MOBILE VIEW  | 

MERCURY, ORGANIC

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Many forms of mercury exist. These major forms can be classified as elemental mercury, inorganic mercury (e.g., inorganic salts), and organic mercury. This document concerns organic mercury compounds, in general.
    B) ORGANIC MERCURY exists in aryl form (phenylmercuric acetate) or in short or long alkyl groups.
    1) Organic mercury compounds do not have primary uses as therapeutic agents. The key route of exposure is through the gastrointestinal tract. Absorption through the skin and respiratory system may occur. Certain organic mercury compounds are CNS, GASTROINTESTINAL AND RENAL TOXINS. Some compounds produce adverse DEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTS. Other effects have been reported.

Specific Substances

    A) Ethyl Mercuric Chloride
    1) Ceresan
    2) Chloroethylmercury
    3) Ethylmercuric Chloride
    4) Granosan
    5) CAS 107-27-7
    Merbromin
    1) Bromochromium
    2) Mercurochrome
    3) CAS 129-16-8
    Methyl Mercury (Short-chain, alkyl mercury)
    1) Mercury (1+), Methyl-
    2) Mercury (1+), Methyl, ion
    3) Methylmercury ion
    4) Methylmercury ion (1+)
    5) Methylmercury (II) cation
    6) CAS 22967-92-6
    Phenylmercury Compounds (Long-chain aryl mercury)
    1) Phenylmercuric Acetate (CAS 62-38-4)
    2) Phenylmercuric Oleate (CAS 104-60-9)
    Thimerosal (Long-chain aryl mercury)
    1) Ethylmercurithiosalicylic Acid, Sodium Salt
    2) Mercurothiolate
    3) Merthiolate Sodium
    4) Sodium Ethylmercurithiosalicylate
    5) Thiomersalate
    6) CAS 54-64-8
    References
    1) (Gosselin et al, 1984; Sax & Lewis, 1987a; Budavari, 1996a; Klaassen, 1990)

    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) Hg

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) BASIC PHYSICAL FORM
    a) Organic mercury compounds contain mercury with a covalent bond to at least one carbon atom (Klaassen, 1990). Most of the organic mercury compounds are crystals, granules, scales or powders, which may be incorporated into other preparations. Some organic mercury compounds (e.g., dimethylmercury, methyl mercury) are volatile (IARC, 1993; Proctor et al, 1989). Exposure to vapors, particles, dusts or aerosols can occur.
    2) CLASSIFICATION
    a) Organic mercury compounds can be further divided into three classes (Gosselin et al, 1984; Sax & Lewis, 1987; Bryson, 1989):
    1) ARYL COMPOUNDS: Have a Hg-to-carbon bond with phenol, cresol, toluene, benzene or another aromatic ring. Commonly encountered members of this class are the phenylmercuric salts which are used to prevent fungal growth on seeds (Gosselin et al, 1984).
    2) ALKOXYALKYL COMPOUNDS: The fungicides methoxyethylmercuric chloride and methoxyethyl mercuric acetate are members of this class (Gosselin et al, 1984).
    3) ALKYL COMPOUNDS: Have at least one strong covalent bond with a carbon atom (CnH2n+1). Methyl, ethyl, butyl and propyl mercury compounds are included in this class (Gosselin et al, 1984; Bryson, 1989).
    4) These classes can be further divided into 2 subgroups, based on their toxicological properties.
    3) TOXICOLOGICAL SUBCLASSIFICATION
    a) Organic mercurials can be subclassified based on the ease with which the organic moiety dissociates (in the body) from the anion to yield inorganic mercury (Bryson, 1989).
    1) FIRST SUBCLASS (LONG-CHAIN, ARYL OR ALKYL COMPOUNDS): The organic moiety readily dissociates from these compounds after absorption. Examples of members in this group include the alkoxyalkyl (e.g., methoxyethylmercuric chloride) and aryl compounds (eg; thimerosol). These compounds may be similar toxicologically to INORGANIC MERCURY but with greater absorption and distribution. These compounds are generally less toxic than compounds in the second subclass.
    2) SECOND SUBCLASS (SHORT-CHAIN, ALKYL COMPOUNDS): This class includes compounds which have at least one strong covalent bond with a carbon atom. The mercury-carbon bonds are very stable. Toxicity is considered to be due to the intact molecule, and is generally greater for these compounds than those in the first subclass (Bryson, 1989). Methyl, ethyl, butyl and propyl mercury belong to this subclass.
    B) SOURCES
    1) CONTAMINATED FISH
    a) The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has advised pregnant women, women who plan to become pregnant, nursing mothers, and young children to avoid eating large fish known to contain high mercury concentrations (eg; shark, swordfish, king mackerel, tilefish) with reported mean mercury concentrations of 0.73 to 1.45 ppm (Ruha et al, 2009; Knobeloch et al, 2006). In one case series, mercury concentrations were reported in the following fish: Lake superior trout (less than 0.02 mcg/g); Lake superior whitefish (less than 0.02 mcg/g); farm-raised salmon (0.05 mcg/g); farm-raised trout (0.05 mcg/g); imported seabass (up to 0.7 mcg/g); panfish (up to 0.58 mcg/g); walleye (up to 3.1 mcg/g); bass (up to 1.7 mcg/g); Northern pike (up to 1.9 mcg/g); perch (0.049 mcg/g); canned tuna (up to 0.85 mcg/g); bluegill (up to 0.53 mcg/g); brook trout (0.016 mcg/g) (Knobeloch et al, 2006).
    b) MINAMATA DISEASE: From 1932 until 1968, a factory in Minamata, Japan, discharged mercury and methylmercury contaminated waste directly into Minamata bay and the Yatsushiro Sea. Although in 1959, Minamata disease was determined to be methylmercury poisoning from consuming contaminated fish and shellfish, the factory continued to discharge mercury contaminated waste until 1968(Takaoka et al, 2008).
    2) VACCINE PRESERVATIVES - THIOMERSAL
    a) Thiomersal has been used in vaccines as a preservative (Pichichero et al, 2002).
    b) HEPATITIS VACCINE: Elevated mercury concentrations after a single dose of hepatitis B vaccine containing thiomersal were observed in preterm and term infants. Overall, a significantly higher mean mercury concentration was observed for the preterm group compared with the term group (mean +/- SD, 7.36 +/- 4.99 mcg/L vs 2.24 +/- 0.58 mcg/L; p less than 0.01) (Stajich et al, 2000).
    C) USES
    1) Methylmercury is not used in any industrials products. Organic mercury was once used as a fungicide, but their use was banned in the 1970s. In 1991, all forms of exterior paint containing mercury were discontinued. The most common source of organic mercury is dietary fish consumption. Organic mercury is present in trace amounts in the vaccine preservative, thimerosal (U.S. Geological Survey, 2010; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
    2) In the past, organic mercury compounds were also used as antiseptics/antibacterials, herbicides, mildewcides, slimicides, seed disinfectants, and as preservatives in pharmaceuticals (Gosselin et al, 1984; Sax & Lewis, 1987; Budavari, 1996). Organic mercury compounds have also been used in veterinary practice as topical antifungal and antibacterial agents (Budavari, 1996).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Methylmercury is not used in any industrials products. Organic mercury was once used as a fungicide, but their use was banned in the 1970s. After 1991, all forms of exterior paint containing mercury were discontinued. The most common source of organic mercury is dietary fish consumption. Organic mercury is present in trace amounts in the vaccine preservative, thimerosal.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Organic mercury ointments, topical preparations, and preservatives have antimicrobial properties.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Neurotoxicity is the predominant clinical effect. Organic mercury combines with sulfhydryl groups thus interfering with cellular metabolism, function, and inactivating enzymes. Cerebellar and cerebral atrophy is observed in patients with significant organic mercury toxicity.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Low-level dietary exposure to organic mercury is common. Toxicity, however, is rare and generally due to exposure to chemical reagents.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Trace amounts of organic mercury found in vaccine preservatives (thimerosal) have not been associated with cognitive delay or other neurologic toxicity.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) OVERDOSE: Organic mercury may be absorbed by any route. Once toxicity develops from organic mercury, the effects are largely permanent, and generally outcome is poor after significant overdose. Partial improvement has been observed in some mildly symptomatic children though severely poisoned individuals have not been recovered.
    2) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Delayed neurotoxicity is the hallmark of organic mercury exposure. Acute ingestions may be associated with nausea and vomiting. Symptoms may include fatigue, headaches, cognitive delays, tremor, and paraesthesias. Chronic exposure may lead to withdrawn behavior with irritability (erethism).
    3) SEVERE TOXICITY: Neurotoxicity is the manifestation of severe organic mercury poisoning.
    4) NEUROLOGIC: Effects of poisoning may be latent for days to months depending upon the compound and the dose of the exposure. Dimethylmercury is the most toxic of the organic mercurials and even minute dermal exposures may lead to rapidly progressive cerebellar deficits, coma, and subsequent death. Methylmercury is more common; it is the form found in fish. Trace amounts of methylmercury found in fish, even in large consumption, have not been associated with cognitive delay or other neurologic toxicity. Ingestion of organic mercurials may lead to paresthesias, headaches, tremor, ataxia, dysarthria. visual field constriction, blindness, dementia, paralysis, coma, and death. Congenital toxicity is characterized by low birth weight, decreased muscle tone, developmental delay, seizure disorders, deafness, blindness, spasticity.
    5) CARDIOVASCULAR: Organic mercurials rarely cause cardiovascular toxicity. Hypotension and cardiac dysrhythmias are possible.
    6) RESPIRATORY: Respiratory symptoms are rare. Inhalation may lead to respiratory distress and respiratory collapse has been reported due to sensorimotor neuropathy.
    7) RENAL: Renal tubular dysfunction may occur but the majority of organic mercury is not cleared through the kidney making renal toxicity less common when compared to inorganic mercurials. Renal effects have been more commonly observed with aryl (eg, phenylmercuric salts) and alkoxyalkyl (eg, methoxyethyl mercury) compounds.
    8) GASTROINTESTINAL: Acute ingestion of large amounts of organic mercury may lead to nausea and vomiting. Gastrointestinal disturbances are more common with phenyl mercuric salts, methoxyethyl salts and other aryl and alkoxyalkyl compounds.
    9) DERMATOLOGY: Dermatitis may occur though is more common with inorganic mercury exposures. Contact dermatitis from topical organic mercury antiseptics is the most common dermatologic manifestation.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Some organic mercury salts may produce effects similar to inorganic mercury salts. Shock and vascular collapse have been reported with inorganic mercury salts. Cardiac arrhythmias and death have occurred in a few patients with serious preexisting diseases, following intravenous injection of some mercurial diuretics.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Respiratory failure has developed secondary to sensorimotor neuropathy.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Erethism, sensorimotor disturbances, and hearing and vision defects as a result of neurotoxicity may occur, principally as a result of alkyl (e.g. ethyl or methyl mercury) mercury intoxication. Chronic exposure to alkyl mercury is more frequently associated with these effects.
    1) Profound adverse effects on the developing child or nursing infant can occur if there is maternal exposure to organic mercury. Pediatric exposure may result in impaired intellectual and motor development, in addition to the effects typically observed in adults.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Organic mercury is well absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal disturbances are more common with phenyl mercuric salts, methoxyethyl salts and other aryl and alkoxyalkyl compounds. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea may occur.
    1) Methyl mercury and other alkylmercurials chiefly affect the neurological system, and are less likely to produce gastrointestinal effects.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Proteinuria, hematuria, anuria or polyuria, renal tubular necrosis and renal failure may occur.
    0.2.11) ACID-BASE
    A) Acid-base imbalance has been reported.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) Fluid and electrolyte imbalances may occur, particularly if nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea are severe or prolonged.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Organic mercury can be absorbed through the skin to produce systemic effects. Irritation or burns can result from exposure to some compounds. Sensitization has been reported.
    0.2.19) IMMUNOLOGIC
    A) Sensitization can occur. In vitro models have shown that organic mercury may interfere with the bacteriocidal capacity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Prenatal exposure to organic mercury is associated with severe effects including profound mental retardation, spasticity, seizures, and cerebral palsy.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) A basic metabolic panel including renal function tests should be followed since toxicity may be delayed.
    B) Whole blood mercury levels are the preferred diagnostic test. Blood should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the appropriate reference laboratory. The whole blood mercury should be speciated to inorganic and organic fractions. Patients should abstain from fish meals for 1 week prior to testing. Levels of 10 to 15 mcg/L are common in patients eating several fish meals per week. Levels over 200 mcg/L have been associated with symptoms.
    C) Hair testing is useful in documenting a remote exposure only, but it has no role in quantification of the exposure.
    D) Obtain 24-hour urine collection for long-chain aryl or alkyl mercury compounds (eg, phenylmercury). Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is cleared through biliary and gastrointestinal tract.
    E) Chest x-ray should be obtained for inhalational exposures. Serial visual field testing and neuropsychiatric testing is useful for chronic toxicity monitoring.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. If significant exposure has occurred, chelation therapy should be started as soon as possible, prior to development of symptoms. Breastfeeding should be halted immediately.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Supportive care is the mainstay of care. If significant exposure has occurred, chelation therapy should be started as soon as possible, prior to development of symptoms.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Dermal exposures should be washed off with soap and water. No other prehospital decontamination is indicated. Organic mercury spills should be contained and cleaned by qualified hazardous material abatement crews.
    2) HOSPITAL: Most presentations are subacute or chronic exposures making gastrointestinal decontamination ineffective. However, given the dismal outcomes and limited therapeutic options, aggressive gastrointestinal decontamination including gastric lavage, activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation is recommended for acute ingestions. Breastfeeding mothers should continue to pump breast milk and discard.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway management may be necessary if a patient progresses to coma, if there is respiratory depression due to sensorimotor neuropathy, or if significant pneumonitis is present.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) CHELATION
    1) Unithiol (2,3-dimercaptopropanol-sulfonic acid, DMPS) is available in Europe and through compounding pharmacies in the United States. It is a water-soluble analog of BAL, and can be given orally or parenterally. For patients with severe poisoning or large exposures, the parenteral unithiol should be the initial chelator if it is available, it is considered a better mercury chelator than succimer. Unithiol is dosed as follows: IV: Day one 250 mg/kg every 3 to 4 hours, day two 250 mg every 4 to 6 hours, day three 250 mg every 6 to 8 hours, day four 250 mg every 8 to 12 hours, days five and six: 250 mg every 8 to 24 hours. Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route after the fifth day: 100 to 300 mg three times daily. ORAL: Initially 1200 mg to 2400 mg every 24 hours divided (100 mg or 200 mg every 2 hours), reduce to 100 mg to 300 mg every 8 hours as tolerated. There is limited data suggesting that oral succimer (10 mg/kg every 8 hours for 5 days then twice daily for 2 weeks) can reduce mercury levels in the tissues. D-penicillamine (500 mg twice daily for 12 weeks) should be considered the second-line agent. Patients should be treated for 14 days or until there is no mercury detected in the urine. Dimercaprol (BAL; British Anti Lewisite) is CONTRAINDICATED because it increases brain organic mercury concentrations.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, and exchange perfusion do not remove significant amounts of mercury after subacute or chronic organic mercury exposure. Hemodialysis in combination with L-cysteine infusion into the arterial blood has been shown to increase mercury clearance in chronic methylmercury intoxication, (L-cysteine converts methylmercury into a diffusible form) but it has not known if this improves outcomes.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Patients with chronic exposures can be referred to outpatient healthcare providers for evaluation. Unintentional pediatric ingestions of mercurochrome can generally be managed in the home without gastrointestinal decontamination.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chronic exposures already in healthcare facilities may be observed and referred to neurology or toxicology outpatient providers. All patients with acute exposures should be referred to a healthcare facility.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: All patients with an exposure to dimethylmercury should be admitted. All acute ingestions should be admitted. Patients with moderate or severe neurologic toxicity felt to be secondary to organic mercury warrant inpatient evaluation for neurology and toxicology consultation, whole blood quantification, and evaluation for possible chelation.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: All cases with organic mercury toxicity should involve a toxicology and neurology consultants.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) Failure to fully appreciate the toxicity of significant organic mercury exposures during the latent phase may lead to delayed recognition of toxicity. Measurement of urine mercury when concerned for methylmercury toxicity is inappropriate since it is primarily cleared through the biliary tract resulting in a proportionally low urine mercury level. This may give false re-assurance when a low concentration is obtained.
    J) PHARMACOKINETICS/TOXICOKINETICS
    1) The organic mercurials are absorbed more completely (more than 90%) from the gastrointestinal tract than any other form of mercury because they are more lipid soluble. This lipid solubility allows passage across the blood-brain-barrier and the placenta. It is also concentrated in red-blood-cells. Organic mercurials are eliminated primarily through the biliary tract, then fecally with a significant amount of enterohepatic recirculation. Less than 10% is cleared renally. Blood half-life is approximately 70 days.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Chronic arsenic poisoning may yield muscle weakness; however, the associate dermatologic effects are more prominent than in organic mercury poisoning. Chronic bismuth toxicity may result in a similar progressive neurotoxicity though, dermal changes are more common and black stools would be expected with chronic ingestion of bismuth. Medical etiologies such as progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy and cerebrovascular accidents should be considered.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Respiratory support should be instituted based upon patient symptomatology.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    B) Observe for development of clinical signs and symptoms.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) Dermal exposure to dimethylmercury should be treated with immediate hospitalization and chelation therapy.
    2) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    3) Take precautions to avoid exposure of health care professionals and other individuals.
    4) SYSTEMIC EFFECTS
    a) Some chemicals can produce systemic poisoning by absorption through intact skin. Carefully observe patients with dermal exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    b) Administration of chelators may be required. Provide supportive care.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The US EPA has set a daily lifetime dose (oral reference dose) of 0.1 mcg/kg/day for methylmercury. It is believed that this dose is not associated with any potential hazards. The estimated minimum lethal dose of methyl mercury for a 70-kg person ranges from 20 to 60 mg/kg. Unintentional pediatric ingestions of mercurochrome are NOT associated with significant toxicity. Topical preparations such as merbromin (mercurochrome) have limited dermal absorption; however, exposure to excoriated surfaces or mucous membranes may yield toxicity. Dimethylmercury is the most toxic of the organic mercurials and even minute dermal exposures may lead to rapidly progressive cerebellar deficits, coma, and subsequent death.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Methylmercury is not used in any industrials products. Organic mercury was once used as a fungicide, but their use was banned in the 1970s. After 1991, all forms of exterior paint containing mercury were discontinued. The most common source of organic mercury is dietary fish consumption. Organic mercury is present in trace amounts in the vaccine preservative, thimerosal.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Organic mercury ointments, topical preparations, and preservatives have antimicrobial properties.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Neurotoxicity is the predominant clinical effect. Organic mercury combines with sulfhydryl groups thus interfering with cellular metabolism, function, and inactivating enzymes. Cerebellar and cerebral atrophy is observed in patients with significant organic mercury toxicity.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Low-level dietary exposure to organic mercury is common. Toxicity, however, is rare and generally due to exposure to chemical reagents.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Trace amounts of organic mercury found in vaccine preservatives (thimerosal) have not been associated with cognitive delay or other neurologic toxicity.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) OVERDOSE: Organic mercury may be absorbed by any route. Once toxicity develops from organic mercury, the effects are largely permanent, and generally outcome is poor after significant overdose. Partial improvement has been observed in some mildly symptomatic children though severely poisoned individuals have not been recovered.
    2) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Delayed neurotoxicity is the hallmark of organic mercury exposure. Acute ingestions may be associated with nausea and vomiting. Symptoms may include fatigue, headaches, cognitive delays, tremor, and paraesthesias. Chronic exposure may lead to withdrawn behavior with irritability (erethism).
    3) SEVERE TOXICITY: Neurotoxicity is the manifestation of severe organic mercury poisoning.
    4) NEUROLOGIC: Effects of poisoning may be latent for days to months depending upon the compound and the dose of the exposure. Dimethylmercury is the most toxic of the organic mercurials and even minute dermal exposures may lead to rapidly progressive cerebellar deficits, coma, and subsequent death. Methylmercury is more common; it is the form found in fish. Trace amounts of methylmercury found in fish, even in large consumption, have not been associated with cognitive delay or other neurologic toxicity. Ingestion of organic mercurials may lead to paresthesias, headaches, tremor, ataxia, dysarthria. visual field constriction, blindness, dementia, paralysis, coma, and death. Congenital toxicity is characterized by low birth weight, decreased muscle tone, developmental delay, seizure disorders, deafness, blindness, spasticity.
    5) CARDIOVASCULAR: Organic mercurials rarely cause cardiovascular toxicity. Hypotension and cardiac dysrhythmias are possible.
    6) RESPIRATORY: Respiratory symptoms are rare. Inhalation may lead to respiratory distress and respiratory collapse has been reported due to sensorimotor neuropathy.
    7) RENAL: Renal tubular dysfunction may occur but the majority of organic mercury is not cleared through the kidney making renal toxicity less common when compared to inorganic mercurials. Renal effects have been more commonly observed with aryl (eg, phenylmercuric salts) and alkoxyalkyl (eg, methoxyethyl mercury) compounds.
    8) GASTROINTESTINAL: Acute ingestion of large amounts of organic mercury may lead to nausea and vomiting. Gastrointestinal disturbances are more common with phenyl mercuric salts, methoxyethyl salts and other aryl and alkoxyalkyl compounds.
    9) DERMATOLOGY: Dermatitis may occur though is more common with inorganic mercury exposures. Contact dermatitis from topical organic mercury antiseptics is the most common dermatologic manifestation.

Vital Signs

    3.3.2) RESPIRATIONS
    A) RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
    1) Respiratory distress associated with laryngeal obstruction occurred in an adult 30 hours after self-medication of a sore throat with a thiomersal-containing throat spray (Maibach, 1975). Delayed hypersensitization to thiomersal was the suspected cause; patch testing to thiomersal was strongly positive.
    2) Intense dyspnea and other effects suggestive of anaphylactic hypersensitivity occurred in a man 3 minutes after topical application of a mercurochrome- containing antiseptic to abraded skin. Patch tests were positive (Torres & De Corres, 1985).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IRRITATION
    1) Irritation of the eyes and skin around the eyes may result from contact with highly concentrated solutions of some phenylmercuric salts (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    a) Phenylmercuric salts have been used as antimicrobials in eyedrops. Concentrations which have been used in eyedrops are very low and are not expected to cause discomfort or adverse effects with short use (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    b) EXAMPLES OF PHENYLMERCURIC SALTS: phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercuric chloride, phenylmercuric nitrate, phenylmercuric oleate, phenylmercuric hydroxide.
    2) THIMEROSAL in eye drops and contact lens solutions may produce eye irritation in hypersensitive individuals (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    B) MERCURIALENTIS
    1) MERCURIALENTIS: As reviewed by Grant (1986), long term use of eyedrops which contain phenylmercuric acetate (0.001%) or phenylmercuric nitrate as preservatives have produced lens discoloration.
    a) THIMEROSAL has replaced phenylmercuric salts in many eyedrops, and has reduced the incidence of mercurialentis (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    2) ALTERED LENS TRANSPARENCY has resulted from long term use of eyedrops containing 0.002% phenylmercuric acetate (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    C) BAND KERATOPATHY, CORNEAL CALCIFICATION/OPACIFICATION
    1) Atypical band keratopathy or corneal calcification have been reported from the long term use (average of 10 years) of pilocarpine eyedrops which contained phenylmercuric nitrate (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    a) THIMEROSAL has replaced phenylmercuric salts in many eyedrops, and has reduced the incidence of band keratopathy (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    2) Corneal injury has resulted from the use of eyedrops which contained high concentrations of phenylmercuric salts.
    3) Corneal opacification and vascularization has occurred with the exposure of rats and guinea pigs to eyedrops containing 0.1% HYDRARGAPHEN (PHENYLMERCURIC DINAPHTHYL-METHANEDISULFONATE). An ophthalmic preparation containing 0.033% hydrargaphen has been used in humans without apparent serious adverse effects (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    D) PTOSIS, ABNORMAL OCULAR MOVEMENTS
    1) Minor ptosis, irregular nystagmus, jerky visual tracking, and other disturbed eye movements occasionally have been observed (Gosselin et al, 1984; Grant & Schuman, 1993; Davis et al, 1994). Electro-oculography has been useful in detecting abnormal movements (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    E) CONSTRICTION OF VISUAL FIELDS
    1) Occupational inhalational exposure to organic mercury fungicides, ingestion of foods contaminated with methyl mercury, and dermal exposure to dimethylmercury has produced concentric constriction of the visual fields as a result of mercury neurotoxicity (Bakir et al, 1980; Grant & Schuman, 1993; Davis et al, 1994; Nierenberg et al, 1998; Siegler et al, 1999).
    2) The constriction may progress considerably over a 2 week period, despite cessation of exposure. Spontaneous recovery of visual field deficits rarely occurs (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    F) BLINDNESS
    1) Blindness has resulted from ingestion of ethyl or methyl mercury contaminated food, and chronic occupational inhalation exposure to organic mercury compounds (Bakir et al, 1980; Davis et al, 1994; Amin-Zaki et al, 1978; Grant & Schuman, 1993). Spontaneous recovery of central vision may occur in some cases. Deficits in peripheral vision (visual field constriction) are less likely to resolve.
    2) Maternal exposure during pregnancy to foods contaminated with methylmercury has resulted in blindness in the neonate (Bakir et al, 1980).
    3) HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS
    a) Disappearance of neurons and proliferation of glial cells has been observed in the occipital visual cortex and cerebellum (Grant & Schuman, 1993; Davis et al, 1994).
    G) RETINAL EDEMA, CHORIORETINAL ATROPHY
    1) Retinal edema, chorioretinal atrophy (p-chloromercuribenzoate, in vitro) and slight retinal toxicity from systemic absorption (p-chloromercuribenzoate, rabbit) have been reported (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    H) IMPAIRED AQUEOUS OUTFLOW
    1) P-CHLOROMERCURIBENZOATE AND P-CHLOROMERCURIBENZENE SULFONATE have impaired aqueous outflow in an in vitro study (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) DEAFNESS
    1) Outbreaks of methylmercury poisoning due to consumption of foods contaminated with methyl and/or ethyl mercury has resulted in hearing loss and deafness as a result of neurotoxic effects of mercury (Nagi & Yassin, 1974; Bakir et al, 1980). Prenatal exposure also resulted in impaired hearing (Bakir et al, 1980). Dermal exposure to dimethylmercury resulted in mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (Nierenberg et al, 1998).
    B) TINNITUS
    1) A 53-year-old woman developed stomatitis, tremors, and tinnitus. Mercury levels from blood and urine samples were 125 mcg/L and 24 mcg/L, respectively. The patient was consuming up to two fish meals (particularly swordfish) daily 6 or 7 days per week over a period of several years. It is believed that the patient's excessive consumption of fish was the source of mercury exposure. She was advised to substantially reduce her consumption of fish; however, she was lost to follow-up(Risher, 2004).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Some organic mercury salts may produce effects similar to inorganic mercury salts. Shock and vascular collapse have been reported with inorganic mercury salts. Cardiac arrhythmias and death have occurred in a few patients with serious preexisting diseases, following intravenous injection of some mercurial diuretics.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Phenylmercuric salts and other aryl and alkoxyalkyl mercury compounds are converted in vivo to inorganic mercury. Effects similar to inorganic mercury compounds may occur (US DHHS, 1992; Gosselin et al, 1984; Bryson, 1989). Inorganic mercury salts have produced shock and vascular collapse. Organic mercury compounds are generally less corrosive than the inorganic salts (Klaassen, 1990).
    B) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) A few incidences of bradycardia or death due to cardiac dysrhythmias following the intravenous injection of organic mercurials (salyrgan, mercupurin) have been reported (Barker et al, 1942; Brown et al, 1942).
    2) Tachycardia, fibrillation, cyanosis, cardiac standstill and death were reported within 3 to 30 minutes of infusion. Bradycardia, cyanosis and seizure activity occurred in one nonfatal case (Brown et al, 1942).
    3) Serious preexisting cardiac, renal or other diseases were present in all cases. Cardiac monitoring did not appear to have been conducted during some of these incidences.
    4) One study concluded that deaths following injection of mercurial diuretics were more likely due to fluid and electrolyte imbalances, diuresis induced digitalis toxicity, or were idiosyncratic (DeGraff & Nadler, 1942).
    C) ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) RISK OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) The potential risk of myocardial infarction associated with dietary consumption of methylmercury (eg, fish ingestion) was examined in a case-controlled study conducted in 8 European countries and Israel. Mercury levels in toenail clippings and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels (a biologic marker for fatty-fish intake) were measured an association with first myocardial infarction among men. After adjustment for the DHA levels and coronary risk factors (note: the cases had significantly higher risk factors), the mercury levels in those experiencing an MI were 15% higher than those in the control group. The toenail mercury level was directly associated with the risk of a first myocardial infarction, and that adipose-tissue DHA levels were inversely associated with the risk of myocardial infarction. The authors concluded that high mercury content may promote atherosclerosis and diminish the cardioprotective effects of fish oil (Guallar et al, 2002).
    a) Several authors have questioned the conclusions drawn in this study (Plante & Babo, 2003; Buettner, 2003; Mutter & Naumann, 2003).
    D) AT RISK OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) LACK OF EFFECT: A study with a nested case-control design and a large prospective cohort did not find an association between total mercury exposure and the risk of coronary heart disease, but a weak relation could not be ruled out. Toe clippings of 33,737 male health professionals (age 40 to 75 years) with no previous history of cardiovascular disease or cancer were collected. During 5 years of follow-up, 470 cases of coronary heart disease (coronary-artery surgery, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and fatal coronary heart disease) were reported. Dentists had higher mean mercury concentration in their toenails than nondentists (mean, 0.91 and 0.45 mcg/g, respectively, p less than 0.001). In addition, patients who ate more fish had significantly higher mercury concentrations in their toenails (p less than 0.001). Overall, mercury concentration was not significantly associated with the risk of coronary heart disease after adjusting for age, and smoking, and other risk factors had been controlled (Yoshizawa et al, 2002).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Respiratory failure has developed secondary to sensorimotor neuropathy.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) APNEA
    1) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man required mechanical ventilation for 3 days because of a severe ascending sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Erethism, sensorimotor disturbances, and hearing and vision defects as a result of neurotoxicity may occur, principally as a result of alkyl (e.g. ethyl or methyl mercury) mercury intoxication. Chronic exposure to alkyl mercury is more frequently associated with these effects.
    1) Profound adverse effects on the developing child or nursing infant can occur if there is maternal exposure to organic mercury. Pediatric exposure may result in impaired intellectual and motor development, in addition to the effects typically observed in adults.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ALTERED MENTAL STATUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ERETHISM is a syndrome more often associated with chronic mercury exposure. Symptoms may include short term memory loss (Smith, 1983), personality changes, xenophobia, insomnia, impaired concentration, and irritability (Clarkson, 1990; Marsh et al, 1987).
    b) INTELLIGENCE: Decreased intelligence has been reported in adults and children exposed to methyl or ethyl mercury (Bakir et al, 1980; Davis et al, 1994; Marsh et al, 1987).
    B) CEREBELLAR DISORDER
    1) Cerebellar signs of ataxia, loss of coordination and speech and tremor have been reported after ingestion of food contaminated with methyl or ethyl mercury (Nagi & Yassin, 1974; Zhang, 1984; McKeown-Eyssen et al, 1983; Bakir et al, 1980; Davis et al, 1994) and following inhalation of vapors from phenylmercuric ammonium acetate (O'Carroll et al, 1995) and following toxic dermal exposures to dimethylmercury (Siegler et al, 1999).
    2) Chronic ingestion of merthiolate by an adult for an unknown duration resulted in agitation and other neurologic effects in a fatal case (Nascimento et al, 1990).
    3) Dysmetria, dystaxic handwriting, wide based gait, and scanning speech developed after dermal exposure to dimethylmercury (Nierenberg et al, 1998).
    4) CASE REPORT: In cases of methylmercury poisoning, gliosis of the cerebellar cortices predominates. The cerebellum is always affected, with damage consisting of loss of granule and Golgi cells. A few drops of dimethylmercury on the skin have resulted in profound effects on the cerebellum with massive Purkinje cell loss and eventual death (9 months after exposure) in one patient (Siegler et al, 1999).
    C) NEUROPATHY
    1) Paresthesias, fatigue, motor weakness, hyperreflexia, diminished muscle tone and spasticity may be observed with moderately severe ingestions (Zhang, 1984; McKeown-Eyssen et al, 1983; Nagi & Yassin, 1974; Cinca et al, 1979; Bakir et al, 1980).
    2) Hemiparesis, quadriplegia, and proprioception loss has also been documented in children exposed to methyl mercury contaminated pork (Davis et al, 1994). Increased muscle tone has also been reported in infants who were exposed prenatally to methyl mercury (Bakir et al, 1980).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man developed an autonomic and ascending peripheral axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 6 days after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996). He required mechanical ventilation for 3 days.
    4) CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old fisherman from Minamata City, Japan presented with numbness of the feet and speech disturbance. Ten years after the initial presentation, neurological examination revealed slight constriction of visual fields on the temporal side, muscular rigidity, increased tendon reflexes. tremor of the fingers, dysgraphia, adiadochokinesis, labyrinthine deafness, hypesthesia, hypalgesia, dysesthesia in the hands and below the knees, a mask-like face, and dyskinesia. Minamata disease (methylmercury poisoning) was suspected, and a sural nerve biopsy revealed endoneurial fibrosis and regenerated myelin sheaths. A month later he died of massive hemorrhage from gastroduodenal ulcer. At autopsy, the dorsal roots and sural nerve revealed endoneurial fibrosis, loss of nerve fibers, and presence of Bungner's hands. Wallerian degeneration of the fasciculus gracilis (Goll's tract) in the spinal cord with relative preservation of neurons in sensory ganglia was observed (Eto et al, 2002).
    D) ENCEPHALITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old female inadvertently received an intrathecal injection of mercury-containing Mercurochrome disinfectant (approximately 5 mL) via a cerebrospinal fluid fistula. Within 24-hours the patient developed impaired consciousness, and severe encephalopathy and meningitis. Laboratory parameters for mercury were extremely elevated (ie, CSF 2100 mcg/L; blood 290 mcg/L; and urine 5000 mcg/L) on admission. A lumbar drainage was inserted along with parenteral chelation therapy (which initially included DMPS followed by DMSA), and the patient gradually improved with a residual sensory-motor polyneuropathy with ataxia 18 months after exposure. Neuropsychological testing also revealed impaired memory, but otherwise good cognitive function (Stark et al, 2004).
    E) PSYCHOTIC DISORDER
    1) Anxiety, agitation, irrational fears, impulsiveness and headache occurred in a man exposed to phenylmercuric ammonium acetate vapors (O'Carroll et al, 1995).
    F) MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
    1) Multiple sclerosis has been hypothetically associated with chronic organic mercury exposure. Research to date reportedly has not adequately supported this hypothesis (Clausen, 1993).
    2) Other forms of mercury have been associated with a neurological syndrome resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Lou Gehrig Disease (Adams et al, 1983). The peripheral effects involve a dying-back axonopathy, followed by demyelination. General loss of brain function may also occur (FOLKL & KONIG, 1983).
    G) EXTRAPYRAMIDAL DISEASE
    1) Muscle rigidity, jerky myoclonic movements and choreoathetotic movements have been observed in individuals exposed to methyl mercury contaminated food (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; Bakir et al, 1980; Davis et al, 1994) and in an adult who ingested merthiolate on a long-term basis (Nascimento et al, 1990).
    H) HYPERREFLEXIA
    1) Hyperactive deep tendon reflexes have been observed in children exposed to methyl mercury (Davis, 1994).
    I) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures and coma are seen with severe toxicity (Nagi & Yassin, 1974; Cinca et al, 1979; Bakir et al, 1980; Davis et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man developed delirium progressing to coma 11 days after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996).
    J) ABNORMAL VISION
    1) VISUAL/AUDITORY EFFECTS: Constriction of the visual fields, blindness, optic atrophy, mydriasis, and hearing impairment or deafness have been reported with more severe intoxication (Zhang, 1984; McKeown-Eyssen et al, 1983; Nagi & Yassin, 1974; Cinca et al, 1979; Bakir et al, 1980; Clarkson, 1990; Marsh et al, 1987; Davis et al, 1994; Nierenberg et al, 1998; Siegler et al, 1999).
    2) Specific damage occurs in the cerebellum and the visual cortex following toxic exposures (Langford & Ferner, 1999). Visual field defects are common and are persistent following organic mercury exposures (Korogi et al, 1998). VISUAL CORTEX ATROPHY has been detected upon autopsy of an individual chronically exposed by inhalation to a methyl mercury in a fungicide (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    K) DISTURBANCE IN SPEECH
    1) Severe dysarthria (inability to articulate) has been reported in 19 out of 26 pediatric cases who had developed mercury intoxication after consuming bread prepared from wheat which had been dusted with a methyl mercury fungicide (Nagi & Yassin, 1974). Dysarthria was also reported in an adult who chronically ingested merthiolate (Nascimento et al, 1990).
    L) HEARING LOSS
    1) More severe poisonings have resulted in hearing impairment or deafness. Dimethylmercury poisoning has been reported to result in compromise of the auditory neural system, with minimal effect on the sensory (cochlear) mechanism in one fatal case of a dermal exposure. The patient was shown to have relatively good hearing sensitivity for pure tones bilaterally. An abnormal bilateral auditory brain stem response was apparent (Musiek & Hanlon, 1999).
    M) DECREASED BODY GROWTH
    1) Delayed motor and speech development has occurred in infants born to mothers who were exposed to methylmercury during pregnancy (Marsh et al, 1987).
    N) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) Other effects which have been observed following extreme chronic pediatric exposure, or as a result of prenatal exposure include somnolence or agitation, lethargy and weak cry (Davis et al, 1994).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Organic mercury is well absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal disturbances are more common with phenyl mercuric salts, methoxyethyl salts and other aryl and alkoxyalkyl compounds. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea may occur.
    1) Methyl mercury and other alkylmercurials chiefly affect the neurological system, and are less likely to produce gastrointestinal effects.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INTESTINAL ABSORPTION
    1) METHYLMERCURY compounds are almost 100% absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract (Manahan, 1991). Aryl and long chain alkyl compounds are also well absorbed, but to a lesser extent than methyl mercury.
    B) GASTRITIS
    1) Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea may occur (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; US DHHS, 1992; Pfab et al, 1996). Higher doses may result in an exposure-related colitis (Langford & Ferner, 1999). Symptoms (nausea, diarrhea) may be delayed (a few weeks) and may be persistent for several months following an acute toxic exposure (Siegler et al, 1999).
    2) Nausea and diarrhea for 3 months occurred in an adult who chronically ingested merthiolate (Nascimento et al, 1990).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) Acute or chronic poisoning with organic mercury may result in hepatic enzyme disturbances (Langford & Ferner, 1999).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Proteinuria, hematuria, anuria or polyuria, renal tubular necrosis and renal failure may occur.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ALBUMINURIA
    1) Proteinuria and increased urinary mercury levels have been measured in workers exposed to organomercurial seed dressings. The urinary mercury levels did not correlate well with proteinuria (Taylor et al, 1969).
    2) Albuminuria has been reported as a result of ethyl mercury poisoning, skin exposure to phenyl mercury acetate, and inhalation of methoxyethyl mercury silicate (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    B) KIDNEY DISEASE
    1) Nephrotic syndrome developed in a patient who inhaled a methoxyethyl mercury compound (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    C) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) Renal insufficiency has occurred in infants as a result of omphalocele treatment with mercurochrome (Debray et al, 1979).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man developed polyuric acute renal failure with glycosuria, proteinuria, beta-2-microglobulinuria and a peak serum creatinine of 2.4 mg/dL after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996).
    D) CRUSH SYNDROME
    1) Renal tubular necrosis may occur. Renal effects have been more commonly observed with aryl (e.g. phenylmercuric salts) and alkoxyalkyl (e.g. methoxyethyl mercury) compounds (Gosselin et al, 1984; Bryson, 1989).

Acid-Base

    3.11.1) SUMMARY
    A) Acid-base imbalance has been reported.
    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) Metabolic acidosis has occurred in an infant following omphalocele treatment with mercurochrome which resulted in renal insufficiency (Debray et al, 1979).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Organic mercury can be absorbed through the skin to produce systemic effects. Irritation or burns can result from exposure to some compounds. Sensitization has been reported.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN FINDING
    1) Organic mercury compounds can be absorbed through the skin (Manahan, 1991; Yeh et al, 1978; Nierenberg et al, 1998). Elevated mercury levels and toxicity have occurred in infants with omphaloceles which were treated with organic mercurial antiseptics (Fagan et al, 1977; Nascimento et al, 1990).
    B) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) Phenylmercuric salts (acetate, nitrate) in concentrations of 0.1% and higher are primary irritants. Initially, erythema and burning appear, followed by vesicles within 48 hours (Morris, 1960; Koby, 1972).
    2) CASE REPORT: A man who had been sprayed with a mixture of equal parts of phenylmercuric acetate (12% by weight), glacial acetic acid and benzene (benzol) developed second degree burns (Goldwater et al, 1964).
    3) Methoxyethyl mercury silicate produces local skin irritation. Concentrated methoxyethyl mercury acetate solutions have produced blisters on the skin of animals (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    C) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) Skin contact with methyl mercury, ethyl mercury, phenyl mercury compounds, and tolyl mercury compounds have produced dermatitis and eczema (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    2) ALLERGY: A positive reaction to 0.01% phenylmercuric acetate, and a contact urticaria syndrome consisting of urticaria, facial edema, and bronchospasm have been reported (Torresani et al, 1993). Positive skin reactions to sodium ethyl mercury salicylate (Merthiolate(R), Thimerosal) have occurred (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; Wilson et al, 1981; Aberer et al, 1990).
    D) ACRODYNIA DUE TO MERCURY
    1) ACRODYNIA, a particular form of hypersensitization to mercurials has been seen in children of 4 months to 4 years. This reaction involves generalized body rash, chills, profuse perspiration, desquamation of the palms and soles, photophobia, irritability, sleeplessness, leg cramps, and swelling of the cheeks, nose, hands, and feet (HSDB, 1990; (Gosselin et al, 1984).
    2) CASE REPORT: Acrodynia developed in a 10-year-old boy 10 days after the inside of his home was painted with interior latex paint which contained phenylmercuric acetate at levels 3 times those recommended by the EPA (Agocs et al, 1990; CDC, 1990).
    a) All family members had increased urinary mercury excretion but only the boy became symptomatic. Elemental mercury vapor released from the phenylmercuric acetate-containing paint was the probable cause of mercury intoxication.
    E) PEMPHIGUS FOLIACEUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) PEMPHIGUS FOLIACEUS: Pemphigus foliaceus or "fogo selvagem", an autoimmune blistering skin disorder, is endemic in several Central and South American countries. Outbreaks of this disease have occurred on the banks of rivers where there is methyl mercury contamination from alluvium gold mining and deforestation. It is suggested that chronic exposure to methyl mercury may cause pemphigus foliaceus and patients with human leukocyte antigen HLA-DRB 1 haplotypes have an increased risk of developing this disease (Robledo, 2012).

Immunologic

    3.19.1) SUMMARY
    A) Sensitization can occur. In vitro models have shown that organic mercury may interfere with the bacteriocidal capacity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANAPHYLACTOID REACTION
    1) Sensitization can occur (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; Wilson et al, 1981; Aberer et al, 1990). Anaphylaxis is rare (Torres & De Corres, 1985).
    2) Acute laryngeal obstruction requiring emergency tracheostomy occurred in an adult 30 hours after the use of a thiomersal-containing throat spray to treat a minor sore throat. Patch testing to thiomersal was positive (Maibach, 1975).
    3) Intense dyspnea, giddiness, upper body flushing and exanthema developed in a man 3 minutes after topical application of a mercurochrome-containing antiseptic to abraded skin. Patch tests to inorganic and organic mercury compounds were positive (Torres & De Corres, 1985).
    3.19.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) WBC ABNORMAL
    a) PMN LEUCOCYTES: In vitro models have demonstrated that inorganic and organic mercury may hamper the bacteriotoxic capacity of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (Obel et al, 1993).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Prenatal exposure to organic mercury is associated with severe effects including profound mental retardation, spasticity, seizures, and cerebral palsy.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) BRAIN DAMAGE CONGENITAL
    1) Abnormalities reported on CT in patients with fetal methylmercury poisoning include sulcal and mild ventricular enlargement, underdevelopment of cerebellar matter and lobe size, and simplified gyral patterns. Findings suggest that developmental defects result from cortical and subcortical lesions (Hamada et al, 1993).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) CNS EFFECTS
    1) In one study, prenatal exposure from contaminated seafood was associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental deficit (Steuerwald et al, 2000).
    2) Children exposed in utero to organic mercury in the Minamata epidemic developed cerebral palsy, chorea, ataxia, tremors, seizures, and profound mental retardation (Winship, 1985). The organ most sensitive to gestational exposure is the central nervous system (Aschner, 2001; Myers & Davidson, 2000).
    3) Iraqi children exposed in utero to methylmercury from contaminated grain developed irritability, increased reflexes, visual and hearing impairment, motor and mental retardation (Bakir et al, 1980).
    B) DOSE RESPONSE
    1) CASE SERIES - A series of 81 infant-mother pairs were evaluated for identification of a dose-response relationship between methylmercury concentrations in single strands of maternal hair and observed effects in the child. The women had, during pregnancy, consumed bread made from methylmercury treated seed. Children of women with higher exposures to methylmercury during gestation were at greater risk for the development of neurologic findings and developmental delays. No mercury concentrations were measured in the children (Marsh et al, 1987).
    2) Neurobehavioral effects may occur in children of mothers exposed to methylmercury if maternal mercury concentration in hair is greater than 6 micrograms/gram (30 nanomoles/gram), which correlates to a blood concentration of approximately 24 micrograms/liter (120 nanomoles/Liter) (Grandjean et al, 1994).
    C) PRETERM DELIVERY
    1) One study evaluated the risk of very preterm birth in relation to mercury concentrations among women with low to moderate exposure. Maternal hair mercury concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 2.50 mcg/g (mean, 0.29 mcg/g; median, 0.23 mcg/g). The mean mercury concentrations increased as levels of fish consumption increased. The consumption of canned fish, bought fish, and sport-caught fish and total fish consumption were each positively associated with maternal hair mercury concentrations. Overall, women who delivered before 35 weeks' gestation were more likely to have hair mercury concentrations at or above the 90th percentile (equal to 0.55 mcg/g or greater) compared with women delivering at term, even after adjusting for maternal characteristics and fish consumption (adjusted odds ration equal to 3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 6.7) (Xue et al, 2007).
    D) DELAYED PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT
    1) In one study, mercury cord and maternal blood concentrations at delivery were correlated with psychomotor status of infants (1-year-old; n=233) whose mothers were exposed to varying amounts of mercury during pregnancy. Total mean mercury concentration in blood (GM) for infants with normal neurocognitive performance was lower than observed in the group with delayed performance (GM = 0.52 mcg/L vs 0.75 mcg/L; p = 0.010). In cord blood, GM was lower in the normal group than in the group with delayed performance (GM, 0.85 mcg/L vs 1.05 mcg/L; p = 0.07). It was concluded that children with mercury concentrations greater than 0.80 mcg/L in cord blood or greater than 0.50 mcg/L in maternal blood had a significantly greater probability of delayed psychomotor or mental performance (Jedrychowski et al, 2006).
    E) EFFECTS ON FETUS
    1) A study was conducted to determine the incidence of abnormal pregnancies during a period of low methylmercury contamination compared with heavy contamination in 2 areas in Japan. There was a significant increase in stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, hydatidiform mole and extrauterine pregnancy in both areas during the period of heavy contamination, compared with the low methylmercury contamination period (Itai et al, 2004).
    F) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Davidson et al (1998) reported NO adverse effects in the offspring of mothers in Seychelles with methylmercury hair levels 10 to 20 times higher than United States mothers due to consumption of more fish. Children were followed up to 66 months of age. The mean maternal total hair mercury level was 6.8 ppm; mean total hair mercury level was 6.5 ppm for children at 66 months of age (Davidson et al, 1998). A later report by the same authors concluded that no significant associations were observed between prenatal methylmercury exposure and any of the repeatedly measured endpoints (global cognition (a measure of developmental quotient or IQ); reading, mathematics scholastic achievement, social behavior, and memory) (Davidson et al, 2006).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Breast milk of mothers poisoned by methylmercury contaminated food contained mercury at a concentration of 5% of that found in blood (Bakir et al, 1973).
    2) Methylmercury is transferred to human breast milk and distributed in nursing infants in a dose-related fashion, as determined by analysis of mercury levels in infants' hair in a fishing community (Grandjean et al, 1994).
    3) No adverse effects on infant development during the first year of life were reported despite elevated hair-mercury levels in infants who ingested breast milk from mothers with elevated hair-mercury and who also were likely to have mercury exposure during gestation (Grandjean et al, 1995).
    a) Elevated infant hair-mercury levels correlated with early achievement of developmental milestones in the nursing infants. Breastfeeding was considered to overcome any detrimental effects of mercury exposure on early infant development (Grandjean et al, 1995).
    4) Neurobehavioral development was assessed in children who were exposed to methylmercury prenatally and during breastfeeding and compared with children exposed prenatally and not breastfed. At 7 years of age, breastfeeding was associated with a slightly better neuropsychological performance on most tests. Children who were breastfed for more than 4 months had significantly better scores on the WISC-R Block Designs and the Boston Naming Test (Jensen et al, 2005).
    5) In a study of 155 lactating Saudi mothers, the mean concentration of mercury in breast milk was 1.19 mcg/L (range, 0.012 to 6.44 mcg/L), with 57.4% (n=89) of mothers having mercury levels at or above 1 mcg/L, which is the background level for mercury in human milk. All mothers had total blood mercury concentrations below the US Environmental Protection Agency's maximum reference dose of 5.8 mcg/L. Mercury in breast milk was significantly correlated with mercury in maternal blood (p less than 0.001), suggesting efficient transfer of mercury from blood to milk. Measured as biomarkers of oxidative stress, urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with increasing levels of mercury in breast milk and urinary mercury levels in infants in a dose-related manner. Thus, the exposure to mercury in breastfed infants may induce oxidative stress and lead to pathogenesis of health problems, especially during neurodevelopment, in these infants (Al-Saleh et al, 2013).
    6) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) In mice exposed to methylmercury in breast milk, a high percent of inhibition (50%) of glutamate uptake by cerebellar slices was observed and seemed to be related to increased levels of hydroperoxide. The suckling mice also presented with lower body weights, had increased tremors, increased peripheral analgesia in toe pinch test, and decreased ability to grasp with hind legs (Manfroi et al, 2004).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Mercury and inorganic mercury compounds
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 3
    1) The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) PULMONARY CARCINOMA
    1) Borderline excess lung cancer incidence was seen in Norwegian chloralkali workers who had been exposed and monitored for mercury (Ellingsen et al, 1993).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Mercury at 5 ppm in the drinking water was not carcinogenic in mice (Schroeder & Mitchener, 1975).

Genotoxicity

    A) SUMMARY OF GENOTOXICITY -
    1) Studies reviewed by the IARC (1993) provide limited evidence of genotoxic effects in humans. Stronger evidence of genotoxic effects have been provided by in vitro studies.
    a) Mercury produces clastogenic effects in eukaryotic cells, and organic mercury compounds can inhibit the spindle mechanisms of chromosomes in a manner which favors the production of aneuploidy and/or polyploidy. Organic mercury may produce dominant lethal effects (IARC, 1993).
    2) HUMAN AND DIETARY EXPOSURES -
    a) Studies of humans chronically exposed to foods contaminated with methyl mercury have reported the presence or absence of increased sister chromatid exchange rates, chromosomal aberrations, and aneuploidy in the lymphocytes (IARC, 1993).
    b) POSITIVE - Micronuclei were elevated in peripheral lymphocytes of fishermen eating a high-mercury seafood diet (Franchi et al, 1994).
    3) HUMAN AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES -
    a) Studies of lymphocytes from workers exposed to organic mercury compounds have been largely inconclusive or negative with respect to the production of chromosomal aberrations, aneuploidy, micronuclei and sister chromatid exchange rates (IARC, 1993).
    b) Increased sister chromatid exchange rates were associated with exposure to phenylmercuric acetate (1 study) and increased chromosomal aberrations were associated with exposure to a mixture of methyl mercury chloride, ethyl mercury chloride, and mercuric chloride (1 study). Weakly positive increases in aneuploidy associated with exposure to phenyl mercury compounds was reported in 1 study (IARC, 1993).
    c) In most human studies, the specific organic mercury compounds were not identified, and the dose to which exposure occurred was not known.
    4) ANIMAL AND IN VITRO STUDIES
    a) One study evaluated the genotoxic effects of mercury nitrate, methylmercury chloride, and phenylmercury acetate in cultured human lymphocytes. Phenylmercury acetate (3 to 30 mcM) and methylmercury chloride (20 mcM) significantly increased the frequency of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and endoreduplication. In contrast, all concentrations of mercury nitrate did not cause a significant increase in SCE frequency, but at the concentrations of 30 mcM, it significantly increased the frequency of endoreduplicated mitosis. Overall, at equivalent toxic concentration, PMA was about 3- or 5-fold more effective in increasing SCEs and endoreduplication than methylmercury chloride and mercury nitrate, respectively (Lee et al, 1997).
    b) CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS or the absence of chromosomal aberrations have been reported in various animal studies. Chromosomal aberrations and SPINDLE DISTURBANCES have been induced by methyl mercury hydroxide, methoxyethyl mercury chloride, dimethyl mercury, ethylmercury chloride and phenylmercuric chloride in cultured human lymphocytes and other mammalian cells. CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS have also been produced in larvae and newt embryos (IARC, 1993).
    c) DOMINANT LETHAL MUTATION has been reported in studies of rats exposed to methyl mercury chloride. Evidence of dominant lethal mutation has not been clearly produced in mice (IARC, 1993).
    d) Positive and negative evidence of GENE MUTATION has been reported in cultured Chinese hamster V79 cells. Sex-linked recessive lethal mutations have been produced in Drosophila melanogaster following exposure to methylmercury hydroxide (IARC, 1993).
    e) ANEUPLOIDY was produced in Drosophila melanogaster by methyl mercury chloride, methyl mercury hydroxide,phenylmercuric hydroxide and phenyl mercury acetate (IARC, 1993).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) A basic metabolic panel including renal function tests should be followed since toxicity may be delayed.
    B) Whole blood mercury levels are the preferred diagnostic test. Blood should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the appropriate reference laboratory. The whole blood mercury should be speciated to inorganic and organic fractions. Patients should abstain from fish meals for 1 week prior to testing. Levels of 10 to 15 mcg/L are common in patients eating several fish meals per week. Levels over 200 mcg/L have been associated with symptoms.
    C) Hair testing is useful in documenting a remote exposure only, but it has no role in quantification of the exposure.
    D) Obtain 24-hour urine collection for long-chain aryl or alkyl mercury compounds (eg, phenylmercury). Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is cleared through biliary and gastrointestinal tract.
    E) Chest x-ray should be obtained for inhalational exposures. Serial visual field testing and neuropsychiatric testing is useful for chronic toxicity monitoring.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Obtain whole blood mercury levels in acute exposures. Obtain baseline BUN, creatinine and electrolytes.
    2) Blood analysis is useful for identifying acute exposure (Barregard, 1993) and may reflect the body burden of methylmercury.
    a) LIMITATIONS: Blood analysis is useful only for detecting acute exposure immediately after it has occurred, since blood mercury levels rapidly decline after exposure. Whole blood mercury concentrations are most useful in cases of acute high dose exposure. Plasma mercury concentrations may be more useful for monitoring low level exposure (US DHHS, 1992).
    3) NORMAL WHOLE BLOOD MERCURY CONCENTRATION: Whole blood mercury levels rarely exceed 1.5 mcg/dL in unexposed individuals (US DHHS, 1992). In acute situations, elevation of blood-mercury level to ranges of 25 to 50 mcg/dL (1246.2 to 2492.5 nmol/L) precede elevations in urinary excretion because of the body's capacity to store mercury (Cherian, 1978).
    4) CONCENTRATION AT WHICH SYMPTOMS MAY OCCUR: Symptoms of toxicity may occur at blood mercury concentrations of 5 ug/dL or greater. Symptoms do not always correlate with blood mercury levels.
    5) SEAFOOD: The use of blood mercury levels after acute exposure should be considered with the knowledge that a single seafood meal will elevate levels for 20 to 30 hours (Kershaw et al, 1980; Sherlock et al, 1984).
    6) OTHER SERUM/BLOOD ASSAYS: The measurement of glomerular basement antibodies (alpha-GBMs) in serum is being studied as a biological indicator of chronic elemental mercury vapor exposure and renal effects (Ellingsen et al, 1993).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) The following procedures should be ordered: 24 hour urine collection for long-chain aryl or alkyl mercury compounds (eg; phenylmercury), creatinine and urinalysis. Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is excreted via the bile into the feces.
    2) URINARY MERCURY is the best biological marker for chronic ELEMENTAL, INORGANIC, OR LONG-CHAIN ARYL OR ALKYL (eg; phenylmercury) mercury exposure. Urinary mercury concentrations are also useful for assessing the response to chelation therapy.
    a) One study (n=24) evaluated urinary mercury excretion before and after DMSA therapy in healthy fish eaters (two groups 1 to 2 fish servings per week or 3 or more servings per week) and non-fish eaters, to determine whether urine mercury excretion after DMSA would rise above baseline levels to a greater extent in fish eaters. In all patients, blood mercury concentrations and 12-hour urine mercury and creatinine excretions were obtained before and after DMSA therapy (30 mg/kg). Although fish eaters had higher baseline blood mercury concentrations than non-fish eaters (p=0.001), the baseline urinary mercury excretion did not differ between groups (explained by the predominant excretion of alkylmercury in bile as opposed to predominant urinary excretion of inorganic mercury). DMSA therapy increased median urinary mercury excretion in all groups, which was highest in fish eaters (p=0.04). The authors concluded that a simple rise in chelated mercury excretion over baseline excretion is not a reliable diagnostic indicator of mercury poisoning (Ruha et al, 2009).
    3) LIMITATIONS: Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is excreted via the bile into the feces (US DHHS, 1992) as inorganic mercury, after undergoing demethylation by microorganisms in the gut (Smith et al, 1994). Blood mercury concentration is a better determinant of total body methylmercury (Sue, 1994).
    4) The patient should avoid seafood consumption for several days to a week prior to urine collection, as many types of seafood contain organic mercury.
    5) NORMAL URINARY MERCURY CONCENTRATION: Urinary mercury concentrations in unexposed adults are usually less than 20 mcg/L (US DHHS, 1992).
    6) CONCENTRATION AT WHICH SYMPTOMS MAY OCCUR: Signs and symptoms of toxicity may begin to occur at urinary mercury concentrations of 20 to 100 mcg/L. Urinary mercury levels, however, often do NOT correlate with clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity.
    7) 24-HOUR URINE COLLECTION: There is a high degree of intraindividual variation in urine mercury levels. The averaging of several urinary mercury determinations may be required (Barregard, 1993).
    a) Collection of a 24-hour urine sample, followed by challenge with D-penicillamine for 4 days, has been used to document mercury body burden (Ishihara et al, 1974).
    8) SPOT MERCURY LEVELS: Spot sample collecting can be used to approximate the 24-hour sample (Barregard, 1993). A first morning void is often used.
    a) The interpretation of these levels is most accurate when samples are taken at the same time of day and are corrected for specific gravity or, more preferably, creatinine (US DHHS, 1992; Calder et al, 1984).
    B) OTHER
    1) 24 HOUR URINARY DELTA AMINOLEVULINIC ACID (ALA) levels are elevated to 3 to 10 mg/L in chronic mercury poisoning cases. Although urinary levels as high as 2000 mcg/L have been seen without symptoms, behavioral and neurological evaluation should be performed if levels are greater than 100 mcg/L (Adams et al, 1983).
    2) Urinary measurements of proteins (Abdelmegid et al, 1993; Snodgrass et al, 1981; Rosenmann et al, 1986) Ehrenberg, 1991), porphyrin profiles (Woods et al, 1993), N-acetyl beta-glucosaminidase (NAG) and NAG isoenzymes (Rosenmann et al, 1986; Ellingsen et al, 1993), beta(2)-microglobulin (US DHHS, 1992; Sue, 1994), and intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Verpooten et al, 1992) have been used in attempts to identify early effects of organic or inorganic mercury exposure.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) HAIR
    a) Measurement of mercury in the hair can be used to confirm exposure to methyl mercury compounds, but is not useful for monitoring exposure to elemental mercury or other inorganic mercury compounds (US DHHS, 1992; IARC, 1993). Hair mercury levels are positively correlated with blood methyl mercury levels (Baselt, 2000; Friberg & Elinder, 1993).
    b) Analysis of hair segments can provide an estimation of the time and extent of methyl mercury exposure, with new growth reflecting the most current exposure status. An average rate of uniform hair growth is 1.1 cm/month (Shahristani & Shihab, 1974).
    c) Mercury levels in the hair of mothers, and of neonates exposed to methyl mercury during gestation have been used to document exposure and adverse effects (Marsh et al, 1987).
    d) LIMITATIONS - Differences in the hair growth rate of individual hair strands, and misalignment of hair within a sample bundle have limited the usefulness of hair analysis in pharmacokinetic modeling of methyl mercury in humans (Smith et al, 1994).
    1) The potential for external contamination of hair strands with mercury from the environment is another limitation. External mercury should be removed from the hair before analysis.
    2) TOENAILS
    a) Toenails mercury concentrations measured by neutron activation have been used in studies to evaluate mercury exposure and the risk of coronary heart disease (Yoshizawa et al, 2002; Guallar et al, 2002).
    3) MRI
    a) Atrophy of the cerebellar vermis and hemispheres, the calcarine cortex and the postcentral gyrus is seen on MR findings following methylmercury poisoning. Dilatation of the calcarine sulcus due to atrophy of the calcarine cortex has been demonstrated and the parieto-occipital sulcus is dilated. Major findings have also included shrinkage of the folia and widening of the sulci in the cerebellar vermis and cerebellar hemispheres. Brain stem and middle cerebellar peduncle are intact. A granular type of cerebellar atrophy is seen; Purkinje cells are left in tact. The cortex at the surface of the cerebellum is relatively spared, while changes are most advanced in the depths of the sulci (Korogi et al, 1998).
    b) In cases of fatalities due to acute organic mercury exposures, examination of brain tissue have shown loss of neurons with reactive proliferation of glial cells, microcavitation, vascular congestion, petechial hemorrhage, and edema in the cerebellar cortex. Preservation of Purkinje cells have been noted (Eto et al, 1999).
    4) BIOPSY AND AUTOPSY
    a) A sural nerve biopsy of a 64-year-old fisherman with Minamata disease (mercury poisoning) revealed endoneurial fibrosis and regenerated myelin sheaths. A month later he died of massive hemorrhage from gastroduodenal ulcer. At autopsy, the dorsal roots and sural nerve revealed endoneurial fibrosis, loss of nerve fibers, and presence of Bungner's hands. Wallerian degeneration of the fasciculus gracilis (Goll's tract) in the spinal cord with relative preservation of neurons in sensory ganglia was observed (Eto et al, 2002).
    5) ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL TESTING
    a) Nerve conduction velocity studies have been used to evaluate mercury toxicity in workers chronically exposed to inorganic mercury (Singer et al, 1987). Slowing of the median motor nerve correlated with both increased blood and urine mercury levels and an increased number of neurologic symptoms has been reported (Singer et al, 1987).
    6) NEUROPSYCHOLOGCIAL TESTING
    a) Psychometric tests have been used to detect early toxic effects of organic and inorganic mercury exposure (Sue, 1994).
    b) Liang et al (1993) and Langworth et al (1992) reported the use of tests to identify subtle psychological and neurological effects of elemental mercury. The tests included the Questionnaire 16 survey of symptoms, the Eysenck Personality Inventory, the Profile of Mood State, and the Chinese version Neurobehavioral Evaluation System which measures domains of intelligence, memory, visual perception, and psychomotor skills (Liang et al, 1993; Langworth et al, 1992).
    c) Yeates & Mortensen (1994) described the use of an extensive battery of tests to monitor neuropsychological effects of mercury vapor exposure in 2 adolescents. Vocabulary, verbal repetition, memory skills, visual-motor abilities, sensory/motor function, sorting, and categorization skills were assessed through these tests (Yeates & Mortensen, 1994).
    d) Soleo et al (1990) described the use of the Gordon Personal Profile, Simple Reaction Time test, Benton Visual Recognition test, Santa Ana Dexterity test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and the Clinical Depression Questionnaire to evaluate workers at a fluorescent lamp factory (Soleo et al, 1990).
    1) These tests, excluding the Gordon Personal Profile, are part of the WHO test batter to detect preclinical signs of neurological impairment.
    7) OTHER
    a) Clinically apparent tremors often occur with chronic mercury poisoning (Knight, 1988). Chapman et al (1990) described methods of measuring tremor frequency and other tremor characteristics which may enable identification of subtle neurological effects before clinical signs of poisoning are evident (Chapman et al, 1990).

Methods

    A) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) Blood, urine and hair are most commonly analyzed for mercury content.
    2) The most reliable and common analytical method for blood mercury levels is cold vapor atomic absorption (IARC, 1993).
    a) Winfield et al (1994) describe adaptation of a cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometric method, which enables detection of very low levels of total mercury, and can differentiate between inorganic and organic mercury (Winfield et al, 1994).
    b) Thin-layer and gas chromatographic methods can also distinguish between organic and inorganic mercury in biological samples (IARC, 1993; Sue, 1994).
    3) The neutron activation procedure for urinary mercury analysis is reported by the WHO as the most accurate and sensitive method for urinary analysis of mercury (IARC, 1993). Cold vapor atomic absorption is also commonly used. Urinary monitoring for methyl mercury exposure is not useful due to excretion principally via the fecal route.
    4) Hair can be analyzed to confirm exposure to methyl mercury, and to estimate the time and extent of exposure. Single hair strands can be analyzed by x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry without destroying the hair sample (Toribara et al, 1982).
    a) A procedure for determination of mercury in hair by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry with a new reaction vessel is suited for use with a large number of samples (Pineau et al, 1990). Cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry can differentiate between inorganic and organic mercury.
    5) Atomic absorption, gas chromatography and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography can be used to speciate the type of mercury in biological samples (IARC, 1993). Other analytical methods typically used in quantitating mercury in biological tissues include neutron activation analysis, atomic fluorescence spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry, and spark source spectrometry (IARC, 1993).
    6) COLD VAPOR ATOMIC FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY reportedly is an accurate, reliable and sensitive method for determining total mercury concentrations in human breast milk, urine, monkey kidney tissue, and feces.
    a) This method is useful for monitoring chronic exposure to low levels of elemental mercury vapor, and can be adapted in order to differentiate organic mercury from inorganic mercury (Winfield et al, 1994).
    7) DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) has been used to measure mercury in simulated stomach contents (Winstanley et al, 1987). The lower limit of detection was 10 mcg/mL. This method may not detect mercury at concentrations which are near the normal limits.
    8) RADIOCHEMICAL NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS has been used to measure mercury in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 10 subjects occupationally exposed to mercury vapors (Sallsten et al, 1994).
    a) The CSF mercury concentrations were very low, but correlated with plasma concentrations of mercury. The plasma concentrations of mercury appeared to provide a better indication of exposure than CSF mercury.
    9) Simultaneous determination of inorganic, monomethyl, and total mercury can be accomplished in biological samples by digestion in methanolic potassium hydroxide, followed by ethylation and gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS). Limits of detection are 1.3 pg inorganic mercury and 0.6 pg monomethyl mercury (Liang et al, 1994).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All patients with an exposure to dimethylmercury should be admitted. All acute ingestions should be admitted. Patients with moderate or severe neurologic toxicity felt to be secondary to organic mercury warrant inpatient evaluation for neurology and toxicology consultation, whole blood quantification, and evaluation for possible chelation.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with chronic exposures can be referred to outpatient healthcare providers for evaluation.
    B) Unintentional pediatric ingestions of mercurochrome can be managed in the home without gastrointestinal decontamination. In a retrospective series of 2250 cases of mercurochrome exposure (96 percent unintentional, 93.6 percent ingestions, 84.4 percent children) most patients remained asymptomatic. Minor manifestations (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea) developed in 3.3 percent of patients and moderate manifestations developed in 7 patients (0.4%). Most patients (95.8 percent) were treated with dilution or irrigation only (Bryan & Krenzelok, 1996).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All cases with organic mercury toxicity should involve a toxicology and neurology consultants.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chronic exposures already in healthcare facilities may be observed and referred to neurology or toxicology outpatient providers. All patients with acute exposures should be referred to a healthcare facility.

Monitoring

    A) A basic metabolic panel including renal function tests should be followed since toxicity may be delayed.
    B) Whole blood mercury levels are the preferred diagnostic test. Blood should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the appropriate reference laboratory. The whole blood mercury should be speciated to inorganic and organic fractions. Patients should abstain from fish meals for 1 week prior to testing. Levels of 10 to 15 mcg/L are common in patients eating several fish meals per week. Levels over 200 mcg/L have been associated with symptoms.
    C) Hair testing is useful in documenting a remote exposure only, but it has no role in quantification of the exposure.
    D) Obtain 24-hour urine collection for long-chain aryl or alkyl mercury compounds (eg, phenylmercury). Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is cleared through biliary and gastrointestinal tract.
    E) Chest x-ray should be obtained for inhalational exposures. Serial visual field testing and neuropsychiatric testing is useful for chronic toxicity monitoring.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Dermal exposures should be washed off with soap and water. No other prehospital decontamination is indicated. Organic mercury spills should be contained and cleaned by qualified hazardous material abatement crews.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Most presentations are subacute or chronic exposures, making gastrointestinal decontamination ineffective. However, given the dismal outcomes and limited therapeutic options, aggressive gastrointestinal decontamination including gastric lavage, activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation is recommended for acute ingestions. Abdominal x-ray may be useful in evaluating the need for gastric lavage. Breastfeeding mothers should continue to pump breast milk and discard.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    2) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    3) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    4) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) A basic metabolic panel including renal function tests should be followed since toxicity may be delayed.
    2) Whole blood mercury levels are the preferred diagnostic test. Blood should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the appropriate reference laboratory. The whole blood mercury should be speciated to inorganic and organic fractions. Patients should abstain from fish meals for 1 week prior to testing. Levels of 10 to 15 mcg/L are common in patients eating several fish meals per week. Levels over 200 mcg/L have been associated with symptoms.
    3) Hair testing is useful in documenting a remote exposure only, but it has no role in quantification of the exposure.
    4) Obtain 24-hour urine collection for long-chain aryl or alkyl mercury compounds (eg, phenylmercury). Urinary mercury levels are NOT useful for determining methylmercury (a short-chain alkyl mercury compound) exposure, since approximately 90% of methyl mercury is cleared through biliary and gastrointestinal tract.
    5) Chest x-ray should be obtained for inhalational exposures. Serial visual field testing and neuropsychiatric testing is useful for chronic toxicity monitoring.
    B) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) Chelation should be performed with one of the following drugs in severe poisonings. For patients with severe poisoning, intravenous unithiol is the preferred initial chelator if it is available (available in Europe and through compounding pharmacies in the US).
    2) All of the effective complexing agents administered to facilitate removal of mercury from the body contain sulfhydryl groups (Clarkson, 1990).
    C) UNITHIOL
    1) DMPS/INDICATIONS: Chelating agent for heavy metal toxicities associated with arsenic, bismuth, copper, lead and mercury (Blanusa et al, 2005).
    2) DMPS/DOSING
    a) ACUTE TOXICITY
    1) ADULT ORAL DOSE:
    a) 1200 to 2400 mg/day in equally divided doses (100 to 200 mg 12 times daily) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    2) ADULT INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    a) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    b) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    c) First 24 hours: 250 mg intravenously every 3 to 4 hours (1500 to 2000 mg total).
    d) Day two: 250 mg intravenously every 4 to 6 hours (1000 to 1500 mg total).
    e) Day three: 250 mg intravenously every 6 to 8 hours (750 to 1000 mg total).
    f) Day four: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 12 hours (500 to 750 mg total).
    g) Subsequent days: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (250 to 750 mg total).
    h) Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route.
    3) PEDIATRIC ORAL DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005):
    a) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    b) Initial dose: 20 to 30 mg/kg/day orally in many equal divided doses.
    c) Maintenance dose: 1.5 to 15 mg/kg/day.
    4) PEDIATRIC INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    a) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    b) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    c) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    d) First 24 hours: 5 mg/kg intravenously every four hours (total 30 mg/kg).
    e) Day two: 5 mg/kg intravenously every six hours (total 20 mg/kg).
    f) Days three and four: 5 mg/kg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (total 5 to 15 mg/kg).
    b) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    1) ADULT DOSE
    a) 300 to 400 mg/day orally (in single doses of 100 to 200 mg). The dose may be increased in severe toxicity (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    c) DMPS/ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Chills, fever, and allergic skin reactions such as itching, exanthema or maculopapular rash are possible (Hla et al, 1992; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). Cardiovascular effects such as hypotension, nausea, dizziness or weakness may occur with too rapid injection of DMPS. Hypotensive effects are irreversible at very high doses (300 mg/kg) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013).
    3) SOURCES
    a) DMPS is not FDA-approved, but is available outside of the US from Heyl Chem-pharm Fabrik in Germany (Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). In the US it may be obtained from some compounding pharmacies.
    4) EFFICACY
    a) In a group of patients with chronic methyl mercury poisoning, DMPS therapy was associated with a mercury half life of 10 days compared with half lives of 65 and 61 days in untreated and placebo treated controls, respectively (Clarkson et al, 1981).
    b) In a patient with acute methyl mercury ingestion, DMPS was more effective than penicillamine in increasing urinary mercury excretion (Lund et al, 1984).
    5) ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) SKIN REACTIONS: Urticaria, maculopapular rash, and erythema multiforme (Hla et al, 1992).
    D) SUCCIMER
    1) EFFICACY
    a) Succimer is an effective mercury chelator with minimal side effects (Clarkson, 1990; Graziano, 1986; Graziano et al, 1978; Graziano et al, 1985; Kosnett et al, 1989). It has been shown to increase urinary mercury excretion and decrease brain levels of mercury in experimental animal models of methyl mercury poisoning (Aaseth & Friedheim, 1978; Kostyniak, 1983; Magos et al, 1978).
    1) One study (n=24) evaluated urinary mercury excretion before and after succimer therapy in healthy fish eaters (two groups 1 to 2 fish servings per week or 3 or more servings per week) and non-fish eaters, to determine whether urine mercury excretion after succimer would rise above baseline levels to a greater extent in fish eaters. In all patients, blood mercury concentrations and 12-hour urine mercury and creatinine excretions were obtained before and after succimer therapy (30 mg/kg). Although fish eaters had higher baseline blood mercury concentrations than non-fish eaters (p=0.001), the baseline urinary mercury excretion did not differ between groups (explained by the predominant excretion of alkylmercury in bile as opposed to predominant urinary excretion of inorganic mercury). Succimer therapy increased median urinary mercury excretion in all groups, which was highest in fish eaters (p=0.04). The authors concluded that a simple rise in chelated mercury excretion over baseline excretion is not a reliable diagnostic indicator of mercury poisoning (Ruha et al, 2009).
    b) In a rat model of methyl mercury poisoning, succimer therapy begun after the onset of functional neurologic disturbances prevented the progression of cerebellar damage, reduced brain mercury content, and was associated with some improvement in neurologic findings compared with untreated rats (Magos et al, 1978).
    2) SUCCIMER/DOSE/ADMINISTRATION
    a) PEDIATRIC: Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval is then increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless blood lead concentrations indicate the need for prompt retreatment.
    2) Succimer capsule contents may be administered mixed in a small amount of food (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) ADULT: Succimer is not FDA approved for use in adults, however it has been shown to be safe and effective when used to treat adults with poisoning from a variety of heavy metals (Fournier et al, 1988). Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval then is increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless the patient's symptoms or blood concentrations indicate a need for more prompt treatment (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    3) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) The manufacturer recommends monitoring liver enzymes and complete blood count with differential and platelet count prior to the start of therapy and at least weekly during therapy (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) Succimer therapy did not worsen preexisting borderline abnormal liver enzyme levels in a prospective evaluation of 15 children with lead poisoning (Kuntzelman & Angle, 1992).
    4) SUCCIMER/ADVERSE EFFECTS: The following adverse events have occurred in children and adults during clinical trials: nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; transient liver enzyme elevations; rash, pruritus; drowsiness and paresthesia. Events reported infrequently include: sore throat, rhinorrhea, mucosal vesicular eruption, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia, and mild to moderate neutropenia (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    5) ODOR: Succimer has a sulfurous odor that may be evident in the patient's breath or urine (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2005).
    6) HYPERTHERMIA: One adult developed acute severe hyperthermia associated with hypotension; rechallenge resulted in hyperthermia with shaking chills and hypertension (Marcus et al, 1991).
    7) AVAILABLE FORMS: Succimer (Chemet (R)), 100 mg capsules (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    8) CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old woman developed severe neurotoxicity 5 months after allegedly spilling several drops of dimethyl mercury on her hand while wearing protective gloves. Succimer increased urinary mercury excretion from 257 mcg/24 hours to 39,800 mcg/24 hours but did not affect clinical outcome (Nierenberg et al, 1998).
    E) PENICILLAMINE
    1) EFFICACY
    a) Penicillamine has been shown to increase urinary mercury excretion (Pierce et al, 1972) and decrease blood mercury levels (Bakir et al, 1976) in patients poisoned with methyl mercury.
    b) In a group of patients with chronic methyl mercury poisoning, penicillamine therapy was associated with a mercury half-life of 26 days compared with half lives of 65 and 61 days in untreated and placebo treated controls, respectively (Clarkson et al, 1981).
    2) USUAL ADULT DOSE
    a) 1 to 1.5 g/day given orally in 4 divided doses (Nelson, 2011).
    3) USUAL PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 15 to 30 mg/kg/day in 3 to 4 divided doses. Initially, a small dose may be given to minimize side effects and then increased gradually (eg, 25% of the desired dose in week 1, 50% in week 2, and the full dose by week 3) (Caravati, 2004; Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    4) ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) COMMON SIDE EFFECTS/CHRONIC DOSING: Fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, proteinuria, and myalgia(Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    1) SERIOUS ADVERSE EFFECTS: Nephrotic syndrome, hypersensitivity reactions, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and various autoimmune responses (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009; Feehally et al, 1987; Kay, 1986).
    5) DURATION OF THERAPY
    a) Administer d-penicillamine for 3 to 10 days with daily monitoring of urinary excretion of mercury. If urine mercury falls rapidly, body burden is probably small. Wait 10 days and repeat after a baseline collection to determine if there is a rise on re-chelation therapy indicating further body burden.
    b) Repeated courses of D-penicillamine may be required. Regular follow-up of blood and urine mercury levels will establish need for treatment.
    6) CAUTIONS
    a) Patients allergic to penicillin products may have cross-sensitivity to penicillamine (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    b) Monitor for proteinuria and hematuria; heavy metals may also cause renal toxicity (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    c) Monitor CBC with differential, platelet count, and hepatic enzymes (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    d) CROSS-REACTIVITY: The use of penicillamine in a patient with penicillin allergy is controversial.
    1) While positive penicillamine skin tests have been reported in 2.5 to 10 percent of patients with history of penicillin allergy, the risk of rash or anaphylaxis in these patients is unknown. One such patient did not react when challenged with oral penicillamine (Bell & Graziano, 1983).
    7) PREGNANCY
    a) Penicillamine is considered FDA pregnancy category D(Prod Info CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, 2004); it should be avoided if possible in pregnant patients.
    b) Use of penicillamine throughout pregnancy has been associated with connective tissue abnormalities, hydrocephalus, cerebral palsy, cardiac and great vessel anomalies, webbing of fingers and toes, and arthrogryposis multipex (Linares et al, 1979; Solomon et al, 1977; Anon, 1981; Beck et al, 1981; Rosa, 1986). However, the teratogenic effect when used in low doses or for short periods of time, as in metal chelation, has yet to be determined.
    8) IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTION
    a) Anuria or other evidence of renal dysfunction makes therapy with d-penicillamine dangerous as the main route of elimination of this complex is renal.
    F) N-ACETYL-PENICILLAMINE
    1) DOSE: Oral N-acetyl penicillamine (NAP) 250 mg to 500 mg, 4 times a day for 6 to 10 days (30 mg/kg/day in children) has been associated with increased urinary mercury excretion (Kark et al, 1971; Hryhorczuk et al, 1982; Gledhill & Hopkins, 1972).
    2) AVAILABILITY: NAP is still considered experimental and is not generally available as a medicinal preparation.
    3) EFFICACY
    a) In the Iraq outbreak of methyl mercury poisoning from fungicide-treated wheat NAP was equally effective as d-penicillamine; both resulted in mercury blood half-life of 24 to 26 days, while untreated patients had mean half-lives of 61 to 65 days (Clarkson et al, 1981).
    b) NAP has been shown to increase urinary excretion of mercury and decrease brain levels of mercury in animal models of methyl mercury poisoning (Aaseth & Friedheim, 1978; Zimmer & Carter, 1979; Aaseth & Friedheim, 1978).
    G) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) THIOL RESIN - EFFICACY
    a) In a group of patients with chronic methyl mercury poisoning, thiolated resin therapy was associated with a mercury half life of 20 days compared with half lives of 65 and 61 days in untreated and placebo treated controls, respectively (Clarkson et al, 1981).
    b) Mercaptostarch, a thiol resin, has been shown to increase fecal elimination of methyl mercury in a mouse model (Aaseth & Friedheim, 1978).
    H) DIMERCAPROL
    1) BAL therapy has been shown to increase brain mercury levels in experimental animal models of methyl mercury (Berlin et al, 1965; Zimmer & Carter, 1979) and phenylmercuric acetate poisoning (Berlin & Rylander, 1964). It is CONTRAINDICATED in methyl mercury poisoning (Clarkson, 1990).
    I) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) NAC therapy has been shown to reduce methyl mercury-induced fetal mortality and teratogenicity in rodent models (Ornagi et al, 1993).
    2) Dialysis performed with n-acetylcysteine infused into the blood as it entered the dialyzer at a rate to produce a 10 millimolar concentration, produced a mean dialysance of 13 milliliters/minute and was associated with a 40-fold increase in urinary mercury excretion in a patient with acute methyl mercury ingestion (Lund et al, 1984).
    3) STUDY: Methyl mercury poisoned mice were administered NAC in their drinking water (10 mg/mL) starting at 48 hours after poisoning. NAC-treated mice excreted from 47% to 54% of the radio-labelled mercury in their urine over the next 48 hours, as compared to 4% to 10% excretion in untreated mice. Excretion of inorganic mercury was not affected by oral NAC (Ballatori et al, 1998).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treat pulmonary irritation and systemic effects.
    2) Inhalation of alkyl mercury compounds may produce irritation of the mucous membranes. The irritation generally disappears shortly after cessation of exposure (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    3) Inhalation of some volatile organic mercury compounds may produce systemic toxicity. Phenyl mercury acetate containing latex paint may release mercury vapors (Agocs et al, 1990; CDC, 1990).
    a) Acute inhalation exposure to mercury vapor from can produce local pulmonary effects, systemic effects and elevated urine mercury concentrations (Levin et al, 1988; Agocs et al, 1990). Chelation may be required.
    B) MEASUREMENT OF RESPIRATORY FUNCTION
    1) PULMONARY FUNCTION: Mild interstitial lung disease has been noted in acute mercury vapor exposure. Pulmonary function tests and chest x-ray may be of value in patients with significant exposure.
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    B) PERSONNEL PROTECTION
    1) In cases of significant exposure prehospital decontamination should occur outside the medical facility if possible since the wash may contaminate medical personnel and cause them to become poisoned.
    2) Remove all contaminated clothing, seal into bags, and treat as hazardous waste. The person performing decontamination may be protected by wearing rubber gloves, disposable shoe covers, and a rubber apron.
    3) All medical personnel should wear protective clothing, including respirators if significant amounts of dust are present, to prevent secondary contamination.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) BURN
    1) APPLICATION
    a) These recommendations apply to patients with MINOR chemical burns (FIRST DEGREE; SECOND DEGREE: less than 15% body surface area in adults; less than 10% body surface area in children; THIRD DEGREE: less than 2% body surface area). Consultation with a clinician experienced in burn therapy or a burn unit should be obtained if larger area or more severe burns are present. Neutralizing agents should NOT be used.
    2) DEBRIDEMENT
    a) After initial flushing with large volumes of water to remove any residual chemical material, clean wounds with a mild disinfectant soap and water.
    b) DEVITALIZED SKIN: Loose, nonviable tissue should be removed by gentle cleansing with surgical soap or formal skin debridement (Moylan, 1980; Haynes, 1981). Intravenous analgesia may be required (Roberts, 1988).
    c) BLISTERS: Removal and debridement of closed blisters is controversial. Current consensus is that intact blisters prevent pain and dehydration, promote healing, and allow motion; therefore, blisters should be left intact until they rupture spontaneously or healing is well underway, unless they are extremely large or inhibit motion (Roberts, 1988; Carvajal & Stewart, 1987).
    3) TREATMENT
    a) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS: Prophylactic topical antibiotic therapy with silver sulfadiazine is recommended for all burns except superficial partial thickness (first-degree) burns (Roberts, 1988). For first-degree burns bacitracin may be used, but effectiveness is not documented (Roberts, 1988).
    b) SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS: Systemic antibiotics are generally not indicated unless infection is present or the burn involves the hands, feet, or perineum.
    c) WOUND DRESSING:
    1) Depending on the site and area, the burn may be treated open (face, ears, or perineum) or covered with sterile nonstick porous gauze. The gauze dressing should be fluffy and thick enough to absorb all drainage.
    2) Alternatively, a petrolatum fine-mesh gauze dressing may be used alone on partial-thickness burns.
    d) DRESSING CHANGES:
    1) Daily dressing changes are indicated if a burn cream is used; changes every 3 to 4 days are adequate with a dry dressing.
    2) If dressing changes are to be done at home, the patient or caregiver should be instructed in proper techniques and given sufficient dressings and other necessary supplies.
    e) Analgesics such as acetaminophen with codeine may be used for pain relief if needed.
    4) TETANUS PROPHYLAXIS
    a) The patient's tetanus immunization status should be determined. Tetanus toxoid 0.5 milliliter intramuscularly or other indicated tetanus prophylaxis should be administered if required.
    B) OBSERVATION REGIMES
    1) Carefully observe patients with SKIN exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, and exchange perfusion do not remove significant amounts of mercury after subacute or chronic organic mercury exposure. Hemodialysis in combination with L-cysteine infusion into the arterial blood has been shown to increase mercury clearance in chronic methylmercury intoxication, (L-cysteine converts methylmercury into a diffusible form) but it has not known if this improves outcomes.
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis has not been shown to reduce a significant amount of the total body burden following acute or chronic ingestion but should be considered early in severely symptomatic patients with diminished urine output (Sauder et al, 1988).
    C) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    1) Peritoneal dialysis and BAL therapy were associated with a mercury clearance rate of 0.07 to 0.68 mL/minute in a 3-month-old with mercury toxicity from mercaptomerin therapy (Robillard et al, 1976).
    D) HEMOFILTRATION
    1) Hemofiltration has not been studied for organic mercury poisoning. Hemofiltration, begun on the fourth day after overdose of 7 grams of mercuric chloride, removed 1.926 mg of mercury per 24 hours (McLauchlan, 1991).
    E) EXTRACORPOREAL REGIONAL COMPLEXING HEMODIALYSIS
    1) In a dog model Extracorporeal Regional Complexing Hemodialysis (ERCH), using DMSA or cysteine via arterial infusion, produced mercury clearance rates of 25 milliliters/minute and 17 milliliters/minute, respectively (Kostyniak et al, 1977; Kostyniak, 1982).
    2) ERCH - using cysteine as the complexing agent increased mercury clearance in 2 patients with chronic methyl mercury intoxication (Bakir et al, 1980).
    F) EXCHANGE TRANSFUSION
    1) Exchange transfusion performed on 3 children with chronic methyl mercury intoxication was estimated to remove 6% of the body burden, compared with 1% within 24 hours by natural excretion (Bakir et al, 1980).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The US EPA has set a daily lifetime dose (oral reference dose) of 0.1 mcg/kg/day for methylmercury. It is believed that this dose is not associated with any potential hazards. The estimated minimum lethal dose of methyl mercury for a 70-kg person ranges from 20 to 60 mg/kg. Unintentional pediatric ingestions of mercurochrome are NOT associated with significant toxicity. Topical preparations such as merbromin (mercurochrome) have limited dermal absorption; however, exposure to excoriated surfaces or mucous membranes may yield toxicity. Dimethylmercury is the most toxic of the organic mercurials and even minute dermal exposures may lead to rapidly progressive cerebellar deficits, coma, and subsequent death.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) The US EPA has estimated that the minimum lethal dose of methyl mercury for a 70-kg person ranges from 20 to 60 mg/kg (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
    B) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INGESTION (ESTIMATES/TOXICITY RATINGS)
    a) In a retrospective series of 2250 cases of mercurochrome exposure 96% unintentional, 93.6% ingestions, 84.4% children most patients remained asymptomatic. Minor manifestations (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea) developed in 3.3% of patients and moderate manifestations developed in 7 patients (0.4%). Most patients (95.8%) were treated with dilution or irrigation only. Unintentional pediatric ingestions of mercurochrome can be managed in the home without gastrointestinal decontamination (Bryan & Krenzelok, 1996).
    b) There is little published information concerning the range of toxicity for many consumer products which contain organic mercury (Baselt, 2000; Gosselin et al, 1984).
    1) One source gave mercurochrome (merbromin) and thimerosal (thiomersalate) a toxicity rating of 4: very toxic (Gosselin et al, 1984).
    c) One source rated the following mercury compounds extremely toxic: phenylmercuric salts of organic acids (eg, acetate, salicylate, oleate, benzoate, phthalate, and gluconate), methoxyethylmercuric chloride, ethyl and methyl mercuric chlorides, and ethyl and methyl mercuric phosphates. The oral lethal dose in adult humans is estimated as 5 to 50 mg/kg (Gosselin et al, 1984).
    C) CASE REPORTS
    1) INGESTION
    a) An adolescent developed mild clinical effects (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and dizziness) with elevated blood and urine mercury levels after ingesting 20 milliliters of a 2% solution of mercurochrome (Magarey, 1993).
    b) An adult developed severe effects (hemorrhagic gastritis, renal failure, polyneuropathy) but survived with intensive medical therapy and chelation after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996).
    2) DERMAL
    a) DIMETHYLMERCURY: An accidental spill of several drops of dimethylmercury onto the gloved hand of a female chemist resulted in the onset of diarrhea and nausea 2 months later which persisted for 3 months, then was followed by severe CNS toxicity, with profound effects on the cerebellum and eventual death, about 5 to 6 months post-exposure. Estimated initial body burden of mercury was approximately 1,344 mg (Siegler et al, 1999).
    b) DIMETHYLMERCURY: A 48-year-old woman developed severe neurotoxicity 5 months after allegedly spilling several drops of dimethylmercury on her hand while wearing protective gloves. She died 10 months after exposure despite chelation therapy. The estimated absorbed dose (extrapolated from blood levels at presentation) was 1334 mg, or 0.44 mL of liquid dimethylmercury (Nierenberg et al, 1998).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) The US EPA has set a daily lifetime dose (oral reference dose) of 0.1 mcg/kg/day for methylmercury. It is believed that this dose is not associated with any potential hazards (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
    B) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) TOXIC ORAL DOSE
    a) Ingestion of 20 mL of 2% Merbromin by an adolescent resulted in nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dizziness and elevated blood mercury levels in a 15-year-old female (Magarey, 1993).
    b) A 44-year-old man developed polyuric acute renal failure, coma, ascending sensorimotor neuropathy and respiratory failure after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal (Pfab et al, 1996).
    2) TOXIC INHALATION DOSE
    a) Some organic mercury compounds are volatile and will produce toxic vapors. Examples of these compounds include methyl mercury, dimethyl mercury, ethyl mercuric chloride (chloroethylmercury) and ethyl mercury phosphate. Inhalation of aerosols, dusts or particulates may also result in adverse effects.
    b) Proteinuria and subtle neurological and psychological effects have occurred following exposure to airborne mercury concentrations of 0.01 mg/m3 (US DHHS, 1992).
    c) The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has recommended a threshold limit value (Time Weighted Average, TWA) of 0.01 mg/m3 for alkyl mercury compounds, and of 0.1 mg/m(3) for aryl compounds (ACGIH, 1994).
    1) Threshold limit values are airborne concentrations under which WORKERS may be repeatedly exposed on a daily basis without suffering adverse health effects. Adverse effects may occur at exposure levels above the recommended TLV (ACGIH, 1994).
    d) The OSHA permissible exposure limit (Time Weighted Average, TWA) for organo alkyl mercury compounds is 0.01 mg/m(3). The TWA is the average airborne concentration to which a WORKER may be exposed in any 8 hour shift of a 40 hour work week. This concentration should not be exceeded (OSHA, 1992).
    1) Threshold limit values and permissible exposure limits are for use in the occupational setting, and are not applicable to the general population. These values may not protect all individuals due to variability in susceptibility and other factors (OSHA, 1992).
    C) CASE REPORTS
    1) INGESTION
    a) METHYLMERCURY: A single acute ingestion of 45 mg of methyl mercury resulted in whole blood levels of 1930 and 1007 nanograms/mL 2 and 24 hours after ingestion but did not result in symptoms of toxicity (Lund et al, 1984).
    b) ANTISEPTIC MATERIALS (Thimerosal, Merthiolate, Acetomeroctol, and Merbromin) can be absorbed and can cause symptoms. A 15-year-old female ingested 20 mL of 2% Merbromin and presented 17 hours post ingestion with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dizziness. Mercury blood levels two days post ingestion were 412.0 nmol/L. The patient recovered (Magarey, 1993).
    c) One source report survival by an adult after ingesting 5 grams of Thiomersal. The man presented at the hospital 1 hour after ingestion with nausea and vomiting. Hemorrhagic erosive gastritis, elevated blood mercury levels, tubular renal failure, CNS and peripheral neuropathy resembling Guillian-Barre developed during hospitalization. The patient's survival was tentatively attributed to spontaneous emesis which occurred 15 minutes after ingestion. Chelation and intensive supportive therapy were provided (Pfab et al, 1996).
    d) The maximum allowable contaminant level set by the EPA for mercury in drinking water is 2 ppb or 2 mcg/L. The FDA will allow up to 1 ppm of mercury in fish, and 2 ppb (2 mcg/L) in bottled drinking water. The WHO guideline for maximum drinking water concentration of mercury is 1 ppb or 1 mcg/L (US DHHS, 1992).
    2) INHALATION
    a) Some organic mercury compounds are volatile and will produce toxic vapors. Examples of these compounds include methyl mercury, dimethyl mercury, ethyl mercuric chloride (chloroethylmercury) and ethyl mercury phosphate. Inhalation of aerosols, dusts or particulates may also result in adverse effects.
    b) PHENYLMERCURIC ACETATE: A survey of 74 people living in 19 houses newly-painted with an interior latex paint containing phenylmercuric acetate (median=3.8 millimoles of mercury/liter) showed elevated mercury levels in the air (median=10 nanomoles/cubic meter; range of less than 0.5 to 49.9) and in the urine (median=4.7 nanomoles/millimole of creatinine; range of 1.4 to 66.5) (Agocs et al, 1990). There was no clinical information provided except for the mention of acrodynia in a 4-year-old boy.
    c) Alkyl mercury air concentrations which are considered by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) are 10 mg/m3 (US DHHS, 1990).
    1) IDLH VALUES are used strictly for the selection of respirator equipment in the industrial setting. IDLH concentrations represent the highest concentration from which a worker could escape within 30 minutes without a respirator, without experiencing impairment of escape or irreversible health effects.
    2) The IDLH value is much higher than the ACGIH recommended threshold limit value for alkyl mercury (TLV = 0.01 mg/m3 Time Weighted Average). Threshold limit values are airborne concentrations under which WORKERS may be repeatedly exposed on a daily basis without suffering adverse health effects (ACGIH, 1994).
    3) DERMAL
    a) DIMETHYLMERCURY: A 29-year-old man spilled 1 to 2 mL of dimethylmercury onto his nitrile double gloved hand. After the removal of his glove, 2 decontamination showers, and chelation therapy with succimer (initially 900 mg [10 mg/kg] twice daily and then 500 mg 3 times daily) on hospital day 1, he was discharged the next day. Laboratory results revealed a serum mercury concentration of 4 mcg/L. On a follow-up visit a week later, his neurologic exam was normal and his chelation therapy was switched to DMPS (600 mg 3 times daily; 6.82 mg/kg). At that time, his spot urine mercury was 11 mcg/g creatinine. On week 3, his 24-hour urine collection was 7 mcg/g creatinine. He never developed any symptoms and continued to take DMPS for 3 weeks. His chelation therapy was discontinued after his final serum mercury concentration reached 2 mcg/L (Salinger et al, 2015).
    4) OTHER
    a) ETHYL MERCURY: A 38-year-old woman with Guillain-Barre syndrome was accidentally exposed to high levels of thimerosal (ethyl mercury), a column disinfectant used during a protein A Immunoadsorption treatment. The single acute exposure due to equipment operational errors resulted in a maximum serum mercury level of 2.25 mcg/mL. Ten days after the exposure, chelation therapy was initiated with DMSA 600 mg three times daily for 30 days. The patient did not develop any short or long term clinical effects from the thimerosal exposure (Koch & Trapp, 2006).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) BLOOD MERCURY LEVELS IN THE US
    a) The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a daily intake reference dose of 0.1 mcg mercury/kg/day which corresponds to a blood mercury concentration of 5.8 mcg/L (ppb) and a hair mercury concentration of approximately 1 mcg/g (ppm). It is proposed that mercury concentration in hair collected close to the scalp at steady state is about 300 times higher than the mercury concentration at whole blood (Knobeloch et al, 2006).
    b) BACKGROUND - As of 2003, both the National Research Council (NRC) and the US Environmental Protection Agency have established a reference dose of 5.8 mcg/L mercury in cord blood, based on developmental effects from in utero methylmercury exposure. The benchmark dose is the lower 95% confidence limit of the estimated level that would result in a doubling of the proportion of children with an abnormal score on a developmental assessment tool (Schober et al, 2003).
    c) Based on data from the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (a population-based study), blood mercury levels were performed on 705 children ages 1 to 5 years, and 1705 women of childbearing age (16 to 49 years) to assess the distribution of blood mercury levels. The results indicated that approximately 8% of women had concentrations higher than the recommended reference dose of 5.8 mcg/L. Blood mercury levels were found to be 3 times higher in women than in children. The geometric mean concentration of total blood mercury was 0.34 mcg/L in children and 1.02 mcg/L in women. The geometric mean mercury levels were almost 4-fold higher among women who ate 3 or more servings of fish during a 30 day period, as compared to women who ate no fish (1.94 mcg/L vs 0.51 mcg/L; p less than .001). In this study, fish consumption had a positive influence on blood mercury levels in all race and ethnic groups. Although this study cannot be generalized to other populations (ie, different age groups or ethnic/racial backgrounds), the authors noted that the findings (in utero methylmercury exposure is low) were similar to rates found in the US population (National Research Council research) (Schober et al, 2003).
    d) FREQUENT FISH CONSUMPTION - In a case series of 10 adults and one child who ate frequent (up to 9 fish meals/week) meals of marine and freshwater fish, steady-state blood mercury concentrations ranged from less than 5 to 58 mcg/L and hair mercury concentrations ranged from 1 to 12 mcg/g. Three patients experienced vague subclinical symptoms such as confusion, sleep difficulty, balance problems, or visual disturbances (Knobeloch et al, 2006).
    2) MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS AND THIOMERSAL-CONTAINING VACCINES
    a) One study found very low concentrations of blood mercury in infants (aged 2 to 6 months) who received vaccines containing thiomersal. Forty full-term infants (20 aged 2 months and 20 aged 6 months) received thiomersal-containing vaccines and 21 infants received vaccines without thiomersal. Mean mercury doses (measured 3 to 27 days after vaccines) for thiomersal-exposed 2-month-olds and 6-month-olds were 45.6 mcg (range 37.5 to 62.5 mcg) and 111.3 mcg (range 87.5 to 175 mcg), respectively. Mean blood mercury concentrations in thiomersal-exposed 2-month-olds and 6-month-olds were 8.2 nmol/L (range 4.5 to 20.55 nmol/L) and 5.15 nmol/L (range 2.85 to 6.90 nmol/L), respectively. These concentrations did not exceed 29 nmol/L (ppb), which is the concentration thought to be safe in cord blood. One of the 15 blood samples in the control group had quantifiable mercury concentration (4.9 nmol/L). Overall, only a small number of urine samples had detectable mercury concentrations (1 of 12 in 2-month-olds and 3 of 15 in 6-months-olds), with a highest concentration of urinary mercury of 6.45 nmol/L in a 6-month-old infant in the thiomersal-exposed group. Mean stool mercury concentrations in thiomersal-exposed 2-month-old and 6-month-old infants were 81.8 nmol/L (range 23 to 141 nmol/L) and 58.3 nmol/L (range 29 to 102 nmol/L), respectively. The estimated half-life of mercury in blood after vaccination was 7 days (95% CI, range 4 to 10 days) with similar rate of elimination of thiomersal mercury from blood in both age-groups (Pichichero et al, 2002).
    3) CASE REPORTS
    a) A 48-year-old woman developed severe neurotoxicity 5 months after allegedly spilling several drops of dimethyl mercury on her hand while wearing protective gloves (Nierenberg et al, 1998). Whole blood mercury 5 months after exposure was 4,000 micrograms/liter (normal range 1 to 8, toxic >200 micrograms/liter) and urinary mercury was 234 micrograms/liter (normal range 1 to 5, toxic >50 micrograms/liter).
    4) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    a) ETHYLMERCURY - Blood mercury concentrations of 1.0 microgram per milliliter or greater may present a health risk, and concentrations greater than 2 micrograms per milliliter are associated with severe intoxication following ethylmercury exposures. Patients with serum concentrations of 0.14 to 0.65 micrograms per milliliter were reported to have no adverse effects of ethylmercury (Magos, 2001).
    b) MERCUROCHROME - Plasma mercury level of 1017 micrograms/liter was reported in a newborn following a one time application of 5% mercurochrome to an omphalocele birth defect. Chelation with DMSA was started with successive decrease in levels over several days (Bruzzini et al, 1999).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7439-97-6 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: BEI, Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    b) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    c) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    b) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: 200.59
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    c) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS and PNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    d) Under Study
    1) Mercury, alkyl compounds
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA:
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions: Not Listed
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s):
    d) Molecular Weight:
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    e) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.1 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7439-97-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: Hg Vapor: 0.05 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s): ,
    3) Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    4) REL:
    a) TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s):
    5) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 10 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
    b) Note(s): Not Listed
    6) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 2 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    2) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, as Hg
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    3) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg
    4) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds
    5) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg
    6) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): D ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental
    a) D : Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity.
    7) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 3 ; Listed as: Mercury and inorganic mercury compounds
    a) 3 : The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    8) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
    9) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    10) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury (metallic mercury and inorganic mercury compounds)
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    11) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury, organic compounds
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    12) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg)
    2) Table Z-1 for Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    3) Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    4) Table Z-1 for Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    5) Listed as: Mercury (vapor) (as Hg)
    6) Table Z-1 for Mercury (vapor) (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    7) Table Z-2 for Mercury (Z37.8-1971):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    b) Acceptable Ceiling Concentration: 1 mg/10m(3)
    c) Acceptable Maximum Peak above the Ceiling Concentration for an 8-hour Shift:
    1) Concentration:
    2) Maximum Duration:
    d) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    1) 44,300 mcg/m(3) for 8H (RTECS , 2001)
    2) 150 mcg/m(3) for 46D (RTECS , 2001)

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Short chain alkyl mercury compounds have a stable carbon-mercury bond which is slowly cleaved after absorption. The toxic effects of these chemicals is considered to be due to the intact molecule (Bryson, 1989).
    B) Aryl and alkoxyalkyl and aryl compounds have carbon-mercury bonds which are more readily cleaved in the body, with the subsequent release of ionic inorganic mercury. These compounds are toxicologically similar to inorganic mercury, but with greater absorption and distribution.
    C) Mercury ions bind to sulfhydryl groups and also have an affinity for phosphoryl, carboxyl, amide and amine groups. The structure and function of key proteins and enzymes may be disturbed, receptor affinities altered, and cellular metabolism impaired, among other effects. Nonspecific cell injury or death may result (Klassen, 1990; (Goyer, 1991).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Mercury is an extremely heavy, silver colored liquid (ITI, 1985).

Ph

    A) No information on the pH of mercury was found in available references at the time of this review.

Molecular Weight

    A) 200.59 (Budavari, 1996)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.2) BOVINE/CATTLE
    A) Organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts are more commonly associated with acute toxicity (mercury toxicosis) in animals than elemental mercury exposure. Ingestion of batteries which contain elemental mercury has been associated with mercury toxicosis in some animals (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    1) Clinical signs of mercury toxicosis (associated chiefly with organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts) may include stomatitis, salivation, hemorrhagic or necrotic enteritis, decreased appetite, weakness, and hematuria. Skin and hair changes may be noted. Severe neurological effects may also occur in cattle following organomercury exposure (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain may occur.
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain may occur.
    11.1.10) PORCINE/SWINE
    A) Organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts are more commonly associated with acute toxicity in animals than exposure to elemental mercury. Ingestion of batteries which contain elemental mercury has been associated with mercury toxicosis in some animals (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    1) Clinical signs of acute or subacute mercury toxicosis due principally to organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts include stomatitis, salivation, vomiting (in swine), hemorrhagic or necrotic enteritis, decreased appetite, weakness, and hematuria. White pigs may display erythema. Other skin and hair changes may be noted. Severe neurological effects have also been associated with organic mercury exposure in swine (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) Muscle incoordination, ataxia, hyperesthesia, tremor, seizures, and coma may occur in some animals. Unusual weight loss may occur as a result of diarrhea and anorexia.
    2) ACUTE SYNDROME - Acute syndrome is marked by gastrointestinal signs including vomiting and diarrhea which may lead to fluid and electrolyte losses (Beasley et al, 1990).
    3) CHRONIC SYNDROME - Chronic syndrome is more common, after exposure periods of several days or longer. Neurologic, GI, renal, and dermal effects are seen (Beasley et al, 1990).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    2) Begin treatment immediately.
    3) Keep animal warm.
    4) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    5) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    6) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Induce emesis with syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM, or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally. Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liter), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    b) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    B) SMALL ANIMALS
    1) Emesis or gastric lavage followed by activated charcoal, 20% sodium thiosulfate (0.5 to 3 g), egg white, or tannic acid (200 to 500 mg in 30 to 60 mL water).
    2) Dimercaprol (BAL) 3 mg/kg IM every 4 hours days 1 and 2, four times daily on day 3, followed by twice daily on days 4 through 10. d-Penicillamine 11 mg/kg four times daily for 7 to 10 days, orally.
    C) LARGE ANIMALS
    1) Adsorbant - Dimercaprol (BAL): 3 mg/kg IM. Repeat every 4 hours for 2 days, then four times daily on 3rd day, then twice daily for 10 days until recovery. Supportive fluid and electrolyte therapy.

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) GENERAL
    1) ALKYL MERCURIC COMPOUNDS - Methyl and ethyl mercury are the most toxic forms of mercury. All forms of mercury sequestered in living organisms are converted by anaerobic bacteria into methyl mercury. This is also the form of mercury found in eggs as residue, regardless of the form of mercury ingested by the bird (Beasley et al, 1990).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    2) Begin treatment immediately.
    3) Keep animal warm.
    4) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    5) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    6) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Induce emesis with syrup of Ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM, or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally. Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liter), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    b) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) Inorganic mercury is well-absorbed from the lungs, but only 7 to 15% is absorbed through the skin and GI tract. Mercury salts can also bind to gut mucosa (Beasley et al, 1990).
    2) Organic mercurials are absorbed via all routes, including dermal (Beasley et al, 1990).

Sources

    A) GENERAL
    1) Inorganic and organic mercurials are frequently found in manufactured products such as anti-fouling paints used on boat bottoms, batteries, and fungicides. Sewage sludge may contain mercury. The primary environmental form of mercury is methyl mercury, produced by anaerobic bacteria inside and outside of living organisms (Beasley et al, 1990).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    5) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    6) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    9) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    10) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    11) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    12) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Vol 1, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1994.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) Aaseth J & Friedheim EAH: Treatmetn of methylmercury poisoning in mice with 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid and other complexing thiols. Acta Phamacol et Toxicol 1978; 42:248-252.
    15) Abdelmegid L, Salem E, & Elsadik Y: A study on some biochemical renal parameters in workers exposed to elemental mercury vapors (abstract). Vet hum Toxicol 1993; 35:355.
    16) Aberer W, Gersiner G, & Pehamberger H: Ammoniated mercury ointment: outdated but still in use. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23:168-171.
    17) Adams CR, Ziegler DK, & Lin JT: Mercury intoxication stimulating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA 1983; 250:642-643.
    18) Addiego JE, Ridgway D, & Bleyer WA: The acute management of intrathecal methotrexate overdose: pharmacologic rationale and guidelines. J Pediatr 1981; 98(5):825-828.
    19) Agocs MM, Etzel RA, & Parrish G: Mercury exposure from interior latex paint. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1096-1101.
    20) Al-Saleh I, Abduljabbar M, Al-Rouqi R, et al: Mercury (Hg) exposure in breast-fed infants and their mothers and the evidence of oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013; 153(1-3):145-154.
    21) Al-Shahristani H & Shihab KM: Variation of biological half-life of methylmercury in man. Arch Environ Health 1974; 28:342-344.
    22) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    23) Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA, & Clarkson TW: Methylmercury poisoning in Iraqi children: clinical observations over two years. Br Med J 1978; 1:613-616.
    24) Anon: Cutis laxa and other congenital defects with penicillamine, ADR Highlights (Division of drug experience), Rockville, MD, 1981, pp 1-4-81-21.
    25) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    26) Arbeitsgruppe BGVV: Allgemeine und spezielle Massnahmen bei Vergiftungen und bei Drogennotfaellen. Empfehlungen der Kommission "Erkennung und Behandlung von Vergiftungen", Bundesinstituts fuer gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinaermedizin, Berlin, Germany, 1996.
    27) Aschner M: Mercury toxicity (letter). J Pediatr 2001; 138:450-451.
    28) Bakir F, Al-Khaldi A, & Clarkson TW: Clinical observations on treatment of alkylmercury poisoning in hospital patients. Bull WHO 1976; 53 (suppl):87-92.
    29) Bakir F, Damluji SF, & Amin-Zaki L: Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 1973; 181:230-241.
    30) Bakir F, Rustam H, & Tikriti S: Clinical and epidemiological aspects of methylmercury poisoning. Postgrad Med J 1980; 56:1-10.
    31) Ballatori N, Lieberman MW, & Wang W: N-Acetylcysteine as an antidote in methylmercury poisoning. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106:267-271.
    32) Barker HM, Lindberg HA, & Thomas ME: Sudden death and mercurial diuretics. JAMA 1942; 119:1001-1003.
    33) Barregard L: Biological monitoring of exposure to mercury vapor. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 1:45-9.
    34) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    35) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    36) Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A Systems Affected Approach to Veterinary Toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1990.
    37) Beck RB, Rosenbaum KN, & Byers PH: Ultrastructural findings in fetal penicillamine syndrome, 14th March of Dimes Ann Birth Defects Conf, San Diego, CA, 1981.
    38) Bell CL & Graziano FM: The safety of administration of penicillamine to penicillin-sensitive individuals. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26:801-803.
    39) Berlin M & Rylander: Increased brain uptake of mercury induced by 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL) in mice exposed to phenylmercuric acetate. Acta Phamacol Toxicol 1964; 22:236-240.
    40) Berlin M, Jerksell LG, & Nordberg G: Accellerated uptake of meercury by brain caused by 2,3-dimpercaptopropanol (BAL) after injection into the mouse of a methylmercuric compound. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1965; 23:312-320.
    41) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    42) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    43) Blaney SM, Poplack DG, Godwin K, et al: Effect of body position on ventricular CSF methotrexate concentration following intralumbar administration. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(1):177-179.
    44) Blanusa M, Varnai VM, Piasek M, et al: Chelators as antidotes of metal toxicity: therapeutic and experimental aspects. Curr Med Chem 2005; 12(23):2771-2794.
    45) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    46) Brown G, Friedfeld L, & Kissin M: Deaths immediately following the intravenous administration of mercupurin. JAMA 1942; 119:1004.
    47) Bruzzini D, Cullen N, & Henretig F: Mercury poisoning of a neonate with major omphalocele (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:623.
    48) Bryan A & Krenzelok EP: Mercuochrome toxicity? a review of 2250 exposures (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:632.
    49) Bryson PD: Comprehensive review in toxicology, 2nd ed, Aspen Publishers, Inc, Denver, CO, 1989, pp 477-486.
    50) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    51) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th edition, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996a.
    52) Buettner C: Mercury and the risk of myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2152-2153.
    53) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    54) CDC: Mercury exposure from interior latex paint--Michigan. CDC: MMWR 1990; 39:125-126.
    55) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1985; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    56) Calder IM, Kelman GR, & Mason H: Diurnal variations in urinary mercury excretion. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3:463-467.
    57) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    58) Caravati EM: D-Penicillamine. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    59) Carta P, Flore C, Alinovi R, et al: Sub-clinical neurobehavioral abnormalities associated with low level of mercury exposure through fish consumption. Neuro Toxicol 2003; 24:617-623.
    60) Carvajal HF & Stewart CE: Emergency management of burn patients: the first few hours. Emerg Med Reports 1987; 8:129-136.
    61) Chapman LJ, Sauter SL, & Henning RA: Differences in frequency of finger tremor in otherwise asymptomatic mercury workers. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:838-843.
    62) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    63) Cherian MG: Arch Environ Health 1978; 33:109-114.
    64) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    65) Cinca I, Dumitrescu I, & Serbanescu PA: Accidental ethyl mercury poisoning with nervous system, skeletal muscle, and myocardium injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979; 43:143-149.
    66) Clarkson TW, Magos L, & Cox C: Tests of efficacy of antidotes for removal of methylmercury in human poisoning during the Iraq outbreak. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1981; 218(1):74-83.
    67) Clarkson TW: Mercury - an element of mystery (editorial). N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1137-1138.
    68) Clausen J: Mercury and multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1993; 87:461-464.
    69) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    70) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    71) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    72) Dantzig PI: A new cutaneous sign of mercury poisoning . Ann Intern Med 2003; 139(1):78-80.
    73) Davidson PW, Myers GJ, & Cox C: Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment. JAMA 1998; 280:701-707.
    74) Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, et al: Methylmercury and neurodevelopment: longitudinal analysis of the Seychelles child development cohort. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2006; 28(5):529-535.
    75) Davis LE, Kornfeld M, & Mooney HS: Methylmercury poisoning: long-term clinical, radiological, toxicological, and pathological studies of an affected family. Ann Neurol 1994; 35:680-688.
    76) DeGraff AC & Nadler JE: A Review of the toxic manifestations of mercurial diuretics in man. JAMA 1942; 119:1006-1011.
    77) Debray P, Besson-Leaud M, & Lavaud J: Intoxication aigue par le mercure chez L'enfant: a propos de quatre observations [Acute mercury poisoning in children: 4 cases]. (Translated from French by Alan H. Hall). Ann Pediatr 1979; 26:531-537.
    78) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    79) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    80) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    81) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    82) Ehrenfeld JR, Ong J, & Farino W: Controlling volatile emissions at hazardous waste sites, Noyes Publication, Park Ridge, NJ, 1986, pp 393-401.
    83) Ellingsen DG, Andersen A, & Nordhagen HP: Incidence of cancer and mortality among workers exposed to mercury vapour in the Norwegian chloralkali industry. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50(10):875-880.
    84) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    85) Eto K , Tokunaga H , Nagashima K , et al: An autopsy case of minamata disease (methylmercury poisoning)--pathological viewpoints of peripheral nerves. Toxicol Pathol 2002; 30(6):714-722.
    86) Eto K, Takizawa Y, & Akagi H: Differential diagnosis between organic and inorganic mercury poisoning in human cases - the pathologic point of view. Toxicol Pathol 1999; 27:664-671.
    87) FDA: Mercury toxicity in ear irrigation. FDA: FDA Drug Bull 1983; 13:5-6.
    88) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    89) FOLKL H & KONIG P: WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR 1983; 95:580-584.
    90) Fagan DG, Pritchard JS, & Clarkson TW: Organ mercury levels in infants with omphaloceles terated with organic mercurial antiseptic. Arch Dis Child 1977; 52:962-964.
    91) Feehally J, Wheeler DC, Mackay EH, et al: Recurrent acute renal failure with interstitial nephritis due to D-penicillamine. Renal Failure 1987; 10:55-57.
    92) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.
    93) Franchi E, Loprieno G, & Ballardin M: Cytogenetic monitoring of fishermen with environmental mercury exposure. Mutat Res 1994; 320:23-29.
    94) Friberg L & Elinder C: Biological monitoring of toxic metals. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19(suppl 1):7-13.
    95) Gledhill RF & Hopkins AP: Chronic inorganic mercury poisoning treated with N-acetyl-D-penicillamine. Brit J Industr Med 1972; 29:225-228.
    96) Goldwater LJ, Ladd AC, & Berkhout PG: Acute exposure to phenylmercuric acetate. J Occ Med 1964; 6:227-228.
    97) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    98) Gosselin RE, Smith RP, & Hodge HC: Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1984, pp II-4;II-136;II-138;III-265-III-266.
    99) Gosselin S & Isbister GK: Re: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(8):609-610.
    100) Goyer RA: Toxic effects of metals. In: MO Amdur, J Doull & CD Klaassen (Eds): Casarett and Doull's Toxicology, 4th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991.
    101) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    102) Grandjean P, Jorgensen PJ, & Weihe P: Human milk as a source of methylmercury exposure in infants. Environ Health Perspec 1994; 102:74-77.
    103) Grandjean P, Murata K, Budtz-Jorgensen E, et al: Cardiac autonomic activity in methylmercury neurotoxicity: 14-year follow-up of a faroese birth cohort. J Pediatr 2004; 144:169-176.
    104) Grandjean P, Weihe P, & White RF: Milestone development in infants exposed to methylmercury from human milk. NeuroToxicololgy 1995; 16:27-34.
    105) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    106) Graziano JH, Cuccia D, & Friedheim E: Potential usefulness of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid for the treatment of arsenic poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 207:1051-1055.
    107) Graziano JH, Siris ES, & Lolacono N: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid as an antidote for lead intoxication. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985; 37:432-438.
    108) Graziano JH: Role of 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning. Med Toxicol 1986; 1:155-162.
    109) Guallar E, Sanz-Gallardo I, Veer PV, et al: Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1747-1753.
    110) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    111) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1992; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    112) Hamada R, Yoshida Y, & Nomoto M: Computed tomography in fetal methylmercury poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:101-106.
    113) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    114) Haynes BW Jr: Emergency department management of minor burns. Top Emerg Med 1981; 3:35-40.
    115) Hla KK, Ashton CE, & Henry JA: Adverse effects from 2,3-dimercaptopropane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 13.
    116) Hryhorczuk DO, Meyers L, & Chen G: Treatment of mercury intoxication in a dentist with N-acetyl-D, L-penicillamine. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:401-408.
    117) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    118) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    119) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    120) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    121) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    122) IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in the Glass Manufacturing Industry, Volume 58, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993, pp 239-288.
    123) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    124) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    125) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1985, pp 313-315.
    126) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    127) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    128) Ishihara N, Shiojima S, & Suzuki T: Selective enhancement of urinary organic mercury excretion by D-penicillamine. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:245-249.
    129) Itai Y, Fujino T, Ueno K, et al: An epidemiological study of the incidence of abnormal pregnancy in areas heavily contaminated with methylmercury. Environ Sci 2004; 11:83-97.
    130) Jedrychowski W, Jankowski J, Flak E, et al: Effects of prenatal exposure to mercury on cognitive and psychomotor function in one-year-old infants: epidemiologic cohort study in Poland. Ann Epidemiol 2006; 16(6):439-447.
    131) Jensen TK, Grandjean P, Jorgensen EB, et al: Effects of breast feeding on neuropsychological development in a community with methylmercury exposure from seafood. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2005; 15:423-430.
    132) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    133) Kark RAP, Poskanzer DC, & Bullock JD: Mercury poisoning and its treatment with N-acetyl-d,l-penicillamine. N Engl J Med 1971; 285:10-16.
    134) Kay A: European league against rheumatism study of adverse reactions to D-penicillamine. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25:193-198.
    135) Kershaw TG, Dhahir PH, & Clarkson TW: The relationship between blood levels and dose of methylmercury in man. Arch Environ Health 1980; 35:28-35.
    136) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    137) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    138) Klaassen KD: Heavy metals and heavy metal antagonists. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS et al (Eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 1598-1602.
    139) Knight AL: Mercury and its compounds. In: Zenz C (Ed): Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chicago, IL, 1988, pp 590-596.
    140) Knobeloch L, Steenport D, Schrank C, et al: Methylmercury exposure in Wisconsin: A case study series. Environ Res 2006; 101(1):113-122.
    141) Koby GA: Phenylmercuric acetate as primary irritant (letter). Arch Dermatol 1972; 106:129.
    142) Koch M & Trapp R: Ethyl mercury poisoning during a protein a immunoadsorption treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47(2):e31-e34.
    143) Korogi Y, Takahashi M, & Okajima T: MR findings of Minamata disease - organic mercury poisoning. JMRI 1998; 8:308-316.
    144) Kosnett M, Dutra C, & Osterloh J: Nephrotoxicity from elemental mercury: protective effects of dimercaptosuccinic acid (abstract 85). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:351.
    145) Kostyniak PJ, Clarkson TW, & Abbasi AH: An extracorporeal complexing hemodialysis system for the treatment of methylmercury poisoning. II in vivo applications in the dog. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeutics 1977; 203:253-263.
    146) Kostyniak PJ: Methylmercury removal in the dog during infusion of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). J Toxicol Environ Health 1983; 11:947-957.
    147) Kostyniak PJ: Mobilization and removal or methylmercury in the dog during extraqcorporeal complexing hemodialysis with 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). J Pharmacol Exp Therapeutics 1982; 221:63-68.
    148) Kuntzelman DR & Angle CR: Abnormal liver function in childhood lead poisoning unaffected by DMSA (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:355.
    149) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    150) Langford NJ & Ferner RE: Toxicity of mercury (review). J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13:651-656.
    151) Langworth S, Almkvist O, & Soderman E: Effects of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the central nervous system. Br J Ind Med 1992; 29:545-555.
    152) Lee CH , Lin RH , Liu SH , et al: Distinct genotoxicity of phenylmercury acetate in human lymphocytes as compared with other mercury compounds. Mutat Res 1997; 392(3):269-276.
    153) Levin M, Jacobs J, & Polos PG: Acute mercury poisoning and mercurial pneumonitis from gold ore purification. Chest 1988; 94:554-556.
    154) Liang L, Bloom NS, & Horvat M: Simultaneous determination of mercury speciation in biological materials by GC/cvafs after ethylation and room-temperature precollection. Clin Chem 1994; 40:602-607.
    155) Liang Y, Sun R, & Sun Y: Psychological effects of low exposure to mercury vapor: application of a computer-administered neurobehavioral evaluation system. Environ Res 1993; 60:320-327.
    156) Linares A, Zarranz JJ, & Rodrigues-Alarcon J: Reversible cutis laxa due to maternal d-penicillamine treatment. Lancet 1979; 2:43.
    157) Lund ME, Clarkson TW, & Berlin M: Treatment of acute methylmercury ingestion by hemodialysis with N-acetylcysteine infusion and 2-3,dimercaptopropane sulfonate. Clin Tox 1984; 22:31-49.
    158) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    159) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    160) Magarey JA: Absorption of mercurochrome (letter). Lancet 1993; 342:1424.
    161) Magos L, Peristianis GC, & Snowden RT: Postexposure preventive treatment of methylmercury intoxication in rats with dimercaptosuccinic acid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978; 45:463-475.
    162) Magos L: Review on the toxicity of ethylmercury, including its presence as a preservative in biological and pharmaceutical products. J Appl Toxicol 2001; 21:1-5.
    163) Maibach H: Acute laryngeal obstruction presumed secondary to thiomersal (merthiolate) delayed hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1:221-222.
    164) Manahan SE: Toxicological Chemistry, Lewis Publishers, Inc, Chelsea, MI, 1991, pp 103-105;132-133.
    165) Manfroi CB, Schwalm FD, Cereser V, et al: Maternal milk as methylmercury source for suckling mice: neurotoxic effects involved with the cerebellar glutamatergic system. Toxicological Sci 2004; 81:172-178.
    166) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    167) Marcus S, Okose P, & Jennis T: Untoward effects of oral dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment for lead poisoning (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:376.
    168) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    169) Marsh DO, Clarkson TW, & Cox C: Fetal methylmercury poisoning. Relationship between concentration in single strands of maternal hair and child effects. Arch Neurol 1987; 44:1017-1022.
    170) Matheson DS, Clarkson TW, & Gelfand EW: Mercury toxicity (acrodynia) induced by long-term injection of gammaglobulin. J Pediatrics 1980; 97:153-55.
    171) McKeown-Eyssen GE, Ruedy J, & Neims A: Methyl mercury exposure in northern Quebec II. Neurologic findings in children. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118:470-479.
    172) McLauchlan GA: Acute mercury poisoning. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:110-112.
    173) Meggs WJ & Hoffman RS: Fatality resulting from intraventricular vincristine administration. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36(3):243-246.
    174) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    175) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    176) Morris GE: Dermatoses from phenylmercuric salts. Arch Environ Health 1960; 1:53-55.
    177) Moylan JA: Burn care after thermal injury. Top Emerg Med 1980; 2:39-52.
    178) Murata K, Weihe P, Budtz-Jorgensen E, et al: Delayed brainstem auditory evoked potential latencies in 14-year-old children exposed to methylmercury. J Pediatr 2004; 144:177-183.
    179) Musiek FE & Hanlon DP: Neuroaudiological effects in a case of fatal dimethylmercury poisoning. Ear & Hearing 1999; 20:271-275.
    180) Mutter J & Naumann J: Mercury and the risk of myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2152.
    181) Myers GJ & Davidson PW: Does methylmercury have a role in causing developmental disabilities in children?. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108(Suppl 3):413-420.
    182) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    183) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    184) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    185) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    186) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    187) Nagi NA & Yassin AK: Organic mercury poisoning in children. J Trop Med Hyg 1974; 77:128-132.
    188) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    189) Nascimento LOT, Filho GL, & Rocha AD: Intoxicacao letal por mercurio atraves da ingestao de "merthiolate". Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med S Paulo (translated from Spanish by Katherine M Hurlbut) 1990; 45:216-218.
    190) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    234) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    235) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    236) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    237) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    238) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    239) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    240) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    241) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    242) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    243) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    244) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    245) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    246) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    247) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    248) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    249) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    250) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    251) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    252) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    253) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    254) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    255) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    256) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    257) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    258) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    259) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    260) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    261) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    262) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    263) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    264) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    265) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    266) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    267) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    268) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    269) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    270) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    271) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    272) Nelson LS: Copper. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1256-1265.
    273) Nierenberg DW, Nordgren RE, & Chang MB: Delayed cerebellar disease and death after accidental exposure to dimethylmercury. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1672-1676.
    274) Ninomiya T, Imamura K, Kuwahata M, et al: Reappraisal of somatosensory disorders in methylmercury poisoning. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2005; 27:643-653.
    275) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    276) Nordberg GF & Skerfving S: Metabolism. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 29-91.
    277) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    278) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    279) O'Carroll RE, Masterton G, & Dougall N: The neuropsychiatric sequelae of mercury poisoning: the mad hatter's disease revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 167:95-98.
    280) O'Marcaigh AS, Johnson CM, & Smithson WA: Successful treatment of intrathecal methotrexate overdose by using ventriculolumbar perfusion and trathecal instillation of carboxypeptidase G2. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71:161-165.
    281) OSHA: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 29 CFR Part 1910; Air Contaminants; Final Rule, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, 1992.
    282) Obel N, Hansen B, & Christensen MM: Methyl mercury, mercuric chloride, and silver lactate decrease superoxide anion formation and chemotaxis in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol 1993; 12:361-364.
    283) Osweiler GD & Hook BS: Mercury. In: JL Howard (Ed.): Current Veterinary Therapy: Food Animal Practice 2, W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp 440-442.
    284) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    285) Pfab R, Muckter H, & Roider G: Clinical course of severe poisoning with Thiomersal. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:453-460.
    286) Pichichero ME , Cernichiari E , Lopreiato J , et al: Mercury concentrations and metabolism in infants receiving vaccines containing thiomersal: a descriptive study. Lancet 2002; 360(9347):1737-1741.
    287) Pierce PE, Thompson JF, & Likosky WH: Alkyl Mercury poisoning in humnas, report of an outbreak. JAMA 1972; 220:1439-1442.
    288) Pineau A, Piron M, & Boiteau HL: Determination of total mercury in human hair samples by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 1990; 14:235-238.
    289) Plante M & Babo S: Mercury and the risk of myocardial infarction (letter). N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2151-2152.
    290) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    291) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    292) Proctor NH, Hughes JP, & Fischman ML: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 2nd ed, JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1989, pp 308-310.
    293) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Ovation Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Deerfield, IL, 2005.
    294) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Lundbeck Inc. (per Manufacturer), Deerfield, IL, 2011.
    295) Product Information: CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, penicillamine oral capsules. Merck & Co,Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2004.
    296) Product Information: DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, penicillamine titratable oral tablets. Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Somerset, NJ, 2009.
    297) Product Information: DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, (RS)-2,3-bis(sulphanyl)propane-1-sulphonic acid, sodium salt-monohydrate oral capsules. Heyl Chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH & Co., 2004.
    298) Product Information: Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)propane-1-sulfonic acid intravenous intramuscular injection solution. Heyl Chem.-pharm. Fabrik (per manufacturer), Berlin, Germany, 2013.
    299) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires July/31/2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    300) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    301) Risher JF: Too much of a good thing (fish): methylmercury case study. J Environ Health 2004; 67:9-14.
    302) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    303) Roberts JR: Minor burns (Pt II). Emerg Med Ambulatory Care News 1988; 10:4-5.
    304) Robillard JE, Rames LK, & Jenson RL: Peritoneal dialysis in mercurial diuretic intoxication. J Pediatr 1976; 88:79-81.
    305) Robledo MA: Chronic methyl mercury poisoning may trigger endemic pemphigus foliaceus "fogo selvagem". Med Hypotheses 2012; 78(1):60-66.
    306) Rohyans J, Walson PD, & Wood GA: Mercury toxicity following merthiolate ear irrigations. J Pediatr 1984; 104:311-313.
    307) Rosa FW: Teratogen update: penicillamine. Teratology 1986; 33:127-131.
    308) Rosenmann KD, Valciukas JA, & Glickman L: Sensitive indicators of inorganic mercury toxicity. Arch Environ Health 1986; 41:208-215.
    309) Ruha AM, Curry SC, Gerkin RD, et al: Urine mercury excretion following meso-dimercaptosuccinic acid challenge in fish eaters. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133(1):87-92.
    310) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    311) Salinger LM, Brass R, Bayer MJ, et al: Not Just Another Day in the Lab: A Dimethyl Mercury Exposure. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):742-743.
    312) Sallsten G, Barregard L, & Wikkelso C: Mercury and proteins in cerebrospinal fluid in subjects exposed to mercury vapor. Environ Res 1994; 65:195-206.
    313) Sauder P, Livardjani F, & Jaeger A: Acute mercury chloride intoxication: effects of hemodialysis and plasma exchange on mercury kinetics. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:189-197.
    314) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, NY, 1987a.
    315) Sax NI & Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1987, pp 745-746.
    316) Schober SE, Sinks TH, Jones RL, et al: Blood mercury levels in US children and women of childbearing age, 1999-2000. JAMA 2003; 289:1667-1674.
    317) Schroeder HA & Mitchener M: Life-term effects of mercury, methyl mercury, and nine other trace metals on mice. J Nutr 1975; 105:452-458.
    318) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    319) Shahristani H & Shihab K: Variation of biological half-life of methylmercury in man. Arch Environ Health 1974; 28:342-344.
    320) Sherlock J, Hislop J, & Newton D: Elevation of mercury in human blood from controlled chronic ingestion of methylmercury in fish. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3:117-131.
    321) Siegler RW, Nierenberg DW, & Hickey WF: Fatal poisoning from liquid dimethylmercury: a neuropathologic study. Hum Pathol 1999; 30:720-723.
    322) Singer R, Valciukas JA, & Rosenman KD: Peripheral neurotoxicity in workers exposed to inorganic mercury compounds. Arch Environ Health 1987; 42:181-184.
    323) Skerfving S & Vostal J: Symptoms and signs of intoxication. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 93-107.
    324) Smith JC, Allen PV, & Turner MD: The kinetics of intravenously administered methyl mercury in man. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 128:251-256.
    325) Smith PJ: Br J Ind Med 1983; 40:413-419.
    326) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    327) Snodgrass W, Sullivan JB, & Rumack B: Mercury poisoning from home gold ore processing. JAMA 1981; 246:1929-1931.
    328) Soleo L, Urbano ML, & Petrera V: Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on psychological performance. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:105-109.
    329) Solomon L, Abrams G, & Dinner M: Neonatal abnormalities associated with d-penicillamine treatment during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:54.
    330) Stajich GV , Lopez GP , Harry SW , et al: Iatrogenic exposure to mercury after hepatitis B vaccination in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2000; 136(5):679-681.
    331) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    332) Stark AM, Barth H, Grabner JP, et al: Accidental intrathecal mercury application. Eur Spine J 2004; 13:241-243.
    333) Steuerwald U , Weihe P , Jorgensen PJ , et al: Maternal seafood diet, methylmercury exposure, and neonatal neurologic function. J Pediatr 2000; 136(5):599-605.
    334) Sue Y: Mercury. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (EDS): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 5th ed, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1994, pp 1051-1062.
    335) Takaoka S , Kawakami Y , Fujino T , et al: Somatosensory disturbance by methylmercury exposure. Environ Res 2008; 107(1):6-19.
    336) Taylor W, Guirgis HA, & Stewart WK: Investigation of a population exposed to organomercurial seed dressing. Arch Environ Health 1969; 19:505-509.
    337) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    338) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    339) Toribara TY, Jackson DA, & French WR: Nondestructive x-ray fluorescence spectrometry for determination of trace elements along a single strand of hair. Anal Chem 1982; 54:1844-1849.
    340) Torres JLC & De Corres F: Anaphylactic hypersensitivity to mercurochrome (merbrominum). Ann Allergy 1985; 54:230-232.
    341) Torresani C, Carprari E, & Manara GC: Contact urticaria syndrome due to phenylmercuric acetate. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29:282-283.
    342) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    343) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    344) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    345) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    346) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    347) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    348) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    349) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    350) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Mercury compounds. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/mercury.html. As accessed 2011-05-03.
    351) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    352) U.S. Geological Survey: Toxic substances hydrology program: Methylmercury. U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA. 2010. Available from URL: http://toxics.usgs.gov/definitions/methylmercury.html. As accessed 2011-05-03.
    353) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    354) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    355) US DHHS: Mercury Toxicity, Monograph 17. ATSDR Case Studies in Environmental Medicine, 1992.
    356) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    357) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    358) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    359) Verpooten GF, Nuyts GD, & Hoylaerts MF: Immunoassay in urine of a specific marker for proximal tubular S3 segment. Clin Chem 1992; 38:642-647.
    360) Weil M, Bressler J, Parsons P, et al: Blood mercury levels and neurobehavioral function. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 293:1875-1882.
    361) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    362) Widemann BC, Balis FM, Shalabi A, et al: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose with intrathecal carboxypeptidase G2. J Nat Cancer Inst 2004; 96(20):1557-1559.
    363) Wilson LA, McNatt J, & Reitschel R: Delayed hypersensitivity to thimerosal in soft contact lens wearers. Ophthalmology 1981; 88:804-809.
    364) Winfield SA, Boyd ND, & Vimy MJ: Measurement of total mercury in biological specimens by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Clin Chem 1994; 40:206-210.
    365) Winship KA: Toxicity of mercury and its inorganic salts. Adv Drug React 1985; 3:129-160.
    366) Winstanley R, Patel I, & Fischer E: The determination of toxic metals in simulated stomach contents by energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis and a fatal case of mercury poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 1987; 35:181-187.
    367) Woods JS, Martin MD, & Naleway CA: Urinary porphyrin profiles as a biomarker of mercury exposure: studies on dentists with occupational exposure to mercury vapor. J Toxicol Environ Health 1993; 235-246.
    368) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    369) Xue F , Holzman C , Rahbar MH , et al: Maternal fish consumption, mercury levels, and risk of preterm delivery. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115(1):42-47.
    370) Yeates KO & Mortensen ME: Acute and chronic neuropsychological consequences of mercury vapor poisoning in two early adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994; 16:209-222.
    371) Yeh TF, Pildes RS, & Firor HV: Mercury poisoning from mercurochrome therapy of an infected omphalocele. Clin Toxicol 1978; 12:463-467.
    372) Yokoo EM, Valente JG, Grattan L, et al: Low level methylmercury exposure affects neuropsychological function in adults. Environ Health 2003; 2:8.
    373) Yoshizawa K, Rimm EB, Morris JS, et al: Mercury and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(22):1755-1760.
    374) Zhang J: Clinical observations in ethyl mercury chloride poisoning. Am J Ind Med 1984; 5:251-258.
    375) Zimmer L & Carter DE: Effects of complexing treatment administered with the onset of methyl mercury neurotoxic signs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 51:29-38.