MOBILE VIEW  | 

PHENOL AND RELATED AGENTS

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Phenol is a commonly used preservative in injectable medications and exhibits antimicrobial activity.

Specific Substances

    A) PHENOL SYNONYMS
    1) A13-01814
    2) Acide carbolique (French)
    3) Baker's P and S liquid
    4) Baker's P and S ointment
    5) Benzenol
    6) Carbolic acid
    7) Carbolic oil
    8) Carbolsaure (German)
    9) Fenol (Dutch, Polish)
    10) Fenolo (Italian)
    11) Fenosmolin
    12) Fenosmoline
    13) Hydroxybenzene
    14) Liquefied phenol
    15) Liquid phenol
    16) Monohydroxybenzene
    17) Monophenol
    18) Oxybenzene
    19) Phenic acid
    20) Phenol
    21) Phenol alcohol
    22) Phenol homopolymer
    23) Phenol isotopes
    24) Phenole (German)
    25) Phenolum
    26) Phenosmolin
    27) Phenyl alcohol
    28) Phenyl hydrate
    29) Phenyl hydroxide
    30) Phenylic acid
    31) Phenylic alcohol
    32) PnOH
    33) CAS 108-95-2
    34) NCI-c 50124
    PHENOL DERIVATIVES
    1) Catechol (benzene-1,2-diol)
    2) Chorinated phenols
    3) CREOSOTE, COAL TAR
    4) CRESOL(O-, M-, AND P-)
    5) CRESOL, META-
    6) Cresolic acid (cresol synonym)
    7) CRS (cresol synonym)
    8) Hexachlorophene
    9) Hydroquinone (ie, benzene-1,4-diol)
    10) JUNIPERUS OXYCEDRUSPrickly juniperCade oil
    11) Guaiacol (ie, 2-methoxyphenol)
    12) m-cresol (ie, 3-methylphenol)
    13) p-chloro-m-xylenol
    14) Paraphenol (ie, 4-phenylphenol)
    15) Phenylphenol
    16) Phlorglucinol (ie, 1,3-5-trihydroxybenzene)
    17) Pyrocatechol (ie, benzene-1,2-diol)
    18) Pyrogallol (ie, 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene)
    19) Resorcin (ie, benzene-1,3-diol)
    20) Resorcinol (ie, benzene-1,3-diol)
    21) Sulfurated phenols
    22) Xylenol (ie, dimethylphenol(s))

    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C6-H6-O

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Phenol is available as technical products in fused (82%), crystal (90%), or liquid (95%) form (Lewis, 1997). Sittig (1991) reported phenol's commercial availability as pure crystals or as an aqueous (88%) preparation.
    B) SOURCES
    1) Phenol can be obtained from the distillation of coal tar, or it can be prepared through the fusion of sodium benzenesulfonate with sodium hydroxide or the by heating monochlorobenzene and aqueous sodium hydroxide under high pressure conditions (Budavari, 1996; Lewis, 1998). The majority of the phenol in the US is produced by the oxidation of cumene, which yields acetone as a by-product" (Lewis, 1997).
    2) JUNIPERUS OXYCEDRUS (Koruk et al, 2005; Barrero et al, 1991; Bailey & Bailey, 1976):
    a) Family: Cupressaceae
    b) Description: An evergreen tree which is usually about 12 feet tall, but may reach 30 feet in height. Cade oil (Juniper tar) is extracted by distillation from the branches and wood of Juniperus oxycedrus plant. The plant contains ehteric oils, a trierpene (resin cadinene), and phenols (guaiacol and cresol derivatives).
    c) Leaves: Linear, 0.5 to 1 inch long, tapering from the middle. They are about 0.1 inch across, and spiny-pointed.
    d) Cones: Usually reddish-brown, may be purplish. They are about 0.5 inch in diameter. There are usually three seeds. Fruits are yellow to red/brown.
    e) Distribution: Endemic in the Mediterranean region and in Iran and Turkey. It grows in Europe, Asia, and North America.
    f) Toxicity: One source of cade oil (Juniper tar). This oil contains several sequiterpenes which may have phenolic properties. Phenol (carbolic acid) is the chemical substance responsible for the adverse effects of cade oil exposure.
    C) USES
    1) Phenol is used primarily in the manufacture of phenolic resins, bisphenol A, caprolactam, alkyl phenols, and other chemicals and drugs. It is also used as a dye and indicator, a medical and veterinary antiseptic, a disinfectant (in solution or mixed with slaked lime), a reagent in chemical analysis, and a preservative for pharmaceuticals (ACGIH, 1991; Budavari, 1996; Sittig, 1991; OHM/TADS , 1999).
    2) Phenol is used in the production or manufacture of explosives, fertilizer, coke, illuminating gas, lampblack, paints, paint removers, rubber, asbestos goods, wood preservatives, synthetic resins, textiles, drugs, pharmaceutical preparations, perfumes, bakelite, and other plastics (Sittig, 1991).
    a) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE - numerous workers may be exposed during the production of various products. Occupational dermatitis has been reported in shoemakers exposed to p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (Mancuso et al, 1996).
    3) Phenol is still used in preparations for treatment of localized skin disorders (Castellani's paint), and as a local anesthetic. Dilute phenol solutions have also been injected for celiac plexus nerve block (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    4) JUNIPERUS OXYCEDRUS - Cade oil (Juniper tar) is extracted by distillation from the branches and wood of Juniperus oxycedrus plant. The extract has been reported to have keratolytic, antipruritic, and antimicrobial activities in vitro. It has been used in folk medicine (Koruk et al, 2005).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Phenol (also known as carbolic acid and phenic acid) is used in the treatment of localized skin disorders and as a local anesthetic. Dilute phenol solutions have been injected for celiac plexus nerve blocks. It is also used extensively in the manufacture of many other chemicals and drugs, as a dye and indicator, antiseptic, disinfectant, a reagent in chemical analysis, and a preservative for pharmaceuticals.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: A phenol achieves its affect via several mechanisms.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In concentrations of 5% or greater, it rapidly denatures all proteins it contacts. Some phenols, notably dinitrophenol or hydroquinone, will cause methemoglobinemia. There is also some thought that it may cause increased acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction causing CNS stimulatory effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Calls to poison centers concerning phenol are relatively rare, but many workers in various industries may be exposed to low levels of phenol. Severe manifestations and deaths are very rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Exposure causes irritation to the affected tissue (eg, skin, mucous membranes) and discoloration.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Phenol toxicity occurs most frequently after acute ingestion or chronic dermal application. However, systemic toxicity can also result from inhalation of vapors.
    3) DERMAL: The major hazard of phenol is its ability to penetrate the skin rapidly, especially in its liquid form. Its strong corrosive effect on body tissue can cause severe chemical burns. However, due to its local anesthetizing properties, skin burns may be painless. Skin absorption can cause systemic symptoms and even death. Chronic exposure may lead to symptoms described for acute poisoning as well as eye and skin discoloration.
    4) INGESTION: Phenol ingestion may cause oral, esophageal, and gastric burns. Systemic symptoms of toxicity include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, tachypnea, pallor, profuse sweating, hypotension, dysrhythmias, acute lung injury, methemoglobinemia, hemolytic anemia, elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis, agitation, lethargy, seizures and coma.
    5) PULMONARY: Inhalational exposures can cause digestive disturbances (vomiting, dysphagia, diarrhea, anorexia) and can irritate and even burn the respiratory tract. Signs and symptoms of chronic inhalation exposure may include headache, cough, weakness, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, nervousness, weight loss, paresthesias, ochronosis, and albuminuria.
    6) OCULAR: Direct contact to the eyes may result in symptoms ranging from redness, pain, and blurred vision to severe burns that may lead to partial or even complete loss of vision.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia, and respiratory failure. Approximately 24 hours after delivery, the newborn was pronounced dead. Following supportive therapy, the mother was discharged home on day 15.
    B) Fetotoxicity and skeletal abnormalities have been reported in animal experiments.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Although one study found a high risk of lung cancer among woodworkers exposed to phenol, subsequent studies have not demonstrated an increased risk of cancer. There is, however, a report of squamous cell cancer in situ related to creosote exposure.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Depending on the exposure, different laboratory studies are recommended. For patients with systemic or moderate to severe symptoms, obtain a complete blood count, electrolytes, urinalysis, and baseline renal function and liver enzyme measurements.
    B) Monitor methemoglobin concentration in patients with cyanosis or symptoms.
    C) In addition, careful monitoring of the patient's acid-base balance and continuous cardiac monitoring may be necessary.
    D) Chest radiographs are recommended in patients with inhalational exposure or respiratory symptoms.
    E) Phenol levels are not readily available or useful in exposed patients.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) For mild to moderate toxicity, the mainstay of treatment is decontamination and supportive care. Rinse the mouth, and dilute with small amounts (up to 4 ounces for a child and 8 ounces for an adult) of water if the patient can tolerate it. Treat respiratory irritation with oxygen, administer inhaled beta agonists if bronchospasm develops.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) For patients with severe toxicity, the mainstay of treatment continues to be decontamination and good supportive care. Endoscopy should be performed, ideally within 12 hours, after a significant ingestion to evaluate for GI burns. Treat seizures with benzodiazepines, add barbiturates or propofol if seizures persist. Treat symptomatic methemoglobinemia with methylene blue. Treat dysrhythmias with standard ACLS antidysrhythmics. DERMAL: For dermal burns apply antibiotic ointment, cover with a sterile dressing and for severe extensive burns consult a burn surgeon. INHALATION: Administer oxygen, inhaled beta agonists for bronchospasm. Early airway management if there is evidence of upper airway burns or swelling or severe respiratory distress. OCULAR: After irrigation evaluate visual acuity and perform a slit lamp exam. Consult an ophthalmologist if ocular burns are present, antibiotics and mydriatics may be indicated along with close follow-up. PARENTERAL: Supportive care for symptoms. There is one case report for the use of charcoal hemoperfusion improving clinical status and decreased total and free phenol injections in an adult.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Rinse the mouth, and dilute with small amounts (up to 4 ounces for a child and 8 ounces for an adult) of water if the patient is awake and alert.
    2) HOSPITAL: Rinse the mouth, and dilute with small amounts (up to 4 ounces for a child and 8 ounces for an adult) of water if the patient is awake and alert. For large recent ingestions, consider inserting a small flexible nasogastric tube and aspirating stomach contents. The risk of traumatic injury should be weighed against the potential benefit.
    a) INHALATION: Remove patient to fresh air, and support patient with supplementary oxygen and ventilation as needed.
    b) DERMAL: Immediately flush skin with large amounts of water and remove contaminated clothing as soon as possible.
    c) OCULAR: Immediately flush eye(s) with water for at least 15 minutes.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with severe respiratory symptoms, upper airway injury, or critically ill with CNS depression or seizures may require early intubation.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) There is no specific antidote for phenol exposures. Although some MSDS information will mention a phenol antidote kit with castor oil or other vegetable oils or polyethylene glycol, there is no evidence that use of such kits are effective.
    F) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    1) Initiate oxygen therapy. Treat with methylene blue if patient is symptomatic (usually at methemoglobin concentrations greater than 20% to 30% or at lower concentrations in patients with anemia, underlying pulmonary or cardiovascular disease). METHYLENE BLUE: INITIAL DOSE/ADULT OR CHILD: 1 mg/kg IV over 5 to 30 minutes; a repeat dose of up to 1 mg/kg may be given 1 hour after the first dose if methemoglobin levels remain greater than 30% or if signs and symptoms persist. NOTE: Methylene blue is available as follows: 50 mg/10 mL (5 mg/mL or 0.5% solution) single-dose ampules and 10 mg/1 mL (1% solution) vials. Additional doses may sometimes be required. Improvement is usually noted shortly after administration if diagnosis is correct. Consider other diagnoses or treatment options if no improvement has been observed after several doses. If intravenous access cannot be established, methylene blue may also be given by intraosseous infusion. Methylene blue should not be given by subcutaneous or intrathecal injection. NEONATES: DOSE: 0.3 to 1 mg/kg.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) There is one case report of the use of charcoal hemoperfusion for a phenol overdose from accidental IV injection.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Patients who are asymptomatic or with minimal symptoms after inadvertent exposure to low concentration products and are otherwise improving may be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions, eye exposure, or symptoms should be sent to a health care facility for observation until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with worsening symptoms or severe systemic symptoms should be admitted to the hospital for further evaluation. Patients with severe grade II or grade III GI burns on endoscopy, seizures, mental status changes, dysrhythmias, or severe respiratory distress require ICU admission. Patients should remain admitted until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any patient with systemic symptoms, severe exposure, or in whom the diagnosis is unclear. Consult a gastroenterologist to perform endoscopy in any patient drooling, stridor, persistent vomiting or dysphagia or a significant ingestion. Patients with severe or extensive dermal burns should be evaluated by a burn specialist. Patients with eye burns should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) There is no evidence for the use of phenol antidote kits. The mainstay of initial treatment should be decontamination and/or removal from phenol exposure. Patients with GI burns on endoscopy are at risk for stricture formation and should be followed up in 2 to 3 weeks for barium swallow or repeat endoscopy.
    J) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Phenol vapor is rapidly absorbed after ingestion, dermal exposure, and inhalation. Peak plasma levels in patients receiving lumbar or thoracic sympathetic blocks with unconjugated and conjugated phenols occurred roughly at 20 minutes and 1 hour, respectively. Elimination half-life in the cases of these blocks was approximately 30 minutes for unconjugated phenols and 1 hour for conjugated phenols. Dermal exposures to the skin has a peak blood phenol concentration in 1 hour. Phenol is mostly metabolically converted into water-soluble sulfates and glucuronides, small amounts are excreted unchanged. Excretion is primarily renal.
    K) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) In once case of dermal exposure, an adult male with a 90% phenol exposure had an elimination half-life of approximately 14 hours.
    L) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) The differential diagnosis to phenol exposures includes other caustics that can cause respiratory irritation or topical burns or other caustics that can cause respiratory irritation or topical burns or other drug substances that can cause methemoglobinemia.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) Remove phenol with undiluted polyethylene glycol 300 to 400 or isopropyl alcohol prior to washing, if readily available. Wash exposed areas twice or for at least 10 minutes with large quantities of SOAPY water. Water alone may be harmful. A physician may need to examine the exposed area if irritation or pain persist after the area is washed.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXIC DOSE: ADULT: Acute ingestion of as little as 1 g of phenol in adults has resulted in death, but toxicity has been noted at significantly lower doses. The minimum toxic dose of phenol and related compounds is not well established in the literature, which consists mostly of case reports. PEDIATRIC: Reportedly, ingestions of 50 to 500 mg in infants have been lethal.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: A typical oral dose in lozenges for oral use is 32.5 mg phenol per lozenge every 2 hours as needed. In adults, 0.6 to 1.3 g phenol daily has been used therapeutically. PEDIATRIC: In children over the age of 3, phenol lozenges containing 10 to 500 mg may be given every 2 hours. Chloraseptic liquids and sprays have also been used in children and adults.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Phenol (also known as carbolic acid and phenic acid) is used in the treatment of localized skin disorders and as a local anesthetic. Dilute phenol solutions have been injected for celiac plexus nerve blocks. It is also used extensively in the manufacture of many other chemicals and drugs, as a dye and indicator, antiseptic, disinfectant, a reagent in chemical analysis, and a preservative for pharmaceuticals.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: A phenol achieves its affect via several mechanisms.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In concentrations of 5% or greater, it rapidly denatures all proteins it contacts. Some phenols, notably dinitrophenol or hydroquinone, will cause methemoglobinemia. There is also some thought that it may cause increased acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction causing CNS stimulatory effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Calls to poison centers concerning phenol are relatively rare, but many workers in various industries may be exposed to low levels of phenol. Severe manifestations and deaths are very rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Exposure causes irritation to the affected tissue (eg, skin, mucous membranes) and discoloration.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Phenol toxicity occurs most frequently after acute ingestion or chronic dermal application. However, systemic toxicity can also result from inhalation of vapors.
    3) DERMAL: The major hazard of phenol is its ability to penetrate the skin rapidly, especially in its liquid form. Its strong corrosive effect on body tissue can cause severe chemical burns. However, due to its local anesthetizing properties, skin burns may be painless. Skin absorption can cause systemic symptoms and even death. Chronic exposure may lead to symptoms described for acute poisoning as well as eye and skin discoloration.
    4) INGESTION: Phenol ingestion may cause oral, esophageal, and gastric burns. Systemic symptoms of toxicity include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, tachypnea, pallor, profuse sweating, hypotension, dysrhythmias, acute lung injury, methemoglobinemia, hemolytic anemia, elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis, agitation, lethargy, seizures and coma.
    5) PULMONARY: Inhalational exposures can cause digestive disturbances (vomiting, dysphagia, diarrhea, anorexia) and can irritate and even burn the respiratory tract. Signs and symptoms of chronic inhalation exposure may include headache, cough, weakness, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, nervousness, weight loss, paresthesias, ochronosis, and albuminuria.
    6) OCULAR: Direct contact to the eyes may result in symptoms ranging from redness, pain, and blurred vision to severe burns that may lead to partial or even complete loss of vision.

Vital Signs

    3.3.2) RESPIRATIONS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachypnea may develop in patients with pulmonary irritation or acute lung injury (Pohanish, 2002).
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HYPOTHERMIA: It may occur as a systemic effect of phenol (Goldfrank et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old pregnant woman developed hypothermia (35.2 degrees C) following unintentional ingestion of 50 g of resorcinol. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15. However, her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery (Duran et al, 2004).
    3) CASE REPORT: Within one hour of ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol, a 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed fever (39 degrees C) and hypotension (BP 70/40 mmHg). After admission to the intensive care unit, his systolic blood pressure dropped to 40 mmHg despite intravenous fluid administration. He later developed hypothermia (35 degrees C). Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HYPOTENSION: It may develop with severe poisoning (Bulut et al, 2006; Christiansen & Klaman, 1996; Pohanish, 2002).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) TACHYCARDIA: It may develop with severe poisoning (Bulut et al, 2006; Christiansen & Klaman, 1996; Pohanish, 2002).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) SUMMARY: Phenol is extremely irritating to eyes (Budavari, 1996). Severe corneal injury, iritis, and blindness may occur (Grant, 1993).
    B) IRRITATION: Phenol causes irritation (Budavari, 1996), with tearing, conjunctivitis, and corneal and conjunctival edema (NFPA, 1997; Grant, 1993).
    C) CORNEAL BURNS: Phenol is extremely corrosive to eyes. Injury may include conjunctivitis, superficial punctate keratitis, corneal epithelium defect (Lin et al, 2006), white and hypoesthetic corneas (Grant, 1993), or corneal necrosis (ITI, 1995).
    1) CHEMICAL EPITHELIAL KERATITIS/CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old diabetic woman developed photophobia, pain, and 20% corneal denudation following ocular instillation of a phenol-containing insect repellent (Blanchard, 1989).
    D) BLINDNESS - Partial or total loss of vision may occur (Grant, 1993; Hathaway et al, 1996).
    E) OCHRONOSIS
    1) Chronic systemic absorption has caused gray coloration of the sclera with brown spots near the insertion of rectus muscle tendons (Grant, 1993).
    F) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) GLAUCOMA
    a) Phenol and cresol have been found to induce glaucoma when injected into the eyes of rabbits and monkeys (Grant, 1993)
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) SUMMARY: Phenol produces irritation and burning of the nose and throat, a phenol odor on the breath and white necrotic lesions in the mouth (Budavari, 1996).
    B) SORE THROAT: Persistent sore throat associated with excessive use of phenol-containing throat sprays and lozenges has been reported (Halwell, 1989).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension that progressed to cardiovascular shock developed within one hour of injection of 30 mL of 89% phenol (26.9 g or 0.44 mg/kg of body weight) in a woman being treated for chronic pancreatitis pain (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Hypotension, acute lung injury, and oliguria occurred after she was transferred to an intensive care unit. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion (Bulut et al, 2006).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed hypotension (BP 70/40 mmHg) and tachycardia (85/min) after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. After admission to the intensive care unit, his systolic blood pressure dropped to 40 mmHg despite intravenous fluid administration. Although he didn't experience chest pain, an ECG revealed sinus tachycardia with ST segment elevation in leads I, II, aVF, and V4, V5, V6 and ST segment depression in leads V1 and V2. In addition, elevated cardiac enzymes (CK 1,920 International Units/L, CK-MB 304 International Units/L, Troponin I 17.47 ng/mL) were observed. Echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 66%. Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    B) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Truppman and Ellenby (1979) reported dysrhythmias in 10 of 43 patients undergoing phenol chemical face peels. Dysrhythmias included premature ventricular contraction (4), bigeminy (2), paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (2), and ventricular tachycardia (2) (Truppman & Ellenby, 1979).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old woman developed hypotension and ventricular dysrhythmias following unintentional ingestion of 1 ounce of 89% phenol (Haddad et al, 1979).
    c) CASE REPORT: Ventricular tachycardia developed 62 min after injection of 30 mL of a 89% phenol solution which contained approximately 26.9 g of phenol for a dose of 0.44 mg/kg of body weight (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    d) Atrial fibrillation and other dysrhythmias have occurred with chemical face peeling with phenol solutions (Gross, 1983) (Stuzin et al, 1983). Some patients had preexisting cardiac disease.
    e) CASE REPORT: After undergoing mechanical dermabrasion and chemical peeling with phenol, an 11-year-old boy with xeroderma pigmentosum developed ventricular tachycardia with a pulse rate of up to 220 beats per minute. One day after the surgery, the urinary phenol concentration was 58.9 mg/dL (ref range 0-20.7 mg/dL). He recovered completely and was discharged home 7 days after surgery without further sequelae (Unlu et al, 2004).
    f) Spontaneously-resolving premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) occurred during subtrigonal phenol injection therapy for severe urinary incontinence (Forrest & Ramage, 1987).
    3.5.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CARDIOMYOPATHY
    a) RATS: A study using laboratory rats, in which phenol was applied to the skin, found direct myocardial toxicity (decreased blood pressure and heart rate, S-T segment depression, and T-wave inversion). Death resulted from pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (Stagnone et al, 1987).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC EFFECT OF GAS, FUMES AND/OR VAPORS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Because of its low volatility, phenol is not considered a serious respiratory risk through inhalation exposure (ACGIH, 2001; Hathaway et al, 1996). However, it can cause cardiorespiratory collapse through its systemic effects in acute poisoning (Raffle et al, 1994).
    B) HYPERVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachypnea occurs after exposure (Pohanish, 2002).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed tachypnea (a respiratory rate of 22 beats/minute) and productive cough after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    C) BRONCHOSPASM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Following intercostal nerve block with phenol, a 51-year-old man developed a burning sensation in the pharynx, tachypnea, and bilateral inspiratory and expiratory wheezing and rhonchi, which was relieved by inhaled albuterol (Atkinson & Shupak, 1989).
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Adult respiratory distress syndrome and fatal respiratory failure have been reported following phenol poisoning (inhalation or ingestion) (Gupta et al, 2008; Dart et al, 2000; Fu et al, 2001).
    b) Acute overexposure can result in noisy, difficult breathing, cough, rales, acute lung injury, and death due to respiratory failure (Budavari, 1996; ITI, 1995).
    c) CASE REPORT: Marked hyperemia of the tracheal and bronchial mucous membranes and acute lung injury was seen on autopsy following an ingestion of 10-20g of phenol in a woman attempting suicide. She initially became comatose with partial absence of reflexes, skin pallor, increased respirations, weak and rapid pulse and nonreactive pupils. These symptoms progressed to cardiac and respiratory arrest and failed attempts to resuscitate (HSDB, 2003).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with chronic pain was inadvertently injected with 10 cc of 89% phenol (intended dose: 10 cc of 6% phenol) and developed immediate shortness of breath followed by hypoxia (ABG: pH 7.31; pCO2 14 mmHg; pO2 38 mmHg) requiring mechanical ventilation. Chest x-ray showed alveolar and interstitial opacities by day 2 of admission. Ventilatory support was continued for 4 days, with the patient successfully extubated. Clinical findings improved, but the patient continued to have persistent opacities on chest x-ray and multiple bilateral nodular opacities were observed on chest CT. At 6 months, lung nodules had resolved (Gupta et al, 2008).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman drank 600 mL of a chemical antiseptic which contained 15% ortho-phenylphenol in a suicide attempt. She developed progressive dyspnea and coma. On admission her pulse rate was 108 beats/minute and respiratory rate 34/minute. Chest x-ray showed increased alveolar infiltrates in bilateral upper lobes, especially the right upper lobe.
    1) On the 4th hospital day, her hepatic and renal function deteriorated with an alanine aminotransferase of 673 Units/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 187 Units/L, BUN of 92 mg/L, and creatinine of 5.5 mg/L. On the 7th day, chest x-ray showed progression of alveolar infiltrates and poor oxygenation. Open lung biopsy on the 16th day showed diffuse alveolar damage compatible with acute respiratory distress syndrome. She was treated with supportive measures and her general condition gradually improved. Chest x-ray on the 29th day showed diffuse fibrosis a pneumothorax. She was discharged on the 34th day with continuing oxygen therapy (Chen et al, 2005).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Hypotension, acute lung injury, and oliguria occurred after she was transferred to an intensive care unit. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion. Autopsy results revealed acute lung injury, renal congestion, an eosinophilic substance in renal cortical tubular lumens, and hyperemia in all organs (Bulut et al, 2006).
    g) CASE REPORT: Mild interstitial pulmonary edema in the left lung occurred in a 48-year-old man after experiencing dermal second-degree burns following contact with 15% phenol. His condition improved 3 days after intensive pulmonary care (Lin et al, 2006).
    E) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after inadvertent ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion. Autopsy results revealed diffuse pulmonary edema, renal congestion, an eosinophilic substance in renal cortical tubular lumens, and hyperemia in all organs (Bulut et al, 2006).
    b) Respiratory arrest occurred 30 minutes after ingestion of 26.7 g of phenol (Haddad et al, 1979).
    c) CASE REPORT: Respiratory distress that resulted in intubation occurred approximately 30 minutes after injection of 30 mL of 89% phenol (26.9 g or 0.44 g/kg of body weight) in an adult (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    d) Respiratory failure may develop secondary to upper airway injury and/or CNS depression (Kamijo et al, 1999; Wu et al, 1998).
    F) EPIGLOTTITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Acute epiglottitis resulting in life-threatening airway obstruction developed in a 49-year-old woman following use of a phenol-containing throat spray (Ho & Hollinrake, 1989).
    G) STRIDOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Upper airway injury may result in stridor, as reported in 5% (4/72) of patients after ingestion of 26% phenol in a 5-year retrospective study (Spiller et al, 1993).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Phenol exposure results in headaches, dizziness, weakness, tremor, convulsions, unconsciousness, central nervous system depression and coma (ITI, 1995; Budavari, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed headache after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol (Koruk et al, 2005).
    B) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Seizures and death were reported following dermal exposure of less than 10% of the body surface area to a pure solution of 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL in a 33-year-old man (Kintz et al, 1992).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old woman developed seizures following unintentional ingestion of 1 ounce of 89% phenol (Haddad et al, 1979).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old boy developed recurrent seizures 8 hours after sustaining dermal burns from cresol. Seizures recurred 4 days after exposure, but were controlled with benzodiazepines and valproate (Sakai et al, 1999).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion (Bulut et al, 2006).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old pregnant woman developed unconsciousness, drowsiness and tonic-clonic seizures following unintentional ingestion of 50 g of resorcinol. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15. However, her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery (Duran et al, 2004).
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Initially fleeting excitation may occur, but is quickly followed by seizures and unconsciousness (Kamijo et al, 1999; Sakai et al, 1999; Wu et al, 1998).
    b) Spiller et al (1993) reported that 11% (9/72) of patients with acute oral exposures to a 26% phenol containing disinfectant experienced lethargy, while 2 developed coma. Onset of lethargy ranged from 15 minutes to 1 hour (Spiller et al, 1993).
    c) CASE REPORT: An adult became comatose 4 hours after unintentional injection of 26.9 g of phenol (0.44 mg/kg of body weight) during therapy for chronic pain (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    D) PARALYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FACIAL PALSIES/CASE REPORT: Repeated attacks of left-sided facial palsies occurred in a 42-year-old woman within minutes after exposure to increased air concentrations of chlorocresol (Dossing et al, 1986).
    E) EXTRAPYRAMIDAL SIGN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Extrapyramidal symptoms described as "neuroleptic-induced rabbit syndrome" were reported in a 65-year-old woman who ingested 70 mL of 42 to 52% phenol approximately 3 hours after presenting in a comatose state with flaccid extremities. It's suggested that phenol increased acetylcholine release with corresponding dopaminergic hypofunction, which resulted in perioral movements which were fine, rapid and rhythmic, along with Parkinsonian symptoms. No permanent sequelae were reported (Kamijo et al, 1999).
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) NEUROPATHY
    a) Phenol has been shown to be neurotoxic in animal studies. Mice exposed to varying phenol concentrations in drinking water were shown to have lower concentrations of neurotransmitters, including norepinephrine, dopamine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (Hsieh et al, 1992).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ULCER OF ESOPHAGUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ESOPHAGEAL BURNS: Ingestion of lethal amounts of produces severe burns of the mouth, pharynx, esophagus and gastrointestinal tract; perforation is possible (Hathaway et al, 1996; ITI, 1995). In one patient, endoscopy revealed diffuse esophageal ulcers compatible with grade IIb corrosive injury (Chen et al, 2005).
    b) FINDINGS: White, necrotic lesions form in the mouth, esophagus and stomach (Budavari, 1996).
    c) Of 17 patients who underwent endoscopy after ingesting a 26% phenol solution, 16 had first-degree burns and one had minor tissue sloughing (Spiller et al, 1993).
    B) DRUG-INDUCED GASTROINTESTINAL DISTURBANCE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, severe abdominal pain and difficulty swallowing result from exposure (Hathaway et al, 1996; Budavari, 1996; ITI, 1995)
    b) Chlorinated drinking water contaminated with phenols resulted in the production of phenol, monochlorophenols, dichlorophenols, and trichlorophenols which were associated with a significant increase in gastrointestinal illness in the exposed population (Jarvis et al, 1985).
    c) Gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, mouth sores, burning of the mouth and dark urine were the primary symptoms that appeared after consuming drinking water contaminated with phenol. On a 6 month follow-up, no residual health effects were found in the individuals who consumed the contaminated water (Baxter et al, 2000).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed nausea and vomiting after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. Examination of his mouth showed several gingival erosions. Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 65-year-old woman developed erosive duodenogastritis after ingesting 70 mL of 42% to 52% phenol (Kamijo et al, 1999).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INJURY OF LIVER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Liver damage can occur after phenol exposure (Hathaway et al, 1996), which can result in jaundice (ITI, 1995) and death (Lewis, 2000).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man presented to the hospital with jaundice, mild right upper quadrant tenderness, hematuria, and backache 6 days after phenol injection (2 mL of 5% phenol) sclerotherapy for hemorrhoids. The laboratory results revealed elevated serum urea 25.7 mmol/L (normal 2.8-7.6), serum creatinine 171 mcmol/L (normal 70-133), bilirubin 110 mcmol/L (normal 3-17), alkaline phosphatase 301 International Units/L (normal 45-122), and alanine aminotransferase 64 Units/L (normal 10-44). In addition, his INR was 1.1, serum albumin was low at 31 g/L (normal 38-47), and C-reactive protein was elevated at 264 (normal less than 6). He was diagnosed with hepatotoxicity with associated transient renal failure. After supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home a week later. However, he still had abnormal liver function tests for the next 6 months (Suppiah & Perry, 2005).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed hepatotoxicity after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. Laboratory results showed mildly elevated liver enzymes (ALT 49 International Units/L, AST 66 International Units/L, LDH 329 International Units/L) which returned to normal concentrations on the fourth day postingestion (Koruk et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman drank 600 mL of a chemical antiseptic which contained 15% ortho-phenylphenol in a suicide attempt. She developed progressive dyspnea and coma. On admission her pulse rate was 108 beats/minute and respiratory rate 34/minute with intermittent tachypnea. Chest x-ray showed increased alveolar infiltrates in bilateral upper lobes, especially the right upper lobe.
    1) On the 4th hospital day, her hepatic and renal function deteriorated with an alanine aminotransferase of 673 Units/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 187 Units/L, BUN of 92 mg/L, and creatinine of 5.5 mg/L. She was treated with supportive measures and her general condition gradually improved including liver and renal function. Chest x-ray on the 29th day showed diffuse fibrosis and a pneumothorax. She was discharged on the 34th day with continuing oxygen therapy (Chen et al, 2005).
    B) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Following contact with 15% to 99% phenol, four men suffered dermal burns on 7% to 10% of their total body surface areas. In the first 3 to 5 post-burn days, an elevation of liver enzymes (AST and ALT) was observed (Lin et al, 2006).
    b) CASE REPORT: Marked elevations in aminotransferase concentrations (AST 10,450 International Units/L, ALT 8,990 International Units/L, LDH 15,580 International Units/L, and CPK 170 International Units/L) were reported in an initially asymptomatic 26-year-old female 24 hours after intentional ingestion of approximately 70 mL of a 50% cresol solution (Hashimoto et al, 1998). Hepatic enzyme concentrations had returned to baseline within 3 months of exposure.
    c) CASE REPORT: After undergoing mechanical dermabrasion and chemical peeling with phenol, an 11-year-old boy with xeroderma pigmentosum developed ventricular tachycardia with a pulse rate of up to 220 beats per minute. In addition, elevated liver enzymes (AST, 62 Units/L; ALT, 23 Units/L; LDH, 744 Units/L) were observed. He recovered completely and was discharged home 7 days after surgery without further sequelae (Unlu et al, 2004).
    C) HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Fatal neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has been reported following inhalation of phenolic vapors in poorly ventilated nurseries in which phenol has been used to disinfect bassinets and mattresses (HSDB, 2003).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis, high bilirubin concentrations (direct-reacting bilirubin, 4.5; total bilirubin, 8 as highest concentrations), severe metabolic acidosis, and green-colored urine. Her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).
    3.9.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Abnormal Liver Function
    a) F344 rats given mixtures of low concentrations of phenol along with arsenic, benzene, chloroform, chromium, lead and trichloroethylene, showed hepatic proliferation after treatments up to 1 month (Constan et al, 1995).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Phenol exposure can produce kidney damage, with oliguria or anuria as well as albumin, casts, and red and white blood cells in urine (ITI, 1995).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with chronic pain was inadvertently injected with 10 cc phenol 89% (intended dose: 10 cc of 6% phenol) and developed oliguria on day 2 of admission. Hemodialysis was started for phenol clearance, but serum creatinine increased to 8.0 mg/dL by day 8. The patient was continued on intermittent hemodialysis (a dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min and blood flow rate of 35 mL/min). Hemodialysis was discontinued on day 12. Gradually, myoglobinuria and proteinuria slowly improved and resolved by day 14. After acute symptoms resolved, the patient developed polyuria for several months. Renal function returned to normal within 6 months (Gupta et al, 2008).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Hypotension, acute lung injury and oliguria occurred after she was transferred to an intensive care unit. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion. Autopsy results revealed diffuse acute lung injury, renal congestion, an eosinophilic substance in renal cortical tubular lumens, and hyperemia in all organs (Bulut et al, 2006).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman drank 600 mL of a chemical antiseptic which contained 15% ortho-phenylphenol in a suicide attempt. She developed progressive dyspnea and coma. On admission her pulse rate was 108 beats/minute and respiratory rate 34/minute with intermittent tachypnea. Chest x-ray showed increased alveolar infiltrates in bilateral upper lobes, especially the right upper lobe.
    1) On the 4th hospital day, her hepatic and renal function deteriorated with an alanine aminotransferase of 673 Units/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 187 Units/L, BUN of 92 mg/L, and creatinine of 5.5 mg/L. She was treated with supportive measures and her general condition gradually improved including liver and renal function. She was discharged on the 34th day with continuing oxygen therapy (Chen et al, 2005).
    e) CASE REPORT: After falling into a vat of solvent containing 40% phenol in dichloromethane, a 41-year-old man developed acute renal failure, with renal cortical necrosis followed by renal papillary damage. He sustained renal injury and surface burns even though he avoided ingestion and was decontaminated rapidly (Foxall et al, 1989).
    f) CASE REPORT: Acute renal failure (BUN 40 mg/dL, peak creatinine 9.8 mg/dL), mild gastrointestinal corrosive injury, and pneumonia occurred following intentional ingestion of 150 grams cresol in a 44-year-old man (Wu et al, 1998). Despite multiple complications, the patient recovered without sequelae following hemodialysis and intensive supportive therapy.
    g) CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man presented to the hospital with jaundice, mild right upper quadrant tenderness, hematuria, and backache 6 days after phenol injection (2 mL of 5% phenol) sclerotherapy for hemorrhoids. The laboratory results revealed elevated serum urea 25.7 mmol/L (normal 2.8-7.6), serum creatinine 171 mcmol/L (normal 70-133), bilirubin 110 mcmol/L (normal 3-17), alkaline phosphatase 301 International Units/L (normal 45-122), and alanine aminotransferase 64 Units/L (normal 10-44). In addition, his INR was 1.1, serum albumin was low at 31 g/L (normal 38-47), and C-reactive protein was elevated at 264 (normal less than 6). He was diagnosed with hepatotoxicity with associated transient renal failure. After supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home a week later. However, he still had abnormal liver function tests for the next 6 months (Suppiah & Perry, 2005).
    h) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed acute renal failure after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. The urine examination revealed gross hematuria, leukocytes 10(5)/mL, proteinuria (1,000 mg/dL), and glucosuria (100 mg/dL). Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    B) ABNORMAL URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The renal insufficiency after phenol exposure can result in bloody urine (Pohanish, 2002). Urine color may be dark green, brown or black (Goldfrank et al, 1998; (Hashimoto et al, 1998; Sakai et al, 1999). Dark urine (bilirubin-negative) has been a prominent feature of occupational exposure to vaporized phenol (Goldfrank et al, 1998).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman presented with dark green urine after ingesting a product containing 50% cresol (Hashimoto et al, 1998).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis, high bilirubin concentrations, severe metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.85; pCO2, 24 mmHg; PO2, 56 mmHg; HCO3, 3 mmol/L; BE, -25 mmol/L), and green-colored urine. Her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old woman developed metabolic acidosis following unintentional ingestion of 1 ounce of 89% phenol. The patient had a mixed acid-base disturbance characterized by respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis throughout the first 24 hours post ingestion. The widest ion gap was 17 mEq/L. The acidosis responded to bicarbonate and potassium replacement (Haddad et al, 1979).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman presented with mild metabolic acidosis (pH 7.38, PaCO2 31 mmHg, HCO3 18 mmol/L) after ingesting a product containing 50% cresol (Hashimoto et al, 1998).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man intentionally ingested 150 grams cresol and developed a mixed metabolic acidosis and respiratory alkalosis along with acute renal failure. The patient recovered following intensive supportive care (Wu et al, 1998).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis (pH 7.021, pCO2 60.5 mm Hg, pO2 45.5 mm Hg, HCO3 15.3 mmol/L, base excess 16.2 mmol/L) after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion (Bulut et al, 2006).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentional ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis, high bilirubin concentrations, severe metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.85; pCO2, 24 mmHg; PO2, 56 mmHg; HCO3, 3 mmol/L; BE, -25 mmol/L), and green-colored urine. Her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Methemoglobinemia may develop after exposure to phenol (ACGIH, 2001).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion. Methemoglobin concentration of 10% was found in the blood sample obtained at the autopsy (Bulut et al, 2006).
    B) DEEP THROMBOPHLEBITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Deep venous thrombosis has developed following injections of diluted phenol solutions (2% to 7%) used to produce either chemical neurolysis or motor point blocks for control of muscle spasticity in handicapped patients (Macek, 1983).
    C) BLOOD COAGULATION DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman developed hepatic injury and coagulopathy (PT 17.3 seconds with a control of 10.8 seconds) after ingesting a product containing 50% cresol (Hashimoto et al, 1998).
    D) HEMOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hemolytic anemia may occur after exposure to phenol (ACGIH, 2001; Duran et al, 2004).
    b) CASE REPORT: Following intentional ingestion of 300 mL of a 50% cresol solution (150 g), a 44-year-old man had multiple organ system complications, which included hemolysis, acute renal failure, and pneumonia (Wu et al, 1998). Complete recovery occurred after intensive supportive therapy.
    E) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed thrombocytopenia (a nadir of 51,000/mm(3) 2 days postingestion) after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. Following supportive care, he recovered and was discharged home without further sequelae (Koruk et al, 2005).
    F) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale reading, 3 points), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, leukocytosis (white blood cells 42,900/mm(3)), and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion (Bulut et al, 2006).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis (25,000/mm(3)), high bilirubin concentrations, severe metabolic acidosis, and green-colored urine. Her newborn was pronounced dead approximately 24 hours after delivery. Following supportive therapy, she was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).
    G) ABNORMAL FINDING ON EVALUATION PROCEDURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE STUDY: A study of 52 male workers and 30 male controls who were occupationally exposed to phenol alone or in combination with other solvents was conducted at an oil refinery in Egypt. Twenty of the males were exposed to phenol alone and 32 were exposed to phenol and other solvents including benzene, toluene and methylethylketone. Workers exposed to phenol alone or with the solvents had significantly elevated serum amino transferases, longer clotting times and lower creatinine concentrations than the control group. Prothrombin times were significantly increased in the phenol and solvent group.
    1) Hemoglobin, hematocrits, basophil and neutrophil counts were all significantly decreased in the phenol plus solvent group. Monocyte counts were significantly decreased in all exposed workers. Platelet and eosinophil counts were decreased in the phenol plus solvent group.
    2) Blood magnesium, manganese and calcium were significantly increased in all exposed workers. Copper and iron concentrations were significantly decreased in the phenol plus solvent group (Shamy et al, 1994).
    3.13.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ANEMIA
    a) MICE - Phenol has been shown to decrease peripheral red blood cell counts and hematocrits in mice given drinking water with varying concentrations of phenol (Hsieh et al, 1992).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN ABSORPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Systemic toxicity and poisoning usually occurs by skin absorption, the main route of entry for solid, liquid or vapor phenol; the result can be lethal (ACGIH, 2001; AAR, 1996).
    B) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Skin irritation and sensitization may occur from using phenol containing products and have been reported during occupational exposure (Mancuso et al, 1996). Contact with the skin for prolonged periods may result in denaturation and gangrene followed by necrosis (Fisher, 1980).
    b) Allergic contact dermatitis may rarely occur following the use of resorcinol in topical agents for the treatment of eczema (Langeland & Braathen, 1987).
    C) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Abnormal pigmentation commonly occurs following dermal contact with phenolic compounds (Saunders et al, 1988; Tanaka et al, 1998). Deposition of dark pigment in the skin can result from prolonged contact with a dilute phenol solution (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: Postmortem exam of a 27-year-old man presumed to have ingested a phenol compound had notably large areas on the skin surface (upper and lower extremities) that were dark brown in color as well as the lips and oral mucous membranes (Tanaka et al, 1998). The walls of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs were also dark brown and inflamed upon examination. Urine that was found in the bladder was reddish yellow in color.
    D) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Concentrated phenol may cause second- and third-degree burns (Lin et al, 2006; Grant, 1993; Fu et al, 2001) because of its caustic and defatting properties (Harbison, 1998). Phenol has local anesthetic properties that may allow extensive damage to occur before pain is recognized. The affected area may become white and opaque or dull gray, followed by a grey-white sloughing, then necrosis; this may lead to black gangrene (Saydjari et al, 1986; Raffle et al, 1994).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) PEDIATRIC
    a) Two children who were splashed on the face, neck, and arms with cresol solutions developed desquamation and partial-thickness burns (Pegg & Campbell, 1985).
    b) A 7-year-old child was found comatose with chemical burns on 15% of his body surface (areas of the buttocks and scrotum) after playing on a park slide that had a puddle in front of it that was contaminated with cresol (Sakai et al, 1999). Total serum cresol concentration 2 hours after exposure was 206.9 mcg/mL.
    c) ADULT
    1) After falling into a vat of solvent containing 40% phenol in dichloromethane, a 41-year-old man suffered chemical burns to 50% of his body surface even though he remained immersed for only seconds and was decontaminated rapidly (Foxall et al, 1989).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed severe cutaneous burns on the face 3 days after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol. He experienced erythema, maculopapular, and some pustular lesions on the nose and perioral area. In addition, his facial skin became red and swollen and white with opaque areas of desquamation, healing over the next 4 days (Koruk et al, 2005).
    E) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Intense diaphoresis may occur soon after exposure (Pohanish, 2002).
    F) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) One case of contact allergy to phenol has been reported as a result of a phenol-formaldehyde resin in a knee guard. Patch tests were negative to formaldehyde, but positive for phenol (Vincenzi et al, 1992).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MUSCLE PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man with nephrolithiasis developed myalgia after ingesting a spoonful of home-made extract of Juniperus oxycedrus containing phenol (Koruk et al, 2005).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FINDING OF THYROID FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ANTITHYROID ACTIVITY: Resorcinol has been reported to be goitrogenic and antithyroid per in vitro and in vivo experimental animal studies (Gaitan et al, 1987) .

Immunologic

    3.19.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) LEUKOPENIA
    a) Phenol has been shown to suppress the stimulation of cultured splenic lymphocytes in studies with mice (Hsieh et al, 1992).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia, and respiratory failure. Approximately 24 hours after delivery, the newborn was pronounced dead. Following supportive therapy, the mother was discharged home on day 15.
    B) Fetotoxicity and skeletal abnormalities have been reported in animal experiments.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) HUMANS
    1) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    a) In one review, phenol was said to affect the human embryo or fetus (Kuntz, 1976). Generally, substances that can induce methemoglobinemia are of particular concern for the fetus. Fetal hemoglobin is oxidized to methemoglobin more readily than the adult form is, and the fetus has a relatively higher demand for oxygen than does the adult.
    2) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) In a Swedish reproductive epidemiological study of occupational exposure to disinfectants that included phenol and other substances, there was no clear association with risk for birth defects (Hernberg, 1983).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) SKELETAL MALFORMATION
    a) In mice, post-implantation mortality, fetal death, fetotoxicity, as well as specific developmental abnormalities of the musculoskeletal and craniofacial system in the offspring were seen (RTECS, 2003).
    b) Treatment of F-344 rats by gavage on days 6 to 19 of gestation caused resorption and kinked-tail malformation, but maternal toxicity was also present (Narotsky & Kavlock, 1995).
    2) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) Phenol has generally not been teratogenic in experimental animals, except at very high doses that were also toxic to the mothers (p 92). When injected in pregnant rats at a dose of 200 mg/kg, it had no effect (Minor & Becker, 1971). When given orally to rats at a dose of 120 mg/kg/day, it increased resorptions and caused low fetal weight, but was not teratogenic (p 120).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) NEONATAL DEATH
    1) CASE REPORT - A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy unintentionally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis (25,000/mm(3)), high bilirubin concentrations (direct-reacting bilirubin, 4.5; total bilirubin, 8 as highest concentrations), severe metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.85; pCO2, 24 mmHg; PO2, 56 mmHg; HCO3, 3 mmol/L; BE, -25 mmol/L), and green-colored urine. The CT scan showed a diffuse edema in brain. Following an urgent cesarean delivery, the newborn was found to be apneic, cyanotic, and bradycardic with Apgar scores of 4-5 at 1 and 5 minutes. At the neonatal ICU, the infant was tachypneic (88/min), hypothermic (35.1 degrees C), hypotensive (40/20 mmHg), with a pulse of 160/min. The infant's blood samples showed hypoxia and metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.95; PO2, 26 mmHg; PCO2, 24 mmHg). Diffuse pulmonary atelectasis and increased opacity of the lung fields were seen in the lung x-ray. Approximately 24 hours after delivery, the newborn was pronounced dead. Following supportive therapy, the mother was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) FETOTOXICITY
    a) In the female rat, fetotoxicity was observed via the intraperitoneal route as well as fetotoxicity and post-implantation mortality by the oral route (RTECS, 2003).
    b) Rats given up to 120 mg/kg of phenol by gavage on days 6 to 15 of gestation showed dose-related signs of fetotoxicity (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    c) Rats exposed to up to 1.3 ppm of phenol throughout pregnancy showed increased pre-implantation loss and early postnatal death in the offspring (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    d) Mice given up to 280 mg/kg of phenol by gavage on days 6 to 15 of gestation showed dose-related signs of fetotoxicity (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    e) Phenol disrupted the estrus cycles in rats inhaling concentrations of 0.5 or 5 mg/m(3) for 3 months (Kolesnikova, 1972) and also caused pre-implantation deaths and early postnatal deaths under the same conditions (pp 149-153).
    2) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) In a study of benzene and benzene metabolites in cultured rat embryos, phenol alone was minimally embryotoxic. However, phenol + S9 microsomal fraction resulted in dysmorphic and embryotoxic effects at a 0.01 M concentration. Generation of hydroquinone and catechol by microsomal oxidation was demonstrated by HPLC (Chapman et al, 1994).
    3) ALTERED SEX RATIO
    a) One study concluded that phenol altered the sex ratio in rats at a concentration of 30 mg/m(3) and also suggested that the same effect could occur in humans (Malysheva, 1976).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) HUMANS
    a) Women and men working with phenol-formaldehyde resins were reported to have urogenital diseases (Ishchenko & Pushkina, 1978). Impotence occurred following acute phenol poisoning in one man (O'Donaghue, 1985), which may have been due to a general CNS effect rather than to a specific effect on the sex organs.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS108-95-2 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Phenol
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 3
    1) The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Although one study found a high risk of lung cancer among woodworkers exposed to phenol, subsequent studies have not demonstrated an increased risk of cancer. There is, however, a report of squamous cell cancer in situ related to creosote exposure.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Although one study found a high risk of lung cancer among Finnish woodworkers exposed to phenol, subsequent studies did not consistently demonstrate an increased risk of cancer (IARC, 1999). A study of 2179 employees at 11 wood-treating plants where workers were exposed to creosote did not find any evidence that employees were at an increased risk of cancer (Wong & Harris, 2005).
    2) NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCERS
    a) An association between occupational exposure of US men to chlorophenol and nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers was observed (Mirabelli et al, 2000). The duration of exposure seemed to be a positive correlation in both types of cancers. The intensity of exposure also seemed to be a risk factor for nasopharyngeal cancer.
    3) SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
    a) A 50-year-old male railroad worker presented with an erythematous, tender skin lesion on the right knee. The lesion had been present and intermittently tender for several years. When it did not resolve, it was biopsied, revealing squamous cell carcinoma in situ. The patient had worked for the railroad for 30 years and was exposed to coal tar creosote-treated railroad ties and lumber almost daily. The ties and timber he carried, handled and kneeled on were heavily coated with creosote and the creosote commonly coated his work clothes at the end of his work shifts (Carlsten et al, 2005).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Phenol was not considered carcinogenic to rats or mice receiving up to 5000 ppm in drinking water for 103 weeks (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    2) Phenol was shown to be a promoter of skin cancer in mice in two-stage protocols (IARC, 1999).
    3) Phenol was determined to be carcinogenic and neoplastic by RTECS criteria; tumorigenic in mouse skin and appendages (RTECS, 2003). Phenol induced tumors on the skin of mice (Bingham et al, 2001) and promoted the carcinogenic effect of other substances (Boutwell & Rosch, 1959); it shown also to be a promoter of skin cancer in mice in two-stage protocols (IARC, 1999).
    4) When given in the drinking water to mice and rats, phenol induced leukemias and lymphomas, but was judged not to be carcinogenic because there was no clear dose response (ANON, 1980); this may be significant given that phenol is a major metabolite of BENZENE, which causes leukemias in humans (See Genetic Effects section below). Phenol was not considered carcinogenic to rats or mice receiving up to 5000 ppm in drinking water for 103 weeks (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    5) Phenol stimulated the carcinogenic effect of benzo(a)pyrene in rats and mice when the two substances were given simultaneously. However, when phenol was given prior to or subsequent to the benzo(a)pyrene, it inhibited carcinogenesis (Yanysheva et al, 1992). The significance of this finding is not clear.

Genotoxicity

    A) Phenol has caused DNA damage, mutations, chromosomal aberrations, unscheduled DNA synthesis, DNA inhibition and micronuclei in experimental animals and cultured cells.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Depending on the exposure, different laboratory studies are recommended. For patients with systemic or moderate to severe symptoms, obtain a complete blood count, electrolytes, urinalysis, and baseline renal function and liver enzyme measurements.
    B) Monitor methemoglobin concentration in patients with cyanosis or symptoms.
    C) In addition, careful monitoring of the patient's acid-base balance and continuous cardiac monitoring may be necessary.
    D) Chest radiographs are recommended in patients with inhalational exposure or respiratory symptoms.
    E) Phenol levels are not readily available or useful in exposed patients.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) "Normal" blood concentrations
    a) Free phenol: 0 to 4 mg/100 mL
    b) Conjugated phenol: 0.1 to 2 mg/100 mL
    c) Total phenol: 0.15 to 7.96 mg/100 mL
    2) Obtain baseline liver and renal measurements. Daily monitoring for hepatocellular injury should be considered even after a 24-hour asymptomatic period.
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor acid-base balance closely.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY CONCENTRATIONS
    1) Phenol urine concentrations should be monitored to determine if they are within normal range (0.5 to 81.5 mg/L). Higher concentrations require workplace surveillance.
    2) Highest concentrations of phenol, p-cresol, o-cresol and 2,5-xylenol were detected in urine 8 to 10 hours after beginning of exposure (Bieniek, 1994).
    3) For occupational exposure, ACGIH recommends that urine be collected at the end of the shift to determine the total phenol in urine. Normal urinary excretion of free and conjugated phenol can vary widely and may be related to diet and certain medications, such as Chloraseptic lozenges or Pepto-Bismol (Bingham et al, 2001).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
    a) A pre-employment examination should be done. Liver function, kidney function, and urinary phenol should be examined and documented. Examinations should be repeated after exposure and compared with pre-employment concentrations (Pohanish, 2002; HSDB, 2003).
    2) PREDISPOSING CONDITIONS
    a) Persons with known hepatic or kidney diseases should not be exposed to phenol for any length of time. Even intermittent exposure to vapors, particularly when handled at elevated temperatures, may become dangerous (HSDB, 2003).

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST X-RAY
    1) Obtain a baseline chest x-ray in patients with respiratory symptoms or hypoxia following a significant inhalation exposure and repeat as indicated. Diffuse interstitial infiltrates, consistent with fibrosing alveolitis have been reported in patients that develop adult respiratory distress syndrome secondary to phenol exposure (Fu et al, 2001).
    B) OTHER
    1) NUCLEAR MEDICINE STUDIES: Fu et al (2001) reported the use of Tc-99m MAA lung scintigraphy and Ga-67 citrate lung scintigraphy to study phenol-induced lung toxicity following unintentional exposure in an adult. Findings from both studies were consistent with adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Methods

    A) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) FERRIC CHLORIDE: The presence of phenols may be non-specifically detected through the use of 10% ferric chloride reagent. However, normal urine may be positive.
    2) Phenols, cresols, and xylenols in workplace can be simultaneously determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, with a polystyrene divinylbenzene resin-based reversed-phase column (Nieminen & Heikkila, 1986).
    3) GC: Gas chromatography can be used to determine cresols in biological cases (Yashiki et al, 1990).
    4) A method has been described to analyze urine for concentrations of phenol, o-cresol, m- and p-cresols, naphthol, catechol, and 2,5-xylenol in the urine of workers exposed simultaneously to phenolic compounds or aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene and naphthalene (Bienek & Whilczok, 1986).
    5) NMP urinalysis was used to monitor disease process in a 41-year-old man who fell into a shallow vat of industrial solvent containing 40 percent phenol in dichloromethane (Foxall et al, 1989).
    B) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Phenol concentrations in the blood, urine, stomach contents, and organs were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in an adult who unintentionally ingested fluid containing phenol (Tanaka et al, 1998).
    2) Fatal concentrations from ingestion of a solution containing phenol and o-cresol were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Stomach content extractions were obtained by gel permeation with cyclohexane/dichloromethane. Urine samples were prepared by solid phase extraction and blood sample extraction utilized deproteinization with acetonitrile. The phenol and o-cresol concentrations found were 115.0 mcg/g and 5.0 mcg/g in the stomach contents, 58.3 mcg/mL and 1.9 mcg/mL in the blood, and 3.3 mcg/mL and 20.5 mcg/mL in the urine, respectively (Boatto et al, 2004).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with worsening symptoms or severe systemic symptoms should be admitted to the hospital for further evaluation. Patients with severe grade II or grade III GI burns on endoscopy, seizures, mental status changes, dysrhythmias, or severe respiratory distress require ICU admission. Patients should remain admitted until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who are asymptomatic or with minimal symptoms after inadvertent exposure to low concentration products and are otherwise improving may be managed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any patient with systemic symptoms, severe exposure, or in whom the diagnosis is unclear. Consult a gastroenterologist to perform endoscopy in any patient drooling, stridor, persistent vomiting or dysphagia or a significant ingestion. Patients with severe or extensive dermal burns should be evaluated by a burn specialist. Patients with eye burns should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with deliberate ingestions, eye exposure, or symptoms should be sent to a health care facility for observation until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    6.3.3) DISPOSITION/INHALATION EXPOSURE
    6.3.3.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/INHALATION
    A) Medical observation is recommended for 24 to 48 hours following inhalation exposure, as onset of acute lung injury may be delayed (Pohanish, 2002)

Monitoring

    A) Depending on the exposure, different laboratory studies are recommended. For patients with systemic or moderate to severe symptoms, obtain a complete blood count, electrolytes, urinalysis, and baseline renal function and liver enzyme measurements.
    B) Monitor methemoglobin concentration in patients with cyanosis or symptoms.
    C) In addition, careful monitoring of the patient's acid-base balance and continuous cardiac monitoring may be necessary.
    D) Chest radiographs are recommended in patients with inhalational exposure or respiratory symptoms.
    E) Phenol levels are not readily available or useful in exposed patients.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) DILUTION/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Dilution with water may enhance absorption of phenol and should be avoided.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) If endoscopy is to be performed, activated charcoal may interfere with visualization of involved areas. However, phenol is adsorbed to activated charcoal in vitro (Decker et al, 1968). Administration of activated charcoal soon after ingestion may be worthwhile.
    2) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) DILUTION: May enhance absorption of phenol, and should be avoided.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) If endoscopy is to be performed, activated charcoal may interfere with visualization of involved areas. However, phenol is adsorbed to activated charcoal in vitro (Decker et al, 1968) and may be worthwhile after large ingestions.
    2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) NASOGASTRIC TUBE
    1) Phenol has irritant effects at concentrations of 1.5% or greater (Fed Reg, 1992).
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider insertion of a small, flexible nasogastric tube to aspirate gastric contents after large, recent ingestion of caustics. The risk of worsening mucosal injury (including perforation) must be weighed against the potential benefit.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric emptying.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Alert patients - place in Trendelenburg and left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Obtunded or unconscious patients - cuffed endotracheal intubation. COMPLICATIONS:
    1) Complications of gastric aspiration may include: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications.
    D) NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) DILUTION may enhance absorption of phenol (Conning & Hayes, 1970).
    2) Giving CASTOR OIL or MINERAL OIL to slow phenol absorption from the stomach is NOT RECOMMENDED. Phenols are soluble in oil, and the benefit of treating with castor oil and/or mineral oil has not been documented by clinical studies.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treatment is primarily supportive and includes monitoring for the development of methemoglobinemia, seizures, and dysrhythmias. Monitoring of acid-base balance and renal and liver function is also suggested.
    a) Treatment of seizures may include the use of diazepam or phenobarbital.
    b) Treatment of methemoglobinemia may require the use of oxygen and methylene blue.
    2) Peritoneal or hemodialysis will NOT enhance the elimination of phenolic compounds.
    3) Ocular and dermal exposures should be irrigated with copious amounts of water.
    a) Decontamination of dermal exposures with polyethylene 300 or 400 or isopropyl alcohol may be considered.
    4) Inhalation exposures should be treated with adequate ventilation and oxygenation. Patients should be monitored for respiratory distress.
    B) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    C) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Determine the methemoglobin concentration and evaluate the patient for clinical effects of methemoglobinemia (ie, dyspnea, headache, fatigue, CNS depression, tachycardia, metabolic acidosis). Treat patients with symptomatic methemoglobinemia with methylene blue (this usually occurs at methemoglobin concentrations above 20% to 30%, but may occur at lower methemoglobin concentrations in patients with anemia, or underlying pulmonary or cardiovascular disorders). Administer oxygen while preparing for methylene blue therapy.
    2) METHYLENE BLUE
    a) INITIAL DOSE/ADULT OR CHILD: 1 mg/kg IV over 5 to 30 minutes; a repeat dose of up to 1 mg/kg may be given 1 hour after the first dose if methemoglobin levels remain greater than 30% or if signs and symptoms persist. NOTE: Methylene blue is available as follows: 50 mg/10 mL (5 mg/mL or 0.5% solution) single-dose ampules (Prod Info PROVAYBLUE(TM) intravenous injection, 2016) and 10 mg/1 mL (1% solution) vials (Prod Info methylene blue 1% intravenous injection, 2011). REPEAT DOSES: Additional doses may be required, especially for substances with prolonged absorption, slow elimination, or those that form metabolites that produce methemoglobin. NOTE: Large doses of methylene blue may cause methemoglobinemia or hemolysis (Howland, 2006). Improvement is usually noted shortly after administration if diagnosis is correct. Consider other diagnoses or treatment options if no improvement has been observed after several doses. If intravenous access cannot be established, methylene blue may also be given by intraosseous infusion. Methylene blue should not be given by subcutaneous or intrathecal injection (Prod Info methylene blue 1% intravenous injection, 2011; Herman et al, 1999). NEONATES: DOSE: 0.3 to 1 mg/kg (Hjelt et al, 1995).
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: G-6-PD deficiency (methylene blue may cause hemolysis), known hypersensitivity to methylene blue, methemoglobin reductase deficiency (Shepherd & Keyes, 2004)
    c) FAILURE: Failure of methylene blue therapy suggests: inadequate dose of methylene blue, inadequate decontamination, NADPH dependent methemoglobin reductase deficiency, hemoglobin M disease, sulfhemoglobinemia, or G-6-PD deficiency. Methylene blue is reduced by methemoglobin reductase and nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) to leukomethylene blue. This in turn reduces methemoglobin. Red blood cells of patients with G-6-PD deficiency do not produce enough NADPH to convert methylene blue to leukomethylene blue (do Nascimento et al, 2008).
    d) DRUG INTERACTION: Concomitant use of methylene blue with serotonergic drugs, including serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRIs), triptans, and ergot alkaloids may increase the risk of potentially fatal serotonin syndrome (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2011; Stanford et al, 2010; Prod Info methylene blue 1% IV injection, 2011).
    3) TOLUIDINE BLUE OR TOLONIUM CHLORIDE (GERMANY)
    a) DOSE: 2 to 4 mg/kg intravenously over 5 minutes. Dose may be repeated in 30 minutes (Nemec, 2011; Lindenmann et al, 2006; Kiese et al, 1972).
    b) SIDE EFFECTS: Hypotension with rapid intravenous administration. Vomiting, diarrhea, excessive sweating, hypotension, dysrhythmias, hemolysis, agranulocytosis and acute renal insufficiency after overdose (Dunipace et al, 1992; Hix & Wilson, 1987; Winek et al, 1969; Teunis et al, 1970; Marquez & Todd, 1959).
    c) CONTRAINDICATIONS: G-6-PD deficiency; may cause hemolysis.
    D) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY
    a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    2) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/INDICATIONS
    1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek et al, 2010).
    b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    3) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    4) PROCAINAMIDE
    a) PROCAINAMIDE/INDICATIONS
    1) An alternative drug in the treatment of PVCs or recurrent ventricular tachycardia when lidocaine is contraindicated or not effective. It should be avoided when the ingestion involves agents with quinidine-like effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines, chloroquine, antidysrhythmics) and when the ECG reveals QRS widening or QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose(Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    b) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT LOADING DOSE
    1) 20 to 50 milligrams/minute IV until dysrhythmia is suppressed or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%), or a total dose of 17 milligrams/kilogram is given (1.2 grams for a 70 kilogram person) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ALTERNATIVE DOSING: 100 mg every 5 minutes until dysrhythmia is controlled, or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%) or 17 mg/kg have been given (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) MAXIMUM DOSE: 17 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) PROCAINAMIDE/CONTROLLED INFUSION
    1) In conscious patients, procainamide should be administered as a controlled infusion (20 milligrams/minute) because of the risk of QT prolongation and its hypotensive effects (Link et al, 2015)
    d) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) 1 to 4 milligrams/minute via an intravenous infusion (Neumar et al, 2010).
    e) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE
    1) 15 milligrams/kilogram IV/Intraosseously over 30 to 60 minutes; discontinue if hypotension develops or the QRS widens by 50% (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    f) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Initiate at 20 mcg/kg/minute and increase in 10 mcg/kg/minute increments every 15 to 30 minutes until desired effect is achieved; up to 80 mcg/kg/minute (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    g) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAXIMUM DOSE
    1) 2 grams/day (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    h) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) ECG, blood pressure, and blood concentrations (Prod Info procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, 2011). Procainamide can produce hypotension and QT prolongation (Link et al, 2015).
    i) AVOID
    1) Avoid in patients with QT prolongation and CHF (Neumar et al, 2010).
    E) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    F) BURN
    1) There is little information regarding the use of endoscopy, corticosteroids or surgery in the setting of concentrated phenol ingestion. The following information is derived from experience with other corrosives.
    G) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE
    1) SUMMARY: Obtain consultation concerning endoscopy as soon as possible, and perform endoscopy within the first 24 hours when indicated.
    2) INDICATIONS: Endoscopy should be performed in adults with a history of deliberate ingestion, adults with any signs or symptoms attributable to inadvertent ingestion, and in children with stridor, vomiting, or drooling after unintentional ingestion (Crain et al, 1984). Endoscopy should also be performed in children with dysphagia or refusal to swallow, significant oral burns, or abdominal pain after unintentional ingestion (Gaudreault et al, 1983; Nuutinen et al, 1994). Children and adults who are asymptomatic after accidental ingestion do not require endoscopy (Gupta et al, 2001; Lamireau et al, 2001; Gorman et al, 1992).
    3) RISKS: Numerous large case series attest to the relative safety and utility of early endoscopy in the management of caustic ingestion.
    a) REFERENCES: (Dogan et al, 2006; Symbas et al, 1983; Crain et al, 1984a; Gaudreault et al, 1983a; Schild, 1985; Moazam et al, 1987; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989; Previtera et al, 1990; Zargar et al, 1991; Vergauwen et al, 1991; Gorman et al, 1992)
    4) The risk of perforation during endoscopy is minimized by (Zargar et al, 1991):
    a) Advancing across the cricopharynx under direct vision
    b) Gently advancing with minimal air insufflation
    c) Never retroverting or retroflexing the endoscope
    d) Using a pediatric flexible endoscope
    e) Using extreme caution in advancing beyond burn lesion areas
    f) Most authors recommend endoscopy within the first 24 hours of injury, not advancing the endoscope beyond areas of severe esophageal burns, and avoiding endoscopy during the subacute phase of healing when tissue slough increases the risk of perforation (5 to 15 days after ingestion) (Zargar et al, 1991).
    5) GRADING
    a) Several scales for grading caustic injury exist. The likelihood of complications such as strictures, obstruction, bleeding, and perforation is related to the severity of the initial burn (Zargar et al, 1991):
    b) Grade 0 - Normal examination
    c) Grade 1 - Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa; strictures unlikely.
    d) Grade 2A - Friability, hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, whitish membranes, exudates and superficial ulcerations; strictures unlikely.
    e) Grade 2B - Grade 2A plus deep discreet or circumferential ulceration; strictures may develop.
    f) Grade 3A - Multiple ulcerations and small scattered areas of necrosis; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
    g) Grade 3B - Extensive necrosis through visceral wall; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation, or gastrointestinal bleeding are more likely than with 3A.
    6) FOLLOW UP - If burns are found, follow 10 to 20 days later with barium swallow or esophagram.
    7) SCINTIGRAPHY - Scans utilizing radioisotope labelled sucralfate (technetium 99m) were performed in 22 patients with caustic ingestion and compared with endoscopy for the detection of esophageal burns. Two patients had minimal residual isotope activity on scanning but normal endoscopy and two patients had normal activity on scan but very mild erythema on endoscopy. Overall the radiolabeled sucralfate scan had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 84% and negative predictive value of 100% for detecting clinically significant burns in this population (Millar et al, 2001). This may represent an alternative to endoscopy, particularly in young children, as no sedation is required for this procedure. Further study is required.
    8) MINIPROBE ULTRASONOGRAPHY - was performed in 11 patients with corrosive ingestion . Findings were categorized as grade 0 (distinct muscular layers without thickening, grade I (distinct muscular layers with thickening), grade II (obscured muscular layers with indistinct margins) and grade III (muscular layers that could not be differentiated). Findings were further categorized as to whether the worst appearing image involved part of the circumference (type a) or the whole circumference (type b). Strictures did not develop in patients with grade 0 (5 patients) or grade I (4 patients) lesions. Transient stricture formation developed in the only patient with grade IIa lesions, and stricture requiring repeated dilatation developed in the only patient with grade IIIb lesions (Kamijo et al, 2004).
    H) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) CORROSIVE INGESTION/SUMMARY: The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of caustic ingestion is controversial. Most animal studies have involved alkali-induced injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973). Most human studies have been retrospective and generally involve more alkali than acid-induced injury and small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury.
    2) FIRST DEGREE BURNS: These burns generally heal well and rarely result in stricture formation (Zargar et al, 1989; Howell et al, 1992). Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in these patients (Howell et al, 1992).
    3) SECOND DEGREE BURNS: Some authors recommend corticosteroid treatment to prevent stricture formation in patients with a second degree, deep-partial thickness burn (Howell et al, 1992). However, no well controlled human study has documented efficacy. Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in patients with a second degree, superficial-partial thickness burn (Caravati, 2004; Howell et al, 1992).
    4) THIRD DEGREE BURNS: Some authors have recommended steroids in this group as well (Howell et al, 1992). A high percentage of patients with third degree burns go on to develop strictures with or without corticosteroid therapy and the risk of infection and perforation may be increased by corticosteroid use. Most authors feel that the risk outweighs any potential benefit and routine use is not recommended (Boukthir et al, 2004; Oakes et al, 1982; Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Include active gastrointestinal bleeding and evidence of gastric or esophageal perforation. Corticosteroids are thought to be ineffective if initiated more than 48 hours after a burn (Howell, 1987).
    6) DOSE: Administer daily oral doses of 0.1 milligram/kilogram of dexamethasone or 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram of prednisone. Continue therapy for a total of 3 weeks and then taper (Haller et al, 1971; Marshall, 1979). An alternative regimen in children is intravenous prednisolone 2 milligrams/kilogram/day followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks then tapered (Anderson et al, 1990).
    7) ANTIBIOTICS: Animal studies suggest that the addition of antibiotics can prevent the infectious complications associated with corticosteroid use in the setting of caustic burns. Antibiotics are recommended if corticosteroids are used or if perforation or infection is suspected. Agents that cover anaerobes and oral flora such as penicillin, ampicillin, or clindamycin are appropriate (Rosenberg et al, 1953).
    8) STUDIES
    a) ANIMAL
    1) Some animal studies have suggested that corticosteroid therapy may reduce the incidence of stricture formation after severe alkaline corrosive injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973a).
    2) Animals treated with steroids and antibiotics appear to do better than animals treated with steroids alone (Haller & Bachman, 1964).
    3) Other studies have shown no evidence of reduced stricture formation in steroid treated animals (Reyes et al, 1974). An increased rate of esophageal perforation related to steroid treatment has been found in animal studies (Knox et al, 1967).
    b) HUMAN
    1) Most human studies have been retrospective and/or uncontrolled and generally involve small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury. No study has proven a reduced incidence of stricture formation from steroid use in human caustic ingestions (Haller et al, 1971; Hawkins et al, 1980; Yarington & Heatly, 1963; Adam & Brick, 1982).
    2) META ANALYSIS
    a) Howell et al (1992), analyzed reports concerning 361 patients with corrosive esophageal injury published in the English language literature since 1956 (10 retrospective and 3 prospective studies). No patients with first degree burns developed strictures. Of 228 patients with second or third degree burns treated with corticosteroids and antibiotics, 54 (24%) developed strictures. Of 25 patients with similar burn severity treated without steroids or antibiotics, 13 (52%) developed strictures (Howell et al, 1992).
    b) Another meta-analysis of 10 studies found that in patients with second degree esophageal burns from caustics, the overall rate of stricture formation was 14.8% in patients who received corticosteroids compared with 36% in patients who did not receive corticosteroids (LoVecchio et al, 1996).
    c) Another study combined results of 10 papers evaluating therapy for corrosive esophageal injury in humans published between January 1991 and June 2004. There were a total of 572 patients, all patients received corticosteroids in 6 studies, in 2 studies no patients received steroids, and in 2 studies, treatment with and without corticosteroids was compared. Of 109 patients with grade 2 esophageal burns who were treated with corticosteroids, 15 (13.8%) developed strictures, compared with 2 of 32 (6.3%) patients with second degree burns who did not receive steroids (Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    3) Smaller studies have questioned the value of steroids (Ferguson et al, 1989; Anderson et al, 1990), thus they should be used with caution.
    4) Ferguson et al (1989) retrospectively compared 10 patients who did not receive antibiotics or steroids with 31 patients who received both antibiotics and steroids in a study of caustic ingestion and found no difference in the incidence of esophageal stricture between the two groups (Ferguson et al, 1989).
    5) A randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial involving 60 children with lye or acid induced esophageal injury did not find an effect of corticosteroids on the incidence of stricture formation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    a) These 60 children were among 131 patients who were managed and followed-up for ingestion of caustic material from 1971 through 1988; 88% of them were between 1 and 3 years old (Anderson et al, 1990).
    b) All patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy after being randomized to receive either no steroids or a course consisting initially of intravenous prednisolone (2 milligrams/kilogram per day) followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks prior to tapering and discontinuation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    c) Six (19%), 15 (48%), and 10 (32%) of those in the treatment group had first, second and third degree esophageal burns, respectively. In contrast, 13 (45%), 5 (17%), and 11 (38%) of the control group had the same levels of injury (Anderson et al, 1990).
    d) Ten (32%) of those receiving steroids and 11 (38%) of the control group developed strictures. Four (13%) of those receiving steroids and 7 (24%) of the control group required esophageal replacement. All but 1 of the 21 children who developed strictures had severe circumferential burns on initial esophagoscopy (Anderson et al, 1990).
    e) Because of the small numbers of patients in this study, it lacked the power to reliably detect meaningful differences in outcome between the treatment groups (Anderson et al, 1990).
    6) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of caustic ingestion in humans has been associated with gastric perforation (Cleveland et al, 1963) and fatal pulmonary embolism (Aceto et al, 1970).
    I) SURGICAL PROCEDURE
    1) SUMMARY: Initially if severe esophageal burns are found a string may be placed in the stomach to facilitate later dilation. Insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube after confirmation of a circumferential burn may prevent strictures. Dilation is indicated after 2 to 4 weeks if strictures are confirmed. If dilation is unsuccessful colonic intraposition or gastric tube placement may be needed. Early laparotomy should be considered in patients with evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns on endoscopy.
    2) STRING - If a second degree or circumferential burn of the esophagus is found a string may be placed in the stomach to avoid false channel and to provide a guide for later dilation procedures (Gandhi et al, 1989).
    3) STENT - The insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube or stent immediately after endoscopically proven deep circumferential burns is preferred by some surgeons to prevent stricture formation (Mills et al, 1978; (Wijburg et al, 1985; Coln & Chang, 1986).
    a) STUDY - In a study of 11 children with deep circumferential esophageal burns after caustic ingestion, insertion of a silicone rubber nasogastric tube for 5 to 6 weeks without steroids or antibiotics was associated with stricture formation in only one case (Wijburg et al, 1989).
    4) DILATION - Dilation should be performed at 1 to 4 week intervals when stricture is present(Gundogdu et al, 1992). Repeated dilation may be required over many months to years in some patients. Successful dilation of gastric antral strictures has also been reported (Hogan & Polter, 1986; Treem et al, 1987).
    5) COLONIC REPLACEMENT - Intraposition of colon may be necessary if dilation fails to provide an adequate sized esophagus (Chiene et al, 1974; Little et al, 1988; Huy & Celerier, 1988).
    6) LAPAROTOMY/LAPAROSCOPY - Several authors advocate laparotomy or laparoscopy in patients with endoscopic evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns to evaluate for the presence of transmural gastric or esophageal necrosis (Cattan et al, 2000; Estrera et al, 1986; Meredith et al, 1988; Wu & Lai, 1993).
    a) STUDY - In a retrospective study of patients with extensive transmural esophageal necrosis after caustic ingestion, all 4 patients treated in the conventional manner (esophagoscopy, steroids, antibiotics, and repeated evaluation for the occurrence of esophagogastric necrosis and perforation) died while all 3 patients treated with early laparotomy and immediate esophagogastric resection survived (Estrera et al, 1986).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section where appropriate.
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Decontamination may be accomplished with polyethylene glycol 300 or 400, isopropyl alcohol, or copious amounts of SOAPY water. Water alone may be harmful. Decontamination personnel should take precautions.
    B) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) A solvent cleaner with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions may be used to remove phenol from the skin surface if readily available prior to irrigation.
    2) Undiluted polyethylene glycol 300 or 400 may be a useful solvent (Brown et al, 1975), however it was not shown to be more effective than copious (deluge) quantities of water in animals (Pullin et al, 1978).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old male worker had 80% phenol spilled on both knees when attempting to unhook a transfer pump from a tanker (Wahl et al, 1995). Despite immediate worksite irrigation, the patient required medical evaluation for ongoing pain with second degree burns observed on both knees. Unintentional irrigation with Golytely(R) (PEG - molecular weight 3550) instead of PEG (MW 300 to 400) resulted in immediate improvement in the pain. The patient was discharged with no long term sequelae reported.
    a) The authors noted that this form of long chain PEG solution may require further study, but noted the relatively easy access to Golytely(R) in most emergency centers.
    4) Based on the animal model, isopropyl alcohol appears to be the decontaminant of choice in the treatment of limited phenol burns (less than 5% total body surface). Isopropyl alcohol is readily available, more efficacious than water, and allows less systemic absorption than water (Hunter et al, 1992).
    5) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    C) PERSONNEL PROTECTION
    1) Decontamination personnel should wear rubber gloves. A soapy bath is taken after treatment.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section where appropriate.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Peritoneal or hemodialysis will NOT enhance the elimination of phenolic compounds. Charcoal hemoperfusion has been successful in one case.
    B) DIALYSIS
    1) Peritoneal and hemodialysis are of no value in removal of phenol and related compounds, but hemodialysis may be used to support uncontrolled acid-base or fluid and electrolyte problems.
    C) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Charcoal hemoperfusion (CHP) was associated with improved clinical status and significantly decreased total and free phenol concentrations in an adult who was unintentionally injected with 30 mL of 89% phenol (26.9 grams or 0.44 mg/kg of body weight) instead of the typical therapeutic dose for treatment of chronic pain (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).
    a) Charcoal hemoperfusion was initiated 4.5 hours after the phenol injection and was performed for 6 hours and 20 minutes. The initial blood total and free phenol concentrations were roughly 180 mcg/mL and 125 mcg/mL, respectively. Total phenol was less than 75 mcg/mL and free phenol less than 25 mcg/mL at the end of hemoperfusion, with concentrations near zero at 38 hours post phenol injection (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996).

Case Reports

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL
    a) A 52-year-old woman, after ingesting 1 ounce of 89% phenol, developed coma, respiratory arrest, hypotension requiring pressor agent therapy, severe supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, and metabolic acidosis. Eighteen hours after ingestion, she suffered a grand mal seizure. The patient had no renal or hepatic abnormalities. Eight days after ingestion, esophagoscopy showed streaky hyperkeratosis, moderate erythema, and slightly friable mucosa. Six months later, there was no evidence of stricture or impaired motility (Haddad et al, 1979).
    b) Ingestion of 250 mL of a mixture of 6 isomeric xylenols by a 59-year-old man resulted in depression of consciousness, constricted pupils, nausea, vomiting, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, cardiac and renal failure, black urine, and death in 16 hours. Serum phenol concentrations were 17.6 mg/L (3.7 hours), 16.7 mg/L (5.3 hours), 32.8 mg/L (11.2 hours), and 8.5 mg/L at 16 hours (Watson et al, 1986).
    c) A 27-year-old woman at 30 weeks of pregnancy accidentally ingested 50 g of resorcinol, and developed unconsciousness, drowsiness, tonic-clonic seizures, hypothermia (35.2 degrees C), and respiratory failure. The laboratory analysis revealed leukocytosis (25,000/mm(3)), high bilirubin levels (direct-reacting bilirubin, 4.5; total bilirubin, 8 as highest levels), severe metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.85; pCO2, 24 mmHg; PO2, 56 mmHg; HCO3, 3 mmol/L; BE, -25 mmol/L), and green-colored urine. The CT scan showed a diffuse edema in brain. Following an urgent cesarean delivery, the newborn was found to be apneic, cyanotic, and bradycardic with Apgar scores of 4-5 at 1 and 5 minutes. At the neonatal ICU, the infant was tachypneic (88/min), hypothermic (35.1 degrees C), hypotensive (40/20 mmHg), with a pulse of 160/min. The infant's blood samples showed hypoxia and metabolic acidosis (pH, 6.95; PO2, 26 mmHg; PCO2, 24 mmHg). Diffuse pulmonary atelectasis and increased opacity of the lung fields were seen in the lung x-ray. Approximately 24 hours after delivery, the newborn was pronounced dead. Following supportive therapy, the mother was discharged home on day 15 (Duran et al, 2004).
    2) DERMAL
    a) A 4-week-old infant was given undiluted Castellani's paint in error for seborrheic dermatitis (1:6 dilution prescribed). In 5 hours she was listless, and seizing (not controlled by anticonvulsants). The phenol was washed off; but the patient died within 17 hours. Postmortem examination showed pulmonary edema, visceral congestion, and renal cell vacuolization.
    b) A 27-year-old male worker had 80% phenol spilled on both knees when attempting to unhook a transfer pump from a tanker (Wahl et al, 1995). Despite immediate worksite irrigation, the patient required medical evaluation for ongoing pain with second degree burns observed on both knees. Inadvertent irrigation with Golytely (PEG - molecular weight 3550) instead of PEG (MW 300 to 400) resulted in immediate improvement in the pain. The patient was discharged with no long-term sequelae reported.
    3) OCULAR
    a) A 40-year-old diabetic woman put a drop of Sting Eze(R) in her eye. She experienced immediate pain and rinsed the eye. She was examined several hours later, and was found to have decreased visual acuity, intense photophobia, and evidence of corneal epithelial damage (with a denuded patch covering 20% of the cornea). The eye recovered with no sequelae 2 weeks later (Blanchard, 1989).
    b) An 83-year-old woman with end-stage glaucoma experienced intense pain after instillation of Sting Eze(R) into the eye. Upon examination one week later there was no corneal epithelial defect (Blanchard, 1989).
    4) ROUTE-OTHER
    a) A syndrome of rebound pharyngitis, dubbed "pharyngitis medicamentosa", has been described in patients using a phenol-containing throat spray for more than one week (Halwell, 1989).
    b) A 49-year-old woman developed acute dyspnea after spraying a phenol-containing throat spray 5 times for treatment of sore throat. She was admitted in cardiorespiratory arrest, secondary to epiglottitis and airway obstruction. She was resuscitated and recovered uneventfully after artificial ventilation for 48 hours (Ho & Hollinrake, 1989).

Summary

    A) TOXIC DOSE: ADULT: Acute ingestion of as little as 1 g of phenol in adults has resulted in death, but toxicity has been noted at significantly lower doses. The minimum toxic dose of phenol and related compounds is not well established in the literature, which consists mostly of case reports. PEDIATRIC: Reportedly, ingestions of 50 to 500 mg in infants have been lethal.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: A typical oral dose in lozenges for oral use is 32.5 mg phenol per lozenge every 2 hours as needed. In adults, 0.6 to 1.3 g phenol daily has been used therapeutically. PEDIATRIC: In children over the age of 3, phenol lozenges containing 10 to 500 mg may be given every 2 hours. Chloraseptic liquids and sprays have also been used in children and adults.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) THERAPEUTIC DOSE (ORAL) -
    a) CHLORASEPTIC(R) LOZENGES contain 32.5 milligrams of phenol per lozenge as well as menthol (10 milligrams/lozenge) and benzocaine (6 milligrams/lozenge).
    b) The recommended dose for adults and children over 12 years old is 1 lozenge every 2 hours if needed.
    c) A total daily dose of 390 milligrams of phenol is possible (Prod Info, 1991).
    d) 0.6 to 1.3 grams daily has been used therapeutically in adults (Leider & Moser, 1961).
    e) The higher dose has produced side effects of giddiness, weak pulse, and increased perspiration.
    2) LIQUID -
    a) CHLORASEPTIC(R) LIQUID (includes spray, gargle, and aerosol spray) contains 1.4 percent phenol (Prod Info, 1991).
    b) SPRAY(PUMP) - Available in 6 fluid ounce bottle containing a total of 2.52 grams of phenol and 12.5 percent ethanol.
    1) ADULTS AND CHILDREN OVER 12 YEARS - Spray 5 times and swallow every 2 hours if needed.
    c) GARGLE - Available in 12 fluid ounce bottle containing a total of 5.04 grams of phenol and 12.5 percent ethanol.
    1) ADULTS AND CHILDREN OVER 12 YEARS - Gargle for 15 seconds and expectorate every 2 hours.
    d) AEROSOL SPRAY - Available in 1.5 ounce nitrogen propelled aerosol spray bottle containing a total of 0.63 gram of phenol.
    1) ADULTS AND CHILDREN OVER 12 YEARS - Spray directly on affected area for 2 seconds and swallow every 2 hours.
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) In children over 3, lozenges containing 10 to 50 milligrams may be given every 2 hours (Fed Reg, 1982).
    2) CHLORASEPTIC(R) LOZENGES contain 32.5 milligrams of phenol per lozenge as well as menthol (10 milligrams lozenge) and benzocaine (6 milligrams/lozenge). Children 6 to 12 years old the recommended dose is 1 lozenge every 2 hours if needed, not to exceed 9 lozenges per day (292.5 milligrams/day) (Prod Info, 1991).
    3) CHILDREN'S CHLORASEPTIC(R) LOZENGES (do NOT contain phenol) contain 5 milligrams of benzocaine per lozenge. The recommended dose for adults and children over 2-years-old is 1 lozenge every 2 hours if needed (Prod Info, 1991).
    4) CHLORASEPTIC(R) LIQUID (includes spray, gargle, and aerosol spray) contains 1.4 percent phenol (Prod Info, 1991).
    5) SPRAY(PUMP) - Available in 6 fluid ounce bottle containing a total of 2.52 grams of phenol and 12.5 percent ethanol.
    a) CHILDREN 2 TO 12 YEARS - Spray 3 times and swallow every 2 hours if needed.
    6) GARGLE - Available in 12 fluid ounce bottle containing a total of 5.04 grams of phenol and 12.5 percent ethanol.
    a) CHILDREN 6 TO 12 YEARS - Gargle with 10 milliliters for 15 seconds and expectorate every 2 hours.
    7) AEROSOL SPRAY - Available in 1.5 ounce nitrogen propelled aerosol spray bottle containing a total of 0.63 gram of phenol.
    a) CHILDREN 2 TO 12 YEARS - Spray directly on affected area for 1 second and swallow every 2 hours.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Ingestion of 1.5 grams of phenol has been reported to be lethal (Lewis, 2000).
    2) Probable oral lethal dose was reported at 50 to 500 mcg/kg. Ingestion of 1 gram of phenol has been reported to be lethal(Pohanish, 2002).
    3) A minimum lethal dose has been estimated to be 140 mg/kg (Hathaway et al, 1996; HSDB, 2003).
    4) An average fatal dose of 15 grams of phenol has been calculated for humans (OHM/TADS , 2000).
    5) Death occurred in 10 minutes after the ingestion of as little as 4.8 grams of pure phenol (HSDB, 2003).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed unconsciousness, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, tachycardia, hypotension, leukocytosis, and severe metabolic acidosis after unintentional ingestion of 75 grams of resorcinol instead of glucose. Despite supportive therapy, she died several hours after ingestion (Bulut et al, 2006).
    2) CASE SERIES: In a series of 13 adult patients who ingested 16 to 32 grams and were lavaged, the mortality was 15% (Clarke & Brown, 1906). Prior to the use of lavage, Falck reported a 65% mortality in 46 cases (Clarke & Brown, 1906).
    3) SPILLS: Small spills of 80% to 100% phenol solutions to cheeks and scalp (Gibson, 1905) and to hip, thigh, and scrotum (Turtle & Dolan, 1922) have been fatal.
    C) CHILD/INFANT
    1) Ingestion of 50 to 500 milligrams in infants was reported to be a lethal amount, but no documentation was provided (Deichmann & Gerarde, 1969).
    2) Death has been reported from application of 2 coin-sized patches to the groin of a 7-day-old infant (Abrahams, 1900) and from application of a 2% solution for 11 hours to an infant's umbilicus under a closed bandage (Hinkel & Kintzel, 1968).
    3) Application of a 2% aqueous solution as a moist dressing on burns over 30% of the body surface area were fatal in one case. Five percent phenol skin compresses to several hundred children led to 2 deaths (Lucas & Lane, 1895).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL
    a) Ingestions of 45 grams (Clarke & Brown, 1906), 56 grams (Bennett et al, 1950), and 65 grams (Lewin, 1929) were associated with coma and collapse, but survival.
    b) Despite multiple complications, a 44-year-old recovered after hemodialysis and intensive supportive care from an oral ingestion of 150 grams of creosol (Wu et al, 1998).
    c) Spiller & Quadrani (1991) reported the largest oral dose producing no effect from a 26% phenol disinfectant solution to be 30 mL (7.8 grams) in a series of 57 cases.
    2) DERMAL (SYSTEMIC EFFECT)
    a) HIGH CONCENTRATION: Upper body skin contact to a 78% aqueous solution for 2 to 5 minutes produced coma, but survival (Duverneuil & Ravier, 1962).
    b) MEDIUM CONCENTRATION: Application of 2.4 grams of phenol as a 40% solution to a giant hairy nevus of a healthy 10-year-old boy resulted in multi-focal and coupled premature ventricular complexes which responded to bretylium sulfate 250 mg intravenously but not to lidocaine, 100 mg intravenously (Warner & Harper, 1985).
    c) LOW CONCENTRATION: A 2.5% solution applied as a leg compress resulted in coma. Application of a 1% lotion for 7 to 17 days to scalp, arms, chest, back, and legs resulted in seizures and coma with survival (Light, 1931).
    3) LOCAL EFFECTS
    a) LOW CONCENTRATION: Superficial necrosis and sloughing occurs with 5% solutions applied to skin or mucous membranes. Solutions greater than 1.5% are irritating (Fed Reg, 1982).
    b) MEDIUM CONCENTRATION: Keratolytic, neurolytic, and tissue destruction occurs with 10 to 40 percent concentrations. Superficial necrosis and sloughing occurs with 5% to 40% concentrations.
    4) PARENTERAL
    a) A 50-year-old man with chronic pain was inadvertently injected with 10 cc phenol 89% (intended dose: 10 cc of 6% phenol) and developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, along with acute renal failure. Treatment included mechanical ventilation for several days and hemodialysis for 12 days. After acute symptoms resolved, the patient developed polyuria for several months. Renal function returned to normal within 6 months, and lung nodules had completely resolved (Gupta et al, 2008).
    b) Injection of 30 mL of 89% phenol, equivalent to 26.9 grams or 0.44 g/kg of body weight, resulted in respiratory arrest, shock, ventricular tachycardia and coma in a 50-year-old (Christiansen & Klaman, 1996). The patient survived with medical treatment which included administration of vasopressors, charcoal hemoperfusion, sodium bicarbonate, platelets, and blood transfusions.

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) LETHAL CONCENTRATION
    a) DERMAL
    1) Postmortem blood concentration of 2.7 mg/dL was reported in a patient who died from dermal exposure to 30% phenol solution (Soares & Tift, 1982).
    2) Phenol blood concentrations of 0.47 mg /dL (Lewin & Clearly, 1982) and 13.0 mg/dL (Lo Dico et al, 1989) were lethal following dermal exposure.
    3) Following dermal exposure of less than 10% of the body surface area to a pure solution of 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL, a lethal blood concentration of 2.43 mg/dL was reported (Kintz et al, 1992).
    4) Phenol, 1.5 grams in a 50% solution applied to the face resulted in blood phenol concentrations of 6.8 mcg/mL in 1 hour, decreasing to 1 mcg/mL at 4 hours (Litton, 1962).
    5) URINE- After undergoing mechanical dermabrasion and chemical peeling with phenol, an 11-year-old boy with xeroderma pigmentosum developed ventricular tachycardia with a pulse rate of up to 220 beats per minute. One day after the surgery, the urinary phenol concentration was 58.9 mg/dL (ref range: 0 to 20.7 mg/dL). He recovered completely and was discharged home 7 days after surgery without further sequelae (Unlu et al, 2004).
    b) ORAL
    1) Postmortem exam on a 27-year-old man who presumably unintentionally ingested a phenol preparation revealed a free phenol concentration of 60 mcg/mL in the blood and 208 mcg/mL in the urine (Tanaka et al, 1998). Phenol was distributed throughout the body with the following concentrations found by gas chromatography: 106 mcg/g in the brain, 116 mcg/g in the lungs, 166 mcg/g in the liver, and 874 mcg/g in the kidney.
    2) Following ingestion of an unknown amount of solution, postmortem phenol and ortho-cresol concentrations in the blood of a 31-year-old man were 58.3 mcg/mL and 1.9 mcg/mL, respectively (Boatto et al, 2004).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS108-95-2 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Phenol
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 5 ppm
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: BEI, Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    b) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    c) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): URT irr; lung dam; CNS impair
    d) Molecular Weight: 94.11
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS108-95-2 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Phenol
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 5 ppm (19 mg/m(3))
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling: 15.6 ppm (60 mg/m(3)) [15-minute]
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s):
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 250 ppm
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS108-95-2 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Phenol
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): D ; Listed as: Phenol
    a) D : Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity.
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 3 ; Listed as: Phenol
    a) 3 : The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Phenol
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Phenol
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS108-95-2 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Phenol
    2) Table Z-1 for Phenol:
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm: 5
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 19
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: Yes
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: Budavari, 1996; HSDB, 2003; Lewis, 2000; OHM/TADS, 2003; RTECS, 2003
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 180 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 270 mg/kg
    3) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 344 mg/kg
    4) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 127 mg/kg
    5) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 317 mg/kg
    b) 530 mg/kg
    c) 414 mg/kg
    6) LD50- (SKIN)RAT:
    a) 669 mg/kg
    7) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    a) 650 mg/kg
    b) 460 mg/kg
    8) TCLo- (INHALATION)RAT:
    a) 100 mcg/m(3) for 24H/61D-C
    b) 5 mg/m(3) for 4H/17W-I
    c) 150 mcg/m(3) for 8H/26W-I

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) DENATURES PROTEINS: Phenol, in concentrations of 5% or greater, rapidly denatures all proteins with which it comes in contact.
    B) RESPIRATORY STIMULANT: Phenol is reported to cause respiratory stimulation which will produce respiratory alkalosis if sustained.
    C) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA: Some phenols, most notably dinitrophenol or hydroquinone, will cause methemoglobinemia.
    D) CNS STIMULANT: The CNS stimulatory effects may be related to increased acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction (Liao & Oehme, 1980).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Phenol is composed of colorless or white acicular (needle-shaped) crystals when perfectly pure. It is discolored by exposure to light and air, which makes this compound turn pink or red. Discoloration is hastened by the presence of alkalinity or impurities(ACGIH, 2001; Ashford, 2001; Budavari, 1996). Phenol has a burning taste, and its odor has been described as distinctive and aromatic (Budavari, 1996; Lewis, 2000; Lewis, 2001; Lewis, 1998).

Ph

    A) The pH of an aqueous solution of phenol is approximately 6 (Budavari, 1996; ACGIH, 2001).

Molecular Weight

    A) 94.11

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) 0.05 ppm (Hathaway et al, 1996)
    2) In air: 0.04 ppm (Sittig, 1991)
    3) In water: 7.9 ppm (Sittig, 1991)
    4) Lower odor threshold: 0.016 ppm (OHM/TADS , 2000)
    5) Medium odor threshold: 5.9 ppm (OHM/TADS , 2000)
    6) Upper odor threshold: 16.7 ppm (OHM/TADS , 1999)
    B) TASTE THRESHOLD
    1) Lower Taste Threshold: 0.0001 (when chlorinated) (OHM/TADS , 2000)
    2) Drinking Water Limits: 0.01 (OHM/TADS , 2000)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) A 9-month-old dog bathed in a phenol disinfectant, in dilution less than that recommended, developed anorexia, salivation, and muscular twitching immediately following the bath.
    1) Upon examination by the veterinarian 4 days later, the dog had erythematous pruritic skin lesions on less hairy areas and necrotic, pruritic, infected lesions on hairy areas.
    2) The animal was febrile and had a high white blood cell count, with eosinophilia. Symptoms resolved following treatment with parenteral and topical antibiotics (Abdullahi & Adeyanjen, 1983).
    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Signs include gastroenteritis, painful abdomen, weakness, depression, and sternal recumbency.
    2) SMALL ANIMALS (DOGS/CATS)
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Profuse vomiting, diarrhea, salivation, apprehension, ataxia, and panting may progress to muscle fasciculations, shock, methemoglobinemia, and unconsciousness. Hepatic and renal damage may occur within 12 to 24 hours (Coppock et al, 1988).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) Three dogs were inadvertently given phenol (misinformation provided from an Internet site) mixed with 1% ivermectin for use as a monthly heartworm preventative and immediately demonstrated anxiety, hypersalivation, tremors, and panting. Each dog received a total dose of 2,430 mg of phenol. The owner induced vomiting with hydrogen peroxide. Exam revealed severe gingival and lingual ulcerations and areas of gastric erosion with endoscopic assessment.
    a) Treatment consisted of IV fluids, ranitidine (2mg/kg body weight, IV every 12 hr), ampicillin (22 mg/kg body weight, IV every 8 hr), and sucralfate (1 g orally every 8 hr) and pain management. The dogs recovered following intensive supportive care (Gieger et al, 2000).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    5) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) ORAL EXPOSURE
    a) Oral exposure may result in the following:
    b) SMALL ANIMALS
    1) Emesis may be induced when solutions of 5% or less have been ingested in amounts which would be expected to cause systemic symptoms.
    2) Induce emesis with Syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM or subcutaneously.
    3) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    4) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    5) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, castor oil (10 mL/kg), sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    c) LARGE ANIMALS
    1) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    2) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liters), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or milk of magnesia (20 to 30 mL)
    2) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    a) Dermal exposure may result in the following:
    b) A solvent cleaner with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions may be used to remove phenol from the skin surface if readily available prior to irrigation.
    c) Undiluted polyethylene glycol 300 or 400 may be a useful solvent (Brown et al, 1975), however it was not shown to be more effective than copious (deluge) quantities of water in animals (Pullin et al, 1978).
    d) The area should be repeatedly sponged with a number of sponges soaked in PEG. Decontamination personnel should wear rubber gloves. A soapy bath is taken after treatment.
    e) Multiple daily applications of PEG for several days to full thickness on skin injuries in rabbits resulted in renal failure and increased osmolal gap (Herold et al, 1982). There are no data to suggest that a single exposure to PEG for treatment of a phenol burn would be harmful.
    f) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) Wash skin, apply sodium bicarbonate (0.5%) dressings.
    2) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE THERAPY
    a) Give oral adsorbent. Fluid and electrolyte therapy.
    3) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE
    a) N-acetylcysteine may prevent renal and hepatic damage.
    b) DOSE - 140 mg/kg intravenously followed by 50 mg/kg every 4 hours for 15 doses (Coppock et al, 1988).
    4) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    a) Methylene blue 8 mg/kg intravenously or ascorbic acid 50 mg/kg intravenously. Ascorbic acid is the drug of choice in cats (Coppock et al, 1988).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    5) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) ORAL EXPOSURE
    a) Oral exposure may result in the following:
    b) SMALL ANIMALS
    1) Emesis may be induced when solutions of 5% or less have been ingested in amounts which would be expected to cause systemic symptoms.
    2) Induce emesis with Syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM or subcutaneously.
    3) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    4) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    5) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, castor oil (10 mL/kg), sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    c) LARGE ANIMALS
    1) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    2) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liters), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or milk of magnesia (20 to 30 mL)
    2) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    a) Dermal exposure may result in the following:
    b) A solvent cleaner with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions may be used to remove phenol from the skin surface if readily available prior to irrigation.
    c) Undiluted polyethylene glycol 300 or 400 may be a useful solvent (Brown et al, 1975), however it was not shown to be more effective than copious (deluge) quantities of water in animals (Pullin et al, 1978).
    d) The area should be repeatedly sponged with a number of sponges soaked in PEG. Decontamination personnel should wear rubber gloves. A soapy bath is taken after treatment.
    e) Multiple daily applications of PEG for several days to full thickness on skin injuries in rabbits resulted in renal failure and increased osmolal gap (Herold et al, 1982). There are no data to suggest that a single exposure to PEG for treatment of a phenol burn would be harmful.
    f) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1996.
    14) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    15) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1992, pp 1204-1208.
    16) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 7th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 2001.
    17) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    18) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    19) ANON: REPORT; ISS NCI-CG-TR-203, DHHS, Washington, DC, 1980.
    20) Abbate C, Polito I, & Puglisi A: Dermatosis from resorcinal in tyre makers. Br J Ind Med 1989; 46:212-214.
    21) Abrahams R: Pediatrics 1900; 9:241.
    22) Aceto T Jr, Terplan K, & Fiore RR: Chemical burns of the esophagus in children and glucocorticoid therapy. J Med 1970; 1:101-109.
    23) Adam JS & Brick HG: Pediatric caustic ingestion. Ann Otol Laryngol 1982; 91:656-658.
    24) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    25) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    26) Anderson KD, Touse TM, & Randolph JG: A controlled trial of corticosteroids in children with corrosive injury of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:637-640.
    27) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    28) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    29) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 2001.
    30) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 1994.
    31) Atkinson GL & Shupak RC: Acute bronchospasm complicating intercostal nerve block with phenol. Anesth Analg 1989; 68:400-401.
    32) Bailey LH & Bailey EZ: Hortus Third, Macmillan Publishing Company Inc, New York, NY, 1976.
    33) Barrero AF, Sanchez JF, Oltra JE, et al: Oxygenated sesquiterpenes from the wood of Juniperus oxycedrus. Phytochemistry 1991; 30(5):1551-1554.
    34) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    35) Baxter PJ, Adams PH, & Aw TC: Hunter's Diseases of Occupations, 9th ed, Oxford Univ Press, Inc, New York, NY, 2000.
    36) Bennett IL, James DF, & Golden A: Severe acidosis due to phenol poisoning. Ann Intern Med 1950; 32:324-327.
    37) Bentur Y, Shoshani O, Tabak A, et al: Prolonged elimination half-life of phenol after dermal exposure.. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:707-711.
    38) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    39) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    40) Bieniek G: Concentrations of phenol, p-cresol, o-cresol and 2,5-xylenol in the urine of workers employed in the distillation of the phenolic fraction of tar. Occup Environ Medicine 1994; 51:354-356.
    41) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, Vol 4. 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001.
    42) Blanchard DL: Sting Eze keratitis (Letter). Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:791.
    43) Boatto G, Nieddu M, Carta A, et al: Determination of phenol and o-cresol by GC/MS in a fatal poisoning case. Forensic Sci Int 2004; 139:191-194.
    44) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    45) Bouhouch R, El Houari T, Fellat I, et al: Pharmacological therapy in children with nodal reentry tachycardia: when, how and how long to treat the affected patients. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):766-769.
    46) Boukthir S, Fetni I, Mrad SM, et al: [High doses of steroids in the management of caustic esophageal burns in children]. Arch Pediatr 2004; 11(1):13-17.
    47) Boutwell RK & Rosch DK: Cancer Res 1959; 19:413-424.
    48) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    49) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    50) Brown VKH, Box VL, & Simpson BJ: Decontamination procedures for skin exposed to phenolic substances. Arch Environ Health 1975; 30:1-6.
    51) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    52) Bulsiewicz H: Folia Morphol (Warsaw) 1977; 36:13-22.
    53) Bulut M, Turkmen N, Fedakar R, et al: A case report of fatal oral ingestion of resorcinol. Mt Sinai J Med 2006; 73(7):1049-1051.
    54) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    55) Caravati EM: Alkali. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    56) Carlsten C, Hunt SC, & Kaufman JD: Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and coal tar creosote exposure in a railroad worker. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113:96-97.
    57) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    58) Cattan P, Munoz-Bongrand N, & Berney T: Extensive abdominal surgery after caustic ingestion. Ann Surg 2000; 231:519-523.
    59) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    60) Chapman DE, Namkung MJ, & Juchau MR: Benzene and benzene metabolites as embryotoxic agents: effects on cultured rat embryos. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 128:129-137.
    61) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    62) Chen H & Eastmond DA: Synergistic increase in chromosomal breakage within the euchromatin induced by an interaction of the benzene metabolites phenol and hydroquinone in mice. Carcinogenesis 1995; 16:1963-1969.
    63) Chen SL, Wang HC, & Yang PC: Acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung fibrosis after ingestion of a high dose of ortho-phenylphenol. J Formos Med Assoc 2005; 104:585-587.
    64) Chiene KY, Wang PY, & Lu KS: Esophagoplasty of corrosive stricture of the esophagus. Ann Surg 1974; 179:510-515.
    65) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    66) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    67) Christiansen RG & Klaman JS: Successful treatment of phenol poisoning with charcoal hemoperfusion. Vet Human Toxicol 1996; 38:27-28.
    68) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    69) Clarke TW & Brown ED: The value of alcohol in carbolic acid poisoning. JAMA 1906; 46:782-790.
    70) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2B, Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    71) Cleveland WW, Chandler JR, & Lawson RB: Treatment of caustic burns of the esophagus. JAMA 1963; 186:182-183.
    72) Coln D & Chang JHT: Experience with esophageal stenting for caustic burns in children. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21:588-592.
    73) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    74) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    75) Conning DM & Hayes MJ: The dermal toxicity of phenol: an investigation of the most effective first-aid measures. Br J Ind Med 1970; 27:155.
    76) Constan AA, Yang RSH, & Baker DC: A unique pattern of hepatocyte proliferation in F344 rats following long-term exposures to low levels of a chemical mixture of groundwater contaminants. Carcinogenesis 1995; 16:303-310.
    77) Coppock RW, Mostrom MS, & Lillie LE: The toxicology of detergents, bleaches, antiseptics and disinfectants in small animals. Vet Human Toxicol 1988; 30:463-473.
    78) Crain EF, Gershel JC, & Mezey AP: Caustic ingestions. Symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury. Am J Dis Child 1984a; 138(9):863-865.
    79) Crain EF, Gershel JC, & Mezey AP: Caustic ingestions; symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138:863-865.
    80) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    81) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    82) Dart RC, Hurlbut KM, & Kuffner EK: The 5 minute toxicology consult, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
    83) Decker WJ, Combs HF, & Corby DG: Adsorption of drugs and poisons by activated charcoal. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1968; 13:454-460.
    84) Deichmann WB & Gerarde HW: Toxicology of Drugs and Chemicals, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1969.
    85) Dmytryshyn JR, Gribble MJ, & Kassen BO: Chemical face peel complicated by toxic shock syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109:170-171.
    86) Dogan Y, Erkan T, Cokugras FC, et al: Caustic gastroesophageal lesions in childhood: an analysis of 473 cases. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2006; 45(5):435-438.
    87) Dossing M, Wulff CH, & Olsen PZ: Repeated facial palsies after chlorocresol inhalation. J Neur Neurosurg Psych 1986; 49:1452-1454.
    88) Dragun J: The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, 1988.
    89) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    90) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    91) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    92) Dunipace AJ, Beaven R, Noblitt T, et al: Mutagenic potential of toluidine blue evaluated in the Ames test. Mutat Res 1992; 279(4):255-259.
    93) Duran B, Gursoy S, Cetin M, et al: The oral toxicity of resorcinol during pregnancy: a case report. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(5):663-666.
    94) Duverneuil G & Ravier E: Acute toxicity of phenol by cutaneous application. Arch Mal Prof 1962; 23:830-833.
    95) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    96) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    97) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    98) Estrera A, Taylor W, & Mills LJ: Corrosive burns of the esophagus and stomach: a recommendation of an aggressive surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:276-283.
    99) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    100) Ferguson MK, Migliore M, & Staszak VM: Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury. Am J Surg 1989; 157:116-120.
    101) Fisher AA: Irritant and toxic reactions to phenol in topical medications. Cutis 1980; 26:363-392.
    102) Forrest T & Ramage DTO: Cardiac disrhythmia after subtrigonal phenol. Anaesthesia 1987; 42:777-778.
    103) Foxall PJD, Bending MR, & Gartland KPR: Acute renal failure following accidental cutaneous absorption of phenol: application of NMR urinalysis to monitor disease process. Human Toxicol 1989; 9:491-496.
    104) Fu HS, Chu YK, & Liao SQ: Scintigraphic appearance in lysol-induced lung toxicity (images). Clin Nucl Med 2001; 26:655-656.
    105) Gaitan E, Jolley RL, & Lindsay RH: Resorcinol: final goitrogenic product in water from a goitrogenic well. Clin Ecol 1987; 5:176-184.
    106) Gandhi RP, Cooper A, & Barlow BA: Successful management of esophageal stricture without resection or replacement. J Pediatr 1989; 24:745-750.
    107) Gaudreault P, Parent M, & McGuigan MA: Predictability of esophageal injury from signs and symptoms: a study of caustic ingestion in 378 children. Pediatrics 1983; 71:761-770.
    108) Gaudreault P, Parent M, McGuigan MA, et al: Predictability of esophageal injury from signs and symptoms: a study of caustic ingestion in 378 children. Pediatrics 1983a; 71(5):767-770.
    109) Gaudy JH, Tricot C, & Sezeur A: Serious cardiac arrhythmia following preoperatory injection of phenol for splanchnic neurolysis. Canad J Anaesth 1993; 40:357-359.
    110) Gibson W: Clinical cases, death from carbolic acid burn. Queens Med Q 1905; 10:133-134.
    111) Gieger TL, Correa SS, & Taboada J: Phenol poisoning in three dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36:317-321.
    112) Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, & Lewin NA: Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 5th. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT, USA, 1994.
    113) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    114) Gorman RL, Khin-Maung-Gyi MT, & Klein-Schwartz W: Initial symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury in alkaline corrosive ingestions. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:89-94.
    115) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    116) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993, pp 1134-1136.
    117) Gross BG: Cardiac arrhythmias during phenol face peeling. Plas Reconstr Surg 1983; 73:590-594.
    118) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    119) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    120) Gundogdu HZ, Tanyel FC, & Buyukpamukcu N: Conservative treatment of caustic esophageal strictures in children. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27:767-770.
    121) Gupta S, Ashrith G, Chandra D, et al: Acute phenol poisoning: a life-threatening hazard of chronic pain relief. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(3):250-253.
    122) Gupta SK, Croffie JM, & Fitzgerald JF: Is esophagogastroduodenoscopy necessary in all caustic ingestions?. J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 32:50-53.
    123) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    124) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    125) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 4/30/2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    126) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    127) Haddad LM, Dimond KA, & Schweistris JE: Phenol poisoning. JACEP 1979; 8:267.
    128) Haller JA & Bachman K: The comparative effect of current therapy on experimental caustic burns of the esophagus. Pediatrics 1964; 236-245.
    129) Haller JA, Andrews HG, & White JJ: Pathophysiology and management of acute corrosive burns of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 1971; 6:578-584.
    130) Halwell R: Pharyngitis medicamentosa (Letter). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115:995.
    131) Harbison RM: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby, St Louis, MO, 1998, pp 318-319.
    132) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    133) Hashimoto T, IIda H, & Dohi S: Marked increases of aminotransferase levels after cresol ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16:667-669.
    134) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    135) Hawkins DB, Demeter MJ, & Barnett TE: Caustic ingestion: controversies in management. A review of 214 cases. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:98-109.
    136) Haworth S, Lawlor T, & Mortelmans: Salmonella mutagenicity test results for 250 chemicals. Environ Mutagen 1983; 5 Suppl 1:1-142.
    137) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    138) Herman MI, Chyka PA, & Butlse AY: Methylene blue by intraosseous infusion for methemoglobinemia. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33:111-113.
    139) Hernberg S: Scand J Work Environ Health 1983; 9:55.
    140) Herold DA, Rodeheaver GT, & Bellamy WT: Toxicity of topical polyethylene glycol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1982; 65:329-335.
    141) Hinkel GK & Kintzel HW: Phenol poisoning of a newborn through skin resorption. Dtsch Gesundheitswes 1968; 23:2420-2422.
    142) Hix WR & Wilson WR: Toluidine blue staining of the esophagus: a useful adjunct in the panendoscopic evaluation of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113(8):864-865.
    143) Hjelt K, Lund JT, Scherling B, et al: Methaemoglobinaemia among neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84(4):365-370.
    144) Ho SL & Hollinrake K: Acute epiglottitis and Chloraseptic. Br Med J 1989; 298:1584.
    145) Hogan RB & Polter DE: Nonsurgical management of lye-induced antral strictures with hydrostatic balloon dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32:228-230.
    146) Howard PH, Boethling RS, & Jarvis WF: Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1991.
    147) Howard PH: Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals. Volume I: Large Production and Priority Pollutants, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1989.
    148) Howell JM, Dalsey WC, & Hartsell FW: Steroids for the treatment of corrosive esophageal injury: a statistical analysis of past studies. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:421-425.
    149) Howell JM: Alkaline ingestions. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 15:820-825.
    150) Howland MA: Antidotes in Depth. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, Hoffman RS, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp 826-828.
    151) Hsieh GC, Sharma RP, & Parker RDR: Immunological and neurobiochemical alterations induced by repeated oral exposure of phenol in mice. Eur J Pharmacother 1992; 228:107-114.
    152) Hunter DM, Timerding BL, & Leonard RB: Effects of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and polyethylene glycol/industrial methylated spirits in the treatment of acute phenol burns. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21:1303-1307.
    153) Huy PTB & Celerier M: Management of severe caustic stenosis of the hypopharynx and esophagus by ileocolic transposition via suprahyoid or transepiglottic approach. Ann Surg 1988; 207:439-445.
    154) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    155) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    156) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    157) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    158) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    159) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    160) IARC: International Association for Research on Cancer, Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans: Cross Index of Synonyms and Trade names in Volumes 1 to 46, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
    161) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    162) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    163) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    164) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed, Vols 1 & 2, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
    165) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th ed, Vols 1-4. JM Stellman (Ed), (CD ROM Version), International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
    166) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    167) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    168) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    169) Ishchenko VN & Pushkina IK: Gig Sanit 1978; 11:98-100.
    170) Jarvis SN, Straube RC, & Williams ALJ: Illness associated with contamination of drinking water supplies with phenol. Br Med J 1985; 290:1800-1802.
    171) Jones-Price C et al: Report; ISS FCA/NCTR-84/133 Order No PB85-104461/GAR, p 92, 1983b.
    172) Jones-Price C et al: Report; ISS Order No PB83-247726, p 120, 1983.
    173) Kamijo Y, Kondo I, Kokuto M, et al: Miniprobe ultrasonography for determining prognosis in corrosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(5):851-854.
    174) Kamijo Y, Soma K, & Fukuda M: Rabbit syndrome following phenol ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1999; 4:509-511.
    175) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    176) Kiese M , Lorcher W , Weger N , et al: Comparative studies on the effects of toluidine blue and methylene blue on the reduction of ferrihaemoglobin in man and dog. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1972; 4(2):115-118.
    177) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    178) Kintz P, Tracqui A, & Mangin P: Accidental death caused by the absorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol through the skin. Arch Toxicol 1992; 66:298-299.
    179) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    180) Knox WG, Scott JR, & Zintel HA: Bouginage and steroids used singly or in combination in experimental corrosive esophagitis. Ann Surg 1967; 166:930-941.
    181) Kolesnikova TN: Gig Sanit 1972; 10:105-106.
    182) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    183) Korshunov SF: Gig Tr Sostoyanie Spetsificheskikh Funkts Rab Neftekhim Khim Prom-Sti, pp 149-153, 1974.
    184) Koruk ST, Ozyilkan E, Kaya P, et al: Juniper tar poisoning. Clin Toxicol 2005; 1:47-49.
    185) Kuntz WD: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1976; 37:423-426.
    186) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    187) Lamireau T, Rebouissoux L, & Denis D: Accidental caustic ingestion in children: is endoscopy always mandatory?. J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 33:81-84.
    188) Langeland T & Braathen LR: Allergic contact dermatitis from resorcinol. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17:126.
    189) Legathe A, Hoener BA, & Tozer TN: Pharmacokinetic interaction between benzene metabolites, phenol, and hydroquinone, in B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 124:131-138.
    190) Leider M & Moser HS: Toxicology of topical dermatologic preparations. Arch Dermatol 1961; 83:928-929.
    191) Lewin JF & Clearly WT: An accidental death caused by the absorption of phenol through skin. A case report. Forens Sci Internat 1982; 19:177-179.
    192) Lewin L: Gifte und Vergiftungen, Stilke, Berlin, Germany, 1929.
    193) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    194) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1993.
    195) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 1997.
    196) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001.
    197) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2000.
    198) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    199) Liao JTF & Oehme FW: Literature reviews of phenolic compounds. I. Phenol. Vet Human Toxicol 1980; 22:160-164.
    200) Light SE: Convulsive seizures following the application of phenol to the skin. Northwest Med 1931; 30:232-234.
    201) Lin T, Lee S, Lai C, et al: Phenol burn. Burns 2006; 32(4):517-521.
    202) Lindenmann J, Matzi V, Kaufmann P, et al: Hyperbaric oxygenation in the treatment of life-threatening isobutyl nitrite-induced methemoglobinemia--a case report. Inhal Toxicol 2006; 18(13):1047-1049.
    203) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    204) Little AG, Naunheim KS, & Ferguson MK: Surgical management of esophageal strictures. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45:144-147.
    205) Litton C: Chemical face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1962; 29:371-380.
    206) Lo Dico C, Caplan YH, & Levine B: Phenol: tissue distribution in a fatality. J Forens Sci 1989; 34:1013-1015.
    207) LoVecchio F, Hamilton R, & Sturman K: A meta-analysis of the use of steroids in the prevention of stricture formation from second degree caustic burns of the esophagus (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1996; 35:579-580.
    208) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    209) Lucas RC & Lane WA: Two cases of carbolic acid coma induced by application of carbolic acid compresses to the skin. Lancet 1895; 1:1362-1364.
    210) Luedtke SA, Kuhn RJ, & McCaffrey FM: Pharmacologic management of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part 2: Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and junctional and atrial ectopic tachycardia. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31(11):1347-1359.
    211) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    212) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    213) Macek C: Venous thrombosis results from some phenol injections. JAMA 1983; 249:1807.
    214) Malysheva RA: Pediatriya (Moscow) 1976; 11:85-87.
    215) Mancuso G, Reggiani M, & Berdondini RM: Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Derm 1996; 34:17-22.
    216) Mandapati R , Byrum CJ , Kavey RE , et al: Procainamide for rate control of postsurgical junctional tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21(2):123-128.
    217) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    218) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    219) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    220) Marquez A & Todd M: Acute hemolytic anemia and agranulocytosis following intravenous administration of toluidine blue. Am Pract 1959; 10:1548-1550.
    221) Marshall F II: Caustic burns of the esophagus: ten year results of aggressive care. South Med J 1979; 72:1236-1237.
    222) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    223) Meredith JW, Kon ND, & Thompson JN: Management of injuries from liquid lye ingestion. J Trauma 1988; 28:1173-1180.
    224) Mierauskiene J, Lekevicius R, & Lazutka JR: Anticlastogenic effects of aevitum intake in a group of chemical industry workers. Hereditas 1993; 118:201-204.
    225) Millar AJW, Numanoglu A, & Mann M: Detection of caustid oesophageal injury tiwh technetium 99m-labelled sucralfate. J Ped SUrg 2001; 36:262-265.
    226) Miller BM, Pujadas E, & Gocke E: Evaluation of the micronucleus test in vitro using Chinese hamster cells - results of four chemicals weakly positive in the in vivo micronucleus test. Environ Molec Mutagen 1995; 26:240-247.
    227) Minor JL & Becker BA: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1971; 19:373.
    228) Mirabelli MC, Hoppin JA, & Tolbert PE: Occupational exposure to chlorophenol and the risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers among U.S. men aged 30 to 60. Am J Ind Med 2000; 37:532-541.
    229) Moazam F, Talbert JL, & Miller D: Caustic ingestion and its sequelae in children. South Med J 1987; 80:187-188.
    230) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    231) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 12th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1997.
    232) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    233) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    234) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    235) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    236) NIOSH: Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    237) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    238) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    239) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    240) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    241) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    242) Narotsky MG & Kavlock RJ: A multidisciplinary approach to toxicological screening: II. Developmental toxicity. J Toxicol Environ Health 1995; 45:145-171.
    243) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    244) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    245) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    246) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    247) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    248) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    249) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    250) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    251) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    252) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    253) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    254) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    255) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    256) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    257) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    258) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    259) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    260) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    261) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    262) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    263) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    264) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    265) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    266) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    267) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    268) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    269) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    270) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    271) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    272) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    273) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    274) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    275) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    276) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    277) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    278) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    279) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    280) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    281) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    282) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    283) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    284) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    285) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    286) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    287) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    288) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    289) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    290) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    291) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    292) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    293) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    294) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    295) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    296) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    297) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    298) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    299) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    300) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    301) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    302) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    303) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    304) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    305) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    306) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    307) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    308) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    309) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    310) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    311) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    312) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    313) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    314) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    315) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    316) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    317) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    318) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    319) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    320) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    321) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    322) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    323) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    324) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    325) Nemec K: Antidotes in acute poisoning. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract 2011; 17(4):53-55.
    326) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    327) Neundorfer M & Wolpert E: Munch Med Wochensch 1976; 118:1177-1178.
    328) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    329) Nonoto Y, Fujita T, & Kitani Y: Serum and urine levels of phenol following phenol blocks. Canad J Anaesth 1987; 34:307-310.
    330) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    331) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    332) Nuutinen M, Uhari M, & Karvali T: Consequences of caustic ingestions in children. Acta Paediatr 1994; 83:1200-1205.
    333) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    334) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    335) Oakes DD, Sherck JP, & Mark JBD: Lye ingestion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83:194-204.
    336) Paschin YV & Bahitova LM: Mutat Res 1982; 104:389-393.
    337) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    338) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    339) Pegg SP & Campbell DC: Children's burns due to cresol. Burns 1985; 11:294-296.
    340) Pelclova D & Navratil T: Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion?. Toxicol Rev 2005; 24(2):125-129.
    341) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    342) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    343) Pohanish RP: Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 4th ed, Noyes Publications / William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, NY, 2002.
    344) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    345) Previtera C, Giusti F, & Gugliemi M: Predictive value of visible lesions (cheeks, lips, oropharynx) in suspected caustic ingestion: may endoscopy reasonably be omitted in completely negative pediatric patients?. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6:176-178.
    346) Product Information: Cordarone(R) oral tablets, amiodarone HCl oral tablets. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc (per FDA), Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
    347) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    348) Product Information: PROVAYBLUE(TM) intravenous injection, methylene blue intravenous injection. American Regent (per FDA), Shirley, NY, 2016.
    349) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    350) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    351) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    352) Product Information: methylene blue 1% IV injection, methylene blue 1% IV injection. American Regent, Inc (per manufacturer), Shirley, NY, 2011.
    353) Product Information: methylene blue 1% intravenous injection, methylene blue 1% intravenous injection. Akorn, Inc. (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2011.
    354) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    355) Product Information: procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2011.
    356) Pullin TG, Pinkerton MN, & Johnston RV: Decontamination of the skin of swine following phenol exposure: a comparison of the relative efficacy of water versus polyethylene glycol/Industrial Methylated Spirits. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978; 43:199-206.
    357) RTECS: Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2003; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    358) Raffle PAB, Adams PH, & Baxter PJ: Hunter's Diseases of Occupations, Little, Brown & Co, Boston, MA, 1994.
    359) Ratnasamy C, Rossique-Gonzalez M, & Young ML: Pharmacological therapy in children with atrioventricular reentry: which drug?. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):753-761.
    360) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    361) Reyes HM, Lin CY, & Schluhk FF: Experimental treatment of corrosive esophageal burns. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9:317-327.
    362) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    363) Rosenberg N, Kunderman PJ, & Vroman L: Prevention of experimental esophageal stricture by cortisone II. Arch Surg 1953; 66:593-598.
    364) Saedi S, Nyhus LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973a; 39:465-469.
    365) Saedi S, Nyhust LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973; 39:465-469.
    366) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    367) Sakai Y, Abo W, & Yagita K: Chemical burn with systemic cresol intoxication. Ped International 1999; 41:174-176.
    368) Saunders A, Geddes L, & Elliott P: Are phenolic disinfectants toxic to staff members?. Aust Nurses J 1988; 17:25-26.
    369) Saydjari R, Abston S, & Desai MH: Chemical burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1986; 7:404-408.
    370) Schild JA: Caustic ingestion in adult patients. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:1199-1201.
    371) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    372) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    373) Shamy MY, el Gazzar RM, el Sayed MA, et al: Study of some biological changes among workers occupationally exposed to phenol, alone or in combination with other organic solvents.. Ind Health 1994; 32:207-214.
    374) Shepherd G & Keyes DC: Methylene blue. In: Dart,RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. 3rd ed, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp -.
    375) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    376) Soares ER & Tift JP: Phenol poisoning: three fatal cases. J Forens Sci 1982; 27:729-731.
    377) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    378) Spiller HA, Quadranikushner DA, & Cleveland P: A 5-year evaluation of acute exposures to phenol disinfectant (26-percent). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:307-313.
    379) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    380) Stagnone GJ, Orgel MG, & Stagnone JJ: Cardiovascular effects of topical 50% trichloroacetic acid and Baker's phenol solution. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987; 13:999-1002.
    381) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    382) Stanford SC , Stanford BJ , & Gillman PK : Risk of severe serotonin toxicity following co-administration of methylene blue and serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an update on a case report of post-operative delirium. J Psychopharmacol 2010; 24(10):1433-1438.
    383) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    384) Subrahmanyam VV, Kolachana P, & Smith MT: Hydroxylation of phenol to hydroquinone catalyzed by a human myeloperoxidase-superoxide complex: possible implications in benzene-induced myelotoxicity. Free Radic Res Commun 1991; 15:285-296.
    385) Sugawa C & Lucas CE: Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: a clinical and endoscopic study. Surgery 1989; 106:802-807.
    386) Suppiah A & Perry EP: Jaundice as a presentation of phenol induced hepatotoxicity following injection sclerotherapy for haemorrhoids. Surgeon 2005; 3(1):43-44.
    387) Symbas PN, Vlasis SE, & Hatcher CR Jr: Esophagitis secondary to ingestion of caustic material. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36:73-77.
    388) Tanaka T, Kasai K, & Kita T: Distribution of phenol in a fatal poisoning case determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43:1086-1088.
    389) Teunis BS, Leftwich EI, & Pierce LE: Acute methemoglobinemia and hemolytic anemia due to toluidine blue. Arch Surg 1970; 101:527-531.
    390) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    391) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    392) Tosti A, Gaddoni G, & Piraccini BM: Occupational leukoderma due to phenolic compounds in the ceramics industry?. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 25:67-68.
    393) Treem WR, Long WR, & Friedman D: Successful management of an acquired gastric outlet obstruction with endoscopy guided balloon dilatation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1987; 6:992-996.
    394) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    395) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    396) Truppman ES & Ellenby JD: Major electrocardiographic changes during chemical face peeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63:44-48.
    397) Tsuruta Y, Watanabe S, & Inoue H: Fluoremetric determination of phenol and p-cresol in urine by precolumn high-performance liquid chromatography using 4-(N-phthalimidinyl)benzenesulfonyl chloride. Anal Biochem 1996; 243:86-91.
    398) Turtle WRM & Dolan T: A case of rapid and fatal absorption of carbolic acid through the skin. Lancet 1922; 2:1273-1274.
    399) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    400) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    401) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    402) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    403) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    404) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    405) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    406) U.S. Food and Drug Administration: FDA Drug Safety Communication: Serious CNS reactions possible when methylene blue is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring, MD. 2011. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm263190.htm. As accessed 2011-07-26.
    407) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    408) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    409) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    410) Unlu RE, Alagoz MS, Uysal AC, et al: Phenol intoxication in a child. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15(6):1010-1013.
    411) Urben PG: Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 5th ed, 1-2, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, England, 1995.
    412) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    413) Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, et al: Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    414) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    415) Vergauwen p, Moulin D, & Buts JP: Caustic burns of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150:700-703.
    416) Vincenzi C, Guerra L, & Peluso AM: Allergic contact dermatitis due to phenol-formaldehyde resins in a knee guard. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 27:54.
    417) Wahl M, Lipscomb J, & McAllister K: Phenol burn decontaminated with golytely (abstract). J Tox Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:494-495.
    418) Walsh EP , Saul JP , Sholler GF , et al: Evaluation of a staged treatment protocol for rapid automatic junctional tachycardia after operation for congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(5):1046-1053.
    419) Warner MA & Harper JV: Cardiac dysrhythmias associated with chemical peeling with phenol. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:366-367.
    420) Watson ID, McBride D, & Paterson KR: Fatal xylenol self-poisoning. Postgrad Med J 1986; 62:411-412.
    421) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    422) Wijburg FA, Beukers MM, & Heymans HS: Nasogastric intubation as sole treatment of caustic esophageal lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:337-341.
    423) Wijburg FA, Heymans HS, & Urbanus NA: Caustic esophageal lesions in childhood: prevention of stricture formation. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24(2):171-173.
    424) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    425) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    426) Winek CL, Collom WD, & Martineau P: Toluidine blue intoxication. Clin Toxicol 1969; 2:1-3.
    427) Wong O & Harris F: Retrospective cohort mortality study and nested case-control study of workers exposed to creosote at 11 wood-treating plants in the United States. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47:683-697.
    428) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    429) Wu MH & Lai WW: Surgical management of extensive corrosive injuries of the alimentary tract. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 1993; 177:12-16.
    430) Wu ML, Tsai WJ, & Yang CC: Concentrated cresol intoxication. Vet Human Toxicol 1998; 40:341-343.
    431) Yager JW, Eastmond DA, & Robertson ML: Characterization of micronuclei induced in human lymphocytes by benzene metabolites. Cancer Res 1990; 50:393-399.
    432) Yanysheva NY, Balenko NV, & Chernichenko IA: Modifying effect of nitrogen oxides, phenol and orthocresol on benz(a)pyrene induced carcinogenesis in rats and mice. Eksp Onkol 1992; 14:14-19.
    433) Yarington CT & Heatly CA: Steroids, antibiotics, and early esophagoscopy in caustic esophageal trauma. N Y State J Med 1963; 63:2960-2963.
    434) Yashiki M, Kojima T, & Miyazaki T: Gas chromatographic determination of cresols in the biological fluids of a non-fatal case of cresol intoxication. Forens Sci Internat 1990; 47:21-29.
    435) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Mehta S: The role of fiberoptic endoscopy in the management of corrosive ingestion and modified endoscopic classification of burns. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:165-169.
    436) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Nagi B: Ingestion of corrosive acids: spectrum of injury to upper gastrointestinal tract and natural history. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:702-707.
    437) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    438) do Nascimento TS, Pereira RO, de Mello HL, et al: Methemoglobinemia: from diagnosis to treatment. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2008; 58(6):651-664.