MOBILE VIEW  | 

PARIS GREEN

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Paris Green is an inorganic trivalent arsenic compound.

Specific Substances

    A) No Synonyms were found in group or single elements
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C4-H6-As6-Cu4-O16

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Paris Green is an inorganic trivalent arsenic compound which also contains copper (Morgan, 1989). It is an odorless, emerald green-colored, crystalline powder (Budavari, 1989; Sax & Lewis, 1987; EPA, 1985). It is soluble in ammonium hydroxide and insoluble in cold water and alcohol (HSDB , 1993).
    2) The ACGIH has established a Biological Exposure Index (BEI) for arsenic. Refer to the BIOMONITORING section for more information.
    3) This review is based on the effects of arsenic and its inorganic compounds in general. Effects attributed specifically to Paris Green are identified. The toxicology of arsenic and its compounds has been reviewed (Friberg et al, 1986).
    B) USES
    1) Paris Green was extensively used in the past as an insecticide, wood preservative, and pigment (particularly for marine anti-fouling paints) and has also been used as an anthelmintic and larvicide (EPA, 1985; Sax & Lewis, 1987; HSDB , 1993). It is not currently used in the USA (Morgan, 1989).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) Paris Green is an inorganic trivalent arsenic compound which also contains copper. It is an emerald green colored, crystalline powder. Although some absorption may occur from dermal contact or inhalation, most poisonings result from ingestion. Upper respiratory tract irritation may result from inhalation exposure.
    1) Direct contact may produce conjunctival irritation or a characteristic dermatitis. Other skin findings may be melanosis, hyperkeratosis and hyperhidrosis. Hair loss and trophic nail changes may also occur with chronic exposure.
    B) Systemic Paris Green poisoning is primarily due to the arsenic content, and is not different from any other arsenic poisoning. Chronic copper poisoning from Paris Green exposure is essentially unknown in humans. It is advisable to treat all arsenic compounds as highly toxic.
    C) Multiple keratoses, chronic lymphatic leukemia and macular degeneration have been tied to occupational exposure.
    D) Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces symptoms within 30 to 60 minutes, but onset may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. A metallic or garlic taste, vomiting, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and profuse watery (rice-water-like) and sometimes bloody diarrhea may occur. Dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are common. Hypovolemia from capillary leaking ("third spacing" of fluids) is a common early sign.
    E) Systemic arsenic poisoning from occupational exposure is uncommon. Arsenic workers have developed a hoarse voice; nasal irritation and possible perforation of the nasal septum; irritation of eyes, skin, and mucous membranes; and, rarely, cirrhosis of the liver. Nausea and vomiting are infrequent. Painful ulceration of the wrist and scrotal skin, lips, and nostrils may develop with dust exposure.
    F) The primary target organs initially are the gastrointestinal tract, heart, brain, and kidneys. Seizures and pulkonary edema can result from exposure. Eventually, the skin, bone marrow, and peripheral nervous system may be significantly damaged. The peripheral neuropathy appears similar regardless of the route of exposure.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Patients may rapidly become hypotensive. Tachycardia may develop secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic or anxiety.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) Conjunctivitis, photophobia, dimness of vision, diplopia, and lacrimation may occur. A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Upper respiratory tract irritation and hoarse voice may result. Acute respiratory failure was seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning. Pulmonary edema may occur and be life-threatening. Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are possible complications. Peripheral neuropathy is common. Seizures may occur.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery ("rice-water-like") diarrhea, pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin.
    0.2.9) HEPATIC
    A) Hepatocellular damage may occur, but is not common. A common post-mortem finding is mitotic activity of hepatocytes.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria, acute tubular necrosis, renal failure, and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) Electrolyte imbalances may occur.
    0.2.13) HEMATOLOGIC
    A) Hemolysis, pancytopenia, isolated leukopenia, or anemia may occur.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Common skin findings may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation, and exfoliative dermatitis. Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen. Shingles (Herpes Zoster) may also be a complication.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Trivalent arsenicals have caused teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in the offspring of pregnant mice, rats, and hamsters when administered orally or parenterally. Fetotoxicity and fetal death are possible, but arsenic is NOT likely to be a significant risk to human reproduction at permissible occupational exposure limits.
    B) Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans.
    C) Systemic toxicity was present before any effects were noted on the testes.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) An IARC review linked arsenic to skin cancer and a greater risk of lung cancer. OSHA has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow. Bladder, kidney, prostate, liver, breast and colon cancer have also been linked with arsenic exposure.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION - Aggressive decontamination with gastric lavage is recommended. If x-ray demonstrates arsenic in the lower GI tract, whole bowel irrigation should be considered. Activated charcoal may not bind significant amounts of arsenic, but is recommended until definitive quantitative data are available. Fluid repletion should be begun as soon as possible.
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE: Consider after ingestion of a potentially life-threatening amount of poison if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 1 hour). Protect airway by placement in the head down left lateral decubitus position or by endotracheal intubation. Control any seizures first.
    1) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    C) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer charcoal as a slurry (240 mL water/30 g charcoal). Usual dose: 25 to 100 g in adults/adolescents, 25 to 50 g in children (1 to 12 years), and 1 g/kg in infants less than 1 year old.
    D) MONITOR LIVER, RENAL, AND CARDIAC FUNCTIONS.
    1) Maintain high urine output.
    E) ALKALINIZATION OF THE URINE
    1) May prevent the deposition of red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in the renal tubules.
    F) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    1) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    2) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    G) CHELATION
    1) BAL - Symptomatic patients should be treated with BAL 3 to 5 mg/kg/dose IM every 4 to 12 hours. The dose and frequency depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Higher doses of BAL invariably cause adverse effects.
    2) PENICILLAMINE - As symptoms and signs subside, change to oral D-penicillamine 100 mg/kg/day up to 2 g daily in four divided doses. If allergic to penicillamine, administer BAL for 5 days with tapering of the dose. In severely ill patients, combined therapy with both BAL and D-penicillamine should be considered.
    3) ENDPOINT - Chelation therapy should be stopped when the urinary arsenic level falls below 50 mcg per 24 hours. If renal failure exists, dose of either chelator should be adjusted downward after loading dose.
    4) DMSA - Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is a chelator currently approved for the treatment of pediatric lead poisoning in the United States. It may be more effective and cause fewer side effects than BAL.
    H) FLUID/ELECTROLYTES - Monitor volume status; establish adequate urine flow of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hr.
    I) RADIOGRAPHY - Arsenic is radiopaque. Obtain abdominal film and repeat as necessary to ensure that gastric emptying maneuvers have been effective. A chest radiograph should also be obtained, as pulmonary edema may occur.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    B) Alkalinization of the urine may prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in renal tubular cells.
    1) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    a) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    b) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    C) Chelation therapy may be indicated at a urine arsenic level of 200 mcg/liter or higher. Dimercaprol (BAL), D-PENICILLAMINE and DMSA are effective arsenic chelators.
    1) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose and frequency used depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Dose dependent side effects include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine. Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases.
    2) D-PENICILLAMINE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day, adults may require larger doses (ie, up to 2 grams/day).
    3) DMSA - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug. It has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    4) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    5) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter.
    D) A MOBILIZATION TEST - has been suggested to aid the diagnosis of mild or chronic exposure. Its usefulness has been questioned because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic. Refer to TREATMENT/INHALATION EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    E) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    F) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    G) HEMODIALYSIS - should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure.
    H) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    B) No cases of systemic arsenic poisoning following only eye exposure have been reported.
    C) If significant eye irritation is present, prolonged initial flushing and early ophthalmologic consultation are advisable.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    2) Alkalinization of the urine may prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products from hemolysis in renal tubular cells.
    a) URINE ALKALINIZATION
    1) Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg sodium bicarbonate bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. Adjust as needed to achieve a urine pH of at least 7.5 and a urine output of 1 to 3 mL/kg/hr.
    2) Assure adequate hydration and renal function. Monitor fluid balance, serum electrolytes, and blood pH. Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH.
    3) Chelation therapy may be indicated at a urine arsenic level of 200 mcg/liter or higher. Dimercaprol (BAL), D-PENICILLAMINE and DMSA are effective arsenic chelators.
    a) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose and frequency used depend on the degree of toxicity seen. Dose dependent side effects include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine. Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases.
    b) D-PENICILLAMINE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day, adults may require larger doses (i.e., up to 2 grams/day).
    c) DMSA - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug. It has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    d) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    e) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter.
    4) A MOBILIZATION TEST - has been suggested to aid the diagnosis of mild or chronic exposure. Its usefulness has been questioned because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic. Refer to TREATMENT/DERMAL EXPOSURE section in the main body of this document for more information.
    5) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    6) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
    7) HEMODIALYSIS - should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure.
    8) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids or antihistamines.
    9) Restriction from further exposure may be necessary for workers with significant arsenical dermatitis, ulcerations, or dermatoses.
    10) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child. An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal.
    B) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity. Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from 1 milligram to 10 grams.
    C) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate). However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) Paris Green is an inorganic trivalent arsenic compound which also contains copper. It is an emerald green colored, crystalline powder. Although some absorption may occur from dermal contact or inhalation, most poisonings result from ingestion. Upper respiratory tract irritation may result from inhalation exposure.
    1) Direct contact may produce conjunctival irritation or a characteristic dermatitis. Other skin findings may be melanosis, hyperkeratosis and hyperhidrosis. Hair loss and trophic nail changes may also occur with chronic exposure.
    B) Systemic Paris Green poisoning is primarily due to the arsenic content, and is not different from any other arsenic poisoning. Chronic copper poisoning from Paris Green exposure is essentially unknown in humans. It is advisable to treat all arsenic compounds as highly toxic.
    C) Multiple keratoses, chronic lymphatic leukemia and macular degeneration have been tied to occupational exposure.
    D) Acute arsenic ingestion generally produces symptoms within 30 to 60 minutes, but onset may be delayed for several hours if ingested with food. A metallic or garlic taste, vomiting, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and profuse watery (rice-water-like) and sometimes bloody diarrhea may occur. Dehydration, intense thirst, and fluid-electrolyte disturbances are common. Hypovolemia from capillary leaking ("third spacing" of fluids) is a common early sign.
    E) Systemic arsenic poisoning from occupational exposure is uncommon. Arsenic workers have developed a hoarse voice; nasal irritation and possible perforation of the nasal septum; irritation of eyes, skin, and mucous membranes; and, rarely, cirrhosis of the liver. Nausea and vomiting are infrequent. Painful ulceration of the wrist and scrotal skin, lips, and nostrils may develop with dust exposure.
    F) The primary target organs initially are the gastrointestinal tract, heart, brain, and kidneys. Seizures and pulkonary edema can result from exposure. Eventually, the skin, bone marrow, and peripheral nervous system may be significantly damaged. The peripheral neuropathy appears similar regardless of the route of exposure.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Patients may rapidly become hypotensive. Tachycardia may develop secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic or anxiety.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPOTENSION - Patients may rapidly become hypotensive after acute arsenic poisoning from "third spacing" of fluids, diarrhea, or blood loss into the GI tract (Schoolmeester & White, 1980).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) TACHYCARDIA - Patients may become tachycardic secondary to pain, hypovolemia, cardiac effects of arsenic, or anxiety (Morgan, 1989).

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) Conjunctivitis, photophobia, dimness of vision, diplopia, and lacrimation may occur. A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath.
    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) HAIR DISCOLORATION - Darkening of the hair may occur with chronic exposure (Harbison, 1998).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) CONJUNCTIVITIS - Exposure to Paris Green dust can cause eye irritation (EPA, 1985; Grant, 1993).
    1) Conjunctivitis, photophobia, dimness of vision, diplopia, and lacrimation may occur with chronic arsenic exposure (Heyman et al, 1956; Grant, 1993).
    B) MACULAR DEGENERATION - A group of pesticide sprayers who used a combination of an organophosphate and Paris Green without protective clothing or respirators for an average of seven years were found to have a high incidence of macular degeneration (14/64 workers) (Misra et al, 1982).
    1) Symptoms and signs in the affected workers included paracentral scotomas, night blindness, photophobia, and visual impairment. The contribution of the Paris Green exposure to these findings is unclear.
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) OBSTRUCTION - Nasal obstruction, followed by some inflammation of the oral and nasal cavities may occur (Harbison, 1998). Subsequent sloughing of mucous membranes and necrosis of nasal cartilage may take place, with involvement of the bony septum.
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) BREATH - A garlic-like odor may be detected on the breath (Morgan, 1993). Soreness of the tongue and excessive salivation may also be noted (Harbison, 1998).

Hepatic

    3.9.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hepatocellular damage may occur, but is not common. A common post-mortem finding is mitotic activity of hepatocytes.
    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) Hepatocellular damage may occur after acute arsenic poisoning, but is not common (Donofrio et al, 1987). Mitotic activity of hepatocytes may be a common post-mortem finding in arsenic poisoning (Mackell et al, 1985).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria, acute tubular necrosis, renal failure, and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) Anuria, hematuria, proteinuria (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980), acute tubular necrosis, renal failure (Giberson et al, 1976; Vaziri et al, 1980), and chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis have been described (Gerhardt et al, 1978).

Hematologic

    3.13.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hemolysis, pancytopenia, isolated leukopenia, or anemia may occur.
    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) Hemolysis may occur after acute arsenic poisoning (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    B) PANCYTOPENIA
    1) After either acute or chronic arsenic exposure, pancytopenia may be seen (Kyle & Pease, 1965; Kjeldsberg & Ward, 1972). However, isolated leukopenia or anemia may also be seen. The anemia is usually normochromic and normocytic, but may be hypochromic and microcytic (Kyle & Pease, 1965).
    2) Bone marrow aspirate may demonstrate pronounced erythroid hyperplasia similar to that seen with pernicious anemia (Selzer & Ancel, 1983). Basophilic stippling and rouleau formation of red cells may also be seen (Kyle & Pease, 1965).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Common skin findings may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation, and exfoliative dermatitis. Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen. Shingles (Herpes Zoster) may also be a complication.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GENERALIZED EXFOLIATIVE DERMATITIS
    1) ARSENIC SKIN LESIONS - Common skin findings after either acute or chronic arsenic poisoning may include flushing, diaphoresis, palmar hyperkeratosis, peripheral edema, hyperpigmentation, brawny desquamation (Heyman et al, 1956), and exfoliative dermatitis (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Hutton & Christians, 1983).
    B) MEE'S LINE
    1) Transverse white striae of the nails may be seen after acute exposure. Mee's lines commonly take 5 weeks to appear above the cuticle and advance 1 mm per week afterwards, allowing an approximation of the time of acute exposure (Heyman et al, 1956).
    C) HERPES ZOSTER
    1) Shingles may also be a complication of arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (with QT prolongation) have been described after acute arsenic ingestion (Peterson & Rumack, 1977; Goldsmith, 1980; St Peter et al, 1970).
    2) These dysrhythmias may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium (Sittig, 1991).
    B) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) ECG changes have included QT prolongation, left axis deviation, peaked T waves, and also deeply inverted T waves (Gousios & Adelson, 1959; Heyman et al, 1956).
    2) These ECG changes may be secondary to electrolyte imbalances rather than a direct toxic effect of arsenic on the myocardium (Sittig, 1991), although a direct, reversible effect on the myocardium has been postulated from animal experiments (Massmann & Opitz, 1954).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Upper respiratory tract irritation and hoarse voice may result. Acute respiratory failure was seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning. Pulmonary edema may occur and be life-threatening. Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Upper respiratory tract irritation may result from inhalation exposure to Paris Green (EPA, 1985; Grant, 1993; OHM/TADS , 2000).
    B) APNEA
    1) Acute respiratory failure presumably from severe weakness of respiratory muscles has been seen in a patient with severe arsenic poisoning (Greenberg et al, 1979). The condition progressed despite dimercaprol therapy and required ventilatory assistance for one month.
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Either noncardiogenic from capillary leaking, or cardiogenic from myocardial depression, may occur and be life-threatening in arsenic poisoning (Morgan, 1989).
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported in arsenic poisoning (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are possible complications. Peripheral neuropathy is common. Seizures may occur.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) Toxic delirium and encephalopathy are complications of acute arsenic poisoning (Jenkins, 1966).
    2) The encephalopathy may be permanent and result in cortical atrophy one to six months after exposure. Early institution of chelation therapy may not be successful in preventing arsenic encephalopathy (Fincher & Koerker, 1987).
    B) SECONDARY PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
    1) Peripheral neuropathy is common after acute arsenic poisoning. After acute exposure, it commonly begins one to 3 weeks later (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977; Heyman et al, 1956). It usually begins as paresthesias of the soles of the feet, then the hands, progressing proximally over the next few days (Heyman et al, 1956).
    2) Severe muscle weakness and wasting then develops, causing severe disability (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977). It may initially be confused with Guillain-Barre syndrome (Donofrio et al, 1987). The paresthesias may be painful and are frequently described as severe burning pain in a stocking-and-glove distribution (Harbison, 1998).
    3) PHYSICAL FINDINGS of arsenic neuropathy usually include prominently decreased sensation to touch, pinprick, and temperature, frequently in a stocking and glove distribution (Heyman et al, 1956). Loss of vibration sense is also common. Profound muscle weakness and wasting, distal more so than proximal, is also seen (Donofrio et al, 1987; Heyman et al, 1956). Wrist drop, foot drop, and fasciculations may be seen (Heyman et al, 1956).
    4) ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC STUDIES of arsenic neuropathy have shown a reduction of motor conduction velocity and marked abnormalities of sensory nerve action potentials (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    5) NERVE BIOPSY may demonstrate various stages of axonal degeneration without demyelination (Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977) or with demyelination (Donofrio et al, 1987).
    6) DIMERCAPROL (BAL) does not seem to be able to reverse arsenic neuropathy (Donofrio et al, 1987; Heyman et al, 1956; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977); recovery is usually very slow and incomplete. It has been claimed that if BAL is administered within hours of ingestion, however, that neuropathy may be prevented (Jenkins, 1966), although this may not always be true (Marcus, 1987).
    a) Early and prolonged chelation therapy with BAL followed by d-penicillamine did not prevent development of a mild peripheral neuropathy in a patient who injected sodium arsenite and potassium cyanide intravenously in a suicide attempt (DiNapoli et al, 1989).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures may occur (Hathaway et al, 1996; Harbison, 1998).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Trivalent arsenicals have caused teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in the offspring of pregnant mice, rats, and hamsters when administered orally or parenterally. Fetotoxicity and fetal death are possible, but arsenic is NOT likely to be a significant risk to human reproduction at permissible occupational exposure limits.
    B) Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans.
    C) Systemic toxicity was present before any effects were noted on the testes.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) HUMANS
    1) Arsenic is NOT likely to be a significant risk to human reproduction at permissible occupational exposure limits (Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985).
    2) While arsenic is likely fetotoxic in humans, data are currently inadequate to determine whether or not such effects could occur in the absence of maternal toxicity (Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Sodium arsenite has caused teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in the offspring of pregnant mice, rats, and hamsters when administered orally or parenterally (Schardein, 1993; Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985; Hood, 1972; Baxley et al, 1981). In some hamster experiments, no teratogenic effects were noted (Schardein, 1993; Hood & Harrison, 1982).
    2) Arsenic compounds have typically induced birth defects in experimental animals at high doses which may have also been maternally toxic (OTA, 1985). High doses of inorganic arsenic administered to pregnant animals results in fetal resorptions; surviving offspring have defects of the genitourinary tract (Hayes & Lawes 1991).
    3) In a cultured mouse embryo system, sodium arsenate and arsenite were both teratogenic, resulting in abnormalities of cranial closure, abnormalities of the eye and optic nerve, and pharyngeal arch defects. The ED50 for arsenate was about threefold higher than that for arsenite (Tabocova et al, 1996).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Arsenic is transferred across the placenta (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982). In studies of a population in Argentina exposed to environmental aresenic (drinking water arsenic, approximately 200 mcg/L), cord blood concentrations (median, 9 mcg/L) were almost as high as maternal blood concentrations (median, 11 mcg/L). Essentially all of the blood arsenic and about 90 percent of the urinary arsenic in both mothers and newborns was in the form of dimethylarsinic acid, compared with 70 percent in the urine of non-pregnant women, indicating that the methylation of arsenic may be upregulated during pregnancy (Concha et al, 1998).
    2) Increased rates of spontaneous abortions and decreased birth weights in the offspring were found in a study of women living near a smelter in Sweden which emitted lead, sulfur dioxide, and arsenic. There was no increased incidence of congenital malformations in this group (Schardein, 1993; Nordstrom, 1979). The significance of this study to pure chronic arsenic exposure during pregnancy is unclear. Increased numbers of miscarriages were reported in Finland with mixed exposures which included arsenic compounds (Hemminki, 1980).
    B) DEATH
    1) NEONATAL DEATH - Acute ingestion of arsenic in a female with a 30-week pregnancy has been reported to result in the death of the infant born 4 days after the poisoning (Lugo et al, 1969). The child apparently died of hyaline membrane disease, but did have elevated tissue levels of arsenic. It seems apparent that arsenic can cross the placenta.
    C) FETOTOXICITY
    1) AMA COUNCIL ON SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS - Although arsenic compounds are likely fetotoxic in humans, exposure at permissible occupational levels is not likely to present a significant risk to human reproduction (Council on Scientific Affairs, 1985).
    D) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Six women developing arsenical encephalopathy during the fourth to eighth month of pregnancy delivered normal children (Schardein, 1993).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Arsenic is excreted in the breast milk in both experimental animals and humans. There may be some risk to nursing infants of mothers exposed to arsenic, based on studies of Japanese children who drank arsenic-contaminated powdered milk and who may have suffered problems in later brain development (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS12002-03-8 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) An IARC review linked arsenic to skin cancer and a greater risk of lung cancer. OSHA has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow. Bladder, kidney, prostate, liver, breast and colon cancer have also been linked with arsenic exposure.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) The potential carcinogenicity of arsenic compounds has been reviewed (Berlin et al, 1991). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has linked arsenic to cancer of the skin, lungs, lymph glands, and bone marrow (Anon, 1979; IARC, 1973), and possibly angiosarcoma of the liver and stomach cancer (ILO, 1983).
    2) Typically, there is a 15 to 30 year latent period before developement of cancer (ILO, 1983). The evidence for human arsenical carcinogenicity is much stronger than carcinogenicity evidence in experimental animals (a somewhat unique circumstance). It has not been carcinogenic in experimental animals, except when implanted (RTECS , 1993).
    3) The US Environmental Protection Agency has classified inorganic arsenical compounds as Class A carcinogens, based on sufficient human epidemiological evidence (EPA, 1988).
    4) Exposure to as little as 1 gram of arsenic per year has been associated with CANCER (HSDB , 1993). Paris Green has been implicated as a human carcinogen. 0ne case of multiple keratoses and chronic lymphatic leukemia with a 30-year latent period has been described in a worker with a history of one-year occupational dermal exposure to Paris Green in a pesticide manufacturing facility (Leyh & Rothlaender, 1985).
    5) Arsenic is an INDIRECT CARCINOGEN. It causes cancer by a mechanism of generalized gene induction (Appel et al, 1984), rather than inducing mutations in specific genes. The question of whether or not there is a threshold dose for cancer induction by arsenic has been a matter of much debate. A literature review concluded that the threshold dose for arsenic-induced cancer is the same as that for arsenical skin disease: 400 mcg per day. Dermal hyperpigmentation may be a sensitive indicator of risk for subsequent development of cancer (Stohrer, 1991).
    6) Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin have been described after both acute (Renwick et al, 1981) and chronic (Jackson & Grainge, 1975; Wagner et al, 1979) arsenic exposure. Two patients with arsenic-induced basal cell carcinomas of the skin also developed malignancies of other organs (breast and colon) (Jackson & Grainge, 1975).
    7) Arsenic exposure has been associated with skin cancers, and possibly with bronchogenic cancer (Wagner et al, 1979) ACGIH, 1986; (IARC, 1973; HSDB , 1993). A study of a population in Taiwan drinking high-arsenic concentration artesian well water found a dose-response relationship between the amount of arsenic in the water and the incidence of mortality from bladder, kidney, skin, prostate, lung, and liver cancer (Chen et al, 1988).
    8) One worker who was exposed to arsenious oxide and sodium arsenite for 20 years developed cirrhosis of the liver and primary liver carcinoma (Harbison, 1998).
    9) One case of multiple keratoses and chronic lymphatic leukemia with a 30-year latency period has been described in a worker with a history of one-year occupational dermal exposure to Paris Green in a pesticide manufacturing facility (Leyh & Rothlaender, 1985).
    10) In additional environmental studies in various regions where arsenic exposure is endemic, recent epidemiological studies have suggested possible relationships of arsenic exposure to cancers of the lung (Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1998; Smith et al, 1998), kidney (Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1998) and bladder (Smith et al, 1998; Hopenhayn-Rich et al, 1996).

Genotoxicity

    A) Arsenic has been reported to produce chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in humans after occupational or therapeutic exposure, and in human and rodent cells in vitro.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse bloody or watery ("rice-water-like") diarrhea, pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) Early symptoms within hours following arsenic ingestion include abdominal pain, difficulty swallowing, profuse bloody or watery diarrhea (sometimes described as "rice-water-like") (Gilman et al, 1985; Sittig, 1991), pain in the extremities and muscles, weakness, and flushing of the skin.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) An arsenic blood level below 7 mcg/100 mL is considered in the normal range. Blood levels are highly variable and may be useful only after acute exposure to confirm the diagnosis; they may become undetectable following acute poisoning at times when urinary arsenic excretion remains substantial (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."
    3) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    4) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    B) HEMATOLOGIC
    1) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    C) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) SPECIFIC AGENT
    1) 24-hour urine collections for total arsenic excretion or spot specimens measured as concentration of arsenic (in micrograms or milligrams) per gram of urinary creatinine are generally the preferred samples, as they balance out the effects of varying urine volume and concentration.
    2) A method for a quick urine spot test (Reinsch test) has been described (Grande et al, 1987) but its clinical utility is uncertain. Even with chelation, an unexposed individual should not have more than 100 mcg of arsenic per 24-hour total urine output. Urinary arsenic may be elevated up to 200 to 1700 mcg/L within 4 hours after eating some seafoods (Baselt, 2000).
    a) Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure (Proctor et al, 1988).
    b) Urine levels are generally below 100 mcg/gram of creatinine, and generally below 20 mcg/gram of creatinine in unexposed individuals (Hathaway, 1996).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) HAIR
    a) Arsenic has been found in hair and nails within hours after exposure (Lander et al, 1965). Normal concentrations of arsenic range from 0 to 1.92 mg/kg in hair, and from 0 to 1.70 mg/kg in nails (Baselt, 2000).
    1) However, many commercial laboratories performing hair analyses for consumers have not been shown to yield consistent and reliable results (Barrett, 1985), and such levels cannot be interpreted in individual patients. Hair or nail analysis is only useful in epidemiologic studies to distinguish potentially exposed from unexposed groups.

Radiographic Studies

    A) ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
    1) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected (Hilfer & Mendel, 1962; Gousios & Adelson, 1959).
    2) Monitor the chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Monitoring

    A) Quantitative 24 hour urine collections are the most reliable laboratory measure of arsenic poisoning. Urinary concentrations between 700 and 1000 mcg/L (0.7 to 1.0 mg/L) may indicate potentially harmful exposure.
    B) This agent may cause nephrotoxicity. Monitor renal function tests and urinalysis in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Arsenic is radiopaque and an abdominal film should be obtained whenever arsenic ingestion is suspected.
    D) This agent may produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system. Monitor the complete blood count in patients with significant exposure.
    E) This agent may cause hepatotoxicity. Monitor liver function tests in patients with significant exposure.
    F) Monitor arterial blood gases and chest x-ray in patients who develop pulmonary edema.
    G) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension from fluid "third spacing."

Oral Exposure

    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) GASTRIC EMPTYING
    1) Aggressive decontamination with gastric lavage is recommended. If X-ray demonstrates arsenic in the lower GI tract, whole bowel irrigation should be considered. Activated charcoal may not bind significant amounts, but is recommended until definitive quantitative data are available. Fluid repletion should begin as soon as possible.
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Preliminary results suggest that activated charcoal may not be of therapeutic value in the treatment of acute arsenic poisoning (pp 5-1990).
    a) One study has reported no significant adsorption to activated charcoal, but specific quantities bound were not stated (Mitchell et al, 1989).
    b) Sodium arsenite (0.65 millimolar) and sodium arsenate (1.7 millimolar) were NOT adsorbed to activated charcoal (in a ratio of 1:10) to any measurable extent in an aqueous acidic solution (simulated gastric juice) that was incubated at 37 degrees C for 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes in an in vitro model (pp 5-1990).
    c) Solutions incubated for 120 and 240 minutes at pH 10 to 12 (simulated intestinal juices) showed adsorption of 75 to 80 percent (pp 5-1990).
    2) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    3) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION (WBI)
    1) Whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution may be a relatively safe and effective means of rapid gastrointestinal decontamination (Lee et al, 1995).
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Hypotension from acute arsenic ingestion is likely due to intravascular volume depletion from vomiting, diarrhea, or third spacing of fluids.
    2) The initial treatment should consist of adequate volume replacement with crystalloid or blood products. Placing the patient in Trendelenburg and using MAST trousers may also be useful.
    3) Aggressive monitoring of volume status should be undertaken even in the absence of hypotension initially. Bladder catheterization to monitor hourly urine output, a central venous catheter, or a Swan-Ganz catheter should be used as clinically warranted.
    4) Pressors should be used only if volume replacement does not reverse the hypotension.
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    B) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) Tachycardia may be a response to hypovolemia and should be treated initially with fluid replacement as clinically warranted.
    C) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation may occur after acute arsenic poisoning and should be treated with DC countershock and standard antiarrhythmic agents.
    2) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY
    a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    3) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    4) PROCAINAMIDE
    a) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT LOADING DOSE
    1) 20 to 50 milligrams/minute IV until dysrhythmia is suppressed or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%), or a total dose of 17 milligrams/kilogram is given (1.2 grams for a 70 kilogram person) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ALTERNATIVE DOSING: 100 mg every 5 minutes until dysrhythmia is controlled, or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%) or 17 mg/kg have been given (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) MAXIMUM DOSE: 17 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) PROCAINAMIDE/CONTROLLED INFUSION
    1) In conscious patients, procainamide should be administered as a controlled infusion (20 milligrams/minute) because of the risk of QT prolongation and its hypotensive effects (Link et al, 2015)
    c) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) 1 to 4 milligrams/minute via an intravenous infusion (Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE
    1) 15 milligrams/kilogram IV/Intraosseously over 30 to 60 minutes; discontinue if hypotension develops or the QRS widens by 50% (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    e) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Initiate at 20 mcg/kg/minute and increase in 10 mcg/kg/minute increments every 15 to 30 minutes until desired effect is achieved; up to 80 mcg/kg/minute (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    f) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAXIMUM DOSE
    1) 2 grams/day (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    g) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) ECG, blood pressure, and blood concentrations (Prod Info procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, 2011). Procainamide can produce hypotension and QT prolongation (Link et al, 2015).
    h) AVOID
    1) Avoid in patients with QT prolongation and CHF (Neumar et al, 2010).
    D) TORSADES DE POINTES
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Withdraw the causative agent. Hemodynamically unstable patients with Torsades de pointes (TdP) require electrical cardioversion. Emergent treatment with magnesium (first-line agent) or atrial overdrive pacing is indicated. Detect and correct underlying electrolyte abnormalities (ie, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia). Correct hypoxia, if present (Drew et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010; Keren et al, 1981; Smith & Gallagher, 1980).
    b) Polymorphic VT associated with acquired long QT syndrome may be treated with IV magnesium. Overdrive pacing or isoproterenol may be successful in terminating TdP, particularly when accompanied by bradycardia or if TdP appears to be precipitated by pauses in rhythm (Neumar et al, 2010). In patients with polymorphic VT with a normal QT interval, magnesium is unlikely to be effective (Link et al, 2015).
    2) MAGNESIUM SULFATE
    a) Magnesium is recommended (first-line agent) for the prevention and treatment of drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) even if the serum magnesium concentration is normal. QTc intervals greater than 500 milliseconds after a potential drug overdose may correlate with the development of TdP (Charlton et al, 2010; Drew et al, 2010). ADULT DOSE: No clearly established guidelines exist; an optimal dosing regimen has not been established. Administer 1 to 2 grams diluted in 10 milliliters D5W IV/IO over 15 minutes (Neumar et al, 2010). Followed if needed by a second 2 gram bolus and an infusion of 0.5 to 1 gram (4 to 8 mEq) per hour in patients not responding to the initial bolus or with recurrence of dysrhythmias (American Heart Association, 2005; Perticone et al, 1997). Rate of infusion may be increased if dysrhythmias recur. For persistent refractory dysrhythmias, a continuous infusion of up to 3 to 10 milligrams/minute in adults may be given (Charlton et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 25 to 50 milligrams/kilogram diluted to 10 milligrams/milliliter for intravenous infusion over 5 to 15 minutes up to 2 g (Charlton et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Use with caution in patients with renal insufficiency.
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: High doses may cause hypotension, respiratory depression, and CNS toxicity (Neumar et al, 2010). Toxicity may be observed at magnesium levels of 3.5 to 4.0 mEq/L or greater (Charlton et al, 2010).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respiratory rate, motor strength, deep tendon reflexes, serum magnesium, phosphorus, and calcium concentrations (Prod Info magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, 2009).
    3) OVERDRIVE PACING
    a) Institute electrical overdrive pacing at a rate of 130 to 150 beats per minute, and decrease as tolerated. Rates of 100 to 120 beats per minute may terminate torsades (American Heart Association, 2005). Pacing can be used to suppress self-limited runs of TdP that may progress to unstable or refractory TdP, or for override refractory, persistent TdP before the potential development of ventricular fibrillation (Charlton et al, 2010). In a case series overdrive pacing was successful in terminating TdP associated with bradycardia and drug-induced QT prolongation (Neumar et al, 2010).
    4) POTASSIUM REPLETION
    a) Potassium supplementation, even if serum potassium is normal, has been recommended by many experts (Charlton et al, 2010; American Heart Association, 2005). Supplementation to supratherapeutic potassium concentrations of 4.5 to 5 mmol/L has been suggested, although there is little evidence to determine the optimal range in dysrhythmia (Drew et al, 2010; Charlton et al, 2010).
    5) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) Isoproterenol has been successful in aborting torsades de pointes that was resistant to magnesium therapy in a patient in whom transvenous overdrive pacing was not an option (Charlton et al, 2010) and has been successfully used to treat torsades de pointes associated with bradycardia and drug induced QT prolongation (Keren et al, 1981; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol may have a limited role in pharmacologic overdrive pacing in select patients with drug-induced torsades de pointes and acquired long QT syndrome (Charlton et al, 2010; Neumar et al, 2010). Isoproterenol should be avoided in patients with polymorphic VT associated with familial long QT syndrome (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) DOSE: ADULT: 2 to 10 micrograms/minute via a continuous monitored intravenous infusion; titrate to heart rate and rhythm response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Correct hypovolemia before using; contraindicated in patients with acute cardiac ischemia (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    1) Contraindicated in patients with preexisting dysrhythmias; tachycardia or heart block due to digitalis toxicity; ventricular dysrhythmias that require inotropic therapy; and angina. Use with caution in patients with coronary insufficiency (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    d) MAJOR ADVERSE EFFECTS: Tachycardia, cardiac dysrhythmias, palpitations, hypotension or hypertension, nervousness, headache, dizziness, and dyspnea (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    e) MONITORING PARAMETERS: Monitor heart rate and rhythm, blood pressure, respirations and central venous pressure to guide volume replacement (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    6) OTHER DRUGS
    a) Mexiletine, verapamil, propranolol, and labetalol have also been used to treat TdP, but results have been inconsistent (Khan & Gowda, 2004).
    7) AVOID
    a) Avoid class Ia antidysrhythmics (eg, quinidine, disopyramide, procainamide, aprindine), class Ic (eg, flecainide, encainide, propafenone) and most class III antidysrhythmics (eg, N-acetylprocainamide, sotalol) since they may further prolong the QT interval and have been associated with TdP.
    E) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    F) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) Begin chelation therapy in symptomatic patients. The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been recommended as 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT
    a) Repeat courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter (Goldfrank et al, 1986; AMA, 1986). Observation for return of symptoms is strongly recommended.
    3) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure:
    1) BASELINE COLLECTION - A 24-hour urine collection for baseline arsenic excretion (Normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) CHELATED COLLECTION - Following the baseline 24-hour collection, a second 24-hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Other chelators have been used in similar tests.
    3) INTERPRETATION - Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5-day course of D-penicillamine or another chelator. 24-hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended.
    b) SEAFOOD - During the mobilization test the patient should avoid seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989).
    c) SPOT SAMPLES - For diagnostic purposes, a spot urine arsenic, blood arsenic (normal less than 7 micrograms/deciliter), pubic hair arsenic (normal less than 1 microgram/gram), and nail arsenic (normal less than 1.7 micrograms/gram) may be helpful, but results must be carefully interpreted.
    G) DIMERCAPROL
    1) DOSE: Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose used is dependent on the severity of the patient's symptoms and the urinary arsenic levels.
    a) Limited supplies of dimercaprol following an acute massive epidemic (N=718) of sodium arsenite poisoning prompted health care providers to modify the dosing regimen of dimercaprol (Roses et al, 1991). The study population (N=307) was divided into 3 treatment groups based on urinary arsenic concentrations. All subjects in all treatment groups were free of arsenic related symptomatology at 1 or 2 year follow-up.
    1) Two hundred forty-six subjects with urinary arsenic concentrations up to 75 micrograms/deciliter were given no dimercaprol.
    2) Forty-nine subjects with urinary arsenic concentrations from 76 to 500 micrograms/deciliter received dimercaprol 2 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly once daily for 10 days.
    3) Twelve subjects with urinary arsenic concentrations greater than 500 micrograms/deciliter were administered dimercaprol 2 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 8 hours on days 1 and 2, every 12 hours on days 3 and 4, and every 24 hours from day 5 to 10. Three subjects in this group also received supportive treatment.
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Typical side effects which are dose related include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, seizures, "leukotoxic effect", and reducing substances in the urine (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    3) EFFICACY
    a) Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects.
    b) CHILDREN:
    1) BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948). It has also been reported to produce complete recovery in a woman and her 20-week fetus after an acute ingestion of inorganic arsenic by the mother (Daya et al, 1989).
    c) ANIMALS: BAL has been shown to reduce the organ deposition of arsenic in a rabbit model using subcutaneous injections of Lewisite at the LD10 and LD40 and 4 doses of BAL of 35 mg/kg each (Snider et al, 1990).
    H) PENICILLAMINE
    1) DOSE: The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses may be required in adults.
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity, but this has not been reported when the drug is used short term for heavy metal chelation.
    3) EFFICACY
    a) CHILDREN:
    1) D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977; Kuruvilla et al, 1975; Watson et al, 1981).
    b) ANIMALS:
    1) In an experimental animal model, mice and guinea pigs were injected subcutaneously with 8.4 milligrams/kilogram arsenic trioxide and 30 minutes later 0.7 millimole/kilogram (104.5 milligrams/kilogram) of d-penicillamine was administered. D-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in this model (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    c) DISADVANTAGES - It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex.
    d) It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    I) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY
    a) SUMMARY: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA, Succimer), is currently approved for the treatment of childhood lead poisoning. It appears to be an effective chelator of arsenic in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978; Hannemann et al, 1995) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988).
    1) DMSA has been shown to have a safety ratio of 20 times greater than BAL. The total dosage of BAL is limited by its intrinsic toxicity, and the greater safety ratio of DMSA allows for longer and more prolonged dosing of DMSA (Inns & Rice, 1993).
    2) In a double-blind, randomized crossover, placebo-controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenic disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1,400 mg/day for one week, followed by 1,050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three-week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    b) DOSE: The recommended initial dose is 10 milligrams/kilogram or 350 milligrams/square meter every 8 hours for 5 days, followed by 10 milligrams/kilogram every 12 hours for 14 days (Prod Info, 1991).
    c) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) During clinical trials in children the following adverse reactions were reported (Prod Info, 1991):
    Transient LFT increase:6 to 10%
    Mucosal vesicular eruptions:1 case
    Rash, pruritus:2.6%
    Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea:12%
    Drowsiness, paresthesia:1%
    Sore throat, rhinorrhea:3.7%
    Thrombocytosis, eosinophilia:0.5%

    2) Succimer has a sulfurous odor that may be evident in the patients' breath and urine (Prod Info, 1991a).
    d) CASE REPORT - In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal excretion of arsenic increased 1.5 fold (Fournier et al, 1988).
    e) DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    f) An intravenous preparation of DMSA was used to treat a 26-year-old man with multi organsystem failure after acute trivalent arsenic overdose (Hantson et al, 1995).
    1) A solution was prepared with 1.6 grams of DMSA diluted in 50 milliliters of sterile water and titrated with 10N NaOH to pH 7.2 to 7.4 and filtered through a 0.22 micron filter. The solution was administered in 500 milliliters of 0.9% saline solution as an infusion over 1 hour at a dose of 20 milligram/kilogram/day for 5 days followed by 10 milligram/kilogram/day. The DMSA solution was also given via peritoneal dialysis, 20 milligrams/liter of dialysate with 12 liters exchanged daily for 5 days.
    J) UNITHIOL
    1) EFFICACY
    a) SUMMARY: 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulphonic acid (DMPS) is used in Europe as a chelating agent for heavy metal poisonings. It appears to be an effective chelator of arsenic in experimental animals (Inns et al, 1990; Kreppel et al, 1990; (Aposhian et al, 1984; Hsu et al, 1983) Aposhian et al, 1981) and man (Goebel et al, 1990; Kew et al, 1993).
    b) DOSE: DMPS has been given to adults in a dosage of 100 mg orally three times daily for 3 weeks (Kew et al, 1993) and up to 9 months (Goebel et al, 1990).
    K) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of mice poisoned with sodium arsenite (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, and so may become the only chelator which can be given intravenously for acute arsenic poisoning.
    2) METHYL GROUP DONORS - Sulfo-adenosyl-L-methionine (Samyr(R), Bio-research, Milan) has been proposed as an agent which may promote methylation and subsequent urinary elimination of arsenic (Mahieu et al, 1987).
    L) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    M) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) IMMUNOTHERAPY - Use of immunotherapy for the treatment of sodium arsenite toxicity is being investigated in animal models. Leikin et al (1991) demonstrated a protective effect of anti-arsenic reactive serum female balb/c mice. Applicability of immunotherapy to treatment of human poisonings has not been determined.
    2) 2,3-DITHIOERYTHRITOL - Is a synthesized derivative of BAL. Preliminary laboratory evidence indicates that it is less toxic than BAL or DMSA (Boyd et al, 1989).
    N) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) MELARSOPROL ENCEPHALOPATHY - Only 4 percent of those patients given corticosteroids (prednisolone, not more than 40 milligrams daily) developed melarsoprol encephalopathy compared to approximately 33 percent in those patients receiving no steroids in a prospective randomized trial involving 600 patients with parasitology-confirmed Trypanosoma brucei gambiense infections (Pepin et al, 1989).
    O) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    B) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been said to be 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure, although some authorities doubt its usefulness because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic -
    1) Collect a 24-hour urine for baseline arsenic excretion (normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) Following the baseline 24-hour collection, a second 24-hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours, of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Cannot be given to patients allergic to penicillin.
    3) Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5-day course of D-penicillamine. 24-hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended. When urine arsenic falls below 50 micrograms/24 hours, chelation may be terminated. Observation for return of symptoms and a repeat of the mobilization test 1 to 2 weeks following initial therapy are strongly recommended.
    b) During the mobilization test, the patient should avoid eating seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    c) In epidemiologic studies, blood arsenic, pubic hair arsenic, and nail arsenic may be helpful to define potentially exposed versus unexposed populations, but such results cannot be interpreted in individual patients.
    C) DIMERCAPROL
    1) EFFICACY - Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator, but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects. BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Typical side effects which are dose related include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    3) DOSE - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose used is dependent on the severity of symptoms and urinary arsenic levels.
    D) PENICILLAMINE
    1) EFFICACY - D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977) Kuravilla et al, 1975; (Watson et al, 1981). It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex. It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity; these effects have not been reported when the drug is used for short-term heavy metal chelation (Gilman et al, 1985).
    3) DOSE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses (i.e., up to 2 grams/day) may be required in adults.
    4) In an experimental animal model, d-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in trivalent arsenic-poisoned mice and guinea pigs (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    E) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug which appears to be a very effective arsenic chelator in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988). In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long-term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal arsenic excretion increased 1.5 fold (Fournier et al, 1988). DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    2) In a double-blind, randomized crossover, placebo-controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenic disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1,400 mg/day for one week, followed by 1,050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three-week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    F) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) EFFICACY - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of sodium arsenite in mice (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, but has not been studied for this indication in humans and cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    G) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter (Goldfrank et al, 1986; AMA, 1986).
    H) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    2) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    I) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    J) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976). Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980). This may be greater than renal clearance in the presence of oliguria or renal failure.
    2) Hemodialysis was instituted 4-hours postadmission in a 30-year-old male who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing 1.5 percent arsenous oxide (equivalent to 2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic), although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988). Additional studies are needed to evaluate this regimen for safety and efficacy before it can be routinely recommended (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    K) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    L) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION AND EVALUATION
    1) CONSULTATION - If significant eye irritation is present, prolonged initial flushing and early ophthalmologic consultation are advisable. Of note, no cases of systemic arsenic poisoning have been reported following only eye exposure.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) ALKALINE DIURESIS
    1) Alkalinization of the urine may help prevent deposition of red cell breakdown products in renal tubular cells if hemolysis is occurring.
    2) SODIUM BICARBONATE/INITIAL DOSE
    a) Administer 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram of sodium bicarbonate as an intravenous bolus. Add 132 milliequivalents (3 ampules) sodium bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents potassium chloride (as needed) to one liter of dextrose 5 percent in water and infuse at approximately 1.5 times the maintenance fluid rate. In patients with underlying dehydration additional administration of 0.9% saline may be needed to maintain adequate urine output (1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Manipulate bicarbonate infusion to maintain a urine pH of at least 7.5.
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE/REPEAT DOSES
    a) Additional sodium bicarbonate (1 to 2 milliequivalents per kilogram) and potassium chloride (20 to 40 milliequivalents per liter) may be needed to achieve an alkaline urine.
    4) CAUTION
    a) Obtain hourly intake/output and urine pH. Assure adequate hydration and renal function prior to alkalinization. Do not administer potassium to an oliguric or anuric patient. Monitor fluid and electrolyte balance carefully. Monitor blood pH, especially in intubated patients, to avoid severe alkalemia.
    B) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) The urine arsenic level which should prompt chelation in an asymptomatic patient has been said to be 200 micrograms/liter (Kersjes et al, 1987).
    2) MOBILIZATION TEST
    a) Diagnosis for mild or chronic exposure can be aided by the following procedure, although some authorities doubt its usefulness because of the relatively rapid excretion of absorbed arsenic:
    1) Collect a 24 hour urine for baseline arsenic excretion (normal less than 100 micrograms/24 hours).
    2) Following the baseline 24-hour collection, a second 24-hour urine collection should be performed while the patient receives 4 doses, every 6 hours, of D-penicillamine (25 milligrams/kilogram/dose up to 250 milligrams/dose). Cannot be given to patients allergic to penicillin.
    3) Either urine collection showing arsenic excretion greater than 100 micrograms/24 hours is diagnostic and should be followed by a 5-day course of D-penicillamine. 24-hour urine collections to measure arsenic excretion during chelation are recommended. When urine arsenic falls below 50 micrograms/24 hours, chelation may be terminated. Observation for return of symptoms and a repeat of the mobilization test 1 to 2 weeks following initial therapy are strongly recommended.
    b) During the mobilization test, the patient should avoid eating seafood. Ingestion of seafood, particularly shellfish, may transiently increase urinary arsenic levels to 200 to 1700 micrograms/liter (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    c) In epidemiologic studies, blood arsenic, pubic hair arsenic, and nail arsenic may be helpful to define potentially exposed versus unexposed populations, but such results cannot be interpreted in individual patients.
    C) DIMERCAPROL
    1) EFFICACY - Dimercaprol (BAL) is an effective arsenic chelator, but has the disadvantages of requiring painful intramuscular injections and having numerous side effects. BAL has been reported to result in clinical improvement and decrease in hospital days in children poisoned with arsenic (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Typical side effects which are dose related include hypertension, tachycardia, anorexia, restlessness, vomiting, pain, salivation, fever, convulsions, "leukotoxic effect," and reducing substances in the urine (Woody & Kometani, 1948).
    3) DOSE - Usual dosage range is 3 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intramuscularly every 4 to 12 hours until symptoms resolve or another chelator is substituted. The dose used is dependent on the severity of symptoms and urinary arsenic levels.
    D) PENICILLAMINE
    1) EFFICACY - D-penicillamine has been successfully used in acute arsenic poisoning in children (Peterson & Rumack, 1977) Kuravilla et al, 1975; (Watson et al, 1981). It has the advantage of being an oral agent, but the disadvantages of not being able to be given to patients allergic to penicillin, not being retained well if patients are vomiting, and the theoretical problem of enhancing absorption of the arsenic-chelator complex. It does not appear to result in depletion of zinc and copper when given for several weeks (Peterson & Rumack, 1977).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS - Long term therapy for the treatment of arthritis or Wilson's disease has resulted in fever, pruritus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and renal toxicity; these effects have not been reported when the drug is used for short-term heavy metal chelation (Gilman et al, 1985).
    3) DOSE - The usual dose is 25 milligrams/kilogram/dose given four times daily up to one gram per day (Peterson & Rumack, 1977), but larger doses (i.e., up to 2 grams/day) may be required in adults.
    4) In an experimental animal model, d-penicillamine was found to lack effectiveness in trivalent arsenic-poisoned mice and guinea pigs (Kreppel et al, 1989).
    E) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY - 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is an investigational drug which appears to be a very effective arsenic chelator in experimental animals (Graziano et al, 1978) and man (Lenz et al, 1981; Kosnett & Becker, 1987; Fournier et al, 1988). In a patient treated with DMSA (30 milligrams/kilogram/day for 5 days) for long-term ingestion of arsenic, plasma concentrations were unchanged after treatment and renal arsenic excretion increased 1.5-fold (Fournier et al, 1988). DMSA has the advantage of being an oral agent as well as being relatively non-toxic.
    2) In a double-blind, randomized crossover, placebo-controlled study of patients with chronic environmental arsenic disease in West Bengal, patients were given placebo or DMSA 1,400 mg/day for one week, followed by 1,050 mg/day for two additional weeks. The alternative treatment was then administered following a three-week delay. Although both groups reported clinical improvement, treatment was no better than control (Guha Mazumder et al, 1998).
    F) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) EFFICACY - N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to increase the LD50 of sodium arsenite in mice (Shum et al, 1981). NAC has the advantage of being both an oral and an intravenous agent, but has not been studied for this indication in humans and cannot presently be recommended for the treatment of arsenic poisoning.
    G) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) THERAPEUTIC END-POINT - Repeat five-day courses of chelation therapy should be prescribed in severe poisonings until the 24-hour urine arsenic level falls below 50 micrograms/liter (Goldfrank et al, 1986; AMA, 1986).
    H) NEUROPATHY
    1) Early administration (within 18 hours of acute exposure) of BAL may be effective in preventing arsenical neuropathy in some cases (Jenkins, 1966). However, once neuropathy has developed (usually 1 to 3 weeks after acute exposure), chelation with BAL may not be effective in reversing it (Heyman et al, 1956; Donofrio et al, 1987; Le Quesne & McLeod, 1977).
    2) Physical therapy may be helpful for patients with established arsenical neuropathies.
    I) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    J) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976). Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980). This may be greater than renal clearance in the presence of oliguria or renal failure.
    2) Hemodialysis was instituted 4-hours postadmission in a 30-year-old man who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing 1.5 percent arsenous oxide (equivalent to 2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic), although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988). Additional studies are needed to evaluate this regimen for safety and efficacy before it can be routinely recommended (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    K) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids or antihistamines.
    2) Workers with significant arsenical dermatitis, ulcerations, or dermatoses may need to be precluded from further exposure.
    L) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    M) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis should be performed in the presence of any degree of renal failure, as the main route of excretion will be inhibited if this occurs. As the serum creatinine falls, urinary arsenic may increase (Giberson et al, 1976).
    2) Mathieu et al (1992) report the effect of hemodialysis and dimercaprol on arsenic kinetics following an ingestion of 10 grams of sodium arsenate (40 to 50 percent arsenic). During the 15 days of hospitalization, 235 milligrams of arsenic was eliminated in the urine.
    a) Instantaneous hemodialysis clearance was 85 +/- 75 milliliters/minute without previous BAL and 87.5 +/- 75 milliliters/minute with a previous 250 milligram BAL injection.
    b) BAL 250 milligrams was given one time only at approximately 20 hours postingestion.
    c) One month after discharge the patient was admitted to another hospital for a sensory and motor polyneuritis involving both upper and lower limbs. Arsenic concentrations in blood and urine were not detectable, however, BAL was administered for 8 days at this institution. All neurologic signs resolved over 3 months.
    3) Dialysanse of arsenic in two patients was 76 and 87 milliliters/minute (Vaziri et al, 1980).
    4) Additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hemodialysis in the treatment of arsenic poisoning in the absence of renal insufficiency before it can be routinely recommended.
    a) Hemodialysis was instituted 4 hours postadmission in a 30-year-old male who ingested 6 ounces of a rodenticide containing arsenous oxide 1.5 percent (approximately 2,150 milligrams of metallic arsenic) although the patient exhibited no evidence of renal impairment (Fesmire et al, 1988).

Summary

    A) One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child. An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal.
    B) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity. Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from 1 milligram to 10 grams.
    C) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate). However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) One milligram/kilogram of ingested arsenic may be lethal in a child (Woody & Kometani, 1948; HSDB , 2000).
    2) As little as 20 milligrams of arsenic may produce life-threatening toxicity (Zaloga et al, 1970; Schoolmeester & White, 1980; Hutton & Christians, 1983).
    3) An oral dose of 120 mg of arsenic trioxide may be fatal (Finkel, 1983).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) Between 1966 and 1979, 61 cases of accidental sodium arsenite poisoning, including 11 patients who were hospitalized and 24 fatal cases in adults and children, were reported to the EPA's Pesticide Incident Monitoring System (PIMS) (EPA, 1988).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) AVERAGE HUMAN ARSENIC INTAKE - 250 to 330 micrograms/day (in food and water) (Gilman et al, 1985; Baselt & Cravey, 1989)
    B) ACUTE
    1) Estimates of acute oral toxic doses of various arsenic compounds range from 1 milligram to 10 grams.
    2) Arsenic trioxide in a solubilized form becomes sodium arsenite, which is more toxic than in an unsolubilized form. 200 milligrams of arsenic trioxide ingested acutely by an adult may be lethal (Baselt & Cravey, 1989; Baselt, 1988).
    3) Trivalent arsenic (arsenite) is more toxic in animals than the pentavalent form (arsenate) (Morgan, 1989). However, significant toxicity may occur with large amounts of pentavalent salts in humans. Pentavalent arsenic may be converted in vivo to trivalent arsenic.
    C) CASE REPORTS
    1) INFANT
    a) Acute ingestion of 9 to 14 milligrams of arsenic trioxide by a 16-month-old child produced classic GI signs and symptoms of arsenic poisoning (Watson et al, 1981).
    2) ADULT
    a) A 30-year-old man survived an ingestion of 6 ounces of "Blue Ball Rat Killer" containing 1.5% arsenous oxide (2,150 milligrams metallic arsenic per 6 ounces) with aggressive therapy (fluid resuscitation, chelation, and hemodialysis) (Fesmire et al, 1988).
    3) OCCUPATIONAL
    a) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES (ACGIH, 1986) -
    1) No definite evidence of intoxication was noted in a pharmaceutical plant with an average arsenic air concentration of 0.2 mg/m(3) (ACGIH, 1986).
    2) An increased incidence of cancer was reported in factories with airborne arsenic concentrations of 0.002 to 0.65 mg/m(3) in "light exposure areas" and 1.47 to 1.56 mg/m(3) in "medium and high exposure areas" (ACGIH, 1986).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS12002-03-8 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS12002-03-8 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS12002-03-8 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS12002-03-8 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: RTECS, 2000 Lewis, 1996; Budavari, 1996 OHM/TADS, 2000
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 22 mg/kg
    b) Female, 100 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (SKIN)RAT:
    a) 2400 mg/kg

Physical Characteristics

    A) Paris Green is an emerald green, crystalline, ordorless powder (Budavari, 1996) HSBD, 2000).

Molecular Weight

    A) 1013.80 (Budavari, 1996)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    15) AMA: Drugs used in the treatment of poisoning - AMA Drug Evaluations, 6th ed, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1986, pp 1641-1643.
    16) Al-Mahasneh QM & Rodgers GC: An in vitro study of efficacy of activated charcoal as an adsorbent for arsenical salts (abstract PO 3.35). International Congress on Clinical Toxicology, Poison Control and Analytical Toxicology, LUXTOX 90, Programme and Abstracts (May 2-5). Luxembourg, 1990.
    17) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    18) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    19) Anon: Health hazards of inorganic arsenic, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, 1979.
    20) Aposhian HV, Carter DE, & Hoover TD: DMSA, DMPS, and DMPA - as arsenic antidotes. Fund Appl Toxicol 1984; 4:S58-S70.
    21) Appel KE, Hildebrandt AG, & Bannasch P: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1984; 116:232-236.
    22) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    23) Barlow SM & Sullivan FM: Arsenic and its compounds, in: Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals, Academic Press, London, England, 1982, pp 62-82.
    24) Barrett S: Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?. JAMA 1985; 254:1041-1045.
    25) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 3rd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, IL, 1989, pp 65-69.
    26) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, PSG Publishing Company, Littleton, MA, 1988, pp 28-34.
    27) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    28) Baxley MN, Hood RD, & Vedel GC: Prenatal toxicity of orally administered sodium arsenite in mice. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1981; 26:749-756.
    29) Berlin A, Draper MH, & Duffus JH: The toxicology of chemicals - 1. Carcinogenicity, Volume III - Summary reviews of the scientific evidence, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1991.
    30) Bouhouch R, El Houari T, Fellat I, et al: Pharmacological therapy in children with nodal reentry tachycardia: when, how and how long to treat the affected patients. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):766-769.
    31) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    32) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    33) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 11th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1989, pp 411.
    34) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1996.
    35) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    36) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    37) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    38) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    39) Charlton NP , Lawrence DT , Brady WJ , et al: Termination of drug-induced torsades de pointes with overdrive pacing. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28(1):95-102.
    40) Chen CJ, Chiou HY, & Chiang MH: Dose-response relationship between ischemic heart disease mortality and long-term arsenic exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996; 16:504-510.
    41) Chen CJ, Kuo TL, & Wu MM: Arsenic and cancers (Letter). Lancet 1988; 1:414-415.
    42) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    43) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    44) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    45) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2A, Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981, pp 1517-1528.
    46) Concha G, Vogler G, & Lezcano D: Exposure to inorganic arsenic metabolites during early human development. Toxicol Sci 1998; 44:185-190.
    47) Council on Scientific Affairs: Effects of Toxic Chemicals on the Reproductive System, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1985.
    48) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    49) Daya MR, Irwin R, & Parshley MC: Arsenic ingestion in pregnancy (abstract 72). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:347.
    50) DiNapoli J, Hall AH, & Drake R: Cyanide and arsenic poisoning by intravenous injection. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:308-311.
    51) Donofrio PD, Wilbourn AJ, & Albers JW: Acute arsenic intoxication presenting as Guillain-Barre-like syndrome. Muscle & Nerve 1987; 10:114-120.
    52) Drew BJ, Ackerman MJ, Funk M, et al: Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(9):934-947.
    53) EPA: EPA chemical profile on paris green, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1985.
    54) EPA: Pesticide Fact Handbook, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1988.
    55) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    56) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    57) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    58) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    59) Fesmire FM, Schauben JL, & Roberge RJ: Survival following massive arsenic ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:602-606.
    60) Fincher RME & Koerker RM: Long-term survival in acute arsenic encephalopathy. Follow-up using newer measures of electrophysiologic parameters. Am J Med 1987; 82:549-552.
    61) Finkel AJ: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wright, PSG Inc, Boston, MA, 1983, pp 17-24.
    62) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.
    63) Freeman JW & Couch JR: Prolonged encephalopathy with arsenic poisoning. Neurology 1978; 28:853-855.
    64) Gerhardsson L, Dahlgren E, & Eriksson A: Fatal arsenic poisoning -- a case report. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14:130-133.
    65) Gerhardt RE, Hudson JB, & Rao RN: Chronic renal insufficiency from cortical necrosis induced by arsenic poisoning. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:1267-1269.
    66) Giberson A, Vaziri ND, & Mirahamadi K: Hemodialysis of acute arsenic intoxication with transient renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136:1303-1304.
    67) Gilman AG, Goodman LS, & Rall TW: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th ed, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1985, pp 1614-1617.
    68) Goebel HH, Schmidt PF, & Bohl J: Polyneuropathy due to acute arsenic intoxication: biopsy studies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1990; 49:137-149.
    69) Goldfrank LR, Howland MA, & Kirstein RH: Heavy Metals, in Golfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 3rd ed, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT, 1986, pp 609-618.
    70) Goldsmith S: Arsenic-induced atypical ventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:1096-1098.
    71) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    72) Gousios AG & Adelson L: Electrocardiographic and radiographic findings in acute arsenic poisoning. Am J Med 1959; 659-663.
    73) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    74) Grande GA, Rogers AA, & Ling LJ: Urine spot test as guide to treatment in acute pentavalent arsenic ingestion. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:73-74.
    75) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 260.
    76) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    77) Graziano JH, Cuccia D, & Friedheim E: The pharmacology of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid and its potential use in arsenic poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 207:1051-1055.
    78) Greenberg C, Davies S, & McGowan T: Acute respiratory failure following severe arsenic poisoning. Chest 1979; 76:596-598.
    79) Guha Mazumder DN, Ghoshal UC, & Saha J: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic-contaminated subsoil water. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:683-690.
    80) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    81) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1993; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    82) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    83) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    84) Hannemann M, Kreppel H, & Kraus M: Toxicology of metals: BAL, DMPS, DMSA and new DMSA analogues as arsenic antidotes (abstract). Przegl Lek 1995; 52:175.
    85) Hantson P, Mahieu P, & Lauwerys R: Tolerance of intravenous dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) therapy for acute arsenic poisoning (abstract). Przegl Lek 1995; 52:175-176.
    86) Harbison RM: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    87) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    88) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    89) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    90) Hemminki K: Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1980; 45:123-126.
    91) Hernandez-Zavala A, Del Razo LM, & Aguilar C: Alteration in bilirubin excretion in individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Toxicol Lett 1998; 99:79-84.
    92) Heyman A, Pfeiffer JB Jr, & Willett RW: Peripheral neuropathy caused by arsenical intoxication. A study of 41 cases with observations on the effects of BAL (2,3-dimercapto-propanol). N Engl J Med 1956; 254:401-409.
    93) Hilfer RJ & Mendel A: Acute arsenic intoxication diagnosed by roentgenograms. Report of a case with survival. N Engl J Med 1962; 266:663-664.
    94) Hood RD & Harrison WP: Effects of prenatal arsenite exposure in the hamster. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1982; 29:671-678.
    95) Hood RD: Effects of sodium arsenite on fetal development. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1972; 7:216-222.
    96) Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, & Fuchs A: Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiology 1996; 7:117-124.
    97) Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, & Smith AH: Lung and kidney cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Cordoba, Argentina. Int J Epidmiol 1998; 27:561-569.
    98) Hsu CA, Aposhian V, & Heydolph S: Optical isomers of 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonate: antidotal activity, in vitro and in vivo, against sodium arsenite. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 224:314-318.
    99) Hutton JT & Christians BL: Sources, symptoms, and signs of arsenic poisoning. J Fam Pract 1983; 17:423-426.
    100) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    101) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    102) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    103) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    104) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    105) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    106) IARC: Arsenic and Inorganic Arsenic Compounds, in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1987.
    107) IARC: Arsenic and Inorganic Arsenic Compounds, in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, Vol 2, Some inorganic and organometallic compounds, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1973, pp 48-73.
    108) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    109) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    110) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed, Vols 1 & 2, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
    111) Inns RH & Rice P: Efficacy of dimercapto chelating agents for the treatment of poisoning by percutaneously applied dichloro(2-chlorovinyl)arsine in rabbits. Hum Exp Toxicol 1993; 12:241-246.
    112) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    113) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    114) Jackson R & Grainge JW: Arsenic and cancer. Canad Med Assoc J 1975; 113:396-401.
    115) Jenkins RB: Inorganic arsenic and the nervous system. Brain 1966; 89:479-498.
    116) Keren A, Tzivoni D, & Gavish D: Etiology, warning signs and therapy of torsade de pointes: a study of 10 patients. Circulation 1981; 64:1167-1174.
    117) Kersjes MP, Maurer JR, & Trestrail JH: An analysis of arsenic exposures referred to the Blodgett Regional Poison Center. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:75-78.
    118) Kew J, Morris C, & Aihie A: Arsenic and mercury intoxication due to Indian ethnic remedies. Br Med J 1993; 306:506-507.
    119) Khan IA & Gowda RM: Novel therapeutics for treatment of long-QT syndrome and torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol 2004; 95(1):1-6.
    120) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    121) Kjeldsberg & Ward: Leukemia in arsenic poisoning. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77:935.
    122) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    123) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    124) Kosnett MJ & Becker CE: Dimercaptosuccinic acid as a treatment for arsenic poisoning (Abstract), AACT/AAPCC/ABMT/CAPCC Annual Scientific Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 1987.
    125) Kreppel H, Reichl FX, & Forth W: Lack of effectiveness of D-penicillamine in experimental arsenic poisoning. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:1-5.
    126) Kuruvilla A, Bergeson PS, & Done AK: Arsenic poisoning in childhood. An unusual case report with special notes on therapy with penicillamine. Clin Toxicol 1975; 8:535-540.
    127) Kyle RA & Pease GL: Hematologic aspects of arsenic intoxication. N Engl J Med 1965; 273:18-23.
    128) Lander H, Hodge PR, & Crisp CS: Arsenic in the hair and nails. Its significance in acute arsenical poisoning. J Forens Med 1965; 12:52-67.
    129) Le Quesne PM & McLeod JG: Peripheral neuropathy following a single exposure to arsenic. Clinical course in four patients with electrophysiological and histological studies. J Neurol Sci 1977; 32:437-451.
    130) Lee DC, Roberts JR, & Kelly JJ: Whole-bowel irrigation as an adjunct in the treatment of radiopaque arsenic (letter). Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13:244-245.
    131) Lenz K, Hruby K, & Druml W: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in human arsenic poisoning. Arch Toxicol 1981; 47:241-243.
    132) Lewis DR, Southwick JW, & Ouellet-Hellstrom R: Drinking water arsenic in Utah: A cohort mortality study. Environ Health Prospect 1999; 107:359-365.
    133) Leyh F & Rothlaender JP: Multiple bowenoide arsen-keratosen (German). Derm Beruf Unwelt 1985; 33:99-101.
    134) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    135) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    136) Luedtke SA, Kuhn RJ, & McCaffrey FM: Pharmacologic management of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part 2: Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and junctional and atrial ectopic tachycardia. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31(11):1347-1359.
    137) Lugo, Cassaty, & Palmisano: Acute maternal arsenic intoxication. Am J Dis Child 1969; 117:328.
    138) MMWR: Reduction of children's arsenic exposure following relocation - Mill Creek, Montana. MMWR: MMWR 1987; 36:505-507.
    139) Mackell MA, Poklis A, & Gantner GE: An unsuspected arsenic poisoning murder disclosed by forensic autopsy. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1985; 6:358-361.
    140) Mahieu P, Buchet JP, & Lauwerys R: Evolution clinique et biologique d'une intoxication orale aigue par l'anhydride arsenieux et considerations sur l'attitude therapeutique. J Toxicol Clin Exp 1987; 4:273-278.
    141) Mandapati R , Byrum CJ , Kavey RE , et al: Procainamide for rate control of postsurgical junctional tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21(2):123-128.
    142) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    143) Marcus SM: Survival after massive arsenic trioxide ingestion (Abstract), AACT/AAPCC/ABMT/CAPCC Annual Scientific Meeting, Vancouver, BC, 1987.
    144) Massmann VW & Opitz H: Experimental investigations of EKG changes with chronic arsenic poisoning. Zeitschrift fur Kreislaufforschung 1954; 48:704-713.
    145) Misra UK, Nag D, & Misra NK: Macular degeneration associated with chronic pesticide exposure. Lancet 1982; 1:288.
    146) Mitchell RD, Walberg CB, & Gupta RC: In vitro adsorption properties of activated charcoal with selected inorganic compounds (Abstract). Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:444-445.
    147) Morgan DP: Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 4th ed, Global Professional Publications, Englewood, CO, 1993.
    148) Morgan DP: Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 4th ed. EPA-540/9-88-0015, US Environmental Protection Agency, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1989, pp 54-62.
    149) Murer AJL, Abildtrup A, & Poulsen OM: Estimation of the method evaluation function for the determination of hydride-generating arsenic compounds in urine by flow-injection atomic-absorption spectrometry. Talanta 1992; 39:469-474.
    150) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    151) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    152) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    153) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    154) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    155) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    156) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    231) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    232) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    233) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    234) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    235) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    236) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    237) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    238) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    239) Nordstrom S: Hereditas 1979; 90:297-302.
    240) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1993; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    241) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    242) Offergelt JA, Roels H, & Buchet JP: Relation between airborne arsenic trioxide and urinary excretion of inorganic arsenic and its methylated metabolites. Br J Ind Med 1992; 49:387-393.
    243) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    244) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    245) Pepin J, Milord F, & Guern C: Trial of prednisolone for prevention of melarsoprol-induced encephalopathy in gambiense sleeping sickness. Lancet 1989; 1:1246-1250.
    246) Perticone F, Ceravolo R, & Cuccurullo O: Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in acquired long QT syndrome. Clin Drug Inverst 1997; 13:229-236.
    247) Peterson RG & Rumack BH: D-penicillamine therapy of acute arsenic poisoning. J Pediatr 1977; 91:661.
    248) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1997.
    249) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    250) Proctor NH, Hughes JP, & Fischman ML: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 2nd ed, JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1988, pp 80-82.
    251) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    252) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    253) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    254) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    255) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    256) Product Information: magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate IV, IM injection, solution. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2009.
    257) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    258) Product Information: procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2011.
    259) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    260) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1993; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    261) Rahman M, Tondel M, & Ahmad SA: Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:198-203.
    262) Rahman M, Tondel M, & Ahmad SA: Hypertension and arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Hypertension 1999; 33:74-78.
    263) Rahman M, Wingren G, & Axelson O: Diabetes mellitus among Swedish art glass workers--an effect of arsenic exposure?. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996; 22:146-149.
    264) Ratnasamy C, Rossique-Gonzalez M, & Young ML: Pharmacological therapy in children with atrioventricular reentry: which drug?. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):753-761.
    265) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    266) Renwick JH, Harrington JM, & Waldron HA: Long-term effects of acute arsenical poisoning. J Soc Occup Med 1981; 31:144-147.
    267) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1987, pp 308.
    268) Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY, 1993.
    269) Schoolmeester WL & White DR: Arsenic poisoning. South Med J 1980; 73:198-208.
    270) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    271) Selzer PM & Ancel MA: Chronic arsenic poisoning masquerading as pernicious anemia. West J Med 1983; 139:219-220.
    272) Shum S, Skarbovig J, & Habersang R: Acute lethal arsenite poisoning in mice: effect of treatment with N-acetylcysteine, D-penicillamine and dimercaprol on survival time. Vet Human Toxicol 1981; 23(Suppl 1):39-42.
    273) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985, pp 86-90.
    274) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    275) Smith AH, Goyolea M, & Haque R: Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of Northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147:660-669.
    276) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    277) Smith WM & Gallagher JJ: "Les torsades de pointes": an unusual ventricular arrhythmia. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:578-584.
    278) Snider TH, Wientjes MG, & Joiner RL: Arsenic distribution in rabbits after lewisite administration and treatment with British anti-lewisite (BAL). Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990; 14:262-272.
    279) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    280) St Peter J, Gross C, & Victoria BE: Ventricular fibrillation caused by arsenic poisoning. Am J Dis Child 1970; 120:367-371.
    281) Stohrer G: Arch Toxicol 1991; 65:525-531.
    282) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    283) Tabocova S, Hunter ES 3rd, & Gladen BC: Developmental toxicity of inorganic arsenic in whole embryo: culture oxidation state, dose, time, and gestational age dependence. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1996; 138:298-307.
    284) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    285) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    286) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    287) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    288) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    289) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    290) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    291) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    292) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    293) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    294) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    295) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    296) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    297) Vaziri ND, Upham T, & Barton CH: Hemodialysis clearance of arsenic. Clin Toxicol 1980; 17:451-456.
    298) Wagner SL & Weswig P: Arsenic in blood and urine of forest workers as indices of exposure to cacodylic acid. Arch Environ Health 1974; 28:77-79.
    299) Wagner SL, Maliner JS, & Morton WE: Skin cancer and arsenical intoxication from well water. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115:1205-1207.
    300) Walsh EP , Saul JP , Sholler GF , et al: Evaluation of a staged treatment protocol for rapid automatic junctional tachycardia after operation for congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(5):1046-1053.
    301) Watson WA, Veltri JC, & Metcalf TJ: Acute arsenic exposure treated with oral D-penicillamine. Vet Human Toxicol 1981; 23:164-166.
    302) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    303) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    304) Woody NC & Kometani JT: BAL in the treatment of arsenic ingestion of children. Pediatr 1948; 1:372-378.
    305) Zaloga GP, Deal J, & Spurling T: Case report: unusual manifestations of arsenic intoxication. Am J Med Sci 1970; 289:210-214.
    306) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.