MOBILE VIEW  | 

FENTANYL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain and for analgesic therapy during anesthetic periods. It is subject to diversion and abuse.

Specific Substances

    1) Acetyl fentanyl (synonym)
    2) Acetanilide (synonym)
    3) McN-JR-4263-49
    4) Phentanyl Citrate
    5) Fentanyl citrate
    6) Fentanyl hydrochloride
    7) N-Phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] acetamide N-(1-Phenethyl)-4-piperidylacetanilide
    8) R-4263
    9) CAS 003258-84-2 (acetyl fentanyl)
    10) CAS 437-38-7 (fentanyl)
    11) CAS 990-73-8 (fentanyl citrate)
    12) CAS 1443-54-5 (fentanyl hydrochloride)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) ACETYL FENTANYL: C21H26N2O
    2) FENTANYL: C22H28N2O
    3) FENTANYL CITRATE: C22H28N2O.C6H8O7
    4) FENTANYL HYDROCHLORIDE: C22H28N2O.HCl

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) FORMULATIONS
    a) Fentanyl is available as:
    1) LOZENGES ("Lollipop"): Available in 6 dosage strengths: 200 mcg, 400 mcg, 600 mcg, 800 mcg, 1200 mcg and 1600 mcg. Each lozenge is individually wrapped in a child-resistant package with the dosage strength marked on each handle (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    2) ORAL BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM: Available in 6 dosage strengths: 200 mcg, 400 mcg, 600 mcg, 800 mcg and 1200 mcg (Prod Info ONSOLIS(TM) buccal, soluble film, 2009).
    3) PARENTERAL: 0.05 mg/mL or 50 mcg/mL in various single-dose vials of 2 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL, 20 mL and 50 mL (Prod Info fentanyl citrate injection, 2005).
    4) TRANSDERMAL PATCH: Available in 5 dosage strengths (fentanyl content per transdermal system): 2.1 mg (12 mcg/hr), 4.2 mg (25 mcg/hr), 8.4 mg (50 mcg/hr), 12.6 mg (75 mcg/hr) and 16.8 mg (100 mcg/hr) (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    5) SUBLINGUAL TABLETS: Available in tablet strengths of 100 mcg, 200 mcg, 300 mcg, 400 mcg, 600 mcg, and 800 mcg (Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011).
    6) SUBLINGUAL SPRAY: Available in single spray unit strengths of 100 mcg, 200 mcg, 400 mcg, 600 mcg, and 800 mcg (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2012).
    b) FENTANYL LOZENGE: Actiq(R), an oral transmucosal form of fentanyl, in the form of a flavored sugar lozenge that dissolves in the mouth while held by an attached handle, is designed for slow dissolution. It is approved for breakthrough cancer pain, and is more powerful than morphine. Due to its potency and potential fatal effects in children inadvertently exposed to this drug, the FDA has approved this drug with special regulations restricting its distribution ((Anon, 1998)).
    c) METHODS OF ABUSE/MISUSE
    1) FENTANYL PATCH
    a) SUMMARY: The increasing use of fentanyl patches for pain control has resulted in more cases of fentanyl misuse and diversion (Firestone et al, 2009; Sutlovic & Definis-Gojanovic, 2007; Flannagan et al, 1996).
    b) INGESTION: Numerous reports of fatal opioid intoxication have occurred following the intentional ingestion (ie, chewing or sucking on the content of patches) of fentanyl patches by adults (Woodall et al, 2008; Kramer & Tawney, 1998; Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994).
    1) Acute opioid poisoning occurred when a fentanyl patch was placed into a cup of hot water, allowed to steep for several minutes, with the liquid subsequently consumed (Barrueto et al, 2004).
    2) According to analysis of data from the Researched, Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance System (RADARS) Poison Center Program from 2012 through 2014, 55.7% of 2,522 intentional exposures (ie, suspected suicide, misuse, abuse, and unknown intentional) to fentanyl patches resulted from a non-dermal route (eg, swallowed whole, crushed/chewed, inhaled, injected, transmucosal), with crushed/chewed being the most common non-dermal route, occurring in greater than 50% of cases involving intentional exposures to fentanyl patches (Nickless et al, 2015).
    c) INADVERTENT INGESTION: There have been reports of acute poisoning in toddlers and young children following the inadvertent ingestion of transdermal fentanyl patches. Fatalities have occurred (Teske et al, 2007; Sachdeva & Stadnyk, 2005).
    d) INTRAVENOUS: Two adults developed opioid poisoning following the intravenous injection of the contents of a 5 mg transdermal fentanyl patch. One patient recovered at the scene after 1.2 mg naloxone, and the other patient died the following day after the withdrawal of care after developing hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure (Reeves & Ginifer, 2002). In another case series, 4 individuals died after intravenous exposure to fentanyl following extraction from a transdermal patch. All of the deaths were attributed to fentanyl toxicity (Tharp et al, 2004).
    e) INHALATION: A man was observed emptying the contents of a fentanyl patch onto aluminum foil and heating the contents; he collapsed after taking one inhalation. Paramedics gave naloxone in the field and the patient was alert and oriented with 30 minutes. He was discharged with no residual effects (Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994).
    f) RECTAL: Opioid intoxication occurred in an adult after placing 3 fentanyl (100 mcg/hour) patches into his rectum. The patient recovered completely once the patches were removed (Coon et al, 2005).
    g) DIVERTED PRESCRIPTION PRODUCT: A fatal fentanyl overdose occurred in an adult employed at a funeral center after removing a fentanyl patch from the body of an elderly woman. Postmortem blood concentrations were positive for fentanyl only; the toxicology screen was negative for other drugs of abuse (Flannagan et al, 1996).
    2) REFORMULATION OF FENTANYL TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    a) Transdermal fentanyl has been available by prescription since 1990. In 2005, the manufacturers reformulated the transdermal system so that the active drug was contained in a polymer matrix rather than a gel filled reservoir. This resulted in a thinner and smaller patch to minimize adverse events and intentional diversion of the product. However, one study suggested that the drug could easily be extracted from the revised patch by adding vinegar and water, and then soaking, heating or microwaving the patch and collecting the liquid. The extracted liquid could then be placed in a syringe for injection, which might be shared by several individuals. The findings suggest that reformulation had limited effect on preventing illicit drug use (Firestone et al, 2009).
    3) INTRAVENOUS
    a) PHARMACEUTICAL: Intentional misuse of pharmaceutical fentanyl has been well recognized among health professionals including physicians, anesthesiologists, nurses and pharmacists (Firestone et al, 2009; Sutlovic & Definis-Gojanovic, 2007). It has also been misused by individuals with a history of heroin use (Henderson, 1991).
    4) ILLICIT FENTANYL ANALOGS
    a) Clandestine laboratories have synthesized alpha-methylfentanyl and distributed it as a heroin substitute referred to as "China White". Numerous other illicit fentanyl analogs have also been identified. Deaths have been related to overdose of these products. It has been suggested that the most toxic of these agents is 3-methylfentanyl, which has a potency of 6000 times that of morphine. Although studies in humans have not been conducted, it appears that these analogs have similar pharmacologic action as fentanyl (Poklis, 1995).
    b) ACETYL FENTANYL: Between March and May 2013, Rhode Island public health officials and the Centers for Disease Control identified 14 acetyl fentanyl-related deaths. Acetyl fentanyl, a synthetic opioid, is an illicit agent. Based on animal studies, it is up to 5 times more potent than heroin. One death was attributed to acetyl fentanyl alone (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2013a).
    B) SOURCES
    1) FENTANYL-LACED STREET DRUGS
    a) There have been several outbreaks of fentanyl-related deaths due to fentanyl-laced heroin and cocaine sold for illicit use. In Chicago from April 2005 through December 2006, hundreds of individuals died from a lethal injection of fentanyl-laced heroin that was distributed by drug dealers for free to attract new clients. Street names for these products included: "Drop Dead," "Flat Line," "Reaper," and "Lethal Injection" (Schumann et al, 2008; Boddiger, 2006). Similar cases were reported in other states (eg, New Jersey, Maryland, Michigan and Pennsylvania) throughout the US in 2006 and 2007. Like the outbreak in Chicago, most of the cases were due to nonpharmaceutical fentanyl mixed with heroin or cocaine and sold illicitly for injection (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008).
    b) In Wayne county Michigan between July 2005 and May 2006, the presence of fentanyl was confirmed in more than 100 fatalities compared with an average 15 to 20 fentanyl-associated fatalities in previous years (Algren et al, 2013). However, following the closure of a facility manufacturing illegal nonpharmaceutical fentanyl (NPF) in Toluca, Mexico in May of 2006 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008), NPF-related fatalities dropped from a high of 150/month to zero in June of 2006 (Algren et al, 2013).
    c) In New Mexico, between the years 1986 and 2007, 96 fatalities from fentanyl-associated overdose were identified. Among these cases, 27 (28%) were identified as fentanyl only overdoses. However, only one case had no drugs, other than fentanyl, detected at the time of death. Among the fentanyl-related deaths, the route of administration was by transdermal fentanyl patch in 60% of the cases. In 4 cases (4%), a patch was ingested and in 5% of the cases the route was IV. The route of administration was unknown in 30% of the cases (Krinsky et al, 2011).
    C) USES
    1) Fentanyl is an opioid analgesic used for the management of persistent, moderate to severe pain (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009). It has a high potency (approximately 80 to 100 times more potent than morphine) with a short duration of action (Perrone & DeRoos, 2007; Poklis, 1995). Oral formulations (ie, buccal soluble, transmucosal lozenge), sublingual tablets or spray, and the transdermal system are indicated for the management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer who are opioid-tolerant (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2012; Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009; Prod Info ONSOLIS(TM) buccal, soluble film, 2009).
    2) Fentanyl citrate injection is indicated for analgesic therapy during anesthetic periods (ie, premedication, induction and maintenance) and in the immediate postoperative period. It may be combined with a neuroleptic (ie, droperidol) for the induction of anesthesia or the maintenance of general or regional anesthesia (Prod Info fentanyl citrate injection, 2005).
    3) The various formulations have all been subject to diversion and abuse (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2012; Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Fentanyl is used for the treatment of persistent moderate to severe chronic pain (eg, cancer pain) in opioid tolerant individuals. It may also be used for anesthesia and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient in the intensive care unit. It is available via the following routes: parenteral, transmucosal (transmucosal lozenge, buccal soluble film), transdermal, and sublingual (spray and tablet). It has been abused, similar to other opioids.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Fentanyl is a pure opioid agonist of high potency (80 to 100 times more potent than morphine) with a short duration of action. It is known to be a mu-opioid receptor agonist that can produce respiratory depression. Fentanyl exerts its primary pharmacologic effects on the central nervous system (ie, depresses the respiratory centers, depresses the cough reflex, and constricts the pupils).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: There have been several outbreaks of fentanyl toxicity where it was injected as a street drug of abuse. In general, pharmaceutical fentanyl exposures are less common as compared to other opiates; however, deaths have been reported in both opioid tolerant and non-tolerant individuals following intentional and unintentional misuse of fentanyl (eg, transdermal). Acetyl fentanyl is an injectable fentanyl analog that has been used illicitly.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: PARENTERAL: Respiratory depression, apnea, rigidity, and bradycardia may occur with parenteral administration. Other adverse reactions include: hypertension, hypotension, dizziness, blurred vision, nausea, emesis, laryngospasm and diaphoresis. TRANSDERMAL: Titration phase: Nausea, dizziness, somnolence, vomiting, asthenia and headache may occur. Maintenance: Dyspnea, constipation, anxiety, confusion, depression, rash and insomnia may develop. BUCCAL FILM: Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dehydration, dyspnea and somnolence may be observed. As with other opiates, tolerance and physical dependence can develop with regular use of fentanyl.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, headache, anxiety, dizziness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea or respiratory arrest, hypoxia, circulatory depression, hypotension and shock. Death may result from any of these complications.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypoventilation is likely following a significant overdose. Bradycardia may develop.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Fentanyl is classified by the manufacturer as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of fentanyl use during pregnancy. Fentanyl is known to cross the placental barrier. Prolonged use of fentanyl during pregnancy can cause neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Symptoms of withdrawal include irritability, sleep disturbances, hyperactivity, tremor, vomiting, diarrhea, and failure to gain weight. This condition may become life-threatening without early recognition and treatment, and varies in terms of onset, duration, and severity based on the duration of use, rate of elimination of the drug in the newborn, maternal dose, and timing of last maternal use. If prolonged use of opioids during pregnancy is required, the patient should be advised of the risk of infant withdrawal syndrome. Teratogenic effects have not been clearly associated with use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy; however use during pregnancy and/or labor has been associated with growth retardation, respiratory depression, fetal physical dependence and withdrawal. Fentanyl should not be used during labor and/or delivery as this may result in respiratory depression in the fetus or infant. It is recommended that fentanyl be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk to the fetus.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential in humans. In animal studies, no increased risk in tumors was found with fentanyl use.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor carefully for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Urine toxicology screens for opioids often do not detect synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. Plasma concentrations are available from specialty labs. They are not available rapidly and are not useful for guiding therapy, but may confirm exposure.
    D) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to exclude other causes or if the diagnosis of fentanyl toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Evaluate for pulmonary and central nervous system manifestation of toxicity or sequelae from toxicity.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients may only need observation.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Naloxone is the antidote indicated for severe toxicity (respiratory or CNS depression). Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Fentanyl is absorbed rapidly, GI decontamination is unlikely to be of benefit and may cause aspiration; it should be avoided. Search for and remove any fentanyl patches on the patient's body.
    2) HOSPITAL: Fentanyl is absorbed rapidly, GI decontamination is unlikely to be of benefit and may cause aspiration; it should be avoided. Search for and remove any fentanyl patches on the patient's body (including rectum and vagina).
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) NALOXONE, an opioid antagonist, is the specific antidote. Naloxone can be given intravascularly, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intranasally or endotracheally. The usual dose is 0.4 to 2.0 mg IV. In patients with suspected opioid dependence incremental doses of 0.2 mg IV should be administered, titrated to reversal of respiratory depression and coma, to avoid precipitating acute opioid withdrawal. Doses may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes up to 20 mg. Very high doses are rarely needed, but may be necessary in overdoses of high potency opioids, such as fentanyl.
    2) A CONTINUOUS infusion may be necessary in opioid naive patients who have swallowed a sustained release formulations such as a fentanyl patch. A suggested starting rate is two-thirds of the dose effective for initial reversal that is administered each hour; titrate as needed. Naloxone can precipitate withdrawal in an opioid-dependent patients, which is usually not life-threatening; however it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient.
    F) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia or due to properties of certain agents or their metabolites (e.g., meperidine, tramadol, propoxyphene). Treatment includes ensuring adequate oxygenation, and administering intravenous benzodiazepines; propofol or barbiturates may be indicated, if seizures persist.
    G) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Acute lung injury can develop in a small proportion of patients after an acute opioid overdose, and has been reported in a number of patients following intravenous overdose of fentanyl. The pathophysiology is unclear. Patients should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after overdose to evaluate for hypoxia and/or the development of acute lung injury. Continuous oxygen therapy, pulse oximetry, PEEP and mechanical ventilation may be necessary.
    H) HYPOTENSION
    1) Hypotension is often reversed by naloxone. Initially, treat with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    I) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis and hemoperfusion are not of value because of the large volume of distribution of fentanyl.
    J) INTRATHECAL INJECTION
    1) Limited experience. Treat seizures (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, propofol) and support blood pressure with fluids and pressors as needed. Naloxone infusion may be useful. Intubate and ventilate as needed. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage may accelerate recovery.
    K) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended (therapeutic) dose, especially if opioid naive.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate exposures and all children with exposures should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4 hours, as peak plasma concentration and symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Opioid-naive patients who have been exposed to a transdermal patch (even after patch removal) have the potential to manifest symptoms in a delayed fashion and should be observed for 8 hours, and admitted if symptoms persist. If the exposure was intravenous, the patient should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last naloxone dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury. Asymptomatic children under 6 years of age should be observed in the Emergency Department for at least 8 hours following application of a transdermal fentanyl patch once patch is removed and the skin washed, as systemic absorption from the dermal depot continues after patch removal.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with significant persistent central nervous depression should be admitted to the hospital. Patients needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as he/she may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, or delirium or those needing a naloxone infusion or intubated patients should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Any patient who ingests or inserts rectally or vaginally a patch should be admitted as absorption is unpredictable, and rectal, vaginal or transdermal patches should be removed.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    L) PITFALLS
    1) Patients may be discharged prematurely after mental status clears with a dose of naloxone. Naloxone's duration of effect may be much shorter than the duration of effect for many opioids. Serum concentrations gradually decline over 20 to 27 hours following transdermal fentanyl removal; patients will need to be observed and treated for at least 8 hours after the patch is removed and skin is washed. All patients with a suspected fentanyl overdose should be inspected for any remaining patches because the drug will constantly be delivered until the patch is removed. Search for patches in concealed locations (rectum, vagina). Other causes of altered mental status must be excluded.
    M) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Fentanyl is absorbed via many routes, most commonly via oral or transdermal for pain control. Oral absorption is rapid (buccal soluble film or transmucosal lozenge); 20 to 40 minutes to maximum plasma concentration with oral formulations. With normal use, transdermal absorption is gradual and levels off over 12 to 24 hours. However, intentional misuse of fentanyl patches (transmucosal application and intravenous injection) have resulted in rapid development of high serum concentrations. Abusers have injected, inhaled and ingested the content of transdermal patches. In addition, intentional application of heat to transdermal patches has resulted in rapid absorption. Onset of action is rapid following intravenous administration. Plasma protein binding is 80% to 85%. Average volume of distribution is 6 L/kg (range: 3 to 8 L/kg) for intravenous fentanyl; 4 L/kg for oral formulations. Hepatic metabolism for intravenous and oral formulations, while the skin does not appear to metabolize transdermal fentanyl. Terminal half-life is 14 hours for buccal film; 7 hours for transmucosal lozenge; 3.65 hours for intravenous; and serum concentrations gradually decline over 20 to 27 hours following the removal of a transdermal patch.
    N) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Overdose with other sedating agents (eg, ethanol, benzodiazepine/barbiturate, antipsychotics); overdose with central alpha 2 agonists (eg, clonidine, tizanidine, imidazoline decongestants); CNS infection; intracranial hemorrhage; hypoglycemia or hypoxia.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Inhalation of fentanyl may result from intentional heating and "snorting" of the contents of a fentanyl transdermal patch. Refer to ORAL exposure for further treatment guidelines.
    0.4.6) PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) INTRATHECAL INJECTION: Limited experience. Treat seizures (i.e., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, propofol) and support blood pressure with fluids and pressors as needed. Naloxone infusion may be useful. Intubate and ventilate as needed. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage may accelerate recovery. Refer to ORAL exposure for further treatment guidelines.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: ADULT: INTRAVENOUS: Intentional misuse of intravenous fentanyl can result in rapid death due to respiratory depression. If a product designed for slow release (eg transdermal patch) is abused in a manner that allows rapid release of the entire dose (eg smoked, chewed, swallowed inserted rectally or vaginally, injected, insufflated), severe, potentially fatal toxicity is expected. TRANSDERMAL: Fentanyl transdermal patches have been intentionally misused via inhalation, ingestion and intravenous exposure. Deaths have been reported. An adult died after cutting apart a 7.5 mg fentanyl transdermal patch and ingesting the contents. In another case, typical opioid toxicity occurred in an adult who intentionally inserted several fentanyl patches rectally; recovery was uneventful following removal. PEDIATRIC: A 15-year-old girl survived respiratory depression and coma after applying 5 transdermal 100 mcg/hour fentanyl patches to her body that were left in place for 12 hours. SUBLINGUAL SPRAY: Sublingual spray fentanyl is not bioequivalent with other forms of fentanyl. PEDIATRIC: A 12-month-old (11 kg) died after ingesting a transdermal fentanyl patch 25 mcg/hr (4.2 mg).
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: FENTANYL CITRATE INJECTION: Adjunct to general anesthesia, doses may vary from 2 mcg/kg (minor surgical procedure) up to 20 to 50 mcg/kg (major surgical procedure). Adjunctive for Regional Anesthesia: 50 to 100 mcg IM or IV slowly over 1 to 2 minutes. Premedication: 50 to 100 mcg IM 30 to 60 minutes prior to surgery. BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM: Initial dose: 200 mcg for the management of pain in patients who are already opioid tolerant. Titrate dose using 200 mcg film increments up to a maximum of four 200 mcg films or a single 1200 mcg film. ORAL TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE: Initial dose: 200 mcg/unit. The maximum dose for any breakthrough pain episode is 2 doses. Patients should wait at least 4 hrs before treating another episode of breakthrough pain. TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM: In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24 hrs morphine requirement; replace patch every 72 hrs. PEDIATRIC: FENTANYL CITRATE INJECTION: Children 2 to 12 years of age: Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia: A reduced dose as low as 2 to 3 mcg/kg is recommended. BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM: Safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age. TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE: Safety and efficacy have not been determined in children 16 years of age and less. TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM: Children 2 years and older: In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24 hr morphine requirement; replace patch every 72 hrs.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Fentanyl is used for the treatment of persistent moderate to severe chronic pain (eg, cancer pain) in opioid tolerant individuals. It may also be used for anesthesia and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient in the intensive care unit. It is available via the following routes: parenteral, transmucosal (transmucosal lozenge, buccal soluble film), transdermal, and sublingual (spray and tablet). It has been abused, similar to other opioids.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Fentanyl is a pure opioid agonist of high potency (80 to 100 times more potent than morphine) with a short duration of action. It is known to be a mu-opioid receptor agonist that can produce respiratory depression. Fentanyl exerts its primary pharmacologic effects on the central nervous system (ie, depresses the respiratory centers, depresses the cough reflex, and constricts the pupils).
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation, and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: There have been several outbreaks of fentanyl toxicity where it was injected as a street drug of abuse. In general, pharmaceutical fentanyl exposures are less common as compared to other opiates; however, deaths have been reported in both opioid tolerant and non-tolerant individuals following intentional and unintentional misuse of fentanyl (eg, transdermal). Acetyl fentanyl is an injectable fentanyl analog that has been used illicitly.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: PARENTERAL: Respiratory depression, apnea, rigidity, and bradycardia may occur with parenteral administration. Other adverse reactions include: hypertension, hypotension, dizziness, blurred vision, nausea, emesis, laryngospasm and diaphoresis. TRANSDERMAL: Titration phase: Nausea, dizziness, somnolence, vomiting, asthenia and headache may occur. Maintenance: Dyspnea, constipation, anxiety, confusion, depression, rash and insomnia may develop. BUCCAL FILM: Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dehydration, dyspnea and somnolence may be observed. As with other opiates, tolerance and physical dependence can develop with regular use of fentanyl.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Euphoria, drowsiness, headache, anxiety, dizziness, constipation, nausea, vomiting and pinpoint pupils.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: Respiratory depression leading to apnea or respiratory arrest, hypoxia, circulatory depression, hypotension and shock. Death may result from any of these complications.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypoventilation is likely following a significant overdose. Bradycardia may develop.
    3.3.2) RESPIRATIONS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Significant hypoventilation leading to life-threatening respiratory depression can develop following a fentanyl overdose (Kramer & Tawney, 1998; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) A fever may inadvertently lead to fentanyl toxicity in individuals using a fentanyl transdermal patch. Pharmacokinetic models suggest that blood fentanyl concentrations may increase by up to 30% at a body temperature of 40 degrees Celsius (None Listed, 2010).
    B) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Hypothermia was reported in 3 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=2) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=1) intoxications, and hyperthermia was reported in 2 patients with acetylfentanyl intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Bradycardia may develop in overdose (Russell, 1994).
    2) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 4 patients (5.2%) developed bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beats per minute) (Mrvos et al, 2011).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MIOSIS
    a) After overdose, pupils are typically pinpoint. Fentanyl can cause miosis even in total darkness (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    b) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Miosis was reported in 8 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=5) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension may develop with severe overdose (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    b) EPIDURAL: Severe hypotension was reported in a 72-year-old woman given an unintentional overdose of epidural fentanyl (Russell, 1994). A 56-year-old woman developed an unrecordable blood pressure and asystole following an unintentional overdose of epidural fentanyl on postoperative day 3. She recovered without sequelae following resuscitation efforts (Dawson, 1995).
    c) TRANSDERMAL PATCH: CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 4 patients (5.2%) developed hypotension (systolic less than 90 mmHg) (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    d) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less) was reported in 3 patients with acetylfentanyl intoxication (Helander et al, 2016).
    B) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 2 patients (2.6%) developed cardiac arrest (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    C) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Bradycardia has been observed infrequently with therapeutic use (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Bradycardia was noted in a 72-year-old woman following an unintentional overdose of epidural fentanyl (Russell, 1994).
    D) ASYSTOLE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old woman became asystolic following an unintentional overdose of epidural fentanyl on postoperative day 3. CPR was started and the patient developed ventricular fibrillation which reverted to sinus bradycardia following cardioversion; a palpable pulse was noted. She recovered without sequelae (Dawson, 1995).
    E) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dysrhythmias and chest pain have been reported infrequently with fentanyl use (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Fentanyl inhalation abuse has resulted in tachycardia (120 beats per minute) in a 36-year-old man (Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994).
    b) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Tachycardia (heart rate 100 beats/min or greater) was reported in 9 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=5) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=4) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    F) HYPERTENSIVE DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg or greater) was reported in 4 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=3) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=1) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DECREASED RESPIRATORY FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Fentanyl produces respiratory depression via direct action on brain stem respiratory centers. This results in a reduction in the responsiveness of the brain stem to increases in carbon dioxide and to electrical stimulation. There is a significant risk of respiratory depression with both therapeutic use or overdose of fentanyl (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    b) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 13 patients (17%) developed respiratory depression and 6 patients (7.9%) developed respiratory arrest (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    c) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Respiratory depression (respiratory rate of 10 or less, oxygen saturation of 90% or less) was reported in 9 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=6) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    B) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dyspnea has been reported with the therapeutic use of fentanyl (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 3 patients (3.9%) developed dyspnea (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    C) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) PARENTERAL: Apnea developed within 6 minutes of intravenous administration of 100 mcg fentanyl in a 23-year-old woman in labor (Garner et al, 1994).
    b) TRANSDERMAL: Opioid overdose occurred intraoperatively in a patient wearing a fentanyl patch after a warming blanket was applied. A steady decrease in respiratory rate (to 3 breaths/minute) was observed during the first hour after application of the warming blanket. Miosis was also observed. The patch was removed and naloxone was administered with good results (Frolich et al, 2001).
    c) EPIDURAL: Respiratory arrest occurred in 3 patients after epidural infusion of fentanyl and bupivacaine. Each patient responded dramatically to naloxone (Weightman, 1991).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INTENTIONAL EXPOSURE
    1) VOLATILIZATION: A respiratory rate of 6 breaths per minute was reported in a 36-year-old man following the volatilization and inhalation of the contents of a fentanyl patch (Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994). In another case, a 37-year-old woman was found apneic, unresponsive (Glasgow coma score of 3) with miosis after the volatilization and inhalation of the contents of a fentanyl patch (Souders et al, 2000).
    2) BUCCAL/DERMAL EXPOSURE: An adult was admitted to the Emergency Department in respiratory arrest unresponsive with fixed and dilated pupils. He was immediately intubated; a transdermal patch (75 mcg/hr) found in the buccal cavity and second patch found (75 mcg/hr) on the inner thigh. Resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful (Kramer & Tawney, 1998).
    3) INGESTION: Apnea developed shortly after ingestion of a 5 mg transdermal patch. Symptoms resolved with intravenous naloxone (Purucker & Swann, 2000).
    4) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 13 patients (17%) developed respiratory depression and 6 patients (7.9%) developed respiratory arrest (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    5) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Apnea was reported in 5 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=3) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=2) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    b) INADVERTENT EXPOSURE
    1) TRANSDERMAL: PEDIATRIC: Respiratory depression, with decreased respirations and decreased oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry 88% on room air), occurred in a 2-year-old boy who was inadvertently exposed to a transdermal fentanyl patch (Hardwick et al, 1997).
    c) RECURRENT RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION
    1) CASE SERIES: INGESTION: In a case series, 4 patients ages 22 to 38 years intentionally ingested the gel reservoirs of 50 mcg to 100 mcg/hour fentanyl transdermal patches resulting in recurrent respiratory depression. In one case, the patient ingested the gel from a 100 mcg/hour patch and applied another 100 mcg/hour patch to his buccal mucosa. In each case, the patient was found unconscious or severely impaired and was treated with, and responded to, prehospital IV naloxone. However, within 2 hours of arrival at the emergency department, each patient developed a recurrence of symptoms including oxygen desaturation (88% on room air to 93% on 100% oxygenation) and a decreased respiratory rate (8 to 11 breaths/minute). All cases were treated with additional doses of IV naloxone followed by continuous infusions for 5 to 12 hours. Three patients recovered and were discharged 24 to 27 hours after presentation. One patient was hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation and discharged 50 hours after presentation (D'Orazio & Fischel, 2012).
    2) CASE REPORT/PEDIATRIC: TRANSDERMAL: A 15-year-old girl was found apneic with pinpoint pupils 12 hours after intentionally applying 5 fentanyl dermal patches to her body. The strength of each patch was 100 mcg/hour for a total dose of 6 mg or 120 mcg/kg. She responded to IM naloxone prehospital with improved respirations and normal level of consciousness. However, a second dose of naloxone was required for recurrence of symptoms. Upon arrival at the emergency department, she was tachycardic, diaphoretic, her respiratory rate dropped from 6 to 2 breaths/minute, and her Glasgow Coma Scale score was 14. She was treated with 2 IV doses of naloxone over 30 minutes. She recovered after each naloxone administration but then deteriorated back into respiratory depression and a decreased level of consciousness. A naloxone IV infusion at 6 mcg/kg/hour was initiated and then increased to 12 mcg/kg/hour for 24 hours. She was weaned off the naloxone infusion over 12 hours with no recurrence of symptoms. She was discharged 9 days after admission with no residual effects (Lyttle et al, 2012).
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute lung injury may occur after severe opioid overdose (Glassroth et al, 1987; Jaffe & Martin, 1990; Dettmeyer et al, 2000; Warner-Smith et al, 2001; Sporer & Dorn, 2001) and may be a contributing factor in fatal overdoses.
    b) Acute lung injury was a common finding in a cluster of fentanyl-related deaths in drug addicts (Kronstrand et al, 1997). Excessive naloxone administration in the setting of opioid induced respiratory depression may precipitate acute lung injury in tolerant patients.
    c) CASE REPORT: Acute lung injury developed in a 27-year-old man following administration of 100 mcg fentanyl and 0.5 mg atropine. Tachycardia, hypotension and hypoxemia initially occurred, and worsened, with rales present throughout the lungs on physical exam. Chest x-ray showed diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and vascular congestion (Soto et al, 1992).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dizziness, anxiety, confusion and somnolence are common findings with therapeutic use of fentanyl (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    B) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chewing of fentanyl patches and inhalation of vapors following the heating of fentanyl patches has resulted in coma and respiratory depression (Pizon & Brooks, 2004; Arvanitis & Satonik, 2002).
    b) Intentional misuse of fentanyl patches placed on the scrotum has resulted in coma, due to rapid drug absorption and overdose (Schneir et al, 2001).
    c) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, coma developed in 35 patients (46%) (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    d) CASE REPORT/PEDIATRIC: TRANSDERMAL: A 15-year-old girl was found apneic with pinpoint pupils 12 hours after intentionally applying 5 fentanyl dermal patches to her body. The strength of each patch was 100 mcg/hour for a total dose of 6 mg or 120 mcg/kg. She responded to 2 doses of IM naloxone prehospital with improved respirations and normal level of consciousness. By the time she arrived at the emergency department (ED), she was tachycardic, diaphoretic, and her respiratory rate dropped from 6 to 2 breaths/minute. Her Glasgow Coma Scale score was 14 with pinpoint pupils. She was treated with, and responded to, repeat doses of IV naloxone in the ED but developed recurrent symptoms after each dose. A naloxone infusion was initiated at 6 mcg/kg/hour and then rapidly increased to 12 mcg/kg/hour for 24 hours for persistent clinical symptoms. She was gradually weaned off the naloxone infusion over 12 hours with no recurrence of symptoms. She was discharged 9 days after admission with no residual effects (Lyttle et al, 2012).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman, with an implanted intrathecal pump administering fentanyl, experienced dizziness approximately 5 hours after the pump was refilled, and was found unresponsive (with a Glasgow Coma Score subsequently determined to be 3) approximately 10 hours post-refill. With naloxone administration and supportive care, the patient recovered uneventfully. The patient's intrathecal pump was emptied, with a total of 16 mL of fentanyl aspirated instead of the expected 19.6 mL, indicating that 21,600 mcg of fentanyl was missing from the reservoir. Investigation of the pump revealed that the motor had stalled due to severe corrosion of the motor gear assembly, and may have caused overinfusion of fentanyl to the patient (Maino et al, 2014).
    f) CASE REPORT/TRANSDERMAL PATCH: A 19-year-old man with severe eczema, became comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale of 3), with a widespread rash and swollen face. Vital sign monitoring indicated a pulse rate between 30 and 40 beats/min and a respiratory rate of 4 breaths/min. An initial diagnosis of anaphylaxis was made and he received epinephrine, steroids, and antihistamines, with minimal clinical improvement. Miosis was noted, suggesting opiate toxicity. Following administration of IV naloxone, the patient completely recovered. Subsequent interview of the patient and his family revealed that he had been given a transdermal fentanyl patch 12 mcg, prescribed to his father, to help relieve symptoms associated with his eczema; however, it is believed that the patient's opiate toxicity was secondary to enhanced absorption of the transdermal patch on his eczematous skin (Doris & Sandilands, 2015).
    g) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Coma (Reaction Level Scale [RLS] of 4 or greater) was reported in 9 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=6) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    h) CASE REPORTS: Two patients became comatose following exposure to fentanyl and butyrfentanyl, a fentanyl analog (Backberg et al, 2015).
    1) The first patient, a 24-year-old man, recovering from respiratory arrest suspected to be secondary to heroin abuse, became cyanotic and collapsed, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and was subsequently comatose with a Reaction Level Scale (RLS) between 4 and 8. The patient was also hypothermic (35.8 degrees Celsius) and his pupils were miotic. With supportive care for 24 hours, the patient completely recovered. Laboratory analysis of a white powder that was found on the patient, and labeled as butyrfentanyl, determined the active ingredients to be fentanyl and butyrfentanyl at a molar ratio of approximately 7.5:1. Both substances were detected in the patient's serum and urine at a fentanyl:butyrfentanyl ratio of approximately 5:1 and approximately 16:1, respectively (Backberg et al, 2015).
    2) The second patient, a 19-year-old man, presented to emergency personnel comatose (RLS of 6), with respiratory depression approximately 8 hours after using a butyrfentanyl nasal spray. Following administration of naloxone, the patient presented to the ED completely awake (RLS 1) and anxious. Vital signs indicated tachycardia (109 beats/min), a blood pressure of 140/80 mmHg, a respiratory rate of 14 breaths/min, and a body temperature of 38.7 degrees Celsius, and the patient had metabolic acidosis. Following supportive care and observation in the ICU, the patient remained stable and was discharged within 24 hours. Analysis of the nasal spray determined that it contained fentanyl and butyrfentanyl as the active ingredients in a molar ratio of approximately 10:1. A serum sample from the patient, obtained approximately 6 hours post-presentation, was negative for butyrfentanyl but revealed a fentanyl level of 1.5 ng/mL (Backberg et al, 2015).
    C) DROWSY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional overdose of fentanyl transdermal patches, drowsiness and lethargy developed in 30 patients (39%) (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    D) VERTIGO
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, dizziness and vertigo developed in 5 patients (6.6%) (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    E) STUPOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Somnolence and respiratory depression developed in a caregiver after handling fentanyl patches. Symptoms resolved when gloves were used for future applications (Gardner-Nix, 2001).
    F) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Grand mal seizures have been reported with therapeutic doses of fentanyl (Safwat & Daniel, 1983).
    G) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: An injectable overdose of fentanyl resulted in the death of a 23-year-old man with cerebral edema observed at autopsy. The toxicological screen was negative for other drugs or alcohol (Matejczyk, 1988).
    H) DELIRIUM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Acute toxic delirium, manifested by extreme agitation, insomnia, hyperkinesia and involuntary movement of the lower extremities, was reported in a pediatric patient following the therapeutic use of fentanyl patches for pain management (Kuzma et al, 1995).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Agitation and delirium were reported in 3 patients with acetylfentanyl intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    I) NEUROLOGICAL FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants exposed to fentanyl. Of 103 preterm infants (mean gestational age 26.9 +/- 1.8 weeks) who underwent an MRI, 78 infants (76%) received fentanyl at a median cumulative dose of 3 mcg/kg (interquartile range 1 to 441 mcg/kg). The median duration of therapy was 2 days (interquartile range 1 to 7 days). A cumulative fentanyl dose in the first week of life was significantly associated with development of cerebellar hemorrhage, even after adjustment of confounding factors, including gestational age at birth, the 5-minute APGAR score, severity of early illness, patent ductus arteriosus requiring intervention, inotrope exposure, and hydrocortisone exposure. MRI scans also indicated a correlation between the cumulative fentanyl dose and significant reductions in the bifrontal diameter and the biparietal diameter as well as reductions in the cerebellar diameter which also remained significant after adjustment of confounding factors. Based on these results, a higher cumulative fentanyl dose in preterm infants is associated with an increased incidence of cerebellar injury and lower cerebellar diameter at term equivalent age; however, further investigation is warranted (McPherson et al, 2015).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Nausea and vomiting are common adverse effects with therapeutic use (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation is a common adverse effect with therapeutic use (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ABNORMAL RENAL FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine 100 mcmol/L or greater) was reported in 6 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=4) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=2) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    B) RETENTION OF URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Urine retention was reported in 4 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=3) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=1) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SWEATING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Sweating has been reported with therapeutic use of fentanyl products (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009). Increased perspiration may also be a sign of drug withdrawal (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    B) PALE - SYMPTOM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 3 patients (3.9%) developed pallor of the skin (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    b) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Cyanotic or pale skin was reported in 6 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=5) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=1) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    C) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) SUMMARY: Skin reactions including erythema, papules, itching and edema have been reported frequently with transdermal application (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    b) CASE REPORT: A diffuse non-pruritic macular papular rash, covering most of the body, occurred 18 days following the placement of a fentanyl patch on a 57-year-old woman (Stoukides & Stegman, 1992).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Redness of the hands, associated with soreness and burning, was reported in a caregiver following repeated dermal exposure to fentanyl patches. Symptoms resolved with the use of plastic gloves (Gardner-Nix, 2001).
    D) SKIN ABSORPTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) TRANSDERMAL PATCH
    1) HEAT-INDUCED RAPID ABSORPTION: Heat (eg, heating blankets, hot water bottles, saunas) applied to a fentanyl patch found on the skin may induce overdose effects, due to rapid absorption from the cutaneous site (None Listed, 2010; Newshan, 1998; Rose et al, 1993). An increase in body temperature may also increase the risk of developing fentanyl toxicity (None Listed, 2010).
    E) CYANOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: In a case series involving 76 cases of intentional ingestion of fentanyl transdermal patches, 3 patients (3.9%) developed cyanosis of the skin (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    b) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Cyanotic or pale skin was reported in 6 patients with either acetylfentanyl (n=5) or 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=1) intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INCREASED MUSCLE TONE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Truncal rigidity is a common and serious adverse effect of fentanyl, usually occurring during rapid intravenous infusion and high-dose fentanyl anesthesia (Nelson, 1998). Thoracic compliance is markedly decreased, impairing the ability to assist or control ventilation. Central venous pressure (CVP) may be transiently raised (Mets & James, 1992).
    b) Chest wall rigidity was reported in a neonate administered fentanyl during surgery (Wells et al, 1994).
    B) LARYNGISMUS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Fentanyl may induce masseter muscle spasm during extubation procedures resulting in laryngospasm, which may be reversed with naloxone (Baraka, 1995).
    C) MUSCLE RIGIDITY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Muscle rigidity accompanied by apnea with unconsciousness was reported in 6 of 12 volunteers given 15 mcg/kg of IV fentanyl alone (Streisand et al, 1991).
    D) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FENTANYL ANALOGS: The Swedish STRIDA project was started in 2010 to identify and monitor the occurrence of emerging drugs of abuse in Sweden. Approximately 350 cases were enrolled in the STRIDA project from April 2015 to November 2015. Of these 350 cases, 14 cases of fentanyl analog intoxications were analytically confirmed, involving acetylfentanyl (n=9), 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl (n=3), furanylfentanyl (n=1), and 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl in combination with furanylfentanyl (n=1). In addition, other drugs were also detected in these patients (eg, benzodiazepines, other opioids, pregabalin). Rhabdomyolysis (serum creatine kinase 25 mckat/L or greater or plasma myoglobin 3000 mcg/L or greater) was reported in 3 patients with acetylfentanyl intoxications (Helander et al, 2016).
    1) CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old man presented with rhabdomyolysis, swelling, paresthesia, and dermal erythema of the dorsal thigh muscles. Prior to presentation, he had been unconscious for several hours. Laboratory data at admission revealed a plasma myoglobin of 70,033 mcg/L, serum creatinine level of 561 mcmol/L, and a serum potassium level of 7.1 mmol/L. Treatment included dialysis for 3 days. Toxicologic analysis revealed exposure to acetylfentanyl in combination with clonazepam and ethanol (Helander et al, 2016).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Fentanyl is classified by the manufacturer as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of fentanyl use during pregnancy. Fentanyl is known to cross the placental barrier. Prolonged use of fentanyl during pregnancy can cause neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Symptoms of withdrawal include irritability, sleep disturbances, hyperactivity, tremor, vomiting, diarrhea, and failure to gain weight. This condition may become life-threatening without early recognition and treatment, and varies in terms of onset, duration, and severity based on the duration of use, rate of elimination of the drug in the newborn, maternal dose, and timing of last maternal use. If prolonged use of opioids during pregnancy is required, the patient should be advised of the risk of infant withdrawal syndrome. Teratogenic effects have not been clearly associated with use of narcotic analgesics during pregnancy; however use during pregnancy and/or labor has been associated with growth retardation, respiratory depression, fetal physical dependence and withdrawal. Fentanyl should not be used during labor and/or delivery as this may result in respiratory depression in the fetus or infant. It is recommended that fentanyl be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk to the fetus.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the teratogenic potential of this agent in humans (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014; Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS AND RABBITS: Fentanyl was embryotoxic, as administration at doses approximately equivalent to human recommended doses resulted in increased resorptions. No evidence of teratogenicity was observed with subQ administration during organogenesis; however a decrease in fetal weights occurred at a maternally toxic dose approximately 1.4 times the exposure of a single human dose and a reduction in pup growth and delayed development were observed. Pup survival at lactation day (LD) 4 was reduced to 48% and at LD 21 was reduced to 30% and 26%(Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    2) RATS AND RABBITS: The administration of fentanyl at doses approximately 2 times the daily human dose from day 7 to 21 via an implanted pump did not produce any evidence of teratogenicity. However, IV administration of fentanyl from gestation day 6 to 18 showed evidence of embryotoxicity. Treatment with fentanyl doses 3 times the human dose via an IV infusion from day 6 to day 18 of pregnancy, produced a slight decrease in the body weight of the live fetuses at the high dose, which may be attributed to maternal toxicity. Based on the study conditions, there was no evidence for fentanyl-induced adverse effects on embryo-fetal development at doses up to 0.4 mg/kg (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) RISK SUMMARY
    1) There are no adequate or well controlled studies of fentanyl use during human pregnancy. An increased risk of early embryonic lethality, decreased pup survival, and delays in developmental landmarks were demonstrated in animal reproduction and developmental studies (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015). Use fentanyl during pregnancy only if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk to the fetus (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system, 2012; Prod Info ONSOLIS(R) buccal soluble film, 2011; Prod Info Lazanda nasal spray, 2011; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transmucosal lozenge, 2011; Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011).
    B) LABOR AND DELIVERY
    1) Fentanyl should not be used during labor and/or delivery as this may result in respiratory depression in the fetus or infant (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015; Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system, 2012; Prod Info ONSOLIS(R) buccal soluble film, 2011; Prod Info Lazanda nasal spray, 2011; Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transmucosal lozenge, 2011; Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011).
    C) WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME
    1) Withdrawal symptoms (eg, irritability, hyperreflexia, hyperactivity, tremors, diaphoresis, tachypnea, poor feeding, rigidity, and diarrhea) and/or respiratory depression and seizures have been observed in neonates whose mothers were taking narcotic analgesics, including fentanyl, for prolonged periods during pregnancy or labor (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014; Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013; Kumar & Paes, 2003; Carrie et al, 1981; Blinick et al, 1973). Such effects have been rarely reported with epidural administration of fentanyl, particularly when high doses were used (Kumar & Paes, 2003).
    D) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: Treatment with 0.4 mg/kg/day of fentanyl via an IV infusion from day 6 of pregnancy through 3 weeks of lactation resulted in significantly decreased body weight in both male and female pups and decreased survival in pups at day 4. Doses approximately 0.4 and 1.6 times the daily human dose were found to alter physical landmarks of development (delayed incisor eruption and eye opening) and transient behavioral development (decreased locomotor activity at day 28 which recovered by day 50) (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Fentanyl is excreted in human milk. The health benefits of breastfeeding and the mother's clinical need for this drug should be measured along with the potential adverse fetal effects from the drug or the underlying maternal condition (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: Reproduction studies in rats have shown that fentanyl can impair fertility at doses equivalent to the range found in human dosing (Prod Info ONSOLIS(TM) buccal, soluble film, 2009).
    2) RATS: Administration of fentanyl for 28 days prior to mating had adverse effects on sperm parameters that affected fertility, including decreased sperm concentrations, decreased percent mobile sperm, and increased percent abnormal sperm. No effects on fertility were observed at doses approximately 5.7 times the exposure of a single 800 mg dose (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    3) RATS: IV administration of 0.3 times the human dose of fentanyl for 12 days impaired fertility (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014; Prod Info fentanyl citrate injection, 2005).
    4) RATS: No effects on fertility were observed in male and female rats administered with fentanyl doses approximately 1.6 times the daily human dose via continuous IV infusion for 28 days prior to mating (males) and for 14 days prior to mating until gestation day 16 (females) (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential in humans. In animal studies, no increased risk in tumors was found with fentanyl use.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential in humans (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) In a 2-year carcinogenicity study conducted in rats, fentanyl was not associated with an increased incidence of tumors in males (subcutaneous doses up to 33 mcg/kg/day) or females (100 mcg/kg/day) [0.16 and 0.39 times the human daily exposure obtained via the 100 mcg/hr patch based on AUC (0-24 hours)] (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).

Genotoxicity

    A) There was no evidence of mutagenicity in the Ames Salmonella assay, the primary rat hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis assay, the BALB/c3T3 transformation test, and human lymphocyte and CHO chromosomal aberration in-vitro assays (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor carefully for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Urine toxicology screens for opioids often do not detect synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. Plasma concentrations are available from specialty labs. They are not available rapidly and are not useful for guiding therapy, but may confirm exposure.
    D) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to exclude other causes or if the diagnosis of fentanyl toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Evaluate for pulmonary and central nervous system manifestation of toxicity or sequelae from toxicity.

Methods

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Radioimmunoassay, gas chromatography, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), and liquid-chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) are the common methods used for the analysis of fentanyl and some fentanyl-like compounds (Milone, 2012; Edinboro et al, 1997; Poklis, 1995).
    2) Some commercially available opiate immunoassays may not detect fentanyl and its many analogs (Perrone & DeRoos, 2007; Poklis, 1995). Fentanyl is unrelated to opiate analgesics and will not cross-react with these tests (Poklis, 1995).
    B) ACETYL FENTANYL
    1) In 14 fatal cases of overdose attributed to acetyl fentanyl first reported in March 6, 2013, toxicology testing showed positive results for fentanyl by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); however, results were not positive for fentanyl by GC/MS. As a result, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend conducting both ELISA screens and GC/MS confirmatory testing in cases of illicit opioid-related overdose (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2013).
    C) RAPID MASS SPECTROMETRY
    1) A rapid mass spectrometry method was developed to detect fentanyl and norfentanyl in forensic urine samples (Peer et al, 2007).
    D) GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY
    1) Fentanyl can be quantified by using GC/MS (Edinboro et al, 1997) and commonly used in postmortem evaluation (Tharp et al, 2004). It is considered the method of choice for both detection and quantitation of fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and their metabolites (Poklis, 1995).
    2) In general, illicit fentanyl analogs may be more difficult to analyze as compared to pharmaceutical fentanyl (Poklis, 1995).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with significant, persistent central nervous system depression should be admitted to the hospital. A patient needing more than 2 doses of naloxone should be admitted as he/she may need additional doses. Patients with coma, seizures, dysrhythmias, delirium, and those needing a naloxone infusion or who are intubated should be admitted to an intensive care setting. Patients who have ingested, or inserted rectally or vaginally a transdermal patch, should be admitted as absorption is unpredictable.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Respiratory depression may occur at doses just above a therapeutic dose. Children should be evaluated in the hospital and observed as they are generally opioid naive and may develop respiratory depression. Adults should be evaluated by a health care professional if they have received a higher than recommended low therapeutic dose, especially if opioid naive.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is not clear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) SUMMARY: Patients with deliberate exposures and all children with exposures should be sent to a health care facility for observation for at least 4 hours, as peak plasma concentration and symptoms will likely develop within this time period. Opioid-naive patients who have been exposed to a transdermal patch (even after patch removal) have the potential to manifest symptoms in a delayed fashion and should be observed for 8 hours, and admitted if symptoms persist. If the exposure was intravenous, the patient should be observed for 4 to 6 hours after the last naloxone dose, for recurrent CNS depression or acute lung injury. Asymptomatic children under 6 years of age should be observed in the Emergency Department for at least 8 hours following application of a transdermal fentanyl patch once patch is removed and the skin washed, as systemic absorption from the dermal depot continues after patch removal.
    B) Asymptomatic children under 6 years of age should be observed in the Emergency Department for at least 4 hours following an oral ingestion (any amount) or 8 hours after exposure to a transdermal fentanyl patch once the patch has been removed and the skin washed (Sachdeva & Stadnyk, 2005).
    C) Patients should be observed for return of respiratory depression and resedation after naloxone administration. The duration of action for naloxone is approximately 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the dose, route and the opioid agonist ingested (Howland, 2006).
    D) CASE REPORT: An 8-month-old was exposed to her grandmother's transdermal fentanyl patch (50 mcg) and was found unresponsive. Following 0.1 mg/kg of naloxone, the infant awoke immediately, but the child became drowsy 25 minutes later. A naloxone infusion was started and the infant was admitted. Severe drowsiness reoccurred approximately 9 hours after being asymptomatic; 2 additional doses of naloxone were given. Intubation was not required. The infant was discharged to home 36 hours after admission (Behrman & Goertemoeller, 2007).
    E) In a retrospective review of 726 patients meeting criteria for opioid overdoses, all were treated by paramedics or in ED with naloxone and bag-valve-mask ventilation. Less than 5%, excepting those that expired first, required hospital admission. Patients were admitted for the following reasons: acute lung injury, pneumonia or other infections, persistent respiratory depression and persistent alteration in mental status. The out-of-hospital treatment with naloxone and bag-valve-mask ventilation was all that the majority of patients required (Sporer et al, 1996).

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    B) Monitor carefully for CNS and respiratory depression.
    C) Urine toxicology screens for opioids often do not detect synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. Plasma concentrations are available from specialty labs. They are not available rapidly and are not useful for guiding therapy, but may confirm exposure.
    D) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to exclude other causes or if the diagnosis of fentanyl toxicity is uncertain.
    E) Evaluate for pulmonary and central nervous system manifestation of toxicity or sequelae from toxicity.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Fentanyl is absorbed rapidly, activated charcoal is unlikely to be of benefit and may cause aspiration; it should be avoided.
    B) Search for and remove any fentanyl patches on the patient's body.
    C) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    1) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    2) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    3) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TLet al,null).
    4) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    D) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    1) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TLet al,null).
    a) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    2) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    a) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    3) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    a) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    b) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    4) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    a) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    b) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    c) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    5) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    a) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    b) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    c) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    d) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    6) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    a) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    b) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    c) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    d) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    e) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    1) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    2) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    3) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    4) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    f) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    g) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    7) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    a) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    b) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    c) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    d) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    e) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    8) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    a) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Fentanyl is absorbed rapidly, GI decontamination is unlikely to be of benefit and may cause aspiration; it should be avoided. Search for and remove any fentanyl patches on the patient's body (including rectum and vagina).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs frequently, pulse oximetry, and continuous cardiac monitoring.
    2) Monitor carefully for CNS and respiratory depression.
    3) Urine toxicology screens for opioids often do not detect synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. Plasma concentrations are available from specialty labs. They are not available rapidly and are not useful for guiding therapy, but may confirm exposure.
    4) Routine lab work is usually not indicated, unless it is helpful to exclude other causes or if the diagnosis of fentanyl toxicity is uncertain.
    5) Evaluate for pulmonary and central nervous system manifestation of toxicity or sequelae from toxicity.
    B) NALOXONE
    1) NALOXONE/SUMMARY
    a) Naloxone, a pure opioid antagonist, reverses coma and respiratory depression from all opioids. It has no agonist effects and can safely be employed in a mixed or unknown overdose where it can be diagnostic and therapeutic without risk to the patient.
    b) Indicated in patients with mental status and respiratory depression possibly related to opioid overdose (Hoffman et al, 1991).
    c) DOSE: The initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated due to the risk of opioid withdrawal in an opioid-tolerant individual; if delay in obtaining venous access, may administer subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intranasally, via nebulizer (in a patient with spontaneous respirations) or via an endotracheal tube (Vanden Hoek,TLet al,null).
    d) Recurrence of opioid toxicity has been reported to occur in approximately 1 out of 3 adult ED opioid overdose cases after a response to naloxone. Recurrences are more likely with long-acting opioids (Watson et al, 1998)
    2) NALOXONE DOSE/ADULT
    a) INITIAL BOLUS DOSE: Because naloxone can produce opioid withdrawal in an opioid-dependent individual leading to severe agitation and hypertension, the initial dose of naloxone should be low (0.04 to 0.4 mg) with a repeat dosing as needed or dose escalation to 2 mg as indicated (Vanden Hoek,TLet al,null).
    1) This dose can also be given intramuscularly or subcutaneously in the absence of intravenous access (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008; Maio et al, 1987; Wanger et al, 1998).
    b) Larger doses may be needed to reverse opioid effects. Generally, if no response is observed after 8 to 10 milligrams has been administered, the diagnosis of opioid-induced respiratory depression should be questioned (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). Very large doses of naloxone (10 milligrams or more) may be required to reverse the effects of a buprenorphine overdose (Gal, 1989; Jasinski et al, 1978).
    1) Single doses of up to 24 milligrams have been given without adverse effect (Evans et al, 1973).
    c) REPEAT DOSE: The effective naloxone dose may have to be repeated every 20 to 90 minutes due to the much longer duration of action of the opioid agonist used(Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    1) OPIOID DEPENDENT PATIENTS: The goal of naloxone therapy is to reverse respiratory depression without precipitating significant withdrawal. Starting doses of naloxone 0.04 mg IV, or 0.001 mg/kg, have been suggested as appropriate for opioid-dependent patients without severe respiratory depression (Howland & Nelson, 2011). If necessary the dose may be repeated or increased gradually until the desired response is achieved (adequate respirations, ability to protect airway, responds to stimulation but no evidence of withdrawal) (Howland & Nelson, 2011). In the presence of opioid dependence, withdrawal symptoms typically appear within minutes of naloxone administration and subside in about 2 hours. The severity and duration of the withdrawal syndrome are dependant upon the naloxone dose and the degree and type of dependence.(Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    2) PRECAUTION should be taken in the presence of a mixed overdose of a sympathomimetic with an opioid. Administration of naloxone may provoke serious sympathomimetic toxicity by removing the protective opioid-mediated CNS depressant effects. Arrhythmogenic effects of naloxone may also be potentiated in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (McCann et al, 2002).
    d) NALOXONE DOSE/CHILDREN
    1) LESS THAN 5 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS THAN 20 KG: 0.1 mg/kg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneously maximum dose 2 mg; may repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008)
    2) 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER OR GREATER THAN 20 KG: 2 mg IV/intraosseous/IM/subcutaneouslymay repeat dose every 2 to 5 minutes until symptoms improve (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Krauss & Green, 2006). Although naloxone may be given via the endotracheal tube for pediatric resuscitation, optimal doses are unknown. Some experts have recommended using 2 to 3 times the IV dose (Kleinman et al, 2010)
    3) AVOIDANCE OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: In cases of known or suspected chronic opioid therapy, a lower dose of 0.01 mg/kg may be considered and titrated to effect to avoid withdrawal: INITIAL DOSE: 0.01 mg/kg body weight given IV. If this does not result in clinical improvement, an additional dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight may be given. It may be given by the IM or subQ route if the IV route is not available (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008)
    e) NALOXONE DOSE/NEONATE
    1) The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends a neonatal dose of 0.1 mg/kg IV or intratracheally from birth until age 5 years or 20 kilograms of body weight (AAP, 1989; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) Smaller doses (10 to 30 mcg/kg IV) have been successful in the setting of exposure via maternal administration of narcotics or administration to neonates in therapeutic doses for anesthesia (Wiener et al, 1977; Welles et al, 1984; Fischer & Cook, 1974; Brice et al, 1979).
    3) POTENTIAL OF WITHDRAWAL: The risk of precipitating withdrawal in an addicted neonate should be considered. Withdrawal seizures have been provoked in infants from opioid-abusing mothers when the infants were given naloxone at birth to stimulate breathing (Gibbs et al, 1989).
    4) In cases of inadvertent administration of an opioid overdose to a neonate, larger doses may be required. In one case of oral morphine intoxication, 0.16 milligram/kilogram/hour was required for 5 days (Tenenbein, 1984).
    f) NALOXONE/ALTERNATE ROUTES
    1) If intravenous access cannot be rapidly established, naloxone can be administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, intranasally, or via inhaled nebulization in patients with spontaneous respirations.
    2) INTRAMUSCULAR/SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES: If an intravenous line cannot be secured due to hypoperfusion or lack of adequate veins then naloxone can be administered by other routes.
    3) The intramuscular or subcutaneous routes are effective if hypoperfusion is not present (Prod Info naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, 2008). The delay required to establish an IV, offsets the slower rate of subcutaneous absorption (Wanger et al, 1998).
    4) Naloxone Evzio(TM) is a hand-held autoinjector intended for the emergency treatment of known or suspected opioid overdose. The autoinjector is equipped with an electronic voice instruction system to assist caregivers with administration. It is available as 0.4 mg/0.4 mL solution for injection in a pre-filled auto-injector (Prod Info EVZIO(TM) injection solution, 2014).
    5) INTRANASAL ROUTE: Intranasal naloxone has been shown to be effective in opioid overdose; bioavailability appears similar to the intravenous route (Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). Based on several case series of patients with suspected opiate overdose, the average response time of 3.4 minutes was observed using a formulation of 1 mg/mL/nostril by a mucosal atomization device (Kerr et al, 2009; Kelly & Koutsogiannis, 2002). However, a young adult who intentionally masticated two 25 mcg fentanyl patches and developed agonal respirations (6 breaths per minute), decreased mental status and mitotic pupils did not respond to intranasal naloxone (1 mg in each nostril) administered by paramedics. After 11 minutes, paramedics placed an IV and administered 1 mg of IV naloxone; respirations normalized and mental status improved. Upon admission, 2 additional doses of naloxone 0.4 mg IV were needed. The patient was monitored overnight and discharged the following day without sequelae. Its suggested that intranasal administration can lead to unpredictable absorption (Zuckerman et al, 2014).
    a) Narcan(R) nasal spray is supplied as a single 4 mg dose of naloxone hydrochloride in a 0.1 mL intranasal spray (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    b) FDA DOSING: Initial dose: 1 spray (4 mg) intranasally into 1 nostril. Subsequent doses: Use a new Narcan(R) nasal spray and administer into alternating nostrils. May repeat dose every 2 to 3 minutes. Requirement for repeat dosing is dependent on the amount, type, and route of administration of the opioid being antagonized. Higher or repeat doses may be required for partial agonists or mixed agonist/antagonists (Prod Info NARCAN(R) nasal spray, 2015).
    c) AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION GUIDELINE DOSING: Usual dose: 2 mg intranasally as soon as possible; may repeat after 4 minutes (Lavonas et al, 2015). Higher doses may be required with atypical opioids (VandenHoek et al, 2010).
    d) ABSORPTION: Based on limited data, the absorption rate of intranasal administration is comparable to intravenous administration. The peak plasma concentration of intranasal administration is estimated to be 3 minutes which is similar to the intravenous route (Kerr et al, 2009). In rare cases, nasal absorption may be inhibited by injury, prior use of intranasal drugs, or excessive secretions (Kerr et al, 2009).
    6) NEBULIZED ROUTE: DOSE: A suggested dose is 2 mg naloxone with 3 mL of normal saline for suspected opioid overdose in patients with some spontaneous respirations (Weber et al, 2012).
    7) ENDOTRACHEAL ROUTE: Endotracheal administration of naloxone can be effective(Tandberg & Abercrombie, 1982), optimum dose unknown but 2 to 3 times the intravenous dose had been recommended by some (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    g) NALOXONE/CONTINUOUS INFUSION METHOD
    1) A continuous infusion of naloxone may be employed in circumstances of opioid overdose with long acting opioids (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Redfern, 1983).
    2) The patient is given an initial dose of IV naloxone to achieve reversal of opioid effects and is then started on a continuous infusion to maintain this state of antagonism.
    3) DOSE: Utilize two-thirds of the initial naloxone bolus on an hourly basis (Howland & Nelson, 2011; Mofenson & Caraccio, 1987). For an adult, prepare the dose by multiplying the effective bolus dose by 6.6, and add that amount to 1000 mL and administer at an IV infusion rate of 100 mL/hour (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    4) Dose and duration of action of naloxone therapy varies based on several factors; continuous monitoring should be used to prevent withdrawal induction (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    5) Observe patients for evidence of CNS or respiratory depression for at least 2 hours after discontinuing the infusion (Howland & Nelson, 2011).
    h) NALOXONE/PREGNANCY
    1) In general, the smallest dose of naloxone required to reverse life threatening opioid effects should be used in pregnant women. Naloxone detoxification of opioid addicts during pregnancy may result in fetal distress, meconium staining and fetal death (Zuspan et al, 1975). When naloxone is used during pregnancy, opioid abstinence may be provoked in utero (Umans & Szeto, 1985).
    C) NALMEFENE
    1) MANAGEMENT OF OPIOID OVERDOSE: Nalmefene is not indicated for acute opioid overdose. The initial dose is 0.5 mg/70 kg. If needed, a second dose of 1.0 mg/70 kg may be given 2 to 5 minutes later. If after following a total dose of 1.5 mg/70 kg, no clinical response has been achieved, it is unlikely that further doses will be effective. The reversal effect of nalmefene varies. If a partial reversing dose is used (1 mcg/kg), reversal may only last 30 to 60 minutes due to redistribution of the drug or persistent opioid effect. At higher doses, which is usually the full reversal (1 mg/70kg) dose, the duration of action for nalmefene may last several hours. Repeated dosing may be indicated for a recurrence of respiratory depression; the dose should be titrated to response (Prod Info REVEX(R) injection, 2006).
    a) ALTERNATIVE ROUTES: If IV access is unavailable, the intramuscular or subcutaneous route may be used. However, the effect of a 1 mg dose may delayed by 5 to 15 minutes (Howland, 2006a).
    b) WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME: Using higher dosages or shorter intervals is likely to increase the risk of symptoms related to acute withdrawal (i.e., nausea, vomiting, elevated blood pressure, and anxiety) (Prod Info REVEX(R) injection, 2006).
    D) NALTREXONE
    1) OPIOID ADDICTION: Naltrexone is an effective opioid antagonist in the management of opiate addiction/dependence, but is NOT used for opioid overdose. Studies have shown that 50 mg of naltrexone will block the effect of 25 mg of heroin for up to 24 hours. Data have also shown that doubling the dose of naltrexone will double the duration of action and tripling the dose will provide blockade for up to 72 hours (Prod Info VIVITROL(TM) extended-release injectable suspension, 2006).
    E) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Administer oxygen and assist ventilation for respiratory depression. Orotracheal intubation for airway protection should be performed early in cases of obtundation and/or respiratory depression that do not respond to naloxone, or in patients who develop severe acute lung injury.
    F) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    G) SEIZURE
    1) Seizures are rare, but may be a result of hypoxia or due to properties of certain agents (e.g., meperidine, tramadol, propoxyphene). If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Administer intravenous, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or propofol if seizures persist.
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2010; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    H) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) If CNS depression is present, administer naloxone and correct hypoxia. Hypotension should initially be treated with a saline bolus, if patient can tolerate a fluid load, then adrenergic vasopressors to raise mean arterial pressure.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    3) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    4) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: ADULT: INTRAVENOUS: Intentional misuse of intravenous fentanyl can result in rapid death due to respiratory depression. If a product designed for slow release (eg transdermal patch) is abused in a manner that allows rapid release of the entire dose (eg smoked, chewed, swallowed inserted rectally or vaginally, injected, insufflated), severe, potentially fatal toxicity is expected. TRANSDERMAL: Fentanyl transdermal patches have been intentionally misused via inhalation, ingestion and intravenous exposure. Deaths have been reported. An adult died after cutting apart a 7.5 mg fentanyl transdermal patch and ingesting the contents. In another case, typical opioid toxicity occurred in an adult who intentionally inserted several fentanyl patches rectally; recovery was uneventful following removal. PEDIATRIC: A 15-year-old girl survived respiratory depression and coma after applying 5 transdermal 100 mcg/hour fentanyl patches to her body that were left in place for 12 hours. SUBLINGUAL SPRAY: Sublingual spray fentanyl is not bioequivalent with other forms of fentanyl. PEDIATRIC: A 12-month-old (11 kg) died after ingesting a transdermal fentanyl patch 25 mcg/hr (4.2 mg).
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: FENTANYL CITRATE INJECTION: Adjunct to general anesthesia, doses may vary from 2 mcg/kg (minor surgical procedure) up to 20 to 50 mcg/kg (major surgical procedure). Adjunctive for Regional Anesthesia: 50 to 100 mcg IM or IV slowly over 1 to 2 minutes. Premedication: 50 to 100 mcg IM 30 to 60 minutes prior to surgery. BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM: Initial dose: 200 mcg for the management of pain in patients who are already opioid tolerant. Titrate dose using 200 mcg film increments up to a maximum of four 200 mcg films or a single 1200 mcg film. ORAL TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE: Initial dose: 200 mcg/unit. The maximum dose for any breakthrough pain episode is 2 doses. Patients should wait at least 4 hrs before treating another episode of breakthrough pain. TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM: In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24 hrs morphine requirement; replace patch every 72 hrs. PEDIATRIC: FENTANYL CITRATE INJECTION: Children 2 to 12 years of age: Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia: A reduced dose as low as 2 to 3 mcg/kg is recommended. BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM: Safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age. TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE: Safety and efficacy have not been determined in children 16 years of age and less. TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM: Children 2 years and older: In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24 hr morphine requirement; replace patch every 72 hrs.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) FENTANYL
    1) IONTOPHORETIC TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    a) Apply one iontophoretic transdermal system to an area of intact, non-irritated, and non-irradiated skin on the chest or upper outer arm only, and activate to initiate administration of doses. Each activation provides a 40-mcg dose, with each dose delivered over a 10-minute period. MAX DOSE, 3.2 mg in a 24-hour period (equivalent of 80 doses); MAX DURATION of use, 3 days (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015).
    2) SUBLINGUAL SPRAY
    a) Recommended starting dose is 100 mcg; if pain is not relieved an additional dose of the same strength may be used after 30 minutes. Patients should wait at least 4 hours before treating another episode of pain. If needed, a dose may be titrated in a stepwise method up to 1600 mcg. Sublingual fentanyl is not bioequivalent with other fentanyl products. Do not convert on a mcg per mcg basis (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2013).
    3) SUBLINGUAL TABLET
    a) Recommended starting dose is a single 100 mcg in all patients, if pain is not relieved an additional dose of the same strength may be used after 30 minutes. Patients should wait at least 2 hours before treating another episode of pain. If needed, a dose may be titrated in a stepwise method up to 800 mcg. Sublingual fentanyl is not bioequivalent with other fentanyl products. Do not convert on a mcg per mcg basis (Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2014).
    4) TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    a) In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24-hour morphine requirement and can range from 25 mcg/hr to 100 mcg/hr or higher. Patches are replaced every 72 hours. Appropriate dosage increments should be based on the daily use of supplemental opioids with the equivalency of morphine 45 mg/day orally to a 12 mcg/hr increase in the transdermal fentanyl dose (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014).
    B) FENTANYL CITRATE
    1) BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM
    a) Initial dose: 200 mcg placed in the buccal cavity and allowed to disintegrate. If pain is not adequately controlled within 30 minutes, administer alternate rescue medication; do not use more than 1 dose of per episode of breakthrough pain. Patients should wait at least 2 hours before treating another episode of pain. Titrate dose in a stepwise manner up to 1200 mcg. Do not use more than 4 of the 200 mcg films at one time (use a single 1200 mcg film in the next episode if pain relief is not achieved after four 200 mcg films and patient has tolerated 800 mcg dose). MAX dose is 1200 mcg (Prod Info ONSOLIS(R) buccal soluble film, 2011).
    2) BUCCAL TABLET
    a) Recommended initial dose is 100 mcg; may repeat once after 30 minutes; do not use more than 2 doses per episode of breakthrough pain; repeated treatment for subsequent episode should be separated by at least 4 hours; if adequate pain relief is achieved, use this dose for subsequent episodes of breakthrough pain (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    b) For dose titration, increase dose initially in multiples of 100 mcg up to 400 mcg, then by increments of 200 mcg to 600 mcg, or 800 mcg as needed; may repeat the same dose after 30 minutes; do not use more than 2 doses per episode of breakthrough pain; repeated treatment of subsequent episode should be separated by at least 4 hours; do not use more than 4 tablets simultaneously (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    c) For maintenance dose, once a successful dose has been found, use only 1 dose of the appropriate strength per breakthrough pain episode; may administer sublingually once maintenance dose is determined (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    3) INJECTION
    a) PREMEDICATION: 50 to 100 mcg (0.05 to 0.1 mg) (1 to 2 mL) given IM 30 to 60 minutes prior to surgery (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    b) ADJUNCT TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA (TOTAL DOSAGE)
    1) LOW DOSE: 2 mcg/kg (0.002 mg/kg; 0.04 mL/kg) (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012)
    2) MODERATE DOSE: 2 to 20 mcg/kg (0.002 to 0.02 mg/kg; 0.04 to 0.4 mL/kg) (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    3) HIGH DOSE (eg, cardiac bypass, neurosurgery): 20 to 50 mcg/kg (0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg; 0.4 to 1 mL/kg) (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    c) ADJUNCT TO REGIONAL ANESTHESIA: 50 to 100 mcg (0.05 to 0.1 mg) (1 to 2 mL) given IM or slow IV over 1 to 2 minutes (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    d) POST-OPERATIVELY: 50 to 100 mcg (0.05 to 0.1 mg) (1 to 2 mL) may be given IM for pain control, tachypnea, and emergent delirium. The dose can be repeated in 1 to 2 hours as needed (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    4) INTRANASAL
    a) Initial dose: 100 mcg (1 spray into 1 nostril). If pain is not adequately controlled within 30 minutes, administer an alternate rescue medication; do not use more than 1 dose per episode of breakthrough pain. Patients should wait at least 2 hours before treating another episode of pain. If needed, a dose may be titrated in a stepwise method up to 800 mcg. Intranasal fentanyl citrate is not bioequivalent with other fentanyl products. Do not convert on a mcg per mcg basis (Prod Info Lazanda(R) nasal spray, 2012).
    5) TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE
    a) General: The tablet is fixed to a plastic stick; similar to a lollipop. The lollipop should be held between the gum and cheek for about 15 minutes (None Listed, 2002).
    b) Initial dose: 200 mcg (one unit) consumed over 15 minutes. If pain is not relieved an additional dose of the same strength may be used 15 minutes after completion of the first dose. Patients should wait at least 4 hours before treating another episode of pain. If needed, a dose may be titrated in a stepwise method up to 1600 mcg. Limit consumption to 4 units or less per day (Prod Info fentanyl citrate oral lozenge, 2014).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) GENERAL
    1) Children are especially sensitive to the effects of fentanyl and should be opioid tolerant or observed when receiving fentanyl.
    B) FENTANYL
    1) IONTOPHORETIC TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    a) Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 18 years have not been established (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015).
    2) SUBLINGUAL SPRAY
    a) Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 18 years have not been established (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2013).
    3) SUBLINGUAL TABLETS
    a) Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 18 years have not been established (Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2014).
    4) TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    a) CHILDREN 2 YEARS AND OLDER: In opioid-tolerant patients, the transdermal fentanyl dosage is based on the patient's current 24-hour morphine requirement and can range from 25 mcg/hr to 100 mcg/hr or higher. Patches are replaced every 72 hours. Appropriate dosage increments should be based on the daily use of supplemental opioids with the equivalency of morphine 45 mg/day orally to a 12 mcg/hr increase in the transdermal fentanyl dose (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, 2014).
    C) FENTANYL CITRATE
    1) BUCCAL SOLUBLE FILM
    a) The safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age (Prod Info ONSOLIS(R) buccal soluble film, 2011).
    2) BUCCAL TABLET
    a) The safety and efficacy have not been established in pediatric patients less than 18 years of age (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    3) INJECTION
    a) 2 TO 12 YEARS OF AGE: the recommended dose for induction and maintenance of anesthesia is 2 to 3 mcg/kg IV (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012).
    b) INTERMITTENT IV DOSE : Initial dose, 0.5 to 1 mcg/kg (maximum 50 mcg/dose) IV, repeat every 1 to 3 minutes if necessary to desired effect, up to 5 mcg/kg in 10 minutes (Mencia et al, 2007; Playfor et al, 2006; Krauss & Green, 2006; Bauman & McManus, 2005; Godambe et al, 2003; Berde & Sethna, 2002; Kennedy et al, 1998; Algren & Algren, 1996).
    c) IV CONTINUOUS INFUSION: Initially, 0.5 to 2 mcg/kg/hour IV (Mencia et al, 2007; Brislin & Rose, 2005; Greco & Berde, 2005; Berde & Sethna, 2002; Katz & Kelly, 1993; Hartwig et al, 1991). Titrate infusion as necessary for adequate sedation and pain control. Bolus doses of 1 to 2 mcg/kg IV have been used for breakthrough undersedation (Darnell et al, 2008).
    4) INTRANASAL
    a) According to the manufacturer, safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 18 years have not been established (Prod Info Lazanda(R) nasal spray, 2012).
    b) 1 YEAR AND OLDER: initial, 1.5 mcg/kg intranasally (Crellin et al, 2010; Finn & Harris, 2010; Holdgate et al, 2010; Cole et al, 2009). In clinical studies, additional doses of 0.5 to 1 mcg/kg were used for inadequate pain control following the first dose (Crellin et al, 2010; Cole et al, 2009).
    5) TRANSMUCOSAL LOZENGE
    a) LESS THAN 16 YEARS OF AGE: According to the manufacturer, safety and effectiveness have not been established (Prod Info fentanyl citrate oral lozenge, 2014).
    b) 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER: 200 mcg (one unit) consumed over 15 minutes. If pain is not relieved an additional dose of the same strength may be used 15 minutes after completion of the first dose. Patients should wait at least 4 hours before treating another episode of pain. If needed, a dose may be titrated in a stepwise method up to 1600 mcg. Limit consumption to 4 units or less per day (Prod Info fentanyl citrate oral lozenge, 2014).
    c) 2 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER: Doses of 10 to 15 mcg/kg (maximum 400 mcg/dose) oral transmucosal have been used for procedural sedation or premedication in pediatric clinical studies (Mahar et al, 2007; Brislin & Rose, 2005; Binstock et al, 2004; Robert et al, 2003; Klein et al, 2002; Wheeler et al, 2002; Epstein et al, 1996; Schechter et al, 1995; Friesen et al, 1995). In a clinical study, 15 opioid-tolerant pediatric patients (range: 5 to 15 years) were treated with the transmucosal lozenge for breakthrough pain. Most of the patients (n=12) received doses between 200 and 600 mcg. However, the study was too small to assess the overall safety and efficacy of this drug in this patient population (Prod Info ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, 2009).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    1) PEDIATRIC
    a) A 12 month old girl (weight 11 kg) died after ingesting a used transdermal fentanyl patch 25 mcg/hr (4.2 mg) (Teske et al, 2007).
    2) ADULT
    a) CASE SERIES: Seven adults died following chewing or swallowing fentanyl patches. Of the 7 cases, 2 deaths were related to fentanyl overdose, 3 were caused by a fentanyl and alcohol overdose, one was a mixed ingestion and the last case was due to fentanyl and underlying medical condition. In this series, all of the patients were exposed by "chewing" on the fentanyl patch; one patient was also noted to have several patches on their body (Woodall et al, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: INTRAVENOUS: A 35-year-old woman, with a history of intravenous drug use, intravenously injected the contents of a 5 mg transdermal fentanyl patch with another individual. Prior to hospitalization the patient had a cardiorespiratory arrest and an initial rhythm of electromechanical dissociation that deteriorated into ventricular fibrillation. Upon admission, the patient was unresponsive with dilated and fixed pupils. The next day there was ongoing evidence of severe neurologic damage and multiorgan failure; care was withdrawn and the patient died (Reeves & Ginifer, 2002).
    c) CASE REPORT/INGESTION: Death was reported in a 43-year-old man who cut apart a 7.5 mg fentanyl transdermal patch, then sucked and chewed on the patch contents (Gaultieri et al, 2000).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man, with a history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, received two 75-mcg/hour fentanyl patches for pain management. Approximately 5 hours after initiation of therapy, one of the patches could not be found and was replaced. Over the next 15 hours, the patient's vital signs were normal; however, at 16.3 hours after beginning therapy, the patient was found apneic, pulseless, and cyanotic. A fentanyl patch was removed from the patient's oropharynx; however, despite resuscitative efforts, the patient died 16.7 hours after beginning transdermal fentanyl therapy (Moore et al, 2015).
    B) INTRAVENOUS
    1) Intentional misuse of pharmaceutical fentanyl has been well recognized among health professionals (Firestone et al, 2009; Sutlovic & Definis-Gojanovic, 2007). It has also been misused by individuals with a history of heroin use. Death is usually rapid. In many cases, the victims are found dead. Rapid cessation of breathing appears to be the most likely cause of death; pulmonary edema was a consistent postmortem finding among victims in one study (Henderson, 1991).
    C) ILLICIT USE
    1) There have been several outbreaks of fentanyl-related deaths due to fentanyl-laced heroin and cocaine sold by drug dealers. In Chicago during April 2005 through December 2006, hundreds of individuals died from a lethal injection of fentanyl-laced heroin that was distributed by drug dealers for free to attract new clients (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008; Schumann et al, 2008; Boddiger, 2006).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM
    1) ROUTES OF EXPOSURE
    a) INGESTION: Acute opioid intoxication occurred when a new fentanyl patch was placed into a cup of hot water, allowed to steep for several minutes, with the liquid subsequently consumed. The woman became unresponsive within minutes of drinking the liquid. The patient was hypotensive with pinpoint pupils and hypoventilation upon arrival to the Emergency Department. Following administration of naloxone, her neurologic status improved. The patient was discharged after 8 hours of observation with no residual effects. The estimated dose absorbed was 1.6 mg (Barrueto et al, 2004).
    b) INGESTION: Whole patch ingestion was reported in 76 cases of fentanyl ingestion over a period of 10 years. Of the 76 patients, 57% ingested one patch, 15% ingested two or more patches and approximately 2 to 3% ingested three or more patches. The most common symptom noted was coma and the most common treatment administered was naloxone and IV fluids. Death occurred in two patients (Mrvos et al, 2011).
    c) INHALATION: A man was observed emptying the contents of a fentanyl patch onto aluminum foil and heating the contents; he collapsed after taking one inhalation. Paramedics gave naloxone and the patient was fully alert and oriented within 30 minutes. He was discharged with no residual effects. The patient subsequently died following another episode of fentanyl inhalation (Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994).
    d) RECTAL: Intentional rectal insertion of 3 fentanyl patches (100 mcg/hr) caused coma and respiratory depression in a 41-year-old man. Despite receiving 6 mg of naloxone, the patient failed to respond and was intubated. Within 1 hour of removal of the patches, the patient awoke and recovered uneventfully (Coon et al, 2005).
    e) TRANSDERMAL: PEDIATRIC: A 15-year-old girl developed recurrent coma and respiratory depression after intentionally applying 5 fentanyl dermal patches to her body. The strength of each patch was 100 mcg/hour for a total dose of 6 mg or 120 mcg/kg. She was found apneic with pinpoint pupils 12 hours after applying the patches. She was treated with an IV naloxone infusion over 24 hours. She was weaned off the naloxone infusion over 12 hours with no recurrence of symptoms. Nine days after admission she was discharged without residual effects (Lyttle et al, 2012).
    B) INTRATHECALLY
    1) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman, with an implanted intrathecal pump administering fentanyl, experienced dizziness approximately 5 hours after the pump was refilled, and was found unresponsive (with a Glasgow Coma Score subsequently determined to be 3) approximately 10 hours post-refill. With naloxone administration and supportive care, the patient recovered uneventfully. The patient's intrathecal pump was emptied, with a total of 16 mL of fentanyl aspirated instead of the expected 19.6 mL, indicating that 21,600 mcg of fentanyl was missing from the reservoir. Investigation of the pump revealed that the motor had stalled due to severe corrosion of the motor gear assembly, and may have caused overinfusion of fentanyl to the patient (Maino et al, 2014).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) TRANSDERMAL
    a) In a forensic postmortem toxicology study involving 118 fatalities (ie, deaths were due to other causes and not related to fentanyl misuse or overdose) associated with transdermal fentanyl use, evidence of a consistent correlation between postmortem fentanyl blood concentrations (range: 1.05 mcg/L to 39.32 mcg/L) and therapeutic fentanyl doses (dose range: 25 mcg to greater than 100 mcg/hour) was not observed. Further analysis showed that fentanyl blood concentrations of the 118 postmortem samples were considerably higher than fentanyl concentrations of 27 living patients taking therapeutic transdermal fentanyl doses from 12.5 mcg to greater than 100 mcg/hour (serum fentanyl concentration range: 1.06 mcg/L to 3.34 mcg/L). The results suggest that postmortem fentanyl concentrations cannot be used alone to determine if a fentanyl intoxication occurred (Andresen et al, 2012).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) POSTMORTEM
    a) PEDIATRIC
    1) TRANSDERMAL PATCH: A 12-month-old girl (weight 11 kg) was found unresponsive 2 hours after being put to bed and resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. Upon autopsy, a transdermal fentanyl patch 25 mcg/hr (4.2 mg) was found in the stomach, which was prescribed for an adult in the household. Distribution of fentanyl was as follows (Teske et al, 2007):
    1) Femoral blood: 5.6 ng/mL
    2) Heart blood: 19 ng/mL
    3) Liver: 235 ng/g
    4) Kidney: 37 ng/g
    5) Urine: Positive
    6) Stomach contents: 4,460 ng/g (gastric contents {76.5 g} was collected (0.34 mg fentanyl)
    b) ADULT
    1) SUMMARY/CASE SERIES: In one study, fentanyl concentrations were obtained in 23 postmortem cases, the findings suggest that significant overlap may occur between therapeutic concentrations of fentanyl and lethal concentrations. Serum concentrations should be interpreted cautiously, and the patient's medical history and autopsy findings should be taken in consideration in determining the cause of death. Tolerance appears to develop in some patients that are receiving chronic fentanyl therapy. Of the 19 cases that were found to be drug overdoses, fentanyl alone was responsible for 8 deaths, with mean and median fentanyl concentrations of 36 (SD 38) mcg/L and 22 mcg/L, respectively. The remaining 11 cases were due to a mixed drug overdose with mean fentanyl concentration of 31 (SD 46) mcg/L (range: 5 to 152 mcg/L). As a comparison, 11 inpatients receiving fentanyl for chronic pain had serum levels drawn. Nine patients had concentrations of less than 4 mcg/L, and 2 had concentrations of 8.5 mcg/L and 9.9 mcg/L , respectively after receiving fentanyl for 3 months for chronic pain (Thompson et al, 2007).
    2) INTRAVENOUS: An adult man who injected an unknown amount of fentanyl intravenously was found dead. Postmortem levels included: serum, 17.7 mcg/L; blood, 27.5 mcg/L; urine, 92.7 mcg/L; liver, 77.5 mcg/kg; and brain, 30.2 mcg/kg (Chaturvedi et al, 1990). In another case, a woman was found dead after injecting an unknown amount of fentanyl, and had a postmortem blood concentration of 540 mcg/L, urine 95 mcg/g, and stomach tissue mixed with blood of 40 mcg/g (Sutlovic & Definis-Gojanovic, 2007).
    3) TRANSDERMAL/INGESTION: Postmortem serum, taken from femoral blood, revealed fentanyl and norfentanyl levels of 2.5 and 4.4 ng/mL, respectively, in a 43-year-old man who ate the contents of a 7.5 mg fentanyl transdermal patch (Gaultieri et al, 2000).
    4) TRANSDERMAL/INTRAVENOUS: In a series of 4 fatal cases of intravenous exposure to fentanyl following extraction from a transdermal patch, the postmortem blood concentrations ranged from 5 to 27 mcg/L. All of the deaths were attributed to fentanyl toxicity (Tharp et al, 2004).
    5) TRANSDERMAL/CASE SERIES: Seven adults died following oral abuse or potential abuse of fentanyl patches. Of the 7 cases, 2 deaths were related to fentanyl alone overdose, 3 were caused by a fentanyl and alcohol overdose, one was a mixed ingestion, and the last case was due to fentanyl and an underlying medical condition. Postmortem blood concentrations for all cases ranged from 7 to 97 ng/mL. Of the 2 cases that were due to fentanyl alone, the blood fentanyl concentrations were 13 and 22 ng/mL, respectively (Woodall et al, 2008).
    6) TRANSDERMAL/INHALATION: Postmortem fentanyl concentrations were as follows: femoral blood 2.66 ng/mL, heart blood 6.05 ng/mL, urine 41 ng/mL, vitreous 41 ng/mL and liver 122 ng/g in an adult who had heated the contents of a fentanyl transdermal patch and inhaled the fumes (Marquardt & Tharratt, 1994).
    7) TRANSDERMAL/EXCESSIVE APPLICATION: An 83-year-old woman with terminal cancer was found dead with three 100 mcg/hr fentanyl patches on her chest. The postmortem blood concentration was 25 ng/mL. It was estimated that 3 patches of 100 mcg/hr should produce a blood fentanyl concentration of 10 ng/mL with a 24 hr application. It was suggested that fentanyl metabolism may have been decreased based on age or reduced metabolism (Edinboro et al, 1997).
    8) CASE REPORT: Blood fentanyl concentration in a man found dead of an overdose was 4.9 ng/mL; liver concentration was 5.9 ng/g (Levine et al, 1990).
    9) CASE SERIES: In a series of 23 autopsy cases of fentanyl misuse and abuse, the average fentanyl concentrations were as follows: blood, 18 mcg/L ({n=23} range 2 to 48 mcg/L); liver, 399 mcg/L ({n=8} range 64 to 1465 mcg/L); bile, 56 mcg/L ({n=8} range 9 to 205 mcg/L); and urine, 195 mcg/L ({n=7} range 34 to 674 mcg/L), respectively (Kuhlman et al, 2003).
    10) CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man, with a history of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, received two 75-mcg/hour fentanyl patches for pain management. Approximately 5 hours after initiation of therapy, one of the patches could not be found and was replaced. Approximately 16 hours after beginning therapy, the patient was found apneic, pulseless, and cyanotic. A fentanyl patch was removed from the patient's oropharynx; however, despite resuscitative efforts, the patient died. Femoral blood fentanyl concentrations, obtained 0.5 hours and 2 hours post-mortem were 1.6 ng/mL and 14 ng/mL, respectively. It is suspected that the increased fentanyl concentration post-mortem may be due to either decreasing plasma pH associated with a decrease in protein binding and a subsequent increase in water solubility, redistribution, or collection or laboratory error (Moore et al, 2015).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Fentanyl is a pure opioid agonist with analgesic properties (Prod Info SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, 2012; Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2011; Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009; Prod Info ONSOLIS(TM) buccal, soluble film, 2009).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Therapeutic and toxic effects are mediated by different opioid receptors. Mu 1: Supraspinal and peripheral analgesia, sedation and euphoria. Mu 2: Spinal analgesia, respiratory depression, physical dependence, GI dysmotility, bradycardia and pruritus. Kappa 1: Spinal analgesia and miosis. Kappa 2: Dysphoria and psychotomimesis. Kappa 3: Supraspinal analgesia. Chronic opioid users develop tolerance to the analgesic and euphoric effects, but not to the respiratory depression effects (Nelson, 2006).
    B) RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION: Respiration, which is controlled mainly through medullary respiratory centers with peripheral input from chemoreceptors and other sources, is affected by opioids which produce inhibition at chemoreceptors via Mu (OP3) opioid receptors and in the medulla via mu and delta receptors. Tolerance develops more quickly to euphoria and other effects than to respiratory effects (White & Irvine, 1999). Serious and life-threatening hypoventilation may occur with fentanyl use. Hypoventilation may persist for many hours after transdermal patch removal; absorption may continue for 20 to 27 hours once removed (Prod Info DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, 2009).

Physical Characteristics

    A) FENTANYL: A highly lipophilic compound that is freely soluble in organic solvents and sparingly soluble in water (1:40) (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013).
    B) FENTANYL CITRATE: A white powder that is sparingly soluble in water (Prod Info Fentanyl Citrate IV, IM injection, 2008).

Ph

    A) FENTANYL CITRATE: 4 to 7.5 (Prod Info SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, 2012)

Molecular Weight

    1) ACETYL FENTANYL: 322.205 g/mol (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2013)
    2) FENTANYL: 336.5 (Prod Info FENTORA(R) oral tablets, 2013)
    3) FENTANYL CITRATE: 528.6 (Prod Info ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, 2014)
    4) FENTANYL HYDROCHLORIDE: 372.93 (Prod Info IONSYS(R) transdermal system, 2015)

General Bibliography

    1) AAP: Emergency drug doses for infants and children and naloxone use in newborns: clarification. AAP: Pediatrics 1989; 83:803.
    2) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    3) Addiego JE, Ridgway D, & Bleyer WA: The acute management of intrathecal methotrexate overdose: pharmacologic rationale and guidelines. J Pediatr 1981; 98(5):825-828.
    4) Algren DA, Monteilh CP, Punja M, et al: Fentanyl-associated Fatalities Among Illicit Drug Users in Wayne County, Michigan (July 2005-May 2006). J Med Toxicol 2013; 9(1):106-115.
    5) Algren JT & Algren CL: Sedation and analgesia for minor pediatric procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996; 12(6):435-441.
    6) Andresen H, Gullans A, Veselinovic M, et al: Fentanyl: toxic or therapeutic? Postmortem and antemortem blood concentrations after transdermal fentanyl application. J Anal Toxicol 2012; 36(3):182-194.
    7) Anon: FDA Talk Paper: FDA approves Actiq for marketing. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Rockville, MD, USA. 1998. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov.
    8) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    9) Arvanitis ML & Satonik RC: Transdermal fentanyl abuse and misuse (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20:58-59.
    10) Backberg M, Beck O, Jonsson KH, et al: Opioid intoxications involving butyrfentanyl, 4-fluorobutyrfentanyl, and fentanyl from the Swedish STRIDA project. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):609-617.
    11) Baraka A: Fentanyl-induced laryngospasm following tracheal extubation in a child (letter). Anaesthesia 1995; 50:375.
    12) Barrueto F Jr, Howland MA, & Hoffman RS: The fentanyl tea bag. Vet Human Toxicol 2004; 46:30-31.
    13) Bauman BH & McManus JG Jr: Pediatric pain management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005; 23(2):393-414, ix.
    14) Behrman A & Goertemoeller S: A sticky situation: toxicity of clonidine and fentanyl transdermal patches in pediatrics. J Emerg Nurs 2007; 33(3):290-293.
    15) Berde CB & Sethna NF: Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(14):1094-1103.
    16) Binstock W , Rubin R , Bachman C , et al: The effect of premedication with OTFC, with or without ondansetron, on postoperative agitation, and nausea and vomiting in pediatric ambulatory patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14(9):759-767.
    17) Blaney SM, Poplack DG, Godwin K, et al: Effect of body position on ventricular CSF methotrexate concentration following intralumbar administration. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(1):177-179.
    18) Blinick G, Jerez E, & Wallach RC: Methadone maintenance, pregnancy, and progeny. JAMA 1973; 225:477-479.
    19) Boddiger D: Fentanyl-laced street drugs "kill hundreds". Lancet 2006; 368(9535):569-570.
    20) Brice JEH, Moreland TA, Parija AC, et al: Plasma naloxone levels in the newborn after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8:412P-413P.
    21) Brislin RP & Rose JB: Pediatric acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2005; 23(4):789-814, x.
    22) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    23) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    24) Carrie LE, O'Sullivan GM, & Seegobin R: Epidural fentanyl in labour. Anaesthesia 1981; 36:965-969.
    25) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    26) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Acetyl fentanyl overdose fatalities--Rhode Island, March-May 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013a; 62(34):703-704.
    27) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Recommendations for laboratory testing for acetyl fentanyl and patient evaluation and treatment for overdose with synthetic opioids: HAN00350. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Atlanta, GA. 2013. Available from URL: http://emergency.cdc.gov/HAN/han00350.asp. As accessed 2013-06-26.
    28) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention : Nonpharmaceutical fentanyl-related deaths--multiple states, April 2005-March 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57(29):793-796.
    29) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    30) Chaturvedi AK, Rao NGS, & Baird JR: A death due to self-administered fentanyl. J Anal Toxicol 1990; 14:385-387.
    31) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    32) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    33) Colak S, Erdogan MO, Afacan MA, et al: Neuropsychiatric side effects due to a transdermal fentanyl patch: hallucinations. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33(3):477.e1-477.e2.
    34) Cole J, Shepherd M, & Young P: Intranasal fentanyl in 1-3-year-olds: a prospective study of the effectiveness of intranasal fentanyl as acute analgesia. Emerg Med Australas 2009; 21(5):395-400.
    35) Coon TP, Miller M, Kaylor D, et al: Rectal insertion of fentanyl patches: a new route of toxicity. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46(5):473-.
    36) Crellin D , Ling RX , & Babl FE : Does the standard intravenous solution of fentanyl (50 microg/mL) administered intranasally have analgesic efficacy?. Emerg Med Australas 2010; 22(1):62-67.
    37) D'Orazio JL & Fischel JA: Recurrent respiratory depression associated with fentanyl transdermal patch gel reservoir ingestion. J Emerg Med 2012; 42(5):543-548.
    38) Darnell CM , Thompson J , Stromberg D , et al: Effect of low-dose naloxone infusion on fentanyl requirements in critically ill children. Pediatrics 2008; 121(5):e1363-e1371.
    39) Dawson P: Cardiac arrest following epidural overdose. Anaesth Intensive Care 1995; 23(5):650-655.
    40) Dettmeyer R, Schmidt P, & Musshoff F: Pulmonary edema in fatal heroin overdose: immunohistological investigations with IgE, collagen IV and laminin - no increase of defects of alveolar-capillary membranes. Forensic Sci Intl 2000; 110:87-96.
    41) Doris MK & Sandilands EA: Life-threatening opioid toxicity from a fentanyl patch applied to eczematous skin. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015:bcr2014208945.
    42) Drummer OH: Recent trends in narcotic deaths. Ther Drug Monit 2005; 27(6):738-740.
    43) Edinboro LE, Poklis A, Trautman D, et al: Fatal fentanyl intoxication following excessive transdermal application. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(4):741-743.
    44) Epstein RH, Mendel HG, Witkowski TA, et al: The safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for preoperative sedation in young children. Anesth Analg 1996; 83(6):1200-1205.
    45) Evans LE, Swainson CP, & Roscoe P: Treatment of drug overdosage with naloxone, a specific narcotic antagonist. Lancet 1973; 1:452-455.
    46) Finn M & Harris D: Intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in the paediatric emergency department. Emerg Med J 2010; 27(4):300-301.
    47) Firestone M, Goldman B, & Fischer B: Fentanyl use among street drug users in Toronto, Canada: behavioural dynamics and public health implications. Int J Drug Policy 2009; 20(1):90-92.
    48) Fischer CG & Cook DR: The respiratory and narcotic antagonistic effects of naloxone in infants. Anesth Analg 1974; 53:849-852.
    49) Flannagan LM, Butts JD, & Anderson WH: Fentanyl patches left on dead bodies -- potential source of drug for abusers. J Forensic Sci 1996; 41(2):320-321.
    50) Friesen RH , Carpenter E , Madigan CK , et al: Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for preanaesthetic medication of paediatric cardiac surgery patients. Paediatr Anaesth 1995; 5(1):29-33.
    51) Frolich M, Giannotti A, & Modell JH: Opioid overdose in a patient using a fentanyl patch during treatment with a warming blanket. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:647-648.
    52) Gal TJ: Naloxone reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45:66-71.
    53) Gardner-Nix J: Caregiver toxicity from transdermal fentanyl (letter). J Pain Symptom Management 2001; 21:447-448.
    54) Garner EG, Smith CV, & Rayburn WF: Maternal respiratory arrest associated with intravenous fentanyl use during labor. A case report. J Reprod Med 1994; 39:818-820.
    55) Gaultieri JF, Roe SJ, & Schmidt CL: Lethal consequences following oral abuse of a fentanyl transdermal patch (abstract). EAPCCT XX International Congress, Amsterdam, Netherlands 2000; (not listed):(not listed).
    56) Gibbs J, Newson T, & Williams J: Naloxone hazard in infant of opioid abuser (letter). Lancet 1989; 2:159-160.
    57) Glassroth J, Adams GD, & Schnoll S: The impact of substance abuse on the respiratory system. Chest 1987; 91:596-602.
    58) Godambe SA, Elliot V, Matheny D, et al: Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 2003; 112(1 Pt 1):116-123.
    59) Gosselin S & Isbister GK: Re: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(8):609-610.
    60) Greco C & Berde C: Pain management for the hospitalized pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin North Am 2005; 52(4):995-1027.
    61) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    62) Hardwick WE, King WD, & Palmisano PA: Respiratory depression in a child unintentionally exposed to transdermal fentanyl patch. South Med J 1997; 90:962-964.
    63) Hartwig S, Roth B, & Theisohn M: Clinical experience with continuous intravenous sedation using midazolam and fentanyl in the paediatric intensive care unit. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150(11):784-788.
    64) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    65) Helander A, Backberg M, & Beck O: Intoxications involving the fentanyl analogs acetylfentanyl, 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl: results from the Swedish STRIDA project. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2016; Epub:1-9.
    66) Henderson GL: Fentanyl-related deaths: demographics, circumstances, and toxicology of 112 cases. J Forensic Sci 1991; 36(2):422-433.
    67) Hillman AD, Witenko CJ, Sultan SM, et al: Serotonin syndrome caused by fentanyl and methadone in a burn injury. Pharmacotherapy 2015; 35(1):112-117.
    68) Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, & Luo JS: The empiric use of naloxone in patients with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:246-252.
    69) Holdgate A, Cao A, & Lo KM: The implementation of intranasal fentanyl for children in a mixed adult and pediatric emergency department reduces time to analgesic administration. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17(2):214-217.
    70) Howland MA & Nelson LS: Opioid Antagonists. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 2011, pp 579-585.
    71) Howland MA: Antidotes in Depth. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, Hoffman RS, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006a, pp 826-828.
    72) Howland MA: Opioid Antagonists. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    73) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    74) Jaffe JH & Martin WR: Opioid analgesics and antagonists. Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 8th ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp 485-521.
    75) Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, & Griffith ID: Human pharmacology and abuse potential of analgesic buprenorphine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 35:501-516.
    76) Kaiser KG & Bainton CR: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose by aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:475-477.
    77) Katz R & Kelly HW: Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children. Crit Care Med 1993; 21(7):995-1000.
    78) Kelly AM & Koutsogiannis Z: Intranasal naloxone for life threatening opioid toxicity. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:375.
    79) Kennedy RM, Porter FL, Miller JP, et al: Comparison of fentanyl/midazolam with ketamine/midazolam for pediatric orthopedic emergencies.. Pediatrics 1998; 102(4 Pt 1):956-63.
    80) Kerr D , Kelly AM , Dietze P , et al: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose. Addiction 2009; 104(12):2067-2074.
    81) Klein EJ, Diekema DS, Paris CA, et al: A randomized, clinical trial of oral midazolam plus placebo versus oral midazolam plus oral transmucosal fentanyl for sedation during laceration repair.. Pediatrics 2002; 109:894-897.
    82) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    83) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    84) Koska AJ, Romagnoli A, & Kramer WG: Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on fentanyl distribution and elimination. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 29:100-105.
    85) Kramer C & Tawney M: A fatal overdose of transdermally administered fentanyl. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1998; 98(7):385-386.
    86) Krauss B & Green SM: Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367(9512):766-780.
    87) Krinsky CS, Lathrop SL, Crossey M, et al: A toxicology-based review of fentanyl-related deaths in New Mexico (1986-2007). Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2011; 32(4):347-351.
    88) Kronstrand R, Druid H, & Holmgren P: A cluster of fentanyl-related deaths among drug addicts in Sweden. Forensic Sci Int 1997; 88:185-195.
    89) Kuhlman JJ Jr, McCaulley R, Valouch TJ, et al: Fentanyl use, misuse, and abuse: a summary of 23 postmortem cases. J Analyt Toxicol 2003; 27:499-504.
    90) Kumar M & Paes B: Epidural opioid analgesia and neonatal respiratory depression. J Perinatol 2003; 23(5):425-7.
    91) Kuzma PJ, Kline MD, & Starnatos JM: Acute toxic delirium: an uncommon reaction to transdermal fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:869-871.
    92) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    93) Levine B, Goodin JC, & Caplan YH: A fentanyl fatality involving midazolam. Forensic Sci Int 1990; 45:247-251.
    94) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    95) Lyttle MD, Verma S, & Isaac R: Transdermal fentanyl in deliberate overdose in pediatrics. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28(5):463-464.
    96) Mahar PJ, Rana JA, Kennedy CS, et al: A randomized clinical trial of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus intravenous morphine sulfate for initial control of pain in children with extremity injuries. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23(8):544-548.
    97) Maino P, Koetsier E, & Perez RS: Fentanyl overdose caused by malfunction of SynchroMed II intrathecal pump: two case reports. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2014; 39(5):434-437.
    98) Maio RF, Gaukel B, & Freeman B: Intralingual naloxone injection for narcotic-induced respiratory depression. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:572-573.
    99) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    100) Marquardt KA & Tharratt RS: Inhalation abuse of fentanyl patch. Clin Tox 1994; 32:75-78.
    101) Matejczyk RJ: Fentanyl related overdose. J Anal Toxicol 1988; 12:236-238.
    102) McCann B, Hunter R, & McCann J: Cocaine/heroin induced rhabdomyolysis and ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:264-265.
    103) McPherson C , Haslam M , Pineda R , et al: Brain Injury and Development in Preterm Infants Exposed to Fentanyl. Ann Pharmacother 2015; 49(12):1291-1297.
    104) Mencia SB, Lopez-Herce JC, & Freddi N: Analgesia and sedation in children: practical approach for the most frequent situations. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007; 83(2 Suppl):S71-S82.
    105) Mets B & James MFM: Another complicatin of opiate-induced chest wall rigidity (letter). SAMJ 1992; 81:385-386.
    106) Milone MC: Laboratory testing for prescription opioids. J Med Toxicol 2012; 8(4):408-416.
    107) Mofenson HC & Caraccio TR: Continuous infusion of intravenous naloxone (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:374-375.
    108) Moore PW, Palmer RB, & Donovan JW: Fatal fentanyl patch misuse in a hospitalized patient with a postmortem increase in fentanyl blood concentration. J Forensic Sci 2015; 60(1):243-246.
    109) Mrvos R, Feuchter AC, Katz KD, et al: Whole fentanyl patch ingestion: a multi-center case series. J Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub.
    110) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    111) Nave R, Schmitt H, & Popper L: Faster absorption and higher systemic bioavailability of intranasal fentanyl spray compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy subjects. Drug Deliv 2013; 20(5):216-223.
    112) Nelson L: Opioids. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 8th ed., 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006, pp -.
    113) Nelson LS: Opioids, in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 6th ed, Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT, 1998.
    114) Newshan G: Heat-related toxicity with the fentanyl transdermal patch (letter). J Pain Symptom Manage 1998; 16:277-278.
    115) Nickless JR, Le Lait MC, West NA, et al: Non-Dermal Routes Used in Fentanyl Patch Intentional Exposures. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):702.
    116) None Listed: Fentanyl patches: preventable overdose. Prescrire Int 2010; 19(105):22-25.
    117) None Listed: Oral transmucosal fentanyl: new preparation. For breakthrough cancer pain when morphine fails. Prescrire Int 2002; 11(60):106-107.
    118) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    119) Peer CJ, Shakleya DM, Younis IR, et al: Direct-injection mass spectrometric method for the rapid identification of fentanyl and norfentanyl in postmortem urine of six drug-overdose cases. J Anal Toxicol 2007; 31(8):515-521.
    120) Penn RD & Kroin JS: Treatment of intrathecal morphine overdose. J Neurosurg 1995; 82(1):147-148.
    121) Perrone J & DeRoos F: The new high. EMS crews confronted with heroin-fentanyl ODs. JEMS 2007; 32(1):28-29.
    122) Pizon AF & Brooks DE: Fentanyl patch abuse: naloxone complications and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue. Vet Human Toxicol 2004; 46:256-257.
    123) Playfor S, Jenkins I, Boyles C, et al: Consensus guidelines on sedation and analgesia in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(8):1125-1136.
    124) Poklis A: Fentanyl: a review for clinical and analytical toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33(5):439-447.
    125) Product Information: ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, fentanyl sublingual tablets. Galena Biopharma, Inc. (per FDA), Portland, OR, 2014.
    126) Product Information: ABSTRAL(R) sublingual tablets, fentanyl sublingual tablets. ProStrakan, Inc. (per FDA), Bedminster, NJ, 2011.
    127) Product Information: ACTIQ(R) oral transmucosal lozenge, fentanyl citrate oral transmucosal lozenge. Cephalon, Inc. (Per FDA), Frazer, PA, 2011.
    128) Product Information: ACTIQ(R) oral transumcosal lozenge, fentanyl citrate oral transumcosal lozenge. Cephalon, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, 2009.
    129) Product Information: DURAGESIC(R) Transdermal patches, Fentanyl Transdermal patches. PriCara, Raritan, NJ, 2009.
    130) Product Information: DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system patch, fentanyl transdermal system patch. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2014.
    131) Product Information: DURAGESIC(R) transdermal system, fentanyl transdermal system. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Titusville, NJ, 2012.
    132) Product Information: EVZIO(TM) injection solution, naloxone HCl injection solution. Kaleo, Inc. (per FDA), Richmond, VA, 2014.
    133) Product Information: FENTORA(R) oral tablets, fentanyl buccal oral tablets. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (per FDA), North Wales, PA, 2013.
    134) Product Information: Fentanyl Citrate IV, IM injection, Fentanyl Citrate IV, IM injection. Hospira, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    135) Product Information: IONSYS(R) transdermal system, fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system. The Medicines Company (per FDA), Parsippany, NJ, 2015.
    136) Product Information: Lazanda nasal spray, fentanyl nasal spray. Archimedes Pharma US Inc. (per FDA), Bedminster, NJ, 2011.
    137) Product Information: Lazanda(R) nasal spray, fentanyl citrate nasal spray. Archimedes Pharma US Inc. (per FDA), Bedminster, NJ, 2012.
    138) Product Information: NARCAN(R) nasal spray, naloxone HCl nasal spray. Adapt Pharma (per FDA), Radnor, PA, 2015.
    139) Product Information: ONSOLIS(R) buccal soluble film, fentanyl buccal soluble film. Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), Somerset, NJ, 2011.
    140) Product Information: ONSOLIS(TM) buccal, soluble film, fentanyl buccal, soluble film. Biodelivery Services International, Raleigh, NC, 2009.
    141) Product Information: REVEX(R) injection, nalmefene hcl injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, 2006.
    142) Product Information: SUBLIMAZE(R) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, fentanyl citrate intravenous injection, intramuscular injection. Akorn, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2012.
    143) Product Information: SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, fentanyl sublingual spray. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (per DailyMed), Phoenix, AZ, 2012.
    144) Product Information: SUBSYS(R) sublingual spray, fentanyl sublingual spray. Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (per FDA), Phoenix, AZ, 2013.
    145) Product Information: VIVITROL(TM) extended-release injectable suspension, naltrexone extended-release injectable suspension. Cephalon,Inc, Frazer, PA, 2006.
    146) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    147) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    148) Product Information: fentanyl citrate injection, fentanyl citrate injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2005.
    149) Product Information: fentanyl citrate oral lozenge, fentanyl citrate oral lozenge. Par Pharmaceutical (per DailyMed), Spring Valley, NY, 2014.
    150) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    151) Product Information: naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution, naloxone HCl IV, IM, subcutaneous injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    152) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    153) Purucker M & Swann W: Potential for Duragesic patch abuse (letter). Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35:314.
    154) Redfern N: Dihydrocodeine overdose treated with naloxone infusion. Br Med J 1983; 287:751-752.
    155) Reeves MD & Ginifer CJ: Fatal intravenous misuse of transdermal fentanyl. Med J Aust 2002; 177(10):552-553.
    156) Robert R, Brack A, Blakeney P, et al: A double-blind study of the analgesic efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and oral morphine in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing change and tubbing. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003; 24(6):351-355.
    157) Rose PG, Macfee MS, & Boswell MV: Fentanyl transdermal system overdose secondary to cutaneous hyperthermia. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:390-391.
    158) Russell AW: Inadvertent epidural overdose (letter). Anesthesia Int Care 1994; 22:501-502.
    159) Rutili A, Maggiani M, Bertelloni C, et al: Persistent overdose caused by a very small dose of intrathecal morphine in an elderly patient undergoing vaginal hysterectomy: a case report. Minerva Anestesiol 2007; 73(7-8):433-436.
    160) Sachdeva DK & Stadnyk JM: Are one or two dangerous? Opioid exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 2005; 29(1):77-84.
    161) Safwat AM & Daniel D: Grand mal seizure after fentanyl administration. Anesthesiology 1983; 59:78.
    162) Schechter NL, Weisman SJ, Rosenblum M, et al: The use of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for painful procedures in children. Pediatrics 1995; 95(3):335-339.
    163) Schneir AB, Offerman SR, & Clark RF: Poisoning from the application of a scrotal transdermal fentanyl patch (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:487-488.
    164) Schumann H, Erickson T, Thompson TM, et al: Fentanyl epidemic in Chicago, Illinois and surrounding Cook County. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(6):501-506.
    165) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    166) Soto J, Sacristan JA, & Alsar MJ: Pulmonary oedema due to fentanyl?. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:913-914.
    167) Souders C, Branton T, & Wax P: Apnea from fentanyl patch smoking (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:536.
    168) Sporer KA & Dorn E: Heroin-related noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Chest 2001; 120:1628-1632.
    169) Sporer KA, Firestone J, & Isaacs SM: Out-of-hospital treatment of opioid overdoses in an urban setting. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3:660-667.
    170) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2010; 14(2):162-168.
    171) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    172) Stoukides CA & Stegman M: Diffuse rash associated with transdermal fentanyl (letter). Clin Pharm 1992; 11:222.
    173) Streisand JB, Varvel JR, & Stanski DR: Absorption and bioavailability of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. Anaesthesiology 1991; 75:223-229.
    174) Sutlovic D & Definis-Gojanovic M: Suicide by fentanyl. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2007; 58(3):317-321.
    175) Tandberg D & Abercrombie D: Treatment of heroin overdose with endotracheal naloxone. Ann Emerg Med 1982; 11:443-445.
    176) Tenenbein M: Continuous naloxone infusion for opiate poisoning in infancy. J Pediatr 1984; 105:645-648.
    177) Teske J, Weller JP, Larsch K, et al: Fatal outcome in a child after ingestion of a transdermal fentanyl patch. Int J Legal Med 2007; 121(2):147-151.
    178) Tharp AM, Winecker RE, & Winston DC: Fatal intravenous fentanyl abuse: four cases involving extraction of fentanyl from transdermal patches. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2004; 25(2):178-181.
    179) Thompson JG, Baker AM, Bracey AH, et al: Fentanyl concentrations in 23 postmortem cases from the hennepin county medical examiner's office. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52(4):978-981.
    180) Umans JG & Szeto HH: Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:441-444.
    181) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    182) VandenHoek TL , Morrison LJ , Shuster M , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    183) Wanger K, Brough L, & Macmillan I: Intravenous vs subcutaneous naloxone for out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:293-299.
    184) Warner-Smith M, Darke S, & Lynskey M: Heroin overdose: causes and consequences (review). Addiction 2001; 96:1113-1125.
    185) Watson WA, Steele MT, & Muelleman RL: Opioid toxicity recurrence after an initial response to naloxone. Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:11-17.
    186) Weber JM, Tataris KL, Hoffman JD, et al: Can nebulized naloxone be used safely and effectively by emergency medical services for suspected opioid overdose?. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16(2):289-292.
    187) Weightman WM: Respiratory arrest during epidural infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1991; 19:282-284.
    188) Welles B, Belfrage P, & de Chateau P: Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:617-619.
    189) Wells S, Williamson M, & Hooker D: Fentanyl-induced chest wall rigidity in a neonate: a case report. Heart & Lung 1994; 23:196-198.
    190) Wheeler M, Birmingham PK, Dsida RM, et al: Uptake pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl Oralet in children scheduled for central venous access removal: implications for the timing of initiating painful procedures. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12(7):594-599.
    191) White JM & Irvine RJ: Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose (review). Addiction 1999; 94:961-972.
    192) Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, & Rosen M: Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Part I. Br Med J 1977; 2:228-229.
    193) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    194) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    195) Woodall KL, Martin TL, & McLellan BA: Oral abuse of fentanyl patches (Duragesic): seven case reports. J Forensic Sci 2008; 53(1):222-225.
    196) Zuckerman M, Weisberg SN, & Boyer EW: Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone. Prehosp Emerg Care 2014; 18(4):550-554.
    197) Zuspan GP, Gumpel JA, & Mejia-Zelaya A: Fetal stress from methadone withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:43-46.