6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
A) Children accidentally ingesting less than 200 mg/kg of acetaminophen or less than 150 mg/kg of salicylate can be managed at home without GI decontamination. B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002). 1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis. 2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
2) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information. 2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
A) SUMMARY 1) Activated charcoal does adsorb NAC, but there is no evidence that NAC efficacy is reduced in patients who have received charcoal.
B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) SUMMARY a) Patients with an acetaminophen/salicylate overdose should receive a full dose of activated charcoal in an attempt to ensure that the amount absorbed will be nontoxic.
2) PRESENTING AFTER EIGHT HOURS a) In patients presenting more than 8 to 12 hours after ingestion, administer a loading dose of NAC as soon as possible and discontinue if the initial level comes back below the treatment line.
3) EFFICACY a) ACETAMINOPHEN: Acetaminophen is well adsorbed by activated charcoal (Neuvonen et al ,1983; Bainbridge et al, 1977; Van de Graff et al, 1982). 1) URINARY RECOVERY: In a crossover study in 10 healthy adults, the administration of activated charcoal 120 min after ingestion of 5 grams APAP elixir reduced urinary recovery of APAP by 33% (Rose et al, 1991). 2) A retrospective review of acetaminophen overdose cases found that the administration of charcoal decreased the probability (OR 0.36) of developing a serum acetaminophen concentration requiring NAC therapy (Buckley et al, 1999).
b) SALICYLATES: Activated charcoal decreased salicylate absorption in crossover studies (Dawling et al, 1983; Eisen et al, 1991). In volunteer studies activated charcoal has been shown to be as effective (Danel et al, 1988). 4) NAC AND CHARCOAL a) CONCLUSION: There is no reason to withhold activated charcoal in a patient with acetaminophen overdose. Recent evidence suggests that activated charcoal may provide additional hepatoprotection in patients requiring NAC treatment for acetaminophen overdose. b) Studies of adsorption of NAC onto charcoal have had conflicting results (North et al, 1981; Ekins et al, 1987) (Rensi et al, 1984). c) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL HEPATOPROTECTION: In a prospective study of 122 patients with APAP overdose requiring NAC therapy, hepatotoxicity (peak SGOT greater than 125 Units/mL) developed in 4 of 82 patients receiving activated charcoal compared with 10 of 40 patients who did not receive activated charcoal (Spiller et al, 1994). Timing of the administration of activated charcoal and NAC less than or more than 2 hours apart did not affect outcome. d) PHARMACOKINETICS: While there has been a suggestion that the dose of NAC should be increased to compensate for any charcoal adsorption (Krenzelok, 1986) (Chamberlain et al, 1993), this appears to be unnecessary (Smilkstein, 1994). e) No positive relationship has been established between NAC serum concentrations and clinical effect, thus NAC/charcoal pharmacokinetic data should be applied to patient care with caution (Watson & McKinney, 1991).
5) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
6) CHARCOAL DOSE a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005). 1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS 1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information. 2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
C) MULTIPLE DOSE ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 1) SALICYLATES a) Two small case series found that salicylate intoxicated patients treated with multiple dose activated charcoal had salicylate elimination half lives that were shorter than other patients not treated with multiple (Hillman & Prescott, 1985)or shorter half lives than previously published cases (Vertrees et al, 1990). b) In a crossover study in 10 volunteers ingesting 2.88 grams acetylsalicylic acid suspension, a 9% decrease in bioavailability and an 18% decrease in urinary salicylate excretion was noted when 4 doses of 25 grams activated charcoal was administered every 2 hours beginning 4 hours postingestion (Kirshenbaum et al, 1990). 1) These authors felt that they were unable to demonstrate clinically important enhanced salicylate excretion due to multiple dose charcoal therapy in the postabsorptive phase.
c) A controlled, randomized, 3-limbed crossover study in 9 volunteers (2.88 grams acetylsalicylic acid ingested) demonstrated no decrease in AUC after administration of multiple-dose activated charcoal during the post absorptive phase; no cathartic was given (Mayer et al, 1992). d) Multiple dose vs single dose charcoal has been compared in volunteers who ingested therapeutic doses (650 mg every 4 hours x 3 days) until steady state. Multiple dose charcoal resulted in enhanced elimination during the 24 hours after absorption was complete (Yeakel et al, 1988). e) Multiple doses of activated charcoal, administered over 12 hours, did not significantly increase the elimination of intravenously administered salicylate in male rabbits (Douidar et al, 1992). f) In a crossover volunteer study the administration of three 50 gram doses of activated charcoal every 4 hours starting 1 hour after ingestion of 24 aspirin (81 mg each) decreased the urinary recovery of salicylate more than the administration of 1 or 2 doses of charcoal (Barone et al, 1988). g) Because of the lack of clear benefit the routine use of multiple dose activated charcoal is not recommended for most patients with salicylate ingestion. Salicylate has been shown to desorb from activated charcoal in vivo (Filippone et al, 1987); the administration of a second dose of charcoal is reasonable to attempt to counteract desorption. h) Salicylate absorption may be prolonged after ingestion of enteric coated or sustained release products and in patients with bezoar formation. Administration of a second dose of activated charcoal should be considered in patients with rising salicylate levels and those who have ingested enteric coated or sustained release preparations. D) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION (WBI) 1) ACETAMINOPHEN a) The effect of whole bowel irrigation (WBI) with 4 to 6 liters of polyethylene glycol solution beginning 30 minutes after ingestion of 2 or 4 grams of APAP was studied in volunteers (Hassig et al, 1993). WBI decreased peak APAP levels and area under the concentration vs time curve after ingestion of 4 grams and decreased urinary excretion of the mercapturic acid conjugate after ingestion of 2 or 4 grams. While early WBI appears to reduce APAP absorption, its role in APAP overdose is not currently defined.
2) SALICYLATES a) A crossover study in 9 volunteers (2.88 grams acetylsalicylic acid suspension ingested) failed to demonstrate any enhanced excretion of drug following whole bowel irrigation beginning 4 hours postingestion) (Mayer et al, 1992). b) In another study whole bowel irrigation was more effective in reducing salicylate absorption than single dose activated charcoal begun 4 hours after administration of enteric coated aspirin (Kirschenbaum et al, 1989). 1) WHOLE BOWEL IRRIGATION/INDICATIONS: Whole bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution appears to be a safe means of gastrointestinal decontamination. It is particularly useful when sustained release or enteric coated formulations, substances not adsorbed by activated charcoal, or substances known to form concretions or bezoars are involved in the overdose. a) Volunteer studies have shown significant decreases in the bioavailability of ingested drugs after whole bowel irrigation (Tenenbein et al, 1987; Kirshenbaum et al, 1989; Smith et al, 1991). There are no controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of whole bowel irrigation in overdose.
2) CONTRAINDICATIONS: This procedure should not be used in patients who are currently or are at risk for rapidly becoming obtunded, comatose, or seizing until the airway is secured by endotracheal intubation. Whole bowel irrigation should not be used in patients with bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, megacolon, ileus, uncontrolled vomiting, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, hemodynamic instability or inability to protect the airway (Tenenbein et al, 1987). 3) ADMINISTRATION: Polyethylene glycol balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Colyte(R), Golytely(R)) is taken orally or by nasogastric tube. The patient should be seated and/or the head of the bed elevated to at least a 45 degree angle (Tenenbein et al, 1987). Optimum dose not established. ADULT: 2 liters initially followed by 1.5 to 2 liters per hour. CHILDREN 6 to 12 years: 1000 milliliters/hour. CHILDREN 9 months to 6 years: 500 milliliters/hour. Continue until rectal effluent is clear and there is no radiographic evidence of toxin in the gastrointestinal tract. 4) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and bloating. Fluid and electrolyte status should be monitored, although severe fluid and electrolyte abnormalities have not been reported, minor electrolyte abnormalities may develop. Prolonged periods of irrigation may produce a mild metabolic acidosis. Patients with compromised airway protection are at risk for aspiration. 6.5.3) TREATMENT
A) GENERAL TREATMENT 1) ACETAMINOPHEN: The standard nomograms should be useful for mixed ASA and APAP overdose. Ingestions of mixtures of ASA and APAP or benorilate should be treated as mixed acetaminophen/salicylate ingestions. 2) Benorilate will have a slower time of onset. The enzyme that metabolizes benorilate to these compounds is an esterase. It is unknown if there is a saturation point where metabolism to acetaminophen and salicylate is slowed. It is unclear if the standard procedure for determining a toxic amount of acetaminophen will be effective. 3) BENORILATE: Acetaminophen nomogram is NOT known to be reliable. a) Benorilate has to be absorbed and converted to become acetaminophen. Although this is said to occur "rapidly", no specific time frame is available. b) In general, peak levels of acetaminophen are supposed to occur later in an ingestion and more "smoothly" (possibly a lower peak). This would have the potential to move the level (the point on the graph) to the right and down on the nomogram. c) At this time it is unclear to what extent it would move this graph point, and in what direction. A four hour level may be somewhat useful as a general range-finder of toxicity.
4) SALICYLATES: Obtain serial salicylate levels every 1 to 2 hours until concentrations have peaked and are declining; basic metabolic panel every 2 hours until clinical improvement; arterial or venous blood gas for patients undergoing urinary alkalinization or moderate/severe toxicity. In addition, obtain CBC, liver enzymes, renal function studies, INR and PTT in patients with clinical evidence of moderate/severe toxicity. 5) MULTIPLE INGESTANTS: Concomitantly ingested drugs or foods may affect gastric emptying and time to peak plasma level (Linden & Rumack, 1984). 6) DELAYED SALICYLATE TOXICITY a) An adult developed delayed salicylism 17 hours after intentionally ingesting 200 325-mg tablets. He was admitted approximately 45 minutes after exposure and was alert and oriented with some nausea. Fifty grams of activated charcoal and normal saline at 150 mL/hr were administered. An initial salicylate and acetaminophen concentrations were undetectable. Respiratory alkalosis (pH 7.47, PC02 27 mm Hg, PO2 104 mm Hg, and HCO3 20 mEq/L) was observed shortly after admission. A second salicylate level obtained at 3 hours was 33 mg/dL and 35 mg/dL at 7 hours. Following observation for 8 hours the patient was transferred to psychiatric care and was readmitted 17 hours after initial presentation with decreased mental status, diaphoresis, and tachypnia. A repeat ABG revealed a mixed metabolic gap and respiratory acidosis (pH 7.08, PCO2 30 mm Hg, and PO2 73 mm Hg, and HCO3 10 mEq/L) with a salicylate level of 128 mg/dL. The patient had a witnessed seizure and died 20 hours after exposure. Careful monitoring of serial salicylate concentrations until they are in the nontoxic range is important, as delayed absorption may produce mildly elevated salicylate concentrations and initially mild toxicity (nausea and respiratory alkalosis in this patient) that may then progress to severe intoxication (Herres et al, 2009). b) Delayed salicylate toxicity and no symptoms for the first 35 hours postingestion have been reported in one patient. The authors suggested that the delayed aspirin absorption may be due to enteric-coated or sustained-release dosage forms, salicylate-induced pylorospasm, and/or the formation of pharmacobezoars. If salicylate levels are not decreasing significantly every 4 to 6 hours, this suggests continued absorption or decreased excretion. Serial salicylate levels should be monitored until they are declining and in the nontoxic range. Treatment should not be discontinued until patients are asymptomatic (Rivera et al, 2004).
B) ACETAMINOPHEN MEASUREMENT 1) TIMING: The nomogram is used to interpret a single plasma level obtained between 4 and 24 hours after a single acute ingestion. Levels obtained before 4 hours or after 24 hours cannot be interpreted, nor can levels obtained after chronic overdose. a) Obtain a plasma acetaminophen level 4 or more hours after ingestion and plot it on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. Levels obtained prior to 4 hours may not represent peak plasma levels and CANNOT be used to predict hepatotoxicity and need for NAC therapy. Greatest accuracy is obtained with samples done between 4 and 12 hours.
2) LIQUID PREPARATION: It is recommended that acetaminophen level measurements be taken at 2 hours following ingestions of the liquid formulations, with NAC treatment if levels are at or above 225 mg/L at 2 hours (Anderson et al, 1999). 3) CO-INGESTANTS: Suicidal overdoses often involve multiple ingestions, which may alter the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen. Inaccurate histories of these overdoses are the general rule, and any patient "near" the treatment line in the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram should be treated (Clark, 1998). a) Concomitantly ingested drugs (particularly those with anticholinergic or opioid effects) or foods may affect gastric emptying and time to peak plasma level. Additional levels may be needed to determine the peak (Linden & Rumack, 1984; Tighe & Walter, 1994; Gesell & Stephan, 1996; Tsang & Nadroo, 1999).
4) CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM: Conflicting reports are found in the literature regarding whether or not a lower treatment line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram should be used for treating acute acetaminophen overdoses in chronic alcoholics. On the one hand, a review of the literature has shown in animal studies that a lower dose of acetaminophen is required to produce hepatotoxicity following chronic alcohol use due to induction of CYP enzymes and glutathione depletion. It is suggested that the animal results may apply to human cases, and some authors suggest a conservative guess of halving the dose/concentration for treatment (Buckley & Srinivasan, 2002). On the other hand, due to species differences in CYP expression, activity, and induction, results cannot always be extrapolated from animals to human cases. Also, a literature review does not conclusively substantiate that exposure to chronic excessive amounts of alcohol will predispose acetaminophen overdose patients to hepatotoxicity (Dargan & Jones, 2002). a) A number of investigators have suggested that chronic ethanol exposure increases the risk of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury. Conservative interpretation of acetaminophen levels in alcoholics has been recommended by some authors (Cheung et al, 1994; Seeff et al, 1986; Lauterburg & Velez, 1988).
5) LATE PRESENTATION a) After 24 hours postingestion, the presence of acetaminophen in the plasma may be documented, but interpretation of these levels is difficult. Because of increasing evidence of the beneficial effect of NAC instituted more than 24 hours after overdose, its use is recommended in patients presenting 24 hours or more postingestion who have measurable acetaminophen levels or biochemical evidence of hepatic injury (Parker et al, 1990; Harrison et al, 1990; Keays et al, 1991; Tucker, 1998; Buckley et al, 1999a). b) Certain serum acetaminophen assays are insensitive below 10 mcg/mL (greater than 66.16 Standard International Units (micromole/L)), rendering the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram invalid in patients who present greater than 19 hours after acetaminophen ingestion with no recordable levels. The authors recommend that these patients receive NAC therapy until 24 hours since the last acetaminophen ingestion, at which point it can be discontinued providing there is no detectable serum acetaminophen or clinical or biochemical evidence of hepatotoxicity (Donovan et al, 1999). c) In a population-based incidence and outcome study of acetaminophen poisoning, it was determined that atypical presenters, those whose risk cannot be estimated using the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, represented 44% of the hospitalized patients and 83% of those who suffered significant hepatic injury. This group represents patients with the poorest outcome (Bond & Hite, 1999). d) In late presenters following acetaminophen overdose, the best prognostic marker in established hepatotoxicity is the prothrombin time. Extended courses of NAC may be given until the prothrombin time improves (Jones, 2000).
C) ACETYLCYSTEINE 1) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE PROTOCOLS, SUMMARY a) N-acetylcysteine may be administered orally or intravenously. In patients who develop hepatic injury, NAC therapy should be continued until hepatic function improves.
2) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE, ORAL a) Patients receiving NAC therapy should meet the following criteria: 1) Plasma acetaminophen level in the potentially toxic range on the nomogram supplied with POISINDEX(R) or Mucomyst(R) package insert, OR 2) History of known or suspected acute ingestion of 10 g or 200 mg/kg or more acetaminophen if results of plasma levels cannot be obtained within 8 to 10 hours of ingestion, OR 3) In patients presenting more than 24 hours after an acute ingestion who have measurable acetaminophen levels, the use of NAC should be strongly considered.
1) TIME TO THERAPY: In patients with either a possible or probable risk for hepatotoxicity, as determined by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, NAC therapy should be initiated within 8 to 10 hours of ingestion if possible (Wolf et al, 2007). a) NAC efficacy decreased progressively from 8 to 16 hours postingestion in a study of 2540 cases of acute acetaminophen overdose (Smilkstein et al, 1988). b) Studies have shown increases in hepatotoxicity from 2% to 41% (Prescott et al, 1979) and 7 to 29% (Rumack et al, 1981) if more than a 10 hour delay to treatment occurs. Also, 4.4% to 13.2% increases in hepatotoxicity were seen if more than an 8 hour delay to treatment occurred (Smilkstein et al, 1988).
2) LOADING DOSE: Give 140 mg/kg NAC as a 5% solution. a) DILUTION: NAC is available as a 20% and 10% solution and should be diluted to 5% in a soft drink, juice, or water for oral or nasogastric administration: 3) MAINTENANCE DOSE: 70 mg/kg every 4 hours, starting 4 hours after the loading dose, for a total of 17 doses. a) DILUTION: b) If the patient weighs less than 20 kg, calculate the dose of acetylcysteine. Each mL of 20% acetylcysteine solution contains 200 mg of acetylcysteine (Prod Info acetylcysteine oral solution, solution for inhalation, 2007). c) Maintenance doses may be discontinued if the INITIAL (4-hour) acetaminophen assay reveals a nontoxic level. d) In selected patients (not actively suicidal, deemed reliable to take medication and return for liver function tests, not requiring parenteral antiemetics, and without evidence of significant hepatotoxicity), outpatient therapy with oral NAC and careful follow-up may be a reasonable alternative (Dean & Krenzelok, 1994). e) In 131 cases of confirmed toxic acetaminophen poisoning, there were 6 patients who received 4 to 6 doses of NAC during hospitalization in one center, but were discharged to home with the remaining 11 to 13 doses. Follow-up at 1 to 3 weeks post-discharge determined dosing compliance to be 83%, suggesting that self-administration of NAC in the home setting may offer an acceptable alternative (Dean et al, 1996). b) EFFERVESCENT TABLET PREPARATION 1) Effervescent tablets are for ORAL administration only; not for nebulization or intratracheal instillation (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). 2) Once the tablet is dissolved, administer immediately. Once prepared for dilution, the effervescent formulation is interchangeable with 20% acetylcysteine solution, when given at the same dosage (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). 3) ADULTS and PEDIATRICS: The recommended LOADING DOSE of this formulation is 140 mg/kg. MAINTENANCE DOSE is 70 mg/kg administered 4 hours after the loading dose, and repeated every 4 hours for a total of 17 doses (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). a) PATIENTS WEIGHING 1 TO 19 KG: Create a 50 mg/mL solution with two 2.5 gram tablets and 100 mL water and use an oral syringe to administer the appropriate dose (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). 1) LOADING DOSE: Calculate the dose by multiplying the patient's kilogram weight by 140 mg/kg and divide by the concentration (50 mg/mL) of the solution. The resulting dose is in mL for administration via an oral syringe (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). 2) MAINTENANCE DOSE: Calculate the dose by multiplying the patient's kilogram weight by 70 mg/kg and divide by the concentration (50 mg/mL) of the solution. The resulting dose is in mL for administration via an oral syringe (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
b) PATIENTS WEIGHING 20 TO 59 KG: Dissolve the tablet in 150 mL of water (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). c) PATIENTS WEIGHING 60 KG OR GREATER: Dissolve the tablet in 300 mL of water (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). d) PATIENTS WEIGHING OVER 100 KG: Limited information. No studies have been conducted to determine if dose adjustments are needed in patients weighing over 100 kg (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016). 4) PATIENTS WEIGHING 20 KG or GREATER: Dissolve the appropriate number of 2.5-gram and/or 500-mg tablets in water according to the following table (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016): 5) SODIUM CONTENT a) Cetylev(TM) tablets contain sodium, which may be a concern for patients with conditions sensitive to excess sodium intake (eg, congestive heart failure hypertension, renal impairment). The amount of sodium per tablet is as follows (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016): 1) 500 mg tablet: contains 320 mg sodium bicarbonate, of which 88 mg (3.8 mEq) is sodium. 2) 2.5 g tablet: contains 1600 mg sodium bicarbonate, of which 438 mg (19 mEq) is sodium.
c) ADVERSE EFFECTS 1) SUMMARY: Common adverse reactions to oral NAC include vomiting and diarrhea. Rarely, generalized urticaria has been described (Heard, 2008; Charley et al, 1987; Bateman et al, 1984). There is one reported case of a serum sickness-like reaction (fever, arthralgias, thrombocytopenia, and rash) temporally associated with NAC therapy and relieved with diphenhydramine and discontinuation of NAC (Mohammed et al, 1994). 2) PERSISTENT VOMITING: If any given dose is vomited within an hour of administration, the dose should be repeated. If recurrent vomiting develops, switch to the intravenous formulation. If the intravenous NAC cannot be administered, aggressive use of antiemetics is indicated for persistent vomiting, as NAC is less effective in preventing hepatotoxicity when administration is delayed. a) Make sure patient is receiving a 5% solution of NAC, not 10% or 20%. b) METOCLOPRAMIDE (Reglan(R)) 1 mg/kg intravenously or intramuscularly 30 minutes before the NAC dose (may produce extrapyramidal reactions). Intravenous doses of more than 10 mg should be diluted in 50 mL of normal saline and administered as an infusion over 15 minutes. When used with emetogenic chemotherapy doses of 1 mg/kg may be repeated every 2 hours for 2 doses and then every 3 hours for 3 doses (Prod Info REGLAN(R) intravenous, intramuscular injection, 2009). The need for continued high doses should be assessed for the individual patient. c) In adults and adolescents, prochlorperazine 10 mg intravenously (not to exceed 40 mg/day) and diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg intravenously (not to exceed 400mg/day) may be added to this regimen. d) NASOGASTRIC TUBE: Insert a nasogastric tube and infuse dose over 30 to 60 minutes. If patient vomits and tube is in stomach, pass into duodenum if possible. e) ONDANSETRON 0.15 mg/kg intravenously has also been used successfully in this setting (Tobias et al, 1992; Reed & Marx, 1994; Clark et al, 1996; Scharman, 1998). f) INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ORAL NAC: The NAC preparation used for oral administration is NOT FDA approved for intravenous administration; however, it has been administered intravenously when the intravenous NAC formulation was not available (Amirzadeh & McCotter, 2002). g) In a retrospective study of 76 patients treated intravenously with the oral NAC formulation, 4 patients (5.3%) developed mild adverse events (Yerman et al, 1995).
3) EFFICACY: Of 2540 patients treated with oral NAC, hepatotoxicity developed in 6.1% of patients with probable risk who began treatment within 10 hours of ingestion and 26.4% of those who began therapy between 10 and 24 hours following ingestion (Smilkstein et al, 1988). a) Probable risk was defined as initial plasma concentration above a line defined by 200 mcg/mL at 4 hours and 50 mcg/mL at 12 hours. b) Hepatotoxicity developed in 41% of the 283 patients who did not begin therapy until 16 to 24 hours after ingestion. c) A 7% incidence of liver damage was reported in 57 patients in whom therapy was begun within 10 hours of ingestion; a 29% incidence in 52 patients who began therapy 10 to 16 hours after ingestion; and a 62% incidence in 39 patients who began treatment 16 to 24 hours after ingestion (Rumack et al, 1981a).
3) SHORTER ORAL NAC PROTOCOL a) A shorter duration of oral NAC has been recommended for acute acetaminophen overdoses presenting within 24 hours of ingestion. Several small studies suggest that oral NAC loading dose of 140 mg/kg followed by 70 mg/kg every 4 hours until the serum acetaminophen level is no longer detectable and aminotransferase levels are normal, is safe and effective (Betten et al, 2007; Tsai et al, 2005; Woo et al, 2000; Woo et al, 1995). Because of the shorter hospitalization and associated costs, this protocol may be preferable in patients presenting soon after an acute ingestion. 1) STUDIES a) In a retrospective case series study (n=27), the efficacy of a patient-tailored NAC protocol was evaluated by comparing the incidence of hepatotoxicity in patients receiving this protocol (using the above dosing) with that in historical controls receiving 1 of 2 fixed-duration protocols (oral NAC for 72 hours and intravenous NAC for 20 hours within 8 to 10 hours of acute acetaminophen intoxication). Overall, the incidence of hepatotoxicity was low in patient-tailored NAC therapy and was comparable to that in historical controls (Tsai et al, 2005) b) In a retrospective study, 62 patients with acute acetaminophen overdose who presented within 24 hours of ingestion with normal liver function were treated with oral NAC 140-mg/kg loading dose followed by 70 mg/kg every 4 hours until the acetaminophen level was undetectable. Of these, 23 patients were treated for less than 24 hours, 17 were treated for between 24 and 36 hours and 22 were treated for between 37 and 63 hours. Five patients developed AST greater than 1000 units/L; two of these patients were treated within 10 hours of ingestion (Woo et al, 1995). c) In a prospective observational study, 250 consecutive acetaminophen overdose patients were evaluated to test the hypothesis that patients with normal AST and ALT levels determined 36 hours following the overdose do not subsequently develop liver damage with discontinuation of NAC. The average length of therapy was 36 hours, and follow-up in 90% revealed no subsequent liver damage when NAC was stopped at 36 hr (Roth et al, 1999). d) In a prospective case series (n=47) of acetaminophen toxic ingestions, all patients were treated with oral NAC for a minimum of 24 hours. In 79% of these cases (n=37), NAC was discontinued prior to 17 doses, with 49% of these patients receiving 6 NAC doses, 49% receiving 7 to 12 doses, and 3% receiving 13 to 16 doses. No adverse outcomes were reported following early NAC discontinuation (Clark et al, 2001).
4) 21-HOUR IV NAC PROTOCOL a) This is the standard FDA-approved dosing regimen used in Europe (Prescott protocol). NAC is used for prophylaxis/prevention of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury. LOADING DOSE: 150 mg/kg in 200 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 60 minutes. MAINTENANCE DOSE: 50 mg/kg in 500 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 4 hours followed by 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 16 hours (Daly et al, 2008; Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006; Prescott et al, 1979). b) Acetadote(R) is available in 30-mL (200 mg/mL) single-dose glass vials(Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006). c) In patients who develop hepatic injury secondary to acetaminophen, NAC therapy should be continued until serum acetaminophen concentration is undetectable and liver function improves (Smith et al, 2008). d) To obtain more information, you can contact Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 1-866-767-5077. e) CASE REPORT: A 78-year-old man, with a past medical history of coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency, intentionally ingested approximately 48 g of acetaminophen (ninety-six (96) 500-mg tablets) over a 1-hour period. Baseline laboratory data, on hospital admission, revealed a serum creatinine of 3.4 mg/dL, but normal liver enzyme levels (AST, 8 units/L; ALT, 22 units/L), bilirubin level, and prothrombin time (13.5 seconds). A serum acetaminophen level, obtained 2.25 hours postingestion, was 264 mcg/mL. Intravenous NAC was initiated 5 hours postingestion and continued for 21 hours. Because of normal liver enzyme and bilirubin levels, NAC was discontinued after 21 hours of therapy despite a serum acetaminophen concentration of 116 mcg/mL at the time NAC was discontinued. Intravenous NAC was restarted 24 hours later, at which time the patient's AST and ALT levels were 395 and 453 units/liter, respectively. Over the next few days, AST and ALT levels peaked at 4350 and 5621 units/L and his PT was 51.4 seconds. IV NAC was continued until normalization of lab values. The authors conclude that because of a possibility of delayed and erratic absorption following massive acetaminophen overdose ingestions, it is recommended that intravenous NAC should be continued until serum acetaminophen concentrations are undetectable and liver function improves (Smith et al, 2008). f) PEDIATRIC 1) PRECAUTIONS: Standard intravenous dosing can cause hyponatremia and seizures secondary to large amounts of free water. To avoid this complication, the manufacturer has recommended the following dosing guideline (Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006): 2) CASE REPORT: Approximately 9 hours after the initiation of 20-hour intravenous NAC therapy, a 3.5-year-old female (13 kg) with acetaminophen poisoning (level 1701 mcmol/L) developed hyponatremia (118 mmol/L) and tonic-clonic seizures; the 20-hour intravenous NAC protocol, as outlined by the manufacturer, suggested a loading dose of 11.25 mL of 20% NAC mixed with 40 mL of 5% dextrose for administration over 15 minutes and a maintenance infusion dose of 3.75 mL of NAC in 500 mL of 5% dextrose over 4 hours, followed by 7.5 mL of NAC in 1 L of 5% dextrose over 16 hours. Following supportive care, the child made a complete neurological recovery (Sung et al, 1997). 3) If the protocol were completed, this patient would have received 1540 mL of 5% dextrose over 20.25 hours. The authors recommended that if the 20-hour IV protocol is chosen, instead of using an absolute volume in which to dilute the NAC, a final concentration of 40 mg/mL (1 mL of 20% NAC with 4 mL of diluent (5% dextrose) to obtain a final volume of 5 mL with a concentration of 40 mg/mL) should be used. This process will avoid both sudden decreases in serum sodium and fluid overload in small children (Sung et al, 1997). g) ADVERSE EFFECTS 1) ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS reported to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee between January 1, 1979 and September 30, 1987 included: rash (26/30), pruritus (16/30), angioedema (9/30), nausea and vomiting (9/30), bronchospasm (8/30), tachycardia (4/30), hypotension (3/30), and hypertension (2/30). These adverse effects were also reported by the manufacturer (Prod Info Acetadote(R), 2004). 2) TIMING: Average time to onset of adverse effect following NAC infusion was 30 minutes (range, 5 to 70 minutes) (Dawson et al, 1989). The most serious adverse reactions, which are dose-related, occur during or shortly after the loading dose. Slowing the rate of the NAC infusion loading dose (give over 30 to 60 minutes) may avoid some of the adverse reactions (Buckley et al, 1999a). 3) Adverse reactions were reported in 8 of 56 (14%) Chinese patients treated with intravenous NAC by the European protocol. Rash was most likely to develop during the initial high dose infusion of NAC (6 of 7 patients with rash). One patient developed a fever (Chan & Critchley, 1994). 4) ASTHMA: Patients with asthma are considered to be at increased risk for the development of adverse reactions to intravenous NAC (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 4.7) (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2000). 5) A randomized trial, conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects following an initial NAC dose infused over a period of 60 minutes compared with an infusion period of 15 minutes in patients with acetaminophen poisoning, demonstrated that there was no significant reduction in drug-related adverse effects with the 60-minute infusion. The incidence of NAC-related adverse effects was 45% (n=109) in the 15-minute group and 38% (n=71) in the 60-minute group (Kerr et al, 2005).
h) ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS 1) Monitor closely for bronchospasm or anaphylaxis during administration of the first dose of NAC. Asthmatics appear to be more likely to develop adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, to intravenous NAC than non-asthmatics (Daly et al, 2008; Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2000). 2) Severe anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous NAC therapy following acetaminophen overdoses have been reported (Heard, 2008; Bonfiglio et al, 1992; Vale & Wheeler, 1982; Walton et al, 1979), one of which resulted in death (Anon, 1984). 3) SYMPTOMS: Includes erythematous rash, itching, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dyspnea, and tachycardia. Acute bronchospasm has been reported in 2 asthmatic patients within 15 minutes of receiving the loading dose of intravenous NAC (Ho & Beilin, 1983). Abrupt respiratory arrest occurred in one asthmatic prior to completion of her loading dose of NAC (Reynard et al, 1992). 4) INCIDENCE: In a non-randomized trial of 223 acute acetaminophen overdose patients, 32 (14.3%) experienced adverse reactions. Among the reactions, 91% were self-limited and consisted of transient erythema or mild urticaria (Smilkstein et al, 1991). 5) TREATMENT GUIDELINES: Based on a 6-year, retrospective case series of hospitalized patients with anaphylactoid reactions to NAC, Guidelines were developed for the treatment of NAC anaphylactoid reactions (Bailey & McGuigan, 1998): 1) Flushing: no treatment, continue NAC 2) Urticaria: diphenhydramine, continue NAC 3) Angioedema/respiratory symptoms: diphenhydramine, symptomatic care; stop NAC and restart 1 hr after diphenhydramine in the absence of symptoms
a) In a prospective series of 50 patients with reactions to intravenous NAC (31 cutaneous, 19 systemic) treated using these guidelines, only one patient (whose treatment deviated from the guidelines) developed a recurrence of symptoms (Bailey & McGuigan, 1998). b) Anaphylactoid reactions may occur more frequently during the initial loading dose of NAC given in the emergency department. The risk of developing an anaphylactoid reaction appears to be lower with slower initial NAC infusion rates (60-minute vs 15-minute infusion rate); however, some patients may still develop reactions. Patients may tolerate repeat dosing at slower infusion rates when symptoms resolve and following administration of an antihistamine. If IV administration of NAC cannot be tolerated, oral dosing may be necessary (Pizon & LoVecchio, 2006).
i) FACIAL FLUSHING 1) Facial or chest flushing is common, beginning 15 to 75 minutes after initiation of infusion, and is associated with peak NAC plasma concentrations of 100 to 600 mcg/L (Donovan et al, 1988).
j) PROTHROMBIN INDEX 1) A decrease in the prothrombin index (which corresponds to an increase in prothrombin time or INR) has been reported following administration of IV NAC for treatment of patients with paracetamol poisoning who did not exhibit signs of hepatocellular injury. The time of the decrease appeared to be associated with the start of the NAC infusion instead of with the ingestion of paracetamol. Because prothrombin time is measured as a prognostic indicator in patients with paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning, the concern is that the decrease in prothrombin index may be misinterpreted as a sign of liver failure. The authors conclude that patient management decisions should not be based solely on the measurement of this value (Schmidt et al, 2002a; Pol & Lebray, 2002).
k) DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA 1) Discontinue intravenous acetylcysteine if a serious adverse reaction occurs.
5) NAC IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC INJURY a) It is recommended that NAC be given to those patients who develop acetaminophen-associated hepatic failure but cannot be risk stratified by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram (Wolf et al, 2007). b) In patients with hepatotoxicity or hepatic failure prolonged courses of NAC therapy may be needed. NAC should be continued, using one of the above regimens, until clinical and biochemical markers of hepatic injury improve. 1) NAC therapy (intravenous) was shown to improve clinical outcome (progression of hepatic encephalopathy and/or fatality) when administered between 12 and 36 hours postingestion in a retrospective study of 100 patients with fulminant hepatic failure from acetaminophen overdose (Harrison et al, 1990). a) Survival was increased and the incidence of cerebral edema, fever, and hypotension decreased in a group of patients with acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure in whom intravenous NAC was started 36 to 80 hours postingestion compared with untreated controls presenting 22 to 96 hours postingestion (Keays et al, 1991a).
D) PATIENT CURRENTLY PREGNANT 1) CONCLUSION: Pregnant overdose patients with a toxic concentration of acetaminophen should be treated with NAC and delivery should not be induced in attempts to prevent fetal acetaminophen toxicity. a) In a series of 4 pregnant patients who delivered while receiving NAC therapy for acetaminophen overdose, it was found that the mean cord blood (in one case with fetal demise cardiac blood was used) NAC level at the time of delivery was 9.4 mcg/mL, which is within the range normally seen in patients receiving therapeutic NAC (Horowitz et al, 1997). Administering NAC to the mother as soon as possible after the overdose is the most effective means of preventing hepatotoxicity in mother and fetus (Riggs et al, 1989). b) NAC therapy should be continued in the infant if delivered before the mother completes the entire course of therapy. Infants born with biochemical evidence of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury should continue to receive NAC until clinical and biochemical parameters improve.
2) CASE REPORTS a) Sixty cases of acetaminophen overdose without evidence of teratogenesis have been reported. Twenty-four had serum levels above the nomogram line. Nine women had spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. One fetal death was recorded in the second and third trimesters. One third-trimester hepatotoxic patient delivered a 32 week stillborn during the course of NAC treatment. The plasma acetaminophen concentration in the stillborn was 360 mcg/mL (therapeutic range is 10 to 20 mcg/mL) and the autopsy showed massive hepatic necrosis (Riggs et al, 1989).
3) The majority of pregnancy outcomes (81%) were normal in 48 cases of acetaminophen overdose during pregnancy (McElhatton et al, 1990). 4) ANIMAL DATA: Fetal and neonatal liver cells have the ability to oxidize drugs during the first part of gestation and form reactive metabolites which could cause liver damage (Rollins et al, 1979). Therefore, the human fetus may be at risk from acetaminophen overdose. E) HEPATIC FAILURE 1) Supportive measures should be instituted in the event that signs of hepatic failure develop. NAC therapy should be continued, using one of the above regimens, until biochemical and clinical evidence of hepatic injury improves. 2) HEMOPERFUSION a) CONCLUSION: Although one study demonstrates an increased survival rate (16 of 23 patients) following early hemoperfusion, more controlled clinical studies need to be performed before this procedure can be considered a routine treatment for acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure (Gimson et al, 1982).
3) ALBUMIN DIALYSIS a) A molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), which is a modified dialysis method using an albumin-containing dialysate that is recirculated and perfused online through charcoal and anion-exchange columns, has been used following a massive acetaminophen overdose in a patient with hepatic encephalopathy (grade II), severe acidosis, INR of 7, and hepatorenal syndrome. The patient was rejected for liver transplantation. Albumin dialysis allowed time for hepatic regeneration during conventional supportive care in this case. A course of 5 consecutive 8-hour treatments was performed (McIntyre et al, 2002; Mitzner et al, 2000). b) CASE REPORT: Single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) was successfully performed on a 41-year-old woman who developed hepatic failure following an acute acetaminophen overdose. Following ICU admission (hospital day 2), the patient had fulfilled King's criteria for transplantation (pH, 7.24; INR, 7.2; model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 40); however, she was deemed unsuitable for transplantation due to psychosocial comorbidities. Approximately 10 hours post-ICU admission, the patient was started on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration for management of lactic acidosis and oliguria. On hospital day 3, SPAD was started, consisting of 14 hours/day for 4 days and 1 day of 21 hours for a total of 77 hours. Prior to SPAD, ALT and AST levels peaked at 6828 and 15,721 units/L, respectively. Following the last day of treatment, ALT and AST levels decreased to 596 and 126 units/L, respectively, and her INR was 2.1. The patient gradually recovered and was discharged 46 days post-presentation without sequelae (Karvellas et al, 2008).
4) EXTRACORPOREAL SORBENT-BASED DEVICES a) Acetaminophen-induced hepatitis or hepatic failure has been treated at 16 to 68 hours after an overdose for 4 to 6 hours with the Liver Dialysis System (a single-access hemodiabsorption system for treatment of serious drug overdose and for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy). During this treatment in 10 patients, acetaminophen levels dropped an average of 73%. If acetaminophen levels were still measurable in plasma, treatment was repeated 24 or 48 hours later. In this group, liver enzymes normalized 24 hours after the last treatment and no patient required a liver transplant. No adverse effects due to this treatment were noted (Ash et al, 2002).
5) MODULAR EXTRACORPOREAL LIVER SUPPORT a) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman, who underwent liver transplantation, developed primary nonfunctioning of the graft on postoperative day 4, with minimal bile output, discolored bile, coagulopathy, renal failure, and a grade IV coma requiring mechanical ventilation. Due to her deteriorating clinical condition, the patient was treated with modular extracorporeal liver support (MELS), consisting of a bioreactor that is charged with human liver cells and integrated into an extracorporeal circuit with continuous single pass albumin dialysis and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration. The human liver cells were obtained from a discarded cadaveric graft. After a total application time of 79 hours, the patient's plasma levels of total bilirubin and ammonia significantly decreased (21.1 mg/dL and 100 mcmol/L at start of therapy, respectively, to 10.1 mg/dL and 22.7 mcmol/L at end of therapy, respectively). Her kidney function also improved with a urine output of 1325 mL/24 hours at the end of therapy compared with 45 mL/24 hours prior to therapy, and her neurological status improved from a coma grade IV to a coma grade I allowing for extubation. On postoperative day 8, a suitable graft was found, MELS was stopped, and liver transplantation was performed. The patient's recovery was uneventful (Sauer et al, 2003). While there are currently no reports of the use of this system with acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure, it might be useful as a bridge to liver transplantation.
6) TRANSPLANTATION a) Liver transplantation has a definite but limited role in the management of patients with hepatic failure from acetaminophen toxicity (Larsen et al, 1995; Makin et al, 1995). b) Of 14 patients with poor prognosis for survival after acetaminophen overdose who were registered for transplantation, 4 of 6 (67%) survived following transplant vs 1 of 8 (12.5%) who were not transplanted. Three of 15 (20%) control patients with similar prognosis who were not registered for transplantation survived (O'Grady et al, 1991). c) In another study of 17 patients with poor prognosis referred for liver transplant, 7 of 10 patients who received a liver transplant survived compared with 1 of 7 who did not receive a transplant (Mutimer et al, 1994). d) Reliable prognostic indicators for fatal outcome are needed, since those patients who recover without transplantation have complete recoveries(Harrison et al, 1990) (Tournaul et al, 1992). e) Acidosis (pH less than 7.3), a continuing rise in prothrombin time or INR on day 4, a peak prothrombin time of 180 seconds or more, and the combination of serum creatinine greater than 300 micromoles/Liter, PT greater than 100 seconds and grade III-IV encephalopathy have all shown strong correlations with fatal outcomes in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. Assuming a standard control PT of 15 seconds, then a peak International Normalized Ratio (INR) of approximately 12 or an INR greater than approximately 6.6 presumably have the same prognostic significance (Harrison et al, 1990a; O'Grady et al, 1988; O'Grady et al, 1989; Janes & Routledge, 1992; Vale, 1992; Mutimer et al, 1994). 1) Others have not found these criteria to reliably predict fatal outcome in non-transplanted patients (Gow et al, 1997). 2) APACHE II (Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation) is a multivariant scoring system that uses a list of vital signs and laboratories as well as premorbid health and age. One study found that an admission APACHE II score of 15 or more was associated with a mortality of 13 out of 20 patients (5 of the survivors received liver transplantation) (Mitchell et al, 1998).
f) The use of arterial lactate concentration may allow for earlier identification of patients at high risk of fatal acetaminophen induced liver failure and likely to benefit from listing early for liver transplantation. 1) In a retrospective study, an initial sample of 103 patients was identified followed by a prospective validation sample of 107 patients who had been transferred to a tertiary-referral intensive care unit for acetaminophen-induced liver failure. It was found that an early arterial lactate 4 hours after transfer (median of 43 hours after ingestion) above 3.5 mmol/L correlated with an increased risk of fatal outcome (14 of 18 patients meeting this criteria died; sensitivity 67%, specificity 95%). An arterial lactate concentration 12 hours after transfer and after adequate fluid resuscitation (guided by invasive hemodynamic monitoring) above 3 mmol/L also correlated with an increased risk of fatality (16 of 18 patients meeting this criteria died; sensitivity 76% specificity 87%). All patients had intracranial pressure monitoring as appropriate; norepinephrine was used as the primary vasopressor. NAC was infused at 150 mg/kg for 24 hours and continuous venovenous hemofiltration with lactate-free fluid was used for renal replacement. The authors have proposed criteria for liver transplantation in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure as follows: 1) STRONGLY CONSIDER LISTING FOR TRANSPLANTATION IF arterial lactate concentration is greater than 3.5 mmol/L after early fluid resuscitation 2) LIST FOR TRANSPLANTATION IF arterial pH is less than 7.3 mmol/L or arterial lactate concentration is greater than 3 mmol/L after adequate fluid resuscitation 3) OR CONCURRENTLY IF serum creatinine is greater than 300 mcmol/L, INR is greater than 6.5 and there is encephalopathy of grade 3 or greater.
g) Another study has seriously questioned the King's College lactate criteria for liver transplant. In a series of 40 patients who presented with acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), 2 patients received transplants. Nine patients died overall: 1 who had received a transplant, 6 who arrived moribund or developed severe cerebral edema soon after presentation and transplantation was never feasible, and 2 died without transplantation. Non-transplant survival in patients who met one or both of the King's College lactate criteria (early lactate greater than 3.5 or post resuscitation lactate greater than 3) was 68% in these patients. In a series of 56 FHF patients from a related center, non-transplant survival in patients who met one or both of the King's College lactate criteria was 62%. The authors suggest that improvements in the management of FHF (particularly the prevention of cerebral edema) may make liver transplantation in acetaminophen-induced FHF necessary less often than previously believed (Gow et al, 2007). h) A meta-analysis was conducted that compared the different prognostic criteria that were used to determine the need for liver transplantation in patients with fulminant hepatic failure secondary to acetaminophen poisoning. The criteria that was analyzed included King's criteria (pH less than 7.3 or a combination of prothrombin time (PT) of greater than 100 sec plus creatinine of greater than 300 mcmol/L plus encephalopathy grade 3 or greater), pH less than 7.3 only, PT greater than 100 sec only, PT greater than 100 sec plus creatinine greater than 300 mcmol/L plus encephalopathy grade 3 or greater, an increase in PT day 4, factor V of less than 10%, APACHE II score of greater than 15, and Gc-globulin less than 100 mg/L. Overall, in the meta-analysis, King's criteria had moderate sensitivity at 69% (range 55% to 100%), as compared with the other criteria analyzed, but it had high specificity at 92% (range 43% to 100%). Further analysis, utilizing Q values (a Q value of 1 reflects a perfect test and a Q value of 0.5 reflects an uninformative test) showed that the ability of the King's criteria to distinguish between patients requiring transplantation and those who do not seems limited, with a Q value of 0.61. However, using likelihood ratios, as an alternative method for evaluating the accuracies of diagnostic criteria (the greater the positive likelihood ratio and the lower the negative likelihood ratio, the better the criteria), the King's criteria had a positive:negative likelihood ratio of 12.33:0.29, indicating that it is a fairly accurate prognostic indicator. In comparison, the APACHE score greater than 15 criteria had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 92% on the first day of patient's admission. The APACHE criteria also had the highest positive and lowest negative likelihood ratios of any criteria analyzed in the meta-analysis (16.4:0.19); however, the APACHE criteria was evaluated in only one study. Because there was only one study available, the authors concluded that further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of APACHE II score criteria, and in the interim, King's criteria should be used as the standard criteria, despite its moderate sensitivity (Bailey et al, 2003). i) One study found a factor V concentration of less than 10% in patients with grade 3/4 encephalopathy and a factor VIII/factor V ratio greater than 30 to correlate with fatal outcome (Pereira et al, 1992). Another study found that, in a group of patients who did not all have grade 2 or 4 encephalopathy, these markers were not useful if measured less than 72 hours after overdose (Bradberry, 1994) (Bradberry et al, 1995). j) In a retrospective study of 21 patients who underwent liver transplant for acetaminophen-induced liver failure 16 survived to 2 months and 5 did not. In survivors the time from ingestion to transplant was shorter (4 days vs. 6 days in non-survivors) and the pH at the time of transplant was higher (7.38 vs. 7.21 in non-survivors). A pH below 7.3 at transplantation had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 94% for 2-month mortality (Devlin et al, 1995). k) A model was developed, based on a prospective and validated study, to predict hepatic encephalopathy in acetaminophen overdose and to identify high-risk patients for early transfer to a liver intensive care unit/transplantation facility. The most accurate model for encephalopathy included: log10 (hours from overdose to antidote treatment), log10 (plasma coagulation factors on admission), and platelet count x hours from overdose (chi-square=41.2; p less than 0.00001). Hepatic encephalopathy was not seen in patients treated within 18 hours after overdose (Schiodt et al, 1999). l) A variety of biochemical markers (ie, hemoglobin, pyruvate, calcium, and phenylalanine levels) were identified which were combined to form a prognostic model that, when applied to patients at hospital admission, appeared to accurately predict the outcome of patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The prognostic tool was derived used a cohort of 97 patients and prospectively validated with a second cohort of 86 patients admitted to the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit for acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Hemoglobin, pyruvate, and phenylalanine levels were significantly lower in patients who either subsequently died or underwent transplantation compared with patients who spontaneously survived. This prognostic model of outcome in acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure appears to be as accurate a predictor as utilizing King's College Hospital criteria, but at an earlier stage of the patient's condition (Dabos et al, 2005). 1) Based on the prognostic model that was developed using stepwise forward logistic regression analysis the following formula was created to predict outcome: 1) (400 x pyruvate mmol/L) + (50 x phenylalanine (mmol/L) - (4 x hemoglobin g/dL)
m) PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: Based on a retrospective review of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients, the following indicators were associated with a poor prognosis and a need for liver transplantation (Mahadevan et al, 2006): 1) Delayed presentation to the emergency department 2) Delay in treatment 3) Prothrombin time greater than 100 seconds 4) Serum creatinine greater than 200 mcmol/L 5) Hypoglycemia 6) Metabolic acidosis 7) Hepatic encephalopathy grade 3 or higher
F) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME 1) CONTINUOUS HEMOFILTRATION may be preferable to intermittent hemodialysis in patients with acetaminophen induced hepatic and renal failure. Use of intermittent hemodialysis is associated with increases in intracranial pressure in these patients due to both cytotoxic and vasogenic cerebral edema. Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration was associated with a smaller increase from baseline ICP in a group of patients with acetaminophen induced hepatic and renal failure in one study (Davenport et al, 1991). 2) Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration was used in a case of acetaminophen toxicity in an alcoholic patient presenting with liver and renal failure. Oral NAC therapy was initiated. Following aggressive supportive therapy, the patient recovered (Agarwal & Farber, 2002).
G) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY 1) MANGAFODIPIR: An in vivo study, involving mice, showed that intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg of mangafodipir 2 hours prior to administration of acetaminophen increased survival rates to 67% after 24 hours compared with a survival rate of 17% after 24 hours in mice following administration of a lethal dose of acetaminophen only (1000 mg/kg). The survival rate in mice pretreated with mangafodipir was equivalent to the survival rate of mice pretreated with NAC. Curative treatment with mangafodipir administered 6 hours after administration of 1000 mg/kg of acetaminophen resulted in a survival rate of 58% as compared with NAC administration which resulted in a survival rate of 8% (Bedda et al, 2003). Mangafodipir is a contrast agent currently used in MRI of the liver. It is believed that it has antioxidant activity and can prevent mitochondrial damage induced by reactive oxygen species. 2) METHIONINE: Treatment with oral methionine has been compared with intravenous NAC and supportive care therapy in patients with acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. There is no evidence that oral methionine is more effective than IV NAC in preventing liver damage in patients with acetaminophen poisoning. However, one systematic review showed that oral methionine (2.5 grams every 4 hours for 4 doses) was more effective in preventing grade 3 hepatic necrosis (0/9 (0%)) in patients with acetaminophen poisoning compared with patients who only received supportive care (6/10 (60%)) (Buckley & Eddleston, 2004; Alsalim & Fadel, 2003). 3) Constitutive androstane receptors (CAR) INHIBITORS: CARs have been shown to be key regulators of acetaminophen metabolism and hepatotoxicity. One study of CAR-null mice and wild type mice showed that exposure to CAR activators (ie, phenobarbital) as well as high doses of acetaminophen, resulted in hepatotoxicity in the wild-type mice, but not in the CAR-null mice. The CAR-null mice appeared to be resistant to acetaminophen toxicity. Administration of a CAR inhibitor, androstanol (an inverse agonist ligand), 1 hour following acetaminophen administration was effective in preventing hepatotoxicity in the wild type mice, indicating that CAR inhibitors may be an alternative method for treating acetaminophen toxicity, although further studies are warranted (Zhang et al, 2002). 4) ANIMAL STUDY: Mice with acetaminophen-induced hepatic and renal injury, were given either NAC, orally or intraperitoneally, or ribose-cysteine, also orally or intraperitoneally, as rescue therapy, in order to determine the efficacy of thiol rescue therapy, particularly in the setting of acetaminophen-induced renal toxicity. Both treatment regimens demonstrated protection against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity, but only ribose-cysteine, administered intraperitoneally, was effective in protecting the mice against acetaminophen-induced renal toxicity as well. The authors conclude that other thiol rescue agents may have a therapeutic advantage over NAC administration in cases of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity; however, further studies are warranted (Slitt et al, 2004).
H) SALICYLATE 1) MONITORING PARAMETERS: PLASMA SALICYLATE LEVELS, serum electrolyte, arterial blood gases, CBC, PT or INR, and PTT should be monitored routinely in patients with moderate to severe symptoms. 2) FLUID REPLACEMENT: If HYDRATION is necessary, administer 88 mEq/L (2 amps) sodium bicarbonate in 0.225% NaCl (1/4 normal saline), or similarly appropriate solution. a) RATE: 10 to 15 mL/kg/hr over 1 to 2 hours until a good urine flow is obtained (at least 3 to 6 mL/kg/hr). b) Patients in shock may require more rapid fluid administration (Temple, 1981). MONITOR urine output and pH hourly.
3) FEVER: Hyperpyrexia should be treated with external cooling. Salicylates, acetaminophen and alcohol sponging are NOT recommended. 4) HYPOKALEMIA a) STAGE ONE (alkaline plasma and urine): Although serum potassium may be normal, renal excretion of potassium and bicarbonate have occurred. This is because sodium or potassium must be excreted with bicarbonate. 1) Fluid therapy may include bicarbonate and 20 milliequivalents/liter of potassium or the appropriate amount for a child.
b) STAGE TWO (plasma pH greater than 7.4 and urine pH less than 6.0): An acidic urine with alkaline plasma (paradoxical aciduria) may reflect renal intracellular hypokalemia before the plasma potassium level becomes depressed or the EKG shows changes. 1) Potassium depletion has occurred, again although plasma potassium levels may be normal. Fluid therapy may include bicarbonate and 20 to 40 milliequivalents/liter of potassium or the appropriate amount for a child.
c) STAGE THREE (acid plasma and urine): Total body potassium and bicarbonate depletion may be present, with evidence of decreased plasma potassium levels or EKG changes. 1) If the plasma potassium is normal, the patient may be dehydrated. Plasma potassium may then be low upon rehydration. Renal potassium is depleted to the point that regardless of the amount of bicarbonate administered, the urine remains acidic. 2) Severe hypokalemia, as observed when both the plasma and urine pH is acidic, may require more than 40 milliequivalents/liter of KCl in the maintenance intravenous solution, along with bicarbonate.
d) PRECAUTIONS 1) While POTASSIUM is administered, the patient should be placed on a cardiac monitor and serum potassium levels drawn frequently. Cardiac manifestations of HYPERkalemia include bradycardia, hypotension, ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest. 2) EKG manifestations include tall, peaked T waves, depressed S-T segments, and widening of the QRS complex with prolongation of the Q-T interval (sine-wave pattern). 3) HYPOKALEMIA manifests itself by progressive flattening of the T-waves and development of U-waves. 4) Potassium should be given extremely cautiously, if at all, to oliguric patients.
5) ACIDOSIS: Severe acidosis requires the administration of additional sodium bicarbonate, 1 to 2 milliequivalents/kilogram by intravenous infusion (Temple, 1981). Monitor blood gases to guide frequency and quantity of administration. 6) URINE ALKALINIZATION a) Forced diuresis, alkaline diuresis and urinary alkalinization without diuresis have all been shown to increase urinary salicylate excretion (Berg, 1977; Gordon et al, 1984; Prowse et al, 1970; Coppack & Higgins, 1984; Prescott et al, 1982). Alkalinization alone was at least as effective as forced alkaline diuresis in enhancing salicylate removal in one study (Prescott et al, 1982). Alkalinization of the urine (pH of 7.5 to 8) effectively enhances salicylate excretion, but may be difficult to achieve in severely poisoned patients because of depletion of total body potassium. b) DOSE: A solution of D5W with 132 mEq/L of bicarbonate plus 30 to 40 mEq/L of KCl should be given at a rate of 2 to 3 mL/kg/hr to produce a urine flow of 2 to 3 mL/kg/hr. Monitor serum electrolytes and urine pH every 1 to 2 hours. Adjust potassium and bicarbonate administration as needed to maintain a urine pH of 7.5 to 8. c) PRECAUTIONS: Alkaline diuresis is a potentially dangerous treatment and meticulous monitoring of urine output, pH, serum potassium, mental status, and pulmonary status must be performed. Additional potassium MAY be required if urine does not become sufficiently alkaline following the above regimen. An acidic urine with alkaline plasma may reflect intracellular hypokalemia before the plasma potassium level becomes depressed. d) STUDY: A small comparison study of 9 healthy volunteers was conducted to determine the effectiveness of urinary alkalinization and multidose activated charcoal in salicylate elimination (Ruskosky et al, 1998). Urinary alkalinization shortened half-life by 48.4% (4.741 hours) compared to control (aspirin only administration) and 42.7% (3.767 hours) compared to the activated charcoal phase. Area under the curve was also statistically less for the urinary alkalinization group compared to the control or activated charcoal group. e) PRECAUTIONS: Hypocalcemia (6.4 mg/dL) and tetany have developed with use of bicarbonate for urinary alkalinization treatment following salicylate poisoning; serum calcium was normal on admission (Fox, 1984).
7) NOT RECOMMENDED a) ACETAZOLAMIDE: Diamox(R) and TROMETHAMINE (Tham) are NOT recommended as agents to alkalinize the urine due to their adverse effect on the metabolic acid-base balance.
8) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE BALANCE a) SALICYLATES: Correct dehydration with 0.9% saline 10 to 20 mL/kg/hr over 1 to 2 hours until a good urine flow is obtained (at least 3 to 6 mL/kg/hr). In patients in whom urinary alkalinization is being considered, initial hydration may be with 10 to 20 mL/kg of D5W with 88 to 132 milliequivalents of bicarbonate added. Patients in shock may require more rapid fluid administration (Temple, 1981). b) MONITOR urine output and pH hourly. c) ACIDOSIS: Administer 1 to 2 mEq/kg NaHCO3 by intravenous bolus and begin urinary alkalinization. Monitor blood gases and urinary pH to guide frequency and quantity of administration. Patients with refractory acidosis, inability to maintain appropriate respiratory alkalosis, or acidemia should be treated with hemodialysis.
9) CONCRETION a) Serial serum salicylate levels should normally decline with therapy. If they remain relatively unchanged or increase, this may indicate a possible mass (concretion) of aspirin in the stomach. 1) The mass may be visualized by instillation of a contrast media into the stomach followed by an abdominal x-ray.
b) Surgical removal of the mass may be necessary, but enteric coated tablets sometimes can be disintegrated by using an isotonic sodium bicarbonate lavage with a pH of 8.5. c) Infusion via a nasogastric tube of 300 mL/30 min of this solution alternated with continuous suction for 30 min for 24 hours resulted in the removal of 80 enteric-coated aspirin tablets in a patient with gastric outlet obstruction (Sogge et al, 1977). 10) ACUTE LUNG INJURY a) Hemodialysis may be indicated if acute lung injury develops, as alkaline diuresis may be hazardous in this setting. b) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases. c) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011). 1) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
d) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011). e) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998). f) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995). g) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005). h) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015). 11) CEREBRAL EDEMA a) VENTILATION/MONITORING: Employ controlled hyperventilation, maintaining an arterial CO2 tension of 25 to 30 mmHg (Woster & LeBlanc, 1990). Monitor cardiovascular function, renal function, and serum electrolytes carefully (Heinemeyer, 1987). b) OSMOTIC DIURETICS: 1) MANNITOL 20%: DOSE (ADULT): 1 to 1.5 g/kg by IV infusion over 20 minutes (Heinemeyer, 1987). 2) MANNITOL 20%: DOSE (CHILDREN): 0.5 to 1 g/kg by IV infusion over 20 minutes (Heinemeyer, 1987). 3) Low dose mannitol (0.25 g/kg) has also been reported to be effective and with less incidence of dehydration and electrolyte imbalance (Marshall, 1980).
c) DEXAMETHASONE: There is controversy in the literature as to whether dexamethasone is an effective treatment for cerebral edema that is induced by other mechanisms than malignancy, and as to the appropriate dose. 1) DEXAMETHASONE LOW DOSE: 16 mg/day in divided doses (De Los Reyes et al, 1981). 2) DEXAMETHASONE HIGH DOSES: 1 to 2 mg/kg/day in divided doses (Heinemeyer, 1987).
|