MOBILE VIEW  | 

IONIZING RADIATION

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) IONIZING RADIATION: Nuclear emissions that have sufficient energy to ionize atoms and remove one or more electrons from the orbit of other atoms. Radiation injuries occur secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation (eg, alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, x-rays, and neutrons). The radioactive exposure may be due to external irradiation (source at some distance from the body) or internal contamination (ingestion, inhalation, absorption through skin or wounds). The most common radionuclides in the atmosphere are: radon-222, tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, cesium-137, and krypton-85. Radioactive materials of military significance (Military Five) include: Tritium (3H), uranium (235U, 238U), plutonium (239Pu), and americium (241Am).

Specific Substances

    1) Acute radiation disease
    2) Acute radiation syndrome
    3) Ionizing radiation
    4) Radiation
    5) Radiation sickness
    6) Radiation toxicity
    7) Radiation, ionizing
    8) Radioactive material
    9) Radioactivity
    10) Radioisotopes
    11) Radionuclides
    12) Positrons

Available Forms Sources

    A) SOURCES
    1) IONIZING RADIATION: Nuclear emissions that have sufficient energy to ionize atoms and remove one or more electrons from the orbit of other atoms (Hallenbeck, 1994).
    2) Radiation exposure may occur in medical, industrial, and laboratory accidents in which individuals are exposed to unacceptably high doses of radiation (ICRP, 1977; Gains, 1989; Wagner et al, 1994). With increased use of radioactive materials, there is also an increased need for transport of such materials with the attendant risk of transport accidents and releases. In addition, there remains the possibility of exposure of large masses of people through detonation of nuclear weapons (Conklin et al, 1983).
    3) Radiation injuries occur secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation (eg, alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, x-rays, and neutrons). The radioactive exposure may be due to external irradiation (source at some distance from the body) or internal contamination (ingestion, inhalation, absorption through skin or wounds). The most common radionuclides in the atmosphere are: radon-222, tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, cesium-137, and krypton-85. Radioactive materials of military significance (Military Five) include: Tritium (3H), uranium (235U, 238U), plutonium (239Pu), and americium (241Am) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Berger, 2003; Jarrett, 1999; Diffre, 1990).
    4) Radiation is reported as being any one of 5 types: alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, X-rays, and neutrons (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    a) Alpha particles: Charged particles consisting of 2 protons and 2 neutrons that do not travel far (a few inches in the air) and that penetrate only a few micrometers into the skin. Alpha particles create ionization easily and can be blocked by thin clothing or paper. They are more of a concern when ingested or inhaled as opposed to simple contamination.
    b) Beta particles: Electrons emitted from the nuclei of particular isotopes, especially tritium and strontium-90, that can travel a couple of meters in the air and a few millimeters in tissue. A thin layer of plastic is an effective shield. Deposited on the skin, beta particles damage the basal layer, and cause radiation burns.
    c) Gamma rays: Electromagnetic radiation that is not particulate and is emitted by the nucleus. Gamma rays are very energetic and can easily pass through most matter, but they are not efficient at causing ionization. They are capable of causing internal organ damage, and can be shielded by lead or other dense materials.
    d) X-rays: Differ from gamma rays only in that they are emitted outside of the nucleus.
    e) Neutrons: Less commonly encountered, neutrons are uncharged particles that are capable of making another substance radioactive. They have a potential to cause future effects that is 3 to 20 times that of gamma rays.
    5) SOURCES OF LARGE RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES
    a) REACTOR ACCIDENTS: Radioactive substances such as I-131 may be released from nuclear power reactors (Jarrett, 1999; Becker, 1987). Nuclear energy production carries the extremely small risk of radiation accidents and radiation exposure of the general population worldwide (Champlin et al, 1988).
    b) WINDSCALE (Sellafield, England, 1957): 30,000 Ci of iodine-131, 12,000 Ci of tellurium-132, and 600 Ci of cesium-137 were released (Diffre, 1990). A curie (Ci) is a unit of activity equal to 3.61 x 10(10) disintegration per second.
    c) KYSCHTYMSK (Urals, 1957): 1 x 10(6) Ci of strontium-90 were estimated to have contaminated an area of 100 to 1,000 square kilometers (Diffre, 1990).
    d) THREE MILE ISLAND (USA, 1979): Approximately 6 x 10(11) Bq of iodine-131 was released (Diffre, 1990). A becquerel (Bq) is a unit of activity, with 1 Bq equal to 1 disintegration/second. 1 curie equals 3.61 x 10(10) Bq.
    e) CHERNOBYL (Byelorussia/Ukraine, 1986): 10 x 10(7) Ci of strontium-90 was reported to have been released, causing 2000 to 3000 square kilometers of soil to be unfit for agriculture (Diffre, 1990).
    f) 2011 EARTHQUAKE, TSUNAMI, and RADIATION RELEASE in JAPAN (March, 2011): On March 11, 2011, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and a tsunami caused serious widespread damage to the Fukushima nuclear power plant. An ongoing leak of radiation from this facility has forced the evacuation of hundreds of thousands of residents within 12 miles of the power plant (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/content/travel-health-precaution/2011-earthquake-tsunami-radiation).
    6) OTHER SOURCES
    a) POLONIUM-210 POISONING: In November 2006, a Russian man who was poisoned with radionuclide polonium-210 in London, UK, died several weeks post-exposure. At that time, it was determined that more than 700 individuals were exposed to polonium-210 and were tested for radiation poisoning. As an alpha-emitting radionuclide, polonium-210 is not an external hazard. It can be extremely toxic when absorbed into the body via inhalation and ingestion. Patients may develop acute radiation syndrome, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea during the prodromal phase. Later signs include loss of hair, bleeding, and multiple organ failure resulting in death (Fraser et al, 2012).
    b) MILK: Iodine-131 is concentrated in the milk of herbivorous animals.
    c) RADIUM-226: Is absorbed by plants and animals and its concentration in the human body results from ingestion of food (Diffre, 1990).
    d) RAINWATER: Usually contains beryllium, carbon-14, tritium, strontium-90, and cesium-137; total normal beta radioactivity is around 1 Bq/L (Diffre, 1990).
    e) UNDERGROUND WATER: Contains uranium-238 and related products and radium-226. It also contains radon-222 which can be highly concentrated at the source of thermal springs (Diffre, 1990).
    f) SEAWATER: Beta radioactivity, primarily from potassium-40, is around 10 Bq/L (Diffre, 1990).
    g) BULLETS: Depleted uranium, "DU", used in armor-piercing shells contains 99.75% U-238; soldiers handling or shot with these bullets may be exposed (Christensen, 1993).
    h) Common fission products from nuclear tests that have fallen onto the surface of the globe include: strontium-90, cesium-137, iodine-129, and iodine-131 (Diffre, 1990).
    1) Strontium-90 has chemical properties similar to calcium and is deposited in bone.
    2) Cesium-137 behaves similarly to potassium, but it remains in the human body 2 to 5 times longer.
    3) Iodine-129 has an atmospheric half-life of 16 x 10(6) years. Radioactive iodine is stored by mammals in the thyroid gland; there its concentration is 3 to 4 times that of exposed grass.
    B) USES
    1) AMERICIUM-241 is a decay daughter of plutonium and is an alpha emitter, readily detectable with a standard radiation detection instrument due to emission of a 60-kEv gamma ray. Its use includes smoke detectors and other instruments, and it is found in fallout from a nuclear weapon detonation. It is considered a heavy metal poison, but in large radioactive doses, can cause whole-body irradiation (Jarrett, 1999).
    2) CESIUM-137 may be found in medical radiotherapy devices. It was reported to be used in the Chechen RDD threat against Moscow. Both gamma rays and beta radiation are emitted and can be readily detected by gamma instruments. Whole-body irradiation is the primary toxicity, with deaths due to acute radiation syndrome reported (Jarrett, 1999).
    3) COBALT-60 is commonly used in medical radiotherapy devices and commercial food irradiators. Most commonly, contamination is discovered after improper disposal, or after destruction of a hospital or commercial facility. Generation of high-energy gamma rays and 0.31-MeV beta rays are produced. A gamma detector provides easy detection. Uses of cobalt include as a contaminant in an improvised nuclear device to make fallout more radioactive. Whole-body irradiation and acute radiation syndrome are its primary toxicities (Jarrett, 1999).
    4) DEPLETED URANIUM (DU) emits limited alpha, beta, and some gamma radiation, but poses no significant radiation threat. It is found in armor-piercing munitions, armor, and aircraft counterweights and is readily detectable with a typical end-window G-M (Geiger-Mueller) counter. DU oxides may be inhaled during tank fires or by entering destroyed armored vehicles without a protective mask. If DU metal fragments become encapsulated in wounds, they are gradually metabolized, resulting in whole-body distribution, especially to bones and kidney. No renal toxicity has been documented to date. DU does cross the placenta (Jarrett, 1999).
    5) IODINE-131, 132, 134, and 135 are found after reactor accidents and following the destruction of a nuclear reactor by hostile forces. Radioactive iodine (RAI), a normal fission product found in reactor fuel rods, is released by rupturing the reactor core and its containment vessel. Wind patterns at the time of destruction determine the fallout pattern. Most of its radiation is beta rays, with some gamma. Toxicity is primarily to the thyroid gland. RAI concentrates in the thyroid due to uptake by this gland, and allows local irradiation similar to therapeutic thyroid ablation. Following the Chernobyl disaster, an increased incidence of childhood thyroid carcinoma was reported (Jarrett, 1999).
    6) PHOSPHORUS-32 is usually found in research laboratories and in medical facilities used as a tracer. It emits strong beta rays and can be detected with the beta shield open on a beta-gamma detector. It is completely absorbed from all sites and is deposited in the bone marrow and other rapidly replicating cells. Local irradiation results in cell damage (Jarrett, 1999).
    7) PLUTONIUM-239, -238 are produced from uranium in reactors and is the primary fissionable material in nuclear weapons and is the predominant radioactive contaminant in nuclear weapons accidents. Its primary radiation is in the form of alpha particles, thus not presenting an external irradiation hazard. It is ALWAYS contaminated with americium, which is a fairly readily detectable x-ray by use of thin-walled gamma probe. Primary toxicity is via the inhalation route, with 5-micron or smaller particles remaining in the lung and metabolized based on its salt solubility. Local irradiation damage is caused by remaining particles in the lungs. The chemical state of plutonium determines its GI absorption, with the metal not being absorbed. After 24 hours, stool specimens are positive and after 2 weeks urine specimens are positive. Wound absorption is variable. Plutonium is able to be washed from intact skin (Jarrett, 1999).
    8) RADIUM-226 has no military use, but may be found in FSU equipment as instrument illumination, in industrial applications, and in older medical equipment. Its primary radiation is due to alpha particles, but daughter products emit beta and gamma rays, which in quantity may present a serious external irradiation hazard. Exposures are usually by ingestion, with 30% absorption. Wound absorption is not known, but radium will follow calcium to bone deposition. Leukemia, aplastic anemia, and sarcomas are associated with chronic exposures (Jarrett, 1999).
    9) STRONTIUM-90 is a direct fission product (daughter) of uranium, with it and its daughters emitting both beta and gamma rays which can be an external irradiation hazard if present in quantity. Strontium follows calcium and is readily absorbed via both respiratory and GI routes. Up to 50% of a radiation dose will be deposited in bone (Jarrett, 1999).
    10) TRITIUM (hydrogen-3) is a hydrogen with a nucleus composed of two neutrons and one proton. It has found use in nuclear weapons and in the U.S. (and other Western countries) in luminescent gun sights and muzzle-velocity detectors. It is NOT likely to be a hazard except within a confined space. Tritium gas is rapidly diffused into the atmosphere. Since tritium is a beta emitter, it is NOT a significant irradiation hazard. Water formed from tritium (HTO) is completely absorbed and equilibrates with body water. Excretion is via the urine, with urine samples positive within an hour of significant exposure. A single acute exposure has NOT been reported to result in any significant health effects (Jarrett, 1999).
    11) URANIUM-238, -235, -239 can be found, in increasing order of radioactivity, in depleted uranium (DU), natural uranium, fuel rods, and weapons-grade material. Alpha, beta, and gamma radiation are emitted from uranium and its daughters. Neither DU nor natural uranium present any serious irradiation threats. Significant levels of gamma particles are emitted from used fuel rods and weapons-grade (enriched) uranium containing fission products. Following placement of enough enriched uranium together, a critical mass may form and emit lethal levels of radiation. This scenario could occur in a fuel-reprocessing plant or melted reactor core. Following an acute exposure, uranium urine levels of 100 mcg/dL may cause renal failure (Jarrett, 1999).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) SOURCES: IONIZING RADIATION: Nuclear emissions that have sufficient energy to ionize atoms and remove one or more electrons from the orbit of other atoms. Radiation injuries occur secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation (eg, alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, x-rays, and neutrons). The radioactive exposure may be due to external irradiation (source at some distance from the body) or internal contamination (ingestion, inhalation, absorption through skin or wounds). Acute radiation syndrome may occur after total or near total body irradiation with a high dose of ionizing radiation over a short period of time. The most common radionuclides in the atmosphere are: radon-222, tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, cesium-137, and krypton-85. Radioactive materials of military significance (Military Five) include: Tritium (3H), uranium (235U, 238U), plutonium (239Pu), and americium (241Am).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: The response to exposure to ionizing radiation varies by cell type and is largely a function of the rate of cell replication or the cell cycle length. Cells are most vulnerable to the effects of radiation during mitosis; therefore, the tissue with the most mitotically active cells will be the most damaged. Spermatogonia, the cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and hematopoietic cells such as lymphocytes and erythroblasts are the most sensitive, while collagen-producing cells, muscle cells, and bone cells are less affected since they are not as mitotically active. Thus, the 3 syndromes that result are hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, and neurovascular, based on these decreasing radiation sensitivities. Increasing doses of ionizing radiation lead to increasing damage to the cells that are more radioresistant.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Radiation exposures are rare, but can be life-threatening.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) The clinical syndromes described for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) follow 4 clinical phases: prodromal, latent, manifest illness, and recovery (or death).
    a) HEMATOPOIETIC SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, nausea, vomiting; onset 1 hour to 2 days postexposure; lasts minutes to days
    2) Latent stage: Patients may appear well; stem cells are dying; lasts 1 to 6 weeks
    3) Manifest illness stage: Anorexia, fever, malaise. All blood cell counts decrease for weeks. Death from infection or hemorrhage. Increasing dose decreases survival. Most deaths within few months.
    4) Recovery: Bone marrow cells begin to repopulate the marrow. Large proportion will recover from few weeks up to 2 years. Death may occur at 1.2 Gy (120 rads). LD50/60 approximately 2.5 to 5 Gy (250 to 500 rads).
    b) GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, severe nausea, vomiting, cramps, diarrhea. Onset within few hours; lasts 2 days.
    2) Latent stage: Patients may appear well. Stem cells and gastrointestinal lining cells are dying; lasts less than 1 week.
    3) Manifest illness stage: Malaise, anorexia, severe diarrhea, fever, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance. Death from infection, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Death may occur within 2 weeks.
    4) Recovery: LD100 is about 10 Gy (1000 rads).
    c) CNS/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Extreme nervousness, confusion, severe nausea, vomiting, watery diarrhea, loss of consciousness, burning skin sensation. Onset within minutes; lasts minutes to hours.
    2) Latent stage: Partial functionality may return. May last for hours but usually less.
    3) Manifest illness stage: Return of watery diarrhea, seizures, coma. Onset 5 to 6 hours postexposure. Death within 3 days.
    4) Recovery: No recovery expected.
    2) CUTANEOUS RADIATION SYNDROME (CRS): Exposure to radiation can damage the basal cell layer of skin, resulting in inflammation, erythema, and dry or moist desquamation. Epilation may occur when hair follicles are damaged. A transient and inconsistent erythema and pruritus may occur within a few hours of exposure. Patients may develop intense reddening, blistering, and ulceration of the irradiated site during a latent phase that lasts from a few days up to several weeks. Although healing can occur, very large doses can cause permanent hair loss, damage sebaceous and sweat glands, atrophy, fibrosis, decreased or increased skin pigmentation, and ulceration or necrosis of the tissue. Patients may develop skin damage without ARS following radiation dose to the skin, especially after acute exposures to beta radiation or X-rays.
    3) Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism may occur. Both benign and malignant thyroid tumors have been associated with ionizing radiation exposure.
    4) COMBINED INJURY: Patients with combined injuries (trauma, thermal, chemical injury, and radiation exposure) may develop immunosuppression, delayed healing, pancytopenia, and other symptoms.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Four major effects of ionizing radiation on the fetus include: growth retardation; severe congenital malformations (including errors of metabolism); embryonic, fetal, or neonatal death; and carcinogenesis. Fetal risk is noted at exposures above 10 rem. In early pregnancy, fetal death may occur. Later in pregnancy, radiation exposure may be teratogenic or may cause fetal growth retardation.
    B) Occupational limits: Fetal dose (declared pregnancy): 0.5 rem (5 mSv). Although radiation doses to the embryo or fetus in the uterus is lower than the doses to its mother, health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation in human embryo and fetus can be severe, even at radiation doses too low to immediately affect the mother. Low-level ionizing radiation does not appear to increase the risk of teratogenicity. Consider doses of radioactive materials in specific fetal organs or tissues (eg, iodine-131 or iodine-123 in thyroid; iron-59 in the liver; gallium-67 in the spleen, strontium-90 and yttrium-90 in the skeleton). Approximately 5 Gy (500 rads) dose before 18 weeks' gestation can kill 100% of human embryos or fetuses; 50% of embryos may die with a fetal dose of 1Gy (100 rads).
    C) Cesium has been shown to penetrate the human placenta and be present in breast milk in mothers following exposures.
    D) Impaired fertility, including abnormal sperm production and impaired sexual function, has been reported in men. It is possible that radiation exposure in women may affect the viability of the ova and the function of the endocrine system which is responsible for production of some female sex hormones.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Ionizing radiation has carcinogenic effects in many tissues. The major toxicity of low- and moderate-dose ionizing radiation is cancer induction. Acute ionizing radiation exposure survivors have increased long-term cancer risks. A dose-response relationship exists between exposure to ionizing radiation and the risk for the subsequent development of cancer.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and repeat every 2 hours for symptomatic patients.
    B) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count, then every 4 hours for the first 8 hours, then every 6 hours for the subsequent 40 to 48 hours, then daily. Lymphocyte kinetics and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are sensitive indicators of radiation dose.
    C) Monitor for presence of sepsis or opportunistic infections, particularly in the presence of bone marrow depression and loss of intestinal mucosa.
    D) A baseline serum amylase level should be obtained to evaluate for parotitis; repeat in 24 hours. Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Electrolyte levels should be obtained when necessary.
    E) Obtain blood and tissue typing, if the examination suggests a high-dose exposure. These patients may need bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or peripheral stem cells due to pancytopenia.
    F) If the history indicated possible inhalation or ingestion of radioactive materials, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained for analysis, using any properly labeled sealed container. In addition, if inhalation may have occurred, nasal swabs should be obtained from each nostril, the amount of radiation in each should be measured with a handheld counter, and the 2 counts should be added. This amount divided by 0.1 provides a useful approximation of the inhaled dose, and this result can be compared with available tables that indicate the Annual Limit on Intake to determine if treatment is required (www.orise.orau.gov/reacts).
    G) Cytogenetic dosimetry, the gold standard method of measurement, should be ordered and obtained after 24 hours to determine the actual dose absorbed by the patient. However, there are only 2 laboratories in the United States that perform cytogenetic dosimetry and results are not available for a few days.
    H) Monitor for neurological symptoms, including a steadily deteriorating state of consciousness with coma and/or seizures during the neurovascular syndrome following very high acute radiation doses.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF TOXICITY
    1) Stabilize all patients from their traumatic injuries prior to evaluating them for radiation injuries. Although high intensity external radiation can cause tissue damage (eg, skin burns or marrow depression), it does not make the patient radioactive. However, all staff should be in scrubs covered with a water resistant gown or a Tyvek(R) suit. A cap, mask, and shoe covers should be worn, and 2 pairs of plastic gloves worn with the first pair taped to the gown or suit. Dosimeters should be worn at the collar but under the protective clothing.
    2) External decontamination should be performed, which is largely accomplished by removing and bagging the clothing, and washing the skin with warm water and soap. The history obtained at the scene is of great importance. The exact type of exposure (ie, internal versus external and partial versus whole body exposure) should be obtained. The main goals of therapy for acute radiation syndrome are prevention of neutropenia and sepsis. Examine the patient and repeat at 6 hours and 12 hours. Monitor vital signs, including temperature; the sooner the temperature rises, the greater the dose received. Trauma or other urgent medical or surgical situations should be managed prior to treatment for radiation exposure.
    3) INGESTION: Patients who ingested any radioactive matter should receive aluminum hydroxide or magnesium carbonate antacids to reduce absorption. Treat patients with persistent nausea and vomiting with granisetron or ondansetron. Early oral feedings are recommended to maintain gut function. All emesis should be collected for the first few days, saving for later analysis. Antidiarrheals may be used to control diarrhea. Internal contamination may require treatment with radiation countermeasure agents such as potassium iodide (radioactive iodine exposure), prussian blue (cesium and thallium exposure), or chelating agents (plutonium, americium, curium exposure). However, these agents do not protect against external radiation absorption and acute radiation syndrome.
    4) Colony-stimulating factor treatment should begin within 24 to 72 hours of exposure when granulocyte levels are falling, with daily therapy continued until the absolute neutrophil count increases to more than 1000 cells/mm(3). Patients who develop infection without neutropenia should have antibiotic therapy directed towards the source of infection and the most likely pathogen.
    5) LOCALIZED RADIATION INJURY: Localized radiation injury may also occur in conjunction with acute radiation syndrome, usually presenting with delayed erythema and desquamation or blistering 12 to 20 days after exposure. Treatment includes pain management, infection prevention, and vasodilators.
    6) PALLIATIVE CARE: Patients who vomited within a few minutes of exposure, with diarrhea developing in less than an hour, fever developing in less than 1 hour, severe headache, a possible history of loss of or altered consciousness, abdominal pain, parotid pain, erythema, and possible hypotension have likely received a lethal dose with poor prognosis. Palliative care should be started immediately, with initial treatment in the ICU if resources allow.
    7) Further information is available from the CDC (http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/) and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.remm.nlm.gov/). Emergency consultation services are also available through the Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 865-576-1005 (http://orise.orau.gov/reacts/).
    B) DECONTAMINATION
    1) DERMAL: Most decontamination (90%) is accomplished by removal of the outer clothing and shoes. A radiation detector passed over the body (held at a consistent distance from the body) can detect residual contamination. Further decontamination is accomplished by washing with warm soap and water, with gentle brushing while covering open wounds. Reduction of radiation to less than 2 times the background level is the goal of decontamination. Contaminated wounds require further effort. Abrasions are decontaminated with warm water and soap. Lacerations may require excision of contaminated tissue. Punctate lesions may be successfully cleaned using a water pick or oral irrigator. Shrapnel should be removed with forceps.
    2) INGESTION: Patients who ingested any radioactive matter should receive aluminum hydroxide or magnesium carbonate antacids to reduce absorption. Gastric lavage may be used if ingestion occurred within 1 to 2 hours, and large ingestions may benefit from cathartics and enemas.
    3) EYES: Obtain an x-ray to rule out presence of shrapnel in globe. If corneal contamination is present and globe is intact, carefully irrigate eyes with copious amounts of saline or water. Never irrigate a ruptured globe. To avoid contamination of nasolacrimal duct, direct irrigation stream away from inner canthus and toward outer canthus. Monitor the eyes for conjunctivitis after decontamination. The irrigation fluid should be tested frequently for residual radioactivity. Collect, store, and label irrigation fluid properly for forensic evaluation and proper disposal.
    C) RADIATION INFORMATION
    1) Several historical points should be quickly obtained when whole-body irradiation is a possibility: (1) location when the potential exposure occurred; (2) amount of possible shielding, including position inside a building; (3) amount of time outside away from shielding; and (4) occurrence of any vomiting or diarrhea. It should be documented whether any decontamination has occurred, and if any loss of consciousness was experienced. If trauma occurred, the mechanism of injury should be determined, and any medication use and allergy history recorded. MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION: In patients who have inhaled, ingested, or absorbed radioactive material through wound, direct measurement of radiation within the patient is a possible to guide therapy. Ingested radioactivity can be measured from collected urine. If inhalation may have occurred, nasal swabs should be taken as soon as possible in order to determine the approximate radiation exposure; combine the 2 measurements and divide by 0.1 to obtain the inhaled amount of radiation. Similar measurements may be taken from contaminated wounds. In all cases, the measurements can be converted into a measure of activity and compared with charts of known annual limits of intake to determine if the amount of radiation internally present is hazardous and requires treatment. Specific medical countermeasures may be employed to treat internal contamination, some of which depend on the specific radionuclide that has been ingested or inhaled.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer 100% oxygen as needed for respiratory support. Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may rarely be required.
    E) ANTIDOTES
    1) DEFEROXAMINE
    a) USES: Iron, manganese, neptunium, and plutonium.
    b) DOSES: Not specified by age: 1 g IM or IV (2 ampules) slowly (15 mg/kg/hr); IM is preferred; repeat as indicated as 500 mg IM or IV every 4 hours for 2 doses; then 500 mg IM or IV every 12 hours for 3 days.
    2) DIMERCAPROL
    a) USES: Antimony, arsenic, bismuth, gold, lead, mercury, nickel, polonium-210.
    b) DOSES: Not specified by age: 300 mg per vial for deep IM use, 2.5 mg/kg (or less) every 4 hours for 2 days, then twice daily for 1 day then once daily for days 5 to 10.
    3) EDETATE CALCIUM DISODIUM
    a) USES: Cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iridium, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, plutonium, ruthenium, yttrium, zinc, zirconium.
    b) DOSES: Not specified by age: 1000 mg/m(2)/day added to 500 mL dextrose 5% normal saline over 8 to 12 hours.
    4) DTPA, CALCIUM OR ZINC
    a) USES: Plutonium-239, Americium-241, Curium-244.
    b) DOSES: ADULTS: 1 g in 5 mL IV push over 3 to 4 minutes or IV infusion over 30 minutes diluted in 250 mL of 5% dextrose in water, Normal Saline (NS), or Ringers Lactate. Nebulized inhalation: 1 g in 1:1 dilution with water or NS. CHILDREN (age under 12 years): 14 mg/kg IV loading dose as soon as possible; MAX: 1 g.
    5) PENICILLAMINE
    a) USES: Antimony, bismuth, copper, gallium, gold, mercury, palladium, polonium.
    b) DOSES: Not specified by age: 250 mg daily orally between meals and at bedtime; may increase to 4 or 5 g daily in divided doses.
    6) POTASSIUM IODIDE
    a) USES: radioactive iodine.
    b) DOSES: ADULTS: 130 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine. CHILDREN (age 12 to 18 years, weight greater than 150 pounds): 130 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine. CHILDREN (age 12 to 18 years, weight less than 150 pounds): 65 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine. CHILDREN (age 3 to 12 years): 65 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine. CHILDREN (age 1 month to 3 years): 32.5 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine. CHILDREN (birth to 1 month): 16.25 mg orally daily for ingestion of radioactive iodine.
    7) PROPYLTHIOURACIL
    a) USES: Iodine-131.
    b) DOSES: Not specified by age: 2 tabs (50 mg each) 3 times daily for 8 days.
    8) PRUSSIAN BLUE
    a) USES: Cesium-137, thallium-201, rubidium.
    b) DOSES: ADULTS: 3 g orally 3 times daily. CHILDREN (age 2 to 12 years): 1 g orally 3 times daily.
    9) SUCCIMER
    a) USES: Arsenic, bismuth, cadmium, cobalt, lead, mercury, polonium.
    b) DOSES: CHILDREN: initial, 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days. Reduce frequency of administration to 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) every 12 hours (two-thirds of initial daily dose) for an additional 2 weeks of therapy (course of therapy: 19 days).
    F) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) Treat patients with persistent nausea and vomiting with granisetron or ondansetron. Early oral feedings are recommended to maintain gut function.
    G) DIARRHEA
    1) Antidiarrheals may be used for the control of diarrhea (eg, loperamide or diphenoxylate/atropine).
    H) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Colony-stimulating factors (FILGRASTIM: ADULTS: 2.5 to 5 mcg/kg once daily subQ. SARGRAMOSTIM: ADULTS: 5 to 10 mcg/kg once daily subQ. PEGFILGRASTIM: ADULTS: 6 mg once subQ) should begin within 24 to 72 hours of exposure when granulocyte levels are falling, with daily therapy continued until the absolute neutrophil count increases to more than 1000 cells/mm(3). Patients who develop infection without neutropenia should have antibiotic therapy directed towards the source of infection and the most likely pathogen. If febrile neutropenia develops, consultation with infectious disease and hematology specialists should be obtained, and guidelines on febrile neutropenia from the Infectious Disease Society of America should be followed for appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients who received doses of 7 to 10 Gy (700 to 1000 rads) should be considered for bone marrow stem cell transplants. The Radiation Injury Treatment Network was founded to assist in situations in which profound damage to the bone marrow has occurred, and it can be reached at: http://bloodcell.transplant.hrsa.gov/ABOUT/RITN/index.html. If transfusion of blood products is required, all products should leukoreduced and irradiated to 25 Gy in order to avoid a transfusion-related graft-vs-host reaction.
    I) HYPOTENSION
    1) Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids; if hypotension persists, administer vasopressors.
    J) SEIZURES
    1) IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol if seizures recur or persist.
    K) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) In one in vitro study, charcoal hemoperfusion was NOT effective in decreasing radioactivity in artificial media containing cesium-137.
    L) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Any patient who is asymptomatic, totally decontaminated as indicated by survey, and has a normal CBC and platelet count may be safely discharged. Follow-up instructions should include a repeat CBC in 48 hours and reevaluation following the onset of any gastrointestinal symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea).
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Admission is required for fluid and electrolyte therapy if severe vomiting and diarrhea are present. Patients manifesting thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia, and/or lymphopenia require hospital admission. Hospital admission is also necessary for standard indications for multiple trauma or burns associated with radiation exposure.
    3) CONSULT CRITERIA: For patients with localized injury, referral may be required for plastic surgery, grafting, or amputation.
    4) PATIENT-TRANSFER CRITERIA: Initially, patients should be field-triaged to a facility designated for handling radioactively-contaminated patients. Other conditions (eg, multiple trauma) may necessitate transporting patients to a trauma center. After stabilization, decontamination, and initial evaluation, patients with the hematopoietic syndrome should be transferred to a facility with expertise in the treatment of pancytopenia. If transfer is indicated, it should be undertaken on the first day or as soon as possible.
    M) PITFALL
    1) Early symptoms of radiation exposure may be delayed or not evident (eg, myelosuppression). Appropriate therapy may be delayed due to failure to contact a radiation specialist. Beware of secondary exposures that may come from rescuers who were also exposed. History of radiation exposure may be difficult to obtain in some settings.
    N) KINETICS
    1) Systemic contamination will occur following ingestion, inhalation, skin absorption, or wound contamination of radioactive material. Following absorption, a radionuclide crosses capillary membranes through passive and active diffusion mechanisms and then is distributed throughout the body. Rate of distribution to each organ is dependent on organ metabolism, ease of chemical transport, and the affinity of the radionuclide for chemicals within the organ. The organs with the highest capacities for binding radionuclides are the liver, kidney, adipose tissue, and bone due to their high protein and lipid makeup. Each radionuclide has a unique half-life, with half-lives ranging from extremely short (fraction of a second) to millions of years. Samples of some radionuclides and their half-lives are: Tc-99m: 6 hours; I-131: 8.05 days; Co-60: 5.26 years; Sr-90: 28.1 years; Pu-239: 24,400 years; U-238: 4,150,000,000 years.
    O) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Local injuries such as chemical or thermal burn, insect bite, skin disease or allergy, trauma; food poisoning, gastroenteritis; chemotherapeutic agents, or myelosuppression agents.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) In patients who have inhaled radioactive material, direct measurement of radiation within the patient is possible to guide therapy. Nasal swabs should be taken as soon as possible in order to determine the approximate radiation exposure; combine the 2 measurements and divide by 0.1 to obtain the inhaled amount of radiation. In all cases, the measurements can be converted into a measure of activity and compared with charts of known annual limits of intake to determine if the amount of radiation internally present is hazardous and requires treatment. Specific medical countermeasures may be employed to treat internal contamination, some of which depend on the specific radionuclide that has been inhaled.
    B) Refer to ORAL OVERVIEW AND MAIN SECTIONS for specific treatment information.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) Most decontamination (90%) is accomplished by removal of the outer clothing and shoes. A radiation detector passed over the body (held at a consistent distance from the body) can detect residual contamination. Further decontamination is accomplished by washing with warm soap and water, with gentle brushing while covering open wounds. Reduction of radiation to less than 2 times the background level is the goal of decontamination. Contaminated wounds require further effort. Abrasions are decontaminated with warm water and soap. Lacerations may require excision of contaminated tissue. Punctate lesions may be successfully cleaned using a water pick or oral irrigator. Shrapnel should be removed with forceps.
    2) Refer to ORAL OVERVIEW AND MAIN SECTIONS for specific treatment information.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: UNITS: The basic units of measure of ionizing radiation are the rad and the gray (Gy). One rad equals 0.01 joules of energy deposited per kilogram of tissue. One Gy equals 100 rads or 1 joule per kilogram. One sievert (Sv) is equivalent to 100 rems, where 1 rem is 1 Gy multiplied by a factor that depends on the type of radiation received. For gamma radiation, this factor is 1, so that 1 Sv equals 1 Gy equals 100 rads equals 100 rems. For alpha radiation, the factor is 20, so that 1 rad equals 20 rems (or Sv). The factor is 1 for beta radiation and between 3 and 20 for neutron energy.
    B) Acute radiation syndrome is a symptom complex following whole body irradiation (greater than 1 Gy). It varies in nature and severity, depending upon: (a) dose measured in gray (Gy), (b) dose rate (dose of radiation per unit of time), (c) dose distribution, and (d) individual susceptibility. Whole-body radiation doses can be divided into potentially lethal (2 to 10 Gy), sublethal (less than 2 Gy), and supralethal (greater than 10 Gy) doses.
    1) HEMATOPOIETIC (BONE MARROW) SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads). GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads). NEUROVASCULAR/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads). CUTANEOUS RADIATION SYNDROME: Presentation of Local Radiation Injury defined by dose received: 3 Gy: Epilation (hair loss) begins 14 to 21 days after exposure. 6 Gy: Erythema that may be transient soon after exposure (primary erythema), may again appear 14 to 21 days following exposure (secondary erythema). It may also occur from time to time. 0 to 15 Gy: Dry desquamation is the response of the germinal epidermal layer that is seen 20 days after exposure. Mitotic activity slows in the basal and parabasal layers, the epidermis thins, and large flakes of skin desquamate. 20 to 50 Gy: Wet desquamation occurs as a partial thickness injury. There is intracellular edema, a coalescence of vesicles forming macroscopic bullae, and fibrin coating a wet dermal surface. Radionecrosis may develop as the dose increases. Greater than 50 Gy: Damage to endothelial cells and fibrinoid necrosis of the vasculature cause radionecrosis and ulceration.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) SOURCES: IONIZING RADIATION: Nuclear emissions that have sufficient energy to ionize atoms and remove one or more electrons from the orbit of other atoms. Radiation injuries occur secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation (eg, alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, x-rays, and neutrons). The radioactive exposure may be due to external irradiation (source at some distance from the body) or internal contamination (ingestion, inhalation, absorption through skin or wounds). Acute radiation syndrome may occur after total or near total body irradiation with a high dose of ionizing radiation over a short period of time. The most common radionuclides in the atmosphere are: radon-222, tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, cesium-137, and krypton-85. Radioactive materials of military significance (Military Five) include: Tritium (3H), uranium (235U, 238U), plutonium (239Pu), and americium (241Am).
    B) TOXICOLOGY: The response to exposure to ionizing radiation varies by cell type and is largely a function of the rate of cell replication or the cell cycle length. Cells are most vulnerable to the effects of radiation during mitosis; therefore, the tissue with the most mitotically active cells will be the most damaged. Spermatogonia, the cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and hematopoietic cells such as lymphocytes and erythroblasts are the most sensitive, while collagen-producing cells, muscle cells, and bone cells are less affected since they are not as mitotically active. Thus, the 3 syndromes that result are hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, and neurovascular, based on these decreasing radiation sensitivities. Increasing doses of ionizing radiation lead to increasing damage to the cells that are more radioresistant.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Radiation exposures are rare, but can be life-threatening.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) The clinical syndromes described for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) follow 4 clinical phases: prodromal, latent, manifest illness, and recovery (or death).
    a) HEMATOPOIETIC SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, nausea, vomiting; onset 1 hour to 2 days postexposure; lasts minutes to days
    2) Latent stage: Patients may appear well; stem cells are dying; lasts 1 to 6 weeks
    3) Manifest illness stage: Anorexia, fever, malaise. All blood cell counts decrease for weeks. Death from infection or hemorrhage. Increasing dose decreases survival. Most deaths within few months.
    4) Recovery: Bone marrow cells begin to repopulate the marrow. Large proportion will recover from few weeks up to 2 years. Death may occur at 1.2 Gy (120 rads). LD50/60 approximately 2.5 to 5 Gy (250 to 500 rads).
    b) GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, severe nausea, vomiting, cramps, diarrhea. Onset within few hours; lasts 2 days.
    2) Latent stage: Patients may appear well. Stem cells and gastrointestinal lining cells are dying; lasts less than 1 week.
    3) Manifest illness stage: Malaise, anorexia, severe diarrhea, fever, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance. Death from infection, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Death may occur within 2 weeks.
    4) Recovery: LD100 is about 10 Gy (1000 rads).
    c) CNS/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads).
    1) Prodromal stage: Extreme nervousness, confusion, severe nausea, vomiting, watery diarrhea, loss of consciousness, burning skin sensation. Onset within minutes; lasts minutes to hours.
    2) Latent stage: Partial functionality may return. May last for hours but usually less.
    3) Manifest illness stage: Return of watery diarrhea, seizures, coma. Onset 5 to 6 hours postexposure. Death within 3 days.
    4) Recovery: No recovery expected.
    2) CUTANEOUS RADIATION SYNDROME (CRS): Exposure to radiation can damage the basal cell layer of skin, resulting in inflammation, erythema, and dry or moist desquamation. Epilation may occur when hair follicles are damaged. A transient and inconsistent erythema and pruritus may occur within a few hours of exposure. Patients may develop intense reddening, blistering, and ulceration of the irradiated site during a latent phase that lasts from a few days up to several weeks. Although healing can occur, very large doses can cause permanent hair loss, damage sebaceous and sweat glands, atrophy, fibrosis, decreased or increased skin pigmentation, and ulceration or necrosis of the tissue. Patients may develop skin damage without ARS following radiation dose to the skin, especially after acute exposures to beta radiation or X-rays.
    3) Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism may occur. Both benign and malignant thyroid tumors have been associated with ionizing radiation exposure.
    4) COMBINED INJURY: Patients with combined injuries (trauma, thermal, chemical injury, and radiation exposure) may develop immunosuppression, delayed healing, pancytopenia, and other symptoms.

Vital Signs

    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Fever is often noted during the prodromal phase of illness (Donnelly et al, 2010; Koenig et al, 2005), and the timing of fever onset is related to the dose of radiation absorbed; the earlier the rise in temperature, the greater the does of radiation received. Temperature elevation within the first 5 to 6 hours indicates a radiation dose of greater than 2.5 Gy (250 rads) (Berger, 2003)

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) CONJUNCTIVITIS: May develop if the dose of radiation was near the eyes and may occur during the prodromal phase (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Donnelly et al, 2010).
    2) BLINDNESS: Sudden exposure to high-intensity visible light and infrared radiation from detonation will result in eye injury of the chorioretinal areas. Using binoculars will increase the likelihood of damage. Eye injury is due to both infrared energy and photochemical reactions that occur within the retina with light wavelengths in the range of 400 to 500 micrometers (Jarrett, 1999).
    a) Retinal burns will occur in persons looking directly at the flash. Night vision apparatus (NVA) does NOT amplify the infrared and damaging wavelengths NOR does it cause retinal injury (Jarrett, 1999).
    b) Flashblindness occurs with peripheral observation of a brilliant flash of intense light energy and is a temporary condition due to depletion of photopigment from the retina. This may last for a few seconds (daytime) up to 30 minutes (night-time) (Jarrett, 1999).
    3) CATARACTS: CASE SERIES: Cataracts developed in 8 of 15 patients studied 6 years after being exposed to large amounts of beta radiation during the Chernobyl accident (Peter et al, 1994).
    4) NYSTAGMUS: A continuous rolling movement of the eyeballs has been noted in patients following radiation exposure (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ABNORMAL SENSATIONS: Persons exposed to ionizing radiation may complain of abnormal sensations of taste and smell (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) ABNORMAL SENSATIONS: Persons exposed to ionizing radiation may complain of abnormal sensations of taste and smell (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension is noted during the prodromal phase and may occur during the neurovascular syndrome or as a result of hypovolemia (Donnelly et al, 2010; Jarrett, 1999).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PNEUMONITIS
    1) Early radiation-induced lung injury with diffuse alveolar damage has been reported in patients after inhalational exposure to greater than 8 to 10 Gy (800 to 1000 rads) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) Radiation pneumonitis is a well-recognized syndrome associated with pulmonary radiation injury (secondary to radiation therapy) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Gibson et al, 1988) and as an effect from exposure to elevated levels of airborne radioactive particles (dust) from reactor halls of nuclear power plants (Salovsky et al, 2000).
    3) A latent period between radiation exposure and development of acute pulmonary reactions is common. Dyspnea (in 93 percent of patients) and cough (in 58 percent of patients) are the most common symptoms. Routine chest examinations usually reveal normal physical findings. Skin changes due to radiation exposure do not correlate well with pulmonary changes. Early onset of symptoms may indicate a more serious clinical course (Movsas et al, 1997).
    B) FIBROSIS OF LUNG
    1) Radiation pulmonary fibrosis resulting from chronic lung damage is another well-recognized syndrome associated with pulmonary radiation injury (secondary to radiation therapy) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Movsas et al, 1997). Evolution of permanent fibrotic changes usually occurs over 6 to 24 months, then remains stable after 2 years. Patients may have no previous pneumonitis and may be asymptomatic or have varying degrees of dyspnea. If a large volume of lung is irradiated, chronic pulmonary insufficiency may evolve and may progress to pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale (Movsas et al, 1997).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) NEUROVASCULAR/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME
    1) The nervous system is the target organ system that is the least sensitive to radiation, compared with the other 2 organ systems involved in ARS (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    2) CDC has provided the following information: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    a) Prodromal stage: Extreme nervousness, confusion, severe nausea, vomiting, watery diarrhea, loss of consciousness, burning skin sensation. Onset within minutes; lasts minutes to hours.
    b) Latent stage: Partial functionality may return. May last for hours but usually less.
    c) Manifest illness stage: Return of watery diarrhea, seizures, coma. Onset 5 to 6 hours postexposure. Death within 3 days.
    d) Recovery: No recovery expected.
    3) With exposures over 10 Gy (1000 rads), vomiting is suppressed, but patients are more generally fatigued (known as the 'fatigue syndrome'). Further features include headache, fever, altered reflexes, confusion, disorientation, dizziness, ataxia, and loss of consciousness (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    4) When exposure exceeds 35 Gy (3500 rads), larger blood vessels are damaged, which may cause circulatory collapse and may be associated with increased intracerebral pressure, vasculitis, and meningitis (Donnelly et al, 2010; Koenig et al, 2005). Patients will also experience nausea, vomiting, prostration, hypotension, ataxia, and seizures (Koenig et al, 2005). Exposure to over 50 Gy (5000 rads) will result in death within 48 hours (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    B) HEADACHE
    1) A headache occurring early (within a few minutes of exposure) indicates exposure to a supralethal dose (greater than 12 Gy) (Andrews & Cloutier, 1965).
    2) Headache is part of the 'fatigue syndrome' that can occur with exposures that exceed 10 Gy (1000 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    3) Transient headache may be present after a low-dose exposure of 0.35 Gy (35 rads) that does not represent acute radiation syndrome. However, headache is also reported in patients with much higher exposure, associated with other symptoms, depending on the dose received (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    C) CLOUDED CONSCIOUSNESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Disorientation and confusion are part of the 'fatigue syndrome' that can occur with exposures that exceed 10 Gy (1000 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    D) LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Loss of consciousness is part of the 'fatigue syndrome' that can occur with exposures that exceed 10 Gy (1000 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    E) PAROTITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The cells of the parotid gland are very sensitive to ionizing radiation; therefore, the development of parotitis, noted typically during the prodromal phase of illness, indicates radiation exposure (Berger, 2003).
    F) FATIGUE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Fatigue is part of the 'fatigue syndrome' that results from exposures above 10 Gy (1000 rads), and is associated with headache, fever, altered reflexes, confusion, disorientation, ataxia, and loss of consciousness (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    G) DIZZINESS
    1) Patients may experience vertigo following radiation exposure (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).
    H) ATAXIA
    1) Ataxia may be noted in patients exposed to high doses of radiation (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).
    I) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures will occur within a few minutes of exposure to a supralethal dose (greater than 12 Gy) but are rare (Andrews & Cloutier, 1965). One source reported that very high acute radiation doses associated with an early transient syndrome (lower limit of exposure, 20 to 40 Gy) are followed by a deteriorating state of consciousness with vascular instability, and seizures; increased intracranial pressure may or may not occur (Jarrett, 1999).
    2) In the children of pregnant Japanese atomic bomb survivors, the incidence of seizure was highest following irradiation at the 8th through 15th weeks after fertilization (Dunn et al, 1990).
    J) NEUROLOGICAL DEFICIT
    1) In a cohort of 888 children whose mothers were exposed to ionizing radiation from atom bomb detonations, those who were exposed at 8 to 15 weeks postovulation had significantly worse scores on repetitive action tests. Those exposed at 0 to 7 weeks postovulation had decreased IQ's. These effects were not seen in children whose mothers were exposed at weeks 16 to 25 postovulation (Yoshimaru et al, 1995).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME
    1) CDC has provided the following information: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    a) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, severe nausea, vomiting, cramps, diarrhea. Onset within few hours; lasts 2 days .
    b) Latent stage: Patients may appear well. Stem cells and gastrointestinal lining cells are dying; lasts less than 1 week.
    c) Manifest illness stage: Malaise, anorexia, severe diarrhea, fever, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance. Death from infection, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Death may occur within 2 weeks.
    d) Recovery: LD100 is about 10 Gy (1000 rads).
    2) Nausea, vomiting (sometimes severe), anorexia, and crampy abdominal pain occur within 1 to 2 hours of radiation exposure. Diarrhea early in the course is considered an ominous sign. Exposures over 10 Gy (1000 rads) may actually suppress vomiting. Death usually occurs within weeks of radiation exposure, resulting from multisystem organ failure, sepsis, or bleeding (Donnelly et al, 2010). Survival is considered highly unlikely with this syndrome (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    3) MECHANISM: Because they have a rapid turnover rate, the cells of the gastrointestinal tract, particularly the small intestinal villi, are affected earliest by exposure to ionizing radiation. Shrinkage of villi and morphological changes in mucosal cells occur as new cell production is diminished. Denudation of the intestinal mucosa occurs. Concomitant injury to the microvasculature of the mucosa results in hemorrhage and marked fluid and electrolyte loss leading to shock. These events generally occur within 1 to 2 weeks following irradiation. Direct radiation exposure of the vomiting center in the medulla oblongata will also cause nausea and vomiting (Jarrett, 1999).
    B) NAUSEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild nausea may be present after a low-dose exposure of 0.35 Gy (35 rads) that does not represent acute radiation syndrome (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    b) Nausea is present following exposure to ionizing radiation at levels great enough to cause acute radiation sickness, and is typically present during the prodromal phase (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    c) POLONIUM-210 POISONING: As an alpha-emitting radionuclide, polonium-210 is not an external hazard. It can be extremely toxic when absorbed into the body via inhalation and ingestion. Patients may develop acute radiation syndrome, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea during the prodromal phase. Later signs include loss of hair, bleeding, and multiple organ failure resulting in death (Fraser et al, 2012).
    C) VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Vomiting is present following exposure to ionizing radiation at levels great enough to cause acute radiation sickness, and this symptom is typically present during the prodromal phase. The time to the onset of vomiting following total body irradiation is an indication of the dose received up to approximately 10 Gy (1000 rads), at which point vomiting is suppressed (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    b) Fewer than 50% of patients will vomit after an exposure of 2 to 3 Gy (200 to 300 rads), and at doses of 5 to 6 Gy (500 to 600 rads), up to 90% will vomit (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    1) Estimation of dose received based on time to onset of vomiting after single acute exposure: Less than 10 minutes: greater than 8 Gy (800 rads); less than 30 minutes: 6 to 8 Gy (600 to 800 rads); less than 1 hour: 4 to 6 Gy (400 to 600 rads); 1 to 2 hours: 2 to 4 Gy (200 to 400 rads); more than 2 hours or no vomiting: less than 2 Gy (200 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010)
    c) Bloody vomiting may occur secondary to exposure to higher doses (Finch, 1987).
    d) POLONIUM-210 POISONING: As an alpha-emitting radionuclide, polonium-210 is not an external hazard. It can be extremely toxic when absorbed into the body via inhalation and ingestion. Patients may develop acute radiation syndrome, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea during the prodromal phase. Later signs include loss of hair, bleeding, and multiple organ failure resulting in death (Fraser et al, 2012).
    D) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Crampy abdominal pain is a typical finding in patients exposed to 6 to 10 Gy (600 to 1000 rads), occurring within 1 to 2 hours of exposure (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    E) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The early occurrence of diarrhea is an ominous finding in patients exposed to more than 6 Gy (600 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010). Acute onset of diarrhea is associated with an exposure to more than 9 Gy (900 rads) (Berger, 2003).
    b) Persistent diarrhea may be bloody. The presence of high fever and persistent bloody diarrhea secondary to high doses is an ominous sign (Andrews & Cloutier, 1965). Immediate explosive bloody diarrhea indicates a potentially lethal dose (Conklin et al, 1983).
    c) POLONIUM-210 POISONING: As an alpha-emitting radionuclide, polonium-210 is not an external hazard. It can be extremely toxic when absorbed into the body via inhalation and ingestion. Patients may develop acute radiation syndrome, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea during the prodromal phase. Later signs include loss of hair, bleeding, and multiple organ failure resulting in death (Fraser et al, 2012).
    F) SERUM AMYLASE RAISED
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Maximum amylase levels are seen with exposures between 4 to 10 Gy (400 and 1000 rads) (Berger, 2003).
    G) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anorexia is generally present during the prodromal phase for most patients with acute radiation exposure (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    H) ESOPHAGEAL INJURY
    1) RADIATION-INDUCED ESOPHAGEAL INJURY: Although the esophagus is a relatively radiation-tolerant organ, development of acute radiation esophagitis during treatment of a number of cancers may be common and chronic radiation esophagitis and perhaps radiation-induced esophageal cancer may also occur (Vanagunas et al, 1990).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) HEMATOPOIETIC (BONE MARROW) SYNDROME
    1) CDC has provided the following information: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads).(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    a) Prodromal stage: Anorexia, nausea, vomiting; onset 1 hour to 2 days postexposure; lasts minutes to days
    b) Latent stage: Patients may appear well; stem cells are dying; lasts 1 to 6 weeks
    c) Manifest illness stage: Anorexia, fever, malaise. All blood cell counts decrease for weeks. Death from infection or hemorrhage. Increasing dose decreases survival. Most deaths within few months.
    d) Recovery: Bone marrow cells begin to repopulate the marrow. Large proportion will recover from few weeks up to 2 years. Death may occur at 1.2 Gy (120 rads). LD50/60 approximately 2.5 to 5 Gy (250 to 500 rads).
    2) Lymphocytes are the most radiosensitive blood cell line and are the first to be depleted, followed by granulocytes and platelets. Mature erythrocytes are depleted at a much slower rate (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    3) Early effects of radiation exposure noted in the hematopoietic syndrome are not the result of hematopoietic stem cell loss, but early onset of symptoms reflects the severity of exposure; the earlier symptoms occur and the more severe the symptoms, the greater the radiation exposure received (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    4) Later effects of exposure are due to hematopoietic stem cell loss and reflect the impact on immunity and blood cell production. Infections develop, bleeding occurs, and wound healing is poor; death may occur from weeks to months following radiation exposure (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    b) COMBINED INJURY: Patients with combined injuries (trauma, thermal, chemical injury, and radiation exposure) may develop immunosuppression, delayed healing, and pancytopenia (Berger, 2003).
    c) INFECTION: An infection may occur secondary to pancytopenia. The patient becomes most susceptible to infection in the second to third week postexposure when the maximum decrease in the WBC count occurs.
    1) For patients with multiple injuries who have survived more than five days, infection is the second most common cause of death. Gram-negative bacteria or endotoxin is most commonly responsible (Conklin et al, 1983).
    B) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) Thrombocytopenia generally occurs by 3 to 4 weeks after midlethal-range doses and results from the killing of stem cells and immature megakaryocyte stages, with subsequent maturational depletion of functional megakaryocytes. After sublethal radiation, regeneration of thrombocytopoiesis usually lags behind both erythropoiesis and myelopoiesis (Jarrett, 1999). The platelet count is of little value in the first few days postexposure; however, it should be followed to plan supportive therapy over several weeks to two months postexposure (Natl Acad Sci, 1963; Andrews & Cloutier, 1965).
    C) RETICULOCYTE COUNT ABNORMAL
    1) RETICULOCYTOPENIA: The absence of reticulocytes in the first 3 to 5 days postexposure indicates the patient received a high dose (Natl Acad Sci, 1963; Andrews & Cloutier, 1965).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CUTANEOUS RADIATION SYNDROME (CRS): Exposure to radiation can damage the basal cell layer of skin, resulting in inflammation, erythema, and dry or moist desquamation. Epilation may occur when hair follicles are damaged. A transient and inconsistent erythema and pruritus may occur within a few hours of exposure. Patients may develop intense reddening, blistering, and ulceration of the irradiated site during a latent phase that lasts from a few days up to several weeks. Although healing can occur, very large doses can cause permanent hair loss, damage sebaceous and sweat glands, atrophy, fibrosis, decreased or increased skin pigmentation, and ulceration or necrosis of the tissue. Patients may develop skin damage without ARS following radiation dose to the skin, especially after acute exposures to beta radiation or X-rays (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005; Gottlober et al, 2000).
    b) The guideline for grading cutaneous radiation injury from the US CDC: Grade I: greater than 2 Gy; Grade II: greater than 15 Gy; Grade III: greater than 40 Gy (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    c) LOCAL RADIATION INJURY
    1) Presentation of local radiation injury defined by dose received (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) 3 Gy: Epilation (hair loss) begins 14 to 21 days after exposure.
    b) 6 Gy: Erythema that may be transient soon after exposure (primary erythema), may again appear 14 to 21 days following exposure (secondary erythema). It may also occur from time to time.
    c) 10 to 15 Gy: Dry desquamation is the response of the germinal epidermal layer that is seen 20 days after exposure. Mitotic activity slows in the basal and parabasal layers, the epidermis thins, and large flakes of skin desquamate.
    d) 20 to 50 Gy: Wet desquamation occurs as a partial thickness injury. There is intracellular edema, a coalescence of vesicles forming macroscopic bullae, and fibrin coating a wet dermal surface. Radionecrosis may develop as the dose increases.
    e) Greater than 50 Gy: Damage to endothelial cells and fibrinoid necrosis of the vasculature cause radionecrosis and ulceration.
    d) Partial body exposure to beta- and gamma-radiation, as often happens in accidents, can involve up to 50% of total body surface area with lesions including telangiectasias, hemangiomas, radiation ulcers and keratoses, splinter hemorrhages, hematolymphangiomas, hyperpigmentation, and fibrosis (Peter et al, 1994).
    e) CASE REPORT: A male industrial radiographer, exposed to iridium-192 sources ranging from 10 to 25 Ci in torch type containers from 1974 to 1983, then exposed to iridium-192 from wind-out remotely operated sources through 1988, initially complained of dermatitis of the right index finger in 1984. By 1988, the finger was noted to be sclerotic with telangiectasia and ulcerations of the fingernail. The remaining fingernails were abnormal with linear streaks and a ragged free margin. Skin biopsy of the right index finger revealed keratin thickening with parakeratosis and acanthosis with irregular downgrowths of the basal layer. Amputation of the finger was necessary. It was estimated that this worker was exposed to a total average whole body dose of at least 10 Gy over several years of gamma radiation. Myelodysplasia progressing to acute myeloid leukemia was the eventual cause of death (Lloyd et al, 1994).
    f) Physicians occupationally exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation had morphological and function alterations of the fingernail-fold dermal microcirculation as compared to unexposed controls (Tomei et al, 1996).
    g) Iridium-192 exposure in industrial radiologists may cause radiodermatitis with epidermal necrosis, erythema, nail plate loss, intense local pain with a burning sensation, ulcerations, keratotic lesions, and in rare cases the need for digit amputation (Conde-Salazar et al, 1986).
    B) THERMAL BURN
    1) THERMONUCLEAR DETONATION: Immediate onset of thermal burns of the skin will occur. Thermal radiation causes burns in two ways: by direct absorption of the thermal energy through exposed surfaces (flash burns) or by the indirect action of fires caused within the environment (flame burns). Exposed skin absorbs the infrared; light colors will reflect the infrared and dark colored clothing will absorb it and cause burn patterns. Loose, light colored clothing can reduce the effective range, producing partial thickness burns and giving significant protection against thermal flash burns (Jarrett, 1999). Mortality of thermal burns significantly increases with concomitant radiation doses as small as 1.5 Gy.
    2) RADIATION EXPOSURE: The onset of skin burns from radiation devices or secondary to beta particle contamination is usually delayed for several days. The possibility of beta burns, which produce damage to the basal stratum of the skin, can be minimized by early vigorous decontamination procedures ((Anon, 2000); Andrews & Cloutier, 1965).
    a) CASE REPORTS: A radiation accident occurred during a military exercise when 11 soldiers were accidentally exposed to cesium-137 and developed acute radiation syndrome. Sharply demarcated red macules in various body areas occurred during the prodromal stage. Two weeks later, ulcers, contaminated with bacteria, appeared in the regions of the initial erythema. Ulcers measured up to 10 cm in diameter. In 7 of the 11 patients, ulcers reached down to the muscles. Cutaneous radiation fibrosis was diagnosed in 1 patient. Dermal histologic examination revealed dermal necrosis and cellular detritus in all 11 patients (Gottlober et al, 2000).
    C) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute radiation dermatitis secondary to x- or gamma-ray exposure is most often seen after radiation therapy.
    b) PEMPHIGUS: Pemphigus lesions may develop in patients treated for cancer with ionizing radiation (Correia et al, 1998).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TREMOR
    1) Muscle tremor occurs following massive radiation exposure (Natl Acad Sci, 1963).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) FINDING OF THYROID FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Radiation therapy-associated thyrotoxicosis of either the hypothyroid or hyperthyroid type can occur and may involve an organ-specific autoimmune mechanism (Katayama et al, 1986).
    b) In survivors of the Nagasaki, Japan atomic bomb detonation, there was a significant dose-response relationship between ionizing radiation exposure and thyroid diseases including cancer, adenoma, adenomatous goiter, thyroid nodules, and antibody-positive spontaneous hypothyroidism (Nagataki et al, 1994).
    c) A significant increase in thyroid autoimmunity was found 6 to 8 years after the Chernobyl accident in children (n=495) exposed to radioactive fallout. The autoimmune response was limited to an increased prevalence of circulating thyroid autoantibodies without evidence of significant thyroid dysfunction. No significant changes of serum FT-4, FT-3, or TSH were noted (Pacini et al, 1998).
    d) Childhood thyroid carcinoma was reported with an increased incidence rate, especially in the youngest children, since the nuclear reactor accident at Chernobyl in 1986. One study analyzed the association between disease severity (TNM classification) and age at radiation exposure. They found the severity of disease was associated inversely with age at the time of radiation exposure (Farahati et al, 2000).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Four major effects of ionizing radiation on the fetus include: growth retardation; severe congenital malformations (including errors of metabolism); embryonic, fetal, or neonatal death; and carcinogenesis. Fetal risk is noted at exposures above 10 rem. In early pregnancy, fetal death may occur. Later in pregnancy, radiation exposure may be teratogenic or may cause fetal growth retardation.
    B) Occupational limits: Fetal dose (declared pregnancy): 0.5 rem (5 mSv). Although radiation doses to the embryo or fetus in the uterus is lower than the doses to its mother, health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation in human embryo and fetus can be severe, even at radiation doses too low to immediately affect the mother. Low-level ionizing radiation does not appear to increase the risk of teratogenicity. Consider doses of radioactive materials in specific fetal organs or tissues (eg, iodine-131 or iodine-123 in thyroid; iron-59 in the liver; gallium-67 in the spleen, strontium-90 and yttrium-90 in the skeleton). Approximately 5 Gy (500 rads) dose before 18 weeks' gestation can kill 100% of human embryos or fetuses; 50% of embryos may die with a fetal dose of 1Gy (100 rads).
    C) Cesium has been shown to penetrate the human placenta and be present in breast milk in mothers following exposures.
    D) Impaired fertility, including abnormal sperm production and impaired sexual function, has been reported in men. It is possible that radiation exposure in women may affect the viability of the ova and the function of the endocrine system which is responsible for production of some female sex hormones.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) GENERAL INFORMATION
    1) Four major effects of ionizing radiation on the fetus include: growth retardation; severe congenital malformations (including errors of metabolism); embryonic, fetal, or neonatal death; and carcinogenesis. The most pronounced permanent growth retardation occurs following irradiation in the fetal period. Functional impairment is also described in the literature. When the fetus is irradiated during organogenesis, the peak incidence of teratogenesis occurs. In humans, radiation-induced malformations of bodily structures other than the CNS are uncommon. The mechanism of neurological defects may involve radiation-induced cell death (Jarrett, 1999).
    2) Although radiation doses to the embryo or fetus in the uterus is lower than the doses to its mother, health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation in human embryo and fetus can be severe, even at radiation doses too low to immediately affect the mother. Initially, all sources (external or internal) of radiation to the mother's body should be considered. The fetal radiation dose should be estimated. Ingested or inhaled radioactive substances can be absorbed in the mother's bloodstream (or entered through a contaminated wound) and pass the placental barrier. Certain substances, such as iodine which is needed for growth and development, can be found in larger concentrations in the fetus than in maternal tissues. Maternal tissues around the uterus may contain radioactive substances that can irradiate the fetus (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    B) ANNUAL REGULATORY LIMITS (US NRC)
    1) US NRC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    2) Occupational limits: Fetal dose (declared pregnancy): 0.5 rem (5 mSv) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    C) ICRP GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
    1) ICRP: The International Commission on Radiological Protection
    2) Occupational limits: Fetal dose (declared pregnancy - remainder of pregnancy): 0.1 rem (1 mSv) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    D) FETAL DOSES
    1) Consider doses of radioactive materials in specific fetal organs or tissues (eg, iodine-131 or iodine-123 in thyroid; iron-59 in the liver; gallium-67 in the spleen, strontium-90 and yttrium-90 in the skeleton) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    2) To evaluate fetal doses from internal uptakes, you can refer to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report No. 128. "Radionuclide Exposure of the Embryo/Fetus" (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    3) To estimate fetal dose from medical exposures to pregnant women, refer to "Publication 84: Pregnancy and Medical Radiation" from the International commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    4) Other sources are the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc, (CRCPD), Radiation Control/Radiation Protection contact information (http://crcpd.org/Radon.asp) AND the Health Physics Society (HPS) to obtain a list of active certified Health Physicists (http://www.hps1.org/aahp/members/members.htm) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    5) Prenatal radiation exposure can result in immediate effects (eg, fetal death or malformations) or increased risk for cancer later in life. The potential noncancer health risks of prenatal radiation exposure have been provided by CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) ACUTE RADIATION DOSE TO THE EMBRYO OR FETUS: Less than 0.05 Gy (5 rads): Noncancer health effects not detectable.
    b) ACUTE RADIATION DOSE TO THE EMBRYO OR FETUS: 0.05 to 0.5 Gy (5 to 50 rads):
    1) Blastogenesis (up to 2 weeks): Incidence of failure to implant may increase slightly, but surviving embryos will probably have no significant (noncancer) health effects.
    2) Organogenesis (2 to 7 weeks): Incidence of major malformations may increase slightly; possible growth retardation.
    3) Fetogenesis (8 to 15 weeks): Possible growth retardation; reduction in IQ possible (up to 15 points, depending on dose); incidence of severe mental retardation up to 20%, depending on dose.
    4) Fetogenesis (16 to 25 weeks): Noncancer health effects unlikely.
    5) Fetogenesis (26 to 38 weeks): Noncancer health effects unlikely.
    c) ACUTE RADIATION DOSE TO THE EMBRYO OR FETUS: Greater than 0.5 Gy (50 rads); acute radiation syndrome may develop in the mother with this dose:
    1) Blastogenesis (up to 2 weeks): Incidence of failure to implant will likely be large depending on the dose, but surviving embryos will have no significant (noncancer) health effects.
    2) Organogenesis (2 to 7 weeks): Incidence of miscarriage may increase; substantial risk of major malformations such as neurological and motor deficiencies; growth retardation likely.
    3) Fetogenesis (8 to 15 weeks): Incidence of miscarriage probably will increase; growth retardation likely; reduction in IQ possible (greater than 15 points, depending on dose); incidence of severe mental retardation greater than 20%, depending on dose; incidence of major malformations will probably increase.
    4) Fetogenesis (16 to 25 weeks): Incidence of miscarriage may increase; growth retardation possible; reduction in IQ possible, depending on dose; severe mental retardation possible; incidence of major malformations may increase.
    5) Fetogenesis (26 to 38 weeks): Incidence of miscarriage and neonatal death will probably increase, depending on dose.
    6) Approximately 5 Gy (500 rads) dose before 18 weeks' gestation can kill 100% of human embryos or fetuses; 50% of embryos may die with a fetal dose of 1Gy (100 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    E) RISK OF CANCER FROM PRENATAL EXPOSURE
    1) Radiation dose: No radiation exposure above background (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 0.3%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 38%
    2) Radiation dose: 0 to 0.05 Gy (0 to 5 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 0.3% to 1%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 38% to 40%
    3) Radiation dose: 0.05 to 0.5 Gy (5 to 50 rads)(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 1% to 6%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 40% to 55%
    4) Radiation dose: Greater than 0.5 Gy (50 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: Greater than 6%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): Greater than 55%
    5) Note: The estimated lifetime risks of cancer listed above have been obtained from Japanese males exposed at age 10 years (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation published models). In animal studies, a strong sensitivity to carcinogenic effects was observed in late fetal development, but the stages of blastogenesis and organogenesis were not found to be susceptible (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    F) CONGENITAL ANOMALY
    1) Prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation is well known to induce birth defects in humans, as documented in the children of pregnant atomic bomb detonation survivors (Otake & Schull, 1998; Brent, 1989).
    2) CASE REPORT: Two children conceived while their mothers were undergoing I-131 therapy for thyroid cancer were born with fatal birth defects (Smith et al, 1994).
    G) DOWN SYNDROME
    1) An increased prevalence of Down syndrome (trisomy 21) has been suggested, but not confirmed, to be associated with periods of increased environmental ionizing radiation (Bound et al, 1995; Verger, 1997).
    2) A cluster of DOWN SYNDROME (trisomy 21) cases was seen in the Lothian region of Scotland in 1987, temporally associated with the Chernobyl incident in April, 1986. This was unlikely to have been due to chance, but could not be readily explained by the documented low radiation exposure in that region (Ramsay et al, 1991). A significant increase in cases of Down syndrome was noted in Germany after the Chernobyl disaster, with the highest rates in the most contaminated regions (Sperling et al, 1991).
    H) MENTAL DEFICIENCY
    1) Exposures in the range of 0.01 to 0.1 gray (Gy) may produce mental retardation and increase the risk for childhood cancers. No gross malformations seem to occur at exposures less than about 0.05 Gy (REPROTOX , 1999). The developing central nervous system may be the most sensitive target for the effects of ionizing radiation, with the critical period being between weeks 10 and 17 of pregnancy (Mole, 1985; Cockerham & Prell, 1989).
    2) Studies of the offspring of pregnant atomic bomb survivors have found mental retardation at exposures of less than 0.05 gray (Gy), with NO APPARENT THRESHOLD (Otake & Schull, 1998). The probability of mental retardation in this population was 40% per gray of fetal tissue dose (Otake & Schull, 1984). Expressed another way, there was a reduction of 21 to 29 IQ points per Gy of exposure (Miller, 1990). The frequency of mental retardation increased from a background of 0.8% to 46% with prenatal exposure to 1 Gy or greater in children of atom bomb detonation survivors (Ikenoue et al, 1993). Special note should be made of the fact that these were acute exposures, which in general have more severe biological effects than equivalent doses delivered over a longer period of time.
    3) COHORT STUDY: In a cohort of 888 children whose mothers were exposed to ionizing radiation from atom bomb detonations, those who were exposed at 8 to 15 weeks postovulation had significantly worse scores on repetitive action tests. Those exposed at 0 to 7 weeks postovulation had decreased IQs. These effects were not seen in children whose mothers were exposed at weeks 16 to 25 postovulation. (Yoshimaru et al, 1995).
    4) Severe mental retardation has been described in children exposed in utero to ionizing radiation from atomic bomb detonations at gestation ages 8 to 15 weeks (Mole, 1990).
    I) MICROCEPHALY
    1) Reports on atomic bomb survivors indicate that microcephaly may result from a free-in-air dose of 100 to 190 milliGrays (Jarrett, 1999).
    2) Exposures greater than 2 gray (Gy) can cause microcephaly and severe mental retardation. The critical dose and period of exposure for microcephaly is at least 0.10 to 0.19 Gy at 4 to 17 weeks, and for mental retardation is at least 0.2 to 0.4 Gy at 8 to 15 weeks (Miller, 1990).
    J) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) LOW-LEVEL IONIZING RADIATION
    a) Nuclear power industry workers exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation do not appear to have an increased risk of having a liveborn child with a congenital anomaly (Green et al, 1997).
    b) Offspring of men and women occupationally exposed to low-level ionizing radiation were studied to determine any increased risk of congenital malformations. No evidence of a link between exposure before conception and increased risk of adverse reproductive outcome was noted in men (n=11,697) or women (n=1903) (Doyle et al, 2000).
    K) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Many similar effects in the offspring have been produced in laboratory animals, such as low birth weight and behavioral changes including hyperactivity (Norton, 1986). In experimental animal studies, induction of structural malformations has been seen, but these are lacking in exposed humans (Mole, 1987).
    2) MICE: Fetal Swiss albino mice had different effects from a single 0.5 gray (Gy) dose of gamma radiation given at different times of gestation. Dosing during the preimplantation period increased prenatal mortality. Exposure between days 2 and 4 produced increased resorptions. Dosing between days 9 and 13 resulted in small heads, low brain weight, and microphthalmia (Devi & Baskar, 1996).
    3) MICE: Prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation produced an increased risk of cancer and reproductive defects in mice. Female mice exposed to 1.0 and 2.7 gray (Gy) of Cf(252) and Co(60) in utero had an increased incidence of tumors of the pituitary gland, mammary gland, liver, and lung for up to two years; as well as dysfunctional ovaries (Nitta et al, 1992).
    4) MICE: Maternal-mediated neonatal and developmental toxicity developed in mouse pups after maternal intake of cesium in drinking water (Messiha, 1994).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) FETAL RISK
    1) Fetal risk is noted at exposures above 10 rem. In early pregnancy, fetal death may occur. Later in pregnancy, radiation exposure may be teratogenic or may cause fetal growth retardation (Medical Response Subcommittee of the National Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee, 2009).
    B) PATERNAL PRECONCEPTIONAL IRRADIATION STILLBIRTHS
    1) In one study, stillbirths were reported among offspring of male radiation workers (paternal preconceptional irradiation) at a nuclear reprocessing plant. A point estimate range of 0 to 31.9 (95% confidence limits) stillbirths (n=130) was calculated. These estimates are stated to be qualitatively consistent with animal models (Parker et al, 1999). However, in a letter from another researcher who quantitatively compared animal studies to the radiation workers at the nuclear reprocessing plant, a point estimate of 0.1 stillbirth caused by paternal preconceptional irradiation is suggested (Selby, 2000).
    C) SPONTANEOUS ABORTION
    1) Increased incidences of spontaneous abortions and toxicosis of pregnancy have been seen following maternal radiation exposure, especially in women affected by the Chernobyl incident (Lieberman et al, 1990).
    D) OTHER
    1) Commercial and military flight crew members have exposure to cosmic radiation greater than that of the general public, which may be of concern during pregnancy (Geeze, 1998).
    E) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) The reproductive risk from therapeutic doses of I-131 are low: in 3 studies there were no excess malformations, stillbirths, or early deaths (Dottorini, 1996).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Cesium has been shown to penetrate the human placenta and be present in breast milk in mothers following exposures (Messiha, 1994).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) SPERM PRODUCTION
    1) At exposures less than 5 to 10 rads, effects on male reproduction are not well understood. X-rays at doses as low as 15 rads can temporarily depress sperm production. At doses of 50 rads, there is temporary elimination of sperm production, and at doses of 236 to 365 rads, damage to sperm production can persist for months. Exposure to greater than 400 rads can cause complete and permanent damage to sperm production.
    B) IMPAIRED SEXUAL FUNCTION
    1) Of twelve men with chronic radiation dermatitis after the Chernobyl incident, all had impaired sexual function including impotence, aspermia, azoospermia, abnormal sperm shapes, decreased plasma testosterone levels, increased follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, and decreased luteinizing hormone (LH) levels (Birioukov et al, 1993).
    C) REPRODUCTION EFFECTS
    1) Female reproduction can be affected by ionizing radiation, which alters the viability of ova and can disrupt the function of the endocrine system which produces female sex hormones. Human oocytes may be more resistant to ionizing radiation than those of laboratory animals.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Ionizing radiation has carcinogenic effects in many tissues. The major toxicity of low- and moderate-dose ionizing radiation is cancer induction. Acute ionizing radiation exposure survivors have increased long-term cancer risks. A dose-response relationship exists between exposure to ionizing radiation and the risk for the subsequent development of cancer.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) RISK OF FUTURE CANCER
    1) The risk of future fatal cancer is estimated as being approximately 4% per 100 rem of radiation absorbed. Therefore, a dose of 5 rems increases the risk by about 0.2% and a dose of 25 rems increases the risk by about 1%. The risk of a hereditary disorder per rem approximates 10% of the fatal cancer risk (Medical Response Subcommittee of the National Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee, 2009). The risk of a hereditary disorder to a population that received high doses of radiation is approximately 0.4% per 100 rem or 4% per Sv (Medical Response Subcommittee of the National Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee, 2009).
    2) The increase in risk of childhood cancers is approximately 0.6% per 10 rem exposure (Medical Response Subcommittee of the National Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee, 2009).
    B) RISK OF CANCER FROM PRENATAL EXPOSURE
    1) Radiation dose: No radiation exposure above background (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 0.3%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 38%
    2) Radiation dose: 0 to 0.05 Gy (0 to 5 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 0.3% to 1%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 38% to 40%
    3) Radiation dose: 0.05 to 0.5 Gy (5 to 50 rads)(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: 1% to 6%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): 40% to 55%
    4) Radiation dose: Greater than 0.5 Gy (50 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006):
    a) Estimated childhood cancer incidence: Greater than 6%
    b) Estimated lifetime cancer incidence (exposure at age 10): Greater than 55%
    5) Note: The estimated lifetime risks of cancer listed above have been obtained from Japanese males exposed at age 10 years (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation published models) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
    C) ATOMIC BOMB SURVIVORS
    1) GENERAL
    a) Survivors of acute exposures have long-term risks, as seen in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. There is a dose-response relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer risk. Radiation-induced tumors among atomic bomb detonation survivors include acute leukemia, thyroid cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, and skin cancer (Shintani et al, 1997). The major toxicity of low- and moderate-dose ionizing radiation is cancer induction (Schneider & Burkart, 1998; Broerse & Dennis, 1990; Chau, 1987). There is a significantly reduced risk of developing cancer with increasing age at the time of exposure (Little et al, 1998).
    b) There is a radiation dose dependence in all atomic bomb-related cancers, but the shape of the dose-response curves differs with different cancers. This suggests that the mechanism(s) of radiation-induced cancers is complex. Although dosimetry is still being refined, the risk of developing cancer was generally significant if the dose was 100 rads or greater. There is a published report documenting the first 30 years of follow-up of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors (Okada, 1975).
    c) LEUKEMIA
    1) Leukemias were the first evident cancers in atomic bomb survivors, with incidence peaking 7 to 8 years after exposure. The incidence of both acute and chronic leukemias was elevated, except for the notable absence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The peak onset for acute leukemias was age-dependent, with incidence reaching a maximum at an age corresponding to approximately 1.5 times the age of the subject at the time of exposure. The time of onset for chronic leukemias did not have such a striking age effect; the difference in time of onset for different age groups was only about 3 years. The incidence of all leukemias has subsided with time, but it is not clear if the risk for leukemia has declined to background values (Little, 1993).
    a) With the decline of leukemias, the onset of other types of cancer has become apparent in atomic bomb survivors. To date, there is a clearly increased risk for cancers of the thyroid, breast (female), and lung. Stomach cancer and cancers of the salivary gland are suspected but not yet confirmed. In contrast to the leukemias, the time of onset for breast cancer has not been earlier than expected. Rather, breast cancer has appeared at a higher, dose-related frequency at the ages when it usually occurs (Little, 1993).
    b) All of these cancers exhibit a radiation dose dependence, but the shape of the dose-response curves differs for different cancers, suggesting that the mechanism(s) of radiation-induced cancers is complex and perhaps different for different cancers. Although the dosimetry is still being refined, in general the risk for cancer was significant if the dose was 1 gray (Gy) or greater. There is a published report documenting the first 30 years of follow-up of this population (Okada, 1975).
    2) Deaths from cancer in relation to radiation exposure have been analyzed in the UK National Registry for Radiation Workers. Significant elevation was seen for leukemias (excluding chronic lymphatic). Resulting lifetime risk was 10.0% per sievert (Sv) for all cancers, and 0.76% per Sv for leukemia (excluding chronic lymphatic). These risks are somewhat higher than those proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. There was no association seen with prostate cancer (Kendall et al, 1992).
    3) Based on a case control study of 35,949 children diagnosed with cancer together with matched controls, the hypothesis of paternal preconception irradiation being a cause of childhood leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma was NOT supported (Draper et al, 1997).
    a) These findings are refuted by researchers who suggest that consideration was not given to the possibility of internal radioisotopes exposure being responsible for some cancers (Busby & Cato, 1998). The findings are also refuted by researchers who suggest that effects of population mixing may be diluted in the workers described in the study (Alexander, 1998).
    d) MENINGIOMA
    1) There is a dose-response effect in atomic bomb detonation survivors with meningioma. Incidence of meningioma increased between 1975 and 1994 in survivors of the Hiroshima atomic bomb detonation (Shintani et al, 1997).
    e) MUCOEPIDERMOID TUMORS
    1) In the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb detonation survivors followed by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 145 tumors of the salivary glands were identified. Frequency of mucoepidermoid tumors was disproportionately high at higher radiation doses (p=0.04). Frequency of Warthin tumor increased with increasing radiation dose (p=0.06). A causal role is suggested for ionizing radiation in salivary gland tumorigenesis (Saku et al, 1997).
    D) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES
    1) GENERAL
    a) In a study of 95,673 nuclear industry workers in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, there was no association between radiation dose and all causes of cancer deaths. Among workers in this cohort, females represented less than 15% and mean cumulative radiation dose was 7.5 times less than that of men. Mortality from multiple myeloma and leukemias (except chronic lymphocytic leukemia) was significantly related to radiation doses. Of 119 leukemia deaths in this cohort, 6 were in workers with cumulative exposures in the 400-millisievert range. In these workers, there was a significantly increased risk of developing leukemia at relatively low ionizing radiation doses and a dose-related increased multiple myeloma mortality (Cardis et al, 1995).
    b) In a mortality study of 15,727 white male workers at the United States Los Alamos National Laboratory hired between 1943 and 1977, statistically positive dose-related trends were found for development of Hodgkin disease, malignant brain tumors, and esophageal cancers. The brain tumors reported as the cause of death may have been metastatic rather than primary tumors (Wiggs et al, 1994).
    c) In a cohort analysis to evaluate occupational exposure to uranium and vanadium, the incidence of mortality from all malignant neoplasms was less than expected and there were nonsignificant increases in mortality from trachea, bronchus, and lung cancer, and lymphatic and hematopoietic malignancies in 1484 uranium mill workers employed in 1 of 7 uranium mills for at least 1 year on or after January 1, 1940. Overall, mortality from all cancers was highest among those workers with the shortest duration of employment and lowest among those with the longest duration of employment. However, firm conclusions regarding the association between occupational exposure from uranium mills and the incidence of mortality from various cancers cannot be established due to limitations of the analysis. Limitations included the small cohort size, limited power to detect a moderately increased risk for some outcomes of interest, the inability to estimate individual exposures, and the lack of smoking data (Pinkerton et al, 2004)
    2) BRAIN TUMORS
    a) In a nested case-control study of United States Air Force personnel, there was no association between development of brain tumors and ionizing radiation exposure (Grayson, 1996).
    3) BREAST CANCER
    a) In a case-control study of breast cancer and employment practices among female radiologic technologists (n=over 105,000), there was no significant increase in breast cancer with occupational ionizing radiation exposure found when breast cancer cases (n=528) were compared with approximately 5 control subjects each (n=2628) (Doody et al, 1995).
    b) In a health survey of 79,016 female certified radiologic technologists, employment in this profession was not found to increase the risk of developing breast cancer (Boice et al, 1995).
    4) LEUKEMIA
    a) In a cancer mortality study of 8997 male employees of Atomic Energy of Canada, workers exposed to external low-linear-energy transfer ionizing radiation had a positive dose-related association between exposure and death from leukemia. However, this was based on only 4 deaths (Gribbin et al, 1993).
    5) LUNG CANCER
    a) No significant association was found between development of lung cancer and ionizing radiation exposure in a retrospective cohort study of 5657 workers of the former Spanish Nuclear Energy Board (Junta de Energia Nuclear) carried out between 1954 and 1992. In this cohort, there was excess mortality due to malignant brain tumors (6 observed cases) (Rodriquez Artalejo et al, 1997).
    6) STOMACH CANCER
    a) A cohort study of 58,677 miners employed at a uranium company in East Germany for at least 6 months between 1946 and 1989 found a positive trend between exposure to low-linear energy transfer (low-LET) radiation and stomach cancer (excess relative risk/Gray (ERR/Gy)=1.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 2.78) and a statistically significant increased relative risk (RR) for the highest category of low-LET radiation cumulative dose greater than or equal to 250 milligray (mGy) compared with the reference category of 0 mGy (RR=1.73; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.36) based on 592 deaths from stomach cancer. However, after adjusting for cumulative fine dust exposure, alpha radiation, and arsenic dust, no statistically significant trend was observed for absorbed dose from low-LET radiation (ERR/Gy=0.30; 95% CI, -1.26 to 1.87), alpha radiation (ERR/Gy=22.5; 95% CI, -26.5 to 71.5), and fine dust (ERR/dust-year=0.0012; 95% CI, -0.0020 to 0.0043). There was a non-linear increased risk of stomach cancer with arsenic exposure. After adjusting for cumulative absorbed dose from alpha and low-LET radiation and fine dust, a 2.1-fold higher RR (95% CI, 0.9 to 3.3) was present in the highest exposure category of greater than 500 dust-years compared with 0 dust-years. Limitations of the study were lack of data on potential confounders, including Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, smoking, socioeconomic status, and other occupational exposures (eg, asbestos, diesel engine exhaust), as well as an uncertainty in exposure assessment, such as from possibly drinking arsenic-containing water (Kreuzer et al, 2012).
    E) COMMUNITY-BASED EXPOSURES
    1) Increased occurrence of childhood and adult thyroid cancer has been documented with a 4 to 5 year latency in Belarus, the Ukraine, and the United States following releases of iodine-131 from the Chernobyl disaster, distant United States nuclear weapons plants, United States atmospheric atomic weapons detonations, and a release from the Millstone nuclear power plant in the United States(Mangano, 1996; Hamilton et al, 1987).
    a) In a cohort of 2473 persons potentially exposed to fallout from United States nuclear weapons testing, a statistically significant excess of thyroid neoplasms (both benign and malignant) was found, although only 19 persons developed these tumors (Kerber et al, 1993).
    2) In a community-based health survey from 1944 to 1995 involving 801 individuals who had lived downwind (downwinders) from a United States plutonium production facility located in Hanford, Washington, 294 residents (36.7%) reported at least one type of cancer compared with 43 of 423 individuals (10.2%) in a control group of patients from a medical practice in Portland, Oregon. The most commonly occurring cancers among the downwinders included breast cancer (n=53; 10.2%), thyroid cancer (n=33; 4.1%), colon cancer (n=30; 3.7%), and CNS neoplasms (n=20; 2.5%). Comparison of the incidence of thyroid cancer within this population with other populations exposed to radioactive fallout showed the incidence rates from other populations were considerably lower than those for the downwinders. The crude incidence rate (cancers per 100,000 persons per year) for the downwinders study population was 82.4% (n=33) compared with 8% for the Chernobyl population of 4 Russian regions (n=3004/3,113,000). It is speculated that the increased incidence rates for the downwinders may be associated with continuous environmental contamination of radioactive iodine as well as a longer follow-up period (50 years) compared with the population involved with the Chernobyl accident (12 years) (Grossman et al, 2003).
    3) Possible excesses of childhood cancers have been reported in populations living near nuclear installations in Britain, particularly in Sellafield, Seascale, Dounreay, Aldermaston, Burghfield, and Harwell (Gardner, 1991; Wakeford, 1995). These associations have been reviewed from historical and analytical perspectives and an association between paternal preconception exposure and childhood leukemia was only found at Seascale (Wakeford, 1995). Some in-depth reviews conclude that childhood and adult cancer rates are NOT increased in populations living near normally-operating nuclear plants (Boice & Lubin, 1997; Wakeford & Berry, 1996).
    a) Paternal preconception exposure to internal or external ionizing radiation was NOT an important risk factor for childhood cancers in children whose fathers were employed as radiologists, surgeons, veterinarians, dental surgeons, or industrial radiographers (Sorahan & Roberts, 1993; Sorahan et al, 1995; Wakeford & Berry, 1996).
    F) RISK TO OFFSPRING
    1) Paternal exposure to ionizing radiation may be associated with an increased risk of cancer in the offspring. Development of leukemia in British children in the Sellafield area has been associated with paternal exposure to whole-body penetrating ionizing radiation (Gardner, 1991).
    2) Besides being associated with an increased risk for mental defects, prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation also increases the risk of childhood cancer, primarily in the first 10 years of life (Mole, 1987).
    G) PANCREATIC CANCER
    1) Ionizing radiation was identified as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in a nationwide case control study in Finland (Kauppinen et al, 1995).
    2) In a retrospective study, an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma, but not squamous cell carcinoma, was associated with prior therapeutic radiation (Karagas et al, 1996).
    H) LEUKEMIA
    1) In a cohort study of over 46,000 children of nuclear industry employees, fewer than 3 leukemias could potentially be attributed to offspring of male employees who had accumulated a preconceptual dose of greater than 100 millisieverts. No significant trends were discovered between increasing radiation dose and leukemia. Findings suggest that the incidence of cancer and leukemia among children of nuclear industry workers is similar to that in the general population (Roman et al, 1999).
    2) In a population-based cohort study of 3877 commercial jet cockpit crew, crew members flying over 5000 hours were reported to have significantly increased frequency of acute myeloid leukemia (5.1 times that expected). Increased risk of melanoma (2.4 times that expected) was also found among crew flying more than 5000 hours but the authors concluded that this was related to sun exposure not flying (Gundestrup & Storm, 1999).
    3) A study of United States radiology technologists found the relative risks for non-chronic lymphocytic leukemia was increased 6.6-fold for those working 5 or more years before 1950 and 2.6-fold for those holding patients 50 or more times for x-ray examinations. Working as a radiology technologist was not associated with the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or multiple myeloma (Linet et al, 2005).
    4) In stratified case-cohort of 2558 uranium miners, a relative risk of 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1 to 2.78) was reported for all leukemias in workers with high radon exposure (110 working level months (WLM); 80th percentile) compared with low radon exposure (3 WLM; 20th percentile) and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.59) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The relative risks for myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma were elevated but not statistically significant; multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were not associated with radon (Rericha et al, 2006).
    5) CASE REPORT: An industrial radiographer, determined to have been overexposed to gamma radiation (at least 10 gray (Gy) over 14 years), developed myelodysplasia which progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. Exposure was due to iridium-192 sources, ranging from 10 to 25 Ci, in torch type containers. A principal gamma ray emission of 320 keV is reported from iridium-192, and it has a half-life of 74 days (Lloyd et al, 1994).
    a) Bone marrow examination revealed hypogranular myelopoiesis, pelger-huet forms, and 20% blasts. Abundant micro-megakaryocytes were present with megaloblastic erythropoiesis. Postmortem examinations by ESR of tooth and bone specimens provided evidence that the patient had been excessively irradiated (Lloyd et al, 1994).
    I) BREAST CANCER
    1) A dose-dependent increased risk for breast cancer was seen in relation to exposure to low-linear energy transfer ionizing radiation in a large cohort of 31,917 Canadian women exposed to fluoroscopy during treatment for tuberculosis between 1930 and 1952. The results were consistent with those of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors (Howe & McLaughlin, 1996).
    2) MALE BREAST CANCER: The incidence of breast cancer was studied in 45,880 male atomic bomb survivors diagnosed between January 1, 1958 and December 31, 1998. Nine exposed patients were diagnosed with male breast cancer compared with 3 non-exposed individuals diagnosed with male breast cancer, indicating a statistically significant dose-response relationship reported between exposure to ionizing radiation and the development of male breast cancer (Ron et al, 2005).
    J) CANCER RISK
    1) In a multinational retrospective study of 407,391 workers monitored for external radiation, the estimate of relative risk (RR) per sievert for all cancers excluding leukemia was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14 to 1.97). RR for leukemia, excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia was 1.93 (95% CI, less than 0 to 8.47) and for solid cancers was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.03 to 1.88) (Cardis et al, 2005).
    K) AGE AT EXPOSURE AND MORTALITY
    1) A study of age at exposure and cancer mortality was conducted in workers at the United States Department of Energy Hanford Site. There was little association between mortality and cumulative doses of ionizing radiation accrued at ages 15 to 34 years, 35 to 44 years, and 45 to 54 years. For cumulative doses accrued at 55 years and older (10-year lag), the estimated excess relative risk per sievert was 9.05 (90% confidence interval (CI), 2.96 to 17.92) for lung cancer and 3.24 (90% CI, 0.8 to 6.17) for all cancers (Wing & Richardson, 2005).
    L) PLUTONIUM-RELATED MORTALITY
    1) At the United States Department of Energy Hanford Site, the relationship between length of exposure to plutonium and death rates from cancer was studied. For workers 50 years and older, the death rate increase per year was 2.6 +/- 2% for all cancer, 4.9 +/- 3.3% for cancers of tissues where plutonium deposits, 7.1 +/- 3.4% for lung cancer, and 5.9 +/- 4.8% for digestive cancer (Wing et al, 2004).

Genotoxicity

    A) Ionizing radiation is genotoxic and causes breaks in the structure of DNA, resulting in mutations or chromosomal structural aberrations. Double strand breaks in the mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of radiation have been reported. Incorrectly rejoined break leads to DNA mis-repair which in turn leads to DNA deletions and rearrangements. Large scale changes in DNA structure appear to be typical of most radiation-induced mutations.
    B) CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS
    1) Hospital workers exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation had 13 and 11 times greater frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes compared with unexposed controls. Workers were exposed to mean x-ray doses of 1.84 millisieverts/yr and 1.67 millisieverts/yr for 3 to 20 years. These workers had a higher frequency of chromosomal gaps and breaks, endoreduplications, hyperdiploidies, and chromosomal loss (Paz-y-Mino et al, 1995).
    2) Nuclear medicine and radiology hospital workers had a mean group frequency of chromosomal aberrations (chromosomal gaps and breaks) in peripheral lymphocytes significantly higher than that of unexposed controls (Hagelstrom et al, 1995).
    3) The frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral lymphocytes of hospital radiodiagnostic, radiotherapy, and nuclear medicine employees was greater than in controls. There were no significant differences between exposed and control groups in the frequency of chromatid gaps and breaks, while significant differences were noted for acentric fragments with or without chromosomal gaps and breaks and total structural aberrations (Barquinero et al, 1993).
    4) The was a statistically significant increased total aberration frequency in peripheral lymphocytes in a small group of civilian air crew members compared with controls (Romano et al, 1997). Air crew members are presumed to have increased exposure to cosmic radiation than the general public because of more time spent at high altitudes during flight (Zwingmann et al, 1998) Okansen, 1998; (Friedberg et al, 1989).
    5) Two years after total-body or total-body plus partial-body exposure to gamma radiation from an accident in Estonia, 5 persons had a stable level of translocations present in peripheral blood lymphocytes (Lindholm et al, 1998).
    6) In 100 medical workers exposed to x-rays, there was no time-dependent recovery of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes (Kasuba et al, 1998).
    7) Children exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation from the Chernobyl disaster had more acentric fragments in peripheral blood lymphocytes than did control subjects, but there were no significant differences in chromosome or chromatid breaks (Grollino et al, 1998).
    8) Chromosome aberrations in Norwegian reindeer following the Chernobyl accident (radiocesium exposure) appeared to affect mainly calves during the immediate post-accident period in the highest radiation fallout areas (Roed & Jacobsen, 1995).
    9) Increased chromosomal aberrations, especially acentric fragments, were found in lymphocytes from hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (1.6 to 42.71 millisieverts). No dose-effect relationship was seen (Barquinero et al, 1993). In a group of 47 children exposed to radiation in the Chernobyl incident, low frequencies of chromosome aberrations were evident several years later (Padovani et al, 1993).
    10) Chromosomal translocations in persons who lived in houses (up to 16 years) in Taiwan contaminated with cobalt-60 has been reported. Compared with controls (no exposure to cobalt-60), the overall translocation yield in the residents was 5 times higher. Chromosomes 2, 4 and 12 were affected in 500 metaphases per person. The FISH method for reciprocal chromosomal translocations was used (Chen et al, 2000).
    C) MUTAGENICITY
    1) Japanese atomic bomb survivors have been followed for possible heritable effects from acute ionizing radiation exposure. Even in this population, no clearly demonstrable induced heritable defects have been found (Otake & Schull, 1984). No significant differences in mutation rates in DNA repetitive sequences were found in children of atomic bomb survivors whose parents received a mean gonadal dose of 1.9 sieverts, in comparison with unexposed controls (Satoh et al, 1996).
    2) Workers exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation had increased frequencies of hprt-mutated lymphocytes and changed CD4/CD8 lymphocyte subset ratios (Siefert et al, 1993). A 4.6-fold increase in hprt mutations in blood cells was seen in Brazilian children exposed to 15 to 70 centi-gray units (cGy) during a radiological accident (Saddi et al, 1996). A doubling dose of 173 (+/- 47) cGy was seen for inducing hprt mutation and micronuclei in victims of a Cs-137 radiological accident in Goiania, Brazil (Dacruz et al, 1997).
    3) Persons living near a uranium processing site did not have increased frequencies of mutated somatic cells, as measured by hprt mutations, loss of glycophorin A alleles, or micronuclei (Wones et al, 1995).
    4) Increased glycophorin A mutations were seen in former Australian uranium miners 30 years after last exposure (Shanahan et al, 1996).
    5) Human cells containing mutant p53 proteins did not have delayed cell replication after irradiation; this is consistent with the occurrence of mutated p53 proteins in some cancers (Zolzer et al, 1995). In related studies, cells from patients with ataxia telangiectasia (AT) had a reduced or delayed increase in p53 protein after gamma-irradiation (Birrell & Ramsay, 1995). Cells from persons heterozygous for AT had an intermediate response. Cells from most breast cancer patients were essentially normal in their response, but 18% of the patients responded in the range of AT heterozygotes. This test of p53 induction may be useful in identifying persons at increased risk of DNA-damaging effects of ionizing radiation (Birrell & Ramsay, 1995). AT is a heritable disease characterized by increased radiation sensitivity and risk for cancer.
    6) In limited studies, the serum of persons exposed to ionizing radiation contains clastogenic factors, which have persisted for over 30 years in A-bomb survivors. Such factors have been found in dose-related levels in the serum of 33 of 47 recovery workers from the Chernobyl incident (Emerit et al, 1995).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs and repeat every 2 hours for symptomatic patients.
    B) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count, then every 4 hours for the first 8 hours, then every 6 hours for the subsequent 40 to 48 hours, then daily. Lymphocyte kinetics and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are sensitive indicators of radiation dose.
    C) Monitor for presence of sepsis or opportunistic infections, particularly in the presence of bone marrow depression and loss of intestinal mucosa.
    D) A baseline serum amylase level should be obtained to evaluate for parotitis; repeat in 24 hours. Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Electrolyte levels should be obtained when necessary.
    E) Obtain blood and tissue typing, if the examination suggests a high-dose exposure. These patients may need bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or peripheral stem cells due to pancytopenia.
    F) If the history indicated possible inhalation or ingestion of radioactive materials, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained for analysis, using any properly labeled sealed container. In addition, if inhalation may have occurred, nasal swabs should be obtained from each nostril, the amount of radiation in each should be measured with a handheld counter, and the 2 counts should be added. This amount divided by 0.1 provides a useful approximation of the inhaled dose, and this result can be compared with available tables that indicate the Annual Limit on Intake to determine if treatment is required (www.orise.orau.gov/reacts).
    G) Cytogenetic dosimetry, the gold standard method of measurement, should be ordered and obtained after 24 hours to determine the actual dose absorbed by the patient. However, there are only 2 laboratories in the United States that perform cytogenetic dosimetry and results are not available for a few days.
    H) Monitor for neurological symptoms, including a steadily deteriorating state of consciousness with coma and/or seizures during the neurovascular syndrome following very high acute radiation doses.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) HEMATOLOGIC
    1) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count, then every 4 hours for the first 8 hours, then every 6 hours for the subsequent 40 to 48 hours, then daily. Lymphocyte kinetics and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are sensitive indicators of radiation dose (Donnelly et al, 2010; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) LYMPHOCYTES: Absolute count is an early indicator of dose; greater than 1500/mm(3) at 48 hours postexposure indicates insignificant exposure; less than 1000/mm(3) at 24 hours or less than 500/mm(3) at 48 hours postexposure indicates severe exposure. A 50% drop in lymphocytes within 24 hours indicates significant radiation injury. Early therapy usually prevents nearly all deaths from marrow injury alone (Jarrett, 1999).
    a) CHROMOSOMES: An analysis of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes is commonly used to assess radiation dose. Even in partial-body exposures, chromosome damage can be an excellent indicator of the absorbed dose (Jarrett, 1999).
    3) Monitor for presence of sepsis or opportunistic infections, particularly in the presence of bone marrow depression and loss of intestinal mucosa.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) OTHER
    a) VITAL SIGNS
    1) Monitor vital signs and repeat every 2 hours for symptomatic patients (Berger, 2003).
    b) SERUM AMYLASE
    1) A baseline serum amylase level should be obtained to evaluate for parotitis; repeat in 24 hours. Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Maximum amylase levels are seen with exposures between 400 and 1000 rads (4 to 10 Gy). Electrolyte levels should be obtained when necessary (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Berger, 2003).
    c) BLOOD AND TISSUE TYPING
    1) Obtain blood and tissue typing, if the examination suggests a high-dose exposure. These patients may need bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or peripheral stem cells due to pancytopenia (Berger, 2003).
    d) URINALYSIS
    1) If the history indicated possible inhalation or ingestion of radioactive materials, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained for analysis, using any properly labeled sealed container (Berger, 2003).
    e) NASAL SWABS
    1) If inhalation may have occurred, nasal swabs should be obtained from each nostril, the amount of radiation in each should be measured with a handheld counter, and the 2 counts should be added. This amount divided by 0.1 provides a useful approximation of the inhaled dose, and this result can be compared with available tables that indicate the Annual Limit on Intake to determine if treatment is required (www.orise.orau.gov/reacts) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    f) DOSIMETRY
    1) Cytogenetic dosimetry, the gold standard method of measurement, should be ordered and obtained after 24 hours to determine the actual dose absorbed by the patient. However, there are only 2 laboratories in the United States that perform cytogenetic dosimetry and results are not available for a few days. Cytogenetic dosimetry is based on the predictable and standardized effects that radiation has on replication of DNA in a culture of lymphocytes (Donnelly et al, 2010; Koenig et al, 2005).
    g) MENTAL STATUS
    1) Monitor for neurological symptoms, including a steadily deteriorating state of consciousness with coma and/or seizures during the neurovascular syndrome following very high acute radiation doses (Jarrett, 1999).
    h) OTHER LABS
    1) The following labs may be obtained, if available (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    2) Blood FLT-3 ligand concentrations: Marker for hematopoietic damage
    3) Blood citrulline: Reduced citrulline concentration indicates gastrointestinal damage
    4) Interleukin-6 (IL-6): Increases with dose
    5) Quantitative G-CSF: Increases with dose
    6) C-reactive Protein (CRP): Increases with dose; may distinguish between minimally and heavily exposed patients
    7) Cytogenetic studies with overdispersion index
    i) BIOMARKERS
    1) F-ratio: The F-ratio is the ratio between interchromosomal and intrachromosomal exchange type chromosomal aberrations (Sasaki et al, 1998). An F-ratio of 6 is characteristic of prior exposure to densely ionizing radiation (Brenner & Sachs, 1994).
    2) Chromosomal type aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes may be a useful biomarker in hospital workers exposed to ionizing radiation (Bonassi et al, 1997).
    3) Stable chromosome-type aberrations are a more sensitive indicator of chronic ionizing radiation exposure than is glycophorin A (GPA) analysis of variant erythrocytes in nuclear power workers (Tucker et al, 1997). In Chernobyl "liquidators" who later immigrated to Israel, glycophorin A antigen tests discriminated between these ionizing radiation-exposed workers and non-exposed persons (Goldsmith et al, 1997).
    4) Micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes significantly increase with exposure to 0.3 to 5 Gy of x-rays (Streffer et al, 1998). Automated assays can be done for this endpoint and if only B-lymphocytes are used, a radiation dose of only 0.1 Gy of x-rays can be detected (Streffer et al, 1998). Workers exposed to radiative tritium in luminous paint or in the nuclear weapons industry also have an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes (Joksic & Spasojevic-Tisma, 1998).

Radiographic Studies

    A) RADIOGRAPHIC-OTHER
    1) BONE SCAN: Three-phase bone scanning is a helpful means of evaluating radiation-injured tissues in patients with local radiation injury. The scan can be used to assess the vascularity of the region, the extent of the injury, and the appropriate level for amputation (Mettler et al, 1987).
    B) MRI
    1) Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in detecting radiation injury to the brain because of its extreme sensitivity to white matter edema (Curnes et al, 1986).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Admission is required for fluid and electrolyte therapy if severe vomiting and diarrhea are present. Patients manifesting thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia, and/or lymphopenia require hospital admission. Hospital admission is also necessary for standard indications for multiple trauma or burns associated with radiation exposure.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any patient who is asymptomatic, totally decontaminated as indicated by survey, and has a normal CBC and platelet count may be safely discharged. Follow-up instructions should include a repeat CBC in 48 hours and reevaluation following the onset of any gastrointestinal symptoms (eg,) nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) For patients with localized injury, referral is sometimes required for plastic surgery, grafting, or amputation (Koenig et al, 2005)
    6.3.1.4) PATIENT TRANSFER/ORAL
    A) Initially, patients should be field-triaged to a facility designated for handling radioactively-contaminated patients. Other conditions (eg, multiple trauma) may necessitate transporting patients to a trauma center.
    B) After stabilization, decontamination, and initial evaluation, patients with the hematopoietic syndrome should be transferred to a facility with expertise in the treatment of pancytopenia (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011). If transfer is indicated, it should be undertaken on the first day or as soon as possible (Berger, 2003).

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs and repeat every 2 hours for symptomatic patients.
    B) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count, then every 4 hours for the first 8 hours, then every 6 hours for the subsequent 40 to 48 hours, then daily. Lymphocyte kinetics and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are sensitive indicators of radiation dose.
    C) Monitor for presence of sepsis or opportunistic infections, particularly in the presence of bone marrow depression and loss of intestinal mucosa.
    D) A baseline serum amylase level should be obtained to evaluate for parotitis; repeat in 24 hours. Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Electrolyte levels should be obtained when necessary.
    E) Obtain blood and tissue typing, if the examination suggests a high-dose exposure. These patients may need bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or peripheral stem cells due to pancytopenia.
    F) If the history indicated possible inhalation or ingestion of radioactive materials, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained for analysis, using any properly labeled sealed container. In addition, if inhalation may have occurred, nasal swabs should be obtained from each nostril, the amount of radiation in each should be measured with a handheld counter, and the 2 counts should be added. This amount divided by 0.1 provides a useful approximation of the inhaled dose, and this result can be compared with available tables that indicate the Annual Limit on Intake to determine if treatment is required (www.orise.orau.gov/reacts).
    G) Cytogenetic dosimetry, the gold standard method of measurement, should be ordered and obtained after 24 hours to determine the actual dose absorbed by the patient. However, there are only 2 laboratories in the United States that perform cytogenetic dosimetry and results are not available for a few days.
    H) Monitor for neurological symptoms, including a steadily deteriorating state of consciousness with coma and/or seizures during the neurovascular syndrome following very high acute radiation doses.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) The history obtained at the scene is of great importance. The exact type of exposure (ie, internal versus external and partial versus whole body exposure) should be obtained. If exposure is internal, both the route of entry (oral, inhalation, contaminated open wounds) and the specific radioactive material(s) should be determined. Monitoring exposed patients for contamination and decontamination procedures should be started. All personnel involved in handling patients should wear disposable protective clothing. The patient should be completely undressed and given a soap and water bath or shower (if the patient's condition permits and if the facility exists).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Gastric lavage may be used if ingestion occurred within 1 to 2 hours, and large ingestions may benefit from cathartics and enemas (Koenig et al, 2005). All emesis should be collected for the first few days, saving for later analysis (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) In-vitro studies comparing radioactive cesium binding to activated charcoal and sodium polystyrene sulfonate failed to demonstrate any significant binding at 3 different pHs investigated. In-vitro tests were also performed comparing soluble and insoluble Prussian blue binding to radioactive cesium. On a molar basis, binding capacity at pH 7.5 was 264 mg/mmol insoluble Prussian blue and 27 mg/mmol soluble Prussian blue. Further animal testing with insoluble Prussian blue is needed before this can be recommended for decontamination of ingested cesium-137 (Verzijl et al, 1992).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Stabilize all patients from their traumatic injuries prior to evaluating them for radiation injuries. Although high intensity external radiation can cause tissue damage (eg, skin burns or marrow depression), it does not make the patient radioactive (Koenig et al, 2005). However, all staff should be in scrubs covered with a water resistant gown or a Tyvek(R) suit. A cap, mask, and shoe covers should be worn, and 2 pairs of plastic gloves worn with the first pair taped to the gown or suit. Dosimeters should be worn at the collar but under the protective clothing (Berger, 2003).
    2) EXTERNAL DECONTAMINATION: Before evaluation, steps should be taken to decontaminate the patient, which is largely accomplished by removing and bagging the clothing, and washing the skin with warm water and soap. Any embedded metal particles should be removed with forceps and stored away from people, in a shielded area (Berger, 2003). The dose of radiation should be estimated, supportive care and symptomatic treatment begun, and fluid and electrolyte correction provided as needed (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    3) RADIATION INFORMATION: Several historical points should be quickly obtained when whole-body irradiation is a possibility: (1) location when the potential exposure occurred; (2) amount of possible shielding, including position inside a building; (3) amount of time outside away from shielding; and (4) occurrence of any vomiting or diarrhea. It should be documented whether any decontamination has occurred, and if any loss of consciousness was experienced. If trauma occurred, the mechanism of injury should be determined, and any medication use and allergy history recorded (Berger, 2003).
    4) EXAMINATION/MONITORING: The main goals of therapy for acute radiation syndrome are prevention of neutropenia and sepsis (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    a) Other important actions include (1) patient's weight should be measured and monitored to guide fluid replacement; (2) vital signs, including temperature, should be recorded as temperature may increase and hypotension may develop with increasing dose of radiation; (3) focused physical examination should be performed; (4) any occurrence of vomiting or diarrhea, erythema of the skin or mucosa, headache, abdominal cramps, unusual fatigue, parotitis, or nausea should be noted; and (5) any alteration in CNS function should be noted, with trauma ruled out as the cause (Berger, 2003).
    b) The physical examination should be repeated at 6 hours and 12 hours after the initial examination, monitoring the temperature since the sooner the temperature rises, the greater the dose received (Berger, 2003).
    c) Trauma or other urgent medical or surgical situations should be managed prior to treatment for radiation exposure (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    5) INGESTION: Patients who ingested any radioactive matter should receive aluminum hydroxide or magnesium carbonate antacids to reduce absorption (Koenig et al, 2005). Treat patients with persistent nausea and vomiting with granisetron or ondansetron. Early oral feedings are recommended to maintain gut function (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011). All emesis should be collected for the first few days, saving for later analysis (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005). Antidiarrheals may be used to control diarrhea (Berger, 2003). Internal contamination may require treatment with radiation countermeasure agents such as potassium iodide (radioactive iodine exposure), prussian blue (cesium and thallium exposure), or chelating agents (plutonium, americium, curium exposure). However, these agents do not protect against external radiation absorption and acute radiation syndrome (Koenig et al, 2005).
    6) MYELOSUPPRESSION: Colony-stimulating factor treatment should begin within 24 to 72 hours of exposure when granulocyte levels are falling, with daily therapy continued until the absolute neutrophil count increases to more than 1000 cells/mm(3). Patients who develop infection without neutropenia should have antibiotic therapy directed towards the source of infection and the most likely pathogen (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Koenig et al, 2005; Goans & Waselenko, 2005).
    7) LOCALIZED RADIATION INJURY: Localized radiation injury may also occur in conjunction with acute radiation syndrome, usually presenting with delayed erythema and desquamation or blistering 12 to 20 days after exposure. Treatment includes pain management, infection prevention, and vasodilators (Koenig et al, 2005).
    8) PALLIATIVE CARE: Patients who vomited within a few minutes of exposure, with diarrhea developing in less than an hour, fever developing in less than 1 hour, severe headache, a possible history of loss of or altered consciousness, abdominal pain, parotid pain, erythema, and possible hypotension have likely received a lethal dose with poor prognosis. Palliative care should be started immediately, with initial treatment in the ICU if resources allow (Berger, 2003).
    9) Further information is available from the CDC (http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/) and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.remm.nlm.gov/). Emergency consultation services are also available through the Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 865-576-1005 (http://orise.orau.gov/reacts/) (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs and repeat every 2 hours for symptomatic patients.
    2) Obtain a baseline CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count, then every 4 hours for the first 8 hours, then every 6 hours for the subsequent 40 to 48 hours, then daily. Lymphocyte kinetics and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are sensitive indicators of radiation dose.
    3) Monitor for presence of sepsis or opportunistic infections, particularly in the presence of bone marrow depression and loss of intestinal mucosa.
    4) A baseline serum amylase level should be obtained to evaluate for parotitis; repeat in 24 hours. Exposures above 0.5 Gy (50 rads) will result in a significant elevation of serum amylase. Electrolyte levels should be obtained when necessary.
    5) Obtain blood and tissue typing, if the examination suggests a high-dose exposure. These patients may need bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or peripheral stem cells due to pancytopenia.
    6) If the history indicated possible inhalation or ingestion of radioactive materials, a 24-hour urine collection should be obtained for analysis, using any properly labeled sealed container. In addition, if inhalation exposure may have occurred, nasal swabs should be obtained from each nostril, the amount of radiation in each should be measured with a handheld counter, and the 2 counts should be added. This amount divided by 0.1 provides a useful approximation of the inhaled dose, and this result can be compared with available tables that indicate the Annual Limit on Intake to determine if treatment is required (www.orise.orau.gov/reacts).
    7) Cytogenetic dosimetry, the gold standard method of measurement, should be ordered and obtained after 24 hours to determine the actual dose absorbed by the patient. However, there are only 2 laboratories in the United States that perform cytogenetic dosimetry and results are not available for a few days.
    8) Monitor for neurological symptoms, including a steadily deteriorating state of consciousness with coma and/or seizures during the neurovascular syndrome following very high acute radiation doses.
    C) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) Treat patients with persistent nausea and vomiting with granisetron or ondansetron. Early oral feedings are recommended to maintain gut function (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) ONDANSETRON
    a) ADULTS: Initial: 0.15 mg/kg IV OR a continuous IV dose of 8 mg, followed by 1 mg/hour for the next 24 hours OR 8 mg orally every 8 hours as needed (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    b) CHILDREN (less than 4 years): (less than 0.3 m(2)), 1 mg orally 3 times daily as needed; (0.3 to 0.6 m(2)), 2 mg orally 3 times daily as needed; (0.6 to 1 m(2)), 3 mg orally 3 times daily as needed; (greater than 1 m(2)), 4 to 8 mg orally 3 times daily as needed (Gunn et al, 2002).
    c) CHILDREN (4 to 11 years): 4 mg orally 3 times daily as needed (Gunn et al, 2002).
    d) CHILDREN (12 years or older): 8 mg orally every 8 hours as needed (Gunn et al, 2002).
    3) GRANISETRON
    a) ADULTS: 10 mcg/kg IV OR 1 mg orally initially, repeated in 12 hours or 2 mg as one dose (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    D) DIARRHEA
    1) For control of diarrhea, drugs such as loperamide or diphenoxylate/atropine are recommended (Berger, 2003).
    2) LOPERAMIDE
    a) ADULTS: 4 mg orally initially, then 2 mg after each loose stool to maximum of 16 mg daily (Prod Info loperamide hcl oral capsules, 2005)
    b) CHILDREN (2 to 5 years; 13 to 20 kg): 1 mg orally 3 times daily, up to 3 mg daily (Prod Info loperamide hcl oral capsules, 2005)
    c) CHILDREN (6 to 8 years; 20 to 30 kg): 2 mg orally twice daily, up to 4 mg daily (Prod Info loperamide hcl oral capsules, 2005)
    d) CHILDREN (8 to 12 years; greater than 30 kg): 2 mg orally 3 times daily, up to 6 mg daily (Prod Info loperamide hcl oral capsules, 2005)
    3) DIPHENOXYLATE/ATROPINE
    a) ADULTS: 2 tablets or 10 mL oral solution 4 times daily orally until control obtained, then reduce dose to individual necessity; maximum 20 mg/day diphenoxylate (Prod Info LOMOTIL(R) CV oral tablets, oral liquid, 2005)
    b) CHILDREN: 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg/day orally, given in 4 divided doses; maximum 20 mg/day diphenoxylate (Prod Info LOMOTIL(R) CV oral tablets, oral liquid, 2005)
    E) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Three recombinant colony-stimulating factors are approved for use in chemotherapy patients who experience neutropenia from myelosuppression: filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim. All are endogenous glycoproteins that stimulate progenitor cells to grow in number and differentiate into mature blood cells (Koenig et al, 2005). Filgrastim and its pegylated form, pegfilgrastim, are granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) and sargramostim is a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    2) Radiation accident victims have been treated with filgrastim and sargramostim. These are most effective in the setting of radiation sickness when used early in therapy, within 24 to 72 hours postexposure, and continued until the absolute neutrophil count is 1000/mm(3) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011). A proposed set of protocols recommends that colony-stimulating factors be given to patients who are exposed to 3 Gy (300 rad) but are otherwise healthy and also to patients exposed to 2 Gy (200 rad) who have trauma or burn injuries (Koenig et al, 2005).
    3) Patients who received doses of 7 - 10 Gy (700 - 1000 rad) should be considered for bone marrow stem cell transplants. The Radiation Injury Treatment Network was founded to assist in situations in which profound damage to the bone marrow has occurred, and it can be reached at: http://bloodcell.transplant.hrsa.gov/ABOUT/RITN/index.html (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    4) INFECTION: Patients who develop infection without neutropenia should have antibiotic therapy directed towards the source of infection and the most likely pathogen (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Koenig et al, 2005; Goans & Waselenko, 2005). If febrile neutropenia develops, consultation with infectious disease and hematology specialists should be obtained (Donnelly et al, 2010), and guidelines on febrile neutropenia from the Infectious Disease Society of America should be followed for appropriate antibiotic therapy (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    5) If transfusion of blood products is required, all products should be leukoreduced and irradiated to 25 Gy in order to avoid a transfusion-related graft-vs-host reaction (Goans & Waselenko, 2005).
    6) FILGRASTIM
    a) ADULTS: 2.5 to 5 mcg/kg once daily subQ (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    7) SARGRAMOSTIM
    a) ADULTS: 5 to 10 mcg/kg once daily subQ (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    8) PEGFILGRASTIM
    a) ADULTS: 6 mg once subQ (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    F) DRUG THERAPY FINDING
    1) DECORPORATION THERAPY RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Deferoxamine: DFOA; dimercaprol: BAL; pentetate calcium trisodium or pentetate zinc trisodium: DTPA, calcium or zinc; edetate calcium disodium: EDTA; potassium iodide: KI; propylthiouracil: PTU; succimer: DMSA (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    b) ACTINIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    c) AMERICIUM (Am-241)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha
    2) Radiological half-life: 458 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 73000 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, skin wounds
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Lungs, liver, bones, bone marrow
    7) Treatment: DTPA
    d) ANTIMONY
    1) Treatment: BAL (preferred), penicillamine
    e) ARSENIC
    1) Treatment: BAL (preferred), DMSA
    f) BERKELIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    g) BISMUTH
    1) Treatment: BAL, penicillamine, DMSA (preferred)
    h) CADMIUM
    1) Treatment: DMSA (preferred), DTPA, EDTA
    i) CALIFORNIUM (Cf-252)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 2.6 years
    3) Exposure Type: Internal
    4) Mode of contamination: Lungs, GI tract
    5) Focal accumulation in body: Bones, liver
    6) Treatment: DTPA
    j) CESIUM
    1) Treatment: Prussian blue
    k) CESIUM (Cs-137)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 30 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 70 days
    4) Exposure Type: External, internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Lungs, GI tract, wounds, follows potassium
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Renal excretion
    7) Treatment: Prussian blue
    l) CHROMIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA (antacids are contraindicated)
    m) COBALT (Co-60)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 5.26 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 9.5 days.
    4) Exposure Type: External, internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Lungs
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Liver
    7) Treatment: Gastric lavage, DMSA, DTPA (preferred), EDTA, NAC
    n) COPPER
    1) Treatment: EDTA, penicillamine (preferred), trientine
    o) CURIUM (Cm-244)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha, Gamma, Neutron
    2) Radiological half-life: 18 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 7300 days (liver); 18,250 days (bones)
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Liver, bones (soluble curium compounds)
    7) Treatment: DTPA
    p) EINSTEINIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    q) EUROPIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    r) FLUORINE
    1) Treatment: Aluminum hydroxide
    s) GALLIUM
    1) Treatment: Penicillamine
    t) GOLD
    1) Treatment: BAL (preferred), penicillamine
    u) INDIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    v) IODINE (I-131)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 8.1 days
    3) Biologic half-life: 138 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract, wounds
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Thyroid
    7) Treatment: KI (preferred), PTU, methimazole, sodium iodide
    w) IRIDIUM (Ir-191)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 74 days
    3) Biologic half-life: 50 days
    4) Exposure Type: External, internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Not available
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Spleen
    7) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA
    x) IRON
    1) Treatment: DFOA (preferred), deferasirox, DTPA, DFOA and DTPA together
    y) LANTHANUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    z) LEAD
    1) Treatment: DMSA (preferred), EDTA, EDTA with BAL
    aa) MANGANESE
    1) Treatment: DFOA, DTPA (preferred), EDTA
    ab) MAGNESIUM
    1) Treatment: Strontium therapy
    ac) MERCURY
    1) Treatment: BAL (preferred), EDTA, penicillamine, DMSA
    ad) NEPTUNIUM
    1) Treatment: DFOA and/or DTPA
    ae) NICKEL
    1) Treatment: BAL (preferred), EDTA
    af) NIOBIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    ag) PALLADIUM
    1) Treatment: Penicillamine (preferred), DTPA
    ah) PHOSPHORUS (P-32)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta
    2) Radiological half-life: 14.3 days
    3) Biologic half-life: 1155 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract, wounds
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Bones, bone marrow, rapidly replicating cells
    7) Treatment: Lavage, aluminum hydroxide, potassium phosphates, dibasic 250 mg phosphorus per tablet orally; adults: 1 to 2 tabs orally four times daily with full glass of water each time, with meals and at bedtime. children over 4 years of age: 1 tab four times daily
    ai) PLUTONIUM (Pu-239)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha
    2) Radiological half-life: 2.2 x 10(4) years
    3) Biologic half-life: 73,000 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Limited lung absorption, high retention
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Lungs, bones, bone marrow, liver, gonads
    7) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), DFOA, EDTA, DTPA with DFOA
    aj) POLONIUM (Po-210)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha
    2) Radiological half-life: 138.4 days
    3) Biologic half-life: 60 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract, wounds
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Spleen, kidneys, lymph nodes, bone marrow, liver, mucus lining cells of the lung
    7) Treatment: Lavage, BAL (preferred), DMSA, penicillamine
    ak) POTASSIUM
    1) Treatment: Diuretics
    al) PROMETHIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    am) RADIUM (Ra-226)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha, Beta, Gamma
    2) Radiological half-life: 1602 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 16,400 days
    4) Exposure Type: External, internal
    5) Mode of contamination: GI tract
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Bones
    7) Treatment: Magnesium sulfate lavage; ammonium chloride 1 to 2 g four times daily orally for 6 days; calcium generous doses orally; calcium gluconate 5 ampules (500 mg calcium each) IV in 500 mL D5W over 4 hours for 6 days; sodium alginate 10 g powder in a 30 mL vial orally, add water and drink.
    an) RUBIDIUM
    1) Treatment: Prussian blue
    ao) RUTHENIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA
    ap) SCANDIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA
    aq) SODIUM
    1) Treatment: Diuretic and isotopic dilution with 0.9% sodium chloride
    ar) STRONTIUM (Sr-90)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta
    2) Radiological half-life: 28 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 18,000 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Moderate GI tract
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Bones - similar to calcium
    7) Treatment: Stable strontium; aluminum hydroxide 60 to 100 mL orally once; aluminum phosphate gel 100 mL orally once immediately after exposure; ammonium chloride 1 to 2 g four times daily orally for 6 days; calcium generous doses orally; calcium gluconate 5 ampules (500 mg calcium each) IV in 500 mL D5W over 4 hours for 6 days; sodium alginate 10 g powder in a 30 mL vial orally, add water and drink.
    as) SULFUR
    1) Treatment: Sodium thiosulfate
    at) TECHNETIUM
    1) Treatment: Potassium perchlorate
    au) THALLIUM
    1) Treatment: Prussian blue
    av) THORIUM (Th-232)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha
    2) Radiological half-life: 1.41 x 10(10) years
    3) Biologic half-life: 8030 days (bones), 700 days (liver, total body)
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Bones
    7) Treatment: DTPA
    aw) TRITIUM (H-3)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta
    2) Radiological half-life: 12.5 years
    3) Biologic half-life: 12 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract, wounds
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Total body
    7) Treatment: Dilution with controlled water intake, more than 3 to 4 L orally daily for 3 weeks, diuretics
    ax) URANIUM (U-235)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Alpha
    2) Radiological half-life: 7.1 x 10(8) years
    3) Biologic half-life: 15 days
    4) Exposure Type: Internal
    5) Mode of contamination: GI tract
    6) Focal accumulation in body: Kidneys, bones
    7) Treatment: Sodium bicarbonate to alkalinize the urine; dialysis
    ay) YTTRIUM (Y-90)
    1) Ionizing radiation type: Beta
    2) Radiological half-life: 64 hours
    3) Exposure Type: Internal
    4) Mode of contamination: Inhalation, GI tract
    5) Focal accumulation in body: Bones
    6) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA
    az) ZINC
    1) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA, zinc sulfate as a diluting agent
    ba) ZIRCONIUM
    1) Treatment: DTPA (preferred), EDTA
    G) POTASSIUM IODIDE
    1) In the situation of radioactive iodine exposure, potassium iodide (KI) may be given to block thyroid gland uptake of radioactive iodine. KI offers no protection from external irradiation and must be given within a few hours of exposure to have effect. Children are more vulnerable to the effects of radioactive iodine, so that in neonates, infants, and children, as little as 10 milligrays of exposure should prompt use of KI. However, in adults over 40, a thyroid exposure of 5 Gy or greater is required before offering KI (Koenig et al, 2005).
    2) DOSES
    a) ADULTS: 130 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    b) CHILDREN (age 12 to 18 years, weight greater than 150 pounds): 130 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    c) CHILDREN (age 12 to 18 years, weight less than 150 pounds): 65 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    d) CHILDREN (age 3 to 12 years): 65 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    e) CHILDREN (age 1 month to 3 years): 32.5 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    f) CHILDREN (birth to 1 month): 16.25 mg orally daily (Prod Info IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, 2005)
    3) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Patients may be markedly sensitive to iodides; hypersensitivity reactions may occur immediately or hours after administration. Manifestations may include urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, laryngospasm and shock. Iododerma, a reversible rare acneiform or proliferative/ulcerative eruption, has also been reported in patients ingesting potassium iodide, especially in patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma, polyarteritis nodosa, arthritis, and hypocomplementemic urticaria/vasculitis (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2004).
    H) PENTETATE CALCIUM TRISODIUM
    1) FDA-APPROVED USES: Plutonium-239, americium-241, curium-244 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011)
    2) NON-FDA APPROVED USES: Californium-252, thorium-232, yttrium-90 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011)
    3) Ingestion of the transuranic elements plutonium, americium, and curium may be treated with chelating agents, calcium trisodium (Ca-DTPA) and pentetate zinc trisodium (Zn-DTPA), that form stable complexes with the isotope, allowing renal excretion. These agents are given over days, months, or years (Koenig et al, 2005).
    4) DOSE
    a) ADULTS: 1 g in 5 mL IV push over 3 to 4 minutes or IV infusion over 30 minutes diluted in 250 mL of 5% dextrose in water, Normal Saline (NS), or Ringers Lactate. Nebulized inhalation: 1 g in 1:1 dilution with water or NS (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    b) CHILDREN (age under 12 years): 14 mg/kg IV loading dose as soon as possible; MAX: 1 g (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    5) Ca-DTPA is teratogenic and should not be used by pregnant women, particularly if Zn-DTPA is available. Also, during therapy it is important to monitor the levels of trace minerals including magnesium, manganese, and zinc (Koenig et al, 2005).
    I) PENTETATE ZINC TRISODIUM
    1) FDA-APPROVED USES: Plutonium-239, americium-241, curium-244 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011)
    2) NON-FDA APPROVED USES: Californium-252, thorium-232, yttrium-90 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011)
    3) Ingestion of the transuranic elements plutonium, americium, and curium may be treated with chelating agents, calcium trisodium (Ca-DTPA) and pentetate zinc trisodium (Zn-DTPA), that form stable complexes with the isotope, allowing renal excretion. These agents are given over days, months, or years (Koenig et al, 2005).
    4) DOSE
    a) ADULTS: 1 g in 5 mL IV push over 3 to 4 minutes or IV infusion over 30 minutes diluted in 250 mL of 5% dextrose in water, Normal Saline (NS), or Ringers Lactate. Nebulized inhalation: 1 g in 1:1 dilution with water or NS (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    b) CHILDREN (age under 12 years): 14 mg/kg IV loading dose as soon as possible; MAX: 1 g (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    5) During therapy it is important to monitor the levels of trace minerals including magnesium, manganese, and zinc (Koenig et al, 2005).
    J) PRUSSIAN BLUE
    1) USES: Cesium-137, thallium-201, rubidium (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    2) Prussian blue, or ferric hexacyanoferrate, is an insoluble dye that is employed in situations in which radioactive cesium (Cs 134 or Cs 137) or thallium is ingested. It is indicated when the ingested amount exceeds 10 times the annual limit of intake (ALI). The need for the use of prussian blue is controversial when the exposure is between 1 and 10 times. Prussian blue functions by increasing the excretion of the isotope in feces, and it is taken for a minimum of 30 days (Koenig et al, 2005).
    3) DOSE
    a) ADULTS: 3 g orally 3 times daily for ingestion of cesium or thallium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    b) CHILDREN (age 2 to 12 years): 1 g orally 3 times daily for ingestion of cesium or thallium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    K) DEFEROXAMINE
    1) USES: Iron, manganese, neptunium, and plutonium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) DOSE: Not specified by age: 1 g IM or IV (2 ampules) slowly (15 mg/kg/hr); IM is preferred; repeat as indicated as 500 mg IM or IV every 4 hours for 2 doses; then 500 mg IM or IV every 12 hours for 3 days (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    L) DIMERCAPROL
    1) USES: Antimony, bismuth, gold, mercury, lead, arsenic, nickel, polonium-210 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) DOSE: Not specified by age: 300 mg per vial for deep IM use, 2.5 mg/kg (or less) every 4 hours for 2 days, then twice daily for 1 day then once daily for days 5 to 10 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    M) EDETATE CALCIUM DISODIUM
    1) USES: Cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iridium, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, plutonium, ruthenium, yttrium, zinc, zirconium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) DOSE: Not specified by age: 1000 mg/m(2)/day added to 500 mL dextrose 5% normal saline over 8 to 12 hours (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    N) PENICILLAMINE
    1) USES: Antimony, bismuth, copper, gallium, gold, mercury, palladium, polonium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) DOSE: Not specified by age: 250 mg daily orally between meals and at bedtime; may increase to 4 or 5 g daily in divided doses (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    O) PROPYLTHIOURACIL
    1) USES: Iodine-131 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011)
    2) DOSE: Not specified by age: 2 tabs (50 mg each) 3 times daily for 8 days (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011; Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    P) SUCCIMER
    1) USES: Arsenic, bismuth, cadmium, cobalt, lead, mercury, polonium (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) DOSE: CHILDREN: initial, 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) orally every 8 hours for 5 days. Reduce frequency of administration to 10 mg/kg or 350 mg/m(2) every 12 hours (two-thirds of initial daily dose) for an additional 2 weeks of therapy (course of therapy: 19 days) (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    Q) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    R) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) In patients who have inhaled radioactive material, direct measurement of radiation within the patient is possible to guide therapy. Nasal swabs should be taken as soon as possible in order to determine the approximate radiation exposure; combine the 2 measurements and divide by 0.1 to obtain the inhaled amount of radiation. In all cases, the measurements can be converted into a measure of activity and compared with charts of known annual limits of intake to determine if the amount of radiation internally present is hazardous and requires treatment. Specific medical countermeasures may be employed to treat internal contamination, some of which depend on the specific radionuclide that has been inhaled (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    a) Refer to ORAL OVERVIEW AND MAIN SECTIONS for specific treatment information.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) NOTE: More detailed information can be found at US Department of Health and Human Services Decontamination Procedure website: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/ext_contamination.htm (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011).
    a) Obtain an x-ray to rule out presence of shrapnel in globe.
    b) If corneal contamination is present and globe is intact, carefully irrigate eyes with copious amounts of saline or water.
    c) Never irrigate a ruptured globe.
    d) To avoid contamination of nasolacrimal duct, irrigation stream away from inner canthus and toward outer canthus.
    e) Monitor the eyes for conjunctivitis after decontamination.
    f) The irrigation fluid should be tested frequently for residual radioactivity.
    g) Collect, store, and label irrigation fluid properly for forensic evaluation and proper disposal.
    2) Refer to ORAL OVERVIEW AND MAIN SECTIONS for specific treatment information.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) External decontamination should be performed (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    B) Most decontamination (90%) is accomplished by removal of the outer clothing and shoes. A radiation detector passed over the body (held at a consistent distance from the body) can detect residual contamination. Further decontamination is accomplished by washing with warm soap and water, with gentle brushing while covering open wounds. Reduction of radiation to less than 2 times the background level is the goal of decontamination (Koenig et al, 2005).
    C) Contaminated wounds require further effort. Abrasions are decontaminated with warm water and soap. Lacerations may require excision of contaminated tissue. Punctate lesions may be successfully cleaned using a water pick or oral irrigator (Koenig et al, 2005). Shrapnel should be removed with forceps (Berger, 2003).
    D) Excision of radionuclides directly from wounds also serves to decrease radiation exposure (Koenig et al, 2005).
    E) BURNS: In partial-thickness burns, minimize irritation of area by thoroughly irrigating and cleaning with mild solutions. Blisters should be left closed; open blisters should be irrigated and treated as per appropriate burn protocols. Radioactive contaminants will slough in the eschar in full-thickness burns (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Jarrett, 1999).
    F) GROSS WHOLE-BODY DECONTAMINATION
    1) NOTE: More detailed information can be found at US Department of Health and Human Services Decontamination Procedure website: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/ext_contamination.htm (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011).
    a) Remove all of patient's clothing and place all property in a single, airtight labeled bag/container.
    b) Store bags in secure designated location for later forensic evaluation and proper disposal.
    c) Conduct a whole body radiation survey. Refer to: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/howtosurvey.htm
    d) Decontaminate in the following order: whole body, radioactive shrapnel, open wounds, body entrance cavities (nose, mouth, ears), and localized contaminated skin starting with area of highest contamination.
    e) The main goal of whole body external decontamination is to reduce external contamination to a level of no more than 2 times background radiation level.
    1) Two decontamination cycles should be conducted, using a whole body radiation survey after each cycle.
    2) Use tepid water with a mild soap (neutral pH) for decontamination. Avoid cold and hot waters. Cold water can close skin pores and trap radioactive contamination. It can also cause hypothermia. Hot water can cause thermal burns, as well as increase the absorption of radioactive maternal through vasodilation and increased skin blood flow. The rub-off should be directed away from the body.
    3) If the second whole body radiation survey revealed external contamination in excess of 2 times background radiation level, handle patient with standard precautions.
    4) It may be difficult to remove all contamination from skin. It may require normal sloughing (12 to 15 days) for the radioactive material trapped in outer most layer of skin to be removed.
    5) Avoid vigorous decontamination, which may cause the loss of normal intact skin barrier and an increased risk of internal contamination.
    6) Use a waterproof dressings/drapes to cover areas of residual radiation contamination and to limit the spread of contamination to other body sites and immediate environment.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Patients exposed to ionizing radiation may also have received localized exposure that results in localized tissue damage. To be clinically significant, it has been determined that more than 10 cm(2) of the basal layer of the skin has to have been irradiated. The patient history is important in order to recognize radiation burns because there is a delay of days to weeks before clinical manifestations are apparent. The use of serial color photographs of the involved area is recommended (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) The main concerns with radiation injury to the skin are control of infection, aggressive wound care, and pain management. A plastic surgery consult early in the course of care is recommended. Typical care includes (1) topical corticosteroids to control inflammation, (2) hyperbaric oxygen and pentoxifylline or a pentoxifylline-vitamin E preparation, and (3) management of wound and surgical care provided by physicians experienced in the care of chronic vascular injury (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    3) The following medical management of localized radiation injuries have also been reported (Muller & Meineke, 2010):
    a) PAIN: Systemic analgesics and local cooling.
    b) INFLAMMATION: Corticosteroids, panthenol, and antihistamines
    c) WOUND CLEANING AND PREVENTION OF INFECTION: Daily dressings and use disinfectant solutions
    d) IMPROVEMENT OF MICROCIRCULATION: Pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy
    e) HEALING ACCELERATION: Occlusive dressings
    f) TREATMENT OF KERATOSIS: Retinoids
    g) TREATMENT OF ULCERS: Daily dressing and bathing in antiseptic solutions, antibiotics for secondary infections.
    h) REDUCTION OF FIBROSIS: Pentoxifylline, alpha-tocopherol, interferon-gamma.
    i) SURGICAL TREATMENT: Excision, skin grafting, amputation.
    B) BURN OF SKIN
    1) BURNS and RADIATION: Patients with thermal burns and concomitant radiation exposure have a marked increase in mortality. Aggressive marrow resuscitative therapeutic procedures may improve prognosis. The primary cause of death in these patients is infection (Jarrett, 1999).
    2) In partial-thickness burns, minimize irritation of area by thoroughly irrigating and cleaning with mild solutions. Blisters should be left closed; open blisters should be irrigated and treated as per appropriate burn protocols. Radioactive contaminants will slough in the eschar in full-thickness burns (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Jarrett, 1999).
    3) Excision is appropriate when surgically indicated. Radioactive contaminants will be in the wound surfaces and will be removed with the tissue (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011; Jarrett, 1999).
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) In vitro studies have compared charcoal hemoperfusion, prussian blue therapy, and Resonium-A(R) for their abilities to decrease radioactivity in artificial media containing cesium-137. Insoluble Prussian blue was the best of the investigated adsorbents; after the addition of 60 mg to the radionuclide solution, nearly 100% of radioactivity was bound and could be removed. Activated charcoal did not appear to adsorb to and remove radioactive substances. Charcoal hemoperfusion was NOT found to be effective (Verzijl JM, Lie RL & Savelkoul TJ et al, 1990; Verzijl et al, 1992).

Case Reports

    A) CHRONIC EFFECTS
    1) CHERNOBYL: On April 26, 1986, 5 x 10(7) Ci of radionuclides escaped from a damaged nuclear reactor at Chernobyl, Ukraine (Behar et al, 1990).
    2) Four clouds of radioactive particles covered areas including Finland, Sweden, France, Italy, Poland, Turkey, and Greece. The local area, within 18 miles of the reactor, contained 135,000 persons, 24,200 of whom were exposed to more than 0.35 Man-sv. (Note: the Sievert (Sv) is a unit of "dose-equivalent" that accounts for both the energy absorbed and the effectiveness of the pattern of energy absorption for producing biological effects). It is estimated that these people were exposed to an average activity of 600,000 Bq per person in the first 48 hours alone. On the basis of these and other dosage estimates, experts predicted 1,500 deaths from thyroid cancer induced by iodine-131 and an excess of 30,000 to 40,000 cancer deaths from exposure to other radionuclides (Behar et al, 1990).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: UNITS: The basic units of measure of ionizing radiation are the rad and the gray (Gy). One rad equals 0.01 joules of energy deposited per kilogram of tissue. One Gy equals 100 rads or 1 joule per kilogram. One sievert (Sv) is equivalent to 100 rems, where 1 rem is 1 Gy multiplied by a factor that depends on the type of radiation received. For gamma radiation, this factor is 1, so that 1 Sv equals 1 Gy equals 100 rads equals 100 rems. For alpha radiation, the factor is 20, so that 1 rad equals 20 rems (or Sv). The factor is 1 for beta radiation and between 3 and 20 for neutron energy.
    B) Acute radiation syndrome is a symptom complex following whole body irradiation (greater than 1 Gy). It varies in nature and severity, depending upon: (a) dose measured in gray (Gy), (b) dose rate (dose of radiation per unit of time), (c) dose distribution, and (d) individual susceptibility. Whole-body radiation doses can be divided into potentially lethal (2 to 10 Gy), sublethal (less than 2 Gy), and supralethal (greater than 10 Gy) doses.
    1) HEMATOPOIETIC (BONE MARROW) SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads). GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads). NEUROVASCULAR/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME: Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads). CUTANEOUS RADIATION SYNDROME: Presentation of Local Radiation Injury defined by dose received: 3 Gy: Epilation (hair loss) begins 14 to 21 days after exposure. 6 Gy: Erythema that may be transient soon after exposure (primary erythema), may again appear 14 to 21 days following exposure (secondary erythema). It may also occur from time to time. 0 to 15 Gy: Dry desquamation is the response of the germinal epidermal layer that is seen 20 days after exposure. Mitotic activity slows in the basal and parabasal layers, the epidermis thins, and large flakes of skin desquamate. 20 to 50 Gy: Wet desquamation occurs as a partial thickness injury. There is intracellular edema, a coalescence of vesicles forming macroscopic bullae, and fibrin coating a wet dermal surface. Radionecrosis may develop as the dose increases. Greater than 50 Gy: Damage to endothelial cells and fibrinoid necrosis of the vasculature cause radionecrosis and ulceration.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) Without any treatment, 50% of patients exposed to 3.5 Gy (350 rads) will die within 30 days (ie, LD 50/60 equals 350 rads) (Koenig et al, 2005; Berger, 2003; Jarrett, 1999).
    B) Whole-body radiation doses can be divided into potentially lethal (2 to 10 Gy), sublethal (less than 2 Gy), and supralethal (greater than 10 Gy) doses (Toohey, 2003; Jarrett, 1999; Broyles, 1989).
    C) CHRONIC: An industrial radiographer died following at least 14 years of over-exposure to iridium-192 (gamma radiation). It was estimated that he received a total average whole body dose of at least 10 Gy over several years. Death was due to acute myeloid leukemia which occurred as a result of the overexposure (Lloyd et al, 1994).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ANNUAL REGULATORY LIMITS (US NRC)
    1) US NRC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    2) Non-occupational limit (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Members of the public: 0.1 rem (1 mSv)
    3) Occupational limits (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Whole body (internal plus external): 5 rem (50 mSv)
    b) Any individual organ: 50 rem (500 mSv)
    c) Lens of the eye: 15 rem (150 mSv)
    d) Skin: 50 rem (500 mSv)
    e) Extremities: 50 rem (500 mSv)
    f) Fetal dose (declared pregnancy): 0.5 rem (5 mSv)
    B) ICRP GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
    1) ICRP: The International Commission on Radiological Protection
    2) Non-occupational limits (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Whole body (internal plus external): 0.1 rem (1 mSv)
    b) Lens of the eye: 1.5 rem (15 mSv)
    c) Skin: 5 rem (50 mSv)
    3) Occupational limits (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Whole body (internal plus external): 2 rem (20 mSv)
    b) Any individual organ: N/A
    c) Lens of the eye: 15 rem (150 mSv)
    d) Skin: 50 rem (500 mSv)
    e) Extremities: 50 rem (500 mSv)
    f) Fetal dose (declared pregnancy - remainder of pregnancy): 0.1 rem (1 mSv)
    C) MISSION-SPECIFIC RISK-BASED DOSE LIMITS
    1) The following recommendations have been established by US EPA (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) Once-in a lifetime exposure of workers: Up to 10 rem (0.1 Sv) to protect valuable property and up to 25 rem (0.25 Sv) for saving lives. If the responders are not pregnant and are fully aware of the risks, greater than 25 rem (0.25 Sv) may be received for life saving.
    b) Urgent rescue operations: up to 1000 mSv (100 rem).
    D) Acute radiation syndrome is a symptom complex following whole body irradiation (greater than 1 gray (Gy)). It varies in nature and severity, depending upon: (a) dose measured in gray (Gy), (b) dose rate (dose of radiation per unit of time), (c) dose distribution, and (d) individual susceptibility. Whole-body radiation doses can be divided into potentially lethal (2 to 10 Gy), sublethal (less than 2 Gy), and supralethal (greater than 10 Gy) doses (Toohey, 2003; Jarrett, 1999; Broyles, 1989).
    E) Between 0.2 to 2 Gy (20 and 200 rads) of exposure, there is a brief interruption of cellular division and mild, insignificant decreases in cell count; patients may have mild nausea and headache. Acute radiation sickness or syndrome (ARS) is observed following exposure to more than 2 Gy (200 rads)(Donnelly et al, 2010).
    F) HEMATOPOIETIC (BONE MARROW) SYNDROME
    1) Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 0.7 Gy (greater than 70 rads); mild symptoms may develop following doses as low as at 0.3 Gy (30 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    2) The degree to which the lymphocyte count is affected over the first 48 hours postexposure is reflective of the dose of radiation received and provides an indication of the severity of the injury and prognosis (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    a) Most damage is minor in patients exposed to radiation doses less than 1 Gy (100 rad), but subsequent malignant transformation may occur (Koenig et al, 2005).
    b) Most patients exposed to radiation doses greater than 6 to 8 Gy will also have significant blast and thermal injuries (Koenig et al, 2005).
    c) Absolute lymphocyte count within first 48 hours of exposure to acute ionizing irradiation and prognosis (Koenig et al, 2005)
    1) 1000 to 3000 (normal range) = 0 to 0.5 Gy absorbed: No significant injury
    2) 1000 to 1500 = 1 to 2 Gy absorbed: Good prognosis with significant but nonlethal injury
    3) 500 to 1000 = 2 to 4 Gy absorbed: Fair prognosis with severe injury
    4) 100 to 500 = 4 to 8 Gy absorbed: Poor prognosis with very severe injury
    5) Less than 100 = greater than 8 Gy absorbed: Lethality is likely even with stimulation of the hematopoietic system
    G) GASTROINTESTINAL SYNDROME
    1) Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 10 Gy (greater than 1000 rads); some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 6 Gy (600 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    2) Because the time to onset of vomiting after irradiation is related to the radiation dose, this symptom can be used to estimate the dose received, which then serves to guide the timing and intensity of treatment (Donnelly et al, 2010; Koenig et al, 2005). This relationship holds for most patients as the dose increases, until a dose of 1000 rads has been reached, at which point vomiting may be suppressed. Fewer than 50% of patients will vomit after an exposure of 2 to 3 Gy (200 to 300 rads), and at doses of 5 to 6 Gy (500 to 600 rads), up to 90% will vomit (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    a) Estimation of dose received based on time to onset of vomiting after single acute exposure: Less than 10 minutes: greater than 8 Gy (800 rads); less than 30 minutes: 6 to 8 Gy (600 to 800 rads); less than 1 hour: 4 to 6 Gy (400 to 600 rads); 1 to 2 hours: 2 to 4 Gy (200 to 400 rads); more than 2 hours or no vomiting: less than 2 Gy (200 rads) (Donnelly et al, 2010) .
    H) NEUROVASCULAR/CARDIOVASCULAR SYNDROME
    1) Dose (gamma equivalent values): Greater than 50 Gy (greater than 5000 rads). Some symptoms may develop following doses as low as 20 Gy (2000 rads) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).
    2) With exposures over 10 Gy (1000 rads), vomiting is suppressed, but patients are generally more fatigued (known as the 'fatigue syndrome'). Further features include headache, fever, altered reflexes, confusion, disorientation, dizziness, ataxia, and loss of consciousness (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    3) When exposure exceeds 35 Gy (3500 rads), larger blood vessels are damaged, which may cause circulatory collapse and may be associated with increased intracerebral pressure, vasculitis, and meningitis (Donnelly et al, 2010; Koenig et al, 2005). Patients will also experience nausea, vomiting, prostration, hypotension, ataxia, and seizures (Koenig et al, 2005). Exposure to over 50 Gy (5000 rads) will result in death within 48 hours (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    I) LOCAL RADIATION INJURY
    1) The guideline for grading cutaneous radiation injury from the US CDC: Grade I: greater than 2 Gy; Grade II: greater than 15 Gy; Grade III: greater than 40 Gy (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011).
    2) Presentation of local radiation injury defined by dose received (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center, 2011):
    a) 3 Gy: Epilation (hair loss) begins 14 to 21 days after exposure.
    b) 6 Gy: Erythema that may be transient soon after exposure (primary erythema), may again appear 14 to 21 days following exposure (secondary erythema). It may also occur from time to time.
    c) 10 to 15 Gy: Dry desquamation is the response of the germinal epidermal layer that is seen 20 days after exposure. Mitotic activity slows in the basal and parabasal layers, the epidermis thins, and large flakes of skin desquamate.
    d) 20 to 50 Gy: Wet desquamation occurs as a partial thickness injury. There is intracellular edema, a coalescence of vesicles forming macroscopic bullae, and fibrin coating a wet dermal surface. Radionecrosis may develop as the dose increases.
    e) Greater than 50 Gy: Damage to endothelial cells and fibrinoid necrosis of the vasculature cause radionecrosis and ulceration.
    J) CATARACT FORMATION
    1) Deterministic effects for cataract formation are directly dose-dependent. Intensity of the effect is directly related to dose. Ocular cataract formation may begin from 6 months to several years following exposure. The reported threshold for detectable cataract formation is 2 Sieverts for acute gamma radiation doses and 15 Sieverts for protracted doses. All types of ionizing radiation may induce cataract formation, but neutron irradiation is particularly effective in its formation, even at low doses (Jarrett, 1999).
    K) CHRONIC RADIATION SYNDROME
    1) Chronic radiation syndrome may develop in persons exposed to radiation for at least 3 years and who have received at least 1 Gray or more to the marrow. Clinical symptoms are varied and may include sleep and/or appetite disturbances, generalized weakness and fatigability, increased excitability, loss of concentration, impaired memory, mood changes, vertigo, ataxia, paresthesias, headaches, epistaxis, chills, syncopal episodes, bone pain, and hot flashes (Jarrett, 1999).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) ACUTE RADIATION INJURY: Deposition of radiation energy in tissue can cause radiation injury, resulting in free-radical formation and damage to DNA or other cellular structures and processes (Koenig et al, 2005; Conklin et al, 1983). The dose rate, as well as the total radiation dose, may be an important consideration in assessing the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation (Koenig et al, 2005; Toohey, 2003; Broyles, 1989).
    1) The response to exposure to ionizing radiation varies by cell type and is largely a function of the rate of cell replication or the cell cycle length. Cells are most vulnerable to the effects of radiation during mitosis; therefore, the tissue with the most mitotically active cells will be the most damaged. Spermatogonia, the cells of the gastrointestinal tract, and hematopoietic cells such as lymphocytes and erythroblasts are the most sensitive, while collagen-producing cells, muscle cells, and bone cells are less affected since they are not as mitotically active. Thus, the 3 syndromes that result are hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, and neurovascular, based on these decreasing radiation sensitivities. Increasing doses of ionizing radiation lead to increasing damage to the cells that are more radioresistant (Donnelly et al, 2010).
    B) HISTOPATHOLOGIC CHANGES
    1) Histopathologic changes are divided into 3 stages: early (0 to 2 months after radiation therapy), intermediate (2 to 9 months after radiation therapy), and late (greater than 9 months after radiation therapy) (Movsas et al, 1997).
    a) EARLY STAGE: characterized by small vessel and capillary injury with development of vascular congestion and increased capillary permeability. Criteria developed for diagnosis of early stage include: hyaline membranes, swelling and destruction of alveolar lining cells with hyperplasia and atypia, and edema.
    b) INTERMEDIATE STAGE: characterized by platelet, fibrin and collagen obstruction of pulmonary capillaries. Septae have interstitial fibrosis with bands of collagen and alveolar-lining cells become hyperplastic. Alveolar walls become infiltrated with fibroblasts.
    c) LATE STAGE: a chronic stage occurs after severe radiation injury, with a histopathologic appearance of progressive alveolar septal thickening and progressive vascular sclerosis.
    C) CANCER
    1) Radiation exposure leads to DNA breakages, most of which are repaired properly by enzymes. If the cell is still in a dividing phase, repair failures or mistakes may be potentiated in daughter cells and establish a cancerous clone. Some evidence points to a negative effect of radiation on T-lymphocytes, which destroy cancer cells. Radiation may serve as a promoter, causing or speeding development of a cancer in tissue already preconditioned for cancer (Behar et al, 1990).
    D) CELLULAR EFFECTS: The hematopoietic and the gastrointestinal systems are the two most radiosensitive organ systems in the body. Relative sensitivities of an organ to direct radiation injury is dependent on its component tissue sensitivities. Cellular effects, whether due to direct or indirect radiation, are basically the same for various kinds and doses of radiation. The simplest cellular effect is cell death. Changes in cellular function, which occur at lower than lethal cellular radiation doses, may include delays in phases of the mitotic cycle, disruption of cell growth, permeability changes, and changes in motility. Actively dividing cells are most sensitive to radiation. Radiosensitivity tends to vary inversely with the degree of differentiation of the cell ((Anon, 2000)).

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Alexander F: Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers (Letter). Br Med J 1998; 316:1672.
    3) American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology: Academy Position Statement: The risk of severe allergic reactions from the use of Potassium Iodide for radiation emergencies. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Milwaukee, WI. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.aaaai.org/media/resources/academy_statements/position_statements/potassium_iodide.asp. As accessed 2011-03-17.
    4) Andrews GA & Cloutier RJ: Accidental acute radiation injury. Arch Environ Health 1965; 10:498-507.
    5) Anon : Army Field Manual FM 8-10-7. Chapter 2. Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons Effects. U.S. Army. Washington, DC, USA. 2000. Available from URL: http://www.nbc-med.org/SiteContent/ MedRef/OnlineRef/FieldManuals/fm8_107/chapter2.htm. As accessed Accessed July 12, 2000.
    6) Barquinero JF, Barrios L, & Caballin MR: Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 1993; 286:275-279.
    7) Becker DV: Reactor accidents: Public health strategies and their medical implications. JAMA 1987; 258:649-654.
    8) Behar A, Cohen-Boulakia F, & Othmani S: Chernobyl three years later: radiobiologic evaluation of a radioactive contamination. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 1990; 10:281-285.
    9) Berger, ME; Leonard, RB; Ricks, RC; et al: Hospital triage in the first 24 hours after a nuclear or radiological disaster. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Oak Ridge, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://orise.orau.gov/files/reacts/triage.pdf. As accessed 2011-03-17.
    10) Birioukov A, Meurer M, & Peter RU: Male reproductive system in patients exposed to ionizing irradiation in the chernobyl accident. Arch Androl 1993; 30:99-104.
    11) Birrell GW & Ramsay JR: Induction of p53 protein by gamma radiation in lymphocyte lines from breast cancer and ataxia tenangiectasia patients. Br J Cancer 1995; 72:1096-1101.
    12) Boice JD & Lubin JH: Occupational and environmental radiation and cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8:309-322.
    13) Boice JD, Mandel JS, & Doody MM: Breast cancer among radiologic technologists. JAMA 1995; 274:394-401.
    14) Bonassi S, Forni A, & Bigatti P: Chromosome aberrations in hospital workers: evidence from surveillance studies in Italy (1963-1993). Am J Ind Med 1997; 31:353-360.
    15) Bound JP, Francis BJ, & Harvey PW: Down's syndrome: prevalence and ionising radiation in an area of north west England 1957-91. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49:164-170.
    16) Brandom WF: Radiat Res 1978; 76:159-171.
    17) Brenner DJ & Sachs RK: Chromosomal "fingerprints" of prior exposure to densely ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 1994; 140:134-142.
    18) Brent RL: The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to X-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound: Counseling the pregnant and nonpregnant patient about these risks. Seminars in Oncology 1989; 16:347-368.
    19) Broerse JJ & Dennis JA: Dosimetric aspects of exposure of the population to ionizing radiation. Internat J Radiat Biol 1990; 57:633-645.
    20) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    21) Broyles AA: The effect of dose rate on radiation injury. Health Physics 1989; 56:933-937.
    22) Busby C & Cato MS: Exposure to internal radioisotopes may be responsible (Letter). Br Med J 1998; 316:1672-1673.
    23) Cardis E, Gilbert ES, & Carpenter L: Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: Cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res 1995; 142:117-132.
    24) Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al: Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ 2005; 331(7508):77-.
    25) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Acute radiation syndrome: A fact sheet for physicians. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/arsphysicianfactsheet.asp. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    26) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Radiation and pregnancy: A fact sheet for clinicians. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. 2006. Available from URL: http://emergency.cdc.gov/radiation/prenatalphysician.asp. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    27) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    28) Champlin RE, Kastenberg WE, & Gale RP: Radiation accidents and nuclear energy: Medical consequences and therapy. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:730-744.
    29) Chau NP: Radiation carcinogenesis in humans: Is it necessary to revise exposure dose limits based on recent estimates of lifetime risks?. Health Physics 1987; 52:753-761.
    30) Checkoway H: J Occup Med 1985; 27:885-892.
    31) Chen FD, Chen KY, & Ngo FQH: Chromosomal damage in long-term residents of houses contaminated with cobalt-60 (letter). Lancet 2000; 355:726.
    32) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    33) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    34) Christensen J: Two reports warn of radioactive bullets. High Country Times 1993; 25:4.
    35) Cockerham LG & Prell GD: Prenatal radiation risk to the brain. Neurotoxicol 1989; 10:467-474.
    36) Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, & Romero LV: Occupational radiodermatitis from Ir(192) exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15:202-204.
    37) Conklin JJ, Walker RI, & Hirsch EF: Current concepts in the management of radiation injuries and associated trauma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983; 156:809-829.
    38) Correia MP, Santos D, & Jorge M: Radiotherapy-induced pemphigus (Portugese). ACTA Med Port 1998; 11:581-583.
    39) Curnes JT, Laster DW, & Ball MR: Magnetic resonance imaging of radiation injury to the brain. Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7:389-394.
    40) Dacruz AD, Volpe JP, & Saddi V: Radiation risk estimation in human populations -- lessons from the radiological accident in Brazil. Mutat Res 1997; 373:207-214.
    41) Devi PU & Baskar R: Influence of gestational age at exposure on the prenatal effects of gamma-radiation. Internat J Radiat Biol 1996; 70:45-52.
    42) Diffre P: Radionuclides in the environment. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 1990; 10:276-280.
    43) Donnelly EH, Nemhauser JB, Smith JM, et al: Acute radiation syndrome: assessment and management. South Med J 2010; 103(6):541-546.
    44) Doody MM, Mandel JS, & Boice JD: Employment practices and breast cancer among radiologic technologists. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37:321-327.
    45) Dottorini ME: Genetic risk assessment after iodine-131 exposure: an opportunity and obligation for nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:612-615.
    46) Doyle P, Maconochie N, & Roman E: Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study. Lancet 2000; 356:1293-1299.
    47) Draper GJ, Little MP, & Sorahan T: Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: a record linkage study. Br Med J 1997; 315:1181-1188.
    48) Dunn K, Yoshimaru H, & Otake M: Prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation and subsequent development of seizures. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131:114-123.
    49) Edsall K: Radiation exposure, North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology, Orlando, FL, 1999.
    50) Emerit I, Oganesian N, & Sarkisian T: Clastogenic factors in the plasma of Chernobyl accident recovery workers -- anticlastogenic effect of Ginkgo biloba extract. Radiat Res 1995; 144:198-205.
    51) Farahati J, Demidchik EP, & Biko J: Inverse association between age at the time of radiation exposure and extent of disease in cases of radiation-induced childhood thyroid carcinoma in Belarus. Cancer 2000; 88:1470-1476.
    52) Finch SC: Acute radiation syndrome. JAMA 1987; 258:664-667.
    53) Fraser G, Giraudon I, Cohuet S, et al: Epidemiology of internal contamination with polonium-210 in the London incident, 2006. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66(2):114-120.
    54) Friedberg W, Faulkner DN, & Synder L: Galactic cosmic radiation exposure and associated health risks for air carrier crewmembers. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 1104-1108.
    55) Gains M: Radiation exposure. Practitioner 1989; 233:1631-1634.
    56) Gardner MJ: Childhood cancer and nuclear installations. Public Health 1991; 105:277-285.
    57) Geeze DS: Pregnancy and in-flight cosmic radiation. Aviat Space Environ Med 1998; 69:1061-1064.
    58) Gibson PG, Bryant DH, & Morgan GW: Radiation-induced lung injury: A hypersensitivity pneumonitis?. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:288-291.
    59) Goans RE & Waselenko JK: Medical management of radiological casualties. Health Phys 2005; 89(5):505-512.
    60) Goldsmith JR, Merkin L, & Quastel MR: Evaluation of the radiation exposures of Chernobyl "liquidators": Exploratory studies of a sample of immigrants to Israel. Internat J Occup Environ Health 1997; 3:51-59.
    61) Gottlober P, Bezold G, & Weber L: The radiation accident in Georgia: clinical appearance and diagnosis of cutaneous radiation syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42:453-458.
    62) Grayson JK: Radiation exposure, socioeconomic status, and brain tumor risk in the US Air Force: a nested case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143:480-486.
    63) Green LM, Dodds L, & Miller AB: Risk of congenital anomalies in children of parents occupationally exposed to low level ionsing radiation. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54:629-635.
    64) Gribbin MA, Weeks JL, & Howe GR: Cancer mortality (1956-1985) among male employees of Atomic Energy of Canada limited with respect to occupational exposure to external low-linear-energy-transfer ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 1993; 133:375-380.
    65) Grollino MG, Eleuteri P, & Mark HF: Children exposed to chronic contamination after the Chernobyl accident: cytogenetic and radiotoxicological analyses. Arch Environ Med 1998; 53:344-346.
    66) Grossman CM, Nussbaum RH, & Nussbaum FD: Cancers among residents downwind of the Hanford, Washington, plutonium production site. Arch Environ Health 2003; 58:267-274.
    67) Gundestrup M & Storm HH: Radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia and other cancers in commercial jet cockpit crew: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 1999; 354:2029-2031.
    68) Gunn VL, Barone MA, Johns Hopkins Hospital, et al: The Harriet Lane handbook: a manual for pediatric house officers, Mosby, Philadelphia, PA, 2002, pp -.
    69) Hagelstrom AH, Gorla NB, & Larripa IB: Chromosomal damage in workers occupationally exposed to chronic low level ionizing radiation. Toxicol Lett 1995; 76:113-117.
    70) Hallenbeck WH: Radiation protection, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994.
    71) Hamilton TE, van Belle G, & LoGerfo JP: Thyroid neoplasia in Marshall Islanders exposed to nuclear fallout. JAMA 1987; 258:629-636.
    72) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    73) Howe GR & McLaughlin J: Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study. Radiat Res 1996; 145:694-707.
    74) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    75) ICRP: The principles and general procedures for handling emergency and accidental exposure of workers: A report of the Commitee 4 of the International Commission on Radiologic Protection, in Radiation Protection, ICRP Publication 28. International Commission on Radiologic Protection, 1977.
    76) Ikenoue T, Ikeda T, & Ibara S: Effects of environmental factors on perinatal outcome: Neurological development in cases of intrauterine growth retardation and school performance of children perinatally exposed to ionizing radiation. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101:53-57.
    77) Jarrett D: Medical Management of Radiological Casualties Handbook, 1st edition, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1999.
    78) Joksic G & Spasojevic-Tisma V: Chromosome analysis of lymphocytes from radiation workers in tritium-applying industry. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1998; 71:213-220.
    79) Karagas MR, McDonald JA, & Greenberg ER: Risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers after ionizing radiation therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:1848-1853.
    80) Kasuba V, Rozgaj R, & Sentija K: Chromosomal aberrations in medical staff occupationally exposed to X-rays: a follow-up study. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 1998; 49:1-8.
    81) Katayama S, Shimaoka K, & Osman G: Radiation-associated thyrotoxicosis. J Surg Oncol 1986; 33:84-87.
    82) Kauppinen T, Partanen T, & Degerth R: Pancreatic cancer and occupational exposures. Epidemiol 1995; 6:498-502.
    83) Kendall GM, Muirhead CR, & MacGibbon BH: Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br Med J 1992; 304:220-225.
    84) Kerber RA, Till JE, & Simon SL: A cohort study of thyroid disease in relation to fallout from nuclear weapons testing. JAMA 1993; 270:2076-2082.
    85) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    86) Koenig KL, Goans RE, Hatchett RJ, et al: Medical treatment of radiological casualties: current concepts. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45(6):643-652.
    87) Kreuzer M, Straif K, Marsh JW, et al: Occupational dust and radiation exposure and mortality from stomach cancer among German uranium miners, 1946-2003. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69(3):217-223.
    88) Lieberman AN, Randarenko IG, & Pethkurov AV: Influence of small doses of ionising radiation on the course and result of pregnancies (Russian), in: Polonskaja EJ (Ed), Radiation Hygiene, Russian Ministry of Health, Scientific Research Institute for Radiation Hygiene, Leningrad, Russia, 1990, pp 100.
    89) Lindholm C, Tekkel M, & Veidebaum T: Persistence of translocations after accidental exposure to ionizing radiation. Internat J Radiat Biol 1998; 74:565-571.
    90) Linet MS, Freedman DM, Mohan AK, et al: Incidence of haematopoietic malignancies in US radiologic technologists. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62(12):861-867.
    91) Little JB: Cellular, molecular, and carcinogenic effects of radiation. Hematol/Oncol Clin N Amer 1993; 7:337-352.
    92) Little MP, De Vathaire F, & Charles MW: Variations with time and age in the risks of solid cancer incidence after radiation exposure in childhood. Stat Med 1998; 30:1341-1355.
    93) Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, & Fitzsimmons EJ: Death of a classified worker probably caused by overexposure to radiation. Occup Environ Med 1994; 51:713-718.
    94) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    95) Mangano JJ: A post-Chernobyl rise in thyroid cancer in Connecticut, USA. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996; 5:75-81.
    96) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    97) Medical Response Subcommittee of the National Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee: Emergency department management of radiation casualties. Health Physics Society. McLean, VA. 2009. Available from URL: http://emergency.cdc.gov/radiation/clinicians.asp. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    98) Mendelsohn ML: Health Phys 1990; 59:23-28.
    99) Messiha FS: Developmental toxicity of cesium in the mouse (minireview). Gen Pharmac 1994; 25:395-400.
    100) Mettler FA Jr, Monsein L, & Davis M: Three-phase radionuclide bone scanning in evaluation of local radiation injury: a case report. Clin Nucl Med 1987; 12:805-808.
    101) Miller RW: Heath Phys 1990; 59:57-61.
    102) Mole RH: Br J Radiol 1987; 60:17-31.
    103) Mole RH: Radiol Protect Bull 1985; 67:18.
    104) Mole RH: The effect of prenatal radiation exposure on the developing human brain. Interat J Radiat Biol 1990; 57:647-663.
    105) Movsas B, Raffin TA, & Epstein AH: Pulmonary radiation injury (review). Chest 1997; 111:1061-1076.
    106) Muller K & Meineke V : Advances in the management of localized radiation injuries. Health Phys 2010; 98(6):843-850.
    107) Nagataki S, Shibata Y, & Inoue S: Thyroid diseases among atomic bomb survivors in Nagasaki. JAMA 1994; 272:364-370.
    108) Natl Acad Sci: The treatment of Radiation Injury: Report of Committee on Pathologic Effects of Atomic Radiation, Publication 1134, National Academy of Sciences -- National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1963.
    109) Nitta Y, Kamiya K, & Yokoro K: Carcinogenic effect of in utero CF-252 and CO-60 irradiation in C57Bl/6NXC3H/HEf1 (B6C3f1) mice. J Radiat Res 1992; 33:319-333.
    110) Norton S: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 83:240-249.
    111) Oak Ridge Institue for Science and Education: Managing radiation emergencies: Guidance for hospital medical management. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Oak Ridge, TN. 2002. Available from URL: http://orise.orau.gov/reacts/guide/emergency.htm. As accessed 2011-04-06.
    112) Okada S: A Review of Thirty Years Study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors. J Radiat Res 1975; 16 (Suppl).
    113) Otake & Schull J: Br J Radiol 1984; 57:409.
    114) Otake M & Schull WJ: Radiation-related brain damage and growth retardation among the prenatally exposed atomic bomb survivors. Internat J Radiat Biol 1998; 74:159-171.
    115) Pacini F, Vorontsova T, & Molinaro E: Prevalence of thyroid autoantibodies in children and adolescents from Belarus exposed to the Chernobyl radioactive fallout. Lancet 1998; 352:763-766.
    116) Padovani L, Caporossi D, & Tedeschi B: Cytogenetic study in lymphocytes from children exposed to ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident. Mutat Res 1993; 319:55-60.
    117) Parker L, Pearce MS, & O'Dickinson H: Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant. Lancet 1999; 354:1407-1414.
    118) Paz-y-Mino C, Leone PE, & Chavez G: Follow up study of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 1995; 335:245-241.
    119) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    120) Peter RU, Braunfalco O, & Birioukov A: Chronic cutaneous damage after accidental exposure to ionizing radiation: the Chernobyl experience. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30:719-723.
    121) Pinkerton LE, Bloom TF, Hein MJ, et al: Mortality among a cohort of uranium mill workers: an update. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61:57-64.
    122) Product Information: IOSAT(TM) oral tablets, potassium iodide oral tablets. Anbex Inc., New York, NY, 2005.
    123) Product Information: LOMOTIL(R) CV oral tablets, oral liquid, diphenoxylate hcl, atropine sulfate oral tablets, oral liquid. GD Searle LLC, New York, NY, 2005.
    124) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    125) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    126) Product Information: loperamide hcl oral capsules, loperamide hcl oral capsules. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Sellersville, PA, 2005.
    127) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    128) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    129) REPROTOX : REPROTOX Information System, Scialli AR (Ed), (CD-ROM Version). Georgetown University Medical Center and Reproductive Toxicology Center, Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    130) Radiation Emergency Assistance Center: The medical aspects of radiation incidents. Radiation Emergency Assistance Center. Oak Ridge, TN. 2011. Available from URL: http://orise.orau.gov/files/reacts/medical-aspects-of-radiation-incidents.pdf. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    131) Ramsay CN, Ellis PM, & Zealley H: Down's syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland -- 1978 to 1989. Biomed Pharmacother 1991; 45:267-272.
    132) Rericha V, Kulich M, Rericha R, et al: Incidence of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma in Czech uranium miners: a case-cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114(6):818-822.
    133) Roed KH & Jacobsen M: Chromosome aberrations in Norwegian reindeer following the Chernobyl accident. Mutat Res 1995; 346:159-165.
    134) Roman E, Doyle P, & Maconochie N: Cancer in children of nuclear industry employees: report on children aged under 25 years from nuclear industry family study. Br Med J 1999; 318:1443-1450.
    135) Romano E, Ferrucci L, & Nicolai F: Increase of chromosomal aberrations induced by ionising radiation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of civil avaition pilots and crew members. Mutat Res 1997; 377:89-93.
    136) Ron E, Ikeda T, Preston DL, et al: Male breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(8):603-605.
    137) Saddi V, Curry J, & Nohturfft A: Increased hprt mutant frequencies in Brazilian children accidentally exposed to ionizing radiation. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996; 28:267-275.
    138) Saku T, Hayashi Y, & Takahara O: Salivary gland tumors among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1987. Cancer 1997; 79:1465-1475.
    139) Salovsky P, Shopova V, & Dancheva V: Pneumonotoxic effects of radioactive dust (RD) from a nuclear power plant in Kozloduy, Bulgaria. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38:639-643.
    140) Sasaki MS, Takatsuji T, & Ejima Y: The F value cannot be ruled out as a chromosomal fingerprint of radiation quality. Radiat Res 1998; 150:253-258.
    141) Satoh C, Takahashi N, & Asakawa J: Genetic analysis of children of atomic bomb survivors. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(Suppl 3):511-519.
    142) Schneider G & Burkart W: Health risks of ionizing radiation (German). Radiologe 1998; 38:719-725.
    143) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    144) Seifert AM, Demers C, & Dubeau H: HPRT-mutant frequency and lymphocyte characteristics of workers exposed to ionizing radiation on a sporadic basis -- a comparison of two exposure indicators, job title and dose. Mutat Res 1993; 319:61-70.
    145) Selby PB: Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers (letter). Lancet 2000; 355:492-493.
    146) Servomaa K, Kiuru A, & Grenman R: p53 mutations associated with increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation in human head and neck cancer cell lines. Cell Prolif 1996; 29:219-230.
    147) Shanahan EM, Peterson D, & Roxby D: Mutation rates at the glycophorin A and hprt loci in uranium miners exposed to radon progeny. Occup Environ Med 1996; 53:439-444.
    148) Shintani T, Hayakawa N, & Kamada N: High incidence of meningioma in survivors of Hiroshima (Letter). Lancet 1997; 349:1369.
    149) Smith MB, Xue H, & Takahashi H: Iodine-131 thyroid ablation in female children and adolescents -- long-term risk of infertility and birth defects. Ann Surg Oncol 1994; 1:128-131.
    150) Sorahan T & Roberts PJ: Childhood cancer and paternal exposure to ionizing radiation: Preliminary findings from the Oxford survey of childhood cancers. Am J Ind Med 1993; 23:343-354.
    151) Sorahan T, Lancashire RJ, & Temperton DH: Childhood cancer and paternal exposure to ionizing radiation: A second report from the Oxford survey of childhood cancers. Am J Ind Med 1995; 28:71-78.
    152) Sperling K, Pelz J, & Wegner RD: Frequency of trisomy 21 in Germany before and after the Chernobyl accident. Biomed Pharmacother 1991; 45:255-262.
    153) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    154) Stayner LT et al: NIOSH Report 1184B. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1983.
    155) Streffer C, Muller WU, & Kryscio A: Micronuclei-biological indicator for retrospective dosimetry after exposure to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 1998; 404:101-105.
    156) Thompson LH & Jeggo PA: Nomenclature of human genes involved in ionizing radiation sensitivity. Mutat Res 1995; 337:131-134.
    157) Tomei F, Papaleo B, & Fantini S: Vascular effects of occupational exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation. Am J Ind Med 1996; 30:72-77.
    158) Toohey RE: Internal dose assessment in radiation accidents. Rad Protect Dosimetry 2003; 105:329-331.
    159) Tucker JD, Ramsey MJ, & Lee DA: Validation of chromosome painting as a biodosimeter in human peripheral lymphocytes following acute exposure to ionizing radiation invitro. Internat J Radiat Biol 1993; 64:27-37.
    160) Tucker JD, Tawn EJ, & Holdsworth D: Biological dosimetry of radiation workers at the Sellafield nurlear facility. Radiat Res 1997; 148:216-226.
    161) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Radiation emergency medical management: Decontamination procedures. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/ext_contamination.htm. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    162) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Radiation emergency medical management: Managing internal contamination. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. 2011b. Available from URL: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/int_contamination.htm. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    163) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Raditation emergency medical management: Patient management algorithms. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. 2011a. Available from URL: http://www.remm.nlm.gov/patientmanagement.htm. As accessed 2011-03-16.
    164) Vanagunas A, Jacob P, & Olinger E: Radiation-induced esophageal injury: A spectrum from esophagitis to cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:808-812.
    165) Verger P: Down syndrome and ionizing radiation. Health Physics 1997; 73:882-893.
    166) Verzijl JM, Joore JCA, & van Dijk A: In vitro binding characteristics for cesium of two qualities of prussian blue, activated charcoal and resonium-a. Clin Toxicol 1992; 30:215-222.
    167) Verzijl JM, Lie RL & Savelkoul TJ et al: In-vitro binding characteristics for cesium of two qualities of Prussian blue, activated charcoal, and Resonium-A(R). Personal Communication, 1990.
    168) Wagner RH, Boles MA, & Henkin RE: Treatment of radiation exposure and contamination. Radiographics 1994; 14:387-396.
    169) Wakeford R & Berry RJ: Nuclear facilities and cancers. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1996; 25:468-476.
    170) Wakeford R: The risk of childhood cancer from intrauterine and preconceptional exposure to ionizing radiation. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103:1018-1025.
    171) Wiggs LD, Johnson ER, & Cox-DeVore CA: Mortality through 1990 among white male workers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory: Considering exposures to plutonium and external ionizing radiation. Health Physics 1994; 67:577-588.
    172) Wilson VL, Taffe BG, & Shields PG: Detection and quantification of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine adducts in peripheral blood of people exposed to ionizing radiation. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 99261-99263.
    173) Wing S & Richardson DB: Age at exposure to ionising radiation and cancer mortality among Hanford workers: follow up through 1994. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62(7):465-472.
    174) Wing S, Richardson D, Wolf S, et al: Plutonium-related work and cause-specific mortality at the United States Department of Energy Hanford Site. Am J Ind Med 2004; 45(2):153-164.
    175) Wones R, Radack K, & Martin V: Do persons living near a uranium processing site have evidence of increased somatic cell gene mutations -- a first study. Mutat Res 1995; 335:171-184.
    176) Yoshimaru H, Otake M, & Schull WJ: Further observations on abnormal brain development caused by prenatal A-bomb exposure to ionizing radiation. Internat J Radiat Biol 1995; 67:359-371.
    177) Zolzer F, Hillebrandt S, & Streffer C: Radiation induced G(1)-block and p53 status in six human cell lines. Radiother Oncol 1995; 37:20-28.
    178) Zwingmann IN, Welle IJ, & van Herwijnen M: Oxidative DNA damage and cytogenetic effects in flight engineers exposed to cosmic radiation. Environ Mol Mutagen 1998; 32:121-129.