MOBILE VIEW  | 

HYDROFLUORIC ACID

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Hydrogen fluoride is in the form of a gas at above 19.5 degrees C or a liquid at below 19.5 degrees C. It is easily dissolved in water to form hydrofluoric acid. Hydrofluoric acid is a unique acid, in that most of its toxicity is due to the anion, fluoride, and not to the cation, hydrogen. Most acids cause burns and necrosis from liberated hydrogen ions. Hydrofluoric acid is a weak acid (not highly dissociated into hydrogen and fluoride ions).
    B) Hydrofluoric acid consisting of 45% or 53% hydrogen fluoride has been marketed. However, higher concentrations have been reported to be in use in industry. Concentrated hydrofluoric acid is a strong acid. Upon dilution, hydrofluoric acid is only weakly acidic at 0.1M.
    C) This review encompasses both hydrogen fluoride, anhydrous and liquefied, and hydrofluoric acid, aqueous or in solution. Ammonium bifluoride (contained in aluminum wheel and tire cleaners) reacts in the stomach to release hydrogen fluoride and fluoride ions, and is discussed in a separate management.

Specific Substances

    1) HYDROFLUORIC ACID
    2) Fluohydric acid
    3) HF
    4) Hydrogen fluoride
    5) CAS 7664-39-3
    6) CAS 676-99-3
    7) CAS 7783-70-2
    8) FLUORIC ACID, SOLUTION
    9) HEXAFLUOROKIESELSAIURE (GERMAN)
    10) HEXAFLUOROSILICIC ACID
    11) HYDROFLUORIDE, SOLUTION
    12) HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, SOLUTION
    13) PHOSPHONODIFLUORIDIC ACID, METHYL-
    14) SULFUR FLUROIDE (TETRAFLUORIDE)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) F-H

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Hydrogen fluoride is in the form of a gas above 19.5 degrees C and a liquid below 19.5 degrees C. It is easily dissolved in water to form hydrofluoric acid. Hydrofluoric acid consisting of 45% or 53% hydrogen fluoride is being marketed. However, higher concentrations have been reported to be in use in industry. Concentrated hydrofluoric acid is a strong acid. Upon dilution, hydrofluoric acid is only weakly acidic at 0.1M (ACGIH, 1991; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Raffle et al, 1994).
    2) Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is highly associated in the liquid state (as indicated by the high boiling point) and in the vapor phase at normal room temperature (however, at 1 atm and 80 degrees C, it is monomeric) (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    B) SOURCES
    1) Hydrofluoric acid is available in chemically pure (CP) and technical, 38%, 47%, 53% and 70% grades (Lewis, 1996).
    C) USES
    1) Hydrogen fluoride is used as a catalyst in the petroleum industry, for various fluorination processes, in separating uranium isotopes, in analytical and dye chemistry, in the production of fluorine, and in the production of aluminum fluoride; it is also used to stop the fermentation in brewing (ACGIH, 1991; Budavari, 1996; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Sittig, 1991).
    2) Hydrofluoric acid is widely used in many industrial settings including the production of integrated circuits, fluorides, plastics, germicides, insecticides and in etching and cleaning silicone, glass, metal, stone and porcelain. Hydrofluoric acid is also used in enameling and galvanizing iron, pickling stainless steel, in the production of gasoline, in the production of aluminum, and in adjusting pH in oil well operations and working silk (ACGIH, 1991; Budavari, 1996; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Sittig, 1991).
    3) Hydrofluoric acid can be found in automotive cleaning products (eg, rust removers, aluminum brighteners) and though present in relatively low concentrations, toxicity can result from prolonged exposure (Garrettson & Siegel, 1989). It can also be found in higher concentrations (up to 20%). These products can cause severe chemical burns (Reeb-Whitaker et al, 2015).
    4) Hydrofluoric acid can be found in many domestic products including air conditioner cleaners, aluminum cleaners, wheel cleaners, and rust removers. It is also found in many carpet, wall, and tub cleaners (Stuke et al, 2008).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Hydrogen fluoride (HF) is an irritant gas used in chemical manufacturing or a solution used for rust removal, glass etching, and silicon semiconductor chip manufacturing.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Highly electronegative fluoride ion penetrates tissues deeply and binds calcium leading to hypocalcemia (and hypomagnesemia), tissue burns (rare) and cell death.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Poisoning is uncommon with mostly minor and moderate outcomes, but may be life-threatening. Usually occurs via dermal route but occasionally ocular, ingestion or inhalation. Severe poisoning most often occurs after ingestion, but may develop from a dermal exposure of a large surface area and/or to a high concentration product.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: DERMAL: Exposure can result in delayed, unrelenting, severe pain without visible signs of injury. OCULAR: Exposure can cause mucosal irritation. INHALATION: Inhalation of low concentrations may cause prompt mucosal irritation, dyspnea, cough and wheezing. INGESTION: GI irritation (ie, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysphagia, abdominal pain) may be expected following ingestion.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: DERMAL: Tissue destruction or necrosis may be caused by dermal exposures to large amounts of or highly concentrated solutions of HF, and may result in systemic poisoning. OCULAR: Ocular exposure to liquid HF produces rapid pain, conjunctival injection, corneal abrasion or ulceration, progressive corneal vascularization and stroma scarring, and corneal opacification. Permanent visual deficits may occur in severe cases. INGESTION: Significant gastrointestinal burns may be expected after significant exposure. Painful necrotic lesions, hemorrhagic gastritis, and pancreatitis have been reported after significant exposure. Ingestion or inhalation may cause systemic poisoning with hypocalcemia, ventricular dysrhythmias (prolonged QTc, torsades de pointes), hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, acidosis and cardiac arrest. Cardiac toxicity generally manifests within 6 hours of an exposure. INHALATION: Dyspnea, bronchospasm (with abnormal PFTs and hypoxia), chemical pneumonitis, pulmonary edema (can be hemorrhagic), tracheobronchitis, upper airway obstruction, chemical burns (larynx, trachea, bronchi) , ARDS, and respiratory failure may occur following inhalation. Ingestion of more than 30 mL of a 5% solution can be fatal.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the possible carcinogenic activity of fluoride in humans.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Measure serial serum or ionized calcium levels frequently (every 30 minutes) following ingestions or with large dermal exposures.
    B) Perform serial ECGs and cardiac monitoring for moderate to severe exposures. Follow QTc prolongation as a marker for hypocalcemia and risk for dysrhythmias.
    C) Obtain serum electrolytes (including magnesium) and creatinine.
    D) Endoscopic evaluation for corrosive injury should be performed after ingestion, ideally within 12 hours.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Rule out corrosive GI tract injury with GI consult and endoscopy. Evaluate for and correct hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Systemic toxicity with severe hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, acidosis and ventricular dysrhythmia can develop after ingestion or rectal instillation of small amounts, after inhalation, or after dermal exposure to large surface areas or high concentration products. Begin appropriate respiratory and hemodynamic support for critically ill patients. The mainstays of therapy are aggressive correction of hypocalcemia, treatment of hypomagnesemia and avoidance of acidosis. Give empiric calcium. Maintain serum calcium levels in high-normal range. Give appropriate analgesia. If sudden death is avoided in the first 24 hours, prognosis is good; although recovery may be prolonged. Treat patients with dysrhythmias or hypotension with calcium chloride (via central line or large bore catheter) and sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mEq/kg IV to serum pH of 7.5. In cases of cardiac arrest, give calcium chloride 3 to 5 g IV bolus and sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mEq/kg IV to serum pH of 7.5, vasopressors and defibrillation in addition to advanced cardiac life support measures.
    2) INGESTION: Large amounts of oral calcium and/or IV calcium chloride immediately. Administer sufficient intravenous calcium to maintain serum calcium levels at high-normal. Patients also may require magnesium supplementation. Animal models suggest that acidemia may worsen prognosis.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: For ingestions, immediately give a substance containing calcium (milk, calcium carbonate antacids) or magnesium (magnesium containing antacids or laxatives). No activated charcoal. Do NOT induce emesis. HOSPITAL: No activated charcoal. If very recent ingestion of large volume, aspirate with soft nasogastric tube and then instill calcium or magnesium solutions (ie, antacids, laxatives).
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Perform early in patients with severe intoxication after ingestion or inhalation.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) Calcium in high doses (calcium gluconate or chloride) binds the fluoride atoms to avert tissue injury and systemic fluorosis.
    F) HYPOCALCEMIA
    1) Administer calcium empirically to any patient with a potentially severe exposure while awaiting laboratory results. Monitor serum calcium. Repeat calcium replenishment as needed to maintain calcium concentrations in the high-normal range. CALCIUM CHLORIDE: ADULT DOSE: 1 g (10 mL of 10% solution) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 10 to 25 mg/kg (0.1 to 0.25 mL/kg) per dose up to a maximum single dose of 5 mL (500 mg) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes. Treat patients with dysrhythmias or hypotension with calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mEq/kg IV to serum pH of 7.5.
    G) HYPOMAGNESEMIA
    1) Correct known and suspected hypomagnesemia with intravenous magnesium sulfate. DOSE: ADULT: 1 to 2 g diluted in 250 mL D5W or NS infused IV, may be repeated as necessary. PEDIATRIC: 25 to 50 mg/kg IV infusion over 30 to 60 minutes; repeat dose as necessary; max 2 g/dose. Monitor serum magnesium. Repeat as needed.
    H) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) Advanced cardiac life support measures. Give calcium chloride 3 to 5 g IV bolus and sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mEq/kg IV to a serum pH of 7.5, vasopressors and defibrillation.
    I) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Fluoride is removed by dialysis, but patients with severe toxicity will likely be hemodynamically unstable.
    J) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Only for asymptomatic patients with mild dermal exposure controlled with an analgesics or those who have no symptoms after the exposure.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: All intentional ingestions and patients with significant exposures (dysrhythmias, hypotension, pulmonary complications or deep tissue destruction) should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Patients who require intra-arterial perfusion should be admitted with their arterial catheter in place in case repeat doses are needed.
    3) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with pain not responding to topical treatment, patients with significant inhalation exposure, or any patients ingesting HF.
    K) PITFALLS
    1) Calcium chloride may cause vascular sclerosis if administered via peripheral veins, and extravasation may cause tissue destruction. Use calcium gluconate for subcutaneous injections and for small peripheral veins. Anhydrous HF has a high affinity for water and produces considerable heat as it dissolves. Therefore, a thermal burn may complicate the chemical burn. Dysrhythmias can develop abruptly, especially after ingestion; treatment with intravenous calcium is often necessary before laboratory confirmation of hypocalcemia can be obtained.
    L) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Corrosive effects occur almost immediately. Severity depends on the HF concentration. HF is readily absorbed in the upper respiratory tract. Absorption of salts depends on size and solubility. Absorption is a pH-dependent event. The acidic stomach favors the associated HF, which is readily absorbed across the gastric mucosa. Volume of distribution is 0.5 to 0.7 L/kg. Fluoride is excreted by the kidney.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Supportive care, nebulized bronchodilators, and give calcium gluconate nebulizer treatments.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Calcium gluconate 2.5 to 5% nebulizer treatments. Nebulized beta agonists for bronchospasm, humidified oxygen. Intravenous calcium if systemic toxicity or hypocalcemia develop.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Remove from inhalation source and administer oxygen.
    2) HOSPITAL: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen with assisted ventilation as required. Exposed skin and eyes should be copiously washed with water. Mild inhalational symptoms may be treated with 2.5% calcium gluconate nebulization
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Normal saline eye irrigation (NOT calcium solution). Give analgesia.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Irrigate eyes with copious amounts of normal saline; NOT a calcium solution. Slit lamp exam and ophthalmology consult.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Irrigate eyes with copious saline or water.
    2) HOSPITAL: Irrigate exposed eyes with normal saline. Carefully evaluate for eye damage; exposure to dilute solutions may result in delayed signs and symptoms of ocular damage. The patient should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist following appropriate decontamination.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Thoroughly irrigate skin immediately after exposure. Patients with early decontamination do well. Patients with pain should be treated with topical calcium therapy. TOPICAL - Treat with calcium gluconate or carbonate gel (1 g calcium gluconate in 40 g (about 40 mL) water-soluble lubricant = 2.5% gel; alternative is 10 10-g tablets crushed to fine powder + 20 mL water-soluble lubricant mixed into a slurry; apply thin coat to burn, then place hand in glove containing 10 mL slurry for 4 hours). SUBCUTANEOUS - Inject 0.5 mL/cm(2) with 10% calcium gluconate for topical treatment failures (not commonly used).
    b) Do not use calcium chloride for bier block procedures. Calcium chloride is irritating to the tissues and may cause injury.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Patients with pain not responding to topical calcium can be treated with regional venous or arterial perfusion. These methods are particularly effective for HF exposures involving the digits. BIER BLOCK - Inject IV 10 to 40 mL calcium gluconate in 50 mL normal saline for 20 minutes. ARTERIAL - 10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium gluconate in 50 mL D5W. Infuse over 4 hours via radial or brachial artery. The arterial catheter may be placed in normal position (not inverted).
    b) Do not use calcium chloride for bier block procedures. Calcium chloride is irritating to the tissues and may cause injury.
    3) DECONTAMINATION
    a) PREHOSPITAL: For dermal exposure, remove clothing and irrigate skin thoroughly with water.
    b) HOSPITAL: Irrigate exposed skin. Remove all exposed clothing and jewelry taking necessary precautions to prevent secondary exposure to health care providers. Irrigate exposed areas promptly with copious amounts of water for at least 30 minutes.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) INGESTION: ADULT: Electrolyte imbalance, dysrhythmias and death have been reported after 2 to 3 ounces of 6 to 8% HF. CHILD: The minimum toxic dose for a 10 kg child is 50 mg.
    B) INHALATION: 30 ppm is considered immediately dangerous to life and health. Estimates of the lowest lethal concentrations for HF range from 50 to 250 ppm for a 5 minute exposure.
    C) DERMAL: Severe systemic toxicity and death have been reported following 2.5% body surface area (BSA) burns from 100% HF, 8% BSA burns from 70% HF, and 11% BSA burns from 23% HF.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Hydrogen fluoride (HF) is an irritant gas used in chemical manufacturing or a solution used for rust removal, glass etching, and silicon semiconductor chip manufacturing.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Highly electronegative fluoride ion penetrates tissues deeply and binds calcium leading to hypocalcemia (and hypomagnesemia), tissue burns (rare) and cell death.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Poisoning is uncommon with mostly minor and moderate outcomes, but may be life-threatening. Usually occurs via dermal route but occasionally ocular, ingestion or inhalation. Severe poisoning most often occurs after ingestion, but may develop from a dermal exposure of a large surface area and/or to a high concentration product.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: DERMAL: Exposure can result in delayed, unrelenting, severe pain without visible signs of injury. OCULAR: Exposure can cause mucosal irritation. INHALATION: Inhalation of low concentrations may cause prompt mucosal irritation, dyspnea, cough and wheezing. INGESTION: GI irritation (ie, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysphagia, abdominal pain) may be expected following ingestion.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: DERMAL: Tissue destruction or necrosis may be caused by dermal exposures to large amounts of or highly concentrated solutions of HF, and may result in systemic poisoning. OCULAR: Ocular exposure to liquid HF produces rapid pain, conjunctival injection, corneal abrasion or ulceration, progressive corneal vascularization and stroma scarring, and corneal opacification. Permanent visual deficits may occur in severe cases. INGESTION: Significant gastrointestinal burns may be expected after significant exposure. Painful necrotic lesions, hemorrhagic gastritis, and pancreatitis have been reported after significant exposure. Ingestion or inhalation may cause systemic poisoning with hypocalcemia, ventricular dysrhythmias (prolonged QTc, torsades de pointes), hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, acidosis and cardiac arrest. Cardiac toxicity generally manifests within 6 hours of an exposure. INHALATION: Dyspnea, bronchospasm (with abnormal PFTs and hypoxia), chemical pneumonitis, pulmonary edema (can be hemorrhagic), tracheobronchitis, upper airway obstruction, chemical burns (larynx, trachea, bronchi) , ARDS, and respiratory failure may occur following inhalation. Ingestion of more than 30 mL of a 5% solution can be fatal.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) In chemical manufacturing where a mixture of fluorine, fluorides, and hydrogen fluoride may be present in air, conjunctival hyperemia in the palpebral fissure occurs commonly, irritation of the eyelids occurs occasionally, and corneal disturbance occurs rarely (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    2) CORNEAL DAMAGE: Corneal epithelial defects may occur after ocular exposure (Sadove et al, 1990; Bentur et al, 1993). In severe cases corneal erosion and necrosis may develop. Corneal opacification may develop several days after exposure (McCulley et al, 1983; Hatai et al, 1986).
    3) IRRITATION - Eye irritation is common after exposure to fumes (Wing et al, 1991).
    a) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, ocular irritation/pain and red eyes were observed in 46 (11.2%) and 14 (3.4%) patients, respectively. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).
    b) Hydrofluoric acid was a severe eye irritant in humans using the standard Draize test (RTECS , 2001).
    c) Conjunctival injection and chemosis may develop after splash exposure (Sadove et al, 1990; Bentur et al, 1993). A severe bilateral keratoconjunctivitis was reported following a splash injury with 3% HF; symptoms resolved following frequent eye rinses and antiinflammatory and cycloplegic eye drops (Garrido et al, 2001; Sanz-Gallen et al, 2001).
    4) SEQUELAE: Following liquid or vapor eye exposures, injuries may result in prolonged or permanent visual defects or total loss of vision (Martin & Muller, 2002; Matsuno, 1996).
    5) ANIMAL STUDIES: Mild conjunctivitis developed after exposure to 0.5%, severe conjunctivitis lasting 65 days after exposure to 8%, and immediate corneal necrosis after exposure to 20% solutions (McCulley et al, 1983).
    a) Progressive vascularization and scarring of the corneal stroma are induced in rabbits with ocular HF burns (Carney et al, 1974).
    3.4.5) NOSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) IRRITATION - Mucus membrane irritation may result from inhalation of fumes.
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) High concentration (greater than 20%) HF is highly corrosive and contact with the oral cavity may cause deep, painful, necrotic lesions and ulceration (Menchel & Dunn, 1984; Chela et al, 1989). Ingestions of lower concentration products may not produce oral mucosal injuries, but severe systemic toxicity may occur without local injury. Mucous membrane irritation is common after exposure to fumes; burning sensation to the tongue may occur (Trevino et al, 2001; Wing et al, 1991).
    2) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, throat irritation was observed in 19 (4.6%) patients. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia with associated QTc prolongation and torsades de pointes and ventricular dysrhythmias including bigeminy, ventricular tachycardia, refractory ventricular fibrillation, and cardiac arrest have been reported following ingestion and dermal exposure. Cardiac toxicity generally manifests within 6 hours of an exposure (Dalamaga et al, 2008; Wedler et al, 2005; Cordero et al, 2004; Speranza et al, 2002; Stremski et al, 1991; Mullett et al, 1987; Tepperman, 1980; Greco et al, 1988; Buckingham, 1988; Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986; Bordelon et al, 1993; Klasner et al, 1996; Hung et al, 1998; Perry, 2001). In a case of ingestion of one cupful of rust removal agent, a 35-year-old developed obvious tented T wave on ECG, followed by an extreme high T wave due to a relative hyperkalemia; this resolved following treatment with calcium gluconate injections, calcium carbonate via NG tube and an insulin injection (Yu-Jang et al, 2001). In another case of ingestion of 8 oz of rust remover, an 82-year-old woman developed ventricular fibrillation, possibly precipitated by a long QT interval secondary to hypocalcemia, approximately 6 hours after the ingestion (Rivera et al, 2002).
    1) A delayed, rapid development of hyperkalemia is often suggested as the etiology of VT/VF. The rise in potassium is coincident with the development of fluoride-cardiotoxicity. However, hyperkalemia alone is not sufficient to explain VT/VF and the rise in serum potassium is often only modest.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old man developed severe fluoride intoxication and recurrent ventricular fibrillation 3.5 hours following occupational exposure of 71% hydrofluoric acid to 7% of his total body surface area. Following immediate parenteral administration of calcium and magnesium sulfate, his serum electrolyte levels normalized; however, a urine sample, obtained 8 hours postexposure, showed a fluoride concentration of 5800 mcmol/L (upper reference limit is 105 mcmol/L). Hemodialysis was performed and, 8 hours later, the patient's urine fluoride concentration had decreased to 3850 mcmol/L and his ventricular fibrillation had resolved. Thirty hours postexposure, continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was started and continued for 48 hours. Two hours following the end of CVVHD treatment (80 hours post-exposure), his urine fluoride concentration was 260 mcmol/L. One month postexposure, the patient was discharged (Bjornhagen et al, 2003).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man, who received third degree burns to 5% of his total body surface area after being splashed in the face with hydrofluoric acid solution, complained of chest pain 5 minutes postexposure. Thirty minutes after the accident, he developed cardiopulmonary arrest. Initial laboratory tests revealed hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia (4.9 mg/dL and 6.2 mEq/L, respectively). Despite aggressive resuscitative measures, the patient died 1.5 hours after the accident (Takase et al, 2004).
    d) CASE REPORT: After being splashed on the right thigh with 20% hydrofluoric acid, a 36-year-old man experienced a 3% total body surface area first-degree burn. He immediately washed and applied 2.5% calcium gluconate gel to the affected area. On presentation, all serum electrolytes were normal, and he had mild leukocytosis and mild metabolic acidosis. Despite treatment with a bolus injection of 10% calcium gluconate and 20% magnesium sulfate, he developed sinus bradycardia (50 to 56 beats/min) in the ICU. At this time, he was administered 10% calcium gluconate and 15% potassium chloride. Approximately 16 hours after exposure, he lost consciousness with tetany of right upper limb for about 1 minute. An ECG revealed progressive bradycardia and ventricular arrest. At this time, laboratory analysis revealed hypocalcemia (calcium, 6.9 mg/dL), hypomagnesemia (magnesium, 1.41 mg/dL), and hypokalemia (potassium, 2.6 mmol/L). Following resuscitation and treatment with IV 10% calcium chloride, 10% calcium glucose, 20% magnesium sulfate, and 15% potassium chloride, he was stabilized and returned to sinus bradycardia, which persisted from 9 to 49 hours postexposure. Overall, 112 mEq IV calcium, 97.2 mEq IV magnesium, and 142 mEq of IV and oral potassium were administered and he gradually recovered and was discharged after 4 days of hospitalization (Wu et al, 2010).
    B) ISCHEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Histologic myocardial damage has been described in fatal oral and dermal exposures (Mayer & Gross, 1985; Greendyke & Hodge, 1964).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease died from myocardial infarction after he sustained an 11% body surface area burn from 70% HF complicated by hypotension, respiratory failure and hypocalcemia (Lopez et al, 1994).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORTS
    1) PEDIATRIC: A 14-month-old boy who sustained 11% body surface area full thickness burns from a product that contained between 8% and 23% hydrofluoric acid developed hypotension associated with hypocalcemia and acidosis (Bordelon et al, 1993).
    2) A 59-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease developed hypotension after he sustained an 11% body surface area burn from 70% HF complicated by respiratory failure, hypocalcemia and malignant ventricular dysrhythmias (Lopez et al, 1994).
    3) PEDIATRIC: A 7-year-old girl with dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid and burns over 10% total body surface area, (serum calcium level 5.5 mg/dL) suffered hypotension, pulmonary edema and four cardiac arrests requiring extensive resuscitation. She was pronounced dead approximately 6 hours after the exposure (Speranza et al, 2002).
    D) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old man presented to the ED with nausea, weakness, and pleuritic chest pain 1 hour after ingesting blue liquid thought to be a sports drink. He had difficulty swallowing and his oropharynx appeared erythematous without edema or ulceration. An initial ECG revealed sinus tachycardia with a QRS complex of 110 ms and prominent T-waves and an arterial blood gas indicated metabolic acidosis (pH 7.28, pCO2 29, pO2 209, HCO3 13). Initial laboratory values indicated a potassium level of 5.7 mmol/L, a calcium level of less than 4 mmol/L, and a magnesium level of 0.7 mmol/L. A repeat ECG, conducted 30 minutes later, showed QRS complex widening (152 ms), QT interval prolongation (742 ms), and peaked T-waves. The patient's metabolic acidosis and electrolyte and cardiac abnormalities resolved within 12 hours after receiving supportive treatment (4 grams calcium gluconate, 2 grams calcium chloride, 10 grams magnesium sulfate, 400 mEq sodium bicarbonate, and 15 mmol sodium phosphate IV). Further evaluation, using flame ionization and atomic absorption, identified the ingested liquid as hydrofluoric acid (Holstege et al, 2005).
    3.5.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CARDIAC DYSRHYTHMIAS
    a) In dog studies, death following HF exposure was usually the result of delayed sudden cardiovascular collapse with ventricular fibrillation that combined with irreversible hyperkalemia, and was unresponsive to vasopressors (Cummings & McIvor, 1988; McIvor & Cummings, 1987; McIvor et al, 1987).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dyspnea is common following inhalation. Bronchospasm may occur (Wing et al, 1991; Sadove et al, 1990).
    b) HYPOXIA occurred in 17.4% of patients with oxygenation measurement following a HF spill (Wing et al, 1991).
    c) PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS: Abnormalities included decreased FEV1 in 42.3% and decreased FEV1/FVC in 16.9% of patients with PFTs tested following a HF spill (Wing et al, 1991).
    d) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, dyspnea was observed in 23 (5.6%) patients. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).
    e) CASE REPORT: Following inhalation of fumes from a glass etching cream for approximately one hour, a 41-year-old man presented to the emergency department with throat irritation, burning chest pain, and dyspnea. The glass etching cream, that the patient was using to remove scratches from his glasses, was found to contain 28% to 39% ammonium bifluoride and sodium bifluoride. At presentation his vital signs were normal, oxygen saturation was 100%, laboratory data (ie, CBC, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function) were within normal limits, there were no ECG abnormalities (QRS 84, QTc 440), and a chest x-ray indicated clear lungs. Physical exam revealed pharyngeal erythema. Treatment was initiated with 2.5% nebulized calcium gluconate resulting in immediate improvement in symptoms; however, continued recurrence of pain and dyspnea necessitated a total of 4 rounds of therapy over a 12-hour period. During therapy, the patient's QTc interval peaked at 458; however, he became asymptomatic, with normal ECG intervals, and was discharged (Kessler et al, 2015).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hemorrhagic pulmonary edema has been observed after significant inhalation, ingestion, and dermal exposures (Watson et al, 1973) Mayer & Guelich, 1986; (Chan et al, 1987; Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986; Kleinfeld, 1965; Takase et al, 2004).
    b) CASE REPORT/PEDIATRIC: A 7-year-old girl with dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid and burns over 10% total body surface area, (serum calcium level 5.5 mg/dL) suffered hypotension, pulmonary edema and four cardiac arrests requiring extensive resuscitation. She was pronounced dead approximately 6 hours after the exposure (Speranza et al, 2002).
    C) PNEUMONITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe chemical pneumonitis may occur following inhalation (Klasner et al, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT - Death due to severe pulmonary lesions occurred 3 hours after sustaining an inhalation and dermal injury (Chela et al, 1989).
    D) BRONCHITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: One case of tracheobronchitis occurring several days after a dermal exposure has been reported (Braun et al, 1984). Respiratory injury in the form of tracheitis has been reported following inhalation and possible ingestion (Klasner et al, 1996). Immediate upper airway irritation and shortness of breath have been reported following a one minute inhalation exposure to fumes from an anhydrous hydrofluoric acid spill in an enclosed room (Boyer et al, 2000).
    E) COUGH
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, cough was observed in 29 (7.1%) patients. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).
    F) DISORDER OF RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION may occur after ingestion or inhalation secondary to laryngeal edema.
    G) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Larynx, trachea, and bronchial tree burns were reported in a fatal case of HF inhalation (Chela et al, 1989).
    H) REACTIVE AIRWAYS DYSFUNCTION SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman experienced burning of her eyes, nose, and mouth, chest tightness, and dyspnea approximately 2 minutes following exposure to hydrofluoric acid fumes while using a rust remover (containing an aqueous solution of 8% to 9% hydrogen fluoride) to clean a toilet bowl. Over the next several weeks, she continued to have persistent wheezing, particularly with exertion. Ultimately the patient was diagnosed with reactive airways dysfunction syndrome that was attributed to her exposure to the rust remover (Franzblau & Sahakian, 2003).
    I) RESPIRATORY FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Three soldiers presented with dyspnea that progressed to acute lung injury and hypoxemic respiratory failure after an automatic fire suppression system in their military vehicle was damaged by a rocket-propelled grenade, releasing hydrogen fluoride gas. Despite supportive care, all 3 patients died within 24 hours of exposure. Several weeks later, 2 more soldiers presented with dyspnea after similar exposure to hydrogen fluoride gas. Both patients were treated with nebulized sodium bicarbonate in the prehospital setting. Both patients developed respiratory failure and acute lung injury and were treated with nebulized calcium chloride every 4 hours, IV calcium boluses, and positive pressure ventilation. The first patient gradually recovered following supportive care and was extubated a week after injury. The second patient developed hospital acquired pneumonia and received tracheostomy. He also recovered gradually and was removed from mechanical ventilation 3 weeks after injury (Zierold & Chauviere, 2012).
    b) CASE REPORT - A 65-year-old man developed dyspnea that progressed to respiratory failure after being severely sprayed in the face with liquefied hydrogen fluoride. Despite resuscitative measures, the patient developed cardio-pulmonary arrest and died approximately 1 hour and 40 minutes post-exposure. Initial laboratory analysis showed a potassium level of 6.2 mEq/L and a calcium level of 4.9 mEq/L (albumin correction value 5.1). An autopsy revealed facial necrosis, gray and green membranes of the lips, conjunctiva, and nose, exfoliated and turbid corneas bilaterally, and severely congestive and edematous lungs bilaterally (Dote et al, 2003).
    c) CASE REPORT - A 40-year-old man who experienced inhalation exposure to hydrofluoric acid (HF) while retrieving a machine part from a container containing concentrated HF and sulfuric acid presented 9 hours after the exposure with severe hypoxia and metabolic acidosis (pH 7.31, HCO3 17). The patient was intubated and treated with nebulized calcium gluconate 2.5%. The patient's recovery was complicated by respiratory failure, multiple pneumonias, a pulmonary embolus, and pulmonary hypertension. Twelve weeks after exposure, the patient was breathing via a tracheostomy and was transferred to a rehabilitation center (Tsonis et al, 2008).
    3.6.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Although one study reported a subchronic exposure of 25 mg/m(3) for 6 hours a day over a 30 day period to be lethal to rats, several other studies showed acute exposures up to 176 mg/m(3) of fluoride particulates could be tolerated in rats. This absence of injury in rat lung was attributed to the protective scrubbing effect of the upper respiratory airway and nasal turbinates (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, headache was observed in 16 (3.9%) patients. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA, VOMITING AND DIARRHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Spontaneous vomiting is common following exposure (Klasner et al, 1996). Ingestion of hydrofluoric acid may cause painful necrotic lesions of the oral mucosa and the GI tract depending on concentration.
    b) Persistent nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were reported following dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid (Wedler et al, 2005).
    B) GASTRIC HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hemorrhagic gastritis may occur following significant ingestions (Menchel & Dunn, 1984; Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986; Kleinfeld, 1965).
    C) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Significant gastrointestinal burns are NOT expected after taste ingestions of low concentration products, but may occur after ingestion of high concentrations (greater than 20%) or deliberate ingestions (i.e., suicidal attempts by adults) of large amounts of low or high concentration products. Caustic injury to the esophagus, stomach and duodenum with sloughing and necrosis has been reported following ingestions (Menchel & Dunn, 1984; Chela et al, 1989; Kao et al, 1999; Chu et al, 2001). In one case, ingestion of about 50 mL of a rust removal agent (12% HF and 16% ammonium bifluoride) resulted in severe erosive esophagitis and gastritis (Chu et al, 2001).
    b) A 43-year-old man developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, electrolyte abnormalities, and cardiac dysrhythmias after intentionally ingesting a rust remover containing hydrofluoric acid. Despite aggressive resuscitative measures, the patient died 8 hours post-ingestion. Autopsy findings showed the presence of severe erosive cheilitis, glossitis, esophagitis, and gastritis (Cordero et al, 2004).
    D) PANCREATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) HEMORRHAGIC PANCREATITIS has been reported at autopsy following ingestion (Menchel & Dunn, 1984).
    E) BURN CAUSED BY HYDROFLUORIC ACID
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) RECTAL
    1) CASE REPORT - A severe rectosigmoid burn with perforation of the sigmoid colon was reported following rectal administration of Whink(R) automotive rust remover, containing 6% to 8% hydrofluoric acid (Foster & Barone, 1989).
    2) CASE REPORT: In a fatal case, a 51-year-old self-administered a cleaning solution containing 8% hydrofluoric acid and 6% phosphoric acid rectally. The patient developed a gray eschar extending from the anus to 25 cm from the anal verge as seen on rigid sigmoidoscopy. When signs of peritonitis developed, the patient underwent surgery where a resected segment of bowel was covered almost circumferentially with hemorrhagic, necrotic fibroadipose tissue and fibrous exudate. Death occurred due to a saddle pulmonary embolus (Beveridge et al, 2000).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old man presented with rectal pain and bloody diarrhea, hypocalcemia and leukocytosis 36 hours after administering an HF enema (unknown concentration and volume). He was treated with calcium carbonate enemas.
    a) He underwent partial sigmoid resection for treatment of acute colitis with rectal and sigmoid ulceration and necrosis and peritonitis. Five months later he presented with rectal stricture requiring resection (Cappell & Simon, 1993).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old man who fell into a tank containing 10% to 12% hydrofluoric acid and anhydrous ammonia developed elevated transaminase levels (AST and LDH between 1,000 and 1,400 International Units/L) for the first few days after injury (Sadove et al, 1990). These effects were likely secondary to the patient's overall condition rather than primary liver injury. Values returned to normal by 25 days postexposure.

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Metabolic acidosis is an important marker of fluoride toxicity, and is likely to be an important determinant of the subsequent course. Metabolic acidosis increases the tissue/intracellular delivery of fluoride and decreases renal elimination of fluoride.
    b) CASE REPORT: Oral ingestion resulted in severe acidosis and death in one case (Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986).
    c) CASE REPORT: Metabolic acidosis was described in a 60-year-old man with extensive chemical burns following a splash exposure of 70% hydrofluoric acid solution while it was being unloaded from a tanker (pH 7.21, pO2 150 mmHg, pCO2 26 mmHg, HCO3 15 mEq/L) (Chan et al, 1987).
    d) CASE REPORT/PEDIATRIC: A 14-month-old boy who sustained 11% body surface area full thickness burns from a product that contained between 8% and 23% hydrofluoric acid developed hypotension and recurrent ventricular fibrillation associated with hypocalcemia and acidosis (pH 7.31) (Bordelon et al, 1993).
    e) CASE REPORT: Metabolic acidosis (pH 7.28, pCO2 29, pO2 209, HCO3 13) occurred in a 47-year-old man who ingested blue liquid thought to be a sports drink. Further evaluation of the liquid, via flame ionization and atomic absorption, identified it as hydrofluoric acid. The patient recovered with supportive care (Holstege et al, 2005).
    f) CASE REPORT - Metabolic acidosis (pH 7.31, HCO3 17) occurred in a 40-year-old man who experienced inhalation exposure to hydrofluoric acid (HF) while retrieving a machine part from a container containing concentrated HF and sulfuric acid. He presented 9 hours after the exposure with severe hypoxia requiring intubation. The patient's recovery was complicated by respiratory failure, multiple pneumonias, and a pulmonary embolus. Twelve weeks after exposure, the patient was breathing via a tracheostomy and was transferred to a rehabilitation center (Tsonis et al, 2008).
    g) CASE REPORT: Mild metabolic acidosis with respiratory compensation (pH: 7.414; PO2: 105 mmHg; PCO2: 30.5 mmHg; HCO3: 19.1 mmol/L) and a 3% total body surface area first-degree burn developed in a 36-year-old man after being splashed on the right thigh with 20% hydrofluoric acid. He immediately washed and applied 2.5% calcium gluconate gel to the affected area. On presentation, all serum electrolytes were normal, and he had mild leukocytosis. He later developed hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, bradycardia, and asystole 16 hours after exposure. Following resuscitation and treatment with IV 10% calcium chloride, 10% calcium glucose, 20% magnesium sulfate, and 15% potassium chloride, he was stabilized and returned to sinus bradycardia, which persisted from 9 to 49 hours postexposure. Overall, 112 mEq IV calcium, 97.2 mEq IV magnesium, and 142 mEq of IV and oral potassium were administered and he gradually recovered and was discharged after 4 days of hospitalization (Wu et al, 2010).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, dermal irritation/pain, erythema/flushing, and edema were observed in 206 (50.4%), 74 (18.1%), 26 (6.4%) patients, respectively. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).
    B) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SUMMARY: Brief dermal exposure to products with less than 20% hydrofluoric acid typically does not cause clinically apparent burns (Perry, 2001). Hydrogen fluoride burns may cause little initial pain, especially with low concentration forms of the acid. It readily penetrates the skin and mucous membranes. The associated hydrogen fluoride penetrates into the deep subdermal layers and causes severe destruction and liquefaction necrosis. Insidious onset of erythema progressing to vesiculation, ulceration, and finally tissue necrosis occurs. Eventually a characteristically severe throbbing pain sets in, which may not be adequately controlled by parenteral narcotics. The pain is thought to result from the release of cellular potassium and intense stimulation of nerve endings (Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Iverson et al, 1971; Dibbell et al, 1970; CHEMINFO , 1990; Edinburg & Swift, 1989; Asvesti et al, 1997; Garrido et al, 2001; Mangion et al, 2001).
    1) A hallmark of dermal exposure to low concentrations of HF is pain that is out of proportion to the physical examination. Severe pain may be obvious, while only erythema of the exposed skin is observed (Perry, 2001).
    2) Severity and rapidity of onset of signs and symptoms depends on the concentration, duration of exposure, and penetrability of the exposed tissue. Tissue destruction proceeds under the toughened coagulated skin; ulcers extend deeply, heal slowly and leave a scar (Iverson et al, 1971; Dibbell et al, 1970; CHEMINFO , 1990; Edinburg & Swift, 1989; Asvesti et al, 1997).
    a) ONSET with CONCENTRATIONS LESS THAN 20% - Erythema and pain may be delayed up to 24 hours, often not reported until significant tissue damage has occurred (Matsuno, 1996; Bryant & Greenberg, 2001; Huisman et al, 2001). In one study, symptoms occurred within several hours following exposure to 7% HF, in less than one hour with 12% HF, and immediate symptoms with 14% HF (Velvart, 1983). In a case series (n=7), onset of symptoms ranged from 5 to 24 hours after dermal exposure to 5% hydrofluoric acid solution. When erosions and necrosis were present, time to re-epithelialization varied from 10 to 30 days (Asvesti et al, 1997). Onset of symptoms following dermal exposure to weak 3% hydrofluoric acid (found in metal cleaners) may occur several hours later. The presenting symptom is severe pain with intense throbbing, usually in the fingertips, and often occurs in the middle of the night following exposure the previous day (Hatzifotis et al, 2004).
    b) ONSET with CONCENTRATIONS 20% to 50% - Erythema and pain may be delayed for 8 hours, often not reported until tissue injury has occurred (Dibbell et al, 1970; Edinburg & Swift, 1989; Matsuno, 1996).
    c) ONSET with CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 50% - May produce immediate intense pain, erythema, accompanied by rapid destruction of tissues and life threatening sequelae (Dibbell et al, 1970; Matsuno, 1996; Bjornhagen et al, 2003; Dalamaga et al, 2008).
    b) INCIDENCE - RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: 219 patients exposed to dilute hydrofluoric acid (6% to 11%) reported symptoms of dermal swelling, redness, or both (55%), blistering (5%), blackish discoloration beneath the fingernail (5%), and pain without dermal changes (27%). Onset of symptoms reported occurred from 0.5 to 24 hours after exposure (El Saadi et al, 1989).
    c) Fatal systemic poisoning following the absorption of fluoride from a hydrogen fluoride burn involving 2.5% of body surface has been reported. A burn of less than 50 cm(2) maybe treated on an outpatient basis if vital areas are not involved. A burn involving a 50 to 100 cm(2) area requires hospitalized treatments. A burn that exceeds an area of 100 cm(2) should be treated in facilities with an intensive care unit (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    d) PERMANENT SEQUELAE: CASE SERIES: In a study of 14 patients with hydrofluoric acid burns of the hand, 2 patients developed permanent impairment that was associated with a delay in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. All patients were treated with immediate flushing with water for 15 minutes, calcium gluconate gel 2.5% massaged into burned skin for at least 30 minutes, and subcutaneous injections of 10% calcium gluconate into the affected area if pain persisted (Anderson & Anderson, 1988).
    e) Depending on the severity of the burn, signs and symptoms may include erythema, central blanching with peripheral erythema, swelling, vesiculation, serous crusting, ulceration, blue-gray discoloration, and necrosis (Hathaway et al, 1996a).
    f) In a study of 409 occupational exposures to hydrofluoric acid reported to 6 Texas Poison Centers during 2000 to 2010, burns (2nd-3rd degree) were observed in 35 (8.6%) patients. Superficial burns were observed in 70 (17.1%) patients. Route of exposures included dermal (69.4%), inhalation (21%), ocular (12%), and oral (3.7%). Overall, 51.6% of exposures were not serious. Calcium therapy was used in 234 cases (57.2%) (Forrester, 2012).
    g) CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man received third-degree burns to his face after being splashed in the face with a solution of hydrofluoric acid while cleaning pipes. He complained of chest pain and, 30 minutes after the accident, developed cardiopulmonary arrest. Despite aggressive resuscitative measures, the patient died 1.5 hours after the accident. Autopsy findings showed that the chemical burn on his face extended to both ears with the affected area a greenish-gray color. Both temporal bones were also dyed a greenish-gray color (Takase et al, 2004).
    h) CASE REPORT: Following accidental dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid, a 29-year-old man received chemical burns over approximately 15.5% of his total body surface area. He developed persistent nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, and severe hypocalcemia exhibiting as generalized tetany. He continued to deteriorate clinically, developing QT interval prolongation which progressed to cardiac arrest. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient died 1.5 hours postexposure (Wedler et al, 2005).
    i) CASE REPORT: After being splashed on the right thigh with 20% hydrofluoric acid, a 36-year-old man experienced a 3% total body surface area first-degree burn. He immediately washed and applied 2.5% calcium gluconate gel to the affected area. On presentation, all serum electrolytes were normal, and he had mild leukocytosis and mild metabolic acidosis. He later developed hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, bradycardia, and asystole 16 hours after exposure. Following resuscitation and treatment with IV 10% calcium chloride, 10% calcium glucose, 20% magnesium sulfate, and 15% potassium chloride, he was stabilized and returned to sinus bradycardia, which persisted from 9 to 49 hours postexposure. Overall, 112 mEq IV calcium, 97.2 mEq IV magnesium, and 142 mEq of IV and oral potassium were administered and he gradually recovered and was discharged after 4 days of hospitalization (Wu et al, 2010).
    C) INJECTION SITE REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) An intradermal injection of approximately 5 mL of a rust removal solution containing 7% HF resulted in a severe chemical burn with necrotic eschar formation and systemic effects of severe, resistant hypocalcemia, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and hypochloremia (Gallerani et al, 1998).
    1) The burn site was treated with cutaneous and subcutaneous injections of magnesium chloride, 10% solution of calcium gluconate, and 2% xylocaine, followed by topical calcium gluconate. Surgical intervention was required.

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISORDER OF BONE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) BONE DECALCIFICATION: The fluoride ion may cause decalcification and corrosion of bone beneath the area of dermal burn. Bone destruction is extremely painful (Dibbell et al, 1970; Matsuno, 1996).
    B) FLUOROSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CHRONIC FLUOROSIS, characterized by bone pain, osteosclerosis of long bones, and calcification of ligaments has been reported after chronic occupational exposure to HF fumes (Largent et al, 1951; Waldbott & Lee, 1978; White, 1980).
    C) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis, with elevated CPK levels, has been reported following dermal exposures (Sanz-Gallen et al, 2001; Sadove et al, 1990).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old man who fell into a tank containing 10% to 12% hydrofluoric acid and anhydrous ammonia developed elevated CPK levels (40,000 International Units/L) for the first few days after injury (Sadove et al, 1990). Values had returned to normal by 25 days after exposure.

Reproductive

    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In female rats, HF at airborne concentrations of 0.1 or 0.2 mg/m(3) increased preimplantation deaths and was embryotoxic and teratogenic at the higher dose, while no effects were observed at a concentration of 0.0025 mg/m3 (pp 160-164), suggesting a threshold for teratogenicity in this species.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) TOOTH DISCOLORATION
    1) High-level daily fluoride intake during pregnancy can rarely cause mottling of the deciduous teeth in the offspring. Skeletal abnormalities from prenatal exposure are thought to be unlikely, because they require many years of high-level exposure to develop in adults. Fluoride at lower doses (up to 2 mg per day) is thought to be essential for normal development.
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Fluoride was not readily transferred through the placenta to the fetus in rats, with less than 1% of the total maternal dose found in the offspring (Katz & Stookey, 1973). Fluoride ion was available to fetal guinea pigs (Rioufol, 1980). A rabbit which became pregnant during a subacute inhalation exposure to HF at an airborne concentration of 0.0152 mg/L/6 hours for 30 days gave birth to normal offspring (Machle & Kitzmiller, 1935).
    2) Fetal death was reported in one rat study, where a dose of 4980 mcg/m(3) were administered by inhalation route to females at 1 to 22 days of pregnancy (RTECS , 2000).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) FERTILITY DECREASED FEMALE
    a) Pre- and post-implantation mortality was reported in one rat study, where a dose of 470 mcg/m(3) were administered by inhalation route to females at 1 to 22 days of pregnancy (RTECS , 2000).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7664-39-3 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the possible carcinogenic activity of fluoride in humans.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no studies were found on the possible carcinogenic activity of fluoride in humans.
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) SARCOMA
    1) A National Toxicology Program study found a few osteosarcomas in rats chronically exposed to high levels of fluoride in the drinking water, but these findings have tentatively been classified as inconclusive.

Genotoxicity

    A) DNA damage and chromosome aberrations have been reported in insect studies.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Measure serial serum or ionized calcium levels frequently (every 30 minutes) following ingestions or with large dermal exposures.
    B) Perform serial ECGs and cardiac monitoring for moderate to severe exposures. Follow QTc prolongation as a marker for hypocalcemia and risk for dysrhythmias.
    C) Obtain serum electrolytes (including magnesium) and creatinine.
    D) Endoscopic evaluation for corrosive injury should be performed after ingestion, ideally within 12 hours.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Continuous repeated exposure to HF vapor greater than 3 ppm in air may cause excessive deposition of fluoride in the body, resulting in chronic fluorosis which is detectable by measuring blood fluoride levels.
    2) Measure serial serum or ionized calcium levels frequently (every 30 minutes) following ingestions or with large dermal exposures. Obtain serum electrolytes (including magnesium) and creatinine.
    3) Serum and urine fluoride levels may be used to confirm HF exposure.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Perform serial ECGs and cardiac monitoring for moderate to severe exposures. Follow QTc prolongation as a marker for hypocalcemia and risk for dysrhythmias.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All intentional ingestions and patients with significant exposures (i.e., dysrhythmias, hypotension, pulmonary complications or deep tissue destruction) should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Patients who require intra-arterial perfusion should be admitted with their arterial catheter in place in case repeat doses are needed.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Only for asymptomatic patients with mild dermal exposure controlled with analgesics or those who have no symptoms after the exposure.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with pain not responding to topical treatment, patients with significant inhalation exposure, or any patients ingesting HF.

Monitoring

    A) Measure serial serum or ionized calcium levels frequently (every 30 minutes) following ingestions or with large dermal exposures.
    B) Perform serial ECGs and cardiac monitoring for moderate to severe exposures. Follow QTc prolongation as a marker for hypocalcemia and risk for dysrhythmias.
    C) Obtain serum electrolytes (including magnesium) and creatinine.
    D) Endoscopic evaluation for corrosive injury should be performed after ingestion, ideally within 12 hours.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) DILUTION
    1) FLUORIDE BINDING - Attempt immediate administration of a fluoride binding substance. Options include milk (one-half to one glassful), chewable calcium carbonate tablets, or milk of magnesia. Avoid large amounts of liquid, since this may induce vomiting.
    B) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Do NOT induce vomiting.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) FLUORIDE BINDING - Attempt immediate administration of a fluoride binding substance which includes milk (1/2 to 1 glass-full), chewable calcium carbonate tablets, or milk of magnesia. Avoid large amounts of liquid, since this may induce vomiting.
    2) The precise amount of oral calcium required is unknown. One protocol for oral decontamination used 2400 mg of elemental calcium every two hours until hospital admission (Browne, 1982). This is equivalent to 12 TUMS(R) tablets (contain 200 mg each), 11 ROLAIDS CALCIUM RICH(R) tablets (contain 220 mg each), or 8 TUMS EXTRA STRENGTH(R) tablets (contain 300 mg each) per dose. Milk contains approximately 300 mg elemental calcium per 8 ounces.
    B) EMESIS/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Do NOT induce vomiting.
    C) NASOGASTRIC SUCTION
    1) Consider careful nasogastric suction or lavage with a small (18 Fr) soft tube for patients with significant ingestions who present within 60 minutes of exposure and have not spontaneously vomited. CALCIUM GLUCONATE 10% may be added to the lavage fluid.
    2) Brushite (calcium phosphate, dibasic, dihydrate) suspension is superior in inactivating hydrofluoric acid when compared to apatite (calcium orthophosphate, basic) suspension, calcium gluconate solution, or skim milk in an in vitro model of acute fluoride poisoning (Larsen & Jensen, 1991).
    a) Hydrofluoric acid containing test solutions were prepared by dissolving sodium fluoride in hydrochloric acid to produce three solutions, each with a pH of 4.5 (solution I), 4.0 (solution II), or 2.1 (solution III).
    b) The solutions provide a source of calcium that reacts with hydrofluoric acid producing calcium fluoride.
    c) The table below illustrates the percentage of fluoride removed by calcium fluoride formation in vitro.
    SOLUTION
    CALCIUM SOURCE I II III
    pH%FpH%FpH%F
    Brushite 0.16 g/mL7.2887.0992.490
    Brushite 0.16 g/mL7.2756.5642.156
    Apatite 0.58 g/mL7.4347.0383.4100
    Apatite 0.058 g/mL7.4306.6252.184
    Calcium gluconate0.24 g/mL4.8873.6602.29
    Skim Milk 0.1 g/mL7.1466.9334.58.3

    d) Additional in vitro studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these agents for gastric lavage in human fluoride poisoning.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT
    1) FLUORIDE BINDING - Attempt immediate administration of a fluoride binding substance which includes milk (1/2 to 1 glass-full), chewable calcium carbonate tablets, or milk of magnesia. Avoid large amounts of liquid, since this may induce vomiting.
    2) The precise amount of oral calcium required is unknown. One protocol for oral decontamination used 2400 mg of elemental calcium every two hours until hospital admission (Browne, 1982). This is equivalent to 12 TUMS(R) tablets (contain 200 mg each), 11 ROLAIDS CALCIUM RICH(R) tablets (contain 220 mg each), or 8 TUMS EXTRA STRENGTH(R) tablets (contain 300 mg each) per dose. Milk contains approximately 300 mg elemental calcium per 8 ounces.
    3) ANIMAL STUDY - In mice gavaged with a lethal dose of NaF, high doses (> than a 1:1 molar ratio to fluoride) of oral calcium chloride or magnesium sulfate improved survival(Kao et al, 2004).
    B) HYPOCALCEMIA
    1) Hypocalcemia in the absence of clinical tetany may occur following oral ingestion or dermal exposure (Tepperman, 1980). Check patient for a positive Trousseau's or Chvostek's sign.
    2) CALCIUM CHLORIDE
    a) ADULT DOSE: 1 g (10 mL of 10% solution) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes (Jones & Flanagan, 2004; Saxena, 1989; Anon, 2000).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 10 to 25 mg/kg (0.1 to 0.25 mL/kg) per dose up to a maximum single dose of 5 mL (500 mg) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes (Jones & Flanagan, 2004; Barkin, 1986; Anon, 2000).
    c) CALCIUM FOR INJECTION is available as three salts; calcium chloride, calcium gluconate, and calcium gluceptate.
    d) While the other salts may be used, calcium chloride is the preferred salt for resuscitation since it directly delivers ionized calcium, whereas the other salts must be hepatically metabolized to release ionized calcium (Chameides, 1988). However, other studies have suggested that hepatic metabolism may not be required for calcium gluconate (Martin et al, 1990).
    e) Calcium chloride is very irritating, and is ideally given via a central venous catheter. It may cause hypotension and bradycardia. Calcium salts are incompatible with bicarbonate (Chameides, 1988; Saxena, 1989; Anon, 2000).
    f) Doses of up to 113 mEq of calcium have been used to successfully to treat hydrofluoric acid burns. A dose of 266.7 mEq used in one case resulted in hypercalcemia (Greco et al, 1988).
    3) Monitor ECG continuously and at least hourly serial total or ionized calcium, magnesium, potassium levels during therapy. Suspect hypocalcemia and/or hypomagnesemia when QTc interval is prolonged.
    4) Treat aggressively with intravenous calcium in the presence of any ECG or clinical signs of hypocalcemia while serum calcium levels are pending.
    C) HYPOMAGNESEMIA
    1) Hypomagnesemia may develop following oral ingestion or dermal exposure and has been associated with QTc prolongation and ventricular dysrhythmias.
    2) Correct known and suspected hypomagnesemia with intravenous magnesium sulfate.
    3) MAGNESIUM SULFATE DOSE
    a) ADULT: 1 to 2 g diluted in 250 mL D5W or NS and infused IV, may be repeated as necessary.
    b) PEDIATRIC: 25 to 50 mg/kg IV infusion over 30 to 60 minutes; repeat dose as necessary; max 2 g/dose (Kleinman et al, 2010; Manrique et al, 2010; Haque & Saleem, 2009)
    4) Serial evaluation of the patient's knee jerk reflex is the most important and reliable guide to magnesium treatment. Serum magnesium levels are not a reliable indicator for what is a "therapeutic level". Patient should be monitored with ECG continuously.
    D) HYPERKALEMIA
    1) Patients should be monitored for laboratory and/or ECG evidence of hyperkalemia after ingestion of HF.
    a) ECG changes include peaked T waves in the precordial leads, prolongation of the PR interval and QRS duration, progressive flattening of the P wave, merging of the QRS complex with the T wave to produce a continuous sine wave appearance, and ventricular fibrillation or asystole (Martin et al, 1986; Smith et al, 1985).
    b) ECG manifestations of hyperkalemia and/or a serum potassium concentration of 7.5 mEq/L or greater indicates a medical emergency and requires aggressive therapy and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    c) Fluoride-induced hyperkalemia, once developed, may be irreversible. Therapeutic intervention to prevent development of elevated serum potassium is essential. Note: the beta-adrenergic receptor and the calcium channel do NOT appear to have major roles in fluoride-induced hyperkalemia. Early aggressive therapy with glucose, insulin and/or sodium bicarbonate prior to the development of hyperkalemia was ineffective in dog studies; however, quinidine was shown effective in preventing the K+ efflux from cells and preventing cardiotoxicity in fluoride-toxic dogs. Therapeutic doses of other antidysrhythmics, such as lidocaine, were not effective. Propranolol worsened fluoride-induced cardiotoxicity (Cummings & McIvor, 1988; McIvor & Cummings, 1987).
    d) In an in-vitro model of human erythrocytes, the potassium channel blockers, amiodarone and quinidine, attenuated fluoride-induced hyperkalemia. The authors recommended further in-vivo studies to determine whether amiodarone can enhance survival in fluoride poisoning (Su et al, 2003).
    e) Death is usually the result of delayed sudden cardiovascular collapse with ventricular fibrillation associated with electrolyte imbalances (hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperkalemia). If sudden death is avoided in the first 24 hours, prognosis is good, although recovery may be prolonged. In dog studies, increase in serum potassium levels began at approximately 2 hours postexposure and began to rise exponentially at 6 hours postexposure. Maintain normal or alkalotic pH. Cation exchange resins or dialysis may be the only effective means in which to reverse fluoride-induced hyperkalemia (Cummings & McIvor, 1988; McIvor & Cummings, 1987; McIvor et al, 1987).
    2) CALCIUM CHLORIDE
    a) Intravenous calcium has no effect on circulating potassium levels, but it antagonizes cardiac toxicity in patients demonstrating cardiac signs and/or symptoms of hyperkalemia.
    b) ADULT DOSE: 1 g (10 mL of 10% solution) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes (Jones & Flanagan, 2004; Saxena, 1989; Anon, 2000).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 10 to 25 mg/kg (0.1 to 0.25 mL/kg) per dose up to a maximum single dose of 5 mL (500 mg) IV infused over 5 minutes; may repeat after 10 minutes (Jones & Flanagan, 2004; Barkin, 1986; Anon, 2000).
    d) CALCIUM FOR INJECTION is available as three salts; calcium chloride, calcium gluconate, and calcium gluceptate.
    e) While the other salts may be used, calcium chloride is the preferred salt for resuscitation since it directly delivers ionized calcium, whereas the other salts must be hepatically metabolized to release ionized calcium (Chameides, 1988). However, other studies have suggested that hepatic metabolism may not be required for calcium gluconate (Martin et al, 1990).
    f) Calcium chloride is very irritating, and is ideally given via a central venous catheter. It may cause hypotension and bradycardia. Calcium salts are incompatible with bicarbonate (Chameides, 1988; Saxena, 1989; Anon, 2000).
    3) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) Administer intravenous sodium bicarbonate to shift potassium intracellularly. Expect 0.5 to 1 mEq/L reduction in serum potassium for each 0.1 unit rise in blood pH.
    b) A standard syringe contains 50 mL of 8.4% solution, 1 mEq/mL, 50 mEq/syringe.
    c) ADULT DOSE - 50 mL (50 mEq) intravenously over 5 minutes, repeated at 20 to 30 minute intervals.
    d) PEDIATRIC DOSE - 1 to 2 mL/kg/dose (1 to 2 mEq/kg/dose) intravenously every 2 to 4 hours or as required by pH (Barkin, 1986). The onset is 15 minutes, the duration of action 1 to 2 hours (Ellenhorn, 1997).
    4) INSULIN/DEXTROSE
    a) Enhances intracellular potassium shift.
    b) ADULT DOSE - Administer 25 grams of dextrose (250 mL of a 10% solution) intravenously over 30 minutes, and then continue the infusion at a slower rate.
    c) Ten units of regular insulin are given subcutaneously or added to the infusion.
    d) ALTERNATIVELY, 50 mL of a 50% dextrose solution with 5 to 10 units of regular insulin may be administered intravenously over 5 minutes.
    e) Typically, this regimen will lower serum potassium by 1 to 2 mEq/L within 30 to 60 minutes with the decrease lasting for several hours.
    f) PEDIATRIC DOSE - 0.5 to 1 gram/kg/dose followed by 1 unit of regular insulin intravenously for every 4 grams of glucose infused; may repeat every 10 to 30 minutes (Barkin, 1986).
    g) HYPEROSMOLARITY - It must be remembered that 50% dextrose, and even 25% dextrose, are very hyperosmolar and may be sclerosing to peripheral veins (Chameides, 1988); administration of hypertonic solutions via central lines is preferred, if possible.
    E) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) Evaluate for and treat hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia and hyperkalemia. Because amiodarone has potassium channel blocking effects, it may be the preferred antidysrhythmic in the setting of hydrofluoric acid poisoning.
    2) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    F) BURN
    1) Patient should be observed and evaluated for evidence of oral and gastrointestinal burns after deliberate ingestions or ingestion of high concentration products. While gastrointestinal burns may occur after ingestion they are generally NOT an immediate life threat.
    G) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE
    1) Endoscopy is recommended after ingestion of high concentration (greater than 20%) products, deliberate ingestion of large amounts of low or high concentration products, or in patients manifesting drooling, stridor, abdominal pain, or repeated vomiting. There is little published information regarding the use of endoscopy and the therapy of mucosal burns after ingestion of hydrofluoric acid.
    H) ACIDOSIS
    1) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS: Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with sodium bicarbonate, 1 to 2 mEq/kg is a reasonable starting dose(Kraut & Madias, 2010). Monitor serum electrolytes and arterial or venous blood gases to guide further therapy.

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) OXYGEN
    1) Administer 100% humidified oxygen to patients with abnormal respiratory signs or symptoms.
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    C) CALCIUM
    1) Administration of nebulized CALCIUM GLUCONATE 2.5% has been recommended (Trevino et al, 2001; Trevino et al, 1983; Tsonis et al, 2008).
    2) CASE SERIES: The use of calcium gluconate nebulization was reported in 13 workers exposed to 150 to 200 ppm HF gas for 2 minutes. Patients were treated quickly after exposure, and only minor upper respiratory tract irritation was noted. All patients tolerated the treatment without adverse effects. None developed delayed pulmonary edema or any permanent sequelae (Lee et al, 1993).
    3) CASE REPORT: Following a one minute exposure to fumes from an anhydrous HF spill in an enclosed area, a male worker experienced immediate upper airway irritation and dyspnea. Three nebulized calcium gluconate treatments were immediately administered with resolution of respiratory complaints. The authors suggested this treatment may have prevented pulmonary injury (Boyer et al, 2000).
    4) CASE SERIES: Five workers presented to the emergency department 4 hours after inhalation exposure to HF fumes. Burning of the mouth and tongue were reported in 3 of the patients and one complained of nausea and abdominal cramps. All patients were administered a 2.5% calcium gluconate nebulized treatment. All symptoms resolved by the end of the treatment. The authors recommend calcium gluconate nebulization therapy for mild symptoms of HF inhalation (Trevino et al, 2001).
    5) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man with severe dyspnea from HF exposure was given 5% calcium gluconate solution via a nebulizer, and completely recovered by day 21 (Kono et al, 2000).
    6) CASE REPORT: Following inhalation of fumes from a glass etching cream for approximately one hour, a 41-year-old man presented to the emergency department with throat irritation, burning chest pain, and dyspnea. The glass etching cream, that the patient was using to remove scratches from his glasses, was found to contain 28% to 39% ammonium bifluoride and sodium bifluoride. At presentation his vital signs were normal, oxygen saturation was 100%, laboratory data (ie, CBC, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function) were within normal limits, there were no ECG abnormalities (QRS 84, QTc 440), and a chest x-ray indicated clear lungs. Physical exam revealed pharyngeal erythema. Treatment was initiated with 2.5% nebulized calcium gluconate resulting in immediate improvement in symptoms; however, continued recurrence of pain and dyspnea necessitated a total of 4 rounds of therapy over a 12-hour period. During therapy, the patient's QTc interval peaked at 458; however, he became asymptomatic, with normal ECG intervals, and was discharged (Kessler et al, 2015).
    D) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Irrigate promptly with crystalloid solution (lactated ringer's or normal saline). Carefully evaluate for eye damage; exposure to dilute solutions may result in delayed signs and symptoms of ocular damage (Caravati, 1988). The patient should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist following appropriate decontamination.
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) IRRIGATION
    1) SUMMARY - Similar to treatment of skin exposure, calcium gluconate solution and benzethonium chloride (benzethonium hydrochloride) have been suggested for treatment of eye exposure. In addition, single irrigation with isotonic sodium chloride or magnesium chloride has been suggested (with repeated irrigation an increase in the frequency of corneal ulceration was reported in rabbit eyes) (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    2) Based on animal studies, immediate SINGLE 30 minutes irrigation with one liter of water, isotonic sodium chloride or magnesium chloride may provide the most beneficial therapy for ocular exposure to 0.25 M/L or greater of HF. However, multiple irrigations increased the corneal ulceration rate from 6 to 40% (McCulley et al, 1983). Other animal studies suggest that irrigation with 1% calcium gluconate solution did not have any significant advantage over saline irrigation and topical treatment only following ocular exposure to 2% HF (Beiran et al, 1986).
    3) Monitor eye fluid pH with litmus paper and continue irrigation until ocular pH is in the normal range. The patient should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist following appropriate decontamination (Grant, 1986).
    4) Equivocal results have been reported after immediate copious washing of the eyes, followed by application of ice packs until arrival at a health care facility, then irrigation with 1% calcium gluconate for 5 to 10 minutes, and instillation of 1% calcium gluconate drops every 2 to 3 hours for 2 to 3 days (Trevino et al, 1983a).
    5) Bentur et al (1993) report the case of 33-year-old man who splashed 49% HF into his eye. Treatment consisted of immediate flushing with water by the patient followed by further flushing with water for 10 minutes at the worksite and with 1 L of normal saline 50 minutes later in the emergency department.
    a) Examination at that time revealed chemotic and hyperemic conjunctiva and sloughing of nearly all of the corneal epithelium. The patient was treated with 1% calcium gluconate drops (3 drops every 3 hours for 2 days), topical cycloplegia and antibiotics and a mild pressure patch. The epithelial defect healed over the next 4 days and eye exam was normal at 3 months.
    B) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) IONTOPHORETIC CALCIUM
    a) ANIMAL STUDY - Following experimental 50% HF burns to the nude backs of rats, one group of rats was treated with iontophoresis of calcium chloride with constant voltage at 1.5V and electric current at 20-30 microamps at first, then increased to 100-120 microamps within 5 minutes; total treatment, 30 minutes. Burn areas of this group were reduced significantly when compared to untreated rats, those treated with calcium gluconate jelly, and rats treated with intradermal and subcutaneous calcium gluconate injections. Transdermal transport of calcium appeared to be enhanced in stripped skins by iontophoresis. No adverse effects were observed in normal skins. Limitations of iontophoretic treatment include number of lesions that can be treated simultaneously and size of the lesion (patches are small and unable to cover large areas). Use of iontophoretic delivery of calcium in humans is currently not recommended (Yamashita et al, 2001).
    2) EYE TREATMENT
    a) ANIMAL STUDIES - Various eye treatments were tried on animals to determine the most effective method to bind the fluoride ion.
    1) Subconjunctival injection of calcium gluconate is too toxic to the eye.
    2) Injections of isotonic CaCl2, or mixtures of the most common divalent cations of the cornea cause further injury.
    3) Topical ointments of magnesium or magnesium sulfate, irrigation with 0.2% hyamine (0.2% benzenethonium chloride) or 0.05% Zephiran and isotonic CaCl2 were all toxic to the eye.
    b) ANIMAL STUDIES - Following a 20 second exposure of 2.5% HF to rabbit corneas, different rinsing solutions were evaluated (tap water, 1% calcium gluconate, and Hexafluorine(R)). Rinsing commenced 25 seconds after burning and continued for 15 minutes. High resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure changes in corneal thickness and HF penetration. Both tap water and 1% calcium gluconate rinses showed initial reduction in HF penetration, but full corneal penetration was seen once the rinses ended. The Hexafluorine(R) rinse showed no increased HF penetration within 1 hour after rinsing, suggesting superior efficacy to the other rinses (Spoler et al, 2008).
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) Remove all exposed clothing and jewelry taking necessary precautions to prevent secondary exposure to health care providers (ie, wear protective clothing, gloves, etc). Irrigate all exposed areas promptly with copious amounts of water or crystalloid solution (lactated ringer's or normal saline) for at least 30 minutes. Carefully evaluate for eye damage; exposure to dilute solutions may result in delayed signs and symptoms of ocular damage. The patient should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist following appropriate decontamination.
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SKIN FINDING
    1) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    a) Exposure to dilute solutions (6% to 11%) hydrofluoric acid is best treated by immediately washing all exposed areas with copious amounts of water or crystalloid solution (lactated ringer's or normal saline) for at least 30 minutes while removing all potentially contaminated clothing and jewelry. Take necessary precautions to prevent secondary exposure to health care providers. Carefully evaluate for ocular damage when dermal exposure involves the face.
    b) Exposure to dilute HF solutions may result in delayed signs and symptoms of ocular damage. If ocular exposure has occurred, the patient should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist after appropriate decontamination. Calcium gluconate or calcium carbonate gel applied topically to the affected area has been associated with relief of pain at the site of exposure. Systemic toxicity or severe tissue damage is unlikely to occur with small surface area exposures to dilute solutions. Aggressive therapy with calcium gluconate infiltration or calcium gluconate arterial perfusion are not likely to be necessary and may increase tissue damage.
    2) DERMAL ABSORPTION
    a) Dermal exposure to HF can produce hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperkalemia, cardiac dysrhythmias, and death (Tepperman, 1980; Yamaura et al, 1997).
    B) HYPERKALEMIA
    1) Fluoride-induced hyperkalemia, once developed, may be irreversible. Therapeutic intervention to prevent development of elevated serum potassium is essential. Note: the beta-adrenergic receptor and the calcium channel do NOT appear to have major roles in fluoride-induced hyperkalemia. Early aggressive therapy with glucose, insulin and/or sodium bicarbonate prior to the development of hyperkalemia was ineffective in dog studies; however, quinidine was shown effective in preventing the K+ efflux from cells and preventing cardiotoxicity in fluoride-toxic dogs. Therapeutic doses of other antidysrhythmics, such as lidocaine, were not effective. Propranolol worsened fluoride-induced cardiotoxicity (Cummings & McIvor, 1988; McIvor & Cummings, 1987).
    2) Death is usually the result of delayed sudden cardiovascular collapse with ventricular fibrillation triggered by electrolyte abnormalities (hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperkalemia). If sudden death is avoided in the first 24 hours, prognosis is good, although recovery may be prolonged. In dog studies, increase in serum potassium levels began at approximately 2 hours postexposure and began to rise exponentially at 6 hours postexposure. Maintain normal or alkalotic pH. Cation exchange resins or dialysis may be the only effective means in which to reverse fluoride-induced hyperkalemia (Cummings & McIvor, 1988; McIvor & Cummings, 1987; McIvor, 1987).
    C) HYPOCALCEMIA
    1) Hypocalcemia in the absence of clinical tetany may occur following dermal exposure (Tepperman, 1980). Check patient for a positive Trousseau's or Chvostek's sign.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Thoroughly irrigate skin immediately after exposure. Patients with early decontamination do well. Patients with pain should be treated with topical calcium therapy. TOPICAL - Treat with calcium gluconate or carbonate gel (1 g calcium gluconate in 40 g (about 40 mL) water-soluble lubricant = 2.5% gel; alternative is 10 10-g tablets crushed to fine powder + 20 mL water-soluble lubricant mixed into a slurry; apply thin coat to burn, then place hand in glove containing 10 mL slurry for 4 hours). SUBCUTANEOUS - Inject 0.5 mL/cm(2) with 10% calcium gluconate for topical treatment failures (not commonly used).
    b) Do not use calcium chloride for bier block procedures. Calcium chloride is irritating to the tissues and may cause injury.
    3) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Patients with pain not responding to topical calcium can be treated with regional venous or arterial perfusion. These methods are particularly effective for HF exposures involving the digits. BIER BLOCK - Inject IV 10 to 40 mL calcium gluconate in 50 mL normal saline for 20 minutes. ARTERIAL - 10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium gluconate in 50 mL D5W. Infuse over 4 hours via radial or brachial artery. The arterial catheter may be placed in normal position (not inverted).
    b) Do not use calcium chloride for bier block procedures. Calcium chloride is irritating to the tissues and may cause injury.
    c) Doses of up to 113 mEq of calcium have been used to successfully treat hydrofluoric acid burns. A dose of 266.7 mEq used in one case resulted in hypercalcemia (Greco et al, 1988).
    4) Monitor ECG continuously and at least hourly serial total or ionized calcium, magnesium, potassium levels during therapy. Suspect hypocalcemia and/or hypomagnesemia when QTc interval is prolonged.
    5) Treat aggressively with intravenous calcium in the presence of any ECG or clinical signs of hypocalcemia while serum calcium levels are pending.
    D) HYPOMAGNESEMIA
    1) Hypomagnesemia may develop after dermal exposure or ingestion and has been associated with QTc prolongation, ventricular dysrhythmias and death.
    2) Correct known and suspected hypomagnesemia with intravenous magnesium sulfate.
    3) MAGNESIUM SULFATE DOSE
    a) ADULT: 1 to 2 g diluted in 250 mL D5W or NS and infused IV, may be repeated as necessary.
    b) PEDIATRIC: 25 to 50 mg/kg IV infusion over 30 to 60 minutes; repeat dose as necessary; max 2 g/dose (Kleinman et al, 2010; Manrique et al, 2010; Haque & Saleem, 2009)
    4) Serial evaluation of the patient's knee jerk reflex is the most important and reliable guide to magnesium treatment. Serum magnesium levels are not a reliable indicator for what is a "therapeutic level". Patient should be monitored with ECG continuously.
    E) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) Evaluate for and treat hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia and hyperkalemia. High dose calcium should be administered empirically to patients exposed to HF who have ventricular dysrhythmias. Because amiodarone has potassium channel blocking effects, it may be the preferred antidysrhythmic in the setting of hydrofluoric acid poisoning.
    2) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    F) DRUG THERAPY
    1) CALCIUM GEL
    a) SUMMARY
    1) Various topical calcium preparations have been used anecdotally for treatment of exposure to HF solutions of less than 20%. Concentrations of calcium gluconate or calcium carbonate range from 2.5% to 33%. There are no studies comparing relative efficacy among different concentrations of gel.
    2) The less viscous gel form may be more practical for application to large surface areas, while the concentrated slurry may be more appropriate for smaller areas such as hands or fingers. Topical application of a 2.5% calcium gluconate gel is easier to perform and less painful than infiltration (Brown, 1974; Asvesti et al, 1997; El Saadi et al, 1989; Trevino et al, 1983).
    3) Murao (1989) demonstrated in rats dermally exposed to 20% hydrofluoric acid, that irrigation of the affected skin with running water for 10 minutes followed by application of 2.5% calcium gluconate jelly was an effective therapy for reducing fluoride concentrations in urine and tissues surrounding the injured region (Murao, 1989).
    4) TECHNIQUE
    a) After copious irrigation with water, the gel is typically massaged into the affected area until the pain has subsided for 15 minutes. It must have access to the burn, so cloth or thick necrotic coagulum should be removed. The earlier the initiation of this therapy after exposure, the more rapid the resolution of symptoms may occur (El Saadi et al, 1989).
    b) For hand and/or finger burns, a thin layer of 32.5% calcium carbonate slurry was applied directly to the burned area, and 10 mL were placed in a surgical glove into which the affected hand was placed. Patients moved or massaged the hand periodically and the glove was changed at 4 hours and again at 8 hours if pain persisted (Chick & Borah, 1990).
    5) COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AVAILABLE
    a) A commercial gel, "H-F Antidote Gel" is available from Moore & Company, Ltd. Rippleside Commercial Estate, Renwick Rd, Barking, Essex, IG11 05D, England. Also, a 2.5% by weight calcium gluconate gel and jelly are available OTC in 25 gram tubes from Pharmascience Inc., Montreal, Quebec (514-340-1114), sold under the name "H-F Antidote Gel".
    b) EXTEMPORANEOUS PREPARATION
    1) CALCIUM GLUCONATE POWDER (METHOD 1) - Add 3.5 grams of calcium gluconate USP to a 5 ounce tube of water-soluble surgical lubricant, such as K-Y Jelly(R). Other soluble calcium salts (such as calcium lactate) may theoretically be substituted for the gluconate salt, but no data exist on use of these salts. Calcium chloride is NOT recommended due to its potential for irritation. IF CALCIUM GLUCONATE POWDER IS NOT AVAILABLE, PREPARE GEL FROM CALCIUM CARBONATE TABLETS AS DIRECTED UNDER METHOD 3.
    2) CALCIUM GLUCONATE POWDER (METHOD 2) - Dissolve 2.5 grams calcium gluconate in 91.25 mL of water, heating the water if necessary. Let cool to room temperature. Add 0.25 gram chlorhexidine gluconate and stir. Make a slurry in a separate container of hydroxyethyl cellulose 2 grams and isopropyl alcohol 4 mL, and stir. Add slurry to calcium solution, stirring vigorously until a thick gel has formed. Leave overnight before packing (EAPCC, 1987).
    3) CALCIUM CARBONATE TABLETS (METHOD 3) - A 32.5% slurry used for treatment of hand or finger burns can be prepared by triturating ten (10 gram) tablets into a fine powder and adding to 20 mL of a water-soluble lubricant gel, such as K-Y Jelly(R) (Chick & Borah, 1990). Another method is to gradually add the calcium carbonate powder to K-Y Jelly(R) until a spreadable gel is produced.
    4) CALCIUM GLUCONATE SOLUTION (METHOD 4) - A gel consisting of equal parts of dimethyl sulfoxide and a 10% calcium gluconate solution for injection was shown to enhance percutaneous calcium ion absorption in rat skin (Zachary et al, 1986). Cornstarch, methyl cellulose, or other inert thickeners, may be added in order to produce a spreadable gel.
    5) Higher concentrations of calcium gluconate solutions (up to 33%) may be used for more serious burns.
    c) EFFICACY
    1) CASE SERIES - A calcium carbonate 32.5% slurry was effective in relieving pain within 4 to 6 hours in 8 of 9 patients with hydrofluoric acid hand or finger burns. It was unsuccessful in one patient who did not present until 24 hours after exposure (Chick & Borah, 1990).
    2) ANIMAL STUDY - In a rat model, animals treated with calcium gluconate gel developed a less serious burn than animals treated with benzalkonium chloride, A & D ointment, aloe gel, or magnesium ointment (Bracken et al, 1985).
    3) ANIMAL STUDY - In a rabbit model, calcium gluconate gel was the most effective in preventing severe skin damage. Aluminum and magnesium hydroxide tablets, crushed and mixed with a water-soluble lubricant gel, was also somewhat effective. Magnesium gluconate was no better than control vehicle (Burkhart et al, 1992; Burkhart et al, 1994).
    4) CALCIUM CHLORIDE IS NOT RECOMMENDED BASED ON ITS POTENTIAL FOR IRRITATION.
    2) HEXAFLUORINE(R)
    a) Hexafluorine(R), an amphoteric, hypertonic, polyvalent compound, was developed in France for decontamination of hydrofluoric acid (HF) eye and skin exposures. In a series of eye and skin occupational exposures with either 40% HF or a mixture of 6% HF and 15% nitric acid, Hexafluorine(R) was used as emergent decontamination within 2 minutes following exposure. None of the workers who were exposed experienced any chemical burns or sequelae. There was no need for any other treatment besides the Hexafluorine(R) decontamination and none of the workers lost work time (Mathieu et al, 2001).
    b) In another series of occupational exposures, involving 16 workers who experienced ocular and dermal splashes with either 70% HF or a mixture of 6% HF and 15% nitric acid, Hexafluorine(R) decontamination occurred within 1 minute of exposure in 12 of the workers. Three workers who were exposed to the 6% HF/15% nitric acid mixture received decontamination 1 hour postexposure. Immediate pain relief was reported either during or after Hexafluorine(R) decontamination in all HF-exposed workers. No severe burns or permanent sequelae were reported in any of the workers and 12 of the 16 workers did not require any further treatment following the initial decontamination with Hexafluorine(R). The mean lost work time was less than 1 day (Soderberg et al, 2004).
    c) In a rat study, a 50% HF solution was applied to the shaved backs of rats via a soaked filter paper for a 3 minute period. Thirty seconds after removal of the filter paper, the animals were either rinsed with 500 mL Hexafluorine(R) over a 3 minute period, or rinsed with water followed by calcium gluconate 2.5% gel, or rinsed with water only, or given no treatment. A consistent trend toward poorer results with Hexafluorine(R) was observed (Hulten et al, 2004; Hojer et al, 2002). Hall et al (2003) have disagreed with the findings of this study, stating that a 3 minute 50% HF contact time followed by a 30 second delay until decontamination is unrealistic in actual workplace exposures and would negate the effectiveness of any decontamination method (Hall et al, 2003).
    3) INTRAVENOUS CALCIUM/MAGNESIUM PERFUSION
    a) Regional intravenous infusion of calcium gluconate, using a technique similar to the Bier block, is a therapeutic option if HF burns of forearm, hand, or digits as adjunct to topical therapy or if topical therapy is unsatisfactory (Ryan et al, 1997; Henry & Hla, 1992) (Graundins et al, 1997; Isbister, 2000).
    b) An intravenous cannula is inserted into a vein in the dorsum of the affected hand. The superficial veins of the extremity are exsanguinated by raising the arm for about 5 minutes. This can also be accomplished by application of an Esmarch bandage. When exsanguination is complete the sphygmomanometer cuff is inflated to just above the systolic blood pressure to prevent the arm refilling with blood. The arm is then lowered or the Esmarch bandage removed. Ten to 20 mL of 10% calcium gluconate solution diluted to 30 to 40 mL with 0.9% saline solution is infused. Ischemia is maintained for 25 to 30 minutes; the blood pressure cuff is then sequentially released over 5 minutes.
    c) Intravenous therapy is considered successful if there is absence of pain and tenderness during the hour following treatment. Intraarterial calcium infusion should be considered in cases in which pain or tenderness persists at exposure sites.
    d) ANIMAL STUDY: Williams et al (1994) compared intravenous magnesium sulfate treatment with intradermal calcium gluconate treatment in HF-burned rats (Williams et al, 1994).
    e) Rats treated with magnesium sulfate (80 mg/kg) experienced fewer severe burns (1 of 11 surviving rats; 1 died) than controls (4 of 8 surviving rats; 5 died) or those treated with intradermal calcium (7 of 9 surviving rats; 1 died).
    f) Intravenous magnesium sulfate (0.2 mEq bolus over 2 minutes, followed by 0.2 mEq/kg/hr for 4 hours) diminished burn scars and lessening healing time in rabbits with HF burns (Cox & Osgood, 1994). Calcium gluconate infiltration (0.5 mL of 10% solution) was as effective in diminishing burn scars and healing time in this model.
    4) ARTERIAL CALCIUM PERFUSION
    a) Intraarterial calcium infusion for digital HF burn is also a therapeutic option and should be considered if regional intravenous calcium gluconate is ineffective. This method should be used on severe distal extremity burns by those physicians who are comfortable with the technique and have experience in the treatment of HF burns (Isbister, 2000).
    b) Several studies have evaluated arterial perfusion of 10 to 20% calcium salt (CALCIUM GLUCONATE or CALCIUM CHLORIDE) solutions to treat distal upper extremity HF burns (Kohnlein & Achinger, 1982; Velvart, 1983; Vance & Curry, 1986; Siegel & Heard, 1992). Intra-arterial infusion should be continued until pain does not recur (Tournoud et al, 1999). In general, pain relief was obtained and wound healing required 2 to 4 weeks.
    c) A long catheter is inserted percutaneously into the radial artery using standard aseptic technique. Intra-arterial catheter placement is confirmed by pressure transducer and oscilloscope. If the burn involves only the thumb, index, or long fingers, the catheter is advanced only a few centimeters proximally in preparation for digital subtraction arteriography. If the burn involves the ring or small fingers, the catheter is advanced proximally into the brachial artery because access to the ulnar circulation is necessary.
    d) Following satisfactory placement of the arterial line, digital subtraction arteriography is performed to identify the origin of vascular supply to digits involved. Once the tip of the catheter is in the desired location, a dilute preparation of calcium salts (10 mL of a 10% solution mixed in 40 to 50 mL 5% dextrose) is infused with a pump apparatus into the catheter over 4 hours. Generally, calcium gluconate is used, although calcium chloride may be used in a similar manner. The patient should be observed closely during the infusion period for progression of symptoms and potential complications of the procedure, such as alterations of distal vascular supply.
    e) Following the 4 hour infusion, the arterial line is maintained in place in the usual manner while the patient undergoes an observation period. If typical HF pain returns within 4 hours, a second calcium infusion is repeated. This cycle is repeated until the patient is pain free 4 hours following completion of the calcium infusion.
    f) EFFICACY - The efficacy of this method is difficult to determine since adequate controls were absent in all reports. This technique avoids the painful injections and nail removal required with infiltration therapy. It is able to deliver more calcium ions to the injured tissue. It has not been proven to give superior results to the infiltration technique, however, and requires an invasive vascular procedure, an infusion pump, and hospital admission.
    g) Complications associated with intra-arterial calcium infusion, include transient ulnar nerve palsy (believed due to the armboard used for infusion), and median nerve palsy from to hematomas from multiple arterial punctures (Siegel & Heard, 1992).
    h) Continued tissue destruction and associated pain (due to penetration of free fluoride ion into affected tissue) may be minimized by subcutaneous administration of CALCIUM GLUCONATE to form an insoluble (inactive) fluoride salt (Blunt, 1964). This procedure is NOT recommended for digital areas (fingers or toes) unless the physician is experienced with the technique, due to potential for tissue injury from increased pressure.
    i) CALCIUM CHLORIDE should NOT be used for intra-arterial infusions or local injection because it is irritating and may cause tissue injury.
    j) INDICATIONS - Local infiltration with CALCIUM GLUCONATE may be considered if (1) HF exposure results in immediate tissue damage or (2) erythema and pain persist following adequate irrigation (NOTE: Pain and erythema may be delayed up to 24 hours post exposure depending on the concentration of HF).
    k) Infiltrate each square centimeter of the affected (painful) dermis and subcutaneous tissue with about 0.5 mL of 10% CALCIUM GLUCONATE using a 30 gauge needle. Repeat as needed to control pain (Matsuno, 1996).
    l) CAUTION - Avoid administering large volumes of subcutaneous CALCIUM GLUCONATE, as this will result in decreased tissue perfusion and potential necrosis. Exposure of subungual tissue to concentrated hydrofluoric acid often necessitates removal of the nail in order to adequately decontaminate the nailbed and relieve pain (Mayer & Guelich, 1963; Wetherhold & Shepherd, 1965; Dibbell et al, 1970). In general, regional infusion is preferred to local injection in the hand or foot.
    5) MAGNESIUM
    a) Harris et al (1981) evaluated the efficacy of subcutaneous and intradermal injections of magnesium salts (10% acetate and sulfate) in rats dermally exposed to HF. In this study, the magnesium salts effectively minimized the depth and progression of the HF burn but further studies are needed before these salts can be routinely recommended (Harris et al, 1981).
    b) Burkhart et al (1992) found that magnesium gluconate in water soluble lubricant gel (K-Y Jelly(R)) was less effective than calcium gluconate in preventing deep layer skin damage in HF-exposed rabbit skin (Burkhart et al, 1992).
    6) QUATERNARY AMMONIUM SALTS
    a) Soaking the burn in a quaternary ammonium compound solution has been recommended (Wetherhold & Shepherd, 1965) (Reinhart et al, 1966), and although successful it is uncomfortable to the patient and difficult to use in awkward or large areas.
    b) In a porcine model of hydrofluoric acid burns topical application of iced benzalkonium chloride (17%) was more effective than topical calcium gluconate gel (2.5%), calcium gluconate injections (5% or 10%), topical calcium acetate (10%) soaks, or benzethonium chloride soaks in reducing the gross size and severity of skin lesions produced after a 9 minute exposure to 38% hydrofluoric acid (Dunn et al, 1992). Calcium acetate soaks (10%) were most effective in reducing the gross size and severity of lesions produced after 15 minutes exposure to 38% hydrofluoric acid.
    c) In the same study benzalkonium chloride (17%) soaks, calcium acetate (10%) soaks, calcium gluconate gel (2.5%), and calcium gluconate injection (5%) were all effective in reducing the histologic severity of injury, while benzethonium chloride soaks were less effective and 10% calcium gluconate injection increased the severity of injury (Dunn et al, 1992).
    7) IODINE PREPARATIONS
    a) ANIMAL STUDY - In an animal study, it was determined that postexposure treatment with an iodine ointment was efficacious upon hydrofluoric acid-induced skin burns. Statistically significant reductions of 76% and 68% in ulceration areas were noted at intervals of 5 and 10 minutes between exposure and treatment; however, a weaker effect was observed at a longer time interval of 15 minutes (a 56% reduction in the ulceration area). It was speculated that the protective effect of iodine may be derived from its ability to inhibit apoptosis or proteinase activity crucial for the evolution of skin damage. The authors suggested the therapeutic usage of these iodine preparations for hydrofluoric acid-induced skin burns (Wormser et al, 2002).
    G) EXCISION
    1) SURGICAL THERAPY
    a) In patients with extensive skin damage over a small surface area and refractory hypocalcemia, immediate excision of the affected skin may be indicated. Packing the wound with benzalkonium chloride solution until calcium status is stable, followed by split-thickness skin grafting, has been recommended (Buckingham, 1988).
    b) In patients without refractory hypocalcemia, immediate excision is not recommended unless necrotic tissue necessitates debridement. A conservative initial approach with local calcium injections has been suggested (Craig, 1964).
    H) NAIL DAMAGE
    1) FINGERNAIL REMOVAL
    a) Exposure of the subungual (nailbed) tissue to HF is particularly painful and difficult to decontaminate. Nail removal is probably not necessary for exposures to concentrations of less than 10%; more concentrated solutions may produce tissue necrosis. The nail plate can be split, lifted, or totally removed in cases of severe exposure to facilitate decontamination and calcium therapy (Roberts et al, 1989). This disfiguring procedure may not be necessary when regional intravenous or intraarterial calcium salt treatment is initiated in a timely manner.
    I) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Fluoride is removed by dialysis, but patients with severe toxicity will likely be hemodynamically unstable.
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) CASE REPORT - A 46-year-old man developed severe fluoride intoxication and recurrent ventricular fibrillation 3.5 hours following occupational exposure of 71% hydrofluoric acid to 7% of his total body surface area. Following immediate parenteral administration of calcium and magnesium sulfate, his serum electrolyte levels normalized; however, a urine sample, obtained 8 hours postexposure showed a fluoride concentration of 5800 mcmol/L (upper reference limit is 105 mcmol/L). Hemodialysis was performed (with a standard filter and a blood flow of 300 mL/min) and, 8 hours later, the patient's urine fluoride concentration had decreased to 3850 mcmol/L and his ventricular fibrillation had resolved. Thirty hours postexposure, continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was started and continued for 48 hours. Two hours following the end of CVVHD treatment (80 hours postexposure), his urine fluoride concentration was 260 mcmol/L. One month postexposure, the patient was discharged (Bjornhagen et al, 2003).

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    a) ORAL
    1) A 70-year-old woman survived 2 separate ingestions of up to 2 ounces of a rust removal agent containing 12% hydrofluoric acid following aggressive calcium and magnesium replacement to prevent or treat the development of cardiac arrhythmias (Stremski et al, 1991).
    a) She developed lidocaine resistant ventricular fibrillation 2 hours after the first ingestion.
    b) Ten ampules of intravenous calcium gluconate and 2 grams of magnesium sulfate were administered over a 7 hour period for correction of hypocalcemia (6.3 mg/dL) and hypomagnesemia (0.9 mEq/L).
    c) She was cardioverted 31 times during a 7 hour period for treatment of ventricular fibrillation.
    d) Nine ampules of calcium gluconate and 5 grams of magnesium sulfate were administered intravenously in a 6 hour period following the second similar ingestion and ventricular fibrillation did not occur.
    2) Oral ingestion of an unknown rust remover resulted in death within 90 minutes. The calcium level upon arrival to the emergency department was 3.1 mg/dL with a plasma fluoride of 35.2 mg/L. Post mortem findings included hemorrhagic pulmonary edema and gastritis, without ulceration (Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986).
    3) A 33-year-old man reportedly ingested 100 ml of 10% HF. He presented to the ED with hematemesis and abdominal pain. His blood pressure decreased to 84/63 and the patient was given IV calcium chloride. His initial serum calcium level was 1.91 mmol/L (ionized 0.78 mmol/L). He developed ventricular fibrillation (VF) and was defibrillated and given 10 mL of 10% calcium chloride and 1 gram of magnesium sulfate. He suffered 5 additional VF arrests. He survived after dialysis for renal failure. A CT scan of the abdomen suggested edema of the stomach and small bowel (Chan & Duggin, 1997).
    b) INHALATION
    1) A 40-year-old man who experienced inhalation exposure to hydrofluoric acid (HF) while retrieving a machine part from a container containing concentrated HF and sulfuric acid presented 9 hours after the exposure with severe hypoxia and metabolic acidosis (pH 7.31, HCO3 17). The patient was intubated and treated with nebulized calcium gluconate 2.5%. The patient's recovery was complicated by respiratory failure, multiple pneumonias, a pulmonary embolus, and pulmonary hypertension. Twelve weeks after exposure, the patient was breathing via a tracheostomy and was transferred to a rehabilitation center (Tsonis et al, 2008).
    c) DERMAL
    1) Profound hypocalcemia (total serum calcium 3.5 mg/dL, ionized calcium 1.7 mg/dL) occurred 6 hours after an 8% body surface area burn with 70% hydrofluoric acid (Mullett et al, 1987). This patient died from refractory ventricular fibrillation.
    2) Profound hypocalcemia (3.5 mg/dL and 4.1 mg/dL) was successfully treated with aggressive parenteral and subeschar calcium injections in a 38-year-old man with a 2.5% body surface area burn with 60% HF and a 50-year-old man with a 22% body surface area burn with 70% HF, respectively (Greco et al, 1988).
    3) A 48-year-old man developed erythema and second-degree burns to 3.5% of his body surface area following dermal exposure to 70% HF. He immediately showered and applied 5% calcium gluconate gel, and arrived at the hospital 45 minutes later; ECG showed QTc prolongation and ventricular tachycardia. Initial total and ionized calcium levels were 5.6 mg/dL and 0.8 mmol/L, respectively. Other lab tests revealed hypokalemia (2.1 mmol/L) and hypomagnesemia (0.25 mmol/L). All electrolyte abnormalities were corrected with IV replacement, and cardiac rhythm returned to sinus rhythm approximately 20 hours post admission. A full recovery without sequelae was reported (Dalamaga et al, 2008).
    d) OTHER
    1) IMMERSION
    a) A 51-year-old man developed hypocalcemia, wheezing, diffuse dermal erythema, elevated liver enzymes, and ocular burns with bilateral total corneal epithelial defects after falling into a tank containing 10% to 12% HF and anhydrous ammonia (Sadove et al, 1990).
    1) He was bathed in a Hubbard tank filled with 10% calcium gluconate gel, received IV calcium and magnesium, and had both eyes patched.
    2) Elevated serum and urine fluoride levels and liver enzymes resolved within 25 days, one eye required intermittent patching for 2 months because of a persistent epithelial defect, and anosmia persisted for 6 months.
    2) RECTAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) A 36-year-old man presented with rectal pain and bloody diarrhea, hypocalcemia and leukocytosis 36 hours after administering an HF enema (unknown concentration and volume). He was treated with calcium carbonate enemas.
    1) He underwent partial sigmoid resection for treatment of acute colitis with rectal and sigmoid ulceration and necrosis and peritonitis. Five months later he presented with rectal stricture requiring resection (Cappell & Simon, 1993).
    B) PEDIATRIC
    1) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    a) DERMAL
    1) A 14-month-old child with hydrofluoric acid burns over 11% of his body suffered cardiac arrest in association with severe hypocalcemia and hyperfluoridemia. The child survived following treatment including topical, sub-eschar, and intravenous calcium gluconate administration (Bordelon et al, 1993).
    2) A 7-year-old girl with dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid and burns over 10% total body surface area, (serum calcium level 5.5 mg/dL) suffered hypotension, pulmonary edema and four cardiac arrests requiring extensive resuscitation. She was pronounced dead approximately 6 hours after the exposure (Speranza et al, 2002).

Summary

    A) INGESTION: ADULT: Electrolyte imbalance, dysrhythmias and death have been reported after 2 to 3 ounces of 6 to 8% HF. CHILD: The minimum toxic dose for a 10 kg child is 50 mg.
    B) INHALATION: 30 ppm is considered immediately dangerous to life and health. Estimates of the lowest lethal concentrations for HF range from 50 to 250 ppm for a 5 minute exposure.
    C) DERMAL: Severe systemic toxicity and death have been reported following 2.5% body surface area (BSA) burns from 100% HF, 8% BSA burns from 70% HF, and 11% BSA burns from 23% HF.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL
    a) Death has occurred after ingestion of 1.5 grams of hydrofluoric acid (concentration unknown) within 6.5 hours of ingestion. Postmortem findings in this case revealed no gross tissue damage and a liver fluoride level of 165 mcg/100 g (Curry, 1962).
    b) A 33-year-old man who ingested 3 to 4 oz of a rust remover (unstated HF concentration) died within 45 to 60 minutes. At autopsy, severe mucosal edema of the stomach and hemorrhage and necrosis of the pancreas were noted. Postmortem blood fluoride level was 56.2 mg/L (Menchel & Dunn, 1984).
    c) Two adults died after drinking 3 and 6 oz respectively of a product containing 6 to 8% HF (Kao et al, 1999).
    d) Oral ingestion of 15 mL of a 9% solution was reported to cause death (Webster, 1930).
    e) Following a suicidal ingestion of an unknown quantity of a 10% hydrofluoric acid and 25% ammonium bifluoride solution, a 43-year-old man was found dead. Blood fluoride concentration was reported to be 13 mg/L. Postmortem description of the body was notable for a lack of evidence of burns expected with ingestion (Bost & Springfield, 1995).
    2) DERMAL
    a) A dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid over a 2.5% total body surface area resulted in death. The serum calcium level was 2.2 mg/dL (Tepperman, 1980). A dermal exposure to 80% hydrofluoric acid over 5% total body surface area resulted in death. Serial ionized calcium levels, in spite of IV calcium gluconate therapy, were 0.57, 1.84, 0.63, and 0.74 mmol/L (Hung et al, 1998).
    b) A dermal exposure to 70% hydrofluoric acid over a 10% total body surface area resulted in death of a 7-year-old girl; the serum calcium level was 5.5 mg/dL (Speranza et al, 2002).
    c) An adult patient who developed 25% total body surface area second degree burns after exposure to a 70% hydrofluoric acid preparation died in cardiac arrest (El Saadi et al, 1989). Ionized serum calcium level was 1.7 mg/dL (normal: 4 to 4.8) immediately premortem (El Saadi et al, 1989).
    d) Two workers died following a splash exposure of 70% hydrofluoric acid to the face, chest, arms and legs. Both workers were promptly removed from site of exposure. Clothing was removed and burns were initially treated at the workplace with a cold shower and alcohol was applied to burn areas. Suitable protective clothing was not worn at the workplace (Chan et al, 1987).
    e) A woman died from severe chemical burns of the skin and lungs, with intense pulmonary hemorrhagic edema after having acid thrown onto her face during an attack (Chela et al, 1989).
    f) A patient with HF burns involving 8% of his body died from intractable cardiac dysrhythmia with profound hypocalcemia (Mullett et al, 1987).
    g) For the period 1984 through 1994, nine fatal unintentional occupational poisonings due to hydrofluoric acid were reported by OSHA in the US. Of these, 4 deaths were from skin contact with concentrated HF, and 5 deaths were from a combination of both skin contact and inhalation of vapor (Blodgett et al, 2001).
    3) INHALATION
    a) Estimates of the lowest lethal concentrations for hydrogen fluoride range from 50 to 250 ppm for 5 minute exposure and are based on accidental, voluntary and occupational exposure information (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    b) LCLo (INHL) HUMAN - 50 ppm for 30 minutes (RTECS , 2001).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) DERMAL
    a) Dermal exposure to solutions containing greater than 50% HF produces immediate burning, erythema and tissue damage, whereas exposure to 20% to 50% HF results in pain and erythema which may be delayed up to 1 to 8 hours. Exposure to solutions containing less than 20% HF results in erythema and pain delayed up to 24 hours after exposure (Iverson et al, 1971; Dibbell et al, 1970).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old man was splashed on the right thigh with 20% hydrofluoric acid, and developed 3% total body surface area first-degree burn. He immediately washed and applied 2.5% calcium gluconate gel to the affected area. On presentation, all serum electrolytes were normal, and he had mild leukocytosis and mild metabolic acidosis. He later developed hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, bradycardia, and asystole 16 hours after exposure. Following resuscitation and treatment with IV 10% calcium chloride, 10% calcium glucose, 20% magnesium sulfate, and 15% potassium chloride, he was stabilized and returned to sinus bradycardia, which persisted from 9 to 49 hours postexposure. Overall, 112 mEq IV calcium, 97.2 mEq IV magnesium, and 142 mEq of IV and oral potassium were administered and he gradually recovered and was discharged after 4 days of hospitalization (Wu et al, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT - A 48-year-old man developed erythema and second-degree burns to 3.5% of his body surface area following dermal exposure to 70% HF. He immediately showered and applied 5% calcium glucontae gel, and arrived at the hospital 45 minutes later; ECG showed QTc prolongation and ventricular tachycardia. Initial total and ionized calcium levels were 5.6 mg/dL and 0.8 mmol/L, respectively. Other lab tests revealed hypokalemia (2.1 mmol/L) and hypomagnesemia (0.25 mmol/L). All electrolyte abnormalities were corrected with IV replacement, and cardiac rhythm returned to sinus approximately 20 hours post admission. A full recovery without sequelae was reported (Dalamaga et al, 2008).
    d) In one study it was reported that 7% HF acid produced symptoms in 1 to several hours, 12% acid produced symptoms in under an hour, and 14.5% solutions produced symptoms immediately (Velvart, 1983).
    e) Seven patients exposed to 5% HF solution developed symptoms (pain, erythema and significant edema) within 5 to 24 hours. Three patients developed extensive bullae formation, maceration, and erosion. When erosions and necrosis were present, the time of re-epithelialization varied from 10 to 30 days (Asvesti et al, 1997).
    f) Two children who developed 3% to 4% and 8% to 10% total body surface area first degree burns after exposure to a 6% to 11% hydrofluoric acid preparation had serial serum calcium levels and cardiac monitoring which remained normal. No systemic toxicity developed from this exposure (El Saadi et al, 1989).
    g) In a report of 156 cases of hydrofluoric acid exposure secondary to clothing that was worn after being treated with a hydrofluoric acid containing spot and stain remover. Washing or rinsing of the clothing prior to use was reported in 24% of cases and machine washing prior to use was done in 34% of cases. Complaints persisted for a mean of 5.6 days (range 1 to 90 days) and 79.5% of cases were treated with topical calcium preparations (Phillips et al, 1991).
    2) OCULAR
    a) Limited morbidity (transient ocular irritation and pain (8/8), fluorescein stain uptake (4/7), conjunctivitis (7/8), transient corneal clouding (1/8)) was noted in 8 cases of ocular hydrofluoric acid (13% concentration or less) splash exposure (Phillips et al, 1991).
    b) The mean duration of corneal irregularity was 2.7 days (range 2 to 3 days).
    1) Home irrigation and emergency department irrigation was performed in all cases. Treatment included antibiotics (2/8), steroids (1/8), and 10% calcium gluconate (1/8) for relief of pain.
    3) ORAL
    a) The minimal oral toxic dose of fluoride for a 10 kg child is reported to be 50 mg (Perry, 2001).
    b) A 70-year-old woman survived 2 separate ingestions of up to 2 ounces of a rust removal agent containing 12% hydrofluoric acid following aggressive calcium and magnesium replacement and repeated defibrillation to treat refractory ventricular fibrillation (Stremski et al, 1991).
    c) Following the ingestion of a cupful of a rust-removal agent (estimated to be 16.6 times the lethal dose of HF), a 35-year-old man developed ECG signs of tented T wave which was followed by extreme high T wave. The patient recovered following aggressive therapy with calcium gluconate IV and calcium carbonate via NG tube (Yu-Jang et al, 2001).
    d) Ingestion of about 50 mL of a rust removal agent (12% HF and 16% ammonium bifluoride) in a 38-year-old man resulted in severe erosive esophagitis and gastritis with recovery following aggressive therapy with oral and intravenous magnesium. No dysrhythmias were noted on admission (Chu et al, 2001).
    4) INJECTION
    a) A 35-year-old man was admitted 2 hours after an intentional intradermal injection of approximately 5 milliliters of a rust removal solution containing 7% hydrofluoric acid. Physical examination revealed a cutaneous full-thickness chemical burn.
    1) The burn was copiously washed with isotonic solution and treated with cutaneous and subcutaneous injections of magnesium chloride, 10% calcium gluconate solution and 2% Xylocaine. Plastic surgery interventions were later required. The patient developed severe and persistent hypocalcemia 7 hours after the incident followed by hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and hypochloremia (Gallerani et al, 1998).
    5) INHALATION
    a) TCLo (INHL) HUMAN - 100 mg/m(3) per minute (RTECS , 2001)
    b) TCLo (INHL) HUMAN - 32 ppm (OHM/TADS , 1990)
    c) Short term inhalation limits - 50 ppm for 60 minutes (CHRIS , 1990)
    d) CASE REPORT: Following inhalation of fumes from a glass etching cream for approximately one hour, a 41-year-old man presented to the emergency department with throat irritation, burning chest pain, and dyspnea. The glass etching cream, that the patient was using to remove scratches from his glasses, was found to contain 28% to 39% ammonium bifluoride and sodium bifluoride. At presentation his vital signs were normal, oxygen saturation was 100%, laboratory data (ie, CBC, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function) were within normal limits, there were no ECG abnormalities (QRS 84, QTc 440), and a chest x-ray indicated clear lungs. Physical exam revealed pharyngeal erythema. Treatment was initiated with 2.5% nebulized calcium gluconate resulting in immediate improvement in symptoms; however, continued recurrence of pain and dyspnea necessitated a total of 4 rounds of therapy over a 12-hour period. During therapy, the patient's QTc interval peaked at 458; however, he became asymptomatic, with normal ECG intervals, and was discharged (Kessler et al, 2015).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Lethal plasma fluoride concentrations following ingestion of hydrofluoric acid have ranged from 8.3 to 56.2 mg/L (Curry, 1962; Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986; Menchel & Dunn, 1984); however, fluoride levels of 2.6 mg/L from other sources have resulted in fatalities (Baselt, 2000).
    b) Blood and vitreous humor concentrations of fluoride ions in a fatality from a hydrofluoric acid splash accident were 0.98 mEq/L and 0.63 mEq/L, respectively (Hung et al, 1998).
    c) Background fluoride levels are less than 0.1 mg/L (Manoguerra & Neuman, 1986).
    d) Following a suicidal ingestion of an unknown quantity of a 10% hydrofluoric acid and 25% ammonium bifluoride solution, a 43-year-old male was found dead. Blood fluoride concentration was reported to be 13 mg/L (Bost & Springfield, 1995).
    e) A serum fluoride level of 2 mg/L was reported in an 82-year-old woman more than 6 hours after ingestion of 8 ounces of a rust remover. Urine fluoride level was 72.46 mg/L (Rivera et al, 2002).
    f) Post-mortem fluoride concentrations from a 43-year-old man, who intentionally ingested a 10 fluid ounce bottle of rust remover containing hydrofluoric acid solution, are as follows (Cordero et al, 2004):
    SPECIMEN FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION (PPM)
    Bile 6.5
    Gastric 39.0
    Liver 6.0
    Kidney 10.0
    Skeletal muscle 4.5
    Urine 5.0
    Vitreous humor 4.5

    g) CASE REPORT - A 65-year-old man, who received third degree burns to 5% of his total body surface area after being splashed in the face with hydrofluoric acid solution, complained of chest pain 5 minutes post-exposure. Thirty minutes after the accident, he developed cardiopulmonary arrest. Initial laboratory tests revealed hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia (4.9 mg/dL and 6.2 mEq/L, respectively). Despite aggressive resuscitative measures, the patient died 1.5 hours after the accident. Post-mortem analyses of the serum, urine, and fluids of the pericardium and thoracic cavity showed elevated fluoride concentrations (6.38, 6.60, 6.17, and 5.37 mg/dL, respectively) (Takase et al, 2004).
    h) CASE REPORT - Ionized fluoride concentrations in the heart, thoracic cavity, and urine inside the bladder of a 65-year-old man, following a fatal inhalation exposure of liquefied hydrogen fluoride, were 61 mcg/mL, 54 mcg/mL, and 66 mcg/mL, respectively (Dote et al, 2003).
    i) CASE REPORT - The post-mortem fluoride concentrations in the gastric contents, urine, and heart blood of a 29-year-old man, following dermal exposure of 70% hydrofluoric acid, were 1.7 mg/L, 15 mg/L, and 14 mg/L, respectively (Wedler et al, 2005).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS7664-39-3 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Hydrogen fluoride, as F
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 0.5 ppm
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling: 2 ppm
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: Not Listed
    2) Codes: BEI, Skin
    3) Definitions:
    a) BEI: The BEI notation is listed when a BEI is also recommended for the substance listed. Biological monitoring should be instituted for such substances to evaluate the total exposure from all sources, including dermal, ingestion, or non-occupational.
    b) Skin: This refers to the potential significant contribution to the overall exposure by the cutaneous route, including mucous membranes and the eyes, either by contact with vapors or, of likely greater significance, by direct skin contact with the substance. It should be noted that although some materials are capable of causing irritation, dermatitis, and sensitization in workers, these properties are not considered relevant when assigning a skin notation. Rather, data from acute dermal studies and repeated dose dermal studies in animals or humans, along with the ability of the chemical to be absorbed, are integrated in the decision-making toward assignment of the skin designation. Use of the skin designation provides an alert that air sampling would not be sufficient by itself in quantifying exposure from the substance and that measures to prevent significant cutaneous absorption may be warranted. Please see "Definitions and Notations" (in TLV booklet) for full definition.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): URT, LRT, skin, and eye irr; fluorosis
    d) Molecular Weight: 20.01
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS7664-39-3 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Hydrogen fluoride (as F)
    2) REL:
    a) TWA: 3 ppm (2.5 mg/m(3))
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling: 6 ppm (5 mg/m(3)) [15-minute]
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s):
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 30 ppm
    b) Note(s): Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS7664-39-3 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed ; Listed as: Hydrogen fluoride, as F
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Hydrogen fluoride (as F)
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS7664-39-3 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Hydrogen fluoride (as F)
    2) Table Z-1 for Hydrogen fluoride (as F):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm:
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3:
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value:
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed
    3) Table Z-2 for Hydrogen fluoride (Z37.28-1969):
    a) 8-hour TWA:3 ppm
    b) Acceptable Ceiling Concentration:
    c) Acceptable Maximum Peak above the Ceiling Concentration for an 8-hour Shift:
    1) Concentration:
    2) Maximum Duration:
    d) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: Lewis, 1996 OHM/TADS, 1998 RTECS, 2001
    1) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    a) 32 ppm
    b) Male, 100 mg/m(3) for 1M -- NOSE,EYE,ACID

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) The anhydrous form has a great affinity for water and produces considerable heat as it dissolves.
    B) There are several proposed toxicologic mechanisms.
    1) The fluoride ion, which is highly toxic, is a direct cellular poison which inhibits many enzyme systems by binding to metal-containing enzymes, thereby inactivating them. The enzyme systems affected include: acetylcholinesterase, adenyl cyclase, and sodium-potassium ATPase (Perry, 2001).
    a) Excessive cholinergic stimulation, due to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, may lead to increased secretions and bronchospasm.
    2) Hydrogen fluoride passes easily through cell membranes by nonionic diffusion. The free fluoride ion then forms complexes primarily with calcium and, to a lesser extent, magnesium. The complexes formed are insoluble and precipitate in tissues, resulting in pain and tissue destruction. Depletion of serum calcium and magnesium results at high levels of free fluoride. Small amounts of fluoride can drastically disrupt metabolism and even result in severe hypocalcemia (Harbison, 1998; Perry, 2001).
    3) In animal studies it has been shown that once hyperkalemia develops, it is irreversible. It is hypothesized that sodium fluoride inhibits Na+ -K+ ATPase which then stimulates Na+ -Ca2+ exchange and raises intracellular calcium. The elevated intracellular calcium triggers the potassium efflux; measures to prevent the increase in intracellular calcium via blocking other possible ports of Ca2+ entry in fluoridated tissue have been ineffective (McIvor & Cummings, 1987).
    4) Fluoride binds to potassium and magnesium ions leading to myocardial irritability and dysrhythmias (Baltazar et al, 1980).
    5) Fluoride may be directly toxic to the CNS. CNS manifestations (lethargy, weakness, loss of deep tendon reflexes) may also be due to inhibition of glycolysis, although this has not yet been established (Perry, 2001).

Physical Characteristics

    A) HYDROGEN FLUORIDE is a clear, colorless, fuming and corrosive liquid or gas that is soluble in water and fumes at concentrations over 48% to form a white mist when in contact with air (ILO, 1983) NFPA, 1986; (AAR, 1987; ITI, 1988; Budavari, 1996) OSHA, 1989c; (OHM/TADS , 1990).
    B) HYDROFLUORIC ACID is a watery liquid which is colorless to green with an irritating odor that sinks and is soluble in water (CHRIS , 1990).
    C) HYDROGEN FLUORIDE, ANHYDROUS in liquid form, is colorless and has a sharp, irritating odor (CHRIS , 1990; Mackison et al, 1981).
    D) HYDROGEN FLUORIDE AS A GAS, liquefies at 19.5 degrees C, and in aqueous solution is known as hydrofluoric acid (AAR, 1987) Proctor et al., 1988).
    E) HYDROFLUORIC ACID GAS has a strong, irritating odor (Mackison et al, 1981; HSDB , 1991; Sittig, 1985).

Ph

    A) Anhydrous hydrogen fluoride is one of the most acidic substances known (Budavari, 1996).
    1) Hydrofluoric acid is one of the most caustic and corrosive of the inorganic acids (Adams, 1983; Wetherhold & Shepherd, 1965).
    B) As an aqueous solution, it is a weak acid (Budavari, 1996; HSDB , 1990).
    1) Weak Acid: Ka = 6.46x10(-4) mol/L (Budavari, 1996)
    C) If soil pH is > 6.5, fluorides may become bound. A high calcium content can immobilize fluorides which can be damaging to plants when present in acid soils (HSDB , 1990).

Molecular Weight

    A) 20.01

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) Hydrogen Fluoride, Anhydrous
    a) 0.042 ppm (ACGIH, 1991)
    b) 0.5-3 ppm (HSDB , 1998)
    c) Low: 0.0333 mg/m(3) (HSDB , 1998)
    d) High: 0.1333 mg/m(3) (HSDB , 1998)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, 10-A, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1987, pp 373-376.
    14) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1996.
    15) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 1998.
    16) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    17) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    18) ATSDR: Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluoride (F), Publication No. TP-91/17, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
    19) Adams RM: Occupational Skin Disease, Grune & Stratton Inc, New York, NY, 1983, pp 9-159.
    20) Ajbaev TH: Gig Sanit 1976; 5:6-10.
    21) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    22) Anderson WJ & Anderson JR: Hydrofluoric acid burns of the hand: mechanism of injury and treatment. J Hand Surg 1988; 13A:52-57.
    23) Anon: American Heart Association/International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and emergency Cardiovascular Care: an international consensus on science. Circulation 2000; 102:I1-I384.
    24) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    25) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    26) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 1994.
    27) Asvesti C, Guadagni F, & Anastasiadis G: Hydrofluoric acid burns. Cutis 1997; 59:306-308.
    28) Baltazar RF, Mower MM, & Reider R: Acute fluoride poisoning leading to fatal hyperkalemia. Chest 1980; 78:660-663.
    29) Barkin RM: Emergency Pediatrics, 2nd ed, CV Mosby Co, St. Louis, MO, 1986.
    30) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    31) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    32) Bentur Y, Tannenbaum S, & Yaffe Y: The role of calcium gluconate in the treatment of hydrofluoric acid eye burn. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1488-1490.
    33) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    34) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    35) Beveridge M, Juurlink DN, & Khalifa M: Rectal hydrofluoric acid exposure (abstract), EAPCCT - European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, XX International Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
    36) Bjornhagen V, Hojer J, Karlson-Stiber C, et al: Hydrofluoric acid-induced burns and life-threatening systemic poisoning-favorable outcome after hemodialysis. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41:855-860.
    37) Blodgett DW, Suruda AJ, & Crouch BI: Fatal unintentional occupational poisonings by hydrofluoric acid in the U.S. Am J Ind Med 2001; 40:215-220.
    38) Blunt CP: Treatment of hydrofluoric acid skin burns by injection with calcium gluconate. Indust Med Surg 1964; 32:869-871.
    39) Bordelon BM, Saffle JR, & Morris SE: Systemic fluoride toxicity in a child with hydrofluoric acid burns: case report. J Trauma 1993; 34:437-439.
    40) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    41) Bost RO & Springfield A: Fatal hydrofluoric acid ingestion: a suicide case report. J Analyt Toxicol 1995; 19:535-536.
    42) Boyer EW, Walker N, & Woolf A: Inhalational exposure to hydrogen fluoride treated with nebulized calcium gluconate (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:545.
    43) Bracken WM, Cuppage F, & McLaury RL: Comparative effectiveness of topical treatment for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Occup Med 1985; 27:733-739.
    44) Braun J, Stob H, & Zober A: Intoxication following the inhalation of hydrogen fluoride. Arch Toxicol 1984; 56:50-54.
    45) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    46) Brown TD: The treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. J Soc Occup Med 1974; 24:80-89.
    47) Bryant S & Greenberg M: Hydrofluoric acid as an agent for self-mutilation (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:295-296.
    48) Buckingham FM: Surgery: A radical approach to severe hydrofluoric acid burns. J Occup Med 1988; 30:873-874.
    49) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996, pp 822.
    50) Burkhart K, Brent J, & Kirk M: Treatment of dermal HF burns with topical magnesium and calcium (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1992; 34:344.
    51) Burkhart KK, Brent J, Kirk MA, et al: Comparison of topical magnesium and calcium treatment for dermal hydrofluoric acid burns.. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24:9-13.
    52) CHEMINFO : Chemical Information. (CD-ROM Version). Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 1990.
    53) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1990; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    54) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    55) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 7/31/1998a; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    56) CIM: Chemical Information Manual, Government Institutes, Inc, Rockville, MD, 1988.
    57) Cappell MS & Simon T: Fulminant acute colitis following a self-administered hydrofluoric acid enema. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:122-126.
    58) Caravati EM: Acute hydrofluoric acid exposure. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:143-150.
    59) Carney SA, Hall M, & Lawrence JC: Rationale of the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:317-321.
    60) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    61) Chameides L: Textbook of Pediatric Advanced Life Support, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX, 1988.
    62) Chan BSH & Duggin GG: Survival after a massive hydrofluoric acid ingestion. Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:307-309.
    63) Chan KM, Svancarek WP, & Creer M: Fatality due to acute hydrofluoric acid exposure. Clin Toxicol 1987; 25:333-339.
    64) Chela A, Reig R, & Sanz P: Death due to hydrofluoric acid. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1989; 10:47-48.
    65) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    66) Chick LR & Borah G: Calcium carbonate gel therapy for hydrofluoric acid burns of the hand. Plast Reconst Surg 1990; 86:935-940.
    67) Chu J, Ying R, & Hoffman RS: Survival after intentional hydrofluoric (HF) acid ingestion (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:509.
    68) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2E & 2F, Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    69) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    70) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    71) Cordero SC, Goodhue WW, Splichal EM, et al: A fatality due to ingestion of hydrofluoric acid. J Analyt Toxicol 2004; 28:211-213.
    72) Cox RD & Osgood KA: Evaluation of intravenous magnesium sulfate for the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:123-136.
    73) Craig RDP: Hydrofluoric acid burns of the hands. Br J Plast Surg 1964; 17:53-59.
    74) Cummings CC & McIvor ME: Fluoride-induced hyperkalemia: the role of Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. Am J Emerg Med 1988; 6:1-3.
    75) Curry AS: Twenty-one uncommon cases of poisoning. Br Med J 1962; 1:687-689.
    76) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    77) Dalamaga M, Karmaniolas K, Nikolaidou A, et al: Hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypokalemia following hydrofluoric acid chemical injury. J Burn Care Res 2008; 29(3):541-543.
    78) Danilov VB: Med Zh Uzb 1975; 4:31-32.
    79) Derelanko MJ: J Toxicol Cutaneous Ocul Toxicol 1985; 4:73-85.
    80) Dibbell DG, Iverson RE, & Jones W: HF burns of the hands. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52A:931-936.
    81) Dote T, Kono K, Usuda K, et al: Lethal inhalation exposure during maintenance operation of a hydrogen fluoride liquefying tank. Toxicol Indust Health 2003; 19:51-54.
    82) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    83) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    84) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    85) Dunn BJ, MacKinnon MA, & Knowlden NF: Hydrofluoric acid dermal burns: an assessment of treatment efficacy using an experimental pig model. J Occup Med 1992; 34:902-909.
    86) EPA: EPA chemical profile on hydrogen fluoride, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1985.
    87) EPA: Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration, EPA 68-03-3025, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1981.
    88) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    89) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    90) Edinburg M & Swift R: Hydrofluoric acid burns of the hands: a case report and suggested management. Aust NZ J Surg 1989; 59:88-91.
    91) El Saadi MS, Hall AH, & Hall PK: Hydrofluoric acid dermal exposure. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:243-247.
    92) Ellenhorn MJ: Ellenhorn"s medical toxicology: diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning., 2nd. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1997, pp 98-99, 526-7, 538-9.
    93) Forrester MB: Work-related health emergency cases due to hydrofluoric acid exposures reported to Texas poison centers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2012; 25(4):456-462.
    94) Foster DE & Barone JA: Rectal hydrofluoric acid exposure. Clin Pharm 1989; 8:516-518.
    95) Franzblau A & Sahakian N: Asthma following household exposure to hydrofluoric acid. Am J Indust Med 2003; 44:321-324.
    96) Gallerani M, Bettoli V, & Peron L: Systemic and topical effects of intradermal hydrofluoric acid. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16:521-522.
    97) Garrettson LK & Siegel DC: Hydrofluoric acid in the automotive industry: epidemiology (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:354.
    98) Garrido P, Nogue S, & Sanz P: Hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia due to occupational dermal contact with hydrofluoric acid (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:291.
    99) Gatiyatullina EZ & Gileva EA: Genetika 1973; 9:115-120.
    100) Gerdes RA: Atmos Environ 1971; 5:117-122.
    101) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    102) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 3rd ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 490-492.
    103) Greco RJ, Hartford CE, & Haith LR: Hydrofluoric acid-induced hypocalcemia. J Trauma 1988; 28:1593-1596.
    104) Greendyke RM & Hodge HC: Accidental death due to hydrofluoric acid. J Forens Sci 1964; 9:383-390.
    105) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    106) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1990; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    107) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    108) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    109) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    110) Hall AH, Blomet J, & Mathieu L: Topical treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns: a blind controlled experimental study (letter). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41:1031-1032.
    111) Haque A & Saleem AF: On admission hypomagnesemia in critically ill children: Risk factors and outcome. Indian J Pediatr 2009; 76(12):1227-1230.
    112) Harbison RM: Hamilton and Hardy's industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    113) Harris JC, Rumack BH, & Bregman DJ: Comparative efficacy of injectable calcium and magnesium salts in the therapy of hydrofluoric acid burns. Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:1027-1032.
    114) Hatai JK, Weber JN, & Doizaki K: Hydrofluoric acid burns of the eye: report of possible delayed toxicity. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol 1986; 5:179-184.
    115) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughees JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996a.
    116) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    117) Hatzifotis M, Williams A, Muller M, et al: Hydrofluoric acid burns. Burns 2004; 30:156-159.
    118) Henry JA & Hla KK: Intravenous regional calcium gluconate perfusion for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1992; 30:203-207.
    119) Hojer J, Personne M, Hulten P, et al: Topical treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns: a blind controlled experimental study. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(7):861-866.
    120) Holstege C, Baer A, & Brady WJ: The electrocardiographic toxidrome: the ECG presentation of hydrofluoric acid ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:171-176.
    121) Huisman LC, Teijink JAW, & Overbosch EH: An atypical chemical burn. Lancet 2001; 358:1510.
    122) Hulten P, Hojer J, Ludwigs U, et al: Hexafluorine vs. standard decontamination to reduce systemic toxicity after dermal exposure to hydrofluoric acid. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:355-361.
    123) Hung OL, Flomenbaum M, & Flomenbaum NE: Profound ionized hypocalcemia with arrhythmia and coagulopathy in a fatal hydrofluoric acid exposure (abstract). J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:448.
    124) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    125) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    126) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    127) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    128) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    129) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    130) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    131) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    132) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed, Vol 1, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983, pp 1085-1086.
    133) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1988, pp 275-276-669.
    134) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    135) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    136) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    137) Iverson RE, Laub DR, & Madison MS: Hydrofluoric acid burns. Plastic Reconst Surg 1971; 48:107-112.
    138) Jones AL & Flanagan RJ: Calcium Salts. In: Dart RC, Caravato EM, McGuigan MA, et al, eds. Medical Toxicology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    139) Kao WF, Dart RC, & Kuffner E: Ingestion of low-concentration hydrofluoric acid: an insidious and potentially fatal poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34:35-41.
    140) Kao WF, Deng JF, Chiang SC, et al: A simple, safe, and efficient way to treat severe fluoride poisoning-oral calcium or magnesium. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:33-40.
    141) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    142) Katz S & Stookey GK: J Dent Res 1973; 52:206-210.
    143) Kenchenko VG & Sharipova NP: Vopy Eksp Klin Ter Profil Prom Intoksikatsi. 1974.
    144) Kessler BD, Nitsche D, Calandrella C, et al: Acute dyspnea and pharyngeal irritation after inhalation of fumes from a concentrated fluoride-containing etching cream: 2015 Annual Meeting of the North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology (NACCT). Clin Toxicol 2015; 53(7):743-743.
    145) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    146) Klasner AE, Scalzo AJ, & Blume C: Marked hypocalcemia and ventricular fibrillation in two pediatric patients exposed to a fluoride-containing wheel cleaner. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28:713-718.
    147) Kleinfeld M: Acute pulmonary edema of chemical origin. Arch Environ Health 1965; 10:942-946.
    148) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    149) Kobec GP: Gig Sanit 1972; 37:113-114.
    150) Kohnlein HE & Achinger R: A new method of treatment of the hydrofluoric acid burns of the extremities. Chin Plastica 1982; 6:629-305.
    151) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    152) Kono K, Watanabe T, Dote T, et al: Successful treatments of lung injury and skin burn due to hydrofluoric acid exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000; 73 Suppl:93-97.
    153) Kono K, Yoshida Y, & Watanabe M: Serum fluoride as an indicator of occupational hydrofluoric acid exposure. Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1992; 64:343-346.
    154) Kraut JA & Madias NE: Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6(5):274-285.
    155) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    156) Largent EJ, Bovard PG, & Heyroth FF: Roentgenographic changes and urinary fluoride excretion among workmen engaged in the manufacture of inorganic fluorides. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1951; 65:42-48.
    157) Larsen MJ & Jensen SJ: Inactivation of hydrofluoric acid by solutions intended for gastric lavage. Pharmacol Toxicol 1991; 68:447-448.
    158) Lee DC, Wiley JF II, & Snyder JW II: Treatment of inhalational exposure to hydrofluoric acid with nebulized calcium gluconate (Letter). J Occup Med 1993; 35:470.
    159) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    160) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    161) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    162) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    163) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    164) Machle W & Kitzmiller K: J Ind Hyg 1935; 17:223-229.
    165) Mackison FW, Stricoff RS, & Partridge LJ Jr: NIOSH/OSHA -- Occupational Health Guidelines for Chemical Hazards. DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No 81-123 (3 VOLS), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1981, pp 1,3,5.
    166) Mangion SM, Beulke SH, & Braitberg G: Hydrofluoric acid burn from a household rust remover. Med J Aust 2001; 175:270-271.
    167) Manoguerra AS & Neuman TS: Fatal poisoning from acute hydrofluoric acid ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 1986; 4:362-363.
    168) Manrique AM, Arroyo M, Lin Y, et al: Magnesium supplementation during cardiopulmonary bypass to prevent junctional ectopic tachycardia after pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139(1):162-169.
    169) Mansdorf SZ: Anhydrous hydrofluoric acid. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987; 48:452.
    170) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    171) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    172) Martin HCO & Muller MJ: Hydrofluoric acid burns from a household rust remover (letter). Med J Aust 2002; 176:296.
    173) Martin ML, Hamilton R, & West MF: Potassium. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1986; 4:131-144.
    174) Martin TJ, Kang Y, Robertson KM, et al: Ionization and hemodynamic effects of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate in the absence of hepatic function. Anesthesiology 1990; 73(1):62-65.
    175) Mathieu L, Nehles J, Blomet J, et al: Efficacy of hexafluorine for emergent decontamination of hydrofluoric acid eye and skin splashes. Vet Human Toxicol 2001; 43:263-265.
    176) Matsuno K: The treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Occup Med 1996; 46:313-317.
    177) Mayer L & Guelich J: Hydrogen fluoride inhalation and burns. Arch Environ Health 1963; 7:445-447.
    178) Mayer TG & Gross PL: Fatal systemic fluorosis due to hydrofluoric acid burns. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:149-153.
    179) McCulley JP, Whiting DW, & Petitt MG: Hydrofluoric acid burns of the eye. J Occup Med 1983; 25:447-450.
    180) McIvor ME & Cummings CC: Sodium fluoride produces a K+ efflux by increasing intracellular Ca2+ through Na+-Ca2+ exchange. Toxicol Lett 1987; 38:169-176.
    181) McIvor ME, Cummings CE, & Mower MM: Sudden cardiac death from acute fluoride intoxication: the role of potassium. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:777-781.
    182) McIvor ME: Delayed fatal hyperkalemia in a patient with acute fluoride intoxication.. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:1165-1167.
    183) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    184) Menchel SM & Dunn WA: Hydrofluoric acid poisoning. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1984; 5:245-248.
    185) Meng Z, Meng H, & Cao X: Sister-chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of workers at a phosphate fertilizer factory. Mutat Res 1995; 334:243-246.
    186) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    187) Mullett T, Zoeller T, & Bingham H: Fatal hydrofluoric acid cutaneous exposure with refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Burn Care Rehabil 1987; 8:216-219.
    188) Murao M: Studies on the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burn. Bull Osaka Med Coll 1989; 35:39-48.
    189) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 11th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994.
    190) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    191) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    192) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    193) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    194) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    195) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    196) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    197) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    234) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    235) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    236) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    237) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    238) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    239) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    240) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    241) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    242) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    243) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    244) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    245) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    246) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    247) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    248) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    249) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    250) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    251) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    252) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    253) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    254) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    255) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    256) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    257) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    258) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    259) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    260) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    261) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    262) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    263) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    264) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    265) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    266) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    267) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    268) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    269) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    270) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    271) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    272) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    273) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    274) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    275) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    276) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    277) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    278) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    279) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    280) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    281) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    282) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1990; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    283) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    284) OSHA: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 29 CFR Part 1910; Air Contaminants; Final Rule, 54, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor, Washington, DC, 1989, pp 2332-2983.
    285) Pack MR: J Air Pollut Contr Assoc 1971; 21:133-137.
    286) Perry HE: Pediatric poisonings from household products: hydrofluoric acid and methacrylic acid. Curr Opinion Ped 2001; 13:157-161.
    287) Phillips S, Brent J, & Kulig K: Ocular hydrofluoric acid exposure from rust remover products in the home (abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1991; 33:358.
    288) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    289) Product Information: Cordarone(R) oral tablets, amiodarone HCl oral tablets. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc (per FDA), Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
    290) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    291) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    292) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    293) Raffle PA, Lee WR, & McCallum RI: Hunter's Diseases of Occupations, Little, Brown & Co, Boston, MA, 1994.
    294) Reeb-Whitaker CK, Eckert CM, Anderson NJ, et al: Occupational Hydrofluoric Acid Injury from Car and Truck Washing--Washington State, 2001-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64(32):874-877.
    295) Rioufol C: C R Hebd Acad Sci Ser D 1980; 290:215-217.
    296) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    297) Rivera W, Velez LI, & Carrasco M: Hydrofluoric acid ingestion resulting in recurrent ventricular fibrillation: documented fluoride levels (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:354-355.
    298) Ryan JM, McCarthy GM, & Plunkett PK: Regional intravenous calcium, an effective method of treating hydrofluoric acid burns to limb peripheries. J Accident Emerg Med 1997; 14:401-404.
    299) Sadilova MS: Gig Sanit 1974; 12:33-36.
    300) Sadove R, Hainsworth D, & Van Meter W: Total body immersion in hydrofluoric acid. South Med J 1990; 83:698-700.
    301) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    302) Sanz-Gallen P, Nogue S, & Munne P: Hypocalcaemia and hypomagnesaemia due to hydrofluoric acid. Occup Med 2001; 51:294-295.
    303) Saxena K: Clinical features and management of poisoning due to potassium chloride. Med Toxicol Adv Drug Exp 1989; 4:429-443.
    304) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    305) Siegel DC & Heard JM: Intra-arterial calcium infusion for hydrofluoric acid burns. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992; 120:206-211.
    306) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985, pp 508-509.
    307) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    308) Smith JD, Bia MJ, & DeFronza RA: Clinical disorders of potassium metabolism. In: Arieff AI & DeFronzo RA (Eds): Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Disorders, Vol 1, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, 1985, pp 413-510.
    309) Soderberg K, Kuusinen P, Mathieu L, et al: An improved method for emergent decontamination of ocular and dermal hydrofluoric acid splashes. Vet Human Toxicol 2004; 46:216-218.
    310) Speranza V, Webb C, Gaar G, et al: Hydrofluoric acid dermal exposure resulting in fatality. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(5):682-683.
    311) Spoler F, Frentz M, Forst M, et al: Analysis of hydrofluoric acid penetration and decontamination of the eye by means of time-resolved optical coherence tomography. Burns 2008; 34(4):549-555.
    312) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    313) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    314) Stremski ES, Grande GA, & Ling LJ: Survival following hydrofluoric acid ingestion (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1991; 33:363.
    315) Stuke LE, Arnoldo BD, Hunt JL, et al: Hydrofluoric acid burns: a 15-year experience. J Burn Care Res 2008; 29(6):893-896.
    316) Su M, Chu J, Howland MA, et al: Amiodarone attenuates fluoride-induced hyperkalemia in vitro. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10(2):105-109.
    317) Takase I, Kono K, Tamura A, et al: Fatality due to acute fluoride poisoning in the workplace. Legal Med 2004; 6:197-200.
    318) Temple PJ & Weinstein LH: J Air Pollut Control Assoc 1978; 28:151-152.
    319) Temple RE & Esterhay RJ: A new univeral sorbent for hazardous spills. J Hazard Materials 1980; 4:185-190.
    320) Tepperman PB: Fatality due to acute systemic fluoride poisoning following a hydrofluoric acid skin burn. J Occup Med 1980; 22:691-692.
    321) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    322) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    323) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    324) Trevino C, Smith G, & Ryan M: Nebulized calcium gluconate for the treatment of respiratory exposure to hydrofluoric acid (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:509.
    325) Trevino MA, Herrmann GH, & Sprout WL: Treatment of severe hydrofluoric acid exposures. J Occup Med 1983a; 25:861-863.
    326) Trevino MA, Herrmann GH, & Sprout WL: Treatment of severe hydrofluoric acid exposures.. J Occup Med 1983; 25:861-863.
    327) Tsonis L, Hantsch-Bardsley C, & Gamelli RL: Hydrofluoric acid inhalation injury. J Burn Care Res 2008; 29(5):852-855.
    328) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    329) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    330) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    331) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    332) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    333) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    334) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    335) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    336) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    337) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    338) Urben PG: Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, Volume 1, 5th ed, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, England, 1995.
    339) Vance MV & Curry SC: Digital hydrofluoric acid burns: treatment with intra-arterial calcium infusion. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:890-896.
    340) Velvart J: Arterial perfusion for hydrofluoric acid burns: treatment with intra-arterial calcium infusion. Human Toxicol 1983; 2:233-238.
    341) Voroshilin SI: Tsitol Genet 1975; 9:42-44.
    342) WHO: Environ Health Criteria: Fluorine and Fluorides, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1984, pp 26.
    343) Waldbott GL & Lee JR: Toxicity from repeated low-grade exposure to hydrogen fluoride -- case report. Clin Toxicol 1978; 13:391-402.
    344) Watson AA, Oliver JS, & Thorpe JW: Accidental death due to inhalation of hydrofluoric acid. Med Sci Law 1973; 13:277-279.
    345) Weast RC: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 69th ed, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, FL, 1988, pp B-94-F-67.
    346) Webster RW: Legal Medicine and Toxicology, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1930, pp 389.
    347) Wedler V, Guggenheim M, Moron M, et al: Extensive hydrofluoric acid injuries: a serious problem. J Trauma 2005; 58:852-857.
    348) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    349) Wetherhold JM & Shepherd FP: Treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. J Occup Med 1965; 7:193-195.
    350) White DA: Hydrofluoric acid -- a chronic poisoning effect. J Soc Occup Med 1980; 30:12-14.
    351) Williams J, Hammad A, & Cottington EC: Intravenous magnesium in the treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns in rats. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23:464-469.
    352) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    353) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    354) Wing JS, Brender JD, & Sanderson LM: Acute health effects in a community after a release of hydrofluoric acid. Arch Environ Health 1991; 46:155-160.
    355) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    356) Wormser U, Sintov A, Brodsky B, et al: Protective effect of topical iodine preparations upon heat-induced and hydrofluoric acid-induced skin lesions. Toxicol Pathol 2002; 30(5):552-558.
    357) Wu ML, Deng JF, & Fan JS: Survival after hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia and cardiac arrest following mild hydrofluoric acid burn. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2010; 48(9):953-955.
    358) Wu ML, Yang CC, Ger J, et al: Acute hydrofluoric acid exposure reported to Taiwan Poison Control Center, 1991-2010. Hum Exp Toxicol 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    359) Yamashita M, Yamashita M, & Suzuki M: Iontophoretic delivery of calcium for experimental hydrofluoric acid burns. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1575-1578.
    360) Yamaura K, Kao B, & Iimori E: Recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with QT prolongation following hydrofluoric acid burns. Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:311-313.
    361) Yu-Jang S, Li-Hua L, & Wai-Mau C: Survival after a massive hydrofluoric acid ingestion with ECG changes (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:458-460.
    362) Zachary LS, Reus W, & Gottlieb J: Treatment of experimental hydrofluoric acid burns. J Burn Care 1986; 7:35-39.
    363) Zenz C: Occupational Medicine, 3rd ed, Mosby - Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, MO, 1994.
    364) Zierold D & Chauviere M: Hydrogen fluoride inhalation injury because of a fire suppression system. Mil Med 2012; 177(1):108-112.