1) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness in unintubated patients; following ingestion of corrosives; hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential); patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation; and trivial or non-toxic ingestion.

1) Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures recur after diazepam 30 mg (adults) or 10 mg (children greater than 5 years).
2) Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.

1) Consider phenobarbital or propofol if seizures recur after diazepam 30 mg (adults) or 10 mg (children greater than 5 years).
2) Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.

1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
2) HUMAN EXPOSURES - No serious human exposures have yet been reported. Extrapolation of animal data would indicate primary treatment should be respiratory support during periods of anesthesia.
3) HYPOTENSION: Infuse 10 to 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine (5 to 20 mcg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (ADULT: begin infusion at 0.5 to 1 mcg/min; CHILD: begin infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min); titrate to desired response.
4) ACUTE LUNG INJURY: Maintain ventilation and oxygenation and evaluate with frequent arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry monitoring. Early use of PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be needed.
5) SEIZURES: Administer a benzodiazepine; DIAZEPAM (ADULT: 5 to 10 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 20 minutes as needed. CHILD: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed) or LORAZEPAM (ADULT: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist. CHILD: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue).
6) NOTE - See treatment of dermal exposure in the main body of this document for complete information.

1) Hypotension is a potential adverse effect of overexposure (HSDB , 1997).

1) Tachypnea is a symptom of furan intoxication in animals (HSDB , 1997).

1) Inhalation of furan vapors produced pulmonary edema in mice (RTECS , 1997).

1) Severe bronchiolar necrosis occurred in mice following an intraperitoneal dose of furan (HSDB , 1997).

1) Furan may produce dizziness (EPA, 1985; Sittig, 1991). Inhalation of the vapors produces narcosis (Budavari, 1996). Death is usually from respiratory arrest (HSDB , 1997).
2) Typical signs of CNS depression include headache, nausea and vomiting, vertigo, weakness, sleepiness, loss of coordination and judgement, coma, and death.

1) Tonic seizures have occurred in experimental animals (HSDB , 1997).

1) Gastrointestinal congestion and hemorrhage, with partial destruction of the mucosa, occurred from oral administration in experimental animals (RTECS , 1997; HSDB , 1997).

1) Massive coagulation necrosis of the centrilobular parenchymal cells was seen in mice 24 hours after a single IP injection of 0.2 mg/kg (HSDB , 1997).
2) Furan was found to be hepatotoxic in rats and mice (RTECS , 1997).
3) Hepatic injury appears to require cytochrome p-450 activation and is associated with depletion of GSH (Carfagna et al, 1993).

1) The kidneys were soft and swollen after oral administration of furan to animals (HSDB , 1997). Severe coagulation necrosis of tubular cells of the renal cortex was seen in mice 24 hours after a single IP injection of 0.2 mg/kg (HSDB , 1997).
2) The nephrotoxic effects of furan in mice were prevented by diethyldithiocarbamate or carbon disulfide (Masuda et al, 1984).

1) Furan was a sensitizer when applied dermally to guinea pigs in 1 to 50% solutions (HSDB , 1997).

1) Furan is irritating to the skin (Sittig, 1991).

1) Burns to the skin may occur (Sittig, 1991).

1) Increase in muscle tone and tonic seizures has occurred in experimental animals (HSDB , 1997).

1) Furan was a sensitizer when applied dermally to guinea pigs in 1 to 50% solutions (HSDB , 1997).

1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the teratogenic potential of this agent.

1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during pregnancy or lactation.

1) IARC Classification

1) CARCINOMA

1) Two-year gavage studies by the National Toxicology Program have found clear evidence of furan carcinogenicity in male and female rats and mice (NTP , 1993). Hepatocellular neoplasms of the liver occurred in both rats and mice. Cholangiocarcinoma and mononuclear cell leukemia occurred in rats only, and benign pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland occurred only in mice.
2) In a 2-year F-344 rat study, furan at 2 to 8 mg/kg/d induced a high frequency (86-100 percent) of cholangiocarcinomas, some of which demonstrated metastasis, transplantablility, and/or ability to be propagated in vitro (Maronpot et al, 1991).
3) Cholangiocarcinomas induced by furan in rats display morphologic features characteristic of intestinal epithelium (Sirica, 1996).
4) Furan is carcinogenic in rats and mice by RTECS criteria (RTECS , 1997).

1) A number of chemicals produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system, liver, and kidneys. Monitoring complete blood count and liver and kidney function tests is suggested for patients with significant exposure.

1) A number of chemicals produce abnormalities of the hematopoietic system, liver, and kidneys. Monitoring urinalysis is suggested for patients with significant exposure.

1) MONITORING

1) DO NOT INDUCE EMESIS - because of the risk of aspiration pneumonitis and rapid onset of narcosis with this agent.

1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
2) CHARCOAL DOSE

1) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
2) PRECAUTIONS:
3) LAVAGE FLUID:
4) COMPLICATIONS:
5) CONTRAINDICATIONS:

1) HUMAN EXPOSURES - No serious human exposures have yet been reported. Extrapolation of animal data would indicate primary treatment should be respiratory support during periods of anesthesia.

1) SUMMARY
2) DOPAMINE
3) NOREPINEPHRINE

1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).

1) SUMMARY
2) DIAZEPAM
3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
4) LORAZEPAM
5) PHENOBARBITAL
6) OTHER AGENTS

1) There is little information regarding the use of endoscopy, corticosteroids or surgery in the setting of concentrated furan ingestion. The following information is derived from experience with other corrosives.
2) SUMMARY: Obtain consultation concerning endoscopy as soon as possible, and perform endoscopy within the first 24 hours when indicated.
3) INDICATIONS: Endoscopy should be performed in adults with a history of deliberate ingestion, adults with any signs or symptoms attributable to inadvertent ingestion, and in children with stridor, vomiting, or drooling after unintentional ingestion (Crain et al, 1984). Endoscopy should also be performed in children with dysphagia or refusal to swallow, significant oral burns, or abdominal pain after unintentional ingestion (Gaudreault et al, 1983; Nuutinen et al, 1994). Children and adults who are asymptomatic after accidental ingestion do not require endoscopy (Gupta et al, 2001; Lamireau et al, 2001; Gorman et al, 1992).
4) RISKS: Numerous large case series attest to the relative safety and utility of early endoscopy in the management of caustic ingestion.
5) The risk of perforation during endoscopy is minimized by (Zargar et al, 1991):
6) GRADING
7) FOLLOW UP - If burns are found, follow 10 to 20 days later with barium swallow or esophagram.
8) SCINTIGRAPHY - Scans utilizing radioisotope labelled sucralfate (technetium 99m) were performed in 22 patients with caustic ingestion and compared with endoscopy for the detection of esophageal burns. Two patients had minimal residual isotope activity on scanning but normal endoscopy and two patients had normal activity on scan but very mild erythema on endoscopy. Overall the radiolabeled sucralfate scan had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 84% and negative predictive value of 100% for detecting clinically significant burns in this population (Millar et al, 2001). This may represent an alternative to endoscopy, particularly in young children, as no sedation is required for this procedure. Further study is required.
9) MINIPROBE ULTRASONOGRAPHY - was performed in 11 patients with corrosive ingestion . Findings were categorized as grade 0 (distinct muscular layers without thickening, grade I (distinct muscular layers with thickening), grade II (obscured muscular layers with indistinct margins) and grade III (muscular layers that could not be differentiated). Findings were further categorized as to whether the worst appearing image involved part of the circumference (type a) or the whole circumference (type b). Strictures did not develop in patients with grade 0 (5 patients) or grade I (4 patients) lesions. Transient stricture formation developed in the only patient with grade IIa lesions, and stricture requiring repeated dilatation developed in the only patient with grade IIIb lesions (Kamijo et al, 2004).

1) CORROSIVE INGESTION/SUMMARY: The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of caustic ingestion is controversial. Most animal studies have involved alkali-induced injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973). Most human studies have been retrospective and generally involve more alkali than acid-induced injury and small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury.
2) FIRST DEGREE BURNS: These burns generally heal well and rarely result in stricture formation (Zargar et al, 1989; Howell et al, 1992). Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in these patients (Howell et al, 1992).
3) SECOND DEGREE BURNS: Some authors recommend corticosteroid treatment to prevent stricture formation in patients with a second degree, deep-partial thickness burn (Howell et al, 1992). However, no well controlled human study has documented efficacy. Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in patients with a second degree, superficial-partial thickness burn (Caravati, 2004; Howell et al, 1992).
4) THIRD DEGREE BURNS: Some authors have recommended steroids in this group as well (Howell et al, 1992). A high percentage of patients with third degree burns go on to develop strictures with or without corticosteroid therapy and the risk of infection and perforation may be increased by corticosteroid use. Most authors feel that the risk outweighs any potential benefit and routine use is not recommended (Boukthir et al, 2004; Oakes et al, 1982; Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Include active gastrointestinal bleeding and evidence of gastric or esophageal perforation. Corticosteroids are thought to be ineffective if initiated more than 48 hours after a burn (Howell, 1987).
6) DOSE: Administer daily oral doses of 0.1 milligram/kilogram of dexamethasone or 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram of prednisone. Continue therapy for a total of 3 weeks and then taper (Haller et al, 1971; Marshall, 1979). An alternative regimen in children is intravenous prednisolone 2 milligrams/kilogram/day followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks then tapered (Anderson et al, 1990).
7) ANTIBIOTICS: Animal studies suggest that the addition of antibiotics can prevent the infectious complications associated with corticosteroid use in the setting of caustic burns. Antibiotics are recommended if corticosteroids are used or if perforation or infection is suspected. Agents that cover anaerobes and oral flora such as penicillin, ampicillin, or clindamycin are appropriate (Rosenberg et al, 1953).
8) STUDIES

1) SUMMARY: Initially if severe esophageal burns are found a string may be placed in the stomach to facilitate later dilation. Insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube after confirmation of a circumferential burn may prevent strictures. Dilation is indicated after 2 to 4 weeks if strictures are confirmed. If dilation is unsuccessful colonic intraposition or gastric tube placement may be needed. Early laparotomy should be considered in patients with evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns on endoscopy.
2) STRING - If a second degree or circumferential burn of the esophagus is found a string may be placed in the stomach to avoid false channel and to provide a guide for later dilation procedures (Gandhi et al, 1989).
3) STENT - The insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube or stent immediately after endoscopically proven deep circumferential burns is preferred by some surgeons to prevent stricture formation (Mills et al, 1978; (Wijburg et al, 1985; Coln & Chang, 1986).
4) DILATION - Dilation should be performed at 1 to 4 week intervals when stricture is present(Gundogdu et al, 1992). Repeated dilation may be required over many months to years in some patients. Successful dilation of gastric antral strictures has also been reported (Hogan & Polter, 1986; Treem et al, 1987).
5) COLONIC REPLACEMENT - Intraposition of colon may be necessary if dilation fails to provide an adequate sized esophagus (Chiene et al, 1974; Little et al, 1988; Huy & Celerier, 1988).
6) LAPAROTOMY/LAPAROSCOPY - Several authors advocate laparotomy or laparoscopy in patients with endoscopic evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns to evaluate for the presence of transmural gastric or esophageal necrosis (Cattan et al, 2000; Estrera et al, 1986; Meredith et al, 1988; Wu & Lai, 1993).

1) HUMAN EXPOSURES - No serious human exposures have yet been reported. Extrapolation of animal data would indicate primary treatment should be respiratory support during periods of anesthesia.

1) SUMMARY
2) DOPAMINE
3) NOREPINEPHRINE

1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).

1) SUMMARY
2) DIAZEPAM
3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
4) LORAZEPAM
5) PHENOBARBITAL
6) OTHER AGENTS

1) Carefully observe patients with eye exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.

1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

1) HUMAN EXPOSURES - No serious human exposures have yet been reported. Extrapolation of animal data would indicate primary treatment should be respiratory support during periods of anesthesia.

1) SUMMARY
2) DOPAMINE
3) NOREPINEPHRINE

1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).

1) SUMMARY
2) DIAZEPAM
3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
4) LORAZEPAM
5) PHENOBARBITAL
6) OTHER AGENTS

a) 2B : The agent (mixture) is possibly carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are possibly carcinogenic to humans. This category is used for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some instances, an agent, mixture or exposure circumstance for which there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but limited evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals together with supporting evidence from other relevant data may be placed in this group.

a) R : RAHC = Reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen

1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
2) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT: