MOBILE VIEW  | 

DILTIAZEM

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Diltiazem is a slow calcium channel antagonist that blocks calcium ion influx during depolarization of cardiac and vascular smooth muscle. It decreases peripheral vascular resistance and causes relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle resulting in a decrease of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Specific Substances

    1) CRD-401
    2) Diltiazem hydrochloride
    3) Latiazem hydrochloride
    4) CAS 42399-41-7 (diltiazem)
    5) CAS 33286-22-5 (diltiazem hydrochloride)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C22-H26-N2-O4-S.HCl (diltiazem hydrochloride) (Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011)

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE TABLETS: 30 mg, 60 mg, 90 mg, and 120 mg (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) oral tablets, 2014).
    2) EXTENDED RELEASE CAPSULES: 120 mg, 180 mg, 240 mg, 300 mg, 360 mg, and 420 mg (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).
    3) EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS: 120 mg, 180 mg, 240 mg, 300 mg, 360 mg, and 420 mg (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) LA oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    B) USES
    1) Diltiazem is used for the treatment of hypertension, dysrhythmias, and stable angina (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) LA oral extended-release tablets, 2015; Prod Info diltiazem HCl 0.5% intravenous injection, 2012; Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: For the treatment of hypertension, dysrhythmias, and stable angina.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Binds to and antagonizes L-type calcium channels located on all types of muscle cells resulting in relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and arterial vasodilation as well as decreased force of cardiac contraction and decreased heart rate and conduction.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses cause bradycardia and conduction delays by suppression of the SA and AV nodes. Decreased contractility is less than that caused by verapamil and more than that caused by nifedipine. Vasodilation is less than that seen after nifedipine overdose.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Common overdose, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Minor gastrointestinal effects, headache, and rash are commonly reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Patients may have asymptomatic bradycardia or mild hypotension which may manifest as dizziness, fatigue, and/or lightheadedness.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can have profound bradycardia and dysrhythmias (including complete heart block) and hypotension resulting in cardiogenic shock and end-organ dysfunction including lethargy, syncope, altered mental status, seizures, bowel ischemia, renal failure, metabolic acidosis, acute lung injury, coma, and death. Hyperglycemia generally develops in patients with severe poisoning.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Diltiazem is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Although there have not been any well-controlled studies conducted in pregnant women, animal studies have demonstrated the occurrence of embryo and fetal lethality following administration of doses ranging from 4 to 6 times the upper limit of the dosage range in humans.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, renal function, arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin level in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum diltiazem concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and a few case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    2) HOSPITAL: Because a diltiazem overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who are able to protect their airway or are intubated who have ingested sustained-release formulations; it can limit absorption from possible concretions. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Intubate patients with coma, mental status depression or significant hemodynamic instability.
    E) HYPOTENSION
    1) Treat initially with fluids (insert a central venous or pulmonary artery catheter to guide fluid therapy if hypotension persists). Consider inserting an arterial line in patients with refractory hypotension. Intravenous calcium, vasopressors, high dose insulin/dextrose, and glucagon may all be useful for refractory hypotension. Pacemakers (external or internal), intraaortic balloon pump, and cardiopulmonary bypass have been used in patients refractory to other modalities.
    2) CALCIUM
    a) Intravenous calcium infusions have been shown to be helpful, although response is often short lived. Optimal dosing is not established; start with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion starting with 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) and titrate as needed. Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration. Patients with severe overdose have tolerated significant hypercalcemia (up to twice the upper limit of normal) without developing clinical or ECG evidence of hypercalcemia.
    3) INSULIN
    a) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to titrate insulin infusion. Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued. Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium <2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    4) VASOPRESSORS
    a) Anecdotal reports suggest that epinephrine, vasopressin, metaraminol, or phenylephrine may occasionally be effective in patients who do not respond to dopamine or norepinephrine.
    5) FAT EMULSION
    a) Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and several case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Administer 1.5 mL/kg of 20% lipid emulsion over 2 to 3 minutes as an IV bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min. Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion. If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources. Where possible, lipid resuscitation therapy should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    6) GLUCAGON
    a) DOSE: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon.
    7) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    8) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) There are case reports where a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (inamrinone, enoximone) appeared to improve blood pressure in patients unresponsive to other modalities.
    F) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis is not of value because of the high degree of protein binding and a large volume of distribution.
    G) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: According to the AAPCC guidelines, healthy, asymptomatic adults with a single diltiazem ingestion of 120 mg or less immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, 360 mg or less of a sustained-release formulation, or 540 mg or less extended-release formulation , and 1 mg/kg or less for a child can be monitored at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a health care facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring. According to the AAPCC guidelines, an adult with an inadvertent single ingestion of diltiazem greater than 120 mg immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, greater than 360 mg sustained-release formulation, or greater than 540 mg extended-release formulation, and greater than 1 mg/kg for a child should be referred to a healthcare facility. Patients should be observed for at least 6 hours after ingestion of immediate-release and 12 to 24 hours after ingestion of sustained-release formulations. Patients who develop signs or symptoms of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Any patient with a history of ingestion of sustained release dosage forms or who become symptomatic should be admitted to a monitored setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    H) PITFALLS
    1) Focus on antidote treatment should not be done in lieu of initially following standard ACLS protocols for treatment of bradycardia and hypotension. In severely poisoned patients, treatment should be aggressive, and the treatments and antidotes described above may need to be started simultaneously. Consider co-ingestants with other cardiopulmonary medications such as digoxin since these patients may be on multiple medications.
    I) PHARMACOKINETICS
    1) Diltiazem is well-absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Absolute bioavailability of an immediate-release formulation is approximately 40% compared with intravenous administration; 70% to 80% bound to plasma proteins and volume of distribution ranging from 360 to 391 L. Extensive hepatic metabolism with desacetyldiltiazem as the major metabolite, which is 25% to 50% as active as the parent and present at 10% to 20% of parent serum levels. Only 2% to 4% is excreted unchanged in the urine. Plasma elimination half-life of immediate-release formulations is approximately 3 to 4.5 hours, and 4 to 10 hours for extended-release formulations.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia generally develop within 6 hours after overdose of regular release products. Toxicity can be delayed, especially with overdoses of sustained release preparations. In addition, duration of effect can be quite prolonged following overdose. Crushing or chewing extended release formulations can cause rapid absorption of the entire dose with resultant toxicity.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Ingestion of other cardioactive drugs (especially beta-blockers and digoxin) should be considered in a patient who is bradycardic and hypotensive.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: The following doses are considered to be potentially toxic: an adult with an inadvertent single ingestion of diltiazem greater than 120 mg immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, greater than 360 mg sustained-release formulation, or greater than 540 mg extended-release formulation, and greater than 1 mg/kg for a child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: ANGINA: 30 mg four times daily IR; 120 to 180 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 540 mg XR. HYPERTENSION: 120 to 240 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 540 mg once daily XR.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: For the treatment of hypertension, dysrhythmias, and stable angina.
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: Binds to and antagonizes L-type calcium channels located on all types of muscle cells resulting in relaxation of vascular smooth muscle and arterial vasodilation as well as decreased force of cardiac contraction and decreased heart rate and conduction.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: Excessive doses cause bradycardia and conduction delays by suppression of the SA and AV nodes. Decreased contractility is less than that caused by verapamil and more than that caused by nifedipine. Vasodilation is less than that seen after nifedipine overdose.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Common overdose, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) COMMON: Minor gastrointestinal effects, headache, and rash are commonly reported.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Patients may have asymptomatic bradycardia or mild hypotension which may manifest as dizziness, fatigue, and/or lightheadedness.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Can have profound bradycardia and dysrhythmias (including complete heart block) and hypotension resulting in cardiogenic shock and end-organ dysfunction including lethargy, syncope, altered mental status, seizures, bowel ischemia, renal failure, metabolic acidosis, acute lung injury, coma, and death. Hyperglycemia generally develops in patients with severe poisoning.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) SIGNS/SYMPTOMS: Hypotension is common following significant overdose. Hypotension may be quite severe and unresponsive to pressor agents. Syncopal episodes secondary to impaired perfusion may occur (Durward et al, 2003; Schwab et al, 2002; Cavagnaro et al, 2000; Ramoska et al, 1993) .
    b) INCIDENCE: This is dependent on the severity of ingestion. In one series, 53% of verapamil cases, and 32% to 38% of nifedipine and diltiazem cases had systolic blood pressures below 100 mmHg (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    c) ONSET: Common within 1 to 5 hours postingestion, although delayed onset (more than 24 hours) and prolonged duration of symptoms can occur following sustained-release dosage forms (Morimoto et al, 1999).
    d) DURATION: In one series, 80% of cases were asymptomatic for all cardiovascular effects after 24 hours (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old woman ingested an unknown amount of sustained release diltiazem and subsequently developed lactic acidosis and vasoplegic shock refractory to intensive supportive therapy, including administration of calcium salts, fluids, vasopressors, and insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump. Her plasma diltiazem concentration increased from 2209 ng/mL at hospital admission to 20,856 ng/mL 42 hours post-admission, necessitating initiation of extracorporeal elimination using a molecular-adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). After 2 sessions of MARS, the patient's hemodynamic status significantly improved, allowing complete cessation of vasopressor agents approximately 6 days post-admission. The patient's plasma diltiazem concentration, obtained after the second MARS session, was 6404 ng/mL (Belleflamme et al, 2012).
    B) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Electrophysiologic effects of calcium antagonists vary among verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, and amlodipine. In overdose, all agents can cause rhythm disturbances and conduction defects. Nifedipine, amlodipine, and other dihydropyridines lack the effects of other structural classes of calcium antagonists on AV nodal conduction. Therefore, these agents are more likely to result in reflex tachycardia secondary to diminished perfusion; bradycardia is twice as likely with verapamil and diltiazem. AV block, especially greater than first degree, is predominately a finding with verapamil (Mitchell et al, 1982).
    C) BRADYCARDIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) FINDINGS: Heart rates below 60 beats/min with accompanying hypotension at presentation are common (Durward et al, 2003; Schwab et al, 2002; Snook et al, 2000; Howarth et al, 1994).
    b) INCIDENCE: Ramoska et al (1993) found verapamil and diltiazem equally (29%) and more likely to produce heart rates below 40 to 60 beats/min than nifedipine (14%) (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    c) ONSET: Common within 1 to 5 hours postingestion, although delayed onset (more than 6 hours) can occur following sustained-release dosage forms (Morimoto et al, 1999).
    d) DURATION: Bradycardia for 36 to 52 hours after admission has been reported (Howarth et al, 1994) . In one series, 80% of cases were asymptomatic for all cardiovascular effects after 24 hours (Ramoska et al, 1993). Ingestion of sustained-release products may result in prolonged or delayed effects.
    e) CASE REPORT: Profound drops in heart rate (junctional bradycardia to 27 beats/min) with reduced cardiac function refractory to IV calcium gluconate followed overdose of 5.88 grams diltiazem and ethanol (Ferner et al, 1989).
    D) ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) INCIDENCE: In one series, 28 (55%) verapamil cases experienced first or greater degree AV block compared with 10 (29%) diltiazem and 5 (18%) nifedipine patients (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    b) DURATION: In one series, 80% of cases were asymptomatic for all cardiovascular effects after 24 hours (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    c) CASE REPORT: Complete (third degree) AV block with a junctional escape rhythm and ST depression occurred in a 51-year-old man following a diltiazem overdose ingestion of 9 grams. Shortly after admission the patient became asystolic and required supportive measures that restored junctional rhythm of 60 beats/minute. However, the patient remained in complete heart block with a junctional escape rhythm until he spontaneously returned to regular sinus rhythm 48 hours later (Connolly et al, 1993).
    d) CASE REPORT: An 18-year-old woman intentionally ingested 14.94 grams of diltiazem and developed complete heart block progressing to asystole, and acute renal failure. The patient completely recovered following aggressive supportive care, which included insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump for approximately 36 hours (Williamson & Dunham, 1996).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old man developed first degree heart block with sinus bradycardia following ingestion of 1080 mg slow-release diltiazem in an attempt to self-treat his angina. The patient recovered following supportive treatment (Satchithananda et al, 2000).
    f) CASE REPORT/INFANT: A 9-month-old child developed third-degree AV block after ingesting an unknown amount of 120 mg extended-release diltiazem tablets. Her ventricular rate ranged from 90 to 110 bpm. With supportive care, the patient spontaneously converted to normal sinus rhythm on hospital day 2, and was subsequently discharged approximately 47 hours postingestion (Wills et al, 2010).
    g) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman ingested 1800 mg (thirty 60 mg) diltiazem tablets and 75 mg nitrazepam. Hypotension to 70/40 mmHg was noted for 24 hours before returning to normal. EKG findings included a first degree heart block 12 hours after ingestion, alternating with periods of sinusal deficiency and junctional escapes, without cardiac insufficiency (Rey et al, 1983).
    h) CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old man ingested 5880 mg (ninety-eight 60 mg) diltiazem tablets. He presented with hypotension (55 mmHg systolic) and junctional bradycardia (as low as 27 beats/minute) with nonspecific ST segment changes but without evidence of myocardial infarction.
    1) Gastric lavage recovered 4 tablets; activated charcoal induced vomiting with an additional 46 tablet fragments identified. Blood pressure and heart rate were unresponsive to 2 intravenous injections of 10 mL calcium gluconate; a pacing electrode maintained 100 beats/minute for 10 hours; dopamine was required to maintain blood pressure for 24 hours. Atrial fibrillation was noted at 50 hours after admission, apparently responding to digoxin over the next 24 hours.
    2) The maximum reported diltiazem concentration was 6090 micrograms/liter 7 hours after presentation (4 hours postadmission). An estimated elimination half-life of 8.6 hours for diltiazem was reported (Ferner et al, 1989).
    i) CASE REPORT: A 74-year-old man was admitted after taking 4.8 g (eighty 60 milligram tablets) of diltiazem. At admission he was alert but had hypotension (SBP 50 mmHg), hypothermia (33 degrees C rectal), and complete heart block with a ventricular rate of 40 bpm.
    1) Following spontaneous emesis, activated charcoal was given, and repeated 3 times every 4 hours. Later analysis suggested the repeated doses did not influence elimination. Bradycardia and hypotension were unresponsive to calcium, atropine, isoprenaline, dopamine or saline; despite external pacing at 100 bpm, SBP remained below 60 mmHg, and a pacing wire was placed to maintain 80 bpm.
    2) Over the next 6 to 8 hours, the patient received 6 L of fluids along with dopamine (to 40 mcg/kg/min), calcium, and glucagon. Despite rewarming efforts, he continued hypothermic, SBP remained below 70 mmHg, urine output was less than 10 milliliter/hour, and he developed clinical and radiographic signs of pulmonary edema.
    3) At 10 hours, calcium was discontinued, dopamine reduced to 2.5 mcg/kg/min, and 1 milligram epinephrine bolus followed by 0.2 mcg/kg/min infusion given with prompt response in blood pressure to 130/60 and urine flow to more than 100 milliliter/hour. Pressor agent infusions were maintained for an additional 18 hours. Sinus rhythm returned at 35 hours after overdosing. However, abnormal chest x-rays persisted for 6 to 8 days.
    4) Kinetic analysis suggested the effective absorbed dose was 1000 milligram (4.8 g taken), with a peak plasma diltiazem level in excess of 1000 mcg/L. Elimination half-lives were 12.9 hours for diltiazem and 12.5 to 12.7 hours for its 2 major metabolites (Henderson et al, 1992).
    E) CARDIAC ARREST
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 51-year-old man presented with lethargy, weakness, nausea, and vomiting approximately 6 hours after ingesting 1.8 to 3.6 grams of slow-release diltiazem, as well as paracetamol, aspirin, isosorbide nitrate, and alcohol. On presentation, the patient was mildly hypotensive, but all other examinations were normal. Eighteen hours postingestion, the patient developed generalized seizures and became asystolic. The patient responded to resuscitative measures; however, within 5 minutes, he had a second asystolic cardiac arrest. The patient again responded to resuscitation, including calcium gluconate and epinephrine administration, and attachment of an external pacemaker. He also developed severe metabolic acidosis and acute renal failure, which were successfully treated with sodium bicarbonate infusion and 24 hours of continuous venovenous hemofiltration. The patient's condition continually improved over the next 48 hours, pacing was discontinued, and he was subsequently discharged 8 days postpresentation without sequelae (Isbister, 2002).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old girl experienced multiple asystolic cardiac arrests with atrial standstill, refractory to therapy with high-dose epinephrine and transcutaneous cardiac pacing, after intentionally ingesting 12 grams of sustained-release diltiazem tablets. Following treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and two 4-hour cycles of hemoperfusion, the patient gradually recovered without evidence of neurologic sequelae (Durward et al, 2003).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 74-year-old man accidentally ingested 1500 mg (twenty-five 60 mg) diltiazem tablets, with hypotension and bradycardia unresponsive to atropine. Intubation was required. Asystole occurred and CPR was administered; cardiac pacing was required before the patient stabilized. Serum diltiazem levels at presentation were 4000 nanograms/milliliter (Snover & Bocchino, 1986).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old man developed bradycardia and hypotension (HR 30 beats/min; mean arterial pressure 40 mmHg) after ingesting diltiazem 3600 mg and propranolol 1200 mg. Despite treatment with calcium salts, catecholamines, high-dose insulin, bicarbonate, and atropine, his condition did not improve. Within 1 minute of receiving 150 mL of 20% IFE he developed brady-asystolic arrest, but his pulse returned to normal after 6 minutes of CPR. Despite aggressive supportive care, his condition deteriorated and he died of multisystem organ failure on day 7. Although the exact cause of arrest in this patient is uncertain, several possible causes were suggested: IFE interaction with other resuscitation drugs, a sudden increase in absorption of drug in the GI tract, a brief lack of oxygen in the lipid-laden blood circulating in the coronary vessels contributing to the arrests, fatal ingestions of drugs regardless of therapy (Cole et al, 2014).
    F) MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) An adult took an unknown amount of several calcium channel blockers (eg, diltiazem, nifedipine, verapamil), and developed symptoms similar to an acute myocardial infarction (ie, diaphoresis, weakness and shortness of breath). ECG changes (new left bundle branch block) and a moderate rise in CK level (2820 International Units/L) and a slightly elevated troponin level (0.10 ng/ml; normal less than 0.09) were also reported. Coronary angiography did not suggest MI. He improved with aggressive supportive care, and later the patient admitted to taking an unspecified amount in likely escalating doses of the various CCBs to treat his lifelong history of intermittent SVT (Henrikson & Chandra-Strobos, 2003).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema has been reported following diltiazem overdose (Durward et al, 2003; Humbert et al, 1991).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old girl was admitted following suicidal ingestion of 20 capsules of Cardizem SR(R) 120 mg (2400 mg). Within 2 hours, ARDS was diagnosed (pO2 of 53 despite oxygen therapy; x-ray and Swan-Ganz readings consistent with ARDS). The condition persisted for 4 days, even though all pressors and cardiac pacing was discontinued within 24 hours (Harchelroad, 1992a).
    c) CASE REPORT: Pulmonary edema and cardiomegaly were reported in a 38-year-old man following an intentional overdose ingestion of diltiazem and atenolol of an unknown amount (Snook et al, 2000).
    d) CASE REPORT: Severe pulmonary edema occurred in a 54-year-old man following ingestion of 1080 mg slow-release diltiazem in an attempt to self-treat his angina (Satchithananda et al, 2000).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT (ADULT): Seizures resulted from a 10.8 gram ingestion of diltiazem in a 58-year-old man with a history of idiopathic epilepsy (Malcolm et al, 1986).
    b) CASE REPORT (ADULT): Generalized tonic-clonic seizures were reported in a 51-year-old man approximately 18 hours after ingesting 1.8 to 3.6 grams of slow-release diltiazem, as well as paracetamol, aspirin, isosorbide nitrate, and alcohol (Isbister, 2002).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) NAUSEA
    1) Nausea and vomiting are common (Belson et al, 2000; Morimoto et al, 1999) .
    B) VASCULAR INSUFFICIENCY OF INTESTINE
    1) Bowel necrosis and mesenteric ischemia may occur in the absence of prolonged hypotension (Donovan et al, 1999).
    C) DRUG-INDUCED ILEUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Ileus and pseudoobstruction developed in a 30-year-old man who developed bradycardia, dysrhythmias, hypotension, rhabdomyolysis, and oliguria after ingesting 4.2 grams of diltiazem (Fauville et al, 1995).
    D) GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) A case control study, performed by Kaplan et al (2000), indicated that therapeutic use of calcium channel blockers may be associated with a 2-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding as compared with users of beta-blockers (Kaplan et al, 2000).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Acute renal failure occurred in an 18-year-old woman who developed severe hypotension following an overdose ingestion of 14.94 grams diltiazem. The patient's serum creatinine peaked at 4.3 mg/dL 4 days after ingestion before gradually returning to baseline (Williamson & Dunham, 1996).
    B) OLIGURIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Transient oliguria is associated with prolonged hypotension (Fauville et al, 1995).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Mild metabolic acidosis (pH 7.2 to 7.3) is common in patients with hypotension after diltiazem overdose (Fauville et al, 1995) .
    b) CASE REPORT: Lactic acidosis and vasoplegic shock occurred in a 70-year-old woman who ingested an unknown amount of sustained-release diltiazem. Administration of IV phenylephrine (up to 80 mcg/min) resulted in a decrease in her arterial lactate concentration; however, her plasma diltiazem concentration increased from 2209 ng/mL at admission to 20,856 ng/mL 42 hours post-admission. With 2 sessions of molecular-adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), the patient recovered with a plasma diltiazem concentration of 6404 ng/mL , obtained after the second MARS session (Belleflamme et al, 2012).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) AGRANULOCYTOSIS
    1) CASE SERIES: A single case of agranulocytosis was reported from diltiazem for 65 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (Anon, 1986). A cause-and-effect relationship, however, is difficult to establish.
    B) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: Thrombocytopenia associated with fever and liver enzyme abnormalities was described in a 61-year-old man after receiving diltiazem 60 mg orally 3 times daily for approximately 1 week. Thrombocytopenia resolved within 8 days after withdrawal of diltiazem. A macrophage inhibitory factor test and mast cell degranulation test (in the presence of diltiazem) were both positive (Lahav & Arav, 1989).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Platelet counts fell from 114000/mm(3) to a nadir of 13000/mm(3) within 4 days following intentional overdose of 630 mg diltiazem, recovering to normal within 2 weeks. No coagulopathy, occult bleeding, or bleeding diathesis was identified (Fang & Tsai, 1993).
    C) LEUKOPENIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: White cell counts fell from admission levels of 7700/mm(3) to 3800/mm(3) within 8 days following intentional overdose of 630 mg diltiazem, recovering to normal within 2 weeks (Fang & Tsai, 1993).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ERUPTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Minor skin rashes are reported for most calcium channel agents (Sun et al, 1994).
    B) LYELL'S TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS, SUBEPIDERMAL TYPE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Diltiazem was associated with serious skin reactions from 65 suspected adverse reaction reports, which included exfoliative dermatitis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (Anon, 1986; Odeh, 1997).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TETANY
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man experienced severe generalized muscular spasms, resulting in decreased ventilatory function, within 1 minute of receiving a diltiazem infusion of 20 mg over 2 to 3 minutes. Complete resolution of the tetany and a return of ventilatory function occurred following administration of 10 mL of 10% calcium chloride (Vinson et al, 1999). It is believed that the tetany may have been due to the rapid infusion of the diltiazem.

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity (Levine et al, 2007).
    2) A retrospective analysis, involving the measurement of hyperglycemia in adult patients following overdose ingestions of diltiazem or verapamil, showed an increase in the median peak serum glucose concentrations in those patients who met the composite endpoints measuring the severity of the overdose (ie, in-hospital mortality, necessity of a temporary pacemaker, or vasopressor therapy), as compared with those patients who did not meet the composite endpoints (364 mg/dl vs 145 mg/dl). The median increase in blood glucose was also greater in the patients who met the composite endpoints as compared to those patients who did not (71.2% vs 0%). Based on these results, there appears to be a direct correlation between serum glucose concentrations and the severity of calcium antagonist overdose, and may be useful as a predictor of the severity of the intoxication (Levine et al, 2007).
    3) CASE SERIES: In a series of 15 cases of calcium channel blocker overdose, 4 nondiabetic patients developed hyperglycemia (Howarth et al, 1994).
    B) FINDING OF THYROID FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ONSET: TSH levels were depressed to 0.1 to 0.2 microunits/milliliter with normal T3 uptake and T4 levels within 8 to 16 hours after 2 case reports with diltiazem (Harchelroad, 1992b).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Diltiazem is classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Although there have not been any well-controlled studies conducted in pregnant women, animal studies have demonstrated the occurrence of embryo and fetal lethality following administration of doses ranging from 4 to 6 times the upper limit of the dosage range in humans.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Abnormalities of the skeleton, heart, retina, and tongue have been reported in animal studies, involving mice, rats, and rabbits, following administration of doses ranging from 4 to 6 times (depending on the species) the upper limit of the therapeutic dose in humans (480 mg/day or 8 mg/kg/day for a 60-kg patient) (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Diltiazem is classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) Decreases in early individual pup weights and pup survival, and prolonged delivery were reported during animal studies, involving mice, rats, and rabbits, following administration of doses ranging from 4 to 6 times (depending on the species) the upper limit of the therapeutic dose in humans (480 mg/day or 8 mg/kg/day for a 60-kg patient) (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).
    2) An increased incidence in stillbirths were reported in animal studies following administration of doses 20 times or greater than the human dose (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) direct compression oral tablets, 2010; Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) LA extended-release oral tablets, 2010).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Diltiazem is excreted in human milk (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) direct compression oral tablets, 2010).
    2) Diltiazem is distributed into breast milk in levels similar to that observed in serum. Paired milk and blood samples were drawn 9 times on the fourth day of treatment with diltiazem (60 mg orally four times daily) in a 40-year-old woman 18 days postpartum. The rise and fall in both serum and milk concentrations of diltiazem paralleled one another, with values being nearly identical. Peak milk and plasma concentrations were approximately 250 ng/mL. Pre-dose values were approximately 150 ng/mL. Based upon these values, a liter of breast milk would contain less than 1 mg of drug (Okada et al, 1985).
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) There was no evidence of fertility impairment in rats following oral administration of diltiazem at dosages up to 100 mg/kg/day (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Several case-control analyses have shown that the use of calcium antagonists is NOT associated with a statistically significant increased risk of developing cancer as compared with non-users of calcium antagonists (Cohen et al, 2000; Sorensen et al, 2000; Kanamasa et al, 1999; Braun et al, 1998; Jick et al, 1997).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) A 24-month study in rats and a 21-month study in mice, receiving oral doses up to 100 mg/kg/day and 30 mg/kg/day, respectively, demonstrated no evidence of carcinogenicity (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Genotoxicity

    A) There was no evidence of mutagenicity in vitro in bacteria or in vitro or in vivo in mammalian cell assays (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, renal function, arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin level in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum diltiazem concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium) and renal function .
    2) Monitor serum glucose. Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity (Levine et al, 2007).
    B) ACID/BASE
    1) Monitor venous or arterial blood gases in patients with significant hypotension.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor cardiovascular status to include blood pressure, ECG, and urinary output.
    b) Monitor pulse oximetry or blood gas and chest radiograph in patients with severe toxicity; pulmonary edema may occur.
    c) Monitor mental status; CNS depression due to direct drug effects, cardiovascular disruptions, and coingestion of CNS depressants is common. Seizures are rare but may occur.
    d) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning (Kamijo et al, 2006).

Methods

    A) GC/MS
    1) Post-mortem analysis of diltiazem concentrations in the body fluids and tissues of two patients was conducted using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). With the GC/MS method, the lower limits of detection in body fluids and tissues were 0.01 mg/L and 0.04 mg/kg, respectively (Moriya & Hashimoto, 2004).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who show the following signs of toxicity should be admitted to an intensive care setting (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991):
    1) CARDIOVASCULAR: Hypotension or bradycardia (or tachycardia with nifedipine); heart block; A-V dissociation; asystole; congestive heart failure
    2) RESPIRATORY: Pulmonary edema
    3) GASTROINTESTINAL: Nausea or vomiting
    4) NEUROLOGICAL: Seizures; altered mental status
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) According to the AAPCC guidelines, healthy, asymptomatic adults with a single diltiazem ingestion of 120 mg or less immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, 360 mg or less of a sustained-release formulation, or 540 mg or less extended-release formulation , and 1 mg/kg or less for a child can be monitored at home (Olson et al, 2005).
    B) A retrospective study was conducted of 161 patients who inadvertently ingested double their usual dose of calcium channel blocker or more. Of the 104 patients who ingested double their usual dose, 9 (9%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. Four of these symptomatic patients had ingested less than or equal to the maximum single dose for the drug, and another four had ingested a dose in between the maximum single dose and the maximum daily dose. Of the 57 patients who had ingested more than double their usual daily dose, 8 (14%) developed cardiovascular signs or symptoms. All of these patients had ingested an amount equal to or greater than the maximal daily dose. The toxicity of calcium antagonists following a therapeutic overdose can be highly variable; this could be due to the broad range of therapeutic doses and the pre-existing conditions in these patients. Because of this variability, home management may be difficult; poison centers should be conservative in their evaluation of these cases (Cantrell et al, 2005).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist in cases of severe poisonings or in cases where there is a history of a large exposure.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, those with underlying cardiovascular disease, those taking beta blockers or another cardiodepressant drug, and those with deliberate ingestions should be referred to a health care facility for treatment, evaluation and monitoring.
    B) According to the AAPCC guidelines, an adult with an inadvertent single ingestion of diltiazem greater than 120 mg immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, greater than 360 mg sustained-release formulation, or greater than 540 mg extended-release formulation, and greater than 1 mg/kg for a child should be referred to a healthcare facility (Olson et al, 2005).
    C) Patients with a history of overdose with sustained release preparations should be observed and monitored in an intensive care setting up to 24 hours (Spiller et al, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993).
    D) CHILDREN LESS THAN 6 YEARS OF AGE: Based on 5 retrospective case reviews involving calcium channel blocker ingestions in children less than 6-years-old, patients should be observed in-hospital for 6 hours following ingestion of regular-release medications and for 12 to 24 hours following ingestion of sustained-release formulations (Ranniger & Roche, 2007).

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs frequently. Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    B) In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, renal function, arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    C) Obtain digoxin level in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    D) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    E) Serum diltiazem concentrations are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination is not recommended because of the potential for abrupt deterioration.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Because a diltiazem overdose can be life-threatening, all significant ingestions should receive activated charcoal. Patients with altered mental status should be intubated prior to administration. Gastric lavage should be considered in patients with recent large ingestions if the airway is protected. Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products. Whole bowel irrigation should be considered early for patients who are able to protect their airway or are intubated who have ingested sustained-release formulations. Whole bowel irrigation should NOT be performed in patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
    2) If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Single doses of activated charcoal are recommended. While not proven effective, administration of a second dose should be considered especially in the setting of sustained-release dosage form ingestion or coingestion of drugs or chemicals which could delay gastric emptying or slow intestinal motility (Krenzelok, 1991; Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    2) Multiple doses, beginning 7 hours post ingestion, did not significantly enhance elimination in a 38-year-old woman who had ingested 900 mg of diltiazem (Roberts et al, 1991).
    3) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    4) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    C) GASTRIC LAVAGE
    1) Gastric lavage, followed by administration of activated charcoal, is recommended in patients with significant ingestions. A large bore orogastric tube is preferred due to the large size of some sustained-release dosage forms.
    2) Late gastric lavage may be effective following sustained-release products.
    3) INDICATIONS: Consider gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube (ADULT: 36 to 40 French or 30 English gauge tube {external diameter 12 to 13.3 mm}; CHILD: 24 to 28 French {diameter 7.8 to 9.3 mm}) after a potentially life threatening ingestion if it can be performed soon after ingestion (generally within 60 minutes).
    a) Consider lavage more than 60 minutes after ingestion of sustained-release formulations and substances known to form bezoars or concretions.
    4) PRECAUTIONS:
    a) SEIZURE CONTROL: Is mandatory prior to gastric lavage.
    b) AIRWAY PROTECTION: Place patients in the head down left lateral decubitus position, with suction available. Patients with depressed mental status should be intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube prior to lavage.
    5) LAVAGE FLUID:
    a) Use small aliquots of liquid. Lavage with 200 to 300 milliliters warm tap water (preferably 38 degrees Celsius) or saline per wash (in older children or adults) and 10 milliliters/kilogram body weight of normal saline in young children(Vale et al, 2004) and repeat until lavage return is clear.
    b) The volume of lavage return should approximate amount of fluid given to avoid fluid-electrolyte imbalance.
    c) CAUTION: Water should be avoided in young children because of the risk of electrolyte imbalance and water intoxication. Warm fluids avoid the risk of hypothermia in very young children and the elderly.
    6) COMPLICATIONS:
    a) Complications of gastric lavage have included: aspiration pneumonia, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury to the throat, esophagus, or stomach, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (Vale, 1997). Combative patients may be at greater risk for complications (Caravati et al, 2001).
    b) Gastric lavage can cause significant morbidity; it should NOT be performed routinely in all poisoned patients (Vale, 1997).
    7) CONTRAINDICATIONS:
    a) Loss of airway protective reflexes or decreased level of consciousness if patient is not intubated, following ingestion of corrosive substances, hydrocarbons (high aspiration potential), patients at risk of hemorrhage or gastrointestinal perforation, or trivial or non-toxic ingestion.
    D) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION
    1) Consider whole bowel irrigation following activated charcoal to limit absorption from possible concretions and sustained release products. It should only be performed in patients who can protect their airway or who are intubated. Whole bowel irrigation should not be performed in patients that are hemodynamically unstable. Sustained-release formulations have produced concretions composed of alginate hydrocolloid matrix despite initial lavage (Rankin & Edwards, 1990; Sporer & Manning, 1993; Buckley et al, 1993; Hendren et al, 1989).
    2) Repeat charcoal following whole bowel irrigation since the PEG/electrolyte solution may desorb drug from charcoal. If continued absorption is suspected in a symptomatic patient after these procedures, consider abdominal x-ray (if brand is radiopaque), ultrasound, or gastroscopy.
    3) COMPLICATIONS: Complications were reported in one patient who was given whole bowel irrigation (WBI), and subsequently became hemodynamically unstable, after an overdose ingestion of sustained-release diltiazem (Cumpston et al, 2010).
    a) A 58-year-old man, received activated charcoal and whole bowel irrigation, at 2 L/hour, approximately 3 hours after reportedly ingesting 7.2 g of extended release diltiazem. Prior to WBI administration, the patient was hemodynamically stable. One hour later (4 hours post-ingestion), the patient developed bradycardia (50 bpm) and hypotension (70/40 mmHg), treated with atropine and IV fluids. After 7 hours of WBI (10 hours post-ingestion), the patient developed asystole, resolved with external pacing, and abdominal distension, resulting in cessation of WBI therapy. Despite aggressive supportive therapy, including vasopressors, calcium, and insulin, he continued to deteriorate and subsequently died. Autopsy was consistent with general hypoperfusion of the bowel without clear infarction.
    a) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose.
    1) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
    b) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987).
    c) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract.
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Patients who have asymptomatic bradycardia can be admitted and observed with telemetry. Obtain peripheral intravenous access and an ECG. Mild hypotension may only require treatment with intravenous fluid administration.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Patients with bradycardia and hypotension require standard ACLS treatment. Place a central line and consider placement of an arterial line. Standard first line treatment includes atropine for bradycardia although in a serious poisoning it is rarely effective. High dose insulin and dextrose have been effective in animal studies and multiple case reports in patients with hypotension refractory to other modalities, and should be considered early in patients with significant hypotension. Use intravenous calcium in severe poisonings although in these cases, beneficial effects of calcium infusion may be very minimal or short-lived. Repeat bolus doses or a continuous intravenous infusion are often needed. Standard vasopressors should be administered to maintain blood pressure. Lipid emulsion has been successful in animal studies and a few case reports of patients with hypotension refractory to other therapies. Intravenous glucagon has been used with variable success. In a patient whose hemodynamic status continues to be refractory despite the treatment described above, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered. Treat seizures with IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur.
    B) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs frequently.
    2) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain serial ECGs.
    3) In patients with significant hypotension or bradycardia, monitor serum electrolytes, renal function, arterial or venous blood gas, and urine output.
    4) Monitor serum glucose. Serum glucose concentration correlates directly with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication; patients who develop hyperglycemia are likely to develop more severe cardiovascular manifestations of toxicity (Levine et al, 2007).
    5) Obtain digoxin level in patients who also have access to digoxin.
    6) Monitor cardiac enzymes in patients with chest pain.
    7) Serum drug levels are not readily available and not helpful to guide therapy.
    8) It has been suggested that continuous SvO2 monitoring using a fiber optic pulmonary artery catheter may be useful to monitor tissue oxygenation in cases of refractory hypotension secondary to calcium antagonist poisoning(Kamijo et al, 2006).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) FLUIDS
    a) INDICATION: Loss of systemic vascular resistance requires an increase in circulating volume. Complete response to fluids alone should not be expected, but volume replacement is a necessary component. Administer intravenous 0.9% saline or lactated ringers and place the patient in supine position. Central venous pressure monitoring is suggested to guide fluid therapy.
    b) CAUTIONS: Monitor for signs of pulmonary edema (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    2) CALCIUM
    a) INDICATIONS: Calcium is given to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is non-competitive (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993) but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    b) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985), however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011)
    c) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops(Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994). Calcium dosing should be titrated to hemodynamic response rather than serum calcium concentration alone; central venous or pulmonary artery catheters may be useful to guide therapy. Monitor ECG and ionized calcium concentration (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    d) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    e) HYPERCALCEMIA: Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves within 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects (clinical or ECG) from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    1) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia with levels as high as 19.2 mg/dL (9.9 mg/dL upper limit of normal) secondary to treatment with calcium salts are reported during aggressive therapy (Buckley et al, 1993). Such aggressive treatment with calcium salts may be necessary to reverse conduction defects (Howarth et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia (16.3 mg/dL) occurred following aggressive calcium chloride treatment in a 45-year-old woman following an overdose ingestion of sustained-release diltiazem. There were no ECG manifestations due to the hypercalcemia and the patient recovered uneventfully over the next 4 days (Hantsch et al, 1997).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    g) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Calcium chloride can cause tissue injury following extravasation; administer calcium chloride via central venous catheter. Hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia may also occur following repeat dosing or continuous infusion; monitor serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Nausea, vomiting, flushing, constipation, confusion, and angina have also been reported in patients receiving calcium (DeRoos, 2011).
    3) INSULIN/DEXTROSE
    a) DOSE
    1) Intravenous insulin infusion with supplemental dextrose, and potassium as needed, is recommended in patients with severe or persistent hypotension after a calcium channel blocker overdose (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004).
    2) Administer a bolus of 1 unit/kg of insulin followed by an infusion of 0.1 to 1 units/kg/hr, titrated to a systolic blood pressure of greater than 90 to 100 mmHg (bradycardia may or may not respond). Reassess every 30 minutes to determine the need for higher rates of insulin infusion (Lheureux et al, 2006). In some refractory cases, more aggressive high-dose insulin protocols have been suggested, starting with a 1 unit/kg insulin bolus, followed by a 1 unit/kg/hour continuous infusion. If there is no clinical improvement in the patient, the infusion rate may be increased by 2 units/kg/hour every 10 minutes, up to a maximum of 10 units/kg/hour (Engebretsen et al, 2011).
    3) Administer dextrose bolus to patients with an initial blood glucose of less than 250 mg/dL (adults 25 to 50 mL dextrose 50%, children 0.25 g/kg dextrose 25%). Begin a dextrose infusion of 0.5 g/kg/hr in all patients. Monitor blood glucose every 15 to 30 minutes until consistently 100 to 200 mg/dL for 4 hours, then monitor every hour. Titrate dextrose infusion to maintain blood glucose in the range of 100 to 200 mg/dL. As the patient improves, insulin resistance abates and dextrose requirements will increase. Supplemental dextrose will be needed for at least several hours after the insulin infusion is discontinued
    4) Administer supplemental potassium initially if patient is hypokalemic (serum potassium less than 2.5 mEq/L). Monitor serum potassium every 4 hours and supplement as needed to maintain potassium of 2.5 to 2.8 mEq/L.
    5) Monitor blood pressure, pulse, ECG, mental status, serum glucose and potassium, urine output, and if possible cardiac function by way of echocardiogram/ultrasound, right heart catheter.
    b) CASE REPORTS
    1) GENERAL: Insulin/dextrose infusions were administered to five patients who experienced severe circulatory shock following intentional calcium channel blocker overdose ingestions and who were unresponsive to conventional treatment. Blood pressures normalized within hours after receiving the infusions and all five patients recovered without sequelae. In 3 of the 4 patients, insulin and dextrose were administered as bolus doses, 10 units and 25 grams, respectively, with the subsequent administration of insulin infusion, the dose ranging from 0.1 units/kg/hr to 1 unit/kg/hr, and dextrose (50% w/v) infusion, the dose ranging from 5 grams/hour to 15 grams/hr, via a central venous catheter. Each patient also received other supportive measures and inotropic agents (Yuan et al, 1999).
    2) Insulin infusions, with or without dextrose given concurrently, were administered to several hemodynamically unstable patients following calcium antagonist intoxication who were refractory to conventional therapy. Blood pressures in all patients normalized within hours after receiving the insulin (Agarwal et al, 2012; Hadjipavlou et al, 2011; Azendour et al, 2010; Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007; Greene et al, 2007; Boyer et al, 2002).
    3) One study reviewed 13 case reports where high-dose insulin (10 to 20 units in 6 patients; 1 patient received 1000 units inadvertently; infusion rates 0.1 to 1 unit/kg/hr; duration either a single bolus dose or infusions for 5 to 96 hours) with supplemental dextrose and potassium (HDIDK) were used to treat calcium channel blockers overdose. These patients failed to respond clinically to other therapies. Twelve patients survived. HDIDK therapy was beneficial in seriously intoxicated patients with CCB-induced hypotension, hyperglycemia, and metabolic acidosis. However, this therapy did not consistently reverse bradycardia, heart block and intraventricular conduction delay (Shepherd & Klein-Schwartz, 2005).
    4) VASOPRESSOR AGENTS
    a) INDICATION: Direct acting alpha-agonists mediate vasoconstriction by mechanisms independent of calcium influx and are preferred (Jaeger et al, 1989) although normal vascular response cannot be expected. In case review series, dopamine is the most commonly cited agent, followed by epinephrine, isoproterenol, and norepinephrine (Watling et al, 1992; Erickson et al, 1991).
    b) CASE REPORTS: Two patients developed severe hypotension following calcium antagonist poisoning. Despite administration of fluids and vasopressor agents, hypotension persisted. SvO2 was continuously monitored in both patients, using a fiberoptic pulmonary catheter, in order to detect tissue hypoxia. The SvO2 remained between 71% and 85%, indicating adequate tissue oxygenation, and metabolic acidosis did not occur. Gradually, the hypotension of both patients resolved without more aggressive administration of vasopressor therapy, suggesting that higher infusion rates of vasopressor agents may not be necessary in patients with refractory hypotension, provided that tissue hypoxia can be excluded after volume resuscitation. Continuous SvO2 monitoring, using a fiberoptic pulmonary artery catheter, may be a useful index of tissue oxygenation (Kamijo et al, 2006).
    5) DOPAMINE
    a) DOSE: Begin at 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute progressing in 5 micrograms per kilogram per minute increments as needed (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). If hypotension persists, dopamine may need to be discontinued and a more potent vasoconstrictor (eg, norepinephrine) should be considered (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    b) CAUTION: If ventricular dysrhythmias occur, decrease rate of administration (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004). Extravasation may cause local tissue necrosis, administration through a central venous catheter is preferred (Prod Info dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, 2004).
    6) Case reports have described the use of higher than conventional doses of dopamine (up to 40 to 50 mcg/kg/min) in patients with refractory hypotension after calcium antagonist overdose (Evans & Oram, 1999). Consider high rates of infusion in patients with refractory hypotension.
    7) NOREPINEPHRINE
    a) NOREPINEPHRINE
    1) PREPARATION: 4 milligrams (1 amp) added to 1000 milliliters of diluent provides a concentration of 4 micrograms/milliliter of norepinephrine base. Norepinephrine bitartrate should be mixed in dextrose solutions (dextrose 5% in water, dextrose 5% in saline) since dextrose-containing solutions protect against excessive oxidation and subsequent potency loss. Administration in saline alone is not recommended (Prod Info norepinephrine bitartrate injection, 2005).
    2) DOSE
    a) ADULT: Dose range: 0.1 to 0.5 microgram/kilogram/minute (eg, 70 kg adult 7 to 35 mcg/min); titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    b) CHILD: Dose range: 0.1 to 2 micrograms/kilogram/minute; titrate to maintain adequate blood pressure (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) CAUTION: Extravasation may cause local tissue ischemia, administration by central venous catheter is advised (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    8) EPINEPHRINE
    a) EPINEPHRINE
    1) ADULT
    a) BOLUS DOSE: 1 mg intravenously/intraosseously every 3 to 5 minutes to treat cardiac arrest (Link et al, 2015).
    b) INFUSION: Prepare by adding 1 mg (1 mL of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution) to 250 mL D5W, yielding a concentration of 4 mcg/mL, and infuse this solution IV at a rate of 1 mcg/min to 10 mcg/min (maximum rate) (Lieberman et al, 2010). Used primarily for severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure 70 mm Hg), or anaphylaxis associated with hemodynamic or respiratory compromise, may also be used for symptomatic bradycardia if atropine and transcutaneous pacing are unsuccessful or not immediately available (Peberdy et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: INTRAVENOUS/INTRAOSSEOUS: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.01 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:10,000 (0.1 mg/mL) solution); maximum 1 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 3 to 5 minutes (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sorrentino, 2005). ENDOTRACHEAL: OLDER INFANTS/CHILDREN: 0.1 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution). Maximum 2.5 mg/dose (maximum total dose: 10 mg). May repeat every 3 to 5 minutes (Kleinman et al, 2010; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008). Follow ET administration with saline flush or dilute in isotonic saline (1 to 5 mL) based on the child's size (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    b) INFUSION: Used for the treatment of refractory hypotension, bradycardia, severe anaphylaxis. DOSE: 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min, titrate dose; start at lowest dose needed to reach desired clinical effects. Doses as high as 5 mcg/kg/min may sometimes be necessary. High dose epinephrine infusion may be useful in the setting of beta blocker poisoning (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    3) CAUTION
    a) Extravasation may cause severe local tissue ischemia (Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008); infusion through a central venous catheter is advised.
    b) One-time bolus doses of 1 mg have been used in addition to bolus-infusion regimens (Erickson et al, 1991). Epinephrine 1 mg bolus followed by 0.2 to 0.6 mcg/kg/min improved both SBP and urine flow for 18 hours (Henderson et al, 1992). Infusion rates up to 100 mcg/min have been reported (Anthony et al, 1986).
    c) ANIMAL STUDY: Intravenous epinephrine administration (1 to 2 mcg/kg bolus dose, followed by a maintenance infusion of 8 to 12 mcg/min for 30 minutes) was shown to be effective in significantly improving the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures, as well as improving heart rate and A-V conduction, of anesthetized dogs who were given diltiazem infusions in high concentrations (Dimich et al, 1988).
    9) PHENYLEPHRINE
    a) PHENYLEPHRINE
    1) MILD OR MODERATE HYPOTENSION
    a) INTRAVENOUS: ADULT: Usual dose: 0.2 mg; range: 0.1 mg to 0.5 mg. Maximum initial dose is 0.5 mg. A 0.5 mg IV dose can elevate the blood pressure for approximately 15 min (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011). PEDIATRIC: Usual bolus dose: 5 to 20 mcg/kg IV repeated every 10 to 15 min as needed (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    2) CONTINUOUS INFUSION
    a) PREPARATION: Add 10 mg (1 mL of a 1% solution) to 500 mL of normal saline or dextrose 5% in water to produce a final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.
    b) ADULT DOSE: To raise blood pressure rapidly; start an initial infusion of 100 to 180 mcg/min until blood pressure stabilizes; then reduce infusion to 40 to 60 mcg/min titrated to desired effect. If necessary, additional doses in increments of 10 mg or more may be added to the infusion solution and the rate of flow titrated to the desired effect (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Intravenous infusion should begin at 0.1 to 0.5 mcg/kg/min; titrate to the desired effect (Taketomo et al, 1997).
    3) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) Headache, reflex bradycardia, excitability, restlessness and rarely dysrhythmias may develop (Prod Info phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, 2011).
    10) DOBUTAMINE
    a) DOBUTAMINE
    1) DOSE: ADULT: Infuse at 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV. PEDIATRIC: Infuse at 2 to 20 micrograms/kilogram/minute IV or intraosseous, titrated to desired effect (Peberdy et al, 2010; Kleinman et al, 2010).
    2) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate if ventricular ectopy develops (Prod Info dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, 2012).
    11) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    12) CAUTIONS: Normal vascular response may not be seen. Doses of isoproterenol, while beneficial to cardiac conduction (beta-1 effect), may worsen peripheral vascular resistance (beta-2 effects) (Krenzelok, 1991).
    13) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    14) PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS
    a) INAMRINONE
    1) INAMRINONE
    a) PREPARATION: Dilute solution for infusion to a final concentration of 1 to 3 milligrams per milliliter in normal saline (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ADULT DOSE: Loading dose of 0.75 milligram/kilogram over 2 to 3 minutes followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 to 10 micrograms/kilogram per minute titrate to hemodynamic response. Repeat initial loading dose after 30 minutes if necessary (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: The safety and effectiveness of inamrinone in the pediatric population has not been established (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    d) CAUTIONS: May cause hypotension and dysrhythmias (Prod Info inamrinone intravenous solution, 2002).
    b) ENOXIMONE
    1) VERAPAMIL: After ingesting 2800 mg of atenolol and 1600 mg of verapamil, a 57-year-old man with a history of ischemic heart disease (two previous acute myocardial infarctions) developed hypotension (BP 80/50 mmHg), and bradycardia (40 beats/min). An ECG revealed a sinus bradycardia with a first-degree heart block, previously absent. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, only a modest hemodynamic effect was observed. Following treatment with a bolus of enoximone 1 mg/kg and a continuous infusion at 0.5 mcg/kg/min for 5 days, his hemodynamic status improved. The authors suggested that enoximone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, may be an alternative agent to glucagon as they have an inotropic effect which is not mediated by a beta receptor (Sandroni et al, 2004).
    15) L-CARNITINE
    a) L-carnitine may be useful to treat hypotension in the setting of calcium channel blocker overdose. It is not well studied but an animal study and one human case report suggest efficacy. The dose used in the human case report was 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours.
    b) MECHANISM: Carnitine is synthesized in several human organs, including liver and kidneys. It is produced from amino acids lysine and methionine in 2 optical isomeric forms with only L-carnitine being the biological active isomer. It transports fatty acids from the cellular cytoplasm into the mitochondrial matrix by the carnitine shuttle. The fatty acids undergo beta-oxidation to form acetyl-CoA in the mitochondrial matrix. It then enters the Krebs cycle to produce cellular energy. In one animal study, it was proposed that verapamil toxicity changed the cardiac metabolism from free fatty acids to carbohydrate. It has been suggested that L-carnitine in combination with high-dose insulin can decrease insulin resistance, promote intracellular glucose transport, increase the uptake and hepatic beta-oxidation of fatty acids, and increase calcium channel sensitivity in patients with calcium channel blocker toxicity (Perez et al, 2011; St-Onge et al, 2013).
    c) ANIMAL STUDY: In a controlled, blinded animal study, 16 male rats were anesthetized and received a constant infusion of 5 mg/kg/hr of verapamil to produce severe verapamil toxicity. All animals received a bolus of 50 mg/kg of either L-carnitine or normal saline 5 minutes later. Mean arterial pressures (MAP) and heart rates of animals were recorded at baseline and at 15 and 30 minutes after the start of the experiment. The survival time was evaluated using the length of time (in minutes) from the initiation of verapamil until either the MAP had reached 10% of the baseline values or 150 minutes had passed without a suitable reduction in blood pressure. Animals in the L-carnitine group survived a median time of 140.75 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 98.6 to 150 minutes) as compared with 49.19 minutes (IQR = 39.2 to 70.97 minutes; p=0.0001) in the normal saline group. All animals in the L-carnitine group and one in the saline group survived over 90 minutes. Four animals in the L-carnitine group also survived the 150-minute protocol. At 15 minutes, a higher mean MAP was observed in the carnitine group (63 mm Hg; SD +/- 19.4 mmHg) as compared with the saline group (42.6 mmHg; SD +/_ 22.9 mmHg; p=0.047; a difference of 20.4 mmHg; 95% CI = 0.25 to 40.65 mmHg) (Perez et al, 2011).
    d) AMLODIPINE/METFORMIN OVERDOSE: A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type II diabetes, benign prostate hypertrophy, and chronic anemia, ingested 300 mg of amlodipine, 3500 mg of metformin, and ethanol in a suicide attempt. He presented pale, diaphoretic, and hemodynamically unstable (BP 56/42 mmHg, heart rate 77 beats/min). Laboratory results revealed a blood glucose concentration of 13 mmol/L, serum creatinine of 103 mcmol/L (normal, 50 to 100 mcmol/L), serum sodium of 126 mmol/L, and an increased CK of 871 mmol/L. The arterial blood gas analysis an hour later showed a pH of 7, pCO2 of 42, bicarbonate of 10 mmol/L, and lactate of 14.1 mmol/L (anion-gap of 22). Despite supportive therapy for 10 hours, including calcium, glucagon, vasopressors, high-dose insulin (HDI; even after more than 1 hour of infusion at 320 Units/hr), dextrose, lipid emulsion, and bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis, he remained in refractory shock (BP 110/50 mmHg, norepinephrine running at 80 mcg/min), hyperglycemic (33 mmol/L), oliguric, and acidotic. Continuous renal replacement therapy was not initiated because he was considered too unstable. About 11 hours after presentation, he received L-carnitine 6 g IV followed by 1 g IV every 4 hours. His condition began to improve about 30 minutes after L-carnitine loading dose and his norepinephrine requirement continued to decrease. Vasopressors were discontinued within 36 hours of initial presentation and he was extubated successfully within 4 days of presentation. His serum amlodipine concentration was 83 ng/mL (therapeutic: 3 to 11 ng/mL) on arrival and peaked at 160 ng/mL several hours later. His metformin concentration was 24 mcg/mL (therapeutic: 1 to 2 mcg/mL) at arrival (St-Onge et al, 2013).
    16) METARAMINOL
    a) AMLODIPINE: A 43-year-old man developed hypotension (BP 65/40 mmHg) after ingesting 560 mg of amlodipine. Despite treatment with fluid resuscitation, calcium salts, glucagon and norepinephrine/epinephrine inotropic support, there was no hemodynamic response. Following treatment with metaraminol (a loading bolus of 2 mg [equivalent to 25 mcg/kg] and intravenous infusion of 1 mcg/kg/min [83 mcg/min] for 36 hours), there was improvement in his blood pressure, cardiac output and urine output (Wood et al, 2005).
    17) TERLIPRESSIN
    a) FELODIPINE: A 61-year-old man developed hypotension (75/50 mmHg on admission) after ingesting 140 mg of felodipine. Despite administration of epinephrine and norepinephrine, the patient's hypotension persisted (mean arterial pressure 47 mmHg). A continuous infusion of 0.05 mcg/kg/min of terlipressin, a vasopressor, was initiated, resulting in the mean arterial pressure increasing from 47 to 95 mmHg; systemic vascular resistance and SvO2 also increased (Leone et al, 2005).
    18) VASOPRESSIN
    a) AMLODIPINE AND DILTIAZEM: Two patients were given vasopressin infusions for treatment of refractory hypotension following intentional ingestions of 800 mg amlodipine and 4800 mg sustained-release diltiazem, respectively. The vasopressin infusion, in the first patient, was initiated at a rate of 2.4 international units (IU)/hour and titrated to 4.8 IU/hour over two hours. The second patient received a 20 IU bolus of vasopressin followed by a 4 IU/hour infusion. The hypotension resolved in both patients and they were subsequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (Kanagarajan et al, 2007).
    b) ANIMAL STUDY: In a porcine model, 18 anesthetized swine, each receiving a verapamil infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr until the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased to 70% of baseline, were divided into two groups: one group that received a vasopressin infusion of 0.01 units/kg/min (n=8) and the control group that received an equal volume of normal saline (n=10). MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output were then measured every 5 minutes until t=60 minutes. The results showed that there was no significant difference in MAP, heart rate, and cardiac output between the two groups. Four of 8 animals in the vasopressin group died as compared with 2 of 10 animals in the control group. Death appeared to be related to hypotension and low cardiac output. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that treatment with vasopressin actually decreased the survival of swine following verapamil intoxication as compared to the swine treated with normal saline alone (Barry et al, 2005)
    19) SODIUM BICARBONATE
    a) ANIMAL DATA: In a study involving swine to determine the efficacy of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate in treating hypotension associated with severe verapamil toxicity, it was determined that swine, treated with 4 mEq/kg of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate given intravenously over 4 minutes, experienced a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output as compared with animals in the control group, who were given 0.6% sodium chloride in 10% mannitol (Tanen et al, 2000).
    D) FAT EMULSION
    1) Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been effective in reversing severe cardiovascular toxicity from local anesthetic overdose in animal studies and human case reports. Several animal studies and human case reports have also evaluated the use of ILE for patients following exposure to other drugs. Although the results of these studies are mixed, there is increasing evidence that it can rapidly reverse cardiovascular toxicity and improve mental function for a wide variety of lipid soluble drugs. It may be reasonable to consider ILE in patients with severe symptoms who are failing standard resuscitative measures (Lavonas et al, 2015).
    2) The American College of Medical Toxicology has issued the following guidelines for lipid resuscitation therapy (LRT) in the management of overdose in cases involving a highly lipid soluble xenobiotic where the patient is hemodynamically unstable, unresponsive to standard resuscitation measures (ie, fluid replacement, inotropes and pressors). The decision to use LRT is based on the judgement of the treating physician. When possible, it is recommended these therapies be administered with the consultation of a medical toxicologist (American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016; American College of Medical Toxicology, 2011):
    a) Initial intravenous bolus of 1.5 mL/kg 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid) over 2 to 3 minutes. Asystolic patients or patients with pulseless electrical activity may have a repeat dose, if there is no response to the initial bolus.
    b) Follow with an intravenous infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min of 20% lipid emulsion (eg, Intralipid). Evaluate the patient's response after 3 minutes at this infusion rate. The infusion rate may be decreased to 0.025 mL/kg/min (ie, 1/10 the initial rate) in patients with a significant response. This recommendation has been proposed because of possible adverse effects from very high cumulative rates of lipid infusion. Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic parameters every 15 minutes during the infusion.
    c) If there is an initial response to the bolus followed by the re-emergence of hemodynamic instability during the lowest-dose infusion, the infusion rate may be increased back to 0.25 mL/kg/min or, in severe cases, the bolus could be repeated. A maximum dose of 10 mL/kg has been recommended by some sources.
    d) Where possible, LRT should be terminated after 1 hour or less, if the patient's clinical status permits. In cases where the patient's stability is dependent on continued lipid infusion, longer treatment may be appropriate.
    3) CASE REPORTS
    a) A 57-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with hypotension and bradycardia after a multi-drug overdose ingestion, including an unknown amount of sustained release diltiazem 360 mg. An initial ECG showed sinus bradycardia without evidence of other ECG abnormalities, including AV block , wide QRS, or prolonged QT. The patient was given calcium chloride, glucagon, and vasopressors for persistent hypotension; however, 9 hours later, the patient developed chest pain with ECG changes. Her mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 60 mmHg. Intravenous lipid therapy 20% was initiated with a loading dose of 1.5 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL/kg/min for a total dose of 8 mL/kg. Following completion of therapy, the patient's MAP increased to 68 mmHg, and vasopressor therapy was discontinued within 45 hours. The patient made a complete recovery and was discharged approximately 16 days post-ingestion (Wilson et al, 2012).
    b) An 18-year-old woman presented with hypotension (71/40 mmHg) and tachycardia (102 bpm) approximately 8 hours after ingesting 3600 mg of sustained release diltiazem. Despite administration of fluids, and calcium chloride, the patient's hypotension persisted and she became oliguric. Four hours post-admission, she developed respiratory failure, necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient was also receiving high-dose norepinephrine (6.66 mcg/kg/min), resulting in slight increases in her systolic and mean arterial blood pressures. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy was started with no significant improvement in her hemodynamic status and, 3 hours later, intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) 20% was initiated with a bolus dose of 1.5 mL/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25 mL/kg over 1 hour. Following ILE therapy, the patient's hemodynamic status improved, with discontinuation of norepinephrine on hospital day 4. The patient made a complete recovery and was discharged approximately 9 days post-ingestion (Montiel et al, 2011).
    c) A 53-year-old man developed bradycardia and hypotension (HR 30 beats/min; mean arterial pressure 40 mmHg) after ingesting diltiazem 3600 mg and propranolol 1200 mg. Despite treatment with calcium salts, catecholamines, high-dose insulin, bicarbonate, and atropine, his condition did not improve. Within 1 minute of receiving 150 mL of 20% IFE he developed brady-asystolic arrest, but his pulse returned to normal after 6 minutes of CPR. Despite aggressive supportive care, his condition deteriorated and he died of multisystem organ failure on day 7. Although the exact cause of arrest in this patient is uncertain, several possible causes were suggested: IFE interaction with other resuscitation drugs, a sudden increase in absorption of drug in the GI tract, a brief lack of oxygen in the lipid-laden blood circulating in the coronary vessels contributing to the arrests, fatal ingestions of drugs regardless of therapy (Cole et al, 2014).
    ANIMAL DATA
    d) In a dog model of severe verapamil poisoning, dogs treated with 7 mg/kg 20% intravenous fat emulsion (after atropine and three doses of calcium chloride) had improved mean arterial pressure and 120 minute survival (100% vs 14%) compared with dogs treated with the same doses of atropine and calcium chloride, and 7 mg/kg 0.9% saline (Bania et al, 2007).
    e) In a rat model of lethal verapamil overdose, intralipid treatment prolonged survival (44 +/-21 vs 24 +/- 9 minutes; p=0.003) and doubled median lethal dose (25.7 mg/kg [95% CI = 24.7 to 26.7] vs 13.6 mg/kg [95% CI = 12.2 to 15]). In addition, during verapamil infusion, a less marked decrease in heart rate was noted in the Intralipid-treated group (6.8 bpm [95% CI=8.3 to 5.2] for intralipid vs 10.7 bpm [95% CI = 12.6 to 8.9] for saline; p=0.001) (Tebbutt et al, 2006).

    E) BRADYCARDIA
    1) CALCIUM
    a) INDICATIONS: Calcium is given to reverse hypotension and improve cardiac conduction defects. Calcium administration has been most effective in overcoming mild toxicity from small overdoses or therapeutic use and is less useful in massive overdose cases since calcium channel blockade is non-competitive (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991; Krenzelok, 1991; Clark & Hanna, 1993), but was successful in 11 of 30 cases in one series (Hofer et al, 1993).
    b) DRUG OF CHOICE: In some studies, calcium chloride is thought to produce more predictable increases in extracellular ionized calcium and a greater positive inotropic response (White et al, 1976; Haynes et al, 1985); however, other sources have found no differences in efficacy of calcium chloride and calcium gluconate. Calcium chloride provides 3 times more elemental calcium (13.4 mEq) than calcium gluconate (4.3 mEq) in the commercially available 1 gram ampules (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) ADULT DOSE: Optimal dosing is not established; begin with an initial IV infusion of about 13 to 25 mEq of calcium (10 to 20 mL of 10% calcium chloride or 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) followed by either repeat boluses every 15 to 20 minutes up to 3 to 4 doses or a continuous infusion of 0.5 mEq/kg/hr of calcium (0.2 to 0.4 mL/kg/hr of 10% calcium chloride or 0.6 to 1.2 mL of 10% calcium gluconate) (DeRoos, 2011). Some authors advocate administering 1 gram of calcium salts every 2 to 3 minutes until conduction block is reversed or clinical evidence of hypercalcemia develops(Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    d) HYPERCALCEMIA: Some degree of hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. In patients who have received large doses of calcium for severe calcium channel blocker overdose (attaining serum calcium concentrations up to twice the upper limits of normal), hypercalcemia generally resolves with in 48 hours without clinically apparent adverse effects from hypercalcemia (Howarth et al, 1994; Buckley et al, 1994).
    1) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia with levels as high as 19.2 mg/dL (9.9 mg/dL upper limit of normal) secondary to treatment with calcium salts are reported during aggressive therapy (Buckley et al, 1993). Such aggressive treatment with calcium salts may be necessary to reverse conduction defects (Howarth et al, 1994).
    2) CASE REPORT: Hypercalcemia (16.3 mg/dL) occurred following aggressive calcium chloride treatment in a 45-year-old woman following an overdose ingestion of sustained-release diltiazem. There were no ECG manifestations due to the hypercalcemia and the patient recovered uneventfully over the next 4 days (Hantsch et al, 1997).
    e) CASE SERIES: In one series, doses varied from 4.5 mEq to 95.2 mEq, with no evidence of a dose-response relation (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    f) PRECAUTIONS: Hypotension generally does not respond as well as conduction disturbances to calcium. Significant hypercalcemia may be necessary before severely intoxicated patients respond to aggressive calcium therapy, but the optimal calcium regimen has not been established. If a patient does not respond after a doubling of the ionized calcium concentration, further calcium treatment may not be beneficial. If the patient has also ingested digoxin, avoid administering calcium until after digoxin-specific Fab is administered to prevent worsening digoxin toxicity (DeRoos, 2011).
    g) CASE REPORT/HIGH DOSE ADMINISTRATION: A 40-year-old woman, with chronic renal insufficiency, developed hypotension and bradycardia after ingesting 30 mg of amlodipine. The patient's blood pressure and heart rate normalized following high-dose intravenous administration of calcium chloride, consisting of 4 grams given in the emergency department followed by 1.5 grams every 20 minutes (for a total of 13 grams given over 2 hours) (Hung & Olson, 2007).
    h) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Calcium chloride can cause tissue injury following extravasation; administer calcium chloride via central venous access. Hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia may also occur following repeat dosing or continuous infusion; monitor serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Nausea, vomiting, flushing, constipation, confusion, and angina have also been reported in patients receiving calcium (DeRoos, 2011).
    2) ATROPINE
    a) INDICATION: Bradydysrhythmia contributing to hypotension. May be more effective after calcium administration (Howarth et al, 1994).
    b) ATROPINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT BRADYCARDIA: BOLUS: Give 0.5 milligram IV, repeat every 3 to 5 minutes, if bradycardia persists. Maximum: 3 milligrams (0.04 milligram/kilogram) intravenously is a fully vagolytic dose in most adults. Doses less than 0.5 milligram may cause paradoxical bradycardia in adults (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) PEDIATRIC DOSE: As premedication for emergency intubation in specific situations (eg, giving succinylchoine to facilitate intubation), give 0.02 milligram/kilogram intravenously or intraosseously (0.04 to 0.06 mg/kg via endotracheal tube followed by several positive pressure breaths) repeat once, if needed (de Caen et al, 2015; Kleinman et al, 2010). MAXIMUM SINGLE DOSE: Children: 0.5 milligram; adolescent: 1 mg.
    a) There is no minimum dose (de Caen et al, 2015).
    b) MAXIMUM TOTAL DOSE: Children: 1 milligram; adolescents: 2 milligrams (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    c) Up to 2 mg has been administered without effect (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    d) PRECAUTIONS: Atropine primarily blocks vagal effects at the SA node while calcium antagonists affect AV conduction; marked improvements in rate may not be seen.
    3) GLUCAGON
    a) INDICATIONS: Glucagon exerts chronotropic and inotropic effects and can help reverse hypotension but may not improve heart rate in calcium antagonist intoxication.
    b) DOSES: ADULT: Optimal dosing in calcium antagonist poisoning is not established. Initially, 3 to 5 mg IV, slowly over 1 to 2 minutes; may repeat treatment with a dose of 4 to 10 mg if there is no hemodynamic improvement within 5 minutes. CHILD: 50 mcg/kg; repeat doses may be used due to the short half-life of glucagon (DeRoos, 2011).
    c) Empiric dosing has ranged from single doses of 2 mg (Anthony et al, 1986) to 17 mg (Ramoska et al, 1993). Continuous infusion of up to 5 mg/hr have also been used (Doyon & Roberts, 1993; Takahashi et al, 1993; Mahr et al, 1997; Papadopoulos & O'Neil, 2000).
    4) ISOPROTERENOL
    a) INDICATION: Predominant beta-1 effects stimulate discharge rate at SA node, increase heart rate, and improve contractility (Krenzelok, 1991).
    b) ISOPROTERENOL INDICATIONS
    1) Used for temporary control of hemodynamically significant bradycardia in a patient with a pulse; generally other modalities (atropine, dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, pacing) should be used first because of the tendency to develop ischemia and dysrhythmias with isoproterenol (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ADULT DOSE: Infuse 2 micrograms per minute, gradually titrating to 10 micrograms per minute as needed to desired response (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) CAUTION: Decrease infusion rate or discontinue infusion if ventricular dysrhythmias develop(Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    4) PEDIATRIC DOSE: Not well studied. Initial infusion of 0.1 mcg/kg/min titrated as needed, usual range is 0.1 mcg/kg/min to 1 mcg/kg/min (Prod Info Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, 2013).
    5) PACEMAKER
    a) INDICATION: Consider using a pacemaker device in severely symptomatic patients (Rodgers et al, 1989; Quezado et al, 1991; MacDonald & Alguire, 1992; Bizovi et al, 1998; Sanders et al, 1998).
    6) INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP
    a) CASE REPORT: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was required in addition to pacing in a 17-year-old girl who had taken an unknown quantity of acebutolol 400 mg capsules in addition to 480 mg sustained-release verapamil (Welch et al, 1992). Other successful applications have been reported (Melanson et al, 1993; Williamson & Dunham, 1996).
    7) CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
    a) CASE REPORT: Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in a 25-month-old child after verapamil overdose. Serum verapamil levels fell during the procedure, allowing successful pacing, but rose again after discontinuation of the procedure, and he subsequently died (Hendren et al, 1989).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old man ingested 4800 to 6400 mg of verapamil in a suicide attempt and developed cardiac arrest. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass was required 2.5 hours after cardiac arrest. Complete recovery was reported 6 months after exposure (Holzer et al, 1999).
    F) EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION
    1) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old girl experienced multiple asystolic cardiac arrests with atrial standstill, refractory to therapy with high-dose epinephrine and transcutaneous cardiac pacing, after intentionally ingesting 12 grams of sustained-release diltiazem tablets. The patient's hemodynamic status significantly improved, with a return of brainstem reflexes, following a 48-hour period of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Durward et al, 2003).
    G) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    H) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    8) PARTIAL LIQUID VENTILATION
    a) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man, who ingested approximately 24 grams of sustained-release verapamil and subsequently developed hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation, was enrolled in a phase II clinical trial and was given partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with Perflubron(R), a fluorocarbon, administered intratracheally every 2 hours for 4 days. The patient's pulmonary function significantly improved within hours of PLV administration (Szekely et al, 1999).
    1) Theoretically, the dense fluorocarbon improves ventilation: perfusion by redistribution of blood to the anterior portions of the lungs, eases pulmonary toilet (aids in the removal of exudate), and reduces potential further lung injury secondary to lower ventilator settings.
    I) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) 4-AMINOPYRIDINE
    a) SUMMARY: Preliminary investigation suggests that 4-aminopyridine (a potassium channel inhibitor) may antagonize the effects of calcium channel blockers by facilitating inward calcium movement (Pearigen & Benowitz, 1991).
    1) Additional clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of 4-aminopyridine for treatment of calcium antagonist overdose.
    2) HUMAN/CASE REPORTS
    a) Equivocal benefits were reported following 10 mg of 4-aminopyridine in a 67-year-old man poisoned with verapamil (ter Wee et al, 1985).
    b) A 47-year-old woman intentionally ingested 20 1-mg tablets of lorazepam and 40 5-mg tablets of amlodipine and presented to the emergency department 7 hours later with a blood pressure of 124/65 mmHg and a heart rate of 75 bpm. Despite activated charcoal administration, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate continued to decrease to 90/38 mmHg and 58 bpm, respectively. Following intravenous administration of 4-aminopyridine at a dosage regimen of 50 mcg/kg/hour over a 3-hour period, her blood pressure increased to 110/50 mmHg and her heart rate increased to 68 bpm (Wilffert et al, 2007).
    3) ANIMAL DATA
    a) The effectiveness of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and Bay K 8644 (calcium channel activator) were evaluated in verapamil-poisoned Wistar rats. Both agents were able to increase survival time with 70% of the animals surviving in the 4-AP-treated group and 50% surviving in the Bay K 8644-treated group. Average survival in the control groups was 20% for the calcium group and 40% for the adrenaline group, respectively.
    b) MECHANISM: 4-AP has an indirect effect on calcium channels and is able to block potassium K(1) channels on the cytoplasm side leading to depolarization and opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels resulting in improved blood pressure and heart rate. Bay K 644 evokes the release of calcium from endoplasmic reticulum and activation of the calcium ion influx to improve the contraction of the vascular smooth muscle and myocardium and electrical conduction in the heart.
    c) The authors concluded that despite its dose-dependent epileptogenic action (easily controlled in this study with antiepileptic therapy), 4-AP was the most effective therapy (Magdalan, 2003).
    d) 4-Aminopyridine reversed verapamil toxicity in artificially ventilated cats (Agoston et al, 1984).
    2) LEVOSIMENDAN
    a) CASE REPORTS: Two patients who overdosed on calcium antagonists and developed cardiovascular collapse, unresponsive to conventional therapies, improved and then recovered without sequelae following levosimendan infusions (Varpula et al, 2009).
    1) The first patient, a 47-year-old woman, became severely hypotensive and developed asystole, that required ventricular pacing, after ingesting 16 grams of verapamil. Despite calcium, glucagon, epinephrine boluses, norepinephrine, continuous vasopressin infusion, insulin and glucose infusion, intra aortic balloon pump, her mean arterial pressure (MAP) could not be maintained above 50 mmHg. Levosimendan was then initiated at an initial loading dose of 2 mcg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.2 mcg/kg/hour that was continued for 30 hours. Within 2 hours of initiating levosimendan, MAP could be maintained at 60 mmHg without epinephrine boluses, and she eventually recovered with normal neurologic function.
    2) The second patient, a 38-year-old man, became comatose and acidotic, with an unmeasurable mean arterial pressure (MAP), after ingesting 630 mg amlodipine, 300 mg of zopiclone, and an unknown amount of citalopram and acetaminophen. Despite conventional treatment with glucagon, calcium, vasopressors, and insulin and glucose, the patient's condition deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, worsening acidosis, right ventricular dilation, and a left ventricle ejection fraction (LEVF) of 38%. Levosimendan was then initiated at an infusion rate of 0.1 to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Ninety minutes after initiation of therapy, the patient's LVEF improved to 72%. The patient gradually recovered and was discharged approximately 11 days post-ingestion.
    b) ANIMAL DATA: The efficacy of levosimendan, an inotropic agent, on cardiac output, blood pressure, and heart rate was assessed in rats following intoxication with verapamil, infused at 6 mg/kg/hr until mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 50% of baseline, then the infusion was reduced to 4 mg/kg/hr. There were 5 treatment groups evaluated: normal saline infusion (control), calcium chloride as a loading dose and infusion, levosimendan 24 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.6 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-24), levosimendan 6 mcg/kg loading dose and 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion (Levo-6), and levosimendan 0.4 mcg/kg/min infusion with calcium chloride loading dose and infusion (Levo + CaCl2). The results showed that although the Levo-6 and Levo-24 groups showed statistically significant improvement in blood pressure compared to the control group (p <0.05) from t=20 minutes, the rats continued to be hypotensive with no improvement in blood pressure from that observed at t=0 minutes (peak verapamil toxicity prior to treatment administration). Cardiac output was significantly higher in all treatment groups as compared with the control group from t=20 minutes, except for Levo-6, which showed a significant improvement from t=30 minutes, and heart rate was maintained at pre-toxicity levels in all treatment groups. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that further investigation is warranted in order to consider levosimendan as an effective agent for the treatment of verapamil poisoning (Graudins et al, 2008).
    3) METHYLENE BLUE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old woman presented to the emergency department 1 hour after intentionally ingesting 40 10-mg amlodipine tablets. Vital signs indicated normal blood pressure (120/86 mmHg), but elevated pulse rate (110 bpm), and an ECG revealed sinus tachycardia. Approximately 2 to 3 hours after receiving activated charcoal, the patient became hypotensive (75/40 mmHg) and her pulse rate increased to 120 bpm. Despite supportive treatment with calcium gluconate, glucagon, vasopressors, and high dose insulin therapy, the patient's condition progressively worsened, resulting in shock. Approximately 16 hours post-ingestion, methylene blue was administered at 2 mg/kg over 20 minutes, followed by 1 mg/kg/hour infusion. One hour after initiating therapy, the patient's blood pressure increased to 90/75 mmHg and her pulse rate decreased to 90 bpm. The patient was gradually weaned off all vasopressors and high-dose insulin therapy, and methylene blue therapy was discontinued. She was discharged 6 days later without sequelae (Jang et al, 2011).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Hemodialysis is unlikely to be effective because of the high degree of protein binding of diltiazem and large volume of distribution. Case reports suggest that hemoperfusion, or albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS), both of which can remove protein bound drugs, might be effective in severe overdose, but definitive evidence is lacking.
    B) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) In general, the large volumes of distribution and high protein binding of all calcium channel blocking agents would suggest hemodialysis or hemoperfusion would have limited usefulness in removal of significant quantities of these drugs.
    2) Hemoperfusion for three hours 35 minutes resulted in a prominent decrease in both plasma diltiazem and metoprolol serum concentrations.
    a) The 49-year-old woman had ingested 1200 mg diltiazem, 500 mg metoprolol and an undetermined amount of ethanol. The patient improved clinically while on hemoperfusion with less need for cardiac pacing and pressor agents (Anthony et al, 1986).
    C) ALBUMIN DIALYSIS
    1) CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old woman with refractory shock after ingestion of sustained release diltiazem (8.4 grams) was treated with albumin dialysis using the molecular adsorbents recirculating system (MARS). During the procedure, blood lactate levels declined, and vasopressors were tapered and then discontinued 6 hour after albumin dialysis was initiated (Pichon et al, 2006).
    2) Albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy was performed on 3 patients (a 55-year-old woman, a 13-year-old girl, and a 43-year-old man) who developed refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after ingesting 8.4 g sustained-release diltiazem, 4.2 g sustained-release diltiazem, and 14.4 g slow-release verapamil, respectively. Serum diltiazem concentrations in the 55-year-old and the 13-year-old were 2,658 mcg/L and 8,580 mcg/L, respectively, and the serum verapamil concentration was 2,200 mcg/L. Following dialysis, serum calcium antagonist concentrations decreased significantly in all three patients, with full recovery of myocardial function and normalization of renal function (Pichon et al, 2011).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old woman ingested an unknown amount of sustained release diltiazem and subsequently developed lactic acidosis and vasoplegic shock refractory to intensive supportive therapy, including administration of calcium salts, fluids, vasopressors, insulin/dextrose infusion, and insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump. Her plasma diltiazem concentration increased from 2209 ng/mL at hospital admission to 20,856 ng/mL 42 hours post-admission and Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy was initiated. During the first 8 hours MARS session, vasopressor doses could be reduced and plasma diltiazem concentration decreased to 8285 ng/mL with a half life of 7.3 hours during MARS. Plasma diltiazem concentration increased to 17170, and a second 8 hour MARS treatment was performed, during which vasopressors were further decreased and diltiazem concentration decreased to 6404 ng/mL with a half life of 9.4 hours during MARS. Vasoactive drugs were discontinued on the 6th day and the patient made a complete recovery (Belleflamme et al, 2012).

Case Reports

    A) A 54-year-old man ingested 5880 mg (ninety-eight 60 mg) diltiazem tablets. He presented with hypotension (55 mmHg systolic) and junctional bradycardia (as low as 27 beats/minute) with nonspecific ST segment changes but without evidence of myocardial infarction.
    1) Gastric lavage recovered 4 tablets; activated charcoal induced vomiting with an additional 46 tablet fragments identified. Blood pressure and heart rate were unresponsive to 2 intravenous injections of 10 mL calcium gluconate; a pacing electrode maintained 100 beats/minute for 10 hours; dopamine was required to maintain blood pressure for 24 hours. Atrial fibrillation was noted at 50 hours after admission, apparently responding to digoxin over the next 24 hours.
    2) The maximum reported diltiazem concentration was 6090 micrograms/liter 7 hours after presentation (4 hours postadmission). An estimated elimination half-life of 8.6 hours for diltiazem was reported (Ferner et al, 1989).
    B) A 74-year-old man was admitted after taking 4.8 g (eighty 60 milligram tablets) of diltiazem. At admission he was alert but had hypotension (SBP 50 mmHg), hypothermia (33 degrees C rectal), and complete heart block with a ventricular rate of 40 bpm.
    1) Following spontaneous emesis, activated charcoal was given, and repeated 3 times every 4 hours. Later analysis suggested the repeated doses did not influence elimination. Bradycardia and hypotension were unresponsive to calcium, atropine, isoprenaline, dopamine or saline; despite external pacing at 100 bpm, SBP remained below 60 mmHg, and a pacing wire was placed to maintain 80 bpm.
    2) Over the next 6 to 8 hours, the patient received 6 L of fluids along with dopamine (to 40 mcg/kg/min), calcium, and glucagon. Despite rewarming efforts, he continued hypothermic, SBP remained below 70 mmHg, urine output was less than 10 milliliter/hour, and he developed clinical and radiographic signs of pulmonary edema.
    3) At 10 hours, calcium was discontinued, dopamine reduced to 2.5 mcg/kg/min, and 1 milligram epinephrine bolus followed by 0.2 mcg/kg/min infusion given with prompt response in blood pressure to 130/60 and urine flow to more than 100 milliliter/hour. Pressor agent infusions were maintained for an additional 18 hours. Sinus rhythm returned at 35 hours after overdosing. However, abnormal chest x-rays persisted for 6 to 8 days.
    4) Kinetic analysis suggested the effective absorbed dose was 1000 milligram (4.8 g taken), with a peak plasma diltiazem level in excess of 1000 mcg/L. Elimination half-lives were 12.9 hours for diltiazem and 12.5 to 12.7 hours for its 2 major metabolites (Henderson et al, 1992).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: The following doses are considered to be potentially toxic: an adult with an inadvertent single ingestion of diltiazem greater than 120 mg immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, greater than 360 mg sustained-release formulation, or greater than 540 mg extended-release formulation, and greater than 1 mg/kg for a child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: ANGINA: 30 mg four times daily IR; 120 to 180 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 540 mg XR. HYPERTENSION: 120 to 240 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 540 mg once daily XR.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) ATRIAL DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) IV BOLUS: 0.25 mg/kg administered over 2 minutes; if inadequate response, may give a second bolus dose of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes (Prod Info diltiazem HCl 0.5% intravenous injection, 2012).
    2) IV CONTINUOUS INFUSION: Initially, 5 to 10 mg/hour, increased in 5 mg/hour increments up to 15 mg/hour maintained for up to 24 hours (Prod Info diltiazem HCl 0.5% intravenous injection, 2012).
    B) CHRONIC STABLE ANGINA
    1) IMMEDIATE RELEASE TABLETS: Initially, 30 mg orally four times daily; usual dose 180 to 360 mg daily, MAX 360 mg daily (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) oral tablets, 2014).
    2) EXTENDED RELEASE CAPSULES: Initially, 120 to 180 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 480 mg (Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011) to 540 mg (Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011).
    3) EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS: Initially, 180 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 360 mg once daily (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) LA oral extended-release tablets, 2015).
    C) HYPERTENSION
    1) EXTENDED RELEASE: Initially, 120 to 240 mg once daily, up to a MAX of 540 mg once daily (Prod Info CARDIZEM(R) LA oral extended-release tablets, 2015; Prod Info Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, 2011; Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) HYPERTENSION
    1) Initial, 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/day orally in three to four divided doses (immediate-release formulation). May increase up to a maximum of 6 mg/kg/day, not to exceed 360 mg/day (Flynn & Pasko, 2000).
    2) In children who can swallow intact tablets or capsules, sustained-release diltiazem is appropriate at once or twice daily dosing intervals (Sahney, 2006; Flynn & Pasko, 2000).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY: Six deaths have been reported to the manufacturer but are unpublished. In five cases, the amount ingested is not reported, but in the remaining case an estimated 0.7 to 2.88 g was taken (Erickson et al, 1991).
    B) A 60-year-old man died approximately 20 hours after ingesting 8 g of slow-release diltiazem (Romano et al, 2002).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) Patients with the following inadvertent single substance ingestions are considered to have the potential to develop toxicity and should be referred to a healthcare facility: (Olson et al, 2005):
    a) An adult with an inadvertent single ingestion of diltiazem greater than 120 mg immediate-release or a chewed sustained-release formulation, greater than 360 mg sustained-release formulation, or greater than 540 mg extended-release formulation, and greater than 1 mg/kg for a child.
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) SUMMARY Survival has been reported following oral ingestions of as much as 12 g (Durward et al, 2003; Connolly et al, 1993; Erickson et al, 1991) .
    2) CASE SERIES: In a retrospective study of 34 cases of diltiazem ingestion, the largest dose not causing symptoms was 480 mg, while the smallest dose causing toxicity (hypotension, bradycardia) was 420 mg in a 14-year-old girl (Ramoska et al, 1993).
    3) A 16-year-old girl survived an intentional ingestion of 12 g of sustained-release diltiazem (Cardura CD). Her clinical course was complicated by cardiac arrest requiring direct cardiac massage for over 23 minutes, hemodynamic instability, absence of brainstem reflexes for approximately 30 hours. Following intensive care for over 15 days including charcoal hemoperfusion, she made a complete hemodynamic and neurological recovery (Durward et al, 2003).
    4) A 51-year-old man experienced cardiac arrest approximately 18 hours after ingesting 1.8 to 3.6 g of slow-release diltiazem, as well as paracetamol, aspirin, isosorbide nitrate, and alcohol. The patient responded to resuscitative measures, including calcium gluconate and epinephrine administration, and attachment of an external pacemaker. The patient's condition continually improved over the next 48 hours, pacing was discontinued, and he was subsequently discharged eight days post-presentation without sequelae (Isbister, 2002).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) TOXIC drug levels associated with recovery have ranged from 114 nanograms/milliliter (time since ingestion of 12 grams not recorded) to 6090 nanograms/milliliter (4 hours after admission following 5880 mg ingestion) (Ferner et al, 1989; Connolly et al, 1993; Roper et al, 1993; Roper, 1994; Satchithananda et al, 2000).
    2) LETHAL levels have ranged from 0.27 nanograms/milliliter (coingestants included doxepin and carbamazepine) to 4600 nanograms/milliliter (tolazamide and ethanol coingestants) and 61000 nanograms/milliliter with neither dose nor time of level noted (Erickson et al, 1991; Roper, 1994).
    3) CASE SERIES: At autopsy, blood concentrations of diltiazem ranged from 1500 to 8000 nanograms/milliliter in 4 cases (Roper et al, 1993).
    4) CASE REPORT: The serum concentration of diltiazem, 16.5 hours following an overdose ingestion of 7.2 grams slow-release diltiazem, was 3,171 nanograms/milliliter (Luomanmaki et al, 1997).
    5) POSTMORTEM REDISTRIBUTION: Diltiazem appears to undergo postmortem redistribution.
    a) In two patients who died while taking therapeutic doses of diltiazem, the diltiazem concentrations in the lungs and pulmonary vessel blood were significantly higher than in the right femoral venous blood (Case 1: 4.33 to 5.73 mg/kg and 1.89 to 2.12 mg/L, respectively, vs. 0.070 mg/L; Case 2: 3.39 to 3.51 mg/kg and 1.04 to 1.42 mg/L, respectively, vs 0.460 mg/L). This suggests that diltiazem accumulated in the lungs and then was rapidly redistributed into the pulmonary venous blood before distribution into the cardiac chambers (Moriya & Hashimoto, 2004).
    6) CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old man died approximately 20 hours after intentionally ingesting 8 grams of slow-release diltiazem. Postmortem diltiazem and desacetyl-diltiazem concentrations in the patient's tissue and biological fluids were as follows (Romano et al, 2002):
    Sample Diltiazem Desacetyl-diltiazem
    Blood (mg/mL) 31 9.7
    Brain (mg/g) 33.1 13.7
    Lung (mg/g) 179.5 47.5
    Heart (mg/g) 41.8 10
    Liver (mg/g) 182 47.3
    Kidney (mg/g) 49.2 22.6
    Bile (mg/mL) 294.9 29.4

    7) CASE REPORTS: Two patients (a 55-year-old woman and a 13-year-old girl) developed refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure after intentionally ingesting 8.4 g and 4.2 g sustained-release diltiazem, respectively. Serum diltiazem concentrations were 2,658 mcg/L and 8,580 mcg/L, respectively. Following treatment with albumin dialysis with Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) therapy, serum diltiazem concentrations decreased significantly in both patients, with full recovery of myocardial function and normalization of renal function (Pichon et al, 2011).
    8) CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old woman ingested an unknown amount of sustained release diltiazem and subsequently developed lactic acidosis and vasoplegic shock refractory to intensive supportive therapy, including administration of calcium salts, fluids, vasopressors, and insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump. Her plasma diltiazem concentration increased from 2209 ng/mL at hospital admission to 20,856 ng/mL 42 hours post-admission, necessitating initiation of extracorporeal elimination using a molecular-adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). After 2 sessions of MARS, the patient's hemodynamic status significantly improved, resulting in complete cessation of vasopressor agents approximately 6 days post-admission. The patient's plasma diltiazem concentration, obtained after the second MARS session, was 6404 ng/mL (Belleflamme et al, 2012).

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Diltiazem, a benzothiazepine derivative, is a calcium antagonist which interferes with the influx of extracellular calcium through "slow" channels located in the cell membrane of cardiac smooth muscle. At slightly higher doses than those used clinically, diltiazem also inhibits the influx of sodium through "fast" channels. Diltiazem also speeds the exit of calcium from the cell by stimulating adenosine triphosphate-dependent calcium pumps and sodium-potassium pumps (Sato et al, 1971; Nagao et al, 1972).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS
    1) Cardiovascular effects that occur in overdose, as related to the specific class of calcium channel blockers, are as follows (Verbrugge & vanWezel, 2007):
    a) Vasodilation - Dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine) > phenylalkalamines (e.g., verapamil) > benzothiazepines (e.g., diltiazem)
    b) Chronotropic suppression (SA node) - Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    c) Suppression of conduction (AV node) - Phenylalkalamines = benzothiazepines >>>dihydropyridines
    d) Inotropy (contractility) - Phenylalkalamines >>benzothiazepines>dihydropyridines
    B) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) Calcium channel antagonists, in general, decrease pancreatic insulin secretion and induce systemic insulin resistance, resulting in hyperglycemia (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004).
    C) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
    1) Decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance, and poor tissue perfusion and substrate delivery may be related to the occurrence of metabolic acidosis associated with calcium channel blocker (CCB) poisoning (DeWitt & Waksman, 2004). Another contributing factor may be the CCBs interference with glucose catabolism via inhibition of calcium-stimulated mitochondrial activity, thereby leading to lactate production and ATP hydrolysis.

Physical Characteristics

    A) Diltiazem hydrochloride is a white to off-white crystalline powder that is soluble in water, methanol, and chloroform (Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011).

Molecular Weight

    A) 450.98 (diltiazem hydrochloride) (Prod Info DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, 2011)

General Bibliography

    1) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    2) Agarwal A, Yu SW, Rehman A, et al: Hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker overdose: a case report. Tex Heart Inst J 2012; 39(4):575-578.
    3) Agoston S, Maestrone E, & van Hezik EJ: Effective treatment of verapamil intoxication with 4-aminopyridine in the cat. J Clin Invest 1984; 73:1291-1296.
    4) American College of Medical Toxicology : ACMT Position Statement: Interim Guidance for the Use of Lipid Resuscitation Therapy. J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(1):81-82.
    5) American College of Medical Toxicology: ACMT position statement: guidance for the use of intravenous lipid emulsion. J Med Toxicol 2016; Epub:Epub-.
    6) Anon: Annual Review of Yellow Cards - 1985. Br Med J 1986; 293:688.
    7) Anthony T, Jastremski M, & Elliot W: Charcoal hemoperfusion for the treatment of a combined diltiazem and metoprolol overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1344-1348.
    8) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    9) Azendour H , Belyamani L , Atmani M , et al: Severe amlodipine intoxication treated by hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy. J Emerg Med 2010; 38(1):33-35.
    10) Bania TC, Chu J, Perez E, et al: Hemodynamic effects of intravenous fat emulsion in an animal model of severe verapamil toxicity resuscitated with atropine, calcium, and saline. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14(2):105-111.
    11) Barry JD, Durkovich D, Cantrell L, et al: Vasopressin treatment of verapamil toxicity in the porcine model. J Med Toxicol 2005; 1(1):3-10.
    12) Belleflamme M, Hantson P, Gougnard T, et al: Survival despite extremely high plasma diltiazem level in a case of acute poisoning treated by the molecular-adsorbent recirculating system. Eur J Emerg Med 2012; 19(1):59-61.
    13) Belson MG, Gorman SE, & Sullivan K: Calcium channel blocker ingestions in children. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18:581-586.
    14) Bizovi K, Stork C, & Joyce D: Pacemaker use in critically ill calcium channel blocker overdoses (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36:509.
    15) Boyer EW, Duic PA, & Evans A: Hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker poisoning. Ped Emerg Care 2002; 18:36-37.
    16) Braun S, Boyko V, & Behar S: Calcium channel blocking agents and risk of cancer in patients with coronary heart disease. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:804-808.
    17) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    18) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    19) Buckley N, Dawson AH, & Howarth D: Slow-release verapamil poisoning: use of polyethylene glycol whole-bowel lavage and high-dose calcium. Med J Aust 1993; 158:202-204.
    20) Buckley NA, Whyte IM, & Dawson AH: Overdose with calcium channel blockers (letter). Br Med J 1994; 308:1639.
    21) Cantrell FL, Clark RF, & Manoguerra AS: Determining triage guidelines for unintentional overdoses with calcium channel antagonists. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):849-853.
    22) Caravati EM, Knight HH, & Linscott MS: Esophageal laceration and charcoal mediastinum complicating gastric lavage. J Emerg Med 2001; 20:273-276.
    23) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    24) Cavagnaro F, Aglony M, & Rios JC: A suicide attempt with an oral calcium channel blocker. Vet Human Toxicol 2000; 42:99-100.
    25) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    26) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    27) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    28) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    29) Clark RF & Hanna TC: Calcium channel blocker toxicity. Top Emerg Med 1993; 15:15-26.
    30) Cohen HJ, Pieper CF, & Hanlon JT: Calcium channel blockers and cancer. Amer J Med 2000; 108:210-215.
    31) Cole JB, Stellpflug SJ, & Engebretsen KM: Asystole immediately following intravenous fat emulsion for overdose. J Med Toxicol 2014; 10(3):307-310.
    32) Connolly DL, Nettleton MA, & Bastow MD: Massive diltiazem overdose. Amer J Cardiol 1993; 72:742-743.
    33) Cumpston KL , Aks SE , Sigg T , et al: Whole bowel irrigation and the hemodynamically unstable calcium channel blocker overdose: primum non nocere. J Emerg Med 2010; 38(2):171-174.
    34) DeRoos FJ: Calcium Channel Blockers. In: Nelson LS, Lewin NA, Howland MA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicological Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    35) DeWitt CR & Waksman JC: Pharmacology, pathophysiology and management of calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker toxicity. Toxicol Rev 2004; 23:223-238.
    36) Dimich I, Profeta J, Jurado R, et al: Reversal of the adverse cardiovascular effects of intravenous diltiazem in anesthetized dogs. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1988; 2(4):455-462.
    37) Donovan JW, O'Donnell S, & Burkhart K: Calcium channel blocker overdose causing mesenteric ischemia (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:628.
    38) Doyon S & Roberts JR: The use of glucagon in a case of calcium channel blocker overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1229-1233.
    39) Durward A, Guerguerian AM, Lefebvre M, et al: Massive diltiazem overdose treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care 2003; 4(3):372-376.
    40) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    41) Engebretsen KM, Kaczmarek KM, Morgan J, et al: High-dose insulin therapy in beta-blocker and calcium channel-blocker poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011; 49(4):277-283.
    42) Erickson FC, Ling LJ, & Grande GA: Diltiazem overdose: case report and review. J Emerg Med 1991; 9:357-366.
    43) Evans JSM & Oram MP: Neurological recovery after prolonged verapamil-induced cardiac arrest. Anaes Intens Care 1999; 27:653-655.
    44) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    45) Fang C-C & Tsai L-M: Hematologic complications of diltiazem overdose. Am Heart J 1993; 126:1017-1018.
    46) Fauville JP, Hantson P, & Honore P: Severe diltiazem poisoning with intestinal pseudo-obstruction: case report and toxicological data. Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:273-277.
    47) Ferner RE, Odemuyiwa O, & Field AB: Pharmacokinetics and toxic effects of diltiazem in massive overdose. Hum Toxicol 1989; 8:497-499.
    48) Flynn JT & Pasko DA: Calcium channel blockers: pharmacology and place in therapy of pediatric hypertension. Pediatr Nephrol 2000; 15:302-316.
    49) Frierson J, Bailly D, & Shultz T: Refractory cardiogenic shock and complete heart block after suspected verapamil-SR and atenolol overdose. Clin Cardiol 1991; 14:933-935.
    50) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    51) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    52) Graudins A, Najafi J, & Rur-SC MP: Treatment of experimental verapamil poisoning with levosimendan utilizing a rodent model of drug toxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46(1):50-56.
    53) Greene SL, Gawarammana I, Wood DM, et al: Relative safety of hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of calcium channel blocker overdose: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33(11):2019-2024.
    54) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    55) Hadjipavlou G, Hafeez A, Messer B, et al: Management of lercanidipine overdose with hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia therapy: case report. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011; 19(1):8.
    56) Hantsch C, Seger D, & Meredith T: Calcium channel antagonist toxicity and hypercalcemia (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:495-496.
    57) Harchelroad F: ARDS associated with calcium channel blocker overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992a; 34:328.
    58) Harchelroad F: Calcium channel blocker overdose associated with marked decline in TSH (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992b; 34:328.
    59) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    60) Haynes RC, Murad F, & Gilman AG: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Macmillan Publishing Co, New York, NY, 1985, pp 1521.
    61) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    62) Henderson A, Stevenson N, & Hackett LP: Diltiazem overdose in an elderly patient: efficacy of adrenaline. Anesth Intens Care 1992; 20:507-510.
    63) Hendren WG, Schieber RS, & Garrettson LK: Extracorporeal bypass for the treatment of verapamil poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18:984-987.
    64) Henrikson CA & Chandra-Strobos N: Calcium channel blocker overdose mimicking an acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation 2003; 59:361-364.
    65) Hofer CA, Smith JK, & Tenholder MF: Verapamil intoxication: a literature review of overdoses and discussion of therapeutic options. Am J Med 1993; 95:431-438.
    66) Holzer M, Sterz F, & Schoerkhuber W: Successful resuscitation of a verapamil-intoxicated patient with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2818-2823.
    67) Howarth DM, Dawson AH, & Smith AJ: Calcium channel blocking drug overdose: am Australian series. Human Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:161-166.
    68) Humbert VH Jr, Munn NJ, & Hawkins RF: Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema complicating massive diltiazem overdose. Chest 1991; 99:258-260.
    69) Hung YM & Olson KR: Acute amlodipine overdose treated by high dose intravenous calcium in a patient with severe renal insufficiency. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(3):301-303.
    70) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    71) Isbister GK: Delayed asystolic cardiac arrest after diltiazem overdose; resuscitation with high dose intravenous calcium. Emerg Med J 2002; 19(4):355-357.
    72) Jaeger A, Sauder P, & Kopferschmitt J: Diltiazem acute poisoning: hemodynamic and kinetic study (abstract 191). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    73) Jang DH, Nelson LS, & Hoffman RS: Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Refractory Shock From an Amlodipine Overdose. Ann Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub-.
    74) Jick H, Jick S, & Derby LE: Calcium-channel blockers and risk of cancer. Lancet 1997; 349:525-528.
    75) Kamijo Y, Yoshida T, Ide A, et al: Mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring in calcium channel blocker poisoning: tissue hypoxia avoidance despite hypotension. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24(3):357-360.
    76) Kanagarajan K, Marraffa JM, Bouchard NC, et al: The use of vasopressin in the setting of recalcitrant hypotension due to calcium channel blocker overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(1):56-59.
    77) Kanamasa K, Kimura A, & Miyataka M: Incidence of cancer in postmyocardial infarction patients treated with short-acting nifedipine and diltiazem. Cancer 1999; 85:1369-1374.
    78) Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al: Use of calcium channel blockers and risk of hospitalized gastrointestinal tract bleeding.. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:1849-1855.
    79) Kirshenbaum LA, Mathews SC, & Sitar DS: Whole-bowel irrigation versus activated charcoal in sorbitol for the ingestion of modified-release pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46:264-271.
    80) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    81) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    82) Koppel C, Fahron G & Kruger A et al: Prolonged resuscitation efforts in serious metoprolol and verapamil overdose. EAPCCT XVII Int Congress Poland, 1995.
    83) Krenzelok EP: Acute calcium channel blocker overdosage. Clin Tox Forum 1991; 3:1-6.
    84) Lahav M & Arav R: Diltiazem and thrombocytopenia (letter). Ann Intern Med 1989; 110:327.
    85) Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al: Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S501-S518.
    86) Leone M, Charvet A, Delmas A, et al: Terlipressin: a new therapeutic for calcium-channel blockers overdose (letter). J Crit Care 2005; 20:114-115.
    87) Levine M, Boyer EW, Pozner CN, et al: Assessment of hyperglycemia after calcium channel blocker overdoses involving diltiazem or verapamil. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(9):2071-2075.
    88) Lheureux PE, Zahir S, Gris M, et al: Bench-to-bedside review: Hyperinsulinaemia/euglycaemia therapy in the management of overdose of calcium-channel blockers. Crit Care (Lond) 2006; 10(3):212-.
    89) Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, et al: The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126(3):477-480.
    90) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    91) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    92) Luomanmaki K, Tiula E, & Kivisto KT: Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in massive overdose. Ther Drug Monitor 1997; 19:240-242.
    93) MacDonald D & Alguire PC: Case report: fatal overdose with sustained-release verapamil. Am J Med Sci 1992; 303:115-117.
    94) Magdalan J: New treatment methods in verapamil poisoning: experimental studies. Polish J Pharmacol 2003; 55:425-432.
    95) Mahr NC, Valdes A, & Lamas G: Use of glucagon for acute intravenous diltiazem toxicity. Amer J Cardiol 1997; 79:1570-1571.
    96) Malcolm N, Callegari P, & Goldberg J: Massive diltiazem overdosage: clinical and pharmacokinetic observations. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1986; 20:888.
    97) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    98) Melanson P, Shir RD, & DeRoos F: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in calcium channel blocker overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35:345.
    99) Mitchell LB, Schroeder JS, & Mason JW: Comparative clinical electrophysiologic effects of diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine: a review. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49:629-635.
    100) Montiel V, Gougnard T, & Hantson P: Diltiazem poisoning treated with hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy and intravenous lipid emulsion. Eur J Emerg Med 2011; 18(2):121-123.
    101) Morimoto S, Sasaki S, & Kiyama M: Sustained-release diltiazem overdose. J Hum Hypertension 1999; 13:643-644.
    102) Moriya F & Hashimoto Y: Redistribution of diltiazem in the early postmortem period. J Analyt Toxicol 2004; 28:269-271.
    103) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    104) Nagao T, Sato M, Nakajima H, et al: Studies on a new 1,5-benzothiazepine derivative (CRD-401): II. Vasodilator actions. Jpn J Pharmacol 1972; 22:1-10.
    105) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    106) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    107) Odeh M: Exfoliative dermatitis associated with diltiazem. Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:101-104.
    108) Okada M, Inoue H, Nakamura Y, et al: Excretion of diltiazem in human milk. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:992-993.
    109) Olson KR, Erdman AR, Woolf AD, et al: Calcium channel blocker ingestion: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(7):797-822.
    110) Papadopoulos J & O'Neil MG: Utilization of a glucagon infusion in the management of a massive nifedipine overdose. J Emerg Med 2000; 18:453-455.
    111) Pearigen PD & Benowitz NL: Poisoning due to calcium antagonists. Experience with verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. Drug Safety 1991; 6:408-430.
    112) Peberdy MA , Callaway CW , Neumar RW , et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 9: post–cardiac arrest care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S768-S786.
    113) Perez E, Chu J, Bania T, et al: L-carnitine increases survival in a murine model of severe verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18(11):1135-1140.
    114) Pichon N, Dugard A, Clavel M, et al: Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Three Cases of Acute Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning With Life-Threatening Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Ann Emerg Med 2011; Epub:Epub.
    115) Pichon N, Francois B, Chevreuil C, et al: Albumin dialysis: a new therapeutic alternative for severe diltiazem intoxication. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(2):195-196.
    116) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    117) Product Information: CARDIZEM(R) LA extended-release oral tablets, diltiazem hydrochloride extended-release oral tablets. Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, 2010.
    118) Product Information: CARDIZEM(R) LA oral extended-release tablets, diltiazem HCl oral extended-release tablets. Abbott Laboratories (per FDA), North Chicago, IL, 2015.
    119) Product Information: CARDIZEM(R) direct compression oral tablets, diltiazem hydrochloride direct compression oral tablets. BTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, 2010.
    120) Product Information: CARDIZEM(R) oral tablets, diltiazem HCl oral tablets. Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC (per FDA), Bridgewater, NJ, 2014.
    121) Product Information: DILACOR XR(R) oral extended release capsule, diltizaem HCl oral extended release capsule. Watson Pharma, Inc. (per DailyMed), Corona, CA, 2011.
    122) Product Information: Isuprel(TM) intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection, isoproterenol HCl intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, intracardiac injection. Hospira, Inc. (per FDA), Lake Forest, IL, 2013.
    123) Product Information: Tiazac(R) oral extended-release capsules, diltiazem HCl oral extended-release capsules. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc (per manufacturer), St. Louis, MO, 2011.
    124) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    125) Product Information: diltiazem HCl 0.5% intravenous injection, diltiazem HCl 0.5% intravenous injection. Akorn, Inc. (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2012.
    126) Product Information: dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection, dobutamine HCl 5% dextrose intravenous injection. Baxter Healthcare Corporation (per DailyMed), Deerfield, IL, 2012.
    127) Product Information: dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection, dopamine hcl, 5% dextrose IV injection. Hospira,Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2004.
    128) Product Information: inamrinone intravenous solution, inamrinone intravenous solution. Bedford Laboratories, Bedford, OH, 2002.
    129) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    130) Product Information: norepinephrine bitartrate injection, norepinephrine bitartrate injection. Sicor Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Irvine, CA, 2005.
    131) Product Information: phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection, phenylephrine HCl subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, intravenous injection. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2011.
    132) Quezado Z, Lippmann M, & Wertheimer J: Severe cardiac, respiratory, and metabolic complications of massive verapamil overdose. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:436-438.
    133) Ramoska EA, Spiller HA, & Winter M: A one-year evaluation of calcium channel blocker overdoses: toxicity and treatment. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:196-200.
    134) Rankin RJ & Edwards IR: Overdose of sustained release verapamil (letter). NZ Med J 1990; 103:165.
    135) Ranniger C & Roche C: Are one or two dangerous? Calcium channel blocker exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 2007; 33(2):145-154.
    136) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    137) Rey JL, Lecuyer D, & Bernasconi P: Self poisoning with diltiazem resulting in sinus failure and atrio-ventricular block. Presse Med 1983; 12:1873-1874.
    138) Roberts D, Honcharik N, & Sitar DS: Diltiazem overdose: pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its metabolites and effect of multiple dose charcoal therapy. Clin Toxicol 1991; 29:45-52.
    139) Rodgers GC, Al-Mahasneh QM, & White SL: Treatment of severe sustained release verapamil poisoning with cardiac pacing: a case report (abstract 190). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:377.
    140) Romano G, Barbera N, Rossitto C, et al: Lethal diltiazem poisoning. J Anal Toxicol 2002; 26(6):374-377.
    141) Roper TA, Sykes R, & Gray C: Fatal diltiazem overdose: a report of four cases and review of the literature. Postgrad Med J 1993; 69:474-476.
    142) Roper TA: Overdose of diltiazem (letter). Br Med J 1994; 308:1571.
    143) Sahney S: A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension. Paediatr Drugs 2006; 8(6):357-373.
    144) Sanders P, Walker J, & Craig RJ: Mibefradil (Posicor) induced sinus arrest. Aust NZ J Med 1998; 28:836-837.
    145) Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Addario C, et al: Successful treatment with enoximone for severe poisoning with atenolol and verapamil: a case report. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48:790-792.
    146) Satchithananda DK, Stone DL, & Chauhan A: Unrecognised accidental overdose with diltiazem. Br Med J 2000; 321:160-161.
    147) Sato M, Nagao T, Yamaguchi I, et al: Pharmacological studies on a new 1,5-benzothiazepine derivative (CRD-401) 1. Cardiovascular actions. Arzneimittelforschung 1971; 21:1338.
    148) Schwab M, Oetzel C, & Morike K: Using trade names. A risk factor for accidental drug overdose. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:1065-1066.
    149) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    150) Shepherd G & Klein-Schwartz W: High-dose insulin therapy for calcium-channel blocker overdose. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39:923-930.
    151) Smith SW, Ling LJ, & Halstenson CE: Whole-bowel irrigation as a treatment for acute lithium overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:536-539.
    152) Snook CP, Sigvaldason K, & Kristinsson J: Severe atenolol and diltiazem overdose. Clin Toxicol 2000; 38:661-665.
    153) Snover SW & Bocchino V: Massive diltiazem overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1221-1224.
    154) Sorensen HT, Olsen JH, & Mellemkjaer L: Cancer risk and mortality in users of calcium channel blockers. Cancer 2000; 89:165-170.
    155) Sorrentino A: Update on pediatric resuscitation drugs: high dose, low dose, or no dose at all. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17(2):223-226.
    156) Spiller HA, Meyers A, & Ziemba T: Delayed onset of cardiac arrhythmias from sustained-release verapamil. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:201-203.
    157) Sporer KA & Manning JJ: Massive ingestion of sustained-release verapamil with a concretion and bowel infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:603-605.
    158) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    159) St-Onge M, Ajmo I, Poirier D, et al: L-Carnitine for the Treatment of a Calcium Channel Blocker and Metformin Poisoning. J Med Toxicol 2013; Epub:Epub-.
    160) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    161) Sun DK, Reiner D, & Frishman W: Adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 34:953-966.
    162) Szekely LA, Thompson BT, & Woolf A: Use of partial liquid ventilation to manage pulmonary complications of acute verapamil-sustained release poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:475-479.
    163) Takahashi h, Ohashi n, & Motokawa K: Poisoning caused by the combined ingestion of nifedipine and metoprolol. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:631-637.
    164) Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, & Kraus DM (Eds): Pediatric Dosage Handbook, 4th. Lexi-Comp, Inc, Cleveland, OH, 1997.
    165) Tanen DA, Ruha AM, & Curry SC: Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is effective in the acute management of verapamil toxicity in a swine model. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36:547-553.
    166) Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, et al: Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13(2):134-139.
    167) Tenenbein M, Cohen S, & Sitar DS: Whole bowel irrigation as a decontamination procedure after acute drug overdose. Arch Int Med 1987; 147:905-907.
    168) Thomas AR, Chan LN, & Bauman JL: Prolongation of the QT interval related to cisapride-diltiazem interaction. Pharmacother 1998; 18:381-385.
    169) Vale JA, Kulig K, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, et al: Position paper: Gastric lavage. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42:933-943.
    170) Vale JA: Position Statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:711-719.
    171) Varpula T, Rapola J, Sallisalmi M, et al: Treatment of serious calcium channel blocker overdose with levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(3):790-792.
    172) Verbrugge LB & vanWezel HB: Pathophysiology of verapamil overdose: new insights in the role of insulin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21(3):406-409.
    173) Vinson DR, Burke TF, & Sung HM: Rapid reversal of life-threatening diltiazem-induced tetany with calcium chloride. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34:676-678.
    174) Watling SM, Crain JL, & Edwards TD: Verapamil overdose: case report and review of the literature. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26:1373-1377.
    175) Welch CD, Knoerzer RE, & Lewis GS: Verapamil and acebutolol overdose results in asystole: intra-aortic balloon pump provides mechanical support. J Extra-Corporeal Tech 1992; 24:36-37.
    176) White RD, Goldsmith RS, & Rodrigues R: Plasma ionic calcium levels following injection of chloride, gluconate, and gluceptate salts of calcium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71:609-613.
    177) Wilffert B, Boskma RJ, vanderVoort PH, et al: 4-Aminopyridine (fampridine) effectively treats amlodipine poisoning: a case report. J Clin Pharm Ther 2007; 32(6):655-657.
    178) Williamson KM & Dunham GD: Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in an overdose situation. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30:608-611.
    179) Wills BK, Liu JM, & Wahl M: Third-degree AV block from extended-release diltiazem ingestion in a nine-month-old. J Emerg Med 2010; 38(3):328-331.
    180) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    181) Wilson BJ, Cruikshank JS, Wiebe KL, et al: Intravenous lipid emulsion therapy for sustained release diltiazem poisoning: a case report. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2012; 19(2):e218-e222.
    182) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    183) Wood DM, Wright KD, Jones AL, et al: Metaraminol (Aramine(R)) in the management of a significant amlodipine overdose. Human Exp Toxicol 2005; 24:377-381.
    184) Yuan TH, Kerns WP, & Tomaszewski CA: Insulin-glucose as adjunctive therapy for severe calcium channel antagonist poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:463-474.
    185) Yust I & Hoffman: Life-threatening bradycardic reactions due to beta blocker-diltiazem interactions. Isr J Med Sci 1992; 28:292-294.
    186) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.
    187) ter Wee PM, Kremer Hovinga TK, Uges DRA, et al: 4-Aminopyridine and haemodialysis in the treatment of verapamil intoxication. Human Toxicol 1985; 4:327-329.