MOBILE VIEW  | 

MEPERIDINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Meperidine is a narcotic analgesic with actions similar to morphine, primarily analgesia and sedation.

Specific Substances

    1) Ethyl 1-methyl-4-phenylisonipecotate hydrochloride
    2) Ethyl 1-methyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylate hydrochloride
    3) Pethidine
    4) Pethidine hydrochloride
    5) Meperidine hydrochloride
    6) CAS 57-42-1 (meperidine)
    7) CAS 50-13-5 (meperidine hydrochloride)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) MEPERIDINE: C15H21NO2
    2) MEPERIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE: C15H21NO2.HCl

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Meperidine is available as a parenteral solution (10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/mL), as well as a syrup (50 mg/5 mL), solution (50 mg/5 mL), and tablets (50 and 100 mg) for oral administration (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info DEMEROL(R) injection, 2005; Prod Info Demerol(R), 2002).
    B) USES
    1) Meperidine is a narcotic analgesic used for the relief of moderate to severe pain, for obstetrical analgesia, as a preoperative medication, and for support of anesthesia (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Meperidine is a narcotic analgesic used for the relief of moderate to severe pain, obstetrical analgesia, as a preoperative medication, and for support of anesthesia.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Meperidine is a mu and kappa opioid agonist. In therapeutic doses, it produces euphoria and analgesia.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects. Meperidine has an active metabolite (normeperidine) which may accumulate after repeated high doses or in patients with renal failure and cause seizures and myoclonus. Meperidine inhibits serotonin uptake and may also precipitate serotonin syndrome in combination with other serotonergic drugs.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Meperidine overdose is uncommon as the medication is decreasingly used. Severe toxicity can occur.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Lightheadedness, dizziness, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and sweating. OTHER EFFECTS: Asthenia, confusion, headache, weakness, syncope, constipation, dry mouth, seizures, tremors, myoclonus, delirium, euphoria, dysphoria, agitation, transient hallucinations and disorientation, urinary retention, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, palpitations, pruritus, flushing, urticaria, injection site pain and irritation, visual disturbances, anaphylactic reactions, muscle rigidity, biliary tract spasm, and respiratory depression. Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Lightheadedness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, sedation, and disorientation.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Higher doses and longer-term administration have been associated with central nervous system excitatory effects such as agitation, tremors, myoclonus, motor weakness, and seizures. Excitatory symptoms are thought to be due to the metabolite, normeperidine, which has a longer half-life than the parent compound and thus accumulates with frequently repeated high dose use of meperidine. Respiratory and CNS depression can occur from large doses. Meperidine can cause signs of serotonin toxicity such as muscle rigidity, tremor, confusion, behavioral changes, and autonomic instability usually when used with other serotonergic drugs. A syndrome closely resembling moderate to severe idiopathic Parkinson's disease has been described in intravenous and intranasal drug users following use of a derivative of meperidine, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Orofacial dyskinesias, arm flexion, and stiffening of the legs have been observed.
    3) DRUG INTERACTION: Concomitant administration with monoamine oxidase inhibitors can cause a severe reaction (eg, hyperthermia, hypertension, muscle rigidity, coma, mental status changes, seizures, death). Meperidine may precipitate serotonin syndrome when administered with other serotonergic drugs.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Meperidine is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. It is known to cross the placenta and can produce physical dependence and withdrawal, growth retardation, and neonatal respiratory depression. Meperidine should not be used during the labor period.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential of meperidine in humans.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor for decreased respiratory rate, decreased oxygen saturation, or other signs of respiratory depression.
    B) Monitor level of consciousness or arousability for CNS depression.
    C) Monitor for tremors, myoclonic jerking or seizures as an indication of normeperidine accumulation.
    D) Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or repeated seizure activity.
    E) Plasma meperidine levels are not clinically useful to guide therapy. Treatment is based on clinical presentation than on specific laboratory data.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may need only observation for CNS excitation or depression and respiratory depression.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for respiratory or CNS depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury. Treat seizures with benzodiazepines.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Prehospital decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    2) HOSPITAL: Activated charcoal is not routinely administered in these patients because they are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression and subsequent aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis. Gastric lavage is generally not recommended.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with CNS depression not responsive to naloxone, recurrent seizures or severe CNS excitation, and the inability to protect their own airway.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) Naloxone can be given intravascularly, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intranasally or endotracheally. The usual dose is 0.4 to 2 mg IV. In patients with suspected opioid dependence, incremental doses of 0.2 mg IV should be administered, titrated to reversal of respiratory depression and coma, to avoid precipitating acute opioid withdrawal. Doses may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg. Very high doses are rarely needed. DURATION of effect is usually 1 to 2 hours. Meperidine has a longer duration of effect, so it is necessary to observe the patient at least 4 hours after the last dose of naloxone to ensure that the patient does not have recurrent symptoms of toxicity. Naloxone can precipitate withdrawal in an opioid-dependent patients, which is usually not life-threatening; however it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient. Naloxone will not treat meperidine-induced seizures or myoclonus.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) Administer a benzodiazepine for initial control. Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures are not controlled with benzodiazepines. Hyperthermia, lactic acidosis, and muscle destruction may necessitate use of neuromuscular blocking agents with continuous EEG monitoring.
    G) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Administer IV fluids and place patient in supine position. If unresponsive to these measures, administer vasopressors and titrate as need to desired response. Direct acting agents (norepinephrine, epinephrine, phentolamine) are theoretically preferred.
    H) SEROTONIN SYNDROME
    1) Benzodiazepines (lorazepam 1 to 2 mg IV every 5 to 10 minutes titrated to sedation and decreased rigidity) are the mainstay of therapy. Cyproheptadine, a 5-HT antagonist, is also commonly used. Severe cases have been managed with benzodiazepine sedation and neuromuscular paralysis with non-depolarizing agents.
    I) HYPERTHERMIA
    1) Control agitation and muscle activity. Undress patient and enhance evaporative heat loss by keeping skin damp and using cooling fans. Ice water immersion may be needed in severe cases. Muscle activity: Benzodiazepines are the drug of choice to control agitation and muscle activity. Non-depolarizing paralytics may be used in severe cases.
    J) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild-moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic intervention is usually not necessary.
    K) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Methods to enhance elimination are not likely to be useful because of the large volume of distribution.
    L) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid-naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid-naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions and all children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4 hours, as peak plasma levels and symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with significant persistent central nervous depression should be admitted to the hospital. Patients needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as they may have taken a longer-acting opioid and may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, or delirium or those needing a naloxone infusion or intubated patients should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    M) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Other causes of altered mental status must be ruled out, such as hypoxia or hypoglycemia.
    N) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Oral absorption varies; intramuscular absorption 57%, intranasal 78%. Hepatic metabolism (50% first pass effect) with renal elimination of metabolites. The metabolite normeperidine is responsible for myoclonus and seizures; it accumulates with repeated large doses and in patients with renal failure. Vd: 3 to 5 L/kg. Protein binding: 65% to 80%. Meperidine half-life: 3.2 to 3.7 hours; normeperidine half-life: 24 to 48 hours.
    O) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Overdose with other sedating agents (eg, ethanol, benzodiazepine/barbiturate, antipsychotics); overdose with central alpha 2 agonists (eg, clonidine, tizanidine, imidazoline decongestants); CNS infection; intracranial hemorrhage; hypoglycemia or hypoxia.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Inhalation of opioids may result from drug abuse of persons crushing and "snorting" tablets. Clinical effects and treatment is based on the oral route of exposure.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Meperidine-related seizures have been reported with patient-controlled analgesia pump administration. One retrospective review has shown that patients who receive more than 10 mg/kg/day of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) meperidine are at higher risk of central nervous system excitatory effects. A 17-year-old girl developed coma after ingesting 15 g of meperidine. She later experienced seizures, tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, including naloxone, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSES: ADULTS: 50 to 150 mg every 3 to 4 hours as necessary, given IM, orally, or SubQ. CHILDREN: Pain: 1.1 to 1.8 mg/kg orally, up to the adult dose, every 3 or 4 hours as necessary. Premedication for procedure: 1.1 to 2.2 mg/kg IM or SubQ 30 to 90 minutes before anesthesia.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Meperidine is a narcotic analgesic used for the relief of moderate to severe pain, obstetrical analgesia, as a preoperative medication, and for support of anesthesia.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Meperidine is a mu and kappa opioid agonist. In therapeutic doses, it produces euphoria and analgesia.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects. Meperidine has an active metabolite (normeperidine) which may accumulate after repeated high doses or in patients with renal failure and cause seizures and myoclonus. Meperidine inhibits serotonin uptake and may also precipitate serotonin syndrome in combination with other serotonergic drugs.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Meperidine overdose is uncommon as the medication is decreasingly used. Severe toxicity can occur.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Lightheadedness, dizziness, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and sweating. OTHER EFFECTS: Asthenia, confusion, headache, weakness, syncope, constipation, dry mouth, seizures, tremors, myoclonus, delirium, euphoria, dysphoria, agitation, transient hallucinations and disorientation, urinary retention, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, palpitations, pruritus, flushing, urticaria, injection site pain and irritation, visual disturbances, anaphylactic reactions, muscle rigidity, biliary tract spasm, and respiratory depression. Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Lightheadedness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, sedation, and disorientation.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Higher doses and longer-term administration have been associated with central nervous system excitatory effects such as agitation, tremors, myoclonus, motor weakness, and seizures. Excitatory symptoms are thought to be due to the metabolite, normeperidine, which has a longer half-life than the parent compound and thus accumulates with frequently repeated high dose use of meperidine. Respiratory and CNS depression can occur from large doses. Meperidine can cause signs of serotonin toxicity such as muscle rigidity, tremor, confusion, behavioral changes, and autonomic instability usually when used with other serotonergic drugs. A syndrome closely resembling moderate to severe idiopathic Parkinson's disease has been described in intravenous and intranasal drug users following use of a derivative of meperidine, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Orofacial dyskinesias, arm flexion, and stiffening of the legs have been observed.
    3) DRUG INTERACTION: Concomitant administration with monoamine oxidase inhibitors can cause a severe reaction (eg, hyperthermia, hypertension, muscle rigidity, coma, mental status changes, seizures, death). Meperidine may precipitate serotonin syndrome when administered with other serotonergic drugs.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Visual disturbances have been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Severe hypotension is possible in the postoperative setting and in patients with decreased ability to maintain blood pressure (eg, reduced blood volume or use of agents such as phenothiazines or certain anesthetics) (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    c) CASE REPORT: A case of acute, profound hypotension (40 mmHg) 5 minutes after the third EPIDURAL injection of 50 mg meperidine was reported. The patient was non-responsive to naloxone and pressors, but stabilized over 24 hours with aggressive fluid and blood replacement. Urine output never recovered and rapid deterioration followed with death on the third post-operative day (Balaban & Slinger, 1989).
    d) STUDY: Meperidine in combination with lidocaine for continuous spinal anesthesia produced more hypotension, as expressed by need for ephedrine infusion, than did lidocaine alone. Elderly patients undergoing surgery for repair of fracture of the femoral neck received either lidocaine alone (mean dose 43 +/- 13 mg) or meperidine (18 +/- 5 mg) plus lidocaine (mean dose 28 +/- 8 mg). Ephedrine infusion was required in 9/19 in the meperidine/lidocaine group vs 2/19 in the lidocaine group (p=0.05) (Maurette et al, 1993).
    e) STUDY: The histamine releasing capabilities of intravenous meperidine, morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil were compared in adult patients undergoing general surgery. No release of histamine was observed following administration of fentanyl or sufentanil (7 mcg/kg and 1.3 mcg/kg, respectively), and no corresponding adverse cardiovascular effects were observed. However, meperidine in mean doses of 4.3 mg/kg IV resulted in elevations in histamine serum levels one minute following administration (3.2 to 49 ng/mL) and caused clinical symptoms of hypotension, tachycardia and erythema in 5 of 16 patients (31%). Morphine (0.6 mg/kg IV) also produced increases in histamine plasma levels (to 12.4 ng/mL) as well as hypotension and tachycardia in 1 of 10 patients treated. The degree of hemodynamic compromise correlated with increases in histamine plasma levels (Flacke et al, 1987).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension may over with severe meperidine overdose (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT - an 8-day-old boy (gestational age of 27 weeks, birth weight 980 g) received a 10-fold overdose of meperidine. The child had received a total of 22 doses of 0.8 mg IV meperidine during the first week of hospital stay. No adverse effects were noted. On day 8 of his hospital stay, the boy received 8 mg of meperidine (without dilution) instead of the prescribed 0.8 mg dose. The patient's blood pressure went from 45 mmHg to 30 mmHg. The child was given three doses of naloxone and a dopamine infusion was started to maintain blood pressure. A plasma meperidine concentration of 2397 ng/mL was measured 5 hours after the overdose. Meperidine was not detectable at 72 hours after the accidental overdose. The child showed normal development at a one year follow-up (Pokela, 1997).
    B) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT - Hypertensive crisis occurred in a 70-year-old woman who received meperidine 10 milligrams per hour (mg/hr) during chemoembolization of a malignant liver carcinoid tumor. Treatment with labetalol hydrochloride, nitroglycerin paste, and enalapril maleate produced only a transient decrease in blood pressure (from 235 to 160 millimeters mercury, rising again to 210). When the meperidine infusion was discontinued, her blood pressure improved. The patient's serotonin level had been elevated by chemoembolization to approximately 100 times a normal level. Meperidine interferes with reuptake of serotonin. The hypertensive crisis was therefore attributed to elevated serotonin, caused by serotonin release from the tumor and concomitant interference of serotonin removal by meperidine (Balestrero et al, 2000).
    b) CASE REPORT - A 55-year-old normotensive woman developed hypertension after receiving meperidine. The patient had undergone a laparotomy for malignant pheochromocytoma. Biopsy produced short bursts of hypertension and extrasystoles. Upon return to ICU her blood pressure rose to 240/140 mmHg and was treated with labetalol 150 mg IV, resulting in a fall of her blood pressure to 75/50 mmHg. Meperidine 50 mg, given IV at this time and during 2 other short periods of labetalol infusion caused no change in blood pressure. Retrospective examination of tracings showed that in the absence of labetalol, meperidine had produced a rise in systolic blood pressure of 30 to 80 mmHg and in diastolic pressure of 10 to 30 mmHg. The maximum pressures developed over 4 minutes and lasted about 10 minutes (Lawrence, 1978).
    C) SYNCOPE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Syncope has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    D) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Apnea, circulatory collapse, cardiac arrest, and death may occur with an overdose, especially by the intravenous route (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    E) TACHYCARDIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Tachycardia has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    c) The histamine releasing capabilities of IV meperidine, morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil were compared in adult patients undergoing general surgery. No release of histamine was observed following administration of fentanyl or sufentanil (7 mcg/kg and 1.3 mcg/kg, respectively), and no corresponding adverse cardiovascular effects were observed. However, meperidine in mean doses of 4.3 mg/kg IV resulted in elevations in histamine serum levels 1 minute following administration (3.2 to 49 ng/mL) and caused clinical symptoms of hypotension, tachycardia, and erythema in 5 of 16 patients (31%). Morphine (0.6 mg/kg IV) also produced increases in histamine plasma levels (to 12.4 ng/mL) as well as hypotension and tachycardia in 1 of 10 patients treated. The degree of hemodynamic compromise correlated with increases in histamine plasma levels (Flacke et al, 1987).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachycardia has been reported with meperidine overdose (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    F) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Bradycardia has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Bradycardia may occur with severe meperidine overdose (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    G) PALPITATIONS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Palpitations have been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DECREASED RESPIRATORY FUNCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Respiratory depression has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Equivalent analgesic doses of morphine and meperidine are reported to cause a comparable degree of respiratory depression which is reversed by naloxone (AMA Department of Drugs, 1986).
    c) A combination of meperidine (25 mg/mL) promethazine (6.5 mg/mL) and chlorpromazine (6.5 mg/mL) as a sedative agent in 95 pediatric patients undergoing various procedures was evaluated (Nahata et al, 1985). Despite the administration of the drug in doses of 0.07 to 0.11 mL/kg (recommended dose, 0.1 mL/kg), 4 patients developed respiratory depression. Three of the patients received recommended or lower than recommended doses. Respiratory arrest occurred in 1 patient given a dose of 0.07 mL/kg, and another patient required naloxone administration. All patients recovered within 10 hours. It appears that even the lowest dose of this combination can result in respiratory arrest and that close monitoring is required following sedation with the combination. Blood pressure, respiratory and pulse rates and clinical status should be monitored for at least 8 hours, every 15 minutes for the first hour, every 30 minutes during the next 2 hours and at least hourly thereafter. The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs recommends that practitioners consider alternatives to this combination, due to its slower onset, longer duration and lack of anxiolytic or amnestic effect (Anon, 1995).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory depression (a decrease in respiratory rate and/or tidal volume, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, cyanosis) may over with severe meperidine overdose (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    b) Respiratory arrest in a patient receiving meperidine by a patient-controlled analgesia pump was reported. This patient had declining renal function with meperidine dosing not adjusted in regard to renal function. In addition to the respiratory arrest, jerking motions were noted for several days before and after the arrest, suggesting normeperidine toxicity (Geller, 1993).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Severe seizures have been reported with the use of meperidine. Patients with preexisting convulsive disorders may experience an aggravation of their condition with the use of meperidine. Patients without a history of convulsive disorders may experience convulsions if doses are increased to substantially above recommended levels due to tolerance (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005). Seizures, including generalized tonic-clonic seizures, appear to be dose-related especially with doses exceeding 200 mg IV within a 2-hour period. The metabolite, normeperidine, appears to be the substance responsible for meperidine-induced seizures. Renal failure and long-term oral meperidine use are risk factors for potential accumulation of this metabolite (Knight et al, 2000; McHugh, 1999; Goetting & Thirman, 1985; Armstrong & Bersten, 1986; Mauro et al, 1986a; Kaiko et al, 1983). Accumulation of high serum levels of normeperidine due to prolonged infusions or repetitive dosing may also increase the risk of convulsions (Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Seizures resulting from meperidine use are often preceded by myoclonus, are of limited duration, respond to conventional treatment, and resolve following a discontinuation of meperidine. They often occur in patients with renal failure, but have occurred in patients with normal renal function when given in high doses at frequent intervals (Marinella, 1997). Naloxone does not reverse meperidine-induced seizures.
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl was found unconscious approximately 2.5 hours after ingesting 200 meperidine 50 mg tablets (15 g). She presented with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, a heart rate of 130 beats/min, and pinpoint pupils. She improved after 2 mg IV naloxone, but 90 minutes later seized and was intubated. She later developed tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours. The serum meperidine concentration at presentation was 6.5 mg/L and normeperidine was undetectable (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    b) CASE REPORT - A 15-day-old boy received an cumulative overdose of meperidine. The neonate received 8 doses of 1 mg/kg of meperidine over a 45-hour period for post-surgery pain control. After the eighth dose, the boy seized. The seizure was a few minutes in duration. Transient tremor and muscle twitches were also noted. An overdose of meperidine was concluded to be the cause of the seizure (Pokela, 1997).
    c) CASE REPORT - A 26-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with complaints of abdominal pain and headaches. Increasing doses of meperidine were used to treat her pain. Day 10 of hospital stay, the patient experienced bilateral twitching of upper extremities, which developed into tremors in all extremities, and eventually to a tonic clonic seizure lasting one minute in duration. No medical treatment was needed to stop the seizure. The patient had received three 100 mg doses of meperidine and one 10 mg dose of prochlorperazine just minutes prior to the seizure. Review of the patients medication history revealed that she had received 3.1 grams of meperidine prior to hospital admission and 5.4 grams from the time of admission. Plasma meperidine and normeperidine levels were 590 ng/mL and 930 ng/mL, respectively from samples drawn 2 hours prior to the seizure. The seizure was attributed to meperidine as no neurologic findings were noted(Mauro et al, 1986).
    d) CASE REPORT - A 34-year-old woman underwent revision surgery of the left hip to treat recurrent dislocation. Post-operative pain was initially treated with patient-controlled hydromorphone combined with ketorolac. The patients pain was inadequately controlled and the regimen was changed to patient-controlled meperidine 15 mg every 6 minutes as needed. Over a 36-hour period, the patient received approximately 1,500 mg of meperidine. On day 5 post-operation, the patient experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The seizure lasted several minutes and was self-limiting. The patient was taken off meperidine and experienced no further seizures (Beaule et al, 2004).
    e) CASE SERIES - Three cases if meperidine-related seizures were reported with patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCAP) administration of meperidine (Hagmeyer et al, 1993).
    1) A 35-year-old woman was hospitalized for sickle cell crisis. She was initiated on meperidine 150 mg/hour via PCAP, with boluses of 25 mg meperidine every 15 minutes as needed. The patient experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure after approximately 135 hours of receiving meperidine. The patient was given lorazepam 1 mg. A second seizure was noted a few minutes later, which was treated with diazepam 5 mg. Meperidine was withheld and no further seizures occurred. The total dose of meperidine was 21 grams. Meperidine and normeperidine concentrations measured six hours after the seizures were 300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 7450 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    2) A 33-year-old woman was hospitalized for a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The patient was placed on PCAP with meperidine 10 mg every 15 minutes. The dose was titrated to meperidine 30 mg every 15 minutes, with no continuous infusion of meperidine. On post operative day 2, the patient seized for approximately 5 minutes. The patient also became diaphoretic, tachycardic, and combative. Meperidine was discontinued and no further events occurred. The cumulative meperidine dose was 2.7 grams over two days. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured eight hours after the seizure were 1300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1000 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    3) A 22-year-old-man was admitted to the hospital in sickle-cell crisis. He was started on a PCAP with meperidine at 100 mg/hour and on demand boluses of 25 mg every 15 minutes as needed. Day 3, the meperidine dosage was decreased to 75 mg/hour with 25 mg demand doses every 30 minutes as needed. After a cumulative meperidine dose of 7.84 grams over 5 days, the patient experienced two episodes of myoclonic jerks involving his entire body that resolved without treatment. Meperidine was discontinued. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured on Day 5 were 620 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1130 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    f) CASE REPORT - A 46-year-old female developed seizures following a total meperidine intravenous dose of 1500 mg. This dose was administered over 24 hours via PCA pump. Her meperidine serum level at the time of the seizure was 1200 ng/mL (therapeutic range, 70-500 ng/mL) and normeperidine level was 2100 ng/mL (Knight et al, 2000a).
    B) TREMOR
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Tremors have been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) High doses of meperidine (up to 1000 mg daily IM) were associated with tremors and jerking of extremities in a 37-year-old male with pancreatitis and other complications. Withdrawal of the drug resulted in resolution of neurologic symptoms over several days. Similar symptoms occurred in a subsequent hospitalization after high doses of meperidine (up to 1750 mg IM daily for 4 days). The patient also received hydroxyzine in high doses, and it is unclear if meperidine was the sole cause of these effects. However, the metabolite of meperidine (normeperidine) has been associated with CNS toxicity (tremors, myoclonus, seizures). It is suggested that meperidine be avoided in patients requiring large doses of narcotics over a long period of time for pain. Although these effects may be more common in patients with renal failure, the patient described had normal renal function (Morisy & Platti, 1986). Similar toxic effects were reported on a 34-year-old male hospitalized with cirrhosis and pancreatitis. Again, normal renal function was noted, and hydroxyzine was also in use (Danziger et al, 1994).
    c) Tremors, myoclonic jerks, and seizures, including generalized tonic-clonic seizures, have been reported with meperidine. These adverse reactions appear to be dose-related especially with doses exceeding 200 mg IV within a 2-hour period. The metabolite, normeperidine, appears to be the substance responsible for meperidine-induced seizures. Renal failure and long-term oral meperidine use are risk factors for potential accumulation of this metabolite (Knight et al, 2000; McHugh, 1999; Goetting & Thirman, 1985; Armstrong & Bersten, 1986; Mauro et al, 1986a; Kaiko et al, 1983).
    d) A case of CNS toxicity in a cirrhotic patient after multiple days of meperidine use is reported. These toxicities (tremors, agitation, confusion, myoclonus, diaphoresis) may be difficult to differentiate from hepatic encephalopathy (Danziger et al, 1994).
    e) In a prospective survey, myoclonus or grand mal seizures were seen in 10 patients who had a mean plasma normeperidine level of 814 ng/mL (range 424 to 1850 ng/mL). Tremors or twitches were seen in 18 patients who had a mean plasma normeperidine level of 463 ng/mL (range 146 to 1140 ng/mL) (Kaiko et al, 1983).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl was found unconscious approximately 2.5 hours after ingesting 200 meperidine 50 mg tablets (15 g). She presented with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, a heart rate of 130 beats/min, and pinpoint pupils. She improved after 2 mg IV naloxone, but 90 minutes later seized and was intubated. She later developed tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours. The serum meperidine concentration at presentation was 6.5 mg/L and normeperidine was undetectable (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    C) DYSTONIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT - a 6-week-old boy who received 2 doses of meperidine (1mg/kg) experienced a dystonic reaction. Orofacial dyskinesias, arm flexion, and stiffening of the legs were observed. Symptoms did not respond to naloxone but resolved within 36 hours of onset (Saneto et al, 1996).
    D) MYOCLONUS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Myoclonus has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    b) It can cause muscle twitching and myoclonic jerking (Morisy & Platt, 1986; Hagmeyer et al, 1993).
    c) Forty-eight of 67 patients demonstrated agitation, tremors, myoclonus, or seizures following chronic pain therapy with meperidine (Hershley, 1983).
    1) This is attributed to the first metabolite normeperidine (t1/2=14 to 21 hr) rather than meperidine (t1/2=2 to 4 hr). Normeperidine is a CNS stimulant and may accumulate, particularly in patients with renal compromise, sickle cell anemia, and cancer (Szeto et al, 1977a; Wooten, 1992; Armstrong & Bersten, 1986a).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl was found unconscious approximately 2.5 hours after ingesting 200 meperidine 50 mg tablets (15 g). She presented with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, a heart rate of 130 beats/min, and pinpoint pupils. She improved after 2 mg IV naloxone, but 90 minutes later seized and was intubated. She later developed tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours. The serum meperidine concentration at presentation was 6.5 mg/L and normeperidine was undetectable (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    b) CASE REPORT - High doses of meperidine (up to 1000 mg daily IM) were associated with tremors and jerking of extremities in a 37-year-old male with pancreatitis and other complications. Withdrawal of the drug resulted in resolution of neurologic symptoms over several days. Similar symptoms occurred in a subsequent hospitalization after high doses of meperidine (up to 1750 mg IM daily for 4 days). The patient also received hydroxyzine in high doses, and it is unclear if meperidine was the sole cause of these effects. However, the metabolite of meperidine (normeperidine) has been associated with CNS toxicity (tremors, myoclonus, seizures). It is suggested that meperidine be avoided in patients requiring large doses of narcotics over a long period of time for pain. Although these effects may be more common in patients with renal failure, the patient described had normal renal function (Morisy & Platti, 1986). Similar toxic effects were reported on a 34-year-old male hospitalized with cirrhosis and pancreatitis (Danziger et al, 1994). Again, normal renal function was noted, and hydroxyzine was also in use.
    E) SEDATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sedation is one of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of meperidine and may be more common in ambulatory patients or patients with mild to moderate pain (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Extreme somnolence progressing to stupor or coma may over with severe meperidine overdose (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    F) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dizziness is one of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of meperidine and may be more common in ambulatory patients or patients with mild to moderate pain (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    G) LIGHTHEADEDNESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Lightheadedness is one of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of meperidine and may be more common in ambulatory patients or patients with mild to moderate pain (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    H) ASTHENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Weakness has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    I) EEG FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Meperidine has been shown to induce short-term changes in electroencephalographic tracings. When used in preterm infants at 1 mg/kg IV for sedation/analgesia during intubation, acute decreases in variability and marked increases in discontinuity were observed. The possibility of drug-induced EEG changes should be considered during monitoring (Eaton et al, 1992).
    J) SEROTONIN SYNDROME
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Symptoms associated with serotonin syndrome (muscle rigidity, tremor, confusion, behavioral changes, and autonomic instability) have been reported in cases involving meperidine use along with other serotonergic medications (Tissot, 2003; Dougherty et al, 2002; Mason et al, 2000; Zornberg et al, 1991).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man with a history of clompiramine-induced serotonin syndrome 5 years before presentation, developed serotonin syndrome immediately after receiving a single injection of meperidine 30 mg. He experienced dizziness, nausea, numbness of limbs, palpitations, nervousness, mild tremors with clonic jerks, chest pressure, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, and fever. Following supportive care, including IV labetalol, his symptoms gradually improved over the next 30 minutes (Guo et al, 2009).
    K) DISORIENTATED
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Disorientation and confusion have been reported with meperidine use (Prod Info Demerol(R), 2002a; Morisy & Platt, 1986; Tissot, 2003).
    L) PARKINSONISM
    1) A syndrome closely resembling moderate to severe idiopathic Parkinson's disease has been described in intravenous and intranasal drug users following use of a derivative of meperidine, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) (Anon, 1983; Davis et al, 1979; Wright et al, 1984; Tetrud et al, 1989; Stern, 1990; Ross, 1990; Bergman et al, 1998; Przedborski & Jackson-Lewis, 1998).
    2) The MPTP-induced Parkinsonian syndrome is similar to true Parkinson's disease because the clinical syndrome, response to antiparkinsonian medications, loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, and decreased levels of dopamine metabolites in CSF are common to both.
    3) Differences between the two syndromes include more widespread brain pathology, the presence of dementia, and the presence of Lewy bodies in true Parkinsonism but not in the MPTP syndrome (Fruncillo, 1986)
    4) The byproduct of MPTP is a contaminant which produces symptoms of visual hallucinations, jerking of limbs, resting tremors (Tetrud & Langston, 1992), and stiffness within a week of injection. A few days later, generalized slowing and difficulty in moving may be noted.
    5) Symptoms may partially respond to levodopa and/or bromocriptine and usually slowly resolve over 18 months or longer. If recovery does not occur following an acute phase, a chronic and permanent parkinsonian syndrome is observed (Langston, 1985).
    6) Meperidine administration resulting in temporary parkinsonism was reported in a 72-year-old white male, after receiving 4000 mg over nine days. It is postulated that a substance similar to the illicit narcotic MPTP was produced by an alternate metabolic pathway. Withdrawal of the meperidine and temporary use of levodopa resolved the parkinsonian syndrome (Lieberman & Goldstein, 1985).
    M) PARALYSIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sensory motor paralysis, which is usually transitory in nature, may result from inadvertent injection around a nerve trunk (Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Paralysis occurred after inadvertent continuous subdural administration of meperidine. A 63-year-old female had a hysterectomy under epidural anesthetic, and the catheter was left in place for postoperative pain control with meperidine infusing at 7 mL/hr. Motor weakness and partial sensory loss was noted on postoperative day one. The epidural infusion was then discontinued. An MRI revealed a fluid collection with air bubbles in the subdural space as well as multiple compression fractures secondary to osteoporosis, suggesting marked cord compression (Hilgenhurst et al, 1994).
    N) CLOUDED CONSCIOUSNESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Confusion has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info Demerol(R) oral tablets, 2011).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting are 2 of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of meperidine and may be more common in ambulatory patients or patients with mild to moderate pain (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Meperidine was reported to cause nausea in 12.8% (20 of 156 subjects) of patients who received the drug in the emergency department (Silverman et al, 2004).
    c) Nausea and vomiting occurred in 75% of pregnant women when meperidine 15 milligrams or 25 milligrams was administered during labor by the subarachnoid route (Booth et al, 2000).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    C) APTYALISM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dry mouth has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    D) BILIARY COLIC
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Biliary tract spasm has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) A study of 18 patients reported an increase in contraction frequency but no evidence of an increase in sphincter of Oddi pressure following meperidine 1 mg/kg IV. Similarly, a study of 7 patients showed no change in pressure following cumulative doses of meperidine. Conversely, 3 studies showed an increase in sphincter of Oddi pressure, though less than that of morphine. These studies employed measuring methods that were not as reliable (Isenhower & Mueller, 1998).
    c) Due to its spasmogenic effect on intestinal smooth muscle, meperidine may cause biliary tract spasm (AMA Department of Drugs, 1986).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Urinary retention has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SEBORRHEA
    1) Seborrhea is a typical effect of 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP - a meperidine derivative) overdoses and is seen in almost all cases of severe human overdoses (Langston, 1985).
    B) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Pruritus has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    C) SWEATING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sweating is one of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of meperidine and may be more common in ambulatory patients or patients with mild to moderate pain (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    D) FLUSHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Facial flushing has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Histamine release, leading to hypotension and/or tachycardia, flushing, sweating, and pruritus, has been reported in patients receiving meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    E) URTICARIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Urticaria has been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    F) INJECTION SITE REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Pain at the injection site has been reported with the IV administration of meperidine (Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).
    b) Wheal and flare over the vein have been reported with the IV injection of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005). Local tissue irritation and induration have been reported with subQ injection, especially with repeated injections (Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MUSCLE RIGIDITY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Muscle rigidity has been reported in cases of therapeutic use of meperidine (Kitagawa et al, 2006; Dougherty et al, 2002; Saneto et al, 1996; Hagmeyer et al, 1993).
    b) CASE REPORT - A 2-month-old boy developed muscle rigidity of the upper and lower extremities 5 minutes after being injected with meperidine 1 milligram/kilogram (mcg/kg). Twenty-five minutes after the onset of muscle rigidity, the symptoms began to decline, and by 4 hours, the boy had recovered completely. At 2-month follow-up, there were no neurological symptoms or signs (Baris et al, 2000).
    B) MUSCLE TWITCH
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Muscle twitches and other uncoordinated muscle movements have been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl injection, 2005).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANAPHYLAXIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Anaphylaxis, including shock, and other hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with the use of meperidine (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    b) Anaphylactic reactions to narcotics are exceedingly rare. One anaphylactic reaction marked by rapid development of urticaria, bronchospasm, cyanosis, and hypotension was reported. The presence of IgE antibodies immunospecific for meperidine confirmed the diagnosis (Levy & Rockoff, 1982).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Meperidine is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. It is known to cross the placenta and can produce physical dependence and withdrawal, growth retardation, and neonatal respiratory depression. Meperidine should not be used during the labor period.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified meperidine as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    2) Meperidine is known to cross the placenta and can produce respiratory and psychophysiologic depression in the newborn to the extent that resuscitation may be required (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011). Use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy is associated with adverse fetal effects, which include physical dependence and withdrawal, growth retardation, and neonatal respiratory depression (Lee, 1994; Cunningham et al, 1993). Meperidine should not be used in pregnant women prior to the labor period unless the potential benefit outweighs the risk for adverse fetal effects. Neonates and young infants eliminate meperidine more slowly than older children and may be more susceptible to respiratory depression. Meperidine should not be used during the labor period (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Meperidine is excreted in breast milk and the active metabolite, normeperidine, may accumulate with repeat dosing. Given the potentially serious adverse reactions for the nursing infant, such as respiratory depression, the patient should be advised to consider discontinuing the drug or discontinuing breastfeeding (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Ito, 2000). In neonates and young infants, meperidine has a slower elimination rate when compared with older children and adults (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).
    2) Breast-fed infants of mothers receiving meperidine were at a higher risk for neurobehavioral depression than breast-fed infants of mothers given morphine (Ito, 2000).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS57-42-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential of meperidine in humans.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential of meperidine in humans (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor for decreased respiratory rate, decreased oxygen saturation, or other signs of respiratory depression.
    B) Monitor level of consciousness or arousability for CNS depression.
    C) Monitor for tremors, myoclonic jerking or seizures as an indication of normeperidine accumulation.
    D) Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or repeated seizure activity.
    E) Plasma meperidine levels are not clinically useful to guide therapy. Treatment is based on clinical presentation than on specific laboratory data.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with significant persistent central nervous depression should be admitted to the hospital. Patients needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as they may have taken a longer-acting opioid and may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, or delirium or those needing a naloxone infusion or intubated patients should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid-naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid-naive.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) SUMMARY: Patients with deliberate ingestions and all children with ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4 hours, as peak plasma levels and symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    B) Patients should be observed for return of respiratory depression and resedation after naloxone administration. The duration of action for naloxone is approximately 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the dose, route, and the opioid agonist ingested (Howland, 2006).
    C) Patients with intravenous overdose requiring naloxone reversal should be monitored for at least 4 hours after the last dose of naloxone to observe for evidence of pulmonary edema and return of CNS or respiratory depression (Duberstein & Kaufman, 1971; Steinberg & Karlinger, 1968). Patients with oral opioid overdose should be monitored for 6 hours and admitted if signs or symptoms develop. (Wilen et al, 1975; Westerling et al, 1998).
    D) Christenson et al developed criteria for safely discharging patients with presumed opioid overdose one hour after naloxone administration. Confirmation of the following criteria is still needed:
    1) Can mobilize as usual
    2) O2 saturation on room air >92%
    3) Respiratory rate between 10 and 20 breaths/min
    4) Temperature >35.0 and <37.5 degrees C
    5) Heart rate >50 and <100 beats/min
    6) Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15

Monitoring

    A) Monitor for decreased respiratory rate, decreased oxygen saturation, or other signs of respiratory depression.
    B) Monitor level of consciousness or arousability for CNS depression.
    C) Monitor for tremors, myoclonic jerking or seizures as an indication of normeperidine accumulation.
    D) Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or repeated seizure activity.
    E) Plasma meperidine levels are not clinically useful to guide therapy. Treatment is based on clinical presentation than on specific laboratory data.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) PREHOSPITAL: Prehospital decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for CNS depression and seizures.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY: Activated charcoal is not routinely administered in these patients because they are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression and subsequent aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis. Gastric lavage is generally not recommended.
    B) BODY PACKERS/BODY STUFFERS
    1) Refer to "BODY PACKERS" and "BODY STUFFERS" managements for further information.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor for decreased respiratory rate, decreased oxygen saturation, or other signs of respiratory depression.
    2) Monitor level of consciousness or arousability for excess CNS depression.
    3) Monitor for tremors, myoclonic jerking or seizures as an indication of normeperidine accumulation.
    4) Monitor CPK in patients with prolonged coma or repeated seizure activity.
    5) Plasma meperidine levels are not clinically useful to guide therapy. Treatment is based on clinical presentation than on specific laboratory data.
    B) NALOXONE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    3) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of cocaine with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. The arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of a severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    C) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    7) RECURRING SEIZURES
    a) If seizures are not controlled by the above measures, patients will require endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, continuous EEG monitoring, a continuous infusion of an anticonvulsant, and may require neuromuscular paralysis and vasopressor support. Consider continuous infusions of the following agents:
    1) MIDAZOLAM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 0.2 mg/kg slow bolus, at an infusion rate of 2 mg/minute; maintenance doses of 0.05 to 2 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion starting at 1 mcg/kg/minute, titrated upwards every 5 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    2) PROPOFOL: ADULT DOSE: Start at 20 mcg/kg/min with 1 to 2 mg/kg loading dose; maintenance doses of 30 to 200 mcg/kg/minute continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG; caution with high doses greater than 80 mcg/kg/minute in adults for extended periods of time (ie, longer than 48 hours) (Brophy et al, 2012); PEDIATRIC DOSE: IV loading dose of up to 2 mg/kg; maintenance doses of 2 to 5 mg/kg/hour may be used in older adolescents; avoid doses of 5 mg/kg/hour over prolonged periods because of propofol infusion syndrome (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011); caution with high doses greater than 65 mcg/kg/min in children for extended periods of time; contraindicated in small children (Brophy et al, 2012).
    3) PENTOBARBITAL: ADULT DOSE: A loading dose of 5 to 15 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower; may administer additional 5 to 10 mg/kg. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: A loading dose of 3 to 15 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 5 mg/kg/hour (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) THIOPENTAL: ADULT DOSE: 2 to 7 mg/kg, at an infusion rate of 50 mg/minute or lower. Maintenance dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/hour continuous infusing dosing, titrated to EEG (Brophy et al, 2012)
    b) Endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors will be required (Brophy et al, 2012) and consultation with a neurologist is strongly advised.
    c) Neuromuscular paralysis (eg, rocuronium bromide, a short-acting nondepolarizing agent) may be required to avoid hyperthermia, severe acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis. If rhabdomyolysis is possible, avoid succinylcholine chloride, because of the risk of hyperkalemic-induced cardiac dysrhythmias. Continuous EEG monitoring is mandatory if neuromuscular paralysis is used (Manno, 2003).
    D) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    E) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild-moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic intervention is usually not necessary.
    F) SEROTONIN SYNDROME
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of therapy. Cyproheptadine, a 5-HT antagonist, is also commonly used. Severe cases have been managed with benzodiazepine sedation and neuromuscular paralysis with non-depolarizing agents(Claassen & Gelissen, 2005).
    2) HYPERTHERMIA
    a) Control agitation and muscle activity. Undress patient and enhance evaporative heat loss by keeping skin damp and using cooling fans.
    b) MUSCLE ACTIVITY: Benzodiazepines are the drug of choice to control agitation and muscle activity. DIAZEPAM: ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, monitor for respiratory depression and need for intubation. CHILD: 0.25 mg/kg IV every 5 to 10 minutes; monitor for respiratory depression and need for intubation.
    c) Non-depolarizing paralytics may be used in severe cases.
    3) CYPROHEPTADINE
    a) Cyproheptadine is a non-specific 5-HT antagonist that has been shown to block development of serotonin syndrome in animals (Sternbach, 1991). Cyproheptadine has been used in the treatment of serotonin syndrome (Mills, 1997; Goldberg & Huk, 1992). There are no controlled human trials substantiating its efficacy.
    b) ADULT: 12 mg initially followed by 2 mg every 2 hours if symptoms persist, up to a maximum of 32 mg in 24 hours. Maintenance dose 8 mg orally repeated every 6 hours (Boyer & Shannon, 2005).
    c) CHILD: 0.25 mg/kg/day divided every 6 hours, maximum dose 12 mg/day (Mills, 1997).
    4) HYPERTENSION
    a) Monitor vital signs regularly. For mild/moderate asymptomatic hypertension, pharmacologic intervention is usually not necessary.
    5) HYPOTENSION
    a) Administer 10 to 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline bolus and place patient supine. Further fluid therapy should be guided by central venous pressure or right heart catheterization to avoid volume overload.
    b) Pressor agents with dopaminergic effects may theoretically worsen serotonin syndrome and should be used with caution. Direct acting agents (norepinephrine, epinephrine, phentolamine) are theoretically preferred.
    c) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: Add 4 mL of 0.1% solution to 1000 mL of dextrose 5% in water to produce 4 mcg/mL.
    2) INITIAL DOSE
    a) ADULT: 2 to 3 mL (8 to 12 mcg)/minute.
    b) ADULT or CHILD: 0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure.
    3) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    a) 0.5 to 1 mL (2 to 4 mcg)/minute.
    6) SEIZURES
    a) DIAZEPAM
    1) MAXIMUM RATE: Administer diazepam IV over 2 to 3 minutes (maximum rate: 5 mg/min).
    2) ADULT DIAZEPAM DOSE: 5 to 10 mg initially, repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed. Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after diazepam 30 milligrams.
    3) PEDIATRIC DIAZEPAM DOSE: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg, repeat every 5 minutes as needed. Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after diazepam 10 milligrams in children over 5 years or 5 milligrams in children under 5 years of age.
    4) RECTAL USE: If an intravenous line cannot be established, diazepam may be given per rectum (not FDA approved), or lorazepam may be given intramuscularly.
    b) LORAZEPAM
    1) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of IV administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Prod Info Ativan(R), 1991).
    2) ADULT LORAZEPAM DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV. Initial doses may be repeated in 10 to 15 minutes, if seizures persist (Prod Info ATIVAN(R) injection, 2003).
    3) PEDIATRIC LORAZEPAM DOSE: 0.1 mg/kg IV push (range: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg; maximum dose 4 mg); may repeat dose in 5 to 10 minutes if seizures continue. It has also been given rectally at the same dose in children with no IV access (Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008; Wheless, 2004; Qureshi et al, 2002; De Negri & Baglietto, 2001; Mitchell, 1996; Appleton, 1995; Giang & McBride, 1988).
    c) RECURRING SEIZURES
    1) If seizures cannot be controlled with diazepam or recur, give phenobarbital or propofol.
    d) PHENOBARBITAL
    1) SERUM LEVEL MONITORING: Monitor serum levels over next 12 to 24 hours for maintenance of therapeutic levels (15 to 25 mcg/mL).
    2) ADULT PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 600 to 1200 mg of phenobarbital IV initially (10 to 20 mg/kg) diluted in 60 mL of 0.9% saline given at 25 to 50 mg/minute.
    3) ADULT PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Additional doses of 120 to 240 mg may be given every 20 minutes.
    4) MAXIMUM SAFE ADULT PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: No maximum safe dose has been established. Patients in status epilepticus have received as much as 100 mg/min until seizure control was achieved or a total dose of 10 mg/kg.
    5) PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 15 to 20 mg/kg of phenobarbital intravenously at a rate of 25 to 50 mg/min.
    6) PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 10 mg/kg may be given every 20 minutes.
    7) MAXIMUM SAFE PEDIATRIC PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: No maximum safe dose has been established. Children in status epilepticus have received doses of 30 to 120 mg/kg within 24 hours. Vasopressors and mechanical ventilation were needed in some patients receiving these doses.
    8) NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL LOADING DOSE: 20 to 30 mg/kg IV at a rate of no more than 1 mg/kg/min in patients with no preexisting phenobarbital serum levels.
    9) NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL MAINTENANCE DOSE: Repeat doses of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours may be given; adjust dosage to maintain serum levels of 20 to 40 mcg/mL.
    10) MAXIMUM SAFE NEONATAL PHENOBARBITAL DOSE: Doses of up to 20 mg/kg/min up to a total of 30 mg/kg have been tolerated in neonates.
    11) CAUTION: Adequacy of ventilation must be continuously monitored in children and adults. Intubation may be necessary with increased doses.
    7) CHLORPROMAZINE
    a) Chlorpromazine is a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist that has been used to treat cases of serotonin syndrome (Graham, 1997; Gillman, 1996). Controlled human trial documenting its efficacy are lacking.
    b) ADULT: 25 to 100 mg intramuscularly repeated in 1 hour if necessary.
    c) CHILD: 0.5 to 1 mg/kg repeated as needed every 6 to 12 hours not to exceed 2 mg/kg/day.
    8) NOT RECOMMENDED
    a) BROMOCRIPTINE: It has been used in the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome but is NOT RECOMMENDED in the treatment of serotonin syndrome as it has serotonergic effects (Gillman, 1997). In one case the use of bromocriptine was associated with a fatal outcome (Kline et al, 1989).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Methods to enhance elimination are not likely to be useful because of the large volume of distribution.
    2) Hassan et al described successful treatment of normeperidine neurotoxicity by hemodialysis. A patient with renal failure and treated with meperidine for pain experienced a seizure, presumably due to the metabolite, normeperidine, which is not reversed by naloxone. Average blood and plasma clearance of normeperidine during dialysis were 73 mL/min and 50 mL/min, respectively; average percentage of plasma extraction was 24%. Significant improvement occurred after 4 hours of dialysis with resolution of neurotoxicity (Hassan et al, 2000).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Meperidine-related seizures have been reported with patient-controlled analgesia pump administration. One retrospective review has shown that patients who receive more than 10 mg/kg/day of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) meperidine are at higher risk of central nervous system excitatory effects. A 17-year-old girl developed coma after ingesting 15 g of meperidine. She later experienced seizures, tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, including naloxone, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSES: ADULTS: 50 to 150 mg every 3 to 4 hours as necessary, given IM, orally, or SubQ. CHILDREN: Pain: 1.1 to 1.8 mg/kg orally, up to the adult dose, every 3 or 4 hours as necessary. Premedication for procedure: 1.1 to 2.2 mg/kg IM or SubQ 30 to 90 minutes before anesthesia.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) The usual adult dose of meperidine is 50 to 150 mg every 3 to 4 hours as necessary, given IM, SubQ, or orally (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2014; Prod Info Meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection, 2011)
    B) ANESTHESIA SUPPORT: Administer repeated slow IV injections of fractional doses (ie, 10 mg/mL) or as a continuous IV infusion with a more diluted solution (ie, 1 mg/mL) (Prod Info Meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection, 2011).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) INJECTION
    1) PAIN MANAGEMENT: The usual pediatric dose of meperidine is 0.5 to 0.8 mg/pound IM or SubQ every 3 to 4 hours as necessary; do not exceed adult dose (Prod Info Meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection, 2011).
    2) PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION: The usual pediatric dose of meperidine is 0.5 to 1 mg/pound IM or SubQ approximately 30 to 90 minutes before beginning anesthesia (Prod Info Meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection, 2011).
    B) TABLETS
    1) PAIN MANAGEMENT: The usual pediatric dose of meperidine is 1.1 to 1.8 mg/kg orally every 3 to 4 hours as necessary; do not exceed adult dose (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2014).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old boy received meperidine for pain control after an outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. The patient became extremely lethargic after receiving meperidine. The medication was discontinued. Day one post-surgery the patient was found dead at home. Postmortem blood concentrations were as follows: 1.27 mcg/mL meperidine from the heart blood; 0.76 mcg/mL normeperidine from the heart blood; 0.86 mcg/mL meperidine in the CSF; 0.40 mcg/mL normeperidine in the CSF. The cause of death as determined by the medical examiner was meperidine intoxication complicated by pneumonia (Watson et al, 2003).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl was found unconscious approximately 2.5 hours after ingesting 200 meperidine 50 mg tablets (15 g). She presented with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, a heart rate of 130 beats/min, and pinpoint pupils. She improved after 2 mg IV naloxone, but 90 minutes later seized and was intubated. She later developed tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours. The serum meperidine concentration at presentation was 6.5 mg/L and normeperidine was undetectable (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    B) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man with a history of clompiramine-induced serotonin syndrome 5 years before presentation, developed serotonin syndrome immediately after receiving a single dose of meperidine 30 mg injection. He experienced dizziness, nausea, numbness of limbs, palpitations, nervousness, mild tremors with clonic jerks, chest pressure, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, and fever. Following supportive care, including IV labetalol, his symptoms gradually improved after 30 minutes (Guo et al, 2009).
    C) One retrospective review has shown that patients who receive more than 10 mg/kg/day of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) meperidine are at higher risk of central nervous system excitatory effects (Simopoulos et al, 2002).
    D) CASE REPORT: An 8-day old boy (gestational age of 27 weeks, birth weight 980 g) received a 10-fold overdose of meperidine. Meperidine was administered without dilution. The boy received 8 mg of meperidine instead of the prescribed 0.8 mg dose. The only observed adverse effect was a decline in blood pressure. The patient's blood pressure went from 45 mmHg to 30 mmHg. The child was given three doses of naloxone and a dopamine infusion was started to maintain blood pressure. A plasma meperidine concentration of 2397 ng/mL was measured 5 hours after the overdose. Meperidine was not detectable at 72 hours. The child showed normal development at one year of age (Pokela, 1997).
    E) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman was hospitalized with complaints of abdominal pain and headaches. Day 10 of hospital stay, the patient experienced bilateral twitching of upper extremities, which developed into tremors in all extremities, and eventually to a tonic clonic seizure lasting one minute in duration. The seizure abated with out medical treatment. The patient had received 300 mg of meperidine divided into three doses prior to the seizure. Review of the patients medication history revealed that she had received 5.4 grams of meperidine from the time of admission. Plasma meperidine and normeperidine levels were 590 ng/mL and 930 ng/mL, respectively from samples drawn 2 hours prior to the seizure. The seizure was attributed to meperidine as no neurologic findings were noted(Mauro et al, 1986).
    F) CASE SERIES: Three cases if meperidine-related seizures were reported with patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCAP) administration of meperidine (Hagmeyer et al, 1993).
    1) A 35-year-old woman was hospitalized for sickle cell crisis. She was initiated on meperidine 150 mg/hour via PCAP, with boluses of 25 mg meperidine every 15 minutes as needed. The patient experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure after approximately 135 hours of receiving meperidine. The patient was given lorazepam 1 mg. A second seizure was noted a few minutes later, which was treated with diazepam 5 mg. Meperidine was withheld and no further seizures occurred. The total dose of meperidine was 21 grams. Meperidine and normeperidine concentrations measured six hours after the seizures were 300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 7450 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    2) A 33-year-old woman was hospitalized for a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The patient was placed on PCAP with meperidine 10 mg every 15 minutes. The dose was titrated to meperidine 30 mg every 15 minutes, with no continuous infusion of meperidine. Post operation day 2, the patient seized for approximately 5 minutes. The patient also became diaphoretic, tachy cardiac, and combative. Meperidine was discontinued and no further events occurred. The cumulative meperidine dose was 2.7 grams over two days. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured eight hours after the seizure were 1300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1000 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    3) A 22-year-old-man was admitted to the hospital in sickle-cell crisis. He was started on a PCAP with meperidine at 100 mg/hour and on demand boluses of 25 mg every 15 minutes as needed. Day 3, the meperidine dosage was decreased to 75 mg/hour with 25 mg demand doses every 30 minutes as needed. After a cumulative meperidine dose of 7.84 grams over 5 days, the patient experienced two episodes of myoclonic jerks involving his entire body that resolved without treatment. Meperidine was discontinued. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured on Day 5 were 620 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1130 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old girl was found unconscious approximately 2.5 hours after ingesting 200 meperidine 50 mg tablets (15 g). She presented with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3, respiratory rate of 6 breaths/min, a heart rate of 130 beats/min, and pinpoint pupils. She improved after 2 mg IV naloxone, but 90 minutes later seized and was intubated. She later developed tremor, hyperreflexia, myoclonus, clonus, dilated pupils, and tachycardia. Following supportive therapy, she gradually improved over the next 48 hours. The serum meperidine concentration at presentation was 6.5 mg/L and normeperidine was undetectable (Karunatilake & Buckley, 2007).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old boy received meperidine for pain control after an outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. The patient became extremely lethargic after receiving meperidine. The medication was discontinued. Day one post-surgery the patient was found dead at home. Postmortem blood concentrations were as follows: 1.27 mcg/mL meperidine from the heart blood; 0.76 mcg/mL normeperidine from the heart blood; 0.86 mcg/mL meperidine in the CSF; 0.40 mcg/mL normeperidine in the CSF. The cause of death as determined by the medical examiner was meperidine intoxication complicated by pneumonia (Watson et al, 2003).
    3) CASE REPORT - A 26-year-old woman was hospitalized with complaints of abdominal pain and headaches. Increasing doses of meperidine were used to treat her pain. Day 10 of hospital stay, the patient experienced a tonic clonic seizure lasting one minute in duration. Review of the patients medication history revealed that she had received 3.1 grams of meperidine during the 96 hours prior to hospital admission and 5.4 grams since admission. Plasma meperidine and normeperidine levels were 590 ng/mL and 930 ng/mL, respectively from samples drawn 2 hours prior to the seizure(Mauro et al, 1986).
    4) CASE SERIES - Three cases if meperidine-related seizures were reported with patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCAP) administration of meperidine.
    a) A 35-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for sickle cell crisis. She was initiated on meperidine 150 mg/hour via PCAP, with boluses of 25 mg meperidine every 15 minutes as needed. After 135 hours of receiving meperidine, the patient experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The accumulative dose of meperidine was 21 grams. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured six hours after the seizures were 300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 750 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    b) A 33-year-old woman admitted for a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The patient was placed on PCAP with meperidine 10 mg every 15 minutes. The dose was titrated to meperidine 30 mg every 15 minutes, with no continuous infusion of meperidine. Post operation Day 2, the patient seized for approximately 5 minutes. The patient also became diaphoretic, tachy cardiac, and combative. The cumulative meperidine dose was 2.7 grams over two days. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured eight hours after the seizure were 1300 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1000 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.
    c) A 22-year-old man was admitted to the hospital in sickle-cell crisis. He was started on a PCAP with meperidine at 100 mg/hour and on demand boluses of 25 mg every 15 minutes as needed. Day 3, the meperidine dosage was decreased to 75 mg/hour with 25 mg demand doses every 30 minutes as needed. After a cumulative meperidine dose of 7.84 grams over 5 days, the patient experienced two episodes of myoclonic jerks involving his entire body that resolved without treatment. Meperidine and normeperidine blood concentrations measured on Day 5 were 620 ng/mL (therapeutic, 70 - 500 ng/mL) and 1130 ng/mL (toxic, > 480 ng/mL), respectively.

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS57-42-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS57-42-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS57-42-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS57-42-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    1) 162 mg/kg (RTECS, 2006)
    B) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    1) 113 mg/kg (RTECS, 2006)
    C) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    1) 200 mg/kg (RTECS, 2006)
    D) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    1) 112 mg/kg (RTECS, 2006)

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Meperidine produces analgesia by interacting with opioid receptors in the CNS. Opioids interact with stereospecific and saturable binding sites in the CNS and other tissues, with highest concentrations in the limbic system, thalamus, striatum, hypothalamus, midbrain and spinal cord (Snyder et al, 1974; Simon & Hiller, 1978; Gilman et al, 1985). Their effects may result from mimicking the actions of enkephalins, beta-endorphins and other exogenous ligands which have been found to occupy the same binding sites (Gilman et al, 1985). These actions appear to involve alterations in the rate of release of neurotransmitters. In the nervous system, opioids and exogenous peptides inhibit the release of acetylcholine, norepinephrine, and substance P and alter the release of dopamine (Snyder, 1978; Terenius, 1978).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Normeperidine is believed to be responsible for the seizures and myoclonus seen with meperidine intoxication.
    B) HUMAN
    1) Normeperidine may accumulate to high concentrations in patients receiving frequent, high doses of meperidine, and in patients with renal failure (Bennett et al, 1994). Accumulation of normeperidine has been associated with seizures and myoclonus (Verbeeck et al, 1980; Szeto et al, 1977).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Meperidine hydrochloride is a white crystalline substance that has a slightly bitter taste, a melting point of 186 to 189 degrees C, and is readily soluble in water (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, 2011; Prod Info meperidine hcl oral tablets, oral solution, 2005).

Ph

    A) 3.5 to 6 (injection) (Prod Info DEMEROL(R) injection, 2005)

Molecular Weight

    A) MEPERIDINE: 247.34 (Budavari, 1996)
    B) MEPERIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE: 283.8 (Prod Info meperidine hcl oral tablets, oral solution, 2005)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    5) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    6) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    9) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    10) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    11) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    12) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) AMA Department of Drugs: AMA Drug Evaluations, 6th. American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1986.
    15) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    16) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    17) Anon: American Academy of Pediatrics: Reappraisal of lytic cocktail/Demerol(R), Phenergan(R), and Thorazine(R) (DPT) for the sedation of children. Pediatrics 1995; 95:598-601.
    18) Anon: Street drugs yield primative Parkinson's model. JAMA 1983; 250:13-14.
    19) Appleton R: Lorazepam vs diazepam in the acute treatment of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus.. Dev Med Child Neuro 1995; 37:682-688.
    20) Armstrong PJ & Bersten A: Normeperidine toxicity. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:536-538.
    21) Armstrong PJ & Bersten A: Normeperidine toxicity. Anesth Analg 1986a; 65:536-538.
    22) Balaban M & Slinger P: Severe hypotension from epidural meperidine in a high-risk patient after thoracotomy. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36(4):450-453.
    23) Balestrero LM, Beaver CR, & Rigas JR: Hypertensive crisis following meperidine administration and chemoembolization of a carcinoid tumor. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2394-2395.
    24) Baris S, Karakaya D, & Sarihasan B: A dose of 1 mg kg(-1) meperidine causes muscle rigidity in infants? (letter). Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10:684.
    25) Beaule PE, Smith MI, & Nguyen VN: Meperidine-induced seizure after revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(4):516-519.
    26) Bennett WM, Aronoff GR, Golper TA, et alBennett WM, Aronoff GR, Golper TA, et al: Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, 1987.
    27) Bennett WM, Aronoff GR, Golper TA, et alBennett WM, Aronoff GR, Golper TA, et al: Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
    28) Bergman H, Raz A, & Feingold A: Physiology of MPTP tremor. Movement Dis 1998; 13(Suppl 3):29-34.
    29) Booth J, Lindsay DR, Olufolabi AJ, et al: Subarachnoid meperidine (pethidine) causes significant nausea and vomiting during labor. Anesthesiology 2000; 93(2):418-421.
    30) Boreus LO, Skoldefors E, & Ehrnebo M: Appearance of pethidine and norpethidine in cerebrospinal fluid of man following intramuscular injection of pethidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27:222-225.
    31) Boyer EW & Shannon M: The serotonin syndrome. N Eng J Med 2005; 352(11):1112-1120.
    32) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    33) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    34) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Company, Inc, Rahway, NJ, 1996.
    35) Burn JJ: The physiological disposition and the fate of meperidine in man and a method for its estimation in plasma. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1955; 114:289.
    36) Burton AW, Conroy B, & Garcia E: Illicit substance abuse via an implanted intrathecal pump. Anesthesiol 1998; 89:1264-1267.
    37) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    38) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    39) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    40) Christenson J, Etherington J, & Grafstein E: Early discharge of patients with presumed opioid overdose: development of a clinical prediction rule. Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7:1110-1118.
    41) Claassen JAHR & Gelissen HPMM: The serotonin syndrome (letter). N Eng J Med 2005; 352(23):2455.
    42) Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Leveno KF, et alCunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Leveno KF, et al (Eds): Williams Obstetrics, 19th. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1993.
    43) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    44) Danziger LH, Martin SJ, & Blum RA: Central nervous system toxicity associated with meperidine use in hepatic disease. Pharmacotherapy 1994; 14:235-238.
    45) Davis GC, Williams AC, & Markey SP: Chronic Parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatr Res 1979; 1:249-254.
    46) De Negri M & Baglietto MG: Treatment of status epilepticus in children. Paediatr Drugs 2001; 3(6):411-420.
    47) Dougherty JA, Young H, & Shafi T: Serotonin syndrome induced by amitriptyline, meperidine, and venlafaxine. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36(10):1647-1648.
    48) Duberstein JL & Kaufman DM: A clinical study of an epidemic of heroin intoxication and heroin-induced pulmonary edema. Am J Med 1971; 51:704-714.
    49) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    50) Eaton DG, Wertheim D, Oozeer R, et al: The effect of pethidine on the neonatal EEG. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992; 34:155-163.
    51) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    52) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    53) Flacke JW, Flacke WE, Bloor BC, et al: Histamine release by four narcotics: a double-blind study in humans. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:723-730.
    54) Fruncillo RJ: Toxin-induced Parkinsonism: recent developments. Clin Pharmacol 1986; 33:251-254.
    55) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    56) Geller RJ: Meperidine in patient-controlled analgesia: a near-fatal mishap. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:655-657.
    57) Giang DW & McBride MC : Lorazepam versus diazepam for the treatment of status epilepticus. Pediatr Neurol 1988; 4(6):358-361.
    58) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    59) Gillman PK: Ecstasy, serotonin syndrome and the treatment of hyperpyrexia (letter). MJA 1997; 167:109-111.
    60) Gillman PK: Successful treatment of serotonin syndrome with chlorpromazine (letter). MJA 1996; 165:345.
    61) Gilman AG, Goodman LS, & Gilman AGilman AG, Goodman LS, & Gilman A (Eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, 1985.
    62) Goetting MG & Thirman MJ: Neurotoxicity of meperidine. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:1007-1009.
    63) Goldberg RJ & Huk M: Serotonin syndrome from trazodone and buspirone (letter). Psychosomatics 1992; 33:235-236.
    64) Graham PM: Successful treatment of the toxic serotonin syndrome with chlorpromazine (letter). Med J Australia 1997; 166:166-167.
    65) Guo SL , Wu TJ , Liu CC , et al: Meperidine-induced serotonin syndrome in a susceptible patient. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103(3):369-370.
    66) Hagmeyer KO, Mauro LS, & Mauro VF: Meperidine-related seizures associated with patient-controlled analgesia pumps. Ann Pharmacother 1993; 27(1):29-32.
    67) Hassan H, Bastani B, & Gellens M: Successful treatment of normeperidine neurotoxicity by hemodialysis. Am J Kid Dis 2000; 35:146-149.
    68) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    69) Hershley LA: Meperidine and central neurotoxicity. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98:548-549.
    70) Hilgenhurst G, Sukiennik AW, Anderson ML, et al: Paraplegia after continuous subdural meperidine infusion. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:462-466.
    71) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    72) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    73) Howland MA: Opioid Antagonists. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    74) Husemeyer RP, Cummings AJ, Rosankiewicz JR, et al: A study of pethidine kinetics and analgesia in women in labour following intravenous, intramuscular and epidural administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13:171-176.
    75) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    76) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    77) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    78) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    79) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    80) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    81) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    82) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    83) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    84) Isenhower HL & Mueller BA: Selection of narcotic analgesics for pain associated with pancreatitis. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 1998; 55:480-486.
    85) Ito S: Drug therapy for breast-feeding women. NEJM 2000; 343(2):118-126.
    86) Jacobsen J, Flachs H, Dich-Nielsen JO, et al: Comparative plasma concentration profiles after IV, IM, and rectal administration of pethidine in children. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60:623-626.
    87) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    88) Kaiko RF, Foley KM, Grabinski PY, et al: Central nervous system excitatory effects of meperidine in cancer patients. Ann Neurol 1983; 13:180-185.
    89) Kaiser KG & Bainton CR: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:475-477.
    90) Karunatilake H & Buckley NA: Severe neurotoxicity following oral meperidine (pethidine) overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(2):200-201.
    91) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    92) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    93) Kitagawa N, Oda M, & Totoki T: Meperidine-induced muscular rigidity during spinal anesthesia?. Anesth Analg 2006; 103(2):490-491.
    94) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    95) Kline SS, Mauro LS, & Scala-Barnett DM: Serotonin syndrome versus neuroleptic malignant syndrome as a cause of death. Clin Pharmac 1989; 8:510-514.
    96) Klotz U, McHorse TS, Wilkinson GR, et al: The effect of cirrhosis on the disposition and elimination of meperidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974; 16:667-675.
    97) Knight B, Thomson N, & Perry G: Seizures due to norpethidine toxicity. Aust N Z J Med 2000; 30:513.
    98) Knight B, Thomson N, & Perry G: Seizures due to norpethidine toxicity. Aust NZ J Med 2000a; 30:513.
    99) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    100) Langston JW: MPTP neurotoxicity: an overview and characterization of phases of toxicity. Life Sciences 1985; 36:201-206.
    101) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    102) Lawrence CA: Pethidine-induced hypertension in phaeochromocytoma. Br Med J 1978; 21:149-150.
    103) Lee RV: Drug abuse In: Burrow GN & Ferris TF (Eds): Medical Complications During Pregnancy, 4th. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
    104) Levy JH & Rockoff MA: Anaphylaxis to meperidine. Anesth Analg 1982; 3:301-303.
    105) Lieberman AN & Goldstein M: Reversible parkinsonism related to meperidine (letter). N Engl J Med 1985; 312(8):509.
    106) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    107) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    108) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    109) Marinella MA: Meperidine-induced generalized seizures with normal renal function. South Med J 1997; 90:556-558.
    110) Mason PJ, Morris VA, & Balcezak TJ: Serotonin syndrome. Presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000; 79(4):201-209.
    111) Mather LE, Tucker GT, Pflug AE, et al: Meperidine kinetics in man: intravenous injection in surgical patients and volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975; 17:21-30.
    112) Maurette P, Bonada G, Djiane V, et al: A comparison between lidocaine alone and lidocaine with meperidine for continuous spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1993; 18(5):290-295.
    113) Maurette P, Tauzin-Fin P, Vincon G, et al: Arterial and ventricular CSF pharmacokinetics after intrathecal meperidine in humans. Anesthesiology 1989; 70:961-966.
    114) Mauro VF, Bonfiglio MF, & Spunt AL: Meperidine-induced seizure in a patient without renal dysfunction or sickle cell anemia. Clin Pharm 1986; 5(10):837-839.
    115) Mauro VF, Bonfiglio MF, & Spunt AL: Meperidine-induced seizure in a patient without renal dysfunction or sickle cell anemia. Clin Pharm 1986a; 5:837-839.
    116) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    117) McHorse TS, Wilkinson GR, Johnson RF, et al: Effects of acute viral hepatitis in man on the disposition and elimination of meperidine. Gastroenterology 1975; 68:775-780.
    118) McHugh GJ: Norpethidine accumulation and generalized seizure during pethidine patient-controlled analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999; 27(3):289-291.
    119) Mills KC: Serotonin syndrome: a clinical update. Med Toxicol 1997; 13:763-783.
    120) Mitchell WG: Status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children, adolescents, and young adults: etiology, outcome, and treatment. Epilepsia 1996; 37(S1):S74-S80.
    121) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    122) Morisy L & Platt D: Hazards of high-dose meperidine. JAMA 1986; 255(4):467-468.
    123) Morisy L & Platti D: Hazards of high-dose meperidine. JAMA 1986; 255:467-468.
    124) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    125) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    126) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    127) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    128) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    129) Nahata MC, Clotz MA, & Krogg EA: Adverse effects of meperidine, promethazine and chlorpromazine for sedation in pediatric patients. Clin Pediatr 1985; 24:558-560.
    130) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    131) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    132) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    133) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    134) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    135) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    136) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    137) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    138) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    139) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    140) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    141) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    142) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    143) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    144) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    145) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    146) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    147) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    148) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    205) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    206) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    207) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    208) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    209) Odar-Cederlof I, Boreus LO, Bondesson U, et al: Comparison of renal excretion of pethidine (meperidine) and its metabolites in old and young patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 28(2):171-175.
    210) Osol A & Hoover JE (Eds): Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th ed. Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA, USA, 1975.
    211) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    212) Persson MP, Hartvig P, Wiklund L, et al: Pulmonary disposition of pethidine in postoperative patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 25:235-241.
    213) Pokela ML: Overdoses of pethidine given to two preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86(3):323-325.
    214) Product Information: ATIVAN(R) injection, lorazepam injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 2003.
    215) Product Information: DEMEROL(R) injection, meperidine hcl injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2005.
    216) Product Information: DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, meperidine HCl oral tablets. sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC (per DailyMed), Bridgewater, NJ, 2014.
    217) Product Information: DEMEROL(R) oral tablets, meperidine HCl oral tablets. sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, 2011.
    218) Product Information: Demerol(R) oral tablets, meperidine HCl oral tablets. sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC (per FDA), Bridgewater, NJ, 2011.
    219) Product Information: Demerol(R), meperidine hydrochloride. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc., New York, NY, 2002.
    220) Product Information: Demerol(R), meperidine hydrochloride. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc., New York, NY, 2002a.
    221) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    222) Product Information: Meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection, meperidine HCl intramuscular subcutaneous intravenous injection. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    223) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    224) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    225) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    226) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    227) Product Information: meperidine hcl injection, meperidine hcl injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2005.
    228) Product Information: meperidine hcl oral tablets, oral solution, meperidine hcl oral tablets, oral solution. Roxane Laboratories,Inc, Columbus, OH, 2005.
    229) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    230) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    231) Przedborski S & Jackson-Lewis V: Mechanisms of MPTP toxicity. Movement Dis 1998; 13(Suppl 1):35-38.
    232) Qureshi A, Wassmer E, Davies P, et al: Comparative audit of intravenous lorazepam and diazepam in the emergency treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. Seizure 2002; 11(3):141-144.
    233) RTECS: Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2006; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    234) Rayburn W, Leuschen P, Earl R, et al: Intravenous meperidine during labor: a randomized comparison between nursing- and patient-controlled administration. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:702-706.
    235) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    236) Ross RT: Drug-induced parkinsonism and other movement disorders. Can J Neurol Sci 1990; 17:155-162.
    237) Rossiter A & Souney PF: Interaction between MAOIs and opioids: pharmacologic and clinical considerations. Hosp Formul 1993; 28:692-698.
    238) Saneto RP, Fitch JA, & Cohen BH: Acute neurotoxicity of meperidine in an infant. Pediatr Neurol 1996; 14(4):339-341.
    239) Savona-Ventura C, Sammut M, & Sammut C: Pethidine blood concentrations at time of birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 36:103-107.
    240) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    241) Silverman ME, Shih RD, & Allegra J: Morphine induces less nausea than meperidine when administered parenterally. J Emerg Med 2004; 27(3):241-243.
    242) Simon EJ & Hiller JMI: The opiate receptors. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1978; 18:371-394.
    243) Simopoulos TT , Smith HS , Peeters-Asdourian C , et al: Use of meperidine in patient-controlled analgesia and the development of a normeperidine toxic reaction. Arch Surg 2002; 137(1):84-88.
    244) Snyder SH, Pert CB, & Posternak GW: The opiate receptor. Ann Intern Med 1974; 81:534-540.
    245) Snyder SH: The opiate receptor and morphine-like peptides in the brain. Am J Psychiatry 1978; 135:645-652.
    246) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    247) Stambaugh JE: The clinical pharmacology of meperidine -- comparison of routes of administration. J Clin Pharmacol 1976; 16:245.
    248) Steinberg AD & Karlinger JS: The clinical spectrum of heroin pulmonary edema. Arch Intern Med 1968; 122:122-127.
    249) Stern Y: MPTP-induced Parkinsonism. Progress Neurobiol 1990; 34:107-114.
    250) Sternbach H: The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatr 1991; 148:705-713.
    251) Striebel WH, Malewicz J, Hermanns K, et al: Intranasal meperidine titration for postoperative pain relief. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:1047-1051.
    252) Szeto HA, Inturrisi CE, & Houde R: Accumulation of normeperidine, an active metabolite of meperidine, in patients with renal failure or cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977a; 86:738-741.
    253) Szeto HH, Inturrisi CE, Houde R, et al: Accumulation of normeperidine - an active metabolite of meperidine in patients with renal failure or cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977; 86:738-741.
    254) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    255) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    256) Terenius S: Endogenous peptides and analgesia. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1978; 18:189-204.
    257) Tetrud JW & Langston JW: Tremor in MPTP-induced parkinsonism. Neurology 1992; 42:407-410.
    258) Tetrud JW, Langston JW, & Garbe PL: Mild parkinsonism in persons exposed to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Neurology 1989; 39:1483-1487.
    259) Tissot TA: Probable meperidine-induced serotonin syndrome in a patient with a history of fluoxetine use. Anesthesiology 2003; 98(6):1511-1512.
    260) Tomson G, Garle RIM, Thalme B, et al: Maternal kinetics and transplacental passage of pethidine during labour. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13:653-659.
    261) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    262) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    263) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    264) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    265) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    266) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    267) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    268) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    269) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    270) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    271) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    272) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    273) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    274) Verbeeck RK, Branch RA, & Wilkinson SR: Meperidine disposition in young adult men. Pharmacologist 1980; 22:230.
    275) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    276) Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Rodgers GC, et al: 2002 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg Med 2003; 21(5):353-421.
    277) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    278) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    279) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    280) Westerling D, Sawe J, & Eklundh G: Near fatal intoxication with controlled- release morphine tablets in a depressed woman. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42:586-589.
    281) Wheless JW : Treatment of status epilepticus in children. Pediatr Ann 2004; 33(6):376-383.
    282) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    283) Wilen SB, Ulreich S, & Rabinowitz JG: Roentgenographic manifestations of methodone-induced pulmonary edema. Radiology 1975; 114:51-55.
    284) Wooten JM: Meperidine-induced neurotoxicity. Intern Med Alert 1992; 14:23.
    285) Wright JM, Wall RA, & Perry TL: Chronic parkinsonism secondary to intranasal administration of a product of meperidine-analogue synthesis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:325.
    286) Zornberg GL, Bodkin JA, & Cohen BM: Severe adverse interaction between pethidine and selegiline.. Lancet 1991; 337:246.
    287) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    288) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.