MOBILE VIEW  | 

LYME DISEASE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystem tickborne spirochetal infection (Borrelia burgdorferi) involving the skin, nervous system, heart, and joints. It is transmitted to humans by bite of infected Ixodes genus. It is the most common vector-borne illness in North America.

Specific Substances

    A) CONSTITUENTS OF THE GROUP
    1) Amblyomma americanum ticks
    2) Borrelia burgdorferi
    3) B burdorferi
    4) B afzelii
    5) B garinii
    6) B japonica
    7) Ixodes dammini
    8) Ixodes ricinus
    9) Ixodes pacificus

Available Forms Sources

    A) SOURCES
    1) Deer, rabbits, rodents, and domestic animals may harbor ticks.
    2) PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Many patients reside or work in heavily wooded areas or are exposed to areas of tick infestations, particularly in areas where deer are abundant (Steere et al, 1978; Lastavica et al, 1989; Schwartz & Goldstein, 1990; Lane et al, 1992; Schwartz et al, 1994), although less than 50% of patients recall a tick bite (Mertz et al, 1985; Williams & Rolles, 1986).
    3) Almost 70% of I scapularis tick bites are acquired by victims in their own backyards (Falco & Fish, 1988). Recreational parks and nature preserves in endemic areas also represent a substantial human risk for tick bites and LD (Falco & Fish, 1989; Lastavica et al, 1989). Urban park corridors may allow introduction of spirochete-infected ticks into suburban and urban areas; presence of endemic rodents appears to increase the risk (Sigal, 1994; Matuschka et al, 1996).
    4) The presence of domestic animals and pets, while a potential source for ticks, has not been found to be a significant risk factor for transmission to humans(Lane et al, 1992). However, other data suggest that pet ownership and presence of a bird feeder on one's property are risk factors (Sigal, 1994; Schwartz et al, 1994).
    5) Risk of acquiring LD from a blood or platelet transfusion is very low (Sigal, 1994; Gerber et al, 1994).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) DISEASE: Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystem tickborne spirochetal infection (caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi) involving the skin, nervous system, heart, and joints. It is transmitted to humans by bite of an infected tick (Ixodes genus).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Spirochetes are introduced into the skin by the bite of the Ixodes tick. After an incubation period of 3 to 32 days, the organisms disseminate both intradermally and systemically. Cardiac, neurologic, and arthritic complications may occur. B burgdorferi induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses, as well as autoimmunity, nonspecific immune changes, and immunoregulatory abnormalities.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Infection occurs through the bite of infected ticks; only to 30% to 50% of patients recall having been bitten by a tick. There is no evidence that LD is transmitted from person-to-person, including through intimate contact. Mammals and birds can be reservoirs of ticks; including deer, mice, wood rats, rabbits, opossums, chipmunks, raccoons, and squirrels. LD is the most common tickborne illness in North America. In 2010, 94% of confirmed LD cases were reported from 12 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. LD foci are also distributed in the forested areas of Asia and northwestern, central and eastern Europe. The risk of infection is generally low except visitors to rural areas, particularly campers and hikers, in countries or areas at risk.
    D) INCIDENCE: Peak incidence of early LD is in the summer months; tertiary disease occurs year round. In endemic areas, risk of exposure is year-round.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: LD is a multistage disease, which has been arbitrarily divided into 3 groups, defined by different clinical features and duration. Patients may experience all 3 stages or present later in the course of illness.
    a) EARLY LOCALIZED: Stage 1 begins with a distinct skin lesion, erythema migrans at the site of the bite, which may be accompanied by flu-like or meningitis-like symptoms including fatigue, fever, headache, stiff neck, arthralgia and myalgias. Onset is 3 to 32 days post exposure. CNS involvement or infection at this stage is very unlikely.
    b) EARLY DISSEMINATED: Stage 2 includes neurologic or cardiac abnormalities that develop weeks to months after the onset of illness. Neurologic effects include lymphocytic meningitis, cranial neuritis (especially facial palsy) radiculoneuropathy, and rarely encephalomyelitis. Cardiac effects include atrioventricular conduction defects and myocarditis. Tachycardia or bradycardia develop in more than 50% of patients with cardiac involvement. Carditis is fairly common in untreated patients (4% to 10%); principle manifestations are conduction and rhythm disturbances (most often AV block); congestive cardiomyopathy, chest pain, myocarditis, and other dysrhythmias develop less often. Conjunctivitis and sore throat are common early in the course. Mild hepatomegaly and elevations in hepatic enzymes are common. Cough is common early in the course, dyspnea may also develop. ARDS is a rare complication.
    c) LATE STAGE: Stage 3 occurs months or years after the acute illness, with the development of arthritis in one or more large joints. Chronic neurological syndromes including encephalopathy, axonal polyneuropathy, and leukoencephalopathy can also occur.
    2) POST TREATMENT LYME DISEASE SYNDROME or lingering symptoms after treatment can potentially occur. It may develop in approximately 10% to 20% of patients with LD with symptoms lasting months to years. Symptoms can include muscle and joint pains, cognitive defects, sleep disturbances, or fatigue. The cause of these symptoms is not known, but there is no helpful evidence that these symptoms are due to ongoing infection. Continuing antibiotic therapy is not helpful in these patients.
    3) EFFECTS ON PREGNANCY: LD in pregnant women may lead to infection of the placenta and possible stillbirth; however, no negative effects on the fetus have been found when the mother receives appropriate antibiotic treatment. There are no reports of LD transmission from breast milk.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) Fever is common early in the course. Tachycardia or bradycardia occur in more than 50% of patients with cardiac involvement.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Study results of pregnancy outcomes in women with LD are variable.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Diagnosis of LD is usually clinical; patients with an erythema migrans rash can be diagnosed clinically. Laboratory studies should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Patients may be seronegative and have LD during the early stage of disease or patients may be seropositive and not have active disease (ie, past infection).
    B) GENERAL laboratory studies: CBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and liver enzymes are generally unnecessary, depending on patient's presentation. However, it is common that ESR may be elevated and hepatic transaminases may be mildly elevated.
    C) Laboratory support of diagnosis is essential in suspected extracutaneous LD. Confirmation of late disease requires objective evidence of a clinical manifestation of disseminated disease plus laboratory evidence of infection.
    D) CULTURE: Requires special techniques; low yield from blood/CSF; organism (B burgdorferi) may be cultured from skin biopsy or aspirate of erythema migrans lesion.
    E) SEROLOGY: Serologic testing is insensitive during the first few weeks of infection. The presence of an erythema migrans rash can be diagnostic. A single positive serologic test cannot distinguish between active and past infection, due to antibody persistence. It also cannot be used to measure treatment response.
    F) ANTIBODIES: Demonstration of diagnostic IgM or IgG antibodies to B burgdorferi in serum or CSF. CDC currently recommends a two-test approach using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) (rarely used) followed by Western blot is recommended. If the first step is negative, no further testing of the specimen is recommended. If the first step is positive or equivocal the second step should be an immunoblot test (usually a "Western blot"). The results are only considered positive if the EIA/IFA and the immunoblot are both positive. It is recommended that the 2-steps are done together.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.7) BITES/STINGS
    A) INFECTION OF TICK BITE
    1) There are many infectious diseases that can be transmitted via tick bites. For further information on other tickborne illnesses, please SEE the following managements: Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, Ehrlichiosis, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Tularemia. This management is limited to the clinical effects and management of Lyme Disease.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Acute care of patients with Lyme Disease (LD) depends upon the presenting complaint(s). Early treatment with antibiotics is effective in resolving symptoms and preventing extracutaneous complications (See Antibiotic Therapy). Unrecognized and untreated LD can cause late neurologic and arthritis syndromes that are more difficult to treat and may not respond to antibiotics. Patients with cardiac complications (ie, myopericarditis, heart block) may require intensive monitoring or temporary pacemaker insertion. For mild to moderate toxicity, simple tick removal and supportive care for localized dermal symptoms is all that is required.
    2) TICK REMOVAL/DERMAL EXPOSURE: Remove ticks with blunt, wide blade forceps or tweezers rather than directly handling them. Grasp the tick firmly and as close to the skin as possible. Pull the tick out with a steady pull and try to avoid jerking, as that may lead to the head remaining in the skin. Be sure to remove the head of the tick, including its mouth parts, and examine the area with hand lens afterwards. Do NOT crush, puncture, burn or damage the tick as its parts or fluids may contain infective agents. In addition, do NOT apply large amounts of petroleum jelly to the tick to smother it as that may result in greater difficulty in removing it. There is also NO benefit in subcutaneous injections of local anesthesia for tick removal. After removal, clean and disinfect the bite site with soap, water, and alcohol. Place a sterile dressing or adhesive bandage over the wound, and one may apply a topical antibiotic as well. Most pain can be treated with ice applied over the injured area. Local itching or inflammation can be treated with topical corticosteroids, antihistamines and/or anesthetics. Tetanus prophylaxis should be considered.
    3) POST EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS: Although the routine use of antimicrobial prophylaxis or serologic testing is not recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, a single dose of doxycycline may be given to adults (200 mg) or to a child 8 years of age and older (4 mg/kg (maximum: 200 mg)) when ALL of the following conditions exist: (1) the attached tick can be reliably distinguished as an adult or nymphal I. scapularis tick; attached for 36 hours or longer, based on the degree of engorgement of the tick with blood or of certainty about the time of exposure to the tick; (2) prophylaxis can be initiated within 72 hours from the time that the tick was removed; (3) ecologic data suggests that the local rate of infection of these ticks with B. burgdorferi is 20% or more; (4) doxycycline use is not contraindicated. Mild to moderate symptoms from tick borne diseases again may require just supportive care for symptoms (eg, antipyretics for fever, analgesics for pain) but may require antibiotics or other treatments.
    C) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment of severe toxicity from tick bites primarily consists of good supportive care of symptoms, which can range widely. For patients who experience severe symptoms such as meningitis, encephalitis, and pericarditis, intensive care medical management may be required as well as antibiotics depending on the disease.
    2) POSTTREATMENT LYME DISEASE SYNDROME (PTSLD): Antimicrobial agents are NOT recommended for patients with PTLSD. Determine potential causes of symptoms; if no causes were found, treat the patient symptomatically.
    D) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: There is no utility for prehospital activated charcoal. The focus of prehospital care should include tick removal, wound care, and supportive care (see DERMAL EXPOSURE).
    2) HOSPITAL: GI decontamination is not indicated. Treatment should include tick removal or thorough inspection of the site to be sure that all parts of the tick have been removed if performed prior to hospital care (use hand lens for examination), wound care, and supportive care (see DERMAL EXPOSURE).
    E) ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY
    1) ERYTHEMA MIGRANS: The recommended agents for the treatment of early localized or early disseminated LD associated with erythema migrans in adults and children in the absence of specific neurologic manifestations or advanced atrioventricular heart block, are oral doxycycline, amoxicillin or cefuroxime axetil (early localized or disseminated LD, in the absence of neurologic involvement or 3rd degree AV block). The following is a limited discussion of antibiotic use.
    2) RECOMMENDED ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY: DOXYCYCLINE: ADULT: 100 mg orally twice daily for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days). CHILDREN OVER 8 YEARS: 4 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days); maximum: 100 mg/dose. CHILDREN LESS THAN 8 YEARS: Not recommended. AMOXICILLIN: ADULT: 500 mg orally 3 times per day for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days). CHILD: 50 mg/kg/day orally in 3 divided doses for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days); maximum: 500 mg/dose. CEFUROXIME: ADULT: 500 mg orally twice daily for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days); CHILD: 30 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses for 14 days (range: 14 to 21 days); maximum: 500 mg/dose.
    3) ALTERNATIVE: INTOLERANT TO DOXYCYCLINE, AMOXICILLIN, and CEFUROXIME. AZITHROMYCIN: ADULT: 500 mg orally once daily for 7 to 10 days; CHILD: 10 mg/kg/day orally for 7 to 10 days (maximum: 500 mg/day). CLARITHROMYCIN: ADULT: 500 mg orally twice daily (if the patient is not pregnant) for 14 to 21 days; CHILD: 7.5 mg/kg orally twice daily for 14 to 21 days (maximum: 500 mg/dose). ERYTHROMYCIN: ADULT: 500 mg orally 4 times per day for 14 to 21 days; CHILD: 12.5 mg/kg orally 4 times per day for 14 to 21 days (maximum: 500 mg/dose).
    F) MENINGITIS
    1) MENINGITIS OR RADICULOPATHY: Intravenous ceftriaxone is recommended for the treatment of early Lyme Disease with acute neurological disease manifested by meningitis or radiculopathy. Alternatives include intravenous penicillin G potassium or cefotaxime. For adults who are unable to take penicillin and cephalosporins, doxycycline orally (or intravenous if unable to take orally) is an alternative.
    2) PREFERRED: CEFTRIAXONE: ADULT: 2 g IV once per day for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days); CHILD: 50 to 75 mg/kg IV once per day in a single dose (maximum: 2 g/day) for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days).
    3) ALTERNATIVE: CEFOTAXIME: ADULT: 2 g IV every 8 hours for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days); CHILD: 150 to 200 mg/kg/day IV divided into 3 or 4 divided doses (maximum: 6 g/day) for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days). PENICILLIN G: ADULT: 18 to 24 million Units/day IV in divided doses every 4 hours for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days); CHILD: 200,000 to 400,000 Units/kg/day IV divided doses every 4 hours (maximum dose: Not to exceed 18 to 24 million Units/day) for 14 days (range from 10 to 28 days).
    G) CARDITIS
    1) LYME CARDITIS: Hospitalization, cardiac monitoring, and possible insertion of a temporary pacemaker often are required for patients with Lyme carditis. Regimens for initial treatment of hospitalized patients: Refer to treatment of Lyme meningitis. Regimen for ambulatory patients: Refer to treatment for erythema migrans.
    H) ARTHRITIS
    1) LYME ARTHRITIS without neurological involvement can be treated with oral antimicrobial agents for 28 days; Lyme arthritis with neurological involvement should receive IV antibiotics for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days). For patients with persistent or recurrent joint swelling after recommended courses of antimicrobial therapy, a repeat 4-week course of oral antibiotics or a 2- to 4-week course of IV ceftriaxone may be used. In patients with antibiotic-refractory arthritis (persistent synovitis for at least 2 months after completion of a course of IV ceftriaxone or after completion of two 4-week course of an oral antibiotic regimen), a third course of antimicrobials is NOT recommended; treatment is symptomatic (eg, NSAIDs, corticosteroids). Doxycycline is relatively contraindicated during pregnancy or lactation and for children less than 8 years.
    2) PREFERRED: ORAL THERAPY: DOXYCYCLINE: ADULT: 100 mg orally twice daily for 28 days; CHILDREN 8 YEARS OR OLDER: 4 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses (maximum: 200 mg/day) for 28 days. AMOXICILLIN: ADULT: 500 mg orally 3 times daily for 28 days; CHILD: 50 mg/kg/day orally in 3 divided doses (maximum: 1500 mg/day) for 28 days. CEFUROXIME AXETIL: ADULT: 500 mg orally twice daily for 28 days; CHILD: 30 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses (maximum: 1000 mg/day) for 28 days.
    3) PREFERRED: INTRAVENOUS THERAPY: CEFTRIAXONE: ADULT: 2 g IV daily for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days); CHILD: 50 to 75 mg/kg/day IV daily (maximum: 2 g/day) for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days). ALTERNATIVE: CEFOTAXIME: ADULT: 2 g IV 3 times daily for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days); CHILD: 150 to 200 mg/kg/day divided into 3 or 4 IV doses (maximum: 6 g/day) for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days). PENICILLIN G: ADULT: 18 to 24 million units/day IV divided into doses given every 4 hours for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days); CHILD: 200,000 to 400,000 units/kg/day IV divided into doses given every 4 hours (maximum: 18 to 24 million units/day) for 14 days (range: 14 to 28 days).
    I) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Enhanced elimination is unlikely to be necessary.
    J) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Adequate compliance with oral antibiotic therapy should be assured, with follow-up arranged as appropriate. Education as to potential side effects of medicine and complications of the disease is necessary.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with worsening symptoms that do not improve with oral antibiotic therapy should go to a healthcare facility for further evaluation and treatment.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Admission is needed for patients requiring IV rehydration or IV antibiotic therapy. Frequent reassessment, especially when the etiologic diagnosis is in doubt, is imperative. Patients with carditis, PR interval prolongation greater than 0.30 seconds or with high-degree AV block are at high risk of developing sudden complete heart block. Intensive monitoring and consideration of pacemaker insertion is required. Criteria for discharge include patients that are clinically improving and physically stable.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consultation with a rheumatologist or internist should be obtained for long-term follow-up of all patients with LD. Cardiology consultation should be considered in those patients manifesting myopericardial involvement. Orthopedic consultation may be appropriate in cases of chronic refractory arthritis necessitating synovectomy. Cases of LD during pregnancy should be reported to State health departments and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Poison centers can aid treatment by serving as a public health resource for the general public seeking advice.
    K) PITFALLS
    1) Failure to recognize erythema migrans and to start antibiotic therapy. Fail to detect heart block. Failure to find and remove the tick.
    L) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) EARLY LD (erythema migrans, febrile illness): Localized tick/insect/spider bite reaction, bacterial cellulitis, erythema multiforme, fixed drug reaction, plant dermatitis (eg, poison ivy/oak), other tickborne illnesses.
    2) LYME CARDITIS: Acute rheumatic fever, other infectious, medications (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin), coronary artery disease, structural cardiac abnormalities.
    3) LYME ARTHRITIS: Traumatic effusion, gout, septic arthritis, Reiter syndrome/reactive arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
    4) NEUROBORRELIOSIS: Viral meningitis, idiopathic Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, HIV infection, diabetic neuropathy.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXIC DOSE: One tick is enough to cause an infection. Risk of infection is increased with tick attachment longer than 48 to 72 hours. With tick attachment of less than 48 hours, risk infection is unlikely, although the risk of local reaction to the bite or other tickborne diseases still exists.

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LARGE LIVER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Finding in about 5% of cases. It may be associated with mild liver enzyme abnormalities suggesting hepatic inflammation (Steere et al, 1983a).
    B) TOXIC HEPATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatitis (often subclinical) associated with Lyme disease has been reported, and may be the result of direct tissue invasion by the spirochete (Chavanet, 1987)( Goellner, 1988) (Agger et al, 1991; Kazakoff et al, 1993). About 10% of patients have symptoms suggestive of hepatitis, including anorexia, nausea, and vomiting (Steere et al, 1983a).
    b) Elevated liver enzymes indicating subclinical hepatitis may provide a clue to the diagnosis when erythema migrans lesion is absent and patients remain ill. In one series, liver enzyme abnormalities were detected in about 25% of patients with erythema migrans who had not been treated with antibiotics; elevated GGT was the most common finding (25%), followed by elevations of ALT, alkaline phosphatase, and AST; bilirubin levels usually were normal (Kazakoff et al, 1993).
    c) Another series found one abnormal liver enzymes in 40% of patients with erythema migrans and more than one in 27%. Elevations of GGT (28%) and ALT (27%) were most common, with bilirubin elevated in only 3%. Most elevations were mild, not associated with symptoms, and improved or resolved within 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (Horowitz et al, 1996).
    1) ASAT: Elevated in 15% to 20% of patients. In one series, values ranged from 36 to 251 U/mL (median, 71 U/mL) (normal = <35 U/mL). Enzyme levels generally return to normal within several weeks (Steere et al, 1983a; Horowitz et al, 1996).
    2) ALAT: Elevated in most patients with elevated ASAT levels. Fifteen percent of patients in one study had values ranging from 42 to 491 U/mL (median, 125 U/mL) (normal <32 U/mL) (Steere et al, 1983a).
    3) LDH: Elevated in about 15% of patients. In one study, ranged from 600 to 1080 U/mL (n=<600 U/mL) (Steere et al, 1983a).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISORDER OF TESTIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) TESTICULAR EDEMA: Occurs in 2% of males with Lyme disease, but the significance of this finding is uncertain (Steere et al, 1983a).
    B) URINARY SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) May be part of neuroborreliosis or due to direct invasion of the urinary tract by the spirochete. Urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia are the most frequent symptoms; urinary retention may also occur (Chancellor et al, 1993).
    b) Mild proteinuria has occasionally been noted in patients with hematuria. Resolution occurs within one to two weeks (Steere et al, 1983a).
    C) BLOOD IN URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rarely, microscopic hematuria for one to two weeks, sometimes associated with mild proteinuria, may be present (Steere et al, 1983a).

Summary Of Exposure

    A) DISEASE: Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystem tickborne spirochetal infection (caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi) involving the skin, nervous system, heart, and joints. It is transmitted to humans by bite of an infected tick (Ixodes genus).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Spirochetes are introduced into the skin by the bite of the Ixodes tick. After an incubation period of 3 to 32 days, the organisms disseminate both intradermally and systemically. Cardiac, neurologic, and arthritic complications may occur. B burgdorferi induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses, as well as autoimmunity, nonspecific immune changes, and immunoregulatory abnormalities.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Infection occurs through the bite of infected ticks; only to 30% to 50% of patients recall having been bitten by a tick. There is no evidence that LD is transmitted from person-to-person, including through intimate contact. Mammals and birds can be reservoirs of ticks; including deer, mice, wood rats, rabbits, opossums, chipmunks, raccoons, and squirrels. LD is the most common tickborne illness in North America. In 2010, 94% of confirmed LD cases were reported from 12 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. LD foci are also distributed in the forested areas of Asia and northwestern, central and eastern Europe. The risk of infection is generally low except visitors to rural areas, particularly campers and hikers, in countries or areas at risk.
    D) INCIDENCE: Peak incidence of early LD is in the summer months; tertiary disease occurs year round. In endemic areas, risk of exposure is year-round.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: LD is a multistage disease, which has been arbitrarily divided into 3 groups, defined by different clinical features and duration. Patients may experience all 3 stages or present later in the course of illness.
    a) EARLY LOCALIZED: Stage 1 begins with a distinct skin lesion, erythema migrans at the site of the bite, which may be accompanied by flu-like or meningitis-like symptoms including fatigue, fever, headache, stiff neck, arthralgia and myalgias. Onset is 3 to 32 days post exposure. CNS involvement or infection at this stage is very unlikely.
    b) EARLY DISSEMINATED: Stage 2 includes neurologic or cardiac abnormalities that develop weeks to months after the onset of illness. Neurologic effects include lymphocytic meningitis, cranial neuritis (especially facial palsy) radiculoneuropathy, and rarely encephalomyelitis. Cardiac effects include atrioventricular conduction defects and myocarditis. Tachycardia or bradycardia develop in more than 50% of patients with cardiac involvement. Carditis is fairly common in untreated patients (4% to 10%); principle manifestations are conduction and rhythm disturbances (most often AV block); congestive cardiomyopathy, chest pain, myocarditis, and other dysrhythmias develop less often. Conjunctivitis and sore throat are common early in the course. Mild hepatomegaly and elevations in hepatic enzymes are common. Cough is common early in the course, dyspnea may also develop. ARDS is a rare complication.
    c) LATE STAGE: Stage 3 occurs months or years after the acute illness, with the development of arthritis in one or more large joints. Chronic neurological syndromes including encephalopathy, axonal polyneuropathy, and leukoencephalopathy can also occur.
    2) POST TREATMENT LYME DISEASE SYNDROME or lingering symptoms after treatment can potentially occur. It may develop in approximately 10% to 20% of patients with LD with symptoms lasting months to years. Symptoms can include muscle and joint pains, cognitive defects, sleep disturbances, or fatigue. The cause of these symptoms is not known, but there is no helpful evidence that these symptoms are due to ongoing infection. Continuing antibiotic therapy is not helpful in these patients.
    3) EFFECTS ON PREGNANCY: LD in pregnant women may lead to infection of the placenta and possible stillbirth; however, no negative effects on the fetus have been found when the mother receives appropriate antibiotic treatment. There are no reports of LD transmission from breast milk.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) Fever is common early in the course. Tachycardia or bradycardia occur in more than 50% of patients with cardiac involvement.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) Fever, typically low-grade and intermittent, is a common early symptom, noted in 40% to 60% of patients(Weissman et al, 1999; Agger et al, 1991; Asch et al, 1994; Nadelman et al, 1996; Steere et al, 1983a).
    1) Children are more likely than adults to be febrile; the temperature may be higher (up to 40 C) and persistently elevated (Williams et al, 1990).
    2) Fever also may occur at the onset of cardiac or neurologic involvement or during the course of chronic arthritis (Steere, 1979d, 1980b; (Reik et al, 1979).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) PHOTOPHOBIA: Accompanied by pain on eye motion and a feeling of pressure behind both eyes is an early manifestation (Steere et al, 1983a). Meningoencephalitis may or may not be present (Steere et al, 1983a).
    B) EYE PAIN: Pain on eye motion and a feeling of pressure behind both eyes are occasional early symptoms (Steere et al, 1983a).
    C) PERIORBITAL EDEMA: Occurs in about 3% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a).
    D) INFLAMMATION, CONJUNCTIVAL: Nonspecific follicular conjunctivitis develops within days of erythema migrans (EM) onset in about 10% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a; Kaufman et al, 1989). May be more common in children; in one series was present in 25% of children with stage II LD (Gerber et al, 1996a). It maybe accompanied by periorbital edema, episcleritis, photophobia, and/or subconjunctival hemorrhage (Lesser, 1995).
    E) BLEPHAROSPASM: May occur in patients with encephalitis (Reik et al, 1979).
    F) VISUAL ACUITY, DECREASED: Transient obscured vision may occur in patients with meningoencephalitis (Reik et al, 1979). Blindness occurred in one patient who initially had active infection of the eye. A delay in correct diagnosis and treatment may have contributed to this occurrence (Steere et al, 1985a).
    1) Animal studies indicate that the spirochete invades the eye early and may remain dormant. Keratitis with nonstaining opacities, vitreitis, uveitis, neuroretinitis, choroiditis, retinal vasculitis, optic neuritis, and pars planitis have all been reported as late manifestations of LD (Lesser, 1995; Karma et al, 1995; Hilton et al, 1996a).
    2) Ocular involvement (keratitis, anterior/intermediate uveitis) may occur in children and adolescents with Lyme arthritis and is associated with symptoms of decreased visual acuity (Huppertz et al, 1999).
    G) PAPILLEDEMA: May be a sign of meningitis; usually bilateral. Intracranial pressure is often normal (Reik et al, 1979; Lesser, 1995; Kauffmann & Wormser, 1990). In a pediatric series, several children with CNS involvement presented with pseudotumor cerebri; all had papilledema and elevated opening pressures on lumbar puncture (Bachman & Srivastava, 1998). Also may be present in patients without meningitis (Kauffmann & Wormser, 1990) (Raucher, 1985).
    H) KERATITIS: Characterized only by bilateral nonstaining opacities appears to be more common than interstitial or ulcerative keratitis, though these have been reported. Most cases occur within a few months of disease onset (Kommehl, 1989) (Kauffman & Wormser, 1990; Flach & Lavoie, 1990; Lesser, 1995). Keratitis has been reported as a long-term sequelae to untreated Lyme disease in children and adolescents (Szer et al, 1991).
    1) Ocular involvement, including keratitis, may occur in children and adolescents with Lyme arthritis. Visual loss appears to be symptomatic, making regular ocular screening of such patients unnecessary (Huppertz et al, 1999).
    I) UVEITIS: Uncommon complication. Usually bilateral. Has multitude of presentations; intensity of inflammation may range from mild acute iritis to severe granulomatous reaction with granulomatous keratic precipitates and posterior synechiae (Mikkila, 1997) (Copeland, 1990; Kauffmann & Wormser, 1990; Steere et al, 1985a) (Winword, 1989).
    1) Ocular involvement, including anterior and intermediate uveitis, may occur in children and adolescents with Lyme arthritis (Huppertz et al, 1999).
    2) Assays for anti-Borrelia antibodies during the initial screening of patients with uveitis are of limited value (Breeveld, 1993).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) EAR PAIN: Nonspecific ear pain without signs of infection was described in 4% of patients in one large series (Steere et al, 1983a).
    B) Bilateral hearing loss may occur rarely, noted in 1.5% of patients in one series; following treatment, hearing returned to normal within 10 days to 7 months in all patients (Moscatello et al, 1991). In one study, 17% of (n=98) patients with hearing loss of unknown origin showed positive antibody production against the Borrelia antigen. Most of the patients also had a history of vertigo, and three had peripheral facial palsy. The hearing loss improved with antibiotic therapy in five cases (Hanner et al, 1989).
    1) In endemic areas, antibodies against LD should be determined in patients with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (Peltomaa et al, 2000).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) THROAT PAIN: INCIDENCE: 10% to 25% of patients have reported symptoms, but no exudate is noted on examination of the pharynx (Steere et al, 1983a; Moscatello et al, 1991).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachycardia (HR greater than 100 beats/min) or bradycardia is the most common clue to cardiac involvement, occurring in over 50% of involved patients. Otherwise, increased heart rate is appropriate for the degree of temperature elevation (Steere et al, 1980b).
    b) Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia has been reported (Vlay et al, 1991; McAllister et al, 1989).
    B) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Over 50% of patients with cardiac involvement exhibit either bradycardia (HR less than 55 beats/min) or tachycardia (Steere et al, 1980b).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe hypotension manifesting as dizziness or syncope may occur in patients with high degree heart block (Steere et al, 1980b).
    D) CARDIOMYOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) LD also may cause chronic congestive cardiomyopathy, with resultant dyspnea and exercise intolerance (Faul et al, 1999).
    E) LYME CARDITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cardiac abnormalities (ie carditis) occur in approximately 4% to 10% of untreated patients, with manifestations developing 4 to 83 (median 21) days after onset of EM (Stage II). Over 75% of these patients still have skin lesions and 50% are febrile. Concurrent CNS or joint involvement is common (Steere et al, 1980b; Asch et al, 1994; Sigal, 1995).
    b) Symptoms suggestive of cardiac involvement include: dizziness, syncope, shortness of breath, pleuritic chest pain increased by lying down, and palpitations (Forrester & Mead, 2014). Tachycardia or bradycardia is the most common sign of cardiac involvement (Steere et al, 1980b).
    c) Myopericardial involvement may result in conduction disturbances, ventricular dysfunction, dysrhythmias, or cardiomegaly. Most abnormalities resolve within three to six weeks (Steere et al, 1980b).
    d) Carditis develops in 4% to 10% of untreated persons with erythema migrans; occurs much less frequently in patients who have received treatment for early LD (Evans, 1998). There appears to be a male predominance in Lyme carditis, despite generally equal gender distribution of LD (Sigal, 1995). May include atrioventricular block, myopericarditis, and left ventricular dysfunction; conduction and rhythm disturbances are noted most frequently (Nadelman & Wormser, 1998; Bachman & Srivastava, 1998; Evans, 1998; Spach et al, 1993; Steere et al, 1980b; Reznick et al, 1986; Woolf et al, 1991; McAllister et al, 1989; van der Linde MR, 1991; Agger et al, 1991; Levine et al, 1991).
    1) POPULATION AT RISK: Young male patients appear to be at greater risk to develop features of Lyme carditis. Of all cases of lyme disease, males account for just over 50% of cases; however, the male to female ratio is 3:1 among patients developing lyme carditis. Males also develop more cases of third-degree heart block and it occurs at a predominantly younger age (10 to 45 years) (Forrester & Mead, 2014).
    2) Typically occurs 3 to 5 weeks after onset of LD, during acute disseminated phase of the illness. May present quite dramatically, particularly in patients who lack definitive symptoms of LD and who, therefore, do not receive early treatment. Nonspecific flu-like illness may have preceded onset of cardiac disease and gone unrecognized (Evans, 1998).
    3) Recovery from Lyme carditis generally is complete without residual or conduction abnormalities, even without antibiotic therapy (Evans, 1998).
    F) HEART BLOCK
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Most common cardiac complication; 90% of patients with cardiac involvement have AV block, and about 50% of these patients display high-degree blocks. May be presenting and main clinical problem (Rosenfeld et al, 1999; Spach et al, 1993; van der Linde MR, 1991; Kimball et al, 1989; Clesham et al, 1994; Steere et al, 1980b).
    b) The heart block can fluctuate rapidly. Shifting from first degree to complete block and vice versa can occur in minutes, so that patients with complete heart block also often have first and second degree (Wenckebach) blocks; the block is most often proximal to the bundle of His, although both bundle branch and fascicular block have been described (Weissman et al, 1999; Steere et al, 1980b; McAllister et al, 1989; van der Linde MR, 1991; Sigal, 1995; Huff et al, 1995).
    c) Patients with high-degree AV block often complain of syncope, dizziness, shortness of breath, palpitations, and substernal chest pain. Most also have either tachycardia or bradycardia at some point, and a loud S3 gallop rhythm may be noted(Rosenfeld et al, 1999; Evans, 1998; Steere et al, 1980b; Olson et al, 1986; Kishaba et al, 1988; Vlay, 1986; van der Linde MR, 1991; Kimball et al, 1989; de Koning et al, 1989).
    d) POPULATION AT RISK: Young male patients appear to be at greater risk to develop features of Lyme carditis. Of all cases of lyme disease, males account for just over 50% of cases; however, the male to female ratio is 3:1 among patients developing lyme carditis. Males also develop more cases of third-degree heart block and it occurs at a predominantly younger age (10 to 45 years). The exact cause for more episodes of heart block and third-degree heart block is unknown (Forrester & Mead, 2014).
    e) CASE REPORT: One case reported frightening dreams and seizure-like symptoms or "spells" while the patient was in complete heart block with periods of ventricular asystole. The combination of heart block and meningitis (lymphocytic cerebrospinal fluid) pleocytosis led to the diagnosis of Lyme disease (Weissman et al, 1999).
    f) Cardiac evaluation for evidence of myocarditis should be included in the evaluation of children with Lyme disease, even in the absence of clinically apparent heart disease. Children with cardiac involvement frequently are asymptomatic but may have abnormal ECGs; in one series, almost 30% of children with definite or probable LD had abnormal ECG findings, most commonly first degree heart block (Woolf et al, 1991).
    g) Hospitalization and continuous monitoring is required for patients with high-degree heart block or a PR interval greater than 0.3 seconds (Evans, 1998; McAllister et al, 1989). Temporary pacemaker insertion may be necessary (Huff et al, 1995). Prognosis usually is excellent, with resolution of complete block seen within 10 to 14 days (McAllister et al, 1989; van der Linde MR, 1991; Clesham et al, 1994). Rarely, heart damage may result in permanent pacemaker insertion (Artigao et al, 1991; de Koning et al, 1989; McAllister et al, 1989).
    G) CHEST PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chest pain, described as stabbing, occurs early in the course in about 4% of patients. It is quite brief, lasting only seconds at a time, and is increased with lying down (Steere et al, 1983a).
    H) SYNCOPE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Syncope suggests cardiac involvement and may be related to transient bradycardia or heart block that compromises cardiac output (Steere et al, 1980b).
    I) PALPITATIONS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Palpitations suggest cardiac involvement. A heart rate greater than 100 beats/minute may be noted in over 50% of affected patients (Steere et al, 1980b).
    J) MYOCARDITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Invasion of the myocardium by B burgdorferi has been demonstrated (van der Linde MR, 1991; de Koning et al, 1989). Manifestations include T wave flattening or inversion, intraventricular conduction defects, PVCs, transient and reversible depression of left ventricular function, cardiomegaly, flow murmurs, mitral regurgitation murmurs, and pericardial effusions. Severe cardiac dysfunction or fulminant heart failure is rare (Evans, 1998).
    K) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Premature ventricular contractions: Three of 20 patients with cardiac involvement had intraventricular conduction delays and accompanying PVCs; the PVCs resolved without treatment as the conduction delay normalized (Steere et al, 1980b). Intraventricular conduction delays are usually asymptomatic, but may be associated with PVCs (Steere et al, 1980b).
    b) Atrial fibrillation with a ventricular response of 120 beats/minute occurred in an otherwise healthy patient. First-degree heart block developed after resolution of the atrial fibrillation. During remission, EKG and exercise thallium-201 perfusion scan were normal (Steere et al, 1980b).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COUGH
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nonproductive cough is a symptom in 5% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a).
    B) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Patients with early disseminated LD may complain of shortness of breath due to cardiac involvement or phrenic nerve palsy (Faul et al, 1999). Symptoms of dyspnea and palpitations are seen in patients with high-degree heart block (Olson et al, 1986) and heart failure. LD also may cause chronic congestive cardiomyopathy, with resultant dyspnea and exercise intolerance (Faul et al, 1999).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Fatal ARDS in a patient with Lyme disease has been reported. The patient presented initially with a dry cough, fever, generalized maculopapular rash, and myositis; she also had markedly abnormal liver enzymes results. Her condition remained refractory to treatment, and she ultimately developed ARDS (Kirsch et al, 1988).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) Neurologic symptoms may be the presenting manifestations of Lyme disease or may occur later in course. The triad of neurologic involvement in Lyme disease - meningitis, cranial neuritis, and radiculoneuritis - presents a unique clinical picture.
    2) 20% to 30% of patients with LD develop neurologic manifestations (Bowen & Griffin, 1984). Early CNS involvement appears to be limited to patients who show clinical manifestations of disseminated LD; the finding of minor CSF abnormalities in patients with only a single erythema migrans lesion is not associated with the subsequent development of systemic LD (Kuiper, 1994).
    3) Prognosis is generally good, although residual facial or extremity weakness and memory or behavioral changes may occur (Reik et al, 1979); Shadick, 1994).
    4) Neuroborreliosis occurs in approximately 10% of untreated patients with early disseminated disease (Sigal, 1992; Levine et al, 1991; Coyle, 1993). Early CNS involvement appears to be limited to patients who show clinical manifestations of disseminated LD; the finding of minor CSF abnormalities in patients with only a single erythema migrans lesion is not associated with the subsequent development of systemic LD (Kuiper, 1994).
    a) The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology has proposed the following guidelines. The diagnosis of definite nervous system LD requires (QSSAAN, 1996; (Halperin et al, 1996):
    b) Possible exposure to appropriate ticks in an endemic area.
    c) One or more of the following:
    1) Erythema migrans or histologically proven Borrelia lymphocytoma or acrodermatitis.
    2) Immunologic evidence of exposure to B burgdorferi.
    3) Culture, histologic, or polymerase chain reaction proof of the presence of B burgdorferi.
    d) Occurrence of one or more of the neurologic disorders described below, after exclusion of other potential etiologies:
    1) Lymphocytic meningitis with or without cranial neuritis, painful radiculopathy, or both.
    2) Encephalomyelitis.
    3) Peripheral neuropathy.
    4) Encephalopathy.
    e) CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS (Nadelman & Wormser, 1998; Steere, 1989; Sigal, 1992; Coyle, 1993):
    1) EARLY DISSEMINATED LD: Meningitis, Cranial neuritis, Bell's palsy, Motor or sensory radiculoneuritis, Encephalitis (subtle), Mononeuritis multiplex, Myelitis (rare), Chorea (rare), Cerebellar ataxia (rare), Subarachnoid hemorrhage (Chehrenama et al, 1997), Pseudotumor cerebri (Bachman & Srivastava, 1998) (Raucher, 1985).
    2) LATE LD: Chronic encephalomyelitis, Spastic paraparesis, Ataxic gait, Subtle mental disorders, Chronic axonal polyradiculopathy, Dementia (rare).
    B) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) May occur as part of the early symptom complex of LD (about 2/3 of cases) or may indicate meningitis (Steere et al, 1983a; Moscatello et al, 1991). Present in about 40% of both adults and children with early localized LD (Nadelman et al, 1996; Gerber et al, 1996a).
    b) When headache occurs as an indication of meningitis, it is usually accompanied by focal neurologic and/or cognitive abnormalities; headache as the sole manifestation of Lyme meningitis has been reported, but appears to be rare (Scelsa, 1995).
    c) The headache associated with meningitis typically fluctuates in intensity. It can be excruciating or, at times, mild or absent. The location is usually frontal or occipital but may be bitemporal, global, or very low, almost in the neck (Pachner & Steere, 1985) 1995).
    d) In one study, 22 (32%) of the 69 patients with Lyme disease developed headache (Petersen et al, 2015).
    C) FACIAL PALSY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Most common cranial neurologic manifestation of Lyme disease, occurring in about 10% of both children and adults and in 1/3 to 1/2 of patients with neurologic findings (Dressler, 1994; Reik et al, 1979; Pachner & Steere, 1985) Clark, 1985; (Asch et al, 1994)Bingham, 1995;(Gerber et al, 1996a; Smouha et al, 1997).
    b) Most common infectious cause of facial palsy (Robert, 1991; Christen, 1990; (Bjerkhoel et al, 1989). One Swedish study found LD accounted for 6% of all facial palsies; among patients with facial palsy, LD was a more common cause in children than in adults (Engervall, 1995).
    c) Occurs early, often while erythema migrans is still present. The mean time from onset of erythema migrans to facial palsy is 20 days (Clark, 1985).
    d) Bilateral in about 25% of cases. May be the only presenting sign and may occur without an antecedent rash; arthritis may accompany or follow the facial palsy (Clark, 1985; Bingham, 1995). The weakness may be preceded or accompanied by a sensation of numbness and tingling on the affected side of the face, but a clear sensory abnormality is not present. Patients often report pain around the ear or jaw (Pachner & Steere, 1985) Olsson, 1988; (Lesser, 1995). May be preceded by nontender facial edema and erythema of varying severity (Markley, 1989).
    e) In endemic areas, facial nerve palsy may be a marker of occult meningitis (Belman, 1997). Accompanied by aseptic meningitis in one third to one half of Lyme disease cases in children (Williams et al, 1990)(Bingham, 1995).
    f) Lyme disease should be considered in patients presenting with idiopathic facial paralysis that is bilateral, occurs in the summer months in an endemic area, and/or is associated with facial erythema and induration (Bachman & Srivastava, 1998) Clark, 1985; (Caruso, 1985) Olsson, 1988; (Markby, 1989; Lesser, 1995; Smouha et al, 1997). However, prior erythema migrans or concurrent clinical signs are often absent (Smouha et al, 1997).
    g) The combination of acute facial palsy, particularly bilaterally, and CSF pleocytosis suggests the second stage of Lyme disease (Lewis, 1986; Clark, 1985; Christen, 1990; (Smouha et al, 1997). The facial paralysis itself has an excellent prognosis. May last for weeks, but there usually is no or only minimal residual weakness (Pachner & Steere, 1985) Clark, 1985; (Lesser, 1995; Moscatello et al, 1991); Bingham, 1995).
    h) In one study, 36 (52%) of the 69 patients with Lyme disease developed facial palsy. Monosymptomatic facial palsy was observed in one patient. Older age group had a significantly lower risk of facial palsy without radicular symptoms (Petersen et al, 2015).
    D) NEURITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Shoulder girdle neuritis is the most common motor radiculopathy in Lyme disease. Onset may be 3 weeks to 6 months after the acute illness; it begins with shoulder pain, followed one to two days later by motor weakness. The deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, biceps, and triceps may all be involved. There is corresponding diminution of deep tendon reflexes (Reik et al, 1979).
    b) In one series, bilateral shoulder weakness was reported in two patients, and one also had hypesthesia of the axillary nerve (Reik et al, 1979).
    c) Radiculoneuritis, usually characterized by a "belt-like" tightness with sharp or burning pain radiating along one or two adjacent dermatomal segments from T5 to T11, is a relatively common manifestation of neuroborreliosis and may persist for 6 to 8 weeks with gradual decrease in pain. Radicular pain rarely begins within the dermatomal distribution of the tick bite (Reik et al, 1979; Halperin et al, 1996).
    d) Painful radiculoneuritis may accompany meningitis in stage II LD (Halperin et al, 1996)). Chronic radiculoneuropathy occurs in up to 30% of patients with other systemic findings of stage II LD and may not be associated with CNS infection (p 505; Halperin et al, 1996).
    1) A demyelination-like syndrome has been reported on presentation in patients with Lyme disease. Extremities and face have both been involved (p 505).
    2) In one study, 56 (81%) of the 69 patients with Lyme disease developed radiculoneuritis (Petersen et al, 2015).
    e) NEURITIS, CRANIAL: 40% to 50% of patients with neurologic abnormalities develop cranial neuritis, primarily unilateral or bilateral facial (7th nerve) palsy (Reik et al, 1979; Pachner & Steere, 1985) Clark, 1985; Olsson, 1988; (Lesser, 1995; Asch et al, 1994). Involvement of other cranial nerves is unusual; 6th, 9th, and 10th nerve palsies have been observed (Pachner & Steere, 1985; Lesser, 1995).
    f) NEURITIS, PERIPHERAL: Approximately one third of patients with neurologic manifestations developed peripheral nervous system involvement, including thoracic sensory radiculitis, motor radiculitis in extremities, brachial plexitis, mononeuritis, and mononeuritis multiplex (Pachner & Steere, 1985; Reik et al, 1986; Finkel, 1988). Patients with extremity involvement generally have severe radicular pain, dysesthesias, subtle sensory loss, focal weakness, and loss of reflexes. Thoracic radiculitis may be experienced as intense pain or pressure within the distribution of a few dermatomes (Pachner & Steere, 1985) (Sindic, 1987) (Reik, 1987) (Finkel, 1988).
    g) NEURITIS, OPTIC: Uncommon complication; appears to result from direct tissue invasion by spirochete with immune-mediated inflammation (Schechter, 1986; Farris & Webb, 1988; Gustafson et al, 1988; Bertuch et al, 1988; Lesser, 1995) .
    E) HEMIPARESIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Focal meningoencephalitis in which the initial symptom was acute hemiparesis has been reported (Wilke, 2000) (Feder et al, 1988).
    F) ATAXIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Ataxia or broad-based gait has been reported in several cases of Lyme neuroborreliosis and is usually accompanied by other neurologic findings. Symptoms may be typical of cerebellitis or mimic those of a localized mass lesion (Mario-Ubaldo, 1995) (Curless, 1996).
    G) FATIGUE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: Up to 80% of patients complain of fatigue(Steere et al, 1983a; Gerber et al, 1996a). It is often a constant symptom, contrary to other early manifestations that are intermittent and changing over a period of weeks. Persistent general fatigue is common and is predictive of late complications or relapse (Steere et al, 1980b; Asch et al, 1994)(Shadick, 1994). A feeling of constant lethargy is reported by up to 80% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a).
    H) MALAISE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Up to 80% of patients will complain of malaise (Steere et al, 1983a; Moscatello et al, 1991).
    I) MENINGITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Aseptic meningitis occurs in less than 10% of cases (Bowen & Griffin, 1984; Agger et al, 1991). It may occur while erythema migrans is still present or, more typically, several weeks later (Reik et al, 1979; Pachner & Steere, 1985; Huppertz & Sticht-Groh, 1989).
    b) Headache, neck stiffness, nausea, vomiting, and photophobia are common and recur over months. Neck stiffness is usually noted only on extreme neck flexion; Kernig and Brudzinski signs are absent (Nadelman & Wormser, 1998; Pachner & Steere, 1985; Coyle, 1993).
    c) When headache occurs as an indication of meningitis, it is usually accompanied by focal neurologic and/or cognitive abnormalities; headache as the sole manifestation of Lyme meningitis has been reported but appears to be rare (Scelsa, 1995). The headache associated with meningitis typically fluctuates in intensity. It can be excruciating or, at times, mild or absent. The location is usually frontal or occipital but may be bitemporal, global, or very low, almost in the neck (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    d) In children, it should be suspected in the presence of facial palsy and any neck complaints; facial palsy is accompanied by aseptic meningitis in 1/3 to 1/2 of cases (Belman, 1997)(Williams et al, 1990)(Bingham, 1995).
    e) Seropositive patients with aseptic meningitis and without initial signs of an infectious etiology should be suspected of having neuroborreliosis even when first LP is negative (Millner, 1989).
    f) CASE REPORT: One case reported frightening dreams and seizure-like symptoms or "spells" while the patient was in complete heart block with periods of ventricular asystole. The combination of heart block and meningitis (lymphocytic cerebrospinal fluid) pleocytosis led to the diagnosis of Lyme disease (Weissman et al, 1999).
    J) ENCEPHALITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chronic Lyme disease commonly is associated with subtle difficulty with concentration and memory; may represent either a vasculitis or encephalitis. Encephalitis probably occurs in about 0.1% of LD patients (Halperin, 1989 (Halperin et al, 1996).
    b) Patients may experience subtle neuropsychiatric symptoms months to years after initial infection, including somnolence, emotional lability, depression, memory loss or difficulty concentrating, and behavior changes (Pachner & Steere, 1985) 1995). Other reported manifestations include choreiform movements (Reik et al, 1979) and diffuse encephalopathy with seizures (Reik, 1985).
    c) Focal encephalitis in a young woman six years after the onset of untreated Lyme disease and abrupt onset of focal symptoms suggesting brain stem tumor in a teenager 7 years after diagnosis of Lyme arthritis have been described (Broderick et al, 1987) Curless, 1996).
    d) Marked chronic CNS involvement without any alteration of peripheral nerves has also been reported (Kohler, 1988). Symptoms usually fluctuate over months, but most patients are able to resume normal activities, including return to work or school (Halperin, 1990 (Halperin et al, 1996).
    e) Children may develop neurocognitive symptoms concurrently for months after classic manifestations of LD, possibly representing an infectious or postinfectious encephalopathy related to B burgdorferi infection (Bloom, 1998).
    K) IMPAIRED COGNITION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Adults with previous LD have a higher prevalence of neurocognitive impairment compared with those without a history of LD; characterized by verbal memory deficits occasionally associated with headache or decreased concentration. These sequelae appear to correlate with a longer duration of infection (Pollina, 1999) (Shadick, 1994) (Asch et al, 1995; Bujak et al, 1996).
    b) A subgroup of adults treated for LD but with continuing symptoms of arthralgia, fatigue, and memory impairment had decreased attention/concentration scores, decreased verbal memory, and increased depressive symptomatology when compared with a matched group of patients without persistent complaints (Bujak et al, 1996).
    c) Children appropriately diagnosed and treated for LD have an excellent prognosis for unimpaired cognitive functioning (Wang, 1998; Adams, 1999, 1994). However, children may develop neurocognitive symptoms along with or months after classic manifestations of LD, possibly representing an infectious or postinfectious encephalopathy related to B burgdorferi infection (Bloom, 1998).
    d) Post-Lyme syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) share many features, including symptoms of severe fatigue and cognitive difficulty. However, despite this symptom overlap, patients with post-Lyme syndrome show greater cognitive deficits than those with CFS (Gaudino et al, 1997).
    L) BORRELIOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rare complication of neuroborreliosis; may present with headache, alteration of consciousness, seizures, and/or focal signs (Uldrey, 1987) (Brogan et al, 1990).
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CNS EFFECTS
    a) Studies of nonhuman primates indicate that involvement of the CNS reproducibly occurs by one month post-inoculation and is preceded by a brief spirochetemia (Pachner, 1995) 1995a).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) About 10% of patients have symptoms suggestive of hepatitis, including anorexia (Steere et al, 1983a). In one series, anorexia was present in about 30% of patients but was not significantly associated with abnormal liver enzymes (Horowitz et al, 1996).
    B) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea and vomiting, suggestive of hepatitis, occur in about 10% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a). In one series, nausea and vomiting were present in about 30% of patients but was not significantly associated with abnormal liver enzymes (Horowitz et al, 1996).
    b) May be more common in children; in one series 20% of children with stage I and 1/3 of those with stage II LD complained of nausea (Gerber et al, 1996a).
    c) In one study, 7 (10%) of the 69 patients with Lyme disease developed nausea (Petersen et al, 2015).
    C) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Right upper quadrant pain accompanied by nausea and vomiting, suggestive of hepatitis, is present in about 10% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a).
    b) May be more common in children; in one series abdominal pain was present in about 20% of children with stage I or stage II LD (Gerber et al, 1996a).
    D) WEIGHT LOSS FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In one study, about 10% of patients reported weight loss (up to 10 kg) (Steere et al, 1983a).
    E) SPLENOMEGALY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Noted in approximately 5% of cases. Its significance is undetermined (Steere et al, 1983a).
    F) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) About 2% of patients will experience diarrhea (Steere et al, 1983a), which may be more common in children. In one series, 15% of children with stage I and 20% of those with Stage II LD complained of diarrhea (Gerber et al, 1996a).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) WBC count ranges from 4600 to 14,100/mm(3). The WBC count is elevated above 10,000/mm(3) in about 8% of patients and above 12,000/mm(3) in about 5% (Steere et al, 1983a; Nadelman et al, 1996).
    b) In one study, 8 of 20 patients with cardiac involvement had elevated WBC counts ranging from 6600 to 18,000/mm(3) (median, 9100/mm(3)) (Steere et al, 1980b).
    B) LEUKOPENIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A case of early LD presenting with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia has been reported. Also suggests coinfection with Ehrlichia or Babesia (Gunthard et al, 1996).
    C) WHITE BLOOD CELL FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Polymorphonuclear counts ranging from 39 to 83/mm(3) (median, 68) have been reported in patients with cardiac involvement. Band forms ranged from 0 to 13% (median, 4%) (Steere et al, 1980b).
    D) EOSINOPHIL COUNT RAISED
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Peripheral eosinophilia has been described with borrelial fasciitis (Granter et al, 1996).
    E) ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) HEMATOCRIT, DECREASED: In one study, anemia was present in about 12% of patients on initial presentation. During remission, the hematocrit value usually returns to normal (Steere et al, 1983a).
    b) Another study found an incidence of only 3% among culture-confirmed cases (Nadelman et al, 1996).
    c) In one series, no patient had depressed haptoglobin level suggestive of intravascular hemolysis (Steere et al, 1983a).
    d) Four of 20 patients with cardiac involvement in the above series had anemia; hematocrit values ranged from 31% to 48% (median, 40%) (Steere et al, 1983a).
    F) ESR RAISED
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) An elevated ESR (greater than 30 mm/hr) is the most common laboratory abnormality noted: 25% to 50% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a; Agger et al, 1991; Nadelman et al, 1996).
    b) While EM was present, the ESR was found to be elevated (4 to 46 mm/hr) in a small subset of patients who subsequently developed arthritis, but it was normal in patients in whom arthritis did not develop (Steere et al, 1977a).
    c) The ESR in patients with chronic arthritis ranges from 4 to 54 mm/hr (median, 24 mm/hr)(Steere et al, 1979a).
    d) In patients with cardiac involvement, the ESR ranges from 3 to 74 mm/hr (median, 47 mm/hr) (Steere et al, 1980b).
    e) ESRs ranging from 2 to 46 mm/hr (median, 22 mm/hr) have been reported in patients with neurologic complications (Reik et al, 1979).
    G) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Coexistent thrombocytopenia and LD has been reported. In endemic areas, LD should be suspected in patients who present with flu-like symptoms and thrombocytopenia, particularly in absence of EM (Ballard et al, 1994; Gunthard et al, 1996).
    b) In one series, thrombocytopenia was present in only 1.5% of culture confirmed cases of EM (Nadelman et al, 1996). Platelet count normalizes shortly following antibiotic therapy (Ballard et al, 1994). Also suggests coinfection with Ehrlichia or Babesia.

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ERYTHEMA MIGRANS (EM): Hallmark of early localized LD, present in 70% to 80% of patients (Bacon et al, 2008). Distinctive erythematous, maculopapular, commonly round or oval, expanding, annular skin lesion greater than 5 cm in diameter occurring 3 to 32 days (median 7 to 10 days) after (and at the site of) the tick bite (Weissman et al, 1999; Edlow, 1999; Sigal, 1998; Nadelman & Wormser, 1998). Not present in late disease, although patients may recall a prior rash compatible with EM (Bachman & Srivastava, 1998; CDC, 1991; Agger et al, 1991; Steere, 1989; Levine et al, 1991; Williams et al, 1990; Asch et al, 1994; Wormser et al, 1997).
    1) Displays central clearing, induration, and a bright red outer border that is often warm; patients commonly describe the lesion as burning or, occasionally, as itchy or painful (Steere et al, 1983a; Steere, 1989; Berger, 1989). The central area may be blue, purpuric, indurated, vesiculated (Goldberg et al, 1992), necrotic, or ulcerated. The lesions, while typically round, may be oval, triangular, or linear. Erythema migrans is a red, expanding "bull's-eye" lesion seen at the bite site (Modly & Burnett, 1988).
    2) In adults, the most frequent bite sites are the thigh, back, and shoulders; groin and axillae also may be affected. In young children, the head and neck are the most common sites; in older children, the legs and back predominate (Nadelman et al, 1996; Gerber et al, 1996a).
    3) Secondary skin lesions may appear within several days after developing the initial EM lesion, patients often develop multiple annular, evanescent, secondary lesions at other sites. These lesions contain viable spirochetes and are presumably due to hematogenous spread of organism(Steere et al, 1983a; Steere, 1989; Melski et al, 1993; Nadelman & Wormser, 1995).
    b) HYPESTHESIA: Approximately 25% of patients with EM or arthritis have intermittent periods of regional or generalized hypesthesia, described as an unpleasant increased awareness or sensitivity of the skin to touch or temperature. The scalp is most commonly affected (Steere et al, 1977a).
    c) LYMPHOCYTOMA, BORRELIA: A red to dark bluish-red nodule or swelling a few centimeters in diameter is a rare manifestation of LD in Europe. Most common site is on the ear lobe in children and on the nipple in adults; also may occur on nose, scrotum, upper arm, shoulder. May be painful to touch (Pohl-Koppe et al, 1998; Strle et al, 1996c; Strle et al, 1992; Gautier et al, 1995; Albrecht et al, 1991). A tick-associated EM-like rash illness caused by an agent other than B burgdorferi has been reported in southern US; suspected agent is carried by A americanum ticks and may be a spirochete (Kirkland et al, 1997).
    d) ACRODERMATITIS CHRONICA ATROPHICANS: Chronic progressive skin disorder that occurs as a late manifestation of untreated cutaneous Lyme disease; occurs most commonly in elderly patients, with predominance in females (Asbrink, 1991; Kaufman et al, 1989; Patmas, 1993). Characterized in initial stages by edematous infiltration with bluish-red discoloration that progresses over years to atrophic lesions resembling localized scleroderma. Lesions often develop slowly and insidiously (Asbrink, 1991).
    1) Primarily involves extensor surfaces of extremities, most commonly lower leg; lesions also may appear on buttocks and elbows (Kaufman et al, 1989; Asbrink, 1991).
    2) Lesions do not heal spontaneously; associated with peripheral neuropathy and musculoskeletal pains. Often misdiagnosed as circulatory insufficiency (Asbrink, 1991).
    3) Spirochetes have been cultured from skin biopsy of untreated patients; antibiotic treatment generally gives good resolution in early stages, but late epidermal atrophy is irreversible (O'Connell, 1995).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) JOINT PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Arthralgia noted early in the course in 33% to 80% of cases (Williams & Rolles, 1986; Steere et al, 1987; Cristofaro et al, 1987; Agger et al, 1991; Moscatello et al, 1991; Asch et al, 1994; Gerber et al, 1996a). Frank arthritis, typically the last manifestation, is found as an early sign in up to 40% of patients (Asch et al, 1994); may be sole presenting sign, especially in children (Steere, 1995).
    b) Usually develops 4 weeks following erythema migrans rash but ranges from several days to years. Only about 50% of children with arthralgia have a history of erythema migrans or other rash (Eichenfield et al, 1986)(Culp, 1987).
    c) Chronic arthritis develops in about 10% of patients. Chronic or recurrent arthritis appears to be more common in those with HLA-DR2, -DR3, or -DR4 specificity (Shapiro, 1995; Steere, 1995).
    d) Arthralgias are typically migratory, usually affecting one location at a time. Arthritis is usually monarticular or oligoarticular but is occasionally migratory; usually affects the knees, shoulders, elbows, ankles, wrists, and temporomandibular joints. When chronic arthritis occurs, it commonly affects one or both knees. In children, more than 90% of arthritis occurs in the knee (Shapiro, 1995)( Huppertz, 1995)(Asch et al, 1994)(Steere, 1983)(Steere et al, 1987).
    e) Warmth and swelling of involved joints will be noted in patients with arthritis (Steere et al, 1977b). Onset of arthritis is typically sudden, with involvement of one or more large joints, particularly the knees; small joints of the fingers and toes may also be involved.
    B) EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) JOINT EDEMA: Physical examination of patients with arthritis reveals a swollen, often warm, but rarely erythematous joint (Steere et al, 1977a). Onset of arthritis is typically sudden, with involvement of one or more large joints, particularly the knees; small joints of the fingers and toes may also be involved. Childhood presentation is usually subacute swelling of knee joint (Shapiro, 1995).
    C) MUSCLE PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Early symptom in about 50% of patients. Some patients have only generalized aching and stiffness, while others have severe cramping, particularly in the thighs, calves, and back (Steere et al, 1983a; Cristofaro et al, 1987; Moscatello et al, 1991).
    b) The muscle pain is typically migratory, usually affecting one location at a time, and lasts only hours in a given location (Steere et al, 1983a).
    c) Tenderness in the muscles of the calves, thighs, and back may be noted (Steere et al, 1983a).
    D) DISORDER OF TENDON
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) TENDON PAIN: Typically migratory, usually affects only one location at a time, and lasts hours in a given location (Steere et al, 1983a).
    E) BONE PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) May occur during the febrile ("flu") syndrome, simultaneously with or immediately after the onset of EM (Bowen & Griffin, 1984). The pain is generally migratory, although only one location is affected at a time, and lasts only for hours in a given location (Steere et al, 1983a).
    b) Diffuse fasciitis characterized by pain and stiffness in an extremity associated with thickening of skin and subcutaneous tissue has been reported as an expression of LD (Granter et al, 1996).
    c) Stiff hand is occasionally a manifestation of Lyme disease (Steere et al, 1983a).
    F) OSTEOMYELITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Subacute multiple-site osteomyelitis caused by B burgdorferi has been reported. Presence of the spirochetes in bone was documented both by culture and PCR (Oksi et al, 1994). Postulated that the spirochetes enter the bone via the hematogenous route and cause multiple lesions in the highly vascularized metaphyses of long bones (Oksi et al, 1994).
    G) MYOSITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Characterized by severe proximal muscular pain and weakness accompanied by increased CK levels and EMG alterations (Schoenen, 1989; Kengen, 1989; Atlas, 1988; (Horowitz et al, 1994; Ilowite, 1995). Also has been associated with new onset of dermatomyositis(Horowitz et al, 1994).
    b) May occur early or late in course of LD; improvement may take months. Usually occurs near involved joint or peripheral nerve (Schoenen, 1989; Kengen, 1989; Atlas, 1988; (Horowitz et al, 1994; Ilowite, 1995).
    c) Muscle biopsy is diagnostic. Gallium-67 imaging shows abnormal skeletal muscle uptake (Kengen, 1989).
    d) Diffuse fasciitis characterized by pain and stiffness in an extremity associated with thickening of skin and subcutaneous tissue has been reported (Granter et al, 1996).
    H) FIBROMYOSITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) May occur following antibiotic treatment of LD. Does not represent ongoing infection with B burgdorferi (Hsu et al, 1993) (Sigal, 1993) (Dinerman & Steere, 1992).
    I) ARTHRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ARTHRITIS, LYME: Most common manifestation of deep-tissue dysfunction, occurring in 40% to 50% of early disseminated cases and in up to 100% of late disease (Steere, 1998)( Aggar, 1991)(Asch et al, 1994).
    b) Spectrum ranges from recurrent episodes of joint, periarticular, or musculoskeletal pain (20%), to intermittent attacks of monarticular or oligoarticular arthritis in large joints (50%), to chronic erosive disease (10%); about 20% of untreated patients have no subsequent manifestations of Lyme disease (Steere, 1998; Steere, 1989; Steere, 1989; Steere et al, 1987; Asch et al, 1994).
    c) Almost all patients who develop arthritis have a prodrome of headache, neck stiffness, chills, fever, and malaise. Arthritis as the sole presenting sign of LD appears to be more common in children than adults. Physical examination reveals a very swollen, often hot, joint that is rarely erythematous.
    d) In children, the usual presentation is a subacute effusion of the knee. Arthritis appears to be milder and of shorter duration in younger versus older children (Steere, 1998; Steere, 1989; Steere et al, 1977a)(Steere, 1995)(Culp, 1988)(Eichenfield et al, 1986; Cristofaro et al, 1987; Agger et al, 1991; Levine et al, 1991; Asch et al, 1994; Shapiro, 1995).
    e) Temporomandibular joint arthritis may be chronic or recurrent over years.
    J) PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) NECK PAIN: Present as an early symptom in 40% to 50% of patients (Steere et al, 1983a; Agger et al, 1991; Moscatello et al, 1991). Nuchal rigidity may occur early in nearly 50% of patients. Patients with neck stiffness at the onset of illness have fewer late complications (Steere et al, 1983a). On physical examination, almost all patients with meningitis have mild stiffness on extreme neck flexion, but Kernig and Brudzinski signs are usually absent (Pachner & Steere, 1985).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Study results of pregnancy outcomes in women with LD are variable.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Intrauterine exposure to B burgdorferi can cause infection of the fetus, but this probably is a rare occurrence (Maraspin, 1996; (Steere, 1989; APA Comm Infect Dis, 1991; Sigal, 1992).
    2) Adverse outcomes of pregnancies, including anomalies and fetal death, in women with LD have been reported (Schlesinger, 1985; Weber, 1988; MacDonald, 1986, 1987; Markowitz, 1986). However, prospective controlled studies from both endemic and nonendemic areas found no evidence of maternal-fetal transmission of the Lyme disease spirochete (Williams, 1988; Diesk, 1989; Zalneraitis, 1990; (Sigal, 1992) Nadal, 1989).
    3) Results of a prospective population-based study indicate that maternal exposure to LD before conception or during pregnancy is not associated with fetal death, prematurity, or congenital malformations taken as a whole. However, tick bites within 3 years preceding conception were significantly associated with congenital malformations (usually minor), but this may have reflected reporting differences between exposed and unexposed women, the possibility of LD causing such defects cannot be ruled out (Strobino, 1993).
    4) A retrospective study in an endemic area concluded that congenital neuroborreliosis is either not occurring or is occurring at an extremely low rate (Gerber & Zalneraitis, 1994a). A cross-sectional study reported more cardiac defects than expected among neonates born in an endemic area (Williams, 1995); however, a case-control study found no increased risk of congenital heart defects among infants born to women treated for LD during pregnancy (Storbino, 1999).
    5) Current evidence suggests that termination of pregnancy complicated by Lyme disease is NOT indicated. Oral antibiotic therapy usually is effective, although some authorities recommend giving IV antibiotics in this circumstance (Sigal, 1992).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Transmission of Borellia through breast feeding has never been documented (Shapiro, 1995).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Diagnosis of LD is usually clinical; patients with an erythema migrans rash can be diagnosed clinically. Laboratory studies should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Patients may be seronegative and have LD during the early stage of disease or patients may be seropositive and not have active disease (ie, past infection).
    B) GENERAL laboratory studies: CBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and liver enzymes are generally unnecessary, depending on patient's presentation. However, it is common that ESR may be elevated and hepatic transaminases may be mildly elevated.
    C) Laboratory support of diagnosis is essential in suspected extracutaneous LD. Confirmation of late disease requires objective evidence of a clinical manifestation of disseminated disease plus laboratory evidence of infection.
    D) CULTURE: Requires special techniques; low yield from blood/CSF; organism (B burgdorferi) may be cultured from skin biopsy or aspirate of erythema migrans lesion.
    E) SEROLOGY: Serologic testing is insensitive during the first few weeks of infection. The presence of an erythema migrans rash can be diagnostic. A single positive serologic test cannot distinguish between active and past infection, due to antibody persistence. It also cannot be used to measure treatment response.
    F) ANTIBODIES: Demonstration of diagnostic IgM or IgG antibodies to B burgdorferi in serum or CSF. CDC currently recommends a two-test approach using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) (rarely used) followed by Western blot is recommended. If the first step is negative, no further testing of the specimen is recommended. If the first step is positive or equivocal the second step should be an immunoblot test (usually a "Western blot"). The results are only considered positive if the EIA/IFA and the immunoblot are both positive. It is recommended that the 2-steps are done together.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) LABORATORY CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014):
    a) Diagnosis of LD is usually clinical; patients with an erythema migrans rash can be diagnosed clinically. Laboratory studies should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Patients may be seronegative and have LD during the early stage of disease or patients may be seropositive and not have active disease (ie, past infection).
    b) GENERAL laboratory studies: CBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and liver enzymes are generally unnecessary, depending on patient's presentation. However, it is common that ESR may be elevated and hepatic transaminases may be mildly elevated.
    c) Laboratory support of diagnosis is essential in suspected extracutaneous LD. Confirmation of late disease requires objective evidence of a clinical manifestation of disseminated disease plus laboratory evidence of infection.
    d) CULTURE: Requires special techniques; low yield from blood/CSF; organism (B burgdorferi) may be cultured from skin biopsy or aspirate of erythema migrans lesion.
    e) SEROLOGY: Serologic testing is insensitive during the first few weeks of infection. The presence of an erythema migrans rash can be diagnostic. A single positive serologic test cannot distinguish between active and past infection, due to antibody persistence. It also cannot be used to measure treatment response.
    1) Suggested schedule for testing:
    a) EARLY LOCALIZED LD: Serology testing is not indicated if diagnosis is certain (generally negative in early disease); treatment with oral antibiotics is sufficient.
    b) EARLY DISSEMINATED LD: ELISA (Western blot if equivocal); treat based on clinical findings, exposure; consider repeat testing in 2 to 4 weeks if initially negative.
    c) LATE LD: ELISA (Western blot if equivocal); if negative, LD is unlikely.
    f) ANTIBODIES: Demonstration of diagnostic IgM or IgG antibodies to B burgdorferi in serum or CSF. CDC currently recommends a two-test approach using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) (rarely used) followed by Western blot is recommended. If the first step is negative, no further testing of the specimen is recommended. If the first step is positive or equivocal the second step should be an immunoblot test (usually a "Western blot"). The results are only considered positive if the EIA/IFA and the immunoblot are both positive. It is recommended that the 2-steps are done together (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2011).
    g) If a patient has been ill for more than a month, only IgG testing should be performed and not the IgM (ie, it is not sufficient to diagnose current disease). Both the EIA and IFA tests have low specificity and may yield false-positive results and can cross react with other antibodies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014).
    2) LOW PROBABILITY OF DISEASE: Patients presenting with such symptoms as arthralgia, myalgia, headache, fatigue, or palpitations alone, without the objective signs of LD, have an extremely low probability of LD and should not be referred for laboratory testing.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) OTHER
    a) Culture is not feasible in most practice settings (Sood, 1999). Although B burgdorferi grows well in the laboratory, it is not easily recovered from clinical specimens other than biopsy samples of EM lesions (60% to 80%) (Am Coll Physicians, 1997; Tugwell et al, 1997). Culture yield also is high from blood in early disseminated LD but is very low from CSF and almost negligible from synovial fluid (Sood, 1999).
    1) Culture medium is expensive to purchase, and the procedure and controls are laborious to maintain (Sood, 1999).
    2) LYME ARTHRITIS
    a) A single laboratory marker for the diagnosis of lyme arthritis is not available. Increased levels of IgG antibodies to B burgdorferi can be found in the serum of patients with Lyme arthritis, however a positive serology test alone does not confirm the diagnosis. Usually a diagnosis is made by eliminating other possible causes (eg, osteoarthritis, trauma, septic arthritis). Synovial fluid testing to detect B. burgdorferi is recommended when possible (Stanek et al, 2011).
    3) LYME NEUROBORRELIOSIS
    a) A painful meningoradiculoneuritis and unilateral or bilateral facial palsy that may develop within weeks of infection. Diagnosis is made in part by clinical manifestations and inflammation in CSF fluid (ie, pleocytosis) and the presence of intrathecal specific antibody synthesis (ie, IgM and/or IgG and/or IgA) (Stanek et al, 2011).
    4) LYME CARDITIS
    a) A rare acute onset of A-V (l-lll) conduction disturbances and arrhythmias can be detected by the presence of B. burgdorferi by culture and/or PCR from an endomyocardial biopsy as well as the presence of a recent history of erythema migrans and/or neurologic disorders (Stanek et al, 2011).
    5) CULTURE, SKIN LESION
    a) INDICATIONS:
    1) May be useful in patients in whom primary EM lesions are suspected. Saline-lavage needle aspiration and 2-mm punch biopsies of the leading edge of suspected lesions successfully obtain organisms in 60% to 80% of cases (Tugwell et al, 1998; Kuiper et al, 1994) (Am Coll Physicians, 1998; Mitchell, 1993; Melski, 1993).
    2) Skin biopsies from sites of preceding EM may be positive for B burgdorferi even after disappearance of rash (Kuiper et al, 1994) (Strle, 1995).
    6) CULTURE, BLOOD
    a) Because of low yield and requirements for specialized techniques, routine culturing of blood is not recommended (Wallach, 1993; Berger, 1994).
    b) Spirochetemia appears to occur early in the disease course. Demonstration of spirochetemia in patients with EM without any extracutaneous evidence of disseminated LD has therapeutic significance (Berger, 1994). Combined culture-PCR test is more rapid and specific than culture alone (Schwartz, 1993).
    b) EXAMINATION, CEREBROSPINAL FLUID
    1) Because of low yield and requirements for specialized techniques, routine culturing of CSF is not recommended. Clinical diagnosis of neuroborreliosis can be confirmed by the presence of CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis. Mean values for the CSF WBC count are 153/mm(3) with 82% lymphocytes (Steere et al, 1983aa).
    2) In one study, patients with early neuroborreliosis and predominantly peripheral symptoms had higher CSF WBC counts than patients with late disease and central findings (mean=218/mm(3) vs 95/mm(3)) (Kaiser, 1994).
    3) The combination of CSF pleocytosis and acute facial paralysis, particularly bilaterally, suggests the second stage of Lyme disease (Lewis, 1986; Clark, 1985).
    c) PROTEIN, CEREBROSPINAL FLUID, INCREASED
    1) Mean CSF protein value in patients with aseptic meningitis due to Lyme disease is 70 mg/dL (Steere et al, 1983aa).
    2) In one study, the combination of increased CSF protein, decreased glucose, and lymphocytic pleocytosis, considered to be pathognomonic of tuberculous meningitis, was present in 6/59 cases of Lyme meningitis (Lakos, 1992).
    d) GLUCOSE, CEREBROSPINAL FLUID
    1) The CSF glucose level in patients with aseptic meningitis due to Lyme disease is within normal limits (mean value, 54 mg/dL) (Steere et al, 1983aa).
    2) In one study, the combination of increased CSF protein, decreased glucose, and lymphocytic pleocytosis, considered to be pathognomonic of tuberculous meningitis, was present in 6/59 cases of Lyme meningitis (Lakos, 1992).
    e) ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY, CEREBROSPINAL FLUID
    1) IgG and IgM antibodies to B burgdorferi can be detected in CSF by ELISA or IFA in most patients with neuroborreliosis; intrathecal production of immunoglobulins can be calculated by the Reiter formula (Kaiser, 1994; Tumani et al, 1995).
    2) In one study, patients with early LD had higher levels of intrathecal synthesis of total IgM and IgM specific antibodies, while patients with late stages had IgG predominance (Kaiser, 1994).
    3) Another study found acute disease was best differentiated from past disease by quantification of a number of CSF variables, including cell count, activated B cells, CNS-derived immunoglobulin patterns, CSF/serum albumin ratios, and B burgdorferi specific CNS antibodies (Tumani et al, 1995).
    4) Antigen-capture ELISA can detect B burgdorferi antigens in the CSF of patients with suspected neuroborreliosis even in the absence of detectable antibodies by standard ELISA (Coyle, 1993).
    f) WHITE BLOOD CELLS, SYNOVIAL FLUID, INCREASED
    1) The mean WBC count is 24,500/mm(3), with a range of 2100 to 72,250/mm(3). The differential count consists primarily of granulocytes and ranges from 16% to 88% (median, 80%) (Steere, 1989).

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Abnormalities on chest films are rare. Findings in one patient included cardiomegaly and pulmonary hypertension, which resolved after five days (Steere, 1980b).
    B) CT RADIOGRAPH
    1) COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, HEAD
    a) Indicated when differentiation from brain abscess or other structural lesions is needed.
    b) Findings usually are normal; however, a normal CT should not deter diagnosis of neuroborreliosis, even in setting of focal neurologic findings (Rafto, 1990).
    C) RADIOGRAPHY-OTHER
    1) RADIOGRAPHY, JOINT
    a) INDICATIONS:
    1) ACUTE ARTHRITIS: Should be obtained routinely. Although Lyme arthritis does not typically display bone or joint changes early in the course, mimicking arthritides may be distinguishable.
    2) CHRONIC ARTHRITIS: All patients with chronic arthritis; in one series, abnormalities were noted in 20 of 24 patients with chronic knee arthritis (Lawson & Steere, 1985).
    3) FINDINGS:
    a) SOFT TISSUE CHANGES: Joint effusions and soft tissue edema are most common changes. Other findings include synovial proliferation of bursae, and thickening or calcification of tendons and ligaments. The infrapatellar fat pad may show an unusual pattern in which fat is interspersed with irregular mottled densities suggestive of edema (Lawson & Steere, 1985) (Huppertz, 1995).
    b) CARTILAGINOUS CHANGES: Loss or calcification of articular cartilage or menisci.
    c) OSSEOUS CHANGES: Include erosions, subarticular cysts, juxtaarticular osteoporosis, sclerosis of subarticular bone, and osteophytes. These changes are consistent with degenerative or inflammatory arthritis, or both.
    2) RADIOGRAPHY, SKULL
    a) Not recommended routinely. Skull films were normal in five patients with meningoencephalitis (Reik, 1979).
    3) ARTHROGRAPHY
    a) May display multiple filling defects of the joint. Contrast media may extend into erosions of the femur and tibia (Lawson & Steere, 1985).
    4) ANGIOGRAPHY, RADIONUCLIDE, CARDIAC
    a) INDICATIONS: Rarely indicated in Lyme disease patients with myopericardial involvement; good noninvasive assessment of cardiac function in questionable cases.
    b) FINDINGS: Demonstrated mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) in 4 of 12 patients with active cardiac involvement. LVEF ranged from 47% to 53% (n>/=55%), and all returned to normal during remission (Steere, 1980b).
    5) ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
    a) INDICATIONS: Lyme disease patients with radiculoneuritis.
    b) FINDINGS:
    1) Confirmation of clinically diagnosed radiculitis was obtained by electromyography in three patients with Lyme disease.
    2) They had neuropathic abnormalities in muscles innervated by one or more roots, but nerve conduction velocities were near normal.
    3) Of two patients with a clinical picture suggestive of mononeuritis multiplex, one had marked slowing of nerve conduction velocities in multiple nerves (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    6) ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    a) Cardiac ultrasonography displayed normal valvular structures, chamber dimensions, and wall thickness in patients with cardiac involvement (Steere, 1980b). This is a good noninvasive test to rule out structural cardiac abnormalities when heart block or arrhythmias exist.
    D) NUCLEAR SCANS
    1) BONE SCAN: May be helpful in diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. Findings are nonspecific but show articular and periarticular abnormalities typical of Lyme arthritis (e.g., asymmetric large joint disease) (Brown, 1989).
    E) MRI
    1) IMAGING, MAGNETIC RESONANCE, HEAD-
    a) May be helpful in diagnosis of neuroborreliosis. Findings usually are normal; however, a normal MRI should not deter diagnosis of neuroborreliosis, even in setting of focal neurologic findings (Rafto, 1990) (Belman, 1992).
    b) Diagnosis should be considered with MRI findings of meningeal enhancement and/or single or multiple parenchymal abnormalities in appropriate clinical setting (e.g., endemic area, EM, meningitis, cranial neuritis, radiculoneuritis) (Rafto, 1990) (Belman, 1992). Normal pressure hydrocephalus has also been reported (Danek, 1996).

Methods

    A) GENERAL
    1) BIOPSY, SKIN LESION
    a) INDICATIONS
    1) Isolation of the spirochete from specimens obtained with a punch biopsy of the outside edge or advancing margin of the rash often is possible, particularly in patients with primary or secondary EM (Berger, 1992; Mitchell, 1993; Melski, 1993; Nadelman, 1996).
    2) Aids definitive diagnosis of LD in patients with only primary EM who often lack constitutional symptoms, have nondiagnostic lesions, or who are seronegative (Melski, 1993).
    2) ASPIRATION, NEEDLE, SOFT TISSUE
    a) Use of a single-needle aspiration is a quick, inexpensive, and easily done technique for obtaining specimens for culture from EM lesions (Agger, 1993).
    1) A small amount of subcutaneous tissue fluid is aspirated with 3 back-and-forth passes beneath the edge of the lesions using an 18- or 20-g needle on a 3-mL syringe; no saline is injected.
    2) The needle and syringe are then flushed with 1 to 2 mL of fresh BSK-II media. After incubation, dark-field microscopy is done weekly for 4 weeks.
    3) BIOPSY, SYNOVIAL TISSUE
    a) INDICATIONS: Chronic arthritis to rule out chronic infectious etiologies.
    b) FINDINGS:
    1) Examination of synovium may demonstrate hypertrophy or pannus formation, vascular proliferation, and heavy mononuclear cell infiltrates. This is indistinguishable from the histologic picture seen with rheumatoid arthritis (Steere, 1977).
    2) B burgdorferi DNA can be detected in the synovial tissue of most patients with Lyme arthritis using PCR techniques (Jaulhac, 1996).
    4) ARTHROCENTESIS
    a) INDICATIONS: All cases of acute arthritis to help rule out infectious etiologies. Joint aspiration also may help relieve pain and minimize disability in selected cases.
    b) FINDINGS:
    1) WBC COUNT:
    a) The mean WBC count is 24,500/mm(3), with a range of 2100 to 72,250/mm(3). The differential count consists primarily of granulocytes and ranges from 16% to 88% (median, 80%) (Steere, 1989).
    b) Because these counts are similar to those seen in other acute inflammatory and infectious diseases, cultures are necessary to help differentiate Lyme disease from other types of arthritis.
    2) CRYOGLOBULIN:
    a) Joint fluid cryoglobulin values may help support the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis and should be obtained when arthrocentesis is performed.
    b) Joint fluid cryoglobulin contains approximately 5-fold greater amounts of cryoprotein and IgG than do serum cryoglobulins.
    3) RHEUMATOID FACTOR: Rheumatoid factor is absent from joint fluid.
    5) LUMBAR PUNCTURE
    a) INDICATIONS:
    1) All patients with meningeal signs. The presentation of Lyme meningoencephalitis can mimic that of bacterial infections, and CSF analysis is necessary for differentiation.
    2) Patients with a facial palsy may have a CSF pleocytosis even in the absence of meningeal signs; the need for LP in all patients with facial palsy is controversial (Rahn & Malawista, 1991; Pachner, 1995).
    b) FINDINGS:
    1) WBC COUNT:
    a) A mean value of 166 WBCs/mm(3) (range 15 to 700), with 93% lymphocytes (range 40% to 100%), was found in 38 patients with Lyme meningitis. A spinal fluid pleocytosis, however, can also be found in other spirochetal infections and viral aseptic meningitis (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    b) In one study, patients with early neuroborreliosis and predominantly peripheral symptoms had higher CSF WBC counts than patients with late disease and central findings (mean=218/mm(3) vs 95/mm(3)) (Kaiser, 1994).
    2) PROTEIN: Elevated protein levels are commonly found in CSF. A mean level of 79 mg/dL (range 8 to 400) was found in patients with Lyme meningitis (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    3) GLUCOSE: CSF glucose levels are generally normal in patients with Lyme meningitis. A mean value of 49 mg/dL (range 33 to 61) was found in 38 patients studied (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    4) OPENING PRESSURE: The opening CSF pressure of patients with Lyme meningitis is generally normal (Pachner & Steere, 1985).
    5) CSF ANTIBODY: Antibodies to B burgdorferi should be measured in the CSF, if testing is available. Increased levels of CSF antibodies relative to the sera strongly suggest Lyme-related meningitis (Rahn & Malawista, 1991).
    B) BIOASSAY
    1) ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY, BORRELIA BURGDORFERI
    a) INDICATIONS: For patients who present with other objective clinical signs (in whom pretest probability is intermediate), a two-step testing strategy is recommended consisting of an initial assay that detects either total or class-specific antibodies (IgM or IgG) using ELISA (or IFA) followed by confirmatory Western immunoblot (Brown et al, 1999; Am Coll Physicians, 1997; Tugwell et al, 1997; CDC, 1995a).
    b) INTERPRETATION: IgM levels usually peak 3 to 6 weeks after infection; IgG antibodies begin to be detectable several weeks after infection and may continue to develop for several months and generally persist for years (Brown et al, 1999; Am Coll Physicians, 1997; Tugwell et al, 1997; CDC, 1995a):
    c) NEGATIVE RESULT: Indicates only that there was no serologic evidence of infection with B burgdorferi. It should not be used as the basis for excluding B burgdorferi as the cause of illness, especially if the blood was collected within 2 weeks of symptom onset.
    d) POSITIVE/EQUIVOCAL RESULT: Presumptive evidence of presence of anti-Bb. Always should be followed by second-step testing and should not be reported until the second step testing is completed.
    e) ACCURACY: Even using the two-step approach, sensitivity and specificity of the combined test results are inadequate. Because assays for anti-Bb should be used only for supporting a clinical diagnosis of LD, the result of the first-step assay is best described as "initial" rather than "screening." The second-step Western-blot assay is best described as "supplemental" rather than "confirmatory", because of the low specificity for detecting IgM anti-Bb. Thus, a positive IgM anti-Bb result alone is not adequate for supporting a diagnosis of LD in persons with illness of greater than 1-month duration (Brown et al, 1999; Am Coll Physicians, 1997; Tugwell et al, 1997; CDC, 1995a).
    f) Some controversy exists on the use of the two-step approach in patients who are seronegative for LD because of the possibility of withholding treatment on patients with false-negative results (Liegner & Kochevar, 1998; McCaulley, 1998; Blaauw & van der Linden, 1998; Tugwell et al, 1998).
    2) POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAY
    a) GENERAL:
    1) Highly specific and sensitive assay but is not available for routine use (Segal, 1998; (Rosa & Schwan, 1989) Stiernstedt, 1991). Advantages include rapidity (2 d), positive results early in disease, and avoidance of difficulties of identify the organism by culture or immunohistochemistry (Sigal, 1994b) (Goodman, 1995) (Magnarelli, 1995).
    2) Can help in making sound clinical judgments when interpreted with knowledge of the clinical context and limitation of the technique (Sigal, 1994b).
    3) May prove to be particularly useful for diagnosis early in disease when serology is negative, in neuroborreliosis, and for monitoring response to therapy (Kruger & Pulz, 1991; Keller et al, 1992) (Jaulhac, 1991) (Pachner & Delaney, 1993) (Goodman, 1995) (Schmidt, 1996) (Mouritsen, 1996).
    4) Can detect B burgdorferi in synovial fluid, although in one study, detection was more efficient in synovial tissue samples; may be able to show whether Lyme arthritis that persists after antibiotic treatment is due to persistence of the spirochete (Nocton, 1994; Jaulhac, 1996).
    b) ACCURACY:
    1) Overall specificity is 96.4%, but sensitivity depends on body fluid tested (76.7% overall; 100% for CSF and urine; 80% to 85% for synovial fluid; 59% for serum); 3.6% false-positive rate (Liebling, 1993). Concordance between laboratories and primer probe sets remains limited (Nocton, 1996).
    2) Can detect DNA from as few as 1 to 5 organisms, even those that are nonviable; however, contamination by even a single organism at any stage can cause a false-positive result. A positive result can suggest previous B burgdorferi infection and diagnosis of LD but is not proof of persistent infection (Sigal, 1994b; Magnarelli, 1995).
    3) A negative test does not rule out Lyme neuroborreliosis (Pachner & Delaney, 1993; Huppertz et al, 1993) (Nocton, 1996).
    4) False-negative results may occur because of the presence of polymerase "inhibitors" (e.g., hemoglobin) or because of paucity of organisms (Sigal, 1994b).
    5) Combined culture-PCR test is more rapid and specific than culture alone (Schwartz, 1993).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.6) DISPOSITION/BITE-STING EXPOSURE
    6.3.6.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/BITE-STING
    A) Hospital admission is needed for patients requiring IV rehydration or IV antibiotic therapy. Frequent reassessment, especially when the etiologic diagnosis is in doubt, is imperative. Patients with carditis, PR interval prolongation greater than 0.30 seconds or with high-degree AV block are at high risk of developing sudden complete heart block. Intensive monitoring and consideration of pacemaker insertion is required. Criteria for discharge include patients that are clinically improving and physically stable.
    6.3.6.2) HOME CRITERIA/BITE-STING
    A) Adequate compliance with oral antibiotic therapy should be assured, with follow-up arranged as appropriate. Education as to potential side effects of medicine and complications of the disease is necessary.
    6.3.6.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/BITE-STING
    A) Consultation with a rheumatologist or internist should be obtained for long-term follow-up of all patients with LD. Cardiology consultation should be considered in those patients manifesting myopericardial involvement. Orthopedic consultation may be appropriate in cases of chronic refractory arthritis necessitating synovectomy. Cases of LD during pregnancy should be reported to State health departments and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Poison centers can aid treatment by serving as a public health resource for the general public seeking advice.
    6.3.6.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/BITE-STING
    A) Patients with worsening symptoms that do not improve with oral antibiotic therapy should go to a healthcare facility for further evaluation and treatment.

Monitoring

    A) Diagnosis of LD is usually clinical; patients with an erythema migrans rash can be diagnosed clinically. Laboratory studies should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Patients may be seronegative and have LD during the early stage of disease or patients may be seropositive and not have active disease (ie, past infection).
    B) GENERAL laboratory studies: CBC, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and liver enzymes are generally unnecessary, depending on patient's presentation. However, it is common that ESR may be elevated and hepatic transaminases may be mildly elevated.
    C) Laboratory support of diagnosis is essential in suspected extracutaneous LD. Confirmation of late disease requires objective evidence of a clinical manifestation of disseminated disease plus laboratory evidence of infection.
    D) CULTURE: Requires special techniques; low yield from blood/CSF; organism (B burgdorferi) may be cultured from skin biopsy or aspirate of erythema migrans lesion.
    E) SEROLOGY: Serologic testing is insensitive during the first few weeks of infection. The presence of an erythema migrans rash can be diagnostic. A single positive serologic test cannot distinguish between active and past infection, due to antibody persistence. It also cannot be used to measure treatment response.
    F) ANTIBODIES: Demonstration of diagnostic IgM or IgG antibodies to B burgdorferi in serum or CSF. CDC currently recommends a two-test approach using a sensitive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) (rarely used) followed by Western blot is recommended. If the first step is negative, no further testing of the specimen is recommended. If the first step is positive or equivocal the second step should be an immunoblot test (usually a "Western blot"). The results are only considered positive if the EIA/IFA and the immunoblot are both positive. It is recommended that the 2-steps are done together.

Case Reports

    A) CHRONIC EFFECTS
    1) Gasser (1994) reported a case of an Austrian family, all of whom suffered from Lyme disease for up to 20 years. The mother first acquired the disease, then the father, and finally a child born later. The child was born with minor abnormalities; was physically weak; and irritable and depressed. Serology confirmed the diagnosis in all three people; combination antimicrobial treatments were successful. The author speculates about possible sexual and transplacental transmission of spirochetes in this case (Gasser et al, 1994).

Summary

    A) TOXIC DOSE: One tick is enough to cause an infection. Risk of infection is increased with tick attachment longer than 48 to 72 hours. With tick attachment of less than 48 hours, risk infection is unlikely, although the risk of local reaction to the bite or other tickborne diseases still exists.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) One tick is enough to cause an infection (Fowler, 1993).
    2) Likelihood of acquiring Lyme disease after a tick bite in an endemic area is 1% to 4% overall (Sood, 1997) (Shapiro, 1992) (Agre & Schwartz, 1991) (Costello, 1989); however, increased duration of tick attachment beyond 72 hours significantly increases odds of infection (20% vs 1% in one study) (Sood, 1997).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Spirochetes are introduced into the skin by the bite of the Ixodes tick. After an incubation period of 3 to 32 days, the organisms disseminate both intradermally and systemically. Cardiac, neurologic, and arthritic complications may occur. It is not yet understood why the spirochete is trophic for synovial tissue, skin, and cells of nervous system, or why it survives in these sites for prolonged periods of time. It does not appear to kill mammalian cells and apparently does not elaborate toxins (Steere, 1993a).
    B) IMMUNOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS: B burgdorferi induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses, as well as autoimmunity, nonspecific immune changes, and immunoregulatory abnormalities. Pathogenesis is probably a combination of organism-induced local inflammation, cytokine release, and autoimmunity (Sigal, 1989).
    C) IMMUNOPATHOGENETIC MECHANISMS (Sigal, 1989)
    1) ERYTHEMA MIGRANS
    a) Inflammation caused by local effects of B burgdorferi (septic process, cytokine production).
    b) Circulating immune complexes.
    2) NEUROLOGIC DISEASE
    a) Possible autoimmune mechanisms (antiaxonal antibodies, autoimmune T-cell activity).
    b) Vasculitis (peripheral nervous system damage).
    c) Inflammation caused by local effects of B burgdorferi (septic process, lymphocytic meningitis).
    d) Studies of Rhesus monkeys inoculated with B burgdorferi showed chronic infection of the CNS was detectable in all five animals by one month. Inflammatory changes were primarily limited to meninges, but data indicated direct spirochetal invasion of nervous tissue, despite lack of clinical symptoms (Pachner, 1995) 1995a).
    3) CARDIAC DISEASE: Inflammation caused by local effects of B burgdorferi (septic process). Myocardial specimens reveal lymphoplasmacytic interstitial infiltrates with variable amounts of necrosis, fibrosis, edema, and occasional spirochetal forms. Endocardial involvement is typically band- or plaque-like lymphoid and plasma cell infiltrate with occasional endarteritis obliterans (Sigal, 1995).
    4) ARTHRITIS
    a) Inflammation caused by local effects of B burgdorferi: septic process, cytokine production, immune complex-mediated chronic inflammation, antigen-induced arthritis. Evidence suggests that treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis may be an autoimmune disease (Gross, 1998).
    b) One study using PCR studies on synovial fluid found the persistence of spirochetal nucleic acids in affected joints, despite negative cultures. This suggests that persistent organisms and their components are important in maintaining ongoing immune and inflammatory processes even among some antibiotic-treated patients (Bradley et al, 1994).

Clinical Effects

    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) LYME DISEASE -
    1) Clinical Manifestations: Many infections are subclinical. Has been associated with lethargy, fever, lymphadenopathy, anorexia, lameness, arthritis, carditis, and kidney disease (May et al, 1990; Kornblatt et al, 1985; Levy & Duray, 1988; Magnarelli et al, 1987). Incubation period is 2 to 5 months (Appel et al, 1993).
    2) Acute, recurrent lameness with fibrinopurulent arthritis was the dominant sign seen in one study. Recovered dogs developed persistent mild polyarthritis (Appel et al, 1993).
    3) Diagnosis: Via ELISA blood test, history, and clinical signs (Greene, 1991). ELISA antibodies are first detected 4 to 6 weeks after exposure (Appel et al, 1993).
    11.1.5) EQUINE/HORSE
    A) LYME DISEASE -
    1) Clinical Manifestations: Lyme Disease is a subclinical infection in many cases. Signs include lethargy, and fever, and generalized lameness and arthritis.
    2) Diagnosis is via ELISA blood test, history, and clinical signs.

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Remove the patient and other animals from the tick infested area.
    2) Treatment should always be done on the advice and with the consultation of a veterinarian.
    3) Additional information regarding treatment of poisoned animals may be obtained from a Board Certified (ABVT) Veterinary Toxicologist (check with nearest veterinary school or veterinary diagnostic laboratory) or the National Animal Poison Control Center.
    4) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) Remove the offending tick if it is still on the animal. If none can be found, consider an insecticidal dip, especially with large animals, to remove ticks.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) DOGS/CATS
    1) ANAPHYLAXIS -
    a) AIRWAY - Maintain a patent airway via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy.
    b) EPINEPHRINE - For severe reactions.
    1) DOGS - 0.5 to 1 milliliter of 1:10,000 (DILUTE) solution intravenously or subcutaneously.
    2) CATS - 0.5 milliliter of 1:10,000 (DILUTE) solution intravenously or intramuscularly.
    3) DILUTION - Be sure to dilute epinephrine from the bottle (1:1000) one part to 9 parts saline to obtain the correct concentration (1:10,000).
    4) REPEAT DOSES - If indicated, doses may be repeated in 20 minutes.
    c) FLUID THERAPY -
    1) If necessary, begin fluid therapy at maintenance doses (66 milliliters solution/kilogram body weight/day) intravenously or, in hypotensive patients, at high doses (up to shock dose 60 milliliters/kilogram/hour.
    2) Monitor for urine production and pulmonary edema.
    d) ANTIHISTAMINES - Administer doxylamine succinate (1 to 2.2 milligram/kilogram subcutaneously or intramuscularly every 8 to 12 hours).
    e) STEROIDS - Administer dexamethasone sodium phosphate (1 to 5 milligrams/kilogram intravenously every 12 to 24 hours), or prednisone (1 to 5 milligram/kilogram intravenously every 1 to 6 hours).
    2) LYME DISEASE - Ampicillin (10 milligrams/kilogram orally, 3 times daily for 10 to 21 days), amoxicillin, and tetracycline have been used. Do not use steroids.
    a) A Lyme disease vaccine is now available for dogs (Prod Info, 1992).
    B) RUMINANTS/HORSES/SWINE
    1) ANAPHYLAXIS -
    a) AIRWAY - Maintain a patent airway via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy.
    b) FLUIDS -
    1) HORSES - Administer electrolyte and fluid therapy as needed. Maintenance dose of intravenous isotonic fluids: 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram per day. High dose for shock: 20 to 45 milliliters/kilogram/hour.
    a) Monitor for packed cell volume, adequate urine output and pulmonary edema. Goal is to maintain a urinary flow of 0.1 milliliters/kilogram/minute (2.4 liters/hour) for an 880 pound horse.
    2) CATTLE - Administer electrolyte and fluid therapy, orally or parenterally as needed. Maintenance dose of intravenous isotonic fluids for calves and debilitated adult cattle: 140 milliliters/kilogram/day. Dose for rehydration: 50 to 100 milliliters/kilogram given over 4 to 6 hours.
    c) EPINEPHRINE -
    1) HORSES - 3 to 5 milliliters/450 kilograms of 1:1000 epinephrine intramuscularly or subcutaneously.
    2) CATTLE & SWINE - 0.02 TO 0.03 milligrams/kilogram of 1:1000 epinephrine subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or intravenously.
    2) LYME DISEASE - Oxytetracycline (5 to 10 milligrams/kilogram twice daily intravenously) and ampicillin sodium (10 to 50 milligrams/kilogram intravenously, three times daily) may be used. Tetracycline is NOT recommended for use in horses (Robinson, 1987). Do not use steroids.

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Remove the patient and other animals from the tick infested area.
    2) Treatment should always be done on the advice and with the consultation of a veterinarian.
    3) Additional information regarding treatment of poisoned animals may be obtained from a Board Certified (ABVT) Veterinary Toxicologist (check with nearest veterinary school or veterinary diagnostic laboratory) or the National Animal Poison Control Center.
    4) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) Remove the offending tick if it is still on the animal. If none can be found, consider an insecticidal dip, especially with large animals, to remove ticks.

General Bibliography

    1) APA Comm Infect Dis: Treatment of Lyme borreliosis. Pediatrics 1991; 88:176-179.
    2) Agger W, Case KL, & Bryant GL: Lyme disease: clinical features, classification, and epidemiology in the upper Midwest. Medicine 1991; 30:83-90.
    3) Agger WA: Isolating Borrelia burgdorferi from erythema migrans (letter). Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:953-954.
    4) Agre F & Schwartz R: The value of early treatment of deer tick bites for the prevention of Lyme disease. Am J Dis Child 1991; 147:945-947.
    5) Albrecht S, Hofstaedter S, & Artsob H: Lymphadenosis benigna cutis resulting from Borrelia infection (Borrelia lymphocytoma). J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 24:621-625.
    6) Am Coll Physicians: Guidelines for laboratory evaluation in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:1106-1108.
    7) Anda P, Rodriguez I, & de la Loma A: A serological survey and review of clinical Lyme borreliosis in Spain. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16:310-309.
    8) Appel MJG, Allan S, & Jacobson RH: Experimental Lyme disease in dogs produces arthritis and persistent infection. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:651-664.
    9) Artigao R, Torres G, & Guerrero A: Irreversible complete heart block in Lyme disease. Am J Med 1991; 90:531-533.
    10) Asbrink E: Cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis: clinical definitions and differential diagnoses. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 77(Suppl):44-50.
    11) Asch ES, Bujak DI, & Weinstein: Long-term clinical outcomes of Lyme disease (letter). Ann Intern Med 1995; 122:961.
    12) Asch ES, Bujak DI, & Weiss: Lyme disease: an infectious and postinfectious syndrome. J Rheumatol 1994; 21:454-461.
    13) Azulay RD, Azulay-Abulafia L, & Sodre CT: Lyme disease in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Dermatol 1991; 30:569-571.
    14) Bachman DT & Srivastava G: Emergency department presentations of Lyme disease in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14:356-361.
    15) Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, & Mead PS: Surveillance for Lyme disease--United States, 1992-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008; 57(10):1-9.
    16) Ballard HS, Bottino G, & Bottino J: The association of thrombocytopaenia and Lyme disease. Postgrad Med J 1994; 70:285-287.
    17) Barbour AG, Heiland RA, & Nowe TR: Heterogeneity of major proteins in Lyme disease Borreliae: a molecular analysis of North American and European isolates. J Infect Dis 1985; 152:478-484.
    18) Barbour AG: Does Lyme disease occur in the South?: a survey of emerging tick-borne infections in the region. Am J Med Sci 1996; 311:34-40.
    19) Barbour AG: Expert advice and patient expectations: laboratory testing and antibiotics for Lyme disease (editorial). JAMA 1998; 279:239-240.
    20) Barthold SW: Globalisation of Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 1996; 348:1603-1604.
    21) Benach JL, Bosler EM, & Hanrahan JP: Spirochetes isolated from the blood of two patients with Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:740-742.
    22) Berger BW: Dermatologic manifestations of Lyme disease. Rev Infect Dis 1989; 2(Suppl):S1475-S1481.
    23) Berglund J, Eitrem R, & Norrby SR: Long-term study of Lyme borreliosis in a highly endemic area in Sweden.. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28:473-478.
    24) Berglund J, Eitrem R, Ornstein K, et al: An epidemiologic study of Lyme disease in southern Sweden.. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1319-1324.
    25) Bertuch AW, Rocco E, & Schwartz EG: Lyme disease: ocular manifestations. Ann Ophthalmol 1988; 20:376-378.
    26) Bjerkhoel A, Carlsson M, & Ohlsson J: Peripheral facial palsy caused by the Borrelia spirochete. Acta Otolaryngol 1989; 108:424-430.
    27) Blaauw AAM & van der Linden S: Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease (letter). Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:423.
    28) Bowen GS & Griffin M: Clinical manifestations and descriptive epidemiology of Lyme disease in New Jersey, 1978 to 1982. JAMA 1984; 251:2236-2240.
    29) Bradley JF, Johnson RC, & Goodman JL: The persistence of spirochetal nucleic acids in active Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:487-489.
    30) Broderick JP, Sandok BA, & Mertz LE: Focal encephalitis in a young woman 6 years after the onset of Lyme disease: tertiary Lyme disease?. Mayo Clin Proc 1987; 62:313-316.
    31) Brogan GX, Homan CS, & Viccellio P: The enlarging clinical spectrum of Lyme disease: Lyme cerebral vasculitis, a new disease entity. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:572-576.
    32) Brown SL, Hansen SL, & Langone JJ: Role of serology in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA 1999; 282:62-66.
    33) Bujak DI, Weinstein A, & Dornbush RL: Clinical and neurocognitive features of the post Lyme syndrome. J Rheumatol 1996; 23:1392-1397.
    34) Burdge DR & O'Hanlon DP: Experience at a referral center for patients with suspected Lyme disease in an area of nonendemicity: first 65 patients. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 16:558-560.
    35) Burgdorfer W & Kierans JE: Ticks and Lyme disease in the US (editorial). Ann Intern Med 1983; 99:121.
    36) CDC: Lyme disease surveillance - United States, 1989-1990. CDC: MMWR 1991; 40:417-421.
    37) CDC: Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease. CDC: MMWR 1995a; 44:590-592.
    38) CDC: Recommendations for the use of Lyme disease vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). CDC: MMWR 1999; 48 (RR-7):1-24.
    39) CDC: Summary of notifiable diseases, United States. CDC: MMWR 1992; 41.
    40) CDC: Ten leading nationally notifiable infections diseases - United States, 1995. CDC: MMWR 1996; 45:883-884.
    41) CDC: Update: Lyme disease and cases occurring during pregnancy - United States. CDC: MMWR 1985; 34:376-384.
    42) Caliendo MV, Kushon DJ, & Helz JW: Delirium and Lyme disease. Psychosomatics 1995; 36:69-74.
    43) Caruso VG: Facial paralysis from Lyme disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93:550-553.
    44) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Lyme Disease: Two-step Laboratory Testing Process. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Atlanta, GA. 2011. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/diagnosistesting/LabTest/TwoStep/index.html. As accessed 2014-10-06.
    45) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Tickborne diseases of the United States: a reference manual for health care providers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. 2014. Available from URL: www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/Tickbornediseases.pdf. As accessed 2014-09-18.
    46) Chancellor MB, McGinnis DE, & Shenot PJ: Urinary dysfunction in Lyme disease. J Urol 1993; 149:26-30.
    47) Chehrenama M, Zagardo MT, & Koski CL: Subarachnoid hemorrhage in a patient with Lyme disease. Neurology 1997; 48:520-523.
    48) Chengxu A, Yuxin W, & Yongguo Z: Clinical manifestations and epidemiological characteristics of Lyme disease in Hailin County, Heilongjiang Province, China. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 539:302-313.
    49) Cimmino MA, Moggiana GL, & Parisi M: Treatment of Lyme arthritis. Infection 1996; 24:91-94.
    50) Cimmino MA: On behalf of the European Community Conceted Action on Risk Assessment in Lyme Borreliosis: Relative frequency of Lyme borreliosis and its clinical manifestations in Europe. Infection 1998; 26:298-300.
    51) Clark JR, Carlson RD, & Sasaki CT: Facial paralysis in Lyme disease. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:1341-1345.
    52) Clesham GJ, Grant A, & Waller D: Reversible heart block in Lyme disease. Br J Clin Pract 1994; 48:271.
    53) Copeland RA Jr: Lyme uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1990; 30:291-293.
    54) Coyle PK: Neurologic complications of Lyme disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1993; 19:993-1009.
    55) Cristofaro RL, Appel MH, & Gelb RI: Musculoskeletal manifestations of Lyme disease in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1987; 7:527-530.
    56) Dekonenko EJ, Steere AC, Berardi VP, et al: Lyme borreliosis in the Soviet Union: a cooperative US-USSR report.. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:748-753.
    57) Dinerman H & Steere AC: Lyme disease associated with fibromyalgia. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117:281-285.
    58) Dressler F: Lyme borreliosis in European children and adolescents. Clin Exper Rheumatol 1994; 12(Suppl 10):S49-S54.
    59) Edlow JA: Lyme disease and related tick-borne illnesses. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33:680-693.
    60) Egherman WP & Rahn DW: Lyme disease; unmasking the great masquerader. Prim Care Rep 1989; 5:49-56.
    61) Eichenfield AH, Goldsmith DP, & Benach JL: Childhood Lyme arthritis: experience in an endemic area. J Pediatr 1986; 109:753-758.
    62) Evans J: Lyme carditis. In: Rahn DW & Evans J (Eds): Lyme Disease. Am Coll Physicians 1998.
    63) Falco RC & Fish D: Potential for exposure to tick bites in recreational parks in a Lyme disease endemic area. Am J Publ Health 1989; 79:12-15.
    64) Falco RC & Fish D: Ticks parasitizing humans in a Lyme disease endemic area of southern state. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:1146-1152.
    65) Falco RC, Fish D, & Piesman J: Duration of tick bites in a Lyme disease-endemic area. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143:187-192.
    66) Farris BK & Webb RM: Lyme disease and optic neuritis. J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 1988; 8:73-78.
    67) Faul JL, Doyle RL, & Kao PN: Tick-borne pulmonary disease: update on diagnosis and management. Chest 1999; 116:222-230.
    68) Feder HM Jr & Hunt MS: Pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in children. JAMA 1995; 274:66-68.
    69) Feder HM Jr, Zalneraitis EL, & Reik L Jr: Lyme disease: acute focal meningoencephalitis in a child. Pediatrics 1988; 82:931-934.
    70) Finkel MF: Lyme disease and its neurologic complications. Arch Neurol 1988; 45:99-104.
    71) Fish D: Environmental risk and prevention of Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):2S-9S.
    72) Fix AD, Pena CA, & Strickland GT: Racial differences in reported Lyme disease incidence. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152:756-759.
    73) Fix AD, Strickland GT, & Grant J: Tick bites and Lyme disease in an endemic setting: problematic use of serologic testing and prophylactic antibiotic therapy. JAMA 1998; 279:206-210.
    74) Flach AJ & Lavoie PE: Episcleritis, conjunctivitis, and keratitis as ocular manifestations of Lyme disease. Ophthalmology 1990; 97:973-975.
    75) Forrester JD & Mead P : Third-degree heart block associated with lyme carditis: review of published cases. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59(7):996-1000.
    76) Gasser R, Dusleag J, & Reisinger E: A most unusual case of a whole family suffering from late lyme borreliosis for over 20 years (letter). Angiology 1994; 45:85-86.
    77) Gaudino EA, Coyle PK, & Krupp LB: Post-Lyme syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: neuropsychiatric similarities and differences. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:1372-1376.
    78) Gautier C, Vignolly B, & Taib A: Benign cutaneous lymphocytoma of the breast areola and erythema chronicum migrans: an association pathognomonic of Lyme disease. Arch Pediatr 1995; 2:343-346.
    79) Gerber MA & Zalneraitis EL: Childhood neurologic disorders and Lyme disease during pregnancy. Pediatr Neurol 1994a; 11:41-43.
    80) Gerber MA, Shapiro ED, & Burke GS: Lyme disease in children in southeastern Connecticut. N Engl J Med 1996a; 335:1270-1274.
    81) Gerber MA, Shapiro ED, & Krause PJ: The risk of acquiring Lyme disease or babesiosis from a blood transfusion. J Infect Dis 1994; 170:231-234.
    82) Gerber MA, Shapiro ED, Burke GS, et al: Lyme disease in children in southeastern Connecticut.. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1270-1274.
    83) Goldberg NS, Forseter G, & Nadelman RB: Vesicular erythema migrans. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128:1495-1498.
    84) Granter SR, Barnhill RL, & Duray PH: Borrelial fasciitis: diffuse fasciitis and peripheral eosinophilia associated with Borrelia infection. Am J Dermatopathol 1996; 18:465-473.
    85) Greene RT: Canine lyme borreliosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1991; 21:51-64.
    86) Gunthard HF, Peter O, & Gubler J: Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in a patient with early Lyme borreliosis. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22:1119-1120.
    87) Gustafson R, Svenungsson B, & Forsgren M: Two-year survey of the incidence of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis in a high-risk population in Sweden. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11:894-900.
    88) Gustafson R, Svenungsson B, & Unosson-Hallnas K: Optic neuropathy in Borrelia infection (letter). J Infect 1988; 17:187-188.
    89) Guy E: Epidemiological surveillance for detecting typical Lyme disease. Lancet 1996; 348:141-142.
    90) Halperin JJ, Logigian EL, & Finkel MF: Practice parameters for the diagnosis of patients with nervous system Lyme borreliosis (Lyme disease). Neurology 1996; 46:619-627.
    91) Hanner P, Rosenhall U, Edstrom S, et al: Hearing impairment in patients with antibody production against Borrelia burgdorferi antigen.. Lancet 1989; 1:13-15.
    92) Hilton E, Smith C, & Sood S: Ocular Lyme borreliosis diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction on vitreous fluid (letter).. Ann Intern Med 1996a; 125:424-425.
    93) Honig PJ: Arthropod bites, stings, and infestations: their prevention and treatment. Pediatr Dermatol 1986; 3:189-197.
    94) Horowitz HW, Dworkin B, & Forseter G: Liver function in early Lyme disease. Hepatology 1996; 23:1412-1417.
    95) Horowitz HW, Sanghera K, & Goldberg N: Dermatomyositis associated with Lyme disease: case report and review of Lyme myositis. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 18:166-171.
    96) Hsu VM, Patella SJ, & Sigal LH: "Chronic Lyme disease" as the incorrect diagnosis in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36:1493-1500.
    97) Huaux JP, Bigaignon G, & Stadtsbaeder S: Pattern of Lyme arthritis in Europe: report of 14 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 1988; 47:164-165.
    98) Hudson BJ, Stewart M, Lennox VA, et al: Culture-positive Lyme borreliosis.. Med J Aust 1998; 168:500-502.
    99) Huff JS, Syverud SA, & Tucci MA: Case conference: complete heart block in a young man. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2:751-756.
    100) Huppertz HI & Sticht-Groh V: Meningitis due to Borrelia burgdorferi in the initial stage of Lyme disease. Eur J Pediatr 1989; 148:428-430.
    101) Huppertz HI, Munchmeier D, & Lieb W: Ocular manifestations in children and adolescents with Lyme arthritis. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83:1149-1152.
    102) Huppertz HI, Schmidt H, & Karch H: Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi by nested polymerase chain reaction in cerebrospinal fluid and urine of children with neuroborreliosis. Eur J Pediatr 1993; 152:414-417.
    103) Ilowite NT: Muscle, reticuloendothelial, and late skin manifestations of Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):63S-68S.
    104) Kaiser R: Variable CSF findings in early and late Lyme neuroborreliosis: a follow-up study in 47 patients. J Neurol 1994; 242:26-36.
    105) Karma A, Seppala I, & Mikkila H: Diagnosis and clinical characteristics of ocular Lyme borreliosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 119:127-135.
    106) Kauffman DJ & Wormser GP: Ocular Lyme disease: case report and review of the literature. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74:325-327.
    107) Kauffmann DJ & Wormser GP: Ocular Lyme disease: case report and review of the literature.. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74:325-327.
    108) Kaufman LD, Gruber BL, Phillips ME, et al: Late cutaneous Lyme disease: acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans.. Am J Med 1989; 86:828-830.
    109) Kazakoff MA, Sinusas K, & Macchia C: Liver function test abnormalities in early Lyme disease. Arch Fam Med 1993; 2:409-413.
    110) Keller TL, Halperin JJ, & Whitman M: PCR detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme neuroborreliosis patients. Neurology 1992; 42:32-42.
    111) Kimball SA, Janson PA, & LaRaia PJ: Complete heart block as the sole presentation of Lyme disease. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149:1897-1898.
    112) Kirkland KB, Klimko TB, & Meriwether RA: Erythema migrans-like rash illness at a camp in North Carolina: a new tick-borne disease?. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:2635-2641.
    113) Kirsch M, Ruben RL, & Steere AC: Fatal adult respiratory distress syndrome in a patient with Lyme disease. JAMA 1988; 259:2737-2739.
    114) Kishaba RG, Weinhouse E, & Chusid MJ: Lyme disease presenting as heart block. Clin Pediatr 1988; 27:291-293.
    115) Klein JD, Eppes SC, & Hunt P: Environmental and life-style risk factors for Lyme disease in children. Clin Pediatr 1996; 35:359-363.
    116) Kornblatt AN, Urband PH, & Steele AC: J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 186:960.
    117) Kruger WH & Pulz M: Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in cerebrospinal fluid by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol 1991; 35:98-102.
    118) Kuiper H, de Jongh BM, van Dam AP, et al: Evaluation of central nervous system involvement in Lyme borreliosis patients with a solitary erythema migrans lesion.. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13:379-387.
    119) Lakos A: CSF findings in Lyme meningitis. J Infect 1992; 25:155-161.
    120) Lane RS, Manweiler SA, & Stubbs HA: Risk factors for Lyme disease in a small rural community in northern California. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136:1358-1368.
    121) Lastavica CC, Wilson ML, Berardi VP, et al: Rapid emergence of a focal epidemic of Lyme disease in coastal Massachusetts.. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:133-137.
    122) Lawson JP & Steere AC: Lyme arthritis: radiologic findings. Radiology 1985; 154:37-43.
    123) Lee MD, Sonenshine DE, & Counselman FL: Evaluation of subcutaneous injection of local anesthetic agents as a method of tick removal. Amer J Emerg Med 1995; 13:14-16.
    124) Lesser RL: Ocular manifestations of Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):60S-62S.
    125) Levine JF, Apperson CS, & Spiegel RA: Indigenous cases of Lyme disease diagnosed in North Carolina. South Med J 1991; 84:27-31.
    126) Levy SA & Duray PH: Complete heart block in a dog seropositive for Borrelia burgdroferi. J Vet Intern Med 1988; 2:138-144.
    127) Ley C, Davila IH, & Mayer NM: Lyme disease in northwestern coastal California. West J Med 1994; 160:534-539.
    128) Liegner KB & Kochevar J: Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of lyme disease (letter). Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:422.
    129) Logigian EL, Kaplan RF, & Steere AC: Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1438-1444.
    130) Luft BJ, Bosler EM, & Dattwyler RJ: Lyme borreliosis. Intl J Antimicrobial Agents 1994; 3:251-258.
    131) Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, & Barbour AG: The etiologic agent of Lyme disease in deer flies, horse flies, and mosquitoes. J Infect Dis 1986; 154:355-358.
    132) Magnarelli LA, Anderson JF, & Schreier AB: J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191:1089.
    133) Magnarelli LA: Current status of laboratory diagnosis for Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):10S-14S.
    134) Malane MS, Grant-Kels JM, & Feder HM Jr: Diagnosis of Lyme disease based on dermatologic manifestations. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:490-498.
    135) Mario-Ubaldo M: Cerebellitis associated with Lyme disease (letter). Lancet 1995; 345:1060.
    136) Markby DP: Lyme disease facial palsy: differentiation from Bell's palsy. Br Med J 1989; 299:605-606.
    137) Masters EJ & Donnell HD: Epidemiologic and diagnostic studies of patients with suspected early Lyme disease, Missouri, 1990-1993 (letter). J Infect Dis 1996; 173:1527-1528.
    138) Matteson EL, Beckett VL, & O'Fallon: Epidemiology of Lyme disease in Olmsted County, MN, 1975-1990. J Rheumatol 1992; 19:1743-1745.
    139) Matuschka FR, Endepols S, & Richter D: Risk of urban Lyme disease enhanced by the presence of rats. J Infect Dis 1996; 174:1108-1111.
    140) May C, Bennett D, & Carter SD: Lyme disease in the dog. Vet Rec 1990; 126:293.
    141) McAllister HF, Klementowicz PT, & Andrews C: Lyme carditis: an important cause of reversible heart block. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110:339-345.
    142) McCaulley M: Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease (letter). Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:422-423.
    143) McGowan JE Jr, Chesney PJ, & Crossley KB: Guidelines for the use of systemic glucocorticosteroids in the management of selected infections. J Infect Dis 1992; 165:1-13.
    144) Melski JW, Reed KD, & Mitchell PD: Primary and secondary erythema migrans in central Wisconsin. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129:709-716.
    145) Mertz LE, Wobig GH, & Duffy J: Ticks, spirochetes, and new diagnostic tests for Lyme disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1985; 60:402-406.
    146) Modly CE & Burnett JW: Tick-borne dermatologic diseases. Cutis 1988; 41:244-246.
    147) Moscatello AL, Worden DL, & Nadelman RB: Otolarygologic aspects of Lyme disease. Laryngoscope 1991; 101:592-595.
    148) Nadelman RB & Wormser GP: Erythema migrans and early Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98(Suppl 4A):15S-24S.
    149) Nadelman RB & Wormser GP: Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 1998; 352:557-565.
    150) Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, & Forseter G: The clinical spectrum of early Lyme borreliosis in patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans. Am J Med 1996; 100:502-508.
    151) Nash PT: Does Lyme disease exist in Australia (editorial)?. MJA 1998; 168:479-480.
    152) Needham GR: Evaluation of five popular methods for tick removal. Pediatrics 1985; 75:997-1002.
    153) O'Connell S: Lyme disease in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1995; 310:303-308.
    154) Oksi J, Mertsola J, & Reunanen M: Subacute multiple-site osteomyelitis caused by Borrelia burgdorferi. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19:891-896.
    155) Olson LJ, Okafor EC, & Clements IP: Cardiac involvement in Lyme disease: manifestations and management. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61:745-749.
    156) Pachner AR & Delaney E: The polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis. Ann Neurol 1993; 34:544-550.
    157) Pachner AR & Steere AC: The triad of neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease: meningitis, cranial neuritis, and radiculoneuritis. Neurology 1985; 35:47-53.
    158) Pachner AR: Early disseminated Lyme disease: Lyme meningitis. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):30S-43S.
    159) Patmas MA: Lyme disease: the evolution of erythema chronicum migrans into acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Cutis 1993; 52:169-170.
    160) Peltomaa M, Pyykko I, & Seppala I: Lyme borreliosis, an etiological factor in sensorineural hearing loss?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 257:317-322.
    161) Petersen BB, Moller JK, & Vilholm OJ: Season is an unreliable predictor of Lyme neuroborreliosis. Dan Med J 2015; 62(6):A5084.
    162) Pohl-Koppe A, Wilske B, & Weiss M: Borrelia lymphocytoma in childhood. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:423-426.
    163) Rahn DW & Malawista SE: Lyme disease: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:472-481.
    164) Reid MC, Schoen RT, & Evans J: The consequences of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Lyme disease: an observational study. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:354-362.
    165) Reik L Jr, Burgdorfer W, & Donaldson JO: Neurologic abnormalities in Lyme disease without erythema chronicum migrans. Am J Med 1986; 81:73-78.
    166) Reik L Jr, Steere AC, & Bartenhagen NH: Neurologic abnormalities of Lyme disease. Medicine 1979; 58:281-294.
    167) Reilly M & Hutchinson M: Neurological presentation of lyme disease in Ireland: a review of six cases. Irish Neurological Assoc, 1990.
    168) Reznick JW, Braunstein DB, & Walsh RL: Lyme carditis: electrophysiologic and histopathologic study. Am J Med 1986; 81:923-927.
    169) Rosa PA & Schwan TG: A specific and sensitive assay for the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi using the polymerse chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1989; 160:1018-1029.
    170) Rosenfeld ME, Beckerman B, & Ward MF: Lyme carditis: complete AV dissociation with episodic asystole presenting as syncope in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 1999; 17:661-664.
    171) Schechter SL: Lyme disease assciated with optic neuropathy. Am J Med 1986; 81:143-145.
    172) Schned ES & Williams DN: Lyme disease: the tick bite, the rash, and the sequelae. Postgrad Med 1985; 77:303-310.
    173) Schwartz BS & Goldstein MD: Lyme disease in outdoor workers: risk factors, preventive measures, and tick removal methods. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131:877-885.
    174) Schwartz BS, Goldstein MD, & Childs JE: Longitudinal study of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in New Jersey outdoor workers, 1988-1991. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139:504-512.
    175) Shadick NA, Phillips CB, & Logigian EL: The long-term clinical outcomes of Lyme disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:560-567.
    176) Shapiro ED: Lyme disease in children. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):69S-73S.
    177) Shrestha M, Grodzicki RL, & Steere AC: Diagnosing early Lyme disease. Am J Med 1985; 78:235-240.
    178) Sigal LH: Current recommendations for the treatment of Lyme disease. Drugs 1992; 43:683-699.
    179) Sigal LH: Early disseminated Lyme disease: cardiac manifestations. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):25S-29S.
    180) Sigal LH: Lyme disease overdiagnosis: causes and cure (editorial). Hosp Pract 1996; 31:13-28.
    181) Sigal LH: Lyme disease, 1988: immunologic manifestations and possible immunopathogenetic mechanisms. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 18:151-167.
    182) Sigal LH: Persisting symptoms of Lyme disease - possible explanations and implications for treatment (editorial). J Rheumatol 1994; 21:593.
    183) Sigal LH: Pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41:195-204.
    184) Sigal LH: The Lyme disease controversy: social and financial costs of misdiagnosis and mismanagement. Arch Intern Med 1996a; 156:1493-1500.
    185) Sigal LH: The polymerase chain reaction assay for Borrelia burgdorferi in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1994b; 120:520.
    186) Smouha EE, Coyle PK, & Shukri S: Facial nerve palsy in Lyme disease: evaluation of clinical dignostic criteria. Am J Otol 1997; 18:257-261.
    187) Sood SK: Lyme disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18:913-925.
    188) Spach DH, Liles WC, & Campbell GL: Tick-borne diseases in the United States. NEJM 1993; 329:936-947.
    189) Stanek G , Fingerle V , Hunfeld KP , et al: Lyme borreliosis: clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17(1):69-79.
    190) Steere AC, Batsford WP, & Weinberg M: Lyme carditis: cardiac abnormalities of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1980b; 93:8-16.
    191) Steere AC, Broderick TF, & Malawista SE: Erythema chronicum migrans and Lyme arthritis: epidemiologic evidence of a tick vector. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108:312-321.
    192) Steere AC, Duray PH, & Kauffmann DJH: Unilateral blindness caused by infection with the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Ann Intern Med 1985a; 103:382-384.
    193) Steere AC, Gibofsky A, & Patarroyo ME: Chronic Lyme arthritis: clinical and immunogenetic differentiation from rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1979a; 90:896-901.
    194) Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, & Kornblatt AN: The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1983ba; 308:733-740.
    195) Steere AC, Malawista SE, & Hardin JA: Erythema chronicum migrans and Lyme arthritis: the enlarging clinical spectrum. Ann Intern Med 1977a; 86:685-698.
    196) Steere AC, Malawista SE, & Snydman DR: Lyme arthritis: an epidemic of oligoarticular arthritis in children and adults in three Connecticut communities. Arthritis Rheum 1977b; 20:7-17.
    197) Steere AC, Nichols H, & Bartenhagen MD: The early clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1983a; 99:76-82.
    198) Steere AC, Nichols H, Bartenhagen MD, et al: The early clinical manifestations of Lyme disease.. Ann Intern Med 1983aa; 99:76-82.
    199) Steere AC, Nocols H, & Barthenhagen MD: The early clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1983ab; 99:76-82.
    200) Steere AC, Pachner AR, & Malawista SE: Neurologic abnormalities of Lyme disease: successful treatment with high-dose intravenous penicillin. Ann Intern Med 1983b; 99:767-772.
    201) Steere AC, Schoen RT, & Taylor E: The clinical evolution of Lyme arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107:725-731.
    202) Steere AC, Taylor E, McHugh GL, et al: The overdiagnosis of Lyme disease.. JAMA 1993; 269:1812-1816.
    203) Steere AC: Current understanding of Lyme disease. Hosp Pract 1993a; 28:37-44.
    204) Steere AC: Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 1989; 321:586-596.
    205) Steere AC: Musculoskeletal features of Lyme disease. In: Rahn DW & Evans J (Eds): Lyme Disease. Am Coll Physicians 1998.
    206) Steere AC: Musculoskeletal manifestations of Lyme disease. Am J Med 1995; 98 (suppl 4A):44S-48S.
    207) Steinberg SH, Strickland GT, & Pena C: Lyme disease surveillance in Maryland, 1992. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6:24-29.
    208) Sternbach G & Dibble CL: Willy Burgdorfer: Lyme disease. J Emerg Med 1996; 14:631-634.
    209) Strle F & Stantic-Pavlinic M: Lyme disease in Europe (letter). N Engl J Med 1996; 334:803.
    210) Strle F, Maraspin V, & Pleterski-Rigler D: Treatment of borrelial lymphocytoma. Infection 1996c; 24:80-84.
    211) Strle F, Pleterski-Rigler D, & Stanek G: Solitary borrelial lymphocytoma: report of 36 cases. Infection 1992; 20:201-206.
    212) Szer IS, Taylor E, & Steere AC: The long-term course of Lyme arthritis in children. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:159-163.
    213) Tugwell P, Dennis DT, & Weinstein A: Laboratory evaluation in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:1109-1123.
    214) Tugwell P, Steere A, & Weinstein A: Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease (letter). Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:423.
    215) Tumani H, Nolker G, & Reiber H: Relevance of cerebrospinal fluid variables for early diagnosis of neuroborreliosis. Neurology 1995; 45:1663-1670.
    216) Underwood PK & Armour VM: Cases of Lyme disease reported in a military community. Milit Med 1993; 158:116-119.
    217) Vlay SC, Dervan JP, & Elias J: Ventricular tachycardia associated with Lyme carditis. Am Heart J 1991; 121:1558-1560.
    218) Vlay SC: Complete heart block due to Lyme disease (letter). N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1418.
    219) Weissman K, Jagminas L, & Shapiro MJ: Frightening dreams and spells: a case of ventricular asystole from Lyme disease. Eur J Emerg Med 1999; 6:397-401.
    220) Williams CL, Strobino B, & Lee A: Lyme disease in childhood: clinical and epidemiologic features of ninety cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:10-14.
    221) Williams D & Rolles CJ: Lyme disease in a Hampshire child: medical curiosity or beginning of an epidemic?. Br Med J 1986; 292:1560-1561.
    222) Winward KE & Smith JL: Ocular disease in Caribbean patients with serologic evidence of Lyme borreliosis. J Clin Neuro Ophthalmol 1989; 9:65-70.
    223) Woolf PK, Lorsung EM, & Edwards KS: Electrocardiographic findings in children with Lyme disease. Pediatr Emerg Care 1991; 7:334-336.
    224) Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, et al: The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43(9):1089-1134.
    225) Wormser GP, McKenna D, & Nadelman RB: Lyme disease in children (letter). N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1107.
    226) Yan-Ming L, Bennett CE, White JE, et al: Lyme disease in the United Kingdom: an ELISA study of dog sera with antigen comparison between the American B31 strain and a British IWG strain.. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 539:465-4487.
    227) de Koning J, Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA, & van der Linde MR: Demonstration of spirochetes in cardiac biopsies of patients with Lyme disease. J Infect Dis 1989; 160:150-153.
    228) van der Linde MR: Lyme carditis: clinical characteristics of 105 cases. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 77(suppl):81-84.