MOBILE VIEW  | 

ALKOXYSILANES

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Alkoxysilanes are the basic raw materials used in the manufacture of silicone compounds. Compounds may be conveniently grouped into those that produce methanol and those that do not.

Specific Substances

    A) SYNONYMS FOR THE GROUP
    1) Alkyl silicon esters
    2) Silanates
    3) Silanol esters
    4) EXTREMA (CAS 78-10-4)
    5) METHYL ORTHO-SILICATE
    6) SILANAL ESTERS
    METHANOL PRODUCERS
    1) dimethyldimethoxysilane
    2) isobutyltrimethoxysilane
    3) methyltrimethoxysilane
    4) phenyltrimethoxysilane
    5) propyltrimethoxysilane
    6) tetramethoxysilane (methyl silicate)
    7) vinyltrimethoxysilane
    NON-METHANOL PRODUCERS
    1) acetoxysilane
    2) amyltriethoxysilane (CAS 2761-24-2)
    3) diethoxydimethylsilane
    4) dimethyldiethoxysilane (CAS 78-62-6)
    5) ethoxytrimethylsilane
    6) glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (silicon tetrahydride)
    7) methyltriethoxysilane
    8) trimethylethoxysilane
    9) vinyltriethoxysilane (CAS 78-08-0)

Available Forms Sources

    A) USES
    1) Alkoxysilanes are used in the manufacture of silicone compounds. They are silanol esters which represent the basic raw materials used for commercial production of silicones (Bisesi, 1994).
    2) Tetramethylsilane is used as an aviation fuel and an analytical standard (AAR, 1987).
    3) Silicone tetrahydride (silane) is a source of pure silicon for use in semiconductors (Budavari, 1996).
    4) Dimethyldiethoxysilane is a liquid at room temperature. It has been mixed with glycerol and applied in the rabbit as a model for prevention of arterial wall and metabolic disorders (Bisesi, 1994).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Alkoxysilanes are the basic raw materials used in the manufacture of silicone compounds. They can be divided into those that produce methanol and those that do not. Tetramethylsilane is used as an aviation fuel and an analytic standard. Silicone tetrahydride is a source for pure silicon for use in semiconductors.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Alkoxysilanes are irritating to the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes. Methoxy derivatives liberate methanol in the presence of water or acids. This can lead to methanol toxicity via the formation of formaldehyde and formic acid.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Workers in certain industries (eg, workers in fiberglass manufacturing facilities) may be commonly exposed to alkoxysilanes but severe manifestations are extremely rare.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Alkoxysilanes are irritating to eyes, skin, and mucous membranes. Respiratory irritation may also be seen. Amyl, vinyl, and glycidoxy derivatives are the least toxic. Following exposures to vapors, conjunctivitis, slight anesthesia, and headaches have all been reported.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Methoxy derivatives liberate methanol upon reacting with water or acids. Refer to the METHANOL management regarding further information about toxic effects (eg, acidosis, seizures). Severe ocular burns and blindness have been reported with tetramethoxysilane and trimethoxysilane.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) No embryotoxic or teratogenic effects were found in rat studies.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor electrolytes, renal function, blood gases, ECG, vital signs, and mental status in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.
    B) Obtain a chest X-ray in patients with significant respiratory symptoms.
    C) Obtain both methanol and ethanol blood levels. Determine plasma osmolarity (using freezing point depression) if methanol level is not readily available. Methanol, like ethanol, will cause an osmolar gap.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Methanol toxicity may occur in patients with significant exposure to methoxy derivatives. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur. Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with IV sodium bicarbonate. Ethanol or fomepizole may be give in patients where there is a concern for significant methanol toxicity. In addition, folic acid or leucovorin can be given to help encourage metabolism of formic acid to carbon dioxide and water.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and is able to maintain their airway.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and is able to maintain their airway.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Though patients may present with respiratory difficulty after inhalational exposures, advanced airway management is extremely unlikely to be an issue.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) Methanol toxicity may occur in patients with significant exposure to a methoxy derivative alkoxysilane. For suspected methanol toxicity, treat patients with either fomepizole or ethanol to prevent the production of formate. Indications include documented plasma methanol concentration greater than 20 mg/dL (greater than 200 mg/L) OR documented recent history of ingesting toxic amounts of methanol and osmolal gap greater than 10 mOsm/L OR history OR strong clinical suspicion of methanol poisoning with at least 2 of the following criterion: arterial pH less than 7.3; serum bicarbonate less than 20 mEq/L; osmolal gap greater than 10 mOsm/L.
    a) FOMEPIZOLE VS ETHANOL: Fomepizole is easier to use clinically, requires less monitoring, does not cause CNS depression or hypoglycemia, and may obviate the need for dialysis in some patients. Ethanol requires continuous administration and frequent monitoring of serum ethanol and glucose levels, and may cause CNS depression and hypoglycemia (especially in children). The drug cost associated with ethanol use is generally much lower than with fomepizole; however, other costs associated with ethanol use (eg, continuous intravenous infusion, hourly blood draws and ethanol levels, possible greater use of hemodialysis) may make the costs more comparable.
    b) FOMEPIZOLE: Fomepizole is administered as a 15 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 4 bolus doses of 10 mg/kg every 12 hours. If therapy is needed beyond this 48-hour period, the dose is then increased to 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for as long as necessary. Fomepizole is also effectively removed by hemodialysis; therefore, doses should be repeated following each round of hemodialysis.
    c) ETHANOL: Ethanol is given to maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% to 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line. Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated, followed by an infusion rate of 80 to 150 mg/kg/hr (for 10% ethanol, 0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr for a nondrinker; 1.5 mL/kg/hr for a chronic alcoholic). During hemodialysis, either add ethanol to the dialysate to achieve 100 mg/dL concentration or increase the rate of infusion during dialysis (for 10% ethanol, 2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr). Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentration. The loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (4 mL/kg of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube. Maintenance dose is 80 to 150 mg/kg/hr (of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol; 0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hr for a nondrinker; 0.8 mL/kg/hr for a chronic alcoholic). Concentrations greater than 30% (60 proof) ethanol should be diluted. For both modalities, blood ethanol levels must be monitored hourly and adjusted accordingly, and both require patient monitoring in an ICU setting.
    d) FOLATE: Folate increases the metabolism of formate. Either folic acid or leucovorin (folinic acid) may be used. In symptomatic patients (anion gap acidosis, visual disturbances) and asymptomatic patients with known or suspected methanol intoxication, administer intravenous folic acid 1 to 2 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours for the first 24 hours, and continue until methanol is cleared and acidosis resolves. Folate is removed by hemodialysis so in patients undergoing hemodialysis, administer one dose prior to and another at the completion of hemodialysis.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) Significant methanol toxicity is theoretically possible after exposure to a methoxy derivative alkoxysilane. Patients with significant methanol levels could benefit from dialysis, but there is no role for hemoperfusion, urinary alkalinization, or multiple dose activated charcoal.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic patients or patients with minimal symptoms after an unintentional or occupational exposure that improves with decontamination can remain at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Any patient with a self-harm exposure should be sent to a healthcare facility for observation. Any patient with symptoms that persist or worsen despite standard decontamination should be sent to a healthcare facility for observation until symptoms are stable or clearly improving, at which point they can be discharged.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients who have worsening symptoms and require more advanced treatment than supportive care (eg, ethanol, fomepizole, hemodialysis, etc) should be admitted to the hospital. Patients who require intensive monitoring or airway support should be admitted to the ICU. Patients can be discharged only after they are clearly improving and stable.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear. Consult a nephrologist for patients requiring hemodialysis or an intensivist for patients requiring an intensive care setting.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) When managing patients with suspected alkoxysilane toxicity, being unaware that methoxy derivatives alkoxysilanes have the potential to cause methanol toxicity.
    I) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Methoxy alkoxysilanes may produce methanol toxicity via the formation of formaldehyde and formic acid via the enzymes alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase.
    J) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Other substances that can cause dermal or mucosal membrane irritation upon exposure or respiratory problems upon inhalation can mimic symptoms of alkoxysilanes. Other causes of methanol toxicity (eg, windshield wiper fluid).
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Move patients to fresh air and monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature normal saline or water for at least 15 minutes following ocular exposure. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION
    a) Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags following dermal exposure. Exposed skin can be washed for 10 to 15 minutes with soap and water and gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: A specific toxic dose has not been established. Exposure to tetramethoxysilane vapors at 200 to 300 parts per million (ppm) for 15 minutes is estimated to produce minimal corneal damage and 1000 ppm may cause serious corneal injury.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Alkoxysilanes are the basic raw materials used in the manufacture of silicone compounds. They can be divided into those that produce methanol and those that do not. Tetramethylsilane is used as an aviation fuel and an analytic standard. Silicone tetrahydride is a source for pure silicon for use in semiconductors.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Alkoxysilanes are irritating to the eyes, skin, and mucous membranes. Methoxy derivatives liberate methanol in the presence of water or acids. This can lead to methanol toxicity via the formation of formaldehyde and formic acid.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Workers in certain industries (eg, workers in fiberglass manufacturing facilities) may be commonly exposed to alkoxysilanes but severe manifestations are extremely rare.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Alkoxysilanes are irritating to eyes, skin, and mucous membranes. Respiratory irritation may also be seen. Amyl, vinyl, and glycidoxy derivatives are the least toxic. Following exposures to vapors, conjunctivitis, slight anesthesia, and headaches have all been reported.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Methoxy derivatives liberate methanol upon reacting with water or acids. Refer to the METHANOL management regarding further information about toxic effects (eg, acidosis, seizures). Severe ocular burns and blindness have been reported with tetramethoxysilane and trimethoxysilane.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: Exposure in humans has produced irritation and other ophthalmic problems. Exposure to vapors at 200 to 300 parts per million (ppm) for 15 minutes is estimated to produce minimal corneal damage and 1000 ppm to produce serious injury (ACGIH, 1986).
    1) Industrial exposure has produced eye pain and eye loss. A latency period of 16 to 72 hours may occur prior to development of ophthalmologic changes (ACGIH, 1986).
    B) TRIMETHOXYSILANE: Severe delayed eye irritation (keratitis epithelialis) has been reported in workers; onset was 8 to 12 hours, was maximal in 12 to 24 hours, and lasted 20 to 90 days (Tamura & Yuri, 1968). Loss of corneal epithelium and edema of the cornea (maximum within 12 to 24 hours) occurred in these workers, with complete healing in 20 to 25 days (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    1) Vapors absorbed into corneal tissues may cause blindness (HSDB , 2000).
    C) AMYL TRIMETHOXYSILANE: Mild eye irritation has been reported in animal studies (Smyth et al, 1969).
    D) DIETHOXYDIMETHYLSILANE: Eye irritation has been reported in animal studies (Lewis, 1996).
    E) METHYLTRIETHOXYSILANE: Mild eye irritation has been reported in animal studies (Lewis, 1996).
    F) SILICON TETRACHLORIDE: When introduced experimentally into rabbit eyes, severe ocular damage was seen (Grant & Schuman, 1993; Carpenter & Smyth, 1946; Duke-Elder, 1954).
    G) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: Animal toxicity studies demonstrated severe eye irritation with marked edema and eyelid necrosis following installation of pure compound (Smyth et al, 1951).
    1) Rabbits exposed to 1000 ppm and 15,000 ppm for 5 minutes developed eye burns (ACGIH, 1986). Exposures up to 135 ppm for 15 minutes was tolerated in guinea pigs (ACGIH, 1986).
    H) VINYL TRIMETHOXYSILANE: Mild eye irritation has been reported in animal studies (Smyth et al, 1969).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INJURY OF UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SILICON TRICHLORIDE reacts with water to form hydrochloric acid and silicic acid which are respiratory irritants (Kizer et al, 1984).
    3.6.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IRRITATION
    a) DIETHOXYDIMETHYLSILANE: Exposure to 4000 ppm of diethoxydimethylsilane produced severe respiratory irritation in rats (Rowe et al, 1948).
    b) TETRAETHOXYSILANE: Respiratory tract irritation was noted in rats after exposure to vapors of tetraethoxysilane 250 ppm or greater (Rowe et al, 1948).
    2) PULMONARY EDEMA
    a) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: Pulmonary edema was noted in animals given intravenous tetramethoxysilane (Sax, 1984).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DROWSY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Headache and anesthetic effects may be noted.
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) SOMNOLENCE
    a) TRIMETHYLSILANOL: Transient sedation was noted in rats given trimethylsilanol 20 to 200 mg/kg/day (Isquith et al, 1988a).
    b) TETRAETHOXYSILANE: Animals exposed to vapors of tetraethoxysilane or methyltriethoxysilane developed unsteadiness, tremors, and unconsciousness after single exposures to 1000 to 4000 ppm.
    c) ETHOXYTRIMETHYLSILANE had the most potent narcotic effect but was not irritating (Rowe et al, 1948).
    2) ATAXIA
    a) DIETHOXYDIMETHYLSILANE produced only unsteadiness.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTRIC ULCER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SILICON TETRACHLORIDE: Ingestion is expected to produce irritation to ulceration (Meyer, 1977; Rowe et al, 1948).

Genitourinary

    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RENAL FUNCTION ABNORMAL
    a) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: Renal toxicity has been observed with chronic exposure to vapors of tetramethoxysilane in animals in concentrations as low as 100 ppm (Rowe et al, 1948).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SILICON TETRACHLORIDE: Hemolytic anemia may be seen after exposure (Rowe et al, 1948; Sandmeyer & Kirwin, 1980).

Dermatologic

    3.14.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IRRITATION
    a) DIETHOXYDIMETHYLSILANE: Skin irritation has been reported in animals exposed to diethoxydimethylsilane (Lewis, 1996).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) No embryotoxic or teratogenic effects were found in rat studies.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) GLYCIDOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE - No embryotoxic or teratogenic effects were associated with doses of 50, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day during organogenesis in rats (Siddiqui & Hobbs, 1984).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) SKIN CARCINOMA
    1) MICE - Two methoxysilanes and 2 ethoxysilanes were tested in mice. 10 to 100% concentrations were applied in 25 microliter aliquots 3 times a week for the life of the animals (DePass et al, 1989). The results showed:
    a) EEMS (beta-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl) ethyltriethoxysilane) was oncogenic, producing squamous cell carcinomas.
    b) GPMS (gamma-glycidoxy propyltrimethoxy silane), EEES (beta-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl) ethyltriethoxysilane), and GPES (gamma-glycidoxy propyltriethoxysilane) were not oncogenic.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor electrolytes, renal function, blood gases, ECG, vital signs, and mental status in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.
    B) Obtain a chest X-ray in patients with significant respiratory symptoms.
    C) Obtain both methanol and ethanol blood levels. Determine plasma osmolarity (using freezing point depression) if methanol level is not readily available. Methanol, like ethanol, will cause an osmolar gap.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Monitor electrolytes, renal function, and blood gases in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.
    2) Obtain both methanol and ethanol blood levels. Determine plasma osmolarity (using freezing point depression) if methanol level is not readily available. Methanol, like ethanol, will cause an osmolar gap.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    a) Obtain a chest X-ray in patients with significant respiratory symptoms.
    2) MONITORING
    a) Monitor ECG, vital signs, and mental status in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who have worsening symptoms and require more advanced treatment than supportive care (eg, ethanol, fomepizole, hemodialysis, etc) should be admitted to the hospital. Patients who require intensive monitoring or airway support should be admitted to the ICU. Patients can be discharged only after they are clearly improving and stable.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic patients or patients with minimal symptoms after an unintentional or occupational exposure that improves with decontamination can remain at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear. Consult a nephrologist for patients requiring hemodialysis or an intensivist for patients requiring an intensive care setting.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any patient with a self-harm exposure should be sent to a healthcare facility for observation. Any patient with symptoms that persist or worsen despite standard decontamination should be sent to a healthcare facility for observation until symptoms are stable or clearly improving, at which point they can be discharged.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor electrolytes, renal function, blood gases, ECG, vital signs, and mental status in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.
    B) Obtain a chest X-ray in patients with significant respiratory symptoms.
    C) Obtain both methanol and ethanol blood levels. Determine plasma osmolarity (using freezing point depression) if methanol level is not readily available. Methanol, like ethanol, will cause an osmolar gap.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Methanol toxicity may occur in patients with significant exposure to methoxy derivatives. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur. Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with IV sodium bicarbonate. Ethanol or fomepizole may be give in patients where there is a concern for significant methanol toxicity. In addition, folic acid or leucovorin can be given to help encourage metabolism of formic acid to carbon dioxide and water.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor electrolytes, renal function, blood gases, ECG, vital signs, and mental status in patients with significant exposure to methoxy alkoxysilanes.
    2) Obtain chest X-ray in patients with significant respiratory symptoms.
    3) Obtain both methanol and ethanol blood levels. Determine plasma osmolarity (using freezing point depression) if methanol level is not readily available. Methanol, like ethanol, will cause an osmolar gap.
    C) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    D) ACIDOSIS
    1) Significant acidosis may not develop until 18 to 48 hours following ingestion and should be treated with sodium bicarbonate with close monitoring of arterial blood gases. Severe acidosis may initially be treated with 1 to 2 mEq/kg bicarbonate. Bicarbonate should be titrated to normalize arterial pH.
    2) Monitor arterial blood gas as a guide to assess the severity of intoxication. Severe anion gap metabolic acidosis is common. A pH of less than 7.0 and bicarbonate less than 10 mEq/L are not uncommon following severe intoxication. The onset of acidosis may be delayed for 18 to 48 hours, especially if ethanol has also been ingested. Therefore, THE ABSENCE OF ACIDOSIS DOES NOT RULE OUT A SIGNIFICANT METHANOL INGESTION.
    3) Acidosis may be refractory to treatment, especially if the absorption of methanol is ongoing or if ethanol, fomepizole, or both has not been administered.
    4) Sodium bicarbonate should be administered to correct acidosis (ADULT: 1 to 2 mEq/kg; CHILDREN: 1 to 2 mEq/kg) titrated to correct arterial pH.
    5) In a retrospective series of 32 patients who survived severe methanol intoxication, Liu et al (1998) reported no difference in initial pH and time to dialysis between patients with permanent visual sequelae and those with complete recovery. However, the time to correction of acidosis (initially with intravenous sodium bicarbonate boluses) tended to be longer (mean 5.4 hours) in patients with visual loss than in patients with complete recovery (mean 3.0 hours, p=0.06). When corrected for initial pH, the statistical significance of this finding was reduced (p=0.08). The authors suggest that early correction of pH with intravenous bicarbonate may improve visual outcome, but further studies are needed.
    E) ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE INHIBITOR
    1) The decision as to which antidote to use depends on a number of factors. Fomepizole is easier to use clinically, requires less monitoring, does not cause CNS depression or hypoglycemia, and may obviate the need for dialysis in some patients. Ethanol requires continuous administration and frequent monitoring of serum ethanol and glucose levels, and may cause CNS depression and hypoglycemia (especially in children). The drug cost associated with ethanol use is generally much lower than with fomepizole; however, other costs associated with ethanol use (eg, continuous intravenous infusion, hourly blood draws and ethanol levels, possible greater use of hemodialysis) may make the costs more comparable.
    a) One study recommended that critically ill patients with severe metabolic acidosis (base deficit greater than 15 mmol/L) or visual disturbances should receive sodium bicarbonate, fomepizole, and hemodialysis as soon as possible. Stable patients, with little to moderate metabolic acidosis (base deficit less than 15 mmol/L) and no visual disturbances should receive sodium bicarbonate and fomepizole. In these patients, the use of hemodialysis should be discussed with an experienced nephrologist or clinical toxicologist (Hovda & Jacobsen, 2008).
    F) FOMEPIZOLE
    1) Fomepizole, a specific antagonist of alcohol dehydrogenase, is approved for the treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning. It had previously been used in experimental animals and in humans and showed an apparent low level of toxicity and ability to replace ethanol as treatment for methanol poisoning (Brent et al, 2001; Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006; Megarbane et al, 2001; Burns et al, 1997; Brent et al, 1997; Blomstrand et al, 1980).
    2) AVAILABILITY
    a) Fomepizole (Antizole(R); 4-MP) is currently approved and available in the United States for the treatment of methanol poisoning (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    3) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Studies in healthy human volunteers have shown fewer adverse effects and a slower elimination rate compared with ethanol (McMartin et al, 1987).
    b) The most frequent adverse effects reported in 78 patients and 63 volunteers receiving fomepizole were headache (14%), nausea (11%), and dizziness, increased drowsiness, and dysgeusia (6% each) (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    c) Another study reported transient adverse effects including nausea, headache, eosinophilia, lymphangitis, and fever following therapeutic doses of fomepizole in acute methanol intoxication (Megarbane et al, 2001). Brent et al (2001) reported only minor transient adverse effects in 6 methanol-intoxicated patients treated with fomepizole (Brent et al, 2001).
    d) A placebo-controlled, double-blind study among HEALTHY volunteers showed mild, transient increase in liver function tests and slower elimination rate of fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole). The mild, sporadic, and transient elevations in blood pressure were not dose-related (Jacobsen et al, 1990).
    4) DOSE
    a) Dosing should be started immediately on suspicion of methanol ingestion based on patient history or anion gap metabolic acidosis, increased osmolar gap, visual disturbances, OR a documented methanol serum concentration of greater than 20 mg/dL (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    1) Give fomepizole loading dose of 15 mg/kg, followed by doses of 10 mg/kg every 12 hours for 4 doses, then 15 mg/kg every 12 hours thereafter until methanol concentrations are undetectable or have been reduced below 20 mg/dL and the patient is asymptomatic with normal pH. Administer all doses as a slow intravenous infusion over 30 minutes (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    2) Plasma level of fomepizole necessary to inhibit alcohol dehydrogenase is approximately 0.8 mcg/mL (Brent et al, 2001). Under fomepizole treatment, the decay of methanol follows first-order kinetics, with a plasma elimination half-life of methanol reported as 48 to 54 hours (Bekka et al, 2001; Brent et al, 2001).
    b) DOSING WITH HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Consider hemodialysis in addition to fomepizole therapy in cases of renal failure, severe metabolic acidosis, or a measured methanol concentration of greater than 50 mg/dL. Fomepizole is dialyzable; the frequency of dosing should be increased to every 4 hours during hemodialysis (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    a) DOSE AT THE BEGINNING OF HEMODIALYSIS: If less than 6 hours have elapsed since last dose, do not give a dose; if 6 hours or more have elapsed since the last fomepizole dose, give the next scheduled dose (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    b) DURING HEMODIALYSIS: 15 mg/kg IV loading dose, followed by 10 mg/kg IV every 4 hours for 4 doses, then 15 mg/kg IV every 4 hours until ethylene glycol or methanol concentrations are below 20 mg/dL (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    c) DOSING AT THE TIME HEMODIALYSIS IS COMPLETED: If the time between the last dose and the end of hemodialysis is less than 1 hour, do not give a dose; if the time between the last dose and the end of hemodialysis is 1 to 3 hours, give 50% of the next scheduled dose; if the time between the last dose and the end of hemodialysis is greater than 3 hours, give the next scheduled dose (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    c) One study recommended that critically ill patients with severe metabolic acidosis (base deficit greater than 15 mmol/L), visual disturbances, or both should receive sodium bicarbonate, fomepizole, and hemodialysis as soon as possible. Stable patients, with little to moderate metabolic acidosis (base deficit less than 15 mmol/L) and no visual disturbances should receive sodium bicarbonate and fomepizole. In these patients, the use of hemodialysis should be discussed with an experienced nephrologist or clinical toxicologist (Hovda & Jacobsen, 2008; Hovda et al, 2005).
    5) ADMINISTRATION
    a) Fomepizole solidifies at temperatures below 25 degrees C (77 degrees F); thus, the vial should be liquefied by running warm water over it or holding it in the hand. Solidification does NOT affect efficacy, safety, or stability. Draw appropriate fomepizole dose from vial and inject into at least 100 mL of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride injection or dextrose 5% injection. Infuse over 30 minutes (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    6) CONCURRENT FOMEPIZOLE AND ETHANOL
    a) A combination of fomepizole and ethanol does not appear to reliably decrease ethanol clearance antidotally during the treatment of methanol toxicity. Wax et al (1998) measured mean ethanol t1/2 and elimination rate after fomepizole (4-MP) dosing in 6 patients who had serum ethanol levels prior and during fomepizole (4-MP). Ethanol half-life and elimination rate were 4.3 hr (+/-2.6) and 25.1 mg/dL/hr (+/-32.6) before fomepizole (4-MP) and 2.6 hr (+/-0.8) and 14.6 mg/dL/hr (+/-7.4) after fomepizole (4-MP) (Wax et al, 1998).
    7) ETHANOL VERSUS FOMEPIZOLE
    a) In a cohort study of 172 cases of suspected methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning, fomepizole was associated with a lower adverse drug events rate than ethanol. At least 1 adverse drug event was identified in 74 of 130 (57%) ethanol-treated and 5 of 42 (12%) fomepizole-treated cases. The most frequent adverse effect was CNS depression (48% ethanol, 2% fomepizole). Severe adverse drug events occurred in 26 of 130 (20%) ethanol-treated patients (coma, extreme agitation, cardiovascular) and 2 of 42 (5%) fomepizole-treated patients (coma, cardiovascular). Serious (life-threatening) adverse events occurred in 11 of 130 (8%) ethanol-treated patients (respiratory depression, hypotension), and 1 of 42 (2%) fomepizole-treated patients (hypotension, bradycardia) (Lepik et al, 2009).
    8) CASE REPORTS/FOMEPIZOLE AND BICARBONATE: Four patients with methanol poisoning (the mean serum methanol level was 14.4 mmol/L {45 mg/dL} range 9.4 to 18.8) with moderate metabolic acidosis (mean pH was 7.23 {range 7.12 and 7.33}) and no visual disturbances were successfully treated with fomepizole and bicarbonate; hemodialysis was not required. Frequent acid/base monitoring was found to be normal throughout therapy, indicating that formic acid did not accumulate in any patient. The mean plasma half-life of methanol was 25 hours during treatment. The authors concluded that patients with serum methanol levels up to 19 mmol/L (60 mg/L), moderate metabolic acidosis, and no visual disturbances can be safely treated with fomepizole and bicarbonate without dialysis (Spillum et al, 2003). Because of the prolonged half-life of methanol in patients receiving fomepizole (25 hours or more), patients treated with fomepizole alone may require prolonged hospitalization.
    9) CASE REPORT (MIXED INGESTION): A 35-year-old man ingested a glass cleaner solution containing approximately 100 g methanol and 36 g isopropanol over a 24-hour period. Fomepizole was started about 5 hours after his most recent ingestion, with a starting dose of 10 mg/kg. This was given twice daily for 8 days, in a tapering dose schedule until methanol and isopropanol levels were undetectable. No adverse effects due to fomepizole were noted. The patient was discharged with no toxic-related sequelae (Bekka et al, 2001).
    10) PREGNANCY
    a) CASE REPORT (PREGNANCY): A 21-year-old woman with a long history of inhalant abuse and in the first trimester of pregnancy developed methanol poisoning (serum level, 24 mg/dL) after inhaling a carburetor cleaner. She received 1 dose of fomepizole (15 mg/kg) and vitamins. Her methanol level was then undetectable. The patient was discharged and returned again (now at gestational age of 16 to 17 weeks) when she was found inhaling the methanol product. She recovered following 1 dose of fomepizole and hemodialysis. No gross fetal anomalies were seen on ultrasound. The outcome of the pregnancy is unknown since the patient did not return for follow-up (Kulstad et al, 2001).
    11) ETHANOL INTERFERENCE
    a) A study in RATS demonstrated that the rate of fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole) elimination was decreased about 50% by concomitant administration of ethanol. In this study, fomepizole (4-MP) was dosed orally at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg and ethanol was dosed orally at 1 g/kg/hr for 3 hours (McMartin & Collins, 1988).
    G) ETHANOL
    1) EFFICACY
    a) Dosing the patient with ethanol effectively inhibits oxidation of methanol into its far more toxic products. Ethanol has about 20 times the affinity for alcohol dehydrogenase compared with methanol. This competitive effect of ethanol gains more time for excretion of unchanged methanol from the body, and it also inhibits the formation of methanol metabolites that produce severe acidosis. Formic acid is metabolized to carbon dioxide and water via a folate-dependent system.
    b) A rebound in blood formate levels was observed in 4 methanol-intoxicated patients after ethanol infusion was discontinued. In 2 well-documented cases, the formate levels rose from 2.4 to 2.5 mg/L during ethanol therapy to 43 and 100 mg/L after discontinuation. Methanol blood levels were 22 and 32 mg/dL, respectively (Mahieu et al, 1989).
    2) INDICATIONS
    a) Ethanol therapy must be considered in any of the following situations (Barceloux et al, 2002):
    1) Documented plasma methanol concentration greater than 20 mg/dL (greater than 200 mg/L);
    2) Documented recent history of ingesting toxic amounts of methanol and osmolal gap greater than 10 mOsm/L;
    3) History or strong clinical suspicion of methanol poisoning and at least 2 of the following criterion: arterial pH less than 7.3; serum bicarbonate less than 20 mEq/L; osmolol gap greater than 10 mOsm/L.
    3) PREPARATION
    a) CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE (V/V)
    1) In the United States, 5% or 10% (V/V) ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion is no longer available commercially (Howland, 2011a). Ethanol 10% (V/V) contains approximately 0.08 gram ethanol/mL.
    2) ABSOLUTE ETHANOL or dehydrated ethanol, USP contains no less than 99.5% volume/volume or 99.2% weight/weight of ethanol with a specific gravity of not more than 0.7964 at 15.56 degrees C. Absolute ethanol is hygroscopic (absorbs water from the atmosphere) and when exposed to air may be less than 99.5% ethanol by volume (S Sweetman , 2002).
    b) PREPARATION OF 10% V/V ETHANOL IN A 5% DEXTROSE SOLUTION
    1) A 10% (V/V) solution can be prepared by the following method (Howland, 2011a):
    a) If available, use sterile ethanol USP (absolute ethanol). Add 55 mL of the absolute ethanol to 500 mL of 5% dextrose in water for infusion. This yields a total volume of 555 mL. This produces an approximate solution of 10% ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion (Howland, 2011a).
    c) Instead of using a micron filter when preparing the ethanol infusion, possibly a better alternative would be to use the filter between the solution and the patient.
    4) PRECAUTIONS
    a) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) Hypoglycemia may occur, especially in children. Monitor blood glucose frequently (Howland, 2011a; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    b) CONCURRENT ETHANOL
    1) If the patient concurrently has ingested ethanol, then the ethanol loading dose must be modified so that the blood ethanol level does not exceed 100 to 150 mg/dL (Barceloux et al, 2002).
    c) DISULFIRAM
    1) Fomepizole is preferred as an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor in patients taking disulfiram. If fomepizole is not available, ethanol therapy should be initiated in those patients with signs or symptoms of severe poisoning (acidemia, toxic blood level) despite a history of recent disulfiram (Antabuse(R)) ingestion.
    2) The risk of not treating these patients is excessive, especially if hemodialysis is not immediately available.
    3) Administer the ethanol cautiously with special attention to the severity of the "Antabuse reaction" (flushing, sweating, severe hypotension, and cardiac dysrhythmias).
    4) Be prepared to treat hypotension with fluids and pressor agents (norepinephrine or dopamine). Monitor ECG and vital signs carefully. Hemodialysis should be performed as soon as adequate vital signs are established, and every effort should be made to obtain fomepizole.
    5) LOADING DOSE
    a) INTRAVENOUS LOADING DOSE
    1) Ethanol is given to maintain a patient’s serum ethanol concentration at 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% or 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line (10% ethanol is generally preferred due to the large volumes required for 5%). Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated. Begin the maintenance infusion as soon as the loading dose is infused (Howland, 2011a).
    b) ORAL LOADING DOSE
    1) Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentrations. The loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (4 mL/kg) of 20% (40 proof) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube(Howland, 2011a).
    6) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    a) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. Intravenous administration is preferred, but oral ethanol may be used if intravenous is unavailable(Howland, 2011a; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr)
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (1.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL*
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    b) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL DIALYSATE
    1) During hemodialysis maintenance doses of ethanol should be increased in accordance with the recommendation given below, or ethanol should be added to the dialysate to achieve a concentration of 100 milligrams/deciliter (Pappas & Silverman, 1982).
    c) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL-FREE DIALYSATE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL(Howland, 2011a; Barceloux et al, 2002):
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL* - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (1.3 to 1.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    2) Variations in blood flow rate and the ethanol extraction efficiency of the dialyzer will affect the dialysance(McCoy et al, 1979).
    3) If the ethanol dialysance ((CL)D) is calculated, the infusion rate during dialysis (Kod) can be individually adjusted using the following expression (McCoy et al, 1979):
    Kod = Vmax x   Cp   + (CL)D x Cp
                 -------
                 Km + Cp
    where Cp = desired blood ethanol level
    *  Vmax = 175 mg/kg/hr in chronic ethanol drinkers 
    *  Vmax = 75 mg/kg/hr in non-chronic drinkers
    *  Km = 13.8 mg/dL
    

    7) PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) There is very little information on ethanol dosing in the pediatric patient (Barceloux et al, 2002). The loading dose and maintenance infusion should be the same as for an adult non-drinker. Loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (8 mL/kg) of 10% ethanol infused over 1 hour, maintenance dose is 80 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) of 10% ethanol (Howland, 2011a).
    b) Blood ethanol concentration should be initially monitored hourly and the infusion rate should be adjusted to obtain an ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL (Howland, 2011a; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    1) Monitor blood glucose and mental status frequently during therapy (Howland, 2011a). Ethanol-induced hypoglycemia is more common in children (Barceloux et al, 2002) and children may develop more significant CNS depression.
    c) PEDIATRIC ADVERSE EFFECTS: In a retrospective review of 60 pediatric patients receiving oral or IV ethanol, the rate of clinically important adverse effects due to ethanol was low. Mild glycemia, drowsiness, 3% of patients with hypotension, and 1 patient with erosive gastritis were reported. Good prognosis was reported in children treated with ethanol in spite of a wide variation in ethanol levels (Roy et al, 2001; Roy et al, 2001a).
    8) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) ETHANOL CONCENTRATION
    1) Blood ethanol concentrations should be determined every 1 to 2 hours until concentrations are maintained within the therapeutic range (100 - 150 mg/dL). Thereafter concentrations should be monitored every 2 to 4 hours. Any change in infusion rate will require monitoring every 1 to 2 hours until the therapeutic range is reached and maintained (Barceloux et al, 2002).
    b) ADDITIONAL MONITORING
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes and blood glucose, monitor for CNS depression (Howland, 2011a).
    9) DURATION OF THERAPY
    a) SERUM CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE: Ethanol therapy should be continued until the following criteria are met:
    1) Methanol blood concentration, measured by a reliable technique, is less than 10 mg/dL.
    2) Formate blood concentration is less than 1.2 mg/dL (Abolin et al, 1980; Baumann & Angerer, 1979; Martin-Amat et al, 1978; Sejersted et al, 1983).
    3) Methanol-induced acidosis (pH, blood gases), clinical findings (CNS), electrolyte abnormalities (bicarbonate), serum amylase, and osmolal gap have resolved.
    b) NO SERUM CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE: When unable to obtain methanol blood levels, ethanol therapy should be initiated and the patient transported as soon as possible to a facility capable of measuring serum methanol concentrations and performing hemodialysis.
    1) Ethanol therapy should be continued for a minimum of 9 days in the absence of dialysis, 1 day when dialysis has been performed, or until clinical findings resolve, whichever is longer. It is extremely difficult to maintain therapeutic ethanol levels for long periods of time. Hemodialysis is strongly recommended in patients with acidosis or serum methanol levels of greater than 25 to 50 mg/dL.
    2) If the clinical findings have not resolved, it may indicate the continued presence of methanol, metabolites, both, or some other etiology.
    c) Based on pharmacokinetic theory, 93.75% of methanol is eliminated over a period of 4 elimination half-lives (Winter, 1988). Assuming a prolonged methanol elimination half-life of up to 52 hours during ethanol therapy (Palatnick et al, 1995), pharmacokinetic theory would predict elimination of 93.75% of the absorbed dose of methanol over 208 hours (9 days). Therefore, ethanol therapy (in the absence of hemodialysis) should be continued for at least 9 days.
    d) It is possible that 5-day treatment may be inadequate in some cases. Jacobsen et al (1988) reported zero-order elimination of methanol with a rate of 8.5 mg/dL/hr prior to institution of ethanol therapy or dialysis.
    e) Palatnick et al (1995) found that methanol elimination in the presence of treatment levels of ethanol follows first-order kinetics. However, since hepatic metabolism is inhibited by the ethanol, the primary pathways for elimination become renal and pulmonary clearance. These 2 mechanisms are very inefficient, and thus the methanol half-life is considerably prolonged, up to 52 hours.
    f) In a series of 3 methanol-poisoned patients treated with only ethanol and 3 cases retrieved from a literature review, methanol half-life while on IV ethanol was 43 hours (range 30 to 52 hours) (Palatnick et al, 1995). Because of the prolonged need for ethanol therapy and the difficulty in consistently maintaining therapeutic ethanol levels, these authors suggested that dialysis be considered in all patients requiring ethanol infusion.
    10) METHANOL INGESTION
    a) Patients who concurrently ingested ethanol and methanol may have a normal acid-base profile despite a dangerously elevated blood methanol level. Consider implementing the ethanol treatment regimen in these patients until a methanol level can be determined. Determine blood ETHANOL level before beginning ETHANOL therapy and modify the loading dose accordingly. Ingestion of Sterno fuel products (which contain greater than 60% ethanol and less than 4% methanol) may result in delayed toxicity due to the high ethanol concentration in these products.
    b) In a series of 84 chronic alcoholics who ingested a cleaning solution containing 90% ethanol and 5% methanol, no acidosis was reported despite mean methanol levels of 64 mg/dL and absence of specific therapy (ethanol or hemodialysis). Insufficient data are presented to determine the safety of this conservative treatment. Individual or pooled blood gas data are not given, although 13 patients were stated to have a decrease in base excess. No outcome data are given, and methanol levels were measured only until less than 48 mg/dL (Martensson et al, 1988).
    c) To modify the loading dose for the patients who have concurrently ingested ethanol, use the following equation to calculate the loading dose:
          LD=(100 mg/dL-existing) apparent
          ETOH plasma concentration) x vol of
               (in mg/dL) distribution

    d) Note the loading dose obtained by this method is the amount of pure ethanol in mg/kg. It must be converted for intravenous and oral use to mL/kg. This can be accomplished by using the following relationship:
                 LD(mg/kg)
    LD(mL/kg)=----------------------------------
              (spec gravity    (concentration
                of ETOH)        as a fraction)

    e) Ten percent (V/V) ethanol for intravenous infusion:
                   LD(mg/kg)
    LD(mL/kg)=---------------------------
                 (790 mg/mL) (10/100)

    f) 95 percent (V/V) ethanol for oral use:
                   LD(mg/kg)
    LD(mL/kg)=-------------------------- 
                 (754 mg/mL)  (95/100)

    g) Calculation of loading dose assumes instantaneous absorption.
    11) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) In a retrospective study, the hospital records of 49 adults treated with ethanol for methanol (n=15) or ethylene glycol (n=32) ingestion were evaluated. Two patients ingested both methanol and ethylene glycol. Adverse effects developed in 45 (92%) patients, including tachycardia (heart rate greater than 100 beats/min; n=16; 33%), hypotension (n=9; 18%), decreased level of consciousness (necessitating intubation; n=10; 20%), agitation (necessitating chemical or physical restraints; n=35; 71%), seizures (n=3; 6%), vomiting (n=11; 22%), and phlebitis (n=5; 10%). It is unclear if the adverse effects were related to the ethanol, underlying poisoning or other therapies. Hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 4 mmol/L) did not develop in any patients. Four patients died; 38% were admitted to an ICU unit and 92% of patients (n=45) were treated with hemodialysis. Serum ethanol concentrations were obtained a median of 6 times per case (range, 0 to 24). Patients were treated with ethanol for 0.5 to 119 hours (median, 21 hours). Serum ethanol concentration was within target range (22 to 30 mmol/L) in only 27% of measurements; 47% were below the target range and 25% were above the target range. Inappropriate change in ethanol dosing was reported in 59% of the cases when a serum ethanol concentration was outside the target. Inappropriate dosing changes were also reported during 69% of the hemodialysis sessions. Overall, 92% of patients survived and were discharged home (Wedge et al, 2012).
    H) FOLIC ACID
    1) Leucovorin and folic acid enhance the metabolism of formic acid (formate) to carbon dioxide and water (Noker et al, 1980a; Anon, 1979; Makar & Tephly, 1976).
    2) Either folic acid or leucovorin (folinic acid) may be used in patients with methanol toxicity (Howland, 2011). Leucovorin (folinic acid) is the active form of folic acid and does not require reduction by the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase in order to participate in reactions using folate as a source of one-carbon moieties. It may be used for the initial dose in symptomatic patients, but it is more expensive than folic acid and there is no data that it improves outcome compared with folic acid. In symptomatic patients (anion gap acidosis, visual disturbances) and asymptomatic patients with known or suspected methanol intoxication, administer intravenous folic acid.
    a) DOSE: 1 to 2 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours for the first 24 hours. It should be continued until methanol is cleared and acidosis resolved. Folate is removed by hemodialysis so in patients undergoing hemodialysis, administer one dose prior to and another at the completion of hemodialysis. In studies, the use of folic acid 50 to 70 mg IV every 4 hours for the first 24 hours did not produce any complications (Howland, 2011).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) OBSERVATION REGIMES
    1) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE/TRIMETHOXYSILANE -
    a) Exposed individuals should be observed for 24 to 72 hours for evidence of ophthalmologic changes. Treatment with cortisone and penicillin has been recommended in moderate exposures (ACGIH, 1986).
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Significant methanol toxicity is theoretically possible after exposure to a methoxy derivative alkoxysilane. Patients with significant methanol levels could benefit from dialysis, but there is no role for hemoperfusion, urinary alkalinization, or multiple dose activated charcoal.
    2) INDICATIONS: Peak blood methanol concentration greater than 50 mg/dL (15 mmol/L), severe acidosis regardless of the blood methanol level, severe acid-base and or fluid-electrolyte disturbances despite conventional therapy, renal failure, and visual symptoms are indications for dialysis (Prod Info Antizol(R), fomepizole injection, 2000; Vogt et al, 1993).
    3) EFFICACY: Hemodialysis is highly effective at removing methanol (McCoy et al, 1979; Girault et al, 1999) but ETHANOL or FOMEPIZOLE therapy should be continued during dialysis.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: A specific toxic dose has not been established. Exposure to tetramethoxysilane vapors at 200 to 300 parts per million (ppm) for 15 minutes is estimated to produce minimal corneal damage and 1000 ppm may cause serious corneal injury.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SPECIFIC SUBSTANCE
    1) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: Exposure in humans has produced irritation and other ophthalmic problems. Exposure to vapors at 200 to 300 parts per million (ppm) for 15 minutes is estimated to produce minimal corneal damage and 1000 ppm to produce serious injury (ACGIH, 1986)
    B) ANIMAL DATA
    1) Repeated oral doses of glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane 1 g/kg/day for 28 days did not produce systemic toxicity in rats (Dow, 1983).
    2) Inhalation of silicon tetrahydride 126 ppm for 1 hour produced no ill effects in rats (ACGIH, 1986).

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) Amyl/vinyl triethoxy derivatives
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 4.9-22.5 g/kg (Smyth et al, 1969a)
    B) Methoxy/ethoxy derivatives
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 1.2-12.5 g/kg (Smyth et al, 1969a)
    C) Tetramethoxysilane
    D) Trimethoxysilane
    1) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 9330 mg/kg (Lewis, 1996a)
    b) 1560 mcL/kg ((RTECS, 2000))

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Methoxy alkoxysilanes may produce methanol toxicity. Methanol is converted relatively slowly (one-fifth the rate of ethanol oxidation) in the human liver via formaldehyde into formic acid by the catalytic action of alcohol dehydrogenase.
    1) It is these two metabolites of methanol, rather than methanol per se, that are highly toxic and produce the severe metabolic acidosis, ocular symptoms, and other effects of acute methanol poisoning. (Formaldehyde is 33 times and formic acid six times more toxic than methanol.)
    B) Dosing the patient with ethanol effectively inhibits oxidation of methanol into its far more toxic products. Ethanol has about 20 times the affinity for alcohol dehydrogenase compared to methanol.
    1) This competitive effect of ethanol gains more time for excretion of unchanged methanol from the body, and it also inhibits the formation of methanol metabolites that produce severe acidosis.
    C) Formic acid (toxic) is metabolized to carbon dioxide and water (nontoxic) via a folate dependent system.
    1) Folic acid or leucovorin (active metabolite of folic acid) may enhance the elimination of formic acid following methanol overdose by stimulating formate oxidation or utilization (Noker et al, 1980).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Vinyltriethoxysilane vapors may have a sweet odor (Technical Information, 1985).
    B) Silicon tetrahydride has a disagreeable odor (ACGIH, 1986).
    C) Tetramethoxysilane exists as colorless needles (ACGIH, 1986).

Molecular Weight

    A) SILICON TETRAHYDRIDE: 32.09
    B) TETRAMETHOXYSILANE: 147.18
    C) DIETHOXYDIMETHYLSILANE: 148.31
    D) ETHOXYTRIMETHYLSILANE: 118.28
    E) TETRAETHOXYSILANE: 208.22
    F) METHYLTRIETHOXYSILANE: 178.2

General Bibliography

    1) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Hazardous Materials Systems (BOE), Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1987.
    2) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 5th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1986a, pp 174.
    3) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values, 5th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1986.
    4) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    5) Abolin G, McRae JD, & Tozer TN: Gas chromatographic head-space assay of formic acid as methyl formate in biological fluids: potential application to methanol poisoning. Biochem Med 1980; 23:209-218.
    6) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    7) Anon: Use of folate analogue in treatment of methyl alcohol toxic reactions is studied. JAMA 1979; 242:1961-1962.
    8) Barceloux DG, Bond GR, Krenzelok EP, et al: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(4):415-446.
    9) Baumann K & Angerer J: Occupational exposure to organic solvents: IV. Formic acid concentration in the blood and urine as an indication of methanol exposure. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1979; 42:241-249.
    10) Bekka R, Borron SW, & Astier A: Treatment of methanol and isopropanol poisoning with intravenous fomepizole. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:59-67.
    11) Bisesi MS: Esters. In Clayton GD & Clayton FE (eds) Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, pp 3096-3100.
    12) Blomstrand R, Ellin A, & Lof A: Biological effects and metabolic interactions after chronic and acute administration of 4-methylpyrazole and ethanol to rats. Arch Biochem Biophys 1980; 199:591-605.
    13) Brent J, McMartin K, & Phillips S: 4-Methylpyrazole (fomepizole) therapy of methanol poisoning: preliminary results of the meta trial (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35(5):507.
    14) Brent J, McMartin K, & Phillips SP: Fomepizole for the treatment of methanol poisoning. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:424-429.
    15) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    16) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    17) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    18) Burns MJ, Graudins A, & Aaron CK: Treatment of methanol poisoning with intravenous 4-methylpyrazole. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30:829-832.
    19) Carpenter CP & Smyth HF: Chemical burns of the rabbit cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29:1363-1372.
    20) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    21) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    22) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    23) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    24) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    25) DePass LR, Ballantyne B, & Fowler EH: Dermal oncogenicity studies on tow methoxysilanes and two ethoxysilanes in male C3H mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1989; 12:579-583.
    26) Dow: Dow Corning Corporation Material Safety Data Sheet, Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, MI, 1983.
    27) Duke-Elder S: Textbook of Ophthalmology, vol VI, CV Mosby Co, St Louis, MO, 1954, pp 6677-6678.
    28) Ekins BR, Rollins DE, & Duffy DP: Standardized treatment of severe methanol poisoning with ethanol and hemodialysis. West J Med 1985; 142:337-340.
    29) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    30) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    31) Girault C, Tamion F, & Moritz F: Fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole) in fatal methanol poisoning with early CT scan cerebral lesions. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:777-780.
    32) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    33) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    34) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye 4th edition, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    35) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    36) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    37) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    38) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    39) Hovda KE & Jacobsen D: Expert opinion: fomepizole may ameliorate the need for hemodialysis in methanol poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 2008; 27(7):539-546.
    40) Hovda KE, Froyshov S, Gudmundsdottir H, et al: Fomepizole may change indication for hemodialysis in methanol poisoning: prospective study in seven cases. Clin Nephrol 2005; 64(3):190-197.
    41) Howland MA: Ethanol. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011a, pp 1419-1422.
    42) Howland MA: Leucovorin (Folinic Acid) and Folic Acid. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    43) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    44) Isquith A, Matheson D, & Slesinski R: Genotoxicity studies on selected organosilicon compounds: in vitro assays. Food Chem Toxicol 1988; 26:255-261.
    45) Isquith A, Slesinski R, & Matheson D: Genotoxicity studies on selected organosilicon compounds: in vivo assays. Food Chem Toxicol 1988a; 26:263-266.
    46) Jacobsen D, Sebastian CS, & Barron SK: Effects of 4-methylpyazole, methanol/ethylene glycol antidote, in healthy humans. J Emerg Med 1990; 8:455-461.
    47) Kizer KW, Garb LG, & Hine CH: Health effects of silicon tetrachloride: report of an urban accident. J Occup Med 1984; 26:33-36.
    48) Kulstad E, Velez LI, & Roth B: Inhalational methanol poisoning during pregnancy treated twice with fomepizole (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:288-289.
    49) Lepik KJ, Levy AR, Sobolev BG, et al: Adverse drug events associated with the antidotes for methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning: a comparison of ethanol and fomepizole. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53(4):439-450.
    50) Lewis RJ Sr: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials 9th edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1996.
    51) Lewis RJ: Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, NY, 1996a.
    52) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    53) Mahieu P, Hassoun A, & Lauwerys R: Predictors of methanol intoxication with unfavorable outcome. Human Toxicol 1989; 8:135-137.
    54) Makar AB & Tephly TR: Methanol poisoning in the folate-deficient rat. Nature 1976; 261:715-716.
    55) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    56) Martensson E, Olofsson U, & Heath A: Clinical and metabolic features of ethanol-methanol poisoning in chronic alcoholics. Lancet 1988; 1:327-328.
    57) Martin-Amat G, McMartin KE, & Hayreh SS: Methanol poisoning: ocular toxicity produced by formate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1978; 45:201-208.
    58) McCoy HG, Cipolle RJ, & Ehlers SM: Severe methanol poisoning: application of a pharmacokinetic model for ethanol therapy and hemodialysis. Am J Med 1979; 67:804-807.
    59) McMartin KE & Collins TD: Distribution of oral 4-methylpyrazole in the rat: inhibition of elimination by ethanol. Clin Toxicol 1988; 26:451-466.
    60) McMartin KE, Jacobsen D, & Sebastian S: Safety and metabolism of 4-methylpyrazole in human subjects (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:471.
    61) Megarbane B, Borron SW, & Trout H: Treatment of acute methanol poisoning with fomepizole. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:1370-1378.
    62) Meyer E: Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977, pp 180.
    63) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    64) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    65) Noker PE, Eells JT, & Tephly TB: Methanol toxicity: treatment with folic acid and 5-formyl tetrahydrofolic acid. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 1980; 4:378-383.
    66) Noker PE, Eells JT, & Tephly TR: Methanol toxicity: treatment with folic acid and 5-formyl tetrahydrofolic acid. Alcohol Clin and Exp Res 1980a; 4:378-383.
    67) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    68) Palatnick W, Redman LW, & Sitar DS: Methanol half-life during ethanol administration: implications for management of methanol poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:202-207.
    69) Pappas SC & Silverman M: Treatment of methanol poisoning with ethanol and hemodialysis. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 126:1391-1394.
    70) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    71) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    72) Product Information: ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, fomepizole IV injection. Jazz Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Palo Alto, CA, 2006.
    73) Product Information: Antizol(R), fomepizole injection. Orphan Medical, Minnetonka, MN, 2000.
    74) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    75) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    76) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    77) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    78) Rowe VK, Spencer HC, & Bass SL: Toxicological studies on certain commercial silicones and hydrolyzable silane intermediates. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1948; 30:332-352.
    79) Roy M, Bailey B, & Chalut D: Outcome of methanol poisoning in children treated with ethanol: a 21-year perspective (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001a; 39:478.
    80) Roy M, Bailey B, & Chalut D: What are the adverse effects of ethanol used as an antidote in the treatment of methanol poisoning in children? (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:479.
    81) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Pharmaceutical Press. London, England (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    82) Sandmeyer EE & Kirwin CI: Silanes. In: Clayton GD & Clayton FE (Eds): Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxiciology, vol 2A, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1980, pp 2395-2396.
    83) Sax NI: Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 6th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1984.
    84) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    85) Sejersted OM, Jacobsen D, & Ovrebo S: Formate concentrations in plasma from patients poisoned with methanol. ACTA Med Scand 1983; 213:105-110.
    86) Smyth HF Jr, Carpenter CP, & Weil CS: Range finding toxicity data: List VII. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1969a; 30:470-476.
    87) Smyth HF, Carpenter CP, & Weil CS: Range-Finding Data: List IV. Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med 1951; 4:119-122.
    88) Smyth HF, Carpenter CP, & Weil CS: Range-Finding Toxicity Data: List VII. Arch Ind Hyg Occup Med 1969; 30:470-476.
    89) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    90) Spillum BJ, Hagset IB, Froyshov S, et al: Methanol poisoning: methanol kinetics in four patients during fomepizole treatment without dialysis (abstract). J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 2003; 41(4):397-398.
    91) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    92) Tamura A & Yuri H: Clinical and experimental investigation of ocular damage caused by trimethoxysilane. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1968; 72:40-47.
    93) Technical Information: Vinyltriethoxysilane. Material Safety Data Sheet, BDH Chemicals Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1985.
    94) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    95) Vogt MJ, Heffner JE, & Sahn SA: Vomiting, abdominal pain, and visual disturbances in a 31-year-old man. Chest 1993; 103:262-263.
    96) Wax P, Cobaugh D, & McMartin K: Effect of fomepizole (4MP) on ethanol elimination in ethylene glycol (EG) and methanol poisoned patients (abstract). J Tox-Clin Tox 1998; 36:512.
    97) Wedge MK, Natarajan S, Johanson C, et al: The safety of ethanol infusions for the treatment of methanol or ethylene glycol intoxication: an observational study. CJEM 2012; 14(5):283-289.
    98) Winter ME: Basic Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed, Applied Therapeutics, Inc, Vancouver, WA, 1988.