: Plant cardiac glycosides and digoxin Fab antibody. J Paediatr Child Health 1991; 27:312-313.
    16) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    17) Citrin DL, O'Malley K, & Hillis WS: Cardiac standstill due to digoxin poisoning successfully treated with atrial pacing. Br Med J 1973; 2:526-527.
    18) Clark RF, Selden BS, & Curry SC: Antidigoxin-FAB fragments in the treatment of a canine model of oleander toxicity (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1990; 32:353.
    19) Clark RF, Selden BS, & Curry SC: Digoxin-specific Fab fragments in the treatment of oleander toxicity in a canine model. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:1073-1077.
    20) Clifton GD, McIntyre WJ, & Zannikos PN: Free and total serum digoxin concentrations in a renal failure patient after treatment with digoxin immune fab. Clin Pharm 1989; 8:441-445.
    21) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    22) Damato AN, Berkowitz WD, & Patton RD: The effect of diphenylhydantoin on atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction in man. Am Heart J 1970; 79:51-56.
    23) Dasgupta A & Datta P: Rapid detection of cardioactive bufalin toxicity using fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin. Ther Drug Monitor 1998; 20:104-108.
    24) Dasgupta A & Emerson L: Neutralization of cardiac toxins oleandrin, oleandrigenin, bufalin, and cinobufotalin by digibind:monitoring the effect by measuring free digitoxin concentrations. Life Sci 1998; 63(9):781-788.
    25) Dasgupta A & Hart AP: Rapid detection of oleander poisoning using fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin. Effect of treatment with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragment (ovine). Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108(4):411-416.
    26) Dasgupta A, Risin SA, Reyes M, et al: Rapid detection of oleander poisoning by Digoxin III, a new Digoxin assay: impact on serum Digoxin measurement. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129(4):548-553.
    27) Dickstein ES & Kunkel FW: Foxglove tea poisonings. Am J Med 1980; 69:167-169.
    28) Driggers DA, Solbrig K, & Steiner JF: Acute oleander poisoning. West J Med 1989; 151:660-662.
    29) Duke M: Atrioventricular block due to accidental digoxin ingestion treated with atropine. Am J Dis Child 1972; 124:754-756.
    30) Eddleston M & Haggalla S: Fatal injury in eastern Sri Lanka, with special reference to cardenolide self-poisoning with Cerbera manghas fruits. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(8):745-748.
    31) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    32) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    33) Freed CR, Gerber JG, & Gal J: Hemoperfusion in drug overdose (letter). JAMA 1979; 241:1575.
    34) French JH, Thomas RG, & Siskind AP: Magnesium therapy in massive digoxin intoxication. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13:562-566.
    35) Fuller TC & McClintock E: Poisonous Plants of California, University of California Press, Berkley, CA, 1986.
    36) Gaillard Y, Krishnamoorthy A, & Bevalot F: Cerbera odollam: a 'suicide tree' and cause of death in the state of Kerala, India. J Ethnopharmacol 2004; 95(2-3):123-126.
    37) Gibson TP: Hemoperfusion of digoxin intoxication. Clin Toxicol 1980; 17:501-513.
    38) Gilfrich HJ, Kasper W, & Meinertz T: Successful treatment of massive digitoxin overdose by charcoal hemoperfusion. Vet Hum Toxicol 1979; 21(Suppl):18-19.
    39) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    40) Gowda RM, Cohen RA, & Khan IA: Toad venom poisoning: resemblance to digoxin toxicity and therapeutic implications. Heart 2003; 89:e14.
    41) Graeme KA, LoVecchio FA, Selden BS, et al: Cardiotoxicity from ingestion of unprocessed nerium oleander leaves treated with FAB fragments (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:457.
    42) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    43) Griffiths B, Willms L, & Jayathissa S: AV conduction block and proximal myopathy induced by Gee's cough linctus. N Z Med J 2009; 122(1293):3557-.
    44) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    45) Gupta A, Joshi P, Jortani SA, et al: A case of nondigitalis cardiac glycoside toxicity. Ther Drug Monit 1997; 19:711-714.
    46) Hansell JR: Effect of therapeutic digoxin antibodies on digoxin assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989; 113:1259-1262.
    47) Hansten PD & Horn JR: Drug Interactions, 6th ed, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1989.
    48) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    49) Haugen S, Bryne E, & Falke M: Grade I-II atrioventricular block following Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis) intake: a report of three cases. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39(3):303.
    50) Haynes BE, Bessen HA, & Wightman WD: Oleander tea: herbal draught of death. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:350-353.
    51) Helfant RH, Scherlag BJ, & Damato AN: The electrophysiological properties of diphenylhydantoin sodium as compared to procainamide in the normal and digitalis-intoxicated heart. Circulation Res 1967; 21:757-765.
    52) Hess T, Scholtysik G, & Riesen W: The effectiveness of digoxin-specific F(ab')2-antibody fragments in the treatment of digitoxin poisoning: experimental investigations in the cat. Eur J Clin Invest 1980; 10:93-97.
    53) Hess T, Stucki P, & Barandun S: Treatment of a case of lanatoside C intoxication with digoxin-specific F(ab')2 antibody fragments. Am Heart J 1979; 98:767-770.
    54) Hewett DD, Kearns GL, & Moss MM: Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of digoxin fab fragments in massive digoxin overdose (abstract). Clin Res 1989; 37:48a.
    55) Hickey AR, Wenger TL, & Carpenter VP: Digoxin immune fab therapy in the management of digitalis intoxication: safety and efficacy results of an observational surveillance study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:590-598.
    56) Hobson JD & Zettner A: Digoxin serum half-life following suicidal digoxin poisoning. JAMA 1973; 223:147-149.
    57) Hollman A: Plants and cardiac glycosides. Br Heart J 1985; 54:258-261.
    58) Hursting MJ, Raisys VA, & Opheim KE: Determination of free digoxin concentrations in serum for monitoring Fab treatment of digoxin overdose. Clin Chem 1987; 33:1652-1655.
    59) Kamel MS, Assaf MH, Abe Y, et al: Cardiac glycosides from Cryptostegia grandiflora. Phytochemistry 2001; 58(4):537-542.
    60) Kassop D, Donovan MS, Cohee BM, et al: An unusual case of cardiac glycoside toxicity. Int J Cardiol 2014; 170(3):434-437.
    61) Kaufman J, Leikin J, & Kendzierski D: Use of digoxin fab immune fragments in a seven-day-old infant. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6(2):118-121.
    62) Keller F, Kreutz G, & Vohringer H: Effect of plasma exchange on the steady-state kinetics of digoxin and digitoxin. Clin Pharmacokinet 1985; 10:514-523.
    63) Khasigian P, Everson G, Bellinghausen R, et al: Poisoning following oleander smoke inhalation (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:456-457.
    64) Kingsbury JM: Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.
    65) Kinlay S & Buckley NA: Magnesium sulfate in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias due to digoxin toxicity. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33(1):55-59.
    66) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    67) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    68) Koren G & Klein J: Enhancement of digoxin clearance by mannitol diuresis: in vivo studies and their clinical implications. J Vet Hum Toxicol 1988; 30:25-27.
    69) Krenzelok EP, Jacobsen TD, & Aronis JM: Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis) exposures: are the outcomes consistent with the reputation?. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:601.
    70) La Couteur DG & Fisher AA: Chronic and criminal administration of Nerium oleander. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(4):523-524.
    71) Lacassie E, Marquet P, & Martin-Dupont S: A non-fatal case of intoxication with foxglove, documented by means of liquid chromatography- electrospray-mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45(5):1154-1158.
    72) Lai KN, Swaminathan R, & Pun CO: Hemofiltration in digoxin overdose. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:1219-1220.
    73) Lampe KF & McCann AM: AMA Handbook of Poisonous and Injurious Plants, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1985.
    74) Lechat P, Mudgett-Hunter M, & Margolies MN: Reversal of lethal digoxin toxicity in guinea pigs using monoclonal antibodies and Fab fragments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984; 229:210-213.
    75) Lei ZH, Nakayam H, Kuniyasu A, et al: Cardiac glycosides from Erysimum cheiranthoides. Chem Pharm Bull 2002; 50(6):861-862.
    76) Leikin J, Vogel S, & Graft J: Use of Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies in the therapy of massive digoxin poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:175-178.
    77) Lloyd BL & Smith TW: Contrasting rates of reversal of digoxin toxicity by digoxin-specific IgG and Fab fragments. Circulation 1978; 58:280-283.
    78) LoVecchio F, Seby MV, & Johnson D: Digitalis poisoning following the ingestion of an herbal dietary supplement (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:457.
    79) Maheswaran R, Bramble MG, & Hardisty CA: Massive digoxin overdose - successful treatment with intravenous amiodarone. Br Med J 1983; 287:392.
    80) Marbury T, Mahoney J, & Juncos L: Advanced digoxin toxicity in renal failure: treatment with charcoal hemoperfusion. South Med J 1979; 72:279-286.
    81) Menget A, Burguet A, & Fromentin C: (Efficacy of anti-digoxin antibodies in a premature neonate). Efficacite des anticorps antidigoxine chez un nouveau-ne prematurissime. Arch Fr Pediatr 1989; 46:701-702.
    82) Moxley RA, Schneider NR, & Steinegger DH: Apparent toxicosis associated with lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria majalis) ingestion in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195:485-487.
    83) Murphy DJ, Bremmer WF, & Haber E: Massive digoxin poisoning treated with Fab fragments of digoxin specific antibodies. Pediatrics 1982; 70:472-473.
    84) Neff MS, Mendelssohn S, & Kim KE: Magnesium sulfate in digitalis toxicity. Am J Cardiol 1972; 29:377-382.
    85) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    86) Newman LS, Feinberg MW, & LeWine HE: Clinical problem solving. A bitter tale. N Eng J Med 2004; 351:594-599.
    87) Nicholls DP, Murtagh JG, & Holt DW: Use of amiodarone and digoxin specific Fab antibodies in digoxin overdosage. Br Heart J 1985; 53:462-464.
    88) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    89) Ochs HR & Smith TW: Reversal of advanced digitoxin toxicity and modification of pharmacokinetics by specific antibodies and Fab fragments. J Clin Invest 1977; 60:1303-1313.
    90) Ogunlana V, Caraccio T, & Mofenson H: Use of digoxin immune Fab in strophanthus poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38(5):519.
    91) Osterloh J, Scott H, & Pond S: Oleander interference in the digoxin radioimmunoassay in a fatal ingestion. JAMA 1982; 247:1596.
    92) Osterloh J: Cross-reactivity of oleander glycosides (letter). J Anal Toxicol 1988; 12:53.
    93) Pearn J: Oleandor poisoning. In: Covacevich J, Davie P & Pearn J (Eds): Toxic Plants and Animals. A Guide for Australia, QLD Museum, Brisbane, Austrailia, 1987.
    94) Personal Communication: Personal Communication: Dr Rober Long, PhD, Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989.
    95) Pietsch J, Oertel R, Trautmann S, et al: A non-fatal oleander poisoning. Int J Legal Med 2005; 119:236-240.
    96) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    97) Porter R, Schultz D, & Robertson WO: Alternative medicine toxicity: digitalis poisoning!. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:617.
    98) Presti S, Friedman D, & Saslow J: Digoxin toxicity in a premature infant: treatment with Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies. Pediatr Cardiol 1985; 6:91-94.
    99) Product Information: DIGIBIND(R) IV injection, digoxin immune fab (ovine) IV injection. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2003.
    100) Product Information: DigiFab(R) intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution, digoxin immune fab ovine intravenous injection lyophilized powder for solution. BTG International Inc. (per manufacturer), West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
    101) Product Information: Digibind. Burroughs Wellcome, Canada, 94.
    102) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    103) Radford DJ, Gillies AD, & Hinds JA: Naturally occurring cardiac glycosides. Med J Aust 1986; 144:540-544.
    104) Ramlakhan SL & Fletcher AK: It could have happened to Van Gogh: a case of fatal purple foxglove poisoning and review of the literature. Eur J Emerg Med 2007; 14(6):356-359.
    105) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    106) Reisdorff EJ, Clark MR, & Walters BL: Acute digitalis poisoning: the role of intravenous magnesium sulfate. J Emerg Med 1986; 4:463-469.
    107) Rezakhani A & Mahm M: Oleander poisoning in cattle of Fars Province, Iran. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:549.
    108) Rich SA, Libera JM, & Locke RJ: Treatment of foxglove extract poisoning with digoxin-specific Fab fragments. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22(12):1904-1907.
    109) Romano GA & Mombelli G: Intoxikation mit oleanderblattern. Schweiz Med Wschr 1990; 120:596-597.
    110) Rossi R, Leititis JU, & Hagel KJ: Severe digoxin intoxication in a child treated by infusion of digoxin-specific Fab-antibody-fragments. Eur J Pediatr 1984; 142:138-140.
    111) Rotmensch HH, Graff E, & Terdiman R: Furosemide-induced forced diuresis in digoxin intoxication. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:1495-1497.
    112) Rumack BH, Wolfe RR, & Gilfrich H: Diphenylhydantoin (Phentoin) treatment of massive digoxin overdose. Br Heart J 1974; 36:405-408.
    113) ST&T Research International: Science profile and clinical review Nerium AD – Age Defying Cream. ST&T Research International, San Francisco, CA, 9/15/2011.
    114) Sady MB & Seiber JN: Field test for screening milkweed latex for cardenolides. J Nat Prod 1991; 54:1105-1107.
    115) Savin H, Marcus L, & Margel S: Treatment of adverse digitalis effects by hemoperfusion through columns with antidigoxin antibodies bound to agarose polyacrolein microsphere beads. Am Heart J 1987; 113:1078-1084.
    116) Schaumann W, Kaufmann B, & Neubert P: Kinetics of the Fab fragments of digoxin antibodies and of bound digoxin in patients with severe digoxin intoxication. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 30:527-533.
    117) Schmidt DH & Butler VP: Reversal of digoxin toxicity with specific antibodies. J Clin Invest 1971; 50:1738-1743.
    118) Schneider PJ, McCollam PL, & Osborn JJ: Possible dissociation of the Digibind-digoxin complex in renal failure. DICP 1991; 25:1269.
    119) Schwartz HS: Digitalis intoxication and poisoning. JACEP 1977; 6:168-171.
    120) Semple P, Tilstone WJ, & Lawson DH: Furosemide and urinary digoxin clearance. N Engl J Med 1975; 293:612-613.
    121) Senecal PE, Kearney TE, & Osterloh JD: Does serum digoxin concentration rise after Digibind(R) (abstract)?. Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:375.
    122) Shumaik GM, Wu AW, & Ping AC: Oleander poisoning: treatment with digoxin-specific Fab Antibody Fragments. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:732-735.
    123) Simpkiss M & Holt D: Digitalis poisoning due to the accidental ingestion of foxglove leaves. Ther Drug Monitor 1983; 5:217.
    124) Sinclair AJ, Hewick DS, & Johnston PC: Kinetics of digoxin and anti-digoxin antibody fragments during treatment of digoxin toxicity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 28:352-356.
    125) Slifman NR, Obermeyer WR, & Musser SM: Contamination of botanical dietary supplements by Digitalis lanata. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:806-811.
    126) Smiley JW, March NM, & Del Guercio ET: Hemoperfusion in the management of digoxin toxicity. JAMA 1978; 240:2736-2737.
    127) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    128) Smith TW & Willerson JT: Suicidal & accidental digoxin ingestion. Circulation 1971; 44:29.
    129) Smith TW, Butler VP Jr, & Haber E: Treatment of life threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin specific Fab antibody fragments: experience in 26 cases. N Engl J Med 1982; 307:1357-1362.
    130) Smith TW, Haber E, & Yeatman L: Reversal of advanced digoxin intoxication with Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies. N Engl J Med 1976; 294:797-800.
    131) Smolarz A, Roesch E, Lenz E, et al: Digoxin specific antibody (Fab) fragments in 34 cases of severe digitalis intoxication. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1985; 23:327-340.
    132) Spiegel A & Marchlinski FE: Time course for reversal of digoxin toxicity with digoxin-specific antibody fragments. Am Heart J 1985; 109:1397-1399.
    133) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    134) Suzuki A, Yoshida H, & Goto M: Digoxin intoxication and hemoperfusion (letter). Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1988; 22:633.
    135) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    136) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    137) Tracqui A, Kintz P, & Branche F: Confirmation of oleander poisoning by HPLC/MS. Int J Legal Med 1998; 111:32-34.
    138) Tsai YC, Chen CY, Yang NI, et al: Cardiac glycoside poisoning following suicidal ingestion of Cerbera manghas. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(4):340-341.
    139) Tuncok Y, Kozan O, Cavdar C, et al: Urginea maritima (squill) toxicity. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:83-86.
    140) Warren SE & Fanestil DD: Digoxin overdose. Limitations of hemoperfusion- hemodialysis treatment. JAMA 1979; 242:2100-2101.
    141) Wasfi IA, Zorob O, Al katheeri,NA, et al: A fatal case of oleandrin poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 179(2-3):e31-e36.
    142) Wenger TL, Butler VP, & Haber E: Treatment of 63 severely digitalis-toxic patients with digoxin-specific antibody fragments. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:118A-123A.
    143) Wichtl M, Wichtl-Bleier W, & Mangkudidjojo M: J Chromatogr 1982; 247:359.
    144) Wojtyna W & Enseleit F: A rare cause of complete heart block after transdermal botanical treatment for psoriasis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004; 27(12):1686-1688.
    145) Woolf AD, Wenger T, & Smith TW: Efficacy of anti-digoxin antibodies in serious pediatric digitalis poisoning (Abstract 1). Vet Hum Toxicol 1990; 32:341.
    146) Zalcberg JR, Healey K, & Hurrell JGR: Monoclonal antibodies to drugs - digoxin. Int J Immunopharmacol 1983; 5:397-402.
    147) Zucchero FJ & Hogan MJ: Evaluation of Drug Interactions, PDS Publishing Company, St Louis, Missouri, 1990.
    148) Zucker AR, Lacina SJ, DasGupta DS, et al: Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies used to reverse ventricular fibrillation induced by digoxin ingestion in a child.. Pediatrics 1982; 70(3):468-71.
    149) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.