MOBILE VIEW  | 

NICOTINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Nicotine is used in medicines, as an insecticide, and in tanning. This management deals with nicotine used in tobacco (ie, nicotine gum, nicotine liquid (ie hookah, electronic cigarettes), transdermal, nicotine spray) tanning or as a pesticide, but not as the plant itself.

Specific Substances

    1) Black leaf
    2) Nicotine liquid (synonym)
    3) Nicotine gum (synonym)
    4) Nicotine patch (synonym)
    5) alpha-n-methyl-d-beta-pyridyl-pyrrolidine
    6) 1-methyl-2-(3-pyridyl)pyrrolidine
    7) 3-(n-methylpyrrolidino)pyridine
    8) 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine
    9) (S)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine
    10) L-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidyl)pyridine
    11) 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidyl)pyridine
    12) (-)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidyl)pyridine
    13) (-)-Nicotine
    14) l-Nicotine
    15) L-Nicotine
    16) (S)-Nicotine
    17) Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-
    18) beta-Pyridyl-alpha-N-methylpyrrolidine
    19) beta-Pyridyl-O,N-methylpyrrolidine
    20) Pyrrolidine, 1-methyl-2-(3-PYRIDAL)-
    21) CAS 54-11-5
    22) NICOTINE SULFATE, SOLID OR LIQUID
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C10-H14-N2
    2) C20-H26-N4.O4-S

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) TOBACCO LEAVES
    a) Tobacco leaves contain about 1% to 6% nicotine and when blended to make cigarettes or cigars, contain about 1% to 2% nicotine (4(6)).
    2) SNUFF/CHEWING TOBACCO
    a) SNUFF is prepared from powdered tobacco leaf and flavorings. Moist snuff contains from 4.6 to 32 mg of nicotine per gram of moist material, and 12.4 to 15.6 mg/g of dry snuff (Hoffmann et al, 1986). Most containers hold 30 g of snuff.
    b) CHEWING TOBACCO (LEAF OR PLUG) contains about 2.5 mg nicotine per gram of dry material, although amounts as high as 8 mg/g have been reported (Gritz et al, 1981).
    1) Betelquid and Pan Masala are popular chewing products that contain tobacco and other ingredients (Babu et al, 1996). It is used primarily in India, Pakistan, and some Asian countries.
    3) CIGARETTES
    a) CIGARETTE TOBACCO contains 13 to 30 mg nicotine per 1 whole cigarette; 1 low-yield cigarette contains 3 to 8 mg nicotine; 1 cigar contains 15 to 40 mg nicotine; 1 cigarette butt contains 5 to 7 mg nicotine (Salomon , 2002).
    1) The actual nicotine "delivered" in smoke is 0.5 to 2.0 mg per 1 whole cigarette; 0.1 to 1.0 mg per 1 low-yield cigarette; 0.2 to 1.0 mg per cigar (Salomon , 2002).
    b) IMPORTED CIGARETTES
    1) BIDI are small, unfiltered, brown, hand-rolled cigarettes (they have the appearance of a marijuana cigarette) primarily produced in India and other southeast Asia countries, which consist of tobacco wrapped in a tendu or temburni leaf (Diospyros melanoxylon)((Anon, 1999)) and estimated to contain 3 times the amount of nicotine as regular cigarettes (BD Montgomery , 1999; Yen et al, 2000).
    a) Bidis come in a wide variety of flavors (eg, vanilla, strawberry, chocolate, mandarin orange, mango, rootbeer) to mask the poor quality of the tobacco and are popular among teenagers for their taste, lower cost, and the potential ease of access over the internet (BD Montgomery , 1999; Yen et al, 2000).
    b) Despite containing less tobacco, a single bidi produces 3 times as much nicotine and carbon monoxide as the standard American cigarette. Also, the tendu leaf wrapper does not burn well; therefore, a smoker has to inhale frequently and deeply, which could result in large amount of tar being deposited into the airways (Yen et al, 2000).
    c) At the time of this review, there has been an attempt by US states to have bidi cigarettes outlawed; a formal letter to the Department of Health and Human Services has been signed by all 50 states (Yen et al, 2000).
    2) KRETEK: A clove-flavored cigarette produced in Indonesia that may be referred to as "rokok kretek." . Traditionally, the cigarettes had cloves crushed and mixed in with tobacco. Today, fragrance and flavors chemicals are predominant, rather than crushed cloves in the cigarettes. Generally, they have higher nicotine levels than traditional cigarettes (Personal Communication, 2000).
    4) NICOTINE LIQUID
    a) Nicotine liquid is used with electronic-cigarettes. Refill cartridges contain liquid nicotine and are available in various strengths ranging from 6 mg/mL (0.6%) to 36 mg/mL (3.6%). It is estimated that 20 drops are equal to 1 mL of solution; 1 drop of 3.6% liquid contains 1.8 mg of nicotine. A potential ingestion of 1 to 2 drops of 3.6% solution (1.8 to 3.6 mg) could produce significant symptoms in a young child (Gupta et al, 2014). In addition, nickel contact allergy has been reported with the use of an electronic cigarette in an adult with a history of contact allergy; a dimethylglyoxime spot test was positive (Maridet et al, 2015).
    b) HOOKAH/SECONDHAND EXPOSURE TO NICOTINE: In a study of the homes of hookah-only smokers and nonsmokers, the levels of indoor air nicotine (a marker of secondhand smoke), indoor surface nicotine (a measure of third-hand smoke), and a child's uptake of nicotine and other chemicals were measured to assess exposure in children living in the homes of hookah smokers. The findings showed significantly higher nicotine levels in indoor air and on surfaces in a child's bedroom in the homes of daily hookah smokers compared to the homes of nonsmokers. Uptake of nicotine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), and acrolein were significantly higher in children living in a home with a daily hookah smoker compared to children living in a nonsmoker home (Kassem et al, 2014).
    5) NICOTINE GUM
    a) Nicorette(R) contains 2 mg of nicotine in the form of a natural tobacco plant extract in an ion-exchange resin gum base. The gum is buffered to a pH of 8.5 to enhance buccal absorption.
    6) NICOTINE TRANSDERMAL SYSTEMS
    a) Habitrol(R) contains 17.5 mg, 35 mg, or 52.5 mg and releases 7 mg, 14 mg, and 21 mg daily, respectively.
    b) Nicoderm(R) releases 7 mg, 14 mg, or 21 mg daily.
    c) Prostep(R) contains 15 mg or 30 mg and releases 10 mg and 21 mg daily, respectively.
    d) Nicotrol-16(R) contains 16.6 mg.
    7) NICOTINE NASAL SPRAY
    a) Nicotrol NS contains 10 mg/mL, and each actuation releases a metered 50 mL spray containing 0.5 mg nicotine. One spray in each nostril delivers a total of 1 mg nicotine (Prod Info Nicotrol NS(R), nicotine nasal spray, 1996).
    8) AEROSOL RODS
    a) Aerosol nicotine rods were evaluated as a substitute cigarette. Manufacturers of these rods are required to file a New Drug Application with the FDA (Slade & Connolly, 1987). Nicotine uptake by test subjects has been variable, limiting the aerosol rod's usefulness (deBethizy et al, 1988; Sepkovic et al, 1986).
    9) Nicotine is available in the following forms: dihydrochloride, salicylate, sulfate, and bitartrate (Lewis, 1993).
    10) POSSIBLE ROUTES OF EXPOSURE
    a) Exposure to nicotine occurs during:
    1) The mixing, storage, and application of insecticides.
    2) The processing and extracting of tobacco.
    3) Ingestion of cigarettes, snuff, or cigars.
    4) Ingestion of nicotine liquid used in electronic-cigarettes (ie, refill cartridges containing nicotine liquid)
    5) Administration of tobacco enemas to treat intestinal parasites.
    6) Chewing of nicotine chewing gum used to aid in smoking cessation.
    7) Contact with plants containing nicotine.
    8) Usage or ingestion of nicotine-containing transdermal patches.
    b) Little or no nicotine is now produced in the US, and limited supplies are imported from India (HSDB, 1997).
    B) USES
    1) Nicotine is used in medicines, as an insecticide and in tanning (ACGIH, 1991).
    2) Nicotine is a highly toxic alkaloid that causes stimulation of the autonomic ganglia and the central nervous system. In its free state it is a pale yellow liquid that slowly darkens on exposure to air. Nicotine is derived from the stems and leaves of the tobacco plant and its primary usage is cigarettes.
    3) Nicotine also is encountered in insecticide preparations as a crude 40% solution of the sulfate, which is applied as a spray or dust (Baselt & Cravey, 1995; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Morgan, 1993). The pharmaceutical industry manufactures formulations containing nicotine (ITI, 1995). Nicotine has been used in the tanning process (NRC, 1989).
    4) Nicotine is used in veterinary applications as an ectoparasiticide and anthelmintic (EPA, 1985).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) SOURCES: Found primarily in tobacco-containing products such as cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, and chewing tobacco and also in nicotine replacement products such as gum, nasal sprays, patches, and electronic cigarettes. Also, found in the tobacco plant (Nicotiana tabacum) and some other plant species; occupational exposures may result from the harvesting or processing of tobacco plants (SEE Plants-Nicotinic Management). Nicotine may also be found in some insecticides (used in the developing world).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Binds to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that are found throughout the body, most notably in the autonomic nervous system (preganglionic sympathetic synapses and pre- and postganglionic parasympathetic synapses).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Toxic effects are dose-related and result from overstimulation of nicotinic receptors, often causing inhibition of receptor action following initial stimulatory effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Very common exposure that can rarely result in significant morbidity and death, especially in children. May be an occupational exposure, commonly known as green tobacco sickness, from working with tobacco plants .
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: NICOTINE REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS: Symptoms may include local irritation from the gum, spray, or transdermal patch or systemic signs (eg, nausea and vomiting, sleep disturbances, headache, and chest pain) of nicotine toxicity. Absorption may occur after ingestion, inhalation, dermal, or rectal exposure.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: GI upset, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, tremor, diaphoresis, tachycardia, pallor, and hypertension are common events.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Seizures, confusion, weakness, bradycardia, hypotension, and respiratory muscle paralysis can develop.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypertension, tachycardia, and tachypnea may occur, followed by hypotension, bradycardia, and bradypnea. Respiratory stimulation is one of the principal signs of nicotine poisoning. High doses can produce fatal respiratory depression of both central and peripheral origin.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Nicotine is a possible human teratogen.
    B) Nicotine is teratogenic in mice, but not in several other species. It crosses the placenta and is excreted in breast milk. It has reduced fertility in male and female rats.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Use of smokeless tobacco has been shown to cause oral-pharyngeal cancer.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) No testing is required in patients with mild or no symptoms.
    B) Serum chemistries, creatine kinase, lactate, urinalysis should be performed in patients with severe poisonings.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in all symptomatic patients.
    D) Serum levels are not readily available or useful to guide management.
    E) Urine cotinine levels can be obtained for occupational monitoring.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is primarily supportive and symptomatic. Vomiting is common, which tends to limit absorption. Intravenous fluids can be administered. Persistent vital sign abnormalities, altered mental status, muscle weakness, and seizures indicate a more severe poisoning.
    B) SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is primarily symptomatic and supportive. Patients may need airway support and mechanical ventilation for altered mental status, respiratory distress, secretions or respiratory paralysis. Atropine can be given for bradycardia or significant muscarinic signs (ie, bronchorrhea), if present. Hypotension should be treated with intravenous fluids and then a vasopressor as needed. Benzodiazepines should be used to treat seizures or severe agitation. Death is primarily from respiratory failure.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Prehospital decontamination is unlikely to be of benefit as nicotine is rapidly absorbed and most patients with more than mild toxicity will have significant vomiting. Remove transdermal patches and wash skin.
    2) HOSPITAL: Any transdermal patches should be removed from the skin and the area should be flushed with water, and wash exposed skin. Gastric decontamination is usually not necessary because patients often present with large amounts of vomiting. If the patient is not already vomiting, consider using activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation following ingestion of a patch product in a child or ingestion of multiple patches by an adult.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with an altered mental status or respiratory muscle weakness may need mechanical respiratory support and orotracheal intubation.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) There is no specific antidote.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Enhanced elimination is rarely necessary as life threatening toxicity is rare. Multiple dose activated charcoal may be theoretically be beneficial in improving elimination by interrupting enterohepatic circulation, but it is rarely indicated and its use in this setting has not been described. Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion should be effective as nicotine has a small volume of distribution and low protein binding, but they are rarely if ever indicated and their use has not been described. The vast majority of patients do well with supportive care.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Anyone with an intentional ingestion, symptoms other than vomiting, or children who have ingested more than 1 cigarette or 3 or more cigarette butts should be evaluated in a healthcare facility.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients who are asymptomatic after 4 to 6 hours following an oral ingestion of a non-patch product can be discharged. The appropriate duration of observation following ingestion of a patch by a child is not known, but these products contain enough nicotine to cause severe toxicity and may have very delayed absorption; therefore, prolonged observation (24 hours) is recommended in these cases.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with persistent vital sign abnormalities, seizures, altered mental status, or muscle weakness should be admitted.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing severe poisonings or following ingestion of nicotine replacement products by a child.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Urine acidification (while theoretically helpful in enhancing elimination) is not recommended. Failure to adequately observe a patient who ingests a patch product. Avoid using a H2 blocker or proton pump inhibitor initially because nicotine will be absorbed more easily in an alkaline environment.
    I) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Volume of distribution is small at about 1 L/kg and protein binding is limited (about 5%). The half-life at therapeutic doses is about 1 to 2 hours. Peak concentrations are achieved within 0.5 to 2 hours with therapeutic doses. However, absorption may vary significantly by the nicotine delivery system: nasal spray (1 mg dose rises rapidly and can reach maximum venous concentrations of 2 to 12 ng/mL in 4 to 15 minutes) or nicotine inhaler (following a single inhalation the arterial nicotine rises slowly and does not reach the level of smoking a cigarette). Absorption of topical preparations can be significant, especially after repeated dosing.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Symptoms typically develop within 30 minutes to 2 hours after an oral exposure. Symptoms may be immediate after inhalational exposure. Symptoms may be delayed after ingestion of patch products.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Poisoning by cholinergic agents such as organophosphates and carbamate pesticides may produce a similar presentation.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose will vary depending on whether the patient is habituated to the effects of nicotine. CIGARETTES: A regular cigarette may contain 13 to 30 mg of nicotine; a low-nicotine cigarette contains approximately half the nicotine; a cigarette butt may contain 3.75 to 5 mg of nicotine. As little as 1 cigarette or 3 cigarette butts have caused symptoms in children. Signs and symptoms of toxicity appear to correlate with the amount of nicotine ingested. Although an oral lethal dose has not been established, an estimated 40 to 60 mg of nicotine may be lethal. In one series, severe toxicity was reported in 3 children ingesting 1.4 to 1.9 mg/kg of nicotine; children ingesting a mean of 0.8 mg/kg developed mild symptoms and children ingesting a mean of 0.5 mg/kg remained asymptomatic. LIQUID NICOTINE: Refill cartridges used in electronic-cigarettes are available in various strengths ranging from 6 mg/mL (0.6%) to 36 mg/mL (3.6%). It is estimated that 20 drops are equal to 1 mL of solution; 1 drop of 3.6% liquid contains 1.8 mg of nicotine. A potential ingestion of 1 to 2 drops of 3.6% solution (1.8 to 3.6 mg) could produce significant symptoms in a young child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: NICOTINE REPLACEMENT: NICOTINE GUM: Most patients begin treatment with 2 mg pieces of gum and typically take 9 to 12 pieces daily with subsequent tapering. TRANSDERMAL (PATCH): Typically placed for 16 to 24 hours daily and then replaced. NASAL SPRAY: 1 spray (0.5 mg) per nostril every 1 to 2 times per hour. The doses for these products are individualized for the patient, and may vary depending on the degree of habituation.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) SOURCES: Found primarily in tobacco-containing products such as cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, and chewing tobacco and also in nicotine replacement products such as gum, nasal sprays, patches, and electronic cigarettes. Also, found in the tobacco plant (Nicotiana tabacum) and some other plant species; occupational exposures may result from the harvesting or processing of tobacco plants (SEE Plants-Nicotinic Management). Nicotine may also be found in some insecticides (used in the developing world).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Binds to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that are found throughout the body, most notably in the autonomic nervous system (preganglionic sympathetic synapses and pre- and postganglionic parasympathetic synapses).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Toxic effects are dose-related and result from overstimulation of nicotinic receptors, often causing inhibition of receptor action following initial stimulatory effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Very common exposure that can rarely result in significant morbidity and death, especially in children. May be an occupational exposure, commonly known as green tobacco sickness, from working with tobacco plants .
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: NICOTINE REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS: Symptoms may include local irritation from the gum, spray, or transdermal patch or systemic signs (eg, nausea and vomiting, sleep disturbances, headache, and chest pain) of nicotine toxicity. Absorption may occur after ingestion, inhalation, dermal, or rectal exposure.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: GI upset, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, tremor, diaphoresis, tachycardia, pallor, and hypertension are common events.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Seizures, confusion, weakness, bradycardia, hypotension, and respiratory muscle paralysis can develop.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypertension, tachycardia, and tachypnea may occur, followed by hypotension, bradycardia, and bradypnea. Respiratory stimulation is one of the principal signs of nicotine poisoning. High doses can produce fatal respiratory depression of both central and peripheral origin.
    3.3.2) RESPIRATIONS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachypnea may occur early, followed by bradypnea in severe poisonings.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Diaphoresis may be observed with small doses.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypertension may occur early, followed by hypotension in severe poisonings.
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachycardia may occur early, followed by bradycardia in severe poisonings.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) SUMMARY: Miosis, mydriasis, nystagmus, and lacrimation are common. Chronic use may cause tobacco-alcohol amblyopia.
    2) Mydriasis may occur with large doses (Rosenweig et al, 1989; Haruda, 1989).
    3) Lacrimation is common.
    4) Nicotine sulfate is highly toxic and may burn the eyes.
    5) Nicotine-induced nystagmus (NIN) is relatively common and can be produced after smoking a cigarette and also after chewing nicotine gum. It appears that nicotine induces an imbalance in the vestibulo-ocular reflex (Pereira et al, 2000).
    6) Miosis has been reported with small doses (Rosenweig et al, 1989; Haruda, 1989).
    7) Tobacco-alcohol amblyopia has been reported in chronic smokers who also have malnutrition and excessive alcohol consumption. It is characterized by progressive bilateral visual deterioration and loss of color vision (Kermode et al, 1989).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Auditory disturbances may occur with nicotine poisoning (HSDB, 1997).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Inhalation can irritate the nose (EPA, 1985).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) SUMMARY: A burning sensation in the mouth or throat, headache, and salivation are common. Chronic effects of oral snuff use include leukoplakia and oropharyngeal cancer.
    2) BURNING SENSATION: A burning sensation may occur in the mouth or throat.
    3) Salivation may be profuse.
    4) LEUKOPLAKIA: Long-term use of "smokeless" snuff orally has been shown to be habituating and result in gingival recession and a typical white and filmy lesion without elevation from the surrounding oral mucosa (Belonger & Paulson, 1983).
    a) Leukoplakia is considered a premalignant lesion (Moore et al, 1986).
    5) ORAL SUBMUCOUS FIBROSIS: It has been described as a chronic disease of the oral mucosa, which is characterized by inflammation and progressive fibrosis of the lamina propria and deeper connective tissue in individuals who habitually chew panmasala and betel liquid (Babu et al, 1996). These products contain tobacco and are popular in India, Pakistan, and some Asian countries.
    6) Oropharyngeal cancer has been reported after chronic use of "smokeless" tobacco.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute cardiovascular effects of nicotine can include the following: increased heart rate (up to 10 to 15 beats per minute [bpm]), increased blood pressure (up to 5 to 10 mmHg) and increased cardiac output (secondary to increased heart rate and myocardial contractility), and nicotine-mediated catecholamine release resulting in constriction of coronary arteries (Benowitz & Gourlay, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old patient developed agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, dizziness, and nausea after ingesting 7 to 20 cigarettes. Following supportive care, he recovered and was transferred within 24 hours for further psychiatric care (Metzler et al, 2005).
    B) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In small amounts, nicotine may cause increased blood pressure; frequently transient.
    b) CASE REPORT: Elevated blood pressure was reported in a 69-year-old woman following a suicide attempt with application of 2 nicotine patches left on her body for 2 weeks. Her blood pressure returned to normal 4 hours after removal of the patches and skin cleansing (Woolf et al, 1996).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In large doses, decreased blood pressure and pulse may be noted followed by cardiac arrhythmias.
    b) CASE REPORT: Refractory shock, after successful CPR, was reported in a 32-year-old man following the use of multiple patches (plasma nicotine concentration 11 hours after arrest was 3.7 mcg/mL) without apparent decrease in tobacco consumption. He died 4 days later (Sanchez et al, 1996).
    c) CASE REPORT: An 11-year-old boy developed nausea and vomiting, severe weakness, palpitation, headache, and abdominal pain after applying 2 nicotine patches on his arm a few hours apart. Although his vital signs were normal on presentation, his blood pressure dropped to 90/60 mmHg, and pulse dropped to 70 bpm during his stay. Intramuscular atropine sulfate (0.02 mg/kg body weight) was administered; he became asymptomatic after 4 hours (Wain & Martin, 2004).
    D) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORTS
    1) SINOAURICULAR BLOCK: An 18-month-old child demonstrated sinoauricular block following the ingestion of one-fifth of a regular cigarette (approximately 4 mg nicotine) (Gyllensward & Nordbring, 1953).
    2) QT PROLONGATION: Prolonged QT complex was reported in a 37-year-old man following a suicide attempt with application of 12 nicotine patches simultaneously (Woolf et al, 1996).
    E) ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Atrial fibrillation has been reported in a 52-year-old man with preexisting heart disease who ingested 6 pieces of nicotine gum in 1 day (Rigotti & Eagle, 1986).
    b) CASE REPORT: Atrial fibrillation in a 35-year-old man with no history of heart disease was associated with chewing 30 pieces of 2 mg nicotine gum daily (Stewart & Catterall, 1985).
    F) MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) LIQUID NICOTINE: A 24-year-old man was admitted with chest pain of 4 hours duration while using liquid nicotine. He had a 1-month history of using liquid tobacco containing 16 mg of nicotine daily (approximately equivalent to 1 pack of cigarettes) and prior to that he had a 4-year history of smoking one pack of cigarettes daily. An ECG showed ST segment elevation on leads DI, aVL and V1-6 with reciprocal ST segment depression and T-wave inversion on leads a VF, DII and DIII. An echocardiogram was consistent with anterior wall hypokinesis with an ejection fraction of 50%. A troponin level was 223 pg/mL (normal range: 0 to 14 pg/mL). A thrombus in the proximal left anterior descending artery was found on cardiac catheterization. Due to his age and no underlying health conditions, the patient was treated with tissue plasminogen activator which relieved his chest pain and the ECG showed a 70% resolution of ST elevation (Kivrak et al, 2014).
    G) VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old ingested nicotine and developed ventricular fibrillation within 2 minutes. He converted to sinus tachycardia with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) after epinephrine and defibrillation. The patient died of intractable hypertension and anoxic brain death (Lavoie & Harris, 1991).
    H) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT/COMBINATION EXPOSURE: A 32-year-old man was found in cardiac arrest following an episode of dizziness. Following CPR, cardiac activity was recovered, but he remained in nonreactive coma 11 hours later. No ECG signs of cardiac ischemia or dysrhythmias were apparent. He died 4 days later. The family reported the victim's use of multiple nicotine patches with no decrease in tobacco use (Sanchez et al, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT/LIQUID NICOTINE: A 24-year-old woman was found in pulseless electrical activity and had a return of spontaneous circulation after 10 minutes of CPR only (no medications administered) following the intentional ingestion (time of ingestion unknown) of liquid nicotine and whiskey. Two empty 15 mL vials of concentrated nicotine (100 mg/mL) were found near the patient and a suicide note. She was intubated in the field and arrived in the ED about 10 minutes later with fixed and dilated pupils, incontinence, hypotension (74/53 mmHg) and a pulse rate of 106 beats/min. The endotracheal tube required adjustment due to right mainstem intubation. The patient responded slightly to painful stimuli only. A comprehensive drug screen was positive for only nicotine, cotinine, and her previously prescribed medications (ie, trazodone, fluoxetine, and olanzapine). Her nicotine level obtained shortly after arrival was greater than 1000 ng/mL (measured by LC/MS/MS). She continued to have myoclonic jerking despite drug therapy and was noted to have an absent corneal, gag or cough reflexes. An EEG was consistent with poor cerebral dysfunction. On day 2, a MRI of the brain showed multiple acute infarcts consistent with anoxic brain injury. Due to her poor prognosis, intensive treatment was stopped and the patient died 3 days after ingestion (Chen et al, 2015).
    c) CASE REPORT/LIQUID NICOTINE: Ingestion of an unknown amount of 40% solution of nicotine sulfate (357 mg of nicotine/mL) resulted in a cardiac arrest in a 15-year-old. An ECG revealed sinus tachycardia (rate 144 bpm) with multiple atrial premature contractions. After resuscitation, the patient was hypotonic with decerebrate posturing with midline, fixed pupils with the right slightly larger than the left. The patient never recovered cognitive function (Rogers et al, 2004).
    I) VASOSPASM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vasoconstriction occurred in volunteers biting the transdermal nicotine patch Prostep(R), with subsequent oral absorption (Harchelroad et al, 1992).
    J) CHEST PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) TRANSDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH: Chest pain has been reported following the therapeutic use of patches (Henningfield, 1995).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachypnea is common initially.
    B) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dyspnea occurs after tachypnea.
    C) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Airway irritation in the lower neck and upper chest region with associated cough has been shown to be directly correlated to nicotine content in cigarette smoke. Hexamethonium, a nicotinic blocking agent, blocks the respiratory tract irritation when administered prior to cigarette smoke inhalation (Lee et al, 1993).
    D) APNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory failure may occur rapidly (5 minutes postingestion), especially with large ingestions, and may be fatal (Singer & Janz, 1990).
    E) PULMONARY ASPIRATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Aspiration pneumonitis developed in a 32-year-old man who sustained a cardiac arrest after suspected nicotine overdose (Sanchez et al, 1996).
    F) SPUTUM ABNORMAL - AMOUNT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Increased secretions are a common cholinergic effect.

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Confusion, anxiety, dizziness, restlessness, and incoordination may occur.
    b) CASE REPORT: Lethargy and depressed respirations were reported in an 8-month-old infant 2.5 hours after ingesting 2 cigarette butts. Lethargy progressed to obtundation with minimal responsiveness. Gradual improvement occurred, with recovery by the third day (Borys et al, 1988).
    c) Stupor, confusion, and dizziness were reported in 2 patients following suicide attempts with nicotine dermal patches. No coingestants were involved (Woolf et al, 1996).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man, with a history of cerebral infarct of the right hemisphere, intentionally ingested a nicotine extract (prepared by extracting 300 g of tobacco, producing an estimated 6780 mg of nicotine). The "recipe" was found on an Internet site. The patient drank the extract and immediately felt ill and vomited. Upon admission, the patient was somnolent and showed marked hyperextension of the neck and slurred speech. Tachycardia was observed, which normalized on the second day. The patient gradually improved with supportive care and returned to baseline within 4 days (Schneider et al, 2009). The authors suggested that only a portion of the extract was absorbed due to vomiting, and residue of the extract was also found near the patient.
    e) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man developed agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, dizziness, and nausea after ingesting 7 to 20 cigarettes. Following supportive care, he recovered and was transferred to psychiatric care within 24 hours of admission (Metzler et al, 2005).
    B) HEADACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) TRANSDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH: Headache has been reported following the therapeutic use of patches (Henningfield, 1995).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Headache may occur after oral or dermal exposure to small amounts of nicotine (Haruda, 1989).
    C) PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Agitation is common in young children with tobacco ingestion (Smolinske et al, 1988).
    D) TREMOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Even 2 cigarettes (nicotine) increased the amplitude but not the frequency of hand tremors associated with habitual smokers (Shiffman et al, 1983).
    E) HYPOREFLEXIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) NEUROMUSCULAR DEPRESSION: Following a large ingestion, weakness, fasciculations, hypotonia, and decreased deep tendon reflexes, progressing to paralysis may occur.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In large doses, nicotine may cause seizures.
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) ANORECTAL EXPOSURE: A toddler had a generalized grand mal seizure 15 minutes following the administration of a tobacco infusion enema (Oberst & McIntyre, 1953).
    2) CIGARETTES: Seizures were reported in 4 children who ingested 2 cigarettes each (Malizia et al, 1983).
    3) GUM: Seizures and apnea were attributed to nicotine gum ingestion in a 20-month-old child (Singer & Janz, 1990); however, the ingestion was not confirmed.
    4) TRANSDERMAL PATCH: Seizure was reported in an 11-month-old after a used nicotine patch (21 mg/24 hr) inadvertently adhered to the infant's skin (Ryan et al, 1999). Symptoms of lethargy continued until the patch was found and removed, with a marked improvement noted at 15 minutes and complete resolution within 4 hours.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROINTESTINAL IRRITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A burning sensation is the initial symptom. It is present in the mouth, throat, esophagus, and stomach.
    B) EXCESSIVE SALIVATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Salivation occurs after small doses.
    C) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) TRANSDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH: Nausea and vomiting have been reported following the therapeutic use of patches (Henningfield, 1995).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vomiting may occur very early (within minutes) after tobacco ingestion, minimizing absorption and other toxic manifestations (Lavoie & Harris, 1991). Vomiting occurs in 16% to 63% of tobacco and nicotine chewing gum ingestions in children (Smolinske et al, 1988; Bonadio & Anderson, 1989) (Edwards & Volan, 1985) (Peder et al, 1984) (Litleskare et al, 1994).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man developed agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, dizziness, and nausea after ingesting 7 to 20 cigarettes. Following supportive care, he recovered and was transferred to the psychiatry department within 24 hours of hospitalization (Metzler et al, 2005).
    D) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Abdominal pain occurs with low doses and is usually not severe.
    E) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Diarrhea has been reported with low doses. A delayed (4 to 24 hours) symptom occurs in 14% of pediatric tobacco ingestions (Smolinske et al, 1988).
    b) CASE REPORT: Voluminous diarrhea, estimated at 1 L/hr, developed in a 32-year-old man who sustained a cardiac arrest after suspected nicotine overdose (Sanchez et al, 1996).
    F) GASTRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) "GREEN TOBACCO SICKNESS": A mild form of nicotine poisoning has been reported in both adults and children, smokers and nonsmokers, working on tobacco farms. The usual presentation is an individual who has been handling wet, uncured tobacco leaves for 6 hours or more per day , with the onset of signs and symptoms 3 to 24 hours later (Gehlbach et al, 1975; Ross et al, 1994a; Ross et al, 1994b; McKnight et al, 1994; Hipke, 1993). Symptoms can include nausea and vomiting and can be treated with antiemetics. Prevention can be accomplished by using protective clothing.

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Acute renal failure attributed to rhabdomyolysis (myoglobin 18700 mcg/L, CPK 7007 IU/L) developed in a 32-year-old man who sustained a cardiac arrest following suspected nicotine overdose (plasma nicotine concentration 11 hours after arrest was 3.7 mcg/mL) (Sanchez et al, 1996).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Intense sweating may occur.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old man was reported to have pallor and sweating 2 hours after application of 12 nicotine patches (Woolf et al, 1996).
    B) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) OCCUPATIONAL DERMATOSES: Nicotine and its derivatives have shown positive reactions in human skin patch tests and dermatoses have been reported by workers processing tobacco or working in nicotine production (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    C) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) TRANSDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH: Skin rash has been reported following the therapeutic use of patches (Henningfield, 1995).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Probable rhabdomyolysis (myoglobin 18700 mcg/L, creatine kinase 7007 IU/L) was reported in a 32-year-old man who sustained cardiac arrest after suspected nicotine overdose (Sanchez et al, 1996).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE ALLERGIC REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) TRANSDERMAL NICOTINE PATCH: Allergic skin reactions have been reported following the therapeutic use of patches (Henningfield, 1995).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Nicotine is a possible human teratogen.
    B) Nicotine is teratogenic in mice, but not in several other species. It crosses the placenta and is excreted in breast milk. It has reduced fertility in male and female rats.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    1) Developmental abnormalities in the cardiovascular system were observed in the offspring of a woman who ingested nicotine. Toxic effects on the embryo have also been observed in the monkey (RTECS, 1997).
    B) ERYTHROCYTES ABNORMAL
    1) Although smoking may not cause significant changes in maternal hemoglobin, fetal blood shows changes consistent with chronic carbon monoxide poisoning, ie, a left shift in the O2 saturation of hemoglobin, and an increase in hematocrit and total hemoglobin (Bureau et al, 1983). Buchan (1983) measured blood viscosity in newborns of mothers who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day. He found a 30% increase composed of a 12% increase in packed cell volume and an 18% decrease in red cell deformability.
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) Nicotine was teratogenic in the mouse, but not in the rat, cow, sheep, or rabbit (Schardein, 1993). Nicotine produced skeletal system malformations in mice when injected subcutaneously on days 9 to 11 of gestation (Nishiura & Nakai, 1958).
    b) Nicotine sulfate produced defects in the cervical cord and neural tube of chicks when injected into the vitellin sac at 48 hours. At 72 hours it produced abnormal cervical vertebrae (Landauer, 1960). When given on day 5, it produced smaller chicks (HSDB, 1997). The significance of this finding for human exposure is unknown.
    2) FETOTOXICITY
    a) In rodent studies, fetotoxicity, biochemical, metabolic, behavioral effects, and specific developmental abnormalities of skin appendages, the craniofacial area, the urogenital system, the respiratory system, and the musculoskeletal system were observed. Fetal death and changes in growth statistics and the weaning or lactation index were also observed (RTECS, 1997).
    b) Fetal rats had reduced brain development and body weight after subcutaneous injection of 6 mg/kg/day from days 4 to 20 of gestation (Slotkin et al, 1986). Fetal rats exposed in utero to infused nicotine had impairment of cardiac function during postnatal hypoxia (Slotkin et al, 1997).
    3) BONE DEVELOPMENT ABNORMAL
    a) Delayed ossification and reduced fetal weight were produced in rats given aqueous extracts of smokeless tobacco equivalent to 6 mg/kg nicotine on days 6 to 18 of gestation (Paulson et al, 1994).
    4) EMPHYSEMA
    a) Emphysema-like damage involving defects in elastic tissue formation occurred in the lungs of fetal rats with dams exposed to 1 mg/kg nicotine per day on day 7 of gestation to birth (Maritz et al, 1993). Exposure was continued by nursing until 3 weeks after birth.
    5) PERSONALITY DISORDER
    a) Prenatal nicotine exposure in rodents is associated with postnatal behavioral abnormalities or neurotransmitter changes in a number of studies using various methodologies (Cutler et al, 1996) Seidler at al, 1994; (Paulson et al, 1994; van de Kamp & Collins, 1994).
    6) DEATH
    a) Increased postnatal deaths and some behavioral differences were seen in rats treated with smokeless tobacco extracts on days 6 to 20 of gestation at doses up to 18 mg/kg of nicotine per day (Paulson et al, 1994).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) HYPOXIA
    1) Although smoking may not cause significant changes in maternal hemoglobin, fetal blood shows changes consistent with chronic carbon monoxide poisoning, ie, a left shift in the O2 saturation of hemoglobin, and an increase in hematocrit and total hemoglobin (Bureau et al, 1983).
    B) BIRTHWEIGHT
    1) ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    a) Eskenazi et al (1995), in a controlled study, reported an inverse relationship between maternal serum cotinine levels and birthweight. Every nanogram per milliliter increase in maternal cotinine level decreased birthweight by 1 gram.
    C) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Nicotine freely passes into the placenta and is found in both amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood (Luck & Nau, 1984; Hibberd et al, 1978).
    2) In a short-term study of transderm nicotine replacement (total time patch worn = 480 minutes), no adverse maternal or fetal effects were reported (Wright et al, 1997).
    3) Nicotine use during the last trimester has been associated with a decrease in fetal breathing movements, possibly resulting from decreased placental perfusion (Prod Info Nicorette(R), Nicotine polacrilex, 1991). Nicotine is readily transferred to the fetus throughout pregnancy; the fetus is actually exposed to higher nicotine concentrations than the mother (Luck et al, 1985).
    D) ERYTHROCYTES ABNORMAL
    1) Buchan (1983) measured blood viscosity in newborns of mothers who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day. He found a 30% increase composed of a 12% increase in packed cell volume and an 18% decrease in red cell deformability.
    E) DIABETES
    1) In a study of 4917 patients from the British National Child Development Study observed through age 33 years, maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in the offspring(Montgomery & Ekbom, 2002). Odds ratio of developing type 2 diabetes between ages 16 and 33 years for offspring of women who were medium to heavy smokers (self-reported smoking varied between 1 and 9 cigarettes/day and more than 10/day) was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.27 to 13.4). The odds ratio for developing type 2 diabetes between ages 16 and age 33 years in offspring of heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day) was 4.55 (95% CI, 1.82 to 11.36).
    F) PRETERM DELIVERY AND PREECLAMPSIA
    1) In one study, 789 snuff (smokeless tobacco) users and 11,240 smokers were compared with 11,495 nonusers to evaluate the effects of tobacco use during pregnancy. Snuff use during pregnancy was associated with restricted fetal growth (adjusted mean birth weight reduced in snuff users by 39 g compared with nonusers; 95% CI, 6 to 72 g) and increased preterm delivery risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.46 to 2.68). Cigarette smoking during pregnancy was associated with restricted fetal growth (adjusted mean birth weight reduced in smokers by 190 g compared with nonusers; 95% CI, 178 to 202 g), and increased preterm delivery risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.38 to 1.80). Although preeclampsia was reduced in smokers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.75), snuff use was associated with increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.27) (England et al, 2003).
    G) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In rodent studies, toxic effects were observed in parturition and in the postpartum stage. Changes in litter size, viability index, live birth index, postimplantation mortality and stillbirth were also observed (RTECS, 1997).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) PERINATAL DISORDER
    1) Nicotine is excreted in breast milk in small quantities that are not usually clinically important (Ferguson et al, 1976). However, heavy smoking by the mother may cause nausea or vomiting in the nursing infant, as well as behavioral changes (Abel, 1984).
    B) BREAST MILK
    1) The milk:serum nicotine concentration ratio averaged 2.92 in 1 group of nursing smokers (Luck & Nau, 1984a) and the nursing infants' serum:maternal serum nicotine concentration was 0.06 (Luck & Nau, 1984).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS54-11-5 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Use of smokeless tobacco has been shown to cause oral-pharyngeal cancer.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) ORAL-PHARYNGEAL CANCER: The use of smokeless tobacco has been shown to cause oral-pharyngeal cancer, primarily of the cheek and gums. Snuff dippers have a 4.2 times greater risk for oral cancer and a 50 times greater risk of buccal mucosa cancer than nonsmoking, nonchewing patients (Winn et al, 1981).
    2) Leukoplakia (white mucosal lesions) is found in 18% to 64% of users. Between 1.8% and 17.5% of leukoplakias eventually become malignant (Connolly et al, 1986).
    3) Moist snuff (US brands) contain various carcinogens, including aromatic hydrocarbons, radiation-emitting polonium, and various nitrosamines in concentrations of 9600 to 289,000 parts per billion (Palladino et al, 1986; MMWR, 1985; Tricker et al, 1988). Newer brands have reduced the amount of nitrosamines (Hoffmann et al, 1991).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Nicotine has not been carcinogenic in rats with chronic feeding or subcutaneous injection (Clayton & Clayton, 1994). Anecdotal observation has revealed a correlation between appearance of esophageal tumors in sheep and the use of nicotine-containing dips (Schuette, 1968).
    B) IN VITRO
    1) A study with the use of culture systems and animal xenograft models showed that nicotine stimulates the progression of tumor growth through a cyclooxygenase-2-dependent pathway. The authors noted that based on these findings, nicotine seems to be a potent mitogenic agent in modulating tumor cell proliferation. The authors noted that selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibiting agents are promising antitumor agents for nicotine-associated gastric cancer (Shin & Cho, 2005).

Genotoxicity

    A) DNA inhibition, mutagenicity, and chromosome aberrations have been demonstrated experimentally.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) No testing is required in patients with mild or no symptoms.
    B) Serum chemistries, creatine kinase, lactate, urinalysis should be performed in patients with severe poisonings.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in all symptomatic patients.
    D) Serum levels are not readily available or useful to guide management.
    E) Urine cotinine levels can be obtained for occupational monitoring.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Nicotine laboratory determination is normally not performed.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes, kidney function tests, and CPK in severely symptomatic patients.
    3) The concentration of nicotine in the plasma of nonsmokers has ranged from 0 to 0.006 mg/L. Smokers have ranged from 0.012 to 0.044 mg/L 30 minutes after a 6.5-hour period of smoking (Baselt & Cravey, 1995).
    4) The steady-state level in plasma of persons chewing nicotine gum containing 2 mg or 4 mg is 0.012 or 0.023 mg/L, respectively (Baselt & Cravey, 1995).
    5) Postmortem blood levels have ranged from 11 to 63 mg/L in persons who ingested 10 to 25 g nicotine sulfate (Baselt & Cravey, 1995).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) SUMMARY: In general, smokers will have urine cotinine levels greater than 50 nanograms(ng)/mL. Even environmental exposure to smoke will produce a urine value of less than 20 ng/mL in 92% of tested cases. Consumption of nicotine-containing foods in regular amounts are also likely to elevate urine cotinine above 50 ng/mL (Apseloff et al, 1994).
    2) Cotinine levels in plasma, saliva, and urine correlate with passive exposure to smoke.
    3) Urine cotinine levels can be used to follow occupational exposure in tobacco pickers (4(6)).
    B) URINALYSIS
    1) Monitor urinalysis and urine myoglobin in severely symptomatic patients.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor ECG and vital signs in symptomatic patients.
    2) SALIVA
    a) Levels of COTININE in saliva have been a somewhat useful measure of recent cigarette consumption, but greater accuracy is obtained by correcting for age and a cubic nonlinear component (Swan et al, 1993).
    b) Salivary cotinine measurements may be utilized to determine smoking status in the presence of a transdermal patch or other nonoral source of nicotine (WHO, 1994).
    3) HAIR
    a) SUMMARY: Neonates whose mothers were exposed to passive (environmental) smoke, as well as those of maternal smokers, have significantly higher concentrations of hair cotinine when compared with those whose mothers have had no smoke exposure (Koren, 1995).
    1) Levels of cotinine, nicotine, or both in fetal hair are useful for documenting smoking during pregnancy. Methods have been published for determining levels of nicotine and cotinine in fetal and maternal hair (Klein et al, 1994; Kintz & Mangin, 1993).
    2) A radioimmunoassay method has a lower limit of sensitivity of 0.25 ng/mg hair for nicotine and 0.1 ng/mg hair for cotinine, based on a 2 mg sample of hair (Klein et al, 1994).

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) High pressure liquid chromatography methodology is available (Kyerematen et al, 1982)
    2) A method for analysis of nicotine in fetal and maternal hair samples involves decontamination in methylene chloride, homogenization in sodium hydroxide, extraction in diethyl ether at pH 14, separation on a BP-5 capillary column, and quantification using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Kintz & Mangin, 1993).
    B) OTHER
    1) Aalders et al (1986) describe a method of analysis that can be used for nicotine, cotinine, or both in urine or plasma.
    2) Nicotine laboratory determination is normally not performed.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Onset of symptoms may be rapid (Malizia et al, 1983). Emesis is usually spontaneous. Since seizures or lethargy may occur within 15 minutes, IPECAC-INDUCED EMESIS OR ACTIVATED CHARCOAL IS NOT ADVISED IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING. Remove transdermal patches and wash exposed skin.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    3) Multiple dose activated charcoal may enhance the elimination of nicotine, although there are no data to confirm this hypothesis and its use is not routinely recommended (Ivey & Triggs, 1978) (4(6)).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    B) ATROPINE
    1) Atropine may be used for control of signs of excess parasympathetic stimulation.
    2) ATROPINE/DOSE
    a) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    1) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    2) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    D) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) No testing is required in patients with mild or no symptoms.
    2) Serum chemistries, creatine kinase, lactate, urinalysis should be performed in a patient with severe poisoning.
    3) Obtain ECG in symptomatic patients, monitor cardiac function closely.
    4) Serum levels are not readily available or useful to guide management. Urine levels can be obtained for occupational monitoring.
    E) ANTACID
    1) Antacids are contraindicated because nicotine is better absorbed in an alkaline media (Ivey & Trigg, 1978).
    F) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    2) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    3) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    4) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    5) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Emesis may be dangerous due to rapid onset of symptoms. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Emesis may be dangerous, due to rapid onset of symptoms. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    2) Use cool water when washing; hot water may speed absorption of nicotinic substances still present on the skin (Hipke, 1993).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Enhanced elimination is rarely necessary as life threatening toxicity is rare. Multiple dose activated charcoal may be theoretically beneficial in improving elimination by interrupting enterohepatic circulation, but it is rarely indicated and its use in this setting has not been described. Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion should be effective as nicotine has a small volume of distribution and low protein binding, but they are rarely if ever indicated and their use has not been described. The vast majority of patients do well with supportive care.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with persistent vital sign abnormalities, seizures, altered mental status, or muscle weakness should be admitted.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) SUMMARY: Anyone with an intentional ingestion, symptoms other than vomiting, or children who have ingested more than 1 cigarette or 3 or more cigarette butts should be evaluated in a health care facility.
    B) CASE SERIES: In a prospective series of 347 children (mean age 14 months) who ingested nicotine-containing products (137 cigarettes, 187 cigarette butts, 3 cigars, 2 loose tobacco, 15 pieces of nicotine gum, and 1 nicotine patch), only 8 children were evaluated at a health care facility, and all were discharged without problems. Vomiting developed in 104 children (30%), mild CNS symptoms such as restlessness developed in 28 (8%), and 227 (65%) remained asymptomatic. The quantity of the tobacco ingested was not reported. The authors concluded that most children who ingest tobacco products can be safely managed at home (Johnson & Wilkins, 1996). In another prospective study of 700 children, significant toxicity (ie, seizures) was not reported. Children that were initially asymptomatic did not subsequently develop symptoms. The lack of early symptoms (ie, onset of vomiting within 20 minutes or less {observed in 97.9% of symptomatic children}) appeared to be a likely predictor of no subsequent toxicity. Due to the difficulty in quantifying the exact amount a child has ingested, the type and onset of symptoms appears to be a better predictor of outcome (McGee et al, 1995).
    C) PEDIATRIC INGESTION: In another study of pediatric cigarette ingestion, assuming a cigarette contains a minimum of 13 mg of nicotine, severe toxicity was reported in 3 children ingesting 1.4 to 1.9 mg/kg of nicotine; children ingesting a mean of 0.8 mg/kg (range: 0.2 to 1.8 mg/kg) developed mild symptoms and children ingesting a mean of 0.5 mg/kg (range: 0.3 to 1 mg/kg) remained asymptomatic (Smolinske et al, 1988).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing severe poisonings or following ingestion of nicotine replacement products by a child.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who are asymptomatic after 4 to 6 hours following an oral ingestion of a non-patch product can be discharged. The appropriate duration of observation following ingestion of a patch by a child is not known, but these products contain enough nicotine to cause severe toxicity and may have very delayed absorption, therefore, prolonged observation (24 hours) is recommended in these cases.
    6.3.5) DISPOSITION/DERMAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.5.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/DERMAL
    A) TRANSDERMAL PATCHES/ADULT: Woolf et al (1996) observed 55 adults who had misused or overdosed on dermal application of transdermal patches (2 to 20 patches). Those who had deliberately placed multiple patches on themselves (n=9) were also likely to have ingested other substances in suicide attempts. This presentation is usually clinically serious, including CNS, cardiovascular, and respiratory complications. Most patients exposed to multiple patches required hospital admission (Woolf et al, 1996).

Monitoring

    A) No testing is required in patients with mild or no symptoms.
    B) Serum chemistries, creatine kinase, lactate, urinalysis should be performed in patients with severe poisonings.
    C) Obtain an ECG and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in all symptomatic patients.
    D) Serum levels are not readily available or useful to guide management.
    E) Urine cotinine levels can be obtained for occupational monitoring.

Case Reports

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL
    a) NICOTINE GUM: A case of nicotine overdose was reported in a 23-year-old woman following chewing of a single 2 mg piece of Nicorette(R) gum. The patient was a 2 pack/day smoker. On routine examination the day prior to beginning Nicorette(R), her blood pressure was 100/70 mmHg. Following chewing 1 piece of gum for approximately 60 seconds, the patient felt nauseated and tremulous. Within 20 minutes she became nauseated, flushed, had a dry mouth, and experienced palpitations. She began to sweat profusely and noted pruritus (Mensch & Holden, 1984).
    1) She was transported to the emergency room and on the way experienced blurred vision and mental confusion. Initial examination in the ER revealed a blood pressure of 86/50 and pulse of 120/minute. She recovered uneventfully following Compazine(R), morphine, and atropine. It was unclear why this patient experienced toxic symptoms after chewing a single 2 mg piece of Nicorette(R).
    b) NICOTINE GUM: Atrial fibrillation has been reported in a 52-year-old man with preexisting heart disease who ingested 6 pieces of nicotine gum in 1 day (Rigotti & Eagle, 1986).
    c) NICOTINE GUM: Atrial fibrillation in a 35-year-old man with no history of heart disease was associated with chewing 30 pieces of 2 mg nicotine gum daily (Stewart & Catterall, 1985).
    d) NICOTINE: A 17-year-old ingested nicotine and arrested within 2 minutes. Epinephrine was used to convert to ventricular fibrillation, the defibrillation was used to produce sinus tachycardia with PVCs. The patient died of intractable hypertension and anoxic brain death (Lavoie & Harris, 1991).
    e) DERMAL: A 51-year-old woman used a 40% nicotine sulfate insecticide solution to treat her scabies and severe pruritus. Nausea and vomiting developed 15 minutes after application. Two hours later, she was lethargic but arousable and oriented, weak, had nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps. Vital signs included blood pressure (150/100), heart rate (90), respiratory rate (15, irregular with periods of apnea), miosis, and absent deep tendon reflexes. Dermal decontamination was accomplished, but plasma cotinine levels continued to rise until at least 13 hours after exposure, while nicotine levels remained constant, indicating continued dermal absorption despite decontamination. In spite of rising levels, rapid tolerance developed (Benowitz et al, 1987).
    B) INFANT
    1) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    a) SMOKELESS TOBACCO: A 14-month-old boy ingested the contents of a spittoon. About 45 minutes after ingestion, the child had involuntary twitching of arms and legs, and received 10 cc of ipecac upon recommendation at about 75 minutes postingestion. On transport to the hospital, the boy was pale, cold, and clammy, listless and lethargic, and difficult to arouse. Vital signs were normal at about 2 hours postingestion. Patient received activated charcoal, which he vomited, and was observed until 1.5 hours postingestion. No further symptoms were noted (Goepferd, 1986).
    b) CIGARETTE INGESTION: An 18-month-old child demonstrated a sinoauricular block following the ingestion of one-fifth of a regular cigarette (approximately 4 mg of nicotine) (Gyllensward & Nordbring, 1953).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose will vary depending on whether the patient is habituated to the effects of nicotine. CIGARETTES: A regular cigarette may contain 13 to 30 mg of nicotine; a low-nicotine cigarette contains approximately half the nicotine; a cigarette butt may contain 3.75 to 5 mg of nicotine. As little as 1 cigarette or 3 cigarette butts have caused symptoms in children. Signs and symptoms of toxicity appear to correlate with the amount of nicotine ingested. Although an oral lethal dose has not been established, an estimated 40 to 60 mg of nicotine may be lethal. In one series, severe toxicity was reported in 3 children ingesting 1.4 to 1.9 mg/kg of nicotine; children ingesting a mean of 0.8 mg/kg developed mild symptoms and children ingesting a mean of 0.5 mg/kg remained asymptomatic. LIQUID NICOTINE: Refill cartridges used in electronic-cigarettes are available in various strengths ranging from 6 mg/mL (0.6%) to 36 mg/mL (3.6%). It is estimated that 20 drops are equal to 1 mL of solution; 1 drop of 3.6% liquid contains 1.8 mg of nicotine. A potential ingestion of 1 to 2 drops of 3.6% solution (1.8 to 3.6 mg) could produce significant symptoms in a young child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: NICOTINE REPLACEMENT: NICOTINE GUM: Most patients begin treatment with 2 mg pieces of gum and typically take 9 to 12 pieces daily with subsequent tapering. TRANSDERMAL (PATCH): Typically placed for 16 to 24 hours daily and then replaced. NASAL SPRAY: 1 spray (0.5 mg) per nostril every 1 to 2 times per hour. The doses for these products are individualized for the patient, and may vary depending on the degree of habituation.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ACUTE
    1) Nicotine is highly toxic. About 2 to 5 mg can cause nausea. The lethal oral dose for adults has been estimated to be approximately 40 to 60 mg (Malizia et al, 1983) or 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg in an adult (Salomon, 2006). Survival has been reported after ingestion of 1 to 4 g (Franke & Thomas, 1936).
    B) LIQUID NICOTINE
    1) CASE REPORTS
    a) A 24-year-old woman was found in pulseless electrical activity and had a return of spontaneous circulation after 10 minutes of CPR only (no medications administered) following the intentional ingestion (time of ingestion unknown) of liquid nicotine and whiskey. Two empty 15 mL vials of concentrated nicotine (100 mg/mL) were found near the patient and a suicide note. She was intubated in the field and arrived in the ED about 10 minutes later with fixed and dilated pupils, incontinence, hypotension (74/53 mmHg) and a pulse rate of 106 beats/min. The endotracheal tube required adjustment due to right mainstem intubation. The patient responded slightly to painful stimuli only. A comprehensive drug screen was positive for only nicotine, cotinine, and her previously prescribed medications (ie, trazodone, fluoxetine, and olanzapine). Her nicotine level obtained shortly after arrival was greater than 1000 ng/mL (measured by LC/MS/MS). She continued to have myoclonic jerking despite drug therapy and was noted to have an absence of corneal, gag or cough reflexes. An EEG was consistent with poor cerebral dysfunction. On day 2, a MRI of the brain showed multiple acute infarcts consistent with anoxic brain injury. Due to her poor prognosis, intensive treatment was stopped and the patient died 3 days after ingestion (Chen et al, 2015).
    b) A 29-year-old man with a history of depression was found unresponsive after purportedly injecting himself (a suicide note was found) with an unknown amount of liquid nicotine used with an electronic delivery system. Initially, he was found pulseless and CPR was started by EMS and he was intubated in the field. Upon arrival he was in normal sinus rhythm but remained unresponsive. A short time later he developed tonic-clonic seizures and required fosphenytoin and levetiracetam to finally control the seizures. By day 5, he was diagnosed with anoxic encephalopathy and declared brain dead. A blood examination collected on the day of arrival showed a serum nicotine level of 2000 ng/mL (normal, 5 to 90 ng/mL) and cotinine was 2100 ng/mL (normal, 100 to 1200 ng/mL). Based on these blood levels, it was estimated that the patient could have injected over 400 mg of nicotine. Although an injection site was never found, the authors suggested the patient may have ingested the liquid nicotine (Thornton et al, 2014).
    c) A 34-year-old man, with a history of psychosis, was found dead by his family with 3 empty vials of liquid nicotine found in his room. There was no evidence of trauma and his postmortem exam was positive for nicotine. A remaining vial (brand Titanum Ice) was tested and found to contain a nicotine concentration of 74 mg/mL. The lethal dose calculated (based on 1 mg/kg body weight) for this patient was 72.5 mg nicotine, thus the patient could have ingested a single vial (containing 50 mL of 72 mg/mL) and would have ingested approximately 50 times as high as the estimated lethal dose (Bartschat et al, 2015).
    C) NICOTINE SULFATE
    1) HUMAN EXPOSURE: Nicotine sulfate is classified as super toxic. The probable oral lethal dose in humans is less than 5 mg/kg (less than 7 drops) for a 70 kg (150 pound) person (EPA, 1985).
    a) Five adults who swallowed 20 to 25 g nicotine sulfate solution died within 1 hour (Baselt & Cravey, 1995).
    D) ANIMAL DATA
    1) Amounts of 10 mg/kg administered buccally in dogs is considered potentially fatal (Franke, 1932).
    2) Twenty-one of 32 chicks died when 0.07 mg/egg nicotine sulfate was administered to chick embryos at stage 11 of development (HSDB, 1997).
    3) Albino rats were unable to survive on diets containing more than 0.05% nicotine sulfate (Wilson & DeEds, 1936).
    4) Mortalities in bird species (eg, mallards, pheasants, coturnix, pigeons) occurred as soon as 6 minutes or as late as 2 days following treatment (HSDB, 1997).
    5) The lethal dose for 18-month-old lambs has been estimated at 0.2 to 0.3 g. Toxic dose for adult sheep is 0.7 to 1 g. Poisoning in bulls and heifers from 1 year to 18 months of age occurred at a 1 g dose level (HSDB, 1997).
    6) An attempt to use 1.2% solution of nicotine sulfate as tsetse-fly repellent by spraying over cattle led to deaths within 1 hour (HSDB, 1997).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) NICOTINE CONTENT
    1) One regular cigarette contains 15 to 30 mg nicotine
    2) One low nicotine cigarette contains 3 to 8 mg nicotine
    3) One cigarette butt contains 3.75 to 7 mg nicotine
    4) One cigar contains 15 to 40 mg nicotine
    5) One gram snuff (wet) contains 12 to 16 mg nicotine
    6) One gram chewing tobacco contains 6 to 8 mg nicotine
    7) One piece of nicotine chewing gum contains 2 or 4 mg nicotine
    8) One nicotine patch contains 8.3 to 22 mg nicotine
    9) One nicotine nasal spray contains 0.5 mg nicotine
    10) Nicotine refill cartridges used in electronic-cigarettes are available in various strengths ranging from 6 mg/mL (0.6%) to 36 mg/mL (3.6%)
    1) (Gupta et al, 2014; Salomon, 2006; McGee et al, 1995; Armitage et al, 1975).
    2) BIDI cigarettes, imported from India, contain cured flakes and dust of dark tobacco leaves rolled in dried tendu leaves. Despite containing less tobacco, a single bidi produces 3 times as much nicotine and carbon monoxide as the standard American cigarette. Also, the tendu leaf wrapper does not burn well; therefore, a smoker has to inhale frequently and deeply, which could result in large amount of tar being deposited into the airways (Yen et al, 2000).
    B) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INGESTION
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Survival has been reported after ingestion of 1 to 4 g (Franke & Thomas, 1936).
    b) ADULT
    1) CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man, with a history of cerebral infarct of the right hemisphere, intentionally ingested a nicotine extract (prepared by extracting 300 g tobacco, producing an estimated 6780 mg nicotine). The "recipe" was found on an Internet site. The patient drank the extract and immediately felt ill and vomited. Upon admission, the patient was somnolent and showed marked hyperextension of the neck and slurred speech. Tachycardia was observed, which normalized on the second day. The patient gradually improved with supportive care, and returned to baseline within 4 days (Schneider et al, 2009).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old patient developed agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, dizziness, and nausea after ingesting 7 to 20 cigarettes on 7 different occasions within 15 months. Following supportive care, he recovered and was transferred to the psychiatry department within 24 hours (Metzler et al, 2005).
    c) PEDIATRIC
    1) CHILDREN: More severe symptoms occur in infants (younger than 1 year) than in older children. In young children, as little as 1 mg of nicotine can produce symptoms (Salomon, 2006).
    2) Studies have been conducted to quantify the amount of nicotine responsible for producing symptoms following the ingestion of cigarettes or cigarette butts in children less than 6 years of age. In one series, assuming a cigarette contains a minimum of 13 mg of nicotine, severe toxicity was reported in 3 children ingesting 1.4 to 1.9 mg/kg of nicotine (brief periods of limb twitching or unresponsiveness); children ingesting a mean of 0.8 mg/kg (range: 0.2 to 1.8 mg/kg) developed mild symptoms and children ingesting a mean of 0.5 mg/kg (range: 0.3 to 1 mg/kg) remained asymptomatic (Smolinske et al, 1988).
    a) In another study, the number of cigarettes or cigarette butts reportedly ingested was found to be a poor predictor of toxicity, due in part to the difficulty in determining the actual number of cigarettes ingested or the amount of nicotine absorbed. During 1988 and 1991, a total of 700 children exposed to tobacco products were followed by the Delaware Valley Regional Poison Control Center. Of the 700 children enrolled, 44 patients ingested 2 cigarettes or 6 cigarette butts, 20 became symptomatic and all vomited. Of the remaining 24 children that were initially asymptomatic, 23 (1 was lost to follow-up) remained asymptomatic during their ED admission. Of the 656 children ingesting less than 2 cigarettes or 6 cigarette butts, 123 (18%) became symptomatic. Vomiting was observed in 89 (74.2%) of the 120 (3 were lost to follow-up) patients. Irritability and lethargy were observed in 4 children. There were no reports of seizures, coma or respiratory difficulties in any child. Children that were initially asymptomatic did not develop symptoms. The lack of early symptoms (ie, onset of vomiting within 20 minutes or less {observed in 97.9% of symptomatic children}) appeared to be a likely predictor of no subsequent toxicity (McGee et al, 1995).
    b) During January 1994 to July 1996, the Rode Island Poison Control Center received 146 reports of nicotine ingestion by children less than 6 years of age, follow-up was available for 90 children (mean age: 11.7 months) with no reports of severe toxicity. Of the 50 children ingesting cigarettes, 36 ingested less than 1 cigarette, and of the 40 children ingesting a cigarette butt, 22 ingested less than 1 cigarette butt. Thirty children developed minor symptoms which included: vomiting (n=26), nausea (n=2), pallor (n=2), lethargy (n=1) and gagging (n=3). All 30 children recovered within 12 hours (None Listed, 1997).
    2) LIQUID NICOTINE
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Electronic cigarette solutions have mean nicotine concentration of 8.5 to 22.2 mg/mL. Refills are available in 5, 10 or 20 mL vials. Based on social media sites, it has been suggested that a typical e-cigarette smoker uses on average 2 nicotine cartridges a day which is equivalent to 40 traditional cigarettes (Lowry, 2014).
    2) Electronic-cigarette users frequently use refill cartridges containing liquid nicotine that are available in various strengths ranging from 6 mg/mL (0.6%) to 36 mg/mL (3.6%). It is estimated that 20 drops are equal to 1 mL of solution; 1 drop of 3.6% liquid contains 1.8 mg of nicotine. A potential ingestion of 1 to 2 drops of 3.6% solution (1.8 to 3.6 mg) could produce significant symptoms in a young child (Gupta et al, 2014).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) A 24-year-old man intentionally ingested 180 mg of liquid nicotine (one capsule) used in electronic cigarettes and developed vomiting within 10 minutes of exposure. He immediately contacted an ambulance and was admitted within 30 minutes and received 3 g of activated charcoal. The patient also reported dizziness and he had slight hypertension and tachycardia. All symptoms resolved over the next 3 hours (Eberlein et al, 2014).
    b) A 24-year-old man was admitted with chest pain of 4 hours duration while using liquid nicotine. He had a 1-month history of using liquid tobacco containing 16 mg of nicotine daily (approximately equivalent to 1 pack of cigarettes) and prior to that he had a 4-year history of smoking one pack of cigarettes daily. An ECG showed ST segment elevation on leads DI, aVL and V1-6 with reciprocal ST segment depression and T-wave inversion on leads a VF, DII and DIII. An echocardiogram was consistent with anterior wall hypokinesis with an ejection fraction of 50%. A troponin level was 223 pg/mL (normal range: 0 to 14 pg/mL). A thrombus in the proximal left anterior descending artery was found on cardiac catheterization. Due to his age and no underlying health conditions, the patient was treated with tissue plasminogen activator which relieved his chest pain and the ECG showed a 70% resolution of ST elevation (Kivrak et al, 2014).
    2) TODDLER
    a) A 30-month old child was found with a nicotine refill cartridge (strength unknown) by her mother and it was uncertain if she had ingested any of the liquid. The child vomited a short time later. Upon admission, the child was asymptomatic and was observed for 6 hours and then discharged to home with no further reported symptoms (Gupta et al, 2014).
    c) CASE SERIES
    1) PEDIATRIC
    a) A retrospective review was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of children 6 years of age and less that were exposed to liquid nicotine. A total of 181 cases were identified between 2009 and 2015. Symptoms developed in 47 (26%) children. Vomiting (n=39) was the most common event, followed by drowsiness (n=8), pallor (n=6), tachycardia (n=5), hypertension (n=3), coughing/choking (n=3), agitation (n=3), oral irritation (n=2), and diaphoresis (n=2). Coma was reported in one case. In 41 cases, the onset of symptoms occurred with a mean time of 18 minutes (median time, 15 minutes). One child unexpectedly vomited 2 hours after having no symptoms. Of the 31 cases that documented the duration of symptoms, 7 were defined as brief, 13 had a duration of less than 60 minutes and 11 had symptoms for 60 minutes or longer (Wilcox & Elko, 2015).
    3) NICOTINE GUM
    a) Nicotine chewing gum has produced toxicity following chewing of one-half to 30 pieces in children or adults (Smolinske et al, 1988; Mensch & Holden, 1984; Rigotti & Eagle, 1986; Stewart & Catterall, 1985).
    4) NICOTINE TRANSDERMAL PATCH
    a) BUCCAL ABSORPTION: Severe toxicity (eg, hypertension, tachycardia, vasoconstriction) has occurred via buccal absorption of a single transdermal nicotine patch, Prostep(R); volunteers bit into the patch and retained it in their mouths for 60 seconds (Harchelroad et al, 1992).
    b) ADULT: Simultaneous application of 12 nicotine patches (21 mg per patch) in an adult resulted in sweating, pallor, nausea, dizziness, stupor, and obtundation within 2 hours (Woolf et al, 1996).
    c) PEDIATRIC: An 11-year-old boy placed 2 transdermal nicotine patches on his skin. He became symptomatic and recovered following a fluid bolus and atropine; he was asymptomatic within 4 hours. Children are unlikely to develop symptoms with an estimated absorbed dose of less than 0.1 mg/kg (Wain & Martin, 2004).
    5) NICOTINE SULFATE MIST
    a) 0.2 mg/cubic meter of nicotine sulfate mist is considered the minimal concentration for poisoning (ACGIH, 1986).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) TRANSDERMAL
    a) In a comparison study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of 2 nicotine transdermal systems (Habitrol(R) and Nicoderm(R) each to deliver 21 mg/day) in healthy male subjects (n=24), the 2 products were not found to be bioequivalent. The mean maximal nicotine plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 22.8 and 21.0 ng/mL were found to be similar after a single application. However, the mean time to maximal nicotine plasma concentration (Tmax) varied significantly between Nicoderm(R) (5.2 hr) and Habitrol(R) (9.8 hr) (Gupta et al, 1995).
    1) Likewise, the plasma cotinine concentrations for the 2 products were found to be similar after a single application, but the steady state kinetics were 10% lower for Habitrol(R) (290.5 ng/mL) compared to Nicoderm(R) (322.5 ng/mL). In addition, cotinine Tmax values for the 2 products were found to be similar after a single application (Gupta et al, 1995).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Nicotine is highly toxic. About 2 to 5 mg can cause nausea. The lethal oral dose for adults has been estimated to be approximately 40 to 60 mg (Malizia et al, 1983). Survival has been reported after ingestion of 1 to 4 g (Franke & Thomas, 1936).
    b) Ingestion of an unknown amount of nicotine alkaloid with a concentration of 870 mg/mL resulted in a fatal nicotine serum level of 13,600 nanograms (ng)/mL (Lavoie & Harris, 1991).
    c) COTININE: Vlachos et al (1992) reported concentration of cotinine in urine as high as 653 ng/mL at 3 hours after ingestion of cigarettes in a study of 20 infants. Mild symptoms (eg, vomiting, slightly elevated blood pressure, and tachycardia) were noted in 5 of 20 cases.
    d) LIQUID NICOTINE: A 34-year-old man, with a history of psychosis, was found dead by his family and 3 empty vials of liquid nicotine were found. There was no evidence of trauma and his postmortem exam was positive for nicotine. A remaining vial (brand Titanum Ice) was tested and found to contain a nicotine concentration of 74 mg/mL. The lethal dose calculated (based on 1 mg/kg body weight) for this patient was 72.5 mg nicotine, thus the patient could have ingested a single vial (containing 50 mL of 72 mg/mL) and would have ingested approximately 50 times as high as the estimated lethal dose (Bartschat et al, 2015).
    e) NICOTINE EXTRACT: Intentional ingestion of a nicotine extract (prepared by extracting 300 g of tobacco, producing an estimated 6780 mg of nicotine) by a 67-year-old man resulted in a peak serum concentration of nicotine and cotinine of 386 mcg/L and 9955 mcg/L, respectively. No permanent sequelae occurred. The authors suggested that the patient only absorbed a small portion of the extract, due to immediate vomiting. Residue of the extract was also found near the patient after ingestion (Schneider et al, 2009).
    f) TRANSDERMAL: Application of multiple nicotine patches in addition to smoking cigarettes resulted in a plasma nicotine level of 3.7 mcg/mL about 11 hours following a cardiac arrest in a 32-year-old man (Sanchez et al, 1996).
    g) TRANSDERMAL: Serum nicotine and cotinine levels were reported to be 27 ng/mL and 390 ng/mL, respectively, in a 37-year-old man after application of 12 nicotine patches (21 mg each) in an apparent suicide attempt (Woolf et al, 1996).
    h) CHILDREN: More severe symptoms occur in infants (younger than 1 year) than in older children. As little as 1 mg of nicotine (Goldfrank et al, 1998), or 0.2 mg/kg can produce symptoms in a small child (Wain & Martin, 2004). Children will probably not develop symptoms with an estimated absorbed dose of less than 0.1 mg/kg (Wain & Martin, 2004).
    i) Assuming that 1 cigarette contains a minimum of 13 mg, severe toxicity was seen after 1.4 to 1.9 mg/kg, mild toxicity after 0.2 to 1.8 mg/kg, and no toxicity after 0.3 to 1 mg/kg (Smolinske et al, 1988).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS54-11-5 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Nicotine
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.5 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): GI dam; CNS impair; card impair
    d) Molecular Weight: 162.23
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS54-11-5 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Nicotine
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 0.5 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s):
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 5 mg/m3
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS54-11-5 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Nicotine
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Nicotine
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS54-11-5 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Nicotine
    2) Table Z-1 for Nicotine:
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 0.5
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: Yes
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) NICOTINE
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 5900 mcg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 3340 mcg/kg
    3) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 16 mg/kg
    4) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 14,560 mcg/kg
    5) LD50- (INTRATRACHEAL)RAT:
    a) 19,300 mcg/kg
    6) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 50 mg/kg
    7) LD50- (SKIN)RAT:
    a) 140 mg/kg
    8) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    a) 25 mg/kg
    B) Nicotine sulfate
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 10,200 mcg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 8550 mcg/kg
    3) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 50 mg/kg
    4) LD50- (SKIN)RAT:
    a) 285 mg/kg

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Nicotine is an alkaloid available as a free volatile base or as a sulfate.
    B) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
    1) Physiologic effects include peripheral nervous system stimulation followed by depression of sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia and neuromuscular junctions.
    2) Central nervous system stimulation of respiration, stimulation of the medulla oblongata leading to vomiting and antidiuretic action.
    3) Stimulation followed by BLOCKADE of autonomic ganglia, inhibition of catecholamines, and subsequent CNS depression.
    C) OTHER
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Stimulation of sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla leading to release of catecholamines.
    2) GASTROINTESTINAL: Parasympathetic stimulation leading to increased tone and motor activity.

Physical Characteristics

    A) TASTE: Sharp, burning taste (Lewis, 1996)
    B) ODOR: Develops odor of pyridine (Budvari, 1996).
    C) COLOR: Nicotine is a colorless liquid that browns on contact with air and with age (OHM/TADS, 1997; Lewis, 1996).
    D) Thick, waterwhite alkaloid (pale yellow to dark brown) from tobacco, levorotatory oil turning brown on exposure to air (Lewis, 1996).
    E) Nicotine sulfate is a six-sided non-medicinal tablet or a white to light brown, odorless, crystalline solid. Liquid nicotine sulfate is a colorless, tobacco-odored solution of the crystals. Nicotine sulfate has a burning taste (AAR, 1994; CHRIS, 1997; OHM/TADS, 1997).
    F) Nicotine is also available as medicinal gum, trans-dermal patches, and nasal spray and is readily absorbed from the tobacco leaf by agricultural workers and by users of tobacco and snuff.
    G) Physical state at 15 degrees C and 1 ATM: Solid (CHRIS, 1997).

Ph

    A) 8.5
    B) SNUFF: 7.8 to 8.2
    C) NICOTINE GUM: 8.5

Molecular Weight

    A) 162.23

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    b) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g orally, as a slurry in water.
    c) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally, or magnesium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    d) Emesis may be dangerous, due to rapid onset of symptoms. Multiple-dose activated charcoal may be of use. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    b) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 L), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    c) Emesis may be dangerous, due to rapid onset of symptoms. Multiple-dose activated charcoal may be of use. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.

Clinical Effects

    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) Initial hyperexcitability, hyperpnea, salivation, vomiting, diarrhea, then depression, incoordination, and paralysis.

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    b) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g orally, as a slurry in water.
    c) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally, or magnesium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    d) Emesis may be dangerous, due to rapid onset of symptoms. Multiple-dose activated charcoal may be of use. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally, to adsorb the toxic agent.
    b) Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 L), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    c) Emesis may be dangerous, due to rapid onset of symptoms. Multiple-dose activated charcoal may be of use. Symptomatic care for hypotension or hypertension and for seizures should be given.

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1987.
    14) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 5th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1986.
    15) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    16) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    17) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    18) Abel El: Smoking and pregnancy. J Psychactive Drugs 1984; 16:327-338.
    19) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    20) Andersson G, Hansson E, & Schmiterlow CG: Gastric secretion of C14-nicotine. Experientia 1965; 15:211-213.
    21) Anon: MMWR Weekly: Bidi use among urban youth -- Massachusetts. CDC. Atlanta, GA, USA. 1999. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4836a2.htm.
    22) Anon: Prenancy categories for prescription drugs. FDA Drug Bulletin 1982; 12:24-25.
    23) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    24) Armitage AK, Dollery CT, & George CF: Absorption and metabolism of nicotine from cigarettes. Br Med J 1975; 4:313.
    25) BD Montgomery : Attorney General Montgomery calls for crackdown on bidi cigarettes - minors able to buy harmful tobacco products on internet (Press Release). State of Ohio, Office of the Attorney General. Columbus, OH. 1999. Available from URL: http//www.ag.state.oh.us/. As accessed Full URL is not active - 6/18/03.
    26) Babu S, Bhat RV, & Kumar PU: A comparative clinico-pathological study of oral submucous fibrosis in habitual chewers of pan masala and betelquid. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:317-322.
    27) Ballard T, Ehlers J, & Freund E: Green tobacco sickness: occupational nicotine poisoning in tobacco workers. Arch Environ Health 1995; 50:384-389.
    28) Bartschat S, Mercer-Chalmers-Bender K, Beike J, et al: Not only smoking is deadly: fatal ingestion of e-juice-a case report. Int J Legal Med 2015; 129(3):481-486.
    29) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 3rd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, IL, 1989, pp 591-594.
    30) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 4th ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, IL, 1995.
    31) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, PSG Publishing Company, Littleton, MA, 1988, pp 227-232.
    32) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    33) Benowitz NL & Gourlay SG: Cardiovascular toxicity of nicotine: Implications of nicotine replacement therapy. JACC 1997; 29:1422-1431.
    34) Benowitz NL, Jacob P III, & Savanapridi C: Determinants of nicotine intake while chewing nicotine polacrilex gum. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41:467-473.
    35) Benowitz NL, Jacob P, & Jones RT: Interindividual variability in the metabolism and cardiovascular effects of nicotine in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982; 221:368-372.
    36) Benowitz NL: Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction and therapeutics. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996; 36:597-613.
    37) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    38) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    39) Bonadio WA & Anderson Y: Tobacco ingestions in children (letter). Clin Pediatr 1989; 28:592-593.
    40) Borys DJ, Setzer SC, & Ling LJ: CNS depression in an infant after the ingestion of tobacco: a case report. Vet Hum Toxicol 1988; 30:20-22.
    41) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    42) Briggs GG, Freeman RK, & Yaffee SJ: Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: Williams & Wilkins: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk, 3rd ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1990.
    43) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    44) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    45) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 11th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1989.
    46) Bureau MA, Shapcott D, & Berthianme Y: Maternal cigarette smoking and fetal oxygen transport: a study of P50, 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, total hemoglobin, hematocrit, and type F hemoglobin in fetal blood. Pediatrics 1983; 72:22-26.
    47) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    48) Busto U, Bendayan R, & Sellers EM: Clinical pharmacokinetics of non-opiate abused drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989; 16:1-26.
    49) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    50) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    51) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    52) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    53) Chen BC , Bright SB , Trivedi AR , et al: Death following intentional ingestion of e-liquid. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(9):914-916.
    54) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    55) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    56) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    57) Clark PI, Gautam S, & Gerson LW: Effect of menthol cigarettes on biochemical markers of smoke exposure among black and white smokers. Chest 1996; 110:1194-1198.
    58) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Toxicology, 3rd ed, Vol 2A, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981.
    59) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Volume 2D. Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    60) Collins AC: An analysis of the addiction liability of nicotine. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse 1990; 9:83-101.
    61) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    62) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    63) Connolly GN, Winn DM, & Hecht SS: The reemergence of smokeless tobacco. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:1020-1027.
    64) Cope G, Nayyar P, & Holder R: A simple near-patient test for nicotine and its metabolites in urine to assess smoking habit. Clin Chim ACTA 1996; 256:135-149.
    65) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    66) Cutler AR, Wilkerson AE, & Gingras JL: Prenatal cocaine and/or nicotine exposure in rats: preliminary findings on long-term cognitive outcome and genital development at birth. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1996; 18:635-643.
    67) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    68) Dawber TR, Kannel WB, & Revotskie N: Some factors associated with the development of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 1959; 1349-1356.
    69) Doolittle DJ, Winegar R, & Lee CK: The genotoxic potential of nicotine and its major metabolites. Mutat Res 1995; 344:95-102.
    70) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    71) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    72) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    73) EPA: EPA chemical profile on nicotine sulfate, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1985.
    74) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    75) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    76) Eberlein CK, Frieling H, Kohnlein T, et al: Suicide attempt by poisoning using nicotine liquid for use in electronic cigarettes. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 171(8):891-.
    77) Ehrenfeld JR, Ong J, & Farino W: Controlling Volatile Emissions at Hazardous Waste Sites, Noyes Publication, Park Ridge, NJ, 1986, pp 393-401.
    78) Eliopoulos C, Klein J, & Phan MK: Hair concentrations of nicotine and cotinine in women and their newborn infants. JAMA 1994; 271:621-623.
    79) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    80) England L, Levine RJ, Mills JL, et al: Adverse pregnancy outcomes in snuff users. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:939-943.
    81) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    82) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    83) Faulkner JM: Nicotine poisoning by absorption through the skin. JAMA 1933; 100:1664-1665.
    84) Ferguson B, Wilson DJ, & Schaffner W: Determination of nicotine concentrations in breast milk. Am J Dis Child 1976; 130:837-839.
    85) Ferno O: A substitute for tobacco-smoking. Psychopharmacologica 1973; 31:201-204.
    86) Feyerabend C, Ings RMJ, & Russel MAH: Nicotine pharmacokinetics and its application to intake from smoking. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 19:239-247.
    87) Finkel AJ: Hamilton and Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wright, PSG Inc, Boston, MA, 1983, pp 387.
    88) Franke FE & Thomas JE: Treatment of acute nicotine poisoning. JAMA 1936; 106:507-512.
    89) Franke FE: Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1932; 29:1177-1179.
    90) Gehlbach SH, Williams WA, & Perry D: Nicotine absorption by workers harvesting green tobacco. lancet 1975; 1:478.
    91) Geng YM, Savage SM, & Johnson LJ: Effects of nicotine on the immune response. 1. Chronic exposure to nicotine impairs antigen receptor-mediated signal transduction in lymphocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1995; 135:268-278.
    92) Goepferd SJ: Smokeless tobacco: a potential hazard to infants and children. JADA 1986; 113:49-50.
    93) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    94) Gourlay SG, Benowitz NL, & Forbes A: Determinants of plasma concentrations of nicotine and cotinine during cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 51:407-414.
    95) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    96) Granella M, Priante E, & Nardini B: Excretion of mutagens, nicotine and its metabolites in urine cigarette smokers. Mutagenesis 1996; 11:207-211.
    97) Gritz ER, Baer-Weiss V, & Benowitz NL: Plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrations in habitual smokeless tobacco users. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30:201-209.
    98) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    99) Gupta S, Gandhi A, & Manikonda R: Accidental nicotine liquid ingestion: emerging paediatric problem. Arch Dis Child 2014; 99(12):1149.
    100) Gupta SK, Okerholm RA, Eller M, et al: Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two nicotine transdermal systems: nicoderm and habitrol. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35(5):493-498.
    101) Gyllensward A & Nordbring F: Tobacco poisoning with sino-auricular block. Acta Pediatr 1953; 42:356-359.
    102) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    103) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1993; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    104) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1996; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    105) Harchelroad F, Potts K, & Burdick J: Oral absorption of nicotine from transdermal therapeutic systems (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:332.
    106) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    107) Haruda F: "Hip-Pocket" sign in the diagnosis of nicotine poisoning (letter). Pediatrics 1989; 84:196.
    108) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 3rd ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1991.
    109) Hatsukami DK, Gust SW, & Keenan RM: Physiologic and subjective changes from smokeless tobacco withdrawal. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41:103-107.
    110) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    111) Henningfield JE: Nicotine medications for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(18):1196-203.
    112) Hibberd AR, O'Conner V, & Gorrod JW: Detection of nicotine, nicotine-1-N -oxide and continine in maternal and fetal body fluids. In: Gorrod JW (Ed): Biological Oxidation of Nitrogen, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978, pp 353-361.
    113) Hipke ME: Green tobacco sickness. South Med J 1993; 86:989-992.
    114) Hoffmann D, Djordjevic MV, & Brunnemann KD: New brands of oral snuff. Fd Chem Toxic 1991; 29:65-68.
    115) Hoffmann D, Harley NH, & Fisenne I: Carcinogenic agents in snuff. JNCI 1986; 76:435-437.
    116) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    117) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    118) Hughes JR & Miller SA: Nicotine gum to help stop smoking. JAMA 1984; 252:2855-2858.
    119) Hughes JR, Hatsukami DK, & Skoog KP: Physical dependence on nicotine in gum: a placebo substitution trial. JAMA 1986; 255:3277-3279.
    120) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    121) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    122) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    123) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    124) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    125) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    126) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    127) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    128) ILC Dover, Inc.: Chemical Compatibility Chart. ILC Dover, Inc.. Frederica, DE. 1998a. Available from URL: http://www.ilcdover.com/WebDocs/chart.pdf; http://www.ilcdover.com/Products/ProtSuits/Ready1/chart.htm. As accessed 12/15/2001.
    129) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    130) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1988.
    131) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    132) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    133) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    134) Ivey KJ & Trigg EJ: Absorption of nicotine the human stomach and its effect on gastric ion fluxes and potential difference. Am J Dig Dis 1978; 23:809-814.
    135) Johnson DW & Wilkins V: Ingestion of tobacco products by children: a prospective study (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:600.
    136) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    137) Kassem NO, Daffa RM, Liles S, et al: Children's exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke carcinogens and toxicants in homes of hookah smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16(7):961-975.
    138) Kermode AG, Plant GT, & Miller DH: Tobacco-alcohol amblyopia: magnetic resonance imaging findings (letter). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52:1447-1448.
    139) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    140) Kintz P & Mangin P: Evidence of gestational heroin or nicotine exposure by analysis of fetal hair. Forensic Sci Int 1993; 63:99-104.
    141) Kivrak T, Sunbul M, Durmus E, et al: Acute myocardial infarction due to liquid nicotine in a young man. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 8(1):32-34.
    142) Klein J, Forman R, & Eliopoulos C: A method for simultaneous measurement of cocaine and nicotine in neonatal hair. Ther Drug Monit 1994; 16:67-70.
    143) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    144) Kyerematen MS, Damiano MD, & Dvorchik BH: Smoking-induced changes in nicotine disposition: application of a new HPLC assay for nicotine and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 32:769-780.
    145) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    146) Landauer W: Nicotine-induced malformations of chicken embryos and their bearing on the phenocopy problem. J Exp Zool 1960; 143:107-122.
    147) Lavoie FW & Harris TM: Fatal nicotine ingestion. J Emerg Med 1991; 9:133-136.
    148) Lee LY, Gerhardstein DC, & Wang AL: Nicotine is responsible for airway irritation evoked by cigarette smoke inhalation in men. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75:1955-1961.
    149) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1993.
    150) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    151) Lowry JA: Electronic cigarettes: Another pediatric toxic hazard in the home?. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014; 52(5):449-450.
    152) Luck W & Nau H: Exposure to the fetus, neonate, and nursed infant to nicotine and cotinine from maternal smoking. N Eng J Med 1984; 311:672.
    153) Luck W & Nau H: Nicotine and cotinine concentrations in serum and milk of nursing smokers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1984a; 18:9-15.
    154) Luck W, Nau H, & Hansen R: Extent of nicotine and cotinine transfer to the human fetus, placenta and amniotic fluid of smoking mothers. Dev Pharmacol Ther 1985; 8:384-395.
    155) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    156) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    157) MMWR: Illness possibly associated with smoking clove cigarettes. MMWR: MMWR 1985; 34:297-299.
    158) Malizia E, Andreucci G, & Alfani F: Acute intoxication with nicotine alkaloids and cannabinoids in children from ingestion of cigarettes. Human Toxicol 1983; 2:315-316.
    159) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    160) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    161) Maridet C, Atge B, Amici JM, et al: The electronic cigarette: the new source of nickel contact allergy of the 21st century?. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73(1):49-50.
    162) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    163) Maritz GS, Woolward KM, & Dutoit G: Maternal nicotine exposure during pregnancy and development of emphysema-like damage in the offspring. S Afr Med J 1993; 83:195-198.
    164) McGee D , Brabson T , McCarthy J , et al: Four-year review of cigarette ingestions in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1995; 11(1):13-16.
    165) McGuigan MA: Nicotine. Clinical Toxicology Review. Massachusetts Poison Control System; 4(6), 1982.
    166) McKnight RH, Levine EJ, & Rodgers GC: Detection of green tobacco sickness by a regional poison center. Vet Human Toxicol 1994; 36:505-510.
    167) McNabb ME, Ebert RV, & McCusKer K: Plasma nicotine levels produced by chewing nicotine gum. JAMA 1982; 248:865-868.
    168) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    169) Mensch AR & Holden M: Nicotine overdose after a single piece of nicotine gum. Chest 1984; 86:801-802.
    170) Metzler W, Wronski R, & Bewig B: The lethal ingestion of cigarettes in adults: does it really exist? (article in German). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2005; 130(24):1491-1493.
    171) Montgomery SM & Ekbom A: Smoking during pregnancy and diabetes mellitus in a British longitudinal birth cohort. BMJ 2002; 324:26-27.
    172) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    173) Moore GF, Lydiatt D, & Massey J: Smokeless tobacco: questions of clinical significance. Nebr Med J 1986; 71:427-431.
    174) Morgan DP: Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings, 5th ed. EPA-540/9-88-001, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1993.
    175) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 11th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994.
    176) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    177) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    178) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    179) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    180) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    181) NRC: Drinking Water and Health, Volume 6, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1989.
    182) Nagda NL, Koontz MD, & Konheim AG: Measurement of cabin air quality aboard commercial airliners. Atmospher Environ Part A - Gen Top 1992; 26:2203-2210.
    183) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    184) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    234) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    235) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    236) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    237) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    238) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    239) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    240) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    241) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    242) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    243) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    244) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    245) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    246) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    247) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    248) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    249) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    250) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    251) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    252) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    253) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    254) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    255) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    256) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    257) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    258) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    259) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    260) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    261) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    262) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    263) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    264) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    265) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    266) Nemeth-Coslett R: Physiologic effects of nicotine polacrilex. Biomed Pharmacother 1989; 43:5-10.
    267) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    268) None Listed : From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ingestion of cigarettes and cigarette butts by children--Rhode Island, January 1994-July 1996. JAMA 1997; 277(10):785-786.
    269) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    270) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    271) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    272) Nyberg G, Panfilov V, & Sivertsson R: Cardiovascular effects of nicotine chewing gum in healthy non-smokers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 23:303-307.
    273) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    274) Oberst & McIntyre: Acute nicotine poisoning. Pediatrics 1953; 11:338-340.
    275) Palladino G, Adams JD, & Brunnemann KD: Snuff-dipping in college students: a clinical profile. Mil Med 1986; 151:342-346.
    276) Paulson RB, Shanfeld J, & Vorhees CV: Behavioral effects of smokeless tobacco on the neonate and young Sprague-Dawley rat. Teratology 1994; 49:293-305.
    277) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    278) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    279) Peder C, Crawford M, & Ravlo O: Tobaksforgiftning hos born. Ugeskrift For Laeger 1984; 146:1160-1161.
    280) Pereira CB, Strupp M, & Eggert T: Nicotine-induced nystagmus: Three-dimensional analysis and dependence on head position. Neurology 2000; 55:1563-1565.
    281) Perez-Stable EJ, Herrera B, & Jacob P: Nicotine metabolism and intake in black and white smokers. J Amer Med Assoc 1998; 280:152-156.
    282) Personal Communication: Personal Communication: Betty Bridges, RN. Fragranced Products Information Network (FPIN), 2000.
    283) Pickworth WB, Fant RV, & Butshcky MF: Effects of transdermal nicotine delivery on measures of acute nicotine withdrawal. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 279:450-456.
    284) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    285) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    286) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    287) Product Information: Nicoderm(R), nicotine transdermal system. Marion Merrel Dow, Kansas City, MO, 1992.
    288) Product Information: Nicorette(R), Nicotine polacrilex. Lakeside, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    289) Product Information: Nicotrol NS(R), nicotine nasal spray. McNeil Consumer Products, Fort Washington, PA, 1996.
    290) Product Information: Nicotrol(R) inhalation system, nicotine inhalation system. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co, New York, NY, 2008.
    291) Product Information: Nicotrol(R)NS nasal spray, nicotine nasal spray. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co, New York, NY, 2010.
    292) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    293) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    294) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    295) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    296) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    297) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    298) Rigotti NA & Eagle KA: Atrial fibrillation while chewing nicotine gum. JAMA 1986; 255:1018.
    299) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    300) Robinson SF, Marks MJ, & Collins AC: Inbred mouse strains vary in oral self- selection of nicotine. Psychopharmacol 1996; 124:332-339.
    301) Rogers AJ, Denk LD, & Wax PM: Catastrophic brain injury after nicotine insecticide ingestion. J Emerg Med 2004; 26(2):169-172.
    302) Rosenberg J, Benowitz NL, & Jacob P: Disposition kinetics and effects of intravenous nicotine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980; 28:517-522.
    303) Rosenweig M, Shavit S, & Korczyn AD: Nicotine mydriasis. Drug Alcohol Depend 1989; 23:133-136.
    304) Ross MP, Revolinski D, & Taurman L: Detection of a pediatric occupational poisoning in Kentucky (abstract). AAPCC Annual Meeting. Vet Hum Toxicol 1994a; 36:360.
    305) Ross MP, Revolinski D, & Taurman L: Green tobacco sickness among adults in Kentucky (abstract). AAPCC Annual Meeting. Vet Human Toxicol 1994b; 36:360.
    306) Russell MAH, Jarvis MJ, & Devitt G: Nicotine intake by snuff users. Br Med J 1981; 283:814-817.
    307) Ryan ML, Arnold TC, & Martinez M: Seizure following inadvertent application of a nicotine patch (abstract). J Tox Clin Tox 1999; 37:654.
    308) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    309) Salomon ME: Nicotine and Tobacco Preparations In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, et al (Eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp 1075-1084.
    310) Salomon ME: Nicotine and Tobacco Preparations. In:Flomenbaum NE, Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp 1221-1230.
    311) Sanchez P, Ducasse JL, & Lapeyre-Mestre M: Nicotine poisoning as a cause of cardiac arrest? (letter). Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:475-476.
    312) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 7th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1989.
    313) Schardein JL: Chemically Induced Birth Defects. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY, 1993.
    314) Schievelbein H: Nicotine, resorption and fate. Pharmacol Ther 1982; 18:233-248.
    315) Schneider S, Diederich N, Appenzeller B, et al: Internet suicide guidelines: report of a life-threatening poisoning using tobacco extract. J Emerg Med 2009; Epub:--.
    316) Schuette KH: Esophageal tumors in sheep: some ecological observations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968; 41:821-824.
    317) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    318) Sepkovic DW, Colosimo SG, & Axelrod CN: The delivery and uptake of nicotine from an aerosol rod. Am J Public Health 1986; 1343-1344.
    319) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    320) Shiffman SM, Gritz ER, & Maltese J: Effects of a cigarette smoking and oral nicotine on hand tremor. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 33:800-805.
    321) Shin VY & Cho CH: Nicotine and gastric cancer. Alcohol 2005; 35(3):259-264.
    322) Singer J & Janz T: Apnea and seizures caused by nicotine ingestion. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6:135-137.
    323) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985, pp 643-644.
    324) Slade J & Connolly G: Nicotine from aerosol rod (letter). Am J Public Health 1987; 77:1229.
    325) Slotkin TA, Greer N, & Faust J: Effects of maternal nicotine injections on brain development in the rat: ornithine decarboxylase activity, nucleic acids and proteins in discrete brain regions. Brain Res Bull 1986; 17:41-50.
    326) Slotkin TA, Saleh JL, & McCook EC: Impaired cardiac function during postnatal hypoxia in rats exposed to nicotine prenatally: implications for perinatal morbidity and mortality, and for sudden infant death syndrome. Teratology 1997; 55:177-184.
    327) Smolinske SC, Spoerke DG, & Spiller SK: Cigarette and nicotine chewing gum toxicity in children. Human Toxicol 1988; 7:27-31.
    328) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    329) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    330) Stewart PM & Catterall JR: Chronic nicotine ingestion and atrial fibrillation. Br Heart J 1985; 54:222-223.
    331) Svensson CK: Clinical pharmacokinetics of nicotine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 12:30-40.
    332) Swan GE, Habina K, & Means B: Saliva cotinine and recent smoking: evidence for a nonlinear relationship. Public Health Rep 1993; 108:779-783.
    333) Thornton SL, Oller L, & Sawyer T: Fatal intravenous injection of electronic nicotine delivery system refilling solution. J Med Toxicol 2014; 10(2):202-204.
    334) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    335) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    336) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    337) Tricker AR, Haubner R, & Spiegelhalder B: The occurrence of tobacco- specific nitrosamines in oral tobacco products and their potential formation under simulated gastric conditions. Fd Chem Toxic 1988; 26:861-865.
    338) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    339) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    340) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    341) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    342) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    343) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    344) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    345) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    346) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    347) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    348) Vanakoski J, Seppala T, & Sievi E: Exposure to high ambient temperature increases absorption and plasma concentrations of transdermal nicotine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60:308-315.
    349) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    350) Wain AA & Martin J: Can transdermal nicotine patch cause acute intoxication in a child? A case report and review of literature. Ulster Med J 2004; 73(1):65-66.
    351) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    352) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    353) West RJ & Russell MAH: Dependence on nicotine chewing gum (letter). JAMA 1986; 256:3214-3215.
    354) Wilcox M & Elko CJ: Symptom Timeline Documentation at a Poison Center: Pediatric Nicotine Solution Ingestion. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):749.
    355) Winn DM, Blot WJ, & Shy CM: Snuff dipping and oral cancer among women of the Southern United States. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:745-749.
    356) Woolf A, Burkhart K, & Caraccio T: Self-poisoning among adults using multiple transdermal nicotine patches. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:691-698.
    357) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    358) Wright LN, Thorp JM, & Kuller JA: Transdermal nicotine replacement in pregnancy: maternal pharmacokinetics and fetal effects. Am J Obster Gynecol 1997; 176:1090-1094.
    359) Yen KL, Hechavarria E, & Bostwick SB: Bidi cigarettes: An emerging threat to adolescent health. Arch Pediatr Adoles Med 2000; 154:1187-1189.
    360) de Boer AG, Moolenaar F, & de Leede LGJ: Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 1982; 7:285-311.
    361) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    362) deBethizy JD, Robinson JH, & Davis RA: Absorption of nicotine from a cigarette that does not burn tobacco. Pharmacology 1988; 37:328-332.
    363) van de Kamp JL & Collins AC: Prenatal nicotine alters nicotinic receptor development in the mouse brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994; 47:889-900.