MOBILE VIEW  | 

PCB-PBB

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) PCBs or PBBs are synthetic, polychlorinated or polybrominated biphenyls, sometimes found in combination together. Contaminants, such as dioxins and dibenzofurans, may also be present in these compounds, complicating their toxicity. Because of their environmental contamination and toxicity, production in the United States is now banned.

Specific Substances

    A) POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS -- SYNONYMS
    1) Chlorinated biphenyls
    2) Chlorinated diphenyls
    3) PCBs
    4) Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)
    5) Polychlorinated polyphenyls
    6) Polychlorinated quaterphenyls (PCQs)
    POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS -- SPECIFIC COMPOUNDS
    1) Aroclor 1016 (CAS 12674-11-2)
    2) Aroclor 1221 (CAS 11104-28-2)
    3) Aroclor 1232 (CAS 11141-16-5)
    4) Aroclor 1242 (CAS 11104-29-3)
    5) Aroclor 1248 (CAS 12672-29-6)
    6) Aroclor 1260 (CAS 11096-82-5)
    7) Aroclor 1262 (CAS 11104-28-2)
    8) Kanechlor 300 (CAS 37353-63-2)
    9) Kanechlor 400 (CAS 12737-87-0)
    10) Kanechlor 500 (CAS 37317-41-2)
    POLYBROMINATED BIPHENYLS -- SYNONYMS
    1) Brominated biphenyls
    2) Brominated diphenyls
    3) PBBs
    4) Polybrominated polyphenyls
    5) Polybrominated biphenyls [Firemaster BP-6] (CAS 59536-65-1)
    POLYBROMINATED BIPHENYLS -- SPECIFIC COMPOUNDS
    1) Decabromobiphenyl (CAS 13654-09-6)
    2) Hexabromobiphenyl (CAS 36355-01-8)
    3) Octabromobiphenyl
    4) FIREMASTER FF-1
    5) FIREMASTER BP-6
    GENERAL TERMS
    1) CHLORODIFENILI, CHLORO 54% (ITALIAN)
    2) FENCHLOR 42
    3) POLYCHLORINATED POLYPHENYLS
    4) CHLORINATED DIPHENYLS
    5) KANECHLOR S
    6) EPA PESTICIDE CHEMICAL CODE: 017801
    7) CHLOROPHEN (CAS 1336-36-3)
    8) CHLORODIFENILI, CHLORO 42% (ITALIAN)
    9) ACROCLOR
    10) CASWELL NO 672A

    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) PCBs C12H10-nCln
    2) PBBs C12H10-nBrn

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) PCB
    a) PCBs are a group of 209 synthetic organic compounds. They are light (colorless or straw-colored) to dark brown oils/liquids with typical chlorinated aromatic odors (42%-chlorodiphenyl is a mobile liquid, and 54%-chlorodiphenyl is a viscous liquid). They may also be sticky resinous semi-solids. Volatility increases significantly with small increases in temperature. Chemically they are described as biphenyls with 1 to 10 substituted chlorine atoms. Most widely used PCBs are 42%-chlorodiphenyl (containing 3 chlorine atoms in unassigned positions) and 54%-chlorodiphenyl (containing 5 chlorine atoms in unassigned positions) (Lewis, 1996; Sittig, 1991). The higher the chlorine content of the biphenyl compound, the more toxic it can be. Oxides are more toxic than the un-oxidized materials (Lewis, 1996). The extent of chlorination affects the resistance to temperature, high chemical stability, and electrical resistance (Raffle, 1994).
    b) Since the PCBs development in the 1930s, more than 886 million pounds have been produced and disposed of in relatively uncontrolled ways (Schardein, 1993). New use or further sale was banned in the US in 1979 (Lewis, 1998).
    c) PCBs are resistant to biodegradation and are chemically stable; thus, the potential environmental risks may be present for a long time. Low water solubility helps prevent high concentrations of PCBs from forming in drinking water supplies (Eschenroeder et al, 1986).
    d) Commercial PCB mixtures have been shown to contain other classes of toxic chlorinated derivative, such as chlorinated naphthalenes and chlorinated dibenzofurans (Sittig, 1991).
    2) PBB
    a) PBBs are a group of 209 synthetic organic compounds. They are white solids with no distinct odor. Chemically they are described as biphenyls with 1 to 10 substituted bromine atoms (Harbison, 1998).
    b) The commercial production of PBB in the United States was discontinued voluntarily by 1977. In 1988, the EPA established manufacturing control over PBBs by applying the "Significant New Use Rule" for domestic use, which identified "any use" of PBBs as a significant new use. This amounts to a de facto ban on manufacture of PBBs for domestic use (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    B) SOURCES
    1) PCB - It has been estimated that each year some 10 million pounds of PCBs escape into the environment, mainly through dumping, vaporization, spills, and leaks (Schardein, 1993). Workers may still be exposed when performing remediation or other hazardous waste activities (Harbison, 1998). Occupational exposure to PCB has also been documented in transformer fires when firefighters have been at risk, and from leaks from capacitors and transformers while being stored, repaired, maintained, or transported (Raffle, 1994).
    2) PCBs are prepared when biphenyl is chlorinated by anhydrous chlorine, with iron fillings or ferric chloride acting as a catalyst for this reaction. The time of contact (12-36 hours) between the biphenyl and anhydrous chlorine determines the degree of chlorination of the products (HSDB , 1999).
    3) Pigments/inks such as dairylide yellow, benzidine yellow, and phthalocyanine blues and greens (non-Cl, CP, AP approved) may contain PCBs (McMann, 1984).
    C) USES
    1) PCB - As a result of their excellent electrical insulating properties, PCBs found their largest application to be in electrical equipment, including electrical transformers and capacitors. They have also been used in hydraulic fluids and lubricants, gas-transmission turbines, petroleum additives, heat transfer fluids, carbonless copy paper, pesticide extenders, dedusting agents, fire retardants, and plasticizers (Budavari, 1996; Freeman, 1989).
    2) PBB - PBBs have been used as flame retardants, mainly in plastics requiring high heat resistance. When PBBs are added to the mixing process to make various plastics, the finished products have none of the potentially hazardous characteristics of the original materials. Thus no hazard is posed to persons handling, fabricating, and assembling such PBB-containing products. "Only very high heat may release decomposition products, which may be entirely different compounds" (Zenz, 1994).
    3) Others have reported that individuals especially at risk for PCB-PBB poisoning include: electricians, appliance service workers, utility workers, and firefighters (Letz, 1983).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) PCBs have low acute toxicity, but because they accumulate in the environment and in animal and human tissues, the potential for chronic or delayed toxicity is significant.
    B) DERMAL EFFECTS - In humans, dermal effects include chloracne, simple erythematous eruptions with pruritus, acute eczematous contact dermatitis, burning sensation and edema of the face and hands, thickening of the skin, pigmentation of skin and nails, excessive eye discharge, swelling of eyelids, and distinctive hair follicles.
    C) LIVER EFFECTS - In persons with systemic intoxication, usual signs and symptoms are nausea, vomiting, weight loss, jaundice, edema, and abdominal pain.
    D) NEUROLOGIC EFFECTS - Headache, dizziness, depression, and nervousness may occur. Muscle and joint pain have been observed.
    E) GASTROINTESTINAL EFFECTS - Severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported following acute and chronic exposures.
    F) FETOTOXIC EFFECTS - Fetotoxic effects have been reported following maternal exposure in both humans and experimental animals.
    G) TOXIC DERIVATIVES - At 1112 to 1202 degrees F, polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans can be formed. Signs and symptoms of exposure to these derivatives may include lymphoid depletion, thymic atrophy, liver damage, hemorrhage, and chloracne.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) PCBs are mildly irritating to eyes and skin. Possible symptoms include facial edema, eye discharge, swollen eyelids, conjunctival hyperemia, and visual and hearing disturbances.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Increases in diastolic and systolic blood pressure may occur.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Weakness and numbness of the extremities and headache have been reported.
    B) Neurobehavioral and psychomotor impairment have been reported after occupational and in utero exposure.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) GI upset and diarrhea have been reported.
    0.2.9) HEPATIC
    A) Liver damage is a consistent finding in animal studies. Clinical hepatitis was seen in the Yusho epidemic. Consistent documentation of elevated hepatic enzymes after chronic exposure has been difficult to demonstrate.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Chloracne is a specific skin reaction associated with cyclic halogenated compounds. Children with in utero high exposures appear to have a higher rate of dermal reactions, including hyperpigmentation, acne and itching.
    B) Even short term dermal contact may contribute significantly to all symptoms of long term exposure.
    0.2.16) ENDOCRINE
    A) Asymptomatic hyperthyroxinemia has been reported.
    0.2.17) METABOLISM
    A) PCBs are potent enzymes inducers, more potent than phenobarbital.
    B) Serum triglycerides may become elevated following toxic exposures.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) One of the potential symptoms of occupational PCB overexposure is decreased birth weight in offspring of exposed mothers.
    B) Although relative small quantities of PCBs reach the fetus, significant PCB overexposure can cause teratogenic effects. PBBs are experimental teratogens.
    C) Both PCBs and PBBs concentrate in milk.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) PCBs should be considered potential human carcinogens. Increased mortality from pancreatic cancer, brain cancer, and melanoma have been reported in several studies of human exposure to PCBs.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) The background level of PCBs in blood is approximately 20 ppb.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) EMESIS - In almost all cases, ingestions of PCBs or PBBs will not be recognized until long after emesis would be of any value. Vomiting of the pure substance may cause aspiration.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL - The value of administering activated charcoal for an acute, known ingestion is unknown. Activated charcoal is a fairly benign treatment, and therefore, should be considered after acute ingestion.
    C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    D) THERE IS LITTLE SPECIFIC TREATMENT. Patients should be monitored for increased hepatic enzymes, chloracne, and the nonspecific eye, gastrointestinal, and neurologic symptoms seen in the Yusho poisonings.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) A post-contamination washing cannot be assumed to remove PCBs. In animal studies only 59% of applied PCBs were removed from the skin with immediate washings with water and acetone, and only 1% was removed washing 24 hours after exposure. Multiple soap and water washings are necessary.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) Toxicity of the compounds may vary by impurities present. Polychlorinated dibenzofurans and other highly toxic compounds have been found as contaminants. Symptoms are expected after a minimal oral intake of 500 mg. In the Yusho experience, the average Japanese intake was 72.4 mcg/day.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) PCBs have low acute toxicity, but because they accumulate in the environment and in animal and human tissues, the potential for chronic or delayed toxicity is significant.
    B) DERMAL EFFECTS - In humans, dermal effects include chloracne, simple erythematous eruptions with pruritus, acute eczematous contact dermatitis, burning sensation and edema of the face and hands, thickening of the skin, pigmentation of skin and nails, excessive eye discharge, swelling of eyelids, and distinctive hair follicles.
    C) LIVER EFFECTS - In persons with systemic intoxication, usual signs and symptoms are nausea, vomiting, weight loss, jaundice, edema, and abdominal pain.
    D) NEUROLOGIC EFFECTS - Headache, dizziness, depression, and nervousness may occur. Muscle and joint pain have been observed.
    E) GASTROINTESTINAL EFFECTS - Severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported following acute and chronic exposures.
    F) FETOTOXIC EFFECTS - Fetotoxic effects have been reported following maternal exposure in both humans and experimental animals.
    G) TOXIC DERIVATIVES - At 1112 to 1202 degrees F, polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans can be formed. Signs and symptoms of exposure to these derivatives may include lymphoid depletion, thymic atrophy, liver damage, hemorrhage, and chloracne.

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) PCBs are mildly irritating to eyes and skin. Possible symptoms include facial edema, eye discharge, swollen eyelids, conjunctival hyperemia, and visual and hearing disturbances.
    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) Facial edema may occur.
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IRRITATION - PCBs are mildly irritating to eyes and skin at concentrations of 0.1 mg/m(3), and unbearable at 10 mg/m(3) (Letz, 1983).
    1) Oculodermatological findings following occupational exposures have included hyperpigmentation of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae, swollen upper eyelids, enlarged Meibomian glands, and lacrimation (Fischbein et al, 1985; Grant, 1993).
    B) YUSHO POISONING - HEENT symptoms caused during the Yusho poisoning included subcutaneous facial edema, cheese-like discharge from the eyes, swelling of the eyelids, transient visual disturbances, hyperemia of the conjunctiva, and hearing difficulties (Kuratsune, 1972).
    C) Clinically, hypersecretion of the Meibomian glands occurs. This not only produces creamy discharge on the surface of the cornea but also causes disturbance of vision. Abnormality of these glands can still be evident even after 16 years (Grant, 1993).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) Acute inhalational exposures may cause nasal irritation (CDC, 1985).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) Acute inhalational exposures may cause throat irritation (CDC, 1985).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Increases in diastolic and systolic blood pressure may occur.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) One study demonstrated a slight increase in systolic and a statistically significant increase in diastolic pressure for patients exposed to PCBs (Kreis et al, 1981).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Weakness and numbness of the extremities and headache have been reported.
    B) Neurobehavioral and psychomotor impairment have been reported after occupational and in utero exposure.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MUSCLE WEAKNESS
    1) Weakness and numbness of the extremities have been reported (Kuratsune et al, 1972; Dally et al, 1987; Tretjak et al, 1990).
    B) HEADACHE
    1) INCIDENCE
    a) Headache occurred in 26 of 115 (22 percent) exposed persons following exposure to combustion products of PCB (Dally et al, 1987).
    b) Headache occurred in 15 percent of persons exposed to the overheating of a transformer which released an oily mist containing PCBs. The headaches were transient, lasting no longer than one day (CDC, 1985).
    C) IMPAIRED COGNITION
    1) Neurobehavioral dysfunction with cognitive impairment and memory loss has been reported in firemen six months after a single exposure (Kilburn et al, 1989), and in 4-year-old children exposed in utero (Jacobson et al, 1990).
    2) Chen et al (1992) also examined the offspring of mothers exposed to PCB-contaminated oil in Taiwan and found the children scored an average of 5 points lower on the Stanford-Binet cognitive development test than did non-exposed children. This effect persisted up to age 7 years, and affected children born long after the exposure.
    3) Cognitive impairment has been reported in children at 42 months of age exposed in utero (Patandin et al, 1999). In another study, in utero exposures were shown to result in long-term intellectual effects in children at 11 years of age (Jacobson & Jacobson, 1996).
    D) IMPAIRED PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT
    1) Psychomotor impairment has been reported in 6- and 12-month-old infants exposed in utero (Gladen et al, 1988).
    2) PCB’s had a more pronounced effect on motor development versus mental development at 6 months among Japanese children whose mothers had elevated background levels of PCB’s during the prenatal period (Nakajima et al, 2006).
    E) NEUROPATHY
    1) INCIDENCE -
    a) DECREASED NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY - Following a rice cooking oil PCB contamination, 110 patients were evaluated for motor nerve disturbances. Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities (NCV) were significantly slower in the poisoned patients as compared to controls, with 43.6 percent experiencing slowing of the sensory NCV and 21.8 percent experiencing slowing of the motor NCV (Chen et al, 1985).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) GI upset and diarrhea have been reported.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTRITIS
    1) Diarrhea may occur following acute exposures. Gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea were reported with the Yusho group (Kuratsune et al, 1972).
    B) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) In persons who have suffered systemic intoxication, the usual signs and symptoms are nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and abdominal pain (Sax & Lewis, 1989).
    2) CASE REPORT - Severe abdominal pain, prompting an exploratory laparotomy, was present in a 33-year-old female following occupational exposure to PCB over several years. Findings consisted of a regional mesenteric lymphadenitis (Tretjak et al, 1990).
    C) NAUSEA
    1) INCIDENCE
    a) 27.5 percent of patients acutely exposed to an overheated transformer leaking an oily mist containing PCBs experienced nausea (CDC, 1985).
    3.8.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) PBB has caused decreased milk production, salivation, lacrimation, diarrhea, inappetence, dehydration, and weight loss in cattle exposed to contaminated feedstock (Lewis, 1998).

Hepatic

    3.9.1) SUMMARY
    A) Liver damage is a consistent finding in animal studies. Clinical hepatitis was seen in the Yusho epidemic. Consistent documentation of elevated hepatic enzymes after chronic exposure has been difficult to demonstrate.
    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC HEPATITIS
    1) Clinical hepatitis was reported with the acute ingestions involved with the Yusho epidemic (Kuratsune et al, 1972).
    B) JAUNDICE
    1) In persons who have suffered systemic intoxication, the usual signs and symptoms include jaundice. Patients suffering severe liver damage may become comatose prior to death (Sax & Lewis, 1989).
    C) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    a) Consistent documentation of elevated hepatic enzymes after chronic exposure has been difficult to demonstrate (Letz, 1983).
    b) Emmett et al (1988) showed a statistically significant positive correlation between adipose PCBs and serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). The clinical significance of this remains unknown.
    c) CASE REPORT - Transient elevation of liver enzymes occurred in a 33-year-old female after several years of occupational exposure to PCBs. Light microscopy of a liver biopsy revealed swollen hepatocytes and a moderate steatosis (Tretjak et al, 1990).
    3.9.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEPATOCELLULAR DAMAGE
    a) Liver damage is a consistent finding in tests done on laboratory animals.
    2) PORPHYRIA
    a) Hepatic porphyria has been reported in animals, but not yet in man (Letz, 1983).
    3) HEPATOMEGALY
    a) Subchronic feedings of PCB 156 in rats resulted in enlarged livers and a loss of hepatic retinoids (van Brigelen et al, 1994).
    4) HEPATIC FUNCTION ABNORMAL
    a) Autopsy of cattle exposed to PBB contaminated feedstock showed lesions in liver and gallbladder and even cancer of the liver (Baselt & Cravey, 1995; Lewis, 1998).
    b) Liver toxicity was reported in a study of Sprague-Dawley rats, where 650 male and 650 female animals were treated with various PBB containing food (Mayes et al, 1998).
    1) This toxicity was indicated by elevated serum enzyme activity, elevated serum cholesterol concentration, decreases in hematologic parameters, hepatocellular hypertrophy, and increased incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms and altered hepatocellular foci.
    2) In this study, the liver toxicity, particularly increased incidence of hepatocellular neoplasms, was distinctly more severe in females than in

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PORPHYRIA DUE TO TOXIC EFFECT OF SUBSTANCE
    1) A small number of humans accidentally exposed to PCBs in a transformer fire demonstrated small elevations in urinary uroporphyrin levels and decreased coproporphyrin levels (Osterloh et al, 1987).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) TOXIC NEPHROPATHY
    a) Autopsy of cattle exposed to PBB contaminated feedstock showed lesions in kidney (Lewis, 1998).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Chloracne is a specific skin reaction associated with cyclic halogenated compounds. Children with in utero high exposures appear to have a higher rate of dermal reactions, including hyperpigmentation, acne and itching.
    B) Even short term dermal contact may contribute significantly to all symptoms of long term exposure.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CHLORINE ACNE
    1) Chloracne is a specific skin reaction associated with cyclic halogenated compounds. The skin is dry with noninflammatory comedones and pale yellow cysts containing sebaceous matter and keratin. Some evidence of liver disease is often seen in association with chloracne (Hathaway et al, 1996). It resembles adolescent acne, but has distinct cystic, skin-colored lesions and comedones, both of which may become inflamed and infected (Letz, 1983).
    a) It occurs at any age and may be found on trunk, shoulders, arms, legs, face, ears, neck, chest, abdomen, or back. The condition is very persistent and resistant to treatment (Hathaway et al, 1996; Letz, 1983).
    b) It may occur from either dermal contact or from systemic absorption (Letz, 1983; Dally et al, 1987).
    c) CASE REPORT - Tretjak et al (1990) reported chloracne in a patient following dermal absorption from occupational exposure. Hyperpigmentation, skin thickening and photosensitivity accompanied the chloracne.
    B) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) INCIDENCE
    a) CASE SERIES - 17 of 115 (14 percent) exposed persons developed pruritus following exposure to combustion products of PCB (Dally et al, 1987). Children whose mothers were directly exposed to PCBs tended to have more generalized itching, localized skin infections and hair loss than non-exposed children (Gladen et al, 1990).
    C) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) Children exposed in-utero to higher concentrations of PCBs had increased rates of hyperpigmentation, eyelid swelling and discharge, deformed nails, acne, natal teeth and swollen gums (Gladen et al, 1990).
    3.14.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) NAIL DISORDER
    a) MONKEYS - Rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys administered oral Aroclor 1254 for up to 27 months (daily for 5 days/week) all experienced nail disorders, beginning with dry and necrotic nail beds, then loss of nails with regrowth, then second loss of nails (Arnold et al, 1990).
    2) ALOPECIA
    a) CATTLE - PBB caused alopecia and abnormal growth of hooves in cattle exposed to contaminated feed stock. Failing and moribund animals displayed extensive subcutaneous edema and hemorrhage (Lewis, 1998).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISORDER OF BONE DEVELOPMENT
    1) First generation children of the Yu-Cheng oil contamination were reported to have significantly shorter stature, decreased total lean mass, and decreased soft tissue content as compared to controls. This effect was reported only in the first generation children (Guo et al, 1994).

Endocrine

    3.16.1) SUMMARY
    A) Asymptomatic hyperthyroxinemia has been reported.
    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERTHYROIDISM
    1) Hyperthyroxinemia was reported in victims of the 1968 Japanese "Yusho incident" 16 years post-exposure. Although serum thyroxine and triiodothyronine levels were elevated, TSH levels were normal. No symptoms of hyperthyroidism were noted (Murai et al, 1987).
    B) LACTATION
    1) CASE REPORT - A spontaneous, bluish-green, nipple discharge occurred in a 33-year-old female following several years of occupational exposure to PCBs, including 9 months of possible direct skin contact. At first, only a few drops were visible, but over a 9 year period, the quantity increased, up to 200 mL in one day. Lactation was not suppressed with bromocritptine (Tretjak et al, 1990).
    C) DIABETES MELLITUS
    1) CASE SERIES - Based on a population-based study in Belgium, 257 subjects (142 women and 115 men) were potentially exposed to environmental dioxins and PCBs. Subjects were obtained from five regions within Belgium, which included living near an iron and steel plant or around a waste dumping site; individuals potentially occupationally exposed to the chemicals were excluded. The findings indicated that diabetic individuals had higher serum levels of dioxins, coplanar PCBs, and the 12 PCB markers. Also, the results indicated a significant increase in the risk of diabetes was found in the most exposed subjects, suggesting a dose-response effect. All parameters remained statistically significant even after adjustment for possible confounders. The authors suggested that further large scale studies are needed to confirm potential causality (Fierens et al, 2003).
    D) ENDOCRINE SYSTEM ALTERATION
    1) A study of the effects of the non-ortho 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) and 3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl (PCB 77) the mono-ortho 2,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobipyhenyl (PCB 118), and the di-ortho substituted 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB 153) on the human prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP found evidence supporting the concept of PCB endocrine activity resulting from direct stimulation of the steroid hormone receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor. In addition, the coplanar (non-ortho (dioxin-like) PCBs, PCB 126 AND PCB 77) demonstrated greater anti-androgenic properties than the ortho-substituted PCBs (118 and 153). These findings are in agreement with the toxic equivalent factor rating scale of TCDD > PCB 126 > PCB 77 > PCB 118 > PCB 153. The authors concluded that modulation of post-transcriptional targets may account for some of the endocrine disrupting properties of single PCB congeners (Endo et al, 2003).
    E) MENARCHE
    1) Menarche was more likely to occur among females with higher PCB burdens compared to age matched females (Denham et al, 2005).
    3.16.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ALTERED HORMONE LEVEL
    a) Estrogenic activity has been reported with polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls, metabolites of PCBs (McKinney et al, 1990). However, this has not been observed in humans.
    2) THYROID DISORDER
    a) The thyroid gland has been reported as a target organ for PBB poisoning in animals (Hathaway et al, 1996).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ATYPICAL LYMPHOCYTES
    1) Although damage to lymphatic tissue has been reported in animals (Luster et al, 1979), a study of Michigan farmers exposed to PBBs did not show any statistical difference in the number or function of lymphocytes (Landrigan et al, 1979).
    3.19.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) PBBs are immunotoxic in animals. They can cause atrophy of lymphoid tissue, reduced size of the spleen, lymphopenia, and suppression of humoral immunity in laboratory animals. In addition, autopsy of cattle exposed to contaminated feedstock showed lesions in the thymus (Lewis, 1998).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) One of the potential symptoms of occupational PCB overexposure is decreased birth weight in offspring of exposed mothers.
    B) Although relative small quantities of PCBs reach the fetus, significant PCB overexposure can cause teratogenic effects. PBBs are experimental teratogens.
    C) Both PCBs and PBBs concentrate in milk.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) HUMANS
    1) Epidemiology data is not sufficient to determine the relative risk of PCB exposure to humans (Clayton & Clayton, 1994), although studies have reported teratogenic effects in humans after PCB exposure (HSDB , 2000) Raffle, 1994; (Gladen et al, 1990).
    2) Hyperpigmentation, skeletal anomalies, neurodevelopmental deficits, neonatal behavioral abnormalities, poorer recognition memory and performance on infant cognitive function tests, and decreased birth weight for gestational age may occur after maternal exposure (Schardein, 1993; Mattison & Cullen, 1994).
    3) Although PBBs are experimental teratogens (Lewis, 1996), no birth defects in human or livestock attributable to the exposure were ever documented (Schardein, 1993).
    4) Children (n = 128) exposed in utero to high concentrations of PCBs were studied. A disproportionate amount of hyperpigmentation, deformed nails, acne, eyelid swelling and discharge, natal teeth, and swollen gums were found (Gladen et al, 1990).
    5) The Yusho epidemic produced 15 cases of reproductive and fetotoxic human effects. Two stillbirths, 10 cases of abnormal pigmentation, 9 cases of ocular discharge, and 12 of 13 cases of below natural birth weights were reported in this group. Persistent abnormalities were not seen in this group when followed for years (Hammond, 1972).
    a) Both animal studies and epidemiologic data from the Yusho epidemic would indicate that males are more susceptible to the teratogenic effects than females (Kuratsune et al, 1972) Hurtz, 1973).
    6) In one study, 55 first generation children born to mothers who ate PCB-contaminated rice oil were found to have significantly shorter stature, decreased total lean mass, and decreased soft tissue content as compared to controls. These poisoning effects were significant only in first born children and not in subsequent children born to these mothers (Guo et al, 1994).
    7) Rogan et al (1988) examined and evaluated 117 children born to mothers who were previously exposed to cooking oil contaminated by thermally degraded polychlorinated biphenyls in Taiwan in 1979 and 108 unexposed controls. Exposed children were lighter and shorter than controls. They also had a higher frequency of abnormalities of gingiva, skin, nails, teeth, and lungs than controls. The exposed children showed delay of developmental milestones, deficits on formal developmental testing, and abnormalities on behavioral assessment (Rogan et al, 1988).
    8) In 1978 and 1979, approximately 2000 Taiwanese people were exposed to PCBs and polychlorinated dibenzofurans from ingestion of contaminated rice. The children of women who were exposed were born with retarded growth, with dysmorphic physical findings, a significantly higher percentage of natal teeth, and swollen gums. During development, delayed cognitive development, attention deficit, behavioral problems and increased upper respiratory tract infections and otitis media were observed compared with unexposed children. These children also had increased rates of hyperpigmentation, eyelid swelling and discharge, deformed nails, and acne scars (Guo et al, 2004).
    9) PCBs were measured in serum samples from 399 mothers to determine the effect on fetal growth. For male infants, an increase from the 10th to the 90th percentile in total PCBs was associated with a 290 g lower birth weight; 6.7 mm decrease in head circumference; and weight for gestational age, a reduction in z-score of 0.57. For female infants, an increase from the 10th to the 90th percentile in total PCBs was related to a 28 g lower birth weight, a 4.0 mm decrease in head circumference, and 4.7 fewer gestational days (Hertz-Picciotto et al, 2005).
    10) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) Thirty-three children born to mothers living on PBB contaminated farms were examined at an average of 37 months of age and compared with controls. No effects on growth, physical exam, or neurologic assessment could be demonstrated (Weil et al, 1981).
    11) MENTAL DEFICIENCY
    a) Chen et al (1992) also examined the offspring of mothers exposed to PCB-contaminated oil in Taiwan and found the children scored an average of 5 points lower on the Stanford-Binet cognitive development test than did non-exposed children. This effect persisted up to age 7 years, and affected children born long after the exposure (Chen & Gaylor, 1992).
    b) The effects of elevated background levels of dioxin isomers and PCB's during the prenatal period in Japanese women were studied. PCB's were found to have a more pronounced effect on motor development versus mental development at 6 months (Nakajima et al, 2006).
    c) After exposure in utero, cognitive impairment has been reported in children at 42 months of age (Patandin et al, 1999). In another study, in utero exposures were shown to result in long-term intellectual effects in children at 11 years of age (Jacobson & Jacobson, 1996).
    d) Psychomotor impairment has been reported in 6- and 12-month-old infants exposed in utero (Gladen et al, 1988).
    e) Neural developmental anomalies due to in utero exposure to PCB have been reported in studies of 236 children delivered of women who had consumed PCB contaminated Lake Michigan fish. The anomalies included neonatal behavioral abnormalities, poorer recognition memory, poorer performance on Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, poorer performance on the psychomotor index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and poorer performance on infant cognitive function tests. These children at 4 years of age still had serum PCB levels predictive of poorer short-term memory function on both verbal and quantitative tests in a dose-dependent fashion (Schardein, 1993).
    12) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) Embryotoxicity, including fetal death, fetal resorption, cleft palate, dilated renal pelvis, and hypoplasia of the thymus were observed after maternal administration, with an ED50 of 100 mg/kg (d'Argy et al, 1987).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In animals, PCBs have been demonstrated to cause adverse reproductive effects including fetotoxicity and teratogenicity (Hathaway et al, 1996; Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    2) Mammalian reproductive effects include changes in the estrus cycle, implantation failure, increased abortions, low birth weight offspring, and decreased postnatal survival (Letz, 1983).
    3) When PCB 169 was administered once (1.8 g/kg) during pregnancy to rats, effects on developmental parameters, dopamine regulation and fertility of the offspring were noted (Sauer et al, 1994).
    4) Female offspring of rats were administered daily PCB 126 from two weeks prior to mating until twenty days after delivery . Exposed rats demonstrated delayed vaginal opening, urogenital anomalies, and abnormal morphological and functional development of female reproductive system compared with unexposed control animals (Shirota et al, 2006).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) HUMANS
    1) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    a) During pregnancy, PCBs can cross the placental barrier (Lewis, 1996), and have been found in (human) umbilical cord blood and in tissues of newborn humans and animals (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    2) FETAL/NEONATAL ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) In a study of 613 infants born to 330 women exposed to PBB and PCB through contaminated food after an industrial accident, an association between in utero PBB exposure and Apgar scores below the median at 1 and 5 minutes was observed. Both low birth weight and preterm birth significantly increased the risk of Apgar scores below median. Abnormal conditions at birth, infants born to mother's that experienced complications during labor and delivery, and infants who were their mother's first pregnancy or live birth also increased this risk. No association between in utero PCB exposure and below-median Apgar scores was observed (Terrell et al, 2015).
    3) FETOTOXICITY
    a) Decreased birth weight and gestational age in the offspring were reported in one study of 200 women in upstate New York. These women were occupationally exposed to PCB during the manufacture of capacitors (Schardein, 1993).
    b) Decreased birth weight was also reported in a study of 236 children delivered of women who had consumed PCB contaminated Lake Michigan fish (Schardein, 1993).
    4) SEX RATIO
    a) A study examined the parental serum PCB concentration in relation to the sex ratio of 173 children of mothers and 208 children of fathers who had consumed fish contaminated with PCBs. For mothers in the highest quintile, the odds of having a male child was reduced by 82%, compared with the lowest quintile. No effect of paternal serum PCB concentration was observed on the odds of a male child (Weisskopf et al, 2003).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Rhesus monkeys, treated with oral Aroclor 1254, were mated to non-treated monkeys. All of the treated monkeys aborted with 30 to 60 days following pregnancy (Arnold et al, 1990).
    2) Depressed fertility, abortion, stillbirth, postnatal skin lesions, alteration in morphology and functional development of female reproductive system, intoxication, and death have been noted in animal studies (Shirota et al, 2006; Schardein, 1993; McCoy et al, 1995; RTECS , 2000).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) HUMANS
    1) BREAST MILK
    a) PCBs and PBBs are concentrated and excreted in breast milk (HSDB , 2000; Clayton & Clayton, 1994) Raffle, 1994; (Schardein, 1993).
    1) PCB
    a) Human breast milk contaminated with PCBs appears to be a source of exposure for nursing infants. Developmental abnormalities have been observed in PCB-intoxicated infants including premature eruption of teeth, larger frontal and occipital fontanelles, exophthalmos, and the maintenance of an abnormally wide sagittal suture (HSDB , 2000).
    b) The amount of PCB in breast milk ranges from 0 to 390 ppb, depending on the geographic location (Wasserman et al, 1979). Levels in human breast milk have slowly and steadily declined from 1984 to 1991 probably due to the production ban of PCBs. Human milk has been used as a bioindicator for body burden of PCBs, since fat from milk is in approximate equilibrium with body fat stores (Furst et al, 1994).
    c) Johansen et al (1994) found the congener (congener specific determination is required for risk assessment of exposure to PCBs), PCB 153, to be the dominant di-ortho congener in all their samples, representing 30 percent of the PCBs in human milk.
    d) Rogan et al (1986) found no higher PCB levels in human milk from women with casual exposure to PCB spills than in milk from women with background exposure. Also, higher PCB levels were found in the first lactations, and declined with time spent breast-feeding and with the number of children nursed.
    e) Coplanar PCBs were measured in the milk of remote maritime populations (Inuit women) exposed to high levels in fish. Levels were 3.5 times higher in the Inuit women than the control (Caucasian women) (Dewailly et al, 1994).
    2) PBB
    a) The amount of PBBs in breast milk was 107 to 119 times that found in serum (Eystr et al, 1983). No adverse effects could be demonstrated in the usual US population; the only change in the breast feeding recommendation was to limit the duration of breast feeding in mothers who had high breast milk fat PCB levels (Wickizer & Brilliant, 1981).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS11097-69-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    B) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS53469-21-9 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    C) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS67774-32-7 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    D) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS59536-65-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Polybrominated biphenyls [Firemaster BP-6]
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 2A
    1) The agent (mixture) is probably carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are probably carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some cases, an agent (mixture) may be classified in this category when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence that the carcinogenesis is mediated by a mechanism that also operates in humans. Exceptionally, an agent, mixture or exposure circumstance may be classified in this category solely on the basis of limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans.
    E) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS1336-36-3 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 1
    1) The agent (mixture) is carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent (mixture) may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent (mixture) acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) PCBs should be considered potential human carcinogens. Increased mortality from pancreatic cancer, brain cancer, and melanoma have been reported in several studies of human exposure to PCBs.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) SUMMARY
    1) As of 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has placed polychlorinated biphenyls under review; it has currently classified polychlorinated biphenyls as Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans) (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015).
    B) CARCINOMA
    1) PCBs are clearly carcinogens in animals, producing liver tumors in rats. Although human studies have not been conclusive, PCBs should be considered potential human carcinogens (Letz, 1983). There has been reported a slight increase in melanoma of the skin in men occupationally exposed to PCBs (Deichmann, 1981) and in a retrospective cohort analysis of electrical capacitor manufacturing workers exposed to PCBs (Sinks et al, 1992). The follow-up to this cohort study, through 1998, confirmed the original study’s findings of increased melanoma and brain cancer deaths (Ruder et al, 2006).
    2) Evidence from epidemiological studies in Japan suggested a potential risk for PCB carcinogenicity in humans (Clayton & Clayton, 1994). Compounds in this group have been associated with hepatocellular carcinomas, cholangiocarcinomas, intestinal neoplasias, pancreatic tumors, brain cancers, lung tumors, and malignant melanoma in humans and experimental animals (Prince et al, 2006; Finkel, 1983; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Shalat et al, 1989; Yassi et al, 1994; Sinks et al, 1992; Shields et al, 1992; Gustavsson et al, 1986).
    C) RENAL CARCINOMA
    1) Renal adenocarcinoma has occurred in workers chronically exposed to PCBs. Of note is that in this report, the neoplasms were strikingly similar cytologically. In addition, all three patients were young males, in whom this malignancy is rare (Shalat et al, 1989).
    D) GASTRIC CARCINOMA
    1) PANCREATIC CANCER - Exposure-related increased risk for death from pancreatic cancer was seen in a cohort of 2,222 transformer workers exposed to PCB's in transformer fluid (Yassi et al, 1994).
    E) BRAIN CARCINOMA
    1) A retrospective cohort analysis of 3588 electrical capacitor manufacturing workers exposed to PCBs showed a small increase in brain tumors as compared to non-exposed workers. The results are inconclusive, but may show some evidence of association between chronic PCB exposures and brain malignancies (Sinks et al, 1992). A follow-up of this study 14 years later reported that deaths from brain cancer were elevated in those working with PCB >/= 90 days (Ruder et al, 2006).
    F) LEUKEMIA
    1) No significantly increased PCB levels in bone marrow were found in leukemic children as compared to healthy children. The authors suggest that because the sample size was small, the risk of leukemia from PCB exposures cannot be completely ruled out (Scheele et al, 1992).
    G) LYMPHOMA-LIKE DISORDER
    1) One malignant lymphoma and one mesenchymal tumor was reported in a cohort study of 142 workers in a capacitor plant. Results from this study are inconclusive due to the small size of the cohort and lack of adequate follow-up. However, no excess mortality or cancer incidence was found in this small group (Gustavsson et al, 1986).
    H) SKIN CARCINOMA
    1) There was reported a slight increase in melanoma of the skin in men occupationally exposed to PCBs (Deichmann, 1981). A study of 3569 workers in an electrical capacitor manufacturing plant exposed to PCB, reported that those working with PCB >/= 90 days had an elevated incidence of death due to melanoma (Ruder et al, 2006).
    I) NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
    1) A population-based case-control study examined the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and exposure to organochlorines in carpet dust in 603 cases and 443 controls. There was an excess risk observed if any of the PCB congeners (105, 138, 153, 170, 180) was detected (odds ratio 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0). For PCB 180, risk was elevated in the top tertile (1.7; 1.1 to 2.6) and in the 2 top tertiles for all PCBs (middle tertile 1.6 [1.1 to 2.4]; top tertile 1.5 [1.0 to 2.2]). Congeners with the highest odds ratios were PCB 153, 170 and 180. If DDE was detected in the dust, there was a 30% elevation in NHL risk (Colt et al, 2005).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) The US EPA considers there to be a "sufficient" level of carcinogenic evidence for PCBs in experimental animals (Clayton & Clayton, 1994; HSDB , 2000). PCBs are considered to be equivocal tumorigenic or carcinogenic agents in experimental animals by RTECS criteria (RTECS , 2000). Animal studies have shown increased numbers of hepatocarcinomas, pituitary tumors, leukemias and lymphomas, and gastrointestinal tract tumors during exposures to PCBs (Letz et al, 1990).
    2) FIREMASTER FF-1 administered by gavage produced neoplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas in female Sherman rats; produced neoplastic nodules, hepatocellular carcinomas, and chloangiocarcinomas in Fisher 344 rats; and produced hepatocellular carcinomas in B6C3F1 mice of both sexes (Sittig, 1991).
    3) NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Study (US Dept Health & Human Services, 1993) has concluded the following:
    a) CONCLUSION (Adult-Only Exposure): Under the conditions of these 2-year, adult-only, dietary exposure studies, there was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity for PBBs in male and female F344/N rats and male and female B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms.
    b) CONCLUSION (Perinatal-Only Exposure): Perinatal exposure alone (through dietary administration of 10:0 ppm PBBs to the dams) had no effect on the incidences of neoplasms in female F344/N rats, but in male F344/N rats, perinatal exposure was associated with a marginally increased incidence of hepatocellular adenomas that may have been related to chemical administration.
    1) In male and female B6C3F1 mice, perinatal exposure to 30:0 ppm polybrominated biphenyls resulted in significantly increased incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms. The incidences of a number of non-neoplastic lesions in the liver (cytomegaly, eosinophilic focus, and clear cell focus) were increased in male and female B6C3F1 mice.
    c) CONCLUSION (Combined Perinatal and Adult Exposure): Combined perinatal and adult dietary exposure to PBBs confirmed the findings of the adult-only exposures for the increased incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
    1) In male F344/N rats, there were no enhancing effects of combined perinatal and adult exposure. However, perinatal exposure enhanced the susceptibility of female F344/N rats receiving adult exposure of 10 or 30 ppm to the induction of liver neoplasms.
    2) For male and female F344/N rats, a combined analysis of the incidences of leukemia in the adult-only, perinatal-only, and combined perinatal and adult exposure groups revealed an apparent association between increasing incidences of mononuclear cell leukemia and exposure to PBBs.
    3) In male and female B6C3F1 mice, it was not possible to adequately assess the enhancing effects of combined perinatal and adult exposure on hepatocellular neoplasms, because adult-only exposure to 10 or 30 ppm PBBs resulted in high incidences (84 to 98 percent) of liver neoplasms.
    a) However, with increased perinatal exposure, there were increases in the numbers of B6C3F1 mice with hepatocellular carcinomas and in the numbers of B6C3F1 mice with multiple hepatocellular adenomas, which suggests an enhancement of PBBs-related hepatocellular carcinogenicity associated with perinatal exposure.
    B) PULMONARY CARCINOMA
    1) Aroclor 1254 promoted lung and liver tumors induced by N-dimethylnitrosamine in Swiss mice (Anderson et al, 1994).

Genotoxicity

    A) DNA damage, inhibition of DNA synthesis, and unscheduled DNA synthesis have occurred in experimental animals. Mutations have been observed in mouse cells. Morphological transformation has occurred in hamster embryos.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) The background level of PCBs in blood is approximately 20 ppb.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) National surveys indicate blood levels of approximately 0.3 micrograms per 100 mL for non-occupationally exposed populations (Zenz, 1994) or approximately 20 ppb for background level (Letz, 1983).
    a) Plasma PCB levels that exceed 2 to 4 micrograms per liter are indicative of significant exposure to PCB, with 200 micrograms per liter of blood as an upper acceptable limit for occupationally exposed individuals (Baselt, 1997). Up to 2000 milligrams per liter of blood has been reported in occupationally exposed workers (Zenz, 1994).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) A small number of patients accidentally exposed to PCBs in a transformer fire were found to have slightly elevated urinary uroporphyrin levels and slightly decreased coproporphyrin levels (Osterloh et al, 1987).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) OTHER
    a) Most adipose tissue samples contain PCBs at levels less than 1 milligram per kilogram for nonexposed subjects, in contrast to 700 milligram per kilogram for occupationally exposed workers (Zenz, 1994).
    1) Lemesh (1992) recommends quantification of PCBs in neutral fat (subcutaneous abdominal fat biopsy) in order to estimate exposure to PCBs. Pharmacokinetic data from animal models indicate that PCBs are rapidly cleared from the blood and distributed to organs of high lipid content.
    b) In contrast, chronic intoxications of PCBs are likely to be continually released from adipose stores, and may result in transiently increased blood levels.
    c) Background level in human milk is approximately 40 to 100 ppb (Letz, 1983).
    d) Schilling et al (1988) studied serum PCB levels in pet dogs living near restricted areas with average soil levels of 9,000 ppm as compared to levels in dogs from other areas. They found that dogs living near contaminated sites had higher serum PCB concentrations than controls, and suggested that dogs may serve as sentinels of human exposure to environmental PCBs.

Methods

    A) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry may be used to determine PCBs in a sample (Hammond, 1972; Bell et al, 1994), as may gas chromatography-hydrogen flame ionization detection (Parker et al, 1983).
    2) Furst et al (1994) describe a high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) method for the determination of PCB congeners in human milk.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) The background level of PCBs in blood is approximately 20 ppb.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) SUMMARY -
    1) In almost all cases, ingestions of PCBs or PBBs will not be recognized until long after gastric decontamination would be of any value. Vomiting of the pure substance may cause aspiration, so emesis would be contraindicated.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) EMESIS
    1) In almost all cases, ingestions of PCBs or PBBs will not be recognized until long after emesis would be of any value. In the unlikely event that an individual would ingest pure substance, the value of using emesis to remove a substance with low acute toxicity but potentially high aspiration risks must be considered.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) The value of administering activated charcoal for an acute, known ingestion is unknown. Activated charcoal is a fairly benign treatment, and therefore, should considered after acute ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) There is little specific treatment. Patients should be monitored for increased hepatic enzymes, chloracne, and the nonspecific eye, gastrointestinal, and neurologic symptoms seen in the Yusho poisonings.
    B) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) Tretjak et al (1990) reported the mobilization of PCB from the body by means of a detoxification program consisting of daily aerobic exercises followed by frequent periods of low-heat (60 to 80 degrees C) sauna, niacin and polyunsaturated oil (to sustain mobilization and elimination), vitamin and mineral replacements, and maintenance of body weight. This technique was adapted to a symptomatic woman occupationally exposed to PCB over several years.
    2) Levels of PCB in serum, fat and breast discharge decreased during 23 days of this therapy. No baseline data were obtained to determine change in PCB levels before therapy. Reproducibility of the assay employed to determine PCB levels was not reported.

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) Post contamination washing cannot be assumed to remove PCBs. In animal studies only 59% of applied PCBs were removed from the skin with immediate washings with water and acetone, and only 1% was removed by washing 24 hours after exposure (Wester et al, 1983). Multiple soap and water washings are necessary.

Case Reports

    A) SPECIFIC AGENT
    1) Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) were accidentally used in an agricultural food supplement in Michigan. Although PBB levels have been noted in children and adults of this area, no toxic effects have yet been seen (Rogan, 1980; Rogan et al, 1983).
    B) ADULT
    1) Fourteen firemen who were exposed to PCBs and their pyrolysis products during a transformer fire were evaluated six months post-exposure. All 14 were judged to have neurobehavioral, cognitive, and memory impairment. The patients were "detoxified" with diet, exercise, and sauna baths, and were said to be "significantly improved" when retested six weeks later (Kilburn et al, 1989).

Summary

    A) Toxicity of the compounds may vary by impurities present. Polychlorinated dibenzofurans and other highly toxic compounds have been found as contaminants. Symptoms are expected after a minimal oral intake of 500 mg. In the Yusho experience, the average Japanese intake was 72.4 mcg/day.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The minimum lethal human dose to this agent has not been delineated.
    2) CARCINOGENICITY - Polychlorinated biphenyls are classified as Group 2A carcinogens. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), there is Human Limited Evidence and Animal Sufficient Evidence to term polychlorinated biphenyls carcinogenic (Lewis, 1996; RTECS , 1999).
    3) Even though there are no reported deaths of humans due to a single ingestion, experiments in animals suggest that ingestion of 6 to 10 fluid ounces can cause death to a 150 pound adult (Sittig, 1991).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The estimated minimal oral intake per day for normal US citizens is 200 micrograms/kilogram of body weight. It is estimated that 36 percent of the population has levels of 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram (wet weight of PCB in adipose tissue) (Deichmann, 1981). Symptoms are expected after a minimum oral intake of 500 milligrams.
    2) In the Yusho experience, the average Japanese intake was 72.4 micrograms/day (Deichmann, 1981). The attack rate for those who ingested a total of less than 720 milliliters of oil was 88 percent, and was 100 percent when over 720 milliliters was ingested. The average PCB contamination of the oil was 2,000 to 3,000 ppm (this is equivalent to 1,800 milligrams for 720 milliliters of oil) (Kuratsune et al, 1972).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS11097-69-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine)
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.5 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A3
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) A3: Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to Humans: The agent is carcinogenic in experimental animals at a relatively high dose, by route(s) of administration, at site(s), of histologic type(s), or by mechanism(s) that may not be relevant to worker exposure. Available epidemiologic studies do not confirm an increased risk of cancer in exposed humans. Available evidence does not suggest that the agent is likely to cause cancer in humans except under uncommon or unlikely routes or levels of exposure.
    b) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): URT irr; liver dam; chloracne
    d) Molecular Weight: 328.4
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS53469-21-9 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine)
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 1 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): Liver dam; eye irr; chloracne
    d) Molecular Weight: 266.5
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    C) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS67774-32-7 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    D) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS59536-65-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    E) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS1336-36-3 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    F) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS11097-69-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine)
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 0.001 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Ca) NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s): See Appendix A; [*Note: The REL also applies to other PCBs.]
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 5 mg/m3
    b) Note(s): Ca
    1) Ca: NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A).

    G) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS53469-21-9 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine)
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 0.001 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Ca) NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s): See Appendix A; [*Note: The REL also applies to other PCBs.]
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 5 mg/m3
    b) Note(s): Ca
    1) Ca: NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A).

    H) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS67774-32-7 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    I) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS59536-65-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    J) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS1336-36-3 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    K) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS11097-69-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A3 ; Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine)
    a) A3 :Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to Humans: The agent is carcinogenic in experimental animals at a relatively high dose, by route(s) of administration, at site(s), of histologic type(s), or by mechanism(s) that may not be relevant to worker exposure. Available epidemiologic studies do not confirm an increased risk of cancer in exposed humans. Available evidence does not suggest that the agent is likely to cause cancer in humans except under uncommon or unlikely routes or levels of exposure.
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Assessed under the IRIS program. ; Listed as: Aroclor 1254
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Ca ; Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine)
    a) Ca : NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Chlorinated biphenyls (technical products)
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    L) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS53469-21-9 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine)
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Ca ; Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine)
    a) Ca : NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Chlorinated biphenyls (technical products)
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    M) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS67774-32-7 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    N) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS59536-65-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 2A ; Listed as: Polybrominated biphenyls [Firemaster BP-6]
    a) 2A : The agent (mixture) is probably carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are probably carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some cases, an agent (mixture) may be classified in this category when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence that the carcinogenesis is mediated by a mechanism that also operates in humans. Exceptionally, an agent, mixture or exposure circumstance may be classified in this category solely on the basis of limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans.
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    O) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS1336-36-3 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    3) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    4) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    5) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    6) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    7) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    8) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 1 ; Listed as: Polychlorinated biphenyls
    a) 1 : The agent (mixture) is carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are carcinogenic to humans. This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent (mixture) may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent (mixture) acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.
    9) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    10) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    11) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): R ; Listed as: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
    a) R : RAHC = Reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen

    P) OSHA PEL Values for CAS11097-69-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (54% Chlorine) (PCB)
    2) Table Z-1 for Chlorodiphenyl (54% Chlorine) (PCB):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 0.5
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: Yes
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

    Q) OSHA PEL Values for CAS53469-21-9 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Chlorodiphenyl (42% Chlorine) (PCB)
    2) Table Z-1 for Chlorodiphenyl (42% Chlorine) (PCB):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 1
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: Yes
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

    R) OSHA PEL Values for CAS67774-32-7 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    S) OSHA PEL Values for CAS59536-65-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    T) OSHA PEL Values for CAS1336-36-3 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) FIREMASTER BP-6: References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    B) FIREMASTER FF-1: References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    C) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 1900 mg/kg
    D) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 4250 mg/kg
    b) 0.794-1.269 g/kg
    2) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    a) 10 mg/m(3)
    E) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 880 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 1010 mg/kg
    b) Weanling, 1.295 g/kg -- Sherman strain
    c) 1.3 g/kg -- Wistar, 30-day-old
    d) 1.4 g/kg -- Wistar, 60-day-old
    e) 2.0 g/kg -- Wistar, 120-day-old
    F) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 1100 mg/kg
    G) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 1600 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 1100 mg/kg
    H) References: Lewis, 1996 RTECS, 2000 HSDB, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) > 15 g/kg -- behavioral, hepatic, and dermal effects
    2) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 21500 mg/kg

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) The exact mechanism of action by which PCBs cause their toxicity is unclear. They are potent enzyme inducers, and affect thiamine utilization.

Physical Characteristics

    A) PCBs are generally present as colorless to yellow mobile oily liquids, yellow to black noncrystalline resins, or white to yellow crystals (Lewis, 1996; NFPA, 1997). The odor of polychlorinated biphenyls ranges from practically odorless to a mild aromatic odor (HSDB , 2000).
    1) Aroclor 1242 is a mobile liquid (HSDB , 2000; Sittig, 1991).
    2) Aroclor 1254 is a viscous liquid (HSDB , 2000; Sittig, 1991).
    B) Hexabromobiphenyl is a white solid (HSDB , 2000).

Ph

    1) No information found at the time of this review.

Molecular Weight

    A) 291.98-360.86 (HSDB , 2000)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Exposives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1996.
    14) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    15) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    16) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    17) Anderson LM, Logsdon D, & Ruskie S: Promotion by polychlorinated biphenyls of lung and liver tumors in mice. Carcinogenesis 1994; 15:2245-2248.
    18) Andres J, Lambert I, & Robertson L: The comparative biologic and toxic properties of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominate biphenyls. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983; 70:204-215.
    19) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    20) Arnold DL, Mes J, & Bryce F: A pilot study on the effects of aroclor 1254 ingestion by rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys as a model for human ingestion of PCBs. Food Chem Toxicol 1990; 28:847-857.
    21) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 4th ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, IL, 1995.
    22) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, PSG Publishing Company, Littleton, MA, 1997.
    23) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    24) Bell FP, Iverson F, & Arnold D: Long-term effects of Arochlor 1254 (PCBs) on plasma lipid and carnitine concentrations in rhesus monkey. Toxicology 1994; 89:139-153.
    25) Benfenati E, Valzacchi S, & Mariani G: PCDD, PCDF, PCB, PAH, cadmium and lead in roadside soil -- relationship between road distance and concentration. Chemosphere 1992; 24:1077-1083.
    26) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    27) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    28) Bidleman TF, Cotham WE, & Addison RF: Organic contaminants in the Northwest Atlantic atmosphere at Sable Island, Nova-Scotia, 1988-89. Chemosphere 1992; 24:1389-1412.
    29) Blanck HM, Marcus M, & Hertzberg V: Determinants of polybrominated biphenyl serum decay among women in the Michigan PBB cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108:147-152.
    30) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    31) Buck Louis GM, Weiner JM, Whitcomb BW, et al: Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis. Human Reprod 2005; 20(1):279-285.
    32) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    33) Busbee DL & Ziprin RL: Gastrointestinal uptake and vascular transport of 2,4-dichlorobiphenyl. Arch Toxicol 1994; 68:96-102.
    34) CCOHS: Safety Infogram; K11 PPE -- Chemical Protective Gloves, Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, Hamilton, Ontario, 1989.
    35) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    36) Chapatwala KD, Babu GR, & Nawaz MS: Degradation of acetonitrile and biphenyl compounds by a mixed microbial culture. Environ Toxicol Chem 1992; 11:1145-1151.
    37) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    38) Chen JJ & Gaylor DW: Correlations of developmental end points observed after 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid exposure in mice. Teratology 1992; 45:241-246.
    39) Chen RC, Tang SY, & Miyata H: Polychlorinated biphenyl poisoning: correlation of sensory and motor nerve conduction, neurologic symptoms, and blood levels of polychlorinated biphenyls, quaterphenyls, and dibenzofurans. Environ Res 1985; 37:340-348.
    40) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    41) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2B, Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981.
    42) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2D. Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    43) Collier TK, Stein JE, & Sanborn HR: Field studies of reproductive success and bioindicators of maternal contaminant exposure in English Sole (Parophrys vetulus). Sci Total Environ 1992; 116:169-185.
    44) Colt JS, Severson RK, Lubin J, et al: Organochlorines in carpet dust and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Epidemiology 2005; 16(4):516-525.
    45) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    46) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    47) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    48) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    49) Dally S, Conso F, & Falcy M: Accidental exposure to chlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxins (PCDDs) following a transformer fire. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29 (Suppl 2):128-129.
    50) Darolova A & Breyl I: Polychlorinated biphenyl levels in eggs of Larus ridibundus, Riparia riparia, Lanius collurio and Carduelis chloris from selected sites in Slovakia. Folia Zool 1994; 43:231-236.
    51) Deichmann WB: Halogenated cyclic hydrocarbons, in: Clayton GD & Clayton FE (Eds), Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1981, pp 3645-3669.
    52) Denham M, Schell LM, Deane G, et al: Relationship of lead, mercury, mirex, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, hexachlorobenzene, and polychlorinated biphenyls to timing of menarche among Akwesasne Mohawk girls. Pediatrics 2005; 115(2):127-134.
    53) Dewailly E, Ryan JJ, & Laliberte C: Exposure of remote maritime populations to coplanar PCBs. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 1994; 102 (Suppl 1):205-209.
    54) Dragun J: The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, 1988.
    55) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    56) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    57) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    58) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    59) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    60) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    61) Emmett EA, Maroni M, & Jefferys J: Studies of transformer repair workers exposed to PCBs: II. Results of clinical laboratory investigations. Am J Ind Med 1988; 14:47-62.
    62) Endo F, Monsees TK, Akaza H, et al: Effects of single non-ortho, mono-ortho, and di-ortho chlorinated biphenyls on cell functions and proliferation of the human prostatic carcinoma cell line, LNCaP. Reprod Toxicol 2003; 17(2):229-236.
    63) Eschenroeder AQ, Doyle CP, & Faeder EJ: Health risks of PCB spills from electrical equipment. Risk Analysis 1986; 6:213-221.
    64) Eyster JT, Humphrey HB, & Kimbrough RD: Partitioning of polybrominated biphenyls (PBB's) in serum, adipose tissue, breast milk, placenta, cord blood, biliary fluid and feces. Arch Environ Health 1983; 38:47-53.
    65) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    66) Falandysz J & Kannan K: Organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in slaughtered and game animal fats from the northern part of Poland. Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel - Untersuchung und - Forschung 1992; 195:17-21.
    67) Fierens S, Mairesse H, Jean-Francois H, et al: Dioxin/polychlorinated biphenyl body burden, diabetes and endometriosis: findings in a population-based study in Belgium. Biomarkers 2003; 8(6):529-534.
    68) Finkel AJ: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wright, PSG, Inc, Boston, MA, 1983.
    69) Fischbein A, Rizzo JN, & Solomon SJ: Oculodermatological findings in workers with occupational exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Br J Ind Med 1985; 42:426-430.
    70) Fitzpatrick LC, Sassani R, & Venables BJ: Comparative toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls to earthworms eisenia-foetida and lumbricus terrestris. Environ Pollut 1992; 77:65-69.
    71) Freeman HM: Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1989.
    72) Furst P, Furst C, & Wilmers K: Human milk as a bioindicator for body burden of PCDDs, PCDFs, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 1994; 102(Suppl 1):187-193.
    73) Gladen BC, Rogan WJ, & Hardy P: Development after exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene transplacentally and through human milk. J Pediatr 1988; 113:991-995.
    74) Gladen BC, Taylor JS, & Wu YC: Dermatological findings in children exposed transplacentally to heat-degraded polychlorinated biphenyls in Taiwan. Br J Dermatol 1990; 122:799-808.
    75) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    76) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    77) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    78) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    79) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    80) Guo YL, Lambert GH, Hsu CC, et al: Yucheng: health effects of prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dibenzofurans. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004; 77:153-158.
    81) Guo YL, Lin CJ, & Yao WJ: Musculoskeletal changes in children prenatally exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls and related compounds (Yu-Cheng children). J Toxicol Environ Health 1994; 41:83-93.
    82) Gustavsson P, Hogstedt C, & Rappe C: Short-term mortality and cancer incidence in capacitor manufacturing workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Am J Ind Med 1986; 10:341-344.
    83) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    84) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    85) Hammond AL: Chemical pollution: polychlorinated biphenyls. Science 1972; 175:155-156.
    86) Harbison RM: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    87) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    88) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    89) Havel J & Reineke W: Degradation of Aroclor 1221 and survival of strains in soil microcosms. App Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 38:129-134.
    90) Hawari J, Demeter A, & Samson R: Sensitized photolysis of polychlorobiphenyls in alkaline 2-propanol -- dechlorination of Aroclor 1254 in soil samples by solar radiation. Environ Sci Technol 1992; 26:2022-2027.
    91) Heilmann C, Grandjean P, Weihe P, et al: Reduced antibody responses to vaccinations in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls. PLoS Med 2006; 3(8):e311-.
    92) Hertz-Picciotto I, Charles MJ, James RA, et al: In utero polychlorinated biphenyl exposures in relation to fetal and early childhood growth. Epidemiology 2005; 16(5):648-656.
    93) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    94) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    95) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    96) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    97) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    98) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    99) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    100) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    101) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    102) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    103) Jacobson JL & Jacobson SW: Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero. New Engl J Med 1996; 335:783-789.
    104) Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, & Humphrey HEB: Effects of in utero exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and related contaminants on cognitive functioning in young children. J Pediatr 1990; 116:38-45.
    105) Jensen S, Eriksson G, & Kylin H: Atmospheric pollution by persistent organic compounds -- monitoring with pine needles. Chemosphere 1992; 24:229-245.
    106) Johansen HR, Becher G, & Polder A: Congener-specific determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in human milk from Norwegian mothers living in Oslo. J Toxicol Environ Health 1994; 42:157-171.
    107) Kannan K, Falandysz J, & Yamashita N: Temporal trends of organochlorine concentrations in cod-liver oil from the southern baltic proper, 1971-1989. Marine Poll Bull 1992; 24:358-363.
    108) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    109) Karara AH & Mcfarland VA: A pharmacokinetic analysis of the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by golden shiners. Environ Toxicol Chem 1992; 11:315-320.
    110) Kilburn KH, Warsaw RH, & Shields MG: Neurobehavioral dysfunction in firemen exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): possible improvement after detoxification. Arch Environ Health 1989; 44:345-350.
    111) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    112) Knickmeyer R, Landgraff O, & Steinhart H: Cyclic organochlorines in the sea star asterias-rubens from the German Bight, December 1988 May 1989. Marine Environ Res 1992; 33:127-143.
    113) Knulst JCC: Effects of pH and humus on the availability of 2,2',4,4,5,5'-Hexachlorobiphenyl-C-14 in lake water. Environ Toxicol Chemistry 1992; 11:1209-1216.
    114) Kuratsune M, Yoshimura T, & Matsuzaka J: Epidemiologic study on Yusho, a poisoning caused by ingestion of rice oil contaminated with a commercial brand of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ Health Perspect 1972; 1:119-128.
    115) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    116) Landrigan PJ, Wilcox KR Jr, & Silva J Jr: Cohort study of Michigan residents exposed to polybrominated biphenyls: epidemiologic and immunologic findings. Ann Acad Sci 1979; 320:284.
    117) Letz G, Wabeke R, & Weinstein R: Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) toxicity. J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1990; 28:505-526.
    118) Letz G: The toxicology of PCB's -- an overview for clinicians. West J Med 1983; 138:534-540.
    119) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    120) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    121) Lopezmartin JM, Ruizolmo J, & Borrell A: Levels of organochlorine compounds in freshwater fish from Catalonia, NE Spain. Chemosphere 1995; 31:3523-3535.
    122) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    123) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    124) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    125) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    126) Mattison DR & Cullen MR: Disorders of reproduction and development, in: Rosenstock L & Cullen MR (Eds), Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine, WB Saunders, Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1994, pp 446-468.
    127) Mayes BA, McConnell EE, & Neal BH: Comparative carcinogenicity in Sprague-Dawley rats of the polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures Aroclors 1016, 1242, 1254, and 1260. Toxicol Sci 1998; 41:62-76.
    128) McCoy G, Finlay MF, & Rhone A: Chronic polychlorinated biphenyls exposure on three generations of oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus): effects on reproduction, growth, and body residues. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1995; 28:431-435.
    129) McKinney JD, Korach KS, & McLachlan JA: Detoxification of polychlorinated biphenyls (Letter). Lancet 1990; 335:222-223.
    130) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    131) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    132) Morris PJ, Mohn WW, & Quensen JF: Establishment of a polychlorinated biphenyl-degrading enrichment culture with predominantly metadechlorination. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58:3088-3094.
    133) Murai K, Okamura K, & Tsuji H: Thyroid function in "Yusho" patients exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB). Environ Res 1987; 44:179-187.
    134) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 12th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1997.
    135) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    136) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    137) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    138) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    139) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    140) Nakajima S, Saijo Y, Kato S, et al: Effects of prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins on mental and motor development in Japanese children at 6 months of age. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114(5):773-778.
    141) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    142) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    143) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    144) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    145) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    146) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    147) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    148) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    216) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    217) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    218) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    219) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    220) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    221) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    222) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    223) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    224) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    225) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    226) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    227) Osterloh J, Cone J, & Harrison R: Pilot survey of urinary porphyrins from persons transiently exposed to a PCB transformer fire. Clin Toxicol 1987; 24:533-544.
    228) Parker CE, Albro PW, & Bobanrieth MJ: Quantitation of halogenated aromatic compounds by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 1983; 278:1-11.
    229) Patandin S, Lanting CI, & Mulder GH: Effects of environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins on cognitive abilities in Dutch children at 42 months of age. J Pediatr 1999; 134:33-41.
    230) Phillips DL, Smith AB, & Burse VW: Half-life of polychlorinated biphenyls in occupationally exposed workers. Arch Environ Health 1989; 44:351-354.
    231) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    232) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    233) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    234) Prince MM, Hein MJ, Ruder AM, et al: Update: cohort mortality study of workers highly exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) during the manufacture of electrical capacitors, 1940-1998. Environ Health 2006; 5:13-.
    235) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    236) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    237) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    238) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    239) Rogan WJ, Gladen BC, & Hung K: Congenital poisoning by polychlorinated biphenyls and their contaminants in Taiwan. Science 1988; 241:334-336.
    240) Rogan WJ, Gladen BC, & McKinney JD: Chromatographic evidence of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure from a spill. JAMA 1983; 249:1057-1058.
    241) Rogan WJ, Gladen BC, & McKinney JD: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethene (DDE) in human milk: effects of maternal factors and previous lactation. Am J Public Health 1986; 76:172-177.
    242) Rogan WJ: The sources and routes of childhood chemical exposures. J Pediatr 1980; 97:861-865.
    243) Ruder AM, Hein MJ, Nilsen N, et al: Mortality among workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in an electrical capacitor manufacturing plant in Indiana: an update. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114(1):18-23.
    244) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    245) Sager DB & Girard DM: Long-term effects on reproductive parameters in female rats after translactational exposure to PCBs. Environ Res 1994; 66:52-76.
    246) Sauer PJJ, Huisman M, & Koopman-Esseboom C: Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins on growth and development. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:900-906.
    247) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 7th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1989.
    248) Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects, 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY, 1993.
    249) Schecter A, Stanley J, & Boggess K: Polychlorinated biphenyl levels in the tissues of exposed and nonexposed humans. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 1994; 102 (Suppl 1):149-158.
    250) Scheele J, Teufel M, & Niessen KH: Chlorinated hydrocarbons in the bone marrow of children: studies on their association with leukaemia. Eur J Pediatr 1992; 151:802-805.
    251) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    252) Shalat SL, True LD, & Fleming LE: Kidney cancer in utility workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Br J Ind Med 1989; 46:823-824.
    253) Shields PG, Whysner JA, & Chase KA: Polychlorinated biphenyls and other polyhalogenated hydrocarbons, in: Sullivan JB & Krieger GR (Eds), Hazardous Materials Toxicology: Clinical Principles of Environmental Health, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1992, pp 748-755.
    254) Shirota M, Mukai M, Sakurada Y, et al: Effects of Vertically Transferred 3,3',4,4',5-Pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126) on the Reproductive Development of Female Rats. J Reprod Dev 2006; Epub:1-.
    255) Sijm DTHM, Seinen W, & Opperhulzen A: Life-cycle biomagnification study in fish. Environ Sci Technol 1992; 26:2162-2174.
    256) Sinks T, Steele G, & Smith AB: Mortality among workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136:389-398.
    257) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, Vols 1-2, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    258) Skerfving S, Svensson BG, & Asplund L: Exposure to mixtures and congeners of polychlorinated biphenyls. Clin Chem 1994; 40:1409-1415.
    259) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    260) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    261) Tenhulscher TEM, Vandervelde LE, & Bruggeman WA: Temperature dependence of Henry law constants for selected chlorobenzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 1992; 11:1595-1603.
    262) Terrell ML, Hartnett KP, Lim H, et al: Maternal exposure to brominated flame retardants and infant Apgar scores. Chemosphere 2015; 118:178-186.
    263) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    264) Thomas DR, Carswell KS, & Georgiou G: Mineralization of biphenyl and PCBs by the white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992; 40:1395-1402.
    265) Tillitt DE, Ankley GT, & Giesy JP: Polychlorinated biphenyl residues and egg mortality in double-crested cormorants from the great lakes. Environ Toxicol Chem 1992; 11:1281-1288.
    266) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    267) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    268) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    269) Tretjak Z, Shields M, & Beckmann SL: PCB reduction and clinical improvement by detoxification: an unexploited approach?. Human Exp Toxicol 1990; 9:235-244.
    270) Tsukino H, Hanaoka T, Sasaki H, et al: Associations between serum levels of selected organochlorine compounds and endometriosis in infertile Japanese women. Environ Res 2005; 99(1):118-125.
    271) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    272) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    273) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    274) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    275) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    276) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    277) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    278) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    279) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    280) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    281) Wasserman M, Wassermann D, & Cucos S: World PCB's map: storage and effects in man and his biologic environment in the 1970's. Ann Acad Sci 1979; 320:69-124.
    282) Weil WB, Spencer M, & Benjamin D: The effect of polybrominated biphenyl on infants and young children. J Pediatr 1981; 98:47-57.
    283) Weisskopf MG, Anderson HA, & Hanrahan LP: Decreased sex ratio following maternal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls from contaminated Great Lakes sport-caught fish: a retrospective cohort study. Environ Health 2003; 2(1):2-.
    284) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    285) Wester RC, Bucks AW, & Maibach HI: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's): dermal absorption, systemic elimination, and dermal wash efficiency. J Toxicol Environ Health 1983; 12:511-519.
    286) Wickizer TM & Brilliant LB: Test for polychlorinated biphenyls in human milk. Pediatrics 1981; 68:411-415.
    287) Williams LL & Giesy JP: Relationships among concentrations of individual polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents (TCDD-EQ), and rearing mortality of chinook salmon (oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs from Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 1992; 18:108-124.
    288) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    289) Yassi A, Tate R, & Fish D: Cancer mortality in workers employed at a transformer manufacturing plant. Am J Ind Med 1994; 25:425-437.
    290) Zabik ME, Harte JB, & Zabik MJ: Effect of preparation and cooking on contaminant distributions in crustaceans -- PCBs in blue crab. J Agricul Food Chem 1992; 40:1197-1203.
    291) Zenz C: Occupational Medicine, 3rd ed, Mosby - Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, MO, 1994.
    292) d'Argy R, Dencker L, & Klasson-Wehler E: 3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl in pregnant mice: embryotoxicity, teratogenicity, and toxic effects on the cultured embryonic thymus. Pharmacol Toxicol 1987; 61:53-57.