MOBILE VIEW  | 

ELTROMBOPAG

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Eltrombopag is a biphenyl hydrazone that acts as a thrombopoietin receptor agonist. It is able to interact with the transmembrane domain of the thrombopoietin receptor leading to increased platelet production.

Specific Substances

    1) Eltrombopag Olamine
    2) Eltrombopagum Olaminum
    3) Eltrombopagum
    4) CAS 496775-61-2 (Eltrombopag)
    5) CAS 496775-62-3 (Eltrombopag olamine)
    6) ATC B02BX05 (Eltrombopag)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) ELTROMBOPAG: C25H22N4O4
    2) ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE: C25H22N4O4.2(C2H7NO)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Eltrombopag is available as 12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg tablets (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2015a).
    B) USES
    1) Eltrombopag is used to treat patients with thrombocytopenia in individuals with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have not adequately responded to other therapies (eg, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy), for patients with thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C to allow the initiation and maintenance of interferon-based therapy, and for patients with severe aplastic anemia who have had an insufficient response to immunosuppressive therapy (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2015a).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Eltrombopag is used for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have not responded to other therapies. It is only intended for ITP patients at significant risk for bleeding.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist. It is able to interact with the transmembrane domain of the human TPO-receptor and initiates signaling cascades that induce proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes from bone marrow progenitor cells.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive exposure may increase platelet counts and result in thrombotic and/or thromboembolic events.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Eltrombopag is only available through a restricted distribution program due to the risk of hepatotoxicity. At the time of this review, the overall risk of exposure is limited.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: SERIOUS: Potentially serious events reported with therapy have included: abnormal increase in liver enzymes and bilirubin, thrombotic/thromboembolic complications, and the development of hemorrhage following the discontinuation of therapy. OTHER: Nausea, vomiting, menorrhagia, myalgia, paresthesia, cataract, dyspepsia, ecchymosis, thrombocytopenia and conjunctival hemorrhage have been observed with therapy.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: It is anticipated that toxicity is likely an extension of pharmacologic events which may include the development of thrombocytosis, hepatotoxicity, bone marrow reticulin formation and bone marrow fibrosis. Rash, bradycardia, elevated aminotransferase concentrations, and thrombocytosis have been reported after overdose. Hemorrhage may also be observed as a result of rebound thrombocytopenia following the discontinuation of therapy.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: An excessive increase in platelet count may increase the risk of developing a thrombotic and/or thromboembolic events.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Fever may develop with therapeutic use of eltrombopag.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Eltrombopag has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of eltrombopag use in pregnancy.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) At the time of this review, no human data were available to assess the potential carcinogenic activity of eltrombopag.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Drug levels are not widely available or useful to guide thearpy.
    B) Monitor serial CBC with differential and platelet counts until platelet count has peaked and begun to decline.
    C) Monitor vital signs and liver enzyme concentrations after significant overdose.
    D) Monitor electrolytes and fluid status in patients with significant vomiting.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) An excessive exposure may increase the platelet count leading to the development of thrombotic/thromboembolic events. Monitor serial CBC and platelet counts. Evidence of an acute thrombotic/thromboembolic event (e.g., sudden onset of swelling/tenderness in a limb and/or shortness of breath) requires prompt diagnostic evaluation (e.g., ultrasound, CT scan, venogram, etc) and intervention as indicated. Cytapheresis may be useful in patients who develop severe thrombocytosis. Monitor for rebound thrombocytopenia and potential bleeding following the discontinuation of eltrombopag therapy. Transfuse patient as indicated for severe thrombocytopenia, bleeding. Hepatotoxicity has been observed with therapy; monitor liver function (i.e., ALT, AST, and bilirubin) following overdose.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal in a patient who is awake and alert and able to protect their airway. Based on limited experience, oral administration of a metal cation-containing preparation (e.g., calcium, aluminum, or magnesium) may be used to chelate eltrombopag and limit absorption.
    2) HOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal, if the patient is able to maintain airway or if airway is protected. Based on limited experience, oral administration of a metal cation-containing preparation (e.g., calcium, aluminum, or magnesium) may be used to chelate eltrombopag and limit absorption.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Assess airway patency. Oxygen therapy may be required in patients who develop a thromboembolic event, but this is rare with therapeutic use.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) None.
    F) BLEEDING
    1) Rebound thrombocytopenia has been observed with the discontinuation of eltrombopag therapy. Monitor CBC and platelet counts. Blood transfusions may be indicated for severe thrombocytopenia, bleeding.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is unlikely to be beneficial because eltrombopag is highly bound to plasma proteins.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic patients with a minor inadvertent ingestion can be monitored at home.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with deliberate ingestions that are demonstrating severe hepatotoxicity, an increased platelet count that may produce a thrombolic/thromboembolic event, or evidence of bleeding (rebound effect) should be admitted.
    3) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: All patients with a deliberate ingestion should be evaluated in a healthcare facility and monitored until symptoms resolve. Children with an unintentional ingestion who are symptomatic should be observed in a healthcare facility.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Call a Poison Center for assistance in managing a patient with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is unclear.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) When managing a suspected eltrombopag overdose, the possibility of multi-drug involvement should be considered.
    J) PREDISPOSING CONDITIONS
    1) Patients with a history of Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome may be at greater risk to develop a thromboembolism. Monitor patients with a history of hepatic insufficiency closely for hepatotoxicity following acute exposure.
    K) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Eltrombopag is absorbed with a peak concentration at 2 to 6 hours after oral administration and has an estimated plasma protein binding of greater than 99%. Approximately 31% of an eltrombopag dose is excreted via the kidney; primary excretion is via the feces (59%). The elimination half-life of eltrombopag is approximately 21 to 32 hours in healthy individuals and approximately 26 to 35 hours in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
    L) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Includes other agents that may cause or potentiate the elevation of liver enzymes (e.g., alcohol, acetaminophen) or thrombocytopenia (e.g., antineoplastic agents).

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Limited data. An individual ingested 5000 mg of eltrombopag and had a peak platelet count of 925 x 10(9)/L on day 13 and an increase in liver enzymes. The patient recovered completely with aggressive supportive care.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Varies by indication; INITIAL DOSE: 25 to 50 mg orally once daily. MAINTENANCE DOSE: Increase daily dose by 25 mg or 50 mg every 2 weeks to achieve a target platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of up to 150 mg/day. PEDIATRIC: The safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of severe aplastic anemia and chronic hepatitis C-associated thrombocytopenia have not been established in pediatric patients. Chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: INITIAL DOSE: 50 mg orally once daily; MAINTENANCE DOSE: increase daily dose by 25 mg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of 75 mg/day.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Eltrombopag is used for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have not responded to other therapies. It is only intended for ITP patients at significant risk for bleeding.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist. It is able to interact with the transmembrane domain of the human TPO-receptor and initiates signaling cascades that induce proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes from bone marrow progenitor cells.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive exposure may increase platelet counts and result in thrombotic and/or thromboembolic events.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Eltrombopag is only available through a restricted distribution program due to the risk of hepatotoxicity. At the time of this review, the overall risk of exposure is limited.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) ADVERSE EFFECTS: SERIOUS: Potentially serious events reported with therapy have included: abnormal increase in liver enzymes and bilirubin, thrombotic/thromboembolic complications, and the development of hemorrhage following the discontinuation of therapy. OTHER: Nausea, vomiting, menorrhagia, myalgia, paresthesia, cataract, dyspepsia, ecchymosis, thrombocytopenia and conjunctival hemorrhage have been observed with therapy.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE POISONING: It is anticipated that toxicity is likely an extension of pharmacologic events which may include the development of thrombocytosis, hepatotoxicity, bone marrow reticulin formation and bone marrow fibrosis. Rash, bradycardia, elevated aminotransferase concentrations, and thrombocytosis have been reported after overdose. Hemorrhage may also be observed as a result of rebound thrombocytopenia following the discontinuation of therapy.
    2) SEVERE POISONING: An excessive increase in platelet count may increase the risk of developing a thrombotic and/or thromboembolic events.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Fever may develop with therapeutic use of eltrombopag.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Fever was reported in 7%, 16% and 9% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Cataracts were observed in 3% of patients with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag 50 mg/day (n=106) as compared with 1% in the placebo group (n=67) in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a maximum treatment duration of 6 weeks (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    2) Conjunctival hemorrhage was reported in 2% of patients with chronic ITP received eltrombopag (n=106) as compared with 1% in the placebo group (n=67) in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a maximum treatment duration of 6 weeks (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) An adult developed bradycardia after ingesting 5000 mg eltrobopag and recovered with supportive care (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEADACHE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, phase III study, headache was the most common adverse event (21%) reported in patients (n=76) with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura receiving 50 mg/day eltrombopag (Garnock-Jones & Keam, 2009).
    b) Headache was reported in 36%, 16% and 17% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 17% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. During the subsequent antiviral treatment phase, headache was reported in 21%, 16% and 13% of patients as compared to 0% in the placebo group. This antiviral phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    B) DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Depression was reported in 14%, 5% and 17% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    C) FATIGUE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Fatigue was reported in 29%, 26% and 22% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    D) PARESTHESIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Paresthesia was reported in 3% of patients with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag 50 mg/day (n=106) as compared with 1% of those receiving placebo (n=67) in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a maximum treatment duration of 6 weeks (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    E) FEELING IRRITABLE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Irritability was reported in 14%, 0% and 4% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In placebo-controlled trials, nausea was reported in 6% of patients (n=106) with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag 50 mg/day as compared to 4% of patients in the placebo group (n=67). Vomiting was reported in 4% of eltrombopag-treated patients as compared to 3% of placebo group (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    b) Nausea was reported in 7%, 11% and 4% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. In a subsequent antiviral treatment phase, nausea was reported in 21%, 16%, and 4% of patients compared to 0% in the placebo group. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    B) CONSTIPATION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Constipation was reported in 3% of patients (n=30) receiving 30 mg eltrombopag and 7% of patients (n=28) receiving 75 mg as compared with 7% of patients in the placebo group (n=29) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 117 adults with relapsed or refractory chronic ITP (Bussel et al, 2007).
    C) DIARRHEA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Diarrhea was reported in 4% of patients receiving 75 mg eltrombopag (n=28) as compared with 7% of patients in the placebo group (n=29) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 117 adults with relapsed or refractory chronic ITP (Bussel et al, 2007).
    b) Diarrhea was reported in 0%, 5% and 13% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. The antiviral treatment phase consisted of the concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    D) INDIGESTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) In placebo-controlled trials, dyspepsia was reported in 2% of patients (n=106) with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag 50 mg/day as compared to 0% in the placebo group (n=67) (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    E) UPPER ABDOMINAL PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Upper abdominal pain was reported in 14%, 11% and 0% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    F) APTYALISM
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Dry mouth was reported in 14%, 11% and 9% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis (McHutchison et al, 2007).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TOXIC LIVER DISEASE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Hepatotoxicity may develop with eltrombopag therapy. In controlled trials, the overall rate of serum liver abnormalities was 10% in the eltrombopag group as compared to 8% in the placebo group. Most cases were grade 2 or less in severity. In controlled studies, only 1% of patients discontinued therapy due to hepatobiliary abnormalities (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    b) Elevated liver enzymes levels were reported in 2% of adult patients (median age of 50 years) with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag (n=106), compared with 0% of those receiving placebo (n=67) in 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a maximum treatment duration of 6 weeks (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT - An individual ingested 5000 mg of eltrombopag and had a peak platelet count of 925 x 10(9)/L on day 13 and an increase in liver enzymes. The patient also developed bradycardia, rash and fatigue. Treatment included: gastric lavage, oral lactulose, omeprazole, atropine, furosemide, calcium, dexamethasone, and plasmapheresis. Approximately 3 weeks after ingestion, the platelet count and liver enzymes normalized. No permanent sequelae was observed (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ANEMIA
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Anemia was reported in 14%, 11% and 9% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    B) THROMBOSIS
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Thrombotic complications may occur as a result of an excessive increase in the platelet count from large doses of eltrombopag therapy or inadvertent excessive doses (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT - An individual ingested 5000 mg of eltrombopag and had a peak platelet count of 925 x 10(9)/L on day 13 and an increase in liver enzymes. The patient also developed bradycardia, rash and fatigue. Treatment included: gastric lavage, oral lactulose, omeprazole, atropine, furosemide, calcium, dexamethasone, and plasmapheresis. Approximately 3 weeks after ingestion, the platelet count and liver enzymes normalized. No permanent sequelae was observed (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ITCHING OF SKIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Pruritus was reported in 7%, 11% and 0% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    B) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Rash was reported in 3% of patients (n=30) receiving 30 mg eltrombopag and 7% of patients (n=28) receiving 75 mg as compared with 3% of patients in the placebo group (n=29) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 117 adults with relapsed or refractory chronic ITP (Bussel et al, 2007).
    b) Rash was reported in 0%, 16% and 4% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) JOINT PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Arthralgia was reported in 3% of patients (n=30) receiving 30 mg eltrombopag as compared with 10% of patients in the placebo group (n=29) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 117 adults with relapsed or refractory chronic ITP (Bussel et al, 2007).
    b) Arthralgia was reported in 21%, 5% and 9% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 6% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).
    B) MUSCLE PAIN
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Myalgia was reported in 3% of adult patients with chronic ITP receiving eltrombopag 50 mg/day (n=106) as compared with 1% in the placebo group (n=67) in 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a maximum treatment duration of 6 weeks (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    b) Myalgia was reported in 21%, 11% and 9% of patients receiving eltrombopag 30 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg, respectively as compared to 0% in the placebo group in the 8-week antiviral treatment phase of an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial for thrombocytopenia associated with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. This phase consisted of concomitant use of eltrombopag or placebo with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin (McHutchison et al, 2007).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Eltrombopag has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of eltrombopag use in pregnancy.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) In an embryofetal development study of pregnant rabbits, there was no evidence of teratogenicity when administered eltrombopag orally at doses of 30, 80 and 150 mg/kg/day (0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 times the human exposure, respectively) (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Eltrombopag has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    B) GENERAL
    1) There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of eltrombopag use in pregnancy. Embryolethality and reduced fetal weight were observed at maternally toxic doses in animal reproductive studies. The manufacturer maintains a pregnancy registry to collect information about the effects of eltrombopag use during pregnancy. Health care providers are encouraged to register pregnant patients by calling the registry at 1-888-825-5249 (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: During an early embryonic development study, administration of oral eltrombopag 10 , 20, or 60 mg/kg/day resulted in increased pre- and postimplantation loss and reduced fetal weight at the highest dose. Maternal toxicity was also observed at the highest dose (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    2) RATS: In an embryofetal development study of pregnant rats administered doses of 10, 20 and 60 mg/kg/day (up to 0.8, 2 and 7 times the human exposure, respectively), there was a decrease in fetal weights and a slight increase in the presence of cervical ribs, as well as maternal toxicity at the highest dose. However, there was no evidence of major structural malformations. No adverse effects were noted at doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg/day (up to 0.8 and 2 times the human exposure) (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    3) RATS: In a toxicity study in pregnant rats prenatally and postnatally, there was no evidence of adverse effects on maternal reproduction or offspring development at doses up to 2 times the human clinical exposure. Eltrombopag was detected in the plasma of offspring and increased with maternal doses that were up to 0.8 and 2 times the human exposure (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    4) RABBITS: In an embryofetal development study of pregnant rabbits, there was no evidence of fetotoxicity or embryolethality, when administered eltrombopag orally at doses of 30, 80, or 150 mg/kg/day (up to 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 times the human exposure, respectively) (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) It is not known whether eltrombopag is excreted into human breast milk, and the potential for adverse effects in the nursing infant from exposure to the drug are unknown (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2012).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Eltrombopag did not affect male or female fertility in rats given doses up to 40 mg/kg/day (5 times the human clinical exposure based on AUC) or 20 mg/kg/day (2 times the human clinical exposure based on AUC), respectively (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) At the time of this review, no human data were available to assess the potential carcinogenic activity of eltrombopag.

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Drug levels are not widely available or useful to guide thearpy.
    B) Monitor serial CBC with differential and platelet counts until platelet count has peaked and begun to decline.
    C) Monitor vital signs and liver enzyme concentrations after significant overdose.
    D) Monitor electrolytes and fluid status in patients with significant vomiting.

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with deliberate ingestions that are demonstrating severe hepatotoxicity, an increased platelet count that may produce a thrombolic/thromboembolic event or evidence of bleeding (rebound effect) should be admitted.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic patients with a minor inadvertent ingestion can be monitored at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Call a Poison Center for assistance in managing a patient with severe toxicity or in whom the diagnosis is unclear.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) All patients with a deliberate ingestion should be evaluated in a healthcare facility and monitored until symptoms resolve. Children with an unintentional ingestion who are symptomatic should be observed in a healthcare facility.

Monitoring

    A) Drug levels are not widely available or useful to guide thearpy.
    B) Monitor serial CBC with differential and platelet counts until platelet count has peaked and begun to decline.
    C) Monitor vital signs and liver enzyme concentrations after significant overdose.
    D) Monitor electrolytes and fluid status in patients with significant vomiting.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    B) ANTACIDS
    1) Based on limited experience, oral administration of a metal cation-containing preparation (e.g., calcium, aluminum, or magnesium) may be used to chelate eltrombopag and limit absorption.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Consider activated charcoal or gastric lavage, if recent ingestion and the patient is able to maintain airway or if airway is protected.
    B) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    1) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    C) CHARCOAL DOSE
    1) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    a) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    2) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    a) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    b) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    D) Based on limited experience, oral administration of a metal cation-containing preparation (e.g., antacids containing calcium, aluminum, or magnesium) may be used to chelate eltrombopag and limit absorption (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. There is no known antidote.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Obtain serial CBC with differential and platelet counts. Monitor vital signs and liver enzyme ; repeat as indicated. Monitor electrolytes concentrations after significant overdose, monitor electrolytes and fluid status in patients with significant vomiting.
    C) TOXIC LIVER DISEASE
    1) Monitor liver enzymes (i.e., ALT, AST, and bilirubin) following exposure. Hepatotoxicity has been reported with therapeutic use.
    D) THROMBOEMBOLIC DISORDER
    1) Obtain serial platelet counts until platelet count has clearly peaked and begun to decline. Monitor for thrombotic/thromboembolic events.
    E) BLEEDING
    1) Rebound thrombocytopenia has been observed with the discontinuation of eltrombopag therapy. Monitor CBC and platelet counts. Blood transfusions may be indicated for severe thrombocytopenia, bleeding.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis is unlikely to be beneficial because eltrombopag is highly bound to plasma proteins.

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Limited data. An individual ingested 5000 mg of eltrombopag and had a peak platelet count of 925 x 10(9)/L on day 13 and an increase in liver enzymes. The patient recovered completely with aggressive supportive care.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Varies by indication; INITIAL DOSE: 25 to 50 mg orally once daily. MAINTENANCE DOSE: Increase daily dose by 25 mg or 50 mg every 2 weeks to achieve a target platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of up to 150 mg/day. PEDIATRIC: The safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of severe aplastic anemia and chronic hepatitis C-associated thrombocytopenia have not been established in pediatric patients. Chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: INITIAL DOSE: 50 mg orally once daily; MAINTENANCE DOSE: increase daily dose by 25 mg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of 75 mg/day.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA
    1) Initial dose, 50 mg orally once daily, and increasing the daily dose by 25 mg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of 75 mg/day (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, 2015).
    B) CHRONIC HEPATITIS C-ASSOCIATED THROMBOCYTOPENIA
    1) Initial dose of 25 mg orally once daily, and adjusting by 25 mg increments every 2 weeks to achieve a target platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, up to a MAX dose of 100 mg/day (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, 2015).
    C) SEVERE APLASTIC ANEMIA
    1) Initial dose of 50 mg orally once daily, and adjust by 50 mg increment every 2 weeks to achieve a target platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, up to a MAX dose of 150 mg/day (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, 2015).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA
    1) PATIENTS 1 TO 5 YEARS OLD: Initial dose, 25 mg orally once daily and increasing the daily dose by 25 mg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of 75 mg/day (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, 2015).
    2) PATIENTS 6 YEARS AND OLDER: Initial dose, 50 mg orally once daily, and increasing the daily dose by 25 mg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/L or greater, with a MAX dose of 75 mg/day (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, 2015).
    B) The safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of severe aplastic anemia and chronic hepatitis C-associated thrombocytopenia have not been established in pediatric patients (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2015).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) At the time of this review, a minimum lethal dose has not been established.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CASE REPORT: An individual ingested 5000 mg of eltrombopag and had a peak platelet count of 925 x 10(9)/L on day 13 and an increase in liver enzymes. The patient also developed bradycardia, rash and fatigue. Treatment included: gastric lavage, oral lactulose, omeprazole, atropine, furosemide, calcium, dexamethasone, and plasmapheresis. Approximately 3 weeks after ingestion, the platelet count and liver enzymes normalized. No permanent sequelae was observed (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Eltrombopag is a small-molecule, nonpeptide thrombopoietin (TPO)-receptor agonist which triggers the cascade that induces the proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes from bone marrow progenitor cells in a dose dependent manner for the treatment of chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (Jenkins et al, 2007; Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2008).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Eltrombopag olamine is practically insoluble in aqueous buffer between pH 1 and 7.4 and sparingly soluble in water (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2014).

Molecular Weight

    A) ELTROMBOPAG: 442.5 (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2014)
    B) ELTROMBOPAG OLAMINE: 564.65 (Prod Info PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, 2014)

General Bibliography

    1) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    2) Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, et al: Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(22):2237-2247.
    3) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    4) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    5) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    6) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    7) Garnock-Jones KP & Keam SJ : Eltrombopag. Drugs 2009; 69(5):567-576.
    8) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    9) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    10) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    11) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    12) Jenkins JM, Williams D, Deng Y, et al: Phase 1 clinical study of eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist. Blood 2007; 109(11):4739-4741.
    13) McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Shiffman ML, et al: Eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(22):2227-2236.
    14) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    15) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    16) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, eltrombopag oral tablets. Glaxo Smith Kline, Research Triangle Park,, NC, 2008.
    17) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, eltrombopag oral tablets. GlaxoSmithKline (per FDA), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2012.
    18) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, eltrombopag oral tablets. GlaxoSmithKline (per FDA), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2015.
    19) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, eltrombopag oral tablets. GlaxoSmithKline (per Manufacturer), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2015a.
    20) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, eltrombopag oral tablets. GlaxoSmithKline (per manufacturer), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2014.
    21) Product Information: PROMACTA(R) oral tablets, suspension, eltrombopag oral tablets, suspension. GlaxoSmithKline (per FDA), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2015.
    22) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    23) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    24) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.