MOBILE VIEW  | 

CHLOROFORM

Classification   |    Detailed evidence-based information

Therapeutic Toxic Class

    A) Chloroform is a halogenated inhalational anesthetic that is currently rarely used due to its hepatotoxicity and cardiac depressant effects.

Specific Substances

    1) Trichloromethane
    2) Chlorof
    3) Chloroformum
    4) Chloroformium Anesthesicum
    5) Chloroformum Narcosi
    6) Molecular Formula: C-H-Cl3
    7) CAS 67-66-3
    8) CHLOROFORMIO (ITALIAN)
    9) TRICHLOROMETANO (ITALIAN)
    10) TRICHLOROORMETHAAN (DUTCH)
    1.2.1) MOLECULAR FORMULA
    1) CHCl3

Available Forms Sources

    A) SOURCES
    1) Chloroform is made from: acetone and bleaching powder by the addition of sulfuric acid; natural gas plus hydrogen chloride and anhydrous oxygen; hypochloride and aldehyde; methyl chloride plus chlorine; the reaction of chlorinated lime with acetone, acetaldehyde, or ethanol; or the chlorination of methane as a by-product(Ashford, 1994; Budavari, 1996; Lewis, 1997; Lewis, 1998).
    B) USES
    1) Chloroform is used in the production of chlorodifluoromethane and fluoropolymers; as a solvent for alkaloids, fats, fixed and volatile oils, gulta-percha, and resins; in fire extinguishers as a heat-transfer medium; in analytical chemistry; in fumigants and insecticides; and in the rubber industry (ACGIH, 1991; Bingham et al, 2001; Budavari, 1996; Lewis, 1997; Lewis, 1998; Reynolds, 1982).
    2) Chloroform was introduced in 1847 as an inhalant anesthetic (Dykes, 1970). FDA ban prohibits the use of chloroform in cosmetics and medicines as a result of reported carcinogenicity in animals (JEF Reynolds , 1998).
    3) Applied topically, chloroform has a rubefacient action. It may be found in linaments as a counter irritant (JEF Reynolds , 1998).
    4) Applied topically in a clinical controlled study (n=41), chloroform reduced the time for scab formation when compared to placebo for herpes labialis (Reynolds, 1982).
    5) Cholesterol gallstones have been successfully removed by instilling 5 mL chloroform at a temperature of 40 degrees C (Reynolds, 1982).
    6) Hermann's Mixture containing 3 g chloroform, 2 g oil of eucalyptus, and 40 g castor oil was described in 1911 for the treatment of hookworm infestation (Dykes, 1970).

Life Support

    A) This overview assumes that basic life support measures have been instituted.

Clinical Effects

    0.2.1) SUMMARY OF EXPOSURE
    A) USES: Chloroform is a halogenated hydrocarbon. Historically, it had been used as an inhaled anesthetic; however, it is not currently used clinically for this indication due to cardiotoxic and hepatotoxic effects. Rarely, it is used recreationally as an inhalant. Currently, chloroform is used commonly in industrial processes as a precursor for chemical production, as a solvent, in chemical fire extinguishers, in analytical chemistry, in fumigants and insecticides, and in the rubber industry.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Chloroform toxicity occurs most commonly due to CNS depressant effects; as an inhaled anesthetic it causes inebriation, respiratory depression and hypoxia. The cardiotoxic effects due to chloroform are somewhat unclear in etiology, but are thought to be at least in part due to sensitization of the myocardium to catecholamines, leading to risk for developing dysrhythmias. The mechanism of chloroform-induced hepatic and renal toxicity is thought to be due to its toxic metabolites. The cytochrome system (unclear which isoenzymes) oxidizes chloroform to chloromethanol, which rapidly and spontaneously dechlorinates to create hydrochloric acid and phosgene. Phosgene in turn reacts with water to produce carbon dioxide and chloride ions and, with glutathione, to produce diglutathionyl dithiocarbonate. When glutathione is depleted to a critical level in the liver and kidney, excess phosgene covalently binds to tissue macromolecules, resulting in hepatic and renal necrosis.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Poisoning is rare and most often occurs by the inhalational route, although intentional ingestions have been reported.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Common symptoms include nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, and nose and throat irritation.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Common severe symptoms include CNS depression, myocardial depression, cardiac dysrhythmias, hypotension, respiratory depression, renal failure, hepatotoxicity, anoxia, and death. Dry mouth, hyperthermia, ataxia, chemical pneumonitis, dyspnea, delayed pulmonary edema, ARDS, hemolytic anemia, and leukocytosis may also be seen. Patients with chronic inhalational abuse may develop hallucinations, psychotic behavior, and white-matter degeneration.
    3) DERMAL EXPOSURE: Dermal contact results in irritation, reddening, burning pain, urticaria, vesiculation, and dermatitis via defatting.
    4) EYE EXPOSURE: Eye exposure to either the liquid or vapor forms of chloroform may cause conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, burning pain, and corneal epithelial injury.
    0.2.3) VITAL SIGNS
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypotension and elevated temperature may be seen.
    0.2.20) REPRODUCTIVE
    A) Chloroform may be embryotoxic and induce changes in sperm morphology.
    B) Chloroform has been listed by one reviewer as possibly teratogenic in humans (Hoffman, 1983), but the basis for this classification is not clear.
    0.2.21) CARCINOGENICITY
    A) Chloroform is listed as a suspected carcinogen.

Laboratory Monitoring

    A) Monitor CBC with differential, INR and PT/PTT, renal function, and liver enzymes in patients with significant exposure.
    B) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    C) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.
    D) Patients with significant respiratory symptoms should have a chest x-ray to evaluate for pulmonary edema or ARDS.
    E) Patients with a chloroform ingestion should have an abdominal radiograph performed to determine if there remains a large amount of radiopaque liquid that may be removed by decontamination (eg, NG aspiration) procedures.
    F) Chloroform concentrations are not readily available and are unlikely to be useful for clinical management of patients.

Treatment Overview

    0.4.2) ORAL/PARENTERAL EXPOSURE
    A) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat ventricular dysrhythmias using standard ACLS protocols. Chloroform may sensitize the myocardium to catecholamines. Epinephrine and other sympathomimetics should be used with caution as ventricular dysrhythmias may be precipitated. Renal failure may require renal replacement therapy. Hepatic injury may be treated with N-acetylcysteine with a similar protocol to that used for acetaminophen toxicity. Rarely, hemolysis may require treatment with packed red blood cell transfusions.
    C) DECONTAMINATION
    1) PREHOSPITAL: Gastrointestinal decontamination for chloroform ingestion is not recommended due to the potential for GI irritation, abrupt onset of CNS depression, and the risk for aspiration.
    2) HOSPITAL: GI decontamination for a chloroform ingestion is not routinely recommended due to the potential for GI irritation, abrupt onset of CNS depression, and the risk for aspiration. For patients with evidence of a large life-threatening ingestion (eg, large volume of radiopaque chloroform seen in stomach on abdominal x-ray), NG tube aspiration may be considered only after the airway has been protected.
    D) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with significant CNS depression or respiratory depression may require intubation; consider using lung-protective ventilator settings given the risk for ARDS.
    E) ANTIDOTE
    1) There is no specific antidote for chloroform toxicity. Some sources have suggested the use of N-acetylcysteine to prevent or treat hepatotoxicity. No data on clinical efficacy exist; however, in cases at risk for increased morbidity and mortality, it is generally considered to be a rational approach to therapy as there is minimal risk with administration and possible benefit.
    F) DYSRHYTHMIAS
    1) Initiate ACLS protocols. Chloroform may sensitize the myocardium to catecholamines. Epinephrine and other sympathomimetics should be used with caution as ventricular dysrhythmias may be precipitated.
    G) ENHANCED ELIMINATION
    1) Hemodialysis has not been shown to enhance chloroform elimination; however, it may be necessary to treat renal failure in severe cases.
    H) PATIENT DISPOSITION
    1) HOME CRITERIA: Asymptomatic patients with only a minimal exposure may be monitored at home.
    2) OBSERVATION CRITERIA: Any patient with ingestion of more than a minimal amount of chloroform or symptoms after inhalational exposure should be referred to a healthcare facility for evaluation and monitoring.
    3) ADMISSION CRITERIA: Patients with a significant exposure should be admitted for cardiovascular monitoring and monitored for delayed pulmonary, hepatic, and renal toxicity.
    4) CONSULT CRITERIA: Consult a toxicologist for any patient with symptomatic toxicity. Consult a nephrologist for patients with evidence of renal failure. Consult an ophthalmologist for patients with a significant ocular exposure.
    I) PITFALLS
    1) Failure to anticipate delayed hepatic, renal, and pulmonary toxicity.
    J) TOXICOKINETICS
    1) Chloroform is readily absorbed through both inhalation and ingestion. It is highly soluble in adipose tissue, and has a volume of distribution of 2.6 L/kg. Metabolites include chlormethanol, hydrochloric acid, phosgene, chloride, carbon dioxide, and diglutathionyl dithiocarbonate. It is excreted primarily by the lungs with 43% exhaled unchanged and 4% to 5% exhaled as carbon dioxide. A small proportion of metabolites are excreted renally. The average elimination half-life of orally ingested chloroform is approximately 1.5 hours.
    0.4.3) INHALATION EXPOSURE
    A) Patients with an inhalational exposure should be removed to fresh air.
    0.4.4) EYE EXPOSURE
    A) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, the patient should be seen in a healthcare facility.
    0.4.5) DERMAL EXPOSURE
    A) OVERVIEW
    1) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and jewelry and place them in plastic bags. Wash exposed areas with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes with gentle sponging to avoid skin breakdown. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    2) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive; there is no specific antidote. In substantial exposure, patients should be admitted and observed for several days for possible delayed toxicity. Monitor liver and kidney function. Monitor fluid and electrolyte status.
    3) Chloroform may be absorbed through the skin. Observe patient for delayed toxicity.

Range Of Toxicity

    A) TOXICITY: Concentrations of chloroform used for the induction of anesthesia range from 20,000 to 40,000 ppm for brief periods; exposure to these concentrations for a longer duration of time is life-threatening. Exposure to 14,000 ppm becomes dangerous to life at 1 hour of exposure. Death due to CNS depression may result with acute ingestion of as little as 10 mL, with the average oral lethal dose estimated to be 0.5 to 5 g/kg.

Summary Of Exposure

    A) USES: Chloroform is a halogenated hydrocarbon. Historically, it had been used as an inhaled anesthetic; however, it is not currently used clinically for this indication due to cardiotoxic and hepatotoxic effects. Rarely, it is used recreationally as an inhalant. Currently, chloroform is used commonly in industrial processes as a precursor for chemical production, as a solvent, in chemical fire extinguishers, in analytical chemistry, in fumigants and insecticides, and in the rubber industry.
    B) TOXICOLOGY: Chloroform toxicity occurs most commonly due to CNS depressant effects; as an inhaled anesthetic it causes inebriation, respiratory depression and hypoxia. The cardiotoxic effects due to chloroform are somewhat unclear in etiology, but are thought to be at least in part due to sensitization of the myocardium to catecholamines, leading to risk for developing dysrhythmias. The mechanism of chloroform-induced hepatic and renal toxicity is thought to be due to its toxic metabolites. The cytochrome system (unclear which isoenzymes) oxidizes chloroform to chloromethanol, which rapidly and spontaneously dechlorinates to create hydrochloric acid and phosgene. Phosgene in turn reacts with water to produce carbon dioxide and chloride ions and, with glutathione, to produce diglutathionyl dithiocarbonate. When glutathione is depleted to a critical level in the liver and kidney, excess phosgene covalently binds to tissue macromolecules, resulting in hepatic and renal necrosis.
    C) EPIDEMIOLOGY: Poisoning is rare and most often occurs by the inhalational route, although intentional ingestions have been reported.
    D) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY: Common symptoms include nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, fatigue, headache, and nose and throat irritation.
    2) SEVERE TOXICITY: Common severe symptoms include CNS depression, myocardial depression, cardiac dysrhythmias, hypotension, respiratory depression, renal failure, hepatotoxicity, anoxia, and death. Dry mouth, hyperthermia, ataxia, chemical pneumonitis, dyspnea, delayed pulmonary edema, ARDS, hemolytic anemia, and leukocytosis may also be seen. Patients with chronic inhalational abuse may develop hallucinations, psychotic behavior, and white-matter degeneration.
    3) DERMAL EXPOSURE: Dermal contact results in irritation, reddening, burning pain, urticaria, vesiculation, and dermatitis via defatting.
    4) EYE EXPOSURE: Eye exposure to either the liquid or vapor forms of chloroform may cause conjunctivitis, blepharospasm, burning pain, and corneal epithelial injury.

Vital Signs

    3.3.1) SUMMARY
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Hypotension and elevated temperature may be seen.
    3.3.3) TEMPERATURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Elevated temperature has been reported in delayed chloroform poisoning (Crawford, 1942).
    3.3.4) BLOOD PRESSURE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) HYPOTENSION may occur (JEF Reynolds , 1998).
    3.3.5) PULSE
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) Tachycardia (130 bpm) was reported in a 20-year-old woman who intentionally ingested approximately 100 mL of chloroform (Choi et al, 2006).

Heent

    3.4.3) EYES
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) High concentrations of vapor may produce conjunctival irritation (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    2) BLEPHAROSPASM may occur from exposure to high concentrations of vapor (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    3) Chloroform liquid splashed into the eye may produce immediate burning pain and conjunctivitis. Corneal epithelium injury with prompt regeneration (1 to 3 days) has been reported (Hathaway et al, 1996; Grant & Schuman, 1993).
    4) Chloroform induced moderate eye irritation in the rabbit in the Standard Draize Test (RTECS , 1999).
    3.4.6) THROAT
    A) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    1) DRY MOUTH and thirst have occurred from occupational exposure (Harbison, 1998).

Cardiovascular

    3.5.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CONDUCTION DISORDER OF THE HEART
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) CASE SERIES: Orth et al (1951) reported cardiac dysrhythmias in 45 of 52 patients observed during chloroform anesthesia.
    1) Dysrhythmias included atrial block, atrial extrasystoles, atrial rhythm, SA block, SA extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation, ventricular extrasystoles, bradycardia, bundle branch block, ventricular tachycardia, and cardiac arrest (Orth & Cohen, 1951).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Electrocardiographic changes and death have been reported in workers exposed to chloroform (Reichenbach, 1985).
    B) HEART FAILURE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old woman died approximately one hour after inhaling chloroform. The patient had been inhaling chloroform once or twice per month for approximately seven years. An autopsy of the patient showed pulmonary edema with focal bleeding and focal fragmentation and waviness of myocardial cells. Based on these findings, acute heart failure possibly precipitated by dysrhythmias or cardiac depression due to chloroform inhalation, was determined to be the cause of death (Harada et al, 1997).
    C) HYPOTENSIVE EPISODE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman with a history of alcohol misuse presented to the emergency department unresponsive (Glasgow Coma Scale of 5) with dyspnea and cyanosis. Vital signs indicated hypotension (80/50 mmHg) and tachycardia (120 beats/min), and an initial blood gas measurement demonstrated respiratory acidosis. A urinalysis showed proteinuria and the presence of brown casts and uric acid crystals. Within 20 hours postpresentation, following supportive care, the patient was awake and alert. Interview of the patient revealed that she had daily chloroform inhalations for the last 6 days and prior to presentation, had combined chloroform inhalation with consumption of 450 mL of vodka. On hospital day 2 (27 hours post-exposure), laboratory data revealed elevated serum creatinine, BUN, and liver enzyme concentrations. Despite continuous supportive treatment, the patient's condition progressively deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, fulminant hepatic failure, acute renal failure, encephalopathy, and cardiac arrest resulting in death approximately 78 hours postexposure. A postmortem examination revealed microvesicular hepatic steatosis and tubular renal necrosis (Lionte, 2010).

Respiratory

    3.6.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) PNEUMONITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Pulmonary infiltrates and acute respiratory distress developed in a 21-year-old man following intravenous injection (antecubital vein) of 5 mL of reagent grade chloroform.
    1) The patient had not vomited and a chest x-ray performed 2 months previously was normal. Tracheal intubation was not necessary. Improvement was noted initially on day 3 following exposure. Chest x-ray on day 5 showed improvement. Nearly total clearing was reported on day 19 (Timms & Moser, 1975).
    B) ACUTE RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Respiratory depression is common (JEF Reynolds , 1998; Boyer et al, 1998).
    C) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Pulmonary edema was a reported finding on autopsy of a pair of twins and in a 39-year-old woman found dead after apparently inhaling chloroform (Giusti & Chiarotti, 1981; Harada et al, 1997).
    D) HYPOVENTILATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Stupor and hypoventilation, requiring intubation, developed in a 38-year-old man after ingestion of 230 mL of chloroform. Treatment included aggressive gastric decontamination and administration of oral N-acetylcysteine. Two days later, the patient was extubated without sequelae (Boyer et al, 1998).

Neurologic

    3.7.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEFICIT
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Following ingestion, the chloroform intoxicated patient quickly becomes unconscious and remains that way for many hours (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010; Kim, 2008; Choi et al, 2006; Boyer et al, 1998; Harada et al, 1997). This may be followed by a phase of apparent recovery where the patient is awake and alert. Some patients may then deteriorate and die secondary to liver failure (Dykes, 1970).
    b) CASE REPORT: A suicidal 33-year-old woman became unconscious after self-injecting 0.5 mL of chloroform intravenously. She awoke the next morning and ingested approximately 120 mL of chloroform. The patient then became unconscious, awoke several hours later, vomited, then became unconscious again. After presenting to the emergency department, the patient was awake and alert. The patient remained asymptomatic after treatment with hyperbaric oxygen, cimetidine, and N-acetylcysteine (Rao et al, 1993).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman with a history of alcohol misuse presented to the emergency department unresponsive (Glasgow Coma Scale of 5) with dyspnea and cyanosis. Vital signs indicated hypotension and tachycardia, and an initial blood gas measurement demonstrated respiratory acidosis. A urinalysis showed proteinuria and the presence of brown casts and uric acid crystals. Within 20 hours postpresentation, following supportive care, the patient was awake and alert. Interview of the patient revealed that she had daily chloroform inhalations for the last 6 days and prior to presentation, had combined chloroform inhalation with consumption of 450 mL of vodka. On hospital day 2 (27 hours post-exposure), laboratory data revealed elevated serum creatinine, BUN, and liver enzyme concentrations. Despite continuous supportive treatment, the patient's condition progressively deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, fulminant hepatic failure, acute renal failure, encephalopathy, and cardiac arrest resulting in death approximately 78 hours postexposure. A postmortem examination revealed microvesicular hepatic steatosis and tubular renal necrosis (Lionte, 2010).
    B) DIZZINESS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Dizziness and a sensation of fainting may occur from an acute exposure to chloroform (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    C) HEADACHE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Headache, disorientation, fatigue, and mental dullness have been noted (Hathaway et al, 1996; Plunkett, 1976).
    D) LOSS OF APPETITE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Anorexia may occur (Plunkett, 1976).
    E) SUBSTANCE ABUSE
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hallucinations, dysarthria, ataxia, degenerative changes of the brain and psychotic behavior have been reported from chronic abuse (Baselt, 1995; Heilbrunn et al, 1945; EPA, 1985).

Gastrointestinal

    3.8.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) GASTROENTERITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chloroform may produce symptoms resembling gastroenteritis which is thought to be due to the irritant effects of the liquid on mucous membranes (Schroeder, 1965).
    B) NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Persistent nausea, vomiting and diarrhea may occur (Schroeder, 1965; Hakim et al, 1992).

Hepatic

    3.9.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEPATIC NECROSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatocellular toxicity may occur 10 to 48 hours postexposure. The patient may appear jaundiced and may have an enlarged liver. Liver enzyme and bilirubin levels may be noted to rise. Good supportive care over the next few days to weeks may lead to complete recovery (Schroeder, 1965; Rao et al, 1993; Boyer et al, 1998).
    b) CASE SERIES: Liver atrophy was reported in 2 women given chloroform during premature termination of pregnancy (Townsend, 1939).
    B) STEATOSIS OF LIVER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Fatty degeneration of the liver has been reported in industrial exposed workers (NIOSH, 1974).
    C) LARGE LIVER
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Hepatomegaly or other signs of liver injury may be observed (Hathaway et al, 1996; Hakim et al, 1992).
    b) Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly have also been reported (NIOSH, 1974).
    D) TOXIC HEPATITIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) COMBINATION INGESTION: A 23-year-old man presented with altered mental status 30 minutes after ingesting approximately half of the content of a 250-mL bottle of chloroform and dichloromethane. On day 2, laboratory results revealed elevated liver enzymes which reached peak levels on post-ingestion day 5. He experienced jaundice, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and general weakness 3 days post-ingestion. Abdominal CT revealed severe fatty infiltration of the liver parenchyma. Following supportive care, he gradually recovered and was discharged 2 weeks after ingestion. His liver enzymes levels returned to almost the reference range 4 weeks later (Kim, 2008).
    1) It is suggested that the mechanism of hepatic injury is induced by toxic metabolites by 2 hepatic pathways, cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism and glutathione S-transferase (GST)-dependent. Phosgene, a main hepatotoxic metabolite, and hydrochloric acid are produced from chloroform by the oxidative cytochrome P-450 pathway. In addition, this pathway produces carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide (via formyl chloride) from dichloromethane. The glutathione pathway produces a glutathione conjugate and formaldehyde and subsequently carbon dioxide (Kim, 2008).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old woman developed nausea, vomiting, anorexia, yellow ocular discoloration and mild fever eleven days after ingestion of chloroform. Examination revealed jaundice and hepatomegaly and an abdominal sonography showed altered echotexture of the liver (Hakim et al, 1992).
    c) CASE REPORT: Acute hepatitis with encephalopathy was reported in a 24-year-old woman who was a laboratory worker in a meat processing plant that utilized chloroform for extraction of residual antibiotics in meat. At hospital admission, she was comatose and her liver enzymes had reached peak levels (AST 4640 units/liter, ALT 3110 units/liter). The patient recovered with normalization of her liver enzyme levels following several treatments of plasmapheresis. Investigation of the patient's workplace revealed that she had been exposed to high levels of chloroform (more than 15 ppm) for two weeks due to malfunctioning of a chemical extraction hood used to collect and expel chloroform vapor (Lin et al, 2005).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 3-day history of nausea, vomiting, and malaise. At presentation, he appeared jaundice and had a partial thickness burn on his right shoulder, covering approximately 3% body surface area. His urine was also dark in color. Blood tests were consistent with a diagnosis of acute hepatitis. An abdominal ultrasound indicated hepatic steatosis. Interview of the patient revealed that, 3 days prior to presentation, he had been working with chloroform and had spilled 100 mL on his shoulder, with duration of exposure approximately 30 minutes before washing off the area. The area began to desquamate the next day, but was not painful. At the hospital, the patient's transaminase and bilirubin concentrations improved 12 hours after beginning N-acetylcysteine therapy. The patient was discharged 4 days post-admission. Follow-up 8 weeks later reported normalization of his transaminase concentrations, and a repeat abdominal ultrasound was also normal (Vlad et al, 2014).
    E) LIVER ENZYMES ABNORMAL
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman was found unresponsive one hour after intentionally ingesting an unknown substance. An empty 100-mL bottle was found and her partner reported that the patient had purchased a bottle of chloroform several days earlier. Upon presentation to the emergency department, the patient was tachycardic (130 bpm) with no spontaneous respiration and in a deep coma, necessitating mechanical ventilation. Initial arterial blood gas measurements indicated respiratory acidosis which improved following mechanical ventilation. An abdominal radiograph revealed a radiopaque material in the small bowel, believed to be chloroform. Three days following ingestion, the patient's prothrombin time peaked at 18.4 seconds and, 5 days post-ingestion, her liver enzymes reached peak levels (AST 1513 international units/L, ALT 2717 international units/L). Following supportive care and administration of n-acetylcysteine, she gradually recovered with normalization of prothrombin time and liver enzyme levels. The patient admitted to ingesting a bottle of chloroform approximately one hour prior to presentation (Choi et al, 2006).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old man presented to the emergency department comatose after ingesting approximately 75 mL of chloroform. He was intubated and treated with n-acetylcysteine (NAC) administered as 2 IV bolus doses followed by a continuous infusion. On hospital day 2, the patient regained consciousness and was extubated. Initially, laboratory data revealed normal liver enzyme concentrations; however, on day 4, his ALT and AST concentrations began to increase, reaching peak concentrations on day 5 of 583 and 224 international units/L, respectively. His total serum bilirubin also increased with a peak of 16.3 mg/dL. With continued NAC therapy, the patient's transaminase and bilirubin concentrations began to decrease, and NAC was discontinued on day 7. The patient's liver enzyme concentrations continued to decline, and he was subsequently transferred to a psychiatric unit without developing sequelae (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman with a history of alcohol misuse presented to the emergency department unresponsive (Glasgow Coma Scale of 5) with dyspnea and cyanosis. Vital signs indicated hypotension and tachycardia, and an initial blood gas measurement demonstrated respiratory acidosis. A urinalysis showed proteinuria and the presence of brown casts and uric acid crystals. Within 20 hours postpresentation, following supportive care, the patient was awake and alert. Interview of the patient revealed that she had daily chloroform inhalations for the last 6 days and prior to presentation, had combined chloroform inhalation with consumption of 450 mL of vodka. On hospital day 2 (27 hours post-exposure), laboratory data revealed elevated serum creatinine, BUN, and liver enzyme concentrations (ALT 1773 units/L; AST 3760 units/L). Despite continuous supportive treatment, the patient's condition progressively deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, fulminant hepatic failure, acute renal failure, encephalopathy, and cardiac arrest resulting in death approximately 78 hours postexposure. A postmortem examination revealed microvesicular hepatic steatosis and tubular renal necrosis (Lionte, 2010).
    d) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man developed acute renal failure and hepatotoxicity after ingesting 50 mL chloroform. The patient was jaundiced and initial laboratory data (hospital day 1) revealed elevated BUN (98 mg/dL), serum creatinine (6.2 mg/dL), and potassium (5.4 mEq/L) concentrations. Bilirubin peaked on hospital day 3, with total bilirubin 17 mg/dL, and conjugated bilirubin 10 mg/dL. The patient's ALT and AST concentrations were also elevated, peaking on hospital day 3 at 3560 and 1160 international units/L, respectively. With supportive care, including decontamination with activated charcoal and gastric lavage, 5 sessions of intermittent hemodialysis, and administration of N-acetylcysteine, the patient's condition improved and he was discharged on hospital day 10 (Sridhar et al, 2011).
    3.9.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) HEPATIC NECROSIS
    a) Liver necrosis was noted in experimental animals after exposure to chloroform vapor (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).

Genitourinary

    3.10.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ABNORMAL RENAL FUNCTION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Urinary output may drop over the first 2 days following ingestion when anoxia accompanies intoxication. Administration of fluids may be useful to preserve kidney function. Urine examination demonstrated glucosuria, ketonuria, albuminuria, and the presence of granular casts and red cells (Schroeder, 1965).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman with a history of alcohol misuse presented to the emergency department unresponsive (Glasgow Coma Scale of 5) with dyspnea and cyanosis. Vital signs indicated hypotension and tachycardia, and an initial blood gas measurement demonstrated respiratory acidosis. A urinalysis showed proteinuria and the presence of brown casts and uric acid crystals. Within 20 hours postpresentation, following supportive care, the patient was awake and alert. Interview of the patient revealed that she had daily chloroform inhalations for the last 6 days and prior to presentation, had combined chloroform inhalation with consumption of 450 mL of vodka. On hospital day 2 (27 hours post-exposure), laboratory data revealed elevated serum creatinine (2.1 mg/dL), BUN (61.4 mg/dL), and liver enzyme concentrations. Despite continuous supportive treatment, the patient's condition progressively deteriorated, with persistent hypotension, fulminant hepatic failure, acute renal failure, encephalopathy, and cardiac arrest resulting in death approximately 78 hours postexposure. A postmortem examination revealed microvesicular hepatic steatosis and tubular renal necrosis (Lionte, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man developed acute renal failure and hepatotoxicity after ingesting 50 mL chloroform. The patient was jaundiced and initial laboratory data (hospital day 1) revealed elevated BUN (98 mg/dL), serum creatinine (6.2 mg/dL), and potassium (5.4 mEq/L) concentrations. The patient's ALT and AST concentrations were also elevated, peaking on hospital day 3 at 3560 and 1160 international units/L, respectively. With supportive care, including decontamination with activated charcoal and gastric lavage, 5 sessions of intermittent hemodialysis, and administration of N-acetylcysteine, the patient's condition improved and he was discharged on hospital day 10 (Sridhar et al, 2011).
    B) INCREASED FREQUENCY OF URINATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Frequent urination may be noted (Plunkett, 1976).
    3.10.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) RENAL TUBULAR DISORDER
    a) The epithelium of Henle's loop and the convoluted tubules have been affected in animals after an acute poisoning with chloroform (Arena & Drew, 1986).

Acid-Base

    3.11.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) ACIDOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chloroform and hypoxia may contribute to formation of metabolic acidosis (Schroeder, 1965).
    b) Respiratory acidosis was reported in a 20-year-old woman who intentionally ingested approximately 100 mL of chloroform (Choi et al, 2006).
    c) Respiratory acidosis occurred in a 46-year-old woman who inhaled chloroform in combination with consumption of 450 mL of vodka (Lionte, 2010).

Hematologic

    3.13.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) HEMOLYSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old man developed evidence of hemolysis (free hemoglobin in the urine, anemia, indirect bilirubin increased transiently) following intravenous injection of 5 milliliters of chloroform (Timms & Moser, 1975).
    b) Mild intravascular hemolysis has also been reported following intentional inhalation exposure (Hutchens & Kung, 1985).
    B) LEUKOCYTOSIS
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) White blood cell counts of 20,000 have been reported (pp 46-49).
    C) PROTHROMBIN TIME ABNORMAL
    1) WITH THERAPEUTIC USE
    a) Chloroform anesthesia may cause a fall in the plasma prothrombin level; it is attributed to hepatic poisoning or injury (Cullen et al, 1940).
    2) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman intentionally ingested approximately 100 mL of chloroform and the next day developed a prolonged prothrombin time (14.1 seconds). Her prothrombin time peaked at 18.4 seconds 3 days post-ingestion, but gradually normalized following supportive care (Choi et al, 2006).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old man developed a prolonged prothrombin time (PT) that peaked at 21.3 seconds approximately 4 days after ingesting 75 mL of chloroform in a suicide attempt. With supportive care, his PT gradually normalized (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010).
    c) CASE REPORT: A 46-year-old woman developed a prolonged prothrombin time that peaked at 86.8 seconds approximately 27 hours after combining chloroform inhalation with consumption of 450 mL of vodka (Lionte, 2010).

Dermatologic

    3.14.2) CLINICAL EFFECTS
    A) DISCOLORATION OF SKIN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) CASE REPORT: Slightly dried pink-red spots on the skin were noted on autopsy of a pair of 52-year-old male twins found dead in a case of double suicide. The pink-red spots were thought to be produced from drops of chloroform that contacted the skin surface (Giusti & Chiarotti, 1981).
    B) CHEMICAL BURN
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Burns may occur (JEF Reynolds , 1998; McGee et al, 1987).
    b) CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 3-day history of nausea, vomiting, and malaise. At presentation, he appeared jaundice and had a partial thickness burn on his right shoulder, covering approximately 3% body surface area. His urine was also dark in color. Blood tests were consistent with a diagnosis of acute hepatitis. An abdominal ultrasound indicated hepatic steatosis. Interview of the patient revealed that, 3 days prior to presentation, he had been working with chloroform and had spilled 100 mL on his shoulder, with duration of exposure approximately 30 minutes before washing off the area. At that time, the patient noticed a red painless area on his shoulder, which began to desquamate the next day. The burn never became painful. At the hospital, the patient's transaminase and bilirubin concentrations improved 12 hours after beginning N-acetylcysteine therapy. The patient was discharged 4 days post-admission. Follow-up 8 weeks later reported normalization of his transaminase concentrations, and a repeat abdominal ultrasound was also normal (Vlad et al, 2014).
    C) SKIN IRRITATION
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Chloroform may defat the skin and produce chronic irritation with drying and cracking (Hathaway et al, 1996). Erythema and hyperemia may also occur (NIOSH, 1974).
    D) URTICARIA
    1) WITH POISONING/EXPOSURE
    a) Workers exposed to chlorine derivatives of methane developed persistent dermatographism and blotchiness of the skin of the hands and forearms (Fokina, 1965).
    3.14.3) ANIMAL EFFECTS
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) IRRITATION
    a) RABBITS: Chloroform induced mild skin irritation in the rabbit in the Standard Draize Test and in the Open Draize Test (RTECS , 1999).
    2) PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION
    a) RABBITS: In a study of experimental animals, absorption through intact skin of rabbits occurred as indicated by weight loss and degenerative changes in the kidney tubules (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    3) SKIN NECROSIS
    a) RABBITS developed slight hyperemia and moderate necrosis and scar tissue formation following dermal applications of chloroform (HSDB , 1999).

Reproductive

    3.20.1) SUMMARY
    A) Chloroform may be embryotoxic and induce changes in sperm morphology.
    B) Chloroform has been listed by one reviewer as possibly teratogenic in humans (Hoffman, 1983), but the basis for this classification is not clear.
    3.20.2) TERATOGENICITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) FETOTOXICITY
    a) Fetal death, fetotoxicity, a change in homeostasis and specific developmental abnormalities in the gastrointestinal system and musculoskeletal system were observed in the rat (RTECS , 1999).
    b) Chloroform administered to the female mouse was observed to cause fetotoxicity and specific developmental abnormalities in the craniofacial area (including the nose and tongue) in the embryo. In the rabbit, fetotoxicity and specific developmental abnormalities in the musculoskeletal system were observed (RTECS , 1999).
    c) In pregnant rats, exposure to chloroform caused an apparent decrease in the conception rate and a high incidence of fetal resorption, retarded fetal development, decreased fetal body measurements, and a low incidence of acaudate fetuses with imperforate anus (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    2) PERINATAL DISORDER
    a) When chloroform was given to both male and female mice, changes in growth statistics, biochemical and metabolic changes, and other postnatal effects were observed in the newborn (RTECS , 1999).
    3) EMBRYOTOXICITY
    a) In a rat study, chloroform was highly embryotoxic, but not highly teratogenic. In mice, a significant increase in the incidence of cleft palate was noted among the offspring of mice inhaling chloroform from days 8 through 15 of gestation, but no effect on the incidence of pregnancy was noted (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    b) Chloroform was found to be embryotoxic and somewhat teratogenic in experimental animal studies (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    4) CLEFT PALATE
    a) In another study, a significant increase in the incidence of cleft palate was noted among the offspring of mice inhaling chloroform from days 8 through 15 of gestation; no effect on the incidence of pregnancy was noted (Clayton & Clayton, 1994).
    3.20.3) EFFECTS IN PREGNANCY
    A) HUMANS
    1) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    a) Chloroform crosses the human placenta and can be detected in fetal blood (Dowty, 1976). The only cases found where chloroform was suspected of causing human reproductive effects were two cases of eclamptic toxemia of pregnancy in women working in a laboratory where chloroform was used (Tylleskar Jensen, 1967).
    B) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) PLACENTAL BARRIER
    a) Exposure to chloroform during pregnancy is NOT recommended. Chloroform diffuses readily across the placenta; it produces embryotoxicity by inhalation in animals, and strong evidence suggests chloroform may be mutagenic and carcinogenic (JEF Reynolds , 1998; Clayton & Clayton, 1994; Rosenthal, 1987).
    2) FETOTOXICITY
    a) Chloroform increased post-implantation deaths and caused decreased weight gain in rat fetuses exposed by maternal inhalation (Dilley, 1977). It reduced the conception rate, increased resorptions, and retarded fetal growth in another rat inhalation study (Schwetz, 1974). In mice, it impaired pregnancy, increased pre-implantation losses, retarded fetal growth, and also caused cleft palate (Murray, 1979).
    b) In pregnant rats given chloroform orally at high doses up to 400 mg/kg, there was reduced fetal weight; however, maternal toxicity was also evident (Ruddick, 1983). Similar results were obtained in rats and rabbits exposed by the oral route, where chloroform was not teratogenic (Thompson, 1974).
    3.20.4) EFFECTS DURING BREAST-FEEDING
    A) HUMANS
    1) LACK OF INFORMATION
    a) At the time of this review, no data were available to assess the potential effects of exposure to this agent during lactation. However, based on its physical properties, it may be excreted in breast milk.
    3.20.5) FERTILITY
    A) ANIMAL STUDIES
    1) FERTILITY DECREASED FEMALE
    a) In rats and mice, chloroform was observed to cause post-implantation mortality as well as affecting the female fertility index. Other measures of fertility were also affected in rats (RTECS , 1999).

Carcinogenicity

    3.21.1) IARC CATEGORY
    A) IARC Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS67-66-3 (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004):
    1) IARC Classification
    a) Listed as: Chloroform
    b) Carcinogen Rating: 2B
    1) The agent (mixture) is possibly carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are possibly carcinogenic to humans. This category is used for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some instances, an agent, mixture or exposure circumstance for which there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but limited evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals together with supporting evidence from other relevant data may be placed in this group.
    3.21.2) SUMMARY/HUMAN
    A) Chloroform is listed as a suspected carcinogen.
    3.21.3) HUMAN STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) Chloroform is listed as a suspected carcinogen (ACGIH, 1989).
    2) In a recent meta-analysis of ten studies examining the relationship between chlorinated drinking water and cancer, there was an association between consumption of chlorinated by-products and cancer of the bladder and rectum (Morris et al, 1992). Chloroform was used as a surrogate for total by-products in the latter study. It should be noted that there are many different disinfection byproducts in drinking water.
    3) Because of its variable results in carcinogenicity bioassays and its lack of activity as a mutagen, chloroform has been speculated to act mainly as a co-carcinogen or tumor promoter (Pereira, 1982), or by some mechanism secondary to its ability to produce structural damage to the liver or kidney (Reitz, 1982).
    4) In a case-control study on 696 cases of bladder cancer between 1992 and 1994 in Ontario, where quantitative exposure estimates for the past 40 years were available, increased risk for bladder cancer was related to both concentration and duration of exposure to chlorination by-products (King & Marrett, 1996).
    5) A case-control study conducted in Montreal, Canada of occupational exposures to any of 6 chlorinated solvents (carbon tetrachloride, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, chloroform, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene) and association with cancer found an increased risk of prostate cancer with tetrachloroethylene exposure and an increased risk of melanoma with trichloroethylene exposure. The analysis that included 3730 cancer cases (occurring from 1979 to 1985) and 533 population controls focused on the following 11 cancer types: esophagus, stomach, colon, rectum, liver, pancreas, prostate, bladder, kidney, melanoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. An association was observed between tetrachloroethylene exposure and risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 5.7 for any exposure and OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 13 for substantial exposure), as well as between trichloroethylene exposure and melanoma risk (OR, 3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 7.2 for any exposure and OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1 to 9.9 for substantial exposure). There was also an association between substantial exposure to chlorinated alkenes (ie, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene) in general and melanoma risk (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1 to 7.1). Substantial exposure was defined as a degree of confidence that the exposure actually occurred of probable or definite, a medium or high solvent concentration and frequency of exposure, and a duration of exposure that was greater than 5 years. While an association between substantial exposure to chloroform and risk of pancreatic cancer exists (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 93), this was based on only 2 exposed workers. The majority of ORs were close to null or like the chloroform and pancreatic association, were based on very small numbers, thereby providing limited power to detect real risk (Christensen et al, 2013).
    3.21.4) ANIMAL STUDIES
    A) CARCINOMA
    1) In experimental animals, the results of carcinogenicity bioassays have been mixed. Chloroform induced liver or kidney tumors, but the results were highly dependent on the animal strain and sex, and the carrier vehicle (Watts, 1986). Positive results were obtained in studies in rats with kidney tumors exposed by the oral exposure route (NCI, 1976; Weisburger, 1977), and in mice, for which levels in the drinking water of up to 1,800 mg/L produced kidney tumors (p 5). Liver tumors were also produced in mice by the oral exposure route (NCI, 1976; Weisburger, 1977).
    2) In RATS, chloroform was found to be carcinogenic and neoplastic by RTECS criteria with the presence of leukemia and liver, kidney, ureter, bladder, thyroid and blood tumors.
    3) In MICE, chloroform was found to be carcinogenic, neoplastic and an equivocal tumorigenic agent by RTECS criteria with liver, kidney, ureter, and bladder tumors (RTECS , 1999).
    4) In the NCI Carcinogenesis Bioassay (Gavage) clear evidence for carcinogenicity was found in the rat and mouse (RTECS , 1999).
    5) Hepatocellular carcinomas have been reported in mice and kidney tumors have occurred in rats (Arena & Drew, 1986; Clayton & Clayton, 1981).
    6) In studies of experimental animals, oral chloroform produced hepatomas and hepatocellular carcinomas in mice, benign and malignant kidney tumors in male mice, malignant kidney tumors in male rats, and tumors of the thyroid in female rats (Sittig, 1985; Tumasonis et al, 1987; HSDB , 1999).
    7) MICE - 39 of 41 (95%) female mice exposed to 14 mg/day of chloroform in corn oil administered by intragastric gavage for 78 weeks developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Similarly, 44 of 45 (98%) male mice exposed as above to 8 mg/day developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Eighty percent of females and 36 percent of males dosed at 7 mg/day developed liver cancer. The oil when administered alone produced less than 4% (n=157) incidence of cancer (Proctor & Hughes, 1978).
    8) RATS exposed to about 80 mg/day of chloroform by intragastric gavage over 78 weeks developed kidney tumors in 24% (12/50) of the males and 4% (2/48) of the females. Less than 30% of the tumors found were non-cancerous. No tumors were found in the control rats (n=197) (Proctor & Hughes, 1978).

Genotoxicity

    A) Chloroform may be mutagenic and induce DNA damage, DNA repair, and sister chromatid exchanges.
    B) Chloroform did not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in vitro or in vivo in mice (Larson et al, 1994).
    C) In one study, chloroform was mutagenic in E Coli WP2/pKM101 in the presence of glutathione-supplemented S9 mix. Chloroform was not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, or WP2uvrA/pKM101 with or without S9 mix, and was not mutagenic in TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, or WP2uvrA/pKM101 in the presence of glutathione-supplemented S9 mix (Araki et al, 2004).

Monitoring Parameters Levels

    4.1.1) SUMMARY
    A) Monitor CBC with differential, INR and PT/PTT, renal function, and liver enzymes in patients with significant exposure.
    B) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    C) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.
    D) Patients with significant respiratory symptoms should have a chest x-ray to evaluate for pulmonary edema or ARDS.
    E) Patients with a chloroform ingestion should have an abdominal radiograph performed to determine if there remains a large amount of radiopaque liquid that may be removed by decontamination (eg, NG aspiration) procedures.
    F) Chloroform concentrations are not readily available and are unlikely to be useful for clinical management of patients.
    4.1.2) SERUM/BLOOD
    A) BLOOD/SERUM CHEMISTRY
    1) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    2) Liver and renal function tests, CBC with differential, and INR and PT/PTT should be monitored in symptomatic patients.
    4.1.3) URINE
    A) URINALYSIS
    1) Obtain urinalysis, following chloroform intoxication, for possible renal function abnormalities.
    4.1.4) OTHER
    A) OTHER
    1) ECG
    a) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.

Radiographic Studies

    A) CHEST RADIOGRAPH
    1) Chest x-ray may be of value if pulmonary function is compromised.
    B) ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPH
    1) The chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents are radiopaque and an abdominal radiograph should be obtained after oral exposure to determine efficacy of decontamination procedures (Dally et al, 1987).

Methods

    A) CHROMATOGRAPHY
    1) Head space GLC technique produced better quantitative results than either the Fujiwara reaction or steam distillation (Guisti & Chiarotti, 1981)
    2) Gas chromatograph with flame-ionization detector was used to identify and quantitate the chloroform content of tissues in 2 homicide victims (McGee et al, 1987).
    3) A capillary gas chromatographic method, with the cryogenic trapping of samples, was described by Watanabe et al (1997) in order to measure the amount of chloroform present in whole blood. The detection limit, using this method, was estimated to be approximately 2 ng/0.5 mL (Watanabe et al, 1997).

Life Support

    A) Support respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Patient Disposition

    6.3.1) DISPOSITION/ORAL EXPOSURE
    6.3.1.1) ADMISSION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Patients with a significant exposure should be admitted for cardiovascular monitoring and monitored for delayed pulmonary, hepatic, and renal toxicity.
    6.3.1.2) HOME CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Asymptomatic patients with only a minimal exposure may be monitored at home.
    6.3.1.3) CONSULT CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Consult a toxicologist for any patient with symptomatic toxicity. Consult a nephrologist for patients with evidence of renal failure. Consult an ophthalmologist for patients with a significant ocular exposure.
    6.3.1.5) OBSERVATION CRITERIA/ORAL
    A) Any patient with ingestion of more than a minimal amount of chloroform or symptoms after inhalational exposure should be referred to a healthcare facility for evaluation and monitoring.

Monitoring

    A) Monitor CBC with differential, INR and PT/PTT, renal function, and liver enzymes in patients with significant exposure.
    B) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    C) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.
    D) Patients with significant respiratory symptoms should have a chest x-ray to evaluate for pulmonary edema or ARDS.
    E) Patients with a chloroform ingestion should have an abdominal radiograph performed to determine if there remains a large amount of radiopaque liquid that may be removed by decontamination (eg, NG aspiration) procedures.
    F) Chloroform concentrations are not readily available and are unlikely to be useful for clinical management of patients.

Oral Exposure

    6.5.1) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION/PREHOSPITAL
    A) Prehospital gastrointestinal decontamination for chloroform ingestion is not recommended due to the potential for GI irritation, abrupt onset of CNS depression, and the risk for aspiration. INHALATIONAL EXPOSURE: Remove patient to fresh air. DERMAL EXPOSURE: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water.
    6.5.2) PREVENTION OF ABSORPTION
    A) SUMMARY
    1) Because of the potential for gastrointestinal tract irritation and an abrupt onset of severe CNS depression and the risk of aspiration, GI decontamination is NOT recommended routinely. For patients with evidence of a large life-threatening ingestion (eg, large volume of radiopaque chloroform seen in stomach on abdominal x-ray), NG tube aspiration may be considered only after the airway has been protected.
    6.5.3) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) MANAGEMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    2) MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE TOXICITY
    a) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive. Treat ventricular dysrhythmias using standard ACLS protocols. Renal failure may require renal replacement therapy. Hepatic injury may be treated with N-acetylcysteine with a similar protocol to that used for acetaminophen toxicity. Rarely, hemolysis may require treatment with packed red blood cell transfusions.
    B) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with significant CNS depression or respiratory depression may require intubation; consider using lung-protective ventilator settings given the risk for ARDS.
    C) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor CBC with differential, INR and PT/PTT, renal function, and liver enzymes in patients with significant exposure.
    2) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    3) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.
    4) Patients with significant respiratory symptoms should have a chest x-ray to evaluate for pulmonary edema or ARDS.
    5) Patients with a chloroform ingestion should have an abdominal radiograph performed to determine if there remains a large amount of radiopaque liquid that may be removed by decontamination (eg, NG aspiration) procedures.
    6) Chloroform concentrations are not readily available and are unlikely to be useful for clinical management of patients.
    D) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA
    1) Epinephrine and other sympathomimetics should be used with caution due to possible increased sensitivity of the myocardium to catecholamines as a result of chloroform exposure. Ventricular arrhythmias may be precipitated.
    2) VENTRICULAR DYSRHYTHMIAS SUMMARY
    a) Obtain an ECG, institute continuous cardiac monitoring and administer oxygen. Evaluate for hypoxia, acidosis, and electrolyte disorders (particularly hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia). Lidocaine and amiodarone are generally first line agents for stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, particularly in patients with underlying impaired cardiac function. Amiodarone should be used with caution if a substance that prolongs the QT interval and/or causes torsades de pointes is involved in the overdose. Unstable rhythms require immediate cardioversion.
    3) LIDOCAINE
    a) LIDOCAINE/INDICATIONS
    1) Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek et al, 2010).
    b) LIDOCAINE/DOSE
    1) ADULT: 1 to 1.5 milligrams/kilogram via intravenous push. For refractory VT/VF an additional bolus of 0.5 to 0.75 milligram/kilogram can be given at 5 to 10 minute intervals to a maximum dose of 3 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010). Only bolus therapy is recommended during cardiac arrest.
    a) Once circulation has been restored begin a maintenance infusion of 1 to 4 milligrams per minute. If dysrhythmias recur during infusion repeat 0.5 milligram/kilogram bolus and increase the infusion rate incrementally (maximal infusion rate is 4 milligrams/minute) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) CHILD: 1 milligram/kilogram initial bolus IV/IO; followed by a continuous infusion of 20 to 50 micrograms/kilogram/minute (de Caen et al, 2015).
    c) LIDOCAINE/MAJOR ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1) Paresthesias; muscle twitching; confusion; slurred speech; seizures; respiratory depression or arrest; bradycardia; coma. May cause significant AV block or worsen pre-existing block. Prophylactic pacemaker may be required in the face of bifascicular, second degree, or third degree heart block (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006; Neumar et al, 2010).
    d) LIDOCAINE/MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) Monitor ECG continuously; plasma concentrations as indicated (Prod Info Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, 2006).
    4) AMIODARONE
    a) AMIODARONE/INDICATIONS
    1) Effective for the control of hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Also recommended for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation and vasopressor therapy (Link et al, 2015; Neumar et al, 2010). It should be used with caution when the ingestion involves agents known to cause QTc prolongation, such as fluoroquinolones, macrolide antibiotics or azoles, and when ECG reveals QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose (Prod Info Cordarone(R) oral tablets, 2015).
    b) AMIODARONE/ADULT DOSE
    1) For ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT unresponsive to CPR, defibrillation, and a vasopressor therapy give an initial dose of 300 mg IV followed by 1 dose of 150 mg IV. For stable ventricular tachycardias: Infuse 150 milligrams over 10 minutes, and repeat if necessary. Follow by a 1 milligram/minute infusion for 6 hours, then a 0.5 milligram/minute. Maximum total dose over 24 hours is 2.2 grams (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) AMIODARONE/PEDIATRIC DOSE
    1) Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram as a bolus for pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; may repeat twice up to 15 mg/kg. Infuse 5 milligrams/kilogram over 20 to 60 minutes for perfusing tachycardias. Maximum single dose is 300 mg. Routine use with other drugs that prolong the QT interval is NOT recommended (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    d) ADVERSE EFFECTS
    1) Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common adverse effects (Neumar et al, 2010).
    5) PROCAINAMIDE
    a) PROCAINAMIDE/INDICATIONS
    1) An alternative drug in the treatment of PVCs or recurrent ventricular tachycardia when lidocaine is contraindicated or not effective. It should be avoided when the ingestion involves agents with quinidine-like effects (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines, chloroquine, antidysrhythmics) and when the ECG reveals QRS widening or QT prolongation suspected to be secondary to overdose(Neumar et al, 2010; Vanden Hoek,TLet al,null).
    b) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT LOADING DOSE
    1) 20 to 50 milligrams/minute IV until dysrhythmia is suppressed or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%), or a total dose of 17 milligrams/kilogram is given (1.2 grams for a 70 kilogram person) (Neumar et al, 2010).
    2) ALTERNATIVE DOSING: 100 mg every 5 minutes until dysrhythmia is controlled, or toxicity develops from procainamide (hypotension develops or the QRS is widened by 50%) or 17 mg/kg have been given (Neumar et al, 2010).
    3) MAXIMUM DOSE: 17 milligrams/kilogram (Neumar et al, 2010).
    c) PROCAINAMIDE/CONTROLLED INFUSION
    1) In conscious patients, procainamide should be administered as a controlled infusion (20 milligrams/minute) because of the risk of QT prolongation and its hypotensive effects (Link et al, 2015)
    d) PROCAINAMIDE/ADULT MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) 1 to 4 milligrams/minute via an intravenous infusion (Neumar et al, 2010).
    e) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC LOADING DOSE
    1) 15 milligrams/kilogram IV/Intraosseously over 30 to 60 minutes; discontinue if hypotension develops or the QRS widens by 50% (Kleinman et al, 2010).
    f) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAINTENANCE DOSE
    1) Initiate at 20 mcg/kg/minute and increase in 10 mcg/kg/minute increments every 15 to 30 minutes until desired effect is achieved; up to 80 mcg/kg/minute (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    g) PROCAINAMIDE/PEDIATRIC MAXIMUM DOSE
    1) 2 grams/day (Bouhouch et al, 2008; Ratnasamy et al, 2008; Mandapati et al, 2000; Luedtke et al, 1997; Walsh et al, 1997).
    h) MONITORING PARAMETERS
    1) ECG, blood pressure, and blood concentrations (Prod Info procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, 2011). Procainamide can produce hypotension and QT prolongation (Link et al, 2015).
    i) AVOID
    1) Avoid in patients with QT prolongation and CHF (Neumar et al, 2010).
    E) ACETYLCYSTEINE
    1) N-acetylcysteine has been proposed as a possible treatment for poisoning by chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents (Laurenzi et al, 1987). At present, this must be considered experimental, however the adverse effects of NAC are limited so the potential benefit likely outweighs and risk.
    2) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old man presented to the emergency department comatose after ingesting approximately 75 mL of chloroform. He was intubated and was treated with n-acetylcysteine (NAC), initially given 150 mg/kg IV over 1 hour, followed by 50 mg/kg over 4 hours. A continuous IV infusion was started at a rate of 6.25 mg/kg/hour. On hospital day 2, the patient regained consciousness and was extubated. Initially, laboratory data revealed normal liver enzyme concentrations; however, on day 4, his ALT and AST concentrations began to increase, reaching peak concentrations, on day 5, of 583 and 224 international units/liter, respectively. His total serum bilirubin also increased with a peak of 16.3 mg/dL. With continued NAC therapy, the patient's transaminase and bilirubin concentrations began to decrease, and NAC was discontinued on day 7. The patient's liver enzyme concentrations continued to decline and he was subsequently transferred to a psychiatric unit without developing sequelae (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010).
    3) Boyer et al (1998) reported a patient who ingested 230 milliliters of chloroform, subsequently developed stupor, hypoventilation, and elevated liver enzyme levels, and was treated with oral N-acetylcysteine, 70 milligrams/kilogram for 21 doses over 4 days (Boyer et al, 1998). The authors speculate that the administration of oral N-acetylcysteine prevented the occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity following extensive oral chloroform exposure.
    4) Rao et al (1993) reported that N-acetylcysteine was administered to a patient, following acute chloroform poisoning, in order to replenish glutathione stores (Rao et al, 1993). Initially, a loading dose of 140 milligrams/kilogram was administered followed by 70 milligrams/kilogram given every 4 hours for a total of 17 doses.
    5) CASE REPORT: N-acetylcysteine, 600 milligrams daily, was given to a 20-year-old woman who intentionally ingested approximately 100 milliliters of chloroform and subsequently became comatose with elevated liver enzyme levels and a prolonged prothrombin time. The patient's prothrombin time was prolonged on day 1 post-ingestion (14.1 seconds), reaching a peak level of 18.4 seconds on day 3 post-ingestion, and her liver enzymes reached peak levels on day 5 post-ingestion (AST 1513 international units/liter, ALT 2717 international units/liter). N-acetylcysteine was administered on day 1 post-ingestion and continued for 10 days until discharge (11 days post-ingestion). At the time of discharge, her liver enzyme levels had decreased (AST 80 international units/liter, ALT 421 international units/liter) and her prothrombin time had normalized (Choi et al, 2006).
    6) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man developed hepatotoxicity after ingesting 50 mL chloroform. The patient was jaundiced and laboratory data revealed elevated ALT and AST concentrations (3560 and 1160 international units/L, respectively). Administration of N-acetylcysteine at a bolus dose of 100 mg/kg IV, followed by a continuous IV infusion of 6.25 mg/kg/hr for 6 days resulted in improvement in his liver function and a decrease in ALT and AST concentrations (133 and 70 international units/L, respectively) at the time of discharge on hospital day 10 (Sridhar et al, 2011).

Inhalation Exposure

    6.7.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) Move patient from the toxic environment to fresh air. Monitor for respiratory distress. If cough or difficulty in breathing develops, evaluate for hypoxia, respiratory tract irritation, bronchitis, or pneumonitis.
    B) OBSERVATION: Carefully observe patients with inhalation exposure for the development of any systemic signs or symptoms and administer symptomatic treatment as necessary.
    C) INITIAL TREATMENT: Administer 100% humidified supplemental oxygen, perform endotracheal intubation and provide assisted ventilation as required. Administer inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonists, if bronchospasm develops. Consider systemic corticosteroids in patients with significant bronchospasm (National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute, 2007). Exposed skin and eyes should be flushed with copious amounts of water.
    6.7.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Treatment is symptomatic and supportive.
    B) AIRWAY MANAGEMENT
    1) Patients with significant CNS depression or respiratory depression may require intubation; consider using lung-protective ventilator settings given the risk for ARDS.
    C) MONITORING OF PATIENT
    1) Monitor CBC with differential, INR and PT/PTT, renal function, and liver enzymes in patients with significant exposure.
    2) Monitor fluid and electrolyte levels in patients with persistent vomiting.
    3) Obtain an ECG, and institute continuous cardiac monitoring in symptomatic patients.
    4) Patients with significant respiratory symptoms should have a chest x-ray to evaluate for pulmonary edema or ARDS.
    5) Chloroform concentrations are not readily available and are unlikely to be useful for clinical management of patients.
    D) ACUTE LUNG INJURY
    1) ONSET: Onset of acute lung injury after toxic exposure may be delayed up to 24 to 72 hours after exposure in some cases.
    2) NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT: The treatment of acute lung injury is primarily supportive (Cataletto, 2012). Maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation with frequent monitoring of arterial blood gases and/or pulse oximetry. If a high FIO2 is required to maintain adequate oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be required; ventilation with small tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) is preferred if ARDS develops (Haas, 2011; Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    a) To minimize barotrauma and other complications, use the lowest amount of PEEP possible while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Use of smaller tidal volumes (6 mL/kg) and lower plateau pressures (30 cm water or less) has been associated with decreased mortality and more rapid weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS (Brower et al, 2000). More treatment information may be obtained from ARDS Clinical Network website, NIH NHLBI ARDS Clinical Network Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Summary, http://www.ardsnet.org/node/77791 (NHLBI ARDS Network, 2008)
    3) FLUIDS: Crystalloid solutions must be administered judiciously. Pulmonary artery monitoring may help. In general the pulmonary artery wedge pressure should be kept relatively low while still maintaining adequate cardiac output, blood pressure and urine output (Stolbach & Hoffman, 2011).
    4) ANTIBIOTICS: Indicated only when there is evidence of infection (Artigas et al, 1998).
    5) EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY: Partial liquid ventilation has shown promise in preliminary studies (Kollef & Schuster, 1995).
    6) CALFACTANT: In a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial, endotracheal instillation of 2 doses of 80 mL/m(2) calfactant (35 mg/mL of phospholipid suspension in saline) in infants, children, and adolescents with acute lung injury resulted in acute improvement in oxygenation and lower mortality; however, no significant decrease in the course of respiratory failure measured by duration of ventilator therapy, intensive care unit, or hospital stay was noted. Adverse effects (transient hypoxia and hypotension) were more frequent in calfactant patients, but these effects were mild and did not require withdrawal from the study (Wilson et al, 2005).
    7) However, in a multicenter, randomized, controlled, and masked trial, endotracheal instillation of up to 3 doses of calfactant (30 mg) in adults only with acute lung injury/ARDS due to direct lung injury was not associated with improved oxygenation and longer term benefits compared to the placebo group. It was also associated with significant increases in hypoxia and hypotension (Willson et al, 2015).
    E) ENHANCED ELIMINATION PROCEDURE
    1) HEMODIALYSIS
    a) Hemodialysis has not been shown to enhance chloroform elimination; however, it may be necessary to treat renal failure in severe cases.
    2) PLASMAPHERESIS
    a) CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old woman developed acute hepatitis with encephalopathy following occupational exposure to chloroform vapors at a concentration of more than 15 ppm for 2 weeks. The patient's condition improved following several treatments with plasmapheresis (Lin et al, 2005).
    F) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Eye Exposure

    6.8.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) EYE IRRIGATION, ROUTINE: Remove contact lenses and irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of room temperature 0.9% saline or water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation, pain, swelling, lacrimation, or photophobia persist after 15 minutes of irrigation, an ophthalmologic examination should be performed (Peate, 2007; Naradzay & Barish, 2006).

Dermal Exposure

    6.9.1) DECONTAMINATION
    A) DERMAL DECONTAMINATION
    1) Remove contaminated clothing (DOT, 1990).
    2) DECONTAMINATION: Remove contaminated clothing and wash exposed area thoroughly with soap and water for 10 to 15 minutes. A physician may need to examine the area if irritation or pain persists (Burgess et al, 1999).
    6.9.2) TREATMENT
    A) SUPPORT
    1) Chloroform may be absorbed through the skin. Observe patient for delayed toxicity.
    B) Treatment should include recommendations listed in the ORAL EXPOSURE section when appropriate.

Enhanced Elimination

    A) HEMODIALYSIS
    1) Hemodialysis has not been shown to enhance chloroform elimination; however, it may be necessary to treat renal failure in severe cases.

Case Reports

    A) ROUTE OF EXPOSURE
    1) ORAL: A 19 year old man collapsed at a "chloroform party" where he had consumed 3 bottles of beer and mistakenly drank an unknown amount of chloroform.
    a) On arrival at a local emergency room he was stuporous with a blood pressure of 110/60 mmHg. He was transferred to the ICU and on admission he was noted to be comatose with labored breathing, cyanotic, and hypoactive deep tendon reflexes. Vital signs were respirations 26/minute, pulse 108 beats/minute, and blood pressure 100/40 mmHg.
    b) He was intubated and hypoxia was corrected with continuous positive pressure ventilation. A blood chloroform level of 20 mg/100 mL was reported at 10 hours postingestion. Liver function abnormalities occurred.
    c) Reported peak SGOT 8,080 IU on day 3, SGPT 10,250 IU on day 4, LDH 9,280 IU on day 3, total bilirubin 2.7 mg/100 mL on day 4, alkaline phosphatase 6.4 IU on day 4 and prothrombin time 19.3 (patient)/11.9 (control) on day 2. Cerebellar damage (instability of gait, slight finger tremor) was noted on day 3 when the patient was extubated and able to respond. Liver function tests were reported as normal 8 weeks after discharge (Storms, 1973).
    2) ORAL: A 52-year-old research chemist exhibited psychotic self-mutilating behavior presumably as a result of chronic chloroform abuse and ultimately committed suicide by ingesting a large quantity of liquid chloroform (Kohr, 1990).

Summary

    A) TOXICITY: Concentrations of chloroform used for the induction of anesthesia range from 20,000 to 40,000 ppm for brief periods; exposure to these concentrations for a longer duration of time is life-threatening. Exposure to 14,000 ppm becomes dangerous to life at 1 hour of exposure. Death due to CNS depression may result with acute ingestion of as little as 10 mL, with the average oral lethal dose estimated to be 0.5 to 5 g/kg.

Therapeutic Dose

    7.2.1) ADULT
    A) GENERAL
    1) Chloroform is a volatile halogenated anaesthetic administered by inhalation but because of its toxicity it is seldom used now in general anaesthesia (S Sweetman , 2001).

Minimum Lethal Exposure

    A) SUMMARY
    1) The primary route of human exposure to chloroform is inhalation; most lethal dose information has been obtained from clinical reports of patients exposed to chloroform via anesthesia. Concentrations used for the induction of anesthesia were in the range of 20,000 to 40,000 ppm, followed by lower maintenance levels; continued exposure to 20,000 ppm resulted in respiratory failure, cardiac arrhythmia, and death. Acute hepatotoxicity was typically observed 24 to 48 hours post-exposure and often resulted in death (ATSDR, 1997; Hathaway et al, 1996).
    a) Unless brief, exposures to 40,000 ppm have been reported lethal (Bingham et al, 2001).
    b) Exposure to 14,000 ppm becomes dangerous to life in one hour (OHM/TADS , 2001).
    2) Death has occurred following inhalation of chloroform from a handkerchief placed over the mouth and nose for anesthesia prior to surgery. On post-mortem examination the patient was found to have a diseased heart which was thought to have contributed to the death (Matsuki, 1973).
    3) Death due to central nervous system depression may result with acute ingestion of as little as 10 mL chloroform (Baselt, 2000). The oral lethal dose was estimated to be 0.5 to 5 g/kg (1 ounce to 1 pint) for an average 70 kg person (EPA, 1985).

Maximum Tolerated Exposure

    A) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    1) A man died of severe hepatic injury 9 days after ingesting approximately 6 ounces (3755 mg/kg) of chloroform; in contrast, a patient recovered from toxic hepatitis after ingesting approximately 4 ounces (2500 mg/kg) of chloroform (ATSDR, 1997).
    2) Experimental Human Exposure (Hathaway et al, 1996):
    CONCENTRATION (ppm)OBSERVED COMPLAINTS
    14,000-16,000Loss of consciousness
    <4100Serious Disorientation
    1000 (single exposure)Dizziness, nausea, fatigue, headache
    77-237 (prolonged exposure)Digestive disturbances, lassitude, mental dullness, frequent, burning urination
    20-70 (prolonged exposure)Milder symptoms

    3) Workers (17/68) exposed regularly to chloroform concentrations of 10 to 200 ppm for 1 to 4 years had hepatomegaly. In a different group of workers exposed to 50 ppm, no signs or symptoms were observed (Hathaway et al, 1996).
    4) According to Bingham et al (2001), concentrations of 70 to 80 mg/L are the narcotic limiting concentrations; 20 mg/L leads to vomiting and a sensation of fainting; 7.2 mg/L of chloroform leads to dizziness and salivation a few minutes after exposure; 5 mg/L leads to dizziness, intracranial pressure, and nausea 7 minutes after exposure, with fatigue and headache felt later (Bingham et al, 2001a).
    5) Acute hepatitis with encephalopathy occurred in a 24-year-old woman who was occupationally exposed to chloroform at a concentration of more than 15 ppm for 2 weeks (Lin et al, 2005).
    B) CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman became comatose with elevated liver enzyme levels and a prolonged prothrombin time after intentionally ingesting approximately 100 mL of chloroform. The patient gradually recovered following administration of n-acetylcysteine and supportive care (Choi et al, 2006).
    C) CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old man developed elevated liver enzyme concentrations and a prolonged prothrombin time after ingesting approximately 75 mL of chloroform. Following n-acetylcysteine therapy and supportive care, the patient recovered without sequelae (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010).
    D) CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old man developed acute renal failure and hepatotoxicity after ingesting 50 mL chloroform. With supportive care, including decontamination with activated charcoal and gastric lavage, 5 sessions of intermittent hemodialysis, and administration of N-acetylcysteine, the patient's condition improved and he was discharged on hospital day 10 (Sridhar et al, 2011).

Serum Plasma Blood Concentrations

    7.5.2) TOXIC CONCENTRATIONS
    A) TOXIC CONCENTRATION LEVELS
    1) CONCENTRATION LEVEL
    a) Blood concentrations reported after fatalities have ranged from 1-12 milligrams percent (Allan et al, 1988) Glusti & Chiarotti, 1981).
    b) A 39-year-old female died after inhaling chloroform and her blood chloroform concentration was approximately 32.5 micrograms/mL (Harada et al, 1997).
    c) A 19-year-old man intentionally ingested approximately 75 mL of chloroform, became comatose, and subsequently developed elevated liver enzyme concentrations. His serum chloroform concentration at hospital admission was 91 mcg/mL. Following acetylcysteine therapy and supportive care, the patient recovered without sequelae (Dell'Aglio et al, 2010).

Workplace Standards

    A) ACGIH TLV Values for CAS67-66-3 (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010):
    1) Editor's Note: The listed values are recommendations or guidelines developed by ACGIH(R) to assist in the control of health hazards. They should only be used, interpreted and applied by individuals trained in industrial hygiene. Before applying these values, it is imperative to read the introduction to each section in the current TLVs(R) and BEI(R) Book and become familiar with the constraints and limitations to their use. Always consult the Documentation of the TLVs(R) and BEIs(R) before applying these recommendations and guidelines.
    a) Adopted Value
    1) Chloroform
    a) TLV:
    1) TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
    2) TLV-STEL:
    3) TLV-Ceiling:
    b) Notations and Endnotes:
    1) Carcinogenicity Category: A3
    2) Codes: Not Listed
    3) Definitions:
    a) A3: Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to Humans: The agent is carcinogenic in experimental animals at a relatively high dose, by route(s) of administration, at site(s), of histologic type(s), or by mechanism(s) that may not be relevant to worker exposure. Available epidemiologic studies do not confirm an increased risk of cancer in exposed humans. Available evidence does not suggest that the agent is likely to cause cancer in humans except under uncommon or unlikely routes or levels of exposure.
    c) TLV Basis - Critical Effect(s): Liver dam; embryo/fetal dam; CNS impair
    d) Molecular Weight: 119.38
    1) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from ppm to mg/m(3):
    a) [(TLV in ppm)(gram molecular weight of substance)]/24.45
    2) For gases and vapors, to convert the TLV from mg/m(3) to ppm:
    a) [(TLV in mg/m(3))(24.45)]/gram molecular weight of substance
    e) Additional information:

    B) NIOSH REL and IDLH Values for CAS67-66-3 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007):
    1) Listed as: Chloroform
    2) REL:
    a) TWA:
    b) STEL: 2 ppm (9.78 mg/m(3)) [60-minute]
    c) Ceiling:
    d) Carcinogen Listing: (Ca) NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    e) Skin Designation: Not Listed
    f) Note(s): See Appendix A
    3) IDLH:
    a) IDLH: 500 ppm
    b) Note(s): Ca
    1) Ca: NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A).

    C) Carcinogenicity Ratings for CAS67-66-3 :
    1) ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010): A3 ; Listed as: Chloroform
    a) A3 :Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to Humans: The agent is carcinogenic in experimental animals at a relatively high dose, by route(s) of administration, at site(s), of histologic type(s), or by mechanism(s) that may not be relevant to worker exposure. Available epidemiologic studies do not confirm an increased risk of cancer in exposed humans. Available evidence does not suggest that the agent is likely to cause cancer in humans except under uncommon or unlikely routes or levels of exposure.
    2) EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011): B2 ; Listed as: Chloroform
    a) B2 : Probable human carcinogen - based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in animals.
    3) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2016; International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2010a; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2008; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2007; IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2006; IARC, 2004): 2B ; Listed as: Chloroform
    a) 2B : The agent (mixture) is possibly carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are possibly carcinogenic to humans. This category is used for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some instances, an agent, mixture or exposure circumstance for which there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but limited evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals together with supporting evidence from other relevant data may be placed in this group.
    4) NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007): Ca ; Listed as: Chloroform
    a) Ca : NIOSH considers this substance to be a potential occupational carcinogen (See Appendix A in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards).
    5) MAK (DFG, 2002): Category 4 ; Listed as: Chloroform
    a) Category 4 : Substances with carcinogenic potential for which genotoxicity plays no or at most a minor part. No significant contribution to human cancer risk is expected provided the MAK value is observed. The classification is supported especially by evidence that increases in cellular proliferation or changes in cellular differentiation are important in the mode of action. To characterize the cancer risk, the manifold mechanisms contributing to carcinogenesis and their characteristic dose-time-response relationships are taken into consideration.
    6) NTP (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project ): Not Listed

    D) OSHA PEL Values for CAS67-66-3 (U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA), 2010):
    1) Listed as: Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
    2) Table Z-1 for Chloroform (Trichloromethane):
    a) 8-hour TWA:
    1) ppm: 50
    a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of contaminated air by volume at 25 degrees C and 760 torr.
    2) mg/m3: 240
    a) Milligrams of substances per cubic meter of air. When entry is in this column only, the value is exact; when listed with a ppm entry, it is approximate.
    3) Ceiling Value: (C) - An employee's exposure to this substance shall at no time exceed the exposure limit given.
    4) Skin Designation: No
    5) Notation(s): Not Listed

Toxicity Information

    7.7.1) TOXICITY VALUES
    A) References: ATSDR, 1997 Bingham et al, 2001 HSDB, 2001 IPCS, 1994 ITI, 1995 Lewis, 2000 OHM/TADS, 2001 RTECS, 2001
    1) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)MOUSE:
    a) 623 mg/kg
    2) LD50- (ORAL)MOUSE:
    a) 1750 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    b) 118-1400 mg/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    c) 1100 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    d) 36 mg/kg
    e) Male, 1120 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    f) Female, 1400 mg/kg at 1 time/day for 14D (ATSDR, 1997)
    3) LD50- (SUBCUTANEOUS)MOUSE:
    a) 3283 mg/kg (ITI, 1995)
    b) 704 mg/kg
    4) LD50- (INTRAPERITONEAL)RAT:
    a) Female, 1379 mg/kg for 24H (IPCS, 1994)
    b) Female, 894 mg/kg for 14D (IPCS, 1994)
    c) 894 mg/kg
    5) LD50- (ORAL)RAT:
    a) 444-2000 mg/kg (Bingham et al, 2001)
    b) 1875 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    c) 450 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    d) 300 mg/kg (OHM/TADS, 2001)
    e) Male, 14 days old, 450 mg/kg (IPCS, 1994)
    f) Male, 1200 mg/kg (IPCS, 1994)
    g) Male, 908 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997; HSDB, 2001)
    h) Male, 908 mg/kg for 14D (IPCS, 1994)
    i) Male, 2000 mg/kg for 14D (IPCS, 1994)
    j) Male, young adult, 1337 mg/kg/once (ATSDR, 1997)
    k) Male, 14 days old, 446 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    l) Male, old adult, 1188 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    m) Male, 2000 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    n) Female, 2180 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997)
    o) Female, 14 days old, 450 mg/kg (IPCS, 1994)
    p) Female, 1117 mg/kg (ATSDR, 1997; HSDB, 2001)
    q) Female, 1117 mg/kg for 14D (IPCS, 1994)
    r) Male, 908 mg/kg (HSDB, 2001; Lewis, 2000)
    s) 300 mg/kg (ITI, 1995)
    t) 695 mg/kg - change in motor activity; ataxia; respiratory stimulation
    6) TCLo- (INHALATION)HUMAN:
    a) 10 mg/m(3) for 1Y -- central nervous system effects; gastrointestinal effects (Lewis, 2000)
    b) 5000 mg/m(3) for 7M -- hallucinations
    c) 10 mg/m(3) for 1Y -- anorexia, nausea
    7) TCLo- (INHALATION)MOUSE:
    a) Female, 100 ppm for 7H at 1-7D of pregnancy -- changes in female fertility index; fetotoxicity (except death); post- implantation mortality
    b) Female, 100 ppm for 7H at 8-15D of pregnancy
    c) Female, 100 ppm for 7H at 8-15D of pregnancy -- craniofacial abnormalities
    d) 100 ppm for 6H/7D-intermittent -- weight loss/weight gain; changes in liver weight
    e) 12 ppm for 6H/13W-intermittent -- death
    8) TCLo- (INHALATION)RAT:
    a) Female, 20,100 mcg/m(3) for 1H at 7-14D of pregnancy -- fetotoxicity; fetal death
    b) Female, 30 ppm for 7H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- fertility effects; fetotoxicity (except death); developmental abnormalities of the musculoskeletal system
    c) Female, 300 ppm for 7H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- decrease in female fertility index; post-implantation mortality
    d) Female, 100 ppm for 7H at 6-15D of pregnancy -- homeostasis; abnormalities of the gastrointestinal system
    e) Female, 20,100 mcg/m(3) for 1H at 7-14D of pregnancy - teratogenic (Lewis, 2000)
    f) 50 ppm for 7H/26W-intermittent -- fibrosis; pneumoconiosis; changes in bladder weight; liver changes
    g) 90 ppm for 6H/13W-intermittent -- hepatitis; acute renal failure; acute tubular necrosis; weight loss/decreased weight gain
    h) 300 ppm for 6H/7D-intermittent -- changes to sense organs; changes to musculoskeletal system
    i) 592 mg/m(3) for 2.5H/2W-intermittent -- changes in food intake; changes to liver; changes to kidney, ureter, and bladder

Pharmacologic Mechanism

    A) Chloroform is a central nervous system depressant producing anesthesia, analgesia, inebriation, and narcosis (Arena & Drew, 1986).

Toxicologic Mechanism

    A) The mechanism of chloroform-induced hepatic and renal toxicity has been described by Kluwe et al (1978). Cytochrome P-450 oxidizes chloroform to produce chloromethanol (CCl30H). This intermediate rapidly dechlorinates spontaneously resulting in hydrochloric acid and phosgene (COCl2). Phosgene in turn reacts with water to produce carbon dioxide and chloride ion, and with glutathione to produce diglutathionyl dithiocarbonate. It appears that glutathione is only depleted to a critical level in the liver and kidney where covalent binding of phosgene and tissue macromolecules occurs, resulting in hepatic and renal necrosis. Treatment with N-acetycysteine has therefore been proposed (Laurenzi et al, 1987).

Physical Characteristics

    A) Chloroform is a heavy, colorless, clear, highly refractive, nonflammable, volatile liquid. It has a sweet taste and a characteristic, pleasant, sweet odor (AAR, 2000; (ACGIH, 1991; Budavari, 1996) Lewis, 1997; (Lewis, 2000; Lewis, 1998).
    1) To avoid photochemical transformation to hydrogen chloride and phosgene, reagent grade chloroform typically contains 0.75% ethanol, which acts as a stabilizer (IPCS, 1994).

Ph

    A) Not Applicable

Molecular Weight

    A) 119.38

Other

    A) ODOR THRESHOLD
    1) 2.4 ppm (w/v) (in water) (ATSDR, 1997)
    2) 85 ppm (v/v) (in air) (ATSDR, 1997)
    3) 3.30 mg/L (in air) (HSDB , 2001)
    4) 250 mg/m(3) (Low); 1000 mg/m(3) (High) (HSDB , 2001)
    5) 205-307 ppm (CHRIS , 2001)
    6) 50 ppm (Baselt, 1997)
    7) 200-300 ppm (OHM/TADS , 2001)
    8) 200-300 ppm; this concentration may act as an exposure warning to acutely hazardous amounts, but is not low enough to be considered a warning for chronic exposure (Bingham et al, 2001; Sittig, 1991).

General Bibliography

    1) 40 CFR 372.28: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Lower thresholds for chemicals of special concern. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO). Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    2) 40 CFR 372.65: Environmental Protection Agency - Toxic Chemical Release Reporting, Community Right-To-Know, Chemicals and Chemical Categories to which this part applies. National Archives and Records Association (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Apr 3, 2006.
    3) 49 CFR 172.101 - App. B: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials, Appendix B: List of Marine Pollutants. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 29, 2005.
    4) 49 CFR 172.101: Department of Transportation - Table of Hazardous Materials. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC. Final rules current as of Aug 11, 2005.
    5) 62 FR 58840: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 1997.
    6) 65 FR 14186: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    7) 65 FR 39264: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    8) 65 FR 77866: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2000.
    9) 66 FR 21940: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2001.
    10) 67 FR 7164: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2002.
    11) 68 FR 42710: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2003.
    12) 69 FR 54144: Notice of the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances - Proposed AEGL Values, Environmental Protection Agency, NAC/AEGL Committee. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC, 2004.
    13) ACGIH: 2000 Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 2000.
    14) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1989-1990, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1989.
    15) ACGIH: Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 6th ed, Am Conference of Govt Ind Hyg, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
    16) AIHA: 2006 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, VA, 2006.
    17) ATSDR: Toxicological Profile for Chloroform, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1997.
    18) Allan AR, Blackmore RC, & Toseland PA: A chloroform inhalation fatality: an unusual asphyxiation. Med Sci Law 1988; 28:120-122.
    19) Alvarezcohen L, Mccarty PL, & Boulygina E: Characterization of a methane-utilizing bacterium from a bacterial consortium that rapidly degrades trichloroethylene and chloroform. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58:1886-1893.
    20) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : ACGIH 2010 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs(R)) for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs(R)), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
    21) Ansell-Edmont: SpecWare Chemical Application and Recommendation Guide. Ansell-Edmont. Coshocton, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.ansellpro.com/specware. As accessed 10/31/2001.
    22) Araki A, Kamigaito N, Sasaki T, et al: Mutagenicity of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537, and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA/pKM101 and WP2/pKM101, using a gas exposure method. Environ Mol Mutagen 2004; 43:128-133.
    23) Arena JM & Drew RH: Poisoning, 5th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1986, pp 258-259.
    24) Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al: The American-European consensus conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-1347.
    25) Ashford R: Ashford's Dictionary of Industrial Chemicals, Wavelength Publications Ltd, London, England, 1994.
    26) Axelsson B: Arch Internat Pharmacodyn Ther 1953; 95:333-350.
    27) Baselt RC: Biological Monitoring Methods for Industrial Chemicals, 3rd ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 1997.
    28) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 3rd ed, Biomedical Publications, Davis, CA, 1995.
    29) Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed, Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000.
    30) Bata Shoe Company: Industrial Footwear Catalog, Bata Shoe Company, Belcamp, MD, 1995.
    31) Best Manufacturing: ChemRest Chemical Resistance Guide. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com. As accessed 10/8/2002.
    32) Best Manufacturing: Degradation and Permeation Data. Best Manufacturing. Menlo, GA. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.chemrest.com/DomesticPrep2/. As accessed 04/09/2004.
    33) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, 5th ed, 1 & 5, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001.
    34) Bingham E, Cohrssen B, & Powell CH: Patty's Toxicology, Vols 1 & 3. 5th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2001a.
    35) Bomski H: Gewerbepathol Gewerbehyg 1967; 24:127-134.
    36) Boss Manufacturing Company: Work Gloves, Boss Manufacturing Company, Kewanee, IL, 1998.
    37) Bouhouch R, El Houari T, Fellat I, et al: Pharmacological therapy in children with nodal reentry tachycardia: when, how and how long to treat the affected patients. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):766-769.
    38) Boyer E, Larson SC, & Perrone J: Limited hepatotoxicity following a massive chloroform ingestion treated with oral n-acetylcysteine (abstract). J Tox Clin Tox 1998; 36:440.
    39) Brower RG, Matthay AM, & Morris A: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
    40) Budavari S: The Merck Index, 12th ed, Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
    41) Burgess JL, Kirk M, Borron SW, et al: Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 34(2):205-212.
    42) CHRIS : CHRIS Hazardous Chemical Data. US Department of Transportation, US Coast Guard. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 7/31/2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    43) Cataletto M: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute(ARDS). In: Domino FJ, ed. The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2012, 20th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
    44) Challen P Jr: Br J Ind Med 1958; 15:243-249.
    45) ChemFab Corporation: Chemical Permeation Guide Challenge Protective Clothing Fabrics, ChemFab Corporation, Merrimack, NH, 1993.
    46) Choi SH, Lee SW, Hong YS, et al: Diagnostic radiopacity and hepatotoxicity following chloroform ingestion: a case report. Emerg Med J 2006; 23(5):394-395.
    47) Christensen KY, Vizcaya D, Richardson H, et al: Risk of selected cancers due to occupational exposure to chlorinated solvents in a case-control study in Montreal. J Occup Environ Med 2013; 55(2):198-208.
    48) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Toxicology, 4th ed, 2A,2D,2E, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994.
    49) Clayton GD & Clayton FE: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol 2, Toxicology, 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981.
    50) Cole WJ: Br J Anaesthesiol 1975; 47:1043-1047.
    51) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Chemical Resistance to Permeation Chart. Comasec Safety, Inc.. Enfield, CT. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.comasec.com/webcomasec/english/catalogue/mtabgb.html. As accessed 4/28/2003.
    52) Comasec Safety, Inc.: Product Literature, Comasec Safety, Inc., Enfield, CT, 2003a.
    53) Constan AA, Yang RSH, & Baker DC: A unique pattern of hepatocyte proliferation in F344 rats following long-term exposures to low levels of a chemical mixture of groundwater contaminants. Carcinogenesis 1995; 16:303-310.
    54) Cornish HH: Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1973; 34:487-492.
    55) Crawford MD: Clinical and biochemical findings in delayed chloroform poisoning. J Obstet Gynecol 1942; 49:549-555.
    56) Cullen SC, Ziffren SE, & Gibson RB: Anesthesia and liver injury with special reference to plasma prothrombin levels. JAMA 1940; 115:991-994.
    57) DFG: List of MAK and BAT Values 2002, Report No. 38, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany, 2002.
    58) Dally S, Garnier R, & Bismuth C: Diagnosis of chlorinated hydrocarbon poisoning by x-ray examination. Br J Ind Med 1987; 44:424-425.
    59) Danni O: Internat Arch Occup Environ Health 1981; 49:165-176.
    60) Dell'Aglio DM, Sutter ME, Schwartz MD, et al: Acute chloroform ingestion successfully treated with intravenously administered N-acetylcysteine. J Med Toxicol 2010; 6(2):143-146.
    61) Dilley JV: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1977; 41:196.
    62) Dowty BJ: Ped Res 1976; 10:696-701.
    63) Dragun J: The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, 1988.
    64) DuPont: DuPont Suit Smart: Interactive Tool for the Selection of Protective Apparel. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/protectiveapparel/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    65) DuPont: Permeation Guide for DuPont Tychem Protective Fabrics. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2003. Available from URL: http://personalprotection.dupont.com/en/pdf/tyvektychem/pgcomplete20030128.pdf. As accessed 4/26/2004.
    66) DuPont: Permeation Test Results. DuPont. Wilmington, DE. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.tyvekprotectiveapprl.com/databases/default.htm. As accessed 7/31/2002.
    67) Dykes MH: Halogenated hydrocarbon ingestion. Intern Anesth Clin 1970; 8:357-368.
    68) EPA: EPA chemical profile on chloroform, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1985.
    69) EPA: Pesticide Fact Book, Vol 2, Noyes Data Corp, Park Ridge, NJ, 1990.
    70) EPA: Search results for Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory Chemicals. US Environmental Protection Agency, Substance Registry System, U.S. EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.epa.gov/srs/.
    71) ERG: Emergency Response Guidebook. A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
    72) Edling C: Br J Ind Med 1982; 39:198-199.
    73) Fokina KV: The functional state of the olfactory and vestibular analyzers on exposure to the chlorine derivatives of methane. Hyg Sanit 1965; 30:182-186.
    74) Freeman HM: Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1989.
    75) Fujie K, Aoki T, & Ito Y: Sister-chromatid exchanges induced by trihalomethanes in rat erythroblastic cells and their suppression by crude catechin extracted from green tea. Mutat Res 1993; 300(3-4):241-246.
    76) Funes-Cravioto F: Lancet 1977; 2:322-325.
    77) Giusti GV & Chiarotti M: Double 'suicide' by chloroform in a pair of twins. Med Sci Law 1981; 21:2-3.
    78) Grant WM & Schuman JS: Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
    79) Greim H: Arch Toxicol 1977; 39:159-169.
    80) Gualandi G: Mutat Res 1984; 136:109-114.
    81) Guardian Manufacturing Group: Guardian Gloves Test Results. Guardian Manufacturing Group. Willard, OH. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.guardian-mfg.com/guardianmfg.html. As accessed 12/11/2001.
    82) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    83) HSDB : Hazardous Substances Data Bank. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD (Internet Version). Edition expires July/31/1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    84) Haas CF: Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27(3):469-486.
    85) Hakim A, Jain AK, & Jain R: Chloroform ingestion causing toxic hepatitis. J Assoc Phys India 1992; 40:477.
    86) Harada K, Ichiyama T, & Ikeda H: An autopsy case of acute chloroform intoxication after intermittent inhalation for years. Jpn J Legal Med 1997; 51:319-323.
    87) Harbison RD: Hamilton & Hardy's Industrial Toxicology, 5th ed, Mosby Year Book, Inc, St Louis, MO, 1998.
    88) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 3rd ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1991.
    89) Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, 4th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1996.
    90) Heilbrunn G, Liebert E, & Szanto PB: Chronic chloroform poisoning. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1945; 53:68-72.
    91) Hoffman A: Arbeitsmed Socialmed Praventivmed 1983; 18:181-185.
    92) Hoong PW: Ann Acad Med 1975; 4:396-399.
    93) Hopkins RM & Krantz JC Jr: Anesth Analg 1968; 47:56-67.
    94) Howard PH, Boethling RS, & Jarvis WF: Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1991.
    95) Howard PH: Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals. Volume II: Solvents, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1990.
    96) Hughes JB & Parkin GF: The effect of mixtures of xenobiotics and primary electron donor on the anaerobic biotransformation of high concentrations of chlorinated aliphatics. Water Sci Technol 1992; 26:117-126.
    97) Hutchens KS & Kung M: "Experimentation" with chloroform. Am J Med 1985; 78:715-718.
    98) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: 1,3-Butadiene, Ethylene Oxide and Vinyl Halides (Vinyl Fluoride, Vinyl Chloride and Vinyl Bromide), 97, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2008.
    99) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol, 88, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2006.
    100) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Household Use of Solid Fuels and High-temperature Frying, 95, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010a.
    101) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines, 89, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2007.
    102) IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans : IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Some Non-heterocyclic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Some Related Exposures, 92, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2010.
    103) IARC: List of all agents, mixtures and exposures evaluated to date - IARC Monographs: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Volumes 1-88, 1972-PRESENT. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, FranceAvailable from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html. As accessed Oct 07, 2004.
    104) ICAO: Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, 2003-2004. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
    105) ILC Dover, Inc.: Ready 1 The Chemturion Limited Use Chemical Protective Suit, ILC Dover, Inc., Frederica, DE, 1998.
    106) ILO: Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 3rd ed, Vols 1 & 2, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.
    107) IPCS: Environmental Health Criteria 163-Chloform, International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994.
    108) ITI: Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals Safety Manual, The International Technical Information Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    109) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: list of classifications, volumes 1-116. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Lyon, France. 2016. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php. As accessed 2016-08-24.
    110) International Agency for Research on Cancer: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. 2015. Available from URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/. As accessed 2015-08-06.
    111) JEF Reynolds : Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia (CD-ROM version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 1998; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    112) Jorgenson TA et al: Government Report Announcements and Index (GRA&I); 5. National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 1986.
    113) Kappler, Inc.: Suit Smart. Kappler, Inc.. Guntersville, AL. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.kappler.com/suitsmart/smartsuit2/na_english.asp?select=1. As accessed 7/10/2001.
    114) Keaton BF: Chlorinated hydrocarbons, in Haddad LM & Winchester JF (eds): Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdose, 2nd ed, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, pp 1216-1222.
    115) Kim H: A case of acute toxic hepatitis after suicidal chloroform and dichloromethane ingestion. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26(9):1073-1076.
    116) Kimberly-Clark, Inc.: Chemical Test Results. Kimberly-Clark, Inc.. Atlanta, GA. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.kc-safety.com/tech_cres.html. As accessed 10/4/2002.
    117) King WD & Marrett LD: Case-control study of bladder cancer and chlorination by-products in treated water (Ontario, Canada). Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7:596-604.
    118) Kirkland DJ: Food Cosmet Toxicol 1981; 19:651-656.
    119) Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl.3):S876-S908.
    120) Kohr RM: Suicide by chloroform ingestion following self-mutilation. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1990; 11:324-328.
    121) Kollef MH & Schuster DP: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:27-37.
    122) LaCrosse-Rainfair: Safety Products, LaCrosse-Rainfair, Racine, WI, 1997.
    123) Land PC: Anesthesiol 1981; 54:53-56.
    124) Larson JL, Sprankle CS, & Butterworth BE: Lack of chloroform-induced DNA repair in vitro and in vivo in hepatocytes of female B6C3F-1 mice. Environ Mol Mutagen 1994; 23:132-136.
    125) Laurenzi RG, Locatelli C, & Brucato A: N-Acetylcysteine: A proposal for therapy in acute poisoning due to highly hepatotoxic organic solvents. Vet Human Toxicol 1987; 29 (Suppl 2):95.
    126) Levesque B, Ayotte P, & Leblanc A: Evaluation of dermal and respiratory chloroform exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102:1082-1087.
    127) Lewis RA: Lewis' Dictionary of Toxicology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.
    128) Lewis RJ: Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 13th ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, 1997.
    129) Lewis RJ: Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 2000.
    130) Lin C, Du C, Chan C, et al: Saved by a material safety data sheet. Occup Med (Lond) 2005; 55(8):635-637.
    131) Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al: Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S444-S464.
    132) Lionte C: Lethal complications after poisoning with chloroform--case report and literature review. Hum Exp Toxicol 2010; 29(7):615-622.
    133) Luedtke SA, Kuhn RJ, & McCaffrey FM: Pharmacologic management of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part 2: Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and junctional and atrial ectopic tachycardia. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31(11):1347-1359.
    134) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/pro/ChemicalSearch.asp. As accessed 4/21/2003.
    135) MAPA Professional: Chemical Resistance Guide. MAPA North America. Columbia, TN. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.mapaglove.com/ProductSearch.cfm?id=1. As accessed 6/10/2004.
    136) Mandapati R , Byrum CJ , Kavey RE , et al: Procainamide for rate control of postsurgical junctional tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21(2):123-128.
    137) Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc: Product Literature, Protective Apparel, Mar-Mac Manufacturing, Inc., McBee, SC, 1995.
    138) Marigold Industrial: US Chemical Resistance Chart, on-line version. Marigold Industrial. Norcross, GA. 2003. Available from URL: www.marigoldindustrial.com/charts/uschart/uschart.html. As accessed 4/14/2003.
    139) Matsuki A: The first fatal case of chloroform anaesthesia in Australia. Anesth Intens Care 1973; 1:301-302.
    140) McGee MB, Jejurikar SG, & VanBerkom LC: A double homicide as a result of chloroform poisoning. J Forens Sci 1987; 32:1453-1459.
    141) Memphis Glove Company: Permeation Guide. Memphis Glove Company. Memphis, TN. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.memphisglove.com/permeation.html. As accessed 7/2/2001.
    142) Mery S, Larson JL, & Butterworth BE: Nasal toxicity of chloroform in male F-344 rats and female B6C3F(1) mice following a 1-week inhalation exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 125:214-227.
    143) Montgomery Safety Products: Montgomery Safety Products Chemical Resistant Glove Guide, Montgomery Safety Products, Canton, OH, 1995.
    144) Morimoto K & Koizumi A: Environ Res 1983; 32:72-79.
    145) Morris RD, Audet A-M, & Angelillo IF: Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1992; 83:955-963.
    146) Murray FJ: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1979; 50:515-522.
    147) NCI: Report on the carcinogenesis bioassay of chloroform, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1976.
    148) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 12th ed, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1997.
    149) NFPA: Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials, 13th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
    150) NHLBI ARDS Network: Mechanical ventilation protocol summary. Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.ardsnet.org/system/files/6mlcardsmall_2008update_final_JULY2008.pdf. As accessed 2013-08-07.
    151) NIOSH : Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    152) NIOSH: Occupational Exposure to Chloroform, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1974.
    153) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 1, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
    154) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 2, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
    155) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 3, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
    156) NRC: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals - Volume 4, Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
    157) Naradzay J & Barish RA: Approach to ophthalmologic emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2006; 90(2):305-328.
    158) Narayanan B, Suidan MT, & Gelderloos AB: Treatment of VOCs in high strength wastes using an anaerobic expanded-bed GAC reactor. Water Res 1993; 27:181-194.
    159) Nat-Wear: Protective Clothing, Hazards Chart. Nat-Wear. Miora, NY. 2001. Available from URL: http://www.natwear.com/hazchart1.htm. As accessed 7/12/2001.
    160) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    161) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    162) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Butylene Oxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648083cdbb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    163) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,2-Dibromoethane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802796db&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    164) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d68a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    165) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for 2-Ethylhexyl Chloroformate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037904e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    166) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Acrylonitrile (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648028e6a3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    167) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Adamsite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    168) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ad507&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-18.
    169) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Allyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039d9ee&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    170) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    171) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Arsenic Trioxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480220305&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    172) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Automotive Gasoline Unleaded (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cc17&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    173) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Biphenyl (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1b7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    174) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648022db11&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    175) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Boron Tribromide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae1d3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    176) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromine Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648039732a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    177) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Bromoacetone (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187bf&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    178) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Calcium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    179) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803ae328&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    180) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Carbonyl Sulfide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648037ff26&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    181) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Chlorobenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064803a52bb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    182) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Cyanogen (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809187fe&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    183) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Dimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbf3&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    184) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Diphenylchloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    185) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091884e&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    186) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyl Phosphorodichloridate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480920347&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    187) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethylbenzene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809203e7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    188) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ethyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    189) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Germane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963906&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    190) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hexafluoropropylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064801ea1f5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    191) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Ketene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ee7c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    192) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Aluminum Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    193) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Magnesium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    194) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Malathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809639df&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    195) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Mercury Vapor (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a087&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    196) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Isothiocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a03&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    197) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963a57&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    198) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064802a4985&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    199) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methylchlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5f4&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    200) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    201) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Methyldichlorosilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c646&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    202) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN1 CAS Reg. No. 538-07-8) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006a. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    203) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN2 CAS Reg. No. 51-75-2) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006b. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    204) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Mustard (HN3 CAS Reg. No. 555-77-1) (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6cb&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    205) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Tetroxide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008n. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648091855b&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    206) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Nitrogen Trifluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009l. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    207) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Parathion (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008o. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480963e32&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    208) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perchloryl Fluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e268&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    209) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Perfluoroisobutylene (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    210) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008p. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dd58&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    211) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006d. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020cc0c&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    212) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phenyldichloroarsine (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2007k. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020fd29&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    213) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phorate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008q. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096dcc8&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    214) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene (Draft-Revised). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a8a08a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    215) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Phosgene Oxime (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e26d&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    216) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    217) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Potassium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005c. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    218) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Propargyl Alcohol (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec91&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    219) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Selenium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec55&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    220) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Silane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006g. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d523&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    221) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Cyanide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7cbb9&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-15.
    222) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sodium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    223) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Strontium Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005f. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    224) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Sulfuryl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006h. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020ec7a&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    225) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tear Gas (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008s. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e551&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    226) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tellurium Hexafluoride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7e2a1&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    227) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tert-Octyl Mercaptan (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008r. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5c7&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    228) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Tetramethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-17.
    229) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethoxysilane (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006i. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d632&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    230) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethyl Phosphite (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2009j. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=0900006480a7d608&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    231) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Trimethylacetyl Chloride (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008t. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648096e5cc&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    232) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Zinc Phosphide (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2005e. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020c5ed&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    233) National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for n-Butyl Isocyanate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2008m. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064808f9591&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-12.
    234) National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute: Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2007. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
    235) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, 2007.
    236) National Research Council : Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 5, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
    237) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 6, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
    238) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 7, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
    239) National Research Council: Acute exposure guideline levels for selected airborne chemicals, 8, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010.
    240) Neese Industries, Inc.: Fabric Properties Rating Chart. Neese Industries, Inc.. Gonzales, LA. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.neeseind.com/new/TechGroup.asp?Group=Fabric+Properties&Family=Technical. As accessed 4/15/2003.
    241) Neumar RW , Otto CW , Link MS , et al: Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
    242) North: Chemical Resistance Comparison Chart - Protective Footwear . North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.linkpath.com/index2gisufrm.php?t=N-USA1. As accessed April 30, 2004.
    243) North: eZ Guide Interactive Software. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002a. Available from URL: http://www.northsafety.com/feature1.htm. As accessed 8/31/2002.
    244) OHM/TADS : Oil and Hazardous Materials/Technical Assistance Data System. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC (Internet Version). Edition expires 7/31/2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    245) Orth OS & Cohen EMB: II-the effect of chloroform on renal function, in Waters RM (ed): Chloroform: A Study After 100 Years, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1951.
    246) Peate WF: Work-related eye injuries and illnesses. Am Fam Physician 2007; 75(7):1017-1022.
    247) Pereira MA: Environ Health Perspect 1982; 46:151-156.
    248) Playtex: Fits Tough Jobs Like a Glove, Playtex, Westport, CT, 1995.
    249) Plunkett ER: Handbook of Industrial Toxicology, Chemical Publishing Co, Inc, New York, NY, 1976, pp 101-102.
    250) Pohanish RP & Greene SA: Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, 1997.
    251) Proctor NH & Hughes JP: Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, PA, 1978, pp 167-169.
    252) Product Information: Cordarone(R) oral tablets, amiodarone HCl oral tablets. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc (per FDA), Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
    253) Product Information: Lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution, lidocaine HCl intravenous injection solution. Hospira (per manufacturer), Lake Forest, IL, 2006.
    254) Product Information: procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution, procainamide HCl IV, IM injection solution. Hospira, Inc (per DailyMed), Lake Forest, IL, 2011.
    255) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    256) RTECS : Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH (Internet Version). Edition expires July/31/1999; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    257) Rao KN, Virji MA, & Moraca MA: Role of serum markers for liver function and liver regeneration in the management of chloroform poisoning. J Analyt Tox 1993; 17:99-102.
    258) Ratnasamy C, Rossique-Gonzalez M, & Young ML: Pharmacological therapy in children with atrioventricular reentry: which drug?. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(8):753-761.
    259) Raymond P & Plaa GL: Ketone potentiation of haloalkane-induced hepato- and nephrotoxicity. 1. Dose-response relationships. J Toxicol Environ Health 1995; 45:465-480.
    260) Reichenbach DD: Cardiovascular system, in: Mottet NK (Ed), Environmental Pathology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1985, pp 356-367.
    261) Reitz RH: Environ Health Perspect 1982; 46:163-168.
    262) Reynolds JEF: Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th ed, The Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK, 1982, pp 745-746.
    263) Rhee E & Speece RE: Maximal biodegradation rates of chloroform and trichloroethylene in anaerobic treatment. Water Sci Technol 1992; 25:121-130.
    264) River City: Protective Wear Product Literature, River City, Memphis, TN, 1995.
    265) Rosenthal SL: A review of the mutagenicity of chloroform. Environ Mol Mutagen 1987; 10:211-226.
    266) Ruddick JA: J Environ Sci Health 1983; B18:333-349.
    267) S Sweetman : Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference (electronic version). The Pharmaceutical Press. London, UK (Internet Version). Edition expires 2001; provided by Truven Health Analytics Inc., Greenwood Village, CO.
    268) Safety 4: North Safety Products: Chemical Protection Guide. North Safety. Cranston, RI. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.safety4.com/guide/set_guide.htm. As accessed 8/14/2002.
    269) Schroeder HG: Acute and delayed chloroform poisoning. Br J Anaeseth 1965; 37:972-975.
    270) Schwetz BA: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1974; 28:442-451.
    271) Servus: Norcross Safety Products, Servus Rubber, Servus, Rock Island, IL, 1995.
    272) Sharma GP & Anand RK: Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect 1984; B54:61-67.
    273) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 2nd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1985.
    274) Sittig M: Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens, 3rd ed, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1991.
    275) Speitel GE & Leonard JM: A sequencing biofilm reactor for the treatment of chlorinated solvents using methanotrophs. Water Environment Res 1992; 64:712-719.
    276) Speitel GE, Thompson RC, & Weissman D: Biodegradation kinetics of methylosinus trichosporium OB3b at low concentrations of chloroform in the presence and absence of enzyme competition by methane. Water Res 1993; 27:15-24.
    277) Sridhar N, Krishnakishore C, Sandeep Y, et al: Chloroform poisoning--a case report. Renal Fail 2011; 33(10):1037-1039.
    278) Standard Safety Equipment: Product Literature, Standard Safety Equipment, McHenry, IL, 1995.
    279) Stander HJ: A chemical study of a case of chloroform poisoning. John Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, 1924.
    280) Stolbach A & Hoffman RS: Respiratory Principles. In: Nelson LS, Hoffman RS, Lewin NA, et al, eds. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 9th ed. McGraw Hill Medical, New York, NY, 2011.
    281) Storms WW: Chloroform parties. JAMA 1973; 225:160.
    282) Thompson DJ: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1974; 29:348-357.
    283) Timms RM & Moser KM: Toxicity secondary to intravenously administrated chloroform in humans. Arch Intern Med 1975; 135:1601-1603.
    284) Tingley: Chemical Degradation for Footwear and Clothing. Tingley. South Plainfield, NJ. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.tingleyrubber.com/tingley/Guide_ChemDeg.pdf. As accessed 10/16/2002.
    285) Townsend E: Acute yellow atrophy of the liver. Br Med J 1939; 2:558-560.
    286) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Chemical and Biological Tests (database). Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.trelleborg.com/protective/. As accessed 10/18/2002.
    287) Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.: Trellchem Chemical Protective Suits, Interactive manual & Chemical Database. Trelleborg-Viking, Inc.. Portsmouth, NH. 2001.
    288) Tumasonis CF, McMartin DN, & Bush B: Toxicity of chloroform and bromodichloromethane when administered over a lifetime in rats. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 1987; 7:55-63.
    289) U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 26 for chemicals of concern. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Emergency Management. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.hss.doe.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/Chem_Safety/teel.html. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    290) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Project : 11th Report on Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. Washington, DC. 2005. Available from URL: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/INDEXA5E1.HTM?objectid=32BA9724-F1F6-975E-7FCE50709CB4C932. As accessed 2011-06-27.
    291) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities 2010b; 40CFR(261.33, e-f):77-.
    292) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2011. Available from URL: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showSubstanceList&list_type=date. As accessed 2011-06-21.
    293) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of Radionuclides. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010a. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    294) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: List of hazardous substances and reportable quantities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-sec302-4.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    295) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The list of extremely hazardous substances and their threshold planning quantities (CAS Number Order). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2010c. Available from URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol27/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol27-part355.pdf. As accessed 2011-06-17.
    296) U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Part 1910 - Occupational safety and health standards (continued) Occupational Safety, and Health Administration's (OSHA) list of highly hazardous chemicals, toxics and reactives. Subpart Z - toxic and hazardous substances. CFR 2010 2010; Vol6(SEC1910):7-.
    297) U.S. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA): Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals. 29 CFR 2010 2010; 29(1910.119):348-.
    298) United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Vinyl Acetate (Proposed). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 2006. Available from URL: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=090000648020d6af&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf. As accessed 2010-08-16.
    299) Urben PG: Bretherick's Reactive Chemical Hazards Database, Version 2.0, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2000.
    300) Van Abbe NJ: Food Chem Toxicol 1982; 20:557-562.
    301) Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, et al: Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S829-S861.
    302) Vanden Hoek,TL; Morrison LJ; Shuster M et al: Part 12: Cardiac Arrest in Special Situations 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX. 2010. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/122/18_suppl_3/S829. As accessed 2010-10-21.
    303) Vlad IA, Armstrong J, & Gault A: A painless burn: systemic toxicity after dermal exposure to chloroform. Emerg Med Australas 2014; 26(6):648-649.
    304) Walsh EP , Saul JP , Sholler GF , et al: Evaluation of a staged treatment protocol for rapid automatic junctional tachycardia after operation for congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(5):1046-1053.
    305) Watanabe K, Seno H, & Ishii A: Capillary gas chromatography with cryogenic oven temperature for headspace samples: analysis of chloroform or methylene chloride in whole blood. Anal Chem 1997; 69:5178-5181.
    306) Watts P: Food Chem Toxicol 1986; 24:359-360.
    307) Weisburger EK: Environ Health Perspect 1977; 21:7-16.
    308) Weisel CP & Jo WK: Ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposures to chloroform and trichloroethene from tap water. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104:48-51.
    309) Wells Lamont Industrial: Chemical Resistant Glove Application Chart. Wells Lamont Industrial. Morton Grove, IL. 2002. Available from URL: http://www.wellslamontindustry.com. As accessed 10/31/2002.
    310) Willson DF, Truwit JD, Conaway MR, et al: The adult calfactant in acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) trial. Chest 2015; 148(2):356-364.
    311) Wilson DF, Thomas NJ, Markovitz BP, et al: Effect of exogenous surfactant (calfactant) in pediatric acute lung injury. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293:470-476.
    312) Workrite: Chemical Splash Protection Garments, Technical Data and Application Guide, W.L. Gore Material Chemical Resistance Guide, Workrite, Oxnard, CA, 1997.
    313) de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542.