MOBILE VIEW  | 

ACETAMINOPHEN-ACUTE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Acetaminophen is a frequently used drug with analgesic and antipyretic effects, which can cause severe hepatotoxicity in cases of overdose.

Specific Substances

    1) APAP
    2) 4'-Hydroxyacetanilide
    3) N-acetyl-p-aminophenol
    4) N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)acetamide
    5) Paracetamolum
    6) Paracetamol
    7) CAS 103-90-2
    8) ACETOMINOFEN (MEXICAN)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) C8H9NO2

Available Forms Sources

    A) FORMS
    1) INTRAVENOUS
    a) 10 mg/mL in a single-use 100 mL vial for injection (Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010).
    2) ORAL
    a) Capsules: 500 mg (Prod Info acetaminophen oral capsules, 2007)
    b) Liquid: 160 mg/5 mL (Prod Info CHILDREN'S SILAPAP oral liquid, 2006)
    c) Solution: 80 mg/0.8 mL, 160 mg/5 mL, 500 mg/15 mL (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) oral concentrated infant drops, 2009; Prod Info TYLENOL(R) SORE THROAT DAYTIME oral solution, 2007; Prod Info acetaminophen oral solution, 2002)
    d) Suspension: 80 mg/0.8 mL (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) INFANTS' DROPS oral suspension, 2006)
    e) Tablets: 325 mg and 500 mg; 80 mg and 160 mg (chewable); 650 mg (extended release) (McNeil-PPC, 2010; McNeil-PPC, 2010; Prod Info JR. TYLENOL(R) meltaway oral tablets, 2007; Prod Info TYLENOL(R) oral tablets, 2006; Prod Info QUICKMELTS(TM) oral tablets, 2004)
    3) RECTAL
    a) Suppository: 120 mg, 325 mg, 650 mg (Prod Info Acephen(TM) rectal suppositories, 2009; Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006; Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006a)
    B) USES
    1) Acetaminophen is an analgesic and antipyretic agent used for the treatment of mild to moderate pain and for the reduction of fever (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) oral, 2010; Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010).
    2) It is also used for moderate to severe pain in patients also receiving opioids adjunctively (Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010).
    3) Poisoning has been reported in a child who ingested a "jello" made from dissolving the contents of acetaminophen gelcaps in water (Nasir & Walburn, 1997).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Acetaminophen is a mild analgesic and antipyretic. It is available as a non-prescription single ingredient product, in many non-prescription combination products, and in prescription combination products (usually with an opioid).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: The exact mechanism of action is not known. Acetaminophen inhibits cyclooxygenase and this likely is responsible for at least some clinical effects.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In overdose, the usual metabolic pathways are overwhelmed, and acetaminophen is metabolized by CYP2E1 to a reactive metabolite. This metabolite can be detoxified by conjugation with glutathione, but when hepatic glutathione stores are depleted, the metabolite binds to macromolecules in the hepatocyte causing cell death and hepatic necrosis.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Acetaminophen overdose is very common; there are several hundred deaths from acetaminophen poisoning annually in the United States.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Adverse effects following therapeutic administration are generally rare. Some patients may have gastrointestinal upset.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: For the first day after ingestion, patients may be asymptomatic, or only develop nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Elevation of serum transaminase (ALT, AST) may begin to develop about 24 hours after ingestion and can range from mild to marked (greater than 10,000 international units/L) with few other signs or symptoms. Aminotransferase elevations generally peak 2 to 3 days after ingestion.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Liver failure, including coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy, will occur. Patients may also have renal injury. Massive overdose (initial serum concentration greater than 500 mcg/mL) can produce coma, hyperglycemia and lactic acidosis. In patients who survive the overdose, both hepatic and renal function return to normal.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Transient hypothermia has been reported following therapeutic doses of acetaminophen and overdoses.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Oral acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category B. IV acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. The combinations acetaminophen/pentazocine and butalbital/acetaminophen/caffeine/codeine phosphate have been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Acetaminophen crosses the placental barrier; fetal blood levels will probably be as high as those of the mother. Begin NAC treatment in pregnant acetaminophen overdose patients as soon as possible after the overdose. Maternal ingestion of recommended doses of acetaminophen does NOT appear to present a risk to the fetus or nursing infant. In animal fertility studies, there was an increased percentage of abnormal sperm in male offspring and a decreased number of mating pairs producing a fifth litter, which suggests the possibility of cumulative acetaminophen toxicity after chronic use of the drug near the upper limit of daily dosing. There was also evidence of reduced testicular weight, spermatogenesis, and fertility in males and reduced implantation sites in females.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Acetaminophen-containing analgesics were not associated with an increased incidence of renal, pelvis, ureter, or bladder cancer in a case-control study. In another case control study, patients who ingested acetaminophen had a decreased risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Patients who present early (within 8 hours of ingestion) only require a serum acetaminophen determination. In those patients who require acetylcysteine treatment, liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, and renal function should be monitored.
    B) Patients who present with an unknown time of ingestion or more than 8 hours after an ingestion should have a serum acetaminophen determination, electrolytes, renal function tests, liver enzymes and an INR.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) ORAL: Obtain an acetaminophen concentration, 4 hours after ingestion or as soon as possible thereafter. If the time of ingestion is known and the acetaminophen concentration is measured between 4 and 20 hours postingestion, the patient can be risk stratified using the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. If it is not possible to measure the serum acetaminophen concentration in a timely manner (results available within 2 hours), and the amount ingested is either 200 mg/kg or more, or 10 g or more, whichever is less, start treatment with acetylcysteine. Patients who have an acetaminophen above the possible toxicity line (the line starting at 150 mcg/mL at 4 hours) should be treated with acetylcysteine. Patients who present with a history suggestive of acetaminophen exposure and an unknown time of ingestion should be treated with acetylcysteine if they have a detectable serum acetaminophen concentration OR if they have elevated serum transaminases.
    a) There is some debate as to the effect of coingestion of medications that decrease gastrointestinal motility (anticholinergic and opioids) may have on the reliability of a 4-hour acetaminophen concentration for risk stratification. Some experts recommend obtaining a second acetaminophen concentration 8 hours postingestion and starting acetylcysteine if either concentration is above the possible toxicity line. Similar recommendations have been made regarding sustained-release acetaminophen products.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Patients who present late after an acute acetaminophen ingestion (greater than 36 hours) may have significant liver injury and even liver failure (INR greater than 1.5, acidosis or encephalopathy). Intubate patients with altered mental status and resuscitate hypotensive patients with crystalloid and adrenergic vasopressors. Treat coagulopathic patients who are bleeding with fresh frozen plasma. Patients with renal failure may require renal replacement therapy. Administer intravenous acetylcysteine to all patients with liver injury. Patients with hepatic encephalopathy, acidosis or significant coagulopathy (INR greater than 5) should be evaluated for liver transplantation.
    2) ORAL: Patients who present early following a massive ingestion (serum acetaminophen concentration greater than 500 mcg/mL) may have coma, metabolic acidosis, and hyperglycemia with normal serum transaminases. These patients generally recover with supportive care (airway management, fluid resuscitation) and early acetylcysteine therapy.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Consider activated charcoal in the prehospital setting if the patient is awake and can protect their airway.
    2) HOSPITAL: Administer activated charcoal for all substantial, recent ingestions if the patient is awake and can protect their airway. Retrospective data suggest that administration of activated charcoal up to 2 hours postingestion decreases the proportion of patients who will require acetylcysteine therapy.
    D) ANTIDOTE
    1) Acetylcysteine should be administered to any patient at risk for hepatic injury (either serum acetaminophen concentration above the possible toxicity line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, or history of ingesting more than 200 mg/kg or 10 g (whichever is less) and serum concentration not available or time of ingestion not known), and to patients who have hepatic injury and a history of acetaminophen overdose.
    2) ORAL: 140 mg/kg loading dose followed by 70 mg/kg every 4 hours. The FDA-approved protocol is for 72 hours (17 maintenance doses); however, many toxicologists will stop therapy early in patients who do not develop toxicity and continue therapy beyond 72 hours for patients who develop significant toxicity. Please contact your local poison center for guidance.
    3) INTRAVENOUS: 150 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes followed by 50 mg/kg infusion over 4 hours followed by 6.25 mg/kg/hour infusion. The FDA-approved protocol is for 16 hours of treatment at 6.25 mg/kg/hr (a total of 100 mg/kg). However, many toxicologists recommend checking serum transaminases and serum acetaminophen concentration prior to stopping therapy. If the transaminases are elevated or if the serum acetaminophen concentration is still detectable, the maintenance infusion is often continued until acetaminophen is not detectable and liver enzymes and INR are improving, and the patient is clinically improving. Contact your local poison center for guidance.
    4) LIVER FAILURE: Treat patients with liver failure with intravenous acetylcysteine 150 mg/kg infusion over 60 minutes followed by 50 mg/kg infusion over 4 hours followed by 6.25 mg/kg/hour infusion until resolution of encephalopathy, decreasing serum transaminase, and improving coagulopathy.
    E) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis clears acetaminophen, but it is not routinely used, since acetylcysteine is an effective antidote.
    F) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: For inadvertent ingestions in asymptomatic patients, children less than 6 years of age who have ingested less than 200 mg/kg, and all patients, 6 years or older, who have ingested less than 200 mg/kg or 10 g (whichever is less) may be managed at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: For inadvertent ingestions, children less than 6 years of age should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is 200 mg/kg or more, or if the amount ingested is unknown. For inadvertent ingestions, all patients 6 years of age or older should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is at least 200 mg/kg or 10 g, whichever is less, or the amount ingested is unknown. All patients with deliberate overdose, and all symptomatic patients, regardless of the amount ingested, should be sent to a healthcare facility. Patients who have nontoxic acetaminophen concentrations can be discharged with appropriate psychiatric care after an appropriate observation period.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients who require treatment with acetylcysteine are generally admitted to the hospital, although selected patients (presenting early with no evidence of liver injury) may be treated with acetylcysteine and managed in an emergency department observation unit. Patients with acute liver failure should be admitted to an ICU and may require transfer to a facility with liver transplant criteria.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Contact your poison center for patients who have an unknown time of ingestion, and elevated serum transaminases or a detectable serum acetaminophen concentration. Contact a liver transplant center for patients with hepatic encephalopathy, acidosis or severe coagulopathy.
    G) PITFALLS
    1) EVALUATION: Failure to determine an accurate time of ingestion can result in patients being misclassified for their risk of liver injury. Failure to consider the possible effects of anticholinergic medications or opioids on the accuracy of the 4-hour acetaminophen concentration for risk stratification.
    2) TREATMENT: Failure to decontaminate patients who are less than 2 hours post ingestion. Ending treatment for patients who have elevated transaminases or detectable serum acetaminophen concentrations.
    H) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) In general, the absorption of acetaminophen is not altered in overdose. However, coingestion of opioids and anticholinergic medications may alter the absorption of acetaminophen. Serum half-life has been used as a risk stratification tool; prolongation of the half-life to greater than 4 hours suggests that the patient is at risk for hepatic injury. The half-life of acetaminophen is also prolonged in the setting of acute liver failure.
    I) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) TOXICOLOGIC: Carbon tetrachloride, hepatotoxic mushrooms, halothane, idiosyncratic drug reactions, pennyroyal oil, iron
    2) Other causes of elevated liver enzymes: Shock liver, viral hepatitis, hepatic arterial thrombosis, hepatic venous thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, HELLP syndrome, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, obstructive disease of gallbladder or bile duct.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: ORAL: Ingestions of 200 mg/kg or 10 g, whichever is less, are considered potentially toxic. PEDIATRIC (less than 6 years of age): ORAL: For inadvertent ingestions, pediatric patients, less than 6 years of age, should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is 200 mg/kg or more, or if the amount ingested is unknown. IV: A 10 fold overdose caused hepatotoxicity in a chronically malnourished child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Oral: 650 to 1000 mg every 4 hours up to 4 g/day. IV: (50 kg or greater): 650 to 1000 mg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 4 g/day; (less than 50 kg): 12.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 3750 mg/day (75 mg/kg/day). PEDIATRIC: Oral: 10 to 15 mg/kg every 4 hours up to 60 mg/kg/day. IV: 12.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 75 mg/kg/day.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Acetaminophen is a mild analgesic and antipyretic. It is available as a non-prescription single ingredient product, in many non-prescription combination products, and in prescription combination products (usually with an opioid).
    B) PHARMACOLOGY: The exact mechanism of action is not known. Acetaminophen inhibits cyclooxygenase and this likely is responsible for at least some clinical effects.
    C) TOXICOLOGY: In overdose, the usual metabolic pathways are overwhelmed, and acetaminophen is metabolized by CYP2E1 to a reactive metabolite. This metabolite can be detoxified by conjugation with glutathione, but when hepatic glutathione stores are depleted, the metabolite binds to macromolecules in the hepatocyte causing cell death and hepatic necrosis.
    D) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Acetaminophen overdose is very common; there are several hundred deaths from acetaminophen poisoning annually in the United States.
    E) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    1) Adverse effects following therapeutic administration are generally rare. Some patients may have gastrointestinal upset.
    F) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: For the first day after ingestion, patients may be asymptomatic, or only develop nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Elevation of serum transaminase (ALT, AST) may begin to develop about 24 hours after ingestion and can range from mild to marked (greater than 10,000 international units/L) with few other signs or symptoms. Aminotransferase elevations generally peak 2 to 3 days after ingestion.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Liver failure, including coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy, will occur. Patients may also have renal injury. Massive overdose (initial serum concentration greater than 500 mcg/mL) can produce coma, hyperglycemia and lactic acidosis. In patients who survive the overdose, both hepatic and renal function return to normal.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Transient hypothermia has been reported following therapeutic doses of acetaminophen and overdoses.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HYPOTHERMIA: Transient hypothermia has been reported following therapeutic doses of acetaminophen and overdoses (Yang et al, 2001; Van Tittelboom & Govaerts-Lepicard, 1989).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ST depression and elevation and T wave inversion and flattening have been reported with acetaminophen poisoning (Will & Tomkins, 1971; Weston et al, 1976; Maclean et al, 1968; Lip & Vale, 1996). CPK elevation and pericarditis have also been reported (Weston et al, 1976; Rumack & Matthew, 1975; Maclean et al, 1968; Lip & Vale, 1996).
    b) Junctional rhythm and anterolateral T wave inversion developed in a 29-year-old man with moderate hepatotoxicity after acetaminophen ingestion (Armour & Slater, 1993).
    B) CARDIOVASCULAR FINDING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Autopsy findings have included the following:
    1) MICROSCOPIC CHANGES: Cardiac findings in fatal overdoses have included subendocardial hemorrhage (Pimstone & Uys, 1968), fatty degeneration and focal necrosis (Sanerkin, 1971).
    2) MACROSCOPIC CHANGE: In a survey of over 100 patients with fulminant hepatic failure from different causes, most patients developed cardiac dysrhythmias, but the acetaminophen group had more macroscopic changes of the heart at autopsy (Weston & Williams, 1976; Weston et al, 1976; Benson & Boleyn, 1974).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension and shock with hypothermia, in the absence of hepatic dysfunction, have been reported following acute acetaminophen overdose. The mechanism of acetaminophen-induced hypotension is unclear (Yang et al, 2001).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) In a retrospective study of 24 patients with hepatic failure following acetaminophen poisoning, 8 developed severe lung injury and 1 mild to moderate injury. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressures were normal, systemic vascular resistance was low, pulmonary artery pressure was mildly increased and pulmonary vascular resistance was low. Patients with pulmonary injury were more likely to have increased intracranial pressure and circulatory failure, had more severe hepatic coma scores on admission and had a higher mortality rate (8 of 9 (89%) vs 2 of 15 (13%)) than did patients without lung injury (Baudouin et al, 1995).
    b) CASE REPORT: Inadvertent intravenous administration of one gram of acetaminophen suspension to a 16-year-old girl resulted in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Presumably, microemboli in the pulmonary vasculature resulted in ARDS. The girl improved following heparin therapy and steroids and standard respiratory and cardiovascular support (Burmester et al, 2001).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) COMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Coma and metabolic acidosis have been reported within 3 to 4 hours of acetaminophen overdose in the absence of hepatotoxicity or co-ingestants in patients with extremely large ingestions (75 to 100 grams in adults and 10 grams in a 1-year-old and in an 18-month-old) and/or extremely high acetaminophen levels (over 800 mcg/mL at 4 to 12 hours postingestion) (Flanagan & Mant, 1986; Zezulka & Wright, 1982; Leih-Lai et al, 1984; Kadri et al, 1988; Roth et al, 1999; Koulouris et al, 1999; Yang et al, 2001; Steelman et al, 2004; Mendoza et al, 2006).
    B) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: An 11-year-old child experienced vomiting and a postural headache 2 hours after inadvertent epidural administration of 30 mL of acetaminophen over a 10-minute period instead of intravenous administration. The patient recovered 36 hours later, without sequelae, following supportive care. It is believed that the vomiting and headache may have been a result of a mechanical instead of a toxic complication. The amount of paracetamol in the epidural space filled the space quickly and increased pressure in the space internally, resulting in increased tension at the meningeal structures which had a weak point at the place of puncture of the dural tap. It is speculated that the weak point was reopened and widened, allowing cerebrospinal fluid leakage, thereby causing the headache and vomiting (Courreges, 2005).
    C) CEREBRAL EDEMA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Cerebral edema is typically present in patients who die from acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure. However, according to a retrospective analysis involving 21 patients who developed fulminant hepatic failure following fatal paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose, cerebral edema was absent in 8 patients. Further analysis of those patients showed that they were significantly older, they had a lower arterial pH on admission, there was a shorter interval between overdose and death, and there was a shorter interval between hospital admission and death compared with the patients who had cerebral edema. The cause of death in those patients without cerebral edema was primarily cardiovascular collapse with rapidly progressive refractory hypotension and/or cardiac arrest (McCormick et al, 2003).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Gastrointestinal irritability may develop immediately following ingestion or up to 12 to 24 hours later: anorexia, nausea, and vomiting may be accompanied by diaphoresis.
    b) CASE REPORT: An 11-year-old child experienced vomiting and a postural headache 2 hours after inadvertent epidural administration of 30 mL of paracetamol (acetaminophen) over a 10-minute period instead of intravenous administration. The patient recovered 36 hours later, without sequelae, following supportive care (Courreges, 2005). It is believed that the vomiting and headache may have been a result of a mechanical instead of a toxic complication. The amount of paracetamol in the epidural space filled the space quickly and increased pressure in the space internally, resulting in increased tension at the meningeal structures which had a weak point at the place of puncture of the dural tap. It is speculated that the weak point was reopened and widened, allowing cerebrospinal fluid leakage, thereby causing the headache and vomiting.
    B) ESOPHAGEAL VARICES
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Fatal hemorrhage from esophageal varices developed 13 days after acetaminophen overdose in a patient with severe hepatotoxicity (Thornton & Losowsky, 1989).
    C) PANCREATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperamylasemia and hemorrhagic pancreatitis have been reported, generally developing 2 to 3 days after acute acetaminophen overdose (Caldarola et al, 1986; Gilmore & Touvras, 1977; Coward, 1977; Mofenson et al, 1991; Yang et al, 2001). Acute pancreatitis with hyperamylasemia has been reported following acetaminophen overdose in a hemodialysis patient (Farrell & Schmitz, 1997).
    b) Hyperamylasemia was reported in 18% of 290 acetaminophen overdoses. Peak amylase levels developed 2 days after ingestion. Clinical signs of pancreatitis were often obscured by gastrointestinal symptoms and hepatitis (Hord et al, 1992).
    c) A retrospective study, conducted to determine the incidence and prognostic implications of hyperamylasemia in acetaminophen poisoning, revealed that the incidence and severity of hyperamylasemia (serum amylase level greater than 100 units/L) appeared to increase with the severity of hepatotoxicity induced by paracetamol poisoning, with hyperamylasemia occurring in 57 of 76 survivors (75%) from fulminant hepatic failure and in 61 of 72 non-survivors (85%) compared with hyperamylasemia occurring in 128 of 666 patients (19%) without fulminant hepatic failure. Fifty-five of 168 patients (33%) with a serum amylase level of greater than 150 units/L either died or underwent liver transplants compared with 17 of 646 patients (2.6%) with a serum amylase level of 150 units/L or less. Clinical acute pancreatitis was a less frequent occurrence, with only 14% of patients with paracetamol-associated hyperamylasemia having clinical evidence of pancreatitis (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2004).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LIVER DAMAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatocellular injury is reflected by a marked rise in transaminase levels. Hepatotoxicity can be severe. Laboratory abnormalities may begin to develop 24 hours after overdose and peak 3 to 4 days postingestion. Clinical signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity are usually delayed for 3 to 4 days after overdose. Dose dependent hepatic necrosis commonly presents within 2 to 4 days after a toxic dose.
    b) Vomiting, right-sided abdominal pain, and symptoms of impending hepatic coma and hypoglycemia may develop 3 to 4 days after ingestion.
    c) Elevated blood levels of liver enzymes (SGOT/ALT, SGPT/AST) may begin to develop within 24 hours after overdose and peak 2 to 3 days post ingestion. Increased total bilirubin and prolonged PT may also occur in some patients within 24 hours of acetaminophen ingestion (Singer et al, 1995).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old man intentionally ingested 15 to 25 hydrocodone/acetaminophen tablets (5 mg/500 mg) and presented to the emergency department 16 hours postingestion after experiencing persistent nausea and vomiting. His acetaminophen concentration, at the time of presentation, was less than 10 mcg/mL and his liver enzyme concentrations were normal (AST 31 units/L (reference range, 0 to 40 units/L), ALT 34 units/L (reference range, 0 to 40 units/L)). At this time, he was transferred to an inpatient psychiatric unit where he continued to experience nausea and vomiting as well as diffuse abdominal pain. Approximately 29 and 36 hours postingestion, repeat laboratory analyses revealed an acetaminophen concentration of less than 10 mcg/mL and an AST of 45 and 150, respectively, and an ALT of 61 and 204, respectively. Due to increasing transaminase concentrations and persistent nausea and abdominal pain over the next 2 days, IV NAC was administered for 16 hours. The patient's liver enzyme concentrations decreased with complete symptom resolution approximately 77 hours postingestion (Bebarta et al, 2014).
    e) CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old woman, 36 weeks pregnant, presented with vomiting, decreased fetal movements, and a small hemorrhage of 250 mL. Her medications included enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg twice daily, to treat bilateral pulmonary thromboemboli diagnosed at 28 weeks gestation, but was discontinued two days prior to presentation. Following approximately 14 hours of observation, the patient developed irregular uterine contractions and decelerations of the fetal heart rate, and an emergent cesarean section was performed. Postoperatively, the patient developed persistent tachycardia, somnolence, and nausea. Laboratory data revealed an ALT concentration of 650 International units/L (normal range, 5 to 38 international units/L), lactate dehydrogenase of 3830 International units/L (normal range, 240 to 490 international units/L), a bilirubin of 65 mcmol/L (normal range, 2 to 17 mcmol/L), and platelets of 90 x 10(9)/L. She also developed right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness. She was diagnosed with HELLP syndrome and was treated with fluid restriction and IV magnesium sulfate. Over the next several hours, her liver enzymes continued to increase, her INR was 5.8, and a serum paracetamol concentration, obtained at hospital admission, was 111 mg/L. NAC infusion was initiated, IV fluids were given, magnesium sulfate was discontinued, and the patient gradually recovered. Interview of the patient revealed that she had ingested at least 25 g paracetamol over the course of 24 to 36 hours prior to admission due to back pain and stress. Of note, the neonate also received NAC for prenatal paracetamol exposure. Laboratory tests showed an elevated bilirubin and mildly elevated transaminases but no coagulopathy (Mills et al, 2014).
    f) Most cases of acetaminophen-induced hepatic toxicity are the result of oral ingestion of acetaminophen; however, there have been cases of hepatic toxicity reported after intravenous administration of paracetamol and of propacetamol, the diethylaminoacetate ester of paracetamol (Berling et al, 2012; Horsmans et al, 1998).
    1) A 36-month-old chronically malnourished child, weighing 10 kg, developed elevated hepatic enzyme concentrations after inadvertently receiving 1500 mg (150 mg/kg) of IV paracetamol, instead of the prescribed dose of 150 mg (15 mg/kg). The patient recovered after receiving the standard dosing regimen of IV N-acetylcysteine, and was discharged 132 hours post-overdose (Berling et al, 2012).
    2) An 82-year-old woman developed severe liver toxicity after administration of therapeutic doses of propacetamol intravenously. Prolonged fasting prior to administration could have contributed to toxicity. On postmortem exam, the liver showed severe and confluent necrosis of zone 3 with little inflammation (Horsmans et al, 1998).
    g) Decreased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been found to be associated with hepatic injury following acute acetaminophen overdose in a prospective study. It is suggested that measuring serum IL-6 or C-reactive protein (a surrogate for IL-6) levels may serve as a prognostic factor in predicting hepatic injury following an acute overdose (Waksman et al, 2001).
    h) HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY (HE): A model, based on a prospective and validated study was developed to predict hepatic encephalopathy in acetaminophen overdose and to identify high-risk patients for early transfer to a liver intensive care unit/transplantation facility. The most accurate model for HE included: log10 (hours from overdose to antidote treatment), log10 (plasma coagulation factors on admission), and platelet count x hours from overdose (chi-square=41.2, p less than 0.00001). HE was not seen in patients treated within 18 hours after overdose.
    1) A good predictor of later hepatic encephalopathy also includes a total Gc-globulin level less than 120 mg/L on day 2 following acetaminophen overdose. This value was based on a prospective longitudinal study including 84 patients with acute acetaminophen overdose (Schiodt et al, 2001).
    2) The O'Grady criteria is a multivariate prognostic scoring system for predicting the need for listing a patient for liver transplantation. The criteria include: arterial blood pH less than 7.3 or H+ greater than 50 mmol/L; or, PTR greater than 100 secs and serum creatinine greater than 300 mcmol/L in patients with Grade III or IV encephalopathy. A modified O'Grady criteria states that if serum lactate is greater than 3 at 4 hours or greater than 3.5 at 12 hours (after initial fluid resuscitation), the positive predictive value of the O'Grady criteria is increased (Jones, 2002). A high APACHE II or III score may also predict the need for liver transplantation.
    i) STABLE CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE: There is no evidence that stable chronic liver disease enhances the likelihood of hepatotoxicity from therapeutic use of acetaminophen.
    1) Single doses of acetaminophen do not accumulate or produce an increase in the reactive (toxic) metabolite in these patients, although half life is slightly longer (Andreasen & Hutters, 1979; Forrest et al, 1979; Neuberger et al, 1980; Benson, 1983b).
    2) Cytochrome P-450 levels are not increased and may actually be decreased in severe liver disease or viral hepatitis.
    j) ETHANOL (ACUTE or CHRONIC): In a case series of 645 patients with single-dose acetaminophen poisoning, time to initiation of NAC therapy was the most important predictor of the degree of liver injury. In a multivariate analysis, chronic alcohol abuse was an independent factor for mortality and the development of hepatic encephalopathy. Acute alcohol ingestion in chronic alcohol abusers had a protective effect against hepatic encephalopathy. In patients who were not alcohol abusers and either took an acute alcohol ingestion or did not take any alcohol, only a nonsignificant trend toward a protective effect of acute alcohol ingestion was shown (Schmidt et al, 2002). Therapeutic doses of acetaminophen do not appear to cause hepatotoxicity in chronic alcoholics (Rumack, 2002).
    1) A retrospective analysis of patients who developed hepatotoxicity following acetaminophen overdose revealed that the co-ingestion of ethanol in patients who were not alcoholics was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of hepatotoxicity. However, the risk of hepatotoxicity increased in alcoholics who had not co-ingested ethanol at the time of acetaminophen overdose, although, in those patients, co-ingestion of ethanol significantly reduced the risk of hepatotoxicity (Sivilotti et al, 2005).
    2) A randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine the effects of paracetamol on the hepatic enzyme concentrations of chronic alcohol abusers. Adult alcohol abusers with a current drinking episode of at least 7 consecutive days received either paracetamol 4 g/day for 5 days (n=74), or a placebo (n=68). Measurement of the hepatic enzyme concentrations showed that the mean changes of ALT concentrations between the paracetamol and placebo groups were significantly different (p=0.04), with the mean change in serum ALT activity from baseline to day 7 as 11.7 international units/L (95%, CI 4.9, 18.6) and 1.8 international units/L (95% CI -4.8, 8.5), respectively. The maximum ALT concentrations were 238 and 249 international units/L in the paracetamol and placebo groups, respectively. However, the mean change in the serum AST, of the paracetamol group, from baseline to day 7 was -9 international units/L (95% CI -17.3, -0.6) as compared to the placebo group with a mean change of -17.3 international units/L (95% CI -23.4, -11.1; p=0.113). Based on the results of this study, administration of therapeutic doses of paracetamol appear to be safe in newly abstinent chronic alcohol abusers (Dart et al, 2010).
    k) TOBACCO USE: According to a retrospective study, conducted to evaluate the effects of tobacco use on morbidity and mortality from paracetamol-induced hepatic failure, tobacco use is an independent risk factor for the development of severe hepatotoxicity, acute liver failure, and death following paracetamol overdose (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2003).
    l) AGE: A retrospective study evaluating age as a risk factor for fulminant hepatic failure and death in patients with paracetamol poisoning, determined that 40 years of age or older is considered a significant independent risk factor for the development of fulminant hepatic failure and death in patients following paracetamol overdose. However, a comparison of data showed that in the patients who were 40 years of age or older, the quantity of paracetamol taken was greater (500 mg/kg vs 448 mg/kg, respectively), the time to presentation at the hospital was greater (24 hours vs 19 hours), and the time before receiving NAC therapy was greater (30 hours vs 20 hours) compared with the patients who were less than 40 years of age, all of which may have been contributing factors to the incidence and severity of hepatotoxicity (Schmidt, 2005).
    m) OBESITY: A morbidly obese 31-year-old woman (202 kg; BMI 62.1) presented to the hospital approximately 40 minutes after an acute ingestion of several medications (amounts unknown), including acetaminophen, aspirin, cephalexin, cetirizine, ibuprofen, prednisone, and a vitamin supplement. Four hours after ingestion, her serum acetaminophen level was 109.2 mcg/mL, her liver enzyme levels were normal (AST 28 units/L, ALT 48 units/L) and her INR was 1.2. At this time, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was not administered based on the Rumack nomogram. The next day, her liver enzymes increased (AST 2067 units/L, ALT 897 units/L), indicating acute liver injury, and treatment was initiated with IV NAC. Although the patient admitted to drinking 3 alcoholic beverages daily, other causes for the liver injury were ruled out. Repeat lab studies revealed severe hepatocellular injury, with peak AST and ALT levels of 22,760 units/L and 8249 units/L, respectively, as well as grade 2 encephalopathy, acidosis (lactate 6.5 mmol/L), coagulopathy (INR 6.9), renal insufficiency (serum creatinine 2.2 mg/dL), and hypoglycemia (glucose 45 mg/dL). With continued supportive therapy and administration of NAC, the patient recovered without requiring transplantation (Lavonas et al, 2015)
    1) With obesity, the volume of distribution of acetaminophen on a per kg basis is less compared to non-obese people, although the calculated total body burden is more. Obesity can also prolong the time to peak acetaminophen concentration. It is suggested that a more conservative approach in risk estimation may be necessary in this patient population (Lavonas et al, 2015).
    2) PEDIATRIC
    a) SUMMARY: Children are less likely to develop toxic acetaminophen levels or hepatotoxicity after single acute ingestions than are adults or adolescents.
    1) Rarely, pediatric hepatotoxicity has been reported with acetaminophen doses less than 150 mg/kg per day (Hynson & South, 1999).
    b) ACUTE OVERDOSE - Of 417 pediatric acetaminophen overdoses, 55 (13%) had toxic plasma levels, resulting in hepatotoxicity (SGOT greater than 1000 International Units/L) in only 3 (5.5%). A comparison with 639 adult cases showed toxic levels in 23.2% and hepatotoxicity in 29% of those (Rumack, 1984).
    c) Pediatric overdose case presentations were found to have high transaminase levels and liver synthetic failure with disproportionately low total bilirubin levels (less than 200 mcmols/liter) compared with patients with other causes of fulminant hepatic failure. These patients also presented with a non-specific prodromal illness, often with fasting and/or vomiting (Miles et al, 1999).
    d) Increased glutathione turnover rate in children may result in greater detoxification of acetaminophen (Rumore & Blaiklock, 1992).
    e) INCIDENCE OF TOXICITY: Adolescents are 6 times more likely to develop liver damage and 2 times more likely to develop potentially toxic levels than children less than 6 years old (Rumack, 1986; Rumore & Blaiklock, 1992).
    f) RISK FACTORS: The following are potential risk factors for hepatocellular damage in pediatric acetaminophen overdose (Alander et al, 2000):
    1) Emergency department presentation longer than 24 hr after ingestion
    2) Age 10 to 17 years
    3) Intentional overdoses
    4) Doses greater than 150 mg/kg
    5) Caucasian race
    g) CO-INGESTION OF ETHANOL: Ethanol co-ingestion resulted in significantly lower peak SGOT values in a series of 417 children overdosed with acetaminophen and who had toxic acetaminophen levels (Rumack, 1984).
    h) PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS
    1) PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: Based on a retrospective review of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients, the following indicators were associated with a poor prognosis and a need for liver transplantation (Mahadevan et al, 2006):
    1) Delayed presentation to the emergency department
    2) Delay in treatment
    3) Prothrombin time greater than 100 seconds
    4) Serum creatinine greater than 200 mcmol/L
    5) Hypoglycemia
    6) Metabolic acidosis
    7) Hepatic encephalopathy grade III or higher

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) ACUTE INGESTION: Acute renal failure has been described in 0.4% to 4% of patients, usually associated with hepatic injury (Prescott & Critchley, 1983; Prescott et al, 1982; Mour et al, 2005; Monteagudo & Folb, 1987; Chan et al, 1995; Brotodihardjo et al, 1992; Katzir et al, 1995; Eguia & Materson, 1997; Alkhuja et al, 2001), but may be 10% or greater in selected groups of patients with severe overdose (Prescott & Critchley, 1983; McClain et al, 1988).
    b) Patients developing renal failure are more likely to have fatal overdoses than those who do not (Harrison et al, 1990a; O'Grady et al, 1988; Makin et al, 1995).
    c) Isolated renal impairment, including acute tubular necrosis, without severe hepatotoxicity has been reported (Kher & Makker, 1987; Campbell & Baylis, 1992; Curry et al, 1982; Jeffery & Cafferty, 1981; Davenport & Finn, 1988; Pillans & Hall, 1985; Eguia & Materson, 1997).
    d) Acute renal failure with moderate hepatocellular damage has been reported following acetaminophen overdose in a chronic alcoholic (Akca et al, 1999).
    e) Back pain, proteinuria, and hematuria may occur 36 to 48 hours post-ingestion and are reported to herald renal failure (Prescott et al, 1982).
    f) In a retrospective series of 36 patients with acute renal failure after acetaminophen overdose, the onset of acute renal failure was generally within 2 to 5 days of overdose and serum creatinine peaked 3 to 16 days after overdose (Eguia & Materson, 1997).
    g) Non-oliguric acute tubular necrosis as a cause of acute renal failure, and associated with hepatotoxicity (without liver failure), has been reported in a 19-year-old following an overdose of 42.5 grams of acetaminophen. The patient survived following NAC and supportive therapy (Alkhuja et al, 2001).
    h) Nephrotoxicity without hepatotoxicity has been associated with the presence of glutathione S-transferase-u isoenzyme (Koppel et al, 1992; Koppel et al, 1995).
    i) INCIDENCE (ADOLESCENTS): In a clinical trial, there was an incidence of 8.9% acetaminophen-induced nephrotoxicity following acute severe poisoning in adolescents (n=45). No obvious predictors of nephrotoxicity were apparent in this case series (Boutis & Shannon, 2001).
    j) A retrospective analysis of 17 patients with renal insufficiency following acetaminophen overdose showed that severe nephrotoxicity occurred following low-dose intoxications of acetaminophen (6 patients ingested 5000 mg), indicating that there may have been other contributing factors for the development of nephrotoxicity (ie, other nephrotoxic drugs, dehydration, preexisting renal insufficiency). In less than one-third of the patients, nephrotoxicity also occurred without the development of hepatotoxicity; in the majority of patients, nephrotoxicity resolved without dialysis (vonMach et al, 2005).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Metabolic acidosis has been reported within 3 to 4 hours of acetaminophen overdose in the absence of hepatotoxicity or co-ingestants, in these situations:
    1) Extremely large ingestions (75 to 100 grams in adults and 10 grams in a 1-year-old boy and in an 18-month-old girl) (Steelman et al, 2004).
    2) Extremely high plasma acetaminophen levels (over 800 mcg/mL at 4 to 12 hours postingestion) resulting in severe anion gap metabolic acidosis (Flanagan & Mant, 1986; Zezulka & Wright, 1982; Leih-Lai et al, 1984; Gray et al, 1987a; Roth et al, 1999; Koulouris et al, 1999; Yang et al, 2001). Decreased level of consciousness or coma is usually present in these cases.
    3) CASE REPORT (CHILD): An 18-month-old girl developed metabolic acidosis, altered mental status, and respiratory failure after ingesting twenty (20) 500-mg acetaminophen capsules (total dose, 10 grams). A venous blood gas showed a pH of 7.14, partial venous CO2 of 35, and a base excess of -17. Her anion gap was normal. A 4-hour acetaminophen level was 1010 mcg/mL. The patient recovered, without sequelae, 18 hours after admission following administration of NAC and sodium bicarbonate (Steelman et al, 2004).
    4) CASE REPORT (CHILD): A 27-month-old child developed somnolence and vomiting after ingesting an unknown amount of acetaminophen. An initial arterial blood gas measurement revealed metabolic acidosis (pH, 7.32: pCO2, 34.5; pO2, 347; CO3, 17.3 mEq/L). The first serum acetaminophen level, obtained 2.5 hours after onset of symptoms, was 804 mcg/mL. Her liver function was normal. The patient recovered uneventfully following administration of NAC (Mendoza et al, 2006).
    b) Other causes of acidosis should be ruled out.
    B) LACTIC ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) LACTATE: There may be a correlation between elevated plasma lactate concentrations and elevated plasma acetaminophen concentrations on admission (Gray et al, 1987).
    b) Higher arterial lactate concentrations are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with acetaminophen induced acute liver failure (Schmidt & Larsen, 2006).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) THROMBOCYTOPENIC DISORDER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Thrombocytopenia has developed 10 to 48 hours after ingestion in several patients (Monteagudo & Folb, 1987; Thornton & Losowsky, 1990; Fischereder & Jaffe, 1994).
    B) METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acetaminophen, unlike phenacetin, does NOT cause methemoglobin formation (Rumack & Matthew, 1975).
    C) PANCYTOPENIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pancytopenia has been reported following acute acetaminophen overdose in adults and children, but is not a common overdose manifestation (Yang et al, 2001).
    b) CASE REPORT: Pancytopenia was reported in a 3.5-year-old child after she received 325 mg of acetaminophen every 2 hours for 48 hours (Douidar et al, 1994).
    D) PROTHROMBIN TIME ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Following acetaminophen overdoses, isolated small rises in prothrombin time are common, and often occur in the absence of hepatotoxicity (Steelman et al, 2004; Whyte et al, 1999). INR may be increased in acetaminophen poisonings without hepatic damage and appears to be due to inhibition of vitamin K-dependent activation of coagulation factors (Whyte et al, 2000; Whyte et al, 1999a).
    E) LEUKEMOID REACTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old woman presented with hepatotoxicity after ingesting a total of 12 grams of acetaminophen over 2 days. She developed a reactive plasmacytosis with thrombocytosis and life-threatening agranulocytosis, followed by a leukemoid reaction (Gursoy et al, 1996).
    F) HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Acetaminophen overdose patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency may be more susceptible to hemolysis from oxidative stress effects on erythrocytes or to reactive neutrophilia caused by liver damage (Sklar, 2002; Kent et al, 2001).
    b) CASE REPORT: Hemolytic anemia was reported in an African-American boy with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency after an acute overdose of an unknown quantity of acetaminophen; acetaminophen level 6 hours post ingestion was 680 mcg/mL. Hemolysis continued for 8 days, with hemoglobin and hematocrit reaching nadirs of 7.6 g/dL and 22.1%, respectively. The patient recovered following IV NAC therapy. The acetaminophen metabolite responsible for oxidant stress-induced hemolysis in G6PD-deficient patients is unknown (Ruha et al, 2001).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman presented to the hospital following an intentional ingestion of 11 g of paracetamol (196 mg/kg). A paracetamol concentration, obtained 4 hours postingestion, was 129 mg/L, and IV NAC was administered. Within 36 hours postingestion, the patient developed jaundice (total bilirubin 145 mcmol [baseline 35 mcmol]), but liver enzymes and prothrombin time were normal. A complete blood count indicated mild anemia (hemoglobin 96 g/L) and further analysis of the bilirubin determined it to be primarily unconjugated, suggesting the development of hemolysis with a presentation of significant jaundice secondary to paracetamol overdose. Further investigation of the patient revealed that she was G6PD-deficient. Four days postingestion, the patient's elevated bilirubin concentration began to decrease (42 mcmol) (Phillpotts et al, 2014).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman with a history of G6PD deficiency presented approximately 12 hours after an intentional acute ingestion of 10 g acetaminophen. Laboratory data revealed an acetaminophen level of 72.3 mcg/mL, a hemoglobin level of 13.6 g/dL, a mildly elevated ALT, and evidence of indirect bilirubinemia. The patient was started on an IV acetylcysteine infusion. Forty-two hours later, repeat laboratory data demonstrated AST and ALT levels of 9118 and 8796 International Units/L, an INR of 3.4, a decreased haptoglobin level of 25 mg/dL, a LDH level of 2250 International Units/L, an unconjugated bilirubin level of 6.9 mg/dL, a total bilirubin level of 10.1 mg/dL, and her urinalysis revealed bilirubinuria without hematuria, all of which is consistent with hemolytic anemia. A repeat serum acetaminophen level was negative. Although her liver function and INR improved over the next 4 days, her anemia worsened, with her hemoglobin level decreasing to a nadir of 8.6 g/dL (Rickner & Simpson, 2015).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) LYELL'S TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS, SUBEPIDERMAL TYPE
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), verified through skin biopsy and requiring hospitalization, has been described in a 7-year-old girl following the administration of 3 doses of acetaminophen (10 mg/kg). Later rechallenge with acetaminophen (a single 250 mg dose) resulted in a recurrence of TEN (Halevi et al, 2000).

Musculoskeletal

    3.15.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) RHABDOMYOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Rhabdomyolysis accompanying coma, with no hepatic dysfunction, has been rarely reported following an acute and massive acetaminophen overdose (Yang et al, 2001).

Endocrine

    3.16.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPERGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hyperglycemia is not common, but may occur as an early feature, following significant acetaminophen overdosage (Yang et al, 2001).
    b) Acetaminophen may interfere with the blood glucose measurement using a yellow springs instrument glucose analyzer (YSIGA) resulting in a falsely elevated blood glucose level (Farah, 1982).
    c) A case series describes 5 men who developed hyperglycemia 6 to 12 hours after acetaminophen overdose (Lawrence et al, 1995).
    B) HYPOGLYCEMIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypoglycemia may develop 2 to 4 days following severe overdoses with associated hepatic failure (Prescott et al, 1971; Davidson & Eastham, 1966; Thomson & Prescott, 1966).

Immunologic

    3.19.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACUTE ALLERGIC REACTION
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Reactions to acetaminophen have included bronchospasm, urticaria, hypotension and angioedema (Stricker et al, 1985; Ellis et al, 1989; Diem & Grilliat, 1990).
    b) CASE SERIES: Five cases of hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in adults who ingested 500 to 1000 mg of acetaminophen and developed the following symptoms within 15 minutes to 1 hour: bronchospasm (3), urticaria (4), hypotension (1), and collapse (1) (Stricker et al, 1985).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old woman took an overdose of acetaminophen 9 times in a 21-month period. On the sixth through ninth occasions, she developed a generalized erythematous rash without associated hemodynamic or respiratory effects (Huitema et al, 1998).

Genotoxicity

    A) A specific chromosome translocation was found in T-cells of a patient who had abused acetaminophen and codeine for 7 years, in amounts of acetaminophen up to 18 grams/day. Myelodysplasia and immunodeficiency (HIV negative) occurred secondary to the chromosome abnormality (Fyfe & Wright, 1990).
    B) The rate of mutagenesis was measured using the cytokinesis block micronucleus method in 12 human volunteers who ingested acetaminophen in one study. Peripheral lymphocyte micronuclei concentration was measured 0, 24, 72, and 168 hours after three doses of 1000 mg acetaminophen in 8 hours, and no mutagenic effect was found (Kocisova & Sram, 1990).
    C) Two independent studies have shown an increase in chromosomal damage in lymphocytes of human volunteers after intake of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen, whereas a third study was negative (Rannug et al, 1994).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Oral acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category B. IV acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. The combinations acetaminophen/pentazocine and butalbital/acetaminophen/caffeine/codeine phosphate have been classified as FDA pregnancy category C. Acetaminophen crosses the placental barrier; fetal blood levels will probably be as high as those of the mother. Begin NAC treatment in pregnant acetaminophen overdose patients as soon as possible after the overdose. Maternal ingestion of recommended doses of acetaminophen does NOT appear to present a risk to the fetus or nursing infant. In animal fertility studies, there was an increased percentage of abnormal sperm in male offspring and a decreased number of mating pairs producing a fifth litter, which suggests the possibility of cumulative acetaminophen toxicity after chronic use of the drug near the upper limit of daily dosing. There was also evidence of reduced testicular weight, spermatogenesis, and fertility in males and reduced implantation sites in females.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) RESPIRATORY SYSTEM EFFECTS
    1) A randomized controlled trial by the Peer Education in Pregnancy Study suggests that acetaminophen use during middle to late pregnancy may be related to wheezing during the first year of an infant’s life. Study subjects (n=345) were questioned at 4 different times during their pregnancy. Exposure to acetaminophen was defined as the mother having taken the medication at least once during the first trimester, middle pregnancy, late pregnancy, or postpartum. A total of 70% of the women had used acetaminophen at least once during their pregnancy (40.1% first trimester, 38.1% middle pregnancy, 49% late pregnancy, and 59.9% in either middle or late pregnancy). Development of respiratory symptoms in the children of the study subjects was defined as any positive response to a series of questions regarding wheezing, coughing, breathing problems, hospital visits and admission for breathing problems, and asthma from week 4 through month 9 of life. Respiratory symptoms were commonly reported (33% wheezing, 21.5% wheezing that disturbed sleep, 65.4% coughing that disturbed sleep, 33.9% ER visit for respiratory problem, 10.1% hospitalized for a respiratory problem, 4.6% were diagnosed with asthma). Multivariate analyses of respiratory end points in relation to acetaminophen use during pregnancy demonstrated an increased risk of wheezing (odds ratio (OR), 1.7; 95% CI, 1 to 3) and wheezing that disturbed sleep (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.6) by 1 year of age. However, further analysis demonstrated that the increase in a child's risk for respiratory symptoms is only statistically significant with middle to late pregnancy use of acetaminophen. The impact of acetaminophen use on other respiratory symptoms was not statistically significant (Persky et al, 2008).
    B) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) In a large population-based, prospective, cohort of women with live born singletons (n=26,424), there was no increased risk of congenital malformations in infants born to mothers who were exposed to oral acetaminophen during the first trimester compared with a control group of mothers and children not exposed; the incidence of congenital anomalies was 4.3% which is similar to the incidence in the general population (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) In a population-based, case-control study from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, there was no increased risk of major birth defects in infants with prenatal acetaminophen exposure during the first trimester (n=11,610) compared with a control group (n=4500) (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    3) MUSCULAR VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECTS (mVSDs): A study analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) and found no significant association between acetaminophen or NSAID use and the development of muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSDs). Exposure to acetaminophen or NSAIDs was defined as taking either medication at least once during the first trimester or 1 month before pregnancy to delivery. The researchers also analyzed the association between febrile illness and the development of mVSD, with febrile illness defined as a fever greater than or equal to 100 degrees F. There were 168 cases and 692 controls included in the study. The 2 case groups evaluated were: all mVSD infants (included those infants with other minor cardiac defects or noncardiac defects; n=168) and those with isolated mVSDs (n=133). Acetaminophen use was high in both groups with 62% cases and 57% controls reporting use during the first trimester, and 77% cases and 72% controls reporting use anytime from 1 month prior to pregnancy to delivery. The use of NSAIDs was lower with 18% cases and 19% controls reporting use during the first trimester, and 29% cases and 30% controls reporting use anytime from 1 month prior to pregnancy to delivery. There was also no correlation found between exposure to acetaminophen or NSAIDs during a febrile episode and the development of mVSD. The patients in all groups could not provide detailed information on the frequency or duration of use of either acetaminophen or NSAIDs (Cleves et al, 2004).
    4) There is no clear evidence that acetaminophen is teratogenic. Researchers studied 123 pregnant women who received prescriptions for acetaminophen during pregnancy and/or 30 days before conception and compared them with 13,327 controls who did not receive acetaminophen prescriptions. More malformations were found in the acetaminophen group (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1 to 5.4), but the type of malformations did not indicate a causal link. No evidence of altered fetal growth was found with acetaminophen use during pregnancy (Thulstrup et al, 1999).
    5) There is no clear evidence that either acetaminophen or NAC is teratogenic (Riggs et al, 1989; McElhatton et al, 1990; McElhatton et al, 1990a).
    C) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: There was evidence of dose-related increases in bone variations (reduced ossification and rudimentary rib changes) when pregnant rats were given oral acetaminophen at doses up to 4 g/day (0.85 times the maximum human daily dose (MHDD) based on body surface area) during organogenesis. There was, however, no evidence of external, visceral, or skeletal malformations in the offspring. Areas of necrosis developed in the livers and kidneys of rats and fetuses when pregnant rats received oral acetaminophen at doses of 1.2 times the MHDD throughout gestation. At doses that were 0.3 times the MHDD, necrosis did not occur (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) IN VITRO ANIMAL STUDIES: Addition of acetaminophen (0.5 millimolar solution) to cultured rat embryos resulted in an increased incidence of morphologically similar, abnormally open anterior neuropores. This effect was not reproducible by intra-amniotic microinjections of 3500 nanograms of acetaminophen in pregnant rats (Stark et al, 1990).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) ACUTE OVERDOSE
    1) CASE REPORT: A 32-year-old pregnant woman ingested 64 g of acetaminophen at 15.5 weeks' gestation. Her acetaminophen level 10 hours post-overdose was 198.5 mcg/mL. NAC was started approximately 20 hours postingestion. The patient developed hepatic necrosis and adult respiratory distress syndrome. With aggressive treatment, the mother survived and delivered a viable infant at 32 weeks' gestation (Ludmir et al, 1986).
    2) CASE REPORT: After taking an unknown amount of acetaminophen during pregnancy, an 18-year-old primigravida woman presented at 33 weeks' gestation with intrauterine fetal death and an initial diagnosis of acute hepatic failure secondary to acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Due to markedly elevated liver transaminases, acetaminophen serum levels of 34 mg/L and later 19.2 mg/L, and liver biopsy results showing fatty liver of pregnancy with superimposed centrilobular hepatocellular coagulative necrosis, a diagnosis of acetaminophen toxicity was suspected. After inducing labor, a stillborn fetus (death, 1 to 2 days prior to delivery) with normal morphology was reported. A liver transplant was performed on the third postpartum day (Gill et al, 2002).
    3) Pregnant acute overdose patients have delivered normal healthy infants (Byer et al, 1982a; Ludmir et al, 1986a; Friedman et al, 1993). Acetaminophen appears to cross the placenta, and fetal liver cells are capable of metabolizing acetaminophen, placing the fetus at risk in overdose. Acetaminophen overdose does not appear to increase the risk for birth defects or adverse pregnancy outcome unless severe maternal toxicity results (Kozer & Koren, 2001). Pregnant overdose patients with toxic acetaminophen levels should be treated with NAC as soon as possible after the overdose and delivery should NOT be induced before the protocol is completed unless there are other overriding factors. Rapid treatment with NAC of the pregnant patient is the best way to treat the fetus.
    4) CASE SERIES: In a series of 4 pregnant women with acetaminophen overdose who delivered their infants while receiving NAC therapy, NAC concentrations in cord blood at the time of delivery in 3 infants and in cardiac blood of the fourth averaged 9.4 mcg/mL, which is within the range associated with therapeutic NAC administration to adults. None of the infants had evidence of acetaminophen toxicity, while two of the mothers developed hepatotoxicity, one did not and results on the fourth mother were unknown. NAC appears to cross the human placenta and may provide protection from acetaminophen toxicity in the infant (Horowitz et al, 1997).
    5) CASE REPORT: A 2.88-kg term infant was exposed to 20 g of acetaminophen 3 hours prior to delivery when the mother took an intentional overdose. The infant's acetaminophen level at 9 hours postexposure was 133 mg/L, with evidence of hepatotoxicity (INR of 3). Following treatment with NAC, the infant recovered and was discharged on day 7 (Aw et al, 1999).
    6) In cases where maternal and fetal plasma acetaminophen levels have been measured following maternal overdose, the fetal level equaled that of the mother (Kumar et al, 1990).
    7) Studies have shown the ability of fetal and neonatal liver cells to oxidize drugs during the first part of gestation and to form reactive metabolites which could cause liver damage (Rollins et al, 1979).
    8) SURVEY: A questionnaire-directed survey conducted among medical and health care personnel inquiring about drug intake of pregnant patients concluded that acetaminophen overdose per se is not necessarily an indication for termination of pregnancy (McElhatton et al, 1990).
    9) PROSPECTIVE STUDIES: A study of 113 cases of acetaminophen overdose in various stages of pregnancy could not demonstrate malformation from either acetaminophen or NAC treatment. High levels of acetaminophen were found in 1 stillborn fetus. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion or fetal death were time to initiation of NAC therapy, and stage of pregnancy. Women who had delayed treatment in the first trimester had the poorest fetal outcome (Riggs et al, 1989).
    10) In 1 study of 213 acetaminophen overdoses during pregnancy, normal neonates were delivered in 147 cases, fetal malformations occurred in 9 cases, fetal death occurred in 18, and elective termination was performed in 39 cases (McElhatton et al, 1991).
    B) ADHD
    1) Acetaminophen use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of hyperkinetic disorders (HKD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or ADHD-like behaviors according to a Danish National cohort study. More than half of all mothers reported acetaminophen use during pregnancy (n=36,187). Children exposed to acetaminophen at any point during pregnancy were at an increased risk of hospital-diagnosed HKD (hazard ratio (HR), 1.37; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.59). An increase in the need for ADHD medications (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.44) and in ADHD-like behaviors at age 7 (risk ratio (RR), 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.27) were also observed. Risk increased in patients with acetaminophen use during more than 1 trimester, especially later in the pregnancy, and with increased frequency during pregnancy (p less than 0.001). A significant and consistently higher risk of HKD and ADHD was observed with the increased number of weeks of use (p less than 0.001). The risk of HKD diagnosis almost doubled in children exposed for greater than or equal to 20 weeks during pregnancy (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.45) and the risk of receiving ADHD medications increased by 50% (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.94). These results were not altered by maternal inflammation, infection during pregnancy, mental status of the mother, or other potential confounders (Liew et al, 2014).
    C) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    1) Pregnant acute overdose patients have delivered normal healthy infants (Byer et al, 1982a; Ludmir et al, 1986a; Friedman et al, 1993). Acetaminophen appears to cross the placenta, and fetal liver cells are capable of metabolizing acetaminophen, placing the fetus at risk in overdose. Acetaminophen overdose does not appear to increase the risk for birth defects or adverse pregnancy outcome unless severe maternal toxicity results (Kozer & Koren, 2001). Pregnant overdose patients with toxic acetaminophen levels should be treated with NAC as soon as possible after the overdose and delivery should NOT be induced before the protocol is completed unless there are other overriding factors. Rapid treatment with NAC of the pregnant patient is the best way to treat the fetus.
    2) CASE SERIES: In a series of 4 pregnant women with acetaminophen overdose who delivered their infants while receiving NAC therapy, NAC concentrations in cord blood at the time of delivery in 3 infants and in cardiac blood of the fourth averaged 9.4 mcg/mL, which is within the range associated with therapeutic NAC administration to adults. None of the infants had evidence of acetaminophen toxicity, while two of the mothers developed hepatotoxicity, one did not and results on the fourth mother were unknown. NAC appears to cross the human placenta and may provide protection from acetaminophen toxicity in the infant (Horowitz et al, 1997).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 2.88-kg term infant was exposed to 20 g of acetaminophen 3 hours prior to delivery when the mother took an intentional overdose. The infant's acetaminophen level at 9 hours postexposure was 133 mg/L, with evidence of hepatotoxicity (INR of 3). Following treatment with NAC, the infant recovered and was discharged on day 7 (Aw et al, 1999).
    4) It was found that the absorption, metabolism, and renal clearance of a standard oral dose of acetaminophen did not change during pregnancy (Rayburn et al, 1986).
    5) In cases where the mother and fetus's plasma acetaminophen levels have been measured following maternal overdose, the fetus's level equaled that of the mother (Kumar et al, 1990).
    6) Studies have shown the ability of fetal and neonatal liver cells to oxidize drugs during the first part of gestation and to form reactive metabolites, which could cause liver damage (Rollins et al, 1979).
    7) PROSPECTIVE STUDIES: A study of 113 cases of acetaminophen overdose in various stages of pregnancy could not demonstrate malformation from either acetaminophen or NAC treatment. High levels of acetaminophen were found in 1 stillborn fetus. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion or fetal death were time to initiation of NAC therapy, and stage of pregnancy. Women who had delayed treatment in the first trimester had the poorest fetal outcome (Riggs et al, 1989).
    8) In 1 study of 213 acetaminophen overdoses during pregnancy, normal neonates were delivered in 147 cases, fetal malformations occurred in 9 cases, fetal death occurred in 18, and elective termination was performed in 39 cases (McElhatton et al, 1991).
    D) PREGNANCY CATEGORY
    1) Oral acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category B (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) oral, 2010). IV acetaminophen has been classified as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) The manufacturers have classified the combinations acetaminophen/pentazocine and butalbital/acetaminophen/caffeine/codeine phosphate as FDA pregnancy category C (Prod Info pentazocine acetaminophen oral tablets, 2013; Prod Info butalbital acetaminophen caffeine codeine phosphate oral capsules, 2014).
    E) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) MISCARRIAGE: Use of acetaminophen during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage over nonuse (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8) in a study of 1055 women. Use of products containing acetaminophen, such as Vicodin(R) and Tylenol(R) with Codeine were also included in the analysis. In the same study, NSAID and acetylsalicylic acid use was associated with an increase in miscarriage risk (Li et al, 2003).
    2) CASE REPORT: Acetaminophen overdose occurred in a 26-year-old female at 36 weeks' gestation. The patient was admitted 4.5 hours after ingestion of 22.5 g of acetaminophen and promptly placed on the Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center protocol for acetaminophen overdose. The patient was successfully treated and delivered a healthy infant girl at 42 weeks' gestation. This report indicates that if treatment is begun early and response is rapid, maternal and fetal outcome may be good (if occurring in the third trimester) (Byer et al, 1982). At this time, it is unknown how much acetaminophen is passed to the fetus following a maternal overdose. The capability of the fetus to handle acetaminophen is also unknown. If the acetaminophen depletes fetal glutathione stores or saturates sulfate conjugation, reactive metabolites would be available to cause fetal liver damage.
    F) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RATS: There was evidence of fetotoxicity (decreased fetal weight and length) when pregnant rats were given oral acetaminophen at doses up to 4 g/day (0.85 times the maximum human daily dose based on body surface area) (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) MICE: There was a dose-related reduction in body weight of the fourth and fifth litter of offspring of the treated mating pair at all doses when pregnant mice were exposed to acetaminophen as part of their diet at 357 mg/kg/day (0.25%), 715 mg/kg/day (0.5%), or 1430 mg/kg/day (1%) which corresponds to 0.43, 0.81, and 1.7 times the maximum human daily dose (MHDD), respectively, on a body surface area basis, during lactation and postweaning in a continuous breeding study. In the high dose group, there was a decreased number of litters per mating pair, an increased percentage of abnormal sperm (in male offspring), and decreased birth weights in the next generation pups (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) BREAST MILK
    1) Exercise caution when administering IV acetaminophen to a nursing woman. There are no studies of IV acetaminophen use in nursing mothers. With oral acetaminophen exposure, the daily acetaminophen dose in nursing infants was calculated as approximately 1% to 2% of the maternal dose, according to data from more than 15 nursing mothers (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013). Acetaminophen is distributed in the breast milk in amount ranging from 0.1% to 1.85% of the maternal dose (Prod Info Tylenol(R), 1999).
    2) Acetaminophen appears to partition into the milk of lactating mothers with peak concentrations of 10 to 15 mcg/mL 1 to 2 hours following an oral dose of 650 mg. Neither acetaminophen nor its metabolites were detected in nursing infants' urine (Berlin et al, 1980; Bitzen et al, 1981).
    3) CASE REPORT: A skin rash was observed in a 2-month-old breast-fed infant whose mother had been receiving acetaminophen 1 g at bedtime for 2 days. The rash was maculopapular and appeared on the baby's upper trunk and face; withdrawal of acetaminophen in the mother resulted in subsidence of the rash in approximately 24 hours. Two weeks later, a similar rash occurred in the infant following a 1-g dose of acetaminophen to the mother (Matheson et al, 1985). Toxicity to the neonate during lactation or due to neonatal use may be limited by immaturity of metabolic pathways.
    4) Although acetaminophen appears in breast milk, the concentration does not appear sufficient to result in a pharmacologically significant dose to the breastfeeding infant (Anon: Committee on Drugs & American Academy of Pediatrics, 1994; Berlin et al, 1980a; Bitzen et al, 1981).
    B) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) Maternal ingestion of recommended doses of acetaminophen does not appear to present a risk to the nursing infant.
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) MICE: As part of the National Toxicology Program, fertility assessments were conducted in Swiss mice via a continuous breeding study. No effects on fertility parameters were evident in mice consuming up to 1.7 times the maximum human daily dose (MHDD) of acetaminophen, based on a body surface area comparison. There was no effect on sperm motility or sperm density in the epididymis; however, there was a significant increase in the percentage of abnormal sperm in mice consuming 1.7 times the MHDD (based on a body surface area comparison) and there was a reduction in the number of mating pairs producing a fifth litter at this dose, suggesting the potential for cumulative toxicity with chronic administration of acetaminophen near the upper limit of daily dosing (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) RODENTS: There was evidence of reduced testicular weight, spermatogenesis, and fertility in males and reduced implantation sites in females when given oral acetaminophen at doses that were 1.2 times the maximum human daily dose (MHDD) or greater (based on body surface area). The duration of treatment was associated with an increase in these adverse effects. The clinical significance of this study is unknown (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS103-90-2 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Paracetamol (Acetaminophen)
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 3
    1) The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Acetaminophen-containing analgesics were not associated with an increased incidence of renal, pelvis, ureter, or bladder cancer in a case-control study. In another case control study, patients who ingested acetaminophen had a decreased risk of developing ovarian cancer.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) LACK OF EFFECT
    1) No association was found between consumption of acetaminophen-containing analgesics and the incidence of cancer of the renal pelvis, ureter, or bladder in a retrospective case-control investigation in 1189 patients (McCredie & Stewart, 1988).
    2) In a case control study, patients who ingested acetaminophen were at decreased risk of developing ovarian cancer (Cramer et al, 1998).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Patients who present early (within 8 hours of ingestion) only require a serum acetaminophen determination. In those patients who require acetylcysteine treatment, liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, and renal function should be monitored.
    B) Patients who present with an unknown time of ingestion or more than 8 hours after an ingestion should have a serum acetaminophen determination, electrolytes, renal function tests, liver enzymes and an INR.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) SPECIFIC AGENT
    1) ACETAMINOPHEN LEVEL INTERPRETATION/TIMING: Obtain a 4-hour post-ingestion acetaminophen plasma level. Levels obtained earlier may not reflect complete absorption and CANNOT be used to predict toxic effects or the need for NAC therapy. Acetaminophen levels obtained 4 to 16 hours after ingestion are most predictive of potential hepatotoxicity.
    a) In one study serum acetaminophen levels drawn less than 4 hours after overdose were useful in predicting need for NAC therapy. At acetaminophen levels greater than 200 mg/L, NAC therapy was needed; at levels less than 200 mg/L, NAC was not needed (Paloucek & Gorman, 1992).
    b) In another study, an acetaminophen level of less than 100 micrograms/mL drawn between 2 and 4 hours after ingestion had a negative predictive value of .98 when compared with an acetaminophen level drawn 4 hours or more after ingestion (Douglas et al, 1994). Further studies are needed before acetaminophen levels drawn before 4 hours can be used to guide therapy.
    2) PLOTTING LEVELS: Plot acetaminophen level on the NOMOGRAM provided with POISINDEX(R) to estimate potential for toxicity.
    3) PEAK LEVEL: Peak acetaminophen level is usually reached 4 hours after ingestion of an overdose. Acetaminophen levels obtained before that time should NOT be used to predict toxicity or need for NAC.
    4) SUBSEQUENT LEVELS: Continue the entire NAC regimen if the initial plasma level is above the "treatment" line even if subsequent levels fall below this line, or even if acetaminophen is completely cleared from the plasma (Hall & Rumack, 1986).
    5) SUSTAINED-RELEASE PRODUCT: The interpretation of blood levels following overdose of sustained-release products (Tylenol Extended Relief(R)) has not been studied. McNeil Consumer Products Co. recommends the following (McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, 2005):
    a) An initial plasma acetaminophen level should be drawn 4 or more hours post-ingestion and plotted on the nomogram. An additional level should be drawn 4 to 6 hours after the first level and plotted on the nomogram. If either level is above the possible risk treatment line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, an entire course of NAC should be administered or, if initiated, completed. If both levels are below the possible risk treatment line, then NAC therapy may be withheld or, if initiated, discontinued.
    b) For assistance with ingestions of Tylenol Extended Relief(R) please call the Rocky Mountain Poison Center, toll free, at 1-800-525-6115.
    6) FORMULA CALCULATION: A formula to predict 4-hour plasma acetaminophen level based on amount ingested (Edwards et al, 1986) depends on frequently unreliable overdose histories, and has been shown not to be predictive of measured serum levels (Paloucek et al, 1989). It should NOT be used to determine the need for NAC therapy.
    a) Cp4h (in mcg/mL) = (0.59) (mg/kg dose)
    7) NOMOGRAM: The nomogram refers to the plasma free acetaminophen concentration. Be sure the laboratory method used determines this figure (Buttery, 1983).
    a) The acetaminophen nomogram determines the need for specific antidote therapy. It is used to interpret a single plasma level obtained 4 to 24 hours after a single acute ingestion. Levels obtained before 4 hours or after 24 hours cannot be interpreted, nor can levels obtained after chronic or repeated ingestion.
    b) A level above the lower or "treatment" line predicts risk for delayed hepatotoxicity and the need for the full NAC treatment regimen.
    c) CAUTIONS FOR USE: This nomogram is to be used in conjunction with the POISINDEX(R) Acetaminophen Management.
    1) The time coordinates refer to TIME SINCE INGESTION.
    2) Serum levels drawn before 4 hours may not represent peak levels.
    3) The graph should be used only in relation to a single acute ingestion. There are little data on the use of the nomogram in patients ingesting a toxic dose over a longer period of time (Mathis et al, 1988). Further studies are needed to assess the utility of the nomogram in subacute acetaminophen ingestions.
    4) The lower line 25% below the standard nomogram is included to allow for possible errors in acetaminophen plasma assays and estimated time from ingestion.
    5) The nomogram should be used cautiously in patients receiving chronic therapy with known enzyme-inducing drugs and in patients ingesting drugs that delay gastric emptying.
    6) Some authors have suggested decreasing the toxic nomogram line by 50% to 70% in patients taking enzyme-inducing drugs or chronic alcoholics (Smith et al, 1986; Minton et al, 1988); there is no scientific proof of the validity of these assumptions.
    7) Concomitantly ingested drugs which change the rate of gastric emptying (codeine, other opiates, antimuscarinic drugs, antihistamines), may delay absorption. Additional levels may be needed to determine the peak and the need for antidote (Muller et al, 1983).
    8) HALF-LIFE: Acetaminophen half-life is NOT a sensitive predictor of hepatotoxicity and should NOT be used to determine the need for NAC therapy (Donovan, 1987a).
    a) In one study of 2534 patients treated with NAC, a half-life of greater than 4 hours had a positive predictive value of 0.22 and a negative predictive value of 0.96 in predicting peak AST greater than 1000 International Units/Liter (Douglas et al, 1994). A level above the possible toxicity line had a positive predictive value of 0.15 and a negative predictive value of 0.98 in the same group of patients. Half-life determination offers no advantage over obtaining a single level.
    9) SUBSEQUENT LEVELS: Continue the entire NAC regimen if the initial plasma level is above the "treatment" line even if subsequent levels fall below this line, or even if acetaminophen is completely cleared from the plasma (Hall & Rumack, 1986).
    B) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) TRANSAMINASE LEVELS: ALT/SGPT and AST/SGOT may rise within 24 hours after ingestion and peak within 48 to 72 hours (Singer et al, 1995). Levels over 10,000 units/L are common.
    a) An early marker for subclinical hepatic injury following acetaminophen overdose is serum alpha glutathione S-transferase (a-GST), which is both released into and cleared from the circulation more rapidly than AST (Sivilotti et al, 1999).
    b) Decreased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) or C-reactive protein (a surrogate for IL-6) levels following acute acetaminophen overdose have been found to be statistically associated with hepatic injury and may serve as prognostic factors for predicting impending hepatic injury (Waksman et al, 2001).
    2) BILIRUBIN: Plasma bilirubin may begin to rise within 24 hours of ingestion (Singer et al, 1995); peak level seldom exceeds 10 mg/dL.
    a) Fatal cases usually have a bilirubin level greater than 4 mg/dL and a prothrombin time greater than twice the control or a prothrombin time ratio of 2.2 or greater on the third to the fifth day (Linden & Rumack, 1984).
    3) ALBUMIN: Serum prealbumin concentrations decrease significantly after 36 hours and continue to decrease during liver failure, providing a true index of liver function (Hutchinson et al, 1980).
    4) BLOOD GLUCOSE: Hyperglycemia is rare. Acetaminophen interferes with yellow springs instrument glucose analyzer giving falsely elevated concentrations (Farah, 1982). Acetaminophen can also elevate blood glucose concentrations determined using the Glucometer Elite and Accu-check advantage glucose meters (Cartier et al, 1998). An alternative method of blood glucose measurement should be employed before starting insulin therapy (Linden & Rumack, 1984).
    5) Hypoglycemia may be seen 2 to 4 days post-ingestion with severe overdoses and hepatic failure.
    6) ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN: Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been commonly used as a marker of hepatocellular carcinoma. A prospective study was conducted, involving 239 patients with acetaminophen poisoning and an ALT level greater than 1000 units/L. On the day of the peak ALT level, an increase in the AFP above 4 mcg/L occurred in 158 of 201 survivors (79%) compared with 11 of 33 non-survivors (33%), and, on day 1 after the maximum ALT levels, AFP values were significantly higher in survivors compared with non-survivors (9.2 +/- 9 mcg/L vs 2.4 +/- 0.8 mcg/L, respectively). The results of this study showed that serum AFP levels may be a strong prognostic indicator of outcome in the setting of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2005).
    7) SERUM PHOSPHATE: Although there have been reports that serum phosphate levels may be used as an early predictor of clinical outcome in patients with paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure, a retrospective analysis was conducted to determine serum phosphate's predictive value in the setting of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity. The results of the study showed that serum phosphate concentrations were significantly higher in non-survivors or transplanted patients than in survivors on day 2 post-overdose (1.32 +/-1.06 mmol/L vs 0.66 +/-0.26 mmol/L, respectively) but not on day 3 (0.98 +/-0.81 mmol/L vs 0.64 +/-0.38 mmol/L, respectively), indicating that serum phosphate concentration is not a useful early predictor of outcome in paracetamol-induced hepatic failure (Ng et al, 2004).
    8) RENAL FUNCTION TESTS: Renal insufficiency may develop 2 to 4 days after toxic ingestion, peak levels of BUN and creatinine may be delayed 7 to 10 days (Murphy et al, 1990). Generally renal and hepatic toxicity develop concurrently; renal injury rarely develops alone (Campbell & Baylis, 1992). Hyperphosphatemia (greater than 1.2 mmol/L), occurring 48 to 96 hours after the overdose, and in the presence of both renal and hepatic dysfunction, is a poor prognostic indicator (Schmidt et al, 2002).
    a) Plasma creatinine rises more rapidly than the BUN when renal failure is present. Liver failure may keep the BUN low.
    9) AMYLASE: Hyperamylasemia may develop 2 to 3 days following toxic ingestions with hepatic injury (Gilmore & Touvras, 1977; Caldarola et al, 1985; Hord et al, 1992).
    a) A retrospective study, conducted to determine the incidence and prognostic implications of hyperamylasemia in acetaminophen poisoning, revealed that the incidence and severity of hyperamylasemia (serum amylase level greater than 100 units/L) appeared to increase with the severity of hepatotoxicity induced by acetaminophen poisoning, with hyperamylasemia occurring in 57 of 76 survivors (75%) from fulminant hepatic failure and in 61 of 72 non-survivors (85%) compared with hyperamylasemia occurring in 128 of 666 patients (19%) without fulminant hepatic failure. Fifty-five of 168 patients (33%) with a serum amylase level of greater than 150 units/L either died or underwent liver transplants compared with 17 of 646 patients (2.6%) with a serum amylase level of 150 units/L or less. Acute pancreatitis was a less frequent occurrence, with only 14% of paracetamol-associated hyperamylasemia cases reported (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2004).
    10) A variety of biochemical markers (ie, hemoglobin, pyruvate, calcium, and phenylalanine levels) were identified and combined to form a prognostic model that, when applied to patients at hospital admission, appeared to accurately predict the outcome of patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The prognostic tool was derived used a cohort of 97 patients and prospectively validated with a second cohort of 86 patients admitted to the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit for acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Hemoglobin, pyruvate, and phenylalanine levels were significantly lower in patients who either subsequently died or underwent transplantation compared with patients who spontaneously survived. This prognostic model of outcome in acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure appears to be as accurate a predictor as utilizing King's College Hospital criteria, but at an earlier stage of the patient's condition (Dabos et al, 2005).
    a) Based on the prognostic model that was developed using stepwise forward logistic regression analysis the following formula was created to predict outcome:
    1) (400 x pyruvate mmols/L) + (50 x phenylalanine (mmols/L) - (4 x hemoglobin g/dL)
    11) ARTERIAL LACTATE: Hyperlactatemia has been suggested as a prognostic indicator in acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure and for possible inclusion as a modification to the King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria. A prospective study, conducted to determine whether arterial lactate measurements are valuable as a prognostic marker, showed that, although hyperlactatemia occurred more frequently in non-survivors than in survivors at admission (9.8 +/-6.5 mmol/L vs 5.2 +/- 4.2 mmol/L; p=0.00004) and at onset of hepatic encephalopathy (6.9 +/-5.6 mmol/L vs 3.2 +/-2 mmol/L; p less than 0.00001), adding arterial lactate measurements as a modification to the KCH criteria increased its sensitivity but reduced its specificity to less than 50%, indicating that this modification is not better than the existing KCH criteria (Schmidt & Larsen, 2006).
    C) COAGULATION STUDIES
    1) Prothrombin time or INR may begin to rise within 24 hours of ingestion (Singer et al, 1995). Some authorities start prophylaxis against hepatic encephalopathy if the prothrombin ratio rises above 3.
    a) Acetaminophen does not interfere with the prothrombin time assay (Van der Steeg et al, 1995).
    2) Fatal cases usually have a bilirubin level greater than 4 mg/dl and a prothrombin time greater than twice the control or a prothrombin time ratio of 2.2 or greater on the third to the fifth day.
    D) HEMATOLOGIC
    1) Patients with acetaminophen toxicity whose ethnic backgrounds place them at risk for G6PD deficiency should be monitored for signs of hemolytic anemia (Ruha et al, 2001).
    E) TOXICITY
    1) Early elevations of aminotransferases and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) were the most sensitive and specific predictors of hepatotoxicity in a prospective study of patients treated with the 20-hour intravenous NAC protocol. Acetaminophen half-life and prothrombin time ratio were less reliable predictors (Donovan, 1987a).
    2) GST is a more sensitive early predictor of moderate to severe liver damage and minor acute liver injury than is ALT/SGPT. F protein is intermediate between the two (Beckett et al, 1989).
    3) A normal initial PT was a good predictor of favorable outcome (peak AST less than 1000 units/liter) in a series of 190 NAC treated acetaminophen overdose patients (Van der Steeg et al, 1995a).
    F) LABORATORY INTERFERENCE
    1) Salicylates (Mace & Walker, 1979; (Reed et al, 1982), salicylamide (Chafetz et al, 1971), levodopa, methyldopa, dopamine, epinephrine (Andrews et al, 1982), and possibly cresol (Pitts, 1979) have been reported to interfere with colorimetric determination of acetaminophen levels, resulting in falsely elevated concentrations.
    2) GLUCOSE: Acetaminophen may interfere with the blood glucose determination using a yellow springs instrument glucose analyzer (YSIGA) resulting in a falsely elevated blood glucose (Farah, 1982).
    a) Laboratory interferences have been reported to occur with acetaminophen on point-of-care glucose meters. Only electrode-based glucose meters are affected, with falsely increased values for glucose, increased by 79 mg/dL when acetaminophen was 332 mg/L (Osterloh, 1998)
    b) In one case, a patient was admitted to the ICU with a suspected drug overdose. The handheld glucometer at the patient's bedside reported a blood glucose level of 6.1 mmol/L. A repeat measurement of the patient's glucose level, via a laboratory glucose analyzer, reported a level of 0.9 mmol/L. The patient's serum paracetamol level was 3960 mcmol/L. Further investigation of the glucose level discrepancy revealed that the laboratory analyzer uses either oxidase or hexokinase as the glucose reagent, which does not interact with paracetamol, whereas hand-held glucometers often use potassium ferricyanide/potassium ferrocyanide as glucose reagents which can interact with paracetamol, resulting in falsely elevated blood glucose readings (Ho & Liang, 2003)
    c) Hyperglycemia is not common following acetaminophen overdose. An alternative method of measuring glucose should be used before insulin therapy is started.
    3) DIGOXIN: Serum digoxin-like immunoreactive substance levels which correlated with serum creatinine levels were found (mean 0.53 +/- 0.19 nanograms/ml) in 31 patients with acute acetaminophen overdose (Yang et al, 1988).
    4) Acetaminophen may interfere with blood lactate measurements performed by certain blood gas analyzers. Blood acetaminophen level of 75 mcg/mL increased lactate levels by 20% using the Nova Stat Profile 9 analyzer and by 30% using the Ciba Corning Diagnostic 860 analyzer (Lacoma et al, 1997).
    5) FALSE POSITIVE ETHYLENE GLYCOL results were obtained in 3 cases of fulminant hepatic failure due to chronic acetaminophen abuse with the use of the ethylene glycol assay by glucose dehydrogenase enzyme technique. The authors speculate the false positive results are probably due to increased LDH and/or lactate associated with liver failure and acidosis (Wax et al, 1999).
    6) FALSE POSITIVE ACETAMINOPHEN levels may result in cases of unexplained liver failure in jaundiced patients (bilirubin levels >25 mg/dL) using the GDS Diagnostic Assay (acetaminophen not present by gas chromatography/mass spectometry (GC/MS)). Elevated serum bilirubin level was associated with measurable acetaminophen concentrations (178 mg/L) using the GDS Diagnostics assay in when acetaminophen was not detectable by GC/MS (Beuhler et al, 2002).
    7) SALICYLATE: Laboratory interference with a dry reagent assay (Vitros analyzers) used for salicylate assays is reported, with false increases of salicylate values by as much as 5% to 10% with concurrent acetaminophen usage (Osterloh, 1998).
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) Hematuria and proteinuria may develop with renal injury.
    B) URINARY LEVELS
    1) A qualitative urine acetaminophen screen (thin- layer chromatography) was compared to a qualitative serum acetaminophen screen in 88 patients following intentional ingestions. It was found that a negative urine acetaminophen was highly predictive of negative serum acetaminophen levels. The authors suggested that a negative urine screen may obviate the need for 4 hour quantitative serum levels. However, further validation is required (Perrone et al, 1999).
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) An ECG should be obtained in severe acetaminophen poisonings. There have been reports of myocardial necrosis and pericarditis (Will & Tomkins, 1971; Weston et al, 1976).

Methods

    A) IMMUNOASSAY
    1) ABBOTT TDX FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY: Rapid, easy to perform, free of interferences from other drugs, and results correlate well with those of high pressure liquid chromatography through a wide range of concentrations (Edinboro et al, 1991). EMIT(R) ASSAY: When compared with high pressure liquid chromatography analysis of the same samples in 2 laboratories, had correlation coefficients of 0.984 (n=98) and 0.964 (n=54) (Syva Company, 1984).
    2) ALPHA-GST (a-GST) ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (HEPKIT) is available for determination of serum alpha-glutathione S-transferase, with a turn-around-time of less than 3 hours. Serum a-GST appears to be a more sensitive measurement of subclinical hepatic injury than AST following acetaminophen overdose (Sivilotti et al, 1999).
    B) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC): Also an accurate although somewhat more labor intensive method of analysis through a wide range of serum concentrations without interference from other drugs (Blair & Rumack, 1977; Duffy & Byers, 1979).
    2) Gas chromatography is also a reliable method.
    3) Ion-pair liquid-liquid extraction of samples prior to reversed-phase ion-pair isocratic HPLC may increase resolution compared with simple direct injection of urine or protein precipitated plasma samples (Kamali & Herd, 1990).
    4) The high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectometry method with UV and radioactivity detection was used for the analysis of the toxic oxidative metabolites of acetaminophen in human liver samples. It was reported to be a simple and fast method for screening these metabolites (Hazai et al, 2002).
    C) MULTIPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
    1) High pressure liquid chromatography and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay are recommended methods for analysis of samples for acetaminophen. Other methods, including colorimetrics and other immunoassays, are used but results may be affected by interfering compounds and may not be accurate at low concentrations.
    2) COLORIMETRIC: The results obtained from some colorimetric assays may be unreliable. Methods that depend on acid hydrolysis of the sample prior to extraction do not distinguish between parent drug and metabolites, and may overestimate acetaminophen concentrations by as much as 700% compared with high pressure liquid chromatography (Stewart et al, 1979).
    a) Another colorimetric assay (Glynn & Kendall) overestimates actual drug concentration at levels below 50 mcg/mL (Duffy & Byers, 1979).
    3) FERRIC REDUCTION METHOD: The ferric reduction colorimetric method appeared reasonably reliable at acetaminophen levels of 50 mcg/ml and 200 mcg/ml with a sufficiently low cost to benefit a small hospital which performs infrequent tests (Bridges et al, 1983).
    4) COLORIMETRIC ASSAY: A colorimetric technique for determination of acetaminophen in serum and plasma (50 to 450 micrograms/milliliter) has been reported (Patel & Morton, 1988).
    a) Eight of 178 drug/drug combination products tested interfered significantly with the quantitative assay. All of these were able to be corrected in order to arrive at a semiquantitative value for acetaminophen concentration (Patel & Morton, 1988).
    5) RAPID ACETAMINOPHEN METER: A meter using one drop of whole blood, and providing results within 30 seconds, correlated strongly with simultaneous high pressure liquid chromatography or TDX analysis in 61 samples (Shannon et al, 1989).
    6) URINE: A rapid urinary screen for acetaminophen with modification to avoid false-negative results is described (Ray et al, 1987; Buttery et al, 1988).
    7) SERUM/TISSUE: A method to detect acetaminophen-protein adducts in biological samples is reported (Roberts et al, 1987; Potter et al, 1989; Pumford et al, 1989).
    a) Measuring acetaminophen-protein adducts in serum or hepatic tissue may help determine the etiology of hepatotoxicity of unknown cause (Davern et al, 2006; Bania et al, 1992).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients who require treatment with acetylcysteine are generally admitted to the hospital, although selected patients (presenting early with no evidence of liver injury) may be treated with acetylcysteine and managed in an emergency department observation unit.
    B) Patients with acute liver failure should be admitted to an ICU and may require transfer to a facility with liver transplant criteria (Dart et al, 2006).
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) For inadvertent ingestions in patients who are asymptomatic, children less than 6 years of age who have ingested less than 200 mg/kg, and all patients, 6 years or older, who have ingested less than 200 mg/kg or 10 g (whichever is less) may be managed at home.
    B) In a retrospective study of 2091 children aged 1 to 6 years referred to a health care facility for acute acetaminophen overdose, 866 had acetaminophen levels obtained (Bond et al, 1994). Of these, 3 fell into the "probable risk" range and 6 were in the "possible risk" range on the nomogram. A strategy that referred only those children who potentially ingested more than 200 mg/kg of an adult preparation identified all children with levels in the "probable risk" range.
    C) In a prospective study of 589 children referred to a health care facility after possibly ingesting greater than 140 mg/kg acetaminophen 538 had acetaminophen level obtained. Of these 241 ingested an unknown amount, 189 ingested between 140 and 200 milligrams/kilogram, 65 between 200 and 300 milligrams/kilogram, and 41 more than 300 milligrams/kilogram. Eighty-three percent received GI decontamination. Five children had toxic acetaminophen levels, 3 who ingested unknown amounts, and two who ingested 2,500 and 421 milligrams/kilogram respectively (Yerman et al, 1995).
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Contact your poison center for patients who have an unknown time of ingestion, and elevated serum transaminases or a detectable serum acetaminophen concentration. Contact a liver transplant center for patients with hepatic encephalopathy, acidosis, or severe coagulopathy.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) For inadvertent ingestions, children less than 6 years of age should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is 200 mg/kg or more, or if the amount ingested is unknown. For inadvertent ingestions, all patients, 6 years of age or older, should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is at least 200 mg/kg or 10 g, whichever is less, or if the amount ingested is unknown (Dart et al, 2006). All patients with deliberate ingestions, and all symptomatic patients, regardless of the amount ingested, should be referred to a healthcare facility.
    B) Patients who have nontoxic acetaminophen concentrations can be discharged with appropriate psychiatric care after an appropriate observation period.

Monitoring

    A) Patients who present early (within 8 hours of ingestion) only require a serum acetaminophen determination. In those patients who require acetylcysteine treatment, liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, and renal function should be monitored.
    B) Patients who present with an unknown time of ingestion or more than 8 hours after an ingestion should have a serum acetaminophen determination, electrolytes, renal function tests, liver enzymes and an INR.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) SUMMARY
    1) In a retrospective study of 2091 children aged 1 to 6 years referred to a health care facility for acute acetaminophen overdose, 866 had acetaminophen levels obtained. Of these, 3 fell into the "probable risk" range and 6 were in the "possible risk" range on the nomogram. A strategy that referred only those children who potentially ingested more than 200 mg/kg of an adult preparation identified all children with levels in the "probable risk" range (Bond et al, 1994).
    2) In a prospective study of 589 children referred to a health care facility after possibly ingesting greater than 140 mg/kg acetaminophen, 538 had acetaminophen level obtained. Of these 241 ingested an unknown amount, 189 ingested between 140 and 200 mg/kg, 65 between 200 and 300 mg/kg, and 41 more than 300 mg/kg. Eighty-three percent received gastrointestinal decontamination. Five children had toxic acetaminophen levels, 3 who ingested unknown amounts, and 2 who ingested 2500 and 421 mg/kg, respectively (Yerman et al, 1995).
    3) These two studies provide support for treating children, less than 6 years of age, who ingest less than 200 mg/kg at home and referring those with larger ingestions for hospital treatment. If this strategy is employed at home, treatment with activated charcoal should be considered for children with ingestions of 200 mg/kg or greater.
    4) For inadvertent ingestions, refer all patients 6 years of age or older to the hospital if the ingested amount is at least 200 mg/kg or 10 g (whichever is less), or the amount ingested is unknown. Acetaminophen serum level must be determined at 4 hours after ingestion or as soon as possible thereafter.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) PREHOSPITAL ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider prehospital administration of activated charcoal as an aqueous slurry in patients with a potentially toxic ingestion who are awake and able to protect their airway. Activated charcoal is most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion. Administration in the prehospital setting has the potential to significantly decrease the time from toxin ingestion to activated charcoal administration, although it has not been shown to affect outcome (Alaspaa et al, 2005; Thakore & Murphy, 2002; Spiller & Rogers, 2002).
    1) In patients who are at risk for the abrupt onset of seizures or mental status depression, activated charcoal should not be administered in the prehospital setting, due to the risk of aspiration in the event of spontaneous emesis.
    2) The addition of flavoring agents (cola drinks, chocolate milk, cherry syrup) to activated charcoal improves the palatability for children and may facilitate successful administration (Guenther Skokan et al, 2001; Dagnone et al, 2002).
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Administer activated charcoal to patients who present within a few hours of a potentially toxic acetaminophen ingestion. Activated charcoal does adsorb NAC, but there is no evidence that NAC efficacy is reduced in patients who have received charcoal. The NAC dose does NOT need to be changed in patients who receive activated charcoal.
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) CHARCOAL ADMINISTRATION
    a) Consider administration of activated charcoal after a potentially toxic ingestion (Chyka et al, 2005). Administer charcoal as an aqueous slurry; most effective when administered within one hour of ingestion.
    2) CHARCOAL DOSE
    a) Use a minimum of 240 milliliters of water per 30 grams charcoal (FDA, 1985). Optimum dose not established; usual dose is 25 to 100 grams in adults and adolescents; 25 to 50 grams in children aged 1 to 12 years (or 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram body weight) ; and 0.5 to 1 gram/kilogram in infants up to 1 year old (Chyka et al, 2005).
    1) Routine use of a cathartic with activated charcoal is NOT recommended as there is no evidence that cathartics reduce drug absorption and cathartics are known to cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, electrolyte imbalances and occasionally hypotension (None Listed, 2004).
    b) ADVERSE EFFECTS/CONTRAINDICATIONS
    1) Complications: emesis, aspiration (Chyka et al, 2005). Aspiration may be complicated by acute respiratory failure, ARDS, bronchiolitis obliterans or chronic lung disease (Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002; Pollack et al, 1981; Harris & Filandrinos, 1993; Elliot et al, 1989; Rau et al, 1988; Golej et al, 2001; Graff et al, 2002). Refer to the ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/TREATMENT management for further information.
    2) Contraindications: unprotected airway (increases risk/severity of aspiration) , nonfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, uncontrolled vomiting, and ingestion of most hydrocarbons (Chyka et al, 2005).
    3) EFFICACY
    a) Acetaminophen is well adsorbed by activated charcoal (Christophersen et al, 2002a; Hoegberg et al, 2002; Rose et al, 1991; Bainbridge et al, 1977; Van de Graff et al, 1982) and is most effective if given within one hour of ingestion of a liquid formulation (Anderson et al, 1999) or a tablet formulation (Christophersen et al, 2002). In normal volunteers, activated charcoal decreased the AUC of acetaminophen by 66% if administered one hour after acetaminophen ingestion (50 mg/kg) and by 22.7% when administered 2 hours after ingestion (Christophersen et al, 2002).
    b) A series of 981 acetaminophen poisonings were analyzed. Patients ingesting less than 10 grams had very low risk for developing toxic serum concentrations. Patients who had ingested 10 grams or more and presented within 24 hours and were administered activated charcoal were significantly less likely to have probable or high risk serum concentrations (Buckley et al, 1999).
    4) NAC AND CHARCOAL
    a) CONCLUSION: There is no reason to withhold activated charcoal in a patient with acetaminophen overdose. Activated charcoal may provide additional hepatoprotection in patients requiring NAC treatment for acetaminophen overdose.
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL HEPATOPROTECTION: In a prospective study of 122 patients with acetaminophen overdose requiring NAC therapy, hepatotoxicity (peak SGOT greater than 125 units/mL) developed in 4 of 82 patients receiving activated charcoal compared with 10 of 40 patients who did not receive activated charcoal. Timing of the administration of activated charcoal and NAC less than or more than 2 hours apart did not affect outcome (Spiller et al, 1994).
    1) A retrospective study analyzing the efficacy of activated charcoal with NAC in patients with acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity compared with administration of NAC alone also indicated a significant decrease in the number of patients with hepatotoxicity (AST/ALT greater than 100 and greater than 1000) in the AC plus NAC group (n=16,674), compared with the NAC alone group (n=23,199) (4.9% vs 14.2%; p less than 0.005; odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.34), suggesting a possible hepatoprotective effect (Spiller & Sawyer, 2007).
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Obtain a plasma level 4 hours after ingestion or as soon as possible thereafter. Patients with an initial level above the lower "treatment" line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram are at risk for delayed hepatotoxicity and should receive the full prophylactic NAC treatment regimen. Patients with subtoxic initial levels do not require NAC therapy.
    2) Do not delay NAC therapy for lack of a level in patients presenting 8 hours or more postingestion or if time of ingestion is unknown. Administer loading dose and discontinue if the level comes back below the treatment line. Protection from fatal hepatotoxicity is generally considered complete if NAC therapy is begun within 10 hours of ingestion (Daly et al, 2008; Clark, 1998).
    3) Patients presenting 24 hours or more after ingestion who have measurable acetaminophen levels or biochemical evidence of hepatotoxicity should receive NAC therapy.
    4) In patients who develop biochemical evidence of hepatotoxicity, NAC should be continued until hepatotoxicity improves.
    a) A retrospective study was conducted to determine if an AST/ALT ratio can indicate recovery from hepatotoxicity following acute acetaminophen poisoning. Analysis of cases of patients hospitalized with acetaminophen poisoning from 2001 to 2013 identified 37 patients who received NAC due to suspected severe acetaminophen poisoning and who had AST or ALT concentrations greater than 1000 International units/liter. Serial paired AST and ALT concentrations were recorded from each patient's hospital course. Each pair was classified as either post-peak or not, and AST/ALT ratios were calculated for each pair. After evaluating a total of 343 AST/ALT pairs for the 37 patients, it was determined that an AST/ALT ratio of 0.4 or less was 99% sensitive in identifying a patient whose transaminase concentrations were resolving, suggesting that for patients with no other hepatic failure indicators (eg, elevated INR, encephalopathy), the AST/ALT ratio may be a useful indicator of when to safely discontinue NAC treatment; however, further investigation is warranted (McGovern et al, 2015).
    B) ACETAMINOPHEN MEASUREMENT
    1) TIMING: The nomogram is used to interpret a single plasma level obtained between 4 and 24 hours after a single acute ingestion. Levels obtained before 4 hours or after 24 hours cannot be interpreted, nor can levels obtained after chronic overdose.
    a) Obtain a plasma acetaminophen level 4 or more hours after ingestion and plot it on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. Levels obtained prior to 4 hours may not represent peak plasma levels and CANNOT be used to predict hepatotoxicity and need for NAC therapy. Greatest accuracy is obtained with samples done between 4 and 12 hours.
    2) LIQUID PREPARATION: It is recommended that acetaminophen level measurements be taken at 2 hours following ingestions of the liquid formulations, with NAC treatment if levels are at or above 225 mg/L at 2 hours (Anderson et al, 1999).
    3) CO-INGESTANTS: Suicidal overdoses often involve multiple ingestions, which may alter the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen. Inaccurate histories of these overdoses are the general rule, and any patient "near" the treatment line in the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram should be treated (Clark, 1998).
    a) Ingestions of Tylenol(R) PM, which also contain diphenhydramine, have been reported to result in a delay in peak serum acetaminophen levels, most likely due to anticholinergic effects of diphenhydramine causing slowed gastric emptying (Tsang & Nadroo, 1999).
    b) Concomitantly ingested drugs (particularly those with anticholinergic or opioid effects) or foods may affect gastric emptying and time to peak plasma level. Additional levels may be needed to determine the peak (Linden & Rumack, 1984; Tighe & Walter, 1994; Gesell & Stephan, 1996; Tsang & Nadroo, 1999).
    4) CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM: Conflicting reports are found in the literature regarding whether or not a lower treatment line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram should be used for treating acute acetaminophen overdoses in chronic alcoholics. On the one hand, a review of the literature has shown in animal studies that a lower dose of acetaminophen is required to produce hepatotoxicity following chronic alcohol use due to induction of CYP enzymes and glutathione depletion. It is suggested that the animal results may apply to human cases, and some authors suggest a conservative guess of halving the dose/concentration for treatment (Buckley & Srinivasan, 2002). On the other hand, due to species differences in CYP expression, activity, and induction, results cannot always be extrapolated from animals to human cases. Also, a literature review does not conclusively substantiate that exposure to chronic excessive amounts of alcohol will predispose acetaminophen overdose patients to hepatotoxicity (Dargan & Jones, 2002).
    a) A number of investigators have suggested that chronic ethanol exposure increases the risk of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury. Conservative interpretation of acetaminophen levels in alcoholics has been recommended by some authors (Cheung et al, 1994; Seeff et al, 1986; Lauterburg & Velez, 1988).
    5) SUSTAINED-RELEASE PRODUCT: The interpretation of blood levels following overdose of sustained release products (Tylenol Extended Relief(R)) has not been studied. McNeil Consumer Products Co. recommends the following (McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, 2005):
    a) Obtain an initial plasma acetaminophen level 4 or more hours postingestion and an additional level 4 to 6 hours after the first level and plot them on the nomogram. If either level is above the possible risk line on the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, an entire course of NAC should be administered or, if initiated, completed. If both levels are below the possible risk line , then NAC therapy may be withheld or, if initiated, discontinued.
    6) LATE PRESENTATION
    a) After 24 hours postingestion, the presence of acetaminophen in the plasma may be documented, but interpretation of these levels is difficult. Because of increasing evidence of the beneficial effect of NAC instituted more than 24 hours after overdose, its use is recommended in patients presenting 24 hours or more postingestion who have measurable acetaminophen levels or biochemical evidence of hepatic injury (Parker et al, 1990; Harrison et al, 1990; Keays et al, 1991; Tucker, 1998; Buckley et al, 1999a).
    b) Certain serum acetaminophen assays are insensitive below 10 mcg/mL (greater than 66.16 Standard International Units (micromole/L)), rendering the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram invalid in patients who present greater than 19 hours after acetaminophen ingestion with no recordable levels. The authors recommend that these patients receive NAC therapy until 24 hours since the last acetaminophen ingestion, at which point it can be discontinued providing there is no detectable serum acetaminophen or clinical or biochemical evidence of hepatotoxicity (Donovan et al, 1999).
    c) In a population-based incidence and outcome study of acetaminophen poisoning, it was determined that atypical presenters, those whose risk cannot be estimated using the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, represented 44% of the hospitalized patients and 83% of those who suffered significant hepatic injury. This group represents patients with the poorest outcome (Bond & Hite, 1999).
    d) In late presenters following acetaminophen overdose, the best prognostic marker in established hepatotoxicity is the prothrombin time. Extended courses of NAC may be given until the prothrombin time improves (Jones, 2000).
    C) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE PROTOCOLS, SUMMARY
    a) The most common protocol used in the US for prevention of acetaminophen-induced liver injury after acute overdose is the 72-hour oral protocol. In addition, the 21-hour IV NAC protocol is available in the US. Outside the US, the 20-hour intravenous protocol (Prescott protocol) is most commonly used. In patients who develop hepatic injury, NAC therapy should be continued until hepatic function improves.
    2) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE, ORAL
    a) Patients receiving NAC therapy should meet the following criteria:
    1) Plasma acetaminophen level in the potentially toxic range on the nomogram supplied with POISINDEX(R) or Mucomyst(R) package insert, OR
    2) History of known or suspected acute ingestion of 10 g or 200 mg/kg or more acetaminophen if results of plasma levels cannot be obtained within 8 to 10 hours of ingestion, OR
    3) In patients presenting more than 24 hours after an acute ingestion who have measurable acetaminophen levels, the use of NAC should be strongly considered.
    1) TIME TO THERAPY: In patients with either a possible or probable risk for hepatotoxicity, as determined by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram, NAC therapy should be initiated within 8 to 10 hours of ingestion if possible (Wolf et al, 2007).
    a) NAC efficacy decreased progressively from 8 to 16 hours postingestion in a study of 2540 cases of acute acetaminophen overdose (Smilkstein et al, 1988).
    b) Studies have shown increases in hepatotoxicity from 2% to 41% (Prescott et al, 1979) and 7 to 29 percent (Rumack et al, 1981) if more than a 10 hour delay to treatment occurs. Also, 4.4% to 13.2% increases in hepatotoxicity were seen if more than an 8 hour delay to treatment occurred (Smilkstein et al, 1988).
    2) LOADING DOSE: Give 140 mg/kg NAC as a 5% solution.
    a) DILUTION: NAC is available as a 20% and 10% solution and should be diluted to 5% in a soft drink, juice, or water for oral or nasogastric administration:
    TABLE: NAC DOSE/PREPARATION 20% NAC
    BODY WEIGHT (kg) 20% NAC SOLUTION (mL) GRAMS DILUENT (mL)5% SOLUTION (Total mL)
    Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
    100 to 1097515225300
    90 to 997014210280
    80 to 896513195260
    70 to 795511165220
    60 to 695010150200
    50 to 59408120160
    40 to 49357105140
    30 to 3930690120
    20 to 292046080

    3) MAINTENANCE DOSE: 70 mg/kg every 4 hours, starting 4 hours after the loading dose, for a total of 17 doses.
    a) DILUTION:
    TABLE: NAC DOSE/PREPARATION 20% NAC
    BODY WEIGHT (kg) 20% NAC SOLUTION (mL) GRAMS DILUENT (mL)5% SOLUTION (Total mL)
    Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
    100 to 109377.5113150
    90 to 99357105140
    80 to 89336.597130
    70 to 79285.582110
    60 to 6925575100
    50 to 592046080
    40 to 49183.55270
    30 to 391534560
    20 to 291023040

    b) If the patient weighs less than 20 kg, calculate the dose of acetylcysteine. Each mL of 20% acetylcysteine solution contains 200 mg of acetylcysteine (Prod Info acetylcysteine oral solution, solution for inhalation, 2007).
    c) Maintenance doses may be discontinued if the INITIAL (4-hour) acetaminophen assay reveals a nontoxic level.
    d) In selected patients (not actively suicidal, deemed reliable to take medication and return for liver function tests, not requiring parenteral antiemetics, and without evidence of significant hepatotoxicity), outpatient therapy with oral NAC and careful follow-up may be a reasonable alternative (Dean & Krenzelok, 1994).
    e) In 131 cases of confirmed toxic acetaminophen poisoning, there were 6 patients who received 4 to 6 doses of NAC during hospitalization in one center, but were discharged to home with the remaining 11 to 13 doses. Follow-up at 1 to 3 weeks post-discharge determined dosing compliance to be 83%, suggesting that self-administration of NAC in the home setting may offer an acceptable alternative (Dean et al, 1996).
    b) EFFERVESCENT TABLET PREPARATION
    1) Effervescent tablets are for ORAL administration only; not for nebulization or intratracheal instillation (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    2) Once the tablet is dissolved, administer immediately. Once prepared for dilution, the effervescent formulation is interchangeable with 20% acetylcysteine solution, when given at the same dosage (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    3) ADULTS and PEDIATRICS: The recommended LOADING DOSE of this formulation is 140 mg/kg. MAINTENANCE DOSE is 70 mg/kg administered 4 hours after the loading dose, and repeated every 4 hours for a total of 17 doses (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    a) PATIENTS WEIGHING 1 TO 19 KG: Create a 50 mg/mL solution with two 2.5 gram tablets and 100 mL water and use an oral syringe to administer the appropriate dose (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    1) LOADING DOSE: Calculate the dose by multiplying the patient's kilogram weight by 140 mg/kg and divide by the concentration (50 mg/mL) of the solution. The resulting dose is in mL for administration via an oral syringe (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    2) MAINTENANCE DOSE: Calculate the dose by multiplying the patient's kilogram weight by 70 mg/kg and divide by the concentration (50 mg/mL) of the solution. The resulting dose is in mL for administration via an oral syringe (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    b) PATIENTS WEIGHING 20 TO 59 KG: Dissolve the tablet in 150 mL of water (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    c) PATIENTS WEIGHING 60 KG OR GREATER: Dissolve the tablet in 300 mL of water (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    d) PATIENTS WEIGHING OVER 100 KG: Limited information. No studies have been conducted to determine if dose adjustments are needed in patients weighing over 100 kg (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016).
    4) PATIENTS WEIGHING 20 KG or GREATER: Dissolve the appropriate number of 2.5-gram and/or 500-mg tablets in water according to the following table (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016):
    Loading Dose
    Dissolve in 300 mL Water
    Body Weight (kg)Acetylcysteine Dose to be Administered (grams)Number of Tablets to Dissolve in Water
    2.5 grams500 mg
    100 or greater1560
    90 to 991453
    80 to 891351
    70 to 791142
    60 to 691040
    Dissolve in 150 mL Water
    50 to 59831
    40 to 49724
    30 to 39622
    20 to 29413
    Maintenance Dose
    Dissolve in 300 mL Water
    Body Weight (kg)Acetylcysteine Dose to be Administered (grams)Number of Tablets to Dissolve in Water
    2.5 grams500 mg
    100 or greater7.530
    90 to 99724
    80 to 896.523
    70 to 795.521
    60 to 69520
    Dissolve in 150 mL Water
    50 to 59413
    40 to 493.512
    30 to 39311
    20 to 29204

    5) SODIUM CONTENT
    a) Cetylev(TM) tablets contain sodium, which may be a concern for patients with conditions sensitive to excess sodium intake (eg, congestive heart failure hypertension, renal impairment). The amount of sodium per tablet is as follows (Prod Info CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, 2016):
    1) 500 mg tablet: contains 320 mg sodium bicarbonate, of which 88 mg (3.8 mEq) is sodium.
    2) 2.5 g tablet: contains 1600 mg sodium bicarbonate, of which 438 mg (19 mEq) is sodium.
    c) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) SUMMARY: Common adverse reactions to oral NAC include vomiting and diarrhea. Rarely, generalized urticaria has been described (Heard, 2008; Charley et al, 1987; Bateman et al, 1984). There is one reported case of a serum sickness-like reaction (fever, arthralgias, thrombocytopenia, and rash) temporally associated with NAC therapy and relieved with diphenhydramine and discontinuation of NAC (Mohammed et al, 1994).
    2) PERSISTENT VOMITING: If any given dose is vomited within an hour of administration, the dose should be repeated. If recurrent vomiting develops, switch to the intravenous formulation.
    3) EFFICACY: Of 2540 patients treated with oral NAC, hepatotoxicity developed in 6.1% of patients with probable risk who began treatment within 10 hours of ingestion and 26.4% of those who began therapy between 10 and 24 hours following ingestion (Smilkstein et al, 1988).
    a) Probable risk was defined as initial plasma concentration above a line defined by 200 mcg/mL at 4 hours and 50 mcg/mL at 12 hours.
    b) Hepatotoxicity developed in 41% of the 283 patients who did not begin therapy until 16 to 24 hours after ingestion.
    c) A 7% incidence of liver damage was reported in 57 patients in whom therapy was begun within 10 hours of ingestion; a 29% incidence in 52 patients who began therapy 10 to 16 hours after ingestion; and a 62% incidence in 39 patients who began treatment 16 to 24 hours after ingestion (Rumack et al, 1981a).
    3) SHORTER ORAL NAC PROTOCOL
    a) A shorter duration of oral NAC has been recommended for acute acetaminophen overdoses presenting within 24 hours of ingestion. Several small studies suggest that oral NAC loading dose of 140 mg/kg followed by 70 mg/kg every 4 hours until the serum acetaminophen level is no longer detectable and aminotransferase levels are normal, is safe and effective (Betten et al, 2007; Tsai et al, 2005; Woo et al, 2000; Woo et al, 1995). Because of the shorter hospitalization and associated costs, this protocol may be preferable in patients presenting soon after an acute ingestion.
    1) STUDIES
    a) In a retrospective case series study (n=27), the efficacy of a patient-tailored NAC protocol was evaluated by comparing the incidence of hepatotoxicity in patients receiving this protocol (using the above dosing) with that in historical controls receiving 1 of 2 fixed-duration protocols (oral NAC for 72 hours and intravenous NAC for 20 hours within 8 to 10 hours of acute acetaminophen intoxication). Overall, the incidence of hepatotoxicity was low in patient-tailored NAC therapy and was comparable to that in historical controls (Tsai et al, 2005)
    b) In a retrospective study, 62 patients with acute acetaminophen overdose who presented within 24 hours of ingestion with normal liver function were treated with oral NAC 140-mg/kg loading dose followed by 70 mg/kg every 4 hours until the acetaminophen level was undetectable. Of these, 23 patients were treated for less than 24 hours, 17 were treated for between 24 and 36 hours and 22 were treated for between 37 and 63 hours. Five patients developed AST greater than 1000 units/L; two of these patients were treated within 10 hours of ingestion (Woo et al, 1995).
    c) In a prospective observational study, 250 consecutive acetaminophen overdose patients were evaluated to test the hypothesis that patients with normal AST and ALT levels determined 36 hours following the overdose do not subsequently develop liver damage with discontinuation of NAC. The average length of therapy was 36 hours, and follow-up in 90% revealed no subsequent liver damage when NAC was stopped at 36 hr (Roth et al, 1999).
    d) In a prospective case series (n=47) of acetaminophen toxic ingestions, all patients were treated with oral NAC for a minimum of 24 hours. In 79% of these cases (n=37), NAC was discontinued prior to 17 doses, with 49% of these patients receiving 6 NAC doses, 49% receiving 7 to 12 doses, and 3% receiving 13 to 16 doses. No adverse outcomes were reported following early NAC discontinuation (Clark et al, 2001).
    4) 21-HOUR IV NAC PROTOCOL
    a) This is the standard FDA-approved dosing regimen used in Europe (Prescott protocol). NAC is used for prophylaxis/prevention of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury. LOADING DOSE: 150 mg/kg in 200 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 60 minutes. MAINTENANCE DOSE: 50 mg/kg in 500 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 4 hours followed by 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL of 5% dextrose, infuse intravenously over 16 hours (Daly et al, 2008; Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006; Prescott et al, 1979).
    b) Acetadote(R) is available in 30-mL (200 mg/mL) single-dose glass vials(Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006).
    c) In patients who develop hepatic injury secondary to acetaminophen, NAC therapy should be continued until serum acetaminophen concentration is undetectable and liver function improves (Smith et al, 2008).
    Body WeightLoading Dose 150 mg/kg in 200 mL 5% Dextrose over 60 minutes
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022075
    9019867.5
    8017660
    7015452.5
    6013245
    5011037.5
    408830
    Body WeightSecond Dose 50 mg/kg in 500 mL 5% Dextrose over 4 hours
    (Kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022025
    9019822.5
    8017620
    7015417.5
    6013215
    5011012.5
    408810
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL 5% Dextrose over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022050
    9019845
    8017640
    7015435
    6013230
    5011025
    408820
    Body WeightSecond Dose 50 mg/kg in 500 mL 5% Dextrose over 4 hours
    (Kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022025
    9019822.5
    8017620
    7015417.5
    6013215
    5011012.5
    408810
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL 5% Dextrose over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022050
    9019845
    8017640
    7015435
    6013230
    5011025
    408820
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg in 1000 mL 5% Dextrose over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)
    10022050
    9019845
    8017640
    7015435
    6013230
    5011025
    408820

    d) To obtain more information, you can contact Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 1-866-767-5077.
    e) CASE REPORT: A 78-year-old man, with a past medical history of coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency, intentionally ingested approximately 48 g of acetaminophen (ninety-six (96) 500-mg tablets) over a 1-hour period. Baseline laboratory data, on hospital admission, revealed a serum creatinine of 3.4 mg/dL, but normal liver enzyme levels (AST, 8 units/L; ALT, 22 units/L), bilirubin level, and prothrombin time (13.5 seconds). A serum acetaminophen level, obtained 2.25 hours postingestion, was 264 mcg/mL. Intravenous NAC was initiated 5 hours postingestion and continued for 21 hours. Because of normal liver enzyme and bilirubin levels, NAC was discontinued after 21 hours of therapy despite a serum acetaminophen concentration of 116 mcg/mL at the time NAC was discontinued. Intravenous NAC was restarted 24 hours later, at which time the patient's AST and ALT levels were 395 and 453 units/liter, respectively. Over the next few days, AST and ALT levels peaked at 4350 and 5621 units/L and his PT was 51.4 seconds. IV NAC was continued until normalization of lab values. The authors conclude that because of a possibility of delayed and erratic absorption following massive acetaminophen overdose ingestions, it is recommended that intravenous NAC should be continued until serum acetaminophen concentrations are undetectable and liver function improves (Smith et al, 2008).
    f) COMPARISON OF NAC PROTOCOLS: A retrospective case review was conducted, comparing clinical outcomes of acetaminophen overdoses treated with either 20-hour IV NAC, 36-hour oral NAC, or 72-hour oral NAC. Primary outcomes that were measured included survival, liver transplant, and death. Secondary outcomes measured included development of grade III/IV hepatic encephalopathy, creatinine greater than 3.4 mg/dL, INR greater than 6.5, or a pH less than 7.3. Out of a total of 4642 cases of acetaminophen overdose reported to the Illinois Poison Center between 2002 and 2007, 795 cases were included in the study: 213 patients completed the 20-hour IV NAC protocol, 213 patients completed the 36-hour oral NAC protocol, and 369 patients completed the 72-hour oral NAC protocol. All patients had a single acute ingestion of acetaminophen, a known time of ingestion, a plasma acetaminophen concentration that was greater than 150 mcg/mL at 4 hours postingestion, and NAC treatment that was initiated within 8 hours postingestion. There were no occurrences of hepatic encephalopathy, elevated creatinine, or elevated INR within any of the 3 treatment groups. There were also no reported liver transplant cases or death in any of the 3 treatment groups. Acidosis (pH less than 3) was reported in 3 cases within the 20-hour IV treatment group and in 1 case within the 72-hour oral treatment group. However, based on the results of this study, 20-hour IV NAC protocol appeared to be as effective for acute acetaminophen poisoning when administered within 8 hours postingestion as the 36-hour and 72-hour oral NAC treatment regimens (Williamson et al, 2013).
    g) PEDIATRIC
    1) PRECAUTIONS: Standard intravenous dosing can cause hyponatremia and seizures secondary to large amounts of free water. To avoid this complication, the manufacturer has recommended the following dosing guideline (Prod Info ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, 2006):
    Body WeightLoading Dose 150 mg/kg over 60 minutes
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    306622.5100
    255518.75100
    20441560
    153311.2545
    10227.530
    Body WeightSecond Dose 50 mg/kg over 4 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    30667.5250
    25556.25250
    20445140
    15333.75105
    10222.570
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    306615500
    255512.5500
    204410280
    15337.5210
    10225140
    Body WeightSecond Dose 50 mg/kg over 4 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    30667.5250
    25556.25250
    20445140
    15333.75105
    10222.570
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    306615500
    255512.5500
    204410280
    15337.5210
    10225140
    Body WeightThird Dose 100 mg/kg over 16 hours
    (kg)(Ib)Acetadote(R) (mL)5% Dextrose or 1/2 normal saline (mL)
    306615500
    255512.5500
    204410280
    15337.5210
    10225140

    2) CASE REPORT: Approximately 9 hours after the initiation of 20-hour intravenous NAC therapy, a 3.5-year-old child (13 kg) with acetaminophen poisoning (level 1701 mcmol/L) developed hyponatremia (118 mmol/L) and tonic-clonic seizures; the 20-hour intravenous NAC protocol, as outlined by the manufacturer, suggested a loading dose of 11.25 mL of 20% NAC mixed with 40 mL of 5% dextrose for administration over 15 minutes and a maintenance infusion dose of 3.75 mL of NAC in 500 mL of 5% dextrose over 4 hours, followed by 7.5 mL of NAC in 1 L of 5% dextrose over 16 hours. Following supportive care, the child made a complete neurological recovery (Sung et al, 1997).
    3) If the protocol were completed, this patient would have received 1540 mL of 5% dextrose over 20.25 hours. The authors recommended that if the 20-hour IV protocol is chosen, instead of using an absolute volume in which to dilute the NAC, a final concentration of 40 mg/mL (1 mL of 20% NAC with 4 mL of diluent (5% dextrose) to obtain a final volume of 5 mL with a concentration of 40 mg/mL) should be used. This process will avoid both sudden decreases in serum sodium and fluid overload in small children (Sung et al, 1997).
    h) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS reported to the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee between January 1, 1979 and September 30, 1987 included: rash (26/30), pruritus (16/30), angioedema (9/30), nausea and vomiting (9/30), bronchospasm (8/30), tachycardia (4/30), hypotension (3/30), and hypertension (2/30). These adverse effects were also reported by the manufacturer (Prod Info Acetadote(R), 2004).
    2) TIMING: Average time to onset of adverse effect following NAC infusion was 30 minutes (range, 5 to 70 minutes) (Dawson et al, 1989). The most serious adverse reactions, which are dose-related, occur during or shortly after the loading dose. Slowing the rate of the NAC infusion loading dose (give over 30 to 60 minutes) may avoid some of the adverse reactions (Buckley et al, 1999a).
    3) Adverse reactions were reported in 8 of 56 (14%) Chinese patients treated with intravenous NAC by the European protocol. Rash was most likely to develop during the initial high dose infusion of NAC (6 of 7 patients with rash). One patient developed a fever (Chan & Critchley, 1994).
    4) ASTHMA: Patients with asthma are considered to be at increased risk for the development of adverse reactions to intravenous NAC (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 4.7) (Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2000).
    5) A randomized trial, conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects following an initial NAC dose infused over a period of 60 minutes compared with an infusion period of 15 minutes in patients with acetaminophen poisoning, demonstrated that there was no significant reduction in drug-related adverse effects with the 60-minute infusion. The incidence of NAC-related adverse effects was 45% (n=109) in the 15-minute group and 38% (n=71) in the 60-minute group (Kerr et al, 2005).
    i) ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS
    1) Monitor closely for bronchospasm or anaphylaxis during administration of the first dose of NAC. Asthmatics appear to be more likely to develop adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, to intravenous NAC than non-asthmatics (Daly et al, 2008; Schmidt & Dalhoff, 2000).
    2) Severe anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous NAC therapy following acetaminophen overdoses have been reported (Heard, 2008; Bonfiglio et al, 1992; Vale & Wheeler, 1982; Walton et al, 1979), one of which resulted in death (Anon, 1984).
    3) SYMPTOMS: Includes erythematous rash, itching, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dyspnea, and tachycardia. Acute bronchospasm has been reported in 2 asthmatic patients within 15 minutes of receiving the loading dose of intravenous NAC (Ho & Beilin, 1983). Abrupt respiratory arrest occurred in one asthmatic prior to completion of her loading dose of NAC (Reynard et al, 1992).
    4) INCIDENCE: In a non-randomized trial of 223 acute acetaminophen overdose patients, 32 (14.3%) experienced adverse reactions. Among the reactions, 91% were self-limited and consisted of transient erythema or mild urticaria (Smilkstein et al, 1991).
    5) TREATMENT GUIDELINES: Based on a 6-year, retrospective case series of hospitalized patients with anaphylactoid reactions to NAC, Guidelines were developed for the treatment of NAC anaphylactoid reactions (Bailey & McGuigan, 1998):
    1) Flushing: no treatment, continue NAC
    2) Urticaria: diphenhydramine, continue NAC
    3) Angioedema/respiratory symptoms: diphenhydramine, symptomatic care; stop NAC and restart 1 hr after diphenhydramine in the absence of symptoms
    a) In a prospective series of 50 patients with reactions to intravenous NAC (31 cutaneous, 19 systemic) treated using these guidelines, only one patient (whose treatment deviated from the guidelines) developed a recurrence of symptoms (Bailey & McGuigan, 1998).
    b) Anaphylactoid reactions may occur more frequently during the initial loading dose of NAC given in the emergency department. The risk of developing an anaphylactoid reaction appears to be lower with slower initial NAC infusion rates (60-minute vs 15-minute infusion rate); however, some patients may still develop reactions. Patients may tolerate repeat dosing at slower infusion rates when symptoms resolve and following administration of an antihistamine. If IV administration of NAC cannot be tolerated, oral dosing may be necessary (Pizon & LoVecchio, 2006).
    j) FACIAL FLUSHING
    1) Facial or chest flushing is common, beginning 15 to 75 minutes after initiation of infusion, and is associated with peak NAC plasma concentrations of 100 to 600 mcg/L (Donovan et al, 1988).
    k) PROTHROMBIN INDEX
    1) A decrease in the prothrombin index (which corresponds to an increase in prothrombin time or INR) has been reported following administration of IV NAC for treatment of patients with paracetamol poisoning who did not exhibit signs of hepatocellular injury. The time of the decrease appeared to be associated with the start of the NAC infusion instead of with the ingestion of paracetamol. Because prothrombin time is measured as a prognostic indicator in patients with paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning, the concern is that the decrease in prothrombin index may be misinterpreted as a sign of liver failure. The authors conclude that patient management decisions should not be based solely on the measurement of this value (Schmidt et al, 2002a; Pol & Lebray, 2002).
    l) DISCONTINUATION CRITERIA
    1) Discontinue intravenous acetylcysteine if a serious adverse reaction occurs.
    5) NAC IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC INJURY
    a) It is recommended that NAC be given to those patients who develop acetaminophen-associated hepatic failure but cannot be risk stratified by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram (Wolf et al, 2007).
    b) In patients with hepatotoxicity or hepatic failure prolonged courses of NAC therapy may be needed. NAC should be continued, using one of the above regimens, until clinical and biochemical markers of hepatic injury improve.
    1) NAC therapy (intravenous) was shown to improve clinical outcome (progression of hepatic encephalopathy and/or fatality) when administered between 12 and 36 hours postingestion in a retrospective study of 100 patients with fulminant hepatic failure from acetaminophen overdose (Harrison et al, 1990).
    a) Survival was increased and the incidence of cerebral edema, fever, and hypotension decreased in a group of patients with acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure in whom intravenous NAC was started 36 to 80 hours postingestion compared with untreated controls presenting 22 to 96 hours postingestion (Keays et al, 1991a).
    D) PATIENT CURRENTLY PREGNANT
    1) CONCLUSION: Pregnant overdose patients with a toxic concentration of acetaminophen should be treated with NAC and delivery should not be induced in attempts to prevent fetal acetaminophen toxicity.
    a) In a series of 4 pregnant patients who delivered while receiving NAC therapy for acetaminophen overdose, it was found that the mean cord blood (in one case with fetal demise cardiac blood was used) NAC level at the time of delivery was 9.4 mcg/mL, which is within the range normally seen in patients receiving therapeutic NAC (Horowitz et al, 1997). Administering NAC to the mother as soon as possible after the overdose is the most effective means of preventing hepatotoxicity in mother and fetus (Riggs et al, 1989).
    b) NAC therapy should be continued in the infant if delivered before the mother completes the entire course of therapy. Infants born with biochemical evidence of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury should continue to receive NAC until clinical and biochemical parameters improve.
    2) CASE REPORTS
    a) Sixty cases of acetaminophen overdose without evidence of teratogenesis have been reported. Twenty-four had serum levels above the nomogram line. Nine women had spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. One fetal death was recorded in the second and third trimesters. One third-trimester hepatotoxic patient delivered a 32 week stillborn during the course of NAC treatment. The plasma acetaminophen concentration in the stillborn was 360 mcg/mL (therapeutic range is 10 to 20 mcg/mL) and the autopsy showed massive hepatic necrosis (Riggs et al, 1989).
    3) The majority of pregnancy outcomes (81%) were normal in 48 cases of acetaminophen overdose during pregnancy (McElhatton et al, 1990).
    4) ANIMAL DATA: Fetal and neonatal liver cells have the ability to oxidize drugs during the first part of gestation and form reactive metabolites which could cause liver damage (Rollins et al, 1979). Therefore, the human fetus may be at risk from acetaminophen overdose.
    E) HEPATIC FAILURE
    1) Supportive measures should be instituted in the event that signs of hepatic failure develop. NAC therapy should be continued, using one of the above regimens, until biochemical and clinical evidence of hepatic injury improves.
    2) HEMOPERFUSION
    a) CONCLUSION: Although one study demonstrates an increased survival rate (16 of 23 patients) following early hemoperfusion, more controlled clinical studies need to be performed before this procedure can be considered a routine treatment for acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure (Gimson et al, 1982).
    3) ALBUMIN DIALYSIS
    a) A molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), which is a modified dialysis method using an albumin-containing dialysate that is recirculated and perfused online through charcoal and anion-exchange columns, has been used following a massive acetaminophen overdose in a patient with hepatic encephalopathy (grade II), severe acidosis, INR of 7, and hepatorenal syndrome. The patient was rejected for liver transplantation. Albumin dialysis allowed time for hepatic regeneration during conventional supportive care in this case. A course of 5 consecutive 8-hour treatments was performed (McIntyre et al, 2002; Mitzner et al, 2000).
    b) CASE REPORT: Single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) was successfully performed on a 41-year-old woman who developed hepatic failure following an acute acetaminophen overdose. Following ICU admission (hospital day 2), the patient had fulfilled King's criteria for transplantation (pH, 7.24; INR, 7.2; model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 40); however, she was deemed unsuitable for transplantation due to psychosocial comorbidities. Approximately 10 hours post-ICU admission, the patient was started on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration for management of lactic acidosis and oliguria. On hospital day 3, SPAD was started, consisting of 14 hours/day for 4 days and 1 day of 21 hours for a total of 77 hours. Prior to SPAD, ALT and AST levels peaked at 6828 and 15,721 units/L, respectively. Following the last day of treatment, ALT and AST levels decreased to 596 and 126 units/L, respectively, and her INR was 2.1. The patient gradually recovered and was discharged 46 days post-presentation without sequelae (Karvellas et al, 2008).
    4) EXTRACORPOREAL SORBENT-BASED DEVICES
    a) Acetaminophen-induced hepatitis or hepatic failure has been treated at 16 to 68 hours after an overdose for 4 to 6 hours with the Liver Dialysis System (a single-access hemodiabsorption system for treatment of serious drug overdose and for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy). During this treatment in 10 patients, acetaminophen levels dropped an average of 73%. If acetaminophen levels were still measurable in plasma, treatment was repeated 24 or 48 hours later. In this group, liver enzymes normalized 24 hours after the last treatment and no patient required a liver transplant. No adverse effects due to this treatment were noted (Ash et al, 2002).
    5) MODULAR EXTRACORPOREAL LIVER SUPPORT
    a) CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman, who underwent liver transplantation, developed primary nonfunctioning of the graft on postoperative day 4, with minimal bile output, discolored bile, coagulopathy, renal failure, and a grade IV coma requiring mechanical ventilation. Due to her deteriorating clinical condition, the patient was treated with modular extracorporeal liver support (MELS), consisting of a bioreactor that is charged with human liver cells and integrated into an extracorporeal circuit with continuous single pass albumin dialysis and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration. The human liver cells were obtained from a discarded cadaveric graft. After a total application time of 79 hours, the patient's plasma levels of total bilirubin and ammonia significantly decreased (21.1 mg/dL and 100 mcmol/L at start of therapy, respectively, to 10.1 mg/dL and 22.7 mcmol/L at end of therapy, respectively). Her kidney function also improved with a urine output of 1325 mL/24 hours at the end of therapy compared with 45 mL/24 hours prior to therapy, and her neurological status improved from a coma grade IV to a coma grade I allowing for extubation. On postoperative day 8, a suitable graft was found, MELS was stopped, and liver transplantation was performed. The patient's recovery was uneventful (Sauer et al, 2003). While there are currently no reports of the use of this system with acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure, it might be useful as a bridge to liver transplantation.
    6) TRANSPLANTATION
    a) Liver transplantation has a definite but limited role in the management of patients with hepatic failure from acetaminophen toxicity (Larsen et al, 1995; Makin et al, 1995).
    b) Of 14 patients with poor prognosis for survival after acetaminophen overdose who were registered for transplantation, 4 of 6 (67%) survived following transplant vs 1 of 8 (12.5%) who were not transplanted. Three of 15 (20%) control patients with similar prognosis who were not registered for transplantation survived (O'Grady et al, 1991).
    c) In another study of 17 patients with poor prognosis referred for liver transplant, 7 of 10 patients who received a liver transplant survived compared with 1 of 7 who did not receive a transplant (Mutimer et al, 1994).
    d) Reliable prognostic indicators for fatal outcome are needed, since those patients who recover without transplantation have complete recoveries(Harrison et al, 1990) (Tournaul et al, 1992).
    e) Acidosis (pH less than 7.3), a continuing rise in prothrombin time or INR on day 4, a peak prothrombin time of 180 seconds or more, and the combination of serum creatinine greater than 300 micromoles/Liter, PT greater than 100 seconds and grade III-IV encephalopathy have all shown strong correlations with fatal outcomes in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. Assuming a standard control PT of 15 seconds, then a peak International Normalized Ratio (INR) of approximately 12 or an INR greater than approximately 6.6 presumably have the same prognostic significance (Harrison et al, 1990a; O'Grady et al, 1988; O'Grady et al, 1989; Janes & Routledge, 1992; Vale, 1992; Mutimer et al, 1994).
    1) Others have not found these criteria to reliably predict fatal outcome in non-transplanted patients (Gow et al, 1997).
    2) APACHE II (Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation) is a multivariant scoring system that uses a list of vital signs and laboratories as well as premorbid health and age. One study found that an admission APACHE II score of 15 or more was associated with a mortality of 13 out of 20 patients (5 of the survivors received liver transplantation) (Mitchell et al, 1998).
    f) The use of arterial lactate concentration may allow for earlier identification of patients at high risk of fatal acetaminophen induced liver failure and likely to benefit from listing early for liver transplantation.
    1) In a retrospective study, an initial sample of 103 patients was identified followed by a prospective validation sample of 107 patients who had been transferred to a tertiary-referral intensive care unit for acetaminophen-induced liver failure. It was found that an early arterial lactate 4 hours after transfer (median of 43 hours after ingestion) above 3.5 mmol/L correlated with an increased risk of fatal outcome (14 of 18 patients meeting this criteria died; sensitivity 67%, specificity 95%). An arterial lactate concentration 12 hours after transfer and after adequate fluid resuscitation (guided by invasive hemodynamic monitoring) above 3 mmol/L also correlated with an increased risk of fatality (16 of 18 patients meeting this criteria died; sensitivity 76% specificity 87%). All patients had intracranial pressure monitoring as appropriate; norepinephrine was used as the primary vasopressor. NAC was infused at 150 mg/kg for 24 hours and continuous venovenous hemofiltration with lactate-free fluid was used for renal replacement. The authors have proposed criteria for liver transplantation in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure as follows:
    1) STRONGLY CONSIDER LISTING FOR TRANSPLANTATION IF arterial lactate concentration is greater than 3.5 mmol/L after early fluid resuscitation
    2) LIST FOR TRANSPLANTATION IF arterial pH is less than 7.3 mmol/L or arterial lactate concentration is greater than 3 mmol/L after adequate fluid resuscitation
    3) OR CONCURRENTLY IF serum creatinine is greater than 300 mcmol/L, INR is greater than 6.5 and there is encephalopathy of grade 3 or greater.
    g) Another study has seriously questioned the King's College lactate criteria for liver transplant. In a series of 40 patients who presented with acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), 2 patients received transplants. Nine patients died overall: 1 who had received a transplant, 6 who arrived moribund or developed severe cerebral edema soon after presentation and transplantation was never feasible, and 2 died without transplantation. Non-transplant survival in patients who met one or both of the King's College lactate criteria (early lactate greater than 3.5 or post resuscitation lactate greater than 3) was 68% in these patients. In a series of 56 FHF patients from a related center, non-transplant survival in patients who met one or both of the King's College lactate criteria was 62%. The authors suggest that improvements in the management of FHF (particularly the prevention of cerebral edema) may make liver transplantation in acetaminophen-induced FHF necessary less often than previously believed (Gow et al, 2007).
    h) A meta-analysis was conducted that compared the different prognostic criteria that were used to determine the need for liver transplantation in patients with fulminant hepatic failure secondary to acetaminophen poisoning. The criteria that was analyzed included King's criteria (pH less than 7.3 or a combination of prothrombin time (PT) of greater than 100 sec plus creatinine of greater than 300 mcmol/L plus encephalopathy grade 3 or greater), pH less than 7.3 only, PT greater than 100 sec only, PT greater than 100 sec plus creatinine greater than 300 mcmol/L plus encephalopathy grade 3 or greater, an increase in PT day 4, factor V of less than 10%, APACHE II score of greater than 15, and Gc-globulin less than 100 mg/L. Overall, in the meta-analysis, King's criteria had moderate sensitivity at 69% (range 55% to 100%), as compared with the other criteria analyzed, but it had high specificity at 92% (range 43% to 100%). Further analysis, utilizing Q values (a Q value of 1 reflects a perfect test and a Q value of 0.5 reflects an uninformative test) showed that the ability of the King's criteria to distinguish between patients requiring transplantation and those who do not seems limited, with a Q value of 0.61. However, using likelihood ratios, as an alternative method for evaluating the accuracies of diagnostic criteria (the greater the positive likelihood ratio and the lower the negative likelihood ratio, the better the criteria), the King's criteria had a positive:negative likelihood ratio of 12.33:0.29, indicating that it is a fairly accurate prognostic indicator. In comparison, the APACHE score greater than 15 criteria had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 92% on the first day of patient's admission. The APACHE criteria also had the highest positive and lowest negative likelihood ratios of any criteria analyzed in the meta-analysis (16.4:0.19); however, the APACHE criteria was evaluated in only one study. Because there was only one study available, the authors concluded that further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of APACHE II score criteria, and in the interim, King's criteria should be used as the standard criteria, despite its moderate sensitivity (Bailey et al, 2003).
    i) One study found a factor V concentration of less than 10% in patients with grade 3/4 encephalopathy and a factor VIII/factor V ratio greater than 30 to correlate with fatal outcome (Pereira et al, 1992). Another study found that, in a group of patients who did not all have grade 2 or 4 encephalopathy, these markers were not useful if measured less than 72 hours after overdose (Bradberry, 1994) (Bradberry et al, 1995).
    j) In a retrospective study of 21 patients who underwent liver transplant for acetaminophen-induced liver failure 16 survived to 2 months and 5 did not. In survivors the time from ingestion to transplant was shorter (4 days vs. 6 days in non-survivors) and the pH at the time of transplant was higher (7.38 vs. 7.21 in non-survivors). A pH below 7.3 at transplantation had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 94% for 2-month mortality (Devlin et al, 1995).
    k) A model was developed, based on a prospective and validated study, to predict hepatic encephalopathy in acetaminophen overdose and to identify high-risk patients for early transfer to a liver intensive care unit/transplantation facility. The most accurate model for encephalopathy included: log10 (hours from overdose to antidote treatment), log10 (plasma coagulation factors on admission), and platelet count x hours from overdose (chi-square=41.2; p less than 0.00001). Hepatic encephalopathy was not seen in patients treated within 18 hours after overdose (Schiodt et al, 1999).
    l) A variety of biochemical markers (ie, hemoglobin, pyruvate, calcium, and phenylalanine levels) were identified which were combined to form a prognostic model that, when applied to patients at hospital admission, appeared to accurately predict the outcome of patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The prognostic tool was derived used a cohort of 97 patients and prospectively validated with a second cohort of 86 patients admitted to the Scottish Liver Transplant Unit for acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Hemoglobin, pyruvate, and phenylalanine levels were significantly lower in patients who either subsequently died or underwent transplantation compared with patients who spontaneously survived. This prognostic model of outcome in acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure appears to be as accurate a predictor as utilizing King's College Hospital criteria, but at an earlier stage of the patient's condition (Dabos et al, 2005).
    1) Based on the prognostic model that was developed using stepwise forward logistic regression analysis the following formula was created to predict outcome:
    1) (400 x pyruvate mmol/L) + (50 x phenylalanine (mmol/L) - (4 x hemoglobin g/dL)
    m) PEDIATRIC PATIENTS: Based on a retrospective review of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in pediatric patients, the following indicators were associated with a poor prognosis and a need for liver transplantation (Mahadevan et al, 2006):
    1) Delayed presentation to the emergency department
    2) Delay in treatment
    3) Prothrombin time greater than 100 seconds
    4) Serum creatinine greater than 200 mcmol/L
    5) Hypoglycemia
    6) Metabolic acidosis
    7) Hepatic encephalopathy grade 3 or higher
    F) RENAL FAILURE SYNDROME
    1) CONTINUOUS HEMOFILTRATION may be preferable to intermittent hemodialysis in patients with acetaminophen induced hepatic and renal failure. Use of intermittent hemodialysis is associated with increases in intracranial pressure in these patients due to both cytotoxic and vasogenic cerebral edema. Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration was associated with a smaller increase from baseline ICP in a group of patients with acetaminophen induced hepatic and renal failure in one study (Davenport et al, 1991).
    2) Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration was used in a case of acetaminophen toxicity in an alcoholic patient presenting with liver and renal failure. Oral NAC therapy was initiated. Following aggressive supportive therapy, the patient recovered (Agarwal & Farber, 2002).
    G) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) MANGAFODIPIR: An in vivo study, involving mice, showed that intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg of mangafodipir 2 hours prior to administration of acetaminophen increased survival rates to 67% after 24 hours compared with a survival rate of 17% after 24 hours in mice following administration of a lethal dose of acetaminophen only (1000 mg/kg). The survival rate in mice pretreated with mangafodipir was equivalent to the survival rate of mice pretreated with NAC. Curative treatment with mangafodipir administered 6 hours after administration of 1000 mg/kg of acetaminophen resulted in a survival rate of 58% as compared with NAC administration which resulted in a survival rate of 8% (Bedda et al, 2003). Mangafodipir is a contrast agent currently used in MRI of the liver. It is believed that it has antioxidant activity and can prevent mitochondrial damage induced by reactive oxygen species.
    2) METHIONINE: Treatment with oral methionine has been compared with intravenous NAC and supportive care therapy in patients with acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. There is no evidence that oral methionine is more effective than IV NAC in preventing liver damage in patients with acetaminophen poisoning. However, one systematic review showed that oral methionine (2.5 grams every 4 hours for 4 doses) was more effective in preventing grade 3 hepatic necrosis (0/9 (0%)) in patients with acetaminophen poisoning compared with patients who only received supportive care (6/10 (60%)) (Buckley & Eddleston, 2004; Alsalim & Fadel, 2003).
    3) Constitutive androstane receptors (CAR) INHIBITORS: CARs have been shown to be key regulators of acetaminophen metabolism and hepatotoxicity. One study of CAR-null mice and wild type mice showed that exposure to CAR activators (ie, phenobarbital) as well as high doses of acetaminophen, resulted in hepatotoxicity in the wild-type mice, but not in the CAR-null mice. The CAR-null mice appeared to be resistant to acetaminophen toxicity. Administration of a CAR inhibitor, androstanol (an inverse agonist ligand), 1 hour following acetaminophen administration was effective in preventing hepatotoxicity in the wild type mice, indicating that CAR inhibitors may be an alternative method for treating acetaminophen toxicity, although further studies are warranted (Zhang et al, 2002).
    4) ANIMAL STUDY: Mice with acetaminophen-induced hepatic and renal injury, were given either NAC, orally or intraperitoneally, or ribose-cysteine, also orally or intraperitoneally, as rescue therapy, in order to determine the efficacy of thiol rescue therapy, particularly in the setting of acetaminophen-induced renal toxicity. Both treatment regimens demonstrated protection against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity, but only ribose-cysteine, administered intraperitoneally, was effective in protecting the mice against acetaminophen-induced renal toxicity as well. The authors conclude that other thiol rescue agents may have a therapeutic advantage over NAC administration in cases of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity; however, further studies are warranted (Slitt et al, 2004).

Enhanced Elimination

    A) SUMMARY
    1) Hemodialysis clears acetaminophen, but as acetylcysteine is an effective antidote, it is not routinely used.
    B) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Approximately 10% of the stated ingested dose was recovered after 6 to 8 hours of hemodialysis in a series of overdose patients (Farid et al, 1972). Hepatic necrosis was not prevented in 3 of 4 patients with initial toxic levels.
    2) If oliguric renal failure, refractory acidosis, or fluid and electrolyte changes occur, hemodialysis may be indicated (Hall & Rumack, 1986).
    3) Hemodialysis may be useful as an adjunct in treating hyperammonemia associated with hepatic encephalopathy or in patients with consistently elevated plasma acetaminophen levels (Williams, 1973).
    4) CASE REPORTS: Two patients with acute hepatotoxicity following multidrug overdose ingestions, including acetaminophen ingestion, recovered uneventfully following early treatment with hemodialysis. The first patient, a 61-year-old woman, presented with an initial acetaminophen level of 225 mcg/mL. Her AST and ALT levels were 1194 and 1223 International Units/L, respectively, and her creatinine level was 1.47 mg/dL. Acetaminophen's half-life and clearance, prior to hemodialysis, was 13.9 hours and 46.9 mL/min, respectively. Acetaminophen's half-life and clearance, with hemodialysis, was 4.6 hours and 160 mL/min, respectively. Her calculated clearance, due to hemodialysis, was 46.9 mL/min with an extraction ratio of 0.45. The second patient, a 44-year-old man, presented with an initial acetaminophen level of 495 mcg/mL. His AST and ALT levels were 579 and 1106 International Units/L, respectively, and a creatinine of 2.9 mg/dL. Acetaminophen's half-life and clearance, prior to hemodialysis, was 19.6 hours and 8.3 mL/min, respectively. With hemodialysis, acetaminophen's half-life and clearance was 7.3 hours and 183 mL/min, respectively. His calculated clearance, due to hemodialysis, was 116 mL/min, with an extraction ratio of 0.58 (Murphy et al, 2015).
    C) HEMOPERFUSION
    1) Hemoperfusion removes only small amounts of acetaminophen from the body and has not been shown to be of benefit in overdose (Gazzard et al, 1974).
    2) Patients presenting early after ingestion have been shown to do well with NAC therapy and are unlikely to benefit from hemoperfusion, even after extremely large ingestions (Smilkstein et al, 1989a). Late hemoperfusion is not likely to be of benefit since the toxic metabolites are intrahepatic and are not likely to be removed by hemoperfusion.

Case Reports

    A) ADULT
    1) ACUTE RENAL FAILURE: A 19-year-old woman ingested 42.5 grams of acetaminophen; she presented one hour afterwards with headache, nausea, abdominal pain, and lethargy. Initial serum acetaminophen levels were 143 mcg/mL. Serum liver enzymes were elevated and treatment with NAC was started. On the fifth day of admission, serum laboratory results revealed an acetaminophen-induced non-oliguric acute tubular necrosis. Serum creatinine peaked at 4.4 mg/dL on day 5. The patient's hepatotoxicity (without liver failure) complicated by acute renal failure resolved by day 17 with symptomatic therapy and NAC, and the patient was discharged (Alkhuja et al, 2001).
    2) ALLERGY: A 46-year-old woman developed a generalized pruritic rash and cyanosis of the extremities after taking 10 mg metoclopramide, 4 mg loperamide, and 500 mg acetaminophen. Symptoms improved with dexamethasone and antihistamine. Pruritus, dyspnea, angioedema and erythema of both legs recurred on rechallenge with a different formulation of acetaminophen (Diem & Grilliat, 1990).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: ORAL: Ingestions of 200 mg/kg or 10 g, whichever is less, are considered potentially toxic. PEDIATRIC (less than 6 years of age): ORAL: For inadvertent ingestions, pediatric patients, less than 6 years of age, should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is 200 mg/kg or more, or if the amount ingested is unknown. IV: A 10 fold overdose caused hepatotoxicity in a chronically malnourished child.
    B) THERAPEUTIC DOSE: ADULT: Oral: 650 to 1000 mg every 4 hours up to 4 g/day. IV: (50 kg or greater): 650 to 1000 mg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 4 g/day; (less than 50 kg): 12.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 3750 mg/day (75 mg/kg/day). PEDIATRIC: Oral: 10 to 15 mg/kg every 4 hours up to 60 mg/kg/day. IV: 12.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg every 4 to 6 hours, up to 75 mg/kg/day.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) INTRAVENOUS
    a) WEIGHT OF 50 KG OR MORE: The recommended dose is 1000 mg every 6 hours or 650 mg every 4 hours; may be administered as a single or repeated dose; minimum dosing interval is 4 hours; maximum single dose is 1000 mg; maximum daily dose is 4000 mg/24 hours (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    b) WEIGHT OF LESS THAN 50 KG: The recommended dose is 15 mg/kg every 6 hours or 12.5 mg/kg every 4 hours; may be administered as a single or repeated dose; minimum dosing interval is 4 hours; maximum single dose is 15 mg/kg or 750 mg; maximum daily dose is 75 mg/kg/day or 3750 mg/24 hours (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) ORAL
    a) For analgesia and antipyresis, the recommended oral dose is 650 to 1000 milligrams every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum of 4 grams/day (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) REGULAR STRENGTH oral tablets, 2007; Prod Info TYLENOL(R) EXTRA STRENGTH chewable oral tablets, oral tablets, rapid-release oral gelcaps, oral geltabs, oral caplets, oral cool caplets, oral liquid, 2007).
    3) RECTAL
    a) For analgesia and antipyresis, the recommended dose is 650 milligrams administered as a rectal suppository every 4 to 6 hours is recommended, not to exceed 4 grams in 24 hours (Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006).
    7.2.2) PEDIATRIC
    A) ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
    1) INTRAVENOUS
    a) 2 to 12 years: The recommended dose is 15 mg/kg every 6 hours or 12.5 mg/kg every 4 hours; may be administered as a single or repeated dose; minimum dosing interval is 4 hours; maximum single dose is 15 mg/kg or 750 mg; maximum daily dose is 75 mg/kg/day or 3750 mg/24 hours (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    b) 13 years or older and weighing less than 50 kg: The recommended dose is 15 mg/kg every 6 hours or 12.5 mg/kg every 4 hours; may be administered as a single or repeated dose; minimum dosing interval is 4 hours; maximum single dose is 15 mg/kg or 750 mg; maximum daily dose is 75 mg/kg/day or 3750 mg/24 hours (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    c) 13 years or older and weighing 50 kg or more: The recommended dose is 1000 mg every 6 hours or 650 mg every 4 hours; may be administered as a single or repeated dose; minimum dosing interval is 4 hours; maximum single dose is 1000 mg; maximum daily dose is 4000 mg/24 hours (Prod Info OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, 2013).
    2) ORAL
    a) Infants and children (less than 60 kg): The recommended dose is 10 to 15 mg/kg orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 75 mg/kg/day for infants and lesser of 100 mg/kg/day or 4 g/day in children (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Kramer et al, 2008; Kleiber, 2008; Autret-Leca et al, 2007; Playfor et al, 2006; Bauman & McManus, 2005; Goldman et al, 2004; Perrott et al, 2004; Berde & Sethna, 2002; Litalien & Jacqz-Aigrain, 2001; Cranswick & Coghlan, 2000).
    b) 2 to 3 years: The recommended dose is 160 milligrams (mg) orally every 4 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/24 hours (Prod Info acetaminophen oral suspension, 2006).
    c) 4 to 5 years: The recommended dose is 240 milligrams orally every 4 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 1.2 grams/24 hours (Prod Info CHILDREN'S TYLENOL(R) oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension, 2007).
    d) 6 to 8 years: The recommended dose is 320 milligrams orally every 4 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 1.6 grams/24 hours (Prod Info CHILDREN'S TYLENOL(R) oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension, 2007).
    e) 9 to 10 years: The recommended dose is 400 milligrams orally every 4 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 2 grams/24 hours (Prod Info CHILDREN'S TYLENOL(R) oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension, 2007).
    f) 11 years: The recommended dose is 480 milligrams orally every 4 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 2.4 grams/24 hours (Prod Info CHILDREN'S TYLENOL(R) oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension, 2007).
    g) 12 years and older (60 kg or greater): The recommended dose is 650 to 1000 milligrams orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 4 grams/24 hours (Prod Info TYLENOL(R) REGULAR STRENGTH oral tablets, 2007; Prod Info TYLENOL(R) EXTRA STRENGTH chewable oral tablets, oral tablets, rapid-release oral gelcaps, oral geltabs, oral caplets, oral cool caplets, oral liquid, 2007; Playfor et al, 2006; Greco & Berde, 2005; Berde & Sethna, 2002).
    3) RECTAL
    a) Infants and children (less than 60 kg): The recommended dose is 10 to 20 mg/kg rectally every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 75 mg/kg/day for infants and lesser of 100 mg/kg/day or 4 g/day in children. A loading dose of 25 to 45 mg/kg (maximum 1000 mg) may also be given prior to maintenance dosing (Kraemer & Rose, 2009; Kleiber, 2008; Bauman & McManus, 2005; Litalien & Jacqz-Aigrain, 2001; Cranswick & Coghlan, 2000)
    b) TERM INFANTS: The recommended starting dose is 30 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) followed by 20 mg/kg every 6 to 8 hours, not to exceed a maximum daily dose of 90 mg/kg in term infants (Van Lingen et al, 1999).
    c) 3 to 6 years: The recommended dose is 120 milligrams (mg), administered as a rectal suppository, every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 720 mg/24 hours (Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006).
    d) 6 to 12 years: The recommended dose is 325 milligrams, administered as a rectal suppository, every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 2 grams/24 hours (Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006).
    e) 12 years and older (greater than 60 kg): The recommended dose is 650 milligrams, administered as a rectal suppository, every 4 to 6 hours as needed, up to a maximum dose of 4 grams/24 hours (Prod Info ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, 2006; Playfor et al, 2006).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) CASE REPORTS
    1) Of 11,195 cases of suspected acetaminophen overdose, 50 died, all adults. In 28 of these cases death could be definitely or probably attributed to acetaminophen. Mortality was significantly higher in patients who received NAC more than 16 hours postingestion (8/479 (1.67%) of those with toxic acetaminophen levels) than in those who received NAC within 16 hours (2 of 1559 (0.13%) with toxic acetaminophen levels) (Smilkstein et al, 1988).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) ACUTE INGESTION: Prediction of toxicity based on the patient's history is unreliable.
    a) Ingestions of 200 mg/kg OR 10 g WHICHEVER IS LESS are considered potentially toxic (Dart et al, 2006).
    b) Significant toxicity can develop following adult ingestions of greater than 150 mg/kg (Hendrickson & Bizovi, 2008; Prescott, 1983) .
    B) PEDIATRIC
    1) ORAL
    a) For inadvertent ingestions, children less than 6 years of age should be referred to a healthcare facility if the amount ingested is 200 mg/kg or more, or if the amount ingested is unknown. Acetaminophen serum concentration must be determined at 4 hours after ingestion or as soon as possible thereafter. Alcoholic or malnourished patients may be at risk at lower doses (Dart et al, 2006).
    b) The table below indicates the maximum number of dosage units of acetaminophen a person might ingest to be at or below 200 mg/kg of body weight.
    NUMBER OF DOSES OF ACETAMINOPHEN EQUIVALENT TO 200 MG/KG
    AGEAVERAGE WEIGHT (kg) AVAILABLE DOSAGE FORM
    80 mg120 mg160 mg325 mg500 mg
    less than 1 mo3.2585421
    1 mo4107532
    3 mo5.71410742
    6 mo7.51913953
    9 mo8.922151164
    12 mo1025171364
    18 mo1128181474
    2 yr1230201575
    3 yr1435231896
    4 yr16402720106
    5 yr18453023117
    6 yr20503325128
    7 yr22553728149
    8 yr256342311510
    9 yr287047351711
    10 yr328053402013
    12 yr4010067502516
    14 yr5012583633120

    c) ASSUMPTIONS
    1) The age-weight relationship is the result of the average of the 50th percentile weight for boys and girls at the given age (Behrman & Vaughn, 1983).
    2) Example of dosage units are: 120-mg tablet, 120-mg wafer, 120-mg suppository, 120-mg/5 mL elixir, 120-mg/2.5 mL solution
    d) HOW TO USE THE CHART
    1) An 18-month-old, 11-kg child was estimated to have ingested 45 mL of a solution of acetaminophen containing 120 mg/2.5 mL by history. Is this child above or below the 200 mg/kg threshold?
    2) Find 11 kg under weight column, read across to 120-mg dosage form = 18 dosage units. Eighteen dosage units x 2.5 mL/dosage unit = 45 mL
    a) INTERPRETATION: Ingestion of 45 mL of acetaminophen solution (120 mg/2.5 mL) is equivalent to approximately 200 mg/kg in an 11-kg child.
    e) It has been presumed that an acute acetaminophen dose of 200 milligrams/kilogram in children is a toxic dose, capable of producing liver toxicity. It is postulated that a toxic dose for a 5-year-old child, based on liver size ratio compared with an adult, to be 187.5 mg/kg. Predicted toxic dose for a younger child would be even higher. The author suggests raising the previously accepted toxic dose of 150 mg/kg for children less than 6 years old and thus decreasing the number of patients receiving gastrointestinal decontamination and serum concentration determinations (Tenenbein, 2001).
    f) Of 417 pediatric acetaminophen overdoses, 55 (13%) had toxic plasma levels, resulting in hepatotoxicity (SGOT greater than 1000 units/L) in 3 (5.5%).
    g) COMPARISON WITH ADULTS: A comparison with 639 adult cases showed toxic levels in 23.2% and hepatotoxicity in 29% of those (Rumack, 1984). The increased glutathione turnover rate in children may result in greater detoxification of acetaminophen.
    h) In a prospective, observational study (n=1019) of acute pediatric overdose ingestions of acetaminophen (excluding extended-release preparations) of up to 200 mg/kg, it was found that with home monitoring alone these patients do not develop signs or symptoms of hepatic injury at 72-hour follow-up (Mohler et al, 2000).
    i) CASE REPORT: An 18-month-old child developed metabolic acidosis (pH 7.14; PvCO2, 35; base excess, -17) after ingesting twenty (20) 500-mg acetaminophen capsules (total dose 10 g). Except for a mild elevation of her AST level, there was no evidence of hepatotoxicity. Following administration of NAC and sodium bicarbonate, the patient completely recovered, without sequelae, approximately 20 hours postingestion (Steelman et al, 2004).
    2) INTRAVENOUS
    a) CASE REPORT: A 5-month-old child, with intussusception, received intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg following surgery. Eight hours later, the patient inadvertently received an intravenous paracetamol dose of 75 mg/kg (520 mg). She did not receive N-acetylcysteine (NAC) initially and, within 24 hours, developed elevated liver enzyme concentrations (peak ALT 2819 international units/L and peak AST 4294 international units/L at 48 hours after overdose). NAC was initiated 24 hours after the overdose, and the patient's liver enzymes gradually improved. She was discharged 2 days later. This patient's liver injury was not completely consistent with APAP-induced hepatotoxicity, as the bilirubin was elevated (29 micromol/L) at 6 hours after the overdose (normal alkaline phosphatase and ALT at that time). Another infant (6-months-old), who underwent inguinal hernia repair, inadvertently received 300 mg paracetamol (75.8 mg/kg) intravenously instead of the intended 30 mg. The patient immediately received NAC continuously for 20 hours, remained asymptomatic with normal liver enzymes, and was discharged 30 hours post-operatively (Beringer et al, 2011).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 36-month-old chronically malnourished child, weighing 10 kg, developed hepatotoxicity (peak AST 1353 units/L and ALT 1378 units/L 48 hours after overdose) after inadvertently receiving 1500 mg (150 mg/kg) of IV paracetamol, instead of the prescribed dose of 150 mg (15 mg/kg). The patient recovered after receiving the standard dosing regimen of IV N-acetylcysteine, and was discharged 132 hours post-overdose (Berling et al, 2012).
    C) ADULT
    1) CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old man intentionally ingested 15 to 25 hydrocodone/acetaminophen tablets (5 mg/500 mg) and presented to the emergency department 16 hours postingestion after experiencing persistent nausea and vomiting. His acetaminophen concentration, at the time of presentation, was less than 10 mcg/mL and his liver enzyme concentrations were normal (AST 31 units/L (reference range, 0 to 40 units/L), ALT 34 units/L (reference range, 0 to 40 units/L)). At this time, he was transferred to an inpatient psychiatric unit where he continued to experience nausea and vomiting as well as diffuse abdominal pain. Approximately 29 and 36 hours postingestion, repeat laboratory analyses revealed an acetaminophen concentration of less than 10 mcg/mL and an AST of 45 and 150, respectively, and an ALT of 61 and 204, respectively. Due to increasing transaminase concentrations and persistent nausea and abdominal pain over the next 2 days, IV NAC was administered for 16 hours. The patient's liver enzyme concentrations decreased with complete symptom resolution approximately 77 hours postingestion (Bebarta et al, 2014).
    2) CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman presented to the hospital following an intentional ingestion of 11 g of paracetamol (196 mg/kg). A paracetamol concentration, obtained 4 hours postingestion, was 129 mg/L, and IV NAC was administered. Within 36 hours postingestion, the patient developed jaundice (total bilirubin 145 mcmol [baseline 35 mcmol]), but liver enzymes and prothrombin time were normal. A complete blood count indicated mild anemia (hemoglobin 96 g/L) and further analysis of the bilirubin determined it to be primarily unconjugated, suggesting the development of hemolysis with a presentation of significant jaundice secondary to paracetamol overdose. Further investigation of the patient revealed that she was G6PD-deficient. Four days postingestion, the patient's elevated bilirubin concentration began to decrease (42 mcmol) (Phillpotts et al, 2014).
    3) CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman with a history of G6PD deficiency presented approximately 12 hours after an intentional acute ingestion of 10 g acetaminophen. Laboratory data revealed an acetaminophen level of 72.3 mcg/mL, a hemoglobin level of 13.6 g/dL, a mildly elevated ALT, and evidence of indirect bilirubinemia. The patient was started on an IV acetylcysteine infusion. Forty-two hours later, repeat laboratory data demonstrated AST and ALT levels of 9118 and 8796 International Units/L, an INR of 3.4, a haptoglobin level of 25 mg/dL, a LDH level of 2250 International Units/L, an unconjugated bilirubin level of 6.9 mg/dL, a total bilirubin level of 10.1 mg/dL, and her urinalysis revealed bilirubinuria without hematuria, all of which is consistent with hemolytic anemia. A repeat serum acetaminophen level was negative. Although her liver function and INR improved over the next 4 days, her anemia worsened, with her hemoglobin level decreasing to a nadir of 8.6 g/dL (Rickner & Simpson, 2015).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) GENERAL
    a) In patients treated with oral NAC more than 8 hours post-ingestion, plasma acetaminophen levels were predictive of hepatotoxicity in a study of 2540 acute acetaminophen overdoses.
    b) Of patients with a level corresponding to a 4-hour level of 200 to 400 mcg/mL on the nomogram, 26.7% developed a peak SGOT of greater than 1000 units/L when treatment was delayed more than 16 hours (Smilkstein et al, 1988).
    c) A blood acetaminophen concentration of 15 micromoles/liter (2.26 mcg/mL) 13 hours post-ingestion was associated with the development of liver and renal toxicity in a woman being treated with isoniazid (Murphy et al, 1990).
    d) TERM INFANT: A 2.88-kg term infant had an acetaminophen serum level of 133 mg/L at 6 hours after delivery. The mother had ingested 20 g of acetaminophen 3 hours prior to delivery. The infant's INR decreased from 3 to 0.94 and serum acetaminophen decreased to less than 0.1 mg/L over 48 hours following therapy with NAC infusion (Aw et al, 1999).
    e) POSTMORTEM CONCENTRATIONS: The postmortem tissue and body fluid concentrations in 2 patients, a 39-year-old man (case #1) and an 18-year-old woman (case #2), who were found dead at home following intentional ingestions of unknown amounts acetaminophen and who did not have evidence of centrilobular hepatic necrosis on autopsy, are as follows (Singer et al, 2007):
    Specimen Case #1 Case #2
    Femoral blood (mg/L) 1280-
    Cardiac blood (mg/L) - 1220
    Vitreous (mg/L) 878 779
    Liver (mg/kg) 729 3260
    Urine (mg/L) 1500 1780
    Stomach contents (mg) 486 11,500

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS103-90-2 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Not Listed

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS103-90-2 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Not Listed

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS103-90-2 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): Not Listed
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): Not Listed
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 3 ; Listed as: Paracetamol (Acetaminophen)
    a) 3 : The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans. This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category.
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Not Listed
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Not Listed
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS103-90-2 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) ANIMAL DATA
    1) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 338 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    2) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 310 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))
    3) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 1944 mg/kg ((RTECS, 2000))

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Acetaminophen is used primarily for its antipyretic and analgesic effects, which are mediated via the central nervous system. Acetaminophen does not have the antiinflammatory activity of the salicylates.

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) HEPATIC: In acetaminophen overdose, the glucuronidation and sulfation pathways become saturated and metabolism by P450 increases. This increases the production of a highly reactive metabolite, N- acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI), that rapidly exhausts the natural protective stores of cellular glutathione (Davis et al, 1976; Corcoran et al, 1980).
    1) When approximately 70% of glutathione stores are depleted, NAPQI binds covalently with the protein macromolecules in the hepatocytes and cause cell death and zone 3 (centrilobular or distal acinar) degeneration of the liver (Mitchell et al, 1974; Prescott & Critchley, 1983).
    2) In humans, the hepatic supply of reduced glutathione and 3-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate starts to be depleted after administration of 0.5 to 3 grams acetaminophen (Slattery et al, 1987).
    3) ANIMAL/IN VITRO STUDIES: In acetaminophen-toxic mice, anti-acetaminophen antibodies are initially located in cells proximal to the central vein, indicating that damage started there, and then spread out through zone 3 (centrilobular or distal acinar). Investigators purified a 58-kilodalton protein from mice with acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. This protein was identified with an affinity purified antibody to acetaminophen adducts, and was found only in damaged tissues (Bartolone et al, 1989a).
    4) FREE RADICAL INJURY: Based on an in-vitro study of cultured hepatocytes, it was postulated that hydroxyl radicals generated by an iron catalyzed Haber-Weiss reaction mediate the cell injury produced by acetaminophen (Kyle et al, 1987).
    a) Deferoxamine decreased acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity, mortality and depressed malonaldehyde formation without affecting glutathione depletion or reducing covalent binding of acetaminophen to liver proteins in a rat model. This suggests that acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity is related to free radical injury catalyzed by iron (Sakaida et al, 1995).
    5) SECONDARY INJURY: Secondary microcirculatory changes (neutrophil activation and microvascular plugging) that exacerbate the original acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury and extend necrosis through ischemic infarction of the periacinar region has been proposed as a mechanism of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity (Jaeschke & Mitchell, 1989).
    a) It is also speculated that a potent antioxidant such as NAC may protect through an action on neutrophils to restore microcirculatory blood flow (Mitchell, 1988).
    b) In a rat model, pretreatment with drugs which interfere with macrophage function prevented acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity without affecting acetaminophen metabolism, suggesting that macrophages contribute to acetaminophen-induced hepatic necrosis (Laskin et al, 1995).
    6) PROSTAGLANDINS: Mice treated with xylitol or sodium chloride (to stimulate prostaglandin synthesis) after overdose with 400 mg/kg acetaminophen developed increased ALT and AST, and reduced hepatic glutathione.
    a) Aspirin (25 mg/kg) and indomethacin (10 mg/kg), cyclooxygenase inhibitors, were found to be hepatoprotective in mice (Ben-Zvi et al, 1990).
    7) MITOCHONDRIAL RESPIRATION: It was found that both acetaminophen and NAPQI were independently capable of inhibiting mitochondrial respiration in rats (Esterline & Ji, 1989).
    a) NAPQI caused nonspecific, irreversible damage while acetaminophen was specific for NAD-linked mitochondrial substrates, was unaffected by hepatic glutathione levels, and was readily reversible.
    b) Clinical effects in these rats due to inhibited mitochondrial respiration included metabolic acidosis, hyperglycemia and coma (Esterline & Ji, 1989).
    8) CYTOCHROMES: An in vitro study of highly purified rat liver P450 enzymes showed that certain cytochromes were primarily responsible for formation of specific reactive metabolites (Harvison et al, 1988).
    a) Cytochrome P450UT-A, present only in male rats, catalyzed reactive intermediate formation 25 times faster than the female-specific cytochrome, which may explain the increased sensitivity of male rats to acetaminophen compared with females.
    b) NAPQI was formed at significantly higher rates by isoenzymes not inducible by phenobarbital, suggesting that NAPQI and 3-hydroxyacetaminophen are not formed from a common intermediate.
    9) CALCIUM REGULATION: Interference in hepatic calcium regulation is reported as an early event that occurs in mice that may contribute to acetaminophen-induced injury and cell death (Corcoran et al, 1987).
    B) RENAL: It was found that therapeutic acetaminophen administration to 27 volunteers reversibly reduced serum thromboxane B2 for at least 4 hours after ingestion. The data also suggested that acetaminophen affected renal excretion of prostaglandin E2, especially in patients with renal insufficiency (Berg et al, 1990).
    1) ANIMAL STUDY: Administration of acetaminophen (600 mg/kg orally) to mice resulted in proximal tubular necrosis. The mechanism was postulated to be most dependent on cytochrome P450 activation and subsequent covalent binding of reactive metabolites (Emeigh Hart et al, 1991).
    C) ACIDOSIS and COMA: It has been speculated that high anion gap metabolic acidosis and impaired consciousness level may be due to (1) inhibition of the mitochondrial aerobic metabolism by uncoupling of site I and II on the electron transport or through covalent binding of essential mitochondrial enzymes, or (2) a transient acquired pyroglutamic acidemia (5-oxoprolinuria) via a mechanism of depletion of liver glutathione stores that affects the gamma-glutamyl cycle (Al-Jubouri, 1999).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Acetaminophen exists as white, odorless, bitter tasting crystals or crystalline powder (Prod Info acetaminophen, codeine phosphate oral solution, 2006) that is freely soluble in alcohol and in propylene glycol, soluble in acetone and in boiling water, very slightly soluble in chloroform, and sparingly soluble in glycerol and water (JEF Reynolds , 1991). It has an osmolality of approximately 290 mOsm/kg (Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010).

Ph

    A) approximately 5.5 (Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010)

Molecular Weight

    A) 151.16 (Prod Info OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, 2010)

Clinical Effects

    11.1.3) CANINE/DOG
    A) Signs develop within one to two hours of ingestion and are progressive, consisting of anorexia, salivation, vomiting, hypovolemia, methemoglobinemia, depression, hematuria or hemoglobinuria, and edema of the face and/or paws.
    B) Muscle tremors or rarely seizures may occur in dogs, possibly through triggering of latent epilepsy. Signs may persist 12 to 48 hours. Acute hepatic failure may follow initial signs. Death may occur 18 to 36 hours postingestion.
    C) Hematuria and hemoglobinuria usually appear first, when blood methemoglobin levels are around 20% (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986). In one late (48 hr) presentation case, a dog presented with severe Heinz-body hemolytic anemia, bleeding tendencies and a RBC glutathione concentration that was 10% of reference values (Wallace et al, 2002).
    11.1.6) FELINE/CAT
    A) Cats are very susceptible to acetaminophen toxicity. Signs may occur within a few hours of ingestion and include depression, anorexia, vomiting, cyanosis, edema of the face and extremities, methemoglobinemia, dyspnea, and death (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    B) Hematuria and hemoglobinuria usually appear first, when blood methemoglobin levels are around 20% (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).

Treatment

    11.2.1) SUMMARY
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    5) Due to lack of reports of large animal intoxication with this substance, the following sections address small animals (dogs and cats) only. In the case of a poisoning involving large animals, consult a veterinary poison control center.
    11.2.2) LIFE SUPPORT
    A) GENERAL
    1) MAINTAIN VITAL FUNCTIONS: Secure airway, supply oxygen, and begin supportive fluid therapy if necessary.
    11.2.4) DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) CAT
    a) EMESIS AND LAVAGE -
    1) If within 2 hours of exposure, induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os.
    a) Do not use an emetic if the animal is hypoxic. In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    b) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times (Kirk, 1986).
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) Due to controversy over adsorption of N-acetylcysteine, do not give activated charcoal and NAC within 2 hours of each other. Activated charcoal dose is 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube.
    c) CATHARTIC -
    1) If the animal is not experiencing life-threatening symptoms, administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram).
    a) If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    2) DOG
    a) EMESIS AND LAVAGE -
    1) If within 2 hours of exposure, induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os or one tablet (6 milligrams) apomorphine diluted in 3 to 5 milliliters water and instilled into the conjunctival sac or per os.
    a) Do not use an emetic if the animal is hypoxic. In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    b) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times (Kirk, 1986).
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) Due to controversy over adsorption of N-acetylcysteine, do not give activated charcoal and NAC within 2 hours of each other. Activated charcoal dose is 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube.
    c) CATHARTIC -
    1) If the animal is not experiencing life-threatening symptoms, administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram).
    a) If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    11.2.5) TREATMENT
    A) NOTE -
    1) Oral formulations of N-acetylcysteine are used intravenously in the clinical treatment of animals, although not tested or approved for this use.
    B) CAT
    1) Treatment of acetaminophen poisoning (use this protocol if within 24 hours of exposure) (Plumb, 1989; Beasley et al, 1989):
    a) Maintain vital functions: Secure airway, supply oxygen if cyanotic, and begin supportive fluid therapy.
    b) Decontaminate as specified above.
    c) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE - For severely poisoned animals, load with 140 to 280 milligrams/kilogram per os or intravenously. Dilute in D5W to 5% solution and give either via stomach tube or intravenously slowly over a period of 15 to 20 minutes.
    1) Thereafter, give 70 milligrams/kilogram per os every 4 hours for up to 17 doses; if clinical picture is good can instead dose with 70 milligrams/kilogram per os four times daily for three days.
    2) Given the extended half-life of acetaminophen in cats, NAC should be given to cats with clinical signs REGARDLESS OF TIME SINCE INGESTION (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986). Sodium sulfate or methylene blue can be given instead of NAC.
    3) An alternate dosing regimen has had beneficial outcomes, consisting of 4 oral doses (200 milligrams/kilogram, given 3 times, and 100 milligrams/kilogram, given once) with 2 hours between doses (Gaunt et al, 1981).
    d) SODIUM SULFATE - Sodium sulfate has been used as an alternative to NAC. Dose: 50 milligrams/kilogram of a 1.6% solution in water given intravenously every 4 hours for a total of 3 to 6 treatments.
    1) This treatment was found to be as effective as oral or intravenous NAC at reducing methemoglobinemia (Savides et al, 1985).
    e) METHYLENE BLUE - Prepare a solution of 10 percent methylene blue in sterile saline (100 milligrams methylene blue per milliliter saline). Administer the solution intravenously to provide a dose of 1.5 milligrams/kilogram methylene blue (Rumbeiha & Oehme, 1992).
    1) For an average 4.5 kg (10 pounds) cat, the dosage volume of 10 percent solution would be 0.07 milliliter. This agent effectively reverses methemoglobinemia.
    2) The dosage may be repeated two or three times without causing anemia (Personal Communication, 1991).
    3) Blood smears and complete blood counts should be monitored for one week after treatment.
    f) ASCORBIC ACID - Ascorbic acid converts methemoglobin to oxyhemoglobin. Dose at 30 milligrams/kilogram subcutaneously every 6 hours for 7 treatments. This is an adjunct therapy.
    g) CORTICOSTEROIDS and ANTIHISTAMINES ARE CONTRAINDICATED. Limit physical activity to reduce anoxia hazard. Drinking water should always be available, and food may be offered 24 hours after beginning treatment.
    2) If the patient is presented 24 hours or more post-ingestion, treat for massive methemoglobinemia, including ascorbic acid, methylene blue, supportive care, and whole-blood transfusions. Limit physical activity.
    C) DOG
    1) Treatment of acetaminophen poisoning (use this protocol if within 24 hours of exposure) (Plumb, 1989; Beasley et al, 1989):
    a) Maintain vital functions: Secure airway, supply oxygen if cyanotic, and begin supportive fluid therapy.
    b) Decontaminate as specified above.
    c) N-ACETYLCYSTEINE - For severely poisoned animals, load with 280 milligrams/kilogram per os or intravenously. (Use cat dosages for dogs weighing 10 kilograms and less).
    1) Dilute in D5W to 5% solution and give either via stomach tube or intravenously slowly over a period of 15 to 20 minutes.
    2) Thereafter, give 140 milligrams/kilogram per os every 4 hours for up to 17 doses; if clinical picture is good can instead dose with 140 milligrams/kilogram per os four times daily for three days.
    d) ASCORBIC ACID - Ascorbic acid converts methemoglobin to oxyhemoglobin. If methemoglobinemia is present, dose at 30 milligrams/kilogram subcutaneously every 6 hours for 7 treatments.
    e) CORTICOSTEROIDS and ANTIHISTAMINES ARE CONTRAINDICATED. Limit physical activity to reduce anoxia hazard. Drinking water should always be available, and food may be offered 24 hours after beginning treatment.
    2) If patient is presented 24 hours or more after ingestion, treat for hepatic insufficiency including supportive care, maintaining electrolyte balance, cleansing enemas, dietary restrictions, and systemic antibiotics. Limit physical activity.

Range Of Toxicity

    11.3.1) THERAPEUTIC DOSE
    A) CAT
    1) PRODUCTS CONTAINING ACETAMINOPHEN or PHENACETIN SHOULD NEVER BE ADMINISTERED TO CATS. No dose is safe. Cats do not have the ability to metabolize acetaminophen.
    B) DOG
    1) Buffered aspirin or aspirin combined with gastric protectants is the preferred over the counter analgesic/anti-inflammatory for dogs.
    a) If acetaminophen is used, the dosage must be under 100 milligrams per kilogram. For a 27 kilogram (60 pounds) dog, one 325 milligram tablet given twice daily is acceptable. If this dose does not alleviate symptoms, a veterinarian should be consulted. Another reference cites a normal oral dose for a dog as 15 milligrams/kilogram, given 3 times daily (Wallace et al, 2002).
    11.3.2) MINIMAL TOXIC DOSE
    A) CAT
    1) Cats are poisoned by as little as 50 to 60 milligrams/kilogram orally. This means that in cats one "extra-strength" tablet will initiate toxic effects; two "extra-strength" tablets given within 24 hours to an average size cat can produce death.
    2) An oral dose of 60 milligrams/kilogram in cats has been found to produce 21.7% methemoglobinemia within 4 hours of ingestion (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    B) DOG
    1) Toxic dose for dogs is probably greater than or equal to 150 milligrams/kilogram (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    2) Dogs administered 3 doses of acetaminophen (750 milligrams/kilogram initially, 200 milligrams/kilogram 9 hours later, and 200 milligrams/kilogram at 24 hours after the initial dose) in dimethyl sulfoxide given by subcutaneous injection consistently developed fulminant hepatic failure.
    a) No deaths occur within the first 36 hours (Francavilla et al, 1989).
    3) An oral dosage of 200 milligrams/kilogram produces 18.8 percent methemoglobin; 500 milligrams/kilogram produces 51.9 percent (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    C) SWINE
    1) A toxic dose of acetaminophen for pigs is around 1000 milligrams/kilogram. In one study, 7 pigs given 500 to 1000 milligrams/kilogram survived, but all 5 pigs given 1000 to 2000 milligrams/kilogram acetaminophen died within 6.5 hours of administration (Henne-Bruns et al, 1988).
    D) DOG
    1) In one case, an 8-month-old Shetland sheepdog ingested 1 gram/kilogram and presented to the emergency animal hospital 48 hours later unresponsive with fever, dehydration, tachypnea, pale brown mucous membranes and blood-stained stools. CBC revealed severe Heinz-body hemolytic anemia, bleeding tendencies and a RBC glutathione concentration which was 10% of reference values. The dog survived with supportive care and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) treatment (Wallace et al, 2002).

Continuing Care

    11.4.1) SUMMARY
    11.4.1.2) DECONTAMINATION/TREATMENT
    A) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Begin treatment immediately.
    2) Keep animal warm and do not handle unnecessarily.
    3) Sample vomitus, blood, urine, and feces for analysis.
    4) ANIMAL POISON CONTROL CENTERS
    a) ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center, An Allied Agency of the University of Illinois, 1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, website www.aspca.org/apcc
    b) It is an emergency telephone service which provides toxicology information to veterinarians, animal owners, universities, extension personnel and poison center staff for a fee. A veterinary toxicologist is available for consultation.
    c) The following 24-hour phone number is available: (888) 426-4435. A fee may apply. Please inquire with the poison center. The agency will make follow-up calls as needed in critical cases at no extra charge.
    5) Due to lack of reports of large animal intoxication with this substance, the following sections address small animals (dogs and cats) only. In the case of a poisoning involving large animals, consult a veterinary poison control center.
    11.4.2) DECONTAMINATION
    11.4.2.2) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    A) GASTRIC DECONTAMINATION
    1) CAT
    a) EMESIS AND LAVAGE -
    1) If within 2 hours of exposure, induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os.
    a) Do not use an emetic if the animal is hypoxic. In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    b) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times (Kirk, 1986).
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) Due to controversy over adsorption of N-acetylcysteine, do not give activated charcoal and NAC within 2 hours of each other. Activated charcoal dose is 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube.
    c) CATHARTIC -
    1) If the animal is not experiencing life-threatening symptoms, administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram).
    a) If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    2) DOG
    a) EMESIS AND LAVAGE -
    1) If within 2 hours of exposure, induce emesis with 1 to 2 milliliters/kilogram syrup of ipecac per os or one tablet (6 milligrams) apomorphine diluted in 3 to 5 milliliters water and instilled into the conjunctival sac or per os.
    a) Do not use an emetic if the animal is hypoxic. In the absence of a gag reflex or if vomiting cannot be induced, place a cuffed endotracheal tube and begin gastric lavage.
    b) Pass large bore stomach tube and instill 5 to 10 milliliters/kilogram water or lavage solution, then aspirate. Repeat 10 times (Kirk, 1986).
    b) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL -
    1) Due to controversy over adsorption of N-acetylcysteine, do not give activated charcoal and NAC within 2 hours of each other. Activated charcoal dose is 2 grams/kilogram per os or via stomach tube.
    c) CATHARTIC -
    1) If the animal is not experiencing life-threatening symptoms, administer a dose of a saline cathartic such as magnesium or sodium sulfate (sodium sulfate dose is 1 gram/kilogram).
    a) If access to these agents is limited, give 5 to 15 milliliters magnesium oxide (Milk of Magnesia) per os for dilution.
    11.4.3) TREATMENT
    11.4.3.4) PHARMACOLOGIC INTERVENTION
    A) DOG
    1) In one case of late presentation (48 hours) following an overdose of 1 gram/kilogram in an 8-month old Shetland sheepdog, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) was administered following laboratory tests which revealed severe Heinz-body hemolytic anemia, bleeding tendencies, and a RBC glutathione concentration which was 10% of reference values. A loading dose of SAMe of 40 milligrams/kilogram was administered orally, followed by a maintenance dose of 20 milligrams/kilogram orally 6 times daily for 9 days. Other supportive measures were concurrently administered. The dog recovered (Wallace et al, 2002).
    11.4.3.5) SUPPORTIVE CARE
    A) GENERAL
    1) Ongoing treatment is symptomatic and supportive.

Kinetics

    11.5.1) ABSORPTION
    A) LACK OF INFORMATION
    1) There was no specific information on absorption at the time of this review.
    11.5.3) METABOLISM
    A) CAT
    1) The major metabolite at a dosage of 20 milligrams/kilogram is acetaminophen sulfate (90%); other metabolites include the cysteine (5%) and glucuronide (1%) conjugates (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    B) DOG
    1) Metabolites (regardless of dose): glucuronide (75%); sulfate (10% to 20%); cysteine (3% to 5%) (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986)
    11.5.4) ELIMINATION
    A) CAT
    1) Elimination is capacity-limited. After oral administration of 20 mg/kg, half-life was 0.6 hour; after 60 mg/kg, half-life was 2.4 hours (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).
    B) DOG
    1) Half-life after a dose of 200 mg/kg was 1.2 hours. After a dose of 500 mg/kg, half-life was 3.5 hours (Hjelle & Grauer, 1986).

Other

    A) OTHER
    1) CAT
    a) WET CAT FOODS, which may contain 7 to 13% propylene glycol, may be responsible for an increased sensitivity of the red blood cells to oxidative stress, such as that caused by acetaminophen administration.
    b) In one study, methemoglobin concentrations in cats fed diets high in propylene glycol, and then dosed with acetaminophen, were significantly higher than cats fed diets low in PG and then given acetaminophen (Weiss et al, 1990).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    5) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    6) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    9) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    10) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    11) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    12) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    13) Agarwal R & Farber MO: Is continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for acetaminophen-induced acute liver and renal failure worthwhile?. Clin Nephrol 2002; 57:167-170.
    14) Akca S, Suleymanlar I, & Tuncer M: Isolated acute renal failure due to paracetamol intoxication in an alcoholic patient (letter). Nephron 1999; 83:270-271.
    15) Al-Jubouri MA: Metabolic acidosis and coma after acetaminophen ingestion (letter). Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34:685.
    16) Alander SW, Dowd D, & Bratton SL: Pediatric acetaminophen overdose. Risk factors associated with hepatocellular injury. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154:346-350.
    17) Alaspaa AO, Kuisma MJ, Hoppu K, et al: Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:207-12.
    18) Alkhuja S, Aboudan M, & Menkel R: Acetaminophen toxicity induced by non-oliguric acute tubular necrosis (letter). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:190.
    19) Alsalim W & Fadel M: Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Oral methionine compared with intravenous n-acetyl cysteine for paracetamol overdose. Emerg Med J 2003; 20(4):366-367.
    20) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    21) Anderson BJ, Holford NHG, & Armishaw JC: Predicting concentrations in children presenting with acetaminophen overdose. J Pediatr 1999; 135:290-295.
    22) Andreasen PB & Hutters L: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) clearance in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Acta Med Scand 1979; 624(Suppl):99-105.
    23) Andrews DJ, Scott PH, & Lewin DJ: Interference by levodopa and related compounds with paracetamol estimation. Lancet 1982; 1:1193.
    24) Anon: Acetaminophen and HIV don't mix. Patient Care; 222, 1997.
    25) Anon: Committee on Drugs & American Academy of Pediatrics: The transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 1994; 93:137-150.
    26) Anon: Death after N-acetylcysteine. Lancet 1984; 1:1421.
    27) Armour A & Slater SD: Paracetamol cardiotoxicity. Postgrad Med J 1993; 69:52-54.
    28) Ash SR, Caldwell CA, & Singer GG: Treatment of acetaminophen-induced hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure with extracorporeal sorbent-based devices. Adv Renal Replace Ther 2002; 9:42-53.
    29) Autret-Leca E, Gibb IA, & Goulder MA: Ibuprofen versus paracetamol in pediatric fever: objective and subjective findings from a randomized, blinded study. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23(9):2205-2211.
    30) Aw MM, Dhawan A, & Baker AJ: Neonatal paracetamol poisoning (letter). Arch Dis Child 1999; 81:F78.
    31) Bailey B & McGuigan MA: Management of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31:710-715.
    32) Bailey B, Amre DK, & Gaudreault P: Fulminant hepatic failure secondary to acetaminophen poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic criteria determining the need for liver transplantation. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:299-305.
    33) Bainbridge CA, Kelly EL, & Walking WD: In vitro adsorption of acetaminophen onto activated charcoal. J Pharm Sci 1977; 66:480-483.
    34) Bania TC, Roberts DW, & Hoffman RS: Acetaminophen protein adducts in severe acetaminophen poisoning (abs 132). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:349.
    35) Bartolone JB, Cohen SD, & Khairallah EA: Immunohistochemical localization of acetaminophen-bound liver proteins. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1989a; 13:859-862.
    36) Bartolone JB, Sparks K, & Cohen SD: Immunochemical detection of acetaminophen-bound liver proteins. Biochem Pharmacol 1987; 36:1193-1196.
    37) Bateman DN, Woodhouse KW, & Rawlins MD: Adverse reactions to N-acetylcysteine. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3:393-398.
    38) Baudouin SV, Howdle P, & O'Grady JG: Acute lung injury in fulminant hepatic failure following paracetamol poisoning. Thorax 1995; 50:399-402.
    39) Bauman BH & McManus JG Jr: Pediatric pain management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2005; 23(2):393-414, ix.
    40) Beasley VR, Dorman DC, & Fikes JD: A Systems Affected Approach to Veterinary Toxicology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1989.
    41) Bebarta VS, Shiner DC, & Varney SM: A case of moderate liver enzyme elevation after acute acetaminophen overdose despite undetectable acetaminophen level and normal initial liver enzymes. Am J Ther 2014; 21(3):e82-e84.
    42) Beckett GJ, Foster GR, & Hussey AJ: Plasma glutatione-S-transferase and F protein are more sensitive than alanine aminotransferase as markers of paracetamol (acetaminophen)-induced liver damage. Clin Chem 1989; 35:2186-2189.
    43) Bedda S, Laurent A, Conti F, et al: Mangafodipir prevents liver injury induced by acetaminophen in the mouse. J Hepatol 2003; 39(5):765-772.
    44) Behrman RE & Vaughn VC III: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 12th ed, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1983.
    45) Ben-Zvi B, Weissman-Teitellman B, & Katz S: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: is there a role for prostaglandin synthesis?. Arch Toxicol 1990; 64:299-304.
    46) Benson GD: Hepatotoxicity following the therapeutic use of antipyretic analgesics. Am J Med 1983b; 75:85-92.
    47) Benson RE & Boleyn T: Paracetamol overdose: a plan of management. Anaesth Intens Care 1974; 2:334-339.
    48) Berde CB & Sethna NF: Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(14):1094-1103.
    49) Berg KJ, Djoseland O, & Gjellan A: Acute effects of paracetamol on prostaglandin synthesis and renal function in normal man and in patients with renal failure. Clin Nephrol 1990; 34:255-262.
    50) Beringer RM, Thompson JP, Parry S, et al: Intravenous paracetamol overdose: two case reports and a change to national treatment guidelines. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96(3):307-308.
    51) Berlin BM, Yaffe SJ, & Ragni M: Disposition of acetaminophen in milk, saliva, and plasma of lactating women. Ped Pharmacol 1980a; 1:135-141.
    52) Berlin CM Jr, Yaffe SJ, & Ragni M: Disposition of acetaminophen in milk, saliva, and plasma of lactating women. Pediatr Pharmacol 1980; 1:135-141.
    53) Berling I, Anscombe M, & Isbister GK: Intravenous paracetamol toxicity in a malnourished child. Clin Toxicol 2012; 50(1):74-76.
    54) Bernal W, Donaldson N, & Wyncoll D: Blood lactate as an early predictor of outcome in paracetamol-induced acute liver failure: a cohort study. Lancet 2002; 359:558-563.
    55) Betten DP, Cantrell FL, Thomas SC, et al: A prospective evaluation of shortened course oral N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50(3):272-279.
    56) Beuhler M, Katz K, & Curry S: False-positive acetaminophen levels with hyperbilirubinemia (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:659.
    57) Bitzen PO, Gustafsson B, Jostell KG, et al: Excretion of paracetamol in human breast milk. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 20:123-125.
    58) Bizovi KE, Aks SE, & Paloucek F: Late increase in acetaminophen concentration after overdose of tylenol extended relief. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28:549-551.
    59) Blair D & Rumack BH: Acetaminophen in serum and plasma estimated by high-pressure liquid chromatography: a microscale method. Clin Chem 1977; 23:743-745.
    60) Bond GR & Hite LK: Population-based incidence and outcome of acetaminophen poisoning by type of ingestion. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6:1115-1120.
    61) Bond GR, Krenzelok EP, & Normann SA: Acetaminophen ingestion in childhood - cost and relative risk of alternative referral strategies. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:513-525.
    62) Bonfiglio MF, Traeger SM, & Hulisz DT: Anaphylactoid reaction to intravenous acetylcysteine associated with electrocardiographic abnormalities. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26:22-24.
    63) Bonkovsky HL, Kane RE, & Jones DP: Acute hepatic and renal toxicity from low doses of acetaminophen in the absence of alcohol abuse or malnutrition: evidence for increased susceptibility to drug toxicity due to cardiopulmonary and renal insufficiency. Hepatology 1994; 19:1141-1148.
    64) Boutis K & Shannon M: Nephrotoxicity after acute severe acetaminophen poisoning in adolescents. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:441-445.
    65) Bradberry SM, Hart M, & Bareford D: Factor V and factor VII:V ratio as prognostic indicators in paracetamol poisoning (letter). Lancet 1995; 346:646-647.
    66) Bray GP, Harrison PM, & O'Grady JG: Long-term anticonvulsant therapy worsens outcome in paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Human & Exp Tox 1992; 11:265-70.
    67) Bray GP, Mowat C, & Muir DF: The effect of chronic alcohol intake on prognosis and outcome in paracetamol overdose. Hum Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:435-438.
    68) Bridges RR, Kinniburgh DW, & Kiehn BJ: An evaluation of common methods for acetaminophen quantitation for small hospitals. Clin Tox 1983; 20:1-17.
    69) Brotodihardjo AE, Batey RG, & Farrell GC: Hepatotoxicity from paracetamol self-poisoning in western Sydney: a continuing challange. Med J Aust 1992; 157:382-385.
    70) Buckley N & Eddleston M: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Clin Evid 2004; 2004(11):1826-1832.
    71) Buckley NA & Srinivasan J: Should a lower treatment line be used when treating paracetamol poisoning in patients with chronic alcoholism? A case for. Drug Safety 2002; 25:619-624.
    72) Buckley NA, Whyte IM, & O'Connell DL: Oral or intravenous N-acetylcysteine: which is the treatment of choice for acetaminophen (paracetamol) poisoning?. Clin Toxicol 1999a; 37:759-767.
    73) Burmester M, Dargan PI, & Mok Q: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as a result of inadvertent intravenous acetaminophen suspension (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:484-485.
    74) Buttery JE, Boord S, & Ludvigsen N: Ascorbate interference in the urinary screen for acetaminophen. Clin Chem 1988; 34:769.
    75) Buttery PJ: Hormonal control of protein deposition in animals. Proc Nutr Soc 1983; 42:137-148.
    76) Byer AJ, Traylor TR, & Semmer JR: Acetaminophen overdose in the third trimester of pregnancy. JAMA 1982; 247:3114-3115.
    77) Byer AJ, Traylor TR, & Semmer: Acetaminophen overdose in the third trimester of pregnancy. JAMA 1982a; 247:3114-3115.
    78) Caldarola VA, Hassett JM, & Hall AH: Hemorrhagic pancreatitis associated with acetaminophen overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1985; 27:319.
    79) Caldarola VA, Hassett JM, & Hall AH: Hemorrhagic pancreatitis associated with acetaminophen overdose. Am J Gastroenterology 1986; 81:579-82.
    80) Campbell NRC & Baylis B: Renal impairment associated with an acute paracetamol overdose in the absence of hepatotoxicity. Postgrad Med J 1992; 68:116-118.
    81) Caraccio TR, Mofenson HC, & Lawless MJ: Delayed peak acetaminophen (APAP) levels (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:563.
    82) Cetaruk E, Horowitz R, & Hurlbut K: Tylenol (R) extended relief overdose: a new headache? (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:511.
    83) Cetaruk EW, Dart RC, & Horowitz RS: Extended-release acetaminophen overdose (letter). JAMA 1996; 275:686.
    84) Cetaruk EW, Dart RC, & Hurlbut KM: Tylenol extended relief overdose. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30:104-108.
    85) Chafetz L, Daly RE, & Schriftman H: Selective colorimetric determination of acetaminophen. J Pharm Sci 1971; 60:463-466.
    86) Chan TYK & Critchley JAJH: Adverse reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine in Chinese patients with paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 1994; 13:542-544.
    87) Chan TYK, Critchley JAJH, & Chan AYW: Renal failure is uncommon in chinese patients with paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Vet Human Toxicol 1995; 37:154-156.
    88) Charley G, Dean BS, & Krenzelok EP: Oral N-acetylcysteine-induced urticaria - a case report (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1987; 29:477.
    89) Cheung L, Potts RG, & Meyer KM: Acetaminophen treatment nomogram (letter). NEJM 1994; 330:1907-1908.
    90) Chien JY, Peter RM, Nolan CM, et al: Influence of polymorphic N-acetyltransferase phenotype on the inhibition and induction of acetaminophen bioactivation with long-term isoniazid. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 61(1):24-34.
    91) Christophersen AB, Hoegberg LCG, & Angelo HR: Activated charcoal in a simulated paracetamol overdose: downscaling of dose to 10 grams - preliminary results (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2002a; 40:696.
    92) Christophersen AB, Levin D, & Hoegberg LCG: Activated charcoal alone or after gastric lavage: a simulated large paracetamol intoxication. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 53:312-317.
    93) Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, et al: Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(2):61-87.
    94) Clark D, Ruck B, & Jennis T: Compliance with PCC recommendations: discontinuation of NAC (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:485.
    95) Clark RF: Acetaminophen: Which nomogram? (letter). AACT Clin Toxicol 1998; 11:1-2.
    96) Cleves MA, Savell VH, Raj S, et al: Maternal use of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and muscular ventricular septal defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004; 70 :107-113.
    97) Corcoran GB, Mitchell JR, & Vaishnav YN: Evidence that acetaminophen and N-hydroxyacetaminophen form a common arylating intermaediat, N-acetyl-benzoqinoneimine. Mol Pharmacol 1980; 18:536-42.
    98) Corcoran GB, Wong BK, & Neese BL: Early sustained rise in total liver calcium during acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in mice. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1987; 58:291-305.
    99) Courreges P: Inadvertent epidural infusion of paracetamol in a child. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15(12):1128-1130.
    100) Coward RA: Paracetamol-induced acute pancreatitis. Br Med J 1977; 1:1086.
    101) Cramer DW, Harlow BL, & Titus-Ernstoff L: Over-the-counter analgesics and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1998; 351:104-107.
    102) Cranswick N & Coghlan D: Paracetamol efficacy and safety in children: the first 40 years. Am J Ther 2000; 7(2):135-141.
    103) Crippin JS: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: potentiation by isoniazid. Am J Gastroenterology 1993; 88:590-592.
    104) Critchley JA, Scott AW, & Dyson EH: Is there a place for cimetidine or ethanol in the treatment of paracetamol poisoning?. Lancet 1983; 18:1375-1376.
    105) Curry WR, Robinson D, & Sughrue MF: Acute renal failure after acetaminophen ingestion. JAMA 1982; 247:1012-1014.
    106) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    107) Dabos KJ, Newsome PN, Parkinson JA, et al: A biochemical prognostic model of outcome in paracetamol-induced acute liver injury. Transplantation 2005; 80(12):1712-1717.
    108) Dagnone D, Matsui D, & Rieder MJ: Assessment of the palatability of vehicles for activated charcoal in pediatric volunteers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002; 18:19-21.
    109) Dalhoff K, Hansen PB, & Ott P: Acute ethanol administration reduces the antidote effect of n-acetylcysteine after acetaminophen overdose in mice. Hum Exp Toxicol 1991; 10:431-433.
    110) Daly FF, Fountain JS, Murray L, et al: Guidelines for the management of paracetamol poisoning in Australia and New Zealand--explanation and elaboration. A consensus statement from clinical toxicologists consulting to the Australasian poisons information centres. Med J Aust 2008; 188(5):296-301.
    111) Dargan PI & Jones AL: Should a lower treatment line be used when treating paracetamol poisoning in patients with chronic alcoholism? A case against. Drug Safety 2002; 25:625-632.
    112) Dart RC & Rumack BH: Intravenous acetaminophen in the United States: iatrogenic dosing errors. Pediatrics 2012; 129(2):349-353.
    113) Dart RC, Erdman AR, Olson KR, et al: Acetaminophen poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(1):1-18.
    114) Dart RC, Green JL, Kuffner EK, et al: The effects of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on hepatic tests in patients who chronically abuse alcohol - a randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32(3):478-486.
    115) Davenport A & Finn R: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning resulting in acute renal failure without hepatic coma. Nephron 1988; 50:55-56.
    116) Davenport A, Will EJ, & Davison AM: Continuous vs. intermittent forms of haemofiltration and/or dialysis in the management of acute renal failure in patients with defective cerebral autoregulation at risk of cerebral oedema. Contrib Nephrol 1991; 93:225-233.
    117) Davern TJ, James LP, Hinson JA, et al: Measurement of serum acetaminophen-protein adducts in patients with acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 2006; 130(3):687-694.
    118) Davidson DG & Eastham WN: Acute liver necrosis following overdose of paracetamol. Br Med J 1966; 5512:497-499.
    119) Davis M, Simmons CJ, & Harrison NG: Paracetamol overdose in man: relationship between pattern of urinary metabolites and severity of liver damage. Q J Med 1976; 45:181-191.
    120) Dawson AH, Henry DA, & McEwen J: Adverse reactions to N-acetylcysteine during treatment for paracetamol poisoning. Med J Aust 1989; 150:329-331.
    121) Dean BS & Krenzelok EP: NAC "to go": a new creative trend or tragedy? (abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1994; 36:350.
    122) Dean BS, Bricker JD, & Krenzelok EP: Outpatient N-acetylcysteine treatment for acetaminophen poisoning: an ethical dilemma or a new financial mandate?. Vet Hum Toxicol 1996; 38:222-224.
    123) Devlin J, Wendon J, & Heaton N: Pretransplantation clinical status and outcome of emergency transplantation for acute liver failure. Hepatology 1995; 21:1018-1024.
    124) Diem VL & Grilliat JP: Anaphylactic shock induced by paracetamol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 38:389-390.
    125) Donovan JW, Jarvie D, & Prescott LF: Hypersensitivity reactions to N-acetylcysteine: a concentration dependent phenomenon (abstract), EAPCC Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1988.
    126) Donovan JW, Mancuso E, & Burkhart KK: Intravenous N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose: an abbreviated protocol (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:642.
    127) Donovan JW: Early predictors of acetaminophen toxicity (Abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1987a; 29:471.
    128) Douglas DR, Sholar JB, & Smilkstein MJ: A pharmacokinetic comparison of acetaminophen products (Tylenol extended relief vs regular Tylenol). Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3:740-744.
    129) Douglas DR, Smilkstein MJ, & Rumack BH: APAP levels within 4 hours: are they useful? (abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1994; 36:350.
    130) Douidar SM & Ahmed AE: A novel mechanism for the enhancement of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by phenobarbital. J Pharmacol Exper Ther 1987; 240:578-583.
    131) Douidar SM, Al-Khalil I, & Habersang RW: Severe hepatotoxicity, acute renal failure, and pancytopenia in a young child after repeated acetaminophen overdosing. Clin Pediatr 1994; 33:42-45.
    132) Duffy JP & Byers J: Acetaminophen assay: the clinical consequences of a colorimetric vs a high pressure liquid chromatography determination in the assessment of two potentially poisoned patients. Clin Toxicol 1979; 15:427-435.
    133) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    134) Eckardt KU, William C, & Frei U: Severe hypophosphataemia in paracetamol-induced oliguric renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14(8):2013-2014.
    135) Edinboro LE, Jackson GF, & Jortani SA: Determination of serum acetaminophen in emergency toxicology: evaluation of newer methods: Abbott TDx and second derivative ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Clin Toxicol 1991; 29:241-255.
    136) Edwards DA, Fish SF, & Lamson MJ: Prediction of acetaminophen level from clinical history of overdose using a pharmacokinetic model. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:1314-1319.
    137) Eguia L & Materson BJ: Acetaminophen-related acute renal failure without fulminant liver failure. Pharmacotherapy 1997; 17:363-370.
    138) Elliot CG, Colby TV, & Kelly TM: Charcoal lung. Bronchiolitis obliterans after aspiration of activated charcoal. Chest 1989; 96:672-674.
    139) Ellis M, Haydik I, & Gillman S: Immediate adverse reactions to acetaminophen in children: evaluation of histamine release and spirometry. J Pediatr 1989; 114:654-656.
    140) Emeigh Hart SG, Beierschmitt WP, & Bartolone JB: Evidence against deacetylation and for cytochrome P450-mediated activation in acetaminophen-induced nephrotoxicity in the CD-1 mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1991; 107:1-15.
    141) Esteban A & Perez-Mateo M: Gilbert's disease: a risk factor for paracetamol overdose? (letter). J Hepatology 1993; 18:257-258.
    142) Esterline RL & Ji S: Metabolic alterations resulting from the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by acetaminophen in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol 1989; 38:2390-2392.
    143) FDA: Over-the-counter drug products containing analgesic/antipyretic active ingredients for internal use; required alcohol warning. FDA: Federal Register 1998; 63:56789-56802.
    144) FDA: Poison treatment drug product for over-the-counter human use; tentative final monograph. FDA: Fed Register 1985; 50:2244-2262.
    145) Farah D: Paracetamol interference with blood glucose analysis: a potentially fatal phenomenon. Br Med J 1982; 285:172.
    146) Farid NR, Glynn JP, & Kerr DNS: Haemodialysis in paracetamol self-poisoning. Lancet 1972; 2:396-398.
    147) Farrell J & Schmitz PG: Paracetamol-induced pancreatitis and fulminant hepatitis in a hemodialysis patient. Clin Nephrol 1997; 48:132-133.
    148) Fischereder M & Jaffe JP: Thrombocytopenia following acute acetaminophen overdose. Am J Hematol 1994; 45:258-259.
    149) Flanagan RJ & Mant TGK: Coma and metabolic acidosis early in severe acute paracetamol poisoning. Hum Toxicol 1986; 5:179-182.
    150) Forrest JAH, Adriaenssens P, & Finlayson DC: Paracetamol metabolism in chronic liver disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 15:427-431.
    151) Francavilla A, Makowka L, & Polimeno L: A dog model for acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Gastroenterology 1989; 96:470-478.
    152) Friedman S, Gatti M, & Baker T: Cesarean section after maternal acetaminophen overdose. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:632-634.
    153) Fyfe AI & Wright JM: Chronic acetaminophen ingestion associated with (1;7) (p11;p11) translocation and immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Med 1990; 88:443-444.
    154) Gaunt SD, Baker DC, & Green RA: Clinicopathologic evaluation of N-acetylcysteine therapy in acetaminophen toxicosis in the cat. Am J Vet Res 1981; 42:1982-1984.
    155) Gazzard BG, Willson RA, & Weston MJ: Charcoal haemoperfusion for paracetamol overdose. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1974; 1:271-275.
    156) Gesell LB & Stephan M: Delayed acetaminophen peak and toxicity in combination products (abstract) . J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:568.
    157) Gill EJ, Contos MJ, & Peng TCC: Acute fatty liver of pregnancy and acetaminophen toxicity leading to liver failure and postpartum liver transplantation. J Reprod Med 2002; 47:584-586.
    158) Gilmore IT & Touvras E: Paracetamol induced acute pancreatitis. Br Med J 1977; 2:753.
    159) Gimson AES, Braud S, & Mellon PJ: Early charcoal hemoperfusion in hepatic failure. Lancet 1982; 2:681-683.
    160) Gok MA, Gupta A, Olschewski P, et al: Renal transplants from non-heart beating paracetamol overdose donors. Clin Transplant 2004; 18(5):541-546.
    161) Goldman RD, Ko K, Linett LJ, et al: Antipyretic efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in children. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38(1):146-150.
    162) Golej J, Boigner H, Burda G, et al: Severe respiratory failure following charcoal application in a toddler. Resuscitation 2001; 49:315-318.
    163) Gow PJ, Angus PW, & Smallwood RA: Transplantation in patients with paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure (letter). Lancet 1997; 349:651-652.
    164) Gow PJ, Warrilow S, Lontos S, et al: Time to review the selection criteria for transplantation in paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure?. Liver Transpl 2007; 13(12):1762-1763.
    165) Graff GR, Stark J, & Berkenbosch JW: Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics 2002; 109:959-961.
    166) Graudins A, Aaron CK, & Linden CH: Overdose of extended-release acetaminophen (letter). N Engl J Med 1995; 196.
    167) Gray TA, Buckley BM, & Vale JA: Hyperlactataemia and metabolic acidosis following paracetamol overdose. Q J Med 1987a; 65:811-821.
    168) Gray TA, Buckley BM, & Vale JA: Hyperlactataemia and metabolic acidosis following paracetamol overdose. Quarterly J Med 1987; 246:811-821.
    169) Greco C & Berde C: Pain management for the hospitalized pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin North Am 2005; 52(4):995-1027.
    170) Gregus Z, Madhu C, & Klaassen CD: Species variation in toxication and detoxication of acetaminophen in vivo: a comparative study of biliary and urinary excretion of acetaminophen metabolites. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988; 244:91-99.
    171) Guenther Skokan E, Junkins EP, & Corneli HM: Taste test: children rate flavoring agents used with activated charcoal. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:683-686.
    172) Gursoy M, Haznedaroglu IC, & Celik I: Agranulocytosis, plasmacytosis, and thrombocytosis followed by a leukemoid reaction due to acute acetaminophen toxicity. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30:762-765.
    173) Halevi A, Ben-Aritai D, & Garty BZ: Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with acetaminophen ingestion. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34:32-34.
    174) Hall AH & Rumack BH: The treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning. J Intens Care Med 1986; 1:29-32.
    175) Hantson P, Vekemans MC, & Laterre PF: Heart donation after fatal acetaminophen poisoning (letter). Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:325-326.
    176) Harris CR & Filandrinos D: Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: aspiration by proxy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:1470-1473.
    177) Harrison PM, Keays R, & Bray GP: Improved outcome of paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure by late administration of acetylcysteine. Lancet 1990; 335:1572-1573.
    178) Harrison PM, O'Grady JG, & Keays RT: Serial prothrombin time as a prognostic indicator in paractamol induced fulminant hepatic failure. BMJ 1990a; 301:964-966.
    179) Hartleb M: Do thyroid hormones promote hepatotoxicity to acetaminophen? (letter). AJG 1994; 89:1269-1270.
    180) Harvison PJ, Egan RW, & Gale PH: Acetaminophen and analogs as cosubstrates and inhibitors of prostaglandin H synthesis. Chem Biol Interact 1988; 64:251-266.
    181) Hazai E, Simon-Trompler E, & Czira G: New LC method using radioactivity detection for analysis of toxic metabolite of acetaminophen (paracetamol). Chromatogr 2002; 56:S75-S78.
    182) Heard KJ: Acetylcysteine for acetaminophen poisoning. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(3):285-292.
    183) Hendrickson RG & Bizovi KE : Acetaminophen. In: Flomenbaum NE, Goldfrank LR, and Hoffman RS, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies 8th ed., 8th. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2008, pp 523-524.
    184) Henne-Bruns D, Artwohl J, & Broelsch C: Acetaminophen-induced acute hepatic failure in pigs: controversial results to other animal models. Res Exp Med 1988; 188:463-472.
    185) Hjelle JJ & Grauer GF: Acetaminophen-induced toxicosis in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 188:742-746.
    186) Ho KM & Liang J: Toxic levels of paracetamol falsely elevate blood glucose readings by handheld glucose meter (Glucocard II). Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31(3):333-334.
    187) Ho SW & Beilin LJ: Asthma associated with N-acetylcysteine infusion and paracetamol poisoning: report of two cases. Br Med J 1983; 287:876-877.
    188) Ho SY, Arellano M, & Zolkowski-Wynne J: Delayed increase in acetaminophen concentration after Tylenol PM overdose (letter). Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17:315-316.
    189) Hoegberg LCG, Angelo HR, & Christophersen AB: Effect of ethanol and pH on the adsorption of acetaminophen (paracetamol) to high surface activated charcoal, in vitro studies. Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:59-67.
    190) Hord K, Phillips S, & McKinney P: The incidence of hyperamylasemia following acetaminophen overdose (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:343.
    191) Horowitz RS, Dart RC, & Jarvie DR: Placental transfer of N-acetylcysteine following human maternal acetaminophen toxicity. Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:447-451.
    192) Horsmans Y, Sempoux C, & Detry R: Paracetamol-induced liver toxicity after intravenous administration (letter). Liver 1998; 18:294-295.
    193) Huitema ADR, Soesan M, & Meenhorst PL: A dose-dependent delayed hypersensitivity reaction to acetaminophen after repeated acetaminophen intoxications. Hum & Exp Toxicol 1998; 17:406-408.
    194) Hutchinson DR, Smith MG, & Parke DV: Prealbumin as an index of liver functions after acute paracetamol poisoning. Lancet 1980; 2:121-123.
    195) Hynson JL & South M: Childhood hepatotoxicity with paracetamol doses less than 150 mg/kg per day. Med J Aust 1999; 171:497.
    196) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    197) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    198) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    199) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    200) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    201) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    202) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    203) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    204) Isbister GK, Bucens IK, & Whyte IM: Paracetamol overdose in a preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001b; 85:F70-F72.
    205) JEF Reynolds : Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopeia (electronic version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 1991; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    206) Jaeschke H & Mitchell JR: Neutrophil accumulation exacerbates acetaminophen-induced liver injury (Abstract 4031). FASEB J 1989; A920.
    207) Jeffery WH & Cafferty WE: Acute renal failure after acetaminophen overdose: report of two cases. Am J Hosp Pharm 1981; 38:1355-1358.
    208) Jones AL: Paracetamol poisoning - early determinants of poor prognosis and the need for hepatic transplantation (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:298-300.
    209) Jones AL: Recent advances in the management of late paracetamol poisoning. Emerg Med 2000; 12:14-21.
    210) Kadri AZ, Fisher R, & Winterton MC: Cimetidine and paracetamol hepatotoxicity. Hum Toxicol 1988; 7:205.
    211) Kamali F & Herd B: Liquid-liquid extraction and analysis of paracetamol (acetaminophen) and its major metabolites in biological fluids by reversed-phase ion-pair chromatography. J Chromatography 1990; 530:222-225.
    212) Kartsonis A, Reddy KR, & Schiff ER: Alcohol, acetaminophen, and hepatic necrosis. Ann Int Med 1986; 105:138-9.
    213) Karvellas CJ, Bagshaw SM, McDermid RC, et al: Acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure treated with single-pass albumin dialysis: report of a case. Int J Artif Organs 2008; 31(5):450-455.
    214) Katzir Z, Baruch O, & Hochman B: Spontaneous remission of paracetamol induced acute renal failure (letter). Clin Nephrol 1995; 43:346.
    215) Keays P, Harrison PM, & Wendon JA: Intravenous acetylcysteine in paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure. BMJ 1991; 303:1026-1029.
    216) Keays R, Harrison PM, & Wendon PA: Intravenous acetylcysteine in paracetamol-induced fulminatn hepatic failure: a prospective controlled trial. Br Med J 1991a; 303:1026-1029.
    217) Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Iisalo E, & Nordman E: Hepatoxicity of paracetamol in combination with interferon and vinblastine (letter). Lancet 1989; 1:1143.
    218) Kent DA, Willis GA, & Geddes R: Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose and hemolysis in a G6PD deficient patient (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:487.
    219) Kerr F, Dawson A, Whyte IM, et al: The Australian clinical toxicology investigators collaboration randomized trial of different loading infusion rates of N-acetylcysteine. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45:402-8.
    220) Kher K & Makker S: Acute renal failure due to acetaminophen ingestion without concurrent hepatotoxicity (letter). Am J Med 1987; 82:1280-1281.
    221) Kirk RW: Current Veterinary Therapy IX, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
    222) Kleiber C: Acetaminophen dosing for neonates, infants, and children. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2008; 13(1):48-49.
    223) Kocisova J & Sram RJ: Mutagenicity studies on paracetamol in human volunteers. III. Cytokinesis block micronucleus method. Mutation Res 1990; 244:27-30.
    224) Koppel C, Brockmoller J, & Roots I: Nephrotoxicity, but no substantial hepatotoxicity in severe acetaminophen overdose in carries of glutatione-S-transferase-u (abs), EAPCCT 15th congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 1992.
    225) Koppel C, Fahron G, & Lappenberg-Pelzer M: Association of nephrotoxicity in serious paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning with glutathione S-transferase -mu status. Clin Toxicol 1995; 52:229.
    226) Koulouris Z, Tierney MG, & Jones G: Metabolic acidosis and coma following a severe acetaminophen overdose. Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33:1191-1194.
    227) Kozer E & Koren G: Management of paracetamol overdose. Current controversies (review). Drug Safety 2001; 24:503-512.
    228) Kraemer FW & Rose JB: Pharmacologic management of acute pediatric pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2009; 27(2):241-268.
    229) Kramer LC, Richards PA, Thompson AM, et al: Alternating antipyretics: antipyretic efficacy of acetaminophen versus acetaminophen alternated with ibuprofen in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2008; 47(9):907-911.
    230) Kumar A, Goel KM, & Rae MD: Paracetamol overdose in children. Scot Med J 1990; 35:106-107.
    231) Kumar S & Rex DK: Failure of physicians to recognize acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in chronic alcoholics. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:1189-1191.
    232) Kyle ME, Miccadei S, & Nakae D: Superoxide dismutase and catalase protect cultured hepatocytes from the cytotoxicity of acetaminophen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1987; 149:889-896.
    233) Lacoma FJ, Oud L, & Kruse JA: Interference with blood lactate determination due to toxic substances associated with lactic acidosis. Crit Care Med 1997; 25(suppl):A53.
    234) Larsen FS, Kirkegaard P, & Rasmussen A: The Danish liver transplantation program and patients with serious acetaminophen intoxication. Transplant Prodeed 1995; 27:3519-3520.
    235) Laskin DL, Gardner CR, & Price VF: Modulation of macrophage functioning abrogates the acute hepatotoxicity of acetominophen. Hepatology 1995; 21:1045-1050.
    236) Lauterburg BH & Velez MA: Glutathione deficiency in alcoholics: risk factor for paracetamol hepatotoxicity. Gut 1988; 29:1153-1157.
    237) Lavonas EJ, Srisuma S, & Cao D: Fulminant Hepatic Failure in a Morbidly Obese Woman with safe 4-Hour Acetaminophen Concentration (abstracts). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):665.
    238) Lawrence IG, Lear J, & Burden AC: Hyperglycemia induced by paracetamol (letter). Postgrad Med J 1995; 71:702.
    239) Leih-Lai MW, Sarnaik AP, & Newton JF: Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen in a severely poisoned young child. J Pediatr 1984; 105:125-128.
    240) Leist MH, Gluskin LE, & Payne JA: Enhanced toxicity of acetaminophen in alcoholics: report of three cases. J Clin Gastroenterol 1985; 7:55-59.
    241) Li DK, Liu L, & Odouli R: Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327:368-372.
    242) Liew Z, Ritz B, Rebordosa C, et al: Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders. JAMA Peds 2014; Epub:Epub-.
    243) Lifshitz M, Weinstein O, & Gavrilov V: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) levels in human tears. Ther Drug Monitor 1999; 21:544-546.
    244) Linden CH & Rumack BH: Acetaminophen overdose. Emerg Clin North Am 1984; 2:103.
    245) Lip GYH & Vale JA: Does acetaminophen damage the heart?. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:145-147.
    246) Litalien C & Jacqz-Aigrain E: Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children: a comparison with paracetamol. Paediatr Drugs 2001; 3(11):817-858.
    247) Ludmir J, Main DM, & Landon MB: Maternal acetaminophen overdose at 15 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1986a; 67:750-751.
    248) Ludmir J, Main DM, Landon MB, et al: Maternal acetaminophen overdose at 15 weeks of gestation. Obst Gynecol 1986; 67:750-751.
    249) Maclean D, Peters TJ, & Brown RAG: Treatment of acute paracetamol poisoning. Lancet 1968; 2:849-852.
    250) Mahadevan SB, McKiernan PJ, Davies P, et al: Paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91(7):598-603.
    251) Makin A & Williams R: Paracetamol hepatotoxicity and alcohol consumption in deliberate and accidental overdose. Q J Med 2000; 93:341-349.
    252) Makin AJ, Wendon J, & Williams R: A 7-year experience of severe acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity (1987-1993). Gastroenterology 1995; 109:1907-1916.
    253) Matheson I, Lunde PKM, & Notarianni L: Infant rash caused by paracetamol in breast milk?. Pediatrics 1985; 76:651.
    254) Mathis RD, Walker JS, & Kuhns DW: Subacute acetaminophen overdose after incremental dosing. J Emerg Med 1988; 6:37-40.
    255) McClain CJ, Holtzman J, & Allen J: Clinical features of acetaminophen toxicity. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988; 10:76-80.
    256) McClain CJ, Kromhout JP, & Peterson FJ: Potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by alcohol. JAMA 1980; 244:251-253.
    257) McCormick PA, Treanor D, McCormack G, et al: Early death from paracetamol (acetaminophen) induced fulminant hepatic failure without cerebral oedema. J Hepatol 2003; 39(4):547-551.
    258) McCredie M & Stewart JH: Does paracetamol cause urothelial cancer or renal papillary necrosis?. Nephron 1988; 49:296-300.
    259) McElhatton PR, Sullivan FM, & Smith SE: Paracetamol poisoning in pregnancy. Teratology 1990a; 42:17A.
    260) McElhatton PR, Sullivan FM, & Volans GN: Paracetamol poisoning in pregnancy: an analysis of the outcomes of cases referred to the Teratology Information Service of the National Poisons Information Service. Hum Exp Toxicol 1990; 9:147-153.
    261) McElhatton PR, Sullivan FM, & Walton L: Analgesic overdose during pregnancy (abstract). Teratology 1991; 44:17A.
    262) McGovern AJ, Vitkovitsky IV, Jones DL, et al: Can AST/ALT ratio indicate recovery after acute paracetamol poisoning?. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(3):164-167.
    263) McIntyre CW, Fluck RJ, & Freeman JG: Use of albumin dialysis in the treatment of hepatic and renal dysfunction due to paracetamol intoxication (letter). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:316-317.
    264) McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals: Guidelines for the Mangement of Acetaminophen Overdose. McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals. Fort Wasthington, PA. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.tylenolprofessional.com/tylenolprofessional/assets/Overdose_Monograph.pdf. As accessed 2009-02-23.
    265) McNeil-PPC: Extra Strength TYLENOL(R) acetaminophen Caplets, Cool Caplets, EZ Tabs, Rapid Release Gels, and Adult Rapid Blast Liquid (Products and Dosing for Healthcare Professionals). McNeil-PPC. Skillman, NJ. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.tylenolprofessional.com/products/extra-strength-tylenol.html. As accessed 2010-11-05.
    266) McNeil-PPC: TYLENOL(R) 8 Hour Extended Release Caplets (Products and Dosing for Healthcare Professionals). McNeil-PPC. Skillman, NJ. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.tylenolprofessional.com/products/8-hour-extended-release-caplets.html. As accessed 2010-11-05.
    267) Mendoza CD, Heard K, & Dart RC: Coma, metabolic acidosis and normal liver function in a child with a large serum acetaminophen level. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48(5):637-.
    268) Miles FK, Kamath R, & Dorney SFA: Accidental paracetamol overdosing and fulminant hepatic failure in children. Med J Aust 1999; 171:472-475.
    269) Miller RP, Roberts RJ, & Fischer LJ: Acetaminophen kinetics in neonates, children and adults. Clin Pharmacol & Ther 1976; 19:284-94.
    270) Mills AT, Davidson ME, & Young P: Concealed paracetamol overdose treated as HELLP syndrome in the presence of postpartum liver dysfunction. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23(2):189-193.
    271) Minton NA, Henry JA, & Frankel RJ: Fatal paracetamol poisoning in an epileptic. Hum Toxicol 1988; 7:33-34.
    272) Mitchell I, Bihari D, & Chang R: Earlier identification of patients at risk from acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:279-284.
    273) Mitchell JR, Thorgeirsson SS, & Potter WZ: Acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury: protective role of glutathione in man and rational for therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974; 16:676-684.
    274) Mitchell JR: Acetaminophen toxicity (letter). N Engl J Med 1988; 319:1601-1602.
    275) Mitzner SR, Stange J, & Klammt S: Improvement of hepatorenal syndrome with extracorporeal albumin dialysis MARS: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Liver Transpl 2000; 6:277-286.
    276) Mofenson HC, Caraccio TR, & Nawaz H: Acetaminophen induced pancreatitis. Clin Toxicol 1991; 29:223-230.
    277) Mohammed S, Jamal AZ, & Robinson LR: Serum sickness-like illness assocated with N-acetylcysteine therapy (letter). Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28:285.
    278) Mohler CR, Nordt SP, & Williams SR: Prospective evaluation of mild to moderate pediatric acetaminophen exposures. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35:239-244.
    279) Monteagudo FSE & Folb PI: Paracetamol poisoning at Groote Schuur hospital. S Afr Med J 1987; 72:773-776.
    280) Moulding TS, Redeker AG, & Kanel GC: Acetaminophen, isoniazid, and hepatic toxicity (letter). Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:431.
    281) Mour G, Feinfeld DA, Caraccio T, et al: Acute renal dysfunction in acetaminophen poisoning. Renal Failure 2005; 27:381-383.
    282) Muller FO, van Achterbergh, & Hundt HKL: Paracetamol overdose. Protective effect of concomitantly ingested antimuscarinic drugs and codeine. Human Toxicol 1983; 3:473-477.
    283) Murphy C, Beuhler MC, Hart G, et al: Hemodialysis used to remove acetaminophen in patients with significantly elevated levels and hepatotoxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):702-703.
    284) Murphy R, Swartz R, & Watkins PB: Severe acetaminophen toxicity in a patient receiving isoniazid. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:799-800.
    285) Mutimer DJ, Ayres RC, & Neuberger JM: Serious paracetamol poisoning and the results of liver transplantation. Gut 1994; 35:809-814.
    286) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    287) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    288) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    289) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    290) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    291) Nasir AK & Walburn J: Poisoning with acetaminophen "Jello" (letter). Pediatrics 1997; 99:652-653.
    292) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    293) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    294) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    295) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    296) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    297) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    298) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    299) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    300) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    301) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    302) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    303) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    304) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    305) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    306) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    307) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    308) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    309) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    310) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    311) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    312) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    313) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    314) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    315) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    316) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    317) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    318) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    319) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    320) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    321) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    322) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    323) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    324) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    325) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    326) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    327) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    328) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    329) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    330) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    331) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    332) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    333) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    334) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    335) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    336) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    337) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    338) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    339) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    340) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    341) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    342) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    343) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    344) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    345) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for PhorateĀ (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    346) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    347) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    348) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    349) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    350) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    351) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    352) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    353) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    354) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    355) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    356) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    357) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    358) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    359) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    360) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    361) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    362) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    363) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    364) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    365) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    366) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    367) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    368) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    369) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    370) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    371) Neuberger J, Davis M, & Williams R: Long-term ingestion of paracetamol and liver disease. J Roy Soc Med 1980; 73:701-707.
    372) Ng KL, Davidson JS, & Bathgate AJ: Serum phosphate is not a reliable early predictor of outcome in paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity. Liver Transpl 2004; 10(1):158-159.
    373) Nolan CM, Sandblom RE, Thummel KE, et al: Hepatotoxicity associated with acetaminophen usage in patients receiving multiple drug therapy for tuberculosis. Chest 1994; 105:408-411.
    374) None Listed: Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004; 42(3):243-253.
    375) O'Grady JG, Gimson AES, & O'Brien CJ: Controlled trials of charcoal hemoperfusion and prognostic factors in fulminant hepatic failure. Gastroenterology 1988; 94:1186-1192.
    376) O'Grady JG, Wendon J, & Tan KC: Liver transplantation after acetaminophen overdose. BMJ 1991; 303:221-223.
    377) Osterloh J: Acetaminophen - interferences in lab tests (letter). AACT Clin Toxicol 1998; 11(2):2.
    378) Pakravan N, Bateman DN, & Goddard J: Effect of acute paracetamol overdose on changes in serum and urine electrolytes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64(6):824-832.
    379) Paloucek FP & Gorman SE: Utility and interpretation of serum acetaminophen (APAP) concentrations (C) drawn within 4 hours of an acute overdose (OD) (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 34:327.
    380) Paloucek FP, Lafin S, & Leikin JB: The use of serum acetaminophen sampling in an emergency room (Abstract 116). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:358.
    381) Parker D, White JP, & Paton D: Safety of late acetylcysteine treatment in paracetamol poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 1990; 9:25-27.
    382) Patel HV & Morton DJ: Specificity of a colorimetric paracetamol assay technique for use in cases of overdose. J Clin Pharm Ther 1988; 13:233-238.
    383) Pereira LM, Langley PG, & Hayllar KM: Coagulation factor V and V/VII ratio as predictors of outcomes in paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure: relation to other prognostic indicators. Gut 1992; 33:98-102.
    384) Perrone J, Hollander JE, & Shaw L: Predictive properties of a qualitative urine acetaminophen screen in patients with self-poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:769-772.
    385) Perrott DA, Piira T, Goodenough B, et al: Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen vs ibuprofen for treating children's pain or fever: a meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158(6):521-526.
    386) Pershad J, Nichols M, & King W: "The silent killer": chronic acetaminophen toxicity in a toddler. Ped Emerg Care 1999; 15:43-46.
    387) Persky V, Piorkowski J, Hernandez E, et al: Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and respiratory symptoms in the first year of life. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 101(3):271-278.
    388) Personal Communication: Personal Communication: Frederick W. Oehme, DVM, PhD, Comparative Toxicology Laboratories, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University. Comparative Toxicology Laboratories, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, 1991.
    389) Phadke G, Mahale A, Chemiti G, et al: Successful kidney transplants from a donor with acute hepatic failure due to acetaminophen overdose and acute kidney injury. Transplantation 2008; 86(2):368-369.
    390) Phillpotts S, Tash E, & Sen S: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: an unusual cause of acute jaundice after paracetamol overdose. Eur J Haematol 2014; 93(5):446-448.
    391) Pillans P & Hall C: Paracetamol-induced acute renal failure in the absence of severe liver damage. S Afr Med J 1985; 67:791-792.
    392) Pimstone BL & Uys CJ: Liver necrosis and myocardiopathy following paracetamol overdosage. S Afr Med J 1968; 42:259-262.
    393) Pitts J: False-positive paracetamol assay. Lancet 1979; 1:213.
    394) Pizon AF & LoVecchio F: Adverse reaction from use of intravenous N-acetylcysteine. J Emerg Med 2006; 31(4):434-435.
    395) Playfor S, Jenkins I, Boyles C, et al: Consensus guidelines on sedation and analgesia in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(8):1125-1136.
    396) Plumb DC: Veterinary Pharmacy Formulary, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 1989.
    397) Pol S & Lebray P: N-acetylcysteine for paracetamol poisoning: effect on prothrombin. Lancet 2002; 360:1115.
    398) Pollack MM, Dunbar BS, & Holbrook PR: Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contents. Ann Emerg Med 1981; 10:528-529.
    399) Potter DW, Pumford NR, & Hinson JA: Epitope characterization of acetaminophen bound protein and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1989; 248:182-189.
    400) Prescott LF & Critchley JA: Drug interactions affecting analgesic toxicity. Am J Med 1983; 75:113-116.
    401) Prescott LF, Illingworth RN, & Critchley JA: Intravenous N-acetylcysteine: the treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning. Br Med J 1979; 2:1097.
    402) Prescott LF, Proudfoot AT, & Cregeen RJ: Paracetamol-induced acute renal failure in the absence of fulminant liver damage. Br J Med 1982; 28:21.
    403) Prescott LF, Roscoe P, & Wright N: Plasma-paracetamol half-life and hepatic necrosis in patients with paracetamol overdose. Lancet 1971; 1:519-522.
    404) Prescott LF, Speirs GC, & Critchley JA: Paracetamol disposition and metabolite kinetics in patients with chronic renal failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36:291-297.
    405) Prescott LF: Paracetamol overdosage. Pharmacological considerations and clinical management.. Drugs 1983; 25:290-314.
    406) Prescott LF: Paracetamol, alcohol and the liver. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49:291-301.
    407) Product Information: ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, acetaminophen rectal suppositories. G&W Laboratories,Inc, South Plainfield, NJ, 2006.
    408) Product Information: ACEPHEN(TM) rectal suppositories, acetaminophen rectal suppositories. G&W Laboratories,Inc, South Plainfield, NJ, 2006a.
    409) Product Information: ACETADOTE(R) IV injection, acetylcysteine IV injection. Cumberland Pharmacuticals,Inc, Nashville, TN, 2006.
    410) Product Information: Acephen(TM) rectal suppositories, acetaminophen rectal suppositories. G & W Laboratories, Inc, South Plainfield, NJ, 2009.
    411) Product Information: Acetadote(R), Acetylcysteine injection. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc, Nashville, TN, USA, 2004.
    412) Product Information: CETYLEV oral effervescent tablets for solution, acetylcysteine oral effervescent tablets for solution. Arbor Pharmaceuticals (per FDA), Atlanta, GA, 2016.
    413) Product Information: CHILDREN'S SILAPAP oral liquid, acetaminophen oral liquid. Silarx Pharmaceuticals,Inc, Spring Valley, NY, 2006.
    414) Product Information: CHILDREN'S TYLENOL(R) oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension, acetaminophen oral flavor-creator liquid, oral dye-free liquid, meltaway oral tablets, oral suspension. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Morristown, NJ, 2007.
    415) Product Information: JR. TYLENOL(R) meltaway oral tablets, acetaminophen meltaway oral tablets. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Morristown, NJ, 2007.
    416) Product Information: OFIRMEV(R) intravenous injection, acetaminophen intravenous injection. Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (per FDA), San Diego, CA, 2013.
    417) Product Information: OFIRMEV(TM) intravenous infusion, acetaminophen intravenous infusion. Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA, 2010.
    418) Product Information: QUICKMELTS(TM) oral tablets, acetaminophen oral tablets. AmerisourceBergen, Valley Forge, PA, 2004.
    419) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) EXTRA STRENGTH chewable oral tablets, oral tablets, rapid-release oral gelcaps, oral geltabs, oral caplets, oral cool caplets, oral liquid, acetaminophen chewable oral tablets, oral tablets, rapid-release oral gelcaps, oral geltabs, oral caplets, oral cool caplets, oral liquid. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Morristown, NJ, 2007.
    420) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) INFANTS' DROPS oral suspension, acetaminophen oral suspension. McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Morristown, NJ, 2006.
    421) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) REGULAR STRENGTH oral tablets, acetaminophen oral tablets. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Morristown, NJ, 2007.
    422) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) SORE THROAT DAYTIME oral solution, acetaminophen oral solution. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Morristown, NJ, 2007.
    423) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) oral concentrated infant drops, acetaminophen oral concentrated infant drops. McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Fort Washington, PA, 2009.
    424) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) oral tablets, acetaminophen oral tablet. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, Guelph, Ontario, 2006.
    425) Product Information: TYLENOL(R) oral, acetaminophen oral. McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Skillman, NJ, 2010.
    426) Product Information: Tylenol(R), acetaminophen. McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, PA, 1999.
    427) Product Information: acetaminophen oral capsules, acetaminophen oral capsules. United Research Labotories,Inc, Philadelphia, PA, 2007.
    428) Product Information: acetaminophen oral solution, acetaminophen oral solution. Pharmaceutical Associates,Inc, Greenville, SC, 2002.
    429) Product Information: acetaminophen oral suspension, acetaminophen oral suspension. Mcneil Consumer Healthcare, 2006.
    430) Product Information: acetaminophen, codeine phosphate oral solution, acetaminophen, codeine phosphate oral solution. Pharmaceutical Associates,Inc, Greenville, SC, 2006.
    431) Product Information: acetylcysteine oral solution, solution for inhalation, acetylcysteine oral solution, solution for inhalation. Roxane Laboratories, Columbus, OH, 2007.
    432) Product Information: butalbital acetaminophen caffeine codeine phosphate oral capsules, butalbital acetaminophen caffeine codeine phosphate oral capsules. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp. (per DailyMed), Eatontown, NJ, 2014.
    433) Product Information: pentazocine acetaminophen oral tablets, pentazocine acetaminophen oral tablets. Watson Pharma, Inc. (per DailyMed), Parsippany, NJ, 2013.
    434) Pumford NR, Hinson JA, & Potter DW: Immunochemical quantitation of 3-(cystein-S-yl)acetaminophen in serum and liver proteins of acetaminophen-treated mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1989; 248:190-196.
    435) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2000; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    436) Rau NR, Nagaraj MV, Prakash PS, et al: Fatal pulmonary aspiration of oral activated charcoal. Br Med J 1988; 297:918-919.
    437) Raucy JL, Lasker JM, & Lieber CS: Acetaminophen activation by human liver cytochromes P450IIE1 and P450IA2. Arch Biochem Biophysics 1989; 271:270-283.
    438) Ray JE, Stove J, & Williams KM: A rapid urinary screen for acetaminophen modified to avoid false-negative results (Tech Brief). Clin Chem 1987; 33:718.
    439) Rayburn W, Shukla U, & Stetson P: Acetaminophen pharmacokinetics: comparison between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155:1353-1356.
    440) Reed RG, Guiney WB, & Collier SA: Salicylate interference with measurement of acetaminophen. Clin Chem 1982; 28:2178-2179.
    441) Reynard K, Riley A, & Walker BE: Respiratory arrest after N-acetylcysteine for paracetamol overdose. Lancet 1992; 340:675.
    442) Rickner S & Simpson S-E: Hemolytic Crisis Following Acetaminophen Overdose in a Patient with G6PD. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):704-705.
    443) Riggs BS, Bronstein AC, & Kulig K: Acute acetaminophen overdose during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:247-252.
    444) Roberts DW, Pumford NR, & Potter DW: A sensitive immunochemical assay for acetaminophen-protein adducts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987; 241:527-533.
    445) Rollins DE, Bahr CU, & Glaumann H: Acetaminophen: potentially toxic metabolite formed by human fetal and adult liver microsomes and isolated fetal liver cells. Science 1979; 205:1414-1416.
    446) Rose SR, Gorman RL, & Oderda GM: Simulated acetaminophen overdose: pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of activated charcoal. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:29-33.
    447) Roth B, Woo O, & Blanc P: Early metabolic acidosis and coma after acetaminophen ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33:452-456.
    448) Ruha AM, Selden B, & Curry S: Hemolytic anemia after acetaminophen overdose in a patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (letter). Am J Med 2001; 110:240-241.
    449) Rumack BH & Matthew H: Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity. Pediatrics 1975; 55:871-76.
    450) Rumack BH, Peterson RC, & Koch GG: Acetaminophen overdose. 662 cases with evaluation of oral acetylcysteine treatment. Arch Intern Med 1981a; 141:380-5.
    451) Rumack BH, Peterson RC, & Koch GG: Acetaminophen overdose: 662 cases with evaluation of oral acetylcysteine treatment. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:380-385.
    452) Rumack BH: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity: the first 35 years. Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:3-20.
    453) Rumack BH: Acetaminophen overdose in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986; 33:691-701.
    454) Rumack BH: Acetaminophen overdose in young children. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138:428-433.
    455) Rumack BH: Acetaminophen overdose. Am J Med 1983; 75(5A):104-112.
    456) Rumbeiha WK & Oehme FW: Methylene blue can be used to treat methemoglobinemia in cats without introducing Heinz body hemolytic anemia. J Vet Hum Toxicol 1992; 43:120-122.
    457) Rumore MM & Blaiklock RG: Influence of age-dependent pharmacokinetics and metabolism on acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. J Pharm Sci 1992; 81:203-207.
    458) Sahajwalla CG & Ayres JW: Multiple-dose acetaminophen pharmacokinetics. J Pharmaceut Sci 1991; 80:855-860.
    459) Sakaida I, Kayano K, & Wasaki S: Protection against acetaminophen-induced liver injury in vivo by an iron chelator, deferoxamine. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995; 30:61-67.
    460) Sanaka M, Kuyama Y, & Mineshita S: Pharmacokinetic interaction between acetaminophen and lansoprazole. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999; 29:56-58.
    461) Sanerkin NG: Acute myocardial necrosis in paracetamol poisoning (letter). Br Med J 1971; 3:478.
    462) Sato C & Izumi N: Mechanism of increased hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen by the simultaneous administration of caffeine in the rat. J Pharmacol Exper Ther 1989; 248:1243-1247.
    463) Sato C & Lieber CS: Mechanism of the preventive effect of ethanol on acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1981; 218:811-815.
    464) Sauer IM, Zeilinger K, Pless G, et al: Extracorporeal liver support based on primary human liver cells and albumin dialysis--treatment of a patient with primary graft non-function. J Hepatol 2003; 39(4):649-653.
    465) Savides MC, Oehme FW, & Leipold HW: Effects of various antidotal treatments on acetaminophen toxicosis and biotransformation in cats. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46:1485-1489.
    466) Scavone JM, Blyden GT, & Greenblatt DJ: Lack of effect of influenza vaccine on the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine, alprazolam, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and lorazepam. Clin Pharmacokinet 1989; 16:180-185.
    467) Schiodt FV, Bondesen S, & Tygstrup N: Prediction of hepatic encephalopathy in paracetamol overdose: A prospective and validated study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 7:723-728.
    468) Schiodt FV, Ott P, & Tygstrup N: Temporal profile of total, bound, and free Gc-globulin after acetaminophen overdose. Liver Transpl 2001; 7:732-738.
    469) Schmidt LE & Dalhoff K: Alpha-fetoprotein is a predictor of outcome in acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Hepatology 2005; 41(1):26-31.
    470) Schmidt LE & Dalhoff K: Hyperamylasaemia and acute pancreatitis in paracetamol poisoning. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20(2):173-179.
    471) Schmidt LE & Dalhoff K: Risk factors in the development of adverse reactions to N-acetylcysteine in patients with paracetamol poisoning. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 51:87-91.
    472) Schmidt LE & Dalhoff K: Serum phosphate is an early predictor of outcome in severe acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Hepatology 2002a; 36:659-665.
    473) Schmidt LE & Dalhoff K: The impact of current tobacco use on the outcome of paracetamol poisoning. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18(10):979-985.
    474) Schmidt LE & Larsen FS: Prognostic implications of hyperlactatemia, multiple organ failure, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(2):337-343.
    475) Schmidt LE, Dalhoff K, & Poulsen HE: Acute versus chronic alcohol consumption in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Hepatol 2002; 35:876-882.
    476) Schmidt LE, Knudsen TT, Dalhoff K, et al: Effect of acetylcysteine on prothrombin index in paracetamol poisoning without hepatocellular injury. Lancet 2002a; 360:1151-1152.
    477) Schmidt LE: Age and paracetamol self-poisoning. Gut 2005; 54(5):686-690.
    478) Schneider F, Neuville A, Meziani F, et al: Coingestion of cyclooxygenase inhibitors can worsen severe paracetamol poisoning by middle-sized and small arteries vasoconstriction. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29(11):2090-2093.
    479) Seeff LB, Cuccherini BA, & Zimmerman HJ: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in alcoholics. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:399-404.
    480) Shannon MW, Saladino R, & McCarthy DL: Field trial of a rapid acetaminophen meter (Abstract 113). Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:358.
    481) Singer AJ, Carractio TR, & Mofenson HC: The temporal profile of increased transaminase levels in patients with acetaminophen-induced liver dysfunction. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:49-53.
    482) Singer PP, Jones GR, Bannach BG, et al: Acute fatal acetaminophen overdose without liver necrosis. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52(4):992-994.
    483) Sivilotti ML, Yarema MC, Juurlink DN, et al: A risk quantification instrument for acute acetaminophen overdose patients treated with N-acetylcysteine. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46(3):263-271.
    484) Sivilotti MLA, Burns MJ, & Linden CH: a-GST as a biomarker of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:641.
    485) Sklar GE: Hemolysis as a potential complication of acetaminophen overdose in a patient with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Pharmacother 2002; 22:656-658.
    486) Slattery JT & Levy G: Acetaminophen kinetics in acutely poisoned patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25:184-195.
    487) Slattery JT, Wilson JM, & Kalhorn TF: Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen: evidence of glutathione depletion in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41:413-418.
    488) Slitt AL, Dominick PK, Roberts JC, et al: Standard of care may not protect against acetaminophen-induced nephrotoxicity. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2004; 95(5):247-248.
    489) Smilkstein MJ, Bronstein AC, & Linden C: Acetaminophen overdose: a 48-hour intravenous n-acetylcysteine treatment protocol. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:1058-1063.
    490) Smilkstein MJ, Knapp GL, & Kulig KW: Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose: analysis of the National Multicenter Study (1976 to 1985). N Engl J Med 1988; 319:1557-1562.
    491) Smilkstein MJ, Knapp GL, & Kulig KW: Reply (letter). N Engl J Med 1989a; 320:1418.
    492) Smith DW, Isakson G, & Frankel LR: Hepatic failure following ingestion of multiple doses of acetaminophen in a young child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1986; 5:822-825.
    493) Smith SW, Howland MA, Hoffman RS, et al: Acetaminophen overdose with altered acetaminophen pharmacokinetics and hepatotoxicity associated with premature cessation of intravenous N-acetylcysteine therapy. Ann Pharmacother 2008; 42(9):1333-1339.
    494) Spiller HA & Rogers GC: Evaluation of administration of activated charcoal in the home. Pediatrics 2002; 108:E100.
    495) Spiller HA & Sawyer TS: Impact of activated charcoal after acute acetaminophen overdoses treated with N-acetylcysteine. J Emerg Med 2007; 33(2):141-144.
    496) Spiller HA, Krenzelok EP, & Grande GA: A prospective evaluation of the effect of the use of activated charcoal before oral N-acetylcysteine therapy in acetaminophen overdose. Ann Emer MEd 1994; 23:519-523.
    497) Stark KL, Lee QP, & Namkung MJ: Dysmorphogenesis elicited by microinjected acetaminophen analogs and metabolites in rat embryos cultured in vitro. J Pharmacol Exper Therapeut 1990; 255:74-82.
    498) Steelman R, Goodman A, Biswas S, et al: Metabolic acidosis and coma in a child with acetaminophen toxicity. Clin Pediatr 2004; 43:201-203.
    499) Stewart MJ, Adriaenssens PI, & Jarvie DR: Inappropriate methods for the emergency determination of plasma paracetamol. Ann Clin Biochem 1979; 16:89-95.
    500) Stork CM, Rees S, & Howland MA: Pharmacokinetics of extended relief (ER) vs regular release (RR) tylenol (APAP) in a simulated human overdose model (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:511.
    501) Stricker BH, Meyboom RH, & Lindquist M: Acute hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol. Br Med J 1985; 291:938-939.
    502) Suchin SM, Wolf DC, Lee Y, et al: Potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by phenytoin, leading to liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50(10):1836-1838.
    503) Sung L, Simons JA, & Dayneka NL: Dilution of intravenous N-acetylcysteine as a cause of hyponatremia. Pediatrics 1997; 100:389-391.
    504) Syva Company: EMIT(R) Acetaminophen Assay, Syva Co, Palo Alto, CA, 1984.
    505) Tenenbein M: Pediatric paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: the 150 mg/kg myth (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:261.
    506) Thakore S & Murphy N: The potential role of prehospital administration of activated charcoal. Emerg Med J 2002; 19:63-65.
    507) Thomson JS & Prescott LF: Liver damage and impaired glucose-tolerance after paracetamol overdosage. Br Med J 1966; 5512:506-507.
    508) Thornton JR & Losowsky MS: Fatal variceal haemorrhage after paracetamol overdose. Gut 1989; 30:1424-1425.
    509) Thornton JR & Losowsky MS: Severe thrombocytopenia after paracetamol overdose. Gut 1990; 31:1159-1160.
    510) Thulstrup AM, Sorensen HT, Nielsen GL, et al: Fetal growth and adverse birth outcomes in women receiving prescriptions for acetaminophen during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16:321-326.
    511) Thummel KE, Slattery JT, & Nelson SD: Effect of ethanol on hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen in mice and on reactive metabolite formation by mouse and human liver microsomes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1989; 100:391-397.
    512) Thummel KE, Slattery JT, & Nelson SD: Mechanism by which ethanol diminishes the hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988; 245:129-136.
    513) Thummel KE, Slattery JT, & Ro H: Ethanol and production of the hepatotoxic metabolite of acetaminophen in healthy adults. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 67:591-599.
    514) Tighe TV & Walter FG: Delayed toxic acetaminophen level after initial four hour nontoxic level. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:431-434.
    515) Tsai CL, Chang WT, Weng TI, et al: A patient-tailored n-acetylcysteine protocol for acute acetaminophen intoxication. Clin Ther 2005; 27:336-341.
    516) Tsang WO & Nadroo AM: An unusual case of acetaminophen overdose. Ped Emerg Care 1999; 15:344-346.
    517) Tucker JR: Late-presenting acute acetaminophen toxicity and the role of N-acetylcysteine. Ped Emerg Care 1998; 14:424-426.
    518) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    519) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    520) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    521) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    522) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    523) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    524) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    525) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    526) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    527) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    528) Vale JA & Wheeler DC: Anaphylactoid reactions to IV acetylcysteine. Lancet 1982; 2:988.
    529) Van Lingen RA, Deinum HT, & Quak CME: Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of rectally administered acetaminophen in term infants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66:509-515.
    530) Van Tittelboom T & Govaerts-Lepicard M: Hypothermia: an unusual side effect of paracetamol. Vet Hum Toxicol 1989; 31:57-59.
    531) Van de Graff WB, Thompson WL, & Sunshine I: Adsorbant and cathartic inhibition of enteral drug absorption. J Pharm Exp Ther 1982; 221:656-63.
    532) Van der Steeg J, Akhtar J, & Burkhart K: Initial prothrombin time as a predictor of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:508.
    533) Van der Steeg J, DiSanto SK, & Abendroth TW: The effect of acetaminophen on the prothrombin time assay (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995a; 33:512.
    534) Vraa EP, Watson WA, & Neau SH: Dissolution of TYLENOL(R) dosage formulations under overdose conditions (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:510.
    535) Waksman JC, Fantuzzi G, & Bogdan GM: Decreased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) following acute acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is associated with hepatic injury (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:486.
    536) Wallace KP, Center SA, & Hickford FH: S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of acetaminophen toxicity in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002; 38:246-254.
    537) Walsh TS, Wigmore SJ, & Hopton P: Energy expenditure in acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Crit Card Med 2000; 28:649-654.
    538) Walton NG, Mann TA, & Shaw KM: Anaphylactoid reaction to n-acetylcysteine. Lancet 1979; 2:1298.
    539) Waring WS, Stephen AF, Malkowska AM, et al: Acute acetaminophen overdose is associated with dose-dependent hypokalaemia: a prospective study of 331 patients. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008; 102(3):325-328.
    540) Waring WS, Stephen AF, Malkowska AM, et al: Acute ethanol coingestion confers a lower risk of hepatotoxicity after deliberate acetaminophen overdose. Acad Emerg Med 2008a; 15(1):54-58.
    541) Wax P, Branton T, & Cobaugh D: False positive ethylene glycol determination by enzyme assay in patients with chronic acetaminophen hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol - Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:604.
    542) Weiss DJ, McClay CB, & Christopher MM: Effects of propylene glycol-containing diets on acetaminophen-induced methemoglobinemia in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990; 196:1816-1819.
    543) Wendel A & Feuerstein S: Drug-induced lipid peroxidation in mice - I: modulation by monooxygenase activity, glutathione and selenium status. Biochem Pharmacol 1981; 30:2513-2520.
    544) Weston MJ & Williams R: Paracetamol and the heart (letter). Lancet 1976; 1:536.
    545) Weston MJ, Talbot IC, & Howorth PJN: Frequency of arrhythmias and other cardiac abnormalities in fulminant hepatic failure. Br Heart J 1976; 38:1179-1188.
    546) Whitcomb DC & Block GD: Association of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity with fasting and ethanol use. JAMA 1994; 272:1845-1850.
    547) Whyte IM, Buckley NA, & Dawson AH: Increased INR and reduced functional factor VII in acetaminophen poisoning without evidence of hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1999a; 37:642.
    548) Whyte IM, Buckley NA, & Reith D: Mechanism of prothrombin time prolongation in paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning without hepatotoxicity (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1999; 37:384.
    549) Whyte IM, Buckley NA, & Reith DM: Acetaminophen causes an increased international normalized ratio by reducing functional factor VII. Ther Drug Monitor 2000; 22:742-748.
    550) Will EJ & Tomkins AM: Acute myocardial necrosis in paracetamol poisoning (letter). Br Med J 1971; 4:430-431.
    551) Williams R: Hepatic encephalopathy. J Royal Coll Physicians London 1973; 8:63-74.
    552) Williamson K, Wahl MS, & Mycyk MB: Direct comparison of 20-hour IV, 36-hour oral, and 72-hour oral acetylcysteine for treatment of acute acetaminophen poisoning. Am J Ther 2013; 20(1):37-40.
    553) Wolf SJ, Heard K, Sloan EP, et al: Clinical policy: critical issues in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acetaminophen overdose. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50(3):292-313.
    554) Woo OF, Anderson IB, & Kim SY: Shorter duration of n-acetylcysteine (NAC) for acute acetaminophen poisoning (abstract). J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:508.
    555) Woo OF, Mueller PD, Olson KR, et al: Shorter duration of oral N-acetylcysteine therapy for acute acetaminophen overdose. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35(4):363-368.
    556) Wooton FT & Lee WM: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in the alcoholic. South Med J 1990; 83:1047-9.
    557) Yang C-C, Deng J-F, & Lin T-J: Pancytopenia, hyperglycemia, shock, coma, rhabdomyolysis, and pancreatitis associated with acetaminophen poisoning. Vet Human Toxicol 2001; 43:344-348.
    558) Yang S-S, Hughes RD, & Williams R: Digoxin-like immunoreactive substances in severe acute liver disease due to viral hepatitis and paracetamol overdose. Hepatology 1988; 8:93-97.
    559) Yerman B, Tseng J, & Caravati EM: Pediatric acetaminophen ingestion: a prospective study of referral criteria (abstract).. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:530.
    560) Zenger F, Russmann S, Junker E, et al: Decreased glutathione in patients with anorexia nervosa. Risk factor for toxic liver injury?. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004; 58(2):238-243.
    561) Zezulka A & Wright N: Severe metabolic acidosis early in paracetamol poisoning. Br Med J 1982; 285:851.
    562) Zhang J, Huang W, Chua SS, et al: Modulation of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by the xenobiotic receptor CAR. Science 2002; 298(5592):422-424.
    563) vonMach MA, Hermanns-Clausen M, Koch I, et al: Experiences of a poison center network with renal insufficiency in acetaminophen overdose: an analysis of 17 cases. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43(1):31-37.