MOBILE VIEW  | 

MORPHINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    a) Immediate release formulations are available as tablets of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg; an oral solution of 10 mg/5 mL, 20 mg/5 mL, or 20 mg/mL; and intravenous solution of 0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, 8 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, 15 mg/mL, 25 mg/mL, or 50 mg/mL and rectal suppositories of 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg or 30 mg (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009; Prod Info morphine sulfate intravenous solution, USP, 2003; Prod Info Morphine Sulfate Rectal Suppositories, 2001).
    2) MODIFIED-RELEASE
    a) GENERIC: Oral capsule, extended-release: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg. Oral tablets, extended-release: 15 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg (Prod Info morphine sulfate extended-release oral tablets, 2009)
    b) AVINZA: Oral capsule, extended-release, 24 hr: 30 mg, 45 mg, 60 mg, 75 mg, 90 mg, 120 mg (Prod Info AVINZA(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2005).
    c) KADIAN: Oral capsule, extended-release: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, 130 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg (Prod Info KADIAN(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2009).
    d) MS CONTIN: Oral tablet, extended-release: 15 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg (Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) controlled-release oral tablets, 2006).
    e) COMBINATION PRODUCT capsules containing extended-release morphine sulfate with naltrexone are available as 20 mg/0.8 mg; 30 mg/1.2 mg; 50 mg/2 mg; 60 mg/2.4 mg; 80 mg/3.2 mg; 100 mg/4 mg combinations of extended-release morphine sulfate/naltrexone hydrochloride, respectively (Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended release capsules, 2013).
    3) Duramorph(TM) 0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL is available for IV, epidural, and intrathecal administration (Prod Info DURAMORPH(TM) IV, epidural or intrathecal injection, 2005). Infumorph(TM) 10 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL are available for epidural and intrathecal administration via a continuous microinfusion device (Prod Info INFUMORPH(TM)200,INFUMORPH(TM)500 epidural, intrathecal solution, 2004).
    B) USES
    1) Morphine is an opioid analgesic used orally and intravenously primarily for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is also used for epidural anesthesia (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009; Prod Info DepoDur(R) extended-release epidural injection, 2008; Prod Info ORAMORPH(R) SR sustained-release oral tablets, 2006; Prod Info morphine sulfate intravenous solution, USP, 2003; Prod Info Morphine Sulfate Rectal Suppositories, 2001). It is subject to diversion and used as a drug of abuse.

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Morphine is an opioid analgesic used orally and intravenously primarily for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is also used for epidural anesthesia. It is subject to diversion and used as a drug of abuse.

Specific Substances

    1) Morphine Acetate (synonym)
    2) Morphine Sulphate (synonym)
    3) Morphine Sulfas (synonym)
    4) Morphine Sulfate
    5) Morphini Sulfas (synonym)
    6) CAS 596-15-6 (anhydrous morphine acetate) (synonym)
    7) CAS 5974-11-8 (morphine acetate trihydrate) (synonym)
    8) CAS 64-31-3 (anhydrous morphine sulfate) (synonym)
    9) CAS 6211-15-0 (morphine acetate trihydrate) (synonym)

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Morphine is primarily used for the treatment of pain. Morphine may be abused for euphoric effects by multiple routes (ie, injection, insufflation, smoking, ingestion).
    B) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is not common, but may be more common in patients with chronic opioid abuse or dependence, and may be life threatening.
    C) PHARMACOLOGY: Morphine binds primarily at the Mu opiate receptors at therapeutic doses. Morphine is an opiate, a group of naturally occurring compounds derived from the poppy, Papaver somniferum.
    D) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils. Mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.
    3) INTRATHECAL INJECTION: Hypotension, respiratory depression, hypertension, CNS depression, agitation, and protracted seizures have been reported after intrathecal morphine overdose.
    4) EPIDURAL OVERDOSE: Even massive large overdoses have only caused CNS and respiratory depression.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Morphine is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Fetal physical dependence, withdrawal symptoms and respiratory difficulties may occur in infants born to mothers physically dependent on opioids. Neonatal withdrawal may be seen in the infants of addicted mothers 12 to 72 hours after birth. Infants may be dehydrated, irritable, and experience tremors and cry continually and may have diarrhea.
    B) Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and World Health Organization state that therapeutic doses of morphine can usually be administered safely during the breastfeeding period, because of the possibility of excess sedation and respiratory depression in the nursing infant, morphine sulfate is not recommended for the nursing mother.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Morphine plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens will detect morphine and confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a suspected overdose that may include combination products.
    E) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT and/or lumbar puncture to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may only need observation.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for severe toxicity (respiratory or CNS depression). Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: GI decontamination is generally not indicated because of the risk of aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE, an opioid antagonist, is the specific antidote. Naloxone can be given intravascularly, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intranasally or endotracheally. The usual dose is 0.4 to 2.0 mg IV. In patients with suspected opioid dependence, incremental doses of 0.2 mg IV should be administered, titrated to reversal of respiratory depression and coma, to avoid precipitating acute opioid withdrawal. Doses may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg, although such high doses are rarely needed.
    2) A CONTINUOUS infusion will likely be necessary in patients that have a controlled-release formulation ingestion of morphine. A suggested starting rate is two-thirds of the dose effective for initial reversal that is administered each hour; titrate as needed. DURATION of effect is usually 1 to 2 hours. Morphine has a longer duration of effect, so it is necessary to observe the patient at least 4 hours after the last dose of naloxone to ensure that the patient does not have recurrent symptoms of toxicity. Naloxone can precipitate withdrawal in an opioid-dependent patients, which is usually not life-threatening; however it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia. Treatment includes ensuring adequate oxygenation, and administering intravenous benzodiazepines; propofol or barbiturates may be indicated, if seizures persist. Patients with massive intrathecal morphine overdose have required barbiturate coma with continuous EEG monitoring to control seizures and myoclonus.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Acute lung injury can develop in a small proportion of patients after an acute opioid overdose. The pathophysiology is unclear. Patients should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after overdose to evaluate for hypoxia and/or the development of acute lung injury.
    H) HYPOTENSION
    1) Hypotension is often reversed by naloxone. Initially, treat with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure if hypotension persists.
    I) INTRATHECAL OVERDOSE
    1) Massive intrathecal overdose can cause severe toxicity. Keep the patient upright if possible (may not be useful unless overdose is recognized immediately if solution is isobaric). Immediately drain AT LEAST 20 mL CSF; drainage of up to 70 mL has been tolerated in adults. Follow with CSF exchange (remove serial 20 mL aliquots CSF and replace with equivalent volumes of warmed, preservative free normal saline or lactated ringers). Consult a neurosurgeon immediately for placement of a ventricular catheter and begin ventriculolumbar perfusion (infuse warmed preservative free normal saline or lactated ringers through ventricular catheter, drain fluid from a lumbar catheter). The optimal volume and duration is not known. In one case, irrigation with 900 mL of lactated ringers over 1 hour was associated with a 97% reduction in CSF morphine concentration.
    J) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of the large volume of distribution of morphine.
    K) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid-naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a healthcare professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid-naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions, adults with symptoms or ingesting more than a therapeutic dose, or any pediatric ingestion should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment.
    a) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe for at least 4 hours, to ensure that peak plasma levels have been reached and there has been sufficient time for symptoms to develop. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    b) MODIFIED RELEASE: Patients that have ingested a controlled-release morphine preparation have the potential for delayed and prolonged effects and should be observed for at least 12 to 16 hours. The Tmax of many of these preparations is in the range of 7 to 9 hours after therapeutic doses and may be prolonged after overdose. Morphine continues to be released from these preparations adding to the systemic morphine load for up to 48 hours or longer after use.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Patients with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a controlled-release formulation has likely been taken; additional doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting. MODIFIED RELEASE: Any patient developing even minor to moderate opioid effects and any patient requiring naloxone should be admitted to a monitored setting as they are at risk for more severe or prolonged symptoms.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear. Refer patients for substance abuse counseling if indicated.
    L) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Naloxone's duration of effect is shorter than the duration of effect for morphine. Other causes of altered mental status must be ruled out, such as hypoxia or hypoglycemia.
    M) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Rapidly absorbed, onset 60 minutes and duration about 4 hours for immediate release oral product, duration 8 to 12 hours for modified release products. Vd: 4 L/kg. Protein binding: 20% to 35%. Hepatic metabolism and conjugation. Elimination half-life: 2 to 4 hours. MODIFIED RELEASE: Tmax: Avinza(TM): 30 minutes (two components with an immediate-release and an extended-release components of 30 minute and maintained for 24 hours, respectively). Kadian(R): 8.6 hours; Embeda(R): 7.5 hours. Morphine sulfate controlled-release preparations are continued to be released adding to the morphine load for up to 48 hours or longer after use, requiring prolonged monitoring.
    N) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Abusers may crush and inject, snort, swallow or smoke sustained release morphine preparations, rapidly achieving high serum levels and causing rapid absorption of the entire dose of a sustained-release formulation, which can produce euphoria quickly and place the individual at risk for severe toxicity. Opioids slow GI motility, which may lead to prolonged absorption. Half-life is prolonged after overdose of sustained release products (estimated 22 hours in one case).
    O) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Overdose with other sedating agents (eg, ethanol, benzodiazepine/barbiturate, antipsychotics); overdose with central alpha 2 agonists (eg, clonidine, tizanidine, imidazoline decongestants); CNS infection; intracranial hemorrhage; hypoglycemia or hypoxia.
    P) DRUG INTERACTIONS
    1) Coingestion of other CNS depressant drugs (eg, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ethanol) will increase the CNS and respiratory depressant effects.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The toxicity of morphine for an individual varies with tolerance developed from habitual use. In general, infants and children have unusual sensitivity to opioid agents. With timely administration of naloxone and respiratory support, patients will generally survive overdoses that would otherwise be lethal. Massive intrathecal overdose (in the range of 250 mg to 510 mg) causes life-threatening toxicity.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Nystagmus was reported in a woman who received tetracaine and preservative-free morphine intrathecally. Naloxone reversal was successful (Ueyama et al, 1992).
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Miosis is characteristic of opioid overdose.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild hypotension is common after overdose (Shenkman et al, 1995).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory depression is common with significant overdose (Gober et al, 1979; Fisher et al, 1987; Syed et al, 2006; Quevedo & Walsh, 1999).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute lung injury (pulmonary edema) may occur after severe opioid overdose (Glassroth et al, 1987; Jaffe & Martin, 1990).
    C) PULMONARY HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old asthmatic boy presented unconscious with decreased respirations and apparent epistaxis. His heart rate was 120 beats/min and respiratory rate was 6 breaths/min. Initially, nebulized bronchodilators and positive pressure ventilation improved his symptoms; however, treatment with salbutamol and ipratropium in the ED did not improve his condition and a rapid-sequence induction was performed. A large quantity of blood was suctioned from the oropharynx during laryngoscopy and from the endotracheal tube after intubation. A chest x-ray showed air space disease throughout the right lung and upper lobe of the left lung, indicating pulmonary hemorrhage. At this time, he received naloxone 0.4 mg IV, and his condition improved rapidly, but he became very agitated, requiring sedation. He also became hypotensive and a CBC showed an increased leukocyte count, normal hemoglobin and platelet counts. A capillary blood gas showed a pH of 6.998, PCO2 of 83.1 mm Hg, bicarbonate of 19.4 mM, and a base excess of -15.1 mM. Serum and urine screening tests for a variety of substances were negative, except for a very high morphine serum concentration (0.65 mg/L). At this time, it was found that he ingested as many as 15 controlled-release morphine sulfate 200 mg. A thoracic CT scan showed ground glass-appearing parenchyma in a perihilar distribution and a right basal infiltrate with a small pleural effusion. A right-side pneumothorax with extensive mediastinal emphysema, presumably related to high-ventilation pressures was also observed. Following a prolonged supportive care, including naloxone and treatments for hypotension, suspected aspiration pneumonia, and agitation (requiring several opioids agents), he gradually recovered and was discharged home on day 18 with clonidine and a tapering dose of oral morphine (Porter & O'Reilly, 2011).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CNS depression and coma are common with significant overdose (Landais, 2014; Syed et al, 2006; Quevedo & Walsh, 1999; Gock et al, 1999).
    B) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures may occur following overdoses, but are unusual following therapeutic dosing. Seizures may be related to hypoxia. Morphine-induced seizures are rare and primarily seen in neonates (Nelson, 1998). Rarely, use of naloxone to reverse opioid overdose has been reported to provoke seizures (Remskar et al, 1998). Intractable seizures have been reported after large intrathecal overdose.
    b) CASE REPORT - A 47-year-old woman inadvertently received a 35 mL (510 mg) bolus intrathecal injection of morphine, which was intended to be administered into her slow-release subcutaneous pump, and immediately became drowsy with a flushed face and miosis. Approximately 30 minutes later, the patient developed a headache, diplopia, disorientation, and clonic twitching of the left side of her face. The seizure activity became generalized, refractory to intravenous diazepam and phenytoin, necessitating mechanical ventilation and thiopental infusion. A brain CT scan revealed vasogenic edema in the posterior brain areas and an EEG showed generalized epileptic discharges. Twenty-four hours later, the thiopental infusion was discontinued and there was no recurrence of seizures. The patient gradually recovered following administration of naloxone. A repeat CT, 5 days postexposure, showed a decrease in the vasogenic edema (Yilmaz et al, 2003).
    c) CASE REPORT - An adult who received 250 mg morphine intrathecally developed initial hypotension, followed by hypertension, myoclonus, restlessness, agitation, and shortness of breath. She was intubated and required large doses of benzodiazepines and barbiturates to control myoclonus and seizures. Treatment included CSF irrigation (900 mL over 1 hour) and aggressive seizure control with complete recovery (Groudine et al, 1995).
    d) CASE REPORT- An adult received 450 mg morphine intrathecally. She became drowsy, then restless, with hypertension and hyperventilation followed by recurrent seizures. She was intubated, treated with benzodiazepines, phenytoin and barbiturates, naloxone, nitroprusside, intracranial pressure monitoring, and a lumbar drain was placed to remove 10 mL cerebrospinal fluid/hour by gravity. Cranial CT revealed a left frontal parenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhage believed to be secondary to hypertension. She recovered with no residual neurologic deficits (Sauter et al, 1994).
    C) LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Morphine intoxication, due to intentional ingestion of an unknown quantity of morphine tablets in a morphine-naive girl, has resulted in leukoencephalopathy. The 14-year-old girl was in a vegetative state and developed a quadriplegia. Plasma morphine levels 2 hours after admission were 500 ng/mL. MRI revealed leukoencephalopathy with high signal on T-2 weighted images from the centrum semiovale, cerebellar white matter and corpus callosum. It was felt that a hypoxic/ischemic event could only partly explain these findings and that direct morphine toxicity may have played a role. Recovery over one year was incomplete (Nanan et al, 2000).
    b) DELAYED POSTHYPOXIC LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY: A 54-year-old man was found unconscious after ingesting an unknown amount of morphine. On presentation, he was stuporous and required intubation. A brain CT scan revealed bilateral globi pallidi hypodensities and a diffusion-weighted brain MRI (DWI) was consisted with acute cerebral anoxia. Following supportive care, he gradually recovered and was discharged home with only mild confusion. Approximately 3 weeks later, he presented with confusion, lethargy, and diffuse rigidity, and later his condition gradually progressed to a state of "akinetic mutism". Physical examination revealed an increased deep tendon reflexes, extensor plantar responses and rigidity in all limbs. At this time, all laboratory results were normal. A brain MRI showed extensive confluent non-enhancing T2-weighted hyperintensity seen diffusely throughout the white matter in a relatively symmetric fashion. Abnormal hyperintensity throughout the corpus callosum was also noted on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. In region of the globus pallidi nucleus, T1 hyperintensity was observed bilaterally. Treatment with levodopa for severe rigidity resulted in only mild clinical benefit. Following supportive care, he still had mild lethargy, confusion, and diffuse rigidity on day 40, but his symptoms gradually improved. He was transferred to a specialized nursing home for further supportive care (Salazar & Dubow, 2012).
    D) DROWSY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sedation, drowsiness and light-headedness are common adverse effects (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009).
    E) MEMORY IMPAIRMENT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old man presented with impaired consciousness after using five 200 mg ampoules of morphine in a suicide attempt. On presentation, he had a Glasgow Coma Scale rating of 8, a respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, blood pressure of 90/60 mmHg, unresponsive miosis, and an oxygen saturation of 88%, indicating hypoxemia. Following supportive care, including naloxone treatment for 6 hours, his Glasgow Coma Scale rating improved to 12. He was transported to a psychiatric ward, and physical examination revealed temporo-spatial disorientation, an inappropriate jovial behavior, emotional distance, and progressively worsening memory impairment. On day 9, a brain MRI showed high signal intensity bilateral cortical hippocampic lesions that appeared hypointense in T1 weighted sequences. On day 20, a neuropsychological assessment showed no impairment in selective attention, mental flexibility or susceptibility to distraction, and preserved working memory, logical reasoning, logical-mathematical reasoning and planning, and immediate memory, but a significant impairment of encoding, recovery of information and memory consolidation was observed. His symptoms gradually improved and another MRI 10 months after presentation showed the complete resolution of T2 and diffusion hyperintensity lesions (Landais, 2014).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting are common adverse effects (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation is common with therapeutic use (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ITCHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Pruritus is a common adverse event following the administration of morphine (Larijani et al, 1996).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis can develop secondary to prolonged immobilization or seizures.
    b) CASE REPORT - A 39-year-old man with a C4 spinal cord injury and syringomalasia took an overdose of 100 mg morphine and an unknown amount of flurazepam and fell asleep for 12 hours. He awoke with thigh pain and swelling, and developed rhabdomyolysis (CK 32,520 units/L) and renal failure. He recovered with supportive care (Shen et al, 1999).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Morphine is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Fetal physical dependence, withdrawal symptoms and respiratory difficulties may occur in infants born to mothers physically dependent on opioids. Neonatal withdrawal may be seen in the infants of addicted mothers 12 to 72 hours after birth. Infants may be dehydrated, irritable, and experience tremors and cry continually and may have diarrhea.
    B) Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and World Health Organization state that therapeutic doses of morphine can usually be administered safely during the breastfeeding period, because of the possibility of excess sedation and respiratory depression in the nursing infant, morphine sulfate is not recommended for the nursing mother.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) SubQ administration of morphine resulted in neurological, soft tissue and skeletal abnormalities during animal studies. At doses greater than or equal to 0.15 mg/kg, exencephaly, hydronephrosis, intestinal hemorrhage, split supraoccipital, malformed sternebrae, and malformed xiphoid were also reported (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    2) In animal studies, high parenteral doses of morphine (0.3- to 3-fold the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) on a mg/m(2) basis) given during the second trimester (and frequently maternally toxic) resulted in teratogenicity in neurological, soft and skeletal tissue, including encephalopathy and axial skeletal fusions. Reversible reductions in brain and spinal cord volume were reported when rats were exposed to subcutaneous doses of morphine that were 0.15-fold the MRHD. Mild withdrawal, altered reflex and motor skill development, and altered responsiveness to morphine that persisted into adulthood were reported in fetal animals with chronic morphine exposure (Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2009).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Morphine is classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015; Prod Info KADIAN(R) extended-release oral capsules, 2007)
    2) Opioids cross the placental barrier. Use during pregnancy only if the potential maternal benefit outweighs the potential fetal risk. Use is not recommended immediately during or immediately before labor (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    B) FETAL/NEONATAL ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Prolonged use of opioid analgesics during pregnancy increases the risk of physical dependence in the newborn and neonatal withdrawal syndrome. Symptoms may include poor feeding, diarrhea, irritability, tremor, rigidity, and seizure. Exposed infants may also experience reversible reductions in brain volume, smaller size, decrease ventilatory response to CO2, and an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome. An increased risk of congenital anomalies or malformations has not been reported with morphine use during pregnancy (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    2) Physical dependence, withdrawal symptoms and respiratory difficulties may occur in infants born to mothers physically dependent to opioids (Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2009).
    3) Nineteen narcotic addicted mothers who were pregnant gave birth to infants who demonstrated withdrawal symptoms during the first 24 hours. Adverse clinical findings included hypertonicity, hyperactivity, twitching, convulsions, high-pitched cry, tremors, vomiting, diarrhea, sneezing, and tachypnea. Treatment with chlorpromazine, phenobarbital, or diazepam, for an average 5.4 days resulted in control of these symptoms and follow-ups indicated that the majority of the children developed normally with acceptable physical and mental health. However, 3 patients were noted to have speech retardation (Sardemann et al, 1976).
    4) Morphine has been shown to appear in the fetal circulation within 5 minutes following a single maternal IV injection. Morphine appears to act as a vasoconstrictor of the placental vasculature, causing a significant decrease in the biophysical profile score as a result of absent fetal breathing movements and a nonreactive nonstress test (NST) (Kopecky et al, 2000).
    5) If delivery occurs quickly following an opioid dose to the mother, or after adequate time has passed to allow for maternal clearance, it is unlikely that the fetus would be affected. When maternal-fetal pH difference is minimal, fetal drug can cross back to the maternal side and be eliminated. Fetuses demonstrating significant distress and acidosis and whose mothers received opioids 1 to 3 hours prior to delivery, or multiple doses, may be at increased risk for respiratory depression, which would most likely be multifactorial in origin (Herschel et al, 2000).
    C) LABOR OR DELIVERY
    1) Use is not recommended during or immediately before labor, especially if shorter acting analgesics or alternative analgesic techniques are available. Opioid analgesics may prolong labor by reducing the strength, duration, and frequency of uterine contractions, however, these effects are not consistent and may be offset by an increased rate of cervical dilatation which can shorten labor (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    D) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In animal studies, decreased litter size and viability were reported when male rats were treated with approximately 3-fold the MRHD of morphine 10 days prior to mating. Reversible reductions in testes size and body weight of offspring and reduced fertility in female offspring were reported when rats were exposed to subcutaneous doses of morphine that were 0.15-fold the MRHD. Delayed growth, motor sexual maturation, and decreased male fertility were observed in the offspring of rats and hamsters treated with oral or intraperitoneal morphine throughout gestation at doses that were 0.04 to 0.3-fold the MRHD (Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2009).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) SUMMARY: Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and World Health Organization state that therapeutic doses of morphine can usually be administered safely during the breastfeeding period (Anon, 2001), because of the possibility of excess sedation and respiratory depression in the nursing infant, morphine sulfate is not recommended for the nursing mother (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    2) The American Academy of Pediatrics and World Health Organization state that therapeutic doses of morphine can usually be administered safely during the breastfeeding period (Anon, 2001; Anon, 2002); however, the infant may have a significant blood concentration in some cases (Anon, 2001) and serious adverse effects (eg, excess sedation and respiratory depression) in the nursing infant may occur (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    3) The nursing infant may experience withdrawal symptoms when maternal morphine therapy is discontinued. Infants who were also exposed gestationally at term may be the most likely to exhibit pharmacologically significant levels, but breastfeeding would not be expected to maintain such levels. The manufacturer reports a milk to maternal plasma ratio of 2.5:1. The amount of morphine available to the infant depends upon the maternal plasma concentration, the quantity of breast milk consumed by the infant, and the extent of first-pass metabolism (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015; Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2009; Prod Info Avinza(R), 2002; Prod Info Kadian(R), 1999).
    4) A case report measured serum levels of 4 ng/mL (within the analgesic range) in an infant following morphine use by its mother. The mother received 50 mg every 6 hours during the third trimester for treatment of severe arthritic back pain due to SLE. Although the morphine was discontinued 1 week after delivery, it was resumed 5 days later as a result of maternal withdrawal symptoms. The infant had normal behavior, weight gain, and sleeping patterns, and breastfeeding was continued. Over 10 days, the mother's morphine dose was tapered from 60 mg every 6 hours to 5 mg every 6 hours; the day before the infant measurements the dose was 10 mg every 6 hours. Breast milk samples measured just prior to nursing were 100 ng/mL. The authors estimated a breastfeeding infant may absorb 0.8 to 12% of the maternal dose (Robieux et al, 1990).
    5) Five lactating women were treated with morphine epidurally or IV/IM in a postoperative phase after undergoing surgery. A milk-to-plasma ratio of 2.45 +/- 0.8 was reported. The amount of morphine received by the lactating infant was too low to cause respiratory depression or drowsiness in the child (Feilberg et al, 1989).
    6) In some studies, morphine was undetectable in breast milk following parenteral doses (Anderson, 1977). Other investigators demonstrated measurable levels following a 16 mg parenteral dose, and less than 6 mcg/mL was noted in breastmilk in 4 hours. In some cases, however, levels may be high enough to prolong withdrawal in an infant addicted during gestation (Pagliaro & Levin, 1979).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Adverse effects on fertility were reported in male rats administered subQ morphine sulfate up to 30 mg/kg twice daily prior to and during mating. Adverse effects included reduction in pregnancies, higher incidences of pseudopregnancies, and reduction in implantation sites (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Morphine is primarily used for the treatment of pain. Morphine may be abused for euphoric effects by multiple routes (ie, injection, insufflation, smoking, ingestion).
    B) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is not common, but may be more common in patients with chronic opioid abuse or dependence, and may be life threatening.
    C) PHARMACOLOGY: Morphine binds primarily at the Mu opiate receptors at therapeutic doses. Morphine is an opiate, a group of naturally occurring compounds derived from the poppy, Papaver somniferum.
    D) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils. Mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.
    3) INTRATHECAL INJECTION: Hypotension, respiratory depression, hypertension, CNS depression, agitation, and protracted seizures have been reported after intrathecal morphine overdose.
    4) EPIDURAL OVERDOSE: Even massive large overdoses have only caused CNS and respiratory depression.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Morphine plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens will detect morphine and confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a suspected overdose that may include combination products.
    E) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT and/or lumbar puncture to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) CPK with enzyme fractionation may be useful in severe opioid poisoning cases or when the patient experiences chest pain, seizure or coma. Electrolytes, BUN, creatinine and cardiac markers should be monitored in severely poisoned patients (ie, seizures, persistent mental status changes, hypotension, ventricular dysrhythmias).
    B) LABORATORY INTERFERENCE
    1) POPPY SEEDS - Several studies have shown that ingestion of poppy seeds or poppy seed containing bakery goods may yield measurable urine levels of both codeine and morphine up to 22 hours post-ingestion (Zebelman et al, 1987; Struempler, 1987; Selavka, 1991; Abelson, 1991).
    a) After ingestion of poppy seeds, opioids show up in the urine within 5 hours (Beck et al, 1990).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) CODEINE/MORPHINE RATIO - In an attempt to decide whether urinary opioid levels are due to codeine, morphine, or heroin, urine tests may be used to differentiate between the two. A study using volunteers found that the urinary codeine/morphine ratio was not a reliable indicator of the type of opioid that had been taken (Cone et al, 1991).
    1) The Department of Defense (DOD) and Health and Human Services (HHS) have set an opiate urine screening cutoff concentration of 2000 ng/mL and a confirmation cutoff concentration for total morphine of either 2000 ng/mL (HHS) or 4000 ng/mL (DOD). A specific heroin marker, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), was added to the testing if a urine tested positive for morphine. A cutoff for 6-AM is 10 ng/mL. Urine concentrations above the cutoffs for both morphine and heroin are considered positive for heroin. A urine concentration above the cutoff for morphine but not for heroin is considered positive for morphine (Moore et al, 2001).
    B) URINALYSIS
    1) Monitor for the presence of urinary myoglobin in all cases of suspected or potential rhabdomyolysis.
    C) LABORATORY INTERFERENCE
    1) Quinolones may cause false-positive results for opiate urine screens (Baden et al, 2001).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) HAIR
    a) Past opiate usage can be detected by means of hair analysis as well as the diagnosis of poisoning associated with opiate addiction. Hair analysis may be accomplished by means of radioimmunoassay (RIA), high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Hair analysis may provide both hair drug content and hair profile. A single opiate ingestion may not be detectable through hair analysis, which may be a drawback of this method (Staub, 1993). GC/MS method has been used for analyzing cocaine and its metabolites, opiates, and cannabinoids in human hair (Jurado et al, 1995).

Radiographic Studies

    A) RADIOGRAPHIC-OTHER
    1) Chest x-ray is recommended in patients with pulmonary symptoms.

Methods

    A) SAMPLING
    1) Opioids are qualitatively identified in the urine and are detected in blood for about 12 hours after therapeutic doses.
    a) In an overdose of sustained-release morphine sulfate, morphine and its metabolites were detected in the urine as long as 6 days after the ingestion of an estimated 2500 mg (Westerling et al, 1998).
    B) IMMUNOASSAYS
    1) Semiquantitative and qualitative EMIT(R) homogeneous enzyme immunoassays are available for measurement of the class of opioids in urine. The assays detect morphine, methadone, morphine glucuronide, codeine, and hydromorphone, and higher concentrations of nalorphine and meperidine.
    a) The detection limit (sensitivity) is 0.5 mcg/mL for morphine or its equivalent.
    b) The assays do not detect long-acting methadone, L-alpha-acetyl-methadol (LAAM), or its metabolites.
    c) CDC proficiency testing and clinical studies show this method to correlate well with GC, GLC, HPLC, RIA, and TLC.
    C) FALSE POSITIVE URINE ASSAYS
    1) False positive EMIT II results for urine opiates from therapeutic dosing with ofloxacin have been reported. Results could not be confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Other quinolone antibiotics (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid) did not show potential for false positive opiate results (Meatherall & Dai, 1997).
    a) Levofloxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin were shown to cause false positive opiate results with five different immunoassay testing techniques. Nine of 13 quinolones tested caused assay results above the threshold for a positive result (Baden et al, 2001).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Patients with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a controlled-release formulation has likely been taken; additional doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    B) MODIFIED RELEASE: Any patient developing even minor to moderate opioid effects and any patient requiring naloxone should be admitted to a monitored setting as they are at risk for more severe or prolonged symptoms.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid-naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid-naive.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear. Refer patients for substance abuse counseling if indicated.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with deliberate ingestions, adults with symptoms or ingesting more than a therapeutic dose, or any pediatric ingestion should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment.
    B) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe for at least 4 hours, to ensure that peak plasma levels have been reached and there has been sufficient time for symptoms to develop. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    C) MODIFIED RELEASE: Patients that have ingested a controlled-release morphine preparation have the potential for delayed and prolonged effects and should be observed for at least 12 to 16 hours. The Tmax of many of these preparations is in the range of 7 to 9 hours after therapeutic doses and may be prolonged after overdose. Morphine continues to be released from these preparations adding to the systemic morphine load for up to 48 hours or longer after use.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Morphine plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens will detect morphine and confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a suspected overdose that may include combination products.
    E) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT and/or lumbar puncture to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital GI decontamination is generally not indicated because of the risk of aspiration.
    B) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    1) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    2) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    3) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    4) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    C) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    1) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    a) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    2) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    a) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    3) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    a) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    b) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    4) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    a) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    b) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    c) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    5) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    a) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    b) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    c) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    d) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    6) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    a) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    b) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    c) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    d) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    e) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    1) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    2) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    3) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    4) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    f) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    g) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    7) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    a) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    b) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    c) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    d) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    e) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    8) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    a) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    B) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    1) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    C) CHARCOAL DOSE
    1) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    a) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    a) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    b) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    B) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    3) Case reports suggest that naloxone administration may precipitate severe hypertension in patients with massive intrathecal morphine overdose(Groudine et al, 1995).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    D) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) Patients with massive intrathecal morphine overdose have required barbiturate coma with continuous EEG monitoring to control seizures and myoclonus (Groudine et al, 1995; Sauter et al, 1994; Yilmaz et al, 2003).
    6) RECURRING SEIZURES
    a) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents:
    1) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    2) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
    b) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised.
    c) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003).
    E) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    F) INTRATHECAL INJECTION
    1) Massive intrathecal morphine overdose (cases reported in the range of 250 mg to 510 mg) can cause severe toxicity (Groudine et al, 1995; Sauter et al, 1994; Yilmaz et al, 2003). Immediate attempts to remove as much morphine as possible are recommended for very large intrathecal overdoses. Clinical experience is limited, the following information is derived from experience with intrathecal overdose from a variety of xenobiotics.
    2) POSITIONING - Keep the patient upright if possible to delay the flow of drug to the cisterna magnum (Blaney et al, 1995) (may not be useful unless overdose is recognized immediately if solution is isobaric) (Groudine et al, 1995).
    3) CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DRAINAGE - Immediately remove AT LEAST 20 milliliters of CSF through a lumbar catheter (Kaiser & Bainton, 1987). The optimal amount of CSF to remove is unknown. Adults have tolerated removal of up to 70 milliliters CSF after intrathecal methotrexate overdose(Gosselin & Isbister, 2005; Addiego et al, 1981).
    4) CSF EXCHANGE - Serial removal of 20 milliliter portions of CSF and replacement with corresponding volumes of warmed preservative-free normal saline or lactated ringers should be performed after CSF removal, while preparations for ventriculolumbar perfusion are being made.
    5) VENTRICULOLUMBAR PERFUSION - Consult a neurosurgeon immediately for placement of a ventricular catheter. Infuse warmed, preservative-free saline or lactated ringers through the ventricular catheter and drain fluid from the lumbar catheter(Groudine et al, 1995; Penn & Kroin, 1995; O'Marcaigh et al, 1996). Ventriculolumbar perfusion is likely to be more effective at removing drug from the CSF than simple CSF exchange (Addiego et al, 1981).
    a) DURATION OF VENTRICULOLUMBAR PERFUSION (VLP) - Optimal duration and volume is not clear. It has been suggested that it should be continued for at least 2 to 3 hours, and that benefit may be reduced after that time as morphine will have diffused into the brain (Penn & Kroin, 1995). In one case, the infusion of 900 mL of ringers lactate over 1 hour was associated with a 97% reduction of CSF morphine concentration (Groudine et al, 1995). With other, more toxic agents (primarily cancer chemotherapy agents), an infusion of 80 to 150 mL/hr for a duration of 24 hours has been recommended (Qweider et al, 2007).
    6) Case reports suggest that naloxone administration may precipitate severe hypertension in patients with massive intrathecal morphine overdose(Groudine et al, 1995).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of the large volume of distribution of morphine.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The toxicity of morphine for an individual varies with tolerance developed from habitual use. In general, infants and children have unusual sensitivity to opioid agents. With timely administration of naloxone and respiratory support, patients will generally survive overdoses that would otherwise be lethal. Massive intrathecal overdose (in the range of 250 mg to 510 mg) causes life-threatening toxicity.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) DIARRHEA
    1) ORAL
    a) Recommended dose is 5 to 10 mL (1 to 2 teaspoonfuls) orally, up to 4 times daily (Prod Info PAREGORIC oral liquid, 2012).
    B) PAIN MANAGEMENT
    1) EPIDURAL
    a) DURAMORPH (5 MG/10 ML AND 10 MG/10 ML AMPULS): Initial, 5 mg epidurally daily, adjusting with 1 to 2 mg doses based on patient response; MAX dose: 10 mg daily (Prod Info DURAMORPH intravenous epidural intrathecal injection, 2011).
    b) INFUMORPH (10 MG/ML AND 25 MG/ML AMPULS): Opioid-intolerant, initially 3.5 to 7.5 mg epidurally daily; opioid-tolerant, initially 4.5 to 10 mg epidurally daily; may increase to 20 to 30 mg/day; MAX dose individualized; adjusting based on patient response (Prod Info INFUMORPH 500 continuous infusion injection solution, 2011; Prod Info INFUMORPH 200 continuous infusion injection solution, 2011).
    2) INTRATHECAL
    a) DURAMORPH (5 MG/10 ML AND 10 MG/10 ML AMPULS): A single injection of 0.2 to 1 mg daily; repeated injections not recommended; MAX dose: 10 mg daily (Prod Info DURAMORPH intravenous epidural intrathecal injection, 2011).
    b) INFUMORPH (10 MG/ML AND 25 MG/ML AMPULS): Opioid-intolerant, initially 0.2 to 1 mg intrathecally daily, adjusting based on patient response; opioid-tolerant, initially 1 to 10 mg intrathecally daily, adjusting based on patient response; caution at doses above 20 mg/day (Prod Info INFUMORPH 500 continuous infusion injection solution, 2011).
    3) INTRAMUSCULAR
    a) MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 10 mg subQ or IM every 4 hours; may range from 5 to 20 mg every 4 hours depending on patient requirement and response; NOT for epidural or intrathecal use (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    b) ANALGESIA DURING LABOR: MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 10 mg subQ or IM (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011)
    c) PAIN OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 8 to 15 mg slow IV or IM/subQ; severe pain, additional smaller doses every 3 to 4 hours (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    4) INTRAVENOUS
    a) MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 4 to 10 mg IV very slowly over 4 to 5 minutes; 2.5 to 15 mg strengths may be diluted in 4 to 5 mL of sterile water for injection; NOT for epidural or intrathecal use (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    b) PAIN OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 8 to 15 mg slow IV or IM/subQ; severe pain, additional smaller doses every 3 to 4 hours (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    5) SUBCUTANEOUS
    a) PAIN OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 8 to 15 mg slow IV or IM/subQ; severe pain, additional smaller doses every 3 to 4 hours (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    b) ANALGESIA DURING LABOR: MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML): 10 mg subQ or IM (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011)
    6) ORAL
    a) EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULES
    1) OPIOID-NAIVE AND OPIOID-INTOLERANT: Initial, 30 mg orally every 24 hours. The use of Avinza(R) 90 mg and 120 mg capsules is restricted to opioid-tolerant patients. MAX: 1600 mg/day (Prod Info AVINZA(R) oral extended release capsules, 2014).
    2) Morphine sulfate extended-release formulations should be swallowed whole. DO NOT crush, chew, or dissolve (Prod Info AVINZA(R) oral extended release capsules, 2014).
    b) EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS
    1) MORPHABOND(TM)
    a) Use of 100-mg tablets, single doses greater than 60 mg, or total daily doses greater than 120 mg is restricted to opioid-tolerant patients (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    b) AS FIRST OPIOID ANALGESIC, WHEN NOT OPIOID TOLERANT, OR WHEN CONVERTING FROM OTHER OPIOIDS: Initiate with 15 mg orally every 12 hours (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    c) TITRATION: May titrate dose every 1 to 2 days (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    2) MS CONTIN(R)
    a) OPIOID-NAIVE: Initial, 15 mg orally every 8 or 12 hours; adjust based on patient response (Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) oral extended release tablets, 2014).
    b) Morphine sulfate extended-release formulations should be swallowed whole. DO NOT crush, chew, or dissolve (Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) oral extended release tablets, 2014).
    c) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE TABLETS
    1) OPIOID-NAIVE: Initial, 15 to 30 mg orally every 4 hours; adjust based on patient response (Prod Info Morphine Sulfate oral tablets, 2012).
    d) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE SOLUTION
    1) NOTE: Morphine sulfate oral solution 100 mg per 5 mL (20 mg/mL) is reserved for opioid-tolerant patients only; fatal respiratory depression has resulted from the mistaken interchange of high concentration oral solution with other available oral solutions (eg, 20 mg/5 mL and 10 mg/5 mL) (Roxane Laboratories, 2010).
    2) MORPHINE SULFATE SOLUTION (10 MG/5 ML OR 20 MG/5 ML): OPIOID-NAIVE: Initial, 10 to 20 mg orally every 4 hours, as needed; adjust based on patient response (Prod Info morphine sulfate oral solution, 2013).
    7) RECTAL
    a) Recommended dose is 10 to 20 mg rectally every 4 hours (Prod Info morphine sulfate rectal suppositories, 2010)
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) Safety and effectiveness of oral solutions, oral controlled-release, extended-release, and immediate-release tablets, extended release capsules, rectal suppositories, and epidural/intrathecal solutions (0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, and 25 mg/mL) in pediatric patients have not been established (Prod Info MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, 2015; Prod Info morphine sulfate oral solution, 2013; Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) oral controlled release tablets, 2012; Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) oral extended release tablets, 2014; Prod Info Morphine Sulfate oral tablets, 2012; Prod Info EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2014; Prod Info morphine sulfate rectal suppositories, 2010; Prod Info INFUMORPH 500 continuous infusion injection solution, 2011; Prod Info DURAMORPH intravenous epidural intrathecal injection, 2011).
    B) Safety and effectiveness of IM, IV, or subQ injections (5 mg/mL, 8 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, and 15 mg/mL) in neonates have not been established (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    C) DIARRHEA
    1) ORAL
    a) Recommended dose is 0.25 to 0.5 mL/kg of body weight orally up to 4 times daily (Prod Info PAREGORIC oral liquid, 2012)
    D) PAIN MANAGEMENT
    1) PARENTERAL
    a) MORPHINE SULFATE INJECTIONS (5 MG/ML, 8 MG/ML, 10 MG/ML, and 15 MG/ML), INFANTS AND CHILDREN: 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg subQ, as necessary; MAX single dose: 15 mg; DO NOT administer in neonates and premature infants (Prod Info Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, 2011)
    E) ANALGESIA/SEDATION
    1) Intermittent doses: 0.03 to 0.1 mg/kg/dose IV, IM, or subQ (maximum 0.2 mg/kg; maximum 10 mg/dose). Repeat as required (usually every 2 to 4 hours) (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Miner et al, 2008; Playfor et al, 2006; Brislin & Rose, 2005; Greco & Berde, 2005; van Dijk et al, 2002; Algren & Algren, 1996; Berde et al, 1991).
    2) Continuous infusion: 0.02 to 0.06 mg/kg/hour IV or subQ (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Playfor et al, 2006; Greco & Berde, 2005; van Dijk et al, 2002; Lynn et al, 2000; Peters et al, 1999; Bray et al, 1996; Hendrickson et al, 1990; Beasley & Tibballs, 1987). In a study of postoperative patients, continuous infusion rates of 0.02 mg/kg/hour or less were associated with inadequate pain control (Esmail et al, 1999).
    3) PCA Dosing - 6 years of age and older:
    a) Demand dose: 0.015 to 0.05 mg/kg (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Zernikow et al, 2009; Malviya et al, 1999; Peters et al, 1999; Yaster et al, 1996; Tobias & Rasmussen, 1994; Doyle et al, 1994; Goodarzi et al, 1993).
    b) Lockout interval: 8 to 10 minutes (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Brislin & Rose, 2005; Malviya et al, 1999; Peters et al, 1999).
    c) Basal infusion: 0.004 to 0.01 mg/kg/hour, up to 0.02 mg/kg/hour (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Brislin & Rose, 2005; Peters et al, 1999; Yaster et al, 1996; Doyle et al, 1994). Background infusions greater than 0.01 mg/kg/hour have been associated with more adverse effects without better pain control (Doyle et al, 1993; Doyle et al, 1993a).
    d) 1-hour limit: 0.1 mg/kg (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Brislin & Rose, 2005).
    e) As needed IV rescue dose: 0.05 mg/kg (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Brislin & Rose, 2005).
    F) EPIDURAL (USE PRESERVATIVE-FREE PREPARATION)
    1) Single dose: 0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg (Castillo-Zamora et al, 2005; Cucchiaro et al, 2003; Malviya et al, 1999; Arms et al, 1998; Goodarzi et al, 1993; Sparkes et al, 1989).
    2) Continuous infusion: 0.003 to 0.01 mg/kg/hour (Cucchiaro et al, 2003; Goodarzi, 1999; Malviya et al, 1999; Arms et al, 1998).
    G) ORAL
    1) Immediate-release: Children (less than 50 kg): Usual starting doses, 0.3 mg/kg orally. Repeat as required (usually ever 3 to 4 hours). Maximum 15 to 20 mg/dose for oral solution, and 15 to 30 mg/dose for oral tablets (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Greco & Berde, 2005; Robert et al, 2003).
    H) EXTENDED RELEASE
    1) Children (less than 50 kg): initial, 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg orally every 8 to 12 hours. (Kraemer & Rose, 2009). Maximum 30 to 45 mg/dose (Greco & Berde, 2005). For the treatment of cancer-related pain, mean morphine dose requirements were greater in younger patients when compared with older patients; less than 7 years, 2.6 mg/kg/day; 7 to 12 years, 2 mg/kg/day; over 12 years, 1.4 mg/kg/day (Zernikow & Lindena, 2001). A pharmacokinetic study in children receiving morphine for cancer-related pain supports initial dosing of 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/day (Hunt et al, 1999).
    I) NEONATAL ABSTINENCE SYNDROME
    1) Initial dose: 0.03 to 0.1 mg/kg per dose orally every 3 to 4 hours. Wean dose by 10% to 20% every 2 to 3 days based on abstinence scoring. Use a 0.4-mg/mL dilution made from a concentrated oral morphine sulfate solution (Burgos & Burke, 2009; Jansson et al, 2009).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) PEDIATRIC
    1) ORAL
    a) CASE REPORT: An 8-year-old girl (37 kg) died after taking 1 to 2 teaspoons of a solution of 20 mg/mL morphine. The estimated dose of morphine was 100 mg to 200 mg (2.7 mg/kg to 5.4 mg/kg). The error occurred due to inadvertent dispensing of Roxanol(R) instead of the prescribed meperidine (Poklis et al, 1995).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) PEDIATRIC
    1) INTRAMUSCULAR
    a) CASE REPORT: A 4-week-old infant (3.32 kg) with microcephaly inadvertently received 4 mg morphine intramuscularly for procedural sedation instead of the intended 4 mg meperidine. He developed apnea and cardiac arrest which responded to resuscitation. He had recurrent episodes of CNS depression, and required repeated doses of intramuscular naloxone (15 doses, the first dose 75 minutes after morphine administration, the last dose 27 hours after morphine administration, cumulative dose of 2.73 mg naloxone). He recovered without apparent sequelae (Gober et al, 1979).
    B) ADOLESCENT
    1) ORAL
    a) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old asthmatic boy developed respiratory distress and pulmonary hemorrhage after ingesting approximately 15 controlled-release morphine sulfate 200 mg. Following a prolonged supportive care, he gradually recovered and was discharged home on day 18 (Porter & O'Reilly, 2011).
    C) ADULT
    1) SUBCUTANEOUS
    a) CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old woman treated with continuous intrathecal morphine infusion for intractable pain inadvertently received 480 mg morphine subcutaneously during refilling of her pump. She developed lethargy about 2 hours later, with respiratory depression. She was treated with naloxone and recovered (Wu & Patt, 1992).
    b) CASE REPORT: Loss of consciousness and severe memory impairment developed in a 40-year-old man after using five 200 mg ampoules of morphine in a suicide attempt. Deficiencies in memory remained up to 4 months after exposure (Landais, 2014).
    2) INTRAVENOUS
    a) CASE REPORT: Two patients received intravenous overdoses of morphine because of malfunctioning patient controlled analgesia pumps. A 30-year-old man received 25 mg of morphine over 5 minutes and developed mild drowsiness only. A 72-year-old man received a total morphine dose of 40 mg over 25 minutes (10 mg over 24 minutes and then a 30 mg bolus) and became drowsy. Both recovered with supportive care (Kwan, 1996).
    3) EPIDURAL
    a) CASE REPORT: 400 mg of morphine was accidentally given to a healthy woman epidurally. With respiratory support and naloxone therapy, she recovered (Dahl & Jacobsen, 1990).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman inadvertently received 40 mg of morphine epidurally for postoperative pain control (intended dose 4 mg). One hour later, she complained of visual disturbances, nausea, vomiting, and agitation. She was noted to have miotic pupils for the next 12 hours. She did not require any treatment (Zeyneloglu et al, 2006).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old woman inadvertently received two 50 mg doses of epidural morphine 10 hours apart for pain control after gastric bypass surgery. She developed drowsiness and mild respiratory depression, and was treated with a single 0.4 mg dose of naloxone (Robinson et al, 1984).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman inadvertently received 400 mg of morphine epidurally for postoperative pain control. Within 25 minutes, she became somnolent and developed respiratory depression with central and peripheral cyanosis. She responded to treatment with oxygen and naloxone. She was treated with naloxone for 26 hours (intermittent boluses followed by a continuous infusion) and recovered (Dahl & Jacobsen, 1990a).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 58-year-old man inadvertently received 60 mg of epidural morphine for postoperative pain control. He developed transient ST depression on ECG, mild respiratory depression, and somnolence. For 22 hours, he was treated with intermittent naloxone boluses followed by a continuous infusion, and recovered uneventfully(Masoud & Green, 1982).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old man on chronic epidural morphine infusion for pain related to invasive cancer, inadvertently received a 750 mg epidural bolus of morphine during an attempt to refill his infusion pump. He developed immediate somnolence and respiratory depression, which reversed with intravenous naloxone. He remained somnolent and was treated with a naloxone infusion for 48 hours. He recovered without sequelae (Salva & Kuhn, 1987).
    4) INTRATHECAL
    a) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman developed drowsiness, headache, diplopia, and progressively generalized seizures following inadvertent direct administration of a 35-mL (510 mg) bolus intrathecal injection of morphine, which was intended to be administered into her slow-release subcutaneous pump. The patient gradually recovered following administration of thiopental infusion, for her seizures, and intravenous naloxone (Yilmaz et al, 2003).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 81-year-old man was inadvertently given 5 mg of morphine intrathecally instead of the intended 0.5 mg for postoperative pain. He became somnolent 4 hours later. At this time, 50 mL of CSF was removed via the spinal catheter and replaced with 50 mL sterile normal saline, and the patient awakened (Kaiser & Bainton, 1987).
    c) CASE SERIES: Four patients, aged 61 ot 90 years, inadvertently received 15 mg of morphine intrathecally instead of the intended 1.5 mg for spinal anaesthesia. All developed drowsiness, apnea, and cyanosis 1.5 hour postoperatively. They were intubated and treated with nalorphine, and were extubated after 24 hours with no other sequelae (Pomonis et al, 1986).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman on chronic intrathecal morphine infusion for back pain inadvertently received an intrathecal bolus dose of 450 mg of morphine during an attempted pump refill. She became drowsy, then restless, developed severe hypertension (250/150 mm Hg), status epilepticus and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A lumbar drain was placed, and 12 mL of CSF was removed and then it was set for continuous drainage at 10 mL per hour (a total of 550 mL CSF was removed over 2.5 days). She was treated with nitroprusside, naloxone infusion, diazepam, phenytoin, phenobarbital, pentobarbital, ICP monitoring, and continuous EEG monitoring, and recovered over the next 72 hours (Sauter et al, 1994).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old woman treated with chronic intrathecal morphine infusion for sever reflex sympathetic dystrophy inadvertently received 250 mg morphine intrathecally during placement of a new intrathecal catheter. She developed hypotension (60 mm Hg systolic) which was treated with naloxone infusion and ephedrine. She then developed hypertension (200 mm Hg systolic), and became short of breath, restless, agitated, and incoherent. She was intubated, hypertension persisted despite labetalol and hydralazine, and she developed myoclonic status epilepticus. Hypertension resolved when naloxone was discontinued. She received thiopental, pentobarbital, vecuronium and continuous EEG monitoring. A cervical spinal catheter was placed at the C1-C2 interspace, and 900 mL of warmed lactated ringer was infused over one hour and drained through 2 lumbar spinal needles. This was associated with a 97% reduction in CSF morphine concentrations. She gradually improved and was extubated on the 3rd day. At three weeks follow up she had no demonstrable sequelae (Groudine et al, 1995).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old woman inadvertently received 25 mg of morphine intrathecally instead of the intended bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for a cesarian section. She was treated with a naloxone infusion. She developed transient hypertension intraoperatively. She became somnolent and had mild respiratory depression 3 hours after the injection, and responded to an increase in the naloxone infusion. Naloxone infusion was discontinued after 24 hours and she recovered uneventfully. No toxicity was noted in the neonate (Cannesson et al, 2002).
    g) CASE REPORT: An 81-year-old woman received 60 mcg of morphine and 2.5 mcg of sufentanyl intrathecally for spinal anesthesia for a hysterectomy. She did well in the immediate postoperative period, then was found unresponsive 3.5 hours after the block was administered. She was lethargic, with miotic pupils, shortness of breath, and no response to painful stimuli; blood glucose and blood pressure were normal. She was treated with oxygen and then repeated doses of naloxone, and regained consciousness after the sixth ampule of naloxone. She gradually became somnolent again and was treated with a naloxone infusion, which was discontinued 18 hours after the anesthesia was administered (a total of 16 mg naloxone was administered). She recovered completely (Rutili et al, 2007).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old asthmatic boy developed respiratory distress and pulmonary hemorrhage after ingesting approximately 15 controlled-release morphine sulfate 200 mg. A very high morphine serum concentration of 0.65 mg/L was obtained. Following a prolonged supportive care, he gradually recovered and was discharged on day 18 (Porter & O'Reilly, 2011).
    2) Blood concentrations in 10 fatalities involving intravenous administration of morphine ranged from 0.2 to 2.3 mcg/gram by gas chromatography after acid hydrolysis and silylation (Felby et al, 1974).
    3) A computer-assisted model found that, in forensic cases, unconjugated morphine in the blood was the most predictive item of time of death and whether death was due to morphine overdose (Spiehler, 1989).
    4) MORPHINE SULFATE TABLETS: Plasma morphine concentration was reported to be 500 nanograms/mL (normal therapeutic, 11 to 19 nanograms/mL) in a 14-year-old girl several hours after ingestion of an unknown quantity of morphine sulfate 30 mg tablets. The girl developed atypical leukoencephalopathy, and after one year, recovery was incomplete (Nanan et al, 2000).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Morphine is a pure opioid agonists that is a natural derivative of the poppy Papaver somniferum. At therapeutic doses it is relatively selective for the Mu receptor (Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009). Pharmacologic effects include anxiolysis, euphoria, relaxation, respiratory depression, constipation, miosis, cough suppression, and analgesia (Prod Info MS CONTIN(R) controlled-release oral tablets, 2006; Prod Info Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, 2009).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects (Nelson, 2006).
    B) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION: Respiration, which is controlled mainly through medullary respiratory centers with peripheral input from chemoreceptors and other sources, is affected by opioids which produce inhibition at chemoreceptors via Mu (OP3) opioid receptors and in the medulla via mu and delta receptors. Tolerance develops more quickly to euphoria and other effects than to respiratory effects (White & Irvine, 1999).

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) Abelson JL: Urine drug testing: watch what you eat! (letter). JAMA 1991; 266:3130-3131.
    3) Addiego JE, Ridgway D, & Bleyer WA: The acute management of intrathecal methotrexate overdose: pharmacologic rationale and guidelines. J Pediatr 1981; 98(5):825-828.
    4) Algren JT & Algren CL: Sedation and analgesia for minor pediatric procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996; 12(6):435-441.
    5) Anderson PO: Drugs and breast feeding - a review. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1977; 11:208-223.
    6) Anon: American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: The transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 2001; 108(3):776-789.
    7) Anon: Breastfeeding and Maternal Medication. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
    8) Arms DM, Smith JT, Osteyee J, et al: Postoperative epidural analgesia for pediatric spine surgery. Orthopedics 1998; 21(5):539-544.
    9) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    10) Baden LR, Horowitz G, & Jacoby H: Quinolones and false-positive urine screening for opiates by immunoassay technology. J Amer Med Assc 2001; 286:3115-3119.
    11) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    12) Beasley SW & Tibballs J: Efficacy and safety of continuous morphine infusion for postoperative analgesia in the paediatric surgical ward. Aust N Z J Surg 1987; 57(4):233-237.
    13) Beck O, Vitols S, & Stensio M: Positive urine screening for opiates after consumption of sandwich bread with poppy seed flavoring (letter). Ther Drug Monit 1990; 12:585-586.
    14) Berde CB, Beyer JE, Bournaki MC, et al: Comparison of morphine and methadone for prevention of postoperative pain in 3- to 7-year-old children. J Pediatr 1991; 119(1 Pt 1):136-41.
    15) Blaney SM, Poplack DG, Godwin K, et al: Effect of body position on ventricular CSF methotrexate concentration following intralumbar administration. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(1):177-179.
    16) Bray RJ, Woodhams AM, Vallis CJ, et al: A double-blind comparison of morphine infusion and patient controlled analgesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1996; 6(2):121-127.
    17) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    18) Brislin RP & Rose JB: Pediatric acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2005; 23(4):789-814, x.
    19) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    20) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    21) Burgos AE & Burke BL: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. Neoreviews 2009; 10(5):e222-e229.
    22) Cannesson M, Nargues N, Bryssine B, et al: Intrathecal morphine overdose during combined spinal-epidural block for Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89(6):925-927.
    23) Castillo-Zamora C, Castillo-Peralta LA, & Nava-Ocampo AA: Dose minimization study of single-dose epidural morphine in patients undergoing hip surgery under regional anesthesia with bupivacaine. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15(1):29-36.
    24) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    25) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    26) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    27) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    28) Cone EJ, Welch P, & Paul BD: Forensic drug testing for opiates, III. Urinary excretion rates of morphine and codeine following codeine administration. J Anal Toxicol 1991; 15:161-166.
    29) Cucchiaro G, Dagher C, Baujard C, et al: Side-effects of postoperative epidural analgesia in children: a randomized study comparing morphine and clonidine. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13(4):318-323.
    30) Dahl JB & Jacobsen JB: Accidental epidural narcotic overdose. Anesth Analg 1990; 70:321-322.
    31) Dahl JB & Jacobsen JB: Accidental epidural narcotic overdose. Anesth Analg 1990a; 70(3):321-322.
    32) Doyle E, Harper I, & Morton NS: Patient-controlled analgesia with low dose background infusions after lower abdominal surgery in children. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71(6):818-822.
    33) Doyle E, Mottart KJ, Marshall C, et al: Comparison of different bolus doses of morphine for patient-controlled analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72(2):160-163.
    34) Doyle E, Robinson D, & Morton NS: Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with and without a background infusion after lower abdominal surgery in children. Br J Anaesth 1993a; 71(5):670-673.
    35) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    36) Esmail Z, Montgomery C, Courtrn C, et al: Efficacy and complications of morphine infusions in postoperative paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9(4):321-327.
    37) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    38) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    39) Feilberg VL, Rosenberg D, Broen Christensen C, et al: Excretion of morphine in human breast milk. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33:426-428.
    40) Felby S, Christensen H, & Lund A: Morphine concentrations in blood and organs in cases of fatal poisoning. Forensic Sci 1974; 3:77-81.
    41) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    42) Fisher AP, Hanna M, & Rhodes SP: Spinal level analgesia after morphine overdose?. Lancet 1987; 1(8532):573.
    43) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    44) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    45) Glare PA, Walsh TD, & Pippenger CE: Normorphine, a neurotoxic metabolite?. Lancet 1990; 335:725-726.
    46) Glassroth J, Adams GD, & Schnoll S: The impact of substance abuse on the respiratory system. Chest 1987; 91:596-602.
    47) Gober AE, Kearns GL, Yokel RA, et al: Repeated naloxone administration for morphine overdose in a 1-month-old infant. Pediatrics 1979; 63(4):606-608.
    48) Gock SB, Wong SH, Stormo KA, et al: Self-intoxication with morphine obtained from an infusion pump. J Anal Toxicol 1999; 23(2):130-133.
    49) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    50) Goodarzi M, Shier NH, & Ogden JA: Epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain after orthopaedic procedures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1993; 13(5):663-667.
    51) Goodarzi M: Comparison of epidural morphine, hydromorphone and fentanyl for postoperative pain control in children undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9(5):419-422.
    52) Gosselin S & Isbister GK: Re: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(8):609-610.
    53) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    54) Greco C & Berde C: Pain management for the hospitalized pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin North Am 2005; 52(4):995-1027.
    55) Groudine SB, Cresanti-Daknis C, & Lumb PD: Successful treatment of a massive intrathecal morphine overdose. Anesthesiology 1995; 82(1):292-295.
    56) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    57) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    58) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    59) Hendrickson M, Myre L, Johnson DG, et al: Postoperative analgesia in children: a prospective study in intermittent intramuscular injection versus continuous intravenous infusion of morphine. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25(2):185-190.
    60) Herschel M, Khoshnood B, & Lass NA: Role of naloxone in newborn resuscitation. Pediatrics 2000; 106:831-835.
    61) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    62) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    63) Hunt A, Joel S, Dick G, et al: Population pharmacokinetics of oral morphine and its glucuronides in children receiving morphine as immediate-release liquid or sustained-release tablets for cancer pain. J Pediatr 1999; 135:47-55.
    64) Jaffe JH & Martin WR: Opioid analgesics and antagonists. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 8th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 485-521.
    65) Jansson LM, Velez M, & Harrow C: The opioid-exposed newborn: assessment and pharmacologic management. J Opioid Manag 2009; 5(1):47-55.
    66) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    67) Jurado C, Gimenez MP, & Menendez M: Simultaneous quantification of opiates, cocaine and cannabinoids in hair. Foren Sci Internat 1995; 70:165-174.
    68) Kaiser KG & Bainton CR: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid. Anesth Analg 1987; 66(5):475-477.
    69) Kaiser KG & Bainton CR: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid. Anesth Analg 1987a; 66:475-477.
    70) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    71) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    72) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    73) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    74) Kopecky EA, Ryan ML, Barrett JFR, et al: Fetal response to maternally administered morphine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:424-430.
    75) Kraemer FW & Rose JB: Pharmacologic management of acute pediatric pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2009; 27(2):241-268.
    76) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    77) Kwan A: Morphine overdose from patient-controlled analgesia pumps. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24(2):254-256.
    78) Landais A: Severe memory impairment following acute morphine intoxication. J Neurol Sci 2014; 343(1-2):242-244.
    79) Larijani GE, Goldberg ME, & Rogers KH: Treatment of opioid-induced pruritus with ondansetron: report of four patients. Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16(5):958-960.
    80) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    81) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    82) Lynn AM, Nespeca MK, Bratton SL, et al: Intravenous morphine in postoperative infants: intermittent bolus dosing versus targeted continuous infusions. Pain 2000; 88(1):89-95.
    83) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    84) Malviya S, Pandit UA, Merkel S, et al: A comparison of continuous epidural infusion and intermittent intravenous bolus doses of morphine in children undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24(5):438-443.
    85) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    86) Masoud PJ & Green CD: Effects of massive overdose of epidural morphine sulphate. Can Anaesth Soc J 1982; 29(4):377-380.
    87) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    88) Meatherall R & Dai J: False-positive EMIT II opiates from ofloxacin. Ther Drug Monitor 1997; 19:98-99.
    89) Miner JR, Moore J, Gray RO, et al: Oral versus intravenous opioid dosing for the initial treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15(12):1234-1240.
    90) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    91) Moore KA, Addison J, & Levine B: Applicability of opiate cutoffs to opiate intoxication cases (letter). J Analy Toxicol 2001; 25:657-658.
    92) Murray S & Wooltorton E: Alcohol-associated rapid release of a long-acting opioid. CMAJ 2005; 173(7):756.
    93) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    94) Nanan R, von Stockhausen HB, & Petersen B: Unusual pattern of leukoencephalopathy after morphine sulphate intoxication. Neuroradiology 2000; 42:845-848.
    95) Nelson L: Opioids. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    96) Nelson LS: Opioids, in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 6th ed, Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT, 1998.
    97) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    98) O'Marcaigh AS, Johnson CM, & Smithson WA: Successful treatment of intrathecal methotrexate overdose by using ventriculolumbar perfusion and trathecal instillation of carboxypeptidase G2. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71:161-165.
    99) Osborne RJ, Joel SP, & Slevin ML: Morphine intoxication in renal failure: the role of morphine-6-glucuronide. Br Med J 1986; 292:1548-1549.
    100) Pagliaro LA & Levin RHPagliaro LA & Levin RH: Problems in Pediatric Drug Therapy, Drug Intell Publications, Hamilton, IL, 1979.
    101) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    102) Penn RD & Kroin JS: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose. J Neurosurg 1995; 82(1):147-148.
    103) Peters JW, Bandell Hoekstra IE, Huijer Abu-Saad H, et al: Patient controlled analgesia in children and adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9(3):235-241.
    104) Playfor S, Jenkins I, Boyles C, et al: Consensus guidelines on sedation and analgesia in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(8):1125-1136.
    105) Poklis A, Edinboro LE, Wohler AS, et al: Fatal morphine poisoning in a child due to accidental oral ingestion. Forensic Sci Int 1995; 76(1):55-59.
    106) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    107) Pomonis SP, Economacos G, & Costopanajiocoy SP: Overdose of intrathecal morphine. Anaesthesia 1986; 41(6):670-.
    108) Porter R & O'Reilly H: Pulmonary hemorrhage: a rare complication of opioid overdose. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27(8):742-744.
    109) Product Information: AVINZA(R) extended-release oral capsules, morphine sulfate extended-release oral capsules. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, San Diego, CA, 2005.
    110) Product Information: AVINZA(R) oral extended release capsules, morphine sulfate oral extended release capsules. Pfizer Inc (per FDA), New York, NY, 2014.
    111) Product Information: AVINZA(R) oral extended-release capsules, morphine sulfate oral extended-release capsules. King Pharmaceuticals Inc. (per FDA), Bristol, TN, 2012.
    112) Product Information: Avinza(R), morphine extended-release capsule. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA, 2005.
    113) Product Information: Avinza(R), morphine sulfate extended release capsules. Ligand Phamaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA, 2002.
    114) Product Information: DURAMORPH intravenous epidural intrathecal injection, morphine sulfate intravenous epidural intrathecal injection. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    115) Product Information: DURAMORPH(TM) IV, epidural or intrathecal injection, morphine sulfate IV, epidural or intrathecal injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 2005.
    116) Product Information: DepoDur(R) extended-release epidural injection, morphine sulfate extended-release epidural injection. EKR Therapeutics Inc, Bedminster, NJ, 2008.
    117) Product Information: EMBEDA(R) oral extended release capsules, morphine sulfate naltrexone HCl oral extended release capsules. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Bristol, TN, 2013.
    118) Product Information: EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, morphine sulfate and naltrexone hcl oral extended-release capsules. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol, TN, 2009.
    119) Product Information: EMBEDA(R) oral extended-release capsules, morphine sulfate naltrexone HCl oral extended-release capsules. Pfizer Inc. (per FDA), New York, NY, 2014.
    120) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    121) Product Information: INFUMORPH 200 continuous infusion injection solution, morphine sulfate (200 mg/20 mL) continuous infusion injection solution. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (per Dailymed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    122) Product Information: INFUMORPH 500 continuous infusion injection solution, morphine sulfate (500 mg/20 mL) continuous infusion injection solution. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (per Dailymed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    123) Product Information: INFUMORPH(TM)200,INFUMORPH(TM)500 epidural, intrathecal solution, Preservative-free Morphine Sulfate epidural, intrathecal solution. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 2004.
    124) Product Information: KADIAN(R) extended-release oral capsules, morphine sulfate extended-release oral capsules. Alpharma Branded Products Division,Inc, Piscataway, NJ, 2006.
    125) Product Information: KADIAN(R) extended-release oral capsules, morphine sulfate extended-release oral capsules. Alpharma Branded Products Division,Inc, Piscataway, NJ, 2007.
    126) Product Information: KADIAN(R) extended-release oral capsules, morphine sulfate extended-release oral capsules. Actavis Kadian LLC, Morristown, NJ, 2009.
    127) Product Information: KADIAN(R) oral extended-release capsules, morphine sulfate oral extended-release capsules. Actavis Kadian LLC (per FDA), Morristown, NJ, 2012.
    128) Product Information: Kadian(R), morphine sulfate. Faulding Laboratories, Raleigh, NC, 1999.
    129) Product Information: MORPHABOND(TM) oral extended-release tablets, morphine sulfate oral extended-release tablets. Inspirion Delivery Technologies LLC (per FDA), Valley Cottage, NY, 2015.
    130) Product Information: MS CONTIN(R) controlled-release oral tablets, morphine sulfate controlled-release oral tablets. Purdue Pharma LP, Stamford, CT, 2006.
    131) Product Information: MS CONTIN(R) controlled-release oral tablets, morphine sulfate controlled-release oral tablets. Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, 2009.
    132) Product Information: MS CONTIN(R) oral controlled release tablets, morphine sulfate oral controlled release tablets. Purdue Pharma L.P. (per FDA), Stamford, CT, 2012.
    133) Product Information: MS CONTIN(R) oral extended release tablets, morphine sulfate oral extended release tablets. Purdue Pharma L.P. (per FDA), Stamford, CT, 2014.
    134) Product Information: Morphine Sulfate Rectal Suppositories. Paddock Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, 2001.
    135) Product Information: Morphine Sulfate oral tablets, morphine sulfate oral tablets. Roxane Laboratories (per FDA), Columbus, OH, 2012.
    136) Product Information: Morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection, morphine sulfate intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous injection. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    137) Product Information: Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution, Morphine sulfate oral tablets, solution. Roxane Laboratories Inc, Columbus, OH, 2009.
    138) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    139) Product Information: ORAMORPH(R) SR sustained-release oral tablets, morphine sulfate sustained-release oral tablets. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Newport, KY, 2006.
    140) Product Information: PAREGORIC oral liquid, morphine oral liquid. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (per DailyMed), Amityville, NY, 2012.
    141) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    142) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    143) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    144) Product Information: morphine sulfate extended-release oral tablets, morphine sulfate extended-release oral tablets. Mallinckrodt Inc., Hazelwood, MO, 2009.
    145) Product Information: morphine sulfate intravenous solution, USP, morphine sulfate intravenous solution, USP. Faulding Pharmaceutical Co, Paramus, NJ, 2003.
    146) Product Information: morphine sulfate oral solution, morphine sulfate oral solution. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. (per DailyMed), Detroit, MI, 2013.
    147) Product Information: morphine sulfate rectal suppositories, morphine sulfate rectal suppositories. Paddock Laboratories Inc, Minneapolis, MN, 2010.
    148) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    149) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    150) Quevedo F & Walsh D: Morphine-induced ventilatory failure after spinal cord compression. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 18(2):140-142.
    151) Qweider M, Gilsbach JM, & Rohde V: Inadvertent intrathecal vincristine administration: a neurosurgical emergency. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6(3):280-283.
    152) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    153) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    154) Remskar M, Noc M, & Leskovsek B: Profound circulatory shock following heroin overdose. Resuscitation 1998; 38:51-53.
    155) Robert R, Brack A, Blakeney P, et al: A double-blind study of the analgesic efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and oral morphine in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing change and tubbing. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003; 24(6):351-355.
    156) Robieux I, Koren G, Vandenbergh H, et al: Morphine excretion in breast milk and resultant exposure of a nursing infant. Clin Toxicol 1990; 28:365-370.
    157) Robinson RJ, Lenis S, & Elliot M: Accidental epidural narcotic overdose. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984; 31(5):594-595.
    158) Roxane Laboratories: Dear Healthcare Professional Letter: Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 100mg per 5 mL. Roxane Laboratories. Columbus, OH. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/UCM239561.pdf. As accessed 2011-01-11.
    159) Rutili A, Maggiani M, Bertelloni C, et al: Persistent overdose caused by a very small dose of intrathecal morphine in an elderly patient undergoing vaginal hysterectomy: a case report. Minerva Anestesiol 2007; 73(7-8):433-436.
    160) Salazar R & Dubow J: Delayed posthypoxic leukoencephalopathy following a morphine overdose. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19(7):1060-1062.
    161) Salva KM & Kuhn JG: Overdose of morphine sulfate injection during refilling of an implanted infusion pump. Clin Pharm 1987; 6(7):577-580.
    162) Sardemann H, Madsen KS, & Friis-Hansen B: Follow-up of children of drug-addicted mothers. Arch Dis Child 1976; 51:131-134.
    163) Sauter K, Kaufman HH, Bloomfield SM, et al: Treatment of high-dose intrathecal morphine overdose. case report. J Neurosurg 1994; 81(1):143-146.
    164) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    165) Selavka CM: Poppy seed ingestion as a contributing factor to opiate-positive urinalysis results: the Pacific perspective. J Forensic Sci 1991; 36:685-696.
    166) Shen CH, Hung CJ, Wu CC, et al: Rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure after morphine overdose--a case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1999; 37(3):159-162.
    167) Shenkman Z, Ornstein E, & Adler D: Drug overdose as a consequence of misuse of a syringe pump. Anesth Analg 1995; 81(3):652-653.
    168) Sparkes ML, Klein AS, Duhaime AC, et al: Use of epidural morphine for control of postoperative pain in selective dorsal rhizotomy for spasticity. Pediatr Neurosci 1989; 15(5):229-232.
    169) Spiehler VR: Computer-assisted interpretation in forensic toxicology: morphine-involved deaths. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34:1104-1115.
    170) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    171) Staub C: Hair analysis: its importance for the diagnosis of poisoning associated with opiate addiction. Forensic Science International 1993; 63(1-3):69-75.
    172) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    173) Struempler RE: Excretion of codeine and morphine following ingestion of poppy seeds. J Analytical Toxicol 1987; 11:97-99.
    174) Syed S, Paul JE, Hueftlein M, et al: Morphine overdose from error propagation on an acute pain service. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53(6):586-590.
    175) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    176) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    177) Tobias JD & Rasmussen GE: Pain management and sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Clin North Am 1994; 41(6):1269-1292.
    178) Ueyama H, Nishimura M, & Tashiro C: Nalaxone reversal of nystagmus associated with intrathecal morphine administration (letter). Anesthesiology 1992; 76:153.
    179) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    180) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    181) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    182) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    183) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    184) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    185) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    186) Westerling D, Sawe J, & Eklundh G: Near fatal intoxication with controlled- release morphine tablets in a depressed woman. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42:586-589.
    187) White JM & Irvine RJ: Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose (review). Addiction 1999; 94:961-972.
    188) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    189) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    190) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    191) Wu CL & Patt RB: Accidental overdose of systemic morphine during intended refill of intrathecal infusion device. Anesth Analg 1992; 75(1):130-132.
    192) Yaster M, Kost-Byerly S, Berde C, et al: The management of opioid and benzodiazepine dependence in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 1996; 98(1):135-140.
    193) Yilmaz A, Sogut A, Kilinc M, et al: Successful treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose. Neurol India 2003; 51:410-412.
    194) Zebelman AM, Troyer BL, & Randall GL: Detection of morphine and codeine following consumption of poppy seeds. J Analytical Toxicol 1987; 11:131-132.
    195) Zernikow B & Lindena G: Long-acting morphine for pain control in paediatric oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001; 36(4):451-458.
    196) Zernikow B , Michel E , Craig F , et al: Pediatric palliative care: use of opioids for the management of pain. Paediatr Drugs 2009; 11(2):129-151.
    197) Zeyneloglu P, Karaaslan P, Kizilkan A, et al: An unusual adverse effect of an accidental epidural morphine overdose. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23(12):1061-1062.
    198) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    199) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.
    200) van Dijk M, Bouwmeester NJ, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al: Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent morphine administration after major surgery in 0-3-year-old infants; a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2002; 98(3):305-313.