MERCURY, INORGANIC

Editor's Note: This material is not listed in the Emergency Response Guidebook. Based on the material's physical and chemical properties, toxicity, or chemical group, a guide has been assigned. For additional technical information, contact one of the emergency response telephone numbers listed under Public Safety Measures.

MOLECULAR FORMULA

ERG GUIDE NUMBER

151-SUBSTANCES - TOXIC (NON-COMBUSTIBLE)

USES/FORMS/SOURCES

USES

Common mercury salts include mercury II (mercuric) chloride (corrosive sublimate), mercury I (mercurous) chloride (calomel), mercury II oxide, mercury II iodide, and mercury II sulfide (cinnabar). Mercuric chloride is used as a disinfectant and pesticide. In the past, inorganic mercury compounds were used as diuretics, antibacterials, antiseptics, ointments, laxatives, and antisyphilitic agents. Most of these products have now been discontinued (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007; Klaassen, 1990; US DHHS, 1992).
SKIN-WHITENING CREAM

Mercury-containing skin products are available in many developing countries (Chakera et al, 2011; Soo et al, 2003; Chan et al, 2001; Palmer et al, 2000). In one study, mercury content in unlabeled skin-lightening creams from Mexico ranged from 2% to 5.7% by weight (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012).
MERCURY CONCENTRATION IN CREAM

In one study, 8 of 38 brands of cosmetic cream purchased from Hong Kong and China had mercury contents exceeding 1 mcg/g, the recommended limit of the US Food and Drug Administration. In one case, the mercury content of an antifreckle cosmetic cream was 6.5% w/w (Chan et al, 2001).
A woman developed nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous nephropathy after using a skin-whitening cream containing mercury (mercury concentration 1,762 ppm, almost 2000 times above the allowable limit) for 5 years (Soo et al, 2003).
A woman developed nephrotic syndrome after using a mercury-containing facial cream (mercury concentrations of 30,000 ppm, reference level, less than 1 ppm) once daily for the past 4 month (Tang et al, 2006).
Four patients developed minimal change disease after chronic exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Analysis of the facial creams revealed mercury content of 7420 to 30,000 ppm (Tang et al, 2013).

STOOL FIXATIVE

Mercury poisoning due to ingestion of stool fixative containing 4.5% of mercuric chloride (675 mg) and 5% of polyvinyl alcohol has been reported (Singer et al, 1994).

FORMS

Inorganic mercury exists in three oxidation states, as metallic (0), mercuric (+2), and as mercurous ions (Hg2+) which are usually dimers (IARC, 1993). Most of the inorganic mercury salts are crystals, granules or powders, which may be incorporated into other preparations.
CHINESE HERBAL DRUGS: Chinese herbal patient medications are sold OTC, labeled in Chinese, and not regulated by the FDA. Two common mercury compounds found in these products are cinnabar (red mercuric sulfide) and calomel (mercurous chloride). Product names reported to result in mercury poisoning include Tse Koo Choy, Qing Fen, Zhu-Sha, and Chen-Fen (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992).

-CLINICAL EFFECTS

GENERAL CLINICAL EFFECTS

USES: Common mercury salts include mercury II (mercuric) chloride (corrosive sublimate), mercury I (mercurous) chloride (calomel), mercury II oxide, mercury II iodide, and mercury II sulfide (cinnabar). Mercuric chloride is used as a disinfectant and pesticide. In the past, inorganic mercury compounds were used as diuretics, antibacterials, antiseptics, ointments, laxatives, and antisyphilitic agents. Most of these products have now been discontinued. Mercury poisoning due to ingestion of stool fixative containing 4.5% of mercuric chloride (675 mg) and 5% of polyvinyl alcohol has been reported. Skin lightening creams from Asia and Latin America and some Chinese herbal medicines have been found to contain inorganic mercury.

PHARMACOLOGY: Inorganic mercurials have antiseptic properties though they are no longer formulated for therapeutic use.

TOXICOLOGY: Inorganic mercury causes caustic injury to the gastrointestinal tract and kidney tubules due to direct oxidative effects of mercury salts. Mercury ions bind to sulfhydryl groups and also have an affinity for phosphoryl, carboxyl, amide, and amine groups. The structure and function of key proteins and enzymes are disturbed, receptor affinities altered, and cellular metabolism impaired, among other effects. Mercury II chloride is considered more toxic that mercury I chloride.

EPIDEMIOLOGY: Inorganic mercury exposure is uncommon and acute toxicity is rare.

WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE

MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are likely to be the first symptoms of acute inorganic mercury salt ingestion. Oropharyngeal burns may occur. Renal insufficiency may occur within 24 hours of exposure.
SEVERE TOXICITY: GASTROINTESTINAL: Hemorrhagic gastroenteritis may occur due to the caustic effects of inorganic mercury salts on the gastrointestinal mucosa. Grayish discoloration of the mucosa and metallic taste may accompany caustic effects in the oropharynx. Massive fluid losses due to vomiting and diarrhea toxicity may lead to hypotension and shock over the first several days of poisoning. RENAL: In addition to caustic gastrointestinal effects, renal injury is the primary toxicity of inorganic mercury exposure. Acute tubular necrosis due to the oxidative effects of mercury salts may lead to renal failure. RESPIRATORY: Aspiration or inhalation of inorganic mercury can lead to pneumonitis and acute lung injury.
CHRONIC TOXICITY: Gastrointestinal, renal, and neurologic symptoms predominate chronic inorganic mercury toxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms consist of abdominal pain, nausea, metallic taste, gingivostomatitis, loose teeth, and hypersalivation. Renal insufficiency due to acute tubular necrosis may occur. While inorganic mercury does not easily cross the blood brain barrier, long-term exposure may lead to conversion to organic mercury compounds which deposit into the CNS. Neurologic symptoms include tremor, neurasthenia, and withdrawn behavior (erethism). However, inorganic mercury exposure is unlikely to cause significant neurotoxicity. Chronic exposure to mercurial powders has led to acrodynia (Pink Disease), characterized by a morbilliform rash and erythematous edematous hyperkeratotic induration of the palms and soles associated with excessive sweating, tachycardia, photophobia, paraesthesias, and decreased reflexes.

POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARDS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Highly toxic, may be fatal if inhaled, swallowed or absorbed through skin.
Avoid any skin contact.
Effects of contact or inhalation may be delayed.
Fire may produce irritating, corrosive and/or toxic gases.
Runoff from fire control or dilution water may be corrosive and/or toxic and cause pollution.

-FIRST AID

FIRST AID AND PREHOSPITAL TREATMENT

PREHOSPITAL: Dermal exposures should be washed off with soap and water. Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not indicated.

-MEDICAL TREATMENT

LIFE SUPPORT

Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

SUMMARY

FIRST AID - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Move victim to fresh air.
Call 911 or emergency medical service.
Give artificial respiration if victim is not breathing.
Do not use mouth-to-mouth method if victim ingested or inhaled the substance;give artificial respiration with the aid of a pocket mask equipped with a one-way valve or other proper respiratory medical device.
Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult.
Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes.
In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes.
For minor skin contact, avoid spreading material on unaffected skin.
Keep victim warm and quiet.
Effects of exposure (inhalation, ingestion or skin contact) to substance may be delayed.
Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved and take precautions to protect themselves.

-RANGE OF TOXICITY

MINIMUM LETHAL EXPOSURE

CASE REPORTS

MERCURIC CHLORIDE INGESTION

The more commonly reported estimated lethal dose of ingested mercury I chloride in a 70 kg adult is 1 to 2 grams or 10 to 42 mg mercury/kg. Fatalities have occurred from exposures as low as 0.5 g (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007; Winek et al, 1981; US DHHS, 1994; Gosselin et al, 1984; Skerfving & Vostal, 1972). For most inorganic mercury compounds, the acute lethal dose for a 70 kg adult is 1 to 4 grams or 14 to 57 mg/kg (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
Nine cases of suicide following ingestion of mercuric chloride involved lethal doses ranging from 29 to > 50 mg/kg. Gastrointestinal lesion, albuminuria anuria, and uremia were commonly reported. Death due to renal failure has been reported following ingestion of an unknown amount of a Chinese medicine (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992; US DHHS, 1994).
An adult man died on the 91st day of admission from complications associated with ingestion of 6 grams of mercury chloride. Hemodialysis did NOT remove significant amounts of mercury chloride. Six plasma exchanges removed only 17 milligrams of mercury. No chelation therapy was performed (Sauder et al, 1988).
Death from inorganic mercury salts ingestion is usually due to severe corrosive injury to the gastrointestinal system, shock, cardiovascular collapse, and/or acute renal failure (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; US DHHS, 1994).

ROUTE OF EXPOSURE

PERITONEAL LAVAGE SOLUTIONS

Ten cases of severe toxic reactions, five of which resulted in death, have occurred following peritoneal lavage solutions containing mercuric chloride concentrations of 1:500 to 1:2000. In one case, death occurred after the use of a solution containing as little as 400 milligrams HgCl2 (Laundry et al, 1984).

MAXIMUM TOLERATED EXPOSURE

ROUTE OF EXPOSURE

INGESTION

Maximum tolerated oral concentrations, WITHOUT TREATMENT, are unknown.

An adult woman survived ingestion of 900 milligrams (13.8 milligrams/kilogram) of mercuric chloride. The woman vomited several times immediately after the ingestion and was treated with BAL, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and plasma exchange by 3 hours postingestion (Suzuki et al, 1992).

A 39-year-old woman vomited twice immediately after ingesting one 15 mL vial of a stool fixative (Para-Pak) containing 4.5% mercuric chloride (675 mg), 5% polyvinyl alcohol, 30% denatured alcohol, 4.5% acetic acid, and 1.5% glycerin in an aqueous solution. She was treated within 2 hours with dimercaprol and intravenous fluids. The serum and urinary mercury levels 2 hours post-ingestion were 710 ng/L and 276 mcg/L, respectively. She remained asymptomatic throughout her hospital course (Singer et al, 1994).

DERMAL

Neurotoxicity and elevated blood mercury levels resulted from the long term use of an ointment which contained 5% to 10% ammoniated mercury. The equivalent of approximately 1.5 to 2 kilograms of elemental mercury was applied to the skin in the ointment over 40 years (Kern et al, 1991).

Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 :

ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg

A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.

ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, as Hg

A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.

ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): D ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental

D : Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 3 ; Listed as: Mercury and inorganic mercury compounds

3 : The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury (metallic mercury and inorganic mercury compounds)

Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)

MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury, organic compounds

Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)

NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

TOXICITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT VALUES

EPA IRIS

EPA Risk Assessment Values for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011):

Oral:

Slope Factor:
RfD:

Inhalation:

Unit Risk:
RfC: 3x10(-4) mg/m3

Drinking Water:

Unit Risk:

TOXICITY VALUES

LCLo- (INHALATION)RABBIT:
- 29 mg/m(3) for 30H (RTECS , 1992)
TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
- 44,300 mcg/m(3) for 8H (RTECS , 1992)
- 150 mcg/m(3) for 46D (RTECS , 1992)
TDLo- (SKIN)HUMAN:
- 129 mg/kg for 5H-C (RTECS , 1992)

-STANDARDS AND LABELS

WORKPLACE STANDARDS

ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7439-97-6 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):

Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.

Adopted Value

Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg

TLV:

TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
TLV-STEL:
TLV-Ceiling:

Notations and Endnotes:

Carcinogenicity Category: A4
Codes: BEI, Skin
Definitions:

A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.

TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
Molecular Weight: Varies

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):

[(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:

[(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance

Adopted Value

Mercury, as Hg

TLV:

TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
TLV-STEL:
TLV-Ceiling:

Notations and Endnotes:

Carcinogenicity Category: A4
Codes: Not Listed
Definitions:

A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.

TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
Molecular Weight: 200.59

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):

[(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:

[(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance

Adopted Value

Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg

TLV:

TLV-TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
TLV-STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
TLV-Ceiling:

Notations and Endnotes:

Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
Codes: Skin
Definitions:

Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.

TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS and PNS impair; kidney dam
Molecular Weight: Varies

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):

[(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:

[(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance

Under Study

Mercury, alkyl compounds

TLV:

TLV-TWA:
TLV-STEL:
TLV-Ceiling:

Notations and Endnotes:

Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
Codes: Not Listed
Definitions: Not Listed

TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s):
Molecular Weight:

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):

[(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:

[(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance

Adopted Value

Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg

TLV:

TLV-TWA: 0.1 mg/m(3)
TLV-STEL:
TLV-Ceiling:

Notations and Endnotes:

Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
Codes: Skin
Definitions:

Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.

TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
Molecular Weight: Varies

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):

[(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45

For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:

[(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance

AIHA WEEL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (AIHA, 2006):

Not Listed

NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7439-97-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):

Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
REL:

TWA: Hg Vapor: 0.05 mg/m(3)
STEL:
Ceiling:
Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
Skin Designation: [skin]

Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.

Note(s): ,

Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
REL:

TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
Ceiling:
Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
Skin Designation: [skin]

Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.

Note(s):

IDLH:

IDLH: 10 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
Note(s): Not Listed

IDLH:

IDLH: 2 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
Note(s): Not Listed

OSHA PEL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):

Listed as: Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg)
Table Z-1 for Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg):

8-hour TWA:

ppm:

Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.

mg/m3:

Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.

Ceiling Value:
Skin Designation: No
Notation(s): Not Listed

Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
Table Z-1 for Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg):

8-hour TWA:

ppm:

Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.

mg/m3:

Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.

Ceiling Value:
Skin Designation: No
Notation(s): Not Listed

Listed as: Mercury (vapor) (as Hg)
Table Z-1 for Mercury (vapor) (as Hg):

8-hour TWA:

ppm:

Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.

mg/m3:

Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.

Ceiling Value:
Skin Designation: No
Notation(s): Not Listed

Table Z-2 for Mercury (Z37.8-1971):

8-hour TWA:
Acceptable Ceiling Concentration: 1 mg/10m(3)
Acceptable Maximum Peak above the Ceiling Concentration for an 8-hour Shift:

Concentration:
Maximum Duration:

Notation(s): Not Listed

OSHA List of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, Toxics, and Reactives for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2010):

Not Listed

ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS

EPA CERCLA, Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010):

Listed as: Mercury (D009)
Final Reportable Quantity, in pounds (kilograms):

1 (0.454)

Additional Information: Unlisted Hazardous Wastes Characteristic of Toxicity
Listed as: Mercury
Final Reportable Quantity, in pounds (kilograms):

1 (0.454)

Additional Information:
Listed as: Mercury and compounds

Additional Information:
Listed as: Mercury Compounds

Additional Information:

EPA CERCLA, Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities, Radionuclides for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010):

Not Listed

EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Number for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010b):

Listed as: Mercury
P or U series number: U151
Footnote:
Editor's Note: The D, F, and K series waste numbers and Appendix VIII to Part 261 -- Hazardous Constituents were not included. Please refer to 40 CFR Part 261.

EPA SARA Title III, Extremely Hazardous Substance List for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010):

Not Listed

EPA SARA Title III, Community Right-to-Know for CAS7439-97-6 (40 CFR 372.65, 2006; 40 CFR 372.28, 2006):

Listed as: Mercury compounds
Effective Date for Reporting Under 40 CFR 372.30:
Lower Thresholds for Chemicals of Special Concern under 40 CFR 372.28: 10

See 40 CFR 372.28: Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern

Listed as: Mercury Compounds: Includes any unique chemical substance that contains mercury as part of that chemical's infrastructure
Effective Date for Reporting Under 40 CFR 372.30: 1/1/87
Lower Thresholds for Chemicals of Special Concern under 40 CFR 372.28:

Listed as: Mercury
Effective Date for Reporting Under 40 CFR 372.30:
Lower Thresholds for Chemicals of Special Concern under 40 CFR 372.28: 10

See 40 CFR 372.28: Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern

Listed as: Mercury
Effective Date for Reporting Under 40 CFR 372.30: 1/1/87
Lower Thresholds for Chemicals of Special Concern under 40 CFR 372.28:

DOT List of Marine Pollutants for CAS7439-97-6 (49 CFR 172.101 - App. B, 2005):

Listed as Mercury (I) (mercurous) compounds (pesticides)
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury (II) (mercuric) compounds (pesticides)
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury based pesticide, liquid, flammable, toxic
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury based pesticides, liquid, toxic
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury based pesticides, liquid, toxic, flammable
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury based pesticides, solid, toxic
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury compounds, liquid, n.o.s.
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes
Listed as Mercury compounds, solid, n.o.s.
Severe Marine Pollutant: Yes

EPA TSCA Inventory for CAS7439-97-6 (EPA, 2005):

Listed as: Mercury

SHIPPING REGULATIONS

SURFACE

DOT -- Table of Hazardous Materials and Special Provisions (49 CFR 172.101, 2005):

Not Listed

ICAO International Shipping Name (ICAO, 2002):

Not Listed

LABELS

NFPA

NFPA Hazard Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 (NFPA, 2002):

Not Listed

-PERSONAL PROTECTION

SUMMARY

RECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE CLOTHING - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).
Wear chemical protective clothing that is specifically recommended by the manufacturer. It may provide little or no thermal protection.
Structural firefighters' protective clothing provides limited protection in fire situations ONLY; it is not effective in spill situations where direct contact with the substance is possible.

PROTECTIVE CLOTHING

CHEMICAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. Search results for CAS 7439-97-6.

All data are compiled from published sources and are NOT recommended specifically by Truven Health Analytics. The appearance of specific manufacturers or products in this section does not represent an endorsement by Truven Health Analytics. No attempt has been made to verify the data presented. All product recommendations should be confirmed with the specific manufacturer for verification of product performance.
CLOTHING

Microporous Fabric

Workrite

CSP Garments

Degradation Rating: PASS
Breakthrough Time (minutes): Not Listed
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): Not Listed
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (Workrite, 1997)

Plastic Laminate

DuPont Personal Protection

CPF 2

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): None detected
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Responder

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): None detected
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Responder Plus

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): None detected
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem 10,000

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.001
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem 7500

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): Not Tested
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): Not Tested
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem 9400

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0002
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem BR

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0002
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem F

Degradation Rating: Not Listed
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.04
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2003)

Tychem LV

Degradation Rating: Not Listed
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.001
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2003)

Tychem QC

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): Not Tested
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): Not Tested
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem SL

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0005
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)
Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0005
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

Tychem ThermoPro

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.04
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2003)

Tychem TK

Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0002
Notes: liquid
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)
Degradation Rating: No Degradation Rating provided
Breakthrough Time (minutes): >480
Permeation Rate (mcg/cm2/min): <0.0002
Notes: Not Listed
Citation: (DuPont, 2002)

FOOTWEAR

Specific recommendations and test data for this product type were not found in the available manufacturers' product literature.

GLOVES

Specific recommendations and test data for this product type were not found in the available manufacturers' product literature.

GENERAL INFORMATION

This section provides a compilation of chemical resistance information and test data for specific protective clothing products. Chemical resistance information includes both degradation resistance ratings and permeation resistance data. This information is designed to assist in the selection of appropriate protective clothing. Only data on specific products and manufacturers are included. Generic information or recommendations are not provided since significant differences can exist in the chemical resistance for apparent similar product types.
Specific product information is organized by general product type (gloves, garments, and footwear), material type, and manufacturer. The category 'garments' may include totally encapsulating suits, splash suits, as well as other items (e.g., coveralls, jackets, and aprons). Specific manufacturers should be contacted to determine the features of available styles/models.
In addition to chemical resistance information, there are many critical variables in the selection of protective clothing which cannot be represented in this summary of the literature. Some factors to be considered in choosing protective clothing include, but are not limited to: overall clothing integrity, physical hazard resistance, durability, human factors, ease of decontamination, and cost. Overall clothing integrity refers to a specific design's ability to offer consistent protection for all clothing-covered areas of the body. Physical hazards include resisting the effects of abrasion, cuts, tears, and punctures. Human factors entail effects on wearer mobility, visibility, and hearing for garments; dexterity, tactility, and grip for gloves; ankle support and weight for footwear; and, any effect of the clothing on the function of the wearer. There are several variations in the design for gloves, garments, and footwear that affect these factors. Protective clothing must properly be sized and correctly fit the wearer to ensure its proper use and function.
As required in the U.S.A., protective clothing should be selected based on a risk assessment of the workplace. This risk assessment must account for the identification of existing as well as potential hazards and involve the recommendation of protective clothing appropriate for the identified hazards. Therefore, the recommendations in this section should not be used as the sole basis for decisions on choice of protective clothing, but rather should be used as a tool by qualified occupational health and safety professionals or other technically qualified persons in conjunction with a review of all mitigating factors. Consult the OSHA PPE Standard (29 CFR 1910.132 - 1910.138) for regulations and additional guidance regarding the selection and use of protective clothing and equipment. For general information on protective clothing selection, refer to the "PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT - OSHA PUB 3077" document.
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING SELECTION

Determine the type of protective clothing item needed based on a risk assessment (e.g., gloves, garments, footwear).
For high risk situations, choose clothing that covers all parts of the body that may be exposed. In many cases, multiple clothing items will be required. Low risk situations may permit partial body protective clothing. Select protective clothing products that have reported chemical resistance data. High risk situations involving full body clothing or extended chemical contact often require permeation resistance data to determine the barrier effectiveness of materials used in the construction of clothing. Relatively low risk situations, where only splash or incidental exposure occur, may allow use of protective clothing based on degradation or penetration resistance data. Specifics on the interpretation of chemical resistance data are presented below.
Other factors must be considered in addition to chemical resistance. The selected chemical protective clothing item should offer the optimal combination of protection against identified hazards while allowing maximum function and comfort.

INTERPRETATION OF DEGRADATION RATINGS

Degradation refers to physical changes in a material as the result of chemical exposure. Degradation may become evident in visible changes, such as discoloration, swelling, delamination, deterioration, or disintegration. Degradation effects may also be measured by weight change or other changes in a material's physical properties (e.g., strength, elasticity, hardness).
Degradation resistance ratings are provided by manufacturers to rate the amount of degradation that occurs for a particular protective clothing material when contacted by a chemical. All degradation ratings are qualitative and include ratings, such as "EXCELLENT," "GOOD," "FAIR," "POOR," and "NOT RECOMMENDED." There is no standard test method for the measurement of chemical degradation resistance; therefore, manufacturer ratings may be based on different testing approaches. This makes comparison of degradation ratings between manufacturers unreliable.
The use of degradation resistance ratings alone to recommend protective clothing, particularly for high hazard situations, should be avoided. Degradation resistance testing does not directly assess the barrier quality of protective clothing, since materials can show relatively little degradation but still allow either permeation or penetration by a chemical. Degradation resistance ratings can be used to exclude protective clothing materials from consideration. Protective clothing materials with a "NOT RECOMMENDED" degradation resistance rating should never be used.
For some products, the rating "NO PENETRATION" is provided. This refers to penetration resistance test results that are based on a different procedure (American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Method F 903). Penetration resistance testing involves placing a material sample in a test cell, exposing the exterior side of the material to a chemical, and then observing the interior side of the material for visible signs of liquid penetration. Part of the test is conducted at an elevated pressure. Test results are reported as pass (no penetration) or fail (penetration detected). Unlike degradation testing, penetration testing provides an assessment of protective clothing material barrier performance. Since penetration resistance testing examines only observable amounts of liquid penetration, permeation may still occur. The use of penetration resistance data must be restricted to liquid chemicals, and should be limited to scenarios where there is no reasonable vapor exposure hazard under the conditions of exposure.

INTERPRETATION OF PERMEATION DATA

Permeation is the process of chemical movement through a material on a molecular level. Permeation resistance refers to the ability of a material to retard or prevent chemical movement through it. Permeation may occur without any visible signs of degradation.
Permeation resistance is measured using a test cell which is divided into two halves by a protective clothing specimen. Chemical is placed on the challenge side, while the collection side is periodically monitored for permeating chemical. Permeation data were obtained in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Method F 739 (Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing to Permeation by Liquids and Gases), unless stated otherwise. In the case of chemicals that are classified as warfare agents, the data were obtained in accordance with the Military Standard 282 (MIL-STD-282) (Military Standard, Filter Units, Protective Clothing, Gas-Mask Components, and Related Products: Performance Test Methods).
Permeation rate is the amount of chemical that passes through a material for a measured surface area per unit time. In this section, permeation rate is expressed in micrograms per square centimeter per minute (mcg/cm(2)/min). The reported permeation rate is either the steady-state rate or the maximum rate observed during testing. In some cases, very large permeation rates exceed measurement techniques and are reported as ">" (greater than) or "HIGH."
Breakthrough time is the elapsed time, in minutes, from the time the chemical comes in contact with the material exterior surface, to the time that chemical is detected on the interior surface. When no breakthrough is detected, the breakthrough time is report as ">" the testing period. If permeation breakthrough is rapid, results are reported as "<" (less than) the earlier sampling time or as "IMMEDIATELY" (which usually means breakthrough in less than 4 minutes).
The breakthrough time should exceed the expected use period of the selected protective clothing. Additionally, there are several other factors that must be taken into account to provide appropriate protection.
Permeation testing is usually conducted with full strength, undiluted chemical for the duration of the test period. Actual exposures may involve diluted chemical for short or intermittent exposure periods.
Permeation testing is usually conducted at room temperature. Permeation occurs faster at elevated temperatures (short breakthrough times and higher permeation rates) and slower at reduced temperatures (long breakthrough times and lower permeation rates).
Permeation resistance of mixtures cannot usually be determined on the basis of the individual chemicals making up the mixture. Synergistic effects may occur and result in more rapid permeation than accounted for by the individual mixture chemicals.
Permeation rates may be used to calculate potential wearer exposure; however, several assumptions must be made about the extent of exposure and condition of clothing wear. Furthermore, there are few chemicals with dermal exposure limits, making it difficult to determine an acceptable skin exposure level.

COMPANY INFORMATION

DuPont Personal Protection P. O. Box 80705 Wilmington, DE 19880-0705 USA Phone: (302) 774-1000 Toll-Free: (800) 931-3456 Website: http://personalprotection.dupont.com Email: personalprotection@usa.dupont.com
Workrite 500 East Third Street Box 1192 Oxnard, CA 93032 USA Phone: (805) 483-0715 Fax: (805) 483-0678 Toll-Free: (800) 521-1888 Website: http://www.workrite.com Email: info@workrite.com

REFERENCES

CHEMICAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING CITATIONS

The following sources were consulted for chemical protective clothing data:

(Ansell-Edmont, 2001)
(Bata Shoe Company, 1995)
(Best Manufacturing, 2002)
(Best Manufacturing, 2004)
(Boss Manufacturing Company, 1998)
(ChemFab Corporation, 1993)
(Comasec Safety, Inc., 2003)
(Comasec Safety, Inc., 2003a)
(DuPont, 2002)
(DuPont, 2002)
(DuPont, 2003)
(Guardian Manufacturing Group, 2001)
(ILC Dover, Inc., 1998)
(Kappler Inc., 2001)
(Kimberly-Clark, 2002)
(LaCrosse-Rainfair, 1997)
(MAPA Professional, 2003)
(MAPA Professional, 2004)
(Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc, 1995)
(Marigold Industrial, 2003)
(Memphis Glove Company, 2001)
(Montgomery Safety Products, 1995)
(Nat-Wear, 2001)
(Neese Industries, Inc., 2003)
(North, 2002)
(North, 2002)
(Playtex, 1995)
(River City, 1995)
(Safety 4, 2002)
(Servus, 1995)
(Standard Safety Equipment, 1995)
(Tingley, 2002)
(Trelleborg-Viking, Inc., 2001)
(Trelleborg-Viking, Inc., 2002)
(Wells Lamont Industrial, 2002)
(Workrite, 1997)

-PHYSICAL HAZARDS

FIRE HAZARD

SUMMARY

Editor's Note: This material is not listed in the Emergency Response Guidebook. Based on the material's physical and chemical properties, toxicity, or chemical group, a guide has been assigned. For additional technical information, contact one of the emergency response telephone numbers listed under Public Safety Measures.
POTENTIAL FIRE OR EXPLOSION HAZARDS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)
- Non-combustible, substance itself does not burn but may decompose upon heating to produce corrosive and/or toxic fumes.
- Containers may explode when heated.
- Runoff may pollute waterways.

FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION

NFPA Flammability Rating for CAS7439-97-6 (NFPA, 2002):

Not Listed

FIRE CONTROL/EXTINGUISHING AGENTS

SMALL FIRE PRECAUTIONS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Dry chemical, CO2 or water spray.

LARGE FIRE PRECAUTIONS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Water spray, fog or regular foam.
Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk.
Dike fire control water for later disposal; do not scatter the material.
Use water spray or fog; do not use straight streams.

TANK OR CAR/TRAILER LOAD FIRE PRECAUTIONS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles.
Do not get water inside containers.
Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out.
Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank.
ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire.
For massive fire, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles; if this is impossible, withdraw from area and let fire burn.

NFPA Extinguishing Methods for CAS7439-97-6 (NFPA, 2002):

Not Listed

EVACUATION PROCEDURES

SUMMARY

Editor's Note: This material is not listed in the Table of Initial Isolation and Protective Action Distances.

SPILL - PUBLIC SAFETY EVACUATION DISTANCES - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

Increase, in the downwind direction, as necessary, the isolation distance of at least 25 to 50 meters (80 to 160 feet) in all directions.

FIRE - PUBLIC SAFETY EVACUATION DISTANCES - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions.

PUBLIC SAFETY MEASURES - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)

CALL Emergency Response Telephone Number on Shipping Paper first. If Shipping Paper not available or no answer, refer to appropriate telephone number:

MEXICO:

SETIQ:

01-800-00-214-00 in the Mexican Republic;
For calls originating in Mexico City and the Metropolitan Area: 5559-1588;
For calls originating elsewhere, call: 011-52-555-559-1588.

CENACOM:

01-800-00-413-00 in the Mexican Republic;
For calls originating in Mexico City and the Metropolitan Area: 5550-1496, 5550-1552, 5550-1485, or 5550-4885;
For calls originating elsewhere, call: 011-52-555-550-1496, or 011-52-555-550-1552; 011-52-555-550-1485, or 011-52-555-550-4885.

ARGENTINA:

CIQUIME:

0-800-222-2933 in the Republic of Argentina;
For calls originating elsewhere, call: +54-11-4613-1100.

BRAZIL:

PRÓ-QUÍMICA:

0-800-118270 (Toll-free in Brazil);
For calls originating elsewhere, call: +55-11-232-1144 (Collect calls are accepted).

COLUMBIA:

CISPROQUIM:

01-800-091-6012 in Colombia;
For calls originating in Bogotá, Colombia, call: 288-6012;
For calls originating elsewhere, call: 011-57-1-288-6012.

CANADA:

CANUTEC:

613-996-6666 (Collect calls are accepted);
*666 cellular (in Canada only).

UNITED STATES:

CHEMTREC®:

1-800-424-9300 (Toll-free in the U.S., Canada, and the U.S. Virgin Islands);
703-527-3887 for calls originating elsewhere (Collect calls are accepted).

CHEM-TEL, INC.:

1-800-255-3924 (Toll-free in the U.S., Canada, and the U.S. Virgin Islands);
813-248-0585 for calls originating elsewhere (Collect calls are accepted).

INFOTRAC:

1-800-535-5053 (Toll-free in the U.S., Canada, and the U.S. Virgin Islands);
352-323-3500 for calls originating elsewhere (Collect calls are accepted).

3E COMPANY:

1-800-451-8346 (Toll-free in the U.S., Canada, and the U.S. Virgin Islands);
760-602-8703 for calls originating elsewhere (Collect calls are accepted).

NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (NRC):

1-800-424-8802 - (24 hours) (Toll-free in the U.S., Canada, and the U.S. Virgin Islands);
202-267-2675 for calls in the District of Columbia.

MILITARY SHIPMENTS:

703-697-0218 - Explosives/ammunition incidents (Collect calls are accepted);
1-800-851-8061 - All other dangerous goods incidents.

NATIONWIDE POISON CONTROL CENTER (United States only):

1-800-222-1222 (Toll-free in the U.S.).

For additional details see the section entitled "WHO TO CALL FOR ASSISTANCE" under the ERG Instructions.
As an immediate precautionary measure, isolate spill or leak area in all directions for at least 50 meters (150 feet) for liquids and at least 25 meters (75 feet) for solids.
Keep unauthorized personnel away.
Stay upwind.
Keep out of low areas.

AIHA ERPG Values for CAS7439-97-6 (AIHA, 2006):

Listed as Mercury vapor
ERPG-1 (units = ppm): Not appropriate
ERPG-2 (units = ppm): 0.25
ERPG-3 (units = ppm): 0.5
Under Ballot, Review, or Consideration: No
Definitions:

ERPG-1: The ERPG-1 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing more than mild, transient adverse health effects or perceiving a clearly defined objectionable odor.
ERPG-2: The ERPG-2 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing or developing irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms that could impair an individual's ability to take protective action.
ERPG-3: The ERPG-3 is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing or developing life-threatening health effects.

DOE TEEL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management, 2010):

Listed as Mercury vapor
TEEL-0 (units = mg/m3): 0.025
TEEL-1 (units = mg/m3): 0.25
TEEL-2 (units = mg/m3): 1.7
TEEL-3 (units = mg/m3): 8.9
Definitions:

TEEL-0: The threshold concentration below which most people will experience no adverse health effects.
TEEL-1: The airborne concentration (expressed as ppm [parts per million] or mg/m(3) [milligrams per cubic meter]) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic, nonsensory effects. However, these effects are not disabling and are transient and reversible upon cessation of exposure.
TEEL-2: The airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m(3)) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting, adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape.
TEEL-3: The airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m(3)) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience life-threatening adverse health effects or death.

AEGL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (National Research Council, 2010; National Research Council, 2009; National Research Council, 2008; National Research Council, 2007; NRC, 2001; NRC, 2002; NRC, 2003; NRC, 2004; NRC, 2004; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2009; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2008; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2007; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2005; National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances, 2006; 62 FR 58840, 1997; 65 FR 14186, 2000; 65 FR 39264, 2000; 65 FR 77866, 2000; 66 FR 21940, 2001; 67 FR 7164, 2002; 68 FR 42710, 2003; 69 FR 54144, 2004):

Listed as: Mercury vapor
Proposed Value:

AEGL-1

10 min exposure:

ppm: Not recommended because mercury vapor has no odor or warning properties at concentrations that may cause health effects
mg/m3:

30 min exposure:

ppm: Not recommended because mercury vapor has no odor or warning properties at concentrations that may cause health effects
mg/m3:

1 hr exposure:

ppm: Not recommended because mercury vapor has no odor or warning properties at concentrations that may cause health effects
mg/m3:

4 hr exposure:

ppm: Not recommended because mercury vapor has no odor or warning properties at concentrations that may cause health effects
mg/m3:

8 hr exposure:

ppm: Not recommended because mercury vapor has no odor or warning properties at concentrations that may cause health effects
mg/m3:

Definitions:

AEGL-1 is the airborne concentration of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic non-sensory effects. However, the effects are not disabling, are transient, and are reversible upon cessation of exposure.

Listed as: Mercury vapor
Proposed Value:

AEGL-2

10 min exposure:

ppm: 0.38 ppm
mg/m3: 3.1 mg/m(3)

30 min exposure:

ppm: 0.26 ppm
mg/m3: 2.1 mg/m(3)

1 hr exposure:

ppm: 0.21 ppm
mg/m3: 1.7 mg/m(3)

4 hr exposure:

ppm: 0.08 ppm
mg/m3: 0.67 mg/m(3)

8 hr exposure:

ppm: 0.04 ppm
mg/m3: 0.33 mg/m(3)

Definitions:

AEGL-2 is the airborne concentration of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape.

Listed as: Mercury vapor
Proposed Value:

AEGL-3

10 min exposure:

ppm: 2 ppm
mg/m3: 16 mg/m(3)

30 min exposure:

ppm: 1.3 ppm
mg/m3: 11 mg/m(3)

1 hr exposure:

ppm: 1.1 ppm
mg/m3: 8.9 mg/m(3)

4 hr exposure:

ppm: 0.27 ppm
mg/m3: 2.2 mg/m(3)

8 hr exposure:

ppm: 0.27 ppm
mg/m3: 2.2 mg/m(3)

Definitions:

AEGL-3 is the airborne concentration of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience life-threatening health effects or death.

NIOSH IDLH Values for CAS7439-97-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):

IDLH: 10 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
Note(s): Not Listed
IDLH: 2 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
Note(s): Not Listed

CONTAINMENT/WASTE TREATMENT OPTIONS

SUMMARY

SPILL OR LEAK PRECAUTIONS - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)
- Do not touch damaged containers or spilled material unless wearing appropriate protective clothing.
- Stop leak if you can do it without risk.
- Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas.
- Cover with plastic sheet to prevent spreading.
- Absorb or cover with dry earth, sand or other non-combustible material and transfer to containers.
- DO NOT GET WATER INSIDE CONTAINERS.
RECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE CLOTHING - EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDEBOOK, GUIDE 151 (ERG, 2004)
- Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).
- Wear chemical protective clothing that is specifically recommended by the manufacturer. It may provide little or no thermal protection.
- Structural firefighters' protective clothing provides limited protection in fire situations ONLY; it is not effective in spill situations where direct contact with the substance is possible.

-PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

MOLECULAR WEIGHT

200.59

-REFERENCES

GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.

40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.

49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.

49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.

62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.

65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.

65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.

65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.

66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.

67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.

68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.

69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.

AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.

ARLAUSKAS A: ENVIRON RES 1985; 36:379-388.

Aaseth J, Alexander J, & Raknerud N: Treatment of mercuric chloride poisoning with dimercaptosuccininc acid and diuretics: preliminary studies. J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:173-186.

Abdelmegid L, Salem E, & Elsadik Y: A study on some biochemical renal parameters in workers exposed to elemental mercury vapors (abstract). Vet hum Toxicol 1993; 35:355.

Adams CR, Ziegler DK, & Lin JT: Mercury intoxication stimulating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA 1983; 250:642-643.

Afonso J & de Alverez R: Effects of mercury on human gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 80:145-154.

Agarwal SK, Tiwari SC, & Dash SC: Spectrum of poisoning requiring haemodialysis in a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16:20-22.

Al-Saleh I, Abduljabbar M, Al-Rouqi R, et al: Mercury (Hg) exposure in breast-fed infants and their mothers and the evidence of oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013; 153(1-3):145-154.

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.

Anon: Cutis laxa and other congenital defects with penicillamine, ADR Highlights (Division of drug experience), Rockville, MD, 1981, pp 1-4-81-21.

Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.

Arbeitsgruppe BGVV: Allgemeine und spezielle Massnahmen bei Vergiftungen und bei Drogennotfaellen. Empfehlungen der Kommission "Erkennung und Behandlung von Vergiftungen", Bundesinstituts fuer gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinaermedizin, Berlin, Germany, 1996.

Ashton CE, Illa KK, & Mant T: 2,3-Dimercaptopropane-1-sulphonate (DMPS) in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning, an effective and potentially life saving treatment (Abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 34.

Baglan RJ et al: Proc Ann NSF Trace Contam Conf, 1st Iss Conf; 730802:505-509, 1974.

Barilyak IR: Gig Sanit 1984; 10:65-67.

Barlow SM & Sullivan FM: Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals, Academic Press, London, UK, 1982, pp 386-406.

Barregard L: Biological monitoring of exposure to mercury vapor. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 1:45-9.

Bass DH & Millar AJW: Mercury absorption following button battery ingestion. J Ped Surg 1992; 27:1541-1542.

Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.

Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A Systems Affected Approach to Veterinary Toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1990.

Beck RB, Rosenbaum KN, & Byers PH: Ultrastructural findings in fetal penicillamine syndrome, 14th March of Dimes Ann Birth Defects Conf, San Diego, CA, 1981.

Bell CL & Graziano FM: The safety of administration of penicillamine to penicillin-sensitive individuals. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26:801-803.

Bencko V, Wagner V, & Wagnerova M: Immunological profiles in workers occupationally exposed to inorganic mercury. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 1990; 34:9-15.

Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.

Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.

Blanusa M, Varnai VM, Piasek M, et al: Chelators as antidotes of metal toxicity: therapeutic and experimental aspects. Curr Med Chem 2005; 12(23):2771-2794.

Boadi WY, Urbach J, & Brandes JM: In vitro effect of mercury on enzyme activities and its accumulation in the first-trimester human placenta. Environ Res 1992; 57:96-106.

Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.

Bourgeois M, Dooms-Goossens A, & Knockaert D: Mercury intoxication after topical application of a metallic mercury ointment. Dermatologica 1986; 172:48-51.

Budavari S: The Merck Index, 11th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, 1989.

CDC: Mercury poisoning associated with beauty cream -- Texas, New Mexico, and California, 1995-1996. Report by Occ-Env-Med-L Mail list on Internet, Duke Occup/Environ Medicine Division (May 17), 1996.

Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.

Caravati EM: D-Penicillamine. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.

Cardenas A, Roels H, & Bernard AM: Markers of early renal changes induced by industrial pollutants. I. Application to workers exposed to mercury vapour. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50:17-27.

Carvajal HF & Stewart CE: Emergency management of burn patients: the first few hours. Emerg Med Reports 1987; 8:129-136.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Mercury exposure among household users and nonusers of skin-lightening creams produced in Mexico - California and Virginia, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61(2):33-36.

Chakera A, Lasserson D, Beck LH Jr, et al: Membranous nephropathy after use of UK-manufactured skin creams containing mercury. QJM 2011; 104(10):893-896.

Chan MM, Cheung RC, Chan IH, et al: An unusual case of mercury intoxication. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144(1):192-194.

Chapman LJ, Sauter SL, & Henning RA: Differences in frequency of finger tremor in otherwise asymptomatic mercury workers. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:838-843.

ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.

Cherian MG: Arch Environ Health 1978; 33:109-114.

Chowdhury AR & Arora U: Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 1982; 26:246-249.

Chu CC, Huang CC, Ryu SJ, et al: Chronic inorganic mercury induced peripheral neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand 1998; 98(6):461-465.

Chugh KS, Singhal PC, & Uberoi HS: Rhabdomyolysis and renal failure in acute mercuric chloride poisoning. Med J Aust 1978; 2:125-126.

Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.

Clarkson TW: Mercury - an element of mystery (editorial). N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1137-1138.

Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.

Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.

Contrino J, Marucha P, & Ribaudo R: Effects of mercury on human polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in vitro. Am J Pathol 1988; 132:110-118.

Cordeiro Q Jr, de Araujo Medrado Faria M, & Fraguas R Jr: Depression, insomnia, and memor loss in a patient with chronic intoxication by inorganic mercury (letter). J Neuropsychiat Clin Neurosci 2003; 15(4):457-458.

DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.

De Bont B, Lauwerys R, & Govaerts H: Yellow mercuric oxide ointment and mercury intoxiciation. Eur J Pediatr 1986; 145:217-218.

Debray P, Besson-Leaud M, & Lavaud J: Intoxication aigue par le mercure chez L'enfant: a propos de quatre observations [Acute mercury poisoning in children: 4 cases]. (Translated from French by Alan H. Hall). Ann Pediatr 1979; 26:531-537.

DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.

DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.

DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.

Dyall-Smith DJ & Scurry JP: Mercury pigmentation and high mercury levels from the use of a cosmetic cream. Med J Aust 1990; 153:409-415.

EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.

ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.

Eagle H & Magnuson HJ: The systemic treatment of 227 cases of arsenic poisoning (encephalitis, dermatitis, blood dyscrasia, jaundice, fever) with 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). Am J Syph Gonor Ven Dis 1946; 30:420-441.

Ellingsen DG, Andersen A, & Nordhagen HP: Incidence of cancer and mortality among workers exposed to mercury vapour in the Norwegian chloralkali industry. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50(10):875-880.

Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.

Erkek N , Senel S , Sarac A , et al: Being alive after a severe inorganic mercury intoxication. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(5):625-628.

Ermachenko AB: Gig Sanit 1982; 11:72-73.

Ernst E & Lauritsen JG: Effect of organic and inorganic mercury on human sperm motility. Pharmacol Toxicol 1991; 68:440-444.

FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.

FOLKL H & KONIG P: WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR 1983; 95:580-584.

Feehally J, Wheeler DC, Mackay EH, et al: Recurrent acute renal failure with interstitial nephritis due to D-penicillamine. Renal Failure 1987; 10:55-57.

Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.

Franco A, Antolin A, Trigueros M, et al: Two consecutive episodes of acute renal failure following mercury poisoning. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12(2):328-330.

Gale GR, Smith AB, & Jones MM: Meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid monoalkyl esters: effects on mercury levels in mice. Toxicology 1993; 81:49-56.

Garza-Ocanas L, Torres-Alanis O, & Pineyro-Lopez A: Urinary mercury in twelve cases of cutaneous mercurous chloride (calomel) exposure: effect of sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate (DMPS) therapy. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35(6):653-655.

Girardi G & Elias MM: Effectivelness of N-acetylcysteine in protecting against mercuric chloride-induced nephrotoxicity. Toxicology 1991; 67:155-164.

Giunta F, DiLandro D, & Chiaranda M: Severe acute poisoning from the ingestion of a permanent wave solution of mercuric chloride. Human Toxicol 1983; 2:243-246.

Gledhill RF & Hopkins AP: Chronic inorganic mercury poisoning treated with N-acetyl-D-penicillamine. Brit J Industr Med 1972; 29:225-228.

Goldman M & Blackburn P: The effect of mercuric chloride on thyroid function in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 48:49-55.

Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.

Goncharuk GA: Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1971; 7:73-75.

Goncharuk GA: Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1977; 5:17-20.

Gonzalez MJ, Rico MC, & Hernandez LM: Mercury in human hair: a study of residents in Madrid, Spain. Arch Environ Health 1985; 40:225-228.

Gosselin RE, Smith RP, & Hodge HC: Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1984.

Govorunova NN: Gig Sanit 1981; 5:73-74.

Goyer RA: Toxic effects of metals. In: MO Amdur, J Doull & CD Klaassen (Eds): Casarett and Doull's Toxicology, 4th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991.

Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.

Grant MW: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 213,214,488621-624.

Graziano JH, Cuccia D, & Friedheim E: Potential usefulness of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid for the treatment of arsenic poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 207:1051-1055.

Graziano JH, Siris ES, & Lolacono N: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid as an antidote for lead intoxication. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985; 37:432-438.

Graziano JH: Role of 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning. Med Toxicol 1986; 1:155-162.

Gricar M, Jamsek M, & Mozina M: Toxicokinetics of mercury in HgCl2 poisoning, treated with prolonged use of intravenous DMPS (abstract), EAPCCT XVI International Congress, Vienna, Austria, 1994.

Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.

HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.

Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.

Haynes BW Jr: Emergency department management of minor burns. Top Emerg Med 1981; 3:35-40.

Hla KK, Ashton CE, & Henry JA: Adverse effects from 2,3-dimercaptopropane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 13.

Ho BS, Lin JL, Huang CC, et al: Mercury vapor inhalation from Chinese red (Cinnabar). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41(1):75-78.

Holmes AS, Blaxill MF, & Haley BE: Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. Int J Toxicol 2003; 22:277-285.

Howland MA: Dimercaprol (BAL), in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.

Hryhorczuk DO, Meyers L, & Chen G: Treatment of mercury intoxication in a dentist with N-acetyl-D, L-penicillamine. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:401-408.

Hultman P & Johansson U: Strain differences in the effect of mercury on murine cell-mediated immune reactions. Fd Chem Toxic 1991; 29:633-638.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.

IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in the Glass Manufacturing Industry, Volume 58, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993, pp 239-288.

IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.

ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.

ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.

International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.

Ishihara N, Shiojima S, & Suzuki T: Selective enhancement of urinary organic mercury excretion by D-penicillamine. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:245-249.

Jeddeloh RJ, Lake KD, & Brown DC: Ammoniated mercury membraneous nephropathy. Minn Med 1985; 68:591-592.

Kahn A, Denis R, & Blum D: Accidental ingestion of mercuric sulphate in a 4-year-old child. Clin Peds 1977; 10:956-958.

Kajiwara Y & Inouye M: Effects of methylmercury and mercuric chloride on preimplantation mouse embryos in vivo. Teratology 1986; 33:231-237.

Kanerva L, Komulainen M, & Estlander T: Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mercury. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28:26-28.

Kang-Yum E & Oransky SH: Chinese patent medicine as a potential source of mercury poisoning. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:235-238.

Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.

Kark RAP, Poskanzer DC, & Bullock JD: Mercury poisoning and its treatment with N-acetyl-d,l-penicillamine. N Engl J Med 1971; 285:10-16.

Kay A: European league against rheumatism study of adverse reactions to D-penicillamine. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25:193-198.

Kern F, Roberts N, & Ostlere L: Ammoniated mercury ointment as a cause of peripheral neuropathy. Dermatologica 1991; 183:280-282.

Kershaw TG, Dhahir PH, & Clarkson TW: The relationship between blood levels and dose of methylmercury in man. Arch Environ Health 1980; 35:28-35.

Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.

Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.

Klaassen KD: Heavy metals and heavy metal antagonists. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS et al (Eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 1598-1602.

Knight AL: Mercury and its compounds. In: Zenz C (Ed): Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chicago, IL, 1988, pp 590-596.

Koh C, Kwong KL, & Wong SN: Mercury poisoning: a rare but treatable cause of failure to thrive and developmental regression in an infant. Hong Kong Med J 2009; 15(1):61-64.

Kojima S, Shimada H, & Kiyozumi M: Comparative effects of chelating agents on distribution, excretion, and renal toxicity of inorganic mercury in rats. Research Comm Chem Path Pharmacol 1989; 64:471-484.

Kosnett M, Dutra C, & Osterloh J: Nephrotoxicity from elemental mercury: protective effects of dimercaptosuccinic acid (abstract 85). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:351.

Kostyniak PJ, Greizerstein HB, & Goldstein J: Extracorporeal regional complexing haemodialysis treatment of acute inorganic mercury intoxication. Human Toxicol 1990; 9:137-141.

Kosuda LL & Hosseinzadeh H: Role of RT6+ T lymphocytes in mercury- induced renal autoimmunity: experimental manipulations of "susceptible" and "resistant" rats. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1994; 42:303-321.

Kosuda LL, Greiner DL, & Bigazzi PE: Mercury-induced renal autoimmunity: changes in RT6+ T-lymphocytes of susceptible and resistant rats. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 191:178-185.

Kulling P, Keychting K, & Skold H: DMPS and DMSA in mercury poisoning: two case reports of successful treatment (abstract P-024), EAPCCT International Congress, Krakow, Poland, 1995.

Kuntzelman DR & Angle CR: Abnormal liver function in childhood lead poisoning unaffected by DMSA (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:355.

LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.

Langworth S, Almkvist O, & Soderman E: Effects of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the central nervous system. Br J Ind Med 1992; 29:545-555.

Langworth S, Elinder CG, & Sundquist KG: Renal and immunological effects of occupational exposure to inorganic mercury. Br J Ind Med 1992a; 49:394-401.

Laundry T, Adam AE, & Kershaw JB: Deaths after peritoneal lavage with mercuric chloride solutions: case report and review of the literature. Br Med J 1984; 289:96-98.

Lauwerys R, Bonnier Ch, & Evrard Ph: Prenatal and early postnatal intoxication by inorganic mercury resulting from the maternal use of mercury containing soap. Human Toxicol 1987; 6:253-256.

Lauwerys R, Roels H, & Genet P: Fertility of male workers exposed to mercury vapor or to manganese dust: a questionnaire study. Am J Ind Med 1985; 7:171-176.

Lauwerys R: Environ Res 1978; 15:278-289.

Lauwerys RL, Bernard A, & Roels H: Anti-laminin antibodies in workers exposed to mercury vapour. Toxicol Lett 1983; 17:113-116.

Lee IP & Dixon RL: Effects of mercury on spermatogenesis studied by velocity sedimentation cell separation and serial mating. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1975; 194:171-181.

Levin M, Jacobs J, & Polos PG: Acute mercury poisoning and mercurial pneumonitis from gold ore purification. Chest 1988; 94:554-556.

Li AM, Chan MH, Leung TF, et al: Mercury intoxication presenting with tics. Arch Dis Child 2000; 83(2):174-175.

Liang L, Bloom NS, & Horvat M: Simultaneous determination of mercury speciation in biological materials by GC/cvafs after ethylation and room-temperature precollection. Clin Chem 1994; 40:602-607.

Liang Y, Sun R, & Sun Y: Psychological effects of low exposure to mercury vapor: application of a computer-administered neurobehavioral evaluation system. Environ Res 1993; 60:320-327.

Lien DC, Todoruk DN, & Rajani HR: Accidental inhalation of mercury vapor: respiratory and toxicologic consequences. Can Med Assoc J 1983a; 129:591-595.

Lien DC, Todoruk DN, & Rajani HR: Accidental inhalation of mercury vapor: respiratory and toxicologic consequences. Canad Med Assoc J 1983; 129:591-595.

Linares A, Zarranz JJ, & Rodrigues-Alarcon J: Reversible cutis laxa due to maternal d-penicillamine treatment. Lancet 1979; 2:43.

Longcope WT, Luetscher JA, & Calkins E: Clinical uses of 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). XI the treatment of acute mercury poisoning by BAL. J Clin Investigation 1946; 25:557-567.

Lowenthal DT, Chardo F, & Reidenberg MM: Removal of mercury by peritoneal dialysis. Arch Int Med 1974; 134:139-141.

Lund ME, Clarkson TW, & Berlin M: Treatment of acute methylmercury ingestion by hemodialysis with N-acetylcysteine infusion and 2-3,dimercaptopropane sulfonate. Clin Tox 1984; 22:31-49.

Ly BT, Williams SR, & Clark RF: Mercuric oxide poisoning treated with whole-bowel irrigation and chelation therapy. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39(3):312-315.

MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.

MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.

Magos L: Effect of 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL) on urinary excretion and brain content of mercury. Br J Ind Med 1968; 25:152-154.

Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.

Marcus S, Okose P, & Jennis T: Untoward effects of oral dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment for lead poisoning (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:376.

Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.

Marinova: Prob Askush I Ginek 1973; 1:75.

Marsh DO, Clarkson TW, & Cox C: Fetal methylmercury poisoning. Relationship between concentration in single strands of maternal hair and child effects. Arch Neurol 1987; 44:1017-1022.

Mason HJ & Calder IM: The correction of urinary mercury concentrations in untimed, random urine samples. Occup Environ Med 1994; 51:287.

Mattison DR: Reproductive Toxicology, Alan R Liss, Inc, New York, NY, 1983, pp 259-281.

McFarland RB & Reigel H: J Occup Med 1978; 20:532-534.

McLauchlan GA: Acute mercury poisoning. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:110-112.

Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.

Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.

Moylan JA: Burn care after thermal injury. Top Emerg Med 1980; 2:39-52.

Murphy MJ, Culliford EJ, & Parsons V: A case of poisoning with mercuric chloride. Resuscitation 1979; 7:35-44.

NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.

NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.

NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.

NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.

NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.

Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.

National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.

National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.

National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.

National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.

National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.

Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.

Neilsen JB & Andersen O: Effect of four thio-containing chelators on disposition of orally administered mercuric chloride. Human Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:423-430.

Nelson LS: Copper. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1256-1265.

None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.

Nordberg GF & Skerfving S: Metabolism. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 29-91.

North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.

North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.

Obel N, Hansen B, & Christensen MM: Methyl mercury, mercuric chloride, and silver lactate decrease superoxide anion formation and chemotaxis in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol 1993; 12:361-364.

Oliveira DB, Foster G, & Savill J: Membranous nephropathy caused by mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63:303-304.

Osweiler GD & Hook BS: Mercury. In: JL Howard (Ed.): Current Veterinary Therapy: Food Animal Practice 2, W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp 440-442.

Pai P, Thomas S, Hoenich N, et al: Treatment of a case of severe mercuric salt overdose with DMPS (dimercapo-1-propane sulphonate) and continuous haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(11):1889-1890.

Palmer RB, Godwin DA, & McKinney PE: Transdermal kinetics of a mercurous chloride beauty cream: an in vitro human skin analysis. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38(7):701-707.

Panova Z & Ivanova S: Akush I Ginek 1976; 15:133-17.

Pesce AJ, Hanenson I, & Sethi K: B2 Microglobulinuria in a patient with nephrotoxicity secondary to mercuric chloride ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1977; 11:309-315.

Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.

Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.

Product Information: BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, dimercaprol intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per manufacurer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.

Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Ovation Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Deerfield, IL, 2005.

Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Lundbeck Inc. (per Manufacturer), Deerfield, IL, 2011.

Product Information: CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, penicillamine oral capsules. Merck & Co,Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2004.

Product Information: DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, penicillamine titratable oral tablets. Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Somerset, NJ, 2009.

Product Information: DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, (RS)-2,3-bis(sulphanyl)propane-1-sulphonic acid, sodium salt-monohydrate oral capsules. Heyl Chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH & Co., 2004.

Product Information: Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)propane-1-sulfonic acid intravenous intramuscular injection solution. Heyl Chem.-pharm. Fabrik (per manufacturer), Berlin, Germany, 2013.

RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1992; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.

RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.

Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.

River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.

Roberts JR: Minor burns (Pt II). Emerg Med Ambulatory Care News 1988; 10:4-5.

Robison SH: Mutat Res 1984; 131:172-181.

Rosa FW: Teratogen update: penicillamine. Teratology 1986; 33:127-131.

Rosenmann KD, Valciukas JA, & Glickman L: Sensitive indicators of inorganic mercury toxicity. Arch Environ Health 1986; 41:208-215.

Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.

Sallsten G, Barregard L, & Wikkelso C: Mercury and proteins in cerebrospinal fluid in subjects exposed to mercury vapor. Environ Res 1994; 65:195-206.

Sauder P, Livardjani F, & Jaeger A: Acute mercury chloride intoxication: effects of hemodialysis and plasma exchange on mercury kinetics. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:189-197.

Seidel J: Acute mercury poisoning after polyvinyl alcohol preservative ingestion. Pediatrics 1980; 66:132-143.

Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.

Sharma AK, Kapadia AG, & Fransis P: Reversible effects of mercuric chloride on reproductive organs of the male mouse. Reprod Toxicol 1996; 10:153-159.

Shenker BJ, Berthold P, & Rooney C: Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes. III. Alaterations in B-cell function and viability. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 1993; 15:87-112.

Sherlock J, Hislop J, & Newton D: Elevation of mercury in human blood from controlled chronic ingestion of methylmercury in fish. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3:117-131.

Shtenberg AI & Safronova AM: Vopr Pitan 1979; 5:53-57.

Singer AJ, Mofenson HC, & Caraccio TR: Mercuric chloride poisoning due to ingestion of a stool fixative. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:577-582.

Singer R, Valciukas JA, & Rosenman KD: Peripheral neurotoxicity in workers exposed to inorganic mercury compounds. Arch Environ Health 1987; 42:181-184.

Skerfving S & Vostal J: Symptoms and signs of intoxication. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 93-107.

Smith PJ: Br J Ind Med 1983; 40:413-419.

Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.

Snodgrass W, Sullivan JB, & Rumack B: Mercury poisoning from home gold ore processing. JAMA 1981; 246:1929-1931.

Soleo L, Urbano ML, & Petrera V: Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on psychological performance. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:105-109.

Solomon L, Abrams G, & Dinner M: Neonatal abnormalities associated with d-penicillamine treatment during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:54.

Soo YO, Chow KM, Lam CW, et al: A whitened face woman with nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41(1):250-253.

Stack T, Bissenden JG, & Hoffman G: Mercuric chloride poisoning in a 23 month old child. Br Med J 1983; 287:1513.

Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.

Stewart WK, Guirgis HA, & Sanderson J: Urinary mercury excretion and proteinuria in pathology laboratory staff. Br J Ind Med 1977; 34:26-31.

Stremski E, Yousif J & Furbee B: Mercurous perhclorate burns producing elevated blood mercury (Hg) levels, treatment with dimercaptosuccinate (DMSA) (abstract). North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology-94, Salt Lake City, UT, Sept 23-36, 1994.

Sue Y: Mercury. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (EDS): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 5th ed, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1994, pp 1051-1062.

Suter KE: Mutat Res 1975; 30:365-374.

Suzuki T, Hongo T, & Matsuo N: An acute mercuric mercury poisoning:chemical speciation of hair mercury shows a peak of inorganic mercury value. Hum Exp Toxicol 1992; 11:53-57.

Tang HL, Chu KH, Mak YF, et al: Minimal change disease following exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Hong Kong Med J 2006; 12(4):316-318.

Tang HL, Mak YF, Chu KH, et al: Minimal change disease caused by exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream: a report of 4 cases. Clin Nephrol 2013; 79(4):326-329.

Temesvari E & Daroczy J: Histological examination of immediate and delayed contact allergy provoked by mercuric chloride. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21:271-272.

Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.

Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.

Toet AE, Vandijk A, & Savelkoul TJF: Mercury kinetics in a case of severe mercuric chloride poisoning treated with dimercapto-1-propane sulphonate (DMPS). Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13(1):11-16.

Toet AE, van Dijk A, & Savelkoul TJF: A case of severe mercury chloride poisoning treated with dimercapto-1-propane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 14.

Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.

Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.

Tsuchiya H, Mitani K, & Dodama K: Placental transfer of heavy metals in normal pregnant Japanese women. Arch Environ Health 1984; 39:11-17.

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Mercury compounds. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/mercury.html. As accessed 2011-05-03.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.

U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.

U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.

US DHHS: Mercury Toxicity, Monograph 17. ATSDR Case Studies in Environmental Medicine, 1992.

US DHHS: Toxicological profile for mercury (update). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1994.

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.

Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.

Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.

Van Tittelboom T, Mostin M, & Govaerts-Lepicard M: A propos de deux cas d'intoxication a la pommade mercurielle. J Toxicol Clin Exp 1985; 5:185-193.

Vena GA, Foti C, & Grandolfo M: Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:214-216.

Verma S, Kumar R, Khadwal A, et al: Accidental inorganic mercury chloride poisoning in a 2-year old child. Indian J Pediatr 2010; Epub:Epub.

Verpooten GF, Nuyts GD, & Hoylaerts MF: Immunoassay in urine of a specific marker for proximal tubular S3 segment. Clin Chem 1992; 38:642-647.

Wang RY, Henry GC, & Fine J: Mercuric chloride poisonings from stool fixative ingestion (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:341.

Weinstein M & Bernstein S: Pink ladies: mercury poisoning in twin girls (letter). Canadian Med Assoc J 2003; 168(2):201.

Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.

Wiechelt-Butler R, Dean BS, & Krenzelok EP: Effective use of dimercaprol/N-acetylcysteine therapy in profound pediatric mercuric chloride poisoning (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:342.

Will VK, Burton BT, & Magnusson AR: Mercuric chloride: intravenous (IV) injection resulting in transient anuric renal failure (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:388.

Winek CL, Fochtman FW, & Bricker JD: Fatal mercuric chloride ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:261-266.

Winfield SA, Boyd ND, & Vimy MJ: Measurement of total mercury in biological specimens by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Clin Chem 1994; 40:206-210.

Winship KA: Toxicity of mercury and its inorganic salts. Adv Drug React 1985; 3:129-160.

Winstanley R, Patel I, & Fischer E: The determination of toxic metals in simulated stomach contents by energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis and a fatal case of mercury poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 1987; 35:181-187.

Woods JS, Martin MD, & Naleway CA: Urinary porphyrin profiles as a biomarker of mercury exposure: studies on dentists with occupational exposure to mercury vapor. J Toxicol Environ Health 1993; 235-246.

Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.

Yang JM, Jiang XZ, & Chen QY: The distribution of HgCl2 in rat body and its effects on fetus. Biomed Environ Sci 1996; 9:437-442.

Yeates KO & Mortensen ME: Acute and chronic neuropsychological consequences of mercury vapor poisoning in two early adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994; 16:209-222.

Yonaga T & Morita K: Comparison of the effect of N-(2,3-dimercaptopropyl) phthalamidic acid, DL-penicillamine and dimercaprol on the excretion and tissue retention of mercury in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1981; 57:197-207.

Yoshida M, Watanabe C, & Satoh H: Milk transfer and tissue uptake of mercury in suckling offspring after exposure of lactating maternal guinea pigs to inorganic or methylmercury. Arch Toxicol 1994; 68:174-178.

ZASUKHINA GD: MUTAT RES 1983; 124:163-173.

Zalups RK, Gelein RM, & Cernichiari E: DMPS as a rescue agent for the nephropathy induced by mercuric chloride. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991; 256:1-10.

Zhang L, Liu F, Peng Y, et al: Nephrotic syndrome of minimal change disease following exposure to mercury-containing skin-lightening cream. Ann Saudi Med 2014; 34(3):257-261.

Zwiener RJ, Kurt TL, & Ghali F: Potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in a child with mercury poisoning. J Ped Gastro Nutrition 1994; 19:242-245.

FeedBack

MERCURY, INORGANIC

Classification | Information to evaluate chemical incidents

Information to evaluate chemical incidents

Information to evaluate chemical incidents

Information to evaluate chemical incidents