MOBILE VIEW  | 

NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction that occurs with use of neuroleptic drugs, dopamine antagonists or from withdrawal of dopamine agonists in patients with idiopathic parkinsonism (Granner & Wooten, 1991; Nierenberg et al, 1991).
    B) Controversial whether NMS is a distinct diagnostic entity, with unique etiology and pathogenesis, or simply an extreme form of extrapyramidal symptoms that are exacerbated by a variety of concurrent medical problems (Pope et al, 1986; Levinson & Simpson, 1986).

Specific Substances

    1) NMS
    2) AHR-3070C
    3) ICI-204, 636
    4) METACLOPRAMIDE (MISSPELLING OF METOCLOPRAMIDE)

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) SOURCES: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening syndrome that occurs almost exclusively with the use of antipsychotic medications. Most cases of NMS occur with therapeutic use of these agents, not after overdose.
    B) PATHOGENESIS: Likely results from rapid reductions in dopaminergic neurotransmission in the CNS, either by treatment with a dopamine receptor antagonist or by withdrawal of a dopamine agonist.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: NMS occurs in approximately 1% of patients receiving antipsychotics, and the mortality has been reported to be as high as 30%. NMS is more likely to occur with high-potency antipsychotics such as haloperidol, but has been reported to occur with virtually every antipsychotic.
    D) AT RISK: Male patients, younger patients, or those starting therapy with an antipsychotic (ie, in particular high potency antipsychotics), cotreatment with lithium, use of multiple drugs in combination, dehydration, use of depot preparations, rapid dose escalation, and patients requiring restraint have all been associated with an increased risk to develop NMS.
    E) CLINICAL EFFECTS: The diagnosis of NMS is clinical. Manifestations include altered mental status (ie, delirium, confusion, CNS depression) neuromuscular abnormalities (ie, lead pipe rigidity, cogwheeling, dysarthria, parkinsonian manifestations, tremor, dystonia, dysphagia, choreiform movements), hyperthermia (may be severe), and autonomic dysfunction (ie, tachycardia, diaphoresis, incontinence, respiratory depression, hypertension, hypotension, and dysrhythmias). Laboratory abnormalities include rhabdomyolysis, acidosis, renal failure, elevated aminotransferases, hyponatremia, leukocytosis, myoglobinuria, and coagulopathy. Aspiration pneumonia may develop.
    F) ONSET: Signs and symptoms generally evolve over a number of days and typically occur within 2 weeks of beginning treatment, but may develop in a patient on long-term antipsychotic therapy, most often after the addition of a new antidopaminergic agent or a dose increase. It may also develop after abrupt, cessation of dopaminergic agent (typically in a patient with Parkinson disease).
    G) PRESENTATION: It may be atypical or incomplete; fewer than 50% of cases manifest with classic symptoms. Diagnosis often missed or delayed because of similarity to other organic and psychiatric disorders. TYPICAL: Usually evolves within days of initial symptoms; labile vital signs may precede syndrome by 3 to 5 days, with rapid progression to full-blown course in 24 to 72 hours.
    0.2.4) HEENT
    A) DROOLING: Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Hypertonic involvement of pharyngeal muscles results in increased salivation, which may contribute to dehydration, and dysarthria has also been observed (Smego & Durack, 1982; Kurlan et al, 1984).
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Tachypnea is common. Muscular rigidity in the thorax region may lead to hypoventilation requiring ventilatory support.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Mental status changes are the first effects observed, followed sequentially by muscular rigidity, hyperthermia, and autonomic dysfunction. Mental status changes are frequently present and range from agitation and rage to stupor or coma. A broad range of movement disorders (ie, parkinsonism) can occur; disorders of swallowing and speech may also be present.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Dysphagia is a relatively common in NMS patients.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Urinary incontinence secondary to autonomic dysfunction is relatively common. Acute myoglobinuric renal failure has been associated with NMS.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) Dehydration is a common finding in NMS patients, along with electrolyte abnormalities.
    0.2.13) HEMATOLOGIC
    A) Hypoferremia is commonly observed in patients with NMS.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Profuse diaphoresis secondary to autonomic dysfunction is common.
    0.2.15) MUSCULOSKELETAL
    A) Severe generalized muscle rigidity is characteristic of NMS (ie, "lead pipe" rigidity similar to findings with severe Parkinson disease). It develops shortly before or concomitantly with onset of fever. Rhabdomyolysis is a relatively common complication of NMS.
    0.2.18) PSYCHIATRIC
    A) Agitation, anxiety, which can progress to stupor, and coma have been observed.
    0.2.22) OTHER
    A) A differential diagnosis may include idiosyncratic drug reactions, withdrawal syndromes, organophosphate exposure, and malignant hyperthermia.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) No laboratory studies will confirm the diagnosis of NMS.
    B) Monitor mental status and vital signs; continuous monitoring of core temperature is advised.
    C) Monitor serum chemistry, renal function, creatinine kinase, CBC, liver enzymes or venous or arterial blood gases, urinalysis and urine output.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) CLINICAL MANAGEMENT
    1) Treatment is primarily supportive. Administer oxygen. Airway and respiratory support should be provided as needed. Hypotension should first be treated with intravenous fluids followed by vasopressors as needed. Any dopamine antagonists should be discontinued. If the NMS was precipitated by the withdrawal of a dopamine agonist, it should be reinstituted immediately. Hyperthermia should be treated aggressively with control of agitation and muscle rigidity and active cooling measures, such as evaporative cooling or ice water bath submersion for severe cases.
    B) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Neuroleptic malignant syndrome usually occurs in the setting of chronic use, there is no role for decontamination.
    C) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with an altered mental status, comatose, and those requiring neuromuscular paralysis to control rigidity need orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
    D) NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME
    1) PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY: BENZODIAZEPINES are the first-line treatment and should be given to control neuromuscular agitation. Barbiturates can also be used to control agitation. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates decrease sympathetic output by increasing GABA mediated chloride transport. In severe cases, propofol infusions and/or muscle paralysis may be required to control agitation or rigidity. Aggressive control of agitation and rigidity are necessary to prevent or reverse hyperthermia. Other pharmacologic agents have not been systematically well studied, but they have limited toxicity and anecdotal evidence suggests they may be effective, so their use should be considered, especially in severely ill patients. BROMOCRIPTINE (a centrally acting dopamine agonist) has been used at doses of 2.5 to 10 mg orally {or via nasogastric tube} 3 to 4 times per day; if response is inadequate, increase dose by 2.5 mg every 24 hours until a response or until reaching a maximum dose of 45 mg/day. It is usually maintained for at least 10 days to treat NMS for patient's exposed to oral neuroleptics and 2 to 3 weeks for depot neuroleptics. Early discontinuation may result in relapse. DANTROLENE (which reduces skeletal muscle activity) has also been used with varying degrees of success. INTRAVENOUS: It can be given via the intravenous route at an initial dose of 1 to 2.5 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg every 6 hours up to a maximum dose of 10 mg/kg/day. ORAL: Oral dantrolene can be used in less severe cases or to taper the dose following initial IV therapy after several days. An oral dose can range from 50 to 200 mg/day. It should be noted that dantrolene is effective for malignant hyperthermia, which shares some similarities with NMS, but dantrolene has not been proven to be effective in treating NMS. It can also be hepatotoxic at levels above 10 mg/kg/day.
    E) HYPERTHERMIA
    1) Hyperthermia should be treated aggressively with control of agitation and muscle rigidity and active cooling measures, such as evaporative cooling (disrobe the patient, keep skin damp with lukewarm water and promote air circulating with fans) or ice water bath submersion for severe cases. Antipyretics are of no benefit.
    F) ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY
    1) Electroconvulsive therapy has been reported to dramatically improve NMS, but is not well studied and should be reserved for patients with treatment resistant NMS.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: There is no role for home management of suspected NMS.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: All patients in which there is a concern for NMS should be admitted to a critical care setting.
    3) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in the management of NMS.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Non-neuroleptic dopamine antagonists (eg, metoclopramide) have been associated with NMS. Bromocriptine may worsen serotonin syndrome and should generally be avoided if the diagnosis of NMS is not certain.
    I) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) The differential diagnosis includes sepsis, malignant hyperthermia, serotonin syndrome, anticholinergic crisis, sympathomimetic crisis, and environmental heat stroke.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) The development of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) occurs in 1 of 2 pharmacologic settings: administration of drugs that block dopamine receptors in the central nervous system, and sudden cessation or reduction of dopamine agonists in patients with idiopathic parkinsonism.
    B) Decreasing incidence has been reported and may be the result of improved awareness and treatment.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) SOURCES: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening syndrome that occurs almost exclusively with the use of antipsychotic medications. Most cases of NMS occur with therapeutic use of these agents, not after overdose.
    B) PATHOGENESIS: Likely results from rapid reductions in dopaminergic neurotransmission in the CNS, either by treatment with a dopamine receptor antagonist or by withdrawal of a dopamine agonist.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: NMS occurs in approximately 1% of patients receiving antipsychotics, and the mortality has been reported to be as high as 30%. NMS is more likely to occur with high-potency antipsychotics such as haloperidol, but has been reported to occur with virtually every antipsychotic.
    D) AT RISK: Male patients, younger patients, or those starting therapy with an antipsychotic (ie, in particular high potency antipsychotics), cotreatment with lithium, use of multiple drugs in combination, dehydration, use of depot preparations, rapid dose escalation, and patients requiring restraint have all been associated with an increased risk to develop NMS.
    E) CLINICAL EFFECTS: The diagnosis of NMS is clinical. Manifestations include altered mental status (ie, delirium, confusion, CNS depression) neuromuscular abnormalities (ie, lead pipe rigidity, cogwheeling, dysarthria, parkinsonian manifestations, tremor, dystonia, dysphagia, choreiform movements), hyperthermia (may be severe), and autonomic dysfunction (ie, tachycardia, diaphoresis, incontinence, respiratory depression, hypertension, hypotension, and dysrhythmias). Laboratory abnormalities include rhabdomyolysis, acidosis, renal failure, elevated aminotransferases, hyponatremia, leukocytosis, myoglobinuria, and coagulopathy. Aspiration pneumonia may develop.
    F) ONSET: Signs and symptoms generally evolve over a number of days and typically occur within 2 weeks of beginning treatment, but may develop in a patient on long-term antipsychotic therapy, most often after the addition of a new antidopaminergic agent or a dose increase. It may also develop after abrupt, cessation of dopaminergic agent (typically in a patient with Parkinson disease).
    G) PRESENTATION: It may be atypical or incomplete; fewer than 50% of cases manifest with classic symptoms. Diagnosis often missed or delayed because of similarity to other organic and psychiatric disorders. TYPICAL: Usually evolves within days of initial symptoms; labile vital signs may precede syndrome by 3 to 5 days, with rapid progression to full-blown course in 24 to 72 hours.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) SUMMARY: Hyperpyrexia (temperature 38 to 42 degrees C) is a hallmark feature; tachycardia, BP abnormalities, and tachypnea are also common.
    1) DEFINITION: High temperature without other obvious source is a hallmark feature; usually follows rigidity and autonomic changes anywhere from hours to days (Balzan, 1998; Levenson, 1985; Granner & Wooten, 1991; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) (Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991c) (Addonizio et al, 1987a; Modestin et al, 1992).
    2) RANGE: Body temperature may elevate sharply, typically in range of 38.5 to 42 degrees C, resulting in profuse diaphoresis (Levenson, 1985; Granner & Wooten, 1991; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    3) COMPLICATIONS: Dehydration and acute renal failure (Levenson, 1985; Granner & Wooten, 1991; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989); in severe cases, may cause irreversible brain damage, coma, and death (Caroff & Mann, 1993).
    4) PATHOGENESIS: Due primarily to altered thermoregulation secondary to central dopaminergic blockade in the hypothalamus. Also may be generated in part by increased heat production (from muscle contraction) and decreased heat transfer (vasoconstriction). Direct muscle toxicity appears to have little role (Granner & Wooten, 1991) (Scheider, 1991).
    5) ATYPICAL
    a) Rarely, fever may be absent, which may delay recognition and treatment of NMS (Nierenberg et al, 1991)but is not unusual for fever to present late in the course of the syndrome (Velamoor, 1994) (Modestin et al, 1992).
    b) Neuroleptics themselves can produce drug fever in the absence of full-blown NMS. In febrile patients with mild drug-induced parkinsonism, further evaluation is prudent (to evaluate and treat as indicated for NMS) (Granner & Wooten, 1991).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPERTENSION
    1) Hypothalamic malfunction frequently results in hypertension or labile BP control; noted in 35% to 45% of cases (Rosenberg & Green, 1989; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    2) Classic criteria includes BP fluctuations greater than 30 mmHg systolic or greater than 15 mmHg diastolic (greater than 150/100 or less than 90/60 mmHg) (Nierenberg et al, 1991; Adityanjee, 1988).
    3) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of diastolic hypertension may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    B) HYPOTENSION
    1) Occasionally, hypothalamic malfunction may result in hypotension (Levenson, 1985; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989). It may be associated with dehydration (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    2) Classic criteria includes BP fluctuations of greater than 30 mmHg systolic or greater than 15 mmHg diastolic (greater than 150/100 or less than 90/60 mmHg) (Nierenberg et al, 1991).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) TACHYCARDIA can result from autonomic instability; noted in 75% to 100% of patients; typically greater than 130 beats per minute (Nierenberg et al, 1991; Adityanjee, 1988; Rosenberg & Green, 1989; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) (Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991c) (Addonizio et al, 1987a).

Heent

    3.4.1) SUMMARY
    A) DROOLING: Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Hypertonic involvement of pharyngeal muscles results in increased salivation, which may contribute to dehydration, and dysarthria has also been observed (Smego & Durack, 1982; Kurlan et al, 1984).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) Cardiovascular complications that may occur as a result of NMS are as follows: cardiovascular collapse, dysrhythmias, and myocardial infarction (Brady et al, 2001).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Tachypnea is common. Muscular rigidity in the thorax region may lead to hypoventilation requiring ventilatory support.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TACHYPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachypnea is a result of autonomic instability; noted in 25% to 50% of patients (Kurlan et al, 1984) (Rosenberg & Green, 1989).
    b) Patients often will have respiratory compromise, with rapid respirations (greater than 25/min) and hypoventilation, which may require ventilatory support (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Nierenberg et al, 1991; Adityanjee, 1988).
    B) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Patients may present with respiratory problems, including severe dyspnea (Nierenberg et al, 1991).
    b) Dyspnea may lead to respiratory insufficiency and cyanosis (Caroff & Mann, 1993).
    C) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Patients often will have respiratory compromise, with tachypnea and hypoventilation, which may require ventilatory support (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    b) Causes of respiratory failure include aspiration pneumonia, tachypneic hypoventilation, and infection; these conditions can frequently result in death (Smego & Durack, 1982; Guze & Baxter, 1985; Levenson, 1985; Rosenberg & Green, 1989) (Brady et al, 2001).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Mental status changes are the first effects observed, followed sequentially by muscular rigidity, hyperthermia, and autonomic dysfunction. Mental status changes are frequently present and range from agitation and rage to stupor or coma. A broad range of movement disorders (ie, parkinsonism) can occur; disorders of swallowing and speech may also be present.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ALTERED MENTAL STATUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: Altered sensorium (ie, confusion, clouding of consciousness, disorientation, mutism, stupor, or coma) is 1 of the cardinal signs; noted in 75% to 97% of cases (Kurlan et al, 1984; Caroff & Mann, 1993; Caroff et al, 1991). May be due to blockade of corticolimbic dopaminergic transmission, fever itself, or secondary metabolic acidosis (Granner & Wooten, 1991).
    b) Diagnosis should be suspected in patients receiving neuroleptic drugs who develop altered consciousness associated with high fever (Nierenberg et al, 1991; Adityanjee, 1988).
    c) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of disorientation may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    B) DISORDER OF AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Autonomic dysfunction is a characteristic feature of NMS. Fever, tachycardia, diaphoresis, and labile BP occur frequently; tachypnea and urinary incontinence occur occasionally; respiratory stridor, pallor, flushing, and urinary retention occur rarely (Nierenberg et al, 1991; Kurlan et al, 1984; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    b) PATHOLOGY: May result from inhibition of thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow and subsequent increased sympathetic tone (Lindvall, 1983).
    c) Occasionally, patients may present with atypical or incomplete NMS, including lack of obvious autonomic dysregulation (eg, mild tachycardia and sweating without marked abnormalities in BP) (Nierenberg et al, 1991).
    C) EXTRAPYRAMIDAL SIGN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) MOVEMENT DISORDER
    1) PARKINSONISM: Extrapyramidal motor disorder is a cardinal feature. Parkinsonism is the predominant movement disorder; associated with a broad range of movement disorders, primarily akinesia, dyskinesia, and hypertonicity (Granner & Wooten, 1991; Pope et al, 1986; Kurlan et al, 1984; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    2) Severe diffuse muscular ("lead pipe") rigidity develops in almost all cases, with onset shortly before or concomitantly with onset of fever; often associated with resting tremor. Contributes to increased heat production and vasoconstriction (Schneider, 1991; Granner & Wooten, 1991).
    3) Sialorrhea, bradykinesia, and festinating gait also may be observed (Kurlan et al, 1984; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    4) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of cogwheeling and rigidity may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    5) OTHER symptoms include babinski's sign, seizure, dystonia, choreiform movements, oculogyric crisis, opisthotonos, trismus, and flexor-extensor posturing (Granner & Wooten, 1991; Nierenberg et al, 1991; Keck et al, 1989; Kurlan et al, 1984; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) Brady et al, 2001).
    D) NEUROLOGICAL FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: Nonlethal permanent sequelae (eg, residual myoclonus or dystonia, dysarthria, dysphagia) occur in up to 20% of NMS patients (Shalev & Munitz, 1986; Pope et al, 1986).
    b) Cerebellar degeneration has been reported in a woman with NMS and bipolar disorder (Lal et al, 1997).
    E) AT RISK - FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In general, NMS does not occur as a uniform presentation of clinical signs and symptoms, but some authors have suggested that dopamine blocking plays a role in NMS pathogenesis in elderly patients with Parkinson disease (PD). In one study, PD patients with central dopaminergic hypoactivity were more susceptible to NMS, despite appropriate antiparkinsonian medications. The precise mechanism, however, remains unclear (Ueda et al, 1999).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Dysphagia is a relatively common in NMS patients.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPHAGIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Hypertonic involvement of pharyngeal muscles results in dysphagia, which can make oral intake of food or medications difficult (Keck et al, 1987; Smego & Durack, 1982). It is observed in about 40% of patients (Kurlan et al, 1984).
    b) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of dysphagia may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    B) EXCESSIVE SALIVATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Hypertonic involvement of pharyngeal muscles results in increased salivation, which may contribute to dehydration (Smego & Durack, 1982); noted in about 30% of cases (Kurlan et al, 1984).
    b) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of drooling may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Urinary incontinence secondary to autonomic dysfunction is relatively common. Acute myoglobinuric renal failure has been associated with NMS.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) URINARY INCONTINENCE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Incontinence may be present as a result of autonomic dysfunction; observed in 15% to 60% of NMS cases (Nierenberg et al, 1991; Pope et al, 1986; Levenson, 1985; Kurlan et al, 1984; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) (Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991c).
    B) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute renal failure (ARF) has been reported in some cases of NMS. Etiology appears to be predominantly due to rhabdomyolysis (Levenson, 1985); rhabdomyolysis and associated acute myoglobinuric renal failure are strong predictors of fatal outcome; presence of ARF increases mortality 3 to 4 times (Shalev et al, 1989).

Hematologic

    3.13.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hypoferremia is commonly observed in patients with NMS.
    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SERUM IRON LOW
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pronounced hypoferremia usually occurs in cases of NMS. Levels below normal range (less than 10 mcmol/L) have been noted in 95% of patients. Serum iron decreased precipitously from a mean of 15 mcmol/L before NMS to 6 mcmol/L after onset (mean drop, 60%) and returned to normal upon resolution of NMS (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991b).
    1) These findings suggest that extremely low serum iron levels occurring during NMS do not precede the episode but are specific to the disorder itself. Sudden decrease of serum iron by an as yet unidentified initiating factor may contribute to clinical presentation of NMS by interfering with dopamine D2 receptor function (Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991b).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Profuse diaphoresis secondary to autonomic dysfunction is common.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) EXCESSIVE SWEATING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Diaphoresis is a result of autonomic instability; noted in more than 50% of cases (Levenson, 1985; Rosenberg & Green, 1989; Nierenberg et al, 1991; Addonizio et al, 1987a; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    b) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, the presence of diaphoresis may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    c) Diaphoresis may be absent in patients taking anticholinergic drugs.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.1) SUMMARY
    A) Severe generalized muscle rigidity is characteristic of NMS (ie, "lead pipe" rigidity similar to findings with severe Parkinson disease). It develops shortly before or concomitantly with onset of fever. Rhabdomyolysis is a relatively common complication of NMS.
    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MUSCLE RIGIDITY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe, diffuse skeletal muscular "lead pipe" or "plastic" rigidity is a cardinal feature, observed in almost all cases; usually confined to extremities but occasionally may affect smooth muscle and involve swallowing, speaking, and breathing (Granner & Wooten, 1991; Nierenberg et al, 1991; Smego & Durack, 1982; Rosenberg & Green, 1989; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Addonizio et al, 1987a).
    b) Develops before or concomitantly with onset of fever; often associated with resting tremor (Velamoor et al, 1994; Modestin et al, 1992; Granner & Wooten, 1991; Nierenberg et al, 1991; Smego & Durack, 1982; Rosenberg & Green, 1989; Addonizio et al, 1987a).
    c) Centrally mediated; probably results from striatal dopamine receptor blockade; contributes to increased heat production and vasoconstriction (Kaufman, 1987).
    d) In acutely ill patients with NMS-like symptoms, presence of cogwheeling and rigidity may favor a diagnosis of NMS (Sewell & Jeste, 1992).
    B) INCREASED MUSCLE TONE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) DYSARTHRIA: Occasionally, muscle rigidity may affect smooth muscle. Hypertonic involvement of pharyngeal muscles may result in dysarthria (Smego & Durack, 1982); noted in about 20% of cases (Kurlan et al, 1984).
    C) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Most common serious complication of NMS, occurring in about 25% of cases (Levenson, 1985). It may occur along with severe muscle rigidity; produces extremely high CPK levels, hyperkalemia, myoglobinuria, and possible renal failure (Levenson, 1985).
    b) Rhabdomyolysis and associated renal failure are strongest predictors of fatal outcome (50% mortality risk) (Shalev et al, 1989).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) No laboratory studies will confirm the diagnosis of NMS.
    B) Monitor mental status and vital signs; continuous monitoring of core temperature is advised.
    C) Monitor serum chemistry, renal function, creatinine kinase, CBC, liver enzymes or venous or arterial blood gases, urinalysis and urine output.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) HEMATOLOGY
    1) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential. Typical finding: WBC: Leukocytosis in range of 12,000 to 30,000/mm(3) with or without shift to left is common, but nonspecific.
    B) BIOCHEMISTRY
    1) Obtain a baseline for CPK, magnesium, calcium levels; liver, renal, and thyroid function tests; toxicology screen to rule out other diseases rather than confirm diagnosis of NMS.
    2) CPK: Usually elevated to greater than 3 times normal; levels up to 20,000 units/L; reflects skeletal muscle damage.
    3) ELECTROLYTES: Hypocalcemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphotemia and either hypo- or hypernatremia are often present; may be associated with myoglobinuric renal failure, but most commonly reflect dehydration (Gratz et al, 1992) Brady et al, 2001).
    4) ACID/BASE BALANCE: Obtain a baseline ABG and repeat as indicated if evidence of metabolic acidosis; abnormalities are present in 75% of patients (Caroff & Mann, 1993).
    5) MICROBIOLOGY: A standard fever workup, including throat, urine, and blood cultures, should be performed to rule out infection (Keck et al, 1989; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    6) LIVER FUNCTION TESTS: Obtain baseline liver function studies; elevated transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase are possible, but do NOT appear associated with hepatic dysfunction (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) Brady et al, 2001).
    7) IRON LEVELS: Pronounced hypoferremia occurs in nearly all episodes of NMS; may be an important biochemical marker for NMS and can assist as an adjunct in diagnosis (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Rosenbush & Mazurek, 1991).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) Obtain a baseline urinalysis, observe for evidence of myoglobinuria, which can be present in up to two-thirds of cases, reflecting severe myonecrosis; enhances risk of acute renal failure (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989).
    2) Monitor urine output.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) LUMBAR PUNCTURE
    a) An LP, with Gram stain, cultures, cell counts, and chemistries, is mandatory when considering the diagnosis of NMS to rule out infectious cause of fever, altered consciousness, and motor signs (Granner & Wooten, 1991).
    b) Cerebrospinal fluid usually is normal in NMS, although a mild protein elevation may be present (Levenson, 1985; Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Addonizio et al, 1987a). Clinically, this indicates that a central organic etiology, unrelated to drug treatment, is responsible for signs and symptoms (Caroff et al, 1991).
    2) EEG
    a) An electroencephalogram is NOT diagnostic; may be normal or may show diffuse slowing (Caroff & Mann, 1993).

Radiographic Studies

    A) RADIOGRAPHY
    1) A standard fever work-up, including chest x-ray, should be performed to rule out an underlying infectious process (Keck et al, 1989).
    B) CT SCAN
    1) COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, HEAD
    a) A CT is indicated to rule out other causes of altered mentation (eg, SAH, brain abscess, or another infectious process).
    b) CT is normal in the majority of cases of NMS (Caroff & Mann, 1993).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All patients in which there is a concern for NMS should be admitted to a critical care setting.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) There is no role for home management of suspected NMS.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in the management of NMS.

Monitoring

    A) No laboratory studies will confirm the diagnosis of NMS.
    B) Monitor mental status and vital signs; continuous monitoring of core temperature is advised.
    C) Monitor serum chemistry, renal function, creatinine kinase, CBC, liver enzymes or venous or arterial blood gases, urinalysis and urine output.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Discontinue offending drug(s); initiate prompt supportive care (eg, hydration, rapid cooling measures), and stabilize respiratory, renal, and cardiac systems. Specific drug therapies (ie, muscle relaxants, dopamine agonists) need to be adjusted as necessary to treat signs and symptoms. Combination therapy may be necessary in refractory cases.
    2) Immediately stop ALL medications with known or suspected dopaminergic blocking properties However, if NMS is suspected to be secondary to recent withdrawal of dopaminergic medication, therapy with these agents should be reinstated (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Granner & Wooten, 1991; (Fink, 2001)). Supportive treatment includes cooling measures to promote heat dissipation. Other measures require restoration of fluid and electrolyte balance and aggressive pharmacologic treatment ((Fink, 2001)).
    3) BENZODIAZEPINES: Benzodiazepines (usually lorazepam) are considered the first-line of therapy in the treatment of NMS. They can be beneficial due to their rapid onset, especially in patients with agitation and restlessness. Therapy is nonspecific but it may have a role in attenuating the sympathetic hyperactivity that is observed with NMS (Juurlink, 2011; Wysokinski, 2012).
    4) Many of the therapies described below have not been studied using well-designed methodologies; many have been proposed based on single case reports. Therefore, clear treatment recommendations are not possible. Management of NMS focuses primarily on supportive care (Carbone, 2000).
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) No laboratory studies will confirm the diagnosis of NMS.
    2) Monitor mental status and vital signs; continuous monitoring of core temperature is advised.
    3) Monitor serum chemistry, renal function, creatinine kinase, CBC, liver enzymes or venous or arterial blood gases, urinalysis and urine output.
    C) REHYDRATION THERAPY
    1) Assess clinical status to determine magnitude of dehydration. Assuming normal renal function: NS or LR is used initially as a 1- to 2-liter bolus over 30 to 60 minutes in a moderately dehydrated patient. Slow response may require an additional bolus of up to one liter in the subsequent 30 minutes. CVP monitoring may be necessary to follow additional fluid replacement. Swan-Ganz catherization for pulmonary artery pressure monitoring is recommended in elderly patients with cardiac, pulmonary, or renal dysfunction.
    D) COOLING THE PATIENT
    1) Vigorous treatment with cooling blankets, mist and fan technique, tepid sponging; continuous venovenous hemofiltration for hyperthermia unresponsive to other measures.
    a) PERITONEAL LAVAGE: Iced saline (2 liters) via peritoneal lavage has been used successfully to treat hyperthermia unresponsive to conventional methods (Horowitz, 1989).
    b) ICED BATH IMMERSION: In cases of severe hyperpyrexia (greater than 41.1 degrees C), iced bath immersion may be required (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Schneider, 1991).
    c) DURATION: To avoid hypothermia, cooling measures should be discontinued when the patient's temperature reaches 38.5 degrees C; normothermia should be reached in 45 to 60 minutes (Graham et al, 1986).
    d) CONTINUOUS VENOVENOUS HEMOFILTRATION with cooling of extracorporeal system has been successful in decreasing temperature refractory to other treatments in NMS (Perez-Vela et al, 1996).
    e) OTHER: Measures such as colonic lavage and dialysis have been reported anecdotally, but have NOT been evaluated critically and are NOT recommended.
    f) Pharmacologic Agents:
    1) ANTIPYRETICS
    a) Although antipyretics generally do not have a role in the treatment of conditions attributable to imbalance between heat generation and heat dissipation, they may be indicated in NMS (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991b).
    b) Some data suggest that NMS may be a form of the acute phase reaction, many features of which are mediated by prostaglandin E2, which can be inhibited by salicylates and acetaminophen (Rosebush & Mazurek, 1991b).
    c) RECOMMENDED DOSE: ADULT: Aspirin or Acetaminophen 650 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours; rectal suppositories may be considered if unable to take orally.
    2) VASODILATORS
    a) NITROPRUSSIDE/INDICATIONS: May be beneficial in patients with significant or refractory peripheral vasoconstriction contributing to hyperthermia; may decrease temperature via increase in heat loss through the skin (Schneider, 1991; Blue et al, 1986).
    b) RECOMMENDATION: ADULT: Begin intravenous infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min and titrate to desired effect; up to 10 mcg/kg/min may be required (American Heart Association, 2005). PEDIATRIC: Initial: 0.5 to 1 microgram/kilogram/minute; titrate to effect up to 8 mcg/kg/min (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) PRECAUTIONS: Contraindicated in patients taking sildenafil (Viagra(R)) and in the treatment of compensatory hypertension (ie, arteriovenous shunt, coarctation of aorta); caution in liver and renal disease and Leber's optic atrophy and in patients susceptible to developing methemoglobinemia.
    E) DRUG THERAPY
    1) DOPAMINE AGONISTS
    a) BROMOCRIPTINE
    1) INDICATIONS
    a) Specific therapy is directed at reversing dopamine blockade with a centrally-acting dopamine agonist, eg, bromocriptine. but can particularly be useful in patients with primary thermoregulatory abnormalities (Schneider, 1991; Dhib-Jalbut et al, 1983) (Zubenko & Harrison, 1983). It can be given alone or in combination with dantrolene (Brady et al, 1999).
    b) Available only in oral form; must be given early, before patient loses gag reflex, which limits usefulness to less severe cases or to use concomitantly with dantrolene (Schneider, 1991).
    1) Some studies report no beneficial effects and suggest that bromocriptine might actually worsen the course of NMS (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989; Rosebush et al, 1991a).
    c) RECOMMENDATION
    1) Doses of 2.5 to 10 mg orally {or via nasogastric tube} 3 to 4 times per day (Juurlink, 2011); if response is inadequate, increase dose by 2.5 mg every 24 hours until a response or until reaching a maximum dose of 45 mg/day (Berman, 2011).
    2) It is usually maintained for at least 10 days to treat NMS for patient's exposed to oral neuroleptics and 2 to 3 weeks for depot neuroleptics. Early discontinuation may result in relapse (Berman, 2011).
    d) PRECAUTIONS
    1) It directly opposes the dopamine effects of antipsychotic medications, but may be associated with worsening a patient's underlying psychiatric illness (Perry & Wilborn, 2012; Juurlink, 2011).
    2) Contraindicated in uncontrolled hypertension or toxemia of pregnancy; caution in patients with hypotension, dementia, or a history of myocardial infarction.
    b) OTHER DOPAMINERGIC AGENTS
    1) SUMMARY: Other dopaminergic agents that have been used include amantadine, levodopa and apomorphine (Berman, 2011).
    2) AMANTADINE
    a) INDICATIONS
    1) Specific therapy is directed at reversing dopamine blockade with a centrally-acting dopamine agonist (eg, amantadine). Particularly useful in patients with primary thermoregulatory abnormalities (Velamoor, 1998). Amantadine has been anecdotally associated with success as a dopamine agonists (Juurlink, 2011; Berman, 2011).
    b) RECOMMENDATION (ADULT)
    1) DOSE: ADULT: 100 mg orally or by nasogastric tube every 8 hours. Continue for up to 7 days, until patient's condition improves clinically or until creatine kinase levels return to normal. Then, withdraw slowly over additional 3 days. Early discontinuation may result in relapse (Velamoor, 1998).
    c) PRECAUTIONS
    1) Seizure risk increased in patients with active seizure disorder (use lower dose); reduce dose of other anticholinergics; use cautiously with CNS stimulants; increased amantadine plasma concentrations with concomitant hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene therapy.
    2) MUSCLE RELAXANTS
    a) DANTROLENE
    1) INITIAL DOSE: Dantrolene, a muscle relaxant that works by inhibiting calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, may be effective in shortening the duration of illness. Dantrolene can be started at an initial dose of 1 to 2.5 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg every 6 hours up to a maximum dose of 10 mg/kg/day (Prod Info RYANODEX(R) intravenous injection suspension, 2014; Berman, 2011). It appears to be most beneficial in patients with pronounced muscular rigidity. Oral dantrolene can be used in less severe cases or to taper the dose following initial IV therapy after several days. The oral dose can range from 50 to 200 mg/day. NOTE: Dantrolene can be hepatotoxic at levels above 10 mg/kg/day. The drug is usually discontinued once symptoms begin to resolve due to the risk of hepatotoxicity (Berman, 2011).
    2) Patients with disturbance of consciousness may require longer duration of treatment (Tsutsumi et al, 1998).
    3) INDICATIONS
    a) Specific therapy is directed at reducing muscle rigidity with a peripherally-acting muscle relaxant, eg, dantrolene. Most useful in cases in which severe muscle rigidity/contraction is predominant feature, particularly if patient loses ability to swallow (Berman, 2011; Coons et al, 1982; Goekopp & Carbatt, 1982; May et al, 1983; Goulon et al, 1983; Caroff & Mann, 1993).
    b) Review of NMS in the pediatric literature indicated dantrolene might not be effective in children; mortality was 9%, with 20% serious sequelae; duration of NMS ranged from 1 to 119 days (Silva et al, 1999).
    4) PRECAUTIONS
    a) Caution with history of hepatic, cardiac, or pulmonary dysfunction (obstructive pulmonary disease); discontinue or decrease dose with severe weakness or diarrhea.
    5) EFFICACY
    a) Variable; it can be ineffective as a sole agent. Most efficacious in reducing rigidity and the fever that may be produced at a muscular level; will not always resolve mental status changes or psychotic symptoms that probably are more central in origin. Efficacy may be improved if given with dopamine agonist (ie, bromocriptine) (Perry & Wilborn, 2012; Granato et al, 1983; Blue et al, 1986; May et al, 1983).
    b) Dantrolene and bromocriptine are the 2 most widely used agents used in the treatment of NMS (Perry & Wilborn, 2012). Some studies report NO beneficial effects or inadequate supportive evidence for its use (Juurlink, 2011) and suggest that dantrolene might even worsen the course of NMS (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) (Rosebush et al, 1991a).
    3) OTHER
    a) It has been suggested that anticholinergic and antihistaminic agents should be considered as first line therapy in patients with a fever of less than 38.5 degrees C. Other agents include benztropine (2 to 8 mg/day IV), trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (2 to 10 mg/day, orally) and diphenhydramine (50 to 250 mg/day) (Brady et al, 1999).
    4) CALCIUM ANTAGONISTS
    a) NIFEDIPINE
    1) Nifedipine has been effective in rapidly eradicating most NMS signs, including hypertension, fever, tachycardia, urinary incontinence, rigidity, and stupor (Hermesh et al, 1988a).
    2) Mechanisms through which nifedipine reverses NMS are unknown (Hermesh et al, 1988a):
    a) May possess anti-NMS potential; may act by displacing offending neuroleptic agents from dopamine D2-receptors in the hypothalamus or striatum.
    b) Neuronal or muscular calcium channels may be involved in pathophysiology of NMS; may block excessive calcium flow across muscle plasma membranes and diminish excessive contraction.
    c) Further studies of the use of nifedipine in NMS are warranted.
    5) ANTICONVULSANTS
    a) CARBAMAZEPINE
    1) One case of NMS associated with a phenothiazine and another associated with a combination of a phenothiazine and butyrophenone both responded to administration of carbamazepine. Mechanism for the treatment of NMS with carbamazepine remains unclear (Thomas et al, 1998).
    F) FEELING AGITATED
    1) Benzodiazepines are indicated for immediate relaxation, for sedation of violent patients, or when there is a question in differential diagnosis of NMS versus lethal catatonia. NMS may respond to other treatments, but lethal catatonia may improve only with benzodiazepine therapy. Avoid physical restraints, which can increase agitation and core temperature.
    a) Intravenous DIAZEPAM (Adults: 5 to 10 mg every 5 to 10 minutes as needed; Child: 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg every 5 to 10 minutes as needed) may be helpful. Monitor for respiratory depression and need for endotracheal intubation.
    b) LORAZEPAM has also been suggested in patients with a body temperature of less than 102 degrees F and minimal to moderate behavioral signs: Start with 3 to 4 mg/day, increasing to 12 to 16 mg/day within a few days.
    G) DRUG-INDUCED DYSTONIA
    1) ADULT
    a) BENZTROPINE: 1 to 4 mg once or twice daily intravenously or intramuscularly; maximum dose: 6 mg/day; 1 to 2 mg of the injection will usually provide quick relief in emergency situations (Prod Info benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, 2009).
    b) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 10 to 50 mg intravenously at a rate not exceeding 25 mg/minute or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 100 mg/dose; 400 mg/day (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    2) CHILDREN
    a) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 5 mg/kg/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day intravenously divided into 4 doses at a rate not to exceed 25 mg/min, or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 300 mg/day. Not recommended in premature infants and neonates (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    H) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    2) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    3) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    4) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    5) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).
    I) ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY
    1) SUMMARY: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be effective even in cases of failed drug therapy. It is considered a second-line therapy (Wysokinski, 2012; Juurlink, 2011).
    2) MECHANISM: Although its mechanism is not completely understood, NMS has been successfully treated in a limited number of cases with electroconvulsive therapy. If an NMS patient receives ECT, it is recommended that the individual be paralyzed with a nondepolarizing agent, since a depolarizing agent is contraindicated owing to its tendency to increase serum potassium levels (Carbone, 2000).
    3) INDICATIONS FOR THERAPY: If pharmacologic treatment has not been successful and the patient continues to have fever, autonomic and behavioral signs or if the severity of the condition is seen as malignant (fever greater than 102 degrees F, severe hypertension and tachycardia, delirium, or stupor), ECT may be considered ((Fink, 2001)). ECT has also been suggested in severe cases of NMS in which patients are at high risk to develop complications including dysphoria with psychosis and catatonia (muscle rigidity) (Perry & Wilborn, 2012).
    4) DURATION OF THERAPY: Although the number of ECT sessions is variable, patients with NMS have experienced significant clinical improvement after 3 to 5 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT); some authors have reported improvements after 8 sessions given over 6 weeks. In most cases, the response to ECT is usually faster than drug therapy and can be more effective in patients with severe symptoms (Wysokinski, 2012).
    5) RISK OF THERAPY: The primary risk of therapy includes cardiovascular (initial bradycardia followed by tachycardia), malignant hyperthermia secondary to anaesthesia and hyperkalemia. Due to the potential for increased cardiac work, ischemic injury and dysrhythmias may develop (Verdura Vizcaino et al, 2011).
    6) CASE REPORT: A 81-year-old woman, with a history of depression, was admitted with severe depression and psychotic symptoms. Her initial symptoms included irritability, severe anxiety, ideations of being poisoned, and restlessness. Haloperidol was started to treat symptoms (reaching a maximum dose of 4 mg/day) along with restarting her antidepressant medications. By day 4, she had developed signs and symptoms (ie, fever, sweating, rigidity, increased creatinine) consistent with NMS. Her psychopharmacologic medications were stopped and supportive care was initiated. Approximately 2 weeks later, the patient was clinically improved and risperidone was started to treat her depressive mood. Ten days later, the patient had a recurrence of NMS and all medications were discontinued. Following several significant clinical complications (eg, acute coronary syndrome, bilateral pneumonia, splenic infarction and bacteremia), the patient was treated successfully with 8 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (Gonzalez-Blanco et al, 2013).
    7) CASE REPORT/REFRACTORY SYMPTOMS: A 44 year-old man, with a long history of paranoid schizophrenia receiving oral clozapine (500 mg/day) and haloperidol (10 mg/day), was admitted with increasing psychomotor agitation, delusions, auditory hallucinations and verbal aggression. Both medications were increased prior to admission. On day 3, the patient became febrile with increasing muscle rigidity and muscle tremor. A neuroinfection was initially suspected, but a rising CPK level (7192 Units/L; peaked at 8241 Units/L) was consistent with NMS. His antipsychotics were discontinued. Due to his deteriorating respiratory status, the patient required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Pharmacologic therapy included amantadine, lorazepam (10 mg/day), bromocriptine 15 mg/day and diazepam as needed. Other therapies included mannitol, furosemide fraxiparine, and metoprolol. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was started on day 6, due to a lack of clinical improvement (ie, increased muscle rigidity in all extremities, multiple contractures in the upper and lower extremities). The patient required a total of 19 ECT sessions with significant clinical improvement following the ninth session. No adverse events developed related to the therapy. However, persistent psychotic symptoms required the restart of clozapine; slowly titrated to a dose of 400 mg/day. The patient's clinical course was slow to improve but he was discharged on day 114 with permanent hypoesthesia and paresis of the left hand fingers. One year later he had no symptoms of NMS (Wysokinski, 2012).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) HEMODIALYSIS may be necessary to treat acute oliguric renal failure or to correct electrolyte abnormalities (Brady et al 2001). It is, however, ineffective at removing neuroleptics, which are tightly bound to proteins and lipids (Caroff & Mann, 1993; Granner & Wooten, 1991).
    2) CONTINUOUS VENOVENOUS HEMOFILTRATION with cooling of extracorporeal system has been successful in decreasing temperature refractory to other treatments in NMS (Perez-Vela et al, 1996).

Summary

    A) The development of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) occurs in 1 of 2 pharmacologic settings: administration of drugs that block dopamine receptors in the central nervous system, and sudden cessation or reduction of dopamine agonists in patients with idiopathic parkinsonism.
    B) Decreasing incidence has been reported and may be the result of improved awareness and treatment.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Due to great individual variation in susceptibility to NMS, estimates of any particular drug or chemical are of doubtful value in determining morbidity or mortality.
    2) Mortality has declined since the mid-1980s and continues to decline. It has decreased from greater than 25% prior to 1984 to a range of 4% to 10% in the late 1990s (Silva et al, 1999; Caroff & Mann, 1993; Shalev et al, 1989) Rosenberg & Green, 1989; (Rosebush & Stewart, 1989) (Addonizio et al, 1986).
    3) Decreasing incidence may be the result of improved awareness with more rapid diagnosis and earlier, more aggressive treatment (Shalev et al, 1989).
    4) Deaths associated with NMS are NOT a direct result of the pharmacologic mechanism that triggers NMS; rather, it results from an accumulation of secondary and tertiary effects (eg, acute myoglobinuric renal failure following rhabdomyolysis, which results from extreme muscle contraction).
    a) Fatalities are usually due to cardiovascular collapse, respiratory arrest, or myoglobinuric renal failure (Pope et al, 1986); the latter is a strong predictor of fatal outcome (50% mortality risk) (Shalev et al, 1989).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The development of NMS occurs in 1 of 2 pharmacologic settings: administration of drugs that block dopamine receptors in the central nervous system and sudden cessation or reduction of dopamine agonists in patients with idiopathic parkinsonism (Balzan, 1998; Granner & Wooten, 1991).

General Bibliography

    1) Addonizio G, Susman VL, & Roth SD: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: review and analysis of 115 cases. Biol Psychiatry 1987a; 22:1004-1020.
    2) Addonizio G, Susman VL, & Roth SD: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: review and analysis of 115 cases.. Biol Psychiatry 1987; 22:1004-1020.
    3) Addonizio G, Susman VL, & Roth SD: Symptoms of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in 82 consecutive inpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:1587-1590.
    4) Adityanjee: Spectrum concept of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 153:107-111.
    5) American Heart Association: 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005; 112(24 Suppl):IV 1-203. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/vol112/24_suppl/. As accessed 12/14/2005.
    6) Ananth J, Parameswaran S, Gunatilake S, et al: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65:464-470.
    7) Aruna AS & Murungi JH: Fluphenazine-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a schizophrenic patient. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(6):1131-1135.
    8) Baca L & Martinelli L: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a unique association with a tricyclic antidepressant. Neurology 1990; 40:1797-1798.
    9) Bajjoka I, Patel T, & O'Sullivan T: Risperidone-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30:698-700.
    10) Balzan MV: The neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a logical approach to the patient with temperature and rigidity. Postgrad Med J 1998; 74:72-76.
    11) Berman BD: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review for neurohospitalists. Neurohospitalist 2011; 1(1):41-47.
    12) Blue MG, Schneider SM, & Noro S: Successful treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome with sodium nitroprusside. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:56-57.
    13) Boorse RC & Rhodes M: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a multiple trauma patient. Arch Surg 1990; 125:274-275.
    14) Brady WJ, Esterowitz D, & Genco M: Life-threatening syndromes presenting with altered mentation and muscular rigidity: neuroleptic malignant syndrome, hyperthermia, thyrotoxicosis, and malignant catatonia.. Emerg Med Rep 1999; 20:51-60.
    15) Breitbart W, Marotta RF, & Call P: AIDS and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (letter). Lancet 1988; 2:1488-1489.
    16) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    17) Burch EA & Downs J: Development of neuroleptic malignant syndrome during simultaneous amoxapine treatment and alprazolam discontinuation. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1987; 7:55-56.
    18) Burch EA Jr & Montoya J: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an AIDS patient (letter). J Clin Psychopharmacol 1989; 9:228-229.
    19) Burke C, Fulda GJ, & Castellano J: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a trauma patient. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1995; 39:796-798.
    20) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    21) Carbone JR: The neuroleptic malignant and serotonin syndromes. Psych Emerg 2000; 18:317-325.
    22) Caroff SN & Mann SC: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Med Clin North Am 1993; 77:185-203.
    23) Caroff SN, Mann SC, & Lazarus A: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: diagnostic issues. Psychiatr Ann 1991; 21:130-147.
    24) Cassidy EM & O'Kearne V: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome after venlafaxine (letter). Lancet 2000; 355:2164-2165.
    25) Coons DJ, Hillman FJ, & Marshall RW: Treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome with dantrolene sodium: a case report. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139:944-945.
    26) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    27) Cullinane CA, Brumfield C, & Flint LM: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with multiple joint dislocations in a trauma patient. J Trauma 1998; 45:168-171.
    28) DRUGDEX(R) : Toll Laura & Shahan DR (Eds): DRUGDEX(R) System, vol 110 (expires 12/01). MICROMEDEX, Inc. Greenwood Village, Colorado. 2001.
    29) Deng MZ, Chen GQ, & Phillips MR: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in 12 of 9,792 Chinese inpatients exposed to neuroleptics: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:1149-1155.
    30) Dhib-Jalbut S, Hesselbrock R, & Brott: Treatment of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome with bromocriptine. JAMA 1983; 250:484-485.
    31) Edelstein HE, Chirurgi VA, & Gloudeman MW: Adverse reactions to phenothiazine antiemetics in AIDS (letter). DICP 1991; 25:1007.
    32) Edwards MSB: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (letter). Pediatrics 1991; 88:1074.
    33) Ehara H, Maegaki Y, & Takeshita K: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and methylphenidate. Pediatr Neurol 1998; 19:299-301.
    34) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    35) Filice GA, McDougall BC, & Ercan-Fang N: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with olanzapine. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32:1158-1159.
    36) Friedman JH, Feinberg SS, & Feldman RG: A neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome due to levodopa withdrawal. JAMA 1985; 254:2792-2795.
    37) Gelenberg AJ, Bellinghausen B, & Wojcik JD: A prospective survey of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a short-term psychiatric hospital. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:517-518.
    38) Gleason PP & Conigliaro RL: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome with risperidone. Pharmacotherapy 1997; 17:617-621.
    39) Goekopp JG & Carbatt PA: Treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome with dantrolene. Lancet 1982; 2:49-50.
    40) Gonzalez-Blanco L, Garcia-Prada H, Santamarina S, et al: Recurrence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2013; 41(5):314-318.
    41) Goulon M, deRohan-Chabot P, & Elkharrat D: Beneficial effects of dantrolene in the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a report of 2 cases. Neurology 1983; 33:516-518.
    42) Graham BS, Lichtenstein MJ, & Hinson JM: Nonexertional heatstroke: physiologic management and cooling in 14 patients. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:87-90.
    43) Granato JE, Stern BJ, & Ringel A: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: successful treatment with dantrolene and bromocriptine. Ann Neurol 1983; 14:89-90.
    44) Granner MA & Wooten GF: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome or parkinsonism hyperpyrexia syndrome. Semin Neurol 1991; 11:228-235.
    45) Gratz SS, Levinson DF, & Simpson GM: The treatment and management of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiat 1992; 16:425-443.
    46) Gurrera RJ, Chang SS, & Romero JA: A comparison of diagnostic criteria for neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry 1992; 53:56-62.
    47) Guze BH & Baxter LR Jr: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. N Engl J Med 1985; 313:163-166.
    48) Harradine PG, Williams SE, & Doherty SR: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: an underdiagnosed condition. MJA 2001; 174:593-594.
    49) Harris MJ & Jeste DV: Evaluation and management of HIV/AIDS and psychosis. Clin Advances in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders 1989; 3:8-9.
    50) Hasan S & Buckley P: Novel antipsychotics and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review and critique. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1113-1116.
    51) Hatch CD, Lund BC, & Perry PJ: Failed challenge with quetiapine after neuroleptic malignant syndrome with conventional antipsychotics. Pharmacother 2001; 21:1003-1006.
    52) Heird SB, Rhoads JE, & Agarwal NN: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a trauma patient: case report. J Trauma 1989; 29:1595-1597.
    53) Henderson VW & Wooten GF: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a pathogenetic role for dopamine receptor blockade?. Neurology 1981; 31:132-137.
    54) Hermesh H, Aizenberg D, & Lapidot M: Risk of malignant hyperthermia among patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome and their families. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:1431-1434.
    55) Hermesh H, Molcho A, & Aizenberg D: The calcium antagonist nifedipine in recurrent neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Clin Neuropharmacol 1988a; 11:552-555.
    56) Hernandez JL, Palacios-Araus L, & Echevarria S: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Postgrad Med J 1997; 3:779-784.
    57) Hirst R, Galloway GQ, & Borzotta AP: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case report in a multiple trauma patient. Injury 1993; 24:193-194.
    58) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    59) Horowitz BZ: The golden hour in heat stroke: use of iced peritoneal lavage. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7:616-619.
    60) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    61) Isik AT & Soysal P: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an elderly patient with normal pressure hydrocephalus overlapping corticobasal degeneration. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2015; 30(4):417-420.
    62) Jacobs LG: The neuroleptic malignant syndrome: often an unrecognized geriatric problem. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44:474-475.
    63) Joshi PT, Capozzoli JA, & Coyle JT: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: life-threatening complication of neuroleptic treatment in adolescents with affective disorder. Pediatrics 1991; 87:235-239.
    64) June R, Yunus M, & Gossman W: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with nortriptyline (letter). Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17:736-737.
    65) Juurlink DN: Antipsychotics. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011.
    66) Keck PE Jr, Caroff SN, & McElroy SL: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant hyperthermia: end of a controversy?. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995; 7:135-144.
    67) Keck PE Jr, Pope HG Jr, & Cohen BM: Risk factors for neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case-control study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989a; 46:914-918.
    68) Keck PE Jr, Pope HG Jr, & McElroy SL: Frequency and presentation of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144:1344-1346.
    69) Keck PE Jr, Sebastianelli J, & Pope HG Jr: Frequency and presentation of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a state psychiatric hospital. J Clin Psychiatry 1989; 50:352-355.
    70) Keepers GA: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with withdrawal from carbamazepine. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:1687.
    71) Kirkpatrick B & Edelsohn GA: Risk factors for the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Psychiatr Med 1985; 2:371-381.
    72) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    73) Kouparanis A, Bozikas A, Spilioti M, et al: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a patient on long-term olanzapine treatment at a stable dose: Successful treatment with dantrolene. Brain Inj 2015; 29(5):658-660.
    74) Kurlan R, Hamill R, & Shoulson I: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Clin Neuropharmacol 1984; 7:109-120.
    75) Lal V, Sardana V, & Thussu A: Cerebellar degeneration following neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Postgrad Med 1997; 865:735-736.
    76) Lee JW & Robertson S: Clozapine withdrawal catatonia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a case report. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1997; 3:165-169.
    77) Leibold J, Patel V, & Hasan RA: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with ziprasidone in an adolescent. Clin Ther 2004; 26:1105-1108.
    78) Levenson JL: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:1137-1145.
    79) Levinson DF & Simpson GM: Neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms with fever; heterogeneity of the "neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43:839-848.
    80) M Fink: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant catatonia: Effective treatment. MDVista. Fremont, CA, USA. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.mdvista.com/templates/professionaleducation/articles.asp.
    81) Manser TJ & Warner JF: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with prochlorperazine. South Med J 1990; 83:73-74.
    82) May DC, Morris SW, & Stewart RW: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: response to dantrolene sodium. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98:183-184.
    83) Merriam AE: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome after imipramine withdrawal. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1987; 7:53-54.
    84) Modestin J, Toffler G, & Drescher JP: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: results of a prospective study. Psychiatry Res 1992; 44:251-256.
    85) Morris E, Green D, & Graudins A: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome developing after acute overdose with olanzapine and chlorpromazine. J Med Toxicol 2009; 5(1):24-26.
    86) Nierenberg D, Disch M, Manheimer E, et al: Facilitating prompt diagnosis and treatment of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Clin Pharm Ther 1991; 50(5 Pt 1):580-586.
    87) Nimmagadda SR, Ryan DH, & Atkin SL: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome after venlafaxine (letter). Lancet 2000; 354:289-290.
    88) Nisijima K & Ishiguro T: Cerebrospinal fluid levels of monoamine metabolites and gamma-aminobutyric acid in neuroleptic malignant syndrome.. J Psychiat Res 1995; 29:233-244.
    89) Numa A: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in children. Med J Aust 1991; 155:417-419.
    90) Ochi G, Watanabe K, & Tokuoka H: Neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome: a complication of acute organophosphate poisoning. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:1027-1030.
    91) Parada MA, Puig de Parada M, & Rada P: Sulpiride increases and dopamine decreases intracranial temperature in rats when injected in the lateral hypothalamus: an animal model for the neuroleptic malignant syndrome?. Brain Res 1995; 674:117-121.
    92) Perez-Vela JL, Casado MS, & Sanchez-Izquierdo Riera JA: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a patient with head injury. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:593-595.
    93) Perry PJ & Wilborn CA: Serotonin syndrome vs neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a contrast of causes, diagnoses, and management. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2012; 24(2):155-162.
    94) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    95) Pope HG Jr, Keck PE Jr, & McElroy SL: Frequency and presentation of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a large psychiatric hospital. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:1227-1233.
    96) Precourt A, Dunewicz M, Gregoire G, et al: Multiple complications and withdrawal syndrome associated with quetiapine/venlafaxine intoxication. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(1):153-156.
    97) Product Information: RYANODEX(R) intravenous injection suspension, dantrolene sodium intravenous injection suspension. Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per manufacturer), Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 2014.
    98) Product Information: benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp, Eatontown, NJ, 2009.
    99) Product Information: diphenhydramine hcl injection, diphenhydramine hcl injection. Bioniche Pharma USA,LLC, Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    100) Reilly JJ, Crowe SF, & Lloyd JH: Neuroleptic toxicity syndromes: a clinical spectrum. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1991; 25:299-505.
    101) Rosebush P & Stewart T: A prospective analysis of 24 episodes of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146:717-725.
    102) Rosebush PI & Mazurek MF: Serum iron and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Lancet 1991b; 338:149-151.
    103) Rosebush PI, Stewart T, & Mazurek MF: The treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome: are dantrolene and bromocriptine useful adjuncts to supportive care?. Br J Psychiatry 1991a; 159:709-712.
    104) Rosenberg MR & Green M: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: review of response to therapy. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149:1927-1931.
    105) Rosenbush PI & Mazurek MF: Serum iron and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Lancet 1991; 338:149-151.
    106) Sachdev P, Mason C, & Hadzi-Pavlovic D: Case-control study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1156-1158.
    107) Samie MR: Neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome induced by metoclopramide. Mov Dis 1987; 2:57-60.
    108) Sater N & Constantino JN: Pediatric emergencies in children with psychiatric conditions. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14:42-50.
    109) Schneider S: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: controversies in treatment. Am J Emerg Med 1991; 9:360-362.
    110) Sewell DD & Jeste DV: Distinguishing neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) from NMS-like acute medical illnesses: a study of 34 cases. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 4:265-269.
    111) Shalev A & Munitz H: The neuroleptic malignant syndrome: agent and host interaction. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 73:337-347.
    112) Shalev A, Hermesh H, & Munitz H: Mortality from neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry 1989; 50:18-25.
    113) Silva RR, Munoz DM, & Alpert M: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38:187-194.
    114) Smego RA & Durack DT: The neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Arch Intern Med 1982; 142:1183-1185.
    115) Thomas P, Maron M, & Rascle C: Carbamazepine in the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 43:303-305.
    116) Toru M, Matsuda D, & Makiguchi K: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome-like state following a withdrawal of antiparkinsonian drugs. J Nerv Ment Dis 1981; 169:324-327.
    117) Tsutsumi Y, Yamamoto K, & Matsuura S: The treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome using dantrolene sodium. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 52:433-438.
    118) Ueda M, Hamamoto M, & Nagayama H: Susceptibility to neuroleptic malignant syndrome in parkinson's disease. Neurology 1999; 52:777-781.
    119) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    120) Velamoor VR, Norman RMG, & Caroff SN: Progression of symptoms in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis 1994; 182:168-173.
    121) Velamoor VR, Swamy GN, & Parmar LRS: Management of suspected neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Can J Psychiatry 1995; 40:545-550.
    122) Velamoor VR: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: recognition, prevention and management. Drug Saf 1998; 9:73-82.
    123) Verdura Vizcaino EJ, Ballesteros Sanz D, & Sanz-Fuentenebro J: Electroconvulsive therapy as treatment for malignant neuroleptic syndrome. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment 2011; 4(3):169-176.
    124) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    125) Wysokinski A: Intensive electroconvulsive therapy in drug resistant neuroleptic malignant syndrome - case report. Psychiatr Danub 2012; 24(2):219-222.
    126) Yaman A, Kendirli T, Odek C, et al: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with metoclopramide in a child. Turk J Pediatr 2014; 56(5):535-537.