MOBILE VIEW  | 

OXALIC ACID

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Oxalic acid, the simplest dicarboxylic acid, is a potentially toxic chemical which is synthesized commercially and is also naturally present as a salt in many plants. It forms two series of salts: a neutral, soluble species (with sodium, iron, lithium, or potassium) and an insoluble acid species (with calcium or magnesium). Oxalic acid is a relatively strong acid, and forms a white, dihydrate precipitate. It may be encountered in industry and at home as cleaning and bleaching agents.

Specific Substances

    1) Ethanediolic acid
    2) Dicarboxylic acid
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C2H2O4 C2O4H2 HOOC-COOH (COOH)2.2H20 HOOCCOOH.2H20

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) It is available commercially as the dihydrate (Ashford, 1994).
    2) Oxalic acid is available in the following grades (Lewis, 1993):
    1) Technical (crystals)
    2) Technical (powder)
    3) Chemically Pure
    B) SOURCES
    1) It occurs naturally in plants and vegetables such as wood sorrel, rhubarb, and spinach. Alkali extraction of sawdust and the metabolism of many molds will also produce oxalic acid. It is manufactured by the reaction of carbon monoxide and sodium hydroxide or the reaction of sodium formate and sodium hydroxide or sodium formate and sodium carbonate (Budavari, 1996; Lewis, 1993).
    2) Plants which contain high endogenous levels of oxalic acid, such as halogeton, mangels, and soursob, may be dangerous to grazing animals. The risk of toxicity is greatest during the leafy stage of growth when the oxalate content is the highest (HSDB , 1997).
    C) USES
    1) Oxalic acid is used in paint, stain and varnish removers, rust and ink stain removers, and ceramics. It is used in general metal and equipment cleaning, wood cleaning, process engraving, rare-earth processing, printing and dyeing, bleaching, textile finishing, chemical synthesis, making glucose from starch, leather tanning, and photography. It is also used in the manufacture of oxalates, and in the rubber manufacturing, lithographic, pharmaceutical, and paper industries; as a laboratory reagent, purifying agent, stripping agent, reducing agent, condensing agent in organic chemistry, a chemical intermediate, and a catalyst; and for purifying methanol, decolorizing crude glycerol, and stabilizing hydrocyanic acid (Budavari, 1996) Hathaway, 1996; (Ashford, 1994; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Lewis, 1993).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Oxalic acid, the simplest dicarboxylic acid, is a potentially toxic chemical which is synthesized commercially and is also naturally present as a salt in many plants. Please refer to "PLANTS-OXALATES" for information on exposure to plants containing oxalates. Oxalic acid is used in paint, stain and varnish removers, rust and ink stain removers, and ceramics. It is also used in general metal and equipment cleaning, wood cleaning, process engraving, rare-earth processing, printing and dyeing, bleaching, textile finishing, chemical synthesis, making glucose from starch, leather tanning, and photography.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Oxalic acid forms two series of salts: a neutral, soluble species (with sodium, iron, lithium, or potassium) and an insoluble acid species (with calcium or magnesium). Oxalic acid is a relatively strong acid, and forms a white, dihydrate precipitate. Ingestion of oxalic acid can cause severe local corrosive effects, with chemical burns of the mucous membranes and eventual ulceration of the oral and pharyngeal cavities. The exposed mucous membranes often have a white discoloration. Systemic toxic effects are due to two mechanisms: Oxalate complexes with calcium, causing hypocalcemia. Calcium oxalate precipitates in the renal tubules and vasculature, resulting in renal failure.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Oxalic acid may be encountered in industry and at home as cleaning and bleaching agents.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Ocular, respiratory tract, and dermal irritation, oral swelling, drooling, vomiting, and diarrhea may occur following exposure to oxalic acid. Systemic exposure can cause signs of hypocalcemia (ie, increased deep tendon reflexes, cramps, paresthesias, muscle twitching) or renal injury (ie, hematuria, oliguria, renal calculi, elevated serum creatinine).
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Acute ingestion of large amounts (high concentrations) of oxalic acid can cause severe oral swelling, epigastric pain, persistent vomiting, and profuse diarrhea. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage and perforation have also been reported. Hypotension and hypovolemic shock secondary to profound gastrointestinal fluid losses may occur. Severe hypocalcemia may cause cardiac dysrhythmias or seizures. Severe renal injury may cause anuric renal failure. Metabolic acidosis may also occur in severe cases. Corneal damage and skin ulceration have been reported with prolonged exposure. Rare cases or hepatic necrosis, liver failure, and pneumonitis have also been reported.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for oxalic acid in humans.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the possible carcinogenic activity of oxalic acid in humans.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Plasma oxalic acid concentrations are not clinically useful.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    C) Obtain urinalysis; monitor urine output, serum calcium, and renal function (BUN, creatinine) in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor arterial blood gases, pulse oximetry, and pulmonary function tests, and obtain a chest x-ray in any patient with respiratory symptoms.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    F) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    G) Monitor hepatic enzymes in symptomatic patients.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) Please refer to "PLANTS-OXALATES" for information on exposure to plants containing oxalates.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Do not induce emesis. Following an ingestion, rinse mouth immediately and administer milk or water. Monitor for evidence of severe symptoms (ie, severe pain, drooling, or difficulty swallowing). Oral analgesics may be necessary for pain. Antihistamines, inhaled beta agonists, corticosteroids may be necessary to treat laryngeal swelling or edema. Administer intravenous fluids as necessary to maintain hydration. Monitor urine output. Early (within 12 hours) gastrointestinal endoscopy should be considered to evaluate for burns. Perform barium swallow or repeat endoscopy several weeks after ingestion (sooner if difficulty swallowing) to evaluate for stricture formation.
    C) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Monitor respiratory effort; airway support may be needed in patients that develop difficulty swallowing, drooling or evidence of glossitis or laryngeal edema following exposure to oxalic acid. Early bronchoscopy should be considered in patients with respiratory distress or upper airway edema. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur. Intravenous administration of calcium gluconate or calcium chloride may be required for significant hypocalcemia. Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia. Hemodialysis is indicated in renal failure. Early surgical consultation should be considered for patients with severe burns, large deliberate ingestions, or signs, symptoms or laboratory findings concerning for tissue necrosis or perforation.
    D) DECONTAMINATION
    1) INGESTION: Do not induce emesis. In patients without vomiting or respiratory distress who are able to swallow, dilute with 4 to 8 ounces of milk/water if possible shortly after ingestion; then NPO until after endoscopy. Activated charcoal is not recommended.
    2) OCULAR: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    3) DERMAL: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids plus systemic sympathomimetic/antihistaminic agents.
    4) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    E) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway management may be necessary in patients who develop upper airway edema. Surgical airway (cricothyrotomy or tracheostomy) may be necessary in patients with severe upper airway edema.
    F) CORTICOSTEROIDS
    1) The use of corticosteroids to prevent stricture formation is controversial. Corticosteroids should not be used in patients with grade I or grade III injury, as there is no evidence that they are effective. Evidence for grade II burns is conflicting, and the risk of perforation and infection is increased with steroid use, so routine use is not recommended.
    G) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    H) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is indicated in patients with renal failure.
    I) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic or mild oral pain/irritation can be managed at home. Any increase in pain or evidence of drooling requires immediate further evaluation.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with a corrosive acid ingestion should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation. Any patient who develops drooling, difficulty swallowing or more than mild symptoms (ie, ongoing or severe pain) should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment. If symptoms resolve completely in the emergency department, the patient may be discharged to home following psychiatric clearance as needed. Patients with an endoscopic evaluation that demonstrates no burns or only minor grade I burns, and who can tolerate oral intake can be discharged home.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, and those with endoscopically demonstrated grade II or higher burns should be admitted. Patients with respiratory distress, grade III burns, acidosis, hemodynamic instability, or gastrointestinal bleeding should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Patients who present with severe symptoms (ie, significant drooling or laryngeal swelling, respiratory distress, seizure activity, renal impairment, mental status depression) should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Also, admit patients with persistent symptoms that have not responded to therapy.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a regional Poison Center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or for whom diagnosis is unclear.
    J) PITFALLS
    1) The absence of oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the possibility of significant esophageal burns.
    2) Patients may have severe tissue necrosis and impending perforation requiring early surgical intervention without having severe hypotension, rigid abdomen, or radiographic evidence of intraperitoneal air.
    3) Patients with any evidence of upper airway involvement require early airway management before airway edema progresses.
    K) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Ingested soluble oxalates are poorly absorbed unless the bowel is compromised with a disease process such as inflammatory bowel disease. Absorption is best in the small bowel and least in the large intestine. In normal adults approximately 2% to 5% of an ingested dose is absorbed. Normal tissue concentrations of oxalate are as follows. Brain 0.6 mg/kg, liver 2.3 mg/kg, kidney 4 mg/kg. Oxalic acid undergoes little to no protein binding under normal physiologic conditions. Excretion of oxalate salts is urinary, and peaks approximately 4 hours postingestion and persists for up to 14 hours at high concentrations. Up to 99% of an intravenous dose is excreted in the urine after 36 hours.
    L) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Other agents that may produce localized swelling or hypersensitivity reactions. Alkaline corrosive ingestion, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or perforated viscus.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    B) INHALATION: Administer oxygen. If respiratory symptoms develop obtain chest x-ray, monitor pulse oximetry and/or blood gases. Treat bronchospasm with inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonists. If acute lung injury develops, consider PEEP. Evaluate for esophageal, dermal and eye burns as indicated.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    B) CAUSTIC EYE DECONTAMINATION: Immediately irrigate each affected eye with copious amounts of water or sterile 0.9% saline for about 30 minutes. Irrigating volumes up to 20 L or more have been used to neutralize the pH. After this initial period of irrigation, the corneal pH may be checked with litmus paper and a brief external eye exam performed. Continue direct copious irrigation with sterile 0.9% saline until the conjunctival fornices are free of particulate matter and returned to pH neutrality (pH 7.4). Once irrigation is complete, a full eye exam should be performed with careful attention to the possibility of perforation.
    C) EYE ASSESSMENT: The extent of eye injury (degree of corneal opacification and perilimbal whitening) may not be apparent for 48 to 72 hours after the burn.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and irrigate exposed areas with copious amounts of water. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists.
    2) Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids plus systemic sympathomimetic/antihistaminic agents.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Oral exposure to oxalic acid can be lethal at doses in the range of 15 to 30 grams. In fatal cases, death usually occurs within several hours. As little as 5 grams has been lethal by ingestion. Death within 5 minutes of IV administration of 1.2 grams of sodium oxalate has been reported. A woman developed acute renal failure and severe metabolic acidosis after ingesting about 12.5 g of 70% oxalic acid mixed in a glass of water. She recovered following supportive care, including hemodialysis.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Oxalic acid, the simplest dicarboxylic acid, is a potentially toxic chemical which is synthesized commercially and is also naturally present as a salt in many plants. Please refer to "PLANTS-OXALATES" for information on exposure to plants containing oxalates. Oxalic acid is used in paint, stain and varnish removers, rust and ink stain removers, and ceramics. It is also used in general metal and equipment cleaning, wood cleaning, process engraving, rare-earth processing, printing and dyeing, bleaching, textile finishing, chemical synthesis, making glucose from starch, leather tanning, and photography.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Oxalic acid forms two series of salts: a neutral, soluble species (with sodium, iron, lithium, or potassium) and an insoluble acid species (with calcium or magnesium). Oxalic acid is a relatively strong acid, and forms a white, dihydrate precipitate. Ingestion of oxalic acid can cause severe local corrosive effects, with chemical burns of the mucous membranes and eventual ulceration of the oral and pharyngeal cavities. The exposed mucous membranes often have a white discoloration. Systemic toxic effects are due to two mechanisms: Oxalate complexes with calcium, causing hypocalcemia. Calcium oxalate precipitates in the renal tubules and vasculature, resulting in renal failure.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Oxalic acid may be encountered in industry and at home as cleaning and bleaching agents.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Ocular, respiratory tract, and dermal irritation, oral swelling, drooling, vomiting, and diarrhea may occur following exposure to oxalic acid. Systemic exposure can cause signs of hypocalcemia (ie, increased deep tendon reflexes, cramps, paresthesias, muscle twitching) or renal injury (ie, hematuria, oliguria, renal calculi, elevated serum creatinine).
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Acute ingestion of large amounts (high concentrations) of oxalic acid can cause severe oral swelling, epigastric pain, persistent vomiting, and profuse diarrhea. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage and perforation have also been reported. Hypotension and hypovolemic shock secondary to profound gastrointestinal fluid losses may occur. Severe hypocalcemia may cause cardiac dysrhythmias or seizures. Severe renal injury may cause anuric renal failure. Metabolic acidosis may also occur in severe cases. Corneal damage and skin ulceration have been reported with prolonged exposure. Rare cases or hepatic necrosis, liver failure, and pneumonitis have also been reported.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) BURNS: Ocular exposures to oxalic acid can produce burns. Brief splash exposures usually result in epithelial damage with recovery. Experimental application for prolonged periods has resulted in substantial corneal damage (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    B) RETINAL LESIONS with systemic oxalosis, deposits of calcium oxalate, can form in the retinal pigment epithelium, which produces yellow-white punctate lesions visible on the funduscopic exam. Oxalosis has been produced in humans with prolonged inhalation exposure to methoxyflurane (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) BURNS: Oxalic acid has principally a corrosive action on the mucous membranes, manifesting as a burning sensation and pain in the mouth and pharynx which may be accompanied by difficulty of swallowing and eventually in ulceration of the oral and pharyngeal cavities. Exposed mucous membranes become white (Hamilton et al, 1999).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension may occur after ingestion of concentrated oxalic acid secondary to corrosive injury to the gastrointestinal tract with hemorrhagic gastroenteritis (Gawarammana et al, 2009). Patients may develop a weak pulse, hypotension, cardiac dysrhythmias and asystole in severe cases (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012; Hamilton et al, 1999).
    B) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) As serum calcium levels decline with hypovolemia and poor coronary perfusion, cardiac dysrhythmias may occur and can lead to asystole (Hamilton et al, 1999). Bradycardia developed in one patient (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chronic inhalation of vapors may cause inflammation of the respiratory tract.

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Symptoms may include drowsiness, stupor, CNS depression and/or coma.
    b) Drowsiness developed in one patient (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012).
    B) SPASMODIC MOVEMENT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Muscle twitching, cramps and exaggerated deep tendon reflexes may be noted.
    C) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) HYPOCALCEMIA may lead to muscular fasciculation, tetany, and rapid onset of seizures (Hamilton et al, 1999).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The patient may experience epigastric pain and hematemesis because of hemorrhagic gastritis, which can develop due to the corrosive action of oxalic acid on mucous membranes. Severe vomiting and profuse diarrhea may develop early (Hamilton et al, 1999; Gosselin et al, 1984; Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012). In patients who ingest dilute solutions, the onset of symptoms is delayed and gastroenteritis may be absent. Gastric perforation and stricture are uncommon.
    b) CASE SERIES - In Sri Lanka, intentional ingestion of a laundry detergent containing a sachet each of 12.5 g of oxalic acid and potassium permanganate 1.2 g resulted in 115 cases of toxicity with 18 fatalities. Gastrointestinal symptoms developed within 24 hours of ingestion. Of the individuals that ingested oxalic acid only, a case fatality ratio of 25.4% was observed, while a case fatality ratio of 9.8% occurred in patients ingesting both oxalic acid and potassium permanganate. No deaths occurred in the potassium permanganate group. Most deaths occurred within one hour of ingestion. Postmortem exam revealed macroscopic evidence of superficial erosions of the esophagus, oropharynx and larynx in all cases (Gawarammana et al, 2009).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man presented with a severe sore throat, tachypnea, nausea, and vomiting 4 hours after ingesting 30 mL of oolong tea mixed with oxalic acid. Arterial blood gases revealed anion gap high metabolic acidosis. On day 3, upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy revealed erosive esophagitis from the midthoracic esophagus to lower esophagus, erosive gastritis and thickening of the gastric wall of the gastric body. Despite supportive care, he developed acute renal failure; however, following hemodialysis, he gradually improved and was discharged home on day 31 (Yamamoto et al, 2011).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEPATIC NECROSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Calcium oxalate crystals can be deposited in the liver resulting in hepatic necrosis and failure in severe cases. Milder cases may manifest as elevated serum liver enzymes (Hamilton et al, 1999).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Oxalates are excreted via the kidney and the oxalic acid crystals may cause damage to renal tubules. Injury to the kidneys may result in oliguria, anuria, and hematuria. If injury is severe enough, the patient may develop uremia.
    b) CASE REPORT: Acute tubular necrosis developed in a 47-year-old male following an intentional ingestion of 150 grams of sodium oxalate. Within 24 hours of the ingestion his serum creatinine had risen to 404 mcmol/L (normal 50 to 120 mcmol/L) and urea was 13.1 mmol/L (normal 2.5 to 6.7 mcmol/L), with oliguria. Hemodialysis was started, with 4 sessions over 5 days. Creatinine peaked on day 9 (1202 mcmol/L). By day 14 the patient was in the recovery stage. At his 2 month follow-up, recovery was complete with the exception of an elevated creatinine of 150 mcmol/L (Hamilton et al, 1999).
    c) CASE SERIES: In Sri Lanka, intentional ingestion of a laundry detergent containing a sachet each of 12.5 g oxalic acid and 1.2 g potassium permanganate resulted in 115 cases of toxicity with 18 fatalities. Of the individuals that ingested a sublethal dose of oxalic acid and potassium permanganate (n=51), acute renal failure was observed 2 to 3 days after exposure. Median serum creatinine was 1.7 (Interquartile range: 0.91-4.4). Most recovered with supportive care (Gawarammana et al, 2009).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man presented with a severe sore throat, tachypnea, nausea and vomiting 4 hours after ingesting 30 mL of oolong tea mixed with oxalic acid. Arterial blood gases revealed anion gap high metabolic acidosis with a pH of 7.329, PaCO2 32.5 torr, PaO2 80.2 torr, BE -7.9 mmol/L, HCO3 16.6 mmol/L, and an anion gap of 18 mEq/L. Laboratory analysis revealed elevated levels of white blood count (21,700/mcL), C-reactive protein (1.89 mg/dL), and lactate (50 mg/dL). Despite supportive care, his renal function deteriorated gradually and he developed acute renal failure on day 4 (serum creatinine: 4.7 mg/dL; BUN: 41 mg/dL; creatinine clearance: 6). On day 6, calcium oxalate was found in his urine. His serum creatinine increased to 9.4 mg/dL 3 days later, but decreased following hemodialysis. A renal biopsy at this time revealed calcium oxalate deposits in some renal tubules, and the renal tubular epithelial cells had swelling and necrosis. Following supportive care, including further hemodialysis, he gradually improved and he was discharged home on day 31 (Yamamoto et al, 2011).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old woman developed abdominal pain and profuse vomiting immediately after ingesting about 12.5 g of 70% oxalic acid mixed in a glass of water. She presented 4 hours postingestion with drowsiness, bradycardia (HR 50 beats/min), and a blood pressure of 80/60 mmHg. Despite supportive therapy, she continued to have vomiting with 2 episodes of blood stained vomitus, and worsening generalized edema with a reduction of urine output (about 20 mL/hr) by day 3. Laboratory results revealed elevated serum creatinine (up to 704 mcmol/dL) and BUN concentrations (up to 43.5 mmol/dL). At this time, she had fever (temperature 99.6 degrees C), nausea, and mild tachypnea, but stable vital signs. Arterial blood gases revealed a metabolic acidosis (pH 7.328, PaCO2 33.2 mmHg, PaO2 84.2 mmHg, BE -6.2, HCO3 18.9 mmol/L). Despite undergoing hemodialysis on day 3 and an initial symptomatic improvement, her urine output remained low and post dialysis arterial blood gases showed a respiratory alkalosis (pH 7.479, PaCO2 34.9 mmHg, PaO2 91.9 mmHg, BE 2.5, HCO3 26.2 mmol/L). On day 7, she underwent a second hemodialysis, resulting in increasing urine output, but serum creatinine concentration remained high. On day 8, renal biopsy showed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with diffuse moderate acute tubular damage with refractile crystals seen in some tubules, suggesting oxalic acid poisoning. Following further supportive care, her condition gradually improved. Another laboratory analysis revealed a mild normochromic normocytic anemia (Hb: 9.1 g/dL) with normal WBC and platelets. On day 28, she was discharged home and a normal serum creatinine concentration was observed on follow-up day 28 (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012).
    B) KIDNEY STONE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Oxalate complexes with calcium and calcium oxalate crystals are deposited in the kidney following acute overdoses. On urine examination, typical birefringent crystals of calcium oxalate, which exist in both the needle-like and envelope-shaped dimorphic forms, may be seen. Renal tubular damage may occur. Large renal calculi may require surgical removal or lithotripsy (Woolf, 1993).
    b) Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is metabolized to oxalates. Chronic ingestion of large amounts of ascorbic acid may result in the development of renal disease through the deposition of calcium oxalate in the kidneys. Ascorbic acid supplementation in dialysis patients results in hyperoxalemia (Ono, 1986). Therefore, patients with compromised renal function are at greater risk following oxalic acid or oxalate ingestion.
    c) CASE SERIES: A study of railroad car cleaners in Norway who were heavily exposed to oxalic acid solutions and vapors revealed a 53.3% prevalence of urolithiasis, compared to a rate of 11.9% among unexposed workers from the same company (Laerum & Aarseth, 1985).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Metabolic acidosis may occur in severe cases (Hamilton et al, 1999).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man presented with a severe sore throat, tachypnea, nausea and vomiting 4 hours after ingesting 30 mL of oolong tea mixed with oxalic acid. Arterial blood gases revealed anion gap high metabolic acidosis with a pH of 7.329, PaCO2 32.5 torr, PaO2 80.2 torr, BE -7.9 mmol/L, HCO3 16.6 mmol/L, and an anion gap of 18 mEq/L. Laboratory analysis revealed elevated levels of white blood count (21,700/mcL), C-reactive protein (1.89 mg/dL), and lactate (50 mg/dL). Despite supportive care, his renal function deteriorated gradually and he developed acute renal failure on day 4 (serum creatinine: 4.7 mg/dL; BUN: 41 mg/dL; creatinine clearance: 6). On day 6, calcium oxalate was found in his urine. His serum creatinine increased to 9.4 mg/dL 3 days later, but decreased following hemodialysis. A renal biopsy at this time revealed calcium oxalate deposits in some renal tubules, and the renal tubular epithelial cells had swelling and necrosis. Following supportive care, including further hemodialysis, he gradually improved and he was discharged home on day 31 (Yamamoto et al, 2011).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old woman developed abdominal pain and profuse vomiting immediately after ingesting about 12.5 g of 70% oxalic acid mixed in a glass of water. She presented 4 hours postingestion with drowsiness, bradycardia (HR 50 beats/min), and a blood pressure of 80/60 mmHg. Despite supportive therapy, she continued to have vomiting with 2 episodes of blood stained vomitus, and worsening generalized edema with a reduction of urine output (about 20 mL/hr) by day 3. Laboratory results revealed elevated serum creatinine (up to 704 mcmol/dL) and BUN concentrations (up to 43.5 mmol/dL). At this time, she had fever (temperature 99.6 degrees C), nausea, and mild tachypnea, but stable vital signs. Arterial blood gases revealed a metabolic acidosis (pH 7.328, PaCO2 33.2 mmHg, PaO2 84.2 mmHg, BE -6.2, HCO3 18.9 mmol/L). Despite undergoing hemodialysis on day 3 and an initial symptomatic improvement, her urine output remained low and post dialysis arterial blood gases showed a respiratory alkalosis (pH 7.479, PaCO2 34.9 mmHg, PaO2 91.9 mmHg, BE 2.5, HCO3 26.2 mmol/L). On day 7, she underwent a second hemodialysis, resulting in increasing urine output, but serum creatinine concentration remained high. On day 8, renal biopsy showed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with diffuse moderate acute tubular damage with refractile crystals seen in some tubules, suggesting oxalic acid poisoning. Following further supportive care, her condition gradually improved. Another laboratory analysis revealed a mild normochromic normocytic anemia (Hb: 9.1 g/dL) with normal WBC and platelets. On day 28, she was discharged home and a normal serum creatinine concentration was observed on follow-up day 28 (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Oxalate is an irritant, corrosive to the skin, and may cause dermatitis. Skin lesions begin with epithelial cracking and the formation of slow-healing ulcers. The fingers may appear cyanotic.
    B) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rare chemical burns may occur from oxalic acid and may cause hypocalcemia (Saydjari et al, 1986).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GANGRENE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Gangrene has occurred in the hands of people working with oxalic acid solutions without rubber gloves. The hands of one case were described as follows: mottled, cyanotic appearance, tense and immobile, cold, and with very little sensation (Grolnick, 1929).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for oxalic acid in humans.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Increased sperm abnormalities were seen in the second generation of mice administered 0.2 percent oxalic acid in the drinking water (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Oxalic acid crossed the placenta in sheep and caused kidney damage in the fetus, but did not cause abortions (Schiefer, 1976). When given orally to rats at doses of 2.5 and 5 percent in the diet for 70 days, it disturbed the estrus cycle (Goldman, 1977).
    2) Oxalic acid caused kidney disturbances in fetal rats when given orally to the dams, but did not cause abortions or gross malformations (Sheikh-Omar & Schiefer, 1980).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS144-62-7 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the possible carcinogenic activity of oxalic acid in humans.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Plasma oxalic acid concentrations are not clinically useful.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    C) Obtain urinalysis; monitor urine output, serum calcium, and renal function (BUN, creatinine) in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor arterial blood gases, pulse oximetry, and pulmonary function tests, and obtain a chest x-ray in any patient with respiratory symptoms.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    F) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    G) Monitor hepatic enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Obtain urinalysis; monitor urine output, serum calcium, and renal function (BUN, creatinine) in symptomatic patients.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    3) Monitor hepatic enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) Oxalic acid can be measured in the urine by colorimetry. The normal upper limit is 40 to 50 mg/24 hours.
    2) Average serum oxalate concentration in 20 healthy subjects was 1.4 mg/L (Baselt & Cravey, 1989).
    B) URINALYSIS
    1) Urinalysis is indicated.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.

Methods

    A) OTHER
    1) Plasma oxalic acid concentrations are not clinically useful.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, and those with endoscopically demonstrated grade II or higher burns should be admitted. Patients with respiratory distress, grade III burns, acidosis, hemodynamic instability, or gastrointestinal bleeding should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Patients who present with severe symptoms (ie, significant drooling or laryngeal swelling, respiratory distress, seizure activity, renal impairment, mental status depression) should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Also, admit patients with persistent symptoms that have not responded to therapy.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic or mild oral pain/irritation can be managed at home. Any increase in pain or evidence of drooling requires immediate further evaluation.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a regional Poison Center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or for whom diagnosis is unclear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with a corrosive acid ingestion should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation. Any patient who develops drooling, difficulty swallowing or more than mild symptoms (ie, ongoing or severe pain) should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment. If symptoms resolve completely in the emergency department, the patient may be discharged to home following psychiatric clearance as needed. Patients with an endoscopic evaluation that demonstrates no burns or only minor grade I burns, and who can tolerate oral intake can be discharged home.

Monitoring

    A) Plasma oxalic acid concentrations are not clinically useful.
    B) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    C) Obtain urinalysis; monitor urine output, serum calcium, and renal function (BUN, creatinine) in symptomatic patients.
    D) Monitor arterial blood gases, pulse oximetry, and pulmonary function tests, and obtain a chest x-ray in any patient with respiratory symptoms.
    E) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    F) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    G) Monitor hepatic enzymes in symptomatic patients.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) INGESTION: Do not induce emesis. In patients without vomiting or respiratory distress who are able to swallow, dilute with 4 to 8 ounces of milk/water if possible shortly after ingestion; then NPO until after endoscopy. Activated charcoal is not recommended.
    B) OCULAR: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    C) DERMAL: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. Treat dermal irritation or burns with standard topical therapy. Patients developing dermal hypersensitivity reactions may require treatment with systemic or topical corticosteroids plus systemic sympathomimetic/antihistaminic agents.
    D) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Do not induce emesis. In patients without vomiting or respiratory distress who are able to swallow, dilute with 4 to 8 ounces of milk/water if possible shortly after ingestion; then NPO until after endoscopy. Activated charcoal is not recommended.
    B) DILUTION
    1) DILUTION: If no respiratory compromise is present, administer milk or water as soon as possible after ingestion. Dilution may only be helpful if performed in the first seconds to minutes after ingestion. The ideal amount is unknown; no more than 8 ounces (240 mL) in adults and 4 ounces (120 mL) in children is recommended to minimize the risk of vomiting (Caravati, 2004).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Do not induce emesis. Following an ingestion, rinse mouth immediately and administer milk or water. Monitor for evidence of severe symptoms (ie, severe pain, drooling, or difficulty swallowing). Oral analgesics may be necessary for pain. Antihistamines, inhaled beta agonists, corticosteroids may be necessary to treat laryngeal swelling or edema. Administer intravenous fluids as necessary to maintain hydration. Monitor urine output. Early (within 12 hours) gastrointestinal endoscopy should be considered to evaluate for burns. Perform barium swallow or repeat endoscopy several weeks after ingestion (sooner if difficulty swallowing) to evaluate for stricture formation.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Monitor respiratory effort; airway support may be needed in patients that develop difficulty swallowing, drooling or evidence of glossitis or laryngeal edema following exposure to oxalic acid. Early bronchoscopy should be considered in patients with respiratory distress or upper airway edema. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur. Intravenous administration of calcium gluconate or calcium chloride may be required for significant hypocalcemia. Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia. Hemodialysis is indicated in renal failure. Early surgical consultation should be considered for patients with severe burns, large deliberate ingestions, or signs, symptoms or laboratory findings concerning for tissue necrosis or perforation.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Plasma oxalic acid concentrations are not clinically useful.
    2) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    3) Obtain urinalysis; monitor urine output, serum calcium, and renal function (BUN, creatinine) in symptomatic patients.
    4) Monitor arterial blood gases, pulse oximetry, and pulmonary function tests, and obtain a chest x-ray in any patient with respiratory symptoms.
    5) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring.
    6) Monitor serum electrolytes in patients with significant vomiting and/or diarrhea.
    7) Monitor hepatic enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    C) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    D) HYPOCALCEMIA
    1) Intravenous administration of calcium gluconate or calcium chloride may be required if hypocalcemia or hypocalcemic tetany occur.
    E) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE
    1) There is little information regarding the use of endoscopy, corticosteroids and surgery after ingestion of high concentrations of oxalic acid. The following information is derived from experience with other acids. These modalities are not likely to be necessary in patients who are asymptomatic after ingestion of low concentration products.
    2) SUMMARY: Obtain consultation concerning endoscopy as soon as possible and perform endoscopy within the first 24 hours when indicated.
    3) INDICATIONS: Most studies associating the presence or absence of gastrointestinal burns with signs and symptoms after caustic ingestion have involved primarily alkaline ingestions. Because acid ingestion may cause severe gastric injury with fewer associated initial signs and symptoms, endoscopic evaluation is recommended in any patient with a definite history of ingestion of a strong acid, even if asymptomatic.
    4) RISKS: Numerous large case series attest to the relative safety and utility of early endoscopy in the management of caustic ingestion.
    a) REFERENCES: Gaudreault et al, 1983; Symbas et al, 1983; Crain et al, 1984; (Schild, 1985; Moazam et al, 1987; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989; Previtera et al, 1990; Zargar et al, 1991; Vergauwen et al, 1991; Gorman et al, 1992; Nuutinen et al, 1994)
    5) The risk of perforation during endoscopy is minimized by (Zargar et al, 1991):
    a) Advancing across the cricopharynx under direct vision
    b) Gently advancing with minimal air insufflation
    c) Never retroverting or retroflexing the endoscope
    d) Using a pediatric flexible endoscope
    e) Using extreme caution in advancing beyond burn lesion areas
    f) Most authors recommend endoscopy within the first 24 hours of injury, not advancing the endoscope beyond areas of severe esophageal burns, and avoiding endoscopy during the subacute phase of healing when tissue slough increases the risk of perforation (5 to 15 days after ingestion) (Zargar et al, 1991).
    6) GRADING
    a) Several scales for grading caustic injury exist. The likelihood of complications such as strictures, obstruction, bleeding and perforation is related to the severity of the initial burn (Zargar et al, 1991):
    b) Grade 0 - Normal examination
    c) Grade 1 - Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa; strictures unlikely.
    d) Grade 2A - Friability, hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, whitish membranes, exudates and superficial ulcerations; strictures unlikely.
    e) Grade 2B - Grade 2A plus deep discreet or circumferential ulceration; strictures may develop.
    f) Grade 3A - Multiple ulcerations and small scattered areas of necrosis; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation, or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
    g) Grade 3B - Extensive necrosis through visceral wall; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation, or gastrointestinal bleeding are more likely than with 3A.
    7) FOLLOW UP - If burns are found, follow 10 to 20 days later with barium swallow or esophagram.
    F) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) CORROSIVE INGESTION/SUMMARY: The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of caustic ingestion is controversial. Most animal studies have involved alkali-induced injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973). Most human studies have been retrospective and generally involve more alkali than acid-induced injury and small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury.
    2) FIRST DEGREE BURNS: These burns generally heal well and rarely result in stricture formation (Zargar et al, 1989; Howell et al, 1992). Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in these patients (Howell et al, 1992).
    3) SECOND DEGREE BURNS: Some authors recommend corticosteroid treatment to prevent stricture formation in patients with a second degree, deep-partial thickness burn (Howell et al, 1992). However, no well controlled human study has documented efficacy. Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in patients with a second degree, superficial-partial thickness burn (Caravati, 2004; Howell et al, 1992).
    4) THIRD DEGREE BURNS: Some authors have recommended steroids in this group as well (Howell et al, 1992). A high percentage of patients with third degree burns go on to develop strictures with or without corticosteroid therapy and the risk of infection and perforation may be increased by corticosteroid use. Most authors feel that the risk outweighs any potential benefit and routine use is not recommended (Boukthir et al, 2004; Oakes et al, 1982; Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Include active gastrointestinal bleeding and evidence of gastric or esophageal perforation. Corticosteroids are thought to be ineffective if initiated more than 48 hours after a burn (Howell, 1987).
    6) DOSE: Administer daily oral doses of 0.1 milligram/kilogram of dexamethasone or 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram of prednisone. Continue therapy for a total of 3 weeks and then taper (Haller et al, 1971; Marshall, 1979). An alternative regimen in children is intravenous prednisolone 2 milligrams/kilogram/day followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks then tapered (Anderson et al, 1990).
    7) ANTIBIOTICS: Animal studies suggest that the addition of antibiotics can prevent the infectious complications associated with corticosteroid use in the setting of caustic burns. Antibiotics are recommended if corticosteroids are used or if perforation or infection is suspected. Agents that cover anaerobes and oral flora such as penicillin, ampicillin, or clindamycin are appropriate (Rosenberg et al, 1953).
    8) STUDIES
    a) ANIMAL
    1) Some animal studies have suggested that corticosteroid therapy may reduce the incidence of stricture formation after severe alkaline corrosive injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973a).
    2) Animals treated with steroids and antibiotics appear to do better than animals treated with steroids alone (Haller & Bachman, 1964).
    3) Other studies have shown no evidence of reduced stricture formation in steroid treated animals (Reyes et al, 1974). An increased rate of esophageal perforation related to steroid treatment has been found in animal studies (Knox et al, 1967).
    b) HUMAN
    1) Most human studies have been retrospective and/or uncontrolled and generally involve small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury. No study has proven a reduced incidence of stricture formation from steroid use in human caustic ingestions (Haller et al, 1971; Hawkins et al, 1980; Yarington & Heatly, 1963; Adam & Brick, 1982).
    2) META ANALYSIS
    a) Howell et al (1992), analyzed reports concerning 361 patients with corrosive esophageal injury published in the English language literature since 1956 (10 retrospective and 3 prospective studies). No patients with first degree burns developed strictures. Of 228 patients with second or third degree burns treated with corticosteroids and antibiotics, 54 (24%) developed strictures. Of 25 patients with similar burn severity treated without steroids or antibiotics, 13 (52%) developed strictures (Howell et al, 1992).
    b) Another meta-analysis of 10 studies found that in patients with second degree esophageal burns from caustics, the overall rate of stricture formation was 14.8% in patients who received corticosteroids compared with 36% in patients who did not receive corticosteroids (LoVecchio et al, 1996).
    c) Another study combined results of 10 papers evaluating therapy for corrosive esophageal injury in humans published between January 1991 and June 2004. There were a total of 572 patients, all patients received corticosteroids in 6 studies, in 2 studies no patients received steroids, and in 2 studies, treatment with and without corticosteroids was compared. Of 109 patients with grade 2 esophageal burns who were treated with corticosteroids, 15 (13.8%) developed strictures, compared with 2 of 32 (6.3%) patients with second degree burns who did not receive steroids (Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    3) Smaller studies have questioned the value of steroids (Ferguson et al, 1989; Anderson et al, 1990), thus they should be used with caution.
    4) Ferguson et al (1989) retrospectively compared 10 patients who did not receive antibiotics or steroids with 31 patients who received both antibiotics and steroids in a study of caustic ingestion and found no difference in the incidence of esophageal stricture between the two groups (Ferguson et al, 1989).
    5) A randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial involving 60 children with lye or acid induced esophageal injury did not find an effect of corticosteroids on the incidence of stricture formation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    a) These 60 children were among 131 patients who were managed and followed-up for ingestion of caustic material from 1971 through 1988; 88% of them were between 1 and 3 years old (Anderson et al, 1990).
    b) All patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy after being randomized to receive either no steroids or a course consisting initially of intravenous prednisolone (2 milligrams/kilogram per day) followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks prior to tapering and discontinuation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    c) Six (19%), 15 (48%), and 10 (32%) of those in the treatment group had first, second and third degree esophageal burns, respectively. In contrast, 13 (45%), 5 (17%), and 11 (38%) of the control group had the same levels of injury (Anderson et al, 1990).
    d) Ten (32%) of those receiving steroids and 11 (38%) of the control group developed strictures. Four (13%) of those receiving steroids and 7 (24%) of the control group required esophageal replacement. All but 1 of the 21 children who developed strictures had severe circumferential burns on initial esophagoscopy (Anderson et al, 1990).
    e) Because of the small numbers of patients in this study, it lacked the power to reliably detect meaningful differences in outcome between the treatment groups (Anderson et al, 1990).
    6) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of caustic ingestion in humans has been associated with gastric perforation (Cleveland et al, 1963) and fatal pulmonary embolism (Aceto et al, 1970).
    G) SURGICAL PROCEDURE
    1) In severe cases of gastrointestinal necrosis or perforation, emergent surgical consultation should be obtained. The need for gastric resection or laparotomy in the stable patient is controversial (Chodak & Passaro, 1978; Dilawari et al, 1984).
    2) LAPAROTOMY/LAPAROSCOPY - Early laparotomy or laparoscopy should be considered in patients with endoscopic evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns after acid ingestion to evaluate for the presence of transmural gastric or esophageal necrosis (Estrera et al, 1986; Meredith et al, 1988; Wu & Lai, 1993). Emergent laparotomy should be strongly considered in any patient with hypotension, altered mental status, or acidemia (Hovarth et al, 1991).
    a) STUDY - In a retrospective study of patients with extensive transmural gastroesophageal necrosis after caustic ingestion, all 4 patients treated in the conventional manner (endoscopy, steroids, antibiotics, and repeated evaluation for the occurrence of esophagogastric necrosis and perforation) died, while all 3 patients treated with early laparotomy and immediate esophagogastric resection survived (Estrera et al, 1986).
    b) Wu & Lai (1993) reported the results of emergency surgical resection of the alimentary tract in 28 patients who had extensive corrosive injuries due to the ingestion of acids or other caustics. Operative mortality was most frequently associated with sepsis. Non-fatal bleeding, infections, biliary or bronchial fistulas were other noted complications. Morbidity and mortality were related to the severity of the damage and the extent of surgery required.
    1) Immediate postoperative management included antibiotics, extensive respiratory care, tracheobronchial toilet, maintenance of fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance, and jejunostomy feeding or total parenteral nutrition.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    B) The pH of the conjunctival sac should be tested after irrigation and irrigation continued until it is no longer acidic.
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) INJURY OF GLOBE OF EYE
    1) EVALUATION
    a) ASSESSMENT CAUSTIC EYE BURNS: It may take 48 to 72 hours after the burn to assess correctly the degree of ocular damage (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    b) The 1965 Roper-Hall classification uses the size of the corneal epithelial defect, the degree of corneal opacification and extent of limbal ischemia to evaluate the extent of the chemical ocular injury (Brodovsky et al, 2000a; Singh et al, 2013):
    1) GRADE 1 (prognosis good): Corneal epithelial damage; no limbal ischemia.
    2) GRADE 2 (prognosis good): Cornea hazy; iris details visible, ischemia less than one-third of limbus.
    3) GRADE 3 (prognosis guarded): Total loss of corneal epithelium; stromal haze obscures iris details; ischemia of one-third to one-half of limbus.
    4) GRADE 4 (prognosis poor): Cornea opaque; iris and pupil obscured, ischemia affects more than one-half of limbus.
    c) A newer classification (Dua) is based on clock hour limbal involvement as well as a percentage of bulbar conjunctival involvement (Singh et al, 2013):
    1) GRADE 1 (prognosis very good): 0 clock hour of limbal involvement and 0% conjunctival involvement.
    2) GRADE 2 (prognosis good): Less than 3 clock hour of limbal involvement and less than 30% conjunctival involvement.
    3) GRADE 3 (prognosis good): Greater than 3 and up to 6 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 30% to 50% conjunctival involvement.
    4) GRADE 4 (prognosis good to guarded): Greater than 6 and up to 9 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 50% to 75% conjunctival involvement.
    5) GRADE 5 (prognosis guarded to poor): Greater than 9 and less than 12 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 75% and less than 100% conjunctival involvement.
    6) GRADE 6 (very poor): Total limbus (12 clock hour) involved and 100% conjunctival involvement.
    2) MEDICAL FACILITY IRRIGATION
    a) IRRIGATION: In a medical facility: Begin irrigation with copious amounts of water or sterile 0.9% saline, which ever is more rapidly available, immediately. Once irrigation has begun, instill a drop of local anesthetic for comfort; switching from water to slightly warmed sterile saline may also improve patient comfort (Ernst et al, 1998; Grant & Schuman, 1993a).
    b) Continue irrigation for at least an hour or until the superior and inferior cul-de-sacs have returned to neutrality, pH of 7.0 to 8.0, and remain so for 30 minutes after irrigation is discontinued (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    c) Search the conjunctival sac for solid particles and remove them while continuing irrigation (Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Emergent ophthalmologic consultation is needed in these cases.
    3) MINOR INJURY
    a) SUMMARY
    1) If ocular damage is minor, artificial tears/lubricants, topical cycloplegics, and antibiotics may be all that are needed.
    b) ARTIFICIAL TEARS
    1) To promote re-epithelization, preservative-free artificial tears/lubricants (eg, hyaluronic acid hourly) may be used (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    c) TOPICAL CYCLOPLEGIC
    1) Use to guard against development of posterior synechiae and ciliary spasm (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Cyclopentolate 0.5% or 1% eye drops may be administered 4 times daily to control pain (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    d) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
    1) An antibiotic ophthalmic ointment or drops should be used for as long as epithelial defects persist (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Topical erythromycin or tetracycline ointment may be used (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    e) PAIN CONTROL
    1) If pain control is required, oral or parenteral NSAIDs or narcotics are preferred to topical ocular anesthetics, which may cause local corneal epithelial damage if used repeatedly (Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). However, topical 0.5% proparacaine has been recommended (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    4) SEVERE INJURY
    a) SUMMARY
    1) If the damage is minor, the above may be all that is needed. For grade 3 or 4 injuries, one or more of the following may be used, only with ophthalmologic consultation: acetazolamide, topical timolol, topical steroids, citrate, ascorbate, EDTA, cysteine, NAC, penicillamine, tetracycline, or soft contact lenses.
    b) ARTIFICIAL TEARS
    1) To promote re-epithelization, preservative-free artificial tears/lubricants (eg, hyaluronic acid hourly) may be used (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    c) PAIN CONTROL
    1) If pain control is required, oral or parenteral NSAIDs or narcotics are preferred to topical ocular anesthetics, which may cause local corneal epithelial damage if used repeatedly (Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). However, topical 0.5% proparacaine has been recommended (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    d) CARBONIC ANHYDRASE INHIBITOR
    1) Acetazolamide (250 mg orally 4 times daily) may be given to control increased intraocular pressure (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    e) TOPICAL STEROIDS
    1) DOSE: Dexamethasone 0.1% ointment 4 times daily to reduce inflammation. If persistent epithelial defect is present, discontinue dexamethasone by day 14 to reduce the risk of stromal melt (Tuft & Shortt, 2009). Other sources suggest that corticosteroids should be stopped if the epithelium has not covered surface defects by 5 to 7 days (Grant & Schuman, 1993b).
    2) Topical prednisolone 0.5% has also been used. A further increase in corneoscleral melt may occur if topical steroids are used alone. In one study, topical prednisolone 0.5% was used in combination with topical ascorbate 10%; no increase in corneoscleral melt was observed when topical steroids were used until re-epithelization (Singh et al, 2013; Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    3) In one retrospective study, fluorometholone 1% drops were administered every 2 hours initially, then decreased to four times daily when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    f) ASCORBATE
    1) Oral or topical ascorbate may be used to promote epithelial healing and reduce the risk of stromal necrosis (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    2) DOSE: Ascorbate 10% 4 times daily topically or 1 g orally (2 g/day) (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    3) Ascorbate is needed for the formation of collagen and the concentration of ascorbate in the anterior chamber is decreased when the ciliary body is damaged by alkali burns (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Grant & Schuman, 1993b). In one retrospective study, ascorbate drops (10%) were administered every 2 hours, then decreased to 4 times a day when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete. These patients also received 500 mg of oral ascorbate 4 times daily, until discharge from the hospital (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    g) CITRATE
    1) Topical citrate may be used to promote epithelial healing and reduce the risk of stromal necrosis (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    2) DOSE: Potassium citrate 10% 4 times daily topically (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    3) Citrate chelates calcium, and thereby interferes with the harmful effects of neutrophil accumulation, such as release of proteolytic enzymes and superoxide free radicals, phagocytosis and ulceration (Grant & Schuman, 1993b). In one retrospective study, 10% citrate drops were administered every 2 hours, then decreased to 4 times a day when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete. These patients also received a urinary alkalinizer containing 720 mg of citric acid anhydrous and 630 mg of sodium citrate anhydrous 3 times daily, until discharge from the hospital (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    h) COLLAGENASE INHIBITORS
    1) Inhibitors of collagenase can inhibit collagenolytic activity, prevent stromal ulceration, and promote wound healing. Several effective agents, such as cysteine, n-acetylcysteine, sodium ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), calcium EDTA, penicillamine, and citrate, have been recommended (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Perry et al, 1993; Seedor et al, 1987).
    2) TETRACYCLINE: Has been found to have an anticollagenolytic effect. Systemic tetracycline 50 mg/kg/day reduced the incidence of alkali-induced corneal ulcerations in rabbits (Seedor et al, 1987).
    3) DOXYCYCLINE: Decreased epithelial defects and collagenase activity in a rabbit model of alkali burns to the eye (Perry et al, 1993). DOSE: 100 mg twice daily (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    i) ANTIBIOTICS
    1) An antibiotic ophthalmic ointment or drops should be used for as long as epithelial defects persist (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Topical erythromycin or tetracycline ointment may be used (Spector & Fernandez, 2008). In patients with severe burns, a topical fluoroquinolone antibiotic drop 4 times daily may also be used (Tuft & Shortt, 2009). A topical fourth generation fluoroquinolone has been recommended as an antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with large epithelial defect (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    j) TOPICAL CYCLOPLEGIC
    1) Cyclopentolate 0.5% or 1% eye drops may be administered 4 times daily to control pain (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    k) SOFT CONTACT LENSES
    1) A bandage contact lens (eg, silicone hydrogel) may make the patient more comfortable and protect the surface (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009). Hydrophilic high oxygen permeability lenses are preferred (Singh et al, 2013). Soft lenses with intermediate water content and inherent rigidity may facilitate reepithelialization. The use of 0.5 normal sodium chloride drops hourly and artificial tears or lubricant eyedrops instilled 4 times a day may help maintain adequate hydration and lens mobility.
    5) SURGICAL THERAPY
    a) SURGICAL THERAPY CAUSTIC EYE INJURY
    1) Early insertion of methylmethacrylate ring or suturing saran wrap over palpebral and cul-de-sac conjunctiva may prevent fibrinosis adhesions and reduce fibrotic contracture of conjunctiva, but the advantage of such treatments is not clear.
    2) Limbal stem cell transplantation has been used successfully in both the acute stage of injury and the chronically scarred healing phase in patients with persistent epithelial defects after chemical burns (Azuara-Blanco et al, 1999; Morgan & Murray, 1996; Ronk et al, 1994).
    3) In some patients, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) has been successful in improving corneal healing and visual acuity in patients with persistent epithelial defects after chemical burns. It can restore the conjunctival surface and decrease limbal stromal inflammation (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Sridhar et al, 2000; Su & Lin, 2000; Meller et al, 2000; Azuara-Blanco et al, 1999).
    4) Control glaucoma. Remove any cataracts formed (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    5) In patients with severe injury, tenonplasty can be performed to promote epithelialization and prevent melting (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    6) A keratoprosthesis placement has also been indicated in severe cases (Fish & Davidson, 2010). Penetrating keratoplasty is usually delayed as long as possible as results appear to be better with a greater lag time between injury and keratoplasty (Grant & Schuman, 1993a).
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and irrigate exposed areas with copious amounts of water. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) BURN INJURY
    1) Treat burns prophylactically for infection.
    2) Once irrigation is completed standard burn therapy should be instituted including tetanus prophylaxis, dressings and careful follow up to observe for complications and infection.
    3) GRAFTS - Skin grafts are often required for severe burns (Sawada & Doi, 1984; Husain et al, 1989)(Mozigo et al, 1988; Domonic et al, 1987).
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) HEMODIALYSIS is indicated in patients with renal failure.
    B) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal has been attempted to treat high blood levels of oxalate. Approximately 150 mg of oxalate can be removed before the charcoal becomes saturated after 2 hours of treatment (Haddad & Winchester, 1990). Studies to demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment in the clinical setting are lacking.

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) A 53-year-old man with a history of diabetes, smoking, and alcohol consumption was admitted to the hospital suffering from vomiting, diarrhea, and impaired consciousness after eating a soup containing 500 g sorrel (6 to 8 g oxalic acid). He exhibited hypocalcemia, metabolic acidosis, ventricular fibrillation, and death within 2 hours of admission. Autopsy findings included calcium oxalate crystals in the kidneys and blood vessels, and hepatic centrilobular necrosis (Farre et al, 1989).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Oral exposure to oxalic acid can be lethal at doses in the range of 15 to 30 grams. In fatal cases, death usually occurs within several hours. As little as 5 grams has been lethal by ingestion. Death within 5 minutes of IV administration of 1.2 grams of sodium oxalate has been reported. A woman developed acute renal failure and severe metabolic acidosis after ingesting about 12.5 g of 70% oxalic acid mixed in a glass of water. She recovered following supportive care, including hemodialysis.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL exposure to oxalic acid can be lethal at doses in the range of 15 to 30 grams. Death usually occurs within several hours (ACGIH, 1991).
    2) ORAL: As little as 5 grams has been lethal by ingestion (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    3) INTRAVENOUS: Death within 5 minutes of IV administration of 1.2 grams of sodium oxalate has been reported (Dvorackova, 1966).
    4) ORAL: LDLo - (ORAL) HUMAN, Female: 600 mg/kg (RTECS , 2001)
    B) ANIMAL DATA
    1) ANIMALS - Ingestion of two doses of 454 grams of oxalic acid within 24 hours was lethal to horses (HSDB , 1997).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE SERIES
    1) In Sri Lanka, intentional ingestion of a laundry detergent containing one sachet each of 12.5 g oxalic acid and 1.2 g potassium permanganate resulted in 115 cases of toxicity with 18 fatalities. Gastrointestinal symptoms developed within 24 hours of ingestion. Of the individuals that ingested oxalic acid only, a case fatality ratio of 25.4% was observed, while a case fatality ratio of 9.8% occurred in patients ingesting both oxalic acid and potassium permanganate. Of the 35 patients who ingested 2 or mor sachets of both potassium permanganate and oxalic acid, 16 died (46%). Of the 58 patients who ingested one sachet or less, 2 died (3%). Most deaths occurred within one hour of ingestion. Postmortem exam revealed macroscopic evidence of superficial erosions of the esophagus, oropharynx and larynx in all cases. Individuals ingesting a sublethal dose of oxalic acid and potassium permanganate (n=51) developed acute renal failure 2 to 3 days after exposure. Median serum creatinine was 1.7 (Interquartile range: 0.91-4.4). Most recovered with supportive care (Gawarammana et al, 2009).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) Intentional ingestion of 150 grams of sodium oxalate and 24 milligrams of flunitrazepam resulted in acute renal failure in a 47-year-old male. The patient recovered following 4 hemodialysis sessions, intravenous calcium gluconate and intensive intravenous crystalloid therapy (Hamilton et al, 1999).
    2) A 32-year-old woman developed acute renal failure and severe metabolic acidosis after ingesting about 12.5 g of 70% oxalic acid mixed in a glass of water. She recovered following supportive care, including hemodialysis (Dassanayake & Gnanathasan, 2012).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CASE REPORTS
    a) 2.4 milligrams/liter is considered to be the upper limit of normal serum oxalate level. In 4 females who ingested an unknown amount of potassium hydrogen oxalate, the one survivor had a serum level of 3.7 milligrams/liter whereas the levels in the 3 fatalities ranged from 18 to 110 milligrams/liter (Houts et al, 1985).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS144-62-7 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Oxalic acid
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 1 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL: 2 mg/m(3)
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions: Not Listed
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): URT, eye, and skin irr
    d) Molecular Weight: 90.04
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS144-62-7 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Oxalic acid
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 1 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL: 2 mg/m(3)
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s):
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 500 mg/m3
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS144-62-7 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Oxalic acid
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Oxalic acid
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS144-62-7 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Oxalic acid
    2) Table Z-1 for Oxalic acid:
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 1
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: RTECS, 2001 Budavari, 1996 Hathaway, 1996; Lewis, 1996 Clayton & Clayton, 1994 Unless otherwise noted, all data are included in RTECS.
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 270 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 7500 mg/kg
    b) 9.5 mL/kg -- 5% solution (Budavari, 1996)
    c) Male, 9.5 mL/kg -- 5% solution (Hathaway, 1996)
    d) Male, 475 mg/kg -- 5% aqueous solution (Clayton & Clayton, 1994)
    e) Female, 7.5 mL/kg -- 5% solution (Hathaway, 1996)
    f) Female, 375 mg/kg -- 5% aqueous solution (Clayton & Clayton, 1994)

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) There is no known pharmacological use for oxalic acid or oxalates.

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) OXALIC ACID - Toxic effects are due to complexing of oxalate with calcium, causing hypocalcemia and renal failure secondary to deposition of complexes in the renal tubules and vasculature.
    1) Ingestions result in local corrosive effects, with chemical burns of the mucous membranes and eventual ulceration of the oral and pharyngeal cavities. Exposed mucous membranes become white (Hamilton et al, 1999).
    B) ETHYLENE GLYCOL - 0.25% to 3.7% of ingested ethylene glycol is oxidized to oxalic acid in the body (Beasley et al, 1989). Even though oxalic acid is a minor metabolite, those species who divert more of ingested ethylene glycol into oxalate are most susceptible to severe signs of ethylene glycol poisoning (Woolf, 1993; Baselt, 2000).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Oxalic acid exists as a colorless or white, odorless, crystalline solid (Hathaway, 1996; (Lewis, 1996; Ashford, 1994). In solution it is a colorless liquid (Sittig, 1991).

Ph

    A) 1.3 (0.1M solution) (Budavari, 1996)

Molecular Weight

    A) 90.04

Clinical Effects

    11.1.9) OVINE/SHEEP
    A) Pregnant ewes fed 6 or 12 grams oxalic acid per day did not abort; however, the oxalate crossed the placental barrier as evidenced by the deposition of oxalate crystals in the kidneys of lambs (Clayton & Clayton, 1982).
    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) Large animals are most commonly exposed to oxalic acid via plant ingestion. Signs include lethargy and anorexia, renal failure, and death.
    2) Oxalate may cause decreased lactation and bone growth due to its calcium-binding effect (HSDB , 1991).
    3) Oxalic acid generally causes gastrointestinal irritation, oxalate crystalluria, oxalate nephrosis, and acute hypocalcemia and death. Poisonings with these products, used as rust removers, are rare (Beasley et al, 1989).
    4) Dogs and cats are more commonly poisoned by ethylene glycol, some of which is metabolized to oxalate in the body. Signs of ethylene glycol toxicity include anorexia and lethargy, hind limb ataxia, loss of reflexes, hypothermia, vomiting, coma, and death (Beasley et al, 1989).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    B) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    1) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    2) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    3) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    C) In the case of ethylene glycol poisoning, refer to the ETHYLENE GLYCOL management (MG270 - 272) for more detailed information.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) These recommendations may be used in the unlikely event of a primary exposure to oxalic acid.
    b) EMESIS - Is not recommended, unless undertaken within minutes of ingestion, due to propensity for the agent to cause gastrointestinal burns and loss of consciousness.
    c) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL - Administer activated charcoal. Dose: 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and if necessary tracheal intubation.
    d) CATHARTIC - Administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram). If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    e) OCULAR - Rinse eyes with copious amounts of tepid water for 15 minutes. If irritation, pain or photophobia persist, see your veterinarian.
    f) INHALATION - Move patient to fresh air. Monitor patient for respiratory distress. Emergency airway support and supplemental oxygen with assisted ventilation may be needed. If a cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation or bronchitis.
    g) DERMAL - Wash exposed animals with soap and water. If possible, shave or clip long hair to facilitate thorough cleaning. All handlers should wear gloves and protect themselves from exposure.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS - as necessary.
    2) Keep animal overnight and re-evaluate the next day.
    3) FLUID THERAPY - If necessary, begin fluid therapy at maintenance doses (66 milliliters solution/kilogram body weight/day intravenously) or, in hypotensive patients, at high doses (up to shock dose 60 milliliters/kilogram/hour). Monitor for urine production and pulmonary edema.
    4) BICARBONATE - Add sodium bicarbonate to the intravenous fluids if metabolic acidosis is suspected. (If using lactated ringers solution and precipitate forms upon addition of bicarbonate, discard and substitute a different solution). Formula for bicarbonate addition when blood gases are available: milliequivalents bicarb added = base deficit x 0.5 x body weight in kilograms. Give one half of the determined dose slowly over 3 to 4 hours intravenously. Continue to dose based on blood gas determinations. When blood gases are not available, administer 4 to 6 milliequivalents/kilogram intravenously slowly every 4 to 6 hours (Beasley et al, 1989).
    5) CALCIUM - If the animal has a low blood IONIZED calcium or severe hypocalcemia occurs, calcium may be given carefully. Calcium gluconate 10% solution: 0.5 to 1.5 milliliters/kilogram intravenously over at least 15 minutes. Calcium chloride 10% solution: 1.5 to 3.5 milliliters intravenously over at least 15 minutes. Calcium glycerophosphate/calcium lactate: 10 to 30 milliliters intravenously slowly or intramuscularly or subcutaneously.
    6) PRESSOR AGENTS - Dopamine 2 to 3 micrograms/kilogram/minute intravenously may be used to increase glomerular filtration rate (Beasley et al, 1989).
    7) DIURETICS - Furosemide may be administered at 2.2 milligrams/kilogram intravenously every 8 hours to assist in treatment of anuria and pulmonary edema (Beasley et al, 1989).

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) CAT
    1) Fatal amount of antifreeze, undiluted: 1.5 mg/kg. If diluted 50/50 with water, a 5 kg cat may die from drinking about 15 ml (Beasley et al, 1989). Toxic dose of oxalic acid is about 0.2 grams (HSDB , 1991).
    B) DOG
    1) Fatal dose of undiluted antifreeze: 6.6 ml/kg. If diluted 50/50 with water, a 10 kg dog would have to drink 132 ml or 4 1/2 oz (Beasley et al, 1989). Toxic dose of oxalic acid is about 1 gram (HSDB , 1991).
    C) SHEEP
    1) Fasting sheep are fatally poisoned by 340 grams of halogeton or 900 grams of greasewood (HSDB , 1991).
    D) HORSE
    1) Non-fatal toxicity has been induced by feeding 200 grams of oxalic acid per day for 8 days. Minimum fatal dose: 2 doses of 454 grams oxalic acid given within 24 hours (HSDB , 1991).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    B) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    1) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    2) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    3) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    C) In the case of ethylene glycol poisoning, refer to the ETHYLENE GLYCOL management (MG270 - 272) for more detailed information.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) These recommendations may be used in the unlikely event of a primary exposure to oxalic acid.
    b) EMESIS - Is not recommended, unless undertaken within minutes of ingestion, due to propensity for the agent to cause gastrointestinal burns and loss of consciousness.
    c) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL - Administer activated charcoal. Dose: 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and if necessary tracheal intubation.
    d) CATHARTIC - Administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram). If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    e) OCULAR - Rinse eyes with copious amounts of tepid water for 15 minutes. If irritation, pain or photophobia persist, see your veterinarian.
    f) INHALATION - Move patient to fresh air. Monitor patient for respiratory distress. Emergency airway support and supplemental oxygen with assisted ventilation may be needed. If a cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation or bronchitis.
    g) DERMAL - Wash exposed animals with soap and water. If possible, shave or clip long hair to facilitate thorough cleaning. All handlers should wear gloves and protect themselves from exposure.
    11.4.3) TREATMENT
    11.4.3.5) SUPPORTIVE CARE
    A) GENERAL
    1) Ongoing treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    11.4.3.6) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) GENERAL
    a) LABORATORY PREMORTEM - Monitor blood pH, calcium, BUN, creatinine, glucose, phosphorus, chloride, bicarbonate, and potassium. Monitor urinary output, specific gravity, and check sediment for casts and calcium oxalate and hippuric acid crystals.
    b) LABORATORY POSTMORTEM - Necropsy findings include: accumulation of calcium oxalate crystals in the kidneys and urinary tract; hemorrhagic and congested lungs (HSDB , 1991).

Pharmacology Toxicology

    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) OXALIC ACID - Toxic effects are due to complexing of oxalate with calcium, causing hypocalcemia and renal failure secondary to deposition of complexes in the renal tubules and vasculature.
    2) ETHYLENE GLYCOL - 0.25 to 3.7% of ingested ethylene glycol is oxidized to oxalic acid in the body (Beasley et al, 1989). Even though oxalic acid is a minor metabolite, those species who divert more of ingested ethylene glycol into oxalate are most susceptible to severe signs of ethylene glycol poisoning (Baselt & Cravey, 1989).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    15) Aceto T Jr, Terplan K, & Fiore RR: Chemical burns of the esophagus in children and glucocorticoid therapy. J Med 1970; 1:101-109.
    16) Adam JS & Brick HG: Pediatric caustic ingestion. Ann Otol Laryngol 1982; 91:656-658.
    17) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    18) Anderson KD, Touse TM, & Randolph JG: A controlled trial of corticosteroids in children with corrosive injury of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:637-640.
    19) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    20) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 1994.
    21) Azuara-Blanco A, Pillai CT, & Dua HS: Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83:399-402.
    22) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    23) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    24) Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A Systems Affected Approach to Veterinary Toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1989.
    25) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    26) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    27) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    28) Boukthir S, Fetni I, Mrad SM, et al: [High doses of steroids in the management of caustic esophageal burns in children]. Arch Pediatr 2004; 11(1):13-17.
    29) Brodovsky SC, McCarty AC, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year retrospective review. Ophthalmology 2000a; 107:1829-1835.
    30) Brodovsky SC, McCarty CA, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year retrospective review. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:1829-1835.
    31) Brodovsky SC, McCarty CA, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year review. Ophthalmology 2000b; 107:1829-1835.
    32) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    33) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    34) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    35) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    36) Caravati EM: Alkali. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    37) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    38) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    39) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    40) Chodak GW & Passaro E: Acid ingestion: need for gastric resection. JAMA 1978; 239:229-226.
    41) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    42) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2C, Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1982.
    43) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2E, Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    44) Cleveland WW, Chandler JR, & Lawson RB: Treatment of caustic burns of the esophagus. JAMA 1963; 186:182-183.
    45) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    46) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    47) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    48) Dassanayake U & Gnanathasan CA: Acute renal failure following oxalic acid poisoning: a case report. J Occup Med Toxicol 2012; 7(1):17-.
    49) Dilawari JB, Singh S, & Rao PN: Corrosive acid ingestion in man, a clinical and endoscopic study. Gut 1984; 25:183-187.
    50) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    51) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    52) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    53) Dvorackova I: Todliche vergiftumh nach intravenoser verabreichung von natriumoxalat (German). Arch Toxikol 1966; 22:63-67.
    54) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    55) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    56) Ernst AA, Thomson T, & Haynes ML: Warmed versus room temperature saline solution for ocular irrigation: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32:676-679.
    57) Estrera A, Taylor W, & Mills LJ: Corrosive burns of the esophagus and stomach: a recommendation of an aggressive surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:276-283.
    58) Farre M, Xirgu J, & Salgado A: Fatal oxalic acid poisoning from sorrel soup. Lancet 1989; 2:1524.
    59) Ferguson MK, Migliore M, & Staszak VM: Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury. Am J Surg 1989; 157:116-120.
    60) Fish R & Davidson RS: Management of ocular thermal and chemical injuries, including amniotic membrane therapy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21(4):317-321.
    61) Gawarammana IB, Ariyananda PL, Palangasinghe C, et al: Emerging epidemic of fatal human self-poisoning with a washing powder in Southern Sri Lanka: a prospective observational study. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009; 47(5):407-411.
    62) Goldman M & Doering GJ: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 48:409-414.
    63) Goldman M: Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1977; 18:369-372.
    64) Gorman RL, Khin-Maung-Gyi MT, & Klein-Schwartz W: Initial symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury in alkaline corrosive ingestions. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:89-94.
    65) Gosselin RE, Smith RP, & Hodge HC: Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th Edition, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1984.
    66) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    67) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993a.
    68) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993b.
    69) Grolnick M: Case of early gangrene due to oxalic acid immersion. J Medicine 1929; 29:1461.
    70) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    71) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    72) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    73) Haddad LM & Winchester JF: Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdose, 2nd ed, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.
    74) Haller JA & Bachman K: The comparative effect of current therapy on experimental caustic burns of the esophagus. Pediatrics 1964; 236-245.
    75) Haller JA, Andrews HG, & White JJ: Pathophysiology and management of acute corrosive burns of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 1971; 6:578-584.
    76) Hamilton SE, Pielage PJ, & Fassett RG: Acute renal failure following sodium oxalate ingestion. Emerg Med 1999; 11:35-37.
    77) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 3rd ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1991, pp 449-450.
    78) Hawkins DB, Demeter MJ, & Barnett TE: Caustic ingestion: controversies in management. A review of 214 cases. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:98-109.
    79) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    80) Houts M, Baselt RC, & Cravey RH: Court Room Toxicology. Oxalate Monograph, Matthew Bender, New York, NY, 1985.
    81) Hovarth OP, Olah T, & Zentai G: Emergency esophagogastrectomy for the treatment of hydrochloric acid injury. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52:98-101.
    82) Howell JM, Dalsey WC, & Hartsell FW: Steroids for the treatment of corrosive esophageal injury: a statistical analysis of past studies. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:421-425.
    83) Howell JM: Alkaline ingestions. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 15:820-825.
    84) Husain MT, Hasanain J, & Kumar P: Sulphuric acid burns: report of a mass domestic accident. Burns 1989; 15:389-391.
    85) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    86) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    87) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    88) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    89) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    90) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    91) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    92) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    93) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    94) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed. Vols 1-2, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
    95) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    96) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    97) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    98) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    99) Khaskhali MH, Bhanger MI, & Khand FD: Simultaneous determination of oxalic and citric acids in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 1996; 675:147-151.
    100) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    101) Knox WG, Scott JR, & Zintel HA: Bouginage and steroids used singly or in combination in experimental corrosive esophagitis. Ann Surg 1967; 166:930-941.
    102) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    103) Laerum E & Aarseth S: Urolithiasis in railroad shopmen in relation to oxalic acid exposure at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985; 11:97-100.
    104) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1993.
    105) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 8th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1992.
    106) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    107) LoVecchio F, Hamilton R, & Sturman K: A meta-analysis of the use of steroids in the prevention of stricture formation from second degree caustic burns of the esophagus (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1996; 35:579-580.
    108) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    109) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    110) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    111) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    112) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    113) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    114) Marshall F II: Caustic burns of the esophagus: ten year results of aggressive care. South Med J 1979; 72:1236-1237.
    115) Meller D, Pires RT, & Mack RJS: Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute chemical or thermal burns. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:980-990.
    116) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    117) Menon M & Mahle CJ: Oxalate metabolism and renal calculi. J Urol 1982; 127:148-151.
    118) Meredith JW, Kon ND, & Thompson JN: Management of injuries from liquid lye ingestion. J Trauma 1988; 28:1173-1180.
    119) Moazam F, Talbert JL, & Miller D: Caustic ingestion and its sequelae in children. South Med J 1987; 80:187-188.
    120) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    121) Morgan S & Murray A: Limbal autotransplantation in the acute and chronic phases of severe chemical injuries. Eye 1996; 10:349-354.
    122) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 11th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994.
    123) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    124) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    125) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    126) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    127) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    128) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    129) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    130) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    131) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    132) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    133) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    134) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    135) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    136) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    137) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    138) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    139) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    140) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    141) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    142) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    143) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    144) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    145) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    146) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    147) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    148) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    206) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    207) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    208) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    209) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    210) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    211) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    212) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    213) Nuutinen M, Uhari M, & Karvali T: Consequences of caustic ingestions in children. Acta Paediatr 1994; 83:1200-1205.
    214) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    215) Oakes DD, Sherck JP, & Mark JBD: Lye ingestion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83:194-204.
    216) Ono K: Secondary hyperoxalemia caused by vitamin C supplementation in regular hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 1986; 26:239-243.
    217) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    218) Pelclova D & Navratil T: Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion?. Toxicol Rev 2005; 24(2):125-129.
    219) Perry HD, Hodes LW, & Seedor JA: Effect of doxycycline hyclate on corneal epithelial wound healing in the rabbit alkali-burn model. Preliminary observations. Cornea 1993; 12:379-82.
    220) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    221) Previtera C, Giusti F, & Gugliemi M: Predictive value of visible lesions (cheeks, lips, oropharynx) in suspected caustic ingestion: may endoscopy reasonably be omitted in completely negative pediatric patients?. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6:176-178.
    222) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    223) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    224) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1997; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    225) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    226) Reyes HM, Lin CY, & Schluhk FF: Experimental treatment of corrosive esophageal burns. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9:317-327.
    227) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    228) Ronk JF, Ruiz-Esmenjaud S, & Osorio M: Limbal conjunctival autograft in subacute alkaline corneal burn. Cornea 1994; 13:465-468.
    229) Rosenberg N, Kunderman PJ, & Vroman L: Prevention of experimental esophageal stricture by cortisone II. Arch Surg 1953; 66:593-598.
    230) Saedi S, Nyhus LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973a; 39:465-469.
    231) Saedi S, Nyhust LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973; 39:465-469.
    232) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    233) Sawada Y & Doi K: Chemical burn from sulphuric acid: a case report. Burns 1984; 10:300-302.
    234) Saydjari R, Abston S, & Desai MH: Chemical burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1986; 7:404-408.
    235) Schiefer B: Zentralbl Veterinaermed, Reihe A 1976; 23:226-233.
    236) Schild JA: Caustic ingestion in adult patients. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:1199-1201.
    237) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    238) Seedor JA, Perry HD, & McNamara TF: Systemic tetracycline treatment of alkali-induced corneal ulceration in rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105:268-271.
    239) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    240) Sharma S, Nath R, & Thind SK: Recent advances in measurement of oxalate in biological materials. Scanning Microsc 1993; 7:431-441.
    241) Sheikh-Omar AR & Schiefer HB: Pertanika 1980; 3:25-31.
    242) Singh P, Tyagi M, Kumar Y, et al: Ocular chemical injuries and their management. Oman J Ophthalmol 2013; 6(2):83-86.
    243) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    244) Spector J & Fernandez WG: Chemical, thermal, and biological ocular exposures. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2008; 26(1):125-136.
    245) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    246) Sridhar MS, Bansal AK, & Sangwan VS: Amniotic membrans transplantation in acute chemical and thermal injury. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130:134-137.
    247) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    248) Su CY & Lin CP: Combined use of an amniotic membrane and tissue adhesive in treating corneal perforation: a case report. Ophtalmic Sufr Lasers 2000; 31:151-154.
    249) Sugawa C & Lucas CE: Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: a clinical and endoscopic study. Surgery 1989; 106:802-807.
    250) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    251) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    252) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    253) Tuft SJ & Shortt AJ: Surgical rehabilitation following severe ocular burns. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23(10):1966-1971.
    254) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    255) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    256) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    257) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    258) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    259) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    260) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    261) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    262) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    263) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    264) Urben PG: Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, Volumes 1, 5th ed, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, England, 1995.
    265) Vergauwen P, Moulin D, & Buts JP: Caustic burns of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150:700-703.
    266) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    267) Woolf A: Oxalates (review). Clin Toxicol Rev 1993; 16(6):1-2.
    268) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    269) Wu MH & Lai WW: Surgical management of extensive corrosive injuries of the alimentary tract. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 1993; 177:12-16.
    270) Yamamoto R, Morita S, Aoki H, et al: Acute renal failure and metabolic acidosis due to oxalic acid intoxication: a case report. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2011; 36(4):116-119.
    271) Yarington CT & Heatly CA: Steroids, antibiotics, and early esophagoscopy in caustic esophageal trauma. N Y State J Med 1963; 63:2960-2963.
    272) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Mehta S: The role of fiberoptic endoscopy in the management of corrosive ingestion and modified endoscopic classification of burns. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:165-169.
    273) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Nagi B: Ingestion of corrosive acids: spectrum of injury to upper gastrointestinal tract and natural history. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:702-707.