MOBILE VIEW  | 

HYDROMORPHONE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) HYDROmorphone is a semisynthetic opioid agonist used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is subject to diversion and abuse.

Specific Substances

    1) HYDROmorphone hydrochloride
    2) Dihydromorphinone
    3) Dihydromorphinone hydrochloride
    4) 7,8-dihydromorphinone
    5) 6-deoxy-7,8-dihydro-6-oxomorphine
    6) CAS 466-99-9 (HYDROmorphone)
    7) CAS 71-68-1 (HYDROmorphone hydrochloride)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) HYDROmorphone is available as:
    a) A clear, sweet liquid for oral administration containing 5 mg HYDROmorphone per 5 mL (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    b) Tablets of 2 mg, 4 mg and 8 mg HYDROmorphone (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    c) Extended-release tablets of 8 mg, 12 mg and 16 mg HYDROmorphone (Prod Info EXALGO(R) extended release oral tablets, 2010). OROS TECHNOLOGY: This oral delivery system has an osmotic push layer that absorbs water from the GI tract and releases HYDROmorphone through a laser-drilled hole at a constant rate (Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 2013).
    d) Rectal suppositories of 3 mg HYDROmorphone(Prod Info hydromorphone hcl rectal suppositories, 2005).
    e) A solution for injection with HYDROmorphone concentrations of 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) and DILAUDID-HP(R) subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection, 2008).
    B) USES
    1) HYDROmorphone is a semisynthetic opioid agonist used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is subject to diversion and abuse.

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: HYDROmorphone is used for the treatment of pain. HYDROmorphone may be abused for its euphoric effects by multiple routes (i.e., injection, insufflation, ingestion). It is available also as a sustained release formulation.
    B) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is fairly common, particularly in patients with chronic opioid abuse, and may be life threatening.
    C) PHARMACOLOGY: HYDROmorphone is a semisynthetic derivative of morphine, that binds at the opiate receptors.
    D) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Euphoria, sedation, light headedness, nausea, vomiting, constipation and pruritus are the most common adverse effects.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils. Mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) HYDROmorphone is registered as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of HYDROmorphone use during pregnancy. HYDROmorphone crosses the placenta. In general, the use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy is associated with fetal adverse effects which include physical dependence and withdrawal, retardation of growth, and neonatal respiratory depression with high doses. HYDROmorphone use is not recommended during or immediately prior to labor when other shorter-acting analgesic techniques are available. Opioids can prolong labor by temporarily reducing the strength, duration, and frequency of uterine contractions, however, these effects are not consistent and may be offset by an increased rate of cervical dilatation which can shorten labor. If prolonged use during pregnancy is required, monitor the newborn for symptoms of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. HYDROmorphone should only be used during pregnancy if the benefit to the mother outweighs the potential risks to the fetus.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) HYDROmorphone plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a self harm ingestion as other products may be involved.
    E) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of HYDROmorphone toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: GI decontamination is generally not indicated because of the risk of CNS depression and aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may only need observation. Patients ingesting an extended release formulation should be observed for at least 16 hours as maximum effects may be delayed.
    C) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for severe toxicity (respiratory or CNS depression). Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE, an opioid antagonist, is the specific antidote. Naloxone can be given intravascularly, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intranasally or endotracheally. The usual dose is 0.4 to 2.0 mg IV. In patients with suspected opioid dependence, incremental doses of 0.2 mg IV should be administered, titrated to reversal of respiratory depression and coma, to avoid precipitating acute opioid withdrawal. Doses may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg. Very high doses are rarely needed, but may be necessary in overdoses of high potency opioids, like HYDROmorphone.
    2) A CONTINUOUS infusion may be necessary after large overdose or ingestion of an extended release product. A suggested starting rate is two-thirds of the dose effective for initial reversal that is administered each hour; titrate as needed. DURATION of effect is usually 1 to 2 hours. HYDROmorphone has a longer duration of effect, so it is necessary to observe the patient at least 4 hours after the last dose of naloxone to ensure that the patient does not have recurrent symptoms of toxicity. Naloxone can precipitate withdrawal in an opioid-dependent patient, which is usually not life-threatening; however it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia. Treatment includes ensuring adequate oxygenation, and administering intravenous benzodiazepines; propofol or barbiturates may be indicated, if seizures persist.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Acute lung injury can develop in a small proportion of patients after an acute opioid overdose, although it has not yet been reported with HYDROmorphone. The pathophysiology is unclear. Patients should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after overdose to evaluate for hypoxia and/or the development of acute lung injury.
    H) HYPOTENSION
    1) Hypotension is often reversed by naloxone. Initially, treat with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    I) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value.
    J) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose, particularly in young children or those with underlying respiratory compromise. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a healthcare professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions or who are symptomatic, or any pediatric ingestion above the therapeutic dose for age and weight should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment.
    a) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe for at least 4 hours, to ensure that peak plasma levels have been reached and there has been sufficient time for symptoms to develop. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    b) EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients that have ingested an extended-release or long acting product have the potential to manifest symptoms in a delayed fashion and should be observed for at least 24 hours and should be admitted if they become symptomatic.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Patients with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a long acting formulation has likely been taken; additional naloxone doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting. EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients who develop even mild to moderate opioid effects and those requiring naloxone should be admitted to a monitored setting as they may develop more severe, prolonged toxicity.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    K) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Naloxone's duration of effect is shorter than the duration of effect of HYDROmorphone. Other causes of altered mental status must be ruled out, such as hypoxia or hypoglycemia. In addition, it is necessary to inspect opioid-intoxicated patients for fentanyl patches as the drug will be constantly delivered until the patch is removed. Failure to observe for at least 24 hours if a long acting formulation of HYDROmorphone has been ingested.
    L) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Rapidly absorbed, peak concentration 0.5 to 1 hours regular release. Limited protein binding (8% to 19%), large volume of distribution (302 L) , extensive hepatic metabolism, and elimination half-life of 2.3 hours for regular release formulations. EXTENDED-RELEASE formulations are slowly absorbed, with serum concentrations gradually increasing over 6 to 8 hours and then sustained for 18 to 24 hours. Time to maximum concentration is 12 to 16 hours. Extended-release formulations have an apparent elimination half-life of 10 to 11 hours.
    M) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) If an extended-release formulation is broken, crushed, dissolved, chewed or injected, rapid absorption of the entire dose will occur with significant risk for overdose.
    N) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Overdose with other sedating agents (e.g., ethanol, benzodiazepine/barbiturate, antipsychotics); overdose with central alpha 2 agonists (eg, clonidine, tizanidine, imidazoline decongestants); CNS infection; intracranial hemorrhage; hypoglycemia or hypoxia.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose is not established and depends on individual patient tolerance. An adolescent ingested 3 or 4 capsules of controlled-release HYDROmorphone 24 mg and was found unresponsive the next morning. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Usual starting dose is 2 to 4 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours. PEDIATRIC: For opioid naive children: Immediate release: 0.03 mg/kg (max 1.3 mg) orally every 4 hours as needed for pain. Slow release: 0.06 mg/kg (max 4 mg) orally every 8 hours.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: HYDROmorphone is used for the treatment of pain. HYDROmorphone may be abused for its euphoric effects by multiple routes (i.e., injection, insufflation, ingestion). It is available also as a sustained release formulation.
    B) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Overdose is fairly common, particularly in patients with chronic opioid abuse, and may be life threatening.
    C) PHARMACOLOGY: HYDROmorphone is a semisynthetic derivative of morphine, that binds at the opiate receptors.
    D) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Euphoria, sedation, light headedness, nausea, vomiting, constipation and pruritus are the most common adverse effects.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: Euphoria, drowsiness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils. Mild bradycardia or hypotension may be present.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea, hypoxia, coma, bradycardia, or acute lung injury. Rarely, seizures may develop from hypoxia. Death may result from any of these complications.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MIOSIS: After overdose, pupils are typically pinpoint and sluggishly reactive to light (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension may develop with severe overdose (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    B) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Bradycardia may develop with severe overdose and may be secondary to hypoxia (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    C) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a severe overdose, in particular an intravenous exposure, cardiac arrest, circulatory collapse and death may occur (Prod Info DILAUDID(R), DILAUDID-HP(R) injection, 2008).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory depression is typical after overdose, and may progress to respiratory failure (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    B) ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old boy ingested 3 or 4 capsules of controlled-release HYDROmorphone 24 mg and was found unresponsive the next morning. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. An autopsy revealed diffuse pulmonary edema and widespread acute aspiration-related bronchopneumonia (Meatherall et al, 2011).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CNS excitation, including agitation, myoclonus, seizures, tremors, confusion, hallucinations and muscle spasms can develop in patients receiving high dose therapy, particularly in the presence of renal insufficiency (Thwaites et al, 2004; Chung et al, 2004). These manifestations are believed to be secondary to the accumulation of the neuroexcitatory metabolite hydromorphone-3-glucuronide (Murray & Hagen, 2005).
    b) MYOCLONUS AND ENCEPHALOPATHY: CASE REPORT: Myoclonus and encephalopathy developed in a 68-year-old woman a day after undergoing an operative repair of a proximal humeral fracture and receiving 6 doses of HYDROmorphone 0.5 mg IV pre- and postoperatively and 3 doses of tramadol 50 mg and oxycodone 10 mg every 3 hours postoperatively. Myoclonus resolved after receiving several doses of naloxone 0.1 mg IV. Symptoms of myoclonus completely resolved 24 hours after discontinuing HYDROmorphone. Tramadol was discontinued prior to discharge and she was discharged on oxycodone (Parker Cote et al, 2015).
    c) In a noninterventional, prospective study, 10 (6.4%) of 156 hospice patients (mean age, 70 years; range, 36 to 95 years) treated with HYDROmorphone (average dose and duration: 2.15 mg/hour continuously for 6 days; about 1032 mg of oral morphine equivalents/day) developed symptoms of neuroexcitation, including hyperalgesia in 7 patients, myoclonus in 8 patients, and allodynia in 1 patient. The average dose and duration of HYDROmorphone in patients who did not develop neuroexcitation was 0.88 mg/hour continuously for 5.48 days (about 422 mg of oral morphine equivalents/day). It was determined that the risk of developing HYDROmorphone-induced neuroexcitation increases with larger doses, increasing age, increasing serum creatinine, and the presence of malignant neoplasm. However, the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm was not a significant predictor of HYDROmorphone-induced neuroexcitation when the logistic regression model was used and adjusted for the variables (Kullgren et al, 2013).
    B) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CNS depression is typical after overdose and may progress to coma (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    C) SEROTONIN SYNDROME
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: An 81-year-old woman had been on lisinopril, pentoxifylline, hydroxyzine, montelukast and fluoxetine for several years. Two days after starting HYDROmorphone 12 mg daily, she developed confusion, diaphoresis, flushing, tremor, hyperreflexia, muscle spasms, incoherent speech, and abnormal movements. Symptoms resolved after fluoxetine was discontinued (No Authors Listed, 2004).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting are common adverse effects with therapeutic use (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation is a common adverse effect with therapeutic use (Prod Info DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, 2009).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) HYDROmorphone is registered as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of HYDROmorphone use during pregnancy. HYDROmorphone crosses the placenta. In general, the use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy is associated with fetal adverse effects which include physical dependence and withdrawal, retardation of growth, and neonatal respiratory depression with high doses. HYDROmorphone use is not recommended during or immediately prior to labor when other shorter-acting analgesic techniques are available. Opioids can prolong labor by temporarily reducing the strength, duration, and frequency of uterine contractions, however, these effects are not consistent and may be offset by an increased rate of cervical dilatation which can shorten labor. If prolonged use during pregnancy is required, monitor the newborn for symptoms of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. HYDROmorphone should only be used during pregnancy if the benefit to the mother outweighs the potential risks to the fetus.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HAMSTERS: Skull malformations (exencephaly and cranioschisis) were observed in Syrian hamsters administered oral doses approximately 2-fold higher than the human dose of 2.5 to 10 mg every 3 to 6 hours for oral solution and 7-fold higher than the human dose of 2 to 4 mg every 4 to 6 hours for oral tablets, based on body surface area, during gestation days 8 to 9 (peak of organogenesis) (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info DILAUDID(R) and DILAUDID-HP(R) subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection, 2008; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    2) MICE: Soft tissue malformations (cryptorchidism, cleft palate, and malformed ventricles and retina) and skeletal variations (split supraoccipital, checkerboard and split sternebrae, delayed ossification of the paws and ectopic ossification sites) were observed in CF-1 mice administered IV doses greater than or equal to 15 mg/kg over 24 hours (approximately 3-fold higher than the human daily dose of 24 mg) during organogenesis (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    3) RABBITS: No evidence of teratogenicity or embryotoxicity when pregnant rabbits were given 50 mg/kg (3- and 6-fold greater than a 32 mg human dose, based on exposure) during crucial organ development (Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014).
    4) RATS: A decrease in pup body weight, and an increase in pup mortality was associated with maternal toxicity in a pre and postnatal rat study of HYDROmorphone doses of 2 and 5 mg/kg/day. The maternal no effect level dose for HYDROmorphone was 0.5 mg/kg/day (less than 1-fold lower than a 32 mg human daily oral dose, based on body surface area). Prenatal and postnatal pup development was normal when female rats were given up to 5 mg/kg doses (equivalent to a 32 mg human daily oral dose per body surface area) (Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014). No evidence of teratogenicity was observed in rats administered oral doses up to 7 mg/kg/day (approximately equivalent to the human dose of 2.5 to 10 mg every 3 to 6 hours for oral solution and 3-fold higher than the human dose of 2 to 4 mg every 4 to 6 hours for oral tablets, based on body surface area) (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info DILAUDID(R) and DILAUDID-HP(R) subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection, 2008). No evidence of teratogenicity or embryotoxicity when pregnant rats were administered 10 mg/kg doses during crucial organ development (Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014)
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) HYDROmorphone is classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info DILAUDID(R) IV, IM, subcutaneous injection , 2011).
    2) SUMMARY: There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of HYDROmorphone use during pregnancy. HYDROmorphone crosses the placenta. In general, the use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy is associated with fetal adverse effects which include physical dependence and withdrawal, retardation of growth, and neonatal respiratory depression with high doses (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Lee , 1994). Use of HYDROmorphone oral solution and tablets are contraindicated during labor and delivery (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013); use caution with injectable forms since opioids cross the placenta and may cause respiratory depression and physiologic effects in neonates (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013). Opioids can prolong labor by temporarily reducing the strength, duration, and frequency of uterine contractions, however, these effects are not consistent and may be offset by an increased rate of cervical dilatation which can shorten labor. If prolonged use during pregnancy is required, monitor the newborn for symptoms of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. HYDROmorphone should only be used during pregnancy if the benefit to the mother outweighs the potential risks to the fetus (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    B) NEONATAL DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL
    1) Prolonged use of HYDROmorphone during pregnancy may result in neonatal dependence, and withdrawal shortly following birth (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014). This condition may become life-threatening without early recognition, treatment, and management (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    C) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION
    1) Opioids, such as HYDROmorphone, cross the placenta and may produce respiratory depression in neonates. Administration of HYDROmorphone shortly before delivery may cause CNS and respiratory depression in the neonate. Chronic administration of HYDROmorphone may induce dependence and cause life-threatening neonatal withdrawal syndrome (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    D) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: No evidence of embryotoxicity was observed in rats administered oral doses up to 7 mg/kg/day (approximately equivalent to the human dose of 2.5 to 10 mg every 3 to 6 hours for oral solution and 3-fold higher than the human dose of 2 to 4 mg every 4 to 6 hours for the oral tablet, based on body surface area) (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info DILAUDID(R) and DILAUDID-HP(R) subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection, 2008).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Eight lactating women were administered a single 2 mg dose of HYDROmorphone intranasally, and the concentration of drug measured in plasma and breast milk. HYDROmorphone was found to distribute rapidly from plasma to breast milk, resulting in low doses (0.67% +/- 0.21% of the maternal dose of 2 mg) available for the nursing infant (Edwards et al, 2003).
    2) Opioids are detected at low levels in breast milk; in general, HYDROmorphone should not be administered to nursing mothers (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013; Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    3) It is recommended that neonates be monitored for withdrawal symptoms after exposure to naloxone (Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: No effects on fertility, reproductive performance, or reproductive organ morphology were observed in male or female rats administered oral doses up to 7 mg/kg/day (equivalent to the 2.5 to 10 mg human dose every 3 to 6 hours for oral solution and 3-fold higher than the 2 to 4 mg human dose every 4 to 6 hours for oral tablets, based on body surface area) (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, 2013). Oral doses of 6.25 mg/kg/day (1.2 times higher than the human exposure to 32 mg/day) of HYDROmorphone given to rats resulted in a slight but statistically significant reduction in implantations (Prod Info PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, 2014; Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) HIBERNOMA
    1) RATS: The incidence of hibernoma (tumor of brown fat) was increased in female Han-Wistar rats who received HYDROmorphone hydrochloride 25 mg/kg/day (2 tumors; 10.5 times the maximum recommended human daily exposure based on AUC) or 75 mg/kg/day (4 tumors; 53.7 times the maximum recommended human daily exposure based on AUC) for 2 years by oral gavage (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2013).
    B) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) MICE: No evidence of carcinogenic potential was noted in Crl:CD1(R)(ICR) mice who received up to 15 mg/kg/day of HYDROmorphone hydrochloride for 2 years by oral gavage. The systemic drug exposure (AUC) at the 15 mg/kg/day dose was 1.1 (males) and 1.2 (females) times greater than the human exposure with a single dose of 32 mg/day (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2013).

Genotoxicity

    A) HYDROmorphone was not mutagenic in the in vitro Ames assay (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2013). It was not clastogenic in the in vitro human lymphocyte chromosome aberration assay and the in vivo mouse micronucleus assay (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2013).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) HYDROmorphone plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a self harm ingestion as other products may be involved.
    E) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of HYDROmorphone toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Methods

    A) In one case report, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) were used to obtain postmortem concentrations of HYDROmorphone and HYDROmorphone-3-glucuronide (Meatherall et al, 2011).
    B) Quantitative concentrations of HYDROmorphone and its metabolites can be determined in biologic fluids using HPLC (Davison & Mayo, 2008).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Patients with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as a long acting formulation has likely been taken; additional naloxone doses may be needed. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    B) EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients who develop even mild to moderate opioid effects and those requiring naloxone should be admitted to a monitored setting as they may develop more severe, prolonged toxicity.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose, particularly in young children or those with underlying respiratory compromise. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a healthcare professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid naive.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) SUMMARY: Patients with deliberate ingestions or who are symptomatic, or any pediatric ingestion above the therapeutic dose for age and weight should be sent to a healthcare facility for evaluation and treatment.
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Observe for at least 4 hours, to ensure that peak plasma levels have been reached and there has been sufficient time for symptoms to develop. Patients who are treated with naloxone should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury.
    a) Patients should be observed for return of respiratory depression and resedation after naloxone administration; more than one dose may be required (Watson et al, 1998). The duration of action for naloxone is approximately 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the dose, route and the opioid agonist ingested (Howland, 2006).
    2) EXTENDED RELEASE: Patients that have ingested an extended-release or long acting product have the potential to manifest symptoms in a delayed fashion and should be observed for at least 24 hours and should be admitted if they become symptomatic.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) HYDROmorphone plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    D) Obtain acetaminophen and salicylate levels in patients with a self harm ingestion as other products may be involved.
    E) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of HYDROmorphone toxicity is uncertain.
    F) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT or lumbar puncture, or both to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital GI decontamination is generally not recommended because of the risk of CNS depression and subsequent aspiration.
    B) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    1) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    2) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    3) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    4) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998a)
    C) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    1) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    a) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    2) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    a) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    3) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    a) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    b) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    4) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    a) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    b) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    c) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    5) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    a) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    b) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    c) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    d) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    6) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    a) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    b) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    c) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    d) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    e) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    1) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    2) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    3) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    4) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    f) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    g) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    7) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    a) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    b) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    c) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    d) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    e) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    8) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    a) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Consider activated charcoal if a patient presents soon after an ingestion and is not manifesting signs and symptoms of toxicity. Activated charcoal is generally not recommended in patients with significant signs of toxicity because of the risk of aspiration. Gastric lavage is not recommended as patients usually do well with supportive care.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    3) VOLUNTEER STUDIES demonstrate that activated charcoal can decrease opioid absorption (Laine et al, 1997).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    2) Monitor for CNS and respiratory depression.
    3) HYDROmorphone plasma levels are not clinically useful or readily available. Urine toxicology screens may confirm exposure, but are rarely useful in guiding therapy.
    4) Obtain a 4 hour acetaminophen and salicylate concentration in any patient with a suspected self harm attempt.
    5) Other routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to rule out other causes or if the diagnosis of opioid toxicity is uncertain.
    6) Obtain a chest x-ray for persistent hypoxia. Consider a head CT and/or lumbar puncture to rule out an intracranial mass, bleeding or infection, if the diagnosis is uncertain.
    B) NALOXONE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998a)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    C) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    E) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia or coingestants. If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Administer intravenous, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or propofol, if seizures persist.
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    F) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Hypotension should initially be treated with a saline bolus, if a patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    3) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    4) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    G) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) SUMMARY: Early aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy and may help prevent renal insufficiency. Diuretics such as mannitol or furosemide may be added if necessary to maintain urine output but only after volume status has been restored as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. Urinary alkalinization is NOT routinely recommended.
    2) Initial treatment should be directed towards controlling acute metabolic disturbances such as hyperkalemia, hyperthermia, and hypovolemia. Control seizures, agitation, and muscle contractions (Erdman & Dart, 2004).
    3) FLUID REPLACEMENT: Early and aggressive fluid replacement is the mainstay of therapy to prevent renal failure. Vigorous fluid replacement with 0.9% saline (10 to 15 mL/kg/hour) is necessary even if there is no evidence of dehydration. Several liters of fluid may be needed within the first 24 hours (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Criddle, 2003; Polderman, 2004). Hypovolemia, increased insensible losses, and third spacing of fluid commonly increase fluid requirements. Strive to maintain a urine output of at least 1 to 2 mL/kg/hour (or greater than 150 to 300 mL/hour) (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Camp, 2009; Erdman & Dart, 2004; Criddle, 2003). To maintain a urine output this high, 500 to 1000 mL of fluid per hour may be required (Criddle, 2003). Monitor fluid input and urine output, plus insensible losses. Monitor for evidence of fluid overload and compartment syndrome; monitor serum electrolytes, CK, and renal function tests.
    4) DIURETICS: Diuretics (eg, mannitol or furosemide) may be needed to ensure adequate urine output and to prevent acute renal failure when used in combination with aggressive fluid therapy. Loop diuretics increase tubular flow and decrease deposition of myoglobin. These agents should be used only after volume status has been restored, as hypovolemia will increase renal tubular damage. If the patient is maintaining adequate urine output, loop diuretics are not necessary (Vanholder et al, 2000).
    5) URINARY ALKALINIZATION: Alkalinization of the urine is not routinely recommended, as it has never been documented to reduce nephrotoxicity, and may cause complications such as hypocalcemia and hypokalemia (Walter & Catenacci, 2008; Huerta-Alardin et al, 2005; Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004). Retrospective studies have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit from the use of urinary alkalinization (Brown et al, 2004; Polderman, 2004; Homsi et al, 1997).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) LACK OF EFFICACY
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The toxic dose is not established and depends on individual patient tolerance. An adolescent ingested 3 or 4 capsules of controlled-release HYDROmorphone 24 mg and was found unresponsive the next morning. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Usual starting dose is 2 to 4 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours. PEDIATRIC: For opioid naive children: Immediate release: 0.03 mg/kg (max 1.3 mg) orally every 4 hours as needed for pain. Slow release: 0.06 mg/kg (max 4 mg) orally every 8 hours.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) ORAL TABLETS
    1) IMMEDIATE-RELEASE TABLETS: Usual starting dose is 2 to 4 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution, 2012).
    B) EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS: Should only be administered to patients who are opioid tolerant. In converting patients from immediate release HYDROmorphone, the starting dose of extended release HYDROmorphone should be equivalent to the patient's total daily dose of oral HYDROmorphone, and the extended release HYDROmorphone should be administered once daily. To convert from other opioids to HYDROmorphone equivalents the conversion ratios are: codeine: 0.06; hydrocodone 0.4; methadone 0.6; morphine 0.2; oxycodone 0.4, and oxymorphone 0.6. Titrate in 4 to 8-mg increments every 3 or 4 days, as needed (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    1) If extended-release formulations are chewed, broken, crushed, dissolved or injected, the entire dose is absorbed rapidly and the risk of overdose is substantial (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014).
    C) ORAL SOLUTION
    1) Usual dose is 2.5 to 10 mg (2.5 to 10 mL) every 3 to 6 hours as needed for pain. Some patients may require higher than usual doses (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution, 2012).
    D) PARENTERAL
    1) Usual initial dose for opioid-naive patients is 1 to 2 mg subQ or IM every 2 to 3 hours, or 0.2 to 1 mg by IV every 2 to 3 hours as needed for pain (Prod Info DILAUDID-HP(R) IV, IM, subcutaneous injection, 2011).
    E) RECTAL SUPPOSITORY
    1) Usual dose is one 3-mg suppository every 6 to 8 hours as needed for pain (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl rectal suppository, 2012).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) ORAL TABLETS
    1) According to the manufacturer, safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, 2014; Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution, 2012). However, the following dosing has been used in children:
    a) For opioid naive children: Immediate release: 0.03 mg/kg (max 1.3 mg) every 4 hours as needed for pain. Slow release: 0.06 mg/kg (max 4 mg) every 8 hours (Zernikow et al, 2009).
    B) ORAL SOLUTION
    1) Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution, 2012).
    C) PARENTERAL
    1) According to the manufacturer, safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info DILAUDID-HP(R) IV, IM, subcutaneous injection, 2011). However, the following dosing has been used in children:
    a) In opioid naive children Bolus: 0.01 mg/kg (max 0.5 mg) IV every 3 hours as needed for pain. Continuous infusion: 0.005 mg/kg/hr (MAX: 0.2 mg/hr) (Zernikow et al, 2009).
    D) RECTAL SUPPOSITORY
    1) Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info hydromorphone HCl rectal suppository, 2012).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old boy (opioid naive) ingested 3 or 4 capsules of controlled-release HYDROmorphone 24 mg and was found dead the next morning. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. An autopsy revealed diffuse pulmonary edema and widespread acute aspiration-related bronchopneumonia (Meatherall et al, 2011).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) EPIDURAL
    1) CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old woman was inadvertently given 5 mg epidural HYDROmorphone instead of the intended 0.5 mg; the only manifestation was a slight increase in PaCO2 on arterial blood gas without clinical evidence of respiratory or CNS depression (Moon & Clements, 1985).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old man treated with an epidural HYDROmorphone infusion of 0.2 mg/hr inadvertently received a bolus of 3.05 mg and remained asymptomatic (Kreitzman & Samuels, 1990).
    B) INTRAVENOUS
    1) A 61-year-old man treated with HYDROmorphone via intravenous patient controlled analgesia for bone metastases (constant hip pain) received escalating doses from 23 mg HYDROmorphone on the first day to 1890 mg over 24 hours on the eighth day. He developed worsening pain, muscle spasms, myoclonus, tremor, confusion and hallucinations. Mental status improved, and myoclonus and tremors resolved 48 hours after HYDROmorphone was discontinued and oral methadone and oxycodone were substituted (Chung et al, 2004).
    2) In a noninterventional, prospective study, 10 (6.4%) of 156 hospice patients (mean age, 70 years; range, 36 to 95 years) treated with HYDROmorphone (average dose and duration: 2.15 mg/hour continuously for 6 days; about 1032 mg of oral morphine equivalents/day) developed symptoms of neuroexcitation, including hyperalgesia in 7 patients, myoclonus in 8 patients, and allodynia in 1 patient. The average dose and duration of HYDROmorphone in patients who did not develop neuroexcitation was 0.88 mg/hour continuously for 5.48 days (about 422 mg of oral morphine equivalents/day). It was determined that the risk of developing HYDROmorphone-induced neuroexcitation increases with larger doses, increasing age, increasing serum creatinine, and the presence of malignant neoplasm. However, the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm was not a significant predictor of HYDROmorphone-induced neuroexcitation when the logistic regression model was used and adjusted for the variables (Kullgren et al, 2013).
    C) SUBCUTANEOUS
    1) A 27-year-old woman was treated with a continuous intrathecal infusion of HYDROmorphone for chronic pain related to sickle-cell disease. During refill of the pump, 540 mg HYDROmorphone was inadvertently injected into a subcutaneous pocket above the pump. She immediately became sleepy and complained of nausea which persisted for several hours. A small amount of fluid was aspirated from around the pump. The patient was treated with 0.04 mg naloxone intravenously and started on a naloxone infusion of 0.1 mg/hr. The patient was monitored overnight, and only manifested slight drowsiness. The naloxone was discontinued and the intrathecal pump restarted the following morning and she was discharged (Coyne et al, 2004).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) A serum HYDROmorphone concentration of more than 0.01 mg/dL is considered lethal (No Authors Listed, 1988). In a series of fatalities in which HYDROmorphone was detected on autopsy, fatalities were reported at a HYDROmorphone concentration of 51 ng/mL or more (Meatherall et al, 2011; Wallage & Palmentier, 2006), but tolerant users with deaths attributed to natural causes had postmortem hydrocodone concentrations in the range of 75 ng/mL to 423 ng/mL (Wallage & Palmentier, 2006).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old boy ingested 3 or 4 capsules of controlled-release HYDROmorphone 24 mg and was found unresponsive the next morning. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. An autopsy revealed diffuse pulmonary edema and widespread acute aspiration-related bronchopneumonia. Postmortem concentrations of HYDROmorphone and HYDROmorphone-3-glucuronide were: peripheral blood: 57 ng/mL and 459 ng/mL; urine: 4460 ng/mL and 36,400 ng/mL; vitreous humor: 31 ng/mL and 40 ng/mL, respectively (Meatherall et al, 2011).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) HYDROmorphone is a semisynthetic opioid derived from morphine (Prod Info EXALGO(R) extended release oral tablets, 2010). It is 3 to 8 times the potency of morphine (Wallage & Palmentier, 2006). It functions principally as a mu-receptor agonist, with a weak affinity for kappa receptors (Prod Info EXALGO(R) extended release oral tablets, 2010).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects (Nelson, 2006).
    B) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION: Respiration, which is controlled mainly through medullary respiratory centers with peripheral input from chemoreceptors and other sources, is affected by opioids which produce inhibition at chemoreceptors via Mu (OP3) opioid receptors and in the medulla via mu and delta receptors. Tolerance develops more quickly to euphoria and other effects than to respiratory effects (White & Irvine, 1999).

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    3) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    4) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    5) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    6) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    7) Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, et al: Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference?. J Trauma 2004; 56(6):1191-1196.
    8) Camp NE: Drug- and toxin-induced Rhabdomyolysis. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5):481-482.
    9) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    10) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    11) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    12) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    13) Chung KS , Carson S , Glassman D , et al: Successful treatment of hydromorphone-induced neurotoxicity and hyperalgesia. Conn Med 2004; 68(9):547-549.
    14) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    15) Coyne PJ , Hansen LA , Laird J , et al: Massive hydromorphone dose delivered subcutaneously instead of intrathecally: guidelines for prevention and management of opioid, local anesthetic, and clonidine overdose. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004; 28(3):273-276.
    16) Criddle LM: Rhabdomyolysis. Pathophysiology, recognition, and management. Crit Care Nurse 2003; 23(6):14-22, 24-26, 28.
    17) Davison SN & Mayo PR : Pain management in chronic kidney disease: the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hydromorphone and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide in hemodialysis patients. J Opioid Manag 2008; 4(6):335-344.
    18) Edwards J, Rudy A, Wermeling D, et al: Hydromorphone transfer into breastmilk after intranasal administration. Phamracother 2003; 23(2):153-158.
    19) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    20) Erdman AR & Dart RC: Rhabdomyolysis. In: Dart RC, Caravati EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 123-127.
    21) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    22) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    23) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    24) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    25) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    26) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    27) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    28) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    29) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    30) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    31) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    32) Homsi E, Barreiro MF, Orlando JM, et al: Prophylaxis of acute renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Ren Fail 1997; 19(2):283-288.
    33) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    34) Howland MA: Opioid Antagonists. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    35) Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, & Marik PE: Bench-to-bedside review: Rhabdomyolysis -- an overview for clinicians. Crit Care 2005; 9(2):158-169.
    36) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    37) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    38) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    39) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    40) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    41) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    42) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    43) Kreitzman TR & Samuels SI: Epidural opioid infusion: an unusual problem. Anesthesiology 1990; 73(6):1272-1273.
    44) Kullgren J, Le V, & Wheeler W: Incidence of hydromorphone-induced neuroexcitation in hospice patients. J Palliat Med 2013; 16(10):1205-1209.
    45) Laine K, Kivisto KT, & Ojala-Karlsson P: Effect of activated charcoal on the pharmacokinetics of pholcodine, with special reference to delayed charcoal ingestion. Ther Drug Monitor 1997; 19:46-50.
    46) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    47) Lee RVBurrow GN & Ferris TF (Eds): Medical Complications During Pregnancy, 4th. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
    48) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    49) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    50) Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: The OROS(R) technology provides a steady 24-hour release of hydromorphone. Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. St. Louis, MO. 2013. Available from URL: http://www.exalgo.com/hcp/pharmacokinetics.aspx. As accessed 2013-10-08.
    51) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    52) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    53) Meatherall R, Lee C, & Phillips S: Accidental death from hydromorphone ingestion. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56 Suppl 1:S271-S274.
    54) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    55) Moon RE & Clements FM: Accidental epidural overdose of hydromorphone. Anesthesiology 1985; 63(2):238-239.
    56) Murray A & Hagen NA : Hydromorphone. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 29(5 Suppl):S57-S66.
    57) Murray S & Wooltorton E: Alcohol-associated rapid release of a long-acting opioid. CMAJ 2005; 173(7):756.
    58) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    59) Nelson L: Opioids. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    60) No Authors Listed: Fluoxetine + hydromorphone: serotonin syndrome?. Prescrire Int 2004; 13(70):57-.
    61) No Authors Listed: Leads from the MMWR. Dilaudid-related deaths--District of Columbia, 1987. JAMA 1988; 260(7):903-904.
    62) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    63) Parker Cote JL, King JD, Holstege CP, et al: Hydromorphone associated myoclonus following acute exposure: 2015 Annual Meeting of the North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology (NACCT). Clin Toxicol 2015; 53(7):669-669.
    64) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    65) Polderman KH: Acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27(12):1030-1033.
    66) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    67) Product Information: DILAUDID(R) IV, IM, subcutaneous injection , hydromorphone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection. Purdue Pharma L.P. (per FDA), Stamford, CT, 2011.
    68) Product Information: DILAUDID(R) and DILAUDID-HP(R) subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection, hydromorphone hydrochloride subcutaneous, IM, IV, injection. Purdue Pharma LP, Stamford, CT, 2008.
    69) Product Information: DILAUDID(R) oral liquid, tablets, hydromorphone hydrochloride oral liquid, tablets. Purdue Pharma L.P, Stamford, CT, 2009.
    70) Product Information: DILAUDID(R), DILAUDID-HP(R) injection, hydromorphone hydrochloride injection. Hospira, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    71) Product Information: DILAUDID-HP(R) IV, IM, subcutaneous injection, hydromorphone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection. Purdue Pharma L.P. (per FDA), Stamford, CT, 2011.
    72) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    73) Product Information: EXALGO(R) extended release oral tablets, hydromorphone hydrochloride extended release oral tablets. ALZA Corporation, Vacaville, CA, 2010.
    74) Product Information: EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, hydromorphone HCl oral extended-release tablets. Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Hazelwood, MO, 2013.
    75) Product Information: EXALGO(R) oral extended-release tablets, hydromorphone HCl oral extended-release tablets. Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Hazelwood, MO, 2014.
    76) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    77) Product Information: PALLADONE oral extended release capsules, hydromorphone HCl oral extended release capsules. Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P. (per FDA), Coventry, RI, 2014.
    78) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    79) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    80) Product Information: hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, hydromorphone HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection. Akorn, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    81) Product Information: hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets, hydromorphone HCl oral solution, oral tablets. Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L.P. (per DailyMed), Coventry, RI, 2013.
    82) Product Information: hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution, hydromorphone HCl oral tablets, oral solution. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (per DailyMed), Columbus, OH, 2012.
    83) Product Information: hydromorphone HCl rectal suppository, hydromorphone HCl rectal suppository. Perrigo(R) (per DailyMed), Minneapolis, MN, 2012.
    84) Product Information: hydromorphone hcl rectal suppositories, hydromorphone hcl rectal suppositories. Paddock Laboratories,Inc, Minneapolis, MN, 2005.
    85) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    86) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    87) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    88) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    89) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    90) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    91) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    92) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    93) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    94) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    95) Thwaites D , McCann S , & Broderick P : Hydromorphone neuroexcitation. J Palliat Med 2004; 7(4):545-550.
    96) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    97) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    98) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    99) Vanholder R, Sever MS, Erek E, et al: Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11(8):1553-1561.
    100) Wallage HR & Palmentier JP : Hydromorphone-related fatalities in ontario. J Anal Toxicol 2006; 30(3):202-209.
    101) Walter LA & Catenacci MH: Rhabdomyolysis. Hosp Physician 2008; 44(1):25-31.
    102) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    103) Watson WA , Steele MT , Muelleman RL , et al: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36(1-2):11-17.
    104) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998a; 36:11-17.
    105) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    106) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    107) White JM & Irvine RJ: Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose (review). Addiction 1999; 94:961-972.
    108) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    109) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    110) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    111) Zernikow B , Michel E , Craig F , et al: Pediatric palliative care: use of opioids for the management of pain. Paediatr Drugs 2009; 11(2):129-151.
    112) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    113) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.