MOBILE VIEW  | 

MERCURY, INORGANIC

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) INORGANIC MERCURY
    1) Many forms of mercury exist. These major forms can be classified as elemental mercury, inorganic mercury, and organic mercury. This document generally concerns inorganic mercury.
    a) Certain inorganic mercury compounds have been used as topical antiseptics and disinfectants. Veterinarians have used these compounds as caustics, antiseptics, and disinfectants (Budavari, 1989). Many therapeutic uses of inorganic mercury have been discontinued(Klaassen, 1990).
    b) Certain inorganic mercury compounds are HIGHLY TOXIC and CORROSIVE. Mercuric salts are generally more toxic and more irritating than mercurous salts. KEY ACUTE EFFECTS involve the KIDNEYS and GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT, with key secondary effects involving the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. Other adverse effects may occur (US DHHS, 1992).

Specific Substances

    A) Mercuric Chloride
    1) Corrosive Mercury Chloride
    2) Corrosive Sublimate
    3) Mercury Bichloride
    4) Mercury Perchloride
    5) Sublimate
    6) CAS 7487-94-7
    Mercuric cyanide
    1) Cianurina
    2) CAS 592-04-1
    Mercuric Iodide
    1) Mercury Biniodide
    2) Mercuric Iodide, Red
    3) CAS 7774-29-0
    Mercuric nitrate
    1) Mercury pernitrate
    2) CAS 24670-15-3
    Mercuric Oxide, Red
    1) Red Precipitate
    2) CAS 21908-53-2
    Mercuric Oxide, Yellow
    1) Yellow Precipitate
    2) CAS 21908-53-2
    Mercuric Sulfide
    1) Artificial Cinnabar
    2) Chinese Vermilion
    3) Chinese Red
    4) C.I. Pigment Red 106
    5) C.I. 77766
    6) Mercuric Sulfide, Red
    7) Quicksilver Vermilion
    8) Red Mercury Sulfide
    9) Red Mercury Sulfuret
    10) Vermillion
    11) CAS 1344-48-5
    Mercurous Chloride
    1) Calomel
    2) Crema de Belleza--Manning (contains calomel)
    3) Mercury Chloride, Mild
    4) Mercury Monochloride
    5) Mercury Protochloride
    6) Mercury Subchloride
    7) Precipite Blanc
    8) Qing Fen (contains calomel)
    9) Tse Koo Choy (contains calomel)
    10) CAS 10112-91-1
    Mercurous Nitrate
    1) Mercury protonitrate
    Mercurous oxide
    1) Mercury oxide black
    Mercury, Ammoniated
    1) Aminomercuric Chloride
    2) Ammonobasic Mercuric Chloride
    3) Mercuric Chloride, Ammoniated
    4) Mercury Amine Chloride
    5) Mercury Ammonium Chloride
    6) Mercury Cosmetic
    7) White Mercuric Precipitate
    8) White Precipitate
    9) White Precipitate, Fusible
    10) CAS 10124-48-8
    GENERAL TERMS
    1) Inorganic Mercury
    2) Mercury Fulminate (Dry)
    REFERENCES
    1) (Klaassen, 1990; Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992); CDC, 1996)

    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) Hg

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Inorganic mercury exists in three oxidation states, as metallic (0), mercuric (+2), and as mercurous ions (Hg2+) which are usually dimers (IARC, 1993). Most of the inorganic mercury salts are crystals, granules or powders, which may be incorporated into other preparations.
    2) CHINESE HERBAL DRUGS: Chinese herbal patient medications are sold OTC, labeled in Chinese, and not regulated by the FDA. Two common mercury compounds found in these products are cinnabar (red mercuric sulfide) and calomel (mercurous chloride). Product names reported to result in mercury poisoning include Tse Koo Choy, Qing Fen, Zhu-Sha, and Chen-Fen (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992).
    B) USES
    1) Common mercury salts include mercury II (mercuric) chloride (corrosive sublimate), mercury I (mercurous) chloride (calomel), mercury II oxide, mercury II iodide, and mercury II sulfide (cinnabar). Mercuric chloride is used as a disinfectant and pesticide. In the past, inorganic mercury compounds were used as diuretics, antibacterials, antiseptics, ointments, laxatives, and antisyphilitic agents. Most of these products have now been discontinued (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007; Klaassen, 1990; US DHHS, 1992).
    2) SKIN-WHITENING CREAM
    a) Mercury-containing skin products are available in many developing countries (Chakera et al, 2011; Soo et al, 2003; Chan et al, 2001; Palmer et al, 2000). In one study, mercury content in unlabeled skin-lightening creams from Mexico ranged from 2% to 5.7% by weight (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012).
    b) MERCURY CONCENTRATION IN CREAM
    1) In one study, 8 of 38 brands of cosmetic cream purchased from Hong Kong and China had mercury contents exceeding 1 mcg/g, the recommended limit of the US Food and Drug Administration. In one case, the mercury content of an antifreckle cosmetic cream was 6.5% w/w (Chan et al, 2001).
    2) A woman developed nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous nephropathy after using a skin-whitening cream containing mercury (mercury concentration 1,762 ppm, almost 2000 times above the allowable limit) for 5 years (Soo et al, 2003).
    3) A woman developed nephrotic syndrome after using a mercury-containing facial cream (mercury concentrations of 30,000 ppm, reference level, less than 1 ppm) once daily for the past 4 month (Tang et al, 2006).
    4) Four patients developed minimal change disease after chronic exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Analysis of the facial creams revealed mercury content of 7420 to 30,000 ppm (Tang et al, 2013).
    3) STOOL FIXATIVE
    a) Mercury poisoning due to ingestion of stool fixative containing 4.5% of mercuric chloride (675 mg) and 5% of polyvinyl alcohol has been reported (Singer et al, 1994).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Common mercury salts include mercury II (mercuric) chloride (corrosive sublimate), mercury I (mercurous) chloride (calomel), mercury II oxide, mercury II iodide, and mercury II sulfide (cinnabar). Mercuric chloride is used as a disinfectant and pesticide. In the past, inorganic mercury compounds were used as diuretics, antibacterials, antiseptics, ointments, laxatives, and antisyphilitic agents. Most of these products have now been discontinued. Mercury poisoning due to ingestion of stool fixative containing 4.5% of mercuric chloride (675 mg) and 5% of polyvinyl alcohol has been reported. Skin lightening creams from Asia and Latin America and some Chinese herbal medicines have been found to contain inorganic mercury.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Inorganic mercurials have antiseptic properties though they are no longer formulated for therapeutic use.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Inorganic mercury causes caustic injury to the gastrointestinal tract and kidney tubules due to direct oxidative effects of mercury salts. Mercury ions bind to sulfhydryl groups and also have an affinity for phosphoryl, carboxyl, amide, and amine groups. The structure and function of key proteins and enzymes are disturbed, receptor affinities altered, and cellular metabolism impaired, among other effects. Mercury II chloride is considered more toxic that mercury I chloride.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Inorganic mercury exposure is uncommon and acute toxicity is rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are likely to be the first symptoms of acute inorganic mercury salt ingestion. Oropharyngeal burns may occur. Renal insufficiency may occur within 24 hours of exposure.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: GASTROINTESTINAL: Hemorrhagic gastroenteritis may occur due to the caustic effects of inorganic mercury salts on the gastrointestinal mucosa. Grayish discoloration of the mucosa and metallic taste may accompany caustic effects in the oropharynx. Massive fluid losses due to vomiting and diarrhea toxicity may lead to hypotension and shock over the first several days of poisoning. RENAL: In addition to caustic gastrointestinal effects, renal injury is the primary toxicity of inorganic mercury exposure. Acute tubular necrosis due to the oxidative effects of mercury salts may lead to renal failure. RESPIRATORY: Aspiration or inhalation of inorganic mercury can lead to pneumonitis and acute lung injury.
    3) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Gastrointestinal, renal, and neurologic symptoms predominate chronic inorganic mercury toxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms consist of abdominal pain, nausea, metallic taste, gingivostomatitis, loose teeth, and hypersalivation. Renal insufficiency due to acute tubular necrosis may occur. While inorganic mercury does not easily cross the blood brain barrier, long-term exposure may lead to conversion to organic mercury compounds which deposit into the CNS. Neurologic symptoms include tremor, neurasthenia, and withdrawn behavior (erethism). However, inorganic mercury exposure is unlikely to cause significant neurotoxicity. Chronic exposure to mercurial powders has led to acrodynia (Pink Disease), characterized by a morbilliform rash and erythematous edematous hyperkeratotic induration of the palms and soles associated with excessive sweating, tachycardia, photophobia, paraesthesias, and decreased reflexes.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Hypotension may occur.
    0.2.5) CARDIOVASCULAR
    A) Tachycardia, hypotension, hypovolemic shock and cardiovascular collapse can occur following ingestion of inorganic salts of mercury.
    0.2.6) RESPIRATORY
    A) Dyspnea, rales, and severe tracheal, laryngeal and pulmonary edema have occurred following ingestion and aspiration of inorganic mercury salts. Clinical findings similar to the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have also been reported.
    0.2.7) NEUROLOGIC
    A) Tremor, confusion, loss of coordination, hyperreflexia, and lethargy may follow acute mercuric chloride ingestion.
    B) Chronic exposure can cause fatigue, headache, weakness, decreased concentration, anxiety, emotional lability, irritability, delirium and neurocognitive impairment.
    0.2.8) GASTROINTESTINAL
    A) Inorganic mercury salts are corrosive. Gastritis, ulceration and necrosis of the gastrointestinal system can occur. Signs and symptoms include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysphagia, abdominal pain, hematemesis and hematochezia. Death due to fluid and blood loss may result.
    0.2.10) GENITOURINARY
    A) Proteinuria, anuria, hematuria and glycosuria may result from ingestion of lower concentrations of inorganic mercury salts, or as a result of dermal application of products which contain inorganic mercury salts.
    B) Acute renal failure and acute tubular necrosis may develop after ingestion of higher concentrations of inorganic mercury salts, and also as a result of injection or peritoneal exposure to these compounds.
    0.2.12) FLUID-ELECTROLYTE
    A) Severe fluid and electrolyte imbalances may occur secondary to GI losses after ingestion.
    0.2.13) HEMATOLOGIC
    A) There are limited reports of anemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation primarily secondary to the corrosive effects of these compounds.
    0.2.14) DERMATOLOGIC
    A) Mercury pigmentation, dermatitis and symptoms of acrodynia have resulted from use of creams containing inorganic mercury salts. Burns or irritation can result from some inorganic mercury compounds. Systemic toxicity resulted from chronic dermal absorption.
    0.2.15) MUSCULOSKELETAL
    A) Evidence of rhabdomyolysis was seen in a case of acute mercuric chloride ingestion. Muscular weakness occurs with chronic poisoning from inorganic mercurials.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Mercuric chloride has been associated with spontaneous abortions in humans. It has been embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic, and has affected the testes and sperm in rodents.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor serum electrolytes, CBC, renal function, and urine output.
    B) Spot urine mercury is useful as an initial screening test. Urine should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the reference laboratory. Ideally, patients should not consume fish for 1 week prior to urine testing. If a spot urine mercury level greater than 20 mcg/L is obtained, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained, again in a trace heavy metal free container. Urine mercury levels should be corrected for urine creatinine. Urine levels greater than 100 mcg/L are associated with overt neurologic symptoms.
    C) Whole blood inorganic mercury levels may be obtained in large acute exposures, but whole blood levels become unreliable as inorganic mercury redistribute into the tissues. Whole blood mercury should be speciated to determine the percentage of inorganic and organic mercury present. Whole blood inorganic mercury levels over 500 mcg/L are associated with acute tubular necrosis and renal insufficiency.
    D) There is no specific correlation between blood or urine mercury concentration and mercury toxicity.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Supportive care with intravenous fluid resuscitation for gastrointestinal losses and antiemetics for nausea and vomiting should be initiated following clinically significant acute ingestions. Chelation therapy should be given to patients with significant exposures.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Fluid resuscitation with isotonic fluids to replace gastrointestinal fluid losses and treat hypotension should be initiated immediately. When the patient is felt to be euvolemic, vasopressors can be added for persistent hypotension. Chelation therapy should be started as soon as possible.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Dermal exposures should be washed off with soap and water. Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not indicated.
    2) HOSPITAL: Inorganic mercury is poorly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract thus small ingestions do not warrant gastrointestinal decontamination. Large ingestions accompanied by poor gut motility that present early may benefit from activated charcoal and gastric lavage. Whole bowel irrigation may be necessary in patients with persistent radiographic evidence of mercury in the gastrointestinal tract.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Airway management may be necessary if a patient develops significant hypoxia due to pneumonitis or if the patient requires airway protection to facilitate endoscopic evaluation or gastrointestinal decontamination.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) CHELATION
    1) Parenteral chelation (intramuscular Dimercaprol (BAL) or intravenous unithiol) therapy should be initiated in patients with significant acute exposures (any patient with gastrointestinal symptoms after acute exposure or history of a deliberate or significant ingestion). BAL is given in decreasing doses over 10 days if the patient is unable to take oral medications. The dosing schedule is as follows: 5 mg/kg initially, followed by 2.5 mg/kg 1 or 2 times daily for 10 days. When the patient is able to tolerate oral medications, BAL can be replaced with succimer with no waiting period between treatments. Succimer may given based on the following dosing schedule: 1) 10 mg/kg orally 3 times daily for 5 days then 2) 10 mg/kg 2 times daily for 14 days. Succimer may be used alone in chronically exposed patients without gastrointestinal toxicity. Unithiol (2,3-dimercaptopropanol-sulfonic acid, DMPS) is available through compounding pharmacies in the United States. It is a water-soluble analog of BAL, and can be given orally or parenterally. It is considered a better mercury chelator than succimer. Unithiol is dosed as follows: IV: Day one 250 mg/kg every 3 to 4 hours, day two 250 mg every 4 to 6 hours, day three 250 mg every 6 to 8 hours, day four 250 mg every 8 to 12 hours, days five and six: 250 mg every 8 to 24 hours. ORAL: Initially 1200 mg to 2400 mg every 24 hours divided (100 mg or 200 mg every 2 hours), reduce to 100 mg to 300 mg every 8 hours as tolerated. Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route after the fifth day: 100 to 300 mg 3 times daily. Patients should be treated for 14 days or until there is no mercury detected in the urine.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) There is no role for hemodialysis or hemoperfusion in the elimination of inorganic mercury from the body. However, hemodialysis may be necessary due to renal failure.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic patients with small inadvertent exposures and without vomiting may be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with small exposures without significant caustic effects or gastrointestinal toxicity may be observed for 8 hours. If the patient can take oral food and fluids without discomfort, they have normal renal function and urinalysis at the end of observation, then they may be discharged.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Any patients with vomiting or diarrhea, caustic effects from ingestion, renal insufficiency, or other systemic toxicity should be admitted to the hospital for toxicology consultation and evaluation for chelation.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Patients with presumed gastrointestinal caustic injury should be evaluated by a gastroenterologist for endoscopic evaluation of the injuries. A toxicologist should be consulted in cases of acute ingestion, or cases in which the patient has developed renal insufficiency, caustic injury, or other systemic manifestation felt to be secondary to inorganic mercury.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) Insufficient fluid resuscitation can result in progression to multi-organ dysfunction. Failure to identify the source of mercury exposure may lead to on-going exposure. If patients are not chelated expeditiously when significant exposure has occurred, renal failure will ensue. Early chelation may prevent or minimize renal injury.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Inorganic mercury is primarily absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract; expected absorption is only 10% of the ingested dose. Dermal absorption is possible. It is usually due to chronic exposure and is facilitated by high mercury concentration, exposure to excoriated or damaged dermis, and high lipid solubility of the carrier. Significant inhalational exposure is rare but possible. Inorganic mercury is primarily excreted through the kidneys though diffusion into the gastrointestinal tract does contribute to body elimination. The half-life of inorganic mercury is estimated to be 30 to 60 days.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Arsenic may cause a similar caustic gastroenteritis accompanied by renal injury. Other caustic ingestions should be considered. Methylxanthines (caffeine or theophylline) cause a presentation with profound gastroenteritis though these patients will often have seizures and hypokalemia. Renal insufficiency is not expected in methylxanthine toxicity unless large fluid losses lead to a pre-renal acute tubular necrosis. Very large non-steroidal anti-inflammatory overdoses may lead to significant gastrointestinal toxicity, renal insufficiency, and acidosis. Infectious gastroenteritis may cause enough fluid loss to cause an acute tubular necrosis due to hypovolemia.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Bronchodilators and oxygen therapy should be provided to patients with bronchospasm or pneumonitis.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) Gross removal of salts and foreign bodies from conjunctiva should be attempted with a moistened Q-tip. Do no wipe cornea directly with Q-tip due to the risk of corneal abrasion. Irrigation with isotonic fluid 1 to 2 Liters should be performed to remove smaller debris and normalize pH.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) Decontaminate with soap and water. Treat caustic injuries with topical wound care ointments, such as 1% silver sulfadiazine cream (silvadene).
    2) Take precautions to avoid exposure of health care professionals and other individuals.
    3) Initiate chelation therapy in patients with systemic effects

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Mercury I chloride is one of the most toxic inorganic mercury salts. Fatalities have occurred from exposure to as little as 0.5 g. The more commonly reported estimated lethal dose of ingested mercury I chloride in an adult is 1 to 2 grams or 10 to 42 mg mercury/kg. For most inorganic mercury compounds, the acute lethal dose for a 70 kg adult is 1 to 4 grams or 14 to 57 mg/kg. There is insufficient data to quantify the amount of inorganic mercury associated with chronic toxicity. Chronic dermal can produce systemic toxicity.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Common mercury salts include mercury II (mercuric) chloride (corrosive sublimate), mercury I (mercurous) chloride (calomel), mercury II oxide, mercury II iodide, and mercury II sulfide (cinnabar). Mercuric chloride is used as a disinfectant and pesticide. In the past, inorganic mercury compounds were used as diuretics, antibacterials, antiseptics, ointments, laxatives, and antisyphilitic agents. Most of these products have now been discontinued. Mercury poisoning due to ingestion of stool fixative containing 4.5% of mercuric chloride (675 mg) and 5% of polyvinyl alcohol has been reported. Skin lightening creams from Asia and Latin America and some Chinese herbal medicines have been found to contain inorganic mercury.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Inorganic mercurials have antiseptic properties though they are no longer formulated for therapeutic use.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Inorganic mercury causes caustic injury to the gastrointestinal tract and kidney tubules due to direct oxidative effects of mercury salts. Mercury ions bind to sulfhydryl groups and also have an affinity for phosphoryl, carboxyl, amide, and amine groups. The structure and function of key proteins and enzymes are disturbed, receptor affinities altered, and cellular metabolism impaired, among other effects. Mercury II chloride is considered more toxic that mercury I chloride.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Inorganic mercury exposure is uncommon and acute toxicity is rare.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are likely to be the first symptoms of acute inorganic mercury salt ingestion. Oropharyngeal burns may occur. Renal insufficiency may occur within 24 hours of exposure.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: GASTROINTESTINAL: Hemorrhagic gastroenteritis may occur due to the caustic effects of inorganic mercury salts on the gastrointestinal mucosa. Grayish discoloration of the mucosa and metallic taste may accompany caustic effects in the oropharynx. Massive fluid losses due to vomiting and diarrhea toxicity may lead to hypotension and shock over the first several days of poisoning. RENAL: In addition to caustic gastrointestinal effects, renal injury is the primary toxicity of inorganic mercury exposure. Acute tubular necrosis due to the oxidative effects of mercury salts may lead to renal failure. RESPIRATORY: Aspiration or inhalation of inorganic mercury can lead to pneumonitis and acute lung injury.
    3) CHRONIC TOXICITY: Gastrointestinal, renal, and neurologic symptoms predominate chronic inorganic mercury toxicity. Gastrointestinal symptoms consist of abdominal pain, nausea, metallic taste, gingivostomatitis, loose teeth, and hypersalivation. Renal insufficiency due to acute tubular necrosis may occur. While inorganic mercury does not easily cross the blood brain barrier, long-term exposure may lead to conversion to organic mercury compounds which deposit into the CNS. Neurologic symptoms include tremor, neurasthenia, and withdrawn behavior (erethism). However, inorganic mercury exposure is unlikely to cause significant neurotoxicity. Chronic exposure to mercurial powders has led to acrodynia (Pink Disease), characterized by a morbilliform rash and erythematous edematous hyperkeratotic induration of the palms and soles associated with excessive sweating, tachycardia, photophobia, paraesthesias, and decreased reflexes.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Hypotension may occur.
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) HYPOTENSION
    1) Hypovolemic shock with severe hypotension may occur after ingestion of inorganic mercury salts (Sauder et al, 1988; Giunta et al, 1983).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) DIRECT EFFECTS
    1) Eye contact with inorganic mercury salts or concentrated solutions of these salts may cause ocular burns and severe eye injury. Long term exposure may result in discoloration of the lens and cornea (mercurialentis) without visual impairment (Grant, 1986). Mercurialentis is a sign of exposure and not of toxicity.
    B) SYSTEMIC EFFECTS
    1) Eye effects secondary to systemic intoxication from inorganic mercury are uncommon. Eyelid tremors due to the neurotoxic effects of mercury have been reported, but are more frequently associated with exposure to methyl mercury or other organic compounds (Grant, 1986).
    2) Decreased visual acuity (20/60 OD; 20/200 OS) was reported in a man 2 years after swallowing a 0.5 g tablet of mercuric chloride. Physical findings included white areas in the fundi, with patches of degeneration near the optic disc (Grant, 1986).
    a) No baseline eye or visual acuity examination results were reported in the citation. The individual's vision was assumed to be normal before ingestion of the tablet.
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Gum swelling and excessive salivation may occur with less serious exposures. Mercuric chloride is corrosive and can cause injury to the oral mucosa (Gerstner & Huff, 1977), larynx and trachea (Murphy et al, 1979).
    B) GUM EDEMA, SALIVATION
    1) Use of mercurous chloride in the 1950's for the treatment of constipation, teething pain, and worms resulted in erythema and edema of the gums and excessive salivation (US DHHS, 1994).
    2) Excessive salivation and gingivitis occur with chronic poisoning from inorganic mercurials (HSDB, 1990; (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992).
    C) CORROSIVE INJURY
    1) The oral mucosa may have an ashen gray appearance due to precipitation of mucosal proteins (Winship, 1985). Salivation may be increased (Gerstner & Huff, 1977). Blisters and ulcers may develop on the lips and tongue (US DHHS, 1994).
    2) Oral and esophageal burns may be present (Debray et al, 1979; Singer et al, 1994). Severe tracheal and laryngeal edema may occur (Murphy et al, 1979).
    3) CASE REPORT: Blisters and ulcers on the lips and tongue developed in a 19-month-old child who had ingested mercuric chloride powder (US DHHS, 1994).
    4) CASE REPORT: Necrotic lesions of the mouth, esophagus and stomach occurred in an adult who had ingested 6 g of mercury chloride (Sauder et al, 1988). Artificial ventilation was required.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.1) SUMMARY
    A) Tachycardia, hypotension, hypovolemic shock and cardiovascular collapse can occur following ingestion of inorganic salts of mercury.
    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Massive gastrointestinal blood and fluid loss following mercuric chloride ingestion can cause hypovolemic shock (Sauder et al, 1988; Giunta et al, 1983; Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; Toet et al, 1994). Death has resulted (US DHHS, 1994).
    B) TACHYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachycardia has been reported with inorganic mercury intoxication (Erkek et al, 2010; Verma et al, 2010).
    C) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypertension has been reported with inorganic mercury intoxication (Koh et al, 2009; Erkek et al, 2010).
    b) CASE REPORT: An 11-month-old boy presented with failure to thrive and developmental regression, irritability, painful, swollen, erythematous extremities, swollen fingers and toes, and hypertension (BP 140/100 mmHg). Laboratory results revealed a blood mercury concentration of 13.8 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 15.4 mcg/L), a urine mercury of 61.6 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 20 mcg/L), and urine mercury/creatinine ratio of 150 mcg/g creatinine (adult reference, less than 5 mcg/g creatinine). His pediatrician later reported a blood mercury concentration of 18 mcg/L and urine mercury/creatinine after a succimer challenge of 340 mcg/g. It was found that he was given a Chinese medicinal powder (mercury content, 1228 ppm) for 4 months (from 6 months to 10 months of age). Following treatment with one course of succimer 100 mg every 8 hours for 10 days and amlodipine 1.5 mg daily, his symptoms gradually resolved (Koh et al, 2009).

Respiratory

    3.6.1) SUMMARY
    A) Dyspnea, rales, and severe tracheal, laryngeal and pulmonary edema have occurred following ingestion and aspiration of inorganic mercury salts. Clinical findings similar to the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have also been reported.
    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) CASE REPORTS: Shortness of breath in an adult occurred following ingestion of 5 tablets of a Chinese medicine which contained an unknown concentration of mercurous chloride. Fine rales were reported in a 19-month-old child who had ingested mercuric chloride powder (US DHHS, 1994).
    2) Dyspnea has been reported following topical application of mercury-containing Chinese medicines, Jeu Wo Dan and/or Qing Fen (calomel); high mercury levels were present in the urine (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) CASE REPORT: Tracheal, laryngeal and pulmonary edema developed in a man following ingestion of an unknown amount of mercuric chloride (Murphy et al, 1979). A tracheotomy and artificial ventilation were required.
    2) CASE REPORT: An 87-year-old man developed acute lung injury (progressive dyspnea and acute respiratory failure) after mercury vapor inhalation from heating Chinese red (Cinnabar, mercury sulfide). Arterial blood gases showed a pH of 7.46, a PaO2 of 74.1 mmHg, and a PaCO2 of 34.7 mmHg. A chest radiograph showed bilateral infiltrates with right side predominance. His initial serum and urine mercury concentrations were 33 mcg/dL (normal less than 6 mcg/dL) and 0.87 mcg/dL (normal less than 5 mcg/dL), respectively. Despite supportive therapy and treatment with DMPS and penicillamine, he eventually died from profound hypoxemia 39 days after inhalation of the vapor (Ho et al, 2003).
    C) ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME
    1) CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old woman died 6 days after ingestion of 7 grams of mercuric chloride. Pulmonary aspiration occurred during gastric lavage. Changes consistent with ARDS were found at autopsy (McLauchlan, 1991).

Neurologic

    3.7.1) SUMMARY
    A) Tremor, confusion, loss of coordination, hyperreflexia, and lethargy may follow acute mercuric chloride ingestion.
    B) Chronic exposure can cause fatigue, headache, weakness, decreased concentration, anxiety, emotional lability, irritability, delirium and neurocognitive impairment.
    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TREMOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tremor has also been reported after inorganic mercury exposure (Erkek et al, 2010; Cordeiro et al, 2003; Garza-Ocanas et al, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORT: Tremor and loss of coordination developed 24 hours after mercuric chloride ingestion in one case (Giunta et al, 1983).
    c) Tremor developed in 2 of 12 patients following the use of a facial cream containing mercuric chloride (5.9%) from 2 to 10 years. Despite chelation therapy with DMPS, tremor persisted in one of the patients (Garza-Ocanas et al, 1997).
    B) CENTRAL STIMULANT ADVERSE REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperreflexia and CNS excitation may occur (Winship, 1985). Nervousness, irritability, anxiety, insomnia and personality changes can occur (Erkek et al, 2010; CDC, 1996; Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 5-year-old boy with recurrent oral ulceration developed motor and vocal tics after using a Chinese medicinal herb mouth spray (Watermelon Frost; mercury content, 878 ppm; 98% inorganic mercury and 2% methylmercury) up to 20 times a day for 4 weeks instead of the recommended dose of one spray twice daily. His blood mercury concentration was 83 nmol/L (normal for adults less than 50 nmol/L). Following the discontinuation of the mouth spray, his ticks resolved completely (Li et al, 2000).
    c) CASE REPORT: Emotional instability, insomnia, coarse tremors of hands, seizures, and a stroke developed in a 10-year-old girl approximately 2 weeks after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. She also developed gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal dysfunction, elevated liver enzymes, hemolytic anemia, tachycardia, hypertension, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    C) SECONDARY PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Peripheral neuropathy has been reported following long term dermal application of a 5% to 10% ammoniated mercury ointment for the treatment of psoriasis. The neurological symptoms included burning sensations on the soles of the feet, loss of sensation in the extremities, aching of the legs and feet, weakness and difficulty in raising one foot. Clinical observations included diffuse muscle weakness with bilateral sensory loss within the median nerve distribution, decreased vibration, absent joint proprioception sense, muscle wasting, unilateral foot drop, and weight loss. Sensorimotor defects were chiefly limited to one leg. There were no apparent central nervous system effects. Blood mercury levels were 128 mcg/L. The comparable dose of elemental mercury which was administered in the ointment over the 40 year period of application was approximately 1.5 to 2 kg. The neuropathy gradually improved after treatment with D-penicillamine (Kern et al, 1991).
    b) Paresthesias of the hands and feet, progressive weakness of the extremities, and/or delayed nerve conduction velocities were reported in 3 individuals who applied "Crema de Belleza-Manning" to the skin for 5 months to 10 years. Urine mercury levels confirmed mercury poisoning. Samples of Crema de Belleza contained 6% to 8% (by weight) mercury, as mercurous chloride or "calomel" (CDC, 1996).
    c) A neurological syndrome resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig disease) reportedly can occur from acute exposure to mercury and its salts (Adams et al, 1983). The peripheral effects involve a dying-back axonopathy, followed by demyelinization. General loss of brain function may also occur (FOLKL & KONIG, 1983).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old man, with a history of schizophrenia, presented with numbness of the distal limbs, generalized weakness and muscle wasting, which progressed to quadriparesis after drinking a traditional Chinese herb mixture (Huei Chen Shai) every day for 3 months. The mixture was prepared by mixing 200 gram of the herb with mercurial droplets from 10 broken thermometers in boiled water. Neurological examinations revealed diffuse muscle weakness and wasting in all limbs and sensory impairment including pin-prick, temperature, touch, vibration and position sensation in a glove and stocking pattern. In addition, tendon reflexes were absent in all limbs. Nerve conduction studies indicated a severe axonal polyneuropathy affecting both sensory and motor fibers. Sural nerve biopsy showed axonal degeneration with demyelination and a predominant loss of large myelinated fibers. The laboratory analysis of the herb drug showed mercury concentration of 10,000 ppm, lead 116 ppm, arsenic 18.9 ppm, and cadmium 0.97 ppm. Blood and urine mercury concentrations were not measured in acute stage until 2 months later; however, the concentrations of mercury in the scalp hair (14.2 mcg/g; reference, less than 5.5 mcg/g) and pubic hair (9.1 mcg/g; reference, less than 1.6 mcg/g) were high even 6 months later. Following supportive therapy, his muscle weakness improved slowly; however, at the 2-year follow-up examination, he still had sensory and motor impairment (Chu et al, 1998).
    D) AUTISTIC THINKING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Exposure to mercury at an early age is suggested as a possible factor in the reported increased rates of autism in the United States and the United Kingdom.
    1) A study performed by Holmes et al (Holmes et al, 2003), found that the levels of mercury measured in first baby haircuts of autistic children (0.47 ppm) were significantly lower (p < 0.0000004) than the hair level of mercury in the control group (3.63 ppm).
    2) The authors suggested that the reported increased rates of autism could be associated with increased exposure to mercury through thimersol-containing infant vaccines, dental amalgams or Rho D immunoglobulin injections that the mother received during pregnancy.
    3) The study found that mothers of autistic children had more exposures to mercury than the control mothers, yet the mercury level in the hair of autistic children was lower. They hypothesized that autistic infants retain mercury in tissue at a higher rate than control infants, thus potentially causing neurological damage at a sensitive time in infant brain development. Blood or urine mercury levels were not measured.
    E) DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    a) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old previously healthy male developed severe depression, along with loss of recent memory and insomnia following 6 months of daily contact with a metal containing mercury. Urine mercury level was 105 mg/L (normal 25 mg/L) at the time of exam (more than a year after ongoing exposure). Shortly after that level was obtained the patient was dismissed from work and had no healthcare benefits. Three years after exposure (mercury urine levels were normal) the patient continued to be depressed and improved with antidepressant therapy, but recent memory impairment and insomnia persisted. The authors suggested that neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with mercury poisoning may persist and are not limited to the immediate acute toxicity stage of exposure (Cordeiro et al, 2003).
    F) DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    a) CASE REPORT/ALTERNATIVE THERAPY: Irritability, weakness, anorexia, along with developmental regression occurred in previously healthy 20-month-old female twins who had been given a mercury containing "teething powder" (calomel) from India once or twice a week over a four month period. Both had reduced muscle strength and diminished reflexes. Before admission they had regressed developmentally and were no longer able to feed orally, sit or walk. Blood mercury levels were 176 and 209 mcmol/L (normally less than 18 mcmol/L), respectively. The toddlers were treated with succimer (DMSA) with only minor neurocognitive improvements; long term recovery was uncertain (Weinstein & Bernstein, 2003).
    b) CASE REPORT: An 11-month-old boy presented with failure to thrive and developmental regression, irritability, painful, swollen, erythematous extremities, swollen fingers and toes, and hypertension. Laboratory results revealed a blood mercury concentration of 13.8 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 15.4 mcg/L), a urine mercury of 61.6 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 20 mcg/L), and urine mercury/creatinine ratio of 150 mcg/g creatinine (adult reference, less than 5 mcg/g creatinine). His pediatrician later reported a blood mercury concentration of 18 mcg/L and urine mercury/creatinine after a succimer challenge of 340 mcg/g. It was found that he was given a Chinese medicinal powder (mercury content, 1228 ppm) for 4 months (from 6 months to 10 months of age). Following treatment with one course of succimer 100 mg every 8 hours for 10 days and amlodipine 1.5 mg daily, his symptoms gradually resolved (Koh et al, 2009).
    G) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures and a stroke developed in a 10-year-old girl approximately 2 weeks after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. An EEG revealed diffused slowing and an epileptogenic focus in the right parieto-occipital regin. A brain computerized tomography (CT) revealed bilateral fronto-parietal infarction and leukoencephalomalasia involving subcortical white matter tracts from left nucleus lentiformis to vertex. She also experienced hearing difficulty and her audiogram revealed bilateral, mild sensorineural hearing loss. Her hospital course was complicated by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal dysfunction, elevated liver enzymes, hemolytic anemia, tachycardia, hypertension, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    H) CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures and a stroke developed in a 10-year-old girl approximately 2 weeks after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. An EEG revealed diffused slowing and an epileptogenic focus in the right parieto-occipital regin. A brain computerized tomography (CT) revealed bilateral fronto-parietal infarction and leukoencephalomalasia involving subcortical white matter tracts from left nucleus lentiformis to vertex. She also experienced hearing difficulty and her audiogram revealed bilateral, mild sensorineural hearing loss. Her hospital course was complicated by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal dysfunction, elevated liver enzymes, hemolytic anemia, tachycardia, hypertension, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    I) ALTERED MENTAL STATUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) While inorganic mercury does not easily cross the blood brain barrier, long-term exposure may lead to conversion to organic mercury compounds which deposit into the CNS. Neurologic symptoms include tremor, neurasthenia, and withdrawn behavior (erethism). However, inorganic mercury exposure is unlikely to cause significant neurotoxicity.
    1) ORGANIC MERCURY: ERETHISM is a syndrome more often associated with chronic mercury exposure. Symptoms may include short term memory loss (Smith, 1983), personality changes, xenophobia, insomnia, impaired concentration, and irritability (Clarkson, 1990; Marsh et al, 1987).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.1) SUMMARY
    A) Inorganic mercury salts are corrosive. Gastritis, ulceration and necrosis of the gastrointestinal system can occur. Signs and symptoms include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysphagia, abdominal pain, hematemesis and hematochezia. Death due to fluid and blood loss may result.
    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTRITIS
    1) Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea are common following ingestion of mercury salts (Verma et al, 2010; Erkek et al, 2010; Seidel, 1980; Giunta et al, 1983; Wang et al, 1992; Budavari, 1989; Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992; Gricar et al, 1994; Kulling et al, 1995).
    2) CASE REPORT: Ingestion of 15 to 30 mL of stool fixatives containing mercuric chloride 4.5% and acetic acid 5% has resulted in salivation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and guaiac-positive stools (Wang et al, 1992).
    3) CASE REPORT: One study described an adult case of mercuric chloride ingestion which did not result in any apparent adverse effects. The patient was witnessed to have ingested a stool fixative which contained 4.5% mercuric chloride (675 mg), polyvinyl alcohol (5%), denatured alcohol (30%), acetic acid (4.5%) and glycerin (1.5%) . The patient vomited twice immediately after the ingestion, and was treated within 2 hours with dimercaprol and intravenous fluids. The serum and urinary mercury levels 2 hours post ingestion were 710 ng/L and 276 ug/L, respectively (Singer et al, 1994).
    4) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man presented with nausea, hematemesis and severe abdominal pain after ingesting 400 mg of mercuric salt. An endoscopy revealed acute necrotizing esophagitis and gastritis (Franco et al, 1997).
    B) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) Mercuric chloride is severely caustic. Dysphagia, hematemesis, melena and necrosis of gastrointestinal mucosa may develop after ingestion (Verma et al, 2010; Erkek et al, 2010; Giunta et al, 1983; Wang et al, 1992; Sauder et al, 1988; Toet et al, 1992; Toet et al, 1994; McLauchlan, 1991). The oral mucosa may have an ashen gray appearance due to precipitation of mucosal proteins (Winship, 1985).
    2) Endoscopy should be considered for evaluation of mucosal burns in patients with dysphagia, abdominal pain or evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding following ingestion of inorganic mercurials (Wang et al, 1992; Sauder et al, 1988).
    3) CASE REPORT: Accidental ingestion by a diabetic adult of 6 pills of mercury bichloride resulted in vomiting, hematemesis, hematuria, oliguria and melena. The patient was treated with gastric lavage. She died 3 days after admission. Esophageal erosions, stomach ulcerations, extensive necrotic colitis of the large intestine, nephrosis, fatty liver and pulmonary congestion were identified by autopsy (Jacobziner, 1963).
    4) CASE REPORT: Ulcerative lesions of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, with substantial bleeding and vomiting occurred in an adult following ingestion of an unknown amount of mercuric chloride in solution. Hypovolemic shock and acute renal failure developed. Intravenous DMPS, hemodialysis and transfusions were required (Toet et al, 1994).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INCREASED LIVER ENZYMES
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Elevated liver enzymes and abnormal renal function developed in a 10-year-old girl approximately 2 weeks after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. An abdominal ultrasound revealed diffuse hyperechogenic hepatomegaly with ascites and renal enlargement. She also developed gastrointestinal hemorrhage, emotional instability, sleeplessness, coarse tremors of hands, tachycardia, hypertension, hemolytic anemia, seizures, stroke, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).

Genitourinary

    3.10.1) SUMMARY
    A) Proteinuria, anuria, hematuria and glycosuria may result from ingestion of lower concentrations of inorganic mercury salts, or as a result of dermal application of products which contain inorganic mercury salts.
    B) Acute renal failure and acute tubular necrosis may develop after ingestion of higher concentrations of inorganic mercury salts, and also as a result of injection or peritoneal exposure to these compounds.
    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ALBUMINURIA
    1) Proteinuria, hematuria, glycosuria, and urinary casts have been reported in patients with less severe ingestions (Seidel, 1980; Pesce et al, 1977)
    2) CASE REPORT: Elevated concentrations of beta-2-microglobulin, a low molecular weight protein associated with proximal tubular dysfunction, was detected in the urine of one patient following mercuric chloride ingestion (Pesce et al, 1977).
    3) Slight, but not statistically significant, increased levels of N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase (NAG) in the urine of chloralkali workers compared to controls was reported in one study. Urinary mercury and NAG concentrations for the chloralkali workers were positively correlated (p< 0.001). There was no evidence of renal dysfunction among the workers based on monitoring of urinary albumin, orosomucoid, copper, creatinine, and beta(2)-microglobulin (Langworth et al, 1992).
    B) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) Acute renal failure often develops following inorganic mercury poisoning, including mercury chloride (Verma et al, 2010; Pai et al, 2000; Kulling et al, 1995; Singer et al, 1994; Toet et al, 1994; Agarwal et al, 1993; Wiechelt-Butler et al, 1993; Toet et al, 1992; McLauchlan, 1991; Sauder et al, 1988; Giunta et al, 1983; Murphy et al, 1979) and has been reported following ingestion of mercury oxycyanide (coingestants were nitric acid and ethylene glycol), possibly mercurous nitrate or mercuric nitrate (Debray et al, 1979), and mercury iodide (Kulling et al, 1995).
    2) Acute tubular necrosis may develop one day to two weeks after significant ingestions. Uremia and death may result (US DHHS, 1992).
    a) Clinical findings have included albuminuria, beta2 microglobulinuria, epithelial cell casts, hematuria, glycosuria, oliguria or anuria, and aminoaciduria (US DHHS, 1994). The onset is often within 24 hours of ingestion, but may be delayed.
    3) CASE REPORTS
    a) Non-oliguric renal failure developed in a 2-year-old boy 3 days after ingesting an unknown quantity of mercury chloride powder. Following supportive care, including IV BAL, he recovered gradually and was discharged after 2 weeks of hospitalization. His renal function was normal 2 months postingestion (Verma et al, 2010).
    b) Transient anuria and renal failure developed after intravenous injection of mercuric chloride (Will et al, 1991).
    c) In one case of acute mercuric chloride poisoning, the patient was oliguric for 12 days, followed by a diuretic phase, with recovery of renal function over the next 10 days (Chugh et al, 1978).
    d) Numerous cases of acute renal failure and other nephrotoxic effects of inorganic mercury compounds are reviewed by the US DHHS (1994) (US DHHS, 1994).
    e) A 39-year-old man developed two consecutive episodes of acute renal failure after ingesting 400 mg of mercuric salt, corrosive sublimate, in a suicide attempt. Initially, he presented with nausea, hematemesis, severe abdominal pain, and rash. He developed progressive oliguria and renal insufficiency within the first 2 days of ingestion. Following treatment with BAL and 10 hemodialysis sessions, he was discharged 22 days after admission with normal renal function. Approximately 7 days later, he presented with a temperature of 38 degrees C, a generalized morbilliform rash, pruritus and progressive oliguria. He underwent hemodialysis 6 days after admission. Following renal biopsy on day 35, histological findings confirmed the diagnosis of allergic granulomatous interstitial nephritis. Following treatment with prednisone, a marked improvement in his symptoms and renal function was observed. He was discharged on day 48 (Franco et al, 1997).
    C) NEPHROTIC SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Membranous glomerulonephropathy with nephrotic syndrome has been associated with the chronic use of mercury-containing skin creams (Chakera et al, 2011; Soo et al, 2003; Oliveira et al, 1987; Jeddeloh et al, 1985).
    b) Nephrotic syndrome of minimal change disease following exposure to mercury-containing skin-lightening cream has been reported (Zhang et al, 2014; Tang et al, 2013; Tang et al, 2006).
    c) CASE SERIES: Four patients developed minimal change disease after chronic exposure (2 to 6 months) to mercury-containing skin lightening cream. All patients presented with nephrotic syndrome and heavy proteinuria. Laboratory analysis revealed blood and urine mercury concentrations of 26 to 129 nmol/L and 316 to 2521 nmol/day, respectively. Analysis of the facial creams revealed mercury content of 7420 to 30,000 ppm. Following chelation therapy with D-penicillamine, all patients recovered gradually, with blood mercury concentration normalizing 1 to 7 months later and urine mercury concentration normalizing 9 to 16 months later (Tang et al, 2013).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old woman developed nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous nephropathy (serum creatinine, 0.63 mg/dL (56 mcmol/L), serum albumin 16 g/L, proteinuria 4.9 g/day) after using a skin-whitening cream containing mercury for 5 years. Mercury concentration in a cream sample was 1762 ppm, almost 2000 times above the allowable limit. Renal biopsy revealed minor glomerular abnormality under light microscopy, granular deposition of IgG and C3 along capillary wall under immunofluorescence examination, and small scattered subepithelial electron deposits under electron microscopy. Her blood mercury and 24-hour urinary mercury excretion concentrations were 163 nmol/L (normal, less than 50 nmol/L) and 754.6 nmol/d (normal, below 10 nmol/d), respectively. Following supportive therapy, her symptoms resolved gradually (Soo et al, 2003).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old woman developed nephrotic syndrome after using a mercury-containing facial cream (mercury concentrations of 30,000 ppm, reference level, less than 1 ppm) once daily for the past 4 month. Laboratory results revealed serum creatinine of 52 mcmol/L (creatinine clearance of 114 mL/min), urea 3.9 mmol/L, 24-hour urine protein excretion of 8.35 g, blood mercury level of 124 nmol/L (reference level, less than 50 nmol/L), and urine mercury of 287 nmol/L (reference level, less than 50 nmol/L). The pathological diagnosis of minimal change disease was confirmed by light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy findings (Tang et al, 2006).
    f) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) after using mercury-containing facial creams. The first patient, a 44-year-old woman, presented with peripheral edema, an albumin of 32 g/L, a plasma creatinine of 95 mcmol/L, and a urine protein-creatinine ratio of 1419 mg/mmol (normal, less than 30). Elevated serum (150 nmol/L; normal less than 30) and urine (16.5 nmol/mmol; normal, less than 5.5) mercury concentrations were observed. Although her blood and urine mercury concentrations decreased after the discontinuation of the cream, her renal function deteriorated and remained impaired (serum creatinine of 136 mcmol/L). The second patient, a 26-year-old woman, presented with peripheral and periorbital edema and heavy proteinuria. Laboratory results revealed albumin 28 g/L, proteinuria of greater than 9 g/day, and normal renal function (creatinine 62 mcmol/L). A renal biopsy showed MGN. Blood mercury concentration was 233 nmol/L (normal less than 30) and urinary mercury-creatinine ratio was 77.5 nmol/mmol (normal, less than 5.5). Although her nephrotic syndrome improved after the discontinuation of the cream, she continued to have proteinuria (urinary protein: creatinine ratio 238 mg/mmol). Although an antibody with specificity for the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) has been identified in greater than 70% of patients with idiopathic MGN, these antibodies were not present in these patients (Chakera et al, 2011).

Hematologic

    3.13.1) SUMMARY
    A) There are limited reports of anemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation primarily secondary to the corrosive effects of these compounds.
    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANEMIA
    1) ANEMIA may develop secondary to gastrointestinal hemorrhage (Murphy et al, 1979).
    B) HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Approximately a week after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury, hemolytic anemia occurred in a 10-year-old girl who also developed gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal dysfunction, elevated liver enzymes, tachycardia, hypertension, seizures, stroke, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    C) DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION
    1) CASE REPORT: Disseminated intravascular coagulation was reported in one patient following severe mercuric chloride poisoning (Murphy et al, 1979).

Dermatologic

    3.14.1) SUMMARY
    A) Mercury pigmentation, dermatitis and symptoms of acrodynia have resulted from use of creams containing inorganic mercury salts. Burns or irritation can result from some inorganic mercury compounds. Systemic toxicity resulted from chronic dermal absorption.
    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) Blue-black pigmentation of the face developed after long term topical use of a cosmetic cream containing 17.5% mercuric ammonium chloride (Dyall-Smith & Scurry, 1990).
    B) CONTACT DERMATITIS
    1) Immediate and delayed contact allergy characterized by pruritus and urticaria followed by eczema resulted from application of a 0.03% mercuric chloride solution (Temesvari & Daroczy, 1989).
    2) One study described 9 cases of dermatitis which developed 8 to 10 days after the topical use of an antiparasitic powder which contained ammoniated (11.2 g %) and metallic elemental (4.2 g %) mercury. A positive skin test to ammoniated mercury was identified in all cases (Vena et al, 1994).
    3) Kanerva et al (1993) described a case involving a laboratory technician who developed severe dermatitis as a result of exposure to psoriasis ointments which contained mercury salts. A patch test was positive for ammoniated mercury (Kanerva et al, 1993).
    C) URTICARIA
    1) Hives developed in a woman following ingestion of a Chinese medicine which contained an unknown amount of mercurous chloride (US DHHS, 1994).
    D) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) Extensive skin burns resulted when mercurous perchlorate flasks exploded during handling by a chemist (Stremski E, Yousif J & Furbee B, 1994).
    E) SYSTEMIC DISEASE
    1) Chronic use of mercury-containing ointments has resulted in systemic mercury absorption and poisoning (Dyall-Smith & Scurry, 1990; Oliveira et al, 1987; Kern et al, 1991; Van Tittelboom et al, 1985; Jeddeloh et al, 1985; US DHHS, 1994).
    2) Acute systemic toxicity is more likely following use in children or on areas of broken skin (De Bont et al, 1986; Bourgeois et al, 1986).
    3) Systemic absorption of mercury occurred in a chemist who had dermal injury due to broken glass and burns from exploded flasks of mercurous perchlorate (Stremski E, Yousif J & Furbee B, 1994).
    4) ERYTHRODERMA
    a) Chronic exposure to mercurial powders has led to acrodynia (Pink Disease), characterized by a morbilliform rash and erythematous edematous hyperkeratotic induration of the palms and soles associated with excessive sweating, tachycardia, photophobia, paraesthesias, and decreased reflexes (Sue, 1994).
    b) Symptoms of acrodynia, including fever, redness of the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, itching, dermal swelling and desquamation, rashes and limb pain, have been reported in children who received mercurous chloride for constipation, worms or teething discomfort. Patch tests were negative in several of the children (US DHHS, 1994).
    c) CASE REPORT/ALTERNATIVE THERAPY: Acrodynia (papular rash along with swollen, red, desquamated and painful hands and feet) along with recent developmental regression occurred in healthy 20-month-old female twins who had been given a mercury containing "teething powder" (calomel) from India once or twice a week over a four month period. Blood mercury levels were 176 and 209 mcmol/L (normally less than 18 mcmol/L), respectively. The toddlers were treated with succimer (DMSA) with only minor neurocognitive improvements; long term recovery was uncertain (Weinstein & Bernstein, 2003).
    d) CASE REPORT: An 11-month-old boy presented with failure to thrive and developmental regression, irritability, painful, swollen, erythematous extremities, swollen fingers and toes, and hypertension (BP 140/100 mmHg). Laboratory results revealed a blood mercury concentration of 13.8 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 15.4 mcg/L), a urine mercury of 61.6 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 20 mcg/L), and urine mercury/creatinine ratio of 150 mcg/g creatinine (adult reference, less than 5 mcg/g creatinine). His pediatrician later reported a blood mercury concentration of 18 mcg/L and urine mercury/creatinine after a succimer challenge of 340 mcg/g. It was found that he was given a Chinese medicinal powder (mercury content, 1228 ppm) for 4 months (from 6 months to 10 months of age). Following treatment with one course of succimer 100 mg every 8 hours for 10 days and amlodipine 1.5 mg daily, his symptoms gradually resolved (Koh et al, 2009).
    F) ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Exanthem developed in 2 of 12 patients following the use of a facial cream containing mercuric chloride (5.9%) from 2 to 10 years. Following chelation therapy with DMPS, exanthem resolved completely (Garza-Ocanas et al, 1997).
    b) Rash developed in a 39-year-old man after ingesting 400 mg of mercuric salt, corrosive sublimate (Franco et al, 1997).
    c) CASE REPORT: Evanescent erythematous rash on extremities, dryness, and peeling of skin developed in a 10-year-old girl approximately 2 weeks after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. Her hospital course was complicated by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, abnormal renal function, hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes, emotional instability, sleeplessness, coarse tremors of hands, tachycardia, hypertension, seizures, stroke, and decreased left ventricular function. Following chelation therapy with succimer and BAL, she gradually recovered and was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    3.14.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IRRITATION
    a) Severe irritation was observed in the Standard Draize Test in the rabbit by skin and eye exposure to mercuric chloride (RTECS, 1990).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.1) SUMMARY
    A) Evidence of rhabdomyolysis was seen in a case of acute mercuric chloride ingestion. Muscular weakness occurs with chronic poisoning from inorganic mercurials.
    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) Rhabdomyolysis, as evidenced by elevated serum CPK, myoglobinuria, and pigment granular casts in the urine, was seen in a case of ingestion of approximately 2 grams of mercuric chloride (Chugh et al, 1978).
    B) INCREASED MUSCLE TONE
    1) Older publications have reported twitching and cramping of the legs and/or arms in a few children who were treated with mercurous chloride for constipation, worms or teething pain (US DHHS, 1994).
    2) Older publications have reported muscular cramps and weakness following chronic occupational exposure to inorganic mercury and elemental mercury (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972).
    3) Muscle cramps and weakness are likely to be secondary to nervous system effects (US DHHS, 1994).
    C) MUSCLE WEAKNESS
    1) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    a) Muscular weakness occurs with chronic exposure to inorganic mercurials (HSDB, 1990).
    b) CASE REPORT/ALTERNATIVE THERAPY: Weakness, anorexia and symptoms of acrodynia, along with developmental regression occurred in healthy 20-month-old female twins who had been given a mercury containing "teething powder" (calomel) from India once or twice a week over a four month period. Both had reduced muscle strength and diminished reflexes. Before admission they had regressed developmentally and were no longer able to feed orally, sit or walk. Blood mercury levels were 176 and 209 mcmol/L (normally less than 18 mcmol/L), respectively. The toddlers were treated with succimer (DMSA) with only minor neurocognitive improvements; long term recovery was uncertain (Weinstein & Bernstein, 2003).

Endocrine

    3.16.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) THYROID DISORDER
    a) Increased release of iodine, decreased serum levels of thyroid hormones, increased thyroid weight and increased or decreased iodine uptake have been reported following administration of mercuric chloride or mercuric sulfide by gavage to rats or mice over a period of 6 days to 40 days (US DHHS, 1994).
    b) Increased thyroid function, as measured by an increase in (131)I-release rate, was seen in rats given 3 mg of mercuric chloride orally for 6 days. A 40-day regimen of 2.5 mg increased (125)I uptake. Irreversible decrease in (131)I release rate was seen after administration of 100 ppm in the diet for 3 months (Goldman & Blackburn, 1979).
    2) ENDOCRINE DISORDER
    a) Administration of mercuric chloride in drinking water in concentrations of 0, 9, 18 or 36 mg/kg/day for 60 to 180 days resulted in increased adrenal and plasma cortisone levels in rats (US DHHS, 1994).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) IMMUNOGLOBULIN
    1) IMMUNOGLOBULIN EFFECTS: A study of chloralkali workers who were chronically exposed to low levels of inorganic mercury failed to find significant differences in serum concentrations of immunoglobulins IgA, IgG, and IgM among the workers, compared to controls (Langworth et al, 1992).
    a) No apparent effects on the serum concentrations of IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgE were detected as a result of low level exposure to mercury among workers in the chloralkali industry, fluorescent light bulb industry and dentistry (Langworth et al, 1992).
    b) No apparent differences in serum immunoglobulin levels among individuals who exhibited skin hypersensitivity to inorganic mercury as compared to controls were detected.
    2) Other studies have reported changes in immunoglobulins or other immunological profiles as a result of mercury exposure in humans (Bencko et al, 1990; Cardenas et al, 1993) Queiroz et al, 1994).
    B) AUTOANTIBODY
    1) Lauwerys et al (1983) reported increased autoantibodies to the glomerular basement membrane (alpha-GBMs) in the blood of workers exposed to mercury vapors. A later by Bernard et al (1987) did not confirm these results (Lauwerys et al, 1983).
    2) Ellingsen et al (1993) found no significant elevations of serum alpha-GBMs in chloralkali workers as compared to unexposed controls. The mean exposure period was 7.9 years, with cessation of exposure an average of 12.3 years before the study. The mean annual urinary mercury concentration among the workers was 531 nmol/l (Ellingsen et al, 1993).
    3) A study of chloralkali workers who were chronically exposed to low levels of inorganic mercury failed to find significant differences in serum concentrations of antiglomerular basement membrane and antilaminin antibodies among the workers, as compared to controls (Langworth et al, 1992).
    4) A study of workers exposed to low levels of mercury in the chloralkali industry, fluorescent light bulb industry and dentistry failed to detect elevated titers of autoantibodies against the glomeruli or glomerular basement membrane (Langworth et al, 1992a).
    C) CYTOKINE
    1) CYTOKINES: No significant increases in serum concentrations of Il-1, IL-6 or TNF(alpha) were detected in workers exposed to low levels of mercury in the chloralkali industry, fluorescent light bulb industry and dentistry. Elevated cytokines were detected in a few individuals who exhibited allergic hypersensitivity to mercury (Langworth et al, 1992a).
    D) ATYPICAL LYMPHOCYTES
    1) LYMPHOCYTE TRANSFORMATION TESTS (LTT) were negative using lymphocytes from workers occupationally exposed to low levels of mercury. Individuals who exhibited allergic hypersensitivity to mercury had positive LTT responses to mercuric chloride (Langworth et al, 1992a).
    2) B LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION AND VIABILITY: Shenker et al (1993) report decreased human B lymphocyte proliferation (with and without mitogen stimulation and monocytes) and inhibition of human lymphocyte synthesis of IgM and IgM as a result of in vitro exposure to mercuric chloride (0 to 1000 ng) or methyl mercuric chloride (0 to 100 ng).
    a) Expression of the low affinity IgE and transferrin receptors was decreased, but expression of CD69 was unaffected. Exposure to the mercury compounds for 24 hours significantly decreased B lymphocyte viability. Increased intracellular levels of calcium were detected. B cells were refractory to immunological effects with exposure to mercury beyond 48 hours.
    E) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) Studies concerning the immunological effects of mercury have been limited. Most studies have involved subjects who were chronically exposed to elemental mercury vapors, or who worked in the chloralkali industry where exposure to inorganic mercury salts and mercury vapors occurred.
    3.19.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDER
    a) Evidence of immunosuppression, immunostimulation, and the development of antibodies to renal antigens has been reported in animals. There are strain related differences in some of these immunotoxic responses, with some strains being sensitive to the effects of mercury, and other strains being resistant (Ellingsen et al, 1993) 1994; (Kosuda et al, 1993; Kosuda & Hosseinzadeh, 1994; Hultman & Johansson, 1991; US DHHS, 1994).
    b) PMN LEUKOCYTES: In vitro models have demonstrated that inorganic and organic mercury may hamper the bacteriotoxic capacity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Obel et al, 1993).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Mercuric chloride has been associated with spontaneous abortions in humans. It has been embryotoxic, fetotoxic, and teratogenic, and has affected the testes and sperm in rodents.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) HUMAN
    1) MERCURIC IODIDE - Slight renal tubular dysfunction, cataract, and anemia were seen in a 3-month-old boy whose mother had used a soap containing 1% mercuric iodide during gestation and lactation. Blood and urine iodine levels were elevated: 1.9 mcg/100 mL, and 274 mcg/g creatinine, respectively (Lauwerys et al, 1987).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) MERCURIC CHLORIDE
    a) Mercury is available to the fetus (Lauwerys, 1978; Tsuchiya et al, 1984; Lien et al, 1983; pp 505-509).
    b) Pre- and post-implantation mortality, extra embryonic structures, fetotoxicity, cytological changes in the embryo, fetal death, changes in weaning/lactation index and growth statistics, and specific developmental abnormalities in the musculoskeletal, blood, lymphatic and central nervous systems have been observed in the rat (RTECS , 2000).
    c) In the mouse, pre- and post-implantation mortality, fetotoxicity, cytological changes, fetal death, and specific developmental abnormalities including the musculoskeletal system and cytological changes have been observed. Toxic maternal effects on oogenesis and the uterus, cervix and vagina have been reported in the hamster (RTECS , 2000).
    d) Abnormal embryos, in proportion to the dose of mercuric chloride given in a single IV injection on day 0 of gestation, were seen in mice (Kajiwara & Inouye, 1986).
    e) Retarded fetal growth, chromosome aberrations, and abnormalities in the skeletal system were seen in fetal mice when the dams were exposed to mercuric chloride fumes at 0.02 to 2.1 mg/m(3) for 4H/D for 4 days, beginning at day 9 of gestation (HSDB , 2000).
    2) MERCURIC IODIDE
    a) Mercuric iodide has caused post-implantation mortality, fetal death, weakened the placenta, and been fetotoxic, but did not cause birth defects in rats exposed by inhalation (RTECS; (Barilyak, 1984; Govorunova, 1981; Ermachenko, 1982; Shtenberg & Safronova, 1979).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) All forms of mercury move freely across the placenta, and fetal concentrations are at least as high as those in the mother (HSDB , 2000).
    2) Mercuric chloride affected the placental syncytiotrophoblast microvillous membrane in humans (HSDB , 2000).
    3) CASE REPORT - Lien et al (1983) reported a case of acute mercury inhalation toxicity in a pregnant woman. Twenty-six days after the exposure the child was born without clinical abnormalities, but with serum blood levels comparable with the mother's (Lien et al, 1983a).
    4) Mercuric chloride induced aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase, quinone reductase, and catechol-amine-O-methyltransferase in explants of human placenta in vitro. The placental explants accumulated mercury in proportion to its concentration in the culture medium (Boadi et al, 1992).
    B) ABORTION
    1) Spontaneous abortion of the fetus and placenta occurred following ingestion of 30 mg mercury/kg in the 10th week of pregnancy. The abortion occurred 13 days after exposure, and in spite of gastric lavage and dimercaprol treatment (Afonso & de Alverez, 1960) reviewed in US DHHS). Increased spontaneous abortions, and menstrual dysfunction, have been reported in women exposed to mercury (Goncharuk, 1971; Panova & Ivanova, 1976; Goncharuk, 1977; Marinova, 1973).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Mercury is found in human breast milk (Mattison, 1983). Oral absorption of mercury is greater in infants than in adults (Barlow & Sullivan, 1982). A level of 4 mcg/L in breast milk is considered dangerous for infants (Mattison, 1983).
    2) Gonzalez et al (1985) report a correlation between total mercury concentrations measured in the hair of nursing neonates and their mothers to be significant (Gonzalez et al, 1985).
    3) In a study of 155 lactating Saudi mothers, the mean concentration of mercury in breast milk was 1.19 mcg/L (range, 0.012 to 6.44 mcg/L), with 57.4% (n=89) of mothers having mercury levels at or above 1 mcg/L, which is the background level for mercury in human milk. All mothers had total blood mercury concentrations below the US Environmental Protection Agency's maximum reference dose of 5.8 mcg/L. Mercury in breast milk was significantly correlated with mercury in maternal blood (p less than 0.001), suggesting efficient transfer of mercury from blood to milk. Measured as biomarkers of oxidative stress, urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with increasing levels of mercury in breast milk and urinary mercury levels in infants in a dose-related manner. Thus, the exposure to mercury in breastfed infants may induce oxidative stress and lead to pathogenesis of health problems, especially during neurodevelopment, in these infants (Al-Saleh et al, 2013).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Mercuric chloride was transferred to the breast milk of guinea pigs and dogs after a single maternal injection of 1 mg Hg/kg. Mercury levels were somewhat lower in breast milk than in maternal plasma, but there was good correlation (r = 0.934) (Yoshida et al, 1994).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Mercury and inorganic mercury compounds
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 3
    1) The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) PULMONARY CARCINOMA
    1) Borderline excess lung cancer incidence was seen in Norwegian chloralkali workers who had been exposed and monitored for mercury (Ellingsen et al, 1993).
    B) GASTRIC CARCINOMA
    1) Significantly increased incidence of mortality due to stomach cancer among men, and lung cancer among women was reported in a study of >1000 workers in the fur hat industry (Merler et al, 1994). Heavy exposure to mercury may have been confounded by exposure to other potentially carcinogenic agents (e.g. dyes, asbestos, arsenic).
    C) CARCINOMA
    1) Mercury is not listed as a carcinogen in the 8th Report on Carcinogens, a 1998 Report of the National Toxicology Program, a branch of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences that performs interagency government research and reviews on suspected chemicals. In addition, mercury is not mentioned in the reference text edited by Schottenfield and Fraumeni, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, l996.
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) NTP TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDY -
    a) CONCLUSIONS (Mercuric chloride) - Under the conditions of these 2-year gavage studies, there was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of mercuric chloride in male F344 rats based on the increased incidence of squamous cell papillomas of the forestomach.
    b) Marginally increased incidences of thyroid follicular cell adenomas and carcinomas may have been related to mercuric chloride exposure. There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of mercuric chloride in female F344 rats based on two squamous cell papillomas of the forestomach.
    c) There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of mercuric chloride in male B6C3F1 mice based on the occurrences of two renal tubule adenomas and one renal tubule adenocarcinoma. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of mercuric chloride in female B6C3F1 mice receiving 5 or 10 mg/kg.
    d) Reference: US DHHS, 1993
    2) LACK OF EFFECT
    a) Mercury at 5 ppm in the drinking water was not carcinogenic in mice (Schroeder & Mitchener, 1975), and mercury is generally not regarded as a carcinogen.

Genotoxicity

    A) The genetic effects of mercury has been studied in a variety of test systems. Mercuric ions can damage DNA, producing strand breaks in vitro (Robison, 1984). Mercury salts were not mutagenic in Salmonella (the Ames test) (Marzin & Phi, 1985; (ARLAUSKAS, 1985). Mercury compounds (not known if they were organic or inorganic) were positive in the B. subtilis rec assay, which provides a measure of DNA damage but not necessarily mutations (ZASUKHINA, 1983).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor serum electrolytes, CBC, renal function, and urine output.
    B) Spot urine mercury is useful as an initial screening test. Urine should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the reference laboratory. Ideally, patients should not consume fish for 1 week prior to urine testing. If a spot urine mercury level greater than 20 mcg/L is obtained, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained, again in a trace heavy metal free container. Urine mercury levels should be corrected for urine creatinine. Urine levels greater than 100 mcg/L are associated with overt neurologic symptoms.
    C) Whole blood inorganic mercury levels may be obtained in large acute exposures, but whole blood levels become unreliable as inorganic mercury redistribute into the tissues. Whole blood mercury should be speciated to determine the percentage of inorganic and organic mercury present. Whole blood inorganic mercury levels over 500 mcg/L are associated with acute tubular necrosis and renal insufficiency.
    D) There is no specific correlation between blood or urine mercury concentration and mercury toxicity.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Obtain whole blood mercury levels in acute exposures. Obtain baseline BUN, creatinine and electrolytes.
    2) Blood analysis is useful for identifying acute exposure (Barregard, 1993) and may reflect the body burden of methylmercury.
    3) LIMITATIONS: Commonly used clinical laboratory methods may not distinguish between inorganic and organic mercury in the blood (Knight, 1988).
    a) Blood analysis is useful only for detecting acute exposure immediately after it has occurred, since blood mercury levels rapidly decline after exposure. Whole blood mercury concentrations are most useful in cases of acute high dose exposure.
    b) Plasma mercury concentrations may be more useful for monitoring low level exposure (US DHHS, 1992).
    4) NORMAL WHOLE BLOOD MERCURY CONCENTRATION: Whole blood mercury levels rarely exceed 1.5 mcg/dL in unexposed individuals (US DHHS, 1992). In acute situations, elevation of blood-mercury level to ranges of 25 to 50 mcg/dL (1246.2 to 2492.5 nmol/L) precede elevations in urinary excretion because of the body's capacity to store mercury (Cherian, 1978).
    5) CONCENTRATION AT WHICH SYMPTOMS MAY OCCUR: Symptoms of toxicity may occur at blood mercury concentrations of 5 mcg/dL or greater. Symptoms do not always correlate with blood mercury levels.
    6) SEAFOOD: The use of blood mercury levels after acute exposure should be considered with the knowledge that a single seafood meal will elevate levels for 20 to 30 hours (Kershaw et al, 1980; Sherlock et al, 1984).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINARY LEVELS
    1) The following procedures should be ordered: a 24-hour urine collection for mercury, creatinine and urinalysis.
    2) URINARY MERCURY is the best biological marker for chronic elemental or inorganic mercury exposure. Urinary mercury concentrations are also useful for assessing the response to chelation therapy.
    3) NORMAL URINARY MERCURY CONCENTRATION: Urinary mercury concentrations in unexposed adults are usually less than 20 mcg/L (US DHHS, 1992).
    4) CONCENTRATION AT WHICH SYMPTOMS MAY OCCUR: Signs and symptoms of toxicity may begin to occur at urinary mercury concentrations of 20 to 100 mcg/L. However, urinary mercury levels often do not correlate with clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity.
    5) 24-HOUR URINE COLLECTION: There is a high degree of intraindividual variation in urine mercury levels. The averaging of several urinary mercury determinations may be required (Barregard, 1993). A 24-hour urine collection is recommended.
    a) Collection of a 24-hour urine sample, followed by challenge with D-penicillamine for 4 days, has been used to document mercury body burden (Ishihara et al, 1974).
    6) SPOT MERCURY LEVELS: A first morning void can be used to approximate a 24-hour urine collection if adjustments for the urine concentration are made by using specific gravity or amount of creatinine in the sample (US DHHS, 1992). Spot urine levels may be inconsistent due to diurnal variation. The interpretation of these levels is most accurate when samples are taken at the same time of day and are corrected for specific gravity and creatinine (US DHHS, 1992; Mason & Calder, 1994).
    a) Monitoring of spot urine mercury levels did correlate with occurrence of neuropsychological toxicity and motor nerve conduction velocity in 42 chronically exposed workers (Rosenmann et al, 1986).
    B) OTHER
    1) 24 HOUR URINARY DELTA AMINOLEVULINIC ACID (ALA) levels are elevated to 3 to 10 mg/L in chronic mercury poisoning cases. Although urinary levels as high as 2000 mcg/L have been seen without symptoms, behavioral and neurological evaluation should be performed if levels are greater than 100 mcg/L (Adams et al, 1983).
    2) Urinary measurements of proteins (Abdelmegid et al, 1993; Snodgrass et al, 1981; Rosenmann et al, 1986) Ehrenberg, 1991), porphyrin profiles (Woods et al, 1993), N-acetyl beta-glucosaminidase (NAG) and NAG isoenzymes (Rosenmann et al, 1986; Ellingsen et al, 1993), beta(2)-microglobulin (US DHHS, 1992), and intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Verpooten et al, 1992) have been used in attempts to identify early effects of organic or inorganic mercury exposure.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) OTHER
    a) TREMOR ANALYSIS: Clinically apparent tremors often occur with chronic mercury poisoning (Knight, 1988). One study described methods of measuring tremor frequency and other tremor characteristics which may enable identification of subtle neurological effects before clinical signs of poisoning are evident (Chapman et al, 1990).
    2) ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL TESTING
    a) Nerve conduction velocity studies have been used to evaluate mercury toxicity in workers chronically exposed to inorganic mercury (Singer et al, 1987).
    3) NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING
    a) Psychometric tests have been used to detect early toxic effects of organic and inorganic mercury exposure. Application of these test batteries in mercury exposures are described (Yeates & Mortensen, 1994; Liang et al, 1993; Langworth et al, 1992; Soleo et al, 1990).
    4) HAIR
    a) Longitudinal analysis of sections of hair from a patient who ingested mercuric chloride revealed a peak in inorganic mercury which corresponded with the time of ingestion (Suzuki et al, 1992).

Radiographic Studies

    A) ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
    1) Abdominal x-rays may help assess the adequacy of GI decontamination.

Methods

    A) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) Blood, urine and hair are most commonly analyzed for mercury content.
    2) The most reliable and common analytical method is cold vapor atomic absorption (IARC, 1993).
    a) One study described adaptation of a cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometric method, which enables detection of very low levels of total mercury, and can differentiate between inorganic and organic mercury (Winfield et al, 1994).
    b) Thin-layer and gas chromatographic methods can also distinguish between organic and inorganic mercury in biological samples (IARC, 1993; Sue, 1994).
    3) The neutron activation procedure for urinary mercury analysis is reported by the WHO as the most accurate and sensitive method for urinary analysis of mercury (IARC, 1993). Cold vapor atomic absorption is also commonly used. Urinary monitoring for methyl mercury exposure is not useful due to excretion principally via the fecal route.
    4) Atomic absorption, gas chromatography and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography can be used to speciate the type of mercury in biological samples (IARC, 1993). Other analytical methods typically used in quantitating mercury in biological tissues include neutron activation analysis, atomic fluorescence spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry, and spark source spectrometry (IARC, 1993).
    5) COLD VAPOR ATOMIC FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY reportedly is an accurate, reliable and sensitive method for determining total mercury concentrations in human breast milk, urine, monkey kidney tissue, and feces.
    a) This method is useful for monitoring chronic exposure to low levels of elemental mercury vapor, and can be adapted in order to differentiate organic mercury from inorganic mercury (Winfield et al, 1994).
    6) DISPERSIVE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (EDXRF) has been used to measure mercury in simulated stomach contents (Winstanley et al, 1987). The lower limit of detection was 10 mcg/mL. This method may not detect mercury at concentrations which are near the normal limits.
    7) RADIOCHEMICAL NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS has been used to measure mercury in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 10 subjects occupationally exposed to mercury vapors (Sallsten et al, 1994).
    a) The CSF mercury concentrations were very low, but correlated with plasma concentrations of mercury. The plasma concentrations of mercury appeared to provide a better indication of exposure than CSF mercury.
    8) SPECIATION: Some analytical methods do not distinguish between inorganic and organic mercury in biological samples (Knight, 1988). Winfield et al (1994) describe adaptation of a cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometric method, which enables detection of very low levels of total mercury, and can differentiate between inorganic and organic mercury.
    a) The IARC (1993) describes a dual-stage differential atomization atomic absorption technique which can speciate 10 mercury compounds, including mercuric chloride and mercuric acetate, in biological fluids.
    b) Simultaneous determination of inorganic, monomethyl, and total mercury can be accomplished in biological samples by digestion in methanolic potassium hydroxide, followed by ethylation and gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS). Limits of detection are 1.3 pg inorganic mercury and 0.6 pg monomethyl mercury (Liang et al, 1994).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any patients with vomiting or diarrhea, caustic effects from ingestion, renal insufficiency, or other systemic toxicity should be admitted to the hospital for toxicology consultation and evaluation for chelation.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic patients with small inadvertent exposures and without vomiting may be managed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with presumed gastrointestinal caustic injury should be evaluated by a gastroenterologist for endoscopic evaluation of the injuries. A toxicologist should be consulted in cases of acute ingestion, or cases in which the patient has developed renal insufficiency, caustic injury, or other systemic manifestation felt to be secondary to inorganic mercury.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with small exposures without significant caustic effects or gastrointestinal toxicity may be observed for 8 hours. If the patient can take oral food and fluids without discomfort, they have normal renal function and urinalysis at the end of observation, then they may be discharged.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor serum electrolytes, CBC, renal function, and urine output.
    B) Spot urine mercury is useful as an initial screening test. Urine should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the reference laboratory. Ideally, patients should not consume fish for 1 week prior to urine testing. If a spot urine mercury level greater than 20 mcg/L is obtained, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained, again in a trace heavy metal free container. Urine mercury levels should be corrected for urine creatinine. Urine levels greater than 100 mcg/L are associated with overt neurologic symptoms.
    C) Whole blood inorganic mercury levels may be obtained in large acute exposures, but whole blood levels become unreliable as inorganic mercury redistribute into the tissues. Whole blood mercury should be speciated to determine the percentage of inorganic and organic mercury present. Whole blood inorganic mercury levels over 500 mcg/L are associated with acute tubular necrosis and renal insufficiency.
    D) There is no specific correlation between blood or urine mercury concentration and mercury toxicity.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) PREHOSPITAL: Dermal exposures should be washed off with soap and water. Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not indicated.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Inorganic mercury is poorly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract thus small ingestions do not warrant gastrointestinal decontamination. Large ingestions accompanied by poor gut motility that present early may benefit from activated charcoal and gastric lavage. Whole bowel irrigation may be necessary in patients with persistent radiographic evidence of mercury in the gastrointestinal tract.
    B) Inorganic mercury salts may produce severe gastric erosion requiring gastrectomy (Sauder et al, 1988).
    C) Rapid gastric emptying should be considered to prevent serious systemic toxicity. The theoretical potential for GI perforation should be considered before stomach emptying procedures in patients presenting late after ingestion. Abdominal x-ray may be useful in evaluating the need for gastric lavage.
    D) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    E) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) CAUTION: Progressive pulmonary distress, leading to fatal cardiopulmonary arrest, was attributed to aspiration of mercury during unprotected gastric lavage following a large overdose of mercuric chloride. Elective tracheal intubation should be considered prior to performance of gastric lavage (McLauchlan, 1991).
    2) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    3) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    4) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    5) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    6) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    F) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) Consider whole bowel irrigation in patients at risk for poisoning after ingestion of inorganic mercury (large ingestion, prolonged retention, inflammation of the GI mucosa, known fistula etc).
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes, CBC, renal function, and urine output.
    2) Spot urine mercury is useful as an initial screening test. Urine should be collected in a trace heavy metal free container approved by the reference laboratory. Ideally, patients should not consume fish for 1 week prior to urine testing. If a spot urine mercury level greater than 20 mcg/L is obtained, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained, again in a trace heavy metal free container. Urine mercury levels should be corrected for urine creatinine. Urine levels greater than 100 mcg/L are associated with overt neurologic symptoms.
    3) Whole blood inorganic mercury levels may be obtained in large acute exposures, but whole blood levels become unreliable as inorganic mercury redistribute into the tissues. Whole blood mercury should be speciated to determine the percentage of inorganic and organic mercury present. Whole blood inorganic mercury levels over 500 mcg/L are associated with acute tubular necrosis and renal insufficiency.
    4) There is no specific correlation between blood or urine mercury concentration and mercury toxicity.
    B) CHELATION THERAPY
    1) Chelation should be performed with one of the following drugs in severe poisonings.
    2) In general, parenteral chelation therapy should be initiated in patients with significant acute exposures (any patient with gastrointestinal symptoms after acute exposure or history of a deliberate or significant ingestion). Either intramuscular dimercaprol (BAL) or intravenous unithiol can be used, depending on availability. When the patient is able to tolerate oral medications, BAL can be replaced with succimer with no waiting period between treatments. If unithiol is used, therapy may be changed to the oral route after the fifth day if the patient's condition permits.
    3) All of the effective complexing agents administered to facilitate removal of mercury from the body contain sulfhydryl groups (Clarkson, 1990).
    C) DIMERCAPROL
    1) DIMERCAPROL/BAL IN OIL: INDICATIONS: Used for the treatment of mercury (inorganic and elemental), arsenic, and gold poisoning. It is also used in combination with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection to treat patients with severe lead poisoning (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Dimercaprol is contraindicated in methyl mercury poisoning (Howland, 2002; Clarkson, 1990).
    2) MILD ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 2.5 mg/kg 4 times daily for 2 days, 2 times on the third day, and once daily thereafter for 10 days. SEVERE ARSENIC OR GOLD POISONING: DOSE: 3 mg/kg every 4 hours for 2 days, 4 times on the third day, then twice daily thereafter for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    3) MERCURY POISONING: DOSE: 5 mg/kg initially, then 2.5 mg/kg 1 or 2 times daily for 10 days. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008).
    4) ACUTE LEAD ENCEPHALOPATHY: DOSE: 4 mg/kg is given alone in the first dose and thereafter at 4-hour intervals with Edetate Calcium Disodium injection administered at a separate site. For less severe poisoning, dimercaprol dose can be decreased to 3 mg/kg after the first dose. Administered by deep intramuscular injection only. Continue the treatment for 2 to 7 days depending on clinical response (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Therapy is generally switched to a less toxic oral chelator as soon as tolerated.
    5) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Common effects include pain at the injection site and fever (especially in children). Other effects include hypertension, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, headache, burning sensations of the mouth and throat, a sensation of constriction in the throat, chest, or hands, conjunctivitis, lacrimation, salivation, tingling of the extremities, diaphoresis, abdominal pain, and anxiety. Dimercaprol injection contains peanut oil. Avoid in patients with peanut allergy (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). Adverse effects are dose related; they develop in 1% of patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, 14% of patients receiving 4 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours and 65% of patients receiving 5 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours (Eagle & Magnuson, 1946).
    6) PRECAUTIONS: It is generally contraindicated in patients with hepatic insufficiency, with the exception of postarsenical jaundice (Prod Info BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, 2008). May cause hemolysis in G6PD deficient patients. BAL metal chelate disassociates in acid environment; urinary alkalinization is usually recommended. Do not administer with iron therapy as BAL iron complex may cause vomiting (Howland, 2002).
    7) If the patient is severely symptomatic or cannot tolerate oral chelation. BAL therapy may be judiciously continued despite renal failure since a major fraction of this complex is excreted in bile and the BAL mercury complex is cleared by dialysis.
    8) EFFICACY
    a) BAL has been shown to increase mercury excretion in the urine, bile and feces, decrease the body burden of mercury, and decrease mortality in animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning (Neilsen & Andersen, 1991; Kojima et al, 1989; Aaseth et al, 1982; Yonaga & Morita, 1981; Magos, 1968). BAL increased distribution of mercury to the brain in some animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning (Neilsen & Andersen, 1991; Aaseth et al, 1982).
    b) BAL therapy in patients with acute inorganic mercury ingestion has been associated with clinical improvement or the failure to develop severe toxicity (Ly et al, 2002; Singer et al, 1994; Pesce et al, 1977; Longcope et al, 1946; Stack et al, 1983; Suzuki et al, 1992; Wang et al, 1992). Changes in mercury excretion were not evaluated in these cases.
    c) CASE REPORT: A 10-year-old girl with severe inorganic mercury poisoning (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal, hepatic, neurologic, hematologic, and cardiovascular dysfunctions) and a blood mercury concentration of 5,380 mcg/L and urine mercury of 91 mcg/L, was treated with succimer 17 days after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. A week after succimer was discontinued, her blood mercury level increased again and urine mercury level decreased. At this time, she was treated with BAL 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 6 hours for the first 2 days, 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 4 hours for the next 2 days, and then 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 12 hours for 7 days. Her symptoms improved gradually, and she was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    d) HEMODIALYSIS: The BAL mercury complex is cleared by hemodialysis (Guinta et al, 1983).
    e) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: BAL therapy and peritoneal dialysis was associated with mercury clearance rates of 0.57 to 2.38 mL/minute in an adult who developed acute renal failure after ingesting mercury bichloride (Lowenthal et al, 1974).
    1) Dialysate mercury concentrations without BAL therapy were undetectable in a child with renal failure after ingesting inorganic mercury. When BAL therapy was begun, dialysate mercury concentrations ranged form 2.9 to 33 micrograms/Liter (Kahn et al, 1977).
    9) LABORATORY
    a) Monitor urine mercury excretion during chelation therapy to assess the effects of therapy.
    D) SUCCIMER
    1) Succimer is an effective mercury chelator with minimal side effects (Clarkson, 1990; Graziano, 1986; Graziano et al, 1978; Graziano et al, 1985; Kosnett et al, 1989). It has been shown to increase urinary mercury excretion, decrease total body, brain and renal mercury levels, and decrease nephrotoxicity, in animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning (Gale et al, 1993; Neilsen & Andersen, 1991; Aaseth et al, 1982).
    2) SUCCIMER/DOSE/ADMINISTRATION
    a) PEDIATRIC: Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval is then increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless blood lead concentrations indicate the need for prompt retreatment.
    2) Succimer capsule contents may be administered mixed in a small amount of food (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) ADULT: Succimer is not FDA approved for use in adults, however it has been shown to be safe and effective when used to treat adults with poisoning from a variety of heavy metals (Fournier et al, 1988). Initial dose is 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    1) The dosing interval then is increased to every 12 hours for the next 14 days. A repeat course may be given if indicated by elevated blood levels. A minimum of 2 weeks between courses is recommended, unless the patient's symptoms or blood concentrations indicate a need for more prompt treatment (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    3) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) The manufacturer recommends monitoring liver enzymes and complete blood count with differential and platelet count prior to the start of therapy and at least weekly during therapy (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    b) Succimer therapy did not worsen preexisting borderline abnormal liver enzyme levels in a prospective evaluation of 15 children with lead poisoning (Kuntzelman & Angle, 1992).
    4) SUCCIMER/ADVERSE EFFECTS: The following adverse events have occurred in children and adults during clinical trials: nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; transient liver enzyme elevations; rash, pruritus; drowsiness and paresthesia. Events reported infrequently include: sore throat, rhinorrhea, mucosal vesicular eruption, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia, and mild to moderate neutropenia (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    5) ODOR: Succimer has a sulfurous odor that may be evident in the patient's breath or urine (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2005).
    6) HYPERTHERMIA: One adult developed acute severe hyperthermia associated with hypotension; rechallenge resulted in hyperthermia with shaking chills and hypertension (Marcus et al, 1991).
    7) AVAILABLE FORMS: Succimer (Chemet (R)), 100 mg capsules (Prod Info CHEMET(R) oral capsules, 2011).
    8) CASE REPORT: Blood mercury levels fell from 12.2 mcg/dL to 8 mcg/dL after 7 days of DMSA therapy (1 gram TID) in a 35-year-old man with mercurous perchlorate burns (Stremski E, Yousif J & Furbee B, 1994).
    9) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping after ingesting approximately 40 g of mercuric oxide. Abdominal radiograph showed densely radiopaque material in the stomach and intestines. He received extensive gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol solution (Golytely) for 24 hours. In addition, he received dimercaprol therapy (4 mg/kg IM first dose, then 3 mg/kg every 6 hours) starting 6 hours after exposure for 5 days, followed by succimer (10 mg/kg every 8 hours) for 10 days. Despite significantly elevated blood and urine mercury levels (24-hour urine 2,220 mcg/L on day 0; blood 185 mcg/dL on day 1), he experienced only mild gastrointestinal symptoms, with no end-organ toxicity (Ly et al, 2002).
    10) CASE REPORT: A 10-year-old girl with severe inorganic mercury poisoning (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal, hepatic, neurologic, hematologic, and cardiovascular dysfunctions) and a blood mercury concentration of 5,380 mcg/L and urine mercury of 91 mcg/L, was treated with succimer (10 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours for 5 days and then 10 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for 14 days) 17 days after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. A week after succimer was discontinued, her blood mercury level increased again and urine mercury level decreased. At this time, she was treated with BAL 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 6 hours for the first 2 days, 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 4 hours for the next 2 days, and then 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 12 hours for 7 days. Her symptoms improved gradually, and she was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    E) PENICILLAMINE
    1) Penicillamine has been shown to increase mercury excretion in urine and bile and decrease body burden of mercury in animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning (Kojima et al, 1989; Yonaga & Morita, 1981).
    2) Penicillamine increased urinary excretion of mercury in a child who ingested mercuric chloride (Seidel, 1980).
    3) USUAL ADULT DOSE
    a) 1 to 1.5 g/day given orally in 4 divided doses (Nelson, 2011).
    4) USUAL PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 15 to 30 mg/kg/day in 3 to 4 divided doses. Initially, a small dose may be given to minimize side effects and then increased gradually (eg, 25% of the desired dose in week 1, 50% in week 2, and the full dose by week 3) (Caravati, 2004; Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    5) ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) COMMON SIDE EFFECTS/CHRONIC DOSING: Fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, proteinuria, and myalgia(Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    1) SERIOUS ADVERSE EFFECTS: Nephrotic syndrome, hypersensitivity reactions, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and various autoimmune responses (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009; Feehally et al, 1987; Kay, 1986).
    6) DURATION OF THERAPY
    a) Administer d-penicillamine for 3 to 10 days with daily monitoring of urinary excretion of mercury. If urine mercury falls rapidly, body burden is probably small. Wait 10 days and repeat after a baseline collection to determine if there is a rise on re-chelation therapy indicating further body burden.
    b) Repeated courses of D-penicillamine may be required. Regular follow-up of blood and urine mercury levels will establish need for treatment.
    7) CAUTIONS
    a) Patients allergic to penicillin products may have cross-sensitivity to penicillamine (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    b) Monitor for proteinuria and hematuria; heavy metals may also cause renal toxicity (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    c) Monitor CBC with differential, platelet count, and hepatic enzymes (Prod Info DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, 2009).
    d) CROSS-REACTIVITY: The use of penicillamine in a patient with penicillin allergy is controversial.
    1) While positive penicillamine skin tests have been reported in 2.5 to 10% of patients with history of penicillin allergy, the risk of rash or anaphylaxis in these patients is unknown. One such patient did not react when challenged with oral penicillamine (Bell & Graziano, 1983).
    8) PREGNANCY
    a) Penicillamine is considered FDA pregnancy category D(Prod Info CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, 2004); it should be avoided if possible in pregnant patients.
    b) Use of penicillamine throughout pregnancy has been associated with connective tissue abnormalities, hydrocephalus, cerebral palsy, cardiac and great vessel anomalies, webbing of fingers and toes, and arthrogryposis multipex (Linares et al, 1979; Solomon et al, 1977; Anon, 1981; Beck et al, 1981; Rosa, 1986). However, the teratogenic effect when used in low doses or for short periods of time, as in metal chelation, has yet to be determined.
    9) IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTION
    a) Anuria or other evidence of renal dysfunction makes therapy with d-penicillamine dangerous since the main route of elimination of this complex is renal.
    F) UNITHIOL
    1) DMPS/INDICATIONS: Chelating agent for heavy metal toxicities associated with arsenic, bismuth, copper, lead and mercury (Blanusa et al, 2005).
    2) DMPS/DOSING
    a) ACUTE TOXICITY
    1) ADULT ORAL DOSE:
    a) 1200 to 2400 mg/day in equally divided doses (100 to 200 mg 12 times daily) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    2) ADULT INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    a) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    b) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    c) First 24 hours: 250 mg intravenously every 3 to 4 hours (1500 to 2000 mg total).
    d) Day two: 250 mg intravenously every 4 to 6 hours (1000 to 1500 mg total).
    e) Day three: 250 mg intravenously every 6 to 8 hours (750 to 1000 mg total).
    f) Day four: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 12 hours (500 to 750 mg total).
    g) Subsequent days: 250 mg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (250 to 750 mg total).
    h) Depending on the patient's clinical status, therapy may be changed to the oral route.
    3) PEDIATRIC ORAL DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005):
    a) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    b) Initial dose: 20 to 30 mg/kg/day orally in many equal divided doses.
    c) Maintenance dose: 1.5 to 15 mg/kg/day.
    4) PEDIATRIC INTRAVENOUS DOSE (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Blanusa et al, 2005; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013):
    a) There are insufficient clinical data regarding the pediatric use of DMPS. It should be used only if medically necessary.
    b) If oral DMPS therapy is not feasible or in severe toxicity, it may be given intravenously.
    c) ADMINISTRATION: DMPS should be injected immediately after breaking open the ampule and should not be mixed with other solutions. DMPS should be injected slowly over 3 to 5 minutes. The opened ampules cannot be reused.
    d) First 24 hours: 5 mg/kg intravenously every four hours (total 30 mg/kg).
    e) Day two: 5 mg/kg intravenously every six hours (total 20 mg/kg).
    f) Days three and four: 5 mg/kg intravenously every 8 to 24 hours (total 5 to 15 mg/kg).
    b) CHRONIC TOXICITY
    1) ADULT DOSE
    a) 300 to 400 mg/day orally (in single doses of 100 to 200 mg). The dose may be increased in severe toxicity (Arbeitsgruppe BGVV, 1996; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004).
    c) DMPS/ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Chills, fever, and allergic skin reactions such as itching, exanthema or maculopapular rash are possible (Hla et al, 1992; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). Cardiovascular effects such as hypotension, nausea, dizziness or weakness may occur with too rapid injection of DMPS. Hypotensive effects are irreversible at very high doses (300 mg/kg) (Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004; Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013).
    3) SOURCES
    a) DMPS is not FDA-approved, but is available outside of the US from Heyl Chem-pharm Fabrik in Germany (Prod Info Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2013; Prod Info DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, 2004). In the US it may be obtained from some compounding pharmacies.
    4) EFFICACY
    a) Oral unithiol (a 5-day cycle, 200 mg/day) increased urinary mercury excretion in 12 women with mercury poisoning from using mercury-containing facial cream (mercuric chloride 5.9%) for 2 to 10 years (Garza-Ocanas et al, 1997).
    b) Intravenous unithiol (250 milligrams every 6 hours for 7 days, then every 8 hours for 1 day, then every 12 hours for 8 days, then once daily for 7 days) and continuous venovenous hemofiltration were successfully used to reduce blood mercury levels in a patient with inorganic mercury salt poisoning and renal failure (Pai et al, 2000).
    c) One source reported one patient who ingested over 10 grams of mercury. He developed 10 days of renal failure, but survived (Ashton et al, 1992).
    d) One study reported the use of DMPS in a case of mercury chloride ingestion. Initial blood and urine levels were 14,300 and 36,000 micrograms per liter, respectively. Intravenous DMPS was used initially, but followed by oral use for 4 weeks. The patient recovered without sequelae. Hemodialysis performed with the patient was receiving DMPS, and mercury could not be detected in the dialysate (dialysis clearance less than 1 milliliter/minute) (Toet et al, 1994).
    e) Intravenous DMPS, 250 mg every 4 to 12 hours for 14 days, followed by oral DMPS (Dimaval), 100 mg 3 times per day for 5 weeks and then reduced to 100 mg daily, were successfully used to treat an adolescent who had ingested 2 grams of mercury chloride and developed acute renal failure during BAL treatment (Gricar et al, 1994).
    1) Diuresis and increased urinary mercury excretion occurred during DMPS treatment. Blood mercury level at the start of DMPS was 3730 mcg/L and was 105 mcg/L when discharged 47 days after hospital admission (Gricar et al, 1994).
    f) ANIMAL STUDIES: In animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning, DMPS has been shown to increase survival, reduce nephrotoxicity, increase urinary and fecal mercury elimination, and decrease tissue mercury levels, particularly in brain and kidney (Zalups et al, 1991; Neilsen & Andersen, 1991; Gale et al, 1993).
    5) ADVERSE REACTIONS
    a) SKIN REACTIONS: Urticaria, maculopapular rash, and erythema multiforme (Hla et al, 1992).
    G) N-ACETYL-PENICILLAMINE
    1) DOSE: Oral N-acetyl penicillamine (NAP) 250 mg to 500 mg, 4 times a day for 6 to 10 days (30 mg/kg/day in children) has been associated with increased urinary mercury excretion (Kark et al, 1971; Hryhorczuk et al, 1982; Gledhill & Hopkins, 1972). NAP is still considered experimental.
    H) IRRIGATION OF BOWEL
    1) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping after ingesting approximately 40 g of mercuric oxide. Abdominal radiograph showed densely radiopaque material in the stomach and intestines. He received extensive gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol solution (Golytely) for 24 hours. In addition, he received dimercaprol therapy (4 mg/kg IM first dose, then 3 mg/kg every 6 hours) starting 6 hours after exposure for 5 days, followed by succimer (10 mg/kg every 8 hours) for 10 days. Despite significantly elevated blood and urine mercury levels (24-hour urine 2,220 mcg/L on day 0; blood 185 mcg/dL on day 1), he experienced only mild gastrointestinal symptoms, with no end-organ toxicity (Ly et al, 2002).
    I) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) ANIMAL STUDIES: N-acetylcysteine has been shown to protect against mercury-induced nephrotoxicity in animal models of inorganic mercury poisoning (Girardi & Elias, 1991).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Bronchodilators and oxygen therapy should be provided to patients with bronchospasm or pneumonitis.
    B) Remove all contaminated clothing, seal into bags, and treat as hazardous waste. Medical personnel should wear adequate protective clothing to prevent secondary contamination.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Acute inhalation exposure to mercury compounds can produce local effects on the pulmonary system and can produce elevated urine mercury concentrations (Levin et al, 1988). Chelation may be required.
    2) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    3) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    4) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Gross removal of salts and foreign bodies from conjunctiva should be attempted with a moistened Q-tip. Do no wipe cornea directly with Q-tip due to the risk of corneal abrasion. Irrigation with isotonic fluid 1 to 2 Liters should be performed to remove smaller debris and normalize pH.
    B) Remove all contaminated clothing, seal into bags, and treat as hazardous waste. All medical personnel should wear protective clothing, including respirators if significant amounts of dust are present, to prevent secondary contamination.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Decontaminate with soap and water. Treat caustic injuries with topical wound care ointments, such as 1% silver sulfadiazine cream (silvadene).
    B) PERSONNEL PROTECTION
    1) In cases of significant exposure prehospital decontamination should occur outside the medical facility if possible since the wash may contaminate medical personnel and cause them to become poisoned.
    2) Remove all contaminated clothing, seal into bags, and treat as hazardous waste. The person performing decontamination may be protected by wearing rubber gloves, disposable shoe covers, and a rubber apron.
    3) All medical personnel should wear protective clothing, including respirators if significant amounts of dust are present, to prevent secondary contamination.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) BURN
    1) APPLICATION
    a) These recommendations apply to patients with MINOR chemical burns (FIRST DEGREE; SECOND DEGREE: less than 15% body surface area in adults; less than 10% body surface area in children; THIRD DEGREE: less than 2% body surface area). Consultation with a clinician experienced in burn therapy or a burn unit should be obtained if larger area or more severe burns are present. Neutralizing agents should NOT be used.
    2) DEBRIDEMENT
    a) After initial flushing with large volumes of water to remove any residual chemical material, clean wounds with a mild disinfectant soap and water.
    b) DEVITALIZED SKIN: Loose, nonviable tissue should be removed by gentle cleansing with surgical soap or formal skin debridement (Moylan, 1980; Haynes, 1981). Intravenous analgesia may be required (Roberts, 1988).
    c) BLISTERS: Removal and debridement of closed blisters is controversial. Current consensus is that intact blisters prevent pain and dehydration, promote healing, and allow motion; therefore, blisters should be left intact until they rupture spontaneously or healing is well underway, unless they are extremely large or inhibit motion (Roberts, 1988; Carvajal & Stewart, 1987).
    3) TREATMENT
    a) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS: Prophylactic topical antibiotic therapy with silver sulfadiazine is recommended for all burns except superficial partial thickness (first-degree) burns (Roberts, 1988). For first-degree burns bacitracin may be used, but effectiveness is not documented (Roberts, 1988).
    b) SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTICS: Systemic antibiotics are generally not indicated unless infection is present or the burn involves the hands, feet, or perineum.
    c) WOUND DRESSING:
    1) Depending on the site and area, the burn may be treated open (face, ears, or perineum) or covered with sterile nonstick porous gauze. The gauze dressing should be fluffy and thick enough to absorb all drainage.
    2) Alternatively, a petrolatum fine-mesh gauze dressing may be used alone on partial-thickness burns.
    d) DRESSING CHANGES:
    1) Daily dressing changes are indicated if a burn cream is used; changes every 3 to 4 days are adequate with a dry dressing.
    2) If dressing changes are to be done at home, the patient or caregiver should be instructed in proper techniques and given sufficient dressings and other necessary supplies.
    e) Analgesics such as acetaminophen with codeine may be used for pain relief if needed.
    4) TETANUS PROPHYLAXIS
    a) The patient's tetanus immunization status should be determined. Tetanus toxoid 0.5 milliliter intramuscularly or other indicated tetanus prophylaxis should be administered if required.
    5) If analgesia is needed, acetaminophen containing medications should probably be avoided. Hepatotoxicity has been reported in one patient who received therapeutic doses of acetaminophen after poisoning with elemental mercury (Zwiener et al, 1994).
    B) SKIN ABSORPTION
    1) Carefully observe patients with SKIN exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms.
    2) Dermal absorption of inorganic mercury appears to be minimal. Divers working with mercury salvage recovery from the "quicksilver galleons" have not developed increased mercury concentrations in the urine (Pers Comm, 1999).
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Techniques such as hemodialysis and hemofiltration do not remove a significant amount of the body burden of mercury, but are used as supportive care in patients who develop renal failure.
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis has not been shown to reduce a significant amount of the total body burden following acute ingestion (Sauder et al, 1988), but should be considered early in severely symptomatic patients with diminished urine output following chelation therapy with BAL (Lund et al, 1984). The BAL-mercury complex is water soluble and dialyzable (Giunta, 1983). It has also been used to treat patients in acute renal failure after ingestion of mercuric chloride (Agarwal et al, 1993).
    2) Hemodialysis removed 81 micrograms of mercury per 24 hours in a 23-year-old woman who ingested 7 grams of mercuric chloride 23 hours prior to institution of dialysis (McLauchlan, 1991).
    C) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    1) In an adult who developed acute renal failure after ingesting mercury bichloride, BAL therapy and peritoneal dialysis was associated with mercury clearance rates of 0.57 to 2.38 milliliters/minute (Lowenthal et al, 1974).
    2) In a child with renal failure after ingesting inorganic mercury, dialysate mercury concentrations without BAL therapy were undetectable. When BAL therapy was begun dialysate mercury concentrations ranged form 2.9 to 33 micrograms/Liter (Kahn et al, 1977).
    3) A child with severe inorganic mercury poisoning (blood mercury concentration of 5,380 mcg/L and urine mercury of 91 mcg/L), including renal failure, was treated with peritoneal dialysis (started on day 4 for almost 3 weeks), succimer, and BAL therapy. Her symptoms improved gradually, and she was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    D) EXTRACORPOREAL REGIONAL COMPLEXING HEMODIALYSIS
    1) ERCH: (Extracorporeal Regional Complexing Hemodialysis), using DMSA via arterial infusion, produced a 10-fold increase in dialysate mercury concentrations compared to BAL plus conventional dialysis.
    a) The total amount of mercury removed (1,189 mg) was less than 0.1 percent of the estimated ingested dose (1,425 milligrams) of mercuric chloride, and the patient died 28 days postingestion.
    2) The procedure was delayed until 6 days postingestion. It is possible that efficacy would have been greater if initiated earlier (Kostyniak et al, 1990).
    E) HEMOFILTRATION
    1) Hemofiltration, begun on the fourth day after overdose of 7 grams of mercuric chloride, removed 1.926 milligrams of mercury per 24 hours (McLauchlan, 1991).
    2) Intravenous unithiol (250 milligrams every 6 hours for 7 days, then every 8 hrs for 1 day, then every 12 hrs for 8 days, then once daily for 7 days) and continuous venovenous hemofiltration with high-permeability membranes (for 51 hours, a filtration rate of 1 L/h) were successfully used to reduce blood mercury levels in a patient with inorganic mercury salt poisoning (approximately 10 mL) and renal failure. Initially, hemodialysis was ineffective in removing DMPS-mercury complex (Pai et al, 2000).
    F) PLASMA EXCHANGE
    1) Six plasma exchanges performed between the 7th and 14th day removed only 17 milligrams of mercury in 27-year-old man following an ingestion of 6 grams of mercury chloride (Sauder et al, 1988).
    2) Plasma exchange, performed 23 hours after ingestion of 7 grams of mercuric chloride, removed 3.812 milligrams of mercury (McLauchlan, 1991).

Case Reports

    A) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) A 27-year-old male developed hypovolemic shock, acute renal failure and necrosis of the stomach following ingestion of 6 grams of mercury chloride (Sauder et al, 1988).
    a) Initial treatment included ventilation, plasma expander infusion, vasopressor infusion (dopamine 10 mcg/kg/min), and hemodialysis. A total gastrectomy was performed.
    b) Hemodialysis was performed 42 times in the following 3 months without removal of significant quantities of mercury. Six plasma exchanges between the 7th and 14th day removed only 17 mg of mercury. No chelation therapy was reported. The patient died.
    2) A 23-year-old woman presented to the ED with severe abdominal pain 3 hours after ingesting 7 grams of mercuric chloride. Vomiting, hypotension, and respiratory distress developed.
    a) Therapy included BAL, morphine, sodium bicarbonate, and vasopressors. BAL was substituted with dimercaptopropane-1-sulfate orally. Plasma exchange and continuous hemodialysis were started 20 hours after admission, followed by hemofiltration on the fourth day.
    b) ARDS developed and was attributed to aspiration of inorganic mercury during gastric lavage. Death occurred on the sixth day (McLauchlan, 1991).
    B) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) A 26-year-old woman ingested about 900 mg of mercuric chloride powder (equivalent to 13.8 mg/kg of mercury). Three hours postingestion, therapy was begun with gastric lavage, BAL, hemodialysis, CAPD, and plasma exchange.
    a) Anuria developed on the second day and resolved after 2 weeks. Renal function normalized within 21 days. After termination of therapy, the estimated half-life of inorganic mercury was 23.5 days (Suzuki et al, 1992).
    C) PEDIATRIC
    1) DISC BATTERY INGESTION: A 2-year-old boy swallowed a pocket calculator button battery which was presumed to contain mercuric oxide. The battery did not pass for 26 hours. The passed battery casing was corroded and leaked mercury. Urinary mercury concentrations were 74 mcg/mL (normal <20 mcg/L). The patient was asymptomatic (Bass & Millar, 1992).
    2) A 10-year-old girl presented with green watery diarrhea, abdominal pain, hematemesis, bloody stool, nose bleeding, and erythematous throat 7 days after swimming in a creek containing inorganic mercury. Laboratory analysis revealed hemolytic anemia, abnormal renal function, and elevated liver enzymes. An abdominal ultrasound revealed diffuse hyperechogenic hepatomegaly with ascites and renal enlargement. Peritoneal dialysis was started on day 4. A week later, she developed emotional instability, sleeplessness, coarse tremors of hands, excessive salivation, insistent spitting, chelitis, evanescent erythematous rash on extremities, dryness, and peeling of skin. Her condition deteriorated rapidly and she developed generalized tonic-clonic seizures and suffered a stroke and hemiplegia on the right side. She also experienced hearing difficulty and her audiogram revealed bilateral, mild sensorineural hearing loss. Tachycardia and hypertension were also observed. An echocardiography showed decreased left ventricular function. On day 17, laboratory analysis revealed a blood mercury concentration of 5,380 mcg/L and urine mercury of 91 mcg/L. She was treated with succimer 10 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours for 5 days and then 10 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for 14 days. A week after succimer was discontinued, her blood mercury level increased again and urine mercury level decreased. At this time, she was treated with BAL 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 6 hours for the first 2 days, 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 4 hours for the next 2 days, and then 3 mg/kg/dose IM every 12 hours for 7 days. Her symptoms improved gradually, and she was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Mercury I chloride is one of the most toxic inorganic mercury salts. Fatalities have occurred from exposure to as little as 0.5 g. The more commonly reported estimated lethal dose of ingested mercury I chloride in an adult is 1 to 2 grams or 10 to 42 mg mercury/kg. For most inorganic mercury compounds, the acute lethal dose for a 70 kg adult is 1 to 4 grams or 14 to 57 mg/kg. There is insufficient data to quantify the amount of inorganic mercury associated with chronic toxicity. Chronic dermal can produce systemic toxicity.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) MERCURIC CHLORIDE INGESTION
    a) The more commonly reported estimated lethal dose of ingested mercury I chloride in a 70 kg adult is 1 to 2 grams or 10 to 42 mg mercury/kg. Fatalities have occurred from exposures as low as 0.5 g (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007; Winek et al, 1981; US DHHS, 1994; Gosselin et al, 1984; Skerfving & Vostal, 1972). For most inorganic mercury compounds, the acute lethal dose for a 70 kg adult is 1 to 4 grams or 14 to 57 mg/kg (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
    b) Nine cases of suicide following ingestion of mercuric chloride involved lethal doses ranging from 29 to > 50 mg/kg. Gastrointestinal lesion, albuminuria anuria, and uremia were commonly reported. Death due to renal failure has been reported following ingestion of an unknown amount of a Chinese medicine (Kang-Yum & Oransky, 1992; US DHHS, 1994).
    c) An adult man died on the 91st day of admission from complications associated with ingestion of 6 grams of mercury chloride. Hemodialysis did NOT remove significant amounts of mercury chloride. Six plasma exchanges removed only 17 milligrams of mercury. No chelation therapy was performed (Sauder et al, 1988).
    d) Death from inorganic mercury salts ingestion is usually due to severe corrosive injury to the gastrointestinal system, shock, cardiovascular collapse, and/or acute renal failure (Skerfving & Vostal, 1972; US DHHS, 1994).
    B) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) PERITONEAL LAVAGE SOLUTIONS
    a) Ten cases of severe toxic reactions, five of which resulted in death, have occurred following peritoneal lavage solutions containing mercuric chloride concentrations of 1:500 to 1:2000. In one case, death occurred after the use of a solution containing as little as 400 milligrams HgCl2 (Laundry et al, 1984).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INGESTION
    a) Maximum tolerated oral concentrations, WITHOUT TREATMENT, are unknown.
    1) An adult woman survived ingestion of 900 milligrams (13.8 milligrams/kilogram) of mercuric chloride. The woman vomited several times immediately after the ingestion and was treated with BAL, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and plasma exchange by 3 hours postingestion (Suzuki et al, 1992).
    b) A 39-year-old woman vomited twice immediately after ingesting one 15 mL vial of a stool fixative (Para-Pak) containing 4.5% mercuric chloride (675 mg), 5% polyvinyl alcohol, 30% denatured alcohol, 4.5% acetic acid, and 1.5% glycerin in an aqueous solution. She was treated within 2 hours with dimercaprol and intravenous fluids. The serum and urinary mercury levels 2 hours post-ingestion were 710 ng/L and 276 mcg/L, respectively. She remained asymptomatic throughout her hospital course (Singer et al, 1994).
    2) DERMAL
    a) Neurotoxicity and elevated blood mercury levels resulted from the long term use of an ointment which contained 5% to 10% ammoniated mercury. The equivalent of approximately 1.5 to 2 kilograms of elemental mercury was applied to the skin in the ointment over 40 years (Kern et al, 1991).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) The concentration of inorganic mercury present in blood (serum or plasma) that has been reported to cause death in humans is: 0.04 to 2.2 mg% (or 0.4 to 22 mcg/mL) (Winek et al, 1981).
    2) Mercury concentrations in stomach contents, blood, and liver were determined by Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) in an adult male who had ingested an unknown amount of mercuric chloride. Determination by other methods was not discussed. The man died 6 to 14 hours postingestion. Mercury concentrations were 28 x 10(3) mcg/mL of mercury (9.5 grams mercuric chloride in the 250 mL submitted) in stomach contents, 72 mcg/mL of mercury in blood, and 335 mcg/gram of mercury in liver (Winstanley et al, 1987).
    3) ADULTS
    a) The following mercury levels were obtained from a woman with mercury poisoning after using a cosmetic cream twice daily for several months: Hair, 22.5 mcg/g (normal, 11.6 mcg/g or less); blood 94 nmol/L (normal, 45 nmol/L or less), urine excretion 345 nmol/day (normal, 50 nmol/day or less). The mercury content of the cosmetic cream was 6.5% w/w (Chan et al, 2001).
    b) A woman developed nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous nephropathy after using a skin-whitening cream containing mercury (concentration, almost 2000 times above the allowable limit) for 5 years. Her blood mercury and 24-hour urinary mercury excretion concentrations were 163 nmol/L and 754.6 nmol/d, respectively (Soo et al, 2003)
    c) A man developed acute lung injury (progressive dyspnea and acute respiratory failure) after mercury vapor inhalation from heating Chinese red (Cinnabar, mercury sulfide). His initial serum and urine mercury concentrations were 33 mcg/dL (normal less than 6 mcg/dL) and 0.87 mcg/dL (normal less than 5 mcg/dL), respectively. Despite supportive therapy and treatment with DMPS and penicillamine, he eventually died from profound hypoxemia 39 days after Inhalation of the vapor (Ho et al, 2003).
    d) A man, with a history of schizophrenia, developed severe axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy, which progressed to quadriparesis after drinking a traditional Chinese herb mixture (Huei Chen Shai) daily for 3 months. The mixture was prepared by mixing 200 grams of the herb with mercurial droplets from 10 broken thermometers in boiled water. The laboratory analysis of the herb drug showed mercury concentration of 10,000 ppm, lead 116 ppm, arsenic 18.9 ppm, and cadmium 0.97 ppm. Blood and urine mercury concentrations were not measured in acute stage until 2 months later; however, the concentrations of mercury in the scalp hair (14.2 mcg/g; reference, less than 5.5 mcg/g) and pubic hair (9.1 mcg/g; reference, less than 1.6 mcg/g) were high even 6 months later. Following supportive therapy, his muscle weakness improved slowly; however, at the 2-year follow-up examination, he still had sensory and motor impairment (Chu et al, 1998) .
    e) Urinary mercury excretion in 12 women after using a mercury-containing facial cream (mercuric chloride, 5.9%) ranged from 180 to 1876 mcg/g creatinine (Garza-Ocanas et al, 1997).
    f) In one study, mercury concentrations in urine specimens from 22 patients in 5 households with potential mercury exposure were obtained. Ten patients (age range, 16 to 62 years) used mercury-containing skin-lightening creams (mercury content range, 2% to 5.7% by weight) from Mexico intermittently to twice daily (duration range, several months to 5 years). Elevated urinary mercury concentrations were observed in 15 patients, 9 cream users (range, 26 to 317 mcg/g creatinine) and 6 nonusers (range, 20 to 276 mcg/g creatinine). One cream user had a mercury concentration of only 4 mcg/g. Mercury concentrations of 17 to 50 mcg/m(3) were obtained from areas close to where creams were stored (eg, near cleaning supplies, clothing, and furniture), and near items frequently touched by cream users (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012).
    g) Two hours post-ingestion, a woman with mercury poisoning (ingested one 15 mL vial of a stool fixative (Para-Pak) containing 4.5% mercuric chloride (675 mg)) had the following serum and urinary mercury levels, respectively: 710 ng/mL and 276 mcg/L (Singer et al, 1994).
    4) CHILDREN
    a) An 11-month-old boy presented with failure to thrive and developmental regression, irritability, painful, swollen, erythematous extremities, swollen fingers and toes, and hypertension. Laboratory results revealed a blood mercury concentration of 13.8 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 15.4 mcg/L), a urine mercury of 61.6 mcg/L (adult reference, less than 20 mcg/L), and urine mercury/creatinine ratio of 150 mcg/g creatinine (adult reference, less than 5 mcg/g creatinine). His pediatrician later reported a blood mercury concentration of 18 mcg/L and urine mercury/creatinine after a succimer challenge of 340 mcg/g. It was found that he was given a Chinese medicinal powder (mercury content, 1228 ppm) for 4 months (from 6 months to 10 months of age). Following treatment with one course of succimer 100 mg every 8 hours for 10 days and amlodipine 1.5 mg daily, his symptoms gradually resolved (Koh et al, 2009).
    b) A 5-year-old boy with recurrent oral ulceration developed motor and vocal tics after using a Chinese medicinal herb mouth spray (Watermelon Frost; mercury content, 878 ppm; 98% inorganic mercury and 2% methylmercury) up to 20 times a day for 4 weeks instead the recommended dose of one spray twice daily. His blood mercury concentration was 83 nmol/L (normal for adults less than 50 nmol/L). Following the discontinuation of the mouth spray, his ticks resolved completely (Li et al, 2000).
    c) A 10-year-old girl with severe inorganic mercury poisoning (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal, hepatic, neurologic, hematologic, and cardiovascular dysfunctions) and a blood mercury concentration of 5,380 mcg/L and urine mercury of 91 mcg/L, was treated with succimer and BAL. Her symptoms improved gradually, and she was discharged after 67 days of hospitalization (Erkek et al, 2010).
    d) A 2-year-old boy developed corrosive trauma to the gastrointestinal tract mucosa and acute non-oliguric renal failure after ingesting an unknown quantity of mercury chloride. His blood and urinary mercury concentrations were 35 mcg/dL and 24 mcg/dL, respectively (Verma et al, 2010).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7439-97-6 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: BEI, Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    b) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    c) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    b) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.025 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: 200.59
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    c) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS and PNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    d) Under Study
    1) Mercury, alkyl compounds
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA:
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions: Not Listed
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s):
    d) Molecular Weight:
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:
    e) Adopted Value
    1) Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.1 mg/m(3)
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): CNS impair; kidney dam
    d) Molecular Weight: Varies
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7439-97-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: Hg Vapor: 0.05 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s): ,
    3) Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    4) REL:
    a) TWA: 0.01 mg/m(3)
    b) STEL: 0.03 mg/m(3)
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: [skin]
    1) Indicates the potential for dermal absorption; skin exposure should be prevented as necessary through the use of good work practices and gloves, coveralls, goggles, and other appropriate equipment.
    f) Note(s):
    5) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 10 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
    b) Note(s): Not Listed
    6) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 2 mg Hg/m3 (as Hg)
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7439-97-6 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental and inorganic forms, as Hg
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    2) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Mercury, as Hg
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    3) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds, as Hg
    4) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, alkyl compounds
    5) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury, aryl compounds, as Hg
    6) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): D ; Listed as: Mercury, elemental
    a) D : Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity.
    7) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 3 ; Listed as: Mercury and inorganic mercury compounds
    a) 3 : The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    8) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury compounds [except (organo) alkyls, as Hg]
    9) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    10) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury (metallic mercury and inorganic mercury compounds)
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    11) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 3B ; Listed as: Mercury, organic compounds
    a) Category 3B : Substances for which in vitro or animal studies have yielded evidence of carcinogenic effects that is not sufficient for classification of the substance in one of the other categories. Further studies are required before a final decision can be made. A MAK value can be established provided no genotoxic effects have been detected. (Footnote: In the past, when a substance was classified as Category 3 it was given a MAK value provided that it had no detectable genotoxic effects. When all such substances have been examined for whether or not they may be classified in Category 4, this sentence may be omitted.)
    12) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS7439-97-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg)
    2) Table Z-1 for Mercury (aryl and inorganic) (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    3) Listed as: Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg)
    4) Table Z-1 for Mercury (organo) alkyl compounds (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    5) Listed as: Mercury (vapor) (as Hg)
    6) Table Z-1 for Mercury (vapor) (as Hg):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    7) Table Z-2 for Mercury (Z37.8-1971):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    b) Acceptable Ceiling Concentration: 1 mg/10m(3)
    c) Acceptable Maximum Peak above the Ceiling Concentration for an 8-hour Shift:
    1) Concentration:
    2) Maximum Duration:
    d) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    1) 44,300 mcg/m(3) for 8H (RTECS , 1992)
    2) 150 mcg/m(3) for 46D (RTECS , 1992)

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Mercury ions bind to sulfhydryl groups and also have an affinity for phosphoryl, carboxyl, amide and amine groups. The structure and function of key proteins and enzymes may be disturbed, receptor affinities altered, and cellular metabolism impaired, among other effects. Nonspecific cell injury or death may result (Klassen, 1990; (Goyer, 1991).
    B) There is limited human data (Lauwerys et al, 1983) and more extensive animal studies (Kosuda et al, 1993; Kosuda & Hosseinzadeh, 1994; Hultman & Johansson, 1991) which suggest that inorganic mercury associated renal toxicity is due to mercury-induced immunological effects.
    1) Mercury may induce autoantibodies to renal antigens and cause immune complex mediated glomerulonephritis.

Molecular Weight

    A) 200.59

Clinical Effects

    11.1.2) BOVINE/CATTLE
    A) Organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts are more commonly associated with acute toxicity (mercury toxicosis) in animals than elemental mercury exposure. Ingestion of batteries which contain mercury has been associated with mercury toxicosis in some animals (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    1) Clinical signs of mercury toxicosis (associated chiefly with organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts) may include stomatitis, salivation, hemorrhagic or necrotic enteritis, decreased appetite, weakness, and hematuria. Skin and hair changes may be noted. Severe neurological effects may also occur in cattle following organomercury exposure (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain may occur.
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) Gastroenteritis, watery bloody diarrhea and abdominal pain may occur.
    11.1.10) PORCINE/SWINE
    A) Organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts are more commonly associated with acute toxicity in animals than exposure to elemental mercury. Ingestion of batteries which contain mercury has been associated with mercury toxicosis in some animals (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    1) Clinical signs of acute or subacute mercury toxicosis due principally to organomercurials and inorganic mercury salts include stomatitis, salivation, vomiting (in swine), hemorrhagic or necrotic enteritis, decreased appetite, weakness, and hematuria. White pigs may display erythema. Other skin and hair changes may be noted. Severe neurological effects have also been associated with organic mercury exposure in swine (Osweiler & Hook, 1986).
    11.1.13) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) Muscle incoordination, ataxia, hyperesthesia, tremor, seizures, and coma may occur in some animals. Unusual weight loss may occur as a result of diarrhea and anorexia.
    2) ACUTE SYNDROME - Acute syndrome is marked by gastrointestinal signs including vomiting and diarrhea which may lead to fluid and electrolyte losses (Beasley et al, 1990).
    3) CHRONIC SYNDROME - Chronic syndrome is more common, after exposure periods of several days or longer. Neurologic, GI, renal, and dermal effects are seen (Beasley et al, 1990).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    2) Begin treatment immediately.
    3) Keep animal warm.
    4) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    5) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    6) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Induce emesis with syrup of ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM, or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally. Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liter), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    b) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    B) SMALL ANIMALS
    1) Emesis or gastric lavage followed by activated charcoal, 20% sodium thiosulfate (0.5 to 3 g), egg white, or tannic acid (200 to 500 mg in 30 to 60 mL water).
    2) Dimercaprol (BAL) 3 mg/kg IM every 4 hours days 1 and 2, four times daily on day 3, followed by twice daily on days 4 through 10. d-Penicillamine 11 mg/kg four times daily for 7 to 10 days, orally.
    C) LARGE ANIMALS
    1) Adsorbant - Dimercaprol (BAL): 3 mg/kg IM. Repeat every 4 hours for 2 days, then four times daily on 3rd day, then twice daily for 10 days until recovery. Supportive fluid and electrolyte therapy.

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) GENERAL
    1) ALKYL MERCURIC COMPOUNDS - Methyl and ethyl mercury are the most toxic forms of mercury. All forms of mercury sequestered in living organisms are converted by anaerobic bacteria into methyl mercury. This is also the form of mercury found in eggs as residue, regardless of the form of mercury ingested by the bird (Beasley et al, 1990).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) The following recommendations are principally intended for inorganic or organic mercury exposure.
    2) Begin treatment immediately.
    3) Keep animal warm.
    4) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    5) If skin exposure has occurred, wash animal thoroughly with a mild detergent and flush with copious amounts of water.
    6) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) SMALL ANIMALS
    a) Induce emesis with syrup of ipecac, 10 to 30 mL orally or hydrogen peroxide 5 to 25 mL orally repeated in 5 to 10 minutes if there is no response. DOGS ONLY may receive apomorphine 0.05 to 0.10 mg/kg IV, IM, or subcutaneously.
    b) Gastric lavage may be performed using tap water or normal saline.
    c) Administer activated charcoal, 5 to 50 g, orally, as a slurry in water.
    d) Then administer Milk of Magnesia 1 to 15 mL orally, mineral oil 2 to 15 mL orally, sodium sulfate 20%, 2 to 25 g orally or magnesium sulfate 20% 2 to 25 g orally, for catharsis.
    2) LARGE ANIMALS
    a) Give 250 to 500 g of activated charcoal in a water slurry, orally. Administer an oral cathartic: mineral oil (1 to 3 liter), 20% sodium sulfate (25 to 10,000 g), 20% magnesium sulfate (25 to 1,000 g), or Milk of Magnesia (20 to 30 mL).
    b) Ruminants (cattle and sheep) cannot be made to vomit. Horses should not be made to vomit.

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) Inorganic mercury is well-absorbed from the lungs, but only 7 to 15% is absorbed through the skin and GI tract. Mercury salts can also bind to gut mucosa (Beasley et al, 1990).
    2) Organic mercurials are absorbed via all routes, including dermal (Beasley et al, 1990).

Sources

    A) GENERAL
    1) Inorganic and organic mercurials are frequently found in manufactured products such as anti-fouling paints used on boat bottoms, batteries, and fungicides. Sewage sludge may contain mercury. The primary environmental form of mercury is methyl mercury, produced by anaerobic bacteria inside and outside of living organisms (Beasley et al, 1990).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) ARLAUSKAS A: ENVIRON RES 1985; 36:379-388.
    15) Aaseth J, Alexander J, & Raknerud N: Treatment of mercuric chloride poisoning with dimercaptosuccininc acid and diuretics: preliminary studies. J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:173-186.
    16) Abdelmegid L, Salem E, & Elsadik Y: A study on some biochemical renal parameters in workers exposed to elemental mercury vapors (abstract). Vet hum Toxicol 1993; 35:355.
    17) Adams CR, Ziegler DK, & Lin JT: Mercury intoxication stimulating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA 1983; 250:642-643.
    18) Afonso J & de Alverez R: Effects of mercury on human gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 80:145-154.
    19) Agarwal SK, Tiwari SC, & Dash SC: Spectrum of poisoning requiring haemodialysis in a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16:20-22.
    20) Al-Saleh I, Abduljabbar M, Al-Rouqi R, et al: Mercury (Hg) exposure in breast-fed infants and their mothers and the evidence of oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013; 153(1-3):145-154.
    21) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    22) Anon: Cutis laxa and other congenital defects with penicillamine, ADR Highlights (Division of drug experience), Rockville, MD, 1981, pp 1-4-81-21.
    23) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    24) Arbeitsgruppe BGVV: Allgemeine und spezielle Massnahmen bei Vergiftungen und bei Drogennotfaellen. Empfehlungen der Kommission "Erkennung und Behandlung von Vergiftungen", Bundesinstituts fuer gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinaermedizin, Berlin, Germany, 1996.
    25) Ashton CE, Illa KK, & Mant T: 2,3-Dimercaptopropane-1-sulphonate (DMPS) in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning, an effective and potentially life saving treatment (Abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 34.
    26) Baglan RJ et al: Proc Ann NSF Trace Contam Conf, 1st Iss Conf; 730802:505-509, 1974.
    27) Barilyak IR: Gig Sanit 1984; 10:65-67.
    28) Barlow SM & Sullivan FM: Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals, Academic Press, London, UK, 1982, pp 386-406.
    29) Barregard L: Biological monitoring of exposure to mercury vapor. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 1:45-9.
    30) Bass DH & Millar AJW: Mercury absorption following button battery ingestion. J Ped Surg 1992; 27:1541-1542.
    31) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    32) Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A Systems Affected Approach to Veterinary Toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1990.
    33) Beck RB, Rosenbaum KN, & Byers PH: Ultrastructural findings in fetal penicillamine syndrome, 14th March of Dimes Ann Birth Defects Conf, San Diego, CA, 1981.
    34) Bell CL & Graziano FM: The safety of administration of penicillamine to penicillin-sensitive individuals. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26:801-803.
    35) Bencko V, Wagner V, & Wagnerova M: Immunological profiles in workers occupationally exposed to inorganic mercury. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 1990; 34:9-15.
    36) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    37) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    38) Blanusa M, Varnai VM, Piasek M, et al: Chelators as antidotes of metal toxicity: therapeutic and experimental aspects. Curr Med Chem 2005; 12(23):2771-2794.
    39) Boadi WY, Urbach J, & Brandes JM: In vitro effect of mercury on enzyme activities and its accumulation in the first-trimester human placenta. Environ Res 1992; 57:96-106.
    40) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    41) Bourgeois M, Dooms-Goossens A, & Knockaert D: Mercury intoxication after topical application of a metallic mercury ointment. Dermatologica 1986; 172:48-51.
    42) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 11th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, 1989.
    43) CDC: Mercury poisoning associated with beauty cream -- Texas, New Mexico, and California, 1995-1996. Report by Occ-Env-Med-L Mail list on Internet, Duke Occup/Environ Medicine Division (May 17), 1996.
    44) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    45) Caravati EM: D-Penicillamine. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    46) Cardenas A, Roels H, & Bernard AM: Markers of early renal changes induced by industrial pollutants. I. Application to workers exposed to mercury vapour. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50:17-27.
    47) Carvajal HF & Stewart CE: Emergency management of burn patients: the first few hours. Emerg Med Reports 1987; 8:129-136.
    48) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Mercury exposure among household users and nonusers of skin-lightening creams produced in Mexico - California and Virginia, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61(2):33-36.
    49) Chakera A, Lasserson D, Beck LH Jr, et al: Membranous nephropathy after use of UK-manufactured skin creams containing mercury. QJM 2011; 104(10):893-896.
    50) Chan MM, Cheung RC, Chan IH, et al: An unusual case of mercury intoxication. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144(1):192-194.
    51) Chapman LJ, Sauter SL, & Henning RA: Differences in frequency of finger tremor in otherwise asymptomatic mercury workers. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:838-843.
    52) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    53) Cherian MG: Arch Environ Health 1978; 33:109-114.
    54) Chowdhury AR & Arora U: Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 1982; 26:246-249.
    55) Chu CC, Huang CC, Ryu SJ, et al: Chronic inorganic mercury induced peripheral neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand 1998; 98(6):461-465.
    56) Chugh KS, Singhal PC, & Uberoi HS: Rhabdomyolysis and renal failure in acute mercuric chloride poisoning. Med J Aust 1978; 2:125-126.
    57) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    58) Clarkson TW: Mercury - an element of mystery (editorial). N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1137-1138.
    59) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    60) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    61) Contrino J, Marucha P, & Ribaudo R: Effects of mercury on human polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in vitro. Am J Pathol 1988; 132:110-118.
    62) Cordeiro Q Jr, de Araujo Medrado Faria M, & Fraguas R Jr: Depression, insomnia, and memor loss in a patient with chronic intoxication by inorganic mercury (letter). J Neuropsychiat Clin Neurosci 2003; 15(4):457-458.
    63) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    64) De Bont B, Lauwerys R, & Govaerts H: Yellow mercuric oxide ointment and mercury intoxiciation. Eur J Pediatr 1986; 145:217-218.
    65) Debray P, Besson-Leaud M, & Lavaud J: Intoxication aigue par le mercure chez L'enfant: a propos de quatre observations [Acute mercury poisoning in children: 4 cases]. (Translated from French by Alan H. Hall). Ann Pediatr 1979; 26:531-537.
    66) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    67) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    68) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    69) Dyall-Smith DJ & Scurry JP: Mercury pigmentation and high mercury levels from the use of a cosmetic cream. Med J Aust 1990; 153:409-415.
    70) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    71) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    72) Eagle H & Magnuson HJ: The systemic treatment of 227 cases of arsenic poisoning (encephalitis, dermatitis, blood dyscrasia, jaundice, fever) with 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). Am J Syph Gonor Ven Dis 1946; 30:420-441.
    73) Ellingsen DG, Andersen A, & Nordhagen HP: Incidence of cancer and mortality among workers exposed to mercury vapour in the Norwegian chloralkali industry. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50(10):875-880.
    74) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    75) Erkek N , Senel S , Sarac A , et al: Being alive after a severe inorganic mercury intoxication. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(5):625-628.
    76) Ermachenko AB: Gig Sanit 1982; 11:72-73.
    77) Ernst E & Lauritsen JG: Effect of organic and inorganic mercury on human sperm motility. Pharmacol Toxicol 1991; 68:440-444.
    78) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    79) FOLKL H & KONIG P: WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR 1983; 95:580-584.
    80) Feehally J, Wheeler DC, Mackay EH, et al: Recurrent acute renal failure with interstitial nephritis due to D-penicillamine. Renal Failure 1987; 10:55-57.
    81) Fournier L, Thomas G, & Garnier R: 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid treatment of heavy metal poisoning in humans. Med Toxicol 1988; 3:499-504.
    82) Franco A, Antolin A, Trigueros M, et al: Two consecutive episodes of acute renal failure following mercury poisoning. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997; 12(2):328-330.
    83) Gale GR, Smith AB, & Jones MM: Meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid monoalkyl esters: effects on mercury levels in mice. Toxicology 1993; 81:49-56.
    84) Garza-Ocanas L, Torres-Alanis O, & Pineyro-Lopez A: Urinary mercury in twelve cases of cutaneous mercurous chloride (calomel) exposure: effect of sodium 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate (DMPS) therapy. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35(6):653-655.
    85) Girardi G & Elias MM: Effectivelness of N-acetylcysteine in protecting against mercuric chloride-induced nephrotoxicity. Toxicology 1991; 67:155-164.
    86) Giunta F, DiLandro D, & Chiaranda M: Severe acute poisoning from the ingestion of a permanent wave solution of mercuric chloride. Human Toxicol 1983; 2:243-246.
    87) Gledhill RF & Hopkins AP: Chronic inorganic mercury poisoning treated with N-acetyl-D-penicillamine. Brit J Industr Med 1972; 29:225-228.
    88) Goldman M & Blackburn P: The effect of mercuric chloride on thyroid function in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 48:49-55.
    89) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    90) Goncharuk GA: Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1971; 7:73-75.
    91) Goncharuk GA: Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1977; 5:17-20.
    92) Gonzalez MJ, Rico MC, & Hernandez LM: Mercury in human hair: a study of residents in Madrid, Spain. Arch Environ Health 1985; 40:225-228.
    93) Gosselin RE, Smith RP, & Hodge HC: Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1984.
    94) Govorunova NN: Gig Sanit 1981; 5:73-74.
    95) Goyer RA: Toxic effects of metals. In: MO Amdur, J Doull & CD Klaassen (Eds): Casarett and Doull's Toxicology, 4th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991.
    96) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    97) Grant MW: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 213,214,488621-624.
    98) Graziano JH, Cuccia D, & Friedheim E: Potential usefulness of 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid for the treatment of arsenic poisoning. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 207:1051-1055.
    99) Graziano JH, Siris ES, & Lolacono N: 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid as an antidote for lead intoxication. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985; 37:432-438.
    100) Graziano JH: Role of 2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of heavy metal poisoning. Med Toxicol 1986; 1:155-162.
    101) Gricar M, Jamsek M, & Mozina M: Toxicokinetics of mercury in HgCl2 poisoning, treated with prolonged use of intravenous DMPS (abstract), EAPCCT XVI International Congress, Vienna, Austria, 1994.
    102) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    103) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    104) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    105) Haynes BW Jr: Emergency department management of minor burns. Top Emerg Med 1981; 3:35-40.
    106) Hla KK, Ashton CE, & Henry JA: Adverse effects from 2,3-dimercaptopropane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 13.
    107) Ho BS, Lin JL, Huang CC, et al: Mercury vapor inhalation from Chinese red (Cinnabar). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41(1):75-78.
    108) Holmes AS, Blaxill MF, & Haley BE: Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. Int J Toxicol 2003; 22:277-285.
    109) Howland MA: Dimercaprol (BAL), in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    110) Hryhorczuk DO, Meyers L, & Chen G: Treatment of mercury intoxication in a dentist with N-acetyl-D, L-penicillamine. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1982; 19:401-408.
    111) Hultman P & Johansson U: Strain differences in the effect of mercury on murine cell-mediated immune reactions. Fd Chem Toxic 1991; 29:633-638.
    112) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    113) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    114) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    115) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    116) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    117) IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in the Glass Manufacturing Industry, Volume 58, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993, pp 239-288.
    118) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    119) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    120) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    121) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    122) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    123) Ishihara N, Shiojima S, & Suzuki T: Selective enhancement of urinary organic mercury excretion by D-penicillamine. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:245-249.
    124) Jeddeloh RJ, Lake KD, & Brown DC: Ammoniated mercury membraneous nephropathy. Minn Med 1985; 68:591-592.
    125) Kahn A, Denis R, & Blum D: Accidental ingestion of mercuric sulphate in a 4-year-old child. Clin Peds 1977; 10:956-958.
    126) Kajiwara Y & Inouye M: Effects of methylmercury and mercuric chloride on preimplantation mouse embryos in vivo. Teratology 1986; 33:231-237.
    127) Kanerva L, Komulainen M, & Estlander T: Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mercury. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28:26-28.
    128) Kang-Yum E & Oransky SH: Chinese patent medicine as a potential source of mercury poisoning. Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:235-238.
    129) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    130) Kark RAP, Poskanzer DC, & Bullock JD: Mercury poisoning and its treatment with N-acetyl-d,l-penicillamine. N Engl J Med 1971; 285:10-16.
    131) Kay A: European league against rheumatism study of adverse reactions to D-penicillamine. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25:193-198.
    132) Kern F, Roberts N, & Ostlere L: Ammoniated mercury ointment as a cause of peripheral neuropathy. Dermatologica 1991; 183:280-282.
    133) Kershaw TG, Dhahir PH, & Clarkson TW: The relationship between blood levels and dose of methylmercury in man. Arch Environ Health 1980; 35:28-35.
    134) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    135) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    136) Klaassen KD: Heavy metals and heavy metal antagonists. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS et al (Eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 1598-1602.
    137) Knight AL: Mercury and its compounds. In: Zenz C (Ed): Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed, Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chicago, IL, 1988, pp 590-596.
    138) Koh C, Kwong KL, & Wong SN: Mercury poisoning: a rare but treatable cause of failure to thrive and developmental regression in an infant. Hong Kong Med J 2009; 15(1):61-64.
    139) Kojima S, Shimada H, & Kiyozumi M: Comparative effects of chelating agents on distribution, excretion, and renal toxicity of inorganic mercury in rats. Research Comm Chem Path Pharmacol 1989; 64:471-484.
    140) Kosnett M, Dutra C, & Osterloh J: Nephrotoxicity from elemental mercury: protective effects of dimercaptosuccinic acid (abstract 85). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:351.
    141) Kostyniak PJ, Greizerstein HB, & Goldstein J: Extracorporeal regional complexing haemodialysis treatment of acute inorganic mercury intoxication. Human Toxicol 1990; 9:137-141.
    142) Kosuda LL & Hosseinzadeh H: Role of RT6+ T lymphocytes in mercury- induced renal autoimmunity: experimental manipulations of "susceptible" and "resistant" rats. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1994; 42:303-321.
    143) Kosuda LL, Greiner DL, & Bigazzi PE: Mercury-induced renal autoimmunity: changes in RT6+ T-lymphocytes of susceptible and resistant rats. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 191:178-185.
    144) Kulling P, Keychting K, & Skold H: DMPS and DMSA in mercury poisoning: two case reports of successful treatment (abstract P-024), EAPCCT International Congress, Krakow, Poland, 1995.
    145) Kuntzelman DR & Angle CR: Abnormal liver function in childhood lead poisoning unaffected by DMSA (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:355.
    146) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    147) Langworth S, Almkvist O, & Soderman E: Effects of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the central nervous system. Br J Ind Med 1992; 29:545-555.
    148) Langworth S, Elinder CG, & Sundquist KG: Renal and immunological effects of occupational exposure to inorganic mercury. Br J Ind Med 1992a; 49:394-401.
    149) Laundry T, Adam AE, & Kershaw JB: Deaths after peritoneal lavage with mercuric chloride solutions: case report and review of the literature. Br Med J 1984; 289:96-98.
    150) Lauwerys R, Bonnier Ch, & Evrard Ph: Prenatal and early postnatal intoxication by inorganic mercury resulting from the maternal use of mercury containing soap. Human Toxicol 1987; 6:253-256.
    151) Lauwerys R, Roels H, & Genet P: Fertility of male workers exposed to mercury vapor or to manganese dust: a questionnaire study. Am J Ind Med 1985; 7:171-176.
    152) Lauwerys R: Environ Res 1978; 15:278-289.
    153) Lauwerys RL, Bernard A, & Roels H: Anti-laminin antibodies in workers exposed to mercury vapour. Toxicol Lett 1983; 17:113-116.
    154) Lee IP & Dixon RL: Effects of mercury on spermatogenesis studied by velocity sedimentation cell separation and serial mating. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1975; 194:171-181.
    155) Levin M, Jacobs J, & Polos PG: Acute mercury poisoning and mercurial pneumonitis from gold ore purification. Chest 1988; 94:554-556.
    156) Li AM, Chan MH, Leung TF, et al: Mercury intoxication presenting with tics. Arch Dis Child 2000; 83(2):174-175.
    157) Liang L, Bloom NS, & Horvat M: Simultaneous determination of mercury speciation in biological materials by GC/cvafs after ethylation and room-temperature precollection. Clin Chem 1994; 40:602-607.
    158) Liang Y, Sun R, & Sun Y: Psychological effects of low exposure to mercury vapor: application of a computer-administered neurobehavioral evaluation system. Environ Res 1993; 60:320-327.
    159) Lien DC, Todoruk DN, & Rajani HR: Accidental inhalation of mercury vapor: respiratory and toxicologic consequences. Can Med Assoc J 1983a; 129:591-595.
    160) Lien DC, Todoruk DN, & Rajani HR: Accidental inhalation of mercury vapor: respiratory and toxicologic consequences. Canad Med Assoc J 1983; 129:591-595.
    161) Linares A, Zarranz JJ, & Rodrigues-Alarcon J: Reversible cutis laxa due to maternal d-penicillamine treatment. Lancet 1979; 2:43.
    162) Longcope WT, Luetscher JA, & Calkins E: Clinical uses of 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL). XI the treatment of acute mercury poisoning by BAL. J Clin Investigation 1946; 25:557-567.
    163) Lowenthal DT, Chardo F, & Reidenberg MM: Removal of mercury by peritoneal dialysis. Arch Int Med 1974; 134:139-141.
    164) Lund ME, Clarkson TW, & Berlin M: Treatment of acute methylmercury ingestion by hemodialysis with N-acetylcysteine infusion and 2-3,dimercaptopropane sulfonate. Clin Tox 1984; 22:31-49.
    165) Ly BT, Williams SR, & Clark RF: Mercuric oxide poisoning treated with whole-bowel irrigation and chelation therapy. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39(3):312-315.
    166) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    167) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    168) Magos L: Effect of 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL) on urinary excretion and brain content of mercury. Br J Ind Med 1968; 25:152-154.
    169) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    170) Marcus S, Okose P, & Jennis T: Untoward effects of oral dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment for lead poisoning (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:376.
    171) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    172) Marinova: Prob Askush I Ginek 1973; 1:75.
    173) Marsh DO, Clarkson TW, & Cox C: Fetal methylmercury poisoning. Relationship between concentration in single strands of maternal hair and child effects. Arch Neurol 1987; 44:1017-1022.
    174) Mason HJ & Calder IM: The correction of urinary mercury concentrations in untimed, random urine samples. Occup Environ Med 1994; 51:287.
    175) Mattison DR: Reproductive Toxicology, Alan R Liss, Inc, New York, NY, 1983, pp 259-281.
    176) McFarland RB & Reigel H: J Occup Med 1978; 20:532-534.
    177) McLauchlan GA: Acute mercury poisoning. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:110-112.
    178) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    179) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    180) Moylan JA: Burn care after thermal injury. Top Emerg Med 1980; 2:39-52.
    181) Murphy MJ, Culliford EJ, & Parsons V: A case of poisoning with mercuric chloride. Resuscitation 1979; 7:35-44.
    182) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    183) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    184) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    185) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    186) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    187) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    234) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    235) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    236) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    237) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    238) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    239) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    240) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    241) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    242) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    243) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    244) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    245) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    246) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    247) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    248) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    249) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    250) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    251) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    252) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    253) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    254) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    255) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    256) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    257) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    258) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    259) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    260) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    261) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    262) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    263) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    264) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    265) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    266) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    267) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    268) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    269) Neilsen JB & Andersen O: Effect of four thio-containing chelators on disposition of orally administered mercuric chloride. Human Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:423-430.
    270) Nelson LS: Copper. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1256-1265.
    271) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    272) Nordberg GF & Skerfving S: Metabolism. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 29-91.
    273) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    274) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    275) Obel N, Hansen B, & Christensen MM: Methyl mercury, mercuric chloride, and silver lactate decrease superoxide anion formation and chemotaxis in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol 1993; 12:361-364.
    276) Oliveira DB, Foster G, & Savill J: Membranous nephropathy caused by mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63:303-304.
    277) Osweiler GD & Hook BS: Mercury. In: JL Howard (Ed.): Current Veterinary Therapy: Food Animal Practice 2, W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp 440-442.
    278) Pai P, Thomas S, Hoenich N, et al: Treatment of a case of severe mercuric salt overdose with DMPS (dimercapo-1-propane sulphonate) and continuous haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(11):1889-1890.
    279) Palmer RB, Godwin DA, & McKinney PE: Transdermal kinetics of a mercurous chloride beauty cream: an in vitro human skin analysis. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38(7):701-707.
    280) Panova Z & Ivanova S: Akush I Ginek 1976; 15:133-17.
    281) Pesce AJ, Hanenson I, & Sethi K: B2 Microglobulinuria in a patient with nephrotoxicity secondary to mercuric chloride ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1977; 11:309-315.
    282) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    283) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    284) Product Information: BAL In Oil intramuscular injection, dimercaprol intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per manufacurer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    285) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Ovation Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Deerfield, IL, 2005.
    286) Product Information: CHEMET(R) oral capsules, succimer oral capsules. Lundbeck Inc. (per Manufacturer), Deerfield, IL, 2011.
    287) Product Information: CUPRIMINE(R) oral capsules, penicillamine oral capsules. Merck & Co,Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2004.
    288) Product Information: DEPEN(R) titratable oral tablets, penicillamine titratable oral tablets. Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Somerset, NJ, 2009.
    289) Product Information: DIMAVAL(R) oral capsules, (RS)-2,3-bis(sulphanyl)propane-1-sulphonic acid, sodium salt-monohydrate oral capsules. Heyl Chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH & Co., 2004.
    290) Product Information: Dimaval(R) intravenous intramuscular injection solution, 2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)propane-1-sulfonic acid intravenous intramuscular injection solution. Heyl Chem.-pharm. Fabrik (per manufacturer), Berlin, Germany, 2013.
    291) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1992; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    292) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    293) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    294) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    295) Roberts JR: Minor burns (Pt II). Emerg Med Ambulatory Care News 1988; 10:4-5.
    296) Robison SH: Mutat Res 1984; 131:172-181.
    297) Rosa FW: Teratogen update: penicillamine. Teratology 1986; 33:127-131.
    298) Rosenmann KD, Valciukas JA, & Glickman L: Sensitive indicators of inorganic mercury toxicity. Arch Environ Health 1986; 41:208-215.
    299) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    300) Sallsten G, Barregard L, & Wikkelso C: Mercury and proteins in cerebrospinal fluid in subjects exposed to mercury vapor. Environ Res 1994; 65:195-206.
    301) Sauder P, Livardjani F, & Jaeger A: Acute mercury chloride intoxication: effects of hemodialysis and plasma exchange on mercury kinetics. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:189-197.
    302) Seidel J: Acute mercury poisoning after polyvinyl alcohol preservative ingestion. Pediatrics 1980; 66:132-143.
    303) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    304) Sharma AK, Kapadia AG, & Fransis P: Reversible effects of mercuric chloride on reproductive organs of the male mouse. Reprod Toxicol 1996; 10:153-159.
    305) Shenker BJ, Berthold P, & Rooney C: Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes. III. Alaterations in B-cell function and viability. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 1993; 15:87-112.
    306) Sherlock J, Hislop J, & Newton D: Elevation of mercury in human blood from controlled chronic ingestion of methylmercury in fish. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3:117-131.
    307) Shtenberg AI & Safronova AM: Vopr Pitan 1979; 5:53-57.
    308) Singer AJ, Mofenson HC, & Caraccio TR: Mercuric chloride poisoning due to ingestion of a stool fixative. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:577-582.
    309) Singer R, Valciukas JA, & Rosenman KD: Peripheral neurotoxicity in workers exposed to inorganic mercury compounds. Arch Environ Health 1987; 42:181-184.
    310) Skerfving S & Vostal J: Symptoms and signs of intoxication. In: L Friberg & J Vostal (Eds): Mercury in the Environment, CRC PRESS, Cleveland, OH, 1972, pp 93-107.
    311) Smith PJ: Br J Ind Med 1983; 40:413-419.
    312) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    313) Snodgrass W, Sullivan JB, & Rumack B: Mercury poisoning from home gold ore processing. JAMA 1981; 246:1929-1931.
    314) Soleo L, Urbano ML, & Petrera V: Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on psychological performance. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:105-109.
    315) Solomon L, Abrams G, & Dinner M: Neonatal abnormalities associated with d-penicillamine treatment during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:54.
    316) Soo YO, Chow KM, Lam CW, et al: A whitened face woman with nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41(1):250-253.
    317) Stack T, Bissenden JG, & Hoffman G: Mercuric chloride poisoning in a 23 month old child. Br Med J 1983; 287:1513.
    318) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    319) Stewart WK, Guirgis HA, & Sanderson J: Urinary mercury excretion and proteinuria in pathology laboratory staff. Br J Ind Med 1977; 34:26-31.
    320) Stremski E, Yousif J & Furbee B: Mercurous perhclorate burns producing elevated blood mercury (Hg) levels, treatment with dimercaptosuccinate (DMSA) (abstract). North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology-94, Salt Lake City, UT, Sept 23-36, 1994.
    321) Sue Y: Mercury. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (EDS): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 5th ed, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1994, pp 1051-1062.
    322) Suter KE: Mutat Res 1975; 30:365-374.
    323) Suzuki T, Hongo T, & Matsuo N: An acute mercuric mercury poisoning:chemical speciation of hair mercury shows a peak of inorganic mercury value. Hum Exp Toxicol 1992; 11:53-57.
    324) Tang HL, Chu KH, Mak YF, et al: Minimal change disease following exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream. Hong Kong Med J 2006; 12(4):316-318.
    325) Tang HL, Mak YF, Chu KH, et al: Minimal change disease caused by exposure to mercury-containing skin lightening cream: a report of 4 cases. Clin Nephrol 2013; 79(4):326-329.
    326) Temesvari E & Daroczy J: Histological examination of immediate and delayed contact allergy provoked by mercuric chloride. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21:271-272.
    327) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    328) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    329) Toet AE, Vandijk A, & Savelkoul TJF: Mercury kinetics in a case of severe mercuric chloride poisoning treated with dimercapto-1-propane sulphonate (DMPS). Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13(1):11-16.
    330) Toet AE, van Dijk A, & Savelkoul TJF: A case of severe mercury chloride poisoning treated with dimercapto-1-propane sulphonate (DMPS) (abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 14.
    331) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    332) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    333) Tsuchiya H, Mitani K, & Dodama K: Placental transfer of heavy metals in normal pregnant Japanese women. Arch Environ Health 1984; 39:11-17.
    334) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    335) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    336) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    337) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    338) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    339) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    340) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Mercury compounds. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/mercury.html. As accessed 2011-05-03.
    341) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    342) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    343) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    344) US DHHS: Mercury Toxicity, Monograph 17. ATSDR Case Studies in Environmental Medicine, 1992.
    345) US DHHS: Toxicological profile for mercury (update). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1994.
    346) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    347) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    348) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    349) Van Tittelboom T, Mostin M, & Govaerts-Lepicard M: A propos de deux cas d'intoxication a la pommade mercurielle. J Toxicol Clin Exp 1985; 5:185-193.
    350) Vena GA, Foti C, & Grandolfo M: Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:214-216.
    351) Verma S, Kumar R, Khadwal A, et al: Accidental inorganic mercury chloride poisoning in a 2-year old child. Indian J Pediatr 2010; Epub:Epub.
    352) Verpooten GF, Nuyts GD, & Hoylaerts MF: Immunoassay in urine of a specific marker for proximal tubular S3 segment. Clin Chem 1992; 38:642-647.
    353) Wang RY, Henry GC, & Fine J: Mercuric chloride poisonings from stool fixative ingestion (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:341.
    354) Weinstein M & Bernstein S: Pink ladies: mercury poisoning in twin girls (letter). Canadian Med Assoc J 2003; 168(2):201.
    355) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    356) Wiechelt-Butler R, Dean BS, & Krenzelok EP: Effective use of dimercaprol/N-acetylcysteine therapy in profound pediatric mercuric chloride poisoning (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:342.
    357) Will VK, Burton BT, & Magnusson AR: Mercuric chloride: intravenous (IV) injection resulting in transient anuric renal failure (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:388.
    358) Winek CL, Fochtman FW, & Bricker JD: Fatal mercuric chloride ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:261-266.
    359) Winfield SA, Boyd ND, & Vimy MJ: Measurement of total mercury in biological specimens by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Clin Chem 1994; 40:206-210.
    360) Winship KA: Toxicity of mercury and its inorganic salts. Adv Drug React 1985; 3:129-160.
    361) Winstanley R, Patel I, & Fischer E: The determination of toxic metals in simulated stomach contents by energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence analysis and a fatal case of mercury poisoning. Forensic Sci Int 1987; 35:181-187.
    362) Woods JS, Martin MD, & Naleway CA: Urinary porphyrin profiles as a biomarker of mercury exposure: studies on dentists with occupational exposure to mercury vapor. J Toxicol Environ Health 1993; 235-246.
    363) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    364) Yang JM, Jiang XZ, & Chen QY: The distribution of HgCl2 in rat body and its effects on fetus. Biomed Environ Sci 1996; 9:437-442.
    365) Yeates KO & Mortensen ME: Acute and chronic neuropsychological consequences of mercury vapor poisoning in two early adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994; 16:209-222.
    366) Yonaga T & Morita K: Comparison of the effect of N-(2,3-dimercaptopropyl) phthalamidic acid, DL-penicillamine and dimercaprol on the excretion and tissue retention of mercury in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1981; 57:197-207.
    367) Yoshida M, Watanabe C, & Satoh H: Milk transfer and tissue uptake of mercury in suckling offspring after exposure of lactating maternal guinea pigs to inorganic or methylmercury. Arch Toxicol 1994; 68:174-178.
    368) ZASUKHINA GD: MUTAT RES 1983; 124:163-173.
    369) Zalups RK, Gelein RM, & Cernichiari E: DMPS as a rescue agent for the nephropathy induced by mercuric chloride. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991; 256:1-10.
    370) Zhang L, Liu F, Peng Y, et al: Nephrotic syndrome of minimal change disease following exposure to mercury-containing skin-lightening cream. Ann Saudi Med 2014; 34(3):257-261.
    371) Zwiener RJ, Kurt TL, & Ghali F: Potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in a child with mercury poisoning. J Ped Gastro Nutrition 1994; 19:242-245.