MOBILE VIEW  | 

ETOPOSIDE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Etoposide, a semisynthetic derivative of podophyllotoxin, is an antineoplastic agent.

Specific Substances

    1) BMY-40481
    2) EPEG
    3) Etoposide phosphate
    4) Etoposidi
    5) Etoposidum
    6) Etopozid
    7) Etopozidas
    8) NSC-141540
    9) VP-16
    10) VP-16-213
    11) CAS 33419-42-0 (Etoposide)
    12) CAS 117091-64-2 (Etoposide phosphate)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C29H32O13

Available Forms Sources

    A) SOURCES
    1) Etoposide is available in the United States as 100 mg single-dose vials for injection and 50 mg liquid-filled capsules for oral use (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    B) USES
    1) Etoposide is used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents to treat patients with refractory testicular tumors and small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006). It has also been used in a variety of other cancers, including neuroblastoma, leukemia, lymphoma, gastric, liver, and endometrial cancers.

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Etoposide is approved for use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents to treat patients with refractory testicular tumors and small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment). It has also been used in a variety of other cancers, including neuroblastoma, leukemia, lymphoma, gastric, liver, and endometrial cancers.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent that interferes with cell division by interacting with DNA-topoisomerase II, or by free radical formation, resulting in DNA strand breaks. It also affects the G2 portion of the mammalian cell cycle. At high concentrations, etoposide causes cell lysis during the mitosis phase and at low concentrations, it inhibits cells from entering prophase.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: At high concentrations (10 mcg/mL), etoposide causes cell lysis during the mitosis phase. Overdose effects are seen primarily in rapidly dividing cells (ie, bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Acute etoposide poisoning is rare. The incidence of etoposide toxicity during therapeutic use varies depending on the dosage and the duration of therapy.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Hypotension may occur following a rapid infusion and may respond to slowing the infusion rate. It may also be associated with hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. Hypertension and angina have also been reported; however, the causal relationship to etoposide is not clear.
    2) DERMAL: Rash, urticaria and/or pruritus have been infrequently reported. Erythema and desquamation, extravasation/phlebitis, alopecia, onycholysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis have also occurred following therapeutic use of etoposide.
    3) GASTROINTESTINAL: Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia, and taste alteration may occur. Severe esophagitis has also been reported.
    4) HEMATOLOGICAL: Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21, but may be delayed.
    5) HEPATIC: Hepatitis, hepatocellular necrosis, hyperammonemia, hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, and elevated hepatic enzymes have been reported in patients receiving high-doses of etoposide.
    6) IMMUNOLOGIC: Anaphylactic-type reactions have been reported.
    7) NEUROLOGIC: Asthenia/malaise, dizziness, and peripheral neuropathies have been reported. Cerebral edema due to a capillary leak syndrome has been reported in patients after receiving therapeutic doses of etoposide. Seizures, occasionally associated with allergic reactions, have been reported during clinical trials.
    8) RESPIRATORY: Dyspnea, apnea, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary fibrosis have been reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Overdose data are limited. Effects are anticipated to be similar to adverse effects reported during therapeutic use. In one case of an overdose (4900 mg oral etoposide over 25 days), the patient presented with fatigue, fever, cough, diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. At 57 months follow-up, the main complications were myelosuppression and immunosuppression.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Myelosuppression (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and mucositis are likely to develop and may be severe.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Chills and/or fever have been reported in patients receiving etoposide.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) The manufacturer has classified etoposide as FDA pregnancy category D. Although no teratogenic effects have been associated with etoposide (monotherapy) use during human pregnancy, teratogenic effects have been observed in animals administered etoposide. Myelosuppression has been reported in infants following maternal use of etoposide.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Etoposide may be carcinogenic by causing secondary leukemia. Secondary leukemia occurred in 2 of 337 patients receiving conventional doses of etoposide for at least 2 years in a review of 538 patient records.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs, serum electrolytes, renal function and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    B) Clinically evaluate patients for the development of mucositis.
    C) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. After therapeutic dosing, nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21 but may be delayed. Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    D) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat persistent nausea and vomiting with several antiemetics of different classes. Treat mild hypotension with IV fluids. Administer colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) as these patients are at risk for severe neutropenia.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat severe hypotension with intravenous fluids and vasopressors. Administer colony stimulating factors (filgrastim or sargramostim) as these patients are at risk for severe neutropenia. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia, or hemorrhage. Severe nausea and vomiting may respond to a combination of agents from different drug classes.
    C) INTRATHECAL INJECTION
    1) There are no published reports of therapy for an intrathecal etoposide overdose. This following information was derived from experience with other antineoplastics. Keep the patient upright if possible. Immediately drain at least 20 mL CSF; drainage of up to 70 mL has been tolerated in adults. Follow with CSF exchange (remove serial 20 mL aliquots CSF and replace with equivalent volumes of warmed, preservative free normal saline or lactated ringers). Consult a neurosurgeon for placement of a ventricular catheter and begin ventriculolumbar perfusion (infuse warmed preservative free normal saline or LR through ventricular catheter, drain fluid from lumbar catheter; typical volumes 80 to 150 mL/hr for 18 to 24 hours). Albumin 5% or fresh frozen plasma (25 mL FFP/L NS or LR) may also be useful for perfusion because of etoposide's high protein binding. Dexamethasone 4 mg IV every 6 hours to prevent arachnoiditis.
    D) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Administer activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and is able to maintain airway.
    2) HOSPITAL: Administer activated charcoal if the overdose is recent, the patient is not vomiting, and is able to maintain airway.
    E) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may be required in patients with severe respiratory symptoms or acute allergic reactions.
    F) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    G) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Administer colony stimulating factors following a significant overdose as these patients are at risk for severe neutropenia. Filgrastim: 5 mcg/kg/day IV or subQ. Sargramostim: 250 mcg/m(2)/day IV over 4 hours. Monitor CBC with differential and platelet count daily for evidence of bone marrow suppression until recovery has occurred. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage. Patients with severe neutropenia should be in protective isolation. Transfer to a bone marrow transplant center should be considered.
    H) NEUTROPENIA
    1) Prophylactic therapy with a fluoroquinolone should be considered in high risk patients with expected prolonged (more than 7 days), and profound neutropenia (ANC 100 cells/mm(3) or less).
    I) FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
    1) If fever (38.3 C) develops during the neutropenic phase (ANC 500 cells/mm(3) or less), cultures should be obtained and empiric antibiotics started. HIGH RISK PATIENT (anticipated neutropenia of 7 days or more; unstable; significant comorbidities): IV monotherapy with either piperacillin-tazobactam; a carbapenem (meropenem or imipenem-cilastatin); or an antipseudomonal beta-lactam agent (eg, ceftazidime or cefepime). LOW RISK PATIENT (anticipated neutropenia of less than 7 days; clinically stable; no comorbidities): oral ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate.
    J) HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION
    1) MILD/MODERATE: Antihistamines with or without inhaled beta agonists, corticosteroids or epinephrine. SEVERE: Oxygen, aggressive airway management, antihistamines, epinephrine, corticosteroids, ECG monitoring, and IV fluids.
    K) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) Treat hypotension with intravenous fluids; if hypotension persists, administer vasopressors.
    L) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) Treat severe nausea and vomiting with agents from several different classes. For example: dopamine (D2) receptor antagonists (eg, metoclopramide), phenothiazines (eg, prochlorperazine, promethazine), 5-HT3 serotonin antagonists (eg, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron), benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam), corticosteroids (eg, dexamethasone), and antipsychotics (eg, haloperidol).
    M) STOMATITIS/MUCOSITIS
    1) Treat mild mucositis with bland oral rinses with 0.9% saline, sodium bicarbonate, and water. For moderate cases with pain, consider adding a topical anesthetic (eg, lidocaine, benzocaine, dyclonine, diphenhydramine, or doxepin). Treat moderate to severe mucositis with topical anesthetics and systemic analgesics. Patients with mucositis and moderate xerostomia may receive sialagogues (eg, sugarless candy/mints, pilocarpine/cevimeline, or bethanechol) and topical fluorides to stimulate salivary gland function. Consider prophylactic antiviral and antifungal agents to prevent infections. Topical oral antimicrobial mouthwashes, rinses, pastilles, or lozenges may be used to decrease the risk of infection. Palifermin is indicated to reduce the incidence and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving myelotoxic therapy requiring hematopoietic stem cell support. In patients with an etoposide overdose in whom neutropenia and mucositis would be anticipated, administer palifermin 60 mcg/kg/day IV bolus injection starting 24 hours after the overdose for 3 consecutive days.
    N) EXTRAVASATION INJURY
    1) Infiltration with etoposide phosphate may cause local swelling, pain, cellulitis and necrosis. If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion. Disconnect the IV tubing, but leave the cannula or needle in place. Attempt to aspirate the extravasated drug from the needle or cannula. If possible, withdraw 3 to 5 mL of blood and/or fluids through the needle/cannula. Elevate the affected area. Immediately apply warm packs for 15 to 20 minutes at least 4 times daily to disperse and dilute the agent. Monitor site closely to avoid tissue injury due to heat application. Cooling may increase the risk of etoposide crystallization. Administer analgesia for severe pain. If pain persists, there is concern for compartment syndrome, or injury is apparent, an early surgical consult should be considered. Close observation of the extravasated area is suggested. If tissue sloughing, necrosis or blistering occurs, treat as a chemical burn (ie, antiseptic dressings, silver sulfadiazine, antibiotics when applicable). Surgical or enzymatic debridement may be required. Risk of infection is increased in chemotherapy patients with reduced neutrophil count following extravasation. Consider culturing any open wounds. Monitor the site for the development of cellulitis, which may require antibiotic therapy.
    O) PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
    1) Peripheral neurotoxicity should be anticipated in overdose. Monitor and treat symptoms as indicated.
    P) DYSTONIA
    1) ADULT: Benztropine 1 to 2 mg IV or diphenhydramine 1 mg/kg/dose IV over 2 minutes. CHILD: Diphenhydramine 1 mg/kg/dose IV over 2 minutes (maximum: 5 mg/kg/day or 50 mg/m(2)/day).
    Q) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Dialysis is UNLIKELY to be of benefit due to high protein binding and large volume of distribution.
    R) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: There is no data to support home management.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with an etoposide overdose need to be admitted, as toxicity develops over several days. Patients should be closely monitored in an inpatient setting, with frequent monitoring of vital signs (every 4 hours for the first 24 hours), and daily monitoring of CBC with differential until bone marrow suppression is resolved.
    3) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult an oncologist, medical toxicologist and/or poison center for assistance in managing patients with an etoposide overdose. In addition, consultation with an infectious disease physician with expertise in the management of neutropenic patients with infections is strongly recommended.
    4) TRANSFER CRITERIA: Patients with large overdoses may benefit from early transfer to a cancer treatment or bone marrow transplant center.
    S) PITFALLS
    1) Symptoms of overdose are similar to reported side effects of the medication. Early symptoms of overdose may be delayed or not evident (ie, particularly myelosuppression), so reliable follow-up is imperative. Patients taking etoposide may have severe co-morbidities and may be receiving other drugs that may produce synergistic effects (ie, myelosuppression, neurotoxicity).
    T) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Bioavailability of oral solution is 67% +/- 17%; protein binding: 97%; Vd: 18 L to 29 L. Etoposide has a biphasic distribution with the distribution half-life of 1.5 hours. Hepatic metabolism; P450 CYP3A4; metabolites formed by opening of the lactone ring; glucuronide and/or sulfate conjugates; O-demethylation. Renal excretion: 56%, 45% unchanged; fecal: 44% Elimination half-life: 4 to 11 hours.
    U) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Includes other agents that may cause myelosuppression.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    0.4.6) PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) Refer to "ORAL OVERVIEW AND MAIN SECTIONS" for specific information.
    B) INTRATHECAL INJECTION
    1) There are no published reports of therapy for an intrathecal etoposide overdose. This following information was derived from experience with other antineoplastics. Keep the patient upright if possible. Immediately drain at least 20 mL CSF; drainage of up to 70 mL has been tolerated in adults. Follow with CSF exchange (remove serial 20 mL aliquots CSF and replace with equivalent volumes of warmed, preservative free normal saline or lactated ringers). Consult a neurosurgeon for placement of a ventricular catheter and begin ventriculolumbar perfusion (infuse warmed preservative free normal saline or LR through ventricular catheter, drain fluid from lumbar catheter; typical volumes 80 to 150 mL/hr for 18 to 24 hours). Albumin 5% or fresh frozen plasma (25 mL FFP/L NS or LR) may also be useful for perfusion because of etoposide's high protein binding. Dexamethasone 4 mg IV every 6 hours to prevent arachnoiditis.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Overdose data are limited. In one case of an overdose (4900 mg oral etoposide over 25 days), the patient presented with fatigue, fever, cough and diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. HIGH-DOSE THERAPY: Elderly patients tolerated oral doses of 800 mg/m(2) with the total dose divided over 5 consecutive days every 3 to 4 weeks for 6 cycles. In clinical studies, including phase I studies, etoposide was administered in doses ranging from 1.8 to 4.8 g/m(2). These doses were usually given in combination with other cytotoxic agents with stem cell support or bone marrow transplantation. Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity in these patients. Other reported effects included severe myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and hepatitis. Two patients developed toxic hepatitis after receiving high-dose etoposide therapy for germinal neoplasms. Each patient received a total cumulative dose of at least 6.8 g/m(2). Liver function abnormalities became clinically apparent approximately 21 days after the last dose of etoposide, and resolved spontaneously without sequelae over 12 weeks. CHILDREN: Etoposide has been administered to children with neuroblastoma as part of multi-agent chemotherapy at a dose of 780 mg/m(2) as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 hours.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULTS: TESTICULAR CANCER: range, 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1 to 5 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1, 3, and 5, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents; repeat at 3- to 4-wk intervals. SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: range, 35 mg/m(2)/day IV for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day IV for 5 days, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents; repeat at 3- to 4-wk intervals. Do not give by bolus IV injection. ORAL: 2 times the IV dose rounded to the nearest 50 mg (eg, 2 times 35 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days). CHILDREN: Safety and efficacy in children has not been established.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Etoposide is approved for use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents to treat patients with refractory testicular tumors and small cell lung cancer (first-line treatment). It has also been used in a variety of other cancers, including neuroblastoma, leukemia, lymphoma, gastric, liver, and endometrial cancers.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent that interferes with cell division by interacting with DNA-topoisomerase II, or by free radical formation, resulting in DNA strand breaks. It also affects the G2 portion of the mammalian cell cycle. At high concentrations, etoposide causes cell lysis during the mitosis phase and at low concentrations, it inhibits cells from entering prophase.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: At high concentrations (10 mcg/mL), etoposide causes cell lysis during the mitosis phase. Overdose effects are seen primarily in rapidly dividing cells (ie, bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract).
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Acute etoposide poisoning is rare. The incidence of etoposide toxicity during therapeutic use varies depending on the dosage and the duration of therapy.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Hypotension may occur following a rapid infusion and may respond to slowing the infusion rate. It may also be associated with hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. Hypertension and angina have also been reported; however, the causal relationship to etoposide is not clear.
    2) DERMAL: Rash, urticaria and/or pruritus have been infrequently reported. Erythema and desquamation, extravasation/phlebitis, alopecia, onycholysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis have also occurred following therapeutic use of etoposide.
    3) GASTROINTESTINAL: Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia, and taste alteration may occur. Severe esophagitis has also been reported.
    4) HEMATOLOGICAL: Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21, but may be delayed.
    5) HEPATIC: Hepatitis, hepatocellular necrosis, hyperammonemia, hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, and elevated hepatic enzymes have been reported in patients receiving high-doses of etoposide.
    6) IMMUNOLOGIC: Anaphylactic-type reactions have been reported.
    7) NEUROLOGIC: Asthenia/malaise, dizziness, and peripheral neuropathies have been reported. Cerebral edema due to a capillary leak syndrome has been reported in patients after receiving therapeutic doses of etoposide. Seizures, occasionally associated with allergic reactions, have been reported during clinical trials.
    8) RESPIRATORY: Dyspnea, apnea, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary fibrosis have been reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Overdose data are limited. Effects are anticipated to be similar to adverse effects reported during therapeutic use. In one case of an overdose (4900 mg oral etoposide over 25 days), the patient presented with fatigue, fever, cough, diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. At 57 months follow-up, the main complications were myelosuppression and immunosuppression.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Myelosuppression (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and mucositis are likely to develop and may be severe.

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In studies, nausea and vomiting developed in 31% to 43% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, nausea and/or vomiting occurred in 37% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). The severity is generally mild to moderate, with only 1% of patients requiring discontinuation of therapy (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    B) STOMATITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Stomatitis is a frequent occurrence during oral therapy with etoposide, either with capsules or ampule administration (Ryssel et al, 1977; Nissen et al, 1976; Brunner et al, 1976; Falkson et al, 1975). In clinical trials, mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity when high-doses of etoposide (1.8 to 4.8 g/m(2)) were used for bone marrow transplant (Fields et al, 1995a; Fields et al, 1994a; Ahmed et al, 1993; Barnett et al, 1993a; Gianni et al, 1992).
    b) In studies, stomatitis developed in 1% to 6% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    c) In clinical trials, mucositis occurred in 11% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    d) Severe mucositis or esophagitis has occurred in patients receiving higher than recommended doses. In one study, it contributed to the death in one patient (Van Echo et al, 1980).
    C) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In studies, diarrhea developed in 1% to 13% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, diarrhea occurred in 6% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    D) ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In studies, abdominal pain developed in 2% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, abdominal pain occurred in 7% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    E) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In studies, anorexia developed in 10% to 13% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, anorexia occurred in 16% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    F) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, constipation occurred in 8% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    G) TASTE SENSE ALTERED
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, taste alteration occurred in 6% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    H) DRUG-INDUCED ILEUS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) COMBINATION THERAPY: Paralytic ileus developed after treatment with etoposide and amsacrine. The condition did not respond to treatment with gastric suction and intravenous fluids. The patient died 18 days later (Kucuk & Apostol, 1985).
    I) NEUTROPENIC COLITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) COMBINATION THERAPY: Neutropenic colitis has been reported in a patient on multiple chemotherapeutic agents including etoposide (Kawai et al, 1998).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hepatitis, hepatocellular necrosis, hyperammonemia, hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, and elevated hepatic enzymes have been reported in patients receiving etoposide (Mitchell et al, 1988; Wolff, 1986; Johnson et al, 1983; Van Echo et al, 1980).
    b) In clinical trials, hepatotoxicity developed in approximately 3% of patients (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    c) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed toxic hepatitis after receiving high-dose etoposide therapy for germinal neoplasms. Each patient received a total cumulative dose of at least 6.8 grams/m(2). Liver function abnormalities became clinically apparent approximately 21 days after the last dose of etoposide, and resolved spontaneously without sequelae over 12 weeks (Johnson et al, 1983).
    d) Hepatic dysfunction occurred with hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, and thrombocytopenia in patients treated with carmustine and etoposide for high grade gliomas (Wolff, 1986).
    e) CASE SERIES: Three cases of hepatocellular necrosis have been reported following high doses (600 to 2400 mg/m2) of etoposide (Tran et al, 1991).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21, but may be delayed (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In one case of overdose (4900 mg orally over 25 days), myelosuppression (grade 1 to 2) was evident 57 months after exposure (Pawlicki et al, 1990).
    B) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% (less than 100,000/mm(3)) and 9% (less than 50,000/mm(3)) of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Myelosuppression with etoposide is dose-related and dose-limiting. The platelet nadir count occurs from day 10 to day 15 after therapy is initiated, with bone marrow recovery usually by day 21. Death associated with myelosuppression has been reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In studies, thrombocytopenia (less than 100,000 cells/mm(3)) developed in 22% to 41% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection. Severe thrombocytopenia (less than 50,000 cells/mm(3)) developed in 1% to 20% of patients (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    C) LEUKOPENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, leukopenia occurred in 91% (less than 4000/mm(3)) and 17% (less than 1000/mm(3)) of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Myelosuppression with etoposide is dose-related and dose-limiting. The leukocyte nadir count occurs from day 15 to day 22 after therapy is initiated, with bone marrow recovery usually by day 21. Death associated with myelosuppression has been reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In studies, leukopenia (less than 4000 WBC/mm3) developed in 60% to 91% of patients (n=2081) receiving etoposide orally or by injection. Severe leukopenia (less than 1000 WBC/mm3) developed in 3% to 17% of patients (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    D) NEUTROPENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, neutropenia occurred in 88% (less than 2000/mm(3)) and 37% (less than 500/mm(3)) of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Myelosuppression with etoposide is dose-related and dose-limiting. The granulocyte nadir count occurs from day 12 to day 19 after therapy is initiated, with bone marrow recovery usually by day 21. Death associated with myelosuppression has been reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    E) ANEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In studies, anemia developed in up to 33% of patients (n=2081) following etoposide use orally or by injection (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, anemia occurred in 72% (less than 11 g/dL) and 19% (less than 8 g/dL) of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Myelosuppression with etoposide is dose-related and dose-limiting. Bone marrow recovery is usually by day 21 after initiation of therapy. Death associated with myelosuppression has been reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Rash, urticaria and/or pruritus have been infrequently reported. A generalized pruritic erythematous maculopapular rash, consistent with perivasculitis, has also been reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, skin rashes from allergic reactions occurred in 3% of patients who received etoposide (n=245). The patients usually responded promptly to discontinuation of the infusion and supportive therapy (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    c) Four other cases of cutaneous eruptions were reported consistent with diffuse erythematous macules and papules. It occurred 5 to 9 days after etoposide therapy. Symptoms resolved spontaneously within 3 weeks (Yokel et al, 1987).
    B) FLUSHING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, facial flushing from an allergic reaction occurred in 2% of patients who received etoposide (n=245). The patients usually responded promptly to discontinuation of the infusion and supportive therapy (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    C) GENERALIZED EXFOLIATIVE DERMATITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Handfoot syndrome (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia) developed in one patient taking oral etoposide in doses of 100 to 200 mg 5 times a week. The patient presented with severe burning on palms and soles of feet with intense erythema, extensive desquamation and cracking of skin creases (Schey et al, 1992).
    D) EXTRAVASATION INJURY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, extravasation/phlebitis occurred in 5% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Infiltration with etoposide may cause local swelling, pain, cellulitis, and necrosis (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    E) NAIL FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Onycholysis of the finger and toenails have been described in several patients taking oral etoposide (Schey et al, 1992; Obermair et al, 1995).
    F) STEVENS-JOHNSON SYNDROME
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Stevens-Johnson syndrome has been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    G) LYELL'S TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS, SUBEPIDERMAL TYPE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Toxic epidermal necrolysis has been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: A patient developed sore throat and mild fever during the second course of etoposide chemotherapy. Four days after completion of the treatment, the patient presented with neck rash, mouth sores and a diffuse maculopapular rash. Skin biopsy revealed features of toxic epidermal necrolysis (Jameson & Solanki, 1983).
    H) ALOPECIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, alopecia occurred in 33% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98). Reversible alopecia that occasionally progressed to baldness occurred in up to 66% of patients (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    I) SKIN FINDING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Ultraviolet recall (the appearance of a sunburn-like reaction in a site of previous ultraviolet light exposure following administration of chemotherapy) occurred in a young adult, with recurrent large cell lymphoma, 12 days after receiving etoposide therapy; symptoms resolved within a week following symptomatic care (Williams et al, 1993).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE ALLERGIC REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Allergic reactions that include rash, urticaria, and/or pruritus have been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Cersosimo et al, 1989; Ogle & Kennedy, 1988).
    b) Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide were initially considered uncommon; however, an incidence of 33% to 51%, including some fatalities have been reported. Most cases have occurred in children or adolescents. Hypersensitivity reactions have included the following features: hypotension, hypertension, bronchospasm, chest tightness, dyspnea, fever, chills, tachycardia, facial flushing, or exanthema. Reactions to oral etoposide are reported less frequently than reactions to intravenous etoposide. Lowering the infusion rate may prevent a reaction. Although not clearly defined, the mechanism for hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide is likely nonimmunogenic. Evidence for this mechanism includes reactions with the first injection and continued use of etoposide without subsequent reactions at a lower infusion rate (Hoetelmans et al, 1996).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old woman with Hodgkin's disease exhibited an acute hypersensitivity reaction within 5 minutes of starting an etoposide infusion (406 mg in 500 mL normal saline). She recovered within an hour of stopping the infusion with supportive care. Two days later, the patient received etoposide with premedication and extensive monitoring following a test dose. Etoposide was well-tolerated, allowing the patient to complete the cycle with the intended doses on 3 consecutive days. The most likely explanation for this successful rechallenge was the use of the water-soluble prodrug that is devoid of polysorbate 80 (Bernstein & Troner, 1999).
    B) ANAPHYLACTOID REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, anaphylactic-type reactions (eg, chills, rigors, tachycardia, bronchospasm) occurred in 3% (7/245) of patients who received etoposide. The patients usually responded promptly to discontinuation of the infusion and supportive therapy; however, fatalities were reported (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    C) DISORDER OF IMMUNE FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: In one case of overdose (4900 mg orally over 25 days), immunosuppression grade 1-2 (reduction of T lymphocytes to 650 per mm(3)) was evident 57 months after exposure (Pawlicki et al, 1990).

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Chills and/or fever have been reported in patients receiving etoposide.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) CHILLS/FEVER: In clinical trials, chills and/or fever occurred in 24% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Transient hypotension has been reported in 1% to 2% of patients (n=2081) following rapid intravenous etoposide administration (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Cersosimo et al, 1989; Rozencweig et al, 1977; Cohen et al, 1977). Hypotension may also be associated with hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) In clinical trials, 8/151 patients had one or more episodes of hypotension after receiving etoposide. The infusion times ranged from 30 minutes to 3.5 hours, and etoposide causality was not determined. Among the patients who received a 5-minute bolus infusion, 1/63 experienced hypotension (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    B) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, 4/151 patients had one or more episodes of hypertension after receiving etoposide. The infusion times ranged from 30 minutes to 3.5 hours, and etoposide causality was not determined (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    C) ANGINA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Angina developed in a patient who was treated with etoposide, cisplatin, and bleomycin. Nitroglycerin resolved the angina and pretreatment with nifedipine prior to the next course prevented the angina from recurring (Rodriguez et al, 1995).
    D) MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Although unusual, chemotherapy protocols containing cisplatin, vinblastine, etoposide, and bleomycin in various combinations for the treatment of germ-cell tumors have been associated with severe myocardial events, both ischemia and/or infarction (Schwarzer et al, 1991; Doll et al, 1986); however, the causal relationship to etoposide is not clear.
    b) CASE REPORT: One case of a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction has been reported after bleomycin and etoposide treatment. During administration of 180 mg of intravenous etoposide on day 3 of a 5 day protocol for nonseminomatous retroperitoneal germ-cell cancer, a 28-year-old man experienced chest pain and dyspnea. Additionally, the protocol had included bleomycin and cisplatin. ECG findings were negative; however, anginal symptoms reappeared again on day 4 during etoposide infusion. Elevated cardiac enzymes and repeat ECG without Q-waves were supportive of a posterolateral myocardial infarction; echocardiography 2 days after the event revealed posterobasal hypokinesia. Chest pain disappeared after 20 hours with the normalization of enzymes occurring within 3 days. A follow-up scintigraphy at 4 weeks revealed only a small irreversible posteroseptal perfusion defect (Schwarzer et al, 1991).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DYSPNEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) One study reported 3 cases of hypersensitivity reactions resulting in dyspnea, acute bronchospasm, apnea, and cyanosis after combination chemotherapy (etoposide, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, vincristine) (de Souza et al, 1994).
    b) Flushing, shortness of breath, and hypotension occurred in one patient shortly after starting an infusion of etoposide. The symptoms were reversed upon discontinuation of the drug and did not recur when etoposide was restarted at a slower rate (Cersosimo et al, 1989).
    B) APNEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) One study reported 3 cases of apnea developing after etoposide infusion. The episodes were not characteristic of hypersensitivity reactions (Rushing et al, 1993).
    C) FIBROSIS OF LUNG
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Interstitial pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis have been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: A case of fatal pulmonary toxicity was reported after treatment with 2 cycles of oral etoposide 50 mg/day during days 1 thorough 20 of a 28 day cycle. Five days after initiation of etoposide therapy, the patient presented to the ED with cyanosis, tachypnea, and weakness in the left leg. A chest X-ray revealed diffuse infiltrates. An open lung biopsy showed severely damaged lung tissue characterized by diffuse interstitial fibrosis (Dajczman et al, 1995).
    c) One week after commencing etoposide (100 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 through 3) with cisplatin and thoracic irradiation, a 68-year-old woman developed dyspnea and diffuse bilateral interstitial infiltrates, which progressed rapidly to necessitate mechanical ventilation. Findings from open lung biopsy included focal hyaline membrane, interstitial fibrosis, and type-II alveolar cell hyperplasia. She recovered with high-dose methylprednisolone. Comparable signs and symptoms appeared when she later received a course of oral etoposide without steroids (Gurjal et al, 1999).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man also experienced worsening dyspnea with diffuse bilateral interstitial and alveolar infiltrates after 6 cycles of etoposide (80 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 3) and died shortly thereafter. In addition to adenocarcinoma, autopsy revealed fibrosis, focal hyaline membrane, alveolar hemorrhage and atypical hyperplasia (Gurjal et al, 1999).
    D) PNEUMONITIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Interstitial pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis have been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: Pneumonitis occurred in a 63-year-old man with lung cancer after 7 months of etoposide 25 mg/day. The patient had reticulonodular shadows in bilateral lung fields, and diffuse interstitial shadows. Biopsy revealed edema of the alveolar walls and proliferation of type II alveolar epithelial cells. Withdrawal of etoposide and treatment with methylprednisolone resulted in full recovery (Araki et al, 1993).
    c) In a retrospective study, a lack of enhanced radiation pneumonitis by etoposide was reported in patients receiving thoracic irradiation for lung cancer (Glaholm et al, 1988).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NEUROPATHY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Etoposide therapy has been associated with the development of peripheral neuropathy in 1% to 2% of patients (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    b) Following high dose etoposide for autologous bone marrow transplantation (60 mg/kg combined with melphalan) 6 of 142 patients developed grade 2-3 polyneuropathy which began 2 to 8 weeks after transplant (Imrie et al, 1994).
    B) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Cerebral edema due to a capillary leak syndrome has been reported in patients after receiving therapeutic doses of etoposide (Gerl et al, 1993; Wandt et al, 1993).
    b) CASE REPORT: A patient developed global aphasia and right hemiparesis 2 days after a second course of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin. A CT scan revealed cerebral edema. The patient died 34 hours after the onset of neurological symptoms (Gerl et al, 1993).
    c) CASE REPORT: Cerebral edema developed in a man following high-dose chemotherapy (carboplatin 1500 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 10 grams/m(2), etoposide 1200 mg/m(2)) (duration not specified). Symptoms included a progressive headache and generalized cerebral seizures. The localized edema appeared to be due to a capillary leak syndrome induced by the combination chemotherapy. Individually, these agents have not previously been associated with capillary leak (Wandt et al, 1993).
    C) DYSTONIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Acute dystonia developed in a 11-year-old boy after 54 weeks of treatment with combination chemotherapy (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cytarabine). The patient experienced a recurrence of the dystonia following another cycle of etoposide 2 weeks later. Premedicating with diphenhydramine prevented the dystonia from recurring for the third time (Ascher & Delaney, 1988).
    D) ASTHENIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, asthenia/malaise occurred in 39% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    E) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In clinical trials, dizziness occurred in 5% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide as a total dose over 5 days (n=98) (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    F) SEIZURE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Seizures occasionally associated with allergic reactions have been reported during clinical trials with etoposide (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) The manufacturer has classified etoposide as FDA pregnancy category D. Although no teratogenic effects have been associated with etoposide (monotherapy) use during human pregnancy, teratogenic effects have been observed in animals administered etoposide. Myelosuppression has been reported in infants following maternal use of etoposide.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, no teratogenic effects have been reported with etoposide use during human pregnancy (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006; Matsui et al, 1999).
    B) EMBRYO/FETAL RISK
    1) In general, antineoplastic agents when given during the first trimester are believed to cause increases in the risk of congenital malformations, but when given during the second or third trimesters are believed to only increase the risk of growth retardation (Glantz, 1994; Doll et al, 1988).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Administration of IV etoposide approximately one-twentieth of the human dose on a mg/m(2) basis during organogenesis resulted in maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, and teratogenicity including skeletal abnormalities, exencephaly, encephalocele, and anophthalmia. Administration of IV etoposide at higher doses of either one-seventh or one-half the human dose on a mg/m(2) basis resulted in 90% and 100% of embryonic resorptions, respectively. Similarly, administration of intraperitoneal etoposide approximately one-sixteenth of the human dose on mg/m(2) basis on gestation days 6, 7, or 8 resulted in embryotoxicity, major skeletal malformations, and cranial abnormalities. Intraperitoneal administration of etoposide at a higher dose (one-tenth of the human dose) on gestation day 7 resulted in an increased incidence of intrauterine death, significantly decreased average fetal body weight, and increased fetal malformations (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) The manufacturer has classified etoposide has FDA pregnancy category D (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    2) Advise women to avoid pregnancy while taking etoposide. If pregnancy occurs, inform women of the potential hazard to the fetus (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    B) EMBRYO/FETAL RISK
    1) In general, antineoplastic agents when given during the first trimester are believed to cause increases in the risk of congenital malformations, but when given during the second or third trimesters are believed to only increase the risk of growth retardation (Glantz, 1994; Doll et al, 1988).
    C) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Several cases of etoposide used with other chemotherapeutic agents during pregnancy have been reported (Aviles et al, 1991; Raffles et al, 1989; Sevitz, 1988). No malformations were noted in the infants. Leukopenia, neutropenia, alopecia, and bilateral hearing loss were observed in an infant born at 27 weeks gestation after the mother had been treated for 3 days with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin one week before delivery. Leukopenia and neutropenia resolved by day 13; hearing loss may have been caused by maternal and neonatal gentamicin therapy or maternal cisplatin therapy. Etoposide was thought to have caused the neutropenia, because it is the myelosuppressive of the 3 chemotherapeutic agents given (Raffles et al, 1989).
    2) A preterm infant, whose mother received etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, and daunorubicin during pregnancy, was delivered with severe anemia and neutropenia (Murray et al, 1994).
    D) ABORTIONS
    1) A course of single-agent etoposide for low-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor did not adversely affect future fertility or pregnancy outcomes in a retrospective review. Among 39 patients who wished to conceive in the future (at least 1 year after successfully completing chemotherapy), the infertility rate was 7.7%. Of 36 patients who went on to conceive successfully, 56 conceptions resulted in 42 term live births (75%), 8 spontaneous abortions (14%), 4 elective abortions (7%) and 2 moles (4%). No congenital anomalies or stillbirths were reported; average birth weights were normal. The boy to girl ratio was lower than expected at 15 to 27 (Matsui et al, 1999).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Discontinue nursing or discontinue etoposide taking into consideration the importance of the drug to the mother (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) INFERTILITY
    1) Infertility issues including oligospermia, azoospermia, and permanent fertility loss have been reported in males exposed to etoposide. Damage to spermatozoa and testicular tissues resulting in possible genetic fetal abnormalities have also occurred. Sperm counts may return to normal levels. Infertility, amenorrhea, and premature menopause have been reported in women exposed to etoposide. Recovery of menses and ovulation seems to be associated with treatment age (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Irreversible testicular atrophy was reported in animals following administration of etoposide approximately 10 times the human dose on a mg/m(2) basis or above orally for 5 days OR with doses approximately one-half of the human dose on a mg/m(2) basis for 30 days (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, 2015).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Etoposide may be carcinogenic by causing secondary leukemia. Secondary leukemia occurred in 2 of 337 patients receiving conventional doses of etoposide for at least 2 years in a review of 538 patient records.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LEUKEMIA
    1) Etoposide is a potential carcinogen in humans and may rarely result in acute leukemia, with or without preleukemic phase (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).
    2) A review of the records of 538 patients receiving conventional doses of etoposide to determine the incidence of secondary leukemia revealed that of 337 patients followed for at least 2 years, 2 developed leukemia (Nichols et al, 1993).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) At the time of this review, the manufacturer does not report any carcinogenic potential of etoposide in animals (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006).

Genotoxicity

    A) Etoposide in vivo was mutagenic in the Ames assay (Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2006). In in vitro studies, etoposide was not mutagenic in the Ames microbial mutagenicity assay and the E. coli WP2 uvrA reverse mutation assay (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    B) Etoposide can cause a dose-related increase in sister chromatid exchanges in hamster ovary cells (Prod Info Vepesid(R), etoposide, 1998).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs, serum electrolytes, renal function and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    B) Clinically evaluate patients for the development of mucositis.
    C) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. After therapeutic dosing, nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21 but may be delayed. Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    D) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. After therapeutic doses, nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadirs 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21 but may be delayed. (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011). Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs, serum electrolytes, renal function and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    B) Clinically evaluate patients for the development of mucositis.
    C) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. After therapeutic dosing, nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21 but may be delayed. Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    D) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs, serum electrolytes, renal function and liver enzymes in symptomatic patients.
    2) Clinically evaluate patients for the development of mucositis.
    3) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 21, but may be delayed. Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery.
    4) Monitor for clinical evidence of infection, with particular attention to: odontogenic infection, oropharynx, esophagus, soft tissues particularly in the perirectal region, exit and tunnel sites of central venous access devices, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and urinary tract.
    B) NEUTROPENIA
    1) Patients with severe neutropenia should be in protective isolation.
    2) Colony stimulating factors have been shown to shorten the duration of severe neutropenia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy (Stull et al, 2005; Hartman et al, 1997). They should be administered to any patient who receives an etoposide overdose.
    3) ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS: Treat high risk patients with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, if the patient is expected to have prolonged (more than 7 days), profound neutropenia (ANC 100 cells/mm(3) or less). This has been shown to decrease the relative risk of all cause mortality by 48% and or infection-related mortality by 62% in these patients (most patients in these studies had hematologic malignancies or received hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Low risk patients usually do not routinely require antibacterial prophylaxis (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    C) MYELOSUPPRESSION
    1) Severe bone marrow depression (primarily leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) may occur and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Nadir occurs in about 10 to 22 days (leukocyte nadir 15 to 22 days; granulocyte nadir 12 to 19 days; platelet nadir 10 to 15 days); recovery usually occurs by day 2, but may be delayed. Monitor serial CBC (with differential) and platelet count until there is evidence of bone marrow recovery (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    2) NEUTROPENIA
    a) DOSING
    1) FILGRASTIM: The recommended starting dose for adults is 5 mcg/kg/day administered as a single daily subQ injection, by short IV infusion (15 to 30 minutes), or by continuous subQ or IV infusion (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) IV, subcutaneous injection, 2010). According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), treatment should be continued until the ANC is at least 2 to 3 x 10(9)/L (Smith et al, 2006).
    2) SARGRAMOSTIM: The recommended dose is 250 mcg/m(2) day administered intravenously over a 4-hour period. Treatment should be continued until the ANC is at least 2 to 3 x 10(9)/L (Smith et al, 2006).
    b) In one study, patients treated with etoposide 2 to 2.4 g/m2 infused over 10 to 12 hours were treated with subcutaneous rhGM-CSF 5 mcg/kg/day or rhG-CSF 4 mcg/kg/day starting 72 hours after the etoposide infusion. Neutropenia was significantly reduced in terms of degree and duration in both groups as compared with untreated patients (Gianni et al, 1992).
    c) Monitor CBC with differential daily. If fever or infection develops during leukopenic phase, cultures should be obtained and appropriate antibiotics started. Transfusion of platelets and/or packed red cells may be needed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia or hemorrhage.
    3) HIGH-DOSE THERAPY
    a) Higher doses of filgrastim, such as those used for bone marrow transplant, may be indicated after overdose.
    b) FILGRASTIM: In patients receiving bone marrow transplant (BMT), the recommended dose of filgrastim is 10 mcg/kg/day given as an IV infusion of 4 or 24 hours, or as a continuous 24 hour subQ infusion. The daily dose of filgrastim should be titrated based on neutrophil response (ie, absolute neutrophil count (ANC)) as follows (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) IV, subcutaneous injection, 2010):
    1) When ANC is greater than 1000/mm(3) for 3 consecutive days; reduce filgrastim to 5 mcg/kg/day.
    2) If ANC remains greater than 1000/mm(3) for 3 more consecutive days; discontinue filgrastim.
    3) If ANC decreases again to less than 1000/mm(3); resume filgrastim at 5 mcg/kg/day.
    c) In BMT studies, patients received up to 138 mcg/kg/day without toxic effects. However, a flattening of the dose response curve occurred at daily doses of greater than 10 mcg/kg/day (Prod Info NEUPOGEN(R) IV, subcutaneous injection, 2010).
    d) SARGRAMOSTIM: This agent has been indicated for the acceleration of myeloid recovery in patients after autologous or allogenic BMT. Usual dosing is 250 mcg/m(2)/day as a 2-hour IV infusion. Duration is based on neutrophil recovery (Prod Info LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous, IV injection, 2008).
    4) SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
    a) In pediatric patients, the use of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) can reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia. However, this therapy should be limited to patients at high risk due to the potential of developing a secondary myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome associated with the use of CSFs. Careful consideration is suggested in using CSFs in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) (Smith et al, 2006).
    D) FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Due to the risk of potentially severe neutropenia following overdose with etoposide, all patients should be monitored for the development of febrile neutropenia.
    2) CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    a) SUMMARY: The following are guidelines presented by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) to manage patients with cancer that may develop chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    b) DEFINITION: Patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated immediately with empiric antibiotic therapy; antibiotic therapy should broadly treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    c) CRITERIA: Fever (greater than or equal to 38.3 degrees C) AND neutropenia (an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than or equal to 500 cells/mm(3)). Profound neutropenia has been described as an ANC of less than or equal to 100 cells/mm(3) (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    d) ASSESSMENT: HIGH RISK PATIENT: Anticipated neutropenia of greater than 7 days, clinically unstable and significant comorbidities (ie, new onset of hypotension, pneumonia, abdominal pain, neurologic changes). LOW RISK PATIENT: Neutropenia anticipated to last less than 7 days, clinically stable with no comorbidities (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    e) LABORATORY ANALYSIS: CBC with differential leukocyte count and platelet count, hepatic and renal function, electrolytes, 2 sets of blood cultures with a least a set from a central and/or peripheral indwelling catheter site, if present. Urinalysis and urine culture (if urinalysis positive, urinary symptoms or indwelling urinary catheter). Chest x-ray, if patient has respiratory symptoms (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    f) EMPIRIC ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY: HIGH RISK patients should be admitted to the hospital for IV therapy. Any of the following can be used for empiric antibiotic monotherapy: piperacillin-tazobactam; a carbapenem (meropenem or imipenem-cilastatin); an antipseudomonal beta-lactam agent (eg, ceftazidime or cefepime). LOW RISK patients should be placed on an oral empiric antibiotic therapy (ie, ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate), if able to tolerate oral therapy and observed for 4 to 24 hours. IV therapy may be indicated, if patient poorly tolerating an oral regimen (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    1) ADJUST THERAPY: Adjust therapy based on culture results, clinical assessment (ie, hemodynamic instability or sepsis), catheter-related infections (ie, cellulitis, chills, rigors) and radiographic findings. Suggested therapies may include: vancomycin or linezolid for cellulitis or pneumonia; the addition of an aminoglycoside and switch to carbapenem for pneumonia or gram negative bacteremia; or metronidazole for abdominal symptoms or suspected C. difficile infection (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    2) DURATION OF THERAPY: Dependent on the particular organism(s), resolution of neutropenia (until ANC is equal or greater than 500 cells/mm(3)), and clinical evaluation. Ongoing symptoms may require further cultures and diagnostic evaluation, and review of antibiotic therapies. Consider the use of empiric antifungal therapy, broader antimicrobial coverage, if patient hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable and responding to therapy, it may be appropriate to switch to outpatient therapy (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    g) COMMON PATHOGENS frequently observed in neutropenic patients (Freifeld et al, 2011):
    1) GRAM-POSITIVE PATHOGENS: Coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus (including MRSA strains), Enterococcus species (including vancomycin-resistant strains), Viridans group streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyrogenes.
    2) GRAM NEGATIVE PATHOGENS: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Citrobacter species, Acinetobacter species, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
    h) HEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH FACTORS (G-CSF or GM-CSF): Prophylactic use of these agents should be considered in patients with an anticipated risk of fever and neutropenia of 20% or greater. In general, colony stimulating factors are not recommended for the treatment of established fever and neutropenia (Freifeld et al, 2011).
    E) VOMITING
    1) TREATMENT OF BREAKTHROUGH NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    a) Treat patients with high-dose dopamine (D2) receptor antagonists (eg, metoclopramide), phenothiazines (eg, prochlorperazine, promethazine), 5-HT3 serotonin antagonists (eg, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron), benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam), corticosteroids (eg, dexamethasone), and antipsychotics (eg, haloperidol, olanzapine); diphenhydramine may be required to prevent dystonic reactions from dopamine antagonists, phenothiazines, and antipsychotics. It may be necessary to treat with multiple concomitant agents, from different drug classes, using alternating schedules or alternating routes. In general, rectal medications should be avoided in patients with neutropenia.
    b) DOPAMINE RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS: Metoclopramide: Adults: 10 to 40 mg orally or IV and then every 4 or 6 hours, as needed. Dose of 2 mg/kg IV every 2 to 4 hours for 2 to 5 doses may also be given. Monitor for dystonic reactions; add diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg orally or IV every 4 to 6 hours as needed for dystonic reactions (None Listed, 1999). Children: 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg IV every 6 hours; MAXIMUM: 10 mg/dose (Dupuis & Nathan, 2003).
    c) PHENOTHIAZINES: Prochlorperazine: Adults: 25 mg suppository as needed every 12 hours or 10 mg orally or IV every 4 or 6 hours as needed; Children (2 yrs or older): 20 to 29 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 1 to 2 times daily (MAX 7.5 mg/day); 30 to 39 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 2 to 3 times daily (MAX 10 mg/day); 40 to 85 pounds: 2.5 mg orally 3 times daily or 5 mg orally twice daily (MAX 15 mg/day) OR 2 yrs or older and greater than 20 pounds: 0.06 mg/pound IM as a single dose (Prod Info COMPAZINE(R) tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup, 2004; Prod Info Compazine(R), 2002). Promethazine: Adults: 12.5 to 25 mg orally or IV every 4 hours; Children (2 yr and older) 12.5 to 25 mg OR 0.5 mg/pound orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed (Prod Info promethazine hcl rectal suppositories, 2007). Chlorpromazine: Children: greater than 6 months of age, 0.55 mg/kg orally every 4 to 6 hours, or IV every 6 to 8 hours; max of 40 mg per dose if age is less than 5 years or weight is less than 22 kg (None Listed, 1999).
    d) SEROTONIN 5-HT3 ANTAGONISTS: Dolasetron: Adults: 100 mg orally daily or 1.8 mg/kg IV or 100 mg IV. Granisetron: Adults: 1 to 2 mg orally daily or 1 mg orally twice daily or 0.01 mg/kg (maximum 1 mg) IV or transdermal patch containing 34.3 mg granisetron. Ondansetron: Adults: 16 mg orally or 8 mg IV daily (Kris et al, 2006; None Listed, 1999); Children (older than 3 years of age): 0.15 mg/kg IV 4 and 8 hours after chemotherapy (None Listed, 1999).
    e) BENZODIAZEPINES: Lorazepam: Adults: 1 to 2 mg orally or IM/IV every 6 hours; Children: 0.05 mg/kg, up to a maximum of 3 mg, orally or IV every 8 to 12 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).
    f) STEROIDS: Dexamethasone: Adults: 10 to 20 mg orally or IV every 4 to 6 hours; Children: 5 to 10 mg/m(2) orally or IV every 12 hours as needed; methylprednisolone: children: 0.5 to 1 mg/kg orally or IV every 12 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).
    g) ANTIPSYCHOTICS: Haloperidol: Adults: 1 to 4 mg orally or IM/IV every 6 hours as needed (None Listed, 1999).
    F) STOMATITIS
    1) Treat mild mucositis with bland oral rinses with 0.9% saline, sodium bicarbonate, and water. For moderate cases with pain, consider adding a topical anesthetic (eg, lidocaine, benzocaine, dyclonine, diphenhydramine, or doxepin). Treat moderate to severe mucositis with topical anesthetics and systemic analgesics (eg, morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl). Patients with mucositis and moderate xerostomia may receive sialagogues (eg, sugarless candy/mints, pilocarpine/cevimeline, or bethanechol) and topical fluorides to stimulate salivary gland function. Patients who are receiving myelosuppressive therapy may receive prophylactic antiviral and antifungal agents to prevent infections. Topical oral antimicrobial mouthwashes, rinses, pastilles, or lozenges may be used to decrease the risk of infection (Bensinger et al, 2008).
    2) Palifermin is indicated to reduce the incidence and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving myelotoxic therapy requiring hematopoietic stem cell support. In these patients, palifermin is administered before and after chemotherapy. DOSES: 60 mcg/kg/day IV bolus injection for 3 consecutive days before and 3 consecutive days after myelotoxic therapy for a total of 6 doses. Palifermin should not be given within 24 hours before, during infusion, or within 24 hours after administration of myelotoxic chemotherapy, as this has been shown to increase the severity and duration of mucositis. (Hensley et al, 2009; Prod Info KEPIVANCE(TM) IV injection, 2005). In patients with an etoposide overdose in whom neutropenia and mucositis would be anticipated, administer palifermin 60 mcg/kg/day IV bolus injection starting 24 hours after the overdose for 3 consecutive days.
    3) Total parenteral nutrition may provide nutritional requirements during the healing phase of drug-induced oral ulceration, mucositis, and esophagitis.
    4) In a randomized, placebo-controlled trials, 12 patients with Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were receiving etoposide 1800 mg/m(2) as part of a highly myelosuppressive regimen before autologous bone marrow transplant, were randomly assigned to receive either propantheline 30 mg or placebo orally every 6 hours for 6 doses. Acyclovir and nystatin or clotrimazole were also given to all patients. Patients in propantheline group had lower incidence (2 of 6 vs 5 of 6) and severity (p = 0.05) of mucositis as compared with placebo (Ahmed et al, 1993).
    G) EXTRAVASATION INJURY
    1) Etoposide is an irritant (Gippsland Oncology Nurses Group, 2010; Sauerland et al, 2006).
    2) In clinical trials, extravasation/phlebitis occurred in 5% of patients who received 450 mg/m(2) or more of etoposide phosphate as a total dose over 5 days. Infiltration with etoposide phosphate may cause local swelling, pain, cellulitis and necrosis (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).
    3) If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion. Disconnect the IV tubing, but leave the cannula or needle in place. Attempt to aspirate the extravasated drug from the needle or cannula. If possible, withdraw 3 to 5 mL of blood and/or fluids through the needle/cannula. Elevate the affected area. Immediately apply warm packs for 15 to 20 minutes at least 4 times daily to disperse and dilute the agent. Monitor site closely to avoid tissue injury due to heat application. Cooling may increase the risk of etoposide crystallization. Administer analgesia for severe pain. If pain persists, there is concern for compartment syndrome, or injury is apparent, an early surgical consult should be considered. Close observation of the extravasated area is suggested. If tissue sloughing, necrosis or blistering occurs, treat as a chemical burn (ie, antiseptic dressings, silver sulfadiazine, antibiotics when applicable). Surgical or enzymatic debridement may be required. Risk of infection is increased in chemotherapy patients with reduced neutrophil count following extravasation. Consider culturing any open wounds. Monitor the site for the development of cellulitis, which may require antibiotic therapy (Gippsland Oncology Nurses Group, 2010; The University of Kansas Hospital, 2009; Schulmeister, 2009; Schulmeister, 2008; Wengstrom et al, 2008; Goolsby & Lombardo, 2006; Bellin et al, 2002; Cohan et al, 1996; Upton et al, 1979; Brown et al, 1979; Banerjee et al, 1987; Chait & Dinner, 1975; Dorr & Fritz, 1980; Hirsh & Conlon, 1983; Hoff et al, 1979; Ignoffo & Friedman, 1980; Larson, 1982; Loth & Eversmann, 1986; Lynch et al, 1979; Upton et al, 1979a; Yosowitz et al, 1975; Wengstrom et al, 2008; National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Nursing Department, 1999).
    H) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Infuse 10 to 20 milliliters/kilogram of isotonic fluid and keep the patient supine. If hypotension persists, administer dopamine or norepinephrine. Consider central venous pressure monitoring to guide further fluid therapy.
    2) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    3) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    b) DOSE
    1) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    I) PERIPHERAL AXONAL NEUROPATHY
    1) Peripheral neurotoxicity should be anticipated in overdose. Monitor and treat symptoms as indicated.
    J) DRUG-INDUCED DYSTONIA
    1) ADULT
    a) BENZTROPINE: 1 to 4 mg once or twice daily intravenously or intramuscularly; maximum dose: 6 mg/day; 1 to 2 mg of the injection will usually provide quick relief in emergency situations (Prod Info benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, 2009).
    b) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 10 to 50 mg intravenously at a rate not exceeding 25 mg/minute or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 100 mg/dose; 400 mg/day (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    2) CHILDREN
    a) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: 5 mg/kg/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day intravenously divided into 4 doses at a rate not to exceed 25 mg/min, or deep intramuscularly; maximum dose: 300 mg/day. Not recommended in premature infants and neonates (Prod Info diphenhydramine hcl injection, 2006).
    K) ANAPHYLAXIS
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Mild to moderate allergic reactions may be treated with antihistamines with or without inhaled beta adrenergic agonists, corticosteroids or epinephrine. Treatment of severe anaphylaxis also includes oxygen supplementation, aggressive airway management, epinephrine, ECG monitoring, and IV fluids.
    2) BRONCHOSPASM
    a) ALBUTEROL
    1) ADULT: 2.5 to 5 milligrams in 2 to 4.5 milliliters of normal saline delivered per nebulizer every 20 minutes up to 3 doses. If incomplete response administer 2.5 to 10 mg every 1 to 4 hours as needed, or 10 to 15 mg/hr by continuous nebulization as needed (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). CHILD: 0.15 milligram/kilogram (minimum 2.5 milligrams) per nebulizer every 20 minutes up to 3 doses. If incomplete response administer 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg (up to 10 mg) every 1 to 4 hours as needed, or 0.5 mg/kg/hr by continuous nebulization (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    3) CORTICOSTEROIDS
    a) Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    b) PREDNISONE: ADULT: 40 to 80 milligrams/day. CHILD: 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram/day (maximum 60 mg) in 1 to 2 divided doses divided twice daily (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    4) MILD CASES
    a) DIPHENHYDRAMINE
    1) SUMMARY: Oral diphenhydramine, as well as other H1 antihistamines can be used as indicated (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT: 50 milligrams orally, or 10 to 50 mg intravenously at a rate not to exceed 25 mg/min or may be given by deep intramuscular injection. A total of 100 mg may be administered if needed. Maximum daily dosage is 400 mg (Prod Info diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution, 2013).
    3) CHILD: 5 mg/kg/24 hours or 150 mg/m(2)/24 hours. Divided into 4 doses, administered intravenously at a rate not exceeding 25 mg/min or by deep intramuscular injection. Maximum daily dosage is 300 mg (Prod Info diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution, 2013).
    5) MODERATE CASES
    a) EPINEPHRINE: INJECTABLE SOLUTION: It should be administered early in patients by IM injection. Using a 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution of epinephrine. Initial Dose: 0.01 mg/kg intramuscularly with a maximum dose of 0.5 mg in adults and 0.3 mg in children. The dose may be repeated every 5 to 15 minutes, if no clinical improvement. Most patients respond to 1 or 2 doses (Nowak & Macias, 2014).
    6) SEVERE CASES
    a) EPINEPHRINE
    1) INTRAVENOUS BOLUS: ADULT: 1 mg intravenously as a 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution; CHILD: 0.01 mL/kg intravenously to a maximum single dose of 1 mg given as a 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution. It can be repeated every 3 to 5 minutes as needed. The dose can also be given by the intraosseous route if IV access cannot be established (Lieberman et al, 2015). ALTERNATIVE ROUTE: ENDOTRACHEAL ADMINISTRATION: If IV/IO access is unavailable. DOSE: ADULT: Administer 2 to 2.5 mg of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution diluted in 5 to 10 mL of sterile water via endotracheal tube. CHILD: DOSE: 0.1 mg/kg to a maximum of 2.5 mg administered as a 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution diluted in 5 to 10 mL of sterile water via endotracheal tube (Lieberman et al, 2015).
    2) INTRAVENOUS INFUSION: Intravenous administration may be considered in patients poorly responsive to IM or SubQ epinephrine. An epinephrine infusion may be prepared by adding 1 mg (1 mL of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution) to 250 mL D5W, yielding a concentration of 4 mcg/mL, and infuse this solution IV at a rate of 1 mcg/min to 10 mcg/min (maximum rate). CHILD: A dosage of 0.01 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of a 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution up to 10 mcg/min (maximum dose 0.3 mg) is recommended for children (Lieberman et al, 2010). Careful titration of a continuous infusion of IV epinephrine, based on the severity of the reaction, along with a crystalloid infusion can be considered in the treatment of anaphylactic shock. It appears to be a reasonable alternative to IV boluses, if the patient is not in cardiac arrest (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    7) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    a) OXYGEN: 5 to 10 liters/minute via high flow mask.
    b) INTUBATION: Perform early if any stridor or signs of airway obstruction.
    c) CRICOTHYROTOMY: Use if unable to intubate with complete airway obstruction (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).
    d) BRONCHODILATORS are recommended for mild to severe bronchospasm.
    e) ALBUTEROL: ADULT: 2.5 to 5 milligrams in 2 to 4.5 milliliters of normal saline delivered per nebulizer every 20 minutes up to 3 doses. If incomplete response administer 2.5 to 10 mg every 1 to 4 hours as needed, or 10 to 15 mg/hr by continuous nebulization as needed (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    f) ALBUTEROL: CHILD: 0.15 milligram/kilogram (minimum 2.5 milligrams) per nebulizer every 20 minutes up to 3 doses. If incomplete response administer 0.15 to 0.3 milligram/kilogram (maximum 10 milligrams) every 1 to 4 hours as needed OR administer 0.5 mg/kg/hr by continuous nebulization (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    8) MONITORING
    a) CARDIAC MONITOR: All complicated cases.
    b) IV ACCESS: Routine in all complicated cases.
    9) HYPOTENSION
    a) If hypotensive give 500 to 2000 milliliters crystalloid initially (20 milliliters/kilogram in children) and titrate to desired effect (stabilization of vital signs, mentation, urine output); adults may require up to 6 to 10 L/24 hours. Central venous or pulmonary artery pressure monitoring is recommended in patients with persistent hypotension.
    1) VASOPRESSORS: Should be used in refractory cases unresponsive to repeated doses of epinephrine and after vigorous intravenous crystalloid rehydration (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    2) DOPAMINE: Initial Dose: 2 to 20 micrograms/kilogram/minute intravenously; titrate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    10) H1 and H2 ANTIHISTAMINES
    a) SUMMARY: Antihistamines are second-line therapy and are used as supportive therapy and should not be used in place of epinephrine (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    1) DIPHENHYDRAMINE: ADULT: 25 to 50 milligrams via a slow intravenous infusion or IM. PEDIATRIC: 1 milligram/kilogram via slow intravenous infusion or IM up to 50 mg in children (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    b) RANITIDINE: ADULT: 1 mg/kg parenterally; CHILD: 12.5 to 50 mg parenterally. If the intravenous route is used, ranitidine should be infused over 10 to 15 minutes or diluted in 5% dextrose to a volume of 20 mL and injected over 5 minutes (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    c) Oral diphenhydramine, as well as other H1 antihistamines, can also be used as indicated (Lieberman et al, 2010).
    11) DYSRHYTHMIAS
    a) Dysrhythmias and cardiac dysfunction may occur primarily or iatrogenically as a result of pharmacologic treatment (epinephrine) (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al). Monitor and correct serum electrolytes, oxygenation and tissue perfusion. Treat with antiarrhythmic agents as indicated.
    12) OTHER THERAPIES
    a) There have been a few reports of patients with anaphylaxis, with or without cardiac arrest, that have responded to vasopressin therapy that did not respond to standard therapy. Although there are no randomized controlled trials, other alternative vasoactive therapies (ie, vasopressin, norepinephrine, methoxamine, and metaraminol) may be considered in patients in cardiac arrest secondary to anaphylaxis that do not respond to epinephrine (Vanden Hoek,TL,et al).

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) DIALYSIS
    1) Dialysis is UNLIKELY to be of benefit due to high protein binding and large volume of distribution.
    B) PLASMA EXCHANGE
    1) Effectiveness has not been reported. Removal of plasma proteins might be an effective method of reducing the body burden following overdose.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with an etoposide overdose need to be admitted, as toxicity develops over several days. Patients should be closely monitored in an inpatient setting, with frequent monitoring of vital signs (every 4 hours for the first 24 hours), and daily monitoring of CBC with differential until bone marrow suppression is resolved.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) There is no data to support home management.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult an oncologist, medical toxicologist and/or poison center for assistance in managing patients with an etoposide overdose. In addition, consultation with an infectious disease physician with expertise in the management of neutropenic patients with infections is strongly recommended.
    6.3.1.4) PATIENT TRANSFER/ORAL
    A) Patients with large overdoses may benefit from early transfer to a cancer treatment or bone marrow transplant center.
    6.3.2) DISPOSITION/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.2.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) Patients with an etoposide overdose need to be admitted, as toxicity develops over several days. Patients should be closely monitored in an inpatient setting, with frequent monitoring of vital signs (every 4 hours for the first 24 hours), and daily monitoring of CBC with differential until bone marrow suppression is resolved.
    6.3.2.2) HOME CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) There is no data to support home management.
    6.3.2.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/PARENTERAL
    A) Consult an oncologist, medical toxicologist and/or poison center for assistance in managing patients with etoposide overdose. In addition, consultation with an infectious disease physician with expertise in the management of neutropenic patients with infections is strongly recommended.
    6.3.2.4) PATIENT TRANSFER/PARENTERAL
    A) Patients with large overdoses may benefit from early transfer to a cancer treatment or bone marrow transplant center.

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) A 25-year-old woman mistakenly took 4900 mg of oral etoposide over 25 days. She presented with fatigue, fever, cough, diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Following supportive care, including a blood transfusion, she was discharged after 15 days of hospitalization. At 57 months follow-up, the main complications were myelosuppression and immunosuppression (Pawlicki et al, 1990).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Overdose data are limited. In one case of an overdose (4900 mg oral etoposide over 25 days), the patient presented with fatigue, fever, cough and diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. HIGH-DOSE THERAPY: Elderly patients tolerated oral doses of 800 mg/m(2) with the total dose divided over 5 consecutive days every 3 to 4 weeks for 6 cycles. In clinical studies, including phase I studies, etoposide was administered in doses ranging from 1.8 to 4.8 g/m(2). These doses were usually given in combination with other cytotoxic agents with stem cell support or bone marrow transplantation. Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity in these patients. Other reported effects included severe myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and hepatitis. Two patients developed toxic hepatitis after receiving high-dose etoposide therapy for germinal neoplasms. Each patient received a total cumulative dose of at least 6.8 g/m(2). Liver function abnormalities became clinically apparent approximately 21 days after the last dose of etoposide, and resolved spontaneously without sequelae over 12 weeks. CHILDREN: Etoposide has been administered to children with neuroblastoma as part of multi-agent chemotherapy at a dose of 780 mg/m(2) as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 hours.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULTS: TESTICULAR CANCER: range, 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1 to 5 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1, 3, and 5, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents; repeat at 3- to 4-wk intervals. SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: range, 35 mg/m(2)/day IV for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day IV for 5 days, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents; repeat at 3- to 4-wk intervals. Do not give by bolus IV injection. ORAL: 2 times the IV dose rounded to the nearest 50 mg (eg, 2 times 35 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days). CHILDREN: Safety and efficacy in children has not been established.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) PARENTERAL
    1) TESTICULAR CANCER: range, 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1 to 5 to 100 mg/m(2)/day IV on days 1, 3, and 5, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents, administered over 30 to 60 minutes; repeat at 3- to 4-week intervals. Do not give by bolus or rapid IV injection (Prod Info etoposide intravenous injection, 2014).
    2) SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: range, 35 mg/m(2)/day IV for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day IV for 5 days, in combination with other approved chemotherapeutic agents administered over 30 to 60 minutes; repeat at 3- to 4-week intervals. Do not give by bolus or rapid IV injection (Prod Info etoposide intravenous injection, 2014).
    B) ORAL
    1) SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: Two times the IV dose rounded to the nearest 50 mg (eg, 2 times 35 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days to 50 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) (Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2013).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) Safety and efficacy in children has not been established (Prod Info etoposide intravenous injection, 2014; Prod Info etoposide oral capsules, 2013).
    B) Etoposide has been administered to children with neuroblastoma as a part of multi-agent chemotherapy at a dose of 780 mg/m(2) as a continuous IV infusion over 72 hours (Relling et al, 1994).
    C) Ten children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (5 previously treated) received etoposide 100 mg/m(2) twice weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 to 4 weeks for 2 years. All 10 patients responded (6 are in complete remission for 6 to 36 months). Four patients relapsed (Ishii et al, 1992).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ADULTS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old woman mistakenly took 4900 mg of oral etoposide over 25 days. She presented with fatigue, fever, cough, diarrhea, and early grade 1 to 2 myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Following supportive care, including a blood transfusion, she was discharged after 15 days of hospitalization. At 57 months follow-up, the main complications were myelosuppression and immunosuppression (Pawlicki et al, 1990).
    2) Elderly patients tolerated oral doses of 800 mg/m(2) with the total dose divided over 5 consecutive days every 3 to 4 weeks for 6 cycles (Carney et al, 1990).
    3) In several clinical studies, including phase I studies, etoposide was administered in doses ranging from 1.8 to 4.8 g/m(2). These doses were usually given in combination with other cytotoxic agents with stem cell support or bone marrow transplantation. Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity in these patients. Other reported effects included severe myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and hepatitis (Fields et al, 1995; Fields et al, 1994; Ahmed et al, 1993; Barnett et al, 1993; Gianni et al, 1992; Brown et al, 1990; Wolff et al, 1984).
    4) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed toxic hepatitis after receiving high-dose etoposide therapy for germinal neoplasms. Each patient received a total cumulative dose of at least 6.8 g/m(2). Liver function abnormalities became clinically apparent approximately 21 days after the last dose of etoposide, and resolved spontaneously without sequelae over 12 weeks (Johnson et al, 1983).
    5) INTRATHECAL: Two cancer patients with malignant meningitis were treated with low doses of intrathecal etoposide and did not experience any therapy-related adverse effects. Patients received 0.5 mg IV etoposide diluted in 2 mL saline administered intrathecally once daily for 5 days, followed 3 weeks later by the administration of 0.5 mg etoposide twice daily separated by an interval of 2 or 12 hours for 5 days (van der Gaast et al, 1992).
    B) CHILDREN
    1) In one study, 17 children with stage C or D neuroblastoma were given continuous infusions of etoposide 780 mg/m(2) over 72 hours in combination with other chemotherapy agents and subcutaneous injections of granulocyte colony stimulating factors (14 patients). Etoposide systemic clearance was significantly lowered when cisplatin was administered 2 days before etoposide. Overall, 54 red blood cell transfusions, 11 platelet transfusions, and 13 hospitalizations for fever and neutropenia were required (Relling et al, 1994).
    2) Ten children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (5 previously treated) received etoposide 100 mg/m(2) twice weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 to 4 weeks for 2 years. All 10 patients responded, (6 are in complete remission for 6 to 36 months). Four patients relapsed (Ishii et al, 1992).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.1) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) THERAPEUTIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) Therapeutic serum concentrations at steady state are variable. The value reported in one study was 2.7 mcg/mL, for doses between 75 and 200 mg/m(2) as a 72-hour continuous infusion (McLeod & Evans, 1993).
    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) Serum concentrations at steady state are variable and are higher in patients with appreciable hematologic toxicity. The value reported in one study was 4.7 mcg/mL, for doses between 75 and 200 mg/m(2) as a 72-hour continuous infusion, and was associated with severe hematologic toxicity (McLeod & Evans, 1993).
    2) After intravenous infusion of 100 mg/m(2) over 30 to 60 minutes, a plasma concentration was reported of 21 mg/L 5 minutes after the infusion ended (Henwood & Brogden, 1990).

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    1) 64 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    B) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    1) 215 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    C) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    1) 143 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    D) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    1) 39 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    E) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    1) 1784 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    F) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    1) greater than 200 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent that interferes with cell division by interacting with DNA-topoisomerase II or free radical formation resulting in DNA strand breaks. It also affects the G2 portion of the mammalian cell cycle. At high concentrations, etoposide causes cell lysis during the mitosis phase and at low concentrations, it inhibits cells from entering prophase (Prod Info ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, 2011).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Etoposide is sparingly soluble in water and ether, very soluble in chloroform and methanol, and slightly soluble in ethanol (Prod Info VePesid(R) oral capsules, 2006). It is lipophilic (USPDI, 1999).

Molecular Weight

    A) ETOPOSIDE: 588.56 (Prod Info VePesid(R) oral capsules, 2006)
    B) ETOPOSIDE PHOSPHATE: 668.55 (USPDI, 1999)

General Bibliography

    1) Addiego JE, Ridgway D, & Bleyer WA: The acute management of intrathecal methotrexate overdose: pharmacologic rationale and guidelines. J Pediatr 1981; 98(5):825-828.
    2) Ahmed T, Engelking C, & Szalyga J: Propantheline prevention of mucositis from etoposide. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 12:131-132.
    3) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    4) Araki N, Matsumoto K, Ikuta N, et al: A case of drug induced pneumonitis caused by oral etoposide. Nippon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 1993; 31:903-907.
    5) Ascher DP & Delaney RA: Acute dystonia from etoposide. DICP 1988; 22:41-42.
    6) Aviles A, Diaz-Maqueo JC, Talavera A, et al: Growth and development of children of mothers treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy: current status of 43 children. Am J Hematol 1991; 36:243-248.
    7) Banerjee A, Brotherston TM, Lamberty BG, et al: Cancer chemotherapy agent-induced perivenous extravasation injuries. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63(735):5-9.
    8) Barnett MJ, Coppin CM, Murray N, et al: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Br J Cancer 1993; 68(3):594-598.
    9) Barnett MJ, Coppin CM, Murray N, et al: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Br J Cancer 1993a; 68:594-598.
    10) Bellin MF, Jakobsen JA, Tomassin I, et al: Contrast medium extravasation injury: guidelines for prevention and management. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(11):2807-2812.
    11) Bensinger W, Schubert M, Ang KK, et al: NCCN Task Force Report. prevention and management of mucositis in cancer care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008; 6 Suppl 1:S1-21.
    12) Bernstein BJ & Troner MB: Successful rechallenge with etoposide phosphate after an acute hypersensitivity reaction to etoposide. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19(8):989-991.
    13) Blaney SM, Poplack DG, Godwin K, et al: Effect of body position on ventricular CSF methotrexate concentration following intralumbar administration. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(1):177-179.
    14) Brown AS, Hoelzer DJ, & Piercy SA: Skin necrosis from extravasation of intravenous fluids in children. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64(2):145-150.
    15) Brown RA, Herzig RH, Wolff SN, et al: High-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide without bone marrow transplantation for resistant hematologic malignancy. Blood 1990; 76(3):473-479.
    16) Brunner KW, Sonntag RW, Ryssel HJ, et al: Comparison of the biologic activity of VP-16-213 given IV and orally in capsules or drink ampules. Cancer Treat Rep 1976; 60:1377-1379.
    17) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    18) Carney DN, Grogan L, & Smit EF: Single agent oral etoposide for elderly small cell lung cancer patients. Sem Oncol 1990; 17(Suppl 2):49-53.
    19) Cersosimo RJ, Calarese P, & Karp DD: Acute hypotensive reaction to etoposide with successful rechallenge: case report and review of the literature. DICP 1989; 23:876-877.
    20) Chait LA & Dinner MI: Ulceration caused by cytotoxic drugs. SA Med J 1975; 49:1935-1936.
    21) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    22) Cohan RH, Ellis JH, & Garner WL: Extravasation of radiographic contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Radiology 1996; 200(3):593-604.
    23) Cohen MH, Broder LE, Fossieck BE, et al: Phase II clinical trial of weekly administration of VP-16-213 in small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 1977; 61:489-490.
    24) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    25) Dajczman E, Srolovitz H, & Kreisman H: Fatal pulmonary toxicity following oral etoposide therapy. Lung Cancer 1995; 12:81-86.
    26) Doll DC, List AF, Greco FA, et al: Acute vascular ischemic events after cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors of the testis. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105:48-51.
    27) Doll DC, Ringenberg QS, & Yarbro JW: Management of cancer during pregnancy. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:2058-2064.
    28) Dorr RT & Fritz WL: Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook, Elsevier, New York, NY, 1980.
    29) Dupuis LL & Nathan PC: Options for the prevention and management of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children. Paediatr Drugs 2003; 5(9):597-613.
    30) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    31) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    32) Falkson G, van Dyk JJ, van Eden EB, et al: Clinical trial of an oral form of 4-dimethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-beta-D-ethylidene glucoside (NSC 14150) VP 16-213. Cancer 1975; 35:1141.
    33) Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Lazarus HM, et al: Maximum-tolerated doses of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide given over 6 days followed by autologous stem-cell rescue: toxicity profile. J Clin Oncol 1995a; 13:323-332.
    34) Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Lazarus HM, et al: Maximum-tolerated doses of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide given over 6 days followed by autologous stem-cell rescue: toxicity profile. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(2):323-332.
    35) Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Perkins JB, et al: High-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide: maximum tolerable doses, toxicities, and hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell reinfusion. Semin Oncol 1994a; 21:86-92.
    36) Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Perkins JB, et al: High-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide: maximum tolerable doses, toxicities, and hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell reinfusion. Semin Oncol 1994; 21(5 Suppl 12):86-92.
    37) Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al: Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(4):e56-e93.
    38) Gerl A, Clemm C, & Schleuning M: Fatal cerebrovascular accident associated with chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A:1220-1221.
    39) Gianni AM, Bregni M, & Siena S: Granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion makes high-dose etoposide a safe outpatient regimen that is effective in lymphoma and myeloma patients. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10:1955-1962.
    40) Gippsland Oncology Nurses Group: Assessment, Prevention & Management Of Extravasation Of Cytotoxic Medications. GONG Cancer Care Guidelines. Gippsland Oncology Nurses Group. Gippsland, Victoria, Australia. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gha.net.au/Uploadlibrary/393586908extravasation_guidelines0907.pdf. As accessed 2010-12-08.
    41) Glaholm J, Repetto L, Yarnold JR, et al: Carboplatin (JM8), etoposide (VP16) and thoracic irradiation for small cell lung cancer (S.C.L.C.): an evaluation of lung toxicity. Radiother Oncol 1988; 12:31-37.
    42) Glantz JC: Reproductive toxicology of alkylating agents. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 49:709-715.
    43) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    44) Goolsby TV & Lombardo FA: Extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents: prevention and treatment. Semin Oncol 2006; 33(1):139-143.
    45) Gosselin S & Isbister GK: Re: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(8):609-610.
    46) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    47) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    48) Gurjal A, An T, Valdivieso M et al: Etoposide-induced pulmonary toxicity. Lung Cancer; 26:109-112., 1999.
    49) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    50) Hartman LC, Tschetter LK, Habermann TM, et al: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe chemotherapy-induced afebrile neutropenia.. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1776-1780.
    51) Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, & Joel SP: The pharmacokinetics of oral etoposide (VP16-213) (abstract). Ann Meeting Am Soc Clin Oncol 1984; 3:24.
    52) Hensley ML, Hagerty KL, Kewalramani T, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 clinical practice guideline update: use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy protectants. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(1):127-145.
    53) Henwood JM & Brogden RN: Etoposide: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 1990; 39:438-490.
    54) Hirsh JD & Conlon PF: Implementing guidelines for managing extravasation of antineoplastics. Am J Hosp Pharm 1983; 40:1516-1519.
    55) Hoetelmans RMW, Schornagel JH, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al: Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30:367-371.
    56) Hoff JV, Beatty PA, & Wade JL: Dermal necrosis from dobutamine. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1280.
    57) Ignoffo RJ & Friedman MA: Therapy of local toxicities caused by extravasation of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Treat Rev 1980; 7(1):17-27.
    58) Imrie KR, Couture F, & Turner CC: Peripheral neuropathy following high-dose etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 13:77-79.
    59) Ishii E, Matsuzaki A, Okamura J, et al: Treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children with etoposide. Am J Clin Oncol 1992; 15:515-517.
    60) Jameson CH & Solanki DL: Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with etoposide therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67:1050-1051.
    61) Johnson DH, Greco FA, & Wolff SN: Etoposide-induced hepatic injury: a potential complication of high-dose therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 1983; 67:1023-1024.
    62) Kawai K, Imada S, Lida K, et al: Neutropenic colitis as a complication of high-dose chemotherapy for refractory testicular cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998; 28(9):571-573.
    63) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    64) Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(18):2932-2947.
    65) Kucuk O & Apostol JV: Amsacrine and etoposide-induced paralytic ileus in a patient with acute myelomonocytic leukemia. J Surg Oncol 1985; 28:172-173.
    66) Larson DL: Treatment of tissue extravasation by antitumor agents. Cancer 1982; 49:1796-1799.
    67) Lieberman P, Nicklas R, Randolph C, et al: Anaphylaxis-a practice parameter update 2015. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 115(5):341-384.
    68) Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, et al: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126(3):477-480.
    69) Loth TS & Eversmann WW Jr: Treatment methods for extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents. J Hand Surg 1986; 388-396.
    70) Lynch DJ, Key JC, & White RR: Management and prevention of infiltration and extravasation injury. Surg Clin North Am 1979; 59:939-949.
    71) Matsui H, Iitsuka Y, & Seki K: Pregnancy outcome after treatment with etoposide (VP-16) for low-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1999; 9:166-169.
    72) McLeod HL & Evans WE: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epipodophyllotoxins. Cancer Surveys 1993; 17:253-268.
    73) Meggs WJ & Hoffman RS: Fatality resulting from intraventricular vincristine administration. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36(3):243-246.
    74) Michelagnoli MP, Bailey CC, Wilson I, et al: Potential salvage therapy for inadvertent intrathecal administration of vincristine. Br J Haematol 1997; 99:364-367.
    75) Mitchell RB, Wagner JE, Karp JE, et al: Syndrome of idiopathic hyperammonemia after high-dose chemotherapy: review of nine cases. Am J Med 1988; 85:662-667.
    76) Murray NA, Acolet D, & Deane M: Fetal marrow suppression after maternal chemotherapy for leukaemia. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71:F209-F210.
    77) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    78) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    79) National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Nursing Department: SOP: care of the patient receiving intravenous cytotoxics or biological agents. NIH. Bethesda, MDAvailable from URL: http://www.cc.nih.gov/nursing/ivctxsop.html.
    80) Nichols CR, Breeden ES, & Loehrer PJ: Secondary leukemia associated with a conventional dose of etoposide: review of serial germ cell tumor protocols. J Natl Canc Instit 1993; 85:36-40.
    81) Nissen NI, Domberowsky P, Hansen HH, et al: Phase I clinical trial of an oral solution of VP-16-213. Cancer Treat Rep 1976; 60:943-945.
    82) None Listed: ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on the Pharmacologic Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Adult and Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy or Undergoing Surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56(8):729-764.
    83) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    84) Nowak RM & Macias CG : Anaphylaxis on the other front line: perspectives from the emergency department. Am J Med 2014; 127(1 Suppl):S34-S44.
    85) O'Marcaigh AS, Johnson CM, & Smithson WA: Successful treatment of intrathecal methotrexate overdose by using ventriculolumbar perfusion and trathecal instillation of carboxypeptidase G2. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71:161-165.
    86) Obermair A, Vavra N, & Kurz C: Letters to the editor (letter). Gynecol Oncol 1995; 57:436.
    87) Ogle KM & Kennedy BJ: Hypersensitivity reactions fo etoposide. Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 663-665, 1988.
    88) Pawlicki M, Vogelgesang BZ, & Sliz E: The case of vepesid overdosage in a patient with Hodgkin's disease (letter). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1990; 25:387.
    89) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    90) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    91) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    92) Product Information: COMPAZINE(R) tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup, prochlorperazine tablets, injection, suppositories, syrup. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
    93) Product Information: Compazine(R), prochlorperazine maleate spansule. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
    94) Product Information: ETOPOPHOS(R) IV injection, etoposide phosphate IV injection. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, 2011.
    95) Product Information: ETOPOPHOS(R) intravenous injection, etoposide phosphate intravenous injection. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (per FDA), Princeton, NJ, 2015.
    96) Product Information: KEPIVANCE(TM) IV injection, palifermin IV injection. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2005.
    97) Product Information: LEUKINE(R) subcutaneous, IV injection, sargramostim subcutaneous, IV injection. Bayer Healthcare, Seattle, WA, 2008.
    98) Product Information: NEUPOGEN(R) IV, subcutaneous injection, filgrastim IV, subcutaneous injection. Amgen Manufacturing, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010.
    99) Product Information: VePesid(R) oral capsules, etoposide oral capsules. R.P. Scherer GmbH, Baden, Germany, 2006.
    100) Product Information: Vepesid(R), etoposide. Bristol Laboratories, Princeton, NJ, 1998.
    101) Product Information: benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection, benztropine mesylate IV, IM injection. West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp, Eatontown, NJ, 2009.
    102) Product Information: diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution, diphenhydramine HCl intravenous injection solution, intramuscular injection solution. Hospira, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    103) Product Information: diphenhydramine hcl injection, diphenhydramine hcl injection. Bioniche Pharma USA,LLC, Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    104) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    105) Product Information: etoposide intravenous injection, etoposide intravenous injection. BluePoint Laboratories (per DailyMed), Colombus, OH, 2014.
    106) Product Information: etoposide oral capsules, etoposide oral capsules. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc (per DailyMed), Morgantown, WV, 2006.
    107) Product Information: etoposide oral capsules, etoposide oral capsules. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc (per DailyMed), Morgantown, WV, 2013.
    108) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    109) Product Information: promethazine hcl rectal suppositories, promethazine hcl rectal suppositories. Perrigo, Allegan, MI, 2007.
    110) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    111) Raffles A, Williams J, Costeloe K, et al: Transplacental effects of maternal cancer chemotherapy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1099-1100.
    112) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    113) Relling MV, McLeod HL, & Bowman LC: Etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after acute and chronic exposure to cisplatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 56:503-511.
    114) Rodriguez J, Collazos J, & Gallardo M: Angina pectoris following cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin in a patient with advanced testicular cancer. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29:138-139.
    115) Rozencweig M, Von Hoff DD, Henney JE, et al: VM 26 and VP 16-213: a comparative analysis. Cancer 1977; 40:334-342.
    116) Rushing DA, Smith S, & Cusic M: Apnea after etoposide (letter). Lancet 1993; 1353-1354.
    117) Ryssel HJ, Hasler E, Sonntag RW, et al: VP 16-213 combined with endoxan, methotrexate and oncovin in polychemotherapy of bronchogenic carcinoma. Schweiz Med Wschr 1977; 107:912-915.
    118) Sauerland C, Engelking C, Wickham R, et al: Vesicant extravasation part I: Mechanisms, pathogenesis, and nursing care to reduce risk. Oncol Nurs Forum 2006; 33(6):1134-1141.
    119) Schey SA, Cooper J, & Summerhayes M: The "handfoot syndrome" occurring with chronic administration of etoposide (letter). Eur J Haem 1992; 48:118-119.
    120) Schulmeister L: Managing vesicant extravasations. Oncologist 2008; 13(3):284-288.
    121) Schulmeister L: Vesicant chemotherapy extravasation antidotes and treatments. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2009; 13(4):395-398.
    122) Schwarzer S, Eber B, & Greinix H: Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction associated with bleomycin and etoposide chemotherapy. Eur Heart J 1991; 12:748-750.
    123) Sevitz H: Term pregnancy after three trophoblastic disease events. Gynecol Oncol 1988; 29:255-256.
    124) Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al: 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(19):3187-3205.
    125) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    126) Stull DM, Bilmes R, Kim H, et al: Comparison of sargramostim and filgrastim in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62(1):83-87.
    127) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    128) The University of Kansas Hospital: Guide to extravasation management in adult & pediatric patients. The University of Kansas Hospital. Kansas City, KS. 2009. Available from URL: http://www2.kumc.edu/pharmacy/guidelines/Extravasations%20diagram.pdf. As accessed 2012-09-11.
    129) Tran A, Housset C, & Boboc B: Etoposide (VP 16-213) induced hepatitis: report of three cases following standard-dose treatments. J Hepatol 1991; 12:36-39.
    130) USPDI: Volume 1: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional, 19th ed, US Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc, Rockville, MD, 1999.
    131) Umeki S: Intravenous etoposide therapy and intractable hiccups (letter). Chest 1991; 100:887.
    132) Upton J, Mulliken JB, & Murray JE: Major intravenous extravasation injuries. Am J Surg 1979; 137(4):497-506.
    133) Upton J, Mulliken JB, & Murray JE: Major intravenous extravasation injuries. Am J Surg 1979a; 137:497-506.
    134) Van Echo DA, Wiernik PH, & Aisner J: High-dose VP 16-213 (NSC 141540) for the treatment of patients with previously treated acute leukemia. Cancer Clin Trials 1980; 3:325-328.
    135) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M; et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    136) Wandt H, Birkmann J, Seifert M, et al: Localized cerebral edema after high-dose chemotherapy and ABMT for germ cell tumor. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 11:419-420.
    137) Wengstrom Y, Margulies A, & European Oncology Nursing Society Task Force: European Oncology Nursing Society extravasation guidelines. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2008; 12(4):357-361.
    138) Widemann BC, Balis FM, Shalabi A, et al: Treatment of accidental intrathecal methotrexate overdose with intrathecal carboxypeptidase G2. J Nat Cancer Inst 2004; 96(20):1557-1559.
    139) Williams BJ, Roth DJ, & Callen JP: Ultraviolet recall associated with etoposide and cyclophosphamide therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 1993; 18:452-453.
    140) Wolff SN, Johnson DH, Hainsworth JD, et al: High-dose VP-16-213 monotherapy for refractory germinal malignancies: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2(4):271-274.
    141) Wolff SN: High-dose carmustine and high-dose etoposide: a treatment regimen resulting in enhanced hepatic toxicity. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70:1464-1465.
    142) Yokel BK, Friedman KJ, Farmer ER, et al: Cutaneous pathology following etoposide therapy. J Cutan Pathol 1987; 14(6):326-330.
    143) Yosowitz P, Ekland DA, & Shaw RC: Peripheral intravenous infiltration necrosis. Ann Surg 1975; 182:553-556.
    144) de Souza P, Friedlander M, & Wilde C: Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 1994; 17:387-389.
    145) van der Gaast A, Sonneveld P, Mans DR, et al: Intrathecal administration of etoposide in the treatment of malignant meningitis: feasibility and pharmacokinetic data. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992; 29(4):335-337.