MOBILE VIEW  | 

ETHYLENE GLYCOL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Ethylene glycol is a dihydroxy alcohol derivative of the aliphatic hydrocarbons. It is referred to as a glycol because of its sweet taste.

Specific Substances

    1) Ethylene glycol
    2) 1,2-Ethanediol
    3) Glycol alcohol
    4) Glycol
    5) EG
    6) Molecular Formula: C2-H6-O2
    7) CAS 107-21-1
    8) NIOSH/RTECS KW 2975000
    9) ATHYLENGLYKOL
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C2-H6-O2

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Ethylene glycol is a colorless, clear, sweet- or bittersweet-tasting, viscous liquid. It is considerably hygroscopic; it is able to absorb twice its weight of water at 100% relative humidity (ACGIH, 1996; Ashford, 2001; Budavari, 2000).
    2) Ethylene glycol is available in two grades of purity: industrial grade and low-conductivity grade (CHRIS, 2002).
    B) SOURCES
    1) Ethylene glycol is produced in several ways: through hydration of ethylene oxide; by the oxidation of ethylene (in the presence of acetic acid to form ethylene diacetate which is hydrolyzed to the glycol, with the acetic acid being recycled in the process); from carbon monoxide and hydrogen from coal gasification; and via the Oxirane process (ACGIH, 1996; Ashford, 2001; Lewis, 2001a).
    2) WATER CONTAMINATION
    a) An epidemic of children who developed somnolence, vomiting, ataxia, crystalluria, and hematuria was associated with a contaminated water supply containing 9% ethylene glycol (MMWR, 1987).
    C) USES
    1) Ethylene glycol lowers the freezing point of water. More than 25 percent of the ethylene glycol produced is used in antifreeze and coolant mixtures for motor vehicles (this use may decrease in the coming years because of environmental concerns related to ethylene glycol released or spilled from motor vehicles). It is also used widely for aircraft deicing, and used in condensers and heat exchangers (ACGIH, 1996; Budavari, 2000; Lewis, 1998).
    a) Ethylene glycol may be mixed in Rodamine B solutions in the arctic and is used commonly to mark centerlines of roads and runways during snow and ice periods (Amstrup et al, 1989).
    2) It is also used as a solvent, an industrial humectant, and in hydraulic brake fluids. Large amounts are used as a chemical intermediate, especially in the production of polyester fibers, films, and resins (ACGIH, 1996; Budavari, 2000; Lewis, 1998).
    3) It has also been used as a glycerin substitute in commercial products such as paints, lacquers, detergents, and cosmetics (ACGIH, 1996; Budavari, 2000; Lewis, 1998).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Primarily used as an engine coolant (eg, antifreeze used in car radiators).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: No medical use.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Primary concern is the severe metabolic acidosis and nephrotoxicity from metabolites. Metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) to glycoaldehyde and then by aldehyde dehydrogenase to glycolic acid. Glycolic acid is metabolized by lactate dehydrogenase or glycolic acid oxidase to glyoxylic acid which can be metabolized to oxalic acid. Specifically, oxalic acid metabolite complexes with calcium to form calcium oxalate crystals in the renal tubules that can lead to acute renal failure. Other intermediate metabolites are believed to be nephrotoxic as well. May have CNS effects believed mediated through GABA receptors.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: There are thousands of exposures and several deaths every year reported to poison centers. Inadvertent pediatric ingestions rarely develop severe toxicity.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Initially, ethylene glycol ingestion may cause intoxication similar to ethanol with CNS depression, nystagmus, ataxia, and somnolence. Nausea and vomiting are also fairly common. If ethylene glycol metabolism is blocked early, there may be no other clinical manifestations.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: If ethylene glycol metabolism is not blocked early after a significant ingestion, patients develop increasing CNS depression (coma, hypotonia, hyporeflexia, eventually cerebral edema), anion gap metabolic acidosis (often severe, arterial pH less than 7 is common with severe ingestion), and renal failure. Seizures are common with severe toxicity, but usually not prolonged. Mild to moderate tachycardia is common, Kussmaul respirations develop with increasing acidosis, hypotension is rare. Hypocalcemia may result from precipitation of calcium oxalate crystals, which can (rarely) lead to cardiac dysrhythmias. In addition, there are reports of cranial nerve abnormalities developing 1 to 2 weeks post exposure in patients with severe intoxication, which may be secondary to calcium oxalate crystal formation in the brain.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypothermia has been reported.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Exposures to glycols have resulted in teratogenicity, specifically craniofacial and neural tube closure defects and skeletal dysplasia in animal studies.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) No data regarding carcinogenic effects in humans was found at the time of this review.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Obtain metabolic panel (serum electrolytes, including calcium), BUN and creatinine on all patients with a history of ingestion.
    B) Obtain blood ethanol and ethylene glycol concentration, if available. Can consider a measured serum osmolality level if ethylene glycol concentration is not available.
    C) Patients with significant toxicity should have arterial blood gas.
    D) Obtain urinalysis with microscopy for calcium oxalate crystals. Hematuria and proteinuria are also common. Monitor urine output.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes, renal function and ethylene glycol concentration. A peak ethylene glycol concentration < 20 mg/dL is commonly considered nontoxic. If the serum ethylene glycol concentration is >20 mg/dL, or there is a metabolic acidosis, or a history of a potentially toxic ingestion and ethylene glycol concentration is not rapidly available, administer an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor (either fomepizole or ethanol). In patients who present early after ingestion (before the development of metabolic acidosis), no further treatment may be required.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) CNS depression may require intubation; adequate minute ventilation must be insured to prevent abrupt worsening of acidemia. Alcohol-induced vasodilation and vomiting may lead to hypotension requiring fluid resuscitation. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) inhibition is the most specific treatment for patients with severe ethylene glycol toxicity. Blockade (using fomepizole or ethanol) allows for excretion of ethylene glycol without formation of toxic metabolites (ADH has a much higher affinity for ethanol or fomepizole than for ethylene glycol). In patients who present late with metabolic acidosis and for most patients with very high ethylene glycol concentrations, hemodialysis will be necessary after ADH inhibition. Hemodialysis is the most definitive therapy for ethylene glycol poisoning as it clears both ethylene glycol and its toxic metabolites from the blood and corrects any resulting metabolic acidosis. Indications for hemodialysis include metabolic acidosis (serum pH < 7.2), signs of end-organ toxicity (eg, seizures and coma), and renal failure. Thiamine and pyridoxine are also administered to encourage metabolism of ethylene glycol to less toxic metabolites.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: No prehospital activated charcoal; no utility for therapy. If there is a dermal or eye exposure, it would be reasonable for simple decontamination with water at home.
    2) HOSPITAL: Activated charcoal has no utility for ethylene glycol poisonings. Since ethylene glycol is a liquid, gastric lavage and whole bowel irrigation have no place in management. One could consider simple nasogastric tube aspiration for recent large ingestions, if the airway is protected.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Intubation may be indicated if the patient’s mental status is so depressed they cannot protect their airway. The ventilator should be adjusted to assure that the patient is able to maintain any respiratory compensation for the metabolic acidosis. Failure to maintain ventilation can result in a dramatic fall in pH and cardiovascular collapse.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) Treat patients with either fomepizole or ethanol to block production of the toxic metabolites of ethylene glycol. Indications include: a serum ethylene glycol concentration greater than 20 mg/dL; history of ethylene glycol ingestion with an osmolar gap greater than 10 mOsm/L (not accounted by ethanol or other alcohols); or a history or strong clinical suspicion of ethylene glycol ingestion and 2 of the following: serum bicarbonate less than 20 mEq/L, an arterial pH less than 7.3, or presence of oxalate crystals in the urine.
    a) FOMEPIZOLE vs ETHANOL: Fomepizole is easier to use clinically, requires less monitoring, does not cause CNS depression or hypoglycemia, and may obviate the need for dialysis in some patients. Ethanol requires continuous administration and frequent monitoring of serum ethanol and glucose levels, and may cause CNS depression and hypoglycemia (especially in children). The drug cost associated with ethanol use is generally much lower than with fomepizole; however, other costs associated with ethanol use (continuous intravenous infusion, hourly blood draws and ethanol levels, possibly greater use of hemodialysis) may make the costs more comparable.
    b) FOMEPIZOLE: Fomepizole is administered as a 15 mg/kg loading dose, followed by four bolus doses of 10 mg/kg every 12 hours. If therapy is needed beyond this 48 hour period, the dose is then increased to 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for as long as necessary. Fomepizole is also effectively removed by hemodialysis; therefore, doses should be repeated following each round of hemodialysis. In selected patients (those who present early, without metabolic acidosis or renal failure) hemodialysis may be avoided by use of intravenous fomepizole. In patients with high ethylene glycol concentrations, who are treated with fomepizole alone, several days may be required before ethylene glycol is eliminated by the kidneys; hemodialysis may be indicated.
    c) ETHANOL: Ethanol is given to maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% to 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line. Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated, followed by an infusion rate of 80 to 150 mg/kg/hr (for 10% ethanol, 0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr for a non-drinker; 1.5 mL/kg/hr for a chronic alcoholic). During hemodialysis, either add ethanol to the dialysate to achieve 100 mg/dL concentration or increase the rate of infusion during dialysis (for 10% ethanol, 2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr). Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentration. The loading dose is 0.8 grams/kg (4 mL/kg of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube. Maintenance dose is 80 to 150 mg/kg/hour (of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol; 0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hour for a non-drinker; 0.8 mL/kg/hour for a chronic alcoholic). Concentrations greater than 30% (60 proof) ethanol should be diluted. For both modalities, blood ethanol levels must be monitored hourly and adjusted accordingly, and both require patient monitoring in an ICU setting.
    d) THIAMINE: Administer 100 mg intravenously daily to stimulate the conversion of glyoxylate to alpha-hydroxy-beta-ketoadipate, a nontoxic metabolite.
    e) PYRIDOXINE: Administer 100 mg intravenously daily, to allow adequate stores of cofactor necessary for the conversion of glyoxylate to nontoxic glycine.
    F) SEIZURES
    1) Administer intravenous benzodiazepines, barbiturates.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is the definitive therapy for patients poisoned by toxic alcohols as it clears both the parent alcohol and the toxic metabolites from the blood. In addition, it corrects metabolic acidosis, electrolyte abnormalities, and maintains fluid balance. Indications for hemodialysis include: metabolic acidosis (pH <7.2) unresponsive to therapy; renal failure; ethylene glycol concentration of 50 mg/dL or more (unless patient is receiving fomepizole and is asymptomatic with normal arterial pH); deteriorating vital signs despite supportive care; electrolyte abnormalities not responding to conventional therapy. Many patients will require multiple courses of hemodialysis to clear ethylene glycol, and dosing of ethanol and fomepizole must be increased during hemodialysis.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: An AAPCC consensus guideline recommends that children with an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or a known inadvertent ingestion of less than 10 mL in an adult can be monitored at home. All other exposures, including unwitnessed exposures or intentional misuse (eg; suicide, malicious use), should be referred to a healthcare facility. If it has been more than 24 hours since a potentially toxic exposure, and the patient is asymptomatic with no alcohol coingestion, no referral is required. Inhalation, dermal and ocular exposures generally do not develop systemic toxicity and can be monitored at home unless significant irritation develops.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: An AAPCC consensus guideline recommends that children with more than an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or an adult with known inadvertent ingestion of a "swallow" (10 to 30 mL) or more should be referred immediately to a healthcare facility. Refer any patients with symptoms of ethylene glycol poisoning (eg, vomiting, slurred speech, ataxia, altered mental status) to a healthcare facility . Patients who have no acidosis, normal renal function and a nontoxic ethylene glycol concentration may be discharged. If it is not possible to measure ethylene glycol concentrations, it is reasonable to observe patients who have undetectable serum ethanol concentrations for a minimum of 8 hours. During this period, the serum pH, bicarbonate and creatinine should be monitored every 2 hours. If the patient has no symptoms, no metabolic acidosis and normal renal function after 8 to 12 hours of observation, the risk of significant ethylene glycol toxicity is very low.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Any patient showing definitive signs of ethylene glycol poisoning (worsening renal function, metabolic acidosis, etc.) should be admitted to the hospital. Patients who have co-ingested ethanol will likely require admission if serum ethylene glycol concentrations cannot be measured, as these patients may not develop toxicity for more than 12 hours after presentation. Any patient receiving ethanol therapy requires an ICU admission. Any patient that is otherwise well and receiving fomepizole therapy should be safe in a less monitored setting (may require monitoring for suicide risk).
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult your local poison center for any ethylene glycol exposure, especially those requiring antidote treatment, hemodialysis, or if the history is unclear.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) A normal osmolar gap does NOT rule out a significant ethylene glycol exposure. The Wood’s lamp testing of urine for fluorescence to confirm or eliminate ethylene glycol exposure is NOT reliable. Laboratory and clinical findings change during the course of toxicity. Early in the course of severe poisonings, ethylene glycol concentration (and usually osmolar gap) are high, anion gap is low, and signs and symptoms are limited to inebriation and GI irritation. Late in the course of severe intoxication, severe anion gap acidosis is present along with severe CNS depression, renal insufficiency and calcium oxalate crystalluria, but ethylene glycol concentration and osmolar gap may be low.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Ethylene glycol has a half-life of 3 to 5 hours via metabolism by ADH (zero-order kinetics). In the setting of ADH blockade, elimination is entirely renal with a half-life of approximately 17 hours. Ethylene is well absorbed orally and is not protein bound, with a volume of distribution of about 0.8 L/kg.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) CNS depression: Other toxic alcohols, benzodiazepines, opiates/opioids, antipsychotic medications, etc.
    2) Elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis: Ketones, uremia, lactic acidosis, other toxins (iron, methanol, etc.), or alcoholic ketoacidosis.
    3) Renal injury: Other nephrotoxic drugs (eg, NSAIDs, aminoglycoside antibiotics), dehydration, etc.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) INHALATION: Move patient to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty breathing develops, evaluate for respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis. Administer oxygen and assist ventilation as required. Treat bronchospasm with an inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: A consensus guideline recommends that children with more than an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or an adult with known accidental ingestion of more than a "swallow" (10 to 30 mL) should be referred immediately to a healthcare facility. Ingestions of 0.20 mL/kg of 95% ethylene glycol could theoretically cause a blood concentration in the toxic range (greater than 25 mg/dL). The approximate lethal oral dose of 95% ethylene glycol is 1.5 mL/kg.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Primarily used as an engine coolant (eg, antifreeze used in car radiators).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: No medical use.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Primary concern is the severe metabolic acidosis and nephrotoxicity from metabolites. Metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) to glycoaldehyde and then by aldehyde dehydrogenase to glycolic acid. Glycolic acid is metabolized by lactate dehydrogenase or glycolic acid oxidase to glyoxylic acid which can be metabolized to oxalic acid. Specifically, oxalic acid metabolite complexes with calcium to form calcium oxalate crystals in the renal tubules that can lead to acute renal failure. Other intermediate metabolites are believed to be nephrotoxic as well. May have CNS effects believed mediated through GABA receptors.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: There are thousands of exposures and several deaths every year reported to poison centers. Inadvertent pediatric ingestions rarely develop severe toxicity.
    E) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Initially, ethylene glycol ingestion may cause intoxication similar to ethanol with CNS depression, nystagmus, ataxia, and somnolence. Nausea and vomiting are also fairly common. If ethylene glycol metabolism is blocked early, there may be no other clinical manifestations.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: If ethylene glycol metabolism is not blocked early after a significant ingestion, patients develop increasing CNS depression (coma, hypotonia, hyporeflexia, eventually cerebral edema), anion gap metabolic acidosis (often severe, arterial pH less than 7 is common with severe ingestion), and renal failure. Seizures are common with severe toxicity, but usually not prolonged. Mild to moderate tachycardia is common, Kussmaul respirations develop with increasing acidosis, hypotension is rare. Hypocalcemia may result from precipitation of calcium oxalate crystals, which can (rarely) lead to cardiac dysrhythmias. In addition, there are reports of cranial nerve abnormalities developing 1 to 2 weeks post exposure in patients with severe intoxication, which may be secondary to calcium oxalate crystal formation in the brain.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypothermia has been reported.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypothermia (33 degrees Celsius) was reported following an accidental ingestion of 200 to 300 g ethylene glycol (Jobard et al, 1996).

Heent

    3.4.2) HEAD
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) FACIAL PARALYSIS: Bilateral facial paralysis has been described after ethylene glycol poisoning (Berger & Ayyar, 1981; Fellman, 1982; Mallya et al, 1986; Factor & Lava, 1987; Palmer et al, 1989; Anderson, 1990; Spillane et al, 1991).
    a) This is usually accompanied by other cranial nerve deficits (deafness, ophthalmoplegia, dysphagia) and occurs 6 to 18 days after ingestion (Berger & Ayyar, 1981; Mallya et al, 1986; Anderson, 1990; Spillane et al, 1991; Lewis et al, 1997).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 37-year old man developed Guillain-Barre type syndrome including complete bilateral facial paralysis along with other sensorineural deficits after he inadvertently ingested food and beverages laced with a large amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. After ingestion, he was admitted to a hospital and remained comatose for 10 weeks. Treatment included renal dialysis 3 times weekly. His facial paralyses resolved completely (time frame unknown) (Dezso et al, 2011).
    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) NYSTAGMUS may occur (Vasavada et al, 2003; Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962).
    a) Inhalation of ethylene glycol vapor was associated with episodes of nystagmus, loss of consciousness, and lymphocytosis in 9 workers (Troisi, 1950).
    2) STRABISMUS has been reported (Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962; Grant, 1993).
    3) OPHTHALMOPLEGIAS may occur (Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962).
    4) PAPILLEDEMA has been reported (Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962; Grant, 1993).
    5) CONJUNCTIVITIS: Brief ocular exposure may result in immediate discomfort with mild temporary conjunctival inflammation but no significant corneal damage (Grant, 1993).
    6) MYDRIASIS has been reported following ingestion (Kralova et al, 2006).
    7) BLINDNESS: CASE REPORT: A 37-year old man developed permanent bilateral vision loss along with other sensorineural deficits after he inadvertently ingested food and beverages laced with a large amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. After ingestion, he was admitted to a hospital and remained comatose for 10 weeks during which time he received treatment including renal dialysis 3 times weekly. One year after ingestion he remained completely blind in the left eye and had partial loss to the right eye (Dezso et al, 2011).
    8) RETINAL INJURY is reported in rabbits, with associated changes in the electroretinogram and deposition of crystals in the ganglion cells (Rossa & Weber, 1990).
    3.4.4) EARS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HEARING LOSS: A 37-year-old man developed bilateral sensorineural deafness along with other sensorineural deficits after he inadvertently ingested food and beverages laced with a large amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. After ingestion, he was admitted to a hospital and remained comatose for 10 weeks. Treatment included renal dialysis 3 times weekly. One year after ingestion he regained some ability to hear after undergoing successful bilateral cochlear implantations (Dezso et al, 2011).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) IRRITATION: Inadvertent inhalation of aerosolized ethylene glycol has resulted in throat irritation (Wezorek et al, 1995).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PULMONARY EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cardiogenic pulmonary edema may occur with severe poisoning (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974; Denning et al, 1988).
    B) CARDIOMEGALY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cardiomegaly has been reported (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974).
    C) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cardiorespiratory arrest is most commonly associated with severe metabolic and fluid electrolyte abnormalities (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974).
    D) MYOCARDITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Myocarditis was reported in a 42-year-old man with an ethylene glycol level of 40 mg/dL on admission. Metabolic acidosis, cardiogenic shock, and renal failure were present, without neurologic findings (Denning et al, 1988).
    E) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In two fatal cases of ethylene glycol ingestion, fragmentation of the normal striation in heart cells was found (Karlson-Stiber & Persson, 1992).
    F) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypertension (186/110 mmHg) has been reported following ingestion of antifreeze (Walder & Tyler, 1994) and in other ethylene glycol poisonings (Kralova et al, 2006; Eder et al, 1998).
    G) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension, which may progress to cardiogenic shock, may occur following ingestion (Jobard et al, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old chronic alcoholic man developed shock, hypotonic coma, seizures, hypothermia, and anuria following accidental ingestion of 200 to 300 grams ethylene glycol. In spite of symptomatic therapy, hemodynamic instability persisted and the patient died 48 hours after admission (Jobard et al, 1996).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old man, admitted to the emergency department after an ethylene glycol ingestion, was acidotic and hypotensive, resistant to multiple doses of sodium bicarbonate. Cardiogenic shock ensued and the patient died 24 hours after admission (Donovan et al, 1997).
    H) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old chronic alcoholic presented with large QRS complexes recorded on ECG and a flat EEG after being found (approximate time of exposure could not be determined) following accidental ingestion of 200 to 300 grams ethylene glycol (Jobard et al, 1996).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Delayed onset of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was described 6 days after ingestion of ethylene glycol (Haupt et al, 1988) and in other cases (Piagnerelli et al, 1999; Catchings et al, 1985).
    b) Adult respiratory distress syndrome was described on the first hospital day following an ingestion of ethylene glycol. Chest x-ray revealed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates; the PaO2/FIO2 ratio was below 200, and a pulmonary artery occlusive pressure (PAOP) was 10 mmHg with a high cardiac index (6.87 L/min/m(2)). Treatment included 100% FIO2 ventilation for 2 days and PEEP for 7 days (Piagnerelli et al, 1999; Piagnerelli et al, 1999a). The patient made a complete recovery with no apparent sequelae.
    B) HYPERVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperventilation may occur 12 to 24 hours post-ingestion as a response to the development of metabolic acidosis (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974; Kralova et al, 2006).
    C) IRRITATION SYMPTOM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Twenty prisoners were exposed to mean daily concentrations of ethylene glycol between 3 and 67 mg/m(3) for 20 to 22 hours/day for 1 month. The most frequently reported complaint was irritation of the upper respiratory tract, including an intolerable strong irritation of the upper respiratory tract (Wills et al, 1974).
    D) COUGH
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A burning sensation along the trachea associated with a burning cough was reported when the concentration of ethylene glycol was momentarily increased to 200 mg/m(3) (Wills et al, 1974).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) STUPOR
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INEBRIATION: Slurred speech, ataxia, and somnolence are frequent early findings (Parry & Wallach, 1974). CNS effects are similar to ethanol intoxication.
    B) CRANIAL NERVE DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORTS: There are multiple case reports of cranial nerve deficit development 6 to 18 days following apparent recovery from ethylene glycol poisoning (Berger & Ayyar, 1981; Fellman, 1982; Mallya et al, 1986; Factor & Lava, 1987; Palmer et al, 1989; Anderson, 1990; Spillane et al, 1991; Zhou et al, 2002).
    b) Deficits observed include dysarthria, dysphagia, facial weakness, anisocoria, ataxia, facial diplegia, hearing loss, absent gag reflex, or defects of cranial nerves II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XII.
    c) The amount of ethylene glycol ingested was more than 100 mL in patients for whom ingestion histories were obtained.
    d) At least 7 patients were dialyzed (Berger & Ayyar, 1981; Fellman, 1982; Spillane et al, 1991; Zhou et al, 2002) and at least 3 of these received intravenous ethanol and bicarbonate. Treatment was not reported for 4 patients (Mallya et al, 1986; Palmer et al, 1989). One patient who presented three days after ingestion was not treated (Factor & Lava, 1987).
    C) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Coma may occur if large amounts have been ingested or treatment is delayed or inadequate (Bey et al, 2002; Berman et al, 1957; Bobbitt et al, 1986; Jobard et al, 1996). Coma is most common within hours of the ingestion but can occur at any time. Onset of coma was reported four days after ingestion in one case (Haupt et al, 1988). A 37-year old man remained comatose for 10 weeks after inadvertently ingesting food and beverages laced with a large amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. He sustained permanent renal failure and hearing and vision loss but no cognitive deficits (Dezso et al, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) A 28-year-old pregnant woman (26 weeks gestation) presented with speech difficulties, seizures, and hyperventilation, progressively deteriorating into a coma. Suspecting eclampsia and possible fetal asphyxia, a cesarean section was performed. Blood gas analysis obtained postoperatively revealed severe metabolic acidosis. A serum tox screen indicated ethylene glycol poisoning, with an ethylene glycol level of 2480 mg/L. The patient admitted drinking approximately 400 mL of ethylene glycol. The patient gradually recovered following hemodialysis and administration of ethanol (Kralova et al, 2006).
    2) A 44-year-old woman became comatose after ingesting an unknown amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. Arterial blood gases revealed metabolic acidosis and urine sediment contained calcium oxalate crystals. Despite aggressive treatment with fomepizole, sodium bicarbonate, and hemodialysis, the patient died 8 days after ingestion. Following her death, her liver, heart, and lungs were successfully transplanted into other patients (Wolff et al, 2005).
    3) A 41-year-old man was found comatose after ingesting an unknown amount of antifreeze in a suicide attempt. The patient presented with several seizures and initial laboratory data showed a pH of 6.84, pCO2 of 13.7 mmHg, HCO3 of 2.3 mEq/L, and a calculated anion gap of 27 mEq/L. A serum ethylene glycol level, obtained 24 hours after ingestion, was 9.7 mg/dL. Despite hemodialysis and bicarbonate infusion, an EEG showed no electrical activity and the patient was declared brain dead 48 hours after ingestion (Dy-Liacco et al, 2003).
    4) A clinical presentation mimicking brain death in a suspected case of ethylene glycol ingestion was reported. Twelve days after admission, the patient was unresponsive to stimulus, with all brainstem reflexes being absent, and he had a flaccid tetraparesis. Nerve biopsy studies revealed severe axonal degeneration. Recovery was slow; the patient walked with crutches after 16 months. Although at the time of initial presentation, urine analysis showed oxalate crystals, no detectable serum ethylene glycol was found in serum samples (Tobe et al, 2002).
    5) A 23-year-old man became comatose after ingesting an unknown amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. The initial plasma ethylene glycol level was 116.2 mg/dL. Despite aggressive supportive therapy, including mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, ethanol infusion, and sodium bicarbonate administration, the patient developed cardiogenic shock and died 27 hours after ingestion (Hantson et al, 2002).
    D) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures, which may quickly develop, and death may occur if large amounts have been ingested (Froberg et al, 2006; Dy-Liacco et al, 2003; Berman et al, 1957; Jobard et al, 1996; Faessel et al, 1995a).
    b) CASE REPORT: Grand mal seizures occurred in a 28-year-old man after ingestion of 500 mL antifreeze, 60 Co-Proxamol tablets, and a bottle of whiskey. Despite treatment with anticonvulsants, veno-venous hemodiafiltration, and supportive measures, the patient expired after 24 hours. Another patient was reported to have recurrent grand mal seizures following ingestion of 500 to 2000 mL (Walder & Tyler, 1994).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old pregnant woman (26 weeks gestation) presented with speech difficulties, seizures, and hyperventilation, progressively deteriorating into a coma. Suspecting eclampsia and possible fetal asphyxia, a cesarean section was performed. Blood gas analysis obtained postoperatively revealed severe metabolic acidosis. A serum tox screen indicated ethylene glycol poisoning, with a serum ethylene glycol level of 2480 mg/L. The patient admitted drinking approximately 400 mL of ethylene glycol. The patient gradually recovered following hemodialysis and administration of ethanol (Kralova et al, 2006).
    E) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cerebral edema has been reported (Bobbitt et al, 1986; Haupt et al, 1988; Maier, 1983).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man who experienced diffuse brain stem and cerebellum swelling with no focal lesions on CT of the brain after ingestion of 500 to 2000 mL antifreeze. Brainstem death was confirmed on the 7th day (Walder & Tyler, 1994).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old man was found unresponsive after intentional ingestion of antifreeze and presented to the emergency department approximately 16 hours later with hyperventilation, tachycardia, a metabolic acidosis (pH 7.059) and high anion gap (36 mmol/L). A few hours after admission, the patient developed generalized seizures which were refractory to therapy, and a head CT revealed generalized cerebral edema. The patient expired within 24 hours of admission. Autopsy results showed oxalate crystals in the renal tubules and in small vessels of the brain, and the authors speculated that endothelial damage from the oxalate crystals may have been the cause of this patient's cerebral edema (Froberg et al, 2006).
    F) NEUROLOGICAL FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Delayed or inadequately treated ethylene glycol ingestions have resulted in cerebral edema, basal ganglia and thalamic lesions, and partial or total herniation syndromes (Ford et al, 1998).
    b) CRANIAL CT FINDINGS: A broad area of decreased attenuation in the mediobasilar portions of the brain and diffuse cerebral edema were associated with acute ethylene glycol intoxication (Zeiss et al, 1989). This pattern is neither believed to be diagnostic of ethylene glycol poisoning nor a barometer of clinical course or prognosis.
    c) CASE REPORT: A case of brainstem and midbrain dysfunction verified by head CT results (obtained 3 days after ingestion) occurred in a 26-year-old man following an ingestion of 2 L of antifreeze. Bilateral putamen necrosis was reported on MRI of the brain 24 days after ingestion. Over the next 4 months, neurologic sequelae, including sixth nerve palsies, resolved (Morgan et al, 2000).
    d) CASE REPORT/OSMOTIC DEMYELINATION SYNDROME: A 64-year-old woman presented with depressed mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7). Laboratory data revealed metabolic acidosis with an anion gap of 39 (reference range less than 17), a plasma sodium concentration of 150 mEq/L (reference range 135 to 145 mEq/L), a whole blood lactate concentration of 32 mEq/L (reference range 0.5 to 2.2 mEq/L), a plasma osmolality of 536 mOsm/kg (reference range 275 to 295 mOsm/kg) with a osmolal gap of 218 mOsm/kg (reference range less than 16 mOsm/kg), and a negative elevated blood alcohol level (less than 10 mg/dL). Suspecting a toxic alcohol ingestion, based on the patient's neurological status, her elevated lactate and osmolality concentrations, and a negative blood alcohol result, gas chromatographic analysis was conducted, demonstrating a plasma ethylene glycol concentration of 1055.5 mg/dL. Following fomepizole therapy, 750 mg IV every 12 hours, as well as thiamine administration and intermittent hemodialysis, the patient's mental status improved slightly with resolution of the metabolic acidosis and the osmolal gap. However, she experienced alternating agitation and somnolence, and hyperreflexia with bilateral weakness. An MRI of the brain revealed abnormal T2 prolongation in the thalamus, posterior hippocampus, and central pons. Based on the patient's MRI results and her history, a diagnosis of osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) was made. With supportive care, the patient made a full neurologic and physiologic recovery with no permanent sequelae (Ahmed et al, 2014).
    1) It is suggested that the development of ODS may have been due to the rapid development of hyperosmolality secondary to ethylene glycol ingestion and its sudden correction (Ahmed et al, 2014).
    G) DISORDER OF BRAIN STEM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Brainstem infarction and quadriplegia following intentional ingestion of ethylene glycol was reported in a 17-year-old man. Bilateral basal ganglia and brainstem infarcts were seen on head and cervical spine MR scan. A repeat MR scan the following day revealed absent cerebral blood flow, diffuse cortical ischemia, and bilateral uncal herniation (Dribben et al, 1999).
    1) The authors suggest the possibility of ethylene glycol causing direct neurotoxic effects on the brainstem.
    H) NEUROLOGICAL DEFICIT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) PARKINSON'S SYNDROME
    1) CASE REPORT: 68-year-old man with a mental history significant for bipolar disease intentionally ingested an unknown volume of antifreeze and presented with confusion, ataxia, and speech disturbances. He had a metabolic acidosis (pH 7.26), a high anion gap (28 mEq/L), and an EG plasma concentration of 2523 mg/L. With aggressive treatment and hemodialysis, the patient's clinical status improved, although he showed neurological deficits. By day 9 of admission, the patient had many features of Parkinson's syndrome (bradykinesia, hurried gait, drooling, cogwheel rigidity, and tremor). MRI findings showed hemorrhagic necrosis, and the patient was started on carbidopa/levodopa, with some symptom improvement. Four years later the patient still has a Parkinsonian gait and moderate cogwheel rigidity (Reddy et al, 2007).
    I) HYPOREFLEXIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Depressed reflexes have been reported (Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962). Flaccid paresis has been reported (Ford et al, 1998).
    J) MYOCLONUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Myoclonic jerks and tetanic contractions may occur (Pons & Custer, 1946; Vale et al, 1976; Friedman et al, 1962; Faessel et al, 1995a).
    K) SEQUELA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) PERMANENT NEUROLOGIC INJURY: Central nervous system damage and associated circulatory disturbances have caused death in several cases (Rzepecki & Fabicka, 1992). Cerebral damage may be permanent, and persistent cognitive and motor deficits have been reported.
    1) CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old woman with a history of major depressive disorder presented unresponsive to verbal stimuli, with severe metabolic acidosis and urine findings consistent with ethylene glycol toxicity (calcium oxalate crystals). Intentional ethylene glycol poisoning was confirmed by her husband. With aggressive care, the patient was extubated and showed improved mental status by hospital day 3. An MRI of the brain on hospital day 5 revealed nonspecific cerebellar white matter abnormalities, and the patient demonstrated retrograde amnesia. A neuropsychological profile was done about 3 weeks after ingestion and showed global cognitive impairment. A 6 month follow-up visit indicated slight improvement in cognitive function, although many attention, processing, and memory deficits remained. A repeat MRI during the visit was normal. Baseline mental status data for the patient prior to exposure was not available, yet the authors suspect that ethylene glycol toxicity can cause lasting neuropsychic sequelae regardless of normal imaging findings (Freilich et al, 2007).
    L) INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A 50-year-old alcoholic man developed bipallidal hemorrhage associated with an episode of ethylene glycol intoxication (ethylene glycol concentration 6.06 mmol/L; toxic greater than 1.6 mmol/L) (Caparros-Lefebvre et al, 2005). He presented with loss of consciousness, then drowsiness and inability to speak.
    b) CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man presented as comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale of 4) after inadvertently ingesting antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. CT and MR scans of the brain demonstrated bilateral hemorrhagic infarctions of the basal ganglia with restricted diffusion within the external capsule. In addition to the neurologic findings, the patient also developed acute renal failure with lactic acidosis, aspiration bronchopneumonia, and hypocalcemia. With supportive care, the patient's condition gradually improved; however, he died approximately 4 weeks after admission due to severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Corr & Szolics, 2012).
    M) FEELING AGGRESSIVE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORTS: Two patients (a 24-year-old and a 35-year-old) presented to the emergency department after subcutaneously injecting 40 mL and 60 mL, respectively, of ethylene glycol-containing antifreeze. The patients became confused, combative, and, in the case of patient #2, subsequently unresponsive, approximately 1 hour after presentation. With fomepizole administration and supportive care, both patients gradually recovered without sequelae (Murphy et al, 2013).
    N) CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 58-year-old man presented to the emergency department with acute left-sided weakness and left visual field defect indicative of a stroke. His medical history included hypertension, seizures, chronic kidney disease, depression and a previous suicide attempt. Physical examination revealed confusion, an odor of acetone, tachycardia, and tachypnea. Arterial blood gas analysis indicated metabolic acidosis, and a brain MRI revealed several acute infarctions with cerebral edema. The patient rapidly deteriorated, becoming comatose and necessitating intubation. Following a report that a bottle of antifreeze was found near him at his home, therapy was initiated and included fomepizole, IV sodium bicarbonate and emergent hemodialysis. Laboratory data revealed a serum ethylene glycol level of 24 mg/dL and urinalysis was positive for calcium oxalate crystals. Over the next three days, there was no neurological improvement and the patient died following a family decision to withdraw life support (Garg et al, 2015).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Nausea, vomiting, hematemesis, and abdominal pain are frequent early findings following ingestions (Moossavi et al, 2003; Parry & Wallach, 1974).
    B) VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY OF INTESTINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: An unusual case of ischemic hemorrhagic bowel necrosis with abdominal pain and lactic acidosis has been reported in a 60-year-old chronic alcoholic man with a serum EG level greater than 20 mg/dL. Following fomepizole therapy and surgery for bowel resection and anastomosis, the patient improved. Relationship between the bowel necrosis and ethylene glycol ingestion is unclear (Singh et al, 2001).
    1) One group of authors disputes the relationship between the above patient's mesenteric ischemia and a suspected EG ingestion. They postulate that the patient had an elevated lactate level caused by his mesenteric ischemia, and it is this elevated lactate level that produced a falsely elevated EG concentration (Barrueto & Nelson, 2002).
    C) ISCHEMIC COLITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old man presented to the hospital with hypotension and was unresponsive following acute ethylene glycol intoxication. His initial plasma ethylene glycol concentration was 2860 mg/L. During hospitalization, the patient developed mild ischemic colitis. He gradually recovered following hemodialysis and intravenous administration of ethanol and dopamine. Approximately 4 weeks later, the patient presented to the emergency department with dyspnea and decreased consciousness. Naloxone administration improved his mental status. A chest radiograph showed right lower lobe consolidation indicating aspiration pneumonia, possibly due to a narcotic overdose. Six days after hospital admission, the patient experienced intermittent lower abdominal pain. Stool was guaiac positive. An abdominal CT scan demonstrated a colonic stricture and a colonoscopy revealed a stenosis with an edematous transverse colon and the lumen filled with blood. Microscopic examination of the colon, following a subtotal colectomy, showed translucent, polyhedral crystals within the inflamed tissue, consistent with oxalate deposition.
    1) It is believed that the patient developed colonic ischemia and subsequent stricture formation with calcium oxalate crystal deposition in the colonic mucosa following his initial ethylene glycol intoxication. The development of the stricture, compounded by the patient's opioid use, resulted in intestinal stenosis and perforation that occurred following his second hospitalization (Gardner et al, 2004).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CRYSTALLURIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) OXALATE CRYSTALS
    1) The presence of calcium oxalate crystals highly suggests ethylene glycol poisoning. Signs and symptoms of renal insufficiency predominate at 2 to 3 days post-ingestion. Severe ethylene glycol toxicity can occur in the absence of crystalluria (Hantson et al, 2002; Boyer et al, 2001; Baum et al, 2000; Curtin et al, 1992; Haupt et al, 1988).
    2) Calcium oxalate crystals commonly occur in two forms: monohydrate and dihydrate crystals. The monohydrate crystals are needle-shaped and closely resemble sodium urate crystals. The dihydrate crystals are envelope-shaped and are more specific for EG poisoning (Huhn & Rosenberg, 1995; Olivero, 1993).
    B) ABNORMAL URINE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Calcium oxaluria, hematuria, and proteinuria are frequently reported (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974). Fluorescent urine is often seen when viewed with a Wood's lamp following antifreeze ingestion. However, fluorescent urine is not a reliable indicator of ethylene glycol ingestion, due to variations in interpretation of urine fluorescence among observers and the fact that most normal urine specimens exhibit some degree of fluorescence (Casavant et al, 2001).
    b) Microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, but no formation of calcium oxalate crystals were reported in 3 of 3 cases following ingestion of brake oil containing a mixture of glycols (Sharma & Jain, 2002).
    C) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness with oliguria, proteinuria, and anuria are common (Friedman et al, 1962). A spectrum of renal injury has been reported and may vary from acute tubular necrosis to proteinuria, hematuria, calcium oxaluria with mild increase in BUN, to prolonged and permanent anuria and azotemia (Nzerue et al, 1999; Buell et al, 1998; Berman et al, 1957). Complete recovery of renal function may follow anuria and oliguria.
    1) In a review of 36 severe suicidal ethylene glycol ingestions, it was found that the degree of acidosis, and not the serum ethylene glycol concentration, correlated with both kidney damage and outcome. This is not surprising because the acidic metabolites are nephrotoxic, and not the parent ethylene glycol compound (Karlson-Stiber & Persson, 1992).
    b) One study looked at the in vitro activity of EG metabolites (oxalate, glycolate, glyoxylate, and glycolaldehyde) in human proximal tubule cells and resulting cytotoxicity of these metabolites to the cells. The results showed that calcium oxalate dose-dependently caused toxicity in renal tissue, while the other metabolites did not have harmful activity. The authors concluded that calcium oxalate is the toxic metabolite responsible for the renal failure observed in EG ingestions (Guo et al, 2007).
    c) PREDICTIVE FACTORS: A retrospective, observational study from the California Poison Control System over a period of 10 years (1999 to 2008) was conducted to determine if there were predictive indicators associated with the outcomes of prolonged renal insufficiency (defined as kidney injury in which dialysis was required for more than 3 days after presentation) and death in patients with ethylene glycol poisoning. A total of 121 patients were identified with confirmed ethylene glycol poisoning and were divided into 2 groups: 59 patients (D/RI) who had either died (9 patients) or who had prolonged renal insufficiency (50 patients) and 62 patients (RECOV) who had an uncomplicated recovery. Analysis of the 2 groups showed that the D/RI group, compared to the RECOV group, were significantly more likely to present with somnolence or coma (98.3% vs 66.1%; odds ratio (OR) 29.71 (3.8 to 229.7) p < 0.01), develop seizures (40.7% vs 0%; p < 0.01), and require intubation (81.4% vs 17.7%; OR 20.23 (8.03 to 51) p < 0.01). Also, compared to the RECOV group, the D/RI group had a lower mean pH (7.03 vs 7.27; p < 0.01), a higher mean initial serum creatinine (1.7 mg/dL vs 1 mg/dL; p < 0.01), and a higher mean peak serum creatinine 24 hours later (2.4 mg/dL vs 1.1 mg/dL; p < 0.01), all of which suggest that clinical signs of coma, seizures, and acidosis may be predictive factors in determining the outcomes of prolonged renal insufficiency and death in patients with ethylene glycol poisoning (Lung et al, 2015).
    d) CASE SERIES
    1) In a prospective series of 19 patients with ethylene glycol poisoning, the development of renal insufficiency correlated with the severity of acidosis, the time from ingestion to initiation of therapy with an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor, and the plasma glycolate level (Brent et al, 1999).
    2) Three men (ages 30 to 40) developed decreased urine output and renal failure (urea 53.6 to 71.4 mmol/L and creatinine 371.2 to 972.4 mcmol/L) 24 to 72 hours after ingesting 40 to 100 ml of brake oil containing a mixture of glycols, followed by consumption of 80 to 100 ml whisky or rum. Renal biopsy on Case 1 showed acute tubular necrosis. Hemodialysis was performed immediately and up to 15 times in Case 1. All 3 patients were discharged 1 to 5 weeks later in satisfactory condition (Sharma & Jain, 2002).
    e) CASE REPORTS
    1) A 37-year-old man developed permanent renal failure after he inadvertently ingested food and beverages laced with a large amount of antifreeze containing ethylene glycol. After ingestion, he was admitted to a hospital and remained comatose for 10 weeks. While hospitalized he also developed Guillain-Barre type syndrome with bilateral sensorineural deafness, complete bilateral facial paralysis, and complete loss of vision to his left eye with subtotal loss to the right eye. Treatment included renal dialysis 3 times weekly. His facial paralyses resolved completely (time frame unknown). However, 1 year after ingestion, his hearing and vision loss, as well as renal failure, continued to persist. Treatment with dialysis 3 days/week continued with plans for a renal transplant. He regained some ability to hear after undergoing successful bilateral cochlear implantations (Dezso et al, 2011).
    2) Acute renal failure was reported in a 28-year-old woman who ingested 400 mL of ethylene glycol. Improvement in renal function occurred following treatment with continuous venovenous high-flux hemodialysis (Kralova et al, 2006).
    3) A case of acute renal failure in an 18-year-old man following an accidental ingestion of a small amount antifreeze has been reported. Spontaneous emesis occurred shortly after ingestion. Treatment with hemodialysis, once daily for 8 days, resulted in resolution of his renal dysfunction. Clinical features in this case were mild with the exception of the rapid-onset renal failure (Tadokoro et al, 1995).
    D) OSMOTIC DIURESIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old woman presented 3 hours following a witnessed ingestion of EG-containing antifreeze. Initial labs revealed a metabolic acidosis (serum pH 7.3), high anion gap (29 mEq/L), and osmol gap (344.5 mOsm/L). Fomepizole therapy was initiated, along with sodium bicarbonate. Twelve hours later, the patient had a urine output greater than 11.5 liters. This osmotic diuresis resulted in the patient's serum sodium rising to 174 mEq/L, despite massive fluid replacement efforts. Hemodialysis was initiated, and the patient's recovery was not complicated by renal or CNS sequelae (Pizon & Brooks, 2006).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RENAL TUBULAR DISORDER
    a) Dogs administered sublethal doses of ethylene glycol developed renal cortex ultrastructural lesions which were most common in the proximal convoluted tubules. Dilation of the distal convoluted tubules was also present and/or the tubules were packed with cellular debris (Smith et al, 1990).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Increased anion gap metabolic acidosis results from the metabolism of ethylene glycol to acidic metabolites, predominantly glycolic acid. (Remember: Within the first few hours after ingestion, the absence of an increased anion gap metabolic acidosis does NOT rule out ethylene glycol poisoning). Diagnosis may be suggested by a normochloremic anion gap metabolic acidosis combined with a high osmolar gap.
    1) A retrospective study of 234 ethylene glycol (EG) intoxicated patients tested the hypothesis that all patients who ingested EG would develop acidosis. The study demonstrated that all patients with significant EG ingestion manifested acidosis unless alcohol dehydrogenase was blocked (coingestion of ethanol), or the patient presented prior to 4 hours (before metabolism of EG produced acidosis) after ingestion (Jolliff et al, 2001).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman was reported to have severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.77), with high anion gap (25 mEq/L) and osmolal gap (60 mOsm/kg), two hours after ingestion of a product containing ethylene glycol. Ethanol therapy was initiated. Renal failure necessitated 2 weeks of hemodialysis. The patient recovered without sequelae (Piagnerelli et al, 1999).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old woman was reported to have metabolic acidosis (arterial blood pH of 7.17), with high anion gap (25 mmol/L) and osmolal gap (61 mOsm/kg) after admitting to ingesting ethylene glycol. Measured ethylene glycol level was 202 mg/dL. Following aggressive hydration and fomepizole therapy, renal function remained normal, and acidosis resolved with 24 hours (Najafi et al, 2001).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old man was admitted to the hospital 10 hours after ingestion of approximately 100 mL of antifreeze solution. Laboratory tests revealed severe metabolic acidosis (arterial blood pH of 7.05) with serum osmolality of 333 mOsm/L and calculated serum osmolarity of 317 mOsm/L. Sodium bicarbonate and ethanol infusions were maintained until resolution of anion gap. The patient made a complete recovery (Jeong et al, 2000).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old woman developed profound acidemia (arterial blood pH of 6.46) following ingestion of 720 mL of antifreeze(Blakeley et al, 1993). Therapy with ethanol and hemodialysis was initiated. Renal failure did not occur, and the patient completely recovered.
    f) CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old man developed an arterial pH of 6.58 14 hours following an ingestion of radiator fluid containing ethylene glycol. The patient presented to the emergency department in a comatose state with a blood ethylene glycol concentration of 242 mg/dL, lactate level of 5.7 mmol/L, and a core temperature of 30.9 degrees Celsius. After an intravenous infusion of 10% ethanol in 5% dextrose and 8 hemodialysis treatments, the patient was discharged approximately 23 days after ingestion (Bey et al, 2002).
    g) CASE REPORT: Two patients, with delayed hospital admission, presented with metabolic acidosis, arterial pH of 7.10 and 6.96, respectively, and without an elevated serum osmol gap. Subsequent laboratory tests revealed significant levels of ethylene glycol. Both patients were treated (hemodialysis and fomepizole) and recovered. The diagnosis of EG poisoning should not be ruled out due to a finding of non-elevated osmol gap (Darchy et al, 1999).
    h) CASE REPORT: Severe metabolic acidosis occurred in a 28-year-old woman and her newborn infant following maternal ingestion of ethylene glycol (400 mL) prior to delivery. The woman, 26 weeks pregnant, presented with speech difficulties, seizures, and hyperventilation, subsequently becoming comatose. She was also hypertensive. Suspecting eclampsia and possible fetal asphyxia, a cesarean section was performed. A serum tox screen revealed ethylene glycol levels of 2480 mg/L and 2206 mg/L for mother and child, respectively. Blood gas analysis of the mother revealed a pH of 6.53 and an umbilical cord examination of the infant showed a pH of 6.63. Both patients gradually recovered with supportive care (Kralova et al, 2006).
    i) CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with severe vomiting after a 5-day history of ingesting only vodka and energy drinks. Initial blood gas analysis revealed severe metabolic acidosis (pH 7.02, base excess of -24.4 mmol/L, lactate 22 to 25.9 mmol/L). Suspecting ethylene glycol poisoning due to the high lactate concentration, toxicological analysis of the patient's blood was performed, revealing a serum ethylene glycol concentration of 280 mg/L. Following a 12-hour ethanol infusion, the patient completely recovered (Marwick et al, 2012).
    j) NORMAL ANION GAP
    1) A normal anion gap does not preclude a diagnosis of ethylene glycol toxicity.
    2) CASE REPORT: In one case of suspected ethylene glycol toxicity the anion gap was falsely normal due to artificial elevation of serum chloride determinations from co-ingested bromide (Heckering, 1987).
    3) CASE REPORT: One report describes a case of ethylene glycol poisoning with concomitant overdose of lithium carbonate. The patient presented with an elevated osmolar gap and an EG level of 500 mg/dL, with only a mild metabolic acidosis and a near normal anion gap. The authors speculate that the large amount of carbonate ingested provided an additional store of buffer to combine with glycolic acid as it was formed (Leon & Graeber, 1994a).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PANCYTOPENIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Pancytopenia was reported in a 36-year-old man who ingested an unknown amount of ethylene glycol and was not treated until 12 hours post-ingestion (Bobbitt et al, 1986).
    b) CASE REPORT: Medullary examination in a 45-year-old woman who ingested ethylene glycol revealed hematopoiesis arrest. Anemia (Hb=7 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia (38,000/mm(3)) were reported on the 5th day after ingestion. Complete recovery occurred without sequelae following intensive therapy (Piagnerelli et al, 1999; Piagnerelli et al, 1999a).
    B) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Moderate leukocytosis (10,000 to 40,000 cells/mm(3)), with predominantly neutrophils, may be present (Verrilli et al, 1987).
    C) LYMPHOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chronic exposure to the vapors are reported to cause lymphocytosis (Dreisbach & Robertson, 1987).
    D) DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old chronic alcoholic died within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department with multiorgan failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation after an accidental ingestion of 200 to 300 g ethylene glycol (Jobard et al, 1996).
    E) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Methemoglobinemia has rarely been reported in conjunction with ethylene glycol ingestion (Rasic et al, 1999), however, antifreeze does not contain a methemoglobinemia-inducing agent. In one case, methemoglobinemia of 23% was treated with methylene blue (Siddiqi et al, 1998), and in another case methemoglobinemia of 7.1% (Hantson et al, 1998) was reported. The cause of methemoglobinemia in these cases was not established.
    F) LEUKEMOID REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old man was found unconscious and was brought to the emergency room with symptoms of EG toxicity. A complete blood count revealed 55,000/mm(3) white blood cells (WBC) (49% segmented neutrophils, 39% bands) and leukocyte alkaline phosphatase (LAP) was 174 (normal 20-100). Both the elevated WBC and LAP were consistent with a leukemoid reaction. With supportive care, the patient recovered within 24 hours of admission, and confessed to an intentional ingestion of EG 5 days prior to presentation. The patient's WBC normalized in 3 days (Mycyk et al, 2002).
    3.13.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ANEMIA HEMOLYTIC
    a) Dose-related intravascular hemolytic anemia was observed in rabbits exposed orally to ethylene glycol phenyl ether. Dermal exposures did not produce a hemolytic response (Breslin et al, 1991).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN IRRITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Ethylene glycol does not significantly irritate the skin (Rowe & Wolf, 1982; Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    b) Slight maceration of the skin may result from very severe, prolonged exposures (Rowe & Wolf, 1982; Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    B) CYANOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cyanosis may occur 12 hours or longer after ingestion (Friedman et al, 1962; Berman et al, 1957; Parry & Wallach, 1974).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC MYOPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Myalgia, muscle tenderness, and elevated CPK levels have been described (Friedman et al, 1962; Parry & Wallach, 1974; Scully et al, 1979; Verrilli et al, 1987).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Exposures to glycols have resulted in teratogenicity, specifically craniofacial and neural tube closure defects and skeletal dysplasia in animal studies.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) SKELETAL MALFORMATION
    1) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) Ethylene glycol in animals is teratogenic and causes other reproductive effects. Human mutation data have been reported (Lewis, 1996).
    b) Craniofacial and neural tube closure defects and skeletal dysplasia were reported in rats and mice at doses (1250 mg/kg/day and 750 mg/kg/day, respectively) administered during organogenesis. Depressed maternal weight gain during pregnancy was present and was considered by the investigators as possibly due to fetal effects (e.g., lower body weight) rather than a manifestation of maternal toxicity (Price et al, 1985).
    c) Marr et al (1992) found in rat studies that the incidence of skeletal alterations observed prenatally and through postnatal day 21 were not apparent by postnatal day 63. This suggests that perinatal skeletal alterations may not always be permanent.
    d) Continuous administration of ethylene glycol in drinking water to pregnant mice resulted in facial anomalies in the 1 percent dose group (Lamb et al, 1985).
    e) Administration of 11.1 g/kg of ethylene glycol to pregnant mice resulted in 10 percent maternal fatality and 60 percent neonatal fatality (Schuler et al, 1984).
    f) In an attempt to determine the contribution of ingested EG to teratogenicity in whole-body exposures, fetal CD-1 mice were exposed to EG by nose-only inhalation at concentrations as high as 2,500 mg/m(3) on days 6 to 15 of gestation, and also to whole-body exposure at 2,100 mg/m(3). The nose-only exposed animals had increased incidences of fused ribs and skeletal variations but no malformations, whereas the whole-body exposed animals showed both skeletal variations and malformations. This result confirms that malformations were due mainly to ingested EG (Tyl et al, 1995b).
    1) In support of this conclusion, mice exposed dermally to EG by occluded patches, which precluded ingestion, did not have maternal toxicity, increased pre- or post-implantation losses, or malformations (Tyl et al, 1995c).
    g) Skeletal and body weight variations seen in EG-exposed fetuses were reversible by postnatal day 63 (Marr et al, 1992).
    h) Developmental studies in the rabbit via gavage were negative (Tyl et al, 1993).
    B) MULTIPLE MALFORMATIONS
    1) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) When EG was given at lower doses of 0.04 to 1 g/kg/day to pregnant rats, no teratogenic effects were found (Maronpot, 1983), and neither male nor female fertility were affected over three generations (Depass, 1986b).
    b) Multiple malformations including hydrocephaly, gastroschisis, umbilical hernia, skeletal defects, poor ossification and reduced body weights were seen in rat fetuses exposed to 2,500 mg/kg/day from days 6 to 15 of gestation. In mice exposed to 1,500 mg/kg/day, skeletal and ossification defects and reduced body weights were seen. The NOELs for developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol were 150 mg/kg/day in mice and 500 mg/kg/day in rats (Neeper-Bradley et al, 1995).
    c) These results indicate that mice are more sensitive than rats to the developmental effects of EG, but rats show a broader spectrum of developmental defects (Neeper-Bradley et al, 1995).
    d) Rats and mice exposed by whole-body inhalation to EG at levels up to 2,500 mg/m(3) on days 6 through 15 of gestation for 6 hours/day had increased incidence of external, visceral and skeletal malformations (Tyl et al, 1995a).
    C) TOXIC METABOLITES
    1) ANIMAL STUDIES
    a) Ethylene glycol is used to cryopreserve embryos of many mammalian species, including pigs, goats, cows and horses (Otoi et al, 1995; Fieni et al, 1995; Hochi et al, 1994). This makes it unlikely that ethylene glycol itself is the active teratogen in whole-animal studies. The EG metabolite glycolic acid was active in contrast to EG itself for inducing developmental defects in whole-rat embryos in culture (Carney et al, 1996).
    b) To distinguish between the contributions of the toxic EG metabolite glycolic acid (GA) and metabolic acidosis in producing developmental toxicity in rats, either EG, GA or the sodium salt of GA were administered to pregnant animals on gestation days 6 to 15. The sodium salt was previously shown not to produce metabolic acidosis. All agents produced decreased body weights and structural malformations, but EG and GA produced more severe effects. These results indicate that metabolic acidosis interacts with EG toxicity to enhance reproductive effects at high doses (Carney et al, 1999).
    c) Rat cultivated embryo experiments suggest that glyoxalate may be the proximate teratogen in this species (Liberacki et al, 1996).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Malformed fetuses were produced at all doses ranging from 1,250 to 5,000 mg/kg/day in rats when given orally (Price et al, 1985). When EG was given at doses up to 1 percent in the drinking water of mice for two generations, it produced a slight but significant reduction in fertility, as measured by smaller numbers of litters and smaller number of offspring in each litter in the 2nd generation (Lamb et al, 1985; Shepard, 1995). Facial abnormalities and skeletal defects were found i n the offspring of the 1-percent group (Lamb et al, 1985).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS107-21-1 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) No data regarding carcinogenic effects in humans was found at the time of this review.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) No data regarding carcinogenic effects in humans was found at the time of this review (IARC, 1987; NTP, 1994).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Animal studies have not demonstrated any carcinogenic properties (Rowe & Wolf, 1982; Depass, 1986).

Genotoxicity

    A) EG was not mutagenic in the Salmonella/microsome assay (Ames test), in Chinese hamster V79 cells, in the yeast S. pombe, or in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y mutational assay. EG was mutagenic in mouse lymphocytes and was positive on cytogenic analysis in the rat. EG caused DNA inhibition in human lymphocytes.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Obtain metabolic panel (serum electrolytes, including calcium), BUN and creatinine on all patients with a history of ingestion.
    B) Obtain blood ethanol and ethylene glycol concentration, if available. Can consider a measured serum osmolality level if ethylene glycol concentration is not available.
    C) Patients with significant toxicity should have arterial blood gas.
    D) Obtain urinalysis with microscopy for calcium oxalate crystals. Hematuria and proteinuria are also common. Monitor urine output.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) ELECTROLYTES/ACID BASE STATUS: Monitor serum electrolytes, including BUN, creatinine and calcium levels. Arterial blood gas for patients who are acidotic or symptomatic.
    2) ANION GAP: Ethylene glycol intoxication usually results in metabolic acidosis with an elevated anion gap. A normal anion gap does not preclude a diagnosis of ethylene glycol toxicity.
    a) Normal anion gap is 12 to 16 using the formula AG = (Na + K) - (Cl + HCO3), but may vary from laboratory to laboratory.
    b) Using the formula: Anion Gap = (Na - (Cl + HCO(3))): Normal values have been reported as 12 +/- 4 mEq/L, but vary depending on the laboratory used. The range for a normal anion gap reported in some laboratories is 7 +/- 4 mEq/L (Hoffman et al, 1993).
    3) RENAL FUNCTION: Monitor renal function closely. Renal insufficiency may develop 2 to 3 days postingestion.
    B) ETHYLENE GLYCOL CONCENTRATION
    1) Obtain ethanol, ethylene glycol, and, in select cases, methanol concentrations. Some laboratories cannot measure ethylene glycol, therefore patients should be evaluated by clinical findings to include arterial blood gases for acidosis and urinalysis for crystalluria.
    a) Patients ingesting large quantities of ethanol subsequent to ethylene glycol ingestion may develop clinical manifestations of ethylene glycol poisoning (high anion-gap metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, renal insufficiency). Thus, ethylene glycol toxicity should NOT be excluded based on a therapeutic ethanol level or a non-toxic but detectable EG level (Hoffman et al, 2001).
    C) OSMOLAL GAP MEASUREMENT
    1) SUMMARY: If the determination of a serum ethylene glycol concentration will be delayed, or if a serum ethylene glycol concentration cannot be obtained, determine the plasma osmolarity using the freezing point depression method. (Remember: A normal osmolar gap (difference between measured and calculated osmolality) does NOT rule out ethylene glycol poisoning). An increased osmolal gap suggests the possibility of toxic alcohol ingestion.
    a) NORMAL OSMOLAL GAP: There are wide variations in "normal" osmolal gaps depending on the formula used. An individual's osmolal gap may fall within the "normal" range and still be distinctly elevated for that individual. Thus a "normal" osmolal gap cannot be reliably used to exclude the possibility of ethylene glycol ingestion (Hoffman et al, 1993; Glaser, 1996; Kruse & Cadnapaphornchai, 1994; Aabakken et al, 1994). An increased osmolal gap would be suggestive of intoxication with an osmotically active substance such as ethylene glycol (Glaser, 1996).
    b) CASE REPORT: Steinhart (1990) reports a 23-year-old man with a normal osmolal gap (measured by freezing point depression) and an ethylene glycol concentration of 21.7 mg%(Steinhart, 1990).
    c) CASE REPORT: Two patients, with delayed hospital admission, presented with metabolic acidosis, arterial pH of 7.10 and 6.96, respectively, and without an elevated serum osmolal gap. Subsequent laboratory tests revealed significant levels of ethylene glycol. Both patients were treated (hemodialysis and fomepizole) and recovered. The diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning should not be ruled out due to a finding of non-elevated osmolal gap (Darchy et al, 1999).
    2) INCREASED OSMOLAL GAP: The presence of an increased osmolal gap suggests the possibility of a toxic alcohol (including ethylene glycol) ingestion. In 22 cases of ethylene glycol ingestions, the measured serum osmolarity and osmolar gap were the only laboratory assays which correlated most accurately with ethylene glycol concentrations (Leikin et al, 1997).
    3) DETERMINATION OF OSMOLAL GAP: Measure the serum osmolality (using the freezing point depression method).
    a) Determine the calculated serum osmolality (Osm-Cal):
                 TRADITIONAL UNITS
    Osm-Cal = 1.86 Na + Glucose + BUN
                        -------   ---
                           18     2.8
              -----------------------
                         0.93
    where:
       1.86 = osmotic coefficient of Na
         Na = mEq/L MEASURED sodium
    Glucose = mg/dL MEASURED glucose
        BUN = mg/dL MEASURED blood urea nitrogen
         18 = molecular wt glucose/deciliter conversion
        2.8 = molecular wt BUN/deciliter conversion
       0.93 = correct for serum water
                        SI UNITS
    Osm-Cal = 1.86 Na + Glucose + BUN
              -----------------------
                        0.93
    where:
       1.86 = osmotic coefficient of Na
         Na = mmol/L MEASURED sodium
    Glucose = mmol/L MEASURED glucose
        BUN = mmol/L MEASURED blood urea nitrogen
       0.93 = correct for serum water
    

    b) Correct for co-ingested ethanol by dividing the measured blood ethanol concentration (in mg/dL) by 4.6 and adding the result to the calculated osmolality before determining the osmolal gap.
    c) Subtract the calculated serum osmolality from the measured serum osmolality to determine the osmolal gap. This difference can be accounted for by the presence of osmotically active substances (including ethylene glycol).
    d) The osmolal gap may be used to estimate the serum ethylene glycol level (in mg/dL) by simply multiplying the gap by 6.2 (the molecular weight of ethylene glycol/10). This method assumes that the patient's serum contains only ethylene glycol (and no other osmotically active substances such as ethanol).
    1) The calculated ethylene glycol level, based on osmolal gap, was related to the measured ethylene glycol level (r=0.4) in a study of 54 patients (Jaeger et al, 1993): EG measured (in g/L) = 0.3 x EG calculated (in g/L) + 0.06.
    e) HYPERTONIC HYPONATREMIA: In patients with hyperglycemia, free water moves into the extracellular space, and measured serum sodium concentrations are lower. This must be corrected for in the calculation of the serum osmolality, or the osmolal gap will be falsely elevated. The serum sodium concentration must be corrected by about 1.6 mEq/L for every increase of 100 mg/dL in serum glucose above 100 mg/dL(Sztajnkrycer & Scaglione, 2005).
    f) OTHER LIMITATIONS: Isopropyl alcohol, methanol, ethanol, and acetone can cause an osmolal gap (Cadnapaphornchai et al, 1981). The sensitivity and accuracy of this method of estimating blood ethylene glycol concentrations diminishes when levels fall below 50 to 100 mg/dL.
    1) Late in the course of poisoning, an osmolal gap may not be apparent due to the low concentration of remaining ethylene glycol and accumulated acidic metabolites that affect the magnitude of the osmolal gap and anion gap (Eder et al, 1998). The osmolal gap is not an accurate predictor of actual EG levels. A normal osmolal gap does not exclude a significant elevated EG level (Erdman et al, 2001).
    D) GLYCOLIC ACID/GLYOXYLIC ACID/OXALIC ACID
    1) Glycolic acid, the major metabolite of ethylene glycol, can be detected and measured by HPLC (Hewlett et al, 1986). This may assist in assessing acid-base status in severely poisoned patients but is not routinely recommended or available.
    2) Analysis for glycolic acid is an acceptable confirmation procedure for ethylene glycol poisoning. Misidentification of ethylene glycol based upon reliance on gas chromatographic retention time has been reported and confirming the presence of glycolic acid may be helpful. (Fraser & MacNeil, 1993; Fraser et al, 2002) Confirmation of death due to ethylene glycol ingestion by measurement of blood and urine glycolic acid levels, using gas chromatography, has been documented in a postmortem case (4 days after death) (Eisenga et al, 2001).
    E) GLYCINE
    1) Elevated blood glycine levels were present in one case of deliberate ethylene glycol poisoning in an 8-month-old child, presumably due to metabolism of glycolic acid (Woolf et al, 1992).
    F) LABORATORY INTERFERENCE BLOOD LACTATE
    1) Blood gas analyzers are capable of analyzing blood lactate levels along with standard blood gas measurements. The Nova Stat Profile and Ciba Corning Diagnostics 860 were evaluated for possible assay interference by several toxic substances, including ethylene glycol. No significant interference with lactate levels was reported in samples containing ethylene glycol (Lacoma et al, 1997).
    2) The Bayer (formerly Chiron) 860, Rapidlab-865, and Rapidlab-1265 blood gas analyzers have produced falsely elevated lactate levels in patients with ethylene glycol poisoning, probably due to interference of glycolate, a toxic metabolite of ethylene glycol. Glycolate is very similar in structure to lactate and may interfere in the measurement of whole blood lactate by some chemistry analyzers, resulting in falsely elevated lactate levels leading to potentially misdiagnosing an ethylene glycol overdose as lactic acidosis (Oostvogels et al, 2013; Fijen et al, 2006; Woo et al, 2003).
    3) BECKMAN Synchron lactate method has been shown to result in error flag messages of "rate high" when glycolic acid was present in serum. This may be a clue to possible ethylene glycol ingestion as the cause of an otherwise unknown high anion gap metabolic acidosis (Porter et al, 2000).
    G) METHEMOGLOBIN
    1) Patients who are cyanotic or present with symptoms of methemoglobinemia should have blood methemoglobin concentrations measured.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) Microscopic analysis of the urine for calcium oxalate crystals may aid in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning. The absence of calcium oxalate crystals in the urine does not rule out the diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning.
    2) Calcium oxalate crystals are typically of two varieties: monohydrate and dihydrate. Monohydrate crystals are needle-shaped and resemble sodium urate crystals. Dihydrate crystals are envelope-shaped and are more specific for ethylene glycol (Huhn & Rosenberg, 1995).
    3) In one reported case of massive ethylene glycol ingestion, envelope-shaped crystals were first present at 16 hours postingestion, became mixed with needle-shaped crystals at 17 to 18 hours postingestion, and only needle-shaped crystals were present thereafter (Jacobsen et al, 1987).
    4) Goodkin (1990) describes a method of detecting calcium oxalate crystals in an anuric patient who may have ingested toxins. Irrigate the urinary bladder with 50 to 100 mL of saline, centrifuge the irrigant, and examine the sediment for calcium oxalate crystals (Goodkin, 1990).
    5) URINE FLUORESCENCE: The presence or absence of fluorescence should not be used to guide decision making in cases of suspected ethylene glycol poisoning. Absence of urine fluorescence should not be used to exclude a diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning, and no patient should be treated strictly on the basis of a positive fluorescent urine (Wallace et al, 2001) Fluorescent urine should NOT be used as an indicator of ethylene glycol antifreeze ingestion due to variations in interpretation of urine fluorescence among observers and the presence of urine fluorescence of patients with no ethylene glycol poisoning (Casavant et al, 2001).
    a) Wallace et al (1999) found Wood's lamp determination of urine fluorescence NOT to be accurate for detection of sodium fluorescein ingestion in an amount consistent with a toxic ingestion of antifreeze in a blinded study utilizing 28 healthy men ingesting 0.6 mg sodium fluorescein (Wallace et al, 1999).
    b) A study conducted by Parsa et al involving the detection of urine fluorescence in children using a Wood lamp also found that the Wood lamp is a poor diagnostic tool in suspected ethylene glycol ingestions in children (Parsa et al, 2005).

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) A rapid (10 minute) analysis of biological fluids using isocratic HPLC, a refractive index detector, and a Waters fast fruit juice analytical column is described for the determination of ethylene glycol and glycolic acid. The authors state a detection limit of approximately 50 ppm with real samples which could be improved by utilizing a column with more theoretical plates (Smith & Lang, 2000).
    2) A gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for the detection and quantification of ethylene glycol in human plasma for early diagnosis of poisoning is described. 1,3-Propanediol is used as an internal standard. Limit of detection and limit of quantification are 0.01 g/L and 0.1 g/L, respectively. This method is also suitable for urine analysis of ethylene glycol (Maurer et al, 2001).
    3) False positive ethylene glycol values may occur with colorimetric or gas chromatography using an OV-17 column in the presence of propylene glycol. In addition, central venous catheters can become contaminated with propylene glycol from administered medications (intravenous diazepam, lorazepam, phenytoin), giving false positive ethylene glycol levels if the same catheter is used to obtain blood for ethylene glycol concentrations. In patients receiving propylene glycol containing medications, a non-interfering method (i.e., gas chromatography with OV-1 column or mass spectrometry) should be used (Hilliard et al, 2004; Porter & Jarrells, 1994; Robinson et al, 1983). False positive ethylene glycol concentrations due to propylene glycol have also been reported in laboratories using enzymatic methods (Jones & Hard, 2004).
    a) In place of propylene glycol as an internal standard in gas chromatography, it is now recommended that either 1,3-propanediol or 1,2-butanediol be used to avoid interference of propylene glycol from external sources such as IV pharmaceutical preparations (Eder et al, 1998).
    4) Gas chromatography methods based on elution time only may also result in false positive ethylene glycol levels in patients with endogenous interfering compounds, such as propionic acid in children with inborn errors of metabolism (Shoemaker et al, 1992).
    5) False positive results for ethylene glycol may result in the presence of ketoacidosis when serum is analyzed by GLC after derivatization. In the serum from some ketoacidotic diabetic patients the oxidation-reduction derivatization procedure results in unpredictable amounts of methanol-like products (Bjellerup et al, 1994).
    6) TRACE ANALYSIS: A rapid gas chromatographic detection and determination of ethylene glycol in biological fluids which requires only 100 microliters of serum or urine is reported by Balikova & Kohlicek (1988) (Balikova & Kohlicek, 1988).
    7) CAPILLARY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY: Determination of ethylene glycol in postmortem blood by capillary gas chromatography is described (Jonsson et al, 1989). The limit of detection by this technique is 0.05 g/L.
    8) DIRECT INJECTION: A simple and reliable method for determination of ethylene glycol utilizing direct injection of diluted serum on a wide-bore capillary column containing a highly polar stationary phase is described (Edinboro et al, 1993).
    9) A gas chromatograph with a mass selective detector was used to quantitatively determine plasma concentrations of ethylene glycol and its metabolite (glycolic acid) following inhalational exposure of vaporous radiolabeled ethylene glycol (Carstens et al, 2003).
    B) SPECTROSCOPY/SPECTROMETRY
    1) Wahl et al (1998) describe an H NMR spectroscopy (H proton nuclear magnetic resonance) method for determination and quantification of ethylene glycol(Wahl et al, 1998). Advantages of this method include: rapid diagnosis (recording of spectra takes 10-20 minutes), detection of metabolites, accurate identification, and both qualitative and reliable quantification of various compounds.
    C) OTHER
    1) Inadequate sensitivity, lack of specificity, and high blank values may be encountered with various methods utilized in the determination of ethylene glycol concentrations (Doeden, 1983). An accurate method of serum concentration determination is described by Peterson & Rodgerson (1974) (Peterson & Rodgerson, 1974).
    2) Units of blood concentrations of ethylene glycol may be reported as mg/dL or mg/L (Aronow et al, 1989).
    3) The presence of methanol may interfere with the detection of ethylene glycol in serum when fluorometrically measured (Aronow et al, 1989).
    4) RAPID SCREENING TEST: Jarvie & Simpson (1990) developed a rapid and simple screening test for ethylene glycol and methanol without interference from ethanol based on the Toxi-Lab alcohol screening test (Jarvie & Simpson, 1990). The authors recommend that samples giving positive results should be analyzed by another confirmatory technique to determine the identity (ethylene glycol or methanol) and concentration of the poison.
    5) ENZYMATIC SCREENING ASSAY: Hansson & Masson (1989) found that the DuPont ACA Triglyceride kit when used to assay ethylene glycol correlated well with the results obtained using gas chromatography with pre-column derivatization (r=0.975) (Hansson & Masson, 1989). Endogenous glycolaldehyde and glycerol interfere with this enzyme assay, but ethanol does not.
    6) GLYCOLIC ACID: Fraser and MacNeil (1993) described a gas chromatographic and colorimetric procedure which can be performed quickly and has no false positives from many different solvents or organic acids tested (Fraser & MacNeil, 1993a). Fraser (1998) emphasizes the importance of glycolic acid (GA) concentrations due to the rapid metabolism of ethylene glycol to GA . The author reports 2 cases of negative ethylene glycol measurements and GA concentrations greater than 10 mmol/L on admission to emergency department.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any patient showing definitive signs of ethylene glycol poisoning (worsening renal function, metabolic acidosis, etc.) should be admitted to the hospital. Patients who have co-ingested ethanol will likely require admission if serum ethylene glycol concentrations cannot be measured, as these patients may not develop toxicity for more than 12 hours after presentation. Any patient receiving ethanol therapy requires an ICU admission. Any patient that is otherwise well and receiving fomepizole therapy should be safe in a less monitored setting (may require monitoring for suicide risk) (Caravati et al, 2005).
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) An AAPCC consensus guideline recommends that children with an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or a known inadvertent ingestion of less than 10 mL in an adult can be monitored at home. All other exposures, including unwitnessed exposures or intentional misuse (eg; suicide, malicious use), should be referred to a healthcare facility. If it has been more than 24 hours since a potentially toxic exposure, and the patient is asymptomatic with no alcohol coingestion, no referral is required (Caravati et al, 2005). Inhalation, dermal and ocular exposures generally do not develop systemic toxicity and can be monitored at home unless significant irritation develops.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult your local poison center for any ethylene glycol exposure, especially those requiring antidote treatment, hemodialysis, or if the history is unclear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) An AAPCC consensus guideline recommends that children with more than an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or an adult with known inadvertent ingestion of "swallow" (10 to 30 mL) or more should be referred immediately to a healthcare facility. Refer any patients with symptoms of ethylene glycol poisoning (eg, vomiting, slurred speech, ataxia, altered mental status) to a healthcare facility (Caravati et al, 2005). Patients who have no acidosis, normal renal function and a nontoxic ethylene glycol concentration may be discharged. If it is not possible to measure ethylene glycol concentrations, it is reasonable to observe patients who have undetectable serum ethanol concentrations for a minimum of 8 hours. During this period, the serum pH, bicarbonate and creatinine should be monitored every 2 hours. If the patient has no symptoms, no metabolic acidosis and normal renal function after 8 to 12 hours of observation, the risk of significant ethylene glycol toxicity is very low.

Monitoring

    A) Obtain metabolic panel (serum electrolytes, including calcium), BUN and creatinine on all patients with a history of ingestion.
    B) Obtain blood ethanol and ethylene glycol concentration, if available. Can consider a measured serum osmolality level if ethylene glycol concentration is not available.
    C) Patients with significant toxicity should have arterial blood gas.
    D) Obtain urinalysis with microscopy for calcium oxalate crystals. Hematuria and proteinuria are also common. Monitor urine output.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Activated charcoal is not routinely recommended for isolated ethylene glycol ingestions. The utility of activated charcoal is limited due to ethylene glycol's rapid absorption from the GI tract and its poor binding affinity for activated charcoal. Unless there is concern for coingestants, there is little benefit from activated charcoal administration in ethylene glycol ingestions. The decision to administer activated charcoal is left to the individual clinician.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Activated charcoal is not routinely recommended for isolated ethylene glycol ingestions. The utility of activated charcoal is limited due to ethylene glycol's rapid absorption from the GI tract and its poor binding affinity for activated charcoal. Unless there is concern for coingestants, there is little benefit from activated charcoal administration in ethylene glycol ingestions. The decision to administer activated charcoal is left to the individual clinician.
    B) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Since ethylene glycol is a liquid, gastric lavage and whole bowel irrigation have no place in management. One could consider simple nasogastric tube aspiration for recent large ingestions, if the airway is protected.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) Non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema is extremely rare even following large ingestions of ethylene glycol with high serum concentrations. Inhalation of high concentrations of ethylene glycol may cause respiratory tract irritation.
    2) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    3) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    4) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    5) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    6) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    7) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    8) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    C) ACIDOSIS
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes. ABGs are useful when patients are symptomatic or are acidotic. Severe normochloremic anion gap metabolic acidosis is common (Wacker, 1965; Friedman et al, 1962; Parry & Wallach, 1974). Severe acidosis with low bicarbonate concentrations and severe acidemia with low serum pH are not uncommon following severe intoxication (Friedman et al, 1962).
    2) Intravenous sodium bicarbonate should NOT routinely be administered. Sodium bicarbonate should not be administered prophylactically or for the treatment of mild to moderate acidosis or acidemia. The treatment of acidosis and acidemia should be directed at preventing further metabolism of ethylene glycol by administering antidotal therapy and, when indicated, by removing both ethylene glycol and its toxic metabolites with hemodialysis. Sodium bicarbonate administration may be useful as a temporizing measure in managing cases of severe and life-threatening acidosis and acidemia prior to hemodialysis. (ADULT: 1 to 2 mEq/kg; CHILDREN: 1 mEq/kg) Repeat dosing of sodium bicarbonate should be guided by the response to therapy as indicated by electrolyte and ABG monitoring.
    D) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor electrolytes, calcium, renal function, ethylene glycol concentration, blood ethanol levels. Can consider a measured serum osmolality level if ethylene glycol concentration not available. Arterial blood gas for patients with significant toxicity. Obtain a urinalysis (check for calcium oxalate crystals; hematuria and proteinuria are also common) and monitor urine output.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) INDICATIONS FOR ANTIDOTE THERAPY
    a) The following criteria have been proposed by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology as indications for treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning with an antidote (either ethanol or fomepizole) (Barceloux et al, 1999):
    1) Documented plasma ethylene glycol concentration greater than 20 mg/dL
    1) Documented recent (hours) history of ingesting toxic amounts of ethylene glycol with an osmolar gap greater than 10 mOsm/L
    1) History or strong clinical suspicion of ethylene glycol poisoning and at least 2 of the following criteria:
    a) Arterial pH less than 7.3
    b) Serum bicarbonate less than 20 mEq/L
    c) Urinary oxalate crystals present
    1) OR
    2) OR
    2) Antidotal therapy should also be considered in any patient with a history or in whom there is a strong clinical suspicion of large ethylene glycol ingestion.
    3) The decision as to which antidote to use depends on a number of factors. Fomepizole is easier to use clinically, requires less monitoring, does not cause CNS depression or hypoglycemia, and may eliminate the need for dialysis in some patients. Ethanol requires continuous administration and frequent monitoring of serum ethanol and glucose levels, and may cause CNS depression and hypoglycemia (especially in children). The drug cost associated with ethanol use is generally much lower than with fomepizole; however other costs associated with ethanol use (continuous intravenous infusion, hourly blood draws and ethanol levels, ICU monitoring, possibly greater use of hemodialysis) may make the costs more comparable.
    4) ETHANOL COMPLICATIONS: Approximately 5% of patients (n=133) in a retrospective case series were reported to have adverse events associated with ethanol therapy, including CNS depression and apnea. Approximately 50% of all ethylene glycol exposures that presented for treatment with normal renal function experienced renal toxicity even with ethanol therapy (Watson et al, 2001).
    a) Ethanol therapy was associated with significant CNS and respiratory depression and hypotension, necessitating intubation and vasopressor support in a 50-year-old man following ingestion of 2 L of antifreeze. After metabolic acidosis with respiratory compensation was reported on ABG, the patient was given an ethanol loading dose of 70 grams of a 10% solution over 1 hour, after which he experienced a complicated course (Baumann et al, 1998). In this case, fomepizole may have been a better choice of therapy, due to the volume of ethylene glycol ingested .
    b) Kowalczyk et al (1998) report a patient who experienced respiratory arrest following a bolus infusion of ethanol for EG toxicity.
    5) TREATMENT DELAY/OUTCOME: According to a retrospective observational analysis of confirmed ethylene glycol poisoning cases (n=121) obtained from the California Poison Control System over a period of 10 years (1999 to 2008), patients who received antidotal therapy (either fomepizole or ethanol) greater than 6 hours after presentation had a greater risk of developing prolonged renal insufficiency or dying compared to patients who received antidotal treatment within 3 hours after presentation (odds ratio (OR) 3.34 (95% CI 1.21 to 9.26) (Lung et al, 2015).
    F) FOMEPIZOLE
    1) SUMMARY - Fomepizole (Antizole(R); 4-Methylpyrazole; 4-MP), a specific antagonist of alcohol dehydrogenase, has been demonstrated to be highly effective in the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning (Battistella, 2002; Druteika et al, 2002; Sivilotti et al, 2000; Borron et al, 1999; Brent et al, 1999). Fomepizole has not been approved for use in children.
    2) INDICATIONS FOR USING FOMEPIZOLE - The following guidelines were developed by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (Barceloux et al, 1999):
    1) Ingestion of multiple substances resulting in depressed level of consciousness
    2) Altered consciousness
    3) Lack of adequate intensive care staffing or laboratory support to monitor ethanol administration
    4) Relative contraindications to ethanol
    5) Critically-ill patient with anion gap-metabolic acidosis of unknown origin and potential exposure to ethylene glycol
    6) Patients with active hepatic disease
    3) DOSE
    a) An initial loading dose of 15 mg/kg is intravenously infused over 30 minutes followed by doses of 10 mg/kg/every 12 hours for 4 doses, then 15 mg/kg every 12 hours until ethylene glycol concentrations are below 20 mg/dL (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    b) HEMODIALYSIS - The frequency of dosing should be increased during dialysis. If dialysis is begun 6 hours or more since the last fomepizole dose the next scheduled dose should be administered. Dosing during dialysis should be increased to every 4 hours (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    1) If the last fomepizole dose was administered one to three hours before completion of dialysis, half of the next scheduled dose should be administered at the completion of dialysis. If the last fomepizole dose was administered more than 3 hours before completion of hemodialysis, the next scheduled dose should be administered when dialysis is completed.
    c) Jobard et al (1996) have recommended that a loading dose of 10 to 20 mg/kg before dialysis and an infusion of fomepizole of 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/hr during hemodialysis is sufficient to maintain therapeutic fomepizole concentrations(Jobard et al, 1996a). In one patient this regimen during dialysis maintained plasma fomepizole concentrations above 14 mg/L.
    d) Faessel et al (1995) found a rate of infusion for fomepizole to maintain therapeutic level at steady-state to be at least 3 to 4 times higher than the rate used without hemodialysis(Faessel et al, 1995a).
    e) In patients with large ethylene glycol ingestions, several days of fomepizole administration may be required before ethylene glycol levels are below the limits of detection. Thus, even in patients who present early and do not develop metabolic acidosis or renal insufficiency, it may be more cost effective to perform a single hemodialysis session that allows a 24-hour hospitalization rather than administer fomepizole monotherapy for several days of hospitalization (Vasavada et al, 2003).
    f) HEPATIC FAILURE - Wax & McMartin (1999) reported the use of fomepizole in an adult who presented with fulminant liver failure due to chronic use of acetaminophen and ethanol. One dose of fomepizole (15 mg/kg, total 1050 mg) was given intravenously. Fomepizole is normally eliminated from the body by hepatic metabolism. In this case nonlinear elimination was reported with first order kinetics, and a half-life of 17.8 hours (half-life with healthy liver is about 2 hours) (Wax et al, 1999).
    4) AVAILABILITY
    a) Fomepizole (Antizole(R); 4-MP) is available in the United States for the treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    5) CASE REPORTS/SERIES
    a) Baud et al (1986-87) treated 3 patients recently intoxicated with ethylene glycol with 20 mg/kg/day of fomepizole(Baud et al, 1986-87). Renal function remained normal in all three; reversible metabolic acidosis occurred in two. Hemodialysis was not done. Eosinophilia and skin rash were side effects noted.
    b) Administration of fomepizole, beginning 9 hours and ending 61 hours postingestion, was successful in a 42-year-old man who ingested 1.5 liters of 93% ethylene glycol (EG level 320 mg/dL) (Baud et al, 1988). Hemodialysis was not done, and the patient received one dose of intravenous ethanol 4.5 hours postingestion. Normal 24-hour oxalate excretion occurred within 36 hours of the start of fomepizole therapy.
    c) Fomepizole completely blocked metabolism of ethylene glycol in a case of ingestion of 100 mL. The dosage was 1200 mg IV infused over 30 minutes, followed by 600, 400, 200 and 100 mg every 12 hours until plasma ethylene glycol was below 0.1 g/L. The patient recovered with no ill effects (Harry et al, 1994).
    d) Hantson et al (1998) report a 19-year-old woman admitted to the emergency department within an hour of ethylene glycol ingestion. Initial serum EG level was 1.34 g/L (21.6 mmol/L), anion gap 14.5, and osmolal gap 24. Therapy with fomepizole (9.5 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 7.0, 3.6, 1.2, 0.6, and 0.6 mg/kg at intervals of 12 hr) alone was effective in preventing EG metabolism. No ethanol therapy, hemodialysis, or sodium bicarbonate was required. An EG half-life of 11 hr was reported during fomepizole therapy .
    e) CASE REPORT - A 33-year-old man presented to the emergency department approximately 1 hour after ingesting one-half gallon of ethylene glycol antifreeze and ethanol. The patient's vital signs were normal, his physical examination was unremarkable, and there was no evidence of metabolic acidosis. His initial serum ethylene glycol level was 706 mg/dL and his serum ethanol level was 84 mg/dL. After 72 hours of treatment with fomepizole (a total of 8 doses), without hemodialysis, the patient's serum ethylene glycol level was 6 mg/dL. Serial laboratory data showed normal anion gap and normal renal function throughout therapy, suggesting that early intervention with fomepizole as monotherapy may be all that is needed for a good patient outcome, although further studies are recommended (Velez et al, 2002).
    f) Brent et al (1999) reported the successful use of early fomepizole in a series of 19 patients with ethylene glycol plasma levels >20 mg/dL(Brent et al, 1999a). Renal injury was prevented when fomepizole was started early in the course of poisoning, resulting in inhibition of toxic metabolite formation. Seventeen of the patients concurrently underwent hemodialysis. An average of 3.5 doses (range, 1 to 7) over an average of 17.8 hr (range, 5 to 58) were administered. All patients experienced progressive declines in plasma glycolate concentrations. Eighteen of the 19 patients survived. A patient with an arterial pH of 7.05 and a myocardial infarct prior to starting fomepizole died. Adverse fomepizole effects were minimal.
    g) Donovan et al (1998) found similar good outcomes in 2 ethylene glycol poisoned patients treated with fomepizole and hemodialysis and 2 ethylene glycol poisoned patients treated with fomepizole alone. However, the length of hospital stay was longer in the fomepizole-only treated patients.
    h) Fomepizole was given to two patients following ethylene glycol ingestions. One patient ingested approximately 500 mL of ethylene glycol, developed metabolic acidosis (pH 7.10, HCO3 5.4 mM, anion gap 32 mM), and was started on fomepizole therapy, 5 to 6 hours postingestion, that continued for 2 days. The patient's renal function status remained normal throughout the treatment period, and hemodialysis was not performed. The second patient presented with severe metabolic acidosis (pH 6.93, HCO3 3.6 mM, anion gap 33 mM) after ingesting an unknown amount of ethylene glycol, and was treated with fomepizole for three days. The patient's metabolic acidosis resolved, there was no evidence of renal failure, and hemodialysis was not performed. The authors speculate that fomepizole administration may help to prevent renal failure and the need for hemodialysis even in patients who present in the later stages of ethylene glycol poisoning (Moestue et al, 2002), however most authorities would recommend hemodialysis in addition to fomepizole in such patients.
    i) INFANT - An 8-month-old boy (7.7 kg) was admitted to the hospital after drinking up to 120 mL ethylene glycol 95%. At 3 hr postingestion ethylene glycol serum level of 384 mg/dL was reported. Fomepizole (15 mg/kg) was started at 4 hours postingestion. Fomepizole (10 mg/kg) was repeated at 10 hours postingestion, then every 12 hours for 2 more doses. At 33 hours postingestion an ethylene glycol level of 11 mg/dL was reported. A total of 4 hours of hemodialysis was also utilized, starting at 5 hours postingestion (Baum et al, 2000).
    j) PEDIATRIC - Fomepizole was effectively used to treat a potentially lethal ethylene glycol ingestion in a 4-year-old child. Treatment was started 7 hours after the ingestion. Plasma fomepizole levels remained in the range of values reported to block ethylene glycol metabolism. Rapid correction of acidosis occurred without alkalinization, and increased ethylene glycol half-life was reported. No adverse effects of fomepizole were reported (Harry et al, 1998).
    k) PEDIATRIC - 30 minutes after ingestion of 4 ounces of antifreeze, a 13-year-old girl was admitted to the ED. Measured serum ethylene glycol concentration was 103 mg/dL. An ethanol bolus of 600 mg/kg was given followed by continuous infusion of 20% ethanol at 30 mL/hr. Six hours postingestion she received a fomepizole loading dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously followed by 10 mg/kg every 12 hours (requiring a total of 5 fomepizole doses). Serum ethylene glycol concentration at 36 hours postingestion was 13 mg/dL (Boyer et al, 2001).
    6) MULTIPLE DOSE STUDY - A placebo-controlled, double-blind, multiple dose, sequential, ascending dose study among healthy volunteers showed fomepizole had less toxicity and slower elimination, suggesting that fomepizole is preferable to ethanol in treatment of methanol/ethylene glycol poisoning (Jacobsen et al, 1990).
    a) Oral loading doses of fomepizole were followed by supplemental doses every 12 hours through 5 days, producing plasma levels in the therapeutic range.
    7) KINETICS - In a crossover trial of intravenous and oral fomepizole in healthy male subjects, similar rates of elimination and saturable kinetics were noted after intravenous and oral fomepizole. Plasma concentrations of fomepizole were similar after intravenous and oral dosing within 15 minutes and up to 25 hours. Slight phlebosclerosis was noted after intravenous bolus dosing. Administration of fomepizole by intravenous drip eliminated this adverse effect (McMartin & Heath, 1989).
    a) In a placebo-controlled, single-dose, randomized, sequential, ascending-dose study, fomepizole elimination from plasma followed nonlinear kinetics with mean rates of decline of 3.66, 5.05, and 14.9 micromoles/liter/hour at 10, 20, and 100 mg/kg doses, respectively, in healthy male volunteers. Only 3% of the administered dose was excreted unchanged in the urine, with an average renal clearance of 0.016 mL/min/kg (Jacobsen et al, 1989).
    b) A prolonged ethylene glycol half-life is predicted when fomepizole pretreatment creatinine is >1.2 mg/dL and the creatinine clearance is depressed (Sivilotti et al, 2000a).
    c) Ethylene glycol elimination during fomepizole therapy can be predicted using serum creatinine concentration at presentation and creatinine clearance, which has correlated well with ethylene glycol elimination during fomepizole monotherapy. There is a postulated linear relationship between these 2 variables; this may help determine which patients will require hemodialysis to further ethylene glycol elimination. Absolute ethylene glycol concentration above 50 mg/dL should NOT be the sole criterion for starting hemodialysis in patients treated with fomepizole (Sivilotti et al, 2000).
    8) FOMEPIZOLE METABOLISM - Fomepizole is metabolized by the CYP 450 system (Jacobsen et al, 1988). Hepatic CYP 450 concentration and activities of ethanol-specific isozymes were increased in rats which received fomepizole for 3 days (Feierman & Cederbaum, 1985).
    a) Sivilotti et al (2000) have found a slow rate of ethylene glycol serum elimination during fomepizole monotherapy and a significant increase when fomepizole concentrations were <10 micromoles/L in a meta trial of 18 patients with ethylene glycol poisoning(Sivilotti et al, 2000a). This suggested a strong inhibition of hepatic metabolism by fomepizole.
    9) HEMODIALYZABILITY - Jacobsen et al (1992) reported that fomepizole was dialyzed at about the same rate as urea in the pig model. It may be necessary to increase the dose of fomepizole during dialysis. Although fomepizole is significantly removed by hemodialysis in humans (50 to 65 mL/min), about the same as the pig model above, this occurs to a lesser extent than the dialysance of ethanol and does not seem to affect the efficacy of fomepizole (Jacobsen et al, 1992). The removal of fomepizole needs to be taken into account when ethylene glycol poisoned patients are dialyzed. Faessel et al (1995) found a mean dialysance of fomepizole to be 137 and 117 mL/min, corresponding to fomepizole removal rate of 83 and 51 mg/hr in 2 patients, respectively(Faessel et al, 1995).
    10) ADVERSE EFFECTS - In a study of 22 patients who received doses of 600 to 8650 mg, the following adverse effects were noted (Baud et al, 1992):
    Pain on Injection2
    Abdominal Pain1
    Skin Rash1
    Nausea1
    Headache1

    a) A study in normal human volunteers showed that subjective side effects were not noted in the presumed therapeutic range of 10 to 20 mg/kg, while slight to moderate dizziness and nausea were noted with doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg (McMartin et al, 1987). No changes in blood or urine or objective clinical parameters were seen at any dosing level (McMartin et al, 1987).
    b) Other reported side effects have included unpleasant taste after ingestion, a mild, transient increase in serum transaminases and increased serum triglycerides. Increased serum triglycerides were also present in placebo-treated controls (Jacobsen et al, 1990).
    c) Headache has been reported in approximately 10% of subjects (Personal Communication, 1997).
    11) ETHANOL ELIMINATION - Wax et al (1998) examined the effect of fomepizole on ethanol elimination in ethylene glycol poisoned patients. Mean ethanol t1/2 and elimination rate following fomepizole dosing were 2.6 hr (+/-0.7) and 18.3 mg/dL/hr (+/-13.2), respectively (n=8). During fomepizole dosing, ethylene glycol t1/2 and elimination rate were 11.0 hr (+/-8.9) and 13.5 mg/dL/hr (+/-15.3), respectively. In 6 patients with serum ethanol levels before and during fomepizole treatment, the ethanol t1/2 and elimination rate were 4.3 hr (+/-2.6) and 25.1 dL/mg/hr (+/-32.6), respectively, prior to fomepizole, and 2.6 hr (+/-0.8) and 14.6 mg/dL/hr (+/-7.4), respectively, following fomepizole therapy. This would suggest that a combination of fomepizole and ethanol may not be reliable to decrease ethanol clearance during treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning.
    G) ETHANOL
    1) EFFICACY
    a) Ethanol competitively inhibits alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and prevents the formation of toxic metabolites (Wacker, 1965). The affinity of ethylene glycol for ADH appears to be similar to ethanol.
    b) CASE REPORT - A 16-year-old girl was treated with ethanol and sodium bicarbonate following unknown amounts of ethylene glycol ingestion. Arterial blood pH was 7.26, anion gap 25 mmol/L and osmolal gap 26 mOsm/kg H2O. Peak ethylene glycol plasma concentration was 14 mmol/L. Blood ethanol concentrations were maintained between 130-140 mg/dL (28-30 mmol/L) and were reached within 3 hours after starting therapy and maintained for 22 hours. 77% of the total body clearance was calculated to be due to renal clearance in the urine collection period. Hemodialysis was not performed. The patient recovered (Kowalczyk et al, 1998).
    2) INDICATIONS
    a) INDICATIONS FOR USING ETHANOL - The following guidelines were developed by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (Barceloux et al, 1999):
    1) Fomepizole unavailable
    2) Hypersensitivity to fomepizole
    3) PREPARATION
    a) CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE (V/V)
    1) In the United States, 5% or 10% (V/V) ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion is no longer available commercially (Howland, 2011). Ethanol 10% (V/V) contains approximately 0.08 gram ethanol/mL.
    2) ABSOLUTE ETHANOL or dehydrated ethanol, USP contains no less than 99.5% volume/volume or 99.2% weight/weight of ethanol with a specific gravity of not more than 0.7964 at 15.56 degrees C. Absolute ethanol is hygroscopic (absorbs water from the atmosphere) and when exposed to air may be less than 99.5% ethanol by volume (S Sweetman , 2002).
    b) PREPARATION OF 10% V/V ETHANOL IN A 5% DEXTROSE SOLUTION
    1) A 10% (V/V) solution can be prepared by the following method (Howland, 2011):
    a) If available, use sterile ethanol USP (absolute ethanol). Add 55 mL of the absolute ethanol to 500 mL of 5% dextrose in water for infusion. This yields a total volume of 555 mL. This produces an approximate solution of 10% ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion (Howland, 2011).
    4) PRECAUTIONS
    a) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) Hypoglycemia may occur, especially in children. Monitor blood glucose frequently (Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    b) CONCURRENT ETHANOL
    1) If the patient concurrently has ingested ethanol, then the ethanol loading dose must be modified so that the blood ethanol level does not exceed 100 to 150 mg/dL (Barceloux et al, 2002).
    c) DISULFIRAM
    1) Fomepizole is preferred as an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor in patients taking disulfiram. If fomepizole is not available, ethanol therapy should be initiated in those patients with signs or symptoms of severe poisoning (acidemia, toxic blood level) despite a history of recent disulfiram (Antabuse(R)) ingestion.
    2) The risk of not treating these patients is excessive, especially if hemodialysis is not immediately available.
    3) Administer the ethanol cautiously with special attention to the severity of the "Antabuse reaction" (flushing, sweating, severe hypotension, and cardiac dysrhythmias).
    4) Be prepared to treat hypotension with fluids and pressor agents (norepinephrine or dopamine). Monitor ECG and vital signs carefully. Hemodialysis should be performed as soon as adequate vital signs are established, and every effort should be made to obtain fomepizole.
    5) LOADING DOSE
    a) INTRAVENOUS LOADING DOSE
    1) Ethanol is given to maintain a patient’s serum ethanol concentration at 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% or 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line (10% ethanol is generally preferred due to the large volumes required for 5%). Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated. Begin the maintenance infusion as soon as the loading dose is infused (Howland, 2011).
    b) ORAL LOADING DOSE
    1) Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentrations. The loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (4 mL/kg) of 20% (40 proof) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube(Howland, 2011).
    6) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    a) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. Intravenous administration is preferred, but oral ethanol may be used if intravenous is unavailable(Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr)
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (1.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL*
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    b) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL DIALYSATE
    1) During hemodialysis maintenance doses of ethanol should be increased in accordance with the recommendation given below, or ethanol should be added to the dialysate to achieve a concentration of 100 milligrams/deciliter (Pappas & Silverman, 1982).
    c) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL-FREE DIALYSATE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL(Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002):
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL* - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (1.3 to 1.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    2) Variations in blood flow rate and the ethanol extraction efficiency of the dialyzer will affect the dialysance(McCoy et al, 1979).
    3) If the ethanol dialysance ((CL)D) is calculated, the infusion rate during dialysis (Kod) can be individually adjusted using the following expression (McCoy et al, 1979):
    Kod = Vmax x   Cp   + (CL)D x Cp
                 -------
                 Km + Cp
    where Cp = desired blood ethanol level
    *  Vmax = 175 mg/kg/hr in chronic ethanol drinkers 
    *  Vmax = 75 mg/kg/hr in non-chronic drinkers
    *  Km = 13.8 mg/dL
    

    7) PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) There is very little information on ethanol dosing in the pediatric patient (Barceloux et al, 2002). The loading dose and maintenance infusion should be the same as for an adult non-drinker. Loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (8 mL/kg) of 10% ethanol infused over 1 hour, maintenance dose is 80 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) of 10% ethanol (Howland, 2011).
    b) Blood ethanol concentration should be initially monitored hourly and the infusion rate should be adjusted to obtain an ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL (Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    1) Monitor blood glucose and mental status frequently during therapy (Howland, 2011). Ethanol-induced hypoglycemia is more common in children (Barceloux et al, 2002) and children may develop more significant CNS depression.
    8) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) Determine blood ethanol concentrations at the end of the loading dose and hourly thereafter until stable levels of 100 to 120 mg/dL have been achieved. Monitor blood ethanol concentrations at least three times daily once a stable ethanol infusion has been achieved. Monitor concentrations more frequently during dialysis.
    9) DURATION OF THERAPY
    a) SERUM CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE - Ethanol therapy should be continued until the following criteria are met:
    1) Ethylene glycol concentration, measured by a reliable technique, is less than 10 mg/dL.
    2) Glycolic acid metabolite is no longer detectable (Hewlett et al, 1986). This is usually not clinically useful due to the inability to obtain glycolic acid concentrations in a timely fashion.
    3) Ethylene glycol-induced acidosis (pH, blood gases), clinical findings (CNS), and osmolal gap have resolved.
    b) NO SERUM CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE - Following a significant ingestion or when clinical and laboratory data suggest ethylene glycol poisoning, ethanol therapy should be initiated immediately. In the rare instance when an ethylene glycol level would be unobtainable, ethanol therapy should be continued for a minimum of three days in the absence of dialysis or one day with dialysis, or until clinical findings resolve, whichever is longer.
    1) If the clinical findings have not resolved it may indicate the continued presence of ethylene glycol, metabolites, or both or some other etiology.
    2) Based on pharmacokinetic theory, 93.75% of ethylene glycol will be eliminated over a period of 4 elimination half-lives (Winter, 1988). Assuming a prolonged ethylene glycol elimination half-life of 17 hours during ethanol therapy (Peterson et al, 1981), pharmacokinetic theory would predict elimination of 93.75% of the absorbed dose of ethylene glycol over 68 hours (2.83 days). Based on pharmacokinetic theory, ethanol therapy (in the absence of hemodialysis) should be continued for about 3 days.
    10) ETHANOL/ETHYLENE GLYCOL INGESTION
    a) Patients who have concurrently ingested ethanol and ethylene glycol may have a normal acid-base profile and urinalysis despite a dangerously elevated blood ethylene glycol concentration. Consider implementing the ethanol treatment regimen in these patients until an ethylene glycol concentration can be determined. Determine blood ETOH concentration before beginning ETOH therapy and modify the loading dose accordingly.
    b) To modify the ethanol loading dose for the patients who have concurrently ingested ethanol, use the following equation to calculate the loading dose:
    1) LD = (100 mg/dL - blood ethanol concentration in mg/dL) x apparent volume of distribution
    1) The apparent volume of distribution for ethanol was obtained from the pharmacokinetic literature and is reported to be approximately 0.47 to 0.6 L/kg (Rangno et al, 1981; Baselt & Cravey, 1995).
    c) Note the loading dose obtained by this method is the amount of pure ethanol in mg/kg. It must be converted for intravenous and oral use to mL/kg. This can be accomplished by using the following relationship:
                       LD (mg/kg)
    LD (ml/kg) =  --------------------------------
                 (specific gravity  (concentration
                    of ethanol)       as a fraction)

    d) 10% (V/V) ethanol for intravenous infusion:
                     LD (mg/kg)
    LD(mL/kg) = --------------------------
                  (790 mg/mL) (10/100)

    e) 95% (V/V) ethanol for oral use:
                   LD (mg/kg)
    LD(mL/kg) = --------------------------
                  (790 mg/mL) (95/100)

    f) Calculation of loading dose assumes instantaneous absorption.
    11) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) In a retrospective study, the hospital records of 49 adults treated with ethanol for methanol (n=15) or ethylene glycol (n=32) ingestion were evaluated. Two patients ingested both methanol and ethylene glycol. Adverse effects developed in 45 (92%) patients, including tachycardia (heart rate greater than 100 beats/min; n=16; 33%), hypotension (n=9; 18%), decreased level of consciousness (necessitating intubation; n=10; 20%), agitation (necessitating chemical or physical restraints; n=35; 71%), seizures (n=3; 6%), vomiting (n=11; 22%), and phlebitis (n=5; 10%). It is unclear if the adverse effects were related to the ethanol, underlying poisoning or other therapies. Hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 4 mmol/L) did not develop in any patients. Four patients died; 38% were admitted to an ICU unit and 92% of patients (n=45) were treated with hemodialysis. Serum ethanol concentrations were obtained a median of 6 times per case (range, 0 to 24). Patients were treated with ethanol for 0.5 to 119 hours (median, 21 hours). Serum ethanol concentration was within target range (22 to 30 mmol/L) in only 27% of measurements; 47% were below the target range and 25% were above the target range. Inappropriate change in ethanol dosing was reported in 59% of the cases when a serum ethanol concentration was outside the target. Inappropriate dosing changes were also reported during 69% of the hemodialysis sessions. Overall, 92% of patients survived and were discharged home (Wedge et al, 2012).
    H) THIAMINE
    1) Thiamine, 100 mg intravenously daily, is recommended to stimulate the conversion of glyoxylate to alpha-hydroxy-beta-ketoadipate, a non-toxic metabolite (Parry & Wallach, 1974). Although 1 mg daily has been recommended (Harrison, 1980), this may not be a suitable dose in a nutritionally deprived patient (ie, alcoholic). The clinical benefit of thiamine administration for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning has not been demonstrated (Barceloux et al, 1999).
    I) PYRIDOXINE
    1) Administer 100 milligrams intravenously daily, to allow adequate stores of cofactor necessary for the conversion of glyoxylate to nontoxic glycine (Gibbs & Watts, 1970; Lavelle, 1977; Harrison, 1980). The clinical benefit of pyridoxine administration for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning has not been demonstrated (Barceloux et al, 1999).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) INDICATIONS: The American Academy of Clinical Toxicologists have developed the following guidelines as indications for hemodialysis (Barceloux et al, 1999):
    1) Severe metabolic acidosis (<7.25-7.3) unresponsive to therapy
    2) Renal failure
    3) Blood ethylene glycol 50 mg/dL (8.06 mm/L) unless fomepizole is being given and patient is asymptomatic with normal arterial pH
    4) Deteriorating vital signs despite intensive supportive therapy
    5) Electrolyte imbalances unresponsive to conventional therapy
    a) Porter et al (2001) recommend another criterion for initiation of hemodialysis to be serum glycolic acid level >8 mmol/L(Porter et al, 2001). In a retrospective review of 41 admissions for ethylene glycol poisoning, they found that patients with a glycolic acid of <8 mmol/L did not develop acute renal failure regardless of EG concentration, if adequate dosing with fomepizole or ethanol is maintained. In the absence of glycolic acid concentration, an anion gap >20 mmol/L or pH <7.3 predicts acute renal failure. Some of these patients were treated with hemodialysis, which may have prevented the development of renal failure in some patients.
    b) In the absence of both renal dysfunction and significant metabolic acidosis, there may be no need for hemodialysis with administration of fomepizole (Caravati & Herman, 2001; Sivilotti et al, 2000; Najafi et al, 2000; Watson, 2000; Barceloux et al, 1999; Borron et al, 1999). Thirty-eight consecutive acute ethylene glycol poisonings without renal failure were treated successfully with fomepizole, which was started early with no subsequent need for hemodialysis (Borron et al, 1999).
    c) Six pediatric patients with severe ethylene glycol poisoning (initial serum ethylene glycol concentrations ranging from 62 to 304 mg/dL {mean 174 mg/dL}), normal renal function and varying degrees of metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate range 4 to 17 mEq/L), were treated with either ethanol only, fomepizole only, or were given a loading dose of ethanol before conversion to fomepizole therapy. Metabolic acidosis was resolved with administration of sodium bicarbonate and intravenous fluids. None of the patients received hemodialysis. Treatment with ethanol or fomepizole was continued until the serum ethylene glycol level was less than 10 mg/dL. All of the patients recovered without sequelae (Caravati et al, 2004).
    d) In patients with large ethylene glycol ingestions, several days of fomepizole administration may be required before ethylene glycol levels are below the limits of detection. Thus, even in patients who present early and do not develop metabolic acidosis or renal insufficiency, it may be more cost effective to perform a single hemodialysis session that allows a 24-hour hospitalization rather than administer fomepizole monotherapy for several days of hospitalization (Vasavada et al, 2003).
    e) Sivilotti et al (2000) developed a model to predict ethylene glycol elimination during fomepizole monotherapy, because the decision to institute hemodialysis could depend on a predicted time course of ethylene glycol elimination in the non-acidemic patient. The authors suggested the rate of renal excretion to vary as a function of creatinine clearance, which they calculated from patient age, sex, and serial, non-steady state serum creatinine concentrations. Initial creatinine clearance may predict a rate of ethylene glycol elimination and confirm whether hemodialysis will be necessary to expedite ethylene glycol removal prior to accumulation of toxic acid metabolites.
    f) Najafi et al (2001) reported the treatment of ethylene glycol intoxication associated with severe acidosis (arterial blood pH, 7.17) primarily with fomepizole and aggressive treatment of acidosis with NO hemodialysis(Najafi et al, 2001). Renal function remained normal and acidosis resolved within 24 hours.
    2) EFFICACY - Hemodialysis is highly effective, but ethanol or fomepizole therapy should be continued during dialysis(Peterson et al, 1981). An ethylene glycol half-life of 2.5 hours during concurrent ethanol therapy and hemodialysis has been reported (Peterson et al, 1981). With ethanol therapy alone, the half-life was 17 hours.
    a) A patient with an arterial pH of 6.58 was admitted to the emergency department 14 hours following antifreeze ingestion(Bey et al, 2002). Aggressive therapy with IV ethanol, thiamine, folate, pyridoxine and hemodialysis was started. Arterial pH rose to 7.43 after 8 hours of hemodialysis. Acute oliguric renal failure and adult respiratory distress syndrome developed. Hemodialysis was continued for 7 more times over 23 days. The patient eventually recovered.
    b) Moreau et al (1997,1998) reported on glycolate (a toxic ethylene glycol metabolite) kinetics and hemodialysis clearance in ethylene glycol poisonings(Moreau et al, 1997). Glycolate was found to have a long elimination half-life (626 min +/- 474 SD, non-hemodialysis) and hemodialysis efficiently cleared glycolate (mean 170 mL/min +/- 23 SD).
    c) Following discontinuation of hemodialysis, redistribution of ethylene glycol may result in increasing ethylene glycol concentrations within 12 hours, necessitating repeat hemodialysis. Serum osmolality and serum electrolytes should be closely monitored (every 2 to 4 hours) for 24 hours following discontinuation of hemodialysis (Barceloux et al, 1999).
    d) It is necessary to increase the administration of ethanol (eg, addition of 95% ethanol to dialysate or increased infusion rates) or fomepizole during dialysis to replace drug lost during the dialysis procedure. Continue administration of ethanol or fomepizole after dialysis until serum ethylene glycol concentration is non-detectable or <20 mg/dL and the patient is asymptomatic with normal arterial pH (Barceloux et al, 1999).
    1) Faessel et al (1995) reported, in 2 cases of ethylene glycol poisoning with anuric renal failure, the mean dialysance following administration of fomepizole (10 mg/kg and 18 mg/kg, respectively) was 117 mL/min and 137 mL/min, respectively. This clearance corresponded to removal of fomepizole of 50 mg/hr and 83 mg/hr, respectively.
    2) One report describes the use of a 95% ethanol enriched, bicarbonate-based dialysate solution for the treatment of a massive ethylene glycol ingestion (40 ounces of antifreeze solution)(Nzerue et al, 1999). An intravenous ethanol infusion was concomitantly used. The authors stated that the enrichment of dialysate aided in maintaining intradialytic ethanol concentration between 98 and 130 mg/dL over the 8 hour dialysis session. The patient's renal status gradually improved over a 2-week period.
    a) The ethanol-enriched dialysate used in this report was prepared by infusing, with the aid of an infusion pump, 95% ethanol into the dialysate inlet tubing of the dialyzer with a side-tube at a rate of 40 mL/hr to make a dialysis solution ethanol concentration of 100 mg/dL (Nzerue et al, 1999; Chow et al, 1997).
    3) REQUIRED DIALYSIS TIME - Hirsch et al (2001) described a simple method to estimate required dialysis time following ethylene glycol poisoning, using an assumption that toxic alcohols have a dialysis clearance similar to urea. The proposed dialysis time is: [-V ln(5/A)]/0.06k, where V (liters) is the Watson estimate of total body water, A is the initial toxin concentration (mmol/L), and k is 80% of the manufacturer-specified dialyzer urea clearance (mL/min) at the initial observed blood flow rate. This method would limit the need for toxin concentration measurements to predialysis and postdialysis samples.
    B) HEMOFILTRATION
    1) Christiansson reported a case of multi organ failure in a patient with severe ethylene glycol intoxication(Christiansson et al, 1995). Because of circulatory instability and unavailability of hemodialysis facilities, CAVH-D was initiated to remove EG and glycolate as well as to treat renal failure. Dialysis catheters were incorporated into the right femoral artery and left femoral vein, and after heparinization, the patient was connected to a Hemospal A 1 flatfilter for dialysis.
    a) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration-dialysis (CAVH-D) was continued for 6 days, with ethanol concurrently administered. The patient was discharged 2 weeks after the poisoning with almost full renal function and no signs of neurological sequelae.
    2) Walder & Tyler described 3 cases of ethylene glycol overdoses treated with AV hemofiltration dialysis(Walder & Tyler, 1994).
    3) Donovan et al reported a case of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), with 4-MP therapy, for removal of ethylene glycol (EG)(Donovan et al, 1997). The elimination of ethylene glycol during CVVH with concurrent fomepizole therapy was less efficient than with hemodialysis, and was comparable to alcohol dehydrogenase inhibition therapy alone. Dosing with fomepizole during CVVH needs to be more frequent.

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    a) INHALATION
    1) Twenty prisoners were exposed to mean daily concentrations of ethylene glycol between 3 and 67 mg/m(3) for 20 to 22 hours/day for 1 month.
    a) Both blood and urine were collected at intervals during the exposure time and assayed for ethylene glycol. Urine ethylene glycol concentrations ranged from 1.6 mg/dL to 8.4 mg/dL, (0.26 to 1.35 mmol/L), whereas serum ethylene glycol concentrations ranged from 8 mg/dL to 21.2 mg/dL (1.3 to 3.42 mmol/L).
    b) Serious signs of ethylene glycol intoxication were absent in all volunteers studied, although complaints of pharyngeal irritation were common. Headache and low backache were reported occasionally
    2) Accidental inhalation over a period of several weeks of aerosolized ethylene glycol from a leaking automobile heater core resulted in complaints of headache, nausea, vomiting, malaise, and pharyngeal irritation. A serum ethylene glycol level of 28 mg/dL was measured. Treatment with oral, then IV, ethanol was successful (Wezorek et al, 1995).
    b) ORAL
    1) A 36-year-old epileptic man ingested an unknown amount of ethylene glycol and presented with ataxia and nystagmus, which progressed to stage 4 coma within 6 hours. Metabolic acidosis and hematuria were noted. The serum ethylene glycol concentration 12 hours after admission was 465 mg/dL. Hemodialysis was done for 15 hours on day 1 and 8 hours on day 2. The ethylene glycol concentration rapidly decreased to 18.9 mg/dL within 36 hours. Prolonged coma (7 days), seizures, anuric renal failure (8 days), bone marrow arrest (2 weeks), and cerebral edema complicated the hospital course. The patient recovered normal renal and neurologic functions (Bobbitt et al, 1986).
    2) A 30-year-old man presented approximately 24 hours after ingestion of an unknown amount of ethylene glycol. Signs and symptoms included fluctuating consciousness, blurred vision, nystagmus, diplopia, central facial weakness, and mild dysarthria. The following night he developed anuria, severe metabolic acidosis, and deep coma with flaccid tetraplegia. He was treated with hemodialysis. Coma persisted for 12 days, and renal insufficiency for 45 days. Complete recovery occurred. The admission ethylene glycol blood concentration was 40 mg/dL (Steinke et al, 1989).
    B) PEDIATRIC
    1) A 4-month-old infant was administered infant formula that was reconstituted with water which was 29% ethylene glycol. Serum osmolality was not obtained by freezing point depression and was reported to be normal which made the diagnosis difficult. Ethylene glycol concentrations were not available in a timely manner. The infant was treated only with sodium bicarbonate and supportive care.
    a) She developed complications of renal failure, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia, coagulopathy, rhabdomyolysis, hepatic dysfunction, hyperglycemia, status epilepticus requiring pentobarbital coma, blindness, and deafness. She was discharged with a severe seizure disorder and spastic quadriparesis (Shannon & Woolf, 1989).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: A consensus guideline recommends that children with more than an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or an adult with known accidental ingestion of more than a "swallow" (10 to 30 mL) should be referred immediately to a healthcare facility. Ingestions of 0.20 mL/kg of 95% ethylene glycol could theoretically cause a blood concentration in the toxic range (greater than 25 mg/dL). The approximate lethal oral dose of 95% ethylene glycol is 1.5 mL/kg.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) The minimum lethal dose is on the order of 100 mL in adults, although individuals reportedly have survived much higher doses (Hathaway et al, 1996; Budavari, 2000; Hunt, 1932).
    B) The lethal oral dose is also estimated to be 1.5 mL/kg or 1.56 g/kg (Lewis, 1998).
    C) Death has been reported after ingestion of as little as 30 or 60 mL, although ingestion of more than 3000 mL has been survived (Johnson et al, 1999; Brown et al, 1983; Field, 1985; Stokes & Aueron, 1980; Widman, 1946).
    D) Ingestion of one-fourth to one-half pint of antifreeze solution resulted in death from renal failure after 12 days (OSHA, 1990).
    E) Contamination of a dialysis water supply resulted in coma, acidosis, irreversible shock, and death in a 52-year-old woman with chronic renal failure (MMWR, 1987).
    F) PEDIATRIC
    1) An epidemic of children who developed somnolence, vomiting, ataxia, crystalluria, and hematuria was associated with a contaminated water supply containing nine percent ethylene glycol (MMWR, 1987).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) INGESTION
    a) A consensus guideline recommends that children with more than an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or an adult with known accidental ingestion of more than a "swallow" (10 to 30 mL) should be referred immediately to a healthcare facility. Children with an observed lick, sip or taste ingestion or a known accidental ingestion of less than 10 mL in an adult can be monitored at home (Caravati et al, 2005).
    b) Survival has occurred after ingestion of 240, 400, 1500, and 3000 mL (Johnson et al, 1999; Baud et al, 1988; Brown et al, 1983; Kahn & Brotchner, 1950; Seeff et al, 1970; Stokes & Aueron, 1980).
    c) Somnolence, vomiting, ataxia, crystalluria and hematuria in children were associated with a contaminated water supply that contained nine percent ethylene glycol (MMWR, 1987).
    d) Following the ingestion of 3000 mL of ethylene glycol (EG) antifreeze, a patient with an EG concentration of 1889 mg/dL was immediately started on hemodialysis and ethanol infusions before laboratory confirmation. When EG concentrations decreased to less than 20 mg/dL, both hemodialysis and ethanol infusions were stopped. The patient survived, in spite of complications of pulmonary edema and acute renal failure (Johnson et al, 1999).
    2) INHALATION
    a) The lowest published toxic airborne concentration for a human has been reported as 10,000 mg/m(3) (Lewis, 2000; RTECS , 2002).
    b) Human subjects considered an ethylene glycol (as vapor and aerosol) concentration of 205.5 mg/m(3) intolerable because of the irritation of the eyes and throat that exposure caused (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    1) Exposure to the vapor from the liquid heated to 100 degrees C has been reported to cause nystagmus and coma of 5 to 10 minute duration (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    c) Throat irritation and headache were associated with human exposure to an aerosol concentration of 12 ppm for 20 to 22 hours/day for four weeks. Increased upper respiratory tract irritation occurred with 56 ppm exposure, and upper respiratory tract irritant effects made exposure to 80 ppm intolerable (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    d) Exposure to vapor or aerosol at 69 mg/m(3) produced no symptoms, while exposure at 137 mg/m(3) produced recognizable taste, eye, and throat irritations (Wills, 1974).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Ethylene glycol levels greater than 20 milligrams/deciliter (3.22 millimoles/liter) are frequently associated with intoxication. As a rough estimate, ingestion of 3 milliliters of 100% ethylene glycol in a child weighing 10 kilograms (assuming a volume of distribution of 0.65 L/kg) would produce a potential maximum peak plasma level of 50 milligrams/deciliter. In the same child, an average swallow (2 to 8 milliliters) would produce a potential maximum peak level of 34 to 135 milligrams/deciliter.
    b) EXAMPLE: A 15 kilogram child ingests 30 milliliters of a product containing 90% ethylene glycol. Note: This example is based on a volume of distribution of 0.83 L/kg, which can vary depending on the source used (see Volume of Distribution below), and a specific gravity of 1.11 g/mL.
    Step 1.  Calculate dose ingested in mL -
               90 mL pure ethylene glycol
        90% = ---------------------------
              100 mL mixture
        90 mL     x
        ----- = -----   x = 27 mL pure ethylene
       100 mL   30 mL        glycol ingested
    Step 2.  Convert mL to mg -
       1.11 g/mL (specific gravity) x 27 mL =
        29.97 g = 29,970 mg
    Step 3.  Calculate volume of distribution in dL -
       Vd = 0.83 L/kg x 15 kg
          = 12.45 liters
          = 124.5 deciliters
    Step 4.  Calculate estimated maximal plasma
             concentration (Cp) assuming instan-
             taneous absorption 
            Dose   29,970 mg
       Cp = ---- = --------- = 240.7 mg/dL
             Vd     124.5 dL
    

    c) GLYCOLATE CONCENTRATIONS
    1) Serum glycolate concentrations were less than 0.5 millimole/liter (4 milligrams/deciliter) for 48 hours in a 37-year-old man with an admission ethylene glycol concentration of 110 millimoles/liter (683 milligrams/deciliter) (Malmlund et al, 1991). Early treatment (1 to 4 hours postingestion) included intravenous infusion of ethanol and 6 hours of hemodialysis.
    2) Serum glycolate concentration was 29 millimoles/liter (200 milligrams/liter) in a 22-year-old man with an ethylene glycol concentration of 7 millimoles/liter (43 milligrams/deciliter) (Malmlund et al, 1991). This patient presented 24 hours postingestion. Hemodialysis rapidly decreased the serum glycolate concentration. Treatment also included intravenous infusion of ethanol.
    3) Jacobsen et al (1984) report serum glycolate concentrations between 25 to 30 millimoles/liter (190 to 228 milligrams/deciliter) in severely poisoned patients (Jacobsen et al, 1984).
    2) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    a) INGESTION
    1) Ingestion of nine large glasses of antifreeze resulted in an ethylene glycol concentration of 500 mg/dL (Leon & Graeber, 1994).
    2) Ingestion of 500 mL of antifreeze by two adults each resulted in ethylene glycol serum concentrations of 679.2 mg/dL in one and 300 mg/dL in the other (Walder & Tyler, 1994). Ethanol and Co-Proxamol were co-ingested in the first case.
    3) A serum EG concentration of 146.1 mmol/L was reported four hours after ingestion of several cups of antifreeze in a 64-year-old man who survived following treatment (Curtin et al, 1992).
    4) Eder et al (1998) reported that a 58-year-old man drank about 20 ounces of half-strength antifreeze and had a serum EG concentration of 7910 mg/L (127 mmol/L). He made a complete recovery (Eder et al, 1998).
    5) A serum EG concentration of 1889 mg/dL was achieved by a 36-year-old man who ingested 3000 mL of antifreeze. He survived following antidotal therapy with ethanol and hemodialysis (Johnson et al, 1999).
    6) An initial serum ethylene glycol level of 706 mg/dL was reported in a 33-year-old man approximately 1 hour after ingestion of one-half gallon of antifreeze (Velez et al, 2002).
    7) Ingestion of 1 pint (approximately 473 mL) of antifreeze resulted in an initial serum ethylene glycol level of 284 mg/dL (Vasavada et al, 2003).
    8) CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old pregnant woman (26 weeks gestation) presented with speech difficulties, seizures, and hyperventilation, progressively deteriorating into a coma. Suspecting eclampsia and possible fetal asphyxia, a cesarean section was performed. Serum tox screens of both the mother and child indicated ethylene glycol poisoning, with ethylene glycol levels of 2480 mg/L and 2206 mg/L, respectively. The mother admitted drinking approximately 400 mL of ethylene glycol. Both the mother and child recovered following supportive therapy (Kralova et al, 2006).
    b) INHALATION
    1) Inadvertent inhalation of aerosolized ethylene glycol from a leaking automobile heater core resulted in an ethylene glycol blood concentration of 28 mg/dL (Wezorek et al, 1995).
    2) In 20 adult men exposed to concentrations of 17 to 49 mg/m(3), 20 hours daily, for four weeks, serum ethylene glycol concentrations were 94 to 182 mg/L (Wills et al, 1974).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS107-21-1 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Ethylene glycol
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA:
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling: 100 mg/m(3)
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A4
    2) Codes: H
    3) Definitions:
    a) A4: Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    b) H: Aerosol only
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): URT and eye irr
    d) Molecular Weight: 62.07
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS107-21-1 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Ethylene glycol
    2) REL:
    a) TWA:
    b) STEL:
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Not Listed) Not Listed
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s): See Appendix D
    3) IDLH: Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS107-21-1 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A4 ; Listed as: Ethylene glycol
    a) A4 :Not Classifiable as a Human Carcinogen: Agents which cause concern that they could be carcinogenic for humans but which cannot be assessed conclusively because of a lack of data. In vitro or animal studies do not provide indications of carcinogenicity which are sufficient to classify the agent into one of the other categories.
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Assessed under the IRIS program. ; Listed as: Ethylene glycol
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed ; Listed as: Ethylene glycol
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS107-21-1 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: HSDB, 2002 OHM/TADS, 2002 RTECS, 2002
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 5614 mg/kg -- caused pulmonary edema; induced changes in kidney (both tubules and glomeruli) and spleen
    b) 5.8 g/kg (HSDB, 2002)
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 5500 mg/kg
    b) 8050 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2002)
    c) 14.6 g/kg (HSDB, 2002)
    3) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 10.0 g/kg (HSDB, 2002)
    4) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 5010 mg/kg
    5) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 4700 mg/kg
    b) 6.14 g/kg (HSDB, 2002)
    c) 8540 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2002)
    d) 13,000 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2002)
    6) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    a) 2800 mg/kg
    7) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    a) 10,000 mg/m(3) -- caused lacrimation, coughing, and additional respiratory system changes
    8) TCLo- (INHALATION)MOUSE:
    a) Female, 1000 mg/m(3) for 6H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- fetotoxicity; affected pre- and post-implantation mortalities; changed newborn sex ratio; caused maternal effects to the uterus, cervix, and vagina
    b) Female, 2100 mg/m(3) for 6H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- caused maternal effects and fetotoxicity; affected pre- and post- implantation mortalities; changed litter size; induced developmental abnormalities in musculoskeletal system
    9) TCLo- (INHALATION)RAT:
    a) Female, 2500 mg/m(3) for 6H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- caused maternal effects and developmental abonormalities of the musculoskeletal system
    b) 8400 mcg/m(3) for 24H/12W- continuous -- caused changes in brain weight; decreased urine volume; induced weight loss
    c) 1 mg/m(3) for 32W-intermittant -- caused changes in respiratory system; affected kidney and liver, including acute renal failure and acute tubular necrosis
    d) 12 mg/m(3) for 8H/90D- intermittent -- corneal damage; death

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) NEUROLOGIC: Altered mental status: ataxia, slurred speech, and somnolence are commonly reported after ingestion of ethylene glycol (Parry & Wallach, 1974) and may be due to unchanged ethylene glycol rather than to oxalic acid (Levy, 1960). However, the aldehyde metabolite concentration (glycoaldehyde) is at its highest level about 6 to 12 hours post-ingestion, the time the CNS symptoms are most severe, and is probably contributory (Parry & Wallach, 1974).
    B) COMA is thought to be due to the effect of unmetabolized ethylene glycol and aldehyde metabolites (Parry & Wallach, 1974) on the central nervous system.
    C) METABOLIC
    1) Ethylene glycol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase to several toxic organic acids including oxalic acid (Figure 1). The etiology and pathophysiology of the CNS, metabolic, cardiopulmonary, and renal toxicity are primarily due to the formation and accumulation of toxic intermediary metabolites, especially glycolic acid (produces profound acidemia, oxalosis, and renal interstitial edema) and to a lesser but histologically important extent, oxalate production and excretion (Clay & Murphy, 1977; Bove, 1966; Pons & Custer, 1946). Unchanged ethylene glycol is thought to be responsible for the initial signs and symptoms resembling ethanol inebriation (Levy, 1960).
                               FIGURE 1
          Alcohol
       dehydrogenase
    Ethylene-> Glycoaldelyde-> Glycolic-> Glyoxylic-> Oxalic
     glycol                      acid       acid       acid
    

    D) RENAL: The renal toxicity of ethylene glycol may not be due to the formation of oxalic acid alone because only 3% to 10% is converted to this metabolite (Berman et al, 1957). In another study, less than 0.5% of the administered dose was excreted as oxalic acid (Wiley et al, 1938). Other metabolites of ethylene glycol (glycolaldehyde, glycolic acid and glyoxylic acid) when administered to rats caused significant renal tubular damage in the absence of significant renal oxalosis, suggesting that renal insufficiency is at least partially due to the formation and accumulation of these intermediate metabolites (Bove, 1966). In vitro studies suggest that calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals, rather than oxalate ions, may be responsible for some of the renal injury (Guo & McMartin, 2005). Another in vitro study showed that calcium oxalate, not the other metabolites, is the toxic metabolite responsible for renal cell injury (Guo et al, 2007).
    E) CRYSTALLURIA: Crystals of calcium oxalate can assume many forms including octahedral (envelope-like), prismatic (spindles, hippurate-like), or dumbbell shaped (Terlinsky et al, 1981).
    F) THIAMINE stimulates the conversion of glyoxylate to alpha-hydroxy-beta-ketoadipate, a non-toxic metabolite (Parry & Wallach, 1974). Thiamine is a necessary cofactor for this conversion via thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent carboxylase (Williams & Smith, 1968).
    G) PYRIDOXINE: A pyridoxine deficiency may decrease the activity of pyridoxal phosphate, an essential cofactor in the transamination of glyoxylate to glycine (Williams & Smith, 1968). Excessive body burden of glyoxylate following ethylene glycol metabolism may exhaust pyridoxine availability and enhance oxalate formation. Pyridoxine should be administered to allow adequate stores for the conversion of glyoxylate to nontoxic glycine (Gibbs & Watts, 1970; Lavelle, 1977).
    H) ETHANOL competitively inhibits alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and prevents the formation of toxic metabolites (Wacker, 1965). The affinity of ethylene glycol for ADH appears to be similar to ethanol.

Physical Characteristics

    A) Ethylene glycol is a colorless, clear, sweet- or bittersweet-tasting, viscous liquid. It is considerably hygroscopic; it is able to absorb twice its weight of water at 100% relative humidity (ACGIH, 1996a; Ashford, 2001; Budavari, 2000). It is heavier than water and will sink (and mix) in water (CHRIS , 2002).

Molecular Weight

    A) 62.07

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) 62.5 mg/m(3) (ACGIH, 1996a)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.1) AVIAN/BIRD
    A) SUMMARY - Clinical signs of intoxication include ruffled feathers, watery droppings, head resting, depression, lethargy, ataxia, closed eyes, dyspnea, decreased respiratory rate, drooping wings, and recumbent posture. Calcium oxalate crystals have been found in renal tubules (Riddell et al, 1967; Lowes, 1990).
    B) TURKEY - Depression, reluctance to move, death (Lowes, 1990)
    C) GOOSE - Lethargy, occasional tremors, recumbency, death (Riddell et al, 1967).
    D) CHICKEN - Depression, polyuria, ataxia, recumbency, dyspnea, decreased respiratory rate, and death (Riddell et al, 1967).
    11.1.2) BOVINE/CATTLE
    A) SIGNS - Vomiting, ataxia, and incoordination. Latent signs: anorexia, dehydration, seizures, coma, and uremia after 24 hours. Calcium oxalate crystals may be seen in the urine.
    1) Initially, ataxia, paraparesis, hyperpnea, and CNS depression may be seen. This may lead to recumbency and death. Epistaxis and hemoglobinuria may be seen if very high doses are ingested (Merck, 1991).
    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) SUMMARY - Signs of ethylene glycol intoxication in dogs include ataxia, dehydration, depression, polyuria, and vomiting. Laboratory abnormalities include high anion gap metabolic acidosis, serum hyperosmolality, isosthenuria (kidney cannot form urine with a higher or lower specific gravity than that of protein-free plasma), and calcium oxalate (monohydrate and dihydrate) crystalluria (Dial et al, 1989).
    1) CLINICAL SIGNS - Ethylene glycol toxicity in dogs occurs in 3 stages. The first stage is up to 12 hours post-ingestion, characterized by vomiting, CNS depression, ataxia, diuresis, and metabolic acidosis. The second stage is rarely seen clinically, but tachycardia or bradycardia may occur along with tachypnea. Stage three is the stage of oliguric renal failure and uremia leading to death. This is usually 12-72 hours post-ingestion (Beasley et al, 1989).
    2) ULTRASOUND - Ultrasonic examination of the kidneys may be a helpful adjunct in diagnosis. Increased echogenicity is seen in conjunction with anuria, and thus provides a guarded to poor prognosis (Adams, 1991).
    B) HYPERGLYCEMIA was noted in one dog in a study of 8 dogs with high serum and urine ethylene glycol concentrations (>0.05 g/dL) (Dial et al, 1989).
    C) UVEITIS - Anterior uveitis has been described in dogs with ethylene glycol intoxication (Martin, 1982; Fox et al, 1987).
    D) HYPOCALCEMIA - Hypocalcemia is not seen initially, but may be seen at 24-72 hours post-exposure. Hypocalcemia may be due to serum calcium binding to oxalate formed during ethylene glycol metabolism (Mount, 1989).
    E) HYPERPHOSPHATEMIA - Hyperphosphatemia may be seen in early or later phases or antifreeze toxicity. This may be a result of high phosphate concentrations in antifreeze, since it can be used as a rust inhibitor (Dial et al, 1989).
    F) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS - Metabolic acidosis occurs within 3 hours of ingestion, due to the early production of glycolic acid during the metabolism of ethylene glycol (Polzin & Osborne, 1986).
    G) HYPEROSMOLARITY - Normal serum osmolar gap is near 10 mOsm/kg; greater than 50 mOsm/kg indicates ethylene glycol toxicosis in the early stages, usually within three hours post-ingestion. This returns to normal by 24 hours post-ingestion. A serum ethylene glycol concentration of 100 mg/dL causes an increase of 16 mOsm/kg in the osmolar gap (Mount, 1989).
    H) URINALYSIS - Isosthenuria, possible casts, increased protein, decreased pH due to acidosis, glucose, and red and white blood cells. Calcium oxalate crystalluria may be seen, di- and monohydrate crystals, usually after 5 hours post-ingestion if they are seen at all (Mount, 1989) Merck, 1991). Substantial crystalluria supports a diagnosis of ethylene glycol toxicity (Coles, 1986).
    11.1.4) CAPRINE/GOAT
    A) SUMMARY - Ataxia, polydipsia, and constipation may be seen in the early stages in the pygmy goat. At 4 days post-ingestion, signs may include progressive hind limb ataxia, increased salivation, depression, recumbency, seizures, scleral congestion, vertical nystagmus, decreased rumen motility, hypothermia, serosanguinous urine, pulmonary edema, watery feces, and death (Boermans et al, 1988).
    B) CLINICAL PATHOLOGY - Azotemia, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, acidosis, hyperosmolality, increased anion gap, increased CPK, and increased GGT (Boermans et al, 1988).
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) INITIAL SIGNS - Ataxia, vomiting, diuresis, depression, hyperpnea and tachycardia (Merck, 1991).
    B) SECONDARY SIGNS - Later signs relate to oliguric renal failure and uremia, resulting in death (Merck, 1991).
    C) ULTRASOUND - Ultrasonic examination of the kidneys may be a helpful adjunct in diagnosis. Increased echogenicity is seen in conjunction with anuria, and thus provides a guarded to poor prognosis (Adams, 1991).
    D) CLINICAL PATHOLOGY -
    1) COMPLETE BLOOD COUNT - Red blood cells may appear as echinocytes; stress leukogram (Thrall et al, 1984).
    2) SERUM CHEMISTRY - Increased BUN (range 50 to 525 mg/dL), increased creatinine (range 5 to 19 mg/dL), hyperphosphatemia (range 5 to 15 mg/dL), hypocalcemia (range 3.8-11 mg/dL), hyperkalemia, decreased bicarbonate (less than 18 mEq/L), increased anion gap (Thrall et al, 1984).
    3) URINALYSIS - Isothenuria, decreased urine pH, hematuria, proteinuria, glucosuria, with sediment containing RBCs, WBCs, epithelial cells, casts, and calcium oxalate crystals (Thrall et al, 1984). Oxalate crystalluria may be seen after 3 hours post-ingestion in cats (Merck, 1991). Substantial crystalluria supports a diagnosis of ethylene glycol toxicity (Coles, 1986).
    11.1.10) PORCINE/SWINE
    A) CLINICAL SIGNS - Sternal recumbency, depressed reflexes, knuckling and trembling in hind legs, depression, anorexia, abdomen distended with fluid, pulmonary edema, death (Osweiler & Eness, 1972).
    B) CLINICAL PATHOLOGY - Increased BUN, decreased serum calcium, increased potassium, increased WBCs, increased band cells, decreased PCV (Osweiler & Eness, 1972).
    11.1.12) RODENT
    A) OXALATE UROLITHS have been reported in chronic toxicity studies in rats (Roberts & Seibold, 1969).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Gastric lavage is preferred over emesis. Treatment includes ethanol administration or fomepizole (Antizol-Vet(R)) (dogs), sodium bicarbonate, and supportive measures.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Begin treatment immediately.
    b) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    c) Remove the patient and other animals from the source of contamination or remove dietary sources.
    3) Treatment should always be done on the advice and with the consultation of a veterinarian.
    4) Additional information regarding treatment of poisoned animals may be obtained from a Veterinary Toxicologist or the National Animal Poison Control Center.
    5) ASPCA ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTER
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, 1717 S Philo Road, Suite 36 Urbana, IL 61802
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) Contact information: (888) 426-4435 (hotline) or www.aspca.org (A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center). The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    6) SMALL ANIMALS: Due to lack of reports of large animal intoxication with this substance, the following sections address small animals (dogs and cats) only.
    7) In the case of a poisoning involving large animals, consult a veterinary poison control center.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) EMESIS/GASTRIC LAVAGE -
    1) CAUTION: Carefully examine patients with chemical exposure before inducing emesis. If signs of oral, pharyngeal, or esophageal irritation, a depressed gag reflex, or central nervous system excitation or depression are present, EMESIS SHOULD NOT BE INDUCED.
    2) HORSES OR CATTLE: DO NOT attempt to induce emesis in ruminants (cattle) or equids (horses).
    3) DOGS AND CATS
    a) IPECAC: If within 2 hours of exposure: induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os.
    b) APOMORPHINE: Dogs may vomit more readily with 1 tablet (6 milligrams) apomorphine diluted in 3 to 5 milliliters water and instilled into the conjunctival sac or per os.
    1) Dogs may also be given apomorphine intravenously at 40 micrograms/kilogram, although this route may not be as effective.
    4) LAVAGE: In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    a) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times.
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/CATHARTIC -
    1) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer activated charcoal. Dose: 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and if necessary tracheal intubation.
    2) CATHARTIC: Administer a dose of a saline or sorbitol cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram). If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    c) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION -
    1) Wash exposed animals with soap and water. If possible, shave or clip long hair to facilitate thorough cleaning. All handlers should wear gloves and protect themselves from exposure.
    2) Some chemicals can produce systemic toxicosis via absorption through the intact skin. Carefully observe patients with dermal exposure for the development of any systemic signs and treat as necessary.
    d) OCULAR DECONTAMINATION -
    1) Rinse eyes with copious amounts of tepid water for 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, or photophobia persist, see your veterinarian.
    e) EMESIS/LAVAGE -
    1) Do NOT induce vomiting in an animal that is showing any signs of CNS depression. Do NOT induce vomiting in an animal that has already vomited. To not attempt to induce emesis in ruminants (cattle) or equids (horses).
    2) Do not advise animal owners to induce vomiting at home, as they usually cannot properly assess for gag reflex, etc. Have animal owners proceed immediately to their veterinarian for treatment.
    3) If the ingestion has very recently occurred (within 5 to 10 minutes), emesis may be induced cautiously. In the event of depression, gastric lavage with a curved endotracheal tube in place is preferred to prevent aspiration of vomitus/lavage materials. Pass a large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 mL/kg water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat ten times.
    f) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) After vomiting has abated, administer activated charcoal at a dose of 2 grams/kg orally via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and, if necessary, endotracheal intubation.
    g) CATHARTIC -
    1) A cathartic dose of magnesium sulfate or sodium sulfate at 250 mg/kg should be added to the activated charcoal if diarrhea is not present.
    h) DERMAL -
    1) In case of dermatologic exposure, bathe animal in mild detergent (animal shampoo or Ivory liquid). Wear gloves to avoid human exposure. Clip hair as necessary to facilitate removal.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Therapy is usually successful if started in the initial phase of toxicity, within the first few hours post-exposure. The more time that passes between exposure and initiation of therapy, the less successful the treatment is. If therapy is begun at 18 hours post-ingestion in small animals, therapy with sodium bicarbonate is necessary, but ethanol or fomepizole (Antizol-Vet(R)) treatment is not indicated, because the ingested dose of ethylene glycol has largely been metabolized (Beasley et al, 1989).
    B) DOG
    1) 4-METHYLPYRAZOLE (4-MP); FOMEPIZOLE (Antizol-Vet(R)) is currently available in vials of 1.5 grams fomepizole (4-MP) per 1.5 mL. When reconstituted with 30 mL sodium chloride for injection, the final dilution contains 50 mg/mL. Dogs may be treated with an initial loading dose of 20 mg/kg intravenously as soon as possible following ingestion or suspicion of ingestion of ethylene glycol. Doses of 15, 15, and 5 mg/kg should be administered IV at 12, 24, and 36 hours respectively, following the initial loading dose. Continue to dose the dog with 5 mg/kg every 12 hours thereafter until ethylene glycol has left the bloodstream, or the dog has visibly recovered (Prod Info Antizol-Vet(R), 1996).
    a) The following table demonstrates volume of fomepizole (4-MP) to administer based on a concentration of 50 mg/mL:
    INJECT IV AT:
     Initial Loading Dose12 & 24 hr After Initial Dose36 hr After Initial Dose
    Dog Wgt (Kg)mL of reconstituted Antizol-Vet(R) needed for dose of 20 mg/kgmL of reconstituted Antizol-Vet(R) needed for dose of 15 mg/kgmL of reconstituted Antizol-Vet needed for dose of 5 mg/kg
    52.0 mL1.5 mL0.5 mL
    104.0 mL3.0 mL1.0 mL
    156.0 ml4.5 mL1.5 mL
    208.0 mL6.0 mL2.0 mL
    2510.0 mL7.5 mL2.5 mL
    3012.0 mL9.0 mL3.0 mL
    3514.0 mL10.5 mL3.5 mL
    4016.0 mL12.0 mL4.0 mL
    4518.0 mL13.5 mL4.5 mL
    5020.0 mL15.0 mL5.0 mL
    5522.0 mL16.5 mL5.5 mL
    6024.0 mL18.0 mL6.0 mL
    6526.0 mL19.5 mL6.5 mL
    7028.0 mL21.0 mL7.0 mL
    Reference: Prod Info Antizol-Vet(R), 1996.

    1) Supplies of Antizol-Vet(R) (Orphan Medical, Inc.) may be obtained from from any of the following distributors: Burns Veterinary Supply, The Butler Company, JA Webster, Midwest Veterinary Supply, Penn Veterinary Supply, Sunbelt Veterinary Supply, or Victor Medical Company. Emergency information may be obtained by calling Orphan Medical, Inc. at 1-888-867-7426 (Prod Info Antizol- Vet(R), 1996).
    2) Dial et al (1994a) have found fomepizole to be effective in preventing renal failure in dogs poisoned with EG at an oral dose of 10.6 g/kg when fomepizole treatment was initiated within 5 hr and in 4 of 6 dogs when initiated within 8 hr of ingestion.
    b) Adverse effects following fomepizole therapy have included an anaphylactic type reaction in approximately 1% of treated dogs following the second dose. Clinical signs/symptoms included tachypnea, gagging, salivation and tremor (Prod Info Antizol-Vet(R), 1996). Fomepizole causes no CNS depression, no additional serum hyperosmolality, or osmotic diuresis at the recommended doses. Excessive doses may result in CNS depression. Fluid treatment may be less aggressive since the dog may be able to drink on its own (Dial et al, 1989) Letter, 1989).
    2) DOG - INTERMITTENT ETHANOL TREATMENT - Dogs may be treated with 20% ethanol in saline at a rate of 5.5 mL/kg body weight IV and 5% sodium bicarbonate at a rate of 8 mL/kg body weight IP. Both are administered every 4 hours for 5 treatments, then every 6 hours for 5 more treatments (Beasley et al, 1989).
    3) DOG - CONTINUOUS ETHANOL INFUSION - Dogs may be treated with a constant infusion of ethanol, using 30% ethanol and 1% sodium bicarbonate in saline. Begin by rapid infusion of 1.3 mL/kg, then reduce dose to 0.42 mL/kg/hr for 48 hours (Merck, 1991).
    C) CAT
    1) ETHANOL TREATMENT - Cats may be treated with 20% ethanol in saline at a rate of 5 mL/kg body weight IP and 5% sodium bicarbonate at a rate of 6 mL/kg body weight IP. Both are administered every 6 hours for 5 treatments, then every 8 hours for 4 more treatments (Beasley et al, 1989).
    2) FOMEPIZOLE (4-METHYLPYRAZOLE) - Dial et al (1994) experimented with fomepizole in cats poisoned with ethylene glycol. Initial dose of IV fomepizole was 20 mg/kg, followed 12 hr later by 10 mg/kg, and 24 hr after initial dose with 10 mg/kg of fomepizole and 30 hr after initial dose with 5 mg/kg of fomepizole.
    a) Results showed fomepizole treatment at 0 hr was most effective in preventing development of renal failure while fomepizole given 2 or 3 hr after EG ingestion was less effective than ethanol in preventing EG metabolism. The authors concluded that fomepizole should not be recommended as an alternative to ethanol for treatment of EG poisoning in cats.
    b) In vitro studies suggest that higher doses of fomepizole may be required to effectively treat cats (Connally et al, 2000).
    D) SUPPORTIVE CARE
    1) FLUID THERAPY - Begin fluid therapy at maintenance doses (66 mL solution/kg body weight per day). Correct for dehydration and stimulate excretion of metabolites of ethylene glycol and unmetabolized ethylene glycol.
    2) BICARBONATE - Add sodium bicarbonate to the IV fluids if metabolic acidosis is suspected. Formula for bicarbonate addition when blood gases are available: milliequivalents bicarbonate added = base deficit X 0.5 X body weight in kg. Give one half of the determined dose slowly over 3 to 4 hours IV. Continue to dose based on blood gas determinations. When blood gases are not available, administer 1 to 4 milliequivalents/kg IV slowly over 4 to 8 hours (Beasley et al, 1989). Maintain acid-base status with sodium bicarbonate, to maintain urine pH at approximately 7.5 (Merck, 1991).
    3) OTHER SUPPORTIVE THERAPY -
    a) FOOD AND WATER may be offered throughout treatment if gag reflex and postural reflexes are normal.
    b) URINE OUTPUT - Monitor urine output, since oliguria or anuria are possible.
    c) PULMONARY EDEMA - Monitor patient for pulmonary edema, because fluid overload is possible, especially if oliguria or anuria is present. Decrease rate of IV fluid administration to less than 66 mL/kg/day. Monitor blood gases if possible. Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygen via face mask or continuous-positive-airway pressure in awake patients or via positive-end-expiratory pressure in intubated patients. Maintain arterial PO2 above 50 mL Hg.
    d) FUROSEMIDE - Furosemide is indicated in the treatment of oliguric or anuric kidney failure and in treatment of pulmonary edema. Dosage is 2 to 4 mg/kg IV in the dog and cat.
    e) DOPAMINE - Dopamine is indicated as adjunctive therapy for oliguric kidney failure, at a dose of 2 to 5 mcg/kg/min, in conjunction with the use of furosemide.
    f) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS may also be necessary if animal becomes oliguric or anuric.
    g) HYPOTHERMIA - Keep animal warm, preventing hypothermia.
    h) VITAMINS - Thiamine (B1) and pyroxidine (B6) can be given, as these are cofactors in alternative metabolic pathways of glyoxylic acid (Beasley et al, 1989).
    i) SHOCK - Fluids and corticosteroids can be helpful in treatment of shock.
    j) CALCIUM - If the animal has a low blood IONIZED calcium or if severe hypocalcemia occurs, calcium may be given carefully. Calcium borogluconate may be used for seizure control at a dosage of 0.25 mL/kg of a 10% solution IV in 3 divided doses daily (Osweiler, 1985).
    4) LABORATORY -
    a) NEPHROTOXICITY - Ethylene glycol is nephrotoxic. Monitoring renal function tests and urinalysis is suggested for patients with significant exposure.
    b) On hospital admission: CBC, blood chemistry panel, complete urinalysis.
    c) ACID-BASE STATUS - Monitor acid-base status while treating with bicarbonate to maintain urine pH of 7.5 (Merck, 1991); monitor plasma bicarbonate every 4 to 6 hours during treatment.
    d) FOLLOW-UP - Instruct the owner to return for a follow-up appointment at which time physical exam and appropriate laboratory tests will be repeated, with emphasis on renal function tests and urinalysis.
    E) OTHER
    1) OLIGURIC RENAL FAILURE - Presentation in oliguric renal failure: correct fluid losses, correct acid-base status, and correct any electrolyte abnormalities. Maintain diuresis. Renal regeneration and/or compensation may take 3 to 4 weeks; in some cases, the renal tubules are damaged so severely as to be irreversible.
    2) ANTE-MORTEM DIAGNOSTIC TESTS - Several in-house test kits are available for use on serum or urine. These tests are reliable only in the initial stage (Beasley et al, 1989). Serum and urine concentrations of ethylene glycol >0.05 g/dL indicate positive exposure, but do not indicate the quantity ingested (Dial et al, 1989).
    3) POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS -
    a) GENERAL - Kidney biopsy or impression smear of renal cortex will demonstrate calcium oxalate crystals in the proximal convoluted tubules. Other signs may include renal edema, lung congestion, and hemorrhagic gastroenteritis related to acute kidney failure (Mount, 1989) Merck, 1991).
    b) POULTRY -
    1) TURKEYS - In turkeys, urate deposition may be seen in viscera, subcutaneous tissue, and synovial joints. Kidneys and ureters may be pale and enlarged. Histopathology may show calcium oxalate crystals in renal tubules (Lowes, 1990).
    2) CHICKENS - Kidneys are hyperemic, with tubular degeneration and round cell infiltration, and calcium oxalate crystals in kidney tubules (Riddell et al, 1967).
    3) DUCKS - Swollen kidneys with oxalate crystals prominent (Riddell et al, 1967).
    4) GEESE - Pale enlarged kidneys, calcium oxalate crystals in kidneys (Riddell et al, 1967).
    c) CAT - Renal edema, lung congestion, and hemorrhagic gastroenteritis (Merck, 1991).
    d) COW - Post-mortem signs may include perirenal edema, with kidneys swollen and dark (Merck, 1991).
    e) PIG - Subcutaneous edema, straw-colored fluid in abdomen and thoracic cavity, pulmonary edema, perirenal edema, pale brown kidneys with petechiae and ecchymoses. On histopathology, kidneys show tubular necrosis with basement membrane damage, and oxalate crystals (Osweiler & Eness, 1972).

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) TOXICITY VALUES (Undiluted ethylene glycol, minimum lethal dose).
    a) POULTRY - 7 to 8 mL/kg body weight (Merck, 1991)
    b) CAT - 1.5 mL/kg body weight (Merck, 1991)
    c) COW - 2 to 10 mL/kg body weight (Merck, 1991)
    d) DOG - 4.2 to 6.6 mL/kg body weight (Merck, 1991; (Grauer & Thrall, 1986)
    e) MACAQUE - 1.6 mL/kg body weight (Jones & Hunt, 1983)
    2) TOXIC TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS -
    a) DOG
    1) SERUM CONCENTRATIONS - When 9.5 mL antifreeze was administered per kg body weight, ethylene glycol concentration at 1 hour post-ingestion was 471 +/- 161 mg/dL; at 3 hours, 931 +/- 244; gradually decreasing to 557 +/- 85 at 12 hours (Grauer, 1984). When 11 mL ethylene glycol/kg body weight was administered, blood concentration at 1 hour peaked at a range of 528 to 1105.5 mg/dL; at 5 hours, 313.5 to 662.2; declining to 156.2 to 207.9 at 24 hours (Nunamaker et al, 1971).
    2) URINE CONCENTRATIONS - When 9.5 mL/kg was administered, ethylene glycol concentrations in urine were 3229 +/- 956 mg/dL at 1 hour post-ingestion, 3824 +/- 345 at 3 hours, 3973 +/- 167 at 6 hours, and gradually declined to the measurement taken at 12 hours post-ingestion of 3280 +/- 711 mg/dL (Grauer, 1984).
    3) TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS - When 11 mL/kg ethylene glycol was administered, tissue concentrations were (average mg/10 gm wet tissue): liver, 15.4; brain, 13.3; muscle, 11.8; kidney, 12.8; heart, 12.2 (Nunamaker et al, 1971).
    b) GOAT
    1) Rumen ethylene glycol: 130 mcg/mL
    2) Urine glycolic acid: 4 mcg/mL
    3) Ocular fluid glycolic acid: 2.3 mcg/mL (Boermans et al, 1988)

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Gastric lavage is preferred over emesis. Treatment includes ethanol administration or fomepizole (Antizol-Vet(R)) (dogs), sodium bicarbonate, and supportive measures.
    2) SUMMARY
    a) Begin treatment immediately.
    b) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    c) Remove the patient and other animals from the source of contamination or remove dietary sources.
    3) Treatment should always be done on the advice and with the consultation of a veterinarian.
    4) Additional information regarding treatment of poisoned animals may be obtained from a Veterinary Toxicologist or the National Animal Poison Control Center.
    5) ASPCA ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTER
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, 1717 S Philo Road, Suite 36 Urbana, IL 61802
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) Contact information: (888) 426-4435 (hotline) or www.aspca.org (A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center). The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    6) SMALL ANIMALS: Due to lack of reports of large animal intoxication with this substance, the following sections address small animals (dogs and cats) only.
    7) In the case of a poisoning involving large animals, consult a veterinary poison control center.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) GENERAL TREATMENT
    a) EMESIS/GASTRIC LAVAGE -
    1) CAUTION: Carefully examine patients with chemical exposure before inducing emesis. If signs of oral, pharyngeal, or esophageal irritation, a depressed gag reflex, or central nervous system excitation or depression are present, EMESIS SHOULD NOT BE INDUCED.
    2) HORSES OR CATTLE: DO NOT attempt to induce emesis in ruminants (cattle) or equids (horses).
    3) DOGS AND CATS
    a) IPECAC: If within 2 hours of exposure: induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os.
    b) APOMORPHINE: Dogs may vomit more readily with 1 tablet (6 milligrams) apomorphine diluted in 3 to 5 milliliters water and instilled into the conjunctival sac or per os.
    1) Dogs may also be given apomorphine intravenously at 40 micrograms/kilogram, although this route may not be as effective.
    4) LAVAGE: In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    a) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times.
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/CATHARTIC -
    1) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL: Administer activated charcoal. Dose: 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and if necessary tracheal intubation.
    2) CATHARTIC: Administer a dose of a saline or sorbitol cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram). If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    c) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION -
    1) Wash exposed animals with soap and water. If possible, shave or clip long hair to facilitate thorough cleaning. All handlers should wear gloves and protect themselves from exposure.
    2) Some chemicals can produce systemic toxicosis via absorption through the intact skin. Carefully observe patients with dermal exposure for the development of any systemic signs and treat as necessary.
    d) OCULAR DECONTAMINATION -
    1) Rinse eyes with copious amounts of tepid water for 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, or photophobia persist, see your veterinarian.
    e) EMESIS/LAVAGE -
    1) Do NOT induce vomiting in an animal that is showing any signs of CNS depression. Do NOT induce vomiting in an animal that has already vomited. To not attempt to induce emesis in ruminants (cattle) or equids (horses).
    2) Do not advise animal owners to induce vomiting at home, as they usually cannot properly assess for gag reflex, etc. Have animal owners proceed immediately to their veterinarian for treatment.
    3) If the ingestion has very recently occurred (within 5 to 10 minutes), emesis may be induced cautiously. In the event of depression, gastric lavage with a curved endotracheal tube in place is preferred to prevent aspiration of vomitus/lavage materials. Pass a large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 mL/kg water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat ten times.
    f) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) After vomiting has abated, administer activated charcoal at a dose of 2 grams/kg orally via stomach tube. Avoid aspiration by proper restraint, careful technique, and, if necessary, endotracheal intubation.
    g) CATHARTIC -
    1) A cathartic dose of magnesium sulfate or sodium sulfate at 250 mg/kg should be added to the activated charcoal if diarrhea is not present.
    h) DERMAL -
    1) In case of dermatologic exposure, bathe animal in mild detergent (animal shampoo or Ivory liquid). Wear gloves to avoid human exposure. Clip hair as necessary to facilitate removal.

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) GENERAL
    1) Rapid absorption from stomach and intestines in monogastrics. The rumen may represent a source for prolonged absorption of ethylene glycol (Boermans et al, 1988).
    11.5.2) DISTRIBUTION
    A) DOG
    1) When 11 mL ethylene glycol per kg body weight was administered, tissue concentrations were as follows (average mg/10 gm wet tissue): liver, 15.4; brain, 13.3; muscle, 11.8; kidney 12.8; heart, 12.2 (Nunamaker et al, 1971).
    2) Rapid distribution to all tissues. Peak blood concentration in dogs is 1 to 4 hours post-ingestion. Peak blood concentration in monkeys occurs at 2 hours post-ingestion (Beasley & Buck, 1980).
    11.5.3) METABOLISM
    A) SPECIFIC TOXIN
    1) Primary metabolism occurs in the liver:
    1) Ethylene glycol - - glycoaldehyde (oxidation by alcohol dehydrogenase; rate-limiting step)
    2) glycolic acid (causes acidosis and nephrosis)
    3) glyoxylic acid
    4)
    a) formic acid plus CO2, or
    b) glycine plus hippuric acid, or
    c) oxalate, which combines with calcium to form a soluble complex. Only 0.05 to 3.7% of ingested ethylene glycol is metabolized to form oxalate.
    2) These metabolic pathways are utilized to various extents by individual species. For example, cats favor the oxalate pathway, and rabbits, rhesus monkeys, and rats favor the pathway to CO2 and formic acid (Beasley et al, 1989; Beasley & Buck, 1980).
    11.5.4) ELIMINATION
    A) DOG
    1) 3.4 hours (Hewlett et al, 1989)
    2) Excreted unchanged by the kidney, via glomerular filtration and passive tubular resorption (Beasley & Buck, 1980). The half-life of ethylene glycol in plasma is 2.5 to 3.5 hours in dogs; however, when treating ethylene glycol toxicosis, the inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase in the liver greatly increases the half-life (Beasley et al, 1989).
    B) RODENT
    1) RATS - 1.7 hours (Hewlett et al, 1989)
    C) GLYCOLIC ACID -
    1) Excreted in large amounts in urine (Beasley & Buck, 1980).
    D) CALCIUM OXALATE -
    1) Excreted by the kidney. This complex crystalizes when its concentration increases and the pH decreases (Merck, 1991).

Sources

    A) GENERAL
    1) Primary source is automotive radiator antifreeze. In its original container, antifreeze is generally greater than 90% EG; as used in car radiators, it is commonly diluted 50:50 with water (Beasley et al, 1989).
    2) Other sources include coolant fluids, and diethylene glycol used in color film processing. Ethylene glycol is used also as an industrial solvent (Beasley et al, 1989).
    3) In Alaska, a mix of ethylene glycol and rhodamine B dye is used in marking roads and airplane runways when ice and snow precludes direct visualization of them. This can account for substantial wildlife losses (Amstrup, 1989).

Other

    A) OTHER
    1) GENERAL
    a) PROGNOSIS -
    1) SUMMARY - Prognosis worsens as time post-ingestion increases. Treatment must be begun as soon as possible after ingestion, preferably before any damage has occurred to the kidney tubules. If therapy is begun as late as 8 hours post-ingestion, prognosis is fair to guarded, even if no azotemia is present at that time (Dial et al, 1989). Dogs in severe metabolic acidosis, in comatose situations, or in acute kidney failure are less likely to respond to treatment, as they are in the terminal stages of toxicity (Beasley et al, 1989).
    2) ULTRASOUND - Ultrasonic examination of the kidneys may be a helpful adjunct in determining prognosis. Increases echogenicity is seen in conjunction with anuria, and thus provides a guarded to poor prognosis (Adams, 1991).
    b) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS -
    1) Ketoacidotic diabetes mellitus, hypoglycemic shock
    2) Acute gastroenteritis, Foreign body obstruction, Garbage poisoning
    3) Acute pancreatitis
    4) Lactic acidosis
    5) Encephalitis, Rabies, Leptospirosis
    6) Head injury, Trauma, Shock
    7) Anaphylactic shock
    8) Acute kidney failure, Nephritis, Uremia
    9) Drug overdoses: antidepressants, sedatives, tranquilizers, other psychoactive drugs, ethanol, methanol, aspirin, acetaminophen
    10) Mushroom toxicity (psychoactive)
    11) Plant oxalate toxicosis
    12) Reference: Merck, 1991; Mount, 1989; Osweiler, 1985

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AAR: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation, Bureau of Explosives, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, 2000.
    14) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices (Supplement), 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
    15) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices (Supplement), 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1996a.
    16) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Vol 1, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    17) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    18) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    19) ATSDR: Toxicological Profile for Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1997.
    20) Aabakken L, Johansen KS, & Rydningen EB: Osmolal and anion gaps in patients admitted to an emergency medical department. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:131-134.
    21) Abbondandolo A: Mutat Res 1980; 79:141-150.
    22) Ahmed A, Tschetter PA, Krasowski MD, et al: Massive ethylene glycol poisoning triggers osmotic demyelination syndrome. J Emerg Med 2014; 46(3):e69-e74.
    23) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    24) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    25) Amstrup SC, Gardner C, & Myers KC: Ethylene glycol (antifreeze) poisoning in a free-ranging polar bear. Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:317-319.
    26) Anderson B: Facial-auditory nerve oxalosis (Letter). Am J Med 1990; 88:87-88.
    27) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    28) Aronow R, Bhambhani K, & Sarniak A: Pitfalls associated with ethylene glycol determinations (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:359.
    29) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    30) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 2001.
    31) Balikova M & Kohlicek J: Rapid determination of ethylene glycol at toxic levels in serum and urine. J Chromatogr 1988; 434:469-474.
    32) Barceloux DG, Bond GR, Krenzelok EP, et al: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(4):415-446.
    33) Barceloux DG, Krenzelok EP, & Olson K: American academy of clinical toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:537-560.
    34) Barilyak IR & Kozachuk SY: Tsitol Genet 1985; 19:436-442.
    35) Barrueto F & Nelson LS: Ethylene glycol causing mesenteric ischemia?. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20(3):263-263.
    36) Baselt RC & Cravey RH: Ethanol, in: Baselt RC & Cravey RH (Eds): Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 1995.
    37) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    38) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    39) Battistella M: Fomepizole as an antidote for ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36:1085-1089.
    40) Baud FJ, Bismuth C, & Garnier R: 4-Methylpyrazole may be an alternative to ethanol therapy for ethylene glycol intoxication in man. Clin Toxicol 1986-87; 24:463-483.
    41) Baud FJ, Galliot M, & Astier A: Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning with intravenous 4-methylpyrazole. N Engl J Med 1988; 319:97-100.
    42) Baud FJ, Lambert C, & Bismuth C: Safety of oral or intra-venous 4 methyl-pyrazole (4 MP) in suspected ethylene-glycol (EG) intoxications (Abstract), In EAPCCT XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 16.
    43) Baum C, Langman C, & Oker E: Fomepizole treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning in an infant. Pediatrics 2000; 106:1489-1491.
    44) Beasley VR & Buck WB: Acute ethylene glycol toxicosis: a review. Vet Human Tox 1980; 22:255-263.
    45) Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A systems affected approach to veterinary toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1989.
    46) Berger JR & Ayyar DR: Neurological complications of ethylene glycol intoxication - report of a case. Arch Neurol 1981; 38:724-726.
    47) Berman LB, Schreiner GE, & Feys J: The nephrotoxic lesions of ethylene glycol. Ann Intern Med 1957; 46:611-619.
    48) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    49) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    50) Bey TA, Walter FG, Gibly RL, et al: Survival after ethylene glycol poisoning in a patient with an arterial pH of 6.58. Vet Human Toxicol 2002; 44:167-168.
    51) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, Vol 7. 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001.
    52) Bjellerup P, Kallner A, & Kollind M: GLC determination of serum-ethylene glycol, interferences in ketotic patients. Clin Tox 1994; 32:85-87.
    53) Blakeley KR, Rinner SE, & Knochel JP: Survival of ethylene glycol poisoning with profound acidemia. New Engl J Med 1993; 328:515-516.
    54) Blood FR: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1962; 4:489-491.
    55) Bobbitt WH, Williams RM, & Freed CR: Severe ethylene glycol intoxication with multisystem failure. West J Med 1986; 144:225-228.
    56) Boermans HJ, Ruegg PL, & Leach M: Ethylene glycol toxicosis in a pygmy goat. JAVMA 1988; 193:694-696.
    57) Borron SW, Megarbane B, & Baud FJ: Fomepizole in treatment of uncomplicated ethylene glycol poisoning. Lancet 1999; 354:831.
    58) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    59) Bove KE: Ethylene glycol toxicity. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:46-50.
    60) Boyer EW, Mejia M, & Woolf A: Severe ethylene glycol ingestion treated without hemodialysis. Pediatrics 2001; 107:172-174.
    61) Brent J, McMartin K, & Phillips S: Fomepizole for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Methylpyrazole for toxic alcohols study group. N Engl J Med 1999; 40:832-838.
    62) Brent J, McMartin K, & Phillips S: Fomepizole for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. New Engl J Med 1999a; 340:832-838.
    63) Breslin WJ, Phillips JE, & Lomax LG: Hemolytic activity of ethylene glycol phenyl ether (EGPE) in rabbits. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1991; 17:466-481.
    64) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    65) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    66) Brown CG, Trumbull D, & Klein-Schwartz W: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1983; 12:501-506.
    67) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed. on CD-ROM. Version 12:3a. Chapman & Hall/CRCnetBASE. Whitehouse Station, NJ. 2000a.
    68) Buell JF, Sterling R, Mandava S, et al: Ethylene glycol intoxication presenting as a metabolic acidosis associated with a motor vehicle crash: case report. J Trauma 1998; 45:811-813.
    69) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    70) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires August/31/2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    71) CHRIS: CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    72) Cadnapaphornchai P, Taher S, & Bhathena D: Ethylene glycol poisoning: diagnosis based on high osmolal and anion gaps and crystalluria. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:94-97.
    73) Caparros-Lefebvre D, Policard J, Sengler C, et al: Bipallidal haemorrhage after ethylene glycol intoxication. Neuroradiology 2005; 47(2):105-107.
    74) Caravati EM & Herman B: Treatment of two adolescent girls with severe ethylene glycol poisoning without hemodialysis (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:481.
    75) Caravati EM, Erdman AR, Christianson G, et al: Ethylene glycol exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(5):327-345.
    76) Caravati EM, Heileson HL, & Jones M: Treatment of severe pediatric ethylene glycol intoxication without hemodialysis. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:255-259.
    77) Carstens J, Csanady GA, Faller TH, et al: Human inhalation exposure to ethylene glycol. Arch Toxicol 2003; 77:425-432.
    78) Casavant MJ, Shah MN, & Battels R: Does fluorescent urine indicate antifreeze ingestion by children?. Pediatrics 2001; 107:113-114.
    79) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    80) Catchings TT, Beamer WC, & Lundy L: Adult respiratory distress syndrome secondary to ethylene glycol ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14:594-596.
    81) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    82) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    83) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    84) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    85) Chow MT, Di Silvestro VA, & Yung CY: Treatment of acute methanol intoxication with hemodialysis using an ethanol-enriched, bicarbonate-based dialysate. Am J Kid Dis 1997; 30:568-570.
    86) Christiansson LK, Kaspersson KE, Kulling PEJ, et al: Treatment of severe ethylene glycol intoxication with continuous arterio-venous hemofiltration dialysis. Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:267-270.
    87) Clay KL & Murphy RC: On the metabolic acidosis of ethylene glycol intoxication. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1977; 39:39-49.
    88) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2F, Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    89) Coles EH: Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 4th ed, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
    90) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    91) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    92) Connally HE, Hamar DW, & Thrall MA: Inhibition of canine and feline alcohol dehydrogenase activity by fomepizole. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61:450-455.
    93) Coon RA: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1970; 16:646-655.
    94) Corr P & Szolics M: Neuroimaging findings in acute ethylene glycol poisoning. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012; 56(4):442-444.
    95) Curtin L, Kraner J, & Wine H: Complete recovery after massive ethylene glycol ingestion. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:1311-1313.
    96) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    97) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    98) Darchy B, Abruzzese L, & Pitiot O: Delayed admission for ethylene glycol poisoning: lack of elevated serum osmol gap. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:859-861.
    99) De Leacy EA, Moxon LN, & Ellis VM: A report of accidental ethylene glycol ingestion in 2 siblings. Pathology 1995; 27:273-276.
    100) Denning DW, Berendt A, & Chia Y: Myocarditis complicating ethylene glycol poisoning in the absence of neurological features. Postgrad Med J 1988; 64:867-870.
    101) Depass LR: Fundam Appl Toxicol 1986; 7:547-565.
    102) Depass LR: Fundam Appl Toxicol 1986b; 7:566-572.
    103) Dezso A, Ramsden R, Saeed SR, et al: Bilateral cochlear implantation after ethylene glycol intoxication: a case report. Cochlear Implants Int 2011; 12(3):170-172.
    104) Dial SM, Thrall MA, & Hamar DW: 4-Methylpyrazole as treatment for naturally acquired ethylene glycol intoxication in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195:73-76.
    105) Doeden DJ: Methods for the determination of ethylene glycol. Vet Human Toxicol 1983; 25:96-101.
    106) Donovan JW, Burkhart KK, & Cienki J: Removal of ethylene glycol and 4-methylpyrazole with continuous venovenous hemofiltration. J Tox - Clin Tox 1997; 35(5):538.
    107) Dragun J: The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, 1988.
    108) Dreisbach RH & Robertson WO: Alcohols and Glycols, in: Handbook of Poisoning, 12th ed, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1987.
    109) Dribben W, Furbee B, & Kirk M: Brainstem infarction and quadriplegia associated with ethylene glycol ingestion (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:657.
    110) Druteika DP, Zed PJ, & Ensom MHH: Role of fomepizole in the management of ethylene glycol toxicity. Pharmacother 2002; 22:365-372.
    111) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    112) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    113) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    114) Dubejkovaskaja LS: Gig Trud Prof Zabol 1973; 10:1-4.
    115) Dy-Liacco MS, Tuttle-Newhall EJ, Collins BH, et al: Liver transplantation from a cadaver donor with ethylene-glycol-induced brain death. Transplantation 2003; 75:1056.
    116) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    117) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    118) Eder AF, McGrath CM, & Dowdy YG: Ethylene glycol poisoning: toxicokinetic and analytical factors affecting laboratory diagnosis. Clin Chem 1998; 44(1):168-177.
    119) Edinboro LE, Nanco CR, & Soghioan DM: Determination of ethylene glycol in serum utilizing direct injection on a wide-bore capillary column. Ther Drug Monitor 1993; 15:220-223.
    120) Eisenga BH, Kuslikis BI, & Cohle S: Confirmation of death due to ethylene glycol ingestion by measurement of blood and urine glycolic acid levels (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:482.
    121) Erdman AE, Mallea MC, & Jolliff HA: Is the osmolar gap (OG) a reliable surrogate for ethylene glycol (EG) measurement?. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:480.
    122) Factor SA & Lava NS: Ethylene glycol intoxication: a new stage in the clinical syndrome. State J Med 1987; 87:179-180.
    123) Faessel H, Houze P, & Baud FJ: 4-Methylpyrazole monitoring during haemodialysis of ethylene glycol intoxicated patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995a; 49:211-213.
    124) Faessel H, Houze P, Baud FJ, et al: 4-Methylpyrazole monitoring during haemodialysis of ethylene glycol intoxicated patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 49:211-213.
    125) Feierman DE & Cederbaum AI: Increased content of cyctochrome P-450 and 4-methylpyrazole binding spectrum after 4-methylpyrazole treatment. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1985; 126:1076-1081.
    126) Fellman DM: Facial diplegia following ethylene glycol ingestion (Letter). Arch Neurol 1982; 39:739.
    127) Field DL: Acute ethylene glycol poisoning (letter). Crit Care Med 1985; 13:872.
    128) Fieni F, Beckers JP, & Buggin M: Evaluation of cryopreservation techniques for goat embryos. Reprod Nutr Devel 1995; 35:367-373.
    129) Fijen J, Kemperman H, Ververs FFT, et al: False hyperlactatemia in ethylene glycol poisoning. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(4):626-627.
    130) Fox LE, Grauer GF, & Dubielzig RR: Reversal of ethylene glycol-induced nephrotoxicosis in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191:1433-1435.
    131) Fraser AD & MacNeil W: Colorimetric and gas chromatographic procedures for glycolic acid in serum: the major toxic metabolite of ethylene glycol. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:397-405.
    132) Fraser AD & MacNeil W: Colorimetric and gas chromatographic procedures for glycolic acid in serum: the major toxic metabolite ot ethylene glycol. Clin Toxicol 1993a; 31:397-405.
    133) Fraser AD, Coffin L, & Worth D: Drug and chemical metabolites in clinical toxicology investigations: the importance of ethylene glycol, methanol and cannabinoid metabolite analyses. Clin Biochem 2002; 35(7):501-511.
    134) Freilich BM, Altun Z, Ramesar C, et al: Neuropsychological sequelae of ethylene glycol intoxication: a case study. Appl Neuropsychol 2007; 14(1):56-61.
    135) Friedman EA, Greenberg JB, & Merrill JP: Consequences of ethylene glycol poisoning. Report of four cases and review of the literature. Am J Med 1962; 32:891-902.
    136) Froberg K, Dorion RP, & McMartin KE: The role of calcium oxalate crystal deposition in cerebral vessels during ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(3):315-318.
    137) Frommer JP & Ayus JC: Acute ethylene glycol intoxication. Am J Nephrol 1982; 2:1-5.
    138) Gardner TB, Manning HL, Beelen AP, et al: Ethylene glycol toxicity associated with ischemia, perforation, and colonic oxalate crystal deposition. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:435-439.
    139) Garg D, Lim T, & Irani M: A rare case of fatal stroke after ethylene glycol toxicity. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015:bcr2014208855.
    140) Gibbs DA & Watts RWE: The action of pyridoxine in primary hyperoxaluria. Clin Sci 1970; 38:277-286.
    141) Glaser DS: Utility of the serum osmol gap in the diagnosis of methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion. Annal Emerg Med 1996; 27:343-346.
    142) Goodkin DA: Ethylene glycol poisoning (Letter). Am J Med 1990; 88:201.
    143) Grant WM: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    144) Grauer GF & Thrall MAH: Ethylene glycol (antifreeze) poisoning, in: Kirk RW (Ed), Current Veterinary Therapy IX, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
    145) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    146) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    147) Guo C & McMartin KE: The cytotoxicity of oxalate, metabolite of ethylene glycol, is due to calcium oxalate monohydrate formation. Toxicology 2005; 208(3):347-355.
    148) Guo C, Cenac TA, Li Y, et al: Calcium oxalate, and not other metabolites, is responsible for the renal toxicity of ethylene glycol. Toxicol Lett 2007; 173(1):8-16.
    149) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    150) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2005; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    151) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 8/31/2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    152) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    153) Haley TJ & Berndt WO: Handbook of Toxicology, Hemisphere Publishing Corp, New York, NY, 1987, pp 518.
    154) Hansson P & Masson P: Simple enzymatic screening assay for ethylene glycol (ethane-1,2-diol) in serum. Clin Chim Acta 1989; 182:95-102.
    155) Hantson P, Vanbinst R, & Mahieu P: Determination of ethylene glycol tissue content after fatal oral poisoning and pathologic findings. Am J Forens Med Pathol 2002; 23:159-161.
    156) Hanzlik PJ, Lawrence WS, & Fellows JK: J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1947; 29:325.
    157) Harrison TR: Principles of Internal Medicine, 9th ed, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co, New York, NY, 1980.
    158) Harry P, Turcant A, & Bouachour G: Efficacy of 4-methylpyrazole in ethylene glycol poisoning - clinical and toxicokinetic aspects. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:61-64.
    159) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, NY, 1996.
    160) Haupt MC, Zull DN, & Adams SL: Massive ethylene glycol poisoning without evidence of crystalluria: a case for early intervention. J Emerg Med 1988; 6:295-300.
    161) Heckering PS: Ethylene glycol poisoning with a normal anion gap due to occult bromide intoxication. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16:1384-1386.
    162) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    163) Hewlett TP, Jacobsen D, & Collins TD: Ethylene glycol and glycolate kinetics in rats and dogs. Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:116-120.
    164) Hewlett TP, McMartin KE, & Lauro AJ: Ethylene glycol poisoning. The value of glycolic acid determinations for diagnosis and treatment. Clin Toxicol 1986; 24:389-402.
    165) Hilliard NJ, Robinson CA, Hardy R, et al: Repeated positive ethylene glycol levels by gas chromatography. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004; 128:e79-e80.
    166) Hochi S, Fujimoto T, & Choi YH: Cryopreservation of equine oocytes by 2-step freezing. Theriogenol 1994; 42:1085-1094.
    167) Hoffman RJ, Hoffman RS, & Nelson LS: Ethylene glycol toxicity despite therapeutic ethanol level (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:302.
    168) Hoffman RS, Smilkstein MJ, & Howland MA: Osmol gaps revisited: normal values and limitations. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:81-93.
    169) Howard PH, Boethling RS, & Jarvis WF: Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1991.
    170) Howard PH: Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals. Volume II: Solvents, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1990.
    171) Howland MA: Ethanol. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1419-1422.
    172) Huhn KM & Rosenberg FM: Critical clue to ethylene glycol poisoning. Canad Med Assoc J 1995; 152:193-195.
    173) Hunt R: Toxicity of ethylene and propylene glycol. Ind Eng Chem 1932; 24:361.
    174) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    175) Hylander B & Kjellstrand CM: Prognostic factors and treatment of severe ethylene glycol intoxication. Intens Care Med 1996; 22:546-552.
    176) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    177) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    178) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    179) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    180) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    181) IARC: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans- Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42, Supplement 7, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1987.
    182) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    183) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    184) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    185) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health & Safety, 4th ed. (CD ROM Version), 1-4, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
    186) IPCS: Concise International Chemical Assessment Document. No 22. Ethylene Glycol: Environmental Aspects, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
    187) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    188) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    189) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    190) Jacobsen D, Barron SK, & Simon Sebastian C: Non-linear kinetics of 4-methylpyrazole in healthy human subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 37:599-604.
    191) Jacobsen D, McMartin KE, & Ordinario AT: Changing crystalluria in ethylene glycol (EG) intoxication (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:460.
    192) Jacobsen D, Ostby N, & Bredesen JE: Studies on ethylene glycol poisoning. Acta Med Scand 1982; 212(1-2):11-15.
    193) Jacobsen D, Ostensen J, & Bredesen L: 4-Methylpyrazole (4-MP) is effectively removed by hemodialysis in the pig model (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:362.
    194) Jacobsen D, Ovrebo S, & Ostborg J: Glycolate causes the acidosis in ethylene glycol poisoning and is effectively removed by hemodialysis. Acta Med Scand 1984; 216:409-416.
    195) Jacobsen D, Sebastian CS, & Barron SK: Effects of 4-methylpyazole, methanol/ethylene glycol antidote, in healthy humans. J Emerg Med 1990; 8:455-461.
    196) Jacobsen D, Sebastian CS, & Blomstrand R: 4-methylpyrazole: a controlled study of safety in healthy human subjects after single, ascending doses. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 1988; 12:516-522.
    197) Jaeger A, Kopferschmitt J, & Berton C: The importance of the osmolal gap, European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists Scientific Meeting, Birmingham, UK, 1993.
    198) Jarvie DR & Simpson D: Simple screening tests for the emergency identification of methanol and ethylene glycol in poisoned patients. Clin Chem 1990; 36:1957-1961.
    199) Jeong KC, Foxman EB, & Mazbar SA: A bartender fixes a curious drink (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18:112-113.
    200) Jobard E, Harry P, & Turcant A: 4-Methylpyrazole and hemodialysis in ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34(4):373-377.
    201) Jobard E, Harry P, Turcant A, et al: 4-Methylpyrazole and hemodialysis in ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1996a; 34:373-377.
    202) Johnson B, Meggs WJ, & Bentzel CJ: Emergency department hemodialysis in a case of severe ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33:108-110.
    203) Jolliff HA, Megarbane B, & Waksman JC: The value of serum bicarbonate and base deficit in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol toxicity. A systematic review (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:245.
    204) Jones AW & Hard L: How good are clinical chemistry laboratories at analysing ethylene glycol?. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2004; 64(7):629-634.
    205) Jones TC & Hunt RD: Veterinary Pathology, 5th ed, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1983.
    206) Jonsson JA, Eklund A, & Molin L: Determination of ethylene glycol in postmortem blood by capillary gas chromatography. J Anal Toxicol 1989; 13:25-26.
    207) Kahn HS & Brotchner RJ: A recovery from ethylene glycol (antifreeze) intoxication; a case of survival and two fatalities from ethylene glycol including autopsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1950; 32:284.
    208) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    209) Karlson-Stiber C & Persson H: Ethylene glycol poisoning: experiences from an epidemic in Sweden. Clin Tox 1992; 30:565-574.
    210) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    211) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    212) Kralova I, Stepanek Z, & Dusek J: Ethylene glycol intoxication misdiagnosed as eclampsia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50(3):385-387.
    213) Kruse JA & Cadnapaphornchai P: The serum osmole gap. J Crit Care 1994; 9:185-197.
    214) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    215) Lacoma FJ, Oud L, & Kruse JA: Interference with blood lactate determination due to toxic substances associated with lactic acidosis. Crit Care Med 1997; 25(suppl):A53.
    216) Lamb JC 4th, Maronpot RR, & Gulati DK: Reproductive and developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in the mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1985; 81:100-112.
    217) Lavelle KJ: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Indiana St Med Assoc J 1977; 70:249-252.
    218) Leikin J, Toerne T, & McAllister K: A summertime cluster of antifreeze ingestions. J Tox - Clin Tox 1997; 35:512.
    219) Leon M & Graeber C: Absence of high anion gap metabolic acidosis in severe ethylene glycol poisoning: A potential effect of simultaneous lithium carbonate ingestion. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23:313-316.
    220) Leon M & Graeber C: Absence of high anion gap metabolic acidosis in severe ethylene glycol poisoning: a potential effect of simultaneous lithium carbonate ingestion. Am J Kidney Dis 1994a; 23:313-316.
    221) Levine M, Curry SC, Ruha AM, et al: Ethylene glycol elimination kinetics and outcomes in patients managed without hemodialysis. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 59(6):527-531.
    222) Levy RI: Renal failure secondary to ethylene glycol intoxication. JAMA 1960; 173:1210-1213.
    223) Lewis LD, Smith BW, & Mamourian AC: Delayed sequelae after acute overdoses or poisonings; cranial neuropathy related to ethylene glycol ingestion. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 61:692-629.
    224) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    225) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001a.
    226) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001.
    227) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, NY, 2000.
    228) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 9th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    229) Liberacki AB, Carney EW, & Bartels MJ: Identification of proximate toxicant for ethylene glycol developmental toxicity using rat whole embryo culture. Teratology 1996; 53:38-46.
    230) Loch-Caruso R: Environ Health Perspect 1984; 57:119-123.
    231) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    232) Lowes N: Deposition of visceral urates associated with oxalate nephrosis in turkeys. Canad Vet J 1990; 31:653-654.
    233) Lung DD, Kearney TE, Brasiel JA, et al: Predictors of Death and Prolonged Renal Insufficiency in Ethylene Glycol Poisoning. J Intensive Care Med 2015; 30(5):270-277.
    234) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    235) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    236) MMWR: Ethylene glycol intoxication due to contamination of water systems. MMWR: MMWR 1987; 36:611-614.
    237) Maier W: Cerebral computed tomography of ethylene glycol intoxication. Neuroradiology 1983; 24:175-177.
    238) Mallya KB, Mendis T, & Guberman A: Bilateral facial paralysis following ethylene glycol ingestion. Canad J Neurol Sci 1986; 13:340-341.
    239) Malmlund HO, Berg A, & Karlman G: Considerations for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning based on analysis of two cases. Clin Toxicol 1991; 29:231-240.
    240) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    241) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    242) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    243) Maronpot RR: Drug Chem Toxicol 1983; 6:579-594.
    244) Marr MC, Price CJ, & Myers CB: Developmental stages of the CD (Sprague-Dawley) rat skeleton after maternal exposure to ethylene glycol. Teratology 1992; 46:169-181.
    245) Marshall TC: Ann Rep Inhal Toxicol Res Inst 1979; 563-566.
    246) Martin CL: Ocular signs of systemic disease. Mod Vet Pract 1982; 77:935-940.
    247) Marwick J, Elledge RO, & Burtenshaw A: Ethylene glycol poisoning and the lactate gap. Anaesthesia 2012; 67(3):299.
    248) Maurer HH, Peters FT, & Paul LD: Validated gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for determination of the antifreezes ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol in human plasma after microwave-assisted pivalylation. J Chromatogr 2001; 754:401-409.
    249) McChesney EW, Golberg L, & Parekh CK: Reappraisal of the toxicology of ethylene glycol. II. Metabolism studies in laboratory animals. Food Chem Cosmet Toxicol 1971; 9:21-38.
    250) McCoy HG, Cipolle RJ, & Ehlers SM: Severe methanol poisoning: application of a pharmacokinetic model for ethanol therapy and hemodialysis. Am J Med 1979; 67:804-807.
    251) McGregor DB, Brown AG, & Howgate S: Responses of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay. V: 27 coded chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 1991; 17:196-219.
    252) McMartin KE & Heath A: Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning with intravenous 4-methylpyrazole (Letter). N Engl J Med 1989; 320:125.
    253) McMartin KE, Jacobsen D, & Sebastian S: Safety and metabolism of 4-methylpyrazole in human subjects (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29:471.
    254) Melnick RL: Environ Health Perspect 1984; 57:147-155.
    255) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    256) Moestue S, Akervik O, Svendsen J, et al: Fomepizole treatment prevents renal failure in severe ethylene glycol poisoning: report of two cases (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:269.
    257) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    258) Moossavi S, Wadhwa NK, & Nord EP: Recurrent severe anion gap metabolic acidosis secondary to episodic ethylene glycol intoxication. Clin Nephrol 2003; 60:205-210.
    259) Moreau C, Kerns W, & Tomaszewski C: Glycolate kinetics and hemodialysis clearance in ethylene glycol poisoning. J Tox - Clin Tox 1997; 35(5):506.
    260) Morgan BW, Ford MD, & Follmer R: Ethylene glycol ingestion resulting in brainstem and midbrain dysfunction. Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:445-451.
    261) Mount ME: Toxicology, in: Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine: Diseases of the Dog and Cat, 3rd ed. Ettinger SJ (Ed), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1989.
    262) Murphy CM, Vitto MJ, & Dulaney AR: Detectable serum ethylene glycol levels after subcutaneous injection of antifreeze. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2013; 51(9):908-909.
    263) Mycyk MB, Drendel A, Sigg T, et al: Leukemoid response in ethylene glycol intoxication. Vet Hum Toxicol 2002; 44(5):304-306.
    264) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002a.
    265) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    266) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    267) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    268) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    269) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    270) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    271) NTP: Seventh Annual Report on Carcinogens - Summary, National Toxicology Program, US Department of Health and Human Services, Technical Resources, Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1994.
    272) Nagano K: Environ Health Perspect 1984; 57:75-84.
    273) Najafi CC, Hertko LJ, & Leikin JB: Fomepizole in ethylene glycol intoxication (letter). Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37:358-359.
    274) Najafi CC, Korbet SM, & Hertko L: Use of fomepizole to avoid hemodialysis (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:540.
    275) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    276) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    277) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    278) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    279) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    280) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    281) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    282) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    283) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    284) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    285) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    286) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    287) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    288) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    289) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    290) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    291) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    292) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    293) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    294) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    295) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    296) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    297) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    298) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    299) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    300) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    301) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    302) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    303) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    304) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    305) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    306) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    307) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    308) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    309) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    310) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    311) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    312) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    313) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    314) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    315) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    316) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    317) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    318) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    319) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    320) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    321) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    322) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    323) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    324) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    325) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    326) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    327) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    328) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    329) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    330) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    331) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    332) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    333) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    334) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    335) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    336) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    337) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    338) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    339) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    340) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    341) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    342) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    343) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    344) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    345) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    346) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    347) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    348) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    349) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    350) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    351) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    352) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    353) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    354) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    355) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    356) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    357) Neeper-Bradley TL, Tyl RW, & Fisher LC: Determination of a no-observed-effect level for developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol administered by gavage to CD rats and CD-1 mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1995; 27:121-130.
    358) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    359) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    360) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    361) Nunamaker DM, Medway W, & Berg P: Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning in the dog. JAVMA 1971; 159:310-314.
    362) Nzerue CM, Harvey P, & Volcy J: Survival after massive ethylene glycol poisoning: role of an ethanol enriched, bicarbonate-based dialysate. Intl J Art Organs 1999; 22:744-746.
    363) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 8/31/2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    364) Olivero JJ: A comatose man with marked acidosis and crystaluria. Hosp Pract 1993; 86-88.
    365) Oostvogels R, Kemperman H, Hubeek I, et al: The importance of the osmolality gap in ethylene glycol intoxication. BMJ 2013; 347:f6904.
    366) Osweiler GD & Eness PG: Ethylene glycol poisoning in swine. JAVMA 1972; 160:746-749.
    367) Otoi T, Yamamoto K, & Koyama N: In vitro fertilization and development of immature and mature bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ethylene glycol with sucrose. Cryobiol 1995; 32:455-460.
    368) Palmer BF, Eigerbrodt EH, & Henrich WL: Cranial nerve deficit: a clue to the diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning. Am J Med 1989; 87:91-92.
    369) Pappas SC & Silverman M: Treatment of methanol poisoning with ethanol and hemodialysis. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 126:1391-1394.
    370) Parry MF & Wallach R: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Am J Med 1974; 57:143-149.
    371) Parsa T, Cunningham SJ, Wall SP, et al: The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23(6):787-792.
    372) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    373) Personal Communication: Personal Communication: H Larson, Orphan Medical, Minnetonka, MN, 1997.
    374) Peterson CD, Collins AJ, & Himes JM: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Pharmacokinetics during therapy with ethanol and hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:21-23.
    375) Peterson RL & Rodgerson: Gas chromatography determination of ethylene glycol in serum. Clin Chem 1974; 20:820-824.
    376) Piagnerelli M, Carlier, & Lejeune P: Adult respiratory distress syndrome and medullary toxicity: two unusual complications of ethylene glycol intoxication (letter). Intens Care Med 1999a; 25:1200.
    377) Piagnerelli M, Lejeune P, & Vanhaeverbeek M: Diagnosis and treatment of an unusual cause of metabolic acidosis: ethylene glycol poisoning. Acta Clinica Belgica 1999; 54:351-356.
    378) Pizon AF & Brooks DE: Hyperosmolality: another indication for hemodialysis following acute ethylene glycol poisoningPIZON2006. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(2):181-183.
    379) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    380) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    381) Polzin DJ & Osborne CA: Anion Gap--Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications, in: Kirk RW (Ed), Current Veterinary Therapy IX, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
    382) Pons CA & Custer RP: Acute ethylene glycol poisoning. A clinico-pathologic report of eighteen fatal cases. Am J Med Sci 1946; 211:544-552.
    383) Porter WH & Jarrells MC: Improved specificity for ethylene glycol determined as the phenylboronate by capillary column gas chromatography. Clin Chem 1994; 40:850-851.
    384) Porter WH, Crellin M, & Rutter PW: Interference by glycolic acid in the Beckman Synchron method for lactate: a useful clue for unsuspected ethylene glycol intoxication. Clin Chem 2000; 46:874-875.
    385) Porter WH, Rutter PW, & Bush BA: Ethylene glycol toxicity: the role of serum glycolic acid in hemodialysis. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:607-615.
    386) Price CJ, Kimmel CA, & Tyl RW: The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1985; 81:113-127.
    387) Product Information: ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, fomepizole IV injection. Jazz Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Palo Alto, CA, 2006.
    388) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    389) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    390) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 8/31/2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    391) Rangno RE, Kreeft JH, & Sitar DS: Ethanol 'dose-dependent' elimination: Michaelis-Menten V classical kinetic analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 12:667-673.
    392) Reddy NJ, Lewis LD, Gardner TB, et al: Two cases of rapid onset Parkinson's syndrome following toxic ingestion of ethylene glycol and methanol. Clin Pharm Ther 2007; 81(1):114-121.
    393) Riddell C, Nielsen SW, & Kersting: Ethylene glycol poisoning in poultry. JAVMA 1967; 150:1531-1535.
    394) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    395) Roberts JA & Seibold HR: Ethylene glycol toxicity in the monkey. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1969; 15:624-631.
    396) Robinson CA, Scott JW, & Ketchum C: Propylene glycol interference with ethylene glycol procedures. Clin Chem 1983; 29:727.
    397) Rossa V & Weber U: Effects of ethylene glycol on rabbit retinas. Opthalmologica 1990; 200:98-103.
    398) Rowe VK & Wolf MA: Glycols, in: Clayton GD & Clayton FE (Eds), Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd ed, Vol 3, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1982.
    399) Rzepecki J & Fabicka B: Severe ethylene glycol poisonings, pH below 6,7 (Abstract), EAPCCT, XV Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992, pp 92.
    400) S Budavari : The Merck Index, 12th ed. on CD ROM. Merck & Co, Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ. 2000.
    401) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Pharmaceutical Press. London, England (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    402) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    403) Schuler RL, Hardin BD, & Niemeier RW: Results of testing fifteen glycol ethers in a short-term in vivo reproductive toxicity assay. Environ Health Perspect 1984; 57:141-146.
    404) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    405) Scully RE, Galdabini JJ, & McNeely BU: Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Case 38-1979. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:650-657.
    406) Seeff LB, Hendler ED, & Hosten HO: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Survival after ingestion of 400 mL with 42 days of oliguria and 17 days of coma. Med Ann DC 1970; 39:31-35.
    407) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    408) Shannon MW & Woolf A: Severe untreated ethylene glycol intoxication in a 4-month-old infant (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1989; 31:348.
    409) Sharma N & Jain S: Toxicity of brake oil. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:267-268.
    410) Shepard TH: Shepard's Catalog of Teratogenic Agents, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1995, pp 176.
    411) Shoemaker JD, Lynch RE, & Hoffmann JW: Misidentification of propionic acid as ethylene glycol in a patient with methylmalonic acidemia. J Pediatr 1992; 120:417-421.
    412) Singh M, Murtaza M, & D'Souza N: Abdominal pain and lactic acidosis with ethylene glycol poisoning (letter). Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:529-530.
    413) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    414) Sivilotti MLA, Burns MJ, & McMartin KE: Toxicokinetics of ethylene glycol during fomepizole therapy: implications for management. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36:114-125.
    415) Sivilotti MLA, Burns MJ, McMartin KE, et al: Toxicokinetics of ethylene glycol during fomepizole therapy: implications for management. Ann Emerg Med 2000a; 36(2):114-125.
    416) Smith BJ, Anderson BG, & Smith SA: Early effects of ethylene glycol on the ultrastructure of the renal cortex in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1990; 51:89-96.
    417) Smith RA & Lang DG: Rapid determination of ethylene glycol and glycolic acid in biological fluids. Vet Human Toxicol 2000; 42:358-360.
    418) Spillane L, Roberts JR, & Meyer AE: Multiple cranial nerve deficits after ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:208-210.
    419) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    420) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    421) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    422) Steinhart B: Case report: severe ethylene glycol intoxication with normal osmolal gap - "a chilling thought. J Emerg Med 1990; 8:583-585.
    423) Steinke W, Arendt G, & Mull M: Good recovery after sublethal ethylene glycol intoxication: serial EEG and CT findings. J Neurol 1989; 236:170-173.
    424) Stokes JB III & Aueron F: Prevention of organ damage in massive ethylene glycol ingestion. JAMA 1980; 243:2065-2066.
    425) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    426) Sztajnkrycer MD & Scaglione JM: Falsely elevated osmol gap due to hypertonic hyponatremia. J Emerg Med 2005; 28(4):455-457.
    427) Tadokoro M, Ozono Y, & Hara K: A case of acute renal failure due to ethylene glycol intoxication (MEDLINE abstract). Nippon Jinzo Gakkai Shi 1995; 37:353-356.
    428) Terlinsky AS, Grochowski J, & Geoly KL: Identification of atypical calcium oxalate crystalluria following ethylene glycol ingestion. Am J Clin Pathol 1981; 76:223-226.
    429) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    430) Thrall MA, Grauer GF, & Mero KN: Clinicopathologic findings in dogs and cats with ethylene glycol intoxication. JAVMA 1984; 184:37-41.
    431) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    432) Tobe TJM, Branko-Braam G, & Meulenbelt J: Ethylene glycol poisoning mimicking Snow White (letter). Lancet 2002; 359:444-445.
    433) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    434) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    435) Troisi FM: Chronic intoxication by ethylene glycol vapour. Br J Ind Med 1950; 7:65-69.
    436) Tyl RW, Ballantyne B, & Fisher LC: Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol aerosol in CD-1 mice by nose-only exposure. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1995b; 27:49-62.
    437) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    438) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    439) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    440) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    441) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    442) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    443) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    444) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    445) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    446) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    447) Urben PG: Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, Volumes 1 & 2, 6th ed, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, England, 1999.
    448) Vale JA, Widdop B, & Bluett NH: Ethylene glycol poisoning. Postgrad Med J 1976; 52:598-602.
    449) Vasavada N, Williams C, & Hellman RN: Ethylene glycol intoxication: case report and pharmacokinetic perspectives. Pharmacother 2003; 23:1652-1658.
    450) Velez LI, Lynton R, Shepherd G, et al: Massive ethylene glycol ingestion treated without hemodialysis. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:333.
    451) Verrilli MR, Deyling CL, & Pippenger CE: Fatal ethylene glycol intoxication: report of a case and review of the literature. Cleveland Clin J Med 1987; 54:289-295.
    452) Verschueren K: Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 4th ed. CD-ROM version, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 2000.
    453) Verschueren K: Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 4th ed. CD-ROM version. Wiley-Interscience. Hoboken, NJ. 2001.
    454) Volkmann E: Chem Abstr 1953; 47:9567.
    455) Wacker: Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning with ethyl alcohol. JAMA 1965; 194:173-175.
    456) Wahl A, Azaroual N, & Imbenotte M: Poisoning with methanol and ethylene glycol: 1H NMR spectroscopy as an effective clinical tool for diagnosis and quantification. Toxicol 1998; 128:73-81.
    457) Walder AD & Tyler CKG: Ethylene glycol antifreeze poisoning. Anaesthesia 1994; 49:964-967.
    458) Wallace K, Suchard J, & Curry S: Accuracy and reliability of urine fluorescence by Wood's lamp examination for antifreeze ingestion (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:669.
    459) Wallace KL, Suchard JR, & Curry SC: Diagnostic use of physicians' detection of urine fluorescence in a simulated ingestion of sodium fluorescein-containing antifreeze. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38:49-54.
    460) Watson W, Brent J, & Barceloux D: Outcome of ethylene glycol toxicity after ethanol treatment (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:480.
    461) Watson WA: Ethylene glycol toxicity: closing in on rational, evidence-based treatment. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36:139-141.
    462) Wax P, Branton T, & Cobaugh D: False positive ethylene glycol determination by enzyme assay in patients with chronic acetaminophen hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:604.
    463) Wedge MK, Natarajan S, Johanson C, et al: The safety of ethanol infusions for the treatment of methanol or ethylene glycol intoxication: an observational study. CJEM 2012; 14(5):283-289.
    464) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    465) Wezorek C, Hodgman M, & Dean B: Inadvertent ethylene glycol inhalation resulting in a toxic level (Abstract). J Toxicol--Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:553.
    466) Widman C: A few cases of ethylene glycol intoxication. Acta Med Scand 1946; 126:295.
    467) Wiley FH, Hueper WC, & Bergen DS: The formation of oxalic acid from ethylene glycol and related solvents. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1938; 20:269-277.
    468) Williams HE & Smith LH: Disorders of oxalate metabolism. Am J Med 1968; 45:715-735.
    469) Wills JH, Coulston F, & Harris ES: Inhalation of aerolized ethylene glycol by man. Clin Toxicol 1974; 7:463-476.
    470) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    471) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    472) Winter ME: Basic Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed, Applied Therapeutics, Inc, Vancouver, WA, 1988.
    473) Wolff M, Schaefer N, Rabe C, et al: Successful transplantation of a liver from a donor with fatal ethylene glycol poisoning. Liver Transpl 2005; 11(8):990-992.
    474) Woo MY, Greenway DC, Nadler SP, et al: Artifactual elevation of lactate in ethylene glycol poisoning. J Emerg Med 2003; 25:289-293.
    475) Woolf AD, Wynshaw-Boris A, & Rinaldo P: Intentional infantile ethylene glycol poisoning presenting as an inherited metabolic disorder. J Pediatr 1992; 120:421-424.
    476) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    477) Yao HH & Porter WH: Simultaneous determination of ethylene glycol and its major toxic metabolite, glycolic acid, in serum by gas chromatography. Clin Chem 1996; 42:292-297.
    478) Zeiss J, Velasco ME, & McCann KM: Cerebral CT of lethal ethylene glycol intoxication with pathologic correlation. Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10:440-442.
    479) Zhou L, Zabad R, & Lewis RA: Ethylene glycol intoxication: electrophysiological studies suggest a polyradiculopathy. Neurology 2002; 59(11):1809-1810.