MOBILE VIEW  | 

AMLODIPINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Amlodipine, a peripheral arterial vasodilator, is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist.

Specific Substances

    1) Amlodipin
    2) Amlodipinum
    3) Amlodipine besylate
    4) CAS 88150-42-9

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Available in 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets that contain amlodipine besylate equivalent to amlodipine (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) ORALLY DISINTEGRATING: Available in 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets that contain amlodipine besylate equivalent to amlodipine (Prod Info amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, 2007).
    B) USES
    1) Amlodipine is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, the symptomatic treatment of chronic, stable angina or vasospastic angina and documented coronary artery disease by angiography (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).(Prod Info amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, 2007).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Amlodipine is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, the symptomatic treatment of chronic, stable angina or vasospastic angina and documented coronary artery disease by angiography.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Amlodipine, a peripheral arterial vasodilator, is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances. It selectively inhibits calcium ion influx into cardiac and vascular smooth muscle cells through L-gated calcium channels. As a dihydropyridine it has a greater effect on vascular smooth muscle cell compared to cardiac muscle cells. However, this selectively may be lost following a significant overdose.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses may cause peripheral vasodilation with significant hypotension.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose has occurred, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, there is less experience with amlodipine exposure compared to other calcium channel blockers.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: COMMON: Edema, dizziness, flushing and palpitations are the most common adverse effects reported with amlodipine therapy.
    2) OTHER EFFECTS: Fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain and somnolence can occur.
    3) INFREQUENT: Dysrhythmias (includes atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia), bradycardia or tachycardia, chest pain, peripheral ischemia and syncope have been reported in less than 1% of patients being treated with amlodipine.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Reflex tachycardia and hypotension are early findings of exposure. Hypotension may not develop for several hours after exposure but events may be precipitous. Drowsiness, nausea and vomiting may also develop. Peripheral vasodilation is anticipated following amlodipine (ie, dihydropyridine effect) toxicity.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can cause profound hypotension that may be refractory to various inotrope therapies. Conduction disturbances may develop but significant dysrhythmias do not appear typical of amlodipine toxicity. Shock, metabolic acidosis, acute renal failure, respiratory failure and/or hypoxemia can develop following severe toxicity.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Amlodipine has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. It is unknown if amlodipine is excreted in breast milk. In animal studies, there was no evidence of teratogenicity or other embryo-fetal toxicity.
    B) The combination product amlodipine/perindopril arginine has been classified as FDA pregnancy category D.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Serum amlodipine concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    B) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    D) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    E) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    F) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    G) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion (calcium chloride is preferred) may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Because an amlodipine overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated who have ingested a very large dose of amlodipine. There is a report of an adult treated with whole-bowel irrigation following an amlodipine ingestion of 1000 mg. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Intubate patients with coma, mental status depression or significant hemodynamic instability.
    E) HYPOTENSION
    1) Treat initially with fluids (insert a central venous or pulmonary artery catheter to guide fluid therapy if hypotension persists). Consider inserting an arterial line in patients with refractory hypotension. Intravenous calcium, vasopressors, high dose insulin/dextrose, intravenous lipid emulsion, and glucagon may all be useful for refractory hypotension. Pacemakers (external or internal), intraaortic balloon pump, and cardiopulmonary bypass have been used in patients exposed to amlodipine and other calcium antagonists that were refractory to other modalities.
    2) CALCIUM
    a) Intravenous calcium infusions have been shown to be helpful, although response is often short lived. Optimal dosing is not established; start with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion starting with 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) and titrate as needed. Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration. Patients with severe overdose have tolerated significant hypercalcemia (up to twice the upper limit of normal) without developing clinical or ECG evidence of hypercalcemia.
    3) INSULIN
    a) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to titrate insulin infusion. Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued. Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium less than 2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    4) VASOPRESSORS
    a) Anecdotal reports suggest that epinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, or phenylephrine may occasionally be effective in patients who do not respond to dopamine or norepinephrine.
    5) FAT EMULSION
    a) Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Administer 1.5 mL/kg of 20% lipid emulsion over 2 to 3 minutes as an IV bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min. Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion. If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources. Where possible, lipid resuscitation therapy should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    6) GLUCAGON
    a) DOSE: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon.
    7) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    8) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) There are case reports where a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (inamrinone, enoximone) appeared to improve blood pressure in patients unresponsive to other modalities.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is likely not of value following an amlodipine exposure, because of the high degree of protein binding (93%).
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: According to the AAPCC guidelines, a healthy, asymptomatic adult with a single inadvertent ingestion of amlodipine 10 mg or less can be monitored at home. For children, ingestions of less than 0.3 mg/kg of amlodipine can be monitored at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a health care facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring. According to the AAPCC guidelines, patients with an inadvertent single ingestion of amlodipine doses greater than 10 mg should be referred to a healthcare facility. For children, ingestions of greater than 0.3 mg/kg of amlodipine should be referred to a healthcare facility. Patients should be observed for at least 6 hours after an amlodipine ingestion until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients who develop signs or symptoms of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Focus on antidote treatment should not be done in lieu of initially following standard ACLS protocols for treatment of hypotension. In severely poisoned patients, treatment should be aggressive, and the treatments and antidotes described above may need to be started simultaneously. Consider coingestants with other cardiopulmonary medications such as digoxin since these patients may be on multiple medications. Toxicity can be delayed and prolonged after overdose of modified release formulations.
    I) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist. Peak plasma concentrations occur between 6 and 12 hours. It appears to have a linear pharmacokinetic profile (ie, the dose ingested correlates with mean peak plasma concentration). Absolute bioavailability is estimated to be between 64% and 90%. In hypertensive patients, amlodipine is 93% bound to plasma proteins. Elimination is biphasic with a terminal elimination half-life of about 30 to 50 hours. It is extensively converted to inactive metabolites via hepatic metabolism. Ten percent of the parent compound and 60% of the metabolites are excreted in the urine.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Amlodipine is slowly absorbed. Symptoms may be delayed following exposure but are likely to develop within 6 to 12 hours. Toxicity may develop precipitously with a sudden drop in blood pressure several hours after exposure. Unlike other calcium channel blockers, amlodipine is not available in a sustained release formulation. However, the immediate release formulation has a prolonged terminal elimination half-life of about 30 to 50 hours with therapeutic use. Effects may be further prolonged following overdose and are likely dose-dependent.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Ingestion of other cardioactive drugs (especially beta-blockers and digoxin) should be considered in a patient who is bradycardic and hypotensive.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has not been established. Patients with the following inadvertent single substance ingestions are considered to have the potential to develop toxicity and should be referred to a healthcare facility: AMLODIPINE: ADULT: Greater than 10 mg; CHILD: Greater than 0.3 mg/kg. ADULT: A 63-year-old woman died after ingesting 70 mg amlodipine and an unknown quantity of oxazepam. The lowest reported fatal dose in an adult was 100 mg of amlodipine alone. ADOLESCENT: A 15-year-old previously healthy girl died after ingesting 140 mg of amlodipine and 10 mefenamic acid capsules. SURVIVAL: A woman survived a 1000 mg amlodipine (alone) ingestion.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: 2.5 to 10 mg once daily; maximum dose 10 mg daily. CHILD: AGES 6 TO 17 YEARS: 2.5 to 5 mg once daily for hypertension; doses higher than 5 mg daily have not been studied.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Amlodipine is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, the symptomatic treatment of chronic, stable angina or vasospastic angina and documented coronary artery disease by angiography.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Calcium channel blockers are divided into 2 major classes, dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines. Amlodipine, a peripheral arterial vasodilator, is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist. It has selectivity for both vascular and myocardium calcium channels that can produce hypotension, bradycardia and conduction disturbances. It selectively inhibits calcium ion influx into cardiac and vascular smooth muscle cells through L-gated calcium channels. As a dihydropyridine it has a greater effect on vascular smooth muscle cell compared to cardiac muscle cells. However, this selectively may be lost following a significant overdose.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses may cause peripheral vasodilation with significant hypotension.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose has occurred, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, there is less experience with amlodipine exposure compared to other calcium channel blockers.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: COMMON: Edema, dizziness, flushing and palpitations are the most common adverse effects reported with amlodipine therapy.
    2) OTHER EFFECTS: Fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain and somnolence can occur.
    3) INFREQUENT: Dysrhythmias (includes atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia), bradycardia or tachycardia, chest pain, peripheral ischemia and syncope have been reported in less than 1% of patients being treated with amlodipine.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Reflex tachycardia and hypotension are early findings of exposure. Hypotension may not develop for several hours after exposure but events may be precipitous. Drowsiness, nausea and vomiting may also develop. Peripheral vasodilation is anticipated following amlodipine (ie, dihydropyridine effect) toxicity.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can cause profound hypotension that may be refractory to various inotrope therapies. Conduction disturbances may develop but significant dysrhythmias do not appear typical of amlodipine toxicity. Shock, metabolic acidosis, acute renal failure, respiratory failure and/or hypoxemia can develop following severe toxicity.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Symptomatic hypotension may occur with amlodipine therapy. Patients with a history of severe aortic stenosis may be at greater risk to develop hypotension. Acute hypotension is unlikely to occur (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SIGNS/SYMPTOMS: Marked hypotension is common following significant overdose with amlodipine. Peripheral vasodilation can occur in overdose (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013). Hypotension may be severe and refractory to various pressor agents and other therapies. Syncopal episodes secondary to impaired perfusion may occur (Meaney et al, 2013; Devasahayam et al, 2012; Smith et al, 2008; Wood et al, 2005; Saravu & Balasubramanian, 2004).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman developed hypotension, oliguria, and respiratory failure after ingesting 27 tablets of 5 mg amlodipine. She was treated with intravenous lipid emulsion. Based on a written lipid emulsion therapy protocol, a maximum of 387.5 mL of intralipid for a 50 kg patient was ordered and treatment was started 12.5 hours after presentation. However, she inadvertently received a total of 2000 mL of 20% intralipid which ran for 4.5 hours (greater than 5 times the maximum suggested dose). There were no obvious clinical effects from the intravenous lipid overdose aside from lipemic serum. Because of severe lipemia, no metabolic panel and CBC analysis could be obtained. On hospital day 2, the treatment team felt that recovery from the amlodipine overdose was unlikely. After her family decided to withdraw care, she died within the next 24 hours (West et al, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old woman intentionally ingested a witnessed "handful" of amlodipine (10 mg) and valsartan (80 mg) tablets and presented to the ED within 45 minutes and required multiple therapies for refractory hypotension. Initially, vital signs were within normal limits; tachycardia (120 beats/min) was well tolerated. Activated charcoal was given. Hypotension (80/45 mm Hg) and a slight decrease in heart rate (94 beats/min) occurred 2 hours after ingestion. Persistent hypotension occurred despite multiple therapies including 30 mL of 10% calcium gluconate, IV fluids (ie, normal saline (5 L) and colloids (500 mL)) and concomitant vasopressors (ie, epinephrine, norepinephrine, phenylephrine and vasopressin). Approximately, 6.5 hours after exposure, high-dose insulin-euglycemia (HIE) therapy (1 unit insulin/kg bolus followed by an infusion rate of 2.64 units/kg/hr) and concurrent dextrose, glucagon and naloxone were initiated for ongoing hypotension (BP 81/41 mm Hg). Acidosis also developed. By day 4, the patient was intubated for poor respiratory response to acidosis, respiratory insufficiency and to decrease cardiac work load. HIE therapy was infused for 41 hours (total dose 3573 units of insulin) with cardiac improvement. However, the patient's clinical course was further complicated by thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, bilateral soleal deep venous thromboses, and mild gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The patient was discharged on day 37 with no permanent sequelae (Smith et al, 2008).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman, with a history of alcohol abuse, intentionally ingested 70 tablets of amlodipine 5 mg and an unknown amount of ethanol and was admitted to the ED within one hour of exposure. Her initial heart rate was 113 beats/min and blood pressure was 103/57 mm Hg with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 72 mm Hg. An ECG showed accelerated junctional rhythm with a QTc interval of 429 ms and QRS interval of 92 ms. She was initially given 75 g of activated charcoal and 3 L of normal saline (NS). Within 2 hours of admission, her blood pressure continued to decline (89/57 mm Hg) and calcium gluconate (2 g bolus) and a 20% intralipid (100 mL) bolus were given with temporary improvement. The patient was transferred to the ICU. About 5 hours after exposure, she developed shock (MAP 38 to 52 mm Hg) and became hemodynamically unstable. Vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, and phenylephrine) were immediately added and another 6 L of NS were given. In addition, calcium chloride 40 mg/kg/hr, glucagon 10 mg/hr and an insulin infusion at 5 units/hr (titrated to 15 units/hr) were started. An echocardiogram showed that systemic vascular resistance was severely reduced along with a hyperdynamic left ventricle. Metabolic acidosis occurred approximately 8 hours after exposure and sodium bicarbonate was added. A 20% lipid infusion (started at 100 mL/hr then rapidly increased to 500 mL/hr) was administered for ongoing hypotension; a total of 2300 mL (20.9 mL/kg infusion total) was infused over 4.5 hours. Vasopressor therapies were weaned within 12 hours of starting the lipid infusion; glucagon and calcium were also discontinued a short time later. Throughout the remainder of her hospital course, her blood pressure remained stable and she was transferred to a clinical floor on day 4 and discharged to home on day 8 (Meaney et al, 2013).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman intentionally ingested a handful of her amlodipine and losartan approximately 3 hours prior to arrival. Based on the empty packets brought to the hospital, the estimated doses were 770 mg of amlodipine and 16640 mg of losartan. She was initially stable but developed a spontaneous drop in blood pressure (70/40 mm Hg) shortly after admission. Despite 5 L of fluids, hypotension (systolic blood pressure 75 mm Hg with a mean arterial pressure of 45 to 50 mm Hg) persisted. Additional therapies included, noradrenaline (0.1 mcg/kg/min), metaraminol (0.5 mg bolus only) and 10% calcium gluconate (20 mL). Noninvasive ventilation was also started for hypoxia and radiologic evidence of pulmonary edema. Following contact with a poison center, vasopressin, glucagon and hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia (HIE) therapies were initiated. HIE was started 14 hours after admission at a rate of 6 Units/kg/hr over the next 12 hours with no sustained clinical improvement in hypotension. This was followed by the initiation of 20% intralipid therapy (initial 150 mL bolus) at an infusion rate of 3 mL/kg/hr (total dose 650 mL). Severe metabolic acidosis was treated with sodium bicarbonate. Eighteen hours after presentation, hypotension was refractory to multiple therapies and the patient was anuric with acute renal injury. A metaraminol infusion was begun approximately 47 hours after admission with an immediate sustained improvement in blood pressure and a significant increase in urine output. Other inotropes were gradually weaned and the patient clinically improved. She was discharged about a week after hospitalization with no permanent sequelae (Plumb et al, 2011).
    f) CASE REPORT: Cardiovascular collapse was reported following an amlodipine overdose ingestion of 100 mg. Although hemodynamically stabilized following overdose, the patient died 112 days after admission due to sepsis and multiorgan failure (Adams & Browne, 1998).
    B) TACHYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Reflex tachycardia secondary to a decrease in perfusion has been reported in overdose (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013; Saravu & Balasubramanian, 2004; Stanek et al, 1997; Cosbey & Carson, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) CASE REPORT (TODDLER): Tachycardia to 180 beats/min following 2 mg/kg oral overdose of amlodipine occurred in a 19-month-old (Prod Info Norvasc(R), amlodipine besylate, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT (CHILD): An 11-month-old child presented to the emergency department tachycardic (133 beats/min), hypotensive (67/42 mmHg), tachypneic (40 beats/min), lethargic, and cyanotic approximately 90 minutes after a suspected ingestion of up to 9 capsules of a fixed combination product containing amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg. Shortly after hospital arrival, the patient became progressively bradycardic and developed asystole approximately 55 minutes post-arrival. Despite intensive resuscitative measures, the patient remained unresponsive and died approximately 2 hours post-arrival. Amlodipine ingestion was confirmed with a post mortem amlodipine heart blood concentration of 1,300 ng/mL(Spiller et al, 2012).
    C) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/PEDIATRIC: An 11-month-old child presented to the ED tachycardic (133 beats/min), hypotensive (67/42 mmHg), tachypneic (40 beats/min), lethargic, and cyanotic approximately 90 minutes after a suspected ingestion of up to 9 capsules of a fixed combination product containing amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg. Shortly after hospital arrival, the patient became progressively bradycardic and developed asystole approximately 55 minutes post-arrival. Despite intensive resuscitative measures, the patient remained unresponsive and died approximately 2 hours post-arrival. Amlodipine ingestion was confirmed with a post mortem amlodipine heart blood concentration of 1,300 ng/mL(Spiller et al, 2012).
    D) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Electrophysiologic effects including ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation have been reported in less than 1% of patients receiving amlodipine (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: In overdose, all agents can cause rhythm disturbances and conduction defects. Nifedipine, amlodipine, and other dihydropyridines lack the effects of other structural classes of calcium antagonists on AV nodal conduction. Therefore, these agents are more likely to result in reflex tachycardia secondary to diminished perfusion; bradycardia is twice as likely with verapamil and diltiazem. AV block, especially greater than first degree, is predominately a finding with verapamil.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old woman intentionally ingested 280 mg of amlodipine, 25 mg of clonazepam, 150 to 300 mg of citalopram, and 2.5 g of paracetamol and developed hypotension (systolic BP in the 60s), along with third-degree AV block, severe hyperkalemia (K+ 6.5 mEq/L) and acute renal failure. Approximately 15 to 20 minutes after receiving a 20 unit bolus of insulin to treat the hyperkalemia, the patient's BP increased to 95 to 100 mmHg, and the heart rhythm returned to normal sinus. The patient was further treated with venovenous hemodiafiltration, and made a gradual, complete recovery (Rasmussen et al, 2003).
    E) ANGINA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Symptoms of angina may worsen when initiating or increasing the dose of amlodipine. Patients with a history of severe obstructive coronary artery disease are at particular risk to develop symptoms (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    F) MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Acute myocardial infarction may occur when initiating or increasing the dose of amlodipine. Patients with a history of severe obstructive coronary artery disease are at particular risk to develop symptoms (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    G) PALPITATIONS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Palpitations was one of the most common adverse effects reported during amlodipine therapy of up to 10 mg daily (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema has been reported following amlodipine overdoses (Hasson et al, 2011; Spiller et al, 2012; Saravu & Balasubramanian, 2004).
    b) CASE REPORT: Acute noncardiogenic pulmonary edema occurred in a 22-year-old woman after intentionally ingesting 280 mg of amlodipine. Acute shortness of breath and evidence of congestive heart failure developed on hospital day 2. The patient was also hypoxic and was started on 8 L of oxygen via a non-rebreathing mask along with a furosemide infusion (80 mg over 6 hours; later increased to 120 mg over 6 hours). By day 3, large bilateral pleural effusions were confirmed by pulmonary diagnostic studies; heart size and function remained normal. Diuretic therapy was continued for several more days with gradual clinical improvement (Hasson et al, 2011).
    c) CASE REPORT/FATALITY: Necropsy showed pulmonary edema with foci of terminal aspiration in a 15-year-old girl following a 140 mg amlodipine overdose in conjunction with 10 mefenamic acid capsules (Cosbey & Carson, 1997).
    d) CASE REPORT: Mild, reversible pulmonary edema was reported in a 42-year-old woman after an overdose of 50 to 100 mg amlodipine and 40 ounces of beer (Stanek et al, 1997).
    B) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AMLODIPINE/CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with a history of depression and alcohol abuse intentionally ingested 500 mg of amlodipine, 1000 mg of lisinopril and 625 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. He was initially stable. A short time later, the patient deteriorated (blood pressure nadir of 50/34 mm Hg) and he became obtunded. Therapies included intubation, IV fluids, inotropic support (norepinephrine, dopamine), calcium and glucagon. Hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia with insulin was added. Despite various therapies, his central venous pressure was 22 mm Hg and he remained in shock. Additional therapies included phenylephrine, vasopressin and epinephrine; infusions were titrated to maximum rates with no clinical improvement. Respiratory failure secondary to severe hypoxemia, as well as laboratory evidence of hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia and renal failure also developed. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy was started because of the patient's ongoing shock and hypotension (range, 69/39 to 92/31 mm Hg). ECMO was continued for 8 days while various therapies were gradually weaned. By day 17, he was successfully extubated with no supplemental oxygen needed. His hospital course was further complicated by renal failure requiring temporary continuous venovenous hemodialysis, bacteremia, and the development of a pleural effusion. The patient was discharged to home on day 56 with no permanent sequelae (Weinberg et al, 2014).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FATIGUE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Fatigue was one of the most common adverse effects reported during amlodipine therapy of up to 10 mg daily (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dizziness was one of the most common adverse effects reported during amlodipine therapy of up to 10 mg daily (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) DROWSY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Somnolence may develop with amlodipine therapy (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FINDINGS: Drowsiness, mental confusion, lethargy, and lightheadedness are common (Spiller et al, 2012). Patients may become drowsy following acute exposure but can remain arousable and respond appropriately (Persad et al, 2012).
    D) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old woman began amlodipine therapy, and several weeks later, developed fatigue, headaches, myalgias, arthralgias, weakness, numbness and tingling of the extremities, a facial "lupuslike" rash, and left-side facial hemiparesis. The symptoms increased in severity with an increasing dosage of amlodipine, but resolved following cessation of amlodipine therapy (Phillips & Muller, 1998).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea has been reported with amlodipine therapy (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea and vomiting may occur in overdose (Harris, 2006; Persad et al, 2012; Spiller et al, 2012).
    B) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Abdominal pain may develop with therapeutic use (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    C) DRUG-INDUCED ILEUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain and vomiting after self-medicating with her husband's prescription of amlodipine, 10 mg orally twice daily for 10 days, after running out of her own nifedipine prescription. Vital signs indicated hypotension, tachycardia, and tachypnea, and a physical examination revealed abdominal distension with tenderness and guarding. An abdominal CT scan showed small bowel obstruction with fecal loading of the colon. The patient's clinical course was complicated with development of lactic acidosis, cardiogenic shock, and respiratory failure. With supportive care, the patient recovered with gradual resolution of the ileus (Devasahayam et al, 2012).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) CASE REPORT: Mild elevations in transaminase levels developed in 1 patient after prolonged hypotension following amlodipine overdose (Koch et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: Jaundice and elevated hepatic enzyme levels were reported in a 69-year-old man following amlodipine therapy, 5 mg twice daily for 10 months. The patient recovered within weeks, without sequelae, after discontinuation of amlodipine. Five months after beginning diltiazem therapy, 300 mg/day, the jaundice and elevated hepatic enzyme levels reappeared, with ultrasound revealing an enlarged liver with diffuse echogenicity. Again, the patient completely recovered within weeks after cessation of diltiazem therapy (Lafuente & Egea, 2000).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Acute renal failure has been reported, usually in patients who develop severe prolonged hypotension and/or rhabdomyolysis after severe poisoning (Weinberg et al, 2014; Plumb et al, 2011; Ghosh & Sircar, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman intentionally ingested a handful of her amlodipine and losartan approximately 3 hours prior to arrival (the estimated doses were 770 mg of amlodipine and 16640 mg of losartan). She was initially stable but developed a spontaneous drop in blood pressure that was refractory to multiple therapies. Despite 5 L of IV fluids, hypotension persisted. Additional therapies included, noradrenaline (0.1 mcg/kg/min), metaraminol (0.5 mg bolus only) and 10% calcium gluconate (20 mL). Following contact with a poison center, vasopressin, glucagon, hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia (HIE) therapies and 20% intralipid therapy were initiated with minimal clinical improvement. Eighteen hours after presentation, hypotension remained refractory to multiple therapies and the patient was anuric with acute renal injury. She also developed severe metabolic acidosis. A metaraminol infusion was begun approximately 47 hours after admission with an immediate sustained improvement in blood pressure and a significant increase in urine output. Other inotropes were gradually weaned and the patient clinically improved (Plumb et al, 2011).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man, with a history of mild renal insufficiency, developed severe hypotension and acute renal failure following an overdose ingestion of amlodipine 50 mg. He was oliguric and laboratory data revealed blood urea and serum creatinine concentrations of 79 mg/dL and 4.3 mg/dL, respectively, and a serum potassium concentration of 7.8 mEq/L. With supportive care, including hemodialysis, the patient gradually recovered and was discharged approximately 10 days postingestion (Ghosh & Sircar, 2008).
    B) OLIGURIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman developed hypotension, oliguria, and respiratory failure after ingesting 27 tablets of 5 mg amlodipine. She was treated with intravenous lipid emulsion. Based on a written lipid emulsion therapy protocol, a maximum of 387.5 mL of intralipid for a 50 kg patient was ordered and treatment was started 12.5 hours after presentation. However, she inadvertently received a total of 2000 mL of 20% intralipid which ran for 4.5 hours (greater than 5 times the maximum suggested dose). There were no obvious clinical effects from the intravenous lipid overdose aside from lipemic serum. Because of severe lipemia, no metabolic panel and CBC analysis could be obtained. On hospital day 2, the treatment team felt that recovery from the amlodipine overdose was unlikely. After her family decided to withdraw care, she died within the next 24 hours (West et al, 2010).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Thrombocytopenia has been reported in less than 1% of patients being treated with amlodipine (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old woman developed severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count of 12,000/mm(3)) 3 days after beginning amlodipine therapy, 10 mg/day. The patient also experienced recurrent epistaxis and severe vaginal bleeding. Three days after stopping amlodipine therapy, the patient's platelet count improved and the epistaxis and the vaginal bleeding resolved (Usalan et al, 1999).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FLUSHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Flushing was one of the most common adverse effects reported during amlodipine therapy of up to 10 mg daily (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GYNECOMASTIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Gynecomastia is a rare occurrence with calcium channel blocker therapy (Prod Info amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, 2007; Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Amlodipine has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. It is unknown if amlodipine is excreted in breast milk. In animal studies, there was no evidence of teratogenicity or other embryo-fetal toxicity.
    B) The combination product amlodipine/perindopril arginine has been classified as FDA pregnancy category D.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) FIRST TRIMESTER EXPOSURE
    1) CASE REPORTS: In 3 hypertensive pregnant women exposed to amlodipine (5 mg/day) in the first trimester, no congenital malformations occurred in 2 of the 3 cases. The first case, a 35-year-old woman on amlodipine for 36 months, decided to stop therapy upon detection of pregnancy at 7 weeks. Ultrasound at week 23 showed normal fetal growth and no congenital malformations. At week 38, a female baby (weight 3750 grams) was born, with an Apgar score of 9 and 10 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Two weeks after discharge, amlodipine was restarted, and the baby, who was exclusively breast fed, was healthy and showed normal neurodevelopment at 3 months. In the second case, a 32-year-old woman was treated with amlodipine during weeks 2 to 3 of gestation, and later switched to atenolol until week 6 when pregnancy was discovered. The patient declined to continue further therapy and BP was relatively well maintained during the pregnancy. Ultrasound at week 22 showed a small gastric chamber and mild ascites in the lower abdomen in the fetus. At week 39, a female baby (weight 2600 grams) was born via normal delivery. Apgar scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 m–inutes, respectively, and no gross malformations were evident. Although the infant showed intellectual delay, and weakness of her left arm and hand grasp at 20 months. Given the limited exposure, these effects were not attributed to amlodipine. In the third case, a 36-year-old woman had received prior therapy with an ACE inhibitor and was switched to amlodipine at week 7 of pregnancy. The patient was also taking lorazepam, sucralfate, and occasionally drank alcohol. Ultrasound at week 8 revealed an embryo pole with normal cardiac activity. Amlodipine therapy was continued. However, absence of fetal cardiac activity on ultrasound at week 12 led to dilatation and evacuation of a dead embryo (Ahn et al, 2007).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Teratogenicity, or other embryo/fetal toxicity was not evident in animal studies with oral doses up to 10 mg/kg/day during periods of major organogenesis. However, litter size was significantly decreased, while fetal mortality was significantly increased, in rats receiving oral doses up to 10 mg/kg/day (approximately 8 times the human dose) for 14 days before mating, throughout mating, and during gestation. Parturition and gestation were also prolonged in rats given this dose (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There are no adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified amlodipine as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) The manufacturer has classified amlodipine/perindopril arginine as FDA pregnancy category D (Prod Info PRESTALIA(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) AMLODIPINE
    1) It is not known if amlodipine is excreted into human milk (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013). In one case, a baby was healthy and showed normal neurodevelopment at 3 months after being exclusively breast fed by a mother receiving amlodipine 5 mg/day (Ahn et al, 2007).
    B) AMLODIPINE/PERINDOPRIL ARGININE
    1) Lactation studies with the perindopril arginine/amlodipine combination have not been conducted in humans. It is unknown whether perindopril or amlodipine are excreted in human milk. Radioactivity was detected in the milk of lactating rats following treatment with 14C-perindopril. Due to the potential for adverse events in the nursing infant, a decision should be made to either discontinue nursing or discontinue perindopril arginine/amlodipine taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother (Prod Info PRESTALIA(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Mild to moderate metabolic acidosis or mixed metabolic/respiratory acidosis has been reported following amlodipine exposure (Meaney et al, 2013; Devasahayam et al, 2012; Smith et al, 2008; Ghosh & Sircar, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: Mild metabolic acidosis was reported in a 42-year-old woman after an overdose of 50 to 100 mg amlodipine with beer (Stanek et al, 1997).
    c) CASE REPORT: Mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis (pH 6.8, pCO2 115 mmHg, pO2 76 mmHg, HCO3 16 mmol/L) was reported in a 65-year-old man who developed severe hypotension and acute renal failure following an overdose ingestion of amlodipine 50 mg. The patient gradually recovered with supportive care (Ghosh & Sircar, 2008).
    d) CASE REPORT: Severe lactic acidosis (lactic acid level 24 mmol/L [reference range, 0.5 to 2.2 mmol/L]) with an anion gap of 18 was reported in a 60-year-old woman who self-medicated with her husband's prescription of amlodipine 10 mg orally twice daily for 10 days after running out of her own nifedipine prescription (Devasahayam et al, 2012).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Serum amlodipine concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    B) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    D) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    E) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    F) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    G) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Blood concentrations of calcium antagonists are not readily available. Blood concentrations generally do not predict toxicity or direct management, but may be of forensic or pharmacokinetic interest.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium) and renal function.
    3) Monitor serum glucose. Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity (Levine et al, 2007).
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor respiratory function with pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor cardiovascular status to include blood pressure, ECG, and urinary output.
    b) Monitor respiratory function as clinically indicated; pulmonary edema may occur.
    c) Monitor mental status; CNS depression due to direct drug effects, cardiovascular disruptions, and coingestion of CNS depressants is common. Seizures are rare but may occur.
    d) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning (Kamijo et al, 2006).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who show the following signs of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991):
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Hypotension or bradycardia; conduction system abnormalities; AV block; asystole; congestive heart failure
    2) RESPIRATORY: Pulmonary edema
    3) GASTROINTESTINAL: Nausea or vomiting
    4) GENITOURINARY: Renal insufficiency
    5) NEUROLOGICAL: Seizures; altered mental status
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) According to the AAPCC guidelines, a healthy, asymptomatic adult with a single inadvertent ingestion of amlodipine 10 mg or less can be monitored at home. For children, ingestions of less than 0.3 mg/kg of amlodipine can be monitored at home (Olson et al, 2005).
    B) A retrospective study was conducted of 161 patients who inadvertently ingested double their usual dose of calcium channel blocker or more. Of the 104 patients who ingested double their usual dose, 9 (9%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. Four of these symptomatic patients had ingested less than or equal to the maximum single dose for the drug, and another four had ingested a dose in between the maximum single dose and the maximum daily dose. Of the 57 patients who had ingested more than double their usual daily dose, 8 (14%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. All of these patients had ingested an amount equal to or greater than the maximal daily dose. The toxicity of calcium antagonists following a therapeutic overdose can be highly variable; this could be due to the broad range of therapeutic doses and the pre-existing conditions in these patients. Because of this variability, home management may be difficult; poison centers should be conservative in their evaluation of these cases (Cantrell et al, 2005).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a healthcare facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring.
    1) Based on amlodipine's time to peak concentration (Tmax) of 6 to 12 hours (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2015), patients should be observed for at least 6 hours after an amlodipine ingestion, until they are clearly improving and clinically stable.
    B) According to the AAPCC guidelines, patients with an inadvertent single ingestion of amlodipine doses greater than 10 mg should be referred to a healthcare facility. For children, ingestions of greater than 0.3 mg/kg of amlodipine should be referred to a healthcare facility (Olson et al, 2005).
    C) CHILDREN LESS THAN 6 YEARS OF AGE: Based on 5 retrospective case reviews involving calcium channel blocker ingestions in children less than 6-years-old, patients should be observed in-hospital for 6 hours following ingestion of regular-release medications (Ranniger & Roche, 2007).
    1) CASE SERIES: According to case reviews of pediatric amlodipine-only ingestions, using National Poison Data System (NPDS) data from 2000 to 2003 (n=1251), the lowest reported ingestion to produce a clinically important response in children less than 6 years of age was 2.5 mg. Within this retrospective analysis, a clinically important response was defined as hypotension, bradycardia, other dysrhythmia (ie, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes), or hyperglycemia. Therefore, it is recommended that children less than 6 years of age who ingest 2.5 mg or more of amlodipine should be referred to a healthcare facility for evaluation (Benson et al, 2010).

Monitoring

    A) Serum amlodipine concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    B) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    C) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    D) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    E) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    F) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    G) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Because an amlodipine overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated who have ingested a very large dose of amlodipine. There is a report of an adult treated with whole-bowel irrigation following an amlodipine ingestion of 1000 mg. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    2) If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Single doses of activated charcoal are recommended. While not proven effective, administration of a second dose should be considered especially in the setting of sustained-release dosage form ingestion or coingestion of drugs or chemicals which could delay gastric emptying or slow intestinal motility (Krenzelok, 1991) .
    2) In a volunteer study, administration of activated charcoal 2 or 4 hours after ingestion of slow-release verapamil decreased absorption by 35% and 32% respectively (Laine et al, 1997a). Delayed administration of activated charcoal was not effective in reducing absorption of a conventional formulation of verapamil (Laine et al, 1997).
    3) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    4) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Gastric lavage, followed by administration of activated charcoal, is recommended in patients with significant ingestions. A large bore orogastric tube is preferred due to the large size of some sustained-release dosage forms.
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) In general, whole bowel irrigation has been used with other calcium channel blocker exposures following activated charcoal to limit absorption from possible concretions and sustained release products. It should only be performed in patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated. Whole bowel irrigation should not be performed in patients that are hemodynamically unstable (Rankin & Edwards, 1990; Sporer & Manning, 1993; Buckley et al, 1993; Hendren et al, 1989).
    2) Repeat charcoal following whole bowel irrigation since the PEG/electrolyte solution may desorb drug from charcoal. If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    3) CASE REPORT/AMLODIPINE: Whole bowel irrigation was used following a massive overdose of amlodipine (1000 mg) alone in a 40-year-old woman. Initially, the patient received 75 g of activated charcoal via an orogastric tube. WBI was performed by having the patient drink an oral solution of polyethylene glycol and electrolytes at a rate of 2 L per hour (Harris, 2006).
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    E) ENDOSCOPY
    1) BACKGROUND: Following overdose of sustained release verapamil, concretions have occasionally been reported within the stomach or intestines. They are often not visible on plain x-ray films of the abdomen; gastrointestinal emptying methods to remove the concretions have not been proven. Endoscopy may be necessary following severe toxicity or prolonged symptoms (Prod Info CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, 2013).
    2) AMLODIPINE: It is NOT available in extended release or sustained release formulations and there are no reports of concretion formation following overdose of amlodipine.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion (calcium chloride is preferred) may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Serum amlodipine concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    2) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    3) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    4) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, and renal function. In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    5) Obtain digoxin concentration in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    6) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    7) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning (Kamijo et al, 2006).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) FLUIDS
    a) INDICATION: Loss of systemic vascular resistance requires an increase in circulating volume. Complete response to fluids alone should not be expected, but volume replacement is a necessary component. Administer IV 0.9% NaCl at 10 to 20 mL/kg and place the patient in supine position. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    b) CAUTION: Monitor for signs of pulmonary edema (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    2) CALCIUM
    a) INDICATIONS: Calcium is used to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is noncompetitive (DeRoos, 2011; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993), but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    b) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985); however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops(Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994). Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration.
    d) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    e) HYPERCALCEMIA: Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves within 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects (clinical or ECG) from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    1) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia with concentrations as high as 19.2 mg/dL (9.9 mg/dL upper limit of normal) secondary to treatment with calcium salts have been reported during aggressive therapy (Buckley et al, 1993) without adverse effects secondary to hypercalcemia. Such aggressive treatment with calcium salts may be necessary to reverse conduction defects (Howarth et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia (16.3 mg/dL) occurred following aggressive calcium chloride treatment in a 45-year-old woman following an overdose ingestion of sustained-release diltiazem. There were no ECG manifestations due to the hypercalcemia and the patient recovered uneventfully over the next 4 days (Hantsch et al, 1997).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    g) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Calcium chloride can cause tissue injury following extravasation; administer calcium chloride via central venous catheter. Hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia may also occur following repeat dosing or continuous infusion; monitor serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Nausea, vomiting, flushing, constipation, confusion, and angina have also been reported in patients receiving calcium (DeRoos, 2011).
    3) INSULIN/DEXTROSE
    a) DOSE
    1) Intravenous insulin infusion with supplemental dextrose, and potassium as needed, is recommended in patients with severe or persistent hypotension after a calcium channel blocker overdose (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004).
    2) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 units/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to determine the need for higher rates of insulin infusion (Lheureux et al, 2006). In some refractory cases, more aggressive high-dose insulin protocols have been suggested, starting with a 1 unit/kg insulin bolus, followed by a 1 unit/kg/hour continuous infusion. If there is no clinical improvement in the patient, the infusion rate may be increased by 2 units/kg/hour every 10 minutes, up to a maximum of 10 units/kg/hour (Engebretsen et al, 2011).
    3) Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued.
    4) Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium less than 2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    5) Monitor blood pressure, pulse, ECG, mental status, serum glucose and potassium, urine output, and if possible cardiac function by way of echocardiogram/ultrasound, right heart catheter.
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) SUMMARY: Insulin/dextrose infusions were administered to 5 patients who experienced severe circulatory shock following intentional calcium channel blocker overdose ingestions and who were unresponsive to conventional treatment. Blood pressures normalized within hours after receiving the infusions and all 5 patients recovered without sequelae. In 3 of the 4 patients, insulin and dextrose were administered as bolus doses, 10 units and 25 grams, respectively, with the subsequent administration of insulin infusion, the dose ranging from 0.1 units/kg/hr to 1 units/kg/hr, and dextrose (50% w/v) infusion, the dose ranging from 5 grams/hour to 15 grams/hr, via a central venous catheter. Each patient also received other supportive measures and inotropic agents (Yuan et al, 1999).
    2) Insulin infusions, with or without dextrose given concurrently, were administered to several hemodynamically unstable patients following calcium antagonist intoxication who were refractory to conventional therapy. Blood pressures in all patients normalized within hours after receiving the insulin (Agarwal et al, 2012; Azendour et al, 2010; Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007; Greene et al, 2007; Boyer et al, 2002).
    3) One study reviewed 13 case reports where high-dose insulin (10 to 20 units in 6 patients; 1 patient received 1000 units inadvertently; infusion rates 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr; duration either a single bolus dose or infusions for 5 to 96 hours) with supplemental dextrose and potassium (HDIDK) were used to treat calcium channel blockers overdose. These patients failed to respond clinically to other therapies. Twelve patients survived. HDIDK therapy was beneficial in seriously intoxicated patients with CCB-induced hypotension, hyperglycemia, and metabolic acidosis. However, this therapy did not consistently reverse bradycardia, heart block and intraventricular conduction delay (Shepherd & Klein-Schwartz, 2005).
    4) TISSUE PERFUSION MONITORING: A 51-year-old man presented to the emergency department after ingesting 40 25-mg metoprolol tablets and an unknown amount of 5 mg amlodipine tablets. The patient was obtunded with vital signs indicating hypotension (systolic blood pressure in the 50s) and bradycardia (heart rate in the 20s). The patient was intubated and treatment included IV epinephrine and calcium gluconate boluses, and high dose insulin started at 1 unit/kg/hour. Repeat vital sign measurements demonstrated a blood pressure of 79/49 and a heart rate of 39. Tissue perfusion monitoring was started with an initial reading of 69% (normal 75% to 85%). An epinephrine infusion was initiated at 0.1 mcg/kg/hour and his high dose insulin infusion was increased to 10 units/kg/hour, resulting in an increase in the tissue perfusion monitoring measurements to 73% to 75% in direct correlation with mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurements ranging from 56 to 64 mmHg. Following transfer to an intensive care setting, tissue perfusion monitoring was used over the next 2 days to guide resuscitative efforts, with monitor readings increasing to the high 70s resulting in discontinuation of epinephrine and high dose insulin therapy. It is suggested that tissue perfusion monitoring correlates well with MAP measurements, used as a surrogate measure of tissue perfusion, and may be helpful in guiding high dose insulin therapy in patients with beta blocker and calcium channel blocker overdoses (Paetow et al, 2015).
    4) VASOPRESSOR AGENTS
    a) INDICATION: Direct acting alpha-agonists mediate vasoconstriction by mechanisms independent of calcium influx and are preferred (Jaeger et al, 1989), although normal vascular response cannot be expected. In case review series, dopamine is the most commonly cited agent, followed by epinephrine, isoproterenol, and norepinephrine (Watling et al, 1992; Erickson et al, 1991).
    b) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed severe hypotension following calcium antagonist poisoning. Despite administration of fluids and vasopressor agents, hypotension persisted. SvO2 was continuously monitored in both patients, using a fiberoptic pulmonary catheter, in order to detect tissue hypoxia. The SvO2 remained between 71% and 85%, indicating adequate tissue oxygenation, and metabolic acidosis did not occur. Gradually, the hypotension of both patients resolved without more aggressive administration of vasopressor therapy, suggesting that higher infusion rates of vasopressor agents may not be necessary in patients with refractory hypotension, provided that tissue hypoxia can be excluded after volume resuscitation. Continuous SvO2 monitoring, using a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter, may be a useful index of tissue oxygenation (Kamijo et al, 2006).
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) Case reports have described the use of higher than conventional doses of dopamine (up to 40 to 50 mcg/kg/min) in patients with refractory hypotension after calcium antagonist overdose (Evans & Oram, 1999). Consider high rates of infusion in patients with refractory hypotension.
    7) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    2) DOSE
    a) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    b) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    8) EPINEPHRINE
    a) EPINEPHRINE
    1) ADULT
    a) BOLUS DOSE: 1 mg intravenously/intraosseously every 3 to 5 minutes to treat cardiac arrest (Link et al, 2015).
    b) INFUSION: Prepare by adding 1 mg (1 mL of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution) to 250 mL D5W, yielding a concentration of 4 mcg/mL, and infuse this solution IV at a rate of 1 mcg/min to 10 mcg/min (maximum rate) (Lieberman et al, 2010). Used primarily for severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure 70 mm Hg), or anaphylaxis associated with hemodynamic or respiratory compromise, may also be used for symptomatic bradycardia if atropine and transcutaneous pacing are unsuccessful or not immediately available (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: INTRAVENOUS/INTRAOSSEOUS: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.01 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution); maximum 1 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 3 to 5 minutes (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sorrentino, 2005). ENDOTRACHEAL: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.1 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution). Maximum 2.5 mg/dose (maximum total dose: 10 mg). May repeat every 3 to 5 minutes (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008). Follow ET administration with saline flush or dilute in isotonic saline (1 to 5 mL) based on the child's size (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    b) INFUSION: Used for the treatment of refractory hypotension, bradycardia, severe anaphylaxis. DOSE: 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min, titrate dose; start at lowest dose needed to reach desired clinical effects. Doses as high as 5 mcg/kg/min may sometimes be necessary. High dose epinephrine infusion may be useful in the setting of beta blocker poisoning (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    3) CAUTION
    a) Extravasation may cause severe local tissue ischemia (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008); infusion through a central venous catheter is advised.
    b) Epinephrine has been found to be useful in other cases of calcium channel blocker (ie, diltiazem, verapamil) overdose. However, multiple vasopressors are likely to be needed to maintain clinical improvement following a significant overdose (Harris, 2006; Levine et al, 2013).
    c) Large doses may be required (Levine et al, 2013).
    d) One-time bolus doses of 1 mg have been used in addition to bolus-infusion regimens (Erickson et al, 1991). Epinephrine 1 mg bolus followed by 0.2 to 0.6 mcg/kg/min improved both SBP and urine flow for 18 hours (Henderson et al, 1992). Infusion rates up to 100 mcg/min have been reported (Anthony et al, 1986).
    9) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    10) CAUTIONS: Normal vascular response may not be seen. Doses of isoproterenol, while beneficial to cardiac conduction (beta-1 effect), may worsen peripheral vascular resistance (beta-2 effects) (Krenzelok, 1991).
    11) PHENYLEPHRINE
    a) PHENYLEPHRINE
    1) MILD OR MODERATE HYPOTENSION
    a) INTRAVENOUS: ADULT: Usual dose: 0.2 mg; range: 0.1 mg to 0.5 mg. Maximum initial dose is 0.5 mg. A 0.5 mg IV dose can elevate the blood pressure for approximately 15 min (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011). PEDIATRIC: Usual bolus dose: 5 to 20 mcg/kg IV repeated every 10 to 15 min as needed (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    2) CONTINUOUS INFUSION
    a) PREPARATION: Add 10 mg (1 mL of a 1% solution) to 500 mL of normal saline or dextrose 5% in water to produce a final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.
    b) ADULT DOSE: To raise blood pressure rapidly; start an initial infusion of 100 to 180 mcg/min until blood pressure stabilizes; then reduce infusion to 40 to 60 mcg/min titrated to desired effect. If necessary, additional doses in increments of 10 mg or more may be added to the infusion solution and the rate of flow titrated to the desired effect (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Intravenous infusion should begin at 0.1 to 0.5 mcg/kg/min; titrate to the desired effect (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    3) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Headache, reflex bradycardia, excitability, restlessness and rarely dysrhythmias may develop (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    12) DOBUTAMINE
    a) DOBUTAMINE
    1) DOSE: ADULT: Infuse at 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV. PEDIATRIC: Infuse at 2 to 20 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV or intraosseous, titrated to desired effect (Peberdy et al, 2010; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate if ventricular ectopy develops (Prod Info dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, 2012).
    13) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    d) In a canine model of severe verapamil overdose glucagon (2.5 mg bolus followed by an infusion of 2.5 mg over 1 hour) increased cardiac output and heart rate and restored sinus rhythm without affecting mean arterial pressure or total peripheral resistance (Stone et al, 1995).
    14) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) INAMRINONE
    1) INAMRINONE
    a) PREPARATION: Dilute solution for infusion to a final concentration of 1 to 3 milligrams per milliliter in normal saline (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ADULT DOSE: Loading dose of 0.75 milligram/kilogram over 2 to 3 minutes followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram per minute titrate to hemodynamic response. Repeat initial loading dose after 30 minutes if necessary (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: The safety and effectiveness of inamrinone in the pediatric population has not been established (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    d) CAUTIONS: May cause hypotension and dysrhythmias (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ENOXIMONE
    1) CASE REPORT/VERAPAMIL: After ingesting 2800 mg of atenolol and 1600 mg of verapamil, a 57-year-old man with a history of ischemic heart disease (2 previous acute myocardial infarctions) developed hypotension (BP 80/50 mmHg), and bradycardia (40 beats/min). An ECG revealed a sinus bradycardia with a first-degree heart block, previously absent. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, only a modest hemodynamic effect was observed. Following treatment with a bolus of enoximone 1 mg/kg and a continuous infusion at 0.5 mcg/kg/min for 5 days, his hemodynamic status improved. The authors suggested that enoximone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, may be an alternative agent to glucagon as they have an inotropic effect which is not mediated by a beta receptor (Sandroni et al, 2004).
    15) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    b) MECHANISM: Carnitine is synthesized in several human organs, including liver and kidneys. It is produced from amino acids lysine and methionine in 2 optical isomeric forms with only L-carnitine being the biological active isomer. It transports fatty acids from the cellular cytoplasm into the mitochondrial matrix by the carnitine shuttle. The fatty acids undergo beta-oxidation to form acetyl-CoA in the mitochondrial matrix. It then enters the Krebs cycle to produce cellular energy. In one animal study, it was proposed that verapamil toxicity changed the cardiac metabolism from free fatty acids to carbohydrate. It has been suggested that L-carnitine in combination with high-dose insulin can decrease insulin resistance, promote intracellular glucose transport, increase the uptake and hepatic beta-oxidation of fatty acids, and increase calcium channel sensitivity in patients with calcium channel blocker toxicity (Perez et al, 2011; St-Onge et al, 2013).
    c) ANIMAL STUDY: In a controlled, blinded animal study, 16 male rats were anesthetized and received a constant infusion of 5 mg/kg/hr of verapamil to produce severe verapamil toxicity. All animals received a bolus of 50 mg/kg of either L-carnitine or normal saline 5 minutes later. Mean arterial pressures (MAP) and heart rates of animals were recorded at baseline and at 15 and 30 minutes after the start of the experiment. The survival time was evaluated using the length of time (in minutes) from the initiation of verapamil until either the MAP had reached 10% of the baseline values or 150 minutes had passed without a suitable reduction in blood pressure. Animals in the L-carnitine group survived a median time of 140.75 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 98.6 to 150 minutes) as compared with 49.19 minutes (IQR = 39.2 to 70.97 minutes; p=0.0001) in the normal saline group. All animals in the L-carnitine group and one in the saline group survived over 90 minutes. Four animals in the L-carnitine group also survived the 150-minute protocol. At 15 minutes, a higher mean MAP was observed in the carnitine group (63 mm Hg; SD +/- 19.4 mmHg) as compared with the saline group (42.6 mmHg; SD +/- 22.9 mmHg; p=0.047; a difference of 20.4 mmHg; 95% CI = 0.25 to 40.65 mmHg) (Perez et al, 2011).
    d) AMLODIPINE/METFORMIN OVERDOSE: A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type II diabetes, benign prostate hypertrophy, and chronic anemia, ingested 300 mg of amlodipine, 3500 mg of metformin, and ethanol in a suicide attempt. He presented pale, diaphoretic, and hemodynamically unstable (BP 56/42 mmHg, heart rate 77 beats/min). Laboratory results revealed a blood glucose concentration of 13 mmol/L, serum creatinine of 103 mcmol/L (normal, 50 to 100 mcmol/L), serum sodium of 126 mmol/L, and an increased CK of 871 mmol/L. The arterial blood gas analysis an hour later showed a pH of 7, pCO2 of 42, bicarbonate of 10 mmol/L, and lactate of 14.1 mmol/L (anion-gap of 22). Despite supportive therapy for 10 hours, including calcium, glucagon, vasopressors, high-dose insulin (HDI; even after more than 1 hour of infusion at 320 Units/hr), dextrose, lipid emulsion, and bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis, he remained in shock (BP 110/50 mmHg, norepinephrine running at 80 mcg/min), hyperglycemic (33 mmol/L), oliguric, and acidotic. Continuous renal replacement therapy was not initiated because he was considered too unstable. About 11 hours after presentation, he received L-carnitine 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours. His condition began to improve about 30 minutes after L-carnitine loading dose and his norepinephrine requirement continued to decrease. Vasopressors were discontinued within 36 hours of initial presentation and he was extubated successfully within 4 days of presentation. His serum amlodipine concentration was 83 ng/mL (therapeutic: 3 to 11 ng/mL) upon arrival and peaked at 160 ng/mL several hours later. His metformin concentration was 24 mcg/mL (therapeutic: 1 to 2 mcg/mL) upon arrival (St-Onge et al, 2013).
    16) VASOPRESSIN
    a) AMLODIPINE AND DILTIAZEM: Two patients were given vasopressin infusions for the treatment of refractory hypotension following intentional ingestions of amlodipine 800 mg and 4800 mg of sustained-release diltiazem, respectively. The vasopressin infusion, in the first patient, was initiated at a rate of 2.4 International Units (IU)/hour and titrated to 4.8 IU/hour over two hours. The second patient received a 20 IU bolus of vasopressin followed by a 4 IU/hour infusion. The hypotension resolved in both patients and they were subsequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (Kanagarajan et al, 2007).
    b) ANIMAL STUDY: In a porcine model, 18 anesthetized swine, each receiving a verapamil infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr until the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased to 70% of baseline, were divided into two groups: one group that received a vasopressin infusion of 0.01 units/kg/min (n=8) and the control group that received an equal volume of normal saline (n=10). MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output were then measured every 5 minutes until t=60 minutes. The results showed that there was no significant difference in MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output between the two groups. Four of 8 animals in the vasopressin group died as compared with 2 of 10 animals in the control group. Death appeared to be related to hypotension and low cardiac output. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that treatment with vasopressin actually decreased the survival of swine following verapamil intoxication as compared to the swine treated with normal saline alone (Barry et al, 2005).
    17) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) ANIMAL DATA: In a study involving swine to determine the efficacy of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate in treating hypotension associated with severe verapamil toxicity, it was determined that swine, treated with 4 mEq/kg of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate given intravenously over 4 minutes, experienced a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output as compared with animals in the control group, who were given 0.6% sodium chloride in 10% mannitol (Tanen et al, 2000).
    18) METARAMINOL
    a) AMLODIPINE AND LOSARTAN: A 50-year-old woman intentionally ingested a handful of amlodipine (estimated dose 770 mg) and losartan (estimated dose 16640 mg) approximately 3 hours prior to arrival. She was initially stable but developed a spontaneous drop in blood pressure (70/40 mm Hg) shortly after admission. Despite 5 L of fluids, noradrenaline (0.1 mcg/kg/min), metaraminol (0.5 mg bolus only) and 10% calcium gluconate (20 mL), hypotension persisted. Following contact with a poison center, vasopressin, glucagon and hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia (HIE) therapies were initiated. HIE was started at a rate of 6 Units/kg/hr over the next 12 hours with no sustained clinical improvement in hypotension. This was followed by the initiation of 20% intralipid therapy (initial 150 mL bolus) at an infusion rate of 3 mL/kg/hr (total dose 650 mL). Eighteen hours after presentation, hypotension was refractory to multiple therapies and the patient was anuric with acute renal injury. A metaraminol infusion was begun approximately 47 hours after admission with an immediate sustained improvement in blood pressure and a significant increase in urine output. Other inotropes were gradually weaned and the patient gradually improved. She was discharged about a week after hospitalization with no permanent sequelae (Plumb et al, 2011).
    b) AMLODIPINE: A 43-year-old man developed hypotension (BP 65/40 mmHg) after ingesting 560 mg of amlodipine. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, glucagon and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, there was no hemodynamic response. Following treatment with metaraminol (a loading bolus of 2 mg [equivalent to 25 mcg/kg] and intravenous infusion of 1 mcg/kg/min [83 mcg/min] for 36 hours), there was improvement in his blood pressure, cardiac output and urine output (Wood et al, 2005).
    19) TERLIPRESSIN
    a) FELODIPINE: A 61-year-old man developed hypotension (75/50 mmHg on admission) after ingesting 140 mg of felodipine. Despite administration of epinephrine and norepinephrine, the patient's hypotension persisted (mean arterial pressure 47 mmHg). A continuous infusion of 0.05 mcg/kg/min of terlipressin, a vasopressor, was initiated, resulting in the mean arterial pressure increasing from 47 to 95 mmHg; systemic vascular resistance and SvO2 also increased (Leone et al, 2005).
    D) FAT EMULSION
    1) Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been effective in reversing severe cardiovascular toxicity from local anesthetic overdose in animal studies and human case reports. Several animal studies and human case reports have also evaluated the use of ILE for patients following exposure to other drugs. Although the results of these studies are mixed, there is increasing evidence that it can rapidly reverse cardiovascular toxicity and improve mental function for a wide variety of lipid soluble drugs. It may be reasonable to consider ILE in patients with severe symptoms who are failing standard resuscitative measures (Lavonas et al, 2015).
    2) The American College of Medical Toxicology has issued the following guidelines for lipid resuscitation therapy (LRT) in the management of overdose in cases involving a highly lipid soluble xenobiotic where the patient is hemodynamically unstable, unresponsive to standard resuscitation measures (ie, fluid replacement, inotropes and pressors). The decision to use LRT is based on the judgement of the treating physician. When possible, it is recommended these therapies be administered with the consultation of a medical toxicologist (American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016; American College of Medical Toxicology, 2011):
    a) Initial intravenous bolus of 1.5 mL/kg 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid) over 2 to 3 minutes. Asystolic patients or patients with pulseless electrical activity may have a repeat dose, if there is no response to the initial bolus.
    b) Follow with an intravenous infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min of 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid). Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion.
    c) If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources.
    d) Where possible, LRT should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    3) AMLODIPINE EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman, with a history of alcohol abuse, intentionally ingested 70 tablets of amlodipine 5 mg and an unknown amount of ethanol and was admitted to the ED within one hour of exposure. Her initial heart rate was 113 beats/min and blood pressure was 103/57 mm Hg with a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 72 mm Hg. An ECG showed accelerated junctional rhythm with a QTc interval of 429 ms and QRS interval of 92 ms. She was initially given 75 g of activated charcoal and 3 L of normal saline (NS). Within 2 hours of admission, her blood pressure continued to decline (89/57 mm Hg) and calcium gluconate (2 g bolus) and a 20% intralipid (100 mL) bolus were given with temporary improvement. The patient was transferred to the ICU. About 5 hours after exposure, she developed shock (MAP 38 to 52 mm Hg) and became hemodynamically unstable. Vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, and phenylephrine) were immediately added and another 6 L of NS were given. In addition, calcium chloride 40 mg/kg/hr, glucagon 10 mg/hr and an insulin infusion at 5 units/hr (titrated to 15 units/hr) were started. An echocardiogram showed that systemic vascular resistance was severely reduced along with a hyperdynamic left ventricle. Eight hours after exposure, metabolic acidosis occurred and sodium bicarbonate was added. A 20% lipid infusion (started at 100 mL/hr then rapidly increased to 500 mL/hr) was administered for ongoing hypotension; a total of 2300 mL (20.9 mL/kg infusion total) was infused over 4.5 hours. Vasopressor therapies were weaned within 12 hours of starting the lipid infusion; glucagon and calcium were also discontinued a short time later. Throughout the remainder of her hospital course, her blood pressure remained stable and she was transferred to a clinical floor on day 4 and discharged to home on day 8 (Meaney et al, 2013).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman with a medical history of hypertension, emphysema, and depression presented 1.5 hours after ingesting 27 tablets of amlodipine 5 mg. She was alert, oriented, and in no distress, and her vital signs were: temperature 36.6 degrees C, blood pressure (BP 85/44 mm Hg), pulse (heart rate, 79 beats/min), respiratory rate (20/min). An initial laboratory result revealed hyponatremia and anemia; all other laboratory results were normal. She developed hypotension (systolic BP, 79 mmHg) 2 hours later. Despite symptomatic therapy, she remained hypotensive in the ICU, and her urine output decreased to 10 mL/hr. Her condition deteriorated and pulmonary edema was noted clinically and on chest x-ray. She was intubated and her peri-intubation arterial blood gas (ABG) revealed pH=7.17, pCO2=31, and pO2=80. Based on a written lipid emulsion therapy protocol (written protocol: Intralipid 20%: 1.5 mL/kg over 1 min; then an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min; max total dose, 8 mL/kg. In practice, for an adult weighing 70 kg: take a 500 mL bag of Intralipid 20% and a 50 mL syringe; draw up 50 mL and give stat IV, x 2; then attach the bag to an IV administration set (macrodrip) and run it IV over the next 25 minutes), a maximum of 387.5 mL of intralipid for a 50 kg patient was ordered and treatment was started 12.5 hours after presentation. However, she inadvertently received a total of 2000 mL of 20% intralipid which ran for 4.5 hours (greater than 5 times the maximum suggested dose). Because of severe lipemia, no metabolic panel and CBC analysis could be obtained. There were no other obvious clinical affects from the intravenous lipid overdose. On hospital day 2, the treatment team felt that recovery from the amlodipine overdose was unlikely. After her family decided to withdraw care, she died within the next 24 hours (West et al, 2010).
    c) OTHER CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old woman intentionally ingested 80 tablets of sustained release verapamil (total dose 19.2 g). She was decontaminated with multiple doses of activated charcoal. Fourteen hours after exposure, the patient suddenly became lethargic with a decrease in oxygen saturation requiring a 100% non-rebreather. She became hypotensive and bradycardic; a third degree AV block was noted on ECG. Initial treatment included calcium, fluids, dopamine and isoproterenol; norepinephrine, epinephrine and vasopressin were added with only temporary improvement of hypotension. Other treatments included intubation and transvenous pacing and hyperglycemia-euglycemia insulin therapy and glucagon. Acute renal failure developed and CVVH was started. On hospital day 4, lipid therapy (100 mL bolus of 20% intralipid followed by 0.5 mL/kg/hr; total dose: 4200 mL over 7 days) was begun. Within 3 hours, the norepinephrine dose was reduced and within 48 hours vasopressin was stopped. By day 6, transvenous pacing was no longer needed. Despite cardiac improvement, her clinical course was further complicated by the development of a pneumatosis intestinalis necessitating an urgent colectomy. On day 55, the patient was discharged to a skilled nursing facility (Liang et al, 2011).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old man intentionally ingested large quantities of multiple medications, one of which was 13.44 g of verapamil. He was found 12 hours later to be poorly responsive with incoherent speech and hypotensive (69/26 mmHg) with a pulse of 55 beats/min. Fluids, pressors, calcium and glucagon were all administered, but he remained hypotensive with junctional bradycardia, metabolic acidosis and renal insufficiency. Then, upon transfer, 100 mL of 20% lipids was infused followed by a 0.5 mL/kg/hr infusion for 24 hours. Blood pressure improved within an hour of initiation of intravenous lipid emulsion, and he made a full recovery (Young et al, 2009).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with dyspnea, chest tightness, lethargy, diaphoresis, and hypotension (76/41 mmHg) after intentionally ingesting 17 240-mg tablets of extended release verapamil (total dose ingested 4.08 g). Despite treatment with IV fluids and norepinephrine therapy, the patient's hypotension persisted. Approximately 17 hours after presentation, the patient was switched to dopamine, without effect, and, approximately 15 hours later, the patient was given 100 mL of 20% lipids, administered intravenously over 20 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mL/kg/hour for the next 8 hours. During this time period, the patient's blood pressure improved and dopamine therapy was gradually discontinued (Franxman et al, 2011).
    4) ANIMAL DATA
    a) In a dog model of severe verapamil poisoning, dogs treated with 7 mg/kg 20% intravenous fat emulsion (after atropine and three doses of calcium chloride) had improved mean arterial pressure and 120 minute survival (100% vs 14%) compared with dogs treated with the same doses of atropine and calcium chloride, and 7 mg/kg 0.9% saline (Bania et al, 2007).
    b) In a rat model of lethal verapamil overdose, intralipid treatment prolonged survival (44 +/-21 vs 24 +/- 9 minutes; p=0.003) and doubled median lethal dose (25.7 mg/kg [95% CI = 24.7 to 26.7] vs 13.6 mg/kg [95% CI = 12.2 to 15]). In addition, during verapamil infusion, a less marked decrease in heart rate was noted in the Intralipid-treated group (6.8 bpm [95% CI=8.3 to 5.2] for intralipid vs 10.7 bpm [95% CI = 12.6 to 8.9] for saline; p=0.001) (Tebbutt et al, 2006).
    E) BRADYCARDIA
    1) INDICATIONS: Calcium is used to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is noncompetitive (DeRoos, 2011; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993), but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    2) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985); however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011).
    3) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994). Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration.
    4) HYPERCALCEMIA: Some degree of hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves with in 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    5) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    6) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    7) CASE REPORT/HIGH DOSE ADMINISTRATION: A 40-year-old woman, with chronic renal insufficiency, developed hypotension and bradycardia after ingesting 30 mg of amlodipine. The patient's blood pressure and heart rate normalized following high-dose intravenous administration of calcium chloride, consisting of 4 grams given in the ED followed by 1.5 grams every 20 minutes (for a total of 13 grams given over 2 hours) (Hung & Olson, 2007).
    8) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Calcium chloride can cause tissue injury following extravasation; administer calcium chloride via central venous access. Hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia may also occur following repeat dosing or continuous infusion; monitor serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Nausea, vomiting, flushing, constipation, confusion, and angina have also been reported in patients receiving calcium (DeRoos, 2011).
    9) ATROPINE
    a) INDICATION: Bradydysrhythmia contributing to hypotension. May be more effective after calcium administration (Howarth et al, 1994).
    b) ATROPINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    a) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) Up to 2 mg has been administered without effect (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    d) PRECAUTIONS: Atropine primarily blocks vagal effects at the SA node while calcium antagonists affect AV conduction; marked improvements in rate may not be seen.
    10) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate in calcium antagonist intoxication.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    11) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) INDICATION: Predominant beta-1 effects stimulate discharge rate at SA node, increase heart rate, and improve contractility (Krenzelok, 1991).
    b) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    12) PACEMAKER
    a) INDICATION: Consider using a pacemaker device in severely symptomatic patients (Liang et al, 2011; Rodgers et al, 1989; Quezado et al, 1991; MacDonald & Alguire, 1992).
    13) INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP
    a) CASE REPORT: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was required in addition to pacing in a 17-year-old girl who had taken an unknown quantity of acebutolol 400 mg capsules in addition to 480 mg sustained-release verapamil (Welch et al, 1992). Other successful applications have been reported (Melanson et al, 1993; Williamson & Dunham, 1996).
    14) CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
    a) Cardiopulmonary bypass has been reported following several verapamil overdoses, its use has not been described following an amlodipine exposure.
    b) CASE REPORT: Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in a 25-month-old child after verapamil overdose. Serum verapamil concentrations fell during the procedure, allowing successful pacing, but rose again after discontinuation of the procedure, and he subsequently died (Hendren et al, 1989).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man ingested 4800 to 6400 mg of verapamil in a suicide attempt and developed cardiac arrest. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass was required 2.5 hours after cardiac arrest. Complete recovery was reported 6 months after exposure (Holzer et al, 1999).
    F) EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION
    1) AMLODIPINE/CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with a history of depression and alcohol abuse intentionally ingested 500 mg of amlodipine, 1000 mg of lisinopril and 625 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. He was initially stable with well tolerated tachycardia. He deteriorated a short time later (blood pressure nadir of 50/34 mm Hg) and became obtunded. Therapies included intubation, IV fluids, inotropic support (norepinephrine, dopamine), calcium, and glucagon. Hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia therapy was added. Despite these therapies, his central venous pressure reading was 22 mm Hg and he remained in shock. Additional therapies included phenylephrine, vasopressin and epinephrine; infusions were titrated to maximum rates with no clinical improvement. Respiratory failure secondary to severe hypoxemia, as well as laboratory evidence of hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia and renal failure also developed. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy was started because of the patient's ongoing shock and hypotension (range, 69/39 to 92/31 mm Hg). The flow rate was 5.6 L/min, the sweep gas flow rate was 3 L/min and the fraction of delivered oxygen was 1.0. ECMO was continued for 8 days while various therapies were gradually weaned. By day 17, he was successfully extubated with no supplemental oxygen needed. His hospital course was further complicated by renal failure (requiring temporary continuous venovenous hemodialysis), bacteremia, and the development of a pleural effusion. The patient was discharged to home on day 56 with no permanent sequelae (Weinberg et al, 2014).
    2) AMLODIPINE/CASE REPORT: A 13-year-old girl, weighing 61 kg, intentionally ingested 30 tablets of amlodipine (10 mg), 6 bottles of beer and an unknown amount of barbiturates and was admitted 6 hours postingestion. Initial therapies included IV fluids (boluses of normal saline), norepinephrine (0.1 mcg/kg/min), and calcium chloride (2 g) with little response. About 3 hours after presentation, a decrease in mental status was noted along with metabolic and lactic acidosis. Additional therapies included an epinephrine (0.1 mcg/kg/min) and insulin (0.1 Unit/kg/hour) and dextrose (D12.5 at 100 cc/hr) infusions. Approximately 15 hours postingestion, elective veno-arterial extracorporeal life support was started for ongoing refractory hypotension and evidence of end-organ perfusion. Therapy was started slowly and maintained at flow rate of 70 cc/kg/min for a total of 57 hours. Clinical improvement was noted within 24 hours. Inotropes were gradually weaned. She made a complete recovery (Persad et al, 2012).
    3) DILTIAZEM/CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old girl experienced multiple asystolic cardiac arrests with atrial standstill, refractory to therapy with high-dose epinephrine and transcutaneous cardiac pacing, after intentionally ingesting 12 grams of sustained-release diltiazem tablets. The patient's hemodynamic status significantly improved, with a return of brainstem reflexes, following a 48-hour period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Durward et al, 2003).
    4) NIFEDIPINE/CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old man presented to the ED with decreased level of consciousness, dyspnea, hypoxemia (O2 sat 91%), and hypotension (80/40 mmHg) approximately 2 hours after intentionally ingesting 10 g atenolol and an unknown amount of nifedipine, lacidipine, fluoxetine, and sertraline. An ECG indicated prolonged QT interval and QRS widening. The patient rapidly deteriorated hemodynamically, developed cardiac arrest (successfully resuscitated), and persistent metabolic acidosis and shock with multiple organ failure despite aggressive decontamination and supportive therapies. ECMO was initiated 2 hours post-admission along with high-volume continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (HV-CVVH). Over the next 48 hours, the patient became hemodynamically stable and was weaned from ECMO; however, the patient's clinical course was complicated by the development of progressive neurologic impairment, resulting in a persistent reduction in motor skills, impaired coordination, gait ataxia, and mild aphasia (Rona et al, 2011).
    G) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    H) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    8) PARTIAL LIQUID VENTILATION
    a) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man, who ingested approximately 24 grams of sustained-release verapamil and subsequently developed hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation, was enrolled in a phase II clinical trial and was given partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with Perflubron(R), a fluorocarbon, administered intratracheally every 2 hours for 4 days. The patient's pulmonary function significantly improved within hours of PLV administration (Szekely et al, 1999).
    1) Theoretically, the dense fluorocarbon improves ventilation: perfusion by redistribution of blood to the anterior portions of the lungs, eases pulmonary toilet (aids in the removal of exudate), and reduces potential further lung injury secondary to lower ventilator settings.
    I) BEZOAR
    1) LACK OF EFFECT: Amlodipine is not available in a sustained release formulation. There have been no reports of bezoars and/or concretions associated with amlodipine therapy or acute exposure.
    J) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) 4-AMINOPYRIDINE
    a) SUMMARY: Preliminary investigation suggests that 4-aminopyridine (a potassium channel inhibitor) may antagonize the effects of calcium channel blockers by facilitating inward calcium movement (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    1) Additional clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of 4-aminopyridine for treatment of calcium antagonist overdose.
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) AMLODIPINE/LORAZEPAM: A 47-year-old woman intentionally ingested 20 1-mg tablets of lorazepam and 40 5-mg tablets of amlodipine and presented to the emergency department 7 hours later with a blood pressure of 124/65 mmHg and a heart rate of 75 bpm. Despite activated charcoal administration, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate continued to decrease to 90/38 mmHg and 58 bpm, respectively. Following intravenous administration of 4-aminopyridine at a dosage regimen of 50 mcg/kg/hour over a 3-hour period, her blood pressure increased to 110/50 mmHg and her heart rate increased to 68 bpm (Wilffert et al, 2007).
    b) VERAPAMIL: Equivocal benefits were reported following 10 mg of 4-aminopyridine in a 67-year-old man poisoned with verapamil (ter Wee et al, 1985).
    3) ANIMAL DATA
    a) The effectiveness of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and Bay K 8644 (calcium channel activator) were evaluated in verapamil-poisoned Wistar rats. Both agents were able to increase survival time with 70% of the animals surviving in the 4-AP-treated group and 50% surviving in the Bay K 8644-treated group. Average survival in the control groups was 20% for the calcium group and 40% for the adrenaline group, respectively.
    b) MECHANISM: 4-AP has an indirect effect on calcium channels and is able to block potassium K(1) channels on the cytoplasm side leading to depolarization and opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels resulting in improved blood pressure and heart rate. Bay K 644 evokes the release of calcium from endoplasmic reticulum and activation of the calcium ion influx to improve the contraction of the vascular smooth muscle and myocardium and electrical conduction in the heart.
    c) The authors concluded that despite its dose-dependent epileptogenic action (easily controlled in this study with antiepileptic therapy), 4-AP was the most effective therapy (Magdalan, 2003).
    d) 4-Aminopyridine reversed verapamil toxicity in artificially ventilated cats (Agoston et al, 1984).
    2) LEVOSIMENDAN
    a) CASE REPORTS: Two patients who overdosed on calcium antagonists and developed cardiovascular collapse, unresponsive to conventional therapies, improved and then recovered without sequelae following levosimendan infusions (Varpula et al, 2009).
    1) The first patient, a 47-year-old woman, became severely hypotensive and developed asystole, that required ventricular pacing, after ingesting 16 g of verapamil. Despite calcium, glucagon, epinephrine boluses, norepinephrine, continuous vasopressin infusion, insulin and glucose infusion, intra aortic balloon pump, her mean arterial pressure (MAP) could not be maintained above 50 mmHg. Levosimendan was then initiated at an initial loading dose of 2 mcg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.2 mcg/kg/hour that was continued for 30 hours. Within 2 hours of initiating levosimendan, MAP could be maintained at 60 mmHg without epinephrine boluses, and she eventually recovered with normal neurologic function.
    2) The second patient, a 38-year-old man, became comatose and acidotic, with an unmeasurable mean arterial pressure (MAP), after ingesting 630 mg amlodipine, 300 mg of zopiclone, and an unknown amount of citalopram and acetaminophen. Despite conventional treatment with glucagon, calcium, vasopressors, and insulin and glucose, the patient's condition deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, worsening acidosis, right ventricular dilation, and a left ventricle ejection fraction (LEVF) of 38%. Levosimendan was then initiated at an infusion rate of 0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Ninety minutes after initiation of therapy, the patient's LVEF improved to 72%. The patient gradually recovered and was discharged approximately 11 days postingestion.
    b) ANIMAL DATA: The efficacy of levosimendan, an inotropic agent, on cardiac output, blood pressure, and heart rate was assessed in rats following intoxication with verapamil, infused at 6 mg/kg/hr until mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 50% of baseline, then the infusion was reduced to 4 mg/kg/hr. There were 5 treatment groups evaluated: normal saline infusion (control), calcium chloride as a loading dose and infusion, levosimendan 24 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.6 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-24), levosimendan 6 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-6), and levosimendan 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion with calcium chloride loading dose and infusion (Levo + CaCl2). The results showed that although the Levo-6 and Levo-24 groups showed statistically significant improvement in blood pressure compared to the control group (p <0.05) from t=20 minutes, the rats continued to be hypotensive with no improvement in blood pressure from that observed at t=0 minutes (peak verapamil toxicity prior to treatment administration). Cardiac output was significantly higher in all treatment groups as compared with the control group from t=20 minutes, except for Levo-6, which showed a significant improvement from t=30 minutes, and heart rate was maintained at pre-toxicity levels in all treatment groups. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that further investigation is warranted in order to consider levosimendan as an effective agent for the treatment of verapamil poisoning (Graudins et al, 2008).
    3) METHYLENE BLUE
    a) AMLODIPINE/CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old woman intentionally ingested 40 tablets of amlodipine (10 mg) and presented to the ED an hour later. Initial vital signs, laboratory studies and mental status were normal. An oral dose of activated charcoal was given. She became hypotensive (75/40 mm Hg) and tachycardic (120 beats/min) about 2 to 3 hours postingestion. Therapies included IV fluids (3 L of normal saline), 10% calcium gluconate (40 mL) and glucagon (10 mg) with no clinical improvement. Inotropes (dopamine, norepinephrine) were added. Following consultation with a poison center, high dose insulin-euglycemia therapy (HIE) (1 Unit/kg bolus followed by 0.5 to 1 Unit/kg/hour; later changed to 2 Units/kg/hour) and another 30 mL of 10% calcium gluconate were administered. HIE therapy was administered for 8 hours without hypoglycemia, but confusion and lethargy developed and the patient was intubated to protect her airway. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed a high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and low systemic vascular resistance. About 16 hours postingestion she was started on methylene blue at 2 mg/kg for 20 minutes followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/hour for refractory hypotension. Within an hour, her blood pressure was 90/75 mm Hg and heart rate decreased to 90 beats/min. Inotropes, HIE and methylene blue therapies were gradually weaned and the patient was discharged to home completely recovered about a week later (Jang et al, 2013).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Amlodipine is highly protein bound (93%) (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013). It is unlikely that hemodialysis would be beneficial following exposure.
    2) Case reports with other calcium channel blockers have shown very limited evidence that hemoperfusion (lowered blood concentration but the patient died), albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS) or plasmapheresis may be effective. Both of these methods can remove protein bound drugs, but definitive evidence is lacking that clinical improvement will occur.
    B) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) In general, the large volumes of distribution and high protein binding of all calcium channel blocking agents would suggest hemodialysis or hemoperfusion would have limited usefulness in removal of significant quantities of these drugs.
    2) VERAPAMIL: Five hours of combined hemodialysis and charcoal hemoperfusion was associated with a decline in verapamil concentration from 687 to 192 ng/mL in a 48-year-old with occult liver disease and anuric acute renal failure. However, hypotension and acidosis did not resolve and the patient died 8 hours after the completion of dialysis and hemoperfusion (Rosansky, 1991).
    C) PLASMAPHERESIS
    1) CASE REPORTS/VERAPAMIL: Two patients developed severe hypotension and bradycardia requiring resuscitation and transvenous pacing after ingesting 2.4 and 9.6 g of verapamil, respectively. Initial blood concentrations were 5180 and 1856 ng/mL, respectively. Plasmapheresis was begun within 4 hours of ingestion. In both cases, blood concentrations decreased markedly (from 5180 ng/mL to 1272 ng/mL after 4 hours in the first patient and from 1856 ng/mL to 485 ng/mL after 7 hours in the second patient). In the first patient, cardiovascular improvement was noted during therapy, however, the patient died 38 hours after exposure of multiorgan failure; verapamil blood concentration was below 500 ng/mL. The second patient survived with no permanent sequelae (Kuhlmann et al, 1999).
    D) ALBUMIN DIALYSIS
    1) DILTIAZEM OR VERAPAMIL: Albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy was performed on 3 patients (a 55-year-old woman, a 13-year-old girl, and a 43-year-old man) who developed refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after ingesting 8.4 g sustained-release diltiazem, 4.2 g sustained-release diltiazem, and 14.4 g slow-release verapamil, respectively. Serum diltiazem concentrations in the 55-year-old and the 13-year-old were 2,658 mcg/L and 8,580 mcg/L, respectively, and the serum verapamil concentration was 2,200 mcg/L. Following dialysis, serum calcium antagonist concentrations decreased significantly in all 3 patients, with full recovery of myocardial function and normalization of renal function (Pichon et al, 2011).

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) AMLODIPINE: A 63-year-old woman developed profound hypotension, bradycardia and dysrhythmias (junctional escape rhythm, ventricular tachycardia) after ingesting 70 mg of amlodipine and an unknown amount of oxazepam. She died 26 hours after ingestion despite aggressive supportive care (Koch et al, 1995).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: A toxic dose has not been established. Patients with the following inadvertent single substance ingestions are considered to have the potential to develop toxicity and should be referred to a healthcare facility: AMLODIPINE: ADULT: Greater than 10 mg; CHILD: Greater than 0.3 mg/kg. ADULT: A 63-year-old woman died after ingesting 70 mg amlodipine and an unknown quantity of oxazepam. The lowest reported fatal dose in an adult was 100 mg of amlodipine alone. ADOLESCENT: A 15-year-old previously healthy girl died after ingesting 140 mg of amlodipine and 10 mefenamic acid capsules. SURVIVAL: A woman survived a 1000 mg amlodipine (alone) ingestion.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: 2.5 to 10 mg once daily; maximum dose 10 mg daily. CHILD: AGES 6 TO 17 YEARS: 2.5 to 5 mg once daily for hypertension; doses higher than 5 mg daily have not been studied.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) AMLODIPINE
    1) The range is 2.5 to 10 mg once daily; the dose should be titrated as needed. The maximum dose is 10 mg daily (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, 2007).
    B) PERINDOPRIL ARGININE/AMLODIPINE
    1) INITIAL DOSE: Perindopril arginine 3.5 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg orally once daily. Dose may be increased as needed every 7 to 14 days. MAX DOSE: Perindopril arginine 14 mg/amlodipine 10 mg once daily (Prod Info PRESTALIA(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) AMLODIPINE
    1) CHILDREN AGES 6 TO 17 YEARS: The effective antihypertensive dose is 2.5 to 5 mg once daily. Doses in excess of 5 mg have not been studied in children (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, 2007).
    B) PERINDOPRIL ARGININE/AMLODIPINE
    1) Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info PRESTALIA(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman died after ingesting 70 mg amlodipine and an unknown quantity of oxazepam (Koch et al, 1995). The lowest reported fatal dose in an adult was 100 mg of amlodipine alone (Smith et al, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman developed hypotension, oliguria, and respiratory failure after ingesting 27 tablets of 5 mg amlodipine (total 135 mg). She was treated with intravenous lipid emulsion. Based on a written lipid emulsion therapy protocol, a maximum of 387.5 mL of intralipid for a 50 kg patient was ordered and treatment was started 12.5 hours after presentation. However, she inadvertently received a total of 2000 mL of 20% intralipid which ran for 4.5 hours (greater than 5 times the maximum suggested dose). There were no obvious clinical effects from the intravenous lipid overdose aside from lipemic serum. Because of severe lipemia, no metabolic panel and CBC analysis could be obtained. On hospital day 2, the treatment team felt that recovery from the amlodipine overdose was unlikely. After her family decided to withdraw care, she died within the next 24 hours (West et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old previously healthy girl died following an ingestion of 140 mg amlodipine and 10 mefenamic acid capsules (Cosbey & Carson, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORT: An 11-month-old child presented to the ED tachycardic (133 bpm), hypotensive (67/42 mmHg), lethargic and cyanotic approximately 90 minutes after ingesting up to 9 amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg capsules. Shortly after admission, the patient became progressively bradycardic and developed asystole an hour after arrival. Despite intensive resuscitative measures, the patient remained unresponsive and died 2 hours after admission. Amlodipine ingestion was confirmed with a postmortem amlodipine heart blood concentration of 1,300 ng/mL (Spiller et al, 2012).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Patients with an inadvertent single substance ingestion of amlodipine are considered to have the potential to develop toxicity and should be referred to a healthcare facility: ADULT: Greater than 10 mg; CHILD: Greater than 0.3 mg/kg (Olson et al, 2005). The lowest reported oral dose to produce toxicity in an adult is 30 mg (Olson et al, 2005)
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) SUMMARY: Survival is reported for doses ranging from 105 mg (blood pressure to 90/50 mmHg) to 250 mg (asymptomatic) (Prod Info NORVASC(R) tablets, 2005; Stanek et al, 1997). A 40 year-old healthy woman survived an ingestion of 1000 mg of amlodipine alone (Harris, 2006)
    b) CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old man developed hypotension, sinus tachycardia, and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema after intentionally ingesting 40 10-mg tablets of amlodipine. The patient recovered with supportive care and administration of calcium gluconate (Saravu & Balasubramanian, 2004).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man developed hypotension after ingesting 560 mg of amlodipine. He was treated with calcium, glucagon, norepinephrine, epinephrine and metaraminol and survived (Wood et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman developed severe hypotension, refractory to therapy with IV fluids, calcium gluconate, and epinephrine, after intentionally ingesting 420 mg of amlodipine. Following insulin and dextrose administration, the patient's blood pressure normalized and the patient was transferred for psychiatric treatment approximately 3 days postingestion (Azendour et al, 2010).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman intentionally ingested a "handful" of her amlodipine and losartan and based on the empty packets, the estimated doses were 770 mg of amlodipine and 16640 mg of losartan. Significant hypotension developed shortly after admission. Therapies included inotropes, metaraminol (a single bolus dose) and 10% calcium gluconate. Additional agents were added and included the following: vasopressin, glucagon, hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia therapy and a 20% intralipid infusion. Hypoxia, pulmonary edema and acute renal injury also developed. Hypotension remained refractory and a metaraminol infusion was begun with immediate sustained improvement in blood pressure. She was discharged about a week after hospitalization with no permanent sequelae (Plumb et al, 2011).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman, with a history of alcohol abuse, intentionally ingested 70 tablets of amlodipine 5 mg and an unknown amount of ethanol. She developed hypotension, shock, and metabolic acidosis. Therapies included multiple vasopressors (norepinephrine, vasopressin, and phenylephrine), calcium, glucagon and IV fluid boluses. A 20% lipid infusion was successful in correcting hypotension and the patient gradually improved (Meaney et al, 2013).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) CASE SERIES: According to case reviews of pediatric amlodipine-only ingestions, using National Poison Data System (NPDS) data from 2000 to 2003 (n=1251), the lowest reported ingestion to produce a clinically important response in children less than 6 years of age was 2.5 mg. Within this retrospective analysis, a clinically important response was defined as hypotension, bradycardia, other dysrhythmia (ie, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes), or hyperglycemia. Therefore, it is recommended that children less than 6 years of age who ingest 2.5 mg or more of amlodipine should be referred to a healthcare facility for evaluation (Benson et al, 2010).
    b) CASE REPORTS: In a literature review by Ranniger and Roche (2007) there were 3 children ages 0 to 6 years who ingested amlodipine, the only recorded toxic dose of amlodipine was 0.4 mg/kg (Ranniger & Roche, 2007).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 19-month-old child ingested 30 mg (2 mg/kg). Blood pressure remained stable although heart rate was 180 beats/min. Recovery within 24 hours followed supportive care and observation (Prod Info NORVASC(R) tablets, 2005).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) Therapeutic serum levels for amlodipine are 10 to 15 nanograms/mL (Koch et al, 1995).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) SURVIVAL
    a) CASE REPORT: The serum amlodipine concentration of a 25-year-old woman, who ingested 40 10-mg amlodipine tablets approximately 1 hour prior to emergency department presentation, was 36 mcg/mL (therapeutic range, 3 to 10 mcg/mL). The patient developed shock refractory to conventional supportive therapies, but recovered without sequelae following administration of methylene blue (Jang et al, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: The serum amlodipine concentration following ingestion of 425 mg of amlodipine in a 22-year-old woman was 150 ng/mL (Ezidiegwu et al, 2008).
    2) FATALITIES
    a) CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman died after ingesting 70 mg amlodipine and an unknown quantity of oxazepam. Peak serum amlodipine level 10.5 hours after ingestion was 185 ng/mL (Koch et al, 1995).
    b) CASE REPORT: Amlodipine concentration was 2.7 mg/L in peripheral blood of a fatality involving ingestion of 140 mg by a 15-year-old girl (Cosbey & Carson, 1997).
    c) CASE REPORTS: Analysis of 58 postmortem femoral blood samples obtained between 2003 and 2010 revealed 5 cases with supratherapeutic amlodipine levels, which may have contributed to death. One of the 5 cases was classified as Category A, defined as the drug concentration where the drug was considered the sole cause of death. Concentrations were 0.94 mg/kg in the Category A case; 0.44 mg/kg in a patient who had leukemia; 0.29 and 0.41 mg/kg coingested with diltiazem (21 mg/kg) and mirtazapine (5.4 mg/kg), respectively; and 0.17 mg/kg in the presence of fluconazole (qualitative) in a 77 year-old-woman who suffocated. In vivo therapeutic serum levels in 7 control cases ranged between 0.001 to 0.024 mg/mL (Linnet et al, 2011).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) SUMMARY: Amlodipine besylate is a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that exerts its effect by blocking the transmembrane influx of calcium ions into cardiac and vascular smooth muscles. It also reduces peripheral vascular resistance and lowers blood pressure by causing a direct vasodilation in the peripheral arteries of the vascular smooth muscle. Its therapeutic effect on angina may be through a decrease in peripheral resistance (exertional angina) and inhibition of coronary spasm (vasospastic angina) (Prod Info NORVASC(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) CARDIOVASCULAR
    1) Calcium antagonists selectively inhibit membrane transport of calcium during the slow inward excitation-contraction coupling phase in smooth muscle leading to coronary and peripheral vasodilation. In general, they have a negative inotropic (contractility) effect on the myocardium (Singh et al, 1978) not usually manifested with therapeutic doses due to compensation of the sympathetic nervous system.

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS
    1) Cardiovascular effects that occur in overdose, as related to the specific class of calcium channel blockers, are as follows (Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007):
    a) Vasodilation - Dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine) > phenylalkalamines (e.g., verapamil) > benzothiazepines (e.g., diltiazem)
    b) Chronotropic suppression (SA node) - Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    c) Suppression of conduction (AV node) - Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    d) Inotropy (contractility) - Phenylalkalamines >>benzothiazepines>dihydropyridines
    B) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) Calcium channel antagonists, in general, decrease pancreatic insulin secretion and induce systemic insulin resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004). An in vitro study showed that dysregulation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, an insulin-dependent pathway, may contribute to the development of insulin resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia in the setting of calcium channel antagonist toxicity (Bechtel et al, 2008).
    2) It has been demonstrated in humans that insulin response to glucose is acutely inhibited by infusion of verapamil, apparently a result of interference with calcium entry into the pancreatic islets beta cell (De Marinis & Barbarino, 1980). The same inhibitory effect demonstrated in rats was greater at subnormal calcium levels and lesser at high calcium levels (Devis et al, 1975)
    C) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
    1) Decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance, and poor tissue perfusion and substrate delivery may be related to the occurrence of metabolic acidosis associated with calcium channel blocker (CCB) poisoning (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004). Another contributing factor may be the CCBs interference with glucose catabolism via inhibition of calcium-stimulated mitochondrial activity, thereby leading to lactate production and ATP hydrolysis.
    D) PSYCHOSIS
    1) Excessive dopaminergic influences may be responsible since calcium antagonism leads to stimulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in dopaminergic neurons (Kahn, 1986); however, confusion and disorientation due to hypoperfusion may be mistaken for psychosis.

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Adams BD & Browne WT: Amlodipine overdose causes prolonged calcium channel blocker toxicity. Amer J Emerg Med 1998; 16:527-528.
    3) Agarwal A, Yu SW, Rehman A, et al: Hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker overdose: a case report. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39(4):575-578.
    4) Agoston S, Maestrone E, & van Hezik EJ: Effective treatment of verapamil intoxication with 4-aminopyridine in the cat. J Clin Invest 1984; 73:1291-1296.
    5) Ahn HK, Nava-Ocampo AA, Han JY, et al: Exposure to amlodipine in the first trimester of pregnancy and during breastfeeding. Hypertens Pregnancy 2007; 26(2):179-187.
    6) American College of Medical Toxicology : ACMT Position Statement: Interim Guidance for the Use of Lipid Resuscitation Therapy. J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(1):81-82.
    7) American College of Medical Toxicology: ACMT position statement: guidance for the use of intravenous lipid emulsion. J Med Toxicol 2016; Epub:Epub-.
    8) Anthony T, Jastremski M, & Elliot W: Charcoal hemoperfusion for the treatment of a combined diltiazem and metoprolol overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1344-1348.
    9) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    10) Azendour H , Belyamani L , Atmani M , et al: Severe amlodipine intoxication treated by hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy. J Emerg Med 2010; 38(1):33-35.
    11) Bania TC, Chu J, Perez E, et al: Hemodynamic effects of intravenous fat emulsion in an animal model of severe verapamil toxicity resuscitated with atropine, calcium, and saline. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14(2):105-111.
    12) Barry JD, Durkovich D, Cantrell L, et al: Vasopressin treatment of verapamil toxicity in the porcine model. J Med Toxicol 2005; 1(1):3-10.
    13) Bechtel LK, Haverstick DM, & Holstege CP: Verapamil toxicity dysregulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15(4):368-374.
    14) Benson BE, Spyker DA, Troutman WG, et al: Amlodipine toxicity in children less than 6 years of age: a dose-response analysis using national poison data system data. J Emerg Med 2010; 39(2):186-193.
    15) Boyer EW, Duic PA, & Evans A: Hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker poisoning. Ped Emerg Care 2002; 18:36-37.
    16) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    17) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    18) Buckley N, Dawson AH, & Howarth D: Slow-release verapamil poisoning: use of polyethylene glycol whole-bowel lavage and high-dose calcium. Med J Aust 1993; 158:202-204.
    19) Buckley NA, Whyte IM, & Dawson AH: Overdose with calcium channel blockers (letter). Br Med J 1994; 308:1639.
    20) Cantrell FL, Clark RF, & Manoguerra AS: Determining triage guidelines for unintentional overdoses with calcium channel antagonists. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):849-853.
    21) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    22) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    23) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    24) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    25) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    26) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    27) Clark RF & Hanna TC: Calcium channel blocker toxicity. Top Emerg Med 1993; 15:15-26.
    28) Cosbey SH & Carson DJL: A fatal case of amlodipine poisoning. J Analytical Toxicol 1997; 21:221-222.
    29) De Marinis L & Barbarino A: Calcium antagonists and hormone release. I. Effects of verapamil on insulin release in normal subjects and patients with islet-cell tumor. Metabolism 1980; 29:599-604.
    30) DeRoos FJ: Calcium Channel Blockers. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicological Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    31) DeWitt CR & Waksman JC: Pharmacology, pathophysiology and management of calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker toxicity. Toxicol Rev 2004; 23:223-238.
    32) Devasahayam J , Pillai U , & Uppaluri C : Acute severe intestinal obstruction secondary to amlodipine toxicity. Qjm 2012; 105(5):467-469.
    33) Devis G, Somers G, & Van Obberghen E: Calcium antagonists and islet function I. Inhibition of insulin release by verapamil. Diabetes 1975; 24:247-251.
    34) Doyon S & Roberts JR: The use of glucagon in a case of calcium channel blocker overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1229-1233.
    35) Durward A, Guerguerian AM, Lefebvre M, et al: Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care 2003; 4(3):372-376.
    36) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    37) Engebretsen KM, Kaczmarek KM, Morgan J, et al: High-dose insulin therapy in beta-blocker and calcium channel-blocker poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011; 49(4):277-283.
    38) Erickson FC, Ling LJ, & Grande GA: Diltiazem overdose: case report and review. J Emerg Med 1991; 9:357-366.
    39) Evans JSM & Oram MP: Neurological recovery after prolonged verapamil-induced cardiac arrest. Anaes Intens Care 1999; 27:653-655.
    40) Ezidiegwu C, Spektor Z, Nasr MR, et al: A case report on the role of plasma exchange in the management of a massive amlodipine besylate intoxication. Ther Apher Dial 2008; 12(2):180-184.
    41) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    42) Franxman TJ, Al-Nabhan M, Cavallazzi RS, et al: Lipid emulsion therapy for verapamil overdose. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154(4):292.
    43) Ghosh S & Sircar M: Calcium channel blocker overdose: Experience with amlodipine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2008; 12(4):190-193.
    44) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    45) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    46) Graudins A, Najafi J, & Rur-SC MP: Treatment of experimental verapamil poisoning with levosimendan utilizing a rodent model of drug toxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(1):50-56.
    47) Greene SL, Gawarammana I, Wood DM, et al: Relative safety of hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of calcium channel blocker overdose: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33(11):2019-2024.
    48) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    49) Hantsch C, Seger D, & Meredith T: Calcium channel antagonist toxicity and hypercalcemia (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:495-496.
    50) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    51) Harris NS: Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 24-2006. A 40-year-old woman with hypotension after an overdose of amlodipine. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(6):602-611.
    52) Hasson R, Mulcahy V, & Tahir H: Amlodipine poisioning complicated with acute non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011:1.
    53) Haynes RC, Murad F, & Gilman AG: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Macmillan Publishing Co, New York, NY, 1985, pp 1521.
    54) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    55) Henderson A, Stevenson N, & Hackett LP: Diltiazem overdose in an elderly patient: efficacy of adrenaline. Anesth Intens Care 1992; 20:507-510.
    56) Hendren WG, Schieber RS, & Garrettson LK: Extracorporeal bypass for the treatment of verapamil poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:984-987.
    57) Hofer CA, Smith JK, & Tenholder MF: Verapamil intoxication: a literature review of overdoses and discussion of therapeutic options. Am J Med 1993; 95:431-438.
    58) Holzer M, Sterz F, & Schoerkhuber W: Successful resuscitation of a verapamil-intoxicated patient with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2818-2823.
    59) Howarth DM, Dawson AH, & Smith AJ: Calcium channel blocking drug overdose: am Australian series. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:161-166.
    60) Hung YM & Olson KR: Acute amlodipine overdose treated by high dose intravenous calcium in a patient with severe renal insufficiency. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(3):301-303.
    61) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    62) Jaeger A, Sauder P, & Kopferschmitt J: Diltiazem acute poisoning: hemodynamic and kinetic study (abstract 191). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    63) Jang DH, Nelson LS, & Hoffman RS: Methylene Blue for Distributive Shock: A Potential New Use of an Old Antidote. J Med Toxicol 2013; Epub:Epub.
    64) Jang DH, Nelson LS, & Hoffman RS: Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Refractory Shock From an Amlodipine Overdose. Ann Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub-.
    65) Kahn JK: Nifedipine-associated acute psychosis. Am J Med 1986; 81:705-706.
    66) Kamijo Y, Yoshida T, Ide A, et al: Mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring in calcium channel blocker poisoning: tissue hypoxia avoidance despite hypotension. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24(3):357-360.
    67) Kanagarajan K, Marraffa JM, Bouchard NC, et al: The use of vasopressin in the setting of recalcitrant hypotension due to calcium channel blocker overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(1):56-59.
    68) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    69) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    70) Koch AR, Vogelaers DP, & Decruyenaere JM: Fatal intoxication with amlodipine. Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:253-256.
    71) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    72) Krenzelok EP: Acute calcium channel blocker overdosage. Clin Tox Forum 1991; 3:1-6.
    73) Kuhlmann U, Schoenemann H, Muller TF, et al: Plasmapheresis in fatal overdose with verapamil. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25(12):1473-1473.
    74) Lafuente NG & Egea AM: Calcium channel blockers and hepatotoxicity (letter). AJG 2000; 95:2145.
    75) Laine K, Kivisto KT, & Neuvonen PJ: Effect of delayed administration of activated charcoal on the absorption of conventional and slow-release verapamil. Clin Toxicol 1997a; 35:263-268.
    76) Laine K, Kivisto KT, & Neuvonen PJ: Effect of delayed administration of activated charcoal on the absorption of conventional and slow-release verapamil. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:263-268.
    77) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    78) Leone M, Charvet A, Delmas A, et al: Terlipressin: a new therapeutic for calcium-channel blockers overdose (letter). J Crit Care 2005; 20:114-115.
    79) Levine M, Boyer EW, Pozner CN, et al: Assessment of hyperglycemia after calcium channel blocker overdoses involving diltiazem or verapamil. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(9):2071-2075.
    80) Levine M, Curry SC, Padilla-Jones A, et al: Critical Care Management ofVerapamil and Diltiazem Overdose With a Focus on Vasopressors: A 25-Year Experience at a Single Center. Ann Emerg Med 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    81) Lheureux PE, Zahir S, Gris M, et al: Bench-to-bedside review: Hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of overdose of calcium-channel blockers. Crit Care (Lond) 2006; 10(3):212-.
    82) Liang CW, Diamond SJ, & Hagg DS: Lipid rescue of massive verapamil overdose: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2011; 5:399-399.
    83) Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, et al: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126(3):477-480.
    84) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    85) Linnet K, Lang LM, & Johansen SS: Postmortem femoral blood concentrations of amlodipine. J Anal Toxicol 2011; 35(4):227-231.
    86) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    87) Ma B, Prueksaritanont T, & Lin JH: Drug interactions with calcium channel blockers: possible involvement of metabolite-intermediate complexation with CYP3A. Drug Metab Dispos 2000; 28(2):125-130.
    88) MacDonald D & Alguire PC: Case report: fatal overdose with sustained-release verapamil. Am J Med Sci 1992; 303:115-117.
    89) Magdalan J: New treatment methods in verapamil poisoning: experimental studies. Polish J Pharmacol 2003; 55:425-432.
    90) Mahr NC, Valdes A, & Lamas G: Use of glucagon for acute intravenous diltiazem toxicity. Amer J Cardiol 1997; 79:1570-1571.
    91) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    92) Meaney CJ , Sareh H , Hayes BD , et al: Intravenous lipid emulsion in the management of amlodipine overdose. Hosp Pharm 2013; 48(10):848-854.
    93) Melanson P, Shir RD, & DeRoos F: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in calcium channel blocker overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:345.
    94) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    95) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    96) Nivoix Y, Leveque D, Herbrecht R, et al: The enzymatic basis of drug-drug interactions with systemic triazole antifungals. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47(12):779-792.
    97) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    98) Olson KR, Erdman AR, Woolf AD, et al: Calcium channel blocker ingestion: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):797-822.
    99) Paetow GM, Austad EJ, Olives TD, et al: Use of Tissue Perfusion Monitoring to Titrate High Dose Insulin in Beta Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):705-706.
    100) Papadopoulos J & O'Neil MG: Utilization of a glucagon infusion in the management of a massive nifedipine overdose. J Emerg Med 2000; 18:453-455.
    101) Pearigen PD & Benowitz NL: Poisoning due to calcium antagonists. Experience with verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. Drug Safety 1991; 6:408-430.
    102) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    103) Perez E, Chu J, Bania T, et al: L-carnitine increases survival in a murine model of severe verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18(11):1135-1140.
    104) Persad EA , Raman L , Thompson MT , et al: The use of extracorporeal life support in adolescent amlodipine overdose. Indian J Crit Care Med 2012; 16(4):204-206.
    105) Phillips BB & Muller BA: Severe neuromuscular complications possibly associated with amlodipine. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32:1165-1167.
    106) Pichon N, Dugard A, Clavel M, et al: Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Three Cases of Acute Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning With Life-Threatening Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Ann Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub.
    107) Plumb JO, Stewart C, Eddleston M, et al: Prolonged Refractory Hypotension following Combined Amlodipine and Losartan Ingestion Responsive to Metaraminol. Case Rep Med 2011; 2011:283672.
    108) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    109) Product Information: CALAN(R) SR oral sustained release caplets, verapamil HCl oral sustained release caplets. G.D. Searle (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.
    110) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    111) Product Information: NORVASC(R) oral tablets, amlodipine besylate oral tablets. Pfizer Labs (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.
    112) Product Information: NORVASC(R) oral tablets, amlodipine besylate oral tablets. Pfizer Labs (per FDA), New York, NY, 2015.
    113) Product Information: NORVASC(R) tablets, amlodipine besylate tablets. Pfizer, New York, NY, 2005.
    114) Product Information: Norvasc(R), amlodipine besylate. Pfizer Labs Division, New York, NY, 1994.
    115) Product Information: PRESTALIA(R) oral tablets, perindopril arginine amlodipine oral tablets. SYMPLMED LLC (per FDA), Cincinnati, OH, 2015.
    116) Product Information: amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets, amlodipine orally disintegrating tablets. Synthon Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2007.
    117) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    118) Product Information: dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (per DailyMed), Deerfield, IL, 2012.
    119) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    120) Product Information: inamrinone intravenous solution, inamrinone intravenous solution. Bedford Laboratories, Bedford, OH, 2002.
    121) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    122) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    123) Product Information: phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    124) Quezado Z, Lippmann M, & Wertheimer J: Severe cardiac, respiratory, and metabolic complications of massive verapamil overdose. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:436-438.
    125) Ramoska EA, Spiller HA, & Winter M: A one-year evaluation of calcium channel blocker overdoses: toxicity and treatment. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:196-200.
    126) Rankin RJ & Edwards IR: Overdose of sustained release verapamil (letter). NZ Med J 1990; 103:165.
    127) Ranniger C & Roche C: Are one or two dangerous? Calcium channel blocker exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 2007; 33(2):145-154.
    128) Rasmussen L, Husted SE, & Johnsen SP: Severe intoxication after an intentional overdose of amlodipine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:1038-1040.
    129) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    130) Rodgers GC, Al-Mahasneh QM, & White SL: Treatment of severe sustained release verapamil poisoning with cardiac pacing: a case report (abstract 190). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    131) Rona R, Cortinovis B, Marcolin R, et al: Extra-corporeal life support for near-fatal multi-drug intoxication: a case report. J Med Case Reports 2011; 5:231.
    132) Rosansky SJ: Verapamil toxicity-treatment with hemoperfusion (letter). Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:340-341.
    133) Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Addario C, et al: Successful treatment with enoximone for severe poisoning with atenolol and verapamil: a case report. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48:790-792.
    134) Saravu K & Balasubramanian R: Near-fatal amlodipine poisoning. J Assoc Phys India 2004; 52:156-157.
    135) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    136) Shepherd G & Klein-Schwartz W: High-dose insulin therapy for calcium-channel blocker overdose. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39:923-930.
    137) Singh BN, Ellrodt G, & Peter CT: Verapamil: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 1978; 15:169-197.
    138) Smith SW , Ferguson KL , Hoffman RS , et al: Prolonged severe hypotension following combined amlodipine and valsartan ingestion. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(5):470-474.
    139) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    140) Sorrentino A: Update on pediatric resuscitation drugs: high dose, low dose, or no dose at all. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17(2):223-226.
    141) Spiller HA, Milliner BA, & Bosse GM: Amlodipine fatality in an infant with postmortem blood levels. J Med Toxicol 2012; 8(2):179-182.
    142) Sporer KA & Manning JJ: Massive ingestion of sustained-release verapamil with a concretion and bowel infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:603-605.
    143) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    144) St-Onge M, Ajmo I, Poirier D, et al: L-Carnitine for the Treatment of a Calcium Channel Blocker and Metformin Poisoning. J Med Toxicol 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    145) Stanek EJ, Nelson CE, & DeNofrio D: Amlodipine overdose. Ann Pharmacotherapy 1997; 31:853-855.
    146) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    147) Szekely LA, Thompson BT, & Woolf A: Use of partial liquid ventilation to manage pulmonary complications of acute verapamil-sustained release poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:475-479.
    148) Takahashi h, Ohashi n, & Motokawa K: Poisoning caused by the combined ingestion of nifedipine and metoprolol. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:631-637.
    149) Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, & Kraus DM (Eds): Pediatric Dosage Handbook, 4th. Lexi-Comp, Inc, Cleveland, OH, 1997.
    150) Tanen DA, Ruha AM, & Curry SC: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is effective in the acute management of verapamil toxicity in a swine model. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36:547-553.
    151) Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, et al: Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13(2):134-139.
    152) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    153) Usalan C, Erdem Y, & Arici M: Severe thrombocytopenia associated with amlodipine treatment (letter). Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33:1126-1127.
    154) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    155) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    156) Varpula T, Rapola J, Sallisalmi M, et al: Treatment of serious calcium channel blocker overdose with levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(3):790-792.
    157) Verbrugge LB & vanWezel HB: Pathophysiology of verapamil overdose: new insights in the role of insulin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21(3):406-409.
    158) Watling SM, Crain JL, & Edwards TD: Verapamil overdose: case report and review of the literature. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26:1373-1377.
    159) Weinberg RL , Bouchard NC , Abrams DC , et al: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the management of massive amlodipine overdose. Perfusion 2014; 29(1):53-56.
    160) Welch CD, Knoerzer RE, & Lewis GS: Verapamil and acebutolol overdose results in asystole: intra-aortic balloon pump provides mechanical support. J Extra-Corporeal Tech 1992; 24:36-37.
    161) West PL, McKeown NJ, & Hendrickson RG: Iatrogenic lipid emulsion overdose in a case of amlodipine poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2010; 48(4):393-396.
    162) White RD, Goldsmith RS, & Rodrigues R: Plasma ionic calcium levels following injection of chloride, gluconate, and gluceptate salts of calcium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71:609-613.
    163) Wilffert B, Boskma RJ, vanderVoort PH, et al: 4-Aminopyridine (fampridine) effectively treats amlodipine poisoning: a case report. J Clin Pharm Ther 2007; 32(6):655-657.
    164) Williamson KM & Dunham GD: Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in an overdose situation. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30:608-611.
    165) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The Adult Calfactant in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) Trial. Chest 2015; Epub:Epub.
    166) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    167) Wood DM, Wright KD, Jones AL, et al: Metaraminol (Aramine(R)) in the management of a significant amlodipine overdose. Human Exp Toxicol 2005; 24:377-381.
    168) Young AC, Velez LI, & Kleinschmidt KC: Intravenous fat emulsion therapy for intentional sustained-release verapamil overdose. Resuscitation 2009; 80(5):591-593.
    169) Yuan TH, Kerns WP, & Tomaszewski CA: Insulin-glucose as adjunctive therapy for severe calcium channel antagonist poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:463-474.
    170) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    171) ter Wee PM, Kremer Hovinga TK, Uges DRA, et al: 4-Aminopyridine and haemodialysis in the treatment of verapamil intoxication. Human Toxicol 1985; 4:327-329.