MOBILE VIEW  | 

PHENCYCLIDINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Phencyclidine is a potent analgesic and anesthetic. It is no longer prescribed for humans due to its severe adverse effects, but still has veterinary uses. It is a hallucinogenic and drug of abuse. Prevalence of abuse is highly regionalized.

Specific Substances

    1) PCP
    2) 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)piperidine
    3) Phenylcyclohexylpiperidine
    4) CI-395
    5) Angel dust
    6) Mist
    7) Hog
    8) Peace pill
    9) Kay Jay
    10) KJ
    11) Crystal Joint
    12) Elephant Tranquilizer
    13) Super Grass
    14) Super Weed
    15) Rocket fuel
    16) Scuffle
    17) Sheets
    18) Space Basing: PCP + Cocaine (Crack)
    19) Surfer
    20) T
    21) D.O.A.
    22) Cyclones
    23) Snorts
    24) Soma
    25) Goon
    26) Horse franks
    27) Green (PCP-impregnated parsley)
    28) Dust
    29) CAS 77-10-1
    30) CAS 956-90-1 (hydrochloride)
    31) SHERMS (TOBACCO LACED WITH PCP)
    32) SPACE BASING (PCP + CRACK COCAINE)
    33) 2-methoxydiphenidine
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C17-H25-N

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Phencyclidine (PCP, Sernylan(R)), a general anesthetic in veterinary medicine, was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in 1978. Although structurally similar to the anesthetic ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar(R)) phencyclidine is not indicated for human use because of its potent psychomimetic properties. It has also been found in a variety of illicitly manufactured hallucinogens alleged to be tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), lysergic acid (LSD), psilocybin and mescaline (HSDB , 2002).
    2) PHP (phenylcyclohexylpyrrolidine) is an analogue of PCP with the same effects. Other PCP analogues include cyclohexamine (PCE), phenylcyclopentylpiperidine (PCPP) and thienylcyclo hexylpiperidine (TCP) (Budd, 1980).
    3) The percentage of phencyclidine found on the illicit market varies greatly. Most have been reported to contain phencyclidine hydrochloride although the free base has also been seen. The percentage of phencyclidine found in street formulations on the west coast was reported in 1976 : Crystal (50% to 100%); Angel dust (88% to 100%); Other names (10% to 30%); Tablet forms (most 5 mg; range from 1 to 6 mg); Joints of leaf mixtures (0.24% to 7.9%; 1 mg PCP/150 mg leaves; Joints range from 100 to 400 mg total weight) (Burns & Lerner, 1976).
    4) "Clickers" or "Primos" are marijuana cigarettes in which PCP has been soaked into the leaves as an aqueous solution or in dilute formaldehyde (Garey et al, 1987).
    5) SPACE BASING: Combined smoking of cocaine (crack) and phencyclidine (Giannini et al, 1987).
    6) 2-METHOXYDIPHENIDINE
    a) 2-Metoxydiphenidine, also known as MXP (or 2-MXP), has been available since 2013 as a research chemical and a purported alternative to the dissociative anesthetics methoxetamine and ketamine. The use of dissociative anesthetics has occurred since the development of PCP. In two fatalities, the cause of death was due 2-methoxydiphenidine based on laboratory confirmation (Elliott et al, 2015).
    7) 3-METHOXY-PHENCYCLIDINE AND 4-METHOXY-PHENCYCLIDINE
    a) In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).
    8) ADULTERANTS
    a) Illicit phencyclidine is rarely available as the pure crystalline substance. Liquid products contain solvents used in the manufacturing process, such as benzene, toluene, cyclohexanol, isopropanol, phenol, and ether (Tschirgi, 1990; Shesser et al, 1991).
    b) A common contaminant is PCC, an intermediate in synthesis that releases hydrogen cyanide when smoked or heated; amounts range from 10 to 70%. At the usual recreational doses of 2.5 to 6 mg, acute cyanide toxicity is unlikely (Tschirgi, 1990), however nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, cyanosis, and coma have been attributed to PCC (Soine et al, 1979).
    c) Other pharmacologically active adulterants include phenylpropanolamine, benzocaine, procaine, ephedrine, caffeine, ketamine, and piperidine (precursor) (Shesser et al, 1991).
    B) USES
    1) INTENTIONAL MISUSE: Powdered PCP has been mixed with an organic solvent or embalming fluid. Tobacco or marijuana cigarettes are dipped in the fluid and then smoked. Alternatively, marijuana, soaked in the liquid PCP preparation, is made into a cigarette or the PCP laced marijuana is put into a hollowed out cigar for smoking. The cigarette/cigar is smoked dry or still wet for slower burning and perceived enhanced effect. Street names for this form of drug abuse have included: "getting wet", "fry house", and "dipping" (Morocco & Osterhoudt, 2003).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Phencyclidine (PCP, 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)-piperidine) is a dissociative anesthetic, and is abused for its hallucinogenic properties. It is related to ketamine, which is widely used as a sedation medication, but ketamine is much less potent than phencyclidine.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Phencyclidine is thought to stimulate alpha-adrenergic receptors, potentiating the effects and/or inhibition of reuptake of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and serotonin. It is also thought to stimulate opioid receptors and inhibit NMDA receptors. In overdose, acute psychosis and sympathomimetic toxidrome can produce agitated delirium. In large overdoses, patients may progress to coma.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure to phencyclidine is uncommon. Severe toxicity is rare. Deaths have been reported but are most often due to trauma rather than to direct drug effects.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Mild toxicity results in tachycardia, hypertension, hallucinations, euphoria, and disinhibition. Phencyclidine can also cause mild agitation and acute changes in mood. Nystagmus is often prominent on physical exam.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Severe toxicity can cause psychosis, severe psychomotor agitation and hyperthermia. Rhabdomyolysis, multisystem organ failure, and metabolic acidosis can result from the hyperstimulation. Seizures, followed by coma and death are ultimate CNS outcomes in severe toxicity.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) PCP crosses the placenta and may result in neonatal irritability, jitteriness, coarse tremors, nystagmus, and poor feeding.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Evaluate patient carefully for evidence of trauma.
    C) In symptomatic patients, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, liver enzymes, CK, and coagulation studies to investigate for complications from prolonged agitation and hyperthermia.
    D) Specific PCP concentrations are not readily available and not useful in managing acute intoxication. They also do not correlate well with level of intoxication/symptoms. Some urine drug screens include PCP as part of their screening, but many do not and false positive results are not uncommon.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment for mild to moderate toxicity includes minimizing external stimulus, and the use of benzodiazepines for agitation. Antipsychotics may be considered in cases of acute psychosis.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) For severe toxicity, including hyperthermia and psychomotor agitation, high-dose benzodiazepines may be required. If symptoms do not improve, sedation, paralysis and intubation may be indicated. For hyperthermia, control agitation and enhance evaporative heat loss by keeping the skin moist and using fans. Ice water immersion can be used in severe cases. Benzodiazepines can be used for seizures; add barbiturates or propofol if seizures persist. Aggressive fluid resuscitation and supportive care should be used in cases of metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and multisystem organ failure.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Prehospital charcoal is typically not recommended in PCP ingestion because of the risk of abrupt changes in mental status.
    2) HOSPITAL: Gastric lavage is not indicated for PCP ingestion. Activated charcoal can be offered, but should be given to cooperative, awake alert patients. It should be used with caution as mental status can deteriorate. Overall it is not likely to affect the course of PCP intoxication
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Definite airway management may be needed if CNS depression develops. It may also be needed if large doses of sedatives are needed to decrease the sympathomimetic stimulation.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) Dialysis or other methods of enhance elimination are not recommended. Urinary acidification will increase the excretion of PCP but the risk of systemic acidosis exceeds the potential benefit and it is not recommended. Continuous nasogastric suction has also been advocated but may increase the risk of aspiration or injury in a patient with altered mental status, so it should not be used.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Adults who are asymptomatic after a low dose ingestion can be watched at home provided a sober adult can monitor them.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Any symptomatic patient, and a patient with a self-harm ingestion, and any exposed child should be sent to an emergency department for evaluation, treatment and monitoring.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with severe or prolonged symptoms, or requiring medication treatment should be admitted for further care.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any large and/or severely symptomatic exposures. Child protective services should be involved for exposed children. Consider referral for substance abuse counselling as appropriate.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Not aggressively treating psychomotor agitation and hyperthermia. Placing patient in physical restraints for psychomotor agitation without proper sedation. Not investigating other etiologies of altered mental status (such as traumatic head injury or meningitis).
    I) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Absorption is fast via the typical routes of administration: insufflation or ingestion. It is primarily metabolized by the liver via oxidative hydroxylation, after hepatic metabolism, it is excreted by the kidneys. Half-life is about an hours after small doses but can be very prolonged after large doses (7 hours to more than 50 hours).
    J) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Other arylcyclohexylamines (eg, ketamine), analogs of PCP, other stimulants (eg, amphetamines/methamphetamines), cocaine, MDMA, hallucinogenics such as LSD, peyote, and anticholinergic agents (eg, Jimson weed)

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Symptoms are expected at doses of approximately 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg. A dose of 1 to 5 mg will normally result in euphoria and numbness, resembling ethanol intoxication. Doses of 5 to 10 mg often result in excitation, confusion, ataxia, and dysarthria. Prolonged coma, seizures, and death may result from 20 mg or more. Fatalities are more often related to trauma than to direct drug effects.
    B) Blood levels of 20 to 30 ng/mL may cause excitation and catatonia; 30 to 100 ng/mL may cause coma and myoclonus; above 100 ng/mL may cause seizures and hypotension.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Phencyclidine (PCP, 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)-piperidine) is a dissociative anesthetic, and is abused for its hallucinogenic properties. It is related to ketamine, which is widely used as a sedation medication, but ketamine is much less potent than phencyclidine.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Phencyclidine is thought to stimulate alpha-adrenergic receptors, potentiating the effects and/or inhibition of reuptake of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and serotonin. It is also thought to stimulate opioid receptors and inhibit NMDA receptors. In overdose, acute psychosis and sympathomimetic toxidrome can produce agitated delirium. In large overdoses, patients may progress to coma.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure to phencyclidine is uncommon. Severe toxicity is rare. Deaths have been reported but are most often due to trauma rather than to direct drug effects.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Mild toxicity results in tachycardia, hypertension, hallucinations, euphoria, and disinhibition. Phencyclidine can also cause mild agitation and acute changes in mood. Nystagmus is often prominent on physical exam.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Severe toxicity can cause psychosis, severe psychomotor agitation and hyperthermia. Rhabdomyolysis, multisystem organ failure, and metabolic acidosis can result from the hyperstimulation. Seizures, followed by coma and death are ultimate CNS outcomes in severe toxicity.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) HYPERTHERMIA and hypothermia are uncommon (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    1) Fever (39.5 degrees C) was reported in a 42-year-old woman following PCP intoxication (Stein et al, 2005).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) SUMMARY: Horizontal nystagmus is often an initial finding (incidence 57.4%). With increasing severity of intoxication vertical nystagmus, loss of lid and corneal reflexes (often observed as an open-eyed blank stare), then roving "Groucho" eyes with dilated pupils, and finally fixed, dilated pupils occur. Miosis is common in children.
    2) NYSTAGMUS: Present on admission in 57.4%; in mild intoxication appears in response to stimulation and is horizontal. With increasing severity, spontaneous vertical and/or rotary nystagmus occurs. Patients may have 2 or 3 types simultaneously (McCarron et al, 1981b; Stein et al, 2005; Rappolt & Gay, 1979; Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    3) MYDRIASIS occurs with more severe intoxication (incidence 6.2%); initially accompanied by loss of lid and corneal reflexes (often observed as an open-eyed blank stare; incidence 11.7%) and roving "Groucho" eyes, progressing to fixed, dilated pupils in deep intoxication (Stein et al, 2005; Rappolt & Gay, 1979; McCarron et al, 1981b).
    4) MIOSIS is uncommon in adults (incidence 2.1%), but reported in 7 of 33 pediatric exposures (accidental ingestion or passive inhalation) (McCarron et al, 1981b; Karp et al, 1980), and in an adult case involving ingestion of a plastic bag which was believed to contain phencyclidine (Young & Crapo, 1992).
    5) UNCOMMON EFFECTS: Lacrimation, conjunctival hyperemia, and ptosis have been reported (McCarron et al, 1984; (Reynolds, 1982; Fisher & McDonald, 1984).
    6) 3-Me-PCP and 4-Me-PCP: In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) SALIVA INCREASED
    a) Hypersalivation was reported in 1.7% of cases (McCarron et al, 1981b).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: Hypertension is common (Young & Crapo, 1992), occurring in 57% in one large series (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) ONSET: Generally present on admission, but can be delayed. May follow periods of agitation. Delayed hypertensive crisis several days after exposure is usually related to complications, such as seizures, intracerebral hemorrhage, or hemodynamic changes during dialysis (Eastman & Cohen, 1975; McCarron et al, 1981b).
    c) DURATION: Resolves within 4 hours in 62%; remains elevated for 5 to 12 hours in 19%, for 13 to 24 hours in 8%, and more than 24 hours in 11% (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    d) FINDINGS: Isolated systolic hypertension occurs in 25%. Diastolic pressures over 110 mmHg were only found in 3.3% of hypertensive cases; patients with underlying essential hypertension are at higher risk for significant elevations. Usually resolves spontaneously without treatment (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    e) 3-Me-PCP and 4-Me-PCP: In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Mild tachycardia, up to 140 beats/minute, was found in 30% of cases in one large series (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) 3-Me-PCP and 4-Me-PCP: In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) APNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Apnea occurs in about 2.8% of cases, often preceding or following a grand mal seizure. Respiratory arrest occurs in about 10% of apneic patients (McCarron et al, 1981b). Mechanical ventilation is rarely required for several hours or days (Aronow & Done, 1978).
    B) STRIDOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Stridor may be noted during severe muscle contractions and seizures (Aronow & Done, 1978).
    C) BRONCHOSPASM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) RARE EFFECTS: Tachypnea (4%), bronchospasm after smoking or sniffing (2.1%), and bronchorrhea (0.6%) have been reported (McCarron et al, 1981b).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) COMMON FINDINGS: Acute brain syndrome (disorientation, confusion, lack of judgment, inappropriate affect, recent memory loss) is the most common pattern (incidence 37%). Behavior is often violent, agitated, bizarre, or delusional; may display catalepsy or posturing.
    b) UNCOMMON FINDINGS: Coma (11%), lethargy (7%), generalized rigidity (5%), generalized seizures (3% in adults, up to 21% in children), localized dystonias (2%), dyskinesias (2%), athetosis (1%), and nudism (3%) may occur.
    c) ONSET: Typically, acute brain syndrome develops suddenly, followed sometimes by coma; coma can also occur abruptly. Symptoms tend to wax and wane, alternating between lethargic and excited states.
    d) DURATION: Coma has lasted for less than 30 minutes to 7 days. Acute brain syndrome, catatonia, and toxic psychosis may appear on emergence from coma and last several hours to several days or months (for psychosis).
    e) 3-Me-PCP and 4-Me-PCP: In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).
    B) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: 36.9% (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) FINDINGS: The most common pattern of toxicity. Characterized by disorientation, confusion, lack of judgment, inappropriate or labile affect, recent memory loss, and anxiety; often with slurred speech and ataxia. Frequently leads to traumatic injury (McCarron et al, 1981a).
    c) ONSET: May occur initially or on emergence from coma (McCarron et al, 1981a).
    d) DURATION: Often lasts only a few hours, but can remain symptomatic for up to 21 days (McCarron et al, 1981a).
    e) In a series of 59 patients presenting to the ED after using illy (active component PCP) 25% were oriented and conversed normally, 39% were oriented and conversed but were slow to respond, 24% were disoriented and used inappropriate words, 10% were unresponsive and one presented in cardiac arrest (D'Onofrio et al, 2006). Of these same patients 47% were cooperative, 28% were combative, and 17% were irritable. Physical restraints were used in 90% and chemical restraints in 21% due to risk of harm because of altered mental status.
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: 10.6% (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) FINDINGS: Coma has been classified as mild, moderate, or severe, based on duration (McCarron et al, 1981a):
    1) MILD: Usually lasts for 30 minutes or less, up to 2 hours; not associated with apnea unless multiple ingestion. Accounts for 43% of comas.
    2) MODERATE: Lasts 2 to 24 hours; associated with more vital sign and autonomic disturbances. Accounts for 38% of comas.
    3) SEVERE: Lasts more than 24 hours (up to 146 hours); associated with higher incidence of aspiration pneumonia and rhabdomyolysis.
    c) Prolonged coma (24 days) was reported in a 29-year-old man with prolonged intestinal absorption secondary to swallowing a plastic bag containing phencyclidine (Young & Crapo, 1992).
    D) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures occur in 3.1% overall; 15% in comatose patients. Physical findings suggesting grand mal seizures without epileptiform activity by EEG has been reported (Young & Crapo, 1992). Status epilepticus is uncommon (McCarron et al, 1981b; Jackson, 1989)
    E) DYSTONIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: Generalized dystonia occurs in about 5%; localized dystonia in 2.4% (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) FINDINGS: Generalized dystonia is associated with rigidity of all extremities or body stiffness, jerky/thrashing movements, coarse tremor, or twitching. Localized dystonia may manifest as trismus, oculogyric crisis, torticollis, tongue spasm, opisthotonos, or rigidity of one or more extremities (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    F) DYSKINESIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dyskinesia may occur alone or in combination with dystonia. Signs include facial grimacing, circumoral muscle twitching, lip smacking, or chewing movements. Occurs in about 1.7% and is usually very transient (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    G) INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Although extremely rare, massive fatal intracranial hemorrhage (possibly due to the acute hypertensive effect of PCP) in the absence of trauma has been reported in one patient (Bessen, 1982). Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema occurred at the time of the bleed.
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ENCEPHALOPATHY
    a) In a rat model, 10 mg to 50 mg PCP was toxic to Purkinje cells in the rodent cerebellum (Nakki et al, 1995).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vomiting may occur (Reynolds, 1982).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis (incidence 2.2%), myoglobinuria, acute uric acid nephropathy and associated acute renal failure have been reported following PCP intoxication (Barton et al, 1980; Patel et al, 1979; Cogen et al, 1978; Patel et al, 1980; Patel, 1982).
    b) CASE REPORT: Acute renal failure (serum creatinine 4.06 mg/dL}, severe hyperkalemia (9.35 mEq/L), and rhabdomyolysis (creatine phosphokinase level greater than 5,000 units/L) was reported in a 42-year-old woman who had prolonged coma following PCP and ethanol intoxication. Despite aggressive supportive care, the patient continued to deteriorate clinically and subsequently died, due to multi-organ failure, approximately 3 days post-admission (Stein et al, 2005).
    B) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Urinary retention has been reported rarely (McCarron et al, 1981b).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild metabolic acidosis may occur (Young & Crapo, 1992).
    b) CASE REPORT: Severe metabolic and respiratory acidosis (pH 6.94; HCO3 10.6 mEq/L; pCO2 76.2 mmHg; pO2 76.8 mmHg; base excess 18.9 mEq/L) were reported in a 42-year-old woman who developed rhabdomyolysis, and multi system organ failure after prolonged coma from PCP and ethanol (Stein et al, 2005).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COAG./BLEEDING TESTS ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: The INR was elevated (2.9 {normal 0.9 to 1.3}) and the clotting factor V levels were 4% (normal 50% to 150%) in a 42-year-old woman who developed multi system organ failure following prolonged coma from PCP and ethanol intoxication (Stein et al, 2005).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Diaphoresis is uncommon (McCarron et al, 1981b).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INCREASED MUSCLE TONE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperreflexia, increased muscle tone, and excessive strength have been reported (Aronow et al, 1980; Morgan & Solomon, 1978).
    B) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis may develop in patients with prolonged agitation, coma, or seizures (Young & Crapo, 1992).
    b) CASE REPORT: Rhabdomyolysis (CPK greater than 5,000 units/L) with associated compartment syndrome of the right arm, necessitating fasciotomy, was reported in a 42-year-old woman who had prolonged coma following PCP and ethanol intoxication (Stein et al, 2005).
    c) 3-Me-PCP and 4-Me-PCP: In a Swedish (STRIDA project) observational study of patients (n=1243) with exposure to new psychoactive substances (NPS), positive tests for 3-methoxy-phencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP), for 4-methoxy-phencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP), and for both agents were observed in 56, 11, and 8 patients, respectively. Poly-drug use was reported in 52 patients and only 7 patients had exposure to a single agent, 3-MeO-PCP. In the single-substance exposure group, the following clinical effects were reported: hypertension (systolic BP 140 mmHg or higher; n=7), tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or higher; n=5), altered mental status (eg, confusion, disorientation, dissociation, hallucinations; n=4), agitation (n=2), nystagmus (n=2), renal deficiency (n=2), mitotic pupils (n=2), pupils with slow or no response to light (n=1), rhabdomyolysis (n=1), and diaphoresis (n=1). Patients with poly-susbtance exposure developed similar adverse effects, but also had more sympathomimetic effects (eg, agitation [38%], dilated pupils [33%])(Backberg et al, 2015).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypoglycemia frequently reported (incidence 22%) (McCarron et al, 1981b).
    b) Persistent hypoglycemia (17 mg/dL) was reported in a 42-year-old woman who developed multi organ system failure after prolonged coma following PCP and ethanol intoxication (Stein et al, 2005).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) PCP crosses the placenta and may result in neonatal irritability, jitteriness, coarse tremors, nystagmus, and poor feeding.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) PCP crosses the placenta. Neonatal irritability, jitteriness, coarse tremors (incidence 95%), nystagmus, poor feeding, poor attention, hypertonia (incidence 62%), depressed neonatal reflexes, abnormal attachment behavior (incidence 17%), continuous crying, and possibly anatomic abnormalities may occur (Golden et al, 1982; Ahmad, 1987; Wachsman et al, 1989; Tabor et al, 1990; Briggs et al, 1998).
    a) Newborns with PCP-positive cord levels did not differ from newborns with PCP-negative cord levels in neonatal weight, Apgar scores, and neonatal complications (Lipton, 1983; Strauss et al, 1981).
    b) A majority of newborns with PCP positive cord levels were of mothers with PCP negative maternal blood samples and this could indicate maternal exposure weeks before delivery (Lipton, 1983) Kaufman, 1983).
    B) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    PHENCYCLIDINEX
    Reference: Briggs et al, 1998
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Phencyclidine appears in human milk, and animal studies suggest that it may be concentrated in milk (Nicholas, 1982).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS77-10-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Evaluate patient carefully for evidence of trauma.
    C) In symptomatic patients, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, liver enzymes, CK, and coagulation studies to investigate for complications from prolonged agitation and hyperthermia.
    D) Specific PCP concentrations are not readily available and not useful in managing acute intoxication. They also do not correlate well with level of intoxication/symptoms. Some urine drug screens include PCP as part of their screening, but many do not and false positive results are not uncommon.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor blood gases.
    B) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) In symptomatic patients, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, liver enzymes, CK, and coagulation studies to investigate for complications from prolonged agitation and hyperthermia.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) SPECIFIC AGENT
    1) Urinary excretion of PCP is pH dependent. Urine PCP level may be undetectable in patients with alkaline urine. A urine pH should always be obtained along with the urine PCP level.
    2) NIDA guidelines stipulate a cutoff for PCP in urine of 25 ng/mL.
    B) ASSAY INTERFERENCE
    1) False positives on urine screening tests may occur, with potentially adverse medico-legal consequences. One case report attributes a false positive urine PCP screen to dextromethorphan (Rogowski & Krenzelok, 1997).
    2) In a retrospective study, the frequency of false-positive urine screens for PCP was evaluated. During a 4-year period, 491 (1.4%) of 33,972 urine drug screens were positive for PCP; 391 cases were confirmed positive for PCP by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 88 failed to confirm. False-positive urine screens for PCP were significantly associated with the use of tramadol, dextromethorphan, alprazolam, clonazepam, and carvedilol. Although diphenhydramine was frequently associated with false-positive screens for PCP, it did not reach statistical significance (Rengarajan & Mullins, 2013).
    3) In one study, 24 (45%) of 53 positive PCP urine drug immunoassays were confirmed to be true positives. Interfering substances were found in only 6 (21%; dextromethorphan [n=3], tramadol [n=2], diphenhydramine and dextromethorphan combination [n=1]) of the false positive samples (Castelli et al, 2015).
    4) DEXTROMETHORPHAN: One study reported false positive phencyclidine test results with HPLC-based urine drug screens following dextromethorphan intoxication (Budai & Iskandar, 2002). False positive phencyclidine results have also been reported with immune-based assays. GC/MS does not yield false positive results for PCP.
    5) KETAMINE: A urine tox screen was falsely positive for phencyclidine (PCP) several days after intramuscular administration of ketamine. Confirmatory analysis via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) came back negative for PCP, but this laboratory method did identify ketamine metabolites (Shannon, 1998). Ketamine and phencyclidine, structurally-related chemicals, and their metabolites can be excreted in the urine for several days which may have been the reason that the patient's urine tox screen came back positive. The authors recommend that a positive drug screen should be confirmed with a GC-MS analysis.
    6) LAMOTRIGINE: In 2 case reports, lamotrigine produced false positive results for phencyclidine (PCP) on Bio-Rad Tox rapid urine tests (Geraci et al, 2010).
    7) TRAMADOL: Tramadol and its metabolites can produce a false-positive Emit II Plus phencyclidine (PCP) test result. In 2 cases (an adult and child) of tramadol overdose, both developed a false-positive result for phencyclidine using the Emit II Plus Drugs-of-Abuse Assay. Follow-up with a comprehensive gas chromatography/mass spectrometry qualitative urine drug screen demonstrated a large peak of tramadol in both cases (King et al, 2013).
    8) VENLAFAXINE: Venlafaxine in high concentrations may give false positive results for phencyclidine on the Abbot AxSYM fluorescent polarized immunoassay (Bond et al, 2001). False positive results for phencyclidine have also been reported for the Alpha Laboratories INSTANT-VIEW Multi-Drug Screen Urine Test. These findings occurred with therapeutic dosing of venlafaxine (Santos et al, 2007).
    C) OTHER
    1) The urine should be frequently monitored for the presence of myoglobin which will indicate a patient that is at risk of developing myoglobinuric renal failure.

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) In one study, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS) were used to detect phencyclidine in urine samples using the CEDIA immunoassay (sensitivity 25 ng/mL) (D'Onofrio et al, 2006).
    2) Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) is not sufficiently sensitive to detect clinically relevant PCP levels, even in acidified specimens (Fallis et al, 1982).
    3) Gas chromatography with a nitrogen detector (GC-N2) is able to detect levels of PCP nondetectable by GC-FID. It has been reported that the rate of false negative test for PCP using GC-FID (with GC-N2 as a reference) is more than 80% (Fallis et al, 1982).
    B) IMMUNOASSAY
    1) Three Emit(R) homogeneous enzyme immunoassays are available for the measurement of phencyclidine: semiquantitative and qualitative urine assays with detection limits (sensitivities) of 150 ng/mL for PCP, and a qualitative assay for serum or plasma that detects as little as 50 ng/mL of PCP.
    a) According to CDC proficiency testing and clinical studies, this method shows excellent correlation with GC, HPLC, RIA, and TLC.
    b) Elsohly & Stanford (1990) have developed a protocol for running Syva Emit(R) d.a.u.(TM) phencyclidine assay with a 25 ng/mL cutoff on the Syva ETS(R) analyzer.
    2) RADIOIMMUNOASSAY - There are radioimmunoassay reagents commercially available that can detect PCP in human hair at a sensitivity of 0.1 ng/10 mg hair (Baumgartner et al, 1981; Sramek et al, 1985).
    a) Adulteration with bleach produced false negative results in urine testing with a commercial RIA kit (Bronner et al, 1990).
    C) OTHER
    1) HAIR: Methods for detecting phencyclidine in hair have been described (DuPont & Baumgarter, 1995).
    2) Major laboratories can perform specific PCP levels and identify active metabolites as well. Gastric levels are usually 50 times plasma levels. Phencyclidine analogs, such as PCE, cross react variably with screening assays and may not be routinely detected (Baldridge & Bessen, 1990).
    D) ASSAY INTERFERENCE
    1) TRAMADOL INTERFERENCE: Tramadol and its metabolites can produce a false-positive Emit II Plus phencyclidine (PCP) test result. In 2 cases (an adult and child) of tramadol overdose, both developed a false-positive result for phencyclidine using the Emit II Plus Drugs-of-Abuse Assay. Follow-up with a comprehensive gas chromatography/mass spectrometry qualitative urine drug screen demonstrated a large peak of tramadol in both cases (King et al, 2013).
    2) KETAMINE: In a blinded study of patients receiving parenteral ketamine, five point of care urine immunoassays were assessed for the ability of ketamine and metabolites to produce false positive results for PCP. The immunoassays included devices produced by Forefront Diagnostics, Princeton BioMeditech, Roche Diagnostic Systems, American BioMedica, and Technical Chemicals and Products. No urine tested positive for PCP using these assays, although several post-ketamine urine samples appeared to give a weak partial reaction and careful inspection was required to determine a negative result (Hoffman et al, 2001).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with severe or prolonged symptoms, or requiring medication treatment should be admitted for further care.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Adults who are asymptomatic after a low dose ingestion can be watched at home provided a sober adult can monitor them.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a medical toxicologist or poison center for any large and/or severely symptomatic exposures. Child protective services should be involved for exposed children. Consider referral for substance abuse counselling as appropriate.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any symptomatic patient, and a patient with a self-harm ingestion, and any exposed child should be sent to an emergency department for evaluation, treatment and monitoring.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    B) Evaluate patient carefully for evidence of trauma.
    C) In symptomatic patients, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, liver enzymes, CK, and coagulation studies to investigate for complications from prolonged agitation and hyperthermia.
    D) Specific PCP concentrations are not readily available and not useful in managing acute intoxication. They also do not correlate well with level of intoxication/symptoms. Some urine drug screens include PCP as part of their screening, but many do not and false positive results are not uncommon.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital charcoal is typically not recommended in PCP ingestion because of the risk of abrupt changes in mental status.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Gastric lavage is not indicated for PCP ingestion. Activated charcoal can be offered, but should be given to cooperative, awake alert patients. It should be used with caution as mental status can deteriorate. Overall, it is not likely to affect the course of PCP intoxication.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    3) Although no data exist regarding the efficacy of multiple dose charcoal in humans, PCP undergoes enterohepatic and gastroenteric recycling and would theoretically be a candidate for enhanced elimination (Aronow et al, 1980; Picchioni & Consroe, 1979). PCP was adsorbed to single doses of activated charcoal in animals (Picchioni & Consroe, 1979). Routine administration is not recommended because of the risk of aspiration in patients with significant toxicity..
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    2) Evaluate patient carefully for evidence of trauma.
    3) In symptomatic patients, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, liver enzymes, CK, and coagulation studies to investigate for complications from prolonged agitation and hyperthermia.
    4) Specific PCP concentrations are not readily available and not useful in the acute intoxication. They also do not correlate well with level of intoxication/symptoms. Some urine drug screens include PCP as part of their screening, but many do not and false positive results are not uncommon.
    B) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    7) PHENYTOIN/FOSPHENYTOIN
    a) Benzodiazepines and/or barbiturates are preferred to phenytoin or fosphenytoin in the treatment of drug or withdrawal induced seizures (Wallace, 2005).
    b) PHENYTOIN
    1) PHENYTOIN INTRAVENOUS PUSH VERSUS INTRAVENOUS INFUSION
    a) Administer phenytoin undiluted, by very slow intravenous push or dilute 50 mg/mL solution in 50 to 100 mL of 0.9% saline.
    b) ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 20 mg/kg IV; may administer an additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose 10 minutes after loading dose. Rate of administration should not exceed 50 mg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 20 mg/kg, at a rate not exceeding 1 to 3 mg/kg/min or 50 mg/min, whichever is slower (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Prod Info Dilantin(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2013).
    d) CAUTIONS: Administer phenytoin while monitoring ECG. Stop or slow infusion if dysrhythmias or hypotension occur. Be careful not to extravasate. Follow each injection with injection of sterile saline through the same needle (Prod Info Dilantin(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2013).
    e) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over next 12 to 24 hours for maintenance of therapeutic concentrations. Therapeutic concentrations of 10 to 20 mcg/mL have been reported (Prod Info Dilantin(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2013).
    c) FOSPHENYTOIN
    1) ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 20 mg phenytoin equivalent/kg IV, at a rate not exceeding 150 mg phenytoin equivalent/minute; may give additional dose of 5 mg/kg 10 minutes after the loading infusion (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) CHILD DOSE: 20 mg phenytoin equivalent/kg IV, at a rate of 3 mg phenytoin equivalent/kg/minute, up to a maximum of 150 mg phenytoin equivalent/minute (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) CAUTIONS: Perform continuous monitoring of ECG, respiratory function, and blood pressure throughout the period where maximal serum phenytoin concentrations occur (about 10 to 20 minutes after the end of fosphenytoin infusion) (Prod Info CEREBYX(R) intravenous injection, 2014).
    4) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum phenytoin concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours; therapeutic levels 10 to 20 mcg/mL. Do not obtain serum phenytoin concentrations until at least 2 hours after infusion is complete to allow for conversion of fosphenytoin to phenytoin (Prod Info CEREBYX(R) intravenous injection, 2014).
    8) In a dog model of severe phencyclidine toxicity, the combination of phenytoin (25 milligrams/kilogram iv) and ventilatory support increased the lethal dose of phencyclidine, reduced seizures, acidosis, hyperthermia, arrhythmias, and cardiac output (Davis et al, 1991).
    9) RECURRING SEIZURES
    a) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents:
    1) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    2) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
    b) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised.
    c) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003).
    C) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Definite airway management may be needed if CNS depression develops. It may also be needed if large doses of sedatives are needed to decrease the sympathomimetic stimulation.
    2) ANIMAL STUDY: In a dog model of severe phencyclidine toxicity, ventilatory support increased the lethal dose of phencyclidine, reduced acidosis and improved oxygenation without affecting dysrhythmias (Davis et al, 1991). Pancuronium plus ventilatory support increased the lethal dose of phencyclidine, prevented seizures and acidosis but did not affect dysrhythmias.
    D) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) Patients presenting soon after exposure with agitation should be kept well hydrated with intravenous fluids.
    2) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    3) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    4) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    5) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    6) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).
    E) PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION
    1) Minimize noise, light and touch. Significant reduction of psychotomimetic effects from bad trips can be achieved by providing a quiet and non-threatening environment. Protect the agitated and excited patient from self-inflicted injuries.
    2) NOTE: It may be difficult to tell PCP psychosis from non-PCP psychosis. It is best to do as little intervention as possible until the patient's diagnosis is clarified.
    3) INDICATION
    a) If patient is severely agitated, sedate with IV benzodiazepines.
    4) DIAZEPAM DOSE
    a) ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially, repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    5) LORAZEPAM DOSE
    a) ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Manno, 2003).
    b) CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    6) Extremely large doses of benzodiazepines may be required in patients with severe intoxication in order to obtain adequate sedation. Titrate dose to clinical response and monitor for hypotension, CNS and respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation.
    7) Butyrophenones should generally be avoided because they reduce seizure threshold and may increase the risk of hyperthermia and dysrhythmias.
    a) HALOPERIDOL: In a non-blinded retrospective case series, haloperidol (average dose: 5.6 mg; range: 1 to 15 mg) was given to 59 phencyclidine-intoxicated patients (age range: 19 to 54 years) via IV (n=25; 16.6%), IM (n=33; 21.9%), and oral (n=93; 61.6%) routes. Most patients received only 1 dose (range: 1 to 10 doses) with 30 patients receiving more than 1 dose. Overall, haloperidol was well tolerated in most cases with only 2 minor adverse events reported. One patient had a prolonged QTc of 0.475 after a 5 mg IV dose and another developed a hypoxic event with a pulse oximetry reading of 80% after receiving haloperidol 5 mg IM. Another patient had transient hypotension (BP 69/47 mmHg) after receiving haloperidol (2 mg orally) and lorazepam. A direct causal relationship to haloperidol was not established in any of these cases (MacNeal et al, 2012).
    8) Restraints should be avoided if possible, as their use may contribute to rhabdomyolysis (Lahmeyer & Stock, 1983). The use of phenothiazines has resulted in severe hypotension (Morgan & Solomon, 1978).
    F) BODY TEMPERATURE ABOVE REFERENCE RANGE
    1) Control agitation with benzodiazepines. External cooling methods should be employed aggressively. Enhance evaporative cooling by undressing the patient, spraying the skin with water and directing fans to enhance air flow across the skin. Ice packs may also be employed.
    G) MALIGNANT HYPERTENSION
    1) Mild to moderate hypertension is usually self-limited and does not require treatment unless the patient has persistent severe blood pressure elevations or end-organ damage (Baldridge & Bessen, 1990). Control agitation with benzodiazepines. If severe hypertension persists treat intravenous nitroprusside.
    2) DOSE: ADULT & CHILD: Initially 1 microgram/kilogram/minute by intravenous infusion; titrate up to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute as needed to achieve desired effect.
    3) ALTERNATE: Intravenous PHENTOLAMINE (ADULT: 2.5 to 5 milligrams every 5 minutes until hypertension is controlled then every 2 to 4 hours as needed; CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 milligram/kilogram/dose every 5 minutes until hypertension is controlled then every 1 to 4 hours as needed).
    H) ACIDIFICATION REGIME
    1) Urinary acidification is NOT recommended. The presence of rhabdomyolysis or closed head injury are absolute contraindications to acidification.
    I) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) VERAPAMIL: There is insufficient clinical experience available to recommend that verapamil should be used.
    a) Verapamil as an intravenous bolus dose given over 2 minutes (0.075 milligram/kilogram) is being evaluated in the treatment of PCP-induced psychosis. Verapamil appeared to be of benefit in a 29-year-old man who was reported to have ingested a large amount of phencyclidine (Price et al, 1986).
    b) Verapamil was given to a 42-year-old man as an intravenous drip containing 5 milligrams verapamil in 100 milliliters normal saline given over 20 minutes. Ten minutes after the start of the drip, he appeared to improve clinically (Montgomery & Mueller, 1985).
    c) A controlled study in rats revealed a significant potentiation of PCP-induced radial maze performance reduction by verapamil (McCann et al, 1986). These authors caution against the use of verapamil.
    2) In a dog model, monoclonal anti-phencyclidine Fab fragments decrease the volume of distribution of phencyclidine, decrease systemic and renal clearance and increase the percentage of dose recovered in urine (Valentine et al, 1994).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Dialysis or other methods of enhance elimination are not recommended. Urinary acidification will increase the excretion of PCP but the risk of systemic acidosis exceeds the potential benefit and it is not recommended.

Case Reports

    A) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) A 28-year-old exhibited bizarre behavior while on an airline flight and was admitted for evaluation. He passed two plastic bags through his rectum 13 days after ingestion and 11 days after hospitalization. One bag was ruptured. Analysis of the contents identified phencyclidine that was approximately 90% pure. No other toxins were detected by gas-liquid and thin-layer chromatography, or enzyme-mediated immunoassays. His clinical course had improved on day 1. He had received activated charcoal on admission. Over the next several days he developed rigidity, diaphoresis, fever (39.2 degrees C), mental status deterioration, respiratory failure requiring intubation, subcutaneous emphysema, mediastinal emphysema without pneumothorax, protracted seizures, and rhabdomyolysis. Once the bags had passed through his rectum, he made a rapid neurologic recovery. He was discharged on day 24 with clear consciousness, orientation, and cognition. He did have persistent dystonic jerking of his extremities. The maximum recorded serum PCP concentration was 1,879 ng/mL on day 4 of hospitalization (Jackson, 1989).
    B) ADULT
    1) A 21-year-old man with a history of poly drug abuse presented with violent and aggressive behavior. The onset of the psychiatric symptoms correlated well with a reported behavior following a 3-day PCP "trip." Initially, he responded well and was reported to be apparently under control with intramuscular fluphenazine treatment prior to this admission. Haloperidol was started at 20 mg/day and increased to 200 mg/day because of worsening behavior. Ten days after initiation of therapy haloperidol was decreased to 80 mg/day and fluphenazine enanthate 40 mg/day orally was begun. The fluphenazine was increased to 120 mg/day and intramuscular fluphenazine decanoate 37.5 mg every 4 to 7 days was started. Haloperidol was discontinued. Diazepam was ordered as needed up to 40 mg/day without improvement. One month after admission emergency bilateral ECT was given because of an increase in violence toward staff and patients. A total of 10 ECTs were given over 20 days. Oral fluphenazine was gradually decreased and then discontinued; IM fluphenazine was continued at 25 mg every 10 to 14 days. The patient's symptoms were under control and three weeks after conclusion of ECT treatment the patient was discharged (Grover et al, 1986).
    2) A 32-year-old male was found unresponsive with marked muscle rigidity and fasciculations. Horizontal and, later, vertical nystagmus was seen. A drug screen was positive for PCP and ethanol. An initial CPK was 124,500 mu/ml; creatinine and BUN peaked at 12.3 mg/100ml and 139 mg/100ml, respectively. The patient required hemodialysis for several days. The patients course was complicated by elevated liver enzymes secondary to hyperalimentation and hemoptysis secondary to a coagulopathy treated with fresh frozen plasma and bronchoscopy to remove clots. CNS and renal function gradually improved and he was discharged with normal mental status, renal and liver function on day 31 (Milhorn, 1990).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Symptoms are expected at doses of approximately 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg. A dose of 1 to 5 mg will normally result in euphoria and numbness, resembling ethanol intoxication. Doses of 5 to 10 mg often result in excitation, confusion, ataxia, and dysarthria. Prolonged coma, seizures, and death may result from 20 mg or more. Fatalities are more often related to trauma than to direct drug effects.
    B) Blood levels of 20 to 30 ng/mL may cause excitation and catatonia; 30 to 100 ng/mL may cause coma and myoclonus; above 100 ng/mL may cause seizures and hypotension.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) GENERAL
    1) Although structurally similar to the anesthetic ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar(R)), phencyclidine is not indicated for human use because of its potent psychomimetic properties. Phencyclidine is used either by smoking (amounts of 1 to 3 milligrams applied to plant material), by oral ingestion (2 to 6 milligrams), by intravenous injection (1 to 3 milligrams) or by nasal insufflation. Lethargy, disorientation, hallucinations and loss of coordination have been observed with these doses (Baselt, 2000).
    2) Phencyclidine (PCP, Sernylan(R)), a general anesthetic in veterinary medicine, was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in 1978 (HSDB , 2002).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) Ingestion of 150 to 200 mg in an acute overdose has resulted in death (Fisher & McDonald, 1984).
    2) Many deaths have occurred from the psychological effects of phencyclidine secondary to delusions of invulnerability. Acts of self-mutilation and violence have been reported (Fisher & McDonald, 1984).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) A dose of 1 to 5 mg will normally result in euphoria and numbness, resembling ethanol intoxication. Doses of 5 to 10 mg often result in excitation, confusion, ataxia, and dysarthria. Prolonged coma, seizures, and death may result from 20 mg or more (Young et al, 1987).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Blood levels of 20 to 30 nanograms/milliliter may cause excitation and catatonia. 30 to 100 nanograms/milliliter may cause coma and some myoclonus. Above 100 nanograms/milliliter may cause seizures and hypotension (Aronow & Done, 1978).
    b) Caution needs to be exercised in interpreting PCP levels as "street" PCP may contain an active precursor (PCC) or other psycho-active congeners. Urine PCP levels do not correlate with clinical toxicity (Walker et al, 1981).
    c) Plasma concentrations of PCP vary widely after overdose and have been reported to range from 49 to 3755 nanograms/milliliter (Domino & Wilson, 1977). Urine concentrations have been reported to be 10 to 20 times greater than plasma concentrations (Morgan & Solomon, 1978).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS77-10-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS77-10-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS77-10-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS77-10-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    1) 2800 mcg/kg
    B) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    1) 75 mg/kg

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Phencyclidine was developed as a synthetic anesthetic agent and is closely related to ketamine. Phencyclidine and about 30 or so analogues are arylcyclohexylamines.
    B) Phencyclidine is a dissociative anesthetic with sympathomimetic and hallucinogenic properties. Pharmacologic effects are generally dose related. PCP is thought to stimulate alpha-adrenergic receptors, potentiating the effects of norepinephrine, epinephrine and serotonin.

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) In a rat model, phencyclidine's (PCP) pharmacological actions were explained by three mechanisms. PCP increased pre-frontal cortex monoamine (dopamine and serotonin) release. PCP decreased GABA release and exhibited no net effect on glutamate release. The monoamine release was the result of a reduction in NMDA receptor glutamate release, reduced GABAergic inhibition via inhibition of the NMDA receptor and a direct enhancement of endoplasmic reticulum monoamine exocytosis (Zhu et al, 2004).

Physical Characteristics

    A) odorless white crystalline powder

Ph

    A) 2-5 (10% aqueous solution)

Molecular Weight

    A) 243.38

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There was no specific information on absorption at the time of this review.
    11.5.2) DISTRIBUTION
    A) DOG
    1) VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION - 20 L/kg in dogs (Jackson, 1989)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    5) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    6) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    9) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    10) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    11) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    12) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    13) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    14) Ahmad G: Abuse of phencyclidine (PCP): a laboratory experience. Clin Toxicol 1987; 25:341-346.
    15) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    16) Aronow R & Done AK: PCP overdose: An emerging concept of management. JACEP 1978; 7:56-59.
    17) Aronow R, Miceli JN, & Done AK: A therapeutic approach to the acutely overdosed PCP patient. J Psychedelic Drugs 1980; 12:259-266.
    18) Backberg M , Beck O , & Helander A : Phencyclidine analog use in Sweden--intoxication cases involving 3-MeO-PCP and 4-MeO-PCP from the STRIDA project. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(9):856-864.
    19) Baldridge EB & Bessen HA: Phencyclidine. Emerg Med Clin NA 1990; 8:541-550.
    20) Barton CH, Sterling ML, & Vaziri ND: Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure associated with phencyclidine intoxication. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140:568-569.
    21) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man. 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    22) Baumgartner AM, Jones PF, & Black CT: Detection of phencyclidine in hair. J Forensic Sci 1981; 26:576-581.
    23) Bessen HA: Intracranial hemorrhage associated with phencyclidine abuse. JAMA 1982; 248:585-586.
    24) Bond GR, Vinks AA, & Steele PE: Venlafaxine (VFX) and a false positive Abbott Axsym immunoassay for phencyclidine (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39(5):492.
    25) Briggs GG, Freeman RK, & Yaffe SJ: Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation. 5th ed, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1998.
    26) Bronner W, Nyman P, & von Minden D: Detectability of phencyclidine and 11-nor-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in adulterated urine by radioimmunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay. J Anal Toxicol 1990; 14:368-371.
    27) Bronson ME & Roberts J: Withdrawal from chronic phencyclidine produces a pentylenetetrazol-like discriminative stimulus. Life Sci 1992; 50:499-504.
    28) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    29) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    30) Brust JCM: Other agents. Phencyclidine, marijuana, hallucinogens, inhalants, and anticholinergics. Neurologic Clinics 1993; 11:555-561.
    31) Budai B & Iskandar H: Dextromethorphan can produce false positive phencyclidine testing with HPLC (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:61-62.
    32) Budd RD: PCP, a new drug of abuse. N Eng J Med 1980; 4:588.
    33) Burns RS & Lerner SE: Perspectives: acute phencyclidine intoxication. Clin Toxicol 1976; 9:477-501.
    34) Burns RS & Lerner SE: Phencyclidine deaths. JACEP 1978; 7:135-141.
    35) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    36) Castelli R, Thornton SL, Akpunonu P, et al: True or False? Analysis of phencyclidine positive urine drug immunoassays with liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry: 2015 Annual Meeting of the North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology (NACCT). Clin Toxicol 2015; 53(7):667-668.
    37) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    38) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    39) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    40) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    41) Cogen FC, Rigg G, & Simmons JL: Phencyclidine associated acute rhabdomyolysis. Ann Intern Med 1978; 88:210-212.
    42) Cook EC, Perez-Reyes M, & Jeffcoat AR: Phencyclidine disposition in humans after small doses of radiolabeled drug. Fed Proc 1983; 42:2566-2569.
    43) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    44) D'Onofrio G, McCausland JB, Tarabar AF, et al: Illy: clinical and public health implications of a street drug. Subst Abus 2006; 27(4):45-51.
    45) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    46) Davis WM, Hackett RB, & Obrosky KW: Factors in the lethality of iv phencyclidine in conscious dogs. Gen Pharmac 1991; 22:723-728.
    47) Domino EF & Wilson AE: Effects of urine acidification on plasma and urine phencyclidine levels in overdosage. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977; 22:421-424.
    48) Done AK, Aronow R, & Miceli JN: Pharmacokinetic observations in the treatment of phencyclidine poisoning. A preliminary report, in Rumack BH & Temple AR (ed): Management of the Poisoned Patient, Science Press, Princeton, NJ, 1977, pp 79-102.
    49) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    50) Eastman JW & Cohen SN: Hypertensive crisis and death associated with phencyclidine poisoning. JAMA 1975; 231:1270-1271.
    51) ElSohly MA, Little TL Jr, & Mitchell JM: GC/MS analysis of phencyclidine acid metabolite in human urine. J Analyt Toxicol 1988; 12:180-182.
    52) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    53) Elliott SP , Brandt SD , Wallach J , et al: First reported fatalities associated with the 'research chemical' 2-methoxydiphenidine. J Anal Toxicol 2015; 39(4):287-293.
    54) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    55) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    56) Fallis RJ, Aniline D, & Weiner LP: Massive phencyclidine intoxication. Arch Neurol 1982; 39:316.
    57) Fisher RB & McDonald F: Phencyclidine abuse in New Zealand. NZ Med J 1984; 97:608-611.
    58) Garey RE, Daul GC, & Samuels MS: PCP abuse in New Orleans: a six-year study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1987; 31:135-144.
    59) Geraci MJ, Peele J, McCoy SL, et al: Phencyclidine false positive induced by lamotrigine (Lamictal(R)) on a rapid urine toxicology screen. Int J Emerg Med 2010; 3(4):327-331.
    60) Giannini AJ, Loiselle RH, & Giannini MC: Space-based abstinence: alleviation of withdrawal symptoms in combinative cocaine-phencyclidine abuse. Clin Toxicol 1987; 25:493-500.
    61) Giles HG, Corrigall WA, & Khouw V: Plasma protein binding of phencyclidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 31:77-82.
    62) Golden NL, Sokol RJ, & Marther S: A practical method for identifying angel dust abuse during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142:359.
    63) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    64) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    65) Grant MW & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993, pp 1131.
    66) Grover D, Yeragani VK, & Keshavan MS: Improvement of phencyclidine-associated psychosis with ECT. J Clin Psychiatry 1986; 47:477-478.
    67) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    68) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    69) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    70) Hoffman RJ, Saddock V, & Nelson L: Effect of ketamine on phencyclidine imunoassays (PCPIa)(abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:523.
    71) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    72) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    73) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    74) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    75) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    76) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    77) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    78) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    79) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    80) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    81) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    82) Jackson JE: Phencyclidine pharmacokinetics after a massive overdose. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:613-615.
    83) Karp HN, Kaufman ND, & Anand SK: Phencyclidine poisoning in young children. J Pediatr 1980; 97:1006-1009.
    84) King AM, Pugh JL, Menke NB, et al: Nonfatal tramadol overdose may cause false-positive phencyclidine on Emit-II assay. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31(2):444-449.
    85) Lahmeyer HW & Stock PG: Phenycyclidine intoxication, physical restraints, and acute renal failure: case report. J Clin Psychiatry 1983; 44:184-185.
    86) Lipton MA: Phencyclidine in umbilical cord blood: some cautions. Am J Psychiatr 1983; 140:449.
    87) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    88) MacNeal JJ, Cone DC, Sinha V, et al: Use of haloperidol in PCP-intoxicated individuals. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2012; 50(9):851-853.
    89) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    90) McCann DJ, Smith CM, & Winter JC: A caution against use of verapamil in phencyclidine intoxication. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 43:679.
    91) McCarron MM, Schulze BW, & Thompson GA: Acute phencyclidine intoxication: Clinical patterns, complications, and treatment. Ann Emerg Med 1981a; 10:290-297.
    92) McCarron MM, Schulze BW, & Thompson GA: Acute phencyclidine intoxication: incidence of clinical findings in 1000 cases. Ann Emerg Med 1981b; 10:237-242.
    93) Milhorn HT: Phencyclidine intoxication: a case report. J MSMA 1990; 37-40.
    94) Misra AL, Pontani RB, & Bartolomea J: Persistence of phencyclidine (PCP) and metabolites in brain and adipose tissue. Research communications. Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1979; 24:431.
    95) Montgomery PT & Mueller ME: Treatment of PCP intoxication with verapamil. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:882.
    96) Morgan JP & Solomon JL: Phencyclidine. Clinical pharmacology and toxicity. State J Med 1978; 78:2035-2038.
    97) Morocco AP & Osterhoudt KC: Getting "wet" from recreational use of embalming fluid. Pediatr Case Rev 2003; 3:111-113.
    98) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    99) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    100) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    101) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    102) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    103) Nakki R, Koistinaho J, & Sharp FR: J Neuroscience 1995; 15:2097-2108.
    104) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    105) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    106) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    107) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    108) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    109) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    110) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    111) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    112) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    113) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    114) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    115) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    116) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    117) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    118) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    119) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    120) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    121) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    122) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    123) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    124) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    125) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    126) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    127) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    128) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    129) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    130) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    131) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    132) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    133) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    134) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    135) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    136) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    137) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    138) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    139) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    140) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    141) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    142) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    143) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    144) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    145) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    146) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    147) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    148) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    179) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    180) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    181) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    182) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    183) Nicholas JM: Phencylclidine: it's transfer across the placenta as well as into breast milk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143:143-146.
    184) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    185) Patel R, Ansari A, & Hughes JI: Myoglobinuric acute renal failure associated with phencyclidine abuse. West J Med 1979; 131:244-247.
    186) Patel R, Das M, & Palazzolo: Myoglobinuric acute renal failure in phencyclidine overdose: report of observation in eight cases. Ann Emerg Med 1980; 9:549-553.
    187) Patel R: Acute uric acid nephropathy: a complication of phencyclidine intoxication. Postgrad Med J 1982; 58:783-785.
    188) Picchioni AL & Consroe PF: Activated charcoal - a phencyclidine antidote, or hog in dogs. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:202.
    189) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    190) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    191) Price WA, Giannini AJ, & Krishen A: Management of acute PCP intoxication with verapamil. (Letter). Clin Toxicol 1986; 24:85-87.
    192) Product Information: CEREBYX(R) intravenous injection, fosphenytoin sodium intravenous injection. Pfizer Labs (per FDA), New York, NY, 2014.
    193) Product Information: Dilantin(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, phenytoin sodium intravenous injection, intramuscular injection. Parke-Davis (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.
    194) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    195) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    196) Rappolt RT & Gay GR: Emergency management of acute phencyclidine intoxication. JACEP 1979; 8:68.
    197) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    198) Rengarajan A & Mullins ME: How often do false-positive phencyclidine urine screens occur with use of common medications?. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2013; 51(6):493-496.
    199) Reynolds JE: Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th ed, The Pharmaceutical Press, London, England, 1982, pp 1740.
    200) Rogowski R & Krenzelok E: Averting the medical, social, and legal implications of a false positive phencyclidine determination (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:551.
    201) Santos PM, Lopez-Garcia P, Navarro JS, et al: False positive phencyclidine results caused by venlafaxine. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164(2):349-.
    202) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    203) Shannon M: Recent ketamine administration can produce a urine toxic screen which is falsely positive for phencyclidine (letter). Ped Emerg Care 1998; 14:180.
    204) Shesser R, Jotte R, & Olshaker J: The contribution of impurities to the acute morbidity of illegal drug use. Am J Emerg Med 1991; 9:336-342.
    205) Soine WH, Vincek WC, & Agee DT: Phencyclidine contaminant generates cyanide. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:438.
    206) Sramek JJ, Baumgartner WA, & Tallos JA: Hair analysis for detection of phencyclidine in newly admitted psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:950-953.
    207) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    208) Stein GY, Fradin Z, Ori Y, et al: Phencyclidine-induced multi-organ failure. Isr Med Assoc J 2005; 7(8):535-537.
    209) Strauss AA, Modanlou MD, & Bosu SK: Neonatal manifestations of maternal phencyclidine (PCP) abuse. Pediatrics 1981; 68:550-552.
    210) Syracuse CD, Kuhnert BR, & Golden NL: Measurement of the amino acid metabolite of phencyclidine by selected ion monitoring. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 1986; 13:113-115.
    211) Tabor BL, Smith-Wallace T, & Yonekura ML: Perinatal outcome associated with PCP versus cocaine use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1990; 16:337-348.
    212) Thombs DL: A review of PCP abuse trends and perceptions. Public Health Reports 1989; 104:325-328.
    213) Tschirgi T: Phencyclidine: A hidden risk of illicit drug use. PharmAlert 1990; 19:1-4.
    214) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    215) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    216) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    217) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    218) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    219) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    220) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    221) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    222) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    223) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    224) Valentine JL, Arnold LW, & Owens SM: Anti-phenycyclidine monoclonal fab fragments markedly alter phencyclidine pharmacokinetics in rats. J Pharmacol & Experiment Ther 1994; 269:1079-1085.
    225) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    226) Wachsman L, Schuetz S, & Chan LS: What happens to babies exposed to phencyclidine (PCP) in utero?. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1989; 15:31-39.
    227) Walker S, Yesavage JA, & Tinklenberg JR: Acute phencyclidine intoxication: quantitative urine levels and clinical management. Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138:674-675.
    228) Wallace KL: Toxin-Induced Seizures. In: Brent J, Wallace KL, Burkhart KK, et al, eds. Critical Care Toxicology, Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
    229) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    230) Wong LK & Biemann K: Metabolites of phencyclidine. Clin Toxicol 1976; 9:583-591.
    231) Woodworth JR, Owens SM, & Mayersohn M: Phencyclidine (PCP) disposition kinetics in dogs as a function of dose and route of administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985; 234:654-661.
    232) Young JD & Crapo LM: Protracted phencyclidine coma from an intestinal deposit. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:859-860.
    233) Young T, Lawson GW, & Gacono CB: Clinical aspects of phencyclidine (PCP). Int J Addict 1987; 22(1):1-15.
    234) Zhu G, Okada M, Uchiyama D, et al: Hyperactivity of endoplasmic reticulum associated exocytosis mechanism contributes to acute phencyclidine intoxication. J Pharmacol Sci 2004; 95:214-227.