MOBILE VIEW  | 

DIETHYLENE GLYCOL

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Diethylene glycol (DEG) is a glycol compound possessing toxicity similar to ethylene glycol. It is a CNS depressant, and potent kidney and liver toxin when ingested.

Specific Substances

    1) 2, 2'-Oxybisethanol
    2) 2, 2'-Oxydiethanol
    3) Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)ether
    4) DEG
    5) Diethylene ether
    6) Diethylene glycol
    7) Diethylenglykol (Czech)
    8) Digenos
    9) Diglycol
    10) Digol
    11) Dihydroxydiethyl ether
    12) 2,2'-Dihydroxydiethyl ether
    13) beta,beta'-Dihydroxydiethyl ether
    14) Dihydroxyethylether
    15) 2,2'-Dihydroxyethyl ether
    16) Ethanol, 2,2'-oxybis-
    17) Ethanol, 2,2'-oxydi-
    18) Ethylene diglycol
    19) Glycol ether
    20) Glycol ethyl ether
    21) 2-Hydroxyethyl ether
    22) bis(2-Hydroxyethyl)ether
    23) 3-Oxapentane-1,5-diol
    24) 3-Oxa-1,5-pentanediol
    25) 2,2'-Oxybisethanol
    26) 2,2'-Oxybis-ethanol
    27) 2,2'-Oxydiethanol
    28) 2,2'-Oxyethanol
    29) C4-H10-O3
    30) CAS 111-46-6
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C4-H10-O3
    2) (HOCH2CH2)2O

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) Diethylene glycol is a colorless, viscous, hygroscopic, non-corrosive liquid. It is essentially odorless, with a sweet taste (Bingham et al, 2001; Lewis, 2001a; Lewis, 1998).
    2) Diethylene glycol is available in several grades, including technical, regular, and polyester. It is also available as 100% pure product (CHRIS, 2004; HSDB, 2004).
    3) Commercial sources of diethylene glycol may be contaminated with ethylene glycol (Wiener & Richardson, 1989).
    B) SOURCES
    1) PRODUCTION
    a) Diethylene glycol is produced commercially as a by-product of ethylene glycol manufacture (Bingham et al, 2001; Lewis, 2001).
    b) Diethylene glycol is prepared by the reaction of ethylene glycol with ethylene oxide (Bingham et al, 2001).
    c) It is produced by hydration of ethylene oxide (Ashford, 2001).
    2) AS A CONTAMINANT
    a) In one study, 15 of 68 (22%) samples taken from over-the-counter health products imported to the United States from China or Hong Kong, contained detectable levels of DEG (mean, 18.8 mcg/mL; range, 0.791 to 110.1 mcg/mL; and volume to volume (v/v) range, 0.00007 to 0.01%). The DEG concentration from Panama mass poisoning (8.1% DEG) was 810 times higher than the product in this study with the highest DEG level (110 mcg/mL; 0.01% v/v), PH Balance Plus (Tong Fond Ning). In this study, the highest estimated daily dose (0.09 mg/kg) was about 150 times lower than the lowest reported toxic dose (14 mg/kg) from a mass DEG poisoning event (Schier et al, 2011).
    b) Diethylene glycol stearate and free diethylene glycol (6.2 to 7.1 g/kg) were found on analysis of a silver sulfadiazine product (Cantarell et al, 1987).
    c) Commercial polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution used in patients has been analyzed and found to contain diethylene glycol at mean concentrations of 4.3 mcg/mL (Woolf & Pearson, 1995).
    d) Diethylene glycol has been found as an illegal adulterant in white wines in concentrations up to 100 mg/L (Lawrence et al, 1986).
    e) Diethylene glycol was detected as a contaminant in acetaminophen and paracetamol elixirs manufactured in South Africa (in 1969; brand names of Pronap and Plaxim), in Nigeria (in 1990), Bangladesh (in 1995), Haiti (in 1996, brand names Afebril and Valodon), and in India (in 1998, brand names Enchest and Decoryl) (Singh et al, 2001; O'Brien et al, 1998; Scalzo A, 1996; Hanif et al, 1995; Okuonghae et al, 1992; Bowie & McKenzie, 1972) .
    C) USES
    1) Diethylene glycol has many industrial uses, including: as a component in antifreeze and gas conditioning formulations, brake fluids, cosmetics, lubricants, mold-release agents, inks, book-binding adhesives, and dyeing agents; as a softening agent for textiles; as a plasticizer for cork, adhesives, paper, and packaging materials; in production of diethylene glycol dinitrate, triethylene glycol, and polyurethane; in production of resins, morpholine, and diethylene glycol esters and ethers; in natural gas processing; as a solvent; as a humectant for tobacco, casein, and synthetic sponges (HSDB, 2004; Ashford, 2001; Bingham et al, 2001; Lewis, 2001a; Lewis, 1998).
    2) Liquid form of the canned-heat cooking fuel, "Sterno," contains 100% diethylene glycol (Rollins et al, 2002).
    3) Use of diethylene glycol as a solvent in pharmaceutical preparations, in some instances as a substitute for propylene glycol or glycerin, has resulted in numerous poisoning deaths:
    a) Elixir sulfanilamide was manufactured in the United States for 2 months in 1937 by SE Massengill Co and contained 72% diethylene glycol as a vehicle (Geiling & Cannon, 1938a).
    b) In 1969, sedative mixtures in South Africa contained diethylene glycol as a diluent (Bowie & McKenzie, 1972).
    c) In 1990 to 1992, diethylene glycol-containing paracetamol elixirs were manufactured by separate pharmaceutical companies in Bangladesh and Nigeria (Hanif et al, 1995; Okuonghae et al, 1992).
    d) In 1996, diethylene glycol was detected at a median concentration of 14.4% in acetaminophen syrup manufactured in Haiti (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    e) In 1998, a brand of cough expectorant manufactured in India contained 17.5% (v/v) diethylene glycol (Singh et al, 2001).
    f) In 2006, 78 patients died in Panama after ingesting DEG-containing cough syrup (average of 8.1% DEG) manufactured in China from glycerine containing about 22.1% DEG (Schep et al, 2009).
    g) In 2006, 12 patients died in China after receiving intravenous armillarisin-A contaminated with DEG (Schep et al, 2009).
    h) In 2008, 84 children died in Nigeria after ingesting acetaminophen-based teething syrup contaminated with DEG (Schep et al, 2009).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Diethylene glycol is an industrial solvent and intermediate in the polymers and higher glycols. It can also be found in radiator fluid, antifreeze, brake fluid, Sterno, wall stripper, and in cleaning solutions.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Diethylene glycol is metabolized to 2-hydroxyethoxyacetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase oxidation, then to 2-hydroxyacetic acid (HEAA) by aldehyde dehydrogenase. HEAA causes acidosis, renal failure, and neurologic dysfunction. It is thought that the parent compound is toxic as well. Therefore, despite alcohol dehydrogenase blockade, patients may go on to develop signs of end organ toxicity.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Inadvertent exposures to low concentration products are relatively common but generally do not result in significant toxicity. Large, deliberate acute ingestions may cause life-threatening toxicity. Most fatalities have involved epidemics where people (primarily children) were repeatedly exposed due to contaminated medication in developing countries with weak manufacturing controls and limited access to intensive medical care.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Common initial symptoms are heartburn, followed by nausea and abdominal cramps, vomiting and occasionally diarrhea. Headaches are also reported.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Inebriation and metabolic acidosis may develop early. Later symptoms include back pain and severe abdominal pain; pancreatitis has also been reported after poisoning. Polyuria develops, followed by oliguria, anuria, and renal failure. Hepatotoxicity may develop. CNS depression, obtundation, or coma are common late in the course of toxicity, generally 3 to 5 days after exposure. Metabolism produces an acidosis caused by a toxic metabolite of the parent compound. CNS and respiratory depression, coma, respiratory arrest, and pulmonary edema have preceded death in reported cases. Tremors and rare seizures may accompany uremia. Peripheral and/or cranial neuropathies with bulbar palsy may develop weeks after severe poisoning.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for diethylene glycol in humans.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs, mental status and neurologic exam.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, glucose and bicarbonate, hepatic enzymes, and renal function.
    C) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients with metabolic acidosis.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treat vomiting with antiemetics; administer intravenous fluids if hypovolemia develops.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treat hypotension with IV fluids; if hypotension persists, add vasopressors. Correct severe acidosis with sodium bicarbonate. Treat seizures with benzodiazepines; add propofol or barbiturates if seizures persist or recur. Administer an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor (fomepizole or ethanol) to patients who develop metabolic acidosis, systemic toxicity, or have a history of a large ingestion. Emergent hemodialysis should also be performed in these patients.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Consider insertion of a nasogastric tube and aspiration of stomach contents after a large, recent (within an hour) ingestion. Administer activated charcoal for significant, recent ingestion.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Intubation may be indicated if the patient's mental status is so depressed they cannot protect their airway. The ventilator should be adjusted to assure that the patient is able to maintain any respiratory compensation for the metabolic acidosis. Failure to maintain ventilation can result in a dramatic fall in pH and cardiovascular collapse.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) The role of alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors for treatment of diethylene glycol toxicity is not completely defined. Unlike methanol and ethylene glycol, there is evidence that diethylene glycol may cause toxicity without metabolism. However, given the severe toxicity of the metabolites, it is recommended that significant exposures be treated with alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors as a temporizing measure while dialysis is being arranged.
    a) FOMEPIZOLE VS ETHANOL: Fomepizole is easier to use clinically, requires less monitoring, and does not cause CNS depression or hypoglycemia. Ethanol requires continuous administration and frequent monitoring of serum ethanol and glucose levels, and may cause CNS depression and hypoglycemia (especially in children). The drug cost associated with ethanol use is generally much lower than with fomepizole; however, other costs associated with ethanol use (continuous intravenous infusion, hourly blood draws and ethanol levels, possibly greater use of hemodialysis) may make the costs more comparable.
    b) FOMEPIZOLE: Fomepizole is administered as a 15 mg/kg loading dose, followed by four bolus doses of 10 mg/kg every 12 hours. If therapy is needed beyond this 48 hour period, the dose is then increased to 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for as long as necessary. Fomepizole is also effectively removed by hemodialysis; therefore, doses should be repeated following each round of hemodialysis.
    c) ETHANOL: Ethanol is given to maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% to 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line. Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated, followed by an infusion rate of 80 to 150 mg/kg/hr (for 10% ethanol, 0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr for a non-drinker; 1.5 mL/kg/hr for a chronic alcoholic). During hemodialysis, either add ethanol to the dialysate to achieve 100 mg/dL concentration or increase the rate of infusion during dialysis (for 10% ethanol, 2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr). Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentration. The loading dose is 0.8 grams/kg (4 mL/kg of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube. Maintenance dose is 80 to 150 mg/kg/hour (of 20% {40 proof}) ethanol; 0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hour for a non-drinker; 0.8 mL/kg/hour for a chronic alcoholic). Concentrations greater than 30% (60 proof) ethanol should be diluted. For both modalities, blood ethanol levels must be monitored hourly and adjusted accordingly, and both require patient monitoring in an ICU setting.
    F) ACIDOSIS
    1) Severe acidosis can be treated with IV sodium bicarbonate. Begin with 1 to 2 mEq/kg in adults and 1 mEq/kg in children, repeat every 1 to 2 hours as required. Monitor blood gases to adjust dose.
    G) SEIZURES
    1) Administer IV benzodiazepines; barbiturates or propofol may be needed if seizures persist or recur. Monitor for hypotension, dysrhythmias, respiratory depression, and need for endotracheal intubation. Evaluate for hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoxia.
    H) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) Diethylene glycol and the toxic metabolites are effectively cleared by hemodialysis. Hemodialysis should be considered following large ingestions as it can limit the toxic effects due to un-metabolized diethylene glycol. Dialysis is also indicated in severe acid-base disturbances or renal failure, and in any patient treated with alcohol dehydrogenase blockers (fomepizole or ethanol).
    I) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic patients with inadvertent ingestion of a lick, sip or taste, and patients with dermal or eye exposures can be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients who have symptoms and those with larger or deliberate ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for evaluation. A 12-hour observation period is warranted with serial basic metabolic panels evaluating for evidence of metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with symptoms (eg, CNS depression) or laboratory abnormalities (eg, metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction) should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe signs and symptoms. Consult a nephrologist for emergent hemodialysis in any patient with metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction.
    J) PITFALLS
    1) A normal osmolar gap does NOT rule out a significant diethylene glycol exposure. Laboratory and clinical findings change during the course of toxicity.
    K) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Diethylene glycol is rapidly absorbed after ingestion, with maximal serum concentrations achieved at 1 to 2 hours postingestion. Dermal absorption is minimal. The volume of distribution is unknown in humans. Half-life is dose-dependent and metabolism is saturable. In rats in lower concentrations, diethylene glycol exhibits first order kinetics. It crosses the blood brain barrier.
    L) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Toxicity from other toxic alcohols such as methanol and ethylene glycol. Also, the neurologic constellation of symptoms typical of demyelinating disorders can appear clinically similar.
    2) CNS depression: Other toxic alcohols, benzodiazepines, opiates/opioids, antipsychotic medications, etc.
    3) Elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis: Ketones, uremia, lactic acidosis, other toxins (iron, methanol, etc.), or alcoholic ketoacidosis.
    4) Renal injury: Other nephrotoxic drugs (eg, NSAIDs, aminoglycoside antibiotics), dehydration, etc.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) The average fatal dose is difficult to estimate. Much of the data is from historical sources or from epidemics that have occurred in patients in developing countries with limited access to medical care. Extrapolation from these sources must therefore be interpreted with caution. The average fatal dose in people who drank a sulfanilamide elixir with diethylene glycol as the vehicle was approximately 1 mL (72% concentration of DEG) per kilogram body weight. However, the actual reported fatal doses were highly variable.
    B) ADULT
    1) Three men died after consuming approximately 2 to 3 cups each of 100% diethylene glycol, as an ethanol substitute.
    2) A 56-year-old man died after ingesting 8 ounces of 100% diethylene glycol in a suicide attempt.
    3) Adults who ingested sulfanilamide contaminated with diethylene glycol survived doses of 1 to 240 milliliters (of a 72% solution).
    C) PEDIATRIC
    1) Median diethylene glycol dose that was fatal in 85 (98%) of 87 children was estimated to be 1.34 mL/kg (range 0.22 to 4.42 mL/kg). Twelve children ingested less than 1 mL/kg.
    2) Forty-nine children survived ingestion of a median dose of 0.67 mL/kg (range of 0.05 - 2.48 mL/kg) diethylene glycol present in contaminated acetaminophen syrup.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Diethylene glycol is an industrial solvent and intermediate in the polymers and higher glycols. It can also be found in radiator fluid, antifreeze, brake fluid, Sterno, wall stripper, and in cleaning solutions.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Diethylene glycol is metabolized to 2-hydroxyethoxyacetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase oxidation, then to 2-hydroxyacetic acid (HEAA) by aldehyde dehydrogenase. HEAA causes acidosis, renal failure, and neurologic dysfunction. It is thought that the parent compound is toxic as well. Therefore, despite alcohol dehydrogenase blockade, patients may go on to develop signs of end organ toxicity.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Inadvertent exposures to low concentration products are relatively common but generally do not result in significant toxicity. Large, deliberate acute ingestions may cause life-threatening toxicity. Most fatalities have involved epidemics where people (primarily children) were repeatedly exposed due to contaminated medication in developing countries with weak manufacturing controls and limited access to intensive medical care.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Common initial symptoms are heartburn, followed by nausea and abdominal cramps, vomiting and occasionally diarrhea. Headaches are also reported.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Inebriation and metabolic acidosis may develop early. Later symptoms include back pain and severe abdominal pain; pancreatitis has also been reported after poisoning. Polyuria develops, followed by oliguria, anuria, and renal failure. Hepatotoxicity may develop. CNS depression, obtundation, or coma are common late in the course of toxicity, generally 3 to 5 days after exposure. Metabolism produces an acidosis caused by a toxic metabolite of the parent compound. CNS and respiratory depression, coma, respiratory arrest, and pulmonary edema have preceded death in reported cases. Tremors and rare seizures may accompany uremia. Peripheral and/or cranial neuropathies with bulbar palsy may develop weeks after severe poisoning.

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) IRRITATION: No appreciable ophthalmic irritation has been reported following exposure in animals (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    B) CORNEAL LESIONS: have been reported in cattle following oral exposures of 1.5 mL/kg (Coppock et al, 1996). Human ophthalmic effects have not been reported.

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) TACHYARRHYTHMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachycardia may occur (Okuonghae et al, 1992).
    B) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Blood pressure of 105/60 mm Hg has been reported in a 15-year-old girl following the ingestion of 200 mL brake fluid containing 55% triethylene glycol and 10% DEG. Dobutamine infusion was used to support blood pressure (Borron et al, 1997).
    b) CASE REPORT: Hypertension (170/100 mmHg) followed by hypotension (systolic 100 mmHg) occurred in a 29-year-old man following dermal application, over several months, of brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to treat a "dermatitis" (Devoti et al, 2015).
    C) HYPERTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Significant hypertension, refractory to drug treatment, has been reported in 3 fatalities due to ingestion of 2 to 3 cups of 100% diethylene glycol as an ethanol substitute. All 3 patients presented to the emergency department 6 days following the ingestions with delayed onset of symptoms. Death was due to renal failure (Doyle et al, 1998).
    b) CASE SERIES: Hypertension occurred in 5 of 11 patients (45.5%) who ingested locally prepared antipyretic medications (daily doses ranging from 15 to 30 mL) containing acetaminophen and contaminated with diethylene glycol. The amount of diethylene glycol in the medications ranged from 2.3% to 22.3%. All 4 patients also developed acute renal failure and encephalopathy requiring ventilation (Hari et al, 2006).
    c) CASE REPORT: Hypertension (170/100 mmHg) followed by hypotension (systolic 100 mmHg) occurred in a 29-year-old man following dermal application, over several months, of brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to treat a "dermatitis" (Devoti et al, 2015).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) APNEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Death may occur from sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation is a severe neurological manifestation of acute DEG poisoning (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old man presented with nausea, abdominal pain, weakness, hypertension, and anuria. Laboratory results revealed severe renal failure (serum creatinine 15.5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 4.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), elevated transaminase concentrations, elevated serum lipase concentration, and metabolic acidosis. Interview of the patient's family revealed that he had been applying brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to his skin for several months to treat a "dermatitis". Despite supportive therapy, including hemodialysis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration, the patient developed progressive drowsiness, hypotension, and respiratory failure necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation. A renal biopsy was performed which indicated acute toxic proximal tubular necrosis without oxalate crystals. Over the next several days, the patient's neurologic status deteriorated with the development of ascending paralysis, areflexia, loss of corneal, vestibulo-ocular, and gag reflexes, and coma (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3). With continued supportive care, the patient's neurologic and renal function gradually improved, with normalization of renal function parameters (serum creatinine of 1.26 mg/dL and eGFR 89 mL/min/1.73) approximately 33 days post-admission. Following transfer to a rehabilitation unit and subsequent discharge 5 months later, the patient recovered neurologically, with a return in his ability to walk, speak, and hear (Devoti et al, 2015).
    B) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pulmonary edema has been reported (Hagebusch, 1937).
    C) HYPERVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tachypnea may occur secondary to acidosis (Okuonghae et al, 1992).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Drowsiness, headache, progressive obtundation and coma have preceded death (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939; O'Brien et al, 1998; Doyle et al, 1998; Wax, 1996).
    b) CASE SERIES: Coma developed 3 to 5 days after severe poisoning with diethylene glycol in 7 fatal cases (Drut et al, 1994).
    c) Drowsiness may be delayed approximately 24 hours after ingestion (Geiling & Cannon, 1938). Altered consciousness, as described by parents, developed in 17 of 86 (20%) children following ingestions of DEG-contaminated acetaminophen (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 15-year-old girl was reported with a Glasgow coma scale score of 7 approximately 2 hr following the ingestion of 200 mL of brake fluid containing 55% triethylene glycol and 10% diethylene glycol. She was later admitted to ICU in stage II coma with bilateral clonus and severe agitation (Borron et al, 1997).
    B) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe neurological effects, consisting of encephalopathy, optic neuritis, fixed and dilated pupils, unilateral facial paralysis, respiratory failure, and coma, were reported in a case series of 109 children who ingested DEG-contaminated acetaminophen (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    b) Delayed neurological effects, such as quadriparesis, sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy, fulminant ascending paralysis, demyelinating peripheral neuropathy, bulbar palsy, and sensorimotor polyneuropathy have been reported in some patients 10 to 47 days after exposure. It is suggested that the presence of severe metabolic acidemia with established renal failure on presentation may be predictive of subsequent delayed neurological toxicity (Reddy et al, 2010; Alfred et al, 2005; Hasbani et al, 2005).
    c) Two weeks after ingesting diethylene glycol, three patients developed significant cranial neuropathies with bulbar palsy (Alfred et al, 2005).
    1) Patient 1 experienced complete hearing loss and blindness and developed a bulbar palsy and a rapidly declining level of consciousness. Cerebral MRI revealed high-intensity signals suggestive of foci of edema or infarction within the left parietal and occipital lobes, and both cerebellar hemispheres. He eventually died with cerebral edema and a progressive encephalopathy (Alfred et al, 2005).
    2) Patient 2 developed a bulbar palsy with associated lower limb weakness. EMG and nerve conduction studies revealed a sensory-motor neuropathy involving the lower limbs. His neurologic injury improved over the next 4 to 6 months, but he remained hemodialysis-dependent (Alfred et al, 2005).
    3) Patient 3 developed agitation, and a prolonged tonic-clonic seizure requiring sedation. Approximately two weeks postingestion, he experienced a bulbar palsy and unilateral facial nerve paresis. Although these symptoms improved over the next 4 to 6 months, residual mild facial nerve palsy persisted (Alfred et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old man presented with a 4-day history of nausea, general weakness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and progressive oligo-anuria after the inadvertent ingestion of a colorless, sweet-tasting beverage containing diethylene glycol 5 days before presentation. Laboratory analysis revealed acute renal failure and anion-gap metabolic acidosis with normal osmolal gap. Urinalysis showed mild proteinuria (1.5 g/day) without crystalluria and a kidney biopsy showed acute and extensive tubular injuries, without intratubular oxalate crystals. He underwent intermittent hemodialysis, however, at this time, he developed a transient increase in liver and pancreatic enzymes. He also became lethargic on day 7, and he developed peripheral facial diplegia, and flaccid tetraparesis with an acute loss of visual acuity. Following supportive care, his condition gradually improved and he was able to walk 34 days after presentation. However, on follow-up 8 months later, complete peripheral facial diplegia and a slight impairment in renal function (serum creatinine 1.7 mg/dL) were noted (Morelle et al, 2010).
    e) CASE SERIES: Encephalopathy, requiring ventilation, was reported in 11 children (ages ranging from 7 to 42 months) following ingestion of locally prepared antipyretic medications. The daily dose ranged from 15 to 30 mL. All 11 patients also experienced acute renal failure. Despite peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, 8 of the 11 patients died due to worsening encephalopathy. Neurologic sequelae was present in the 3 patients who survived and abnormal renal function without dialysis continued to persist in one patient. Further investigation of the antipyretic medications ingested by 6 of the 11 patients revealed that they contained acetaminophen and contaminated with diethylene glycol in amounts ranging from 2.3% to 22.3% (median 15.4% w/w) (Hari et al, 2006).
    f) CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old man presented with nausea, abdominal pain, weakness, hypertension, and anuria. Laboratory results revealed severe renal failure (serum creatinine 15.5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 4.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), elevated transaminase concentrations, elevated serum lipase concentration, and metabolic acidosis. Interview of the patient's family revealed that he had been applying brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to his skin for several months to treat a "dermatitis". Despite supportive therapy, including hemodialysis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration, the patient developed progressive drowsiness, hypotension, and respiratory failure necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation. A renal biopsy was performed which indicated acute toxic proximal tubular necrosis without oxalate crystals. Over the next several days, the patient's neurologic status deteriorated with the development of ascending paralysis, areflexia, loss of corneal, vestibulo-ocular, and gag reflexes, and coma (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3). With continued supportive care, the patient's neurologic and renal function gradually improved, with normalization of renal function parameters (serum creatinine of 1.26 mg/dL and eGFR 89 mL/min/1.73) approximately 33 days post-admission. Following transfer to a rehabilitation unit and subsequent discharge 5 months later, the patient recovered neurologically, with a return in his ability to walk, speak, and hear (Devoti et al, 2015).
    C) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cerebral edema has been reported after severe diethylene glycol poisoning (Drut et al, 1994).
    D) SECONDARY PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Paresthesias developed in several patients with fatal diethylene glycol poisoning. On autopsy these patients showed demyelination of peripheral nerves (Drut et al, 1994).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old child was reported to have evidence of CNS and peripheral demyelination after 5 days of anuria following ingestion of DEG adulterated acetaminophen (Scalzo A, 1996).
    c) CASE REPORT: Following the ingestion of a solution containing diethylene glycol (28,000 mg/dL DEG [28%]; 2,500 mg/dL propylene glycol [2.5%]) and vodka, a 24-year-old man developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, encephalopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. He developed progressive lethargy, facial diparesis, quadriparesis and areflexia, loss of corneal, vestibulo-ocular, and gag reflexes 5 days postingestion. Electrodiagnostic studies revealed absent left median, radial, and ulnar sensory responses and low-amplitude motor responses with preserved conduction velocity and minimally prolonged distal motor latencies. Studies during recovery period showed marked motor conduction velocity slowing and prolonged distal latencies. At the time of discharge, approximately 5 months postingestion, he could speak and had near-normal cognition with some memory deficits, moderate facial disparesis, residual mild distal weakness in both upper and lower extremities (4/5), absent reflexes, and length-dependent loss of pain, temperature, and vibration (Hasbani et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man intentionally ingested 16 ounces of wallpaper stripper (26% DEG) and presented 24 hours later with nausea and vomiting, as well as an anion gap acidosis. Over the proceeding days, the patient developed renal failure, hepatocellular damage, and neurological deficits. An electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction velocity (NCV) study showed sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy without demyelination. Methylprednisolone 500 mg was initiated, but the patient became quadriparetic necessitating intubation on day 12. Repeat EMG/NCV on day 56 showed severe demyelinating sensorimotor peripheral polyneuropathy. Despite supportive care, the patient continued to have diminished neurological function and was dialysis dependent 6 months following the ingestion (Marraffa et al, 2008).
    E) OPTIC NEURITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Optic neuritis is a severe neurological manifestation of acute DEG poisoning (Morelle et al, 2010; O'Brien et al, 1998).
    b) CASE REPORT: Mydriasis, optic neuritis and sixth nerve palsy, with sudden onset and evidence of demyelination, developed in a child several days following ingestion of DEG (Scalzo A, 1996).
    F) CEREBRAL ATROPHY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cerebral atrophy has been reported (Scalzo A, 1996).
    G) CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Autopsy findings in 7 patients with severe diethylene glycol poisoning revealed hemorrhagic infarcts, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and areas of demyelination (Drut et al, 1994).
    H) SEIZURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Seizures may accompany severe cases of uremia/renal failure and have been reported in pediatric ingestions of DEG contaminated acetaminophen (Okuonghae et al, 1992; Wax, 1996).
    b) CASE SERIES: Seizures occurred in 4 of 11 patients (36.4%) who ingested locally prepared antipyretic medications (daily doses ranging from 15 to 30 mL) containing acetaminophen and contaminated with diethylene glycol. The amount of diethylene glycol in the medications ranged from 2.3% to 22.3%. All 4 patients also developed acute renal failure and encephalopathy requiring ventilation (Hari et al, 2006).
    c) CASE REPORT: One patient of three who ingested diethylene glycol developed agitation and a prolonged tonic-clonic seizure requiring sedation (Alfred et al, 2005).
    3.7.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) CNS EFFECTS
    a) CATTLE: Following oral exposures of 1.5 mL/kg, histopathologic findings included diffuse ganglioneuronal atrophy and perineuronal amphicytic hypertrophy of the Gasserian ganglion in cattle (Coppock et al, 1996).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PANCREATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE SERIES: Pancreatitis with diffuse fatty necrosis was reported at autopsy in 7 patients with acute diethylene glycol poisoning (Drut et al, 1994).
    b) Increased serum amylase and lipase concentrations were reported in children following ingestion of DEG adulterated acetaminophen (Scalzo A, 1996). Pancreatitis was reported as a toxic effect in children, most of whom presented with renal failure, in a case series of children poisoned by ingestion of DEG-contaminated acetaminophen (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    c) One man developed a transient increase in liver and pancreatic enzymes after ingesting a colorless, sweet-tasting beverage containing DEG (Morelle et al, 2010).
    d) CASE REPORT: Increased serum lipase concentration (3,027 International Units/L; reference less than 216 International Units/L) occurred in a 29-year-old man who applied brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to his skin for several months to treat a "dermatitis" (Devoti et al, 2015).
    B) GASTRITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Common initial symptoms are nausea, abdominal cramps and vomiting (Devoti et al, 2015; Marraffa et al, 2008; Hasbani et al, 2005; Wax, 1996). Hematemesis may occur (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939). Heartburn is a common symptom (Geiling & Cannon, 1938). Diarrhea may occur (Geiling & Cannon, 1938; Okuonghae et al, 1992). Delayed onset (2 days) of abdominal pain and vomiting has been reported in 3 cases of ingestions of 2 to 3 cups of 100% DEG (Doyle et al, 1998).
    b) Later symptoms include back pain and severe abdominal pain (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEPATIC NECROSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Centrilobular necrosis presenting with slight jaundice and enlarged firm liver is a common finding (Geiling & Cannon, 1938).
    1) CASE SERIES: Centrilobular hepatic necrosis was found on autopsy in 7 patients with severe diethylene glycol poisoning (Drut et al, 1994).
    B) LARGE LIVER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatomegaly was reported in a large number of fatal cases of children with renal failure following ingestions of DEG adulterated acetaminophen (Hanif et al, 1995; Okuonghae et al, 1992).
    C) TOXIC HEPATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Elevated liver aminotransferases have been reported in cases of DEG adulterated acetaminophen ingestions (Scalzo A, 1996), after ingestion of DEG from other products (Morelle et al, 2010; Hasbani et al, 2005), and following dermal application, over several months, of brake fluid containing 10% DEG, to treat a "dermatitis" (Devoti et al, 2015).
    b) Hepatitis was reported as a severe effect of DEG in children given DEG-contaminated acetaminophen (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    c) Moderate elevations of aminotransferases have been reported in 3 fatalities following ingestions of 2 to 3 cups of 100% DEG as an ethanol substitute. Death was due to renal failure (Doyle et al, 1998).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man intentionally ingested 16 ounces of wallpaper stripper (26% DEG) and presented 24 hours later with nausea and vomiting, as well as an anion gap acidosis. Over the proceeding days, the patient developed renal failure, neurological deficits, and hepatocellular damage. Treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was initiated on day 2, and hepatic transaminases peaked on day 4 of NAC therapy (AST 435 Units/L, ALT 1128 Units/L). Liver function tests normalized; however, despite supportive care, the patient continued to have diminished neurological function and was dialysis dependent 6 months following the ingestion (Marraffa et al, 2008).
    3.9.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEPATIC NECROSIS
    a) CATTLE: were noted to have swollen friable liver with prominent lobular pattern at necropsy following oral exposures to 1.5 mL/kg. Histopathologic changes included centrilobular hydropic degeneration of hepatocytes (Coppock et al, 1996).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acute renal failure may be a common finding in acute ingestions (O'Brien et al, 1998; Wax, 1996; Ferrari & Giannuzzi, 2005).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old man presented with a 4-day history of nausea, general weakness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and progressive oligo-anuria after the inadvertent ingestion of a colorless, sweet-tasting beverage containing diethylene glycol 5 days before presentation. Laboratory analysis revealed acute renal failure and anion-gap metabolic acidosis with normal osmolal gap. Urinalysis showed mild proteinuria (1.5 g/day) without crystalluria and a kidney biopsy showed acute and extensive tubular injuries, without intratubular oxalate crystals. He underwent intermittent hemodialysis, however, at this time, he developed a transient increase in liver and pancreatic enzymes. He also became lethargic on day 7, and he developed peripheral facial diplegia, and flaccid tetraparesis with an acute loss of visual acuity. Following supportive care, his condition gradually improved and he was able to walk 34 days after presentation. However, on follow-up 8 months later, complete peripheral facial diplegia and a slight impairment in renal function (serum creatinine 1.7 mg/dL) were noted (Morelle et al, 2010).
    c) Rentz et al (2008) evaluated 42 case patients with acute renal failure of unknown etiology and 140 control patients matched for age, gender and admission date. Mean serum creatinine was higher in case patients compared to controls (11.1 mg/dL versus 1.4 mg/dL). The authors found a significant association between the ingestion of prescription cough syrup and illness onset (95% CI 6.93 to 138), and analysis of the suspected cough syrup showed 8% DEG contamination of the syrup and 22% DEG contamination in the glycerin used in the cough syrup preparation (Rentz et al, 2008).
    d) CASE SERIES: Sixty-four patients with liver disease were inadvertently exposed to DEG intravenously when administered DEG-contaminated (30%) armillarisin A injection. The daily exposed dose range was 3 to 6 mL, and the exposure course was 1 to 12 days. Fifteen patients developed acute renal failure, and 9 died within 2 weeks of exposure (Peng et al, 2009).
    e) CASE SERIES: Hanif et al (1995) reported a major outbreak of fatal renal failure in children in Bangladesh between January 1990 and December 1992. A significant number of these children had ingested a brand of acetaminophen containing diethylene glycol (Hanif et al, 1995).
    f) CASE SERIES: Acute renal insufficiency developed in 7 patients with fatal diethylene glycol poisoning (Drut et al, 1994).
    g) CASE SERIES: Forty-seven children died from acute renal failure within 2 weeks of admissions to the emergency department following ingestions of DEG adulterated acetaminophen in Nigeria in 1990. Clinical findings on admission included: anuria, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, seizures, tachycardia, edema, hepatomegaly, hyperkalemia, acidosis, hypoglycemia, and increased serum creatinine (Okuonghae et al, 1992).
    h) CASE SERIES: Scalzo (1996) reports children from Haiti presenting with profound renal failure and neurotoxic effects after ingesting DEG adulterated acetaminophen. One child had hydropic kidney swelling with less than 10% creatinine clearance (Scalzo, 1996).
    i) CASE SERIES: Acute renal failure was reported in 11 children (ages ranging from 7 to 42 months) following ingestion of locally prepared antipyretic medications. The daily dose ranged from 15 to 30 mL. All 11 patients also experienced encephalopathy, requiring ventilation. Eight of the 11 patients died due to worsening encephalopathy. Abnormal renal function without dialysis continued to persist in one of the 3 patients who survived. Further investigation of the antipyretic medications ingested by 6 of the 11 patients revealed that they contained acetaminophen and contaminated with diethylene glycol in amounts ranging from 2.3% to 22.3% (median 15.4% w/w) (Hari et al, 2006).
    j) CASE SERIES: O'Brien et al (1998) have identified 109 cases of anuric renal failure in children who had ingested DEG-contaminated acetaminophen. All of the children had either anuria or severe oliguria at hospital admission. Eleven of these children were lost to follow-up. Of the remainder, 88 out of 98 died, 7 recovered full renal function, and 1 child developed chronic renal failure (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    1) In the same group of patients, histopathology of kidney tissue from 4 children revealed acute tubular necrosis with regeneration consistent with a DEG toxic exposure (Anon, 1998).
    k) CASE REPORTS: Doyle et al (1998) reported the delayed onset (6 days) of acute renal failure following the ingestion of 2 to 3 cups of 100% DEG in 3 previously healthy men. Despite peritoneal dialysis, all the men died between days 9 and 18 following the ingestions. The delayed presentation was considered a major contributing factor to the fatal outcomes (Doyle et al, 1998).
    l) CASE REPORT: Following the ingestion of a solution containing diethylene glycol (28,000 mg/dL DEG [28%]; 2,500 mg/dL propylene glycol [2.5%]) and vodka, a 24-year-old man developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, encephalopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. The laboratory tests showed an increased anion gap of 20 (normal <12), mild acidosis with bicarbonate concentration of 16 (22 to 30 mmol/L), creatinine concentration of 5.9 mg/dL (0.8 to 1.3 mg/dL), elevated aminotransferases, and elevated white blood cell count with left shift. He had hemodialysis on hospital day 3 after his oliguric renal failure worsened. Perinephric stranding, bilateral cortical necrosis and patent renal vessels were observed in abdominal imaging. Renal biopsy revealed hemorrhagic cortical necrosis with widespread arterial, arteriolar, and capillary fibrin thrombi without evidence of vasculitis or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (Hasbani et al, 2005).
    m) Three patients developed severe acidemia (pH range 6.8 to 7.1 with elevated anion and osmolar gaps) and anuric acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis approximately 24 hours after the ingestion of diethylene glycol. All three patients remained hemodialysis-dependent. Renal biopsy of patient 1 revealed diffuse cortical necrosis. Renal biopsy of patient 2 revealed near total cortical necrosis (Alfred et al, 2005).
    n) Death usually occurs 2 to 7 days after onset of anuria in untreated cases (Geiling & Cannon, 1938).
    o) CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old man presented with nausea, abdominal pain, weakness, hypertension, and anuria. Laboratory results revealed severe renal failure (serum creatinine 15.5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 4.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), elevated transaminase concentrations, elevated serum lipase concentration, and metabolic acidosis. Interview of the patient's family revealed that he had been applying brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to his skin for several months to treat a "dermatitis". Despite supportive therapy, including hemodialysis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration, the patient developed progressive drowsiness, hypotension, and respiratory failure necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation. A renal biopsy was performed which indicated acute toxic proximal tubular necrosis without oxalate crystals. Over the next several days, the patient's neurologic status deteriorated with the development of ascending paralysis, areflexia, loss of corneal, vestibulo-ocular, and gag reflexes, and coma (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3). With continued supportive care, the patient's neurologic and renal function gradually improved, with normalization of renal function parameters (serum creatinine of 1.26 mg/dL and eGFR 89 mL/min/1.73) approximately 33 days post-admission. Following transfer to a rehabilitation unit and subsequent discharge 5 months later, the patient recovered neurologically, with a return in his ability to walk, speak, and hear (Devoti et al, 2015).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RENAL TUBULAR DISORDER
    a) RATS given doses greater than 10 mL/kg developed hydropic degeneration of the renal tubuli, non-compensated metabolic acidosis and uremic coma (Heilmair et al, 1993).
    b) CATTLE: exposed to 1.5 mL/kg were noted to have enlarged friable kidneys and massive perirenal edema at necropsy. Histopathologic changes included proteinaceous casts in renal tubules and significant hydropic swelling of the renal tubular epithelium (Coppock et al, 1996).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Metabolic acidosis may occur, but is not as common as with ethylene glycol (Cantarell et al, 1987; Pandya, 1988).
    b) Metabolic acidosis may accompany acute renal failure in DEG ingestions (Morelle et al, 2010; Hanif et al, 1995; Okuonghae et al, 1992; Ferrari & Giannuzzi, 2005) and following absorption after extensive dermal application of brake fluid, containing 10% diethylene glycol, to treat a "dermatitis" (Devoti et al, 2015).
    c) Three patients developed severe acidemia (pH range 6.8 to 7.1 with elevated anion and osmolar gaps) and anuric acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis approximately 24 hours after ingesting varying quantities of diethylene glycol. All three patients remained hemodialysis-dependent. On the second week postingestion, they developed significant cranial neuropathies with bulbar palsy. Approximately 24 hours postingestion, two other patients presented to the emergency department with normal renal function and a moderate acidemia (pH range 7.2 to 7.28) requiring hemodialysis (Alfred et al, 2005).
    B) ANION GAP
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Following the ingestion of 200 mL of brake fluid containing 55% triethylene glycol and 10% DEG, laboratory values in a 15-year-old girl were reported to be: plasma ethanol, 1 mmol/L; plasma lactate, 12 mmol/L; serum sodium, 139 mmol/L; serum potassium, 2.7 mmol/L; bicarbonate, 19 mmol/L; and anion gap, 27.7 mmol/L. Arterial blood gases were reported to be: pH, 7.34; pCO2, 3.99 kPa (29.9 mm Hg); pO2, 25.18 (188.9 mm Hg); HCO3, 15.8 mmol/L with FiO2, 0.5. The patient fully recovered following fomepizole (4-MP) therapy (Borron et al, 1997).
    b) Three patients developed severe acidemia (pH range 6.8 to 7.1 with elevated anion and osmolar gaps) and anuric acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis approximately 24 hours after ingesting varying quantities of diethylene glycol. All three patients remained hemodialysis-dependent (Alfred et al, 2005).
    c) CASE REPORT: Following the ingestion of a solution containing diethylene glycol (28,000 mg/dL DEG [28%]; 2,500 mg/dL propylene glycol [2.5%]) and vodka, a 24-year-old man developed nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, encephalopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. The laboratory tests showed an increased anion gap of 20 (normal <12), mild acidosis with bicarbonate concentration of 16 (normal 22 to 30 mmol/L), creatinine concentration of 5.9 mg/dL (0.8 to 1.3 mg/dL), elevated aminotransferases, and elevated white blood cell count with left shift. He had hemodialysis on hospital day 3 after his oliguric renal failure worsened (Hasbani et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old man intentionally ingested 16 ounces of wallpaper stripper (26% DEG) and presented 24 hours later with nausea and vomiting. An increased anion gap of 20 (normal <12) and acidosis with bicarbonate concentration of 17 mmol/L (normal 22 to 30 mmol/L) were evident on initial laboratory results. The patient developed renal failure, hepatocellular damage and neurologic sequelae. Despite supportive care, the patient continued to have diminished neurological function and was dialysis dependent 6 months following the ingestion (Marraffa et al, 2008).
    3.11.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) ACIDOSIS
    a) RATS: Doses of 1 and 5 mL/kg produced metabolic acidosis which was self- correcting. Doses greater than 10 mL/kg produced a non-compensated metabolic acidosis, degeneration of renal tubules, and uremic coma (Heilmair et al, 1993).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Leukocytosis is a common manifestation (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939; Hanif et al, 1995).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) SKIN IRRITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) No significant skin irritation has been described.
    B) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Carbitols which are industrial solvents derived from diethylene glycol produced a case of diffuse erythematous dermatitis in a factory worker exposed chronically (Dawson et al, 1989).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypoglycemia has been reported in children following ingestions of DEG (Okuonghae et al, 1992).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) At the time of this review, no reproductive studies were found for diethylene glycol in humans.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) When diethylene glycol was given at a dose of 5% in the diet to rats during pregnancy, there was a slight reduction in weights of the newborns, but no teratogenicity (Kawasaki, 1984).
    2) Diethylene glycol was not fetotoxic or teratogenic, nor was it maternally toxic, when given orally to pregnant rabbits at doses up to 1000 mg/kg from day 7 to 19 after insemination (Hellwig et al, 1995).
    3) Diethylene glycol given to rats resulted in specific developmental abnormalities of the musculoskeletal system and fetotoxicity (RTECS).
    4) When injected into developing chicks, diethylene glycol was toxic, but did not cause birth defects (HSDB). The implications of this study for human reproduction are unclear.
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) MICE - Doses of 6.1 grams/kg/day produced decreased numbers of litters, pups per litter, and live births (Williams et al, 1990).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS111-46-6 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) Not Listed
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) In one occupational study, there was no evidence of increased cancer in persons working with diethylene glycol for up to 9 years (Telegina, 1971).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Diethylene glycol given to rats in the diet for 2 years caused tumors (Fitzhugh & Nelson, 1946). An inhalation exposure study in mice reported mammary tumors (Sanina, 1968).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor vital signs, mental status and neurologic exam.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, glucose and bicarbonate, hepatic enzymes, and renal function.
    C) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients with metabolic acidosis.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes, blood glucose, hepatic enzymes and renal function.
    2) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients with metabolic acidosis.
    B) SERUM OSMOLALITY
    1) Ingestions of low molecular weight compounds, including alcohols and glycols, can produce a large osmolal gap, greater than 20 mOsm/L. However, a normal osmolal gap does not preclude a diagnosis of glycol toxicity. Because of DEG's higher molecular weight, it usually has a lower serum osmolality per unit concentration than several other alcohols/glycols. Elevated osmolal gap will return to normal after DEG is metabolized and/or eliminated. This normalization of anion gap is due to the formation of HEAA (Schep et al, 2009).
    a) DETERMINATION OF OSMOLAL GAP: Difference between the measured serum osmolality (using freezing point depression) and the calculated osmolality (determined by the following equation: 2 x sodium (mmol/L) + glucose (mmol/L) + BUN (blood urea nitrogen) (mmol/L) + ethanol (mmol/L). Normal: less than 10 mOsm/L) (Schep et al, 2009).
    C) ANION GAP
    1) Increased anion gap metabolic acidosis (some greater than 38 mmol/L) may occur in patients with DEG poisoning, and can usually be observed at or after 24 hours postingestion. However, a normal anion gap does not preclude a diagnosis of glycol toxicity (Schep et al, 2009).
    a) Using the formula: Anion Gap = (Na - (Cl + HCO(3))): The range for a normal anion gap reported in some laboratories is 7 +/- 4 mmol/L (Hoffman et al, 1993; Schep et al, 2009).
    D) DIAGNOSIS
    1) Although the following guideline has only been validated for ethylene glycol poisoning, it may be used to diagnose DEG toxicity: consider DEG toxicity when there is a history or suspicion of ingestion plus any two of the following parameters: arterial pH less than 7.3, serum bicarbonate less than 20 mmol/L (20 mEq/L), or osmolal gap greater than 10 mOsm/L; in addition, consider DEG toxicity when there is a history or suspicion of ingestion within the last hour and osmolal gap of greater than 10 mOsm/L; OR if metabolic acidosis and renal failure are present OR if renal failure and paralysis develop (Schep et al, 2009).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) Calcium oxalate crystals were NOT seen on autopsy in seven persons with acute diethylene glycol poisoning, in contrast to findings in ethylene glycol poisoning (Drut et al, 1994).

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Determination of diethylene glycol in wine at concentrations as low as 1 to 2 mg/L has been quantitated by gas chromatography (Lawrence et al, 1986; Caccamo et al, 1986).
    2) An HPLC method of detection in wine has also been described. Detection units of 1 mg/L can be obtained (Bayliss et al, 1988).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with symptoms (eg, CNS depression) or laboratory abnormalities (eg, metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction) should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic patients with inadvertent ingestion of a lick, sip or taste, and patients with dermal or eye exposures can be managed at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a poison center or medical toxicologist for assistance in managing patients with severe signs and symptoms. Consult a nephrologist for emergent hemodialysis in any patient with metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who have symptoms and those with larger or deliberate ingestions should be sent to a health care facility for evaluation. A 12-hour observation period is warranted with serial basic metabolic panels evaluating for evidence of metabolic acidosis or renal dysfunction.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor vital signs, mental status and neurologic exam.
    B) Monitor serum electrolytes, glucose and bicarbonate, hepatic enzymes, and renal function.
    C) Monitor arterial blood gases in patients with metabolic acidosis.
    D) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) Consider insertion of a nasogastric tube and aspiration of stomach contents after a large, recent (within an hour) ingestion. Administer activated charcoal for significant, recent ingestion.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor vital signs and mental status.
    2) Monitor serum electrolytes, glucose and bicarbonate, hepatic enzymes, and renal function.
    3) Monitor blood gases in patients with metabolic acidosis.
    4) Institute continuous cardiac monitoring and obtain an ECG.
    B) ACIDOSIS
    1) METABOLIC ACIDOSIS: Treat severe metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.1) with sodium bicarbonate, 1 to 2 mEq/kg is a reasonable starting dose(Kraut & Madias, 2010). Monitor serum electrolytes and arterial or venous blood gases to guide further therapy.
    C) FOMEPIZOLE
    1) Fomepizole (4-Methylpyrazole; 4-MP), a specific antagonist of alcohol dehydrogenase, has been used in experimental animals (with ethylene glycol toxicity) and shows promise because of its apparent low level of toxicity. Although not approved for use in DEG toxicities, it has been suggested for trials in severe acute cases with renal failure and CNS toxicities (Scalzo A, 1996; Borron et al, 1997).
    2) Fomepizole (Antizole(R); 4-MP) is available in the United States for the treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    3) DOSE
    a) An initial loading dose of 15 mg/kg is intravenously infused over 30 minutes followed by doses of 10 mg/kg/every 12 hours for 4 doses, then 15 mg/kg every 12 hours until ethylene glycol concentrations are below 20 mg/dL (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    b) HEMODIALYSIS: The frequency of dosing should be increased during dialysis. If dialysis is begun 6 hours or more since the last fomepizole dose the next scheduled dose should be administered. Dosing during dialysis should be increased to every 4 hours (Prod Info ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, 2006).
    1) If the last fomepizole dose was administered one to three hours before completion of dialysis, half of the next scheduled dose should be administered at the completion of dialysis. If the last fomepizole dose was administered more than 3 hours before completion of hemodialysis, the next scheduled dose should be administered when dialysis is completed.
    4) CASE REPORT: Following ingestion of 200 mL of brake fluid (55% TEG and 10% DEG), a 15-year-old girl was administered 600 mg (10 mg/kg body weight) of fomepizole in 250 mL NaCl over 1 hr, beginning 3 hr postingestion. This dose was repeated 2 hr later. The patient fully recovered (Borron et al, 1997).
    5) CASE REPORT: Following ingestion of brake fluid, a 17-month-old girl was given fomepizole and was treated with dialysis. A diethylene glycol concentration drawn prior to dialysis was 1.7 mg/dL (1.6 mmol/L). The patient fully recovered (Brophy et al, 2000).
    D) ETHANOL
    1) Ethanol has not been proven to be effective in the treatment of human or primate poisoning. Pretreatment with the alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor pyrazole reduces the formation of the acid metabolite and lessens toxicity in rats, suggesting that ethanol may be of some value (Wiener & Richardson, 1989). Consultation with a medical toxicologist is recommended if ethanol therapy is considered.
    2) ETHANOL/AVAILABILITY
    a) CONCENTRATIONS AVAILABLE (V/V)
    1) In the United States, 5% or 10% (V/V) ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion is no longer available commercially (Howland, 2011). Ethanol 10% (V/V) contains approximately 0.08 gram ethanol/mL.
    2) ABSOLUTE ETHANOL or dehydrated ethanol, USP contains no less than 99.5% volume/volume or 99.2% weight/weight of ethanol with a specific gravity of not more than 0.7964 at 15.56 degrees C. Absolute ethanol is hygroscopic (absorbs water from the atmosphere) and when exposed to air may be less than 99.5% ethanol by volume (S Sweetman , 2002).
    b) PREPARATION OF 10% V/V ETHANOL IN A 5% DEXTROSE SOLUTION
    1) A 10% (V/V) solution can be prepared by the following method (Howland, 2011):
    a) If available, use sterile ethanol USP (absolute ethanol). Add 55 mL of the absolute ethanol to 500 mL of 5% dextrose in water for infusion. This yields a total volume of 555 mL. This produces an approximate solution of 10% ethanol in 5% dextrose for intravenous infusion (Howland, 2011).
    3) ETHANOL/PRECAUTIONS
    a) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) Hypoglycemia may occur, especially in children. Monitor blood glucose frequently (Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    b) CONCURRENT ETHANOL
    1) If the patient concurrently has ingested ethanol, then the ethanol loading dose must be modified so that the blood ethanol level does not exceed 100 to 150 mg/dL (Barceloux et al, 2002).
    c) DISULFIRAM
    1) Fomepizole is preferred as an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor in patients taking disulfiram. If fomepizole is not available, ethanol therapy should be initiated in those patients with signs or symptoms of severe poisoning (acidemia, toxic blood level) despite a history of recent disulfiram (Antabuse(R)) ingestion.
    2) The risk of not treating these patients is excessive, especially if hemodialysis is not immediately available.
    3) Administer the ethanol cautiously with special attention to the severity of the "Antabuse reaction" (flushing, sweating, severe hypotension, and cardiac dysrhythmias).
    4) Be prepared to treat hypotension with fluids and pressor agents (norepinephrine or dopamine). Monitor ECG and vital signs carefully. Hemodialysis should be performed as soon as adequate vital signs are established, and every effort should be made to obtain fomepizole.
    4) ETHANOL/LOADING DOSE
    a) INTRAVENOUS LOADING DOSE
    1) Ethanol is given to maintain a patient’s serum ethanol concentration at 100 to 150 mg/dL. This can be accomplished by using a 5% or 10% ethanol solution administered intravenously through a central line (10% ethanol is generally preferred due to the large volumes required for 5%). Intravenous therapy dosing, which is preferred, is 0.8 g/kg as a loading dose (8 mL/kg of 10% ethanol) administered over 20 to 60 minutes as tolerated. Begin the maintenance infusion as soon as the loading dose is infused (Howland, 2011).
    b) ORAL LOADING DOSE
    1) Oral ethanol may be used as a temporizing measure until intravenous ethanol or fomepizole can be obtained, but it is more difficult to achieve the desired stable ethanol concentrations. The loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (4 mL/kg) of 20% (40 proof) ethanol diluted in juice administered orally or via a nasogastric tube(Howland, 2011).
    5) ETHANOL/MAINTENANCE DOSE
    a) MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL. Intravenous administration is preferred, but oral ethanol may be used if intravenous is unavailable(Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.8 to 1.3 mL/kg/hr)
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (1.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL*
    Non-drinker to moderate drinker80 to 130 mg/kg/hr (0.4 to 0.7 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    Chronic drinker150 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    b) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL DIALYSATE
    1) During hemodialysis maintenance doses of ethanol should be increased in accordance with the recommendation given below, or ethanol should be added to the dialysate to achieve a concentration of 100 milligrams/deciliter (Pappas & Silverman, 1982).
    c) MAINTENANCE DOSE/ETHANOL-FREE DIALYSATE
    1) Maintain a serum ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL(Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002):
    INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF 10% ETHANOL - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (2.5 to 3.5 mL/kg/hr)
    ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF 20% (40 proof) ETHANOL* - 250 to 350 mg/kg/hr (1.3 to 1.8 mL/kg/hr) orally or via nasogastric tube
    *Diluted in juice

    2) Variations in blood flow rate and the ethanol extraction efficiency of the dialyzer will affect the dialysance(McCoy et al, 1979).
    3) If the ethanol dialysance ((CL)D) is calculated, the infusion rate during dialysis (Kod) can be individually adjusted using the following expression (McCoy et al, 1979):
    Kod = Vmax x   Cp   + (CL)D x Cp
                 -------
                 Km + Cp
    where Cp = desired blood ethanol level
    *  Vmax = 175 mg/kg/hr in chronic ethanol drinkers 
    *  Vmax = 75 mg/kg/hr in non-chronic drinkers
    *  Km = 13.8 mg/dL
    

    6) ETHANOL/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) There is very little information on ethanol dosing in the pediatric patient (Barceloux et al, 2002). The loading dose and maintenance infusion should be the same as for an adult non-drinker. Loading dose is 0.8 g/kg (8 mL/kg) of 10% ethanol infused over 1 hour, maintenance dose is 80 mg/kg/hr (0.8 mL/kg/hr) of 10% ethanol (Howland, 2011).
    b) Blood ethanol concentration should be initially monitored hourly and the infusion rate should be adjusted to obtain an ethanol concentration of 100 to 150 mg/dL (Howland, 2011; Barceloux et al, 2002).
    1) Monitor blood glucose and mental status frequently during therapy (Howland, 2011). Ethanol-induced hypoglycemia is more common in children (Barceloux et al, 2002) and children may develop more significant CNS depression.
    7) ETHANOL/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    a) ETHANOL CONCENTRATION
    1) Blood ethanol concentrations should be determined every 1 to 2 hours until concentrations are maintained within the therapeutic range (100 - 150 mg/dL). Thereafter concentrations should be monitored every 2 to 4 hours. Any change in infusion rate will require monitoring every 1 to 2 hours until the therapeutic range is reached and maintained (Barceloux et al, 2002).
    b) ADDITIONAL MONITORING
    1) Monitor serum electrolytes and blood glucose, monitor for CNS depression (Howland, 2011).
    E) SEIZURE
    1) SUMMARY
    a) Attempt initial control with a benzodiazepine (eg, diazepam, lorazepam). If seizures persist or recur, administer phenobarbital or propofol.
    b) Monitor for respiratory depression, hypotension, and dysrhythmias. Endotracheal intubation should be performed in patients with persistent seizures.
    c) Evaluate for hypoxia, electrolyte disturbances, and hypoglycemia (or, if immediate bedside glucose testing is not available, treat with intravenous dextrose).
    2) DIAZEPAM
    a) ADULT DOSE: Initially 5 to 10 mg IV, OR 0.15 mg/kg IV up to 10 mg per dose up to a rate of 5 mg/minute; may be repeated every 5 to 20 minutes as needed (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info diazepam IM, IV injection, 2008; Manno, 2003).
    b) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes; up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose. May repeat dose every 5 to 10 minutes as needed (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008).
    c) Monitor for hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Consider a second agent if seizures persist or recur after repeated doses of diazepam .
    3) NO INTRAVENOUS ACCESS
    a) DIAZEPAM may be given rectally or intramuscularly (Manno, 2003). RECTAL DOSE: CHILD: Greater than 12 years: 0.2 mg/kg; 6 to 11 years: 0.3 mg/kg; 2 to 5 years: 0.5 mg/kg (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) MIDAZOLAM has been used intramuscularly and intranasally, particularly in children when intravenous access has not been established. ADULT DOSE: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 10 mg (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: INTRAMUSCULAR: 0.2 mg/kg IM, up to a maximum dose of 7 mg (Chamberlain et al, 1997) OR 10 mg IM (weight greater than 40 kg); 5 mg IM (weight 13 to 40 kg); INTRANASAL: 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg up to a maximum of 10 mg/dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Brophy et al, 2012). BUCCAL midazolam, 10 mg, has been used in adolescents and older children (5-years-old or more) to control seizures when intravenous access was not established (Scott et al, 1999).
    4) LORAZEPAM
    a) MAXIMUM RATE: The rate of intravenous administration of lorazepam should not exceed 2 mg/min (Brophy et al, 2012; Prod Info lorazepam IM, IV injection, 2008).
    b) ADULT DOSE: 2 to 4 mg IV initially; repeat every 5 to 10 minutes as needed, if seizures persist (Manno, 2003; Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC DOSE: 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IV over 2 to 5 minutes, up to a maximum of 4 mg/dose; may repeat in 5 to 15 minutes as needed, if seizures continue (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Hegenbarth & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, 2008; Sreenath et al, 2009; Chin et al, 2008).
    5) PHENOBARBITAL
    a) ADULT LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg IV at an infusion rate of 50 to 100 mg/minute IV. An additional 5 to 10 mg/kg dose may be given 10 minutes after loading infusion if seizures persist or recur (Brophy et al, 2012).
    b) Patients receiving high doses will require endotracheal intubation and may require vasopressor support (Brophy et al, 2012).
    c) PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE: 20 mg/kg may be given as single or divided application (2 mg/kg/minute in children weighing less than 40 kg up to 100 mg/min in children weighing greater than 40 kg). A plasma concentration of about 20 mg/L will be achieved by this dose (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    d) REPEAT PEDIATRIC DOSE: Repeat doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg may be given every 15 to 20 minutes if seizures persist, with cardiorespiratory monitoring (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    e) MONITOR: For hypotension, respiratory depression, and the need for endotracheal intubation (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011; Manno, 2003).
    f) SERUM CONCENTRATION MONITORING: Monitor serum concentrations over the next 12 to 24 hours. Therapeutic serum concentrations of phenobarbital range from 10 to 40 mcg/mL, although the optimal plasma concentration for some individuals may vary outside this range (Hvidberg & Dam, 1976; Choonara & Rane, 1990; AMA Department of Drugs, 1992).
    6) OTHER AGENTS
    a) If seizures persist after phenobarbital, propofol or pentobarbital infusion, or neuromuscular paralysis with general anesthesia (isoflurane) and continuous EEG monitoring should be considered (Manno, 2003). Other anticonvulsants can be considered (eg, valproate sodium, levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate) if seizures persist or recur; however, there is very little data regarding their use in toxin induced seizures, controlled trials are not available to define the optimal dosage ranges for these agents in status epilepticus (Brophy et al, 2012):
    1) VALPROATE SODIUM: ADULT DOSE: An initial dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg IV, at a rate of 3 to 6 mg/kg/minute; may give an additional dose of 20 mg/kg 10 minutes after loading infusion. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/minute (Brophy et al, 2012).
    2) LEVETIRACETAM: ADULT DOSE: 1000 to 3000 mg IV, at a rate of 2 to 5 mg/kg/min IV. PEDIATRIC DOSE: 20 to 60 mg/kg IV (Brophy et al, 2012; Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    3) LACOSAMIDE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg IV; 200 mg IV over 15 minutes (Brophy et al, 2012). PEDIATRIC DOSE: In one study, median starting doses of 1.3 mg/kg/day and maintenance doses of 4.7 mg/kg/day were used in children 8 years and older (Loddenkemper & Goodkin, 2011).
    4) TOPIRAMATE: ADULT DOSE: 200 to 400 mg nasogastric/orally OR 300 to 1600 mg/day orally divided in 2 to 4 times daily (Brophy et al, 2012).
    F) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis will improve renal failure and acid-base disturbances.
    a) CASE REPORT: Following ingestion of brake fluid, a 17-month-old girl was given fomepizole and was treated with dialysis. A diethylene glycol concentration drawn prior to dialysis was 1.7 mg/dL (1.6 mmol/L). The patient fully recovered (Brophy et al, 2000).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old man ingested an unknown amount of a 28% solution of diethylene glycol and survived after dialysis therapy (Hasbani et al, 2005a).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old man, who ingested liquid Sterno containing diethylene glycol, survived renal failure treated with dialysis, but died after 18 days from neurologic compromise (Rollins et al, 2002).
    d) CASE SERIES: Following an epidemic in Haiti involving pediatric ingestion of acetaminophen contaminated with diethylene glycol, 8 of 10 children who were transferred to the USA for dialysis survived (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    B) PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    1) CASE SERIES: Thirty-six children in India developed acute renal failure following ingestion of a cough expectorant contaminated with diethylene glycol. Despite supportive treatment and peritoneal dialysis, 33 of the 36 patients died (Singh et al, 2001).

Summary

    A) The average fatal dose is difficult to estimate. Much of the data is from historical sources or from epidemics that have occurred in patients in developing countries with limited access to medical care. Extrapolation from these sources must therefore be interpreted with caution. The average fatal dose in people who drank a sulfanilamide elixir with diethylene glycol as the vehicle was approximately 1 mL (72% concentration of DEG) per kilogram body weight. However, the actual reported fatal doses were highly variable.
    B) ADULT
    1) Three men died after consuming approximately 2 to 3 cups each of 100% diethylene glycol, as an ethanol substitute.
    2) A 56-year-old man died after ingesting 8 ounces of 100% diethylene glycol in a suicide attempt.
    3) Adults who ingested sulfanilamide contaminated with diethylene glycol survived doses of 1 to 240 milliliters (of a 72% solution).
    C) PEDIATRIC
    1) Median diethylene glycol dose that was fatal in 85 (98%) of 87 children was estimated to be 1.34 mL/kg (range 0.22 to 4.42 mL/kg). Twelve children ingested less than 1 mL/kg.
    2) Forty-nine children survived ingestion of a median dose of 0.67 mL/kg (range of 0.05 - 2.48 mL/kg) diethylene glycol present in contaminated acetaminophen syrup.

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) The acute lethal dose of diethylene glycol for humans has been estimated at approximately 1 mL/kg (Schep et al, 2009; Bingham et al, 2001).
    2) In a study of 15 victims of massive intoxication, the estimated lethal dose for humans ranged from 0.014 to 0.17 mg diethylene glycol/kg of body weight in patients who had ingested 20 mL of diethylene glycol syrup (Ferrari & Giannuzzi, 2005). However, Schep & Slaughter (2005) suggested that these estimated doses were incorrectly calculated and values that are described as mg dose per kg body weight are incorrect by a factor of 1000 (Schep & Slaughter, 2005).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) HUMAN DATA
    a) The average dose of diethylene glycol ingested by patients who died after drinking sulfanilamide with diethylene glycol as the vehicle was 1 milliliter (72% concentration of DEG) per kilogram body weight. One hundred and five out of 353 exposed persons died (Laug et al, 1939; Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).
    b) ADULT
    1) Two days after intentional ingestion of two to three cups of 100% diethylene glycol, three men (ages 21 - 35) experienced vomiting and epigastric pain. They presented to the hospital six days after the ingestion with acute renal failure. All three patients died, despite peritoneal dialysis, between days 3 and 12 following admission (Doyle et al, 1998).
    2) A 56-year-old man ingested 8 ounces of Sterno fluid (100% diethylene glycol) in an apparent suicide attempt. He developed confusion and acute kidney failure two days later, followed by ascending paralysis on day eight. Despite treatment with fomepizole and aggressive hemodialysis, he died 18 days after ingestion (Rollins et al, 2002).
    3) The fatal cumulative dose of the "elixir of sulfanilamide" manufactured by Massengill in 1937 was estimated to be approximately 20 teaspoon fulls in adults (Wax, 1996), or 1 to 2 g/kg (Schep & Slaughter, 2005).
    4) Seventy-one adults died after ingesting 20 to 240 milliliters (mean dose 99 milliliters) of diethylene glycol-containing sulfanilamide elixir (Laug et al, 1939; Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).
    5) In a study of 15 victims of massive intoxication, the estimated lethal dose for humans ranged from 0.014 to 0.17 mg diethylene glycol/kg of body weight in patients who had ingested 20 mL of diethylene glycol syrup (Ferrari & Giannuzzi, 2005). However, Schep & Slaughter (2005) suggested that these estimated doses were incorrectly calculated and values that are described as mg dose per kg body weight are incorrect by a factor of 1000 (Schep & Slaughter, 2005).
    c) PEDIATRIC
    1) In a case series, 85 (98%) of 87 children died following ingestion of diethylene glycol-contaminated paracetamol. The median estimated diethylene glycol dose ingested was 1.34 mL/kg (range of 0.22 to 4.42 mL/kg). An estimated maximum diethylene glycol dose less than 1.0 mL/kg was ingested by 12 children. Children ranged in age from 1 month to 13 years, with 80% of the children less than 5 years old (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    2) Thirty-four children died after ingesting 5 to 120 milliliters (mean dose 53 milliliters) of diethylene glycol-containing sulfanilamide elixir (Laug et al, 1939; Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).
    3) The fatal cumulative dose of the "elixir of sulfanilamide" manufactured by Massengill in 1937 was estimated to be approximately 10 teaspoon fulls in children (Wax, 1996), or 1 to 2 g/kg (Schep & Slaughter, 2005).
    4) CASE SERIES: Acute renal failure and encephalopathy, requiring ventilation, was reported in 11 children (ages ranging from 7 to 42 months) following ingestion of locally prepared antipyretic medications. The daily dose ranged from 15 to 30 mL. Despite peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, 8 of the 11 patients died due to worsening encephalopathy. Neurologic sequelae was present in the 3 patients who survived and abnormal renal function without dialysis continued to persist in one patient. Further investigation of the antipyretic medications ingested by 6 of the 11 patients revealed that they contained acetaminophen and contaminated with diethylene glycol in amounts ranging from 2.3% to 22.3% (median 15.4% w/w) (Hari et al, 2006).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL/SUMMARY
    1) Mean ingestions of 11 milligrams (range 2 to 22 milligrams), found in small quantities in polyethylene glycol (PEG) oral solutions (mean volume 2628 milliliters), have been well tolerated with no signs of renal toxicity (Woolf & Pearson, 1995).
    B) CASE REPORTS
    1) ADULT
    a) Adults who ingested sulfanilamide contaminated with diethylene glycol survived doses of 1 to 240 milliliters (72% solution) (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man presented to the emergency department approximately 8 hours after reportedly ingesting a full bottle of brake fluid, containing diethylene glycol 10% to 15%, in a suicide attempt. Other than complaining of epigastric pain, the patient was asymptomatic. His physical examination was normal, and laboratory data reported a serum bicarbonate concentration of 22 mmol/L and a serum creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL. Following an observation period, while waiting for results of his serum diethylene glycol concentration, the patient remained asymptomatic. Serial basic metabolic panels obtained and analyzed every 4 hours for the first 12 hours, then every 8 hours for the next 24 hours, demonstrated a trough serum bicarbonate concentration of 20 mmol/L and a peak serum creatinine concentration of 1 mg/dL. Seventy-two hours post-admission, his serum diethylene glycol concentration came back undetectable, and the patient was transferred to an inpatient psychiatric unit (Hoyte & Leikin, 2012).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) Children who ingested sulfanilamide contaminated with diethylene glycol survived doses of 3 to 105 milliliters (Calvery & Klumpp, 1939).
    b) A 17-month-old girl survived ingestion of diethylene glycol-containing brake fluid (total dose unknown). Following manual emesis, she was admitted to the hospital where she was administered activated charcoal and 15 mg/kg (150 mg) fomepizole, an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor, intravenously. She underwent aggressive hemodialysis, and was discharged two days later. Follow-up care has revealed no apparent sequelae (Brophy et al, 2000).
    c) A prospective cohort study followed 49 children who ingested a diethylene glycol-contaminated acetaminophen syrup at a median dose of 0.67 mL/kg (range of 0.05 - 2.48 mL/kg) diethylene glycol. None of the 49 children exhibited overt signs of diethylene glycol poisoning, and all survived through the follow-up period (median 87 days; range of 19 - 175 days) (O'Brien et al, 1998).
    3) ANIMAL DATA
    a) Rats fed 1 - 2% diethylene glycol in drinking water (duration and total dose not specified) did not experience weight loss or death as a result of exposure (Bingham et al, 2001).
    b) Rats fed diethylene glycol at 3.1 g/kg/day for 20 days were not affected (Bingham et al, 2001).
    c) The reproductive ability of rats was not affected by daily ingestion of 1 mL/kg of a 20% aqueous solution of diethylene glycol for 12 weeks (Bingham et al, 2001).
    d) No statistically significant incidence of fetal abnormalities was found in pregnant rabbits treated with up to 1000 mg/kg diethylene glycol on days 7 - 19 of gestation (Harbison, 1998).
    e) Diethylene glycol did not cause appreciable irritation when applied to the eyes of rabbits (Bingham et al, 2001).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS111-46-6 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS111-46-6 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS111-46-6 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): Not Listed
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS111-46-6 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) ANIMAL
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 9719 mg/kg -- chronic pulmonary edema; changes in kidney tubules and glomeruli; changes in spleen (RTECS, 2004)
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 2300 mg/kg -- degenerative changes to the brain and coverings; liver changes; kidney, ureter, and bladder changes (RTECS, 2004)
    b) 23,700 mg/kg -- general anesthetic effect; muscle weakness; liver changes (RTECS, 2004)
    c) 26.5 g/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    3) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) 7700 mg/kg (RTECS, 2004)
    4) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 12,000 mg/kg -- degenerative changes to the brain and coverings; liver changes; kidney, ureter, and bladder changes (RTECS, 2004)
    b) 12,565 mg/kg (RTECS, 2004)
    c) 15.6 g/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    d) 16.6 g/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    e) 20.8 g/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    5) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)RAT:
    a) 18,800 mg/kg (RTECS, 2004)
    6) TCLo- (INHALATION)MOUSE:
    a) 4 mg/m(3) for 2H/30W, intermittent -- carcinogenic; lymphomas, including Hodgkin's disease; tumors of the skin and/or appendages (RTECS, 2004)
    b) 35 mg/m(3) for 11W, intermittent -- cardiac changes; fatty liver degeneration; death (RTECS, 2004)
    7) TCLo- (INHALATION)RAT:
    a) 20 mg/m(3) for 2H/26W, intermittent -- lowered blood pressure; emphysema; death (RTECS, 2004)
    b) 20 mg/m(3) for 4H/30D, intermittent -- somnolence (general depressed activity); degenerative changes to the brain and coverings (RTECS, 2004)
    c) 35 mg/m(3) for 75D, intermittent -- changes in circulation (e.g., hemorrhage, thrombosis); liver changes; death (RTECS, 2004)
    B) HUMAN

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) SUMMARY: Diethylene glycol metabolized to 2-hydroxyethoxyacetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase oxidation, then to 2-hydroxyacetic acid (HEAA) by aldehyde dehydrogenase. HEAA causes acidosis, renal failure, and neurologic dysfunction. It is thought that the parent compound is toxic as well. Therefore, despite alcohol dehydrogenase blockade, patients may go on to develop signs of end organ toxicity (Schep et al, 2009).
    B) Insignificant increases in calcium oxalate excretion can be demonstrated in animals, but not in humans.
    1) The oxalate found in these animals may have been derived from other sources, since radiolabeled diethylene glycol was not used (Durand et al, 1976; Hebert et al, 1978).
    C) RENAL INJURY: The mechanism of renal injury is presumably different from that of ethylene glycol. It has been suggested that hygroscopic swelling of parenchymatous cells causes obstruction of the kidney tubule lumen (Geiling & Cannon, 1938).
    D) NEUROTOXICITY: 2-hydroxyethyoxyacetic acid (HEAA), the main diethylene glycol metabolite, may be the mediator of toxicity in humans. Although the exact mechanism of diethylene glycol neurotoxicity has not been described, the following are possible mechanisms for this cellular toxicity: transcellular fluid shifts, membrane destabilization through phospholipid or ion channel effects; metabolic acid-base derangements, and osmotic metabolite accumulation within cells (Alfred et al, 2005).

Physical Characteristics

    A) At room temperature, diethylene glycol is an essentially odorless, colorless, and viscous liquid, with a sweet taste and bitter aftertaste. It is extremely hygroscopic and non-corrosive (Bingham et al, 2001; Lewis, 2000; ILO ICSC, 1999; Lewis, 1998).

Molecular Weight

    A) 106.12

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) Odorless (CHRIS, 2004; Bingham et al, 2001)

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    14) AMA Department of DrugsAMA Department of Drugs: AMA Evaluations Subscription, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1992.
    15) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    16) Alfred S, Coleman P, Harris D, et al: Delayed neurologic sequelae resulting from epidemic diethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 2005; 43:155-159.
    17) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    18) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    19) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    20) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, 2nd ed, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 2001.
    21) Barceloux DG, Bond GR, Krenzelok EP, et al: American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40(4):415-446.
    22) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    23) Bayliss MAJ, Homer RB, & Shepard MJ: Determination of diethylene glycol in wine by HPLC using anthracene-9-carbonyl chloride as a derivatising agent. J Chromatogr 1988; 445:403-408.
    24) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    25) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    26) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology Vol. 7, 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001.
    27) Borron SW, Baud FJ, & Garnier R: Intravenous 4-methylpyrazole as an antidote for diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol poisoning: a case report. Vet Hum Toxicol 1997; 39:26-28.
    28) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    29) Bowie MD & McKenzie D: Diethylene glycol poisoning in children. S Afr Med J 1972; 46:931-934.
    30) Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al: Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1):3-23.
    31) Brophy PD, Tenenbein M, Gardner J, et al: Childhood diethylene glycol poisoning treated with alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor fomepizole and hemodialysis. Am J Kid Dis 2000; 35(5):958-962.
    32) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    33) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 13th ed (CD-ROM version). Merck & Co, Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ. 2001.
    34) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    35) CHRIS: CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    36) Caccamo F, Dicorcia A, & Samperi R: Determination of diethylene glycol in wine: rapid purification with a barbopack B cartridge and quantitation by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr 1986; 354:478-481.
    37) Calvery HO & Klumpp TG: The toxicity for human beings of diethylene glycol with sulfanilamide. South Med J 1939; 32:1105-1109.
    38) Cantarell MC, Fort J, & Camps J: Acute intoxication due to topical application of diethylene glycol. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:478-479.
    39) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    40) Chamberlain JM, Altieri MA, & Futterman C: A prospective, randomized study comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous diazepam for the treatment of seizures in children. Ped Emerg Care 1997; 13:92-94.
    41) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    42) Chin RF , Neville BG , Peckham C , et al: Treatment of community-onset, childhood convulsive status epilepticus: a prospective, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(8):696-703.
    43) Choonara IA & Rane A: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anticonvulsants state of the art. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 18:318-328.
    44) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    45) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Volume 2F. Toxicology, 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, pp 4657-4662.
    46) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    47) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    48) Coppock RW, Mostrom MS, & Stair EL: Toxicopathology of oilfield poisoning in cattle: a review. Vet Hum Toxicol 1996; 38:36-42.
    49) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    50) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    51) Dawson TAJ, Black RJ, & Strang WC: Delayed and immediate hypersensitivity to carbitols. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 21:52-53.
    52) Devoti E, Marta E, Belotti E, et al: Diethylene glycol poisoning from transcutaneous absorption. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65(4):603-606.
    53) Doyle CR, Win N, & Hodgman M: Diethylene glycol abuse with resultant multiple fatalities (abstract). J Tox-Clin Tox 1998; 36:516-517.
    54) Drut R, Quijano G, & Jones MC: Pathologic findings in diethylene glycol poisoning (Spanish). Medicina-Buenos Aires 1994; 54:1-5.
    55) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    56) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    57) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    58) Durand A, Auzepy P, & Hebert JL: A study of mortality and urinary excretion of oxalate in male rats following acute experimental intoxication with diethylene glycol. Eur J Intens Care Med 1976; 2:143-146.
    59) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    60) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    61) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    62) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    63) Ferrari LA & Giannuzzi L: Clinical parameters, postmortem analysis and estimation of lethal dose in victims of a massive intoxication with diethylene glycol. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 153:45-51.
    64) Fitzhugh OG & Nelson AA: Comparison of the chronic toxicity of triethylene glycol with that of diethylene glycol. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1946; 28:40-43.
    65) Geiling EM & Cannon PR: Pathologic effects of elixir of sulfanilamide (diethylene glycol) poisoning. JAMA 1938a; 111:919-926.
    66) Geiling EMK & Cannon PR: Pathologic effects of elixir of sulfanilamide (diethylene glycol) poisoning. JAMA 1938; 111:919-926.
    67) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    68) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    69) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    70) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    71) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    72) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    73) Haag HB & Ambrose AM: Studies of the physiological effect of diethylene glycol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1937; 59:93-100.
    74) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    75) Hagebusch OE: Necropsies of four patients following administration of elixir of sulfanilamide-Massengill. JAMA 1937; 109:1537-1539.
    76) Hanif M, Mobarak MR, Ronan A, et al: Fatal renal failure caused by diethylene glycol in paracetamol elixir: the Bangladesh epidemic. Br Med J 1995; 311:88-91.
    77) Harbison RD: Hamilton & Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby-Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, MO, 1998.
    78) Hari P, Jain Y, & Kabra SK: Fatal encephalopathy and renal failure caused by diethylene glycol poisoning. J Trop Pediatr 2006; 52(6):442-444.
    79) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    80) Hasbani MJ, Sansing LH, Perrone J, et al: Encephalopathy and peripheral neuropathy following diethylene glycol ingestion. Neurology 2005; 64(7):1273-1275.
    81) Hasbani MJ, Sansing LH, Perrone J, et al: Encephalopathy and peripheral neuropathy following diethylene glycol ingestion. Neurology 2005a; 64(7):1273-1275.
    82) Hebert JL, Fabre M, & Auzepy P: Acute experimental poisoning by diethylene glycol: Acid base balance and histological data in male rats. Toxicol Eur Res 1978; 1:289-294.
    83) Hegenbarth MA & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Preparing for pediatric emergencies: drugs to consider. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):433-443.
    84) Heilmair R, Lenk W, & Luhr D: Toxicokinetics of diethylene glycol (DEG) in the rat. Arch Toxicol 1993; 67:655-666.
    85) Hellwig J, Klimisch HJ, & Jackh R: Investigation of the prenatal toxicity of orally administered diethylene glycol in rabbits. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1995; 28:27-33.
    86) Herold DA, Keil K, & Bruns DE: Oxidation of polyethylene glycols by alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochem Pharmacol 1989; 38:73-76.
    87) Hoffman RS, Smilkstein MJ, & Howland MA: Osmol gaps revisited: normal values and limitations. Clin Toxicol 1993; 31:81-93.
    88) Howland MA: Ethanol. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011, pp 1419-1422.
    89) Hoyte CO & Leikin JB: Management of diethylene glycol ingestion. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2012; 50(6):525-527.
    90) Hvidberg EF & Dam M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of anticonvulsants. Clin Pharmacokinet 1976; 1:161.
    91) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    92) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    93) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    94) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    95) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    96) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    97) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    98) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    99) ILO ICSC: International Chemical Safety Card 0619: Diethylene Glycol. International Labour Organization; prepared in cooperation with the International Programme on Chemical Safety and the European Commission. Geneva, Switzerland. 1999. Available from URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safework/cis/products/icsc/dtasht/_icsc06/icsc0619.htm. As accessed 30th January, 2004.
    100) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health & Safety, 4th ed. Vol 1-4.JM Stellman (Ed), International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
    101) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    102) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    103) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    104) Kawasaki: Oyo Yakuri 1984; 27:801-807.
    105) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    106) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    107) Kraut JA & Madias NE: Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6(5):274-285.
    108) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    109) Laug EP, Calvery HO, & Morris HJ: The toxicology of some glycols and derivatives. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1939; 21:173-201.
    110) Lawrence JF, Chadha RK, & Benjamin RL: Simplified routine method for the determination of diethylene glycol in wines by capillary gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. J Chromatogr 1986; 367:213-216.
    111) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    112) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001a.
    113) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 2001.
    114) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2000.
    115) Loddenkemper T & Goodkin HP: Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; Epub:Epub.
    116) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    117) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    118) Manno EM: New management strategies in the treatment of status epilepticus. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78(4):508-518.
    119) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    120) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    121) Marraffa J, Holland MG, Stork CM, et al: Diethylene glycol: widely used solvent presents serious poisoning potential. J Emerg Med 2008; 35(4):401-406.
    122) Mathews JM, Parker MK, & Matthews HB: Metabolism and disposition of diethylene glycol in rat and dog. Drug Metab Dispos 1991; 19(6):1066-1070.
    123) McCoy HG, Cipolle RJ, & Ehlers SM: Severe methanol poisoning: application of a pharmacokinetic model for ethanol therapy and hemodialysis. Am J Med 1979; 67:804-807.
    124) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    125) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    126) Morelle J, Kanaan N, & Hantson P: The Case: Cranial nerve palsy and acute renal failure after a 'special drink'. Kidney Int 2010; 77(6):559-560.
    127) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    128) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    129) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    130) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    131) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    132) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    133) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    134) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    135) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    136) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    137) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    138) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    139) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    140) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    141) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    142) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    143) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    144) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    145) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    146) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    147) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    148) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    149) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    150) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    151) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    152) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    153) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    154) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    155) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    156) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    157) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    158) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    159) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    209) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    210) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    211) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    212) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    213) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    214) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    215) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    216) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    217) Novak LJ, Noltze K, Kent RA, et al: Acute toxicity of storm water associated with de-icing/anti-icing activities at Canadian airports. Enviro Tox Chem 2000; 19(7):1846-1855.
    218) O'Brien KL, Selanikio JD, Hecdivert C, et al: Epidemic of pediatric deaths from acute renal failure caused by diethylene glycol poisoning. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279(15):1175-1180.
    219) OHM/TADS: Oil and Hazardous Materials Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    220) Okuonghae HO, Ighogboja IS, Lawson JO, et al: Diethylene glycol poisoning in Nigerian children. Ann Trop Ped 1992; 12(3):235-238.
    221) Pandya SK: An unmitigated tragedy. Br Med J 1988; 297:117-119.
    222) Pappas SC & Silverman M: Treatment of methanol poisoning with ethanol and hemodialysis. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 126:1391-1394.
    223) Peng XM, Huang MX, Gu L, et al: Characteristics of patients with liver disease intravenously exposed to diethylene glycol in China 2006. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009; 47(2):124-131.
    224) Pfeiffer EH & Dunkelberg H: Food Cosmet Toxicol 1980; 18:115-118.
    225) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    226) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    227) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    228) Product Information: ANTIZOL(R) IV injection, fomepizole IV injection. Jazz Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Palo Alto, CA, 2006.
    229) Product Information: diazepam IM, IV injection, diazepam IM, IV injection. Hospira, Inc (per Manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    230) Product Information: lorazepam IM, IV injection, lorazepam IM, IV injection. Akorn, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 2008.
    231) RTECS: Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2004; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    232) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    233) Reddy NJ, Sudini M, & Lewis LD: Delayed neurological sequelae from ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and methanol poisonings. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2010; 48(10):967-973.
    234) Reel JR et al: GRA&I. National Technical Information Service, 1985.
    235) Rentz ED, Lewis L, Mujica OJ, et al: Outbreak of acute renal failure in Panama in 2006: a case-control study. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86(10):749-756.
    236) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    237) Rollins YD, Filley CM, McNutt JT, et al: Fulminant ascending paralysis as a delayed sequela of diethylene glycol (Sterno) ingestion. Neurology 2002; 59(9):1460-1463.
    238) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. Pharmaceutical Press. London, England (Internet Version). Edition expires 2002; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    239) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    240) Scalzo A: Clinical - Diethylene glycol (DEG). Internet Bulletin Board, (tscalzo at ssmhcs.com), 1996.
    241) Scalzo AJ: Diethylene glycol toxicity revisited - the 1996 Haitian epidemic. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:513-516.
    242) Schep LJ & Slaughter RJ: Comments on diethylene glycol concentrations. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 155(2-3):233-.
    243) Schep LJ , Slaughter RJ , Temple WA , et al: Diethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009; 47(6):525-535.
    244) Schier JG, Barr DB, Li Z, et al: Diethylene Glycol in Health Products Sold Over-the-Counter and Imported from Asian Countries. J Med Toxicol 2011; 7(1):33-38.
    245) Schuler RL: Environ Health Perspect 1984; 57:141-146.
    246) Scott R, Besag FMC, & Neville BGR: Buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for treatment of prolonged seizures in childhood and adolescence: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999; 353:623-626.
    247) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    248) Singh J, Dutta AK, Khare S, et al: Diethylene glycol poisoning in Gurgaon, India, 1998. Bull World Health Org 2001; 79(2):88 - 95.
    249) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    250) Sreenath TG, Gupta P, Sharma KK, et al: Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; Epub:Epub.
    251) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    252) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    253) Telegina KA: Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1971; 9:40-41.
    254) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    255) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    256) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    257) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    258) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    259) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    260) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    261) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    262) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    263) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    264) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    265) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    266) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    267) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    268) Verschueren K: Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. 4th ed. CD-ROM version. Wiley-Interscience. Hoboken, NJ. 2001.
    269) Wax PM: It's happening again - another diethylene glycol mass poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:517-520.
    270) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    271) Wiener HL & Richardson KE: Metabolism of diethylene glycol in male rats. Biochem Pharmacol 1989; 38:539-541.
    272) Williams J, Reel JR, & George JD: Reproductive effects of diethylene glycol and diethylene glycol monoethyl ether in Swiss CD-1 mice assessed by a continuous breeding protocol. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990; 14:622-635.
    273) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    274) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    275) Winek CL, Shingleton DP, & Shanor SP: Ethylene and diethylene glycol toxicity. Clin Toxicol 1978; 13(2):297-324.
    276) Woolf A & Pearson K: Presence of diethylene glycol in commercial polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:490.
    277) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.