6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED 1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002). 1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis. 2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
2) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information. 2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
A) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED 1) EMESIS: Ipecac-induced emesis is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
B) GASTRIC LAVAGE 1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes). a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
2) PRECAUTIONS: a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage. b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
3) LAVAGE FLUID: a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear. b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance. c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
4) COMPLICATIONS: a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001). b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
2) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information. 2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
6.5.3) TREATMENT
A) DEXTROSE 1) Intravenous infusions of glucose have resulted in dramatic clinical recovery (Hassal et al, 1954) (Hill et al, 1955), but have also failed to prevent a fatality (Jelliffe & Stuart, 1954). The symptoms of hypoglycemia following ackee poisoning can be exacerbated by malnutrition. Animal experiments have shown that the mechanism of action of hypoglycin is not that of insulin. Rabbits poisoned by hypoglycin have died in spite of glucose injection (Chin et al, 1957). 2) Recent case series suggest that survival in children with hypoglycemia from ackee fruit ingestion is dependent on treatment with intravenous dextrose within the first 2 to 3 hours after the onset of symptoms (Quere et al, 1999). 3) ANIMAL STUDY: In one study, the efficacy of methylene blue (MB; 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mg/kg every 30 minutes) and glucose (G; 10%; 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 g/kg IP every 2 hours over a 6 hour period), alone and in combination (MB plus G), as a treatment for ackee apple poisoning was evaluated in mice (144 mice; 6 groups of 24 mice). The main outcomes of the study were early mortality (until day 3) and late mortality (day 14) (Barennes et al, 2004). a) Glucose was more effective than MB and had the same survival as MB in conditions of early treatment. Overall, more mice survived in G and G plus MB groups than in MB group (75% and 25%, respectively). Survival in the G alone group was the same as survival in the G plus MB group. Hepatitis or hepatic cirrhosis did not occur in animals from any groups. The authors recommended early sugar, glucose, or dextrose administration in the field (Barennes et al, 2004).
B) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE BALANCE REGULATION 1) Fluids and electrolytes should be monitored. Excessive loss may occur due to profuse vomiting.
C) SEIZURE 1) SUMMARY a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol. b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures. c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
2) DIAZEPAM a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003). b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008). c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012). b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
4) LORAZEPAM a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008). b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012). c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
5) PHENOBARBITAL a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012). b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012). c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011). d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011). e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003). f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
6) OTHER AGENTS a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012): 1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012). 2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011). 3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011). 4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
D) VITAMIN B COMPLEX 1) Vitamin B deficiencies are often associated with ackee fruit poisoning. Teratogenesis in animals can be prevented by pretreatment with riboflavin phosphate (Persaud, 1971). Animal studies of hypoglycin poisoning suggests that riboflavin and glycine may be useful following human ackee exposure (Sherratt & Turnbull, 1999). The proposed mechanism of action of this tetratogensis is the same as that of the hypoglycemic effect (Keeler & Tu, 1983), therefore, vitamin B supplements should be considered. 2) There are no clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of treatment with riboflavin, but Hill (1952) and Hill et al (1955) recommended it on an empiric basis before the mechanism of action was known.
E) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY 1) L-CARNITINE: Several animal studies have addressed the use of L-carnitine for treatment of hypoglycin-induced hypoglycemia. Mice given L-carnitine have shown both positive and negative responses to this agent (Borum, 1983; Entman & Bressler, 1967; Marley & Sherratt, 1973). The effectiveness of this agent has not been assessed in humans (Di Palma, 1987). 2) METHYLENE BLUE: Based on the biochemical similarities between ackee poisoning and ifosfamide encephalopathy, methylene blue has been suggested as a possible treatment in potentially fatal encephalopathy that can occur after exposure (Kupfer & Idle, 1999). Methylene blue may restore hepatic gluconeogenesis by oxidizing NADH to NAD. Theoretically, the use of methylene blue in combination with riboflavin may help to promote new flavoprotein synthesis during the early stages of endemic encephalopathy. 3) ANIMAL STUDY: In one study, the efficacy of methylene blue (MB; 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mg/kg every 30 minutes) and glucose (G; 10%; 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 g/kg IP every 2 hrs over a 6 hour period), alone and in combination (MB plus G), as a treatment for ackee apple poisoning was evaluated in mice (144 mice; 6 groups of 24 mice). The main outcomes of the study were early mortality (until day 3) and late mortality (day 14) (Barennes et al, 2004). a) Methylene blue showed a trend towards efficacy on early mortality (P=0.07) but not on late mortality. For early survival, MB 8 mg/kg was the most effective with no deaths by day 3. When methylene blue was administered 6 hours or later after poisoning, the treatment was ineffective. Glucose was more effective than MB and had the same survival as MB in conditions of early treatment. Overall, more mice survived in G and G plus MB groups than in MB group (75% and 25%, respectively). Survival in the G plus MB group was the same as survival in the G only group. Hepatitis or hepatic cirrhosis did not occur in animals from any groups. If used, MB should be administered in multiple doses and the first administration should be performed early, at least within 3 hours of intoxication; however in this study it did not provide any additional benefit over treatment with glucose alone (Barennes et al, 2004).
F) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME 1) Renal failure has been reported in some cases and may require hemodialysis.
|