MOBILE VIEW  | 

CORROSIVES-ALKALINE

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Alkaline substances produce hydroxide ions on contact with water. The ability of an alkaline substance to produce corrosive injury depends on its concentration, pH, viscosity, titratable alkaline reserve, the amount ingested, and the duration of contact with tissue (Leape, 1974; Vancura et al, 1980; van Heijst, 1983; Hoffman et al, 1989).
    B) Alkaline agents are proton acceptors with significant caustic injury generally occurring at a pH above 11. Alkalies come in solid and liquid forms with different viscosities and concentrations (Rao & Hoffman, 1998). Significant corrosive injury is unlikely to occur from substances with a pH less than 11 (Vancura et al, 1980).

Specific Substances

    A) CONSTITUENTS OF THE GROUP
    1) calcium carbide
    2) calcium hydroxide
    3) calcium oxide
    4) caustic potash
    5) caustic soda
    6) diethylene triamine
    7) disodium trisilicate
    8) disodium silicate
    9) disodium disilicate
    10) dipotassium carbonate
    11) ethylamine solution
    12) hexasodium metaphosphate
    13) hydrated lime
    14) isopropylamine
    15) isopropyl aminoethanol
    16) kalium carbonicum
    17) kaliumhydroxid (German)
    18) kalkhydrate
    19) kemikal
    20) KOH
    21) limbux
    22) lime
    23) lime hydrate
    24) lime milk
    25) lime water
    26) lye, (potassium hydroxide)
    27) lye (sodium hydroxide)
    28) lye, dry, solid (potassium hydroxide)
    29) milk of lime
    30) pearl ash
    31) potassa
    32) potassium carbonate
    33) potassium hydrate
    34) potassium hydroxide
    35) potassium metasilicate
    36) potassium oxide
    37) salt of tartar
    38) sodium carbonate
    39) sodium hydroxide
    40) sodium metasilicate
    41) sodium oxide
    42) sodium silicate
    43) sodium tripolylphosphate
    44) trisodium phosphate
    GENERAL TERMS
    1) POTASSIUM (HYDROXYDE DE) (FRENCH)
    2) POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE, LIQUID OR SOLUTION
    3) POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE, DRY, SOLID, FLAKE, BEAD, OR GRANULAR
    4) POTASSE CAUSTIQUE (FRENCH)
    5) SODIUM PHOSPHATE DODECAHYDRATE
    6) PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRISODIUM SALT, DODECAHYDRATE
    7) PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRISODIUM SALT
    8) PHOSPHATE, SODIUM HEXAMETA
    9) PENTASODIUM TRIPOLYPHOSPHATE
    10) POTASSIO (IDROSSIDO DI) (ITALIAN)
    11) SODIUM POLYMETA PHOSPHATE
    12) TRISODIUM ORTHOPHOSPHATE
    13) TRIPOLYPHOSPHATE
    14) TRIPHOSPHORIC ACID, PENTASODIUM SALT
    15) TRINATRIUMPHOSPHAT (GERMAN) TRIMETAPHOSPHATE
    16) TRIBASIC SODIUM PHOSPHATE
    17) TRIBASIC SODIUM ORTHOPHOSPHATE
    18) TERTIARY SODIUM PHOSPHATE
    19) SOLUBLE GLASS
    20) SODIUM TRISILICATE
    21) SODIUM TRIPOLYPHOSPHATE
    22) SODIUM TRIMETAPHOSPHATE
    23) SODIUM PHOSPHATE
    24) SODIUM SILICATE (SIO2/NA2O(2/1))
    25) SILICIC ACID, SODIUM SALT
    26) SODIUM PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC (DODECAHYDRATE)
    27) SODIUM PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC (ANHYDROUS)
    28) SODIUM PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC
    29) MEK PEROXIDE, NOT MORE THAN 60% PEROXIDE
    30) SODIUM PHOSPHATE, ANHYDROUS
    31) PENTASODIUM TRIPHOSPHATE
    32) SODIUM ORTHOPHOSPHATE, TERTIARY
    33) SODIUM, METAL, LIQUID ALLOY
    34) SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE
    35) SODIUM DISILICATE
    36) SODA LYE (SOLID)
    37) SODA LYE (LIQUID)
    38) SLAKED LIME
    39) SODIUM SILICATES
    40) DEN (DIETHYLAMINE)
    41) METAPHOSPHORIC ACID, HEXASODIUM SALT
    42) ETHYLAMINE, AQUEOUS SOLUTION WITH NOT LESS THAN 50% BUT NOT MORE THAN 70% ETHYLAMINE
    43) ETHYL METHYL KETONE PEROXIDE, WITH NOT MORE THAN 60%, IN SOLUTION
    44) ETHANAMINE, AQUEOUS SOLUTION
    45) DWUETYLOAMINA (POLISH)
    46) DMA (DIMETHYLAMINE)
    47) DIETILAMINA (ITALIAN)
    48) DIETHAMINE
    49) DIBUTYLHEXANEDIAMINE
    50) HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, SODIUM SALT
    51) CARBONATE OF POTASH
    UNSPECIFIED
    1) AI3-24215
    2) AMINOETHYLETHANDIAMINE
    3) AMMONIUM DICHROMAT (GERMAN)
    4) BIOCALC
    5) CALCIUM DIHYDROXIDE
    6) DIAETHYLAMIN (GERMAN)
    7) CALVIT
    8) DETA
    9) CARBOXIDE
    10) CAUSTIC LIME
    11) CAUSTIC POTASH
    12) CAUSTIC POTASH, DRY, SOLID, FLAKE, BEAD, OR GRANULAR
    13) CAUSTIC POTASH, LIQUID OR SOLUTION
    14) HEXASODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE
    15) CALCIUM HYDRATE
    16) LITHIUM HYDRIDE, FUSED, SOLID
    17) NATRIUMTRIPOLYPHOSPHAT (GERMAN)
    18) NATRIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHAT (GERMAN)
    19) MONOETHYLAMINE, AQUEOUS SOLUTION
    20) MILK OF LIME
    21) METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE, WITH NOT MORE THAN 60% PEROXIDE
    22) METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE, WITH NOT MORE THAN 40% PEROXIDE
    23) METAPHOSPHORIC ACID, TRISODIUM SALT
    24) TSP (SODIUM PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC (ANHYDROUS))
    25) METAPHOSPHORIC ACID (H6P6O18)
    26) SODIUM TERTIARY PHOSPHATE
    27) MEK PEROXIDE, NOT MORE THAN 40% PEROXIDE
    28) ETHYLAMINE SOLUTION
    29) KEMIKAL
    30) HEXASODIUM METAPHOSPHATE
    31) HYDRATED LIME
    32) HYDROXYDE DE POTASSIUM (FRENCH)
    33) KALIUM CARBONICUM
    34) KALIUMHYDROXID (GERMAN)
    35) LYE, DRY, SOLID (SODIUM HYDROXIDE)
    36) KALKHYDRATE
    37) LYE, DRY, SOLID (POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE)
    38) KOH
    39) LIMBUX
    40) LIME HYDRATE
    41) LIME MILK
    42) LIME WATER
    43) PEARL ASH (POTASSIUM CARBONATE)
    44) KALIUMHYDROXYDE (DUTCH)
    45) SODIUM SILICATE (SIO2/NA2O(3/1))

Available Forms Sources

    A) USES
    1) Alkaline corrosives are used as drain openers, oven cleaners, cleaners for dairy and industrial pipelines, denture cleaners, bathroom and household cleaners, hair relaxers (pH of 11 to 14), cleaners of non-disposable glass containers used in the soft drink and beer industries, and in electric dishwasher soaps and low phosphate detergents (Patrick et al, 1986; Mackenzie, 1982; Howell, 1991) Edmondson, 1987; (Vilogi et al, 1985; Forsen & Muntz, 1993; Mrvos et al, 1995; Mrvos & Krenzelok, 1997; Stefanidou et al, 1997). Oven-cleaner pads may contain lye in excess of 5% (Vilogi et al, 1985). A corrosive alkaline aerosol (sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate) is released following the activation of an automobile air bag (White et al, 1995; Corazza et al, 2004).
    2) Clinitest tablets contain sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate and produce corrosive burns when swallowed (Burrington, 1975; Genieser & Becker, 1969).
    3) Portland cement when mixed with water forms 60% to 65% calcium oxide (quick lime or unslaked lime).
    4) Sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, numerous high-temperature gases, and various metallic oxides producing a corrosive alkaline aerosol is formed when automobile air bags are deployed and may be released into the passenger compartment (Corazza et al, 2004; Swanson-Biearman et al, 1993).
    5) Household bleaches (4% to 6% sodium hypochloride) are capable of producing superficial mucosal burns (Landau & Saunders, 1964).
    6) The ingestion of a home concoction of lye, water, and urine used to determine the sex of an unborn child has resulted in esophageal burns in two children (Grenga, 1983).
    7) Hair relaxer exposures in children (n=41), with the major route of exposure being oral, were examined retrospectively. It was found that only minor medical consequences were recorded, with ingestions involving an unknown amount up to one ounce. Seventeen esophagoscopies were performed, with all reported as negative (Mrvos et al, 1995; Mrvos & Krenzelok, 1997).
    8) Desiccant packets from countries outside of the United States may contain strong alkali. In one case, a toddler swallowed a desiccant packet containing caustic lime, with a pH of 11. Desiccant packets produced in the United States usually contain non-toxic agents, such as silica gel (Schier et al, 2002).
    9) Chuna packets (edible calcium hydroxide paste) is a popular additive to chewing tobacco in India. Bursting of the packets may result in severe ocular burns (Agarwal et al, 2006).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Used as drain openers, household cleaners (oven, bathroom), hair relaxers, dishwasher soap, and in automobile air bags. In industry used as cleaners, in cement, and as chemical precursors.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Alkaline corrosives cause liquefaction necrosis. They saponify the fats in the cell membrane, destroying the cell and allowing deep penetration into mucosal tissue. In gastrointestinal tissue an initial inflammatory phase may be followed by tissue necrosis (sometimes resulting in perforation), then granulation and finally stricture formation.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure is common. Serious effects are rare in the developed world (generally only seen in adults with deliberate ingestion), largely because mostly low concentration corrosives are present in products available in the home. Serious effects are more common in developing countries.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE ORAL TOXICITY: Patients with mild ingestions may only develop irritation or grade I (superficial hyperemia and edema) burns of the oropharynx, esophagus or stomach; acute or chronic complications are unlikely. Patients with moderate toxicity may develop grade II burns (superficial blisters, erosions and ulcerations) are at risk for subsequent stricture formation, particularly esophageal. Some patients (particularly young children) may develop upper airway edema.
    a) Alkaline corrosive ingestion may produce burns to the oropharynx, upper airway, esophagus and occasionally stomach. Spontaneous vomiting may occur. The absence of visible oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the presence of esophageal burns. The presence of stridor, vomiting, drooling, and abdominal pain are associated with serious esophageal injury in most cases.
    b) PREDICTIVE: The grade of mucosal injury at endoscopy is the strongest predictive factor for the occurrence of systemic and GI complications and mortality.
    2) SEVERE ORAL TOXICITY: May develop deep burns and necrosis of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Complications often include perforation (esophageal, gastric, rarely duodenal), fistula formation (tracheoesophageal, aortoesophageal), and gastrointestinal bleeding. Hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea and, rarely, fever may develop. Stricture formation (esophageal, less often oral or gastric) is likely to develop long term. Esophageal carcinoma is another long term complication. Upper airway edema is common and often life threatening. Severe toxicity is generally limited to deliberate ingestions in adults in the US, because alkaline products available in the home are generally of low concentration.
    3) INHALATION EXPOSURE: Mild exposure may cause cough and bronchospasm. Severe inhalation may cause upper airway edema and burns, stridor, and rarely acute lung injury.
    4) OCULAR EXPOSURE: Ocular exposure can produce severe conjunctival irritation and chemosis, corneal epithelial defects, limbal ischemia, permanent visual loss and in severe cases perforation.
    5) DERMAL EXPOSURE: Mild exposure causes irritation and partial thickness burns. Metabolic acidosis may develop in patients with severe burns or shock. Prolonged exposure or high concentration products can cause full thickness burns.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Obtain a complete blood count in symptomatic patients following an alkaline corrosive ingestion.
    B) In patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions), obtain renal function tests, serum electrolytes, INR, PTT, type and crossmatch for blood, and monitor urine output. Serum lactate and base deficit may also be useful in these patients.
    C) Monitor pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of upper airway edema or burns.
    D) Obtain an upright chest x-ray in patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions) to evaluate for pneumomediastinum or free air under the diaphragm. The absence of these findings DOES NOT rule out the possibility of necrosis or perforation of the esophagus or stomach. Obtain a chest radiograph in patients with pulmonary signs or symptoms.
    E) Several weeks after ingestion, barium contrast radiographs of the upper GI tract are useful in patients who sustained grade II or III burns, to evaluate for strictures.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE ORAL TOXICITY
    1) Perform early (within 12 hours) endoscopy in patients with stridor, drooling, vomiting, significant oral burns, difficulty swallowing or abdominal pain, and in all patients with deliberate ingestion. If burns are absent or grade I severity, patient may be discharged when able to tolerate liquids and soft foods by mouth. If mild grade II burns, admit for intravenous fluids, slowly advance diet as tolerated. Perform barium swallow or repeat endoscopy several weeks after ingestion (sooner if difficulty swallowing) to evaluate for stricture formation.
    B) SEVERE ORAL TOXICITY
    1) Resuscitate with 0.9% saline; blood products may be necessary. Early airway management in patients with upper airway edema or respiratory distress. Early (within 12 hours) gastrointestinal endoscopy to evaluate for burns. Early bronchoscopy in patients with respiratory distress or upper airway edema. Early surgical consultation for patients with severe grade II or grade III burns, large deliberate ingestions, or signs, symptoms or laboratory findings concerning for tissue necrosis or perforation.
    C) DILUTION
    1) Dilute with 4 to 8 ounces of water may be useful if it can be performed shortly after ingestion in patients who are able to swallow, with no vomiting or respiratory distress; then the patient should be NPO until assessed for the need for endoscopy. Neutralization, activated charcoal, and gastric lavage are all contraindicated.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Aggressive airway management in patients with deliberate ingestions or any indication of upper airway injury.
    E) ENDOSCOPY
    1) Should be performed as soon as possible (preferably within 12 hours, not more than 24 hours) in any patient with deliberate ingestion, adults with any signs or symptoms attributable to inadvertent ingestion, and in children with stridor, vomiting, or drooling after inadvertent ingestion. Endoscopy should also be considered in children with dysphagia or refusal to swallow, significant oral burns, or abdominal pain after unintentional ingestion. Children and adults who are asymptomatic after inadvertent ingestion do not require endoscopy. The grade of mucosal injury at endoscopy is the strongest predictive factor for the occurrence of systemic and GI complications and mortality. The absence of visible oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the presence of esophageal burns.
    F) CORTICOSTEROIDS
    1) The use of corticosteroids to prevent stricture formation is controversial. Corticosteroids should not be used in patients with grade I or grade III injury, as there is no evidence that it is effective. Evidence for grade II burns is conflicting, and the risk of perforation and infection is increased with steroid use.
    G) STRICTURE
    1) A barium swallow or repeat endoscopy should be performed several weeks after ingestion in any patient with grade II or III burns or with difficulty swallowing to evaluate for stricture formation. Recurrent dilation may be required. Some authors advocate early stent placement in these patients to prevent stricture formation.
    H) SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
    1) Immediate surgical consultation should be obtained on any patient with grade III or severe grade II burns on endoscopy, significant abdominal pain, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, coagulopathy, or a history of large ingestion. Early laparotomy can identify tissue necrosis and impending or unrecognized perforation, early resection and repair in these patients is associated with improved outcome.
    I) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Patients with alkaline corrosive ingestion should be sent to a health care facility for evaluation. Patients who remain asymptomatic over 4 to 6 hours of observation, and those with endoscopic evaluation that demonstrates no burns or only minor grade I burns and who can tolerate oral intake can be discharged home.
    2) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Symptomatic patients, and those with endoscopically demonstrated grade II or higher burns should be admitted. Patients with respiratory distress, grade III burns, acidosis, hemodynamic instability, gastrointestinal bleeding, or large ingestions should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    J) PITFALLS
    1) The absence of oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the possibility of significant esophageal burns.
    2) Patients may have severe tissue necrosis and impending perforation requiring early surgical intervention without having severe hypotension, rigid abdomen, or radiographic evidence of intraperitoneal air.
    3) Patients with any evidence of upper airway involvement require early airway management before airway edema progresses.
    4) The extent of eye injury (degree of corneal opacification and perilimbal whitening) may not be apparent for 48 to 72 hours after the burn. All patients with corrosive eye injury should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist.
    K) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    1) Acid ingestion, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or perforated viscus.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Administer oxygen as necessary. Monitor for respiratory distress.
    B) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Manage airway aggressively in patients with significant respiratory distress, stridor or any evidence of upper airway edema. Monitor for hypoxia or respiratory distress.
    C) BRONCHOSPASM
    1) Treat with oxygen, inhaled beta agonists and consider systemic corticosteroids.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Exposed eyes should be irrigated with copious amounts of 0.9% saline for at least 30 minutes, until pH is neutral and the cul de sacs are free of particulate material.
    2) An eye examination should always be performed, including slit lamp examination. Ophthalmologic consultation should be obtained. Antibiotics and mydriatics may be indicated.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION
    a) Remove contaminated clothes and any particulate matter adherent to skin. Irrigate exposed skin with copious amounts of water for at least 15 minutes or longer, depending on concentration, amount and duration of exposure to the chemical. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persist.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) LIQUID CORROSIVES - With highly concentrated liquids (30% sodium hydroxide) esophageal burns may occur in up to 100% of patients, even after accidental ingestion.
    B) Serious burns are less likely if the pH is less than 11.5. Injury is greater with large exposures and high concentrations.
    C) More recent series of caustic ingestions (mixed liquid and solid) in children report incidences of significant esophageal burns from 5% to 35%. Adults with deliberate ingestions are more likely to develop significant esophageal burns (30% to 80%).
    D) LOW PHOSPHATE DETERGENTS and electric dishwasher soaps may result in oral and esophageal burns.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Used as drain openers, household cleaners (oven, bathroom), hair relaxers, dishwasher soap, and in automobile air bags. In industry used as cleaners, in cement, and as chemical precursors.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Alkaline corrosives cause liquefaction necrosis. They saponify the fats in the cell membrane, destroying the cell and allowing deep penetration into mucosal tissue. In gastrointestinal tissue an initial inflammatory phase may be followed by tissue necrosis (sometimes resulting in perforation), then granulation and finally stricture formation.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Exposure is common. Serious effects are rare in the developed world (generally only seen in adults with deliberate ingestion), largely because mostly low concentration corrosives are present in products available in the home. Serious effects are more common in developing countries.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE ORAL TOXICITY: Patients with mild ingestions may only develop irritation or grade I (superficial hyperemia and edema) burns of the oropharynx, esophagus or stomach; acute or chronic complications are unlikely. Patients with moderate toxicity may develop grade II burns (superficial blisters, erosions and ulcerations) are at risk for subsequent stricture formation, particularly esophageal. Some patients (particularly young children) may develop upper airway edema.
    a) Alkaline corrosive ingestion may produce burns to the oropharynx, upper airway, esophagus and occasionally stomach. Spontaneous vomiting may occur. The absence of visible oral burns does NOT reliably exclude the presence of esophageal burns. The presence of stridor, vomiting, drooling, and abdominal pain are associated with serious esophageal injury in most cases.
    b) PREDICTIVE: The grade of mucosal injury at endoscopy is the strongest predictive factor for the occurrence of systemic and GI complications and mortality.
    2) SEVERE ORAL TOXICITY: May develop deep burns and necrosis of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Complications often include perforation (esophageal, gastric, rarely duodenal), fistula formation (tracheoesophageal, aortoesophageal), and gastrointestinal bleeding. Hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea and, rarely, fever may develop. Stricture formation (esophageal, less often oral or gastric) is likely to develop long term. Esophageal carcinoma is another long term complication. Upper airway edema is common and often life threatening. Severe toxicity is generally limited to deliberate ingestions in adults in the US, because alkaline products available in the home are generally of low concentration.
    3) INHALATION EXPOSURE: Mild exposure may cause cough and bronchospasm. Severe inhalation may cause upper airway edema and burns, stridor, and rarely acute lung injury.
    4) OCULAR EXPOSURE: Ocular exposure can produce severe conjunctival irritation and chemosis, corneal epithelial defects, limbal ischemia, permanent visual loss and in severe cases perforation.
    5) DERMAL EXPOSURE: Mild exposure causes irritation and partial thickness burns. Metabolic acidosis may develop in patients with severe burns or shock. Prolonged exposure or high concentration products can cause full thickness burns.

Vital Signs

    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) SHOCK: Hypotension and tachycardia are not common acutely but may develop in patients with severe gastrointestinal bleeding or extensive gastrointestinal necrosis after corrosive ingestion (Palmer et al, 2007; Hawkins et al, 1980; McCabe et al, 1969; Singh et al, 1976; Sarfati et al, 1987).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) CONJUNCTIVAL INJURY: Conjunctival inflammation and erythema are common, with accompanying stinging, burning and pain (Kersjes et al, 1987; Morgan, 1987; Mauger, 1988).
    a) In more severe cases chemosis, conjunctival epithelial defects or limbal ischemia may develop (Morgan, 1987).
    2) CORNEAL INJURY: Alkaline hydrolysis of matrix proteins and an inflammatory response produce corneal injury (Feng et al, 2004). Corneal injury may range from diffuse keratopathy to severe epithelial loss (Testud et al, 2002; Morgan, 1987; Mauger, 1988; O'Grady, 1989; Sawhney & Kaushish, 1989).
    a) Severity of corneal injury is dependent on the concentration of the alkali, the duration of exposure, and the pH of the solution. With a solution containing sodium as the principal cation, a pH greater than 11.5 is associated with a sharper increase in severity of injury to the corneal stroma (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    b) Ammonium hydroxide penetrates the cornea the fastest due to its fat solubility; it causes the deepest injury, with edema and wrinkling of the posterior corneal surface and damage to the iris and possibly cataract. Calcium hydroxide may cause superficial opacification of the cornea, and sodium hydroxide may commonly induce pearly opacification of deeper layers of the stroma (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    c) In severe cases the cornea may be overgrown by conjunctival epithelium, permanent corneal opacification may develop or corneal perforation and blindness may ensue (Mattax & Mcculley, 1988; Sawhney & Kaushish, 1989; Saini & Sharma, 1993).
    3) LIDS: Eyelid burns may be present (Morgan, 1987). Ectropion of the eyelids may develop after severe burns (Sawhney & Kaushish, 1989).
    4) CATARACT: The most severe alkali burns may result in cataract formation, particularly by rapidly penetrating ammonia. When cataracts occur and impair vision, often irreversible damage has occurred to the rest of the eye (Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    5) GRADING OF ACUTE EFFECTS
    a) GRADE 1 INJURY: Corneal epithelium damage, no conjunctival ischemia; good prognosis (Roper-Hall, 1965; Saini & Sharma, 1993).
    b) GRADE 2 INJURY: Hazy cornea; visible iris details, ischemia less than 1/3 of limbus; good prognosis (Roper-Hall, 1965; Saini & Sharma, 1993).
    c) GRADE 3 INJURY: Total epithelial loss, stromal haze, obscured iris details, ischemia 1/2 to 1/3 limbus; guarded prognosis (Roper-Hall, 1965; Saini & Sharma, 1993).
    d) GRADE 4 INJURY: Opaque cornea, ischemia more than 1/2 limbus; poor prognosis (Roper-Hall, 1965; Saini & Sharma, 1993).
    6) EARLY REGENERATIVE PHASE (1 TO 3 WEEKS): There is usually a decrease in both conjunctival and corneal epithelial defects as the epithelia regenerates. Corneal opacity and iritis lessen or disappear, depending on their severity (Hughes, 1946).
    a) Negative effects include possible replacement of ciliary and iris tissue with granulation tissue (producing fibrosis) (Pfister et al, 1971), and corneal ulceration.
    7) LATE REGENERATIVE AND/OR SEQUELAE: Recurrent corneal ulceration, the extent of which may be determined by the interplay of collagen synthesis versus collagenolytic activity, may occur (Hughes, 1946). The cornea may be overgrown by conjunctival invasion or become permanently opacified (Mattax & Mcculley, 1988). Cataracts or glaucoma may develop (Hughes, 1946).
    a) The ability to produce the water and/or mucin portion of the tear film may be affected (Lemp, 1974).
    b) In severe cases visual loss may be permanent (McLaughlin, 1946; Sawhney & Kaushish, 1989). Corneal perforation may rarely develop (Sawhney & Kaushish, 1989).
    8) AUTOMOTIVE AIR BAG SYSTEMS: Most air bag injuries are minor. More than 5% of injuries are alkaline burns, however, and typically involve the upper extremities, head and neck. Most burns to the skin are superficial, requiring minimal care (Hallock, 1997).
    9) CASE REPORTS
    a) A 2-year-old boy developed bilateral photophobia, tearing, redness, and a tear pH of 8.5 to 9 approximately 4 hours following an accident in which he was thrown from the rear seat, landing face up under the dashboard in an automobile with a driver's air bag that burst (Ingraham et al, 1991).
    b) A 22-year-old woman developed chemical conjunctivitis after being exposed to the white powder in her airbag when it deployed during a motor vehicle accident (Swanson-Biearman et al, 1991a). Another woman experienced alkali keratitis as a result of activation of an automobile air bag, with diffuse corneal opacification in one eye. Following aggressive medical management, her eye slowly re-epithelialized over 5 weeks (White et al, 1995).
    c) Sodium hydroxide released from automotive air bags has been suspected as a cause of the ocular injuries (Ingraham et al, 1991) Swanson-Bierman et al, 1993).
    10) LIME BURNS: In a series of 27 patients with lime (calcium hydroxide) induced eye injury the following frequency of ocular findings were reported on admission (Rozenbaum et al, 1991) -
    Conjunctival congestion100%
    Corneal erosion92.6%
    Corneal haze85.2%
    Conjunctival erosion59.3%
    Lime remnants29.6%
    Chemosis22.2%

    a) SEQUELAE: Permanent sequelae were reported in 2 of 27 patients; one patient had a corneal scar and permanently decreased visual acuity, and one patient had dry eye syndrome. Both patients were presumed to have had no immediate irrigation, since lime fragments were found imbedded in the conjunctiva (Rozenbaum et al, 1991).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) BURNS: Patients may present with burns to the lips, tongue, oral mucosa or hypopharynx.
    a) The presence or absence of burns in the mouth does not indicate burns of the esophagus. Severe esophageal burns have been reported in cases where burns of the mouth or oropharynx were not seen (Uhde, 1946; Alford & Harris, 1959; Viscomi et al, 1961; Yarington et al, 1964; Feldman et al, 1973; Gaudreault et al, 1983; Previtera et al, 1990; Rauch, 2000). Of 389 pediatric patients who were hospitalized following ingestion of corrosive substances but did not have oral cavity burns, endoscopy revealed that 240 of the patients (61%) had esophageal lesions (Dogan et al, 2006).
    b) CASE SERIES: In a series of 95 patients with suspected or obvious corrosive burns, 91 had involvement of the oral mucosa, 39 of the hypopharynx or esophagus, and 31 of the epiglottis, epiglottic folds, or larynx (Sellars & Spence, 1987).
    c) Sign and symptoms associated with oral burns include pain, crying, sialorrhea, lip swelling and dysphagia (Vergauwen et al, 1991; Rauch, 2000).
    2) STRICTURES: Oral and hypopharyngeal strictures may develop as a complication of severe burns, but are less commonly reported than esophageal strictures (Tran Ba Huy & Celerier, 1988; Rubin et al, 1989; Takato et al, 1989).
    3) Severe scarring of the oral cavity, resulting in perioral contracture, was reported in 3 pediatric patients following ingestion of corrosive alkaline substances (Ryan et al, 2006).
    4) TONGUE SWELLING: An 80-year-old woman experienced tongue swelling minutes after tasting a product thought to be sugar but was, in fact, a sodium hydroxide drain cleaner. She spit out the particles and did not swallow any of the material after experiencing immediate burning in her mouth. She had no respiratory difficulties but was experiencing difficulty with speech and drooling secondary to tongue edema. The patient recovered following irrigation of the mouth and administration of an oral antihistamine and corticosteroid (Yanturali et al, 2004).
    5) SALIVARY DUCT STRICTURE: A 35-year-old man presented with peri-stomal tightness and difficulty in opening his mouth approximately 2 months after sustaining burns in his mouth following unintentional ingestion of a corrosive alkaline solution that he did not swallow. Physical examination indicated bilateral swelling of his submandibular glands and induration and scarring on the floor of his mouth. An ultra-sonographic examination revealed obstruction of his salivary duct due to scarring around the ductal orifice and the terminal part of the submandibular salivary ducts. The patient recovered following surgical intervention involving excision of the submandibular salivary glands and lining restoration with a free radial forearm flap (Varkey et al, 2006).
    6) CASE REPORT: A 16-month-old boy ingested an unknown amount of a substance containing sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate and presented with severe stridor, burnt lips and necrosis of the epithelium of the inside of his mouth and tongue. Burns were also noted suprapubicallly and on the dorsum of his penis due to splashes from the corrosive substance. Endoscopy revealed erythema and ulceration from the mouth to the upper part of the duodenum. Laryngoscopy performed 2 days after presentation demonstrated white, charred, and stiff epiglottis; however, approximately two-thirds of the patient's vocal cords were spared anteriorly. A repeat laryngoscopy, performed 1 week later, revealed denuded epiglottic cartilage as well as a total loss of his vocal cords. The patient continued to be managed with supportive care, including performance of a tracheostomy for ventilatory support, sedation, analgesia, and parenteral nutrition, until gastric feeding could be established (Kua et al, 2015).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hypotension and tachycardia are not common acutely but may develop in patients with severe gastrointestinal bleeding or extensive gastrointestinal necrosis after corrosive ingestion (Palmer et al, 2007; Hawkins et al, 1980; McCabe et al, 1969; Singh et al, 1976; Sarfati et al, 1987).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) INJURY OF UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Burns and edema of the epiglottis and larynx may develop after caustic ingestion and may cause severe respiratory distress, particularly in children. Massive necrosis of the laryngeal and pharyngeal wall may necessitate tracheostomy (Jaillard et al, 2002).
    b) INCIDENCE: In a series of 95 patients with suspected or obvious corrosive burns, 31 (33%) had involvement of the epiglottis, epiglottic folds, or larynx (Sellars & Spence, 1987).
    1) In a retrospective study of 31 children with corrosive ingestion (32 episodes), two children (6%) had lower pharyngeal, epiglottic and subglottic edema, and both required intubation. The presence of stridor, wheeze, tachypnea, and the need for supplemental oxygen were all associated with the need for intubation (Turner & Robinson, 2005).
    2) In a series of 51 children with caustic ingestion, 7 (14%) patients had laryngeal burns and respiratory distress, 5 of whom required immediate intubation (Vergauwen et al, 1991).
    3) Of 33 children admitted after accidental caustic ingestion, 14 (42%) had laryngeal lesions on endoscopy and some degree of respiratory distress (Moulin et al, 1985). The three children in this group who required immediate intubation for airway obstruction were all under 1 year old.
    4) Of 134 children with alkaline ingestion in another series, 10 (7%) had laryngeal or epiglottic edema (Clausen et al, 1994).
    5) In another series of 152 children with signs or symptoms after caustic ingestion, 11 (7%) had laryngeal edema on endoscopy (Clausen et al, 1994).
    6) LAUNDRY DETERGENTS: Accidental ingestion of a sodium carbonate/sodium silicate based nonphosphate laundry detergent produced respiratory distress in 5 of 6 children, aged 1 to 2 years, with an onset between 1 and 2 hours.
    a) All but one of the symptomatic children had edema of the upper respiratory tract, such as the epiglottis and vocal cords, which resulted in significant airway compromise; symptoms included stridor, retractions, and coughing (Einhorn et al, 1989).
    b) Two additional children with a history of inhalation and/or ingestion of laundry detergent developed a more rapid onset (immediately, and one hour) of symptoms, which included hoarseness, retractions, fever, tachypnea, and respiratory distress.
    c) All children improved within 12 hours of admission, were extubated within 48 hours, and asymptomatic at 72 hours (Einhorn et al, 1989).
    c) Tracheostomy may be required in severe cases (Oakes et al, 1982; Schild, 1985; Estrera et al, 1986; Previtera et al, 1990).
    d) DELAYED-ONSET of upper airway compromise, in the absence of significant esophageal injury, has been reported in an infant following ingestion of a hair relaxer cream. On initial emergency department (ED) examination no respiratory problems were noted and the infant was sent home.
    1) Approximately 4 hours after the infant was initially found with the cream smeared around his face he was brought back to the ED with inspiratory stridor with crying and a croupy cough. New buccal and pharyngeal mucosal erythema and an ulcer were noted. Endoscopy showed erythema of the upper esophageal sphincter. After 24 hours of dexamethasone therapy, the infant was discharged (Babl et al, 2001).
    B) BURN OF RESPIRATORY TRACT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pulmonary burns may occur following inhalation of vaporized caustics. Destruction or damage may occur to alveoli with subsequent pulmonary edema and pneumonitis.
    b) CASE REPORT: Hypoxia, stridor, upper airway burns and pulmonary infiltrates developed in a 20-year-old man who sustained an inhalation injury from calcium hydroxide and heat produced when he added crystals of calcium oxide to an acid solution of industrial waste (Bonatucci et al, 1984).
    1) Chest radiograph and xenon lung scans did not demonstrate pulmonary injury until 4 days after the event despite persistent hypoxemia.
    c) Pulmonary infiltrates have been reported in a few patients after ingestion of caustics (Burrington, 1975; Symbas et al, 1983).
    d) Recurrent atelectases and pneumonia developed in two adults who sustained bronchial burns after ingesting concentrated sodium hydroxide (Meredith et al, 1988).
    C) DISORDER OF RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) PERSISTENT PULMONARY DISEASE: Obstructive airway disease developed in a 63-year-old man with chronic occupational exposure to sodium hydroxide mist (Bentur & Rubin, 1991). It was postulated that the alkaline mist induced a bronchial inflammatory reaction and fibrous tissue formation leading to irreversible obstructive airway disease (Rubin et al, 1992).
    b) Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (exertional dyspnea, wheezing, productive cough, reduced FEV1, positive methacholine challenge test) developed in 3 men who were exposed at the scene of an accident involving a truck carrying sodium hydroxide, silicon tetrachloride, and trichlorosilane (Promisloff et al, 1990).
    c) CASE REPORT: An 88-year-old non-smoking woman without a prior history of lung disease was exposed to an oven cleaner containing sodium hydroxide with isobutane propellant sprayed into a heated oven of 200 degrees Fahrenheit, and developed bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP). Clinical effects including cough, fever, and flu-like symptoms developed within minutes of exposure. Three days after exposure she developed worsening dyspnea and was treated with inhaled beta agonists, steroids and antibiotics and was discharged to home.
    1) Ten days later she was readmitted for worsening dyspnea, fatigue and confusion with hypoxia and crackles found on lung exam. Chest CT revealed extensive bilateral infiltrates with small bilateral pleural effusions. Treatment included another course of antibiotics and steroids and she gradually improved. The authors postulated that spraying the product in a heated oven increased vaporization of sodium hydroxide, thus increasing the patient's exposure (Audi et al, 2006).
    D) STENOSIS OF TRACHEA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe tracheal stricture developed in a 2-year-old girl who ingested an oven cleaner paste (Leape et al, 1972). Her clinical course was complicated by esophageal stricture which required repeated dilation and then perforated, causing mediastinal abscess formation.
    E) TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tracheoesophageal fistulae have been reported as delayed sequelae of alkaline corrosive ingestion (Borja et al, 1969; McCabe et al, 1969; Singh et al, 1976; Sarfati et al, 1987).
    b) Tracheobronchial injuries following a severe caustic alkali ingestion are considered a poor prognostic factor. In a case of ingestion of 200 mL of potassium hydroxide, a 26-year-old man developed tracheobronchial involvement caused by necrotic extension from his burned esophagus. Lesions affected the posterior wall of the trachea and both main bronchi. Operation through a right thoracotomy was necessary for esophagectomy, with a long left bronchial tube placed distally in the left main bronchus to prevent air leak. In this case, healing of the tracheobronchial perforation occurred (Jaillard et al, 2002).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ULCER OF ESOPHAGUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) The esophagus is the most common site of gastrointestinal burns after alkaline corrosive ingestion (Poley et al, 2004; Kirsh & Ritter, 1976; Moazam et al, 1987; Chen et al, 1988). Risk of stricture formation may be clinically determined by the initial depth of injury noted on endoscopic visualization or of the esophagus (Rao & Hoffman, 1998).
    1) CHILDREN: The incidence of significant esophageal burns in most series of children with caustic ingestion ranges from 5% to 35% (Crain et al, 1984; Gorman et al, 1992; Previtera et al, 1990; Vergauwen et al, 1991; Nuutinen et al, 1994). Asymptomatic children with unintentional caustic ingestions generally have not been found to have significant lesions on endoscopy (Rao & Hoffman, 1998).
    2) ADULTS: The incidence of significant esophageal burns is higher in most series with a preponderance of adults, ranging from 30% to 79%, presumably related to the larger quantities ingested in patients with suicidal intent (Poley et al, 2004; Hawkins et al, 1980; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989; Christesen, 1994).
    3) LIQUID VS SOLID: Diffuse circumferential esophageal burns are more common in patients ingesting liquid forms of concentrated alkaline corrosives; granular forms tend to produce more oral burns and esophageal burns that are in patches or streaks (Estrera et al, 1986). Children who lick thick "hair relaxer" pastes most often develop only oral burns (Mrvos & Krenzelok, 1997), although second degree esophageal burns have occasionally been reported (Rauch, 2000).
    B) BURN OF GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Gastric burns may also occur after alkaline corrosive ingestion (Previtera et al, 1990; Davis et al, 1972; Allen et al, 1970; Warren et al, 1984; Lowe et al, 1979; Carroll et al, 1994) (Bernardino & Lawson, 1977) (Welsh & Welsh, 1978).
    1) INCIDENCE: It is generally less common than esophageal injury in most series, ranging form 6% to 17%(Dogan et al, 2006; Previtera et al, 1990; Vergauwen et al, 1991).
    a) ADULTS: Gastric burns appear to be more common in case series with a preponderance of adults (most with deliberate ingestions), occurring in from 51% to 87% of patients in some series (Arevalo-Silva et al, 2006; Poley et al, 2004; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989).
    b) Gastric injuries may also be more common in patients ingesting liquid alkaline corrosives or solids which have been place in capsules (Bernardino & Lawson, 1977) (Welsh & Welsh, 1978; Lowe et al, 1979; Meredith et al, 1988; Carroll et al, 1994).
    c) Gastric pH above 7.8 was associated with more severe esophageal and gastric burns in one series (Estrera et al, 1986).
    d) In a series of 9 patients who swallowed more than 100 mL of a strong alkali, 4 had third degree burns and 2 developed esophagorespiratory fistulas and died in the hospital (Makela et al, 1998).
    b) CAUSTIC INJURY SCALES
    1) Several scales for grading caustic injury exist. The likelihood of complications such as strictures, obstruction, bleeding and perforation are related to the severity of the initial burn.
    a) GRADING SCALES
    1) GRADE 0: Normal examination
    2) GRADE 1: Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa; strictures unlikely
    3) GRADE 2A: Friability, hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, whitish membranes, exudates and superficial ulcerations; strictures unlikely
    4) GRADE 2B: Grade 2A plus deep discreet or circumferential ulceration; strictures may develop.
    5) GRADE 3A: Multiple ulcerations and small scattered areas of necrosis; strictures common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
    6) GRADE 3B: Extensive necrosis through visceral wall; strictures common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
    7) (Zargar et al, 1991a)
    1) According to a retrospective chart review of 273 patients, admitted to a Taiwanese hospital from 1999 to 2006 for caustic ingestion, the Zargar grading classification of mucosal injury was a strong and useful predictor in determining patient outcome. In this study, patients with grade 3B mucosal injuries were at an increased risk for prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio (OR) 2.44; 95%CI: 1.25 to 4.80; p<0.05), ICU admission (OR 10.82; 95%CI: 2.05 to 200.39; p<0.05), and gastrointestinal (OR 4:07; 95%CI: 1.81 to 9.69; p<0.05) and systemic complications (OR 4.15; 95% CI: 1.55 to 13.29; p<0.05) as compared with patients who had grade 3A mucosal injuries (Cheng et al, 2008).
    2) Kamijo et al (2001) suggested classifying lesions of alkaline esophagitis in terms of depth of injury: Grade Ia or Ib are lesions confined to the mucosa or submucosa; Grade IIa or IIb are lesions involving the muscularis propria or adventitia, which may be associated with a higher probability of stricture or perforation. Grade IIa lesions with circumferential involvement of the muscularis propria are most likely to result in stricture formation (Kamijo et al, 2001).
    3) The severity of burns found on endoscopy is a better predictor of complications, such as stricture formation, systemic complications or death, than is the type of substance ingested (Poley et al, 2004).
    c) OTHER
    1) CAPSULES: Ingestion of lye enclosed in gelatin capsules causes characteristic lesions on the gastric greater curve, presumably due to a gravitational effect and upright position after ingestion.
    a) Concurrent esophageal injury can occur in these cases due to lye adherent to the capsule exterior, dissolution of the capsule in the esophagus, or gastric reflux of alkaline solution after dissolution (Lowe et al, 1979; Gill et al, 1986).
    C) BURN OF DUODENUM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Intestinal burns, mostly duodenal, have been reported (Allen et al, 1970; Cello et al, 1980), but are much less frequent, occurring in about 2% to 6% of patients with caustic (acids, basic, acid/basic) ingestions (Poley et al, 2004; Previtera et al, 1990) and in 20% of alkaline ingestion cases in another series (Sugawa & Lucas, 1989).
    b) Severe duodenal injury may be more common with suicidal ingestions (Allen et al, 1970; Cello et al, 1980).
    c) A 38-year-old man who had previously undergone vagotomy and antrectomy with gastroduodenostomy reconstruction developed necrosis of the small and large intestines with perforations to the level of the sigmoid colon after swallowing lye (Sperling & Wheeler, 1974).
    d) Following the ingestion of 200 mL of potassium hydroxide, a 26-year-old man developed severe injuries to the gastrointestinal tract necessitating extensive resection of necrotic organs (total gastrectomy, cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, and cholecystectomy). All layers of the esophagus were found to be necrotic, including the periesophageal tissues (Jaillard et al, 2002).
    e) Duodenal ulcers have been reported after ingestion of Clinitest tablets (Warren et al, 1984).
    f) A 30-year-old man developed necrosis of the duodenum and transverse colon after ingesting liquid drain cleaner (Guth et al, 1994).
    D) ULCERATIVE STOMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Multiple studies have demonstrated that the absence of oral lesions can not be reliably used to exclude the possibility of significant esophageal or gastric burns (Dogan et al, 2006; Muhlendahl et al, 1978; Cello et al, 1980; Crain et al, 1984; Dabadie et al, 1989; Previtera et al, 1990; Gorman et al, 1992; Nuutinen et al, 1994).
    E) GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) OVERDOSE EFFECTS
    1) SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS commonly encountered after caustic ingestion include drooling, dysphagia, pain, vomiting, abdominal pain and tenderness, cough, and stridor (Cello et al, 1980; Crain et al, 1984; Vergauwen et al, 1991; Previtera et al, 1990; Gorman et al, 1992; Keh et al, 2006).
    2) Several studies have evaluated the ability of signs and symptoms to reliably predict the presence of significant esophageal burns.
    a) In a retrospective study of 79 patients with caustic ingestions all 7 patients with second or third degree burns on endoscopy had 2 or more signs or symptoms (vomiting, drooling or stridor) (Crain et al, 1984).
    b) In a retrospective study of 51 children with caustic ingestion, none of the 10 patients without signs or symptoms (pain, sialorrhea, vomiting, respiratory distress, dysphagia, coughing) had a grade 2 or 3 lesion on endoscopy (Verauwen et al, 1991).
    1) One out of 10 patients with spontaneous vomiting had second or third degree gastric burns compared with 5 out of 9 patients in whom vomiting was induced.
    c) In a prospective study of 336 patients with alkaline corrosive ingestion, 88 patients underwent endoscopy (Gorman et al, 1992). Reports of the findings were available in 63 cases, 18 of these had second or third degree burns.
    1) Signs and symptoms (refusal to swallow, nausea, vomiting, drooling, cough, abdominal pain, dysphagia, stridor, oral burns) were generally more common in patients with significant burns, and no patient with second of third degree burns after unintentional ingestion was asymptomatic. No group of signs or symptoms could reliably predict the presence of significant burns.
    d) In a retrospective study of 378 children with caustic ingestion all of whom underwent endoscopy, the absence of signs and symptoms (vomiting, dysphagia, excessive salivation, abdominal pain, refusal to drink, oropharyngeal burn) did not reliably exclude significant esophageal burns (Gaudreault et al, 1983).
    1) Ten of 70 asymptomatic patients (12%) had second degree burns, one of whom developed stricture.
    e) In a series of 17 adults with caustic ingestion, one patient without symptoms (glossopharyngeal pain, dysphagia, abdominal or epigastric pain, hematemesis) had moderate panesophagitis and minimal gastritis on endoscopy (Cello et al, 1980).
    f) In a retrospective study of 98 children with caustic (75 alkali, 23 acid) ingestion, the combined symptoms of dysphagia, vomiting and refusal to drink had a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 57% in predicting second degree or greater esophageal burns (Nuutinen et al, 1994).
    1) Seven children developed esophageal scars and one developed stricture. These were predicted with 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity by the combined symptoms of prolonged drooling and dysphagia (Nuutinen et al, 1994).
    g) Although oral cavity burns were not seen in 389 patients, endoscopy revealed esophageal lesions in 240 (61%) patients (Dogan et al, 2006).
    F) STRICTURE OF ESOPHAGUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Esophageal strictures are common sequelae of caustic burns (Afzal et al, 2002; Chen et al, 1988) (Edmondson, 1987) (Patrick et al, 1986; Mackenzie, 1982; Leape et al, 1972; Leape et al, 1971). Risk of stricture formation may be clinically determined by the initial depth of injury noted on endoscopic visualization of the esophagus (Rao & Hoffman, 1998). Strictures are more likely to develop after second or third degree or circumferential burns (Zargar et al, 1991) (Meredith et al, 1988; Estrera et al, 1986). Grade III burns result in deep ulcers and necrosis into the periesophageal tissues, which almost invariably progress to stricture formation with a high risk of perforation (Rao & Hoffman, 1998).
    b) INCIDENCE: The incidence of strictures varies widely, from 1% to 56% in several large series (Hardin, 1956; Borja et al, 1969; Moazam et al, 1987; Symbas et al, 1983; Waldron & Fitzgerald, 1987; Ferguson et al, 1989; Sellars & Spence, 1987; Clausen et al, 1994; Nuutinen et al, 1994; Poley et al, 2004).
    1) Higher incidences of strictures are more common in older studies (Hardin, 1956), and may reflect the more concentrated forms of alkaline corrosives used in household products at the time.
    c) According to a retrospective review of cases, from 1957 to 1994 and involving 215 patients who ingested commercial sodium hydroxide, esophageal lesions occurred in 88.4% of patients, with stenosis occurring in 73% of patients. The incidence and severity of the stenosis directly correlated with the amount of sodium hydroxide ingested (Mamede & De Mello Filho, 2002).
    d) PREDICTIVE: One study of children and adults found stridor to be 100% specific for marked esophageal injury on endoscopy (Gorman et al, 1992). Another prospective study of 79 children with caustic ingestion found a combination of two or more signs of vomiting, drooling, or stridor was predictive of esophageal injury (Crain et al, 1995).
    e) CLINITEST: Strictures developing after ingestion of Clinitest tablets tend to form at the level of the carina and aortic arch (Burrington, 1975; Genieser & Becker, 1969).
    f) INCREASED OROCECAL TRANSIT TIME: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the orocecal transit time in patients who are in the chronic phase of a corrosive injury, The study involved 30 patients who underwent successful endoscopy for esophageal strictures induced by ingestion of caustic agents and 30 subjects in the control group with normal endoscopic findings and no history of corrosive ingestion. The orocecal transit time was measured via lactulose hydrogen breath test. The results of the test showed that the orocecal transit time was significantly prolonged in the study group as compared to the control group (135.4 +/-15.8 min vs 90.6 +/-10.36 min; p <0.05) and that, within the study group, there was significant delay in orocecal transit time in patients with strictures involving the lower one third of the esophagus as compared to those patients with strictures involving the upper or mid third of the esophagus (170.6 +/-11.9 min vs 94.5 +/-11.2 min; p <0.001) (Rana et al, 2008).
    g) CASE REPORT: An 11-month-old boy was brought to the emergency department (ED) approximately 1 hour after a suspected ingestion of a callous remover containing potassium hydroxide (concentration unknown). Other than white plaque at the base of his tongue, his physical examination was normal. An endoscopy was not performed. Following a 1-hour observation period, he was discharged home. Eighteen days later, he returned to the ED due to intolerance of liquids for 24 hours and several days of gagging and vomiting with intake of solid foods. An esophagram revealed severe esophageal stricture, involving almost the entire length of the esophagus. Immediate gastrostomy tube placement was performed for enteral access. Over the next several months, several esophageal dilatations were performed with limited success. In addition, gastric and esophageal perforations occurred requiring gastric repair and esophageal stent placement. However, he remained dependent on gastrostomy tube feedings, would likely require periodic serial dilatations and possible esophageal replacement (Plumb et al, 2015).
    G) GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Severe gastrointestinal bleeding may develop in patients with significant burns (Symbas et al, 1983) (Zargar et al, 1991) (Schild, 1985; Welsh & Welsh, 1978; Oakes et al, 1982; Hawkins et al, 1980; Guth et al, 1994).
    H) RUPTURE OF ESOPHAGUS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Gastric or esophageal perforation is a life threatening complication that may develop in patients with severe burns (Oakes et al, 1982) (Edmondson, 1987) (Allen et al, 1970; Welsh & Welsh, 1978; Schild, 1985) (Alford & Harris, 1958) (Hawkins et al, 1980; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989) (Zargar et al, 1991).
    1) Perforation may occur as a complication of attempts to dilate esophageal strictures (Feldman et al, 1973; Simpson et al, 1974; Rubin et al, 1989; Dogan et al, 2006).
    I) TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Tracheoesophageal and aortoesophageal fistulae may develop as delayed sequelae of severe burns (Makela et al, 1998; Borja et al, 1969; Sarfati et al, 1987; McCabe et al, 1969; Singh et al, 1976; Rabinovitz et al, 1990).
    b) Fistulae may not develop until 1 to 4 weeks after the ingestion; aortic fistulae may result in massive hemorrhage (Singh et al, 1976; McCabe et al, 1969; Rabinovitz et al, 1990).
    c) The delay between exposure and development of esophagorespiratory fistulas are the most important predictors of death. Anastomotic strictures after reconstruction may require repeated esophageal dilatations (Makela et al, 1998).
    J) PYLORIC STENOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pyloric stenosis and gastric outlet obstruction may develop in patients with severe gastric burns (Wright & Hennessey, 1972) (Hawkins et al, 1980; Oakes et al, 1982) (Term et al, 1987).
    K) DIVERTICULUM
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Esophageal diverticula have been reported as an unusual delayed complication of alkaline corrosive ingestion in two patients (Chen et al, 1988).
    L) ULCERATIVE PROCTOCOLITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Following the use of enemas containing caustic alkalies, ulcerative proctocolitis has been reported. da Fonsecaea et al (1998) reported 2 cases of acute proctocolitis resulting from rectal application of caustic products, ammonia solution enema and lye enema, respectively. Sigmoidoscopy and biopsy revealed erythematous colon with ulcerations (da Fonseca et al, 1998).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 5-year-old girl presented with a 2-day history of pelvic pain and brownish vaginal discharge. Microscopic examination of the urine revealed the presence of erythrocytes and inflammatory cells and examination of the outer labia demonstrated severe reddening with brown appositions. A vaginoscopy done under general anesthesia showed the presence of an alkaline battery (size AAA). After removal of the battery, circular necrotic lesions of the vaginal wall were observed; however, there was no evidence of fistulas or other abnormalities. Following antibiotic therapy and insertion of a urinary catheter for 5 days, the patient's condition improved. The brownish vaginal discharge persisted for several weeks. A repeat vaginoscopy, performed 3 weeks post-presentation revealed coverage of the burns with a fibrinous layer, and a third vaginoscopy 3 months post-presentation demonstrated complete resolution. No long term issues were reported at one year follow-up (Semaan et al, 2015).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) A lactic acidosis may develop after severe alkali ingestion, due to severe tissue burns and shock (Okonek et al, 1981).
    b) CASE REPORT: Metabolic acidosis (pH 7.27, pCO2 38 mmHg) was reported in a 50-year-old man following ingestion of approximately 4 ounces of liquid drain opener containing 10% sodium hydroxide (Palmer et al, 2007).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dermal contact with alkaline corrosives may cause significant injury, ranging from mild pain and erythema to full thickness burns requiring grafting (Singer et al, 1992; Mozingo et al, 1988; Lorette & Wilkinson, 1988; Harper & Dickson, 1994) (Sawhney & Kaushih, 1989) (Winder, 1997) (Winek et al, 1999). Skin contact with strong alkalies (greater that pH 12.5) results in irritation, progressing to desquamation and cell necrosis. Once this occurs, the alkali is able to penetrate further and cause deep burns. Because of its ability to penetrate tissue and produce vascular thrombosis and necrosis, continuing alkali damage occurs (Winder, 1997). Scarring may result.
    b) The delay in the onset of pain after dermal contact with alkaline corrosives may delay decontamination and encourage the development of deeper burns (Lorette & Wilkinson, 1988).
    c) Complications may include cellulitis, contractures and recurrent skin breakdown (O'Donoghue et al, 1994) (Mozigo et al, 1988) (Singer et al, 1992).
    d) AUTOMOTIVE AIR BAG SYSTEMS: Four cases of dermal burns were associated with the white powdery residue (talc and sodium hydroxide) from air bags found in the driver compartment after a motor vehicle accident (Swanson-Biearman et al, 1991).
    e) HOUSEHOLD OVEN CLEANER: A 20-year-old woman developed a full-thickness alkaline burn that required skin grafting after she accidentally sprayed the right side of her face and neck with an aerosol oven cleaner. She removed the foam with a moist cloth but did not irrigate the exposed area (Lorette & Wilkinson, 1988).
    1) Four patients developed full thickness burns requiring grafting after accidental exposure to an aerosol oven cleaner which was 4.3% sodium hydroxide (Harper & Dickson, 1994).
    2) Two patients developed partial thickness burns after contact with the solution from oven cleaning pads (Vilogi et al, 1985).
    f) CEMENT: Severe burns and skin necrosis may result from prolonged contact with wet cement (Flowers, 1978; Hannuksela et al, 1976). The delay in onset of pain and prolonged contact from cement trapped in boots and clothing may contribute to the severity of the injury.
    g) ALKALINE BATTERIES: A case of accidental third-degree burns occurred in a 2-year-old boy after he sat in a seat where alkaline batteries had leaked. The chemical had penetrated through his pants resulting in full thickness burns on his rear right thigh, requiring skin grafting (Winek et al, 1999).
    h) HAIR RELAXERS: Hair relaxer cream was inadvertently smeared on the face of a 27-month-old girl and resulted in first-degree burns (Rauch, 2000).
    i) TETRAMETHYLAMMONIUM HYDROXIDE: A 39-year-old man was found dead approximately 1 hour following occupational dermal exposure to a pallet cleaning solution containing 35% of a 25% tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) solution. An autopsy revealed second degree burns on 12% of his skin. There were no other apparent complications that were attributed to his death. Because it is rare that burns on 12% of skin without complications would cause death, it is believed that TMAH may have caused ganglion blockage via dermal absorption, resulting in respiratory failure (Park et al, 2013).
    B) ALOPECIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Scarring ALOPECIA has been reported in black patients using hair relaxers or straighteners which are either sodium hydroxide-or ammonium thioglycollate-based. The hair loss occurred as soon as 2 weeks after a single application and up to 5 years after regular use (Nicholson et al, 1993).
    C) DERMATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Eight patients developed dermatitis (superficial burns with marked edema, erythema and severe pruritus) following contact with a complex amine used in the potash industry (Sagi et al, 1988). In three patients partial thickness burns developed 5 days later.

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA
    1) ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA has been reported in patients at the site of corrosive-induced strictures (Isolauri & Markkula, 1989; Appelqvist & Salmo, 1980; Benedict, 1941; Bigelow, 1953; Kinnman et al, 1968).
    a) INCIDENCE - A history of alkaline corrosive ingestion is found in 1 to 4% of patients treated for esophageal carcinoma (Isolauri & Markkula, 1989). Compared to age-matched nonexposed individuals, the risk of esophageal carcinomas was 1000 times greater in a series of 381 cases of lye corrosive injury (Kiviranta, 1950).
    b) TYPE - In a series of 15 cases of lye-induced esophageal carcinoma, all were squamous cell tumors. The site was the region of tracheal bifurcation in 11 of the 15 cases (Isolauri & Markkula, 1989).
    c) LATENCY - The mean latent time between lye corrosion and esophageal carcinoma was 41 years in one study; the later in life the lye was ingested, the earlier the carcinoma appeared (Appelqvist & Salmo, 1980). The range in another study of 15 cases was 22 to 81 years, with a mean of 58 years in men and 47 years in women (Isolauri & Markkula, 1989). A latency as short as 12 years has been reported (Kinnman et al, 1968).
    d) PROGNOSIS - One and 5-year survival rates in patients with resectable tumors were 50% and 20%, respectively, in a series of 10 cases. Five patients with nonresectable tumors had 1 and 5-year survival rates of 20% and 0%, respectively (Isolauri & Markkula, 1989).
    e) CASE REPORT - A 14-year-old boy developed an esophageal stricture within a few months after unintentionally ingesting caustic soda. He did well with periodic dilatation over the next 24 years. He then felt that his response to dilatation became poor, and developed anorexia and weight loss. Endoscopy of the esophagus revealed a papillary growth, with features of squamous cell carcinoma on biopsy and local spread to contiguous organs on CT. Despite treatment with chemotherapy and radiation, the patient died within months of diagnosis (Kochhar et al, 2006).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Obtain a complete blood count in symptomatic patients following an alkaline corrosive ingestion.
    B) In patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions), obtain renal function tests, serum electrolytes, INR, PTT, type and crossmatch for blood, and monitor urine output. Serum lactate and base deficit may also be useful in these patients.
    C) Monitor pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of upper airway edema or burns.
    D) Obtain an upright chest x-ray in patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions) to evaluate for pneumomediastinum or free air under the diaphragm. The absence of these findings DOES NOT rule out the possibility of necrosis or perforation of the esophagus or stomach. Obtain a chest radiograph in patients with pulmonary signs or symptoms.
    E) Several weeks after ingestion, barium contrast radiographs of the upper GI tract are useful in patients who sustained grade II or III burns, to evaluate for strictures.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) HEMATOLOGIC
    1) Obtain a complete blood count in patients with symptomatic alkaline corrosive ingestion.
    B) COAGULATION STUDIES
    1) In patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding, obtain renal function tests, PT or INR, PTT, and type and crossmatch for blood.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) OTHER
    1) Monitor urine output in patients with significant gastrointestinal burns, perforation, or bleeding.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) MONITORING
    a) Monitor pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of upper airway burns.
    2) ULTRASOUND
    a) Endoscopic ultrasound has been used to determine the depth of lesions in alkaline esophagitis, although there is much less experience with this technique than with endoscopy (Kamijo et al, 2001).
    b) ESOPHAGEAL SCINTIGRAPHY
    1) Esophageal scintigraphy has been used to assess esophageal transit and gastric-emptying following a caustic (ie, sodium hydroxide) ingestion. Transesophageal fistula was observed prior to any clinical suspicion or radiologic detection (Kaya et al, 2005).

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Obtain an upright chest x-ray in patients with significant signs and symptoms to evaluate for pneumomediastinum or free air under the diaphragm.
    2) The absence of these findings does not rule out the possibility of necrosis or perforation of the esophagus or stomach (Davis et al, 1972; Allen et al, 1970).
    3) Obtain a chest x-ray in patients with significant pulmonary signs or symptoms
    4) A water-soluble contrast material should be used initially to exclude esophageal perforation in patients with GI burns associated with alkaline ingestions, as water soluble contrast causes less injury than barium if it extravasates into tissue (Kirsh & Ritter, 1976; Chen et al, 1988).
    5) Barium esophagogram performed once perforation has been excluded may be useful to evaluate extent of injury or presence of strictures (Leape et al, 1971; Lowe et al, 1979; Chen et al, 1988).
    6) Follow-up of esophageal transit and motility in children with accidental caustic ingestion was performed using both Krypton-81 esophageal transit and triple lumen esophageal manometry. Both methods produced similar results and correlated with functional damage and degree of impairment (Cadranel et al, 1990).
    7) Cinepharyngoesophagogram may aid in the evaluation of structural and functional problems of the tongue, soft palate, epiglottis, pharynx, and esophagus after caustic ingestion (Kuhn & Tunell, 1983; Scott et al, 1992).
    B) LATE UPPER GI BARIUM CONTRAST STUDIES
    1) In a retrospective study of 155 patients with corrosive ingestions (n=120 acid injuries and n=35 alkali injuries) with grade 2b and 3 injury on initial endoscopy, evaluation by barium contrast examination of the upper GI tract was conducted 3 weeks or beyond the corrosive ingestion. Barium examination demonstrated findings of solitary or multiple strictures of varying length, intramural pseudodiverticula, linitis plastica type deformity with multiple pseudodiverticula, carcinoma in long-standing corrosive injury, and cicatrisation of the stomach. There was no difference in the radiological findings as to the type of corrosive ingested. The authors concluded that barium examination was useful in the evaluation of late sequelae of either acid or alkali corrosive injury (Nagi et al, 2004).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Symptomatic patients, and those with endoscopically demonstrated grade II or higher burns should be admitted. Patients with respiratory distress, grade III burns, acidosis, hemodynamic instability, gastrointestinal bleeding, or large ingestions should be admitted to an intensive care setting.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consider prolonged (4 hours) observation for late-onset airway compromise following caustic ingestions, including hair relaxer ingestions (Babl et al, 2001).
    B) CHILDREN who present with unintentional ingestions who remain completely asymptomatic and tolerate liquids may be discharged to home after a few hours of observation. Children who develop any signs or symptoms should be considered for evaluation by endoscopy (Rao & Hoffman, 1998).

Monitoring

    A) Obtain a complete blood count in symptomatic patients following an alkaline corrosive ingestion.
    B) In patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions), obtain renal function tests, serum electrolytes, INR, PTT, type and crossmatch for blood, and monitor urine output. Serum lactate and base deficit may also be useful in these patients.
    C) Monitor pulse oximetry or arterial blood gases in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of upper airway edema or burns.
    D) Obtain an upright chest x-ray in patients with signs and symptoms suggesting severe burns, perforation, or bleeding (or adults with deliberate, high volume or high concentration ingestions) to evaluate for pneumomediastinum or free air under the diaphragm. The absence of these findings DOES NOT rule out the possibility of necrosis or perforation of the esophagus or stomach. Obtain a chest radiograph in patients with pulmonary signs or symptoms.
    E) Several weeks after ingestion, barium contrast radiographs of the upper GI tract are useful in patients who sustained grade II or III burns, to evaluate for strictures.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) DILUTION
    1) If no respiratory compromise is present, administer milk or water as soon as possible after ingestion. The exact ideal amount is unknown; no more than 8 ounces (240 mL) in adults and 4 ounces (120 mL) in children is recommended to minimize the risk of vomiting (Caravati, 2004).
    2) USE OF DILUENTS IS CONTROVERSIAL: While experimental models have suggested that immediate dilution may lessen caustic injury (Homan et al, 1993; Homan et al, 1994a; Homan et al, 1995), this has not been adequately studied in humans.
    3) DILUENT TYPE: Use any readily available nontoxic, cool liquid. Both milk and water have been shown to be effective in experimental studies of caustic ingestion (Maull et al, 1985; Rumack & Burrington, 1977; Homan et al, 1995; Homan et al, 1994a; Homan et al, 1993).
    4) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Potential adverse effects include vomiting and airway compromise (Caravati, 2004).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Do NOT attempt dilution in patients with respiratory distress, altered mental status, severe abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, or patients who are unable to swallow or protect their airway. Diluents should not be force fed to any patient who refuses to swallow (Rao & Hoffman, 2002).
    B) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL/NOT RECOMMENDED
    1) Since the hazard of alkaline corrosive ingestion stems from local tissue injury and not from systemic absorption of toxicant, activated charcoal is not beneficial. Charcoal administration may worsen injury by causing vomiting and may interfere with the ability to visualize burns at endoscopy.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) DILUTION
    1) If no respiratory compromise is present, administer milk or water as soon as possible after ingestion. The exact ideal amount is unknown; no more than 8 ounces (240 mL) in adults and 4 ounces (120 mL) in children is recommended to minimize the risk of vomiting (Caravati, 2004).
    2) USE OF DILUENTS IS CONTROVERSIAL: While experimental models have suggested that immediate dilution may lessen caustic injury (Homan et al, 1993; Homan et al, 1994a; Homan et al, 1995), this has not been adequately studied in humans.
    3) DILUENT TYPE: Use any readily available nontoxic, cool liquid. Both milk and water have been shown to be effective in experimental studies of caustic ingestion (Maull et al, 1985; Rumack & Burrington, 1977; Homan et al, 1995; Homan et al, 1994a; Homan et al, 1993).
    4) ADVERSE EFFECTS: Potential adverse effects include vomiting and airway compromise (Caravati, 2004).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Do NOT attempt dilution in patients with respiratory distress, altered mental status, severe abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting, or patients who are unable to swallow or protect their airway. Diluents should not be force fed to any patient who refuses to swallow (Rao & Hoffman, 2002).
    6) Immediate dilution with milk or water decreased the extent of tissue injury induced by 50% sodium hydroxide in isolated rat esophagi (Homan et al, 1994).
    7) In an in vitro model, the dissolution time of clinitest tablets was not affected by the amount or type of fluid added, but heat generation was less then large fluid volumes were used, and pH change was less with orange juice than with water or milk but was independent of the fluid volume (Lacoulture et al, 1986).
    B) NEUTRALIZATION
    1) The use of neutralizing agents after caustic ingestion is NOT recommended. Neutralization has the potential to generate gas and cause exothermic reactions which might worsen injury.
    2) Experimental studies suggest that neutralization generates heat, does not limit injury unless performed immediately and that very large volumes of fluid are required to reach neutral pH (Homan et al, 1995a) Maull et al, 1985; (Rumack & Burrington, 1977a).
    3) In an in vitro model, 5% acetic acid was more effective than water at neutralizing 1.8% sodium hydroxide, but caused a greater increase in temperature (Maull et al, 1985).
    C) GASTRIC EMPTYING
    1) Should be avoided to prevent reexposure of the esophagus to the corrosive agent.
    D) NASOGASTRIC SUCTION
    1) Some clinicians may choose to insert a small, flexible nasogastric tube through the mouth, if the patient is alert and cooperative, in an attempt to remove the corrosive substance following a recent ingestion.
    2) The decision should be based on the amount of the ingestion, the concentration of the alkaline, the type of product ingested, and the risk and potential benefit to the patient.
    3) In the typical pediatric ingestion involving small volumes of corrosive materials, nasogastric suction is unlikely to be of benefit. In suicidal ingestions involving large quantities of material and an increased likelihood of severe mucosal burns, the risk of causing perforation may outweigh the potential benefit of removing caustic material.
    E) ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
    1) Since the hazard of alkaline corrosive ingestion stems from local tissue injury and not from systemic absorption of toxicant, activated charcoal is not of benefit. Charcoal administration may worsen injury by causing vomiting and may interfere with the ability to visualize burns at endoscopy.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) DILUTION
    1) Do not exceed 8 ounces in adults and 4 ounces in children (Consensus, 1988), as vomiting may occur with excessive fluid. Contraindications include perforations and patients at risk of vomiting. Keep patient NPO following initial dilution until after medical/surgical evaluation.
    a) Immediate dilution with milk or water decreased the extent of tissue injury induced by 50% sodium hydroxide in isolated rat esophagi (Homan et al, 1994).
    b) In an in vitro model, the dissolution time of clinitest tablets was not affected by the amount or type of fluid added, but heat generation was less then large fluid volumes were used, and pH change was less with orange juice than with water or milk but was independent of the fluid volume (Lacoulture et al, 1986).
    B) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE
    1) SUMMARY: Obtain consultation concerning endoscopy as soon as possible, and perform endoscopy within the first 24 hours when indicated.
    2) INDICATIONS: Endoscopy should be performed in adults with a history of deliberate ingestion, adults with any signs or symptoms attributable to inadvertent ingestion, and in children with stridor, vomiting, or drooling after unintentional ingestion (Crain et al, 1984a). Endoscopy should also be performed in children with dysphagia or refusal to swallow, significant oral burns, or abdominal pain after unintentional ingestion (Gaudreault et al, 1983a; Nuutinen et al, 1994a). Children and adults who are asymptomatic after accidental ingestion do not require endoscopy (Gupta et al, 2001; Lamireau et al, 2001; Gorman et al, 1992a).
    3) RISKS: Numerous large case series attest to the relative safety and utility of early endoscopy in the management of caustic ingestion.
    a) REFERENCES: (Dogan et al, 2006; Symbas et al, 1983; Crain et al, 1984b; Gaudreault et al, 1983b; Schild, 1985; Moazam et al, 1987a; Sugawa & Lucas, 1989; Previtera et al, 1990a; Zargar et al, 1991; Vergauwen et al, 1991a; Gorman et al, 1992a)
    4) The risk of perforation during endoscopy is minimized by (Zargar et al, 1991):
    a) Advancing across the cricopharynx under direct vision
    b) Gently advancing with minimal air insufflation
    c) Never retroverting or retroflexing the endoscope
    d) Using a pediatric flexible endoscope
    e) Using extreme caution in advancing beyond burn lesion areas
    f) Most authors recommend endoscopy within the first 24 hours of injury, not advancing the endoscope beyond areas of severe esophageal burns, and avoiding endoscopy during the subacute phase of healing when tissue slough increases the risk of perforation (5 to 15 days after ingestion) (Zargar et al, 1991).
    5) GRADING
    a) Several scales for grading caustic injury exist. The likelihood of complications such as strictures, obstruction, bleeding, and perforation is related to the severity of the initial burn (Zargar et al, 1991):
    b) Grade 0 - Normal examination
    c) Grade 1 - Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa; strictures unlikely.
    d) Grade 2A - Friability, hemorrhages, erosions, blisters, whitish membranes, exudates and superficial ulcerations; strictures unlikely.
    e) Grade 2B - Grade 2A plus deep discreet or circumferential ulceration; strictures may develop.
    f) Grade 3A - Multiple ulcerations and small scattered areas of necrosis; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation or gastrointestinal bleeding may occur.
    g) Grade 3B - Extensive necrosis through visceral wall; strictures are common, complications such as perforation, fistula formation, or gastrointestinal bleeding are more likely than with 3A.
    6) FOLLOW UP - If burns are found, follow 10 to 20 days later with barium swallow or esophagram.
    7) SCINTIGRAPHY - Scans utilizing radioisotope labelled sucralfate (technetium 99m) were performed in 22 patients with caustic ingestion and compared with endoscopy for the detection of esophageal burns. Two patients had minimal residual isotope activity on scanning but normal endoscopy and two patients had normal activity on scan but very mild erythema on endoscopy. Overall the radiolabeled sucralfate scan had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 84% and negative predictive value of 100% for detecting clinically significant burns in this population (Millar et al, 2001). This may represent an alternative to endoscopy, particularly in young children, as no sedation is required for this procedure. Further study is required.
    8) MINIPROBE ULTRASONOGRAPHY - was performed in 11 patients with corrosive ingestion . Findings were categorized as grade 0 (distinct muscular layers without thickening, grade I (distinct muscular layers with thickening), grade II (obscured muscular layers with indistinct margins) and grade III (muscular layers that could not be differentiated). Findings were further categorized as to whether the worst appearing image involved part of the circumference (type a) or the whole circumference (type b). Strictures did not develop in patients with grade 0 (5 patients) or grade I (4 patients) lesions. Transient stricture formation developed in the only patient with grade IIa lesions, and stricture requiring repeated dilatation developed in the only patient with grade IIIb lesions (Kamijo et al, 2004).
    9) In a retrospective review of 179 patients (85 acid and 94 alkali injury), the grade of mucosal injury at endoscopy was the strongest predictive factor for the occurrence of systemic, GI complications, and mortality (Poley et al, 2004).
    C) CORTICOSTEROID
    1) CORROSIVE INGESTION/SUMMARY: The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of caustic ingestion is controversial. Most animal studies have involved alkali-induced injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973). Most human studies have been retrospective and generally involve more alkali than acid-induced injury and small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury.
    2) FIRST DEGREE BURNS: These burns generally heal well and rarely result in stricture formation (Zargar et al, 1989; Howell et al, 1992). Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in these patients (Howell et al, 1992).
    3) SECOND DEGREE BURNS: Some authors recommend corticosteroid treatment to prevent stricture formation in patients with a second degree, deep-partial thickness burn (Howell et al, 1992). However, no well controlled human study has documented efficacy. Corticosteroids are generally not beneficial in patients with a second degree, superficial-partial thickness burn (Caravati, 2004; Howell et al, 1992).
    4) THIRD DEGREE BURNS: Some authors have recommended steroids in this group as well (Howell et al, 1992). A high percentage of patients with third degree burns go on to develop strictures with or without corticosteroid therapy and the risk of infection and perforation may be increased by corticosteroid use. Most authors feel that the risk outweighs any potential benefit and routine use is not recommended (Boukthir et al, 2004; Oakes et al, 1982a; Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    5) CONTRAINDICATIONS: Include active gastrointestinal bleeding and evidence of gastric or esophageal perforation. Corticosteroids are thought to be ineffective if initiated more than 48 hours after a burn (Howell, 1987).
    6) DOSE: Administer daily oral doses of 0.1 milligram/kilogram of dexamethasone or 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram of prednisone. Continue therapy for a total of 3 weeks and then taper (Haller et al, 1971; Marshall, 1979). An alternative regimen in children is intravenous prednisolone 2 milligrams/kilogram/day followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks then tapered (Anderson et al, 1990).
    7) ANTIBIOTICS: Animal studies suggest that the addition of antibiotics can prevent the infectious complications associated with corticosteroid use in the setting of caustic burns. Antibiotics are recommended if corticosteroids are used or if perforation or infection is suspected. Agents that cover anaerobes and oral flora such as penicillin, ampicillin, or clindamycin are appropriate (Rosenberg et al, 1953).
    8) STUDIES
    a) ANIMAL
    1) Some animal studies have suggested that corticosteroid therapy may reduce the incidence of stricture formation after severe alkaline corrosive injury (Haller & Bachman, 1964; Saedi et al, 1973a).
    2) Animals treated with steroids and antibiotics appear to do better than animals treated with steroids alone (Haller & Bachman, 1964).
    3) Other studies have shown no evidence of reduced stricture formation in steroid treated animals (Reyes et al, 1974). An increased rate of esophageal perforation related to steroid treatment has been found in animal studies (Knox et al, 1967).
    b) HUMAN
    1) Most human studies have been retrospective and/or uncontrolled and generally involve small numbers of patients with documented second or third degree mucosal injury. No study has proven a reduced incidence of stricture formation from steroid use in human caustic ingestions (Haller et al, 1971; Hawkins et al, 1980; Yarington & Heatly, 1963; Adam & Brick, 1982).
    2) META ANALYSIS
    a) Howell et al (1992), analyzed reports concerning 361 patients with corrosive esophageal injury published in the English language literature since 1956 (10 retrospective and 3 prospective studies). No patients with first degree burns developed strictures. Of 228 patients with second or third degree burns treated with corticosteroids and antibiotics, 54 (24%) developed strictures. Of 25 patients with similar burn severity treated without steroids or antibiotics, 13 (52%) developed strictures (Howell et al, 1992).
    b) Another meta-analysis of 10 studies found that in patients with second degree esophageal burns from caustics, the overall rate of stricture formation was 14.8% in patients who received corticosteroids compared with 36% in patients who did not receive corticosteroids (LoVecchio et al, 1996).
    c) Another study combined results of 10 papers evaluating therapy for corrosive esophageal injury in humans published between January 1991 and June 2004. There were a total of 572 patients, all patients received corticosteroids in 6 studies, in 2 studies no patients received steroids, and in 2 studies, treatment with and without corticosteroids was compared. Of 109 patients with grade 2 esophageal burns who were treated with corticosteroids, 15 (13.8%) developed strictures, compared with 2 of 32 (6.3%) patients with second degree burns who did not receive steroids (Pelclova & Navratil, 2005).
    3) Smaller studies have questioned the value of steroids (Ferguson et al, 1989a; Anderson et al, 1990), thus they should be used with caution.
    4) Ferguson et al (1989) retrospectively compared 10 patients who did not receive antibiotics or steroids with 31 patients who received both antibiotics and steroids in a study of caustic ingestion and found no difference in the incidence of esophageal stricture between the two groups (Ferguson et al, 1989a).
    5) A randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial involving 60 children with lye or acid induced esophageal injury did not find an effect of corticosteroids on the incidence of stricture formation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    a) These 60 children were among 131 patients who were managed and followed-up for ingestion of caustic material from 1971 through 1988; 88% of them were between 1 and 3 years old (Anderson et al, 1990).
    b) All patients underwent rigid esophagoscopy after being randomized to receive either no steroids or a course consisting initially of intravenous prednisolone (2 milligrams/kilogram per day) followed by 2.5 milligrams/kilogram/day of oral prednisone for a total of 3 weeks prior to tapering and discontinuation (Anderson et al, 1990).
    c) Six (19%), 15 (48%), and 10 (32%) of those in the treatment group had first, second and third degree esophageal burns, respectively. In contrast, 13 (45%), 5 (17%), and 11 (38%) of the control group had the same levels of injury (Anderson et al, 1990).
    d) Ten (32%) of those receiving steroids and 11 (38%) of the control group developed strictures. Four (13%) of those receiving steroids and 7 (24%) of the control group required esophageal replacement. All but 1 of the 21 children who developed strictures had severe circumferential burns on initial esophagoscopy (Anderson et al, 1990).
    e) Because of the small numbers of patients in this study, it lacked the power to reliably detect meaningful differences in outcome between the treatment groups (Anderson et al, 1990).
    6) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    a) The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of caustic ingestion in humans has been associated with gastric perforation (Cleveland et al, 1963) and fatal pulmonary embolism (Aceto et al, 1970).
    9) CORROSIVE BURNS/STUDIES
    a) A systematic pooled analysis was conducted over a 50-year-period and involving only those studies with patients diagnosed with endoscopically documented caustic-induced grade II burns that were either treated with a minimum 10-day course of steroid therapy or with no steroid therapy. A total of 328 patients with grade II esophageal burns were included in the analysis: 244 patients (from 3 prospective and 8 retrospective studies) given a minimum 10-day course of steroid therapy and 84 patients (from 4 prospective and 1 retrospective study) with no steroid therapy. Thirty patients (12.3%) in the steroid group developed strictures and 16 patients (19%) in the non-steroid group developed strictures, which was not statistically significant, indicating that there appears to be no proven benefit for the use of steroid therapy in patients with grade II esophageal burns (Fulton & Hoffman, 2007).
    b) In a study of 154 children with grade IIb and 3 corrosive burns (mostly alkali) who received antibiotics, steroids, and H2 receptor blockers, esophageal stricture developed in 11 patients, 2 had gastric outlet obstruction and 1 developed perforation following exposure (Dogan et al, 2006).
    c) A retrospective review of cases over a 37-year-period (from 1957 to 1994), involving 239 patients who had ingested commercial sodium hydroxide, revealed that the mean incidence of stenosis present in patients following the use of prednisone, in doses ranging from 0.75 to 2 mg/kg/day, was 48.1% (n=79) as compared with 69% (n=29) in patients who were not treated with a corticosteroid. During the period from 1957 to 1987, the incidence of stenosis in the prednisone-treated group was 61% (n=46) as compared with 100% (n=14) in the patients not treated with a corticosteroid. A contributing factor to the incidence of stenosis was the amount of sodium hydroxide ingested. The review showed that patients who had ingested from a trace to one tablespoon were less likely to develop stenosis, and were given lower doses of prednisone, resulting in fewer corticosteroid-induced complications. Other therapies given following sodium hydroxide ingestion included dilution with water or milk, the use of a nasogastric tube, and antibiotics combined with prednisone (Mamede & De Mello Filho, 2002).
    D) SURGICAL PROCEDURE
    1) SUMMARY: Initially if severe esophageal burns are found a string may be placed in the stomach to facilitate later dilation. Insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube after confirmation of a circumferential burn may prevent strictures. Dilation is indicated after 2 to 4 weeks if strictures are confirmed. If dilation is unsuccessful colonic intraposition or gastric tube placement may be needed. Early laparotomy should be considered in patients with evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns on endoscopy.
    2) STRING - If a second degree or circumferential burn of the esophagus is found a string may be placed in the stomach to avoid false channel and to provide a guide for later dilation procedures (Gandhi et al, 1989).
    3) STENT - The insertion of a specialized nasogastric tube or stent immediately after endoscopically proven deep circumferential burns is preferred by some surgeons to prevent stricture formation (Mills et al, 1978; (Wijburg et al, 1985; Coln & Chang, 1986).
    a) STUDY - In a study of 11 children with deep circumferential esophageal burns after caustic ingestion, insertion of a silicone rubber nasogastric tube for 5 to 6 weeks without steroids or antibiotics was associated with stricture formation in only one case (Wijburg et al, 1989).
    4) DILATION - Dilation should be performed at 1 to 4 week intervals when stricture is present(Gundogdu et al, 1992). Repeated dilation may be required over many months to years in some patients. Successful dilation of gastric antral strictures has also been reported (Hogan & Polter, 1986; Treem et al, 1987).
    5) COLONIC REPLACEMENT - Intraposition of colon may be necessary if dilation fails to provide an adequate sized esophagus (Chiene et al, 1974; Little et al, 1988; Huy & Celerier, 1988).
    6) LAPAROTOMY/LAPAROSCOPY - Several authors advocate laparotomy or laparoscopy in patients with endoscopic evidence of severe esophageal or gastric burns to evaluate for the presence of transmural gastric or esophageal necrosis (Cattan et al, 2000; Estrera et al, 1986a; Meredith et al, 1988; Wu & Lai, 1993).
    a) STUDY - In a retrospective study of patients with extensive transmural esophageal necrosis after caustic ingestion, all 4 patients treated in the conventional manner (esophagoscopy, steroids, antibiotics, and repeated evaluation for the occurrence of esophagogastric necrosis and perforation) died while all 3 patients treated with early laparotomy and immediate esophagogastric resection survived (Estrera et al, 1986a).
    7) DILATION/STUDIES
    a) Among 15 pediatric patients with esophageal strictures who received endoscope-associated dilatation, 9 patients had functionally subnormal recovery and 6 had poor recovery, requiring either frequent feeding or having growth retardation (Huang et al, 2004).
    b) Anastomotic esophagorespiratory strictures may require repeated esophageal dilatations after reconstruction (Makela et al, 1998).
    c) A retrospective study, involving 11 children (ages ranging from 1 to 14 years) who developed esophageal strictures following ingestion of a corrosive substance and subsequently underwent balloon dilatation, showed that the dilatation procedure was technically successful in 10 patients (91%) and in 35 dilatation sessions (97%), with improvement of the luminal diameter as seen with an esophagram performed immediately after dilatation. However, clinical success, defined as improved food intake and reduced dysphagia within one month of the first dilatation procedure, only occurred in 7 patients (64%). During the 35-month follow-up period, 10 of the 11 patients experienced recurrence of the esophageal strictures following the initial balloon dilatation. Seven patients underwent additional dilatations and 3 patients underwent either stent placement or surgery or both (Doo et al, 2009).
    8) SURGICAL/STUDIES
    a) In a retrospective study of 53 patients with clinical and/or endoscopic signs of caustic agent injury, 8 patients (6 with acid ingestion; 7 as intentional ingestions) underwent urgent surgery. Four had esophageal necrosis and gastric perforation, 2 had esophageal, gastric, duodenal and jejunal necrosis, 1 had necrosis of the gastric fundus and 1 had normal findings at laparotomy. The mortality rate was 11% and the authors concluded that endoscopic evaluation and early surgery may reduce morbidity and mortality (Ertekin et al, 2004).
    b) In a retrospective review of 9 patients with intentional alkali ingestions of greater than 100 mL, early, aggressive surgical intervention to identify and resect necrotic tissue allowed for successful later reconstruction and improved outcomes. The development of an esophagorespiratory fistula required immediate surgical intervention. First- and second-degree injuries can be treated after the patient has been stabilized (Makela et al, 1998).
    c) Esophageal reconstruction, involving colon interposition, has been performed in patients with esophageal strictures due to ingested caustic substances. According to a retrospective review, conducted in Belgrade, Serbia, over a 40-year-period, 336 patients with caustic-induced esophageal strictures underwent colon interposition, with 12.5% of patients also undergoing an esophagectomy concurrently. Left colon transplants were used in 258 (76.7%) patients. Early postoperative complications occurred in 89 patients and included pneumothorax/hemopneumothorax (13.09%), cervical anastomotic leakage (9.23%), transplant necrosis (2.38%), and abdominal anastomotic leakage (0.89%). Late postoperative complications occurred in 47 patients and included cervical anastomotic strictures (4.46%), thoracic outlet compression (2.08%), bowel obstruction (1.49%), and peptic colon ulceration (1.19%). Long-term follow up (1 to 30 years post-transplant, median 14.3 years) in 285 patients (84.82%) indicated good functional results in 233 patients (81.75%) (Knezevic et al, 2007).
    d) POST-CAUSTIC INJURY STENOSIS SURGICAL MANAGEMENT - Almost 50% of patients with post-caustic injury stenosis will require surgical treatment. Laryngeal, pharyngeal, esophageal and/or gastric dilations, resections and/or plastic reconstruction with colon or ileum may be required. In a 10-year Romanian experience, the hospital mortality rate was 3.4% with postoperative morbidity in 20.6% including cervical anastomosis leakages and pleural effusions (Dascalescu et al, 2005).
    E) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    1) STRICTURE DILATION AND MITOMYCIN - An 18-month-old girl developed an esophageal stricture that required weekly dilatation (over 16 weeks) after ingesting caustic soda. Dilatation was there performed general anesthesia, and topical mitomycin C (which has been used to treat tracheal stenosis) was applied by a cotton pledget soaked in a solution (0.1 mg/mL) for 2 minutes to the stricture. The procedure was repeated one week later. She needed only one additional endoscopic dilatation. At her 3 month follow-up, minimal residual stenosis was seen through a pediatric endoscope, and esophageal manometry and motility tests were normal (Afzal et al, 2002).
    2) TRIMETAZIDINE (ANIMAL STUDY) - A study, involving 30 Wistar albino rats, was conducted for determination of the efficacy of trimetazidine, an antioxidant, for the prevention of stricture development following esophageal caustic injuries. The 30 rats were divided into 3 groups: Group A were uninjured and untreated, Group B were given esophageal burns following application of 1 milliliter of 37.5% sodium hydroxide for 90 seconds followed by a water rinse but were not given treatment, and Group C were given esophageal burns and then were treated with trimetazidine, 5 milligrams/kilogram/day intraperitoneally. The results of this study showed a significant difference between groups B and C in the stenosis index (a calculation involving the measurement of the lumen diameter and the esophageal wall thickness) (0.94 +/- 0.21 versus 0.34 +/- 0.10), in the hydroxyproline level (1.33 +/- 0.08 mcg/mg of wet tissue versus 1.06 +/- 0.14 mcg/mg), and in the histopathologic damage score (3 versus 1), all of which indicate that trimetazidine treatment may be useful in reducing the degree of fibrosis and preventing stricture development in corrosive esophagitis; however, further studies are warranted (Yukselen et al, 2005).
    3) ALLOPURINOL (ANIMAL STUDY) - A randomized, controlled study was conducted, involving 60 Wistar rats, for determination of allopurinol efficacy in reducing oxidative stress and in prevention of stricture development following caustic-induced esophageal injuries. The rats were divided into acute phase and chronic phase groups. Both groups were then divided into subgroups: group A in the acute phase (or X in the chronic phase), which received only 0.9% saline with no caustic esophageal burn, group B(Y), which underwent caustic esophageal burn (1 mL of 37.5% sodium hydroxide applied to the distal esophagus) and received 0.9% saline, 1 mL/day intraperitoneally, and group C(Z), which underwent gastric esophageal burn and received 40 mg/kg allopurinol daily for either 2 days (acute phase) or 3 days (chronic phase). In the acute phase, allopurinol did not prevent lipid peroxidation or oxidative stress, as evidenced by insignificant differences in tissue malondialdehyde, glutathione, and nitric oxide levels. However, histopathologic damage scores were significantly lower in the allopurinol-treated group, as compared with the other two groups, suggesting that allopurinol decreased the development of fibrosis in the chronic phase. Further studies are warranted (Makay et al, 2007).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) OXYGEN
    1) Administer oxygen. In patients with pulmonary symptoms determine blood gases, obtain chest x-ray and, if pulmonary edema is present, consider positive end expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP).
    B) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Manage airway aggressively. Intubate any patient with significant stridor, respiratory distress or upper airway edema. Be prepared to perform cricothyroidotomy as intubation may be difficult secondary to edema.
    2) Bronchoscopy should be performed in any patient with hypoxia, increased Aa gradient, or pleural effusion to evaluate for tracheal or bronchial injury (Palmer et al, 2007).
    C) BRONCHOSPASM
    1) BRONCHOSPASM SUMMARY
    a) Administer beta2 adrenergic agonists. Consider use of inhaled ipratropium and systemic corticosteroids. Monitor peak expiratory flow rate, monitor for hypoxia and respiratory failure, and administer oxygen as necessary.
    2) ALBUTEROL/ADULT DOSE
    a) 2.5 to 5 milligrams diluted with 4 milliliters of 0.9% saline by nebulizer every 20 minutes for three doses. If incomplete response, administer 2.5 to 10 milligrams every 1 to 4 hours as needed OR administer 10 to 15 milligrams every hour by continuous nebulizer as needed. Consider adding ipratropium to the nebulized albuterol; DOSE: 0.5 milligram by nebulizer every 30 minutes for three doses then every 2 to 4 hours as needed, NOT administered as a single agent (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    3) ALBUTEROL/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    a) 0.15 milligram/kilogram (minimum 2.5 milligrams) diluted with 4 milliliters of 0.9% saline by nebulizer every 20 minutes for three doses. If incomplete response administer 0.15 to 0.3 milligram/kilogram (maximum 10 milligrams) every 1 to 4 hours as needed OR administer 0.5 mg/kg/hr by continuous nebulizer as needed. Consider adding ipratropium to the nebulized albuterol; DOSE: 0.25 to 0.5 milligram by nebulizer every 20 minutes for three doses then every 2 to 4 hours as needed, NOT administered as a single agent (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    4) ALBUTEROL/CAUTIONS
    a) The incidence of adverse effects of beta2-agonists may be increased in older patients, particularly those with pre-existing ischemic heart disease (National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, 2007). Monitor for tachycardia, tremors.
    5) CORTICOSTEROIDS
    a) Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm. PREDNISONE: ADULT: 40 to 80 milligrams/day in 1 or 2 divided doses. CHILD: 1 to 2 milligrams/kilogram/day (maximum 60 mg) in 1 or 2 divided doses (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007).
    6) Steroids may provide benefit in patients with bronchospasm but antibiotics are useful only if there is evidence of infection.
    D) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Evaluate for esophageal and dermal burns as clinically indicated.
    E) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Exposed eyes should be irrigated with copious amounts of water for at least 30 minutes. An examination should always be performed. Ophthalmologic consultation should be considered. Following an alkali ocular burn, free alkali appears to be regenerated via slow dissociation of cation from combination with corneal proteins in sufficient amount to keep the pH above normal during 15 or 20 minutes of irrigation. Thus, it is paramount to continue irrigation for at least 30 minutes (Grant & Schuman, 1993). Some authors recommend a minimum of 1 or 2 hours or until the pH has been stable for at least 30 minutes (Corazza et al, 2004).
    B) In a retrospective review, 36 patients (a total of 49 eyes exposed) who immediately irrigated their eyes following an ocular alkali burn were compared with 17 (a total of 29 eyes exposed) patients who did not irrigate their eyes. Grade I injury was observed in 76% of the eyes that were irrigated, while 86% of the eyes that were not immediately irrigated had grade II injuries. Mean time to healing was 8 days in irrigation group versus 29 days in the non-irrigation group (Ikeda et al, 2006).
    C) In an ex vivo experiment on rabbit eyes, a borate buffer solution (Cederroth Eye Wash Solution), and an amphoteric and chelating molecules (Diphoterine- and Previn solutions, respectively) produced faster and more complete return of normal pH compared with water. Saline and isotonic phosphate buffer were found to be ineffective at lowering intracameral pH after alkali ocular burns (Rihawi et al, 2006).
    D) Sticky lime (calcium hydroxide) paste may be removed from the conjunctiva or cul-de-sac by using a cotton tipped applicator soaked in 0.01 M sodium EDTA (Pfister & Koski, 1982; Burns & Paterson, 1989).
    6.8.2) TREATMENT
    A) INJURY OF GLOBE OF EYE
    1) EVALUATION
    a) ASSESSMENT CAUSTIC EYE BURNS: It may take 48 to 72 hours after the burn to assess correctly the degree of ocular damage (Brodovsky et al, 2000).
    b) The 1965 Roper-Hall classification uses the size of the corneal epithelial defect, the degree of corneal opacification and extent of limbal ischemia to evaluate the extent of the chemical ocular injury (Brodovsky et al, 2000; Singh et al, 2013):
    1) GRADE 1 (prognosis good): Corneal epithelial damage; no limbal ischemia.
    2) GRADE 2 (prognosis good): Cornea hazy; iris details visible, ischemia less than one-third of limbus.
    3) GRADE 3 (prognosis guarded): Total loss of corneal epithelium; stromal haze obscures iris details; ischemia of one-third to one-half of limbus.
    4) GRADE 4 (prognosis poor): Cornea opaque; iris and pupil obscured, ischemia affects more than one-half of limbus.
    c) A newer classification (Dua) is based on clock hour limbal involvement as well as a percentage of bulbar conjunctival involvement (Singh et al, 2013):
    1) GRADE 1 (prognosis very good): 0 clock hour of limbal involvement and 0% conjunctival involvement.
    2) GRADE 2 (prognosis good): Less than 3 clock hour of limbal involvement and less than 30% conjunctival involvement.
    3) GRADE 3 (prognosis good): Greater than 3 and up to 6 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 30% to 50% conjunctival involvement.
    4) GRADE 4 (prognosis good to guarded): Greater than 6 and up to 9 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 50% to 75% conjunctival involvement.
    5) GRADE 5 (prognosis guarded to poor): Greater than 9 and less than 12 clock hour of limbal involvement and greater than 75% and less than 100% conjunctival involvement.
    6) GRADE 6 (very poor): Total limbus (12 clock hour) involved and 100% conjunctival involvement.
    2) MEDICAL FACILITY IRRIGATION
    a) Begin irrigation immediately with copious amounts of water or sterile 0.9% saline, which ever is more rapidly available. Lactated Ringer's solution may also be effective. Once irrigation has begun, instill a drop of local anesthetic (eg, 0.5% proparacaine) for comfort; switching from water to slightly warmed sterile saline may also improve patient comfort (Singh et al, 2013; Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Ernst et al, 1998; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). In one study, isotonic saline, lactated Ringer's solution, normal saline with bicarbonate, and balanced saline plus (BSS Plus) were compared and no difference in normalization of pH were found; however, BSS Plus was better tolerated and more comfortable (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    1) Continue irrigation for at least an hour or until the superior and inferior cul-de-sacs have returned to neutrality (check pH every 30 minutes), pH of 7.0 to 8.0, and remain so for 30 minutes after irrigation is discontinued (Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Brodovsky et al, 2000a). After severe alkaline burns, the pH of the conjunctival sac may only return to a pH of 8 or 8.5 even after extensive irrigation (Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Irrigating volumes up to 20 L or more have been used to neutralize the pH (Singh et al, 2013; Fish & Davidson, 2010). Immediate and prolonged irrigation is associated with improved visual acuity, shorter hospital stay and fewer surgical interventions (Kuckelkorn et al, 1995; Saari et al, 1984).
    2) Search the conjunctival sac for solid particles and remove them while continuing irrigation (Grant & Schuman, 1993a).
    3) For significant alkaline or concentrated acid burns with evidence of eye injury irrigation should be continued for at least 2 to 3 hours, potentially as long as 24 to 48 hours if pH not normalized, in an attempt to normalize the pH of the anterior chamber (Smilkstein & Fraunfelder, 2002). Emergent ophthalmologic consultation is needed in these cases (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    3) MINOR INJURY
    a) SUMMARY
    1) If ocular damage is minor, artificial tears/lubricants, topical cycloplegics, and antibiotics may be all that are needed.
    b) ARTIFICIAL TEARS
    1) To promote re-epithelization, preservative-free artificial tears/lubricants (eg, hyaluronic acid hourly) may be used (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    c) TOPICAL CYCLOPLEGIC
    1) Use to guard against development of posterior synechiae and ciliary spasm (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Cyclopentolate 0.5% or 1% eye drops may be administered 4 times daily to control pain (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    d) TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
    1) An antibiotic ophthalmic ointment or drops should be used for as long as epithelial defects persist (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Topical erythromycin or tetracycline ointment may be used (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    e) PAIN CONTROL
    1) If pain control is required, oral or parenteral NSAIDs or narcotics are preferred to topical ocular anesthetics, which may cause local corneal epithelial damage if used repeatedly (Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). However, topical 0.5% proparacaine has been recommended (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    4) SEVERE INJURY
    a) SUMMARY
    1) If the damage is minor, the above may be all that is needed. For grade 3 or 4 injuries, one or more of the following may be used, only with ophthalmologic consultation: acetazolamide, topical timolol, topical steroids, citrate, ascorbate, EDTA, cysteine, NAC, penicillamine, tetracycline, or soft contact lenses.
    b) ARTIFICIAL TEARS
    1) To promote re-epithelization, preservative-free artificial tears/lubricants (eg, hyaluronic acid hourly) may be used (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    c) PAIN CONTROL
    1) If pain control is required, oral or parenteral NSAIDs or narcotics are preferred to topical ocular anesthetics, which may cause local corneal epithelial damage if used repeatedly (Spector & Fernandez, 2008; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). However, topical 0.5% proparacaine has been recommended (Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    d) CARBONIC ANHYDRASE INHIBITOR
    1) Acetazolamide (250 mg orally 4 times daily) may be given to control increased intraocular pressure (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    e) TOPICAL STEROIDS
    1) DOSE: Dexamethasone 0.1% ointment 4 times daily to reduce inflammation. If persistent epithelial defect is present, discontinue dexamethasone by day 14 to reduce the risk of stromal melt (Tuft & Shortt, 2009). Other sources suggest that corticosteroids should be stopped if the epithelium has not covered surface defects by 5 to 7 days (Grant & Schuman, 1993b).
    2) Topical prednisolone 0.5% has also been used. A further increase in corneoscleral melt may occur if topical steroids are used alone. In one study, topical prednisolone 0.5% was used in combination with topical ascorbate 10%; no increase in corneoscleral melt was observed when topical steroids were used until re-epithelization (Singh et al, 2013; Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    3) In one retrospective study, fluorometholone 1% drops were administered every 2 hours initially, then decreased to four times daily when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    f) ASCORBATE
    1) Oral or topical ascorbate may be used to promote epithelial healing and reduce the risk of stromal necrosis (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    2) DOSE: Ascorbate 10% 4 times daily topically or 1 g orally (2 g/day) (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    3) Ascorbate is needed for the formation of collagen and the concentration of ascorbate in the anterior chamber is decreased when the ciliary body is damaged by alkali burns (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Grant & Schuman, 1993b). In one retrospective study, ascorbate drops (10%) were administered every 2 hours, then decreased to 4 times a day when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete. These patients also received 500 mg of oral ascorbate 4 times daily, until discharge from the hospital (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    g) CITRATE
    1) Topical citrate may be used to promote epithelial healing and reduce the risk of stromal necrosis (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    2) DOSE: Potassium citrate 10% 4 times daily topically (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    3) Citrate chelates calcium, and thereby interferes with the harmful effects of neutrophil accumulation, such as release of proteolytic enzymes and superoxide free radicals, phagocytosis and ulceration (Grant & Schuman, 1993b). In one retrospective study, 10% citrate drops were administered every 2 hours, then decreased to 4 times a day when there was evidence of progressive corneal reepithelialization and lessened inflammation, and discontinued when corneal reepithelialization was complete. These patients also received a urinary alkalinizer containing 720 mg of citric acid anhydrous and 630 mg of sodium citrate anhydrous 3 times daily, until discharge from the hospital (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    a) STUDY: The combination of intensive topical corticosteroids, topical citrate and ascorbate, and oral citrate and ascorbate was associated with improved best corrected visual acuity and a trend towards more rapid corneal reepithelialization in Grade 3 alkali burns in one retrospective study (Brodovsky et al, 2000a).
    h) COLLAGENASE INHIBITORS
    1) Inhibitors of collagenase can inhibit collagenolytic activity, prevent stromal ulceration, and promote wound healing. Several effective agents, such as cysteine, n-acetylcysteine, sodium ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), calcium EDTA, penicillamine, and citrate, have been recommended (Singh et al, 2013; Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Perry et al, 1993; Seedor et al, 1987).
    2) TETRACYCLINE: Has been found to have an anticollagenolytic effect. Systemic tetracycline 50 mg/kg/day reduced the incidence of alkali-induced corneal ulcerations in rabbits (Seedor et al, 1987).
    3) DOXYCYCLINE: Decreased epithelial defects and collagenase activity in a rabbit model of alkali burns to the eye (Perry et al, 1993). DOSE: 100 mg twice daily (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    i) ANTIBIOTICS
    1) An antibiotic ophthalmic ointment or drops should be used for as long as epithelial defects persist (Brodovsky et al, 2000b; Grant & Schuman, 1993a). Topical erythromycin or tetracycline ointment may be used (Spector & Fernandez, 2008). In patients with severe burns, a topical fluoroquinolone antibiotic drop 4 times daily may also be used (Tuft & Shortt, 2009). A topical fourth generation fluoroquinolone has been recommended as an antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with large epithelial defect (Fish & Davidson, 2010).
    j) TOPICAL CYCLOPLEGIC
    1) Cyclopentolate 0.5% or 1% eye drops may be administered 4 times daily to control pain (Tuft & Shortt, 2009; Spector & Fernandez, 2008).
    k) SOFT CONTACT LENSES
    1) A bandage contact lens (eg, silicone hydrogel) may make the patient more comfortable and protect the surface (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009). Hydrophilic high oxygen permeability lenses are preferred (Singh et al, 2013). Soft lenses with intermediate water content and inherent rigidity may facilitate reepithelialization. The use of 0.5 normal sodium chloride drops hourly and artificial tears or lubricant eyedrops instilled 4 times a day may help maintain adequate hydration and lens mobility.
    5) SURGICAL THERAPY
    a) SURGICAL THERAPY CAUSTIC EYE INJURY
    1) Early insertion of methylmethacrylate ring or suturing saran wrap over palpebral and cul-de-sac conjunctiva may prevent fibrinosis adhesions and reduce fibrotic contracture of conjunctiva, but the advantage of such treatments is not clear.
    2) Limbal stem cell transplantation has been used successfully in both the acute stage of injury and the chronically scarred healing phase in patients with persistent epithelial defects after chemical burns (Azuara-Blanco et al, 1999; Morgan & Murray, 1996; Ronk et al, 1994).
    3) In some patients, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) has been successful in improving corneal healing and visual acuity in patients with persistent epithelial defects after chemical burns. It can restore the conjunctival surface and decrease limbal stromal inflammation (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Sridhar et al, 2000; Su & Lin, 2000; Meller et al, 2000; Azuara-Blanco et al, 1999).
    4) Control glaucoma. Remove any cataracts formed (Fish & Davidson, 2010; Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    5) In patients with severe injury, tenonplasty can be performed to promote epithelialization and prevent melting (Tuft & Shortt, 2009).
    6) A keratoprosthesis placement has also been indicated in severe cases (Fish & Davidson, 2010). Penetrating keratoplasty is usually delayed as long as possible as results appear to be better with a greater lag time between injury and keratoplasty (Grant & Schuman, 1993a).
    B) EDETATE CALCIUM DISODIUM
    1) Sticky lime (calcium hydroxide) paste may be removed from the conjunctiva or cul-de-sac by using a cotton tipped applicator soaked in 0.01 M sodium EDTA (Pfister & Koski, 1982).
    2) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY
    a) Topical human amniotic fluid (HAF) was evaluated in the treatment of ocular acute alkali burns in mice. Median epithelial defect at day 4 and overall change in ocular burn score between days 2 and 14 were significantly improved with both pre-term and term HAF versus saline. On histologic examination saline solution-treated corneas had more inflammatory cells and blood vessels than HAF-treated cornea (Herretes et al, 2006).
    C) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) Remove contaminated clothing and remove particulate matter adherent to skin. Irrigate exposed skin with copious amounts of water for at least 15 minutes or longer, depending on the concentration, amount and duration of exposure to the chemical. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists after washing.
    B) NEUTRALIZATION
    1) ANIMAL STUDY - In an in vivo animal study, rats were exposed to a dermal 2N sodium hydroxide alkaline injury neutralized with either a 5% acetic acid (ie, household vinegar) solution or water irrigation and evaluated by subdermal needle probes until pH returned to physiologic values. Punch-biopsy specimens were obtained from wound edges 24 hours and 10 days after injury. Animals treated with acetic acid demonstrated a more rapid return to physiologic pH, increased depth of dermal retention, decreased leukocyte infiltrate, and improved epithelial regeneration when compared with animals treated with water irrigation. No difference was detected in peak pH or in rise of skin temperature between acetic acid-neutralized and water-irrigated burn wounds (Andrews et al, 2003).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) IRRIGATION
    1) Prolonged irrigation may be required in severe cases, occasionally up to 12 to 24 hours (Moran et al, 1987; Saydjari et al, 1986).
    2) Dermal contact with strong alkalis (pH above 12.5) may result in continuing damage due to the chemical's ability to penetrate tissue and produce vascular thrombosis and necrosis. Once penetration has occurred, continuous skin washing has less effect, and in theory, vigorous rubbing from washing exposed skin with soap and water could increase dermal penetration of the alkali (Winder, 1997).
    B) DECONTAMINATION
    1) Remove any solid particles form the skin with forceps (Herbert & Lawrence, 1989).
    2) Compresses of neutral phosphate buffer may be applied after irrigation is complete (Herbert & Lawerence, 1989).
    C) SURGICAL PROCEDURE
    1) Early excision of significant burns and grafting is recommended by some authors to avoid recurrent skin breakdown (O'Donoghue et al, 1994).
    2) Patients with second or third degree burns involving significant body surface area, hands, feet, face or genitalia should be referred to a burn center.
    D) FLUID/ELECTROLYTE BALANCE REGULATION
    1) Institute intravenous fluid resuscitation as with any burn (Saydjari et al, 1986).
    E) GENERAL TREATMENT
    1) Evaluate for ocular, pulmonary, oral and esophageal injury as clinically appropriate.
    F) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Summary

    A) LIQUID CORROSIVES - With highly concentrated liquids (30% sodium hydroxide) esophageal burns may occur in up to 100% of patients, even after accidental ingestion.
    B) Serious burns are less likely if the pH is less than 11.5. Injury is greater with large exposures and high concentrations.
    C) More recent series of caustic ingestions (mixed liquid and solid) in children report incidences of significant esophageal burns from 5% to 35%. Adults with deliberate ingestions are more likely to develop significant esophageal burns (30% to 80%).
    D) LOW PHOSPHATE DETERGENTS and electric dishwasher soaps may result in oral and esophageal burns.

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) GENERAL
    1) The corrosive effects of alkaline chemicals usually occur rapidly.
    2) In a cat model 1 milliliter of 30% sodium hydroxide produced transesophageal necrosis (Leape et al, 1971).
    3) Some series of liquid corrosives (30% sodium hydroxide) report esophageal burns in 100 percent of patients (Leape et al, 1971).
    4) Formulations of household cleaning products now contain lower concentrations of alkaline corrosives. More recent series of caustic ingestions (mixed liquid and solid) in children report incidences of significant esophageal burns from 5% to 35% (Crain et al, 1984; Gorman et al, 1992; Previtera et al, 1990; Vergauwen et al, 1991).
    5) The incidence of significant esophageal burns is higher in most series with a preponderance of adults, ranging from 30% to 79%, presumably related to the larger quantities ingested in patients with suicidal intent (Arford & Harris, 1959; (Hawkins et al, 1980) Sugwa & Lucas, 1989; (Christesen, 1994).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) Alkaline corrosives cause liquefaction necrosis, allowing deep penetration into mucosal tissue as cells are destroyed. Concentrated solutions of caustic materials can produce transmural necrosis with exposures as short as one second. Burns of the esophagus follow four distinct phases (Wolpowitz, 1974; Endicott, 1971)
    1) INFLAMMATORY PHASE - lasts one or two days and demonstrates marked fibroblastic proliferation. Perforations may occur at this stage with resultant mediastinitis.
    2) NECROTIC PHASE - occurs one to four days after injury. Cells die from coagulation of intracellular protein and inflammation of surrounding tissue develops. Vascular thrombosis and bacterial invasion worsen injury. Esophagoscopy is contraindicated as the esophagus is especially vulnerable to perforation.
    3) GRANULATION PHASE - begins 3 to 5 days post injury when necrotic tissue sloughs. Granulation tissue begins to fill in tissue defects and connective tissue begins to form in 10 to 12 days.
    4) CONSTRICTION PHASE - occurs 2 1/2 to 3 weeks following injury. Marked narrowing of the esophageal lumen may occur as the collagen fibers begin to contract.
    B) MECHANISM OF OCULAR TOXICITY -
    1) All alkalis saponify the fats in the cell membrane, destroying the cell.
    2) The OH- ion reacts with collagen causing swelling, shortening and thickening of these fibrils.
    3) If the ciliary body is penetrated, the aqueous humor is affected both quantitatively and qualitatively.
    4) Aqueous and corneal stroma glucose is reduced, as is the ascorbate needed for collagen synthesis (Pfister & Patterson, 1977).
    5) Collagen loss (corneal stromal ulceration) occurs 2 to 3 weeks after exposure.
    6) Collagen becomes more susceptible to enzymatic degradation.

General Bibliography

    1) Aceto T Jr, Terplan K, & Fiore RR: Chemical burns of the esophagus in children and glucocorticoid therapy. J Med 1970; 1:101-109.
    2) Adam JS & Brick HG: Pediatric caustic ingestion. Ann Otol Laryngol 1982; 91:656-658.
    3) Afzal NA, Albert D, & Thomas AL: A child with oesophageal strictures. Lancet 2002; 359:1032.
    4) Agarwal T, Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, et al: Severe ocular injury resulting from chuna packets. Ophthalmology 2006; 113(6):961-.
    5) Alford BR & Harris HH: Chemical burns of the mouth, pharynx and esophagus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1959; 686:122-128.
    6) Allen RE, Thoshinsky MJ, & Stallone RJ: Corrosive injuries of the stomach. Arch Surg 1970; 100:409-413.
    7) Anderson KD, Touse TM, & Randolph JG: A controlled trial of corticosteroids in children with corrosive injury of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:637-640.
    8) Andrews K, Mowlavi A, & Milner SM: The treatment of alkaline burns of the skin by neutralization. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111(6):1918-1921.
    9) Appelqvist P & Salmo M: Lye corrosion carcinoma of the esophagus: a review of 63 cases. Cancer 1980; 45:2655-2658.
    10) Arevalo-Silva C, Eliashar R, Wohlgelernter J, et al: Ingestion of caustic substances: a 15-year experience. Laryngoscope 2006; 116(8):1422-1426.
    11) Audi J, Louwrens N, & Seifert SA: Brochiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) in an elderly female after inhalation of sodium hydroxide with isobutane propellant oven cleaner. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2006; 44(5):627-.
    12) Azuara-Blanco A, Pillai CT, & Dua HS: Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83:399-402.
    13) Babl FE, Edelberg LH, & Shannon M: Oral and airway sequelae after hair relaxer ingestion. Ped Emerg Care 2001; 17:36-37.
    14) Benedict EB: Carcinoma of the esophagus developing in benign stricture. N Engl J Med 1941; 224:408-412.
    15) Bentur Y & Rubin AE: Obstructive airway disease associated with occupational sodium hydroxide inhalation (abstract). Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:374.
    16) Bigelow NH: Carcinoma of the esophagus developing at the site of lye stricture. Cancer 1953; 6:1159-1164.
    17) Bonatucci CA, Goldfarb W, & Slater H: Inhalation injury with calcium oxide-a case report. JBCR 1984; 4:282-283.
    18) Borja AR, Ransdell HT, & Thomas TV: Lye injuries of the esophagus. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 57:533-538.
    19) Boukthir S, Fetni I, Mrad SM, et al: [High doses of steroids in the management of caustic esophageal burns in children]. Arch Pediatr 2004; 11(1):13-17.
    20) Brodovsky SC, McCarty AC, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year retrospective review. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:1829-1835.
    21) Brodovsky SC, McCarty CA, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year retrospective review. Ophthalmology 2000a; 107:1829-1835.
    22) Brodovsky SC, McCarty CA, & Snibson G: Management of alkali burns an 11-year review. Ophthalmology 2000b; 107:1829-1835.
    23) Burns FR & Paterson CA: Prompt irrigation of chemical eye injuries may avert severe damage. Occupational Health & Safety 1989; 58:33-36.
    24) Burrington JD: Clinitest burns of the esophagus. Ann Thoracic Surg 1975; 4:400-404.
    25) Cadranel S, Di Lorenzo C, & Rodesch P: Caustic ingestion and esophageal function. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1990; 10:164-168.
    26) Caravati EM: Alkali. In: Dart RC, ed. Medical Toxicology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2004.
    27) Carroll L, Agnone F, & Vance M: Laproscopic evaluation after lye ingestion (abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1994; 36:137.
    28) Cattan P, Munoz-Bongrand N, & Berney T: Extensive abdominal surgery after caustic ingestion. Ann Surg 2000; 231:519-523.
    29) Cello JP, Fogel RP, & Boland CR: Liquid caustic ingestion: spectrum of injury. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140:501-504.
    30) Chen YM, Ott DJ, & Thompson JN: Progressive roentgenographic appearance of caustic esophagitis. South Med J 1988; 81:724-728.
    31) Cheng HT, Cheng CL, Lin CH, et al: Caustic ingestion in adults: the role of endoscopic classification in predicting outcome. BMC Gastroenterol 2008; 8 :31.
    32) Chiene KY, Wang PY, & Lu KS: Esophagoplasty of corrosive stricture of the esophagus. Ann Surg 1974; 179:510-515.
    33) Christesen HBT: Caustic ingestion in adults - epidemiology and prevention. Clin Toxicol 1994; 32:557-568.
    34) Clausen JO, Nielsen TLF, & Fogh A: Admission to Danish hospitals after suspected ingestion of corrosives - a nationwide survey (1985-1988) comprising children aged 0-14 years. Dan Med Bull 1994; 41:234-237.
    35) Cleveland WW, Chandler JR, & Lawson RB: Treatment of caustic burns of the esophagus. JAMA 1963; 186:182-183.
    36) Coln D & Chang JHT: Experience with esophageal stenting for caustic burns in children. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21:588-592.
    37) Consensus: POISINDEX(R) Editorial Board Consensus opinion poll, Irritants/Caustics Specialty Board, Micromedex, Inc, Greenwood Village, CO, 1988.
    38) Corazza M, Trincone S, & Virgili A: Effects of airbag deployment: lesions, epidemiology, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5(5):295-300.
    39) Crain EF, Gershel JC, & Mezey AP: Caustic ingestions. Symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury. Am J Dis Child 1984b; 138(9):863-865.
    40) Crain EF, Gershel JC, & Mezey AP: Caustic ingestions: symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138:863-865.
    41) Crain EF, Gershel JC, & Mezey AP: Caustic ingestions; symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury. Am J Dis Child 1984a; 138:863-865.
    42) Dabadie A, Roussey M, & Oumman M: Ingestion accidentelle de caustiques chez l'enfant: a propos de 100 observations. Arch Fr Pediatr 1989; 46:217-222.
    43) Dascalescu C, Bulat C, Danila R, et al: Tailored surgical treatment for post-caustics stenosis of the upper digestive tract with complicated lesions. Clinical experience at our department in the last ten years. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2005; 109(1):77-81.
    44) Davis WM, Madden JW, & Peacock EE Jr: A new approach to the control of esophageal stenosis. Ann Surg 1972; 176:469-476.
    45) Dogan Y, Erkan T, Cokugras FC, et al: Caustic gastroesophageal lesions in childhood: an analysis of 473 cases. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2006; 45(5):435-438.
    46) Doo EY, Shin JH, Kim JH, et al: Oesophageal strictures caused by the ingestion of corrosive agents: effectiveness of balloon dilatation in children. Clin Radiol 2009; 64(3):265-271.
    47) Einhorn A, Horton L, & Altieri M: Serious respiratory consequences of detergent ingestions in children. Pediatrics 1989; 84:472-474.
    48) Endicott JN: Corrosive esophagitis: current management of the acute esophageal lye burn. South Med J 1971; 64:270-272.
    49) Ernst AA, Thomson T, & Haynes ML: Warmed versus room temperature saline solution for ocular irrigation: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32:676-679.
    50) Ertekin C, Alimoglu O, Akyildiz H, et al: The results of caustic ingestions. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51(59):1397-1400.
    51) Estrera A, Taylor W, & Mills LJ: Corrosive burns of the esophagus and stomach: a recommendation for an aggressive surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:276-283.
    52) Estrera A, Taylor W, & Mills LJ: Corrosive burns of the esophagus and stomach: a recommendation of an aggressive surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1986a; 41:276-283.
    53) Feldman M, Iben AB, & Hurley EJ: Corrosive injury to oro-pharynx and esophagus: eighty-five consecutive cases. West J Med 1973; 118:6-9.
    54) Feng Y, Feng Y, Zhu X, et al: Alkali burn causes aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 (ALDH3A1) decrease in mouse cornea. Mol Vis 2004; 10:845-850.
    55) Ferguson MK, Migliore M, & Staszak VM: Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury. Am J Surg 1989; 157:116-120.
    56) Ferguson MK, Migliore M, & Staszak VM: Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury. Am J Surg 1989a; 157:116-120.
    57) Fish R & Davidson RS: Management of ocular thermal and chemical injuries, including amniotic membrane therapy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21(4):317-321.
    58) Flowers MW: Burn hazard with cement (letter). Br Med J 1978; 1250.
    59) Forsen JW & Muntz HR: Hair relaxer ingestion: a new trend. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:781-784.
    60) Friedman EM: Caustic ingestions and foreign body aspirations: an overlooked form of child abuse. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96:709-712.
    61) Fulton JA & Hoffman RS : Steroids in second degree caustic burns of the esophagus: a systematic pooled analysis of fifty years of human data: 1956-2006. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2007; 45(4):402-408.
    62) Gandhi RP, Cooper A, & Barlow BA: Successful management of esophageal stricture without resection or replacement. J Pediatr 1989; 24:745-750.
    63) Gaudreault P, Parent M, & McGuigan MA: Predictability of esophageal injury from signs and symptoms: a study of 378 children. Pediatrics 1983; 71:761-770.
    64) Gaudreault P, Parent M, & McGuigan MA: Predictability of esophageal injury from signs and symptoms: a study of caustic ingestion in 378 children. Pediatrics 1983a; 71:761-770.
    65) Gaudreault P, Parent M, McGuigan MA, et al: Predictability of esophageal injury from signs and symptoms: a study of caustic ingestion in 378 children. Pediatrics 1983b; 71(5):767-770.
    66) Genieser & Becker: Clinitest strictures of the esophagus. Clin Pediatr 1969; 8:17A-19A.
    67) Gill RA, Pentel PR, & Merritt VE: Encapsulated alkali ingestion has a characteristic endoscopic appearance. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32:121-122.
    68) Gorman RL, Khin-Maung-Gyi MT, & Klein-Schwartz W: Initial symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury in alkaline corrosive ingestions. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:89-194.
    69) Gorman RL, Khin-Maung-Gyi MT, & Klein-Schwartz W: Initial symptoms as predictors of esophageal injury in alkaline corrosive ingestions. Am J Emerg Med 1992a; 10:89-94.
    70) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993a.
    71) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993b.
    72) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    73) Grenga TE: A new risk of lye ingestion by children. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:156-157.
    74) Gundogdu HZ, Tanyel FC, & Buyukpamukcu N: Conservative treatment of caustic esophageal strictures in children. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27:767-770.
    75) Gupta SK, Croffie JM, & Fitzgerald JF: Is esophagogastroduodenoscopy necessary in all caustic ingestions?. J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 32:50-53.
    76) Guth AA, Pachter HL, & Albanese C: Combined duodenal and colonic necrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994; 19:303-305.
    77) Haller JA & Bachman K: The comparative effect of current therapy on experimental caustic burns of the esophagus. Pediatrics 1964; 236-245.
    78) Haller JA, Andrews HG, & White JJ: Pathophysiology and management of acute corrosive burns of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 1971; 6:578-584.
    79) Hallock GG: Mechanisms of burn injury secondary to airbag deployment. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39(2):111-113.
    80) Hannuksela M, Suhonen R, & Karvonen J: Caustic ulcers caused by cement. Br J Dermatol 1976; 95:547-549.
    81) Hardin JC Jr: Caustic burns of esophagus: 10-year analysis. Am J Surg 1956; 91:742-748.
    82) Harper RD & Dickson WA: Mr Muscle oven cleaner - is he too strong for us?. Burns 1994; 20:336-339.
    83) Hawkins DB, Demeter MJ, & Barnett TE: Caustic ingestion: controversies in management. A review of 214 cases. Laryngoscope 1980; 90:98-109.
    84) Herbert K & Lawrence JC: Chemical burns. Burns 1989; 15:381-384.
    85) Herretes S, Suwan-Apichon O, Pirouzmanesh A, et al: Use of topical human amniotic fluid in the treatment of acute ocular alkali injuries in mice. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142(2):271-278.
    86) Hoffman RS, Howland MA, & Kamerow HN: Comparison of titratable acid/alkaline reserve and pH in potentially caustic household products. Clin Toxicol 1989; 27:241-261.
    87) Hogan RB & Polter DE: Nonsurgical management of lye-induced antral strictures with hydrostatic balloon dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32:228-230.
    88) Homan CS, Maitra SR, & Lane BP: Effectie treatment for acute alkali injury to th eesophagus using weak-acid neutralization therapy: an ex vivo study. Acad Emerg Med 1995a; 952-958.
    89) Homan CS, Maitra SR, & Lane BP: Effective treatment of acute alkali injury of the esopahgus with early saline dilution therapy. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:178-182.
    90) Homan CS, Maitra SR, & Lane BP: Histopathologic evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of water and mild dilution for esophageal acid injury. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2:587-591.
    91) Homan CS, Maitra SR, & Lane BP: Therapeutic effects of water and milk for acute alkali injury of the esophagus. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24:14-20.
    92) Homan CS, Maitra SR, & Lane BP: Therapeutic effects of water and milk for acute alkali injury of the esophagus. Ann Emerg Med 1994a; 24:14-19.
    93) Howell JM, Dalsey WC, & Hartsell FW: Steroids for the treatment of corrosive esophageal injury: a statistical analysis of past studies. Am J Emerg Med 1992; 10:421-425.
    94) Howell JM: Alkaline ingestions. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 15:820-825.
    95) Howell JM: Alkalinity of non-industrial cleaning products and the likelihood of producing significant esophageal burns. Am J Emerg Med 1991; 9:560-562.
    96) Huang YC, Ni YH, Lai HS, et al: Corrosive esophagitis in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20(3):207-210.
    97) Hughes WF Jr: Alkali burns of the eye I. Review of the literature and summary of present knowledge. Arch Ophthalmol 1946; 35:423-449.
    98) Huy PTB & Celerier M: Management of severe caustic stenosis of the hypopharynx and esophagus by ileocolic transposition via suprahyoid or transepiglottic approach. Ann Surg 1988; 207:439-445.
    99) Ikeda N, Hayasaka S, Hayasaka Y, et al: Alkali burns of the eye: effect of immediate copious irrigation with tap water on their severity. Ophthalmologica 2006; 220(4):225-228.
    100) Ingraham HJ, Perry HD, & Donnenfeld ED: Air-bag keratitis (letter). N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1599-1600.
    101) Isolauri J & Markkula H: Lye ingestion and carcinoma of the esophagus. Acta Chir Scand 1989; 155:269-271.
    102) Jaillard S, Nseir S, & Metois D: Extensive corrosive injuries of the upper airways and gastrointestinal tract. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123:186-188.
    103) Kamijo Y, Kondo I, & Soma K: Alkaline esophagitis evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Toxicol 2001; 39:623-625.
    104) Kamijo Y, Kondo I, Kokuto M, et al: Miniprobe ultrasonography for determining prognosis in corrosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(5):851-854.
    105) Kaya M, Inan M, & Bedel D: Detection of tracheoesophageal fistula caused by ingestion of a caustic substance by esophageal scintigraphy. Clin Nuclear Med 2005; 30(5):365-366.
    106) Keh SM, Onyekwelu N, McManus K, et al: Corrosive injury to upper gastrointestinal tract: Still a major surgical dilemma. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(32):5223-5228.
    107) Kersjes MP, Reifler DM, & Maurer JR: A review of chemical eye burns referred to the blodgett regional poison center. Vet Hum Toxicol 1987; 29:453-455.
    108) Kinnman J, Shin HJ, & Wetteland P: Carcinoma of the esophagus after lye corrosion. Report of a case in a 15 year old Korean male. Acta Chir Scand 1968; 134:489.
    109) Kirsh MM & Ritter F: Caustic ingestion and subsequent damage to the oropharyngeal and digestive passages. Ann Thorac Surg 1976; 21:74-82.
    110) Kiviranta UK: Korrosin des oesophagus und des ventrikels; ihe folgen und ihre behandlung. Acta Otolaryngol [suppl] 1950; 81:1-128.
    111) Knezevic JD , Radovanovic NS , Simic AP , et al: Colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal caustic strictures: 40 years of experience. Dis Esophagus 2007; 20(6):530-534.
    112) Knox WG, Scott JR, & Zintel HA: Bouginage and steroids used singly or in combination in experimental corrosive esophagitis. Ann Surg 1967; 166:930-941.
    113) Kochhar R, Sethy PK, Kochhar S, et al: Corrosive induced carcinoma of esophagus: report of three patients and review of literature. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21(4):777-780.
    114) Kua K, Jonas N, & O'Donnell R: The larynx and caustic soda ingestion. Arch Dis Child 2015; 100(6):570.
    115) Kuckelkorn R, Kottek A, & Schrage N: Poor prognosis of severe chemical and thermal eye burns: the need for adequate emergency care and primary prevention. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1995; 281-284.
    116) Kuhn JR & Tunell WP: The role of initial cineesophagography in casutic esophageal injury. Am J Surg 1983; 146:804-806.
    117) Lamireau T, Rebouissoux L, & Denis D: Accidental caustic ingestion in children: is endoscopy always mandatory?. J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2001; 33:81-84.
    118) Landau GD & Saunders WH: The effect of chlorine bleach on the esophagus. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80:174-176.
    119) Leape LL, Ashcraft AW, & Mann CM: Tracheal resection for lye stricture. Surg 1972; 72:357-360.
    120) Leape LL, Ashcraft AW, & Scarpelli DG: Hazard to health - liquid lye. N Engl J Med 1971; 284:578-581.
    121) Leape LL: New liquid lye drain cleaners. Clin Toxicol 1974; 7:109-114.
    122) Lemp MA: Cornea and sclera. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92:158-170.
    123) Little AG, Naunheim KS, & Ferguson MK: Surgical management of esophageal strictures. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45:144-147.
    124) LoVecchio F, Hamilton R, & Sturman K: A meta-analysis of the use of steroids in the prevention of stricture formation from second degree caustic burns of the esophagus (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1996; 35:579-580.
    125) Lorette JJ Jr & Wilkinson JA: Alkaline chemical burn to the face requiring full-thickness skin grafting. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:739-741.
    126) Lowe JE, Graham DY, & Boisaubin EV: Corrosive injury to the stomach: the natural history and role of fiberoptic endoscopy. Am J Surg 1979; 137:803.
    127) Mackenzie IJ: A denture-cleansing tablet swallowed (letter). Br Dent J 1982; 153:6-7.
    128) Makay O, Yukselen V, Vardar E, et al: Role of allopurinol on oxidative stress in caustic burn: cure for stricture?. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23(11):1105-1112.
    129) Makela JT, Laitinen S, & Salo JA: Corrosion injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract after swallowing strong alkali. Eur J Surg 1998; 164(8):575-580.
    130) Mamede RC & De Mello Filho FV: Treatment of caustic ingestion: an analysis of 239 cases. Dis Esophagus 2002; 15(3):210-213.
    131) Marshall F II: Caustic burns of the esophagus: ten year results of aggressive care. South Med J 1979; 72:1236-1237.
    132) Mattax JB & Mcculley JP: Corneal surgery following alkali burns. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1988; 28:76-82.
    133) Mauger T: Sodium hydroxide masquerading as a contact lens solution (letter). Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106:1037.
    134) Maull KI, Osman AP, & Maull CD: Liquid caustic ingestions: an in vitro study of the effects of buffer, neutralization, and dilution. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 4:1160-1162.
    135) McCabe RE, Scott JR, & Knox G: Fistulization between the esophagus, aorta and trachea as a complication of acute corrosive esophagitis: report of a case. Am Surg 1969; 35:450-454.
    136) McLaughlin RS: Chemical burns of the human cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1946; 29:1355-1362.
    137) Meller D, Pires RT, & Mack RJS: Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute chemical or thermal burns. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:980-990.
    138) Meredith JW, Kon ND, & Thompson JN: Management of injuries from liquid lye ingestion. J Trauma 1988; 28:1173-1180.
    139) Millar AJW, Numanoglu A, & Mann M: Detection of caustid oesophageal injury tiwh technetium 99m-labelled sucralfate. J Ped SUrg 2001; 36:262-265.
    140) Moazam F, Talbert JL, & Miller D: Caustic ingestion and its sequelae in children. South Med J 1987; 80:187-188.
    141) Moazam F, Talbert JL, & Miller D: Caustic ingestion and its sequelae in children. South Med J 1987a; 80:187-188.
    142) Moran KD, O'Reilly T, & Munster AM: Chemical burns: a ten-year experience. Am Surgeon 1987; 53:652-653.
    143) Morgan S & Murray A: Limbal autotransplantation in the acute and chronic phases of severe chemical injuries. Eye 1996; 10:349-354.
    144) Morgan SJ: Chemical burns of the eyes: causes and management. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71:854-857.
    145) Moulin D, Bertrand J-M, & Buts J-P: Upper airway lesions in children after accidental ingestion of caustic substances. J Pediatr 1985; 106:408-410.
    146) Mozingo DW, Smith AA, & McManus WF: Chemical burns. J Trauma 1988; 28:642-647.
    147) Mrvos R & Krenzelok EP: Hair relaxers: lack of morbidity despite high pH (letter). Am J Emerg Med 1997; 15:216.
    148) Mrvos R, Dean B, & Krenzelok E: Hair relaxers: lack of morbidity despite high pH (abstract). J Toxicol-Clin Toxicol 1995; 33:514.
    149) Muhlendahl KE, Oberdisse U, & Krienke EG: Local injuries by accidental ingestion of corrosive substances by children. Arch Toxicol 1978; 39:299-314.
    150) Nagi B, Kochhar R, Thapa BR, et al: Radiological spectrum of late sequelae of corrosive injury to upper gastrointestinal tract. A pictorial review. Acta Radiol 2004; 45(1):7-12.
    151) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program: Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120(5 Suppl):S94-S138.
    152) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    153) Nicholson AG, Harland CC, & Bull RH: Chemically induced cosmetic alopecia. Br J Dermatol 1993; 128:537-541.
    154) Nuutinen M, Uhari M, & Karvali T: Consequences of caustic ingestions in children. Acta Paediatr 1994; 83:1200-1205.
    155) Nuutinen M, Uhari M, & Karvali T: Consequences of caustic ingestions in children. Acta Paediatr 1994a; 83:1200-1205.
    156) O'Donoghue JM, Al-Ghazal SK, & McCann J: The need for early aggressive treatment of external alkali burns (letter). Irish J Med Sci 1994; 163:531.
    157) O'Grady TC: Mass eye casualties at sea. Mil Med 1989; 154:596-598.
    158) Oakes DD, Sherck JP, & Mark JBD: Lye ingestion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982a; 83:194-204.
    159) Oakes DD, Sherck JP, & Mark JBD: Lye ingestion: clinical patterns and therapeutic implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83:194.
    160) Okonek S, Bierbach H, & Atzpodien W: Unexpected metabolic acidosis in severe lye poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1981; 18:225-230.
    161) Palmer M, Hoffman RS, & White AB: A,B,Cs of caustic ingestions in suicidal adults. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49(2):246-247.
    162) Park SH, Park J, You KH, et al: Tetramethylammonium hydroxide poisoning during a pallet cleaning demonstration. J Occup Health 2013; 55(2):120-124.
    163) Patrick AW, Cameron EWJ, & Ford MJ: Oesophageal stricture following inadvertent ingestion of steradent tablets in the elderly. Scott Med J 1986; 31:181.
    164) Pelclova D & Navratil T: Do corticosteroids prevent oesophageal stricture after corrosive ingestion?. Toxicol Rev 2005; 24(2):125-129.
    165) Perry HD, Hodes LW, & Seedor JA: Effect of doxycycline hyclate on corneal epithelial wound healing in the rabbit alkali-burn model. Preliminary observations. Cornea 1993; 12:379-82.
    166) Pfister RR & Koski J: Alkali burns of the eye: pathophysiology and treatment. South Med J 1982; 75:417-422.
    167) Pfister RR, Friend J, & Dohlman CH: The anterior segments of rabbits after alkali burns. Arch Ophthalmol 1971; 86:189-193.
    168) Plumb J, Fenton SJ, Thomas R, et al: Severe Esophageal Stricture in an Infant after Ingestion of a Callus Remover Product (abstracts). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2015; 53(7):760.
    169) Poley JW, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, et al: Ingestion of acid and alkaline agents: outcome and prognostic value of early upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:372-377.
    170) Previtera C, Giusti F, & Guglielmi M: Predictive value of visible lesions (cheeks, lips, oropharynx) in suspected caustic ingestion: may endoscopy reasonably be omitted in completely negative pediatric patients?. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990; 6:176-178.
    171) Previtera C, Giusti F, & Gugliemi M: Predictive value of visible lesions (cheeks, lips, oropharynx) in suspected caustic ingestion: may endoscopy reasonably be omitted in completely negative pediatric patients?. Pediatr Emerg Care 1990a; 6:176-178.
    172) Promisloff RA, Phan A, & Lenchner GS: Reactive airway dysfunction syndrome in three police officers following a roadside chemical spill. Chest 1990; 98:928-929.
    173) Rabinovitz M, Udekwu AO, & Campbell WL: Tracheoesophageal-aortic fistula complicating lye ingestion. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:868-871.
    174) Rana SV, Kochhar R, Pal R, et al: Orocecal transit time in patients in the chronic phase of corrosive injury. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53(7):1797-1800.
    175) Rao RB & Hoffman RS: Caustics and Batteries, in Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (eds): Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    176) Rao RB & Hoffman RS: Caustics and Batteries. In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA et al (Eds): Toxicologic Emergencies, 6th ed, Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT, 1998, pp 1399-1427.
    177) Rauch DA: Hair relaxer misuse: don't relax. Pediatrics 2000; 105:1154-1155.
    178) Reyes HM, Lin CY, & Schluhk FF: Experimental treatment of corrosive esophageal burns. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9:317-327.
    179) Rihawi S, Frentz M, & Schrage NF: Emergency treatment of eye burns: which rinsing solution should we choose?. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 244(7):845-854.
    180) Ronk JF, Ruiz-Esmenjaud S, & Osorio M: Limbal conjunctival autograft in subacute alkaline corneal burn. Cornea 1994; 13:465-468.
    181) Roper-Hall MJ: Thermal and chemical burns. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1965; 85:631.
    182) Rosenberg N, Kunderman PJ, & Vroman L: Prevention of experimental esophageal stricture by cortisone II. Arch Surg 1953; 66:593-598.
    183) Rozenbaum D, Baruchin AM, & Dafna Z: Chemical burns of the eye with special reference to alkali burns. Burns 1991; 17:136-140.
    184) Rubin AE, Bentur L, & Bentur Y: Obstructive airway disease associated with occupational sodium hydroxide inhalation. Br J Ind Med 1992; 49:213-214.
    185) Rubin MM, Jui V, & Cozzi GM: Treatment of caustic ingestion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47:286-288.
    186) Rumack BH & Burrington JD: Caustic ingestions: a rational look at diluents. Clin Toxicol 1977a; 11:27-34.
    187) Rumack BH & Burrington JD: Caustic ingestions: a rational look at diluents. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1977; 11:27-34.
    188) Ryan F, Witherow H, Mirza J, et al: The oral implications of caustic soda ingestion in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101(1):29-34.
    189) Saari KM, Leinonen J, & Aine E: Management of chemical eye injuries with prolonged irrigation. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1984; 52-59.
    190) Saedi S, Nyhus LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973a; 39:465-469.
    191) Saedi S, Nyhust LM, & Gabrys BF: Pharmacological prevention of esophageal stricture: an experimental study in the cat. Am Surg 1973; 39:465-469.
    192) Sagi A, Bibi C, & Meir PB: Skin injury following contact with a complex amine. Burns 1988; 14:495-496.
    193) Saini JS & Sharma A: ocular chemical burns - clinical and demographic profile. Burns 1993; 19:67-69.
    194) Sarfati E, Gossot D, & Assens P: Management of caustic ingestion in adults. Br J Surg 1987; 74:146-148.
    195) Sawhney CP & Kaushish R: Acid and alkali burns: considerations in management. Burns 1989; 15:132-134.
    196) Saydjari R, Abston S, & Desai MH: Chemical burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1986; 7:404-408.
    197) Schier JG, Hoffman RS, & Nelson LS: Desiccant induced gastrointestinal burns (abstract). Clin Toxicol 2002; 40:627-628.
    198) Schild JA: Caustic ingestion in adult patients. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:1199-1201.
    199) Scott JC, Jones B, & Eisele DW: Caustic ingestion injuries of the upper aerodigestive tract. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:1-8.
    200) Seedor JA, Perry HD, & McNamara TF: Systemic tetracycline treatment of alkali-induced corneal ulceration in rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105:268-271.
    201) Sellars SL & Spence RAJ: Chemical burns of the oesophagus. J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101:1211-1213.
    202) Semaan A, Klein T, Vahdad MR, et al: Severe Vaginal Burns in a 5-Year-Old Girl Due to an Alkaline Battery in the Vagina. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28(5):e147-e148.
    203) Simpson JS, Ruff T, & Fearon B: Esophageal perforation during esophagoscopy in children. Ann Otol, Rhinol, Laryngol 1974; 83:725-728.
    204) Singer A, Sagi A, & Ben Meir P: Chemical burns: our 10-year experience. Burns 1992; 18:250-252.
    205) Singh AK, Kothawla LK, & Karlson KE: Tracheoesophageal and aortoesophageal fistulae complicating corrosive esophagitis. Chest 1976; 70:549-551.
    206) Singh P, Tyagi M, Kumar Y, et al: Ocular chemical injuries and their management. Oman J Ophthalmol 2013; 6(2):83-86.
    207) Smilkstein MJ & Fraunfelder F: Ophthalmic Principles, In: Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2002.
    208) Spector J & Fernandez WG: Chemical, thermal, and biological ocular exposures. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2008; 26(1):125-136.
    209) Sperling HV & Wheeler MJ: An unusual complication of lye ingestion. JAMA 1974; 228:871.
    210) Sridhar MS, Bansal AK, & Sangwan VS: Amniotic membrans transplantation in acute chemical and thermal injury. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130:134-137.
    211) Stefanidou M, Georgiou M, & Koupparis M: Acute poisoning due to alkalis used during industrial cleaning of soft drinks' glass containers: a case report. Vet Human Toxicol 1997; 39:308-310.
    212) Su CY & Lin CP: Combined use of an amniotic membrane and tissue adhesive in treating corneal perforation: a case report. Ophtalmic Sufr Lasers 2000; 31:151-154.
    213) Sugawa C & Lucas CE: Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: a clinical and endoscopic study. Surgery 1989; 106:802-807.
    214) Swanson-Biearman B, Mrvos R, & Dean BS: Air bags: lifesaving with toxic potential (Abstract)?. Vet Hum Toxicol 1991; 33:372.
    215) Swanson-Biearman B, Mrvos R, & Dean BS: Air bags: lifesaving with toxic potential ? (Abstract). Vet Human Toxicol 1991a; 33:372.
    216) Swanson-Biearman B, Mrvos R, Dean BS, et al: Air bags: lifesaving with toxic potential?. Am J Emerg Med 1993; 11:38-39.
    217) Symbas PN, Vlasis SE, & Hatcher CR Jr: Esophagitis secondary to ingestion of caustic material. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36:73-77.
    218) Takato T, Ohsone H, & Tsukakoshi H: Treatment of severe microstomia caused by swallowing of caustic soda. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67:20-24.
    219) Testud F, Voegtle R, & Nordmann JP: Severe ocular burns by calcium carbide in a speleologist: a case report. J Fr Ophthalmol 2002; 25:308-311.
    220) Tran Ba Huy P & Celerier M: Management of severe caustic stenosis of the hypopharynx and esophagus by ileocolic transposition via suprahyoid or transepiglottic approach. Annals of Surgery 1988; 207:439-445.
    221) Treem WR, Long WR, & Friedman D: Successful management of an acquired gastric outlet obstruction with endoscopy guided balloon dilatation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1987; 6:992-996.
    222) Tuft SJ & Shortt AJ: Surgical rehabilitation following severe ocular burns. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23(10):1966-1971.
    223) Turner A & Robinson P: Respiratory and gastrointestinal complications of caustic ingestion in children. Emerg Med J 2005; 22:359-361.
    224) Uhde GI: Chemical burns of the esophagus. J Oto Rhinol Laryngol 1946; 55:795-819.
    225) Vancura EM, Clinton JE, & Ruiz E: Toxicity of alkaline solutions. Ann Emerg Med 1980; 9:118-112.
    226) Varkey P, Tan NC, & Chen H: Corrosive injury of oral cavity--a rare presentation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59(10):1110-1113.
    227) Vergauwen P, moulin D, & Buts J-P: Caustic burns of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts. Eur J Pediatr 1991; 150:700-703.
    228) Vergauwen p, Moulin D, & Buts JP: Caustic burns of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts. Eur J Pediatr 1991a; 150:700-703.
    229) Vilogi J, Whitehead B, & Marcus SM: Oven-cleaner pads: new risk for corrosive injury. Am J Emerg Med 1985; 3:412-414.
    230) Viscomi GJ, Beekhuis GJ, & Whitten CF: An evaluation of early esophagoscopy and corticosteroid therapy in the management of corrosive injury of the esophagus. J Pediatr 1961; 59:356-360.
    231) Waldron DJ & Fitzgerald RJ: Oesophageal burns in childhood: the importance of early oesophagoscopy (letter). Irish J Med Sci 1987; 156:161.
    232) Warren JB, Griffin DJ, & Olson RC: Urine sugar reagent tablet ingestion causing gastric and duodenal ulceration. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144:161-162.
    233) Welsh JJ & Welsh LW: Endoscopic examination of corrosive injuries of the uppergastrointestinal tract. Laryngoscope 1978; 88:1300-1309.
    234) White JE, McClafferty K, & Orton RB: Ocular alkalie burn associated with automobile air-bag activation. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153:933-934.
    235) Wijburg FA, Beukers MM, & Heymans HS: Nasogastric intubation as sole treatment of caustic esophageal lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94:337-341.
    236) Wijburg FA, Heymans HS, & Urbanus NA: Caustic esophageal lesions in childhood: prevention of stricture formation. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24(2):171-173.
    237) Winder C: Medical treatment of caustic burns (letter). Med J Aust 1997; 167:511-512.
    238) Winek CL, Wahba WW, & Huston RM: Chemical burn from alkaline batteries - a case report. For Sci Intl 1999; 100:101-104.
    239) Wolpowitz A: Alkali and acid ingestion (letter). SA Med J 1974; 2615-2616.
    240) Wu MH & Lai WW: Surgical management of extensive corrosive injuries of the alimentary tract. Surg Gynecol Obstetr 1993; 177:12-16.
    241) Yanturali S, Yaka E, & Ersoy G: Chemical injury to the tongue following contact with sodium hydroxide drain cleaner. Vet Human Toxicol 2004; 46:319-321.
    242) Yarington CT & Heatly CA: Steroids, antibiotics, and early esophagoscopy in caustic esophageal trauma. N Y State J Med 1963; 63:2960-2963.
    243) Yarington CT, Bales GA, & Frazer JP: A study of the management of caustic esophageal trauma. Ann Otol Rhin & Laryng 1964; 73:1130-1135.
    244) Yukselen V, Karaoglu AO, Yenisey C, et al: Trimetazidine reduces the degree of fibrosis in alkali burns of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40(3):505-509.
    245) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Mehta S: The role of fiberoptic endoscopy in the management of corrosive ingestion and modified endoscopic classification of burns. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:165-169.
    246) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Mehta S: The role of fiberoptic endoscopy in the management of corrosive ingestion and modified endoscopic classification of burns. Gastrointest Endoscopy 1991a; 37:165-169.
    247) Zargar SA, Kochhar R, & Nagi B: Ingestion of corrosive acids: spectrum of injury to upper gastrointestinal tract and natural history. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:702-707.
    248) da Fonseca J, Brito MJ, & Freitas J: Acute colitis caused by caustic products. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:2601-2602.
    249) van Heijst ANP: The problem of the corrosiveness of products - a pilot study with a denture cleaner. Human Toxicol 1983; 2:339-344.